alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-268-000]

Take notice that on May 2, 2000, Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (Destin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, revised tariff sheets attached as Appendix A to the filing, proposed to become effective June 1, 2000.

Destin states that the purpose of this filing is to make certain housekeeping changes and to reflect a change in operator status as a result of the pending sale of Southern Natural Gas Company's (Southern) one-third ownership interest in Destin to Amoco Destin Pipeline Company (Amoco). A change in operator status is necessitated since the original operator, Southern, will no longer be a member-owner of Destin. Amoco and Tejas Destin, LLC will jointly operate the Destin pipeline system as more fully described in the application.

Destin also requests waiver of Order No. 587-I, to implement Internet Communications by December 31, 2000, and of its tariff requirements to offer shippers the option of electronic service agreements and other legal documents.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11780 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (a)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| (b)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                           |                                 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                                  | /s/ Alfred                  Lam |
|   | Name: Alfred                    LamTitle: Chief                    Executive Officer |

----
Dr. Donn J. Viviani 4907 Yorktown Blvd Arlington, VA 22207 Dear Dr. Viviani: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D
. C. 20460



### JUL 1 0 

## 2015 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

I am writing to confirm that on June 30,2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency received a petition from you and the Center for Biological Diversity requesting that EPA promulgate regulations pursuant to Section 6 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to protect " public health and the environment from the serious harms associated with anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide , including ocean acidification
." The petition alternately requests that EPA "adopt a rule under section 4 of [TSCA] requiring manufacturers and processors responsible for the generation of carbon dioxide to undertake testing to determine toxicity, persistence, and other character istics which affect health and the environment and are necessary to determine if there is an unreasonable risk of injury to health and the environment. " Your petition has been filed pursuant to TSCA Section 21, which provides that within 90 days after the date of tiling, or September 27, 2015, for your petition, the Administrator shall either grant or deny the petition
. Section 21 ofTSCA further provides that if the Administrator grants such petition, then the Administrator shall promptly commence an appropriate proceeding
. Section 21 ofTSCA also provides that if the Administrator den ies such petition, then the Administrator shall publish in the 

### Federal Register the Administrator's reasons for such denial. If you have any questions relating to your petition or EPA's guidelines for TSCA Section 21 petitions , please contact Mike Mattheisen by telephone at (202) 564-3077 or by email at mattheisen.mike @ epa.gov. Sincerely,

# ~C.~ Wendy Cleland-H amnett, Director Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics
cc: Ms
. Miyoko Sakashita Oceans Director, Center for Biological Diversity

I nternet Address (URL) • http;l/www.epa gov Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted wtth Vegetable Otl Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer Process Ch lonne Free Recycled Paper
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

144) IV-C-110 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:59 AM Sheet 144 of 232 
P.2 

y"08*-* 

V-ssesy 

-XZ.-c.-liQ 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 

APR I 9 1988 

THE ADMINISTRATOR 

Mr. Roger B. Smith 

Chairman, General Motors Corp. 

3044 West Grand Blvd. 

Detroit, MI 48202 

Dear Mr. Smith: 

I'm sure you are aware of the debate surrounding EPA's 

proposal to require that all new gasoline-powered vehicles 

install systems that capture vapors that currently escape into 

the atmosphere during refueling. One of the most controversial 

issues in the debate is the safety implications of these 

potential "onboard" vehicle systems. 

EPA has been aware of the safety issue for a long time and 

has attempted to study it in a straightforward, technical 

manner. At the time we announced the details of our onboard 

proposal (July 1987), we made available to interested ..parties 

an EPA technical report on the safety of onboard systems. We 

requested comments on our analysis as well as additional 

information that would help us fully understand this safety 

issue. We have subsequently received many comments from motor 

vehicle manufacturers and others during our public hearing in 

October 1987 and more recently in written comments submitted to 

the public docket. 

In light of the.".? comments we have underway a series of 

efforts. One of the most successful has been a staff project 

to design and assemble a prototype onboard system which would 

not increase the complexity beyond that of fuel systems in use 

on today's cars and trucks. 

That effort is now complete. I have seen the prototype and 

was very impressed by its simplicity compared to current fuel 

evaporative control systems. Notably, the prototype system 

exclusively uses current production parts with very few 

modifications. Tests conducted on the prototype show that it 

consistently complies with the performance standard we have 

proposed for onboard systems. 
*% '*0 A 

'O/v 

P.3 

v5"'V 
P.4 

\--4 * 

- 2 -

My staff has been in contact with your staff to offer to 

meet and present our prototype hardware. We are very 

interested in GM's comments on our work. In particular, I 

would like to encourage you and other senior GM managers to 

carefully evaluate these new developments. 

Thank you for your consideration of this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

•tee M«. Thomas 

Lee M. Thomas
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF GEO SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, INC. AS OF JUNE 30, 1999
AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999. EXCEPT FOR THE DATES AND PER SHARE DATA, ALL AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS
OF DOLLARS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,786
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                       342
<INVENTORY>                                      9,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,271
<PP&E>                                         104,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,292
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,778
<SALES>                                         36,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,352
<CGS>                                           27,408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    28
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    914
<INCOME-TAX>                                       426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                488
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       488
<EPS-BASIC>                                    3,588.2
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3,588.2


</TABLE>
§ 406.107 Appearances of parties, and attorneys and representatives. ( a ) Any party may appear and be heard in person.
( b ) Any party may be accompanied, represented, or advised by an attorney or representative designated by the party. ( 1 ) An attorney or representative who represents a party must file a notice of appearance in the action with the Docket Management System and must serve a copy of the notice of appearance on each other party before participating in any proceeding governed by this subpart.
( 2 ) The attorney or representative must include his or her name, address, and telephone number in the notice of appearance.
( 3 ) That attorney or representative in any proceeding governed by this subpart may examine the party.
( 4 ) Service of a document on the party's attorney or representative is considered to be service on the party.
( c ) An agency attorney represents the complainant.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3389

To amend the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 to permit 

Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Awards to be made to nonprofit 

organizations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2003

Mr. MILLER of North Carolina (for himself and Ms. HART) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science 

A BILL

To amend the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act 

of 1980 to permit Malcolm Baldrige National Quality 

Awards to be made to nonprofit organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. 

4 Section 17(c)(1) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology 

5 Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3711a(c)(1)) is amend6 ed by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(F) Nonprofit organizations.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MULTI-LINK  TELECOMMUNICATIONS,  INC.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending  March 31,  2005,  (the
"Report"),  I, Kevin R. Keating, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


Date:  May 16, 2005

                                                /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                and Chief Financial Officer
#### STURDIVANT v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 30, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. Wm. E. Fort.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

EVANS, J.

The record is in all things regular, and the time for filing the bill of exceptions having expired, the cause is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.4
 NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
LOAN AGREEMENT and
PROMISSORY NOTE
 US $1 million
    
    October 21, 2008
 SECTION 1. GENERAL .
 SDS Holder Northwest
Biotherapeutics, Inc. Maker Company Principal Amount Note
 Maturity Date
 SECTION 2. PRE-PAYMENT .
  SECTION 3. DEFAULT PAYMENT .
 Event of Default Default Principal SBA Default Payments




---



##### 



SECTION 4. DEFAULTS .
 4.1 Definitions Event of Default
     Involuntary Petition
 4.2 Remedies on Default.
  inter alia




---



##### 



SECTION 5. DEFENSES .
  SECTION 6. EXTENSION OF MATURITY .
  SECTION 7. ATTORNEYS FEES AND COLLECTION FEES .
  SECTION 8. WAIVERS, DISPUTES, JURISDICTION .
 8.1 Waivers by Maker
 8.2 Actions of Holder not a Waiver
 8.3 Consent to Jurisdiction




---



##### 



8.4 Waiver of Jury Trial
 8.5 Service of Process
 SECTION 9. COVENANTS .
 9.1 Affirmative Covenants
 Office
 Use of Proceeds FDA SEC




---



##### 



Regulatory Information
 (d) Business Activity
 9.2 Negative Covenants
 No Liens Liens
 No Conflicting Agreements
 SECTION 10. WARRANT
 Exhibit A




---



##### 



SECTION 11. MAKERS REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES .
  11.1 Organization, Good Standing and Qualification
 11.2 Authorization
 11.3 No Conflicts
 11.4 Small Business.
 Small Business Status Federal Regulations Small Business Act SBIA
 Information for SBA Reports
 Eligibility




---



##### 



SECTION 12. HOLDERS REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
 12.1 Unregistered Shares Warrant Shares Securities
Act
 12.2 Accredited Investor
 12.3 Investment Purpose
 SECTION 13. INDEMNIFICATION
 13.1 Indemnification.
 Indemnified Persons




---



##### 



13.2 Survival
 SECTION 14. SUBSEQUENT FINANCING.
 Subsequent Financing Additional
Securities
 Subsequent Financing Notice Subsequent
Financing Description
 nd provided,




---



##### 



SECTION 15. MISCELLANEOUS
 15.1 Notices
 if to Maker:
    
    Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.7600 Wisconsin AvenueSuite 750Bethesda, MD  20814Tel:   +1-240-497-4060Fax:   +1-240-497-4065Attention:   Alton Boyntonaboynton@nwbio.comwith a copy to:
    
    David Engvall, Esq.Covington & Burling1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC  20004-2401Tel:  +1-202-662-5307Fax: +1- 202-778-5307dengvall@cov.comif to Holder:with a copy to:
  15.2 Parties In Interest; Assignment




---



##### 



15.3 Entire Agreement
 15.4 Severability
 15.5 Amendments
 15.6 Headings
 15.7 Governing Law
 15.8 Nature of Obligation
 15.9 No Third Party Rights
 15.10 Counterparts
 15.11 Replacment of Note.




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
    
    
    
    SDS CAPITALBy:
    
    /s/ Alton Boynton
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/  Steve DerbyName: Alton Boynton
    
    
    
    
    
    Name: Steve DerbyTitle: President
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0099 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MATTHEW MORGAN MAYS,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 18 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 14 2023

08/14/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0099
§ 431.13 Transfer of a reusable launch vehicle mission license. ( a ) Only the FAA may transfer an RLV mission license.
( b ) An applicant for transfer of an RLV mission license shall submit a license application in accordance with part 413 of this subchapter and satisfy the applicable requirements of this part. The FAA will transfer an RLV mission license to an applicant who has obtained all of the approvals and determinations required under this chapter for an RLV mission license. In conducting its reviews and issuing approvals and determinations, the FAA may incorporate any findings made part of the record to support the initial licensing determination. The FAA may modify an RLV mission license to reflect any changes necessary as a result of a license transfer.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 36 (Friday, February 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 12411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04144]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8195]

Shipping Coordinating Committee Notice of Renewal of Charter

SUMMARY: The Department of State has renewed the Charter for the 
Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) without significant substantive 
change. Through this Committee, the Department of State will continue 
to obtain the views and advice of interested government agencies and 
bureaus and public members in the maritime and related fields, on 
issues related to maritime security, safety of life at sea, and 
protection of the marine environment considered by the International 
Maritime Organization (IMO), and other matters relating to 
international maritime shipping. The Under Secretary for Management has 
determined the Committee is necessary and in the public interest.
    The Committee follows the procedures prescribed by the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Meetings will be open to the public 
unless a determination is made in accordance with section 10(d) of the 
FACA and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) that a meeting or portion of the meeting 
should be closed to the public. Notice of each meeting will be 
published in the Federal Register at least 15 days prior to the 
meeting, unless there are extraordinary circumstances that require 
shorter notice.
    For further information, please contact: Lieutenant Commander Brian 
W. Robinson, Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, U.S. 
Department of State, Office of Oceans Affairs, at RobinsonBW@state.gov 
or by telephone at 202-647-3946. A copy of the Committee charter may 
also be obtained by accessing the FACA database maintained by the 
General Services Administration: http://fido.gov/facadatabase.

    Dated: January 22, 2013.
Brian W. Robinson,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2013-04144 Filed 2-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
```
§ 406.115 Serving documents on other parties. ( a ) *Service required.* A person must serve on each other party at the time of filing a copy of any document filed with the Federal Docket Management System. Service on a party's attorney or representative of record is adequate service on the party.
( b ) *Method of service.* A person must serve documents by personal delivery or by mail.
( c ) *Certificate of service.* A person may attach a certificate of service to a document filed with the FDMS. Any certificate of service must include a statement, dated and signed by the individual filing the document, that the document was served on each party, the method of service, and the date of service.
( d ) *Date of service.* The date of service is the date of personal delivery; or if mailed, the mailing date shown on the certificate of service, the date shown on the postmark if there is no certificate of service, or other mailing date shown by other evidence if there is no certificate of service or postmark. The date shown in the FDMS index is not necessarily the date of service. It is the date the FDMS received the document.
( e ) *Additional time after service by mail.* Whenever a party has a right or a duty to act or to make any response within a prescribed period after service by mail, or on a specified date after service by mail, 5 days is added to the prescribed period.
( f ) *Service by the administrative law judge.* The administrative law judge must serve a copy of each document including, but not limited to, notices of pre-hearing conferences and hearings, rulings on motions, decisions, and orders, upon each party to the proceedings by personal delivery or by mail.
( g ) *Service made.* A document is deemed served in accordance with this subpart if it was properly addressed; was sent in accordance with this subpart; and was returned, not claimed, or refused. Service is considered valid as of the date and the time that the document was mailed, or personal delivery of the document was refused.
( h ) *Presumption of service.* There is a presumption of service where a party or a person, who customarily receives mail, or receives it in the ordinary course of business, at either the person's residence or the person's principal place of business, acknowledges receipt of the document.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-8607, 66 FR 2180, Jan. 10, 2001, as amended at 72 FR 68476, Dec. 5, 2007]
#### Cecelia L. Bordon, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeanette Lukaszewski, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation, Appellant.

(Argued October 9, 1936;

decided October 23, 1936.)

*597
      *N. Otis Rockwood*for appellant.

*Henry Hirschberg*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, J.