alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Smith & Davis Manuf’g Co. *v.*Mellon.

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.*

June 1, 1892.)

Patents for Inventions—Public Use—Bed Bottoms.

Letters patent No. 269,242, issued December 19, 1882, to J. G-. Smith for an improvement in bed bottoms, are void because bed bottoms having all the material elements of the invention were in public use and on sale for more than two years prior to the application.

In Equity. Bill by the Smith & Davis Manufacturing Company against Mellon for infringement of letters patent No. 269,242, issued December 19, 1882, to John G. Smith for an improvement in bed bottoms. Bill dismissed.

*William M.*Eccles, for complainant.

*George H. Knight,*for defendant.

Thayer, District Judge,

(orally.) In view of the testimony the court is of the opinion that the invention covered by letters patent No. 269,-242 was in public use and on sale for more than two years prior to the date of the application for the patent, and that the patent is for that reason void. *Smith Co.*v. *Sprague,*123 U. S. 249, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 122; *Egbert*v. *Lippmann,*104 U. S. 333; *Mannings. Glue Co.,*108 U. S. 462, 2 Sup. Ct. Rep. 860; *Andrews*v. *Hovey,*123 U. S. 267, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 101. It hardly admits of a doubt that complainant made and sold wire bed bottoms which embodied all of the material features or elements of the *150invention for a period of more than two years prior to October 14, 1882, and that it did so not as an experiment, but for the purpose of realizing a profit.

The closing of the head of the spiral springs by passing the top wire around the second before extending it to form a hook cannot be regarded, under the specifications, as a material feature of the invention. That is merely a preferable mode of construction. The patentee' would be entitled to claim (and no doubt would claim if there was 'occasion to do so) that the use of a spring with an open head was an infringement of his patent as well as the use of a spring with a closed head. Bed bottoms embracing all of the material elements of the invention having been in public use and on sale for more than two years prior to the application, the patent is void, and the bill must be dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arch
Chemicals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael E. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/S/    MICHAEL E. CAMPBELL



Michael E. Campbell

Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2003





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Arch Chemicals, Inc. and will be retained by Arch Chemicals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 1 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 2 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 3 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 4 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 5 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 6 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 7 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 8 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 9 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 10 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 11 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3584-1 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 23:09:23 Desc:

Exhibit B- Detailed Time Entries Page 12 of 12
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-05-00664- CR
Re ne e Thom pso n, A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-04 -30 0061 , HO NORAB LE JULIE H. K OCUREK , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant’s br ief wa s orig inally due Nove mber 28, 2005. The time f o r fi l ing w as e xten de d thre e tim e s o n c ouns e l’ s mo tio n. On F e br ua ry 1, 20 06 , in

g ra nti ngthe thi rd

e xten sio n, thi s Court ordere d appellant’ s attorney , Mr. Walter C. Prentice, to file a brief on appellant’ s behalf no later tha n Fe bruar y 27, 2006. Counsel did not file a brief as orde red. The appea l is a

bated. The district court shall conduc t a hea ring to determine whether appellant desires to pr osecute this a ppeal and if so, whether

appellant’ s attorney , who was a ppointed by the cour t, has aba ndoned the a

ppeal. S ee T ex . R
. Ap p . P . 38.8(b)( 2). The c ourt shall make appropr iate finding s and rec ommendations. I f nec essar y , the cour

t shall appoint substi tute counsel wh o wi l l ef

fe ct i v el y re p re s en tap p el l an t . A re co rd fr o m t h i s h ea ri n g, i n cl u d i n g co p i es o f a l l fi n d i n gs2

and or de rs and

a tr ans c ri pti on

of the c ourt re po rt e r’ s n ote s, sh a ll b e fo rw ard e d to the Cle rk of thi s Court for filing as a suppleme ntal rec ord no later than April 17, 2006. Rule 38.8(b)( 3).

__________________________________________ Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P ury ear and Waldrop Filed: Mar ch 22, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.722 Answers to complaints.

Answers to the complaint may be filed within ten (10) days of the filing of the complaint, with service being made as provided in § 302.720.
----

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO **

**RULE        13a-14(1) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY        ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                  company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                  Luigi Dicicco                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Luigi                  DiCicco                           |
|   | Controller                  and Chief Accounting Officer |

----
§ 151.93 Buildings; utilities; sidewalks; parking areas; and landscaping. ( a ) Only buildings or parts of buildings intended to house facilities or activities directly related to the safety of persons at the airport, including fire and rescue equipment buildings, are eligible items under the Federal-aid Airport Program. To the extent they are necessary to house snow removal and abrasive spreading equipment, and to provide minimum protection for abrasive materials, field maintenance equipment buildings are eligible items in any airport development project for an airport in a location having a mean daily minimum temperature of zero degrees Fahrenheit, or less, for at least 20 days each year for the 5 years preceding the year when Federal aid is requested under § 151.21(a), based on the statistics of the U.S. Department of Commerce Weather Bureau if available, or other evidence satisfactory to the Administrator.
( b ) Airport utility construction, installation, and connection are eligible under the Federal-aid Airport Program as follows: ( 1 ) An airport utility serving only eligible areas and facilities is eligible; and
( 2 ) An airport utility serving both eligible and ineligible airport areas and facilities is eligible only to the extent of the additional cost of providing the capacity needed for eligible areas and facilities over and above the capacity necessary for the ineligible areas and facilities. However, a water system is eligible only to the extent necessary to provide fire protection for aircraft operations, and to provide water for a fire and rescue equipment building.
( c ) No part of the constructing, altering, or repairing (including grading, drainage, and other site preparation work) of a facility or area that is to be used as a public parking facility for passenger automobiles is eligible for inclusion in a project.
( d ) Landscaping is not eligible for inclusion in a project. However, the establishment of turf on graded areas and special treatment to prevent slope erosion is eligible to the extent of the eligibility of the facilities or areas served, preserved, or protected by the turf or treatment. In the case of turfing or treatment for an area or facility that is partly eligible and partly ineligible, the eligibility of the turfing or treatment is established on a pro rata basis.
( e ) The construction of sidewalks is not eligible for inclusion in a project.
[Doc. No. 1329, 27 FR 12357, Dec. 13, 1962, as amended by Amdt. 151-17, 31 FR 16525, Dec. 28, 1966; Amdt. 151-26, 33 FR 18434, Dec. 12, 1968]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10588]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE


Sunshine Act Meeting

Dates: Friday, May 5, 2000, 9:00 am-5:00 pm; Saturday, May 6, 2000, 
8:00 am-11:00 pm.

Place: Amelia Island Plantation, Amelia Island, FL.

Matters to be Considered: Consideration of proposals submitted for 
Institute funding and internal Institute business.

Portions Open to the Public: All matters.

Portions Closed to the Public: None.

Contact Person: David Tevelin, Executive Director, State Justice 
Institute, 1650 King Street, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22314, (703) 
684-6100.

David I. Tevelin,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 00-10588 Filed 4-25-00; 10:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-SC-M
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 6, 2011                                              |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |
| /s/ Alton L. Boynton                                             |
| Alton L. Boynton                                                 |
| President and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer |
| Principal Financial and Accounting Officer                       |

----
#### § 29.235 Taxiing condition.

The rotorcraft must be designed to withstand the loads that would occur when the rotorcraft is taxied over the roughest ground that may reasonably be expected in normal operation.
##### 



Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of the Company



|                                                        |  |                                                                                          |                                        |                                   
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|2003                                                   
|Caystar Holdings (100%) Cayman Islands                 
|                                                        |  | Bogoso Holdings (100%) Cayman Islands                                                   
|                                                        |  |                                                                                          | Bogoso Gold Limited (90%) Ghana       
|                                                        |  |                                                                                          |                                        | Prestea Underground JV (66%) Ghana
|                                                        |  | Wasford Holdings (100%) Cayman Islands                                                  
|                                                        |  |                                                                                          | Wexford Goldfields Limited (90%) Ghana
|                                                        |  | GSR Exploration Limited (100%) Ghana                                                    
|Société des Mines de Yaou & Dorlin ( SMYD) (50%) France
|Guyanor Ressources S.A. (72.9%) France                 
|                                                        |  | Société de Travaux Publics et de Mines Aurifères en Guyane (SOTRAPMAG) S.A.R.L. France
|                                                        |  | Société des Mines de Yaou & Dorlin S.A. ( SMYD) (50%) France
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3991 

To establish a special enrollment period for health plans offered on the 

Exchanges, in response to the public health emergency related to the 

coronavirus 2019. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2020 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To establish a special enrollment period for health plans 

offered on the Exchanges, in response to the public 

health emergency related to the coronavirus 2019. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coronavirus 2019 Spe5 cial Enrollment Period Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL ENROLLMENT PERIOD. 

7 Section 1311(c)(6) of the Patient Protection and Af8 fordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18031(c)(6)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3991 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

4 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(E) a special enrollment period that be7 gins on July 1, 2020, and ends on October 1, 

8 2020.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah

Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 9:54 AM

To: Ann V Howard

Cc: Mary-Ellen Walsh; Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: RE: Utah project and consultation with the AZSHPO

Ann,

Thank you for your response and I appreciate your feedback on the letter.

Have a wonderful day.

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: Ann V Howard [mailto:ahoward@azstateparks.gov]  

Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 8:59 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah <Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov>

Cc: Mary‐Ellen Walsh <mwalsh@azstateparks.gov>

Subject: Utah project and consultation with the AZSHPO

Dear Shaheerah, thank you for e-mailing us regarding the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility in San 

Juan County, Utah. However, you do not need to consult with the Arizona SHPO on undertakings located in 

states other than Arizona. Our office does not have any authority in other states; the SHPO of the respective 

state is the only SHPO with whom you need to consult if the undertaking is occurring in that state only. (If an 

undertaking is situated in more than one state, then you would need to consult with the SHPOs of all affected 

states.) 

I would also like to point out that the statement in your cover/transmittal letter that "EPA will consider the lack of reply to 

be Arizona State Historic Preservation Office agreement with the determination” does not follow the Section 106 

regulations. 800.5(2)(1) states that a SHPO/THPO's lack of response to an agency's finding of effect is to be 

considered a lack of response, not agreement with the finding of effect. 

Just FYI! Thank you for your understanding, Ann 

_______

Ann V. Howard

Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer / Archaeology

Phone: (602) 542-7138

Email: ahoward@azstateparks.gov

Web: http://AZStateParks.com
2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*William S. Brewer, Appellant.

(Submitted May 28, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*William S. Brewer,*in person, for appellant.

*William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney (Edwin J. Talley*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Httbbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Chester White, Appellant.

(Argued October 14, 1936;

decided December 1, 1936.)

*George H. Beaubian*and *Moxey A. Rigby*for appellant.

*Martin W. Littleton, Distrid Attorney (Philip Huntington*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
Exhibit
23.1  [PETERSON &
CO. LETTERHEAD]  The Board of
Directors
and Shareholders Composite Solutions, Inc. San Diego, CA  As the independent public accountants for Composite
Solutions, Inc. we hereby consent to the incorporation in this Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of Composite Solutions, Inc. of our report dated
December 27, 2002, regarding the September 30, 2002 and 2001,
consolidated financial statements. We also consent to all other references to
our company included in this annual report.   /s/ PETERSON & CO.
  PETERSON & CO.   December 27, 2002
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Report Request ID: 1011503 Report Code: AMP430 Aug. 10, 2012

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: YGX

State County City Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

06

06

095

097

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

88101

SELECTED OPTIONS

OZONE EVALUATION

AGENCY ROLE

MERGE PDF FILES

Option Type Option Value

SEASONAL-HOURLY

REPORTING

YES

SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Order Column

EPA_REGION

STATE_CODE

MONITOR_TYPE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

PARAMETER_CODE

POC

GLOBAL DATES

2011

Start Date End Date

01 12 2011

Tribal

Code
Aug. 10, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 1 of 3

MONITORS NOT REPORTING 
Aug. 10, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 2 of 3

DATE RANGE: 

REGION: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

California MONITOR TYPE: 

Bay Area Air Quality Management District

SLAMS

JAN. 01, 2011 THRU DEC. 31, 2011

SITE ID

CITY

ADDRESS

PARAMETER POC DURATION

METHOD

------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS -------------------------------

NUMBER / PERCENT

06-095-0004

06-095-0004

06-097-0003

88101

88101

88101

PM2.5 - Local Conditions

PM2.5 - Local Conditions

PM2.5 - Local Conditions

1

3

3

7

1

1

Vallejo

Vallejo

Santa Rosa

304 TUOLUMNE ST., VALLEJO

304 TUOLUMNE ST., VALLEJO

837 5TH ST., SANTA ROSA

145

170

170

31

740

739

 100%

 99%

 99%

21

667

669

 75%

 99%

 100%

740

724

 99%

 97%

718

717

 100%

 100%

739

739

 99%

 99%

718

705

 100%

 98%

742

741

 100%

 100%

743

569

 100%

 76%

526

709

 73%

 98%

741

743

 100%

 100%

714

711

 99%

 99%

742

741

 100%

 100%

52

8530

8507

 88%

 97%

 97%

MONITORS REPORTING 

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR

STATE:

REP ORG:
Aug. 10, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 3 of 3

DATE RANGE: 

REGION: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

California

MONITOR TYPE: 

Bay Area Air Quality Management District

SLAMS

JAN. 01, 2011 THRU DEC. 31, 2011

PARAMETER ACTIVE MONITORS # NOT REPORTING # MONITORS > 75% MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS

88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions 3 0 3 94.0%

3 0 3 94.0%

3 0 3 94.0%

3 0 3 94.0%

3 0 3 94.0%

3 0 3 94.0%

Bay Area Air Quality Management District

California

REGION SUMMARY: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

REPORT SUMMARY: 

MT SUMMARY: SLAMS

REPORT SUMMARY

STATE:

STATE SUMMARY: 

REP ORG:

RO SUMMARY: