alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT D 

SUMMARY OF BENNAZAR, GARCÍA & MILIÁN, C.S.P. EXPENSES 

Expense Description Amount 

Travel 

 Airfare $5,225.37

 Hotel $8,476.30

 Ground Transportation $1,633.91

 Combined Flight and Hotel Charge $5,958.51

Document Translations $141.00 

Messenger Services $40.00 

Printing Expense $476.17

Postage $27.90 

TOTAL $21,979.16 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3539-4 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 16:03:19 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 1 of 1
§ 33.91 Engine system and component tests. ( a ) For those systems or components that cannot be adequately substantiated in accordance with endurance testing of § 33.87, the applicant must conduct additional tests to demonstrate that the systems or components are able to perform the intended functions in all declared environmental and operating conditions.
( b ) Temperature limits must be established for those components that require temperature controlling provisions in the aircraft installation to assure satisfactory functioning, reliability, and durability.
( c ) Each unpressurized hydraulic fluid tank may not fail or leak when subjected to a maximum operating temperature and an internal pressure of 5 p.s.i., and each pressurized hydraulic fluid tank must meet the requirements of § 33.64.
( d ) For an engine type certificated for use in supersonic aircraft, the systems, safety devices, and external components that may fail because of operation at maximum and minimum operating temperatures must be identified and tested at maximum and minimum operating temperatures and while temperature and other operating conditions are cycled between maximum and minimum operating values.
[Doc. No. 3025, 29 FR 7453, June 10, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 33-6, 39 FR 35469, Oct. 1, 1974; Amdt. 33-26, 73 FR 48285, Aug. 19, 2008; Amdt. 33-27, 73 FR 55437, Sept. 25, 2008; Amdt. 33-27, 73 FR 57235, Oct. 2, 2008]
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00017-CR

ROBERTO PEREZ

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On appeal from the

117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-CR-0909-B (S1)

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 21, 2013
#### §§ 420.6-420.14 [Reserved]
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Irwin Gross, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Amalgamated
Technologies, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to me by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
         quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c) Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls; and

     6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 20, 2004

/s/ Irwin Gross
-------------------
Irwin Gross
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### Seymour *vs.*Slocum.

A bill of exceptions taken at the trial does not *per se*operate as a stay of proceedings. If the party presenting the bill desires to stay the proceedings of his adversary, he must obtain an order to that effect.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7040

PHILLIP A. GILLIAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KATE SHELLMAN, Parole Officer; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-02-105-3) Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 9, 2002 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phillip A. Gilliam, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Phillip A. Gilliam appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to pay a partial filing fee. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gilliam v. Shellman , No. CA-02-105-3 (E.D. Va. June 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 460.15 Human factors. An operator must take the precautions necessary to account for human factors that can affect a crew's ability to perform safety-critical roles, including in the following safety critical areas— ( a ) Design and layout of displays and controls;
( b ) Mission planning, which includes analyzing tasks and allocating functions between humans and equipment;
( c ) Restraint or stowage of all individuals and objects in a vehicle; and
( d ) Vehicle operation, so that the vehicle will be operated in a manner that flight crew can withstand any physical stress factors, such as acceleration, vibration, and noise.
#### Sarah E. Murnick, Doing Business under the Name of Wilmur Knitting Mills, Respondent, *v.*National-Ben Franklin Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg et al., Appellants.

Argued January 14, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*John L. Fletcher*for appellants.

*Charles Abrams*and *Morris J. Helman*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Loughran and Rippey, JJ. Dissenting: Hubbs, J. Taking no part: Finch, J.
#### Trust Company of North America, Appellant, *v.*A. Hammer Cooperage Corporation, Respondent.

(Submitted September 28, 1936;

decided October 6, 1936.)

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 272 N. Y. 479.)
The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 11, 2000.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

1. Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.,  Leawood, Kansas; to acquire 33.33 percent of the voting shares of Unison Bancorp, Inc., Lenexa, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire Western National Bank, Lenexa, Kansas.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 12, 2000.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 00-1162 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Edjomac Amusement Corporation, Respondent, *v.*Empire State Motion Picture Operators’ Union, Inc., Defendant, and Empire State Theatrical Stage Employees’ Union, Inc., Appellant.

Argued March 19, 1937;

decided April 20, 1937.

*648
      *Joseph A. Teperson*for appellant.

*David Altman*and *Hyman J. Reit*for respondent.

Judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term reversed, and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, on the authority of *Stillwell Theatre, Inc.,*v. *Kaplan*(259 N. Y. 405). No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
§ 414.11 Application. An applicant may submit an application for a safety element approval in one of two ways: ( a ) Separate from a vehicle operator license application in accordance with § 414.13; or
( b ) Concurrent with a vehicle operator license application in accordance with § 414.15.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ron Moskovitz, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Amdocs Limited;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) [Not applicable]

     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: December 28, 2005

/s/ Ron Moskovitz
---------------------------------------------------------
Ron Moskovitz
Chief Financial Officer
Amdocs Management Limited
#### Joseph Cameron, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Frank J. Powers, *Defendant in Error.*

In an action for brokerage for bringing about a sale of realty, evidence that another agency to Avhom a commission was paid, was the actual procuring cause is admissible.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Orange County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*W. L. Palmer,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Massey*& *Warlow,*for Defendant in Error.

*109Cockrell, J.

— Powers recovered judgment for commissions on the sale of certain lands near Sanford, Florida, owned by Cameron.

There is a sharp conflict of testimony as to whether Cameron made the contract with Powers for the commissions or knew that Powers claimed to be acting for him in the sale.

A defense was sought to be interposed based upon the theory that another agency to whom a commission was paid, was the actual procuring cause of the sale, but •evidence looking to this defense was erroneously excluded. 'The court seems to have proceeded upon the idea that the •defense was limited to a direct contradiction of the evidence for the plaintiff, and would not admit evidence of what was done by the other agency to' bring about the sale.

The broker here was not to be paid for introducing a purchaser, but for bringing about the sale, and the question who effected the sale should have been gone into fully. Wiggins v. Wilson, 55 Fla. 346, 45 South. Rep. 1011.

Whitfield, C. J., and Taylor, Shackleford and Hooker, J. J., concur.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

WHEREAS, the undersigned officers and directors of ITXC Corp. ("ITXC") desire to
authorize Tom Evslin and Edward B. Jordan to act as their attorneys-in-fact and
agents, for the purpose of executing and filing the annual report described
below, including all amendments and supplements thereto,

NOW, THEREFORE,

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints Tom Evslin and Edward B. Jordan, and each of them, his
true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and
re-substitution, to sign the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001, including any and all amendments and supplements
to such Annual report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their
or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this power of attorney in the
following capacities as of the 26th day of March, 2002.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                              <C>
Signature                           Title
---------                           -----

/s/ Tom Evslin                   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
--------------------------------
Tom Evslin

/s/ Frank Gill                   Director
--------------------------------
Frank Gill

/s/ Edward B. Jordan             Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and
-------------------------------- Director
Edward B. Jordan

/s/ William P. Collatos          Director
--------------------------------
William P. Collatos

/s/ Frank Gill                   Director
--------------------------------
Frank Gill

/s/ Frederick R. Wilson          Director
--------------------------------
Frederick R. Wilson
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       50
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,067
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           896
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,067
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       95
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (95)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (95)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (95)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 404.3 General. ( a ) Any person may petition the Associate Administrator to: ( 1 ) Issue, amend, or repeal a regulation to eliminate as a requirement for a license or permit any requirement of Federal law applicable to commercial space launch and reentry activities and the operation of launch and reentry sites;
( 2 ) Waive any such requirement in the context of a specific application for a license or permit; or
( 3 ) Waive the requirement for a license, except as provided in § 404.7(b).
( b ) A petition filed under this section may request, under § 413.9 of this chapter, that the Associate Administrator withhold certain trade secrets or proprietary commercial or financial data from public disclosure.
( c ) Each petitioner filing under this section must: ( 1 ) For electronic submission, send one copy of the petition by email to the Office of Commercial Space Transportation at *ASTpetition@faa.gov ;* or
( 2 ) For paper submission, send one copy of the petition to the Office of Commercial Space Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Room 331, Washington, DC 20591.
( d ) Each petition filed under this section must include the petitioner's name, mailing address, telephone number and any other contact information, such as an email address or a fax number.
( e ) *Notification.* When the Associate Administrator determines that a petition should be granted or denied, the Associate Administrator notifies the petitioner of the Associate Administrator's action and the reasons supporting the action.
( f ) *Reconsideration.* Any person may petition the FAA to reconsider a denial of a petition the person filed. The petitioner must send a request for reconsideration within 60 days after being notified of the denial to the same address to which the original petition was filed. For the FAA to accept the reconsideration request, the petitioner must show— ( 1 ) There is a significant additional fact and the reason it was not included in the original petition;
( 2 ) The FAA made an important factual error in its denial of the original petition; or
( 3 ) The denial is not in accordance with the applicable law and regulations.
( g ) *Public hearing.* No public hearing, argument or other proceeding is held on a petition before its disposition under this section.
[Doc. No. FAA-2005-21234, 71 FR 51971, Aug. 31, 2006, as amended at 72 FR 68475, Dec. 5, 2007; Doc. No. FAA-2016-6761; Amdt. No. 404-6, 83 FR 28534, June 20, 2018]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(b)

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 (Registration Nos. 333-102134 and 811-05301)
of our report dated February 13, 2003 relating to the financial statements of
AIG Life Insurance Company and our report dated April 8, 2003 relating to the
financial statements of AIG Life Insurance Company Variable Account I, which
appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us
under the heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas
April 25, 2003