Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 87 / Thursday, May 4, 2000 / Notices 25941

infringe upon Constitutional rights of an

individual to own or possess a lawful

firearm. In accordance with Title 43,

Code of Federal Regulations Section

8365.1–6, the State Director may

establish supplementary rules in order

to provide for the protection of persons,

property and public lands and

resources. This authority was delegated

to the District Managers and Field

Managers pursuant to BLM Manual

1203, California Supplement. Failure to

comply with the proposed

supplementary rule would be

punishable by a fine not to exceed

$100,000 and/or imprisonment not to

exceed twelve months. The

environmental effects of the proposed

rule were analyzed separately by

Environmental Assessment CA–680–00–

29.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

BLM Barstow Field Office, 2601

Barstow Road, Barstow, CA 92231,

telephone (760) 252–6000.

Tim Read,

Field Manager.

[FR Doc. 00–11096 Filed 5–3–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–84–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337–TA–433]

In the Matter of Certain Safety Eyewear

and Components Thereof; Notice of

Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

complaint was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on

March 31, 2000, under section 337 of

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Bacou USA

Safety, Inc. and Uvex Safety

Manufacturing, Inc., both of Smithfield,

Rhode Island. Supplements to the

complaint were filed on April 18 and

19, 2000. The complaint, as

supplemented, alleges violations of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

and the sale within the United States

after importation of certain safety

eyewear and components thereof by

reason of (a) infringement of claims

1–5, 8–14, and 16–18 of U.S. Letters

Patent 5,457,505, (b) infringement of the

claim of U.S. Letters Patent Des. 322,616

and (c) misappropriation of trade dress,

the threat or effect of which is to destroy

or substantially injure an industry in the

United States. The complaint also

alleges that there exists an industry in

the United States with respect to the

asserted intellectual property.

The complainants request that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after a hearing, issue a permanent

exclusion order and a permanent cease

and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint and

supplements, except for any

confidential information contained

therein, are available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, SW, Room

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone

202–205–2000. Hearing-impaired

individuals are advised that information

on this matter can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s TDD

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons

with mobility impairments who will

need special assistance in gaining access

to the Commission should contact the

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may be obtained by

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steven A. Glazer, Esq., Office of Unfair

Import Investigations, U.S. International

Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–

2577.

Authority: The authority for institution of

this investigation is contained in section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10

(1999).

Scope of Investigation

Having considered the complaint, the

U.S. International Trade Commission,

on April 28, 2000, ordered that —

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine:

(a) whether there is a violation of

subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the

importation into the United States, the

sale for importation, or the sale within

the United States after importation of

certain safety eyewear and components

thereof by reason of infringement of

claims 1–5, 8–14, and 16–18 of U.S.

Letters Patent 5,457,505, or of the claim

of U.S. Letters Patent Des. 322,616, and

whether there exists an industry in the

United States as required by subsection

(a)(2) of section 337; or

(b) whether there is a violation of

subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 in the

importation into the United States, the

sale for importation, or the sale within

the United States after importation of

certain safety eyewear and components

thereof by reason of misappropriation of

trade dress, the threat or effect of which

is to destroy or substantially injure an

industry in the United States.

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainants are —

Bacou USA Safety, Inc., 10 Thurber

Boulevard, Smithfield, Rhode Island

02917

Uvex Safety Manufacturing, Inc., 10

Thurber Boulevard, Smithfield, Rhode

Island 02917

(b) The respondent is the following

company alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and is the party upon

which the complaint is to be served:

Crews, Inc., 5191 Hickory Hill Road,

Memphis, Tennessee 38141.

(c) Steven A. Glazer, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, SW, Room 401–K, Washington,

DC 20436, who shall be the Commission

investigative attorney, party to this

investigation; and

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

the Honorable Debra Morriss is

designated as the presiding

administrative law judge.

A response to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondent in

accordance with section 210.13 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a) of the

Commission’s Rules, such response will

be considered by the Commission if

received not later than 20 days after the

date of service by the Commission of the

complaint and the notice of

investigation. An extension of time for

submitting a response to the complaint

will not be granted unless good cause

therefor is shown.

Failure of the respondent to file a

timely response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and this

notice, and to authorize the

administrative law judge and the

Commission, without further notice to

the respondent, to find the facts to be as

alleged in the complaint and this notice

and to enter both an initial

determination and a final determination

containing such findings, and may

result in the issuance of a limited

exclusion order or a cease and desist

order or both directed against the

respondent.

