Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 152 / Monday, August 9, 2010 / Notices 47891 

comments on any aspect of this notice 

is welcomed from all interested public, 

private, and academic entities. While all 

feedback is welcomed, the DOT is 

particularly interested in feedback on 

the following questions. Respondents 

may respond, to some, all, or none of 

these specific questions. 

1. Based on the nature of the 

performance measurement 

demonstration(s), DOT believes that a 

multimodal cooperative effort involving 

both private sector and public sector 

organizations will be required. The DOT 

currently envisions awarding one or 

more contracts to private sector 

organization(s) as the lead 

organization(s) in partnership with 

public transportation agencies and other 

entities appropriate to develop and 

conduct the demonstration(s). An 

alternative would be to conduct a 

competitive grant program and award 

one or more grants to public sector 

organization(s) as the lead(s) 

organization, engaging and involving 

other entities as appropriate. Academic 

institutions are welcomed as team 

members; however, DOT does not 

envision an academic institution serving 

as the lead. Feedback is requested on 

these procurement options and issues 

including the challenges in forming the 

teams as either a lead organization or as 

a partner or other participant. What 

forms or demonstrations of commitment 

by the participants are reasonable and 

appropriate requirements of 

respondents to a solicitation for the 

performance measurement 

demonstration program? 

2. The DOT envisions the 

demonstration(s) awarded and 

commencing in early 2011, with the 

demonstration’s(s’) applications 

beginning operations approximately 6 

months of preparation and 

development. The operational period, 

results analysis, and publication of final 

results are anticipated to occur over a 

period that does not exceed 18 months. 

Is this schedule too cautious, too 

ambitious, or about right? 

3. Are the identified performance 

metrics the right ones to focus on? Are 

there metrics or applications that you 

would add or delete? 

4. The goals of this near-term dynamic 

mobility demonstration program are to 

demonstrate the use of IntelliDriveSM to 

improve the collection of performance 

measurement information, and to 

demonstrate the use of this information 

to support performance-based 

management, e.g., through the use of 

decision support tools. To what extent 

can the real-time or near real-time 

collection of performance measures be 

demonstrated, and to what extent can 

real-time or near real-time performancebased management applications or tools 

be demonstrated? 

5. There are important advantages to 

conducting a single demonstration, 

including concentration of resources 

and funding, ease of management, and 

demonstration of integrated applications 

running in a common environment. At 

the same time, the breadth of envisioned 

applications and the desire for a diverse 

operating environment argue for 

conducting a small number of smaller 

demonstrations. Is it feasible to address 

a majority (if not all) of the goals and 

environments in a single demonstration 

project? Can multiple meaningful, 

smaller demonstrations be conducted if 

the funding per demonstration is 

$1,000,000 or less? 

6. It is the intent to provide open 

access to the data collected as part of 

this demonstration through the 

IntelliDriveSM Data Capture and 

Management program. 

a. Do you see value in broadly sharing 

these data with other researchers? 

b. Will such data sharing inhibit 

participation in the demonstration? If 

so, what mitigation actions do you 

recommend to encourage participation? 

7. To the greatest extent possible, it is 

the intent of the Dynamic Mobility 

Applications Program to make 

algorithms and source code associated 

with new applications or applications 

enhancements funded as a part of these 

demonstrations to be made freely 

available under open source agreements. 

a. Do you see value in making 

algorithms and application source code 

funded by this demonstration program 

broadly available? 

b. Will an open source focus inhibit 

participation in the demonstration? If 

so, what mitigation actions do you 

recommend to encourage participation? 

Issued on: August 2, 2010. 

Victor M. Mendez, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2010–19534 Filed 8–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Intent to Rule on Request to 

Release Airport Property at the Dubois 

Regional Airport, Reynoldsville, 

Pennsylvania 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of request to release 

airport property. 

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and 

invite public comment on the release of 

land at the Dubois Regional Airport, 

Reynoldsville, Pennsylvania under the 

provisions of Section 47125(a) of Title 

49 United States Code (U.S.C.). 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before September 8, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Comments on this 

application may be mailed or delivered 

to the following address: 

Robert W. Shaffer, Manager, Dubois 

Regional Airport, 377 Aviation Way, 

Reynoldsville, PA 15851. 

and at the FAA Harrisburg Airports 

District Office: 

Lori K. Pagnanelli, Manager, Harrisburg 

Airports District Office, 3905 

Hartzdale Dr., Suite 508, Camp Hill, 

PA 17011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori 

Ledebohm, Community Planner, 

Harrisburg Airports District Office 

location listed above. 

The request to release property may 

be reviewed in person at this same 

location. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

invites public comment on the request 

to release property at the Dubois 

Regional Airport under the provisions of 

Section 47125(a) of Title 49 U.S.C. On 

July 30, 2010, the FAA determined that 

the request to release property at the 

Dubois Regional Airport submitted by 

the Clearfield-Jefferson Counties 

Regional Airport Authority (Authority) 

met the procedural requirements. 

The following is a brief overview of 

the request: 

The Authority requests the release of 

real property totaling 0.22 acre, of nonaeronautical airport property to Joseph 

and Rosemary Barber. Also, Joseph and 

Rosemary Barber desire to transfer real 

property totaling 0.02 acre to the 

Authority. The land was originally 

purchased with Federal funds in 1958, 

C.A.A Project 9–36–037–5801. The 

purpose for the change is to transfer 

land that was airport property but was 

used as Right-Of-Way (ROW) for State 

Route (SR) 830. SR 830 was relocated 

and one half of the ROW width was 

turned back to the Authority and the 

other half was turned back to Joseph 

and Rosemary Barber. The ROW 

continues to be needed by Joseph and 

Rosemary Barber to access SR 830 from 

their property. Therefore, the Authority 

desires to convey their half of the former 

ROW to Joseph and Rosemary Barber. 

Additionally, Joseph and Rosemary 

Barber wish to convey the small portion 

of land they obtained when SR 830 was 

relocated, back to the Authority. The 

property is located on the north-west 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
47892 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 152 / Monday, August 9, 2010 / Notices 

side of the airport and is bordered by 

the former airport access road and the 

Barber property. The subject land does 

not serve an aeronautical purpose and is 

not needed for airport development, as 

shown on the Airport Layout Plan. Any 

proceeds from the sale of property are 

to be used for the capital development 

of the airport. 

Any person may inspect the request 

by appointment at the FAA office 

address listed above. Interested persons 

are invited to comment on the proposed 

release from obligations. All comments 

will be considered by the FAA to the 

extent practicable. 

Issued in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, on 

August 2, 2010. 

Lori K. Pagnanelli, 

Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office. 

[FR Doc. 2010–19535 Filed 8–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request for Form 8893 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Treasury, as part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is 

soliciting comments concerning Form 

8893, Election of Partnership Level Tax 

Treatment. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before October 8, 2010 to 

be assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Gerald Shields, Internal Revenue 

Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for copies of the form and 

instructions should be directed to Elaine 

Christophe, (202) 622–3179, or at 

Internal Revenue Service, Room 6129, 

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20224, or through the 

Internet at Elaine.H.Christophe@irs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Election of Partnership Level 

Tax Treatment. 

OMB Number: 1545–1912. 

Form Number: 8893. 

Abstract: IRC section 6231(a)(1)(B)(ii) 

allows small partnerships to elect to be 

treated under the unified audit and 

litigation procedure. Form 8893 will 

allow IRS to better track these elections 

by providing a standardized format for 

this election. 

Current Actions: There are no changes 

being made to the form at this time. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

100. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 

hours, 27 minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 227. 

The following paragraph applies to all 

of the collections of information covered 

by this notice: 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless the collection of information 

displays a valid OMB control number. 

Books or records relating to a collection 

of information must be retained as long 

as their contents may become material 

in the administration of any internal 

revenue law. Generally, tax returns and 

tax return information are confidential, 

as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. 

Request for Comments: Comments 

submitted in response to this notice will 

be summarized and/or included in the 

request for OMB approval. All 

comments will become a matter of 

public record. Comments are invited on: 

(a) Whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden of the collection of 

information; (c) ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on respondents, including 

through the use of automated collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology; and (e) estimates of capital 

or start-up costs and costs of operation, 

maintenance, and purchase of services 

to provide information. 

Approved: July 30, 2010. 

Gerald Shields, 

IRS Supervisory Tax Analyst. 

[FR Doc. 2010–19491 Filed 8–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request for Form 3911 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Treasury, as part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is 

soliciting comments concerning Form 

3911, Taxpayer Statement Regarding 

Refund. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before October 8, 2010 to 

be assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Gerald Shields, Internal Revenue 

Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the form and instructions 

should be directed to Elaine Christophe, 

(202) 622–3179, or at Internal Revenue 

Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, 

or through the Internet, at 

Elaine.H.Christophe@irs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Taxpayer Statement Regarding 

Refund. 

OMB Number: 1545–1384. 

Form Number: 3911. 

Abstract: Form 3911 is used by 

taxpayers to notify the IRS that a tax 

refund previously claimed has not been 

received. The form is normally 

completed by the taxpayer as the result 

of an inquiry in which the taxpayer 

claims non-receipt, loss, theft or 

destruction of a tax refund, and IRS 

research shows that the refund has been 

issued. The information on the form is 

needed to clearly identify the refund to 

be traced. 

Current Actions: There are no changes 

being made to the form at this time. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households, business or other for-profit 

organizations, and not-for-profit 

institutions. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

200,000. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES