alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR  THE  NINE  MONTHS  ENDED
SEPTEMBER  30, 2000 AND 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         114,508
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,209,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,693,491
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,590,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,666,093
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,957
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,119,651)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,590,687
<SALES>                                      2,169,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,812,638
<CGS>                                        1,145,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,251,925
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,453,855)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3031 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3031

 To provide a 10 percent increase in the rate of basic pay for members 
of the uniformed services, effective January 1, 2004, to pay a one-time 
 bonus to members of the Armed Forces who served or serve in a combat 
   zone designated for Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring 
                    Freedom, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2003

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
  Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide a 10 percent increase in the rate of basic pay for members 
of the uniformed services, effective January 1, 2004, to pay a one-time 
 bonus to members of the Armed Forces who served or serve in a combat 
   zone designated for Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring 
                    Freedom, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN BASIC PAY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004.

    (a) Waiver of Section 1009 Adjustment.--The adjustment to become 
effective during fiscal year 2004 required by section 1009 of title 37, 
United States Code, in the rates of monthly basic pay authorized 
members of the uniformed services shall not be made.
    (b) Increase in Basic Pay.--Effective on January 1, 2004, the rates 
of monthly basic pay for members of the uniformed services are 
increased by 10 percent.

SEC. 2. ONE-TIME BONUS FOR SERVICE IN COMBAT ZONE DESIGNATED FOR 
              OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM OR OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM.

    (a) Military Services.--The Secretary of Defense shall pay a one-
time bonus of $1,500 to each member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or 
Marine Corps, including reserve components thereof, who served or 
serves for any period of time in a combat zone designated in connection 
with Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom.
    (b) Coast Guard.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall pay a 
one-time bonus of $1,500 to each member of the Coast Guard or Coast 
Guard Reserve who served or serves for any period of time in a combat 
zone designated in connection with Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation 
Enduring Freedom.
                                 <all>
```
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4409 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ‘‘Lawrence M. 

‘Larry’ Walsh Sr. Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 4, 2020 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ‘‘Lawrence M. ‘Larry’ Walsh Sr. Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAWRENCE M. ‘‘LARRY’’ WALSH SR. POST OF4 FICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in 

7 Elwood, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Lawrence M. ‘Larry’ Walsh Sr. Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4409 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lawrence M. ‘Larry’ 

5 Walsh Sr. Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 380
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 380.30 Solicitation materials. ( a ) All solicitation materials for a Public Charter shall include the name of the charter operator and the name of the direct air carrier.
( b ) Any solicitation material that states a price per passenger shall also include one of the following: ( 1 ) A statement referring to the operator-participant contract for further information about conditions applicable to the charter; or
( 2 ) The full text of the operator-participant contract.
( c ) Except as set forth in § 380.33a for operator's option plan contracts, if the charter prospectus names alternative dates or cities, any solicitation material that states a price per passenger shall also state that the actual dates or cities have not yet been selected, if that is the case.
( d ) Any solicitation material that names a hotel but does not name every hotel named in the operator-participant contract shall also state that substitutions may be made.
( e ) In any solicitation material from a direct air carrier, indirect air carrier, or an agent of either, for a charter, charter tour (*i.e.,* a combination of air transportation and ground accommodations), or a charter tour component (e.g., a hotel stay), any price stated for such charter, tour, or component shall be the entire price to be paid by the participants to the air carrier, or agent, for such charter, tour, or component.
Order filed November 23, 2021 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00458-CV

____________

BOBBY B. DASH, Appellant

V.

KALPESH PRAVINBHAI PATEL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-38955

ORDER

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s application for a 

temporary injunction. The clerk’s record does not contain a copy of the signed order 

denying injunctive relief, and the trial court’s docket does not indicate such an order 

has been issued. Accordingly, the Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record within 7 days of the date of this order, containing a copy 

of the signed order denying the requested temporary injunction. If the case file does 

not contain the signed order, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental 
2

clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the case file does not contain the 

signed order. If this court does not receive a copy of the signed order, this appeal 

will be subject to dismissal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
#### In the Matter of Lawrence A. Burke, Appellant, against Philip N. Krug et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Nassau County et al., Respondents.

(Argued October 15, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*576
      *David B. Tolins*and *Saul Gordon*for appellant.

*James L. Dowsey, County Attorney (Kenneth M. Spence*and *Clarence E. Galston*of counsel), for Philip N. Krug et al., constituting the Board of Elections of Nassau county, respondents.

*Howard G. Wilson, H. Stewart McKnight*and *Henry J. A. Collins*for Nassau County Commission on Governmental Revision, respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Herbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
ex10-1.htm


    AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    DATED
NOVEMBER 5, 2009

    


    This
Amendment to Employment Agreement (“EA”) is further amending the Employment
Agreement that was entered into and signed on February 18, 2003 by and between
Century Casinos, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Dr. Erwin Haitzmann
(“Employee”), an Austrian citizen, as follows:

    


    
      	
              A)  

            	
              In
      Section 1. Term
      of Agreement, the date “December 31, 2009” shall be replaced with
      “December 31,
      2014”

            


    

    


    
      	
              B)  

            	
              In
      Section 10. Notice, the
      address of the Employer shall read as
follows:

            


    

    


    
      	
              “Employer:

            	
               Century Casinos Europe
      GmbH

            


    

    
      Untere Viaduktgasse 2, 3.
Stock

      A-1030
Wien, Austria/Europe

    

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer and Employee have duly executed this Amendment as of
the day and year first above written.

    


     

    EMPLOYER
– CENTURY CASINOS EUROPE GMBH:

    


    By: /s/ Andreas
Terler                                                                           

    DI
Andreas Terler, Geschaeftsfuhrer

    


    EMPLOYEE:

    


    By: /s/ Erwin
Haitzmann                                                                

    Dr. Erwin
Haitzmann

    


    


    FOR
CENTURY CASINOS, INC. AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:

    


    By: /s/ Gottfried
Schellmann                                                                           

    Mag.
Gottfried Schellmann,

    Director
and Member of Compensation Committee

    


    By: /s/ Dinah
Corbaci                                                                

    Dr. Dinah
Corbaci,

    Director
and Member of Compensation Committee
§ 29.1363 Electrical system tests. ( a ) When laboratory tests of the electrical system are conducted— ( 1 ) The tests must be performed on a mock-up using the same generating equipment used in the rotorcraft;
( 2 ) The equipment must simulate the electrical characteristics of the distribution wiring and connected loads to the extent necessary for valid test results; and
( 3 ) Laboratory generator drives must simulate the prime movers on the rotorcraft with respect to their reaction to generator loading, including loading due to faults.
( b ) For each flight condition that cannot be simulated adequately in the laboratory or by ground tests on the rotorcraft, flight tests must be made.
§ 35.34 Inspections, adjustments and repairs. ( a ) Before and after conducting the tests prescribed in this part, the test article must be subjected to an inspection, and a record must be made of all the relevant parameters, calibrations and settings.
( b ) During all tests, only servicing and minor repairs are permitted. If major repairs or part replacement is required, the Administrator must approve the repair or part replacement prior to implementation and may require additional testing. Any unscheduled repair or action on the test article must be recorded and reported.
[Amdt. 35-8, 73 FR 63348, Oct. 24, 2008]
#### Margaret J. Clark, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frank J. Clark, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*The Delaware and Hudson Railroad Corporation, Respondent.

(Argued May 22, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*414
      *James A. Leary*and *Walter A. Fullerton*for appellant.

*Joseph Rosch, Wallace E. Pierce*and *Raymond L. Carr*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Crouch, Lough-ran and Finch, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J.
#### Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Respondent, *v.*Conrad Hellinger, Appellant.

(Argued June 3, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*25
      *Emanuel H. Reichart*for appellant.

*26
      *Julius C. Krause*and *Henry Sillcocks*for respondent.

*James A. Gifford, Charles L. Woody, Herbert P. Carter*and *C. Lansing Hays, amici curise.*

*Per Curiam.*

We do not reach the question of what defendant’s obligations, if any, would have been had there been a mere technical surrender of the master lease and nothing more. The terms of the agreement of September 13, 1930, clearly and as matter of law disclose an intent that the subleases were to be kept alive and that the owner should stand in the shoes of the defendant’s immediate lessor. In effect there was an assignment of the subleases. Any narrower interpretation would be inequitable. Under such circumstances the doctrine of merger is inapplicable. *(Beal*v. *Boston Car Spring Co.,*
      *27125 Mass. 157; *Appleton*v. *Ames,*150 Mass. 34; cf. 13 Columbia Law Rev. 245.)

The order should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the negative.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Grouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk September 3 , 2019

158751(112)

COUNCIL OF ORGA NIZATIONS AND

OTHERS FOR EDUCATION ABOUT

PAROCHIAID, AMERICAN CIVIL

LIBERTIES UNION OF MICHIGAN,

MICHIGAN PARENTS FOR SCHOOLS,

482FORWARD, MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION

OF SCHOOL BOARDS, MICHIGAN

ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL

ADMINISTRATORS, MICHIGAN

ASSOCIATION OF INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

ADMINISTRATORS, MICHIGAN SCHOOL

BUSINESS OFFICIALS, MICHIGAN

ASSOCIATION OF SECONDARY SCHOOL

PRINCIPALS, MIDDLE CITIES EDUCATION

ASSOCIATION, MICHIGAN ELEMENTARY

AND MIDDLE SCHOOL PRINCIPALS

ASSOCIATION, KALAMAZOO PUBLIC

SCHOOLS and K ALAMAZOO PUBLIC

SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

SC: 158751

v COA: 343801

Ct of Claims: 17

- 000068

- MB

STATE OF MICHIGAN, GOVERNOR,

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, and

SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC

INSTRUCTION,

Defendants

- Appellees

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendants

- appellees to extend the time

for filing t he i r brief is GRANTED. The brief will be accepted as timely filed if submitted

on or before October 2 1, 2019.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7104

MARSHALL LEE BROWN, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
ERIC HOOKS , Respondent

- Appellee , and
KEN BEAVER , Respondent

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. ( 5:18

- cv - 00092

- MR )

Submitted : April 29, 2021 Decided: May 11, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marshall Lee Brown, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on
his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition and denying his motion to reconsider . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing
Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U .S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Brown’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7621** 

ERVIN SHERROD POLLARD , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. BUTCH JACKSON , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Distri ct of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:08

- hc

- 02121

- BO )

Submitted : June 15, 2010 Decided: September 8 , 2010

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Ervin Sherrod Pollard, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ervin Sherrod Pollard seeks to appeal the dist rict
court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not is sue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that th e district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prison er must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that P ollard has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court an d argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSE D
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25168-25169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10129]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-07]

Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC); ASC Rules of Operation; Amended

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of amendment to the ASC Rules of Operation by vote of 
the ASC at its April 11, 2012 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 25169]]

SUMMARY: The ASC of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination 
Council (FFIEC) amended the following sections of the ASC Rules of 
Operation:
    1. Section 3.04.a to provide for selection of a Vice Chairperson by 
ASC members with the Vice Chairperson's term of office running 
concurrently with the Chairperson's term;
    2. Section 1.02(8) to define ``Vice Chairperson'' consistent with 
section 3.04.a; and
    3. As a technical correction, Section 1.02(3) to remove the 
reference to the Office of Thrift Supervision (which became part of the 
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency July 21, 2011).
    4. The definition of ``member agency'' footnotes the amendment to 
section 1011 of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council 
Act by the Dodd-Frank Act to include designees of the heads of the 
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and the Federal Housing Finance 
Agency.
    The ASC Rules of Operation serve as corporate bylaws outlining the 
ASC's purpose, functions, authority, organization and operation.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ASC was established by Section 1102 (12 
U.S.C. 3310) of Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, 
Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (Title XI). The Dodd-Frank Wall 
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 amended numerous 
provisions in Title XI. The ASC Rules of Operation serve as corporate 
bylaws outlining the ASC's purpose, functions, authority, organization 
and operation.

DATES: Effective Date: Immediately.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James R. Park, Executive Director, at 
(202) 595-7575, or Alice M. Ritter, General Counsel, at (202) 595-7577, 
via Internet email at jim@asc.gov and alice@asc.gov, respectively, or 
by U.S. Mail at Appraisal Subcommittee, 1401 H Street NW., Suite 760, 
Washington, DC 20005.
* * * * *

    By the Appraisal Subcommittee.

    Dated: April 23, 2012.
Peter Gillispie,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2012-10129 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v. “*John Doe ” et al., Defendants; Leo P. Byk, Appellant.

(Argued June 3, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*474
      *Norman Laidhold,*and *William Weisman*for appellant.

*Hiram C. Todd, Special Assistant Attorney-General (Franklin S. Pollak, Special Assistant Attorney-General,*and *Edward C. Jaegerman*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.