Facility _Information

facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_type

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 1943 14232 Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail Corporation Otter Tail Power Company

operator Otter Tail Power Company 215 S Cascade St, PO Box 496 Fergus Falls

MN 56538-0496 6098 14232 NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail Corporation Ottter Tail Power Company

operator Otter Tail Power Company, 215 S Cascade, P O Box 496 Fergus Falls

MN 56537 8222 14232 See Note Otter Tail Power Company operator Otter Tail Power Company, 215 S Cascade St, PO Box 496 Fergus Falls

MN 56538-0496

Page 1Facility _Information

plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip Hoot Lake Hoot Lake Plant1012 W ater Plant Rd Fergus Falls

MN 56537 Otter Tail Power Company 215 S Cascade StPO Box 496 Fergus Falls

MN 56538-0496 Big Stone Big Stone Plant48450 144th Street Big Stone City

SD 57216 Otter Tail Power Company 215 S Cascade StPO Box 496 Fergus Falls

MN 56538-0496 Coyote Coyote Statition6240 13th St SW Beulah ND 58523-0339 Otter Tail Tail Power Company 215 S Cacade StreetPO Box 496

Fergus Falls

MN 56538-0496

Page 2Facility _Information

RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas No TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE FALSE No TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE FALSE No TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE FALSE

Page 3Facility _Information

ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE TRUE The queston implies that deviations are permit violatons, which is inaccurate. Hoot Lake submits a quarterly excess emissions report and semi-annual monitoring report that identifies instances of deviations from the Title V permit conditions. No Part I Facility and Fuel Information - Fuel Information ContinuedDistillate oil burned for startup and flame stabilization only - oil represented less than 0.3% of the total heat input for each boiler in 2009.Part I - Boiler Information - Boiler 002 & Boiler 003The design heat input is the nominal heat input at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS 2008 URGE test.The operating steam pressure, steam temperature and reheat temperature represent general average conditions.Part I Unit Information - Unit Configuration ID 2 and 3Permitted emission limit - PM equals filterable plus organic. PM10 equals filterable plus condensable.Permit emission limit details - PM, PM10, and CO emission limit compliance based on the average of 3 emission test runs.Permit emission limit averaging period for NOx for both units based on an annual average.Part I - Unit Control Technology Demonstrations - Hoot Lake units 2 and 3Activated carbon injection had been planned for insta FALSE TRUE The question implies that deviations are permit violations, which is inaccrate. Otter Tail submits a quarterly report that identifies instances of deviations from permit conditions. No EPA CAMD for SO2 and NOx Part I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup only . Oil represent less than 0.04% of the total boler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler InformationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The design gross boiler efficiency in based on a design net thermal heatrate of 8200 Btu/Kwh, which was never achieved.The current improved boiler operating efficiency is due primarily

to the use of subbituminous coal instead of lignite.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification parameters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. Theyrepresent geneal average conditions.The average annual capacity factor for the past 3 years is based on GADS.Part I Boiler Information - NOx ControlsNOx controls were were installed in October 1997, but not consistently operated u FALSE TRUE The queston implies that deviations are permit violatons, which is inaccurate. Coyote submits a semi-annual monitoring report that identifies instances of deviations from the Title V permit. No EPA CAMD SO2 and NOx Part I - Legal Owner of Facility: NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Northrn Municipal Power Agency, Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail CorporationPart I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup and flame stabilization only. Oil represented less than 0.2% of the total boiler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler informationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The orginal design gross boiler efficiency is a based on the boiler specification.The present operating boiler efficiency is based on heat loss methodology.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification paramters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating steam reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. They represent gene

Page 4Facility _Information

Part I Facility

and Fuel Information - Fuel Information ContinuedDistillate oil burned for startup and flame stabilization only - oil represented less than 0.3% of the total heat input for each boiler in 2009.Part I - Boiler Information - Boiler 002 & Boiler 003The design heat input is the nominal heat input at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS 2008 URGE test.The operating steam pressure, steam temperature and reheat temperature represent general average conditions.Part I Unit Information - Unit Configuration ID 2 and 3Permitted emission limit - PM equals filterable plus organic. PM10 equals filterable plus condensable.Permit emission limit details - PM, PM10, and CO emission limit compliance based on the average of 3 emission test runs.Permit emission limit averaging period for NOx for both units based on an annual average.Part I - Unit Control Technology Demonstrations - Hoot Lake units 2 and 3Activated carbon injection had been planned for insta Part I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup only . Oil represent less than 0.04% of the total boler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler InformationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The design gross boiler efficiency in based on a design net thermal heatrate of 8200 Btu/Kwh, which was never achieved.The current improved boiler operating efficiency is due primarily

to the use of subbituminous coal instead of lignite.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification parameters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. Theyrepresent geneal average conditions.The average annual capacity factor for the past 3 years is based on GADS.Part I Boiler Information - NOx ControlsNOx controls were were installed in October 1997, but not consistently operated u Part I - Legal Owner of Facility: NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Northrn Municipal Power Agency, Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail CorporationPart I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup and flame stabilization only. Oil represented less than 0.2% of the total boiler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler informationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The orginal design gross boiler efficiency is a based on the boiler specification.The present operating boiler efficiency is based on heat loss methodology.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification paramters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating steam reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. They represent gene

Page 5Facility _Information

Part I Facility

and Fuel Information - Fuel Information ContinuedDistillate oil burned for startup and flame stabilization only - oil represented less than 0.3% of the total heat input for each boiler in 2009.Part I - Boiler Information - Boiler 002 & Boiler 003The design heat input is the nominal heat input at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS 2008 URGE test.The operating steam pressure, steam temperature and reheat temperature represent general average conditions.Part I Unit Information - Unit Configuration ID 2 and 3Permitted emission limit - PM equals filterable plus organic. PM10 equals filterable plus condensable.Permit emission limit details - PM, PM10, and CO emission limit compliance based on the average of 3 emission test runs.Permit emission limit averaging period for NOx for both units based on an annual average.Part I - Unit Control Technology Demonstrations - Hoot Lake units 2 and 3Activated carbon injection had been planned for insta Part I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup only . Oil represent less than 0.04% of the total boler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler InformationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The design gross boiler efficiency in based on a design net thermal heatrate of 8200 Btu/Kwh, which was never achieved.The current improved boiler operating efficiency is due primarily

to the use of subbituminous coal instead of lignite.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification parameters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. Theyrepresent geneal average conditions.The average annual capacity factor for the past 3 years is based on GADS.Part I Boiler Information - NOx ControlsNOx controls were were installed in October 1997, but not consistently operated u Part I - Legal Owner of Facility: NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Northrn Municipal Power Agency, Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail CorporationPart I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup and flame stabilization only. Oil represented less than 0.2% of the total boiler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler informationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The orginal design gross boiler efficiency is a based on the boiler specification.The present operating boiler efficiency is based on heat loss methodology.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification paramters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating steam reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. They represent gene

Page 6Facility _Information

Part I Facility

and Fuel Information - Fuel Information ContinuedDistillate oil burned for startup and flame stabilization only - oil represented less than 0.3% of the total heat input for each boiler in 2009.Part I - Boiler Information - Boiler 002 & Boiler 003The design heat input is the nominal heat input at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS 2008 URGE test.The operating steam pressure, steam temperature and reheat temperature represent general average conditions.Part I Unit Information - Unit Configuration ID 2 and 3Permitted emission limit - PM equals filterable plus organic. PM10 equals filterable plus condensable.Permit emission limit details - PM, PM10, and CO emission limit compliance based on the average of 3 emission test runs.Permit emission limit averaging period for NOx for both units based on an annual average.Part I - Unit Control Technology Demonstrations - Hoot Lake units 2 and 3Activated carbon injection had been planned for insta Part I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup only . Oil represent less than 0.04% of the total boler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler InformationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The design gross boiler efficiency in based on a design net thermal heatrate of 8200 Btu/Kwh, which was never achieved.The current improved boiler operating efficiency is due primarily

to the use of subbituminous coal instead of lignite.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification parameters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. Theyrepresent geneal average conditions.The average annual capacity factor for the past 3 years is based on GADS.Part I Boiler Information - NOx ControlsNOx controls were were installed in October 1997, but not consistently operated u Part I - Legal Owner of Facility: NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Northrn Municipal Power Agency, Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail CorporationPart I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup and flame stabilization only. Oil represented less than 0.2% of the total boiler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler informationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The orginal design gross boiler efficiency is a based on the boiler specification.The present operating boiler efficiency is based on heat loss methodology.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification paramters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating steam reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. They represent gene

Page 7Facility _Information

Part I Facility

and Fuel Information - Fuel Information ContinuedDistillate oil burned for startup and flame stabilization only - oil represented less than 0.3% of the total heat input for each boiler in 2009.Part I - Boiler Information - Boiler 002 & Boiler 003The design heat input is the nominal heat input at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS 2008 URGE test.The operating steam pressure, steam temperature and reheat temperature represent general average conditions.Part I Unit Information - Unit Configuration ID 2 and 3Permitted emission limit - PM equals filterable plus organic. PM10 equals filterable plus condensable.Permit emission limit details - PM, PM10, and CO emission limit compliance based on the average of 3 emission test runs.Permit emission limit averaging period for NOx for both units based on an annual average.Part I - Unit Control Technology Demonstrations - Hoot Lake units 2 and 3Activated carbon injection had been planned for insta Part I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup only . Oil represent less than 0.04% of the total boler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler InformationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The design gross boiler efficiency in based on a design net thermal heatrate of 8200 Btu/Kwh, which was never achieved.The current improved boiler operating efficiency is due primarily

to the use of subbituminous coal instead of lignite.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification parameters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. Theyrepresent geneal average conditions.The average annual capacity factor for the past 3 years is based on GADS.Part I Boiler Information - NOx ControlsNOx controls were were installed in October 1997, but not consistently operated u Part I - Legal Owner of Facility: NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Northrn Municipal Power Agency, Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail CorporationPart I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup and flame stabilization only. Oil represented less than 0.2% of the total boiler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler informationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The orginal design gross boiler efficiency is a based on the boiler specification.The present operating boiler efficiency is based on heat loss methodology.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification paramters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating steam reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. They represent gene

Page 8Facility _Information

Part I Facility

and Fuel Information - Fuel Information ContinuedDistillate oil burned for startup and flame stabilization only - oil represented less than 0.3% of the total heat input for each boiler in 2009.Part I - Boiler Information - Boiler 002 & Boiler 003The design heat input is the nominal heat input at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS 2008 URGE test.The operating steam pressure, steam temperature and reheat temperature represent general average conditions.Part I Unit Information - Unit Configuration ID 2 and 3Permitted emission limit - PM equals filterable plus organic. PM10 equals filterable plus condensable.Permit emission limit details - PM, PM10, and CO emission limit compliance based on the average of 3 emission test runs.Permit emission limit averaging period for NOx for both units based on an annual average.Part I - Unit Control Technology Demonstrations - Hoot Lake units 2 and 3Activated carbon injection had been planned for insta Part I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup only . Oil represent less than 0.04% of the total boler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler InformationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The design gross boiler efficiency in based on a design net thermal heatrate of 8200 Btu/Kwh, which was never achieved.The current improved boiler operating efficiency is due primarily

to the use of subbituminous coal instead of lignite.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification parameters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. Theyrepresent geneal average conditions.The average annual capacity factor for the past 3 years is based on GADS.Part I Boiler Information - NOx ControlsNOx controls were were installed in October 1997, but not consistently operated u Part I - Legal Owner of Facility: NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Northrn Municipal Power Agency, Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail CorporationPart I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup and flame stabilization only. Oil represented less than 0.2% of the total boiler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler informationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The orginal design gross boiler efficiency is a based on the boiler specification.The present operating boiler efficiency is based on heat loss methodology.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification paramters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating steam reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. They represent gene

Page 9Facility _Information

Part I Facility

and Fuel Information - Fuel Information ContinuedDistillate oil burned for startup and flame stabilization only - oil represented less than 0.3% of the total heat input for each boiler in 2009.Part I - Boiler Information - Boiler 002 & Boiler 003The design heat input is the nominal heat input at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS 2008 URGE test.The operating steam pressure, steam temperature and reheat temperature represent general average conditions.Part I Unit Information - Unit Configuration ID 2 and 3Permitted emission limit - PM equals filterable plus organic. PM10 equals filterable plus condensable.Permit emission limit details - PM, PM10, and CO emission limit compliance based on the average of 3 emission test runs.Permit emission limit averaging period for NOx for both units based on an annual average.Part I - Unit Control Technology Demonstrations - Hoot Lake units 2 and 3Activated carbon injection had been planned for insta Part I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup only. Oil represent less than 0.04% of the total boler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler InformationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The design gross boiler efficiency in based on a design net thermal heatrate of 8200 Btu/Kwh, which was never achieved.The current improved boiler operating efficiency is due primarily

to the use of subbituminous coal instead of lignite.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification parameters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. Theyrepresent geneal average conditions.The average annual capacity factor for the past 3 years is based on GADS.Part I Boiler Information - NOx ControlsNOx controls were were installed in October 1997, but not consistently operated u Part I - Legal Owner of Facility: NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Northrn Municipal Power Agency, Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail CorporationPart I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup and flame stabilization only. Oil represented less than 0.2% of the total boiler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler informationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The orginal design gross boiler efficiency is a based on the boiler specification.The present operating boiler efficiency is based on heat loss methodology.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification paramters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating steam reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. They represent gene

Page 10Facility _Information

Part I Facility

and Fuel Information - Fuel Information ContinuedDistillate oil burned for startup and flame stabilization only - oil represented less than 0.3% of the total heat input for each boiler in 2009.Part I - Boiler Information - Boiler 002 & Boiler 003The design heat input is the nominal heat input at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS 2008 URGE test.The operating steam pressure, steam temperature and reheat temperature represent general average conditions.Part I Unit Information - Unit Configuration ID 2 and 3Permitted emission limit - PM equals filterable plus organic. PM10 equals filterable plus condensable.Permit emission limit details - PM, PM10, and CO emission limit compliance based on the average of 3 emission test runs.Permit emission limit averaging period for NOx for both units based on an annual average.Part I - Unit Control Technology Demonstrations - Hoot Lake units 2 and 3Activated carbon injection had been planned for insta Part I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup only. Oil represent less than 0.04% of the total boler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler InformationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The design gross boiler efficiency in based on a design net thermal heatrate of 8200 Btu/Kwh, which was never achieved.The current improved boiler operating efficiency is due primarily

to the use of subbituminous coal instead of lignite.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification parameters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. Theyrepresent geneal average conditions.The average annual capacity factor for the past 3 years is based on GADS.Part I Boiler Information - NOx ControlsNOx controls were were installed in October 1997, but not consistently operated u Part I - Legal Owner of Facility: NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Northrn Municipal Power Agency, Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail CorporationPart I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup and flame stabilization only. Oil represented less than 0.2% of the total boiler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler informationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The orginal design gross boiler efficiency is a based on the boiler specification.The present operating boiler efficiency is based on heat loss methodology.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification paramters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating steam reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. They represent gene

Page 11Facility _Information

Part I Facility

and Fuel Information - Fuel Information ContinuedDistillate oil burned for startup and flame stabilization only - oil represented less than 0.3% of the total heat input for each boiler in 2009.Part I - Boiler Information - Boiler 002 & Boiler 003The design heat input is the nominal heat input at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS 2008 URGE test.The operating steam pressure, steam temperature and reheat temperature represent general average conditions.Part I Unit Information - Unit Configuration ID 2 and 3Permitted emission limit - PM equals filterable plus organic. PM10 equals filterable plus condensable.Permit emission limit details - PM, PM10, and CO emission limit compliance based on the average of 3 emission test runs.Permit emission limit averaging period for NOx for both units based on an annual average.Part I - Unit Control Technology Demonstrations - Hoot Lake units 2 and 3Activated carbon injection had been planned for insta Part I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup only. Oil represent less than 0.04% of the total boler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler InformationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The design gross boiler efficiency in based on a design net thermal heatrate of 8200 Btu/Kwh, which was never achieved.The current improved boiler operating efficiency is due primarily

to the use of subbituminous coal instead of lignite.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification parameters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. Theyrepresent geneal average conditions.The average annual capacity factor for the past 3 years is based on GADS.Part I Boiler Information - NOx ControlsNOx controls were were installed in October 1997, but not consistently operated u Part I - Legal Owner of Facility: NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Northrn Municipal Power Agency, Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail CorporationPart I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup and flame stabilization only. Oil represented less than 0.2% of the total boiler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler informationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The orginal design gross boiler efficiency is a based on the boiler specification.The present operating boiler efficiency is based on heat loss methodology.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification paramters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating steam reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. They represent gene

Page 12Facility _Information

Part I Facility

and Fuel Information - Fuel Information ContinuedDistillate oil burned for startup and flame stabilization only - oil represented less than 0.3% of the total heat input for each boiler in 2009.Part I - Boiler Information - Boiler 002 & Boiler 003The design heat input is the nominal heat input at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS 2008 URGE test.The operating steam pressure, steam temperature and reheat temperature represent general average conditions.Part I Unit Information - Unit Configuration ID 2 and 3Permitted emission limit - PM equals filterable plus organic. PM10 equals filterable plus condensable.Permit emission limit details - PM, PM10, and CO emission limit compliance based on the average of 3 emission test runs.Permit emission limit averaging period for NOx for both units based on an annual average.Part I - Unit Control Technology Demonstrations - Hoot Lake units 2 and 3Activated carbon injection had been planned for insta Part I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup only. Oil represent less than 0.04% of the total boler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler InformationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The design gross boiler efficiency in based on a design net thermal heatrate of 8200 Btu/Kwh, which was never achieved.The current improved boiler operating efficiency is due primarily

to the use of subbituminous coal instead of lignite.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification parameters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. Theyrepresent geneal average conditions.The average annual capacity factor for the past 3 years is based on GADS.Part I Boiler Information - NOx ControlsNOx controls were were installed in October 1997, but not consistently operated u Part I - Legal Owner of Facility: NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Northrn Municipal Power Agency, Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail CorporationPart I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup and flame stabilization only. Oil represented less than 0.2% of the total boiler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler informationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The orginal design gross boiler efficiency is a based on the boiler specification.The present operating boiler efficiency is based on heat loss methodology.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification paramters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating steam reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. They represent gene

Page 13Facility _Information

Part I Facility

and Fuel Information - Fuel Information ContinuedDistillate oil burned for startup and flame stabilization only - oil represented less than 0.3% of the total heat input for each boiler in 2009.Part I - Boiler Information - Boiler 002 & Boiler 003The design heat input is the nominal heat input at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS 2008 URGE test.The operating steam pressure, steam temperature and reheat temperature represent general average conditions.Part I Unit Information - Unit Configuration ID 2 and 3Permitted emission limit - PM equals filterable plus organic. PM10 equals filterable plus condensable.Permit emission limit details - PM, PM10, and CO emission limit compliance based on the average of 3 emission test runs.Permit emission limit averaging period for NOx for both units based on an annual average.Part I - Unit Control Technology Demonstrations - Hoot Lake units 2 and 3Activated carbon injection had been planned for insta Part I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup only . Oil represent less than 0.04% of the total boler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler InformationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The design gross boiler efficiency in based on a design net thermal heatrate of 8200 Btu/Kwh, which was never achieved.The current improved boiler operating efficiency is due primarily

to the use of subbituminous coal instead of lignite.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification parameters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. Theyrepresent geneal average conditions.The average annual capacity factor for the past 3 years is based on GADS.Part I Boiler Information - NOx ControlsNOx controls were were installed in October 1997, but not consistently operated u Part I - Legal Owner of Facility: NorthW estern Corporation d/b/a NorthW estern Energy, Northrn Municipal Power Agency, Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group Inc., and Otter Tail Power Company a wholly owned subsidiary

of Otter Tail CorporationPart I Oil Type - Distallate oil for startup and flame stabilization only. Oil represented less than 0.2% of the total boiler heat input for 2009.Part I - Boiler informationThe design heat input is a nominal value at design conditions.The present maximum heat input is based on CEMS data during the 2008 URGE test.The orginal design gross boiler efficiency is a based on the boiler specification.The present operating boiler efficiency is based on heat loss methodology.The design steam pressure, design steam temperature and design reheat temperature are boiler specification paramters.The operating steam pressure, operating steam temperature and operating steam reheat temperature are at the turbine throttle. They represent gene

Page 14facility _contacts

facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 1943 5 Mgr Environmental Services Terry Graumann 2187398407 tgraumann@otpco.com TRUE 1943 6 Senior Compliance Specialist Mark Thoma

2187398526 mthoma@otpco.com FALSE 6098 3 Mgr. Environmental Services Terry Graumann 2187398406 tgraumann@otpco.com TRUE 6098 4 Senior Compliance Specialist Mark Thoma

2187398526 mthoma@otpco.com FALSE 8222 1 Mgr. Environmental Services Terry Graumann 2187398407 tgraumann@optco.com TRUE 8222 2 Senior Compliance Specialist Mark Thoma

2187398526 mthoma@otpco.com FALSE

Page 15facility _coal_utilized

facility _id coal_type percentage_mass percentage_btu

synfuel_type

coal_note 1943 subbituminous 100 100 6098 subbituminous 100 100 8222 lignite 100 100

Page 16facility _oil_utilized

facility _id oil_type percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_type 1943 No.2 Fuel Oil (distillate) 97.2 97.2 1943 other (specify) 2.8 2.8 used oil 6098 No.2 Fuel Oil (distillate) 96 96 6098 other (specify) 4 4 Used oil and solvent mixture 8222 No.2 Fuel Oil (distillate) 99 99 8222 other (specify) 1 1 Used oil/solvent misture

Page 17facility _other_materials

facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain 1943 non-harzardous oil spill cleanup materials

TRUE TRUE 0 num ber/year This material includes used floor dry and rags which are burned in unknown quantities. It is our understanding that the material is currently classified as a solid waste whose use is allowed for this purpose. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 1943 non-hazardous boiler cleaning agents

TRUE TRUE 0 num ber/year None burned in 2009 Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 Agricultural crop residue and waste seeds

TRUE TRUE 4359 tons/year Big Stone m ade a business decision to discontinue using this fuel beginning in calendar year 2010. Unknown - ultimately, future use of this material as fuel would depend on the final requirements. 6098 Boiler steam-side cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 0 num ber/year Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 Chipped treated wood with copper arsenate and pentachlorophenol

TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 Evaporative brine concentrator supernatant

TRUE FALSE 0 num ber/year Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 Floor dry, diatom aceous earth, dirt, sorbent debris containing non-PCB oil

TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 Gasket and O rings

TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 Granulated insulation

TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 Manufactured wood waste containing formaldehyde resins and materials

TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 On-site generated used oil filters

TRUE TRUE 1 num ber/year Unkown quantity Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 Plastic chips TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 Refuse derived fuel

TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 Rubber belting

TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 6098 Tire derived fuel

TRUE TRUE 11245 tons/year Big Stone m ade a business decision to discontinue using this fuel beginning in calendar yer 2010. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the final requirements if this material would be used as a fuel in the future. 6098 Trees and natural wood

TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Unknown - ultimately, it will depend on the final requirem ents. 6098 Tube forms TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Unknown - ultimately, it will depend on the final requirem ents 6098 Used oil and solvents (on-site generated)

TRUE TRUE 3120 num ber/year Gallons per year of used oil/solvent misture It is our understndanding that the material is currentty classified as a solid waste whose use is allowed for this purpose. Unknown - ultimately, it will depend on the fnal requirements if this fuel would be used in the future. 6098 Wa ste Toner Powder

TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Unknown - ultimately, it will depend on the final requirem ents. 8222 hazardous waste

TRUE TRUE 2699 num ber/year gallons per year of on-site generated used oil/solvent mixture It is our understanding that the material is currently classified as a solid waste whose use is allowed for this purpose. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. 8222 Soil, rock, and other earthen debris contaminated with oil containing less than 50 ppm PCB

TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year Material not currently used as fuel, but ultimately it would depend on the requirem ents 8222 Used oil containing less than 50 ppm PCB

TRUE FALSE 0 num ber/year Material not currently used as a fuel. Unknown - ultimately it would depend on the requirem ents.

Page 18facility _other_materials

rcra_explain It is our understanding that the material is currently classified as a solid waste whose use is allowed for this purpose. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Big Stone m ade a business decision to discontinue using this fuel beginning in calendar year 2010. Unknown - ultimately, future use of this material as fuel would depend on the final requirements. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Big Stone m ade a business decision to discontinue using this fuel beginning in calendar yer 2010. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the final requirements if this material would be used as a fuel in the future. Unknown - ultimately, it will depend on the final requirem ents. Unknown - ultimately, it will depend on the final requirem ents It is our understndanding that the material is currentty classified as a solid waste whose use is allowed for this purpose. Unknown - ultimately, it will depend on the fnal requirements if this fuel would be used in the future. Unknown - ultimately, it will depend on the final requirem ents. It is our understanding that the material is currently classified as a solid waste whose use is allowed for this purpose. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents. Material not currently

used as fuel, but ultimately it would depend on the requirem ents Material not currently

used as a fuel. Unknown - ultimately it would depend on the requirem ents.

Page 19facility _other_materials

It is our understanding that the material is currently classified as a solid waste whose use is allowed for this purpose. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents.

Big Stone m ade a business decision to discontinue using this fuel beginning in calendar year 2010. Unknown - ultimately, future use of this material as fuel would depend on the final requirements.

Big Stone m ade a business decision to discontinue using this fuel beginning in calendar yer 2010. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the final requirements if this material would be used as a fuel in the future.

It is our understndanding that the material is currentty classified as a solid waste whose use is allowed for this purpose. Unknown - ultimately, it will depend on the fnal requirements if this fuel would be used in the future.

It is our understanding that the material is currently classified as a solid waste whose use is allowed for this purpose. Unknown - ultimately, it would depend on the requirem ents.

Page 20facility _other_materials

It is our understndanding that the material is currentty classified as a solid waste whose use is allowed for this purpose. Unknown - ultimately, it will depend on the fnal requirements if this fuel would be used in the future.

Page 21boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_type boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuel heat_input max_heat_input MW e_capacity 1943 002 Tangential firing Dry Bottom coal 590 747.2 60.7 1943 003 Wa ll firing - front firing Dry Bottom coal 940 978.7 83.5 6098 001 Cyclone firing Wet Bottom coal 4560 5309 495 8222 B1 Cyclone firing Wet Bottom coal 4446 5214 448

Page 22boiler_information

MW e_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 58 82.83 83.75 1450 1450 1000 1000 FALSE 1000 80 83.28 85.86 1250 1250 950 950 FALSE 475 81.6 84.5 2620 2400 1005 990 FALSE 1005 427 83.58 83.11 2620 2358 1005 997 FALSE 1005

Page 23boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 1000 7184 75.21 N FALSE FALSE 7435 79.33 FALSE FALSE 1000 7873 73.5 N FALSE FALSE 987 7490.9 76.06 Subpart D FALSE

Page 24boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No

Page 25boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_type fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1943 002 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.99 99.98 1943 002 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.95 99.89 1943 002 coal - subbituminous 2009 99.99 99.97 1943 002 oil - distillate 2007 0.01 0.02 1943 002 oil - distillate 2008 0.05 0.1 1943 002 oil - distillate 2009 0.01 0.02 1943 002 other fossil fuel (specify) 2007 0 0 used oil 1943 002 other fossil fuel (specify) 2008 0 0.01 used oil 1943 002 other fossil fuel (specify) 2009 0 0.01 used oil 1943 003 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.96 99.93 1943 003 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.94 99.88 1943 003 coal - subbituminous 2009 99.86 99.74 1943 003 oil - distillate 2007 0.04 0.07 1943 003 oil - distillate 2008 0.06 0.12 1943 003 oil - distillate 2009 0.14 0.26 6098 001 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.27 98.93 6098 001 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.46 99.16 6098 001 coal - subbituminous 2009 99.2 98.86 6098 001 oil - distillate 2007 0.03 0.06 6098 001 oil - distillate 2008 0.01 0.03 6098 001 oil - distillate 2009 0.01 0.03 6098 001 oil - other 2007 0 0 used oil and solvents 6098 001 oil - other 2008 0 0 used oil and solvents 6098 001 oil - other 2009 0 0 used oil and solvents 6098 001 other non-fossil fuel (specify) 2007 0.7 1.01 tire-derived fuel and waste agricultual seeds 6098 001 other non-fossil fuel (specify) 2008 0.53 0.81 tire-derived fuel and waste agricultural seeds 6098 001 other non-fossil fuel (specify) 2009 0.79 1.11 tire-derived fuel and waste agricultural seeds 8222 B1 coal - lignite 2007 99.91 99.76 8222 B1 coal - lignite 2008 99.96 99.89 8222 B1 coal - lignite 2009 99.94 99.84 8222 B1 oil - distillate 2007 0.09 0.24 8222 B1 oil - distillate 2008 0.04 0.11 8222 B1 oil - distillate 2009 0.06 0.16 8222 B1 oil - other 2007 0 0 On-site generated used oil and solvents 8222 B1 oil - other 2008 0 0 On-site generated used oil and solvents 8222 B1 oil - other 2009 0 0 On-site generated used oil and solvents

Page 26boiler_fuels

tire-derived fuel and waste agricultual seeds tire-derived fuel and waste agricultural seeds tire-derived fuel and waste agricultural seeds

On-site generated used oil and solvents On-site generated used oil and solvents On-site generated used oil and solvents

Page 27boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_type NOx_other NOx_online 1943 002 Low NOx Burner 6/1/2008 1943 002 Overfire Air 6/1/2008 1943 003 Low NOx Burner 10/1/2006 1943 003 Overfire Air 10/1/2006 6098 001 Overfire Air 1/1/2000

Page 28boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_type SO2_other SO2_online 1943 002 Low Sulfur Coal 11/1/1988 1943 002 Low Sulfur Fuel Oil 6/1/2006 1943 003 Low Sulfur Coal 9/1/1988 1943 003 Low Sulfur Fuel Oil 6/1/2006 6098 001 Low Sulfur Coal 8/1/1995 6098 001 Low Sulfur Fuel Oil 11/1/2005 8222 B1 Low Sulfur Fuel Oil 5/1/2001

Page 29boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online

Page 30facility _units

facility _id unit_id 1943 2 1943 3 6098 001 8222 001

Page 31unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 1943 2 002 1943 3 003 6098 001 001 8222 001 B1

Page 32facility _controls

facility _id control_id control_group control_type

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 1943 ESP2 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 6/1/1972 1943 ESP3 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 5/1/1972 6098 FF1 PM control Fabric Filter, pulse FALSE 12/1/2007 8222 FF1 PM control Fabric Filter, shake and deflate FALSE 5/1/1981 8222 SD1 SO2 control Spray dryer type FALSE 5/1/1981

Page 33facility _controls

reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

Lim e and alkaline fly

ash No

Page 34facility _sampling_ports

facility _id sampling_port_id 1943 ESP2 Inlet 1943 ESP2Out 1943 ESP3Inlet 1943 ESP3Out 6098 FF Inlet 6098 Stack Ports 8222 Sprayer Inlet Ports 8222 StackPorts

Page 35facility _stacks

facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 1943 Common Stack 225 13.4 6098 Stack 498 24.17 75 8222 Stack1 498 21 90

Page 36configurations

facility _id configuration_id 1943 2 1943 3 6098 001 8222 001

Page 37configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_type port_near 1943 2 2 1 Unit 1943 2 Common Stack 5 Stack 1943 2 ESP2 3 PM control 1943 2 ESP2 Inlet 2 Sam pling Port next 1943 2 ESP2Out 4 Sam pling Port pevious 1943 3 3 1 Unit 1943 3 Common Stack 5 Stack 1943 3 ESP3 3 PM control 1943 3 ESP3Inlet 2 Sam pling Port next 1943 3 ESP3Out 4 Sam pling Port pevious 6098 001 001 1 Unit 6098 001 FF Inlet 2 Sam pling Port next 6098 001 FF1 3 PM control 6098 001 Stack 4 Stack 6098 001 Stack Ports 5 Sam pling Port pevious 8222 001 001 1 Unit 8222 001 FF1 4 PM control 8222 001 SD1 3 SO2 control 8222 001 Sprayer Inlet Ports 2 Sam pling Port next 8222 001 Stack1 5 Stack 8222 001 StackPorts 6 Sam pling Port pevious

Page 38configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_type_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 8222 001 PM (Filterable) Fderal - Title V Operating Permit

0.1 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

1 hour 445 pound per hour (lb/hr) 8222 001 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

1.2 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

3 hours 5335 pound per hour (lb/hr) 8222 001 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

3910 pound per hour (lb/hr)

30 days 0.86 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 6098 001 PM (Filterable) Fderal - Title V Operating Permit

0.3 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

1 hour 6098 001 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

3 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

3 hours 6098 001 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

0.86 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 1943 2 PM (Filterable) Fderal - Title V Operating Permit

0.6 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

1 hour 1943 2 PM10 (Filterable) Fedral - Title V Operating Permit

0.47 pound per hour (lb/hr)

1 hour 1943 2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

3 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

1 hour 1770 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1943 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

0.231 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

1 hour 1943 2 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

0.4 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 1943 3 PM (Filterable) Fderal - Title V Operating Permit

0.6 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

1 hour 1943 3 PM10 (Filterable) Fedral - Title V Operating Permit

0.47 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

1 hour 1943 3 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

3 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

1 hour 1770 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1943 3 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

0.45 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 1943 3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

0.1 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

1 hour

Page 39configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_details

test_method

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping 1 hour PM lb/m mBtu lim it does not apply during startup, shutdown or malfunction Method 5 0.1 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) No Unknown if other guarantee level sought or offered PM test within one year of permit expiration, and DP measurement across the fabric filter and fabric filter inlet temperature with alarm as per CAM Plan

Test reports, calibraton of DP gauge and temperature transmitters, and fabric filter routine insptection and maintenance records. Records retention - 5 years 3 hours Both averages 3-hour rolling - lb/mmBtu limit does not apply during startup, shutdown or malfunction 1.2 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

No Unknown if other guarantee level sought or offered CEMS as per 40 CFR Part 60 and Part 75

CEMS data, RATA test result, QAQC Plans and other records as per Part 60 and part 75. Records retention - 5 years. 30 days NOx lb/hr ave. 12-month rolling, lb/mmBtu annual average No CEMS as per 40 CFR Part 60 and Part 75 CEMS data, RATA test results, QAQC Plans, and other records as per Part 60 and Part 75. Records retention - 5 years. PM filterable limit is the average of three test runs.

Method 5 0.012 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) No Design PM filterable emission rate for the 2007 fabric filter replacement. Initial test within 180 day of permit issuance - second test within 540 to 720 days of the initial test, opacity emissions and scheduled euipment maintenance. Test reports, COMS readings and equipment maintenance records. Records retention a period of 5 years. SO2 emission rate is a three hour rolling average limit. No There are no guaranteed emission rates. CEMS consistent with Part Part 75 requirements.

CEMS data RATA Test reports, QAQC plans along with other records as per Part 75 requirements. Records retention - 5 years. NOx emission limit is an annual average limit. No There are no guaranteed emission rates. CEMS consistent with Part Part 75 requirements.

CEMS data RATA Test reports, QAQC plans along with other records as per Part 75 requirements. Records retention - 5 years. Method 5 No Em issions test as specified in Title V permit. opacity emissions, scheduled equipment maintenance, ESP power readings Test reports, COMS readings, equipment maintenance records, ESP power readings. Records retention for a period of 5 years. Method 5 plus Method 202 No Em issions test as specified in Title V permit. opacity emissions, scheduled equipment maintenance, ESP power readings Test reports, COMS readings, equipment maintenance records, ESP power readings. Records retention for a period of 5 years. 1 hour No CEMS consistent with Part 75 requirements CEMS data, RATA test reports, QAQC plans along with other records as per Part 75 requirements. Records retention for a period of 5 years. No A lim it of 175 ppm is guaranteed contingent on specific performance conditions. Em issions test as specified in Title V permit, maintain minimum boiler excess O2 as specified in Title V permit.

Test reports, boiler excess O2 records. Records retention for a period of 5 years. 0.15 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

No Contingent on specific performance specifications. CEMS consistent with Part 75 requirements

CEMS data, RATA test reports, QAQC plans along with other records as per Part 75 requirements. Records retention for a period of 5 years. Method 5 No Em issions test as specified in Title V permit. opacity emissions, scheduled equipment maintenance, ESP power readings Test reports, COMS readings, equipment maintenance records, ESP power readings. Records retention for a period of 5 years. Method 5 and Method 202 No Em issions test as specified in Title V permit. opacity emissions, scheduled equipment maintenance, ESP power readings Test reports, COMS readings, equipment maintenance records, ESP power readings. Records retention for a period of 5 years. 1 hour No CEMS consistent with Part 75 requirements CEMS data, RATA test reports, QAQC plans along with other records as per Part 75 requirements. Records retention for a period of 5 years. No CEMS consistent with Part 75 requirements CEMS data, RATA test reports, QAQC plans along with other records as per Part 75 requirements. Records retention for a period of 5 years. No Em issions test as specified in Title V permit, maintain minimum boiler excess O2 as specified in Title V permit. Test reports, boiler excess O2 records. Records retention for a period of 5 years.

Page 40configuration_pollutants1

req_reporting Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emission inventory report quarterly excess emissions reporting, semi-annual monitoring report, annual complinance certification, and annual emissions inventory quarterly excess emissions reporting, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification and annual emission inventory report Test Reports and deviations reporting from the CAM Plan requirements, quarterly excess emissions reports, annual compliance certification reports and annual emissions inventory

. Quarterly

excess emissions reports, annual compliance certification and annual emissions inventory

. Annual compliance certification and annual emissions inventory

. Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

. Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

. Quarterly

excess emisions report, semi-annual monitoring report, annual emissions inventory

. Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

. Quarterly

excess emisions report, semi-annual monitoring report, annual emissions inventory

. Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

. Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

. Quarterly

excess emisions report, semi-annual monitoring report, annual emissions inventory

. Quarterly

excess emisions report, semi-annual monitoring report, annual emissions inventory

. Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

.

Page 41configuration_pollutants1

Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emission inventory report quarterly excess emissions reporting, semi-annual monitoring report, annual complinance certification, and annual emissions inventory quarterly excess emissions reporting, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification and annual emission inventory report Test Reports and deviations reporting from the CAM Plan requirements, quarterly excess emissions reports, annual compliance certification reports and annual emissions inventory

.

Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

. Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

. Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

. Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

. Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

.

Test reports, semi-annual monitoring report, annual compliance certification, and annual emissions inventory

.

Page 42control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_titleproject_type vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone 1943 2 ESP2 2 Hoot Lake Plant Unit 2 and 3 Mercury Em issions Control Project Non-Demonstration

ADA-ES Mr. Bob W ewer 3039621938 1943 3 ESP3 3 Hoot Lake Unit 2 and 3 Mercury Em issions Control Project Non-Demonstration

ADA-ES Mr. Bob W ewer 3039621938

Page 43control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive ADA-ES, Inc.8100 SouthPark W ay Unit B Littleton CO 80120 Activated carbon ADA-ES, Inc.8100 SouthPark W ay Unit B Littleton CO 80120 Activated Carbon

Page 44control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units upsteam of the Unit 2 ESP

70 2.5 2.9 lbs/mmacf Upstream of the unit 3 ESP

70 2.5 2.9 lbs/mmacf

Page 45control_technologies

feed_rate_units

Page 46control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_type 1943 2 ESP2 2 subbituminous 1943 3 ESP3 3 subbituminous

Page 47control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e 1943 2 ESP2 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 1943 3 ESP3 3 Total Mercury (Hgt)

Page 48control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year 1943 2 ESP2 2 Yes 1943 3 ESP3 3 Yes

Page 49control_costs

CBI FALSE FALSE

Page 50mi sc_controls

facility _id mi sc_control_id

control_description

Page 51mi sc_control_configurations

facility _id mi sc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 52fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_type state_country other_country

county 1943 001 1/1/2009 42027 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 002 2/1/2009 29994 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 003 3/1/2009 30946 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 004 4/1/2009 28098 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 005 5/1/2009 21201 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 006 6/1/2009 20467 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 007 7/1/2009 20962 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 008 8/1/2009 20742 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 009 9/1/2009 10293 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 010 10/1/2009 10194 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 011 11/1/2009 20181 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 012 12/1/2009 9617 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Big Horn 1943 oil1 5/1/2009 185.7 barrels oil 1943 oil2 6/1/2009 366.6 barrels oil 1943 oil3 7/1/2009 366.7 barrels oil 1943 oil4 8/1/2009 178.6 barrels oil 1943 oil5 9/1/2009 185.7 barrels oil 1943 oil6 12/1/2009 359.5 barrels oil 6098 001 1/1/2009 171676 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 002 2/1/2009 148276 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 003 3/1/2009 121050 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 004 4/1/2009 125966 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 005 5/1/2009 79037 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 006 6/1/2009 88570 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 007 7/1/2009 108601 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 008 8/1/2009 118828 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 009 9/1/2009 89066 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 010 10/1/2009 118851 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 011 11/1/2009 128804 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 012 12/1/2009 132528 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6098 Oil1 5/1/2009 2296.8 barrels oil 8222 001 1/1/2009 101399.8 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Mercer 8222 002 1/1/2009 50775.3 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Oliver 8222 003 2/1/2009 55903.4 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Oliver 8222 004 2/1/2009 85468.3 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Mercer 8222 005 3/1/2009 61305.7 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Oliver 8222 006 3/1/2009 41142.9 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Mercer 8222 007 5/1/2009 47232.1 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Oliver 8222 008 5/1/2009 27218.9 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Mercer 8222 009 6/1/2009 66173.6 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Oliver 8222 010 6/1/2009 47491.6 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Mercer 8222 011 7/1/2009 40083.5 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Oliver 8222 012 7/1/2009 33705.8 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Mercer 8222 013 8/1/2009 29079.6 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Oliver 8222 014 8/1/2009 77246.6 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Mercer 8222 015 9/1/2009 23536 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Oliver 8222 016 9/1/2009 101210 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Mercer 8222 017 10/1/2009 135430.6 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Mercer 8222 018 11/1/2009 7767.6 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Oliver 8222 019 11/1/2009 137515.3 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Mercer 8222 020 12/1/2009 139790.9 short tons (2000 lbs) coal ND ND - Mercer

Page 53fuel_shipments

8222 Oil1 1/1/2009 428.6 barrels oil 8222 Oil10 10/1/2009 433.3 barrels oil 8222 Oil11 11/1/2009 426.2 barrels oil 8222 Oil12 12/1/2009 1240.5 barrels oil 8222 Oil2 2/1/2009 2783.1 barrels oil 8222 Oil3 3/1/2009 1347.8 barrels oil 8222 Oil4 4/1/2009 1095.5 barrels oil 8222 Oil5 5/1/2009 1606.1 barrels oil 8222 Oil6 6/1/2009 381 barrels oil 8222 Oil7 7/1/2009 869.1 barrels oil 8222 Oil8 8/1/2009 390.5 barrels oil 8222 Oil9 9/1/2009 428.5 barrels oil

Page 54fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train Anderson-Dietz

Unit Train

Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak, Roland and Smith

Unit Train Roland, Sm ith, and W yodak

Unit Train Wyodak, Roland, and Smith

Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train

Trucks Schoolhouse and Beulah-Zap

Conveyor Schoolhouse, Beulah-Zap, 3rd Seam

Conveyor Schoolhouse, Beulah-Zap

Conveyor Schoolhouse, Beulah-Zap

Conveyor Schoolhouse, Beulah-Zap, 3rd Seam

Conveyor Beulah-Zap Schoolhouse, Beulah-Zap, 3rd Seam

Conveyor Beulah-ZapConveyor Schoolhouse, Beulah-Zap

Conveyor Schoolhouse, Beulah-Zap

Conveyor Schoolhouse, Beulah-Zap, 3rd Seam

Conveyor Beulah-ZapConveyor Schoolhouse, Beulah-Zap, 3rd Seam

Conveyor Beulah-ZapConveyor Beulah-ZapConveyor Beulah-ZapConveyor Beulah-ZapConveyor Beulah-ZapConveyor Beulah-ZapConveyor Schoolhouse, Beulah-Zap

Conveyor

Page 55fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 1943 001 2 1943 001 3 1943 002 2 1943 002 3 1943 003 2 1943 003 3 1943 004 2 1943 004 3 1943 005 2 1943 005 3 1943 006 2 1943 006 3 1943 007 2 1943 007 3 1943 008 2 1943 008 3 1943 009 2 1943 009 3 1943 010 2 1943 010 3 1943 011 2 1943 011 3 1943 012 2 1943 012 3 1943 oil1 2 1943 oil1 3 1943 oil2 2 1943 oil2 3 1943 oil3 2 1943 oil3 3 1943 oil4 2 1943 oil4 3 1943 oil5 2 1943 oil5 3 1943 oil6 2 1943 oil6 3 6098 001 001 6098 002 001 6098 003 001 6098 004 001 6098 005 001 6098 006 001 6098 007 001 6098 008 001 6098 009 001 6098 010 001 6098 011 001 6098 012 001 6098 Oil1 001 8222 001 001 8222 002 001

Page 56fuel_shipment_configurations

8222 003 001 8222 004 001 8222 005 001 8222 006 001 8222 007 001 8222 008 001 8222 009 001 8222 010 001 8222 011 001 8222 012 001 8222 013 001 8222 014 001 8222 015 001 8222 016 001 8222 017 001 8222 018 001 8222 019 001 8222 020 001 8222 Oil1 001 8222 Oil10 001 8222 Oil11 001 8222 Oil12 001 8222 Oil2 001 8222 Oil3 001 8222 Oil4 001 8222 Oil5 001 8222 Oil6 001 8222 Oil7 001 8222 Oil8 001 8222 Oil9 001

Page 57fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units 1943 001 1/11/09 10582 tons 0.39 7.33 12123 Btu/lb 1943 002 2/07/09 10444 tons 0.3 4.52 12582 Btu/lb 1943 003 3/03/09 10211 tons 0.37 7.3 12202 Btu/lb 1943 004 4/09/09 10200 tons 0.53 6.48 12323 Btu/lb 1943 005 5/03/09 10114 tons 0.53 6.19 12400 Btu/lb 1943 006 6/25/09 10539 tons 0.36 4.67 12544 Btu/lb 1943 008 8/03/09 10668 tons 0.39 5.69 12214 Btu/lb 1943 009 9/08/09 10710 tons 0.36 5.17 12476 Btu/lb 1943 010 10/20/09 10020 tons 0.41 6.42 12282 Btu/lb 1943 011 11/01/09 10121 tons 0.4 5.78 12493 Btu/lb 1943 012 12/01/09 9952 tons 0.44 5.55 12455 Btu/lb 6098 001 1/15/09 4674 tons 0.34 8.9 11608 Btu/lb 6098 002 2/1/2009 3841 tons 0.45 7.67 11962 Btu/lb 6098 003 3/1/2009 4954 tons 0.49 7.58 12011 Btu/lb 6098 004 4/01/09 4156 tons 0.41 7.26 12033 Btu/lb 6098 005 5/01/09 3680 tons 0.48 7.89 11803 Btu/lb 6098 006 5/09/09 3554 tons 0.33 7.1 11952 Btu/lb 6098 007 7/01/09 3223 tons 0.44 7.22 11820 Btu/lb 6098 008 8/01/09 3620 tons 0.38 8 11771 Btu/lb 6098 009 8/31/09 3449 tons 0.47 8.53 11938 Btu/lb 6098 010 10/01/09 3522 tons 0.4 6.66 11926 Btu/lb 6098 011 11/01/09 4193 tons 0.49 8.7 11829 Btu/lb 6098 012 12/01/09 3731 tons 0.43 7.09 12067 Btu/lb 8222 001 1/07/09 4968 tons 1.31 12.85 10868 Btu/lb 8222 003 2/10/09 4758 tons 1.69 16.65 10574 Btu/lb 8222 005 3/04/09 5040 tons 1.04 14.84 10548 Btu/lb 8222 007 5/21/09 3141 tons 1.18 11.86 10837 Btu/lb 8222 009 6/10/09 4744 tons 1.11 13.79 10554 Btu/lb 8222 011 7/29/09 4702 tons 1.07 10.46 10900 Btu/lb 8222 013 8/10/09 4018 tons 0.99 12.32 10777 Btu/lb 8222 015 9/15/09 2670 tons 1.31 11.52 10850 Btu/lb 8222 017 10/12/09 4506 tons 1.25 11 10803 Btu/lb 8222 018 11/09/09 5015 tons 1.1 12.22 10846 Btu/lb 8222 020 12/11/09 5045 tons 1.01 10.9 11005 Btu/lb

Page 58fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_type

supplier_name

supplier_address standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other

Page 59fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies SGS North America Inc.

4665 Paris St, Suite B-200

Denver CO 80239 Yes SGS North America, Inc.

4665 Paris St, Suite B-200

Denver CO 80239 Yes SGS North America, Inc.

4665 Paris St, Suite B-200

Denver CO 80239 Yes SGS North America Inc.

4665 Paris St, Suite B-200

Denver CO 80239 Yes SGS North America Inc.

4665 Paris St, Suite B-200

Denver CO 80239 Yes SGS North America Inc.

4665 Paris St, Suite B-200

Denver CO 80239 Yes SGS North America Inc.

4665 Paris St, Suite B-200

Denver CO 80239 Yes SGS North America Inc.

4665 Paris St, Suite B-200

Denver CO 80239 Yes SGS North America Inc.

4665 Paris St, Suite B-200

Denver CO 80239 Yes SGS North America, Inc.

4665 Paris St, Suite B-200

Denver CO 80239 Yes SGS North America Inc.

4665 Paris St, Suite B-200

Denver CO 80239 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12 St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12 St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12 St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th S

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th S

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12 St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes Minnesota Valley

Testing Laboratories, Inc. 1411 S 12th St

Bismarck ND 58502 Yes

Page 60fuel_shipment_samples

analysis_copies

Page 61fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL 1943 001 1/11/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.05 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 002 2/07/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.02 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 003 3/03/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.05 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 004 4/09/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.08 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 005 5/03/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.05 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 006 6/25/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.03 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 008 8/03/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.05 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 009 9/08/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.03 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 010 10/20/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.05 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 011 11/01/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.04 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 012 12/01/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.05 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 001 1/15/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.133 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 002 2/1/2009 Mercury (Hg) 0.165 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 003 3/1/2009 Mercury (Hg) 0.126 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 004 4/01/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.138 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 005 5/01/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.085 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 006 5/09/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.151 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 007 7/01/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.176 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 008 8/01/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.091 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 009 8/31/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.068 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 010 10/01/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.062 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 011 11/01/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.125 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 012 12/01/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.095 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8222 001 1/07/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.162 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8222 003 2/10/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.329 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8222 005 3/04/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.155 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8222 007 5/21/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.14 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8222 009 6/10/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.153 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8222 011 7/29/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.08 percent (dry) (%) FALSE 8222 013 8/10/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.09 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8222 015 9/15/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.095 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8222 017 10/12/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.098 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8222 018 11/09/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.071 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8222 020 12/11/09 Mercury (Hg) 0.094 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE

Page 62test_reports

facility _id report_id report_type other_type report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test

other engineering Carbon monoxide test for engineering analysis

4/11/2006 4/11/2006 No No 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test - Unit 3

other engineering Carbon monoxide emissions engineering test

######## ######## No No 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test

other parametric Carbon monoxide parametric test for engineering analysis to determine a relationship between excess oxygen in the flue gas leaving the boiler and CO emissions. 12/4/2008 12/4/2008 No No 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test - #3

other parametric Carbon monoxide parametric test for engineering analysis to determine a relationship between excess oxygen in the flue gas leaving the boiler and CO emissions. 12/2/2008 12/2/2008 No No 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test

compliance Carbon monoxide emissions test as required by the Title V permit 12/3/2008 12/3/2008 No No 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test - Unit 3

compliance Carbon monoxide emissions test as required by the Title V permit 12/1/2008 12/1/2008 No No 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test other research Large-scale testing of enhanced mercury removal for subbituminous coal conducted by the Energy

& Environm ental Research Center 10/6/2005 ######## Yes No 1943 Mercury

Performance Test compliance Mercury emissions test as required by the Title V permit ######## ######## No No 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 compliance Mercury emissions test as required by the Title V permit. ######## ######## No No 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

other parametric Parameteric test (filterable, organic, and condensable) for engineering analysis to determine a relationship between unit 3 electrostatic precipitator electrical power and opacity readings. ######## ######## No No 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

compliance Particulate emissions test (filterable, organic, and condensable) as required by the Title V permit. 8/16/2006 8/16/2006 No No 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

compliance Particulate emissions (filterable, organic, and condensable) test as required by the Title V permit 8/24/2006 8/24/2006 No No 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

other Engineering informational test HCL and HF Emission Engineering Test for information purposes using EPA Method 26A.

5/14/2009 5/14/2009 No No 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test other Contractual Obligation Test to fulfill contractual obligation upon installation of continuous mercury monitor in prepoaratio for CAMR. 9/29/2008 9/30/2008 No No 6098 Particulate Emissions Test

compliance Particulete Emissions Test (filterable) - Method 5 was used in compliance with the requirement of the Title V permit. 5/14/2009 5/14/2009 No No 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test other Contractual Obligation Test to fulfill contractual obligation upon installation of continuous mercury emission monitor in preparation of CAMR. 10/6/2008 10/7/2008 No No 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

compliance Particulate Emissions Test (filterable and condensible) - Method 5 was used for the filterable portion as required by the Title V permit. Method 202 was used as an informatin test for the condensible portion. 7/25/2007 7/25/2007 No No

Page 63test_reports

deviation_reports No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No

Page 64test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test

3 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test - Unit 3

3 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test

2 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test - #3

3 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test

2 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test - Unit 3

3 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test 3 1943 Mercury

Performance Test 2 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 3 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

3 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

2 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

3 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

001 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test 001 6098 Particulate Emissions Test

001 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test 001 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

001

Page 65test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test

subbituminous 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test - Unit 3

subbitumionous 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test

subbituminous 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test - #3

subbituminous 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test

subbituminous 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test - Unit 3

subbituminous 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test subbituminous 1943 Mercury

Performance Test subbituminous 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 subbituminous 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

subbituminous 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

subbituminous 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

subbituminous 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

subbituminous 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test subbituminous 6098 Particulate Emissions Test

subbituminous 8222 Mercury

Em isson Test lignite 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

Lignite

Page 66test_report_fuel_types

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_type percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test - Unit 3

subbitumionous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test - #3

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test - Unit 3

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1943 Mercury

Performance Test subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6098 Particulate Emissions Test

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 8222 Mercury

Em isson Test lignite coal - lignite 100 100 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

Lignite coal - lignite 100 100

Page 67cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description

Page 68cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e

Page 69test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_bypass_percent

testing_bypass_percent 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test

ESP3Out No No 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out No No 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP2Out No No 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test - #3

ESP3Out No No 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test

ESP2Out No No 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out No No 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet No No 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out No No 1943 Mercury

Performance Test ESP2Out No No 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 ESP3Out No No 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP3Out No No 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

ESP2Out No No 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out No No 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack PortsNo No 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack PortsNo No 6098 Particulate Emissions Test

Stack PortsNo No 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts No No 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

StackPorts No No

Page 70test_report_sampling

fg_fraction The entire flue gas flow was sampled. The entire flue gas flow was sampled. The entire flue gas flow was sampled The entire flue gas flow was sampled The entire flue gas flow was sampled The entire flue gas flow was sampled. The entire flue gas flow was sampled The entire flue gas flow was sampled. The entire flue gas flow was sampled. The entire flue gas flow was sampled. The entire flue gas flow was sampled. The entire flue gas flow as sampled. The entire flue gas flow was sampled. The entire flue gas flow was sampled. The entire flue gas flow was sampled. The entire flue gas flow was sampled. Entire flue gas flow was samples The entire flue gas flow was sampled.

Page 71sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test

ESP3Out 1 4/11/2006 4/11/2006 77 7.85 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test

ESP3Out 2 4/11/2006 4/11/2006 77 9.02 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test

ESP3Out 3 4/11/2006 4/11/2006 77 8.79 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 1 ######## ######## 78 9.19 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 2 ######## ######## 78 9.83 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 3 ######## ######## 78 9.54 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP2Out 1 12/4/2008 12/4/2008 54.8 9.77 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP2Out 2 12/4/2008 12/4/2008 54.7 9.68 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP2Out 3 12/4/2008 12/4/2008 54.2 9.93 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test - #3

ESP3Out 1 12/2/2008 12/2/2008 77.3 11.59 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test - #3

ESP3Out 2 12/2/2008 12/2/2008 77.2 10.86 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test - #3

ESP3Out 3 12/2/2008 12/2/2008 77.2 11.79 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test

ESP2Out 1 12/3/2008 12/3/2008 58 9.76 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test

ESP2Out 2 12/3/2008 12/3/2008 57.8 9.57 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test

ESP2Out 3 12/3/2008 12/3/2008 57.8 9.62 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 1 12/1/2008 12/1/2008 78.4 10.82 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 2 12/1/2008 12/1/2008 78.4 10.79 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 3 12/1/2008 12/1/2008 78.4 11.07 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 1 10/6/2005 10/6/2005 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 10 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 11 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 12 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 2 10/7/2005 10/7/2005 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 3 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 4 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 5 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 6 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 7 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 8 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 9 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 1 10/6/2005 10/6/2005 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 10 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 11 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 12 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 2 10/7/2005 10/7/2005 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 3 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 4 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 5 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 6 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 7 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 8 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 9 ######## ######## 1943 Mercury

Performance Test ESP2Out 1 ######## ######## 54.6 1943 Mercury

Performance Test ESP2Out 2 ######## ######## 54.7 1943 Mercury

Performance Test ESP2Out 3 ######## ######## 54.6 1943 Mercury

Performance Test ESP2Out 4 ######## ######## 54.63 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 ESP3Out 1 ######## ######## 77 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 ESP3Out 2 ######## ######## 77 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 ESP3Out 3 ######## ######## 77.2 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP3Out 1 ######## ######## 78.1 9.2 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP3Out 2 ######## ######## 78.1 9.84

Page 72sampling_runs

1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP3Out 3 ######## ######## 78.1 9.55 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

ESP2Out 1 8/16/2006 8/16/2006 58.3 8.35 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

ESP2Out 2 8/16/2006 8/16/2006 58.2 9.53 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

ESP2Out 3 8/16/2006 8/16/2006 58.1 9.72 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 1 8/24/2006 8/24/2006 78.3 10.48 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 2 8/24/2006 8/24/2006 78.5 10.5 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 3 8/24/2006 8/24/2006 78.3 10.29 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports 1 5/14/2009 5/14/2009 474 11.5 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports2 5/14/2009 5/14/2009 474 11.46 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports3 5/14/2009 5/14/2009 474 12.43 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports 1 9/29/2008 9/29/2008 453.7 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports2 9/30/2008 9/30/2008 463.1 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports3 9/30/2008 9/30/2008 463 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports

4 9/30/2008 9/30/2008 463.2 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports6 9/30/2008 9/30/2008 463.1 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports7 9/30/2008 9/30/2008 463.1 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports8 9/30/2008 9/30/2008 463 6098 Particulate Emissions Test

Stack Ports 1 5/14/2009 5/14/2009 474 11.48 6098 Particulate Emissions Test

Stack Ports2 5/14/2009 5/14/2009 474 11.46 6098 Particulate Emissions Test

Stack Ports3 5/14/2009 5/14/2009 474 11.8 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 1 10/6/2008 10/6/2008 432.7 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 2 10/7/2008 10/7/2008 426.1 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 3 10/7/2008 10/7/2008 426.1 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 4 10/7/2008 10/7/2008 426.2 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 5 10/7/2008 10/7/2008 426.2 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 6 10/7/2008 10/7/2008 426.2 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 7 10/7/2008 10/7/2008 426.2 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

StackPorts 2 7/25/2007 7/25/2007 425 16.76 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

StackPorts 3 7/25/2007 7/25/2007 425 17.24 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

StackPorts 4 7/25/2007 7/25/2007 425 17.17

Page 73sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 195108 dscfm 6.56 12.91 1 182192 dscfm 6.62 12.78 1 175648 dscfm 6.59 12.77 1 202486 dscfm 4.53 14.12 1 201332 dscfm 4.52 14.35 1 199885 dscfm 4.49 14.32 1 137324 dscfm 6.18 13.41 1 132468 dscfm 5.96 13.65 1 131687 dscfm 5.39 14.11 1 181278 dscfm 4.71 14.79 1 182371 dscfm 4.59 14.79 1 180495 dscfm 4.45 15.02 1 149050 dscfm 6.92 12.83 1 147705 dscfm 6.74 13 1 148651 dscfm 6.83 12.96 1 193931 dscfm 5.38 14.19 1 188645 dscfm 5.41 14.15 1 193352 dscfm 5.39 14.12 1

1 1 1 4 1 1 1 202451 dscfm 4.53 14.12 1 201297 dscfm 4.52 14.34 1

Page 74sampling_runs

199851 dscfm 4.49 14.31 1 196036 dscfm 8.15 9.58 1 192996 dscfm 8.1 9.56 1 190089 dscfm 7.84 9.54 1 233064 dscfm 6.33 12.61 1 222264 dscfm 6.29 13.21 1 221792 dscfm 6.16 13.12 1 1193624 dscfm 6.3 12.66 292 1216746 dscfm 6.61 12.36 300 1223549 dscfm 6.04 12.93 300 280 275 277 284 292 294 296 1192362 dscfm 6.3 12.66 292 1201750 dscfm 6.61 12.36 299 1223688 dscfm 6.04 12.93 299 215.9 205 206.1 205.9 205.9 205.7 206.6 1289123 dscfm 7.5 11.9 221 1264025 dscfm 7.1 11.2 220 1309744 dscfm 7.6 11.9 221

Page 75sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value 27.766 Method 10 27.678 Method 10 27.6929 Method 10 28.367 Method 10 28.367 Method 10 28.367 Method 10 28.481 Method 10 28.459 Method 10 28.436 Method 10 27.57 Method 10 27.556 Method 10 27.548 Method 10 28.104 Method 10 28.096 Method 10 28.089 Method 10 28.001 Method 10 28.008 Method 10 27.971 Method 10

CMM subbituminous CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM CMM Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B subbituminous 54.6 5.91 12439 Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B subbituminous 77.2 5.89 12564 Method 5 and Method 202

Parametric testing - 1/2 ESP field 1, 1/2 ESP field 3 and all of field 2 out of service. Method 5 and Method 202

Parametric testing - all of ESP field 1 and field 3 out of service

Page 76sampling_runs

Method 5 and Method 202

Parametric testing - all ESP field 1 and field 2 out of service for 35 minutes of test. 1/2 ESP field 1, 1.2 field 3 and all of field 2 out of service for the remainder of the test.

subbituminous 78.1 6.79 12289 Method 5 and Method 202 Method 5 and Method 202 Method 5 and Method 202 subbituminous 58 5.49 12508 Method 5 and Method 202 Method 5 and Method 202 Method 5 and Method 202 subbituminous 78.3 6.96 12282 EPA Method 26A subbituminous 474 418501 7.22 12063 EPA Method 26A subbituminous 474 424252 7.2 11978 EPA Method 26A

The HF results were less than the detectable level.

subbituminous 474 422905 6.86 12066 Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B subbituminous 463 7.58 11848 Method 5 subbituminous 474 7.22 12063 Method 5 subbituminous 474 7.2 11978 Method 5 subbituminous 474 6.86 12066 Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B Method 30B lignite 426 14.81 12362 Method 5 as required by Titlle V Permit and Method 202 for informational purposes EPA Method 5 as required by Title V Permit and Method 202 for informational purposes EPA Method 5 as required by Title V Permit and Method 202 for informational purposes

Page 77sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur

0.45

Parametric testing - 1/2 ESP field 1, 1/2 ESP field 3 and all of field 2 out of service.

Page 78sampling_runs

0.62

0.4

0.44 0.45 0.4 0.39

0.39 0.45 0.4 0.39

1.41 Method 5 as required by Titlle V Permit and Method 202 for informational purposes EPA Method 5 as required by Title V Permit and Method 202 for informational purposes EPA Method 5 as required by Title V Permit and Method 202 for informational purposes

Page 79sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 6.7 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.8 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 3 Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.4 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 4 Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.4 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 5 Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.8 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 6 Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.9 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 7 Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.4 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

StackPorts 2 PM (Filterable) 0.00322 FALSE 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

StackPorts 2 PM (Condensable) 0.014273 FALSE 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

StackPorts 3 PM (Filterable) 0.00416 FALSE 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

StackPorts 3 PM (Condensable) 0.013081 FALSE 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

StackPorts 4 PM (Filterable) 0.0041 FALSE 8222 Particulate Emissions Test

StackPorts 4 PM (Condensable) 0.0135 FALSE 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.99 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.87 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports3 Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.7 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports

4 Total Mercury (Hgt) 10.24 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports6 Total Mercury (Hgt) 10.1 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports7 Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.9 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports8 Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.3 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6098 Particulate Emissions Test

Stack Ports 1 PM (Filterable) 0.00652 FALSE 6098 Particulate Emissions Test

Stack Ports2 PM (Filterable) 0.00474 FALSE 6098 Particulate Emissions Test

Stack Ports3 PM (Filterable) 0.00547 FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports 1 Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) 1.17 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports 1 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) 0.732 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports2 Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) 1.24 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports2 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) 0.941 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports3 Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) 1.66 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports3 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) 0 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) TRUE 0.673 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test

ESP3Out 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 197.9 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test

ESP3Out 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 258.3 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test

ESP3Out 3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 276.8 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 6.559 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 4.701 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 5.262 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP2Out 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 4.205 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP2Out 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 23.468 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP2Out 3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 134.724 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test - #3

ESP3Out 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 74.92 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test - #3

ESP3Out 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 97.01 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Engineering/Parametric Test - #3

ESP3Out 3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 128.298 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test

ESP2Out 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 3.543 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test

ESP2Out 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 16.875 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test

ESP2Out 3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 10.868 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 34.085 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 33.591 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Carbon Monoxide Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 21.193 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 3 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 4 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE

Page 80sampling_run_pollutants1

1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 5 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 6 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 7 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 8 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 9 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 10 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 11 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 12 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 3 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 4 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 5 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 6 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 7 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 8 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 9 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 10 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 11 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Out 12 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 1943 Mercury

Performance Test ESP2Out 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 2.529 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1943 Mercury

Performance Test ESP2Out 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 3.0491 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1943 Mercury

Performance Test ESP2Out 3 Total Mercury (Hgt) 3.8385 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1943 Mercury

Performance Test ESP2Out 4 Total Mercury (Hgt) 4.6534 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 ESP3Out 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 3.4269 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 ESP3Out 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 2.7914 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 ESP3Out 3 Total Mercury (Hgt) 3.3154 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP3Out 1 PM (Filterable) 0.07017 FALSE 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP3Out 1 PM (Condensable) 0.071002 FALSE 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP3Out 2 PM (Filterable) 0.05898 FALSE 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP3Out 2 PM (Condensable) 0.061598 FALSE 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP3Out 3 PM (Filterable) 0.09765 FALSE 1943 Particulate Engineering/Parametric Test

ESP3Out 3 PM (Condensable) 0.099234 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

ESP2Out 1 PM (Filterable) 0.01066 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

ESP2Out 1 PM (Condensable) 0.017832 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

ESP2Out 2 PM (Filterable) 0.01565 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

ESP2Out 2 PM (Condensable) 0.023063 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

ESP2Out 3 PM (Filterable) 0.02002 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 2

ESP2Out 3 PM (Condensable) 0.029338 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 1 PM (Filterable) 0.02866 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 1 PM (Condensable) 0.028937 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 2 PM (Filterable) 0.02271 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 2 PM (Condensable) 0.023588 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 3 PM (Filterable) 0.03294 FALSE 1943 Particulate Performance Test - Unit 3

ESP3Out 3 PM (Condensable) 0.033271 FALSE

Page 81sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 35.607 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.007 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 157.711 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.031 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc.- gr/dscf 45.107 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.009 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 141.726 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.028 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 45.073 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.009 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 148.527 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.029 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 66.604 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.013 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 48.817 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.01 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 57.385 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.011 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc.- gr/dscf 7.92 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0016 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 2.7202 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.00053 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 8.6 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0017 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 3.565 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0007 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 11.52 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0022 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0 pound per hour (lb/hr)

TRUE 2.5638 0 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) TRUE 0.00048 168.3 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.205 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 205.2 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.269 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 212 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.287 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 5.79 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.006 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 4.13 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.004 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 4.59 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.005 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 2.52 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.004 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 13.56 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.023 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 77.38 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.128 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 59.24 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.068 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 77.16 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.088 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 101 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.114 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 2.3 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.004 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 10.87 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.017 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 7.05 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.011 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 28.83 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.032 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 27.64 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.032 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 17.87 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.02 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 4.82 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 5.28 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 3.28 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 4.32 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE

Page 82sampling_run_pollutants1

FALSE 2.99 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 2.72 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 1.94 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 2.59 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 2.58 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 2.83 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 2.6 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 2.77 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 5.11 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 5.79 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 3.95 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 2.81 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 1.63 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 1.63 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 1.21 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 1.12 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 0.98 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 0.79 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 0.74 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 0.32 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 121.747 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.125 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc.- gr/dscf 123.209 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.127 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 101.746 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.105 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 106.281 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.11 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 167.248 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.174 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 169.988 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.177 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 17.906 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.024 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 29.963 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.041 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 25.878 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.036 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 38.152 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.053 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 32.607 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.045 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 47.801 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.066 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 57.242 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.57 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 57.807 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.058 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 43.26 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.045 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 44.938 kilogram per hour (kg/hr)

FALSE 0.047 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 62.611 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.065 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf 63.25 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.066 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE conc. - gr/dscf

Page 83sampling_run_pollutants1

run_pollutant_comment

conc. - gr/dscf conc.- gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf

conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc.- gr/dscf

Page 84sampling_run_pollutants1

conc.- gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf conc. - gr/dscf

Page 85sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 1 Mercury (Hg) 0.0312 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 10 Mercury (Hg) 0.0357 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 11 Mercury (Hg) 0.0319 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 12 Mercury (Hg) 0.0319 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 2 Mercury (Hg) 0.0465 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 3 Mercury (Hg) 0.0286 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 5 Mercury (Hg) 0.0357 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 6 Mercury (Hg) 0.04 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 7 Mercury (Hg) 0.4 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 8 Mercury (Hg) 0.049 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

DOE Research Test ESP3Inlet 9 Mercury (Hg) 0.0533 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

Performance Test ESP2Out 4 Mercury (Hg) 0.06 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 1943 Mercury

Performance Test - Unit 3 ESP3Out 3 Mercury (Hg) 0.05 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports 1 Chloride (Cl) 0.004 percent (dry) (%) FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports 1 Fluoride (F) 0.005 percent (dry) (%) FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports2 Chloride (Cl) 0.003 percent (dry) (%) FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports2 Fluoride (F) 0.005 percent (dry) (%) FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports3 Chloride (Cl) 0.003 percent (dry) (%) FALSE 6098 HCl and HF Emission Engineering Test

Stack Ports3 Fluoride (F) 0.005 percent (dry) (%) FALSE 6098 Mercury

Em issions Test Stack Ports8 Mercury (Hg) 0.071 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 8222 Mercury

Em ission Test StackPorts 7 Mercury (Hg) 0.115 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE

Page 86sampling_run_fuel

fuel_conc_MDL

Page 87