alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.6 Responsive documents. ( a ) *Answers.* Answers to applications, complaints, petitions, motions or other documents or orders instituting proceedings may be filed by any person. In hearing cases, answers may be filed by any party to such proceedings or any person who has a petition for intervention pending. Except as otherwise provided, answers are not required.
( b ) *Further responsive documents.* Except as otherwise provided, a reply to an answer, reply to a reply, or any further responsive document is not authorized.
( c ) *Motions for leave to file otherwise unauthorized documents.* ( 1 ) The Department will accept otherwise unauthorized documents for filing only if leave has been obtained from the DOT decisionmaker or, if applicable, the administrative law judge, on written motion and for good cause shown.
( 2 ) Such motions shall contain a concise statement of the matters relied upon as good cause and shall be attached to the pleading or other document for which leave to file is sought, or the written motion may be incorporated into the otherwise unauthorized document for which admission is sought. In such event, the document filed shall be titled to describe both the motion and the underlying documents.
( 3 ) Where unauthorized responsive documents are not permitted, all new matter contained in an answer filed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section shall be deemed controverted.
( d ) *Time for filing.* Except as otherwise provided, an answer, motion, or other further responsive document shall be filed within seven (7) days after service of any document, order, or ruling to which the proposed filing is responsive and must be served on all parties to the proceeding.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7351
WALTER LITTLE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 06-6003
WALTER LITTLE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-2080-HMH) Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 3, 2006- 2 - Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Little, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The district court also noted that to the extent it might consider Little’s claim under § 2255, such relief would be barred as successive. We also note that the district court erroneously stated that Little was sentenced as an armed career criminal instead of a career offender. - 3 - PER CURIAM: Walter Little, Jr., a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), challenging the validity of his sentence claiming that he was “actually innocent” of being a career offender. The district court accepted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and rejected Little’s claim that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) was inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of his detention. *Because Little does not meet the standard set forth in In re Jones , 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir. 2000), we affirm the district court’s denial of his § 2241 petition. We also affirm the district court’s denial of Little’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Form of Power of Attorney--Tekhill Information Technologies and each stockholder



 Exhibit 10.24 
 POWER OF ATTORNEY 
 In accordance with the laws and regulations
of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), I,
                                         
   , as the shareholder of [49%/51%] equity (Equity) in Shanghai Newegg E-Business Co., Ltd., hereby unconditionally and irrevocably authorize
                                         
        (Authorized Representative), to handle the transfer of the Equity on my behalf, including but not limited to the following matters: 
  

	1.	To sign the equity transfer agreement or other documents required for the transfer of the Equity in accordance with the Statement of Share Transfer attached hereto;


  

	2.	To collect the relevant forms and documents from the administrative departments (including but not limited to the approval authority and the registration authority) in
relation to the transfer of the Equity, to fill in and execute such forms and documents, to deliver to the administrative departments the certificates and documents in relation to the transfer of the Equity and to carry out procedures of transfer of
the Equity; and 

  

	3.	To handle any and all other relevant formalities and activities necessary to effect the time and lawful transfer of the Equity. 

 The above matters can be delegated to any third party, in whole or in part, by the Authorized Representative. 
 This Power of Attorney shall be effective upon the signing and shall remain effective and irrevocable for 30 years or until all the Equity is transferred to
                                         or
                                        
(whichever is earlier), notwithstanding my death or any bodily or mental incapacity.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, 

Debtor. 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17-BK-03283 (LTS) 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Ariel N. Lavinbuk hereby respectfully 

withdraws his appearance as counsel for Ad Hoc Group of General Obligation Bondholders, 

a party-in-interest in the above-captioned Title III cases, and requests removal from service 

of any further pleadings in connection with these matters. The appearances by other 

attorneys at Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP are unaffected by 

this request. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4140 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 12:58:42 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Dated: November 1, 2018 Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/ Ariel N. Lavinbuk 

Ariel N. Lavinbuk 

ROBBINS, RUSSELL, ENGLERT, ORSECK, 

UNTEREINER & SAUBER LLP 

2000 K Street, 4th Floor 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Phone: 202-775-4515 

Fax: 202-775-4510 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4140 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 12:58:42 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Wentworth Springer, Lawrence Jackson and Robert Taliaferro, Appellants.

(Argued October 7, 1936;

decided November 24, 1936.)

*Frederick J. Sullivan*and *Edward W. McDonald*for Wentworth Springer, appellant.

*James D. C. Murray, Jerome C. Lewis*and *Daniel Kirchman*for Lawrence Jackson, appellant.

*Moses A. Sachs, Le Roy Campbell*and *Homer I. Harris*for Robert Taliaferro, appellant*.*

*William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney (Felix C. Benvenga*of counsel), for respondent.

As to each defendant: judgment of conviction affirmed. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Finch, JJ. Lehman and Crouch, JJ., dissent as to defendant Taliaferro on the ground the evidence does not prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
#### CHESBROUGH LUMBER CO. *v.*CHIPPEWA CIRCUIT JUDGE.

Mandamus by the Chesbrough Lumber Company against Patrick H. O’Brien, presiding circuit judge of Chippewa county, to compel respondent to vacate an order of retaxation of costs.

Submitted January 18, 1916.

(Calendar No. 26,994.)

Writ granted July 21, 1916.

*John W. Shine,*for relator.

*Davidson & Hudson,*for respondent.

Bird, J.

Relator prays for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to vacate his order retaxing the costs in the suit of *Packard*v. *Chesbrough Lumber Co.*The questions involved herein are identical with those raised and decided in *Chesbrough Lumber Co.*v. *Circuit Judge,*190 Mich. 539 (157 N. W. 23), and is ruled by it.

The writ will be granted, with costs to the relator.

Stone, C. J., and Kuhn, Ostrander, Moore, Steere, Brooke, and Person, JJ., concurred.
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation

Ms. Evelyn Sahr Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC 1747 PennsylvaniaAvenue, N.W. Twelfth Floor Washington, D.C. 20006 Dear Ms. Sahr: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590
January 28, 2010

We have reviewed the application filed December 2,2009, as supplemented, by Aviation Matters, Inc. d/b/aPacificFlier (PacificFlier) for an exemption pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §40109 and aforeign air carrierpermit. This review has revealed the need for additional and/or clarifying information before we can complete processing PacificFlier's application. To enable us to proceed with ourreview, we ask that you provide the following information: In its application, supplemental submissions, and reply to the answer ofContinental Micronesia, PacificFlierrequests authority to engage in "non-scheduled" foreign air transportation ofpersons, property, and mail. 

### It is the Department's policy to no longer grant non-scheduled authority, therefore we request that PacificFlier clarify whether it wishes to engage in scheduled orcharter services, consistent with Departmentpolicy. (Note that the carrier's homeland license mustprovide for the type ofauthority requested.)

- Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. As it is standard Departmentpractice, we are placing a copy ofthis letter, and ask that you file your response, in Docket DOT-OST-2009- 0319. Sincerely,

# .~ George L. Wellington Chief, Foreign Air CarrierLicensing Division Office ofInternational Aviation

cc: DocketDOT-OST

-2009-0319 R. Bruce Keiner, Jr. Counsel for Continental Micronesia, Inc. Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION January 1 8 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Environment Canada FROM: Angela Cullen TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on Friday , January 1 4 , 2011 b etween Environment Canada and EPA and included the following individuals: E nvironment Canada : Stephan Couroux and Luis Phillipe EPA: By ron Bunker and Angela Cullen The discussion focused primarily on testing status of heavy duty programs at Natural Resources Canada and Transport Canada.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 23

- 00611

- CV LITTMAN STUDIO, LLC , Appellant

v. WEINRITTER ST. PAUL SQUARE, LLC , Appellee From the 408th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021

- CI

- 19896 Honorable Nicole Garza , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios Justice Beth Watkins , Justice Delivered and Filed: August 23, 2023
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
On June 22, 2023, Appellant Littman Studio, LLC filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s June 16, 2023 order . When appella nt filed the notice of appeal, it was required to pay a $205.00 filing fee. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5. However, appellant did not pay the filing fee, and we notified appellant in writing the notice of appeal had been conditionally filed because the $205.00
fil ing fee had not been paid

. We instructed appellant to pay the fee by July 6, 2023 and cautioned if the fee was not paid, the appeal was subject to being stricken by this court. The fee was not paid

.04

- 23

- 00611

- CV

- 2

- On July 18 , 2023 , we ordered appellant to either: (1) pay the filing fee; or (2) provide written proof it was entitled to appeal without paying the $205.00 filing fee . We warned appellant if it failed to respond within the time ordered, we would dismiss the appeal

. See T E X
. R. A PP . P. 5, 42.3(c). Appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to our order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 5, 42.3(c); Zayas v. Denson , No. 04

- 18

- 00373

- CV, 2018 WL 3551193, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Ju ly 25, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal for failure to pay filing fee).

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.218 Briefs to the DOT decisionmaker. ( a ) In a case in which an initial or recommended decision has been served and exceptions have been filed, any party may file a brief in support of or in opposition to any exceptions. Such briefs shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after service of the initial or recommended decision.
( b ) In a case in which no exceptions have been filed, briefs shall not be filed unless the DOT decisionmaker has taken review of the initial or recommended decision on his or her own initiative and has specifically provided for the filing of such briefs.
( c ) In all other respect, the provisions of § 302.35 shall apply.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4420 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to pay costs relating to the transportation of certain deceased 

veterans to certain State and tribal veterans’ cemeteries, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 4, 2020 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to pay costs relating to 

the transportation of certain deceased veterans to certain 

State and tribal veterans’ cemeteries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unclaimed Veterans 

5 Burial Benefit Correction Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4420 IS

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION OF DECEASED VETERANS TO 

2 CERTAIN VETERANS’ CEMETERIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2308(a) of title 38, 

4 United States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘in a na6 tional cemetery’’ and inserting ‘‘in a covered ceme7 tery’’; and 

8 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘to the 

9 national cemetery’’ and inserting ‘‘to the covered 

10 cemetery’’. 

11 (b) COVERED CEMETERY DEFINED.—Section 2308 

12 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following 

13 new subsection: 

14 ‘‘(c) COVERED CEMETERY DEFINED.—In this sec15 tion, the term ‘covered cemetery’ has the meaning given 

16 such term in section 2306(f)(2) of this title.’’. 

17 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2308 of 

18 such title is amended in the section heading by adding 

19 at the end the following: ‘‘or a veterans’ cemetery’’. 

20 (d) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

21 at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended 

22 by striking the item relating to section 2308 and inserting 

23 the following new item: 

‘‘2308. Transportation of deceased veteran to a national cemetery or a veterans’ 

cemetery.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.4

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION.
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2004 (the Report) by CGI Group, Inc. (the Company),
the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 7, 2005

| |                                                                                                  
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ André Imbeau              André Imbeau
Executive Vice-President and
  Chief Financial Officer
180601 ORD GRANTING WIDE RANGE EXT OF TIME.DOCX VERSION JUNE 1, 2018 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et 

al., 

Debtors.1

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION REQUESTING AN 

EXTENSION OF TIME (DOCKET ENTRY NO. 3231) 

 The Court has received and reviewed the Unopposed Motion for Extension of 

Time (Docket Entry No. 3231, the “Motion”) filed by counsel to Wide Range Corporation (the 

“Movant”). The Motion is hereby granted. The parties shall filed the joint status report no later 

than July 15, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). 

 This Order resolves docket entry no. 3231 in Case No. 17-3283. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 1, 2018 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

 United States District Judge 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number 

and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, 

are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation 

(“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement 

System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric 

Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to 

software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3235 Filed:06/01/18 Entered:06/01/18 17:07:25 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Motion Denied; Order filed November 6 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00203

- CR

____________ JAIME LEE GAMEZ, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12

- DCR

- 061850



### ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Michael Diaz . Appellant ’ s brief was originally due August 13 , 2014

. We granted a total of 90 days ’ extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief until November 14, 2014. When we granted the last extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional
circumstances. No brief was filed. On November 3, 2014 , counsel filed a furtherrequest for extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief. Counsel did not allege any

exceptional circumstances in the request.
We deny the request for extension and issue the following order.
Accordingly, we order Michael Diaz to file a brief with the clerk of this

c ourt on or before December 8, 2014 . If counsel does not timely file appellant’s brief as ordered, the c ourt will issue an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to d etermine the reason for the failure to file the brief and the consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel, or other appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan

.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MEO
LATE 6

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Sebastian coal bed

q
B Niche coal BEE

sition of
Ryexcoal bed —

/_\nde
fins

TN

Colvin coal bed

Magottin beds |
ot Morse

we

| Ham?) coal be

Hamiin(?) coal bed

Fire Clay coal bed

Fire Clay coal bed

Fire Clay coal bed

Fire Clay coal bed

ere

Kendrick shale
of llson

Kendrick shale
of Jillson

‘endrick shale of Jillson

—_—__

cannet City coal bed

onde) oe

LOCATION OF SECTIONS
Old wagon road in head of Pricy Creek
Improved road in Wesley Fork ot Rockhouse Creek
Old county road in head of Rock Lick Branch of
Raccoon Creek
Old county road in head of Bend Branch of Licking
River
Old wagon road in hollow opposite mouth of Improve-
ment Fork of Raccoon Creek
| ea SCALE Trail in first north hollow on Lick Creek below mouth
50 FEET r Cc of Buffalo Creek
. Outcrop in gully on south side of Lick Creek about

Silty sandstone Underclay Limestone concretions A 0.42 mile above mouth of Raccoon Creek
40 1 8. Improved road leading south and southwest from

2 Lickburg on Lick Creek
Wy 18 . U.S. Highway 460 along Licking River at the edge of
30 the quadrangle. Section extends into the White

EXPLANATION

4 ee 83°00"

Sandstone Coal Limestone 83°07" 30" 37°52'30"

QP 7 Pp YNe

<j
N

©

Siltstone Calcareous sandstone Silty underclay 3 12 Oak quadrangle
10. U.S. Highway 460 along Licking River about 0.12

19 mile below mouth of Middle Fork

11. Old wagon road in Wright Branch of Lacey Creek

10 20 12. Hillside outcrop and improved road in head of Rac-

P coon Creek

Silty shale Calcareous siltstone Concealed 5 13. Trails in head of Brushy Fork of Lick Creek

ee ww 0 . 14. Old wagon road in a south hollow of Lick Creek about

=) Marine fossils 13 0.25 mile above mouth of Brushy Fork

Transition beds

7 15. Hillside outcrop in Elk Creek about 1 mile northeast
th 6 20 r of Elk Creek School
16. U.S. Highway 460 along west edge of Salyersville.
21 Section extends into the Salyersville South quad-
= rangle
8 17. Hillside outcrop and domestic coal opening in a small
hollow on Big Mine Fork opposite mouth of Lacey
Black shale Calcareous shale Poorly exposed strata 14 Creek
15. & 18. Hillside outcrop and unimproved road along Big Mine
22 Fork about 0.1 to 0.3 mile below mouth of Flat Fork
(ol 19. Outcrop in Big Mine Fork about 0.2 mile below Wheel-
ersburg and old wagon road up hill east from
Wheelersburg
10 20. Improved road in Big Mine Fork from Wheelersburg
5 , south to gap at head of creek
A Bie 37°45! 21. Trail up hill about 0.3 mile north-northwest of Falcon
on State Road Fork

22. Unimproved road in third hollow on north side of
INDEX MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF SECTIONS Burton Fork of Mash Fork

Shale Calcareous siltstone concretions

Flint clay

1 0 1 2 MILES
foo fl_f_____}]

HE LEE AND BREATHITT FORMATIONS IN THE SALYERSVILLE NORTH QUADRANGLE, KENTUCKY

STRATIGRAPHIG SECTIONS OF

656172 O - 63