alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 29.67 Climb: One engine inoperative (OEI). ( a ) For Category A rotorcraft, in the critical takeoff configuration existing along the takeoff path, the following apply: ( 1 ) The steady rate of climb without ground effect, 200 feet above the takeoff surface, must be at least 100 feet per minute for each weight, altitude, and temperature for which takeoff data are to be scheduled with— ( i ) The critical engine inoperative and the remaining engines within approved operating limitations, except that for rotorcraft for which the use of 30-second/2-minute OEI power is requested, only the 2-minute OEI power may be used in showing compliance with this paragraph;
( ii ) The landing gear extended; and
( iii ) The takeoff safety speed selected by the applicant.
( 2 ) The steady rate of climb without ground effect, 1000 feet above the takeoff surface, must be at least 150 feet per minute, for each weight, altitude, and temperature for which takeoff data are to be scheduled with— ( i ) The critical engine inoperative and the remaining engines at maximum continuous power including continuous OEI power, if approved, or at 30-minute OEI power for rotorcraft for which certification for use of 30-minute OEI power is requested;
( ii ) The landing gear retracted; and
( iii ) The speed selected by the applicant.
( 3 ) The steady rate of climb (or descent) in feet per minute, at each altitude and temperature at which the rotorcraft is expected to operate and at any weight within the range of weights for which certification is requested, must be determined with— ( i ) The critical engine inoperative and the remaining engines at maximum continuous power including continuous OEI power, if approved, and at 30-minute OEI power for rotorcraft for which certification for the use of 30-minute OEI power is requested;
( ii ) The landing gear retracted; and
( iii ) The speed selected by the applicant.
( b ) For multiengine Category B rotorcraft meeting the Category A engine isolation requirements, the steady rate of climb (or descent) must be determined at the speed for best rate of climb (or minimum rate of descent) at each altitude, temperature, and weight at which the rotorcraft is expected to operate, with the critical engine inoperative and the remaining engines at maximum continuous power including continuous OEI power, if approved, and at 30-minute OEI power for rotorcraft for which certification for the use of 30-minute OEI power is requested.
[Doc. No. 24802, 61 FR 21900, May 10, 1996; 61 FR 33963, July 1, 1996, as amended by Amdt. 29-44, 64 FR 45337, Aug. 19, 1999; 64 FR 47563, Aug. 31, 1999]
§ 382.123 What are the requirements concerning priority cabin stowage for wheelchairs and other assistive devices? ( a ) The following rules apply to the stowage of passengers' wheelchairs or other assistive devices in the priority stowage area provided for in § 382.67 of this part: ( 1 ) You must ensure that a passenger with a disability who uses a wheelchair and takes advantage of the opportunity to preboard the aircraft can stow his or her wheelchair in this area, with priority over other items brought onto the aircraft by other passengers or crew enplaning at the same airport, consistent with FAA, PHMSA, TSA, or applicable foreign government requirements concerning security, safety, and hazardous materials with respect to the stowage of carry-on items. You must move items that you or your personnel have placed in the priority stowage area (*e.g.,* crew luggage, an on-board wheelchair) to make room for the passenger's wheelchair, even if these items were stowed in the priority stowage area before the passenger seeking to stow a wheelchair boarded the aircraft (*e.g.,* the items were placed there on a previous leg of the flight).
( 2 ) You must also ensure that a passenger with a disability who takes advantage of the opportunity to preboard the aircraft can stow other assistive devices in this area, with priority over other items (except wheelchairs) brought onto the aircraft by other passengers enplaning at the same airport consistent with FAA, PHMSA, TSA, or applicable foreign government requirements concerning security, safety, and hazardous materials with respect to the stowage of carry-on items.
( 3 ) You must ensure that a passenger with a disability who does not take advantage of the opportunity to preboard is able to use the area to stow his or her wheelchair or other assistive device on a first-come, first-served basis along with all other passengers seeking to stow carry-on items in the area.
( b ) If a wheelchair exceeds the space provided for in § 382.67 of this part while fully assembled but will fit if wheels or other components can be removed without the use of tools, you must remove the applicable components and stow the wheelchair in the designated space. In this case, you must stow the removed components in areas provided for stowage of carry-on luggage.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2004-19482, 73 FR 27665, May 13, 2008, as amended at 78 FR 67924, Nov. 12, 2013]
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the periodic report of Asiamart, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kwan Pui Wong, Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
      as
      of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
      of
      the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.




Date:
                November 19, 2008
            /s/
                Kwan Pui WongKwan
                Pui WongChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
# L_2009282EN.01004401.xml

| 29.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 282/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 282/44

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 147 of 30 June 1995
  )

On page 9, Article 5(3), point (b):

for:

| ‘(b) | they are accompanied by a written undertaking to submit, in respect of quantities awarded and within two days of receipt of notification of award pursuant to Article 7(3), an application for advance fixing of an export refund or, where applicable, an application for advance fixing of an export tax equal to the amount tendered;’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

they are accompanied by a written undertaking to submit, in respect of quantities awarded and within two days of receipt of notification of award pursuant to Article 7(3), an application for advance fixing of an export refund or, where applicable, an application for advance fixing of an export tax equal to the amount tendered;’,

read:

| ‘(b) | they are accompanied by a written undertaking to submit, in respect of quantities awarded and within two days of receipt of the notification of award pursuant to Article 7(3), an export licence application or, where applicable, an application for an export licence with advance fixing of an export tax equal to the amount tendered;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

they are accompanied by a written undertaking to submit, in respect of quantities awarded and within two days of receipt of the notification of award pursuant to Article 7(3), an export licence application or, where applicable, an application for an export licence with advance fixing of an export tax equal to the amount tendered;’.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of ServiceWare Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

<Table>
<S>                                             <C>
Dated: March 29, 2004                           /s/ KENT HEYMAN
                                                ---------------------------------------------
                                                Name: Kent Heyman
                                                Title: President, Principal Executive Officer
                                                      and Director

Dated: March 29, 2004                           /s/ SCOTT SCHWARTZMAN
                                                ---------------------------------------------
                                                Name: Scott Schwartzman
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer,
                                                      Chief Operating Officer, Secretary
                                                      and Principal Financial Officer
</Table>

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered
filed as part of the Form 10-K.

                                        74
§ 25.2 Special retroactive requirements. The following special retroactive requirements are applicable to an airplane for which the regulations referenced in the type certificate predate the sections specified below— ( a ) Irrespective of the date of application, each applicant for a supplemental type certificate (or an amendment to a type certificate) involving an increase in passenger seating capacity to a total greater than that for which the airplane has been type certificated must show that the airplane concerned meets the requirements of: ( 1 ) Sections 25.721(d), 25.783(g), 25.785(c), 25.803(c)(2) through (9), 25.803 (d) and (e), 25.807 (a), (c), and (d), 25.809 (f) and (h), 25.811, 25.812, 25.813 (a), (b), and (c), 25.815, 25.817, 25.853 (a) and (b), 25.855(a), 25.993(f), and 25.1359(c) in effect on October 24, 1967, and
( 2 ) Sections 25.803(b) and 25.803(c)(1) in effect on April 23, 1969.
( b ) Irrespective of the date of application, each applicant for a supplemental type certificate (or an amendment to a type certificate) for an airplane manufactured after October 16, 1987, must show that the airplane meets the requirements of § 25.807(c)(7) in effect on July 24, 1989.
( c ) Compliance with subsequent revisions to the sections specified in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may be elected or may be required in accordance with § 21.101(a) of this chapter.
[Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29773, July 20, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 25-99, 65 FR 36266, June 7, 2000]
§ 65.37 Skill requirements: Operating positions. No person may act as an air traffic control tower operator at any operating position unless he has passed a practical test on— ( a ) Control tower equipment and its use;
( b ) Weather reporting procedures and use of reports;
( c ) Notices to Airmen, and use of the Airman's Information Manual;
( d ) Use of operational forms;
( e ) Performance of noncontrol operational duties; and
( f ) Each of the following procedures that is applicable to that operating position and is required by the person performing the examination: ( 1 ) The airport, including rules, equipment, runways, taxiways, and obstructions.
( 2 ) The terrain features, visual checkpoints, and obstructions within the lateral boundaries of the surface areas of Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace designated for the airport.
( 3 ) Traffic patterns and associated procedures for use of preferential runways and noise abatement.
( 4 ) Operational agreements.
( 5 ) The center, alternate airports, and those airways, routes, reporting points, and air navigation aids used for terminal air traffic control.
( 6 ) Search and rescue procedures.
( 7 ) Terminal air traffic control procedures and phraseology.
( 8 ) Holding procedures, prescribed instrument approach, and departure procedures.
( 9 ) Radar alignment and technical operation.
( 10 ) The application of the prescribed radar and nonradar separation standard, as appropriate.
[Doc. No. 10193, 35 FR 12326, Aug. 1, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 65-36, 56 FR 65653, Dec. 17, 1991]
§ 48.15 Requirement to register. No person may operate a small unmanned aircraft that is eligible for registration under 49 U.S.C. 44101-44103 unless one of the following criteria has been satisfied: ( a ) The owner has registered and marked the aircraft in accordance with this part;
( b ) The aircraft is operated exclusively in compliance with 49 U.S.C. 44809 and weighs 0.55 pounds or less on takeoff, including everything that is on board or otherwise attached to the aircraft; or
( c ) The aircraft is an aircraft of the Armed Forces of the United States.
[Doc. No. FAA-2015-7396; Amdt. No. 48-1; 80 FR 78645, Dec. 16, 2015, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2019-1100; Amdt. No. 48-3; 86 FR 4504, Jan. 15, 2021]
#### MOORE v. ATCHISON, T. & S. F. R. CO.

No. 29760.

June 25, 1940.

*104 P. 2d 236.*

Leslie L. Conner, of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Rainey, Flynn, Green & Anderson, of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

This action was instituted by J. L. Moore on October 26, 1939, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. §§ 51-59), against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been *535sustained on January 24, 1937, but which did not result in any appreciable disability until approximately two years thereafter. Demurrer to said petition was sustained, and upon election of plaintiff to stand upon his petition, the action was dismissed and judgment for costs entered in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff has perfected this appeal. The question which we are called upon to determine is whether an action for personal injury brought under the provisions of Federal Employers’ Liability Act accrues upon the date of the injury or upon the date when the result of the injury becomes apparent.

The act involved, being one enacted by the Congress of the United States, must receive the construction which the Supreme Court of the United States has placed thereon. See Seaboard Airline Ry. Co. v. Brooks, 151 Ga. 625, 107 S. E. 878. In the act (45 U.S.C.A. § 56), it is provided in part as follows:

> “No action shall be maintained under this chapter unless commenced within two years from the date the cause of action accrued.”

The Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Reading Co. v. Koons, 271 U. S. 58, 46 S. Ct. 405, 70 L. Ed. 835, holds that the right to recovery by an employee for personal injury under said act accrues on the date that the accident occurs and that the right to recover for wrongful death accrues on the date that the death occurs. On this latter phase we so held in the case of Lindsay v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 56 Okla. 234, 155 P. 1173.

The limitation provided in the act, supra, is one upon the right and not merely one upon the remedy. Bell v. Wabash Ry. Co., 58 F. 2d 569, and cases therein cited and discussed. The right is one to recover for the injury or wrongful death. For this reason there is no analogy between the cases of Swift & Co. v. State Industrial Commission, 161 Okla. 132, 17 P. 2d 435, and Bartlett-Collins Co. v. Roach, 180 Okla. 521, 71 P. 2d 489, cited by the plaintiff. Said cases deal with awards made under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The award in such a case is never one for injury sustained, but rather for compensation, in lieu of wages lost as a result of disability. There is no question of negligence involved in such cases. The recovery under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act requires proof of negligence, and the right to maintain the action is limited.

The petition here involved showed on its face that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. Under these circumstances, a demurrer to said petition was properly sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, HURST, and DANNER, JJ., concur.
§ 77.35 Extensions, terminations, revisions and corrections. ( a ) You may petition the FAA official that issued the Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation to revise or reconsider the determination based on new facts or to extend the effective period of the determination, provided that: ( 1 ) Actual structural work of the proposed construction or alteration, such as the laying of a foundation, but not including excavation, has not been started; and
( 2 ) The petition is submitted at least 15 days before the expiration date of the Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation.
( b ) A Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation issued for those construction or alteration proposals not requiring an FCC construction permit may be extended by the FAA one time for a period not to exceed 18 months.
( c ) A Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation issued for a proposal requiring an FCC construction permit may be granted extensions for up to 18 months, provided that: ( 1 ) You submit evidence that an application for a construction permit/license was filed with the FCC for the associated site within 6 months of issuance of the determination; and
( 2 ) You submit evidence that additional time is warranted because of FCC requirements; and
( 3 ) Where the FCC issues a construction permit, a final Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation is effective until the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of the construction. If an extension of the original FCC completion date is needed, an extension of the FAA determination must be requested from the Obstruction Evaluation Service (OES).
( 4 ) If the Commission refuses to issue a construction permit, the final determination expires on the date of its refusal.
#### Joseph G. Vielberth, Appellant, *v.*The State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 23726.)

Argued March 12, 1937;

decided April 20, 1937.

*668
      *Max Horowitz*and *Solon B. Lilienstern*for appellant.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Leon M. Layden*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         156
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  192
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    27,679
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               31,353
<PP&E>                                         27,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          258,963
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       99,217
<OTHER-SE>                                     (378,828)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,016
<SALES>                                        12,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,691
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  44,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (32,626)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (32,607)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (32,607)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        


</TABLE>
§ 398.10 Overflights. The Department considers it a violation of 49 U.S.C. 41732 and the air service guarantees provided under this part for an air carrier providing essential air service to an eligible place to overfly that place, except under one or more of the following circumstances: ( a ) The carrier is not compensated for serving that place and another carrier is providing by its flights the service required by the Department's essential air service determination for that place;
( b ) Circumstances beyond the carrier's control prevent it from landing at the eligible place;
( c ) The flight involved is not in a market where the Department has determined air service to be essential; or
( d ) The eligible place is a place in Alaska for which the Department's essential air service determination permits the overflight.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Luther E. Proper, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|By:            |  | /s/ Luther E. Proper   
|               |  | Luther E. Proper       
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer
|              
|March 22, 2010

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.