alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 305.10 Nonpublic character of proceedings.

Investigations shall be attended only by the witnesses and their counsel, the administrative law judge, the Investigation Attorney, other DOT personnel concerned with the conduct of the proceeding and the official stenographer. All orders initiating investigations, motions to quash or modify investigation subpenas, orders disposing of such motions, documents, and transcripts of testimony shall be part of the record in the investigation. Unless DOT determines otherwise, all orders initiating investigations which do not disclose the identity of the particular persons of firms under investigation shall be published in the Federal Register. Except as otherwise required by law, the remainder of the record of such proceedings shall constitute internal DOT documents which shall not be available to the general public. The use of such records in DOT proceedings subject to part 302 of the Rules of Practice shall be governed by §§ 302.25(g) and 302.12 of this chapter and by the law of evidence applicable to DOT proceedings.

[Doc. No. 82, 50 FR 2421, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended at 65 FR 6456, Feb. 9, 2000; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15937, Apr. 16, 2019]
#### Marie S. Gaza et al., Appellants, *v.*Rudolph J. Gaza, Respondent.

(Argued October 19, 1936;

decided November 17, 1936.)

*618
      *Arthur J. Ruland*for appellants

*Daniel J. McAvoy*and *Robert S. Badger*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11108

Summary Calendar

 

JAMES W. GREEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN HSU, Trustee, ET AL.,

Defendants,

TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY; 

COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:91-CV-2726-T

- - - - - - - - - -

June 10, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James W. Green appeals from the dismissal of his suit

brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)

following remand. We have reviewed each issue he has properly

raised. The district court did not err in granting summary

judgment in favor of the defendants with respect to Green’s claim
No. 96-11108

- 2 -

2

under § 502(a)(1)(B) of ERISA. See Duhon v. Texaco, Inc., 15

F.3d 1302, 1305 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court did not

abuse its discretion in denying Green’s recusal motions. See

Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 554-56 (1994). The “law

of the case” precludes the reexamination of Green’s § 510 claim

under ERISA. Green’s other issues are beyond the scope of remand

and are not addressed. See Burroughs v. FFP Operating Partners,

70 F.3d 31, 33 (5th Cir. 1996). 

The judgment is AFFIRMED. All outstanding motions are

DENIED.
#### § 29.673 Primary flight controls.

Primary flight controls are those used by the pilot for immediate control of pitch, roll, yaw, and vertical motion of the rotorcraft.

[Amdt. 29-24, 49 FR 44437, Nov. 6, 1984]
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Christian Carstens, Deceased. (Two Proceedings.) Harriet McDermott et al., Appellants; Martha Brauner, Respondent.

(Argued November 18, 1936;

decided December 4, 1936.)

*663
      *David M. Neuberger*and *Murray Ratner*for appellants.

*Harry Lesser*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
US_ACTIVE-134727109

EXHIBIT A 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:392-1 Filed:06/19/17 Entered:06/19/17 17:05:43 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 7
Exhibit 31.1

                        CERTIFICATION

     I, Sam DiGiralomo, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q  of
Allstates WorldCargo,  Inc.;

2.    Based  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any  untrue
statement  of  a  material  fact or omit  to  state  a  material  fact
necessary  to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect  to
the period covered by this report;

3.    Based  on  my  knowledge, the financial  statements,  and  other
financial information included in this report, fairly present  in  all
material  respects the financial condition, results of operations  and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented  in
this report;

4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and   I   are
responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls  and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
       disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
       supervision,  to  ensure  that  material information relating to
       the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
       made  known to us by others within those  entities, particularly
       during  the  period  in  which  this  report  is  being prepared;

  (b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's disclosure
       controls and procedures and presented in this report our
       conclusions  about the effectiveness of the  disclosure controls
       and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by this
       report based on such evaluation; and

  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
       control  over financial reporting that occurred  during the
       registrant's   most   recent  fiscal  quarter  (the registrant's
       fourth  fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
       has  materially  affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
       affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I   have
disclosed,  based  on our most recent evaluation of  internal  control
over  financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the  audit
committee   of  the  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or   persons
performing the equivalent functions):

  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
      or   operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting
      which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
      registrant's ability to record, process, summarize  and report
      financial information; and

  (b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not material,  that  involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



February 14, 2007

/s/ Sam DiGiralomo
President and Chief Executive Officer
[S. F. No. 1330.

Department One.

September 2, 1898.]

#### HALE & NORCROSS SILVER MINING COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. M. W. FOX et al., Appellants.

Appeal—Pendency op Motion to Dismiss—Supersedeas—Where the question, whether an order appealed from is or is not appealable, cannot be determined by a mere inspection of the order, but involves a consideration of the merits of the appeal, it ■ will not be determined in advance of the hearing of the appeal upon its merits. While a motion to dismiss the appeal is pend- . ing and undetermined, it is the duty of the superior court to refrain from enforcing the order, and a writ of *supersedeas*will be granted to prevent such enforcement.

MOTION in the Supreme Court for a writ of *supersedeas*to prevent the enforcement of an order vacating and setting aside a sale of certain shares of the capital stock of the plaintiff corporation, appealed from the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. W. R. Daingeriield, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the caurt.

William T. Baggett, and E. S. Pillsbury, for Appellants.

Deal, Tauszky & Wells, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

Motion for a writ of *supersedeas.*A motion heretofore made to dismiss the appeal in this cause, upon the ground that the order appealed from is not appealable, was continued until the hearing of the appeal upon its merits, for the reason that the motion could not he determined without an examination into the merits of the appeal. *(Hale etc. Min. Co. v. Fox,*120 Cal. 261.) Thereafter, upon the superior court proceeding to enforce the order appealed from, the present motion for a *supersedeas*was made in behalf of the appellants, and was resisted at the hearing upon the ground that the order is not appealable, thus presenting the same question whose hearing had been continued

This question cannot he determined by a mere inspection of the order appealed from, hut, as was held upon the former motion, involves the merits of the order and a judicial consideration of the facts and averments upon which the order was made. It *57would, therefore, be in contravention of the practice of this court to determine the question in advance of the hearing of the appeal. If the order is appealable, the appeal deprived the superior court of the power to enforce it while the appeal is pending; and whether it is appealable is a question to be ultimately decided by this court, and is now pending here upon motion to dismiss; and while that motion is undetermined it is the duty of the superior court to refrain from its enforcement. *(Ruggles v. Superior Court,*103 Cal. 125.)

The application for the writ is granted.
Editorial Note on Part 43
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous technical amendments to this part 43, see Amdt. 43-3, 31 FR 3336, Mar. 3, 1966, and Amdt. 43-6, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 43.1 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section, this part prescribes rules governing the maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, and alteration of any— ( 1 ) Aircraft having a U.S. airworthiness certificate;
( 2 ) Foreign-registered civil aircraft used in common carriage or carriage of mail under the provisions of Part 121 or 135 of this chapter; and
( 3 ) Airframe, aircraft engines, propellers, appliances, and component parts of such aircraft.
( b ) This part does not apply to— ( 1 ) Any aircraft for which the FAA has issued an experimental certificate, unless the FAA has previously issued a different kind of airworthiness certificate for that aircraft;
( 2 ) Any aircraft for which the FAA has issued an experimental certificate under the provisions of § 21.191(i)(3) of this chapter, and the aircraft was previously issued a special airworthiness certificate in the light-sport category under the provisions of § 21.190 of this chapter; or
( 3 ) Any aircraft that is operated under part 107 of this chapter, except as described in § 107.140(d).
( c ) This part applies to all life-limited parts that are removed from a type certificated product, segregated, or controlled as provided in § 43.10.
( d ) This part applies to any aircraft issued a special airworthiness certificate in the light-sport category except: ( 1 ) The repair or alteration form specified in §§ 43.5(b) and 43.9(d) is not required to be completed for products not produced under an FAA approval;
( 2 ) Major repairs and major alterations for products not produced under an FAA approval are not required to be recorded in accordance with appendix B of this part; and
( 3 ) The listing of major alterations and major repairs specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of appendix A of this part is not applicable to products not produced under an FAA approval.
[Doc. No. 1993, 29 FR 5451, Apr. 23, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 43-23, 47 FR 41084, Sept. 16, 1982; Amdt. 43-37, 66 FR 21066, Apr. 27, 2001; Amdt. 43-38, 67 FR 2109, Jan. 15, 2002; Amdt. 43-39, 69 FR 44863, July 27, 2004; Amdt. 43-44, 75 FR 5219, Feb. 1, 2010; Docket FAA-2015-0150, Amdt. 43-48, 81 FR 42208, June 28, 2016; Docket FAA-2018-1087, Amdt. 43-51, 86 FR 4381, Jan. 15, 2021]
Exhibit 23.1

WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.

May 7, 2010

Contango Oil & Gas
Company

3700 Buffalo Speedway, Suite 960

Houston, Texas 77098

Re:    Contango Oil & Gas Company, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Gentlemen:

The firm of
William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. consents to the use of its name and to the use of its projections for Contango Oil & Gas Companys Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of May 7, 2010 in Contangos Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.

William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. has no interests in Contango
Oil & Gas Company or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with Contango Oil & Gas Company.
Contango Oil & Gas Company does not employ us on a contingent basis.

Yours very truly,



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
|                                  
|/s/ F.J. MAREK                    
|F.J. Marek, P.E.                  
|Senior Vice President
UNITED STATES
                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                        Washington, DC   20549

                                FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

XX  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
---  ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

    TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
---  ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _______ TO ______.


    Commission file number        000-24991
                             ____________________


                         ALLSTATES WORLDCARGO, INC.
     -------------------------------------------------------------------
     (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)


          New Jersey                            22-3487471
        --------------                 -------------------------------
  (State or other jurisdiction        (IRS Employer Identification No.)
     of incorporation)


           4 Lakeside Drive South, Forked River, New Jersey, 08731
          ----------------------------------------------------------
                 (Address of principal executive offices)


                             609-693-5950
            --------------------------------------------------
            (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days)

Yes  XX      No
    ----         ----


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes          No   XX
    ----         ----

The Company had 32,509,872 shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per
share, outstanding as of February 12, 2004.

                                     -1-
<PAGE>

The front page only of this Form 10-Q is being refiled to include the
statement that the registrant is not an accelerated filer as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, which statement was inadvertently omitted
from the original filing.


                                     -2-
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.


ALLSTATES WORLDCARGO, INC.


BY:       /s/ SAM DIGIRALOMO                  DATED:    February 17, 2004
        ---------------------------------               -----------------
          Sam DiGiralomo, President and CEO




BY:       /s/ Craig D. Stratton               DATED:    February 17, 2004
        ---------------------------------               -----------------
          Craig D. Stratton, CFO, Secretary,
        Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer





                                     -3-
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4550 

To amend section 3142 of title 18, United States Code, to establish a 

rebuttable presumption that a person arrested for rioting or related 

offenses should be held pending trial. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2020 

Mr. COTTON (for himself and Mrs. LOEFFLER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 3142 of title 18, United States Code, 

to establish a rebuttable presumption that a person arrested for rioting or related offenses should be held pending trial. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Catch-and-Release 

5 for Rioters Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4550 IS

1 SEC. 2. REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION ON HOLDING PER2 SONS ARRESTED FOR RIOTING PENDING 

3 TRIAL. 

4 Section 3142(e)(3) of title 18, United States Code, 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

7 the end; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period 

9 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(F) an offense under paragraph (1) or (2) of 

12 section 231(a) or under section 2101.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Wednesday 24th July, 1996.

Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation and Richard-Flagship Services, Inc., Appellants, against Record No. 1416-95-1 Claim No. 154-00-19 Donald Eugene Umphlett, Appellee.

Upon a Rehearing Before Judges Baker, Bray and Overton

It appears to the Court that the decisions of the Supreme Court of Virginia in the cases of The Steinrich Group, et al. v. Claudia H. Jemmott , Record No. 950829, Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Linda Kay Martin , Record No. 951050, and Wampler-Longacre Chicken, Inc., et al. , Record No. 951072 (March 1, 1996), control the instant case and that, thus, the award appealed from is erroneous. Accordingly, the opinion previously rendered on February 27, 1996 is withdrawn, the mandate entered on that date is vacated, and the award of the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission is

reversed. This order shall be certified to the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission. A Copy,

Teste:
Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 294

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 294 appear at 84 FR 15934, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 294.84 Air competency requirements.

Registrants shall conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements prescribed by the Government of Canada for Canadian international air service.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-70331) of our report dated January 27, 1999,
except as to Notes 3 and 11, which are as of March 15, 1999, appearing on page
F-2 of broadcast.com inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement
Schedule, which appears on page S-1 of such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
                            
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 26, 1999
§ 17.61 Use of alternative dispute resolution. ( a ) Only non-binding, voluntary ADR will be used to attempt to resolve a Pre-dispute pursuant to § 17.37.
( b ) ADR conducted under this subpart is subject to the confidentiality requirements of § 17.39.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.199 Issue of special flight permits. ( a ) Except as provided in § 21.197(c), an applicant for a special flight permit must submit a statement in a form and manner prescribed by the FAA, indicating— ( 1 ) The purpose of the flight.
( 2 ) The proposed itinerary.
( 3 ) The crew required to operate the aircraft and its equipment, e.g., pilot, co-pilot, navigator, etc.
( 4 ) The ways, if any, in which the aircraft does not comply with the applicable airworthiness requirements.
( 5 ) Any restriction the applicant considers necessary for safe operation of the aircraft.
( 6 ) Any other information considered necessary by the FAA for the purpose of prescribing operating limitations.
( b ) The FAA may make, or require the applicant to make appropriate inspections or tests necessary for safety.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14570, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-21, 33 FR 6859, May 7, 1968; Amdt. 21-22, 33 FR 11901, Aug. 22, 1968]
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.123 Production under type certificate. Each manufacturer of a product being manufactured under a type certificate must— ( a ) Maintain at the place of manufacture all information and data specified in §§ 21.31 and 21.41;
( b ) Make each product and article thereof available for inspection by the FAA;
( c ) Maintain records of the completion of all inspections and tests required by §§ 21.127, 21.128, and 21.129 for at least 5 years for the products and articles thereof manufactured under the approval and at least 10 years for critical components identified under § 45.15(c) of this chapter;
( d ) Allow the FAA to make any inspection or test, including any inspection or test at a supplier facility, necessary to determine compliance with this subchapter;
( e ) Mark the product in accordance with part 45 of this chapter, including any critical parts;
( f ) Identify any portion of that product (*e.g.,* sub-assemblies, component parts, or replacement articles) that leave the manufacturer's facility as FAA approved with the manufacturer's part number and name, trademark, symbol, or other FAA-approved manufacturer's identification; and
( g ) Except as otherwise authorized by the FAA, obtain a production certificate for that product in accordance with subpart G of this part within 6 months after the date of issuance of the type certificate.
[Doc. No. FAA-2006-25877, Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53387, Oct. 16, 2009]
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 434 

AN ACT 

To require the collection of certain data relating to Bureau 

of Land Management land acquisitions, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 434 ES

1 SECTION 1. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND ACQUI2 SITION DATA. 

3 The Secretary of the Interior (acting through the Di4 rector of the Bureau of Land Management) shall— 

5 (1) collect centralized data on land acquired for 

6 administration by the Bureau of Land Management 

7 using amounts from the Land and Water Conserva8 tion Fund established under section 200302 of title 

9 54, United States Code, including data on— 

10 (A) the method used for the acquisition; 

11 and 

12 (B) the type of interest acquired; 

13 (2) not later than 1 year after the date of en14 actment of this Act, and annually thereafter, submit 

15 to Congress a report describing the information col16 lected under paragraph (1); and 

17 (3) develop guidance to ensure that land acqui18 sition data collected under paragraph (1) is entered 

19 correctly and properly coded in the data system of 

20 the Bureau of Land Management. 

Passed the Senate December 2, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 434 

AN ACT 

To require the collection of certain data relating to 

and for other purposes. Bureau of Land Management land acquisitions,