alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Hoenig, Respondent, *v.*Central Stamping Company, Appellant.

Submitted December 4, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*H. Preston Coursen*for appellant.

*David T. Sutton*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

*486Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Lough-ran and Finch, JJ. Crane, Ch. J., dissents in the following opinion:

Crane, Ch. J.

(dissenting). This proposed decision carries the doctrine of *MacPherson*v. *Buick Motor Co.*(217 N. Y. 382) entirely too far.

It would make the manufacturer of every coffee pot or dishpan liable for the consequences of a broken handle, no matter how far removed the injured person might be from the original purchaser. There must be a limit somewhere. There must be something more than a possibility of danger, at least a probability. An exploding coffee urn or glass jar or breaking wheel will almost certainly cause serious injury. The manufacturer alone can guard against such defects. Not so with handles to receptacles which may be safely used.

This coffee urn was so heavy when filled that the plaintiff himself says that they first lifted it upon the stove and then filled it with hot water from the pail. Nowhere does he explain why it could not have been left upon the gas stove and coffee served from there or poured out into other receptacles. If it went in from a pail at one end, there is no reason stated why it could not come out in a pail at the other end. Instead of that the plaintiff, knowing it was too heavy to lift when filled, attempted *to*remove it from the stove after the contents had been . heated. This is his testimony. There is nothing in the evidence to show that coffee urns of this weight were usually carried around by the handles or that the manufacturer had any reason to suppose that they would be when filled with boiling substance.

For these reasons I do not think that the plaintiff made out a case, and that his complaint should be dismissed.
§ 35.23 Propeller control system. The requirements of this section apply to any system or component that controls, limits or monitors propeller functions. ( a ) The propeller control system must be designed, constructed and validated to show that: ( 1 ) The propeller control system, operating in normal and alternative operating modes and in transition between operating modes, performs the functions defined by the applicant throughout the declared operating conditions and flight envelope.
( 2 ) The propeller control system functionality is not adversely affected by the declared environmental conditions, including temperature, electromagnetic interference (EMI), high intensity radiated fields (HIRF) and lightning. The environmental limits to which the system has been satisfactorily validated must be documented in the appropriate propeller manuals.
( 3 ) A method is provided to indicate that an operating mode change has occurred if flight crew action is required. In such an event, operating instructions must be provided in the appropriate manuals.
( b ) The propeller control system must be designed and constructed so that, in addition to compliance with § 35.15: ( 1 ) No single failure or malfunction of electrical or electronic components in the control system results in a hazardous propeller effect.
( 2 ) Failures or malfunctions directly affecting the propeller control system in a typical airplane, such as structural failures of attachments to the control, fire, or overheat, do not lead to a hazardous propeller effect.
( 3 ) The loss of normal propeller pitch control does not cause a hazardous propeller effect under the intended operating conditions.
( 4 ) The failure or corruption of data or signals shared across propellers does not cause a hazardous propeller effect.
( c ) Electronic propeller control system imbedded software must be designed and implemented by a method approved by the Administrator that is consistent with the criticality of the performed functions and that minimizes the existence of software errors.
( d ) The propeller control system must be designed and constructed so that the failure or corruption of airplane-supplied data does not result in hazardous propeller effects.
( e ) The propeller control system must be designed and constructed so that the loss, interruption or abnormal characteristic of airplane-supplied electrical power does not result in hazardous propeller effects. The power quality requirements must be described in the appropriate manuals.
[Amdt. 35-8, 73 FR 63347, Oct. 24, 2008]
#### § 382.80 May carriers impose additional restrictions on the transport of service animals?

Carriers are not permitted to establish additional restrictions on the transport of service animals outside of those specifically permitted by the provisions in this part, unless required by applicable FAA, TSA, or other Federal requirements or a foreign carrier's government.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2018-0068, 85 FR 79774, Dec. 10, 2020]
```

Exhibit 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES_OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Consolidated Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10_KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the "Report"), I,
David Guthrie, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes_Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/ David Guthrie

David Guthrie
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2003
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.707 Procedure for fixing temporary mail rates.

At any time during the pendency of a proceeding for the determination of final mail rates, the DOT decisionmaker, upon his or her own initiative, or on petition by the air carrier whose rates are in issue or by the U.S. Postal Service, may fix temporary rates of compensation for the transportation of mail subject to downward or upward adjustment upon the determination of final mail rates.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 (the 10-Q) of GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (GEO) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GEO as of the dates and for the periods covered by the 10-Q.

|                        | GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc.                       
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                        |                                                     
|Date: November 12, 2002 | By: /s/ William P. Eckman                           
|                        |                                                     
|                        | William P. Eckman                                   
|                        |                                                     
|                        | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Tauba Gelberg, Respondent, *v.*Harry Gelberg, Appellant.

(Submitted October 5, 1936;

decided October 13, 1936.)

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 269 N. Y. 606.'
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CFO CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted), Carter D. Hicks, the Chief FinancialOfficer of Digital River, Inc. (the“***Company***”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2002, and to which this Certification isattached as Exhibit 99.2 (the “***Annual Report***”) fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

2.     The information contained in the AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

**In Witness Whereof**,the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 28th day of March,2003.

 
|   | /s/ Carter D. Hicks      |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Carter D. Hicks          |   |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by section 906 has been provided to Digital River,Inc. and will be retained by Digital River, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This certification"accompanies" the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Securities Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before orafter the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.

----
The following cases in wh ich the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been appealed to the Supreme Court:

1. Timothy Lawerence Doscoli v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0517-15-3 Opinion rendered by Judge Petty on June 21, 2016

2. Robert Van Buren, Sr. v. Augusta County, et al.
Record No. 1975-15-3 Opinion rendered by Judge AtLee on July 19, 2016The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issu ed published opinions have been disposed of by the Supreme Court:

1. Mark O’Hara Wright
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0585-13-3 Opinion rendered by Judge Petty on November 18, 2014 Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed and final judgment entered in part by opin ion rendered on August 18, 2016 (150181)

2. Andrew Wallace
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 1476-14-1 Opinion rendered by Judge Petty on July 28, 2015 Affirmed by order entered on June 2, 2016 (151296)

3. Clayton George Smith
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0427-14-4 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on October 31, 2015 Refused (151865)

4. Cris R. Anderson v. Cris R. Anderson, d/b/a Anderson Plumbing and Firstcomp Insurance Company
Record No. 0697-15-2 Opinion rendered by Judge Russell on November 10, 2015 Dismissed pursuant to Code § 17.1-410(A)(2) and (B) (151873)

5. Jerrell Cortez Edwards
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0954-14-1 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien on December 22, 2015 Refused (160123)

6. Marquis Durrell Jennings
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0063-15-1 Opinion rendered by Judge AtLee on December 22, 2015 Refused (160131)The Supreme Court issued an opinion in the following case, which had been appealed from this Court:

1. Artvaius Darrell Scott v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0626-14-2 CAV petition for appeal denied by Judge Kelsey on March 18, 2015 and by Chief Judge Huff , Judges Beales and AtLee on May 20, 2015 Judgment of Court of Appeals affirm ed by opinion rendered on August 18, 2016 (150932)
§ 29.1459 Flight data recorders. ( a ) Each flight recorder required by the operating rules of Subchapter G of this chapter must be installed so that: ( 1 ) It is supplied with airspeed, altitude, and directional data obtained from sources that meet the accuracy requirements of §§ 29.1323, 29.1325, and 29.1327 of this part, as applicable;
( 2 ) The vertical acceleration sensor is rigidly attached, and located longitudinally within the approved center of gravity limits of the rotorcraft;
( 3 ) ( i ) It receives its electrical power from the bus that provides the maximum reliability for operation of the flight data recorder without jeopardizing service to essential or emergency loads.
( ii ) It remains powered for as long as possible without jeopardizing emergency operation of the rotorcraft.
( 4 ) There is an aural or visual means for perflight checking of the recorder for proper recording of data in the storage medium;
( 5 ) Except for recorders powered solely by the engine-drive electrical generator system, there is an automatic means to simultaneously stop a recorder that has a data erasure feature and prevent each erasure feature from functioning, within 10 minutes after any crash impact; and
( 6 ) Whether the cockpit voice recorder and digital flight data recorder are installed in separate boxes or in a combination unit, no single electrical failure external to the recorder may disable both the cockpit voice recorder and the digital flight data recorder.
( b ) Each nonejectable recorder container must be located and mounted so as to minimize the probability of container rupture resulting from crash impact and subsequent damage to the record from fire.
( c ) A correlation must be established between the flight recorder readings of airspeed, altitude, and heading and the corresponding readings (taking into account correction factors) of the first pilot's instruments. This correlation must cover the airspeed range over which the aircraft is to be operated, the range of altitude to which the aircraft is limited, and 360 degrees of heading. Correlation may be established on the ground as appropriate.
( d ) Each recorder container must: ( 1 ) Be either bright orange or bright yellow;
( 2 ) Have a reflective tape affixed to its external surface to facilitate its location under water; and
( 3 ) Have an underwater locating device, when required by the operating rules of this chapter, on or adjacent to the container which is secured in such a manner that it is not likely to be separated during crash impact.
( e ) When both a cockpit voice recorder and a flight data recorder are required by the operating rules, one combination unit may be installed, provided that all other requirements of this section and the requirements for cockpit voice recorders under this part are met.
[Amdt. 29-25, 53 FR 26145, July 11, 1988; 53 FR 26144, July 11, 1988, as amended by Amdt. 29-50, 73 FR 12564, Mar. 7, 2008; 74 FR 32800, July 9, 2009; Amdt. 29-52, 75 FR 17045, Apr. 5, 2010]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11758]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: May 10, 2000.
    Time: 10 am to 11 am.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Carl D. Banner, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5212, MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
1251, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c2e2d2222293e2f0c283e2b62222524622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e183808f8f849382a1859386cf8f8889cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: May 10, 2000.
    Time: 10:30 am to 12 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Priscilla B. Chen, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4104, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1787.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 3, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-11758 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 437.55 Hazard analysis. ( a ) A permittee must identify and characterize each of the hazards and assess the risk to public health and safety and the safety of property resulting from each permitted flight. This hazard analysis must— ( 1 ) Identify and describe hazards, including but not limited to each of those that result from— ( i ) Component, subsystem, or system failures or faults;
( ii ) Software errors;
( iii ) Environmental conditions;
( iv ) Human errors;
( v ) Design inadequacies; or
( vi ) Procedural deficiencies.
( 2 ) Determine the likelihood of occurrence and consequence for each hazard before risk elimination or mitigation.
( 3 ) Ensure that the likelihood and consequence of each hazard meet the following criteria through risk elimination and mitigation measures: ( i ) The likelihood of any hazardous condition that may cause death or serious injury to the public must be extremely remote.
( ii ) The likelihood of any hazardous condition that may cause major property damage to the public, major safety-critical system damage or reduced capability, a significant reduction in safety margins, or a significant increase in crew workload must be remote.
( 4 ) Identify and describe the risk elimination and mitigation measures required to satisfy paragraph (a)(3) of this section. The measures must include one or more of the following: ( i ) Designing for minimum risk,
( ii ) Incorporating safety devices,
( iii ) Providing warning devices, or
( iv ) Implementing procedures and training.
( 5 ) Demonstrate that the risk elimination and mitigation measures achieve the risk levels of paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section through validation and verification. Verification includes: ( i ) Test data,
( ii ) Inspection results, or
( iii ) Analysis.
( b ) A permittee must carry out the risk elimination and mitigation measures derived from its hazard analysis.
( c ) A permittee must ensure the continued accuracy and validity of its hazard analysis throughout the term of its permit.
§ 298.65 Requests for extensions of time within which to file reports or for waivers from reporting requirements. ( a ) If circumstances prevent the filing of BTS Form 298-C on or before the due date, a written request for an extension may be submitted. Except in cases of emergency, the request must be delivered to the BTS's Office of Airline Information in writing at least three days in advance of the due date. The request must state good and sufficient reason to justify the granting of the extension and the date when the reports can be filed. If the request is denied, the air carrier remains subject to the filing requirements to the same extent as if no request for extension of time had been made.
( b ) The Office of Airline Information may waive any reporting requirements contained in §§ 298.61, 298.62, 298.63 and 298.64 of this part, upon its own initiative or upon written request from any air carrier if the waiver is in the public interest and the request demonstrates that: ( 1 ) Unusual circumstances warrant such a departure;
( 2 ) A specifically defined alternative procedure or technique will result in a substantially equivalent or more accurate portrayal; and
( 3 ) The application of the alternative procedure will maintain or improve uniformity in reporting between air carriers.
[ER-1399, 50 FR 21, Jan. 2, 1985, as amended by Doc. No. 47939, 57 FR 40104, Sept. 2, 1992; 60 FR 66726, Dec. 26, 1995]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-1026-000]

Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened in this proceeding commencing at 10 a.m. on Thursday, May 11, 2000, at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC, 20426, for the purpose of exploring the possible settlement of the above-referenced docket.

Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).

For additional information, please contact Edith Gilmore at (202) 208-2158.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11774  Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 29.1017 Oil lines and fittings. ( a ) Each oil line must meet the requirements of § 29.993.
( b ) Breather lines must be arranged so that— ( 1 ) Condensed water vapor that might freeze and obstruct the line cannot accumulate at any point;
( 2 ) The breather discharge will not constitute a fire hazard if foaming occurs, or cause emitted oil to strike the pilot's windshield; and
( 3 ) The breather does not discharge into the engine air induction system.
#### § 61.323 [Reserved]