alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Newell *et al. v.*Briggs *et al.*

The sheriff made affidavit that he had served the citation on the attorney of records, for defendant in error to appear at the December term of said court, but had made diligent search for the citation and could not find it. It also appeared that fifteen days had elapsed since the plaintiff in error was bound to know that his citation had not been served, and no steps taken for an *alias*citation: *Held,*that the cause must be dismissed for laches of plaintiff in not applying for an *alias*citation.

MOTION to dismiss for want of citation.

Grayson, for the motion.

Fitch, *contra.*

Per Curiam, Pray J.

This canse is presented to us on a motion to dismiss the same for want of citation return served.

The motion is resisted upon an affidavit of A. G. Harrison, a deputy sheriff of Yazoo county, who states, “that on the 13th day of November, 1S3S, he executed in this case a-citation on S, M. Grayson, the attorney of record, for the defendants in error, to appear at the High Court of Errors and Appeals at the December term, 1838, to defend said suit. That he has made diligent search for the said citation but cannot find it.”

This affidavit relieves the plaintiff in error from all charge of *laches.*He has exercised all the diligence the law can require. The motion, therefore, as it is now presented, would be overruled, if no subsequent neglect had occurred. But there has been a lapse of fifteen days since he was bound to know that his process had not been returned; and no step has been taken for an *alias;*for this neglect the cause must be dismissed with damages and costs.
§ 29.1165 Engine ignition systems. ( a ) Each battery ignition system must be supplemented with a generator that is automatically available as an alternate source of electrical energy to allow continued engine operation if any battery becomes depleted.
( b ) The capacity of batteries and generators must be large enough to meet the simultaneous demands of the engine ignition system and the greatest demands of any electrical system components that draw from the same source.
( c ) The design of the engine ignition system must account for— ( 1 ) The condition of an inoperative generator;
( 2 ) The condition of a completely depleted battery with the generator running at its normal operating speed; and
( 3 ) The condition of a completely depleted battery with the generator operating at idling speed, if there is only one battery.
( d ) Magneto ground wiring (for separate ignition circuits) that lies on the engine side of any firewall must be installed, located, or protected, to minimize the probability of the simultaneous failure of two or more wires as a result of mechanical damage, electrical fault, or other cause.
( e ) No ground wire for any engine may be routed through a fire zone of another engine unless each part of that wire within that zone is fireproof.
( f ) Each ignition system must be independent of any electrical circuit that is not used for assisting, controlling, or analyzing the operation of that system.
( g ) There must be means to warn appropriate crewmembers if the malfunctioning of any part of the electrical system is causing the continuous discharge of any battery necessary for engine ignition.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-12, 41 FR 55473, Dec. 20, 1976]
##### 



Exhibit 32(b)
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  August 15, 2006

/s/  Robert
    J. DellingerRobert J. DellingerExecutive Vice President and Chief
    Financial Officer
§ 29.917 Design. ( a ) *General.* The rotor drive system includes any part necessary to transmit power from the engines to the rotor hubs. This includes gear boxes, shafting, universal joints, couplings, rotor brake assemblies, clutches, supporting bearings for shafting, any attendant accessory pads or drives, and any cooling fans that are a part of, attached to, or mounted on the rotor drive system.
( b ) *Design assessment.* A design assessment must be performed to ensure that the rotor drive system functions safely over the full range of conditions for which certification is sought. The design assessment must include a detailed failure analysis to identify all failures that will prevent continued safe flight or safe landing and must identify the means to minimize the likelihood of their occurrence.
( c ) *Arrangement.* Rotor drive systems must be arranged as follows: ( 1 ) Each rotor drive system of multiengine rotorcraft must be arranged so that each rotor necessary for operation and control will continue to be driven by the remaining engines if any engine fails.
( 2 ) For single-engine rotorcraft, each rotor drive system must be so arranged that each rotor necessary for control in autorotation will continue to be driven by the main rotors after disengagement of the engine from the main and auxiliary rotors.
( 3 ) Each rotor drive system must incorporate a unit for each engine to automatically disengage that engine from the main and auxiliary rotors if that engine fails.
( 4 ) If a torque limiting device is used in the rotor drive system, it must be located so as to allow continued control of the rotorcraft when the device is operating.
( 5 ) If the rotors must be phased for intermeshing, each system must provide constant and positive phase relationship under any operating condition.
( 6 ) If a rotor dephasing device is incorporated, there must be means to keep the rotors locked in proper phase before operation.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-12, 41 FR 55472, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 29-40, 61 FR 21908, May 10, 1996]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2637-2638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ID-070-1020-XQ]


Upper Snake River District Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Resource Advisory Council meeting locations and times.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C., the 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) council 
meeting of the Upper Snake River District Resource Advisory Council 
(RAC) will be held as indicated below. The agenda for this two-day 
meeting will include a training session for members on the first day, 
and discussions on Standards and Guides Monitoring and Phosphate 
Leasing on the second day. All meetings are open to the public. The 
public may present written or oral comments to the council.

[[Page 2638]]

Each formal council meeting will have a time allocated for hearing 
public comments. The public comment period for the council meetings is 
listed below. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment, 
and the time available, the time for individual oral comments may be 
limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need further information 
about the meetings, or need special assistance such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations should contact David 
Howell at the Upper Snake River District Office, 1405 Hollipark Dr., 
Idaho Falls, ID 83401, or telephone (208) 524-7559.

DATES AND TIMES: The next meeting will be held February 24-25, 2000 at 
the Best Western Hotel, 800 North Overland Avenue in Burley, Idaho. The 
meeting will start at 1 p.m. on February 24 for the RAC Training 
Session. The meeting will continue on February 25 at 8:30 a.m., with 
public comments scheduled from 8:40-9:10 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Howell, Upper Snake River 
District, 1405 Hollipark Dr., Idaho Falls, ID 83401, (208) 524-7559.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Resource Advisory Council 
is to advise the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a 
variety of planning and management issues associated with the 
management of the of the public lands.

    Dated: January 5, 2000.
James E. May,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-1105 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
Exhibit 32
 
 
 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Playboy Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Scott N. Flanders and Christoph Pachler each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Scott N. FlandersName:
Scott N. FlandersTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
August 6, 2010/s/ Christoph PachlerName:
Christoph PachlerTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
August 6, 2010
 
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to Playboy Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Playboy Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3947 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3947

  To amend the provisions relating to the higher education emergency 
relief fund to clarify the flexibility provided to institutions and for 
            students under the fund, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2020

   Mr. Kaine introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the provisions relating to the higher education emergency 
relief fund to clarify the flexibility provided to institutions and for 
            students under the fund, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coronavirus Relief Flexibility for 
Students and Institutions Act''.

SEC. 2. HIGHER EDUCATION RELIEF FUND.

    Section 18004 of division B of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 
Economic Security Act (Public Law 116-136) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ``determines have 
        the'' and inserting ``determines, through an application 
        process, demonstrate the'';
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by striking ``cover any costs associated with 
                significant changes to the delivery of instruction due 
                to the coronavirus'' and inserting ``defray expenses 
                (including lost revenue, reimbursement for expenses 
                already incurred, technology costs associated with a 
                transition to distance education, faculty and staff 
                training, and payroll)'';
                    (B) by striking ``Institutions'' and inserting 
                ``Notwithstanding any provision of the Higher Education 
                Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), institutions''; 
                and
                    (C) by inserting ``, with the eligibility and 
                selection of the students receiving such grants being 
                determined solely by each such institution'' before the 
                period at the end; and
            (3) in subsection (d)(1)--
                    (A) by inserting ``determining grant recipients 
                and'' after ``In''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, by application under such 
                section 18004(a)(3),'' after ``demonstrates''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1

                          TRANSFER OF SERVICE AGREEMENT

Spice Hot Entertainment, Inc., ("Former Customer"), having its principal place
of business at 2706 Media Center Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90065, requests that
Intelsat USA Sales Corp., as successor in right and interest to Loral SpaceCom
Corporation, doing business as Loral Skynet(R) ("SKYNET"), transfer and assign
the following service to Andrita Studios, Inc. ("New Customer"), having its
principal place of business at 3030 Andrita St., Los Angeles, CA 90065.

Service to be transferred and assigned: Transponder Service, as described in
Agreement T79903021 between SKYNET and Cattle Entertainment Group, Inc. dated
effective February 8, 1999 and later transferred to Former Customer by a
Transfer of Service Agreement dated effective as of July 6, 2001 (the
"Agreement"). The Agreement was then modified by a letter agreement between
Former Customer and SKYNET dated February 28, 2002, which letter agreement
stated the Service had been moved from the satellite then known as Telstar 5
(now IA5) to Telstar 7 (now IA7), and that the end of life for IA7 replaced the
end of life date for IA5 in the Agreement. Service under this Agreement consists
of one 36MHz 20W C-band Fully Protected transponder (the "Service") on
transponder C-5 of the IA-7 satellite, which Service shall continue through the
end or life of IA7, which is currently estimated to be on or about October 31,
2014.

The transfer and assignment will be effective as of October 1, 2004. This
Transfer of Service Agreement acknowledges that New Customer agrees to assume
all obligations of Former Customer at the time of transfer and that New
Customer, through its parent, Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. will make all
payments pursuant to the Agreement. These obligations may include and era not
limited to: (1) all outstanding indebtedness for the Service, (2) the unexpired
portion of the original term of Service and revenue commitment(s), and (3) any
unexpired termination liability(ies). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Former
Customer agrees to remain jointly and severally liable with New Customer for any
and all payment obligations assumed by New Customer hereunder.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

FORMER CUSTOMER                                         NEW CUSTOMER
<S>                                                     <C>
By: /s/ Alexandra Shepard                               By: /s/ Alexandra Shepard
    (Signature of Authorized Representative)                (Signature of Authorized Representative)

Print: Alexandra Shepard                                Print: Alexandra Shepard

Title: SVP                                              Title:  VP

Date: 10-26-04                                          Date: 10-26-04

Agreed to by Intelsat USA Sales Corp.:


By: /s/ Stephen R. Spengler
     (Signature of Authorized Representative)

Print: Stephen R. Spengler

Title: President, Intelsat USA Sales Corp.

Date: 10-28-04
</TABLE>
#### § 254.4 Carrier liability.

On any flight segment using large aircraft, or on any flight segment that is included on the same ticket as another flight segment that uses large aircraft, an air carrier shall not limit its liability for provable direct or consequential damages resulting from the disappearance of, damage to, or delay in delivery of a passenger's personal property, including baggage, in its custody to an amount less than $3,800 for each passenger.

[72 FR 3943, Jan. 29, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 70592, Nov. 21, 2008; 78 FR 14914, Mar. 8, 2013; 80 FR 30147, May 27, 2015; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2020-0251, 86 FR 2539, Jan. 13, 2021]
Exhibit
32.2
  Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Knot, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Mueller, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  By:
              /s/
      John P. MuellerJohn
      P. Mueller
                Chief
      Financial Officer
  Date:
March 12, 2010
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)**

**OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Brian P. McAndrews, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of aQuantive, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 7, 2004
§ 25.1326 Pitot heat indication systems. If a flight instrument pitot heating system is installed, an indication system must be provided to indicate to the flight crew when that pitot heating system is not operating. The indication system must comply with the following requirements: ( a ) The indication provided must incorporate an amber light that is in clear view of a flight crewmember.
( b ) The indication provided must be designed to alert the flight crew if either of the following conditions exist: ( 1 ) The pitot heating system is switched “off”.
( 2 ) The pitot heating system is switched “on” and any pitot tube heating element is inoperative.
[Amdt. 25-43, 43 FR 10339, Mar. 13, 1978]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jitu Banker, Chief Financial Officer of Gateway International Holdings, Inc.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)) and that  information  contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005,  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Gateway
International Holdings, Inc.


By:   /s/ Jitu Banker
      -------------------------
Name: Jitu Banker
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 2, 2005
Exhibit 4

Schedule 2.01 to Credit Agreement

dated as of February 13, 2009

Schedule 2.01

Commitments
and Applicable Percentages



|                           |  |            |             |  |                                            |               
|-------------------------- |  | ---------- | ----------- |  | ------------------------------------------ | --------------
|Lender                     |  | Commitment |             |  | ApplicablePercentage
ofAggregateCommitment
|Bank of America, N.A.      |  | $          | 25,000,000  |  |                                            | 25.000000000% 
|RBS Citizens, N.A.         |  | $          | 25,000,000  |  |                                            | 25.000000000% 
|Wachovia Bank, N.A.        |  | $          | 15,000,000  |  |                                            | 15.000000000% 
|KeyBank, N.A.              |  | $          | 15,000,000  |  |                                            | 15.000000000% 
|The Northern Trust Company |  | $          | 10,000,000  |  |                                            | 10.000000000% 
|U.S. Bank N.A.             |  | $          | 10,000,000  |  |                                            | 10.000000000% 
|TOTAL                      |  | $          | 100,000,000 |  |                                            | 100.000000000%