alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 29.1019 Oil strainer or filter. ( a ) Each turbine engine installation must incorporate an oil strainer or filter through which all of the engine oil flows and which meets the following requirements: ( 1 ) Each oil strainer or filter that has a bypass must be constructed and installed so that oil will flow at the normal rate through the rest of the system with the strainer or filter completely blocked.
( 2 ) The oil strainer or filter must have the capacity (with respect to operating limitations established for the engine) to ensure that engine oil system functioning is not impaired when the oil is contaminated to a degree (with respect to particle size and density) that is greater than that established for the engine under Part 33 of this chapter.
( 3 ) The oil strainer or filter, unless it is installed at an oil tank outlet, must incorporate a means to indicate contamination before it reaches the capacity established in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 4 ) The bypass of a strainer or filter must be constructed and installed so that the release of collected contaminants is minimized by appropriate location of the bypass to ensure that collected contaminants are not in the bypass flow path.
( 5 ) An oil strainer or filter that has no bypass, except one that is installed at an oil tank outlet, must have a means to connect it to the warning system required in § 29.1305(a)(19).
( b ) Each oil strainer or filter in a powerplant installation using reciprocating engines must be constructed and installed so that oil will flow at the normal rate through the rest of the system with the strainer or filter element completely blocked.
[Amdt. 29-10, 39 FR 35463, Oct. 1, 1974, as amended by Amdt. 29-22, 49 FR 6850, Feb. 23, 1984; Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34218, Sept. 2, 1988; Amdt. 29-59, 88 FR 8739, Feb. 10, 2023]
§ 323.10 Time for filing objections. ( a ) Objections shall be filed not later than: ( 1 ) 12 days from the date of filing of a 30-day notice;
( 2 ) 15 days from the date of filing of a 60-day notice; or
( 3 ) 20 days from the date of filing of a 90-day notice.
( b ) The Department may accept late-filed objections, upon motion, for good cause shown.
( c ) Whenever a notice has been filed earlier than required under § 323.5, the Department may extend the time for filing an objection to that notice.
#### Laverty and others *vs.*Murray.

Where a *replication*is put in, taking issue upon the matter alleged by way of defence in » special plea, so that the same may be fairly tried, and the plaintiff notice the cause for trial, he may proceed and take an inquest, notwithstanding that *mbsequently*and within twenty days after the replication, he is served with a general demurrer to the replication. The inquest taken under such circumstances will not be set aside as irregularly obtained.

*345[657] Motion to set aside inquest. The suit was commenced in *December*last, by the service of a declaration containing a count on a promissory note and the common money counts. On the 26th December, the defendant pleaded specially, that before the commencement of the suit, to wit, on, &c., the plaintiffs *for a valuable consideration agreed to give time of payment*until *the first day*of January, 1837. The plaintiffs’ attorney, believing the plea to *ha false,*and knowing that he might apply to have it struck out upon that ground, instead of taking that course, put in a *replication*denying *that the plaintiffs for a valuable consideration agreed to give time, Syc.,*concluding to the country, and adding a *similiter,*which on the 31st December was served on the defendant’s attorney, together with *a notice of trial*for the Essex circuit, to be held on the *third Wednesday of January.*On the 16th January the defendant served a *general demurrer.*The plaintiffs’ attorney disregarded the demurrer, took an inquest and entered judgment on the same, on the 28th day of January, and issued an execution. On these facts the defendant moved to set aside the inquest and all subsequent proceedings. The plaintiffs made an affidavit that the plea was false.'

*By the Court,*

Bronson, J.

I am satisfied that the demurrer was not put in in *good faith ;*the question of fact raised by the pleadings might have been fairly tried. The plaintiffs’ attorney was right in the course he adopted. (14 *Johns. R.*345. 1 *Cowen,*152, 154.) The motion is denied for the reason above suggested; and not on the ground of the *falsity*of the plea. Motion denied.
Assignment of Consulting Agreement



 
Exhibit
10(zz) 
 
ASSIGNMENT 
 
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Maker of this instrument, TLM
HOLDINGS CORP. (hereinafter referred to as the “Assignor”), has assigned, transferred, and delivered, and by these presents does assign, transfer, and deliver, unto ACCESS WORLDWIDE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (hereinafter referred to as the
“Assignee”), all of the Assignor’s right, title, and interest in the Consulting Agreement dated June 24, 1999, as amended from time to time (the “Agreement”), and the Assignee hereby accepts said assignment and agrees to be
bound by and perform all of Assignor’s rights and obligations under and pursuant to the Agreement. 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto caused their hands and seals to be affixed as of this 1st day of January, 2003. 
 

	 TLM HOLDINGS CORP. 

	
	 By:
	 	  


	 	 	 


 

	 ACCESS WORLDWIDE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.

	
	 By:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Saunders, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 501]

—Applica*321tion by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 16, 1992 *(People v Saunders,*187 AD2d 619), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered October 4, 1990.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
§ 406.159 Subpoenas. ( a ) *Request for subpoena.* A party may obtain from the administrative law judge a subpoena to compel the attendance of a witness at a deposition or hearing or to require the production of documents or tangible items. The administrative law judge must deliver the subpoena, signed by the administrative law judge but otherwise in blank, to the party. The party must complete the subpoena, stating the title of the action and the date and time for the witness' attendance or production of documents or items. The party who obtained the subpoena must serve the subpoena on the witness.
( b ) *Motion to quash or modify the subpoena.* A party, or any person upon whom a subpoena has been served, may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena at or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance. The applicant must describe, in detail, the basis for the motion to quash or modify the subpoena including, but not limited to, a statement that the testimony, document, or tangible evidence is not relevant to the proceeding, that the subpoena is not reasonably tailored to the scope of the proceeding, or that the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive. A motion to quash or modify the subpoena will stay the effect of the subpoena pending a decision by the administrative law judge on the motion.
( c ) *Enforcement of subpoena.* Upon a showing that a person has failed or refused to comply with a subpoena, the Secretary may apply to the appropriate district court of the United States to seek enforcement of the subpoena in accordance with 51 U.S.C. 50917(c). A party may request the Secretary to seek such enforcement.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-8607, 66 FR 2180, Jan. 10, 2001, as amended by Amdt. 406-7, 77 FR 20533, Apr. 5, 2012]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Zaxis International Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ivo Heiden, CEO and CFOof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ivo Heiden

Ivo HeidenCEO and CFODated: November 13, 2009

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zaxis International Inc. and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
exv10w21









Exhibit 10.21




APPENDIX B

to

PROSPECTUS DATED October 28, 2008




CHS Inc.

Deferred Compensation Plan




This Appendix B is dated _October 28, 2008.








This document constitutes part of a prospectus covering securities that

have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933.







RATES OF RETURN FOR THE INVESTMENT FUNDS



The information below supplements the information contained in the CHS Inc. Deferred Compensation
Plan prospectus, under the heading “How Are Earnings On My Account Determined.” Shown below are
the rates of return for each of the last three years for each of the investment alternatives
available under the Plan. The funds below are used solely as an index for determining gains or
losses on your unfunded account. You do not actually own any shares of the fund used as the index.



Annual investment returns for the 12 months ending:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Fund Name/Ticker	 	2007	 	2006	 	2005
	Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund	 	 	5.14	%	 	 	4.88	%	 	 	3.01	%
	Vanguard LifeStrategy Income Fund	 	 	6.70	%	 	 	7.93	%	 	 	3.23	%
	Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund	 	 	6.99	%	 	 	10.62	%	 	 	4.45	%
	Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth Fund	 	 	7.36	%	 	 	13.31	%	 	 	5.69	%
	Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund	 	 	7.46	%	 	 	16.13	%	 	 	6.88	%
	Fixed Income Fund
	 	 	2009:  6.70	%	 	 	N/A	 	 	 	N/A	 	 	 	N/A	 
	Ten-Year T-Note Fund*
	 	 	2008:  5.83	%	 	 	5.70	%	 	 	5.39	%	 	 	5.22	%








 




			
	*	 	Effective January 1, 2009 the Ten-Year T-Note Fund is replaced with the Fixed Income
Fund.




The above amounts are not necessarily indicative of the results realized by individual Plan
participants, due to the timing of deferrals, investment reallocations and withdrawals, and daily
changes in the market value of securities. Furthermore, the above amounts should not be regarded
as indicative of future performance of the investment funds.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7351

WALTER LITTLE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 06-6003

WALTER LITTLE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-05-2080-HMH)

Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 3, 2006
- 2 -

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Little, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

The district court also noted that to the extent it might

consider Little’s claim under § 2255, such relief would be barred

as successive. We also note that the district court erroneously

stated that Little was sentenced as an armed career criminal

instead of a career offender. 

- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Walter Little, Jr., a federal prisoner, filed a petition

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), challenging the validity of his

sentence claiming that he was “actually innocent” of being a career

offender. The district court accepted the magistrate judge’s

recommendation and rejected Little’s claim that 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) was inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of his

detention.*

 Because Little does not meet the standard set forth in

In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir. 2000), we affirm the

district court’s denial of his § 2241 petition. We also affirm the

district court’s denial of Little’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 29.1021 Oil system drains. A drain (or drains) must be provided to allow safe drainage of the oil system. Each drain must— ( a ) Be accessible; and
( b ) Have manual or automatic means for positive locking in the closed position.
[Amdt. 29-22, 49 FR 6850, Feb. 23, 1984]
§ 29.1093 Induction system icing protection. ( a ) *Reciprocating engines.* Each reciprocating engine air induction system must have means to prevent and eliminate icing. Unless this is done by other means, it must be shown that, in air free of visible moisture at a temperature of 30 °F., and with the engines at 60 percent of maximum continuous power— ( 1 ) Each rotorcraft with sea level engines using conventional venturi carburetors has a preheater that can provide a heat rise of 90 °F.;
( 2 ) Each rotorcraft with sea level engines using carburetors tending to prevent icing has a preheater that can provide a heat rise of 70 °F.;
( 3 ) Each rotorcraft with altitude engines using conventional venturi carburetors has a preheater that can provide a heat rise of 120 °F.; and
( 4 ) Each rotorcraft with altitude engines using carburetors tending to prevent icing has a preheater that can provide a heat rise of 100 °F.
( b ) *Turbine engines.* ( 1 ) It must be shown that each turbine engine and its air inlet system can operate throughout the flight power range of the engine (including idling)— ( i ) Without accumulating ice on engine or inlet system components that would adversely affect engine operation or cause a serious loss of power under the icing conditions specified in appendix C of this Part; and
( ii ) In snow, both falling and blowing, without adverse effect on engine operation, within the limitations established for the rotorcraft.
( 2 ) Each turbine engine must idle for 30 minutes on the ground, with the air bleed available for engine icing protection at its critical condition, without adverse effect, in an atmosphere that is at a temperature between 15° and 30 °F (between −9° and −1 °C) and has a liquid water content not less than 0.3 grams per cubic meter in the form of drops having a mean effective diameter not less than 20 microns, followed by momentary operation at takeoff power or thrust. During the 30 minutes of idle operation, the engine may be run up periodically to a moderate power or thrust setting in a manner acceptable to the Administrator.
( c ) *Supercharged reciprocating engines.* For each engine having a supercharger to pressurize the air before it enters the carburetor, the heat rise in the air caused by that supercharging at any altitude may be utilized in determining compliance with paragraph (a) of this section if the heat rise utilized is that which will be available, automatically, for the applicable altitude and operation condition because of supercharging.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, 72 Stat. 752, 775, 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423; sec. 6(c), 49 U.S.C. 1655 (c))
[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 969, Jan. 26, 1968, as amended by Amdt. 29-12, 41 FR 55473, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 29-13, 42 FR 15046, Mar. 17, 1977; Amdt. 29-22, 49 FR 6850, Feb. 23, 1984; Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34219, Sept. 2, 1988]
#### Frank L. Finlaw, Respondent, *v.*Maurice Wertheim et al., Co-partners under the Firm Name of Wertheim & Co., et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.

(Argued September 30, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*551*Lionel S. Popkin*for appellants.

*S. Harry Eilenberg*and *Harold F. Levin*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. *Johnston*v. *Trask*(116 N. Y. 136) has not been overruled or modified by *DeWaal*v. *Jamison*(226 N. Y. 644). (See, also, *Hyman-Michaels Co.*v. *Senior & Palmer, Inc.,*265 N. Y. 266.) No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
§ 29.855 Cargo and baggage compartments. ( a ) Each cargo and baggage compartment must be construced of or lined with materials in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) For accessible and inaccessible compartments not occupied by passengers or crew, the material must be at least fire resistant.
( 2 ) Materials must meet the requirements in § 29.853(a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) for cargo or baggage compartments in which— ( i ) The presence of a compartment fire would be easily discovered by a crewmember while at the crewmember's station;
( ii ) Each part of the compartment is easily accessible in flight;
( iii ) The compartment has a volume of 200 cubic feet or less; and
( iv ) Notwithstanding § 29.1439(a), protective breathing equipment is not required.
( b ) No compartment may contain any controls, wiring, lines, equipment, or accessories whose damage or failure would affect safe operation, unless those items are protected so that— ( 1 ) They cannot be damaged by the movement of cargo in the compartment; and
( 2 ) Their breakage or failure will not create a fire hazard.
( c ) The design and sealing of inaccessible compartments must be adequate to contain compartment fires until a landing and safe evacuation can be made.
( d ) Each cargo and baggage compartment that is not sealed so as to contain cargo compartment fires completely without endangering the safety of a rotorcraft or its occupants must be designed, or must have a device, to ensure detection of fires or smoke by a crewmember while at his station and to prevent the accumulation of harmful quantities of smoke, flame, extinguishing agents, and other noxious gases in any crew or passenger compartment. This must be shown in flight.
( e ) For rotorcraft used for the carriage of cargo only, the cabin area may be considered a cargo compartment and, in addition to paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, the following apply: ( 1 ) There must be means to shut off the ventilating airflow to or within the compartment. Controls for this purpose must be accessible to the flight crew in the crew compartment.
( 2 ) Required crew emergency exits must be accessible under all cargo loading conditions.
( 3 ) Sources of heat within each compartment must be shielded and insulated to prevent igniting the cargo.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 969, Jan. 26, 1968; Amdt. 29-24, 49 FR 44438, Nov. 6, 1984; Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 8004, Mar. 6, 1990]
Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
333-119491,  333-104230,  333-82230,  333-92003  and  333-13429  on Form S-3 and
Registration  Statement Nos. 333-119474,  333-53765,  333-40472 and 333-79151 on
Form S-8 of our reports  dated  February  28,  2006,  relating to the  financial
statements  and  financial  statement  schedules of KeySpan  Corporation  [which
report  expresses an unqualified  opinion and includes an explanatory  paragraph
related to (i) the adoption of FASB Interpretation  ("FIN") 46 "Consolidation of
Variable Interest  Entities,  an Interpretation of ARB No. 51" discussed in Note
1(P)  and (ii)  the  adoption  of FIN 47, "  Accounting  for  Conditional  Asset
Retirement  Obligations,  an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143" discussed
in Notes 1(O), 1(P) and 7] and to management's  report on the  effectiveness  of
internal  control over  financial  reporting  appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of KeySpan Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005.


/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
February 28, 2006
New York, New York
§ 29.610 Lightning and static electricity protection. ( a ) The rotorcraft structure must be protected against catastrophic effects from lightning.
( b ) For metallic components, compliance with paragraph (a) of this section may be shown by— ( 1 ) Electrically bonding the components properly to the airframe; or
( 2 ) Designing the components so that a strike will not endanger the rotorcraft.
( c ) For nonmetallic components, compliance with paragraph (a) of this section may be shown by— ( 1 ) Designing the components to minimize the effect of a strike; or
( 2 ) Incorporating acceptable means of diverting the resulting electrical current to not endanger the rotorcraft.
( d ) The electric bonding and protection against lightning and static electricity must— ( 1 ) Minimize the accumulation of electrostatic charge;
( 2 ) Minimize the risk of electric shock to crew, passengers, and service and maintenance personnel using normal precautions;
( 3 ) Provide and electrical return path, under both normal and fault conditions, on rotorcraft having grounded electrical systems; and
( 4 ) Reduce to an acceptable level the effects of static electricity on the functioning of essential electrical and electronic equipment.
[Amdt. 29-24, 49 FR 44437, Nov. 6, 1984; Amdt. 29-40, 61 FR 21907, May 10, 1996; 61 FR 33963, July 1, 1996; Amdt. 29-53, 76 FR 33135, June 8, 2011]
Exhibit 99.3
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
  
    
    our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated December 6,
2010 on the consolidated balance sheets of Gildan Activewear Inc. (the Company) as at
October 3, 2010 and October 4, 2009 and the consolidated statements of earnings and
comprehensive income, shareholders equity and cash flows for the years ended October 3, 2010,
October 4, 2009, and October 5, 2008
 
    
    our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated December 6,
2010 on the Reconciliation to United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
 
    
    our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated December 6,
2010 on the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of October 3, 2010
#### § 298.1 Applicability of part.

This part establishes classifications of air carriers known as “air taxi operators” and “commuter air carriers,” provides certain exemptions to them from some of the economic regulatory provisions of Subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United States Code (Transportation), specifies procedures by which such air carriers may obtain authority to conduct operations, and establishes rules applicable to their operations in interstate and/or foreign air transportation in all States, Territories and possessions of the United States. This part also establishes reporting requirements for commuter air carriers and small certificated air carriers.
129 STAT. 2224 PUBLIC LAW 114–108—DEC. 18, 2015 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 76: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015): 

Dec. 15, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 17, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–108 

114th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Appointing the day for the convening of the second session of the One Hundred 

Fourteenth Congress. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the second 

regular session of the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress shall 

begin at noon on Monday, January 4, 2016. 

Approved December 18, 2015. 

Dec. 18, 2015 

[H.J. Res. 76] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS