alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON FORM 10KSB FOR
YEAR ENDED 12/31/1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1030049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   514699
<ALLOWANCES>                                     17516
<INVENTORY>                                     310189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1880762
<PP&E>                                         5190757
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2182395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4957689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2390260
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         36394
<OTHER-SE>                                       31035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4957689
<SALES>                                        3230729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3259418
<CGS>                                          2216737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2989212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 17516
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1325013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (3245546)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (3246346)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (3246346)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4452 

To prohibit Federal employees from downloading or using WeChat on 

Government devices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 5, 2020 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal employees from downloading or using 

WeChat on Government devices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘WeChat No More Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FROM 

6 DOWNLOADING OR USING WECHAT ON GOV7 ERNMENT DEVICES. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

9 (1) the terms ‘‘congressional employee’’, ‘‘Gov10 ernment corporation’’, ‘‘Member of Congress’’, and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4452 IS

1 ‘‘officer’’ have the meanings given such terms in sec2 tion 2107, 103, 2106, and 2104 of title 5, United 

3 States Code, respectively; and 

4 (2) the term ‘‘Federal employee’’— 

5 (A) means an employee of any establish6 ment or office in the executive, legislative, or 

7 judicial branch of the Federal Government; and 

8 (B) includes a congressional employee. 

9 (b) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in subsection 

10 (c), no Federal employee, officer, Member of Congress, or 

11 officer or employee of a Government corporation may 

12 download or use on any device issued or provided by the 

13 United States or a Government corporation WeChat, or 

14 any successor application that is developed by Tencent 

15 Holdings Limited, an entity owned by Tencent Holdings 

16 Limited, a successor to Tencent Holdings Limited, or an 

17 entity owned by a successor to Tencent Holdings Limited. 

18 (c) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (b) shall not apply to 

19 downloading or using an application on a device issued by 

20 the United States or a Government corporation in connec21 tion with the duties of a Federal employee, officer, Mem22 ber of Congress, or officer or employee of a Government 

23 corporation relating to cybersecurity research, conducting 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4452 IS

1 an investigation, pursuing an enforcement action, a dis2 ciplinary action, or an intelligence activity. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
8 Entered:08/31/18 17:28:51 Desc:

 of 1
§ 31.57 Rip cords. ( a ) If a rip cord is used for emergency deflation, it must be designed and installed to preclude entanglement.
( b ) The force required to operate the rip cord may not be less than 25, or more than 75, pounds.
( c ) The end of the rip cord to be operated by the pilot must be colored red.
( d ) The rip cord must be long enough to allow an increase of at least 10 percent in the vertical dimension of the envelope.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5618]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-04]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in closed session:
    Location: OCC--250 E Street SW., Room 8C, Washington, DC 20219.
    Date: March 14, 2012.
    Time: Immediately following the ASC open session.
    Status: Closed.
    Matters To Be Considered:

February 8, 2012 minutes--Closed Session.
Preliminary discussion of State Compliance Reviews.

    Dated: March 2, 2012.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-5618 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit 10.14


 


 


EXTENSION
AGREEMENT


 


 


Bank of America, N.A.,


as Administrative Agent


231 South LaSalle Street


Chicago, Illinois 60604


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


The undersigned hereby
agrees to extend, effective April 3, 2003, its Commitment and the Maturity Date
under the Credit Agreement dated as of April 3, 2001, among SOURCECORP,
Incorporated (formerly known as F.Y.I., Incorporated), each of the Lenders
party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Banc of
America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book agent (as the same
has been amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit
Agreement”) for 364 days to April 1, 2006, pursuant to Section 2.1(d)
of the Credit Agreement.  Terms defined
in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined.


 


This Extension Agreement
shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State of
Texas.  This Extension Agreement may be
signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with
the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same
instrument.


 


	
  WELLS
  FARGO BANK, N.A.

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/David C. Oldani

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  David C. Oldani

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Vice President

  



 


 


 


Agreed and Accepted:


 


	
  SOURCECORP, INCORPORATED

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/Barry L. Edwards

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Barry L. Edwards

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  EVP & CFO

  
	
   

  
	
  BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as
  Administrative Agent

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/Suzanne M. Paul

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Suzanne M. Paul

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Vice President
§ 142.5 Certificate and training specifications required. ( a ) No person may operate a certificated training center without, or in violation of, a training center certificate and training specifications issued under this part.
( b ) An applicant will be issued a training center certificate and training specifications with appropriate limitations if the applicant shows that it has adequate facilities, equipment, personnel, and courseware required by § 142.11 to conduct training approved under § 142.37.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6798
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARLOS VANCE REID, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:99-cr-00460-PMD; 2:06-cv-00202-PMD) Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 31, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carlos Vance Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Brent Alan Gray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Carlos Vance Reid seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reid has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Reid’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report), I, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (a) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (a) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald E. Klingle                                   
|Ronald E. Klingle Chief Executive Officer April 14, 2005
#### § 147.15 Training provided at another location.

A certificated aviation maintenance technician school may provide training at any fixed location other than its primary location, provided the additional training location meets the requirements of this part and is listed in the certificate holder's operations specifications.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Banking Act of 1933

              																	United States. Congress					 and 	Seventy-Third Congress, 1933-1935. 						*Banking Act of 1933 : Conference Report (To Accompany H.R. 5661)*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										June 12, 1933,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/995,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Phone Log for Atrazine Special Review Docket 

Page 1 of 1

February 10, 2011, afternoon 

Dan Campbell of Syngenta and Melanie Biscoe of EPA/OPP talked over the phone. 

During this conversation, Dan Campbell indicated the atrazine well vulnerability study 

would be submitted at the end of April 2011 along with other studies being conducted by 

Syngenta. 

Phone Log prepared by – Melanie Biscoe
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 October 20, 2005 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-11429

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-00287-CR-A-N

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HENRY LEE GORDON, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Alabama

_________________________

(October 20, 2005)

Before BIRCH, BARKETT and FAY, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:
2

 Jay Lewis, appointed counsel for Henry Lee Gordon, Jr., has filed a motion to

withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the

record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gordon’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Playboy  Enterprises,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Christie Hefner, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Linda G. Havard,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christie Hefner
-------------------
Name: Christie Hefner
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:   May 10, 2006


/s/ Linda Havard
----------------
Name: Linda G. Havard
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:   May 10, 2006

This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A  signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by ss.  906 has been
provided  to  Playboy  Enterprises,   Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Playboy
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.2











                CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

As  independent  petroleum  consultants to The Houston  Exploration  Company and
KeySpan Exploration and Production,  LLC, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report included in this form 10-K of KeySpan Corporation and into KeySpan
Corporation's  previously filed  Registration  Statements File Nos.:  333-53657,
333-53765,  333-920003,  333-79151,  333-40472, 333-43768, 333-60294, 333-82230,
333-104230, 333-119491 and 333-119474.



                                        NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.





                                        By: /s/Danny D. Simmons
                                            -------------------
                                            Danny D. Simmons
                                            Executive Vice President


Houston, Texas
February 25, 2005
#### Leopold Zimmermann et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Zimmermann *&*Forshay, Respondents, *v.*The Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Company, Appellant.

(Argued October 5, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*567*William, S. Gregg, Charles L. Woody, Charles A. Rittenhouse, 3d, Joshua D. Jones*and *W. Glasgow Reynolds*for appellant.

*Harold Nathan, Frederick F. Greenman*and *Chester Rohrlich*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7725** 

ERICKY ARNEZZ BOGUES , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 02724

- CCB )

Submitted : December 13 , 2012 Decided: December 19, 2012

Before MOTZ, WYNN , and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Ericky Arnezz Bogues, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee s . Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit
.PER CURIAM: Ericky Arnezz Bogues seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitution al right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is deb atable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bogues has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
180516 UCC RENEWED RULE 2004 MAG REF VERSION MAY 16, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Renewed Motion of Creditors’ Committee Seeking Entry of Order, under 

Bankruptcy Rule 2004, Authorizing Discovery Program with Respect to Certain Causes of 

Puerto Rico Financial Crisis Beginning on August 15, 2018 (Docket Entry No. 3066) and the 

Creditors’ Committee’s Urgent Unopposed Motion to File Renewed Bankruptcy Rule 2004 

Motion under Seal (Docket Entry No. 3067) filed in the above-captioned Title III proceeding are

referred to Magistrate Judge Judith Dein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 16, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last 

four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth 

of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) 

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees 

Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power 

Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3197 Filed:05/31/18 Entered:05/31/18 10:28:59 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
                      CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of KeySpan  Corporation (the "Corporation")
for the year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert B. Catell, Chairman and
Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Corporation,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                     /s/Robert B. Catell
                                     ------------------------------
                                     Name: Robert B. Catell
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                     Date: March 11, 2004