alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WILSON v BYRD

Case No. 91-129 AP

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County

November 1, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Cecily Robinson-Duffie, Esquire, for appellant.

Waymon Byrd, pro se.

Before GOLDMAN, DONNER, MUIR, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MUIR, J.

This is a landlord-tenant case in which the trial court found an *215illegal “lock-out” eviction had occurred but denied damages to the tenant because the rent ($300 per month) was at least three months in arrears at the time of the illegal eviction.

The tenant appealed the judgment seeking three times the rent ($900) as the minimum statutory damages for the illegal eviction and attorneys’ fees in excess of the $500 awarded by the court below.

The main issue for decision is whether the trial court erred in denying the tenant damages by setting off against statutory damages the rents overdue to the landlord.

The landlord failed to file a claim or an answer requesting a set-off for his losses. The landlord raised the matter of the back rents due at a trial on the *tenant’s*claim for damages.

Section 83.67(4), Fla. Stat., provides that an illegally evicted tenant shall be awarded three times the rent or actual damages, whichever is greater. The minimum damages provided are mandatory and the trial court has no discretion to set off the landlord’s losses against the tenant’s award.

As to attorneys’ fees, the trial court set the award without making the findings required by *Florida Patient’s Comp. Fund v Rowe, 472*So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985).

Accordingly, the final judgment is REVERSED and this cause REMANDED with instructions to enter judgment in the sum of $900 in favor of the tenant and to reconsider the award of attorneys’ fees according to the requirements of *Rowe.*REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GOLDMAN, and DONNER, JJ., concur.
Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:3836   Filed:08/30/18   Entered:08/30/18 18:31:47    Desc: MainDocument     Page 1 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:3836   Filed:08/30/18   Entered:08/30/18 18:31:47    Desc: MainDocument     Page 2 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:3836   Filed:08/30/18   Entered:08/30/18 18:31:47    Desc: MainDocument     Page 3 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:3836   Filed:08/30/18   Entered:08/30/18 18:31:47    Desc: MainDocument     Page 4 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:3836   Filed:08/30/18   Entered:08/30/18 18:31:47    Desc: MainDocument     Page 5 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:3836   Filed:08/30/18   Entered:08/30/18 18:31:47    Desc: MainDocument     Page 6 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:3836   Filed:08/30/18   Entered:08/30/18 18:31:47    Desc: MainDocument     Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 0
<SECURITIES>                                       3,637
<RECEIVABLES>                                     38,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                       6,278
<INVENTORY>                                       26,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 150,954
<PP&E>                                            36,744
<DEPRECIATION>                                    25,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   403,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             95,389
<BONDS>                                           84,659
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             246
<OTHER-SE>                                       150,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     403,091
<SALES>                                          150,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 150,285
<CGS>                                            135,949
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    162,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 4,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (16,995)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (4,877)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (12,118)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (12,118)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.50)


</TABLE>
#### TAYLOR v. TOWN OF GUNTERSVILLE.

(Decided May 18, 1916.)

Appeal from Marshall Circuit. Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Haralson.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANNA SCHMIDT,

Appellant,

v.

STEPHEN SCHMIDT,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1498

[June 23, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Scott Suskauer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-DR001222-XXXX-NB.

Ralph T. White of The Law Office of RT White, Palm Beach Gardens, 

for appellant.

Jean M. Henne of Jean M. Henne, P.A., Winter Haven, for appellee.

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Anna Schmidt (“Former Wife”) appeals the trial court’s orders denying 

her Urgent Motion to Suspend Timesharing and granting Stephen 

Schmidt’s (“Former Husband”) Motion for Contempt and Enforcement of 

Final Judgment and Parenting Plan. On appeal, Former Wife argues the 

trial court erred in (1) denying her motion to suspend Former Husband’s 

timesharing; (2) finding her in contempt of the parenting plan; (3) denying 

her request for attorney’s fees and costs; and (4) finding Former Husband 

was entitled to attorney’s fees and costs. We affirm on the first three issues 

without further comment. For the reasons discussed below, we dismiss 

the issue regarding Former Husband’s entitlement to attorney’s fees as not 

yet ripe. 

