alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.14 to 10-K

AMENDMENT TO THE

CONVERGYS CORPORATION

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

The Convergys Corporation Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby amended effective January 1, 2005 in the following respects;

1. A new Section 3.6 is added
to the Plan to read as follows:

3.6 2005 Deferral Election. Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein to
the contrary, a Key Employee may make a deferral election with respect to any time-based restricted stock unit awards and restricted stock awards granted prior to December 31,2005 under the terms of the 1998 LTIP by submitting an election
agreement OP a form provided by the Committee on or before March 15.2005. A deferral election made under this Section shall only relate to awards that have not been paid nor have become payable as of the time of election.

2. A new Section 5.2.5 is added to the Plan to read as follows:

5.2.5 Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein to the contrary, the Committee (or its delegate), in its discretion, may allow
a Key Employee whose employment terminated during 2005 to cancel the deferral arrangement applicable to amounts deferred under the Plan as of a date subsequent to December 31, 2004 (including earnings on such amounts) and receive distribution
of such amounts immediately following- termination; provided, however, that no such cancellation shall apply to amounts that were earned and vested and to which the Key Employee had a legally binding right on or before December 31, 2004.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be executed and approved on December 21, 2005.



By:

/s/ James F. OrrTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Convergys Corporation
§ 217.4 Data collected (service classes). ( a ) The statistical classifications are designed to reflect the operating elements attributable to each distinctive class of service offered for scheduled, nonscheduled and charter service.
( b ) The service classes that foreign air carriers shall report on Schedule T-100(f) are: ( 1 ) F Scheduled Passenger/Cargo
( 2 ) G Scheduled All-Cargo
( 3 ) L Nonscheduled Civilian Passenger/Cargo Charter
( 4 ) P Nonscheduled Civilian All-Cargo Charter
( 5 ) Q Nonscheduled Services (Other than Charter). This service class is reserved for special nonscheduled cargo flights provided by a few foreign air carriers under special authority granted by the Department.
§ 171.49 Installation requirements. ( a ) The facility must be of a permanent nature, located, constructed, and installed according to ICAO Standards (Annex 10), accepted good engineering practices, applicable electric and safety codes, and FCC licensing requirements.
( b ) The facility must have a reliable source of suitable primary power, either from a power distribution system or locally generated. A determination by the Administrator as to whether a facility will be required to have stand-by power for the localizer, glide slope and monitor accessories to supplement the primary power, will be made for each airport based upon operational minimums and density of air traffic.
( c ) A determination by the Administrator as to whether a facility will be required to have dual transmitting equipment with automatic changeover for localizer and glide slope components, will be made for each airport based upon operational minimums and density of air traffic.
( d ) There must be a means for determining, from the ground, the perform- ance of the equipment (including antennae), initially and periodically.
( e ) The facility must have, or be supplemented by (depending on the circumstances) the following ground-air or landline communications services: ( 1 ) At facilities outside of and not immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, there must be ground-air communications from the airport served by the facility. The utilization of voice on the ILS frequency should be determined by the facility operator on an individual basis.
( 2 ) At facilities within or immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, there must be the ground-air communications required by paragraph (e)(1) of this section and reliable communications (at least a landline telephone) from the airport to the nearest FAA air traffic control or communications facility.
Paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section are not mandatory at airports where an adjacent FAA facility can communicate with aircraft on the ground at the airport and during the entire proposed instrument approach procedure. In addition, at low traffic density airports within or immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, and where extensive delays are not a factor, the requirements of paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section may be reduced to reliable communications (at least a landline telephone) from the airport to the nearest FAA air traffic control or communications facility, if an adjacent FAA facility can communicate with aircraft during the proposed instrument approach procedure down to the airport surface or at least to the minimum approach altitude. [Doc. No. 5034, 29 FR 11337, Aug. 6, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 171-6, 35 FR 10288, June 24, 1970; Amdt. 171-16, 56 FR 65664, Dec. 17, 1991]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1998             SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1997             SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998             JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                          15,466                   6,006
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,922                  49,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (26,445)                (27,535)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,367                  11,983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,871                  61,264
<PP&E>                                          12,297                  11,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,692)                 (5,943)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,254                  75,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,664                  75,605
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            14                      11
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,576                      42
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,254                  75,658
<SALES>                                        136,650                 102,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,525                 106,208
<CGS>                                           73,952                  55,688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,265                  91,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,260                  14,937
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,077                   6,125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,183                   8,812
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,183                   8,812
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88                    0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87                    0.63
        

