ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

40 CFR Ch. I 

[ 9134-3 ] 

EPA-HQ-OA-2007-1172 

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0169 

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0166

EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0052 

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0728 

Fall 2010 Regulatory Agenda 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. 

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory flexibility agenda and semiannual regulatory agenda. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publishes the semiannual regulatory agenda 

online (the e-Agenda) at www.reginfo.gov to update the public about: 

• Regulations and major policies currently under development, 

• Reviews of existing regulations and major policies, and 

• Rules and major policymakings completed or canceled since the last agenda. 

Definitions: 

 ‘‘E-Agenda,’’ ‘‘online regulatory agenda,’’ and ‘‘semiannual regulatory agenda’’ all refer to the same 

comprehensive collection of information that until 2007 was published in the Federal Register but which 

now is only available through an online database. 

 ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Agenda’’ refers to a document that contains information about regulations that 

may have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. It continues to be published in 

the Federal Register because that is what is required by the 1980 Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

 "Monthly Action Initiation List" (AIL) refers to a list that EPA posts online each month of the regulations 

newly approved for development. 

 ‘‘Unified Regulatory Agenda’’ refers to the collection of all agencies’ agendas with an introduction 

prepared by the Regulatory Information Service Center. 

 ‘‘Regulatory Agenda preamble’’ refers to the document you are reading now. It appears as part of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and introduces both the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and the e-Agenda. 

 “Rulemaking Gateway” refers to a new online portal to EPA’s priority rules with earlier and more 

frequently updated information about Agency regulations. More information about the Rulemaking 

Gateway appears in section H of this preamble.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions or comments about a particular 

action, please get in touch with the agency contact listed in each agenda entry. If you have general 

questions about the semiannual regulatory agenda, please contact: Phil Schwartz 

(schwartz.philip@epa.gov; 202-564-6564) or Caryn Muellerleile (muellerleile.caryn@epa.gov; 202-564-

2855). 

TO BE PLACED ON A MAILING LIST FOR UPDATED INFORMATION ON RULES UNDER 

DEVELOPMENT: If you would like to receive an e-mail with a link to new semiannual regulatory agendas 

as soon as they are published, please send an e-mail message with your name and address to: 

nscep@bps-lmit.com and put ‘‘E-Regulatory Agenda: Electronic Copy’’ in the subject line. 

 If you would like to regularly receive information about the rules newly approved for development, sign 

up for our monthly Action Initiation List by going to 

http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/search/ail.html#notification and completing the steps listed there. 

 You can track progress on various aspects of EPA’s priority rulemakings by signing up for RSS feeds 

from the Rulemaking Gateway at 

http://yosemite.epa.gov/opei/RuleGate.nsf/content/getalerts.html?opendocument. 

 If you would like to receive a hard copy of the semiannual agenda about 2 to 3 months after 

publication, call 800-490-9198 or send an e-mail with your name and complete address to: nscep@bpslmit.com and put ‘‘Regulatory Agenda Hard Copy’’ in the subject line. We are ending distribution of hard 

copies of the Agenda after the Fall 2010 edition. You will still, however, be able to download and print a 

Federal Register style version of the EPA’s Agenda at www.epa.gov/lawsregs/search/regagenda.html. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

A. Map of Regulatory Agenda Information 

B. What Are EPA’s Regulatory Goals and What Key Principles, Statutes, and Executive Orders Guide 

 Our Rule and Policymaking Process? 

C. How Can You Be Involved in EPA’s Rule and Policymaking Process? 

D. What Actions Are Included in the Regulatory Agenda? 

E. How Is the E-Agenda Organized? 

F. What Information Is in the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and the E-Agenda? 

G. How Can I Find Out About Rulemakings That Start Up After the Regulatory Agenda Is Signed? 

H. What Tools for Finding More About EPA Rules and Policies Are Available at EPA.gov, 

 Regulations.gov, and Reginfo.gov? 

I. Reviews of Rules With Significant Impacts on a Substantial Number of Small Entities 

J. What Other Special Attention Do We Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small Businesses, Small 

 Governments, and Small Nonprofit Organizations? 

K. Thank You for Collaborating With Us 

A. Map of Regulatory Agenda Type Information 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

2
Type of Information Online Locations Federal 

Register 

Location 

Semiannual Regulatory 

Agenda 

www.reginfo.gov/, www.regulations.gov, and 

http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/search/regagenda.html 

Not in FR 

FY 2011 Regulatory Plan Go to: Regulations.gov and put “EPA-HQ-OA-2010-0915-

0002” in the key word box 

Part II of 

today’s issue

Semiannual Regulatory 

Flexibility Agenda 

www.reginfo.gov/, www.regulations.gov, and 

http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/search/regagenda.html 

Part XII of 

today’s issue

Monthly Action Initiation 

List 

http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?m

ain=DocketDetail&d=EPA-HQ-OA-2008-0265 and 

http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/search/ail.html 

Not in FR 

Rulemaking Gateway www.epa.gov/rulemaking/ Not in FR 

B. What Are EPA’s Regulatory Priorities, and What Key Principles, Statutes, and Executive Orders 

Guide Our Rule and Policymaking Process? 

Priorities

 To guide the Agency’s efforts in 2011 and subsequent years, Administrator Lisa P. Jackson has 

established the following seven guiding principles. For a more extensive discussion of these principles 

please see our FY 2011 Regulatory Plan. 

 1. Taking Action on Climate Change: In 2009 EPA finalized an endangerment finding on 

greenhouse gases; issued the first national rules to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions under the Clean 

Air Act; and initiated a national reporting system for greenhouse gas emissions. In 2010, EPA and 

NHTSA announced a joint final rule establishing a historic national program that will dramatically reduce 

greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel economy for new cars and trucks sold in the United States. 

The mobile sources addressed in that regulatory action — light-duty vehicles and heavy-duty vehicles —

accounted for 23 percent of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2007. While EPA stands ready to help 

Congress craft strong, science-based climate legislation that addresses the spectrum of issues, the 

Agency will deploy existing regulatory tools as they are available and warranted. 

 2. Improving Air Quality: Since passage of the Clean Air Act Amendments in 1990, nationwide air 

quality has improved significantly for the six criteria air pollutants for which there are national ambient air 

quality standards. Despite this progress, about 127 million Americans lived in counties with air considered 

unhealthy in 2008. Long-term exposure to air pollution can cause cancer and damage to the immune, 

neurological, reproductive, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems. Because people spend much of their 

lives indoors, the quality of indoor air is also a major concern. 

 3. Assuring the Safety of Chemicals: One of EPA’s highest priorities is to make significant and long 

overdue progress in assuring the safety of chemicals. On September 29, 2009, Administrator Jackson 

announced clear principles to guide Congress in writing a new chemical risk management law that will fix 

the weaknesses in Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). EPA is shifting its focus to addressing highconcern chemicals and filling data gaps on widely-produced chemicals in commerce. 

 4. Cleaning Up Our Communities: In 2009, EPA accelerated its Superfund program and confronted 

significant local environmental challenges like the asbestos Public Health Emergency in Libby, Montana 

and the coal ash spill in Kingston, Tennessee. 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

3
 5. Protecting America’s Waters: America’s water bodies are imperiled as never before. Water 

quality and enforcement programs face complex challenges, from nutrient loadings and storm water 

runoff to invasive species and drinking water contaminants. These challenges demand both traditional 

and innovative strategies. 

 6. Expanding the Conversation on Environmentalism and Working for Environmental Justice:

Environmentalism has been described as a conversation that we all must have because it is about 

protecting people in the places they live, work, and raise families. The Agency is now focusing on 

expanding the conversation to include new stakeholders and involve communities in more direct ways. 

 7. Building Strong State and Tribal Partnerships: EPA's success depends more than ever on 

working with increasingly capable and environmentally conscious partners. The Agency works with the 

States and Tribes, business and industry, nonprofit organizations, environmental groups, and educational 

institutions in a wide variety of collaborative efforts. States and tribal nations bear important 

responsibilities for the day-to-day mission of environmental protection. 

Other Key Principles, Statutes, and Executive Orders Guiding Our Rule and Policymaking Process 

 EPA’s strength has always been our ability to adapt to the constantly changing face of environmental 

protection as our economy and society evolve, and science teaches us more about how humans interact 

with and affect the natural world. Now, more than ever, EPA must be innovative and forward looking 

because the environmental challenges faced by Americans all across our country are unprecedented. 

 Besides the fundamental environmental laws authorizing EPA actions such as the Clean Air Act and 

Clean Water Act, there are legal requirements that apply to the issuance of regulations that are generally 

contained in the Administrative Procedure Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act as amended by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, the Paperwork 

Reduction Act, the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act, and the Congressional Review 

Act. We also must meet a number of requirements contained in Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory 

Planning and Review; 58 FR 51735; October 4, 1993), 12898 (Environmental Justice; 59 FR 7629; 

February 16, 1994), 13045 (Children’s Health Protection; 62 FR 19885; April 23, 1997), 13132 

(Federalism; 64 FR 43255; August 10, 1999), 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments; 65 FR 67249; November 9, 2000), 13211 (Actions Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use; 66 FR 28355; May 22, 2001). 

C. How Can You Be Involved in EPA’s Rule and Policymaking Process? 

 You can make your voice heard by getting in touch with the contact person provided in each agenda 

entry. We urge you to participate as early in the process as possible. You may also participate by 

commenting on proposed rules that we publish in the Federal Register (FR). 

 Instructions on how to submit your comments are provided in each of our Notices of Proposed 

Rulemaking (NPRMs). To be most effective, comments should contain information and data that support 

your position, and you also should explain why we should incorporate your suggestion in the rule or 

nonregulatory action. You can be particularly helpful and persuasive if you provide examples to illustrate 

your concerns and offer specific alternatives. 

 We believe our actions will be more cost-effective and protective if our development process includes 

stakeholders working with us to identify the most practical and effective solutions to problems, and we 

stress this point most strongly in all of our training programs for rule and policy developers. Democracy 

gives real power to individual citizens, but with that power comes responsibility. We urge you to become 

involved in EPA’s rule and policymaking process. For more information about public involvement in EPA 

activities, please visit www.epa.gov/publicinvolvement. 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

4
D. What Actions Are Included in the E-Agenda and the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda? 

 EPA includes regulations and certain major policy documents in the e-Agenda. However, there is no 

legal significance to the omission of an item from the agenda, and we generally do not include the 

following categories of actions: 

• Administrative actions such as delegations of authority, changes of address, or phone numbers; 

• Under the Clean Air Act: Revisions to State Implementation Plans; Equivalent Methods for Ambient 

Air Quality Monitoring; Deletions from the New Source Performance Standards source categories list; 

Delegations of Authority to States; Area Designations for Air Quality Planning Purposes; 

• Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act: Registration-related decisions, actions 

affecting the status of currently registered pesticides, and data call-ins; 

• Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Actions regarding pesticide tolerances and food 

additive regulations; 

• Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act: Authorization of State solid waste management 

plans; hazardous waste delisting petitions; 

• Under the Clean Water Act: State Water Quality Standards; deletions from the section 307(a) list of 

toxic pollutants; suspensions of toxic testing requirements under the National Pollutant Discharge 

Elimination System (NPDES); delegations of NPDES authority to States; 

• Under the Safe Drinking Water Act: Actions on State underground injection control programs. 

 The Regulatory Flexibility Agenda normally includes: 

• Actions likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 

• Rules the Agency has identified for periodic review under section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

There are four rules for 610 reviews in 2010. 

E. How Is the E-Agenda Organized? 

 You can now choose how both the www.reginfo.gov and www.regulations.gov versions of the eAgenda are organized. Current choices include: EPA subagency; stage of rulemaking, explained below; 

alphabetically by title; and by the Regulation Identifier Number (RIN), which is assigned sequentially when 

an action is added to the agenda. 

 Stages of rulemaking include: 

1. Prerulemaking—Prerulemaking actions are generally intended to determine whether EPA should 

initiate rulemaking. Prerulemakings may include anything that influences or leads to rulemaking, such as 

Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRMs studies or analyses of the possible need for 

regulatory action, announcement of reviews of existing regulations required under section 610 of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act, requests for public comment on the need for regulatory action, or important 

preregulatory policy proposals). 

2. Proposed Rule—This section includes EPA rulemaking actions that are within a year of proposal 

(publication of Notices of Proposed Rulemakings (NPRMs)). 

3. Final Rule—This section includes rules that will be issued as a final rule within a year. 

4. Long-Term Actions—This section includes rulemakings for which the next scheduled regulatory action 

is after October 2011. We urge you to explore becoming involved even if an action is listed in the LongTerm category. By the time an action is listed in the Proposed Rules category you may have missed the 

opportunity to participate in certain public meetings or policy dialogues. 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

5
5. Completed Actions—This section contains actions that have been promulgated and published in the 

Federal Register since publication of the spring 2010. It also includes actions that EPA is no longer 

considering. If an action appears in the completed section, it will not appear in future agendas unless we 

decide to initiate action again, in which case it will appear as a new entry. EPA also announces the 

results of the Regulatory Flexibility Act section 610 reviews in this section of the agenda. 

F. What Information Is in the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and the E-Agenda? 

 Regulatory Flexibility Agenda entries include: 

Sequence Number, RIN, Title, Description, Statutory Authority, Section 610 Review, if applicable, 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required, Schedule, Contact Person. 

 E-Agenda entries include: 

Title: Titles for new entries (those that have not appeared in previous agendas) are preceded by a bullet 

(●). The notation ‘‘Section 610 Review’’ follows the title if we are reviewing the rule as part of our periodic 

review of existing rules under section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 610). 

Priority: Entries are placed into one of five categories described below. OMB reviews all significant rules 

including both of the first two categories, ‘‘economically significant’’ and ‘‘other significant.’’ 

Economically Significant: Under E.O. 12866, a rulemaking action that may have an annual effect on 

the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of 

the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, 

or tribal governments or communities. 

Other Significant: A rulemaking that is not economically significant but is considered significant for 

other reasons. This category includes rules that may: 

1. Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by 

another agency; 

2. Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or 

the rights and obligations of recipients; or 

3. Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or 

the principles in Executive Order 12866. 

Substantive, Nonsignificant: A rulemaking that has substantive impacts but is not Significant, Routine 

and Frequent, or Informational/Administrative/Other. 

Routine and Frequent: A rulemaking that is a specific case of a recurring application of a regulatory 

program in the Code of Federal Regulations (e.g., certain State Implementation Plans, National 

Priority List updates, Significant New Use Rules, State Hazardous Waste Management Program 

actions, and Tolerance Exemptions). If an action that would normally be classified Routine and 

Frequent is reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under E.O. 12866, then we would 

classify the action as either “Economically Significant” or “Other Significant.” 

Informational/Administrative/Other: An action that is primarily informational or pertains to an action 

outside the scope of E.O. 12866. 

 Also, if we believe that a rule may be “Major” as defined in the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 

801, et seq.) because it is likely to result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or 

meets other criteria specified in this law, we indicate this under the “Priority” heading with the statement 

“Major under 5 USC 801.” 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

6
Legal Authority: The sections of the United States Code (USC), Public Law (PL), Executive Order (EO), or 

common name of the law that authorizes the regulatory action. 

CFR Citation: The sections of the Code of Federal Regulations that would be affected by the action. 

Legal Deadline: An indication of whether the rule is subject to a statutory or judicial deadline, the date of 

that deadline, and whether the deadline pertains to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, a Final Action, or 

some other action. 

Abstract: A brief description of the problem the action will address. 

Timetable: The dates (and citations) that documents for this action were published in the Federal 

Register and, where possible, a projected date for the next step. Projected publication dates frequently 

change during the course of developing an action. The projections in the agenda are our best estimates 

as of the date we submit the agenda for publication. For some entries, the timetable indicates that the 

date of the next action is “to be determined.” 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Indicates whether EPA has prepared or anticipates that it will be 

preparing a regulatory flexibility analysis under section 603 or 604 of the RFA. Generally, such an 

analysis is required for proposed or final rules subject to the RFA that EPA believes may have a 

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 

Small Entities Affected: Indicates whether we expect the rule to have any effect on small businesses, 

small governments, or small nonprofit organizations. 

Government Levels Affected: Indicates whether we expect the rule to have any effect on levels of 

government and, if so, whether the governments are State, local, tribal, or Federal. 

Federalism Implications: Indicates whether the action is expected to have substantial direct effects on the 

States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. 

Unfunded Mandates: Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act generally requires an 

assessment of anticipated costs and benefits if a rule includes a mandate that may result in expenditures 

of more than $100 million in any one year by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by 

the private sector. If we expect to exceed this $100 million threshold, we note it in this section. 

Energy Impacts: Indicates whether the action is a significant energy action under E.O. 13211. 

International Trade Impacts: Indicates whether the action is likely to have international trade or 

investment effects, or otherwise be of international interest.

Agency Contact: The name, address, phone number, and e-mail address, if available, of a person who is 

knowledgeable about the regulation. 

Additional Information: Other information about the action including docket information. 

URLs: For some of our actions, we include the Internet addresses for reading copies of rulemaking 

documents, submitting comments on proposals, and getting more information about the rulemaking and 

the program of which it is a part. (Note: To submit comments on proposals, you can go to our electronic 

docket, which is at www.regulations.gov. Once there, follow the online instructions to access the docket 

and submit comments. A docket identification (ID) number will assist in the search for materials. We 

include this number in the additional information section of many of the agenda entries that have already 

been proposed.) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

7
RIN: The Regulation Identifier Number is used by OMB to identify and track rulemakings. The first four 

digits of the RIN stand for the EPA office with lead responsibility for developing the action. 

G. How Can I Find Out About Rulemakings That Start Up After the Regulatory Agenda Is Signed? 

 EPA posts monthly information of new rulemakings that the Agency’s senior managers have decided 

that we should develop. We also distribute this list via e-mail. You can see the current list, which we call 

the Action Initiation List at http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/search/ail.html where you will also find 

information about how to get an e-mail notification when a new list is posted. 

H. What Tools for Mining Regulatory Agenda Data and for Finding More About EPA Rules and 

Policies Are Available at Reginfo.gov, EPA.gov, and Regulations.gov? 

1. The http://www.reginfo.gov/ Searchable Database 

The Regulatory Information Service Center and Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs have 

revised a Federal regulatory dashboard and continue to allow users to view the Regulatory Agenda 

database (http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain), which includes powerful search, display, 

and data transmission options. At that site you can: 

1. See the preamble. At the URL listed above for the Unified Agenda and Regulatory Plan, find 

“Current Agenda Agency Preambles.” Environmental Protection Agency is listed alphabetically 

under “Other Executive Agencies.” 

2. Get a complete list of EPA’s entries in the current edition of the Agenda. Use the drop-down 

menu in the “Select Agency” box to find Environmental Protection Agency and “Submit.” 

3. View the contents of all of EPA’s entries in the current edition of the Agenda. Choose “Search” 

from the “Unified Agenda” selection in the toolbar at the top of the page. Within the “Search of 

Agenda/Regulatory Plan” screen, open “Advanced Search,” then “Continue.” Select 

“Environmental Protection Agency” and “Continue.” Select “Search,” then “View All RIN Data 

(Max 350).” 

4. Get a listing of entries with specified characteristics. Follow the procedure described immediately 

above for viewing the contents of all entries, but on the screen entitled “Advanced Search – 

Select Additional Fields,” choose the characteristics you are seeking before “Search.” For 

example, if you wish to see a listing of all economically significant actions that may have a 

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses, you would check 

“Economically Significant” under “Priority” and “Business” under “Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

Required.” 

5. Download the results of your searches in XML format. 

2. Subject Matter EPA Websites 

 Some actions listed in the Agenda include a URL that provides additional information. 

3. Public Dockets 

When EPA publishes either an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) or a NPRM in 

the Federal Register, the Agency typically establishes a docket to accumulate materials throughout 

the development process for that rulemaking. The docket serves as the repository for the collection of 

documents or information related to a particular Agency action or activity. EPA most commonly uses 

dockets for rulemaking actions, but dockets may also be used for Regulatory Flexibility Act section 

610 reviews of rules with significant economic impacts on a substantial number of small entities and 

for various nonrulemaking activities, such as Federal Register documents seeking public comments 

on draft guidance, policy statements, information collection requests under the Paperwork Reduction 

Act, and other non-rule activities. Docket information should be in that action’s agenda entry. All of 

EPA’s public dockets can be located at www.regulations.gov.

4. EPA’s Rulemaking Gateway 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

8
EPA’s Rulemaking Gateway (www.epa.gov/rulemaking/) serves as a portal to EPA’s priority rules, 

providing you with earlier and more frequently updated information about Agency regulations than is 

provided by the Regulatory Agenda. 

The Rulemaking Gateway provides information as soon as work begins and provides updates on a 

monthly basis as new information becomes available. Time-sensitive information, such as notice of a 

public meeting, is updated on a daily basis. Not all of EPA’s Regulatory Agenda entries appear on 

the Rulemaking Gateway; only priority rulemakings can be found on the Gateway. 

I. Reviews of Rules With Significant Impacts on a Substantial Number of Small Entities 

 Section 610 of the RFA requires that an agency review, within 10 years of promulgation, each rule that 

has or will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. EPA has four 

rules scheduled for 610 review in 2010. 

Rule Being Reviewed RIN Docket ID # 

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: 

Radionuclides (Section 610 Review) 2040-AF19 EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0166 

Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Centralized 

Waste Treatment Industry (Section 610 Review) 2040-AF18 EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0169 

Tier II Light-Duty Vehicle and Light-Duty Truck 

Emission Standards and Gasoline Sulfur Standards 

(Section 610 Review) 

2060-AQ12 EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0052 

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Arsenic 

and Clarifications to Compliance and New Source 

Contaminants Monitoring (Section 610 Review) 

2040-AF24 EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0728 

 EPA has established official public dockets for these 610 Reviews under the docket identification (ID) 

numbers as indicated above. All documents in the dockets are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available; e.g., confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, 

such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov 

or in hard copy at the applicable program (Water or Air) docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 

Reading Room is (202) 566-1744. Unless otherwise indicated, please direct your comments to the 

identified docket ID number for the specific 610 Review item. For these 610 Reviews, please DO NOT 

submit CBI or information that is otherwise protected by statute. You may submit comments using one of 

the following methods: 

1. Electronically. Go directly to www.regulations.gov and find “Advanced Docket Search.” Enter the 

appropriate docket ID number. The system is an “anonymous access” system, which means EPA will not 

know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact information unless you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you do submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name, 

mailing address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in the body of your comment. EPA’s 

policy is that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information provided in the 

body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket and 

made available in EPA’s electronic public docket.

2. By Mail. Send your comments to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency, 

Docket # [insert applicable docket number], 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460. 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

9
3. By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments, identified by the Docket # [insert applicable 

docket number], to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue 

NW., Washington, DC 20460. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading 

Room is (202) 566-1744. Such deliveries are only accepted during the docket center’s normal hours of 

operation as identified above. For more information on EPA’s docket center, please visit 

http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

 Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments 

received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” EPA is not required to consider 

these late comments. For this action, please DO NOT submit CBI or information that is otherwise 

protected by statute. 

J. What Other Special Attention Do We Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small Businesses, Small 

Governments, and Small Nonprofit Organizations? 

 For each of our rulemakings, we consider whether there will be any adverse impact on any small 

entity. We attempt to fit the regulatory requirements, to the extent feasible, to the scale of the businesses, 

organizations, and governmental jurisdictions subject to the regulation. 

 Under RFA/SBREFA (the Regulatory Flexibility Act as amended by the Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act), the Agency must prepare a formal analysis of the potential negative impacts 

on small entities, convene a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel (proposed rule stage), and prepare 

a Small Entity Compliance Guide (final rule stage) unless the Agency certifies a rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. For more detailed information about 

the Agency’s policy and practice with respect to implementing RFA/SBREFA, please visit the 

RFA/SBREFA Web site at http://www.epa.gov/sbrefa/. 

 For a list of the rules under development for which a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis will be required, go 

to http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=UnifiedAgenda.

K. Thank You for Collaborating With Us 

 Finally, we would like to thank those of you who choose to join with us in making progress on the 

complex issues involved in protecting human health and the environment. Collaborative efforts such as 

EPA’s open rulemaking process are a valuable tool for addressing the problems we face, and the 

regulatory agenda is an important part of that process. 

Dated: September 10, 2010 

NAME: Louise Wise, 

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation. 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

10
The 345 Regulatory Agendas

Regional Office Dallas - Proposed Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Oklahoma Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) 2006-AA00

Regional Office San Francisco - Final Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Regulation To Establish No Discharge Zone in California State Waters Under CWA 312(f)(4)(A) 2009-AA04

Office of General Council - Proposed Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Revision of Procedural Rules for Hearings on Cancellations, Suspensions, Changes in Classifications, and Denials of

Pesticide Registrations 2015-AA00

Office of General Council - Final Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Environmental Protection Agency 2015-AA01

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance - Proposed Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule 2020-AA47

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance - Long-term Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Technical Corrections to Title 40 To Conform to the Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule 2020-AA49

Office of Environmental Information - Proposed Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Clarify TRI Reporting Obligations Under EPCRA Section 313 for Metal Mining Activities 2025-AA11

TRI; Response to Petition To Delete Acetonitrile From the Toxics Release Inventory List of Toxic Chemicals 2025-AA19

Office of Environmental Information - Final Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Articles Exemption Clarification Rule 2025-AA24

TRI: Intent to Consider Lifting Administrative Stay Regarding Hydrogen Sulfide Reporting Requirements; Opportunity for

Public Comment 2025-AA27

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

11
Office of Environmental Information - Long-term Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

TRI; Response to Petition To Delete Chromium, Antimony, Titanate From the Metal Compound Categories Listed on the

Toxics Release Inventory 2025-AA16

TRI; Response to Petition To Add Diisononyl Phthalate to the Toxics Release Inventory List of Toxic Chemicals 2025-AA17

Office of Environmental Information - Completed Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Toxics Release Inventory; Addition of National Toxicology Program Carcinogens 2025-AA28

Water - PreRule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Centralized Waste Treatment Industry 2040-AF18

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Arsenic and Clarifications to Compliance and New Source Contaminants

Monitoring 2040-AF24

Water - Proposed Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

NPDES Permit Requirements for Municipal Sanitary and Combined Sewer Collection Systems, Municipal Satellite

Collection Systems, Sanitary Sewer Overflows, and Peak Excess Flow Treatment Facilities 2040-AD02

Regulations for Gray and Black Water Discharges From Cruise Ships Operating in Certain Alaskan Waters 2040-AD89

Criteria and Standards for Cooling Water Intake Structures 2040-AE95

Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation (UCMR 3) for Public Water Systems 2040-AF10

Amendment to Effluent Guidelines for Primary Aluminum Smelting Subcategory of the Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing

Point Source Category 2040-AF12

Stormwater Regulations Revision To Address Discharges From Developed Sites 2040-AF13

Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications 2040-AF16

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Regulations for New Dischargers and the Appropriate

Use of Offsets With Regard to Water Quality Permitting 2040-AF17

Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Estuaries and Coastal Waters 2040-AF21

Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) Information Collection Request Rule 2040-AF22

Withdrawal of Certain Federal Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria Applicable to Wisconsin 2040-AF23

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Application and Program Updates Rule 2040-AF25

Water - Final Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Use of Sufficiently Sensitive Test Methods for Permit

Applications and Reporting 2040-AC84

Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Airport Deicing Operations 2040-AE69

Federal Requirements Under the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program for Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Geologic

Sequestration (GS) Wells 2040-AE98

2010 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan 2040-AF06

Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; Analysis and

Sampling Procedures 2040-AF09

Water Quality Standards (Numeric Nutrient Criteria) for Florida's Lakes and Flowing Waters 2040-AF11

Water - Long-term Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

12
Number

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Radon 2040-AA94

Shore Protection Act, Section 4103(b) Regulations 2040-AB85

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Aldicarb 2040-AC13

Test Procedures for the Analysis of Co-Planar and Mono-Ortho-Substituted Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Under the

Clean Water Act 2040-AD09

Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces—Phase II 2040-AD39

Underground Injection Control: Update of State Programs 2040-AD40

National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR): Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) and Technical

Corrections to the NSDWR 2040-AD54

Statement of Policy -- NPDES Permit Requirements for Peak Wet Weather Discharges From Publicly Owned Treatment

Work Treatment Plants Serving Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems 2040-AD87

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule 2040-AD94

Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Chlorine and Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Manufacturing Process 2040-AE82

Development of Best Management Practices for Recreational Boats Under Section 312(o) of the Clean Water Act 2040-AF03

Oil and Gas Construction Stormwater Rule 2040-AF05

Perchlorate Regulatory Determination 2040-AF08

Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category 2040-AF14

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Regulatory Revisions 2040-AF15

Revised Regulations for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed 2040-AF20

Water - Completed Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Guidance for Implementing the Methylmercury Water Quality Criterion 2040-AE87

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Radionuclides 2040-AF19

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Proposed Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

National Priorities List for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites: Proposed and Final Rules 2050-AD75

Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act: Modification to the Threshold Planning Quantity Methodology

for the Extremely Hazardous Substances That Are Solids in Solution 2050-AF08

Revising Underground Storage Tank Regulations--Revisions to Existing Requirements and Additions To Incorporate the

Provisions of the Energy Policy Act 2050-AG46

Financial Responsibility Requirements Under CERCLA Section 108(b) for Facilities in the Chemical, Petroleum and

Electric Power Industries 2050-AG56

Hazardous Waste Management Systems: Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste: Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Injectate

in Geological Sequestration Activities 2050-AG60

Financial Responsibility Requirements Under CERCLA Section 108(b) for Classes of Facilities in the Hard Rock Mining

Industry 2050-AG61

Hazardous Chemical Reporting; Community Right-To-Know: Revisions to the Emergency and Hazardous Chemical

Inventory Forms (Tier I and Tier II) 2050-AG64

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Final Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Wastes 2050-AG44

Oil Pollution Prevention: Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Rule Requirements--Amendments for Milk

Containers 2050-AG50

Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections and Clarifications Rule 2050-AG52

Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste; Removing Saccharin and Its

Salts From the Lists of Hazardous Constituents, Hazardous Wastes, and Hazardous Substances 2050-AG55

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Long-term Action

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

13
Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

RCRA Subtitle C Financial Test Criteria Regulatory Determination 2050-AC71

Revisions to the Comprehensive Guideline for Procurement of Products Containing Recovered Materials 2050-AE23

Management of Cement Kiln Dust (CKD) 2050-AE34

Modifications to RCRA Rules Associated With Solvent-Contaminated Industrial Wipes 2050-AE51

Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Residuals Generated by Commercial Electric Power Producers 2050-AE81

Revisions to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; Subpart J Product Schedule

Listing Requirements 2050-AE87

RCRA Smarter Waste Reporting 2050-AF01

Correction of Errors and Adjustment of CERCLA Reportable Quantities 2050-AF03

Hazardous Waste Manifest Revisions—Standards and Procedures for Electronic Manifests 2050-AG20

National Contingency Plan Revisions To Align With the National Response Plan 2050-AG22

Revisions to Land Disposal Restrictions Treatment Standards and Amendments to Recycling Requirements for Spent

Petroleum Refining Hydrotreating and Hydrorefining Catalysts 2050-AG34

Amendment to the Universal Waste Rule: Addition of Pharmaceuticals 2050-AG39

Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act: Amendments and Streamlining Rule 2050-AG40

Standards for the Safe and Environmentally Protective Placement of Coal Combustion Residuals as Minefill in Coal

Mines Not Regulated Under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 2050-AG45

Episodic Generation Rulemaking 2050-AG51

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Completed Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act; Availability of

Information to the Public; Technical Amendment 2050-AE95

Identifying the Universe of Government Research in Laboratories and Determining Student Involvement in Generating

Laboratory Hazardous Waste 2050-AG54

Withdrawal of Expansion of RCRA Comparable Fuels Exclusion 2050-AG57

Revise: Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts for Superfund Response Actions 2050-AG58

SPCC Compliance Date Extension 2050-AG59

Temporary Suspension of Certain Oil Spill Response Time Requirements to Support Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill of

National Significance (SONS) Response 2050-AG63

Air and Radiation - PreRule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review Under CAA Section 111(b)(1)(B) 2060-AO60

Air and Radiation - Proposed Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Technical Change to Dose Methodology 2060-AH90

Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide 2060-AI43

National VOC Emission Standards for Consumer Products; Amendments 2060-AI62

Performance-Based Measurement System For Fuels: Criteria For Self-Qualifying Alternative Test Methods; Description

of Optional Statistical Quality Control Measures 2060-AK03

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amendments to the Section 608 Leak Repair Regulations 2060-AM09

NESHAP: Defense Land Systems and Miscellaneous Equipment 2060-AM84

Implementing Periodic Monitoring in Federal and State Operating Permit Programs 2060-AN00

Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Small Municipal

Waste Combustors: Remand Response and Amendments 2060-AN17

NESHAP: Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production, Amendments 2060-AN33

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

14
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amending Requirements To Import Ozone-Depleting Substances for Destruction in

the U.S. 2060-AN48

NESHAP: Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants—Amendments 2060-AN99

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) Operations—

Amendment 2060-AO03

Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds—Exclusion of Family of Four Hydrofluoropolyethers (HFPEs) and

HFE-347pc-f 2060-AO17

Response to Request for Reconsideration of Final Air Emission MACT Rules for Large Municipal Waste Combustors

(MWCs). 2060-AO18

Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter 2060-AO47

Measurement of PM 2.5 and PM 10 Emissions by Dilution Sampling 2060-AO50

Plywood and Composite Wood Products (PCWP) NESHAP—Proposed & Final Amendments to Address "No Emission

Reduction" MACT Floors 2060-AO66

Adoption of International NOx Standard for Aircraft Engines 2060-AO70

Review of the Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur 2060-AO72

NESHAP: Reinforced Plastic Composites Production Rule Amendments 2060-AP05

New Source Performance Standards for Grain Elevators—Amendments 2060-AP06

Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Test Methods (Alternative Test Method for Olefins in

Gasoline) 2060-AP17

Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds—Exclusion of Methyl Iodide 2060-AP22

Implementation of the 2010 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone, Waiver of Stage II Vapor Recovery

Requirements and Anti-Backsliding Requirements for the Section 185 Fee Program 2060-AP24

NESHAP Subpart W: Standards for Radon Emissions From Operating Uranium Mill Tailings: Review 2060-AP26

NSPS Equipment Leaks (Subpart VV SOCMI and GGG Petroleum Refineries); Amendments 2060-AP34

In-Use Emissions Testing for Nonroad Diesel Engines and Amendments to General Compliance Provisions for Nonroad

Engines 2060-AP41

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units 2060-AP52

Control of Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicles 2060-AP61

Emissions Factors Program Improvements 2060-AP63

Alternative Work Practices for Leak Detection and Repair, Amendments 2060-AP66

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reasonable Possibility in

Recordkeeping; Reconsideration 2060-AP71

Proposal to Revise the Interpollutant Trading Policy for PM2.5 Offsets 2060-AP72

Oil and Natural Gas Sector—New Source Performance Standards, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants, and Control Techniques Guidelines 2060-AP76

NESHAP Standard Standards for Petroleum Refineries—Heat Exchangers 2060-AP84

Federal Reference Method for Lead in Total Suspended Particulate Matter 2060-AP89

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2011 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide 2060-AP92

Revision of New Source Performance Standards for New Residential Wood Heaters 2060-AP93

National VOC Emission Standards for Architectural Coatings; Amendments 2060-AP94

Malfunction Amendments to Part 63 Standards 2060-AP96

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Elemental Phosphorous Production 2060-AP97

Revisions to Test Methods and Testing Regulations 2060-AQ01

Determination of Confidential Business Information Collected Under the GHG Mandatory Reporting Program 2060-AQ04

Revisions to In-Use Testing for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles; Emissions Measurement and Instrumentation;

Not-to-Exceed Emission Standards; and Technical Amendments for Off-Highway Engines 2060-AQ05

RACT Issues for Implementation of the 1997 PM2.5 and Ozone NAAQS 2060-AQ07

Review of New Source Performance Standards for Nitric Acid Plants—Subpart G 2060-AQ10

Regulation to Prevent the Misfueling of Vehicles and Engines With Gasoline Containing Greater Than Ten Volume

Percent Ethanol and Modifications to the Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline Programs 2060-AQ17

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review for Petroleum Refineries (Subpart J)—Response to

Reconsideration—Other Issues 2060-AQ28

Stationary Combustion Turbine NSPS Amendments to Address UARG Reconsideration Petition 2060-AQ29

New Source Performance Standards for Electric Utility and Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units 2060-AQ37

Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds—Exclusion of trans 1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene and 2,3,3,3-

tertrafluoropropene 2060-AQ38

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

15
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Extension of Global Laboratory and Analytical Use Exemption for Essential Class I

Ozone Depleting Substances 2060-AQ39

NESHAP Risk and Technology Review for Pulp and Paper Industry and Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources, and

NSPS Review for Kraft Pulp Mills 2060-AQ41

Risk and Technology Review NESHAP for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) and Wood Furniture

Manufacturing 2060-AQ42

Residual Risk and Technology Review: Primary Lead Smelting 2060-AQ43

Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead 2060-AQ44

Direct Final Amending Monitoring Requirements of the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Steam

Generating Units 2060-AQ46

Reconsideration of the Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions in the Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment

New Source Review 2060-AQ47

Revision to the Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule 2060-AQ48

Air and Radiation - Final Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems 2060-AH23

Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country 2060-AH37

Inspection/Maintenance Program Requirements for Federal Facilities; Amendment to the Final Rule 2060-AI97

Modification of the Anti-Dumping Baseline Date Cut-Off Limit for Data Used in Development of an Individual Baseline 2060-AJ82

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances: N-Propyl Bromide 2060-AK26

NESHAP: General Provisions; Amendments for Pollution Prevention Alternative Compliance Requirements 2060-AK54

Anti-Dumping Baseline Recalculation for Downstream Oxygenate Addition 2060-AK69

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional

Boilers 2060-AM44

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes in the Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Sector Under the

Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program 2060-AM54

Component Durability Procedures for New Light Duty Vehicles, Light Duty Trucks & Heavy Duty Vehicles 2060-AN01

Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units; Response to Remand of New Source Performance Standards

and Emission Guidelines 2060-AO12

Revision of Hearing—Protector Regulations 2060-AO25

Amendment of Definitions for National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Pollutants for Radionuclides, Subparts H and

I 2060-AO31

Addition of Method 208, Protocol for the Source Testing, Analysis, and Reporting of VOC Emissions From Hot Mix

Asphalt Plant Dryers 2060-AO51

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Appendix A—Test Methods; Amendments to Method 301 2060-AO53

Methods for Measurement of Filterable PM10 and PM2.5 and Measurement of Condensable Particulate Matter

Emissions From Stationary Sources 2060-AO58

NESHAP: Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks; Group I Polymers and Resins; Marine Tank Vessel

Loading Operations; Pharmaceuticals Production; Printing and Publishing; and Steel Picklin 2060-AO91

Implementation of the 1997 8-Hr Ozone NAAQS: Classification of Subpart 1 Areas and Revision to Anti-Backsliding

Provisions; Deletion of Obsolete 1-Hr Ozone Standard Provisions. 2060-AO96

Revisions to Test Method for Determining Stack Gas Velocity Taking Into Account Velocity Decay Near the Stack Walls 2060-AP08

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: New Substitute in the Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Sector Under the Significant

New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program 2060-AP11

Waste Energy Recovery Registry 2060-AP14

Ambient Ozone Monitoring Regulations: Revisions to Network Design Requirements 2060-AP15

NESHAP: Gasoline Distribution; Amendments—Area Source Standard 2060-AP16

Restructuring of the Stationary Source Audit Program 2060-AP23

Implementation of the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard: NSR Anti-Backsliding 2060-AP30

Air Quality Designations and Classifications for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards 2060-AP37

National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Gold Mine Ore Processing 2060-AP48

Transport Rule (CAIR Replacement Rule) 2060-AP50

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances-Hydrocarbon Refrigerants 2060-AP54

Transportation Conformity Rule Restructuring Amendments 2060-AP57

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

16
Clean Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Engine Conversions 2060-AP64

Compression Ignition Engine NSPS—Amendments 2060-AP67

Implementation of the New Source Review Program for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers--Repeal of

Grandfathering Provision and End Early the PM10 Surrogate Policy 2060-AP75

Revision to Pb Ambient Air Monitoring Requirements 2060-AP77

Reconsideration of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review NSR: Aggregation 2060-AP80

Carbon Dioxide Injection and Geologic Sequestration Reporting Rule 2060-AP88

NSPS/Emission Guidelines (EG) for Sewage Sludge Incinerators 2060-AP90

Reconsideration of the 2008 Ozone Primary and Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards 2060-AP98

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule 2060-AP99

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule for Additional Sources of Fluorinated GHGs 2060-AQ00

Corporate Parent and NAICS Code in the Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting Rule Requirements 2060-AQ02

Amendments to the Protocol Gas Verification Program, and Minimum Competency Requirements for Air Emission

Testing 2060-AQ06

Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits Under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of

Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Finding of Substantial Inadequacy and SIP Call 2060-AQ08

Revisions to Motor Vehicle Fuel Economy Label 2060-AQ09

2011 Renewable Fuel Volume Standards as Required by Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) 2060-AQ16

Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources:

Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators; Amendments 2060-AQ24

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional

Boilers and Process Heaters 2060-AQ25

Remaining Air Quality Designations for the 2006 24-Hour Fine Particle National Ambient Air Quality Standards 2060-AQ30

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Modifications to Renewable Fuel Standard Program 2060-AQ31

Revision of Certain Provisions of the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule 2060-AQ33

Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other Amendments to Certain Provisions of the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas

Reporting Rule 2060-AQ34

Supplemental Determinations for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Palm Oil 2060-AQ36

Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits Under the "Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of

Greenhouse Gas Emissions" Federal Implementation Plan 2060-AQ45

Supplemental Determination for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Pulpwood 2060-AQ49

Performance Specification 4C—Specifications and Test Procedures for Low-Level Carbon Monoxide Continuous

Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources 2060-AQ51

Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other Amendments to Certain Provisions of the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas

Reporting Rule 2060-AQ53

Air and Radiation - Long-term Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

NSPS: SOCMI--Wastewater and Amendments 2060-AE94

Performance Specifications for Continuous Parameter Monitoring Systems 2060-AJ86

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Combustion Turbines—Petition To Delist 2060-AK73

Petition to Delist Hazardous Air Pollutant: 4,4'-Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate 2060-AK84

Lifting the Stay of the Eight-Hour Portion of the Findings of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Purposes of

Reducing Interstate Ozone Transport ("NOx SIP Call") 2060-AL84

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting Emergency Uses of Methyl Bromide 2060-AL94

NSPS for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills 2060-AM08

Petition to Delist a Hazardous Air Pollutant From Section 112 of the Clean Air Act: Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (MIBK) 2060-AM20

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Certification of Recovery and Recovery/Recycling Equipment Intended for Use With

Substitute Refrigerants 2060-AM49

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Modifications to the Technician Certification Requirements Under Section 608 of the

Clean Air Act 2060-AM55

NESHAP: General Provisions (Once In Always In)—Amendments 2060-AM75

NESHAP: Taconite Iron Ore Processing; Amendments 2060-AM87

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Revision to Listing of Carbon Dioxide Total Flooding Fire Extinguishing Systems

Restricting Use to Only Unoccupied Areas 2060-AN30

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

17
NESHAP: Site Remediation Amendments—Response to Litigation 2060-AN36

Federal Plan Requirements for Other Solid Waste Incineration Units Constructed on or Before December 9, 2004 2060-AN43

Requirements for Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) Under the 8-Hour Ozone Standard for Bump-Up Areas Designated

Attainment for the 1-Hour Ozone Standard Prior to Revocation 2060-AN63

Petroleum Refineries—New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)—Subparts J and Ja 2060-AN72

Improving Implementation of the Operating Permit Rules in Response to CAAA Committee Recommendations 2060-AN93

NESHAP: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing—Amendments 2060-AO07

Petroleum Refinery Residual Risk Standards 2060-AO55

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Labeling of Products Using HCFCs 2060-AO68

Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone: Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning System Servicing 2060-AO75

Risk and Technology Review Phase II Group 3 2060-AO97

Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes 2060-AP00

Remand of Halogenated Solvent Cleaning Final Residual Risk Rule 2060-AP07

Response to Section 126 Petition From Warrick County, Indiana and the Town of Newburgh, Indiana 2060-AP21

NESHAP: Group I and IV Polymers and Resins: Amendments 2060-AP25

Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone 2060-AP38

Revision: Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings and Uranium In Situ

Leaching Processing Facilities 2060-AP43

Response to Section 126 Petition From North Carolina 2060-AP51

Response to Section 126 Petition From Delaware 2060-AP60

Implementing the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS: Section 185 Penalty Fee Provisions 2060-AP68

NESHAP: Brick and Structural Clay Products and Clay Products 2060-AP69

Lead Emissions From Piston-Engine Aircraft Using Leaded Aviation Gasoline 2060-AP79

Risk and Technology Review for Ferroalloys Production 2060-AQ11

Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Phosphoric Acid and Phosphate Fertilizer Production

NESHAPs 2060-AQ20

Method 16C for the Determination of Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions From Stationary Sources 2060-AQ23

Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Secondary Aluminum Production NESHAP 2060-AQ40

Air and Radiation - Completed Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Revisions to the General Conformity Regulations 2060-AH93

Evaluation of Updated Test Procedures for the Certification of Gasoline Deposit Control Additives 2060-AJ61

Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicle Engines: SAFETEA-LU HOV Facilities Rule 2060-AN68

NESHAP: Portland Cement Notice of Reconsideration and NSPS for Portland Cement 2060-AO15

Prevention of Significant Deterioration for PM2.5—Increments, Significant Impact Levels, and Significant Monitoring

Concentrations 2060-AO24

Control of Emissions From New Marine Compression—Ignition Engines At or Above 30 Liters per Cylinder 2060-AO38

Review of New Source Performance Standards—Portland Cement 2060-AO42

Review of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide 2060-AO48

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Alternative Affirmative Defense Requirements for Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel and

Gasoline Benzene Technical Amendment 2060-AO71

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chromium Electroplating, Chromium Anodizing, and Steel

Pickling Residual Risk and Technology Review 2060-AO92

Transportation Conformity PM2.5 and PM10 Amendments 2060-AP29

EPA/NHTSA Joint Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average

Fuel Economy Standards 2060-AP58

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Allocation of Essential Use Allowances for Calendar Year 2010 2060-AP59

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2010 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide 2060-AP62

Air Quality Designations for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards 2060-AP78

Prevention of Significant Deterioration/Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule 2060-AP86

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

18
Requirements for Control Technology Determinations for Major Sources in Accordance With Clean Air Act Sections,

Sections 112(g) and 112(j) 2060-AP91

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Group I Polymers and Resins 2060-AP95

Regulation To Establish Mandatory Reporting of GHGs From Industrial Landfills, Wastewater, Underground Coal Mines,

and Magnesium Production 2060-AQ03

Tier II Light-Duty Vehicle and Light-Duty Truck Emission Standards and Gasoline Sulfur Standards 2060-AQ12

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines—Existing

Stationary Spark Ignition (Gas-Fired) 2060-AQ13

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Area Source Standards for Paints and Allied Products

Manufacturing; Direct Final 2060-AQ14

Minor Harmonizing Changes to General Provisions of the GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule 2060-AQ15

Technical Amendments for Marine Spark-Ignition Engines and Vessels 2060-AQ18

Implementation of the New Source Review Program for Particulate Matter (PM) Less Than 2.5 Micrometers—Final Rule

to End NSR Transition Period for Condensable PM 2060-AQ21

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Area Source Standards for Prepared Feeds Manufacturing–

Amendment 2060-AQ26

Supplemental Determination for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Canola Oil 2060-AQ35

Reconsideration of the 2008 Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone 2060-AQ50

Extension of Deadline for Action on Section 126 Petition From New Jersey 2060-AQ52

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Proposed Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

TSCA Inventory Nomenclature for Enzymes and Proteins 2070-AJ04

Certain Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs); Test Rule and Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) 2070-AJ08

Prions; Amendment of EPA’s Regulatory Definition of Pests to Include Prion 2070-AJ26

Pesticides; Data Requirements for Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) and Certain Exemptions for PIPs 2070-AJ27

Regulations To Facilitate Compliance With the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act by Producers of

Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) 2070-AJ32

Pesticides; Reconsideration of Exemptions for Insect Repellents 2070-AJ45

Mercury; Regulation of Use in Certain Products 2070-AJ46

Nanoscale Materials; Test Rule for Certain Nanoscale Materials 2070-AJ47

Electronic Reporting of Chemical Import Data in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) 2070-AJ50

Mercury; Incorporation of Revised ASTM Standards Into EPA Regulations That Provide Flexibility in the Use of

Alternatives to Mercury-Containing Thermometers 2070-AJ51

Significant New Use Rule for Glymes 2070-AJ52

Pesticides; Regulation to Clarify Labeling of Pesticides for Export 2070-AJ53

Nanoscale Materials; Reporting Under TSCA Section 8(a) 2070-AJ54

Pesticides; Satisfaction of Data Requirements; Minor Revisions to the Procedures to Ensure Protection of Data

Submitters' Rights 2070-AJ58

Pesticides; Clarifying Changes to Labeling 2070-AJ61

TSCA Reporting Requirements; Minor Revisions 2070-AJ63

General Exemptions From Reporting Requirements for Microorganisms; Revisions of Recipient Organisms Eligible for

Tier I and Tier II Exemptions 2070-AJ65

High Production Volume Chemicals; 4th Group of Chemicals; Test Rule and Significant New Use Rule 2070-AJ66

Nanoscale Materials; Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) 2070-AJ67

TSCA Inventory; Clarification for Chemical Identification Describing Statutory Mixtures, Including Ceramic Materials,

Cements, and Frits for TSCA Inventory Purposes 2070-AJ68

TSCA Chemicals of Concern List Under Section 5(b)(4) of the Toxic Substances Control Act 2070-AJ70

Mercury; Significant New Use Rule; Elemental Mercury Used in Barometers, Manometers, and

Hygrometers/Psychrometers 2070-AJ71

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Di-n-pentyl Phthalate (DnPP) 2070-AJ73

Electronic Reporting for Health and Safety Data Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 2070-AJ75

Revisions to EPA's Rule on Protections for Subjects in Human Research Involving Pesticides 2070-AJ76

Synchronizing the Expiration Dates of EPA Pesticide Applicator Certificates With the Underlying State or Tribal 2070-AJ77

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

19
Applicator Certificate

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Benzidine-Based Dyes 2070-AJ78

Pesticides; Revisions to Minimum Risk Exemptions 2070-AJ79

Pesticides; Clarifications for Microbial Pesticide Definitions and Applicability 2070-AJ80

Short-Chained Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs); Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) 2070-AJ81

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Final Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Follow-Up Rules on Existing Chemicals 2070-AA58

Significant New Use Rules (SNURs); Follow-Up Rules on Non-5(e) New Chemical Substances 2070-AA59

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Chemical-Specific SNURs To Extend Provisions of Section 5(e) Orders 2070-AB27

Groundwater and Pesticide Management Plan Rule 2070-AC46

High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals; Testing of Certain Chemicals 2070-AD16

Pesticides; Data Requirements for Antimicrobials 2070-AD30

Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for Those Derived Through Genetic Engineering From Sexually

Compatible Plants 2070-AD55

Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for PIPs That Act by Primarily Affecting the Plant 2070-AD56

Pesticides; Expansion of Crop Grouping Program 2070-AJ28

TSCA Inventory Update Reporting Modifications 2070-AJ43

Lead; Clearance and Clearance Testing Requirements for the Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program 2070-AJ57

Mercury Export Ban Act (MEBA); Essential Use Exemption Instructions 2070-AJ60

Revision to Compliance Date for Pesticide Container/Containment Rule 2070-AJ74

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Long-term Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

TSCA Section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rules 2070-AB08

TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting Rules 2070-AB11

Testing of Existing Chemicals (Overview Entry for Future Needs) 2070-AB94

Lead Fishing Sinkers; Manufacturing, Processing, and Distribution in Commerce 2070-AC21

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Refractory Ceramic Fibers (RCFs) 2070-AC37

Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan Revisions 2070-AC51

Lead-Based Paint Activities; Bridges and Structures; Training, Accreditation, and Certification Rule and Model State

Plan Rule 2070-AC64

Pesticides; Registration Requirements for Antimicrobial Pesticide Products 2070-AD14

Test Rule; Multiple Substance Rule for the Testing of Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity 2070-AD44

Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for those Based on Viral Coat Protein Genes 2070-AD49

Lead-Based Paint; Amendments to the Requirements for Disclosure of Known Lead-Based Paint or Lead-Based Paint

Hazards in Target Housing 2070-AD64

Testing Agreement for Aryl Phosphates (ITC List 2) 2070-AJ07

Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Applicators 2070-AJ20

Pesticides; Agricultural Worker Protection Standard Revisions 2070-AJ22

Pesticides; Tolerance Processing Fees 2070-AJ23

Significant New Use Rule for Chloranil 2070-AJ31

Test Rule; Nonylphenol (NP) and its Ethoxylates (NPE) 2070-AJ34

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Reassessment of Use Authorizations 2070-AJ38

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Placeholder for Petitions Seeking a Manufacturing (Import) Exemption for Use 2070-AJ39

Formaldehyde Emissions From Pressed Wood Products 2070-AJ44

Pesticides; Data Requirements for Product Performance 2070-AJ49

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

20
Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program for Public and Commercial Buildings 2070-AJ56

Pesticides; Public Availability of Identities of Inert Ingredients in Pesticides 2070-AJ62

Lead Wheel Weights; Regulatory Investigation 2070-AJ64

Short-Chained Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs); Regulation(s) Under TSCA 2070-AJ69

Long-Chain Perfluorinated Chemicals (LCPFCs); Regulation(s) Under TSCA 2070-AJ72

Lead; Residential Lead Dust Hazard Standards 2070-AJ82

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Completed Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Test Rule; Certain Chemicals on the ATSDR Priority List of Hazardous Substances 2070-AB79

Testing of Certain Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) 2070-AC76

TSCA Policy Statement on Oversight of Transgenic Organisms (Including Plants) 2070-AD53

Effects of Transfers of Ownership on Obligations Under Section 5 of TSCA 2070-AJ15

Pesticide Agricultural Container Recycling Program 2070-AJ29

Mercury; Significant New Use Rule for Elemental Mercury in Flow Meters, Manometers, and Pyrometers 2070-AJ36

Lead; Amendment to the Opt-Out and Recordkeeping Provisions in the Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program 2070-AJ55

Amendments to the Procedural Rules for Enforceable Consent Agreements (ECAs) 2070-AJ59

Office of the Administrator - Completed Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Age Discrimination Regulations—EPA-Assisted Programs—Age Discrimination Act of 1975 2090-AA37

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Regional Office Dallas ( RODALLAS ) RIN: 2006-AA00

 View Related Documents

Title: Oklahoma Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plan (FIP)

Abstract: EPA is under a consent decree with Wild Earth Guardians to either propose approval of a State Implementation

Plan (SIP), or propose approval of a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP), or some combination to satisfy the visibility prong of

the transport requirements for Oklahoma under section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) by November 10, 2010, with a

final decision by May 10, 2011. EPA's plan is to satisfy that requirement using the Regional Haze SIPs. The agency currently

has a Regional Haze SIP that was submitted by Oklahoma. However, EPA expects to propose disapproval of the SIP on

grounds that it does not include Sulfur dioxide (SO2) controls for six coal fired power plants. The Oklahoma SIP did not require

SO2 controls based on the company's projections of the expected cost of the controls. In the analysis submitted by Oklahoma

in their Regional Haze SIP revision, they determined that the installation of the scrubbers would be technologically feasible, and

the only factor leading them to their decision to not require the installation of these scrubbers at the 6 power plants in question

is cost-effectiveness. However, EPA's internal analysis indicates the power company's cost estimates were too high. Based on

our preliminary assessment of Oklahoma’s cost analysis for the six SO2 scrubbers, Oklahoma’s Regional Haze SIP is not

approvable. The ultimate decision of cost effectiveness is made by EPA. Should EPA conclude, in the final decision, that the

controls are in fact cost effective and should be installed, the agency is obligated to promulgate its own plan—a FIP that would

require those controls. EPA estimates, based on 90% control and using 2006-2008 data, that the installations of scrubbers on

the six coal fired power plant units would prevent 58,768 tons of SO2 from being emitted annually. The total SO2 emission

budget for Oklahoma, based on 2002 data (most recent available) is 170,021 tons. Therefore, the scrubber installations would

reduce by about 35 percent Oklahoma's annual SO2 emissions. It is believed that these controls would result in substantial

visibility benefits at several Class I areas. This amount of SO2 reduction would also have significant health benefits to the

citizens of Oklahoma and adjoining areas.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

21
NPRM Judicial Court-ordered consent decree deadline for proposed rule is November

10, 2010. 11/10/2010 

Other Judicial Court-ordered consent decree deadline for final rule is May 10, 2011. 05/10/2011 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 05/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Guy Donaldson Environmental Protection Agency

Regional Office Dallas

6PD-L

Dallas , TX 75223 

Phone: 214 665-7242 

E-Mail: Donaldson.Guy@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Joe Kordzi Environmental Protection Agency

Regional Office Dallas

6PD-L

Dallas , TX 75223 

Phone: 214 665-7186 

E-Mail: Kordzi.Joe@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Regional Office San Francisco ( ROSANFRAN ) RIN: 2009-AA04

 View Related Documents

Title: Regulation To Establish No Discharge Zone in California State Waters Under CWA 312(f)(4)(A)

Abstract: Based upon a 2005 California law, the State Water Resources Control Board asked EPA to designate California

waters as a No Discharge Zone (NDZ) for sewage from cruise ships and ocean-going vessels with adequate holding capacity.

The State, local environmental groups, and California delegation all strongly support establishment of such an NDZ, as it would

offer additional water quality protection to the California coast. There are two novel aspects of this proposed NDZ. All existing

NDZs prohibit all sewage from all vessels; however, the California request applies to only a subset of all vessels. No existing

NDZ established under 312(f)(4)(A) applies to all state waters either. Only two NDZs have been established under 312(f)(4)(A):

Minnesota Boundary Waters Canoe Area and Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 140 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CWA 312(f)(4)(A)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/02/2010 75 FR 53914 

NPRM Comment Period End 11/01/2010 

Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5413

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Allan Ota Environmental Protection Agency

Regional Office San Francisco

San Francisco , CA 94105 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

22
Phone: 415 972-3476 

E-Mail: ota.allan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of General Council ( OGC ) RIN: 2015-AA00

 View Related Documents

Title: Revision of Procedural Rules for Hearings on Cancellations, Suspensions, Changes in Classifications, and Denials of

Pesticide Registrations

Abstract: EPA is preparing a revision of the Rules of Practice governing the conduct of licensing adjudications under the

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). The existing Rules of Practice were originally promulgated by EPA

in 1973. In the subsequent 35 years, Congress has substantially amended FIFRA, creating a number of additional types of

licensing adjudications which are not expressly provided for in the existing Rules of Practice. In order to include provisions

tailored to these new types of proceedings, and to incorporate the standard practices which have evolved and the precedents

which have been established since these rules were first promulgated, EPA intends to revise the FIFRA Rules of Practice.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 164 (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a(c) to 136a(d); 7 USC 136b(d) to 136b(f); 7 USC 136d(b) to 7 USC 136d(e); 7 USC 136w(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 08/00/2011 

Additional Information: Previous listed as RIN 2020-AA44.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 111; 112; 32532

Related RINs: Previously Reported as 2020-AA44

Agency Contact: Scott Garrison Environmental Protection Agency

Office of General Council

2333A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-4047 

FAX: 202 564-5644

E-Mail: Garrison.Scott@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robert Perlis Environmental Protection Agency

Office of General Council

2333A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-5636 

FAX: 202 564-5644

E-Mail: perlis.robert@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of General Council ( OGC ) RIN: 2015-AA01

 View Related Documents

Title: Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency will, with the concurrence of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), revise

the Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Environmental Protection Agency (regulation) at 5 CFR

Part 6401. The regulation supplements the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch (Standards)

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

23
issued by OGE. The revisions to the regulation are necessary to update, clarify, and address ethical issues unique to EPA

employees. The regulation prohibits certain EPA employees from holding certain financial interests, including compensated

outside employment with certain persons; and it requires EPA employees to obtain prior approval to engage in certain

categories of outside employment.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 5 CFR 6401(Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 5 USC 7301

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5291.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Jennie Keith Environmental Protection Agency

Office of General Council

2310A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3412 

E-Mail: Keith.Jennie@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Justina Fugh Environmental Protection Agency

Office of General Council

2310A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1786 

E-Mail: fugh.justina@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance ( OECA ) RIN: 2020-AA47

 View Related Documents

Title: NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule

Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has responsibility to ensure that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA)

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program is effectively and consistently implemented across the

country. This regulation would identify the essential information that EPA needs to receive electronically, primarily from NPDES

permittees with some data required from NPDES agencies (NPDES-authorized States, territories, and tribes) to manage the

national NPDES permitting and enforcement program. Through this regulation, EPA seeks to ensure that such facility-specific

information would be readily available, accurate, timely, and nationally consistent on the facilities that are regulated by the

NPDES program. In the past, EPA primarily obtained this information from the Permit Compliance System (PCS). However, the

evolution of the NPDES program since the inception of PCS has created an increasing need to better reflect a more complete

picture of the NPDES program and the diverse universe of regulated sources. In addition, information technology has advanced

significantly so that PCS no longer meets EPA’s national needs to manage the full scope of the NPDES program or the needs of

individual States that use PCS to implement and enforce the NPDES program.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 123, 403, and 501 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CWA secs 304(i) and 501(a), 33 USC 1314(i) and 1361(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As the NPDES program and information technology have evolved in the past several decades, the

Permit Compliance System (PCS), EPA's NPDES national data system, which has been in use since 1985, has become

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

24
increasingly ineffective in meeting the full scope of EPA's and individual State's needs to manage, direct, oversee, and report

on the implementation and enforcement of the NPDES program. Therefore, a NPDES component of EPA's existing Integrated

Compliance Information System (ICIS), ICIS-NPDES, was designed and constructed based upon EPA and State input to

manage data for the full breadth of the NPDES program. This rulemaking would identify essential NPDES-specific information

EPA needs to receive from NPDES agencies (authorized States and tribes, as well as EPA Regions). This information will be

managed by EPA in a format compatible with the new NPDES component of the Integrated Compliance Information System

(ICIS) in order to better enable EPA to ensure the protection of public health and the environment, effectively manage the

national NPDES permitting and enforcement program, identify and address environmental problems, and ultimately replace

PCS. This action would be of interest primarily to NPDES permittees, NPDES-authorized states, and to the public at large,

which would ultimately have increased access to this NPDES information.

Legal Basis: In 1972, Congress passed the Clean Water Act to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological

integrity of the Nation's waters." 33 U.S.C. 1251(a). The Clean Water Act established a comprehensive program for protecting

and restoring our Nation’s waters. The Clean Water Act prohibits the discharge of pollutants from a point source to waters of the

United States except when authorized by a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The Clean Water

Act established the NPDES permit program to authorize and regulate the discharges of pollutants to waters of the United

States. EPA has issued comprehensive regulations that implement the NPDES program at 40 CFR parts 122 to 125, 129 to

133, 136, and subpart N. Under the NPDES permit program, point sources subject to regulation may discharge pollutants to

waters of the United States subject to the terms and conditions of an NPDES permit. With very few exceptions (40 CFR 122.3),

point sources require NPDES permit authorization to discharge, including both municipal and industrial discharges. NPDES

permit authorization may be provided under an individual NPDES permit, which is developed after a process initiated by a

permit application (40 CFR 122.21), or under a general NPDES permit, which, among other things, applies to one or more

categories of dischargers (e.g., oil and gas facilities, seafood processors) with the same or substantially similar types of

operations and the same effluent limitations, operating conditions, or standards for sewage sludge use or disposal [40 CFR

122.28(a)(2)]. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has the primary responsibility to ensure that the NPDES program is

effectively and consistently implemented across the country, thus ensuring that public health and environmental protection goals

of the CWA are met. Many States and some territories have received authorization to implement and enforce the NPDES

program, and EPA works with its State partners to ensure effective program implementation and enforcement. CWA section

304(i)(2) directs EPA to promulgate guidelines establishing the minimum procedural and other elements of a State, territory, or

tribal NPDES program, including monitoring requirements, reporting requirements (including procedures to make information

available to the public), enforcement provisions, and funding, personnel qualifications, and manpower requirements [CWA

section 304(i)(2)]. EPA published NPDES State, territory, and tribal program regulations under CWA section 304(i)(2) at 40 CFR

part 123. Among other things, the part 123 regulations specify NPDES program requirements for permitting, compliance

evaluation programs, enforcement authority, sharing of information, transmission of information to EPA, and noncompliance and

program reporting to EPA. This proposed rulemaking may add some specificity to those particular regulations regarding what

NPDES information is required to be submitted to EPA by States and may modify other regulations to require electronic

reporting of NPDES information by NPDES permittees to the States and EPA.

Alternatives: For this proposed rulemaking, EPA has determined that the need for EPA's receipt of such NPDES

information exists. If, for whatever reason, electronic reporting by permittees is not a feasible option for certain NPDES

information, the obvious alternative would be for EPA to require States to provide that information to EPA. The States already

receive that information from the permittees, and therefore, they have the information that EPA seeks. Within the rulemaking

process itself, various alternatives are under consideration based on the feasibility of particular electronic reporting options. For

example, EPA may consider establishing requirements for electronic reporting of discharge monitoring reports by NPDES

permittees. Under this proposed rulemaking, EPA may consider establishing similar requirements for any or all of the following

types of NPDES information: Notices of intent to discharge (for facilities seeking coverage under general permits), permitting

information (including permit applications), various program reports (e.g., pretreatment compliance reports from approved local

pretreatment programs, annual reports from concentrated animal feeding operations, biosolids reports, sewage overflow incident

reports, annual reports for pesticide applicators, annual reports for municipal storm water systems), and annual compliance

certifications. Some States might also raise the possibility of supplying only summary-level information to EPA rather than

facility-specific information to EPA. Based upon considerable experience, EPA considers such alternative non-facility-specific

data to be insufficient to meet its needs, except in very particular situations or reports. One alternative that EPA may consider

for rule implementation is whether third-party vendors may be better equipped to develop and modify such electronic reporting

tools than EPA.

Costs and Benefits: The economic analysis for this proposed rulemaking has not yet been completed; therefore, the dollar

values of estimated costs and benefits are not yet known. However, some generalizations can still be made regarding

expectations. EPA anticipates that electronic reporting of discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) by NPDES permittees will

provide significant data entry cost savings for States and EPA. These discharge monitoring reports are already required to be

submitted by NPDES permittees to States and EPA, which in turn currently enter that information into the State NPDES data

system or EPA's national NPDES data system. These discharge monitoring reports contain significant amounts of information

regarding pollutants discharged, identified concentrations and quantities of pollutants, discharge locations, etc. Through

electronic reporting by permittees, States, and EPA will no longer have associated data entry costs to enter this information.

Electronic reporting by NPDES permittees of other NPDES information (such as notices of intent to discharge or various

program reports) may also yield considerable data entry savings to the States and EPA. In addition, some States have been

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

25
able to quantify savings by the permittees to electronically report their NPDES information using existing electronic reporting

tools. Such savings are being examined in the economic analysis process for this rulemaking. Additional benefits of this rule will

likely include improved transparency of information regarding the NPDES program, improved information regarding the national

NPDES program, improved targeting of resources and enforcement based on identified program needs and noncompliance

problems, and ultimately improved protection of public health and the environment. Some NPDES information will need to be

reported by States to EPA; therefore, there will be some data entry costs associated with that information, but it will likely be far

less than the savings that will be realized by States through electronic reporting by NPDES permittees. In addition, EPA will

likely have sizable costs to develop tools for electronic reporting by permittees, as well as operation and maintenance costs

associated with those tools.

Risks: Given the scope of this proposed rulemaking, the most significant risks associated with this effort may be those if EPA

does not proceed with this rulemaking. At this point, EPA does not receive sufficient NPDES information from the States to be

able to fully assess the implementation of the national NPDES program nor the smaller subprograms. Such information is not

currently required by EPA from the States, and the lack of such reporting requirements perpetuates this problem. Furthermore,

EPA does not have facility-specific information regarding most of the facilities regulated under the NPDES program, and

therefore, EPA cannot easily identify potential implementation problems or noncompliance problems. This lack of information

may adversely impact EPA's ability to better ensure the protection of public health and the environment, nationally and locally.

A potential risk associated with this rule may involve EPA efforts to develop electronic reporting tools for use by permittees. The

costs associated with the internal development of such tools, possibly for multiple types of NPDES information from various

types of NPDES permittees, and the future costs of operation and maintenance may be substantial for EPA, possibly impacting

the availability of funding for other purposes. Furthermore, EPA would also need to determine the feasibility of ensuring that the

electronic tools can be flexible enough to meet State needs and work well with State data systems. Problems in the

development and maintenance of these electronic tools could pose significant risks for the effective implementation of this rule.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice--Public Meeting 07/01/2010 75 FR 38068 

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Final Action 04/00/2012 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5251

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Andrew Hudock Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

2222A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-6032 

E-Mail: Hudock.Andrew@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: John Dombrowski Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

2222A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0742 

E-Mail: Dombrowski.John@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance ( OECA ) RIN: 2020-AA49

 View Related Documents

Title: Technical Corrections to Title 40 To Conform to the Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule

Abstract: On December 11, 2008, EPA promulgated the 2008 Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule (73 FR

75340) to adjust all statutory civil monetary penalties for inflation. This rule was issued pursuant to the Debt Collection

Improvement Act (DCIA), which requires each federal agency to adjust statutory penalty amounts under its jurisdiction to

account for inflation. During the course of that rulemaking, EPA discovered that certain regulatory provisions of title 40 referred

to outdated statutory civil penalty amounts. This rulemaking will amend all regulatory references to specific civil penalty amounts

to refer to the operative effective statutory maximum penalty amount reflected in 40 CFR 19.4.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

26
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 19.4 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 31 USC 3701

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 09/00/2012 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5325.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: David Abdalla Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

2248A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-2413 

E-Mail: Abdalla.David@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Susan O'Keefe Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

2248A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-4021 

E-Mail: OKeefe.Susan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA11

 View Related Documents

Title: Clarify TRI Reporting Obligations Under EPCRA Section 313 for Metal Mining Activities

Abstract: The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) currently requires reporting from metal mining facilities if they manufacture or

process 25,000 pounds or more of a listed chemical or otherwise use 10,000 pounds or more of a listed chemical. These mining

facilities engage in the removal of naturally occurring materials from the earth. EPA had considered naturally occurring materials

to be manufactured by natural processes. A recent court order set aside EPA's interpretation of manufacture in the mining

context, stating that naturally occurring ores in situ have not been manufactured within the meaning of Emergency Planning and

Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) section 313. EPA is considering clarifying how the definitions of manufacturing and

processing under EPCRA section 313 apply to the mining sector processes of extraction and beneficiation. This action will not

affect the coal extraction activities exemption.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 11001 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Final Action 09/00/2011 

Additional Information: Facilities included in the following NAICS manufacturing codes (corresponding to SIC codes 20

through 39): 311*,312*, 313*, 314*, 315*, 316, 321, 322, 323*, 324, 325*, 326*, 327, 331, 332, 333, 334*, 335*, 336, 337*,

339*,111998*, 211112*, 212234*, 212235*, 212393*, 212399*, 488390*, 511110, 511120, 511130, 511140*, 511191,511199,

511220, 512230*, 516110*, 541710*, or 811490*. *Exceptions and/or limitations exist for these NAICS codes. Facilities included

in the following NAICS codes (corresponding to SIC codes other than SIC codes 20 through 39): 212111, 212112, 212113

(correspond to SIC 12, Coal Mining (except 1241)); or 212221, 212222, 212231, 212234, 212299 (correspond to SIC 10, Metal

Mining (except 1011, 1081, and 1094)); or 221111, 221112, 221113, 221119, 221121, 221122 (Limited to facilities that combust

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

27
coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce) (correspond to SIC 4911, 4931, and 4939,

Electric Utilities); or 424690, 425110, 425120 (Limited to facilities previously classified in SIC 5169, Chemicals and Allied

Products, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 424710 (corresponds to SIC 5171, Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants); or 562112

(Limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a contract or fee basis (previously classified under SIC

7389, Business Services, NEC)); or 562211, 562212, 562213, 562219, 562920 (Limited to facilities regulated under the

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.) (correspond to SIC 4953, Refuse Systems).; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-OEI-2009-0453

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/tri/programs/mining/index.htm

Agency Contact: Daniel Teitelbaum Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0964 

FAX: 202 566-0741

E-Mail: Teitelbaum.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Gilbert Mears Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0954 

FAX: 202 566-0741

E-Mail: Mears.Gilbert@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA19

 View Related Documents

Title: TRI; Response to Petition To Delete Acetonitrile From the Toxics Release Inventory List of Toxic Chemicals

Abstract: This action will respond to a petition received by EPA to delete acetonitrile from the list of toxic chemicals

reportable under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA). EPA will respond to the

petition by either granting or denying the petition. If EPA grants the petition a notice of proposed rulemaking will be published in

the Federal Register, if EPA denies the petition a notice of petition denial will be published. The deletion of this chemical would

eliminate all the reporting requirements under the Toxic Chemical Release Reporting Rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023(e)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Response 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2025-AA00. Formerly listed as RIN 2070-AC00. Statutory deadline: Within 180 days

of receipt the Agency must either initiate rulemaking or explain why not in the Federal Register. Manufacturing industries in SIC

codes 20-39 plus the following industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10 except SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094);

Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except SIC code 1241); Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939); Commercial Hazardous

Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and Allied Products-Wholesale (SIC code 5169); Petroleum Bulk Terminals and

Plants (SIC code 5171); and, Solvent Recovery Services (SIC code 7389).

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

28
Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/tri

Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0743 

E-Mail: Bushman.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Nicole Paquette Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0642 

E-Mail: Paquette.Nicole@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA24

 View Related Documents

Title: Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Articles Exemption Clarification Rule

Abstract: Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting is required by section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community

Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and section 6607 of the Pollution Prevention Act. The purpose of this rule is to clarify the scope of

the exemption from TRI reporting requirements for items that qualify as articles. [See 40 CFR 372.38(b).] EPA believes that

language contained in the regulation and subsequent guidance should be clarified for the regulated community concerning what

items qualify as articles and are therefore exempt from TRI threshold determinations and TRI release and other waste

management calculations and reporting.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372.38(b) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023 et seq; 42 USC 13106 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/24/2009 74 FR 42625 

Final Action 06/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a10bb0; Facilities included in the following

NAICS manufacturing codes (corresponding to SIC codes 20 through 39): 311*,312*, 313*, 314*, 315*, 316, 321, 322, 323*,

324, 325*, 326*, 327, 331, 332, 333, 334*, 335*, 336, 337*, 339*,111998*, 211112*, 212234*, 212235*, 212393*, 212399*,

488390*, 511110, 511120, 511130, 511140*, 511191,511199, 511220, 512230*, 516110*, 541710*, or 811490*. *Exceptions

and/or limitations exist for these NAICS codes. Facilities included in the following NAICS codes (corresponding to SIC codes

other than SIC codes 20 through 39): 212111, 212112, 212113 (correspond to SIC 12, Coal Mining (except 1241)); or 212221,

212222, 212231, 212234, 212299 (correspond to SIC 10, Metal Mining (except 1011, 1081, and 1094)); or 221111, 221112,

221113, 221119, 221121, 221122 (Limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for

distribution in commerce) (correspond to SIC 4911, 4931, and 4939, Electric Utilities); or 424690, 425110, 425120 (Limited to

facilities previously classified in SIC 5169, Chemicals and Allied Products, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 424710 (corresponds to

SIC 5171, Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants); or 562112 (Limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services

on a contract or fee basis (previously classified under SIC 7389, Business Services, NEC)); or 562211, 562212, 562213,

562219, 562920 (Limited to facilities regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. 6921

et seq.) (correspond to SIC 4953, Refuse Systems).; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-TRI-2009-0602; accessible at:

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#searchResults?Ne=11+8+8053+8098+8074+8066+8084+1&Ntt=TRI-2009-

0602&Ntk=All&Ntx=mode+matchall&N=0

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Larry Reisman Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

29
Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0751 

E-Mail: reisman.larry@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ingrid Rosencrantz Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0961 

E-Mail: rosencrantz.ingrid@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA27

 View Related Documents

Title: TRI: Intent to Consider Lifting Administrative Stay Regarding Hydrogen Sulfide Reporting Requirements; Opportunity for

Public Comment

Abstract: In response to a petition from the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Governor of New York, hydrogen

sulfide, along with 20 other chemicals and two chemical categories, was added to the Emergency Planning and Community

Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) section 313 list of toxic chemicals as part of a 1993 final rule (December 1, 1993, 58 FR 63500).

Hydrogen sulfide was listed under the criteria of EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(B) based on chronic neurotoxic effects in humans and

under EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(C) based on acute aquatic toxicity. However, on August 22, 1994 (59 FR 43048), EPA issued

an Administrative Stay of the EPCRA section 313 reporting requirements for hydrogen sulfide. Some members of the regulated

community expressed concern that the specific basis for listing hydrogen sulfide under EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(B) changed

between the proposed rule (September 8, 1992, 57 FR 41020) and the final rule (December 1, 1993, 58 FR 63500) and that

they did not have an opportunity to comment on the final basis for the addition under EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(B). Although the

statutory basis for the determination did not change, the Agency did cite chronic neurotoxic effects in the final rule and chronic

respiratory effects in the proposed rule as the specific effects of concern. In addition, charges were made that EPA’s decision

not to include evidence of exposure in deciding to list hydrogen sulfide on the basis of chronic human health effects was

inconsistent with past Agency practice. EPA did not agree that it had been inconsistent in its use of exposure analysis in

EPCRA section 313 listings, but felt that the public deserved an opportunity to be presented with further clarification of the

Agency’s position on this issue. Therefore, the Agency decided to issue an administrative stay of the reporting requirements for

hydrogen sulfide in order to allow for additional time to review these issues. EPA stated that a subsequent Federal Register

notice would provide a mechanism for the public to comment on the specific basis for listing hydrogen sulfide as well as

providing a more complete discussion of use of exposure analysis in EPCRA section 313 listing decisions. This action is the

subsequent Federal Register notice. EPA will take comments on its latest hazard assessment for hydrogen sulfide and EPA’s

intent to consider lifting the administrative stay.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice 02/26/2010 75 FR 8889 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480aaf30f; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–

TRI–2009–0844

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/tri

Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Environmental Information

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

30
2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0743 

E-Mail: Bushman.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Nicole Paquette Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0642 

E-Mail: Paquette.Nicole@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA16

 View Related Documents

Title: TRI; Response to Petition To Delete Chromium, Antimony, Titanate From the Metal Compound Categories Listed on the

Toxics Release Inventory

Abstract: This action was suspended on May 22, 2007 at the request of the petitioner. If resumed, this action will respond to

a petition received by EPA to delete chromium, antimony, titanate from the list of toxic chemicals reportable under section 313

of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA). EPA will respond to the petition by either granting or

denying the petition. If EPA grants the petition a notice of proposed rulemaking will be published in the Federal Register, if EPA

denies the petition a notice of petition denial will be published. Chromium, antimony, titanate is reportable under the chromium

and antimony compound categories, the deletion of this chemical would eliminate all the reporting requirements under the Toxic

Chemical Release Reporting Rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 11013 EPCRA 313

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Response 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2025-AA00. Formerly listed as RIN 2070-AC00. Statutory deadline: Within 180 days

of receipt the Agency must either initiate rulemaking or explain why not in the Federal Register. Manufacturing industries in SIC

codes 20-39 plus the following industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10 except SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094);

Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except SIC code 1241); Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939); Commercial Hazardous

Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and Allied Products-Wholesale (SIC code 5169); Petroleum Bulk Terminals and

Plants (SIC code 5171); and, Solvent Recovery Services (SIC code 7389). Facilities included in the following NAICS

manufacturing codes (corresponding to SIC codes 20 through 39): 311*,312*, 313*, 314*, 315*, 316, 321, 322, 323*, 324, 325*,

326*, 327, 331, 332, 333, 334*, 335*, 336, 337*, 339*,111998*, 211112*, 212234*, 212235*, 212393*, 212399*, 488390*,

511110, 511120, 511130, 511140*, 511191,511199, 511220, 512230*, 516110*, 541710*, or 811490*. *Exceptions and/or

limitations exist for these NAICS codes. Facilities included in the following NAICS codes (corresponding to SIC codes other than

SIC codes 20 through 39): 212111, 212112, 212113 (correspond to SIC 12, Coal Mining (except 1241)); or 212221, 212222,

212231, 212234, 212299 (correspond to SIC 10, Metal Mining (except 1011, 1081, and 1094)); or 221111, 221112, 221113,

221119, 221121, 221122 (Limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in

commerce) (correspond to SIC 4911, 4931, and 4939, Electric Utilities); or 424690, 425110, 425120 (Limited to facilities

previously classified in SIC 5169, Chemicals and Allied Products, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 424710 (corresponds to SIC

5171, Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants); or 562112 (Limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a

contract or fee basis (previously classified under SIC 7389, Business Services, NEC)); or 562211, 562212, 562213, 562219,

562920 (Limited to facilities regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.)

(correspond to SIC 4953, Refuse Systems).

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/tri

Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

31
Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0743 

E-Mail: Bushman.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Nicole Paquette Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0642 

E-Mail: Paquette.Nicole@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA17

 View Related Documents

Title: TRI; Response to Petition To Add Diisononyl Phthalate to the Toxics Release Inventory List of Toxic Chemicals

Abstract: This action will respond to a petition received by EPA to add diisononyl phthalate to the list of toxic chemicals

reportable under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA). EPA will respond to the

petition by either granting or denying the petition. If EPA grants the petition a notice of proposed rulemaking will be published in

the Federal Register, if EPA denies the petition a notice of petition denial will be published. The addition of this chemical would

make it subject to all the reporting requirements under the Toxic Chemical Release Reporting Rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023(e)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM Original 09/05/2000 65 FR 53681 

Notice of Data Availability 06/14/2005 70 FR 34437 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2025-AA00. Formerly listed as RIN 2070-AC00. Statutory deadline: Within 180 days

of receipt the Agency must either initiate rulemaking or explain why not in the Federal Register. Manufacturing industries in SIC

codes 20-39 plus the following industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10 except SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094);

Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except SIC code 1241); Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939); Commercial Hazardous

Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and Allied Products-Wholesale (SIC code 5169); Petroleum Bulk Terminals and

Plants (SIC code 5171); and, Solvent Recovery Services (SIC code 7389). Facilities included in the following NAICS

manufacturing codes (corresponding to SIC codes 20 through 39): 311*,312*, 313*, 314*, 315*, 316, 321, 322, 323*, 324, 325*,

326*, 327, 331, 332, 333, 334*, 335*, 336, 337*, 339*,111998*, 211112*, 212234*, 212235*, 212393*, 212399*, 488390*,

511110, 511120, 511130, 511140*, 511191,511199, 511220, 512230*, 516110*, 541710*, or 811490*. *Exceptions and/or

limitations exist for these NAICS codes. Facilities included in the following NAICS codes (corresponding to SIC codes other than

SIC codes 20 through 39): 212111, 212112, 212113 (correspond to SIC 12, Coal Mining (except 1241)); or 212221, 212222,

212231, 212234, 212299 (correspond to SIC 10, Metal Mining (except 1011, 1081, and 1094)); or 221111, 221112, 221113,

221119, 221121, 221122 (Limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in

commerce) (correspond to SIC 4911, 4931, and 4939, Electric Utilities); or 424690, 425110, 425120 (Limited to facilities

previously classified in SIC 5169, Chemicals and Allied Products, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 424710 (corresponds to SIC

5171, Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants); or 562112 (Limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a

contract or fee basis (previously classified under SIC 7389, Business Services, NEC)); or 562211, 562212, 562213, 562219,

562920 (Limited to facilities regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.)

(correspond to SIC 4953, Refuse Systems).

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/tri

Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

32
Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0743 

E-Mail: Bushman.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Nicole Paquette Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0642 

E-Mail: Paquette.Nicole@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA28

 View Related Documents

Title: Toxics Release Inventory; Addition of National Toxicology Program Carcinogens

Abstract: The National Toxicology Program (NTP) periodically publishes its Report on Carcinogens (RoC) which classifies

chemicals as either “known to be a human carcinogen” or “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.” The RoC is a

congressionally mandated scientific and public health document that provides data on carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, and biologic

mechanisms. The RoC evaluations are performed by scientists from the NTP, other Federal health research and regulatory

agencies, and nongovernmental institutions. The RoC review process includes external peer review and public comment. EPA

reviewed the 11th edition of the NTP RoC to identify those chemicals that are not currently on the Toxics Release Inventory

(TRI) list and that have not previously been reviewed for listing. EPA proposed to add to the TRI list, those NTP carcinogens

that had sufficient production or use levels such that the Agency expects that TRI reports will be filed. EPA is reviewing

comments received on the proposed rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023(d)(2)(B)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM Comment Period Extended 04/06/2010 75 FR 17333 

NPRM Comment Period Extended End 06/07/2010 

Final Rule 11/26/2010 75 FR 72727 

Final Rule Effective 11/30/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.epa.gov/tri/lawsandregs/ntp_chemicals/NTPchemicals_proposed%20Rule04062010.pdf; EPA Docket information:

EPA–HQ–TRI–2010–0006

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/tri

Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0743 

E-Mail: Bushman.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Nicole Paquette Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Environmental Information

2844T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0642 

E-Mail: Paquette.Nicole@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

33
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF18

 View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Centralized Waste Treatment Industry

Abstract: In December 2000, EPA promulgated effluent limitations for the Centralized Waste Treatment (CWT) Point Source

Category at 40 CFR 437 (65 FR 81241, December 22, 2000). A CWT facility treats or recovers hazardous or non-hazardous

industrial waste, wastewater, or used material from off-site. The regulation established wastewater discharge standards for three

major types of wastes: metal-bearing, oily, and organic. EPA issued a Small Entity Compliance Guide, which provides easy-toread descriptions of the regulations and other helpful information on how to comply such as a question and answer section.

Pursuant to section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, on April 26, 2010, EPA initiated a review of the rule to determine if it

should be continued without change, or should be rescinded or amended to minimize adverse economic impacts on small

entities (75 FR 21882). As part of this review, EPA is considering, and has solicited comments on, the following factors: (1) the

continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received concerning the rule; (3) the complexity of the

rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal, State, or local government rules; and

(5) the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. The

comment period closed July 31, 2010. The Docket ID number is EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0169. EPA will summarize the results of

this review in a report and place that report in the rulemaking docket referenced above. You can access that docket at

www.regulations.gov. EPA continues to view the effluent limitations for the CWT category as a necessary component of the

comprehensive program to restore and maintain the quality of our Nation’s waters. EPA intends to continue to require

compliance with the regulation. Until and unless the Agency modifies the rule, the discharges described in 40 CFR 437.1 remain

subject to the final rules.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 5 USC 610

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 12/22/2000 65 FR 81241 

Begin Review 04/26/2010 75 FR 21882 

End Comment Period 07/31/2010 75 FR 21882 

End Review 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: Related to RIN 2040-AB78; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0169

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Erik Helm Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1049 

E-Mail: helm.erik@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF24

 View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Arsenic and Clarifications to Compliance and New Source Contaminants

Monitoring

Abstract: On January 22, 2001, EPA revised the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for arsenic to 0.010 mg/L (10.0 μg/L).

This regulation applies to non-transient non-community water systems and to community water systems (66 FR 6976). While

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

34
EPA has taken steps to evaluate and mitigate impacts on small entities as part of the promulgation of the Arsenic Rule, this new

entry in the regulatory agenda announces that EPA will review the National Primary Drinking Water Rule (NPDWR) for arsenic

pursuant to section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 610). As part of this review, EPA will consider and solicit

comments on the following factors: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received

concerning the rule; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other

Federal, State, or local government rules; and (5) the degree to which the technology, economic conditions or other factors

have changed in the area affected by the rule. Comments must be received within 60 days of this notice. In submitting

comments, please reference Docket ID EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0728 and follow the instructions provided in the preamble to this

issue of the Regulatory Agenda. This docket can be accessed at www.regulations.gov.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 5 USC 610

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 01/22/2001 66 FR 6976 

Initiate 610 Review 12/00/2010 

End Comment Period 01/00/2011 

Completion of 610 Review 10/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Stephanie Flaharty Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4601M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-5072 

E-Mail: Flaharty.Stephanie@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Wynne Miller Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4607M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-4887 

FAX: 202 564-3760

E-Mail: miller.wynne@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD02

 View Related Documents

Title: NPDES Permit Requirements for Municipal Sanitary and Combined Sewer Collection Systems, Municipal Satellite

Collection Systems, Sanitary Sewer Overflows, and Peak Excess Flow Treatment Facilities

Abstract: EPA will develop a notice of proposed rulemaking outlining a broad-based regulatory framework for sanitary sewer

collection systems under the NPDES program. The Agency is considering proposing standard permit conditions for inclusion in

permits for publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) and municipal sanitary sewer collection systems. The standard

requirements would address reporting, public notification, and recordkeeping requirements for sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs),

capacity assurance, management, operation, and maintenance requirements for municipal sanitary sewer collection systems;

and a prohibition on SSOs. The Agency is also considering proposing a regulatory framework for applying NPDES permit

conditions, including applicable standard permit conditions, to municipal satellite collection systems. Municipal satellite collection

systems are sanitary sewers owned or operated by a municipality that conveys wastewater to a POTW operated by a different

municipality.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.38; 40 CFR 122.41; 40 CFR 122.42 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

35
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA 301; 33 USC 1314 CWA 304; 33 USC 1318 CWA 308; 33 USC 1342 CWA 402; 33

USC 1361 CWA 501(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: EPA is developing a rule to modify the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations as

they apply to municipal sanitary sewer collection systems and sanitary sewer overflows in order to better protect the

environment and public health from the harmful effects of sanitary sewer overflows and basement back ups.

Legal Basis: The Agency is undertaking this effort to help advance the Clean Water Act objective to restore and maintain

the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters (CWA, sec. 101 (a)).

Alternatives: EPA will consider a variety of options during the rulemaking process.

Costs and Benefits: EPA will consider anticipated costs and benefits during the rulemaking process.

Risks: EPA will consider potential risks during the rulemaking process.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice--Public Meeting 06/01/2010 75 FR 30395 

NPRM 11/00/2011 

Final Action 11/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OW– 2010–0464

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/npdes

Sectors Affected: 22132

Agency Contact: Kevin Weiss Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-0742 

FAX: 202 564-6392

E-Mail: weiss.kevin@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Mohammed Billah Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-0729 

FAX: 202 564-0717

E-Mail: Billah.Mohammed@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD89

 View Related Documents

Title: Regulations for Gray and Black Water Discharges From Cruise Ships Operating in Certain Alaskan Waters

Abstract: On December 12, 2000, Congress passed HR 4577 which contained a section called "Certain Alaskan Cruise Ship

Operations" (Title XIV). Title XIV established enforceable discharge standards for sewage and graywater from large cruise ships

operating in Alaskan waters and authorizes EPA to develop revised and/or additional standards for these discharges into the

waters of Alaska, the Alexander Archipelago, and the Kachemak Bay National Marine Estuarine Research Reserve. EPA will

develop any such standards based on the best available scientific information on the environmental effects of the regulated

discharges and the availability of new technologies for wastewater treatment. The implementation of these regulations would

reduce environmental impacts of cruise ships operating in the waters of Alaska, the Alexander Archipelago, and the Kachemak

Bay National Marine Estuarine Research Reserve.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

36
Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: PL 106-554, sec 1404-1407

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4746

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 483114; 483112

Agency Contact: Laura Johnson Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4504T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1273 

FAX: 202 566-1546

E-Mail: Johnson.Laura-S@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: David Redford Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4504T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1288 

FAX: 202 566-1546

E-Mail: Redford.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AE95

 View Related Documents

Title: Criteria and Standards for Cooling Water Intake Structures

Abstract: Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires EPA to ensure that the location, design, construction, and

capacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available (BTA) for minimizing adverse environmental

impacts. In developing regulations to implement section 316(b), EPA divided its effort into three rulemaking phases. Phase II, for

existing electric generating plants that use at least 50 MGD of cooling water, was completed in July 2004. Industry and

environmental stakeholders challenged the Phase II regulations. On review, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

remanded several key provisions. In July 2007, EPA suspended Phase II. Following the decision in the Second Circuit, several

parties petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review that decision, and the Supreme Court granted the petitions, limited to the

issue of whether the Clean Water Act authorized EPA to consider the relationship of costs and benefits in establishing section

316(b) standards. On April 1, 2009, the Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit, finding that the Agency may consider costbenefit analysis in its decisionmaking but not holding that the Agency must consider costs and benefits in these decisions. In

June 2006, EPA promulgated the Phase III regulation, covering existing electric generating plants using less than 50 MGD of

cooling water, new offshore oil and gas facilities, and all existing manufacturing facilities. Petitions to review this rule were filed

in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. EPA has asked for, and was granted a partial voluntary remand of the

determinations in the Phase III regulation concerning existing facilities, in order to issue a regulation that addresses both Phase

II and III existing facilities. EPA expects this new rulemaking would apply to the approximately 1,200 existing electric generating

and manufacturing plants.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 9; 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 124; 40 CFR 125 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code

of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CWA 101; CWA 308; CWA 316; CWA 402; CWA 501; CWA 510

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

37
Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: In the absence of national regulations, NPDES permit writers have developed requirements to

implement section 316(b) on a case-by-case basis. This may result in a range of different requirements, and, in some cases,

delays in permit issuance or reissuance. This regulation may have substantial ecological benefits.

Legal Basis: The Clean Water Act requires EPA to establish best technology available standards to minimize adverse

environmental impacts from cooling water intake structures. On February 16, 2004, EPA took final action on regulations

governing cooling water intake structures at certain existing power producing facilities under section 316(b) of the Clean Water

Act (Phase II rule). 69 FR 41576 (Jul. 9, 2004). These regulations were challenged , and the Second Circuit remanded several

provisions of the Phase II rule on various grounds. Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA, 475F.3d83, (2d Cir., 2007). EPA suspended most

of the rule in response to the remand. 72 FR 37107 (Jul. 9, 2007). The remand of Phase III does not change permitting

requirements for these facilities. Until the new rule is issued, permit directors continue to issue permits on a case-by-case, Best

Professional Judgment basis for Phase II facilities.

Alternatives: This analysis will cover various sizes and types of potentially regulated facilities, and control technologies.

EPA is considering whether to regulate on a national basis, by subcategory, by broad water body category, or some other basis.

Costs and Benefits: The technologies under consideration in this rulemaking are similar to the technologies considered for

the original Phase II and Phase III rules. Those costs evaluated for the Phase II remanded rule, in 2002 dollars, ranged from

$389 million (the final rule option) to $440 million (the final rule option at proposal) to $1 billion to $3.5 billion (closed cycle

cooling for facilities on certain waterbodies, or at all facilities). The monetized benefits of the original final rule were estimated to

be $82 million. The monetized benefits include only the use value associated with quantifiable increases in commercial and

recreational fisheries. Non-use benefits were not analyzed. The costs and benefits of the Phase III option most closely aligned

with the Phase II option co-promulgated were $38.3 million and $2.3 million respectively, in 2004 dollars. EPA will develop new

costs and benefits estimates for this new effort.

Risks: Cooling water intake structures may pose significant risks for aquatic ecosystems.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Final Action 07/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/waterscience/316b

Agency Contact: Paul Shriner Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1076 

E-Mail: Shriner.Paul@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Erik Helm Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1049 

E-Mail: helm.erik@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF10

 View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation (UCMR 3) for Public Water Systems

Abstract: The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as amended in 1996, requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) to establish criteria for a program to monitor not more than 30 unregulated contaminants every five years. EPA published

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

38
the first group of contaminants in the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation (i.e., UCMR 1), which established a

revised approach for UCMR implementation, in the Federal Register dated September 17, 1999 (64 FR 50556), and the second

list of unregulated contaminants (UCMR 2) in the Federal Register dated January 4, 2007 (72 FR 367). The proposed regulation

will meet the SDWA requirement for identifying new priority contaminants to be monitored during the third UCMR cycle (i.e.,

UCMR 3) of 2012-2015.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory SDWA requires EPA to publish a UCMR every 5 years 01/04/2012 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2011 

Final Action 01/00/2012 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5360

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Dave Munch Environmental Protection Agency

Water

USEPA

Cincinnati , OH 45268 

Phone: 513 569-7843 

FAX: 513 569-7191

E-Mail: Munch.Dave@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Brenda Parris Environmental Protection Agency

Water

USEPA

Cincinnati , OH 45268 

Phone: 513 569-7961 

FAX: 513 569-7191

E-Mail: Parris.Brenda@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF12

 View Related Documents

Title: Amendment to Effluent Guidelines for Primary Aluminum Smelting Subcategory of the Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing

Point Source Category

Abstract: EPA is considering an amendment to 40 CFR 421 to create updated discharge standards for those primary

aluminum smelters that use both wet and dry scrubbing of their air emissions. As currently written, allowances exist for individual

contributions to effluent discharges from a variety of processes present at primary aluminum smelter. These allowances include

one for wastewater contributions resulting from the wet scrubbing of sulfur dioxide from potline emissions (40 CFR 421.23(n)). As

the Agency continues to strengthen the regulation of air pollution from aluminum smelters, it is increasingly likely that higher

wastewater pollutant concentrations from these wet scrubbers will result. The State of New York has identified a facility that

exhibits just this problem with the discharge of fluoride, as a result of interference by sulfur captured by the facility’s wet

scrubber. The extent of this problem is such that the facility is unable to comply with its fluoride effluent limit. An amendment of

the current effluent guideline is a possible means to resolve this tension and make it easier for the Agency and regulated

entities to manage cross-media effects.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 421 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

39
Legal Authority: CWA 301; CWA 304; CWA 306; CWA 307; CWA 308; CWA 501

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2011 

Final Action 07/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0137

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 331312

Agency Contact: Ahmar Siddiqui Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1044 

FAX: 202 566-1053

E-Mail: Siddiqui.Ahmar@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Janet Goodwin Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1060 

E-Mail: Goodwin.Janet@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF13

 View Related Documents

Title: Stormwater Regulations Revision To Address Discharges From Developed Sites

Abstract: Stormwater discharge from developed areas is a major cause of degradation of surface waters. This is true for both

conveyance of pollutants and the erosive power of increased stormwater flow rates and volumes. Current stormwater

regulations were promulgated in 1990 and 1999. In 2006, the Office of Water asked the National Research Council (NRC) to

review the stormwater program and recommend ways to strengthen it. The NRC Report, which was finalized in October 2008,

found that the current stormwater program "...is not likely to adequately control stormwater's contribution to waterbody

impairment" and recommended that EPA take action to address the harmful effects of stormwater flow. This proposed action

would establish requirements for, at minimum, managing stormwater discharges from newly developed and re-developed sites,

to reduce the amount of pollutants in stormwater discharges entering receiving waters by reducing the discharge of excess

stormwater. This action may also expand the scope of municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4) required to be regulated

under NPDES permits, to include rapidly developing areas and to cover some discharges that are not currently regulated. The

Phase I and Phase II MS4 regulations might also be combined and amended, and may include provisions for retrofitting existing

development. In order to comply with the Executive order issued by President Obama on Mat 12, 2010, that among other

things, require EPA to identify ways to strengthen stormwater management practices within the Bay watershed in order to

restore and protect the Bay and its tributaries. EPA plans to include in this proposed rulemaking a separate section containing

additional stormwater provisions for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Chesapeake Bay Settlement Agreement; May 11, 2010; Fowler v US

EPA, No 1 :09-CV -00005-CKK (D DC) 09/30/2011 

Other Judicial Chesapeake Bay Settlement Agreement; May 11, 2010; Fowler v US

EPA, No 1 :09-CV -00005-CKK (D DC) 11/19/2012 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

40
Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act requires EPA to regulate certain stormwater discharges.

Stormwater is a primary contributor of water quality impairment. There is a need to strengthen the stormwater program’s

effectiveness by reducing pollutant loading from currently regulated and unregulated stormwater discharges and preserving

surface water health and integrity. This action was informed by the 2006 National Research Council report.

Legal Basis: Section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act requires EPA to regulate certain discharges from stormwater in order to

protect water quality.

Alternatives: To be determined.

Costs and Benefits: To be determined.

Risks: To be determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice—Public Meeting 00/00/0000 

NPRM 09/00/2011 

Final Action 12/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0817-0319

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business;

Governmental Jurisdictions Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/rulemaking

Agency Contact: Connie Bosma Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-6773 

FAX: 202 564-6392

E-Mail: Bosma.Connie@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Janet Goodwin Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1060 

E-Mail: Goodwin.Janet@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF16

 View Related Documents

Title: Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications

Abstract: EPA is proposing a targeted set of changes to the water quality standards (WQS) regulation to improve its

effectiveness in helping restore and maintain the Nation’s waters. The core of the current WQS regulation has been in place

since 1983, and provides limited guidance on recurring issues, resulting in unresolved issues that reoccur with different fact

patterns and resolved issues that are not codified for future use. The proposed rule will provide clarity in the following six key

areas: 1) antidegradation, 2) Administrator’s determination, 3) uses, 4) variances; 5) triennial review scope and requirements,

and 6) updating regulation to reflect court decisions. EPA expects to publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register in summer

2011.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131(Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

41
Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice - Public Meeting 07/30/2010 75 FR 44930 

NPRM 06/00/2011 

Final Action 06/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0606

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://epa.gov/waterscience/standards

Agency Contact: Grace Robiou Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4305T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-2975 

E-Mail: Robiou.Grace@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Christina Christensen Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4305T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0537 

E-Mail: Christensen.Christina@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF17

 View Related Documents

Title: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Regulations for New Dischargers and the Appropriate

Use of Offsets With Regard to Water Quality Permitting

Abstract: This rulemaking may consider how to best clarify EPA's approach to permitting new dischargers in order to ensure

the protection of water quality under Clean Water Act section 301(b)(1)(C). The rulemaking may examine options to address the

appropriate and permissible use of offsets, which ensures that NPDES permits are protective of water quality standards. The

rulemaking may also examine options for addressing new dischargers in impaired waters, both when a TMDL is in place and

prior to TMDL issuance.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.4(i) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1361; 33 USC 1311(b)(1)(C)

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The EPA is initiating a rulemaking to consider clarifying the EPA's interpretation of 40 CFR section

122.4(i) and addressing the adverse Ninth Circuit decision in Friends of Pinto Creek v. EPA (2007), which created uncertainty

regarding the permitting of new dischargers. Through this rulemaking, EPA will consider how to best ensure that the

requirements at 40 CFR 122.4(i) and/or related regulations pertaining to the permitting of new dischargers are consistent with

Clean Water Act (CWA) requirements.

Legal Basis: Clean Water Act (CWA) section 301(b)(1)(C) requires permits to include limitation as stringent as necessary to

meet water quality standards. The Federal regulations at 40 CFR 122.4(i) implements that requirement for new dischargers.

Alternatives: TBD

Costs and Benefits: TBD

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

42
Risks: TBD

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Final Action 01/00/2012 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5240

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Sara Hilbrich Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-0441 

E-Mail: Hilbrich.Sara@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Michelle Schutz Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-7374 

E-Mail: Schutz.Michelle@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF21

 View Related Documents

Title: Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Estuaries and Coastal Waters

Abstract: EPA is under a Consent Decree deadline to promulgate numeric nutrient water quality criteria (which are elements

of water quality standards) for the State of Florida's estuaries and coastal waters, flowing waters in south Florida (including

canals), and the downstream protection values for flowing waters into estuaries by August 15, 2012. The Consent Decree states

that EPA will sign for publication in the federal register proposed criteria for these three categories by November 14, 2011 and

will sign for publication in the federal register a final rule by August 15, 2012. EPA made a determination on January 14, 2009

that numeric nutrient water quality criteria are necessary for the state to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 11/14/2011 

Other Judicial 08/15/2012 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2011 

Final Action 08/00/2012 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Erica Fleisig Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4305T

Washington , DC 20460 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

43
Phone: 202 566-1057 

E-Mail: Fleisig.Erica@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Amy Newman Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4305T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0723 

E-Mail: Newman.Amy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF22

 View Related Documents

Title: Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) Information Collection Request Rule

Abstract: Under the authority of section 308 of the CWA, EPA is proposing a rule to collect facility information from all

Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), which will provide a CAFO inventory and assist in implementing the 2008

CAFO rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Under the authority of section 308 of the CWA, EPA is proposing a rule to collect facility information

from all CAFOs, which will provide a CAFO inventory and assist in implementing the 2008 CAFO rule.

Legal Basis: EPA is proposing a rule to collect facility information from all CAFOs under the authority of section 308 of the

CWA.

Alternatives: 

Costs and Benefits: 

Risks: 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2011 

Final Action 05/00/2012 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Becky Mitschele Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-6418 

E-Mail: Mitschele.Becky@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: George Utting Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-0744 

E-Mail: utting.george@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

44
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF23

 View Related Documents

Title: Withdrawal of Certain Federal Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria Applicable to Wisconsin

Abstract: In 1997, Wisconsin developed revised water quality criteria to comply with the 1995 Great Lakes Initiative, a multistate comprehensive plan to restore the health of the Great Lakes Basin. In 2000, EPA disapproved a subset of Wisconsin’s

criteria, including its chronic and acute aquatic life criteria for copper and nickel, and chronic aquatic life criteria for endrin and

selenium. As a result of the disapproval, EPA promulgated standards in 2000 to address chronic and acute aquatic life criteria

for copper and nickel (40 CFR section 132.6(f)) and chronic aquatic life criteria for endrin and selenium (40 CFR section

132.6(g)) to apply to the waters of the Great Lakes System in the State of Wisconsin. Wisconsin began rulemaking in January

2008 to address the six aquatic life criteria for these four pollutants and in December 2008, the State finalized its criteria. EPA

approved Wisconsin’s aquatic life water quality criteria on July 1, 2009, with the exception of the chronic aquatic life criterion for

selenium for waters designated by Wisconsin as “Limited Forage Fish” aquatic life use. EPA is proposing to withdraw its aquatic

life criteria for chronic and acute copper and nickel (40 CFR section 132.6(f)) and chronic endrin (40 CFR section 132.6(g)) in all

surface waters of Wisconsin. EPA is also proposing to revise the chronic aquatic life criterion for selenium (40 CFR section

132.6(g)) to apply exclusively to areas designated by Wisconsin as “Limited Forage Fish” aquatic life use. Wisconsin

Department of Natural Resources has adequately demonstrated that its aquatic life water quality criteria for copper (acute and

chronic), nickel (acute and chronic), endrin (chronic), and selenium (chronic) protect all waters of the state at a level consistent

with the federal requirements under the Clean Water Act, with the exception of selenium (chronic) in Limited Forage Fish”

waters. The proposed federal regulation withdrawal will enable Wisconsin to implement its EPA-approved aquatic life criteria in

all marine waters of the State.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 132.6(f); 40 CFR 132.6(g) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1751 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Claudia Fabiano Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4305T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0446 

E-Mail: Fabiano.Claudia@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Francine Norling Environmental Protection Agency

Water

WQ-16J

Chicago , IL 60604 

Phone: 312 886-0271 

E-Mail: Norling.Francine@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF25

 View Related Documents

Title: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Application and Program Updates Rule

Abstract: EPA plans to update specific elements of the existing NPDES regulations in order to better harmonize regulations

and application forms, improve permit documentation and transparency and provide clarifications to the existing regulations.

This effort will deal with any “legacy” application, permitting, monitoring, and reporting requirements that have become obsolete

or outdated due to programmatic and technical changes that have occurred over the past 20 years. Specifically, the focus will

be on revising the NPDES permit application forms to specifically include all final agency data standards, improve the

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

45
consistency between the application forms, update the applications to better reflect current program practices, and specifically

incorporate new program areas into the forms (e.g. CWA section 316(b) requirements for cooling water intake structures). This

endeavor will also deal with other program elements including permit documentation procedures to improve the quality and

transparency of permit development.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Final Action 04/00/2012 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Kathryn Kelley Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-7004 

E-Mail: Kelley.Kathryn@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: David Hair Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-2287 

E-Mail: Hair.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AC84

 View Related Documents

Title: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Use of Sufficiently Sensitive Test Methods for Permit

Applications and Reporting

Abstract: EPA is launching an effort to update specific elements of the existing NPDES regulations in order to provide

clarifications related to the NPDES permit application and NPDES permit monitoring analytical detection level requirements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 136 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA 301; 33 USC 1312 CWA 302; 33 USC 1314 CWA 304; 33 USC 1316 CWA 306; 33

USC 1318 CWA 308; 33 USC 1342 CWA 402; 33 USC 1361 CWA 501

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/23/2010 75 FR 35712 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-15254.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

46
Jurisdictions Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Kathryn Kelley Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-7004 

E-Mail: Kelley.Kathryn@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: David Hair Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-2287 

E-Mail: Hair.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AE69

 View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Airport Deicing Operations

Abstract: In EPA’s 2004 Effluent Guidelines plan, the agency announced that it would begin development of a regulation to

control the pollutants discharged from airport deicing operations. Based on preliminary study and on public comments,

discharges from deicing operations have the potential to cause fish kills, algae blooms, and contamination to surface or ground

waters. A source of these pollutants is aircraft deicing fluid that is not properly recaptured, re-used, or treated before discharge.

Deicing agents typically contain glycols and additives. There is great disparity among airports in terms of wastewater treatment

and also in terms of discharge permits.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 449 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CWA 301; CWA 304; CWA 306; CWA 307; CWA 308; CWA 402; CWA 501

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/28/2009 74 FR 44675 

Final Action 03/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a16b99; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOW-2004-0038

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/waterscience/guide/airport

Sectors Affected: 488119

Agency Contact: Eric Strassler Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1026 

FAX: 202 566-1053

E-Mail: Strassler.Eric@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Brian D'Amico Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

47
Phone: 202 566-1069 

FAX: 202 566-1053

E-Mail: damico.brian@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AE98

 View Related Documents

Title: Federal Requirements Under the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program for Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Geologic

Sequestration (GS) Wells

Abstract: Geologic Sequestration (GS) is a key climate change mitigation technology. During GS, CO2 captured from an

emission source such as a coal-fired electric power plant, is injected into deep subsurface rock formations for long term storage.

The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) requires EPA to regulate the injection of fluid, including gases such as CO2, to prevent

the endangerment of underground sources of drinking water (USDWs) and public health. In March 2007, EPA issued guidance

to assist State and EPA Regional Underground Injection Control (UIC) Programs in processing permit applications for pilot and

other demonstration-scale GS projects as Class V UIC experimental technology wells. In addition, EPA committed to developing

a long term management framework for permitting commercial scale GS projects. Part of this long term management framework

included regulations for owners and operators of wells injecting CO2. New regulations for GS wells would provide a consistent

framework for permitting GS wells to ensure that CO2 injection does not endanger underground sources of drinking water. EPA

proposed regulations for GS wells on July 25, 2008. In addition, in August 2009 EPA published a Notice of Data Availability that

presented new information and data related to GS.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 144 to 146 (proposed revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )

Legal Authority: 42 USC 300h et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/25/2008 73 FR 43491 

NODA 08/31/2009 74 FR 44802 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064806955cf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOW-2008-0390

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/uic/wells_sequestration.html

Agency Contact: Suzanne Kelly Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4606M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3887 

E-Mail: kelly.suzanne@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lee Whitehurst Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4606M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3896 

E-Mail: whitehurst.lee@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

48
Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF06

 View Related Documents

Title: 2010 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan

Abstract: The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires EPA to establish national technology-based regulations known as “effluent

limitations guidelines and standards” to reduce pollutant discharges from categories of industrial facilities. EPA similarly

establishes technology-based regulations, termed “pretreatment standards,” to reduce indirect pollutant discharges—those that

are discharged to publicly-owned treatment works. The CWA also specifies effluent guideline planning and review requirements.

There are different requirements for direct and indirect dischargers, but both specify annual review of promulgated effluent

guidelines and pretreatment standards. One requirement is publication of an Effluent Guidelines Program Plan every two years.

CWA section 304(m) specifies that the Plan must: (1) establish a schedule for the annual review and revision of promulgated

effluent guidelines, (2) identify categories of sources discharging toxic or non-conventional pollutants for which guidelines have

not previously been published (“new categories”); and (3) establish a schedule for the promulgation of effluent guidelines

identified under (2). We anticipate that the 2010 Plan will describe the results of the 2010 annual review, including, to the extent

possible: (1) the outcome of the screening process; (2) EPA’s selection of industrial categories for further study; and (3) the

rationale for selecting categories for further study. The 2010 Plan will also summarize activities and accomplishments for studies

of categories that were identified in the 2008 Final Plan.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CWA 304; CWA 306; CWA 307

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 12/31/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Preliminary Plan 12/28/2009 74 FR 68599 

Final Plan 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Preliminary Plan - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-

30625.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0517

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/guide/304m

Agency Contact: William Swietlik Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1129 

FAX: 202 566-1053

E-Mail: swietlik.william@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ahmar Siddiqui Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1044 

FAX: 202 566-1053

E-Mail: Siddiqui.Ahmar@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF09

 View Related Documents

Title: Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; Analysis and

Sampling Procedures

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

49
Abstract: This regulatory action would amend "Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants" at 40

CFR part 136 to approve test procedures (analytical methods) for use by testing laboratories for water monitoring. These test

procedures are used to implement the NPDES program unless an alternate procedure is approved by a Regional Administrator.

The regulation would also revise, clarify, and correct errors and ambiguities in existing methods and the water monitoring

regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136; 40 CFR 423; 40 CFR 430; 40 CFR 435 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251; 33 USC 1314(h); 33 USC 1361(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/23/2010 75 FR 58024 

NPRM Comment Period End 11/22/2010 

Final Action 06/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0192

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental

Jurisdictions Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/waterscience/methods/possibleupdates.html

Agency Contact: Meghan Hessenauer Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1040 

FAX: 202 566-1053

E-Mail: Hessenauer.Meghan@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lemuel Walker Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1077 

E-Mail: Walker.Lemuel@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF11

 View Related Documents

Title: Water Quality Standards (Numeric Nutrient Criteria) for Florida's Lakes and Flowing Waters

Abstract: EPA is under a Consent Decree deadline to promulgate numeric nutrient water quality criteria (which are elements

of water quality standards) for the State of Florida's lakes and flowing waters by October 15, 2010. EPA made a determination

on January 14, 2009 that numeric nutrient water quality criteria are necessary for the state to meet the requirements of the

Clean Water Act (CWA). In June 2010, EPA and Plaintiffs filed a joint notice with the Court extending the deadlines for

promulgating numeric nutrient criteria for Florida's estuaries and coastal waters , flowing waters in south Florida (including

canals), and the downstream protection values for flowing waters into estuaries. The new deadlines are November 14, 2011 for

proposing the estuarine and coastal waters criteria, and August 15, 2012 for publishing a final rule for these three categories.

The original deadline of October 15, 2010 remains in place for EPA to finalize numeric nutrient criteria for Florida's lakes and

other flowing waters (streams and springs).

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

50
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial Consent Decree Deadline 10/15/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/26/2010 75 FR 4174 

Supplemental NODA 08/03/2010 75 FR 45579 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a83e17;

http://epa.gov/waterscience/standards; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0596

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/standards/rules/florida

Agency Contact: Danielle Salvaterra Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4305T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1631 

E-Mail: Salvaterra.Danielle@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Claudia Fabiano Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4305T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0446 

E-Mail: Fabiano.Claudia@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AA94

 View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Radon

Abstract: In 1999, EPA proposed regulations for radon which provide flexibility in how to manage the health risks from radon

in drinking water. The proposal was based on the unique framework in the 1996 SDWA. The proposed regulation would provide

for either a maximum contaminant level (MCL), or an alternative maximum contaminant level (AMCL) with a multimedia

mitigation (MMM) program to address radon in indoor air. Under the proposal, public water systems in States that adopted

qualifying MMM programs would be subject to the AMCL, while those in States that did not adopt such programs would be

subject to the MCL.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: State, Local, Or Tribal Governments

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f, et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

ANPRM 09/30/1986 51 FR 34836 

NPRM original 07/18/1991 56 FR 33050 

Notice99 02/26/1999 64 FR 9560 

NPRM 11/02/1999 64 FR 59246 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

51
Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0041

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business;

Governmental Jurisdictions

Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/radon.html

Sectors Affected: 22131

Agency Contact: Rebecca Allen Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4607M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-4689 

FAX: 202 564-3760

E-Mail: Allen.Rebeccak@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Eric Burneson Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4607M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-5250 

E-Mail: burneson.eric@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AB85

 View Related Documents

Title: Shore Protection Act, Section 4103(b) Regulations

Abstract: This rule proposed to implement provisions of the Shore Protection Act (SPA) designed to prevent the deposit of

municipal and commercial waste into U.S. coastal waters. This rule proposed minimum waste handling practices for vessels and

waste handling facilities involved in the transport of municipal or commercial wastes in the coastal waters of the United States.

Local governments and businesses involved with the vessel transportation and shore side handling of these wastes would be

affected by this rule. Currently no tribes are known to be involved in waste handling of this type; therefore none would be

affected by this rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 237 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 2601 Shore Protection Act of 1988; PL 100-688 4103(b)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 08/30/1994 59 FR 44798 

Additional Information: SAN No. 2820

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental

Jurisdictions Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: David Redford Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4504T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1288 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

52
FAX: 202 566-1546

E-Mail: Redford.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AC13

 View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Aldicarb

Abstract: EPA promulgated MCLs for aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide, and aldicarb sulfone in the Phase II rulemaking in 1991 at

levels of 0.003, 0.004, and 0.002 ug/l, respectively. In response to an administrative petition from the manufacturer RhonePoulenc, the Agency issued an administrative stay of the effective date. EPA will reexamine risk assessment and occurrence

data on aldicarb and make a determination of what further action is appropriate.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 3238

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental

Jurisdictions; Organizations Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 22131

Agency Contact: Karen Wirth Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4607M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-5246 

FAX: 202 564-3760

E-Mail: wirth.karen@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD09

 View Related Documents

Title: Test Procedures for the Analysis of Co-Planar and Mono-Ortho-Substituted Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Under

the Clean Water Act

Abstract: The proposal would amend the Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40

CFR parts 136 and 503 to approve EPA Method 1668 for the congener-specific determination of co-planar and mono-orthosubstituted polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in effluent, ambient water, and sewage sludge. This method is necessary for the

implementation of water quality-based permit conditions under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) of

the Clean Water Act. Water quality-based permit conditions are necessary when technology-based controls do not ensure that a

particular water body would meet the State's water quality standard. At present there is no promulgated EPA analytical method

for determination of these PCBs at the levels of concern.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

53
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1361(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4049

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental

Jurisdictions Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/methods

Agency Contact: Lemuel Walker Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1077 

E-Mail: Walker.Lemuel@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD39

 View Related Documents

Title: Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces—Phase II

Abstract: This action is Phase II of implementing regulations on Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the

Armed Forces. In 1996 the Clean Water Act was amended to create section 312(n), Uniform National Discharge Standards for

Vessels of the Armed Forces. Section 312(n) directs EPA and DOD to work together to provide Armed Forces vessels with a

nationally uniform set of discharge standards, which preempt State discharge standards for these vessels. The purpose of the

statute is to allow DOD to plan, design and build environmentally sound vessels, to encourage innovative pollution control

technology, and to improve operational flexibility. EPA and DOD jointly promulgated Phase I of these regulations, 40 CFR part

1700, on May 10, 1999 (64 FR 25126). The Phase I rulemaking concluded that 25 discharges from Armed Forces vessels would

require control devices. Some of these discharges (such as bilge water) have the potential to introduce oil or other organics into

receiving waters; some (such as hull coating leachate) have the potential to introduce copper or other metals; and some (such

as ballast water) have the potential to introduce nonindigenous invasive aquatic species. Phase II will establish performance

standards for control devices for these 25 discharges. The Phase II performance standards will be promulgated in five

"batches." Each batch will address several performance standards. Once DOD implements rules for achieving the standards set

in Phase II, covered discharges from Armed Forces vessels will be required to meet these standards, and will not be subject to

discharge standards established by States.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1700 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1322; 33 USC 1361

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory CWA 312(n)(5)(B)(i) 05/10/2001 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2013 

Final Action 04/00/2014 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4357

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local;

State; Tribal

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

54
Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/rules/UNDS,

http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/regulatory/unds/batchruleprocess.html,

Agency Contact: Brian Rappoli Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4504T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1548 

E-Mail: Rappoli.Brian@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Jonathan Amson Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4504T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1276 

FAX: 202 566-1546

E-Mail: Amson.Jonathan@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD40

 View Related Documents

Title: Underground Injection Control: Update of State Programs

Abstract: The regulations at 40 CFR part 147 codify each State's UIC program description and incorporates by reference the

rules and regulations that the respective primacy state will implement. This includes codifying programs upon which EPA directly

implements. The primary reason for part 147 is to incorporate by reference into the Code of Federal Regulations the State

program authorities and regulations so EPA may bring a direct enforcement action if the state fails to comply with the state UIC

program. This update is necessary to ensure that the CFR accurately reflects current approved State UIC programs and that

requirements of those programs are federally enforceable. EPA Regional Offices will be submitting State revision packages as

they are completed. Part 147 will then be updated in several stages. This is the first stage. This effort should have no impact on

the regulated community because EPA will merely be incorporating by reference elements of already approved State programs.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 147 (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 300h-1 SDWA 1422; 42 USC 300h-4 SDWA 1425

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4236

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Robert-Eu Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4606M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3895 

FAX: 202 564-3756

E-Mail: Smith.Robert-Eu@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Jeff Jollie Environmental Protection Agency

Water

WTR9

Washington , DC 20460 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

55
Phone: 202 564-3886 

FAX: 415 947-3549

E-Mail: Jollie.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD54

 View Related Documents

Title: National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR): Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) and Technical

Corrections to the NSDWR

Abstract: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) was primarily used as an automobile fuel additive, introduced in the late 1970s

during lead phase-out as an octane enhancer. Production increased in the 1990s to meet the requirement of the federal

Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) and Oxyfuels programs required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. However, MTBE has

been detected in ground water and drinking water in a number of states due to leaking underground storage tanks and leaking

pipelines. At least 25 states passed laws banning or limiting MTBE use, and MTBE use declined after 1999. Refiners removed

MTBE from gasoline in 2006. Although most drinking water detections are at levels well below health concern, MTBE's

distinctive turpentine-like taste and odor can be detected at low levels. Presently, the Agency is revising the health assessment

for MTBE.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 143 (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4404

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 22131

Agency Contact: Wynne Miller Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4607M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-4887 

FAX: 202 564-3760

E-Mail: miller.wynne@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD87

 View Related Documents

Title: Statement of Policy -- NPDES Permit Requirements for Peak Wet Weather Discharges From Publicly Owned Treatment

Work Treatment Plants Serving Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems

Abstract: During periods of wet weather, wastewater flows received by municipal sewage treatment plants can significantly

increase, which can create operational challenges for sewage treatment facilities. Where peak flows approach or exceed the

design capacity of a treatment plant they can seriously reduce treatment efficiency or damage treatment units. In addition to

hydraulic concerns, wastewater associated with peak flows may have low organic strength, which can also decrease treatment

efficiencies. One engineering practice that some facilities use to protect biological treatment units from damage and to prevent

overflows and backups elsewhere in the system is referred to as wet weather blending. Wet weather blending occurs during

peak wet weather flow events when flows that exceed the capacity of the biological units are routed around the biological units

and blended with effluent from the biological units prior to discharge. Regulatory agencies, sewage treatment plant operators,

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

56
and representatives of environmental advocacy groups have expressed uncertainty about National Pollutant Discharge

Elimination System (NPDES) requirements addressing such situations. EPA requested public comment on a proposed policy

published on November 7, 2003. EPA did not finalize the policy. The policy options associated with this activity are still under

review.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.41(m) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311; 33 USC 1318; 33 USC 1342; 33 USC 1361

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Policy 00/00/0000 

1st Draft Policy 11/07/2003 68 FR 63042 

2nd Draft Policy 12/22/2005 70 FR 76013 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2005-0523

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/npdes

Sectors Affected: 22132

Agency Contact: Kevin Weiss Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-0742 

FAX: 202 564-6392

E-Mail: weiss.kevin@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Mohammed Billah Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-0729 

FAX: 202 564-0717

E-Mail: Billah.Mohammed@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD94

 View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule

Abstract: EPA is revising the Total Coliform Rule (TCR), which was published in 1989. The original TCR, promulgated in

1989, protects human health by requiring microbial monitoring in drinking water distribution systems. Since then, EPA has

gained a better understanding of total coliforms as an indicator of contamination in the distribution system. EPA convened a

Federal Advisory Committee to recommend revisions to the TCR. In September 2008, members of the Federal Advisory

Committee signed an agreement in principle (AIP), which recommended revisions to the TCR, as well as research and

information collection needed to better understand potential public health impacts from conditions in the distribution system and

control of microbial drinking water contamination. In accordance with commitments EPA agreed to in the AIP, EPA has drafted

a proposed rule that has the same elements and effects as the recommendations in the AIP. The proposed rule requires water

systems to find and fix pathways to contamination when monitoring results indicate that microbial contamination is present,

develops specific criteria for public water systems to qualify for and stay on reduced monitoring, and aims to improve consumer

understanding and confidence by making required public notices about the drinking water quality more meaningful.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

57
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 08/08/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice of Agreement in Principle 01/13/2009 74 FR 1683 

NPRM 07/14/2010 75 FR 40926 

Notice - Public Meeting 08/16/2010 75 FR 49930 

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 08/31/2010 75 FR 53267 

Final Action 11/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice of Agreement in Principle - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAWATER/2009/January/Day-13/w469.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0878

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/safewater/disinfection/tcr/regulation_revisions.html

Sectors Affected: 2213

Agency Contact: Sean Conley Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4607M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1781 

FAX: 202 564-3767

E-Mail: Conley.Sean@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Thomas Grubbs Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4607M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-5262 

FAX: 202 564-3767

E-Mail: Grubbs.Thomas@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AE82

 View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Chlorine and Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Manufacturing Process

Abstract: EPA is considering revising the existing effluent guidelines and standards for the manufacture of chlorinated

hydrocarbons and elemental chlorine. We refer to this industrial segment as chlorine and chlorinated hydrocarbons

manufacturing, or CCH. Currently, wastewater discharges from chlorinated hydrocarbons manufacturing are subject to the

Organic Chemicals, Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers (OCPSF) Point Source Category (40 CFR part 414). The wastewater

discharges from chlorine manufacturing through the chlor-alkali manufacturing process are subject to the Inorganic Chemicals

Point Source Category (40 CFR part 415). Based on a preliminary study, discharges from vinyl chloride and chlor-alkali

manufacturing might contain significant quantities of toxic pollutants, including dioxin. Since this effluent guidelines review

began, EPA has gathered industry data through site visits and sampling and also developed a survey to collect detailed sitespecific data from all known CCH manufacturers. Because CCH member companies are currently collecting data to characterize

baseline discharge quantities of dioxin, at this time EPA is deferring its efforts to survey the CCH industry.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 414 (Revision); 40 CFR 415 (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

58
Legal Authority: CWA301; CWA304; CWA306; CWA307; CWA308; CWA501

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2005-0012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/waterscience/guide/cch/

Sectors Affected: 325181; 325188; 325199; 325211

Agency Contact: Samantha Lewis Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1058 

FAX: 202 566-1053

E-Mail: lewis.samantha@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Janet Goodwin Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1060 

E-Mail: Goodwin.Janet@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF03

 View Related Documents

Title: Development of Best Management Practices for Recreational Boats Under Section 312(o) of the Clean Water Act

Abstract: This action is for the development of regulations by EPA to implement the Clean Boating Act (Public Law 110-288),

which was signed by the President on July 29, 2008. The Clean Boating Act amends section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)

to exclude recreational vessels from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitting requirements. In addition, it

adds a new CWA section 312(o) directing EPA to develop regulations that identify the discharges incidental to the normal

operation of recreational vessels (other than a discharge of sewage) for which it is reasonable and practicable to develop

management practices to mitigate adverse impacts on waters of the United States. The regulations also need to include those

management practices, including performance standards for each such practice. Following promulgation of the EPA

performance standards, new CWA section 312(o) directs the Coast Guard to promulgate regulations governing the design,

construction, installation, and use of the management practices. Following promulgation of the Coast Guard regulations, the

Clean Boating Act prohibits the operation of a recreational vessel or any discharge incidental to their normal operation in waters

of the United States and waters of the contiguous zone (i.e., 12 miles into the ocean), unless the vessel owner or operator is

using an applicable management practice meeting the EPA-developed performance standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 140 (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Clean Boating Act requires promulgation w/in 1 year of enactment. 07/29/2009 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2013 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

59
Final Action 04/00/2014 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5311

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Brian Rappoli Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4504T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1548 

E-Mail: Rappoli.Brian@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: John Lishman Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4504T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1364 

E-Mail: Lishman.John@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF05

 View Related Documents

Title: Oil and Gas Construction Stormwater Rule

Abstract: On June 12, 2006, EPA published a final rule to address a new provision added by the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

The 2006 regulation effectively exempted from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements

stormwater discharges of sediment from construction activities associated with oil and gas exploration, production, processing,

or treatment operations or transmission facilities unless the relevant facility had a discharge of stormwater resulting in a

discharge of a reportable quantity of oil or hazardous substances. Shortly thereafter, the Natural Resources Defense Council

(NRDC) petitioned the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) for direct review of EPA's action. On May 23, 2008, the

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in NRDC v. U.S. EPA, 526 F.3d 591 (9th Cir. 2008), vacating EPA's 2006 oil

and gas construction stormwater regulation. On July 21, 2008, EPA filed a petition for rehearing in this case. On November 3,

2008, the Ninth Circuit issued its order denying EPA’s request for rehearing of the Court’s decision vacating EPA's 2006 oil and

gas construction stormwater regulation. This direct final rule will (1) remove the codified 2006 rule from the Code of Federal

Regulations consistent with the court vacatur and (2) codify the revised 2005 Energy Policy Act definition of "oil and gas

exploration, production, processing, treatment, and transmission operations" to clarify that certain uncontaminated discharges

from oil and gas construction activities are exempt from permitting as identified in section 402(I)(2) of the Clean Water Act.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.26(a)(2)(ii) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1342(l) and 1362(24)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory The oil and gas rule court-ordered vacatur took effect on November 19,

2008. 11/19/2008 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5330

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Bryan Rittenhouse Environmental Protection Agency

Water

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

60
4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-0577 

FAX: 202 564-6431

E-Mail: Rittenhouse.Bryan@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Connie Bosma Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-6773 

FAX: 202 564-6392

E-Mail: Bosma.Connie@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF08

 View Related Documents

Title: Perchlorate Regulatory Determination

Abstract: The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) requires EPA to make determinations every five years of whether to regulate

at least five contaminants on its Contaminant Candidate List (CCL). A regulatory determination is a formal decision on whether

EPA should initiate a rulemaking process to develop a national primary drinking water regulation for a specific contaminant. EPA

included perchlorate on the first and second CCLs that were published in the Federal Register on March 2, 1998 (63 FR 10273)

and February 24, 2005 (70 FR 9071). On October 10, 2008, EPA published a preliminary regulatory determination for

perchlorate in drinking water (73 FR 60262). EPA received comments from over 32,000 individuals and organizations in

response to this notice. EPA has reviewed the information in these comments and has re-evaluated the scientific information

regarding the perchlorate regulatory determination. To assure transparency in its decision making process, on August 19, 2009,

EPA published a supplemental request for comments on its re-evaluation of the scientific data (74 FR 41883). EPA will make a

final determination for perchlorate after review and consideration of public comments received on the supplemental request for

comment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 300g-1(b)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Determination 00/00/0000 

Preliminary Determination 10/10/2008 73 FR 60262 

Supplemental Notice 08/19/2009 74 FR 41883 

Extension of Comment Period 09/23/2009 74 FR 48541 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Preliminary Determination -

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-24042.pdf; Split from RIN 2040-AE60.; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2007-

0068

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/safewater/ccl/index.html

Related RINs: Related to 2040-AE60

Agency Contact: Eric Burneson Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4607M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-5250 

E-Mail: burneson.eric@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

61
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF14

 View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category

Abstract: EPA establishes national technology-based regulations, called effluent guidelines, to reduce discharges of

pollutants from industries to waters of the U.S. and publicly owned treatment works. These requirements are incorporated into

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge permits issued by EPA and states. The steam electric

effluent guidelines apply to steam electric power plants using nuclear or fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and natural gas. There are

about 1,200 nuclear- and fossil-fueled steam electric power plants nationwide; approximately 500 of these power plants are

coal-fired. In a study completed in 2009, EPA found that the current regulations, which were last updated in 1982, do not

adequately address the pollutants being discharged and have not kept pace with changes that have occurred in the electric

power industry over the last three decades. The rulemaking will address discharges from ash ponds and flue gas desulfurization

(FGD) air pollution controls, as well as other power plant waste streams. Power plant discharges can have major impacts on

water quality, including reduced organism abundance and species diversity, contamination of drinking water sources, and other

effects. Pollutants of concern include metals (e.g., mercury, arsenic and selenium), nutrients, and total dissolved solids.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 423 Revision (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CWA301; CWA304; CWA306; CWA307; CWA308; CWA402; CWA501

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2012 

Final Action 01/00/2014 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/guide/steam

Agency Contact: Ronald Jordan Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4303T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1003 

FAX: 202 566-1053

E-Mail: Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF15

 View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Regulatory Revisions

Abstract: EPA promulgated a set of short-term regulatory revisions and clarifications on October 10, 2007, to strengthen

implementation of the existing Lead and Copper Rule. In developing the short-term revisions, EPA identified several regulatory

changes to be considered as part of identifying more comprehensive changes to the rule. These considerations are longer-term

in nature as they require additional data collection, research, analysis, and stakeholder involvement to support decisions. This

action addresses the remaining regulatory revisions to be completed in the 2013 timeframe. Regulatory changes to be

addressed may include changes to flushing guidance and sample collection following a partial lead service line replacement;

lead service line replacement programs; potential changes to the sample site selection criteria for lead and copper sites;

guidance on new corrosion control treatments; tap sampling issues including pre-stagnation flushing, aerator removal, and

maximum stagnation times; and consecutive water systems.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

62
Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2012 

Final Action 12/00/2013 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5423

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Jeffrey Kempic Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4607M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-4880 

FAX: 202 564-3760

E-Mail: Kempic.Jeffrey@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF20

 View Related Documents

Title: Revised Regulations for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Abstract: EPA and authorized states administer the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program for

concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), as revised by nationally-applicable rules in 2003 and 2008. On May 12, 2009,

President Barack Obama issued Executive Order 13508 on Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration. Agriculture is the

single largest contributor of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution to the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Manure is the

source of about half of the nutrient loading from agriculture. As directed under the Executive Order, EPA developed a strategy,

in consultation with the States and key stakeholders, for protecting water quality in the Chesapeake Bay. The proposed action

might establish broader regulatory authority in the Bay and additional requirements for manure management for CAFOs in the

Bay. Consistent with the draft joint federal strategy, the scope of the proposed rule may consider expanding the universe of

CAFOs and requiring more stringent standards for permits (e.g. better nutrient management planning). Additionally, options for

a streamlined designation process of smaller facilities as CAFOs and better off-site manure management may be considered for

the Bay or nationally. During the rulemaking process, EPA will consider how effectively Chesapeake Bay states strengthen their

pollution control programs to achieve the reductions in nutrient and sediment pollution needed to meet Bay water quality

standards. The Chesapeake Bay CAFO Rule is being developed to ensure Regional and State Water NPDES Permitting

Authorities have sufficient tools to reduce discharges of manure from these facilities.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial CBF settlement negotiations are still active. This date is just a

placeholder. Publically, we said we would propose in 2012. 01/01/2012 

Other Judicial CBF negotiations are still active. This date is just a placeholder.

Publically, we said we would take final action late 2013. 12/31/2013 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2012 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

63
Final Action 06/00/2014 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5443

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Ross Brennan Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3248 

E-Mail: Brennan.Ross@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: George Utting Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4203M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-0744 

E-Mail: utting.george@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AE87

 View Related Documents

Title: Guidance for Implementing the Methylmercury Water Quality Criterion

Abstract: In the 2001 Federal Register notice of the availability of EPA’s recommended water quality criterion for

methylmercury, EPA stated that it would develop associated procedures and guidance for implementing the criterion. For states

and authorized tribes exercising responsibility under CWA section 303(c), this document provides technical guidance on how

they might want to use the recommended 2001 fish tissue-based criterion to develop and implement their own water quality

standards for methylmercury. The guidance addresses topics including adoption and revision of standards, monitoring,

waterbody assessment, water quality standards issues, TMDL development, and NPDES permitting. Since atmospheric

deposition is considered to be a major source of mercury for many waterbodies, implementing this criterion involves coordination

across media and program areas.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: None (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final - Revision to 2009 Guidance 04/30/2010 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0656

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/methylmercury

Agency Contact: Holly Green Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4305T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0651 

E-Mail: Holly.green@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

64
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF19

 View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Radionuclides

Abstract: On December 7, 2000 (65 FR 76708), EPA promulgated final revised and/or new national primary drinking water

regulations (NPDWRs) for nonradon radionuclides as authorized by the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). In this action, referred

to as the Radionuclides Rule, EPA promulgated maximum contaminant level goals (MCLGs), maximum contaminant levels

(MCLs), monitoring, reporting, and public notification requirements for gross alpha particle activity, combined radium-226 and

228, beta particle and photon activity and uranium. The Radionuclides Rule became effective on December 8, 2003. Pursuant to

section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, EPA has reviewed this rule to determine if it should be continued without change,

or should be rescinded or amended to minimize adverse economic impacts on small entities. This review was announced in the

Regulatory Agenda on April 26, 2010 (75 FR 21883). As part of this review, EPA considered, and solicited comments on, the

following factors: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received concerning the rule; (3)

the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal, State, or local

government rules; and (5) the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area

affected by the rule. EPA received five comment letters. The results of EPA’s review have been summarized in a report and

placed in the rulemaking docket (docket number EPA-HQ-OW-2010- 0166 at www.regulations.gov). These results are briefly

summarized here. There was consensus among the commenters about the continued need for the Radionuclides Rule, because

it serves as an important tool to protect the health of people who get their drinking water from public systems using sources of

water with high levels of radionuclides. While none of the commenters expressed a need to rescind the rule, most of the

comments were aimed at suggesting that the Agency make clarifications in certain areas of the rule to aid small entities in its

rule compliance. After reviewing all the comments regarding this Section 610 review the Agency has concluded that revisions or

amendments to the Radionuclides rule are not warranted at this time. However, EPA is evaluating the need to provide

additional guidance and clarification on those issues raised by the commenters to assist in the rule implementation. The Agency

bases its decision to not revise or amend the rule at this time on the analysis conducted during the promulgation of the rule

which were aimed at reducing economic burden on small entities. Among the measures that the Agency took to minimize

impacts on small entities are: (1) The selection of a less stringent MCL for uranium, (2) a reduction in the overall monitoring

frequencies for systems with radionuclides levels less than the MCL, (3) allowance of grandfathered data and State monitoring

discretion for determining the initial monitoring baseline, and (4) the exclusion of nontransient, non-community water systems

from the radionuclides regulations. EPA will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of the Radionuclides rule and the potential to

decrease the rule’s implementation burden within the framework provided by the SDWA and other agency initiatives. EPA

continues to view the NPDWRs for radionuclides as important to ensure and protect the health of consumers served by public

drinking water systems and intends to continue to require compliance with these NPDWRs.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 9, 141, 142 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 5 USC 610

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 12/07/2000 65 FR 76708 

Begin Review 04/26/2010 75 FR 21883 

End Comment Period 07/26/2010 

End Review 09/10/2010 

Additional Information: Related to RIN 2040-AC98; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0166

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Stephanie Flaharty Environmental Protection Agency

Water

4601M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-5072 

E-Mail: Flaharty.Stephanie@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Tracy Bone Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

65
Water

4601M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-5257 

FAX: 202 564-3753

E-Mail: Bone.Tracy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AD75

 View Related Documents

Title: National Priorities List for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites: Proposed and Final Rules

Abstract: This action will revise the sites included on the National Priorities List (NPL) of uncontrolled waste sites in the

National Contingency Plan (NCP). CERCLA requires that the Agency revise the NPL at least annually. Periodic revisions will

allow EPA to include sites on the NPL with known or threatened hazardous substance releases and to delete sites that have

been cleaned up.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300.425 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 9605

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final 20 03/06/1998 63 FR 11332 

NPRM 24 03/06/1998 63 FR 11340 

Final 21 07/28/1998 63 FR 40182 

NPRM 25 07/28/1998 63 FR 40247 

Final Tex-Tin 09/18/1998 63 FR 49855 

Final 22 09/29/1998 63 FR 51848 

NPRM 26 09/29/1998 63 FR 51882 

Final 23 01/19/1999 64 FR 2942 

NPRM 27 01/19/1999 64 FR 2950 

NPRM Midnight Mine 02/16/1999 64 FR 7564 

NPRM 28 04/23/1999 64 FR 19968 

NPRM Almeda 05/10/1999 64 FR 24990 

Final 24 05/10/1999 64 FR 24949 

Final 25 07/22/1999 64 FR 39878 

NPRM 29 07/22/1999 64 FR 39886 

Final Pools Prairie 09/17/1999 64 FR 50459 

NPRM 30 10/22/1999 64 FR 56992 

Final Action 10/22/1999 64 FR 56966 

Final 26 02/04/2000 65 FR 5435 

NPRM 31 02/04/2000 65 FR 5468 

Final 28 05/11/2000 65 FR 30482 

NPRM 32 05/11/2000 65 FR 30489 

Final 29 07/27/2000 65 FR 46096 

NPRM 33 07/27/2000 65 FR 46131 

NPRM Alabama/Malone 08/24/2000 65 FR 51567 

Final 30 12/01/2000 65 FR 75179 

NPRM 34 12/01/2000 65 FR 75215 

NPRM 35 01/11/2001 66 FR 2380 

Final 31 06/14/2001 66 FR 32235 

NPRM 36 06/14/2001 66 FR 32287 

Final 32 09/13/2001 66 FR 47583 

NPRM 37 09/13/2001 66 FR 47612 

NPRM Libby/Omaha 02/26/2002 67 FR 8836 

Final adds 19 sites 09/05/2002 67 FR 56757 

NPRM 38 09/05/2002 67 FR 56794 

Final Action 10/24/2002 67 FR 65315 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

66
Final Action 04/30/2003 68 FR 23077 

NPRM 1 04/30/2003 68 FR 23094 

Final 35 (adds 12 sites) 09/29/2003 68 FR 55875 

NPRM 40 03/08/2004 69 FR 10646 

Final 36 07/23/2004 69 FR 43755 

NPRM-Vieques 08/13/2004 69 FR 50115 

Final 37 09/23/2004 69 FR 56949 

NPRM 41 09/23/2004 69 FR 56970 

Final - Vieques 02/11/2005 70 FR 7184 

Final 38 04/27/2005 70 FR 21644 

NPRM 42 04/27/2005 70 FR 21718 

Final 39 09/14/2005 70 FR 54286 

NPRM 43 09/14/2005 70 FR 54327 

Final 40 04/19/2006 71 FR 20016 

NPRM-44 04/19/2006 71 FR 20052 

Final 41 09/27/2006 71 FR 56399 

NPRM 45 09/27/2006 71 FR 56433 

Final 42 03/07/2007 72 FR 10078 

NPRM 46 03/07/2007 72 FR 10105 

Final 43 09/19/2007 72 FR 53463 

NPRM 47 09/19/2007 72 FR 53509 

Final 44 03/19/2008 73 FR 14719 

NPRM 48 03/19/2008 73 FR 14742 

Final 45 09/03/2008 73 FR 51368 

NPRM 49 09/03/2008 73 FR 51393 

Final 46 04/09/2009 74 FR 16126 

NPRM 50 04/09/2009 74 FR 16162 

Final 47 09/23/2009 74 FR 48412 

NPRM-Newtown Creek 09/23/2009 74 FR 48511 

NPRM 51 09/23/2009 74 FR 48504 

Final 48 11/04/2009 74 FR 57085 

Final - Gowanus Canal 03/04/2010 75 FR 9790 

Final 49 03/04/2010 75 FR 9782 

NPRM-52 03/04/2010 75 FR 9843 

Final-Newtown Creek 09/29/2010 75 FR 59983 

Final 50 09/29/2010 75 FR 59975 

NPRM-53 09/29/2010 75 FR 64976 

Final 51 03/00/2011 

NPRM 54 03/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final 50 -

www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=9000006480b63929; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQSFUND-2010-XXXX

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/superfund

Agency Contact: Terry Jeng Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5204P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 603-8852 

FAX: 703 603-9104

E-Mail: jeng.terry@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Doug Ammon Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5204P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 347-8925 

FAX: 703 603-9104

E-Mail: ammon.doug@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

67
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AF08

 View Related Documents

Title: Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act: Modification to the Threshold Planning Quantity Methodology

for the Extremely Hazardous Substances That Are Solids in Solution

Abstract: EPA is considering an alternative approach for the threshold planning quantity (TPQ) for chemicals on the

Extremely Hazardous Substances (EHS) List that are handled as solids in solution. The current TPQ for solids in solution is

based on the assumption that the entire quantity of the solid chemical at a facility could potentially be released to air in the

event of an accident. EPA is considering a rule proposing revisions to the TPQ for solids in solution. EPA is pursuing this

proposal in part based on industry's request to revisit the TPQ rationale for the chemical paraquat dichloride (handled as a solid

in aqueous solution). EPA intends to evaluate various experimental data for accidental air releases of solutions containing solid

chemicals when developing revised TPQs. EPA is also considering public comment on the appropriateness of considering

aerosol size as a factor for potential off-site exposure to communities.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 355 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 1102

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Kathy Franklin Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-7987 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: Franklin.Kathy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8019 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: Jacob.Sicy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG46

 View Related Documents

Title: Revising Underground Storage Tank Regulations--Revisions to Existing Requirements and Additions To Incorporate the

Provisions of the Energy Policy Act

Abstract: The Underground Storage Tank (UST) regulations were first promulgated in 1988 primarily to prevent releases from

retail petroleum marketers (gas stations) and other facilities into the environment. These regulations have reduced the incidents

of contamination. However, there is a need to revise the regulations to incorporate changes to the UST program from the

Energy Policy Act of 2005, as well as to update outdated portions of the regulations due to changes in technology since the

1980s. On August 8, 2005, President Bush signed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct). Title XV, subtitle B of this act (entitled

the Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act of 2005), amends subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, the original

legislation that created the UST program. There are key provisions of the EPAct that apply to states receiving federal UST

funding but do not apply in Indian country, including requirements for secondary containment, operator training and delivery

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

68
prohibition. As a part of this action, EPA plans to develop regulations for secondary containment and operator training to apply

in Indian country and in states that choose not to obtain State Program Approval from EPA in order to achieve more consistent

program results in release prevention and compliance. EPA also plans to develop regulations for delivery prohibition that EPA

may apply in its enforcement actions. Both EPA and tribes recognize the importance of having requirements that can help to

ensure parity in program implementation between states and in Indian Country, which is consistent with EPA's policy. Through

this action, EPA will ensure federal enforceability of the EPAct provisions across the country. EPA will also use our knowledge

of the program gained over the last 20 years to update and revise the regulations to make targeted changes to improve

implementation and prevent UST releases.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 280 to 281 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6991

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 03/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental

Jurisdictions Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oust

Agency Contact: Elizabeth McDermott Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5401P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 603-7175 

FAX: 703 603-0175

E-Mail: McDermott.Elizabeth@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Paul Miller Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5401P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 603-7165 

FAX: 703 603-0175

E-Mail: Miller.Paul@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG56

 View Related Documents

Title: Financial Responsibility Requirements Under CERCLA Section 108(b) for Facilities in the Chemical, Petroleum and

Electric Power Industries

Abstract: Section 108(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of

1980, as amended, establishes certain authorities concerning financial responsibility requirements. The Agency has identified

classes of facilities within the chemical manufacturing industry; the petroleum and coal products manufacturing industry; and the

electric power generation, transmission, and distribution industry as those for which it plans to develop, as necessary, proposed

financial responsibility requirements. EPA intends to include requirements for financial responsibility, as well as notification and

implementation.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq; 42 USC 9608 (b)

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

69
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 01/06/2010 75 FR 816 

Extension of Comment Period 02/04/2010 75 FR 5715 

NPRM 09/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a78958; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQSFUND-2009-0834

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 325; 2211; 324

Agency Contact: Ben Lesser Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5302P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-0314 

E-Mail: Lesser.Ben@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Barbara Foster Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-7057 

E-Mail: Foster.Barbara@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG60

 View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Waste Management Systems: Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste: Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Injectate in Geological Sequestration Activities

Abstract: On July 25, 2008, EPA published a proposed rule under the Safe Drinking Water Act Underground Injection

Control Program to create a new class of injection wells (Class VI) for geological sequestration (GS) of carbon dioxide (CO2).

73 FR 43492. In response to that proposal, EPA received numerous comments asking for clarification on how the Resource

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste requirements apply to CO2 streams. EPA is now considering a

proposed rule under RCRA to explore a number of options, including a conditional exemption from the RCRA requirements for

hazardous CO2 streams in order to facilitate implementation of GS, while protecting human health and the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6903; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6921-24

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Agency is taking this action in order to reduce the uncertainty associated with managing CO2

streams under RCRA subtitle C, which will enable the continued research and deployment of carbon capture storage activities.

Legal Basis: EPA expects the regulations to be proposed under the authority of sections 1004, 2002, 3001, 3002, 3003,

and 3004 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6903, 6912, 6921, 6922, 6923, and 6924.

Alternatives: EPA intends to analyze options for clarifying the applicability of RCRA subtitle C to CO2 streams being

captured, transported, and sequestered in Class VI UIC wells, including a conditional exemption from the hazardous waste

regulations.

Costs and Benefits: The economic impact assessment for this action is presently under development, and there are no

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

70
preliminary estimates of costs or benefits at this time.

Risks: EPA intends to evaluate how requirements under other statutes and programs (for example, Department of

Transportation (DOT) regulations, and EPA's Underground Injection Control Class VI rule) may adequately address potentially

unacceptable risks from the capture, transport, and geologic sequestration of CO2 streams. Therefore, EPA does not expect to

perform a separate risk assessment of those CO2 streams.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 48-49; 22

Agency Contact: Ross Elliott Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8748 

FAX: 703 605-0594

E-Mail: Elliott.Ross@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Mark Baldwin Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-0157 

E-Mail: Baldwin.Mark@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG61

 View Related Documents

Title: Financial Responsibility Requirements Under CERCLA Section 108(b) for Classes of Facilities in the Hard Rock Mining

Industry

Abstract: Section 108(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of

1980, as amended, establishes certain authorities concerning financial responsibility requirements. The Agency has identified

classes of facilities within the Hard Rock mining industry as those for which financial responsibility requirements will be first

developed. EPA intends to include requirements for financial responsibility, as well as notification and implementation.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq.; 42 USC 9608 (b)

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Agency is currently examining various classes of facilities that may produce, transport, treat, store

or dispose of hazardous substances for development of financial responsibility requirements under CERCLA section 108(b).

Legal Basis: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended.

Alternatives: To be determined.

Costs and Benefits: To be determined.

Risks: To be determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

71
Priority Notice 07/28/2009 74 FR 37213 

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Priority Notice -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064809fc1ff; Split from RIN 2050-AG56.; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0834

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 212

Agency Contact: Ben Lesser Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5302P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-0314 

E-Mail: Lesser.Ben@epa.gov

Agency Contact: David Hockey Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5303P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8846 

E-Mail: Hockey.David@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG64

 View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Chemical Reporting; Community Right-To-Know: Revisions to the Emergency and Hazardous Chemical

Inventory Forms (Tier I and Tier II)

Abstract: The Agency is revising the Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory Forms (Tier I and II) under section 312

of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) to require additional data elements and revise some

existing data elements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 47 CFR 370 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 51; 31-33; 44-45; 48-49; 22; 42

Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8019 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: Jacob.Sicy@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

72
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG44

 View Related Documents

Title: Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Wastes

Abstract: The Agency has proposed to define which non-hazardous secondary materials burned in combustion units are solid

wastes under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). This in turn will assist the Agency in determining which

non-hazardous secondary materials will be subject to the emissions standards proposed under sections 112 and 129 of the

Clean Air Act (CAA). If the secondary material is considered a "solid waste," the unit that burns the non-hazardous secondary

material would be subject to the CAA section 129 requirements. The meaning of "solid waste" as defined under RCRA is

important because CAA section 129, which regulates emissions from sources that combust solid wastes, states that the term

"solid waste" shall have the meaning "established by the Administrator [pursuant to RCRA]."

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 241 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6903(27); 42 USC 6912(a)(1)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 04/29/2010 

Other Judicial 01/16/2011 

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: EPA is preparing to establish new emission standards under CAA sections 112 and 129. In order to

establish these new emission standards, EPA must determine at the federal level which non-hazardous secondary materials are

considered "solid waste." The meaning of solid waste for purposes of these CAA standards is of particular importance since

CAA section 129 states that the term "solid waste" shall have the meaning "established by the Administrator."

Legal Basis: EPA is promulgating this regulation under the authority of sections 2002(a)(1) and 1004(27) of RCRA, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a)(1) and 6903(27). Section 129(a)(1(D) of the CAA directs EPA to establish standards for

Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators (CISWI), which burn solid waste (CAA sec. 129(g)(6), 42 U.S.C. 7429).

Section 129(g)(6) provides that the term, solid waste, is to be established by EPA under RCRA. Section 2002(a)(1) of RCRA

authorizes the Agency to promulgate regulations as are necessary to carry out the functions under the Act. The statutory

definition of "solid waste" is provided in RCRA section 1004(27).

Alternatives: The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposes an "Alternative Approach" that is broader than the

proposed solid waste definition. This alternative may be adopted in the final rule, if warranted by information presented during

the public comment period or otherwise available in the rulemaking record. Under this alternative, most non-hazardous

secondary materials that are burned in a combustion unit would be considered solid wastes. Only fuels or ingredients that are

combusted and remain within the control of the generator and met the legitimacy criteria would not be solid wastes under this

alternative. This approach would not allow discarded materials processed into new product fuels to be considered as nonwastes, or allow for a petition process. This approach would expand the universe of non-hazardous secondary materials that

would be considered to be solid wastes, and thus subject to CAA section 129. The proposed rule also takes comment on an

approach that would classify all non-hazardous secondary materials that are burned in combustion units as solid wastes.

Costs and Benefits: The proposed rule specifies criteria under which non-hazardous secondary materials are considered

solid wastes. Although the final rule will determine which section of the CAA under which a given combustion unit is regulated,

this rule itself will not include any emission standards and will not require changes in the management or use of secondary

materials. Only with the promulgation of the respective rules developed within EPA's Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) would

society realize the costs, benefits, and other impacts. These impacts, therefore, are attributed entirely to the rules being

developed by OAR.

Risks: Air emission risks will be reduced as a result of the current promulgation of three-related rules developed by OAR and

this rule. However, material diversion risks may increase under certain limited scenarios.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 01/02/2009 74 FR 41 

ANPRM Comment Period End 02/02/2009 

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 06/09/2010 75 FR 32682 

NPRM 06/04/2010 75 FR 31843 

NPRM Comment Period End 07/19/2010 

NPRM Comment Period Extended To 08/03/2010 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

73
Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=090000648080b3d3; NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480afbb78, NPRM - Extension of Comment

Period - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail? For information on the proposed CAA emissions

standards for boilers, process heaters, and commercial/industrial solid waste incinerators, see

http://www.epa.gov/airquality/combustion/; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/define/index.htm

Agency Contact: Marc Thomas Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5303P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-0023 

FAX: 703 308-0509

E-Mail: Thomas.Marc@epa.gov

Agency Contact: George Faison Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5303P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-7652 

FAX: 703 308-0509

E-Mail: Faison.George@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG50

 View Related Documents

Title: Oil Pollution Prevention: Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Rule Requirements--Amendments for Milk

Containers

Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) has proposed to amend the Spill Prevention, Control,

and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule to exempt milk containers and associated equipment and appurtenances on farms and in

other dairy operations subject to the Grade "A" Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (PMO) requirements or a State dairy regulatory

requirement equivalent to the current applicable PMO. Additionally EPA has requested comment on alternative approaches to

address facilities that may have milk containers and associated piping and appurtenances. This proposal addresses concerns

raised specifically by the dairy farm sector on the applicability of the SPCC requirements to milk containers.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 112 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/15/2009 74 FR 2461 

NPRM Comment Period End 02/17/2009 

Final Action 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WATER/2009/January/Day15/w830.pdf; Split from RIN 2050-AG16. Split from RIN 2050-AC62; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0584.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

74
Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oilspill/spcc.htm

Agency Contact: Gregory Wilson Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-7989 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: wilson.gregory@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Vanessa Principe Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-7913 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: principe.vanessa@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG52

 View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections and Clarifications Rule

Abstract: On March 18, 2010, EPA published a Direct Final Rule (Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections and Clarifications

Rule) that promulgated a number of amendments to the hazardous waste regulations for hazardous waste identification,

manifesting, the generator requirements, as well as changes to the hazardous waste permit and interim status standards. These

changes corrected existing errors in the hazardous waste regulations that have occurred over time as a result of typographical

errors or incorrect citations to paragraphs and other references. On June 16, 2010, all of the amendments to the Direct Final

Rule went into effect, except for six amendments which were withdrawn (June 4, 2010) because adverse comments were

received. The planned final rule will address the six withdrawn amendments by responding to the adverse comments received

and finalizing the appropriate changes.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 262; 40 CFR 266 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905 to 6906; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6921 to 6927; 42 USC 6930; 42 USC 6933 to 6939; 42

USC 6974

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 03/18/2010 75 FR 12989 

NPRM 03/18/2010 75 FR 13066 

NPRM Comment Period End 05/03/2010 

Partial Withdrawal Notice 06/04/2010 75 FR 31716 

Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ac0398; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ--

RCRA-2008-0678

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Jim OLeary Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

75
Phone: 703 308-8827 

FAX: 703 308-0514

E-Mail: OLeary.Jim@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG55

 View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste; Removing Saccharin and Its

Salts From the Lists of Hazardous Constituents, Hazardous Wastes, and Hazardous Substances

Abstract: In response to a petition submitted by the Calorie Control Council (CCC), EPA proposed to remove saccharin and

its salts from the lists of hazardous constituents (40 CFR section 261, Appendix VIII), the list of unused commercial chemical

products identified as hazardous wastes (40 CFR section 261.33(f)), and the list of hazardous substances (40 CFR section

302.4). The current weight of scientific evidence supports the petitioner's request. EPA originally listed saccharin and its salts

based on a scientific consensus that saccharin was a potential human carcinogen. However, the recent evaluation of available

data for saccharin and its salts by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) and the International Agency for Research on

Cancer (IARC) has concluded that scientific evidence does not support that saccharin and its salts are potential human

carcinogens. In addition, the Agency does not believe saccharin and its salts meet any other criteria for remaining on the above

specified lists.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 302 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905, 6912(a), 6921, 6922, 6924, 6938 ( RCRA sec 3001); 42 USC 9602 (CERCLA sec 102); 42

USC 9603 (CERCLA sec 103); 42 USC 9604; 33 USC 1321 and 1361

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/22/2010 75 FR 20942 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480add02d; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQRCRA-2009-0310

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Narendra Chaudhari Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-0454 

FAX: 703 308-0514

E-Mail: Chaudhari.Narendra@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robert Kayser Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-7304 

FAX: 703 308-0514

E-Mail: Kayser.Robert@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AC71

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

76
 View Related Documents

Title: RCRA Subtitle C Financial Test Criteria Regulatory Determination

Abstract: The RCRA Subtitle C financial test is one of several mechanisms available to the regulated community for

demonstrating financial assurance for closure/post-closure of their facilities. EPA decided at the end of the second quarter of FY

2007 to analyze whether regulatory changes are needed to ensure the test's continued and effective use. Test criteria have not

been updated since they were initially promulgated in 1982. Concerns have been raised that the criteria are outdated and no

longer adequately predict a company's continued solvency, such that some States are not allowing companies to use the test,

reducing the number of mechanisms that are available. Additionally, some language in the financial test reporting requirements

is no longer consistent with current professional standards under Generally Acceptable Accounting Principles. Addressing this

inconsistency would facilitate implementation by regulators.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 761 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6925; 42 USC 6926

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM on Determination 00/00/0000 

NPRM Original 07/01/1991 56 FR 30201 

NPRM 10/12/1994 59 FR 51523 

Additional Information: SAN No. 2647.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325188; 325199; 33299; 333999; 325998; 336399; 331311; 4411; 323110; 334; 22111; 332813; 325193;

221112; 45431; 4471; 811111; 32512; 325131; 33271; 56292; 333319; 32551; 32511; 42271; 32411; 325211; 323114; 22132;

48422; 311942; 336; 56211; 56221

Agency Contact: Tricia Buzzell Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5303P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8622 

FAX: 703 308-8609

E-Mail: buzzell.tricia@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE23

 View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to the Comprehensive Guideline for Procurement of Products Containing Recovered Materials

Abstract: EPA is required to prepare procurement guidelines that designate items that are or can be made with recovered

materials and to issue recommendations for government procurement of these items. Once designated, procuring agencies are

required to purchase these items with the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable. Government procurement of

EPA-designated items containing recovered materials fosters markets for recovered materials and, thereby, closes the recycling

loop. To date, EPA has designated 61 items under five Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines (CPGs). EPA has also issued a

Recovered Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN) with each CPG that provides recommendations on buying the designated items.

EPA also reviews existing CPG product designations for effectiveness, obsolescence, and consistency with the biobased

products designation program, environmentally preferable purchasing program, and Energy Star and energy efficient products

program. A CPG for Nylon Carpet was originally proposed in 2001. A Notice of Data Availability was issued asking for additional

information. EPA is evaluating the comments and considering how to proceed with the CPG for Nylon Carpet.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

77
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 247 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final CPG for Nylon Carpet 00/00/0000 

NPRM-CPG1 04/20/1994 59 FR 18892 

Final CPG1 05/01/1995 60 FR 21370 

NPRM CPG2 11/07/1996 61 FR 57748 

Final CPG2 11/13/1997 62 FR 60962 

NPRM-CPG3 08/26/1998 63 FR 45558 

Final-CPG3-RMAN3 01/19/2000 65 FR 3069 

NPRM CPG4 08/28/2001 66 FR 45256 

NODA on Nylon Carpet 07/16/2003 68 FR 42040 

NPRM-CPG5 12/10/2003 68 FR 68813 

Final-CPG4-RMAN4 04/30/2004 69 FR 24028 

Final CPG 5 09/14/2007 72 FR 52475 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NODA on Nylon Carpet - http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgibin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2003_register&docid=fr16jy03-84.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-0013; EPA-HQRCRA-2001-0047

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/cpg

Sectors Affected: 92111; 92119

Agency Contact: Marlene Regelski-Reddoor Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5306P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-7276 

FAX: 703 308-8686

E-Mail: regelski-reddoor.marlene@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Elizabeth Resek Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5306P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 347-0391 

FAX: 703 308-8686

E-Mail: resek.elizabeth@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE34

 View Related Documents

Title: Management of Cement Kiln Dust (CKD)

Abstract: In December 1993, EPA submitted a Report to Congress with its findings on the nature and management practices

associated with cement kiln dust (CKD). In 1995, EPA determined that control of CKD under subtitle C of RCRA was warranted

and published a regulatory determination (60 FR 7366). On August 20, 1999, EPA issued a proposed rule (64 FR 45632)

outlining the Agency's preferred regulatory approach (i.e., an exemption from hazardous waste listing for properly managed

CKD) and several optional approaches including requirements solely under RCRA subtitle D. On July 25, 2002, the Agency

published a notice (67 FR 48648) to announce the availability for public inspection and comment of recently acquired data on

CKD. The Agency continues to consider the comments received on the proposal and notice.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 256; 40 CFR 259; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 264 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

78
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a) RCRA 2002(a); 42 USC 6921(a) RCRA 3001(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

Regulatory Determination 02/07/1995 60 FR 7366 

NPRM 08/20/1999 64 FR 45632 

Notice - Extend Comment Period 10/28/1999 64 FR 58022 

NoDA 1 07/25/2002 67 FR 48648 

Notice -Extend Comment Period 11/08/2002 67 FR 68130 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NoDA 1 - http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?

dbname=2002_register&docid=fr25jy02-57.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-1999-0011

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32731

Agency Contact: Jana Englander Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8711 

FAX: 703 605-0595

E-Mail: Englander.Jana@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Souders Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8431 

FAX: 703 605-0595

E-Mail: Souders.Steve@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE51

 View Related Documents

Title: Modifications to RCRA Rules Associated With Solvent-Contaminated Industrial Wipes

Abstract: In 2003, EPA proposed to modify the RCRA hazardous waste regulations for management of solvent-contaminated

industrial wipes. EPA proposed to conditionally exclude wipes that are disposed of from the definition of hazardous waste and

to conditionally exclude laundered wipes from the definition of solid waste. Based on comments received on the proposal, EPA

revised its risk analysis used to evaluate the risks to human health and the environment if solvent-contaminated wipes or

laundry sludge are disposed of in a municipal solid waste landfill. A Notice of Data Availability was published in the Federal

Register to allow the public the opportunity to comment on the revised risk analysis. A determination will be made on finalizing

the rule after any required revisions to the risk analysis are completed and completion of an environmental justice analysis. If

finalized, this regulation will impact the management of two types of solvent-contaminated wipes: (1) wipes disposed of in land

disposal units or by combustion after use, and (2) wipes that are laundered after use to remove the solvent and then are used

again.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6921

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/20/2003 68 FR 65586 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

79
Notice of Data Availability 10/27/2009 74 FR 55163 

Extension of Comment Period 12/15/2009 74 FR 66259 

Final Action 07/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064800e10e1; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQRCRA-2003-0004

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 323; 325; 332; 333; 334; 336; 337; 441; 811; 812

Agency Contact: Teena Wooten Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8751 

FAX: 703 308-0514

E-Mail: wooten.teena@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE81

 View Related Documents

Title: Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Residuals Generated by Commercial Electric Power Producers

Abstract: This action is for the development of regulations for coal combustion residuals (formerly coal combustion waste).

The regulations will apply to the management of coal combustion residuals that are generated by steam electric power

generators, i.e., electric utilities and independent power producers and are disposed of in landfills and surface impoundments.

The intended benefits of this action will be to prevent contamination or damage to ground waters and surface waters, thereby

avoiding risk to human health and the environment, including ecological risks. The Agency issued on August 29, 2007, a Notice

of Data Availability announcing the availability for public inspection and comment new information and data on the management

of coal combustion residuals. The Agency considered these comments in developing the proposed rule regarding the regulation

of coal combustion residuals under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The Agency issued a proposed rule

on June 21, 2010, in which the Agency co-proposed two approaches- one which would regulate coal combustion residuals

under subtitle C of RCRA as a "special waste" and one under subtitle D of RCRA as a non-hazardous waste. Under both

approaches, coal combustion residuals that are beneficially used would remain Bevill exempt.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: State, Local, Or Tribal

Governments; Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 257; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 271; 40 CFR 302 (To search for

a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6906; 42 USC 6907(a)(3); 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6912(a)(1); 42

USC 6921; 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6925; 42 USC 6925(j); 42 USC 6935; 42 USC 6936; 42 USC

6937; 42 USC 6944(a); 42 USC 6949a(c); 33 USC 1345(d); 33 USC 1345(e)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NODA 08/29/2007 72 FR 49714 

NPRM 06/21/2010 75 FR 35128 

Notice - Public Hearings 07/15/2010 75 FR 41121 

Notice - Correction and Additional Public Hearings 08/20/2010 75 FR 51434 

NODA 10/21/2010 75 FR 64974 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NODA - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WASTE/2007/August/DayRegulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

80
29/f17138.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2009-0640

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State;

Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: Yes

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/fossil/ccrrule/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 221112

Agency Contact: Alexander Livnat Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-7251 

FAX: 703 605-0595

E-Mail: Livnat.Alexander@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Souders Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8431 

FAX: 703 605-0595

E-Mail: Souders.Steve@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE87

 View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; Subpart J Product Schedule

Listing Requirements

Abstract: EPA is considering proposing revisions to subpart J of the National Contingency Plan (NCP). The Clean Water Act

requires EPA to prepare a schedule of dispersants, other chemicals, and other spill mitigating devices and substances, if any,

that may be used in carrying out the NCP. Under subpart J, respondents wishing to add a product to the Product Schedule must

submit technical product data to EPA. The Agency is considering revisions to subpart J to clarify and/or change protocols for

adding a product to the Product Schedule, effectiveness and toxicity testing. These changes, if finalized, will help ensure

protection of the environment when these products are used to clean up and mitigate oil spills (1) into or upon navigable waters,

adjoining shorelines, the waters of the contiguous zone, or (2) which may affect natural resources belonging to or under the

exclusive management authority of the United States. Further, the Agency is considering proposed changes to 40 CFR 110.4

regarding the use of dispersants.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300; 40 CFR 110 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321(d)(2); 33 USC 1321(b)(3); CWA 311(d)(2)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4526

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oilspill

Sectors Affected: 3251; 325; 3259; 54

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

81
Agency Contact: William Nichols Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1970 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: nichols.nick@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Leigh DeHaven Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1974 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: dehaven.leigh@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AF01

 View Related Documents

Title: RCRA Smarter Waste Reporting

Abstract: By implementing the Smarter Waste Reporting initiative, EPA hopes to decrease the regulatory burden on

respondents completing the Biennial Report (BR) by eliminating the form for waste shipped offsite. [Note: This rule will not be

proposed until EPA receives additional legislative authority regarding the e-Manifest system, and the system is developed and

operational.] We plan to do this by proposing to: (1) substitute the BR data with the more-timely data from the eManifest system

and (2) improve the information we currently receive from respondents who manage their waste onsite, in an effort to improve

the quality of BR data.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 262.41 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6922(a)(6)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4735.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 2111; 2122; 2211; 3221; 323; 325; 326; 331; 332; 482; 483; 484; 5621; 5622

Agency Contact: Peggy Vyas Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5302P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-5477 

FAX: 703 308-8433

E-Mail: vyas.peggy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Dwane Young Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5302P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8433 

FAX: 703 308-8433

E-Mail: young.dwane@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

82
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AF03

 View Related Documents

Title: Correction of Errors and Adjustment of CERCLA Reportable Quantities

Abstract: EPA is considering a proposal for corrections and other adjustments to 40 CFR 302.4, the Designation of

Hazardous Substances. The proposal may include the correction of entries for individual substances, entries for F-and K- waste

streams and entries in appendix A of 40 CFR 302.4. Other aspects of the proposal may include additional substances as entries

in table 302.4, appendix A to section 302.4, and the table in section 302.6(b)(iii); removal of other entries from these lists; and

amendments to certain footnotes that explain entries in table 302.4.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 302 (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 9602 to 9603

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4737

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1965 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: beasley.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG20

 View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Waste Manifest Revisions—Standards and Procedures for Electronic Manifests

Abstract: This action is aimed at finalizing the development of EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

regulatory standards and procedures that will govern the initiation, signing, transmittal, and retention of hazardous waste

manifests using electronic documents and systems. There are a total of 5.1 million manifests processed each year, including

state-defined hazardous waste paper manifests. EPA proposed electronic manifest standards in May 2001 as part of a more

general manifest revision action that also addressed standardizing the paper manifest form's data elements and procedures

(EPA Form 8700-22). The manifest form revisions were decoupled from action on the electronic manifest, and the Final Form

Revisions Rule was published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2005. The May 2001 electronic manifest proposed rule was a

standards-based decentralized approach under which EPA would establish and maintain the standards that would guide the

development of electronic manifest systems by private sector entities that chose to participate in the system. However, since

publication of the May 2001 proposed rule, EPA found that there is a broad consensus in favor of a single national "eManifest"

system sponsored by EPA, rather than assorted de-centralized commercial systems. Subsequently, in May 2004, EPA

conducted a manifest stakeholder meeting to collect additional stakeholder views on the future direction of eManifest. Based on

public comment on the 2001 proposed electronic standards and stakeholder feedback at the May 2004 meeting, EPA published

a Notice of Data Availability (NODA) on 18 April 2006 announcing EPA's preferred approach to develop a centralized webbased eManifest system to be hosted on EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) computer hub. However, EPA's ability to publish

this final rule will depend on the passing of legislation that would provide EPA with authority to collect and retain user charges

for the payment of the development and operation costs related to the eManifest system.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

83
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 262; 40 CFR 263; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 271 (To search for a specific

CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6926; PL 105-277

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM Original 05/22/2001 66 FR 28240 

Notice of Public Meeting 04/01/2004 69 FR 17145 

NODA 04/18/2006 71 FR 19842 

NODA #2 02/26/2008 73 FR 10204 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM Original - http://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgibin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=yLwpRg/13/2/0&WAISaction=retrieve; Split from RIN 2050-AE21; EPA Docket information: EPAHQ-RCRA-2001-0032

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/gener/manifest/

Sectors Affected: 325; 2211; 332; 2122; 2111; 326; 331; 323; 3221; 482; 484; 5621; 5622; 483

Agency Contact: Rich LaShier Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8796 

FAX: 703 308-0514

E-Mail: LaShier.Rich@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Bryan Groce Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8750 

FAX: 703 308-0514

E-Mail: Groce.Bryan@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG22

 View Related Documents

Title: National Contingency Plan Revisions To Align With the National Response Plan

Abstract: The purpose of this regulation is to revise the National Contingency Plan (NCP) to align it with the National

Response Framework (NRF). The purpose of the NCP is to provide the organizational structure and procedures for preparing for

and responding to discharges of oil and releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants (see 40 CFR 300.1).

The purpose of the NRF is to provide a guide that describes how the nation conducts all-hazard response to domestic

incidents. The NRF was developed by the Department of Homeland Security, in consultation with federal (including EPA), State,

Tribal, local governments, first responder organizations, private sector preparedness and relief groups. Alignment of the NCP

with the NRF will facilitate smooth integration of emergency response activities under the NCP with the NRF when both plans

are activated for an incident. The NRF does not alter the existing authorities of Federal departments and agencies, but rather,

establishes the coordinating framework to integrate the authorities of various agencies into an all-hazard approach to incident

management. EPA is making another minor revision to the NCP. The descriptions of Federal agency capabilities are being

updated and modifications are being made, where appropriate, to reflect the Department of Homeland Security organization.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

84
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4971

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1965 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: beasley.lynn@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Jean Schumann Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1977 

FAX: 202 564-2620

E-Mail: schumann.jean@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG34

 View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Land Disposal Restrictions Treatment Standards and Amendments to Recycling Requirements for Spent

Petroleum Refining Hydrotreating and Hydrorefining Catalysts

Abstract: In response to a rulemaking petition, the Environmental Protection Agency is considering amending the Land

Disposal Restriction (LDR) treatment requirements for EPA Waste Codes K172 and F037. EPA is also responding to other

elements of the rulemaking petition in this notice. Finally, in response to separate comments received from petroleum industry

representatives, EPA is considering proposing a rule to help encourage consistent levels of recycling of spent hydrotreating and

hydrorefining catalysts, in a manner that protects human health and the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 271 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )

Legal Authority: 42 USC 1006; 42 USC 2002(a); 42 USC 3001-3009; 42 USC 3014; 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6906; 42 CFR

6912; 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6924-6927; 42 USC 6934; 42 USC 6937; 42 USC 6938

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Notice of Data Availability 10/20/2003 68 FR 59935 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice of Data Availability - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAWASTE/2003/November/Day-24/f29319.htm; EPA Docket information: Legacy Docket No. RCRA-2003-0023 for 10/20/03

NODA

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

85
Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32411; 562211

Agency Contact: Ross Elliott Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8748 

FAX: 703 605-0594

E-Mail: Elliott.Ross@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG39

 View Related Documents

Title: Amendment to the Universal Waste Rule: Addition of Pharmaceuticals

Abstract: On December 2, 2008, EPA proposed to add hazardous pharmaceutical wastes to the federal universal waste

program. The universal waste regulations streamline the collection requirements for specified hazardous wastes over current

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste requirements. Even if included under the universal waste

program, pharmaceutical universal wastes will still need to be sent to destination facilities that must comply with the applicable

requirements for treatment, storage and disposal facilities under the full hazardous waste regulations. Finally, because this rule

is less stringent than current RCRA hazardous waste regulations, authorized states are not required to modify their programs to

adopt this regulation, if finalized.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term

Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 270; 40 CFR 273 (To search for

a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6926; 42 USC

6927; 42 USC 6930; 42 USC 6937

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 12/02/2008 73 FR 73520 

Extension of Comment Period 01/30/2009 74 FR 5633 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-28161.htm; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2007-0932

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State;

Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/wastes/hazard/wastetypes/universal/pharm.htm

Agency Contact: Lisa Lauer Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-7418 

FAX: 703 308-0514

E-Mail: Lauer.Lisa@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG40

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

86
 View Related Documents

Title: Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act: Amendments and Streamlining Rule

Abstract: This supplemental proposal will address reporting thresholds for rock salt, sand, gravel, and other chemicals that

pose minimal risk. The proposed rule was published on June 8, 1998 (63 FR 31268). This supplemental rule, when finalized, will

minimize burden for those facilities that are currently reporting chemicals that pose minimal risk under sections 311 and 312 of

the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act. This rule, when finalized, may also reduce the number of facilities

subject to these reporting requirements. The reporting requirements under sections 311 and 312 are intended to enhance

communities' and emergency response officials' awareness of chemical hazards; to facilitate the development of State and local

emergency response plans; and to aid communities and emergency response officials in preparing for and responding to

emergencies safely and effectively. By proposing to provide relief from routine reporting of substances with minimal hazards and

minimal risk, State and local officials can focus on chemicals that may pose more significant hazard or may present greater risks

to the community.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 370 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 11002; 42 USC 11004; 42 USC 11048; 42 USC 11021; 42 USC 11022

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Supplemental NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2050-AE17.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8019 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: Jacob.Sicy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG45

 View Related Documents

Title: Standards for the Safe and Environmentally Protective Placement of Coal Combustion Residuals as Minefill in Coal

Mines Not Regulated Under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act

Abstract: This action is part of a joint rulemaking effort with the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) of the Department of Interior

(DOI) using a combination of regulatory authorities available under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA)

and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Specifically, EPA is considering performance standards for the

environmentally protective placement of coal combustion residuals (CCRs) for filling surface or underground coal mines,

referred to as minefilling, not regulated under SMCRA. CCRs are byproducts of the combustion of coal at electric utility and

independent power producing facilities. This action results from EPA's Regulatory Determination for fossil fuel combustion

wastes (65 FR 32214 May 22, 2000), in which the Agency concluded that national regulations under RCRA (and/or

modifications to the existing regulations established under SMCRA) are warranted when these wastes are placed in surface and

underground mines. As described in the Regulatory Determination, there is sufficient evidence that adequate controls may not

be in place, and that regulations are warranted. This action is also a result of a recommendation by the National Research

Council (NRC, Managing Coal Combustion Residues in Coal Mines, 2006) regarding the management of CCRs in coal mines.

NRC recommended that OSM and/or EPA promulgate enforceable federal regulations governing the minefilling of CCRs. In

response to the NRC study, OSM published on Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Placement of CCRs in Active and

Abandoned Coal Mines (72 FR 12026, March 14, 2007), which took comment on the appropriateness of modifying SMCRA

regulations to address minefilling at mines with SMCRA permits. This action will be coordinated with the OSM proposed rule.

The intended benefits of this action will be to prevent contamination or damage to ground waters and surface waters, thereby

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

87
avoiding risk to human health and the environment, including ecological risks.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term

Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5274

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal;

Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions;

Organizations Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/fossil/index.htm

Agency Contact: Bonnie Robinson Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8429 

FAX: 703 308-8686

E-Mail: Robinson.Bonnie@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG51

 View Related Documents

Title: Episodic Generation Rulemaking

Abstract: EPA is considering the development of a specific regulation associated with facilities that, as a result of certain

events, find themselves moving occasionally or "episodically" into a higher hazardous waste generator status. Examples of

events that may temporarily affect a facility's generator regulatory status include: construction and demolition debris; equipment

maintenance during a plant shut down; removal of post-shelf life inventory; tank cleanouts; and process upsets.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 262 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6922 (a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 31-33

Agency Contact: Jim OLeary Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

88
Phone: 703 308-8827 

FAX: 703 308-0514

E-Mail: OLeary.Jim@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Charlotte Mooney Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5403P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-7025 

FAX: 703 308-0514

E-Mail: mooney.charlotte@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE95

 View Related Documents

Title: Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act; Availability of

Information to the Public; Technical Amendment

Abstract: Section 112(r)(7) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 68 require certain

stationary sources to report an Off-site Consequence Analysis (OCA), including a worst-case release scenario, in a Risk

Management Plan (RMP) that is to be made available to the public. In response to concerns that posting OCA information on

the Internet might increase the risk of terrorist and other criminal activities, on August 5, 1999, the Chemical Safety Information,

Site Security and Fuels Regulatory Relief Act (CSISSFRRA) was enacted. The Act requires the President to promulgate

regulations governing the distribution of the OCA sections of RMPs that, in the opinion of the President, would minimize the

likelihood of accidental releases and the risk of terrorist and other criminal activities associated with posting this information. The

President delegated his rulemaking authority to the Attorney General and the Administrator of EPA, who jointly promulgated the

required regulations at 40 CFR part 1400 in August 2000. Since the part 1400 regulations restrict the public's access to the OCA

sections of RMPs in certain ways, the Agency has decided to withdraw an effort to revise 40 CFR part 68 to reflect the August

2000 rulemaking.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68.210 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412(r)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 08/27/2010 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8019 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: Jacob.Sicy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG54

 View Related Documents

Title: Identifying the Universe of Government Research in Laboratories and Determining Student Involvement in Generating

Laboratory Hazardous Waste

Abstract: The Academic Laboratory Rulemaking was published on December 1, 2008. At the time of the rulemaking, the

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

89
Agency did not have sufficient information about student populations in government research laboratories to include government

research laboratories in the applicability of the final Laboratories Rule. Therefore, the Agency had planned to publish a Notice of

Data Availability making available the data we have on government research laboratories and solicit comment on whether it is

accurate, as well as solicit comment on the number of students in government research laboratories. Thus far, approximately a

dozen states have adopted the Academic Laboratories Rule, with many more states still in the process of adopting it. The

Agency believes better information on whether to pursue a NODA would be available once implementation of the new rule has

been in effect for a period of time. Therefore, the Agency is withdrawing this effort until such time as a better determination may

be made.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 262 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6922

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 09/10/2010 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2050-AG18. No legal deadline; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-

0012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Patricia Mercer Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8408 

FAX: 703 308-0522

E-Mail: mercer.patricia@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Jessica Biegelson Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5304P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8286 

FAX: 703 308-0026

E-Mail: biegelson.jessica@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG57

 View Related Documents

Title: Withdrawal of Expansion of RCRA Comparable Fuels Exclusion

Abstract: EPA promulgated the withdrawal of the ECF (emission comparable fuel) exclusion on June 15, 2010. These are

fuels produced from hazardous secondary materials which, when burned in industrial boilers under specified conditions,

generate emissions that are comparable to emissions from burning fuel oil in those boilers. EPA withdrew the ECF conditional

exclusion because ECF appears to be better regarded as being a discarded material and regulated as a hazardous waste. The

exclusions for comparable fuel and synthesis gas fuel are not addressed or otherwise affected by this rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking:

Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.38 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6924

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

90
Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/08/2009 74 FR 64643 

NPRM Comment Period End 01/22/2010 

Final Action 06/15/2010 75 FR 33712 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b01cf7; Split from RIN 2050-AG24.; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2005-0017

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/combust/compfuels/exclusion.htm

Sectors Affected: 3251; 5614; 3273; 9281; 3259; 3255; 3241; 3254; 3252; 4884; 5622

Agency Contact: Mary Jackson Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5302P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8453 

FAX: 703 308-8433

E-Mail: jackson.mary@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Bob Holloway Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5302P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8461 

FAX: 703 308-8433

E-Mail: holloway.bob@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG58

 View Related Documents

Title: Revise: Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts for Superfund Response Actions

Abstract: 40 CFR part 35 subpart O prescribes requirements for administering cooperative agreements awarded to states,

Native American tribes, and political subdivisions to conduct remedial actions, non-time-critical removal actions, pre-remedial

activities, and other response activities authorized by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability

Act (CERCLA) section 104(a)-(j). In addition, subpart O prescribes requirements for the Superfund State Contract that is

necessary whenever EPA or a political subdivision is the lead agency for a CERCLA remedial action. Subpart O rules were

originally promulgated on June 5, 1990 and revised May 2, 2007. The Agency revised the May 2, 2007 rule to further reduce the

recipients' burden by allowing quarterly and semiannual progress reports to be due in 60 days, instead of 30 days. Also, under

a Superfund State Contract, the recipient may request the EPA for any overpayment of cost share from one site be applied to

meet the cost share requirement of another site. These revisions will improve the administration and effectiveness of Superfund

Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 35 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 08/13/2010 75 FR 49414 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5376; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2010-0085.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

91
Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/superfund

Agency Contact: Angelo Carasea Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5204P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 603-8828 

FAX: 703 603-9104

E-Mail: Carasea.Angelo@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Doug Ammon Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5204P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 347-8925 

FAX: 703 603-9104

E-Mail: ammon.doug@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG59

 View Related Documents

Title: SPCC Compliance Date Extension

Abstract: On November 13, 2009, EPA amended the Spill Prevention Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) rule. The

amendments completed the SPCC action proposed on October 15, 2007 (72 FR 58378), finalized on December 5, 2008 (73 FR

74236), and for which the Agency considered public comments again in February 2009 (74 FR 5900, February 3, 2009).

However, EPA recognizes that because of the changes in this action, and specifically provisions that have been removed from

the December 2008 Amendments, facilities may need additional time to comply with the SPCC amendments. Because of the

uncertainty surrounding the final amendments to the December 5, 2008 rule and the delay of the effective date.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 112 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/03/2010 75 FR 45572 

NPRM Comment Period End 09/02/2010 

Final Action 10/14/2010 75 FR 63093 

Additional Information: Final - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?

R=0900006480bb6eeae; Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPA-2009-0080

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Vanessa Principe Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-7913 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: principe.vanessa@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Mark Howard Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

92
5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1964 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: howard.markw@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG63

 View Related Documents

Title: Temporary Suspension of Certain Oil Spill Response Time Requirements to Support Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill of

National Significance (SONS) Response

Abstract: This emergency temporary final rule suspends certain oil spill response time requirements and notification

requirements for certain facilities and vessels. This rule provides oil spill removal organizations (OSROs), and facilities and

vessels with their own response resources, with the ability to relocate response resources from current locations to the Gulf of

Mexico to aid in the response to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. This action facilitates the participation of OSROs, facilities and

vessels located outside of the Gulf region. This temporary final rule is effective until December 31, 2010.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 112 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321(j)(1)(c), (j)(5) and (j)(6); EO 12777, 56 FR 54757

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Emergency Temporary Interim Rule 06/30/2010 75 FR 37712 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Emergency Temporary Interim Rulehttp://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b0ea35; Related Agency: Department of

Homeland Security, US Coast Guard, RIN 1625-AB49; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPA-2010-0559

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oilspill/

Agency Contact: James Bove Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

2366A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-9887 

FAX: 202 564-5644

E-Mail: Bove.James@epa.gov

Agency Contact: J-Troy Swackhammer Environmental Protection Agency

Solid Waste and Emergency Response

5104A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1966 

FAX: 202 564-2625

E-Mail: Swackhammer.J-Troy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO60

 View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review Under CAA Section 111(b)(1)(B)

Abstract: The goal of EPA’s New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review under CAA section 111(b)(1)(B) is to

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

93
address our obligation to review and revise each NSPS at a minimum of every eight years. The review will outline criteria that

the Agency believes indicates that a standard remains effective and need not be reviewed. The strategy also seeks to minimize

the administrative burden of the NSPS program by initially addressing those NSPS that remain effective based on “readily

available information” and do not need to be revised.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411; 42 USC 7429

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5168

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Tina Ndoh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D205-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2750 

FAX: 919 541-5600

E-Mail: Ndoh.Christina@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D205-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5060 

FAX: 919 541-5600

E-Mail: conner.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AH90

 View Related Documents

Title: Technical Change to Dose Methodology

Abstract: The purpose of this action is to make a technical change to the dose methodology used in subpart A of 40 CFR

191, entitled Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, HighLevel Waste and Transuranic Waste. The current methodology is outdated. The dose methodology used in the rule published on

September 19, 1985, was based on the target organ approach recommended by the International Commission on Radiological

Protection (ICRP) in Report #2. Since that time science has progressed and a new methodology based on an effective dose

equivalent approach is currently being recommended by the ICRP in Report #26. This action would propose updating the 40

CFR 191, subpart A dose limits published in 1985 from the target organ to the state-of-the-art effective dose equivalent system.

There would be no change in the level of protection, just the scientific methodology for determining compliance with the levels of

protection established in 1985.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 190(B); 40 CFR 191(A) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 2021 Atomic Energy Act of 1954; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1970; Nuclear Waste Policy Act of

1982

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

94
Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 08/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4003

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Brian Littleton Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6608J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9216 

FAX: 202 343-2065

E-Mail: Littleton.Brian@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ray Clark Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6608J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9198 

FAX: 202 343-2065

E-Mail: clark.ray@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AI43

 View Related Documents

Title: Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to review and, if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria for the primary

(health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. The last CO

NAAQS review occurred in 1994 with a decision by the Administrator not to revise the existing standards. The current review

which initiated in September 2007 includes the preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment, Risk/Exposure Assessment,

and a Policy Assessment Document by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee and

the public. These documents inform the Administrator's decision as to whether to retain or revise the standards.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial US District Court Northern District of CA San Francisco Division 5/5/08 10/28/2010 

Other Judicial US District Court Northern District of CA San Francisco Division 5/5/08 05/13/2011 

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As established in the Clean Air Act, the national ambient air quality standards for carbon monoxide are

to be reviewed every 5 years.

Legal Basis: Section 109 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409) directs the Administrator to propose and promulgate

"primary" and "secondary" national ambient air quality standards for pollutants identified under section 108 (the "criteria"

pollutants). The "primary" standards are established for the protection of public health, while "secondary" standards are to

protect against public welfare.

Alternatives: The main alternatives for the Administrator's decision on the review of the national ambient air quality

standards for CO are whether to retain or revise the existing standards.

Costs and Benefits: The Clean Air Act makes clear that the economic and technical feasibility of attaining standards are

not to be considered in setting or revising the NAAQS, although such factors may be considered in the development of State

plans to implement the standards. Accordingly, the Agency prepares cost and benefit information in order to provide States

information that may be useful in considering different implementation strategies for meeting proposed or final standards. Cost

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

95
and benefit information is not developed to support a NAAQS rulemaking until sufficient policy and scientific information is

available to narrow potential options for the form and level associated with any potential revisions to the standard. Therefore,

work on developing the plan for conducting the cost and benefit analysis will generally start 1 1/2 to 2 years following the start

of a NAAQS review.

Risks: During the course of this review, risk assessments will be conducted to evaluate health risks associated with retention

or revision of the CO standards.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Final Action 08/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/co/s_co_index.html

Agency Contact: Ines Pagan Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5469 

E-Mail: pagan.ines@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Deirdre Murphy Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-0729 

E-Mail: murphy.deirdre@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AI62

 View Related Documents

Title: National VOC Emission Standards for Consumer Products; Amendments

Abstract: This action consists of amendments to the consumer products part 59 VOC rule under Clean Air Act Section

183(e). The amendments are being undertaken to address Clean Air Act Advisory Committee recommendation AQM2.3, which

called for aligning the CP rule with the model rule adopted by the Ozone Transport Commission.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 59 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7511b

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2011 

Final Action 09/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4309

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

96
Sectors Affected: 32599

Agency Contact: Bruce Moore Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5460 

FAX: 919 541-0246

E-Mail: Moore.Bruce@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-5335 

E-Mail: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK03

 View Related Documents

Title: Performance-Based Measurement System For Fuels: Criteria For Self-Qualifying Alternative Test Methods; Description

of Optional Statistical Quality Control Measures

Abstract: Transportation fuels (like gasoline and diesel fuel) are regulated by EPA under the Clean Air Act to control the

emissions that result when they are burned in engines, and also to protect engines' emission control equipment. Fuels

regulations require measurement of various of the fuels' properties, and prescribe "designated" analytical methods for that

purpose. This regulation is intended to provide a way for regulated parties to self-qualify alternatives to the designated

measurement methods that may be cheaper, quicker, simpler, more amenable to automation, or otherwise preferable. The

regulation will also prescribe a minimum level of statistical quality control for all fuels test methods, designated or alternative.

The regulations should quicken the adoption of new measurement technologies by removing the need for multiple methodspecific rule-makings, but to do so in a way that will not degrade the performance of the overall measurement system.

Introduction of statistical quality control for all methods should improve measurement precision and accuracy in actual practice

across all methods.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7545

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2011 

Final Action 12/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4633

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 324199; 54199; 334516; 42271; 48691

Agency Contact: Joe Sopata Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6406J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9034 

FAX: 202 343-2801

E-Mail: Sopata.Joe@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

97
Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM09

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amendments to the Section 608 Leak Repair Regulations

Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing changes to the leak repair regulations promulgated under

section 608 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAA or Act). EPA is proposing to lower the leak repair trigger rates for

comfort cooling, commercial refrigeration, and industrial process refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment (i.e., appliances)

with ozone-depleting refrigerant charges greater than 50 pounds. This action proposes to streamline existing required practices

and associated reporting and recordkeeping requirements by establishing similar leak repair requirements for owners or

operators of comfort cooling, commercial refrigeration, and industrial process refrigeration appliances. This action also proposes

to reduce the use and emissions of ozone-depleting refrigerants by requiring the following: verification and documentation of all

repairs, retrofit or retirement of appliances that cannot be sufficiently repaired, mandatory replacement of appliance components

that have a history of failures, and mandatory recordkeeping of the determination of the full charge and the fate of recovered

refrigerant.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.150 to 82.169 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 05/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0167

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608

Agency Contact: Julius Banks Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9870 

FAX: 202 565-2155

E-Mail: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Cindy Newberg Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9729 

E-Mail: Newberg.Cindy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM84

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Defense Land Systems and Miscellaneous Equipment

Abstract: In this action the EPA is proposing emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (HAP) emissions from surface

coating operations performed on-site at installations owned or operated by the Armed Forces of the United States (including the

Coast Guard and the National Guard of any such state), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the National

Nuclear Security Administration. Additionally, this proposed regulation will consider potential control of HAP emissions from the

surface coating of military munitions manufactured by or for the Armed Forces of the United States (including the Coast Guard

and the National Guard of any such state). Aerospace and shipbuilding surface coating operations at these installations were

originally covered by the already-promulgated MACT standards for aerospace manufacturing and rework and shipbuilding and

ship repair. However, other recently-promulgated surface coating MACT standards were also expected to address other surface

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

98
coating operations at these installations (e.g., miscellaneous metal parts and products, plastic parts and products, etc.).

Following proposal of these standards EPA received comments indicating that a separate standard for defense operations is a

better approach. Accordingly, this proposed rulemaking is related to surface coating activities at installations which do not meet

the applicability criteria of either the Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework or Shipbuilding and Ship Repair MACT standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HA-OAR-2005-0527

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Kim Teal Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5580 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: Teal.Kim@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-5335 

E-Mail: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN00

 View Related Documents

Title: Implementing Periodic Monitoring in Federal and State Operating Permit Programs

Abstract: This rule would revise the existing Compliance Assurance Monitoring rule (40 CFR part 64) to be implemented

through the operating permits rules (40 CFR parts 70 and 71). The revised CAM rule would define when periodic monitoring

must be created for sources to use in determining compliance status relative to applicable requirements (e.g., emissions limits).

The revisions would specify criteria and procedures that source owners must address in creating effective periodic monitoring.

The revisions will build on the success of the 1997 rule by expanding applicability to include emissions units that do not use

add-on control devices but minimize pollutant emissions using other types of control measures. This federal rule will provide for

greater consistency in monitoring requirements than can be achieved through processes applied state-by-state and permit-bypermit. The result will also further satisfy the Clean Air Act requirement that EPA require enhanced monitoring sufficient to

assure compliance for all major sources.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70.6(c)(1); 40 CFR 71.6(c)(1); 40 CFR 64 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

99
Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4699.2; Split from RIN 2060-AK29.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Peter Westlin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1058 

FAX: 919 541-1039

E-Mail: Westlin.Peter@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Bob Schell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4116 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: Schell.Bob@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN17

 View Related Documents

Title: Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Small Municipal

Waste Combustors: Remand Response and Amendments

Abstract: This rule would amend the final (Dec. 2000) small municipal waste combustors (MWC) new source performance

standards (NSPS) and emission guidelines (EG). The small MWC rule regulates owners and operators of small MWC, which are

MWC units with capacities between 35 tons per day (tpd) and 250 tpd. This action will respond to the DC Circuit Court's remand

of the small MWC standards, including assessment of the MACT floors and all related analyses.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 subpart AAAA; 40 CFR 60 subpart BBBB (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA 111; CAA 129

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0514

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 92411; 562213

Agency Contact: Brian Shrager Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C439-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-7689 

E-Mail: shrager.brian@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Walt Stevenson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

100
D243-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5264 

FAX: 919 541-5450

E-Mail: stevenson.walt@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN33

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production, Amendments

Abstract: This action will amend the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Polyvinyl

Chloride and Copolymers. These standards were originally promulgated on July 10, 2002 (67 FR 45886) but were vacated by

the D.C. Circuit on June 18, 2004 in Mossville Environmental Action v. EPA, 370 F.3d 1232 (D.C.Cir. 2004).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 08/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0037

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325211

Agency Contact: Jodi Howard Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4607 

FAX: 919 541-0246

E-Mail: howard.jodi@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: KC Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN48

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amending Requirements To Import Ozone-Depleting Substances for Destruction in

the U.S.

Abstract: EPA is proposing to revise the requirements for import of Class I and Class II controlled ozone-depleting

substances (controlled substances) into the United States by streamlining provisions for importing controlled substances

specifically for purposes of destruction. The proposed provisions would no longer require used imports for destruction to abide

by the petition process but instead require a more efficient pre-notification process to EPA in the form of a certification of intent

to import for destruction for all imports for destruction--both used and virgin. The regulation would revise associated

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

101
recordkeeping and reporting requirements for persons who import controlled substances for destruction--replacing an existing

set of requirements with a new, more effective set of requirements. EPA is also proposing to revise the regulations governing

the destruction of controlled substances under 40 CFR part 82, subpart A, by revising the definitions governing destruction of

controlled substances and revising recordkeeping and reporting requirements for persons who destroy controlled substances.

While overall burden for respondents will increase, this is due to the additional participants that EPA expects will take advantage

of the new regulatory process by importing additional controlled substances for destruction. If there were no additional

respondents projected to participate in the import process, overall burden to respondents would decrease. EPA believes that the

streamlined regulatory provisions being proposed for importers would ease overall burden, encouraging more imports into the

United States for responsible destruction, and thus would result in the destruction of additional quantities of controlled

substances in the United States that would have otherwise been emitted into the atmosphere, where they deplete the

stratospheric ozone layer.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 06/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5017; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0130.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/ozone/destruction.html

Agency Contact: Staci Gatica Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9469 

E-Mail: Gatica.Staci@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Julius Banks Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9870 

FAX: 202 565-2155

E-Mail: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN99

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants—Amendments

Abstract: This action is a supplemental proposal for amendment of the national emission standards for hazardous air

pollutants (NESHAP) for mercury emissions from mercury cell chlor-alkali plants that was promulgated in 2003. The 2003

NESHAP limited mercury air emissions from existing plants and prohibited the use of mercury in new plants. Following

promulgation of the 2003 NESHAP, EPA received a petition to reconsider several aspects of the rule from the Natural

Resources Defense Council (NRDC). NRDC also filed a petition for judicial review of the rule in the U.S. Court of Appeals for

the D.C. Circuit. By a letter dated April 8, 2004, EPA granted NRDC’s petition for reconsideration, and on July 20, 2004, the

Court placed the petition for judicial review in abeyance pending EPA’s action on the reconsideration. In May 2008, EPA

proposed amendments in response to NRDC’s petition for reconsideration. The 2008 amendments proposed changes to the

regulation for cell room fugitive mercury emissions to require recordkeeping of work practice standards for cell rooms in all

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

102
facilities as well as to require instrumental monitoring of cell room fugitive mercury emissions for all plants. The 2008 proposed

rule also amended aspects of the 2003 NESHAP to correct errors and inconsistencies that had been brought to EPA's attention

since the NESHAP was promulgated. This supplemental proposal will cover technical corrections, revise start and shutdown

requirements, and include a proposed additional control option.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 06/11/2008 73 FR 33258 

Supplemental NPRM 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=090000648061e497; EPA Docket information: EPA–

HQ– OAR–2002–0017

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hgcellcl/hgcellclpg.html

Sectors Affected: 325181

Agency Contact: Donna Jones Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27709 

Phone: 919 541-5251 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: jones.donnalee@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2837 

FAX: 919 541-4991

E-Mail: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO03

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) Operations—

Amendment

Abstract: On December 15, 1995, the EPA issued national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) under

Section 112 of the Clean Air Act for shipbuilding and ship repair (surface coating) operations. The NESHAP sets Maximum

Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards for existing and new major sources of hazardous air pollutant emissions. This

action is intended to more clearly state the distinction between and the definition of ship and pleasure craft. It is being issued in

response to questions concerning whether yachts greater than 20 meters (78.7 feet) in length are ships and, therefore subject to

the shipbuilding NESHAP. This proposed action will ensure that all activities such as pleasure vessels (yachts) intended to be

subject to the NESHAP are in fact subject to it.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

103
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 12/29/2006 71 FR 78369 

NPRM 12/29/2006 71 FR 78392 

Withdrawal of Direct Final 02/27/2007 72 FR 8630 

Reproposal 12/00/2010 

Final Action 09/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0357

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 92811; 336611

Agency Contact: Kaye Whitfield Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2509 

FAX: 919 541-1039

E-Mail: whitfield.kaye@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-5335 

E-Mail: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO17

 View Related Documents

Title: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds—Exclusion of Family of Four Hydrofluoropolyethers (HFPEs) and

HFE-347pc-f

Abstract: The EPA lists for regulation certain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as precursors to ozone formation under

section 302(s) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and 40 CFR 51.100(s). While all VOCs have the ability to react in the atmosphere to

form ozone, some VOCs react at such a slow rate their contribution to ground-level ozone is negligible. Through regulation, the

Agency can exempt negligibly reactive compounds from the definition of VOCs. VOCs that are exempted from the CAA

definition are no longer necessary to control in state implementation plans for attaining the national ambient air quality standard

for ozone. In 2005 and 2007 the EPA received petitions to exclude a family of four HFPEs and also HFE-347pc-f from the list of

regulated VOCs on the basis that, as precursors, these compounds make a negligible contribution to the formation of ground

level ozone. These compounds have the potential for use as refrigerants because they are not stratospheric ozone depleters.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.100(s) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 301

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Final Action 12/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5131

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

104
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3251

Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3356 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: Sanders.Dave@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: William L Johnson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27525 

Phone: 919 541-5245 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: johnson.williaml@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO18

 View Related Documents

Title: Response to Request for Reconsideration of Final Air Emission MACT Rules for Large Municipal Waste Combustors

(MWCs).

Abstract: EPA originally adopted air emission standards for new and existing large municipal waste combustors (MWCs) in

1995. As required by section 129 of the Clean Air Act, EPA reviewed these standards and proposed revised standards. The

proposal occurred on Dec 19, 2005, and final standards were published on May 10, 2006 (71 FR 27323). A number of

individuals filed litigation on various aspects of the standards. Moreover, the Agency received a separate petition to reopen the

section 129(a)(2) standards. EPA agreed to initiate such an action. Accordingly, EPA petitioned the court to remand the 2006

LMWC rule to EPA. The court issued the remand in February 2008.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 129

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

Notice of Reconsideration of Final Rule 03/20/2007 72 FR 13016 

NPRM 06/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice of reconsideration of final rule -

http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2007/March/Day-20/a5022.htm

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 92411; 562213

Agency Contact: Walt Stevenson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5264 

FAX: 919 541-5450

E-Mail: stevenson.walt@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

105
Agency Contact: Brian Shrager Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C439-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-7689 

E-Mail: shrager.brian@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO47

 View Related Documents

Title: Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to review and, if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria for the primary

(health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On October 17,

2006, EPA published a final rule to revise the primary and secondary NAAQS for particulate matter to provide increased

protection of public health and welfare. With regard to the primary standard for fine particles (generally referring to particles less

than or equal to 2.5 micrometers in diameter, PM2.5), EPA revised the level of the 24-hour PM2.5 standard to 35 micrograms

per cubic meter (ug/m3) and retained the level of the annual PM2.5 standard at 15 ug/m3. With regard to primary standards for

particles generally less than or equal to 10 micrometers in diameter (PM10), EPA retained the 24-hour PM10 standard and

revoked the annual PM10 standard. With regard to secondary PM standards, EPA made them identical in all respects to the

primary PM standards, as revised. EPA initiated the current review in 2007 with a workshop to discuss key policy-relevant

issues around which EPA would structure the review. This review includes the preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment

(ISA), Risk/Exposure Assessment (REA), and a Policy Assessment (PA) by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean

Air Scientific Advisory Committee and the public. These documents inform the Administrator's decision as to whether to retain or

revise the standards. The ISA was completed in December 2009, the final REAs for health risk assessment and visibility

assessment were finalized in June and July 2010, respectively. The first draft PA was reviewed by CASAC on April 8-9, 2010.

The second draft Policy Assessment was reviewed by CASAC on July 26-27, 2010.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As established in the Clean Air Act, the national ambient air quality standards for particulate matter

are to be reviewed every 5 years.

Legal Basis: Section 109 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409) directs the Administrator to propose and promulgate

"primary" and "secondary" national ambient air quality standards for pollutants identified under section 108 (the "criteria"

pollutants). The "primary" standards are established for the protection of public health, while "secondary" standards are to

protect against public welfare.

Alternatives: The main alternatives for the Administrator's decision on the review of the national ambient air quality

standards for particulate matter are whether to retain or revise the existing standards and, if revisions are necessary, the

indicators, averaging times, forms and levels of the revised standards. Options for these alternatives will be developed as the

rulemaking proceeds.

Costs and Benefits: The Clean Air Act makes clear that the economic and technical feasibility of attaining standards are

not to be considered in setting or revising the NAAQS, although such factors may be considered in the development of State

plans to implement the standards. Accordingly, the Agency prepares cost and benefit information in order to provide States

information that may be useful in considering different implementation strategies for meeting proposed or final standards. Cost

and benefit information is not developed to support a NAAQS rulemaking until sufficient policy and scientific information is

available to narrow potential options for the form and level associated with any potential revisions to the standard. Therefore,

work on developing the plan for conducting the cost and benefit analysis will generally start 1 1/2 to 2 years following the start

of a NAAQS review.

Risks: During the course of this review, risk assessments have been conducted to evaluate health risks associated with

retention or revision of the particulate matter standards.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

106
NPRM 03/00/2011 

Final Action 11/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0492

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/air/particlepollution/

Agency Contact: Beth Hassett-Sipple Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4605 

FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: hassett-sipple.beth@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5274 

FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO50

 View Related Documents

Title: Measurement of PM 2.5 and PM 10 Emissions by Dilution Sampling

Abstract: This regulation describes the performance specifications and procedures for the measurement of particulate matter

with an aerodynamic size cut of both 10 microns and 2.5 microns using a dilution air technique to cause the formation of

condensable particulate matter. States which are in non-attainment of the national ambient air quality standards may need to

test with this method to determine what contribution specific sources cause to the particulate matter burden. The use of dilution

sampling was recommended by EPA’s Science Advisory Board. They believe that the dilution process simulates the formation

process that occurs for particles in the ambient air. A cyclonic separator is used to separate the particulate matter into size cuts

at 10 and 2.5 microns. The sample gas is then diluted and the condensable particles are formed and removed by filtration.

These procedures are somewhat more complicated and costly but provide lower potential for artifact formation. Testing will be

performed by the large emissions sources such as electric utilities, municipal incinerators, cement manufacturing, etc. in areas

which do not meet the ambient air standards of the national ambient air quality standards. We do not plan to publish a proposal

until the completion of the Method 201A/202 Revisions(SAN 5147)

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 app M (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 23 USC 101; 42 USC 7401–7671q

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5155

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 22

Agency Contact: Jason Dewees Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

107
Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-9724 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: Dewees.Jason@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Candace Sorrell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1064 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: sorrell.candace@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO66

 View Related Documents

Title: Plywood and Composite Wood Products (PCWP) NESHAP—Proposed & Final Amendments to Address "No Emission

Reduction" MACT Floors

Abstract: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ordered EPA to re-evaluate the MACT floor for

certain PCWP process unit groups. Among the issues to be addressed is MACT floors that had no emission reduction

requirements. To meet these regulatory obligations in the face of changing industry practices (e.g., resin reformulation) whose

emissions profiles and industry (e.g., MACT floor) impacts have not yet been determined, EPA intends to do the following: 1.

Develop an industry-wide survey for distribution late-2010 that focuses on the remand units, PCWP residual risk and technology

review, resin reformulations and other process changes. 2. Identify technologies, emission limits and/or work practices 3.

Assess risk / conduct technology review 4. Assess impacts and costs 5. Determine options and regulatory course of action

(anticipated timing is for a proposal in late 2011 and final in 2012).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5185

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 321999; 321213; 321211; 321219; 321212

Agency Contact: Bill Schrock Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5032 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: schrock.bill@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-5335 

E-Mail: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

108
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO70

 View Related Documents

Title: Adoption of International NOx Standard for Aircraft Engines

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the existing United States regulations governing the exhaust emissions from new

commercial aircraft gas turbine engines. This action would adopt standards equivalent to the NOx standards of the United

Nations International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and thereby bring the United States emission standards into alignment

with the internationally adopted standards. These NOx standards were adopted by ICAO's Committee on Aviation Environmental

Protection (CAEP) in 2004 and 2010. The proposed rule would establish consistency between United States and international

requirements. This action is necessary to ensure that domestic commercial aircraft meet the current international standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 87 (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7571

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Final Action 11/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5153

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 336412; 336411

Agency Contact: Bryan Manning Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

2000 Traverwood Dr.

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4832 

FAX: 734 214-4816

E-Mail: Manning.Bryan@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Glenn Passavant Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

USEPA

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4408 

E-Mail: Passavant.Glenn@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO72

 View Related Documents

Title: Review of the Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to review and, if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria for the primary

(health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On October 11,

1995, EPA published a final rule not to revise either the primary or secondary NAAQS for nitrogen dioxide (NO2). On May 22,

1996, EPA published a final decision that revisions of the primary and secondary NAAQS for sulfur dioxide (SO2) were not

appropriate at that time, aside from several minor technical changes. On December 9, 2005, EPA's Office of Research and

Development (ORD) initiated the current periodic review of NO2 air quality criteria with a call for information in the Federal

Register (FR). On May 3, 2006, ORD initiated the current periodic review of SO2 air quality criteria with a call for information in

the FR. Subsequently, the decision was made to review the oxides of nitrogen and the oxides of sulfur together, rather than

individually, with respect to a secondary welfare standard for NO2 and SO2. This decision derives from the fact that NO2, SO2,

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

109
and their associated transformation products are linked from an atmospheric chemistry perspective, as well as from an

environmental effects perspective, most notably in the case of secondary aerosol formation and acidification in ecosystems. This

review includes the preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment (ISA), Risk/Exposure Assessment (REA), and a Policy

Assessment Document (PAD) by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee and the

public. These documents inform the Administrator's proposed decision as to whether to retain or revise the standards. It should

be noted that this review will be limited to only the secondary standards; the primary standards for SO2 and NO2 were reviewed

separately. The ISA, REA and first draft PAD have been completed and a review of the second draft PAD by CASAC is

anticipated on October 6 and 7, 2010.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial The court has approved the amendments to the consent decree

incorporating the revised dates. 07/12/2011 

Other Judicial 03/20/2012 

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As established in the Clean Air Act, the national ambient air quality standards for oxides of nitrogen

and oxides of sulfur are to be reviewed every 5 years.

Legal Basis: Section 109 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409) directs the Administrator to propose and promulgate

"primary" and "secondary" national ambient air quality standards for pollutants identified under section 108 (the "criteria"

pollutants). The "primary" standards are established for the protection of public health, while "secondary" standards are to

protect against public welfare.

Alternatives: The main alternatives for the Administrator's decision on the review of the national ambient air quality

standards for oxides of nitrogen and oxides of sulfur are whether to retain or revise the existing standards.

Costs and Benefits: The Clean Air Act makes clear that the economic and technical feasibility of attaining standards are

not to be considered in setting or revising the NAAQS, although such factors may be considered in the development of State

plans to implement the standards. Accordingly, the Agency prepares cost and benefit information in order to provide States

information that may be useful in considering different implementation strategies for meeting proposed or final standards. Cost

and benefit information is not developed to support a NAAQS rulemaking until sufficient policy and scientific information is

available to narrow potential options for the form and level associated with any potential revisions to the standard. Therefore,

work on the developing the plan for conducting the cost and benefit analysis will generally start 1 1/2 to 2 years following the

start of a NAAQS review.

Risks: During the course of this review, risk assessments may be conducted to evaluate public welfare risks associated with

retention or revision of the NOx/SOx secondary standards.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2011 

Final Action 03/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-1145

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Bryan Hubbell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-0621 

FAX: 919 541-0804

E-Mail: Hubbell.bryan@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ginger Tennant Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

110
C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4072 

FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: Tennant.Ginger@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP05

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Reinforced Plastic Composites Production Rule Amendments

Abstract: In 2003, EPA issued national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for reinforced plastic composites

production (40 CFR 63 subpart WWWW), and this was followed by amendments in 2005. Following these amendments, industry

and states have asked for clarification and amendments of some rule requirements. This action will provide the needed

clarifications and amendments.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Final Action 04/00/2012 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5232

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Steve Shedd Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5397 

FAX: 919 685-3195

E-Mail: Shedd.Steve@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP06

 View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards for Grain Elevators—Amendments

Abstract: The New Source Performance Standard for Grain Elevators was promulgated in 1978 with the latest amendments

made in 1984. Since that time there have been a number of changes in the technology used for storing and loading/unloading

grain at elevators. Definitions in the current regulation do not fit some of the current technologies being used at elevators

throughout the country. These definitional issues have come to the forefront most recently due to the increase in ethanol

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

111
production that has lead to bumper crops of corn being grown, which has led to a need for increased grain storage. For these

reasons a review/change of these definitions is necessary to ensure the appropriate standards are being applied consistently

throughout the industry.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60.300 (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411; Clean Air Act sec 111; 15 USC 2005

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 12/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5233

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 115114

Agency Contact: Bill Schrock Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5032 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: schrock.bill@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-5335 

E-Mail: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP17

 View Related Documents

Title: Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Test Methods (Alternative Test Method for Olefins in

Gasoline)

Abstract: This rule would allow refiners and laboratories to use more current and improved fuel testing procedures for certain

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) analytical test methods. Once these test method changes are adopted, they

will supersede the corresponding earlier versions of these test methods in EPA’s motor vehicle fuel regulations. Finally, the rule

would allow an alternative test method for olefins in gasoline. This rule would allow improvements in the test method procedure

to ensure better operation and provide additional flexibility to the regulated community. The clean air benefits of EPA’s gasoline

and diesel motor vehicle fuel programs will continue to be realized. There will be no adverse health or environmental impact as

a result of these test method changes or updates.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 211

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 12/08/2008 73 FR 74350 

NPRM 12/08/2008 73 FR 74403 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

112
Partial Withdrawl of Direct Final Rule 02/06/2009 74 FR 6233 

Supplemental NPRM 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5261; EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2008/December/Day-08/a28372.pdf.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Joe Sopata Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6406J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9034 

FAX: 202 343-2801

E-Mail: Sopata.Joe@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP22

 View Related Documents

Title: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds—Exclusion of Methyl Iodide

Abstract: The EPA lists for regulation certain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as precursors to ozone formation under

section 302(s) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and 40 CFR 51.100(s). While all VOCs have the ability to react in the atmosphere to

form ozone, some VOCs react at such a slow rate their contribution to ground-level ozone is negligible. Through regulation, the

Agency can exempt negligibly reactive compounds from the definition of VOCs. VOCs that are exempted from the CAA

definition are no longer necessary to control in state implementation plans for attaining the national ambient air quality standard

for ozone. This rule would address whether EPA should exempt methyl iodide based on its reactivity. This compound is used as

a pesticide.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.100 (s) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA301

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: We are receiving assistance from the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program and

from Regional Office 4 and 9; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0350

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3356 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: Sanders.Dave@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: William L Johnson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27525 

Phone: 919 541-5245 

FAX: 919 541-0824

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

113
E-Mail: johnson.williaml@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP24

 View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the 2010 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone, Waiver of Stage II Vapor Recovery

Requirements and Anti-Backsliding Requirements for the Section 185 Fee Program

Abstract: This action would establish rules and policies for implementing the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality

standard (NAAQS) established through a final action reconsidering the 2008 8-hour ozone standard. This implementation rule

would addresses the classification system for designated nonattainment areas, anti-backsliding requirements for the 1997 ozone

standard, and the implementation requirements under the Clean Air Act, title I, part D, subparts 1 and 2 as they would apply to

a final 2010 standard, including requirements for attainment demonstrations, reasonable further progress, reasonably available

control technology (RACT), reasonably available control measures (RACM), nonattainment new source review (NSR), emission

inventory, and others. In addition, it would address the timing of SIP submissions, compliance periods, and attainment dates,

and would address other implementation topics.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7511 to 7511f; 42 USC 7601(a)(1)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0885

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Butch Stackhouse Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5208 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: Stackhouse.Butch@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Kimber Scavo Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3354 

FAX: 919 541-4028

E-Mail: scavo.kimber@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP26

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP Subpart W: Standards for Radon Emissions From Operating Uranium Mill Tailings: Review

Abstract: NESHAP subpart W protects human health and the environment by setting radon emission standards and work

practices for operating uranium mill tailings impoundments. EPA is in the process of reviewing this standard. If necessary, the

agency will revise the NESHAP requirements for radon emissions from operating uranium mill tailings.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

114
Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 61.250 - 61.256 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 08/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5281

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Reid Rosnick Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6608J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9563 

FAX: 202 343-2304

E-Mail: Rosnick.Reid@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Loren Setlow Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6608J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9445 

FAX: 202 343-2304

E-Mail: Setlow.Loren@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP34

 View Related Documents

Title: NSPS Equipment Leaks (Subpart VV SOCMI and GGG Petroleum Refineries); Amendments

Abstract: On November 16, 2007 EPA published amendments to the new source performance standards for equipment

leaks in 40 CFR part 60, subparts VV, and GGG, and promulgated new subparts VVa and GGGa. After promulgation of the rule

we received a petition for reconsideration from the American Chemistry Council (ACC), American Petroleum Institute (API), and

National Petrochemical Refiners Association (NPRA), which we granted in part on March 4, 2008. This action will address those

reconsideration issues.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 03/00/2011 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO90; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0699

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

115
Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Jodi Howard Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4607 

FAX: 919 541-0246

E-Mail: howard.jodi@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP41

 View Related Documents

Title: In-Use Emissions Testing for Nonroad Diesel Engines and Amendments to General Compliance Provisions for Nonroad

Engines

Abstract: This rulemaking will establish a manufacturer-run, in-use emissions testing program for 2013 and later model year

nonroad diesel engines used in non-road equipment. The new program will assess in-use gaseous and particulate exhaust

emission rates from nonroad diesel engines using portable emission measurement systems. Manufacturers will monitor

compliance with the applicable not-to-exceed emission standards by typically testing in-use diesel engines during normal

operation. If potentially non-complying engines are identified, the manufacturer will test more engines for the purpose of

determining if any further action is necessary. EPA will likewise evaluate the in-use emissions data to make independent

determinations about the possible need to pursue further testing or to initiate remedial actions. The in-use test data will not only

be used by EPA to assure that emission standards are being met, but also by manufacturers to improve their engine designs.

This program will address a serious, long-standing need for “real-world” in-use testing data to gauge the performance of engine

emission controls.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80; 40 CFR 1033; 40 CFR 1042; 40 CFR 1045; 40 CFR 54; 40 CFR 1065 (To search for a specific

CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 09/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5318

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 336112

Agency Contact: Rich Wilcox Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

NVFEL

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4390 

E-Mail: Wilcox.Rich@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Philip Carlson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

116
AANC

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4270 

E-Mail: Carlson.Philip@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP52

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units

Abstract: On May 18, 2005 (70 FR 28606), EPA published a final rule requiring reductions in emissions of mercury from

Electric Utility Steam Generating Units. That rule was vacated on February 8, 2008, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District

of Columbia Circuit. As a result of that vacatur, coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units remain on the list of

sources that must be regulated under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Agency will develop standards under CAA

section 112(d), which will reduce hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from this source category. Recent court decisions on

other CAA section 112(d) rules will be considered in developing this regulation.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112(d)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial No later than March 16, 2011, EPA shall sign for publication in the

Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking. 03/16/2011 

Other Judicial No later than November 16, 2011, EPA shall sign for publication in the

Federal Register a notice of final rulemaking. 11/16/2011 

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Section 112(n)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act required EPA to conduct a study of the hazards to public

health resulting from emissions of hazardous air pollutants from electric utility steam generating units and, after considering the

results of that study, determine whether it was appropriate and necessary to regulate such units under section 112. The study

was completed in 1998 and in December 2000, EPA determined that it was appropriate and necessary to regulate coal- and

oil-fired electric utility steam generating units and added such units to the list of sources for which standards must be developed

under section 112. The February 8, 2008, vacatur of the May 18, 2005, Clean Air Mercury Rule and March 29, 2005, section

112(n) Revision Rule (which had removed such sources from the list) resulted in the requirement to regulate under section 112

being reinstated.

Legal Basis: Clean Air Act, section 112

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: Not yet determined.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2011 

Final Action 11/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 221112

Agency Contact: Bill Maxwell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-01

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

117
Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5430 

FAX: 919 541-5450

E-Mail: maxwell.bill@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robert J Wayland Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C439-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1045 

E-Mail: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP61

 View Related Documents

Title: Control of Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicles

Abstract: This action will be jointly proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of

Transportation (DOT) to set national emission standards under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and Energy Independence and Security

Act (EISA) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel energy for heavy duty trucks and buses. This rulemaking

would significantly reduce GHG emissions from future heavy duty vehicles by setting GHG standards that would lead to the

introduction of GHG-reducing vehicle and engine technologies. This action follows the U.S. Supreme Court decision in

Massachusetts vs. EPA and would follow EPA’s formal determination on endangerment for GHG emissions. This rulemaking

also follows the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking "Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act," (73

FR 44354, Jul. 20, 2008).

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1036, 1037, 1066, and 1068 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 202

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: EPA recently proposed to find that emissions of greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and

engines cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and welfare.

Therefore, there is a need to reduce GHG emissions from medium- and heavy-duty vehicles to protect public health and

welfare. The medium- and heavy-duty truck sector accounts for approximately 18 percent of the U.S. mobile source GHG

emissions and is the second largest mobile source sector. GHG emissions from this sector are forecast to continue increasing

rapidly; reflecting the anticipated impact of factors such as economic growth and increased movement of freight by trucks. This

rulemaking would significantly reduce GHG emissions from future medium- and heavy-duty vehicles by setting GHG standards

that will lead to the introduction of GHG reducing vehicle and engine technologies.

Legal Basis: The Clean Air Act section 202(a)(1) states that "The Administrator shall by regulation prescribe (and from time

to time revise) in accordance with the provisions of this section, standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant from

any class or classes of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines, which in his judgment cause, or contribute to, air

pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare." Section 202(a) covers all on-highway

vehicles including medium- and heavy-duty trucks. In April 2007, the Supreme Court found in Massachusetts v. EPA that

greenhouse gases fit well within the Act’s capacious definition of “air pollutant” and that EPA has statutory authority to regulate

emission of such gases from new motor vehicles. Lastly, in April 2009, EPA issued the Proposed Endangerment and Cause or

Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act. The endangerment proposal stated that greenhouse gases

from new motor vehicles and engines cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public

health and welfare.

Alternatives: The rulemaking proposal will include an evaluation of regulatory alternatives that can be considered in addition

to the Agency's primary proposal. In addition, the proposal is expected to include tools such as averaging, banking, and trading

of emissions credits as an alternative approach for compliance with the proposed program.

Costs and Benefits: Detailed analysis of economy-wide cost impacts, greenhouse gas emission reductions, and societal

benefits will be performed during the rulemaking process. Initial estimates indicate that the vehicles produced during the first 5

years after implementation of the program could achieve reductions of up to 250 million metric ton of CO2 emissions during the

lifetime of these trucks. The costs associated with the GHG control technologies are expected to pay for themselves through

fuel cost savings within the first 2 to 5 years of the vehicle's life.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

118
Risks: The failure to set new GHG standards for medium- and heavy-duty trucks risks continued increases in GHG emissions

from the trucking industry and therefore increased risk of unacceptable climate change impacts.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 08/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5355.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Byron Bunker Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AAHDOC

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4155 

E-Mail: Bunker.Byron@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Angela Cullen Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AAHDOC

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4419 

E-Mail: Cullen.Angela@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP63

 View Related Documents

Title: Emissions Factors Program Improvements

Abstract: EPA intends to improve the air pollutant emissions factors program. Most EPA emissions factors reside in a

database called AP-42. In order to acquire adequate data for the development or improvement of the emissions factors, we are

seeking comment on requiring the submission (via electronic reporting) of certain performance testing information already

collected by industry. Performance tests are conducted to measure the air pollutant emissions from an industrial process and

used as an indicator of compliance with regulations. This last element of the process of improving the emissions factors program

will require formal rulemaking and will encompass performance testing required by Federal rules codified in 40 CFR parts 60,

61, and 63.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60, 61, and 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

ANPRM 10/14/2009 74 FR 52723 

ANPRM Comment Period End 11/13/2009 

ANPRM Comment Period Extended 11/13/2009 74 FR 58574 

ANPRM Comment Period End 12/14/2009 

NPRM 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: ANPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2009/October/Day-14/a24684.pdf ANPRM -

Extension of Public Comment Period - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?

objectId=0900006480a417c0&disposition=attachment&contentType=html

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

119
Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 11

Agency Contact: Tom Driscoll Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5135 

FAX: 919 541-4028

E-Mail: Driscoll.Tom@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Bob Schell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4116 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: Schell.Bob@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP66

 View Related Documents

Title: Alternative Work Practices for Leak Detection and Repair, Amendments

Abstract: On December 22, 2008, EPA published a voluntary alternative work practice for leak detection and repair using a

newly developed technology, optical gas imaging. After promulgation of the rule, the Agency received a request for

administrative reconsideration from American Petroleum Institute (API) on February 20, 2009. This package will address the

reconsideration issues.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 61; 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 65 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0197

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325211

Agency Contact: Jodi Howard Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4607 

FAX: 919 541-0246

E-Mail: howard.jodi@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

120
E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP71

 View Related Documents

Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reasonable Possibility in

Recordkeeping; Reconsideration

Abstract: The EPA is convening a proceeding for reconsideration of a final rule published in the Federal Register on

December 21, 2007 (72 FR 62607). The subject rule was promulgated in response to a remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for

the District of Columbia Circuit in New York v. EPA, 413 F.3d 3 (D.C. Cir. 2005), in order to clarify the "reasonable possibility"

recordkeeping and reporting standard under the New Source Review (NSR) program. After review of issues raised by the State

of New Jersey by petition and letter, we have decided to exercise our discretion to conduct a reconsideration of this final rule

and will therefore be reopening the public comment period for the rule. The rule will remain in effect while our reconsideration

proceeding is under way.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 app S; 40 CFR 51.165; 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the

Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA title 1 parts C and D

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2011 

Final Action 05/00/2012 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AN88; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2001-0004

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Agency Contact: David Painter Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5515 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: painter.david@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP72

 View Related Documents

Title: Proposal to Revise the Interpollutant Trading Policy for PM2.5 Offsets

Abstract: In 2010, EPA received and granted a petition from the National Resource Defense Council and Sierra Club for

reconsideration of 4 provisions contained in its May 16, 2008, final rule for implementing PM2.5 under the Prevention of

Significant Deterioration (PSD) program. The 4 challenged provisions include, (1) allowing states with State Implementation

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

121
Plan-approved PSD programs up to 3 years to revise and submit the new PM2.5 requirements to EPA for approval; (2) allowing

the same states to continue using EPA’s 1997 PM10 Surrogate Policy until such revisions are approved by EPA; (3) allowing

permit applicants to exclude, until January 1, 2010, any amounts of condensable particulate matter from the calculation of the

proposed source’s potential to emit for applicability purposes; and (4) allowing sources in PM2.5 nonattainment areas to use

emissions from precursors of PM2.5 as offsets for significant increases of PM2.5 emissions, using ratios developed by EPA or

ratios developed and demonstrated by the state. Issues 2 and 3 were addressed in earlier rulemakings, and we are taking no

action on issue 1. This action completes the proceeding for reconsidering the challenged provisions by addressing the

remaining issue (issue 4) associated with interpollutant offsets for PM2.5.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7501 et seq; 42 USC 7601(a)(1)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AN86. Split from RIN 2060-AK74.; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR2003-0062

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Agency Contact: Dan deRoeck Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5593 

FAX: 919 685-3009

E-Mail: Deroeck.Dan@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP76

 View Related Documents

Title: Oil and Natural Gas Sector—New Source Performance Standards, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants, and Control Techniques Guidelines

Abstract: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) regulate criteria pollutants from new stationary sources. Two NSPS

(subparts KKK and LLL) for the oil and natural gas industry were promulgated in 1985. Section 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA)

requires that NSPS be reviewed every 8 years and revised as appropriate. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants (NESHAP) regulate hazardous air pollutants (HAP) from new and existing stationary sources. Two NESHAP (subparts

HH and HHH) for the oil and natural gas industry were promulgated in 1999. Section 112 of the CAA requires that NESHAP be

reviewed every 8 years and revised as appropriate. In addition, section 112(f) requires that each category regulated under

section 112(d) be reviewed to ensure that such regulations provide for an ample margin of safety to protect public health (i.e.

address "residual risk" for each category). This action will include the required reviews under sections 111 and 112. The

development of control techniques guidelines (CTG) for criteria pollutants will also be done under this action. Since the existing

regulations are narrow in scope, the reviews will include consideration of broadening the scope of operations and emissions

points covered by the NSPS and the MACT.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

122
Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 and 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411 and 7412

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Consent Decree entered 02/04/2010 01/31/2011 

Other Judicial Consent Decree entered 02/04/2010 11/30/2011 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Final Action 11/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Bruce Moore Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5460 

FAX: 919 541-0246

E-Mail: Moore.Bruce@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP84

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP Standard Standards for Petroleum Refineries—Heat Exchangers

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112(d)(6), EPA is required to review standards issued under section 112

and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less

frequently than every 8 years. EPA also must evaluate the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards within 8

years after promulgation and promulgate standards under CAA section 112 (f)(2) if required to provide an ample margin of

safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. We are currently reviewing our existing standards and

also the underlying rules that are often referenced by these standards. As a result of this review, we have noted the need to

consolidate rule requirements, and to update control requirements based on the risk and technology reviews under both section

112 and 111. Additionally, we recognize that most chemical and refinery sector operations have similar emission sources that

are often required to be controlled to the similar levels by the same type of control devices and work practice standards,

although on a piecemeal fashion such that the requirements may differ slightly from source to source without any tangible

environmental benefits. We are therefore developing a limited number of rules (standard standards) that are consistent and that

can be applied to numerous sources in the chemicals and refining sector. This effort will consist of developing the heat

exchanger standard, including developing control options to address technology review under both 112 and 111, addressing the

control of VOC, HAP, and other pollutants, as appropriate, estimating the impacts of regulatory options, emission reductions,

impacts on risk, costs, cost effectiveness, and economic impacts for the refining and chemicals sector.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

123
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AP70. Split from RIN 2060-AO55. Split from RIN 2060-AN85; EPA Docket

information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003--0146

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32411

Agency Contact: Bob Lucas Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-0884 

FAX: 919 541-0246

E-Mail: lucas.bob@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP89

 View Related Documents

Title: Federal Reference Method for Lead in Total Suspended Particulate Matter

Abstract: On November 12, 2008 EPA substantially strengthened the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for

lead. EPA revised the level of the primary (health-based) standard from 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3) to 0.15μg/m3,

measured as total suspended particles (TSP) and revised the secondary (welfare-based) standard to be identical in all respects

to the primary standard. In conjunction with strengthening the lead (Pb) NAAQS, EPA identified the need for states to improve

existing lead monitoring networks. Depending on specific circumstances, States may have the option of using monitoring for

either lead in TSP (Pb-TSP) or lead in PM10 (Pb-PM10) using approved Federal Reference Methods (FRMs) or Federal

Equivalent Methods (FEMs) to meet monitoring requirements. To support new monitoring requirements, an FRM for Pb-PM10

was developed with the November 8, 2008 rulemaking. The FRM for Pb-TSP was left unchanged. The Pb-TSP FRM was

promulgated in 1978. EPA recognizes that significant advances in measurement technology have been made since the

promulgation of the original FRM. In order to support new monitoring requirements for Pb-TSP and update the FRM to improve

it based on advanced measurement technology, a new FRM must be developed.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7403,7410,7601(a),7611,7618

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 10/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5388

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

124
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Joann Rice Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C304-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3372 

FAX: 919 541-1903

E-Mail: Rice.Joann@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lewis Weinstock Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C304-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3661 

FAX: 919 541-1903

E-Mail: Weinstock.Lewis@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP92

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2011 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide

Abstract: Methyl bromide was phased out under the Clean Air Act and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the

Ozone Layer in 2005, except for limited exemptions. This action would authorize uses that will qualify for the 2011 critical use

exemption from the phaseout of methyl bromide, and would also authorize the amount of methyl bromide that may be produced,

imported, or supplied from inventory for those uses in 2011. Absent this rulemaking, production and import of methyl bromide for

critical uses would be zero for 2011. EPA takes this action under the authority of the Clean Air Act to reflect recent consensus

Decisions taken by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol at the 21st Meeting of the Parties. This action also invites comment on

a possible end date for the critical use exemption program. Since this rulemaking would confer a benefit by exempting the

production and use of a phased-out chemical, there is no significant adverse impact on small entities.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671c(d)(6)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory without this action, new production/import of methyl bromide would not

be allowed in 2011. 12/31/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 05/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0321

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr

Agency Contact: Jeremy Arling Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

125
Phone: 202 343-9055 

FAX: 202 343-2338

E-Mail: Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP93

 View Related Documents

Title: Revision of New Source Performance Standards for New Residential Wood Heaters

Abstract: EPA is revising the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for residential wood heaters under the Clean Air

Act section 111(b)(1)(B). This action is necessary because it updates the 1988 NSPS to reflect significant advancements in

wood heater technologies and design, broaden the range of residential wood heating appliances covered by the regulation, and

improve and streamline implementation procedures. This rule is expected to require manufacturers to redesign wood heaters to

be cleaner and lower emitting. In general, the design changes will also make the heaters perform better and be more efficient.

The revisions are also expected to retain the requirement for manufacturers to contract for testing of model lines by third-party

independent laboratories, report the results to EPA, and label the models accordingly. This action does not apply to existing

residential woodstoves, pellet stoves and other residential biomass heating units.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA sec 111

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2011 

Final Action 07/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 333414

Agency Contact: Gil Wood Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C404-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5272 

FAX: 919 541-0242

E-Mail: Wood.Gil@epa.gov

Agency Contact: David Cole Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C404-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5565 

FAX: 919 541-0242

E-Mail: Cole.David@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP94

 View Related Documents

Title: National VOC Emission Standards for Architectural Coatings; Amendments

Abstract: This action amends the existing Architectural Coatings Rule at 40 CFR part 59, subpart D to update the categories

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

126
and limits to make them consistent with the Ozone Transport Commission model rule. This action is being done in response to a

Clean Air Act Advisory Committee recommendation. This action was originally combined with similar amendments for consumer

and commercial products under the "National VOC Emission Standards for Consumer Products; Amendments" (RIN 2060-AI62).

However, it has now been determined that the other source categories in 2060-AI62 will be delayed due to the need for further

analysis, and EPA has decided to separate out the Architectural Coatings piece as a separate rulemaking.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 59 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7511b

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3255

Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5335 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: Dunkins.Robin@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP96

 View Related Documents

Title: Malfunction Amendments to Part 63 Standards

Abstract: This action will amend regulations in the General Provisions of regulations promulgated under the Clean Air Act

(subpart A of part 63) that provide for or are related to an exemption from the requirement to comply with Clean Air Act section

112 emission standards during startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) events. On December 19, 2008, in Sierra Club v.

EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the SSM. These General Provisions are not

specific to any source category and apply when incorporated into source category-specific standards. In addition, other

subparts with similar provisions will be amended so that applicable standards will no longer have exceptions for sources that

report malfunction conditions, to reflect the court vacatur.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Matthew Witosky Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D205-02

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

127
Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2865 

E-Mail: witosky.matthew@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D205-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5060 

FAX: 919 541-5600

E-Mail: conner.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP97

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Elemental Phosphorous Production

Abstract: Well-established procedures for determining MACT will be followed in this project, and no new or novel issues are

being raised by this rulemaking. We are engaged with Agency and other stakeholders, and will continue to develop this MACT

standard with their involvement. Elemental Phosphorus Production was not listed as one of the categories on the Source

Category list to be regulated under Clean Air Act section 112. However, we have received petitions from States to develop a

Maximum Available Control Technology (MACT) standard for this category. We plan to list this source category at proposal.

Elemental phosphorous production includes mining, sizing, and calcining phosphate ore, and then blending it with silica and

coke before melting in a furnace under reduced conditions. Elemental phosphorous gases are evolved from the furnace and

captured, then condensed in a cooling process and transferred into tanks and cylinders under pressure. Slag (waste) is tapped

from the bottom of the furnace and discarded. The production processes emit particulate matter (PM); toxic metals including

radionuclides, selenium and mercury (Hg); and hydrogen cyanide (HCN). All of the elemental phosphorous in the US is

produced at one (Monsanto) plant and about 90% of it is used as a raw material for the production of Roundup(c), a Monsanto

product. The remainder is used as a food grade additive and for military purposes. There are no small business issues with this

project. The facility presents Environmental Justice concerns. The facility is located within the hunting, fishing, and gathering

grounds of three Indian tribes on the Fort Hall Indian Reservation, and shares the watershed and major rivers with the tribes.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 05/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Susan Fairchild Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5167 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: fairchild.susan@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2837 

FAX: 919 541-4991

E-Mail: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

128
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ01

 View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Test Methods and Testing Regulations

Abstract: This action will make needed corrections and updates to source testing methods and testing provisions in 40 CFR

parts 60, 61, and 63. For example, Method 5, which determines particulate matter from stationary sources is being edited to

remove silica gel as the prescribed drying agent. Silica gel has been listed as a potential carcinogen and other agents that are

safer and more environmentally friendly are being prescribed. In Method 2, which determines stack gas velocity, a misplaced

square root sign in one of the equations is being corrected. This is a periodic action that is done every several years to keep the

rules up-to-date and to ensure that compliance testing and monitoring are done correctly.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51, 60, 61, and 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7601

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0114

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Foston Curtis Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1063 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: Curtis.Foston@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-7774 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: Oldham.Conniesue@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ04

 View Related Documents

Title: Determination of Confidential Business Information Collected Under the GHG Mandatory Reporting Program

Abstract: On September 22, 2009, the Administrator signed a final rule establishing Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reporting

requirements for approximately 10,000 facilities and suppliers in the U.S. Monitoring starts January 1, 2010, and the first reports

are due to EPA on March 31, 2011. In anticipation of releasing the data we collect to the public, EPA is launching an effort to

proactively determine which data elements we collect are confidential business information, considering the definition of

"emissions data" under the Clean Air Act. We will provide the public and reporters an opportunity to comment and then issue

our final determination. This process needs to be completed before releasing the data to the public in 2011.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86, 87, 89, 90, 94, and 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

129
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5242.2; EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-

5711.pdf; Split from RIN 2060-AO79; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Agency Contact: Carole Cook Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6207J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9334 

E-Mail: Cook.Carole@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lisa Grogan-McCulloch Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6207J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9743 

E-Mail: Grogan-McCulloch.Lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ05

 View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to In-Use Testing for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles; Emissions Measurement and Instrumentation;

Not-to-Exceed Emission Standards; and Technical Amendments for Off-Highway Engines

Abstract: This Direct Final Rule makes several revisions to EPA’s mobile source emission standards and test procedures.

First, due to a delay in developing the final particulate matter (PM) accuracy margin for portable emission measurement

systems, we are delaying the first year of the fully enforceable PM in-use testing program for the heavy-duty diesel vehicles from

the 2009 calendar year to the 2010 calendar year. During the 2009 calendar year, there will be another year of pilot program

testing for that pollutant. Second, we are allowing railroads to install a limited number of remanufactured engines that do not

comply with the most recent emission standards. Third, we are clarifying the analytical requirements for in-use PM

measurement. Fourth, we are making changes to allow partial flow dilution sampling for transient test cycle PM measurement.

Fifth, we are clarifying how to account for emission control system regeneration events when calculating not-to-exceed (NTE)

results. Sixth, we are making changes to allow the use of fuel rate information derived from the engine control module (ECM) to

determine NTE mass emission rate. Seventh, we are specifying a later notification deadline for small-volume manufacturers of

marine SI engines that want to qualify for a two-year delay in the new exhaust emission standards. Eighth, and finally, we are

clarifying how our prohibitions apply with respect to handheld small SI engines installed in non-handheld equipment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule 11/08/2010 75 FR 68448 

NPRM 11/08/2010 75 FR 68575 

NPRM Comment Period End 12/08/2010 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

130
Additional Information: SAN No. 5407

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Chris Laroo Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

NVFEL

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4937 

E-Mail: Laroo.Chris@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Rich Wilcox Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

NVFEL

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4390 

E-Mail: Wilcox.Rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ07

 View Related Documents

Title: RACT Issues for Implementation of the 1997 PM2.5 and Ozone NAAQS

Abstract: This action will modify policies related to the state requirements for Reasonably Available Control Measures

(RACM) and Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for electric generating units and certain other large emission

sources in the rules addressing implementation of the 1997 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the

1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. This action will revise the policies on how states determine whether RACT

requirements can be satisfied by regional emissions trading programs such as the NOx Budget Program and the Clean Air

Interstate Rule. This action will also respond to a petition to reconsider how economic feasibility is considered in RACT

determinations made under the PM2.5 Implementation Rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5411

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 221112

Agency Contact: William L Johnson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27525 

Phone: 919 541-5245 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: johnson.williaml@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-5592 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

131
FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ10

 View Related Documents

Title: Review of New Source Performance Standards for Nitric Acid Plants—Subpart G

Abstract: Section 111(b)(1)(B) of the Clean Air act mandates that EPA review and if appropriate revise existing New Source

Performance Standards (NSPS) at least every 8 years. This NSPS was initially promulgated in 1971. This NSPS was reviewed

in 1979 and 1984. On January 2010, consent decree was entered into US District Court between EPA and several

environmental groups.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 11/12/2010 

Other Judicial 11/14/2011 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 11/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5416

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Bill Neuffer Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5435 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: Neuffer.Bill@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Tina Ndoh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D205-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2750 

FAX: 919 541-5600

E-Mail: Ndoh.Christina@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ17

 View Related Documents

Title: Regulation to Prevent the Misfueling of Vehicles and Engines With Gasoline Containing Greater Than Ten Volume

Percent Ethanol and Modifications to the Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline Programs

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act section 211(c) this rulemaking proposes to control and regulate distribution of fuels and

fuel additives that may pose harm to the environment or public health. Vehicles or engines not certified or approved for gasoline

containing greater than 10% ethanol ("E10+") may experience increased emissions of criteria pollutants and accelerated

deterioration of emission control systems due to higher oxygen content from increased ethanol levels. These emission

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

132
increases will have an adverse effect on air quality and public health. Furthermore, vehicles/engines operating on E10+ may

experience operability issues leading to tampering of certified configurations designed to satisfy EPA emissions requirements.

This rulemaking proposes to prevent misfueling by prohibiting the use of E10+ in vehicles/engines not approved to use E10+

and by requiring a label on the fuel pump. This rulemaking also proposes to modify the Reformulated Gasoline (“RFG”) program

(40 CFR part 80) to update the Complex Model allowing fuel manufacturers to certify batches of gasoline containing up to 15%

ethanol (“E15”). These modifications are required for fuel manufacturers to sell E15. This proposed rulemaking is necessary

because of the proliferation of "blenderpumps"—pumps that allow consumers to select E10+ blend levels—and the Agency's

pending waiver decision under the Clean Air Act section 211(f)(4) which, if granted, would allow for E15 use in some

vehicles/engines. Such a waiver and the expansion of blenderpumps create a need for a label to ensure that consumers do not

fuel their vehicles or engines with unapproved fuels.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA 211(c)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/04/2010 75 FR 68044 

NPRM Comment Period End 01/03/2011 

Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5438.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 325193

Agency Contact: Barry Garelick Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6406J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9028 

E-Mail: Garelick.Barry@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robert Anderson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6405J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9718 

E-Mail: Anderson.Robert@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ28

 View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review for Petroleum Refineries (Subpart J)—Response to

Reconsideration—Other Issues

Abstract: On June 24, 2008, EPA promulgated amendments to the Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries and

new standards for process units constructed, reconstructed, or modified after May 14, 2007. EPA received three petitions for

reconsideration of the final rule. On September 26, 2008, EPA granted reconsideration and issued a stay for the issues raised

in the petitions regarding process heaters and flares. EPA also proposed various technical corrections in that action that were

raised in the petitions for reconsideration. At that time, EPA also agreed to reconsider other issues in future notices. Under this

action, EPA will address the other issues raised by Petitioners.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

133
Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2011 

Final Action 10/00/2012 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AN72; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0011

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32411

Agency Contact: Brenda Shine Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C439-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3608 

FAX: 919 685-3219

E-Mail: shine.brenda@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ29

 View Related Documents

Title: Stationary Combustion Turbine NSPS Amendments to Address UARG Reconsideration Petition

Abstract: EPA is proposing to amend specific provisions in the NSPS for stationary combustion turbines to resolve issues

and questions raised by the utility air regulatory group (UARG) on the original final rulemaking published on July 6, 2006 (71 FR

38482), and to address other technical and editorial issues that have been identified since promulgation. The primary issues

raised in the petition include the NOx standard and the monitoring and reporting requirements for owners/operators that elect to

install NOx CEMS. This proposed rule would also amend the location and wording of existing paragraphs to clarify the

requirements of the NSPS. It would also exempt owners/operators of stationary combustion turbines that meet the applicability

criteria of and that are complying with the SO2 standard in either subparts J or Ja (standards of performance for petroleum

refineries) or only burn fuels containing inherently low amounts of sulfur from complying with the otherwise applicable SO2 limit

in subpart KKKK. In addition, we are requesting comment on how to address combustion turbine engines that are overhauled or

refurbished off site in such a manner that neither the owner, operator, or manufacturer can identify which components have

been replaced and, therefore, cannot conduct the otherwise required reconstruction analysis. Also, in recognition that the ultralow sulfur diesel requirements include Hawaii, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands we are intending and

requesting comment on requiring owner/operators of turbines in these locations to meet the same sulfur requirements as

owner/operators of turbines located in State territories. Finally, we are proposing to require electronic reporting of performance

tests.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA 111

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

134
Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO23; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0490

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 211111; 2211; 211112; 48621; 221

Agency Contact: Christian Fellner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-4003 

FAX: 919 541-5450

E-Mail: fellner.christian@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Melanie King Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2469 

E-Mail: king.melanie@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ37

 View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards for Electric Utility and Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units

Abstract: This action will amend the NOx, SO2, and PM standards in the utility NSPS and assure proper monitoring.

Conforming amendments to the industrial boiler NSPS will also be proposed to assure consistent monitoring for the various

boiler rules. In addition the action will make multiple corrections to the boiler NSPS. It will also respond to the Utility Air

Regulatory Group's (UARG) request for reconsideration of the January 2009 final amendments to the boiler NSPS. Issues

specific to UARG's request include: 1) appropriate monitoring provisions for owners/operators of affected facilities subject to an

opacity standard, but exempt from the requirement to install a continuous opacity monitoring system, and 2) the relevance of an

opacity standard for owners/operators of affected facilities using a continuous emissions monitoring system.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA 111

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Consent decree - included with SAN 5349 - Utility MACT consent decree 03/16/2011 

Other Judicial Consent decree - included with SAN 5349 - Utility MACT consent decree 11/16/2011 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2011 

Final Action 11/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: Not yet determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 221112

Agency Contact: Christian Fellner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

135
1200 Pennsylvania Ave

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-4003 

FAX: 919 541-5450

E-Mail: fellner.christian@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ38

 View Related Documents

Title: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds—Exclusion of trans 1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene and 2,3,3,3-

tertrafluoropropene

Abstract: This action proposes to add trans 1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene and 2,3,3,3-tertrafluoropropene to the list of negligibly

reactive compounds in the definition of volatile organic compounds. Data indicate that the photochemical reactivity of these

compounds is low enough that they can be regarded as negligibly reactive in ozone formation and will not contribute to violations

of the ozone national ambient air quality standard. The compound 2,3,3,3-tertrafluoropropene has been identified as a possible

substitute for a high global warming compound which is currently used in automobile air conditioners.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Section 302(s) of the CAA

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: William L Johnson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27525 

Phone: 919 541-5245 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: johnson.williaml@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Geoffrey Wilcox Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 202 564-5601 

E-Mail: wilcox.geoffrey@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ39

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Extension of Global Laboratory and Analytical Use Exemption for Essential Class I

Ozone Depleting Substances

Abstract: This rule would extend the global laboratory and analytical use exemption for the production and import of Class I

ozone depleting substances through December 31, 2014. This exemption currently expires December 31, 2011. This action is

consistent with recent actions by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

136
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA sec 604; 42 USC 7414, 7601, 7671 to 7671q

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Date when current exemption expires 12/31/2011 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2011 

Final Action 08/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/exemptions/laboratory.html

Agency Contact: Mollie Lemon Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9859 

E-Mail: lemon.mollie@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ41

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP Risk and Technology Review for Pulp and Paper Industry and Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources, and

NSPS Review for Kraft Pulp Mills

Abstract: The 2004 National Academy of Sciences' (NAS) report recommended that EPA begin conducting integrated

assessments that consider multiple pollutants (criteria and hazardous air pollutants, and other chemicals that may be of

concern) and multiple effects (health, ecosystem, visibility) to set standards and develop planning and control strategies. In

response to this recommendation, EPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) intends to conduct an

integrated review and assessment that addresses regulatory obligations under both the National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants and the New Source Performance Standards programs (NSPS). Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act

(CAA) directs EPA to conduct risk assessments on each source category subject to maximum achievable control technology

(MACT) standards, and to determine if additional standards are needed to reduce residual risks, to be completed 8 years after

promulgation. Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires EPA to review and revise the MACT standards as necessary, taking into

account developments in practices, processes and control technologies, to be done at least every 8 years. The NESHAP for

Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills (subpart MM) was

promulgated in 2001 and has not been reviewed. Similarly, the NESHAP for the Pulp and Paper Industry (subpart S) was

promulgated in 1998 and also has not been reviewed. Section 111(b)(1)(B) of the CAA mandates that EPA review and, if

appropriate, revise existing New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at least every 8 years. The Kraft Pulp Mill NSPS was

promulgated in 1978 and is in need of review. This NSPS component of this action will include reviewing existing emission limits

for particulate matter, total reduced sulfur, and opacity and evaluating the appropriateness of developing emission limits for other

pollutants such as sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxide, and carbon dioxide.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2011 

Final Action 12/00/2011 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

137
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Bill Schrock Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5032 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: schrock.bill@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-5335 

E-Mail: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ42

 View Related Documents

Title: Risk and Technology Review NESHAP for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) and Wood Furniture

Manufacturing

Abstract: This action would conduct residual risk and technology reviews for two industrial source categories regulated by

two National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating), and

Wood Furniture Manufacturing. The underlying national emission standards that are under review in this action limit and control

hazardous air pollutants. Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs EPA to assess the risk remaining (residual risk)

after the application of the NESHAP and promulgate additional standards if warranted to provide an ample margin of safety to

protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. Also, section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires EPA to review and

revise the NESHAP as necessary at least every 8 years, taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control

technologies. This action would conduct those reviews for the two source categories cited above.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 11/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Kaye Whitfield Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2509 

FAX: 919 541-1039

E-Mail: whitfield.kaye@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-5335 

E-Mail: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

138
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ43

 View Related Documents

Title: Residual Risk and Technology Review: Primary Lead Smelting

Abstract: This action is the Risk and Technology Review (RTR) for Primary Lead Smelters. It will address both EPA's

obligation under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6) to conduct a residual risk review and to conduct a

technology review. Under the "technology review" provision of CAA section 112, EPA is required to review maximum achievable

control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them “as necessary (taking into account developments in practices,

processes and control technologies)” no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of CAA section

112, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide

an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory 07/27/2010 

NPRM Judicial 01/31/2011 

Other Judicial 10/31/2011 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Final Action 11/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-030

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Sharon Nizich Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2825 

FAX: 919 541-5450

E-Mail: nizich.sharon@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2837 

FAX: 919 541-4991

E-Mail: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ44

 View Related Documents

Title: Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA is required to review and if appropriate revise the air quality

criteria for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5

years. On November 12, 2008, EPA published a final rule to revise the primary and secondary NAAQS for lead to provide

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

139
increased protection for public health and welfare. With regard to the primary standard, EPA revised the level to 0.15

micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) of lead in total suspended particles and the averaging time to a rolling 3-month period with

a maximum (not-to-be-exceeded) form, evaluated over a 3-year period. EPA revised the secondary standard to be identical in

all respects to the revised primary standard. EPA has now initiated the next review. The review began in May 2010 with a

workshop to discuss key policy-relevant issues around which EPA would structure the review. This review includes the

preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment, and if warranted, a Risk/Exposure Assessment and also a Policy Assessment

Document by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee and the public. These

documents inform the Administrator's proposed decision as to whether to retain or revise the standards.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As established in the Clean Air Act, the national ambient air quality standards for lead are to be

reviewed every 5 years.

Legal Basis: Section 109 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409) directs the Administrator to propose and promulgate

"primary" and "secondary" national ambient air quality standards for pollutants identified under section 108 (the "criteria"

pollutants). The "primary" standards are established for the protection of public health, while "secondary" standards are to

protect against public welfare.

Alternatives: The main alternatives for the Administrator's decision on the review of the national ambient air quality

standards for lead are whether to retain or revise the existing standards.

Costs and Benefits: The Clean Air Act makes clear that the economic and technical feasibility of attaining standards are

not to be considered in setting or revising the NAAQS, although such factors may be considered in the development of State

plans to implement the standards. Accordingly, the Agency prepares cost and benefit information in order to provide States

information that may be useful in considering different implementation strategies for meeting proposed or final standards. Cost

and benefit information is not developed to support a NAAQS rulemaking until sufficient policy and scientific information is

available to narrow potential options for the form and level associated with any potential revisions to the standard. Therefore,

work on developing the plan for conducting the cost and benefit analysis will generally start 1 1/2 to 2 years following the start

of a NAAQS review.

Risks: During the course of this review, risk assessments may, as warranted, be conducted to evaluate health and/or

environmental risks associated with retention or revision of the lead standards.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013 

Final Action 10/00/2014 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0108

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pb/s_pb_index.html

Agency Contact: Deirdre Murphy Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-0729 

E-Mail: murphy.deirdre@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5274 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

140
FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ46

 View Related Documents

Title: Direct Final Amending Monitoring Requirements of the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Steam

Generating Units

Abstract: EPA is issuing direct final amendments (and the corresponding parallel proposal) of the monitoring requirements in

the electric utility and boiler New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). Since promulgation of the 2009 final amendments,

EPA has issued an information collection request (ICR) to the electric utility sector that requires condensable particulate matter

(PM) testing from a substantial number of units. We have determined that this ICR will provide sufficient data to determine both

if a standard is appropriate, and, in the event a standard is appropriate, the level of the standard. Therefore, the testing

requirement in the NSPS is no longer necessary and represents an unnecessary burden to the regulated community.

Consequently, the direct final would eliminate the testing requirement. In addition, questions about the intent of the 2009

amendments to the opacity monitoring requirements and been raised, and the direct final amendments will delay the amended

opacity monitoring requirements until January 1, 2012. We intend to complete the remand to the boiler NSPS prior to January 1,

2012 and will be able to take comment on and address the opacity monitoring in the remand. Finally, the direct final

amendments will correct three recently identified errors in the regulatory text.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA 111

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Direct Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO61; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ-OAR–2005–0031

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 221112

Agency Contact: Christian Fellner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-4003 

FAX: 919 541-5450

E-Mail: fellner.christian@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Bill Maxwell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5430 

FAX: 919 541-5450

E-Mail: maxwell.bill@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ47

 View Related Documents

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

141
Title: Reconsideration of the Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions in the Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment

New Source Review

Abstract: EPA is proposing to reconsider the final rule titled, “Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and

Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reconsideration of Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions,” published on December 19,

2008 (73 FR 77881). Through a letter signed on April 24, 2009, EPA granted reconsideration on a petition submitted by

National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), as well as an administrative stay. In addition to the three-month administrative

stay, EPA proposed and finalized an additional 18 month stay to allow enough time to propose, take public comment on, and

issue a final action concerning the inclusion of fugitive emissions in the federal PSD program. The additional 18 month stay

became effective on March 31, 2010 (75 FR 16102). EPA will consider the petition for reconsideration, public comments, and

information contained in the rulemaking docket to reach a decision on the reconsideration and finalize the rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial The additional 18 month stay ends Oct. 2011. 10/31/2011 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2011 

Final Action 08/00/2012 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AM91.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Peter Keller Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5339 

FAX: 919 541-4028

E-Mail: keller.peter@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: rao.raj@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ48

 View Related Documents

Title: Revision to the Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule

Abstract: This action will update the 2007 implementation rule for the PM2.5 national ambient air quality standards (PM2.5

NAAQS). The 2007 rule provided a basic regulatory framework for state plans to attain the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, and this basic

guidance framework remains in place for state implementation plans due in 2012 to attain the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. This new

rulemaking provides clarifications and revisions only for certain sections of the 2007 rule. The revised rule plus the original 2007

rule will provide comprehensive guidance for implementing the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS and any future revisions to the PM2.5

NAAQS

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

142
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 57.100 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-5592 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Kimber Scavo Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3354 

FAX: 919 541-4028

E-Mail: scavo.kimber@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AH23

 View Related Documents

Title: Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems

Abstract: This rulemaking adds a procedure 3 to appendix F of 40 CFR part 60. This action provides quality assurance

specifications for continuous opacity monitor system (COMS) installed for compliance. States may also cite this procedure for

sources with installed COMS subject to compliance limitations. Minimum quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA)

requirements are specified to assess the quality of COMS performance. Daily zero and span checks, quarterly performance

audits, and annual zero alignment checks are required in order to assure the proper functioning of the COMS and the accuracy

of the COMS data.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/28/2001 66 FR 12780 

NPRM Comment Period End 03/28/2001 

Final Action 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 3958; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0115.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/proposed/m203.pdf

Agency Contact: Jason Dewees Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

143
Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-9724 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: Dewees.Jason@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-7774 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: Oldham.Conniesue@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AH37

 View Related Documents

Title: Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country

Abstract: EPA is developing federal regulations governing preconstruction permitting of minor stationary sources throughout

Indian country and major stationary sources of air pollution in nonattainment areas in Indian country. Pursuant to the Tribal Air

Rule, eligible Indian tribes may receive EPA authorization to develop and implement such programs, but these permitting

programs would be implemented by EPA if eligible Indian tribes do not elect, or do not receive authorization, to manage such

programs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 49.51 to 49.161; 49 CFR 49.166 to 49.173 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/21/2006 71 FR 48696 

NPRM Comment Period End 03/20/2007 

Final Action 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 3975; EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=090000648024964a; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2003-0076.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Agency Contact: Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3407 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Montanez.Jessica@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

144
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AI97

 View Related Documents

Title: Inspection/Maintenance Program Requirements for Federal Facilities; Amendment to the Final Rule

Abstract: EPA has had an oversight and policy development authority for Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) programs since

the passage of the Clean Air Act (CAA) in 1970. The 1977 amendments to the CAA mandated I/M for certain areas with longterm air quality problems and the 1990 amendments set for standards for the implementation of I/M programs. EPA used the

statutory requirements of the Act, including I/M requirements for Federal facilities to promulgate regulations with States would

use in the development of their IM State Implementation Plans (SIPs). The Department of Justice ruled that Federal sovereign

immunity was not fully waived under the CAA for those requirements and recommended that EPA either issue guidance or

amend its rule to address I/M requirements for Federal Facilities. Originally, EPA intended to: (1) Amend the Federal facilities

I/M requirements by removing that section; (2) correct existing I/M SIP approval actions with included these elements; (3)

establish new Federal facilities I/M program requirements which Federal facilities in I/M program areas must meet in order to

comply with the Act; and (4) designate for each State which section of the Act Federal agencies must comply with based on how

that State promulgated it's I/M regulations. These changes were predicted to have minimal to no impact on the States, as no

new requirements were being created. The States would have been under no obligation, legal or otherwise, to modify existing

SIPs meeting the previously applicable requirement as a result of the EPA's intended action, and emissions reduction credits

would not have been affected. The intention of the originally planned rule change was to clarify for affected Federal facilities

what they must do to meet the CAA requirements. Subsequent to placing this intended action on EPA's regulatory agenda, the

decision was made to issue guidance to the facilities instead, clarifying the CAA's requirements with regard to Federal facilities.

Guidance was deemed the more timely way of getting this information to the entities in question. This guidance, which was

issued in December 1999, has proven sufficient.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (Revision); 40 CFR 93 (New) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations

) 

Legal Authority: 23 USC 101; 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 11/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 92

Agency Contact: Kathryn Sargeant Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6406

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4441 

FAX: 734 214-4052

E-Mail: Sargeant.Kathryn@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Sara Schneeberg Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

2344A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-5592 

E-Mail: schneeberg.sara@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AJ82

 View Related Documents

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

145
Title: Modification of the Anti-Dumping Baseline Date Cut-Off Limit for Data Used in Development of an Individual Baseline

Abstract: "Dumping" refers to the practice whereby refiners making clean fuels for certain markets (such as reformulated

gasoline for clean-air purposes) take the pollutants removed from the clean fuels and "dump" them into other fuels they are

producing for other markets. This, if allowed, would make those other fuels even dirtier than before, and so the Clean Air Act

prohibits this practice. EPA has existing "anti-dumping" rules on the books that codify this Clean Air Act prohibition. This

regulation is a minor technical amendment to those existing regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.91(b)(1)(i); 40 CFR 80.93(a) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7521(1); 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 08/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4604

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Christine Brunner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AAHEBTC

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4287 

E-Mail: Brunner.Christine@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Patrice Simms Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-5593 

E-Mail: Simms.Patrice@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK26

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances: N-Propyl Bromide

Abstract: This rule would make a determination as to whether n-propylbromide (nPB) is an acceptable substitute for Class I

and Class II ozone-depleting substances used in aerosol solvent and adhesives end uses. If found acceptable, this would

provide industry with another alternative to solvents with higher ozone depletion potential. An acceptability determination could

include specific conditions on the use of nPB as a solvent, such as limiting the specific applications in which it may be used to

those with low emissions and requiring exposure limits that would be sufficient to mitigate risk and that are consistent with

industry practices. Any conditions would be for the purpose of ensuring that nPB is used in a manner that is as safe and

environmentally protective as other available substitutes. OSHA does not currently regulate nPB. If we determine that nPB

cannot be used safely in a specific end use, as compared with other substitutes available for that end use, we would find it

unaccceptable.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

146
Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 1 06/03/2003 68 FR 33283 

NPRM 1 Comment Period End 08/04/2003 

NPRM Correction 10/02/2003 68 FR 56809 

NPRM 2–Adhesives 05/30/2007 72 FR 30168 

NPRM 2–Adhesives Comment Period End 07/30/2007 

Final Action 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4599; EPA publication information: NPRM1 - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2003/June/Day-03/a13254.htm; Split from RIN 2060-AJ58. The previous ANPRM was under SAN No. 3525; EPA Docket

information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0064.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/index.html

Sectors Affected: 334; 332; 337; 333; 331; 336; 32615

Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9163 

FAX: 202 343-2338

E-Mail: Sheppard.Margaret@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Melissa Fiffer Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9464 

FAX: 202 343-2342

E-Mail: fiffer.melissa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK54

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: General Provisions; Amendments for Pollution Prevention Alternative Compliance Requirements

Abstract: These amendments to the part 63 General Provisions would allow facilities that are subject to maximum achievable

control technology (MACT) to discontinue those requirements if, through pollution prevention measures, they achieve and can

demonstrate continued hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emission reductions equivalent to or better than the MACT level of control.

The amendments would also allow a source to avoid MACT by completely eliminating HAP emissions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.2; 40 CFR 63.17; 40 CFR 63.18 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/15/2003 68 FR 26249 

NPRM Comment Period End 07/14/2003 

Final Action 11/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4719; EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2003/May/Day-15/a12180.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0044.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

147
Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Rick Colyer Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D205-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5262 

E-Mail: colyer.rick@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D205-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5060 

FAX: 919 541-5600

E-Mail: conner.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK69

 View Related Documents

Title: Anti-Dumping Baseline Recalculation for Downstream Oxygenate Addition

Abstract: This rule would allow a refiner who added oxygenate after sampling and just before shipment to exclude that

oxygenate from its anti-dumping baseline determination. This exclusion of oxygenate is already allowed for a refinery's gasoline

to which oxygenate was added outside of the refinery gate. This rule will have limited application, and could provide relief to

small refiners.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 09/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4706

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Christine Brunner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AAHEBTC

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4287 

E-Mail: Brunner.Christine@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Patrice Simms Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-5593 

E-Mail: Simms.Patrice@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM44

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

148
 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional

Boilers

Abstract: The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA develop standards for toxic air pollutants, also known as hazardous air

pollutants or air toxics for certain categories of sources. These pollutants are known or suspected to cause cancer and other

serious health and environmental effects. This regulatory action will develop emission standards for boilers located at area

sources. An area source facility emits or has the potential to emit less than 10 tons per year (tpy) of any single air toxic or less

than 25 tpy of any combination of air toxics. Boilers burn coal and other substances such as oil or biomass (e.g., wood) to

produce steam or hot water, which is then used for energy or heat. Industrial boilers are used in manufacturing, processing,

mining, refining, or any other industry. Commercial and institutional boilers are used in commercial establishments, medical

centers, educational facilities and municipal buildings. The majority of area source boilers covered by this proposed rule are

located at commercial and institutional facilities and are generally owned or operated by small entities. EPA estimates that there

are approximately 183,000 existing area source boilers at 91,000 facilities in the United States and that approximately 6,800

new area source boilers will be installed over the next 3 years. The rule will cover boilers located at area source facilities that

burn coal, oil, biomass, or secondary "non-waste" materials. Natural gas-fired area source boilers are not part of the categories

to be regulated. The rule will reduce emissions of a number of toxic air pollutants including mercury, metals, and organic air

toxics. The standards for area sources must be technology-based. Standards for area sources can be based on either generally

available control technology (GACT), or maximum achievable control technology (MACT). To determine GACT, we look at

methods, practices and techniques that are commercially available and appropriate for use by the sources in the category. We

consider the economic impacts on sources in the category and the technical capabilities of the firms to operate and maintain the

emissions control systems. MACT can be based on the emissions reductions achievable through application of measures,

processes, methods, systems, or techniques, but must at least meet minimum control levels as defined in the Clean Air Act.

Economic impacts cannot be considered when determining those minimum control levels.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: State, Local, Or Tribal Governments;

Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 60-day extension granted on July 30, 2009. Additional 2-week extension

was subsequently granted, and the signature date was April 29, 2010. 05/07/2010 

Other Judicial 30-day extension granted from December 16, 2010. 01/16/2011 

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Section 112(c)(3) of the CAA requires EPA to develop rules to reduce specific air toxics emissions (30

urban toxic pollutants) that have been identified as posing the greatest threat to public health in the largest number of urban

areas as a result of emissions from certain categories of area sources. Industrial boilers and institutional/commercial boilers are

listed as two of the area source categories for regulation. In addition, both industrial boilers and commercial/institutional boilers

are on the list of CAA 112(c)(6) source categories which requires that those categories be subject to MACT regulation for

specific air toxics. These two categories were included on the list because of emissions of mercury and polycyclic organic

matter (POM).

Legal Basis: Clean Air Act, section 112.

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: EPA estimates the total nationwide capital cost for the rulemaking for existing and new boilers, as

proposed, to be approximately $2.5 billion, with an annualized cost of 1 billion. The annual cost includes control device

operation and maintenance and annual boiler tuneups, as well as monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, and performance testing.

EPA estimates that the proposal would reduce nationwide emissions from existing and new area source boilers by

approximately 1,500 tons per year (tpy) of total air toxics, 1,500 pounds per year of mercury, 250 tpy of non-mercury metals, 9

tpy of POM, and 7,600 tpy of PM. These emissions reductions will lead to significant annual health benefits. In 2013, this rule

will protect public health by avoiding: 110 to 300 premature deaths, 81 cases of chronic bronchitis, 190 nonfatal heart attacks,

169 hospital and emergency room visits, 190 cases of acute bronchitis, 16,000 days when people miss work, 2,100 cases of

aggravated asthma, and 95,000 acute respiratory symptoms. The monetized benefits of this proposed regulatory action are

estimated to range from $1 billion to $2.4 billion and $900 million to $2.2 billion, at 3 percent and 7 percent discount rates,

respectively.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

149
Action Date FR Cite

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 06/09/2010 75 FR 32682 

NPRM 06/04/2010 75 FR 31895 

NPRM Comment Period End 07/19/2010 

NPRM Comment Period Extended To 08/03/2010 

Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480afbb98; Related to RIN 2060-AQ25.; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business;

Governmental Jurisdictions; Organizations

Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Federalism: Yes

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 611; 62; 44-45; 321

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AQ25

Agency Contact: Mary Johnson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5025 

E-Mail: johnson.mary@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robert J Wayland Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C439-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1045 

E-Mail: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM54

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes in the Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Sector Under the

Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program

Abstract: Under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program, EPA evaluates alternatives to ozone-depleting

substances to ensure that they do not increase overall risks to human health and the environment. If finalized as proposed, this

rule would expand the list of acceptable substitutes (subject to use conditions) for use in the motor vehicle air conditioning

(MVAC) sector. EPA has already issued a final rule for the other substitute addressed in this proposal, R-152a. This final action

pertains to R-744.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.180 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671k

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/21/2006 71 FR 55140 

NPRM Comment Period End 10/23/2006 

Final Rule 06/12/2008 73 FR 33304 

Notice of Data Availability 09/17/2009 74 FR 47774 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4918; EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2006/September/Day-21/a7967.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-OAR-2004-0488.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

150
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/refrigerants/lists/mvacs.html

Agency Contact: Yaidi Cancel Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9512 

FAX: 202 343-2338

E-Mail: cancel.yaidi@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9163 

FAX: 202 343-2338

E-Mail: Sheppard.Margaret@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN01

 View Related Documents

Title: Component Durability Procedures for New Light Duty Vehicles, Light Duty Trucks & Heavy Duty Vehicles

Abstract: On October 22, 2002 the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated durability

provisions that automotive manufacturers used to demonstrate that the emissions of their vehicles would comply with emission

standards for the useful lives of those vehicles. The Court also required EPA to issue new regulations. This action fulfills the

mandate. The new durability regulations will include options that a manufacturer may choose from to age pre-production

vehicles to determine the rate of emission deterioration over the vehicle's useful life. The options will include a prescribed fixed

driving cycle and a prescribed bench aging cycle that are used to age prototype vehicles or emission control components to the

equivalent of the useful life period of the vehicle in a manner that replicates the aging that the vehicle or components would see

in actual use. This rule does not change the federal emission standards or the test procedures used to quantify emissions.

Although there is no court-ordered deadline, this is a court-ordered action.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7521

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Supplemental 2 NPRM 01/17/2006 71 FR 2843 

Final Action 08/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Supplemental 2 NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2006/January/Day-17/a073.htm; Split from RIN 2060-AK76; EPA Docket information: OAR-2002-0079

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3361

Agency Contact: David Good Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AAPTIG

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

151
Phone: 734 214-4450 

E-Mail: Good.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO12

 View Related Documents

Title: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units; Response to Remand of New Source Performance Standards

and Emission Guidelines

Abstract: This action will respond to the remand of the Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) New

Source Performance Standards and Emission Guidelines under section 129 of the Clean Air Act. Among other things, we will

respond to the Court's 2003 remand of the CISWI rule and the Court's June 2007 vacatur of the CISWI Definitions Rule, and

examine and revise, as appropriate, the methodology for developing the MACT floors and emission limits.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 62 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 75 FR 31938 Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0119-0001 04/29/2010 

Other Judicial 12/16/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/04/2010 75 FR 31937 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480afbb7c; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2003-0119

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325; 334; 3254; 321

Agency Contact: Toni Jones Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-0316 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: Jones.Toni@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Charlene Spells Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5255 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: Spells.Charlene@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO25

 View Related Documents

Title: Revision of Hearing—Protector Regulations

Abstract: EPA plans to undertake a revision of its regulation at 40 CFR 211, subpart B, regarding the labeling of products

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

152
that are sold wholly or in part on the basis of their ability to reduce the level of sound entering a person's ears, typically referred

to as “Hearing Protectors.” This action is being taken under the authority of section 8 of the Noise Control Act of 1972, which

authorizes EPA to revise the current compliance test methodologies as necessary, and incorporate new test methods and rating

schemes to address hearing protector technologies that have evolved since initial promulgation of the regulation in 1979.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 211, subpart B (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Noise Control Act of 1972, sec 8

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/05/2009 74 FR 39150 

NPRM; Extension of Public Comment Period 08/21/2009 74 FR 42223 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2009/August/Day05/a18003.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0024

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Ken Feith Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6103

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1679 

FAX: 202 564-1677

E-Mail: Feith.Ken@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Catrice Jefferson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6103

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1668 

FAX: 202 564-1677

E-Mail: Jefferson.Catrice@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO31

 View Related Documents

Title: Amendment of Definitions for National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Pollutants for Radionuclides, Subparts H

and I

Abstract: Subparts H and I of 40 part 61 establish standards under the Clean Air Act for emissions of radionuclides other

than radon from Department of Energy (DOE) and other non-DOE federal facilities. The current definition of "effective dose

equivalent" refers to a method of calculation in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication no. 26.

Removing this reference will prevent confusion if EPA incorporates newer ICRP methods for calculating effective dose

equivalent in its compliance models.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 61.90(a); 40 CFR 61.101(a) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 04/00/2011 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

153
Additional Information: SAN No. 5114

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Dan Schultheisz Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6608J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9349 

FAX: 202 343-2304

E-Mail: schultheisz.daniel@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO51

 View Related Documents

Title: Addition of Method 208, Protocol for the Source Testing, Analysis, and Reporting of VOC Emissions From Hot Mix

Asphalt Plant Dryers

Abstract: Method 208 is a protocol for collecting, analyzing, and reporting of volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions

from asphalt paving production operations. It will produce more accurate measurement of the mass of VOC emissions from

such operations than any other current method for measuring VOC. The method will allow the EPA to make a more accurate

assessment of whether asphalt paving plants are major sources under the Federal programs for New Source Review and

Prevention of Significant Deterioration. EPA is promulgating these methods to make them more widely available and acceptable

for use by asphalt paving producers in meeting various environmental regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51, app M (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et sec

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0622

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32412

Agency Contact: Gary McAlister Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1062 

FAX: 919 541-1039

E-Mail: Mcalister.Gary@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Candace Sorrell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1064 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: sorrell.candace@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

154
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO53

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Appendix A—Test Methods; Amendments to Method 301

Abstract: This action amends EPA's Method 301: Field Validation of Pollutant Measurement Methods from Various Waste

Media. Method 301 can be found in appendix A of 40 CFR, part 63 (Test Methods). Method 301 was promulgated with 40 CFR,

part 63, subpart D (Regulations Governing Compliance Extensions for Early Reductions of Hazardous Air Pollutants)(58 FR

27338, June 13, 1991) pursuant to section 112 of the Clean Air Act (as amended in 1990). This action finalizes amendments to

Method 301 based on comments received on proposed changes to the Method published in the Federal Register on December

22, 2004 (69 FR 76642) and amends errors identified in the proposed amendments to the Method.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 app A (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/22/2004 69 FR 76642 

Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2004/December/Day22/a27985.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0080

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 22

Agency Contact: Gary McAlister Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1062 

FAX: 919 541-1039

E-Mail: Mcalister.Gary@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robin Segall Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

EW143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-0893 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: Segall.Robin@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO58

 View Related Documents

Title: Methods for Measurement of Filterable PM10 and PM2.5 and Measurement of Condensable Particulate Matter

Emissions From Stationary Sources

Abstract: This action adds new procedures to two methods required in State Implementation Plans to measure fine PM or

PM 2.5 with condensable emissions. Method 201a is amended to add procedures and equipment specifications for use of a 2.5

micron size cut cyclone which may be used in conjunction with the current 10 micron size cut cyclone if measuring both PM10

and PM2.5 or may be used alone if only PM2.5 is to be measured. Method 202 is amended to add procedures and equipment

specifications to be followed when the measurement of fine PM which includes condensable emissions is required. These

amendments improve the accuracy and precision of the current version of Method 202.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

155
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 app M (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act, 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/25/2009 74 FR 12969 

Final Action 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-6178.pdf; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-QAR-2008-0348

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Candace Sorrell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1064 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: sorrell.candace@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-7774 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: Oldham.Conniesue@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO91

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks; Group I Polymers and Resins; Marine Tank Vessel

Loading Operations; Pharmaceuticals Production; Printing and Publishing; and Steel Picklin

Abstract: This action proposes how EPA will address the residual risk and technology reviews conducted for two national

emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) and supplements an October 2008 proposal addressing the residual

risk and technology reviews for four NESHAP. The six NESHAP include 16 source categories. This action also proposes to

modify the existing emissions standards for eight source categories in three of the six NESHAP to address certain emission

sources not currently regulated under these standards. It also proposes for all six NESHAP to address provisions related to

emissions during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction. Finally, this action proposes changes to two of the six NESHAP

to correct editorial errors, make clarifications, or address issues with implementation or determining compliance. We have

settlement agreement deadlines for proposed and final rules of September 14, 2010 and June 30, 2011, respectively.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 30 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/10/2008 73 FR 60432 

NPRM Correction 10/24/2008 73 FR 63420 

NPRM & Supplemental NPRM 10/21/2010 75 FR 65068 

Final Action 04/00/2011 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

156
Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AN85; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0008

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3254; 32311; 4883; 325212

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AN85

Agency Contact: Mary Kissell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4516 

FAX: 919 685-3219

E-Mail: Kissell.Mary@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO96

 View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the 1997 8-Hr Ozone NAAQS: Classification of Subpart 1 Areas and Revision to Anti-Backsliding

Provisions; Deletion of Obsolete 1-Hr Ozone Standard Provisions.

Abstract: This rulemaking action would revise the rule for implementation of the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality

standard (NAAQS) to address partial vacatur by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The

rulemaking would remove the portions of the regulatory text vacated by the Court, specifically: (1) the provision that places some

8-hour ozone nonattainment areas under title I, part D, subpart 1 of the CAA; (2) remove the exemption from anti-backsliding for

the following three obligations under the now-revoked 1-hour ozone NAAQS: - New source review; - CAA section 185 penalty

fees for severe and extreme areas that fail to attain the 1-hour standard by their attainment date; and - Contingency measures

for failure to attain the 1-hour standard or make reasonable progress toward attainment. The rule would also address: (1) the

classification system for nonattainment areas that the implementation rule originally covered under Clean Air Act (CAA) title I,

part D, subpart 1; and (2) contingency measures that apply as anti-backsliding measures under the now-revoked 1-hour

standard. The rule would also remove an obsolete provision in the 1-hour ozone standard itself (40 CFR 50.9(c)).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 50; 40 CFR 81 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7511 to 7511f; 42 USC 7601(a)(1)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/16/2009 74 FR 2936 

NPRM Comment Period End Date 02/17/2009 

Final Action 03/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064808228f1; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2007-0956

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

157
Agency Contact: Lynn Dail Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5550 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: dail.lynn@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Kimber Scavo Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3354 

FAX: 919 541-4028

E-Mail: scavo.kimber@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP08

 View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Test Method for Determining Stack Gas Velocity Taking Into Account Velocity Decay Near the Stack Walls

Abstract: This test method enables the representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow from

stationary sources. When the method was originally developed, it addressed only sources where the flow measurements were

made in locations with circular cross-sections within an exhaust stack. This technical update to the test method will address flow

measurement locations with both circular and rectangular cross-sections. The revisions also include changes that increase the

accuracy of the method and simplify its application. The primary users of the method will be owners and operators of utility units

subject to the Acid Rain Program under title IV of the Clean Air Act and certain large electric generating units and large nonelectric generating units that are subject to the nitrogen oxides (NOX) state implementation plan (SIP) call under Title I of the

Clean Air Act. These sources use volumetric stack flow rate monitors in order to measure sulfur dioxide (SO2) and NOX mass

emissions and heat inputs emissions and must conduct periodic relative accuracy test assessments (RATAs) of the flow rate

monitors at these units.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Title I

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/25/2009 74 FR 42819 

Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2009/August/Day25/a20395.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0697

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 221112

Agency Contact: Jason Dewees Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-9724 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: Dewees.Jason@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

158
Phone: 919 541-7774 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: Oldham.Conniesue@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP11

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: New Substitute in the Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Sector Under the Significant

New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program

Abstract: In this action, the Agency proposed to list the refrigerant HFO-1234yf as an acceptable substitute in motor vehicle

air conditioning (MVAC) systems, and outlines the conditions necessary for its safe use. This refrigerant has very low global

warming potential. Current MVAC refrigerants are highly potent greenhouse gases.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82, subpart G (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671k

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/19/2009 74 FR 53445 

NPRM Reopening Public Comment Period 12/28/2009 74 FR 68558 

NPRM Reopening of Public Comment Period 02/09/2010 75 FR 6338 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a44c7a; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2008-0664

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/refrigerants/lists/mvacs.html

Sectors Affected: 336391

Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9163 

FAX: 202 343-2338

E-Mail: Sheppard.Margaret@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Yaidi Cancel Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9512 

FAX: 202 343-2338

E-Mail: cancel.yaidi@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP14

 View Related Documents

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

159
Title: Waste Energy Recovery Registry

Abstract: Title IV of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 directs EPA to establish a "recoverable waste energy

inventory program" in cooperation with the Department of Energy and state energy offices. This inventory program is composed

of a Survey of major industrial and large commercial combustion sources, and a Registry of Recoverable Waste Energy

Sources. On July 23, 2009, EPA issued a proposed rule that included the criteria for including sources or sites in a Registry of

Recoverable Waste Energy Sources, and the Survey processes by which EPA will collect data and populate the Registry.

Under this action, EPA will publish a rule establishing criteria for including sites in the Registry of Recoverable Waste Energy

Sources.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1200 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6342

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 says that EPA

must publish a rule 270 days from its enactment 09/19/2008 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/23/2009 74 FR 36430 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064809f8fac; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2008-0201

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Susan Wickwire Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6202J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9155 

FAX: 202 343-2208

E-Mail: wickwire.susan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP15

 View Related Documents

Title: Ambient Ozone Monitoring Regulations: Revisions to Network Design Requirements

Abstract: Ozone monitoring requirements were revised in October 2006 during a comprehensive revision of ambient

monitoring requirements contained in 40 CFR parts 50, 53, and 58. These changes included revised minimum monitoring

requirements for ozone monitors in urban areas as well as changes to the length of the required monitoring season. As stated in

the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) final rule published on March 27, 2008 (73 FR 16436), EPA

believes that certain changes are needed in the ozone minimum monitoring requirements to account for the newly revised levels

of the NAAQS (primary and secondary NAAQS levels for ozone were revised from an eight-hour level of 0.08 ppm to an eighthour level of 0.075 ppm). In this rulemaking, EPA will propose: (1) modest changes to minimum monitoring requirements in

urban areas, (2) minimal monitoring requirements in rural areas, and (3) incremental adjustments to the length of the ozone

monitoring season where indicated by statistical analysis. These proposed actions have been developed in response to

comments that were received from some States, national monitoring associations, and environmental groups during the Ozone

NAAQS proposal that was published on July 11, 2007 (72 FR 37818). No changes will be proposed in ozone measurement

methodology, quality assurance requirements, or probe siting requirements. Therefore, the implementation of any proposed

changes should be routine for affected monitoring agencies.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

160
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 58 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7403; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7601(a); 42 USC 7611; 42 USC 7619

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/16/2009 74 FR 34525 

Final Action 03/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2009/July/Day16/a16802.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0338

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Lewis Weinstock Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C304-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3661 

FAX: 919 541-1903

E-Mail: Weinstock.Lewis@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lula Melton Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C304-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2910 

FAX: 919 541-1903

E-Mail: melton.lula@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP16

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Gasoline Distribution; Amendments—Area Source Standard

Abstract: On January 10, 2008, EPA issued final national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for gasoline

distribution area source bulk terminals, bulk plants, pipeline facilities, and gasoline dispensing facilities. Subsequently, we

received two petitions for reconsideration from industry to clarify some applicability and implementation provisions of the final

rule. On 12/15/09, we proposed amendments to address the issues raised by the petitioners as well as compliance-related

questions raised by other stakeholders. This action is to consider public comments on the proposed amendments, and develop

and issue final amendments.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/15/2009 74 FR 66470 

Final Action 03/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-29560.pdf; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0406

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

161
Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Steve Shedd Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5397 

FAX: 919 685-3195

E-Mail: Shedd.Steve@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP23

 View Related Documents

Title: Restructuring of the Stationary Source Audit Program

Abstract: 40 CFR parts 51, 60, 61, and 63 contain EPA's air toxics emissions standards (NESHAPS) and emission

standards for new stationary sources (NSPS). 40 CFR 63.7(c)(2)(ii) requires an external Quality Assurance (QA) program that at

a minimum includes an application of plans for a test method performance audit during the performance test. 40 CFR part 60

Appendices also contain similar requirements within individual test methods. Currently EPA provides these audit samples free of

charge because there were no commercial sources. Because of growth in the laboratory calibration standards, there are now

commercial sources available to provide these audit samples. Restructuring this program will allow commercial suppliers to

replace EPA as the source of audit samples. As a result of restructuring, there will be both greater availability and new kinds of

audit samples which should yield increased usage of the audit sample program and, in turn, overall better quality test data.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51, 60, 61, and 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 23 USC 101; 42 USC 7401 to 7671q; 42 USC 7410, 7414, 7421, 7470 to 7479, 7491, 7492, 7601, and

7602; 42 USC 7401, 7412, 7413, 7414, 7416, 7601, and 7602; 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/16/2009 74 FR 28451 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2009/June/Day16/a14023.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0531

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Candace Sorrell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1064 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: sorrell.candace@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Gary McAlister Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

162
Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1062 

FAX: 919 541-1039

E-Mail: Mcalister.Gary@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP30

 View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard: NSR Anti-Backsliding

Abstract: This action proposes to revise the rule for implementing the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality

standard (NAAQS). The rule will address how nonattainment major new source review (NSR) requirements apply under the antibacksliding provisions of the implementation rule in response to a partial vacatur by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of

Columbia Circuit.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7511 to 7511f; 42 USC 7601(a)(1)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/24/2010 75 FR 51960 

Final Action 05/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b38bb4; Split from RIN 2060-AO96; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0462

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr

Agency Contact: David Painter Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5515 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: painter.david@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP37

 View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality Designations and Classifications for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Abstract: This action will establish the air quality designations for all areas of the United States under the revised 2008

ozone NAAQS. Designations of attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable are based upon air quality monitoring data and

other relevant information pertaining to the air quality in the affected area, including whether an area contributes to a violation

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

163
of the standard in a nearby area. The schedule and process for designations is contained in CAA section 107. Under the

schedule, States and Tribes are to submit their designation recommendations no later than one year from promulgation of the

revised NAAQS. EPA is required to notify States and Tribes of any modifications that EPA intends to make to their

recommendations no later than 120 days prior to promulgation of the designations. EPA must make the designations no later

than 2 years from the March 12, 2008 promulgation of the revised NAAQS. However, EPA may extend that date by up to one

year if EPA has insufficient information. On January 6, 2010, EPA issued a proposal to reconsider the 2008 ozone NAAQS and

instead set more protective NAAQS. If EPA promulgates new NAAQS as a result of the reconsideration, the requirement to

designate areas for the replaced 2008 NAAQS would no longer apply. Because of the uncertainty created by the reconsideration

of the 2008 ozone NAAQS, on January 6, 2010, EPA announced it extended the designations deadline by one year, until March

12, 2011.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: sec 107(d); sec 172(a); sec 181(a)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory The CAA requires EPA to complete designations in 2 years from

promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS. 03/12/2011 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 03/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Carla Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3347 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2940 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: Jones.Rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP48

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Gold Mine Ore Processing

Abstract: EPA is developing a national emissions standard for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for gold mine ore

processing facilities under section 112 of the Clean Air Act. This action is being developed to help fulfill a mandate under section

112(c)(6) of the Clean Air Act, which requires EPA to list categories and subcategories of sources assuring that sources

accounting for not less than 90 per centum of the aggregate emissions of mercury are subject to standards under subsection

112(d)(2) or 112(d)(4) of the Clean Air Act. This action will help protect human health and the environment by proposing controls

for mercury emissions from this source category.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

164
Legal Authority: CAA sec 112(c)(6)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 04/15/2010 

Other Statutory 06/28/2010 

Other Statutory Last day to submit public comments. Public comment period ended. 12/16/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/28/2010 75 FR 22469 

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 05/20/2010 75 FR 28227 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#docketDetail?R=EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0239

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Chuck French Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-7912 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: french.chuck@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2837 

FAX: 919 541-4991

E-Mail: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP50

 View Related Documents

Title: Transport Rule (CAIR Replacement Rule)

Abstract: On May 12, 2005, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated the Clean Air Interstate Rule,

commonly known as CAIR (70 FR 25162). The CAIR used a cap and trade approach to reduce sulfur dioxide (SO2) and

nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions. On July 11, 2008, the D.C. Circuit issued an opinion finding parts of the CAIR unlawful and

vacating the rule. On December 23, the D.C. Circuit issued a decision on the petitions for rehearing of the July 11 decision. The

court granted EPA's petition for rehearing to the extent that it remanded the cases without vacatur of the CAIR. This ruling

means that the CAIR remains in place temporarily but that EPA is obligated to promulgate another rule under Clean Air Act

section 110(a)(2)(D) consistent with the court's July 11 opinion. This action would fulfill our obligation to develop a rule

consistent with the July 11, 2008, and December 23, 2008, D.C. Court decisions.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51, 52, 72, 78, 97 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Clean Air Transport Rule is necessary to help States address interstate transport of pollutants

from upwind States to downwind nonattainment areas. Specifically, the rule is needed to respond to the remand of the Clean Air

Interstate Rule by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

165
Legal Basis: The Clean Air Transport Rule is needed to help States address the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of

the Clean Air Act. This section requires States to prohibit emissions that contribute significantly to downwind nonattainment with

the national ambient air quality standards or which interfere with maintaining the standards in those downwind States.

Alternatives: To be determined.

Costs and Benefits: The proposed rule would yield more than $120 to $290 billion in annual benefits in 2014. This far

outweighs the estimated annual costs of $2.8 billion for that year. Both the annual benefits and costs are in 2006 dollars. The

emission reductions from this proposed rule would lead to significant annual health benefits. In 2014, this rule would protect

public health by avoiding: 14,000 to 36,000 premature deaths, 21,000 cases of acute bronchitis, 23,000 nonfatal heart attacks,

26,000 hospital and emergency room visits, 1.9 million days when people miss work or school, 240,000 cases of aggravated

asthma, and 440,000 upper and lower respiratory symptoms. Air quality improvements would lead to increased visibility in

national and State parks, and increased protection for sensitive ecosystems including, Adirondack and Appalachian lakes,

coastal waters and estuaries, and sugar maple forests.

Risks: To be determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/02/2010 75 FR 45210 

NODA 09/01/2010 75 FR 53613 

NPRM Correcting Amendments 09/14/2010 75 FR 55711 

NPRM Comment Period End 10/01/2010 

Final Action 07/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b25be1; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2009-0491

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental

Jurisdictions Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Yes

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/airtransport

Sectors Affected: 221112

Agency Contact: Gabrielle Stevens Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6204J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9252 

FAX: 202 343-2359

E-Mail: stevens.gabrielle@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Meg Victor Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6204J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9193 

E-Mail: Victor.Meg@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP54

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances-Hydrocarbon Refrigerants

Abstract: This action proposed to list a number of hydrocarbon refrigerants as substitutes to ozone depleting substances for

certain household and commercial uses under EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program. The SNAP Program

evaluates alternatives to ozone-depleting substances to ensure that they do not increase overall risks to human health and the

environment and lists these substitutes as acceptable, acceptable subject to use conditions, acceptable with narrowed use limits,

or unacceptable. This action proposed to find a number of hydrocarbons acceptable subject to use conditions, including

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

166
enforceable use conditions to ensure the safe use of hydrocarbons as refrigerants. This rule is anticipated to give industry more

options with less overall environmental and health impact than current refrigerants.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/10/2010 75 FR 25799 

Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480aea2df; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2009-0286

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/index.html

Sectors Affected: 333415; 335222

Agency Contact: Monica Shimamura Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9337 

E-Mail: Shimamura.Monica@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9163 

FAX: 202 343-2338

E-Mail: Sheppard.Margaret@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP57

 View Related Documents

Title: Transportation Conformity Rule Restructuring Amendments

Abstract: The transportation conformity rule ensures that transportation planning is consistent with a State's plan for

achieving air quality standards. These amendments will update the rule to apply existing conformity requirements to future

NAAQS such that the need for future rulemakings merely to address conformity for a new or revised NAAQS will be minimized.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 and 93 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA sec 176(c)(42 USC 7506(c)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 

New Ozone areas need rule by 6/2010 to make 1st conformity

determination by CAA deadline, 1 yr from effective date of designations. 06/11/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

167
NPRM Comment Period Extended 08/13/2010 75 FR 49435 

Final Action 08/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-19928.pdf; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0128

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 92

Agency Contact: Patty Klavon Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AASMCG

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4476 

E-Mail: klavon.patty@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Laura Berry Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AASMCG

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4858 

E-Mail: Berry.Laura@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP64

 View Related Documents

Title: Clean Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Engine Conversions

Abstract: New regulations affecting the conversion of automobiles from the original fuel on which they were designed to

operate to an alternative fuel are necessary because at this time vehicle fuel converters are only able to convert a vehicle's fuel

operation if the conversion has been EPA certified. The certification process is suitable for the conversions of newer vehicles.

However, converters seeking to legally convert an older vehicle, for which there are now tax and other monetary incentives,

need a process more suitable for older vehicles. This rule clarifies the certification procedure for new vehicle conversions as well

as creates an option for used vehicles to ensure continued air quality.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 85; 40 CFR 86 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA sec 203(a)(1); CAA sec 202 and 206; 40 CFR 86.1848–01; CAA sec 202

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/26/2010 75 FR 29606 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://69.175.53.6/register/2010/may/26/2010-11149.pdf; EPA

Docket information: EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0299

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 336399; 336312

Agency Contact: Amy Bunker Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AAIO

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4160 

E-Mail: Bunker.Amy@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

168
Agency Contact: Laura Baker Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AAPTIG

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4592 

E-Mail: Baker.Laura@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP67

 View Related Documents

Title: Compression Ignition Engine NSPS—Amendments

Abstract: This action will amend the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for stationary compression ignition internal

combustion engines. These amendments are the result of a settlement agreement with the American Petroleum Institute. The

amendments to the rule include limiting the operation and maintenance (O&M) requirements to emission-related O&M and

allowing certified engine owners/operators to operate/maintain their engines according to their own O&M practices if they

conduct performance testing to demonstrate compliance. The amendments also clarify the requirements for temporary

replacement engines. In addition, this action amends the NSPS to implement more stringent emission standards for engines

with a displacement above 10 liters/cylinder, consistent with recent revisions to standards for similar mobile source engines. This

action revises the requirements for engines in rural portions of Alaska. The amendments also correct minor errors in the NSPS.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial settlement agreement with API 05/22/2010 

Other Judicial settlement agreement with API 05/22/2011 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/08/2010 75 FR 32611 

Final Action; Extension of Public Comment Period 08/06/2010 75 FR 47520 

Final Action 06/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?

R=0900006480afe2c6http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480afe2c6; EPA Docket

information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0295

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Melanie King Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2469 

E-Mail: king.melanie@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robert J Wayland Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C439-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1045 

E-Mail: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

169
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP75

 View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the New Source Review Program for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers--Repeal of

Grandfathering Provision and End Early the PM10 Surrogate Policy

Abstract: This final will (1) repeal the grandfathering provision for particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5)

contained in the federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) regulations at 40 CFR 52.21, and (2) end the use of EPA’s

PM10 Surrogate Policy as an interim means of satisfying the PM2.5 requirements in state PSD programs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7501 et seq; 42 USC 7601(a)(1)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/11/2010 75 FR 6827 

NPRM Comment Period End 03/29/2010 

Final Action 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4752.4; EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a91043; Split from RIN 2060-AN86. Split

from RIN 2060-AK74; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0062.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr/

Agency Contact: Dan DeRoeck Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5593 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: deroeck.dan@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP77

 View Related Documents

Title: Revision to Pb Ambient Air Monitoring Requirements

Abstract: On November 12, 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised the National Ambient Air Quality

Standards (NAAQS) for lead (Pb) and associated monitoring requirements. The finalized monitoring requirements require State

and local monitoring agencies to conduct Pb monitoring near Pb sources emitting 1.0 tons per year (tpy) or more and in large

urban areas referred to as Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSA) with a population of 500,000 people or more. In January 2009,

EPA received a petition from the Missouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation, Natural Resources Defense Council, the

Coalition to End Childhood Poisoning, and Physicians for Social Responsibility requesting EPA reconsider the 1.0 tpy emission

threshold. EPA granted the petition to reconsider on July 22, 2009. This action represents the results of the EPA’s

reconsideration of the Pb monitoring requirements. A proposed revision was published on December 30, 2009, in which the

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

170
EPA proposed to lower the emission threshold to 0.50 tpy, and to require Pb monitoring at the approximately 80 NCore sites

instead of monitoring Pb in CBSA's with a population greater than 500,000. The EPA also requested comments on an emission

threshold greater than 0.50 tpy, alternative approaches for monitoring Pb near airports, and on staggering the monitoring

deployment over two years.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 58 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7403, 7410, 7601(a), 7611, and 7619

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This action is in response to a petition to reconsider that the Agency received and granted on the Pb

monitoring requirements contained in the revision to the Pb NAAQS (73 FR 66964).

Legal Basis: Clean Air Act title I

Alternatives: To be determined.

Costs and Benefits: To be determined.

Risks: To be determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/30/2009 74 FR 69050 

NPRM Comment Period End 02/16/2010 

Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a74184; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2006-0735

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/air/lead

Sectors Affected: 9241

Agency Contact: Kevin Cavender Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C304-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2364 

FAX: 919 541-1903

E-Mail: Cavender.Kevin@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lewis Weinstock Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C304-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3661 

FAX: 919 541-1903

E-Mail: Weinstock.Lewis@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP80

 View Related Documents

Title: Reconsideration of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review NSR:

Aggregation

Abstract: This action follows RIN 2060-AP49, in which EPA developed and issued a final rule that addressed when a source

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

171
must combine (i.e., “aggregate”) nominally-separate physical and operational changes for the purpose of determining whether

they are a single change and subject to review under the New Source Review (NSR) program. Following promulgation of the

NSR Aggregation final rule on 1/15/09, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) submitted a petition for reconsideration

as provided for in Clean Air Act (CAA) section 307(d)(7)(B). In response to NRDC’s petition, EPA has both announced the

convening of a reconsideration proceeding and administratively stayed the effective date of the rule indefinitely to allow time to

conduct the reconsideration. Under this RIN, we will take comment on a range of legal and policy issues related to the

Aggregation rule and complete any revisions of the rule that become necessary as a result of the reconsideration process.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.165; 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final - Stay Extension Rule - Stay ends 5/18/10. 05/18/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/15/2010 75 FR 19567 

Extension of Comment Period 05/14/2010 75 FR 27191 

Final Action - Delay of Effective Date 05/18/2010 75 FR 27643 

Final Action 07/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ad8130; Split from RIN 2060-AP49. Split

from RIN 2060-AL75; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0064

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Sectors Affected: 325181; 325188; 325998; 336399; 331311; 336111; 325414; 325182; 221121; 221122; 221112; 336312;

33612; 221111; 325413; 32512; 336112; 325411; 336992; 336213; 336211; 33634; 33633; 33635; 22121; 211112; 322122;

221113; 221119; 336322; 322121; 32411; 325412; 48621; 336212

Agency Contact: Dave Svendsgaard Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2380 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Svendsgaard.Dave@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP88

 View Related Documents

Title: Carbon Dioxide Injection and Geologic Sequestration Reporting Rule

Abstract: This rule would require facilities that conduct geologic sequestration or that inject CO2 underground to report GHG

data to EPA annually. This regulation would provide nationally consistent public information quantifying the amount of CO2

geologically sequestered in the United States. In combination with subpart PP of the GHG Reporting Program (suppliers of

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

172
CO2), this regulation would enable EPA to better understand the quantity of CO2 supplied to emissive and potentially nonemissive end-uses and to track the flow of CO2 across the CO2 capture and storage (CCS) system. Finally, this regulation

would enable EPA and others to track growth and efficacy of geologic sequestration (and therefore CCS) as a mitigation

technology over time and to evaluate relevant policy options. This rule would not require control of greenhouse gases, rather it

would require only that sources injecting or sequestering CO2 monitor and report emissions. EPA has designed this rule so that

facilities can comply with the reporting requirements without disrupting or delaying normal operations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 72; 40 CFR 78; 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/12/2010 75 FR 18576 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ad5a76; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2009-0926

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/co2_geosequest.html

Sectors Affected: 211

Agency Contact: Barbora Master Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6207J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9899 

FAX: 202 343-2202

E-Mail: Master.Barbora@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lisa Bacanskas Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6207J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9758 

FAX: 202 343-2202

E-Mail: Bacanskas.Lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP90

 View Related Documents

Title: NSPS/Emission Guidelines (EG) for Sewage Sludge Incinerators

Abstract: Under section 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is required to adopt and implement maximum achievable

control technology (MACT) standards for both new and existing Sewage Sludge Incineration units (SSI). Regulations for Other

Solid Waste Incinerators (OSWI) were promulgated on December 15, 2005. However, at that time, EPA did not issue standards

or guidelines for SSI units and several other incinerator categories. In 2007, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision

vacating EPA's definition of "solid waste incineration unit," holding that "any facility that combusts any commercial or industrial

solid waste material at all" is a commercial or industrial solid waste incineration unit. Based on this decision, in this rulemaking,

EPA is re-evaluating whether SSI units are in fact solid waste incineration units and whether, as such, they must be regulated

under section 129.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: State, Local, Or Tribal Governments

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

173
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60.4760 to 60.4930 and 40 CFR 60.5000 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 5 USC 801

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial 12/16/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/14/2010 75 FR 63260 

NPRM Technical Correction 11/08/2010 75 FR 68296 

NPRM Comment Period End 11/15/2010 

Final Action 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0559

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Amy Hambrick Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-0964 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: Hambrick.Amy@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ketan Patel Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-9736 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: patel.ketan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP98

 View Related Documents

Title: Reconsideration of the 2008 Ozone Primary and Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Abstract: On March 12, 2008, EPA announced the final decision on the ozone national ambient air quality standards

(NAAQS). Soon after that decision was signed on March 27, 2008 (73 FR 16436), the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee

(CASAC) held an unsolicited public meeting and criticized EPA for setting primary and secondary standards that were not

consistent with advice provided by the CASAC during review of the NAAQS. On July 25, 2008, several environmental and

industry petitioners, as well as a number of States, sued EPA on the NAAQS decision, and the Court set a briefing schedule for

the consolidated cases on December 23, 2008. On March 10, 2009, EPA requested that the Court vacate the briefing schedule

and hold the consolidated cases in abeyance for 180 days. This request for extension was made to allow time for appropriate

EPA officials appointed by the new Administration to determine whether the standards established in March 2008 should be

maintained, modified, or otherwise reconsidered. Announcement of reconsideration of the March 2008 NAAQS decision

occurred on September 16, 2009. The NAAQS proposal (including a proposal to stay implementation designations for the March

2008 NAAQS) was signed on January 6, 2010, with the final rule to be signed on or around October 2010. Reconsideration of

the NAAQS will be limited to information and supporting documentation available to EPA and in the docket at the time of the

March 2008 decision.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

174
Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As established in the Clean Air Act, the national ambient air quality standards for ozone are to be

reviewed every 5 years. As outlined in the abstract of this regulatory plan entry, this reconsideration is in response to actions by

the courts regarding the last review in 2008.

Legal Basis: Section 109 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409) directs the Administrator to propose and promulgate

"primary" and "secondary" national ambient air quality standards for pollutants identified under section 108 (the "criteria"

pollutants). The "primary" standards are established for the protection of public health, while "secondary" standards are to

protect against public welfare.

Alternatives: The main alternatives for the Administrator's decision are whether to set different primary and secondary

ozone standards than those set in 2008.

Costs and Benefits: A supplement to the RIA was prepared that presents the costs and benefits associated with the

proposed revised ozone standards. This RIA was made available when the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was published.

Risks: The current national ambient air quality standards for ozone are intended to protect against public health risks

associated with morbidity and/or premature mortality and public welfare risks associated with adverse vegetation and ecosystem

effects. During the course of this review, risk assessments will be conducted to evaluate health and welfare risks associated

with retention or revision of the ozone standards.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/19/2010 75 FR 2938 

NPRM Comment Period End 03/22/2010 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a7f618; Related to RIN 2060-AN24; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AN24

Agency Contact: Susan Stone Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1146 

FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: stone.susan@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5274 

FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP99

 View Related Documents

Title: Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule

Abstract: This regulation would require reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from the petroleum and natural gas industry.

This rule applies to industry segments of the petroleum and natural gas industry which have significant vented and equipment

leak emissions of carbon dioxide and methane e.g., natural gas transmission compression, distribution, etc. The rule would not

require control of greenhouse gases, rather it would require only that sources above certain threshold levels monitor and report

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

175
emissions. This sector was originally proposed in the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule. Subpart W was re-proposed

in April 2010 due to public comment. It is now being finalized.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/12/2010 75 FR 18608 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ad5aa6; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2009-0923

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AO79

Agency Contact: Akachi Imegwu Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6207J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9709 

E-Mail: imegwu.akachi@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Roger Fernandez Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6207J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9386 

FAX: 202 565-2079

E-Mail: Fernandez.Roger@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ00

 View Related Documents

Title: Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule for Additional Sources of Fluorinated GHGs

Abstract: In this action, EPA is finalizing reporting requirements for five source categories: (1) Electronics Manufacturing, (2)

Fluorinated Gas Production, (3) Use of Electrical Transmission and Distribution Equipment, (4) Manufacture or Refurbishment of

Electrical Equipment, and (5) Importers of Pre-charged Equipment and Closed-Cell Foams. The purpose of this rule is to collect

accurate and comprehensive emissions data to inform future climate change policies. In a notice of proposed rulemaking

published in the Federal Register on April 10, 2009, as required by the FY2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act, EPA proposed

reporting requirements for a number of different source categories including Electronics Manufacturing, Use of Electrical

Transmission and Distribution Equipment, and Fluorinated Gas Production. Due to the complexity of comments received, EPA

did not finalize requirements for Electronics Manufacturing, Use of Electrical Transmission and Distribution Equipment, and

Fluorinated Gas Production, and re-proposed reporting requirements for those three source categories in an April 2010 notice of

proposed rulemaking (75 FR 18652). In addition, in that April 2010 proposed rule, EPA also proposed reporting requirements for

Manufacture or Refurbishment of Electrical Equipment and for Importers of Pre-Charged Equipment and Closed-Cell Foam. In

this final action, EPA is finalizing the reporting requirements for all five source categories.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

176
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/12/2010 75 FR 18652 

NODA 05/13/2010 75 FR 26904 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ad5a87; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2009-0927

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AO79

Agency Contact: Deborah Ottinger Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6202J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9149 

E-Mail: Ottinger.Deborah@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Kirsten Cappel Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6207J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9556 

E-Mail: Cappel.Kirsten@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ02

 View Related Documents

Title: Corporate Parent and NAICS Code in the Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting Rule Requirements

Abstract: EPA recently finalized the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Mandatory Reporting Rule (signed September 22, 2009). This

rule requires facilities with direct GHG emissions over 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), suppliers of

petroleum, natural gas, and industrial gases as well as vehicle and engine manufacturers outside the light duty sector to report

to EPA annually. The data collection started on January 1, 2010, and the first reports to EPA are due on March 31, 2011. As

part of that first report, EPA would require through this rulemaking that reporters also include (1) the legal name, physical

address, and percent ownership for all parent companies linked to the reporting facility; (2) their primary and all other applicable

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code(s); and (3) an indication of whether or not any of their reported

emissions are from a cogeneration unit. In developing the final September 2009 rule, EPA received comments that this type of

information would be useful to the public and EPA. Therefore, this rule would require these three data elements in the annual

GHG emissions reports.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/12/2010 75 FR 18455 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

177
Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ad5ada; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2009-0925

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AO79

Agency Contact: Cate Hight Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6207J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9230 

E-Mail: Hight.Cate@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lisa Comer Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1807T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-2206 

E-Mail: Comer.Lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ06

 View Related Documents

Title: Amendments to the Protocol Gas Verification Program, and Minimum Competency Requirements for Air Emission

Testing

Abstract: This rule amends two provisions in 40 CFR part 75 (emission monitoring for cap and trade programs): (1) a

Protocol Gas Verification Program (PGVP) to better ensure the accuracy of calibration gases used by affected sources and

regulatory agencies; and (2) minimum competency requirements for Air Emission Testing Bodies (AETB) also known as stack

test companies, when performing stack testing under 40 CFR part 75. These two provisions were originally published in the FR

as a final rule on January 24, 2008, but EPA was sued on both provisions. The amendments are described below. The old

PGVP provision was alleged to have violated the Miscellaneous Receipts Act by improperly augmenting EPA's appropriation in

arranging for payment of a formerly Agency funded audit program with private funds and a key document was not in the docket.

The amended PGVP provision remedies these averred deficiencies by providing for payment to the National Institute of

Standards and Technology which has statutory authority to receive such funds, and by ensuring that all relevant material will be

placed in the docket. The old AETB provision allegedly placed enforceable competency requirements on affected sources which

did not have total control in implementing those requirements and which further allegedly provided insufficient time for power

plants with in-house stack test teams to comply. The amended AETB provision relies on certain documentation provided at the

time of stack testing as sufficient proof of validity of test data that otherwise meets the requirements of part 75, and extends the

compliance deadline.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 72.2 (Revision); 40 CFR 75.4 (Revision); 40 CFR 75.6 (Revision); 40 CFR 75.21 (Revision); 40 CFR

75.22 (Revision); 40 CFR 75.47 (Revision); 40 CFR 75.53 (Revision); 40 CFR 75.57 (Revision); 40 CFR 75.58 (Revision); 40

CFR 75.59 (Revision); 40 CFR 75.62 (Revision); 40 CFR 75.63 (Revision); 40 CFR 75.64 (Revision); 40 CFR 75 app A

(Revision); 40 CFR 75 app B (Revision); 40 CFR 75 app E (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7601 and 7651, et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/11/2010 75 FR 33392 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

178
http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b00200; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2009-0837

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/emissions/pgvp.html

Sectors Affected: 221112

Agency Contact: John Schakenbach Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6204J

Washington, D.C. , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9158 

E-Mail: Schakenbach.John@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ragan Tate Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

2344A

Washington, D.C. , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-7382 

E-Mail: Tate.Ragan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ08

 View Related Documents

Title: Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits Under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of

Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Finding of Substantial Inadequacy and SIP Call

Abstract: EPA is finalizing actions that may authorize state, local, or tribal air permitting authorities (collectively "states") or

the EPA to issue permits under the CAA New Source Review PSD program for sources of GHGs as early as January 2, 2011,

which is when some of those sources will be required to obtain PSD permits in order to undertake construction or modification

projects. These actions apply to states whose SIP PSD programs fail to apply to GHG sources. For each of these states, EPA,

acting pursuant to the authority of the CAA provisions governing requirements for SIPs, proposed to issue a finding that the

state's PSD SIP is substantially inadequate to comply with the CAA PSD requirements, and EPA is also finalizing to require the

state (through a "SIP call") to revise its SIP as necessary to correct such inadequacies. Such a SIP revision, when approved by

EPA, would authorize the state to issue PSD permits to GHG sources. In a companion notice, EPA proposes a federal

implementation plan ("FIP"), which EPA would finalize if a state fails to make the required SIP submission and which would

authorize EPA to issue the PSD permits to the GHG sources.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/02/2010 75 FR 53892 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b42faf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2010-0107

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Agency Contact: Lisa Sutton Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

179
Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3450 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Sutton.Lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ09

 View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Motor Vehicle Fuel Economy Label

Abstract: EPA is responsible for developing the fuel economy labels that are posted on window stickers of all new light duty

cars and trucks sold in the U.S. and, beginning with the 2011 model year, on all new medium-duty passenger vehicles (a

category that includes large sport-utility vehicles and passenger vans). In 2006, EPA updated how the city and highway fuel

economy values are calculated, to better reflect typical real-world driving patterns and provide more realistic fuel economy

estimates. Since then, increasing market penetration of advanced technology vehicles, in particular plug-in hybrid electric

vehicles and electric vehicles, will require new metrics to effectively convey information to consumers. This action will amend the

way in which fuel economy estimates are calculated and/or displayed. The changes in this action will not impact the Corporate

Average Fuel Economy requirements.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 85, 86, 600; 49 CFR 575 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

(NHTSA) have recently jointly proposed to redesign and add information to the current fuel economy label that is posted on the

window sticker of all new cars and light-duty trucks sold in the U.S. The redesigned label will provide new information to

American consumers about the fuel economy and consumption, fuel costs, and environmental impacts associated with

purchasing new vehicles beginning with model year 2012 cars and trucks. This action will also develop new labels for certain

advanced technology vehicles, which are poised to enter the U.S. market, in particular plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and

electric vehicles. NHTSA and EPA are proposing these changes because the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of

2007 imposes several new labeling requirements, because the labels for conventional vehicles can be improved to help

consumers make more informed vehicle purchase decisions, and because the time is right to develop new labels for advanced

technology vehicles that are being commercialized.

Legal Basis: Both EPA and NHTSA have authority over labeling requirements related to fuel economy and environmental

information under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) and the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA),

respectively. In order to implement that authority in the most coordinated and efficient way, the agencies have jointly proposed

to revise the Fuel Economy label.

Alternatives: The rulemaking proposal includes an alternative label that is being considered in addition to the Agency’s

primary proposal.

Costs and Benefits: The primary costs associated with this proposed rule come from revisions to the fuel economy label

and codifying testing requirements for EVs and PHEVs. This rule is not economically significant under E.O. 12866 or any DOT

or EPA policies and procedures because it does not exceed $100 million or meet other related standards. The primary benefits

associated with this proposed rule come from any improvements in consumer decisionmaking that may lead to reduced vehicle

and fuel costs for them. There may be additional effects on criteria pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions. At this time, EPA

and NHTSA do not believe it is feasible to fully develop a complete benefits analysis of the potential benefits.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

180
Risks: The failure to finalize updated conventional vehicle fuel economy labels and to create new labels for EVs and PHEVs

will result in labels that are unhelpful and potentially misleading for consumers as they seek to select more energy efficient and

environmentally friendly vehicles that meet their needs.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice--Public Meeting 09/28/2010 75 FR 59673 

NPRM 09/23/2010 75 FR 58078 

NPRM Comment Period End 11/22/2010 

Final Action 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0865

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy/regulations.htm

Agency Contact: Lucie Audette Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

NVFEL

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4850 

E-Mail: Audette.Lucie@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Chelsea May Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

NVFEL

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4226 

E-Mail: May.Chelsea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ16

 View Related Documents

Title: 2011 Renewable Fuel Volume Standards as Required by Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA)

Abstract: In response to EISA, EPA finalized the RFS2 program regulations. However, under EISA, EPA is required to

promulgate regulations that specify the annual statutory volume requirements for renewable fuels, including cellulosic biofuel,

biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel that must be used in transportation fuel in each year. In the

case of the cellulosic biofuel standard, EISA specifically requires that the standard be set based on the volume projected to be

available during the following year. If the volumes are lower than those specified under EISA, then EPA may also lower the

advanced biofuel and total renewable fuel standards each year accordingly. This regulatory action, establishes these annual

statutory volume requirements for cellulosic, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and renewable fuels that apply to all

gasoline and diesel produced or imported in year 2011. This regulation, thus, sets the final standards for renewable fuels

required in year 2011. Entities potentially affected by this final rule are those involved with the production, distribution, and sale

of transportation fuels, including gasoline and diesel fuel or renewable fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7545

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM Comment Period Extended 07/20/2010 75 FR 42238 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b1cff3

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

181
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: David Korotney Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C99

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4507 

FAX: 734 14-4018

E-Mail: Korotney.David@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Russ Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6406J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9996 

FAX: 202 343-2800

E-Mail: smith.russ@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ24

 View Related Documents

Title: Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources:

Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators; Amendments

Abstract: On October 6, 2009, EPA promulgated its response to the remand of the new source performance standards and

emissions guidelines for hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Circuit and satisfied the Clean Air Act section 129(a)(5) requirement to conduct a review of the standards every five years. This

action proposes to amend the new source performance standards emissions limits for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur dioxide

(SO2) promulgated for large hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators in order to correct inadvertent drafting errors we made

setting forth those limits, which did not correspond to our description of our standard-setting process.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/14/2010 75 FR 27249 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480aed9ef

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Ketan Patel Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-9736 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: patel.ketan@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Amy Hambrick Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

182
Phone: 919 541-0964 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: Hambrick.Amy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ25

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional

Boilers and Process Heaters

Abstract: Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) outlines the statutory requirements for EPA's stationary source air toxics

program. Section 112 mandates that EPA develop standards for hazardous air pollutants (HAP) for both major and area

sources listed under section 112(c). This regulatory action will finalize emission standards for boilers and process heaters

located at major sources. Section 112(d)(2) requires that emission standards for major sources be based on the maximum

achievable control technology (MACT). Industrial boilers and institutional/commercial boilers are on the list of section 112(c)(6)

source categories. In this rulemaking, EPA will finalize standards for these source categories.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: State, Local, Or Tribal Governments;

Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 60-day extension granted on June 30, 2009. An additional 2 weeks was

subsequently granted. Signature date: April 29, 2010. 04/29/2010 

Other Judicial 30-day extension granted from December 16, 2011. 01/16/2011 

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As a result of the vacatur of the Industrial Boiler MACT, the Agency will develop another rulemaking

under CAA section 112 which will reduce hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from this source category. Recent court

decisions on other CAA section 112 rules will be considered in developing this regulation.

Legal Basis: Clean Air Act, section 112.

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: EPA estimates the total national capital cost for the final rule to be approximately $9.5 billion in the

year 2013, with a total national annual cost of $2.9 billion in the year 2013. The annual cost, which considers fuel savings,

includes control device operation and maintenance as well as monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, and performance testing.

EPA estimates that implementation of the rulemaking, as proposed, would reduce nationwide emissions from major source

boilers and process heaters by: 15,000 pounds per year of mercury, 3,200 tpy of non-mercury metals, 37,000 tpy of HCl,

50,000 tpy of PM, 340,000 tpy of SO2, 722 grams per year of dioxin and 1,800 tpy of volatile organic compounds. These

emissions reductions would lead to the following annual health benefits. In 2013, this rule will protect public health by avoiding

1,900 to 4,800 premature deaths, 1,300 cases of chronic bronchitis, 3,000 nonfatal heart attacks, 3,200 hospital and emergency

room visits, 3,000 cases of acute bronchitis, 250,000 days when people miss work, 33,000 cases of aggravated asthma, and

1,500,000 acute respiratory symptoms. The monetized value of the benefits ranges from $17 billion to $41 billion in 2013--

outweighing the costs by at least $14 billion.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 06/09/2010 75 FR 32682 

NPRM 06/04/2010 75 FR 32006 

NPRM Comment Period End 07/19/2010 

NPRM Comment Period Extended To 08/03/2010 

Final Action 06/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480afbb49; Split from RIN 2060-AM44. This

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

183
rulemaking combines the area source rulemaking for boilers and the rulemaking for re-establishing the vacated NESHAP for

boilers and process heaters.; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business;

Governmental Jurisdictions; Organizations

Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Federalism: Yes

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325; 611; 322; 221; 321

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AM44

Agency Contact: Brian Shrager Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C439-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-7689 

E-Mail: shrager.brian@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robert J Wayland Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C439-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1045 

E-Mail: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ30

 View Related Documents

Title: Remaining Air Quality Designations for the 2006 24-Hour Fine Particle National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Abstract: On November 13, 2009, EPA designated 31 areas across the country as nonattainment for the 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS. These air quality designations were based on 2005-2007 data and analyses, with EPA taking into consideration 2006-

2008 air quality monitoring data. EPA’s evaluation of 2006-2008 air quality monitoring data indicated that monitors in three

areas which had not violated the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS based on 2005-2007 data were now violating the standards

based on 2006-2008 data. These monitors are located in Pinal County, AZ (2006-2008 24-hour design value of 48); Plumas

County, CA (2006-2008 24-hour design value of 49); and, Shasta County, CA (2006-2008 24-hour design value of 48). For the

three newly violating areas, EPA did not finalize initial designations. Because these areas are newly violating the 2006 24-hour

PM2.5 NAAQS, EPA and the states and tribes in these areas needed further information in order to determine the appropriate

nonattainment area boundaries for these areas, in accordance with the process that EPA has used for other nonattainment area

designations, per section 107(d). In this final action, EPA will complete air quality designations for these three areas, and by

doing so, for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: sec 107(d) of the CAA

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AP27. Regional Offices play a significant role in the designations process;

EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0562

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Elizabeth Palma Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Washington , DC 20460 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

184
Phone: 919 541-5432 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: palma.elizabeth@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Carla Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3347 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ31

 View Related Documents

Title: Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Modifications to Renewable Fuel Standard Program

Abstract: In the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007), Congress amended the Clean Air Act (CAA) to

change requirements for the existing Renewable Fuel Standard program. The final regulations promulgating changes to the

Renewable Fuel Standard program ("RFS2 regulations") were published in the Federal Register on March 26, 2010 (75 FR

14670). Since publication, EPA has discovered a number of technical errors and areas within the final RFS2 regulations that

could benefit from clarification. Many of the amendments address grammatical or typographical errors, or provide clarifications to

the regulatory language. A few amendments are being made in order to correct regulatory language that inadvertently

misrepresented our intent as reflected in the preamble to the final RFS2 regulations. Examples of amendments included in this

rule are a clarification that the independent engineering reviews can be conducted by a licensed professional engineer, rather

than the more limited “Professional Chemical Engineer” and a clarification that the renewable biomass aggregate compliance

approach applies to feedstocks from existing U.S. agricultural land, rather than to U.S. producers of renewable fuel. The final

RFS2 regulations will become effective July 1, 2010. This technical amendments package is important in order to correct

technical errors and address areas in the regulations that need clarification simultaneous with the effective date of the final

regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 211(o)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Signature required for RFS2 technical amendments to be effective July

1, 2010 (effective date of final RFS2 regulations). 04/30/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 05/10/2010 75 FR 26026 

NPRM 05/10/2010 75 FR 26049 

NPRM Comment Period End 06/09/2010 

Partial Withdrawal of DFRM 06/30/2010 75 FR 37733 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480aea2df; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2005-0161

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Megan Brachtl Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9473 

E-Mail: brachtl.megan@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

185
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ33

 View Related Documents

Title: Revision of Certain Provisions of the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule

Abstract: EPA has conducted and will continue to conduct extensive outreach with stakeholders affected by and interested in

the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. In response to questions received during these stakeholder meetings, EPA is

proposing amendments to make clarifying and technical changes to eleven subparts of the final rule that were either not clear,

or did not have the intended effect. In addition, some of the proposed changes are being made as part of settlement agreements

regarding challenges to the October rule filed by several organizations. This action would not fundamentally change the

structure of the program. This proposal is complementary to the proposed rulemaking: Technical Corrections, Clarifying and

Other Amendments, published on June 15, 2010. Together, these two proposed rulemakings address the most significant

questions raised during implementation.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/11/2010 75 FR 48743 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#home;

EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Agency Contact: Sean Hogan Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AIR7

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9233 

FAX: 415 947-3579

E-Mail: hogan.sean@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lisa Hanle Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9434 

E-Mail: hanle.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ34

 View Related Documents

Title: Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other Amendments to Certain Provisions of the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas

Reporting Rule

Abstract: EPA has conducted and will continue to conduct extensive outreach with stakeholders affected by and interested in

the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. In response to questions received during these stakeholder meetings, EPA is

proposing amendments to make clarifying and technical changes to nineteen subparts of the final rule that were either not clear,

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

186
or did not have the intended effect, including correcting the location of monitoring equipment or emissions factors. This action

would make relatively minor changes that ease implementation. It would not fundamentally change the structure of the program

or its requirements. This proposal is complementary to the proposed rulemaking: Revision of Certain Provisions of the

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule, signed July 20, 2010. Together, these two proposed rulemakings address the

most significant questions raised during implementation.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/15/2010 75 FR 33950 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b01c4e; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2010-0109

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Agency Contact: Sean Hogan Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AIR7

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9233 

FAX: 415 947-3579

E-Mail: hogan.sean@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lisa Hanle Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9434 

E-Mail: hanle.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ36

 View Related Documents

Title: Supplemental Determinations for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Palm Oil

Abstract: As indicated in the final rule for the Renewable Fuels Standard Program, while the Agency issued lifecycle

greenhouse gas (GHG) threshold determinations for the major fuel pathways projected to meet the bulk of the RFS volume

mandates, assessments of other new fuel pathways such biofuels produced from palm oil, could not be completed in time for

the final rule. In the process of assessing these fuels, the Agency is issuing determinations through several supplemental

notices to the final rule. For this supplemental notice, EPA plans to publish a final determination for ethanol produced and

biomass-based diesel produced from palm oil. The Agency will issue a Direct Final Notice of Supplemental Determination in

early November.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86, 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 211(o)

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

187
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO81; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ– OAR–2005–0161

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/index.htm

Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6520J ARN

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1123 

FAX: 202 564-1686

E-Mail: Argyropoulos.Paul@epa.gov

Agency Contact: David Korotney Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C99

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4507 

FAX: 734 14-4018

E-Mail: Korotney.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ45

 View Related Documents

Title: Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits Under the "Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of

Greenhouse Gas Emissions" Federal Implementation Plan

Abstract: EPA is finalizing a federal implementation plan (FIP) to apply in any state that is unable to submit, by its specified

deadline, a corrective state implementation plan (SIP) revision to ensure that the state has authority to issue permits under the

Clean Air Act's New Source Review Prevention of Significant Deterioration ("PSD") program for sources of greenhouse gases

("GHGs"). This final action is a companion rulemaking to RIN 2060-AQ08, "Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits Under

the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Finding of Substantial

Inadequacy and SIP Call," which is being signed and published on the same schedule; EPA finalizing a finding of substantial

inadequacy and is issuing a SIP call for a number of states on grounds that their SIPs do not apply the PSD program to GHGemitting sources.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM Comment Period Extended 09/02/2010 75 FR 53883 

Final Action 12/00/2011 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AQ08; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0107

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

188
RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AQ08

Agency Contact: Lisa Sutton Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3450 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Sutton.Lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ49

 View Related Documents

Title: Supplemental Determination for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Pulpwood

Abstract: As indicated in the final rule for the Renewable Fuels Standard Program, while the Agency issued lifecycle

greenhouse gas (GHG) threshold determinations for the major fuel pathways projected to meet the bulk of the RFS volume

mandates, assessments of other new fuel pathways such as renewable fuels from pulpwood could not be completed in time for

the final rule. In the process of assessing these fuels, the Agency is issuing determinations through several supplemental

notices to the final rule. For this supplemental notice, EPA plans to publish a final determination for cellulosic biofuels produced

from pulpwood. The Agency will issue a Direct Final Notice of Supplemental Determination in February.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86, 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Section 211(o)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AQ36. Split from RIN 2060-AO81; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ– OAR–

2005–0161

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Yes

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/index.htm

Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6520J ARN

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1123 

FAX: 202 564-1686

E-Mail: Argyropoulos.Paul@epa.gov

Agency Contact: David Korotney Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C99

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

189
Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4507 

FAX: 734 14-4018

E-Mail: Korotney.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ51

 View Related Documents

Title: Performance Specification 4C—Specifications and Test Procedures for Low-Level Carbon Monoxide Continuous

Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources

Abstract: This performance specification (PS) would be used to evaluate the acceptability of low-level carbon monoxide (CO)

continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS). Our existing performance specifications for CO (PS 4, 4A, and 4B) are

unable to accommodate low CO levels. This performance specification is necessary to evaluate CEMS used to monitor low CO

limits specified in upcoming regulations for boilers and incinerators.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule 02/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local

Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Lula Melton Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C304-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2910 

FAX: 919 541-1903

E-Mail: melton.lula@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ53

 View Related Documents

Title: Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other Amendments to Certain Provisions of the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas

Reporting Rule

Abstract: EPA has conducted and will continue to conduct extensive outreach with stakeholders affected by and interested in

the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. In response to questions received during these stakeholder meetings, EPA is

proposing amendments to make clarifying and technical changes to nineteen subparts of the final rule that were either not clear,

or did not have the intended effect, including correcting the location of monitoring equipment or emissions factors. This action

would make relatively minor changes that ease implementation. It would not fundamentally change the structure of the program

or its requirements. This proposal is complementary to the proposed rulemaking: Revision of Certain Provisions of the

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule, signed July 20, 2010. Together, these two proposed rulemakings address the

most significant questions raised during implementation.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

190
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/15/2010 75 FR 33950 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b01c4e; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2010-0109

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Agency Contact: Sean Hogan Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AIR7

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9233 

FAX: 415 947-3579

E-Mail: hogan.sean@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lisa Hanle Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9434 

E-Mail: hanle.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AE94

 View Related Documents

Title: NSPS: SOCMI--Wastewater and Amendments

Abstract: These standards are based on a combination of control techniques that require removal or destruction of volatile

organic compounds from wastewater at synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry plants. Designated chemical process

units, i.e., process lines or process units, would be subject to the rule. Constructed, reconstructed, or modified designated

chemical process units would be required to apply appropriate controls to affected wastewater tanks, surface impoundments,

containers, individual drain systems, and oil and water separators, and to treat process wastewater to remove or destroy the

volatile organic compounds. On September 12, 1994, EPA proposed Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources:

Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) Wastewater (40

CFR part 60, subpart YYY). On October 11, 1995, the EPA issued a supplemental proposal, which clarified and revised the

previously proposed rule. On December 9, 1998, EPA published a supplement to the proposed rule that consisted of revised

definitions, alternative test procedures, and clarifications of requirements, and that proposed to add appendix J to 40 CFR part

60. In conjunction with the rule development for the NSPS, amendments to appendix C to part 63 were proposed on June 30,

2004. The final rule will encompass the clarifications and revisions to subpart YYY, appendix J, and 40 CFR part 63 appendix C.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 app J to part 60; 40 CFR 63 app C to part 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of

Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM (NSPS) 09/12/1994 59 FR 46780 

Supplemental NPRM 1 10/11/1995 60 FR 52889 

Supplemental NPRM 1 Comment Period End 11/13/1995 

Supplemental NPRM 2 12/09/1998 63 FR 67988 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

191
Supplemental NPRM 2 Comment Period End 02/08/1999 

NPRM Amendment 06/30/2004 69 FR 39383 

NPRM Amendment Comment Period End 08/30/2004 

Supplemental NPRM 08/00/2014 

Final Action 10/00/2015 

Additional Information: SAN No. 3380; EPA publication information: Supplemental NPRM 2 -

http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/December/Day-09/a28472a.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-

0191.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3251

Agency Contact: Mary Kissell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4516 

FAX: 919 685-3219

E-Mail: Kissell.Mary@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Kent Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

E-Mail: Hustvedt.Ken@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AJ86

 View Related Documents

Title: Performance Specifications for Continuous Parameter Monitoring Systems

Abstract: Compliance with many air rules is determined through use of process parameter values, instead of direct

measurements of the pollutants of concern. No uniform set of requirements that inform users of parameter monitoring devices

of the suitability of the devices for specific tasks or the ability of the devices to provide valid data to determine compliance exist.

This rule would establish minimum acceptable requirements, both for initial installation and ongoing operation, for five common

classes of parameter monitoring devices–-temperature, pressure, flow rate (liquid, gas, and mass), pH, and conductivity. In

addition, this rule would revise portions of other rules to ensure a consistent approach for parameter monitoring. Finally,

unrelated to parameter monitoring, the rule would clarify ongoing quality assurance requirements for direct measurement

devices that detect multiple pollutants. The rule was proposed on October 9, 2008, and it can be found beginning on page

59,956 of Volume 73 of the Federal Register. Several commenters questioned the costs associated with the proposed rule and

at least one commenter asked for a performance-based rule. The Agency is considering the comments received on the

proposed rule and currently intends to issue a supplemental proposal to solicit additional public input.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 subpart SS; 40 CFR 63.8; 40 CFR 60 app B; 40 CFR 60 app F (To search for a specific CFR, visit

the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412(b)(5) et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/09/2008 73 FR 59956 

NPRM Comment Period End 12/08/2008 

NPRM Comment Period Extended 12/03/2008 73 FR 73629 

NPRM Comment Period Extended To 02/05/2009 

Supplemental NPRM 12/00/2011 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

192
Additional Information: SAN No. 4584; EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2008/October/Day-09/a22674.htm; Based on comments, we expect to begin working on the reproposal next year; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0640.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 21; 486; 562213; 562212; 22

Agency Contact: Barrett Parker Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5635 

FAX: 919 541-1039

E-Mail: parker.barrett@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Bob Schell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4116 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: Schell.Bob@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK73

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Combustion Turbines—Petition To Delist

Abstract: In August 2002, the Agency received a petition to remove certain types of stationary gas-fired combustion turbines

from the list of hazardous air pollutant sources under section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act. After requesting additional data from

the petitioner regarding their petition and reviewing the additional data, the Agency proposed a partial granting of the petition by

proposing to delist four subcategories of stationary gas-fired turbines in April 2004. Simultaneously, the Agency proposed a stay

of the effectiveness of the combustion turbine maximum achievable control technology (MACT) for new sources in those

subcategories of turbines, delaying the imposition of control requirements for the proposed delisted new turbines until a final

action is taken regarding the delisting. The Agency is waiting until the completion of the final Integrated Risk Information System

(IRIS) assessment for formaldehyde before taking final action on the petition. The final IRIS action on formaldehyde is expected

to occur in fall 2011.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM–Delisting 04/07/2004 69 FR 18327 

NPRM–STAY 04/07/2004 69 FR 18338 

NPRM–STAY Comment Period End 05/24/2004 

NPRM–Delisting Comment Period End 06/07/2004 

Final Action–STAY 08/18/2004 69 FR 51184 

Final Action 11/00/2012 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4751; EPA publication information: NPRM-STAY - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2004/April/Day-07/a7775.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0196.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

193
Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 3336; 221112

Agency Contact: Melanie King Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2469 

E-Mail: king.melanie@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robert Wayland Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1045 

FAX: 919 541-5450

E-Mail: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK84

 View Related Documents

Title: Petition to Delist Hazardous Air Pollutant: 4,4'-Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate

Abstract: The Clean Air Act requires EPA to regulate 187 compounds that are listed as air toxics, also known as hazardous

air pollutants. Air toxics are those pollutants known, or suspected, to cause cancer and other adverse human health problems.

The law requires EPA to consider petitions to modify the list, by adding or removing substances. Individuals seeking to remove a

substance must demonstrate that there are adequate data to support their petition. The Agency received a petition to remove

4,4'-Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate (MDI) from the American Chemistry Council on December 26, 2002. Once EPA receives a

petition, it conducts two reviews: a completeness review, to determine whether there is sufficient information on which to base a

decision; and a technical review, to evaluate the merits of the petition. This petition was deemed complete in March 2006. There

appears to be no question about the toxicity of MDI; rather the industry argues that there are little or no exposures due to the

extremely low vapor pressure of MDI.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Proposed Response 00/00/0000 

Notice of Complete Petition 05/26/2005 70 FR 30407 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0085

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: KC Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Scott Jenkins Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C445-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1167 

E-Mail: jenkins.scott@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

194
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AL84

 View Related Documents

Title: Lifting the Stay of the Eight-Hour Portion of the Findings of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Purposes of

Reducing Interstate Ozone Transport ("NOx SIP Call")

Abstract: In the Nitrogen Oxides State Implementation Plan Call (NOx SIP Call)(63 FR 57356, October 27, 1998), EPA found

that emissions of NOx from 22 States and the District of Columbia (hereinafter referred to as '23 States') significantly contribute

to downwind areas' nonattainment of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA also separately found that NOx emissions from the same

23 States significantly contribute to downwind nonattainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Subsequently, the U.S. Court of

Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) remanded the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. [American Trucking Associations,

Inc. v. EPA, 175 F.3d 1027 on rehearing 195 F.3d 4 (D.C. Cir. 1999).] EPA stayed the 8-hour basis of the NOx SIP Call rule on

September 18, 2000 (65 FR 56245) based on the uncertainty created by the D.C. Circuit's decision. EPA has now completed the

actions necessary to address the aforementioned remand, and therefore is now conducting rulemaking to lift the stay. EPA is

proposing to lift the stay of our findings in the NOx SIP Call contained in 40 CFR sec 51.121(a)(2), related to the 8-hour ozone

NAAQS. This action does not create any new requirements; it merely reinstitutes a requirement of the NOx SIP Call that had

previously been stayed.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.121 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4797

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Tim Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4718 

FAX: 919 541-5489

E-Mail: smith.tim@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2940 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: Jones.Rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AL94

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting Emergency Uses of Methyl Bromide

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, this rule would

seek to create an exemption for emergency uses of methyl bromide, an ozone-depleting substance. This exemption will be

limited to no more than 20 metric tons per emergency event. This rule would define what qualifies as an emergency use.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

195
Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4819

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov\ozone\mbr

Agency Contact: Ross Brennan Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9226 

E-Mail: Brennan.Ross@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM08

 View Related Documents

Title: NSPS for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

Abstract: This amendment is being issued to clarify what constitutes treated landfill gas, clarify responsibilities for compliance

activities when multiple parties are involved in the ownership and operation of a landfill and the gas collection, control or

treatment system, address fugitive emissions, and address emissions released prior to the current triggers for landfill gas

collection. This action will also include a mandatory review of the New Source Performance Standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Supplemental NPRM 00/00/0000 

NPRM 09/08/2006 71 FR 53272 

Additional Information: NPRM was published 09/08/2006 (71 FR 53272) as RIN 2060-AJ41; EPA Docket information:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0215

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Related RINs: Previously Reported as 2060-

AH13; Previously Reported as 2060-AJ41

Agency Contact: Hillary Ward Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

196
Phone: 919 541-3154 

E-Mail: ward.hillary@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM20

 View Related Documents

Title: Petition to Delist a Hazardous Air Pollutant From Section 112 of the Clean Air Act: Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (MIBK)

Abstract: The Ketones Panel of the American Chemistry Council (ACC) has petitioned the Agency to remove methyl isobutyl

ketone (MIBK) from the Clean Air Act (CAA) hazardous air pollutant (HAP) list. The ACC originally submitted the petition in April

of 1997. EPA suspended review of the petition pending the completion of 2-generation reproductive effects study. That study is

now complete. On October 17, 2003, the ACC submitted an addendum to the 1997 petition which includes: the results of the 2-

generation reproductive effects study, a presentation of the updated EPA IRIS file for MIBK, updated air dispersion modeling

and an analysis of potential transformation products. Based on this new submission, the ACC requested that EPA reopen its

review of the MIBK petition. EPA did reopen its review of the petition. However, since the last submittal by the petitioner, a 2-

year MIBK bio-assay by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) has been completed. A draft report of this study was reviewed

by the NTP Board of Scientific Counselors Technical Reports Review Subcommittee, which accepted unanimously the

conclusions in the report that there is some evidence of carcinogenic activity of MIBK. EPA has notified the petitioner that further

review of the petition will require that the petitioner submit information regarding the relevance of the NTP study and a risk

characterization for the human risk of cancer from MIBK exposures, which would include the derivation of a cancer unit risk

estimate.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Proposed Response 00/00/0000 

Notice 07/19/2004 69 FR 42954 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4849; EPA publication information: Notice -

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06jun20041800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2004/04-16335.htm.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM49

 View Related Documents

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

197
Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Certification of Recovery and Recovery/Recycling Equipment Intended for Use With

Substitute Refrigerants

Abstract: Using authority under section 608 of the Clean Air Act, EPA has established a certification program for refrigerant

recovery and recycling equipment. Recovery equipment is specific to the refrigerant and as alternative refrigerants enter the

market, new equipment to capture those refrigerants also enter the market. This action would amend the existing provisions to

reflect that new equipment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4916

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608

Agency Contact: Julius Banks Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9870 

FAX: 202 565-2155

E-Mail: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM55

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Modifications to the Technician Certification Requirements Under Section 608 of the

Clean Air Act

Abstract: This rule would amend Appendix D to subpart F of 40 CFR part 82-Standards for Becoming a Certifying Program

for Technicians. The Refrigerant Recycling Regulations governing standards for certifying programs for technicians were

promulgated under section 608 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 in 1994. This rule would update parts of the

regulations concerning the technician certification examination. The examination needs to reflect developments in new

refrigerants, equipment, and technology over the last 12 years. This rule would provide specific requirements for programs

applying to become certifying organizations, would specify reporting and recordkeeping requirements in order to enhance

implementation of the program, and would define other administrative components of the program to improve accountability.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4901

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

198
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608/index.html

Sectors Affected: 3334

Agency Contact: Monica Shimamura Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9337 

E-Mail: Shimamura.Monica@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Julius Banks Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9870 

FAX: 202 565-2155

E-Mail: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM75

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: General Provisions (Once In Always In)—Amendments

Abstract: These amendments would have addressed potential changes to EPA's policy on when a major source can become

an area source, and thus become not subject to national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for major

sources. The Agency is considering whether further action on this proposal is appropriate.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 01/03/2007 72 FR 69 

NPRM; Extension of Comment Period 03/05/2007 72 FR 9718 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2007/January/Day03/a22283.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAQ-2004-0094

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D205-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5060 

FAX: 919 541-5600

E-Mail: conner.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

199
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM87

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Taconite Iron Ore Processing; Amendments

Abstract: EPA promulgated National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Taconite Iron Ore

Processing on October 30, 2003 (68 FR 61867). The National Wildlife Federation (NWF) filed a petition for review, raising

several technical issues, including the alleged failure of EPA to establish emission standards for mercury and asbestos. EPA

took a voluntarily remand of the mercury and asbestos standards. EPA is planning to address both remands when this

NESHAP is due for the Risk and Technology Review (RTR) in 2011.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4929

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 21221

Agency Contact: Conrad Chin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1512 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: chin.conrad@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2837 

FAX: 919 541-4991

E-Mail: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN30

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Revision to Listing of Carbon Dioxide Total Flooding Fire Extinguishing Systems

Restricting Use to Only Unoccupied Areas

Abstract: Section 612 of the Clean Air Act requires EPA to identify alternatives to Class I and II ozone-depleting substances

and to publish lists of acceptable and unacceptable substitutes. Carbon dioxide is currently listed as an "acceptable" total

flooding substitute for ozone-depleting halons. Carbon dioxide total flooding systems are used in industrial applications such as

automobile paint rooms and in marine applications such as machinery spaces. Recent changes to national fire protection

industry standards reflect a need to improve personnel safety requirements for carbon dioxide systems by limiting its

applications. Based on new information on the continued and growing use of carbon dioxide total flooding fire extinguishing

systems, EPA is proposing to revise the listing to "acceptable subject to narrowed use limits" to ensure that the use of this

agent does not pose greater risk than other substitutes that are available. Use would be limited to unoccupied areas where

personnel could not be exposed to lethal concentration of the agent.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

200
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4991

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap

Agency Contact: Bella Maranion Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9749 

E-Mail: Maranion.Bella@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN36

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Site Remediation Amendments—Response to Litigation

Abstract: The Site Remediation NESHAP regulation was promulgated on October 8, 2003. EPA was challenged by the

Sierra Club on several provisions in the rule. The main issues involve exemptions to the rule's requirements for cleanups

performed under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) or Superfund authorities, and an exemption for units

handling radioactive mixed waste.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 subpart GGGGG (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AM30; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0021

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Greg Nizich Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3078 

E-Mail: Nizich.Greg@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Kent Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

201
Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

E-Mail: Hustvedt.Ken@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN43

 View Related Documents

Title: Federal Plan Requirements for Other Solid Waste Incineration Units Constructed on or Before December 9, 2004

Abstract: In this Other Solid Waste Incineration (OSWI) Federal plan rulemaking, EPA becomes an implementing authority in

those instances where the State or local agency has failed to submit a plan or a plan has not yet been approved. Therefore,

consistent with section 129(b)(3) of the Act, this rulemaking would impose a Federal plan that applies to OSWI in any State,

tribe, or locale that has not submitted an approvable plan within the time allotted. This action makes no changes to the

requirements in the December 2005 rule, and is intended to fulfill EPA’s duty under section 129(b)(3) to promulgate a Federal

plan as a gap-filling measure until the State fulfills its statutory obligations. When the State submits an approvable State Plan,

the Federal plan will no longer apply to units in that State.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 62 (New) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA sec 129; CAA sec 111(d)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 12/18/2006 71 FR 75816 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAWASTE/2006/December/Day-18/f21285.htm; Legal Deadline continued: Federal Plan must be promulgated 2 years after the

final publication of the Emission Guidelines rule (December 16, 2005, 70 FR 74869, http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2005/December/Day-16/a23716.htm); EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0364

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental

Jurisdictions Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 562213

Agency Contact: Martha Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27709 

Phone: 919 541-2421 

E-Mail: smith.martha@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ketan Patel Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-9736 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: patel.ketan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN63

 View Related Documents

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

202
Title: Requirements for Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) Under the 8-Hour Ozone Standard for Bump-Up Areas Designated

Attainment for the 1-Hour Ozone Standard Prior to Revocation

Abstract: Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) is gasoline blended to reduce emissions that cause ozone smog. The Clean Air Act

(CAA) requires certain areas to use RFG, depending on how serious is the ozone problem—i.e., how far it is from attaining the

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone. In some cases, areas that previously had a less-serious ozone

problem subsequently experience worse air quality, and in such cases the Clean Air Act requires them to be "bumped up" to a

higher category, thereby requiring RFG use. One complication is that the Agency is now implementing the transition from the

previous ozone standard, based on the amount of pollution measured over a 1-hour period, to the new ozone standard, based

on an 8-hour period. This rule would set regulations for such cases.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act 211(k)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/23/2006 71 FR 36042 

Final Action 12/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2006/June/Day23/a5620.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0318

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Kurt Gustafson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6406J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9219 

FAX: 202 343-2800

E-Mail: gustafson.kurt@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Leila Cook Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AASMCG

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4820 

E-Mail: cook.leila@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN72

 View Related Documents

Title: Petroleum Refineries—New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)—Subparts J and Ja

Abstract: On June 24, 2008, EPA promulgated amendments to the Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries and

new standards for process units constructed, reconstructed, or modified after May 14, 2007. EPA received three petitions for

reconsideration of the final rule. On September 26, 2008, EPA granted reconsideration and issued a stay for the issues raised

in the petitions regarding process heaters and flares. Under this action, EPA will address these issues.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

203
Reconsideration—Final 00/00/0000 

NPRM 05/14/2007 72 FR 27178 

NPRM Comment Period Extended 06/28/2007 72 FR 35375 

NPRM Comment Period End 07/13/2007 

NPRM Comment Period Extended To 08/27/2007 

Final Rule 06/24/2008 73 FR 35838 

Reconsideration—NPRM 12/22/2008 73 FR 78546 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2007/May/Day14/a8547.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0011

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32411

Agency Contact: Brenda Shine Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C439-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3608 

FAX: 919 685-3219

E-Mail: shine.brenda@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN93

 View Related Documents

Title: Improving Implementation of the Operating Permit Rules in Response to CAAA Committee Recommendations

Abstract: This action addresses potential improvements to the regulations implementing the Clean Air Act's title V operating

permits program. Under the title V program, each facility that is a major source of specified air pollutants is required to obtain a

permit that describes allowable emissions and other conditions. The improvements to the program were recommended to EPA

by a 18-member Task Force formed by the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee, with representatives from industry, environmental

groups, and state and local agencies.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70; 40 CFR 71 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5079

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Agency Contact: Jennifer Snyder Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

204
Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3003 

FAX: 919 685-3105

E-Mail: snyder.jennifer@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: rao.raj@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO07

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing—Amendments

Abstract: On November 10, 2003, EPA promulgated national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for

miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing. The rule is referred to as the miscellaneous organic NESHAP or the MON. The

MON incorporates by reference the wastewater tank requirements in the National Emission Standards for Organic Hazardous

Air Pollutants From the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry for Process Vents, Storage Vessels, Transfer

Operations, and Wastewater, which EPA promulgated on April 24, 1994, and which is referred to as the hazardous organic

NESHAP or the HON. On August 6, 2008 EPA proposed amending the HON, and thereby, the MON, by adding an equivalent

means of emission limitation for wastewater tanks.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 08/06/2008 73 FR 45673 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2008/August/Day06/a18142.pdf; Split from RIN 2060-AM43; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0121

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Randy McDonald Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5402 

FAX: 919 541-0246

E-Mail: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

205
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO55

 View Related Documents

Title: Petroleum Refinery Residual Risk Standards

Abstract: Under CAA section 112(d)(6) EPA is required to review standards issued under section 112 and to revise them "as

necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8

years. EPA also must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards under CAA

section 112 (f)(2) if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental

effect. The final rule was signed on January 16, 2009, but was not published in the Federal Register. On October 28, 2009,

EPA proposed to withdraw the residual risk and technology portions of the final rule, in order to gather better emissions

information from the refining industry. On the same day, EPA finalized amendments to the rule that implements requirements for

heat exchange systems under CAA section 112(d)(2).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action - Partial Withdrawal 00/00/0000 

NPRM 09/04/2007 72 FR 50716 

Supplemental NPRM 11/10/2008 73 FR 66694 

NPRM - Partial Withdrawal 10/28/2009 74 FR 55505 

Final Action - Heat Exchangers 10/28/2009 74 FR 55670 

Final Action - Heat Exchangers Correction 06/30/2010 75 FR 37730 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://frwebgate1.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?

WAISdocID=049012415583+2+2+0&WAISaction=retrieve; Split from RIN 2060-AN85.; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR2003-0146

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2007/September/Day-04/a17009.pdf

Sectors Affected: 32411

Agency Contact: Bob Lucas Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-0884 

FAX: 919 541-0246

E-Mail: lucas.bob@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO68

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

206
 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Labeling of Products Using HCFCs

Abstract: In accordance with section 611 of the Clean Air Act, this action would require a warning statement on containers or

products made with or containing a Class II ozone depleting substance (ODS). EPA promulgated a similar rule in 1993 for

containers or products made with or containing Class I ODS. Such rules may help consumers and others make more informed

choices about using products which damage the stratospheric ozone layer, resulting in increased skin damage and cancers.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671j

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5151

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/labeling

Sectors Affected: 333415; 4431; 335222; 33341

Agency Contact: Monica Shimamura Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9337 

E-Mail: Shimamura.Monica@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Bella Maranion Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9749 

E-Mail: Maranion.Bella@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO75

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone: Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning System Servicing

Abstract: The motor vehicle air conditioning industry is considering moving to alternative refrigerants. This action would

establish service, maintenance, and equipment provisions, as required by the Clean Air Act, for new alternative refrigerants in

the motor vehicle air conditioning sector. These provisions will help ensure the safe and effective servicing of motor vehicle air

conditioning systems.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

207
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5206

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap

Sectors Affected: 44131; 811111; 44111

Agency Contact: Yaidi Cancel Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9512 

FAX: 202 343-2338

E-Mail: cancel.yaidi@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Cindy Newberg Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9729 

E-Mail: Newberg.Cindy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO97

 View Related Documents

Title: Risk and Technology Review Phase II Group 3

Abstract: Under the "technology review" provision of CAA section 112, EPA is required to review maximum achievable

control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them “as necessary (taking into account developments in practices,

processes and control technologies)” no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of CAA section

112, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide

an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. EPA has combined the remaining

MACT source categories requiring residual risk and technology reviews into several groups of "risk and technology" (RTR)

reviews. This action focuses on RTR Group 3 which consists of 18 MACT standards with MACT compliance dates of 2003 and

earlier.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA sec 112(f); CAA sec 112(d)(6)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice of Data Availability 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5196

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Paula Hirtz Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

208
Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2618 

FAX: 919 541-0246

E-Mail: hirtz.paula@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP00

 View Related Documents

Title: Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes

Abstract: This proposal will revise subpart H of 40 CFR part 51, which establishes the requirements for that portion of State

implementation plans to address air pollution emergency episodes. The proposal includes the following: (1) revisions to the

emergency episode requirements to simplify the emergency episode classification system for air quality control regions for all

NAAQS pollutants; (2) criteria for establishing those areas that need to develop emergency episode plans to address PM2.5;

and (3) revisions to appendix L (an example State emergency episode regulation) to include example regulations to address

PM2.5.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-1046

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 9241

Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3356 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: Sanders.Dave@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP07

 View Related Documents

Title: Remand of Halogenated Solvent Cleaning Final Residual Risk Rule

Abstract: EPA promulgated technology-based emission standards for this source category in 1992 under section 112(d) of

the Clean Air Act. These standards are codified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart T. On May 3, 2007, EPA also promulgated

amendments to the NESHAP standards as required by sections 112(f) and 112(d)(6) of the Clean Air Act. Petitions have been

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

209
filed requesting EPA to reconsider its emission standards under the May 3, 2007, final rule. EPA issued a proposed

reconsideration rule on October 20, 2008. In November 2009, EPA was granted a remand of this rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Reproposal 00/00/0000 

NPRM 10/20/2008 73 FR 62384 

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 12/03/2008 73 FR 73631 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0009

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 334; 335; 332; 337; 333; 339; 331; 336

Agency Contact: Amy Hambrick Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-0964 

FAX: 919 541-3470

E-Mail: Hambrick.Amy@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-5335 

E-Mail: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP21

 View Related Documents

Title: Response to Section 126 Petition From Warrick County, Indiana and the Town of Newburgh, Indiana

Abstract: This rulemaking will respond to a petition submitted by Warrick County, Indiana and the Town of Newburgh,

Indiana under section 126 of the Clean Air Act. The petition requests that EPA make a finding that a power plant being

proposed to be built in Henderson County, Kentucky (Cash Creek) will emit air pollutants that will significantly contribute to

nonattainment in, or interfere with maintenance by, Warrick County and Newburgh, Indiana with respect to the national ambient

air quality standards for ozone and particulate matter. Based on such a finding, the petition requests that EPA establish

emission limitations for the proposed power plant to prevent the significant contribution.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 126

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5268

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

210
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Organizations Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Carla Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3347 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2940 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: Jones.Rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP25

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Group I and IV Polymers and Resins: Amendments

Abstract: This action amends the final MACT rule for Group IV Polymers and Resins (subpart JJJ) under National Emission

Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for thermoplastics (Group IV polymers and Resins) by addressing a petition by

Arteva Specialties for reconsideration concerning subcategorization and the control requirements for leaking equipment. The

action will clarify the categorization of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resin using the continuous terephthalic acid high

viscosity multiple end finisher process and determine whether the cost analysis used to regulate leaking equipment should be

based on individual component types rather than the aggregated approach used in the final rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5280

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Randy McDonald Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5402 

FAX: 919 541-0246

E-Mail: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

211
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP38

 View Related Documents

Title: Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to review and, if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria for the primary

(health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On March 23,

2008, the EPA published a final rule to revise the primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone to provide increased protection of

public health and welfare. With regard to the primary standard for ozone, EPA revised the level of the 8-hour ozone standard to

0.075 ppm. With regard to the secondary ozone standard, EPA made it identical in all respects to the primary ozone standard,

as revised. EPA initiated the current review in October 2008 with a workshop to discuss key policy-relevant issues around

which EPA would structure the review. This review includes the preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment,

Risk/Exposure Assessment, and a Policy Assessment Document by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air

Scientific Advisory Committee and the public. These documents inform the Administrator's proposed decision as to whether to

retain or revise the standards.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2013 

Final Action 03/00/2014 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/air/ozone

Agency Contact: Dave Mckee Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5288 

FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: Mckee.Dave@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5274 

FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP43

 View Related Documents

Title: Revision: Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings and Uranium In Situ

Leaching Processing Facilities

Abstract: EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR 192 establish standards for protection of the public health, safety, and environment

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

212
from radiological and nonradiological hazards associated with uranium ore processing, and disposal of resulting waste materials.

These cross-media standards, which apply to pollutant emissions and site restoration, must be adopted by the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, their Agreement States, and the Department of Energy. We propose to review all the standards in the

existing rule, revise the regulations to take into account significant changes in uranium industry technologies and their potential

impacts to groundwater, recent revisions in EPA drinking water protection standards, judicial decisions concerning the subject

regulations, and need for new radiological risk assessments to take into account unanticipated risks to the general public and

environment. New facilities proposed in states from Virginia to Alaska, in addition to ongoing regulatory efforts by the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission for facility licensure and groundwater protection in advance of concomitant revised EPA standards, add

to the importance of this effort.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 192 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 2022, 2114; Atomic Energy Act sec 275; UMTRCA sec 206(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 05/00/2012 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5319

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 212291

Agency Contact: Loren Setlow Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6608J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9445 

FAX: 202 343-2304

E-Mail: Setlow.Loren@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Tom Peake Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6608J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9765 

FAX: 202 343-2304

E-Mail: Peake.Tom@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP51

 View Related Documents

Title: Response to Section 126 Petition From North Carolina

Abstract: EPA is reconsidering its decision to deny the petition submitted by the State of North Carolina to EPA pursuant to

section 126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). North Carolina submitted a petition on March 18, 2004 alleging that upwind major

sources of PM and ozone precursors were contributing significantly to North Carolina's ability to attain or maintain the PM and

ozone NAAQS. In 2006, EPA denied North Carolina's petition in conjunction with issuing the CAIR federal implementation plan

rule. As a result of a remand of the CAIR, the legal basis for denying the PM part of North Carolina's petition no longer exists.

On March 5, 2009 the D.C. Circuit of Appeals granted our motion for voluntary remand of our decision to deny North Carolina's

petition.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

213
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5347

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Tim Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4718 

FAX: 919 541-5489

E-Mail: smith.tim@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2940 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: Jones.Rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP60

 View Related Documents

Title: Response to Section 126 Petition From Delaware

Abstract: EPA is proposing to take action on a petition submitted by Delaware under section 126 of the Clean Air Act. On

December 18, 2008, EPA received Delaware's section 126 petition. In this petition, Delaware seeks emissions reductions from

large electric generating units in a number of upwind States in order to reduce the contributions from their emissions to PM2.5

and ozone problems in Delaware.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5353

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Tim Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4718 

FAX: 919 541-5489

E-Mail: smith.tim@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

214
Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2940 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: Jones.Rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP68

 View Related Documents

Title: Implementing the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS: Section 185 Penalty Fee Provisions

Abstract: In December 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an opinion

determining that EPA improperly waived the application of the section 185 penalty provision for severe and extreme

nonattainment areas that failed to attain the 1-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS or standard) by their

attainment date. South Coast Air Quality Management District v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (SCAQMD). EPA issued

on January 5, 2010, a memorandum to provide guidance on the section 185 state implementation plan (SIP) and the revisions

required of severe and extreme 1-hour ozone nonattainment areas under EPA’s anti-backsliding rules for the transition to the 8-

hour ozone NAAQS and to provide guidance on alternative programs that may be acceptable consistent with section 172(e) of

the CAA, which allows EPA through rulemaking to accept alternative programs that are “no less stringent.” Section 185 fee SIP

revisions for 1-hour ozone nonattainment areas were due to be submitted to EPA by December 31, 2000 [see section

182(d)(3)]. This guidance has been challenged in court for a review and reconsideration. This action will establish a rulemaking

that addresses how the Clean Air Act section 185 penalty fee provisions apply under the anti-backsliding provisions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7511 to 7511f; 42 USC 7601(a)(1)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO96; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0956

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Lynn Dail Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5550 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: dail.lynn@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Kimber Scavo Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3354 

FAX: 919 541-4028

E-Mail: scavo.kimber@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP69

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

215
 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Brick and Structural Clay Products and Clay Products

Abstract: This rulemaking will establish emission limits for hazardous air pollutants (HF, HCl and metals) emitted from brick

and clay ceramics kilns and glazing operations at clay ceramics production facilities. The brick and structural clay products

industry primarily includes facilities that manufacture brick, clay, pipe, roof tile, extruded floor and wall tile, and other extruded

dimensional clay products from clay, shale, or a combination of the two. The manufacturing of brick and structural clay products

involves mining, raw material processing (crushing, grinding, and screening), mixing, forming, cutting or shaping, drying, and

firing. Ceramics are defined as a class of inorganic, nonmetallic solids that are subject to high temperature in manufacture

and/or use. The clay ceramics manufacturing source category includes facilities that manufacture traditional ceramics, which

include ceramic tile, dinnerware, sanitaryware, pottery, and porcelain. The primary raw material used in the manufacture of these

traditional ceramics is clay. The manufacturing of clay ceramics involves raw material processing (crushing, grinding, and

screening), mixing, forming, shaping, drying, glazing, and firing.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5367

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Jeff Telander Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5427 

FAX: 919 541-5600

E-Mail: Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2837 

FAX: 919 541-4991

E-Mail: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP79

 View Related Documents

Title: Lead Emissions From Piston-Engine Aircraft Using Leaded Aviation Gasoline

Abstract: The purpose of this action is to further respond to a petition submitted by Friends of the Earth (FOE) in 2006. In the

petition, FOE requests that EPA find that lead emissions from general aviation aircraft may reasonably be anticipated to

endanger public health and welfare and that EPA propose emissions standards under the Clean Air Act for lead from general

aviation aircraft. Alternatively, FOE requests that EPA commence a study and investigation of the health and environmental

impacts of lead emissions from general aviation aircraft, if EPA believes that insufficient information exists to make such a

finding. In 2007 EPA issued a Federal Register notice seeking comment on FOE's petition. The notice asked a series of

questions seeking information on exposure to lead emissions from general aviation aircraft, lead emission rates from general

aviation aircraft, unleaded aviation fuel options, and engine technology. EPA has long-standing concerns regarding exposure to

lead, particularly during childhood. The most recent lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards review, finalized in 2008, found

that serious health effects occur at much lower levels of lead in blood than previously identified and did not identify a safe level

of lead exposure. Emissions of lead from piston-engine aircraft using leaded aviation gasoline (avgas) comprise over half of the

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

216
national inventory of lead emitted to air. There are almost 20,000 airport facilities in the U.S. at which leaded avgas is used.

This action will describe the lead inventory related to use of leaded avgas, air quality and exposure information, additional

information the Agency is collecting related to the impact of lead emissions from piston-engine aircraft on air quality and will

request comments on this information.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 87 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7571

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined 

ANPRM 04/28/2010 75 FR 22439 

ANPRM Extension of Comment Period 06/24/2010 75 FR 36034 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ae298f; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2007-0294

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Marion Hoyer Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AAHEBTC

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4513 

E-Mail: Hoyer.Marion@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Meredith Pedde Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AAHEBTC

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4748 

E-Mail: Pedde.Meredith@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ11

 View Related Documents

Title: Risk and Technology Review for Ferroalloys Production

Abstract: This action is the Risk and Technology Review (RTR) for Ferroalloys Production. It will address both EPA's

obligation under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6) to conduct a residual risk review and to conduct a

technology review. Under the "technology review" provision of the CAA section 112, EPA is required to review maximum

achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in

practices, processes, and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of

CAA section 112, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public

healthy or prevent an adverse environmental effect.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 10/31/2011 

Other Judicial 06/29/2012 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

217
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5417

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 331112; 331419

Agency Contact: Conrad Chin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1512 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: chin.conrad@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Susan Fairchild Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5167 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: fairchild.susan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ20

 View Related Documents

Title: Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Phosphoric Acid and Phosphate Fertilizer Production

NESHAPs

Abstract: Phosphate rock is the primary raw material for phosphoric acid, which in turn is the raw material for phosphate

fertilizer. These two rules are grouped together because their production processes are usually located at the same facility. Part

63 NESHAPs for phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizer (subparts AA and BB, respectively) were promulgated in June 1999.

Facilities subject to these rules were required to be in compliance by June 2002. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to address the

risk remaining to the public (i.e., a 'risk review') within eight years after promulgation of the MACT standards. We must also

conduct a technology review of the source categories within eight years to determine whether new technology exists to reduce

emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) below the levels established by the MACT standards. For purposes of expediency,

these two reviews are combined together and called a risk and technology review, or RTR. The amendments will address both

risk reduction and technology advancement for the phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizer source categories. There are no

known small businesses in this source category.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 01/15/2013 

Other Judicial 12/13/2013 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2013 

Final Action 01/00/2014 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5435

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

218
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Susan Fairchild Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5167 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: fairchild.susan@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2837 

FAX: 919 541-4991

E-Mail: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ23

 View Related Documents

Title: Method 16C for the Determination of Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions From Stationary Sources

Abstract: Method 16C is used to determine total reduced sulfur emissions and is being proposed as an alternative to Methods

16, 16A, and 16B for regulated facilities in kraft pulp mills (subpart BB of 40 CFR 60) and other industries that emit these

compounds. Method 16C combines the sample oxidation technology of Method 16A with the instrumental technology of Method

6C to provide a user-friendly, real-time procedure. The Agency has allowed its use in the past on a case-by-case basis and

now believes it should be made available for general use. This method is not required under any rule and does not add any new

testing requirement to the current regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51, 60, 61, and 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7601

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM Comment Period Extended 09/02/2010 75 FR 53908 

Final Action 02/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-21954.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Foston Curtis Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1063 

FAX: 919 541-0516

E-Mail: Curtis.Foston@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-7774 

FAX: 919 541-0516

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

219
E-Mail: Oldham.Conniesue@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ40

 View Related Documents

Title: Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Secondary Aluminum Production NESHAP

Abstract: A secondary aluminum production facility means any establishment using clean charge, aluminum scrap, or dross

from aluminum production as the raw material for processing. The existing 40 CFR part 63, subpart RRR National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Secondary Aluminum Production facilities was promulgated in 2000. This

rule regulates Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) from facilities that are major sources of HAP that operate aluminum scrap

shredders, thermal chip dryers, scrap dryers/delacquering kilns/decoating kilns, group 2 furnaces, sweat furnaces, dross only

furnaces, rotary dross coolers, and secondary aluminum processing units (SAPUs). SAPUs include group 1 furnaces and in-line

fluxers. Area sources of HAP are regulated only with respect to emissions of dioxins/furans (D/F) from thermal chip dryers, scrap

dryers/delacquering kilns/decoating kilns, sweat furnaces, and SAPUs. Facilities subject to these rules were required to be in

compliance by March 2003. Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs EPA to conduct risk assessments on each

source category subject to maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and determine if additional standards are

needed to reduce residual risks. The section 112(f)(2) residual risk review is to be done within 8 years after promulgation.

Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires EPA to review and revise the MACT standards, as necessary, taking into account

developments in practices, processes, and control technologies. The section 112(d)(6) technology review is to be done at least

every 8 years. These risk and technology reviews for secondary aluminum production facilities will be conducted in this

rulemaking, which will address possible residual risks, technology advancements, and technical deficiencies in the existing rule.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 112 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412; 5 USC 801

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2011 

Final Action 09/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0544

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: Undetermined

Agency Contact: Rochelle Boyd Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1390 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: boyd.rochelle@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2837 

FAX: 919 541-4991

E-Mail: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AH93

 View Related Documents

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

220
Title: Revisions to the General Conformity Regulations

Abstract: This final action revised the original General Conformity regulations to reduce unnecessary paperwork burden,

address transition issues to new NAAQS and to respond to concerns based on the experience of implementing federal

agencies.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.850 to 51.860; 40 CFR 93.150 to 93.160 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/08/2008 73 FR 1402 

NPRM Comment Period End 03/10/2008 

Final Action 04/05/2010 75 FR 17254 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4070; EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064803970f4; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2006-0669.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/oar/genconform/regs.htm

Agency Contact: H. Lynn Dail Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2363 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: dail.lynn@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Kimber Scavo Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3354 

FAX: 919 541-4028

E-Mail: scavo.kimber@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AJ61

 View Related Documents

Title: Evaluation of Updated Test Procedures for the Certification of Gasoline Deposit Control Additives

Abstract: All gasoline must contain additives to control the formation of deposits in the fuel supply system and engine of

motor vehicles. If uncontrolled, such deposits can result in a significant increase in motor vehicle emissions. It may be necessary

for EPA to consider amending the certification test requirements for deposit control additives to account for the changes in

vehicle technology and gasoline composition that occurred since 1996. However, there is no compelling environmental or other

need to do so at this time. Therefore, EPA is deferring taking action to amend the gasoline deposit program indefinitely

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA 211

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

221
Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 10/25/2010 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Jeff Herzog Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

ASD

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4227 

E-Mail: Herzog.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN68

 View Related Documents

Title: Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicle Engines: SAFETEA-LU HOV Facilities Rule

Abstract: EPA is not finalizing this rule due to other Agency priorities and the limited time frame for the statute. However, the

Agency will be posting on the Office of Transportation and Quality's website an updated list of qualifying vehicles based on the

proposed gasoline to hybrid comparison methodology. This regulation establishes criteria for certifying a vehicle as low emitting

and energy-efficient. State High-Occupancy-Vehicle (HOV) programs will reference this regulation in their request to Federal

Highway Administration for exceptions to the 2-person minimum occupancy HOV requirement.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 23 USC 1121

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 03/02/2008 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/24/2007 72 FR 29102 

Withdrawn 05/21/2010 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0173

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Mary Manners Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

N104

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4873 

E-Mail: manners.mary@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Holly Pugliese Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AAIO

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4288 

E-Mail: pugliese.holly@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

222
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO15

 View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Portland Cement Notice of Reconsideration and NSPS for Portland Cement

Abstract: The Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)

was promulgated June 14, 1999, and has been codified in 40 Code of Federal Regulations 63, Subpart LLL. This rule regulates

emissions of air toxics from all facilities that produce Portland cement from raw materials such as limestone. (Note that cement

kilns that burn hazardous waste are covered under a different air toxics rule). The Sierra Club and the National Lime

Association petitioned the court to review Subpart LLL, while the American Portland Cement Alliance (APCA, now the Portland

Cement Association - PCA) opted to negotiate a settlement agreement. (Note that a separate rulemaking amended Subpart LLL

to implement the settlement agreement with the APCA -- SAN 4524, RIN 2060-AJ57, Tier 3.) On December 15, 2000, a panel of

the D.C. Circuit issued its opinion in National Lime Association v. EPA. The Court remanded the three standards for which we

established floors of no control (hydrogen chloride [HCl], total hydrocarbon [THC], and mercury [Hg]). The Court found that we

committed error in not considering other means of control, in particular, control of HAPs in raw materials and in fossil fuels. The

Court also remanded that we consider setting beyond-the-floor standards for HAP metals, for which particulate matter (PM) is a

surrogate. On December 20, 2006, EPA published final amendments to the Portland cement air toxics rule to respond to the

December 2000 remand (SAN 4585, RIN 2060-AJ78, Tier 3). At the same time as the final amendments were published, EPA

also published a notice of reconsideration of the final new source limits for mercury and total hydrocarbons (a surrogate for nondioxin organic toxic air pollutants), and a reconsideration of the ban on the use of certain mercury containing fly ash in both new

and existing cement kilns. The Agency took this action because there were still substantive technical issues and there was not

sufficient opportunity for public comment on parts of the final action. EPA also granted a petition to reconsider the existing

source emissions limits for mercury and THC, and also our decision not to regulate hydrochloric acid emissions. As part of this

reconsideration, EPA has conducted extensive data gathering and analysis, including requirements for emissions testing. Based

on evaluation of the gathered data, on May 6, 2009, EPA proposed numerical emissions limits for mercury, total hydrocarbons,

and hydrochloric acid for both new and existing cement kilns In addition, we significantly lowered the cement kiln new and

existing source particulate matter standards In addition this action will address New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)

criteria pollutants from new stationary sources. The Portland Cement NSPS were originally promulgated in 1971, and last

reviewed in 1988. Section 111 of the Clean Air Act requires that NSPS be reviewed every 8 years, and revised as appropriate,

so the review is overdue. Amendments to the NSPS were proposed on June 16 2008, under a different rulemaking (2060-A042).

EPA has combined the NSPS amendments and the rulemaking on air toxics into one action.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: State, Local, Or Tribal Governments;

Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1340 to 63.1359 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 04/21/2009 

Other Judicial 06/06/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/06/2009 74 FR 21135 

Notice of Public Hearings and Extension of Public Comment Period 06/09/2009 74 FR 27265 

NPRM Comment Period End 07/06/2009 

NPRM Comment Period Extended To 09/04/2009 

Final Action 09/09/2010 75 FR 54970 

Final Action Effective 11/08/2010 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4585.1; EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-

10206.pdf; Split from RIN 2060-AJ78; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0051.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Keith Barnett Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

223
Phone: 919 541-5605 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: Barnett.Keith@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2837 

FAX: 919 541-4991

E-Mail: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO24

 View Related Documents

Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration for PM2.5—Increments, Significant Impact Levels, and Significant Monitoring

Concentrations

Abstract: EPA is finalizing regulations under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program to establish new

increments, significant impact levels (SILs) and a significant monitoring concentration (SMC) for fine particulate matter (particles

with an aerometric diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5 micrometers, “PM2.5”). These regulations are consistent with

section 166 of the Clean Air Act which authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency to establish regulations to prevent

significant deterioration of air quality due to emissions of any pollutant for which National Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS) have been promulgated. The NAAQS for PM2.5 were promulgated in 1997. To help facilitate the states’

implementation of the preconstruction review permit process, this action will also establish screening tools (SILs and SMC) to

determine when sources must complete analyses to satisfy specific requirements associated with the evaluation of PM2.5

impacts.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52.21; 40 CFR 51.166 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7470-7479; 42 USC 7501-7503; 42 USC 7601(a)(1)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/21/2007 72 FR 54112 

Notice of Extension of Comments 11/20/2007 72 FR 65282 

NPRM Comment Period End 01/08/2008 

Final Action 10/20/2010 75 FR 64864 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=090000648029651b; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2006-0605

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Agency Contact: Dan deRoeck Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5593 

FAX: 919 685-3009

E-Mail: Deroeck.Dan@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

224
Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO38

 View Related Documents

Title: Control of Emissions From New Marine Compression—Ignition Engines At or Above 30 Liters per Cylinder

Abstract: Category 3 marine diesel engines (those with per cylinder displacement greater than 30 liters) are very large

engines that are used for propulsion power in ocean-going vessels. Emissions from these engines contribute significantly to

unhealthful levels of ambient particulate matter and ozone in many parts of the United States. These engines are highly mobile

and are not easily controlled at a state or local level. EPA currently regulates emissions from Category 3 marine diesel engines

on ships flagged in the United States. This rulemaking will consider long-term nitrogen oxides (NOx) standards for new Category

3 marine diesel engines that would require the use of high efficiency aftertreatment technology. We are considering standards

equivalent to the limits for NOx recently adopted by the International Maritime Organization, which are based on the position

advanced by the United States Government as part of the international negotiations. We are also considering a revision to our

diesel fuel program under the Act to allow for the manufacture and sale of marine diesel fuel with a sulfur content up to 1,000

ppm for use in Category 3 engines. The proposal would be part of a coordinated strategy, the other components of which would

consist of the new amendments to MARPOL Annex VI that will extend these standards to foreign vessels (through the Act to

Prevent Pollution from Ships) and pursuing Emission Control Area (ECA) designation for U.S. coastal areas in accordance with

MARPOL Annex VI. Implementation of this coordinated strategy will ensure that all ships that affect U.S. air quality meet

stringent NOx and fuel sulfur requirements. A recent D.C. Circuit decision (February 2009) upheld EPA's deadline of 12/17/09

based on EPA's commitment in the regulation to meet that deadline for the final Category 3 rule. EPA finalized this rule on

December 18, 2009.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1042; 40 CFR 1065; 40 CFR 94; 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7547; 42 USC 7545

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial 12/17/2009 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 12/07/2007 72 FR 69521 

NPRM 08/28/2009 74 FR 44441 

Final Action 04/30/2010 75 FR 22895 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0121

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/otaq/oceanvessels.htm

Agency Contact: Jean Revelt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

OAR/OTAQ/ASD

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4822 

FAX: 734 214-4050

E-Mail: revelt.jean-marie@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Michael Samulski Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

USEPA

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

225
Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4532 

E-Mail: Samulski.Michael@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO42

 View Related Documents

Title: Review of New Source Performance Standards—Portland Cement

Abstract: As of July 27, 2010 this action has been combined into NESHAP: Portland Cement Notice of Reconsideration, RIN

2060-AO15, SAN 4585.1

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 subpart F (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 111

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Court ordered deadline 05/31/2008 

Other Judicial Court ordered deadline, 60-day extension granted 06/06/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/16/2008 73 FR 34072 

Extension of Comment Period 08/13/2008 73 FR 47119 

Withdrawn 09/01/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064806286b4; EPA Docket information: EPA–

HQ–OAR–2007–0877

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32731

Agency Contact: Keith Barnett Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5605 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: Barnett.Keith@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2837 

FAX: 919 541-4991

E-Mail: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO48

 View Related Documents

Title: Review of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to review and, if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria for the primary

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

226
(health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On May 22, 1996,

EPA published a final decision that revisions of the primary and secondary NAAQS for Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) were not

appropriate at that time, aside from several minor technical changes. That action provided the Administrator's final

determination, after careful evaluation of comments received on the November 1994 proposal, that significant revisions to the

primary and secondary NAAQS for SO2 would not be made at that time. In 2006, EPA's Office of Research and Development

initiated the current periodic review of SO2 air quality criteria, the scientific basis for the NAAQS, with a call for information in

the Federal Register. Subsequently, the decision was made to separate the reviews of the primary and secondary SO2

standards, and to combine the SO2 secondary-standard review with the secondary-standard review of Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)

due to their linkage in terms of effects and atmospheric chemistry. That joint review of the SO2 and NO2 secondary standards

is part of a separate regulatory action described elsewhere in this Regulatory Plan under the identifying number (RIN) 2060-

AO72. The regulatory action described here is for the Agency's review of the primary SO2 NAAQS. This review includes the

preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment, Risk/Exposure Assessment, and a Policy Assessment. These documents

were reviewed by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee and the public. These documents inform the Administrator's

proposed decision as to whether to retain or revise the standards. A final rule was published in the Federal Register (75 FR

35520) on June 22, 2010. The final rule is effective on August 23, 2010. EPA is revising the primary SO2 NAAQS to provide

requisite protection of public health with an adequate margin of safety. Specifically, EPA is establishing a new 1-hour SO2

standard at a level of 75 parts per billion based on the 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of 1-hour daily maximum

concentrations. EPA is also revoking both the existing 24-hour and annual primary SO2 standards.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 11/16/2009 

Other Judicial 06/02/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/08/2009 74 FR 64810 

NPRM Comment Period End 02/08/2010 

Final Action 06/22/2010 75 FR 35519 

Final Action Effective 08/23/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a666ec; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2007-0352

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/so2/s_so2_index.html

Agency Contact: Michael Stewart Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-7524 

FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: stewart.michael@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5274 

FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

227
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO71

 View Related Documents

Title: Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Alternative Affirmative Defense Requirements for Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel and

Gasoline Benzene Technical Amendment

Abstract: This rule provides flexibility to refiners, importers and distributors of diesel fuel by amending the ultra-low sulfur

diesel (ULSD) regulations to allow a nationwide sampling and testing program to be used as an alternative means of meeting

the sampling and testing defense elements under 40 CFR section 80.613. This alternative method would consist of a

comprehensive program of quality assurance sampling and testing calculated to achieve the same objectives as the current

regulatory quality assurance requirement; i.e. that the sulfur content in ULSD does not exceed regulatory limits. This rule also

amended the gasoline benzene regulations to allow disqualified small refiners the same opportunity to generate gasoline

benzene credits as that afforded to non-small refiners and this proposed and final rule was finalized on May 3, 2010.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 211

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/11/2010 75 FR 26165 

Direct Final Action 05/11/2010 75 FR 26121 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-1158

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Jaimee Dong Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6406J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9672 

FAX: 202 343-2802

E-Mail: Dong.Jaimee@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO92

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chromium Electroplating, Chromium Anodizing, and Steel

Pickling Residual Risk and Technology Review

Abstract: As of July 28, 2010 this action has been combined into RIN 2060-AO91, Risk and Technology Review - Marine

Tank Vessel Loading, Pharmaceutical Production and Printing and Publishing - Bin 1, SAN 5093.2.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA sec 112(f)(2); CAA sec 112(d)(6)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 07/29/2010 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AN85.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

228
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3364; 3313; 32731; 3314; 32411; 331492; 22132

Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5289 

FAX: 919 541-3207

E-Mail: mulrine.phil@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 919 541-2837 

FAX: 919 541-4991

E-Mail: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP29

 View Related Documents

Title: Transportation Conformity PM2.5 and PM10 Amendments

Abstract: The final rule for transportation conformity rule ensures that transportation planning is consistent with a state's plan

for achieving air quality standards. These technical amendments would clarify (1) how certain highway and transit projects meet

statutory conformity requirements for particulate matter, to respond to a December 2007 court ruling, and (2) how to implement

conformity requirements in light of the revocation of the October 17, 2006 revisions to the PM10 and 24-hour PM2.5 standards.

This rule was finalized on March 10, 2010.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 93 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 176(c); 42 USC 7506(c)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory CAA gives new areas 1 year before conformity applies, from effective

date of designation (3/09). Rule needed for new areas. 03/01/2009 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/15/2009 74 FR 23024 

Final Action 03/24/2010 75 FR 14259 

Final Action Effective 04/21/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2009/May/Day15/a11184.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0540

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Laura Berry Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

AASMCG

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4858 

E-Mail: Berry.Laura@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Patty Klavon Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

229
Air and Radiation

AASMCG

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4476 

E-Mail: klavon.patty@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP58

 View Related Documents

Title: EPA/NHTSA Joint Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average

Fuel Economy Standards

Abstract: EPA finalized plans to set national emissions standards under section 202 (a) of the Clean Air Act to control

greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from passenger cars and light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles, as part of a

joint rulemaking with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). This joint rulemaking effort was announced by

President Obama on May 19, 2009. EPA and NHTSA published a joint Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register

on September 28, 2009. The GHG standards would significantly reduce the GHG emissions from these light-duty vehicles. The

standards will be phased in beginning with the 2012 model year through model year 2016. The joint final rule is expected to be

signed by EPA and NHTSA by March 31, 2010. EPA's final action follows EPA's final findings, published December 15, 2009,

that emissions of greenhouse gases may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, and that emissions

from new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines contribute to the atmospheric concentrations of these greenhouse gases

and hence to the threat of climate change. This rule was finalized on April 1, 2010.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86 and 600 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 202(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/28/2009 74 FR 49453 

Final Action 05/07/2010 75 FR 25323 

Final Action Effective 07/06/2010 

Additional Information: Related to RIN 2127–AK90; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Related RINs: Related to 2127-AK50

Agency Contact: Robin Moran Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

ASD

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4781 

FAX: 734 214-4816

E-Mail: Moran.Robin@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Chris Lieske Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

ASD

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4584 

FAX: 734 214-4816

E-Mail: lieske.christopher@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP59

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

230
 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Allocation of Essential Use Allowances for Calendar Year 2010

Abstract: This rule allocates essential use allowances for the import and production of Class I ozone depleting substances for

2010. Essential use allowances enable a person to produce or import controlled Class I ozone depleting substances under the

essential use exemption to the regulatory phaseout of these chemicals, which became effective on January 1, 1996. The

production of these chemicals was phased out internationally due to their harmful effects on the earth's ozone layer. EPA has

promulgated rules to allocate new production under this exemption since the 1996 phase out. The essential users under this

rulemaking are manufacturers of important medical devices such as asthma inhalers.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/11/2009 74 FR 65719 

Final Action 05/10/2010 75 FR 25780 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a6928e; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR -2009-0566

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/exemptions/essential.html

Sectors Affected: 3254

Agency Contact: Jeremy Arling Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9055 

FAX: 202 343-2338

E-Mail: Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ross Brennan Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9226 

E-Mail: Brennan.Ross@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP62

 View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2010 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide

Abstract: This action authorizes uses that qualify for the 2010 critical use exemption from the phaseout of methyl bromide,

and authorizes the amount of methyl bromide that may be produced, imported, or supplied from inventory for those uses in 2010.

EPA took this action under the authority of the Clean Air Act to reflect consensus Decisions taken by the Parties to the Montreal

Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer at the 20th Meeting of the Parties. The Parties have approved critical use

methyl bromide every year since the phaseout in 2005. Since this rulemaking confers a benefit by exempting the production and

use of a phased-out chemical, there is no significant adverse impact on small entities.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

231
Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671c(d)(6)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/23/2009 74 FR 61078 

Final Action 05/03/2010 75 FR 23167 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a5c83b; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2009-0351

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr

Agency Contact: Jeremy Arling Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6205J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9055 

FAX: 202 343-2338

E-Mail: Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP78

 View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality Designations for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Abstract: This action will establish initial air quality designations for all areas of the United States under the revised 2008

lead NAAQS. Designations of attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable are based upon air quality monitoring data and other

relevant information pertaining to the air quality in the affected area, including whether an area contributes to a violation of the

standard in a nearby area. EPA is required to make the final initial designations no later than 2 years from the October 15, 2008

promulgation of the revised NAAQS, although EPA can extend this deadline by up to 1 year if necessary to gather additional

information. Therefore, the EPA will finalize a first round of designations by 11/00/10, and will complete a second round in

11/00/11 to consider additional data being collected from the expanded lead monitoring network promulgated with the final lead

NAAQS.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA sec 107(d), 42 USC 7407(d)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory CAA requires EPA to issue designations no later than 2 years from the

10/15/08 promulgation of the revised lead NAAQS. 10/15/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 11/22/2010 75 FR 71033 

Final Rule Effective 12/31/2010 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0443

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

232
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Rhonda Wright Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27709 

Phone: 919 541-1087 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: Wright.Rhonda@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2940 

FAX: 919 541-0824

E-Mail: Jones.Rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP86

 View Related Documents

Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration/Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule

Abstract: With this action, EPA applies a tailored approach to the applicability major source thresholds for greenhouse gases

under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and title V programs of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) by raising those

thresholds. EPA is has issued this rulemaking because greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will become subject to regulation

pursuant to the CAA as of January 2, 2011. One consequence of our subjecting GHG emissions to regulatory controls is that

the requirements of existing air permit programs, namely the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) preconstruction

permitting program for major stationary sources and the title V operating permits program, would be triggered for GHG emission

sources. At the statutory applicability levels under the CAA, tens of thousands of projects every year would need permits under

the PSD program, and millions of sources would become subject to the title V program. These numbers of permits are orders of

magnitude greater than the current number of permits under these permitting programs and would vastly exceed the

administrative capacity of the permitting authorities. By tailoring the applicability thresholds, this rule allows actions to be taken

by EPA and states to build capacity and streamline permitting.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51, 52, 70, and 71 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act title I

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 08/05/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/27/2009 74 FR 55292 

NPRM Comment Period End 12/28/2009 

Final Action 06/03/2010 75 FR 31514 

Final Action Effective 08/02/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a4c6ba; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2009-0517

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

233
Agency Contact: Joseph Mangino Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-9778 

FAX: 919 685-3105

E-Mail: Mangino.Joseph@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Juan Santiago Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1084 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: santiago.juan@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP91

 View Related Documents

Title: Requirements for Control Technology Determinations for Major Sources in Accordance With Clean Air Act Sections,

Sections 112(g) and 112(j)

Abstract: As required by Clean Air Act section 112(j), in cases where EPA fails to promulgate a Maximum Achievable Control

Technology (MACT) standard for a major source category, the owner or operator of a source in that category must obtain an

operating permit with case-by-case emission limitations determined to be equivalent to MACT. EPA's program for implementing

this requirement is codified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart B. In this action, we are revising subpart B to address the process for

obtaining case-by-case MACT determinations in the case of standards vacatur. We are also reformatting the rule to streamline

it and make it easier to understand. There has been significant confusion from permitting authorities on how this program works

in the case of vacaturs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA Sec 112

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/30/2010 75 FR 15655 

NPRM Comment Period End 04/29/2010 

Final Action 04/29/2010 75 FR 22548 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480acc241

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Brian Stitt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D205-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3757 

E-Mail: stitt.brian@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D205-02

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5060 

FAX: 919 541-5600

E-Mail: conner.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

234
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP95

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Group I Polymers and Resins

Abstract: As of July 28, 2010 this action has been combined into RIN 2060-AO91, Risk and Technology Review - Marine

Tank Vessel Loading, Pharmaceutical Production and Printing and Publishing - Bin 1.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA301

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Potential settlement date. 05/31/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 07/28/2010 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5389.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Mary Kissell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-4516 

FAX: 919 685-3219

E-Mail: Kissell.Mary@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Ken Hustvedt Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

E143-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5395 

FAX: 919 685-3200

E-Mail: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ03

 View Related Documents

Title: Regulation To Establish Mandatory Reporting of GHGs From Industrial Landfills, Wastewater, Underground Coal Mines,

and Magnesium Production

Abstract: On October 30, 2009, EPA finalized a rule establishing GHG reporting requirements for approximately 10,000

facilities and suppliers in the U.S. (74 FR 56260). There were a few source categories originally included in the proposed rule

(74 FR 16448) that were not included in the final rule promulgated in October in order to provide EPA more time to review and

respond to the comments. Several of those delayed source categories are being re-proposed in separate actions. After further

review of the comments, we determined that four of the remaining source categories, Industrial Wastewater, Industrial Landfills,

Underground Coal Mines, and Magnesium Production, do not need to be re-proposed but rather we are responding to the

comments and going final with those subparts in this action.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

235
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 07/12/2010 75 FR 39736 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5242.1; EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-

5711.pdf; Split from RIN 2060-AO79; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AO79

Agency Contact: Rachel Schmeltz Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6207J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9124 

E-Mail: Schmeltz.rachel@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Carole Cook Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6207J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9334 

E-Mail: Cook.Carole@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ12

 View Related Documents

Title: Tier II Light-Duty Vehicle and Light-Duty Truck Emission Standards and Gasoline Sulfur Standards

Abstract: On February 10, 2000 (65 FR 6698), EPA promulgated a regulation to require emission standards for light-duty

vehicles and light-duty trucks through lowering tailpipe emission standards. Specifically, EPA sought to reduce emissions of

nitrogen oxides and non-methane hydrocarbons, pollutants which contribute to ozone pollution. The rulemaking also provided

limitations on the sulfur content of gasoline available nationwide. Sulfur in gasoline has a detrimental impact on catalyst

performance and could be a limiting factor in the introduction of advanced technologies on motor vehicles. Pursuant to section

610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, on February 19, 2010, EPA initiated a review of this rule to determine if it should be

continued without change, or should be rescinded or amended to minimize adverse economic impacts on small entities (75 FR

7426). EPA has solicited comments on, the following factors: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of complaints or

comments received concerning the rule; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or

conflicts with other Federal, State, or local government rules; and (5) the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or

other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. No relevant comments were received, and EPA has concluded that

the rule needs no revisions at this time to minimize impacts on small entities. See EPA's report summarizing the results of this

review in the docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0052. This docket can be accessed at www.regulations.gov.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80, 85, 86 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 5 USC 610

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 02/10/2000 65 FR 6698 

Begin Review 02/19/2010 75 FR 7426 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

236
End Comment Period 03/22/2010 

End Review 06/11/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final Action - http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?

dbname=2000_register&docid=page+6697-6746.pdf; Related to RIN 2060-AI23; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-

0052

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Tad Wysor Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

USEPA

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4332 

FAX: 734 214-4816

E-Mail: Wysor.Tad@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Tom Eagles Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6103A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1952 

FAX: 202 564-1554

E-Mail: Eagles.Tom@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ13

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines—Existing

Stationary Spark Ignition (Gas-Fired)

Abstract: The action establishes NESHAP for existing stationary spark ignition (gas-fired) RICE that are either located at

area sources of HAP or are 500 HP or less and located at major sources of HAP. EPA has previously promulgated NESHAP for

new stationary RICE located at major sources of HAP emissions, existing stationary spark ignition (gas-fired) engines that have

a site rating of greater than 500 brake hp and are located at major sources of HAP emissions, and new stationary RICE located

at area sources of HAP emissions.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412(d)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial Consent decree for NESHAP for existing engines <500 HP at major

source and existing all HP at area source 08/10/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/05/2009 74 FR 9698 

NPRM Comment Period End 05/04/2009 

Final Action 08/20/2010 75 FR 51569 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final Action - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-20298.pdf;

Split from RIN 2060-AP36; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Melanie King Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

237
Air and Radiation

D243-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-2469 

E-Mail: king.melanie@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robert Wayland Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

D243-01

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-1045 

FAX: 919 541-5450

E-Mail: Wayland.RobertJ@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ14

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Area Source Standards for Paints and Allied Products

Manufacturing; Direct Final

Abstract: Section 112 (k) of the Clean Air Act requires the development of standards for area sources that account for 90%

of the emissions in urban areas of the 30 urban hazardous air pollutants (HAP) listed in the Integrated Urban Air Toxics

Strategy. The Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy lists paints and allied products manufacturing as an area source category.

This action will revise the definition of target HAP-containing material to add, "or greater than 1.0 percent for noncarcinogens."

The definition already indicates that target HAP-containing material includes carcinogens present in amounts greater than 0.1

percent. The level for noncarcinogens was inadvertently omitted from the rule. Inclusion of 1.0 percent and 0.1 percent levels for

noncarcinogens and carcinogens, respectively, is consistent with the TRI and OSHA Hazard Communications levels and other

recent area source rules.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec112

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 06/03/2010 75 FR 31317 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Direct Final Action -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#searchResults?

Ne=11+8+8053+8098+8074+8066+8084+1&Ntt=501.2&Ntk=All&Ntx=mode+matchall&N=0; Split from RIN 2060-AN47; EPA

Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0053

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Melissa Payne Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C404-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-3609 

FAX: 919 541-0242

E-Mail: payne.melissa@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Chebryll Edwards Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C404-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5428 

FAX: 919 541-0242

E-Mail: Edwards.Chebryll@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

238
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ15

 View Related Documents

Title: Minor Harmonizing Changes to General Provisions of the GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule

Abstract: This action was finalized in the rule that was published on July 14, 2010 (75 FR 39736). It made minor harmonizing

changes to the general provisions for the greenhouse gas reporting rule (40 CFR part 98, subpart A) to accommodate the

addition of source categories not included in the 2009 final rule. This included subparts proposed in April 2009 but not finalized

in 2009, and any new subparts that may be proposed in the future. The rule updated 40 CFR 98.2(a) on rule applicability and 40

CFR 98.3 regarding the reporting schedule to accommodate any additional subparts and the schedule for their reporting

obligations (e.g., source categories finalized in 2010 would not begin reporting until 2011 and reporting in 2012).

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 03/16/2010 75 FR 12451 

NPRM 03/16/2010 75 FR 12489 

Withdrawal of Direct Final Rulemaking 04/30/2010 75 FR 22699 

Final Action 07/14/2010 75 FR 39736 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480abe53b; Final rule published through RIN

2060-AQ03; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Agency Contact: Suzanne Kocchi Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6207J

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9387 

E-Mail: Kocchi.Suzanne@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lisa Hanle Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9434 

E-Mail: hanle.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ18

 View Related Documents

Title: Technical Amendments for Marine Spark-Ignition Engines and Vessels

Abstract: In the final rulemaking for new exhaust and evaporative emissions standards for nonroad spark-ignition engines,

vessels, and equipment (73 FR 59034, October 8, 2008), EPA established first-ever evaporative emissions standards for marine

vessels. For one small subset of marine fuel tanks (portable tanks), further evaluation of the design standard for diurnal

emissions has raised a concern that fuel spillage may occur under certain circumstances. We have engaged the industry to

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

239
identify a simple, safe, and emissions neutral solution to this issue. The purpose of this action is to make technical amendments

to the design standard for portable tanks that will allow for this solution. In addition, we also intend to incorporate safe

recommended practices, developed through industry consensus, for portable marine fuel tanks.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1045; 40 CFR 1060; 40 CFR 1068 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA 213(a)(3)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 09/16/2010 75 FR 56477 

NPRM 09/16/2010 75 FR 56491 

Comment Period End 11/15/2010 

Additional Information: Related to RIN 2060–AM34; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0270

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Michael Samulski Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

USEPA

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4532 

E-Mail: Samulski.Michael@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Glenn Passavant Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

USEPA

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4408 

E-Mail: Passavant.Glenn@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ21

 View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the New Source Review Program for Particulate Matter (PM) Less Than 2.5 Micrometers—Final Rule

to End NSR Transition Period for Condensable PM

Abstract: EPA is withdrawing this action because EPA is announcing in the final under SAN 5147 titled "Methods for

Measurement of Filterable PM10 and PM2.5 and Measurement of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions from Stationary

Sources" that we will not be revising its major New Source Review (NSR) regulations to replace the originally-announced date

for ending the NSR transition period for condensable particulate matter (CPM) with an earlier closing date. The NSR transition

period was scheduled to remain in effect from July 15, 2008 until January 1, 2011, or an earlier date depending on EPA’s final

action to revise the test methods for measuring stack concentrations of CPM. Now that the expected effective date for the test

method is approaching January 1, 2011, the scheduled closing date of the NSR transition period, there is no longer a practical

need to address the issue of shortening the NSR transition period.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 app M (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act, 42 USC 7401 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM Comment Period End 03/29/2009 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

240
NPRM 03/25/2009 74 FR 12969 

Withdrawn 04/15/2010 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO58; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-QAR-2008-0348

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Agency Contact: Dan Deroeck Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5593 

FAX: 919 685-3009

E-Mail: Deroeck.Dan@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-03

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5344 

FAX: 919 541-5509

E-Mail: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ26

 View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Area Source Standards for Prepared Feeds Manufacturing–

Amendment

Abstract: Section 112(k) of the Clean Air Act requires the development of standards for area sources that account for 90

percent of the emissions in urban areas of the 30 urban hazardous air pollutants (HAP) listed in the Integrated Urban Air Toxics

Strategy. The Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy lists prepared feeds manufacturing as an area source category. Accordingly,

a final NESHAP for this industry was published on January 5, 2010. This action made amendments and clarifications to the

regulatory text of that final rule. The amendments corrected errors and inadvertent omissions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA 112

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 07/20/2010 75 FR 41991 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO98; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0080

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 311119

Agency Contact: Jan King Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C404-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5665 

FAX: 919 541-0242

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

241
E-Mail: King.Jan@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Chebryll Edwards Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C404-05

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5428 

FAX: 919 541-0242

E-Mail: Edwards.Chebryll@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ35

 View Related Documents

Title: Supplemental Determination for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Canola Oil

Abstract: As indicated in the final rule for the Renewable Fuels Standard Program, while the Agency issued lifecycle

greenhouse gas (GHG) threshold determinations for the major fuel pathways projected to meet the bulk of the RFS volume

mandates, assessments of other new fuel pathways such as biodiesel from canola could not be completed in time for the final

rule. In the process of assessing these fuels, the Agency is issuing determinations through several supplemental notices to the

final rule. For this supplemental notice, EPA plans to publish a final determination for biomass-based diesel produced from

canola oil. The Agency will issue a Direct Final Notice of Supplemental Determination in mid-September.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86, 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 211(o)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 12/19/2008 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action Effective 09/28/2010 

Direct Final Action 09/28/2010 75 FR 59622 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO81; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ– OAR–2005–0161

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/index.htm

Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6520J ARN

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1123 

FAX: 202 564-1686

E-Mail: Argyropoulos.Paul@epa.gov

Agency Contact: David Korotney Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C99

Ann Arbor , MI 48105 

Phone: 734 214-4507 

FAX: 734 14-4018

E-Mail: Korotney.David@epamail.epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

242
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ50

 View Related Documents

Title: Reconsideration of the 2008 Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone

Abstract: On March 12, 2008, EPA announced the final decision on the ozone national ambient air quality standards

(NAAQS). Soon after that decision was signed on 3/27/08 (73 FR 16436), the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)

held an unsolicited public meeting and criticized EPA for setting primary and secondary standards that were not consistent with

advice provided by the CASAC during review of the NAAQS. On 7/25/08, several environmental and industry petitioners, as well

as a number of States, sued EPA on the NAAQS decision, and the Court set a briefing schedule for the consolidated cases on

12/23/08. On 3/10/09, EPA requested that the Court vacate the briefing schedule and hold the consolidated cases in abeyance

for 180 days. This request for extension was made to allow time for appropriate EPA officials appointed by the new

Administration to determine whether the standards established in March 2008 should be maintained, modified or otherwise

reconsidered. This action has been combined with the Reconsideration of the 2008 Primary Ozone NAAQS (2060-AP98).

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: None (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/19/2010 75 FR 2938 

NPRM Comment Period End 03/22/2010 

Merged With RIN 2060-AP98 10/04/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a7f618; Combined with RIN 2060-AP98.

Related to RIN 2060-AN24; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html

Agency Contact: Dave Mckee Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5288 

FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: Mckee.Dave@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C504-06

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5274 

FAX: 919 541-0237

E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ52

 View Related Documents

Title: Extension of Deadline for Action on Section 126 Petition From New Jersey

Abstract: In this procedural action, EPA extended by six additional months the deadline for taking action on a petition

submitted by New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection under section 126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Section 126

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

243
requires EPA to grant or deny a petition within 60 days. The petition was received on May 13, 2010 – this provided us with a

July 12, 2010 deadline. However, the CAA authorizes EPA to grant a time extension of up to 6 months for responding to a

petition if EPA that the extension is necessary, among other things, to meet the purposes of the CAA’s rulemaking

requirements. Actions under section 126 are subject to notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements. EPA determined that the

60-day time period was not sufficient for EPA to develop an adequate proposal on the petition and to allow for public input on

the proposal. As a result of this extension, the deadline for EPA to act on the petition is January 12, 2011.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: CAA sec 307(d)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory The petition was received on 5/13/10. Section 126 requires EPA to

grant or deny within 60 days. 01/12/2011 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 07/12/2010 75 FR 39633 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final Action -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b17769; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2010-0473

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Gobeail McKinley Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5246 

FAX: 919 685-3700

E-Mail: McKinley.Gobeail@epamail.epa.gov

Agency Contact: Todd Hawes Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

C539-04

Research Triangle Park , NC 27711 

Phone: 919 541-5591 

FAX: 919 685-3190

E-Mail: Hawes.Todd@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ04

 View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Inventory Nomenclature for Enzymes and Proteins

Abstract: In an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) issued in November 2004, EPA announced and sought

comment on whether it should establish new procedures and regulations for naming enzymes and proteins when listing such

substances on the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Chemical Substances Inventory (TSCA Inventory) because current

enzyme listings were too broad and did not adequately differentiate between newly developed enzymes and existing Inventory

listings. The ANPRM outlined four identification elements that EPA currently believes are appropriate for use in developing

unique TSCA Inventory nomenclature for proteinaceous enzymes. The Agency also solicited public comment on several specific

questions relating to this topic. EPA is currently evaluating the comments received and is developing a proposed rulemaking.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720.45 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

244
Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 11/15/2004 69 FR 65565 

NPRM 10/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0058

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/

Sectors Affected: 325; 324

Agency Contact: Greg Fritz Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8583 

FAX: 202 564-9490

E-Mail: fritz.greg@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Loraine Passe Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7406M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-9064 

E-Mail: passe.loraine@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ08

 View Related Documents

Title: Certain Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs); Test Rule and Significant New Use Rule (SNUR)

Abstract: The Agency is developing two simultaneous proposed rulemaking actions which it committed to take in the

Chemical Action Plan for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) released on December 30, 2009. In the first action, the

Agency intends to propose amending the existing PBDE SNUR to require manufacturers and importers of the subject PBDEs to

submit a significant new use notice (SNUN) to EPA before they can begin manufacturing, importing, or processing a PBDE

subject to the SNUR. In the second action, EPA intends to propose a test rule to require anyone who manufactures, imports, or

processes pentaBDE, octaBDE, or decaBDE after the relevant effective dates to conduct testing to obtain specific data on

health effects, environmental effects, and chemical fate. PBDEs are a family of chemicals with a common structure of a

brominated diphenyl ether molecule which may have anywhere from one to ten bromine atoms attached. PBDEs have been

widely used as flame retardants in a number of applications: c-pentaBDE was used primarily as an additive flame retardant in

flexible polyurethane foams; c-OctaBDE was used in acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) plastic which was used as casing for

certain electric and electronic devices used in both offices and homes. Domestic manufacture of c-pentaBDE and c-octaBDE

ceased in 2004 when the Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (now Chemtura Corporation) voluntary phased out their production.

In 2006 EPA promulgated a SNUR designating manufacture or import of any of six PBDEs (tetraBDE, pentaBDE, hexaBDE,

heptaBDE, octaBDE, and nonaBDE) a significant new use. The 2006 SNUR does not address processing or the importation of

articles containing the six PBDEs, and does not address a seventh PBDE, decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE), which is still

manufactured and widely used in the United States. On December 17, 2009, as the result of negotiations with EPA, the two

U.S. producers of decaBDE, Albemarle Corporation and Chemtura Corporation, and the largest U.S. importer, ICL Industrial

Products, Inc., announced commitments to phase out production, and importation of decaBDE for most uses in the United

States by December 31, 2012, and to end all uses by the end of 2013.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721; 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

245
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/25/1991 56 FR 29140 

NPRM2 03/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0357

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest,

http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/pbde.html

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Agency Contact: Catherine Roman Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8172 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: Roman.Catherine@epa.gov

Agency Contact: John Bowser Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8082 

E-Mail: bowser.john@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ26

 View Related Documents

Title: Prions; Amendment of EPA’s Regulatory Definition of Pests to Include Prion

Abstract: In 2004, the Agency stated that it considered prions (proteinaceous infectious particles) to be a "pest" under

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). A product intended to inactivate, destroy or mitigate prions on

inanimate surfaces (i.e., “prion product”) is considered to be a pesticide. Any company seeking to distribute or sell such a

product is required to register the product with EPA unless the product is exempt from registration requirements before it can be

distributed or sold in the United States. Through this action, EPA is considering expressly adding prions to the list of pests in 40

CFR part 152, and requirements related to product performance (i.e., efficacy data), which is required for each antimicrobial

end-use product for which public health related claims are made. EPA believes that regulating prion products protects human

health and the environment against unreasonable adverse effects and ensures that such products are effective.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.5(d) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136; 7 USC 136w

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0427

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/

Agency Contact: Carlton Kempter Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

246
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7510P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-5448 

FAX: 703 308-6467

E-Mail: kempter.carlton@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Tajah Blackburn Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7510P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-0372 

E-Mail: Blackburn.Tajah@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ27

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Data Requirements for Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) and Certain Exemptions for PIPs

Abstract: EPA will propose codifying data requirements that specifically address the registration data needs of plantincorporated protectants (PIPs). These data requirements are intended to provide EPA with data and other information

necessary for the registration of a PIP or the issuance of an experimental use permit for a PIP. These requirements would

improve the Agency’s ability to make regulatory decisions about the human health and environmental effects of these products.

By codifying data requirements specific to PIPs, the regulated community would have a better understanding of and could better

prepare for the PIP registration process. This proposed rule is one in a series of proposals to update and clarify pesticide data

requirements. In general, pesticide data requirements are codified in 40 CFR part 158, which describes the minimum data and

information EPA typically requires to support an application for pesticide registration or amendment; support the maintenance of

a pesticide registration by means of the data call-in process, e.g., as used in the registration review program; or establish or

maintain a tolerance or exemption from the requirements of a tolerance for a pesticide chemical residue. This part establishes

general policies and procedures associated with the submission of data in support of a pesticide regulatory action. It does not,

however, include study protocols, methodology, or standards for conducting or reporting test results; nor does this part describe

how the Agency uses or evaluates the data and information in its risk assessment and risk management decisions, or the

regulatory determinations that may be based upon the data. Also, EPA will propose to exempt cisgenic PIPs from registration to

encourage research and development of useful biotechnology and reduce the number of PIPs seeking registration. Cisgenic

PIPs are formed when genetic material is transferred, using bioengineering technology, between plants that could transfer the

genetic material naturally.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152, 158, and 174 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 to 136y; 21 USC 346a

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0499

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/pips/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 32532

Agency Contact: Rose Kyprianou Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-5354 

FAX: 703 305-5884

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

247
E-Mail: Kyprianou.Rose@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Chris Wozniak Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7511P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-4043 

FAX: 703 308-7026

E-Mail: wozniak.chris@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ32

 View Related Documents

Title: Regulations To Facilitate Compliance With the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act by Producers of

Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs)

Abstract: Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) are pesticidal substances intended to be produced and used in living plants

and the genetic material needed for their production. EPA regulates PIPs under Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide

Act (FIFRA) and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), including issuing experimental use permits and

commercial registrations. In 2001, EPA published rules establishing much of the current regulatory structure for PIPs. This

rulemaking effort is intended to address the issues that were not addressed in 2001, including defining the nature of regulated

production of PIPs and associated issues such as reporting, product labeling and record keeping. The rule will affect those

persons who produce PIPs and is expected to clarify the legal requirements of their products at various production phases,

improving their ability to conduct business. It is expected to also improve the ability of the EPA to identify and respond to

instances where there are potentially significant violations. EPA also intends to address activities that the Agency does not

believe warrant regulation and will consider exempting those activities, as appropriate, from FIFRA in whole or in part.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174; 40 CFR 152; 40 CFR 156; 40 CFR 167; 40 CFR 168; 40 CFR 169; 40 CFR 172 (To search for

a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This action is needed to clarify PIP regulations for the Agency and PIP developers, producers and

farmers. Section 7 of FIFRA requires producers of pesticides to register their establishments with EPA and to submit annual

reports stating the amounts of pesticides produced at each establishment. However, neither the Act nor the regulations

promulgated under section 7 specifically address what constitutes the production of PIPs, or what units are relevant for

purposes of reporting amounts of PIPs produced. This has led to inconsistency and confusion in the registration of PIPproducing establishments and in the reporting of units of PIPs produced. Members of the PIP production industry have

indicated that they are uncertain of their legal obligations for PIPs under FIFRA section 7 and have requested guidance on

these matters. The Agency reviewed the concerns raised by industry and other stakeholders and reached the conclusion that,

because of problems inherent in the application of the current regulations to this class of pesticides known as PIPs, EPA is

unable to provide guidance. As written, the current regulations have been difficult to enforce with respect to PIPs. Ambiguity

regarding the applicability of section 7 requirements makes it difficult for EPA and regulators in States and tribes to monitor

production and subsequent distribution, sale and use of products, and can cause difficulties with respect to compliance

inspection and enforcement. State and tribal involvement in compliance oversight can be greatly complicated by a lack of clear

compliance requirements. This uncertainty may be resolved by a substantive modification of the regulations through rulemaking.

Legal Basis: EPA has regulatory authority to promulgate regulations under FIFRA sections 3(a), 8(a), 25(a), and 25(b) (7

U.S.C. 136a(a), 136f(a), 136w(a), and 136w(b)). PIPs are pesticides under FIFRA section 2 because they are introduced into

plants with the intention of "preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest...." (7 U.S.C. 136(u)). Under FIFRA section

2, any person who manufactures, prepares, compounds, propagates or processes any pesticide is a "producer." (7 U.S.C.

136(w)). FIFRA section 7 requires that producers of pesticides register the establishments where production occurs and requires

that producers report their annual production (7 U. S. C. 136e). In addition, FIFRA section 8 provides that EPA may issue

regulations requiring producers to maintain records with respect to their operations and to make such records available for

inspection (7 U. S. C. 136f). Under FIFRA section 9, appropriately credentialed inspectors have the authority to conduct

inspections at pesticide producing establishments, or other places where pesticides are being held for distribution or sale, for the

purpose of inspecting products, labels and records, and for obtaining samples (7 U. S. C. 136g). FIFRA section 3(a) states that

"[t]o the extent necessary to prevent unreasonable adverse effects on the environment, the Administrator may by regulation limit

the distribution, sale, or use in any State of any pesticide that is not registered under this Act and that is not the subject of an

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

248
experimental use permit under section 5 or an emergency exemption under section 18." FIFRA section 8(a) states that "[t]he

Administrator may prescribe regulations requiring producers, registrants, and applicants for registration to maintain such records

with respect to their operations and the pesticides and device produced as the Administrator determines are necessary for the

effective enforcement of this Act and to make the records available for inspection and copying in the same manner as provided

in [FIFRA section 8(b)] ." FIFRA section 25(a) states that "[t]he Administrator is authorized in accordance with the procedure

described in [sec. 25(a)(2) of the Act], to prescribe regulations to carry out the provisions of this Act. Such regulations shall take

into account the difference in concept and usage between various classes of pesticides, including public health pesticides, and

differences in environmental risk and the appropriate data for evaluating such risk between agricultural, nonagricultural, and

public health pesticides." FIFRA section 25(b) states that "[t]he Administrator may exempt from the requirements of this Act by

regulation any pesticide which the Administrator determines either (1) to be adequately regulated by another Federal agency, or

(2) to be of a character which is unnecessary to be subject to this Act in order to carry out the purposes of this Act."

Alternatives: Alternatives will be presented in the preamble to the proposed rule.

Costs and Benefits: The Agency is conducting an economic analysis to inform decisions for the proposed rule. Anticipated

benefits include greater certainty and transparency in terms of applicable requirements for these products. Since the proposed

rulemaking is currently still under development, information about anticipated costs is not yet available.

Risks: This rulemaking is not intended to address a specific risk associated with registered PIPs. However, facilitating

compliance with FIFRA requirements could minimize potential risks associated with inadvertent noncompliance. In addition the

rulemaking is intended to provide a means to identify and minimize risks associated with use of unregistered PIPs for

production for export.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 04/04/2007 72 FR 16312 

Notice of Public Meeting 04/11/2007 72 FR 18191 

ANPRM: Extension of Comment Period 05/23/2007 72 FR 28911 

ANPRM Comment Period End 06/13/2007 

ANPRM Comment Period Extended To 07/13/2007 

NPRM 09/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480220026; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOPP-2006-1003

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 61131; 111; 32532; 54171

Agency Contact: Stephen Howie Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7201M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-4146 

FAX: 202 564-8502

E-Mail: Howie.Stephen@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Elizabeth Milewski Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7201M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8480 

FAX: 202 564-8502

E-Mail: Milewski.Elizabeth@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ45

 View Related Documents

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

249
Title: Pesticides; Reconsideration of Exemptions for Insect Repellents

Abstract: EPA is developing rulemaking to modify the minimum risk pesticides exemption under 40 CFR 152.25(f) to exclude

personally applied insect repellents from the exemption and require an abbreviated data set for such products. EPA is taking

this action because these pesticides claim to control pests of significant public health importance.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.25 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a; 7 USC 136w

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0227

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/

Sectors Affected: 3251; 32532

Agency Contact: Kathryn Boyle Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-6304 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: Boyle.Kathryn@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Niva Kramek Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 605-1193 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: Kramek.Niva@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ46

 View Related Documents

Title: Mercury; Regulation of Use in Certain Products

Abstract: Mercury is well documented as a toxic, environmentally persistent substance that demonstrates the ability to

bioaccumulate and to be atmospherically transported on a local, regional, and global scale. In addition, mercury can be

environmentally transformed into methylmercury, which biomagnifies and is highly toxic. EPA has conducted a preliminary

analysis via the Risk-Based Prioritization of Mercury in Certain Products. By compiling data pertaining to the stated costs,

advantages, and disadvantages associated with mercury-free alternatives to certain mercury-containing products, EPA made a

preliminary judgment that effective and economically feasible alternatives exist. These products include switches,

relays/contactors, flame sensors, button cell batteries, and measuring devices (e.g., non-fever thermometers, manometers,

barometers, pyrometers, flow meters, and psychrometers/hygrometers). Therefore, EPA is evaluating whether an action (or

combination of actions) under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) is appropriate for mercury used in such products. As

appropriate, such an action(s) would involve a group(s) of these products. Specifically, EPA will determine whether the

continued use of mercury in one or more of these products would pose an unreasonable risk to human health and the

environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 750 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

250
Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Mercury is well documented as a toxic, environmentally persistent substance that demonstrates the

ability to bioaccumulate and to be atmospherically transported on a local, regional, and global scale. In addition, mercury can

be environmentally transformed into methylmercury, which biomagnifies and is highly toxic. Human health risks associated with

elemental mercury and methylmercury are well documented. Humans can be exposed from products directly to elemental

mercury vapor and indirectly through fish contaminated with methylmercury. EPA has conducted a preliminary analysis via the

Risk-Based Prioritization of Mercury in Certain Products. By compiling data pertaining to the stated costs, advantages, and

disadvantages associated with mercury-free alternatives to certain mercury-containing products, EPA made a preliminary

judgment that effective and economically feasible alternatives exist. In its initial prioritization of mercury in certain products, EPA

considered mercury's well documented toxicity, persistence, ability to bioaccumulate, ability to be environmentally transformed

into methylmercury, and its demonstrated ability to be transported globally as well as locally and the availability of effective and

economically feasible alternatives for mercury in certain products. EPA believes manufacturing, processing, use, or disposal of

elemental mercury in these products may result in significant potential for human and environmental exposures to elemental

mercury and methylmercury.

Legal Basis: EPA is evaluating whether an action (or combination of actions) under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA),

15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., is appropriate for mercury used in certain products. TSCA provides EPA with authority to require

reporting, recordkeeping, and testing requirements, and restrictions relating to chemical substances and/or mixtures.

Specifically, section 4 authorizes EPA to require testing of chemicals by manufacturers, importers, and processors where risks

or exposures of concern are found. Section 5 authorizes EPA to require prior notice by manufacturers, importers, and

processors when it identifies a "significant new use" that could result in exposures to, or releases of, a substance of concern.

Section 6 gives EPA the authority to protect against unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment from chemical

substances. If EPA finds that there is a reasonable basis to conclude that the chemical's manufacture, processing, distribution,

use or disposal presents an unreasonable risk, EPA may by rule take action to: prohibit or limit manufacture, processing, or

distribution in commerce; prohibit or limit the manufacture, processing, or distribution in commerce of the chemical substance

above a specified concentration; require adequate warnings and instructions with respect to use, distribution, or disposal;

require manufacturers or processors to make and retain records; prohibit or regulate any manner of commercial use; prohibit or

regulate any manner of disposal; and/or require manufacturers or processors to give notice of the unreasonable risk of injury,

and to recall products if required. Section 8 authorizes EPA to require reporting and recordkeeping by persons who

manufacture, import, process, and/or distribute chemical substances in commerce.

Alternatives: EPA has conducted a preliminary analysis via the Risk-Based Prioritization of Mercury in Certain Products. By

compiling data pertaining to the stated costs, advantages, and disadvantages associated with mercury-free alternatives to

certain mercury-containing products, EPA made a preliminary judgment that effective and economically feasible alternatives

exist.

Costs and Benefits: As part of the economic, exposure, and risk assessment to support the current action, EPA is

conducting a comprehensive use-substitute analysis and industry profile that will consider the costs and benefits of an action

(or combination of actions) under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Those assessments consider the costs of mercurycontaining and mercury-free alternatives and the impact that any action would have on potentially affected stakeholders,

including economic, human health, and environmental criteria.

Risks: As part of the economic, exposure, and risk assessment to support the current action, EPA is conducting a

comprehensive use-substitute analysis and industry profile that will consider the risks associated with an action (or combination

of actions) under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Those assessments consider the relative toxicity and other

considerations associated with mercury-free alternatives to mercury-containing products and the impact that any action would

have on potentially affected stakeholders, including economic, human health, and environmental criteria.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5312

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/mercury/

Agency Contact: Thomas Groeneveld Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

251
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1188 

FAX: 202 566-0469

E-Mail: groeneveld.thomas@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0514 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ47

 View Related Documents

Title: Nanoscale Materials; Test Rule for Certain Nanoscale Materials

Abstract: EPA is developing a test rule under section 4(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to require

manufacturers (defined by statute to include importers) and processors of the multiwall carbon nanotube described in

Premanufacture Notice (PMN) P-08-199, certain clays (e.g., kaolin (including halloysite) and bentonite (including

montmorillonite)), alumina, and spray-applied nanomaterials (the “chemical substances” or “chemicals”) to conduct testing for

health effects, ecological effects, and environmental fate, as well as to provide material characterization data. The resulting data

will assist EPA in understanding the effects of the substances to manage/minimize potential risk and exposure. Results will also

help with establishing a correlation between the chemical/physical properties and health and environmental effects needed to

protect the environment and the health of workers handling the substance.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5313

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 325; 324

Agency Contact: Ken Moss Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-9232 

FAX: 202 564-9490

E-Mail: moss.kenneth@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Zofia Kosim Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8733 

FAX: 202 564-9490

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

252
E-Mail: kosim.zofia@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ50

 View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Reporting of Chemical Import Data in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE)

Abstract: EPA will consult with Customs and Border Protection (CBP), in the Department of Homeland Security, about the

development of proposed regulatory revisions necessary for the implementation of electronic reporting of chemical import

information in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE). Congress has mandated participation in the International Trade

Data System (ITDS) through passage of the SAFE Port Act in October 2006. The ITDS Program is a government-wide

organizational framework managed by CBP to assist every Federal agency that has import/export responsibilities to integrate

their requirements into ACE. Participation in the ITDS Program has also been recommended by the Import Safety Working

Group (ISWG), established under Executive Order 13439 (July 18, 2007). ACE is a data warehouse being designed by CBP that

will serve as a single portal for the electronic collection and processing of all data required by any federal agency pertaining to

the importation of commodities into, and their exportation from, the U.S. After testing the electronic collection of such data in

ACE under the National Customs Automation Program (19 U.S.C. 1411; 19 C.F.R. 101.9), CBP will need to amend its

regulations to require electronic reporting by importers into ACE. Other amendments to the regulations (e.g., relating to

detention of shipments) may also be considered by CBP. For EPA, this includes amendments to related regulations under the

Toxics Substances Control Act (TSCA) and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), which impose

reporting requirements for importers and exporters of chemical substances and pesticides. Regulations regarding imports under

TSCA and FIFRA are promulgated by CBP, in consultation with EPA.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 19 CFR 12.118 to 12.127; 40 CFR 707 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2612; 7 USC 136o

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM (EPA's concurrence) 06/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5305

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.itds.gov

Agency Contact: David Giamporcaro Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7408M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8107 

E-Mail: Giamporcaro.David@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Kate Bouve Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7502P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-5032 

E-Mail: bouve.kate@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ51

 View Related Documents

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

253
Title: Mercury; Incorporation of Revised ASTM Standards Into EPA Regulations That Provide Flexibility in the Use of

Alternatives to Mercury-Containing Thermometers

Abstract: EPA plans to issue a proposed rule to update EPA regulations with the most recent versions of three ASTM

International standards to facilitate the use of alternatives to mercury-containing industrial thermometers as part of complying

with certain EPA regulations. The proposal also requests public input on the need and means to address the remaining EPA

regulations that incorporate, by reference, ASTM International standards that do not allow the use of alternatives to mercurycontaining industrial thermometers.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 49; 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 75; 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 89; 40 CFR 92; 40 CFR 93; 40 CFR

761; 40 CFR 1065 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q; 15 USC 1601 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Final Action 07/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5340

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/mercury/

Agency Contact: Robert Courtnage Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1081 

E-Mail: courtnage.robert@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Hiroshi Dodahara Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0507 

E-Mail: dodahara.hiroshi@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ52

 View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule for Glymes

Abstract: EPA is proposing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act

(TSCA) for 14 glymes. This action would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process these chemical

substances for the designated significant new uses to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing such manufacture,

import, or processing. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if

necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

254
NPRM 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0767

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/

Agency Contact: Amy Breedlove Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-9823 

E-Mail: Breedlove.Amy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Sara Hisel-McCoy Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1649 

E-Mail: hisel-mccoy.sara@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ53

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Regulation to Clarify Labeling of Pesticides for Export

Abstract: EPA is developing this proposed rule to clarify, restructure, and add specificity to existing labeling regulations for

the export of unregistered pesticide products and devices. EPA is also considering a minor new requirement for the labeling of

unregistered pesticide products and devices shipped between establishments operated by the same producer to ensure that

they are clearly marked as unregistered products intended for export in order to prevent them from inadvertently entering the

U.S. market.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed

Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 168.65 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 - 136y

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0607

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://epa.gov/compliance/monitoring/programs/fifra/importexport.html

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Vera Au Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-9069 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: Au.Vera@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

255
Agency Contact: Martha Shimkin Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-5160 

E-Mail: Shimkin.martha@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ54

 View Related Documents

Title: Nanoscale Materials; Reporting Under TSCA Section 8(a)

Abstract: Under section 8(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA is developing a proposal to establish

reporting requirements for certain nanoscale materials. This rule would propose that persons who manufacture these nanoscale

materials notify EPA of certain information including production volume, methods of manufacture and processing, exposure and

release information, and available health and safety data. The proposed reporting of these activities will provide EPA with an

opportunity to evaluate the information and consider appropriate action under TSCA to reduce any risk to human health or the

environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(a) TSCA 8(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: EPA is proposing reporting requirements under section 8(a) of TSCA for persons who are

manufacturing, importing, or processing existing nanoscale materials in commerce to collect data on these activities. The data

will help EPA to take any measures to ensure that nanoscale materials are manufactured and used in a manner that protects

against unreasonable risks to human health and the environment.

Legal Basis: Section 8(a) of TSCA authorizes the Administrator to promulgate rules, which require each person (other than

a small manufacturer, importer, or processor) who manufactures, imports, processes, or proposes to manufacture, import, or

process a chemical substance, to maintain such records and submit such reports as the Administrator may reasonably require.

Alternatives: EPA developed a voluntary Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program (NMSP) to complement and support its

regulatory activities on nanoscale materials. EPA initiated the NMSP to quickly learn about commercially available nanoscale

materials by soliciting existing data and information on a voluntary basis from manufacturers, importers, processors, and users

of nanoscale materials. In addition, the program was designed to identify and encourage use of risk management practices in

developing and commercializing nanoscale materials. In its NMSP interim report, EPA identified data gaps for existing

nanoscale material production, uses, and exposures, based on the information EPA received prior to January 2009. For

example, EPA estimated that companies provided information on only about 10 percent of the nanomaterials that may be

commercially available. EPA is proposing reporting requirements under section 8(a) of TSCA for persons who are

manufacturing, importing, or processing nanoscale materials in commerce to address some of the data gaps identified in the

NMSP interim report. EPA has not identified any other activities, including regulatory activities under TSCA that would address

data gaps for existing nanoscale materials.

Costs and Benefits: EPA has evaluated the potential costs of 8(a) reporting requirements for potential manufacturers,

importers, and processors that would be subject to the proposed rule. If an entity were to submit a notice to the Agency, the

annual burden is estimated to average 157 hours per response. This information would facilitate EPA’s evaluation of the

materials and consideration of appropriate action under TSCA to reduce any unreasonable risk to human health or the

environment.

Risks: There is a growing body of scientific evidence showing the differences that exist between nanoscale material(s) and

their non-nanoscale counterpart(s). Nanoscale materials may have different or enhanced properties--for example, electrical,

chemical, magnetic, mechanical, thermal, or optical properties--or features, such as improved hardness or strength, that are

highly desirable for applications in commercial, medical, military, and environmental sectors. These properties are a direct

consequence of small size, which results in a larger surface area per unit of volume and/or quantum effects that occur at the

nanometer scale (i.e., 1 x 10-9 meters). Small size itself can also be a desirable property of nanoscale materials that is

exploited for miniaturization of applications/processes and/or stabilization or delivery of payloads to diverse environments or

incorporation into diverse products. The properties that can make nanoscale materials desirable for commercial applications

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

256
also raise questions whether the small size of nanoscale materials or the unique or enhanced properties of nanoscale materials

may, under specific conditions, pose new or increased hazards to humans and the environment. Government, academic, and

private sector scientists in multiple countries are performing research into the environmental and human health effects of diverse

nanoscale materials, resulting in a substantial and rapidly growing body of scientific evidence. These research findings point to

the possibility for nanoscale materials to affect human health and the environment adversely. Research also indicates that not

all materials in the nanoscale size range behave differently from larger sized materials of the same substance.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010-0572

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/

Sectors Affected: 325; 324

Agency Contact: Jim Alwood Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8974 

E-Mail: Alwood.Jim@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Jessica Barkas Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 250-8880 

E-Mail: Barkas.Jessica@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ58

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Satisfaction of Data Requirements; Minor Revisions to the Procedures to Ensure Protection of Data

Submitters' Rights

Abstract: This action will revise and update EPA's existing regulations in 40 CFR part 152, subpart E. The proposal will

address changes to procedures for the protection of exclusive use and data compensation rights of individuals and entities that

submit data to the Agency in support of a pesticide registration decision (i.e., data submitters). The revisions are to

accommodate statutory and procedural changes that have occurred over the last 25 years since issuance in 1984. The revisions

would simplify the procedures, reduce burdens upon certain data submitters, and make minor changes to clarify the

requirements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152e (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/05/2010 75 FR 68297 

NPRM Comment Period End 01/04/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5382

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

257
RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/registrationkit/

Sectors Affected: 32532

Agency Contact: Cameo Smoot Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-5454 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: smoot.cameo@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ61

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Clarifying Changes to Labeling

Abstract: EPA is planning a rulemaking to make minor revisions to 40 CFR part 156, Labeling Requirements for Pesticides

and Devices. The purpose of this effort is to update the structure of the regulation and make several clarifying changes. In

addition to these planned minor revisions, EPA will solicit suggestions from stakeholders on what the Agency might consider for

future changes to the labeling regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 156 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5393

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/regulating/labels/productlabels.htm

Sectors Affected: 32532

Agency Contact: Rame Cromwell Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-9068 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: Cromwell.Rame@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Rose Kyprianou Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-5354 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: Kyprianou.Rose@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ63

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

258
 View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Reporting Requirements; Minor Revisions

Abstract: EPA is developing a proposal to make minor changes to three existing reporting requirements under the Toxic

Substances Control Act (TSCA) to reduce reporting burdens and to clarify reporting to provide for quicker review of health and

environmental data for more effective protection of public health and the environment. Specifically, the changes involve 40 CFR

790.5, entitled "Submission of Information"; 40 CFR 792.185, entitled "Reporting of Study Results"; and 40 CFR 712.28, entitled

"Forms and Instructions." The changes under consideration include the elimination of the requirement for 6 copies to be

submitted; the addition of a requirement for including "Robust Summaries" of test results with the submission of test data; and

the use of the Inventory Update Rule Form to format the submission of preliminary assessment information in response to

chemical information rules.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5401

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest/pubs/sct4rule.html

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Karen Chu Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8773 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: chu.karen@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Mike Matthiesien Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3077 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: mattheisen.mike@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ65

 View Related Documents

Title: General Exemptions From Reporting Requirements for Microorganisms; Revisions of Recipient Organisms Eligible for

Tier I and Tier II Exemptions

Abstract: In 1997, EPA promulgated a final rule under section 5 of Toxics Substances and Control Act (TSCA) to establish

the notification procedures for review of certain new microorganisms before they are introduced into commerce. ‘‘New’’

microorganisms are those formed by deliberate combinations of genetic material from organisms classified in different taxonomic

genera. This review process is designed to prevent unreasonable risk of injury to human health and the environment without

imposing unnecessary regulatory burdens on the biotechnology industry. The rule also established TSCA section 5(h)(4)

exemptions from full reporting when 10 specific microorganisms are used as the recipient microorganisms for the introduced

genetic material and placed requirements on these recipient microorganism, the introduced genetic material, and the physical

containment (40 CFR 725, subpart G). The rule also established a mechanism (40 CFR 725.67) for the public to petition the

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

259
Agency to propose additional recipient microorganisms for such exemptions. These regulations describe the appropriate

supporting information that must be submitted with the petition to provide EPA with a starting point for determining whether the

recipient should be listed as a candidate for the tiered exemption. EPA has received petitions to add two additional

microorganisms to the eligible recipient microorganisms listed in 40 CFR 725.420 (Trichoderma reesei and Bacillus

amyloliquefaciens). EPA is evaluating the information provided in these petitions. If, as result of this evaluation, EPA makes a

preliminary determination that one or both of the two microorganisms will not present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or

the environment, then EPA will propose a rule to grant the exemption petition for that microorganism(s).

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5418

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Miriam Wigginslewis Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-9373 

E-Mail: Wigginslewis.Miriam@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Greg Schweer Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8469 

FAX: 202 564-9094

E-Mail: Schweer.Greg@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ66

 View Related Documents

Title: High Production Volume Chemicals; 4th Group of Chemicals; Test Rule and Significant New Use Rule

Abstract: EPA is proposing a test rule under section 4(a)(1)(B) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and a significant

new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of TSCA for the fourth group of high production volume (HPV) chemicals identified

under the HPV Program (see RIN 2070-AD16). Of the 45 chemicals in the fourth group of HPV chemicals, currently the test rule

is expected to apply to 23 chemicals. The SNUR is expected to include the other 22 chemicals. HPV chemicals are

manufactured (including imported) in the aggregate at more than 1 million pounds on an annual basis. For the chemical

substances to which it applies, the SNUR would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process the chemical

substances for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by this proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before

commencing that activity. This required notice would provide EPA the opportunity to evaluate intended significant new uses and

associated activities before they occur and, if appropriate, to prohibit or limit those uses or activities.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

260
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5419

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Paul Campanella Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8091 

E-Mail: Campanella.Paul@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Amy Breedlove Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-9823 

E-Mail: Breedlove.Amy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ67

 View Related Documents

Title: Nanoscale Materials; Significant New Use Rule (SNUR)

Abstract: EPA is developing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act

(TSCA) for nanoscale materials. This action would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process this/these

chemical substance(s) for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by this proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90

days before commencing that activity. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended

use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs to prevent unreasonable risk to human health or the

environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604

Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: EPA is proposing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of TSCA that would

designate as a significant new use, any use of chemical substances as nanoscale materials after the proposed date of the rule.

Persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process these chemical substances for the new use after the date of the

proposed rule would be required to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. The required notification would

provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs

to prevent any unreasonable risks to human health or the environment.

Legal Basis: Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to determine that a use of a chemical

substance is a "significant new use." EPA must make this determination by rule after considering all relevant factors, including

those listed in TSCA section 5(a)(2). Once EPA determines that a use of a chemical substance is a significant new use, TSCA

section 5(a)(1)(B) requires persons to submit a significant new use notice (SNUN) to EPA at least 90 days before they

manufacture, import, or process the chemical substance for that use (15 U.S.C. 2604(a)(1)(B)).

Alternatives: Nanoscale materials based on chemical substances already on the TSCA Inventory are considered existing

chemical substances. These nanoscale materials do not require reporting as new chemical substances because they are

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

261
nanoscale forms of chemical substances already in commerce. If EPA does not use authority under 5(a)(2) of TSCA to require

notification of new uses of nanoscale materials, EPA would have to use existing chemical authority under sections 4, 6, and 8

of TSCA to gather data and address any unreasonable risks.

Costs and Benefits: EPA has evaluated the potential costs of reporting requirements for potential manufacturers,

importers, and processors that would be subject to the significant new use rule. If an entity were to submit a notice to the

Agency, the annual burden is estimated to average 95 hours per response. The required notification would provide EPA with

the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs to prevent any

unreasonable risks to human health or the environment.

Risks: There is a growing body of scientific evidence showing the differences that exist between nanoscale material(s) and

their non-nanoscale counterpart(s). Nanoscale materials may have different or enhanced properties--for example, electrical,

chemical, magnetic, mechanical, thermal, or optical properties--or features, such as improved hardness or strength, that are

highly desirable for applications in commercial, medical, military, and environmental sectors. These properties are a direct

consequence of small size, which results in a larger surface area per unit of volume and / or quantum effects that occur at the

nanometer scale (i.e., 1 x 10-9 meters). Small size itself can also be a desirable property of nanoscale materials that is

exploited for miniaturization of applications/processes and/or stabilization or delivery of payloads to diverse environments or

incorporation into diverse products. The properties that can make nanoscale materials desirable for commercial applications

also raise questions whether the small size of nanoscale materials or the unique or enhanced properties of nanoscale materials

may, under specific conditions, pose new or increased hazards to humans and the environment. Government, academic, and

private sector scientists in multiple countries are performing research into the environmental and human health effects of diverse

nanoscale materials, resulting in a substantial and rapidly growing body of scientific evidence. These research findings point to

the possibility for nanoscale materials to affect human health and the environment adversely. Research also indicates that not

all materials in the nanoscale size range behave differently from larger sized materials of the same substance.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010-0572

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/

Agency Contact: Jim Alwood Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8974 

E-Mail: Alwood.Jim@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Jessica Barkas Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 250-8880 

E-Mail: Barkas.Jessica@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ68

 View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Inventory; Clarification for Chemical Identification Describing Statutory Mixtures, Including Ceramic Materials,

Cements, and Frits for TSCA Inventory Purposes

Abstract: EPA is clarifying the guidance on chemical identification of certain statutory mixtures for purposes of the Toxics

Substances Control Act Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). For the initial reporting period that established the

TSCA Inventory, EPA developed broad listing criteria ("category listings") for the complex reaction products known as statutory

mixtures. These included ceramics, cements, and frits. Since that time, there has been inconsistent guidance for manufacturers

of such substances with regard to whether new chemical notification under section 5 of TSCA was required for such new

substances. Under this action, EPA will clarify which chemical substances comprise complex reaction products that fall under

the "category listings" and which chemical substances (not currently on the TSCA Inventory) would be considered to be "new"

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

262
chemical substances under TSCA and thus be subject to new chemical notification under TSCA section 5.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 710 to 77 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Draft Clarification 03/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5421

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: David Schutz Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-9262 

FAX: 202 564-9490

E-Mail: Schutz.David@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Greg Schweer Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8469 

FAX: 202 564-9094

E-Mail: Schweer.Greg@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ70

 View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Chemicals of Concern List Under Section 5(b)(4) of the Toxic Substances Control Act

Abstract: EPA is proposing to add a category of eight phthalates, a category of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs),

and bisphenol A (BPA) to a list of chemical substances that EPA finds present or may present an unreasonable risk of injury to

human health or the environment. EPA is proposing this rule using the authority provided under section 5(b)(4) the Toxic

Substances Control Act (TSCA). EPA is concerned that the hazards of these substances and the magnitude of human and/or

environmental exposure indicates that they may present an unreasonable risk to human health and/or the environment. EPA is

also proposing conforming changes to the TSCA 12(b) export notification regulations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed

Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 730 and 707 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 and 2611

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5430

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

263
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/managechemrisk.html

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Jessica Barkas Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 250-8880 

E-Mail: Barkas.Jessica@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Maria Doa Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0718 

E-Mail: Doa.Maria@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ71

 View Related Documents

Title: Mercury; Significant New Use Rule; Elemental Mercury Used in Barometers, Manometers, and

Hygrometers/Psychrometers

Abstract: This proposed Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) would require persons to notify EPA at least 90 days before

commencing the manufacture, import, or processing of elemental mercury for use in three types of measuring devices, namely

barometers, manometers, and hygrometers/psychrometers. Mercury is no longer used in these products (except one batterypowered, motor-aspirated psychrometer which is currently manufactured). EPA would consider a resumption of manufacture,

import, or processing of any of the three types of devices to be a significant new use. The rule does not apply to this one

psychrometer that is still manufactured. Elemental mercury in products can be released to the environment during

manufacturing, use, recycling, and/or disposal. Elemental mercury is converted to methyl mercury in the environment and is a

potent neurotoxin.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5440

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/

Sectors Affected: 334513

Agency Contact: Sue Slotnick Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1973 

E-Mail: slotnick.sue@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

264
Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0514 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ73

 View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Di-n-pentyl Phthalate (DnPP)

Abstract: EPA is proposing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act

(TSCA) for di-n-pentyl phthalate (DnPP). This proposed rule would require manufacturers and processors of DnPP to notify

EPA at least 90 days before manufacturing, importing, or processing DnPP for a significant new use. The required notice would

provide EPA the opportunity to evaluate the significant new use, and if necessary, prohibit such activity to prevent unreasonable

risk of injury to human health or the environment. DnPP was identified for potential action in EPA's Existing Chemical Action

Plan for Phthalates, released in December 2009. The most recent Inventory Update Reporting data contain no reports of this

phthalate being produced or imported into the United States.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/newchems/pubs/snun.htm

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Peter Gimlin Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0515 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: gimlin.peter@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Sara Kemme Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0511 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: kemme.sara@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ75

 View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Reporting for Health and Safety Data Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

265
Abstract: EPA is developing a proposal to facilitate the expanded use of electronic reporting under the Toxic Substances

Control Act (TSCA). This action is intended to streamline and reduce the administrative costs and burdens of submitting health

and safety data, for both industry and the EPA, by establishing standards and requirements using EPA’s Central Data Exchange

(CDX) to electronically submit health and safety data to the Agency. Specifically, EPA is developing a proposal to amend the

implementing regulations for submissions under section 4, 8(a), 8(d), and 8(e) of TSCA to facilitate the use of electronic

reporting.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 712; 40 CFR 716; 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Agency Contact: Katherine Sleasman Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-7716 

FAX: 202 564-4773

E-Mail: sleasman.katherine@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Diane Sheridan Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8176 

FAX: 202 564-4775

E-Mail: Sheridan.Diane@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ76

 View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to EPA's Rule on Protections for Subjects in Human Research Involving Pesticides

Abstract: As part of a settlement agreement, EPA will propose revisions to the existing rule governing the protection of

subjects in human research involving pesticides. The current rule, issued in 2006, provides protections for subjects in human

research by (1) prohibiting research conducted or supported by EPA that would involve intentional exposure of human subjects

who are children or pregnant or nursing women; (2) prohibiting EPA reliance in actions under the pesticide laws on research

involving intentional exposure of children or pregnant or nursing women; (3) extending the substantive requirements of the

Common Rule to the design and execution of research conducted by third-parties who intend to submit the data to EPA under

the pesticide laws; and (4) establishing the Human Studies Review Board, an independent expert panel to review proposals for

new research and reports of covered human research on which EPA proposes to rely under the pesticide laws. In settling this

litigation, EPA agreed to propose to broaden the applicability of the 2006 rule to apply to research involving intentional exposure

of a human subject to “a pesticide,” without limitation as to the regulatory statutes under which the data might be submitted,

considered, or relied upon. The new proposed rule, therefore, would apply to all research with “pesticides,” as that term is

defined in 7 U.S.C. 136(u) [Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), sec. 2(u)], submitted, considered, or

relied upon under any regulatory statute that EPA administers. EPA also committed in the settlement agreement to propose

amendments to the rule that would disallow consent by an authorized representative of a test subject and that would require the

Agency, in its reviews of covered human research, to document its ethics and science considerations in terms of the

recommendations articulated in the National Research Council’s 2004 report, Intentional Human Dosing Studies for EPA

Regulatory Purposes.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

266
Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 26 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: PL 109-54, sec 201; 5 USC 301; 42 USC 300v-1(b); 7 USC 136 to 136y; 21 USC 346a

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Settlement Agreement Deadline for the Administrator's Signature 01/18/2011 

Other Judicial Settlement Agreement Deadline for the Administrator's Signature 12/18/2011 

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: In 2006, EPA promulgated a regulation governing the protection of subjects in human research

involving pesticides. EPA settled litigation challenging the 2006 rule by promising to conduct this rulemaking.

Legal Basis: Public Law 109-54, section 201; 5 U.S.C. 301; 42 U.S.C. 300v-1(b); 7 U.S.C. 136 to 136y; 21 U.S.C. 346a

Alternatives: This action involves proposal of amendments to the 2006 rule consistent with a negotiated settlement,

followed by receipt and response to public comments and promulgation of a final rule. Because alternative educational,

voluntary, incentive-based, market-based, or other non-regulatory approaches could not resolve the legal challenge to the 2006

rule, they are not being considered. EPA retains discretion to adopt a final rule that differs from its proposal.

Costs and Benefits: Impacts are expected to be primarily procedural and limited to the costs of supporting the rulemaking

effort itself. Expected benefits from this action will result from resolution of the litigation and establishing the stability of the rules

governing regulated human research with pesticides by third parties.

Risks: Although no research is known of that would fall outside the scope of the 2006 rule but within the scope of the

proposed amendment, this action addresses a perceived loophole for unethical human pesticide research to be submitted to

EPA and relied on by the Agency under other regulatory statutes.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2011 

Final Action 12/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/guidance/human-test.htm

Agency Contact: John Carley Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7501P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-7019 

FAX: 703 308-4776

E-Mail: Carley.John@epa.gov

Agency Contact: William Jordan Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7501P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-1049 

FAX: 703 308-4776

E-Mail: Jordan.William@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ77

 View Related Documents

Title: Synchronizing the Expiration Dates of EPA Pesticide Applicator Certificates With the Underlying State or Tribal

Applicator Certificate

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

267
Abstract: Applicators of restricted-use pesticides (RUP) can be certified by States, Tribes, or non-EPA Federal agencies that

have an EPA-approved certification plan (authorized agencies). As part of a proposed Federal Plan, pesticide applicators may

be issued an EPA certificate which allows them to apply RUPs in entities not covered by an authorized agency (e.g., parts of

Indian Country) by submitting an application form and providing documentation of an existing valid certification issued by an

authorized agency, without further demonstration of competency. The EPA certificate is valid for 2 years for commercial

applicators and 3 years for private applicators, or until the expiration date of the original certificate issued by the authorized

agencies, whichever occurs first. Some authorized agencies now issue certificates that are valid for up to 5 years. Under the

current regulations, the EPA certificate may expire before the underlining certificate that it was based on expires, requiring the

applicator to resubmit the same information to renew the EPA certificate. Through this action, EPA will propose to synchronize

the expiration dates so that the EPA certificate expires at the same time as the underlying state, tribal, or non-EPA federal

certificate. This action will not involve any other substantive changes to the regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 171.11(e) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Organizations Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/safety/applicators/applicators.htm

Sectors Affected: 32532

Agency Contact: Amaris Johnson Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-9542 

FAX: 703 308-7070

E-Mail: johnson.amaris@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Nicole Zinn Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-7076 

FAX: 703 308-7070

E-Mail: zinn.nicole@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ78

 View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Benzidine-Based Dyes

Abstract: EPA is developing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act

(TSCA) for Benzidine-based Dyes. This action would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process this/these

chemical substance(s) for an activity that is designated as a significant new use to notify EPA at least 90 days before

commencing that activity. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if

necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs to prevent unreasonable risk to human health or the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

268
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/sect5a2.html

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Abeer Hashem Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-1117 

E-Mail: Hashem.Abeer@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Annette Washington Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8178 

E-Mail: Washington.Annette@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ79

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Revisions to Minimum Risk Exemptions

Abstract: EPA has determined that the current listing of active ingredients and references to inert ingredients in 40 CFR

152.25(f) should be made clearer to facilitate manufacturing processes, enforcement, and consumer choice among products. In

this action, EPA will explore options for clarifying the active and inert ingredient listings, including both rule and non-rule actions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.25 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a; 7 USC 136w

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/00/2011 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2070-AJ45.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/

Sectors Affected: 3251; 32532

Agency Contact: Niva Kramek Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 605-1193 

FAX: 703 305-5884

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

269
E-Mail: Kramek.Niva@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Kathryn Boyle Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-6304 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: Boyle.Kathryn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ80

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Clarifications for Microbial Pesticide Definitions and Applicability

Abstract: The Agency intends to propose two clarifications to text found in the Microbial Pesticides Definition and

Applicability section (40 CFR 158.2100). The first is a technical correction, replacing “part” with “subpart” in 40 CFR

158.2100(c)(1). The other clarification, involving revisions to 40 CFR 158.2100(c)(2), is in response to recent confusion over the

distinction between isolates and strains and exactly how the Agency is considering both of these terms. In conjunction with the

second change, the Agency is also developing a new microbial pesticide guideline to explain the Deposition of a Sample in a

Nationally Recognized Culture Collection data requirement, which is found in the tables in 40 CFR 158.2120(c) and 40 CFR

158.2171(c). Presently, there is no guideline referenced in the tables for this requirement. Additionally, to clarify this microbial

deposition data requirement, the Agency intends to propose adding a test note to the aforementioned tables, emphasizing the

need for the continuing “maintenance” of a culture deposit to ensure it remains available in case the Agency requests a sample.

Finally, the Agency is proposing to remove incorrect references in 40 CFR 158.2120 and 158.2171 to a paragraph (e) that does

not exist.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158.2100(c)(1) and (c)(2); 40 CFR 158.2120(c) table note. (To search for a specific CFR, visit the

Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a et seq,

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0670

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/

Sectors Affected: 32532; 32519

Agency Contact: Rose Kyprianou Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-5354 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: Kyprianou.Rose@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Cameo Smoot Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-5454 

E-Mail: Smoot.Cameo@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

270
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ81

 View Related Documents

Title: Short-Chained Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs); Significant New Use Rule (SNUR)

Abstract: EPA intends to designate any new manufacture or import of Short-chained Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs) as a

"significant new use" under section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Before the chemical can be manufactured or

imported for the significant new use, the company would be required to provide advance notification to EPA. This approach

gives EPA the opportunity to evaluate any concerns, and if necessary, regulate future manufacture, import, or uses associated

with this chemical. EPA believes that this action is necessary because these chemical substances may be hazardous to human

health and the environment. The required notice will provide EPA the opportunity to evaluate intended significant new uses and

associated activities before they occur and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit those uses or activities.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/00/2011 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Tom Simons Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0517 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: simons.tom@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Priscilla Flattery Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7401M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-2718 

FAX: 202 564-0575

E-Mail: flattery.priscilla@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AA58

 View Related Documents

Title: Follow-Up Rules on Existing Chemicals

Abstract: EPA monitors the commercial development of existing chemicals of concern and/or gathers information to support

planned or ongoing risk assessments on such chemicals. As these chemicals are identified, EPA will initiate rulemakings under

the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) sections 5 and/or 8 to require reporting of appropriate needed information by the

manufacturers, importers and/or processors of these chemicals. Individual proposed or final rules will be published as chemicals

are identified.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704; 40 CFR 707; 40 CFR 710; 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

271
Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 TSCA 5; 15 USC 2607 TSCA 8

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM: 2,4-Pentanedione 09/27/1989 54 FR 39548 

NPRM SNUR: Heavy Metals 01/15/2002 67 FR 1937 

Final SNUR: Heavy Metals 06/00/2011 

Final: 2,4–Pentanedione 12/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM SNUR: Heavy Metals - http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgibin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2002_register&docid=02-963-filed.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental

Jurisdictions Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Agency Contact: Diane Sheridan Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8176 

FAX: 202 564-4775

E-Mail: Sheridan.Diane@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Amy Breedlove Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-9823 

E-Mail: Breedlove.Amy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AA59

 View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rules (SNURs); Follow-Up Rules on Non-5(e) New Chemical Substances

Abstract: Section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) authorizes EPA to determine that a use of a chemical

substance is a "significant new use." After considering all relevant factors, including those listed in TSCA section 5(a)(2), EPA

makes this determination by promulgating Significant New Use Rules (SNURs). These regulations require persons who intend

to manufacture, import, or process a chemical substance contained in a SNUR for an activity that is designated as a significant

new use to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. The required notification will provide EPA with the

opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs. For chemicals which

were the subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs), EPA may promulgate "non-5(e) SNURs" when the Agency did not find that

the chemical’s manufacture, processing, distribution, use or disposal, as described in the PMN, triggered the determinations set

forth under TSCA section 5(e), but did find that certain changes in the chemical’s manufacture, processing, distribution, use or

disposal could result in increased exposures to or releases of the substance. Under the Expedited Follow-up Rule (EFUR), 40

CFR part 721, subpart D, EPA routinely issues batch direct final section 5(e) and non-5(e) SNURs. This Regulatory Agenda

action addresses those chemicals that were subject to a proposed SNUR prior to the effective date of the EFUR or which do not

qualify under the EFUR.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

272
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM: P-84-1056 06/11/1986 51 FR 21199 

NPRM: P-86-566 12/08/1987 52 FR 46496 

NPRM: Aluminum Cross-linked Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose 06/11/1993 58 FR 32628 

Final: Aluminum Cross-linked Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose 04/00/2011 

Final: P-86-566 04/00/2011 

Final: P-84-1056 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 1976

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems/pubs/cnosnurs.htm

Sectors Affected: 325; 324

Agency Contact: Karen Chu Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8773 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: chu.karen@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Greg Schweer Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8469 

FAX: 202 564-9094

E-Mail: Schweer.Greg@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AB27

 View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Chemical-Specific SNURs To Extend Provisions of Section 5(e) Orders

Abstract: Section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) authorizes EPA to determine that a use of a chemical

substance is a "significant new use." After considering all relevant factors, including those listed in TSCA section 5(a)(2), EPA

makes this determination by promulgating Significant New Use Rules (SNURs). These regulations require persons who intend

to manufacture, import, or process a chemical substance contained in a SNUR for an activity that is designated as a significant

new use to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. The required notification will provide EPA with the

opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs. For chemicals which

were the subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs) and for which EPA made a determination that the manufacture, processing,

distribution, use or disposal may present an unreasonable risk, the Agency may issue a section 5(e) consent order to limit these

activities. The Agency generally issues “5(e)” SNURs to extend the controls prescribed in these consent orders to other

manufacturers and processors by designating the manufacture, processing, distribution, use or disposal of the substances

without the specified controls as significant new uses. For chemicals which were the subject of PMNs, EPA may also

promulgate "non-5(e) SNURs" when the Agency did not find that the chemical’s manufacture, processing, distribution, use or

disposal, as described in the PMN, triggered the determinations set forth under TSCA section 5(e) but did find that certain

changes in the chemical’s manufacture, processing, distribution, use or disposal could result in increased exposures to or

releases of the substance. Under the Expedited Follow-up Rule (EFUR), 40 CFR part 721, Subpart D, EPA routinely issues

batch direct final section 5(e) and non-5(e) SNURs.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

273
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM: Aromatic Amino Ether (P90-1840) 06/06/1994 59 FR 29255 

NPRM: Alkenyl Ether of Alkanetriol Polymer (93-458) 12/19/1994 59 FR 65289 

NPRM: Certain Chemical Substances (91-1299/95-1667 91-1298 91-

1297) 06/26/1997 62 FR 34421 

NPRM; Certain Chemical Substances -- (P01-759, P05-555, P07-283) 06/09/2008 73 FR 32508 

Direct Final Action: Certain Chemical Substances, Batch FY08-1 11/05/2008 73 FR 65743 

Direct Final Action, Certain Chemical Substances, Batch FY09-1 06/24/2009 74 FR 29982 

Final; Certain Chemical Substances -- (P01-759, P05-555, P07-283) 07/08/2009 74 FR 32460 

Direct Final Action: Certain Chemical Substances, Batch FY09-2 09/18/2009 74 FR 47877 

NPRM Reproposal for 2 Carbon Nanotubes 11/06/2009 74 FR 57430 

NPRM Revocation Batch FY10-01 12/31/2009 74 FR 69320 

NPRM for 1 Carbon Nanotube 02/03/2010 75 FR 5546 

Direct Final Action Batch 10-01 02/01/2010 75 FR 4983 

Direct Final Rule; Batch FY10-02 06/24/2010 75 FR 35977 

NPRM; Carbon Nanotubes; Reopening Comment Period 07/28/2010 75 FR 44198 

Final Action; 2 Carbon Nanotubes 12/00/2010 

NPRM Batch 10-1 12/00/2010 

Direct Final Action Batch FY10-04 12/00/2010 

Direct Final Action Batch FY10-03 12/00/2010 

Final Action; 1 Carbon Nanotube 12/00/2010 

NPRM Modifications Batch 10-01 12/00/2010 

Final: Certain Chemical Substances (91-1299/95-1667 91-1298 91-

1297) 12/00/2010 

Final: Alkenyl Ether of Alkanetriol Polymer (93-458) 12/00/2010 

Final: Aromatic Amino Ether (P90-1840) 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM; Certain Chemical Substances -- (P01-759, P05-555, P07-

283) - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/2008/June/Day-09/t12862.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems/pubs/cnosnurs.htm

Sectors Affected: 325; 324

Agency Contact: Kenneth Moss Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-9232 

FAX: 202 564-4745

E-Mail: moss.kenneth@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Tracey Klosterman Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-2209 

FAX: 202 564-9490

E-Mail: klosterman.tracey@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AC46

 View Related Documents

Title: Groundwater and Pesticide Management Plan Rule

Abstract: As proposed, this regulation would have established Pesticide Management Plans (PMPs) as a new regulatory

requirement for certain pesticides. Unless a State or tribal authority had an EPA-approved Plan specifying risk-reduction

measures, use of the chemical would be prohibited. The rule would also specify procedures and deadlines for development,

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

274
approval and modification of plans by States and tribal authorities. Several parameters of the program described in the proposed

rule were reconsidered to determine whether the program could address water quality issues rather than ground-water only, and

to determine the best partnership approach to implementation. During this period, the risk level associated with the named

pesticides was reexamined and reduced. Moreover, since the proposal in 1996, many States have adopted the original concept

and framework of Pesticide Management Plans and these programs are operational today. This experience and growth in

knowledge has exceeded the requirements and specifications of the original proposal. Accordingly, EPA intends to withdraw the

proposed rule in the near future.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.170 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a) "FIFRA sec 3"; 7 USC 136(w)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/26/1996 61 FR 33259 

NPRM Comment Period End 10/24/1996 

Notice; Metolachlor 02/23/2000 65 FR 8925 

Supplemental Notice & Extension of Comment Period 03/24/2000 65 FR 15885 

Notice: Withdrawal of NPRM 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1996/June/Day-26/pr768.html

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/

Sectors Affected: 9241

Agency Contact: Charles Evans Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-7199 

E-Mail: Evans.Charles@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Rose Kyprianou Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-5354 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: Kyprianou.Rose@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD16

 View Related Documents

Title: High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals; Testing of Certain Chemicals

Abstract: EPA has or is developing several test rules under section 4(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to

require testing and recordkeeping requirements for certain high production volume (HPV) chemicals (i.e., chemicals which are

manufactured (including imported) in the aggregate at more than 1 million pounds on an annual basis) that have not been

sponsored under the voluntary HPV Challenge Program. Although varied based on specific data needs for the particular

chemical, the data generally collected under these rules may include: acute toxicity, repeat dose toxicity, developmental and

reproductive toxicity, mutagenicity, ecotoxicity, and environmental fate. The first rule proposed testing for 37 HPV chemicals with

substantial worker exposure. When finalized in 2006, the number of chemicals included in the first final rule was reduced to 17

based on new information on annual production volumes, worker exposure, and commitments to the voluntary HPV Challenge

Program. A second proposed test rule that published in 2008 for 19 chemicals is expected to be finalized in 2010. A third

proposed test rule that published in early 2010 for 29 chemicals is expected to be finalized in 2011.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

275
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/26/2000 65 FR 81658 

Final Action 03/16/2006 71 FR 13709 

Direct Final Action1; Revocation; Coke-Oven Light Oil (Coal) 12/08/2006 71 FR 71058 

NPRM2 07/24/2008 73 FR 43314 

NPRM3 02/25/2010 75 FR 8575 

Final Action2 12/00/2010 

Direct Final Action1-2; Revocation 12/00/2010 

NPRM4 04/00/2011 

Final Action3 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0033; EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531; EPA-HQOPPT-2009-0112

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Agency Contact: Paul Campanella Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8091 

E-Mail: Campanella.Paul@epa.gov

Agency Contact: John Schaeffer Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8173 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: Schaeffer.John@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD30

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Data Requirements for Antimicrobials

Abstract: EPA is updating and revising its pesticide data requirements for antimicrobial pesticide products. The existing

antimicrobial data requirements are in 40 CFR part 161. This action will revise the existing data requirements to reflect current

regulatory and scientific standards. The data requirements will cover all scientific disciplines for antimicrobial pesticides,

including product chemistry and residue chemistry, toxicology, and environmental fate and effects. In general, pesticide data

requirements are codified in 40 CFR part 158, which describes the minimum data and information EPA typically requires to

support an application for pesticide registration or amendment; support the maintenance of a pesticide registration by means of

the data call-in process, e.g., as used in the registration review program; or establish or maintain a tolerance or exemption from

the requirements of a tolerance for a pesticide chemical residue. This part establishes general policies and procedures

associated with the submission of data in support of a pesticide regulatory action. It does not, however, include study protocols,

methodology, or standards for conducting or reporting test results; nor does this part describe how the Agency uses or evaluates

the data and information in its risk assessment and risk management decisions, or the regulatory determinations that may be

based upon the data. Once this regulatory change takes effect, data requirements for antimicrobial pesticides will be set forth in

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

276
subpart W of 40 CFR part 158, and part 161 will be removed.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158 and 161 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 to 136y

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/08/2008 73 FR 59381 

Final Action 04/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/2008/October/Day08/p23127.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0110

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/

Sectors Affected: 32519; 32551; 32532; 32561

Agency Contact: Kathryn Boyle Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-6304 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: Boyle.Kathryn@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Nader Elkassabany Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8783 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: elkassabany.nader@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD55

 View Related Documents

Title: Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for Those Derived Through Genetic Engineering From Sexually

Compatible Plants

Abstract: EPA has determined that the record for this action, which was originally proposed in 1994, does not address the

scientific information developed since the original proposal. Consequently, the record would not provide adequate, up-to-date

support for the proposed rule. In 1994, EPA believed that the proposed exemption for plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs)

derived through genetic engineering from plants sexually compatible with the recipient plant had the potential to cover a number

of low-risk products. However, experience in the last decade has shown that such PIPs have not been developed in great

numbers. If EPA were to pursue such an exemption in the future, the Agency would issue a new proposed rule. As such, EPA is

considering withdrawing the 1994 proposal. Withdrawing the 1994 proposal does not preclude EPA’s pursuing the same

approach in the future. If withdrawn, the Agency would create a new entry in the Regulatory Agenda once the Agency decided

to pursue such a rulemaking in the future.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq; 21 USC 346a et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

277
Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/23/1994 59 FR 60496 

Supplemental NPRM 1 07/22/1996 61 FR 37891 

Supplemental NPRM 2 05/16/1997 62 FR 27132 

Supplemental NPRM 3 04/23/1999 64 FR 19958 

Supplemental NPRM 4 07/19/2001 66 FR 37855 

Supplemental NPRM 5 08/20/2001 66 FR 43552 

Notice; Withdrawal of NPRMs 02/00/2011 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4611

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 61131; 111; 32532; 54171

Agency Contact: Elizabeth Milewski Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7201M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8480 

FAX: 202 564-8502

E-Mail: Milewski.Elizabeth@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Keith Matthews Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7511P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8712 

FAX: 703 308-7026

E-Mail: Matthews.Keith@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD56

 View Related Documents

Title: Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for PIPs That Act by Primarily Affecting the Plant

Abstract: EPA has determined that the record for this action, which was originally proposed in 1994, does not address the

scientific information developed since the original proposal. Consequently, the record would not provide adequate, up-to-date

support for the proposed rule. In 1994, EPA believed that the proposed exemption for plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs) that

act by primarily affecting the plant had the potential to cover a number of low-risk products. However, experience in the last

decade has shown that such PIPs have not been developed in great numbers. If EPA were to pursue such an exemption in the

future, the Agency would issue a new proposed rule. As such, EPA is considering withdrawing the 1994 proposal. Withdrawing

the 1994 proposal does not preclude EPA’s pursuing the same approach in the future. If withdrawn, the Agency would create a

new entry in the Regulatory Agenda once the Agency decided to pursue such a rulemaking in the future.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq; 21 USC 346a et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM Original 11/23/1994 59 FR 60496 

Supplemental NPRM 07/22/1996 61 FR 37891 

Supplemental NPRM 2 05/16/1997 62 FR 27132 

Supplemental NPRM 3 04/23/1999 64 FR 19958 

Supplemental NPRM 4 07/19/2001 66 FR 37855 

Notice; Withdrawal of NPRMs 12/00/2010 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

278
Additional Information: SAN No. 4612

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 6113; 111; 32532; 54171

Agency Contact: Elizabeth Milewski Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7201M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8480 

FAX: 202 564-8502

E-Mail: Milewski.Elizabeth@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Keith Matthews Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7511P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-8712 

FAX: 703 308-7026

E-Mail: Matthews.Keith@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ28

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Expansion of Crop Grouping Program

Abstract: EPA is revising the pesticide crop grouping regulations to create new crop groupings, add new subgroups, and

expand existing crop groups by adding new commodities. The current crop groupings allow EPA to establish pesticide

tolerances for multiple related crops based upon data for a representative set of crops. EPA expects these revisions to promote

greater use of crop grouping for tolerance-setting purposes and to facilitate the availability of pesticides for minor crop uses. The

first revision in a series of revisions to the crop grouping regulations was finalized in December 2007. In January 2010, EPA

proposed the next revision to the crop grouping regulations, involving a proposal to create a new crop group and amend three

other crop groups.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 180 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 21 USC 346a

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 1 05/23/2007 72 FR 28920 

Final Action 1 12/07/2007 72 FR 69150 

Final Action 1; Technical Amendment 01/02/2008 73 FR 51 

NPRM 2 01/06/2010 75 FR 807 

Final Action 2 01/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM 1 - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/2007/May/Day23/p9595.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0766

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://cfpub1.epa.gov/oppref/food_feed/index.cfm

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

279
Sectors Affected: 32532; 111

Agency Contact: Rame Cromwell Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-9068 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: Cromwell.Rame@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Barbara Madden Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7505P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-6463 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: madden.barbara@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ43

 View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Inventory Update Reporting Modifications

Abstract: The Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule enables EPA to procure basic information on chemicals manufactured

or processed for commercial purposes, resulting in a unique database that includes current production volume, manufacturing

site-related data, and processing and use-related data for larger volume chemicals. This broad-based collection of

manufacturing and use-exposure-related data provides basic information needed for risk prevention and management activities.

The changes in the IUR Modifications rule are designed: (1) to tailor the information collected to more closely match the

Agency’s overall information needs; (2) to obtain new and updated information relating to potential exposures to a subset of

chemical substances listed on the Toxics Substances and Control Act (TSCA) Inventory; and (3) to improve the utility of the

information reported. EPA believes that changing the information collected through the IUR, the method and frequency of

collecting the information, and confidential business information (CBI) requirements will accomplish these goals. The major

changes in the IUR Modifications Rule include: eliminating the upper threshold to collect processing and use data for all

reported chemicals, collecting multi-year production volume information, returning the frequency of reporting to every 4 years

from every 5, triggering reporting based on the annual production volume since the last IUR, and requiring electronic reporting.

Other changes include modifications to specific data elements such as the production volume and types of industrial and

commercial/consumer uses; requiring an indication of consumer or commercial use and, if commercial, the number of workers;

changes to requirements for making CBI claims; migrating the regulatory text from 40 CFR 710 to 711; and eliminating obsolete

regulatory text.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 710 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607 (TSCA section 8)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM Comment Period Extended 08/13/2010 75 FR 49656 

Final Action 07/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b2ff32; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOPPT-2009-0187

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/iur/

Sectors Affected: 324; 325

Agency Contact: Susan Sharkey Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

280
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8789 

FAX: 202 564-4775

E-Mail: Sharkey.Susan@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Chenise Farquharson Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-7768 

FAX: 202 564-4775

E-Mail: farquharson.chenise@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ57

 View Related Documents

Title: Lead; Clearance and Clearance Testing Requirements for the Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program

Abstract: On May 6, 2010, EPA proposed several revisions to the 2008 Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program

(RRP) rule that established accreditation, training, certification, and recordkeeping requirements, as well as work practice

standards for persons performing renovations for compensation in most pre-1978 housing and child-occupied facilities. Current

requirements include training renovators, other renovation workers, and dust sampling technicians; for certifying renovators,

dust sampling technicians, and renovation firms; for accrediting providers of renovation and dust sampling technician training;

for renovation work practices; and for recordkeeping. EPA is particularly concerned about dust lead hazards generated by

renovations because of the well documented toxicity of lead, especially to younger children. This proposal includes additional

requirements designed to ensure that lead-based paint hazards generated by renovation work are adequately cleaned after

renovation work is finished and before the work areas are re-occupied. Specifically, EPA proposed to require dust wipe testing

after many renovations covered by the RRP rule. For a subset of jobs involving demolition or removal of plaster through

destructive means or the disturbance of paint using machines designed to remove paint through high-speed operation, such as

power sanders or abrasive blasters, this proposal would also require the renovation firm to demonstrate, through dust wipe

testing, that dust-lead levels remaining in the work area are below regulatory levels.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601(c); 15 USC 2682(c)(3); 15 USC 2684; 15 USC 2686; 15 USC 2687

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Signature 04/22/2010 

Other Judicial Signature 07/15/2011 

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: EPA is particularly concerned about dust lead hazards generated by renovations because children,

especially younger children, are at risk for high exposures of lead-based paint dust via hand-to-mouth exposure. This

rulemaking revision is being considered in response to a settlement agreement.

Legal Basis: Section 402(c)(3) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires EPA to regulate renovation or

remodeling activities that create lead-based paint hazards in target housing, which is defined by statute to cover most pre-1978

housing, public buildings built before 1978, and commercial buildings. The work practice requirements for dust wipe testing and

clearance, training, certification and accreditation requirements, and State, territorial, and tribal authorization provisions are

being promulgated under the authority of TSCA sections 402(c)(3), 404, and 407 (15 U.S.C. 2682(c)(3), 2684, and 2687).

Alternatives: In addition to the proposed rule option, the Economic Analysis for the proposed rule analyzes several

alternative options, including options with lower and higher thresholds (in terms of the amount of lead-based paint disturbed) for

renovations that require dust wipe testing or clearance. See also the discussion in the preamble to the proposed rule at page

25058 et seq.

Costs and Benefits: Benefits. The proposed rule is estimated to generate benefits by providing greater assurance that

dust-lead hazards created by renovations are adequately cleaned up, primarily by requiring renovation firms to provide building

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

281
owners and occupants with information on dust lead levels remaining in the work area after many renovation projects, but also

by requiring renovation firms to demonstrate that they have achieved regulatory clearance levels after some of the dustiest

renovations. These changes will protect individuals residing in target housing or attending a child-occupied facility where these

renovation events are performed. It will also protect individuals who move into target housing after such a renovation is

performed, or who visit a friend, relative, or caregiver’s house where such a renovation is performed. EPA has estimated the

number of individuals residing in target housing units or attending COFs where renovation events are performed. The proposed

rule will benefit 809,000 children under the age of 6 and 7,547,000 individuals age 6 and older (including 96,000 pregnant

women) per year by minimizing their exposure to lead dust generated by renovations. The low threshold option would protect

882,000 children under the age of 6 and 8,193,000 individuals age 6 and older, including 105,000 pregnant women. The high

threshold option protects 706,000 children and 6,590,000 individuals age 6 and older, including 83,000 pregnant women. The

remaining three alternative options (dust wipe testing only, clearance only, and third party dust wipe testing) would affect the

same number of individuals as the proposed rule, although the amount of protection provided to some of those individuals may

differ from the proposed rule. Costs. Total annualized costs for the proposed rule are $272 million per year using a 3 percent

discount rate and $293 million per year using a 7 percent discount rate. Under the low threshold option, costs are $312 million

per year with a 3 percent discount rate and $336 million per year with a 7 percent rate. Under the high threshold option, costs

are $224 million per year with a 3 percent discount rate and $242 million per year with a 7 percent discount rate. The option that

only requires dust wipe testing costs $268 million per year with a 3 percent discount rate and $288 million per year with a 7

percent discount rate. The option requiring clearance for all renovations covered by the proposed rule costs $367 million with a

3 percent discount rate and $394 million with a 7 percent discount rate. The option requiring the use of a third-party for dust

wipe sampling costs $431 million per year with a 3 percent discount rate and $459 million per year with a 7 percent discount

rate. These cost estimates are based on the assumption that improved lead test kits would be available.

Risks: Lead is known for its "broad array of deleterious effects on multiple organ systems via widely diverse mechanisms of

action." (EPA Air Quality Criteria for Lead, October 2006). This array of health effects includes heme biosynthesis and related

functions; neurological development and function; reproduction and physical development; kidney function; cardiovascular

function; and immune function. There is also some evidence of lead carcinogenicity, primarily from animal studies, together with

limited human evidence of suggestive associations. Of particular interest to EPA during the RRP rulemaking was the

delineation of lowest observed effect levels for those lead-induced effects that are most clearly associated with blood lead levels

of less than 10 micrograms per deciliter in children and adults. See also the discussion in the preamble to the proposed rule at

page 25039 et seq.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/06/2010 75 FR 25038 

NPRM Comment Period End 07/06/2010 

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 07/07/2010 75 FR 38959 

NPRM Comment Period Extended To 08/06/2010 

Final Action 07/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ae7efa; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOPPT-2005-0049

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/renovation.htm

Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0484 

E-Mail: Wheeler.Cindy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Michelle Price Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0744 

E-Mail: Price.Michelle@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

282
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ60

 View Related Documents

Title: Mercury Export Ban Act (MEBA); Essential Use Exemption Instructions

Abstract: The Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 amended section 12 of the Toxics Substances and Control Act (TSCA) to

prohibit the export of elemental mercury from the United States effective January 1, 2013. The new provision in TSCA allows

any person residing in the U.S. to petition the Administrator for an exemption to the export ban. If the Administrator makes

certain findings listed in the Act, the Administrator may grant exemptions to the ban through notice and comment rulemaking.

Through a posting on the Web site, EPA will provide the basic instructions and information related to these exemptions.

Exemption requests themselves will be acted on through separate rulemakings that will be covered by a separate entry in the

Regulatory Agenda, as appropriate.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: PL 110-414

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory The mercury export ban goes into effect January 1, 2013. 01/01/2013 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Website Posting 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5387.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/mercury/

Agency Contact: Julie Simpson Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1980 

E-Mail: Simpson.Julie@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Sue Slotnick Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1973 

E-Mail: slotnick.sue@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ74

 View Related Documents

Title: Revision to Compliance Date for Pesticide Container/Containment Rule

Abstract: On June 15, 2010, EPA granted a 4-month extension of the compliance date in 40 CFR 156.159 by which the

pesticide labels must be updated with the container management statements required by the pesticide container and

containment regulations originally published in 2006 and amended in 2008. At the same time, EPA proposed and sought public

comment on a 1-year extension. The Agency believes that an extension of the compliance date is necessary and appropriate.

While there has been significant progress in the number of pesticide labels that have been updated with the container

management statements required by the container-containment regulations, EPA has recently become aware that there are still

a substantial number of products whose labels must be submitted to EPA, reviewed and approved by EPA, and reviewed and

approved by the States. This amendment does not otherwise involve any other changes to the regulations.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

283
Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 156 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 to 136y

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory FIFRA section 25(a)(4) requires EPA to promulgate the rule and submit

it to Congress at least 60 days before it can be effective. 10/15/2010 

Other Statutory The compliance date in 40 CFR 156.159. 12/16/2010 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/15/2010 75 FR 33744 

Final Action 12/00/2010 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b01c48; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–

OPP–2005–0327

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/regulating/storage.htm

Sectors Affected: 32532

Agency Contact: Nancy Fitz Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-7385 

FAX: 703 308-3259

E-Mail: fitz.nancy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Jeanne Kasai Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-3240 

FAX: 703 308-3259

E-Mail: kasai.jeanne@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AB08

 View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rules

Abstract: These rules add chemicals to the list of chemicals and designated mixtures subject to the requirements of the

Toxic Substances Control Act section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rule (40 CFR part 712). These chemicals have

been identified by the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, other EPA offices, and other Federal agencies, as well as

recommended for testing consideration by the Interagency Testing Committee. Manufacturers and importers are required to

submit exposure-related data (EPA Form No. 7710-35) on the chemicals. The data will be used to monitor the levels of

production, import and/or processing of the identified substances and the avenues of human and environmental exposure to

these substances. This Regulatory Agenda entry identifies the most recent rules and any anticipated rules.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 712 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(a) TSCA 8(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

284
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action - Next ITC List 00/00/0000 

Final Rule for 55th, 56th and 58th ITC Lists 08/16/2006 71 FR 47122 

Additional Information: SAN No. 2178; EPA publication information: Final Rule for 55th, 56th and 58th ITC Lists -

http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/2006/August/Day-16/t13489.htm.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Agency Contact: Karen Chu Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8773 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: chu.karen@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Mike Mattheisen Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3077 

E-Mail: mattheisen.mike@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AB11

 View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting Rules

Abstract: These rules require chemical manufacturers, importers, and processors to submit unpublished health and safety

data on chemicals added to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting Rule (40

CFR part 716). These chemicals have been identified by the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), other EPA

offices, and other Federal agencies, as well as recommended for testing consideration by the Interagency Testing Committee

(ITC). This Regulatory Agenda entry serves as a placeholder for future rules, and, when applicable, identifies the most recent

rules and any anticipated rules.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 716 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(d) TSCA 8(d)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action - Next ITC List 00/00/0000 

Final Rule for 60th ITC List 01/29/2008 73 FR 5109 

Additional Information: SAN No. 1139; EPA publication information: Final Rule for 60th ITC List -

http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/2008/January/Day-29/t1546.pdf.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

285
Agency Contact: Karen Chu Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8773 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: chu.karen@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Mike Mattheisen Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3077 

E-Mail: mattheisen.mike@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AB94

 View Related Documents

Title: Testing of Existing Chemicals (Overview Entry for Future Needs)

Abstract: Section 4 of Toxics Substances and Control Act (TSCA) gives EPA the authority to require chemical manufacturers

and processors to test existing chemicals. Under section 4, EPA can by rule require testing after finding that (1) a chemical may

present an unreasonable risk of injury to human health or the environment, and/or the chemical is produced and enters the

environment in substantial quantities or there is or may be significant or substantial human exposure to the chemical, (2) the

available data to evaluate the chemical are inadequate, and (3) testing is needed to develop the needed data. The Chemical

Testing Program in EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) also works with members of the U.S. chemical

industry to develop data via TSCA section 4 Enforceable Consent Agreements (ECAs). ECAs are usually less resource

intensive than formal TSCA rule-making. In developing ECAs, EPA may consider agreed-upon pollution prevention and other

types of product stewardship initiatives by the chemical industry as a possible substitute for or adjunct to certain types of

testing. The Agency may also consider test rules or ECAs for chemicals or categories of chemicals which have been identified

for testing consideration by other Federal or other EPA offices through EPA review processes. This regulatory agenda entry is

considered a "generic entry" because it is only intended to alert the public that within the next 6 months the Agency may

consider other chemicals for test rules, or ECAs that have not yet been identified. A separate activity specific entry will be

included in the regulatory agenda once the Agency decides to develop a test rule or ECA.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4; 15 USC 2611 TSCA 12

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 3493

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Agency Contact: Karen Chu Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8773 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: chu.karen@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Mike Mattheisen Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

286
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3077 

E-Mail: mattheisen.mike@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AC21

 View Related Documents

Title: Lead Fishing Sinkers; Manufacturing, Processing, and Distribution in Commerce

Abstract: In 1991, EPA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking in response to a citizen's petition filed by the

Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), Federation of Fly Fishers, Trumpeter Swan Society, and North American Loon Fund under

section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The petition asked EPA to

initiate rulemaking proceedings under section 6 of TSCA to require that the sale of lead fishing sinkers be accompanied by an

appropriate label or notice warning that such products are toxic to wildlife. In 1994, EPA proposed a rule under section 6(a) of

TSCA to prohibit the manufacturing, processing, and distribution in commerce in the United States, of certain smaller size

fishing sinkers containing lead and zinc, and mixed with other substances, including those made of brass. EPA intends to reevaluate the 1994 proposal.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 TSCA 6

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Supplemental NPRM 00/00/0000 

ANPRM 05/13/1991 56 FR 22096 

NPRM 03/09/1994 59 FR 11122 

Additional Information: SAN No. 3252

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/lead/

Agency Contact: Christina Wadlington Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1859 

FAX: 202 566-0471

E-Mail: Wadlington.Christina@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Tom Simons Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0517 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: simons.tom@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AC37

 View Related Documents

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

287
Title: Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Refractory Ceramic Fibers (RCFs)

Abstract: EPA has instituted a program to monitor the commercial development of existing chemicals of concern and/or to

gather information to support risk assessments on such chemicals including Refractory Ceramic Fibers (RCFs). RCFs are

amorphous synthetic fibers that part of larger group called synthetic vitreous fibers (SVFs). RCFs are made by either "spinning"

or "blowing" and are used primarily for high temperature industrial insulation purposes (e.g., furnaces, heaters, kilns) in addition

to automotive applications, aerospace uses, and in certain other industrial applications. As chemicals of potential concern are

identified, EPA will initiate rulemakings under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) when appropriate, to require reporting

by the manufacturers, importers and/or processors of these chemicals.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704; 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 TSCA 5; 15 USC 2605 TSCA 6

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM Original 03/21/1994 59 FR 13294 

Additional Information: SAN No. 3528

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/

Sectors Affected: 327999

Agency Contact: Robert Courtnage Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1081 

E-Mail: courtnage.robert@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Peter Gimlin Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0515 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: gimlin.peter@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AC51

 View Related Documents

Title: Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan Revisions

Abstract: The Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA) amended TSCA to require that EPA

revise its asbestos model accreditation plan (MAP) to extend training and accreditation requirements to include persons

performing certain asbestos-related work in public or commercial buildings, to increase the minimum number of training hours

required for accreditation purposes and to effect other changes necessary to implement the amendments. On February 3, 1994,

EPA issued an interim final rule to revise the asbestos MAP to clarify the types of persons who must be accredited to work with

asbestos in schools and public or commercial buildings; to increase the minimum number of hours of training for asbestos

abatement workers and contractor/supervisors, including additional hours of hands-on health and safety training; and to effect a

variety of other necessary changes as mandated by section 15(a)(3) of the ASHARA. This interim final rule satisfied the

statutory deadline. EPA will continue to consider finalizing the MAP rule and/ or promulgating regulatory revisions to sunset

current EPA MAP accreditations granted to training providers.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

288
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 763 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2646 TSCA 206

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

Model Plan 05/13/1992 57 FR 20438 

Interim Final Action 02/03/1994 59 FR 5236 

Additional Information: SAN No. 3148

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental

Jurisdictions Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/asbestos/

Sectors Affected: 92312; 611519

Agency Contact: Robert Courtnage Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1081 

E-Mail: courtnage.robert@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Shiela Canavan Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1980 

E-Mail: canavan.shiela@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AC64

 View Related Documents

Title: Lead-Based Paint Activities; Bridges and Structures; Training, Accreditation, and Certification Rule and Model State

Plan Rule

Abstract: The Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 amended the Toxic Substances Control Act

(TSCA) to require EPA to promulgate regulations governing lead-based paint (LBP) activities to ensure that individuals engaged

in such activities are properly trained, that LBP training programs are accredited, and that contractors engaged in such activities

are certified. In addition, EPA must promulgate a Model State program which may be adopted by any State which seeks to

administer and enforce a State Program. EPA promulgated regulations for LBP activities in target housing and child occupied

facilities as well as training and certification of training programs for LBP activities in 1996 (see 40 CFR 745). Regulations for

LBP activities in public and commercial buildings and bridges and other structures are still under development.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2682; 15 USC 2684; 15 USC 2687; PL 102-550 sec 402; PL 102-550 sec 404

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4376

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

289
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental

Jurisdictions; Organizations Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/lead/

Sectors Affected: 23411; 611519

Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0484 

E-Mail: Wheeler.Cindy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Michelle Price Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0744 

E-Mail: Price.Michelle@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD14

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Registration Requirements for Antimicrobial Pesticide Products

Abstract: In 2001, EPA finalized certain labeling regulations for pesticide products, clarifications regarding the application of

Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to nitrogen stabilizers, and regulations that contain statutory

provisions excluding certain types of products from regulation of pesticides. These topics were part of the 1999 proposal

concerning antimicrobial products, and are being promulgated separately for convenience. In September 1999, EPA proposed

procedures for the registration of antimicrobial products, including labeling standards for antimicrobial public health products to

ensure that these products are appropriately labeled for the level of antimicrobial activity they demonstrate. EPA also proposed

to modify its notification process for antimicrobial products to conform to the statutorily prescribed process; and to exempt

certain antimicrobial products from FIFRA regulation. In November 1999, EPA proposed procedures for the registration of

antimicrobial pesticides and performance standards for public health antimicrobial pesticides, as well as other changes affecting

all pesticide products, including interpretation of new provisions relating to nitrogen stabilizers, and updating and reorganization

of human hazard labeling requirements. After considering public comments and an extensive stakeholder dialogue, EPA will

determine next steps for this action.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a(h); 7 USC 136(w)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 2 00/00/0000 

NPRM 09/17/1999 64 FR 50671 

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 11/16/1999 64 FR 62145 

Final Action 1 12/14/2001 66 FR 64759 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: OPP-300890

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/regpolicy.htm

Sectors Affected: 32519; 32532; 32551; 32561

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

290
Agency Contact: Jennifer McLain Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-0293 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: mclain.jennifer@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Kathryn Boyle Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-6304 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: Boyle.Kathryn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD44

 View Related Documents

Title: Test Rule; Multiple Substance Rule for the Testing of Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity

Abstract: On March 4, 1991, EPA issued a proposed Toxics Substances and Control Act (TSCA) section 4 Test Rule to

require testing of 12 chemicals for developmental and/or reproductive effects. Since issuing that proposed rule, 11 of the subject

chemical substances have been sponsored under the International Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

(OECD) HPV Screening Information Data Set (SIDS) Program, EPA's voluntary HPV Chemical Challenge Program, and/or the

International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA). Information obtained under these various data collection/development

programs will be used to inform EPA's decision regarding the need to re-propose and ultimately finalize this Test Rule for some

or all of the subject chemicals and for which endpoints they should be tested.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790-799; 40 CFR 704 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4; 15 USC 2625 TSCA 26

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM - Reproposal 00/00/0000 

NPRM Original 03/04/1991 56 FR 9092 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4395

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Agency Contact: Catherine Roman Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8172 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: Roman.Catherine@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Karen Chu Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8773 

FAX: 202 564-4765

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

291
E-Mail: chu.karen@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD49

 View Related Documents

Title: Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for those Based on Viral Coat Protein Genes

Abstract: EPA is considering the addition of plant-incorporated protectants based on viral coat protein genes to its plantincorporated protectants exemptions at 40 CFR 174. Substances which plants produce for protection against pests, and the

genetic material necessary to produce them, are pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act

(FIFRA), if humans intend these substances to "prevent, repel or mitigate any pest." These substances are also "pesticide

chemical residues" under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). The proposed criteria were intended to clearly

identify and exempt only those residues for which a long history of safe exposure and consumption can support exemption. EPA

believes there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to such residues, including all

anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information. Therefore, EPA is concurrently

considering the exemption of plant-incorporated protectants based on viral coat protein genes from the requirement of a

tolerance under section 408 of the FFDCA. Due to public interest and new scientific information, additional public comment on

this proposal (originally published in 1994) was requested in 2001. After considering public comment and additional review by

the Science Advisory Panel, EPA issued a reproposal in 2007.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a) et seq; 7 USC 136 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM Original 11/23/1994 59 FR 60496 

Supplemental NPRM 1 07/22/1996 61 FR 37891 

Supplemental NPRM 2 05/16/1997 62 FR 27132 

Supplemental NPRM 3 04/23/1999 64 FR 19958 

Supplemental NPRM 4 07/19/2001 66 FR 37855 

Reproposal 04/18/2007 72 FR 19589 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Reproposal - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/2007/April/Day18/p7297.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0642

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 111; 32532; 54171

Agency Contact: Kenneth Haymes Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7202M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-0306 

FAX: 202 564-8502

E-Mail: Haymes.Kenneth@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Tom McClintock Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7202M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8488 

E-Mail: mcclintock.tom@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

292
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD64

 View Related Documents

Title: Lead-Based Paint; Amendments to the Requirements for Disclosure of Known Lead-Based Paint or Lead-Based Paint

Hazards in Target Housing

Abstract: EPA intends to amend existing requirements to clarify to which target housing transactions the rule applies; add or

clarify definitions of important terms; clarify the disclosure responsibilities of agents; clarify what information must be disclosed;

clarify recordkeeping requirements to support enforcement; and amend existing regulatory text to resolve some inconsistent

interpretations and to incorporate interpretations that have been issued through guidance. Small businesses and

State/local/Tribal governments that sell or lease target housing will be affected in that they will need to become familiar with

new/revised requirements that apply to these transactions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745.100 to 119 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 4852d

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2012 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4777

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Organizations Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/lead/

Sectors Affected: 92511; 53111; 53121; 522292; 531311

Agency Contact: John Wilkins Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0477 

FAX: 202 566-0471

E-Mail: wilkins.john@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0484 

E-Mail: Wheeler.Cindy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ07

 View Related Documents

Title: Testing Agreement for Aryl Phosphates (ITC List 2)

Abstract: EPA published a proposed test rule under section 4 of the Toxics Substances and Control Act (TSCA) in 1992

covering a number of aryl phosphate base stocks. On March 30, 1993, EPA announced initiation of negotiations with the Aryl

Phosphates Panel of the Chemical Manufacturers Association (now the American Chemistry Council or ACC) to develop a

TSCA Section 4 Enforceable Consent Agreement (ECA) for aryl phosphate base stocks as an alternative approach to testing

under the proposed rule (58 FR 16669). On October 9, 1998, EPA sent letters to the Chief Executive Officers of companies,

including those who were participating in the development of this ECA, to announce EPA's High Production Volume (HPV)

Challenge Program. Consistent with the International Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD)

Screening Information Data Set (SIDS) Program, EPA's HPV Challenge Program encourages US chemical producers and

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

293
importers to voluntarily provide existing screening level data, or, if none exist, to develop such data on US HPV chemicals.

Because some overlap of testing in the HPV Challenge and this ECA initiative were identified, the industry committed to develop

the screening level data for the HPV Challenge Program before continuing with further development of the ECA. In this way,

results from the HPV Challenge program would feed back into consideration of needs for the ECA testing and, where possible,

could avert some or all of the potential overlap testing. EPA is evaluating the need for any additional testing of the subject aryl

phosphate base stocks under an ECA or rulemaking.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice: Enforcable Consent Agreement 00/00/0000 

ANPRM 12/29/1983 48 FR 57452 

NPRM 01/17/1992 57 FR 2138 

Additional Information: SAN No. 3493.2.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Agency Contact: Karen Chu Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8773 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: chu.karen@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Mike Mattheisen Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3077 

E-Mail: mattheisen.mike@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ20

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Applicators

Abstract: EPA is proposing change the federal regulations under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act

(FIFRA) that guide the certified pesticide applicator program (40 CFR 171). Change is sought to strengthen the regulations to

better protect pesticide applicators and the public and the environment from harm due to pesticide exposure. The possible need

for change arose from EPA discussions with key stakeholders. EPA has been in extensive discussions with stakeholders since

1997 when the Certification and Training Assessment Group (CTAG) was established. CTAG is a forum used by regulatory and

academic stakeholders to discuss the current state of, and the need for improvements in, the national certified pesticide

applicator program. Throughout these extensive interactions with stakeholders, EPA has learned of the potential need for

changes to the regulation.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 171; 40 CFR 156 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136; 7 USC 136i; 7 USC 136w

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

294
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0561

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/worker.htm

Sectors Affected: 111; 1132; 115; 112; 5617; 32532; 9241

Agency Contact: Kathy Davis Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-7002 

FAX: 703 308-2962

E-Mail: davis.kathy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Richard Pont Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-6448 

FAX: 703 308-2962

E-Mail: pont.richard@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ22

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Agricultural Worker Protection Standard Revisions

Abstract: EPA is developing a proposal under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to revise the

federal regulations guiding agricultural worker protection (40 CFR 170). The changes under consideration are intended to

improve agricultural workers' ability to protect themselves from potential exposure to pesticides and pesticide residues. In

addition, EPA is proposing to make adjustments to improve and clarify current requirements and facilitate enforcement. Other

changes sought are to establish a right-to-know Hazard Communication program and make improvements to pesticide safety

training, with improved worker safety the intended outcome. The potential need for change arose from EPA discussions with key

stakeholders beginning in 1996 and continuing through 2004. EPA held nine public meetings throughout the country during

which the public submitted written and verbal comments on issues of their concern. In 2000 through 2004, EPA held meetings

where invited stakeholders identified their issues and concerns with the regulations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 170 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136; 7 USC 136w

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0561

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

295
RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/worker.htm

Sectors Affected: 111; 115; 32532

Agency Contact: Kathy Davis Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-7002 

FAX: 703 308-2962

E-Mail: davis.kathy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Richard Pont Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-6448 

FAX: 703 308-2962

E-Mail: pont.richard@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ23

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Tolerance Processing Fees

Abstract: Section 408(m) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) was amended to require EPA to charge

tolerance fees that, in the aggregate, will cover all costs associated with processing tolerance actions, including filing a tolerance

petition, and establishing, modifying, leaving in effect, or revoking a tolerance or tolerance exemption. EPA developed a final

rule that would have adjusted the fee structure and fee amounts for tolerance actions. A final rule completed OMB review on

December 31, 2003, but has not been issued because the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2004, signed on January 23,

2004, prohibited EPA from collecting any tolerances fees until September 30, 2008. This prohibition was expanded in 2005 to

include a prohibition on using federal funding to perform any work on a final tolerance fee rulemaking. As such, no rulemaking

activities are currently planned. Most recently, the prohibition was extended yet again in 2007 when Congress adopted the

Pesticide Registration Improvement Renewal Act. In that bill, Congress extended the ban on assessing tolerance fees through

September 30, 2012.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 180; 40 CFR 178 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM 06/09/1999 64 FR 31039 

Supplemental NPRM 07/24/2000 65 FR 45569 

Supplemental NPRM 2 08/31/2000 65 FR 52979 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1999/June/Day09/p14477.htm; http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/fees/; EPA Docket information: Legacy Docket # OPP-30115

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/regulating/fees/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 32532

Agency Contact: Lindsay Moose Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7501P

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

296
Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-7108 

FAX: 703 305-6244

E-Mail: moose.lindsay@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ31

 View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule for Chloranil

Abstract: Chloranil is used as a basic feedstock for certain dyes and pigments and in the production of rubber tires. Chloranil

was one of the chemicals identified for testing in the Dioxin/Furan (D/F) test rule. Early testing results revealed that dioxin levels

in Chloranil could vary by more than two orders of magnitude depending on the chemical manufacturing process involved. It

appeared that the “low dioxin” manufacturing process could produce Chloranil with dioxin contamination levels below 20 ppb

TEQ. Based on this information, EPA entered into a formal agreement with Chloranil importers (there was no domestic

production of “high dioxin” Chloranil) to only import Chloranil made through the “low dioxin” process. As a follow up to this

agreement, a Chloranil Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) was proposed in 1993. Under the provisions of the draft SNUR any

Chloranil imported or domestically produced with dioxin contamination levels greater than 20 ppb TEQ would be considered a

new use and require reporting under section 5(a)(1)(A) of the Toxic Substances Control Act. In the SNUR proposal EPA stated

that it would not promulgate a final rule until it had all of the D/F test rule data. EPA accepted the final test rule data in June of

2001. The test rule requirements continue to apply to any new manufacturer or importer of Chloranil. No new importer or

manufacturer has identified themselves, although EPA has received inquiries from time to time about the applicability of the test

rule to new imports. EPA therefore believes that all importation of Chloranil is still covered under the formal agreements and

that there is no current import or domestic manufacture of high dioxin Chloranil. Because a significant time has passed since

proposal, the Agency reopened the comment period in 2007. EPA is currently formulating the final rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607 TSCA 8

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000 

NPRM Original 05/12/1993 58 FR 27986 

Reopening of Comment Period 01/30/2007 72 FR 4224 

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2070-AA58; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2006–0795

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325; 32513; 32411; 32621

Agency Contact: Brian Symmes Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1983 

FAX: 202 566-0470

E-Mail: symmes.brian@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ34

 View Related Documents

Title: Test Rule; Nonylphenol (NP) and its Ethoxylates (NPE)

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

297
Abstract: This rulemaking proceeding was initiated in response to a citizen's petition filed in June 2007 under section 21 of

the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requesting that EPA require manufacturers and importers of nonylphenol (NP) and

nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEs) to conduct certain health and safety studies under TSCA section 4. Based on its review of the

information submitted in support of the petition, additional information obtained by EPA, and public comments. EPA granted the

request to initiate a proceeding to require chronic aquatic toxicity testing. In order to develop a properly tailored test requirement

that would provide EPA with sufficient data to make a reasoned evaluation of the environmental effects of NPEs, EPA

commenced the proceeding by issuing an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) on June 15, 2009 that solicits

public comment on several testing issues prior to the issuance of any proposed rule. The public comment period for the ANPRM

ended on September 15, 2009 and EPA is now evaluating the need to propose a TSCA section 4 Test Rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 06/17/2009 74 FR 28654 

NPRM 12/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2007–0490

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Agency Contact: John Schaeffer Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8173 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: Schaeffer.John@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Karen Chu Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8773 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: chu.karen@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ38

 View Related Documents

Title: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Reassessment of Use Authorizations

Abstract: EPA's regulations governing the use of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in electrical equipment and other

applications were first issued in the late 1970s and have not been updated since 1998. EPA is initiating rulemaking to reexamine

these ongoing PCB uses with an eye to ending or phasing out uses that can no longer be justified under section 6(e) of the

Toxics Substances and Control Act (TSCA), which requires that EPA determine certain authorized uses will not present an

unreasonable risk of injury to health and the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 TSCA 6(e)

Legal Deadline: None

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

298
Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 04/07/2010 75 FR 17645 

ANPRM Extension of Comment Period End 06/16/2010 75 FR 34076 

NPRM 05/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0757

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/tsd/pcbs/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 22

Agency Contact: John Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0512 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: Smith.JohnH@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Robert Courtnage Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1081 

E-Mail: courtnage.robert@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ39

 View Related Documents

Title: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Placeholder for Petitions Seeking a Manufacturing (Import) Exemption for Use

Abstract: Section 6(e)(3)(B) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) provides that the Administrator may grant, by rule,

exemptions from the prohibitions against manufacturing, processing and distribution in commerce of poly chlorinated biphenyls

(PCBs) upon finding that 1) no unreasonable risk to health or the environment will occur, and 2) good faith efforts have been

made by the petitioner to develop a substitute for PCB which does not pose an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the

environment. This Regulatory Agenda entry is intended to capture petitions that request an exemption to use PCBs. These

petitions are managed by the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Petitions that request an exemption to dispose of PCBs

are managed by the Office of Solid Waste, and are captured by a separate Regulatory Agenda entry. Currently, no petitions are

pending.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 TSCA 6(e)(3)(B)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

Additional Information: SAN No. 2150

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

299
RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/pcb

Sectors Affected: 56292; 5622

Related RINs: Previously Reported as 2070-AB20

Agency Contact: Peter Gimlin Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0515 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: gimlin.peter@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0514 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ44

 View Related Documents

Title: Formaldehyde Emissions From Pressed Wood Products

Abstract: In 2008, EPA initiated a proceeding under Toxics Substance and Control Act (TSCA) to investigate risks posed by

formaldehyde emitted from pressed wood products. An advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) sought to engage

stakeholders to contribute to obtaining a better understanding of the available control technologies and approaches, industry

practices, and the implementation of California's formaldehyde emission limits. Subsequently, EPA developed an industry

survey to obtain more information on these ANPRM topics and continued to assess the hazards of and exposures to

formaldehyde emissions from pressed wood products. On July 7, 2010, the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood

Products Act was enacted. This law amends TSCA to establish specific formaldehyde emission limits for hardwood plywood,

particleboard, and medium-density fiberboard, which limits are identical to the California emission limits for these products. The

law further requires EPA to promulgate implementing regulations by January 1, 2013.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2697; TSCA sec 601

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 01/01/2013 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 12/03/2008 73 FR 73620 

ANPRM: Extension of Comment Period 01/30/2009 74 FR 5632 

ANPRM Comment Period End 02/02/2009 

ANPRM Comment Period Extended To 03/19/2010 

NPRM 12/00/2011 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0627

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise

be of international interest.

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest/formaldehyde/index.html

Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

300
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0484 

E-Mail: Wheeler.Cindy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0514 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ49

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Data Requirements for Product Performance

Abstract: EPA will propose to amend efficacy data requirements that specifically address the registration data needs of

invertebrate pesticide product registrations as mandated by Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). This

rulemaking will provide clarity, consistency, and transparency. This proposal will seek to amend the current efficacy data

requirements codified in 40 CFR part 158, which describes the minimum data and information EPA typically requires to support

an application for pesticide registration or amendment; and the maintenance of a pesticide registration, e.g., as in the

registration review program.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158, 156 and 152 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 to 136y

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2012 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5331

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/pesticides

Sectors Affected: 32532

Agency Contact: Candace Brassard Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-6598 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: brassard.candace@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Amaris Johnson Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-9542 

FAX: 703 308-7070

E-Mail: johnson.amaris@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

301
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ56

 View Related Documents

Title: Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program for Public and Commercial Buildings

Abstract: Section 402(c)(3) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires EPA to regulate renovation or remodeling

activities in target housing (most pre-1978 housing), pre-1978 public buildings, and commercial buildings that create lead-based

paint hazards. On April 22, 2008, EPA issued a final rule to address lead-based paint hazards created by these activities in

target housing and child-occupied facilities built before 1978 (child-occupied facilities are a subset of public and commercial

buildings or facilities where children under age 6 spend a great deal of time). The 2008 rule established requirements for

training renovators, other renovation workers, and dust sampling technicians; for certifying renovators, dust sampling

technicians, and renovation firms; for accrediting providers of renovation and dust sampling technician training; for renovation

work practices; and for recordkeeping. This new rulemaking will address renovation or remodeling activities in the remaining

buildings described in TSCA section 402(c)(3): public buildings built before 1978 and commercial buildings that are not childoccupied facilities. On May 6, 2010, EPA announced the commencement of proceedings to propose lead-safe work practices

and other requirements for renovations on the exteriors of public and commercial buildings and to determine whether leadbased paint hazards are created by interior renovation, repair, and painting projects in public and commercial buildings. For

those renovations in the interiors of public and commercial buildings that create lead-based paint hazards, EPA will propose

regulations to address these hazards.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2682(c)(3)

Legal Deadline: 

 Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial ANPRM Signature. 04/22/2010 

NPRM Judicial Signature 12/15/2011 

Other Judicial Signature 07/15/2013 

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 05/06/2010 75 FR 24848 

NPRM 12/00/2011 

Final Action 07/00/2013 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ae7eb8; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOPPT-2010-0173

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/renovation.htm

Agency Contact: Hans Scheifele Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3122 

E-Mail: Scheifele.Hans@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0484 

E-Mail: Wheeler.Cindy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

302
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ62

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Public Availability of Identities of Inert Ingredients in Pesticides

Abstract: In response to two petitions under the Administrative Procedures Act seeking disclosure of selected inert

ingredients on pesticide labels (based on the hazard of that ingredient), EPA is contemplating rulemaking to increase public

availability of both potentially hazardous inert ingredients and of inert ingredient identities in general. This action would assist

consumers and users of pesticides in making informed decisions and reduce the presence of potentially hazardous ingredients

in pesticides. EPA is considering various approaches, including disclosure based on hazard and broader disclosure of inert

ingredient identities.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000 

ANPRM 12/23/2009 74 FR 68215 

ANPRM Extension of Comment Period 02/22/2010 75 FR 7560 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0635

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/

Agency Contact: Cameo Smoot Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-5454 

FAX: 703 305-5884

E-Mail: smoot.cameo@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Rose Kyprianou Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 305-5354 

E-Mail: Kyprianou.Rose@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ64

 View Related Documents

Title: Lead Wheel Weights; Regulatory Investigation

Abstract: In 2009, EPA initiated a proceeding under the Toxics Substances Control Act (TSCA) to investigate potential lead

hazards associated with the manufacture, processing, and distribution in commerce of lead wheel balancing weights ("wheel

weights"). Lead is highly toxic, especially to young children. According to a U.S. Geological Survey study in 2003, 65,000 tons of

lead wheel weights were in use in the United States and approximately 2,000 tons of these weights were lost from vehicles into

the environment. Voluntary actions on the part of U.S. auto manufactures and an European Union ban on their use has reduced

the number of lead wheel weights, but they continue to be predominant product in the tire replacement market.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

303
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2012 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5398

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/lead/

Agency Contact: Mark Henshall Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0523 

FAX: 202 566-0471

E-Mail: henshall.mark@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Michelle Price Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0744 

E-Mail: Price.Michelle@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ69

 View Related Documents

Title: Short-Chained Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs); Regulation(s) Under TSCA

Abstract: EPA is initiating action under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to ban or restrict the manufacture, import,

processing or distribution in commerce, export, and use of Short Chained Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs). EPA is concerned with

SCCPs because they are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic to aquatic organisms at low concentrations. They can remain in

the environment for a significant amount of time and can bioaccumulate in animal tissues, increasing the probability and duration

of exposure. Even relatively small releases of these chemicals from individual facilities that manufacture import, process or use

these chemicals or releases from waste management facilities have the potential to accumulate over time to higher levels and

cause significant adverse impacts on the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2012 

Additional Information: SAN No. 5429

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppts/

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

304
Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Marc Edmonds Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0758 

E-Mail: Edmonds.Marc@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Michelle Price Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0744 

E-Mail: Price.Michelle@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ72

 View Related Documents

Title: Long-Chain Perfluorinated Chemicals (LCPFCs); Regulation(s) Under TSCA

Abstract: Section 6 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) provides authority for EPA to ban or restrict the manufacture

(including import), processing, and use of these chemicals. EPA is considering initiating TSCA section 6 rulemaking for

managing long-chain perfluorinated chemicals (LCPFCs). LCPFCs includes two sub-categories: perfluoroalkyl sulfonates

(PFAS) and perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFAC). The PFAS sub-category includes perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS),

perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), other higher homologues, and their salts and precursors. The PFAC sub-category

includes perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA, sometimes called C8), other higher homologues, and their salts and precursors. Some

of those potential PFAC precursors include chemicals known commercially as fluorotelomers. PFOA is a synthetic (man-made)

chemical that does not occur naturally in the environment. Companies use PFOA to make fluoropolymers, substances with

special properties that have thousands of important manufacturing and industrial applications. Fluoropolymers impart valuable

properties, including fire resistance and oil, stain, grease, and water repellency. They are used to provide non-stick surfaces on

cookware and waterproof, breathable membranes for clothing, and are used in many industry segments, including the

aerospace, automotive, building/construction, chemical processing, electronics, semiconductors, and textile industries. PFOA

can also be produced by the breakdown of some fluorinated telomers, substances that are used in surface treatment products to

impart soil, stain, grease, and water resistance. Some telomers are also used as high performance surfactants in products that

must flow evenly, such as paints, coatings, and cleaning products, fire-fighting foams for use on liquid fuel fires, or the

engineering coatings used in semiconductor manufacture. LCPFCs are found world-wide in the environment, wildlife, and

humans. They are bioaccumulative in wildlife and humans, and are persistent in the environment. To date, significant adverse

effects have not been found in the general human population; however, significant adverse effects have been identified in

laboratory animals and wildlife. Given the long half-life of these chemicals in humans (years), it can reasonably be anticipated

that continued exposure could increase body burdens to levels that would result in adverse outcomes.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term

Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2012 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/pfcs.html

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Toni Krasnic Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

305
Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-0984 

E-Mail: Krasnic.Toni@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Katherine Sleasman Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-7716 

FAX: 202 564-4773

E-Mail: sleasman.katherine@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ82

 View Related Documents

Title: Lead; Residential Lead Dust Hazard Standards

Abstract: On August 10, 2009, EPA was petitioned under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) to lower the residential

lead dust hazard standards. Pursuant to section 403 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA promulgate regulations

on January 5, 2001 (66 FR 1206) to establish standards for lead-based paint hazards in most pre-1978 housing and childoccupied facilities. Under these standards, lead is considered a hazard when equal to or exceeding 40 micrograms of lead in

dust per square foot on floors, 250 micrograms of lead in dust per square foot on interior window sills, and 400 parts per million

(ppm) of lead in bare soil in children's play areas or 1200 ppm average for bare soil in the rest of the yard. These standards

provide a regulatory threshold and it is important to note that given the potential dangers related to lead poisoning, any

exposure to deteriorated lead-based paint presents a hazard. In addition to this citizen's petition, the Clean Air Science Advisory

Committee (CASAC) has advised EPA that based on recent epidemiological studies the current hazard standards are

insufficiently protective. Therefore, based on the APA petition and CASAC recommendation, EPA will be analyzing current

science to determine if new standards are required under TSCA section 403.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2681

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2012 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009–0665

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/leadhaz.htm

Agency Contact: Christina Wadlington Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-1859 

FAX: 202 566-0469

E-Mail: Wadlington.Christina@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Erik Winchester Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-6450 

E-Mail: Winchester.Erik@epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

306
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AB79

 View Related Documents

Title: Test Rule; Certain Chemicals on the ATSDR Priority List of Hazardous Substances

Abstract: On October 20, 2006, (71 FR 61926), EPA proposed a Test Rule for Certain Chemicals on the Agency for Toxic

Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)/EPA Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act

(CERCLA) Priority List of Hazardous Substances for the consideration of testing for four chemicals (hydrogen and sodium

cyanide, chloroethane, and methylene chloride). The chemicals are listed on the ATSDR/EPA priority list of hazardous

substances which is compiled under the CERCLA. The chemicals are also listed as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) under

section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). In the proposal for this test rule, EPA explained that the principal reason EPA proposed

to use its Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 4 authority to obtain data was to support ATSDR’s Substance-Specific

Applied Research Program, a program for collecting data and other information needed for developing health assessments

pursuant to CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. section 9601 et seq. ATSDR had referred the chemicals subject to the proposed rule to EPA

under the authority of section 104(i) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. section 96040). Since then, ATSDR informed EPA that it no longer

needed EPA to finalize this rule. Therefore, EPA plans to withdraw the proposal. This withdrawal, however does not preclude

the Agency from initiating the same or similar rulemaking at a future date. EPA is currently developing efforts to strengthen the

Agency’s chemical management program under TSCA by ramping up efforts to assess, prioritize and take action on existing

chemicals. EPA may address potential concerns with these chemicals as part of this enhanced effort.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790-799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/20/2006 71 FR 61926 

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 12/18/2006 71 FR 75704 

Notice; Withdrawal 09/14/2010 75 FR 55728 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2006/October/Day20/a17569.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2002-0073

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Agency Contact: Robert Jones Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8161 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: Jones.Robert@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Karen Chu Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8773 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: chu.karen@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AC76

 View Related Documents

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

307
Title: Testing of Certain Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)

Abstract: The 1996 proposed Test Rule for Hazardous Air Pollutants proposed to require manufacturers and processors of

21 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) to test their chemicals for certain health effects. EPA also solicited proposals for Enforceable

Consent Agreements (ECAs) regarding the performance of pharmacokinetics studies which would permit extrapolation from oral

data to predict risk from inhalation exposure. The data would have primarily been used to implement several provisions of

section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), including determining residual risk, estimating risks associated with accidental releases

of chemicals, and determining whether or not substances should be removed from the CAA section 112(b)(1). EPA’s Office of

Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS), along with EPA’s Office of Research and Development (ORD), informed EPA that

it would not be prudent to expend resources to finalize this rule. EPA is also withdrawing this proposed action because the

original proposal was issued in 1996 and the Agency has determined that the record does not address recent scientific

information developed since the original proposal. This withdrawal, however, does not preclude the Agency from initiating the

same or similar rulemaking at a future date. EPA is currently developing efforts to strengthen the agency’s chemical

management program under Toxics Substances Control Act (TSCA) by ramping up efforts to assess, prioritize, and take action

on existing chemicals. As part of this enhanced effort EPA will consider how best to address potential concerns with these

chemicals, which would include using scientific information and data developed since the rule was proposed.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/26/1996 61 FR 33178 

Supplemental NPRM 12/24/1997 62 FR 67466 

Supplemental NPRM 2 04/21/1998 63 FR 19694 

Notice; Withdrawal 09/14/2010 75 FR 55728 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/1996/June/Day-26/pr24153DIR/pr-24153.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411

Agency Contact: John Schaeffer Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8173 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: Schaeffer.John@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Bob Jones Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8161 

FAX: 202 564-4765

E-Mail: jones.robert@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD53

 View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Policy Statement on Oversight of Transgenic Organisms (Including Plants)

Abstract: As a follow-up to the final Biotechnology Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) EPA is considering

whether to address TSCA oversight of transgenic plants and other organisms. Recent information indicates that transgenic

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

308
plants and other organisms are being developed for uses which appear to be subject to TSCA jurisdiction. For example, plants

are being genetically modified to produce industrial grade, rather than food grade, oils. Many of these plants are subject to

oversight by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture while being tested in

the environment. Following APHIS approval of a petition for non-regulated status filed pursuant to APHIS' regulations

implementing the Federal Plant Pest Act at 7 CFR part 340, however, these plants cease to be subject to regulation by USDA.

Additionally, transgenic animals that are not under the jurisdiction of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) appear to be subject

to TSCA. Such animals may be genetically improved livestock for commercial purposes. The policy statement would address

whether EPA should exercise jurisdiction under TSCA over such transgenic organisms prior to their commercial use.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 09/10/2010 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4598

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Organizations Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/

Sectors Affected: 112; 325; 111; 113; 326

Agency Contact: Ken Moss Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-9232 

FAX: 202 564-9490

E-Mail: moss.kenneth@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ15

 View Related Documents

Title: Effects of Transfers of Ownership on Obligations Under Section 5 of TSCA

Abstract: Companies frequently transfer ownership or other rights with respect to a chemical substance to a different

company or person. These transfers may have regulatory implications because of the transferor's earlier submittal under the

Toxic Substances Control Act (the "Act") of a premanufacture notice, a significant new use notice or an exemption notice to

EPA for the chemical substance. The Agency has not always required the transferee to submit a new notice and has allowed

the transferee to manufacture the chemical substance under the original company's authorization. Because there are no rules or

definitive guidance concerning the procedures regarding transfer of ownership, this issue has not been addressed in a clear and

consistent manner. Furthermore, it is not always clear when the transferee is liable under the Act to the same extent as the

transferor. Therefore, to clarify these issues, EPA is considering whether to adopt a rule to accomplish several purposes: (1) to

provide a clear procedural mechanism to address such transfers; (2) to require the transferee to specifically assume all of the

legal obligations associated with the transferred right to manufacture; and (3) to provide notice to the Agency of a proposed

transfer thereby allowing the Agency to engage in more meaningful compliance monitoring.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

309
Withdrawn 09/10/2010 

Additional Information: SAN No. 4975

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppts/

Sectors Affected: 325

Agency Contact: Roy Seidenstein Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-9274 

FAX: 202 564-9490

E-Mail: seidenstein.roy@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Greg Schweer Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-8469 

FAX: 202 564-9094

E-Mail: Schweer.Greg@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ29

 View Related Documents

Title: Pesticide Agricultural Container Recycling Program

Abstract: EPA is suspending consideration of the development of a proposal to require registrants of agricultural and

professional specialty pesticides to recycle certain plastic containers.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 165 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 to 136y

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 09/10/2010 

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0688

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32532

Agency Contact: Jeanne Kasai Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 703 308-3240 

FAX: 703 308-3259

E-Mail: kasai.jeanne@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Nancy Fitz Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7506P

Washington , DC 20460 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

310
Phone: 703 305-7385 

FAX: 703 308-3259

E-Mail: fitz.nancy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ36

 View Related Documents

Title: Mercury; Significant New Use Rule for Elemental Mercury in Flow Meters, Manometers, and Pyrometers

Abstract: Elemental mercury has been used in many industrial and consumer applications, due to its unique properties.

Certain uses of elemental mercury can lead to releases to the environment during manufacturing, recycling, or disposal. Under

certain conditions, mercury in the environment can cause adverse effects in humans and wildlife. Some State governments have

restricted certain uses of mercury use and have requested federal action to bolster these efforts. In 2006, EPA committed to

pursue reductions in mercury used in switches, relays, and measuring devices. In 2007, EPA issued a Significant New Use Rule

(SNUR) for elemental mercury used in certain switches previously installed in motor vehicles. EPA has now identified three

more discontinued uses of mercury that have cost-effective alternatives. The discontinued uses of mercury are used in flow

meters, manometers on oil and gas pipelines, and pyrometers. The SNUR would require persons to notify EPA at least 90 days

before commencing the manufacture or processing of mercury for these three uses.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: TSCA section 5(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/11/2009 74 FR 46707 

Final Action 07/21/2010 75 FR 42330 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/2009/September/Day11/t21894.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0483

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/mercury/

Sectors Affected: 334513

Agency Contact: Peter Gimlin Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0515 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: gimlin.peter@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0514 

FAX: 202 566-0473

E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ55

 View Related Documents

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

311
Title: Lead; Amendment to the Opt-Out and Recordkeeping Provisions in the Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program

Abstract: As part of a lawsuit settlement, EPA agreed to make several revisions to the 2008 Lead Renovation, Repair, and

Painting Program (RRP) rule that established accreditation, training, certification, and recordkeeping requirements as well as

work practice standards on persons performing renovations for compensation in most pre-1978 housing and child-occupied

facilities. In October of 2009, EPA proposed amendments to the opt-out provision that currently exempts a renovator from the

training and work practice requirements of the rule when he or she obtains a certification from the owner of a residence he or

she occupies that no child under age 6 or pregnant women resides in the home and the home is not a child-occupied facility.

EPA also proposed revisions that involve renovation firms providing the owner with a copy of the records they are currently

required to maintain to demonstrate compliance with the training and work practice requirements of the RRP rule and, if

different, providing the information to the occupant of the building being renovated or the operator of the child-occupied facility.

In addition to the proposed amendments, EPA considered various minor amendments to the regulations concerning training

provider accreditations, renovator certifications and State and Tribal program requirements. In May, 2010, EPA published a final

rule eliminating the opt-out provision and finalizing the other provisions.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601(c); 15 USC 2682(c)(3); 15 USC 2684; 15 USC 2686; 15 USC 2687

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/28/2009 74 FR 55506 

Final Action 05/06/2010 75 FR 24802 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a4cb0c; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOPPT-2005-0049

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/renovation.htm

Agency Contact: Marc Edmonds Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0758 

E-Mail: Edmonds.Marc@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Michelle Price Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7404T

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 566-0744 

E-Mail: Price.Michelle@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ59

 View Related Documents

Title: Amendments to the Procedural Rules for Enforceable Consent Agreements (ECAs)

Abstract: On September 16, 2010, EPA published a final rule amending the procedures for developing Enforceable Consent

Agreements (ECAs) to generate test data under the Toxic Substances Control ACT (TSCA). the main features of the ECA

process amended by the final rule include when and how to initiate negotiations and inserting a fire deadline at which

negotiations will terminate. The final rule also deleted, modified, or consolidated several sections of the 40 CFR part 790 to

place the ECA provision in one section and the Interagency Testing Committee (ITC) provisions in a separate section, to make

it clearer that there is one ECA negotiation procedure applicable to all circumstances when an ECA would be appropriate. The

final rule also made conforming changes in other sections that reference the ECA procedures.

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

312
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/19/2010 75 FR 7428 

NPRM Comment Period End 03/22/2010 

Final Action 09/16/2010 75 FR 56472 

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480aa83c8; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOPPT-2009-0894

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information

URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/

Agency Contact: Jessica Barkas Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 250-8880 

E-Mail: Barkas.Jessica@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Mike Mattheisen Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

7405M

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 564-3077 

E-Mail: mattheisen.mike@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Office of the Administrator ( AdmO ) RIN: 2090-AA37

 View Related Documents

Title: Age Discrimination Regulations—EPA-Assisted Programs—Age Discrimination Act of 1975

Abstract: The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 prohibits discrimination based on age in programs or activities that receive

Federal financial assistance, and requires Federal agencies to issue regulations implementing the Act. Recipients are aware of

this prohibition and are already in compliance with this requirement. This amendment will add Age as a protected classification

to EPA's nondiscrimination regulations (40 CFR part 7), which already prohibit discrimination based on race, color, national

origin, sex or handicap in EPA-assisted programs or activities pursuant to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, section 504 of

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and section 13 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 7.10 to 7.180 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6101 et seq.

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 06/04/2010 75 FR 31702 

NPRM 06/04/2010 75 FR 31738 

NPRM Comment Period End 08/03/2010 

Direct Final Rule Effective 10/04/2010 

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

313
Additional Information: EPA publication information: Direct Final Action -

http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480afbb0c

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 924

Agency Contact: Thomas Walker Environmental Protection Agency

Office of the Administrator

1201A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9680 

FAX: 202 233-0630

E-Mail: walker.tom@epa.gov

Agency Contact: Helena Wooden-Aguilar Environmental Protection Agency

Office of the Administrator

1201A

Washington , DC 20460 

Phone: 202 343-9681 

FAX: 202 233-0630

E-Mail: Wooden-Aguilar.Helena @epa.gov

Regulations.gov Monday, December 20, 2010 Unified Agenda

314