25942 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 87 / Thursday, May 4, 2000 / Notices

By order of the Commission.

Issued: May 1, 2000.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–11168 Filed 5–3–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade

Commission

TIME AND DATE: May 9, 2000 at 11:00

a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W.,

Washington, DC 20436, Telephone:

(202) 205–2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Agenda

for future meeting: none

2. Minutes

3. Ratification List

4. Inv. Nos. 701–TA–318 and 731–

TA–538 and 561 (Review)(Sulfanilic

Acid from China and India)—briefing

and vote. (The Commission will

transmit its determination to the

Secretary of Commerce on May 18,

2000.)

5. Inv. Nos. 701–TA–286 and 731–

TA–365 (Review)(Industrial Phosphoric

Acid from Belgium and Israel)—briefing

and vote. (The Commission will

transmit its determination to the

Secretary of Commerce on May 22,

2000.)

6. Outstanding action jackets:

(1.) Document No. GC–00–020:

Administrative matters.

In accordance with Commission

policy, subject matter listed above, not

disposed of at the scheduled meeting,

may be carried over to the agenda of the

following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: May 1, 2000.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–11332 Filed 5–2–00; 3:48 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Justice

[OJP(NIJ)–1270]

Announcement of the Availability of

the National Institute of Justice

Solicitation for Evaluation of the

Comprehensive Indian Resources for

Community and Law Enforcement

(CIRCLE) Project

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs,

National Institute of Justice, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of solicitation.

SUMMARY: Announcement of the

availability of the National Institute of

Justice solicitation ‘‘Evaluation of the

Comprehensive Indian Resources for

Community and Law Enforcement

(CIRCLE) Project.’’

DATES: Proposals must be received by 5

p.m. ET, Friday, June 23, 2000.

ADDRESSES: National Institute of Justice,

810 Seventh Street, NW, Washington,

DC 20531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

a copy of the solicitation, please call

NCJRS 1–800–851–3420. For general

information about application

procedures for solicitations, please call

the U.S. Department of Justice Response

Center at 1–800–421–6770.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority

This action is authorized under the

Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1968, Sections 201–03, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. 3721–23 (1994).

Background

The National Institute of Justice (NIJ)

is soliciting proposals to conduct a

participatory evaluation of the

Comprehensive Indian Resources for

Community and Law Enforcement

(CIRCLE) Project, a U.S. Department of

Justice initiative designed to empower

Native American Communities to more

effectively fight crime, violence, and

substance abuse.

The CIRCLE Project is based on two

key principles:

(1) The CIRCLE tribal communities

will play the lead role, with assistance

from the Federal government, in

developing and implementing crime,

violence, and drug control efforts.

(2) The problems to be addressed

require a comprehensive approach that

incorporates coordinated and multidisciplinary efforts.

This evaluation will focus on the

development, implementation, and

outcomes of the CIRCLE Project at three

sites: Oglala Sioux Tribe, Northen

Cheyenne Tribe, and Zuni Pueblo.

An award totaling up to $270,000 will

be made available for this first 18 month

phase of the CIRCLE Project Evaluation.

Interested organizations should call

the National Criminal Justice Reference

Service (NCJRS) at 1–800–851–3420 to

obtain a copy of ‘‘Evaluation of the

Comprehensive Indian Resources for

Community and Law Enforcement

(CIRCLE) Project’’ (refer to document

no. SL000417). For World Wide Web

access, connect to either NIJ at http://

www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/funding.htm, or

the NCJRS Justice Information Center at

http://www.ncjrs.org/fedgrant.htm#nij.

Dated: April 28, 2000.

Julie E. Samuels,

Acting Director, National Institute of Justice.

[FR Doc. 00–11129 Filed 5–3–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary; Submission for

OMB Emergency Review; Comment

Request

April 28, 2000.

The Department of Labor has

submitted the following (see below)

information collection request (ICR),

utilizing emergency review procedures,

to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) for review and clearance in

accordance with the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995 Public Law 104–

12, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). OMB

approval has been requested by May 5,

2000. A copy of this ICR, with

applicable supporting documentation

may be obtained by calling the

Department of Labor Departmental

Clearance Officer, Ira Mills (202) 219–

5095 x129.

Comments and questions about the

ICR listed below should be forwarded to

the Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the

Employment and Training

Administration, Office of Management

and Budget, Room 10235, Washington,

D.C. 20503 (202) 395–7316.

The Office of Management and Budget

is particularly interested in comments

which:

• Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;