alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 336.11 Definitions. *For purposes of this subpart:* ( a ) *Bank holding company* has the meaning given to such term in section 2 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841(a)).
( b ) A *consultant* for an insured depository institution or other company shall include only individuals who work directly on matters for, or on behalf of, such institution or other company.
( c ) *Control* has the meaning given to such term in section 336.3(b), and a foreign bank shall be deemed to control any insured branch of the foreign bank.
( d ) *Depository institution* means any bank or savings association, including a branch of a foreign bank, if such branch is located in the United States.
( e ) *Foreign bank* means any bank or company described in section 8(a) of the International Banking Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3106(a)).
( f ) *Savings and loan holding company* has the meaning given to such term in section 10(a)(1)(D) of the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1467a(a)(1)(D)).
( g ) A *senior examiner* for an insured depository institution means an officer or employee of the FDIC— ( 1 ) who has been authorized by the FDIC to conduct examinations or inspections of insured depository institutions on behalf of the FDIC;
( 2 ) who has been assigned continuing, broad, and lead responsibility for the examination or inspection of the institution;
( 3 ) who routinely interacts with officers or employees of the institution or its affiliates; and
( 4 ) whose responsibilities with respect to the institution represent a substantial portion of the FDIC officer or employee's overall responsibilities.
Editorial Note on Part 294
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 294 appear at 84 FR 15934, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 294.3 General requirements for Canadian charter air taxi operators. A Canadian charter air taxi operator shall conduct charter air service between the United States and Canada only if it: ( a ) Has been registered by the Department under this part;
( b ) Does not directly or indirectly utilize large aircraft in charter air services;
( c ) Has and maintains in effect liability insurance coverage that complies with the requirements set forth in subpart E of this part and has and maintains a current certificate of insurance evidencing such coverage on file with the Department;
( d ) Has and maintains in effect and on file with the Department a signed counterpart of Agreement 18900 (OST Form 4523) and complies with all other requirements of part 203 of this chapter;
( e ) Has effective authority from the Government of Canada to conduct charter air service between the United States and Canada.
( f ) Has been granted Federal Aviation Administration operations specifications required under part 129 of this title (the Federal Aviation Regulations);
( g ) Is substantially owned and effectively controlled by Canadian citizens, or the Government of Canada, or a combination of both; and
( h ) Complies with the terms, conditions, and limitations of this part.
(The reporting requirements contained in paragraph (d) were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3024-0064) [ER-1257, 46 FR 52591, Oct. 27, 1981, as amended by ER-1332, 48 FR 8051, Feb. 25, 1983; ER-1342, 48 FR 31015, July 6, 1983; Doc. No. 47939, 57 FR 40102, Sept. 2, 1992; 71 FR 49347, Aug. 23, 2006]
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ADDED BY
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SunCoast Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John T. Stafford,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
         results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
         by the Report.









Date:  November 5, 2002             By:  /s/ John T. Stafford
      ------------------                 --------------------------------------
                                         John T. Stafford, President and Chief
                                           Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SunCoast Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John S. Wilks, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added
by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                                                                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ John S. Wilks                                                                                    
|                   |  |     |  | John S. Wilks, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              78
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          58,353
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        202,492
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,165
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                267
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               14
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     257,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 258,165
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,823
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   787
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,610
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,610
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     79
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,531
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                     88,000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   88,000
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.43
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,428
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,855
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,070
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,070
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****York Butte quadrangle, Oregon :7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:42123-D 7/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000932085
 
January 24, 2018
ex105.htm


    Exhibit
10.5

     

    AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    


    This
amendment to Executive Employment Agreement is executed this date November 10,
2009 by and between Gen2Media Corporation (“Company”) and Thomas Moreland
(“Employee”).

    


     

    
      	
              1.  

            	
              This
      agreement amends the Executive Employment Agreement between the parties
      dated September 22, 2008 as amended March 20,
      2009(“Agreement”).

            


    

     

    


     

    
      	
              2.  

            	
              The
      Agreement is hereby amended to provide for additional incentive based
      compensation related to restricted stock and stock options based on Mr.
      Moreland’s performance and appointment to the roles of Secretary and
      Treasurer of the Company.

            


    

     

    


     

    
      	
              3.  

            	
              The
      Company hereby grants Mr. Moreland 500,000 restricted
      shares.  Additionally, the Company hereby awards 1,000,000 stock
      options at a strike price of $0.30, that vest over the remaining life of
      contract.  Such shares and Options shall remain restricted for a
      period of two years from the date of this
  amendment.

            


    

     

    


     

    
      	
              4.  

            	
              This
      amendment shall also extend Mr. Moreland’s contract through December 31,
      2012.

            


    

     

    


     

    
      	
              5.  

            	
              Other
      than specifically amended hereby, all other terms and provisions of the
      Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.

            


    

     

    


     

    Gen2Media
Corporation:                                                                           Employee:

     

    


     

    


     

    _________________________                                                      __________________________

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              Mark
      Argenti, Chairman and CEO

            	
              Thomas
      Moreland, Chief Financial Officer
#### § 420.29 Launch site location review for unproven launch vehicles.

An applicant for a license to operate a launch site for an unproven launch vehicle shall provide a clear and convincing demonstration that its proposed launch site location provides an equivalent level of safety to that required by this part.
** **

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I,Ivar S. Chhina, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, of InterDentService Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30,2006 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

(2)information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|            |   | /s/ IVAR S. CHHINA                      |
|------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|       |   | Ivar S. Chhina                          |
|       |   | President, Chief  Executive Officer and |
|       |   | Chairman                                |
| ** ** |   | August 14, 2006                         |

 

 

----
#### ECKSTEIN v. UNITED STATES

[80 C. Cls. 725; 296 U. S. 582]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court October 14, 1935.
#### § 415.125 Unique safety policies, requirements and practices.

An applicant's safety review document must identify any public safety-related policy, requirement, or practice that is unique to the proposed launch, or series of launches, as required by § 417.127 of this chapter. An applicant's safety review document must describe how each unique safety policy, requirement, or practice ensures the safety of the public.
§ 450.110 Physical containment. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to the use of physical containment as a hazard control strategy for the flight, or phase of flight, of a launch or reentry vehicle to meet the safety criteria of § 450.101(a), (b), and (c).
( b ) *Containment.* To use physical containment as a hazard control strategy, an operator must— ( 1 ) Develop the flight hazard area in accordance with § 450.133;
( 2 ) Ensure that the launch vehicle does not have sufficient energy for any hazards associated with its flight to reach outside the flight hazard area;
( 3 ) Ensure the hazard area is clear of the public and critical assets; and
( 4 ) Apply other mitigation measures necessary to ensure no public or critical asset exposure to hazards, such as control of public access or wind placards.
( c ) *Application requirements.* An applicant must submit in its application the following: ( 1 ) A demonstration that the launch vehicle does not have sufficient energy for any hazards associated with its flight to reach outside the flight hazard area developed in accordance with § 450.133; and
( 2 ) A description of the methods used to ensure that flight hazard areas are cleared of the public and critical assets.
#### CITY OF HUNTSVILLE v. GOODENRATH.

(Decided February 1, 1916.)

Appeal from Madison Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. D. W. Speake.

David A. Grayson, for appellant. S. S. Pleasants, for appellee. .

Per Curiam.

Error confessed and reversed and remanded by agreement.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7611** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ZACHARY LIVERMAN, a/k/a Zack , D efendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. ( 2:95

- cr - 00151

- FBS

- 8 )

Submitted : April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Zacha ry Liverman, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Zacha ry Liverman appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2) (2006) motion. The district court may reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) “if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by t he Sentencing Commission.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). A reduction “is not consistent with [the Commission’s] policy statement and therefore is not authorized under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2)” if the amendment “does not have the effect of lowering the defendant’ s applicable guideline range.” USSG
§ 1B1.10(a)(2)(B) (2011). The district court correctly determined that it lacked authority to reduce Liverman’s sentence under Amendment 750 and § 3582(c)(2), because the amendment did not have the effect of lowering h is Guidelines range. Under the new Guidelines, a level thirty

- six applies to cocaine base quantities of between 2.8 kilograms and less than 8.4 kilograms. See USSG § 2D1.1(c)(3) (2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordin gly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Liverman , No. 2:95

- cr - 00151

- FBS

- 8 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 10, & entered Nov. 14, 2011) **.** We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the mat erials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### §§ 415.16-415.20 [Reserved]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DANIEL BERNARD CRAWFORD, )

)

 Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4173

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

 Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed February 2, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; Donald G. Jacobson, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
§ 417.9 Launch site responsibility. ( a ) A launch operator must ensure that launch processing at a launch site in the United States satisfies the requirements of this part. Launch processing at a launch site outside the United States may be subject to the requirements of the governing jurisdiction.
( b ) For a launch from a launch site licensed under part 420 of this chapter, a launch operator must— ( 1 ) Conduct its operations as required by any agreements that the launch site operator has with any Federal and local authorities under part 420 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) Coordinate with the launch site operator and provide any information on its activities and potential hazards necessary for the launch site operator to determine how to protect any other launch operator, person, or property at the launch site as required by the launch site operator's obligations under § 420.55 of this chapter.
( c ) For a launch from an exclusive-use site, where there is no licensed launch site operator, a launch operator must satisfy the requirements of this part and the public safety requirements of part 420 of this chapter. This subpart does not apply to licensed launches occurring from Federal launch ranges.
§ 23.2510 Equipment, systems, and installations. For any airplane system or equipment whose failure or abnormal operation has not been specifically addressed by another requirement in this part, the applicant must design and install each system and equipment, such that there is a logical and acceptable inverse relationship between the average probability and the severity of failure conditions to the extent that: ( a ) Each catastrophic failure condition is extremely improbable;
( b ) Each hazardous failure condition is extremely remote; and
( c ) Each major failure condition is remote.
§ 48.105 Registration: Small unmanned aircraft intended exclusively for limited recreational operations. ( a ) *Certificate of Aircraft Registration.* A Certificate of Aircraft Registration issued in accordance with § 48.110 for small unmanned aircraft to be operated exclusively in compliance with 49 U.S.C. 44809 constitutes registration for all the small unmanned aircraft used exclusively for operations in compliance with 49 U.S.C. 44809 owned by the individual identified on the application.
( b ) *Effective date of registration.* An aircraft is registered when the applicant receives a Certificate of Aircraft Registration. The effective date of registration is shown by the date of issue on the Certificate of Aircraft Registration issued under this part.
( c ) *Registration renewal.* A Certificate of Aircraft registration issued under this part expires 3 years after the date of issue unless it is renewed. ( 1 ) The holder of a Certificate of Aircraft Registration must renew the Certificate by verifying, in a form and manner prescribed by the Administrator, that the information provided in accordance with § 48.110 is accurate and if it is not, provide updated information. The verification may take place at any time within the six months preceding the month in which the Certificate of Aircraft registration expires.
( 2 ) A certificate issued under this paragraph expires three years from the expiration date of the previous certificate.
( d ) *Other events affecting effectiveness of Certificate.* Each Certificate of Aircraft Registration issued by the FAA under this part is effective, unless registration has ended by reason of having been revoked, canceled or expired, or until the date upon which one of the following events occurs: ( 1 ) The holder of the Certificate of Aircraft Registration loses U.S. citizenship.
( 2 ) Thirty days have elapsed since the death of the holder of the Certificate of Aircraft Registration.
( 3 ) The owner, if an individual who is not a citizen of the United States, loses status as a resident alien, unless that person becomes a citizen of the United States at the same time.
[Doc. No. FAA-2015-7396; Amdt. No. 48-1; 80 FR 78645, Dec. 16, 2015. Redesignated and amended by Doc. No. FAA-2019-1100; Amdt. No. 48-3, 86 FR 4504, Jan. 15, 2021]