alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP99-507-000]

                    Pursuant to the Commission's order in                     *Amoco Energy Trading Corporation et al*                     v.                     *El Paso Natural Gas Company,*                     89 FERC ¶ 61,165 (1999), Commission Staff held a Technical Conference on March 9, 2000, to discuss El Paso's February 9, 2000 proposal to change its current allocation methods and all issues related to the allocation of receipt and delivery points on El Paso's system.                

At a subsequent technical conference, the participants reached consensus to attend an informal settlement conference. The participants also agreed that the Director of the Commission's Dispute Resolution Service (Director) attend the conference to facilitate the settlement negotiations. The parties also agreed that a party could provide to the Director, in advance of the informal settlement conference, a statement of the issues or business interests that they believed needed to be considered. Accordingly, the informal settlement conference will begin with a discussion regarding the settlement process, followed by a discussion of the statements provided to the Director.

The informal settlement conference will be held on May 16, 2000, at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission located at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC. The conference will begin at 10 a.m. in Room 3M-2A/2B.

                    All interested parties in the above dockets are requested to attend the informal settlement conference. If a party has any questions with respect to the conference, please call Richard Miles, the Director of the Dispute Resolution Service. His telephone number is 1-877 FERC ADR (337-2237) or 202-208-0702 and his e-mail address is                     *richard.miles@ferc.fed.us.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11936  Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Second Amendment - Sienna Bay



Exhibit 10.87

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE CONTRACT FOR SIENNA
BAY

 

           
This Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Contract (this
“Amendment”) is made as of November 10, 2009 between CCIP/3 SANDPIPER,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Seller") and DT GROUP
DEVELOPMENT, INC., a California Corporation (“Purchaser”).

W I T N E S S E T H:

           
WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser entered into that certain Purchase and Sale
Contract, dated as of August 14, 2009, as amended by that certain First
Amendment to Purchase and Sale Contract for Sienna Bay dated as of October 8,
2009, with respect to the sale of certain property described therein (the
“Contract”); and

           
WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser desire to amend certain provisions of the
Contract as hereinafter set forth.

           
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein
contained, the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the
mutual receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereby agree as follows:

1.     
Capitalized Terms.     Capitalized terms used
in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Contract, except
as expressly otherwise defined herein.

2.     
Extension of the Loan Assumption Approval Period.  Seller and
Purchaser hereby agree that the Loan Assumption Approval Period is extended to
November 12, 2009.

3.     
Adjournment of Closing Date. Seller and Purchaser hereby agree
that the Closing Date is adjourned to November 16, 2009.

4.     
Miscellaneous.          
This Amendment (a)  supersedes all prior oral or written communications
and agreement between or among the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof, and (b) may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute a
single instrument and may be delivered by facsimile transmission, and any such
facsimile transmitted Amendment shall have the same force and effect, and be as
binding, as if original signatures had been delivered.  As modified hereby,
all the terms of the Contract are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall
continue in full force and effect.

[Signature Page Follows]


           
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date and year hereinabove written.

 

Seller:

 

CCIP/3
SANDPIPER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

 

By:
   CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/3, LP, a Delaware
limited partnership, its member

 

By:   
CONCAP EQUITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, its general partner 

 

 

By: 
/s/Trent A. Johnson

Name: 
Trent A. Johnson

Title: 
Vice President

 

Purchaser:

DT
GROUP DEVELOPMENT, INC, a California
corporation

 

By: 
/s/Dan Markel 
Name:  Dan Markel
Title:  President &
CEO
Rimage Corporation
 7725 Washington Avenue South
 Minneapolis, MN 55439  USA
 www.rimage.com

 

ph: 952.944.8144
 fax: 952.944.7808
 





 


Exhibit 10.1


November 4, 2009


 


Mr. Sherman Black


[address]


[address]


 


Dear Sherman:


 


I am pleased to confirm the Board’s decision today to appoint you as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and to elect you to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of Rimage effective January 1, 2010.  In connection with your promotion to Chief Executive Officer, you will receive the following:


 





	
2010 Base Salary:
 	
$375,000 on an annualized basis, effective January 1, 2010
 






 





	
2010 Bonus Opportunity:
 	
60% of Base Salary 
 






 





	
Stock Options:
 	
50,000 option shares, issued on January 1, 2010, vesting in equal amounts over four years 
 






 


All of the other terms and conditions of your employment will remain in place without change. 


 


Sherman, since you joined Rimage in early 2009, you have demonstrated your leadership and executive capabilities.  You have the full confidence of the Rimage Board as you assume your new role as Chief Executive Officer.  We look forward to the future of Rimage under your leadership.


 





	
Sincerely,
 
	
 
 
	
/s/  James L. Reissner
 
	
 
 
	
James L.
Reissner
 
	
Chairman of the Board 
 





 





	
 
 	
Accepted and Agreed to: 
 
	
 
 	
 
 
	
 
 	
 
 
	
 
 	
 
 
	
Dated: November 4, 2009
 	
/s/  Sherman Black
 
	
 
 	
Sherman Black
§ 420.1 General. ( a ) *Scope.* This part prescribes the information and demonstrations that must be provided to the FAA as part of a license application, the bases for license approval, license terms and conditions, and post-licensing requirements with which a licensee shall comply to remain licensed. Requirements for preparing a license application are contained in part 413 of this subchapter.
( b ) *Equivalent level of safety.* Each requirement of this part applies unless the applicant or licensee clearly and convincingly demonstrates that an alternative approach provides an equivalent level of safety to the requirement of this part.
[Doc. No. FAA-2016-6761, Amdt. No. 420-8, 83 FR 28535, June 20, 2018]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERDENT,
INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND 1999,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             951                     539
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,805                  20,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,632                   4,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,678                  38,432
<PP&E>                                          31,379                  30,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,965                 241,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,580                  38,965
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,799                   1,796
<PREFERRED>                                     12,090                  12,090
<COMMON>                                            21                      21
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,823                  63,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   250,965                 241,213
<SALES>                                         71,200                  51,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,200                  51,378
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,319                  50,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (1)                      22
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,491)                 (1,351)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,389                   (508)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       556                     191
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       833                   (699)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04                  (0.03)


</TABLE>
#### Bornfriend v. Berman

No appearance for plaintiff.

*Leonard F. Market,*for defendant.

June 13, 1958.

Gerber, J.,

This matter is before the court on certiorari. Under the Act of July 7, 1879, P. L. 194, sec. 2, 42 PS §451, where a defendant has filed an affidavit of defense, a plaintiff must prove his case by sworn testimony before judgment may be entered by default. A judgment entered in violation of this act may be attacked on certiorari even though it has issued more than 20 days after the rendition of the judgment: S. Carl Garner *&*Co. v. Marshall, 58 D. & C. 674 (1946) ; Hilands v. Shade, 63 D. *&*C. 159 (1948).

And now, to wit, June 13, 1958, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the exceptions be sustained, and that the judgment entered in the above case be and is hereby vacated, and further it is ordered that the record be remanded to the office of the justice of the peace for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.
#### Tekla Tuzinska, Respondent, *v.*The Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation, Limited, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

(Argued May 29, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*450
      *Frank G. Raichle*and *Carlos C. Alden*for appellant.

*Robert L. Rice, Jr., Sigismund M. Lopacki*and *George M. Donohue*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Croech, Loeghran and Finch, JJ.
#### § 171.301 Scope.

This subpart sets forth minimum requirements for the approval, installation, operation and maintenance of non-Federal Microwave Landing System (MLS) facilities that provide the basis for instrument flight rules (IFR) and air traffic control procedures.
§ 29.907 Engine vibration. ( a ) Each engine must be installed to prevent the harmful vibration of any part of the engine or rotorcraft.
( b ) The addition of the rotor and the rotor drive system to the engine may not subject the principal rotating parts of the engine to excessive vibration stresses. This must be shown by a vibration investigation.
#### Ivory St. Clair et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Respondent, and Brooklyn Union Gas Company et al., Appellants.

[698 NYS2d 285]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Brooklyn Union Gas Company and New York Paving, Inc., separately appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Bangs County (R. Goldberg, J.), entered April 6,1998, as denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants to the defendant-respondent.

The appellants did not make out a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law because their moving papers did not “demonstrate the absence of any material issue of fact” *(Daniels v Judelson,*215 AD2d 623, 624; *see also, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324). In evaluating whether there are genuine factual issues, if the court has “any doubt as to the existence of a triable issue of fact, the motion for summary judgment should be denied” *(Daniels v Judelson,*215 AD2d, *supra,*at 624; *see also, Rotuba Extruders v Ceppos,*46 NY2d 223).

Although the appellants provided the dates and specific scope of the work they performed at the intersection where the automobile accident in question occurred, neither appellant definitely established whether the exposed manhole cover which caused the accident was within the area of their work. Even if we accept the appellants’ computer records as sufficient evidence that they had completed their work at the intersection prior to the accident *(see, Schneider Fuel Oil v DeGennaro,*238 AD2d 495, 496), this does not dispel doubt as to whether they left the road surface surrounding the manhole in a safe and nondefective condition. Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1: PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Nello Gonfiantini, III, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Specialty Trust, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Nello Gonfiantini III
    
    Dated this 29th day of March 2004Name: Nello Gonfiantini IIITitle : Chairman of the Board, President and Secretary
 111
[J-71-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 24 MAP 2023

V. JEFF DOBSON, Appellee

Appellant Appeal from the Order ofthe Superior Court at No. 2099 EDA 2021 dated June 28, 2022, reconsideration denied August 31, 2022, affirming the Judgment of Sentence entered September20, 2021 in the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, Criminal Division, at No. CP-23-CR-0001612-2019. :ARGUED: November30, 2023 ORDER PER CURIAM DECIDED: January 8, 2024 AND NOW, this 8t"day ofJanuary, 2024, the Court being evenly divided, the order ofthe Superior Court is AFFIRMED. Justice Wecht files an opinion in support of reversal.
#### § 91.1111 Maintenance training.

The program manager must ensure that all employees who are responsible for maintenance related to program aircraft undergo appropriate initial and annual recurrent training and are competent to perform those duties.
# EUR-Lex - 31995R2342 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995R2342

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2342/95 of 4 October 1995 opening invitations to tender for the fixing of aid for the private storage of carcases and half-carcases of lamb in Sweden and Finland **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 05/10/1995 P. 0015 - 0015 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2342/95 of 4 October 1995 opening invitations to tender for the fixing of aid for the private storage of carcases and half-carcases of lamb in Sweden and Finland

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89 of 25 September 1989 on the common organization of the market in sheepmeat and goatmeat (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1265/95 (2), and in particular Article 7 (2) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3446/90 of 27 November 1990 laying down detailed rules for granting private storage aid for sheepmeat and goatmeat (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3533/93 (4), lays down in particular detailed rules on invitations to tender;

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3447/90 of 28 November 1990 on special conditions for the granting of private storage aid for sheepmeat and goatmeat (5), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 879/95 (6), lays down in particular the minimum quantities in respect of which a tender may be submitted;

Whereas the application of Article 7 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89 may result in the opening of invitations to tender for private storage aid; whereas that Article provides for the application of these measures on the basis of the situation of each quotation zone; whereas, in view of the particularly difficult market situation in Sweden and Finland in particular due to adhesion and the opening of their markets to imports, it has been judged opportune to initiate such a procedure;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sheep and Goat Meat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Invitations to tender are hereby opened in Sweden and Finland for aid to private storage for carcases and half-carcases of lamb.

Subject to the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 3447/90 tenders may be submitted to the intervention agency of the Member State concerned.

Article 2

Tenders must be submitted not later than 2 p.m. on 6 October 1995 to the relevant intervention agency.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 October 1995.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 289, 7. 10. 1989, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 123, 3. 6. 1995, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 333, 30. 11. 1990, p. 39.

(4) OJ No L 321, 23. 12. 1993, p. 9.

(5) OJ No L 333, 30. 11. 1990, p. 46.

(6) OJ No L 91, 22. 4. 1995, p. 2.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11023]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3304]


Amendment to Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs Request 
for Proposals: Small Grants Competition; Grassroots Citizen 
Participation in Democracy

SUMMARY: The Office of Citizen Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs of the U.S. Department of State announces the addition 
of Brazil to the Latin American geographic region for which proposals 
will be accepted.
    The Small Grants Competition was announced on April 20, 2000 in the 
Federal Register (Volume 65, pg. 21061). The deadline for proposals is 
June 2, 2000.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Interested organizations should contact Laverne 
Johnson, 202/619-5337; E-Mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#214d4b4e494f524e4f61545248400f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d71777275736e72735d686e747c337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 26, 2000.
Evelyn S. Lieberman,
Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-11023 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>