alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 431.55 Payload reentry review. ( a ) In conducting a payload reentry review to decide if the FAA should approve reentry of a payload, the FAA determines whether its reentry presents any issues that would adversely affect U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, would jeopardize public health and safety or the safety of property, or would not be consistent with international obligations of the United States.
( b ) The FAA consults with the Department of Defense to determine whether reentry of a proposed payload presents any issues adversely affecting U.S. national security.
( c ) The FAA consults with the Department of State to determine whether reentry of a proposed payload presents any issues adversely affecting U.S. foreign policy interests or international obligations.
( d ) The FAA consults with other Federal agencies, including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, authorized to address issues identified under paragraph (a) of this section.
( e ) The FAA advises a person requesting a payload reentry determination, in writing, of any issue raised during a payload reentry review that would impede the issuance of a favorable determination to reenter that payload. The person requesting a payload reentry review may respond, in writing, or revise its application.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:** NASA materials for advanced turbineengines: project completion report, project 2
 
v1,pt1|v1, p2|v2,p1|v2,p2|
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:159600, NAS 1.26:159662, NAS 1.26:167993, NAS 1.26:167992
Item Number:0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000971603
November 9, 2018
#### § 406.123 Waivers.

Waivers of any rights provided by statute or regulation must be in writing or by stipulation made at a hearing and entered into the record. The parties must set forth the precise terms of the waiver and any conditions.
§ 1264.106 Complaint. ( a ) On or after the date the Department of Justice approves the issuance of a complaint in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(1), the reviewing official may serve a complaint on the defendant, as provided in § 1264.107.
( b ) The complaint shall state— ( 1 ) The allegations of liability against the defendant, including the statutory basis for liability, an identification of the claims or statements that are the basis for the alleged liability, and the reasons why liability allegedly arises from such claims or statements;
( 2 ) The maximum amount of penalties and assessments for which the defendant may be held liable;
( 3 ) Instructions for filing an answer to request a hearing, including a specific statement of the defendant's right to request a hearing by filing an answer and to be represented by a representative; and
( 4 ) That failure to file an answer within 30 days of service of the complaint will result in the imposition of the maximum amount of penalties and assessments without right to appeal as provided in § 1264.109.
( c ) At the same time the defendant is served with the complaint, he or she shall also be served with a— ( 1 ) Notice to Consent to the Chairperson of the NASA Board of Contract Appeals (BCA), or Designee, as presiding officer;
( 2 ) Copy of this part 1264 of 14 CFR.
[52 FR 39498, Oct. 22, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 599, Jan. 9, 1989]
§ 251.3 Small musical instruments as carry-on baggage. Each covered carrier shall permit a passenger to carry a violin, guitar, or other small musical instrument in the aircraft cabin, without charging the passenger a fee in addition to any standard fee that carrier may require for comparable carry-on baggage, if: ( a ) The instrument can be stowed safely in a suitable baggage compartment in the aircraft cabin or under a passenger seat, in accordance with the requirements for carriage of carry-on baggage or cargo established by the FAA; and
( b ) There is space for such stowage at the time the passenger boards the aircraft.
[No. 28055-8-II.

Division Two.

December 31, 2002.]

#### Taylor United, Inc., *Appellant,*v. The Department of Revenue, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 00-2-00125-5, Christine A. Pomeroy, J., entered November 13, 2001. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Hunt, C.J., and Bridgewater, J.
§ 31.85 Required basic equipment. In addition to any equipment required by this subchapter for a specific kind of operation, the following equipment is required: ( a ) For all balloons: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) An altimeter.
( 3 ) A rate of climb indicator.
( b ) For hot air balloons: ( 1 ) A fuel quantity gauge. If fuel cells are used, means must be incorporated to indicate to the crew the quantity of fuel in each cell during flight. The means must be calibrated in appropriate units or in percent of fuel cell capacity.
( 2 ) An envelope temperature indicator.
( c ) For captive gas balloons, a compass.
[Amdt. 31-2, 30 FR 3377, Mar. 13, 1965, as amended by Amdt. 31-3, 41 FR 55474, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 31-4, 45 FR 60180, Sept. 11, 1980]
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Pulaski Financial Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
registration statements (No. 333-32986, No. 333-84392, No. 333-84515, No. 333-112962, and No. 333-135895) on form S-8 of Pulaski Financial Corp. and subsidiaries (the Company) of our reports dated December 13, 2006, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of September 30,2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended September 30, 2006, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2006, which reports appear in the September 30, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.

Our report with respect to the
consolidated financial statements refers to the Companys adoption of the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Boards Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment,on
October 1,2005.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ KPMG LLP                         
|St. Louis, Missouri December 13,
2006
§ 152.407 Affirmative action plan: General. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each of the following shall have an affirmative action plan that meets the requirements of § 152.409 and is kept on file for review by the FAA Office of Civil Rights: ( 1 ) Each sponsor who employs 50 or more employees in its aviation workforce.
( 2 ) Each planning Agency which employs 50 or more employees in its agency for aviation purposes.
( 3 ) Each state political division, administering a grant under the AADA to develop standards for airport development at general aviation airports, which employs 50 or more employees in its aviation workforce.
( b ) A grantee is in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section, if it is subject to, and keeps on file for review by the FAA Office of Civil Rights, one of the following: ( 1 ) An affirmative action plan acceptable to another Federal agency.
( 2 ) An affirmative action plan for a State or local agency that the covered organization certifies meets the standards in § 152.409.
( 3 ) A conciliation agreement, consent decree, or court order which provides short and long-range goals for equal employment opportunity similar to those which would be established in an affirmative action plan meeting the standards in § 152.409.
( c ) Each sponsor shall require each aviation related activity (other than construction contractors) which employs 50 or more employees on the airport to prepare, and keep on file for review by the FAA Office of Civil Rights, an affirmative action plan developed in accordance with the standards in § 152.409, unless the activity is subject to one of the mechanisms described in paragraphs (b) (1) through (3) of this section.
( d ) Each sponsor shall require each aviation related activity described in paragraph (c) of this section to similarly require each of its covered suborganizations (other than construction contractors) which employs 50 or more employees on the airport to prepare, and to keep on file for review by the FAA Office of Civil Rights, an affirmative action plan developed in accordance with the standards in § 152.409, unless the suborganization is subject to one of the mechanisms described in paragraphs (b) (1) through (3) of this section.
# Official Journal L 303/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 303 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6018 November 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 303

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6018 November 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2017/2104 of 6 November 2017 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe — Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards (UNECE-WP.7) concerning proposals on quality standards for fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2017/2105 of 10 November 2017 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Trade Committee regarding the amendment of Annex XII of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, setting out the list of Colombian procuring entities in accordance with the provisions of Title VI (‘Government Procurement’) | 6 |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2017/2106 of 10 November 2017 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (EUAM Ukraine/2/2017) | 10 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2017/2104 of 6 November 2017 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe — Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards (UNECE-WP.7) concerning proposals on quality standards for fruit and vegetables

1

*

Council Decision (EU) 2017/2105 of 10 November 2017 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Trade Committee regarding the amendment of Annex XII of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, setting out the list of Colombian procuring entities in accordance with the provisions of Title VI (‘Government Procurement’)

6

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2017/2106 of 10 November 2017 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (EUAM Ukraine/2/2017)

10

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### In the Matter of The Trustees of First Methodist Episcopal Church of Whitehall, Appellant; Village of Whitehall, Respondent.

(Argued October 2, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*Robert W. Fisher*for appellant.

*Warren Sears*for respondent.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Henry Epstein*and *Leon M. Layden*of counsel), for State of New York.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
§ 420.27 Launch site location review—information requirements. An applicant shall provide the following launch site location review information in its application: ( a ) A map or maps showing the location of each launch point proposed, and the flight azimuth, IIP, flight corridor, and each impact range and impact dispersion area for each launch point;
( b ) Each launch vehicle type and any launch vehicle class proposed for each launch point;
( c ) Trajectory data;
( d ) Wind data, including each month and any percent wind data used in the analysis;
( e ) Any launch vehicle apogee used in the analysis;
( f ) Each populated area located within a flight corridor or impact dispersion area;
( g ) The estimated casualty expectancy calculated for each populated area within a flight corridor or impact dispersion area;
( h ) The effective casualty areas used in the analysis;
( i ) The estimated casualty expectancy for each flight corridor or set of impact dispersion areas; and
( j ) If populated areas are located within an overflight exclusion zone, a demonstration that there are times when the public is not present or that the applicant has an agreement in place to evacuate the public from the overflight exclusion zone during a launch.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 434 

To provide for a report on the maintenance of Federal land holdings under 

the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2019 

Mr. BRAUN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a report on the maintenance of Federal land 

holdings under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the 

Interior. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON MAINTAINING FEDERAL LAND 

4 HOLDINGS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF 

5 THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. 

6 Not later than 120 days after the date on which the 

7 President submits to Congress the budget of the United 

8 States for fiscal year 2020, the Secretary of the Interior 

9 shall submit to Congress a report that describes— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 434 IS

1 (1) all Federal land holdings under the jurisdic2 tion of the Secretary of the Interior; and 

3 (2) the total cost of maintaining the Federal 

4 land holdings described under paragraph (1) for 

5 each of fiscal years 2017 through 2019, including an 

6 accounting of holdings and expenditures by each 

7 Federal agency with respect to the land holdings. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-11102 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. MARIA JESUS GONZALEZ, also known as Maria Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court f or the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-98-1
Before KING, DeMOSS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * After plead i n g g u ilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to distribution of heroin, M exica n national Maria Jesus G onzalez was s entenced t o 1 6 8 months of imprisonment, followed b y a three-year term o f super v i s e d release. For the first time on appeal, s he contends that the district court erred in ordering her to serve a term of supervised r elease given that she is a deportable alien. She complains that the court failed t o make any findings that U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D October 25, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-11102 Document: 00512419168 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013No. 12-11102

superv i s e d r e lease was necessary for deterrence or protection, as required by U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c). We review t h is newly raised argument for plain error o nly. See United States v. Dominguez-Alvarado , 695 F.3d 3 24, 3 28 ( 5th Cir. 2012). Gonzalez has failed to show any error, plain or otherwise, in c onnection with her sentence of supervised release. Section 5D 1

. 1 ( c ) does not apply where the term of supervised release is required by statute. I n the instant case, the district court was required by statute to impose a three-year term of supervised release as a result of Gonzalez’s conviction for distribution o f h e r o in. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-11102 Document: 00512419168 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
1

2

9

Great Falls

^ 9

3B 3A^Missoula 6

5

4

8B

Billings Bozeman

^ ^ 10

8A " "

7

Map 4

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

Montana Airsheds

Planning Area Boundary

" Non-Attainment Areas

USA Highways 

Rivers

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

Water of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was ^ City developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

July 2011

North Dakota

Montana

South Dakota

Wyoming Ü

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

Air Quality

Non-Attainment Areas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Transmittal of Record to the Court of Appeals

DATE: September 19, 2018 

BK Case: 17-3283 LTS 

Prior USCA Case #: 17-2168 

 

APPEAL FEE PAID: YES _ NO X 

 

CASE CAPTION: In re: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS: YES NO X 

MOTIONS PENDING: YES NO X _ 

 

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY: Javier Mandry Mercado 

APPEAL FROM: Order entered on 7/11/2018 

 

SPECIAL COMMENTS: Copies of original documents. 

 

INDEX OF DOCUMENTS INCLUDED AS THE RECORD ON APPEAL: 

DOCUMENTS: 

 VOLUMES: 

Docket Entries 3489, 3475 I 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed documents contained herein are copies or the original pleadings as 

described above and constitute the record on appeal in the case. 

 

 

 FRANCES RIOS DE MORAN 

 Clerk of the Court 

 S/ Marian B. Ramirez-Rivera 

 Marian B. Ramirez-Rivera 

 Deputy Clerk 

Acknowledgment of Receipt: 

Received By: ________________ 

USCCA #: ________________ s/c: CM/ECF Parties, Appeals Clerk

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3945 Filed:09/19/18 Entered:09/19/18 08:32:16 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10884

TED RADCLIFFE,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CV-172

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ted Radcliffe, Texas prisoner # 707962, requests a certificate of 

appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal, as time-barred, of 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, which he filed to challenge his disciplinary 

conviction for threatening to escape. Radcliffe has also filed a motion for 

judicial notice.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 24, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-10884 Document: 00513206167 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/24/2015
No. 14-10884

2

“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, 

if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” 

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Radcliffe’s motion for an extension 

of time to file a COA motion was not “the ‘functional equivalent’” of a notice of 

appeal. See Bailey v. Cain, 609 F.3d 763, 765-67 (5th Cir. 2010); FED. R. APP. 

P. 3(c)(1). Because Radcliffe did not file a timely notice of appeal, his appeal is 

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Bowles, 551 U.S. at 214.

COA DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

 Case: 14-10884 Document: 00513206167 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/24/2015
#### § 406.7 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 32(a)
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  August 15, 2006

/s/  Robert
    S. Miller, Jr.Robert S. Miller, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief
    Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Auriga Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank R. Greico, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  May
      19, 2008
            /s/
      Frank R. GreicoBy:  Frank
      R. GriecoIts:  Chief
      Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Auriga Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Auriga Laboratories, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request