alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 313.4 Major regulatory actions. ( a ) Any initial, recommended, tentative or final decision, opinion, order, or final rule is a major regulatory action requiring an energy statement, if it: ( 1 ) May cause a near-term net annual change in aircraft fuel consumption of 10 million (10,000,000) gallons or more, compared to the probable consumption of fuel were the action not to be taken; or
( 2 ) Is specifically so designated by DOT because of its precedential value, substantial controversy with respect to energy conservation and efficiency, or other unusual circumstances.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the following types of actions shall not be deemed as major regulatory actions requiring an energy statement: ( 1 ) Tariff suspension orders under section 41509 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, emergency exemptions or temporary exemptions not exceeding 24 months under section 40109 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII and other proceedings in which timely action is of the essence;
( 2 ) Orders instituting or declining to institute investigations or rulemaking, setting or declining to set applications for hearing, on reconsideration, or on requests for stay;
( 3 ) Other procedural or interlocutory orders;
( 4 ) Actions taken under delegated authority; and
( 5 ) Issuance of a certificate where no determination of public convenience and necessity is required.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(1) of this section, DOT may provide that an energy statement shall not be prepared in a proceeding which may result in a major regulatory action, if it finds that: ( 1 ) The inclusion of an energy statement is not consistent with the exercise of DOT's authority under the Statute or other law;
( 2 ) The inclusion of an energy statement is not practicable because of time constraints, lack of information, or other unusual circumstances; or
( 3 ) The action is taken under laws designed to protect the public health or safety.
[Doc. No. 82, 50 FR 2425, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended at 60 FR 43529, Aug. 22, 1995; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15938, Apr. 16, 2019]
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the companys most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter reasonably likely to
materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of the internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or the
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  /s/ Lawrence D. BainLawrence D. BainChief Executive Officer
Order entered October 19 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00315
- CV
KAREN M. STEPHENS
- BUTLER, Appellant

V. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A THE BAN K OF NE W YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERT IFICATEHOLDERS OF TH E CWABS, INC., ASSET
BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2015
- 16, ITS SUCCESSORS A ND ASSIGNS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 15
- 05354
- D



### O RDER
T he reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated July 29, 2016, we informed appellant the court reporter notified us that the reporter’s record had not been filed because appellants had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for o r made arrangements to pay for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification she had requested the record and had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, or had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to provide the required documentation within ten days might result in the appeal being ordered submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not provided the requireddocumentation or other wise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the reporter’s

record. Therefore, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. Appellant’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on December 21, 1999, Johnson Matthey, Inc., Custom Pharmaceuticals Department, 2003 
                    ( print page 30615)
                    Nolte Drive, West Deptford, New Jersey 08066, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IDifenoxin (9168)
IPropiram (9649)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IICodeine (9050)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIAlfentanil (9737)
IISufentanil (9740)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk to supply final dosage form manufacturers. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration. Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than July 11, 2000. Dated: May 1, 2000. John H. King, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 00-11892 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements contained in Item 1 on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements. Figures are rounded to the nearest 100,000 (except EPS).
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  232,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    119,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               387,700
<PP&E>                                         851,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 534,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 776,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          201,000
<BONDS>                                         81,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     423,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   776,800
<SALES>                                        493,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               493,200
<CGS>                                          348,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  348,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.49


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1  IDEAEDGE, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James Collas, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of IdeaEdge, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) [Paragraph omitted]; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 8, 2009/s/ James CollasJames CollasChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 382.71 What other aircraft accessibility requirements apply to carriers? ( a ) As a carrier, you must maintain all aircraft accessibility features in proper working order.
( b ) You must ensure that any replacement or refurbishing of the aircraft cabin or its elements does not reduce the accessibility of that element to a level below that specified for new aircraft in this part.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2004-19482, 73 FR 27665, May 13, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 11471, Mar. 18, 2009]
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07077]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9069]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Yoko Ono: One Woman Show 1960-1971''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Yoko Ono: One Woman Show 1960-1971'', 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of 
Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about May 17, 2015, until on 
or about September 7, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact the Office of the Legal Adviser, 
U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), 
Washington, DC 20522-0505, telephone (202-632-6471), or email at 
section2459@state.gov.

    Dated: March 18, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-07077 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 43
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous technical amendments to this part 43, see Amdt. 43-3, 31 FR 3336, Mar. 3, 1966, and Amdt. 43-6, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 43.2 Records of overhaul and rebuilding. ( a ) No person may describe in any required maintenance entry or form an aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance, or component part as being overhauled unless— ( 1 ) Using methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the Administrator, it has been disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as necessary, and reassembled; and
( 2 ) It has been tested in accordance with approved standards and technical data, or in accordance with current standards and technical data acceptable to the Administrator, which have been developed and documented by the holder of the type certificate, supplemental type certificate, or a material, part, process, or appliance approval under part 21 of this chapter.
( b ) No person may describe in any required maintenance entry or form an aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance, or component part as being rebuilt unless it has been disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as necessary, reassembled, and tested to the same tolerances and limits as a new item, using either new parts or used parts that either conform to new part tolerances and limits or to approved oversized or undersized dimensions.
[Amdt. 43-23, 47 FR 41084, Sept. 16, 1982, as amended by Amdt. 43-43, 74 FR 53394, Oct. 16, 2009]
Order filed November 30, 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00589

- CV

____________ SYLVIA COOKE , Appellant

V.

RACHEL BAIER , Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cau se N o. CV

- 0087510



### ORDER
This appeal is from a judgment signed March 30, 2021 . The notice of appeal
was filed October 15, 2021

. It appears the notice of appeal is untimely, but we are
unable to make that determination because the clerk ’ s record has not been f iled.
We received notice from the clerk ’ s office that appellant has not designated a
clerk ’ s record 1 and t he notice does not reflect appellant ha s made arrangements to

1 We note that Tex. R. App. P. 34.5 sets forth the items to be included in the clerk ’ s record absent a designation.pay for the clerk ’ s record. 2 Appellant has filed a motion to extend ti m e to file the

not ice of appeal , which cannot be de termined in the absence of an y clerk ’ s record

. Accordingly, we enter the following order.

The Galveston County District Clerk is directed to file a clerk ’ s record on or
before December 3, 2021 , containing ( 1 ) the court ’ s judgment ; (2) any request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, any post

- judgment motion, and the court ’ s order on the motion ; and ( 3 ) t he notice of appea l.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.

2 An appeal is subject to dismissal for f ailure to arrange payment for the clerk’s record

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c)
, 37.3(b).
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.301 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart sets forth the specific rules applicable to proceedings for exemptions under sections 40109 and 41714 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, including the granting of emergency exemptions, as well as applications for frequency allocations and other limited authority under international agreements. Except as modified by this subpart, the provisions of subpart A of this part apply.
( b ) Proceedings for the issuance of exemptions by regulation are subject to the provisions governing rulemaking.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, David J Cutler, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Multi-Link Telecommunications, Inc., (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10QSB for the nine months ended March 31,
2004 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1034, and
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Date:  October 11, 2004





By  /s/David J Cutler
    -----------------------------------
    David J Cutler
    Chief Executive Officer
    Chief Financial Officer




4

3
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4628 

To provide for a 1-year extension of the Public-Private Partnership Advisory 

Council to End Human Trafficking. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for a 1-year extension of the Public-Private 

Partnership Advisory Council to End Human Trafficking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Human Trafficking 

5 Council Extension Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AD7 VISORY COUNCIL TO END HUMAN TRAF8 FICKING. 

9 Section 705 of the Public-Private Partnership Advi10 sory Council to End Human Trafficking Act (title VII of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4628 IS

1 Public Law 115–393) is amended by striking ‘‘September 

2 30, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 406.139 Joint procedural or discovery schedule. ( a ) *General.* The parties may agree to submit a schedule for filing all prehearing motions or for conducting discovery or both.
( b ) *Form and content of schedule.* If the parties agree to a joint procedural or discovery schedule, one of the parties must file with the Federal Docket Management System and serve the joint schedule, setting forth the dates to which the parties have agreed. One of the parties must draft an order establishing a joint schedule for the administrative law judge. ( 1 ) The joint schedule may include, but need not be limited to, times for requests for discovery, any objections to discovery requests, responses to discovery requests, submission of prehearing motions, responses to prehearing motions, exchange of exhibits to be introduced at the hearing, and lists of witnesses that may be called at the hearing.
( 2 ) Each party must sign the original joint schedule.
( c ) *Time.* The parties may agree to submit all prehearing motions and responses and may agree to close discovery in the proceedings under the joint schedule within a reasonable time before the date of the hearing, but not later than 15 days before the hearing.
( d ) *Order establishing joint schedule.* The administrative law judge must approve the joint schedule filed by the parties by signing the joint schedule and filing it with the Federal Docket Management System.
( e ) *Disputes.* The administrative law judge must resolve any dispute regarding discovery or regarding compliance with the joint schedule as soon as possible so that the parties may continue to comply with the joint schedule.
( f ) *Sanctions for failure to comply with joint schedule.* If a party fails to comply with the order establishing a joint schedule, the administrative law judge may direct that party to comply with a motion to compel discovery; or, limited to the extent of the party's failure to comply with a motion or discovery request, the administrative law judge may: ( 1 ) Strike that portion of a party's pleadings;
( 2 ) Preclude prehearing or discovery motions by that party;
( 3 ) Preclude admission of that portion of a party's evidence at the hearing; or
( 4 ) Preclude that portion of the testimony of that party's witnesses at the hearing.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-8607, 66 FR 2180, Jan. 10, 2001, as amended at 72 FR 68477, Dec. 5, 2007]