alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 135.343 Crewmember initial and recurrent training requirements.

No certificate holder may use a person, nor may any person serve, as a crewmember in operations under this part unless that crewmember has completed the appropriate initial or recurrent training phase of the training program appropriate to the type of operation in which the crewmember is to serve since the beginning of the 12th calendar month before that service. This section does not apply to a certificate holder that uses only one pilot in the certificate holder's operations.

[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-18, 47 FR 33396, Aug. 2, 1982]
#### The People, *ex rel.*Fuller, *vs.*Oneida Common Pleas.

Where a relator, who has sued out a *mandamus,*removes from the state intermediate the issuing of the *alternative*and *peremptory*writ, proceedings will be stayed until security for costs be filed.

It is no answer to the motion, that the defendant, with knowledge of the removal of the re- . lator, had taken steps in the cause on his part.

The power of staying proceedings until security for costs be filed, is an incidental power, and may be exercised independent of the statute.

*J. A. Spencer*

moved to stay proceedings in a *mandamus*case until security for costs should be filed, because, after the alternative mandamus issued, the relator had removed to Michigan. He cited 10 *Wendell,*598; *2 R. S.*620, § 1, 2; *id.*586, § 54, *&c.; Jac. L. Dict. Mandamus ; Hallock’s Costs,*331, 332, 325, 439, 2 *R. S.*613, § 3, *sub.*3; *Laws of*1833, *p.*395, § 6; 2 *Wendell,*301; 3 *id.*304, 10 *id.*578.

*J. W. Jenkins*opposed,

because, after knowledge of the removal, the defend ants had taken steps in the cause by returning to the writ, taking a rule, receiv ing a demurrer, and interposing a rejoinder. He also insisted, that the statute requiring security does not extend to a suit by mandamus. He cited 1 *R. S.*347, § 1; *Graham's Pr.*80; *Anon,*(9 *Wendell,*472;) *Graham's Pr.*432; 5 *Barn.*& *Ald.*702, *and cases there cited.*

*By the Court,*

Cowen, J.

[653] The power of staying proceedings till security for *343costs shall be filed, is incidental, and was long exercised independent of the statute, and may still be so exercised. Mandamus is clearly within the principle of the common law power. Delay, and taking steps on the part of the defendant with knowledge, seems to be an answer to the motion by several English authorities, (*Graham's Pr.*507, *2d ed.,)*but has never been so received in this court. The contrary has been held in a like case. *(Jackson, ex dem. Williams,*v. *Miller,*3 *Cowen,*57.) Motion granted.
Exhibit 10.1
Gourmet Gifts, Inc.
Form 10-QSB
File No. 000-26017

                         PROMISSORY NOTE


It  is  hereby agreed on December 11th, 2000 that Gourmet  Gifts,
Inc.  (borrower) repay to Stanley K. Stilwell (lender) the amount
of $2,950.

It  is further agreed that the terms and conditions of this  note
shall be as follows:

1.   The  borrower will fully repay this note on  or  before  the
second anniversary of this date.

2.  The borrower agrees to pay the lender interest at the rate of
12% per year compounded annually until paid in full.  That if the
full two years is taken to repay the note that the amount due  to
the borrower on December 11, 2002 will be $3,700.48.

3.  It is mutually agreed that the borrower can at any time repay
the principal and accrued interest without penalty.

4.   It  is also mutually agreed that should the borrower default
on  any  part  of this note that borrower will pay all  costs  of
collection  including but not limited to court  costs  and  legal
expenses.


/s/ Johne Phelps
Gourmet Gifts, Inc.
By Johne Phlps, President


/s/ Stanley K. Stilwell
Stanley K. Stilwell
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Alton L. Boynton, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northwest
Biotherapeutics, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

      (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
            to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
            the end of the period covered by this report based on such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the
            registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
            fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2006

By: /s/ Alton L. Boynton
    ----------------------------------
    Alton L. Boynton
    President (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
Certification under Section 906



EXHIBIT 10.4 
 
02 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 
 
Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 
 
In connection with the periodic report of 02Micro
International Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Perry Kuo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: 
 
(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and 
 
(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 
 
This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
“filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 
 

	
	 Date: May 7, 2003
	 	 By:
	 	 /s/    PERRY
KUO        


	 	 	 	 	 Perry Kuo
 Chief Financial Officer


 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-2 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Participants Page 1 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-2 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Participants Page 2 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-2 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Participants Page 3 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-2 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Participants Page 4 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-2 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Participants Page 5 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-2 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Participants Page 6 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-2 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Participants Page 7 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-2 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Participants Page 8 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-2 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Participants Page 9 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-2 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Participants Page 10 of 10
§ 27.1041 General. ( a ) Each powerplant cooling system must be able to maintain the temperatures of powerplant components within the limits established for these components under critical surface (ground or water) and flight operating conditions for which certification is required and after normal shutdown. Powerplant components to be considered include but may not be limited to engines, rotor drive system components, auxiliary power units, and the cooling or lubricating fluids used with these components.
( b ) Compliance with paragraph (a) of this section must be shown in tests conducted under the conditions prescribed in that paragraph.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34213, Sept. 2, 1988]
| 1. | I      have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q      for the period ended June 30, 2008 of Playboy Enterprises, Inc.;      and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      February 20, 2009 | /s/      Jerome H. Kern |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                         | Name:                   | Jerome      H. Kern |
|                         | Title:                  | Interim      Chief Executive Officer |
PRACTICE.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

1898.]

Cox, Smith and Swing, JJ.

#### Patrick Cooney v. Edward Cooney.

Appellate Court Must Act upon the Record, Irrespective "of its Knowledge of Facts.

Appellate court reverses an order appointing a receiver, where bill of exceptions, allowed without the knowledge of opposite counsel, by inadvertance, omits evidence upon which appointment was leased, and contains only incompetent affidavits in opposition thereto, although satisfied from statements of counsel that the material allegations of plaintiff were sustained in the court below.

On Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

*Isaac B. Matson*and *Alfred B.*Benedict, for plaintiff in'error.

N *A. Miller,*contra.

Smith, J.

We regret that we are compelled to reverse the judgment or order of the court of common pleas appointing a receiver in this case. The allegations oí the petition of the plaintiff below, Edward Cooney, make a clear case,if true, for the appbintment of such a receiver, but the answer filed by the defendant below, denies each and every allegation of the petition ; the burden therefore was upon the plaintiff to show that the allegations of his petition were true. We are satisfied from what was said by counsel before us at the hearing of the case, that at the hearing-of the application for a receiver before the court of common pleas, the material allegations of the petition were conceded to be true, and on the part of the defendant the only evidence produced was a number of affidavits, which constituted no defense to the claim of the plaintiff, and consisted principally of a course and scurrilous attack on the character of the plaintiff.

A bill of exceptions, however, was allowed by the trial judge without the knowledge of counsel for plaintiff below, as is claimed, doubtless by inadvertance, which purports to contain all of the evidence, but which does not contain any evidence offered by plaintiff or any admission made in court at the hearing by defendant’s counsel, and only contains the affidavits of the defendant referred to. Of course on the record there is no evidence to support the averments of the petition and the order appointing the receiver must be reversed.
#### §§ 794.104-794.109 [Reserved]
§ 35.16 Propeller critical parts. The integrity of each propeller critical part identified by the safety analysis required by § 35.15 must be established by: ( a ) A defined engineering process for ensuring the integrity of the propeller critical part throughout its service life,
( b ) A defined manufacturing process that identifies the requirements to consistently produce the propeller critical part as required by the engineering process, and
( c ) A defined service management process that identifies the continued airworthiness requirements of the propeller critical part as required by the engineering process.
[Amdt. 35-9, 78 FR 4042, Jan. 18, 2013]
#### § 27.691 Autorotation control mechanism.

Each main rotor blade pitch control mechanism must allow rapid entry into autorotation after power failure.
T he H onor abl e J os eph H
. R odr i guez, Seni orU ni t ed St at es D i s tr i ctJudge forthe D i s tr i ct * of N ew J er s ey , s i tt i ng bydes i gnat i on. U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT M ar ch 25, 2010 N o. 09- 2312 SING LE EM PLOY ER W ELFARE BEN EFI T PLAN TR UST, A p p e l l a n t
v. DAT AL INK E L E CT RO NI CS , INC ; YOS S I L E V; DA VI D R . NESTE; GEN ERA L AM ERI CA N LI FE INSU RA NC E CO M P ANY; S I M ON S INGE R; J E F F RE Y L . DAVI DS ON

( E . D . Pa N o. 2- 09- cv- 00377) Pr es ent : SC I R I C A , C hi ef Judge, and C H A G A R E S, C i r cui tJudges , and R O D R I G U E Z , D i s tr i ctJudge. * M o ti o n b yA p p ell ee s fo r C lari fica ti o n o f th e O p inion o f th e C o u rt of M ar ch 24, 2010. / s / C ai t l yn J . G i l l i e C as e M anage r( 267) 299- 4956 R es pons e due 04/ 05/ 10 O R D E R T he for egoi ng m ot i on byappel l ees forcl ar i fi cati on of the opi ni on of the C ourtof M ar ch 24, 2010, co n stru ed b ythe C o u rtas a m o ti o n to am en dthe C o u rt ’s op inion , is gran ted. T h e O p inion o f th e C o u rt fi l ed M arch 24 , 20 10 , i s am end ed as fo l l ow s: P age 2 , l i ne 1 8, fi rs tsent ence thatreads: “ T h e T ru st is a m u ltip le e m p lo y e r w e lf a re b e n e f it p lan tru st a d m in iste re din Penns y l vani a t o fund death benef i t s t o empl oy er s thr oughoutthe U ni t ed S ta te s .” s hal l r ead: “T h e C o m p lai n t al so all eg es th at th e T rust is a m u ltiple em p loy er w elfa re b e n e f it p lan tru st a d m in iste re dinP e n n sy lv a n ia to f u n dd e a th b e n e f

its to e m p lo y e rs th ro u g h o u t th e U n ite dS ta te s .” B yth e C o u rt, / s /J os eph H
. R odr i guez D i s tr i ctJudge D A T E D : A pr i l 19, 2010
§ 29.1583 Operating limitations. ( a ) *Airspeed and rotor limitations.* Information necessary for the marking of airspeed and rotor limitations on or near their respective indicators must be furnished. The significance of each limitation and of the color coding must be explained.
( b ) *Powerplant limitations.* The following information must be furnished: ( 1 ) Limitations required by § 29.1521.
( 2 ) Explanation of the limitations, when appropriate.
( 3 ) Information necessary for marking the instruments required by §§ 29.1549 through 29.1553.
( c ) *Weight and loading distribution.* The weight and center of gravity limits required by §§ 29.25 and 29.27, respectively, must be furnished. If the variety of possible loading conditions warrants, instructions must be included to allow ready observance of the limitations.
( d ) *Flight crew.* When a flight crew of more than one is required, the number and functions of the minimum flight crew determined under § 29.1523 must be furnished.
( e ) *Kinds of operation.* Each kind of operation for which the rotorcraft and its equipment installations are approved must be listed.
( f ) *Limiting heights.* Enough information must be furnished to allow compliance with § 29.1517.
( g ) *Maximum allowable wind.* For Category A rotorcraft, the maximum allowable wind for safe operation near the ground must be furnished.
( h ) *Altitude.* The altitude established under § 29.1527 and an explanation of the limiting factors must be furnished.
( i ) *Ambient temperature.* Maximum and minimum ambient temperature limitations must be furnished.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 971, Jan. 26, 1968; Amdt. 29-15, 43 FR 2327, Jan. 16, 1978; Amdt. 29-17, 43 FR 50602, Oct. 30, 1978; Amdt. 29-24, 49 FR 44440, Nov. 6, 1984]
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*Bridge Auto Renting Corporation, Respondent.

(Argued October 22, 1936;

decided November 24, 1936.)

*638
      *Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (Paxton Blair*and *Francis J. Bloustein*of counsel), for appellant.

*Thomas I. Sheridan*and *Harry C. Kane*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4159 

To amend the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act 

to accommodate emerging technologies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 2, 2020 

Mr. THUNE (for himself, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Electronic Signatures in Global and National 

Commerce Act to accommodate emerging technologies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘E-SIGN Modernization 

5 Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC 

7 DISCLOSURES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title I of the Electronic Signa9 tures in Global and National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 

10 7001 et seq.) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4159 IS

1 (1) in section 101(c) (15 U.S.C. 7001(c))— 

2 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking subpara3 graphs (C) and (D) and inserting the following: 

4 ‘‘(C) the consumer, prior to consenting, is 

5 provided with a statement of the hardware and 

6 software requirements for access to and reten7 tion of the electronic records; and 

8 ‘‘(D) after the consent of a consumer in 

9 accordance with subparagraph (A), if a change 

10 in the hardware or software requirements need11 ed to access or retain electronic records creates 

12 a material risk that the consumer will not be 

13 able to access or retain a subsequent electronic 

14 record that was the subject of the consent, the 

15 person providing the electronic record provides 

16 the consumer with a statement of— 

17 ‘‘(i) the revised hardware and soft18 ware requirements for access to and reten19 tion of the electronic records; and 

20 ‘‘(ii) the right to withdraw consent 

21 without the imposition of any fees for such 

22 withdrawal and without the imposition of 

23 any condition or consequence that was not 

24 disclosed under subparagraph (B)(i).’’; 

25 (B) by striking paragraph (3); and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4159 IS

1 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), 

2 and (6) as paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), respec3 tively; and 

4 (2) by striking section 105 (15 U.S.C. 7005). 

5 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec6 tion, or the amendments made by this section, may be con7 strued as affecting the consent provided by any consumer 

8 under section 101(c) of the Electronic Signatures in Glob9 al and National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7001(c)) before 

10 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### § 33.11 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes the general design and construction requirements for reciprocating and turbine aircraft engines.