alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 385.31 Petitions for review. ( a ) *Time for filing.* Petitions for review shall be filed and served within seven (7) days after the date of the staff action to which they relate, but a different period may be fixed in such staff action consistent with effective preservation of the right to petition for discretionary review and the exigencies of the situation.
( b ) *Contents.* Petitions for review shall demonstrate that ( 1 ) a finding of material fact is clearly erroneous;
( 2 ) a legal conclusion is contrary to law, Department rules, or precedent;
( 3 ) a substantial and important question of policy is involved;
( 4 ) a prejudicial procedural error has occurred; or
( 5 ) the staff action is substantially deficient on its face. The petition shall briefly and specifically state the alleged grounds for review and the relief sought. If persons who participated at the staff action level set forth any new facts, arguments, or other new matter, an explanation must be furnished as to why said matter was not previously adduced at the staff action level. In the absence of a valid explanation, the Department may disregard such new matter.
( c ) *Form and filing.* Petitions shall comply with the form and filing requirements of §§ 302.3 and 302.4 of this chapter. (Rules of practice in Economic Proceedings). Petitions shall not exceed 10 pages in length. A greater length, however, may be specified in the staff action taken. The petitions shall be accompanied by proof of required service. However, persons who seek review of a civil penalty proposed by the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings pursuant to § 385.15(a) may submit their request therefor by letter to the Department with a copy to the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings and need not comply with the above form and filing requirements.
( d ) *Service.* A petition filed by a person other than the applicant shall be served on the applicant. Petitions shall also be served on any persons who have served documents on the petitioner at the staff action level; and on such other persons as may be directed by the Department or the staff member who took the action to be reviewed.
( e ) *Answers.* The applicant and such other persons as disclose a substantial interest which would be adversely affected by the relief sought in the petition may, within seven (7) days after filing the petition, file an answer thereto. A different period for the filing of answers may be fixed in the staff action. Such answers shall comply with the form and filing requirements applicable to petitions and shall be served on the applicant and any other person who has theretofore served a document in the matter on such respondent.
[Doc. No. T-1, 49 FR 50985, Dec. 31, 1984. Redesignated and amended by Doc. No. OST-96-1268, 61 FR 19171, May 1, 1996; 65 FR 6457, Feb. 9, 2000]
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 (the
Report) by CGI Group Inc. (the Company), the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 22, 2014



/s/ Michael E. RoachMichael E. RoachPresident andChief Executive Officer
#### § 298.12 Duration of exemption.

The exemption from any provision of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII provided by this part shall continue in effect only until such time as the Department shall find that enforcement of that provision would be in the public interest, at which time the exemption shall terminate or be conditioned with respect to the person, class of persons, or service (e.g., limited-entry foreign air transportation market) subject to the finding.
Attorney Law Firm Party Email HON. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN swaindprcorresp@nysd.uscourts.govGERARDO J. PORTELA FRANCO AND MOHAMMAD YASSIN 

 AAFAF FISCAL AGENCY 

AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY 

Gerardo.Portela@aafaf.pr.govMohammad.Yassin@aafaf.pr.gov

John J. Raspisardi Suzzanne Uhland Peter Friedman NANCY MITCHELL, Maria J. DiConza 

O’Melveny & Myers LLP Counsel for AAFAF jrapisardi@omm.com

suhland@omm.compfriedman@omm.commitchelln@omm.commdiconza@omm.com

Martin J. Bienenstock Paul V. Possinger Maja Zerjal 

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 

Counsel for the OVERSIGHT BOARD 

mbienenstock@proskauer.comppossinger@proskauer.commzarjal@proskauer.com

HERMANN D. BAUER, ESQ O'NEILL & BORGES 

LLC 

Counsel for THE OVERSIGHT BOARD 

HERMAN.BAUER@ONEILLBORGES.COM

Luc A. Despins, James R. Bliss James B. Worthington G. Alexander Bongartz 

PAUL HASTINGS LLP Counsel for the Creditors 

Committee 

lucdespins@paulhastings.comjamesbliss@paulhastings.comjamesworthington@paulhastings.comalexbongartz@paulhastings.com

Juan J. Casillas Ayala Diana M Batlle-Barasorda Alberto J. E. Añeses Negron Erica C. Montull-Novoa 

