T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T he H onor abl e T hom a s S . Z i l l y , S e ni orU ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge ** * f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on, s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M AN UEL DE J ES US M ORALES LOPE Z a n dDO R A A L B E R T I NA DE L E ON M O RA LES, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74866 A ge nc yN os . A 073- 220- 464

A 077- 847- 251 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M a y17, 2013 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: M cK E O W N and W A T F O R D , C i rc ui tJudg es , and Z IL L Y , S eni or D i stri ct J udge . *** 

# FI LED MA Y22 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

M a nue l M or a l e s L ope z a nd D or aD e L e on M or a l e s appe a l f r om ade c i s i on by th e B o ar do f I m m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls (“B IA ”) u p h o ld in g th e I m m ig ra ti o n Ju d g e’s ( “ I J ” ) de ni a l of

the i rappl i c a t i on f

ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e . T he i rj oi ntappl i c a t i on r e s t s on an att ac k L op ez cl ai m s he s uffe re d i n G uat em al a. A ft eri dent i fy i ng m at er i al in c o n s is te n c ie s b e tw e e n d e s c r ip tio n s o f th e a tta c kL o p e z p r o v id e din h is appl i ca t i on , athi s a sy l um i nt ervi ew , and athi s m er i t s heari ng , the IJdet erm i ned th a t L o p e z w a s n o t c r e d ib le a n d d e n ie db o th p e titio n e r s r e lie f . T he IJ ’ s a dv er se cr edi bi l i ty det erm i nat i on w as supp ort ed by subst ant i al e vi de nc e tha tL ope z t e s t i f i e d i nc ons i s t e nt l yaboute ve nt s tha tf orm e d the ba s i s of th e p e titio n e r s ’ a s y lu m c la im . Zam an ov v. H older , 64 9 F . 3d 96 9, 97 3 (9th C i r. 2011) . T he I Jpr ovi de d L ope z the opportuni tyt o e xpl a i n hi s i nc ons i s t e nc i e s a nd a d d r e s s e dw h yh is e x p la n a tio n s w e r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . So to-O larte v . H older , 555 F . 3d 10 89 , 10 91 –9 2 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). L op ez ar gu es thatthe IJpl ac ed t oo m uch w ei gh ton the abse nce of corr ob orat i ng t es t i m on y f rom hi s brother, bu teven ac cordi ng thi s pot ent i al basi s f or an adverse cr edi bi l i ty f i nd i ng no w ei gh t , the other grou nd s f

or the IJ ’ s a dv er se cr edi bi l i ty dec i si on w er e s up po rt ed by subst ant i al e v id e n c e . See R i

zk v. H older , 6 2 9 F .3 d1 0 8 3 , 1 0 8 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) . T he pet i t i on er s a l so se ek re vi ew of the IJ ’ s dec i si on t o d eny vol un t ary3

departure. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the grantor deni al of vo l un t ary d e p a rtu r e . 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 c ( f ) ; Esqui ve l-G arci a v. H older , 593 F . 3d 1025, 1030 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). A l tho ug h w e m ayre vi ew qu es t i on s of l aw re l at ed t o v ol un t ary de pa rtur e , the I J ’ s de c i s i on w a s di s c r e t i ona rya s t o both pe t i t i one r s a nd pr e s e nt s no q u e s tio n s o f

la w . G i l v. H older , 65 1 F . 3d 10 00 , 10 03 (9th C i r. 20 11 ). PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED I N PA R T, D I SM I SSED I N PA R T.