alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,682,895
<SECURITIES>                                 5,434,008
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               400,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,229,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          559,170
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,669,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,229,022
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,213
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,854
<INCOME-TAX>                                   108,854
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            108,854
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   108,854
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
01/31/2012 13:52 FAX 3107256816 AWP-7

To·**~·** Company: _£hone:

F'"x: From: ;:Iitle:

Date: Descnptlon of itc;m being transmitted: ALJ Goodwin; FAA Hearing Docket Clerk, & Robert Hajek, Esq. Department ofTransportation, FAA, & Attornev at Law (202)366-7536, (202)493-5142 & (858)792-1799

. Lierre Green Attorney January 31, 2012 In the Matter of K.S. Awltlon d/b/a/ S1erra Academy ofAeronautics, Complainant's Withdrawal ofthe Compl<:lint
PER YOUR REQUEST FOR REVIEW lill 001/003 

# Federal Aviation Administration
Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7 PO Box 92007 Los. Angeles, CA 90009-2007 Telephone: (310) 725-7117 Facsimile: (310) 725-6816 Email: lierre.green@faa.go'r



### Facsimile
Total Number of pages including the cover page: 

# s

D PLEASE COMMi=ONT
IJ FOR COORDINATION X HARD COPY TO FOLLOW W/ ENCLOSURE;$ VIA US MAIL NOTES/COMMENTS:



# 0 U.S. O..partm•m• ofTranspe>rtllll<>n01/31/2012 13:52 FAX 3107256816 AWP-7



### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 141002/003



### In the Matter of K.S. Aviation, INC. d/b/a SIERRA ACADEMY OF AERONAUTICS FAA Docket No.: [To Be Assigned] 

# .• • Respondent. 

### * FAA Region: Western-Pacific 

### * 

### * Judge: Honorable Richard C. Goodwin * 

### FDMS No.: FAA-2011-0483********~****************************************** 

### MOTION TO WITHDRAW COMPLAINT 

### To: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin and Respondent and its counsel: The Regional Counsel for the Western-Pacific Region, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) through counsel, ht:reby files 

### this Motion for Withdrawal of Complaint and seeks dismissal ofthis action with prejudice. This motion is based on the fact the parties have settled this matter, and 1m 

### Order Assesssing Civil Penalty reflecting said settlementwill be issued :forthwith. Respectfully submitted,

A orne01/31/2012 13:52 FAX 3107256816 AWP-7 141003/003

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that onthis date I have faxed and placed inthe United St:!tes mail, postage prepaid, the executed original of the 

### COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW COMPLAINT, addressed 

### as follows: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Administrativ<' LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. EastBuilding Ground Floor, Room El2-320 Washington, DC 20590 Facsimile: (202)366-7536 I further certify that on this date, I have faxed and placed in the**Unit•~d** States mail, postage prepaid, a true copy

### ofthe ofthe above to:

Dated: JAN 

### 3 1 2012

JeffKam erg Legal Technician FederalAviationAdministmtion 800 IndependenceAvenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding- Suite 2Wl000 Facsimile: (202)493-5142 Robert**H~ek,** 

### Esq. 828 Stratford Court Del Mar, CA92014-2727 Facsimile: (858)792-1799

Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation. Administration Western-Pacific Region Hawthorne, California
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                     JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                             327,602
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      1,305,452
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   2,642,177
<PP&E>                             1,040,876
<DEPRECIATION>                     42,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     5,337,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,291,754
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        3,952,250
<COMMON>                           3,497,200
<OTHER-SE>                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       5,337,053
<SALES>                            334,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   334,955
<CGS>                              193,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      1,682,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 (28250)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (1,562,530)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (1,562,530)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (1,562,530)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.13)


</TABLE>
§ 33.23 Engine mounting attachments and structure. ( a ) The maximum allowable limit and ultimate loads for engine mounting attachments and related engine structure must be specified.
( b ) The engine mounting attachments and related engine structure must be able to withstand— ( 1 ) The specified limit loads without permanent deformation; and
( 2 ) The specified ultimate loads without failure, but may exhibit permanent deformation.
[Amdt. 33-10, 49 FR 6851, Feb. 23, 1984]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Robert P. May, the Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of Renaissance Media Group
LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and Renaissance Media
Capital Corporation (the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission:  
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Robert P. May
Robert P. May
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2005
#### Bowery Savings Bank, Respondent, *v.*Mel *&*Sons, Inc., Appellant, Impleaded with Others. Barnett J. Nova, as Receiver, Respondent.

Submitted March 5, 1937;

decided April 20, 1937.

*672
      *George Ziriberg*and *Selig Kaplan*for appellant.

*John A. Sullivan, DeCoursey Fales*and *Robert E. Lee*for plaintiff, respondent.

*E. Ivan Rubenstein*for receiver, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Lohghran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
EPA- HQ - OW -2014-0598-DRAFT-08 22 SGE0 10 16 .A0 4 Insert page File sent on CD
Order entered December 4, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00770-CR

No. 05-14-00771-CR

STEVEN DWAYNE FERRELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-72590-L, F14-54495-L

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On October 29, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

clerk’s and reporter’s records have not been filed. On November 24, 2014, appellant filed 

motions to dismiss the appeals. Therefore, we conclude findings are no longer necessary and 

VACATE the October 29, 2014 order requiring findings. The motions to dismiss will be 

disposed of in due course.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-492-CV

MARVIN LEE EDWARDS AND				       	      APPELLANTS

ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS	

	V.

AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On January 8, 2009, we notified Marvin Lee Edwards that his notice of appeal was defective and that he had not paid the filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 25.1(d), (e).  We directed him to file an amended notice of appeal and to pay the filing fee by Monday, January 19, 2009.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 25.1(f), 37.1.  We received no response.  On January 21, 2009, we again notified Edwards that his notice of appeal was defective and that he had not paid the filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 25.1(d), (e).  We directed Edwards to file an amended notice of appeal and to pay the filing fee by Monday, February 2, 2009, and further stated that the appeal “will be DISMISSED” if the filing fee was not paid by that date.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

	Because Edwards has failed to comply, it is the opinion of the court that his appeal should be dismissed.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See id.

	Edwards shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  February 26, 2009
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Sally J. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.



Date: February 27, 2009



/s/SALLYJ.SMITHSally J. Smith, Chief Executive Officer






---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEEMIC HOLDINGS
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           164,452
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    2,300
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 173,833
<CASH>                                           7,551
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               2,726
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 294,681
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                104,761
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             35,881
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  1,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,295
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   294,681
<PREMIUMS>                                      57,690
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              5,051
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                (15)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     920
<BENEFITS>                                      38,329
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            12,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,980
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,365
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,615
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,615
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  46,563
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             42,510
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (4,179)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              23,590
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                10,793
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 50,511
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
§ 61.47 Status of an examiner who is authorized by the Administrator to conduct practical tests. ( a ) An examiner represents the Administrator for the purpose of conducting practical tests for certificates and ratings issued under this part and to observe an applicant's ability to perform the areas of operation on the practical test.
( b ) The examiner is not the pilot in command of the aircraft during the practical test unless the examiner agrees to act in that capacity for the flight or for a portion of the flight by prior arrangement with: ( 1 ) The applicant; or
( 2 ) A person who would otherwise act as pilot in command of the flight or for a portion of the flight.
( c ) Notwithstanding the type of aircraft used during the practical test, the applicant and the examiner (and any other occupants authorized to be on board by the examiner) are not subject to the requirements or limitations for the carriage of passengers that are specified in this chapter.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 61-103, 62 FR 40897, July 30, 1997]
#### JOHN A. BROWN CO. et al. v. OKLAHOMA CITY GENERAL HOSPITAL.

No. 29278.

May 7, 1940.

*102 P. 2d 860.*

Jarman, Brown, Looney & Watts, of Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error.

Lee B. Thompson, of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to cause No. 29277, 187 Okla. 255, 102 P. 2d 858, this day decided, and involves the same questions of fact and of law as were presented and discussed therein and what was therein said disposes of the matters here involved. The judgment as to John A. Brown Company is affirmed and as to Standard Accident Insurance Company is reversed and remanded, with directions to enter judgment in favor of said defendant.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part, with directions.

BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, and HURST, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4599 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4599

  To withdraw certain Federal land in the Pecos Watershed area of the 
    State of New Mexico from mineral entry, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2020

 Mr. Heinrich introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To withdraw certain Federal land in the Pecos Watershed area of the 
    State of New Mexico from mineral entry, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pecos Watershed Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LAND IN PECOS WATERSHED AREA, NEW MEXICO.

    (a) Definition of Federal Land.--In this section, the term 
``Federal land'' means the Federal land depicted as ``Pecos 
Withdrawal'' on the map entitled ``Pecos Watershed, upstream of I-25 
Mineral Withdrawal'' and dated September 1, 2020.
    (b) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid rights in existence on the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Federal land is withdrawn from all forms 
of--
            (1) entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land 
        laws;
            (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
            (3) disposition under all laws pertaining to mineral and 
        geothermal leasing or mineral materials.
                                 <all>
```
§ 23.2210 Structural design loads. ( a ) The applicant must: ( 1 ) Determine the applicable structural design loads resulting from likely externally or internally applied pressures, forces, or moments that may occur in flight, ground and water operations, ground and water handling, and while the airplane is parked or moored.
( 2 ) Determine the loads required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section at all critical combinations of parameters, on and within the boundaries of the structural design envelope.
( b ) The magnitude and distribution of the applicable structural design loads required by this section must be based on physical principles.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00653

- CR

Nicholas A. BALDERAMA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 11, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 252539

Honorable Carlo Key, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 18, 2013.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
#### O’HARA *v.*BERRIEN CIRCUIT JUDGE.

Mandamus — Compensation of Prosecuting Attorney — Divorce Case — Certificate.

Upon an investigation made by tbe prosecuting attorney relative to tbe status of a minor child in a divorce case and tbe filing of a written report witb tbe clerk, be became entitled to a fee of $5, under Act No. 284, Pub. Acts 1909 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 11433), and bis right to tbe statutory fee will be enforced by mandamus to compel tbe circuit judge to issue a certificate to tbe county treasurer.

Mandamus by Chester P. O’Hara, Prosecuting Attorney of Berrien county, to compel George W. Bridgman, circuit judge of said county, to issue a certificate for services performed under section 11433, 3 Comp. Laws 1915.

Submitted June 20, 1916.

(Calendar No. 27,274.)

Writ granted July 21, 1916.

*Chester P. O’Hara, in pro. per.*

Moore, J.

The relator, who is prosecuting attorney, was served with a subpoena in a divorce case where there was a minor child. He investigated the case and filed a written report with the clerk of the court. He made an affidavit of what he had done, and applied to the circuit judge for a certificate to the county treasurer that the services had been performed by relator, and that relator was entitled to $5 therefor. The circuit judge declined to give relator such a certificate.

This is an application for mandamus to the circuit judge to require him to execute said certificate. The statutes involved are section 8657, 3 Comp. Laws, as amended by Act No. 315, Pub. Acts 1907, and Act No. 284, Pub. Acts 1909 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 11433). We think the circuit judge overlooked the last-named *460act, as it clearly entitles the relator to his certificate under the showing made.

The writ of mandamus will issue as prayed, but without costs.

Stone, C. J., and Kuhn, Ostrander, Bird, Steere, Brooke, and Person, JJ., concurred.
§ 61.41 Flight training received from flight instructors not certificated by the FAA. ( a ) A person may credit flight training toward the requirements of a pilot certificate or rating issued under this part, if that person received the training from: ( 1 ) A flight instructor of an Armed Force in a program for training military pilots of either— ( i ) The United States; or
( ii ) A foreign contracting State to the Convention on International Civil Aviation.
( 2 ) A flight instructor who is authorized to give such training by the licensing authority of a foreign contracting State to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, and the flight training is given outside the United States.
( b ) A flight instructor described in paragraph (a) of this section is only authorized to give endorsements to show training given.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Eric S. Yonenson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of Critical Home Care, Inc. (the
"Company"),  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a)  the Periodic Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
          December 31, 2003, which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic
          Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  the information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,  in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.

          Dated: March 9, 2004

                                                         /s/ Eric S. Yonenson
                                                         -------------------
                                                         Eric S. Yonenson
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Critical  Home Care,  Inc.,  and will be retained by Critical  Home
Care, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.
§ 29.1399 Riding light. ( a ) Each riding light required for water operation must be installed so that it can— ( 1 ) Show a white light for at least two miles at night under clear atmospheric conditions; and
( 2 ) Show a maximum practicable unbroken light with the rotorcraft on the water.
( b ) Externally hung lights may be used.