alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 6, 2011                                                |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                             |   |
| /s/ Alton L. Boynton                                             |   |
| Alton L. Boynton                                                 |   |
| President and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer |   |
| Principal Financial and Accounting Officer                       |   |

----
#### § 19-8.10 Staff review.

The OAI staff will review the carrier procedures and practices and may request modifications or the use of special procedures necessary to improve the sample or to bolster the controls for accuracy and reliability.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2018-0132, 88 FR 6160, Jan. 31, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                   6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         212,931                 212,931
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,887,813               1,887,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    177,234                 177,234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,507,212               2,507,212
<PP&E>                                       8,618,580               8,618,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                 427,059                 836,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,634,093              16,634,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,369,269              15,369,269
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     5,655,452               5,655,452
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,634,093              16,634,093
<SALES>                                      2,016,526               3,581,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,016,526               3,581,752
<CGS>                                        2,845,790               4,592,777
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,265,194               2,309,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                 183,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (275,561)               (421,776)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,528,990)             (4,176,592)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,528,900)             (4,176,592)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,528,990)             (4,176,592)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.385)                 (0.664)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.385)                 (0.664)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP00-59-001]

On May 11, 2000, the Office of Energy Projects staff will be conducting a precertificate inspection of the facilities proposed by Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C. (Petal) in the above-referenced docket. The inspection will begin at Petal's existing plant site near Hattiesburg, in Forrest County, Mississippi, at approximately 1:00 p.m., and proceed to examine the proposed new compressor station and pipeline route on the ground via automobile.

All parties may attend. Those planning to attend must provide their own transportation.

For further information, please contact Paul McKee of the Commission's Office of External Affairs at (202) 208-1088.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11349 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 33.77 Foreign object ingestion—ice.

(a) Compliance with the requirements of this section must be demonstrated by engine ice ingestion test or by validated analysis showing equivalence of other means for demonstrating soft body damage tolerance.

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Ingestion of ice under the conditions of this section may not—

(1) Cause an immediate or ultimate unacceptable sustained power or thrust loss; or

(2) Require the engine to be shutdown.

(d) For an engine that incorporates a protection device, compliance with this section need not be demonstrated with respect to ice formed forward of the protection device if it is shown that—

(1) Such ice is of a size that will not pass through the protective device;

(2) The protective device will withstand the impact of the ice; and

(3) The ice stopped by the protective device will not obstruct the flow of induction air into the engine with a resultant sustained reduction in power or thrust greater than those values defined by [paragraph (c)](/on/2024-09-19/title-14/section-33.77#p-33.77(c)) of this section.

(e) Compliance with the requirements of this section must be demonstrated by engine ice ingestion test under the following ingestion conditions or by validated analysis showing equivalence of other means for demonstrating soft body damage tolerance.

(1) The minimum ice quantity and dimensions will be established by the engine size as defined in Table 1 of this section.

(2) The ingested ice dimensions are determined by linear interpolation between table values, and are based on the actual engine's inlet hilite area.

(3) The ingestion velocity will simulate ice from the inlet being sucked into the engine.

(4) Engine operation will be at the maximum cruise power or thrust unless lower power is more critical.

Table 1—Minimum Ice Slab Dimensions Based on Engine Inlet Size

| Engine Inlet Hilite area (sq. inch) | Thickness (inch) | Width (inch) | Length (inch) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 3.6 |
| 80 | 0.25 | 6 | 3.6 |
| 300 | 0.25 | 12 | 3.6 |
| 700 | 0.25 | 12 | 4.8 |
| 2800 | 0.35 | 12 | 8.5 |
| 5000 | 0.43 | 12 | 11.0 |
| 7000 | 0.50 | 12 | 12.7 |
| 7900 | 0.50 | 12 | 13.4 |
| 9500 | 0.50 | 12 | 14.6 |
| 11300 | 0.50 | 12 | 15.9 |
| 13300 | 0.50 | 12 | 17.1 |
| 16500 | 0.5 | 12 | 18.9 |
| 20000 | 0.5 | 12 | 20.0 |

[Doc. No. 16919, [49 FR 6852](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/49-FR-6852), Feb. 23, 1984, as amended by Amdt. 33-19, [63 FR 14798](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/63-FR-14798), Mar. 26, 1998; [63 FR 53278](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/63-FR-53278), Oct. 5, 1998; Amdt. 33-20, [65 FR 55856](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/65-FR-55856), Sept. 14, 2000; Amdt. 33-34, [79 FR 65537](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/79-FR-65537), Nov. 4, 2014]
§ 25.1019 Oil strainer or filter. ( a ) Each turbine engine installation must incorporate an oil strainer or filter through which all of the engine oil flows and which meets the following requirements: ( 1 ) Each oil strainer or filter that has a bypass must be constructed and installed so that oil will flow at the normal rate through the rest of the system with the strainer or filter completely blocked.
( 2 ) The oil strainer or filter must have the capacity (with respect to operating limitations established for the engine) to ensure that engine oil system functioning is not impaired when the oil is contaminated to a degree (with respect to particle size and density) that is greater than that established for the engine under Part 33 of this chapter.
( 3 ) The oil strainer or filter, unless it is installed at an oil tank outlet, must incorporate an indicator that will indicate contamination before it reaches the capacity established in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 4 ) The bypass of a strainer or filter must be constructed and installed so that the release of collected contaminants is minimized by appropriate location of the bypass to ensure that collected contaminants are not in the bypass flow path.
( 5 ) An oil strainer or filter that has no bypass, except one that is installed at an oil tank outlet, must have a means to connect it to the warning system required in § 25.1305(c)(7).
( b ) Each oil strainer or filter in a powerplant installation using reciprocating engines must be constructed and installed so that oil will flow at the normal rate through the rest of the system with the strainer or filter element completely blocked.
[Amdt. 25-36, 39 FR 35461, Oct. 1, 1974, as amended by Amdt. 25-57, 49 FR 6848, Feb. 23, 1984]
§ 27.1583 Operating limitations. ( a ) *Airspeed and rotor limitations.* Information necessary for the marking of airspeed and rotor limitations on, or near, their respective indicators must be furnished. The significance of each limitation and of the color coding must be explained.
( b ) *Powerplant limitations.* The following information must be furnished: ( 1 ) Limitations required by § 27.1521.
( 2 ) Explanation of the limitations, when appropriate.
( 3 ) Information necessary for marking the instruments required by §§ 27.1549 through 27.1553.
( c ) *Weight and loading distribution.* The weight and center of gravity limits required by §§ 27.25 and 27.27, respectively, must be furnished. If the variety of possible loading conditions warrants, instructions must be included to allow ready observance of the limitations.
( d ) *Flight crew.* When a flight crew of more than one is required, the number and functions of the minimum flight crew determined under § 27.1523 must be furnished.
( e ) *Kinds of operation.* Each kind of operation for which the rotorcraft and its equipment installations are approved must be listed.
( f ) [Reserved]
( g ) *Altitude.* The altitude established under § 27.1527 and an explanation of the limiting factors must be furnished.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c) of the Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-2, 33 FR 965, Jan. 26, 1968; Amdt. 27-14, 43 FR 2325, Jan. 16, 1978; Amdt. 27-16, 43 FR 50599, Oct. 30, 1978]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-5093

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus SAMUEL NEAL HART, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-05-44) Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 26, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas N. Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Douglas Cannon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Samuel Neal Hart pled guilty to possession of ammunition by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000), and was sentenced as an armed career criminal to the mandatory minimum term of 180 months imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(e) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005). Hart appeals his sentence, contending that, under United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and Shepard v. United States , 544 U.S. 13 (2005), the sentence was imposed in violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. We affirm. Hart’s criminal record included felony convictions for multiple incidents of breaking and entering and arson committed in 1997; breaking and entering in 2003; and both kidnaping and assault with a deadly weapon in 2004. Hart does not dispute that he qualified for sentencing as an armed career criminal, but asserts that the sentence is unconstitutional because the indictment did not charge that he had three qualifying prior convictions committed on occasions different from one other, and because the necessary facts were neither proved by the government beyond a reasonable doubt nor admitted by him. Hart acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Thompson , 421 F.3d 278, 281-83 (4th Cir. 2005) (holding that judicial armed career criminal designation does not violate Fifth or Sixth Amendment under Booker or Shepard if “the facts necessary to support the enhancement- 3 - inhere in the fact of [the] conviction[s]”), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 1463 (2006). We therefore conclude that no error occurred and that the sentence was reasonable. We affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4460 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to waive 

certain eligibility requirements for a veteran to receive 

per diem payments for domiciliary care at a State home, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4460 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Veterans Homes 

3 Domiciliary Care Flexibility Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF 

5 VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR RECEIPT OF PER 

6 DIEM PAYMENTS FOR DOMICILIARY CARE AT 

7 STATE HOMES AND MODIFICATION OF ELIGI8 BILITY FOR SUCH PAYMENTS. 

9 (a) WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS.—Notwithstanding 

10 section 1741 of title 38, United States Code (as amended 

11 by subsection (b)), the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 

12 modify section 51.51(b) of title 38, Code of Federal Regu13 lations (or successor regulations), to provide the Secretary 

14 the authority to waive the requirements under such section 

15 51.51(b) for a veteran to be eligible for per diem payments 

16 for domiciliary care at a State home if— 

17 (1) the veteran has met not fewer than four of 

18 the requirements set forth in such section; or 

19 (2) such waiver would be in the best interest of 

20 the veteran. 

21 (b) MODIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY.—Section 

22 1741(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended, 

23 in the flush text following subparagraph (B), by striking 

24 ‘‘in a Department facility’’ and inserting ‘‘under the laws 

25 administered by the Secretary’’. 
3 

†S 4460 ES

1 (c) STATE HOME DEFINED.—In this section, the 

2 term ‘‘State home’’ has the meaning given that term in 

3 section 101(19) of title 38, United States Code. 

Passed the Senate December 8, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4460 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to 

care at a State home, and for other purposes. eran to receive per diem payments for domiciliary waive certain eligibility requirements for a vet-
#### § 29.1519 Weight and center of gravity.

The weight and center of gravity limitations determined under §§ 29.25 and 29.27, respectively, must be established as operating limitations.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M IC HAEL A. VILLALOB OS, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. TOM VILSAC K, Se c re ta ry , De pa rtm e nt of Agric ulture , (Fore st Se rvic e ), Age nc y , De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-17085 D.C . No. 3:12-c v-00138-M EJ M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia M a ria -Ele n a Ja m e s , M a gistra

te Judge , Pre siding ** Subm itte d April 22, 2015 *** B e fore : GOODW IN, B YB EE, a nd C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. M ic ha e l A. Villalobos a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r dism issing his em

ploy m e nt a c tion a lle g ing re ta lia tion a nd disc rim ination. W e have 

# F IL ED MAY01 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

rtie s c onse nte d to proc e e d be fore a m a gistra te judge . Se e28 U.S.C . § 636(c ).

*** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w for an a buse of disc re tion. Pagtalunan v. Galaza , 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th C i r. 2002) (dismissa l for fa ilure to c om ply with a c ourt orde r); He rnande

z v . C ity of El Monte , 138 F.3d 393, 398 (9th C ir. 1998) (dismissa l for fa ilure to prose c ute ). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

dism i ssing Villalobos’ a c tion without pre

judic e a fte r Villa lobos fa ile d to re s pond tim e ly to the distric t c ourt’ s orde r to show c a

u s e re ga rding his failure to prose c ute and m e e t c ourt de a dline s, de s pite be i ng wa rne d tha t fa ilure to re spond c ould re s ult in dism issa l. Se ePagtalunan , 291 F.3d a t 642 (se tting forth fa c t ors for a distric t c o urt to c onside r in de te rm ining whe the r to dismiss for fa ilure to c om ply with a c ourt orde r or fa i lure to prose c ute ); s e ealso He rnande z , 138 F.3d a

t 400-01 (a

pre sum ption of pre j udic e arise s from a

pla intiff’ s fa ilure to prose c ute or provide a non-frivolous e xc use for de la

y ); Ash v . C

v e tk ov , 739 F.2d 493, 497 (9th C ir. 1984) (“ [D] ism issa l without pre

judic e is a

m ore e a sily

justifie d sa

nc t ion for fa i lure to prose c ute .” ). W e do not c onside r m atte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f, or a

rgum e nts a

n d a lle g ations ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se ePadge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 7 0 8 5 2
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                 [LETTERHEAD OF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.]


Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
Wilmington, DE
March 26, 2001



Management Report on Internal Control Over Servicing of Securitized Automobile
Financing Receivables

Management of The Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. is responsible for establishing
and maintaining an effective system of internal control over servicing of
securitized automobile financing receivables, which is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the proper servicing of securitized automobile
financing receivables. The system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and
actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal
control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or
overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system
can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to servicing of securitized
automobile financing receivables. Further, because of changes in conditions, the
effectiveness of an internal control system may vary over time.

Management of The Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. assessed its system of internal
control over servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables as of
December 31, 2000 in relation to criteria for effective internal control
described in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2000, the Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of internal control over
servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables.

                                    /s/ Keith Schuck
                                    ------------------------------
                                    Keith Schuck
                                    Vice President
                                    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.