alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Purdy *vs.*Warden.

After a peremptory order that a plaintiff furnish a bill of particulars, if an evasive bill be delivered, the defendant may move for judgment of non-pros ; if, however, the bill appear to have been made in good faith, though not satisfactory, the proper course is to apply for better particulars.

The defendant moved for judgment of non-pros, on the ground that a peremptory order for a bill of particulars had been made, and that though a bill *353had been delivered, it was evasive. The plaintiff contended that the bill was not evasive, but a *bona fide*compliance with the order.

*By the Court,*

Nelson, Ch. J.

[672] Where the bill is clearly evasive, the defendant may apply for judgment of non-pros ; but if it appear to have been made in good faith, although the defendant may not be satisfied with it, he should not ask for judgment of non-pros, but ought to apply to the judge who made the original order, for an order for better particulars. The bill in this case is sufficient, and the motion must be denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

[Docket No. TB-00-15]


Flue-Cured Tobacco Advisory Committee; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 
App.) announcement is made of the following committee meeting:

    Name: Flue-Cured Tobacco Advisory Committee.
    Date: June 15, 2000.
    Time: 9 a.m.
    Place: United States Department of Agriculture, (USDA), 
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), Tobacco Programs, Flue-Cured 
Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corporation Building, Room 223, 
1306 Annapolis Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27608.
    Purpose: To establish submarketing areas, discuss selling 
schedules, recommend opening dates, review the operational policies 
and procedures, and other related matters for the 2000 flue-cured 
tobacco marketing season.
    The meeting is open to the public. Persons, other than members, 
who wish to address the Committee at the meeting should contact John 
P. Duncan III, Deputy Administrator, Tobacco Programs, AMS, USDA, AG 
0280, Room 502 Annex Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, D.C. 
20090-6456; (202) 205-0567, prior to the meeting. Written statements 
may be submitted to the Committee before, at, or after the meeting. 
If you need any accommodations to participate in the meeting, please 
contact the Tobacco Programs at (202) 205-0567 by June 7, 2000, and 
inform us of your needs.


    Dated: May 4, 2000.
John P. Duncan III,
Deputy Administrator, Tobacco Programs.
[FR Doc. 00-11837 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families

# AGENCY:

Office of Family Assistance (OFA)/ACF/DHHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice amends Part K of the Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Administration of Children and Families (ACF) as follows: Chapter KH, The Office of Family Assistance (OFA) (65  FR 8980), as last amended in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 23, 2000. This notice reflects the correction of an administrative code given in OFA's new structure for the Division of TANF Information Network listed on page 8981, the first column, in the notice issued February 23, 2000.                    

Delete KH.10 Organization in its entirety and replace with the following:

KH.10 Organization. The Office of Family Assistance is headed by a Director, who reports to the Assistant Secretary for Children and Families. The office is organized as follows:

Office of the Director (KHA)

Division of Policy and Program Development (KHB)

Division of Technical Assistance and Training (KHC)

Division of TANF Information Network (KHG)

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Contact Glenda D. Harden at 202-401-5623.

Dated: May 1, 2000.

Alvin C. Collins,

Director, Office of Family Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-11257  Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Doe Run
Resources Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2004, of the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:
March 23, 2005

|By: | /s/JEFFREY L. ZELMSJeffrey L. Zelms
President & Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



QuickLinks
#### Jackson *vs.*Tanner.

In action by *scire facias,*no declaration is necessary; the plaintiff after appearance of the defendant may *amend of*course, the same as in case of an ordinary declaration, and the amended *scire facias*need not be sealed.

[527] This suit was commenced by *scire facias.*The defendant demurred *to*the same. The plaintiff entered a rule to amend *as of course,*and served an amended *scire facias*on the defendant’s attorney, which was disregarded by the defendant’s attorney, and the plaintiff’s default for not joining in demurrer entered. The plaintiff and defendant made cross-motions: the first, to set aside the default; and the second, to set aside the amended *scire facias,*because not sealed.

*278
      *By the Court.*

By statute, the plaintiff may require the defendant to plead to declaration is necessary. (2 *R. S. 579.)*The writ itself is treated both as process and a pleading. It is substantially a declaration. The defendant in this case has so treated it by demurring to it. No one ever demurred to a writ. If a writ as process is irregular, the motion is to quash or set it aside, or to supersede; but if the writ is a substitute for a declaration, then it should be treated as such, and subject to the same rules, This proceeding is entirely anomalous; but. there seems to be no more impropriety in amending a writ as a declaration, than there is in pleading to it as such. Considered as a pleading, there is no necessity for a seal to the amended writ; the seal is necessary only when it is to be used as process. The writ in this case has performed its office in that respect, before it was returned and filed; and having been demurred to, was treated by the defendant as a declaration. He ought «not, therefore, to object that.it is not to be treated as a declaration. The 23d rule permits an amendment of a declaration in the manner in which, this was dong. the writ, and no

The motion to set aside the amended writ should be denied; and the motion to set aside the default should be granted—but as this is a new point, without costs.
#### § 450.9 Additional license terms and conditions.

The FAA may modify a vehicle operator license at any time by modifying or adding license terms and conditions to ensure compliance with the Act and regulations.
§ 60.35 Specific full flight simulator compliance requirements. ( a ) No device will be eligible for initial or upgrade qualification to a FFS at Level C or Level D under this part unless it includes the equipment and appliances installed and operating to the extent necessary for the issuance of an airman certificate or rating.
( b ) No device will be eligible for initial or upgrade qualification to a FFS at Level A or Level B under this part unless it includes the equipment and appliances installed and operating to the extent necessary for the training, testing, and/or checking that comprise the simulation portion of the requirements for issuance of an airman certificate or rating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5


<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 3rd Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                        (3,675)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 27,725
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                               5,910
<OTHER-SE>                           (33,635)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               0
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         (33,635)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.01)



</TABLE>
#### Anthony Iraggi, Appellant, *v.*Samuel Raymon et al., Respondents.

(Submitted September 28, 1936;

decided September 29, 1936.)

*499
      *Isaac R. Swezey*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
RELEASE NOTES FIRMWARE VERSION 1.1.2.0
MōVI CONTROLLER FIRMWARE VERSION 1.1.2.0

MōVI COMPATIBILITY

MōVI Controller Firmware v1.1.2.0 is 

compatible with all MōVI stabilizers (M5, 

M10, M15) and the following MōVI Firmware 

versions: v3.08 and up.

MōVI Controller Firmware v1.1.2.0 recovers 

the ability to start the Autotune function from 

the MōVI Controller with MōVI Firmware 

version v4.01 and up.

RECORD STAR/STOP

Record Start/Stop triggering is available 

through the Redrock Micro microRemote and 

Hocus Products Axis 1 follow focus systems 

using the MōVI Controller’s Record 

Start/Stop button.

MōVI SETTINGS 

Additional MōVI settings are available in the 

MōVI Config menu:

• Dual Operator Settings: Pan/Tilt Smoothing, 

Pan/Tilt Window, Pan/Tilt Expo, Remote 

Rate Scale.

• Expert Settings: Pan/Tilt/Roll Hold Strengh.

TRANSMITTER SETTINGS

Additional transmitter settings are available 

in the Tx Config menu:

• More remapping options for Pan/Tilt/Roll/

Focus/Iris/Zoom.

• External analog inputs (GPIO1, GPIO2, GPIO3) 

can be mapped to any axis.

FUNCTIONALITY

Roll Trim can be zeroed by pressing both 

Roll Trim buttons simultaneously.

OTHER FIXES

• More digits for Majestic and Dual Operator 

settings to match full MōVI ranges.

• Trimmed leading zeros for better 

number readability.

• Fixed spelling mistake in menu descriptions.

MōVI is a trademark registered in the U.S. Pat. & Tm. Office. FREEFLY, the Wing Logo and Majestic Mode are trademarks of Freefly Systems Inc.

03-15
#### § 39.25 How do I get a special flight permit?

Apply to FAA for a special flight permit following the procedures in 14 CFR 21.199.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Larry L. Richards, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Date: May 13, 2005


/s/ Larry L. Richards
---------------------------------------------------
Larry L. Richards
Controller (Principal Financial and
  Accounting Officer)
Today in Energy

February 17, 2012

Natural gas pipeline capacity additions in 2011

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Notes: Capacity data only include interstate and intrastate transmission projects. Storage capacity additions and other

infrastructure such as gathering and distribution lines are not included.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that U.S. natural gas pipeline companies added about 2,400 miles of new pipe

to the grid as part of over 25 projects in 2011. New pipeline projects entered service in parts of the U.S. natural gas grid that can be

congested: California, Florida, and parts of the Northeast (see map above). Only a portion of this capacity serves incremental natural

gas use; most of these projects facilitate better linkages across the existing natural gas grid.

By convention, the industry expresses annual capacity additions as the sum of the capacities of all the projects completed in that

year. By this measure, the industry added 13.7 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of new capacity to the grid in 2011. The six largest

projects put into service in 2011 added 1,553 miles and about 8.2 Bcf/d of new capacity to the system. Much of this new capacity is

for transporting natural gas between states rather than within states. Golden Pass, Ruby Pipeline, FGT Phase VIII, Pascagoula

Expansion, and Bison Pipeline projects added 6.1 Bcf/d, or about 80%, of new state-to-state capacity.

Natural gas pipeline capacity additions in 2011 were well above the 10 Bcf/d levels typical from 2001-2006, roughly the same as

additions in 2007 and 2010, but significantly below additions in 2008 and 2009 (see chart below). Capacity added in 2008 and 2009

reflected a mix of intrastate and interstate natural gas pipeline expansions, related mostly to shale production, liquefied natural gas

(LNG) terminals, and storage facilities.

Natural gas pipeline capacity additions in 2011 - Today in Energy - U.S.... http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=5050

1 of 2 8/31/2015 8:56 AM
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Notes: Capacity data only include interstate and intrastate transmission projects. Storage capacity additions and other

infrastructure such as gathering and distribution lines are not included.

