alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# HUALAPAI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES p
.0

. BOX 300 e PEACH SPRINGS. ARIZONA 86434 e 520769-2254 e 520769·2255 e FAX 520769·2309 December 4, 2013 Mr. Eugene Bromley U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CWA Standards and Permits Office (WTR-5) 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA. 94105
Dear Mr. Bromley: In response to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) request for certification of Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) containing a proposed NPDES general permit for storm water discharges from industrial facilities in geographic areas where EPA is the permitting authority including four states, Indian country lands in various states and the U.S. Pacific Island territories. The Hualapai Tribe reserves all rights and obligations stemming from tribal sovereignty and Treatment as a State underthe Clean WaterAct. The Tribe finds the permitto be consistent with theTribes water quality standards set forth in the Hualapai Environmental Review Code, Subtitle I. Water Resources and Wetlands, Part 1. Water Resources Ordinance and 401 certification are hereby given

. In the future thetribe requests all notices of intentfor proposed storm water discharges underthe MSGP and all pollution prevention plans for storm water discharge on Hualapai Tribal landsshall be submitted tothe Water Resource Program through theTribal Chairwoman for review and approval, P.O. Box 179, Peach Springs, AZ 86434. Ifyou should have questions or need additional information please contact Alex Cabillo, Water Resources Program Manager at (928) 769-2254

. Sincerely, r........__

Alex Cabillo Hualapai Department of Natural Resources
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4273 

To amend the Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park Establishment Act of 2000 to provide for additional areas 

to be added to the park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2020 

Ms. HARRIS (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front 

National Historical Park Establishment Act of 2000 to 

provide for additional areas to be added to the park, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROSIE THE RIVETER/WORLD WAR II HOME 

4 FRONT NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ADDI5 TIONS. 

6 The Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front Na7 tional Historical Park Establishment Act of 2000 (16 

8 U.S.C. 410ggg, et seq.) is amended as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4273 IS

1 (1) In section 2(b), by adding at the end the 

2 following: ‘‘Not later than 180 days after areas are 

3 added to the park administratively or by Federal 

4 law, the Secretary shall update the map to include 

5 the added areas.’’. 

6 (2) By adding at the end of section 2, the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(c) ADDITIONAL AREAS INCLUDED.—In addition to 

9 areas included under subsection (b), the park shall include 

10 the following: 

11 ‘‘(1) The Nystrom Elementary School–The 

12 Maritime Building, as listed on the National Reg13 ister of Historic Places. 

14 ‘‘(2) Such other areas as the Secretary deems 

15 appropriate.’’. 

16 (3) By amending section 3(e)(2) to read as fol17 lows: 

18 ‘‘(2) OTHER PROPERTY.—Within the bound19 aries of the park, the Secretary may acquire lands, 

20 improvements, waters, or interests therein, by dona21 tion, purchase, exchange or transfer. Any lands, or 

22 interests therein, owned by the State of California or 

23 any political subdivision thereof, may be acquired 

24 only by donation. When any tract of land is only 

25 partly within such boundaries, the Secretary may acVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:33 Aug 05, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4273.IS S4273

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4273 IS

1 quire all or any portion of the land outside of such 

2 boundaries in order to minimize the payment of sev3 erance costs. Land so acquired outside of the bound4 aries may be exchanged by the Secretary for non5 Federal lands within the boundaries. Any portion of 

6 land acquired outside the boundaries and not used 

7 for exchange shall be reported to the General Serv8 ices Administration for disposal for not less than 

9 fair market value under chapter 1 of title 40, United 

10 States Code.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 29.997 Fuel strainer or filter. There must be a fuel strainer or filter between the fuel tank outlet and the inlet of the first fuel system component which is susceptible to fuel contamination, including but not limited to the fuel metering device or an engine positive displacement pump, whichever is nearer the fuel tank outlet. This fuel strainer or filter must— ( a ) Be accessible for draining and cleaning and must incorporate a screen or element which is easily removable;
( b ) Have a sediment trap and drain, except that it need not have a drain if the strainer or filter is easily removable for drain purposes;
( c ) Be mounted so that its weight is not supported by the connecting lines or by the inlet or outlet connections of the strainer or filter inself, unless adequate strengh margins under all loading conditions are provided in the lines and connections; and
( d ) Provide a means to remove from the fuel any contaminant which would jeopardize the flow of fuel through rotorcraft or engine fuel system components required for proper rotorcraft or engine fuel system operation.
[Amdt. 29-10, 39 FR 35462, Oct. 1, 1974, as amended by Amdt. 29-22, 49 FR 6850, Feb. 23, 1984; Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34217, Sept. 2, 1988]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4162 

To provide certainty for airport funding. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 2, 2020 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. CRUZ, and Ms. DUCKWORTH) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To provide certainty for airport funding. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Airport Infrastructure 

5 Readiness Act of 2020’’ or the ‘‘AIR Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPORTION7 MENTS TO PRIMARY AIRPORTS. 

8 Section 47114(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 

9 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(J) SPECIAL RULE FOR FISCAL YEARS

11 2022 AND 2023.—Notwithstanding subparagraph 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4162 IS

1 (A) and the absence of scheduled passenger air2 craft service at an airport, the Secretary shall 

3 apportion in fiscal years 2022 and 2023 to the 

4 sponsor of the airport an amount based on the 

5 number of passenger boardings at the airport 

6 during whichever of the following years that 

7 would result in the highest apportioned amount: 

8 ‘‘(i) Calendar year 2018. 

9 ‘‘(ii) Calendar year 2019. 

10 ‘‘(iii) The prior full calendar year 

11 prior to the current fiscal year.’’. 

12 SEC. 3. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL CONTRACT PROGRAM. 

13 Notwithstanding section 47124(d)(1)(B) of title 49, 

14 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation shall 

15 not calculate a benefit-to-cost ratio with respect to an air 

16 traffic control tower participating in the Contract Tower 

17 Program on the basis of an annual aircraft traffic de18 crease in fiscal years 2020 and 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
§ 382.45 Must carriers make copies of this Part available to passengers? ( a ) As a carrier, you must keep a current copy of this part at each airport you serve. As a foreign carrier, you must keep a copy of this part at each airport serving a flight you operate that begins or ends at a U.S. airport. You must make this copy available for review by any member of the public on request.
( b ) If you have a Web site, it must provide notice to consumers that they can obtain a copy of this part in an accessible format from the Department of Transportation by any of the following means: ( 1 ) For calls made from within the United States, by telephone via the Toll-Free Hotline for Air Travelers with Disabilities at 1-800-778-4838 (voice) or 1-800-455-9880 (TTY),
( 2 ) By telephone to the Aviation Consumer Protection Division at 202-366-2220 (voice) or 202-366-0511 (TTY),
( 3 ) By mail to the Air Consumer Protection Division, C-75, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., West Building, Room W96-432, Washington, DC 20590, and
( 4 ) On the Aviation Consumer Protection Division's Web site (*http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov*).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41470

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

RICHARD GARZA, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:16-CR-179-1 

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Richard Garza has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Garza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fif h Circuit

FILED

August 22, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41470 Document: 00514126916 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/22/2017
No. 16-41470

2 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-41470 Document: 00514126916 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/22/2017
Proposed Rule: Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule: 2015Revisions and Confidentiality Determinations for Petroleumand Natural Gas SystemsMeeting DocumentationDate Staff Contact Information(Name, email, phone #)Name of Organization(Attach list of allattendees names andemails if possible)Summary of Discussion(e.g., applicability,reporting requirements,etc.)WrittenCommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit toDocket?Date sent toEPA- CCD8/13/15Alexis McKittrick,mckittrick.alexis@epa.gov,202-343-9153Other EPA attendees:Sean HoganMark de FigueiredoRagan TateKarin Ritter, API,Ritterk@api.orgJesse Sandlin, DevonAdam Pacsi, ChevronRoger Martella, SidleyGrover Campbell, DevonTerri Shires, AECOMZack Schaffer,ChesapeakeJoel Visser, SidleyAlma Cedeno,ConocoPhillipsMegan Eastment, EncanaReid Smith, BPJill Cooper, AnadarkoBrad Morello, ShellGreg Johnston,Chesapeake-Completions andworkovers of oil wellswith hydraulicfracturing-Well identificationnumbersNoneprovided;submittedcomments tothe docket onthe ruleN/A
#### [510] Cross *vs.*Franklin.

The rule to transcribe the record, where a writ of error is sued out, returnable in this court, must be entered in the court from whence the judgment is sought to be removed; it cannot be entered here until the writ of error is returned.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Alton L. Boynton, certify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2007          By: /s/ Alton L. Boynton         Alton L. Boynton    President and Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 435.31 General.

The FAA conducts a safety review to determine whether an applicant is capable of reentering a reentry vehicle and payload, if any, to a designated reentry site without jeopardizing public health and safety and the safety of property. A safety approval is part of the licensing record on which the licensing determination is based.
#### § 305.9 Rights of witnesses.

Any person required to testify or to submit documentary evidence shall be entitled to procure, on payment of lawfully prescribed costs, a copy of any document produced by such person and of his or her own testimony as stenographically reported. Any person compelled to testify or to produce documentary evidence may be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01061**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** 

### x 01061\01061_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01061\01061_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### x 01061\01061_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01061\01061_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01061\01061_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01061\01061_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01061\01061_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01061\Certification Statement Plant ID_01061.PDF Plant certification statement 

### x 01061\Supporting Documentation\Stockton Supplemental Information.PDF Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
#### CAIN v. THE STATE.

(Decided February 1, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. H. P. Heflin.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Thomas, J.

No error of record, no bill of exceptions. Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32(a)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|  
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.

|              |  |                                                                               
|------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|June 30, 2005 |  | /s/ J. T. Battenberg III                                                      
|              |  |                                                                               
|              |  | J. T. Battenberg III
    Chairman of the Board and
    Chief Executive Officer
#### Benedict & Rody *vs.*Jones.

On a *special motion,*a party is not entitled to charge for a copy of *pleadings,*or of a *case*or *bill of exceptions*incorporated into the papers used on the motion, unless good cause exist for using *copies*instead of the *originals.*

A motion was made in this case for the re-taxation of a bill of costs. The grounds of the motion sufficiently appear in the opinion delivered.

*By the Court,*

Bronson, J.

The charges in the taxed bill of costs for copies of a *case*and *bill of exceptions*used on a special motion, should be stricken out. The case and bill of exceptions were not necessary papers on *the*motion then before the court; and had it been otherwise, the *originals*(or copies in’possession of the party for other purposes) might have been produced. The practice of swelling a bill of costs by charging for *copies*of *the pleadings*and other *proceedings*in the cause, to be used on a special motion, is wholly unwarrantable; and such items should be rejected by the taxing officer, unless he is satisfied that there was good cause for preparing copies, instead of using the originals or copies already in possession of the party. Although the copies were in this instance prepared in good faith and without any view to the question of costs, the charges should not have been allowed, and a re-taxation ordered.
§ 16.301 Prohibited ex parte communications. ( a ) The prohibitions of this section shall apply from the time a proceeding is noticed for hearing unless the person responsible for the communication has knowledge that it will be noticed, in which case the prohibitions shall apply at the time of the acquisition of such knowledge.
( b ) Except to the extent required for the disposition of ex parte matters as authorized by law: ( 1 ) No interested person outside the FAA and no FAA employee participating as a party shall make or knowingly cause to be made to any decisional employee an ex parte communication relevant to the merits of the proceeding;
( 2 ) No FAA employee shall make or knowingly cause to be made to any interested person outside the FAA an ex parte communication relevant to the merits of the proceeding; or
( 3 ) Ex parte communications regarding solely matters of agency procedure or practice are not prohibited by this section.
[Doc. No. 27783, 61 FR 54004, Oct. 16, 1996. Redesignated at Amdt. 16-1, 78 FR 56148, Sept. 12, 2013]
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:







(1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74398) of The Knot, Inc.,




(2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96179) of The Knot, Inc.,




(3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41960) of The Knot, Inc.,




(4) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-113824) of The Knot, Inc.,




(5) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-111060) of The Knot, Inc.,




(6) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-124177) of The Knot, Inc.,




(7) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141275) of The Knot, Inc.,




(8) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-159455) of The Knot, Inc.,




(9) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-165461) of The Knot, Inc.,




(10) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-135878) of The Knot, Inc. and




(11) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-135877) of The Knot, Inc.




of our reports dated March 16, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Knot, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of The Knot, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.







/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York




March 16, 2011
Editorial Note on Part 183
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 183.43 Application. An application for an ODA may be submitted after November 14, 2006. An application for an ODA must be submitted in a form and manner prescribed by the Administrator and must include the following: ( a ) A description of the functions for which authorization is requested.
( b ) A description of how the applicant satisfies the requirements of § 183.47 of this part;
( c ) A description of the applicant's organizational structure, including a description of the proposed ODA Unit as it relates to the applicant's organizational structure; and
( d ) A proposed procedures manual as described in § 183.53 of this part.
#### [528] Little *vs.*Kellogg.

A practising attorney of this court proceeded against as a defendant by the filing and service of a declaration, is not entitled to be served with *notice*of the subsequent proceedings in the suit, unless he has apprised the plaintiff’s attorney of his intention to *.defend in person.*

The suit in this case was .commenced by the filing and service of a declaration. The default of the defendant was entered for not pleading, the damages assessed, judgment signed, and execution issued. The defendant moved to set aside the proceedings subsequent to the default on an affidavit that he was a practising attorney of this court, and that no *notice of*assessment or inquiry had been served upon him ; he also made an affidavit of merits. In support of the motion to set aside the proceedings on the ground of irregularity, the case of *The New York State Bank*v. *Wood,*(10 *Wendell,*594,) was cited.

*By the Court,*

Nelson, J.

Where a suit is commenced against an attorney qf this court by the filing and service of a declaration, he is not entitled to be served with notices of the subsequent proceedings in the cause, unless he has given notice to the plaintiff’s attorney of an intention on his part to *defend in person.*Such I hold to be a sound construction of the *tenth*general rule of this court, and the motion to set aside the proceedings for irregularity is accordingly denied, notwith standing the decision in *The New York State Bank*v. *Wood,*(10 *Wendell,*594.) As, however, the defendant swears to merits, he is entitled to *relief;*and is accordingly allowed to come in- and defend. The judgment and execution to stand as surety, and the costs of this motion to abide the event of the suit.