alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Alfred Gangloff, Appellant.

(Argued November 16, 1936;

decided December 1, 1936.)

*Julius J. Goldstein*for appellant.

*Walter C. Newcomb, District Attorney,*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 10, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Richard WayneRichard WaynePresident (Principal Executive Officer)Date: August 10, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Edward F. MehmEdward F. MehmTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
 28
§ 36.103 Noise limits. ( a ) For subsonic transport category large airplanes and subsonic jet airplanes compliance with this section must be shown with noise levels measured and evaluated as prescribed in appendix A of this part, and demonstrated at the measuring points, and in accordance with the test procedures under section B36.8 (or an approved equivalent procedure), stated under appendix B of this part.
( b ) Type certification applications between November 5, 1975 and December 31, 2005. If application is made on or after November 5, 1975, and before January 1, 2006, it must be shown that the noise levels of the airplane are no greater than the Stage 3 noise limit prescribed in section B36.5(c) of appendix B of this part.
( c ) Type certification applications between January 1, 2006, and the date specified in paragraph (d) or (e) of this section, as applicable for airplane weight. If application is made on or after January 1, 2006, and before the date specified in paragraph (d) or (e) of this section (as applicable for airplane weight), it must be shown that the noise levels of the airplane are no greater than the Stage 4 noise limit prescribed in section B36.5(d) of appendix B of this part. If an applicant chose to voluntarily certificate an airplane to Stage 4 prior to January 2006, then the requirements of § 36.7(f) apply to that airplane.
( d ) For airplanes with a maximum certificated takeoff weight of 121,254 pounds (55,000 kg) or more, type certification applications on or after December 31, 2017. If application is made on or after December 31, 2017, it must be shown that the noise levels of the airplane are no greater than the Stage 5 noise limit prescribed in section B36.5(e) of appendix B of this part. Prior to December 31, 2017, an applicant may seek voluntary certification to Stage 5. If Stage 5 certification is chosen, the requirements of § 36.7(g) will apply.
( e ) For airplanes with a maximum certificated take-off weight of less than 121,254 pounds (55,000 kg), type certification applications on or after December 31, 2020. If application is made on or after December 31, 2020, it must be shown that the noise levels of the airplane are no greater than the Stage 5 noise limit prescribed in section B36.5(e) of appendix B of this part. Prior to December 31, 2020, an applicant may seek voluntary certification to Stage 5. If Stage 5 certification is chosen, the requirements of § 36.7(g) will apply.
[Amdt. 36-54, 67 FR 45212, July 8, 2002, as amended by Amdt. 36-26, 70 FR 38749, July 5, 2005; FAA Doc. No. FAA-2015-3782, Amdt. No. 36-31, 82 FR 46130, Oct. 4, 2017]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Thomas McFarland, Appellant.

(Argued May 22, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*Joseph A. Solovei, Roy R. Richard*and *Joseph Weiss*for appellant.

*William F. X. Geoghan, District Attorney (Edward H. Levine*and *Henry J. Walsh*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Veterinary Pet Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ PAUL W. SOUZAPaul W. Souza,
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30103-30104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. GT00-30-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

May 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2000, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet to be 
effective June 1, 2000:

Third Revised Sheet No. 3B

    Panhandle states that the purpose of this filing, made in 
accordance with the provisions of Section 154.106 of the Commission's 
Regulations, is to revise the system map to reflect changes in the 
pipeline facilities and the points at which service is provided.
    Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public

[[Page 30104]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on 
the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11628 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 792.08 What must I include in my request? Until an Information Center receives your FOIA request, it is not obligated to search for responsive records, meet time deadlines, or release any records. A request will not be considered received if it does not include all of the items in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section. ( a ) Your request must be in writing and include the words “FOIA REQUEST” on both the envelope and request letter. The request letter must also include your name, address and a telephone number where you can be reached during normal business hours. If you would like us to respond to your FOIA request by electronic mail (e-mail), you should include your e-mail address.
( b ) A reasonable description of the records you seek. A reasonable description is one that enables an NCUA employee, who is familiar with the subject area of the request, to locate the record with a reasonable amount of effort.
( c ) A statement agreeing to pay all applicable fees or to pay fees up to a certain maximum amount, or requesting a fee reduction or waiver in accordance with § 792.27. If the actual fees are expected to exceed the maximum amount you indicate in your request, NCUA will contact you to see if you are willing to pay the estimated fees. If you do not want to pay the estimated fees, your request will be closed and no bill will be sent.
( d ) If other than paper copy, you must identify the form and format of responsive information you are requesting.
[63 FR 14338, Mar. 25, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 61737, Oct. 30, 2003; 73 FR 56937, Oct. 1, 2008]
Order entered October 19, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00315-CV

KAREN M. STEPHENS-BUTLER, Appellant

V.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS 

TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE CWABS, INC., ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2015-16, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS,

Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-05354-D

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated July 29, 2016, we 

informed appellant the court reporter notified us that the reporter’s record had not been filed 

because appellants had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for or made arrangements to pay

for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification she had 

requested the record and had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, or had been 

found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to 

provide the required documentation within ten days might result in the appeal being ordered 

submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not provided the required 
documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the reporter’s 

record. Therefore, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. Appellant’s 

brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3241] 

In accordance with information received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damage as a result of this disaster from May 6, 2000 to May 8, 2000. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for economic injury is December 7, 2000.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008)

Dated: April 28, 2000.

Bernard Kulik, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 00-11644 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.714 Availability of data to the U.S. Postal Service.

The representatives of the U.S. Postal Service shall have access to all conference data and, insofar as practicable, shall be furnished copies of all pertinent data prepared by the DOT employees and the air carrier, and a reasonable time shall be allowed to review the facts and issues and to make any presentation deemed necessary; *Provided,* That in cases other than those involving an issue as to the service mail rates payable by the U.S. Postal Service pursuant to section 41901 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, representatives of the U.S. Postal Service shall be furnished with copies of data under this provision only upon their written request.
#### § 38.3 Definitions.

For the purpose of showing compliance with this part, the following terms have the specified meanings:

*Amphibious airplane* means an airplane that is capable of takeoff and landing on both land and water. Such an airplane uses its hull or floats attached to the landing gear for takeoff and landing on water, and either extendable or fixed landing gear for takeoff and landing on land.

*ICAO Annex 16, Volume III* means Volume III of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation.

*Maximum takeoff mass (MTOM)* is the maximum certified takeoff mass, expressed in kilograms, for an airplane type design.

*Performance model* is an analytical tool (or a method) validated using corrected flight test data that can be used to determine the specific air range values for calculating the fuel efficiency metric value.

*Reference geometric factor (RGF)* is a non-dimensional number derived from a two-dimensional projection of the fuselage.

*Specific air range (SAR)* is the distance an airplane travels per unit of fuel consumed. Specific air range is expressed in kilometers per kilogram of fuel.

*Subsonic* means an airplane that has not been certificated under this title to exceed Mach 1 in normal operation.

*Type certificated maximum passenger seating capacity* means the maximum number of passenger seats that may be installed on an airplane as listed on its type certificate data sheet, regardless of the actual number of seats installed on an individual airplane.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Form 10-K of Aksys, Ltd. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence D. Damron, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Dated: March 10, 2004 | By: |  | /s/LAWRENCE D. DAMRONLawrence D. Damron
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
#### § 34.5 Special test procedures.

The Administrator or the Administrator of the EPA may, upon written application by a manufacturer or operator of aircraft or aircraft engines, approve test procedures for any aircraft or aircraft engine that is not susceptible to satisfactory testing by the procedures set forth herein. Prior to taking action on any such application, the Administrator or the Administrator of the EPA shall consult with the other.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc., 

Complainants Docket No. 16-15-03 

v. 

City of Renton 

Respondent 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby 

extended to March 13, 2017. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete detennination in this 

case. 

. Willis, Director, 

Airpo Compliance 

and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 18, 2017, I caused to be emailed and placed in the 

United States mail (first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy of the 

foregoing Notice addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant 

Benjamin H. Klein 

Gross & Klein LLP 

Pier 9, Suite 100 

San Francisco CA 94111 

bklein@grosskleinlaw.com 

Counsel for Respondent 

Zanetta L. Fontes 

Senior Assistant City Attorney 

City of Renton 

1055 South Grady Way 

Renton, W A 98057 

zfontes@rentonwa.gov 

Delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) 

FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (AC0-1 00) 

Northwest Mountain Region, Compliance 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis
#### § 25.489 Ground handling conditions.

Unless otherwise prescribed, the landing gear and airplane structure must be investigated for the conditions in §§ 25.491 through 25.509 with the airplane at the design ramp weight (the maximum weight for ground handling conditions). No wing lift may be considered. The shock absorbers and tires may be assumed to be in their static position.

[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5673, Apr. 8, 1970]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

RITA MORRIS McKEEMAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GEORGE W. BUSH, etal., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

AUG 262009 

Clerk, U.S. District and 

Bankruptcy Courts 

09 1624 

This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiffs application to proceed in 

forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the 

complaint. 