Natural gas pipeline capacity additions in 2011 - Today in Energy - U.S.... http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=5050

2 of 2 8/31/2015 8:56 AM
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 98-41436

____________

BLUE GULF SEAFOOD INC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

DOLPHIN J, INC; MERMAID SEAFOOD, INC; T& J

OYSTERS, INC,

Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

TRANSTEXAS GAS CORPORATION; FALCON DRILLING

COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(G-98-CV-349)

December 12, 2000

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

-2-

PER CURIAM:*

Blue Gulf Seafood, Inc. (“Blue Gulf”), Dolphin J, Inc. (“Dolphin”), T & J Oysters, Inc. (“T

& J”), and Mermaid Seafood, Inc. (“Mermaid”), appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claims

against TransTexas Gas Corporation (“TransTexas”), and Falcon Drilling Company, Inc. (“Falcon”)

pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). Blue Gulf, Dolphin, and T&J allege that they are Louisiana

corporations; Mermaid alleges it is a Texas corporation. Each alleges ownership rights in oyster

leases in Galveston Bay, Texas. Each asserts that they incurred damages to their oyster beds and

suffered a loss of production due to the activities of TransTexas and Falcon. The district court

properly dismissed Blue Gulf’s, Dolphin’s, and T&J’s complaints for failure to state a claim because

under TEX. PARKS & WILD. CODE § 76.008 foreign corporations are not permitted to “lease and

control land” in Texas, and under TEX. PARKS&WILD.CODE § 76.031 foreign corporations may not

receive a permit to plant or harvest oysters from public waters. Therefore, Blue Gulf, Dolphin, and

T & J have “failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6).

Further, these parties may not defeat dismissal based on the argument that they are commercial

fishermen, because they failed to plead this claim in their complaint. Mermaid’s claim against

TransTexas and Falcon, however, was improperly dismissed because it is a Texas corporation. 

Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal of Blue Gulf’s, Dolphin’s, and T&J’s claims is

AFFIRMED, and the dismissal of Mermaid’s claims is VACATED and REMANDED.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of M Line Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Colin, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      16, 2009
              /s/ George ColinBy:  George ColinIts:  Chief Executive
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
M Line Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by M Line Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### William R. White, as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*Pearl Adler et al., Defendants, and Samuel Ungerleider et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name of Samuel Ungerleider *&*Company, Respondents.

Argued December 4, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*491
      *Harold N. Cohen, Edward Feldman, Isadore H. Cohen*and *Carl J. Austrian*for appellant.

*Mortimer S. Gordon*and *Herman Keller*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Pinch, JJ.7
Editorial Note on Part 294
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 294 appear at 84 FR 15934, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 294.32 Security arrangements for operating Public Charters. When a Canadian charter air taxi operator performs a Public Charter under part 380 of this chapter, either: ( a ) The Canadian charter air taxi operator shall meet the bonding or escrow requirements applicable to foreign air carriers as set forth in § 212.8 of this chapter.
( b ) The Canadian charter air taxi operator shall ensure that it does not receive any payments for the charter until after the charter has been completed. In this case, its contracts with the charter operator and the charter operator's depository bank, if any, shall state that the charter operator or bank, as applicable, shall retain control of and responsibility for all participant funds intended for payment for charter air service until after the charter has been completed, notwithstanding any provision of part 380.
[ER-1257, 46 FR 52591, Oct. 27, 1981, as amended by Doc. No. 2006-25691, 71 FR 49347, Aug. 23, 2006]
§ 29.79 Landing: Category A. ( a ) For Category A rotorcraft— ( 1 ) The landing performance must be determined and scheduled so that if the critical engine fails at any point in the approach path, the rotorcraft can either land and stop safely or climb out and attain a rotorcraft configuration and speed allowing compliance with the climb requirement of § 29.67(a)(2);
( 2 ) The approach and landing paths must be established with the critical engine inoperative so that the transition between each stage can be made smoothly and safely;
( 3 ) The approach and landing speeds must be selected by the applicant and must be appropriate to the type of rotorcraft; and
( 4 ) The approach and landing path must be established to avoid the critical areas of the height-velocity envelope determined in accordance with § 29.87.
( b ) It must be possible to make a safe landing on a prepared landing surface after complete power failure occurring during normal cruise.
[Doc. No. 24802, 61 FR 21900, May 10, 1996]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC)

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, US Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee will 
hold a plenary meeting from 9-4:30 on May 18, 2000. Lunch is not 
included. The ETTAC was created on May 31, 1994, to advise the U.S. 
government on policies and programs to expand U.S. exports of 
environmental products and services.

DATE and PLACE: May 18, 2000. The meeting will take place in Room 6800 
of the Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230.
    The plenary meeting will welcome new members, include an ethics 
briefing, guest speaker on AID-Trade issues, and round table discussion 
on the international water sector with senior government officials.
    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Sage Chandler, Department of Commerce, Office of 
Environmental Technologies Exports. Phone: 202-482-1500.

    Dated: May 1, 2000.
Sage Chandler,
Designated Federal Official, Office of Environmental Technologies 
Exports.
[FR Doc. 00-11752 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P