</TABLE>
#### TECHNITROL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. NCR CORPORATION, Defendant-Ap-pellee and Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 74-1904, 74-1905.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued Feb. 21, 1975.

Decided April 18, 1975.

Theodore W. Anderson and William M. Wesley, Chicago, 111., for NCR Corp.

S. C. Yuter, New York City, for Tech-nitrol.

Before CUMMINGS, PELL and TONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Technitrol, Inc. appeals from an order granting summary judgment, based upon laches, in favor of the defendant NCR Corporation. Defendant NCR Corporation cross-appeals from the same order, arguing that it should have been awarded attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Although the District Court did not finally adjudicate the claims against another defendant, the order is appealable because it included a determination and direction for the entry of judgment as to NCR pursuant to Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. We affirm the judgment of the District Court in all respects and adopt Parts I through IV of the memorandum opinion and order of that court, Technitrol, Inc. v. Memorex Corp., 376 F.Supp. 828 (N.D.Ill.1974), as the opinion of this court.

Affirmed.
Order filed, January 09, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00854

- CR

____________ ARNULFO GARCIA CAN TU , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 56th District Court Galveston County, Te xas Trial Court Cause No. 12CR3324



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due December 27, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Amri Davidson , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.304 Service of documents. ( a ) *General requirements.* ( 1 ) An application for exemption and responsive pleadings shall be served as provided by § 302.7.
( 2 ) Applicants shall serve on the persons listed in paragraph (b) of this section a complete copy of the application and any supporting documents. Responsive pleadings shall be served on the same persons as applications.
( b ) *Persons to be served.* ( 1 ) Applicants for scheduled interstate air transportation authority shall serve: ( i ) All U.S. air carriers (including commuter air carriers) that publish schedules in the *Official Airline Guide* or the *Air Cargo Guide* for the city-pair market(s) specified in the application,
( ii ) The airport authority of each U.S. airport that the applicant proposes to serve, and
( iii ) Any other person who has filed a pleading in a related proceeding under section 41102, 41302, or 40109 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII.
( 2 ) Applicants for scheduled foreign air transportation authority shall serve: ( i ) All U.S. air carriers (including commuter air carriers) that publish schedules in the *Official Airline Guide* or in the *Air Cargo Guide* for the country-pair market(s) specified in the application,
( ii ) The airport authority of each U.S. airport that the applicant proposes to serve, and
( iii ) Any other person who has filed a pleading in a related proceeding under section 41102, 41302, or 40109 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII.
( 3 ) Applicants for charter-only or nonscheduled-only authority shall serve any person who has filed a pleading in a related proceeding under section 41102, 41302, or 40109 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII. However, applicants that file fewer than sixteen (16) days prior to the proposed start of service must also serve: ( i ) Those U.S. carriers (including commuter carriers) that are known to be operating in the general market(s) at issue and
( ii ) Those persons who may be presumed to have an interest in the subject matter of the application.
( 4 ) Applicants for slot exemptions under section 41714 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII shall serve: ( i ) All U.S. air carriers (including commuter air carriers) that publish schedules in the *Official Airline Guide* or the *Air Cargo Guide* for the airport(s) specified in the application,
( ii ) The manager of each of the affected airports,
( iii ) The mayor of the city that each affected airport serves,
( iv ) The Governor of the State in which each affected airport is located, and
( v ) Any other person who has filed a pleading in a related proceeding under section 41714 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII.
( 5 ) *Additional service.* The Department may, in its discretion, order additional service upon any other person.
[Doc. No. OST-97-2090, 65 FR 6457, Feb. 9, 2000; 65 FR 7418, Feb. 14, 2000]
# Official Journal C 207A/10 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 207A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5910 June 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 207A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5910 June 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2016/C 207A/1 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/302/15 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of audit | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2016/C 207A/1

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/302/15 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of audit

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren D. Knowlton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: April 2, 2007

 

 

| By:    | /s/ Warren D. Knowlton  |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Warren D. Knowlton      |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 25.1101 Carburetor air preheater design. Each carburetor air preheater must be designed and constructed to— ( a ) Ensure ventilation of the preheater when the engine is operated in cold air;
( b ) Allow inspection of the exhaust manifold parts that it surrounds; and
( c ) Allow inspection of critical parts of the preheater itself.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 3, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25645-25646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10944]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-00-128]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Piscataqua River, ME

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District has issued a 
temporary deviation from the existing drawbridge regulations for the 
Sarah M. Long (Route 1 Bypass) Bridge, mile 4.0, across the Piscataqua 
River between Kittery, Maine and Portsmouth, New Hampshire. This 
deviation allows the bridge owner to keep the bridge in the closed 
position for 5 hours, 12 p.m. through 5 p.m., on May 17, 2000. This 
deviation is necessary to facilitate electrical repairs at the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective on May 17, 2000.

[[Page 25646]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John McDonald, Project Officer, 
First Coast Guard District, (617) 223-8364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Sara Long (Route 1 Bypass) Bridge has a 
vertical clearance of 10 feet at mean high water and 18 feet at mean 
low water. The existing regulations for the bridge in 33 CFR 117.531(c) 
require the bridge to open on signal, except that; from 15 May through 
31 October, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., the draw need be opened only at 
quarter of and quarter after the hour for recreational vessels and 
commercial vessels less than 100 gross tons except as provided in 
paragraph (a)(1). Paragraph (a)(1) states that vessels over 100 gross 
tons, inbound ferry service vessels and inbound commercial fishing 
vessels shall be passed through the draw as soon as possible without 
delay at any time.
    The bridge owner, the New Hampshire Department of Transportation, 
asked the Coast Guard to allow the bridge to remain closed for 5 hours, 
12 p.m. through 5 p.m., on May 17, 2000, to facilitate electrical 
repairs at the bridge.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed 
with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as 
soon as possible. This deviation is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: April 24, 2000.
Robert F. Duncan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, First Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 00-10944 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
p.1 

OAR Box 1168 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

84) ll-C-13 

Docket Number: 

A-89-10 

Printed 4/29/2008 11:23:19 AM Sheet 84 of 131 
aT _ _ <*. 

% r 

UNITE D STATES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIC 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

O \r-,r-'* 

P.2 

A-89-10 

II-C-1 3 

vjrni_.t Uh 

POLICY. PLANNING AND EVALUATION 

Jim Kennedy 

E.I. Dupont de Nemours & 

1 Kingwood Place 

Kingwood, TX 77339 

Dear Jim: 

Co. 

Qi E li B « 15 i'-

Ur"——— • •• 

FEB 141991

 : 

I EPAAIR DQ"?7: 

*—•***•••****•• "" • _-____»..• -

On behalf of the Regulatory Negotiation Committee for 

Fugitive Emissions from Equipment Leaks, I would like to thank 

you for the time and energy spent in making arrangements for and 

conducting our recent plant visits. We all know how complicated 

arranging both the logistical and substantive detail of such a 

trip can be; your coordination of all of the details of the visit 

was outstanding. 

We appreciated the willingness of management and staff at 

the three plants to spend time talking with us and showing us 

their equipment and facilities. All of the members of the 

committee thought that the visit was very worthwhile. The visit 

was referenced many times during the next two days as the 

committee met to discuss how the new program should be 

structured. I am sure that it will be referenced again at 

future meetings. 

If you have further information that you think would be of 

use to the committee, please feel free to contact Tom Kittleman 

from DuPont or Bob Ajax from EPA. 

Please also express our thanks for the excellent driver 

service and very comfortable van to the convention services 

folks; their efficiency made the trip that much more enjoyable. 

4^t— 

Sip^erely yours, 

Deborah S. Dalton 

Executive Secretary 

Regulatory Negotiation Committee 

cc: fob Ajax, EPA 

Tom Kittleman, DuPont
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.17

                   FIRST AMENDMENT TO PRIME VENDOR AGREEMENT

     The First Amendment to Prime Vendor Agreement (the "First Amendment") is
by and between The Pharmacy Cooperative formerly known as Tennessee Pharmacy
Purchasing Alliance ("TPC") and D & K Healthcare Resources, Inc. ("D&K").


                                   RECITALS
                                   --------


     A.   The Parties entered in that certain prime Vendor Agreement dated as of
          August 25, 1999 (the "Prime Vendor Agreement").

     B.   The parties now wish to amend the prime Vendor Agreement.

     NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

     1.   The first sentence of Section 18 Term. of the Prime Vendor Agreement
          is hereby amended to read as follows:

          "This Agreement shall continue in effect until August 31, 2007, and
          unless sooner terminated as provided below, shall renew automatically
          thereafter for successive one (1) year terms, unless written
          cancellation notice is provided by either party at least thirty (30)
          days prior to the end of the then current term."

     2.   The Prime Vendor Agreement is hereby amended by adding a new Section
          32, Support, to read as follows:

          "D & K will provide full service distribution and field support to
          support the growth of TPC in the states contiguous to markets
          currently containing Members."



<PAGE>

Confidential portion omitted and filed separately with the Commission.



<PAGE>



     6.   All references in The Prime Vendor Agreement to TPPA and Tennessee
          Pharmacy Purchasing Alliance are hereby deemed to be references to TPC
          and The Pharmacy Cooperative, respectively.

     7.   This First Amendment shall be effective as of April 1, 2001.
                                                        -------------

     8.   In all other respects the provisions of the prime Vendor Agreement, as
          amended hereby, are expressly ratified and reaffirmed.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been duly executed by the
parties.


D & K HEALTHCARE RESOURCES, INC.           THE PHARMACY COOPERATIVE

By:/s/ Martin D. Wilson   date 3-27-01     By:/s/ Glynn Williams  date 3-19-2001
   ---------------------      --------        -------------------     ----------

Title:  President & COO                     Title: Chairman/CEO
      --------------------------------            ----------------------
#### Robertson *v.*Williams.

A writ of error will not lie from the High Court of Errors and Appeals to a magistrate’s court, on a proceeding of forcible entry and detainer. The remedy is by appeal to the Circuit Court.

IN ERROR.

Motion to dismiss the writ of error in this case.

Gholson, for the motion.

Howard, contra.

*Per Curiam.*

This was a proceeding for an unlawful detainer, which originated before a court organized according to the statute, and it is brought to this court by writ of error. A motion is now made to dismiss it for want of jurisdiction.

The summary possessory remedy for an unlawful detainer is given by statute, which secures the right of appeal to the circuit court when the trial is had *de novo.*A court organized for the trial of such action is composed of two'justiees of the peace of the county. They are for this particular purpose constituted a special court, having no other jurisdiction than to try the particular case, and when this is done, their functions as a court cease. They are no longer in existence as a court. This is a sufficient reason why a writ of error will not lie. There is no court on which it could operate. ' But in addition to this, the statute has secured the right of appeal to the circuit court, when the matter is tried *de novo,*and we are induced to conclude that it was never intended that any other remedy should be resorted to. It is not within the true meaning of the term a court; it is more properly an inquest, and we do not think the writ of error is the proper remedy.

Motion to dismiss sustained.