alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Alton
L. Boynton, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        /s/ Alton L. Boynton

                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Alton L. Boynton
                                        President (Principal Executive Officer)
                                        August 13, 2004

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      forwarded to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.

                                       35
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 8:18 AM

To: 'sales@rvrd.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Info rmation: RVRD, LLC (FAA-2014-0938)



### June 24, 2015

Dear Mr. Toth:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0938). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by July 8, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Gateway International Holdings, Inc.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Stephen Kasprisin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:November
                12,
                2008
            /s/
                Stephen KasprisinBy:
                Stephen KasprisinIts:
                Chief Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Gateway International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Gateway
      International Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Joseph R. Davies et al., Appellants, *v.*Iroquois Gas Corporation, Respondent.

(Argued October 6, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*573
      *James O. Moore, Jr., Arthur J. Block*and *Michael M. Cohn*for appellants.

*Lyman M. Bass, William P. Stewart*and *George C. Letchworth*for respondent.

Order of. Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, without costs, and question certified answered in the negative. We are of the opinion that on the facts presented the Special Term was justified ip exercising its discretion. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
#### Edwin F. Sheehan, Respondent, *v.*North Country Community Hospital, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Argued January 12, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*Richards W. Hannah*and *William A. Earl*for appellant.

*Louis G. Hart, Jr.,*for respondent.

*581Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of *Sheehan*v. *North Country Community Hospital*(273 N. Y. 163). No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Finch, J.
§ 375.1 Definitions. As used in this part: *Air transportation* means the carriage by aircraft of persons or property as a common carrier for compensation or hire or the carriage of mail by aircraft in interstate, overseas, or foreign commerce (see 49 U.S.C. 40102 (a)(5) and (a)(24));
*Category* shall indicate a classification of aircraft such as airplane, helicopter, glider, etc.;
*Commercial air operations* shall mean operations by foreign civil aircraft engaged in flights for the purpose of crop dusting, pest control, pipeline patrol, mapping, surveying, banner towing, skywriting, or similar agricultural and industrial operations performed in the United States, and any operations for remuneration or hire to, from or within the United States including air carriage involving the discharging or taking on of passengers or cargo at one or more points in the United States, including carriage of cargo for the operator's own account if the cargo is to be resold or otherwise used in the furtherance of a business other than the business of providing carriage by aircraft, but excluding operations pursuant to foreign air carrier permits issued under 49 U.S.C. 41301, exemptions, and all other operations in air transportation.
*Exemption* means an exemption granted, under 49 U.S.C. 40109, authorizing air transportation by a foreign air carrier;
*Foreign air carrier permit* means a permit authorizing foreign air transportation by a foreign air carrier pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 41301;
*Foreign aircraft permit* means a permit authorizing navigation of foreign civil aircraft in the United States pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 41703 and this part;
*Foreign civil aircraft* means ( a ) an aircraft of foreign registry that is not part of the armed forces of a foreign nation, or
( b ) a U.S.-registered aircraft owned, controlled or operated by persons who are not citizens or permanent residents of the United States;
*Stop for non-traffic purposes* means a landing for any purpose other than taking on or discharging passengers, cargo or mail, and does not include landings for embarking or disembarking stopover passengers or transshipped cargo or mail, or for other than strictly operational purposes.
*Type* means all aircraft of the same basic design including all modifications thereto except those modifications that result in a change in handling or flight characteristics.
[OST Doc. No. 42547, 51 FR 7254, Mar. 3, 1986, as amended at 71 FR 15328, Mar. 28, 2006; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019]
13356

#### COHEN v. WILLIAMS *ET AL.*

(162 S. E., 758)

*506
      *Mr. W. M.*Smoak, for appellant,

*Messrs. H. L. O’Bannon*and *T. M. Boulware,*for respondent,

February 24, 1932.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice BeEasE.

The very carefully prepared report of the special referee, Hon. E. H. Henderson, in this cause, sets forth clearly the facts and correctly disposes of the legal issues involved. The *507decree of the Circuit Judge approved the special referee’s report. Our examination of the record convinces us that the exceptions of the appellant should be overruled.

The judgment of this Court is that the decree appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Stabler, Carter and Bonham concur.

Mr. Justice Cothran did not participate on account of illness.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Jennie Albanese, as Guardian of William Albanese. William Albanese, Appellant; Walter A. Fullerton, Respondent.

(Argued October 1, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*553
      *R. Emmett Mahoney*for William Albanese, appellant.

*Walter A. Fullerton*(in person) and *Francis J. Neddo*for Walter A. Fullerton, respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs, on the ground the Surrogate’s Court had no jurisdiction in this proceeding to make the order; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs. Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4522 

To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy 

Act of 1977 to authorize appropriations for the United States-Israel 

Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 11, 2020 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, 

and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 to authorize appropriations for the United States-Israel Binational Agricultural 

Research and Development Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UNITED STATES-ISRAEL BINATIONAL AGRICUL4 TURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 

5 FUND. 

6 Section 1458(e) of the National Agricultural Re7 search, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4522 IS

1 U.S.C. 3291(e)) is amended by adding at the end the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(3) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

4 There are authorized to be appropriated to the 

5 BARD Fund such sums as are necessary to carry 

6 out activities under this subsection for each fiscal 

7 year.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Paul Jones, Respondent, against Charles A. Harnett, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

(Submitted September 28, 1936;

decided October 6, 1936.)

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 271 N. Y. 626.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Guthrie, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

to the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  April 7, 2006

/s/David Guthrie

David Guthrie

President and

Principal Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certification**

 

Each undersigned officer of Capital CrossingPreferred Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the“Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.  Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, andItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under theExchange Act.  In accordance with clause(ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification shall not be deemed (i) “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to theliability of that section or (ii) to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

 

 
| Date: August 13,  2004 | By:                                        | /s/ Richard Wayne  |   |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                        | Richard Wayne                              |
|                        | *President  (Principal Executive Officer)* |
|                        |                                       |
|                        |                                       |
| Date: August 13,  2004 | By:                                        | /s/ Edward F. Mehm |   |
|                        | Edward F. Mehm                             |
|                        | *Treasurer  (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

1

----
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0015

SAT Date: 11/1/2013

Print Date: 12/3/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG; IRR-E,S,MM,L; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-14-0012-3/5-6

FATE: Estimations for typical 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 4.21 (E) 

S = Dispersible / 6.57 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.66 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.55 (E) 
POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI 

tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for surfactant effects on the lung; irritation to 

eye, skin (chronic), mucous membranes and lung based on surfactant properties of the 

compound.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 5.1

green algal 96-h EC50 2.5

fish _ chronic value 0.873

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.534

algal _ chronic 

value

1

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Aliphatic Amines-Acids; SAR 

chemical class = Aliphatic Amines; MW 484; S = dispersible (P); liquid with unknown mp (P); 

pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 

concentrations; DW hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

53.4

SARs Aliphatic Amines-Acids

SAR Class Aliphatic Amines-Acids

Ecotox Category Aliphatic Amines

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
#### § 35.24 Strength.

The maximum stresses developed in the propeller may not exceed values acceptable to the Administrator considering the particular form of construction and the most severe operating conditions.

[Amdt. 35-8, 73 FR 63348, Oct. 24, 2008]
§ 29.1385 Position light system installation. ( a ) *General.* Each part of each position light system must meet the applicable requirements of this section and each system as a whole must meet the requirements of §§ 29.1387 through 29.1397.
( b ) *Forward position lights.* Forward position lights must consist of a red and a green light spaced laterally as far apart as practicable and installed forward on the rotorcraft so that, with the rotorcraft in the normal flying position, the red light is on the left side, and the green light is on the right side. Each light must be approved.
( c ) *Rear position light.* The rear position light must be a white light mounted as far aft as practicable, and must be approved.
( d ) *Circuit.* The two forward position lights and the rear position light must make a single circuit.
( e ) *Light covers and color filters.* Each light cover or color filter must be at least flame resistant and may not change color or shape or lose any appreciable light transmission during normal use.
#### Dorough *v.*The State.

Crime.

(Decided June 6, 1916.

72 South. 208.)

Appeal and Error; Review; Instructions. — Where the record does not contain a bill of exceptions furnishing data for review, and the oral charge of the court is not set out, the appellate court cannot review intelligently the charges refused to a defendant as required by Acts 1915, p. 815, although the record contains the charges given and refused to defendant requested in writing.

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. Wm. E. Fort.

B. B. Dorough was convicted of crime and he appeals,

Affirmed.

*111No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and H. G. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

PELHAM, P. J.

(1) The case was submitted on the record proper, which contains no bill of exceptions, and the trial judge’s certificate shown by the transcript states that the time for presenting a bill of exceptions had expired and no bill had been tendered. The record contains the given and refused charges requested in writing by the defendant, but does not contain the general oral charge of the court, as required by statute. — Acts 1915, p. 815. The court, in the absence of a' bill of exceptions and the oral charge of the court, cannot review the charges which were refused to the *defendant.*—Sis *Mitchell, alias, etc., v. State, Infra,*71 South. 982.

(2) The record proper shows an indictment in due and regular form, a verdict of guilty, and a judgment of the court in conformity with the finding of the jury. An examination of the record shows regular proceedings and nothing authorizing a reversal of the case, and an affirmance of the judgment appealed from is therefore ordered.

Affirmed.
#### §§ 415.91-415.100 [Reserved]
#### § 29.477 Landing gear arrangement.

Sections 29.235, 29.479 through 29.485, and 29.493 apply to landing gear with two wheels aft, and one or more wheels forward, of the center of gravity.
#### §§ 303.20-303.24 [Reserved]
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00279-CV

In the Interest of G.T., a Child §

§

§

§

From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-103614-16)

December 28, 2017

Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker____________________

 Justice Sue Walker
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Satellite Enterprises
Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Roy Piceni, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Dated:   April 15, 2004

                                        /s/ Roy Piceni
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Roy Piceni
                                        Chief Executive Officer
#### § 437.65 Collision avoidance analysis.

For a permitted flight with a planned maximum altitude greater than 150 kilometers, a permittee must obtain a collision avoidance analysis in accordance with § 450.169 of this chapter.

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0229, Amdt. 437-3, 85 FR 79718, Dec. 10, 2020]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Cora L. Moocheer, Respondent, against A. H. Herrick & Son et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

(Argued September 30, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*546
      *Walter D. Smith*for appellants.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Leon Freedman*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
§ 158.18 Use of PFC revenue to pay for debt service for non-eligible projects. ( a ) The FAA may authorize a public agency to impose a PFC to make payments for debt service on indebtedness incurred to carry out at the airport a project that is not eligible if the FAA determines it is necessary because of the financial need of the airport. The FAA defines financial need in § 158.3.
( b ) A public agency may request authority to impose a PFC and use PFC revenue under this section using the PFC application procedures in § 158.25. The public agency must document its financial position and explain its financial recovery plan that uses all available resources.
( c ) The FAA reviews the application using the procedures in § 158.27. The FAA will issue its decision on the public agency's request under § 158.29.
[Doc. No. FAA-2006-23730, 72 FR 28848, May 23, 2007]