alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Rosie G. and Others, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Francis G., Appellant; Talbot Perkins Children’s Services et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent.

[698 NYS2d 637]

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about May 19, 1997, which, to the extent appealed from, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to the subject children and placed the children with the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner agency for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of permanent neglect against respondent mother was supported by clear and *convincing*evidence that respondent mother failed to plan for the children’s future, although physically and financially able to do so. Respondent mother failed to submit to random drug and alcohol testing, and to avail herself of counseling, which petitioner agency repeatedly encouraged and referred her to *(see,*Social Services Law § 384-b [7]; *Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368; *Matter of Juanita Katerina M.,*205 AD2d 474; *Matter of Selathia Nicole F.,*243 AD2d 400, *lv denied*91 NY2d 806). In making its permanent neglect finding, Family Court properly received in evidence, as business records, progress notes documenting respondent’s repeated refusal to cooperate with referrals for counseling and random drug and alcohol testing *(see, Matter of F. Children,*199 AD2d 81). Any delay in respondent mother’s receipt of the progress notes was harmless since she was provided with a complete copy of the notes prior to completion of her cross-examination of the testifying witness. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11760]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C. as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center of Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: May 19, 2000.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 9000 Rockville Pike, Bldg 31, Room 5B50, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: John C. Chah, Scientific Review Administrator, 
National Institutes of Health, NCCAM, Building 31, Room 5B50, 9000 
Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-4334, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1dbded9dfd2f1ded59fdfd8d99fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fe949196909dbe919ad0909796d0999188">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 3, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-11760 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Knot, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Mueller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ John P. MuellerJohn P. Mueller

Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 16, 2011
§ 23.2305 Landing gear systems. ( a ) The landing gear must be designed to— ( 1 ) Provide stable support and control to the airplane during surface operation; and
( 2 ) Account for likely system failures and likely operation environments (including anticipated limitation exceedances and emergency procedures).
( b ) All airplanes must have a reliable means of stopping the airplane with sufficient kinetic energy absorption to account for landing. Airplanes that are required to demonstrate aborted takeoff capability must account for this additional kinetic energy.
( c ) For airplanes that have a system that actuates the landing gear, there is— ( 1 ) A positive means to keep the landing gear in the landing position; and
( 2 ) An alternative means available to bring the landing gear in the landing position when a non-deployed system position would be a hazard.
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.309 Requests for hearing.

The Department will not normally conduct oral evidentiary hearings concerning applications for exemption. However, the Department may, in its discretion, order such a hearing on an application. Any applicant, or any person opposing an application, may request an oral evidentiary hearing. Such a request shall set forth in detail the reasons why the filing of affidavits or other written evidence will not permit the fair and expeditious disposition of the application. A request relying on factual assertions shall be accompanied by affidavits establishing such facts. If the Department orders an oral evidentiary hearing, the procedures in subpart A of this part shall apply.
#### Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, Appellant, *v.*Frederick Kraft et al., Respondents.

(Submitted October 19, 1936;

decided October 23, 1936.)

*Otto A. Samuels*for motion.

*Francis S. Bensel*and *W. Frederick Knecht*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00106-CR

Kerry FRANCO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR5990

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 4, 2012

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal by withdrawing his notice of appeal. 

The motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT 20 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-20 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Letter from Bishop to FOMB Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-20 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Letter from Bishop to FOMB Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-20 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Letter from Bishop to FOMB Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-20 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Letter from Bishop to FOMB Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-118]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


CDC Advisory Committee on HIV and STD Prevention: Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following committee meeting.

    Name: CDC Advisory Committee on HIV and STD Prevention.
    Time and Date: 8:30 a.m.-12 p.m., January 24, 2000.
    Place: Main National Academy of Sciences, 2101 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC.

    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-5 p.m., January 24, 2000.
    Place: Hotel Lombardy, International Conference Room, 291 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room at the Hotel Lombardy will accommodate 
approximately 32 people.
    Purpose: This Committee is charged with advising the Director, 
CDC, regarding objectives, strategies, and priorities for HIV and 
STD prevention efforts including maintaining surveillance of HIV 
infection, AIDS, and STDs, the epidemiologic and laboratory study of 
HIV/AIDS and STDs, information/education and risk reduction 
activities designed to prevent the spread of HIV and STDs, and other 
preventive measures that become available.
    Matters To Be Discussed: Agenda items include issues pertaining 
to evolving HIV prevention priorities. Agenda items are subject to 
change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Paulette Ford, Committee 
Management Analyst, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, 
1600 Clifton Road, NE, M/S E-07, Atlanta, Georgia 30333. Telephone 
404/639-8008, fax 404/639-8600, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8cfceeeabbccefe8efa2ebe3fa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5121333766113235327f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register Notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: December 21, 1999.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 00-118 Filed 01-04-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/d07b1474/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Louis Faulhaber, Appellant.

(Submitted September 28, 1936;

decided September 30, 1936.)

*501
      *Charles P.*Sullivan, *District Attorney (John H. W. Krogmann*of counsel), for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 10.11


 


SECOND AMENDMENT


TO THE


AGRILINK FOODS EXCESS BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN


 


This
Amendment is adopted by Birds Eye Foods, Inc., a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the general Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (sometimes referred to herein as the “Employer”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


WHEREAS,
the Employer had adopted the AGRILINK FOODS EXCESS BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN (the
“Plan”) which was amended and restated effective December 1, 2000, and


 


WHEREAS,
the Employer has reserved the right pursuant to the provisions of the Plan to
amend it at any time, and 


 


WHEREAS,  the Employer now wishes to amend the Plan,


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, said Plan is amended to change the name of the Plan to:


 


BIRDS EYE FOODS EXCESS BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN.


 


The
Plan is further amended to change all references therin from Agrilink Foods, Inc.
to Birds Eye Foods, Inc., except where the context may require otherwise.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed this 10th day of February 2003.


 


	
   

  	
  BIRDS
  EYE FOODS, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Lois 
  Warlick-Jarvie

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
  Vice President Human Resources
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11644]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3241]


State of Ohio; Amendment #1

    In accordance with information received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to 
extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damage as a 
result of this disaster from May 6, 2000 to May 8, 2000.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for economic injury is December 7, 2000.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: April 28, 2000.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-11644 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
OSS Training in the National Parks
and Service Abroad in World War II

John Whiteclay Chambers II



OSS Training in the National Parks
and Service Abroad in World War II

by

John Whiteclay Chambers II

US. National Park Service
Washington, D.C.
2008


To Those Who Served

Gold and Black Spearhead Insignia
Proposed by Donovan for the OSS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- MAY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q, 1ST QUARTER FISCAL 2000 -- LAROCHE INDUSTRIES INC.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,605
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (491)
<INVENTORY>                                     18,835
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,105
<PP&E>                                         315,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                (111,868)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          145,281
<BONDS>                                        201,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                     (12,010)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,809
<SALES>                                         90,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,615
<CGS>                                           81,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (565)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       993
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,558)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     181
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,377)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 415.121 Launch schedule.

An applicant's safety review document must contain a generic launch processing schedule that identifies each review, rehearsal, and safety critical preflight operation to be conducted as required by §§ 417.117, 417.119, and 417.121 of this chapter. The launch schedule must also identify day of flight activities. The launch processing schedule must show each of these activities referenced to liftoff, such as liftoff minus three days.
ERROR — PRACTICE.

[Pickaway Circuit Court,

November Term, 1898.]

Cherrington, Russell & Sibley, JJ.

#### Frederick Snyder v. Lucinda Wanamaker.

Review of Evidence Before Trial Court — How Accomplished.

Where the court of common pleas sets aside the settlement of a cause of action pending in such court, upon affidavits and parol testimony: *Held,*that in order to bring the evidence before the circuit court for review, it is necessary that a motion for a new trial should have been made and overruled in the court below, and thereupon a bill of exceptions taken, containing all the evidence.

Russell, J.

Wanamaker commenced an action against Snyder in the common pleas court, in which issues were joined. Pending the action, Snyder procured a settlement to be made and an entry, dismissing the case. Subsequently, at the same term in which the entry of dismissal was made, Wanamaker filed a motion to set aside the settlement and the entry thereof, on the ground that the settlement was procured by fraud and misrepresentation. The motion was heard on affidavits as well as upon parol testimony, and on consideration thereof, was sustained. Snyder excepted and took a bill of exceptions containing all the testimony, including the affidavits, but did not file a motion to set aside the order of the court vacating the settlement, and for a new trial, and thereupon filed a petition in error to the circuit court, alleging, among other grounds of error, that' the order of the court, in setting the settlement aside, was against the evidence.

On the hearing of the petition in error in the circuit court, defendant in error objected to the court considering the alleged error above stated, for the reason that in order to bring the evidence before the court for review, it was necessary that a motion for a new trial should have been made in the court below and overruled, and moved that the bill of exceptions be stricken from the petition in error. Objection and motion sustained.
Opinion filed July9, 20 09



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

___________ 

### No. 1 1- 08 -0 01 74 -CV

____ ____ __ DA N E DS WORT H GREER , A ppellant

V. DA VID THOM PS ON, Ap pellee On App eal from the 132nd District Court

Scurry County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 22912
M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N The pa rties have filed a joint motion asking this court to set aside the trial cour t’s judgme nt without reg ard to the me rits and t o re m an d the ca use for further considera

tion in the trial court consistent with the parties a g ree ment. The motion is gr anted. Pur su ant t o th e pa

rt ie s a g re e me nt, the jud g me nt of the tr ia l c ourt

is r e ve rs e d, and

the c a us e is remande d.
J uly 9, 2009 PER C URI AM Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , an d

S tr an g e , J.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11858]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

    (1) Collection title: Employment Representatives' Status and 
Compensation Reports.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: DC-2a, DC-2.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0014.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: 7/31/2000.
    (5) Type of request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Business or other-for-profit.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 65.
    (8) Total annual responses: 65.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 33.
    (10) Collection description: Benefits are provided under the 
Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) for individuals who are employee 
representatives as defined in section 1 of the RRA. The collection 
obtains information regarding the status of such individuals and their 
compensation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the forms and supporting 
documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance 
officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information collection 
should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, 
Joe Lackey (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, Room 10230, 
New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-11858 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.2  


 
 

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT    
  


        This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the annual
report on Form 20-F (the "Form 20-F") for the year ended December 31, 2002 of Preem Holdings AB (publ) (the "Issuer"). 


        I,
Per Höjgård the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that: 



          (i)  the
Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 


        (ii)  the
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer. 



	Dated:	April 30, 2003.	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/  PER HÖJGÅRD      
 Name:  Per Höjgård

Title:    Chief Financial Officer	 







        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Preem
Holdings AB (publ) (the "Company") and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 









QuickLinks


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
#### CHOCTAW NATION v. UNITED STATES

[81 C. Cls. 1; 296 U. S. 643]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court November 25, 1935.
December 2 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request for information dated November 25 , 2015 for docket number 

### FAA−2015−3513

.

We will not need to have the ability to perform closed set filming, we do not have a MPTOM (Motion Picture and Television

Operations Manual).

WE WISH TO PROCEED WITHOUT THIS MANUAL AND TO REMOVE CLOSED

- SET FILMING FROM OUR PROPOSED OPERATION.

Jonathan Caccamo (Our complete info is below)

The name and address of the applicant is:

X

- Flite Aerial LLC

. President Jonathan Caccamo ( jon@x

- flite.net , T : 225

- 939

- 8467 )

8154 Acadiana Ave

Denham Springs LA 70706

Additionally, the applicant will conduct all UAS operations under the d irect control or supervision of an FAA certificated

airman. The airman's certificate numbers will be forwarded to support this petition in a confidential document via post if

requested by the FAA. The name and address of that airman is as follows:

Pilot Name: Jonathan Caccamo

FAA Certificates held: Single Engine Land

. Address: 8154 Acadiana Ave Denha m Springs

, LA 70706