13530 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

comments received, and other 

information. The street address for the 

Docket Operations office (telephone 

(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES

section. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

2014–05–23 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 

39–17796. Docket No. FAA–2013–0798; 

Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–087–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes 

effective April 15, 2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model 

BD–100–1A10 (Challenger 300) airplanes, 

certificated in any category, serial numbers 

20003 and subsequent. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 24, Electrical power. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by multiple reports 

of erratic electrical status indications on the 

push button annunciators and the engine 

instrument and crew alerting system. Certain 

of those reported incidents resulted in the 

airplane experiencing a momentary loss of 

electrical power and loss of flight displays. 

We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of 

electrical power, which could result in the 

loss of flight displays and reduced 

controllability of the airplane. 

(f) Compliance 

You are responsible for having the actions 

required by this AD performed within the 

compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

(g) Direct Current Power Centers (DCPC) 

Modification 

For airplanes having serial numbers 20003 

through 20405 inclusive: Within 800 flight 

hours after the effective date of this AD or 

within 24 months after the effective date of 

this AD, whichever occurs first, modify the 

left-hand DCPC, right-hand DCPC, and 

auxiliary DCPC, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 100–24–23, dated November 

26, 2012. 

(h) Parts Installation Limitation 

As of the effective date of this AD, no 

person may install a DCPC having a part 

number specified in paragraphs (h)(1) 

through (h)(9) of this AD on any airplane, 

unless the DCPC serial number has a suffix 

‘‘R’’ beside the serial number. 

(1) 970GC02Y04. 

(2) 970GC02Y05. 

(3) 970GC02Y06. 

(4) 975GC02Y04. 

(5) 975GC02Y05. 

(6) 975GC02Y06. 

(7) 320GC03Y04. 

(8) 320GC03Y05. 

(9) 320GC03Y06. 

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 

39.19, send your request to your principal 

inspector or local Flight Standards District 

Office, as appropriate. If sending information 

directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: 

Program Manager, Continuing Operational 

Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; 

telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. 

Before using any approved AMOC, notify 

your appropriate principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer or other source, 

use these actions if they are FAA-approved. 

Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State 

of Design Authority (or their delegated 

agent). You are required to assure the product 

is airworthy before it is returned to service. 

(j) Related Information 

Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian 

Airworthiness Directive CF–2013–05, dated 

February 22, 2013, for related information. 

This MCAI may be found in the AD docket 

on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov/

#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0798-0001. 

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 100–24–23, 

dated November 26, 2012. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 CoˆteVertu Road West, Dorval, Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, 

Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514– 

855–7401; email thd.crj@

aero.bombardier.com; Internet http://

www.bombardier.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 

26, 2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–04822 Filed 3–10–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0977; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–190–AD; Amendment 

39–17795; AD 2014–05–22] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for all The 

Boeing Company Model 717–200 

airplanes. This AD was prompted by 

multiple reports of cracking in the 

overwing frames. This AD requires 

repetitive inspections for cracking in the 

overwing frames, and corrective actions 

if necessary. We are issuing this AD to 

detect and correct such cracking, which 

could result in a severed frame and 

might increase the loading of adjacent 

frames, resulting in damage to the 

adjacent structure and consequent loss 

of structural integrity of the airplane. 

DATES: This AD is effective April 15, 

2014. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in this AD 

as of April 15, 2014. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 13531 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, 3855 

Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800–0019, 

Long Beach, CA 90846–0001; telephone 

206–544–5000, extension 2; fax 206– 

766–5683; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view 

this referenced service information at 

the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0977; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Docket Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric 

Schrieber, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, Los 

Angeles ACO, FAA, 3960 Paramount 

Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; 

phone: 562–627–5348; fax: 562–627– 

5210; email: eric.schrieber@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to all The Boeing Company Model 

717–200 airplanes. The NPRM 

published in the Federal Register on 

December 4, 2013 (78 FR 72836). The 

NPRM was prompted by multiple 

reports of cracking in the overwing 

frames. The NPRM proposed to require 

repetitive inspections for cracking in the 

overwing frames, and corrective actions 

if necessary. We are issuing this AD to 

detect and correct such cracking, which 

could result in a severed frame and 

might increase the loading of adjacent 

frames, resulting in damage to the 

adjacent structure and consequent loss 

of structural integrity of the airplane. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. We 

have considered the comment received. 

Boeing stated that it supports the NPRM 

(78 FR 72836, December 4, 2013). 

Change to This Final Rule 

We revised paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this 

final rule to clarify that an operator that 

has already accomplished the 

inspections specified in Boeing Multi 

Operator Message (MOM) MOM–MOM– 

13–0375–01B, dated May 9, 2013, has a 

compliance time of within 9,300 flight 

cycles after those inspections were 

accomplished to do the actions required 

by paragraph (g) of this final rule. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comments received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

with the change described previously 

and minor editorial changes. We have 

determined that these minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 

72836, December 4, 2013) for correcting 

the unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 72836, 

December 4, 2013). 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 129 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators 

Inspections ............................. 22 work-hours × $85 per hour 

= $1,870 per inspection 

cycle.

$0 $1,870 per inspection cycle ... $241,230 per inspection cycle 

We estimate the following costs to do 

any necessary replacements that would 

be required based on the results of any 

inspection. We have no way of 

determining the number of aircraft that 

might need this replacement: 

ON-CONDITION COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Replacement of a frame station ................................... 126 work-hours × $85 per hour = $10,710 .................. $83,060 $93,770 

In addition, for the on-condition 

repairs specified in this AD, we have 

received no definitive data that would 

enable us to provide cost estimates. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

13532 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2014–05–22 The Boeing Company: 

Amendment 39–17795; Docket No. 

FAA–2013–0977; Directorate Identifier 

2013–NM–190–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective April 15, 2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to all The Boeing 

Company Model 717–200 airplanes, 

certificated in any category. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 53, Fuselage. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by multiple reports 

of cracking in the overwing frames. We are 

issuing this AD to detect and correct such 

cracking, which could result in a severed 

frame and might increase the loading of 

adjacent frames, resulting in damage to the 

adjacent structure and consequent loss of 

structural integrity of the airplane. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Inspections and Corrective Actions 

At the applicable time specified in 

paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, do a 

general visual inspection and a high 

frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection for 

cracking of the left-side and right-side 

overwing frames at station 737, and do all 

applicable corrective actions, in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717–53A0036, 

dated August 12, 2013, except as required by 

paragraph (h)(3) of this AD. Do all applicable 

corrective actions before further flight. 

Except as required by paragraph (h)(2) of this 

AD, repeat the inspections thereafter at the 

applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., 

‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 717–53A0036, dated August 12, 

2013. 

(1) For Group 1, Configuration 1 airplanes 

identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

717–53A0036, dated August 12, 2013: At the 

time specified in table 1 of paragraph 1.E., 

‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 717–53A0036, dated August 12, 

2013, except as provided by paragraph (h)(1) 

of this AD. 

(2) For Group 1, Configuration 2 airplanes 

identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

717–53A0036, dated August 12, 2013: At the 

applicable time specified in paragraph 

(g)(2)(i) or (g)(2)(ii) of this AD. 

(i) For airplanes on which the overwing 

frame has not been replaced: Within 9,300 

flight cycles after the inspections specified in 

Boeing Multi Operator Message (MOM) 

MOM–MOM–13–0375–01B, dated May 9, 

2013, were accomplished. 

(ii) For airplanes on which the overwing 

frame has been replaced: Within 12,000 flight 

cycles after replacing the frame. 

(h) Exceptions to Service Information 

Specifications 

(1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

717–53A0036, dated August 12, 2013, 

specifies a compliance time ‘‘after the 

original issue date of this service bulletin,’’ 

this AD requires compliance within the 

specified compliance time after the effective 

date of this AD. 

(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

717–53A0036, dated August 12, 2013, 

specifies to contact Boeing for the 

compliance time of an inspection repetitive 

interval, this AD requires a compliance time 

approved by the FAA in accordance with the 

procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this 

AD. 

(3) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

717–53A0036, dated August 12, 2013, 

specifies to contact Boeing for repair 

instructions, this AD requires repair before 

further flight using a method approved in 

accordance with the procedures specified in 

paragraph (j) of this AD. 

(i) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for only the 

initial general visual inspection, HFEC 

inspection, and frame replacement required 

by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions 

were performed before the effective date of 

this AD using Boeing Multi Operator Message 

MOM–MOM–13–0375–01B, dated May 9, 

2013, which is not incorporated by reference 

in this AD. 

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be 

emailed to: 9-ANM-LAACO-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane and 14 

CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) If the service information contains steps 

that are labeled as RC (Required for 

Compliance), those steps must be done to 

comply with this AD; any steps that are not 

labeled as RC are recommended. Those steps 

that are not labeled as RC may be deviated 

from, done as part of other actions, or done 

using accepted methods different from those 

identified in the specified service 

information without obtaining approval of an 

AMOC, provided the steps labeled as RC can 

be done and the airplane can be put back in 

a serviceable condition. Any substitutions or 

changes to steps labeled as RC require 

approval of an AMOC. 

(k) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact: Eric Schrieber, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, Los Angeles 

ACO, FAA, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 

Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; phone: 562–627– 

5348; fax: 562–627–5210; email: 

eric.schrieber@faa.gov. 

(2) Service information identified in this 

AD that is not incorporated by reference may 

be obtained at the addresses specified in 

paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD. 

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 13533 

(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717– 

53A0036, dated August 12, 2013. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC 

D800–0019, Long Beach, CA 90846–0001; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 2; fax 

206–766–5683; Internet https:// 

www.myboeingfleet.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http:// 

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington on February 

26, 2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–04841 Filed 3–10–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 97 

[Docket No. 30945; Amdt. No. 3579] 

Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums 

and Obstacle Departure Procedures; 

Miscellaneous Amendments 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, 

suspends, or revokes Standard 

Instrument Approach Procedures 

(SIAPs) and associated Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle Departure 

Procedures for operations at certain 

airports. These regulatory actions are 

needed because of the adoption of new 

or revised criteria, or because of changes 

occurring in the National Airspace 

System, such as the commissioning of 

new navigational facilities, adding new 

obstacles, or changing air traffic 

requirements. These changes are 

designed to provide safe and efficient 

use of the navigable airspace and to 

promote safe flight operations under 

instrument flight rules at the affected 

airports. 

DATES: This rule is effective March 11, 

2014. The compliance date for each 

SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, 

and ODP is specified in the amendatory 

provisions. 

The incorporation by reference of 

certain publications listed in the 

regulations is approved by the Director 

of the Federal Register as of March 11, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters 

incorporated by reference in the 

amendment is as follows: 

For Examination— 

1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA 

Headquarters Building, 800 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; 

2. The FAA Regional Office of the 

region in which the affected airport is 

located; 

3. The National Flight Procedures 

Office, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., 

Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or, 

4. The National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, 

or go to: http://www.archives.gov/

federal_register/code_of_federal_

regulations/ibr_locations.html. 

Availability—All SIAPs and Takeoff 

Minimums and ODPs are available 

online free of charge. Visit http://

www.nfdc.faa.gov to register. 

Additionally, individual SIAP and 

Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may 

be obtained from: 

1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA– 

200), FAA Headquarters Building, 800 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; or 

2. The FAA Regional Office of the 

region in which the affected airport is 

located. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard A. Dunham III, Flight Procedure 

Standards Branch (AFS–420), Flight 

Technologies and Programs Divisions, 

Flight Standards Service, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Mike 

Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 

South MacArthur Blvd. Oklahoma City, 

OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 

25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125) 

Telephone: (405) 954–4164. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule 

amends Title 14 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by 

establishing, amending, suspending, or 

revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums 

and/or ODPS. The complete regulators 

description of each SIAP and its 

associated Takeoff Minimums or ODP 

for an identified airport is listed on FAA 

form documents which are incorporated 

by reference in this amendment under 5 

U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 

CFR 97.20. The applicable FAA Forms 

are FAA Forms 8260–3, 8260–4, 8260– 

5, 8260–15A, and 8260–15B when 

required by an entry on 8260–15A. 

The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff 

Minimums and ODPs, in addition to 

their complex nature and the need for 

a special format make publication in the 

Federal Register expensive and 

impractical. Furthermore, airmen do not 

use the regulatory text of the SIAPs, 

Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead 

refer to their depiction on charts printed 

by publishers of aeronautical materials. 

The advantages of incorporation by 

reference are realized and publication of 

the complete description of each SIAP, 

Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on 

FAA forms is unnecessary. This 

amendment provides the affected CFR 

sections and specifies the types of SIAPs 

and the effective dates of the, associated 

Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This 

amendment also identifies the airport 

and its location, the procedure, and the 

amendment number. 

The Rule 

This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is 

effective upon publication of each 

separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and 

ODP as contained in the transmittal. 

Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and 

textual ODP amendments may have 

been issued previously by the FAA in a 

Flight Data Center (FDC) Notice to 

Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency 

action of immediate flight safety relating 

directly to published aeronautical 

charts. The circumstances which 

created the need for some SIAP and 

Takeoff Minimums and ODP 

amendments may require making them 

effective in less than 30 days. For the 

remaining SIAPS and Takeoff 

Minimums and ODPS, an effective date 

at least 30 days after publication is 

provided. 

Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff 

Minimums and ODPS contained in this 

amendment are based on the criteria 

contained in the U.S. Standard for 

Terminal Instrument Procedures 

(TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and 

Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the 

TERPS criteria were applied to the 

conditions existing or anticipated at the 

affected airports. Because of the close 

and immediate relationship between 

these SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and 

ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find 

that notice and public procedures before 

adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff 

Minimums and ODPs are impracticable 

and contrary to the public interest and, 

where applicable, that good cause exists 

for making some SIAPs effective in less 

than 30 days. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES