alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix 6: HYSPLIT Trajectories 

for the Davidsonville, Prince 

George’s Equestrian Center and 

Howard University—Beltsville by 

Group
Figure 6A-1 Davidsonville & Howard U-Beltsville 2008-2010 Group 1 Days (<= 0.078 ppm)

Howard Uni--

-Beltsville 

(Prince 

George’s Co., 

MD) 

(240330030)

Davidsonville 

(Anne 

Arundel Co., 

MD) 

(240030014)
Figure 6A-2 Davidsonville & Howard U-Beltsville 2008-2010 Group 2 Days (>=0.079 & <= 0.081 

ppm)

Howard Uni--

-Beltsville 

(Prince 

George’s Co., 

MD) 

(240330030)

Davidsonville 

(Anne 

Arundel Co., 

MD) 

(240030014)
Figure 6A-3 Davidsonville & Howard U-Beltsville 2008-2010 Group 3 Days (>=0.082 & <= 0.086 

ppm)

Howard Uni--

-Beltsville 

(Prince 

George’s Co., 

MD) 

(240330030)

Davidsonville 

(Anne 

Arundel Co., 

MD) 

(240030014)
Figure 6A-4 Davidsonville & Howard U-Beltsville 2008-2010 Group 4 Days (>=0.087 & <= 0.090 

ppm)

Howard Uni--

-Beltsville 

(Prince 

George’s Co., 

MD) 

(240330030)

Davidsonville 

(Anne 

Arundel Co., 

MD) 

(240030014)
Figure 6A-5 Davidsonville & Howard U-Beltsville 2008-2010 Group 5 Days (>= 0.091 ppm)

Davidsonville 

(Anne 

Arundel Co., 

MD) 

(240030014)

Howard Uni--

-Beltsville 

(Prince 

George’s Co., 

MD) 

(240330030)
Figure 6A-6 Davidsonville & Howard U-Beltsville 2006-2007 Group 1 Days (>=0.076 & <= 0.078 

ppm)
Figure 6A-7 Davidsonville & Howard U-Beltsville 2006-2007 Group 2 Days (>=0.079 & <= 0.081 

ppm)
Figure 6A-8 Davidsonville & Howard U-Beltsville 2006-2007 Group 3 Days (>=0.082 & <= 0.086 

ppm)
Figure 6A-9 Davidsonville & Howard U-Beltsville 2006-2007 Group 4 Days (>=0.087 & <= 0.090 

ppm)
Figure 6A-10 Davidsonville & Howard U-Beltsville 2006-2007 Group 5 Days (>=0.091 ppm)
Figure 6A-11 Prince George’s Equestrian Center (AQS ID No. 240338003 Group 1 

(0.076 to 0.078 ppm) – Select days 2006 to 2007
Figure 6A-12 Prince George’s Equestrian Center (AQS ID No. 240338003 Group 2 

(0.079 to 0.081 ppm) – Select days 2006 to 2007
Figure 6A-13 Prince George’s Equestrian Center (AQS ID No. 240338003 Group 3 

(0.082 to 0.086 ppm) – Select days 2006 to 2007
Figure 6A-14 Prince George’s Equestrian Center (AQS ID No. 240338003 Groups 4 and 

5 (0.087 to 0.090 and >= 0.091 ppm) – Select days 2006 to 2007

This monitor only had one Group 4 Day.

Group 4 

Day
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7539
W. A. MACGUIRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS BAUGH, Probation and Parole Officer; ROBIN HA RPER, Probation Officer; ALAN RASMUSSEN, Probation and Parole Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-776-R) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. W. A. MacGuire, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William A. MacGuire appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the court's dismissal of his complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). The notice of appeal brings up for review MacGuire's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint as well as the motion for reconsideration. See Dove v. CODESCO , 569 F.2d 807, 809 (4th Cir. 1978). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. MacGuire v. Baugh , No. CA-95- 776-R (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 1995; Sept. 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Knot, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Richard Szefc, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|





| | /s/ Richard Szefc      
| | -----------------------
| | Richard Szefc          
| | Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 13, 2007

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Allstates  WorldCargo,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007
as  filed  with  the  Securities and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"), I, Sam DiGiralomo, Chief Executive Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
         company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
         operations of the Company for the periods presented.


August 14, 2007

/s/ Sam DiGiralomo
President and Chief Executive Officer


This  certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
630 A.2d 1171

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Thomas Edward STAMEY.

Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 36,

Sept. Term, 1993.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Sept. 23, 1993.

*ORDER*

The Court having considered the petition to Consent to Inactive Status of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Thomas Edward Stamey in which Respondent agrees to be placed on inactive status by the Court, it is this 23rd day of September, 1993.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the consent of Thomas Edward Stamey to be placed on inactive status from the practice of law be and it is hereby granted, and it is

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Thomas Edward Stamey from the register of attorneys in this Court until further order of this Court and certify that fact to the trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Rule BV13.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis McGuire, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 15, 2008



| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| | /s/ DENNIS MCGUIRE           
| | Dennis McGuire               
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2970-2971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Subject; Notice of 
Meetings

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the 
following meetings.
    The meetings will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Initial Review Group, Research Centers in Minority Institutions 
Review Committee.
    Date: February 7, 2000.
    Open: 8 a.m. to 9 a.m.
    Agenda: To discuss program planning and program accomplishments.
    Place: Residence Inn, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Closed: 9 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: C. William Angus, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research 
Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7965, 301-435-0812.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel Research Centers in Minority Institutions.
    Date: February 8-9, 2000.
    Time: February 8, 2000, 8 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: C. William Angus, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research 
Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7965, 301-435-0812.


[[Page 2971]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 
93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 10, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-1137 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

O F T E X A S

NO. WR-90, 752-01

EX P ART E JOHNNY EA RL AL EX ANDE R, Appl icant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A WRIT OF HAB EA S CORP US

CAUSE NO. CR11-295A I N THE 235TH DI STRI CT COURT

F ROM COOK E COUNTY

P er cur iam

.

O P I N I O N

A ppl i can t was co n v i ct ed o f i n j ury t o a ch i l d caus i

n g s eri o us b o di l

y i n j ury an d s en

t en ced t o l i f

e

i m pri s o n m en t

. T h e E i gh

t h Co urt o f A

ppeal s af f i rm ed h i s co n

v i ct i o n

. A lexande r v. State, No

. 08-14-

00113-CR (T ex

. Ap p

. — E l Pas o

, A ugus t 17, 2016). A

ppl i can t f i l ed t h i s appl i cat i o n f

o r a wri t o f

h ab eas co rpus i

n t h e co un

t y o f co n v i ct i o n

, an d t h e di s t ri ct cl erk f o rwarded i

t t o t h i s Co urt

. See T E X

.

C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art

. 11. 07.

A ppl i can t co n t en ds t h at appel l at e co un s el was i n ef f ect i v e b eca us e co un s el f

ai l ed t o n o t i f

y h i m

wh en h i s di

rect appea l was af

f i rm ed an d di d n o t t i

m el y i n f o rm h i m o f h i s ri gh

t t o f i l e a pro s e pet i

t i o n

f o r di s cret i o n ary rev i ew. Ba s ed o n t h e reco rd, t h e t ri al co urt h as det erm i n ed t h at A

ppl i can t

, t h ro ugh

n o f aul t o f h i s o wn

, was den i ed t i m el y n o t i ce o f t h e Co urt o f A ppeal s ’ af f i rm an ce an d o f t h e ri gh

t t o2

f i l e a pro s e pet i

t i o n f o r di s cret i o n ary rev i ew.

Re l i ef i s gran

t ed. Smith v. Robbins

, 528 U.S

. 259 (2000) ; E x par te Mi ller

, 330 S. W

. 3d 610

(T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 2009). A

ppl i can t m ay f i l e an o ut -o f

-t i m e PDR o f t h e j udgm en

t o f t h e E i gh

t h Co urt

o f A ppeal s i n cas e nu m

be r 0 8

- 14-00113- CR t h at af f i rm ed h i s co n

v i ct i o n i n caus e n um b er CR 11-

00295 f ro m t h e 235t h Di s t ri ct Co urt o f Co o ke Co un t y

. A ppl i c a nt s hal l f

i l e h i s pet i

t i o n f o r

di s cret i o n ary rev i ew wi

t h t h i s Co urt wi

t h i n 30 day s o f t h e dat e o n wh i ch t h i s Co urt ’ s m an dat e i s s ues

.

Del i v ered: Dec em

b er 9, 2020

Do n o t pub l i s h
§ 308.7 Good faith certification. ( a ) *General requirement.* Every filing or submission of record following the issuance of a notice must be signed by at least one counsel of record in the counsel's individual name and must state that counsel's mailing address, electronic mail address, and telephone number. A party who acts as the party's own counsel must sign that person's individual name and state that person's mailing address, electronic mail address, and telephone number on every filing or submission of record. Electronic signatures may be used to satisfy the signature requirements of this section.
( b ) *Effect of signature.* ( 1 ) The signature of counsel or a party will constitute a certification: the counsel or party has read the filing or submission of record; to the best of the counsel's or party's knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the filing or submission of record is well-grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; and the filing or submission of record is not made for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.
( 2 ) If a filing or submission of record is not signed, the ALJ will strike the filing or submission of record, unless it is signed promptly after the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or movant.
( c ) *Effect of making oral motion or argument.* The act of making any oral motion or oral argument by any counsel or party constitutes a certification that to the best of the counsel's or party's knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the counsel's or party's statements are well-grounded in fact and are warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and are not made for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.
[No. 27743-3-II.

Division Two.

October 18, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kenneth William Johnson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 00-1-06174-1, Sergio Armijo, J., entered August 6, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Quinn-Brintnall, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CEO CERTIFICATION

Form of Certification Pursuant to Section
1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, John E.
Elliott, II, the Chief Executive Officer of Critical Home Care, Inc., certify
that, to the best of my knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Critical Home Care, Inc.

|                           |  | /s/ John E.
  Elliott, II             
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                           |  |                                       
|                           |  | Chairman and
  Chief Executive Officer
|Dated:   August
  20, 2004 |  |                                       

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Critical Home Care, Inc.  The statement
will be retained by Critical Home Care, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 170.1 Scope.

This subpart sets forth establishment and discontinuance criteria for navigation aids operated and maintained by the United States.
#### Lewis Barnard *versus*Samuel Graves and Trustee.

I pon a settlement of accounts between the defendant and the town of W, a check upon a bank payable to bearer was given by the town to the defendant, but it was agreed, that it should be placed in the hands of a selectman of the town, to whom the defendant was indebted, in order that he might procure the money from the bank and pay therewith his own demand and also a debt due from the defendant to the town, the amount of which was not ascertained at the time of such settlement. Whilst the check was in the hands of such selectman, the town was summoned as the trustee of the defendant. It was held, that the delivery of the check was a payment of the debt due from the town to the defendant, and therefore, that the town was not chargeable as his trustee.

Br the answer of Benjamin Butman, one of the selectmen of the town of Worcester, which was summoned as the trustee of the defendant, it appeared, that the defendant was employed by that town, for the sum of $350, to take charge of its paupers for one year, commencing April 1, 1833 ; that on March 31, 1834, a settlement of accounts was made on the part of the- town with the defendant, in anticipation of the close of the year, and that the selectmen gave him a check on the Worcester Bank, payable to him or the bearer, for the sum of $210, which was the balance due at the end of the year; that there being however a debt due from the defendant to the town, the amount of which was not then ascertained, it was agreed, that the amount of this debt, when ascertained, should be deducted from the sum to be obtained by the check ; that this debt was afterwards found to amount to the sum of $67-58; that the defendant being also indebted to Butman in the sum of $19-77, it was further agreed by the selectmen and the defendant, that the check should be placed in Butman’s hands, and the amount thereof paid to him by the bank, in order that he might' retain the sums due from the defendant to the town and to himself; and that the check was accordingly received by Butman, and was in his hands at the time of the service of the writ.

*Merrick*and *Isaac*Davis, for the plaintiff,

cited *Dennie*v. *Hart & Tr.*2 Pick. 204.

*C*Mien, for the trustee.

*42*Per Curiam.*

In the case of *Dennie*v. *Hart & Tr.*2 Pick. 204, the Court considered the transaction merely color-able ; that the depositary of the check was the agent of the trustee himself; and that the trustee had the control of it, and might revoke it when he pleased ; and the decision went upon that ground. In the present case, we think the depositary was not the agent of the town, but of Graves, to receive and appropriate the amount of the check, and that the town could not control or revoke it. The check therefore was a payment of the debt due from the town to Graves.

*Trustee discharged.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Northwest Sacramento Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet on Thursday, May 18, 2000, at the Mt. Shasta Community Center, 629 Alder Street, Mt. Shasta, California. The meeting will start at 9 a.m. and adjourn at 3 p.m. Topics for the meeting are: (1) An update on the High Complex Fire; (2) update on the Clear Creek/Resource Conservation District proposal; (3) update on the Story Creek Coordinated Resource Management Plan; and (4) public comment periods. All PAC meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Connie Hendryx, USDA, Klamath National Forest, 11263 N. Highway 3, Fort Jones, California 96032; telephone 530-468-1281; TDD (530) 468-2783; email:                         *chendryx@fs.fed.us.*

Dated: May 4, 2000.

Constance J. Hendryx,

PAC Support Staff.

[FR Doc. 00-11646 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 313.7 Integration with environmental procedures. ( a ) In proceedings in which an environmental impact statement or a finding of no significant impact is prepared by a responsible official pursuant to DOT's procedures implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the energy information called for by this part may be included in that statement or declaration in order to yield a single, comprehensive document. In such instances, the DOT's NEPA procedures shall govern the submission of the energy information. However, it shall remain the responsibility of the administrative law judge or the DOT decisionmaker, as the case may be, to make the findings and conclusions required by § 313.6(a) of this part.
( b ) A determination that a major regulatory action within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. 6362 and this part may be involved in a proceeding is independent from any determination that the proceeding is a “major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment” within the meaning of NEPA, and vice versa.
[Doc. No. 82, 50 FR 2425, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended at 60 FR 43528, 43529, Aug. 22, 1995]