alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 34.11 Standard for fuel venting emissions. ( a ) No liquid fuel venting emissions shall be discharged into the atmosphere from any new or in-use aircraft gas turbine engine subject to the subpart. This paragraph is directed at the elimination of intentional discharge to the atmosphere of fuel drained from fuel nozzle manifolds after engines are shut down and does not apply to normal fuel seepage from shaft seals, joints, and fittings.
( b ) Conformity with the standard set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall be determined by inspection of the method designed to eliminate these emissions.
( c ) As applied to an airframe or an engine, any manufacturer or operator may show compliance with the liquid fuel venting and emissions requirements of this section that were effective beginning February 1, 1974 or January 1, 1975, by any means that prevents the intentional discharge of fuel from fuel nozzle manifolds after the engines are shut down. Acceptable means of compliance include one of the following: ( 1 ) Incorporation of an FAA-approved system that recirculates the fuel back into the fuel system.
( 2 ) Capping or securing the pressurization and drain valve.
( 3 ) Manually draining the fuel from a holding tank into a container.
[Docket No. 25613, 55 FR 32861, Aug. 10, 1990, as amended by Amdt. No. 34-7, 89 FR 31087, Apr. 24, 2024]
Exhibit 32.1 IDEAEDGE, INC. CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350
(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection with the Annual Report of IdeaEdge, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Collas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  December 29, 2010/s/ James CollasJames CollasChief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Knot, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Liu, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            the Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




By:
                    /s/ DavidLiuDavid
      Liu
                      Chairman
      and Chief Executive
Officer




Date:
March 13, 2009
Exhibit 21.1



WatchGuard Technologies, Inc.



Subsidiaries



|1. |  | WatchGuard Technologies Australia PTY, Ltd.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------



|2. |  | WatchGuard Technologies Japan, K.K.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------



|3. |  | WatchGuard Technologies Brazil, Ltda.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------



|4. |  | WatchGuard Technologies France
|-- |  | ------------------------------



|5. |  | WatchGuard Technologies Germany GmbH
|-- |  | ------------------------------------



|6. |  | RapidStream, Inc.
|-- |  | -----------------
#### HAWKINS v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 15, 1916.)

Appeal from Shelby Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Hugh D. Merrill.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. "Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

Appeal dismissed on authority of *Sanders v. State, infra,*70 South. 949.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-84081) pertaining to the WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. 1999
Stock Purchase Plan and the WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive
Compensation Plan of our report dated February 4, 2000, with respect to the
financial statements and schedule of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle, Washington
February 11, 2000
###### Editorial Note on Part 399

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 399 appear at 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 399.91 Air carrier participation in programs of technical assistance to airlines of less developed countries.

This policy shall apply to proceedings under 49 U.S.C. 41309 in which the Department is required to make any determination as to the public interest or consistency with 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII of any agreement or relationship sought to be entered into by an air carrier, or officer or director thereof, with a foreign airline in connection with the performance of some activity pursuant to a technical assistance contract financed by an agency of the U.S. Government.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15948, Apr. 16, 2019]
#### Dora Wolfson, Appellant, *v.*Walter Scott et al., Respondent. Jacob Wolfson, Appellant, *v.*Walter Scott et al., Respondents.

(Submitted November 16, 1936;

decided November 18, 1936.)

*W. H. Williamson*for motions.

No one opposed.

Motions granted and appeals dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, unless appellants file and serve undertakings on appeal and pay ten dollars costs within ten days, in which event the motions are denied.
Exhibit 23 to 2009 10-K

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements:



| |  |  | Form S-8 No. 333-66992 pertaining to the Geneva Technology Limited Unapproved Share Option Scheme 1998,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8 No. 333-69633 pertaining to the Convergys Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8 No. 333-86137 pertaining to the Convergys Corporation Canadian Employee Share Purchase Plan,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8 No. 333-96727 pertaining to the Convergys Corporation 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan,
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8 No. 333-96729 pertaining to the Convergys Corporation Deferred Compensation and LTIP Award Deferral Plan for Non-Employee Directors,
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8 No. 333-96733 pertaining to the Convergys Corporation Retirement and Savings Plan,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-3 No. 333-150856 pertaining to Convergys Corporations shelf registration statement for the possible registration of debt securities;
and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-4 No. 333-161586 pertaining to Convergys Corporations registration of $125 million of junior subordinated convertible debentures and
related prospectus for the registration of junior subordinated convertible debentures and common shares.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports
dated February 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Convergys Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Convergys Corporation, included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|Cincinnati, Ohio     
|February 26, 2010
§ 217.9 Waivers from reporting requirements. ( a ) A waiver from any reporting requirement contained in Schedule T-100(f) may be granted by the Department upon its own initiative, or upon the submission of a written request of the air carrier to the Director, Office of Airline Information, when such a waiver is in the public interest.
( b ) Each request for waiver must demonstrate that: Existing peculiarities or unusual circumstances warrant a departure from the prescribed procedure or technique; a specifically defined alternative procedure or technique will result in substantially equivalent or more accurate portrayal of the operations reported; and the application of such alternative procedure will not adversely affect the uniformity in reporting applicable to all air carriers.
[53 FR 46294, Nov. 16, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 66722, Dec. 26, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 1251
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1251 appear at 81 FR 3709, Jan. 22, 2016.

§ 1251.560 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with disabilities an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with disabilities.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used to communicate with persons with impaired hearing.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 1251.560 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
§ 298.53 Suspension or revocation of authority. A Commuter Air Carrier Authorization may be suspended or revoked if any of the following occur: ( a ) The operator fails to maintain insurance coverage as required by part 205 of this chapter for commuter operations;
( b ) The scheduled passenger authority under the operator's Air Carrier Certificate is suspended or revoked by the Federal Aviation Administration;
( c ) The operator does not commence operations for which it has been found fit, or the operator ceases those operations as provided in § 204.7 of this chapter;
( d ) The Department finds that the carrier is not fit, willing, and able to conduct scheduled service or fails to qualify as a citizen of the United States; or
( e ) The Department determines that it is otherwise in the public interest to do so.
II 

Calendar No. 349 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 434 

To provide for a report on the maintenance of Federal land holdings under 

the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2019 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself, Mr. HOEVEN, and Ms. MCSALLY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 17, 2019 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, with an amendment and an amendment to the 

title 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To provide for a report on the maintenance of Federal land 

holdings under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the 

Interior. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 434 RS

1 SECTION 1. REPORT ON MAINTAINING FEDERAL LAND 

2 HOLDINGS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF 

3 THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. 

4 Not later than 120 days after the date on which the 

5 President submits to Congress the budget of the United 

6 States for fiscal year 2020, the Secretary of the Interior 

7 shall submit to Congress a report that describes— 

8 (1) all Federal land holdings under the jurisdic9 tion of the Secretary of the Interior; and 

10 (2) the total cost of maintaining the Federal 

11 land holdings described under paragraph (1) for 

12 each of fiscal years 2017 through 2019, including an 

13 accounting of holdings and expenditures by each 

14 Federal agency with respect to the land holdings. 

15 SECTION 1. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND ACQUI16 SITION DATA. 

17 The Secretary of the Interior (acting through the Di18 rector of the Bureau of Land Management) shall— 

19 (1) collect centralized data on land acquired for 

20 administration by the Bureau of Land Management 

21 using amounts from the Land and Water Conserva22 tion Fund established under section 200302 of title 

23 54, United States Code, including data on— 

24 (A) the method used for the acquisition; and 

25 (B) the type of interest acquired; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 434 RS

1 (2) not later than 1 year after the date of enact2 ment of this Act, and annually thereafter, submit to 

3 Congress a report describing the information collected 

4 under paragraph (1); and 

5 (3) develop guidance to ensure that land acquisi6 tion data collected under paragraph (1) is entered 

7 correctly and properly coded in the data system of the 

8 Bureau of Land Management. 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to require the 

collection of certain data relating to Bureau of Land 

Management land acquisitions, and for other purposes.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Calendar No. 349 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 434 

A BILL 

To provide for a report on the maintenance of FedSecretary of the Interior. eral land holdings under the jurisdiction of the 

DECEMBER 17, 2019 

Reported with an amendment and an amendment to the 

title 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****An assessment of potentialmining impacts on salmon ecosystems of Bristol Bay, Alaska.**
 
Volumes: One | Two | Three
 
SuDoc Number:EP 1.2:B 77/2/
Item Number:0431-I-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000926270
 
January 12, 2018
#### James S. Graham et al., Respondents, *v.*James B. Fisher et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.

(Submitted September 28, 1936;

decided September 30, 1936.)

*Samuel Okin*for motion.

*Joseph Diehl Fackenthal*and *Bruce E. Grunden*opposed.

Motion denied, with leave to renew on argument of appeal.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128993 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver (47) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, NELLIE SCHULTZ and Justices 

JAMES SCHULTZ, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 128993 

 COA: 252643 
 Wayne CC: 03-314226-NO

HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS, d/b/a 

RIVERSIDE OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of 

December 8, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the 

order was entered erroneously. 

KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave 

to appeal. 

l0221 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2006 

Clerk
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 30, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 30, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0408. GENE LAW, III, v. SHERIFF THEODORE "TED” JACKSON et al.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2020CV341121
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.15 Opportunity for informal settlement.

Any respondent may, at any time in the proceeding, unilaterally submit to Enforcement Counsel written offers or proposals for settlement of a proceeding, without prejudice to the rights of any of the parties. Any such offer or proposal may only be made to Enforcement Counsel. Submission of a written settlement offer does not provide a basis for adjourning or otherwise delaying all or any portion of a proceeding under this part. No settlement offer or proposal, or any subsequent negotiation or resolution, is admissible as evidence in any proceeding.
#### ORDER OF CALANTHE v. ARMSTRONG.

(Decided November 11, 1915.)

Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. S. B. Browne.

C. B. Powell, for appellant. Tompkins & Kirkpatrick, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
Exhibit
99.4








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection
with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) by CGI Group Inc. (the “Company”), the
undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




·
            the Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and·
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Date: December
18, 2009




/s/ R. David
Anderson


R. David
Anderson


Executive
Vice-President and


Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Annual Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), we, Alan D. Gordon, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Shelley Goff, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:April 30, 2009By:/s/Alan D. GordonAlan D. Gordon, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  Date:April 30, 2009By:/s/Shelley GoffShelley Goff, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer