26630 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 89 / Monday, May 8, 2000 / Notices

from the Nevada Test Site, NV in the

possession of the Nevada Operations

Office, U.S. Department of Energy, Las

Vegas, NV which meet the definition of

‘‘sacred object’’ and ‘‘unassociated

funerary object’’ under Section 2 of the

Act.

The 46 cultural items consist of

ceramics, groundstones, bone and glass

beads, stone pendants, projectile points,

white chert, abrader, pestle, chipped

stone, and a bowl.

These 46 cultural items were

recovered in the same vicinities where

Native American burials had previously

been recovered. Consultation evidence

presented by representatives of Western

Shoshone and Paiute tribes indicates

these cultural items are consistent with

funerary objects typically included in

Western Shoshone and Paiute burials.

The 274 cultural items consist of bone

and glass beads, groundstone, projectile

points and fragments, pieces of pottery,

ceramics, obsidian bifaces, white chert,

abraders, basketry, a bowl, a stone knife,

a stone drill, crystals, pipe fragments,

cores, and stone pendants/ornaments.

Consultation evidence presented by

representatives of Western Shoshone

and Paiute tribes indicates these 250

cultural items are specific ceremonial

objects needed by Native American

traditional religious leaders for the

practice of Native American religion by

present-day adherents.

Between 1965-1969, these cultural

items were recovered from several sites

within the Nevada Test site during nonlegally permitted collections by

Frederick Worman, and anthropologist

and biologist with the Los Alamos

National Laboratory and William

McKinnis, an engineer with the

Lawrence Livermore National

Laboratory. These collections also

include cultural items from within the

Nevada Test site given to McKinnis by

other unknown collectors. After 1969,

these collections were curated at the

University of Nevada-Las Vegas until

1983, when they were transferred to the

Desert Research Institute (DRI), a federal

curation facility, in Reno, NV. When the

collections containing these cultural

items were inventoried in 1996, if was

found that there was not any systematic

referencing system, making it difficult to

assign materials to their original

locations within the Nevada Test site.

Based on the above-mentioned

information, officials of the U.S.

Department of Energy have determined

that, pursuant to 43 CFR 10.2 (d)(2)(ii),

these 46 cultural items are reasonably

believed to have been placed with or

near individual human remains at the

time of death or later as part of the death

rite or ceremony and are believed, by a

preponderance of the evidence, to have

been removed from a specific burial site

of an Native American individual.

Officials of the U.S. Department of

Energy have determined that, pursuant

to 43 CFR 10.2 (d)(3), these 274 cultural

items are specific ceremonial objects

needed by traditional Native American

religious leaders for the practice of

traditional Native American religions by

their present-day adherents. Officials of

the U.S. Department of Energy have also

determined that, pursuant to 43 CFR

10.2 (e), there is a relationship of shared

group identity which can be reasonably

traced between these items and the

Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, the

Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the

Chemehuevi Reservation, the Colorado

River Indian Tribes of the Colorado

Indian Reservation, the Duckwater

Shoshone Tribe of the Duckwater

Reservation, the Ely Shoshone Tribe of

Nevada, the Fort Independence Indian

Community of Paiute Indians of the Fort

Independence Reservation, the Las

Vegas Tribe of Paiute Indians of the Las

Vegas Indian Colony, the Kaibab Band

of Paiute Indians of the Kaibab Indian

Reservation, the Moapa Band of Paiute

Indians of the Moapa River Indian

Reservation, the Paiute-Shoshone

Indians of the Lone Pine Community of

the Lone Pine Reservation, and the

Yomba Shoshone Tribe of the Yomba

Reservation.

This notice has been sent to officials

of the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, the

Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the

Chemehuevi Reservation, the Colorado

River Indian Tribes of the Colorado

Indian Reservation, the Duckwater

Shoshone Tribe of the Duckwater

Reservation, the Ely Shoshone Tribe of

Nevada, the Fort Independence Indian

Community of Paiute Indians of the Fort

Independence Reservation, the Las

Vegas Tribe of Paiute Indians of the Las

Vegas Indian Colony, the Kaibab Band

of Paiute Indians of the Kaibab Indian

Reservation, the Moapa Band of Paiute

Indians of the Moapa River Indian

Reservation, the Paiute-Shoshone

Indians of the Lone Pine Community of

the Lone Pine Reservation, the Yomba

Shoshone Tribe of the Yomba

Reservation and the following nonFederally recognized Indian groups: the

Timbisha Shoshone Tribe, the Pahrump

Paiute Tribe, the Las Vegas Indian

Center, the Southern Paiute Tribal

Chairman’s Associated, and the Owens

Valley Board of Trustees.

Representatives of any other Indian tribe

that believes itself to be culturally

affiliated with these objects should

contact Robert C. Furlow, NAGPRA

Program Manager, DOE Nevada

Operations Office, PO Box 98518, Las

Vegas, NV 89193–8518; telephone: (762)

295–0845, fax: (762) 295–1455 before

June 7, 2000. Repatriation of these

objects to the Paiute Indian Tribe of

Utah, the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of

the Chemehuevi Reservation, the

Colorado River Indian Tribes of the

Colorado Indian Reservation, the

Duckwater Shoshone Tribe of the

Duckwater Reservation, the Ely

Shoshone Tribe of Nevada, the Fort

Independence Indian Community of

Paiute Indians of the Fort Independence

Reservation, the Las Vegas Tribe of

Paiute Indians of the Las Vegas Indian

Colony, the Kaibab Band of Paiute

Indians of the Kaibab Indian

Reservation, the Moapa Band of Paiute

Indians of the Moapa River Indian

Reservation, the Paiute-Shoshone

Indians of the Lone Pine Community of

the Lone Pine Reservation, and the

Yomba Shoshone Tribe of the Yomba

Reservation may begin after that date if

no additional claimants come forward.

The National Park Service is not

responsible for the determinations

within this notice.

Dated: April 26, 2000.

Veletta Canouts,

Acting Deparmental Consulting Archeologist,

Deputy Manager, Archeology and

Ethnography Program.

[FR Doc. 00–11378 Filed 5–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–F

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

Notice of Commission Decision Not to

Review an Initial Determination

Amending the Complaint and Notice of

Investigation

[Inv. No. 337–TA–428]

In the Matter of Certain Integrated Circuit

Chipsets, Components Thereof and Products

Containing Same.

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that

the U.S. International Trade

Commission has determined not to

review the presiding administrative law

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’s’’) initial determination

(‘‘ID’’) granting a motion to amend the

complaint and notice of investigation to

withdraw claims 1–11, 32–36, and 39–

48 of U.S. Letters Patent 5,581,782 from

the investigation and to amend the

notice of investigation by adding to the

caption and the text the phrase

‘‘components thereof.’’

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 89 / Monday, May 8, 2000 / Notices 26631

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clara Kuehn, Esq., Office of the General

Counsel, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, SW,

Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone

(202) 205-3012. Hearing-impaired

persons are advised that information on

this matter can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s TDD

terminal on 202–205–1810. General

information concerning the Commission

may also be obtained by accessing its

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Commission ordered the institution of

this investigation on February 4, 2000,

based on a complaint filed by Intel

Corp., of Santa Clara, California

(‘‘Intel’’). 65 FR 7059 (2000). The

complaint named five respondents: VIA

Technologies, Inc., of Taipei, Taiwan;

VIA Technologies, Inc., of Fremont,

California (collectively, ‘‘VIA’’); First

International Computer, Inc., of Taipei,

Taiwan; First International Computer of

America, Inc., of Fremont, California;

and Everex Systems, Inc., of Fremont,

California (collectively, ‘‘FIC’’). Id. The

complaint, as supplemented, alleges

violations of section 337 of the Tariff

Act of 1930 in the importation into the

United States, sale for importation, and/

or sale within the United States after

importation of certain integrated circuit

chipsets and products containing same

by reason of infringement of claims 1–

3 and 15–16 of U.S. Letters Patent

5,333,276, claims 1–4, 10, 15, 22, 27–30,

36–37, 44–45, and 49 of U.S. Letters

Patent 5,740,385, claims 1–12 and 28–

48 of U.S. Letters Patent 5,581,782 (‘‘the

‘782 patent’’), and claims 1–31 of U.S.

Letters Patent 5,548,733.

On March 29, 2000, complainant Intel

filed a motion to amend the complaint

and notice of investigation by deleting

claims 1–11, 32–36, and 39–48 of the

‘782 patent and by adding the phrase

‘‘components thereof’’ to the text and

caption of the notice of investigation.

Respondents opposed the motion to the

extent that it sought to add the phrase

‘‘components thereof’’ to the notice of

investigation. The Commission

investigative attorney supported the

motion in its entirety.

On April 10, 2000, the presiding ALJ

issued an ID (Order No. 6) granting

Intel’s motion, thereby amending the

complaint to delete claims 1–11, 32–36,

and 39–48 of the ‘782 patent, and

amending the notice of investigation to

delete claims 1–11, 32–36, and 39–48 of

the ‘782 patent and add the phrase

‘‘components thereof’’ to the caption

and the text. No party petitioned for

review of the ID.

The authority for the Commission’s

determination is contained in section

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), and in

section 210.42 of the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR

§ 210.42). Copies of the ALJ’s ID and all

other nonconfidential documents filed

in connection with this investigation are

or will be available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, S.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone 202–

205–2000.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: May 1, 2000.

Donna R. Koehnke

Secretary

[FR Doc. 00–11339 Filed 5–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Bureau of Justice Assistance; Agency

Information Collection Activities:

Common Request

ACTION: Notice of information collection

under review; survey of best practices

for hiring and retention of female and

minority law enforcement officers.

The Department of Justice, Office of

Justice Programs, has submitted the

following information collection request

for review and clearance in accordance

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1995. Office of Management and Budget

approval is being sought for the

information collection listed below.

This proposed information collection

was previously published in the Federal

Register on February 28, 2000, allowing

for a 60-day public comment period.

The purpose of this notice is to allow

an additional 30 days for public

comment until June 7, 2000. This

process is conducted in accordance with

5 CFR 1320.10.

Written comments and/or suggestions

regarding the item(s) contained in this

notice, especially regarding the

estimated public burden and associated

response time, should be directed to the

Office of Management and Budget,

Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, Attention: Department of Justice

Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20530.

Additionally, comments may be

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202)

395–7285. Comments may also be

submitted to the Department of Justice

(DOJ), Justice Management Division,

Information Management and Security

Staff, Attention: Department Deputy

Clearance Officer, Suite 1220, 1331

Pennsylvania NW, Washington, DC

20530.

Written comments and/or suggestions

from the public and affected agencies

concerning the proposed collection of

information should address one or more

of the following four points:

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

function of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(4) Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses.

Overview of This Information

(1) Type of information collection:

Extension of a currently approved

collection.

(2) The title of the form/collection:

Survey of Best Practices for Hiring and

Retention of Female and Minority Law

Enforcement Officers.

(3) The agency form number, if any,

and the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection:

Bureau of Justice Assistance, United

States Department of Justice.

(4) Affected public who will be asked

or required to respond, as well as a brief

abstract: Primary: Local Law

Enforcement Agencies. 42 USC 3760

[Sec.510.] Purposes (a)(4) providing

financial assistance to public agencies

and private nonprofit organizations for

demonstration programs, which, in view

of previous research or experience, are

likely to be a success in more than one

jurisdiction.

(5) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond/reply: It is estimated that 800

respondents will complete a 35 minute

nomination form.

(6) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection: The total hour burden to

complete the nominations is 400 annual

burden hours.

If additional information is required

contact: Mrs. Brenda E. Dyer, Deputy