The court must dismiss a complaint if it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim 

upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). In Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 

319 (1989), the Supreme Court states that the trial court has the authority to dismiss not only 

claims based on an indisputably meritless legal theory, but also claims whose factual contentions 

are clearly baseless. Claims describing fantastic or delusional scenarios fall into the category of 

cases whose factual contentions are clearly baseless. [d. at 328. The court has the discretion to 

decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such finding is appropriate when the facts alleged 

are irrational or wholly incredible. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). 

Plaintiff alleges that she "was given a Biological Weapon infectus [sic] [illegible] #4 to 

Try to Kill me, and also we went to war on these false claims." Compi. at 21 (page number 

designated by the Court). The nature of these "false claims" is unclear, as neither the complaint 
nor its may attachments sets forth her factual allegations. Plaintiff demands damages in the 

"amount of 1 000,000.00 million dollars." Id. 

The court is mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent 

standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 

U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Having reviewed plaintiffs complaint, it appears that its few factual 

contentions are baseless and wholly incredible. For this reason, the complaint is frivolous and 

must be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 19l5(e)(2)(B)(i). 

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. 

United States District Judge
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In Re: Nomination Petition of :

Michael J. Stack, Candidate for :

Lieutenant Governor :

: No. 162 M.D. 2018

Petition of: Tracey L. Gordon, Ibrul : H. Chowdhury, and M. Karen Bojar :

AMENDMENT ORDER

AND NOW, this 17 th day of April, 2018, the Court’s opinion in the

above matter, filed March 28, 2018, is amended to reflect the following correction s :

Page 2, first full paragraph, last sentence should read:

Candidate’s mother’s home at 1247 Southampton R oad is

located in the same ward and division in Philadelphia as the

Wayside Avenue property.

Page 11, beginning on line 6, should read: Code, 25 P.S. §2813,

provides a safe harbor for those whose State service or study

requires a presence in a new locatio n, even one outside

Pennsylvania.

Page 12, second full paragraph, beginning on line 6 should read:

... in

- law’s home as his residence during the time he lived,

worked and voted in ...

Page 13 , first paragraph after the quote, line 2 should read: ...

residence, reduced to its essence, is the “habitation where one

has put down ...

Page 13, second full paragraph, first sentence should read: First,

the Shimkus test does not yield a definitive outcome on this

record

.

Page 14, last paragraph, last sentence should read: The safe

harbor of Section 703 of the Election Code protects these choices2 from having the unintended consequence of changing one’s

domicile.

In all other respects, the opinion and order shall remain in effect.

It is hereby ORDERED that t he above

- captioned opinion filed March

28 , 201 8 , shall be designated OPINION rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION,

and it shall be reported.

_____________________________________ MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, President Judge
EXHIBIT 10.02


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


 


This
First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 31
day of August, 2009 (the “First Amendment Effective Date”) and amends the
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of September 29, 2008
(the “Employment Agreement”), by and between NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC. (“NFM”)
and MICHAEL WEINER (“Executive”).  Unless
otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used shall have the meaning
ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.


 


In
consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration,
including Executive’s continued employment with NFM, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Executive and NFM hereby agree as
follows:


 


I.              AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT


 


Section 1
“Term” is hereby amended by deleting such section in its entirety and
replacing the same with the following:


 


“The
Term of this Agreement shall begin as of the First Amendment Effective Date and
shall continue until midnight on August 31, 2013, or such other date as
the Agreement is terminated by either party as hereinafter provided (the “Term”).


 


II.            GENERAL PROVISIONS


 


All
other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement that have not been
specifically amended herein shall remain in full force and effect.  This First Amendment, together with the
Employment Agreement, contains all of the terms and conditions agreed upon by
the parties hereto regarding the subject matter hereof.  All prior agreements, promises, negotiations
and representations, either oral or written, relating to the subject matter of
this First Amendment or the Employment Agreement not expressly set forth in
this First Amendment or the Employment Agreement are of no force or
effect.  Any waiver, alteration or
modification of any of the terms of this First Amendment shall be valid only if
made in writing and signed by both parties hereto. This First Amendment may be
executed in up to two counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original
but together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first
set forth above.


 


 


	
  NEW
  FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.

  	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:
  

  	
  /s/
  Marc Callipari

  	
   

  	
  By:
  

  	
  /s/
  Michael Weiner

  
	
  Name:
  Marc Callipari

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  Michael Weiner

  
	
  Title:
  General Counsel