alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-161-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

January 12, 2000.
    Take notice that on January 7, 2000, Colorado Interstate Gas 
Company (CIG), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, Sixth Revised Sheet No. 176, to be 
effective February 7, 2000.
    CIG states that it provides swing service pursuant to Rate Schedule 
SS-1. In implementing this Rate Schedule, CIG has discovered an 
oversight. CIG states that as currently structured, the commodity rate 
for the swing service applies only to daily gas quantities allocated to 
a shipper's swing contract that exceed 5% of the daily total scheduled 
quantities at the pertinent delivery point. To provide more flexibility 
to shippers, CIG asks the Commission for permission to expand the safe 
harbor so that the commodity rate applies only to daily swing 
quantities that exceed the greater of 100 Dth or 5% of the daily total 
scheduled quantities at the pertinent delivery point.
    CIG states that this revision will ensure that the swing service 
commodity rate is not imposed on small gas quantities. CIG states that 
to ensure that shippers get the immediate benefit of this expanded 
flexibility, it has posted a notice on its electronic bulletin board on 
November 5, 1999 that waives the pertinent provision of Rate Schedule 
SS-1 to implement the broader ``greater of'' standard.
    CIG further states that copies of this compliance filing have been 
served on CIG's jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1187 Filed 1-18-00;8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 6190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02261]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, February 28, 2014.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Enforcement Matters, and 
Examinations. In the event that the times, dates, or locations of this 
or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along 
with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

 Natise Allen,
 Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2014-02261 Filed 1-30-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 380
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 380.25 Prospectus filing and related requirements. A charter operator may organize and operate a Public Charter only in accordance with this part, and subject to the following conditions: ( a ) No charter operator shall operate, sell, receive money from any prospective participant for, or offer to sell or otherwise advertise a charter or series of charters until the Office of International Aviation, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing/Special Authorities Division , has accepted a Public Charter prospectus as described in § 380.28.
( b ) If within 10 days after the filing the Department notifies the charter operator that it has rejected the prospectus for noncompliance with this part, the prohibitions set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall continue until the Department advises that it has accepted the prospectus.
( c ) The following amendments to a filed prospectus may be made: ( 1 ) The addition or cancellation of any flight;
( 2 ) A change in any flight, date, origin city or destination city; and
( 3 ) A change in or addition of any direct air carrier, securer, or depository bank.
( d ) The charter operator shall amend the prospectus to reflect any change described in paragraph (c) of this section. The amendment shall be filed in the manner and form used for the original prospectus. It shall become effective upon filing unless the operator is otherwise notified.
( e ) The charter operator shall notify the depository bank (if any) and the securer of any change described in paragraph (c) of this section not later than when filing a prospectus amendment to reflect the change. If the securer is unable to adjust the security agreement as required by the change, the Office of International Aviation, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing/Special Authorities Division shall be advised of this fact within 2 business days.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 2106-0005)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, Telephone (703) 518-6304.

Becky Baker,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 00-11245  Filed 5-2-00; 11:11 am]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Skyles, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 286]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered September 12, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that there is legally insufficient evi*322dence to support his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree because the prosecution failed to establish that he constructively possessed a gun found on top of a dresser in his bedroom. We disagree.

To sustain a conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree the People must establish that the defendant had physical or constructive possession of the weapon recovered *(see,*Penal Law §§ 265.02, 265.15 [1]; § 10.00 [8]). Constructive possession may be established by direct evidence or by circumstantial evidence with inferences drawn from the facts presented in the case *(see, People v Brian,*84 NY2d 887). To prove constructive possession, the People must show that the defendant had dominion or control over the weapon *(see, People v Rodwell,*246 AD2d 916; *People v Brown,*181 AD2d 1041; *People v Vastola,*70 AD2d 918). A sufficient level of control over the area in which the contraband is found establishes constructive possession *(see, People v Manini,*79 NY2d 561). Mere access by others to the area does not preclude a finding of constructive possession *(see, People v Pinchback,*187 AD2d 540, *affd*82 NY2d 857; *People v Torres,*68 NY2d 677).

In the present case, the gun was discovered in the bedroom of the apartment in which the defendant resided. The defendant’s belongings were in his bedroom, and the dresser where the weapon was found belonged to the defendant. The defendant’s parents, who also resided in the apartment, had their own bedroom.

Based on the foregoing, we find that the defendant had a sufficient level of control over the area where the weapon was found to establish that he exercised dominion and control over the weapon and to uphold the conviction *(see, People v Phiefer,*43 NY2d 719; *People v Pinchback,*supra; *cf., People v Olivo,*120 AD2d 466; *People v Vastola, supra).*Joy, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
#### § 13.73 Notice of proposed order of compliance.

The Chief Counsel, a Deputy Chief Counsel, or the Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement may issue to an alleged violator a notice of proposed order of compliance advising the alleged violator of the charges and setting forth the remedial action sought in the form of a proposed order of compliance.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 63968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25269]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, November 15, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Enforcement Matters, and 
Examinations. In the event that the times, dates or locations of this 
or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along 
with the new time, date and location of the meeting will be posted on 
the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

Natise Stowe,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-25269 Filed 10-23-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
Termination of Loan Servicing Agreement



EXHIBIT 10.4 
 
TERMINATION OF LOAN SERVICING AGREEMENT 
 
THIS TERMINATION OF LOAN SERVICING AGREEMENT (this
“Agreement”) is dated as of the 1st day of April, 2003, by and between ONE CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, a
Georgia limited liability company (the “Manager”), and NATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company (the “Servicer”). 
 
WITNESSETH: 
 
WHEREAS,the Manager and the Servicer have entered into that certain Loan Servicing Agreement dated July 1, 2000, as amended by that
certain Extension of Loan Servicing Agreement dated July 1, 2001, whereby the Servicer performed certain services for the Manager in connection with the administration and servicing of certain mortgage loans to churches and nonprofit organizations
and ministries (collectively, the “Loan Servicing Agreement”). 
 
WHEREAS, the Manager and the Servicer desire to terminate the Loan Servicing Agreement as of the date hereof and waive the one hundred twenty (120) day prior written notice requirement in Section 6.02 of the Loan Servicing
Agreement. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in
consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Manager and the Servicer agree as follows: 
 
SECTION 1. Termination of Loan Servicing Agreement. The
Loan Servicing Agreement is hereby terminated in its entirety as of April 1, 2003 and shall have no further force and effect. The Manager and the Servicer hereby waive the one hundred twenty (120) day prior written notice requirement in Section 6.02
of the Loan Servicing Agreement. 
 
SECTION 2.
Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which, taken together, shall constitute one and the same agreement. 
 
SECTION 3. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be
deemed to be made pursuant to the laws of the State of Georgia with respect to agreements made and to be performed wholly in such state and shall be construed, interpreted, performed and enforced in accordance therewith. 
 









 
IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Manager and the Servicer have affixed their hands and seals as set forth below, as of the day and year first above written. 
 

	 MANAGER:
  
 ONE CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
  

	
	 By:
	 	 /s/    A. J. BRASWELL
                          (SEAL)


	 	 	 Name:     A. J. Braswell
 Title:     Chief Financial Officer



 
 
 

	 SERVICER:
  
 NATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company
  

By:   Assemblies of God Financial Services Group, a
      Missouri
nonprofit corporation
  

	
	 By:
	 	 /s/    RANDALL K. BARTON
                  (SEAL)


	 	 	 Name:     Randall K. Barton
 Title:     President and Chief Executive Officer



 

2
Exhibit 24.2


                               KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



     WHEREAS,  KeySpan  Corporation,  a New York  corporation  (the  "Company"),
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K as prescribed by
said Commission  pursuant to said Act and the rules and regulations  promulgated
thereunder.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in my capacity as a director of the Company,  I do hereby
appoint GERALD LUTERMAN, JOHN J. BISHAR, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and each of
them  severally,  as my  attorneys-in-fact  with power to execute in my name and
place, and in my capacity as a director of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any
amendment  to said  Report  and  any  other  documents  required  in  connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney this 24th day of
February, 2005.



                                                     /s/Robert J. Fani
#### § 400.2 Scope.

The regulations in this chapter set forth the procedures and requirements applicable to the authorization and supervision under 51 U.S.C. subtitle V, chapter 509, of commercial space transportation activities conducted in the United States or by a U.S. citizen. The regulations in this chapter do not apply to—

(a) Space activities carried out by the United States Government on behalf of the United States Government;

(b) The launch of an amateur rocket as defined in [§ 1.1](/on/2024-09-19/title-14/section-1.1) of [chapter I of this title](/on/2024-09-19/title-14/chapter-I); or

(c) A launch of a tethered launch vehicle that meets all the following criteria:

(1) *Launch vehicle.* The launch vehicle must—

(i) Be unmanned;

(ii) Be powered by a liquid or hybrid rocket motor;

(iii) Not use any of the toxic propellants of Table I417-2 and Table I417-3 in Appendix I of [part 417 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-14/part-417); and

(iv) Carry no more than 5,000 pounds of propellant.

(2) *Tether system.* The tether system must—

(i) Not yield or fail under—

(A) The maximum dynamic load on the system; or

(B) A load equivalent to two times the maximum potential engine thrust.

(ii) Have a minimum safety factor of 3.0 for yield stress and 5.0 for ultimate stress.

(iii) Constrain the launch vehicle within 75 feet above ground level as measured from the ground to the attachment point of the vehicle to the tether.

(iv) Display no damage prior to the launch.

(v) Be insulated or located such that it will not experience thermal damage due to the launch vehicle's exhaust.

(3) *Separation distances.* The launch operator must separate its launch from the public and the property of the public by a distance no less than that provided for each quantity of propellant listed in Table A of this section.

Table A—Separation Distances for Tethered Launches

| Propellant carried (lbs.) | Distance (ft.) of the public and property of the public from the launch point |
| --- | --- |
| 1-500 | 900 |
| 501-1,000 | 1,200 |
| 1001-1,500 | 1,350 |
| 1,501-2,000 | 1,450 |
| 2,001-2,500 | 1,550 |
| 2,501-3,000 | 1,600 |
| 3,001-3,500 | 1,650 |
| 3,501-4,000 | 1,700 |
| 4,001-4,500 | 1,750 |
| 4,501-5,000 | 1,800 |

[Doc. No. FAA-2012-0045, [80 FR 31834](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/80-FR-31834), June 4, 2015]
#### Marion O’Brien, Respondent, *v.*Denis Donegan, Appellant.

(Argued October 2, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*560
      *William B. Butler*and *Walter R. Hart*for appellant.

*William F. Mc Nulty*and *Harold R. Medina*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs. Questions certified are not relevant to the motion made at Special Term. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
#### STRAWN et al. v. HOLLIMAN, County Treas.

No. 29578.

Jan. 16, 1940.

*101 P. 2d 823.*

Williams & Williams, of Ardmore, for plaintiffs in error.

Alvin C. Bruce and R. H. Brett, both of Ardmore, for defendant in error.

HURST, J.

Plaintiffs’ property was sold to the county at the 1939 resale for $1,888.38. It was subsequently sold at commissioner’s sale for $450. Plaintiffs *143sought by mandamus to compel the county treasurer to issue a certificate of redemption upon the payment of $450 together with interest, penalty, and costs. The trial court denied the writ on two grounds: (1) That under section 14, art. 31, ch. 66, S. L. 1939, plaintiffs must pay the amount for which the land was sold to the county at resale plus the required interest, costs, and penalty; and (2) that section 11 of the act does not authorize a commissioner’s sale prior to the end of the redemption period on December 1, 1939.

1. Our decision in Roberts, County Treas., v. Rose Newell, 187 Okla. 139, 101 P. 2d 824, is decisive of the first question, and for the reasons therein stated the trial court erred in this respect.

2. Section 11 of the act expressly authorizes a commissioner’s sale, but makes no reference to when it may be held. The second paragraph of section 14 provides for the disposal of money paid by the redemptioner in the case of a commissioner’s sale. Because of this provision, we think it clear that the Legislature contemplated such a sale prior to the end of the redemption period. We find nothing in the act showing a contrary intention.

The judgment is-reversed, with direc-. tions to grant the writ.

BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, CORN, GIBSON, DAVISON, and DANNER, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7621

ERVIN SHERROD POLLARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

BUTCH JACKSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:08-hc-02121-BO)

Submitted: June 15, 2010 Decided: September 8, 2010

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ervin Sherrod Pollard, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, 

III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ervin Sherrod Pollard seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Pollard has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

“Elevation, in feet

180 4
160
1405
1205
100+
Northwest
I
NWYSEY
Sec. 22, T. 245.,R. 21

80

PLEISTOCENE.

Terrace sands

PLIOCENE
Bone Valley formation
PLIOCENE(?)
Alachua (?) formation

605 Phosphate,

hard-rock type

OLIGOCENE F =
Suwannee limestone

40

10

SWANEY
Sec. 11,T. 25 S., R. 21 E.

© 900 1800 cpm

Abundant angular fragments of
white phosphate, hord-rocktype.
Similar fragments are present
in this interval also in holes 8,
S,and 11

9

NWYSE%
See: 13, T. 25S., R. 21 E.

©9007 1800 cpm

8
SWUNE
Sec. 19, T. 25S., R. 22 E.

© 900 1800 cpm

S

WN

Lithologic symbols

o
a
S
a

Iron cementation or
staining; "hardpan’

2
s
2

Phosphote nodules

Section of core from which fossils

Chert fragments

Chert nodules

Colcareous clay

ees

Limestone

No recovery, core lost

A mixture of symbols indicates
a mixed lithology

6
NWANWY
Sec. 1, T. 265. R. 22 E.
0900 com
7 -

. SWUSW

\Sec. 27, T. 255., R 22 E.

©-900°¢pm

Alternating symbols indicate two or

Sample number and interval sampled

EXPLANATION
Other symbols Surtoce 2-200 ¢pm

Lithologic correlation

relation

Limits of aluminum and
calcium phosphate zones

‘three of the above correlations
follow the same line.

F

were identified

2 Trcce of gamma-ray log showing

intensity of radiation, cpm=
counts per minute
from lot 2547

4
NEVSWY4
Sec. 27, T. 265., R23.

5
SWYSW
Sec. 8, T. 265., R. 23 E. i
a 4
HES | af,

CROSS SECTION 17, LAND-PEBBLE PHOSPHATE DISTRICT, FLORIDA

Y
0S00 1800 cpm -~
a

3

NWUSW4
Sec. 1, T. 27'S., R. 23 E.

© 1@00 2700 3600 cpm

‘Scale, in feet
oO

2

NEYSWA
Sec. 18, T. 275., R. 24 E.

© 900 1800 2700 cpm

BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 32

Elevation, in feet

Southeast

|
NEYSEY
Sec. 11, T. 27S., R. 24 E.
© 900 1800 epm

PLEISTOCENE
Terrace sand

PLIOCENE
Bone Valley formation

MIDDLE MIOCENE
Hawthorn formation

LOWER MIOCENE
Tampa limestone

OLIGOCENE
Suwannee limestone

7-180.

+140

+120

t- 100

466352 © ~ 59 (In pocket)
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.204 Responsive documents. ( a ) Any person may file an answer in support of or in opposition to any application. Answers shall set forth the basis for the position taken, including any economic data or other facts relied on. Except as otherwise provided in § 302.212(d), answers shall be filed within twenty one (21) days of the original or amended application and shall be served in accordance with § 302.203.
( b ) Replies to answers shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after the filing of the answer.
( c ) Persons having common interests shall, to the extent practicable, arrange for the joint preparation of pleadings.