60774 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

class mail, within seven (7) working 

days of the date on which the seller 

discovers it cannot provide a refund by 

the same method as payment was 

tendered; 

(2) Where a refund is made pursuant 

to paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section, a 

refund sent by any means at least as fast 

and reliable as first class mail within 

one (1) billing cycle from the date on 

which the buyer’s right to refund vests 

under the provisions of this part. 

(c) Receipt of a properly completed 

order shall mean, where the buyer 

tenders full or partial payment in the 

proper amount in the form of: cash, 

check, or money order; authorization 

from the buyer to charge an existing 

charge account; or other payment 

methods, the time at which the seller 

receives both said payment and an order 

from the buyer containing all of the 

information needed by the seller to 

process and ship the order. Provided, 

however, that where the seller receives 

notice that a payment by means other 

than cash or credit as tendered by the 

buyer has been dishonored or that the 

buyer does not qualify for a credit sale, 

receipt of a properly completed order 

shall mean the time at which: 

(1) The seller receives notice that a 

payment by means other than cash or 

credit in the proper amount tendered by 

the buyer has been honored; 

(2) The buyer tenders cash in the 

proper amount; or 

(3) The seller receives notice that the 

buyer qualifies for a credit sale. 

(d) Refund shall mean: 

(1) Where the buyer tendered full 

payment for the unshipped merchandise 

in the form of cash, check, or money 

order, a return of the amount tendered 

in the form of cash, check, or money 

order sent to the buyer; 

(2) Where there is a credit sale: 

(i) And the seller is a creditor, a copy 

of a credit memorandum or the like or 

an account statement sent to the buyer 

reflecting the removal or absence of any 

remaining charge incurred as a result of 

the sale from the buyer’s account; 

(ii) And a third party is the creditor, 

an appropriate credit memorandum or 

the like sent to the third party creditor 

which will remove the charge from the 

buyer’s account and a copy of the credit 

memorandum or the like sent to the 

buyer that includes the date that the 

seller sent the credit memorandum or 

the like to the third party creditor and 

the amount of the charge to be removed, 

or a statement from the seller sent to the 

buyer acknowledging the cancellation of 

the order and representing that it has 

not taken any action regarding the order 

which will result in a charge to the 

buyer’s account with the third party; 

(iii) And the buyer tendered partial 

payment for the unshipped merchandise 

in the form of cash, check, or money 

order, a return of the amount tendered 

in the form of cash, check, or money 

order sent to the buyer. 

(3) Where the buyer tendered 

payment for the unshipped merchandise 

by any means other than those 

enumerated in paragraph (d)(1) or (2) of 

this section: 

(i) Instructions sent to the entity that 

transferred payment to the seller 

instructing that entity to return to the 

buyer the amount tendered in the form 

tendered and a statement sent to the 

buyer setting forth the instructions sent 

to the entity, including the date of the 

instructions and the amount to be 

returned to the buyer; or 

(ii) A return of the amount tendered 

in the form of cash, check, or money 

order sent to the buyer; or 

(iii) A statement from the seller sent 

to the buyer acknowledging the 

cancellation of the order and 

representing that the seller has not taken 

any action regarding the order which 

will access any of the buyer’s funds. 

* * * * * 

4. Amend § 435.2 by revising the 

introductory text of the section and the 

introductory text of paragraph (a)(1) to 

read as follows: 

§ 435.2 Mail or telephone order sales. 

In connection with mail, Internet, or 

telephone order sales in or affecting 

commerce, as ‘‘commerce’’ is defined in 

the Federal Trade Commission Act, it 

constitutes an unfair method of 

competition, and an unfair or deceptive 

act or practice for a seller: 

(a)(1) To solicit any order for the sale 

of merchandise to be ordered by the 

buyer through the mail, via the Internet, 

or by telephone unless, at the time of 

the solicitation, the seller has a 

reasonable basis to expect that it will be 

able to ship any ordered merchandise to 

the buyer: 

* * * * * 

By direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–24354 Filed 9–29–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6750–01–P 

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN 

COMMISSION 

18 CFR Part 806 

Review and Approval of Projects 

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; 

reopening of comment period. 

