alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 6, 2022

No. 04-22-00598-CR

EX PARTE Jesus Alfredo GARCIA CASTILLO

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10574CR

Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was due by September 22, 2022. On September 26, 2022, the court 

reporter filed a notification of late record requesting an extension until October 10, 2022 to file 

the reporter’s record. After consideration, we grant the extension and order the court reporter 

to file the record by October 10, 2022.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of October, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report  included  in  this  Form  10-K/A  Amendment  No.  1 into  the  Company's
previously  filed  Registration  Statements  File  Nos.  333-53657,   333-53765,
333-92003, 333-79151, 333-40472, 333-43768, 333-60294 and 333-82230.


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

April 17, 2002
New York, New York
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DARIAN M. WRIGHT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4939 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed June 27, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
§ 31.25 Factor of safety. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the factor of safety is 1.5.
( b ) A factor of safety of at least five must be used in envelope design. A reduced factor of safety of at least two may be used if it is shown that the selected factor will preclude failure due to creep or instantaneous rupture from lack of rip stoppers. The selected factor must be applied to the more critical of the maximum operating pressure or envelope stress.
( c ) A factor of safety of at least five must be used in the design of all fibrous or non-metallic parts of the rigging and related attachments of the envelope to basket, trapeze, or other means provided for carrying occupants. The primary attachments of the envelope to the basket, trapeze, or other means provided for carrying occupants must be designed so that failure is extremely remote or so that any single failure will not jeopardize safety of flight.
( d ) In applying factors of safety, the effect of temperature, and other operating characteristics, or both, that may affect strength of the balloon must be accounted for.
( e ) For design purposes, an occupant weight of at least 170 pounds must be assumed.
[Doc. No. 1437, 29 FR 8258, July 1, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 31-2, 30 FR 3377, Mar. 13, 1965]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 89 (Monday, May 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER000-1770-000]


Conectiv Energy Supply, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 2, 2000.
    On March 1, 2000, Conectiv, on behalf of its affiliates, Conectiv 
Delmarva Generation, LLC (CDG) and Conective Atlantic Generation, LLC 
(CAG) filed under section 205 of the Federal Power Act proposed market-
based rates tariffs. In its filing, Conectiv also requested certain 
waivers and authorizations for CDG and CAG. In particular, Conectiv 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities 
by CDG and CAG. On April 25, 2000, the Commission issued an Order 
Accepting For Filing Proposed Service Agreements And Market-Based Rates 
(Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's April 25, 2000 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (C), (D), and (F):
    (C) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by CDG or CAG 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (D) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (C) above, CDG and CAG are hereby authorized to 
issue securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of CDG and CAG compatible with the 
public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (F) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of CDG's 
and CAG's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 25, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Borgers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11351 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 399
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 399 appear at 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 399.2 Exclusions. The following types of policies are generally not included in this part: ( a ) Policies relating solely to the internal management of the Department;
( b ) Policies requiring secrecy in the public interest or in the interest of national defense;
( c ) Policies that are repetitive of 49 U.S.C. 40101;
( d ) Policies that are fully expressed in a procedural or substantive rule of the Department, or in any opinion, decision, order, certificate, permit, exemption, or waiver of the Department;
( e ) Expressions of encouragement or admonition to industry to follow a certain course of action;
( f ) Positions on legislative items and on other matters that are outside the scope of the Department's current statutory powers and duties.
[PS-21, 29 FR 1446, Jan. 29, 1964, as amended by PS-63, 40 FR 6643, Feb. 13, 1975, Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019]
#### § 381.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is ensure that air travelers who have purchased tours to special events will receive the promised admission to the event. This part expands the “Super Bowl rule” to other events.
#### § 35.13 [Reserved]
#### § 375.30 Operations other than commercial air operations.

Foreign civil aircraft that are not engaged in commercial air operations into, out of, or within the United States may be operated in the United States and may carry non-revenue traffic to, from or between points in the United States.
#### [611] Bixly *vs.*Mead.

Where property worth §1000 was struck off at a sheriff’s sale for a trifling sum, and it was shown that the plaintiff in the execution had been disappointed in the attendance of an agent, and that the defendant was *insolvent,*the sale was set aside and a re-sale ordered.

In this case property worth $1000 was bid in at a sheriff’s sale by a relative of the defendant, for the trifling sum of $26. The plaintiff applied to the court to set aside the sale and order a- re-sale. The plaintiff had employed an agent to attend the sale and bid in the property, but the agent had forgotten to attend. The defendant is insolvent. The motion was granted.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND , TEXAS JUDGMENT ON REMAND
Tory Levon Kirk
, * From the Criminal District Court No. 5 of Dallas County, Trial Court No. F

- 0962440

- L

.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 00130

- CR * September 24 , 2015

The State of Texas
, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposal and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel ``Telemedicin''.
    Date: January 18, 2000.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Richard C. Harrison, Chief, Contract Review 
Branch, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 
3158, MSC 9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, 301-435-1437.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS).

    Dated: January 11, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-1142 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### John O. Nelson, Appellant, *v.*Henry M. Cummings, Respondent.

(Submitted October 5, 1936;

decided October 6, 1936.)

*Thomas J. Gallagher*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 1998-C
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       of
                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

         The undersigned certifies that she is an Authorized Officer of
Wilmington Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner
Trustee for Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 1998-C and that she is duly
authorized to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Issuer in
connection with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer and Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of June 1,
1998 (the "Indenture"). All capitalized terms used herein without definition
shall have the respective meanings specified in the Indenture.

         The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of
the Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under her supervision
and, to the best of her knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has complied
with all conditions and convenants in all material respects under the Indenture
throughout the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this 25th
day of March, 2002.

                                    CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 1998-C
                                    BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
                                    individual capacity, but solely as Owner
                                    Trustee


                                    /s/ Denise Geran
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Name: Denise Geran
                                    Title: Senior Financial Services Officer

         Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Servicer, hereby
requests that Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee, execute the above
Issuer's Certificate and deliver it to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National
Association, as Indenture Trustee.


                                    CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer

                                    /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Richard J. Naeder
                                    Authorized Signatory
§ 25.677 Trim systems. ( a ) Trim controls must be designed to prevent inadvertent or abrupt operation and to operate in the plane, and with the sense of motion, of the airplane.
( b ) There must be means adjacent to the trim control to indicate the direction of the control movement relative to the airplane motion. In addition, there must be clearly visible means to indicate the position of the trim device with respect to the range of adjustment. The indicator must be clearly marked with the range within which it has been demonstrated that takeoff is safe for all center of gravity positions approved for takeoff.
( c ) Trim control systems must be designed to prevent creeping in flight. Trim tab controls must be irreversible unless the tab is appropriately balanced and shown to be free from flutter.
( d ) If an irreversible tab control system is used, the part from the tab to the attachment of the irreversible unit to the airplane structure must consist of a rigid connection.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5675, Apr. 8, 1970; Amdt. 25-115, 69 FR 40527, July 2, 2004]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP99-518-013]

Take notice that on May 1, 2000, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation (PG&E GT-NW) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets with an effective date of May 1, 2000:

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 7

Original Sheet No. 7.01

Original Sheet No. 7C

PG&E GT-NW states that these sheets are being filed to reflect the implementation of three negotiated rate agreements.

PG&E GT-NW further states that a copy of this filing has been served on PG&E GT-NW's jurisdictional customers, and interested state regulatory agencies.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11632  Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
10.6


 


CONSULTING AGREEMENT
ADDENDUM


 


This
Consulting Agreement Addendum is entered into effective as of March 6, 2003,
and is a supplement to, and modification of, that certain Consulting Agreement
(the “Original Agreement”) by and between F.Y.I. Incorporated (n/k/a SOURCECORP, Incorporated) (the “Company”)
and David Lowenstein (“Consultant”), dated as of January 1, 2000.


 


1.             Fee Modification.  Effective March 6, 2003, in addition to the fees contemplated
by Section 2 of the Original Agreement, Consultant shall be paid the lesser of
$140 per hour or $1000 per day, for services Consultant performs at the request
of, and on behalf of, the Company, subject to the aggregate compensation
limitation under the Original Agreement of $250,000 for any calendar year; provided,
that such fees shall not be available for SOURCECORP
Board of Director related activities or (preclosing) acquisition related
activities, which Board related activities are compensated for in accordance
with the then prevailing Board compensation structure and which (preclosing)
acquisition related activities are compensated for under Section 2 of the
Original Agreement.


 


2.             Governing Law.  This Addendum shall in all respects be
construed according to the laws of the State of Texas.


 


3.             Counterparts.  This Addendum may be executed simultaneously in two (2) or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which
together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.


 


4.             Effect of Addendum.  Except as specifically amended by this
Addendum, all provisions of the Original Agreement remain in full force and
effect in accordance with their express terms.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Addendum as of the day
and year first above written.


 


 


	
  SOURCECORP,  Incorporated

  	
   

  	
  CONSULTANT

  
	
  (f/k/a
  F.Y.I. Incorporated)

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Thomas C. Walker

  	
   

  	
  /s/ David Lowenstein

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Thomas C. Walker

  	
   

  	
  David Lowenstein

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Chairman and
Chief Development Officer
#### § 1261.604 Nonwaiver of rights by involuntary setoff.

The employee's involuntary payment of all or any portion of the debt, being collected under this subpart, must not be construed as a waiver of any rights which the employee may have under an existing written contract applicable to the specific debt or under any other pertinent statutory authority for the collection of claims of the United States or the agency.
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.416 Appearances by persons not parties.

With consent of the administrative law judge, appearances may be entered without request for or grant of permission to intervene by interested persons who are not parties to the proceeding. Such persons may, with the consent of the administrative law judge, cross-examine a particular witness or suggest to any party or counsel therefor questions or interrogations to be asked witnesses called by any party, but may not otherwise examine witnesses and may not introduce evidence or otherwise participate in the proceeding. However, such persons may present to both the administrative law judge and the DOT decisionmaker an oral or written statement of their position on the issues involved in the proceeding.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
  Digital
    River, Inc.
  Computation
    of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
  Years Ended December 31,2003


2004


2005


2006


2007Income from operations

$
16,298


$
34,762


$
66,713


$
67,595


$
73,914Add: Fixed charges


235



2,094



3,092



3,240



3,331Earnings as defined


16,533



36,856



69,805



70,835



77,245Fixed charges

$
235


$
2,094


$
3,092


$
3,240


$
3,331Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1)


70.4



17.6



22.6



21.9



23.2     (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing
    income (loss) from operations plus fixed charges by fixed
    charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization
    of debt issuance costs and that portion of rental payments under
    operating leases that we believe to be representative of
    interest.
Exhibit 24.5


                               KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



     WHEREAS,  KeySpan  Corporation,  a New York  corporation  (the  "Company"),
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K as prescribed by
said Commission  pursuant to said Act and the rules and regulations  promulgated
thereunder.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in my capacity as a director of the Company,  I do hereby
appoint GERALD LUTERMAN, JOHN J. BISHAR, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and each of
them  severally,  as my  attorneys-in-fact  with power to execute in my name and
place, and in my capacity as a director of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any
amendment  to said  Report  and  any  other  documents  required  in  connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney
this 24th day of February, 2005.



                                                     /s/James L. Larocca