Casillas, Santiago & Torres LLC 

Counsel for the Creditors Committee 

jcasillas@cstlawpr.comdbatlle@cstlawpr.comaaneses@cstlawpr.comemontull@cstlawpr.com

Robert Gordon Richard Levin Catherine Steege 

Jenner & Block LLp Counsel for Retiree Committee rgordon@jenner.com

rlevin@jenner.comcsteege@jenner.com

A.J. Bennazar-Zequeira Bennazar, Garcia & 

Milian CSP 

Counsel for Retiree Committee ajb@bennazar.org

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4175-1 Filed:11/05/18 Entered:11/05/18 17:55:05 De

Exhibit A Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arthur Miller, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 893]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 2, 1997 *(People v Miller,*240 AD2d 435), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 10, 1996.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

Motion submitting Part of Exhibit II of BDO Puerto Rico, PSC’s (now known as, Old Puerto 

Rico, PSC) Response to 570th Omnibus Objection

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

COMES NOW BDO Puerto Rico PSC (now known as, Old Puerto Rico, PSC) 

represented by the undersigned attorney and respectfully sets forth and prays:

1. Exhibit no. II of the appearing party’s Response to the 570th Omnibus objection contains 830 pages. 

Due to the data storage limits set by the CM/ECF system when filing an exhibit, Creditor BDO Puerto 

Rico PSC (hereinafter “OLD”) must file Exhibit II in parts. ECF no. 24317.

2. Therefore, Creditor OLD will file several notices with Exhibit II divided into parts of approximately 

70 to 95 pages each. With this motion, Creditor includes pages 151-211 of Exhibit II. 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective title III case number and the last four (4) 

digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) 

Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric 

Power Authority (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case 

numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24322 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 14:25:07 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE, Creditor hereby submits the attached partial Exhibit II for its Response 

to the 570th Omnibus Objection filed today at ECF no. 24317.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: In accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9014(b), Fed. R. 

Bankr. P. 7004(b), and the Court’s Sixteenth Amended Notice, Case Management and 

Administrative Procedures Order (Dkt. No. 20190-1) (the “CMP Order”), I hereby certify that a 

true and exact copy of the foregoing was sent by electronic mail upon all the parties listed in the 

Master Service List and by U.S. mail upon all the Standard Parties listed in the CMP Order.

 In Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, on May 25, 2023. 

Juan R. Rivera Font, LLC

27 González Giusti 

Ave.

Suite 602

Guaynabo, PR 00968

Tel: 787-250-8040

s/Juan R. Rivera Font

Juan R. Rivera-Font, Esq.

USDC-PR 221703

 juan@riverafont.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24322 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 14:25:07 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Capital  Bank  Corporation  (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q for the  period  ending  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A.
Beck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.






/s/ James A. Beck
-----------------
James A. Beck
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
§ 34.31 Standards for exhaust emissions. ( a ) Exhaust emissions of smoke from each in-use aircraft gas turbine engine of Class T8, beginning February 1, 1974, shall not exceed a smoke number (SN) of 30.
( b ) Exhaust emissions of smoke from each in-use aircraft gas turbine engine of Class TF and of rated output of 129 kN (29,000 lb) thrust or greater, beginning January l, 1976, shall not exceed SN = 83.6(rO)−0.274 (rO is in kN).
( c ) The standards set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section refer to exhaust smoke emission emitted during operation of the engine as specified in the applicable sections of subpart G of this part, and measured and calculated in accordance with the procedures set forth in subpart G.
[Doc. No. FAA-2012-1333, 77 FR 76852, Dec. 31, 2012]
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of Americas Power Partners, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    
|--------------------
|                    
|/s/ Mark A. Margason
|Mark A. Margason    
|January 19, 2005
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-28 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc:

Appendix Summons David A. Skeel Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-28 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc:

Appendix Summons David A. Skeel Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Samuel Stanger, Appellant.

(Submitted October 14, 1936;

decided November 17, 1936.)

*Samuel Segal*for appellant.

*William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney (Edwin J. Talley*of counsel), for respondent.

*608Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Finch, JJ.; Crouch, J., taking no part.
#### § 31.65 Position lights.

(a) If position lights are installed, there must be one steady aviation white position light and one flashing aviation red (or flashing aviation white) position light with an effective flash frequency of at least 40, but not more than 100, cycles per minute.

(b) Each light must provide 360° horizontal coverage at the intensities prescribed in this paragraph. The following light intensities must be determined with the light source operating at a steady state and with all light covers and color filters in place and at the manufacturer's rated minimum voltage. For the flashing aviation red light, the measured values must be adjusted to correspond to a red filter temperature of at least 130 °F:

(1) The intensities in the horizontal plane passing through the light unit must equal or exceed the following values:

| Position light | Minimum intensity (candles) |
| --- | --- |
| Steady white | 20 |
| Flashing red or white | 40 |

(2) The intensities in vertical planes must equal or exceed the following values. An intensity of one unit corresponds to the applicable horizontal plane intensity specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.

| Angles above and below the horizontal in any vertical plane (degrees) | Minimum intensity (units) |
| --- | --- |
| 0 | 1.00 |
| 0 to 5 | 0.90 |
| 5 to 10 | 0.80 |
| 10 to 15 | 0.70 |
| 15 to 20 | 0.50 |
| 20 to 30 | 0.30 |
| 30 to 40 | 0.10 |
| 40 to 60 | 0.05 |

(c) The steady white light must be located not more than 20 feet below the basket, trapeze, or other means for carrying occupants. The flashing red or white light must be located not less than 7, nor more than 10, feet below the steady white light.

(d) There must be a means to retract and store the lights.

(e) Each position light color must have the applicable International Commission on Illumination chromaticity coordinates as follows:

(1) *Aviation red* —

*y* is not greater than 0.335; and *z* is not greater than 0.002.

(2) *Aviation white* —

*x* is not less than 0.300 and not greater than 0.540;

*y* is not less than *x*−0.040 or *y*o−0.010, whichever is the smaller; and

*y* is not greater than *x* + 0.020 nor 0.636−0.0400 *x*;

Where *y*o is the *y* coordinate of the Planckian radiator for the value of *x* considered.

[Doc. No. 1437, 29 FR 8258, July 1, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 31-1, 29 FR 14563, Oct. 24, 1964; Amdt. 31-4, 45 FR 60179, Sept. 11, 1980]
| (1) | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 1, 2011                                    |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                        |   |
| /s/      Alton L. Boynton                                   |   |
| Alton      L. Boynton                                       |   |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer                  |   |
| (Principal      Executive Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

----
1

EXHIBIT E

BREAKDOWN OF COMPENSATION AND EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 

REQUESTED BY DEBTOR

October 2022 Fee Statement

Debtor Fees

Fees 

Requested to 

be Paid 

(90%)

Expenses 

Requested to 

be Paid 

(100%)

Total 

Requested to 

be Paid

Commonwealth of PR $17,712.00 $15,940.80 $70.70 $16,011.50 

PREPA $18,399.00 $16,559.10 $0.00 $16,559.10 

HTA $2,925.00 $2,632.50 $0.00 $2,632.50 

ERS $900.00 $810.00 $0.00 $810.00 

Total $39,936.00 $35,942.40 $70.70 $36,013.10 

November 2022 Fee Statement

Debtor Fees

Fees 

Requested to 

be Paid 

(90%)

Expenses 

Requested to 

be Paid 

(100%)

Total 

Requested to 

be Paid

Commonwealth of PR $14,532.50 $13,079.25 $197.76 $13,277.01 

PREPA $33,707.00 $30,336.30 $1.60 $30,337.90 

HTA $1,092.00 $982.80 $0.00 $982.80 

ERS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 

Total $49,331.50 $44,398.35 $199.36 $44,597.71 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23817-7 Filed:03/15/23 Entered:03/15/23 19:43:52 Desc:

Exhibit E Page 1 of 2
2

December 2022 Fee Statement

Debtor Fees

Fees 

Requested to 

be Paid 

(90%)

Expenses 

Requested to 

be Paid 

(100%)

Total 

Requested to 

be Paid

Commonwealth of PR $13,525.00 $12,172.50 $23.90 $12,196.40 

PREPA $25,608.00 $23,047.20 $0.00 $23,047.20 

HTA $453.00 $407.70 $0.00 $407.70 

ERS $306.00 $275.40 $0.00 $275.40 

Total $39,892.00 $35,902.80 $23.90 $35,926.70 

January 2023 Fee Statement

Debtor Fees

Fees 

Requested to 

be Paid 

(90%)

Expenses 

Requested to 

be Paid 

(100%)

Total 

Requested to 

be Paid

Commonwealth of PR $12,360.00 $11,124.00 $556.10 $11,680.10 

PREPA $18,271.00 $16,443.90 $278.00 $16,721.90 

HTA $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 

ERS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 

Total $30,631.00 $27,567.90 $834.10 $28,402.00 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23817-7 Filed:03/15/23 Entered:03/15/23 19:43:52 Desc:

Exhibit E Page 2 of 2
#### John Stelbuszeski, Respondent, *v.*Benjamin B. Wesley, Appellant.

(Submitted October 5, 1936;

decided October 6, 1936.)

*Francis A. McAnaney*for motion.

*Philip Silver*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, unless briefs are filed and served within thirty days, in which event the motion is denied.
500

600

550

500

600

500

600

550

550

450

550

500

450

550

500

359

359

359

W O R M S E R R D

S A E N Z S T

M O N G O N A -H E IN R D

M IL A G R O R D

T IE R R A B O N IT A

359

359

359

W O R M S E R R D

S A E N Z S T

M O N G O N A -H E IN R D

M IL A G R O R D

T IE R R A B O N IT A

Blancas Creek

Bla

n

cas Creek

D

olores Creek

Dolores

Creek

Bla

ncas Creek

Blancas Creek

Dolores

Cree

k

Blancas Creek

Lobo Creek

Dolores Creek

Dolores Cre

e

k

Lobo

Creek

D

olores Creek

Pueblo

Nuevo

Colonia

San

Carlos Number

2 Colonia

Laredo

Ranchettes

Colonia

San Carlos

Number 1

Colonia

Laredo

Ranchettes

Ranchitos

359 East

Colonia

Las Blancas

Colonia

Trevino

Lake Dam

Flores

Lake Dam

Tios

Creek

Retama

Creek

Laredo

South

Burrito

Tank

O'Keefe

Lake

Agua Azul

Creek West

Laredo

East

Blancas

Creek

South

Blancas

Creek

North

FEET

FEET

710 000FEET

99°15'

22'

30"

27°

27°

20' 30"

30"

99°

99°

22'

30"

30'

17'

99°

22'

20'

27°

30"

30"

27°30'

15'

22'

17'

27'30" 27'30"

25' 25'

17 070 000

740 000FEET

17 030000

E

000m

30

4

4

30

4 4

30

30

30

4

4

30

4

30

4

4

30

4

30

4

30

4

30

30

4

30

30

4

4 4

30

30

4

30

30

30

4

4

30

30

30

4

30

30

000m

30

30

4

4 4 000m

000m

E

69 72 75

38

68

36

N

73

31

41

65 66

36

34

67

39

33

35

64

65 71

74

29

70

68

39

32

31

74

32

37

29

41

75

33

73

70

40

64 66

35

30

40

69

37

30

72

38

71

34

N

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2799-134

BLANCAS CREEK NORTH, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

BLANCAS CREEK NORTH QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2004

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 9 ́

3 MILS

5° 34 ́

99 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

MR

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
§ 271.5 Carrier revenues. ( a ) The projected passenger revenue for a carrier providing essential air service at an eligible place will be calculated by multiplying the following: ( 1 ) A reasonable projected net fare, which is the standard fare expected to be charged for service between the eligible place and the designated hub less any dilution caused by joint fare arrangements, discount fares that it offers, or prorates of fares for through one-line passengers; and
( 2 ) The traffic (including both local and beyond traffic) projected to flow between the eligible place and the designated hub or hubs, which is based on the carrier's own estimates, Department estimates, and on traffic levels in the market at issue when such data are available.
( b ) The reasonableness of a carrier's passenger revenue projections will be evaluated by: ( 1 ) Comparing the carrier's proposed fare with the fare charged in other city-pair markets of similar distances and traffic densities; and
( 2 ) Comparing the carrier's proposed pricing structure with historical pricing practices in the market at issue, with the pricing practices of that carrier in other markets, and with any standard industry pricing guidelines that may be available.
( c ) An estimate of freight and other transport-related revenue will be included as a component of projected revenues and will be based on recent experience in the market involved and on the experience of the carrier involved in other markets.
[ER-1398, 49 FR 49846, Dec. 24, 1984, as amended at 60 FR 43524, Aug. 22, 1995]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23

- 0378 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CYLE RAMSEY MADGWICK, Defendant and Appellant

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 6 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 26 2024

03/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0378