Although the trial court found that Former Husband was entitled to 

attorney’s fees in connection with the motion for contempt, it did not award 

an amount. An order merely finding entitlement to attorney’s fees is a 

non-final, non-appealable order. See, e.g., Revier v. Revier, 45 So. 3d 570, 

571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“We dismiss [the] aspect of the final judgment as 

it relates to the award of attorney’s fees since the trial court determined 
2

only entitlement and reserved the determination of amount for a future 

day.”); Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So. 2d 130, 131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) 

(“[O]rders granting attorney’s fees without determining amount are not 

ripe for appellate review.”); Wolf v. Wolf, 296 So. 3d 479, 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2020) (“An order that determines entitlement to attorney’s fees without a 

determination of the amount is a nonappealable, nonfinal order.”). 

Accordingly, we dismiss without prejudice the aspect of the order awarding 

attorney’s fees. See Anglia Jacs & Co. v. Dubin, 783 So. 2d 1155, 1155 

(Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[CERTIFIED	TRANSLATION] I,	Carlos	Laó	Dávila,	a	Federally	certified	interpreter,	number	03-052,

hereby	certify	that	the	attached	document	is	a	true	and	exact	translation	of	the	original certified	or	translated	by	me

SENATE Federal, Political, and Economic Relations Commission

HOPE AND PROGRESS Hon. Thomas Rivera Schatz, President

May 9, 2018

Mr. José B. Carrión III

President

Financial Oversight 

& Administration Board

For Puerto Rico

268 Muñoz Rivera Ave.

World Plaza, Suite 1107

San Juan, PR 00918

Dear Mister Carrión:

This past April 26, 2018, upon request of the Financial Oversight and Administration Board for Puerto 

Rico, we filed in the Senate of Puerto Rico, Senate Bill 919, “Labor Reform Act of 2018.”

Just as every legislative bill, it will follow the ordinary legislative process. It will be analyzed with 

responsibility and evaluating the recommendations of those persons with knowledge in the matter and who 

have studied the economic system of Puerto Rico for years. 

The Financial Oversight Board, has filed this proposal in a vacuum. We summon you to appear before the 

Federal, Social, and Economic Relations Commission of the Senate with the goal of you stating to us and 

evidence the need to pass the Labor Reform. Due to your refusal to appear before the Senate, I reiterate that 

the People of Puerto Rico have a right to know the analysis performed, the studies, and the empirical data 

that is the basis of the economic projections established by the Board, with the passing of said bill. 

Thus, we request that in a term of no more than five (5) days, counted from the receipt of this 

communication, you send us the documents that support the economic projections of the aforementioned 

bill.

With nothing more to add.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-17 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc: EXHIBIT 15

Exhibit Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-17 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 84 (Monday, May 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10702]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than May 15, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Marion Edwin Lowery, Franklin, Tennessee; to acquire voting 
shares of Commerce Bancshares, Inc., Brownsville, Tennessee, and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Bank of Commerce, Trenton, 
Tennessee.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 25, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-10702 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SPECTRASITE HOLDINGS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         330,206
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,178
<INVENTORY>                                      5,649
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               416,347
<PP&E>                                       1,044,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,229,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,227
<BONDS>                                      1,261,526
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                     907,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,229,628
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,020
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,544
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (70,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       618
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (70,929)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (70,929)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.68)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the Quarterly Report  of  Allstates
WorldCargo, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending  March 31, 2006 as  filed  with  the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I,  Craig  D.  Stratton,
Chief Financial  Officer  of  the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
         company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
         operations of the Company for the periods presented.


Dated: May 15, 2006

/s/ Craig D. Stratton
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer



This  certification  has been furnished solely  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
---



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of House of Brussels
  Chocolates Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10- QSB for the period ending January
  31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the "Report"), I, Grant Petersen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        result of operations of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2004

| | /s/ Grant Petersen     
| | -----------------------
| | (Signature)            
| |                        
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | (Title)                

---
#### § 31.82 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness.

The applicant must prepare Instructions for Continued Airworthiness in accordance with appendix A to this part that are acceptable to the Administrator. The instructions may be incomplete at type certification if a program exists to ensure their completion prior to delivery of the first balloon or issuance of a standard certificate of airworthiness, whichever occurs later.

[Amdt. 31-4, 45 FR 60180, Sept. 11, 1980]
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Alton L. Boynton, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2006

/s/ Alton L. Boynton
----------------------------------
Alton L. Boynton
President (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 10.1
 
 [LOGO]
 
 
 June 25, 2010
 
 
 Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
 2706 Media Center Drive
 Los Angeles, CA  90065
 Attn:  Gary Rosenson
 
 Dear Gary:
 
 Reference is made to that certain Amended And Restated Affiliation And License Agreement For DTH Satellite Exhibition Of Programming between DIRECTV, Inc. ("Affiliate") and Playboy Entertainment Group and Spice Hot Entertainment, Inc. ("Programmer") made as of August 1, 2007 as extended by the Letter Agreements dated October 12, 2009, November 13, 2009, December 14, 2009, January 14, 2010, February 12, 2010 March 11, 2010 and April 8, 2010 (the "Agreement").
 
 Except as modified expressly below, all terms of the Agreement are hereby ratified and remain in full force and effect.  All capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them as set forth in the Agreement.
 
 Affiliate and Programmer hereby agree to extend the Term of the Agreement as set forth in Paragraph 6.(a) through the earlier of the parties entering into a replacement agreement or September 14, 2010.
 
 Very truly yours,
 
 DIRECTV, Inc.
 
 /s/ Toby Berlin
 
 Toby Berlin
 Vice President, Programming Acquisition
 
 
 ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
 
 
 PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC

SPICE HOT ENTERTAINMENT, INC.By:
/s/ Gary Rosenson

By:
/s/ Gary RosensonTitle:
SVP & GM

Title:
SVP & GM
 
 
 47163 v1
 2230 E. Imperial Hwy         El Segundo, CA 90245
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

RYAN WOLLNER

,

Plaintiff Below

, Appellant,

v.

PEARPOP INC.

,

Defendant Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 2 57 , 2022

§

§ Court Below

— Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ C.A. No. 2021

- 0157

§

§

§

Submitted: November 21, 2022

Decided: December 13 , 2022

ORDER

It appears to the Court that, on November 4, 2022 , the Chief Deputy Clerk

issued a notice, by certified mail and through File & ServeXpress , directing the

appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file

an opening brief and appendix. The opening brief and appendix were due by

October 13, 2022. Postal records confirm that the notice to show cause was

delivered on November 8, 2022

. A timely response to the notice to show cause was

due on or before November 18, 2022

. To date, the appellant has not filed an opening

brief or responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this appeal is th erefore

deemed to be unopposed.2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED , under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s / Gary F. Traynor

Justice
§ 25.789 Retention of items of mass in passenger and crew compartments and galleys. ( a ) Means must be provided to prevent each item of mass (that is part of the airplane type design) in a passenger or crew compartment or galley from becoming a hazard by shifting under the appropriate maximum load factors corresponding to the specified flight and ground load conditions, and to the emergency landing conditions of § 25.561(b).
( b ) Each interphone restraint system must be designed so that when subjected to the load factors specified in § 25.561(b)(3), the interphone will remain in its stowed position.
[Amdt. 25-32, 37 FR 3969, Feb. 24, 1972, as amended by Amdt. 25-46, 43 FR 50596, Oct. 30, 1978]
#### L. H. Sargent *v.*E. B. Townsend.

(No. 10,448.)

A certificate “subscribed and sworn to before me” is sufficient in form for a jurat.

Special Term. — On motion to dismiss the action by reason of an alleged defect in the jurat;

*Lincoln, Smith*& *Warnock,*for plaintiff

*W. L. Spooner,*for defendant.

Gholson, J.

A motion has been made in this case to *473dismiss the action, because the petition has not been properly-verified. The code provides that the officer before whom the affidavit is taken, shall “ certify that it was sworn to or affirmed before him, and signed in his presence.” Section III. In this case the certificate is “ subscribed and sworn to before me this 12th day of February, A. D. 1859.”

There can be no objection to the term “ subscribed,” it is found in section 105. “Every pleading in a court of record must be *subscribed*by the party or his attorney.” Is *subscribed before me,*then, equivalent to *subscribed in my presence.*I think it would be exceedingly technical to hold that it was not. While, therefore, it may, as a general rule, be better for notaries and other officers taking affidavits, to follow the language of the code, T can not think that either its words or the purposes of justice require such an objection as this to be sustained.

Motion overruled.'"
##### 



Exhibit 32
    (b)
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  August 8, 2007

/s/  Robert
    J. DellingerRobert J. DellingerExecutive Vice President
    and Chief Financial Officer