alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-4036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus LINDELL ROY HUTCHINSON, a/k/a Star, a/k/a Starsky, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00015-HCM) Submitted: September 7, 2007 Decided: September 19, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jennifer T. Stanton, J.T. STANTON, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Richard Cooke, Howard J. Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorneys, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Lindell Roy Hutchinson seeks to appeal his 168-month sentence following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute and to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute. The government has moved to dismiss the appeal. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court entered judgment on June 21, 2005. The notice of appeal was filed on December 21, 2005. *Because Hutchinson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we grant the government’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal. United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 224 (1960) (holding that timely filing of notice of appeal is “mandatory and jurisdictional”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately- 3 - presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
## December 13, 2010

Dennis J. DeVany Office of Aviation Analysis US Department of Transportation 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington , D.C . 20590

SkyWest Airlines Essential Air Servi ce Proposal for Grand Island, Nebraska

.

Dear Mr. DeVany:

Attached is the SkyWest Airlines pr oposal for continued service to Grand Island,
Nebraska. Our proposal is to provide two direct round trips daily (1 2 round trips per week) to Chicago, Illinois ( ORD ) with no intermediate stops or aircraft flow from other cities. Service will be provided with the Bombardier Canadair Regional Jet 200 (CRJ200 ) 5 0

- seat turbojet aircraft. The proposal period is for May 1 , 2011 to April 30,
2013

.

These flights will be operated as United Express, pursuant to a code

- sharing agreement
with United Airlines , and will provid e connections in Chicago to the national

t ransportation system

.

SkyWest welcomes the opportunity to provide reliable service if selected.

Thank you for yo ur consideration.

Sincer ely,

Michael Thompson
Vice President

– Market Development SkyWest AirlinesSkyWest Airlines Grand Island, NE 2011-2012

14-Dec-10

GRI

ORD

Number of round-trips per week 12

Aircraft Type - CRJ 200

Passenger Revenue Passengers 21,000 Average Fare 115.00 $

Revenue 2,415,000 $

Block Time Trip block time - Minutes 105
Total scheduled block time 2,184 Total completed block time 98% 2,140

RPMS Passengers 21,000 Stage Length 543
11,403,000

ASMs Scheduled Departures 1,248 Competed Departures 98% 1,223 Stage length 543
Available Seats 50
33,883,200

Revenue 2,415,000 $

Direct Operating Expenses Blk Hr 1,946.24 $ 4,165,576 $ Flight attendant Blk Hr 37.30 $ 79,834 $

RPM related RPMS 0.003 $ 34,209 $ Departure related Departures 412.56 $ 504,577 $

ASM related ASMS 0.011 $ 372,715 $

5,156,912 $

Operating income (loss) (2,741,912) $

5% profit margin 257,846 $

Subsidy requirement 2,999,758 $

SkyWest effective rates per unit Per trip 4,216 $
Per passenger 246 $ SkyWest cost per block hour 2,409 $

Effective Subsidy rate per unit Per trip 2,453 $
Per passenger 143 $ SkyWest cost per block hour 2,409 $

Load factor 34% Average fuel cost per gallon 2.75 $
§ 406.179 Judicial review of a final decision and order. ( a ) A person may seek judicial review of a final decision and order of the FAA decisionmaker as provided in 5 U.S.C. chapter 7 and 28 U.S.C. 1331. A party seeking judicial review must file with a United States district court.
( b ) In accordance with § 406.9(e)(iv), if a person seeks judicial review not later than 60 days after the final decision and order has been served on the respondent, the final decision and order is stayed.
( c ) In accordance with § 406.9(i), if a respondent does not pay a civil penalty and does not file an appeal with the United States district court within 60 days after service of the final decision and order, the FAA may refer the order to the United States Department of Treasury or Department of Justice to collect the civil penalty.
#### § 437.37 Tracking.

An applicant must identify and describe each method or system used to meet the tracking requirements of § 437.67.
§ 382.121 What mobility aids and other assistive devices may passengers with a disability bring into the aircraft cabin? ( a ) As a carrier, you must permit passengers with a disability to bring the following kinds of items into the aircraft cabin, provided that they can be stowed in designated priority storage areas or in overhead compartments or under seats, consistent with FAA, PHMSA, TSA, or applicable foreign government requirements concerning security, safety, and hazardous materials with respect to the stowage of carry-on items. ( 1 ) Manual wheelchairs, including folding or collapsible wheelchairs;
( 2 ) Other mobility aids, such as canes (including those used by persons with impaired vision), crutches, and walkers; and
( 3 ) Other assistive devices for stowage or use within the cabin (*e.g.,* prescription medications and any medical devices needed to administer them such as syringes or auto-injectors, vision-enhancing devices, and POCs, ventilators and respirators that use non-spillable batteries, as long as they comply with applicable safety, security and hazardous materials rules).
( b ) In implementing your carry-on baggage policies, you must not count assistive devices (including the kinds of items listed in paragraph (a) of this section) toward a limit on carry-on baggage.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jermiah Joseph Delao, * From the 70th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. A-20-0904-CR.

Vs. No. 11-24-00055-CR * April 11, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
---

KPMG LLP
    Telephone
    (514) 840-2100Chartered Accountants
    Fax
    (514) 840-2187600 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West
    Internet
    www.kpmg.caSuite 1500Montréal Québec H3A 0A3


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors Gildan Activewear Inc.

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F
of:

- our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated November
  30, 2011 on the consolidated balance sheets as at October 2, 2011 and October
  3, 2010 and the consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income,
  shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
  period ended October 2, 2011;
- our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
  Reconciliation to United States GAAP dated November 30, 2011 on the Companys
  supplementary information entitled Reconciliation to United States GAAP
- our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated November
  30, 2011 on the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
  October 2, 2011;

each of which is contained in this annual report on Form 40-F
of Gildan Activewear Inc. for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2011.

Chartered Accountants

December 9, 2011 Montréal, Canada

KPMG LLP is a Canadian
limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG networkof independent member firms affiliated with KPMG
International, a Swiss cooperative.KPMG Canada provides
services to KPMG LLP.

---
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-0914; Dir ID 2010-NM-166-AD
#### THOMAS v. BLAYLOCK et al.

No. 29212.

May 7, 1940.

*102 P. 2d 585.*

James W. Rodgers, of Holdenville, and C. M. Gordon, of Okmulgee, for plaintiff in error.

C. H. Baskin, of Holdenville, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves the same questions of law and fact which were involved and decided in Thomas v. Belcher, 184 Okla. 410, 87 P. 2d 1084. The parties by stipulation have filed the briefs which were used in said cause as the briefs in the case at bar. What we have heretofore said in the above case is controlling upon every issue involved here. The judgment of the trial court in favor of defendants B. E Anderson, Oscar Swain, A. T. Sanders, and R. F. Eastep is unsupported by any competent evidence shown in the record and is contrary to law as announced in the above-cited decision of this court. It is therefore unnecessary to repeat what we have heretofore said or to elaborate upon the matter further.

The judgment as to the above-named defendants is accordingly reversed, with directions to the trial court to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against said defendants and each of them.

BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, HURST, and DANNER, JJ., concur.
180919 EXT ORD RE FINCA MATILDE LIFT STAY VERSION SEPTEMBER 19, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3567-LTS

PUERTO RICO HIGHWAYS AND (Jointly Administered)

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Debtors.

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER GRANTING URGENT CONSENTED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES

The Court has received and reviewed the Urgent Consented Motion for Extension 

of Deadlines (Docket Entry No. 3944 in Case No. 17-3283 and Docket Entry No. 509 in Case 

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) 

Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 

BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) (Title III case numbers are listed 

as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3946 Filed:09/19/18 Entered:09/19/18 10:08:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
180919 EXT ORD RE FINCA MATILDE LIFT STAY VERSION SEPTEMBER 19, 2018 2

No. 17-3567, the “Motion”). The Motion is granted to the extent provided herein. Opposition 

papers to the Lift Stay Notice (Docket Entry No. 3851 in Case No. 17-3283, the “Lift Stay 

Motion”) must be filed by September 27, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). Reply 

papers must be filed by October 4, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). The request 

for an extension of the briefing schedule is deemed to be consent to an extension of the period 

referenced in 11 U.S.C. § 362(e)(1) pending the Court’s determination of the Lift Stay Motion.

This Order resolves Docket Entry No. 3944 in Case No. 17-3283 and Docket 

Entry No. 509 in Case No. 17-3567.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 19, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3946 Filed:09/19/18 Entered:09/19/18 10:08:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 24.2

            RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the Corporation be, and hereby
      are, and each of them with the full  authority  without the others  hereby
      is, authorized,  empowered and directed,  in the name and on behalf of the
      Corporation,  to execute  the  Corporation's  Form 10-K for the year ended
      December  31,  1998,  in a form  substantially  similar  to the form to be
      provided to the Directors of the Corporation  for their review,  with such
      changes  as such  proper  officers,  with the  advice  of  counsel  deemed
      necessary  or  desirable,  the  execution  by such  proper  officers to be
      conclusive  evidence  that  they  or  he/she  deemed  such  changes  to be
      necessary or desirable, and to execute any amendment to such Form 10-K, to
      procure all necessary  signatures thereon,  and to file such Form 10-K and
      any  amendment  when  so  executed  (together  with  appropriate  exhibits
      thereto) with the Securities Exchange Commission.

            RESOLVED,   that  the  proper  officers  of  the  Corporation   are,
      authorized,  empowered  and  directed  in the  name and on  behalf  of the
      Corporation   to  execute  and   deliver  any  and  all  such   documents,
      certificates, instruments, agreements, or regulatory filing, including any
      amendments,  modifications,  or supplements  thereto, and to take all such
      further action as any such officer or other such  authorized  person deems
      necessary,  proper,  convenient,  or  desirable  in order to carry out the
      foregoing  resolutions and to effectuate the purposes and intents thereof,
      the taking of any such action to be  conclusive  evidence of the  approval
      thereof by the directors of the Corporation, and

            RESOLVED,  that all  actions  previously  taken  and all  documents,
      instruments, certificates and the like previously executed by directors or
      officers of the Corporation or other authorized persons in connection with
      the matters  referred to in the foregoing  resolutions be hereby approved,
      ratified and confirmed in all respects.

      I, R.R. Wieczorek, Vice President, Secretary & Treasurer of KeySpan Energy
DO HEREBY  CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of  resolutions
duly  adopted by the Board of Directors  of said  Corporation  at a meeting duly
called and held  February  25,  1999,  at which a quorum was  present and voting
throughout,  and that such  resolutions are in full force and effect on the date
of this certification.

      WITNESS my hand and seal of the corporation this 25th day of March, 1999.

                                /s/ RR Wieczorek

                                [Corporate Seal]
From: Angel E. Rotger-Sabat <arotger@scvrlaw.com> 

Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 9:32 AM

To: hermann.bauer@oneillborges.com; ubaldo.fernandez@oneillborges.com; dperez@omm.com; 

lmarini@mpmlawpr.com; cvelaz@mpmlawpr.com

Cc: Ramon Coto-Ojeda <rco@crlawpr.com>; Wanda Mossetty <wmm@crlawpr.com>; Lcdo. William 

Maisonet Rodriguez <bufetemaisonet@yahoo.com>; Yoshira Montes <ymontes@scvrlaw.com> 

Subject: The Financial Oversight and Management Board for PR - Lift Stay Notice for Case NO. 13-1360 

// O/File no. 608-1 

Greetings:

As you know, counsel Ramón Coto-Ojeda, and I represent the interests of our client, Robert A. 

Díaz-Morales, in the matter of Case No. 13-1360 (ADC), Robert Anel Diaz-Morales v. Limaris CruzVélez, et al. This action was stayed under the Commonwealth’s PROMESA case. 

We write to you because we still have not received a response to our May 5,2023-letter giving 

you notice of our client’s intent to file a Motion for Relief from Stay. We wish to reach an 

agreement in the manner of some sort of monetary compensation for our client before having 

to file the Motion for Relief from Stay pursuant to the latest Amended Case Management 

Procedure Order in the matter of Case no. 17-03283 (LTS), In re the Financial Oversight and 

Management Board for Puerto Rico as representative of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. 

Attached is the Lift Stay Notice sent on May 5, 2023, for ease of reference. 

Therefore, we ask you to meet and confer with us in order to try to reach an agreement.

Please, let us know your availability.

Truly, 

Angel E. Rotger Sabat, Esq. 

Saldaña, Carvajal & Vélez-Rivé, PSC

166 Ave. de la Constitución

San Juan, PR 00901

Tel. (787) 289-9250

Fax. (787) 289-9253 

Cel. (787) 402-5670

e-mail: arotger@scvrlaw.com

http://www.scvrlaw.com

Exhibit 2 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24878-2 Filed:08/14/23 Entered:08/14/23 11:05:59 Desc:

Exhibit Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 2
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This communication contains information belonging to Saldaña, 

Carvajal & Vélez-Rivé, P.S.C., which is confidential and/or legally privileged. The information is 

intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, 

you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance 

on the contents of said information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by 

error, please notify us immediately.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24878-2 Filed:08/14/23 Entered:08/14/23 11:05:59 Desc:

Exhibit Exhibit 2 Page 2 of 2
#### LONG v. BALTIMORE BARGAIN HOUSE.

(Decided December 14, 1915.)

Appeal from Walker Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. T. L. Sowell.

No counsel marked for appellant. Dana Phillips, for appellee.

Pelham, P. *J.*

Affirmed for failure to file certificate of appeal in time.
# NationalArchives andRecords Administration

~--------------------------------------



# Office oftheFederal Register
MI,P 23 

## 2007 Ms. Nancy Molitor Regulations Division (AGe-200) Office ofthe Chief Counsel Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 800Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Dear Ms. Molitor: 

### The material1istcd in the attachment is approved forincorporation by reference m 14CFR Part 39_ This approval is contingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by our staffs. The approval to incorporate 

### byreference this publication(s) is effective on the effective date of your final rule. 

### Ifyou wish to enforce some other edition of the publication(s) approved, you must: 

### 1. Publish notice ofthe change inthe Federal Register, and amend the Code of Federal Regulations; and 2. Ensure that a copy of that edition is on file at the Office of the Federal Register; and 3. Notify me In writing of the change. 

### Smcerely, 

## ,iIJM<tv.1

# i,.1AJr,;.t:: fr-- RAYMOND A, MOSLEY Director of the Federal Register Federal Register Attorney: ~ 

### Attachment

US mail address: 8601 Adelphi ROild,College Park, MD 2071()-f,001

Office location: 800Norlh Capitol Street, N'IV, Suite 700,Washington, DC 20002--'1244 Federal Register web sites: htlp:/ Iww\\'.archi,'esgov jfedcraJ-register IIndhttp:! I'V\VIV.gpOClccess.gov Inara

### Incorporation by

### Referellce Docket No. FAA-2004-19755: Directorate Tdentifier 2004-NM-23-AD,- Amdt. 39-15003; AD 2007-07-03
Boeing Service Bulletin 747- Revision 4- 21A2418 dated November 17, 2005 

### f)ocket No. FAA-l006-25336: Direclorate Idelllifier 2006-NM-070-AD; Amdl. 39-15002: AD 2007-07-02
Boeing Special Attention Service Bullelin 737-25- 1545 dated September 8, 2005 Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-25- 1548 dated November 22,2005 Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-25- 0284 dated November 22. 2005
dated November 22. 2005 Special AttentiOll Service Bulletin 757-25- 0285 

### Docket No. P:4A-2006-26250; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-I04-AD; Amdl. 39-15001 ..AD 2007-07-01 Boeing

Airbus Service Bulletin A3OO27-6057, exduding Appendix 1 dated May 17, 2005

Prillled 3/2212007 Pagelofl
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              85
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          82,407
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        183,383
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 263,340
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                917
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         14
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     262,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 263,340
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,101
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,707
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,808
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,808
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,719
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,624
<EPS-BASIC>                                    146,240
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  146,240
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.43
<LOANS-NON>                                        316
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,855
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      275
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,795
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,795
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>