alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11793]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Stigma Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) Announces the Following Meeting
    Name: Stigma Meeting.
    Time and Date: 9:30 a.m.-4 p.m., June 9, 2000.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Hotel, 265 Peachtree Street, Atlanta, Georgia 
30303.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 54 people.
    Purpose: To discern the role of stigma in communications efforts 
directed at HIV positive and negative persons. To consult and 
collaborate with leading experts to develop strategies for future 
efforts in prevention and to fine tune existing communications plans. 
Our continued efforts to reach those at highest-risk for HIV will 
necessitate collaboration among organizations and audiences 
infrequently reached through CDC's traditional methods.
    Matters To Be Discussed: Agenda items include an overview of the 
stigma issue, presentations on research on stigma and HIV, and an 
expert panel discussion of public health and private sector efforts 
which could together begin to counter stigma associated with HIV 
testing and early entrance into care.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Bonds, National Center for 
HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Office of Communications, 1600 Clifton 
Road, NE, M/S E-07, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/639-8890.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register Notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: May 3, 2000.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 00-11793 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```

[113th Congress Public Law 113]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1174]]

Public Law 113-113
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
5323 Highway N in Cottleville, Missouri as the ``Lance Corporal Phillip 
     Vinnedge Post Office''. <<NOTE: June 9, 2014 -  [H.R. 2391]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL PHILLIP D. VINNEDGE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5323 Highway N in Cottleville, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lance Corporal Phillip Vinnedge Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any references in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Phillip Vinnedge Post Office''.

    Approved June 9, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2391:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Mar. 24, considered and passed House.
            May 21, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
November  10, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Richard WayneRichard WaynePresident (Principal Executive Officer)Date:
November  10, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Edward F. MehmEdward F. MehmTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
 30
#### Frank Mangano, Plaintiff, *v.*Sunbright Steam Laundry Co., Inc., Appellant, and American Employers' Insurance Company of Boston, Respondent.

Argued March 11, 1937;

decided March 25, 1937.

*643
      *Jay Leo Rothschild,*and *Walter S. Beck*for appellant.

*Walter L. Glenney*and *Chauncey L. Grant*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, BLubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0262 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0262

**96/262/EC: Commission Decision of 27 March 1996 amending Commission Decision 93/437/EEC laying down specific conditions for importing fishery products from Argentina (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 089 , 10/04/1996 P. 0036 - 0041 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 27 March 1996 amending Commission Decision 93/437/EEC laying down specific conditions for importing fishery products from Argentina (Text with EEA relevance) (96/262/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 (1), laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products, as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 11 (5) thereof,

Whereas the list of establishments and factory ships approved by Argentina for importing fishery products into the Community has been drawn up in Commission Decision 93/437/EEC (2), as last amended by Decision 96/31/EC (3); whereas the list may be amended following the communication of a new list by the competent authority in Argentina;

Whereas the competent authority in Argentina has communicated a new list adding 12 establishments and 23 factory ships, deleting 6 establishments and 13 factory ships;

Whereas it is necessary to amend the list of approved establishments and factory ships accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision have been drawn up in accordance with the procedure laid down by Commission Decision 90/13/EEC (4),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex B of Decision 93/437/EEC is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 March 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.

(2) OJ No L 202, 12. 8. 1993, p. 42.

(3) OJ No L 9, 12. 1. 1996, p. 6.

(4) OJ No L 8, 11. 1. 1990, p. 70.

ANNEX

'ANNEX B

>TABLE>

>TABLE>
#### Townsend vs. Babcock.

Where papers in opposition to a motion are unnecessarily voluminous, costs will not be allowed, though the motion be denied.

In this case, a motion for re-taxation of costs was denied without costs, and costs were refused, solely on the ground that the papers in opposition to the motion were unnecessarily voluminous. The judge observed that the court would pass upon the question, and not leave it to the taxing officer to determine what facts were necessarily stated.
§ 243.9 Procedures for collecting and maintaining the information. Covered airlines may use any method or procedure to collect, store and transmit the required information, subject to the following conditions: ( a ) Information on individual passengers shall be collected before each passenger boards the aircraft on a covered flight segment.
( b ) The information shall be kept until all passengers have disembarked from the covered flight segment.
( c ) The contact information collected pursuant to section 243.7(a)(2) of this part shall be kept confidential and released only to the U.S. Department of State, the National Transportation Safety Board (upon NTSB's request), and the U.S. Department of Transportation pursuant to oversight of this part. This paragraph does not preempt other governments or governmental agencies that have an independent, legal right to obtain this information.
( d ) The contact information collected pursuant to section 243.7(a)(2) of this part shall only be used by covered airlines for notification of family members or listed contacts following an aviation disaster. The information shall not be used for commercial or marketing purposes.
§ 25.993 Fuel system lines and fittings. ( a ) Each fuel line must be installed and supported to prevent excessive vibration and to withstand loads due to fuel pressure and accelerated flight conditions.
( b ) Each fuel line connected to components of the airplane between which relative motion could exist must have provisions for flexibility.
( c ) Each flexible connection in fuel lines that may be under pressure and subjected to axial loading must use flexible hose assemblies.
( d ) Flexible hose must be approved or must be shown to be suitable for the particular application.
( e ) No flexible hose that might be adversely affected by exposure to high temperatures may be used where excessive temperatures will exist during operation or after engine shut-down.
( f ) Each fuel line within the fuselage must be designed and installed to allow a reasonable degree of deformation and stretching without leakage.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-15, 32 FR 13266, Sept. 20, 1967]
10

20

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

20

10

20

20

10

10

20

20

10

20

20

20

10

20

20

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

20

20

10

20

10

20

10

10

20

10

30

20

10

10

10

20

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

20

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

30

BAFFIN BAY

B A F F I N B A Y

BlackBluff

Pie de

Gallo

Los

Corrallos

Kleberg

Point

Potrero

Cortado La Parra

Ranch SW

La Parra

Ranch NE

La Parra

Ranch

Point of

Rocks

Yarborough

Pass

La Parra

Ranch SE

Riviera

Beach

FEET

FEET

1 270 000 FEET

37' 97°30'

97°30'

32'

07' 27°

30"

07'

97°

32'

30"

37' 30"

30"

15'

27°

27° 27°

97°

10'

35'

12'

15'

30"

10'

35' 30"

12'30" 30"

16 980 000

1 300 000 FEET

16 940000

E

30

6

6

30

30

6

30

6 000m

30

000m

6

30

6 6

30

6 6

30

6

6

6

6

000m

30

30

30

6

30

30

30

6

30

30

30

30

6

30

6

30

30

30

6

30

6 6

30

6

6

30

000m

30

43 48

41 48

41

02

38

11

04

42

14

47

02

37 E

40 46

04

45

07

05

12

06

08

08

09

47

13

14

10

05

40

11

43

39

42

13

03

10

09

38

44

03

06

07

N

12

44

39 45

N

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2797-214

LA PARRA RANCH NE, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

LA PARRA RANCH NE QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2009

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 39 ́

12 MILS

4° 42 ́

83 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

PR

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
§ 437.73 Anomaly recording, reporting and implementation of corrective actions. ( a ) A permittee must record each anomaly that affects a safety-critical system, subsystem, process, facility, or support equipment.
( b ) A permittee must identify all root causes of each anomaly, and implement all corrective actions for each anomaly.
( c ) A permittee must report to the FAA any anomaly of any system that is necessary for complying with §§ 437.55(a)(3), 437.57, and 437.59, and must report the corrective action for each reported anomaly.
( d ) A permittee must implement each corrective action before the next flight.
#### Willingham *v.*The State.

*Violating Prohibition Law.*

(Decided February 3, 1914.

64 South. 544.)

*Intoxicating Liquors; Evidence; Prior Conviction.*— -Evidence of a prior conviction is admissible only after a conviction for the purpose of determining the scope of the punishment as provided by section 3, Acts 1909, p. 10, and hence, the court was in error in compelling the defendant to answer on cross-examination that he had been convicted of violating the prohibition law.

Appeal from Randolph Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. S. L. Brewer.

Tom Willingham was convicted of violating the prohibition law and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

No counsel marked for appellant.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, for the State.

The court was not in error in requiring defendant on cross-examination to answer as to his prior conviction for violating the prohibition law, as it tended to show the character of the sale *charged.*— Pearce *v. State,*40 Ala. 720. It was also admissible to show *intent.-*— In*gram v. State,*89 Ala. 249 ; *Pike v. State,*51 S. W. 395. The bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence, ánd the court will presume any state of the evidence to support the ruling of the trial court.— *Cruise Splawn L. Co. v. Sorrell,*51 South. 727.

THOMAS, J.

The defendant, who ivas tried and convicted of selling whisky, was, as a witness for himself on cross-examination by the state, required by the court, over the timely objection and exception of defendant’s counsel, to answer, which he did affirmatively, *162if lie had not last year been convicted in that county of selling or keeping for sale intoxicating liquors.

Such evidence was entirely immaterial to any issue before the jury on the present trial and was, we do not doubt, highly prejudicial to the case of the defendant. The court was in error in admitting such evidence before the *jury.*— Hammock *v. State,*8 Ala. App. 367, 62 Southh. 322. After defendant’s conviction on the present trial, the court had the right, and it was its duty in determining what punishment it would inflict upon defendant, to ascertain for itself from the records whether or not the defendant had been previously convicted of violating the prohibition laws, since the statute (Acts 1909, p. 10, § 3) makes it incumbent upon the court on a second and every subsequent conviction to impose, as additional punishment, a hard labor sentence for not less than three nor more than six months; but certainly such fact of a prior conviction for a similar offense has and should have no place in the deliberations of the jury upon the guilt or innocence of the defendant on the present trial. For the error of the court in admitting this evidence, the judgment of conviction is reversed.

Reversed and remanded.
#### § 420.51 Responsibilities—general.

A licensee must operate its launch site in accordance with the representations in its application.

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0229, Amdt. 420-9, 85 FR 79716, Dec. 10, 2020]
<PAGE>

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  L.  Evan  Baergen,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of House of Brussels Chocolates Inc. for the quarterly
period  ended  January  31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material
respects  the financial condition and results of operations of House of Brussels
Chocolates  Inc.


                                               By: /s/ L. EVAN BAERGEN
                                                  ------------------------------

                                               Name:   L. EVAN BAERGEN

                                               Title:  Chief  Financial  Officer

                                               Date:   March  14,  2003
Additional NHPA Consultation

Documents (Updated

September 30, 2016)



### Final PSD Permit Decision for

the MCU Facility
§ 27.485 Lateral drift landing conditions. ( a ) The rotorcraft is assumed to be in the level landing attitude, with— ( 1 ) Side loads combined with one-half of the maximum ground reactions obtained in the level landing conditions of § 27.479 (b)(1); and
( 2 ) The loads obtained under paragraph (a)(1) of this section applied— ( i ) At the ground contact point; or
( ii ) For full-swiveling gear, at the center of the axle.
( b ) The rotorcraft must be designed to withstand, at ground contact— ( 1 ) When only the aft wheels contact the ground, side loads of 0.8 times the vertical reaction acting inward on one side, and 0.6 times the vertical reaction acting outward on the other side, all combined with the vertical loads specified in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) When all wheels contact the ground simultaneously— ( i ) For the aft wheels, the side loads specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and
( ii ) For the forward wheels, a side load of 0.8 times the vertical reaction combined with the vertical load specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
----

|                                      | **KPMG LLP** | Telephone      | (514) 840-2100 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------|----------------|----------------|
| **Chartered    Accountants**         | Fax          | (514) 840-2187 |
| 600 de Maisonneuve    Blvd. West     | Internet     | www.kpmg.ca    |
| Suite 1500                           |         |           |
| Montréal Québec H3A    03A |         |           |

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors of Gildan Activewear Inc. 

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of: 

-  our auditors'  report dated December 6, 2006 on the consolidated balance sheets of Gildan  Activewear Inc. as at October 1, 2006 and October 2, 2005 and the consolidated  statements of earnings, retained earnings and cash flows for the years ended  October 1, 2006, October 2, 2005 and October 3, 2004our auditors' report  dated December 6, 2006 on reconciliation to United States generally accepted  accounting principlesour Report on  Internal Control over Financial Reporting under Standards of the Public  Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) dated December 6, 2006 on  management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over  financial reporting as of October 1, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal  control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2006
each of which isincluded in this annual report on Form 40-F of Gildan Activewear Inc. for thefiscal year ended October 1, 2006.
/s/KPMG LLP 

Chartered Accountants 

Montréal, Canada December 20, 2006 
**KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership is theCanadian member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.**
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Harry A. Barmeier, Deceased. Thomas J. Reese, Appellant; Brooklyn Trust Company et al., Respondents.

(Argued September 30, 1936;

decided November 17, 1936.)

*602
      *Charles W. Froessel*and *George P. Stier*for appellant.

*Walter Bruchhausen*for Brooklyn Trust Company et al., respondents.

*William A. Robinson*as special guardian for Lorraine Anthony et al., respondents.

*Royal A. Curtis*as special guardian for Harry G. Barmeier, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing and filing briefs payable out of the estate. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Lough-ran and Finch, JJ.; Crane, Ch. J., taking no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT MARCH 31, 2000 WHICH ARE INCLUDED
IN THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001072816
<NAME>                        Contessa Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         796,108
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               796,108
<PP&E>                                         19,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 820,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,328
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       837
<OTHER-SE>                                     659,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   820,012
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               209,476
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (211,241)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (211,241)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (211,241)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)


</TABLE>