SUMMARY: The purpose of this document 

is to inform the public of an extension 

of the comment period for proposed 

rules of the Susquehanna River Basin 

Commission (Commission) as published 

in the Federal Register of July 13, 2011. 

DATES: The deadline extension of the 

public comment period is November 10, 

2011. Comments on the proposed rule 

published July 13, 2011 (76 FR 41154) 

may be submitted to the Commission on 

or before November 10, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Address all comments to 

Richard A. Cairo, General Counsel, 

Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 

1721 North Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 

17102–2391 or by e-mail to 

rcairo@srbc.net. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard A. Cairo, General Counsel, 

telephone: (717) 238–0423, ext. 306; fax: 

(717) 238–2436; e-mail: rcairo@srbc.net. 

Also, for further information on the 

proposed rules, visit the Commission’s 

Web site at http://www.srbc.net. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

public is hereby advised that, at its 

regular business meeting on September 

15, 2011, in Milford, New York, the 

Commission extended to November 10, 

2011, the written comment deadline for 

proposed rules that appeared in 76 FR 

41154–41157 July 13, 2011. This action 

to extend the public comment period 

and delay action on the proposed rules 

is based on the level of public interest 

indicated in the comments received 

thus far by the Commission. 

Authority: Pub. L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509 et 

seq., 18 CFR Parts 806, 807, and 808. 

Dated: September 20, 2011. 

Thomas W. Beauduy, 

Deputy Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 2011–25159 Filed 9–29–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7040–01–P 

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 

Copyright Office 

37 CFR Parts 201 and 202 

[Docket No. 2011–8] 

Discontinuance of Form CO in 

Registration Practices 

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of 

Congress. 

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

and request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The United States Copyright 

Office is proposing to amend its 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules 60775 

regulations to discontinue use of the 

Form CO application as an option for 

applying for copyright registration; and 

remove the references to CON 1 and 

CON 2 sheets. Form CO applications 

comprise only a small percentage of all 

applications submitted but they contain 

a significant number of errors, thus 

requiring a disproportionate amount of 

the Office’s time, effort and resources to 

process. The proposed amendments 

would remove references to Form CO 

and would instead allow applicants a 

choice to file an application for 

registration either by filing the 

application electronically or by using 

the appropriate printed application form 

that relates to the subject matter of the 

application (i.e., Form TX for 

nondramatic literary works, Form PA 

for works of the performing arts, Form 

VA for works of visual art, Form SR for 

sound recordings, and Form SE for 

serials). Additionally, the proposed 

amendment would remove the 

references to CON 1 and CON 2 sheets, 

which were never developed or made 

available to the public, and would 

instead refer only to the continuation 

sheets currently available for applicants 

filing paper applications. 

DATES: Comments must be received in 

the Office of the General Counsel of the 

Copyright Office no later than 

November 29, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: The Copyright Office 

strongly prefers that comments be 

submitted electronically. A comment 

submission page is posted on the 

Copyright Office Web site at http:// 

www.copyright.gov/docs/formco/. The 

Web site interface requires submitters to 

complete a form specifying name and 

other required information, and to 

upload comments as an attachment. To 

meet accessibility standards, all 

comments must be uploaded in a single 

file in either the Adobe Portable 

Document File (PDF) format that 

contains searchable, accessible text (not 

an image); Microsoft Word; 

WordPerfect; Rich Text Format (RTF); or 

ASCII text file format (not a scanned 

document). The maximum file size is 6 

megabytes (MB). The name of the 

submitter and organization should 

appear on both the form and the face of 

the comments. All comments will be 

posted publicly on the Copyright Office 

Web site exactly as they are received, 

along with names and organizations if 

provided. If electronic submission of 

comments is not feasible, please contact 

the Copyright Office at (202) 707–8380 

for special instructions. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tanya Sandros, Deputy General 

Counsel, Copyright Office, GC/I&R, P.O. 

Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024. 

Telephone: (202) 707–8380. Telefax: 

(202) 707–8366. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2007, 

the Copyright Office began an extensive 

business process reengineering initiative 

that had an impact on a variety of 

registration-related activities. See 72 FR 

36883 (July 6, 2007). As part of this 

initiative, the Office promulgated 

interim regulations regarding how the 

public submits and the Office processes 

copyright applications. Id. In these 

interim regulations, the Office 

announced four ways to file an 

application for registration. At the time, 

the Office used the term ‘‘Form CO’’ 

generically in its regulations to cover all 

four approaches to registration. With the 

implementation of the new electronic 

registration practices, however, Form 

CO was used to describe a specific form 

that is filled out on a computer and that 

uses barcodes to capture the information 

entered by the claimant. This newer 

incarnation of Form CO, first made 

available in 2008, was intended to 

simplify the application process and 

replace the traditional paper forms 

Forms TX, VA, PA, SR, and SE. See 72 

FR at 36885; 37 CFR 202.3(b)(2)(ii). 

However, following the implementation 

of reengineering, it eventually became 

clear (for reasons discussed below) that 

Form CO did not live up to its 

expectations because many users of the 

form made entries on the form that were 

not captured in the barcodes and 

therefore were not carried over into the 

Office’s registration records. Indeed, 

experience of the past couple of years 

has demonstrated that the costs to the 

Office in offering and processing Form 

CO far outweigh the benefits, and the 

Office proposes to eliminate this 

application option. 

The regulations also referred to two 

additional continuation sheets, CON 1 

and CON 2, which the Office intended 

to be used in connection with Form CO 

and would have allowed applicants to 

provide additional information that 

would not fit within the bar codes to be 

generated by Form CO. See 72 FR at 

36886. However, the Office never 

developed these new continuation 

sheets and continued to accept the 

traditional Form CON for providing 

additional information. See http:// 

www.copyright.gov/forms/formcon.pdf. 

For this reason, the Office proposes to 

amend its regulations by removing 

references to CON 1 and CON 2. 

1. Issues with Form CO. Although 

Form CO is not commonly used, it does 

present a disproportionate number of 

problems for the Office. For example, 

sometimes after filling out Form CO 

using the free Adobe Reader software, 

printing the form and closing out the 

program, the applicant would like to 

provide additional information. As 

many people are aware (and as the 

product itself warns), the free Adobe 

Reader software does not save the 

content once the document is closed, 

leaving the applicant with two choices 

to make corrections: To fill out the form 

again online or fill in the missing 

elements by hand. Many applicants 

have elected to fill in the additional 

information by hand. Unfortunately, 

writing on the form does not embed the 

added information into the barcode and, 

as a result, either additional time and 

resources are required for the Office to 

manually input this information into the 

system, or it may be missed in the 

ingestion process altogether. 

The Office has also noted that some 

applicants using the more expensive 

Adobe Professional software work from 

a previously submitted form when 

preparing a new application for another 

work. In this scenario, the applicant 

prints out the original saved form 

because it includes all the basic 

information needed for registering the 

new work except for perhaps the title 

and the date of publication. The 

applicant then proceeds to ‘‘white-out’’ 

the erroneous information and type in 

or write in the new data associated with 

the later work. The new data entered 

manually on the form is not embedded 

into the barcode. 

Errors like these result in 

discrepancies between the text on the 

application and the information 

embedded in the barcode. Because the 

errors occur on a fairly regular basis, 

Copyright Office staff are unsure 

whether and when to rely on the 

information that appears in the barcode 

of the applications. In order to exercise 

due diligence, staff instead undertake 

time-consuming comparisons of the 

printed text against the information 

ingested through the barcode, a process 

that defeats all the efficiencies promised 

by this technology. 

Human error is not the only concern. 

The use of barcodes presents other 

unique problems associated with the 

technology. Barcodes can be 

compromised and thus fail to function 

properly. For example, the barcodes 

may be torn on one or more pages of the 

printed form or the applicant’s printer 

may have distorted the barcode due to 

a number of technical difficulties, e.g., 

low toner, making it impossible to scan 

the data into the system. In these cases, 

the information on a Form CO 

application must be manually entered 

into the online registration system. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
60776 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

For these reasons, and because Form 

CO represents a very small percentage of 

applications received by the Office, 

(e.g., approximately two percent of 

applicants submitted since January 2011 

have been submitted on Form CO), the 

Office has concluded that the use of 

Form CO should be discontinued. 

Eliminating Form CO will simplify 

the registration process for the 

Copyright Office and leave applicants 

with two options to register their works: 

They may submit applications for 

registration electronically or they may 

use the traditional paper forms, e.g., 

Form TX, Form PA, Form VA, Form SR, 

and Form SE. Applications submitted 

electronically allow processing more 

quickly. However, both methods will 

lead to higher probability of accuracy 

than using Form CO. 

2. CON 1 and CON 2 Forms. Although 

the regulations published in 2007 

envisioned the creation and use of 

specialized continuation sheets for use 

with Form CO, the Copyright Office 

never created these forms. In the 

meantime, in circumstances when it is 

necessary or desirable to provide 

additional information, applicants 

continue to use the existing 

continuation sheet, Form CON. Because 

the Office is proposing to discontinue 

Form CO and never created the CON 1 

and CON 2 forms that were to be used 

with Form CO, the Office now proposes 

to amend its regulations to remove 

references to the CON 1 and CON 2 

forms. Note, however, that those 

applicants using paper applications may 

continue to use existing Form CON See 

http://www.copyright.gov/forms/ 

formcon.pdf. 

Accordingly, the Office proposes to 

amend its regulations to formally 

discontinue use of Form CO, and to 

eliminate references to CON 1 and CON 

2. In lieu of these options, applicants 

may use the online registration system 

to file applications electronically (in 

cases where electronic filing is 

available) or use the existing paper 

application forms. As a related point of 

clarity, the Office also proposes to 

amend §§ 202.3(b)(10)(iv)(D) and (v) of 

the regulations, relating to group 

registration of published photographs, 

to clarify that the references therein to 

‘‘special continuation sheet’’ are 

references to Form GR/PPh/CON. 

List of Subjects 

37 CFR Part 201 

Copyright, General provisions 

37 CFR Part 202 

Copyright, Registration of claims to 

copyright. 

Proposed Regulations 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Copyright Office proposes to amend 

parts 201 and 202 of 37 CFR, as follows: 

PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS 

1. The authority citation for part 201 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702. 

§ 201.3 [Amended] 

2. Amend § 201.3(c) by removing the 

line beginning ‘‘Form-D barcode 

application properly completed online) 

* * *’’ and ‘‘; and Form CO without 

barcodes or incomplete information, or 

information added after printing (paper 

filing)’’ from item (1) of the fee chart 

titled ‘‘Registration, Recordation and 

Related Services.’’ 

PART 202—PREREGISTRATION AND 

REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO 

COPYRIGHT 

3. The authority citation for part 202 

reads as follows: 

Authority: 17 U.S.C. 409 and 702. 

§ 202.3 [Amended] 

4. Amend § 202.3(b) by revising 

paragraph (b)(2) and (b)(3). 

5. Amend § 202.3(b)(10) by adding 

‘‘(Form GR/PPh/CON)’’ after the phrase 

‘‘special continuation sheet’’ wherever it 

appears. 

6. Amend § 202.3(c)(2) by removing ‘‘, 

electronically or in printed form, on the 

appropriate form prescribed by the 

Register of Copyrights under’’ and by 

adding ‘‘by using one of the methods set 

forth in’’ in its place. 

