alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 417.115 Tests. ( a ) *General.* All flight, communication, and ground systems and equipment that a launch operator uses to protect the public from any adverse effects of a launch, must undergo testing as required by this part, and any corrective action and re-testing necessary to ensure reliable operation. A launch operator must— ( 1 ) Coordinate test plans and all associated test procedures with any launch site operator or local authorities, as required by local agreements, associated with the operation; and
( 2 ) Make test results, test failure reports, information on any corrective actions implemented and the results of re-test available to the FAA upon request.
( b ) *Flight safety system testing.* A launch operator must only use a flight safety system and all flight safety system components, including any onboard launch vehicle flight termination system, command control system, and support system that satisfy the test requirements of subpart D of this part.
( c ) *Ground system testing.* A launch operator must only use a system or equipment used to support hazardous ground operations identified by the ground safety analysis required by § 417.405 that satisfies the test requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                                
                            THE CENTRIS GROUP, INC.
                                        
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                        
     The computation of per share income is based upon the weighted average
number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during each of the
quarters and nine-month periods ended September 30 as follows:

                             (Dollars in Thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Quarter Ended          Nine Months Ended
                                                     September 30             September 30
                                               ------------------------  ----------------------
                                                  1998         1997         1998        1997
                                               -----------  -----------  ----------  ----------
 
<S>                                            <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>
Net Income                                        $(1,184)      $ 4,026     $ 7,551     $11,434
                                                  =======       =======     =======     =======
 
Weighted average shares outstanding during
 the period (Basic Shares)                         12,111        11,980      12,165      11,944
 
 
Common stock equivalent shares                        ---           292         281         252
                                                  -------       -------     -------     -------
 
Common and common stock equivalent shares
 outstanding for purposes of calculating
 diluted income per share                          12,111        12,272      12,446      12,196
 
 
 
Basic income per share                            $ (0.10)      $  0.33     $  0.62     $  0.96
                                                  -------       -------     -------     -------
 
Diluted income per share                          $ (0.10)      $  0.33     $  0.61     $  0.94
                                                  -------       =======     =======     =======
</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02197**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** 

### 02197\02197_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 02197\02197_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 02197\02197_Checklist_102610_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 

### 02197\02197_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02197\02197_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02197\02197_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 02197\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\Spencer 02197 EPA Part A Section 5 A5-2 Spencer Plant Prope.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02197\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\Spencer 02197 EPA Part A Section 5 A5-3 Spencer Water Balan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 3 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
§ 129.111 Electrical wiring interconnection systems (EWIS) maintenance program. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, this section applies to transport category, turbine-powered airplanes with a type certificate issued after January 1, 1958, that, as a result of original type certification or later increase in capacity, have— ( 1 ) A maximum type-certificated passenger capacity of 30 or more, or
( 2 ) A maximum payload capacity of 7500 pounds or more.
( b ) After March 10, 2011, no foreign person or foreign air carrier may operate a U.S.-registered airplane identified in paragraph (a) of this section unless the maintenance program for that airplane includes inspections and procedures for EWIS.
( c ) The proposed EWIS maintenance program changes must be based on EWIS Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) that have been developed in accordance with the provisions of Appendix H of part 25 of this chapter applicable to each affected airplane (including those ICA developed for supplemental type certificates installed on each airplane) and that have been approved by the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office. ( 1 ) For airplanes subject to § 26.11 of this chapter, the EWIS ICA must comply with paragraphs H25.5(a)(1) and (b).
( 2 ) For airplanes subject to § 25.1729 of this chapter, the EWIS ICA must comply with paragraph H25.4 and all of paragraph H25.5.
( d ) After March 10, 2011, before returning a U.S.-registered airplane to service after any alterations for which EWIS ICA are developed, the foreign person or foreign air carrier must include in the maintenance program for that airplane inspections and procedures for EWIS based on those ICA.
( e ) The EWIS maintenance program changes identified in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section and any later EWIS revisions must be submitted to the Principal Inspector or Flight Standards office responsible for review and approval.
( f ) This section does not apply to the following airplane models: ( 1 ) Lockheed L-188
( 2 ) Bombardier CL-44
( 3 ) Mitsubishi YS-11
( 4 ) British Aerospace BAC 1-11
( 5 ) Concorde
( 6 ) deHavilland D.H. 106 Comet 4C
( 7 ) VFW-Vereinigte Flugtechnische Werk VFW-614
( 8 ) Illyushin Aviation IL 96T
( 9 ) Bristol Aircraft Britannia 305
( 10 ) Handley Page Herald Type 300
( 11 ) Avions Marcel Dassault—Breguet Aviation Mercure 100C
( 12 ) Airbus Caravelle
( 13 ) Lockheed L-300
[Amdt. 129-43, 72 FR 63413, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 129-53, 83 FR 9174, Mar. 5, 2018]
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.140 Method of giving concurrence. ( a ) A concurrence prepared in a manner acceptable to the Office of International Aviation shall be used by a carrier to give authority to another carrier to issue and file with the Department tariffs which contain joint fares or charges, including provisions governing such fares or charges, applying to, from, or via points served by the carrier giving the concurrence. A concurrence shall not be used as authority to file joint fares or charges in which the carrier to whom the concurrence is given does not participate, and it shall not be used as authority to file local fares or charges.
( b ) *Number of copies.* Each concurrence shall be prepared in triplicate. The original of each concurrence shall be filed with the Department, the duplicate thereof shall be given to the carrier in whose favor the concurrence is issued, and the third copy shall be retained by the carrier who issued the concurrence.
( c ) *Conflicting authority to be avoided.* Care should be taken to avoid giving authority to two or more carriers which, if used, would result in conflicting or duplicate tariff provisions.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4653 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 551
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4653

  To protect the healthcare of hundreds of millions of people of the 
   United States and prevent efforts of the Department of Justice to 
 advocate courts to strike down the Patient Protection and Affordable 
                               Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2020

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read the first 
                                  time

                           September 23, 2020

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To protect the healthcare of hundreds of millions of people of the 
   United States and prevent efforts of the Department of Justice to 
 advocate courts to strike down the Patient Protection and Affordable 
                               Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING DOJ EFFORTS TO ADVOCATE COURTS TO STRIKE DOWN 
              PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.

    The Department of Justice may not in any case, including in 
California v. Texas, No. 19-840 (U.S. cert. granted Mar. 2, 2020), 
advocate that a court invalidate any provision of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148; 124 Stat. 119) 
or any amendment made by that Act.
                                                       Calendar No. 551

116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4653

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To protect the healthcare of hundreds of millions of people of the 
   United States and prevent efforts of the Department of Justice to 
 advocate courts to strike down the Patient Protection and Affordable 
                               Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 23, 2020

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
### FI LED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Octob er 2 0, 2005 THO MAS K. KAH N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 05- 1142 9

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 03-00287 -CR- A- N UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Plaintiff-Appellee, ve rs us HENRY LEE GORDON, JR., D ef en da nt- A ppe lla nt.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ A ppe al f ro m the U nit ed

S ta te s D ist ri ct

Co ur t f or the M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f

A l a b a ma

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (O ct ob er 20, 200 5) Before BIRC H, BA RKE TT and FA Y, Circuit Judges PE R CU RIA M:2

Ja y L ew is, appoi nte d c ouns el f or H en ry L ee G or don, Jr . , ha s f

ile d am oti on t o withdraw on appeal s uppo rted b y a b rief prepared pu rsuant to Anders v. California, 386 U . S. 738 , 87 S . Ct . 139 6, 18 L . E d. 2d 4 93 ( 1967 ). O ur ind ep en de nt re vie w of

the re co rd r ev ea ls t ha t c ouns el ’ s a sse ssm en t of the r el at ive m er it of

the ap pe al is c or

re ct . Be ca use ind ep en de nt e xa m ina tio n of the e nti re r ec or d r ev ea ls no a rg uable iss ue s of m er it, co unse l’ s m oti on t o w ith dr awis GRA NTE D , an d Gor don’ s c onvi ct ion s a nd sentences are AFFIRMED.
§ 61.301 What is the purpose of this subpart and to whom does it apply? ( a ) This subpart prescribes the following requirements that apply to a sport pilot certificate: ( 1 ) Eligibility.
( 2 ) Aeronautical knowledge.
( 3 ) Flight proficiency.
( 4 ) Aeronautical experience.
( 5 ) Endorsements.
( 6 ) Privileges and limits.
( b ) Other provisions of this part apply to the logging of flight time and testing.
( c ) This subpart applies to applicants for, and holders of, sport pilot certificates. It also applies to holders of recreational pilot certificates and higher, as provided in § 61.303.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-11133, 69 FR 44869, July 27, 2004, as amended by Amdt. 61-125, 75 FR 5221, Feb. 1, 2010]
§ 125.263 Composition of flightcrew. ( a ) No certificate holder may operate an airplane with less than the minimum flightcrew specified in the type certificate and the Airplane Flight Manual approved for that type airplane and required by this part for the kind of operation being conducted.
( b ) In any case in which this part requires the performance of two or more functions for which an airman certificate is necessary, that requirement is not satisfied by the performance of multiple functions at the same time by one airman.
( c ) On each flight requiring a flight engineer, at least one flight crewmember, other than the flight engineer, must be qualified to provide emergency performance of the flight engineer's functions for the safe completion of the flight if the flight engineer becomes ill or is otherwise incapacitated. A pilot need not hold a flight engineer's certificate to perform the flight engineer's functions in such a situation.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10602]



[[Page 24982]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; Commercenet Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 2, 1999, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), CommerceNet Consortium, 
Inc. (the ``Consortium'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Connectinc.com, 
Mountain View, CA; Cohera Corporation, Hayward, CA; EPRICSG, Palo Alto, 
CA; and bTrade.com, Dallas, TX have joined the Consortium as Core 
members. Ocwen Technology Xchange, West Palm Beach, FL; and 
Inforonics.com, Littleton, MA have joined the Consortium as Portfolio 
members. Also, Inference Corporation, Novato, CA has been dropped as a 
party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CommerceNet Consortium, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On June 13, 1994, CommerceNet Consortium, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on August 31, 1994 (59 FR 45012).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 14, 
1999. A notice has not yet been published in the Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-10602 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4268 

To improve coordination between the paycheck protection program and 

employee retention tax credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2020 

Ms. HASSAN (for herself and Mr. BURR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To improve coordination between the paycheck protection 

program and employee retention tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employer Assistance 

5 Coordination Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVED COORDINATION BETWEEN PAYCHECK 

7 PROTECTION PROGRAM AND EMPLOYEE RE8 TENTION TAX CREDIT. 

9 (a) AMENDMENT TO PAYCHECK PROTECTION PRO10 GRAM.—Section 1106(a)(8) of the CARES Act (Public 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4268 IS

1 Law 116–136) is amended by inserting ‘‘, except that such 

2 costs shall not include qualified wages taken into account 

3 in determining the credit allowed under section 2301 of 

4 this Act’’ before the period at the end. 

5 (b) AMENDMENTS TO EMPLOYEE RETENTION TAX

6 CREDIT.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 2301(g) of the 

8 CARES Act (Public Law 116–136) is amended to 

9 read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(g) ELECTION TO NOT TAKE CERTAIN WAGES

11 INTO ACCOUNT.— 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—This section shall not apply 

13 to qualified wages paid by an eligible employer with 

14 respect to which such employer makes an election 

15 (at such time and in such manner as the Secretary 

16 may prescribe) to have this section not apply to such 

17 wages. 

18 ‘‘(2) COORDINATION WITH PAYCHECK PROTEC19 TION PROGRAM.—The Secretary, in consultation 

20 with the Administrator of the Small Business Ad21 ministration, shall issue guidance providing that 

22 payroll costs paid or incurred during the covered pe23 riod shall not fail to be treated as qualified wages 

24 under this section by reason of an election under 

25 paragraph (1) to the extent that a covered loan of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4268 IS

1 the eligible employer is not forgiven by reason of a 

2 decision under section 1106(g). Terms used in the 

3 preceding sentence which are also used in section 

4 1106 shall have the same meaning as when used in 

5 such section.’’. 

6 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

7 (A) Section 2301 of the CARES Act (Pub8 lic Law 116–136) is amended by striking sub9 section (j). 

10 (B) Section 2301(l) of the CARES Act 

11 (Public Law 116–136) is amended by striking 

12 paragraph (3) and by redesignating paragraphs 

13 (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respec14 tively. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall take effect as if included in the provisions 

17 of the CARES Act (Public Law 116–136) to which they 

18 relate. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors

Actuate Corporation:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113545, 333-104101, 333-84582, 333-62600,
333-56906, 333-33720, 333-73015, and 333-59959) and in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-67220 and 333-34410) of Actuate Corporation of our report dated March 19, 2007, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Actuate Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2006, and the related financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in this December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Actuate Corporation.



As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment, applying the modified-prospective method.



Our report dated March 19, 2007, on managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, expresses our opinion that Actuate Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, because of the
effect of a material weakness on the achievement of objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states that:



| |  |  | The Company lacked adequate resources with sufficient technical expertise to properly account for income taxes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Company lacked effective policies and procedures to ensure that the review of schedules supporting its income tax provision was conducted in sufficient detail
by someone other than the preparer of such schedules.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ KPMG LLP



Mountain View, California

March 19, 2007
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE 

OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* Misc. Docket AG No. 92

CHARLES JOHN NABIT * September Term, 2020

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of 

Maryland and the Respondent, Charles John Nabit, to disbar the Respondent from the 

practice of law, it is this 12th day of May, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Charles John 

Nabit, be, and hereby is, disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for 

violation of Rules 8.4(a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional 

Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Charles John Nabit

from the register of attorneys in this Court, and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client 

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in 

accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

 /s/ Robert N. McDonald

 Senior Judge