alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CAIN v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 18, 1916.)

-Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Brown, J.

No bill of exceptions, no error of record. Affirmed.
#### Sobering & Glatz, Inc., Respondent, *v.*American Pharmaceutical Company, Inc., Appellant, and The Chemical Foundation, Inc., Respondent.

(Argued April 29, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*Louis D. Frohlich, Nathan Burkan, Albert T. Scharps*and *Louis Barnett*for appellant.

*Clifton Cooper*and *Fritz v. Briesen*for plaintiff, respondent,

*Maurice Leon*for defendant, respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Louqhran and Finch, JJ.
#### § 31.16 Empty weight.

The empty weight must be determined by weighing the balloon with installed equipment but without lifting gas or heater fuel.

[Amdt. 31-4, 45 FR 60179, Sept. 11, 1980]
#### Israel M. Coleman, Respondent, *v.*Cating Rope Works, Inc., et al., Appellants.

(Submitted October 5, 1936;

decided October 6, 1936.)

*516
      *James Holden*for motion.

*Ulysses S. Adler*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, unless undertaking on appeal is filed and appeal is perfected within ten days, in which event the motion is denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 380

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### §§ 380.21-380.23 [Reserved]
§ 406.137 Intervention. ( a ) A person may file with the Federal Docket Management System and serve on each other party a motion for leave to intervene as party in an adjudication. Except for good cause shown, a motion for leave to intervene must be filed not later than 10 days before the hearing.
( b ) The administrative law judge may grant a motion for leave to intervene if the administrative law judge finds that— ( 1 ) Intervention will not unduly broaden the issues or delay the proceedings, and
( 2 ) The intervener will be bound by any order or decision entered in the action or the intervener has a property, financial, or other legitimate interest that may not be addressed adequately by the parties.
( c ) The administrative law judge may determine the extent to which an intervener may participate in the proceedings.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-8607, 66 FR 2180, Jan. 10, 2001, as amended at 72 FR 68477, Dec. 5, 2007]
#### § 460.47 [Reserved]
+1.00

+60

+40

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1052 PLATE 3

_ fi

rma e/4
>a wae Mia un (ur V 8) + Veh con or V8) +-8in (or VE) I}

eel
Pres \ OZ
=ot=O
N |
SS
=e

6 80 10 20 40 60 80 10 20 40 6 80
Yq x10"° SECONDS

WEIGHTING FACTOR, ¥, FOR SEASONAL-DISTURBANCE CALCULATION
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ARTHUR McHUGH, MARY ANN McHUGH and ATLANTIS COIN & JEWELRY, INC.
, Appellant s ,

v.

PATMARKAT CORPORATION d/b/a J & J AUTO ELECTRIC
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 1355

[ November 2, 2017 ]

Appeal and cross

- appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Meenu T. Sasser , Judge; L.T. Case

No. 50 2012CA018554XXXXMB

.

Andrew A. Harris of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Peter A. Dyson of Metnick, Levy & Dyson, Delray Beach, for appellants

.

Richard A. Sherman, Sr. and James W. Sherman of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale and Anthony P. Corsini of Flanagan & Maniotis, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

L EVINE
, F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 33.47 Detonation test.

Each engine must be tested to establish that the engine can function without detonation throughout its range of intended conditions of operation.
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.401 Applicability.

This subpart contains the specific rules that apply to Department proceedings to enforce the provisions of the Statute, and the rules, regulations, orders and other requirements issued by the Department, as well as the filing of informal and formal complaints. Except as modified by this subpart, the provisions of subpart A of this part apply.

[Docket No. OST-97-2090, 65 FR 6457, Feb. 9, 2000, as amended at 84 FR 15936, Apr. 16, 2019]
§ 49.13 Signatures and acknowledgements. ( a ) Each signature on a conveyance must be signed in a manner acceptable to the Administrator.
( b ) Paragraphs (b) through (f) of § 47.13 of this chapter apply to a conveyance made by, or on behalf of, one or more persons doing business under a trade name, or by an agent, corporation, partnership, coowner, or unincorporated association.
( c ) No conveyance or other instrument need be acknowledged, as provided in 49 U.S.C. 44107(c), in order to be recorded under this part. The law of the place of delivery of the conveyance determines when a conveyance or other instrument must be acknowledged in order to be valid for the purposes of that place.
( d ) A power of attorney or other evidence of a person's authority to sign for another, submitted under this part, is valid for the purposes of this section, unless sooner revoked, until— ( 1 ) Its expiration date stated therein; or
( 2 ) If an expiration date is not stated thereon, for not more than 3 years after the date— ( i ) It is signed; or
( ii ) The grantor (a corporate officer or other person in a managerial position therein, where the grantor is a corporation) certifies in writing that the authority to sign shown by the power of attorney or other evidence is still in effect.
[Doc. No. 7190, 31 FR 4499, Mar. 17, 1966, as amended by Amdt. 49-2, 31 FR 15349, Dec. 8, 1966; Amdt. 49-6, 36 FR 8661, May 11, 1971; Amdt. 49-10, 70 FR 246, Jan. 3, 2005; Amdt. No. 49-11, 87 FR 75711, Dec. 9, 2022]
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.607 Decision by administrative law judge.

