alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 29.967 Fuel tank installation. ( a ) Each fuel tank must be supported so that tank loads are not concentrated on unsupported tank surfaces. In addition— ( 1 ) There must be pads, if necessary, to prevent chafing between each tank and its supports;
( 2 ) The padding must be nonabsorbent or treated to prevent the absorption of fuel;
( 3 ) If flexible tank liners are used, they must be supported so that they are not required to withstand fluid loads; and
( 4 ) Each interior surface of tank compartments must be smooth and free of projections that could cause wear of the liner, unless— ( i ) There are means for protection of the liner at those points; or
( ii ) The construction of the liner itself provides such protection.
( b ) Any spaces adjacent to tank surfaces must be adequately ventilated to avoid accumulation of fuel or fumes in those spaces due to minor leakage. If the tank is in a sealed compartment, ventilation may be limited to drain holes that prevent clogging and that prevent excessive pressure resulting from altitude changes. If flexible tank liners are installed, the venting arrangement for the spaces between the liner and its container must maintain the proper relationship to tank vent pressures for any expected flight condition.
( c ) The location of each tank must meet the requirements of § 29.1185(b) and (c).
( d ) No rotorcraft skin immediately adjacent to a major air outlet from the engine compartment may act as the wall of an integral tank.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34217, Sept. 2, 1988; Amdt. 29-35, 59 FR 50388, Oct. 3, 1994]
§ 29.1195 Fire extinguishing systems. ( a ) Each turbine engine powered rotorcraft and Category A reciprocating engine powered rotorcraft, and each Category B reciprocating engine powered rotorcraft with engines of more than 1,500 cubic inches must have a fire extinguishing system for the designated fire zones. The fire extinguishing system for a powerplant must be able to simultaneously protect all zones of the powerplant compartment for which protection is provided.
( b ) For multiengine powered rotorcraft, the fire extinguishing system, the quantity of extinguishing agent, and the rate of discharge must— ( 1 ) For each auxiliary power unit and combustion equipment, provide at least one adequate discharge; and
( 2 ) For each other designated fire zone, provide two adequate discharges.
( c ) For single engine rotorcraft, the quantity of extinguishing agent and the rate of discharge must provide at least one adequate discharge for the engine compartment.
( d ) It must be shown by either actual or simulated flight tests that under critical airflow conditions in flight the discharge of the extinguishing agent in each designated fire zone will provide an agent concentration capable of extinguishing fires in that zone and of minimizing the probability of reignition.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424), sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 970, Jan. 26, 1968; Amdt. 29-13, 42 FR 15047, Mar. 17, 1977; Amdt. 29-17, 43 FR 50602, Oct. 30, 1978]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4446 

To waive affiliation rules under the paycheck protection program for Tribal 

business concerns with the same employer identification number, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 5, 2020 

Mr. BENNET (for himself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To waive affiliation rules under the paycheck protection program for Tribal business concerns with the same employer identification number, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Business Access 

5 to PPP Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4446 IS

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF AFFILIATION RULES UNDER THE PAY2 CHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR TRIBAL 

3 BUSINESS CONCERNS WITH SAME EIN. 

4 Section 7(a)(36)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 

5 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)(D)) is amended— 

6 (1) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘, veterans organi7 zation, or Tribal business concern’’ and inserting ‘‘or 

8 veterans organization’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(vii) NO AFFILIATION BETWEEN

11 TRIBAL BUSINESS CONCERNS BASED ON

12 SHARED EIN.—During the covered period, 

13 for purposes of determining eligibility for a 

14 covered loan, affiliation shall not be found 

15 under section 121.103 of title 13, Code of 

16 Federal Regulations, or any successor reg17 ulation, between Tribal business concerns 

18 described in section 31(b)(2)(C) based 

19 solely on a shared employer identification 

20 number.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 405.5 Emergency orders. The Associate Administrator may immediately terminate, prohibit, or suspend a licensed or permitted launch, reentry, or operation of a launch or reentry site if the Associate Administrator determines that— ( a ) The licensed or permitted launch, reentry, or operation of a launch or reentry site is detrimental to public health and safety, the safety of property, or any national security or foreign policy interest of the United States; and
( b ) The detriment cannot be eliminated effectively through the exercise of other authority of the Office.
[53 FR 11014, Apr. 4, 1988, as amended by Amdt. 405-1, 65 FR 56657, Sept. 19, 2000; Amdt. 405-3, 72 FR 17017, Apr. 6, 2007]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6989
ROBERT JERRY SMITH, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-00-2983-9-10) Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 2, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Jerry Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Molony Condon, Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Jerry Smith, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional” right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). As to claims dismissed by a district court solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Smith has not satisfied either standard. See Smith v. Catoe , No. CA-00-2983-9-10 (D.S.C. May 29, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2



I, William P. Eckman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter ( the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2003 |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |
MECHANIC’S LIENS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

1899.]

King, Haynes and Parker, JJ. (Of the Sixth Circuit sitting in Hamilton county.)

#### Frank Fox v. Wunker & Rehsteiner.

1. Failure of Contractor to Contest Precludes Defense.

Failure of a contractor to proceed within the statutory time to contest a mechanic’s lien obtained against him, precludes the defense, at a later date, that the fund arose from other material.

2. Sod Is Material.

Sod furnished for a public park is material that can be protected by lien.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

*Symmes & Fox,*for plaintiff in error.

*Goebel & Betthiger,*for the material men.

King, J.

Wunker & Rehsteiner furnished six acres of sod, at an agreed price of $65 per acre, to A. Yaeger, a city contractor, for grading, etc., in Eden Park. The sum of $160 remaining due to them from Yaeger, the plaintiffs filed with the board of administration an itemized statement of their account with Yaeger, with all credits thereon, and at the same time filed a sworn copy of said account with the county recorder. Yaeger filed with the board an affidavit disputing said account, but did not comply with the provisions of law for arbitrating said claim or adjusting it by a suit in court. Some weeks later he assigned his claim to the present plaintiff, who answered, in the suit by the sod men against the city for recovery of the amount due them, that the lien obtained by them included money due to Yaeger ior material furnished under other contracts and in other places than Eden Park, which had no connection with the creation of the fund attempted to be held herein. The court below sustained the lien of the firm furnishing the sod.

Held — 1. That plaintiff in error, as assignee of one Yaeger, a contractor, acquired by assignment and had only such rights as Yaeger, the assignor, had at the time of the assignment. That by the statute on mechanic’s liens Yaeger was precluded from disputing the amount or validity of Wunker & R.hesteiner’s lien and claim by his failure to proceed under the statute, secs. 3199 and 3200, to contest it, hence his assignee Fox, is precluded here from contesting it.

2. Sod furnished to a public park is material furnished for “ the construction, improvement or repair of a * * * public improvement,” within the meaning of see. 3193, Rev. Stat.

Wherefore the court of common pleas did not err in itsjudgments on the several demurrers filed in that court, and the judgment is affirmed.
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                        National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Non-Mammalian Organisms as Models for Anticancer Drug Discovery.                    

*Date:*                        February 2, 2000.                    

*Time:*                        8 AM to 5 PM.                        Start Printed Page 2969

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                        Executive Plaza North-Conference Room F, 6130 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                        Timothy C. Meeker, Scientific Review Administrator, Special Referral and Resources Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8088, Rockville, MD 20852, 301/594-1279.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 6, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-1129 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 135.353 [Reserved]
.P-o-ft&y 1130$

Ci\n you, fiUof-c vp&4c t^ CM ^y op^/ fU*^ U C^)J fisnc/scle, / 4

C^eftUt

-Z^f, /£///• /^^ # n?&oy

RECEIVED IN

COUBTOFCRIMIMAI APPEALS

SEP 01 21^
exv10w7







EXHIBIT 10.7




CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED: Certain portions of this
document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential
treatment and, where applicable, have been marked with an asterisk ("[****]")
to denote where omissions have been made. The confidential material has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




EVERGREEN SOLAR, INC.




Amendment dated on or about August 5, 2009




to Master Supply Agreement with




IBC Solar AG, dated July 14, 2008



The following prices shall be effective [****]:





	 	•	 	For [****] Product: €[****]
	 
	 	•	 	For [****] Product: €[****]





	 	 	 
	Evergreen Solar, Inc.

	 	IBC Solar AG
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 1 of 12Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 2 of 12Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 3 of 12Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 4 of 12Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 5 of 12Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 6 of 12Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 7 of 12Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 8 of 12Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 9 of 12Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 10 of 12Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 11 of 12Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-1 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Act # 196 Page 12 of 12
§ 125.133 Fuel valves. Each fuel valve must— ( a ) Comply with § 125.155;
( b ) Have positive stops or suitable index provisions in the “on” and “off” positions; and
( c ) Be supported so that loads resulting from its operation or from accelerated flight conditions are not transmitted to the lines connected to the valve.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of NT Holding Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Chun Ka Tsun, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: November 14, 2006   /S/ Chun Ka Tsun ---------------- Chun Ka Tsun Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40375 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE GONZALEZ-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-693-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Gonzalez-Gutierrez appeals his illegal reentry conviction. Gonzalez’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Gonzalez contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-TorresNo. 05-40375 -2- remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Gonzalez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,276
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,276
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,250
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,023
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,003
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,276
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,724
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,724)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,724)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (30,724)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraSite, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Stephen H. Clark, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                   |  |                        
|September 25, 2003 |  | /s/ STEPHEN H. CLARK   
|                   |  |                        
|                   |  |                        
|                   |  | Stephen H. Clark       
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer