alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T MAY 13, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 7- 14 04 0 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 0 6- 20 59 6- CR-AS G UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us CESAR NAHUM MONTUFAR, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S tate s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e So ut he rnDis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Ma y 13 , 20 09 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, MARCUS an d ANDERSON, Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Eli o Vaz qu ez, ap po in te d c ou ns el forCes ar Nahum Mo ntuf ar i n thi s d ire ct cri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti onof t he ap pe ll an t an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o An de rs v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct .13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s

th atco un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o a rg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andMo ntuf ar’s co nv ic ti on an d se nt en ce ar e AFFIRMED .

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001072293
<NAME> AUDIOGENESIS SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          68,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     74,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,886
<PP&E>                                          29,729
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          288,190
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,149,858
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,255,089)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,959
<SALES>                                        513,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               513,287
<CGS>                                          112,679
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (45,769)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                229,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            229,036
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   229,036
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

#### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

####  

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of NSP Holdings L.L.C. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended April 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David F. Myers, Jr., ChiefFinancial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated:  May 11, 2005 | By:    | /s/  DAVID F. MYERS, JR.                            |   |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | David  F. Myers, Jr.                           |
|                      |   | Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                      |   | Secretary  and Manager                              |
|                      |   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)       |

 

 

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
## ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA# 05-14-01073-CR 

### OFFENSE: 19.04 Warren Ray Patton, Jr. v.The State 

## STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Kaufman 

# H3-/4>

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 422nd Judicial District Court DATE: 01/06/16 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 14-00353-422-F



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS Warren RayPatton, Jr. v.The State 

### STYLE: ofTexas 

# APPZUAHT^ Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# Reverb is/vi/o DATE: JUDGE: 

# A2 \^0/4

^yl^L^^L CCA#: 

# i/a-;& CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 88 / Friday, May 5, 2000 / Presidential Documents 26479

Executive Order 13154 of May 3, 2000

Establishing the Kosovo Campaign Medal

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the

laws of the United States of America, including my authority as Commander

in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, it is hereby ordered

as follows:

Section 1. Kosovo Campaign Medal. There is hereby established the Kosovo

Campaign Medal with suitable appurtenances. Except as limited in section

2 of this order, and under uniform regulations to be prescribed by the

Secretaries of the Military Departments and approved by the Secretary of

Defense, or under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of Transportation with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service

in the Navy, the Kosovo Campaign Medal shall be awarded to members

of the Armed Forces of the United States who serve or have served in

Kosovo or contiguous waters or airspace, as defined by such regulations,

after March 24, 1999, and before a terminal date to be prescribed by the

Secretary of Defense.

Sec. 2. Relationship to Other Awards. Notwithstanding section 3 of Executive

Order 10977 of December 4, 1961, establishing the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and section 3 of Executive Order 12985 of January 11, 1996,

establishing the Armed Forces Service Medal, any member who qualified

for those medals by reasons of service in Kosovo between March 24, 1999,

and May 1, 2000, shall remain qualified for those medals. Upon application,

any such member may be awarded the Kosovo Campaign Medal in lieu

of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal or the Armed Forces Service

Medal, but no person may be awarded more than one of these three medals

by reason of service in Kosovo, and no person shall be entitled to more

than one award of the Kosovo Campaign Medal.

Sec. 3. Posthumous Award. The Kosovo Campaign Medal may be awarded

posthumously to any person covered by and under regulations prescribed

in accordance with the first section of this order.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

May 3, 2000.

œ–

[FR Doc. 00–11532

Filed 5–4–00; 11:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Matthew Ryan Blain, * From the 238th District

 Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CR38072.

Vs. No. 11-12-00212-CR * August 8, 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.a.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Amdocs Limited (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Dov
Baharav, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of his knowledge and belief:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: March 24, 2003

/s/  DOV BAHARAV
---------------------------------------------------------
Dov Baharav
Chief Executive Officer
Amdocs Management Limited
<PAGE>

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Amdocs Limited (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Ron
Moskovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of his knowledge and belief:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: March 24, 2003

/s/  RON MOSKOVITZ
---------------------------------------------------------
Ron Moskovitz,
Chief Financial Officer,
Amdocs Management Limited
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**NA COLA DARCEL FRANKLIN,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 558 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 31st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Al lowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of t his matter.**
Editorial Note on Part 183
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 183.33 Designated Airworthiness Representative. A Designated Airworthiness Representative (DAR) may, within limits prescribed by and under the general supervision of the Administrator, do the following: ( a ) Perform examination, inspection, and testing services necessary to issue, and to determine the continuing effectiveness of, certificates, including issuing certificates, as authorized by the Executive Director, Flight Standards Service in the area of maintenance or as authorized by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service in the areas of manufacturing and engineering.
( b ) Charge a fee for his or her services.
( c ) Perform authorized functions at any authorized location.
(Secs. 313(a), 314, 601, 603, 605, and 1102, Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1355, 1421, 1423, 1425, and 1502); sec.6(c) Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 23140, 48 FR 16179, Apr. 14, 1983, as amended by Amdt. 183-9, 54 FR 39296, Sept. 25, 1989; Amdt. 183-11, 67 FR 72766, Dec. 6, 2002; Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 183-17, 83 FR 9176, Mar. 5, 2018]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Harry H. Lief, Respondent, against A. Walzer & Son, et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

(Argued September 30, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*Jeremiah F. Connor*for appellants.

*Irwin Stern*for claimant, respondent.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Leon Freedman*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with one bill of costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                       103,070
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 38,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                         12,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                  8,164
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                251,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         646,694
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                     4,067
<COMMON>                                       16,199
<OTHER-SE>                                   (415,478)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  251,483
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              187,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              6,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (194,395)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (194,395)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (194,395)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.012)


</TABLE>
§ 450.219 Records. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, a licensee must maintain for 3 years all records, data, and other material necessary to verify that a launch or reentry is conducted in accordance with representations contained in the licensee's application, the requirements of subparts C and D of this part, and the terms and conditions contained in the license.
( b ) For an event that meets any of paragraph (1) through (5) or paragraph (8) of the definition of “mishap” in § 401.7 of this chapter, a licensee must preserve all records related to the event. Records must be retained until completion of any Federal investigation and the FAA advises the licensee that the records need not be retained. The licensee must make all records required to be maintained under the regulations available to Federal officials for inspection and copying.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID ESPINOZA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS.

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-14-00268-CR

Appeal from the

120th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120D03772)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until April 21, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. James D. Lucas, the Appellant’s Attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 21, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of March, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
§ 417.218 Hold-and-resume gate analysis. ( a ) For a launch that involves overflight or near overflight of a populated or otherwise protected area prior to the planned safe flight state calculated as required by § 417.219, the flight safety analysis must construct a hold-and-resume gate for each populated or otherwise protected area. After a vehicle's tracking icon crosses a hold-and-resume gate, flight termination must occur as required by sections 417.113(d)(6).
( b ) The hold-and-resume gate analysis must account for: ( 1 ) *Overflight of a wholly contained populated or otherwise protected area.* A hold-and-resume gate must be a closed, continuous contour that encompasses any populated or otherwise protected area located wholly within the impact limit lines. The hold-and-resume gate must encompass a populated or otherwise protected area such that flight termination or breakup of the launch vehicle while the tracking icon is outside the gate would not cause hazardous debris or overpressure to endanger the populated or otherwise protected area.
( 2 ) *Overflight of an uncontained populated or otherwise protected area.* A hold-and-resume gate must be a closed, continuous contour that encompasses any area in which flight termination is allowed to occur. The hold-and-resume gate must encompass all hazard areas such that flight termination or breakup of the launch vehicle while the vehicle's tracking icon is inside the gate would not cause hazardous debris or critical overpressure to endanger any populated or otherwise protected area.
Yolo-Solano AQMD

Adopted January 13, 2010

(Final Draft December 29, 2009) Reg. II, Rule 2.11, Page 1

RULE 2.11 PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATION

Adopted June 19, 1974

Revised January 13, 2010

INDEX

100 GENERAL

101 PURPOSE

102 APPLICABILITY

200 DEFINITIONS

201 PARTICULATE MATTER

300 STANDARDS

301 REQUIREMENT

400 MONITORING

401 TEST METHODS
Yolo-Solano AQMD

Adopted January 13, 2010

(Final Draft December 29, 2009) Reg. II, Rule 2.11, Page 2

100 GENERAL

101 PURPOSE: The purpose of this rule is to protect the ambient air quality by

establishing a particulate matter emission standard.

102 APPLICABILITY: This rule applies to any source operation which emits, or may

emit dust, fumes, or total suspended particulate matter

200 DEFINITIONS

201 PARTICULATE MATTER: Any material which is emitted as liquid or solid

particles, or gaseous material which becomes liquid or solid particles when collected

at standard conditions.

300 STANDARD

301 REQUIREMENT: A person shall not release or discharge into the atmosphere from

any single source operation, dust, fumes, or total suspended particulate matter

emissions in excess of 0.1 grain per cubic foot of gas at dry standard conditions.

400 MONITORING

401 TEST METHODS:

401.1 The exhaust stack gas velocity shall be determined in accordance with EPA

or CARB Test Method 2.

401.2 The exhaust stack gas moisture content shall be determined in accordance

with EPA or CARB Test Method 4.

401.3 Determination of particulate matter emissions shall be conducted in

accordance with EPA or CARB Test Method 5.

RULE 2.11. Particulate Matter. Except as otherwise permitted by law, no person shall release or

discharge into the atmosphere, from any source, particulate matter in excess of 0.3

grains per cubic foot of exhaust volume as calculated standard conditions.
#### § 305.6 Appearance of witnesses.

Witnesses may be required to appear before any administrative law judge for the purpose of receiving their testimony or receiving from them documents or other data relating to any subject under investigation. Such testimony shall be mechanically or stenographically recorded, and a transcript thereof shall be made and incorporated in the record of the investigation.
#### Isaac Mendelsohn, Respondent, *v.*Joseph Rosenberg, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Submitted March 2, 1937;

decided March 23, 1937.

*Lloyd B. Kanter*for appellant.

*Benjamin Cohen*for respondent.

The order is not a final order affecting a substantial right, and is one made in the exercise of discretion, and is not reviewable by the Court of Appeals. *(Klasko Finance Corp.*v. *Belleaire Hotel Corp.,*257 N. Y. 1; *Geller*v. *Flamount Realty Corp.,*260 N. Y. 346.)

*Per Curiam.*

Although this court allowed the appeal in this cause, it has been called to our attention that the *386order is not appealable. *(Matter of Steinman*v. *Conlon,*208 N. Y. 198; *Hand*v. *Ortschreib Building Corp.,*254 N. Y. 15. See *Jewelers’ Mercantile Agency*v. *Jewelers’ Weekly Pub. Co.,*155 N. Y. 241.) We, therefore, do not pass on the merits but reserve the question until properly before us for review.

The appeal should be dismissed, with costs.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.
180913 SCH ORD RE SOLER BOUGEOIS LIFT STAY VERSION SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF MOTION FOR RELIEF 

FROM STAY AND FOR A RULING THAT A JUDGMENT ON A

CLAIM ARISING FROM THE TAKING OF PROPERTIES WITHOUT JUST 

COMPENSATION IS NOT SUBJECT TO REDUCTION OR COMPENSATION IN BANKRUPTCY

The Court has received and reviewed the Motion for Relief from Stay and for a

Ruling that a Judgment on a Claim Arising from the Taking of Properties without Just 

Compensation is Not Subject to Reduction or Compensation in Bankruptcy (the “Motion”) filed 

by Ismael L. Purcell Soler, Alys Collazo Bougeois and the community of property they compose

(the “Movant”). (Docket Entry No. 3928.) Opposition papers to the Motion must be filed by

September 26, 2018. Movant’s reply papers must be filed by October 3, 2018. The Court will 

thereafter take the Motion on submission, unless a party thereto requests a hearing.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 13, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last four 

(4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico 

Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the 

Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy 

Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as 

Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3930 Filed:09/13/18 Entered:09/13/18 11:51:44 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1