The administrative law judge shall issue a decision recommending a disposition of a complaint or request for determination within sixty (60) days after the date of the instituting order, unless a shorter period is specified by the Secretary.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard Wayne, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Crossing PreferredCorporation (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Not applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: August 10, 2006 By: /s/ Richard Wayne       Richard Wayne  *President (Principal Executive Officer)*
26
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*John Fiorenza, Appellant.

(Argued October 14, 1936;

decided December 1, 1936.)

*Henry Klauber*and *Louis Baron*for appellant.

*William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney (Felix C. Benvenga*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O'Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4460 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4460

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to waive certain 
eligibility requirements for a veteran to receive per diem payments for 
       domiciliary care at a State home, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Veterans Homes Domiciliary 
Care Flexibility Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR 
              RECEIPT OF PER DIEM PAYMENTS FOR DOMICILIARY CARE AT 
              STATE HOMES AND MODIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR SUCH 
              PAYMENTS.

    (a) Waiver of Requirements.--Notwithstanding section 1741 of title 
38, United States Code (as amended by subsection (b)), the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs shall modify section 51.51(b) of title 38, Code of 
Federal Regulations (or successor regulations), to provide the 
Secretary the authority to waive the requirements under such section 
51.51(b) for a veteran to be eligible for per diem payments for 
domiciliary care at a State home if--
            (1) the veteran has met not fewer than four of the 
        requirements set forth in such section; or
            (2) such waiver would be in the best interest of the 
        veteran.
    (b) Modification of Eligibility.--Section 1741(a)(1) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended, in the flush text following 
subparagraph (B), by striking ``in a Department facility'' and 
inserting ``under the laws administered by the Secretary''.
    (c) State Home Defined.--In this section, the term ``State home'' 
has the meaning given that term in section 101(19) of title 38, United 
States Code.

            Passed the Senate December 8, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4460

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to waive certain 
eligibility requirements for a veteran to receive per diem payments for 
       domiciliary care at a State home, and for other purposes.
```
ACCEPTED 12-14-00240CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 7/10/2015 8:33:52 AM CATHY LUSK CLERK
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frances Dingfeldt, Respondent, against Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Company, Inc., et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Submitted January 4, 1937;

decided January 12, 1937.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 272 N. Y. 623.)
#### § 375.21 Airmen.

Members of the flight crew of a foreign civil aircraft shall have in their personal possession valid airman certificates or licenses authorizing them to perform their assigned functions in the aircraft and for the operation involved issued or rendered valid by the country of registry of the aircraft or by the United States. No such flight crew members shall perform any flight duty within the United States that they are not currently authorized to perform in the country issuing or validating the certificate.
§ 417.23 Compliance monitoring. ( a ) A launch operator must allow access by, and cooperate with, Federal officers or employees or other individuals authorized by the FAA to observe any of its activities, or of its contractors or subcontractors, associated with the conduct of a licensed launch.
( b ) For each licensed launch, a launch operator must provide the FAA with a console for monitoring the progress of the countdown and communication on all channels of the countdown communications network. A launch operator must also provide the FAA with the capability to communicate with the person designated by § 417.103(b)(1).
#### § 415.8 Human space flight.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76726, Sept. 19, 2024.

To obtain a launch license, an applicant proposing to conduct a launch with flight crew or a space flight participant on board must demonstrate compliance with §§ 460.5, 460.7, 460.11, 460.13, 460.15, 460.17, 460.51 and 460.53 of this subchapter.

[Doc. No. FAA-2005-23449, 71 FR 75632, Dec. 15, 2006]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6582

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JOHN VALENTIN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at New Bern

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 4:11

- cr
- 00114

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : November 19, 2020 Decided: November 23, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
John Valentin, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTOR NEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
John Valentin appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence
reduction under section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018 (“First Step Act”), Pub. L. No.
115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194. Although the court found Valentin eligible for relief, the court exercised its discretion not to reduce his sentence. In so doing, the court accurately described the record; considered Val entin’s new Sentencing Guidelines range, the
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and Valentin’s arguments for a reduction; and explained its reasons for denying the motion. We therefore conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Val entin’s motion, and we affirm the court’s judgment. See
United States v. Jackson , 952 F.3d 492, 497 (4th Cir. 2020) (reviewing decision on First Step Act motion for abuse of discretion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Royal Italian Government, Appellant, *v.*International Committee of Young Men’s Christian Associations, Respondent.

Argued November 24, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*Borris M. Komar*for appellant.

*Raymond M. White*and *Harry A. Bostrom*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. (See 273 N. Y. 509.)

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Americas Power Partners, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report of
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


  /s/ Mark A. Margason
--------------------------
    Mark A. Margason

May 13, 2003
§ 29.1321 Arrangement and visibility. ( a ) Each flight, navigation, and powerplant instrument for use by any pilot must be easily visible to him from his station with the minimum practicable deviation from his normal position and line of vision when he is looking forward along the flight path.
( b ) Each instrument necessary for safe operation, including the airspeed indicator, gyroscopic direction indicator, gyroscopic bank-and-pitch indicator, slip-skid indicator, altimeter, rate-of-climb indicator, rotor tachometers, and the indicator most representative of engine power, must be grouped and centered as nearly as practicable about the vertical plane of the pilot's forward vision. In addition, for rotorcraft approved for IFR flight— ( 1 ) The instrument that most effectively indicates attitude must be on the panel in the top center position;
( 2 ) The instrument that most effectively indicates direction of flight must be adjacent to and directly below the attitude instrument;
( 3 ) The instrument that most effectively indicates airspeed must be adjacent to and to the left of the attitude instrument; and
( 4 ) The instrument that most effectively indicates altitude or is most frequently utilized in control of altitude must be adjacent to and to the right of the attitude instrument.
( c ) Other required powerplant instruments must be closely grouped on the instrument panel.
( d ) Identical powerplant instruments for the engines must be located so as to prevent any confusion as to which engine each instrument relates.
( e ) Each powerplant instrument vital to safe operation must be plainly visible to appropriate crewmembers.
( f ) Instrument panel vibration may not damage, or impair the readability or accuracy of, any instrument.
( g ) If a visual indicator is provided to indicate malfunction of an instrument, it must be effective under all probable cockpit lighting conditions.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-14, 42 FR 36972, July 18, 1977; Amdt. 29-21, 48 FR 4391, Jan. 31, 1983]
§ 65.71 Eligibility requirements: General. ( a ) To be eligible for a mechanic certificate and associated ratings, a person must— ( 1 ) Be at least 18 years of age;
( 2 ) Be able to read, write, speak, and understand the English language, or in the case of an applicant who does not meet this requirement and who is employed outside of the United States by a U.S. air carrier, have his certificate endorsed “Valid only outside the United States”;
( 3 ) Have passed all of the prescribed tests within a period of 24 months; and
( 4 ) Comply with the sections of this subpart that apply to the rating he seeks.
( b ) A certificated mechanic who applies for an additional rating must meet the requirements of § 65.77 and, within a period of 24 months, pass the tests prescribed by §§ 65.75 and 65.79 for the additional rating sought.
[Doc. No. 1179, 27 FR 7973, Aug. 10, 1962, as amended by Amdt. 65-6, 31 FR 5950, Apr. 19, 1966]
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.18

   THIRD AMENDMENT TO NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. LOAN AGREEMENT, SECURITY
             AGREEMENT AND 10% CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

      THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. LOAN AGREEMENT,
SECURITY AGREEMENT AND 10% CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (the "THIRD
AMENDMENT") is made and entered into as of November 14, 2005, by and among
NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "MAKER") and Toucan
Capital Fund II, L.P. (the "HOLDER"). This Second Amendment amends the Note (as
defined below).

                                    RECITALS

A. Section 17.6 of that certain Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. Loan Agreement,
Security Agreement and 10% Convertible, Secured Promissory Note, in the
principal amount of $50,000.00 amended and restated as of July 30, 2004 and
originally issued on March 1, 2004, by and between the Maker and the Holder in
the form attached to this Third Amendment as Exhibit A and as amended by that
First Amendment to Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. Loan Agreement, Security
Agreement and 10% Convertible, Secured Promissory Note in the form attached to
this Third Amendment as Exhibit B and as further amended by that Second
Amendment to Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. Loan Agreement, Security Agreement
and 10% Convertible, Secured Promissory Note in the form attached to this Third
Amendment as Exhibit C (as so amended, the "NOTE"), states that any provision of
such note may be amended or waived in writing by the Holder and the Maker; and

B. The Maker and the Holder wish to amend the Note as provided below.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended to provide that the Maturity Date is
January 17, 2006.

2. All other terms and conditions of the Note shall be unaffected hereby and
remain in full force and effect.

3. This Third Amendment shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the
state of Delaware without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws of
the State of Delaware or any other state.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

                                        1
<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this THIRD AMENDMENT
TO NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. LOAN AGREEMENT, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND 10%
CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE as of the date first above written.

MAKER:

NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

By: /s/ Alton L. Boynton
    --------------------
Name: Alton L. Boynton
Title: President

HOLDER:

Toucan Capital Fund II, L.P.

By: /s/ Linda Powers
    ---------------------------------
      Linda Powers, Managing Director


259036 v2/RE

                                        2
LABARFIELD BRYANT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2499

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 19, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

J. Bradford Stetson, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and M. J. Lord, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris and David 

Campbell, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.