Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 89 / Monday, May 8, 2000 / Notices 26573

liquidate all appropriate entries without

regard to antidumping duties.

On April 20, 2000, the International

Trade Commission (ITC) determined

that revoking the existing antidumping

duty orders on EMD from Greece and

Japan would not be likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of material

injury within a reasonably foreseeable

time. Therefore, because the order will

be revoked as a result of the ITC’s

determination with an effective date of

January 1, 2000, no deposit

requirements will be effective for

shipments of the subject merchandise

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date of the final results of

this administrative review.

This notice also serves as a

preliminary reminder to importers of

their responsibility under 19 CFR

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate

regarding the reimbursement of

antidumping duties prior to liquidation

of the relevant entries during this

review period. Failure to comply with

this requirement could result in the

Secretary’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred and the subsequent assessment

of double antidumping duties.

We are issuing and publishing this

determination in accordance with

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the

Act.

Dated: May 1, 2000.

Troy H. Cribb,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–11462 Filed 5–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–570–803]

Heavy Forged Hand Tools from the

People’s Republic of China; Amended

Final Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Reviews in Accordance

With Court Decision

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Amended Final

Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review in accordance

with Court Decision.

SUMMARY: On February 8, 2000, the

Court of International Trade (CIT)

affirmed the remand determination of

the Department of Commerce (the

Department) arising from the

administrative reviews of the

antidumping duty orders on heavy

forged hand tools (HFHTs) from the

People’s Republic of China (PRC). See

Fujian Machinery & Equipment Import

& Export Corp., et. al v. United States,

CIT , Slip Op. 00–14, (February 8,

2000). No party appealed this decision.

As there is now a final and conclusive

court decision in this segment, we are

amending the final results of reviews in

this matter and will instruct the U.S.

Customs Service to liquidate entries

subject to these amended final results.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Strollo or Maureen Flannery,

Antidumping/Countervailing Duty

Enforcement, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington D.C. 20230; telephone (202)

482–5255 and (202) 482–3020,

respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On February 1, 1991, the Department

issued antidumping duty orders on

HFHTs from the PRC. See Antidumping

Duty Orders: Heavy Forged Hand Tools,

Finished or Unfinished, With or Without

Handles from the People’s Republic of

China, 56 FR 6622 (February 19, 1991)

(Antidumping Duty Orders). On April 4,

1996, the Department published its final

results of the third administrative

review of HFHTs for two PRC exporters,

Fujian Machinery and Equipment

Import and Export Corporation (FMEC)

and Shandong Machinery Import and

Export Corporation (SMC). See Heavy

Forged Hand Tools, Finished or

Unfinished, With or Without Handles,

from the People’s Republic of China;

Final Results of Antidumping

Administrative Review, 61 FR 15028

(April 4, 1996). On May 14, 1996, the

Department published its amended final

results of the third administrative

review of HFHTs. See Heavy Forged

Hand Tools, Finished or Unfinished,

With or Without Handles, From the

People’s Republic of China; Amendment

of Final Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review, 61 FR 24285

(May 14, 1996).

On September 7, 1999, the

Department filed with the CIT a consent

motion for voluntary remand so that the

Department may exclude statistics used

as surrogate values that were found to

be aberrational by the Department in the

Final Results of Redetermination

Pursuant to Court Remand relating to

the second administrative review. The

CIT granted the motion and remanded

to the Department on September 15,

1999.

On November 15, 1999, the

Department filed its final results

pursuant to remand. See Final Results of

Redetermination Pursuant to Court

Remand, Fujian Machinery and

Equipment Import & Export Corp., et. al

v. United States (November 15, 1999).

On February 8, 2000, the CIT upheld the

Department’s redetermination on

remand. Fujian Machinery & Equipment

Import & Export Corp., Shandong

Machinery Import & Export Corp., et al.

v. United States, CIT , Slip. Op 00–

14 (February 8, 2000). Neither party

appealed the CIT’s decision.

There is now a final and conclusive

court decision in this action; therefore,

we are amending our final results of

review for the period February 1, 1993

through January 31, 1994. We

recalculated margins on each product

category for FMEC and SMC. The

revised weighted average margins are as

follows:

Manufacturer/Exporter Margin

(percent)

Fujian Machinery & Equipment

Import & Export Corp.:

Axes/Adzes ............................ 5.68

Bars/Wedges ......................... 16.14

Hammers/Sledges ................. 8.90

Shandong Machinery Import &

Export Corp.:

Bars/Wedges ......................... 29.84

Hammers/Sledges ................. 10.02

Picks/Mattocks ....................... 52.60

Accordingly, the Department will

determine, and the Customs Service will

assess, antidumping duties on all entries

of subject merchandise from FMEC and

SMC in accordance with these amended

final results. For assessment purposes,

we have calculated importer-specific

duty assessment rates for each class or

kind of merchandise based on the ratio

of the total amount of antidumping

duties calculated for the examined sales

during the period of review (POR) to the

total quantity of sales examined during

the POR. The Department will issue

appraisement instructions directly to

Customs. The above rates will not affect

FMEC or SMC’s cash deposit rates

currently in effect, which continue to be

based on the margins found to exist in

the most recently completed review.

This notice is published in

accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the

Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19

CFR 351.221.

26574 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 89 / Monday, May 8, 2000 / Notices

Dated: April 27, 2000.

Troy H. Cribb,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–11463 Filed 5–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–570–803]

Heavy Forged Hand Tools From the

People’s Republic of China; Amended

Final Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Reviews in Accordance

With Court Decision

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of amended final results

of antidumping duty administrative

review in accordance with court

decision.

SUMMARY: On February 8, 2000, the

Court of International Trade (CIT)

affirmed the remand determination of

the Department of Commerce (the

Department) arising from the

administrative reviews of the

antidumping duty orders on heavy

forged hand tools (HFHTs) from the

People’s Republic of China (PRC). See

Fujian Machinery & Equipment Import

& Export Corp., et. al. v. United

States, CIT , Slip Op. 00–15

(February 8, 2000). No party appealed

this decision. As there is now a final

and conclusive court decision in this

segment, we are amending the final

results of reviews in this matter and will

instruct the U.S. Customs Service to

liquidate entries subject to these

amended final results.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Strollo or Maureen Flannery,

Antidumping/Countervailing Duty

Enforcement, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,

Washington DC 20230; telephone (202)

482–5255 and (202) 482–3020,

respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On February 1, 1991, the Department

issued antidumping duty orders on

HFHTs from the PRC. See Antidumping

Duty Orders: Heavy Forged Hand Tools,

Finished or Unfinished, With or Without

Handles from the People’s Republic of

China, 56 FR 6622 (February 19, 1991)

Antidumping Duty Orders). On October

1, 1996, the Department published its

final results of the fourth administrative

review of HFHTs for two PRC exporters,

Fujian Machinery and Equipment

Import and Export Corporation (FMEC)

and Shandong Machinery Import and

Export Corporation (SMC). See Heavy

Forged Hand Tools, Finished or

Unfinished, With or Without Handles,

From the People’s Republic of China;

Final Results of Antidumping

Administrative Review, 61 FR 51269

(October 1, 1996). On May 5, 1997, the

Department published its amended final

results of the fourth administrative

review of HFHTs. See Heavy Forged

Hand Tools from the People’s Republic

of China; Amendment of Final Result of

Antidumping Administrative Review, 62

FR 24416 (May 5, 1997).

On September 7, 1999, the

Department filed with the CIT a consent

motion for voluntary remand so that the

Department may exclude statistics used

as surrogate values that were found to

be aberrational by the Department in the

Final Results of Redetermination

Pursuant to Court Remand relating to

the second administrative review. The

CIT granted the motion and remanded

to the Department on September 15,

1999.

On November 15, 1999, the

Department filed its final results

pursuant to remand. See Final Results of

Redetermination Pursuant to Court

Remand, Fujian Machinery and

Equipment Import & Export Corp., et. al.

v. United States (November 15, 1999).

On February 8, 2000, the CIT upheld the

Department’s redetermination on

remand. Fujian Machinery & Equipment

Import & Export Corp., Shandong

Machinery Import & Export Corp., et al.

v. United States, CIT , Slip. Op 00–

15 (February 8, 2000). Neither party

appealed the CIT’s decision.

There is now a final court decision in

this action; therefore, we are amending

our final results of review for the period

February 1, 1994 through January 31,

1995. We recalculated margins on each

product category for FMEC and SMC.

The revised weighted average margins

are as follows:

Manufacturer/Exporter Margin

(percent)

Fujian Machinery & Equipment

Import & Export Corp.:

Axes/Adzes ............................ 1.84

Bars/Wedges ......................... 1.05

Hammers/Sledges ................. 1.23

Picks/Mattocks ....................... 65.11

Shandong Machinery Import &

Export Corp.:

Bars/Wedges ......................... 25.93

Hammers/Sledges ................. 4.77

Manufacturer/Exporter Margin

(percent)

Picks/Mattocks ....................... 52.82

Accordingly, the Department will

determine, and the Customs Service will

assess, antidumping duties on all entries

subject merchandise from FMEC and

SMC in accordance with these amended

final results. For assessment purposes,

we have calculated exporter-specific

duty assessment rates for each class or

kind of merchandise based on the ratio

of the total amount of antidumping

duties calculated for the examined sales

during the period of review (POR) to the

total quantity of sales examined during

the POR. We calculated exporterspecific assessment rates because there

was no information on the record which

indicated importers of record. The

Department will issue appraisement

instructions directly to Customs. The

above rates will not affect FMEC or

SMC’s cash deposit rates currently in

effect, which continue to be based on

the margins found to exist in the most

recently completed review.

This notice is published in

accordance with section 751(a)(1)) of the

Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1) and 19

CFR 351.221.

Dated: April 27, 2000.

Troy H. Cribb,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–11464 Filed 5–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–580–807]

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film From

Korea: Preliminary Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of preliminary results of

antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: In response to a request from

two respondents and two U.S.

producers, the Department of Commerce

(the Department) is conducting an

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,

and strip (PET film) from the Republic

of Korea. The review covers three

manufacturers/exporters of the subject

merchandise to the United States and