alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31995D0002 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995D0002

**95/2/Euratom, ECSC: Council Decision of 1 January 1995 determining the order in which the office of President of the Council shall be held **

*
Official Journal L 001 , 01/01/1995 P. 0220 - 0220 *

COUNCIL DECISION

of 1 January 1995

determining the order in which the office of President of the Council shall be held

(95/2/EC, Euratom, ECSC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 27 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 146 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 116 thereof,

Whereas Article 12 of the Act annexed to the Treaty concerning the Accession of the Kingdom of Norway, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union adjusted the above provisions, laying down that the Council shall determine the order in which the office of President of the Council shall be held in turn by the Member States,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1. The office of President shall be held:

- for the first six months of 1995 by France,

- for the second six months of 1995 by Spain,

- for the subsequent periods of six months by the following Member States in turn in the following order: Italy, Ireland, Netherlands, Luxembourg, United Kingdom, Austria, Germany, Finland, Portugal, France, Sweden, Belgium, Spain, Denmark, Greece.

2. The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Member States concerned, may decide that a Member State may hold the Presidency during a period other than that resulting from the above order.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 1 January 1995.

For the Council

The President

A. JUPPÉ
#### Cooley Trading Company, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Samuel R. Goetz, Appellant.

(Argued September 28, 1936;

decided September 30, 1936.)

*Edward C. Schlenker*for motion.

*Jules C. Randal*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, unless undertaking is given and filed and return is filed and served and appellant pays ten dollars costs within ten days, in which event the motion is denied.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4435 

To prohibit the closure of postal facilities during the COVID–19 public 

health emergency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 4, 2020 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the closure of postal facilities during the 

COVID–19 public health emergency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Our Services 

5 Today Act of 2020’’ or the ‘‘POST Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON POSTAL FACILITY CLOSURES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—During the COVID–19 public 

8 health emergency period, the United States Postal Service 

9 may not close any facility of the Postal Service. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4435 IS

1 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

2 term ‘‘COVID–19 public health emergency period’’— 

3 (1) means the period of the public health emer4 gency declared by the Secretary of Health and 

5 Human Services under section 319 of the Public 

6 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d) with respect to 

7 COVID–19, including any renewal of that declara8 tion; and 

9 (2) includes any part of the period described in 

10 paragraph (1) that occurred before the date of en11 actment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[No. 49126-1-I.

Division One.

October 21, 2002.]

#### Helen Lamarche, *Appellant,*v. The Boeing Company, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 00-2-07811-1, Palmer Robinson, J., entered July 30, 2001. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Cox, A.C.J., concurred in by Agid and Schindler, JJ.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEFFERY KELCE, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. S. CERVANTES, Appeals Coordinator; et al., Defendants - Appellees. No. 04-15601 D.C. No. CV-01-02350-DFL/JFM
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 6, 2009 San Francisco, California Before: HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, ** District Judge. Jeffrey Kelce, a former California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Kelce alleged that 

# FILED
JUN 01 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 defendants violated his constitutional rights by denying him access to the courts and depriving him of his property. Ke lce also challenged certain regulations governing the California state prison grievance process as unconstitutional. The parties on appeal agreed that Kelce had unexhausted remedies for his claims under the California Tort Claims Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 900 et seq . In view of the posture of the case, we re mand the case to the district court with directions to hold this action in abeyan ce while Kelce pursues his remedies under the California Tort Claims Act. After th e resolution of those claims, the district court shall conduct any fu rther appropriate proceedings to determine any remaining issues in this case. We need not, and do not, reach any other issue urged by the parties on appeal.

REMANDED.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 3, 2009 

# Order

December 3, 2009

139359 & (22)

CAROL J. BURKARD, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 139359 v CoA: 290950 Washtenaw CC: 07-1348-NF WESTFIELD INSURA NCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipula tion signed by the atto rneys for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leav e to appeal is considered and, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application fo r leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
#### § 303.07 Transitional rule.

If a section 41309 application or a request for antitrust immunity under section 41308 is pending on May 16, 2019, such application or request shall be deemed made pursuant to the provisions of this part as amended May 16, 2019.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15937, Apr. 16, 2019]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., 

Debtors.

1

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

Re: ECF No. 3893

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES UNDER

ORDER REGARDING CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY THE COURT 

ON AUGUST 27, 2018

Upon the Urgent Joint Motion for Extension of Deadlines (the “Extension Motion”);

2

and 

the Court having found it has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to PROMESA 

section 306; and it appearing that venue in this district is proper pursuant to PROMESA section 

307; and the Court having found that the relief requested in the Extension Motion is in the best 

interests of the AAFAF and Vicéns-Rivera; and the Court having found that the AAFAF and 

Vicéns-Rivera provided adequate and appropriate notice of the Extension Motion under the 

circumstances and that no other or further notice is required; and the Court having reviewed the 

Extension Motion; and the Court having determined that the factual bases set forth in the Extension 

 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last four 

(4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales 

Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of 

the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to 

software limitations).

2 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Extension Motion. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3938-1 Filed:09/17/18 Entered:09/17/18 16:30:59 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 1 of 2
Motion establish just cause for the relief granted herein; and after due deliberation and sufficient 

cause appearing therefor, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Extension Motion is granted as set forth herein. 

2. The deadline for AAFAF and Vicéns-Rivera to file the joint status report on the 

matters specified in the Scheduling Order shall be extended to September 19, 2018. 

3. This Order resolves docket entry no. _____ in Case No. 17-3283-LTS, docket entry no. 

Dated: ___________, 2018

___________________________________

HONORABLE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3938-1 Filed:09/17/18 Entered:09/17/18 16:30:59 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: February 10-11, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: John C. Chah, PHD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Health, NCCAM, Building 31, 
Room 5B50, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-4334, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5cfcacdcbc6e5cac18bcbcccd8bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="650f0a0d0b06250a014b0b0c0d4b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 10, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-1136 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 398.4 Equipment. ( a ) Except in Alaska, service will be provided by aircraft offering at least 15 passenger seats, unless: ( 1 ) Average daily enplanements at the place did not exceed 11 passengers for any fiscal year from 1976 through 1986;
( 2 ) The requirement would necessitate the payment of compensation in a fiscal year for service at the place when compensation would otherwise not be necessary; or
( 3 ) The affected community agrees in writing to the use of smaller aircraft to provide service at the place.
( b ) The aircraft must have at least two engines and use two pilots, unless scheduled air transportation has not been provided to the place in aircraft with at least two engines and using two pilots for at least 60 consecutive operating days at any time since October 31, 1978.
( c ) The aircraft must be pressurized when the service regularly involves flights above 8,000 feet in altitude.
( d ) All aircraft must meet the applicable safety standards of the Federal Aviation Administration.
( e ) The aircraft must be conveniently accessible to passengers by stairs rather than over the wing.
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (NOPR) TECHNICAL

SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD):

Energy Conservation Standards for General Service Fluorescent Lamps and

Incandescent Reflector Lamps

January 12, 2009

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585

EE-2006-STD-0131 COMMENT 37.2
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc., and Lighting Research Center

EE-2006-STD-0131 COMMENT 37.2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5


<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 1st Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                        (3,675)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  7,725
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              (7,725)
<OTHER-SE>                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               0
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       3,675
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      (3,675)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                          (3,675)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          (3,675)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.00)




</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4403 

To amend the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 to include 

California in the program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2020 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 

to include California in the program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NUTRIA ERADICATION. 

4 The Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 

5 (Public Law 108–16) is amended— 

6 (1) in section 2— 

7 (A) in subsection (a)— 

8 (i) in paragraph (1), by striking 

9 ‘‘Wetlands and tidal marshes of the Chesa10 peake Bay and in Louisiana’’ and inserting 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4403 IS

1 ‘‘Wetlands, tidal marshes, and agricultural 

2 lands’’; 

3 (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘in 

4 Maryland and Louisiana’’; and 

5 (iii) by amending paragraph (3) to 

6 read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(3) Traditional harvest methods to control or 

8 eradicate nutria have failed. Consequently, marsh 

9 loss, loss of public and private wetlands, and loss of 

10 agricultural lands are accelerating.’’; and 

11 (B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘the 

12 State of Maryland and the State of Louisiana’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘any State that has demonstrated 

14 the need’’; and 

15 (2) in section 3— 

16 (A) by amending subsection (a) to read as 

17 follows: 

18 ‘‘(a) GRANT AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Inte19 rior (referred to in this Act as the ‘Secretary’), may pro20 vide financial assistance to a State, in an amount that is 

21 in proportion to the total impacted area of such State af22 fected by nutria, that has demonstrated to the Secretary 

23 sufficient need for a program to implement measures to 

24 eradicate or control nutria and restore marshland, public 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4403 IS

1 and private wetlands, and agricultural lands damaged by 

2 nutria.’’; 

3 (B) by striking subsection (b); 

4 (C) in subsection (d)— 

5 (i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the 

6 program may’’ and inserting ‘‘a State pro7 gram referred to in subsection (a) may’’; 

8 and 

9 (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘the 

10 program may’’ and inserting ‘‘a State pro11 gram referred to in subsection (a) may’’; 

12 (D) in subsection (e), by inserting ‘‘to a 

13 State’’ after ‘‘provided’’; 

14 (E) in subsection (f), by striking 

15 ‘‘$4,000,000’’ and all that follows and inserting 

16 ‘‘$12,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 

17 through 2025.’’; and 

18 (F) by redesignating subsections (c) 

19 through (f) as subsections (b) through (e). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>            5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2,192
<SECURITIES>                                   3,599
<RECEIVABLES>                                 44,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                   6,686
<INVENTORY>                                   28,956
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             154,623
<PP&E>                                        38,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                26,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               404,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         98,178
<BONDS>                                       88,619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         246
<OTHER-SE>                                   143,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 404,379
<SALES>                                      228,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             228,175
<CGS>                                        201,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                242,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (25,348)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (6,724)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (18,624)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (18,624)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.77)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

Actuate Corporation: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-164702, 333-159904, 333-151004, 333-143235, 333-134140,333-124546, 333-113545, 333-104101, 333-84582, 333-62600, 333-56906, 333-33720, 333-73015, and 333-59959) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-67220 and 333-34410) on Form S-3 of Actuate Corporation of our report dated March 10,2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Actuate Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31,2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Actuate Corporation. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Mountain View, California 

March 10, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

KEITH SMITH,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 297 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
exv10w6







EXHIBIT 10.6




CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED: Certain portions of this
document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential
treatment and, where applicable, have been marked with an asterisk ("[****]")
to denote where omissions have been made. The confidential material has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




EVERGREEN SOLAR, INC.




Amendment effective on or about August 3, 2009




to Master Supply Agreement with




Wagner & Co Solartechnik GmbH dated June 18, 2008



The following prices shall be effective [****]:





	 	•	 	[****]: €[****]
	 
	 	•	 	[****]: €[****]
	 
	 	•	 	[****]: €[****]
	 
	 	•	 	[****]: €[****]
	 
	 	•	 	[****]: €[****]
	 
	 	•	 	[****]: €[****]





	 	 	 
	Evergreen Solar, Inc.

	 	Wagner & Co Solartechnik GmbH