alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
13316

#### MURCHISON NATIONAL BANK v. HAMER *ET AL.*

(161 S. E., *877)*

*52
      *Messrs. Samuel Want*and *Melvin*Hyman, for appellant,

*Mr. Preston B.*Thames, for respondent,

January 5, 1932.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChtEE Justice Brease.

While this cause is an action at law, the parties consented, as they had the legal right to do, for a trial, both as to the law and facts, by the Circuit Judge, with reference first to the Master.

Since the cause is at law, we are bound by the findings of fact of the Circuit Judge, if there was any competent and relevant evidence to support his findings.

The Circuit Judge, disregarding any incompetent evidence which may have been introduced before the Master, has found that there was sufficient competent *53evidence to show that the respondent, Mrs. Hamer, was indorser, and not a maker, of the promissory note, the subject of the action. We think he was entirely correct, for the letter referred to in the Master’s report, written by the payee of the note, showed that it was the intention of all the parties that Mrs. Hamer was only to become indorser of her husband’s note.

There can be no doubt of the relevancy and competency of that letter as evidence. It clearly appears, too, that the indorser was not given the required notice as to the dishonor of the note, and that she did not waive the giving of such notice.

If the promissory note before maturity, for value, had passed into the hands of a third party, questions not involved here might be raised; but the action was between the original payee, since deceased, represented by his administrator, and the signers of the note.

The report of the Master and the decree of the Circuit Judge will be reported.

It is needless to refer to all the exceptions, but they have been considered and are overruled.

The decree of Judge Shipp, appealed from, is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Stabler, Carter and Bonham concur

Mr. Justice Cothran did not participate on account of illness.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00125

- CV

___________________________

Ori gin al Proceeding 481st District Court of Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 23

- 1609

- 481

Before Womack, Kerr, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### HTRV R ESORT 

### , LLC , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and the
response thereto and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly,

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied , a n d t he temporary stay of all trial
court proceeding s is lifted

.
Per Curiam

Delivered : May 2, 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000797662
<NAME>                        Biorelease Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1
<CURRENCY>                                         U.S.DOLLARS
                                                    
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,832
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      195
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,284
<PP&E>                                          80,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          290,382
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       102,867
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,041
<SALES>                                          1,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,606
<CGS>                                              177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (26,397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     154
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26,397)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Lawyers Mortgage Company. Louis H. Pink, Superintendent of Insurance, as Rehabilitator of Lawyers Mortgage Company, Appellant; Mortgage Commission of The State of New York et al., Respondents.

(Argued October 1, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*555
      *Irving H. Jurow, Jess H. Rosenberg*and *Walter B. Herendeen*for appellant.

*John J. Clarke, Maurice Finkelstein, Morris*Amcha*nitzky*and *Benjamin J. Rabin*for Mortgage Commission of State of New York, respondent.

*Frank W. Chambers*and *Frederick J. Wilkens*for certain certificate holders, respondents.

*Edward N. Perkins*for Frances B. Cox, respondent.

*Hyman W. Gamso*for Delancey Nicoll, Jr., as committee of William H. McGill, an incompetent, respondent.

*Timothy N. Pfeiffer, Sinclair Hamilton*and *Wilber Stammler*for Title Guarantee and Trust Company, *amicus curiae.*

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
#### Camille Geary, Respondent, *v.*John R. Geary, Appellant. Caruthers Ewing, as Receiver, Respondent.

Argued November 16, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*Carroll G. Walter*and *James Lee Kauffman*for appellant.

*Edward D. Bolton*for Caruthers Ewing, as receiver, respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the order is interlocutory. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
a)

ow

asp

(FARMING PON NO TH)

ton

1 9

UNITED STATES
CEP AMT MERT OF The INT RIOR
CEOLSRHCAL SURVEY
BB 4.30 XB 10.03 RB 12.10 tt ao | RB 11.07 RB 4.83
| 2
29 28 | BF 26 po) A 40
|
—_— —_ eas SS t
=r 7 ‘eae i) in —— = A
| kB 18.90
|
ao
2
33 34 3) 3 31
4
3 2 1 Ee Fy 2 10 9 8 5 3 ty
a8, RB 12.40 ‘we 16.36 me 41.49 RB 8.29 RB OLOL
5 u 12 6 |
|
|
5 4 1
6 La 13 8 7
7 15
RbB38 ee at get a ee 7 |
“RB OLL.72 13,55 1 5
| ‘RB OS. 31
4 2
|
8 9 |
| 12 3
{
!
|
|
|
Lo |
Cr | a
ie 5.10
|
Y
| =
| €
| ie
17 2
6
"y Ze
Rt 2.01
ee ‘mp 12.52 - | KB 0.86 :
1 i 4B 10.63 [3 ‘RB 3.81
I
|
| |
{
{
i
I
21 19 j at
3 |
RB 9.28
|
|
Rb 5.97 4 5 7 8
Fi KB 0.85 |
1 2
‘RB 7.94 RB 7.89
Za
2 3
RB 1.74
a
WY 7.58 RB 8.63 25 7 a
|
10°
RB 3.76 wi
% 6 7 12
Se —
7 6 5 4
BOLLA7 RB O2.44
8 Te ho
3 he uw 12
fe
14 15 16 2 a fis
KB 3.30
1
RH BST RB 17.60 2 4 3 4 ry
RB 6.91 RB O9L77 RB 2.73
6 4 6 | 4
| |
| |
TH
Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1963, Compiled in 1979
=a:
___ 5000 6000 7000 FEET
_ 1 KILOMETER
NEW MEXICO

COAL RESOURCE OCCURRENCE MAP OF THE FLORA VISTA QUADRANGLE,

SAN JUAN COUNTY, NEW MEXICO

BY
DAMES & MOORE
1979

OPEN .FILE_ REPORT 79-1116
PLATE 2 OF 8

EXPLANATION

The area covered by this quadrangle is
entirely within the KRCRA boundary.

Ws

COAL LAND - Land within the?
KRCRA boundary for which the Federal
Government not own the coal rights.

TOTAL RESERVE BASE (RB) OF FEDERAL COAL
PER SECTION - In millions of short

calculated for each section of Federal
following the guidelines given in U.
i

Geological Survey Bulletin 1450-1
convert short tons to metric tons, mult
short tons by 0.9072.

ac i 7

SECTION OF LAND - Showing lots and Yor"
numbers .

NOTE: BLM Coal Ownership Data current
as of October 18, 1977.

REFERENCE

U.S. Bureau of Mines and U.S. Geological
Survey, 1976, Coal resource classification
system of the U.S. Bureau of Mines and
U.S. Geological Survey: U.S. Geological
Survey Bulletin 1450-B, 7 p.

This map was prepared under contract to the U.S.
Geological Survey and has not been edited for
conformity with Geological Survey editorial stand-
ards. Opinions and conclusions expressed herein
do not necessarily represent those of the Geo-
logical Survey.

PLATE 2

BOUNDARY AND COAL

DATA MAP
Exhibit 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Robert Ellin, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report of Amalgamated Technologies, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the registrant and have:

      a)    designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed  under  my
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant  is made known to me,  particularly  during the period in
            which this report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the
            end of the period  covered by this report based on such  evaluation;
            and

      c)    disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation of internal control
      over  financial  reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit
      committee of the  registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing
      the equivalent functions):

      a)    all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.


Date: August 22, 2005


/s/ Robert Ellin
--------------------------
Robert Ellin
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 792.68 Use and collection of Social Security numbers.

The head of each NCUA Office shall take such measures as are necessary to ensure that employees authorized to collect information from individuals are advised that individuals may not be required without statutory or regulatory authorization to furnish Social Security numbers, and that individuals who are requested to provide Social Security numbers voluntarily must be advised that furnishing the number is not required and that no penalty or denial of benefits will flow from the refusal to provide it.
#### § 61.102 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes the requirements for the issuance of private pilot certificates and ratings, the conditions under which those certificates and ratings are necessary, and the general operating rules for persons who hold those certificates and ratings.
# EUR-Lex - 31995D0311 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995D0311

**95/311/EC: Commission Decision of 24 July 1995 amending Decision 95/173/EC laying down specific conditions for importing fishery and aquaculture products from Peru **

*
Official Journal L 186 , 05/08/1995 P. 0078 - 0080 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 24 July 1995 amending Decision 95/173/EC laying down specific conditions for importing fishery and aquaculture products from Peru (Text with EEA relevance) (95/311/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 (1), laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 11 (5) thereof,

Whereas the list of establishments and factory ships approved by Peru for importing fishery and aquaculture products into the Community has been drawn up in Commission Decision 95/173/EC (2); whereas this list may be amended following the communication of a new list by the competent authority in Peru;

Whereas the competent authority in Peru has communicated a new list adding 10 establishments and one factory ship;

Whereas it is necessary to amend the list of approved establishments and factory ships accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision have been drawn up in accordance with the procedure laid down by Commission Decision 90/13/EEC (3),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex B of Decision 95/173/EC is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 1995.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.

(2) OJ No L 116, 23. 5. 1995, p. 41.

(3) OJ No L 8, 11. 1. 1990, p. 70.

ANNEX

'ANNEX B

LIST OF APPROVED ESTABLISHMENTS AND FACTORY VESSELS

>TABLE>

>TABLE>
#### Cora B. Caudwell, Respondent *v.*Village of Hamburg, Appellant.

Argued December 2, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*477
      *R. Foster Piper*and *Thomas*Penney, *Jr.,*for appellant.

*Robert W. McNulty*for respondent.

Judgments modified in accordance with opinion in *Ferguson*v. *Village of Hamburg*(272 N. Y. 234) decided herewith, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)


Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting of the SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II in June and 
July 2000.
    A summary of the meeting may be obtained from: Ms. Coral M. 
Sweeney, SAMHSA, Division of Extramural Activities Policy and Review, 
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 17-89, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone: 
(301) 443-2998.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the individual 
named as Contact for the meeting listed below.
    The meeting will include the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual contract proposals. These discussions could reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals and 
confidential and financial information about an individual's proposal. 
The discussion may also reveal information about procurement activities 
exempt from disclosure by statute and trade secrets and commercial or 
financial information obtained from a person and privileged and 
confidential. Accordingly, the meeting is concerned with matters exempt 
from mandatory disclosure in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3),(4), and (6) and 
5 U.S.C. App. 2, Sec. 10(d).
    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II.
    Panel: Technical Assistance & Logistical Support 270-00-7077.
    Meeting Date: June 1-2, 2000.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, Maryland 
20814.
    Closed: June 1, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; June 2, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-
Adjournment.
    Contact: Ferdinand Hui, Room 17-89, Parklawn Building, Telephone: 
(301) 443-9919 and FAX (301) 443-1587.
    Panel: State Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Systems Technical Review 
Project 270-00-7069.
    Meeting Date: July 10-11, 2000.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, Maryland 
20814.
    Closed: July 10, 2000 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; July 11, 2000, 8:30 
a.m.-Adjournment.
    Contact: Ferdinand Hui, Parklawn Building, Room 17-89, Telephone: 
(301) 443-9919 and FAX: (301)443-1587.
    Panel: Indefinite Delivery & Indefinite Quantity, 277-00-6049.
    Meeting Date: June 19-23, 2000.
    Meeting Place: Bethesda Marriott, 51512 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20814.
    Closed: July 19-23, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Contact: Ferdinand Hui, Parklawn Building, Room 17-89, Telephone: 
(301) 443-9919 and FAZ (301) 443-1587.

    Dated: May 2, 2000.
Coral Sweeney,
Review Specialist, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 00-11534 Filed 5-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 21, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-359

Lower Tribunal No. 92-27566C

________________

Angelo Stripling,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles K. Johnson, Judge.

Angelo Stripling, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD, LAGOA and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.

Angelo Stripling appeals the trial court’s order denying his 3.850(b)(2) 

motion for post-conviction relief, arguing he is entitled to resentencing in
conformance with chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, which has been codified in

sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402, Florida Statutes. We reverse and

remand for resentencing.

Stripling was found guilty of first-degree murder following a jury trial and

in 1992 was sentenced to life in prison with a 25-year minimum mandatory.

Stripling was also found guilty of armed robbery for which he received a

consecutive life sentence with a 3-year minimum mandatory, and was found guilty

of shooting a deadly missile into a vehicle for which he received a concurrent 15-

year sentence.

Stripling appealed his convictions and sentence, and this Court affirmed on

February 15, 1995. See Stripling v. State, 664 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). 

Stripling now claims he should be resentenced because he was a juvenile at the

time he committed the crime. Based on our recent decision in Neely v. State, no.

3d14-1052 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov. 30, 2016), Stripling is entitled to judicial review of

his sentence.

We therefore reverse Stripling’s first-degree murder sentence and remand to

the trial court for resentencing under section 775.082(1)(b)(1), Florida Statutes

(2016), section 921.1401, Florida Statutes (2014), and section 921.1402, Florida

Statutes (2015).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

2
3
Wainwright

- De La Cruz1, S.E., J.Y. Takekawa1, A. Miles1, J.M. Eadie2, E.C.

Palm1, M.T. Wilson3

1USGS, WERC, San Francisco Bay Estuary Field Station, Vallejo, CA 94592 2UC Davis, Dept. Wildlife, Fish, & Cons. Bio., One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616

3UC Davi s, Dept. of Avian Science, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 susan_wainwright@usgs.gov

The Influence of Winter Habitat Use and Diet on Selenium Risks for Surf Scoters (Melanitta perspicillata) in the San Francisco Bay Estuary

The San Francisco Bay (SFB) estuary is a critical wintering area for nearly half of Pacific Flyway surf scoters (Melanitta perspicillata); a sea duck species that has declined as much as 60% in the past 30 to 50 years. Poor winter habitat quality may contribute to population decline by decreasing winter survival, compromising body condition, or causing cross

- seasonal effects on reproduction. Scoters wintering in SFB accumulate high concentrations of selenium (Se), resulting in oxidative stress and low body mass, and prompting human co nsumption advisories.

We studied SFB scoters to: 1) measure spatial and temporal variability of Se in scoter tissues; 2) examine how regional habitat use and diet influence Se concentrations; 3) evaluate the potential

for cross

- seasonal effects on reprod uction. During winters 2004

- 2006 we radio

- marked 160 scoters to examine site fidelity and foraging areas. We collected 159 scoters, preserved gastrointestinal tracts for diet analysis, and measured liver Se. We satellite marked 22 SFB

scoters to find them on breeding grounds in Canada. Liver Se ranged from 7.4 to 119 μg/g dw and was at concentrations associated with reproductive impairment (98% of scoters), sublethal effects (i.e. oxidative stress, 56%), and mortality in laboratory mallards (16%). Concentra tions were significantly higher throughout winter in San Pablo and Suisun Bays compared to the Central Bay (ANOVA: F2,154=35.18, P<0.001). The Se enriched invasive clam, Corbula amurensis, dominated diets in Suisun (100% occurrence) and San Pablo (52% occu rrence) through late winter. In contrast, Central Bay diets consisted of soft bodied prey items and the clam Venerupis philippinarum. Radiomarked scoters displayed high site fidelity and small kernel home ranges, providing evidence that Se was accumulated near s coter collection sites. Scoter use of San Pablo and Suisun Bays declined by 80% between November and March, and by late January most radio

- marked scoters had moved to the Central Bay where their Se exposure was lowered. Mean Se concentrations in eggs colle cted from SFB scoters was 1.71 ± 0.122 μg/g dw,

and below concentrations of concern for waterfowl.

CALFED Statement of Relevance: Our study elucidates the pathways and implications of selenium bioaccumulation in a declining Bay

- Delta species, and thus aid s in meeting Calfed objectives to manage, restore and protect native species.

SESSION: Species and Communities, 10/24/2008, 1:40 PM, Room 306
#### P. V. Baranowsky Company, Ltd., Appellant, *v.*Guaranty Trust Company of New York, Respondent. Ida V. Gordon et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Guaranty Trust Company of New York, Respondent.

Argued March 16, 1937;

decided April 20, 1937.

*657
      *Nathan A. Smyth*and *Harding Johnson*for appellant.

*Ralph M. Carson, John W. Davis, William C. Cannon, Theodore Kiendl*and *Harold W. Bissell*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
#### § 60.20 Logging FSTD discrepancies.

Each instructor, check airman, or representative of the Administrator conducting training, evaluation, or flight experience, and each person conducting the preflight inspection who discovers a discrepancy, including any missing, malfunctioning, or inoperative components in the FSTD, must write or cause to be written a description of that discrepancy into the discrepancy log at the end of the FSTD preflight or FSTD use session.