7. In § 202.3 revise paragraphs 

(b)(2)(i)–(ii) and (b)(3) to read as follows: 

§ 202.3 Registration of copyright. 

* * * * * 

(b)(2) Application for registration. For 

purposes of registration, an applicant 

may submit an application for 

registration of individual works and 

certain groups of works electronically 

through the Copyright Office’s Web site, 

or by using the printed forms prescribed 

by the Register of Copyrights. 

(i) An applicant may submit an 

application electronically through the 

Copyright Office Web site [http:// 

www.copyright.gov]. An online 

submission requires a payment of the 

application fee through an electronic 

fund transfer, credit card, or through a 

Copyright Office deposit account. 

Deposit materials in support of the 

online application may be submitted in 

a digital format along with the 

application and payment, or deposit 

materials in physically tangible formats 

may be separately mailed to the 

Copyright Office, using a mailing label 

generated during the online registration 

process, or 

(ii) (A) Alternatively, an applicant 

may submit an application on one of the 

printed forms prescribed by the Register 

of Copyrights. Each printed form 

corresponds to a class set forth in 

paragraph (b)(1) of this section and is so 

designated (‘‘Form TX’’; ‘‘Form PA’’; 

‘‘Form VA’’; ‘‘Form SR’’; ‘‘Form SE’’; 

and ‘‘Form SE/Group’’). Printed form 

applications should be submitted in the 

class most appropriate to the nature of 

the authorship in which copyright is 

claimed. In the case of contributions to 

collective works, applications should be 

submitted in the class representing the 

copyrightable authorship in the 

contribution. In the case of derivative 

works, applications should be submitted 

in the class most appropriately 

representing the copyrightable 

authorship involved in recasting, 

transforming, adapting, or otherwise 

modifying the preexisting work. In cases 

where a work contains elements of 

authorship in which copyright is 

claimed which fall into two or more 

classes, the application should be 

submitted in the class most appropriate 

to the type of authorship that 

predominates in the work as a whole. 

However, in any case where registration 

is sought for a work consisting of or 

including a sound recording in which 

copyright is claimed the application 

shall be submitted on Form SR. Copies 

of the printed forms are available on the 

Copyright Office’s Web site [http:// 

www.copyright.gov] and upon request to 

the Copyright Public Information Office, 

Library of Congress. 

(B) Printed form applications may be 

completed and submitted by completing 

a printed version or using a PDF version 

of the applicable Copyright Office 

application form and mailing it together 

with the other required elements, i.e., 

physically tangible deposit copies and/ 

or materials, and the required filing fee, 

all elements being placed in the same 

package and sent by mail or handdelivered to the Copyright Office. 

(b)(3) Continuation sheets. A 

continuation sheet is appropriate only 

in the case when a printed form 

application is used and where 

additional space is needed by the 

applicant to provide all relevant 

information concerning a claim to 

copyright. An application may include 

more than one continuation sheet, 

subject to the limitations in paragraphs 

(b)(10)(v) of this section. 

* * * * * 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules 60777 

Dated: September 27, 2011. 

Maria A. Pallante, 

Register of Copyrights. 

[FR Doc. 2011–25230 Filed 9–29–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–30–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2010–0406; FRL–9473–8] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; North Dakota; 

Regional Haze State Implementation 

Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for 

Interstate Transport of Pollution 

Affecting Visibility and Regional Haze; 

Correction of Public Hearing 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule; Correction of 

Public Hearing. 

SUMMARY: EPA is changing the public 

hearing arrangements for our proposed 

action on North Dakota’s State 

Implementation Plans (SIPs) addressing 

regional haze and the interstate 

transport of pollutants that interfere 

with programs to protect visibility in 

other states. We are making this change 

in response to a letter that the Governor 

of North Dakota submitted on 

September 9, 2011. 

DATES: Public hearings will be held 

October 13–14, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: The public hearings will be 

held at the North Dakota Department of 

Health, Environmental Training Center, 

2639 East Main Avenue, Bismarck, ND 

58506. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gail 

Fallon, EPA Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 

1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO, 

80202–1129, (303) 312–6281, 

Fallon.Gail@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

September 21, 2011 we published a 

proposed rule partially approving and 

partially disapproving a revision to the 

North Dakota SIP addressing regional 

haze and disapproving a revision to the 

North Dakota SIP for interstate transport 

of pollutants that interfere with 

programs to protect visibility in other 

states. See 76 FR 58570. To 

accommodate the Governor of North 

Dakota’s request submitted in a letter 

dated September 9, 2011 for additional 

hearing time, we have changed the 

location to the North Dakota Department 

of Health’s Environmental Training 

Center, 2639 East Main Avenue, 

Bismarck, ND 58506. We have changed 

the schedule to provide four different 

hearing sessions. Public hearings will 

now be held on Thursday, October 13, 

2011 from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m., and again 

from 7 p.m. until 9 p.m. A second day 

of public hearings will be held on 

Friday, October 14, 2011 from 8 a.m. 

until 12 p.m., and again from 1 p.m. 

until 5 p.m. 

The public hearings will provide 

interested parties the opportunity to 

present information and opinions to 

EPA concerning our proposal. Interested 

parties may also submit written 

comments, as discussed in the proposal. 

Written statements and supporting 

information submitted during the 

comment period will be considered 

with the same weight as any oral 

comments and supporting information 

presented at the public hearings. We 

will not respond to comments during 

the public hearings. When we publish 

our final action, we will provide written 

responses to all oral and written 

comments received on our proposal. 

At the public hearings, the hearing 

officer may limit the time available for 

each commenter to address the proposal 

to 5 minutes or less if the hearing officer 

determines it to be appropriate. The 

limitation is to ensure that everyone 

who wants to make a comment has the 

opportunity to do so. We will not be 

providing equipment for commenters to 

show overhead slides or make 

computerized slide presentations. Any 

person may provide written or oral 

comments and data pertaining to our 

proposal at the public hearings. 

Verbatim transcripts, in English, of the 

hearings and written statements will be 

included in the rulemaking docket. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: September 23, 2011. 

James B. Martin, 

Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

[FR Doc. 2011–25293 Filed 9–29–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 300 

[EPA–R04–SFUND–2011–0749; FRL–9472– 

9] 

National Oil and Hazardous 

Substances Pollution Contingency 

Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion 

of the Martin-Marietta/Sodyeco 

Superfund Site 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Region 4 is issuing a 

Notice of Intent to Delete the MartinMarietta/Sodyeco Superfund Site (Site), 

which is a portion of the Clariant 

Corporation property located at 11701 

Mount Holly Road in Charlotte, North 

Carolina, from the National Priorities 

List (NPL) and requests comment on 

this proposed action. The NPL, 

promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (CERCLA or Superfund) of 1980, as 

amended, is an appendix of the National 

Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP). EPA, with the 

concurrence of the State of North 

Carolina, through the Department of 

Environment and Natural Resources 

(DENR), has determined that all 

appropriate response actions under 

CERCLA, other than operation, 

maintenance, and five-year reviews, 

have been completed. However, this 

deletion does not preclude future 

actions under Superfund if deemed 

necessary by EPA. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

October 31, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID no. EPA–R04– 

SFUND–2011–0749, by one of the 

following methods: 

• Online: http://www.regulations.gov. 

Follow instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: townsend.michael@epa.gov. 

• Fax: 404 562–8788 Attention: 

Michael Townsend. 

• Mail: Michael Townsend, Remedial 

Project Manager, Superfund Remedial 

Section, Superfund Remedial Branch, 

Superfund Division, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth 

Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303– 

8960. 

• Hand delivery: U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth 

Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303– 

8960. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS