### 40914 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2012 / Notices

worksheet can also be reviewed at the Web site.

Number of Awards: One. NIC Opportunity Number: 12CS04. This number should appear as a reference line in the cover letter, where indicated on Standard Form 424, and outside of the envelope in which the application is sent.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 16.603.

Executive Order 12372: This program is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372.

E.O. 12372 allows states the option of setting up a system for reviewing applications from within their states for assistance under certain federal programs. Applicants (other than federally recognized Indian tribal governments) should contact their state Single Point of Contact (SPOC), a list of which is available at http:// www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants

_ spoc. Christopher Innes, Acting Director, National Institute of Corrections.
[FR Doc. 2012–16925 Filed 7–10–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4410–36–P**

**NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES** 

**Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities.

**ACTION :**  Notice of meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given that the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities will hold a meeting of the Arts and Artifacts Domestic Indemnity Panel. The purpose of the meeting is for panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation of applications for Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities for exhibitions beginning after October 1, 2012.

**DATES :**  The meeting will be held on Monday, August 6, 2012, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will be held at the Old Post Office Building, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20506, in Room 730.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Lisette Voyatzis, Committee Management Officer, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room 529, Washington, DC 20506, or call (202) 606–8322. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter may be obtained by contacting the National Endowment for the Humanities’ TDD terminal at (202) 606–
8282.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Because the meeting will consider proprietary financial and commercial data provided in confidence by indemnity applicants, and material that is likely to disclose trade secrets or other privileged or confidential information, and because it is important to keep the values of objects to be indemnified, and the methods of transportation and security measures confidential, the meetings will be closed to the public pursuant to section 552b(c)(4) of Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. I have made this determination under the authority granted me by the Chairman’s Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee Meetings dated July 19, 1993.

Dated: July 6, 2012. Lisette Voyatzis, Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–16903 Filed 7–10–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 7536–01–P**

**NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION** 

**[NRC–2012–0164; Docket Nos. 50–315; 50– 316; License Nos. DPR–58; DPR–74 EA–**  **12–005]**

**In the Matter of Indiana Michigan Power Company, D. C. Cook Nuclear**  **Power Plant; Confirmatory Order Modifying License (Effective**  **Immediately)**

I Indiana Michigan Power Company (Licensee) is the holder of Reactor Operating License Nos. DPR–58 and DPR–74 issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 50, on October 25, 1974, for Unit 1 and on December 23, 1977, for Unit 2. Both licenses were renewed on August 30, 2005. The licenses authorize the operation of the D. C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant in accordance with conditions specified therein.

This Confirmatory Order is the result of an agreement reached during an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mediation session conducted on May 23, 2012. II On June 1, 2011, the NRC Office of Investigations (OI) began an investigation (OI Report No. 3–2011– 011) at the D. C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant. Based on the evidence developed during its investigation, the NRC identified one apparent violation of NRC requirements in 10 CFR Part 26, Sections 4(b) and 31(d)(2)(v) by failing to ensure that an individual, who wasoffsite when selected for Fitness-forDuty (FFD) testing, was tested at the earliest reasonable and practical opportunity when both the donor and collectors were available. The results of the investigation, completed on December 28, 2011, were sent to Indiana Michigan Power Company in a letter dated March 6, 2012.

On May 23, 2012, the NRC and Indiana Michigan Power Company met in an ADR session mediated by a professional mediator, arranged through Cornell University’s Institute on Conflict Resolution. ADR is a process in which a neutral mediator with no decision-making authority assists the parties in reaching an agreement on resolving any differences regarding the dispute. This confirmatory order is issued pursuant to the agreement reached during the ADR process.

III

In response to the NRC’s offer, Indiana Michigan Power Company requested use of the NRC ADR process to resolve differences it had with the NRC. During that ADR session, a preliminary settlement agreement was reached. The elements of the agreement consisted of the following:

1. The licensee has stated that it has completed the following actions, which will be acknowledged in the Confirmatory Order (CO):

a. Benchmarked nine different nuclear utilities for firm definition of ‘‘available’’ in regard to random drug testing;

b. Conducted unannounced FFD testing of the high level individual, who was not tested on May 3, 2011;

c. Revised site procedure SPP–2060– SFI–411, ‘‘Fitness-for-Duty (FFD) Random Selection and Notification Process,’’ to include a definition of ‘‘available’’ for testing as it relates to the FFD random testing process based on the benchmarking results;

d. Performed a gap analysis and revised the FFD collector training material;

e. Briefed the FFD collectors on the changes to the training material; and

f. Reviewed and revised all FFD program implementing procedures to