alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 88 (Friday, May 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11276]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences: Committee of 
Visitors; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences (1110).
    Date and Time: July 19-21, 2000.
    Place: Room 630, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Part-open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Samuel Scheiner, Division of Environmental 
Biology, Room 635, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1480.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support
    Agenda: Closed Session: July 19, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; July 
20, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-1 p.m. and 3-5 p.m.; July 21 9:30 a.m.-5 p.m.; 
review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Open Session: July 20, 2000, 2-3 p.m. discussion on research 
trends, opportunities and assessment procedures in the Systematic 
and Population Biology Cluster.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personnel information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b. (c)(4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 2, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-11276 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial properly such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Deafness and Other Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.                              ( print page 30422)    

*Date:*                         June 16, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Westin Fairfax Hotel, 2100 Massachusetts Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20008.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Craig A. Jordan, Chief, Scientific Review Branch, NIH/NIDCD/DER, Executive Plaza South, Room 400C, Bethesda, MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 4, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-11766  Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 375.44 Issuance of permit. ( a ) The Department will issue a foreign aircraft permit if it finds that the proposed operations meet the requirements of this part and are in the public interest. Foreign aircraft permits may be conditioned or limited by the Department. Permits must be carried aboard the applicant's aircraft during flight over U.S. territory, and are not transferable.
( b ) In determining whether to grant a particular application, the Department will consider, among other factors, the extent to which the country of the applicant's nationality deals with U.S. civil aircraft operators on the basis of substantial reciprocity, and whether the operation is otherwise in the public interest.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WENDY THOMAS; SERVICE

EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION,

LOCAL 721;

Plaintiffs-Appellants/

Cross-Appellees,

v.

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; LARRY

GROTEFEND, individually; DENNIS

ERICK SCHERTELL, individually;

RICK HALL, individually; BRIAN

MCARTHUR, individually; HEATHER

WOODS, individually; MARGIE

GEMENDE, individually;

Defendants-Appellees/

Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 12-55470

12-55812

D.C. No.

5:10-CV-01846-

VAP-DTB

ORDER

Filed January 8, 2015

Before: Alex Kozinski and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit

Judges, and Jed S. Rakoff, Senior District Judge.

*

* The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by

designation.
2 THOMAS V. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

ORDER

The Opinion filed on August 18, 2014, and published at

763 F.3d 1167, is hereby amended as follows:

On page 9 of the slip opinion, replace “moot.1” with

“moot as to the County of Riverside, Grotefend, Schertell,

Hall, and Woods.1

 With regards to Gemende and McArthur,

we remand for the district court to determine whether they are

entitled to attorneys’ fees in light of the lack of evidence that

they had any supervisory authority over Thomas.”

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the

petition for panel rehearing. Judges Kozinski and Clifton vote

to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Rakoff

so recommends. The full court has been advised of the

petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has

requested a vote on en banc rehearing. See Fed. R. App. P.

35(f).

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for

rehearing en banc are denied. No further petitions for panel

rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-31471

Summary Calendar

 

ANDREW MCGRAW,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN; RICHARD L. STALDER; UNKNOWN DIFFATTA, Doctor; 

UNKNOWN HANDS, Doctor; UNKNOWN GUTIERREZ; UNKNOWN TARVER;

UNKNOWN DURRETT; UNKNOWN BARNES; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE;

JOHN DOE; PAT TRUETT,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CV-725-B

--------------------

May 23, 2002

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Andrew McGraw, Louisiana prisoner # 295773, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as

frivolous and for failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1997e(e) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). McGraw

alleged in the district court and on appeal that he is being

handcuffed with his hands behind his back, that he suffers from
No. 01-31471

-2-

various medical conditions, that being handcuffed in such a way

could cause injuries and causes his hands to swell and become

numb, that he once fell and suffered injuries, that the

defendants knew about his medical problems and the problems with

being handcuffed in such a manner but did nothing, and that he is

being handcuffed in such a manner and brutalized as retaliation

for having committed violations of prison policies of which he

was falsely accused. 

The injuries McGraw alleged he suffered or might suffer are

de minimis and do not establish a claim for 42 U.S.C. § 1983

relief. See Harper v. Showers, 174 F.3d 716, 719 (5th Cir.

1999); Siglar v. Hightower, 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Furthermore, McGraw does not challenge the district court’s

determination that his claims at best alleged only negligence and

not deliberate indifference. McGraw’s claims of retaliation are

conclusory and also do not establish a viable claim for relief. 

See Woods v. Edwards, 51 F.3d 577, 580-81 (5th Cir. 1995). 

The district court’s dismissal of McGraw’s complaint is

AFFIRMED. His request for the production of documents is DENIED.
§ 298.38 Financial security arrangements for operating Public Charters. When an air taxi operator or commuter air carrier performs a Public Charter under part 380 of this chapter, either: ( a ) The air taxi operator or commuter air carrier shall meet the bonding or escrow requirements applicable to certificated air carriers as set forth in § 212.8 of this chapter; or
( b ) The air taxi operator or commuter air carrier shall ensure that it does not receive any payments for the charter until after the charter has been completed. In this case, its contracts with the charter operator and the charter operator's depository bank, if any, shall state that the charter operator or bank, as applicable, shall retain control of and responsibility for all participant funds intended for payment for air transportation until after the charter has been completed, notwithstanding any provision of part 380 of this chapter.
§ 29.1181 Designated fire zones: regions included. ( a ) Designated fire zones are— ( 1 ) The engine power section of reciprocating engines;
( 2 ) The engine accessory section of reciprocating engines;
( 3 ) Any complete powerplant compartment in which there is no isolation between the engine power section and the engine accessory section, for reciprocating engines;
( 4 ) Any auxiliary power unit compartment;
( 5 ) Any fuel-burning heater and other combustion equipment installation described in § 29.859;
( 6 ) The compressor and accessory sections of turbine engines; and
( 7 ) The combustor, turbine, and tailpipe sections of turbine engine installations except sections that do not contain lines and components carrying flammable fluids or gases and are isolated from the designated fire zone prescribed in paragraph (a)(6) of this section by a firewall that meets § 29.1191.
( b ) Each designated fire zone must meet the requirements of §§ 29.1183 through 29.1203.
[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 970, Jan. 26, 1968, as amended by Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34219, Sept. 2, 1988]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              10
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          42,678
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        131,729
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,410
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                247
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               14
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     172,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 172,410
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,464
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   318
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,782
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,782
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   (80)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,862
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,496
<EPS-BASIC>                                     34,960
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   34,960
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.92
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,608
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,855
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,855
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,855
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit A

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3180-1 Filed:05/30/18 Entered:05/30/18 12:29:24 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, 

 as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, 

et al.

 Debtors.1

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, 

 as representative of 

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER 

AUTHORITY 

 Debtor. 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 4780-LTS 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DIRECTING THE APPOINTMENT OF AN OFFICIAL 

COMMITTEE OF RETIRED EMPLOYEES IN PREPA’S TITLE III CASE 

 

1 The Debtors in these jointly-administered PROMESA title III cases, along with each Debtor’s respective 

title III case number listed as a bankruptcy case number due to software limitations and the last four (4) 

digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are: (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico 

Sales Tax Financing Corporation (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric and Power Authority (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3180-1 Filed:05/30/18 Entered:05/30/18 12:29:24 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 3
2 

 Upon consideration of the Motion of Official Committee of Retired Employees of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Regarding Representation of PREPA Retirees, filed May 14, 2018, 

requesting entry of an order providing for the representation of the retirees of the Puerto Rico 

Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”), it is: 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1102(a)(4), made applicable in this case by section 301(a) 

of PROMESA, 48 U.S.C. § 2161(a), the United States Trustee is directed to expand the 

membership of the Official Committee of Retired Employees of the Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico to ensure the adequate representation of retired employees in PREPA’s Title III case. 

2. [Alternative Relief] Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1102(a)(2), made applicable in this case 

by section 301(a) of PROMESA, 48 U.S.C. § 2161(a), the United States Trustee is directed to 

appoint an official committee of retired employees in PREPA’s Title III case. 

3. This Court retains exclusive jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or 

related to the implementation, interpretation, and enforcement of this Order. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________, 2018 

 ____________________________________ 

 HON. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3180-1 Filed:05/30/18 Entered:05/30/18 12:29:24 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 3 of 3
Variability in Biosolids Mercury Concentrations at POTWs, 2005 - 2009

0

1

2

3

4

5

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X

Publicly Owned Treatment Works

Merc

ury

Conce

ntration, 

mg/kg

max = 14.65 max = 17.25

max = 6.40 

max = 6.10
Variability in Biosolids Lead Concentrations at POTWs, 2005 - 2009

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X

Publicly Owned Treatment Works

Lead 

Conce

ntration, 

mg/kg
* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause therefore is ordered

submitted without oral argument.

PUBLISH

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 5/8/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

GERALD MARSHAL PAYNE,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-5102

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

(D.C. No. 94-CR-150-1-BU)

Submitted on the briefs:*

Richard D. White, Jr. of White, Hack and Duke, P.A., Tulsa, Oklahoma, for DefendantAppellant.

Stephen C. Lewis, United States Attorney, and Allen J. Litchfield, Assistant United States

Attorney, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before PORFILIO, McKAY and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

KELLY, Circuit Judge.
- 2 -

Mr. Payne was convicted of two counts of counts of carjacking, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 2119,

based on a scheme where the victim would be abducted and forced to make cash withdrawals

with an ATM card. He now appeals. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we

affirm.

Carjacking requires the government to prove that “the defendant, (1) while possessing

a firearm, (2) took from the person or presence of another (3) by force and violence or

intimidation (4) a motor vehicle which had moved in interstate or foreign commerce.”

United States v. Singleton, 16 F.3d 1419, 1422 (5th Cir. 1994) (footnote omitted). Accord

United States v. Moore, 43 F.3d 568, 572 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 212 (1995).

Mr. Payne maintains that the government failed to prove element (2), that he took a motor

vehicle. According to Mr. Payne, the taking element requires an intent to steal or

permanently deprive the victim of the motor vehicle, an intent which he lacked when he and

his cohorts abducted their victims, commandeered their vehicles, and then abandoned those

vehicles once the criminal purpose of the venture was achieved or thwarted by the victim.

We disagree. Carjacking is a general intent crime analogous to robbery. United States

v. Martinez, 49 F.3d 1398, 1401 (9th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 749 (1996); United

States v. Harris, 25 F.3d 1275, 1279-80 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 458 (1994). An

intent to permanently deprive a victim of a motor vehicle is not required by the “taking”

element. United States v. Moore, 73 F.3d 666, 669 (6th Cir. 1996); see also United States
- 3 -

v. Lewis, 628 F.2d 1276, 1278-79 (10th Cir. 1980) (bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)

did not require any more than temporary taking of funds), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 924 (1981).

The carjacker’s motive for stealing the vehicle, be it for profit, convenience or as an

instrumentality of another crime, is irrelevant. Harris, 25 F.3d at 1280. When judged against

these standards and in the light most favorable to the government, Jackson v. Virginia, 443

U.S. 307, 319 (1979), the evidence is sufficient.

AFFIRMED.
#### William Zeigler, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error.

Writ of error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County.

Writ of error dismissed on June 11th, 1912, on motion of Attorney General.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11798]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Asthma Disease Management, Inc.; Order of 
Suspension of Trading

    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Asthma Disease Management, Inc., a Nevada corporation, with its 
principal place of business in Berlin, New Jersey. Questions have been 
raised about the adequacy and accuracy of publicly disseminated 
information, concerning, among other things, purported contracts 
between Asthma Disease Management, Inc. and three health maintenance 
organizations: Cape Health Plan (f/k/a Cape Medical) of Detroit, 
Michigan; Horizon Mercy of Trenton, New Jersey; and HMA of 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, May 8, 2000, 
through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on May 19, 2000.

    By the Commission.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11798 Filed 5-8-00; 12:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
*No.*17,315.

#### Willis et al *v.*Citizens’ Building, Loan and Savings Association.

*Filed*Apr. 30, 1895.

Prom the Huntington Circuit Court.

*J. M. Katfield, M. L. Spencer*and *W. A. Branyan,*for appellants.

*J. B. Kenner*and *XI. S. Lesh,*for appellee.

Jordan, J.

— This case is one of a series appealed to this court. It involves the same questions for consideration as were decided by this court in the appeal of *Wohlford*v. *Citizens' Building, Loan and Savings*Asso., 140 Ind. 662, and upon the authority of that case the judgment ■ought to be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.