alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
06/22/2012 15:12 '2023313933 KIRSTEIN&YOUI-IGPLLC:
. PAGE 02/ El4



### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF 

### TRANSPORTATION



### FEDERAL A

### VIATJON. ADMINIS'TRATION ') I'D the Matter of: ) FDMS NO.**FAA~2012**..0468 ) 

### Aero Micronesia, Inc. ) FAA CASE NO 2011wP350018 dba Asia Pacific Airlines ) ) 

### ResP,ondent ) TO: CHIEF 

### JUDGE RONNIE A. 

### YODER NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

### Respondent, Aero Micronesia, 

### Inc. dba Asia 

### Pacific Airlines, herby 

### notifies the United States Department of 

### T1·ansportc.'\tiou, Office of Hearings, and the 

### Complainant, pursuant to 14 

### C.F.R. § 13;204(b), that it shall 

### be represe11ted in the

### above~stated action by 

### the following atte>meys:

1100/(;00**~** David M. Kirstein Joanne W. Young 

### Lyndsey 

### M.. Grunewald F.;itstein & 

### YouAJg, 

### PLLC 1750 K Street NW, Suite 200 Washington1 DC 20006 

### TEL: 202.331.3348 FAX: 202.331.3933 

### dkirstein@yklaw.c()t.n jyoung@yklaw.com lgmoewald@ykla.w.com.**s~o** + 

### 1

G11L98611GOG**X~j** 1111:so GLOZ/9G/8005/22/2012 15:12 2023313933 

### KlRSTEIN&YOUNGPLLC PAGE El3/04

All**~ozrununications,** 

### notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully requested to be fo1-warded
as follows: 

### David M. Kirstein Kirstein & Young, PLLC 1750 K Street NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20006 TEL: 202.3 31.3348 FAX: 202.331.3933 

### Respectfully submitted,

Djited: Julle**22~** 

### 2012


### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I 

### ce:t.1ify that on this date l have placed 

### in the United States mail, postage prepaid, the ex(;cuted origina1 a.n.d faxed one copy ofthe Notice ofAppearance, addressed as follows:
Federal Aviation Ad.ministratioll 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington. DC 20591 

### Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur W;dght Building- Suite 2Wl00 Facsimile: (202) 493-5142
1 cel."tify 

### that on this date I have placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, a true copy ofthe Notice ofAppearance, and faxed 

### one copy ofthe Notice 

### of Appearance, addressed as 

### follows:
2

P00/800 121 Sl'lO +**6PL~88P606 XV~**  pp:so**6L06/~6/90**06/22/2B12 15:12 2023:::113933

Don Bobertz, 

### Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe 

### Rcgi.on.al Counsel, 

### AWP-7 :PO Bo" 

### 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007**F~:310~725-6816**
Dated: Jtme 22, 2012

1d 

### 'rstein Kir ein & 

### Young, PLLC 1 50 K Street NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 

### 20006 

### Coun,selfor Respondem, .4.ero Micronesia, Inc.



### 3

1100/1100**~ s~o**  +**KIRST~IN&YOUNGPLLC**



### 1l1e Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder Chief Administrative Law Judge U.S. Departmr;m ofTransportation 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 FAX: 202-366-7536 PAGF P.ld/04**611L~8611606 X~~**  1111:ao**6L06/~6/80**
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

The Board of Directors 

Pulaski Financial Corp.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-128997) on Form S-3D and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-32986, 333-84392,333-84515 and No. 333-112962) on Form S-8 of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) of our report dated December 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, and the relatedconsolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2005, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting as of September 30, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005, which reports appear in the September 30, 2005, annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.

 

Our report dated December 9, 2005, on management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005, expresses our opinion that the Company did not maintain effective internal control overfinancial reporting as of September 30, 2005 because of the effect of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company had ineffective policies andprocedures relating to the accounting for certain derivative financial instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, *Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities* (SFAS 133). Specifically, theCompany’s policies and procedures did not provide for sufficient testing and verification of the criteria for the “short-cut” method to ensure proper application of the provisions of SFAS 133 at inception for certain derivativefinancial instruments. This resulted in the restatement of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the first three quarters of 2005. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

St. Louis, Missouri 

December 13, 2005
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Motor vehicle use map.Willamette National Forest. Middle Fork Ranger District, North Half, Oregon**
 
2010: Front | Back| Errata
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:W 66/11/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:000930316
 
January 12, 2018
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Barry W. Tackett, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Barry W. Tackett
Barry W. Tackett, Principal Financial Officer

Date: April 14, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### § 431.61 Incorporation of payload reentry determination in license application.

A favorable payload reentry determination issued for a payload or class of payload may be included by an RLV mission license applicant as part of its application. Before the conduct of an RLV mission involving a payload approved for reentry, any change in information provided under § 431.57 must be reported by the licensee in accordance with § 413.17 of this chapter. The FAA determines whether a favorable payload reentry determination remains valid and may conduct an additional payload reentry review.
§ 29.1015 Oil tank tests. Each oil tank must be designed and installed so that— ( a ) It can withstand, without failure, any vibration, inertia, and fluid loads to which it may be subjected in operation; and
( b ) It meets the requirements of § 29.965, except that instead of the pressure specified in § 29.965(b)— ( 1 ) For pressurized tanks used with a turbine engine, the test pressure may not be less than 5 p.s.i. plus the maximum operating pressure of the tank; and
( 2 ) For all other tanks, the test pressure may not be less than 5 p.s.i.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-10, 39 FR 35462, Oct. 1, 1974]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

and the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost
Plus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Barry J. Feld, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, and Thomas D. Willardson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|/s/ BARRY J. FELD                                               
|Barry J. Feld                                                   
|Chief Executive Officer, President (Principal Executive Officer)
|                                                                
|September 7, 2006                                               



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|/s/ THOMAS D. WILLARDSON                                                       
|Thomas D. Willardson                                                           
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|                                                                               
|September 7, 2006
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements for the three month period ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<NAME>   Contessa Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>         1
<CURRENCY>           $

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         132,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 343,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          152,044
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           287
<OTHER-SE>                                     191,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,571
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (361,166)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (361,166)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (361,166)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (361,166)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Knot, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Mueller, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            the Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




By:
                            /s/ John P. MuellerJohn
      P. Mueller
                              Chief
      Financial
Officer




Date:
March 13, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4256 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4256

    To prohibit the use of funds to purchase goods or services from 
                 Communist Chinese military companies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2020

  Ms. McSally introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the use of funds to purchase goods or services from 
                 Communist Chinese military companies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Funds to China's Military Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO PURCHASE GOODS OR SERVICES FROM 
              COMMUNIST CHINESE MILITARY COMPANIES.

    (a) In General.--None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or 
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 and available for 
obligation as of the date of the enactment of this Act, or authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 or 
any fiscal year thereafter, may be obligated or expended to purchase 
goods or services from a person on the list required by section 1237(b) 
of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note).
    (b) Application to Private Entities and State and Local 
Governments.--
            (1) In general.--The prohibition under subsection (a) 
        includes a prohibition on the obligation or expenditure of 
        funds described in that subsection for the purchase of goods or 
        services from persons described in that subsection by a private 
        entity or a State or local government that received such funds 
        through a grant or any other means.
            (2) Certification required to receive future funds.--On and 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, the head of an 
        executive agency may not provide funds described in subsection 
        (a) to a private entity or a State or local government unless 
        the entity or government certifies that the entity or 
        government, as the case may be, is not purchasing goods or 
        services from a person described in subsection (a).
    (c) Executive Agency Defined.--In this section, the term 
``executive agency'' has the meaning given that term in section 133 of 
title 41, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                      HOST MARRIOTT, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                         AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
                          (in millions, except ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  1999  1998  1997  1996  1995
                                                  ----  ----  ----  ----  ----
<S>                                               <C>   <C>   <C>   <C>   <C>
Income from operations before income taxes....... $240  $174  $ 83  $ (8) $(75)
  Add (deduct):
  Fixed charges..................................  518   415   364   283   206
  Capitalized interest...........................   (7)   (4)   (1)   (3)   (5)
  Amortization of capitalized interest...........    6     6     5     7     6
  Net gains (losses) related to certain 50% or
   less owned affiliate..........................   (6)   (1)   (1)    1     2
  Minority interest in consolidated affiliates...   21    52    31     6     2
                                                  ----  ----  ----  ----  ----
  Adjusted earnings.............................. $772  $642  $481  $286  $136
                                                  ====  ====  ====  ====  ====
Fixed charges:
  Interest on indebtedness and amortization of
   deferred financing costs...................... $469  $335  $288  $237  $178
  Dividends on convertible preferred securities
   of subsidiary trust...........................  --     37    37     3   --
  Distributions on preferred limited partner
   units.........................................    6   --    --    --    --
  Portion of rents representative of the interest
   factor........................................   43    43    39    33    17
  Debt service guarantee interest expense of
   unconsolidated affiliates.....................  --    --    --     10    11
                                                  ----  ----  ----  ----  ----
  Total fixed charges and preferred stock
   dividends..................................... $518  $415  $364  $283  $206
                                                  ====  ====  ====  ====  ====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred
 stock dividends................................. 1.49  1.54  1.32  1.01   --
Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges and
 preferred stock dividends.......................  --    --    --    --     70
</TABLE>
Second Department,

November, 1999

(November 1, 1999)

#### Eileen Alphonse, Respondent, v UBJ Inc., Trading as Farm Country Outlet, et al., Appellants.

[697 NYS2d 324]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated April 16, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

By order dated September 18, 1998, the Supreme Court granted a 60-day conditional order precluding the plaintiff from offering any evidence in support of the allegations in her complaint unless she complied with the defendants’ outstanding discovery demands. It is undisputed that the plaintiffs attorney consented to the conditional order of preclusion. When the plaintiff failed to comply with the conditional order, the defendants moved for summary judgment, but the Supreme Court denied their motion.

The defendants contend that the court erred in excusing the plaintiffs failure to comply with the conditional order, and in denying their motion for summary judgment. We agree. When the plaintiff failed to timely comply with the conditional order of preclusion, the order became absolute *(see, Barriga v Sapo,*250 AD2d 795; *Michaud v City of New York,*242 AD2d 369). To be relieved from an order of preclusion, a plaintiff is required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the failure to timely comply with the discovery demands, and the existence of a meritorious cause of action *(see, Barriga v Sapo, supra; Ludwigsen v American Transp. Lines,*242 AD2d 523; *Cobble Hill Nursing Home v Griffo,*240 AD2d 459). The plaintiff failed to sustain that burden. Accordingly, since the plaintiff is precluded from proving the essential elements of her case at trial, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment must be granted *(see, Barriga v Sapo,*supra;*DiPietro v Duhl,*227 AD2d 515). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.311 Emergency exemptions. ( a ) *Shortened procedures.* When required by the circumstances and consistent with the public interest, the Department may take action, without notice, on exemption applications prior to the expiration of the normal period for filing answers and replies. When required in a particular proceeding, the Department may specify a lesser time for the filing of answers and replies, and notify interested persons of this time period.
( b ) ( 1 ) *Applications.* Applications for emergency exemption need not conform to the requirements of this subpart or of subpart A of this part (except as provided in this section and in § 302.303(d) concerning emergency cabotage requests). However, an application for emergency exemption must normally be in writing and must state in detail the facts and evidence that support the application, the grounds for the exemption, and the public interest basis for the authority sought. In addition, the application shall state specific reasons that justify departure from the normal exemption application procedures. The application shall also identify those persons notified as required by paragraph (c) of this section. The Department may require additional information from any applicant before acting on an application.
( 2 ) *Oral requests.* The Department will consider oral requests, including telephone requests, for emergency exemption authority under this section in circumstances that do not permit the immediate filing of a written application. All oral requests must, however, provide the information required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, except that actual evidence in support of the application need not be tendered when the request is made. All oral requests must be confirmed by written application, together with all supporting evidence, within three
( 3 ) business days of the original request.
( c ) *Notice.* Except when the Department decides that no notice need be given, applicants for emergency exemption shall notify, as appropriate, those persons specified in § 302.304(b) of this subpart. Such notification shall be made in the same manner, contain the same information, and be dispatched at the same time, as the application made to the Department.