alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Abraham Goldstein, Respondent, *v.*Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, Appellant. Abraham Goldstein, Respondent, *v.*Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Appellant. Abraham Goldstein, Respondent, *v.*Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

Argued January 19, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*579
      *John Bright*and *Abram F. Servin*for appellants.

*William B. Crowell, Harry Cole Bates, Allan E. Brosmith*and *Louis H. Cooke*for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al., *amici curiæ.*

*Isadore Rothenberg*for respondent.

*580
      *Per Curiam.*

The evidence shows that the insured was permanently and totally disabled as defined in the policies. It is, therefore, unnecessary to determine whether the definition formulated by the courts below accurately explained the language of the policies.

The judgments should be affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.

Judgments affirmed.
§ 61.401 What is the purpose of this subpart? ( a ) This part prescribes the following requirements that apply to a flight instructor certificate with a sport pilot rating: ( 1 ) Eligibility.
( 2 ) Aeronautical knowledge.
( 3 ) Flight proficiency.
( 4 ) Endorsements.
( 5 ) Privileges and limits.
( b ) Other provisions of this part apply to the logging of flight time and testing.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-11133, 69 FR 44875, July 27, 2004, as amended by Amdt. 61-125, 75 FR 5222, Feb. 1, 2010]
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Fogarty International Center Advisory Board.

The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation of other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Fogarty International Center Advisory Board.                    

*Date:*                         February 8, 2000.                    

*Open:*                         8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         Report of the Director, technology transfer at NIH, and discussions of Fogarty International Center organization and planning.                    

*Place:*                         Lawton Chiles International House, 16 Center Drive (Building 16), Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Closed:*                         12 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                     

*Place:*                         Lawton Chiles International House, 16 Center Drive (Building 16), Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Irene W. Edwards, Information Officer, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Building 31, Room B2C08, 31 Center Drive MSC 2220, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-2075.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.106, Minority International Research Training Grant in the Biomedical and Behavioral Sciences; 93.154, Special International Postdoctoral Research Program in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 93.934, Fogarty International Research Collaboration Award; 93.989, Senior International Fellowship Awards Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: January 11, 2000.

 LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-1146 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11936]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-507-000]

Amoco Energy Trading Corporation, Amoco Production Company, and 
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company v. El Paso Natural Gas Company; 
Notice of Informal Settlement Conference

May 8, 2000.
    Pursuant to the Commission's order in Amoco Energy Trading 
Corporation et al v. El Paso Natural Gas Company, 89 FERC para. 61,165 
(1999), Commission Staff held a Technical Conference on March 9, 2000, 
to discuss El Paso's February 9, 2000 proposal to change its current 
allocation methods and all issues related to the allocation of receipt 
and delivery points on El Paso's system.
    At a subsequent technical conference, the participants reached 
consensus to attend an informal settlement conference. The participants 
also agreed that the Director of the Commission's Dispute Resolution 
Service (Director) attend the conference to facilitate the settlement 
negotiations. The parties also agreed that a party could provide to the 
Director, in advance of the informal settlement conference, a statement 
of the issues or business interests that they believed needed to be 
considered. Accordingly, the informal settlement conference will begin 
with a discussion regarding the settlement process, followed by a 
discussion of the statements provided to the Director.
    The informal settlement conference will be held on May 16, 2000, at 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission located at 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC. The conference will begin at 10 a.m. in Room 3M-
2A/2B.
    All interested parties in the above dockets are requested to attend 
the informal settlement conference. If a party has any questions with 
respect to the conference, please call Richard Miles, the Director of 
the Dispute Resolution Service. His telephone number is 1-877 FERC ADR 
(337-2237) or 202-208-0702 and his e-mail address is 
[email protected].

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11936 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4409 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4409

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ``Lawrence 
                  M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2020

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ``Lawrence 
                  M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAWRENCE M. ``LARRY'' WALSH SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lawrence M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lawrence 
M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 251.1 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Certificated air carrier* means a U.S. carrier holding a certificate issued under 49 U.S.C. 41102 to conduct passenger service or holding an exemption to conduct passenger operations under 49 U.S.C. 40109.

*Commuter air carrier* means a U.S. carrier that has been found fit under 49 U.S.C. 41738 and is authorized to carry passengers on at least five round trips per week on at least one route between two or more points according to a published flight schedule using small aircraft as defined in 14 CFR 298.2.

*Covered carrier* means a certificated carrier, a commuter carrier, an air taxi, or a U.S. indirect carrier operating to, from, or within the United States, conducting scheduled passenger service or public charter service.

*Indirect carrier* means a person not directly involved in the operation of an aircraft who sells air transportation services to the general public other than as an authorized agent of a carrier.

[80 FR 166, Jan. 5, 2015, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15932, Apr. 16, 2019]
[No. 48726-4-I.

Division One.

November 25, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Curtis Hansford, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 00-1-01163-1, Kenneth L. Cowsert, J., entered June 5, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J, concurred in by Becker, C.J., and Agid, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                                          0001072702
<NAME>                                         Fortune Entertainment Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-2-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,189
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,189
<PP&E>                                         73,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                 13,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,287,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,382,462
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    10
<COMMON>                                       2,583
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,902,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,287,334
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               24,089
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  409,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (385,749)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (385,749)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (385,749)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
#### § 248.4 Time for filing reports.

The report required by this part shall be filed with the Office of Airline Information within 15 days after the due date of the appropriate periodic BTS Form 41 Report, filed for the 12-month period covered by the audit report, or the date the accountant submits its audit report to the air carrier, whichever is later.

[ER-1351, 48 FR 32756, July 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 66725, Dec. 26, 1995]
EXHIBIT 10.60

    


    PROMISSORY
NOTE

    


    
      
        	
                $6,000,000.00

              	 
      	
                October
      2, 2009

              


      

    

    


    Mission West Properties,
L.P. II, a Delaware limited partnership (“Mission”)

    


    promises
to pay to            M&M
Real Estate Control & Restructuring.,
LLC                               

    


    the
principal sum of Six Million Dollars and 00 Cents ($6,000,000.00),

    


    plus
interest at the rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 2 percent per annum (compounded on the
basis of a 366-day year) beginning on the 2nd day of October, 2009.

    


    Should
interest not so be paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the
principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount
equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted
by law. Should default be made in the payment of any installment of interest
when due, the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately due
and payable at the option of the holder of this note.  Should suit be
commenced or an attorney employed to enforce the payment of this note, we agree
to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge as reasonable attorney’s
fees in said suit. Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the
United States.

    


    Principal
and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States no later than
December 31, 2010.  Notwithstanding the above, Mission shall use its
best efforts to repay the loan as soon as possible using all available sources
of cash, including but not limited to cash generated from operations and cash
available from any other financing sources.

     


    
      
        
          
            
              	
                      Signed By:

                    	 
      	
                      /s/ Raymond V. Marino

                    	 	
                      10/2/09

                    	 
      
	 
      	
                      Raymond V. Marino, Pres. & COO

                    	 	
                      Date

                    	 
      
	 
      	
                      Mission West Properties, Inc.

                    	 	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                      Its General Partner

                    	 	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 	 
      	 
      
	
                      Acknowledged:

                    	
                      /s/ Tom Meckenstock

                    	 	
                      10/2/09

                    	 
      
	 
      	
                      Tom Meckenstock, Managing Member

                    	 	
                      Date
#### Pauline Kim and Another, Infants, by Their Mother and Natural Guardian, Youn Bae Kim, et al., Appellants, v Dong Kim et al., Respondents.

[697 NYS2d 676]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated October 20, 1998, which granted the respective motions of the defendants Dong Kim and Alan Karl Jacobs for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the infant plaintiffs did not sustain serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

*191Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court did not err in ruling that the defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that the infant plaintiffs did not sustain serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and that the plaintiffs failed thereafter to demonstrate the existence of an issue of fact requiring a trial. The affidavits of the plaintiffs’ physician merely recited the measurements of the infant plaintiffs’ alleged limitations of cervical and lumbar motion that had been obtained 20 months earlier (less than two weeks after the accident). In addition, the physician’s affidavit failed to articulate any opinion as to permanency *(see, e.g., Mobley v Riportella,*241 AD2d 443; *Gill v O.N.S. Trucking,*239 AD2d 463; *Beckett v Conte,*176 AD2d 774). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0369

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ERIN ELLIOT HOLCOMB,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, Court 

Reporter Tami Corner is granted an extension of time to and including 

October 11, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve the 

transcripts requested on appeal.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 24 2022

08/24/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0369
Editorial Note on Part 47
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 75 FR 41979, July 20, 2010.

§ 47.69 Limitations. A Dealer's Aircraft Registration Certificate, AC Form 8050-6 is valid only in connection with use of aircraft— ( a ) By the owner of the aircraft to whom it was issued, his agent or employee, or a prospective buyer, and in the case of a dealer other than a manufacturer, only after he has complied with § 47.67;
( b ) Within the United States, except when used to deliver to a foreign purchaser an aircraft displaying a temporary registration number and carrying an airworthiness certificate on which that number is written;
( c ) While a certificate is carried within the aircraft; and
( d ) On a flight that is— ( 1 ) For required flight testing of aircraft; or
( 2 ) Necessary for, or incident to, sale of the aircraft.
However, a prospective buyer may operate an aircraft for demonstration purposes only while he is under the direct supervision of the holder of the Dealer's Aircraft Registration Certificate or his agent. [Doc. No. 7190, 31 FR 4495, Mar. 17, 1966; 31 FR 5483, Apr. 7, 1966, as amended by Amdt. 47-4, 32 FR 12556, Aug. 30, 1967; Amdt. 47-29, 75 FR 41983, July 20, 2010]
MILES

0 .5 1 1.5 2

Wainwright

Chukchi Sea

Wainwright 

Landfill

Airport 

Runway

Total depth of well: 1,613 ft

Natural Gamma

0 200

1.5 3

4 Caliper (inch) 8

Resistivity (16 N)

Resistivity (64 N)

Resistivity (lateral)

API-GR OHM-M

Depth

Wainwright-1

N 70o 38' 41.0"

W 160o 01' 18.7"

Total Depth of Well: 1,300 ft

Natural Gamma

0 200

Caliper

4 8

Resistivity (16 N)

Resistivity (64 N)

Resistivity (lateral)

API-GR OHM-M

Depth

inch

Wainwright-9 

N 70o 39' 58.6"

W 159o

 58' 13.0"

Total depth of well: 1,360 ft

Wainwright-10

N 70o 38' 05.8" 

W 160o 01' 45.6" 

Natural Gamma

0 200

1 2.5

4 Caliper (inch) 8

Resistivity (16 N)

Resistivity (64 N)

Resistivity (lateral)

API-GR OHM-M

Depth

Total depth of well: 2,450 ft

Natural Gamma

0 200

1 2.5

4 Caliper (inch) 8

Resistivity (16 N)

Resistivity (64 N)

API-GR OHM-M

Depth

W-OC1(Wainwright-8)

N 70o 38' 37.1"

W 160o 01' 25.9"

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

W-OC1 mud-gas log

gas units

Plate 2. Geophysical logs and logged-well locations, Wainwright, Alaska 

Coalbed Natural Gas Project, 2007–2010.

Density (g/cc)

Density

Density (g/cc) Density (g/cc)

feet feet feet feet 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100

Wainwright Coal Bed

Wainwright Coal Bed

and -2

N 70o 38' 41.0"

W 160o 01' 19.3"

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey ISSN 2331-1258 (online)

http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141004

Open-File Report 2014–1004

Plate 2
§ 29.1505 Never-exceed speed. ( a ) The never-exceed speed, V*NE,* must be established so that it is— ( 1 ) Not less than 40 knots (CAS); and
( 2 ) Not more than the lesser of— ( i ) 0.9 times the maximum forward speeds established under § 29.309;
( ii ) 0.9 times the maximum speed shown under §§ 29.251 and 29.629; or
( iii ) 0.9 times the maximum speed substantiated for advancing blade tip mach number effects under critical altitude conditions.
( b ) V*NE* may vary with altitude, r.p.m., temperature, and weight, if— ( 1 ) No more than two of these variables (or no more than two instruments integrating more than one of these variables) are used at one time; and
( 2 ) The ranges of these variables (or of the indications on instruments integrating more than one of these variables) are large enough to allow an operationally practical and safe variation of V*NE*.
( c ) For helicopters, a stabilized power-off V*NE* denoted as V*NE* (power-off) may be established at a speed less than V*NE* established pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) V*NE* (power-off) is not less than a speed midway between the power-on V*NE* and the speed used in meeting the requirements of— ( i ) § 29.67(a)(3) for Category A helicopters;
( ii ) § 29.65(a) for Category B helicopters, except multi-engine helicopters meeting the requirements of § 29.67(b); and
( iii ) § 29.67(b) for multi-engine Category B helicopters meeting the requirements of § 29.67(b).
( 2 ) V*NE* (power-off) is— ( i ) A constant airspeed;
( ii ) A constant amount less than power-on V*NE;* or
( iii ) A constant airspeed for a portion of the altitude range for which certification is requested, and a constant amount less than power-on V*NE* for the remainder of the altitude range.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 971, Jan. 26, 1968, as amended by Amdt. 29-15, 43 FR 2327, Jan. 16, 1978; Amdt. 29-24, 49 FR 44440, Nov. 6, 1984]
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.411 Motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. ( a ) At any time after an answer has been filed, any party may file with the DOT decisionmaker or the administrative law judge a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment, including supporting affidavits. The procedure on such motions shall be in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 U.S.C.), particularly Rules 6(d), 7(b), 12, and 56, except that answers and supporting papers to a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment shall be filed within seven (7) days after service of the motion.
( b ) Parties may petition the DOT decisionmaker to review any action by the administrative law judge granting summary judgment or dismissing an enforcement proceeding under the procedure established for review of an initial decision in § 302.32.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ Lawrence D. BainLawrence D. BainPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Michael S. BrowneMichael S. BrowneChief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer