alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


 


	
  To:

  	
   

  	
  Koninklijke
  Philips Electronics N.V.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  F.a.o.
  Corporate Treasury Department

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Breitner
  Center, Building HBT 12

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  1070 MX
  Amsterdam

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  The
  Netherlands

  



Date:  March 28, 2003


Number        9411


 


Dear Sirs,


 


In consideration of you granting
a guarantee, dated March 28, 2003 with reference 9411 to ABN AMRO Bank N.V. for
our obligations under any loan agreements entered into on the terms and
conditions set out in the letter of March 28, 2003 and the Promissory Note of
March 28, 2003 as referred to in the guarantee (which guarantee is attached to
this letter in the form of a final draft, conformed copy or copy of the
executed version, initialed by us for identification purposes, hereinafter the
“Guarantee”).


 


We herewith irrevocably
guarantee payment to you of all sums paid by you in accordance with the
Guarantee which payment will be effected without undue delay upon receipt by us
of a written request for payment substantially in the form as attached to this
counter guarantee.  Such payment shall
be made to the account identified in the request for payment.


 


Within five business days after
the signing hereof, we will pay you a fee equal to 12,5 basis points over the
Amount to US# 4,688 (four thousand six hundred and eighty eight US Dollars).


 


Any payments by us hereunder
shall be made free and clear of transfer taxes, withholding taxes or similar
charges.


 


The aforementioned obligations
cannot be cancelled or terminated by us. 
This letter shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of The Netherlands.  Any dispute
arising hereunder or in connection herewith shall be submitted in first
instance to the District Court of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.


 


	
  Navigation
  Technologies Corporation

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Judson
  C. Green

  	
   

  	
  /s/ David B.
  Mullen

  	
   

  
	
  President
  and CEO

  	
  EVP and CFO
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:



In connection with this quarterly report of PharmaNetics, Inc.on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his/her knowledge:



1. This report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and



2. The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of PharmaNetics,
Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



Date: May 14, 2004



/s/ John P. FunkhouserJohn P. FunkhouserChief Executive Officer
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Kenney, James (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 8:26 AM

To: wcampbell@balfourbeattyus.com

Cc: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Subject: Section 333 exemption request

Mr. Campbell,

The FAA is in the process of reviewing your petition and request your assistance.  We do not have any of the

attachments which you may have included with your application.  Specifically, you mention a Flight Manual and Skycatch

flight manual.  If you can forward these manuals to me, we will ensure that they are considered in our evaluation.  We

will need any information you wish to provide by cob March 9, 2015.  Any manuals which you provide will be treated as

confidential.

Thank you for your assistance.

James. Kenney

Aviation Safety Inspector
§ 27.783 Doors. ( a ) Each closed cabin must have at least one adequate and easily accessible external door.
( b ) Each external door must be located where persons using it will not be endangered by the rotors, propellers, engine intakes, and exhausts when appropriate operating procedures are used. If opening procedures are required, they must be marked inside, on or adjacent to the door opening device.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 8001, Mar. 6, 1990]
#### §§ 431.16-431.20 [Reserved]
§ 431.59 Issuance of payload reentry determination. ( a ) The FAA issues a favorable payload reentry determination unless it determines that reentry of the proposed payload would adversely affect U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, would jeopardize public health and safety or the safety of property, or would not be consistent with international obligations of the United States. The FAA responds to any person who has requested a payload reentry review of its determination in writing. The notice states the reasons for the determination in the event of an unfavorable determination.
( b ) Any person issued an unfavorable payload reentry determination may respond to the reasons for the determination and request reconsideration.
#### §§ 65.46-65.46b [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.610 Final order. ( a ) When a complaint or request for determination stands submitted to the Secretary for final decision on the merits, he or she may dispose of the issues presented by entering an appropriate order, which will include a statement of the reasons for his or her findings and conclusions. Such an order shall be deemed a final order of the Secretary.
( b ) The final order of the Secretary shall include, where necessary, directions regarding an appropriate refund or credit of the fee increase or newly established fee which is the subject of the complaint or request for determination.
( c ) If the Secretary has not issued a final order within 120 days after the filing of a complaint by an air carrier or foreign air carrier, the decision of the administrative law judge shall be deemed to be the final order of the Secretary.
#### In the Matter of the Election of Directors of The Lawrence-Cedarhurst Bank. Clinton Street Realty Corporation et al., Appellants; The Lawrence-Cedarhurst Bank et al., Respondents.

(Argued November 17, 1936;

decided December 1, 1936.)

*647
      *Carl E. Peterson*for appellants.

*Kenneth M. Spence*for Harry Zalkin et al., respondents.

*Edward S. Bentley*for Lawrence-Cedarhurst Bank, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 06/25/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Goal Computation Call with the State of Colorado held on 06/23/2014

SUMMARY: 

EPA Headquarters and Region 8 staff discussed the computation of the State of Colorado goal under the 

proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants on 06/23/2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA HQ: Kevin Culligan, Travis Johnson, Jan Cortelyou, and Brian Fisher

EPA Region 8: Laura Farris, Mark Komp

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment: Dena Wojtach, Curtis Taipale

ATTACHMENTS

Discussion Questions
Exhibit 32.1

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I, Beaufort J.B.  Clarke,  Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer of ICON Capital
Corp.,  the General  Partner of the  Registrant  in  connection  with the Annual
Report of ICON Income  Fund Eight A L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-K for
year  ended  December  31,  2005,  as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report") certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The  information  contained in the Annual  Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.


Dated:   April 4, 2006

 /s/ Beaufort J.B. Clarke
-------------------------
Beaufort J.B. Clarke
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ICON Capital Corp.
General Partner of ICON Income Eight A L.P.
#### International Mutoscope Reel Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, *v.*Lewis J. Valentine, Individually and as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

(Submitted June 5, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

Motion to amend remittitur denied. (See 271 N. Y. 622.)
#### § 65.79 Skill requirements.

Each applicant for a mechanic certificate or rating must pass an oral test and a practical test, as appropriate to the rating sought, by demonstrating satisfactory understanding of the knowledge, risk management, and skill elements for each subject contained in the Aviation Mechanic General, Airframe, and Powerplant Airmen Certification Standards (incorporated by reference, see § 65.23), as appropriate to the rating sought.

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0237; Amdt. No. 65-63, 87 FR 31415, May 24, 2022]
#### § 33.25 Accessory attachments.

The engine must operate properly with the accessory drive and mounting attachments loaded. Each engine accessory drive and mounting attachment must include provisions for sealing to prevent contamination of, or unacceptable leakage from, the engine interior. A drive and mounting attachment requiring lubrication for external drive splines, or coupling by engine oil, must include provisions for sealing to prevent unacceptable loss of oil and to prevent contamination from sources outside the chamber enclosing the drive connection. The design of the engine must allow for the examination, adjustment, or removal of each accessory required for engine operation.

[Amdt. 33-10, 49 FR 6851, Feb. 23, 1984]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30128-30129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AK-962-1410-00-P; F-14874-K]


Notice for Publication; Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue

[[Page 30129]]

conveyance under the provisions of Sec. 14(a) of the Alaska Native 
Claims Settlement Act of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(a), 
will be issued to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc., for the village of 
Kiana. The lands involved are in the vicinity of Kiana, Alaska.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Serial No. and land description                  Acreage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Kateel River Meridian, Alaska
F-14874-K: T. 19 N., R. 6 W., Secs. 21, 22, 23, 27 & 28......   3,200.00
F-14874-K: T. 20 N., R. 9 W., Secs. 4 to 8, inclusive........   3,030.66
F-14874-K: T. 17 N., R. 8 W., Secs. 5 & 6....................   1,162.15
                                                              ----------
    Aggregating..............................................   7,392.81
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Arctic Sounder Newspaper. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 (907) 271-5960.
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until June 9, 2000 to file an appeal. However, 
parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days from the 
date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau 
of Land Management at the address identified above, where the 
requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do not 
file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 4, 
subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.

Nora A. Benson,
Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 00-11650 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
#### § 431.15 Rights not conferred by a reusable launch vehicle mission license.

Issuance of an RLV mission license does not relieve a licensee of its obligation to comply with requirements of law that may apply to its activities.
#### In the Matter of Mendoza Fur Dyeing Works, Inc., Respondent, against Frank J. Taylor, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant.

Submitted March 1, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

Motion for reargument or to amend the remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 272 N. Y. 275.)
§ 398.8 Number of intermediate stops. ( a ) Except in Alaska, no more than one intermediate stop is permitted in providing essential air service between the eligible place and its hub, unless otherwise agreed to with the community. In cases where an eligible place receives service to two hubs, however, more than one intermediate stop is permitted between that place and its secondary hub.
( b ) In Alaska, more than one intermediate stop is permitted if required by low traffic levels at the eligible place or by the long distance between the eligible place and its hub.
( c ) The Department may specify nonstop service when necessary to make the service viable.
( d ) Where an eligible place normally is an intermediate stop that shares available capacity with another place, it is the policy of the Department either to require additional capacity (more flights or larger aircraft) between the eligible place and its hub or to specify some turnaround operations on that route segment.
#### § 385.7 Exercise of authority by superiors.

Any assignment of authority to a staff member other than the Chief Administrative Law Judge, the Administrative Law Judge, and the General Counsel, shall also be deemed to be made, severally, to each such staff member's respective superiors. In accordance with the Department's principle of management responsibility, the superior may choose to exercise the assigned power personally. Moreover, the Secretary may at any time exercise any authority assigned herein.

[Docket No. T-1, 49 FR 50985, Dec. 31, 1984, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15942, Apr. 16, 2019]
#### § 415.102 Definitions.

For the purposes of this subpart, the definitions of § § 417.3 and 401.5 of this chapter apply.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Jadusingh, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 495]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered September 16, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental *pro se*brief. To the extent that the defendant raises the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel, the various factual assertions involve matters dehors the record. Therefore, the defendant’s claim is not properly before this Court on direct appeal *(see, People v Grazzette,*211 AD2d 822; *People v Dyson,*
      *236200 AD2d 756). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 380

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### §§ 380.41-380.42 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of KeySpan  Corporation (the "Corporation")
for the year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald Luterman, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            /s/Gerald Luterman
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Name: Gerald Luterman
                                            Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                            Date: March 11, 2004
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, George P. Ahearn, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of a period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
#### Jack C. MASSENGALE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 14038.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 15, 1960.

Clifford E. Adams, Cincinnati, Ohio, argued by and on brief, for appellant.

James E. Applegate, Asst. U. S. Atty., Cincinnati, Ohio, Hugh K. Martin, U. S. Atty., Thomas Stueve, First Asst. U. S. Atty., Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief, for appellee.

Before MARTIN, MILLER and WEICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge entered an *ex parte*order, by writing upon an entry of appearance tendered by the appellant as. attorney in a pending case that the appellant “Jack C. Massengale is presently on parole by reason of a sentence out of this court and by reason thereof is disqualified from acting in the above entitled case.”

Appellant thereafter was found guilty of criminal contempt for proceeding to-take part in the case and was summarily ordered suspended from practicing law in the “United States Court or any of its-agencies for one year.” Upon agreement by appellant to “go along” with the suspension order, sentence on the criminal' contempt finding was deferred by the-court. The record shows that appellant was under threat of a jail sentence at the time he agreed to “go along” with the order.

No notice of a hearing was given-appellant, nor did he have opportunity to defend against charges which could' cause his suspension from the federal bar. The Supreme Court has said: “Before a judgment disbarring an attorney is rendered he should have notice of the-grounds of complaint against him and an ample opportunity of explanation and' defense. This is a rule of natural justice, and should be equally followed when proceedings are taken to deprive him-of his right to practice his profession, as when they are taken to reach his real or personal property. And such has been the general, if not the uniform, practice-of the courts of this country and of England.” Ex parte Robinson, 19 Wall. 505, 86 U.S. 505, 512, 22 L.Ed. 205. See also, Laughlin v. Wheat, 68 App.D.C. 190, 95 F.2d 101.

*345Accordingly, the order suspending appellant from practicing for one year in ■federal courts and agencies must be set aside and the cause remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Considering the matter of contempt, the courts of appeals have jurisdiction only on appeals from final deci.sions of the district courts. Title 28, section 1291, U.S.C.A. As Chief Justice Hughes has said [Berman v. United States, 302 U.S. 211, 212, 58 S.Ct. 164, 166, 82 L.Ed. 204]: “Final judgment in *.a*criminal case means sentence. The .sentence is the judgment.” Miller v. Aderhold, 288 U.S. 206, 210, 53 S.Ct. 325, 77 L.Ed. 702; and Hill v. United States ex rel. Wampler, 298 U.S. 460, 464, 56 S.Ct. 760, 80 L.Ed. 1283, were cited. In the absence of a sentence on the criminal contempt finding, the decision lacks the finality which would allow this court to review it.