alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
700

800

700

750

800

850

750 650

750

750

750

800

750

750

700

750

750

800

850

750

750

359

359

359

R A N C H R D 2 0 5 0

R A N C H R D 2 0 5 0 R A N C H R D 2 0 5 0

359

359

359

R A N C H R D 2 0 5 0

R A N C H R D 2 0 5 0 R A N C H R D 2 0 5 0

Bruni

Thanksgiving

Oil Field

Cole Oil

Field

O'Hern

Oil Field

El Norte

Windmill

Encinos

Windmill

El Medio

Windmill

El de

Camino

Windmill

El Clemente

Windmill

Aguacalosa

Windmill

Oilton

Mills

Bennett SW

Bruni

Bruni SE Hebbronville Albercas

Ranch

San

Pablo

Hebbronville

NW

Parrilla

Creek SW

FEET

FEET

870 000FEET

98°45'

27°22'

47'30"

98°52'

98°

45'

27°

50'

98°

22'

30"

27° 30"

30'

47'

52'30"

27° 30'

30" 50'

30"

27'

25'

27'30" 30"

25'

17 070 000

900 000FEET

17 030000

E

000m

30

5

30

5

30

5

30

5

30

5

30

30

5 5

30

5

5

30

30

000m

30

5

5

30

30

30

5

30

5

30

5 5

30

5

000m

30

000m

5

30 30

30

30

5

30

5

5

5

30

30

30

5 5

29 N

18

39

23

15 16

33

20

36

35

31

E 20

17

30

19

39

22

29

23

38

19

24

17

32

37

13

34

40

34

22

30

32

16

41

24

35

38

21

31

40

N 41

18

33

14

36

14

37

13

21

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2798-234

BRUNI, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

BRUNI QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 5 ́

2 MILS

5° 19 ́

95 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

NR

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
#### § 375.25 Unauthorized operations.

No foreign civil aircraft shall be navigated in the United States unless authorized by this part. Commercial air operations (other than those authorized by § 375.36) shall not be undertaken without a permit issued by the Department.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:



In connection with this quarterly report of PharmaNetics, Inc.on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his/her knowledge:



1. This report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and



2. The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of PharmaNetics,
Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



Date: August 13,
2004



/s/ John P. FunkhouserJohn P. FunkhouserChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
§ 27.27 Center of gravity limits. The extreme forward and aft centers of gravity and, where critical, the extreme lateral centers of gravity must be established for each weight established under § 27.25. Such an extreme may not lie beyond— ( a ) The extremes selected by the applicant;
( b ) The extremes within which the structure is proven; or
( c ) The extremes within which compliance with the applicable flight requirements is shown.
[Amdt. 27-2, 33 FR 962, Jan. 26, 1968]
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CHAMBERS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 18137.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 31, 1960.

Jerome L. Avedon, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

George P. Ryan, Alan T. Nolan, Indianapolis, Ind., Frederick A. Kullman, New Orleans, La., Kullman *&*Lang, New Orleans, La., and Ross, McCord, Ice & Miller, Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel, for respondent.

Before HUTCHESON, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The labor union which was the certified bargaining agent for the production and maintenance employees of the Respondent, filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board that the Respondent was guilty of unfair labor practices under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. The union asserted that the Respondent had interfered with, restrained and coerced employees, and had refused to bargain in good faith. The Board found violations and entered a cease and desist order which, by its petition, it seeks to enforce. The Respondent insists that enforcement should be denied for want of substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings of interference, restraint and coercion, and of failure to bargain in good faith. The evidence has been examined and the Respondent’s contentions with respect to it have been reviewed. It is our considered conclu*716sion that the evidence is ample to sustain the Board’s findings.

The Board, or its General Counsel, refused to make available to the Respondent, in advance of the hearing, the statements which had been taken from employees, and the names of the employees from whom statements had been taken. Subpoenas were revoked which would have required the production of all statements taken in connection with the charges. The Respondent contends that in these matters it has been denied the benefit of basic procedural safeguards and that the Board’s order, therefore, cannot stand. It is apparent to us, and especially so since no prejudice to the Respondent is shown, that it was not deprived of a fair hearing.

The other questions raised by the Respondent have been considered and we do not find merit in them. The order of the Board will be

Enforced.
CL f\t I /I J_ RECEIVED IN JO ff'hPjl fiCOtyft COURT OFCRIMINALAPPEALS f FEB 26 2015 

## &W^^^^^^*1^ T5 ^ 

# -jk*V* Uo^StAcL^^h Ccf^ d>f toy out (Wl GwvTXe© ^ F^OCU^ 

## .ft. I^OOIXN LpOA Q/LH^, U**& ^-1\X\ 

### ^. y^Ji twi? ""^tO 

### q^oO BLtSS ^ 

# 3'L Dili'^5^v- -? '•••
§ 27.685 Control system details. ( a ) Each detail of each control system must be designed to prevent jamming, chafing, and interference from cargo, passengers, loose objects or the freezing of moisture.
( b ) There must be means in the cockpit to prevent the entry of foreign objects into places where they would jam the system.
( c ) There must be means to prevent the slapping of cables or tubes against other parts.
( d ) Cable systems must be designed as follows: ( 1 ) Cables, cable fittings, turnbuckles, splices, and pulleys must be of an acceptable kind.
( 2 ) The design of the cable systems must prevent any hazardous change in cable tension throughout the range of travel under any operating conditions and temperature variations.
( 3 ) No cable smaller than three thirty-seconds of an inch diameter may be used in any primary control system.
( 4 ) Pulley kinds and sizes must correspond to the cables with which they are used. The pulley cable combinations and strength values which must be used are specified in Military Handbook MIL-HDBK-5C, Vol. 1 & Vol. 2, Metallic Materials and Elements for Flight Vehicle Structures, (Sept. 15, 1976, as amended through December 15, 1978). This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. section 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from the Naval Publications and Forms Center, 5801 Tabor Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19120. Copies may be inspected at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html*
( 5 ) Pulleys must have close fitting guards to prevent the cables from being displaced or fouled.
( 6 ) Pulleys must lie close enough to the plane passing through the cable to prevent the cable from rubbing against the pulley flange.
( 7 ) No fairlead may cause a change in cable direction of more than 3°.
( 8 ) No clevis pin subject to load or motion and retained only by cotter pins may be used in the control system.
( 9 ) Turnbuckles attached to parts having angular motion must be installed to prevent binding throughout the range of travel.
( 10 ) There must be means for visual inspection at each fairlead, pulley, terminal, and turnbuckle.
( e ) Control system joints subject to angular motion must incorporate the following special factors with respect to the ultimate bearing strength of the softest material used as a bearing: ( 1 ) 3.33 for push-pull systems other than ball and roller bearing systems.
( 2 ) 2.0 for cable systems.
( f ) For control system joints, the manufacturer's static, non-Brinell rating of ball and roller bearings must not be exceeded.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-11, 41 FR 55469, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 8001, Mar. 6, 1990; 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004; Doc. No. FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 27-49, 83 FR 9170, Mar. 5, 2018]
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of the Company**

 

Thefollowing is a list of subsidiaries of the Company as of February 28,2006, omitting certain subsidiaries that, when considered in the aggregate as asingle subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.  Each of the following subsidiaries doesbusiness under the name 24/7 Real Media.

 
| **Legal  Name**                      | ** ** | **Law of Incorporation or Organization** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|
| ** **                           | ** ** | ** **                               |
| 24/7 Real Media  US, Inc.       |       | Delaware                                 |
| 24/7 Media  Canada Holding Company   |       | Nova Scotia                              |
| 24/7  Canada, Inc.              |       | Ontario                                  |
| 24/7 Real Media  France SARL         |       | France                                   |
| 24/7 Real Media  Germany Gmbh        |       | Germany                                  |
| 24/7 Real Media  Italy S.R.L.        |       | Italy                                    |
| Real Media Spain                     |       | Spain                                    |
| Real Media  Scandinavia              |       | Sweden                                   |
| 24/7 Real Media  Europe Holding S.A. |       | Switzerland                              |
| 24/7 Real Media  Technology S.A.     |       | Switzerland                              |
| 24/7 Real Media  UK Ltd              |       | United Kingdom                           |
| 24/7 Real  Media, Inc.          |       | Korea                                    |
| K.K. 24-7 Search                     |       | Japan                                    |
| 24/7 Real Media  Pty Limited         |       | Australia                                |
| Decide Holdings  Pty Limited         |       | Australia                                |

 

----
#### Lockhart *v.*The State.

Larceny,

(Decided February 8, 1916.

70 South. 980.)

Larceny; Evidence; Jury Question. — Under the evidence in this case it was for the jury to determine whether or not defendant was guilty of the larceny of the suit of clothes.

Appeal from Limestone Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. R. C. Brickell.

Willie Lockhart was convicted of larceny, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney. General, and H. G. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

THOMAS, J.

Appellant was convicted of stealing a suit of clothes. The testimony for the state showed that the suit of clothes testified to have been stolen was kept by the owner, one Turner Coger, at the home of one Dan Andrews, where he lived; that the defendant, who complainéd of being sick, was, at noonday, left lying on the porch of this home by the occupants, who went off to the field to work; that, upon the return of one of them in about an hour and a half, the defendant was gone, likewise the suit of clothes; that a trunk in the house was found to have been broken open in the interim, and there was missing from it some money; that defendant left that section, and was not seen again for over a year. The defendant offered no evidence, but moved to exclude that offered by the state, and re*40quested the affirmative charge, upon the theory that the corpus delicti had not been proved.

We are of opinion that the court did not err in overruling the motion and in refusing the *charge.*—Perry *v. State,*155 Ala. 93, 46 South. 470; *Ryan v. State,*100 Ala. 94; *Smith v. State,*133 Ala. 150, 31 South. 806, 91 Am. St. Rep. 21; *Finney v. State,*10 Ala. App. 39, 65 South. 93; *Perry v. State,*11 Ala. App. 196, 65 South. 683; *Wilson v. State,*13 Ala. App. 58, 69 South. 295; *Merriwether v. Tuscaloosa,*13 Ala. App. 651, 69 South. 258.

No other questions are presented by the record.

Judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### § 372.3 Waiver.

A waiver of any of the provisions of this part may be granted by the Department upon its own initiative, or upon the submission by a charter operator of a written request therefor: *Provided,* That such a waiver is in the public interest and it appears to the Department that special or unusual circumstances warrant a departure from the provisions set forth herein.

[SPR-54, 37 FR 11163, June 3, 1972, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15938, Apr. 16, 2019]
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the companys most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter reasonably likely to
materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of the internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or the
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  /s/ Barry A. SullivanBarry A. SullivanChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Allan J. Ligi, President of VOS International, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of VOS International, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:

> 
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such  disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that  material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated  Subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the  period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report;  and  c) disclosed in this report any changes in the small business issuer's internal control  over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent  fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee ofsmall business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

> 
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or  operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and  report financial information; and   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who  have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial  reporting.

Date: February 2, 2006                                 /s/Allan J.Ligi                                                                                             AllanJ. Ligi                                                                           President,Principal Executive officer

----
§ 25.703 Takeoff warning system. A takeoff warning system must be installed and must meet the following requirements: ( a ) The system must provide to the pilots an aural warning that is automatically activated during the initial portion of the takeoff roll if the airplane is in a configuration, including any of the following, that would not allow a safe takeoff: ( 1 ) The wing flaps or leading edge devices are not within the approved range of takeoff positions.
( 2 ) Wing spoilers (except lateral control spoilers meeting the requirements of § 25.671), speed brakes, or longitudinal trim devices are in a position that would not allow a safe takeoff.
( b ) The warning required by paragraph (a) of this section must continue until— ( 1 ) The configuration is changed to allow a safe takeoff;
( 2 ) Action is taken by the pilot to terminate the takeoff roll;
( 3 ) The airplane is rotated for takeoff; or
( 4 ) The warning is manually deactivated by the pilot.
( c ) The means used to activate the system must function properly throughout the ranges of takeoff weights, altitudes, and temperatures for which certification is requested.
[Amdt. 25-42, 43 FR 2323, Jan. 16, 1978]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11053]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Housing Service


Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) Inviting Applications for the 
Rural Community Development Initiative (RCDI); Correction

AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Rural Housing Service (RHS) corrects a notice published 
March 17, 2000 (65 FR 14525). This action is taken to correct the 
definition of ``low-income community''.
    Accordingly, the notice published March 17, 2000 (65 FR 14525), is 
corrected as follows:
    On page 14525 in the third column under ``Definitions for RCDI 
Purposes'', the definition for ``Low-income community'' should read 
``Low-income community--a city, town, village, county, parish, borough, 
or federally recognized Indian tribe with a median household income at, 
or below, 80 percent of the statewide median household income.''

    Dated: April 26, 2000.
Inga Smulkstys,
Acting Under Secretary, Rural Development.
[FR Doc. 00-11053 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XV-P
----

EXHIBIT 99.7 

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE 

Gildan Activewear Inc. (the "Corporation") is filing itsannual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 (the"Report") with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 

I, Glenn J. Chamandy, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enactedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofmy knowledge: 

1.                    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theU.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2.                    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Dated: December 19, 2007 

/s/ *Glenn J. Chamandy*                                                Name:         Glenn J. Chamandy Title:           President andChief Executive Officer 

----

**CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**
Gildan Activewear Inc. (the "Corporation") is filing itsannual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 (the"Report") with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 

I, Laurence G. Sellyn, Executive Vice-President, Finance andChief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

1.                   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theU.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
2.                   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
Dated: December 19, 2007 

/s/ *Laurence G. Sellyn*                                                                Name:         Laurence G. Sellyn Title:           ExecutiveVice-President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer