alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT00-28-000]

Take notice that on April 28, 2000, Great Lake Gas Transmission Limited Partnership (Great Lakes) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, proposed to become effective January 1, 2000:

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 3

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 3A Fourth

Revised Sheet No. 3B Fourth

Revised Sheet No. 3C

Great Lakes states that the tariff sheets listed above are being filed to revise the system and zone maps included in Great Lakes' tariff pursuant to 154.106(c) of the Commission's regulations. The revisions to the maps reflect the addition of the China meter station to Great Lakes' system, horsepower changes for two compressor stations, and other minor corrections.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11353 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### John Roberts, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error.

Writ of error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Liberty County.

Writ of error dismissed on November 7th, 1912, on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error.

R. H. Buford and Amos E. Lewis, for Plaintiff in Error.

Park Trammell, Attorney General, for the State.
#### Laurence H. Rutland, Respondent, *v.*Henry F. Thurston, Appellant.

Argued January 18, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*544
      *James J. Sullivan*for appellant.

*J. Carl Fogle*and *Harry L. Gilrie*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

' Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Loughran. JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J., Finch and Rippey, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gjelosh Joseph Rukaj, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 167]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered June 3, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*408Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the People did not present legally sufficient evidence to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245). In any event, the defendant’s contention is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see, CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
§ 325.4 State and local participation. ( a ) DOT, on a periodic basis, will send a questionnaire to each eligible place that is served by not more than one certificated air carrier, or is designated as an eligible place under 49 U.S.C. 41731, or for which DOT is reviewing its essential air service needs. The questionnaire will be addressed to: ( 1 ) The chief executive of the principal city, or other unit of local government at the affected place, that is named or has been previously named in a qualifying section 41102 certificate. For places in Alaska or Hawaii that are named DOT as eligible place without having been listed on a section 41102 certificate, the principal city is the most populous municipality at the place;
( 2 ) The individual or entity with direct supervision over and responsibility for the airport at the eligible place; and
( 3 ) The State agency with jurisdiction over air transportation in the State containing the eligible place. If there is no such State agency, the questionnaire will be sent to the governor of that State.
( b ) Within 60 days after receipt of the questionnaire, five copies of the response shall be filed in the Docket Operations Office, unless the Department specifies another date. If no response is received within the period, essential air service for that eligible place may temporarily be set at the minimum level prescribed in 49 U.S.C. 41737.
( c ) Any other interested person may, during the 60-day response period, submit information relevant to the essential air service level of that eligible place by filing in the Docket Operations Office, five copies of a document titled with the name of the place involved.
( d ) As necessary, the DOT may request additional information to supplement the questionnaire.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3024-0037) [Docket No. 82, 50 FR 2434, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15938, Apr. 16, 2019]
Presidential Documents

2279

Federal Register

Vol. 65, No. 9

Thursday, January 13, 2000

Title 3—

The President

Memorandum of January 5, 2000

Delegation of Authority Under Sections 1402 and 1406 of the

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000

(Public Law 106–65)

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United

States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate

to the Secretary of Defense the duties and responsibilities vested in the

President by sections 1402 and 1406 of the National Defense Authorization

Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (‘‘the Act’’) (Public Law 106–65).

The Department of Defense shall prepare the report required by section

1402 of the Act with the assistance of the Department of State, the Department

of Commerce, the Department of Energy, the Department of the Treasury,

the Director of Central Intelligence, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The Department of Defense shall obtain concurrence on the report from

the following agencies: the Department of State, the Department of Commerce,

the Director of Central Intelligence on behalf of the Intelligence Community,

the Department of the Treasury, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation

prior to submission to the Congress.

The Departments of Defense and Energy shall jointly prepare the report

required by section 1406 of the Act with the assistance of the Department

of State, the Department of Commerce, and the Director of Central Intelligence. The Departments of Defense and Energy shall obtain concurrence

on the report from the following agencies: the Department of State, the

Department of Commerce, and the Director of Central Intelligence on behalf

of the Intelligence Community prior to submission to the Congress.

Any reference in this memorandum to the provisions of any Act shall

be deemed to be a reference to such Act or its provisions as may be

amended from time to time.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal

[FR Doc. 00–1015

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, January 5, 2000.

.

œ–

Filed 1–12–00; 8:45 am]

Billing code 5001–10–M
#### § 297.5 Foreign air freight forwarder as agent.

A foreign air freight forwarder may act as agent of a shipper, or of a direct air carrier that has authorized such agency, if it expressly reserves the option to do so when the shipment is accepted. A foreign air freight forwarder shall not act as the agent of any direct air carrier with respect to shipments accepted for forwarding.
exv10w1







EXHIBIT 10.1




TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES, INC.

Board of Directors Compensation




     The Board of Directors of Total System Services, Inc. approved modifications to the
compensation to be paid to non-employee directors effective in July of 2009, as set forth below,
which modifications were limited to decreasing the company’s contribution to the director stock
purchase plan and beginning to pay a retainer to the Chairman of the Executive Committee:



Cash Compensation




	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Board Retainer
	 	$	40,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Committee Member Retainers
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	15,000	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	10,000	 
	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	 	$	7,500	 
	Executive Committee
	 	$	10,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Committee Chair Retainers*
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	15,000	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	10,000	 
	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	 	$	7,500	 
	Executive Committee
	 	$	15,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Lead Director Retainer
	 	$	5,000	 








 




			
	*	 	Note: The committee chair will receive both an annual committee member retainer and an annual
committee chair retainer.





Equity Compensation




	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual restricted stock award (in the form of a grant from the
TSYS 2008 Omnibus Plan, 3 year cliff vesting)
	 	500 shares
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Director Stock Purchase Plan
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual maximum company cash contribution per director
participant to company-sponsored open market stock purchase plan,
with company’s contribution equal to 15% of director participant’s
cash contribution, subject to annual maximum contribution limit by
director of $20,000. Employee directors may participate in this plan.
	 	$	10,000
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 457 

To require that $1 coins issued during 2019 honor President George H.W. 

Bush and to direct the Secretary of the Treasury to issue bullion coins 

during 2019 in honor of Barbara Bush. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2019 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. KING, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To require that $1 coins issued during 2019 honor President 

George H.W. Bush and to direct the Secretary of the 

Treasury to issue bullion coins during 2019 in honor 

of Barbara Bush. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘President George H.W. 

5 Bush and Barbara Bush Coin Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 457 IS

1 SEC. 2. COINS HONORING PRESIDENT GEORGE H.W. BUSH 

2 AND BARBARA BUSH. 

3 (a) CIRCULATING $1 COINS HONORING PRESIDENT

4 GEORGE H.W. BUSH.—Notwithstanding subsections (d), 

5 (n)(2)(E), (n)(3), (n)(4), and (n)(8) of section 5112 of 

6 title 31, United States Code, in addition to the coins to 

7 be issued under subsection (r) of such section 5112, and 

8 in accordance with the other provisions of subsection (n) 

9 of such section 5112, $1 coins issued during the 1-year 

10 period beginning on January 1, 2019, shall bear the image 

11 of President George H.W. Bush. 

12 (b) BULLION COINS HONORING BARBARA BUSH.— 

13 Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (5)(C) of section 

14 5112(o) of title 31, United States Code, and in accordance 

15 with the other provisions of such section 5112(o), the Sec16 retary of the Treasury shall, during the 1-year period be17 ginning on January 1, 2019, issue bullion coins that bear 

