alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1



ACTUATE CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES

as of December 31, 2006



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary Name                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|Actuate Asia Pacific Pty. Ltd. Actuate Canada Corporation Actuate Cayman Limited Actuate Pte. Limited Actuate France, S.A. Actuate Software GmbH Actuate International Sarl Actuate International Corporation Actuate Japan Co., Ltd. Actuate Limited Actuate Software (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. Actuate UK Ltd. Nimble Technology, Inc. Tidestone Technologies, Inc. performancesoft, Inc. performancesoft International Ltd. Panorama Business Views (US),
Inc. |  | Australia Canada Cayman Islands Singapore France Germany Switzerland State of Delaware, United States of America Japan Hong Kong Peoples Republic of China United Kingdom State of Delaware, United States of America State of Kansas, United States of
America Canada United Kingdom State of Delaware, United States of America
§ 135.269 Flight time limitations and rest requirements: Unscheduled three- and four-pilot crews. ( a ) No certificate holder may assign any flight crewmember, and no flight crewmember may accept an assignment, for flight time as a member of a three- or four-pilot crew if that crewmember's total flight time in all commercial flying will exceed— ( 1 ) 500 hours in any calendar quarter.
( 2 ) 800 hours in any two consecutive calendar quarters.
( 3 ) 1,400 hours in any calendar year.
( b ) No certificate holder may assign any pilot to a crew of three or four pilots, unless that assignment provides— ( 1 ) At least 10 consecutive hours of rest immediately preceding the assignment;
( 2 ) No more than 8 hours of flight deck duty in any 24 consecutive hours;
( 3 ) No more than 18 duty hours for a three-pilot crew or 20 duty hours for a four-pilot crew in any 24 consecutive hours;
( 4 ) No more than 12 hours aloft for a three-pilot crew or 16 hours aloft for a four-pilot crew during the maximum duty hours specified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section;
( 5 ) Adequate sleeping facilities on the aircraft for the relief pilot;
( 6 ) Upon completion of the assignment, a rest period of at least 12 hours;
( 7 ) For a three-pilot crew, a crew which consists of at least the following: ( i ) A pilot in command (PIC) who meets the applicable flight crewmember requirements of subpart E of part 135;
( ii ) A PIC who meets the applicable flight crewmember requirements of subpart E of part 135, except those prescribed in §§ 135.244 and 135.247; and
( iii ) A second in command (SIC) who meets the SIC qualifications of § 135.245.
( 8 ) For a four-pilot crew, at least three pilots who meet the conditions of paragraph (b)(7) of this section, plus a fourth pilot who meets the SIC qualifications of § 135.245.
( c ) When a flight crewmember has exceeded the daily flight deck duty limitation in this section by more than 60 minutes, because of circumstances beyond the control of the certificate holder or flight crewmember, that flight crewmember must have a rest period before the next duty period of at least 16 consecutive hours.
( d ) A certificate holder must provide each flight crewmember at least 13 rest periods of at least 24 consecutive hours each in each calendar quarter.
§ 27.917 Design. ( a ) Each rotor drive system must incorporate a unit for each engine to automatically disengage that engine from the main and auxiliary rotors if that engine fails.
( b ) Each rotor drive system must be arranged so that each rotor necessary for control in autorotation will continue to be driven by the main rotors after disengagement of the engine from the main and auxiliary rotors.
( c ) If a torque limiting device is used in the rotor drive system, it must be located so as to allow continued control of the rotorcraft when the device is operating.
( d ) The rotor drive system includes any part necessary to transmit power from the engines to the rotor hubs. This includes gear boxes, shafting, universal joints, couplings, rotor brake assemblies, clutches, supporting bearings for shafting, any attendant accessory pads or drives, and any cooling fans that are a part of, attached to, or mounted on the rotor drive system.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-11, 41 FR 55469, Dec. 20, 1976]
#### § 375.33 Transit flights, irregular operations.

Foreign civil aircraft carrying passengers, property or mail for remuneration or hire, but not engaged in scheduled international air services, are authorized to navigate nonstop across the territory of the United States and to make stops for non-traffic purposes. The navigation of foreign civil aircraft in the United States is not authorized under this section when the elapsed time between landing and takeoff at a stop in the United States exceeds 24 hours and passengers are permitted to leave the airport or when passengers, property or mail are transferred to another aircraft. Flights involving stops under such circumstances may, however, be performed in the case of emergency relating to the safety of the aircraft, passengers, cargo or crew.

[OST Doc. No. 42547, 51 FR 7254, Mar. 3, 1986, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019]
<PAGE>   1
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-95933, 333-95279, 333-87553, 333-36228,
333-40476, 333-44418, 333-51504) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-36382, 333-38000,
333-39958) of Critical Path, Inc. of our report dated April 4, 2001 relating to
the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


San Francisco, California
April 4, 2001
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

SHELLY SEBASTIAN

VERSUS

LOUISIANA STATE POLICE

RETIREMENT SYSTEM, KIM GANN, 

AND IRVING FELPS

NO. 2021 CW 1496

FEBRUARY 25, 2022

In Re: Shelly Sabastian, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 697, 794. 

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. The writ application did not include

documentation of the return date in violation of Rule 4- 3 of the

Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Thus, we cannot

determine whether the writ application was timely filed. 

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an

application for rehearing will not be considered. Rules 2- 18. 7

4- 9, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. 

In the event relator seeks to file a new application with

this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation, 

including the missing items noted above, must comply with Rule

2- 12. 211 Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, and must

show that any delay in filing was not due to the applicant' s

fault. Rule 4- 3, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. 

Any new application must be filed on or before March 28, 2022, 

and must contain a copy of this ruling. 

VGW

AHP

CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY OLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Office of Transportation and Air Quality

EPA-420-F-13-041

August 2013

EPA Denies Petitions for Reconsideration of the Final Rule Establishing the 

2013 Biomass-Based Diesel Volume

Introduction

On September 27, 2012, EPA established a 2013 volume requirement of 1.28 billion 

gallons under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program. In November 2012, the 

American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) and the American Petroleum Institute (API) each individually submitted a Petition for Reconsideration of 

this final rule. After considering all the issues raised by petitioners, EPA has determined that the objections raised in these petitions do not warrant a reconsideration 

of the biomass-based diesel volume requirement for 2013.

General Background

The petitions were submitted under the reconsideration provisions of section 307(d)

(7)(B) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Under this provision, a petitioner must show 

why an issue could not have been raised during the comment period, either because 

it was impracticable to raise the issue during that time or because the grounds for the 

issue arose after the period for public comment. The petitioner must also show that 

the issue is of central relevance to the outcome of the rule and would thus provide 

substantial support for the argument that the regulation should be revised.

EPA is denying both petitions because they fail to meet one or both of these criteria. In all cases, the objections raised in these petitions either were or could have 

been raised during the comment period on the proposed rule, or are not of central 

relevance to the outcome of the rule because they do not provide substantial support 

for the argument that the 2013 biomass-based diesel volume requirement should be 

revised as suggested by petitioners.

Program Announcement
2

Program Announcement

For More Information

For more information on this proposal, please visit the RFS website at:

www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels

To submit a question on the RFS program, and to view Frequently Asked Questions, please visit:

www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/compliancehelp/index.htm
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pulaski      Financial as of and for the period covered by the  Report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      December 18, 2009 | /s/ Gary W. Douglass |
|------------------------------|----------------------|
|                         | Name:                | Gary      W. Douglass |
|                         | Title:               | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30421-30422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial properly such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.

[[Page 30422]]

    Date: June 16, 2000.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Westin Fairfax Hotel, 2100 Massachusetts Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20008.
    Contact Person: Craig A. Jordan, Chief, Scientific Review 
Branch, NIH/NIDCD/DER, Executive Plaza South, Room 400C, Bethesda, 
MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 4, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-11766 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
U.S Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

2501 Meacham Blvd 

Fort Worth, Texas 76137 

Re: FAA Case No: 2014SW700104 

Dear FAA, 

nt:CEIVED 

FEB I 0 2015 

HEARING DOCKET 

dO\L:)- o(~Qc::) 

James Juaquin Jordan 

11980 Carriage Park Lane 

Johns Creek, GA 30097 

Please consider this letter a request for a formal hearing. I can reached via the above stated address. 

Sincerely, 

James Juaquin Jordan 
K-UPS® (1-800-742-5877) 

may only contain 

nic media, and must 

ng items other than 

ed by weight. 

uments of no commercial 

s documents. Visit 

classified as a document. 

e must weigh 8 oz. or less. 

 be billed by weight. 

of nwdtiJ 

f); . flO\ Sl"IHi l dSil 

") 

"::_-:'l 

V-2> 

.... 

LL 

0 

... '" 

.tt:: g;: 1-

..J.o::fS 

o> m 

..J..:.:G 

3· 

... w 

N 

'" ' '" z 0 cr N D 

D 7 0 

M <'> 

0 7 0 

'> # o::: cr 

zow '" 0 (f) 

l-IND::: cr 

..J!::.::: 

Clll- <.!lW 

crro(J) 

OCt: 

r-:>N(J)NCJU 

w a r--. z 

Ei-WWCD::;: 

<r<:tii-r-0 

(f) ..... '--:> 

This envelope is for use with the following services: 

I pr - I c;;J 

I I 

lUi 

z 

0 "" I "'I- "' "' ... Ill ... a: .... I 0:: 3 

Ul- N t$) """ z I-UJ3D'll VI -u:"'o 1('.1 

.,_, VI LC5::Ji 

"""' ........... ""'' IUCJ: ,- ,. -' uz "' UJ o::::ro 0 u F t-•-41-1-Z 

Ot-tOt-tZ<::> 

O>OO:::IJ.It---

CCI:C3fh11...!!:11 :::=··,,::: : .. +1.< 

CJ..JCJzc:Z: .... ·r,,:eJ......:..:..·:.$ Zc:tZO:::Z&--11 ::':...i ;::.:(. 

.. :.0 ·X>: ;:.;: . @)_f:r- ...... :- LIJLLJLLJ....aiS) ::t: Ll.. ::r:: 3 U) =:::r.:: . .. .. ··: v ... ;•. 

"- • .... ·.< f' 0 • .::: 

-a 

.-1 

I 

<» 

,..._ 

<n 

en 

-

= 

0:::: an 

,__, -

--

a: = 

...., 

>- -""' 

a: 0::.:: 

0 en <0 

I- ...... 

>< 

-

. 

-

w = 

z = = 

U') """' <J a_ a:. 

::::) 

Do not use this envelope for: 

UPS Ground UPS Standard 

UPS 3 Day Select@ 

UPS Worldwide Expedited® 

a: 

ll' 

'" 0 

N H 0 > u 0£ '" 0 

,. d 

7 7 

00 

N 

w 

n z 

0 u 

D i! 

g 

" I ,, "' H - n 

H 

H 

H 

tb 

iii 

H[ 

;:;':<i! 

..., Ui 

- m "' 

u. g "' "
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.302 Filing of applications. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, applications for exemption shall conform to the requirements of §§ 302.3 and 302.4.
( b ) Applications for exemption from section 41101 or 41301 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII (including those that incorporate an exemption from section 41504) that involve ten (10) or fewer flights may be submitted to the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division or the Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division (as appropriate), Office of International Aviation, on OST Form 4536. However, that form may not be used for: ( 1 ) Applications filed under section 40109(g) of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII;
( 2 ) Applications by persons who do not have either: ( i ) An effective air carrier certificate or foreign air carrier permit from the Department, or
( ii ) A properly completed application for such a certificate or permit, and an effective exemption from the Department for operations similar to those proposed;
( 3 ) Successive applications for the same or similar authority that would total more than ten (10) flights; or
( 4 ) Any other application for which the Department decides the requirements of §§ 302.3 and 302.4 are more appropriate. Upon a showing of good cause, an application may be filed by cablegram, telegram, facsimile, electronic mail (when available), or telephone; all such telephonic requests must be confirmed by written application within three (3) business days of the original request.
( c ) Applications for exemption from Chapter 415 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, from tariffs (except for waivers filed under subpart Q of part 221 of this chapter), or from Department regulations concerning tariffs may be submitted by letter. Three copies of such applications shall be sent to Department of Transportation Dockets. Upon a showing of good cause, the application may also be filed by cablegram, telegram, facsimile, electronic mail (when available), or telephone; all such requests must be confirmed by written application within three (3) business days of the original request.
( d ) Applications filed under paragraph (a) of this section shall be docketed and any additional documents filed shall be identified by the assigned docket number.
( e ) Applications filed under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section will normally not be docketed. The Department may require such applications to be docketed if appropriate. The Department will publish a notice of such applications in its Weekly List of Applications Filed.
#### § 31.31 General.

The suitability of each design detail or part that bears on safety must be established by tests or analysis.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                       547
<INVENTORY>                                      4,235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,052
<PP&E>                                         211,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,454
<BONDS>                                         54,707
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,214
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,201
<SALES>                                        118,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,069
<CGS>                                           33,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,453
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   168
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,189
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        

</TABLE>
#### Elinore I. Johnson, Respondent, *v.*Francis D. Winslow et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Munds, Winslow and Potter, Appellants.

(Submitted September 28, 1936;

decided October 6, 1936.)

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 272 N. Y. 467.)