alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 414.27 Maintaining the continued accuracy of the safety element approval application. ( a ) The holder of a safety element approval must ensure the continued accuracy and completeness of representations contained in the safety element approval application, on which the approval was issued, for the entire term of the safety element approval.
( b ) If any representation contained in the application that is material to public health and safety or safety of property ceases to be accurate and complete, the safety element approval holder must prepare and submit a revised application according to § 414.13 or § 414.15 under this part. The safety element approval holder must point out any part of the safety element approval or the associated application that would be changed or affected by a proposed modification. The FAA will review and make a determination on the revised application under the terms of this part.
#### Bellows *v.*Sowles *et al.*

*(Circuit Court, D. Vermont.*

October 25, 1892.)

Equity—Parties—Bill to Recover Legacy.

A legatee Tinder a will brought a bill against the executor and against the receiver of a bank to reach property of the testator held by the bank, and moved that other legatees of the same amount be made parties. *Held,*that there was no ground for compelling the other legatees to become parties to the suit, for, though they claimed in the same right, they did not claim the same trust property, but merely their separate shares in the avails of it, if any, after the assets had been collected and distributed in some way by decree of the probate court.

In Equity. Suit by Frederick Bellows against Edward A. Sowles, as executor of the wills of Hiram and Susan Bellows, and against Chester W. Witters, as receiver of the First National Bank of St. Albans. Motion by complainant for an order of court making Charles Bellows and Bert Bellows parties to the suit. Denied.

*Chester W. Witters, pro se.*

Wheeler, District Judge.

The orator and his brothers, Charles and Bert, are alleged to be legatees of $2,000 each in the wills of Hiram and Susan Bellows, of which the defendant Sowles is executor. He has brought this suit in behalf of himself and all others in like interest who will join him in it, to reach real and personal estate which was of the testators acquired by the First National Bank of St. Albans, of which the defendant Witters is receiver. They have not -joined in the suit, and this defendant moves that they be made parties, as claimants of the same property, by order of court. But these legatees are not claimants of the same property. Each claims a separate legacy of $2,000 in money. In this state, jurisdiction of distribution of estates of deceased persons is vested exclusively in the probate courts. The equity jurisdiction of this court cannot be restrained by statutes of the state. *Wayman v. Southard,*10 Wheat. 1; *Beers*v. *Haughton,*9 Bet. 329. But the rights of the parties are to be ascertained by the laws of the state. The legacies are not made chargeable upon any of the property, and neither of the legatees is entitled to a decree against the receiver merely because the legacies are unpaid, and he has assets of the estates. The assets must be got together, and be distributed by decree under the will in some way, before either will be entitled to them. *Boyden*v. *Ward,*38 Vt. 628. The legatees claim in the same right, but that is not enough to warrant forcing either to become a party to a suit of the other. They do not claim the same trust- property in litigation before the court, but merely their separate shares in the avails of it, if any. No ground appears for compelling them to become parties to another’s suit. Motion denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*Jacob Goldinger, Respondent.

(Argued October 22, 1936;

decided November 24, 1936.)

*William F. X. Geoghan, District Attorney (George F. Palmer, Jr.,*of counsel), for appellant.

*635
      *Myron D. Levy, amicus cwrise.*

*Lewis Goldinger*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4446 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4446

 To waive affiliation rules under the paycheck protection program for 
Tribal business concerns with the same employer identification number, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 2020

Mr. Bennet (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                 on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To waive affiliation rules under the paycheck protection program for 
Tribal business concerns with the same employer identification number, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Business Access to PPP Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF AFFILIATION RULES UNDER THE PAYCHECK PROTECTION 
              PROGRAM FOR TRIBAL BUSINESS CONCERNS WITH SAME EIN.

    Section 7(a)(36)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
636(a)(36)(D)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (v), by striking ``, veterans organization, 
        or Tribal business concern'' and inserting ``or veterans 
        organization''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(vii) No affiliation between tribal 
                        business concerns based on shared ein.--During 
                        the covered period, for purposes of determining 
                        eligibility for a covered loan, affiliation 
                        shall not be found under section 121.103 of 
                        title 13, Code of Federal Regulations, or any 
                        successor regulation, between Tribal business 
                        concerns described in section 31(b)(2)(C) based 
                        solely on a shared employer identification 
                        number.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Charles Wilson *v.*Giovanni Ferrari.

1. A motion will not be entertained, to strike from an answer the statements of fact, alleged as probable cause, in defense of an action for malicious prosecution. -

2. In suck case, a demurrer would lie, if tke facts as stated did not constitute a probable cause.

Special Term. — The action was to recover damages for a malicious prosecution of the plaintiff, in the police court of Cincinnati, on a charge of larceny, made by the defendant. The answer set out, in detail, the facts and circumstances under which the charge had been made, and claimed that they constituted probable cause, which was the defense to the ación. A motion was made to strike out that part of the answer stating the facts, leaving only the conclusion that there was probable cause.

*Parker & Parker,*for plaintiff.

*T.*A. *Logan*and *E. P. Norton,*for defendant.

Gholson, J.

It was proper to state the facts, so that the court might determine whether they would constitute probable cause or *not;*if the facts as stated would not constitute probable cause, and were therefore irrelevant, the proper course would be to demur to the answer. The motion to strike out is therefore overruled.
EXHIBIT 32.1 -- CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER OF FIRST CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL, INC., PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.


I, Alex Genin, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
First  Capital  International,  Inc.  hereby  certify  that  First  Capital
International, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10QSB and the financial statements
contained therein fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15  U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that
information  contained  in  the  periodic report on Form 10QSB and the financial
statements  contained  therein  fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  the  operations  of  First  Capital
International,  Inc.


Date: July 28, 2006           /s/ Alex Genin
                              Chief Executive  Officer  and
                              Acting Chief  Financial  Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP91-229-028]

Take notice that on May 1, 2000, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets as listed in Appendix A attached to the filing, to be effective June 1, 2000.

                    Panhandle states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with Ordering Paragraph (A) of the Commission's Order Accepting Settlement and Authorizing Abandonment (Order) issued on August 28, 1992 in Docket No. RP91-229-000,                     *et al.,*                     60 FERC ¶ 61,212 (1992).                

Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all affected customers, applicable state regulatory agencies and parties to this proceeding.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11613  Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 27.177 Static directional stability. ( a ) The directional controls must operate in such a manner that the sense and direction of motion of the rotorcraft following control displacement are in the direction of the pedal motion with the throttle and collective controls held constant at the trim conditions specified in § 27.175(a), (b), and (c). Sideslip angles must increase with steadily increasing directional control deflection for sideslip angles up to the lesser of— ( 1 ) ±25 degrees from trim at a speed of 15 knots less than the speed for minimum rate of descent varying linearly to ±10 degrees from trim at VNE;
( 2 ) The steady state sideslip angles established by § 27.351;
( 3 ) A sideslip angle selected by the applicant, which corresponds to a sideforce of at least 0.1g; or
( 4 ) The sideslip angle attained by maximum directional control input.
( b ) Sufficient cues must accompany the sideslip to alert the pilot when the aircraft is approaching the sideslip limits.
( c ) During the maneuver specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the sideslip angle versus directional control position curve may have a negative slope within a small range of angles around trim, provided the desired heading can be maintained without exceptional piloting skill or alertness.
[Amdt. 27-44, 73 FR 11000, Feb. 29, 2008]
§ 49.31 Applicability. This subpart applies to the recording of the following kinds of conveyances: ( a ) A bill of sale, contract of conditional sale, assignment of an interest under a contract of conditional sale, mortgage, assignment of mortgage, lease, equipment trust, notice of tax lien or of other lien, or other instrument affecting title to, or any interest in, aircraft.
( b ) A release, cancellation, discharge, or satisfaction of a conveyance named in paragraph (a) of this section.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mojave Southern, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Netta Girard, Secretary, Treasurer and Principle Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

\s\               Netta GirardNetta GirardSecretary and Treasurer

August 14, 2002

----
Exhibit 10(a)  


[SUTHERLAND
ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP LETTERHEAD] 


April 22,
2003 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 280 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 



Directors: 


        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 6
to the registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-81553) filed by Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 



	 	 	Sincerely,
	

 	
 	

SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ David S. Goldstein
 David S. Goldstein
#### § 29.1589 Loading information.

There must be loading instructions for each possible loading condition between the maximum and minimum weights determined under § 29.25 that can result in a center of gravity beyond any extreme prescribed in § 29.27, assuming any probable occupant weights.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Pearson Ridge quadrangle,Oregon : 7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:45118-A 6/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000932093
 
January 24, 2018
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 70005

WALTER ALEXANDER SORTO,

Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v. LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,
Respondent

– Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10

- CV

- 613

O N PETITION FOR REHEARING Before JOLLY, DE NNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * On December 1, 2016, this Court issued a nondispositive opinion denyin g certificates of appealability with respect to Petitioner

– Appellant Walter Alexander Sorto’s Miranda and ineffectiv e assistance of counsel claims. Sorto
v. Davis , 672 F. App’ x 342 (5th Cir. 2016) (per curiam). T he opinion reserved

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 28, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-70005 Document: 00514406286 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2018No. 16

- 70005

2 judgment on the issue of whether the district court abus ed its discretion in denying requests for funding that would have enabled Sorto to obtain testing to determine whether he has an intellectual disability. Id. at 344. We issued an opinion on that issue. Sorto v. Davis , 859 F.3d 356 (5th Cir. 2017). Responde nt

– Appellee Lorie Davis, the director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division (the “Director”) filed a petition for rehearing en banc. After considering the Director’s petition, we granted panel rehearing and withdre w the prior opinion. Sorto v. Davis , 881 F.3d 933 (5th Cir. 2018) (mem. op.). On March 21, 2018, the Supreme Court issued Ayestas v. Davis , which rejected our Circuit’s standard for determining whether investigative funds pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599(f) are “reasonably necessary.” See No. 16

– 6795, 2018 WL 1402425 (Mar. 21, 2018)

. Because the district court has not had the opportunity to consider how Ayestas might apply to the denials of funding in this case , we believe the issue is best considered by the district court in the first instance

. See , e.g. , Frey v. Stephens , 616 F. App’x 704, 708 (5th Cir. 2015) (noting that we have re manded habeas cases for reconsideration “where relevant binding decisions were issued after the district court ruled ” ); Thomas

v

. Quarterman , 272 F. App’x 406, 409 (5th Cir. 2008) (remanding for consideration of an intervening circuit case)

. Accordingly , we VACATE the district court’s denial s of funding and REMAND for i ts consideration of its denials of funding in light of Ayestas

. Case: 16-70005 Document: 00514406286 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2018
Editorial Note on Part 294
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 294 appear at 84 FR 15934, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 294.22 Notification to the Department of change in operations or identifying information. Registrants shall refile a copy of OST Form 4505 with the Department's Office of International Aviation, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing/Special Authorities Division, upon any of the following events. The refiling shall be sent by electronic mail, or other means, so as to be received by the Department not later than 30 days after the reported event has occurred. ( a ) The carrier changes its name. When a carrier refiles OST Form 4505 to indicate a change of name: ( 1 ) A registration ceases to be in effect unless the Government of Canada amends the registrant's Air Carrier Operating Certificate to reflect the registrant's new name within 60 days of the name change and the registrant submits to the Department a copy of its amended Canadian authority.
( 2 ) The registrant must also refile three copies of Agreement 18900 (OST Form 4523) under its new name;
( 3 ) The registrant must also refile its certificate of insurance under its new name; and
( 4 ) The registrant must also advise the appropriate FAA office referred to in § 294.33 of the carrier's new name.
( b ) The carrier changes its designated agent.
( c ) A change occurs in the carrier's ownership and control resulting in a person acquiring a beneficial or voting interest in the registrant of 10 percent or more. The name(s), address(es), citizenship(s), and percentages of ownership of the new owners shall be indicated on the form. Acquisition of ownership interest by persons who are not citizens of the country of citizenship of the registrant may invalidate the registration.
( d ) The carrier temporarily or permanently ceases operations.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3024-0051) [ER-1257, 46 FR 52591, Oct. 27, 1981, as amended by ER-1363, 48 FR 46265, Oct. 12, 1983; Doc. No. 47939, 57 FR 40102, Sept. 2, 1992; 60 FR 43526, Aug. 22, 1995; 71 FR 49347, Aug. 23, 2006]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice of to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than May 26, 2000.

                    A.                     **Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:                

                    1.                     *Francis O. Bourg, Jr., Francis O. Bourg, III, Augustine Bourg Taylor, Josephine Bourg Junot, and Dean Paul Chauvin, Jr.*, (collectively) Houma, Louisiana; to acquire additional voting shares of South Louisiana Financial Corporation, Houma, Louisiana, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of South Louisiana Bank, Houma, Louisiana.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 8, 2000.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 00-11880 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P