alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4249 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4249

 To ensure the protection of human genetic information collected as a 
               result of diagnostic testing for COVID-19.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2020

  Mr. Tillis introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure the protection of human genetic information collected as a 
               result of diagnostic testing for COVID-19.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROTECTION OF HUMAN GENETIC INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services shall ensure that no person may 
collect, store, analyze, disseminate, or otherwise make use of, or 
benefit from, any human genetic information collected as a result of 
diagnostic testing for COVID-19, for any incidental use, or any reason 
other than such diagnostic or serologic testing, except with the 
express, written, informed consent of the individual being tested.
    (b) Enforcement.--Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be 
subject to a civil monetary penalty of not more than $100 for each such 
violation.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``genetic information'' has the meaning given 
        such term in section 160.103 of title 45, Code of Federal 
        Regulations (or any successor regulations); and
            (2) the term ``incidental'' means any action taken by any 
        person, directly or indirectly, to obtain genetic information 
        from an individual, for any purpose, other than the purpose 
        specifically authorized by the living individual from whom the 
        specimen has its biological origin or another designated 
        individual if the individual is a minor or is incapacitated, or 
        if the individual is deceased, the individual's next of kin.
                                 <all>
```
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No . FAA

- 20 14

- 0578 Directorate ID : 20 13

- SW

- 048

- AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Deutschland Helicopters Model MBB

- BK 117C

- 2 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): Airbus Deutschlan d Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason : The proposed actions are intended to prevent the loss of an attachment screw, which
could result in movement of the output lever in an axial direction, contact of a bolt connecting the control rod to an output lev er with the actuator housing, and subsequent loss of helicopter
control.

Costs : Applying torque and torque marking to the lateral and longitudinal trim actuator output levers requires 1 work

- hour for a labor cost of $85. No parts are needed, so the cost for the U.S. fleet totals $8,500. Visually inspecting for correct torque requires 0.5 work

- hour for a labor cost of about $43. No parts are needed, so the total cost for the U.S. fleet is $4,300 per inspection cycle.

Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD b e considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  )

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  )

Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  )

Project Engineer : Matt Wilbanks
#### §§ 417.130-417.200 [Reserved]
#### § 235.1 Definitions.

For the purposes of this part:

*Air transport* includes the entire period during which an animal is in the custody of an air carrier, from the time that the animal is tendered to the air carrier prior to departure until the air carrier tenders the animal to the owner, guardian or representative of the shipper of the animal at the animal's final destination. It does not include animals that accompany a passenger at his or her seat in the cabin and of which the air carrier does not take custody.

*Animal* means any warm- or cold-blooded animal which, at the time of transportation, is being kept as a pet in a family household in the United States and any dog or cat which, at the time of transportation, is shipped as part of a commercial shipment on a scheduled passenger flight, including shipments by trainers and breeders.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS VAN HOPKINS NO. 

### 2023 KW 1246



### FEBRUARY 27, 2024

In Re: Van Hopkins, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 

### 20th Judicial District Court, 

### Parish of West Feliciana, No. 

### 22-WFLN-237.

BEFORE: THERIOT, 

### PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The conduct alleged against the 

### defendant does not provide a legal 

### basis for the offense charged. See State v. DeJesus, 

### 94-0261 ( La. 

### 9/ 16/94), 

### 642 So.2d 854, 855 ( per curiam). See also 

### State v. Robinson, 

### 2020-01389 ( La. 

### 3/9/21), 312 

### So.3d 

### 255, 256 ( per curiam). 

## Accordingly, the 

### district court erred 

## by not. 

### ordering the 

### bill of 

### information quashed. The 

### ruling 

## denying the motion to quash 

### is reversed, the motion 

### is granted, and this matter 

### is remanded to the 

### district court 

### for furtherproceedings.

Penzato, J., 

### dissents 

## and would deny the writ. Here, the 

### defense argues the 

## failure to inform law enforcement of Marshall Rayburn's physical 

### location 

### does not rise to the 

### level of criminal conduct. 

### As a general rule, a motion to quash does not serve as a vehicle 

### for 

### asserting defenses to the merits of the charges against the 

### defendant. See State v. Faggin, 

### 2014-0326 La. 

### 10/24/ 

### 14), 150 

### So.3d 

### 298, 299 ( per curiam); State v. Thomas, 

### 2012-0470 ( La. 

### App. lst Cir. 

### 11/14/12), 111 

### So.3d 386, 

### 388-89 ( The question of the 

### factual guilt or 

### innocence of the 

### defendant is not 

## raised by the motion to quash). An exception 

## tothisgeneral ruleexists in caseswheretheStatehasalleged or admitted 

### facts under which a lawful conviction 

### for the charged offense 

### is not possible. State v. Clark, 

### 2012-1296 ( La. 

### 5/7/ 13), 

### 117 

### So.3d. 1246, 

### 1249 ( per curiam). The 

### indictment alleges criminal negligence and charges an offense which 

### is punishable under a valid statute. The 

### Defendant did not file a motion 

### for a bill of particulars and there 

### has been no stipulation of 

### facts 

## by the State. 

### Therefore, the 

### district court was not presented with 

### a purely legal question. I would find that the 

### district court 

### did not err 

## bydenying the motion to quash.



### OURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### PUTY CLERKOFCOURT FOR THE COURT
**Dikegulac Sodium Registration Review Focus Meeting Held.**

**Summary** On July 24, 2014 the OPP registration review team met with representatives from USDA, PBI/Gordon and ArborS ystems to discuss current use and usage, and sales data of dikegulac sodium

. Dikegulac sodium is a growth regulator registered to prevent flowering and undesired fruit sets, to retard growth, and to promote lateral branching. Currently, it is registered for use on hedges, shrubs, trees, and groundcovers in a number of residential, public, and industrial settings. The docket is scheduled to open in December 2014. **Participants BEAD:**  Carl Chen, Cynthia Doucoure , Arnet Jones **EFED** : Brian Anderson, Jean Holmes, Greg Orrick, Elyssa Arnold **HED** : Bridgett Bobowiec, Yvonne Barnes **PRD RMIB2**  : Matthew Manupella, Cathryn Britton **RD** : Heather Garvie **PBI/Gordon** : Jim Kunstman **Arborsystems** : Kim Davis **USDA**: Ted Rogers **Agenda Topics**  1. BEAD  Discussion of current usage information , for dikegulac sodium including: o pounds a.i . applied or sold annually o average a.i. application rate o average # of applications per year o breakdown of use by application method o describe the primary uses (e.g., In nurseries? Greenhouses? Ornamentals in yards? Any particular species?) o Is use expected near water? Could use be restricted near water bodies?

 What is the geographic distribution of dikegulac sodium use in the U.S.?  Given what appears to be relatively low usage, how important is this chemical to the nursery and floriculture sector in the U.S. ? 2. EFED  Are the registrants aware of any similar chemicals on the market? (e.g., chemicals that are expected to have similar toxicity profiles in particular)  Are the registrants aware of any fate or ecotox studies that have not been previously submitted to the Agency?  Has the registrant encountered any concerns from users about exposure of pollinators to dikegulac

- sodium?
---

Exhibit 32








Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Playboy Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Scott Flanders, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Linda G. Havard, as Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Scott Flanders


Name:
Scott Flanders


Title:
Chief Executive Officer


Date:
August 7, 2009








/s/ Linda Havard


Name:
Linda G. Havard


Title:
Chief Financial Officer


Date:
August 7, 2009








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to Playboy Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Playboy Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 25.631 Bird strike damage.

The empennage structure must be designed to assure capability of continued safe flight and landing of the airplane after impact with an 8-pound bird when the velocity of the airplane (relative to the bird along the airplane's flight path) is equal to *V**C* at sea level, selected under § 25.335(a). Compliance with this section by provision of redundant structure and protected location of control system elements or protective devices such as splitter plates or energy absorbing material is acceptable. Where compliance is shown by analysis, tests, or both, use of data on airplanes having similar structural design is acceptable.

[Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5674, Apr. 8, 1970]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10838]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Clarification--Fiscal Year (FY) 2000 Funding Opportunities Notice

AGENCY: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and 
Mental Health Services Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Clarification of a Notice of Funding Availability Regarding the 
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) 
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) PRC Implementation Program 
Funding Announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is to inform the public that a statement in the 
SAMHSA/CSAT Guidance for Applicants No. TI 00-004 entitled, Cooperative 
Agreement to Bridge the Gap: Phase II Implementation of Community-Based 
Practice/Research Collaboratives (Short Title: PRC Implementation 
Program) has been clarified. The Notice of Funding Availability for the 
PRC Implementation Program was published in the Federal Register on 
March 28, 2000 (65 FR 16401-16403).
    A sentence in the last paragraph of Section II--Program 
Description, subsection 3, Pilot and Knowledge Application Evaluation 
Studies, has been clarified by adding the words ``per year.'' The 
revised sentence reads: ``No single Knowledge Application Evaluation 
Study should exceed $75,000 in direct costs per year.'' The full 
Guidance for Applicants is available via the SAMHSA web site--
www.samhsa.gov, or from the National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug 
Information (Telephone: 800-729-6686).
    Questions concerning the clarification or other program issues may 
be directed to: Frances Cotter, Project Director, Office of Managed 
Care, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, SAMHSA, Rockwall II, Suite 
740, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: (301) 443-8796.

    Dated: April 24, 2000.
Richard Kopanda,
Executive Office, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-10838 Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,998
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,145
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,085
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     46,929
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,008
<LOANS>                                        119,221
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,142
<DEPOSITS>                                     139,382
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,129
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,953
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,788
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,110)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 185,142
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,389
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  737
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    99
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,225
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,547
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,665
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,560
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      204
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (36)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (1,518)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,518)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.41)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.59
<LOANS-NON>                                         72
<LOANS-PAST>                                       397
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   537
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,457
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       40
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,621
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,621
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
### Swanson, Brian {OST) Fr-Om:. 

## ·se'ntr · To: Cc: Subject: John Burczyk <jburczyk@yahoo.com> Sunday, August 12,2012 2:37 PM Devany, Dennis (OST) Swanson, Brian (OST) Rhinelander Aitport Contract 

# ..,- , ,.**-~Jrtu=t·** 

## 2.ou..

# P'pq

. I"**II'~**

Hello;Back when Northwest Airlines had the contract and with 2 sons in the military our family was a frequent user of the Rhinelander Airport.Lately,we been forced to drive to Milwaukee for our airline trips 

### .I think the Delta/Skywest option would best serve the airport at this time.Thankyou,John Burczyk 5611 Rush Rd.Conover,Wi.54519.

1
#### § 29.631 Bird strike.

The rotorcraft must be designed to ensure capability of continued safe flight and landing (for Category A) or safe landing (for Category B) after impact with a 2.2-lb (1.0 kg) bird when the velocity of the rotorcraft (relative to the bird along the flight path of the rotorcraft) is equal to VNE or VH (whichever is the lesser) at altitudes up to 8,000 feet. Compliance must be shown by tests or by analysis based on tests carried out on sufficiently representative structures of similar design.

[Doc. No. 28008, 61 FR 21907, May 10, 1996; 61 FR 33963, July 1, 1996]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Paul Pyshnack, Respondent, against Henry Forge & Tool, Inc., et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

(Argued September 30, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*547
      *Robert E. Dineen*for appellants.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Leon Freedman*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Larry L. Richards, Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                                                                                            
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Larry L.
Richards                                                                      
| |  | Larry L. Richards
Controller
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
November 14, 2002

24
#### § 414.9 Pre-application consultation.

The applicant must consult with the FAA before submitting an application. Unless the applicant or the FAA requests another form of consultation, consultation is oral discussion with the FAA about the application process and the potential issues relevant to the FAA's safety element approval decision.
#### § 262.3 Applicability.

This part applies to all covered carriers that are the merchant of record for a covered flight or the operating carrier of a covered flight when a ticket agent is the merchant of record.
§ 29.1301 Function and installation. Each item of installed equipment must— ( a ) Be of a kind and design appropriate to its intended function;
( b ) Be labeled as to its identification, function, or operating limitations, or any applicable combination of these factors;
( c ) Be installed according to limitations specified for that equipment; and
( d ) Function properly when installed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Allstates  WorldCargo,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March  31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Craig D. Stratton, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
      Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
      operations of the Company for the periods presented.


Dated: May 16, 2005


/s/ Craig D. Stratton
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
CERAM Environmental} Inc. Responseto EPA}s Section 114 Request August 23} 2010 (CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Irving Smith against Kosters Bakery, Inc., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Appellant.

(Argued September 30, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Hector A. Robichon*of counsel), for appellant.

*Jeremiah F. Connor*for respondents.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
§ 374a.5 Exemption authority. Air carriers are exempt from the following provisions of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII: ( a ) Section 41510.
( b ) Section 41310, and any and all other provisions of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, to the extent necessary to enable air carriers to comply with the provisions of this part.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15939, Apr. 16, 2019]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the period ended September 30, 2003, I, Gary D.Gall, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)                                  suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company forthe period ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western SierraBancorp.

 

 
| Dated:  November 10, 2003 |                                  |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                |                                  |
|                                |                                  |
|                                | /s/ Gary D. Gall                      |   |
|                                | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----