alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - [Transmittal No. 00-32]

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 00-32 with attached transmittal and policy justification. 

Dated: April 24, 2000.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

      ( print page 24927)          ( print page 24928)          ( print page 24929)    

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C

[FR Doc. 00-10575  Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
§ 298.70 Public disclosure of data. ( a ) Detailed domestic on-flight market data and nonstop segment data except military data shall be made publicly available after processing. Domestic data are defined as data from air transportation operations from a place in any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, or a U.S. territory or possession to a place in any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, or a U.S. territory or possession. Domestic military operations are reported under service codes N or R.
( b ) Detailed international on-flight market and nonstop segment data in Schedule T-100 and Schedule T-100(f) reports, except military data, shall be publicly available immediately following the Department's determination that the database is complete, but no earlier than six months after the date of the data. Military operations are reported under service codes N or R. Data for on-flight markets and nonstop segments involving no U.S. points shall not be made publicly available for three years. Industry and carrier summary data may be made public before the end of six months or the end of three years, as applicable, provided there are three or more carriers in the summary data disclosed. The Department may, at any time, publish international summary statistics without carrier detail.
( c ) Schedule F-1 “Report of Financial Data” shall be withheld from public release for a period of 3 years after the close of the calendar quarter to which the report relates.
( d ) The Department may release nonstop segment and on-flight market detail data by carrier or individual Schedule F-1 “Report of Financial Data” before the end of the confidentiality period as follows: ( 1 ) To foreign governments as provided in reciprocal arrangements between the foreign country and the U.S. Government for exchange of on-flight market and/or nonstop segment data submitted by air carriers of that foreign country and U.S. carriers serving that foreign country.
( 2 ) To parties to any proceeding before the Department under 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII (Transportation), as required by an Administrative Law Judge or other decision-maker of the Department. Parties may designate agents or consultants to receive the data in their behalf, provided the agents or consultants agree to abide by the disclosure restrictions. Any data to which access is granted pursuant to this provision may be introduced into evidence, subject to the normal rules of admissibility.
( 3 ) To agencies or other components of the U.S. Government for their internal use only.
[Doc. No. OST-98-4043, 67 FR 49234, July 30, 2002, as amended by DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019]
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Larry L. Richards, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: August 15, 2005

/s/ Larry L. Richards
-------------------------------------
Larry L. Richards
Controller (Principal Financial and
 Accounting Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

C&C ROAD CONSTRUCTION, INC., §

Appellant /Cross

- Appellee

, § No. 08

- 17

- 00 056

- CV

v. § Appeal from the

§ County Court at Law Number Six SAAB SITE CONTRACTORS, L.P.,

Appellee /Cross

- Appellant

. § of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 201 4DCV2960 ) §

J U D G M E N T

The C ourt has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in that

part of the judgment denying Appellee/Cross

- Appellant’s appellate attorney’s fees . W e therefore

reverse that portion of the judgment denying appellate attorney’s fees, and remand for a new trial

limited to the issue of Appellee/Cross

- Appellant’s appellate attorney’s fees.

The remainder of the judgment is affirmed, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

We further order that Appellee /Cross

- Appellant recover from Appellant /Cross

- Appellee and its

sureties, if any, for performance on the judgment and all costs, both in this C ourt and the court

below, for which let execution issue. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.5. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29 TH DAY OF MARCH , 2019.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J. , and Larsen, J. (Senior Judge) Larsen, J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
Exhibit 24.8


                              KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



     WHEREAS,  KeySpan  Corporation,  a New York  corporation  (the  "Company"),
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K as prescribed by
said Commission  pursuant to said Act and the rules and regulations  promulgated
thereunder.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in my capacity as a director of the Company,  I do hereby
appoint GERALD LUTERMAN, JOHN J. BISHAR, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and each of
them  severally,  as my  attorneys-in-fact  with power to execute in my name and
place, and in my capacity as a director of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any
amendment  to said  Report  and  any  other  documents  required  in  connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney this 22nd day of
February, 2006.





                                                     /s/Edward D. Miller
#### POTTS v. THE STATE.

(Decided December 16, 1915.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

W. J. Monette, and H. L. Smith, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Brown, J.

No bill of exceptions, no error of record. Affirmed.
§ 382.145 What records concerning training must carriers retain? ( a ) As a carrier that operates aircraft with 19 or more passenger seats, you must incorporate procedures implementing the requirements of this part in the manuals or other guidance or instructional materials provided for the carrier and contract personnel who provide services to passengers, including, but not limited to, pilots, flight attendants, reservation and ticket counter personnel, gate agents, ramp and baggage handling personnel, and passenger service office personnel. You must retain these records for review by the Department on the Department's request. If, upon such review, the Department determines that any portion of these materials must be changed in order to comply with this part, DOT will direct you to make appropriate changes. You must incorporate and implement these changes.
( b ) You must retain for three years individual employee training records demonstrating that all persons required to receive initial and refresher training have done so.
exv10w5






EXHIBIT 10.5




CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED: Certain portions of this
document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential
treatment and, where applicable, have been marked with an asterisk ("[****]")
to denote where omissions have been made. The confidential material has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




EVERGREEN SOLAR, INC.




Amendment dated on or about August 3, 2009




to Master Supply Agreement with




Ralos Vertriebs GmbH dated, dated May 21, 2008



Effective [****], the price of all [****] Products shall be €[****] and all [****] Products
shall be €[****].




	 	 	 
	Evergreen Solar, Inc.

	 	Ralos Vertriebs GmbH
Table of Contents 

Author’s Preface..........................................................................................iii 

Acknowledgments.................................................................................vi 

Abbreviations.....................................................................................viii 

Introduction..........................................................................................1 

Chapter 1 “Wild Bill” Donovan and the Origins of the OSS...................................7 

Chapter 2 A Wartime Organization for Unconventional Warfare.........................31 

Chapter 3 Catoctin and Prince William Parks Join the War Effort........................85 

 

Chapter 4 Converting Catoctin Mountain Park into Military Camps.....................107 

Chapter 5 Transforming Prince William Forest Park into Military Camps..............139 

 

Chapter 6 Instructing for Dangerous Missions..............................................181 

 

Chapter 7 Daily Life in Camp, Park and Town.............................................235 

 

Chapter 8 OSS in Action: Mediterranean and European Theaters........................287 

Chapter 9 OSS in Action: The Pacific and the Far East....................................379 

 

Chapter 10 Postwar Period: End of the OSS and Return to the Park Service.............477 

Chapter 11 Summary and Conclusion..........................................................557 

Bibliography.......................................................................................603 

The Author..........................................................................................617 
ii
#### Clare K. Maloy, Appellant, *v.*Marguerite Montgomery, as Executrix of James H. Montgomery, Deceased, Respondent.

(Argued October 20, 1936;

decided November 24, 1936.)

*631
      *Adolph J. Rodenbeck*and *Thomas P. McCarrick*for appellant.

*J. Emmett O’Brien*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
§ 431.73 Continuing accuracy of license application; application for modification of license. ( a ) A licensee is responsible for the continuing accuracy of representations contained in its application for the entire term of the license.
( b ) After a license has been issued, a licensee must apply to the FAA for modification of the license if— ( 1 ) The licensee proposes to conduct an RLV mission or perform a safety-critical operation in a manner not authorized by the license; or
( 2 ) Any representation contained in the license application that is material to public health and safety or the safety of property is no longer accurate and complete or does not reflect the licensee's procedures governing the actual conduct of an RLV mission. A change is material to public health and safety or the safety of property if it alters or affects the— ( i ) Mission rules, procedures, checklists, emergency plans, and contingency abort plans, if any, submitted in accordance with § 431.39
( ii ) Class of payload;
( iii ) Type of RLV;
( iv ) Any safety-critical system;
( v ) Type and container of the hazardous material carried by the vehicle;
( vi ) Flight trajectory;
( vii ) Launch site or reentry site or other landing location; or
( viii ) Any safety system, policy, procedure, requirement, criteria, or standard.
( c ) An application to modify an RLV mission license must be prepared and submitted in accordance with part 413 of this chapter. The licensee must indicate any part of its license or license application that would be changed or affected by a proposed modification.
( d ) The FAA reviews determinations and approvals required by this chapter to determine whether they remain valid after submission of a proposed modification.
( e ) Upon approval of a modification, the FAA issues either a written approval to the licensee or a license order amending the license if a stated term or condition of the license is changed, added, or deleted. An approval has the full force and effect of a license order and is part of the licensing record.
( f ) The Administrator may determine that a modification to a license issued under this part must comply with the requirements in part 450 of this chapter. The Administrator will base the determination on the extent and complexity of the modification, whether the applicant proposes to modify multiple parts of the application, or if the application requires significant evaluation.
[Docket No. FAA-1999-5535, 65 FR 56658, Sept. 19, 2000, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2019-0229, Amdt. 431-7, 85 FR 79717, Dec. 10, 2020]
§ 25.1441 Oxygen equipment and supply. ( a ) If certification with supplemental oxygen equipment is requested, the equipment must meet the requirements of this section and §§ 25.1443 through 25.1453.
( b ) The oxygen system must be free from hazards in itself, in its method of operation, and in its effect upon other components.
( c ) There must be a means to allow the crew to readily determine, during flight, the quantity of oxygen available in each source of supply.
( d ) The oxygen flow rate and the oxygen equipment for airplanes for which certification for operation above 40,000 feet is requested must be approved.
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.721 Complaints.

Within fifteen (15) days of the filing of a contract, any interested person may file with the Office of Aviation Analysis, X-50, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590, a complaint with respect to the contract setting forth the basis for such complaint and all pertinent information in support of same. A copy of the complaint shall be served upon the air carrier filing the contract and upon each of the persons served with such contract pursuant to § 302.720.
Exhibit
23.1
 
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:
 
 (1)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74398) of The Knot, Inc.,
 (2)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96179) of The Knot, Inc.,
 (3)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41960) of The Knot, Inc.,
 (4)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-113824) of The Knot, Inc.,
 (5)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141275) of The Knot, Inc., and
 (6)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-159455) of The Knot, Inc.
 
 of our
reports dated March 12, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of The Knot, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
The Knot, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  
 
 
 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
  New York,
New York
 March 12,
2010
exv10w10w1



 



EXHIBIT 10.10.1



AMENDMENT TO THE

MERISTAR HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN



Pursuant to the approval by the Board of Directors of MeriStar Hotels &
Resorts, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Company’s shareholders at the Company’s
2002 Annual Meeting, the MeriStar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is amended, effective August 1, 2002, as follows:



	 	1.	 	The Plan shall now be called the Interstate Hotels & Resorts,
Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan and every place that the word
“MeriStar” is used in the Plan shall be replaced by the word
“Interstate”.
	 
	 	2.	 	The following paragraph (c) shall be added to Section 12.4 of
the Plan:
	 
	 	 	 	“(c) No adjustment to the maximum number of shares that may be
purchased under the Plan shall be made in respect of any reverse
stock split approved at the Company’s 2002 Annual Meeting of
stockholders that is effected by the Company in accordance with
such approval.”



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has caused this amendment
to the Plan to be duly executed in its corporate name this 1st day of August,
2002.



	 
	INTERSTATE HOTELS & RESORTS, INC
	 
	______________________________

Christopher L. Bennett

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary
#### § 234.9 Reporting of on-time performance codes.

No later than the 15th day of each month, each reporting carrier shall deliver, or arrange to have delivered, to each system vendor, as defined in 14 CFR part 255, the on-time performance codes required to be determined above. Carriers may report the codes by insuring that they are included in basic schedule tapes provided to CRS vendors or by providing a separate tape that will permit the CRS vendors to match the performance codes with basic schedule tapes.
[Civ. No. 1578.

Third Appellate District.

December 15, 1916.]

#### SUPERIOR CALIFORNIA FRUIT LAND COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. E. F. MAY, Appellant.

Quieting Title — Specific Performance.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of *Superior California Fruit Land Company*v. *Grossman, ante,*p. 357.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County. H. M. Albery, Judge.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in *Superior California Fruit Land Company*v. *Grossman, ante,*p. 357.

R. H. Countryman, for Appellant.

De Ligne & Jones, and H. T. Hiatt, for Respondents.

PLUMMER, J., *pro*tem.

This action, No. 1578, is a companion cause of action to No. 1577, *Superior California Fruit Land Company*v. *Grossman, ante,*p. 357, this day decided, *805and for the reasons therein given the judgment in this action is hereby affirmed.

Chipman, P. J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 12, 1917.
#### § 437.27 Pre-flight and post-flight operations.

An applicant must demonstrate how it will meet the requirements of § 437.53(a) and (b) to establish a safety clear zone and verify that the public is outside that zone before and during any hazardous operation.
#### LEONARD v FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA

Case No. 90-056 AP

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County

January 23, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

David P. Leonard, pro se.

Robert D. Friedman, Esquire, for appellee.

Before GOLDMAN, DONNER, FULLER, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

DONNER, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying Defendant’s Request to Vacate Final Judgment and Properly Serve Defendant. In this case the return of service was deficient in that there was no seal by the notary placed on the document which amounted to a failure to comply with the appropriate statute.

*8Rule 1.070(b) of the *Florida Rules of Civil Procedure,*provides:

> . . . When so appointed, the person serving process shall make proof of service by *affidavit*promptly and in any event within the time during which the person served must respond to the process, (emphasis added)

Accordingly, the trial court should have granted Appellant’s Request to Vacate Final Judgment and to Properly Serve Defendant and therefore we reverse the judgment entered below.

GOLDMAN, FULLER, JJ., Concur.
#### In the Matter of Eugenia Quinlan, Respondent. Comptroller of the City of New York et al., Appellants.

(Submitted September 28, 1936;

decided October 6, 1936.)

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 271 N. Y. 396.)