alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, US Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee will hold a plenary meeting from 9-4:30 on May 18, 2000. Lunch is not included. The ETTAC was created on May 31, 1994, to advise the U.S. government on policies and programs to expand U.S. exports of environmental products and services. 

# DATE and PLACE:

May 18, 2000. The meeting will take place in Room 6800 of the Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. 

The plenary meeting will welcome new members, include an ethics briefing, guest speaker on AID-Trade issues, and round table discussion on the international water sector with senior government officials. 

This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Sage Chandler, Department of Commerce, Office of Environmental Technologies Exports. Phone: 202-482-1500. 

Dated: May 1, 2000. 

Sage Chandler, 

Designated Federal Official, Office of Environmental Technologies Exports. 

[FR Doc. 00-11752 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
#### Louis H. Pink, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*Investors Syndicate Title and Guaranty Company, Respondent.

Argued December 3, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*484
      *John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Paul R. Taylor*and *Henry Epstein*of counsel), for appellant.

*Frank L. Wiswall*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crotjgh, Lough-ran and Finch, JJ. Not voting: Crane, Ch. J.
Exhibit 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Robert Ellin, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report of Amalgamated Technologies, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the registrant and have:

      a)    designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed  under  my
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant  is made known to me,  particularly  during the period in
            which this report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the
            end of the period  covered by this report based on such  evaluation;
            and

      c)    disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation of internal control
      over  financial  reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit
      committee of the  registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing
      the equivalent functions):

      a)    all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.


Date: August 22, 2005


/s/ Robert Ellin
-----------------------
Robert Ellin
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 325.2 Applicability.

This part applies to essential air service determinations for communities designated as eligible under 49 U.S.C. 41731 and to eligible place designations and essential air service determinations for communities that qualify under 49 U.S.C. 41732 and 41733. It applies to the gathering of data by the Department, and to the participation of State, local, and other officials and other interested persons in the designation and determination processes.

Note to § 325.2: Criteria for designating eligible points under section 419(b) are contained in part 270 of this chapter. Guidelines for deciding essential air service levels are contained in part 398 of this chapter.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15938, Apr. 16, 2019]
#### George Floyd, *Plaintiff in Error, v.*J. M. Bell, *Sheriff, Defendant in Error.*

Whore an information is good under a general road law, alleged unconstitutional provisions in a special road law will not warrant the discharge in habeas corpus proceedings of one arrested under such information.

This case was decided bv Division A.

*51Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Walton County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

W. *T. Bludioorth,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Park Trammell,*Attorney General, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam

— In habeas corpus proceedings before the Circuit Judge, George Floyd, was remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Walton county under a capias issued from the Criminal Court of Record for Walton County, upon an information charging that George Floyd “having been lawfully summoned and required to work the public road in said Walton County-did then and there unlawfully fail and refuse to work said road or to furnish a substitute or pay the amount required by law for each day he so failed and refused to work said road.”

On writ of error allowed by the Circuit Judge, it is contended that Chapter 6315, Acts of 1911, a special law for public road working in Walton County is unconstitutional on various grounds, and that consequently the remand of the petitioner was error.

Even if Chapter 6315, be invalid as alleged, the information is good under the general laws of the State providing duties and penalties for defaults in working public roads of the State. Sec. 3670, Gen. Stats, 1906.

The order remanding the petitioner is affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford and Cockrell, J. J., concur.

*52Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, J. J., concur in the opinion.
On April 23, 1998, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) issued a notice for the Upper and Middle Dams Storage Project (FERC No. UL 94-1) proposing to establish a restricted service list for the purpose of developing and executing a Programmatic Agreement for managing properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The Upper and Middle Dams Storage Project is located in the headwaters of the Androscoggin River, in Oxford and Franklin Counties, Maine. FPL Energy Maine Hydro, LLC is the licensee.

                    Rule 2010 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure provides that, to eliminate unnecessary expense or improve administrative efficiency, the Secretary may establish a restricted service list for a particular phase or issue in a processing.[1]                                          The restricted service list should contain the names of persons on the service list who, in the judgment of the decisional authority establishing the list, are active participants with respect to the phase or issue in the proceeding for which the list is established.                

The following addition is made to the restricted service list notice issued on April 23, 1998: Frank H. Dunlap, FPL Energy Maine Hydro, LLC, 100 Middle Street, Portland ME 04101.

The address for Mr. David Dominie has changed. Delete “Central Maine Power Company, North Augusta Office Annex, 41 Anthony Avenue, Augusta, ME 04330” and replace with “EPRO, 41 Anthony Avenue, Augusta, ME 04330''.

The following are deleted from the restricted service list notice issued on April 23, 1998:

Jeffrey P. Musich, PE, Union Water Power Company, 150 Maine Street, Lewiston, ME 04243-1225.

R. Alec Giffen, Land & Water Associates,  9 Union Street, Hallowell, ME 04347.

Mona M. Janopaul, Trout Unlimited, 1500 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22209.

Sarah Verville, Esq., Central Maine Power Company, Edison Drive, Augusta, ME 04336.

Tom Sullivan, Gomez and Sullivan Engineers, 150 Concord State Road, Dunbarton, NH 03045.

Any person on the official service list for the above-captioned proceeding may request inclusion on the restricted service list. Such a request must be filed with the David P. Boergers, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, and served on each person whose name appears on the official service list. If no such requests are filed, the modified restricted service list will be effective at the end of the 15-day period. Otherwise, a further notice will be issued ruling on the motion.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 385.2010.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-1182 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Crim. No. 520.

Second Appellate District.

November 11, 1916.]

#### In re E. R. WAITE on Habeas Corpus.

County Ordinance—Penalty.—Writ of *habeas corpus*discharged on the authority of *People*v. *Pages, ante,*p. 37.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

The facts are similar to those stated in *People*v. *Pages, ante,*p. 37.

Allison & Dickson, for Petitioner.

T. W. Duckworth, District Attorney, and John L. Campbell, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

JAMES, J.

The ground upon which petitioner seeks to be discharged from custody is that the ordinance of the board of supervisors of the county of San Bernardino, under which he was convicted, is void because the maximum punishment therein provided is in excess of the power of the local legislative body to prescribe. The argument to that point has been given full consideration in the opinion filed this day in the case of *People*v. *Jean Fages,*Crim. No. 504, *ante,*p. 37, where the decision is adverse to the appellant’s contention. In deciding this application it will be sufficient to refer to that case for the views of the court on the question presented.

The writ is discharged and the petitioner remanded to the custody of the sheriff of San Bernardino County.

Conrey, P. J., and Shaw, J., concurred.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Nadine King, Appellant.

Submitted March 22, 1937;

decided March 25, 1937.

*647
      *William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney (Le Boy Mandle*of counsel), for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
#### § 460.17 Verification program.

An operator must successfully verify the integrated performance of a vehicle's hardware and any software in an operational flight environment before allowing any space flight participant on board during a flight. Verification must include flight testing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 43

#### Editorial Note:

For miscellaneous technical amendments to this part 43, see Amdt. 43-3, 31 FR 3336, Mar. 3, 1966, and Amdt. 43-6, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

#### § 43.16 Airworthiness limitations.

Each person performing an inspection or other maintenance specified in an Airworthiness Limitations section of a manufacturer's maintenance manual or Instructions for Continued Airworthiness shall perform the inspection or other maintenance in accordance with that section, or in accordance with operations specifications approved by the Administrator under part 121 or 135, or an inspection program approved under § 91.409(e).

[71 FR 44188, Aug. 4, 2006]
##### 





EXHIBIT 32(b)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Alan S. Dawes, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.

|               |  |                                                                                                                         
|-------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|April 16, 2004 |  | /s/ ALAN S. DAWES
    ------------------------------
    Alan S. Dawes
    Vice Chairman and
    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ADDED BY
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SunCoast Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John S. Wilks, Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
         results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
         by the report.


Date:  May 9, 2003               By:  /s/ John S. Wilks
      -----------------                ----------------------------------------
                                       John S. Wilks, Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer and
                                       Principal Accounting Officer)
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Open-File Report 2013-1020

Pubs Warehouse

----

## **High-Resolution Geophysical Data Collected Aboard the U.S. Geological Survey Research Vessel *Rafael* to Supplement Existing Datasets From Buzzards Bay and Vineyard Sound, Massachusetts**

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1020/html/ofr2013-1020_abstract.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 05:13:03 PM
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 68A/2011

| | ISSN 1725-5228
  doi:10.3000/17255228.CA2011.068.pol |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 68A |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Tom 543 marca 2011 |

ISSN 1725-5228

doi:10.3000/17255228.CA2011.068.pol

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 68A

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Tom 543 marca 2011

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Sprostowania |
| 2011/C 068A/01 | Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o konkursie otwartym EPSO/AST/112/10 — Asystenci (AST 3) (Dz.U. C 341 z 16.12.2010) | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

Sprostowania

2011/C 068A/01

Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o konkursie otwartym EPSO/AST/112/10 — Asystenci (AST 3) (Dz.U. C 341 z 16.12.2010)

(Dz.U. C 341 z 16.12.2010)

1

PRZEGLĄD DZIENNIKÓW URZĘDOWYCH SERII C A — KONKURSY

Poniżej znajduje się lista Dzienników Urzędowych serii C A opublikowanych w tym roku.

O ile nie wskazano inaczej, Dzienniki Urzędowe opublikowane zostały we wszystkich wersjach językowych.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

Sprostowania

| 3.3.2011 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 68/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2011

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 68/1

---

Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o konkursie otwartym EPSO/AST/112/10 — Asystenci (AST 3)

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 341 A z dnia 16 grudnia 2010 r.
  )

(2011/C 68 A/01)

Strona 3, sekcja IV.2:

zamiast:

| „Test d) | umiejętności zawodowych:


  dokładność i precyzja | punktacja: od 0 do 20 pkt


  wymagane minimum: 10 pkt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Test e) | umiejętności zawodowych:


  ustalanie priorytetów i organizacja | punktacja: od 0 do 20 pkt


  wymagane minimum: 10 pkt” |

„Test d)

umiejętności zawodowych:

dokładność i precyzja

punktacja: od 0 do 20 pkt

wymagane minimum: 10 pkt

Test e)

umiejętności zawodowych:

ustalanie priorytetów i organizacja

punktacja: od 0 do 20 pkt

wymagane minimum: 10 pkt”

powinno być:

| „Test d) | umiejętności zawodowych:


  dokładność i precyzja | punktacja: od 0 do 20 pkt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Test e) | umiejętności zawodowych:


  ustalanie priorytetów i organizacja | punktacja: od 0 do 20 pkt |
| | Wymagane minimum: 20 pkt w testach d) i e) łącznie” |

„Test d)

umiejętności zawodowych:

dokładność i precyzja

punktacja: od 0 do 20 pkt

Test e)

umiejętności zawodowych:

ustalanie priorytetów i organizacja

punktacja: od 0 do 20 pkt

Wymagane minimum: 20 pkt w testach d) i e) łącznie”

---
§ 435.2 Licenses. ( a ) *Definitions.* For the purposes of this subpart, the definitions of § 401.5 of this chapter apply.
( b ) *Compliance with part 450 of this chapter .* Operations under this part must comply with launch and reentry collision avoidance requirements in § 450.169 and critical asset protection requirements in § 450.101(a)(4) and (b)(4).
[Doc. No. FAA-2019-0229, Amdt. 435-5, 85 FR 79718, Dec. 10, 2020]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SunCoast Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, John S. Wilks, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ John S. Wilks                     
|                        |  |     |  | John S. Wilks, Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer and      
|                        |  |     |  | Principal Accounting Officer)
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4334 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the process by which 

a member of the Armed Forces may be referred for a mental health 

evaluation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2020 

Ms. MCSALLY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the 

process by which a member of the Armed Forces may 

be referred for a mental health evaluation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Brandon Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. MANDATORY REFERRAL OF MEMBERS OF THE 

6 ARMED FORCES FOR MENTAL HEALTH EVAL7 UATION. 

8 Section 1090a of title 10, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4334 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as sub2 section (f); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the fol4 lowing new subsection: 

5 ‘‘(e) PROCESS APPLICABLE TO MEMBER DISCLO6 SURE.—The regulations required by subsection (a) shall— 

7 ‘‘(1) establish a phrase that enables a member 

8 of the armed forces to trigger a referral of the mem9 ber by a commanding officer or supervisor for a 

10 mental health evaluation; 

11 ‘‘(2) require a commanding officer or supervisor 

12 to make such referral as soon as practicable fol13 lowing disclosure by the member to the commanding 

14 officer or supervisor of the phrase established under 

15 paragraph (1); and 

16 ‘‘(3) ensure that the referral process protects 

17 the confidentiality of the member in a manner simi18 lar to the confidentiality provided for members mak19 ing restricted reports under section 1565b(b) of this 

20 title.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS