alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4534 

To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the 

scope of protection from civil liability for ‘‘good Samaritan’’ blocking 

and screening of offensive material. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 

Mr. WICKER (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 

to modify the scope of protection from civil liability for 

‘‘good Samaritan’’ blocking and screening of offensive 

material. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Online Freedom and 

5 Viewpoint Diversity Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4534 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION FROM CIVIL LIABILITY FOR ‘‘GOOD 

2 SAMARITAN’’ BLOCKING AND SCREENING OF 

3 OFFENSIVE MATERIAL. 

4 Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

5 U.S.C. 230) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (c)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

8 (i) by striking ‘‘No provider’’ and in9 serting the following: 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—No provider’’; and 

11 (ii) by adding at the end the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(B) APPLICABILITY.— 

14 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) 

15 shall not apply to any decision or agree16 ment made or action taken by a provider 

17 or user of an interactive computer service 

18 to restrict access to or availability of mate19 rial provided by another information con20 tent provider. 

21 ‘‘(ii) CIVIL LIABILITY.—Any applica22 ble immunity for a decision or agreement 

23 made or action taken by a provider or user 

24 of an interactive computer service de25 scribed in clause (i) shall be provided solely 

26 by paragraph (2).’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4534 IS

1 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

2 (i) in subparagraph (A)— 

3 (I) by striking ‘‘considers to be’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘has an objectively rea5 sonable belief is’’; and 

6 (II) by striking ‘‘or otherwise ob7 jectionable’’ and inserting ‘‘promoting 

8 self-harm, promoting terrorism, or un9 lawful’’; and 

10 (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

11 ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subpara12 graph (A)’’; and 

13 (2) in subsection (f)(3)— 

14 (A) by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting 

15 the following: 

16 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term’’; and 

17 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(B) RESPONSIBILITY.—For purposes of 

19 subparagraph (A), being responsible in whole or 

20 in part for the creation or development of infor21 mation— 

22 ‘‘(i) includes any instance in which a 

23 person or entity editorializes or affirma24 tively and substantively modifies the con25 tent of another person or entity; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 4534 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) does not include a change to the 

2 format, layout, or basic appearance of the 

3 content of another person or entity.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 420.3 Applicability.

This part applies to any person seeking a license to operate a launch site or to a person licensed under this part. A person operating a site that only supports amateur rocket activities as defined in 14 CFR 1.1, does not need a license under this part to operate the site.

[Doc. No. FAA-2007-27390, 73 FR 73782, Dec. 4, 2008]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial
Officer of Fortune Entertainment Corporation, that, to his knowledge, the
quarterly report of the company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the company's financial
condition and results of operations.


August 12, 2004


/s/ Phillip Verrill
Phillip Verrill, Chief Financial Officer
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4560 

To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to establish 

a forgivable loan program for remote recreational businesses, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2020 

Ms. SMITH (for herself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to establish a forgivable loan program for remote 

recreational businesses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Remote Recreational 

5 Small Business Interruption Program Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4560 IS

1 (1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term ‘‘Adminis2 trator’’ means the Administrator of the Small Busi3 ness Administration. 

4 (2) REMOTE RECREATIONAL BUSINESS.—The 

5 term ‘‘remote recreational business’’ means a busi6 ness in the contiguous United States that is— 

7 (A) a small business concern (as defined in 

8 section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 632)) operating in the recreational industry; 

10 (B) located within 75 miles of the United 

11 States and Canadian border; and 

12 (C) only accessible by land via Canada. 

13 SEC. 3. FORGIVABLE LOAN PROGRAM FOR REMOTE REC14 REATIONAL BUSINESSES. 

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall establish 

16 a program to make forgivable loans available to remote 

17 recreational businesses that experienced a loss in revenue 

18 that is greater than 50 percent during the period begin19 ning on March 1, 2020, and ending on July 1, 2020, as 

20 compared with the same period during 2019. 

21 (b) ELIGIBILITY.—To be eligible for a forgivable loan 

22 under subsection (a), a remote recreational business 

23 shall— 

24 (1) have been in operation on March 1, 2020; 

25 and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4560 IS

1 (2) show that the closure of the United States 

2 and Canadian border restricted the ability of Amer3 ican customers to access the location of the remote 

4 recreational business. 

5 (c) LOAN AMOUNT.—The maximum loan amount 

6 under subsection (a) shall be equal to 75 percent of the 

7 gross annual receipts for the remote recreational business 

8 for fiscal year 2019. 

9 (d) FORGIVENESS.—Not later than 1 year after the 

10 date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall for11 give 100 percent of the value of a loan made to a remote 

12 recreational business under subsection (a) less the amount 

13 the remote recreational business received from— 

14 (1) any other loan forgiveness program, includ15 ing any program established under the CARES Act 

16 (Public Law 116–136); or 

17 (2) an advance under section 1110 of the 

18 CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9009). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 382.78 May carriers charge individuals with disabilities for the damage their service animal causes?

While you generally cannot charge an individual with a disability for transporting service animals, or for providing other services that this part requires, you may charge a passenger with a disability for damage caused by his or her service animal so long as you normally charge individuals without disabilities for similar kinds of damage.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2018-0068, 85 FR 79774, Dec. 10, 2020]
Motion Granted; Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 21 ,

2013.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00433

- CR

ROBERT HERNANDEZ RAM OS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court Galveston Count y, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10CR3693



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted a ppellant of capital murder

. On April 2 , 2012, the trial court sentenced appellant to life in prison without the possibility of parole. See
Tex. Penal Code § 12.31(a)(2)

. Appella nt filed a timely notice of appeal. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal
is wholl y frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders2

v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by present ing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to
be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the rig ht to examine the appellate reco rd and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than sixty days ha ve passed and no pro se response has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in
the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for
review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Boyce and Donovan.

Do Not P ublish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allstates WorldCargo, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I, Craig D. Stratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
           Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
           operations of the Company for the periods presented.


August 13, 2004


/s/ Craig D. Stratton
------------------------
Craig D. Stratton
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
§ 61.153 Eligibility requirements: General. To be eligible for an airline transport pilot certificate, a person must: ( a ) Meet the following age requirements: ( 1 ) For an airline transport pilot certificate obtained under the aeronautical experience requirements of §§ 61.159, 61.161, or 61.163, be at least 23 years of age; or
( 2 ) For an airline transport pilot certificate obtained under the aeronautical experience requirements of § 61.160, be at least 21 years of age.
( b ) Be able to read, speak, write, and understand the English language. If the applicant is unable to meet one of these requirements due to medical reasons, then the Administrator may place such operating limitations on that applicant's pilot certificate as are necessary for the safe operation of the aircraft;
( c ) Be of good moral character;
( d ) Meet at least one of the following requirements: ( 1 ) Holds a commercial pilot certificate with an instrument rating issued under this part;
( 2 ) Meet the military experience requirements under § 61.73 of this part to qualify for a commercial pilot certificate, and an instrument rating if the person is a rated military pilot or former rated military pilot of an Armed Force of the United States; or
( 3 ) Holds either a foreign airline transport pilot license with instrument privileges, or a foreign commercial pilot license with an instrument rating, that— ( i ) Was issued by a contracting State to the Convention on International Civil Aviation; and
( ii ) Contains no geographical limitations.
( e ) For an airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane category multiengine class rating or an airline transport pilot certificate obtained concurrently with a multiengine airplane type rating, receive a graduation certificate from an authorized training provider certifying completion of the airline transport pilot certification training program specified in § 61.156 before applying for the knowledge test required by paragraph (g) of this section;
( f ) Meet the aeronautical experience requirements of this subpart that apply to the aircraft category and class rating sought before applying for the practical test;
( g ) Pass a knowledge test on the aeronautical knowledge areas of § 61.155(c) of this part that apply to the aircraft category and class rating sought;
( h ) Pass the practical test on the areas of operation listed in § 61.157(e) of this part that apply to the aircraft category and class rating sought; and
( i ) Comply with the sections of this subpart that apply to the aircraft category and class rating sought.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 61-103, 62 FR 40905, July 30, 1997; Amdt. 61-124, 74 FR 42559, Aug. 21, 2009; Amdt. 61-130, 78 FR 42374, July 15, 2013; Amdt. 61-149, 86 FR 62087, Nov. 9, 2021]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

AH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY HUGH HALL,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

D. G. ADAMS,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 06-16904

D.C. No. CV-02-01187-DFL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Timothy Hugh Hall appeals from the district court’s

judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

JAN 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
AH/Research 06-16904

Hall contends that his due process rights were violated when the prosecutor

stated in the jury’s presence that Hall “lied” about his income on a loan

application. 

The district court correctly determined that the prosecutor’s statement did

not “so infect[] the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial

of due process.” Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 181 (1986). Further, the

state court’s conclusion that any potential prejudice was cured by the trial court’s

admonition to the jury was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of,

clearly established federal law. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). 

AFFIRMED.
EPA Region 9 Tribal Operat io ns Committee Discussion of EPA’s Potential Reinterpretation of the Clean Water Act Provision Regarding Tribal Authority

April 30 , 2014 Meeting Notes

EPA Presenters: Wendell Smith, EPA Region 9 Water Division

Fred Leutner, EPA Office of Science and Technology

P a rticipants: Members of the Region 9 RTOC (list not available)

Wendell Smith opened the session, and introduced Fred Leutner , participating via video conference from

the Office of Science and Technology in EPA headquarters

. Fred then gave a presentation on the potential reinterpretation of the TAS process , based on the briefing “Potential Reinterpretation of a Clea n Water Act Provision Regarding Tribal Eligibility to Administer Regulatory Programs,” available at EPA’s website, http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/wqs library/tribal.cfm

.

The meeting continued with an opportunity for questions and comments from participants. The following is a list of questions and comments received from participants during the mee ting

. For each of the questions, the EPA presenters provided responses consistent with the presentation materials and other

information available at http://wa ter.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/wqslibrary/tribal.cfm

. V iews and comments were acknowledged, and will be considered by EPA in developing the proposed rule.

 The State of Nevada just removed state water quality standards from Tribal Waters. How will this relate to the TAS reinterpretation?

 Would a tribe that has nonmember

- owned fee land still have to go through the Montana test anyway? For example, if the tribe or EPA tries to enforce permits in fee land, will they end up having to go through the Montana test anyway?
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the period ended June 30, 2005, I, Anthony J. Gould, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Financial and Chief Accounting Officer of  the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  that:

 

(1)                                            suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30,2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                            theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Companyfor the period ended June 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western SierraBancorp.

 

 
| Dated:  August 5, 2005 |                                   |                  |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                             |                                   |                  |
|                             |                                   | /s/ Anthony  J. Gould |   |   |
|                             | Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |                  |
|                                  |                                        |                       |  |  |

 

1

----
Editorial Note on Part 380
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 380.62 Registration applications. ( a ) To be registered under this subpart, a foreign charter operator shall file two copies of an application for registration with the Office of International Aviation, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing/Special Authorities Division. The Department will list the names and nationalities of all persons applying for registration in its Weekly Summary of Filings.
( b ) The application shall be made on OST Form 4530, which can be obtained from the Office of International Aviation, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing/Special Authorities Division.
( c ) The applicant shall clearly indicate in its application for registration whether it requests authority to engage in foreign and/or interstate air transportation.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4438 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect Federal employees from 

retaliation for the lawful use of Federal records, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 5, 2020 

Mr. LEAHY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect Federal 

employees from retaliation for the lawful use of Federal 

records, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ac5 cess to Information Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTIONS AGAINST RETALIATION FOR LAWFUL 

7 USE OF FEDERAL RECORDS BY FEDERAL EM8 PLOYEES. 

9 (a) PROTECTION AGAINST RETALIATION.—Section 

10 2302(b)(9) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4438 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ‘‘or’’ 

4 after the semicolon; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(E) the employee or applicant for employ7 ment— 

8 ‘‘(i) making a request for information 

9 pursuant to section 552 (commonly re10 ferred to as the ‘Freedom of Information 

11 Act’) or subsection (d) of section 552a 

12 (commonly referred to as the ‘Privacy Act 

13 of 1974’); or 

14 ‘‘(ii) pursuing any administrative or 

15 judicial action with respect to such request, 

16 including seeking assistance or to engage 

17 in dispute resolution, as described in sec18 tion 552.’’. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

20 (1) TITLE 5.—Sections 1214, 1215(a)(3)(B), 

21 1221, 2302, and 7703 of title 5, United States 

22 Code, are amended by striking ‘‘or (D)’’ in each in23 stance and inserting ‘‘(D), or (E)’’. 

24 (2) WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ENHANCE25 MENT ACT OF 2012.—Section 116(b)(1)(A) of the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4438 IS

1 Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 

2 (31 U.S.C. 1116 note) is amended by striking ‘‘or 

3 (D)’’ and inserting ‘‘(D), or (E)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS