alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF FLORIDA v MCALISTER

Case No. CJAP90-69

Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County

March 21, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Paula C. Coffman, Assistant State Attorney, for appellee.

Stanley Silver, Esquire, for appellant.

Before MICHAEL F. CYCMANICK, Circuit Judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT

The Court has waded through various motions and correspondence filed in this case from the fall of last year to as recent as this afternoon. It has not been a pleasant experience in view of the acrimonious exchanges between counsel and the non-compliance by both sides with pertinent requirements of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure on occasion.

Among other things, I am allowing reinstatement of the Appellant’s Brief and I am also denying the Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss.

*21These decisions leave the record in a state where I could await the filing of the Appellee’s Answer Brief which, I believe, would only unnecessarily extend and delay the ultimate decision in this matter on the merits. I have examined the Brief of Appellant and the Record of Proceedings in the lower court and have determined that the decision of Judge Carter in denying the Motion to Suppress has not been shown to involve reversible error. The decision to make the initial stop based on the Deputy’s determination that a civil infraction had been committed by way of Mr. McAlister attempting to go through the Exxon station as he did, is amply supported by evidence.

The Order Denying the Motion to Suppress is hereby Affirmed. This case is therefore, remanded to the County Court for the defendant to serve the sentence previously imposed.

DONE AND ORDERED at Orlando, Orange County, Florida this 21st day of March, 1991.
Order entered December 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00506-CV

FITNESS EVOLUTION, LP, ET AL., Appellants

V.

HEADHUNTER FITNESS, LLC, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-00529-2010

ORDER

We GRANT appellees James Duggan and Duggan Realty Advisors, LLC’s, unopposed 

third motion for an extension of time to file their brief. We ORDER the brief tendered to this 

Court by appellees on December 3, 2013 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS 

JUSTICE
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**
 
SuDoc Number:
Item Number:
CGP systemNumber:
 
October 23, 2017
Exhibit 31.1

                             CERTIFICATION

     I, Sam DiGiralomo, certify that:

1.    I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q  of  Allstates
WorldCargo,    Inc.;

2.    Based  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any  untrue
statement  of  a  material  fact or omit  to  state  a  material  fact
necessary  to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect  to
the period covered by this report;

3.    Based  on  my  knowledge, the financial  statements,  and  other
financial information included in this report, fairly present  in  all
material  respects the financial condition, results of operations  and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented  in
this report;

4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and   I   are
responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls  and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

    (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
         the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
         made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
         during the period in  which  this  report  is  being prepared;

    (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
          controls and procedures and presented in this report our
          conclusions  about the effectiveness of the  disclosure controls
          and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by this
          report based on such evaluation; and

    (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control  over financial reporting that occurred  during the
          registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
          fourth  fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
          has  materially  affected, or is reasonably  likely  to materially
          affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
          and

5.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I   have
disclosed,  based  on our most recent evaluation of  internal  control
over  financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the  audit
committee   of  the  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or   persons
performing the equivalent functions):

    (a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
           or   operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting
           which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
           ability to record, process, summarize  and report financial
           information; and

    (b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
           other employees who have a significant role in the
           registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

May 16, 2005

/s/ Sam DiGiralomo
President and Chief Executive Officer
STREET IMPROVEMENTS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

June 8, 1898.]

#### Knecht v. Cincinnati (City.)

Notice to Abutting Property Owners Necessary for Street Improvements,

Notice to abutting property owners is necessary to give a municipality jurisdiction to levy an assessment for a street improvement.

The plaintiff in this case sought to set aside the assessment against his property for the improvement of Beeckman street on the ground that he received no notice of the intention to improve, and he had no knowledge of the actual improvement.

*Peck & Shafer,*for plaintiff.

*Corporation Counsel,*contra.

Swing, J.

The question raised in this case was determined in Schmidt v. Elmwood Place, 8 Ohio Circ. Dec., 113. And after hearing the argument in this case, and considering the authorities cited, we adhere to the ruling then made, and judgment will be entered in this case accordingly.
#### LIPSCOMB v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al.

No. 33406.

Jan. 20, 1948.

*188 P. 2d 841.*

Washington & Thompson, of Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

Edgar Fenton, of Oklahoma City and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding brought by petitioner, Alsey Bradford Lipscomb, to review an order denying an award made by the State Industrial Commission in a proceeding in which Goodyear Service Store, the employer, and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company its insurer, were respondents. The order from which the proceeding was prosecuted was entered on the 10th day of November, 1947. The Secretary of the State Industrial Commission certified that a copy of said order was sent to the parties affected on the 12th day of November, 1947.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the proceeding was not filed in this court until December 5, 1947. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. In Hurley v. State Highway Commission, 186 Okla. 79, 96 P. 2d 301, we held that under the provisions of 85 O.S. 1941 §29, a proceeding to vacate an order or award of the State Industrial Commission must be commenced within 20 days after a copy of such award or decision has been sent by the commission to the parties affected.

Since the proceeding was not commenced in time, it must be and is hereby dismissed.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, CORN, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4569 

To modify the boundary of the Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument 

in the State of Arizona, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 

Ms. MCSALLY (for herself and Ms. SINEMA) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To modify the boundary of the Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument in the State of Arizona, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sunset Crater Volcano 

5 National Monument Boundary Adjustment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘‘Federal land’’ 

9 means the approximately 97.71 acres of Forest 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4569 IS

1 Service land identified as ‘‘Proposed transfer from 

2 USDA Forest Service to National Park Service’’ on 

3 the Map. 

4 (2) MAP.—The term ‘‘Map’’ means the map en5 titled ‘‘Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument 

6 Draft Proposed Boundary Adjustment’’, numbered 

7 039/80,053d, and dated March 2020. 

8 (3) MONUMENT.—The term ‘‘Monument’’ 

9 means the Sunset Crater Volcano National Monu10 ment established by Presidential Proclamation 1911 

11 (54 U.S.C. 320301 note; 46 Stat. 3023) and redes12 ignated by section 15 of the Smith River National 

13 Recreation Area Act (Public Law 101–612; 104 

14 Stat. 3222). 

15 (4) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

16 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di17 rector of the National Park Service. 

18 SEC. 3. SUNSET CRATER VOLCANO NATIONAL MONUMENT 

19 BOUNDARY MODIFICATION. 

20 (a) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.—The boundary of 

21 the Monument is modified to include the Federal land. 

22 (b) MAP AVAILABILITY.—The Map shall be on file 

23 and available for inspection in the appropriate offices of 

24 the National Park Service. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4569 IS

1 (c) TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION

2 TO NATIONAL PARK SERVICE.—Administrative jurisdic3 tion over the Federal land is transferred from the Forest 

4 Service to the National Park Service. 

5 (d) ADMINISTRATION.—Subject to valid existing 

6 rights, the Secretary shall administer the Federal land 

7 added to the Monument under subsection (a)— 

8 (1) as part of the Monument; and 

9 (2) in accordance with applicable laws (includ10 ing regulations). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### MONTGOMERY LIGHT & TRACTION CO. v. HILL.

(Decided December 16, 1915.)

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court:

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

' Rushton, Williams & Crenshaw, for appellant. No counsel marked for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed by consent.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amalgamated  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Irwin Gross,  Chief  Executive  and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Irwin Gross
------------------------
Name:  Irwin Gross
Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
       (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Date:  NOVEMBER 15, 2004

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 158.53 Collection compensation. ( a ) As compensation for collecting, handling, and remitting the PFC revenue, the collecting air carrier is entitled to: ( 1 ) $0.11 of each PFC collected.
( 2 ) Any interest or other investment return earned on PFC revenue between the time of collection and remittance to the public agency.
( b ) A covered air carrier that fails to designate a separate PFC account is prohibited from collecting interest on the PFC revenue. Where a covered air carrier maintains a separate PFC account in compliance with § 158.49(c), it will receive the interest on PFC accounts as described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( c ) ( 1 ) Collecting air carriers may provide collection cost data periodically to the FAA after the agency issues a notice in the Federal Register that specifies the information and deadline for filing the information. Submission of the information is voluntary. The requested information must include data on interest earned by the air carriers on PFC revenue and air carrier collection, handling, and remittance costs in the following categories: ( i ) Credit card fees;
( ii ) Audit fees;
( iii ) PFC disclosure fees;
( iv ) Reservations costs;
( v ) Passenger service costs;
( vi ) Revenue accounting, data entry, accounts payable, tax, and legal fees;
( vii ) Corporate property department costs;
( viii ) Training for reservations agents, ticket agents, and other departments;
( ix ) Ongoing carrier information systems costs;
( x ) Ongoing computer reservations systems costs; and
( xi ) Airline Reporting Corporation fees.
( 2 ) The FAA may determine a new compensation level based on an analysis of the data provided under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, if the data is submitted by carriers representing at least 75 percent of PFCs collected nationwide.
( 3 ) Any new compensation level determined by the FAA under paragraph (c)(2) of this section will replace the level identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
[Doc. No. FAA-2006-23730, 72 FR 28850, May 23, 2007; Amdt. 158-4, 72 FR 31714, June 8, 2007]
#### § 5.75 Continuous improvement.

Any person required to have an SMS under this part must establish and implement processes to correct safety performance deficiencies identified in the assessments conducted under § 5.73.

[Doc. No. FAA-2021-0419, Amdt. 5-2, 89 FR 33108, Apr. 26, 2024]
**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Partners 

Host Marriott, L.P.: 

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-61722) on Form S-3 of Host Marriott, L.P. of our report dated February 23, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Host Marriott, L.P. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners’ capital and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003 and the related financialstatement schedule, which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of Host Marriott, L.P. 

 

Our report refers to the adoption by Host Marriott, L.P. of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, *Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets* in 2002. 

 

McLean, Virginia 

March 4, 2004
EXHIBIT 20 Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-22 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc: Exhibit Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-22 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 2
#### § 437.93 Compliance monitoring.

A permittee must allow access by, and cooperate with, federal officers or employees or other individuals authorized by the FAA to observe any activities of the permittee, or of its contractors or subcontractors, associated with the conduct of permitted activities.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

T.B., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-5621

)

N.O., )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed May 17, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Kimberly Todd, Judge.

T. Patton Youngblood, Jr. of the 

Youngblood Law Firm, Saint Petersburg, 

for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
§ 1206.805 Inspector General. ( a ) The Inspector General or designee is responsible for making final determinations under § 1206.701, within the time limits specified in subpart G of this part, concerning audit, inspection and investigative records originating in the Office of the Inspector General, records from outside the Government related to an audit, inspection or investigation, records prepared in response to a request from or addressed to the Office of the Inspector General, or other records originating within the Office of the Inspector General, after consultation with the General Counsel or designee on an appeal of an initial determination to the Inspector General.
( b ) The Assistant Inspectors General or their designees are responsible for making initial determinations under subpart C concerning Office of Inspector General records originating in the Office of the Inspector General, records from outside the Government related to Office of Inspector General records prepared in response to a request from or addressed to the Office of the Inspector General, or other records originating with the Office of the Inspector General, after consultation with the Counsel to the Inspector General or designee.
( c ) The Inspector General or designee is responsible for ensuring that requests for Agency records as specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are processed and initial determinations are made within the time limits specified in subpart D of this part.
( d ) The Inspector General or designee is responsible for determining whether unusual circumstances exist under § 1206.403 that would justify extending the time limit for an initial or final determination, for records as specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( e ) Records as specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section include any records located at Regional and field Inspector General Offices, as well as records located at the Headquarters Office of the Inspector General.
[79 FR 46678, Aug. 11, 2014, as amended at NASA-2019-0005, 84 FR 54779, Oct. 11, 2019]
## NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (NOPR) TECHNICAL

SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD):

Energy Conservation Standards for General Service Fluorescent Lamps and

Incandescent Reflector Lamps

Janu ary 1 2, 2009

U.S. Department of E nergy

**Assistant Secretary** 

**Office of**  **Energy Efficiency**  **and Renewable**  **Energy**

**Building Technologies**  **Program**

**Appliances and**  **Commercial Equipment**  **Standards**

**Washington, DC**  **20585 This**  **Document was**  **prepared for**  **the Department**  **of Energy** 

**by staff**  **members of** 

**Navigant Consulting,**  **Inc., and**  **Lighting Research**  **Center**
National Archives and Records Administration ~--------------------------------------

Office of the Federal Register

MI,P 23 2007

Ms. Nancy Molitor

Regulations Division (AGe-200)

Office of the Chief Counsel

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Dear Ms. Molitor:

The material1istcd in the attachment is approved for incorporation by reference m 14 CFR Part 39_

This approval is contingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by

our staffs. The approval to incorporate by reference this publication(s) is effective on the effective date of your

final rule. If you wish to enforce some other edition of the publication(s) approved, you must:

1. Publish notice of the change in the Federal Register, and amend the

Code of Federal Regulations; and

2. Ensure that a copy of that edition is on file at the Office of the Federal Register; and

3. Notify me In writing of the change.

Smcerely,

,iIJM<tv.1 i,.1AJr,;.t::

fr--

RAYMOND A, MOSLEY

Director of the Federal Register

Federal Register Attorney: ~

Attachment

US mail address: 8601 Adelphi ROild,College Park, MD 2071()-f,001

Office location: 800 Norlh Capitol Street, N'IV, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20002--'1244

Federal Register web sites: htlp:/ Iww\\'.archi,'esgov jfedcraJ-register IInd http:! I'V\VIV.gpOClccess.govI nara
Incorporation by Referellce

Docket No. FAA-2004-19755: Directorate Tdentifier 2004-NM-23-AD,- Amdt. 39-15003; AD 2007-07-03

Boeing Service Bulletin 747- Revision 4-

21A2418

dated November 17, 2005

f)ocket No. FAA-l006-25336: Direclorate Idelllifier 2006-NM-070-AD; Amdl. 39-15002: AD 2007-07-02

Boeing Special Attention

Service Bullelin 737-25-

1545

dated September 8, 2005

Boeing Special Attention

Service Bulletin 737-25-

1548

dated November 22,2005

Boeing Special Attention

Service Bulletin 757-25-

0284

dated November 22. 2005

Special AttentiOll dated November 22. 2005

Service Bulletin 757-25-

0285

Docket No. P:4A-2006-26250; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-I04-AD; Amdl. 39-15001 ..AD 2007-07-01

Boeing

Airbus Service Bulletin A3OO27-6057, exduding

Appendix 1

dated May 17, 2005

Prill led 3/2212007 Page lofl