Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 16, 2011 / Notices 71027 

interpreting the rule in substantially 

similar format as proposed as it applies 

to Petitioner. Pursuant to the proposed 

settlement agreement, EPA would be 

issuing its letter interpreting the rule as 

it applies to petitioner with respect to 

monitoring and measurements at three 

locations at the effluent treatment basin 

at International Paper Company’s 

Prattville Mill in Prattville, Alabama. 

For a period of thirty (30) days 

following the date of publication of this 

notice, the Agency will accept written 

comments relating to the proposed 

settlement agreement from persons who 

were not named as parties or 

intervenors to the litigation in question. 

EPA or the Department of Justice may 

withdraw or withhold consent to the 

proposed settlement agreement if the 

comments disclose facts or 

considerations that indicate that such 

consent is inappropriate, improper, 

inadequate, or inconsistent with the 

requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or 

the Department of Justice determines, 

based on any comment submitted, that 

consent to this settlement agreement 

should be withdrawn, the terms of the 

agreement will be affirmed. 

II. Additional Information About 

Commenting on the Proposed 

Settlement Agreement 

A. How can I get a copy of the 

settlement agreement? 

The official public docket for this 

action (identified by Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OGC–2011–0904) contains a 

copy of the proposed settlement 

agreement. The official public docket is 

available for public viewing at the 

Office of Environmental Information 

(OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center, 

EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC. The EPA Docket Center Public 

Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The telephone 

number for the Public Reading Room is 

(202) 566–1744, and the telephone 

number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566– 

1752. 

An electronic version of the public 

docket is available through http:// 

www.regulations.gov. You may use the 

http://www.regulations.gov to submit or 

view public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the official 

public docket, and to access those 

documents in the public docket that are 

available electronically. Once in the 

system, key in the appropriate docket 

identification number then select 

‘‘search’’. 

It is important to note that EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov without change, 

unless the comment contains 

copyrighted material, CBI, or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information 

claimed as CBI and other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute 

is not included in the official public 

docket or in the electronic public 

docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted 

material, including copyrighted material 

contained in a public comment, will not 

be placed in EPA’s electronic public 

docket but will be available only in 

printed, paper form in the official public 

docket. Although not all docket 

materials may be available 

electronically, you may still access any 

of the publicly available docket 

materials through the EPA Docket 

Center. 

B. How and to whom do I submit 

comments? 

You may submit comments as 

provided in the ADDRESSES section. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and an email 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. This 

ensures that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment that 

is placed in the official public docket, 

and made available in EPA’s electronic 

public docket. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. 

Use of the http://www.regulations.gov 

Web site to submit comments to EPA 

electronically is EPA’s preferred method 

for receiving comments. The electronic 

public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, which means EPA will 

not know your identity, email address, 

or other contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

In contrast to EPA’s electronic public 

docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email) 

system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system. If you send an email comment 

directly to the Docket without going 

through http://www.regulations.gov, 

your email address is automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the official 

public docket, and made available in 

EPA’s electronic public docket. 

Dated: November 8, 2011. 

Kevin McLean, 

Acting Associate General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2011–29648 Filed 11–15–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9492–6] 

Proposed Settlement Agreements, 

Clean Air Act Citizen Suit 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Settlement 

Agreements; Request for Public 

Comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended 

(‘‘CAA’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is 

hereby given of two proposed settlement 

agreements to resolve two cases filed by 

the WildEarth Guardians (‘‘Guardians’’) 

involving EPA actions under the CAA 

Title V operating permit program. On 

November 17, 2010, Guardians filed a 

petition with the Environmental 

Appeals Board (‘‘EAB’’) challenging a 

Title V Renewal Permit issued by EPA 

Region 8 on October 18, 2010 to BP 

America Production Company (‘‘BP’’) 

for its Florida River Compression 

Station Facility (In re BP America 

Production Co., Florida River 

Compression Facility, Appeal No. CAA 

10–04). On April 25, 2011, Guardians 

also filed a petition in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 

(WildEarth Guardians v. EPA, No. 11– 

9527) challenging the Administrator’s 

February 2, 2011 order denying an 

administrative petition to object to a 

July 14, 2010 response of the Colorado 

Department of Public Health and 

Environment, Air Pollution Control 

Division regarding the issuance of a 

renewed title V permit for Anadarko 

Petroleum Corporation’s Frederick 

Compressor Station. Under the 

proposed settlement agreements, EPA 

would agree to undertake a pilot 

program for the purpose of studying, 

improving, and streamlining source 

determinations in the oil and gas 

industry in new or renewal Title V 

permits for which Region 8 is the initial 

Part 71 permitting authority. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

71028 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 16, 2011 / Notices 

DATES: Written comments on the 

proposed settlement agreements must be 

received by December 16, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID number EPA– 

HQ–OGC–2011–0915 online at http://

www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred 

method); by email to oei.docket@epa.

gov; by mail to EPA Docket Center, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; 

or by hand delivery or courier to EPA 

Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 

4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. Comments on 

a disk or CD–ROM should be formatted 

in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use 

of special characters and any form of 

encryption, and may be mailed to the 

mailing address above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara 

L. Laumann, Office of Regional Counsel, 

EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, 

Denver, CO 80202–2466; telephone: 

(303) 312–6443; fax number: (303) 312– 

6859; email address: laumann.sara@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Additional Information About the 

Proposed Settlement Agreements 

These proposed settlement 

agreements would resolve two cases 

filed by Guardians. First, Guardians 

filed a case in the EAB challenging a 

Title V Renewal Permit issued by EPA 

Region 8 on October 18, 2010 to BP’s 

Florida River Compression Station 

Facility (In re BP America Production 

Co., Florida River Compression Facility, 

Appeal No. CAA 10–04). BP intervened 

as a party in the EAB action. Second, 

Guardians filed a petition in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Tenth 

Circuit challenging the Administrator’s 

February 2, 2011 order denying an 

administrative petition to object to a 

July 14, 2010 response of the Colorado 

Department of Public Health and 

Environment regarding the issuance of a 

renewed title V permit for Anadarko 

Petroleum Corporation’s Frederick 

Compressor Station. The State of 

Colorado and Kerr-McGee Gathering 

LLC intervened as parties in the 10th 

Circuit action. Under the proposed 

settlement agreements, EPA would agree 

to undertake a pilot program for the 

purpose of studying, improving, and 

streamlining source determinations in 

the oil and gas industry in new or 

renewal Title V permits for which 

Region 8 is the initial Part 71 permitting 

authority. The pilot program would 

begin upon the effective date of the 

settlement agreement in the EAB case 

and would continue for a duration equal 

to the earlier of two years or six Title V 

new or renewal permit applications for 

which Region 8 is the initial Part 71 

permitting authority. Additional 

information regarding the Region 8 pilot 

program can be found in an attachment 

to the proposed settlement agreement 

for the EAB action, which is available in 

the docket for this action. Under the 

proposed settlement agreements, within 

15 days of a fully executed settlement 

agreement in the EAB action, Guardians 

will file a motion with the EAB to 

dismiss with prejudice its pending 

petition for review in Appeal No. CAA 

10–04 and the parties in the Tenth 

Circuit case will file an appropriate 

pleading for the dismissal of Guardians’ 

petition for review with prejudice. All 

parties will bear their own costs and 

attorneys’ fees. 

For a period of thirty (30) days 

following the date of publication of this 

notice, the Agency will accept written 

comments relating to the proposed 

settlement agreements from persons 

who were not named as parties or 

intervenors to the respective actions at 

issue. EPA or the Department of Justice 

may withdraw or withhold consent to 

the proposed settlements agreements if 

the comments disclose facts or 

considerations that indicate that such 

consent is inappropriate, improper, 

inadequate, or inconsistent with the 

requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or 

the Department of Justice determines 

that consent to these settlements 

agreements should be withdrawn, the 

terms of the settlements agreements will 

be affirmed. 

II. Additional Information About 

Commenting on the Proposed 

Settlement Agreements 

A. How can I get a copy of the proposed 

settlement agreements? 

The official public docket for this 

action (identified by Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OGC–2011–0915) contains a 

copy of the proposed settlement 

agreements. The official public docket is 

available for public viewing at the 

Office of Environmental Information 

(OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center, 

EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC. The EPA Docket Center Public 

Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The telephone 

number for the Public Reading Room is 

(202) 566–1744, and the telephone 

number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566– 

1752. 

An electronic version of the public 

docket is available through http://www.

regulations.gov. You may use the 

http://www.regulations.gov to submit or 

view public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the official 

public docket, and to access those 

documents in the public docket that are 

available electronically. Once in the 

system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in the 

appropriate docket identification 

number. 

It is important to note that EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing online at http://www.

regulations.gov without change, unless 

the comment contains copyrighted 

material, CBI, or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Information claimed as CBI and other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute is not included in 

the official public docket or in the 

electronic public docket. EPA’s policy is 

that copyrighted material, including 

copyrighted material contained in a 

public comment, will not be placed in 

EPA’s electronic public docket but will 

be available only in printed, paper form 

in the official public docket. Although 

not all docket materials may be 

available electronically, you may still 

access any of the publicly available 

docket materials through the EPA 

Docket Center. 

B. How and to whom do I submit 

comments? 

You may submit comments as 

provided in the ADDRESSES section. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and an email 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD-ROM you submit. This 

ensures that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment that 

is placed in the official public docket, 

and made available in EPA’s electronic 

public docket. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 16, 2011 / Notices 71029 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. 

Use of the http://www.regulations.gov 

Web site to submit comments to EPA 

electronically is EPA’s preferred method 

for receiving comments. The electronic 

public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, which means EPA will 

not know your identity, email address, 

or other contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

In contrast to EPA’s electronic public 

docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email) 

system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system. If you send an email comment 

directly to the Docket without going 

through http://www.regulations.gov, 

your email address is automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the official 

public docket, and made available in 

EPA’s electronic public docket. 

Dated: November 4, 2011. 

Kevin McLean, 

Acting Associate General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2011–29644 Filed 11–15–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9492–5; Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–ORD– 

2011–0671] 

Draft Toxicological Review of nButanol: In Support of Summary 

Information on the Integrated Risk 

Information System (IRIS) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of public comment 

period; extension. 

SUMMARY: EPA announced a 60-day 

public comment period on August 31, 

2011 (76 FR 54227) for the external 

review draft human health assessment 

titled, ‘‘Toxicological Review of nButanol: In Support of Summary 

Information on the Integrated Risk 

Information System (IRIS)’’ (EPA/635/ 

R–11/081A). On September 15, 2011, 

the public comment period was 

extended by one week because of a oneweek delay in the release of the 

Toxicological Review to the public (76 

FR 57033). In this Notice, EPA is 

extending the public comment period 

an additional 30 days to December 7, 

2011, at the request of the American 

Chemistry Council’s Oxo Process Panel. 

The draft assessment was prepared by 

the National Center for Environmental 

Assessment (NCEA) within the EPA 

Office of Research and Development 

(ORD). EPA is releasing this draft 

assessment for the purposes of public 

comment and peer review. This draft 

assessment is not final as described in 

EPA’s information quality guidelines, 

and it does not represent and should not 

be construed to represent Agency policy 

or views. After public review and 

comment, an EPA contractor will 

convene an expert panel for 

independent external peer review of this 

draft assessment. The public comment 

period and external peer review meeting 

are separate processes that provide 

opportunities for all interested parties to 

comment on the assessment. The 

external peer review meeting will be 

scheduled at a later date and announced 

in the Federal Register. Public 

comments submitted during the public 

comment period will be provided to the 

external peer reviewers before the panel 

meeting and considered by EPA. Public 

comments received after the public 

comment period closes will not be 

submitted to the external peer reviewers 

and will only be considered by EPA if 

time permits. 

DATES: The public comment period will 

be extended to end December 7, 2011. 

Comments should be in writing and 

must be received by EPA by December 

7, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: The draft ‘‘Toxicological 

Review of n-Butanol: In Support of 

Summary Information on the Integrated 

Risk Information System (IRIS)’’ is 

available primarily via the Internet on 

the NCEA home page under the Recent 

Additions and Publications menus at 

http://www.epa.gov/ncea. A limited 

number of paper copies are available 

from the Information Management Team 

(Address: Information Management 

Team, National Center for 

Environmental Assessment (Mail Code: 

8601P), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone: 

(703) 347–8561; facsimile: (703) 347– 

8691). If you request a paper copy, 

please provide your name, mailing 

address, and the draft assessment title. 

Comments may be submitted 

electronically via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, by email, by mail, 

by facsimile, or by hand delivery/ 

courier. Please follow the detailed 

instructions provided in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

the August 31, 2011, Notice (76 FR 

54227). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 

information on the docket, 

www.regulations.gov, or the public 

comment period, please contact the 

Office of Environmental Information 

(OEI) Docket (Mail Code: 28221T), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone: (202) 566–1752; 

facsimile: (202) 566–9744; or email: 

ORD.Docket@epa.gov. 

For information on the draft 

assessment, please contact Dr. Ambuja 

Bale, National Center for Environmental 

Assessment (8601P), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone: (703) 347–8643; 

facsimile: (703) 347–8689; or email: 

FRN_Questions@epa.gov. 

Dated: November 9, 2011. 

Darrell A. Winner, 

Acting Director, National Center for 

Environmental Assessment. 

[FR Doc. 2011–29650 Filed 11–15–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION 

Coordination of Functions; 

Memorandum of Understanding 

AGENCY: Equal Employment 

Opportunity Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Equal Employment 

Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and 

the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), 

Office of Federal Contract Compliance 

Programs (OFCCP) have updated their 

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), 

last published at 64 FR.17,664 (April 12, 

1999). These updates include: using 

contemporary office names and titles; 

designating a ‘‘Coordination Advocate’’ 

at both agencies; reorganizing and/or 

condensing language for clarity; 

streamlining the Compliance 

Coordination Committees; and 

clarifying the complaint/charge referral 

procedures. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Claudia Gordon, Special Assistant to the 

Director, Office of Federal Contract 

Compliance Programs, Department of 

Labor, (202) 693–1073; Tanisha R. 

Wilburn, Senior Attorney Advisor, 

Office of Legal Counsel, Equal 

Employment Opportunity Commission, 

(202) 663–4909 (voice), (202) 663–7026 

(TTY). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

purpose of this Memorandum of 

Understanding (MOU) is to further the 

agencies’ joint objectives in ensuring 

equal employment opportunities for 

applicants and employees under Title 

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title 

VII) and Executive Order 11246 (E.O. 

11246), to promote greater efficiency 

and coordination, and to eliminate 

conflict and duplication of effort. The 

agencies first entered into this MOU on 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES