alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 72nd District Court of Lubbock County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on February 12,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

In the Interest of M.H. and Z.H., Children v.

Case Number: 07-15-00046-CV Trial Court Number: 2012-502,824

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated February 12, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the 72nd

District Court of Lubbock County, Texas for further proceedings in accordance with this

Court’s opinion entered this day.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on February 12, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
#### § 415.21 General.

The FAA issues a policy approval to a license applicant unless the FAA determines that a proposed launch would jeopardize U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, or international obligations of the United States. A policy approval is part of the licensing record on which the FAA's licensing determination is based.
632 A.2d 445

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. John Wesley DAYS.

Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 28,

September Term, 1993.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Nov. 2, 1993.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Consent to Disbarment from the practice of law filed by John Wesley Days, in accordance with Maryland Rule BV12d2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 2nd day of November, 1993

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that John Wesley Days be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of John Wesley Days, from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule BV13, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  6.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ProLink Holdings Corp.7.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;8.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;9.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (f)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to we, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(g)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(h)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 10.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on out most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 (i)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of the internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(j)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or the other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael S. BrowneMichael S. BrowneChief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
#### Warner *vs.*Lincoln.

On a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, where the plaintiff stipulates to try at the next circuit and to pay costs, he cannot require a regular notice of taxation; but must attend the taxation on reasonable notice.
#### § 33.34 Turbocharger rotors.

Each turbocharger case must be designed and constructed to be able to contain fragments of a compressor or turbine that fails at the highest speed that is obtainable with normal speed control devices inoperative.

[Amdt. 33-22, 72 FR 50860, Sept. 4, 2007]
exv10w30






Exhibit 10.30




2009 Special Bonus Payments to Executive Officers




     As previously disclosed, in May and August 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the payment of 2009 special
bonuses to each of the Company’s current executive officers. For additional information regarding
these special bonus payments, please refer to pages 24-26 of the Company’s definitive proxy
statement for its 2009 annual meeting of stockholders filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 19, 2009.
§ 297.12 General requirements. ( a ) The direct air transportation provided must be performed by direct air carriers that hold authority under section 41102, 41103, 41302, or 41701 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII or are operating under part 298 of this chapter;
( b ) Only U.S. citizen direct air carriers may provide direct air transportation operations in interstate air transportation.
( c ) Foreign indirect air carriers that hold authority to engage in foreign air transportation must apply additionally for permission to consolidate freight in interstate air transportation.
[ER-1294, 47 FR 19684, May 7, 1982, as amended at 60 FR 43527, Aug. 22, 1995; DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15934, Apr. 16, 2019]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4129 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate advance refunding 

bonds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 1, 2020 

Mr. WICKER (for himself, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. BENNET, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. 

BARRASSO, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. CARPER) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate 

advance refunding bonds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lifting Our Commu5 nities through Advance Liquidity for Infrastructure Act’’ 

6 or the ‘‘LOCAL Infrastructure Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF ADVANCE REFUNDING BONDS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by section 

9 13532 of Public Law 115–97 are repealed and the proviVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:54 Jul 12, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4129.IS S4129

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4129 IS

1 sions of law amended by such section are restored as if 

2 such section had never been enacted. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by this sec4 tion shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certification**

 

Each undersigned officer of Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation (the“Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Exchange Act.  In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification shall not be deemed (i) “filed” for purposes of Section 18of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of thatsection or (ii) to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

 
| Date: November 13, 2003 | By:                                      | /s/ Richard Wayne  |   |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                         | Richard Wayne                            |
|                         | President (Principal  Executive Officer) |
|                         |                                     |
| Date: November 13, 2003 | By:                                      | /s/ Edward F. Mehm |   |
|                         | Edward F. Mehm                           |
|                         | Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)  |
|                              |                                          |                    |        |  |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40906

Summary Calendar

PAUL ALLEN BROWN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STACY KIMBERLIN; ANTHONY FREEMAN; DENNIS HENDRICKS; FRANK

CRIPPEN; GEORGE FONG; RICHARD SEWARD,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:06-CV-96

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Paul Allen Brown, Texas prisoner # 1135724, appeals from the

district court’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel. 

Brown has failed to brief the issue of his entitlement to counsel

and has therefore waived the only issue before this court. See

Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744,

748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-11521-99) and Form S-8 (No. 333-110086 and
333-134953) of CH Energy Group, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 2007
relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Buffalo, New York
February 12, 2007
§ 382.155 How must carriers respond to written complaints? ( a ) As a carrier providing service using aircraft with 19 or more passenger seats, you must respond to written complaints received by any means (*e.g.,* letter, fax, e-mail, electronic instant message) concerning matters covered buy this part.
( b ) As a passenger making a written complaint, you must state whether you had contacted a CRO in the matter, provide the name of the CRO and the date of the contact, if available, and enclose any written response you received from the CRO.
( c ) As a carrier, you are not required to respond to a complaint postmarked or transmitted more than 45 days after the date of the incident, except for complaints referred to you by the Department of Transportation.
( d ) As a carrier, you must make a dispositive written response to a written disability complaint within 30 days of its receipt. The response must specifically admit or deny that a violation of this part has occurred. ( 1 ) If you admit that a violation has occurred, you must provide to the complainant a written statement setting forth a summary of the facts and the steps, if any, you will take in response to the violation.
( 2 ) If you deny that a violation has occurred, your response must include a summary of the facts and your reasons, under this part, for the determination.
( 3 ) Your response must also inform the complainant of his or her right to pursue DOT enforcement action under this part.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2004-19482, 73 FR 27665, May 13, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 44887, July 30, 2010]
SPECIES

DATA_POINTS

AVG_OBS (ug/m3)

AVG_MOD (ug/m3)

MEAN_BIAS (ug/m3)

MEAN_ERROR (ug/m3)

NMB

NME

MFB

MFE

CORR

PMTOT 26 28.06 23.44 -4.62 10.95 -0.16 0.39 -0.01 0.36 0.54

PMNH4 26 3.93 2.53 -1.41 2.03 -0.36 0.52 -0.23 0.47 0.46

PMNO3 26 11.52 7.38 -4.14 5.79 -0.36 0.50 -0.32 0.49 0.48

PMSO4 26 1.20 1.00 -0.20 0.48 -0.17 0.40 -0.09 0.41 0.35

PMOTHR 26 1.00 3.45 2.46 2.46 2.46 2.46 1.15 1.15 0.45

PMEC 26 1.27 2.51 1.24 1.24 0.97 0.97 0.72 0.72 0.74

PMOC 26 7.52 4.66 -2.86 3.04 -0.38 0.40 -0.42 0.45 0.57 SPECIES DATA_POINTS AVG_OBS (ug/m3) AVG_MOD (ug/m3) MEAN_BIAS (ug/m3) MEAN_ERROR (ug/m3) NMB NME MFB MFE CORR

PMTOT 27 30.49 24.97 -5.52 10.15 -0.18 0.33 0.01 0.38 0.86

PMNH4 27 3.46 2.81 -0.65 1.30 -0.19 0.38 0.05 0.43 0.79

PMNO3 27 10.00 8.40 -1.60 3.70 -0.16 0.37 0.03 0.40 0.78

PMSO4 27 1.08 0.96 -0.12 0.35 -0.11 0.33 -0.10 0.33 0.46

PMOTHR 27 0.62 3.88 3.27 3.27 5.32 5.32 1.45 1.45 0.43

PMEC 27 1.34 2.24 0.90 0.94 0.67 0.70 0.55 0.56 0.78

PMOC 27 9.97 4.72 -5.25 5.25 -0.53 0.53 -0.57 0.57 0.79 SPECIES DATA_POINTS AVG_OBS (ug/m3) AVG_MOD (ug/m3) MEAN_BIAS (ug/m3) MEAN_ERROR (ug/m3) NMB NME MFB MFE CORR

PMTOT 15 25.13 20.71 -4.43 9.80 -0.18 0.39 -0.01 0.44 0.71

PMNH4 15 3.16 2.32 -0.84 1.83 -0.27 0.58 -0.09 0.74 0.59

PMNO3 15 9.12 5.91 -3.21 4.59 -0.35 0.50 -0.28 0.71 0.76

PMSO4 15 1.10 1.59 0.48 0.98 0.44 0.89 0.24 0.58 -0.03

PMOTHR 15 0.68 3.67 2.99 2.99 4.43 4.43 1.38 1.38 0.59

PMEC 3 0.73 3.08 2.34 2.34 3.19 3.19 1.19 1.19 0.04

PMOC 3 13.23 6.73 -6.51 6.51 -0.49 0.49 -0.65 0.65 0.53 SPECIES DATA_POINTS AVG_OBS (ug/m3) AVG_MOD (ug/m3) MEAN_BIAS (ug/m3) MEAN_ERROR (ug/m3) NMB NME MFB MFE CORR

PMTOT 15 30.60 20.66 -9.94 11.26 -0.32 0.37 -0.25 0.32 0.74

PMNH4 15 3.41 3.02 -0.39 0.98 -0.11 0.29 0.00 0.26 0.82

PMNO3 15 12.06 9.37 -2.69 5.16 -0.22 0.43 -0.03 0.35 0.74

PMSO4 15 1.12 0.78 -0.33 0.40 -0.30 0.36 -0.29 0.35 0.52

PMOTHR 15 0.84 2.50 1.66 1.66 1.98 1.98 1.03 1.03 0.70

PMEC 3 0.73 1.67 0.94 0.94 1.28 1.28 0.83 0.83 0.78

PMOC 3 13.10 3.57 -9.53 9.53 -0.73 0.73 -1.12 1.12 -0.20

*: The correlation coefficient is "R" instead of "R2"

*: NMB: normalized mean bias; NME: normalized mean error; MFB: mean fractional bias; MFE: mean fractional error

Bakersfield - California Street

Fresno - First Street

Modesto - 14th Street

Visalia - North Church Street
TY  - RPRT
A3  - U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Geological Survey : For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off.,
CY  - 
C6  - 
ET  - -
LA  - ENGLISH
M3  - Report
SN  - 1052B
SP  - 
T2  - Bulletin
VL  - 
AU  - Lachenbruch, Arthur H.
TI  - Three-dimensional heat conduction in permafrost beneath heated buildings
PY  - 1957
DO  - 
DB  - USGS Publications Warehouse
UR  - http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/b1052B
ER  -
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 448 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 448

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit fellowship and 
 stipend compensation to be saved in an individual retirement account.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2019

  Ms. Warren (for herself, Mr. Lee, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Scott of South 
   Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit fellowship and 
 stipend compensation to be saved in an individual retirement account.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Graduate Student Savings Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN NON-TUITION FELLOWSHIP AND STIPEND PAYMENTS TREATED AS 
              COMPENSATION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 219(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``Such term includes any amount paid to an individual to aid the 
individual in the pursuit of graduate or postdoctoral study or 
research.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
#### SVINGA BROTHERS CORP. v METRO DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT

Case No. 90-220 AP

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County

April 17, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Eric D. Isicoff, Esquire, Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston, Dunwody & Cole, for appellant.

Janet Hall, Esquire, Metro Dade Police Department, for appellee.

Before TENDRICH, FERRO, GOLDMAN, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GOLDMAN, J.

This is an appeal from two final decisions of an Administrative Hearing Officer for the Code Enforcement Division of Dade County. The Appellant was found guilty of two violations of the false burglar alarm provisions of the Dade County Code. We reverse.

*72The County failed to produce any witness with first hand knowledge of the facts underlying the issuance of the citations and also failed to favor this Court with a brief.

The Hearing Officer found that the burglar alarm signals had been activated by attempted burglaries. His decision finding Appellant guilty was clearly erroneous and in direct contradiction to his factual findings..

Accordingly, the findings of guilty are hereby reversed.

TENDRICH, FERRO, JJ., concur.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

EXPLANATION

Position 1

x=0, y=0, z=20ft

Position 2

x=30ft, y=0, z=20ft

Position 2

[ft

BULLETIN 1052 PLATE 2

zone| 2igner | Souter |14(2)? PERCENT
A | 000 | .204 | 1010 | 2
B | 204 | .363 | 1080 | 4
c | 363 | 540 | 1204 | 6
p | 540 | 749 | 1415 | 8
E | .749 | 1.019 | 1.782 | 10
F | 1.019 | 1333 | 2383 | 10
@ | 1.333 | 1.731 | 3347 | 10
H | 1.731 | 2.290 | 5.042 | 10
| | 2290 | 3.179 | 8477 | 10
J | 3.179 | 4888 | 17.27 | 10
k | 4888 | 6658 | 3433 | 5
L | 6658 | 9.987 | 7026 | 5
TOTAL 90

Position 1

SOLID-ANGLE GRID, SHOWING CORRECT POSITIONING FOR CALCULATION OF THE
THERMAL EFFECT OF A 40- BY 100-FOOT REGION AT TWO POSITIONS

z
—l

Depth, z, =1 inch
§ 389.21 Payment of fees. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any document for which a filing fee is required by § 389.25 shall be paid for electronically at *http://www.pay.gov ,* a secure government-wide collection portal, unless a waiver or modification of the filing fee has been requested and approved. Payments can be made directly from a bank account or by credit/debit card.
( b ) Registration for all air taxi operators shall be accompanied by an 8 dollar ($8) registration filing fee in the form of a check, draft, or postal money order payable to the U.S. Department of Transportation.
( c ) Where a document seeks authority or relief in the alternative and therefore would otherwise be subject to more than one filing fee, only the highest fee shall be required.
( d ) Where a document relating to a single transaction or matter seeks multiple authorities or relief and therefore would otherwise be subject to more than one filing fee, only the highest fee shall be required. Where a document relating to more than one transaction or matter seeks multiple authorities or relief, the required filing fee shall be determined by combining the highest fees for each transaction or matter. For purposes of this paragraph (d), a specific number of charters or inclusive tours described in one application will be regarded as a single transaction or matter.
( e ) No fee shall be returned after the document has been filed with the Department, except as provided in §§ 389.23 and 389.27.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4487 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4487

  To extend limits on discretionary spending through fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 6, 2020

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend limits on discretionary spending through fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pandemic Pay-For Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.

    Section 251(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(c)(8)) is amended in the matter 
preceding subparagraph (A) by striking ``fiscal year 2021'' and 
inserting ``each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024''.
                                 <all>
```
#### COOK v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 18, 1916.)

Appeal from Autauga Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Leon McCord.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed on motion of Attorney General.