18 the image of Barbara Bush. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 399
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 399 appear at 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 399.63 Role of staff in route proceedings. ( a ) *General.* This policy statement establishes the standards applicable to staff participation in oral hearing cases involving award of route authority.
( b ) *Standards.* The staff's role during such hearings, primarily because it acts in the broad public interest, and not for a particular private or local interest, is to assure that essential evidence is introduced to resolve the public interest issues; that the evidence submitted by the parties is subject to adversary testing, and that decisional options are developed with the public interest in mind. In route cases designated by the Department that offer the opportunity for developing new policies to adapt to the administration of the Federal Aviation Act or that raise unusual evidentiary issues, a prehearing presentation by staff of decisional options will contribute to a better trial record, be consistent with traditional notions of fundamental fairness, better serve the Department's decisionmaking needs and ultimately serve the public interest. In any route case where the Department has not required the staff to participate by making a prehearing presentation, the staff shall present a prehearing presentation of decisional options if the administrative law judge finds that there exists unusual policy or evidentiary issues which clearly require such a presentation. We believe it is not desirable for the staff to advocate the adoption of a single decisional option at the outset of a case. Accordingly, ( 1 ) In route cases designated by the Department that offer the opportunity for developing new policies, the staff shall make a prehearing presentation of the decisional options available, and describe the kinds of evidence needed or available to develop each option. The staff need not and should not be required to develop evidence on each option. In every case, after the close of the hearing, however, the staff shall advocate a position based upon one or more of the decisional options identified in its prehearing presentation or developed at trial.
( 2 ) In any route case in which the administrative law judge finds that there exists unusual policy or evidentiary issues clearly requiring a prehearing presentation, the staff shall submit a prehearing statement of the decisional options available.
( 3 ) To the extent possible, the Department, in its instituting orders, will identify or designate the cases which involve the development of new policies or unusual evidentiary issues that will require the type of staff participation described in § 399.63(b)(1).
[PS-76, 43 FR 19354, May 5, 1978]
### Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000182 12-SEP-2014 11:47 AM

SCWC-13-0000182 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

KILAKILA 

### ' O HALEAKAL Â , Petitioner/Plaintiff/Appellant-Appellant,



### vs.
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI ' I and THOMAS M. APPLE, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the University of Hawai ' i at M â noa; BOARD OF LAND AND

NATURAL RESOURCES, WILLIAM AILA, in his official capacity as the Interim Chairperson of the Board of Land and Natural Resources; and DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, Respondents/Defendants/Appellees-Appellees.



### CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000182; CIVIL NO. 10-1-2510) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) 

### Petitioner/Plaintiff/Appellant-Appellant Kilakila ' O Haleakal â ’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 1, 2014, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral

### argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, September 12, 2014. David Kimo Frankel and Sharla Ann Manley for petitioner David M. Louie, William J. Wynhoff and Julie H. China for respondents Board of Land and Natural Resources, Department of Land and Natural Resources, and William J. Aila, Jr., in his official capacity as Chairperson of the Board of Land and Natural Resources Darolyn H. Lendio, Bryce Y. Matsui, Lisa Woods Munger, Lisa A. Bail and Christine A. Terada for respondents University of Hawai ' i and Thomas M. Apple, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the University of Hawai ' i at M â noa 

### /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
EXHIBIT 31.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Robert Ellin, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Amalgamated Technologies, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:


a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to me,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and


c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):


a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and


b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: May 19, 2005


/s/ Robert Ellin
------------------------
Robert Ellin
Chief Executive Officer
#### HARVEY ALUMINUM, a corporation, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S AND WAREHOUSEMEN’S UNION, LOCAL 8; and International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union, Appellees.

No. 16542.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

May 11, 1960.

Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra, Sam Speerstra, Salem, Or., for appellant.

Gladstein, Andersen, Leonard & Sibbett, San Francisco, Cal., Pozzi & Wilson, Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before POPE and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and BOWEN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant as plaintiff below brought this action against the appellees alleging in its complaint that this action “arises under the laws of the United States regulating commerce, and more particularly under § 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947 [29 U.S.C.A. § 187].” It was based upon a claim that defendants had been guilty of certain acts amounting to secondary boycott resulting in damage to plaintiff. Plaintiff demanded judgment for three million dollars, general damages, three million dollars, punitive damages, and thirty-five thousand dollars, attorneys’ fees. Defendants moved to strike from the complaint the allegations and the portion of the prayer claiming punitive damages. The motion was granted and plaintiff now attempts to appeal from the order granting that motion.

We think that the order from which appeal is sought is not a final order or decision within the meaning of § 1291 of Title 28 U.S.C. Appellant seems to think that its appeal may be maintained under the authority of Cohen v. Benefi*64cial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528. That case is not apposite here as the order in question was but a step in the process of bringing the case to final judgment. It represents a stage of the proceeding which may be effectively reviewed and corrected if and when final judgment results. The order is purely interlocutory and not appealable. Leonard v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 7 Cir., 130 F.2d 535, 537; United States v. Burnett; 9 Cir., 262 F.2d 55; Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company, 2 Cir., 103 F.2d 771.

The appeal is dismissed.
Process flow diagram for the use of the new chemical at sites controlled by others