alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT  32.1  --  CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER OF FIRST CAPITAL
INTERNATIONAL,  INC.,  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
AND  SECTION  1350  OF  18  U.S.C.  63.


I,  Alex Genin, the Chief Executive Officer of First Capital International, Inc.
hereby  certify that First Capital International, Inc.'s periodic report on Form
10QSB  and  the  financial  statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15  U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on  Form 10QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of  First  Capital  International,  Inc.

Date:  November 12, 2004       /s/ Alex Genin
                               Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1

Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Joseph Loggia, certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the "registrant");

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: March 29, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/JOSEPH LOGGIAJoseph Loggia
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 1214 Directorate ID : 2011 - SW - 071 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model EC 155B, EC155B1, SA - 366G1, SA - 365N, SA - 365N1, AS 365N2, and AS 365 N3 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 46 Heli copters in the US Registry. Reason : The actions are intended to prevent accumulation of fuel in an area with electrical equipment or other ignition source, which may lead to a fire . Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 11,154 for drain replacement; Labor per H elicopter ( 16 x $ 8 5 /work- hour for drain replacement) (17 x $85/work- hour for drain replacement for a helicopter with a sixth fuel tank) (1 x $85/work-hour for removal) (2 x $85/work-hour for removal for a helicopter with a sixth fuel tank) $ 1 , 360

$ 1,445 $85 $170 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 12,514 for drain replacement. $12,599 for drain replacement for a helicopter with a sixth tank. $85 for removal. $170 for removal for a helicopter with a sixth tank. Total US Fleet Cost $ Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a signi ficant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Chinh Vuong
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of ProLink Holdings Corp.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on out most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of the internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or the other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael S. BrowneMichael S. BrowneChief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED BY THE
COMPANY AND THAT IS EXTRACTED FROM ITS UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED APRIL, 30, 2000
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                42,492
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         39,607
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                13,663
<DEPRECIATION>                         9,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       106,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                700,656
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                            4,067
<COMMON>                              16,199
<OTHER-SE>                          (614,094)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         106,828
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     187,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    13,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (255,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (255,580)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                        (255,580)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.016)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.013)


</TABLE>
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.1  


 
 

AMENDMENT NO.2
  TO THE
  BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.
  1997 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
  AS AMENDED AND RESTATED ON JANUARY 24, 2000    
    


A.    The
Boston Properties, Inc. 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), as amended and restated on January 24, 2000, is hereby amended, by action of the Board of
Directors of the Company at a meeting of the Board duly called and held on March 4, 2003, as follows: 



        1.     Section
5(c)(i)(B) is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof: 




"No
Option shall be granted pursuant to the provisions of this Section 5(c)(i)(B) after December 31, 2002." 





        2.     Section
5(c)(i)(C) is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof: 




"No
Option shall be granted pursuant to the provisions of this Section 5(c)(i)(C) after December 31, 2002." 





B.    Except
as amended as provided therein, this Plan shall be confirmed in all other respects. 









QuickLinks


AMENDMENT NO.2 TO THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 1997 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN AS AMENDED AND RESTATED ON JANUARY 24, 2000
•V V



### SERVE D MARC H 28 , 201 1

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I NTH EMATTE RO F RUSHMOR EHELICOPTERS , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10GL000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) FAA No . FA A - 201 0 - 002 3 

## SUBPOENA T O TESTIF Y TO : Robert

Lero y Leffer

t 1427FettemianDr . Colorad o Spring s C O 8091 5 A t th e reques t

o f th e Federa l Aviatio nAdministration , Chri s G . Zurales , Senio r

Attorne y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Great Lake s Region , AGL-7 K 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenue , Des Plaines , I L6001 8 Phone : (847)294-7713 ; Fax : (847 ) 294-749 8 Yo u ar e hereb y require dt o appear a s follows : When : Apri l 27,2 8 an d29,201 1 Where : Conferenc e Room , B16 , Unite dState s Courthouse , 51 5 Nint hStreet , Roo m244 , Rapi dCity , S D 5770 1 T o testif y i nth e matte r

captione dabove .^ >



### Counse l for

th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n shal l coordinat e wit hResponden t an dth e witnes s i n orde r

t o minimiz e th e incQiiyenienc e t o th e witness . Th e cour t wil l accommodate th e witness ' sch^did^f&llftlliSHiit e hi s testimony .

loodAJw n U.S . Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachment-Servic e Lis t

### r FA A Docke t No . CP10GL000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Michae l Jacob , Responden t Presiden t o r CE O Rushmor e Helicopters , Inc . 2456 4 Highway 16/38 5 Custer , S D 5773 0 Chri s G . Zurales , Complainant' s Counse l Great Lake s Region , AGL- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e Des Plaines , I L60018-469 6 ,TEL : 847-294-771 3 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , use th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S . W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430.
#### WALKER FEED & GROCERY CO. v. WHITE, ET AL.

(Decided November 23, 1915.)

Appeal from Cullman Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. R. C. Brickell.

A. A. Griffith, for appellant. F. E. St. John, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 61.4 Qualification and approval of flight simulators and flight training devices. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, each flight simulator and flight training device used for training, and for which an airman is to receive credit to satisfy any training, testing, or checking requirement under this chapter, must be qualified and approved by the Administrator for— ( 1 ) The training, testing, and checking for which it is used;
( 2 ) Each particular maneuver, procedure, or crewmember function performed; and
( 3 ) The representation of the specific category and class of aircraft, type of aircraft, particular variation within the type of aircraft, or set of aircraft for certain flight training devices.
( b ) Any device used for flight training, testing, or checking that has been determined to be acceptable to or approved by the Administrator prior to August 1, 1996, which can be shown to function as originally designed, is considered to be a flight training device, provided it is used for the same purposes for which it was originally accepted or approved and only to the extent of such acceptance or approval.
( c ) The Administrator may approve a device other than a flight simulator or flight training device for specific purposes.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 61-103, 62 FR 40895, July 30, 1997]
#### M. E. Gillett and D. C. Gillett, Partners as Gillett & Son, *Appellants,*v. Harrison T. Beachman, *Appellee.*

A decree will not be reversed as being against the evidence and , because no replication was filed, wben ample evidence to support the decree was filed by consent.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*439*E. R.*Guriby, for Appellants;

*F. M.*Simonton, for Appellee. •

Whitfield, C. J.

— Beachman agreed to sell Gillett & Son 2-8 interest in the Schooner “Brazos” at any time within a year from April, 1906, ,for $3,250.00, without interest. On December 4, 1906, Gillett & Son wired Beacham to know if he would accept $3,250.00 and interest for his 2-8 interest in the Schooner. Beacham replied that he would accept $3,250.00 for his % interest in the Schooner, but was entitled to his dividends on his earnings of the Schooner. Gillett & Son remitted $3,401.60 to Beacham, and Beacham sent them a bill of sale for his interest in the vessel, and at the same time protested that he was entitled to more as dividends. Finally suit was brought by Beacham against Gillett & Son for an accounting as to profits due him for the period from April, 1906, to December, 1906, when Beacham conveyed his interest in the vessel to Gillett & Son. The defense set up is that the acceptance of the $3,401.60 remitted to Beacham and the conveyance of his interest in the vessel to Gillett & Son constituted a new contract resulting in a conveyance of Beacham’s interest in the Schooner, including dividends due to him to the daté of the conveyance. This is not borne out by the evidence. The correspondence shows that Beacham did not expressly or impliedly relinquish his claim to dividends.

The decree in favor of Beacham is founded on statements filed by consent. It is contended that an error was made in allowing Beacham credit for insurance premiums paid on the vessel, but this is not sustained since Gillett & Son remitted $3,401.60 to Beacham, being $151.60 over the $3,250.00, due as the agreed purchase price, and this *440$151.60 is $28.48 in excess of the $123.12 paid by Beacham for insurance premiums, and the $28.48 was deducted from the $746.26 found to be due to Beacham by the statements filed by consent, leaving $717.78, the amount for which the decree was rendered. It was not Suggested in the Circuit Court that the insurance premium was not a proper charge against the vessel.

The defendants, appellants here, cannot complain that no replication was filed when the evidence in support of the bill of complaint was filed by consent, and sustains the decree.

The decree is affirmed.

Taxlor, Shackleford, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.
[No. 27049-8-II.

Division Two.

October 18, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Scott Eugene Hickey, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 00-1-01564-0, John F. Nichols, J., entered February 16, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Bridgewater, JJ.
##### 





EXHIBIT 32(b)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Alan S. Dawes, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ ALAN S. DAWES      
| |                        
| | Alan S. Dawes          
| | Vice Chairman and      
| | Chief Financial Officer

October 16, 2003
#### § 389.24 Foreign air carriers.

A foreign air carrier, or such carriers, if from the same country, acting jointly, may apply for a waiver of the requirements of this part based on reciprocity for U.S. air carriers contained in the requirement of their home governments, or as provided in a treaty or agreement with the United States. To apply for a waiver under this section, foreign air carriers shall send waiver requests to the Director, Office of International Aviation. The request should include applicable official government rules, decisions, statements of policy, or comparable evidence concerning filing fees for U.S. air carriers, or for all carriers serving that country. Once a waiver has been granted for a specific country, no further waiver applications need be filed for that country.
§ 297.22 Procedure on receipt of registration application. After review of a registration form filed under § 297.20, the Department will take one or more of the following actions: ( a ) Indicate by stamp on OST Form 4506 the effective date of registration, and return to the carrier the duplicate copy of OST Form 4506 as evidence of registration with the Department under this part;
( b ) Reject an application for registration for failure to comply with this part, for reasons relating to the failure of effective reciprocity, or if the Department finds that it is in the public interest to do so.
( c ) Request additional information from the applicant;
( d ) Issue an order subjecting a carrier's exercise of authority under this part to such terms, conditions, or limitations as may be required by the public interest; or
( e ) Institute a proceeding under section 41302 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII.
[ER-1159, 44 FR 69635, Dec. 4, 1979, as amended by ER-1294, 47 FR 19685, May 7, 1982; Doc. No. 47939, 57 FR 40103, Sept. 2, 1992; 60 FR 43527, Aug. 22, 1995; DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15934, Apr. 16, 2019]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2937-2938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-160-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

January 7, 2000.
    Take notice that on January 5, 2000, Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (ESNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets in the above 
captioned docket bear a proposed effective date of February 1, 2000.
    ESNG states that the purpose of this instant filing is to track 
rate changes attributable to a storage service purchased from Columbia 
Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) under its Rate Schedules FSS 
and SST.

[[Page 2938]]

The costs of the above referenced storage service comprise the rates 
and charges payable under ESNG's Rate Schedule CFSS. This tracking 
filing is being made pursuant to Section 3 of ESNG's Rate Schedule 
CFSS.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1186 Filed 1-18-00:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT-99.2

  OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.17 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                        AGREEMENT DATED AS OF May 1, 1998


                          BA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                       MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 1998-2


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. as
successor in interest to Bank of America, FSB, the Master Servicer in connection
with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1998-2, do hereby certify that
(i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of its performance under the pooling and servicing agreements,
including this Agreement, has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled in all
material aspects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                    By:  /s/ Robert S. O'Neill
                                       -------------------------------------
                                         Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                         Title: Senior Vice President