alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4209 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.4209

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title IX of the Social Security Act to improve emergency 
      unemployment relief for governmental entities and nonprofit 
                             organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Nonprofits from 
Catastrophic Cash Flow Strain Act of 2020''.
SEC. 2. IMPROVING EMERGENCY UNEMPLOYMENT RELIEF FOR GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES AND NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.
    (a) In General.--Section 903(i)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1103(i)(1)) is amended--
        (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``during'' and inserting 
    ``with respect to'';
        (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``3309(a)(1)'' and 
    inserting ``3309(a)''; and
        (3) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the following 
    new subparagraph:
    ``(C) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds transferred 
to the account of a State under subparagraph (A) shall be used 
exclusively to reduce the amounts required to be paid in lieu of 
contributions into the State unemployment fund pursuant to such section 
by governmental entities and other organizations described in section 
3309(a) of such Code.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
        (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the amendments made 
    by subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enactment 
    of section 2103 of the Relief for Workers Affected by Coronavirus 
    Act (contained in subtitle A of title II of division A of the CARES 
    Act (Public Law 116-136)).
        (2) Application to weeks prior to enactment.--For weeks of 
    unemployment that occurred after March 12, 2020, and prior to the 
    date of enactment of this section, States may--
            (A) issue reimbursements in accordance with section 
        903(i)(1)(C) of the Social Security Act, as in effect prior to 
        the date of enactment of this section; or
            (B) reduce the amounts required to be paid in accordance 
        with such section 903(i)(1)(C), as amended by subsection (a).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **6939**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appell ee ,

v. JOSEPH MCCOY POWELL , Defendant

– Appe ll ant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of N o r th Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 2 :9 3

- c r - 00 004

- BO

- 1 )

Submitted : September 30 , 2010 Decided: October 12 , 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE , and KEENAN, Circuit Judge s .
Affirmed by un published per curiam opin ion

. Robert Lonnie Cooper, COOPER, DAVIS & COOPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellant. J ennifer P. May

- Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bind ing precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph McCoy Powell appeals the district court ’ s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordin gly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Powell , No. 2:93

- cr - 00004

- BO

- 1 (E.D.N.C. July 7, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRME D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                          42,527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,372
<INVENTORY>                                      3,577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,968
<PP&E>                                          31,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 254,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,586
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                     141,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   254,269
<SALES>                                        655,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               655,714
<CGS>                                          613,541
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  643,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,345
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50


</TABLE>
§ 29.659 Mass balance. ( a ) The rotor and blades must be mass balanced as necessary to— ( 1 ) Prevent excessive vibration; and
( 2 ) Prevent flutter at any speed up to the maximum forward speed.
( b ) The structural integrity of the mass balance installation must be substantiated.
[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968]
Exhibit 24.6


                              KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



     WHEREAS,  KeySpan  Corporation,  a New York  corporation  (the  "Company"),
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K as prescribed by
said Commission  pursuant to said Act and the rules and regulations  promulgated
thereunder.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in my capacity as a director of the Company,  I do hereby
appoint GERALD LUTERMAN, JOHN J. BISHAR, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and each of
them  severally,  as my  attorneys-in-fact  with power to execute in my name and
place, and in my capacity as a director of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any
amendment  to said  Report  and  any  other  documents  required  in  connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney this 22nd day of
February, 2006.





                                                     /s/Gloria C. Larson
#### CONNER v. THE STATE.

(Decided December 16, 1915.)

Appeal from Autauga Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

Guy Rice, and P. E. Alexander, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed on motion of Attorney General.
#### Helen G. SEITZ and Arthur MacGregor Seitz, 3d v. John E. TOOLAN, Helen G. Seitz, Appellant.

No. 12988.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 19, 1960.

Decided June 2, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Phillip Forman, Judge.

John E. Toolan, pro se.

Harry Green, Asbury Park, N. J., for appellees.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the very large record in this case makes it clear that the court below committed no error. Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed.
99–008 

112TH CONGRESS REPT. 112–60 " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session Part 2 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 1473) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND THE OTHER DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES OF THE GOVERNMENT FOR THE FISCAL 

YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES; PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION (H. 

CON. RES. 35) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO MAKE A CORRECTION IN THE ENROLLMENT OF H.R. 1473; AND 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

(H. CON. RES. 36) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO MAKE A CORRECTION IN THE ENROLLMENT OF H.R. 

1473 

APRIL 13, 2011.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 

[To accompany H. Res. 218] 

Pursuant to clause 3(a)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives for the 112th Congress, the Committee on Rules 

hereby files a supplemental report in order to correct an error in 

the depiction of Rules Committee Record Vote No. 79. The vote 

total was incorrectly depicted as 3 yeas and 7 nays. The correct 

total should have been 3 yeas and 8 nays, with Mr. Reed voting 

in the negative. The correct depiction is as follows: 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with HEARING
2 

Rules Committee Record Vote No. 79 

Motion by Mr. Polis to make in order and provide the appropriate waivers for amendment #4, offered by himself, which would reduce the amount of troops permanently stationed in Europe from 80,000 to 35,000 

and would cut end-strength levels by 7,500; and amendment #12, offered by himself, which would strike 

all funding for the Office of National Drug Control Policy, commonly known as the Drug Czar. Not agreed 

to: 3 yeas and 8 nays. 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Sessions ...................... Nay Ms. Slaughter .................... ....................

Ms. Foxx ............................. Nay Mr. McGovern ..................... Yea 

Mr. Bishop of Utah ............ Nay Mr. Hastings of Florida ..... Yea 

Mr. Woodall ........................ Nay Mr. Polis ............................. Yea 

Mr. Nugent ......................... .................... ............................................ ....................

Mr. Scott of South Carolina Nay ............................................ ....................

Mr. Webster ........................ Nay ............................................ ....................

Mr. Reed ............................ Nay ............................................ ....................

Mr. Dreier, Chairman ......... Nay ............................................ ....................

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with HEARING
§ 25.1709 System safety: EWIS. Each EWIS must be designed and installed so that: ( a ) Each catastrophic failure condition— ( 1 ) Is extremely improbable; and
( 2 ) Does not result from a single failure.
( b ) Each hazardous failure condition is extremely remote.
§ 243.3 Definitions. *Air piracy* means any seizure of or exercise of control over an aircraft, by force or violence or threat of force or violence, or by any other form of intimidation, and with wrongful intent.
*Aviation disaster* means: ( 1 ) An occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft that takes place between the time any passengers have boarded the aircraft with the intention of flight and the time all such persons have disembarked or have been removed from the aircraft, and in which any person suffers death or serious injury, and in which the death or injury was caused by a crash, fire, collision, sabotage or accident;
( 2 ) A missing aircraft; or
( 3 ) An act of air piracy.
*Contact* means a person not on the covered flight or an entity that should be contacted in case of an aviation disaster. The contact need not have any particular relationship to a passenger.
*Covered airline* means: ( 1 ) certificated air carriers, and
( 2 ) foreign air carriers, except those that hold Department of Transportation authority to conduct operations in foreign air transportation using only small aircraft (*i.e.*, aircraft designed to have a maximum passenger capacity of not more than 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of not more than 18,000 pounds).
*Covered flight segment* means a passenger-carrying flight segment operating to or from the United States (*i.e.*, the flight segment where the last point of departure or the first point of arrival is in the United States). A covered flight segment does not include a flight segment in which both the point of departure and point of arrival are in the United States.
*Full name* means the given name, middle initial or middle name, if any, and family name or surname as provided by the passenger.
*Passenger* means every person aboard a covered flight segment regardless of whether he or she paid for the transportation, had a reservation, or occupied a seat, except the crew. For the purposes of this part, passenger includes, but is not limited to, a revenue and non-revenue passenger, a person holding a confirmed reservation, a standby or walkup, a person rerouted from another flight or airline, an infant held upon a person's lap and a person occupying a jump seat. Airline personnel who are on board but not working on that particular flight segment would be considered passengers for the purpose of this part.
*United States* means the States comprising the United States of America, the District of Columbia, and the territories and possessions of the United States, including the territorial sea and the overlying airspace.
*U.S. citizen* means United States nationals as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22).
§ 406.149 Evidence. ( a ) *General.* A party is entitled to present the party's case or defense by oral, documentary, or demonstrative evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct any cross-examination that may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( b ) *Admissibility.* A party may introduce any oral, documentary, or demonstrative evidence in support of the party's case or defense. The administrative law judge must admit any oral, documentary, or demonstrative evidence introduced by a party but must exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence.
( c ) *Hearsay evidence.* Hearsay evidence is admissible in proceedings governed by this subpart. The fact that evidence submitted by a party is hearsay goes only to the weight of the evidence and does not affect its admissibility.
First Amendment to Vendor Agreement



 
Exhibit 10.3

 
FIRST
AMENDMENT TO VENDOR AGREEMENT 
 
This FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE VENDOR AGREEMENT (this “First Amendment”) is
effective as of February 1, 2003 (the “First Amendment Effective Date”) by and between BEST BUY PURCHASING LLC and TIVO
INC. 
 
RECITALS 
 
WHEREAS, Best Buy Co., Inc. and TiVo Inc. entered into that certain Vendor Agreement having an effective date of March 3, 2002 (the “Vendor Agreement”); 
 
WHEREAS, Best Buy Co.,
Inc. and TiVo Inc. have previously extended the term of the Vendor Agreement; 
 
WHEREAS, Best Buy Co., Inc. assigned all of its rights and obligations under the Vendor Agreement to Best Buy Purchasing LLC; and 
 
WHEREAS, Best Buy
Purchasing LLC and TiVo Inc. wish to further extend the term of the Vendor Agreement. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, Best Buy Purchasing LLC and TiVo Inc. agree as follows: 
 
AGREEMENT 
 
Unless stated otherwise, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Vendor Agreement.

 
1.    TERM.  Section 16.1 of the Vendor Agreement is hereby amended by replacing “February 1, 2003” with “February 29, 2004”. 
 
2.    EFFECT OF
AMENDMENT.  Except as expressly modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Vendor Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Best Buy Purchasing LLC’s and
TiVo Inc.’s respective duly authorized officers have executed this First Amendment. This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same
original. 
 

	 TIVO INC.
	 	 BEST BUY PURCHASING LLC

	
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Joe Miller

	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Michael London


	
	 Printed Name:
	 	 Joe Miller

	 	 Printed Name:
	 	 Michael London


	
	 Title:
	 	 VP, Sales

	 	 Title:
	 	 EVP Comm



 

1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4420 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4420

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to pay costs relating to the transportation of certain 
deceased veterans to certain State and tribal veterans' cemeteries, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2020

 Mr. Rounds (for himself, Mr. Cassidy, and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                          on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to pay costs relating to the transportation of certain 
deceased veterans to certain State and tribal veterans' cemeteries, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Unclaimed Veterans Burial Benefit 
Correction Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION OF DECEASED VETERANS TO CERTAIN VETERANS' 
              CEMETERIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2308(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``in a national 
        cemetery'' and inserting ``in a covered cemetery''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``to the national 
        cemetery'' and inserting ``to the covered cemetery''.
    (b) Covered Cemetery Defined.--Section 2308 of such title is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Covered Cemetery Defined.--In this section, the term `covered 
cemetery' has the meaning given such term in section 2306(f)(2) of this 
title.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 2308 of such title is amended in 
the section heading by adding at the end the following: ``or a 
veterans' cemetery''.
    (d) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 23 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to 
section 2308 and inserting the following new item:

``2308. Transportation of deceased veteran to a national cemetery or a 
                            veterans' cemetery.''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered September 29, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00295
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF: E.B ., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 10
- 03980 U 

### O RDER
On September 2 , 2015, appellee filed a first motion to amend appellee’s brief. This motion and any other pe nding motions filed by appellee are hereby DENIED as moot

.
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraSite, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Stephen H. Clark, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. April 21, 2004 /s/ STEPHEN H. CLARKStephen H. ClarkChief Executive Officer
 52
#### § 39.19 May I address the unsafe condition in a way other than that set out in the airworthiness directive?

Yes, anyone may propose to FAA an alternative method of compliance or a change in the compliance time, if the proposal provides an acceptable level of safety. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, send your proposal to your principal inspector. Include the specific actions you are proposing to address the unsafe condition. The principal inspector may add comments and will send your request to the manager of the office identified in the airworthiness directive (manager). You may send a copy to the manager at the same time you send it to the principal inspector. If you do not have a principal inspector send your proposal directly to the manager. You may use the alternative you propose only if the manager approves it.
§ 433.7 Environmental. ( a ) *General.* The FAA is responsible for complying with the procedures and policies of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental laws, regulations, and Executive Orders prior to issuing a reentry site license. An applicant must provide the FAA with information needed to comply with such requirements. The FAA will consider and document the potential environmental effects associated with issuing a license for a reentry site.
( b ) *Environmental impact statement or environmental assessment.* When directed by the FAA, an applicant must— ( 1 ) Prepare an Environmental Assessment with FAA oversight;
( 2 ) Assume financial responsibility for preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement by an FAA-selected and -managed consultant contractor; or
( 3 ) Submit information to support a written re-evaluation of a previously submitted Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement.
( c ) *Categorical exclusion.* The FAA may determine that a categorical exclusion is appropriate upon receipt of supporting information from an applicant.
( d ) *Environmental information.* An application must include an approved FAA Environmental Assessment, Environmental Impact Statement, categorical exclusion determination, or written re-evaluation covering all planned licensed activities in compliance with NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA.
[Doc. No. FAA-2019-0229, Amdt. 433-3, 85 FR 79717, Dec. 10, 2020]