alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MOORMAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. JOHN M. HAACK.1

December 15, 1916.

Nos. 19,988—(129).

Sale — action for purchase price — pleading and proof of plaintiff’s incorporation.

In an action to recover for merchandise alleged and admitted to have been sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant, the fact of the incorporation of the plaintiff is not a material allegation and need not be proved.

Action in the district court for Murray county to recover $75. The case was tried before Nelson, J., who when plaintiff rested granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the action because of plaintiff’s failure to prove that plaintiff was a corporation existing by virtue of the laws of Illinois. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, plaintiff appealed.

Reversed.

*Manly P. Thornton,*for appellant.

*A. W. Tierney,*for respondent.

1

Reported In 160 N. W. 258.

Dibell, C.

Action to recover for merchandise sold and delivered. The action was *127dismissed at the close of the plaintiff’s testimony and judgment was entered. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

The complaint alleges that the defendant is an Illinois corporation. The defendant specifically denies it. There was no proof of incorpo-. ration. The sale and delivery of the merchandise is conceded. The action was dismissed because of lack of proof of thg incorporation of the plaintiff. The fact of corporate existence was not a material issue. It was not necessary to prove it. Finch, Van Slyck & McConville v. Le Sueur County Co-operative Co. 128 Minn. 73, 150 N. W. 226; Holden v. Great Western Ele. Co. 69 Minn. 527, 72 N. W. 805, 65 Am. St. 505. Whether the defendant’s denial was sufficient under G. S. 1913, § 7774 (E. L. 1905), § 4148, we need not consider.

Judgment reversed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.502 Institution of proceedings.

A proceeding to determine the lawfulness of rates, fares, or charges for the foreign air transportation of persons or property by aircraft, or the lawfulness of any classification, rule, regulation, or practice affecting such rates, fares or charges, may be instituted by the filing of a petition or complaint by any person, or by the issuance of an order by the Department.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary  financial information extracted from
Forstmann & Company, Inc.'s condensed financial statements for the twenty-
six weeks ended May 4, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety be reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-02-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-04-1997
<CASH>                                              48
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,635
<INVENTORY>                                     44,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,934
<PP&E>                                          56,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,005
<BONDS>                                          2,690
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,655
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,612)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,373
<SALES>                                         96,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,004
<CGS>                                           81,235
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,981
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   429
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,047
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  8,325
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,278)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.94)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-157-003]

May 4. 2000.

Take notice that on April 28, 2000, Kern River Gas Transmission Company (Kern River) tendered the following tariff sheets for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, to be effective February 1, 2000.

Second Substitute Original Sheet No. 143

Second Substitute Original Sheet No. 144

Original Sheet No. 145

Original Sheet No. 146

Sheet Nos. 147-199 (Reserved)

Kern River states that the purpose of this filing is comply with the Commission's April 13, 2000 Order in this proceeding, which directed Kern River to revise certain language related to the bid evaluation and award criteria for negotiated rate bids. 

Kern River states that it has served a copy of this filing upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​      ( print page 30101)    rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11617  Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
631 A.2d 77

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. William Edward GALLAGHER, Jr.

Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 37,

Sept. Term, 1993.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Sept. 27, 1993.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Consent to Disbarment from the practice of law filed by William Edward Gallagher, Jr., in accordance with Maryland Rule BV12 d 2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 27th day of September, 1993

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that William Edward Gallagher, Jr. be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of William Edward Gallagher, Jr., from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule BV13, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
US Fish & Wildlife Service

Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge

Jefferson County, CO
, i £
z ‘ Marshall Lake a
LA ‘ Fy
vat / 3
— ' we
/, iY 5,
~ \ ~ SS.
an &
S
i ay
ee ee eee ee PS ae

TeFFerson county

Reservoir
= Expansion
stern : |
Coal Creek — }
Canyon Park — *

Northwest Corridor
“Transportation

Project
Stondley
take
\ a welton
\ tater ja
+ Vauxmont er a
1 Development a | -
, | ]
t —— |
—TM4
\ Toke
. 1
‘ |
a. i |= 4
Reasonably Foreseeable Activities a 1 2 Miles A
Open Space December 2003 N

DOE Retained Area (Subject to Change)
Permitted Mining Area
4k Suggested Cold War Museum Locations

Surrounding Trail Faci
= bristing Trail
Proposed Trail

Figure no. 9
§ 323.12 General requirements for objections and answers. ( a ) Each objection and answer filed under this part shall, unless otherwise specified, conform to the procedural rules of general applicability in subpart A of part 302 of this chapter.
( b ) Each objection shall be titled “Objection to Termination, Suspension, or Reduction of Air Service,” and shall identify the notice to which it responds. Each answer shall be titled “Answer to Objection to Termination, Suspension, or Reduction of Air Service,” and shall identify the objection to which it responds.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of GB&TBancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Richard A. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Richard A. Hunt                      |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Richard A. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

March 16, 2005

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to GB&T Bancshares, Inc. and willbe retained by GB&T and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### In the Matter of the Liquidation of National Surety Company. National Bondholders Corporation et al., Appellants; Commercial Investment Trust Corporation et al., Respondents.

(Argued October 16, 1936;

decided November 17, 1936.)

*614
      *Ralph Wolf, Edwin D. Hays, Solomon I. Sklar*and *James M. Crossman*for National Bondholders Corporation, appellant.

*J. Seymour Montgomery, Jr.,*and *John S. Montgomery*for Protective Committee for Unsecured Creditors of National Surety Company, appellant.

*615
      *Maxwell Brandwen, Irvine J. Shubert, Ambrose Doskow*and *Mortimer B. Wolf*for Independent Committee for National Surety Company Stockholders, appellant.

*Max D. Steuer, Phillip W. Haberman, Sr., Sol M. Stroock, Harold F. Birnbaum*and *Sidney O. Friedman*for Commercial Investment Trust Corporation, respondent.

*Edward F. Keenan*and *Samuel Boksenbom*for Superintendent of Insurance, respondent.

*Thomas E. White*for Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard Wayne, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Crossing PreferredCorporation (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Not applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: November 8, 2006 By:  /s/ Richard Wayne   Richard Wayne   *President  (Principal Executive Officer)*  
26
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2607-1 Filed:02/26/18 Entered:02/28/18 14:08:38 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2607-1 Filed:02/26/18 Entered:02/28/18 14:08:38 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23.2

ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-112729, 333-111991, 333-109925,
333-108422, 333-106252, 333-100583, 333-89985, 333-47074, and 333-36144) on Form S-3 and
(333-100582, 333-87714, 333-83287, 333-66995, 333-56308, 333-34020, 333-35306, and 333-83287) on
Form S-8 of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2002, except for footnotes 3 and 4(b) to the consolidated financial statements in the Current Report on
Form 8-K/A of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. dated December 19, 2002, which are as of October 15, 2002, relating to 24/7 Real Media, Inc. and subsidiaries' consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. dated March 24, 2004.

Our
report dated March 29, 2002, except for footnotes 3 and 4(b) to the consolidated financial statements in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of 24/7
Real Media, Inc. dated December 19, 2002, which are as of October 15, 2002, contains two explanatory paragraphs. The first explanatory paragraph states that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations since inception and has a working capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty. The second explanatory paragraph states that the Company revised the consolidated financial statements
and footnotes to reflect the sale of its IMAKE subsidiary as a discontinued operation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

| |  | /s/KPMG LLP
| |  | -----------

New
York, New York
March 24, 2004

---

QuickLinks
July 7 , 2015

Mr. Justin Quigley

2413 S outh Lillian Avenue

Sioux Falls, SD 57106

Dear Mr. Quigley :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your April 9 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0944 ), but

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, h ow it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional i nformation, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any ques tions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MULTI-LINK TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, (the
"Report"), I, Kevin R. Keating, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1)    The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


Date:  May 4, 2006

                                                   /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   and Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frances Dingfeldt, Respondent, against Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Company, Inc., et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

(Argued September 30, 1936;

decided November 24, 1936.)

*Paul Koch, Patrick S. Mason*and *William Seidl*for the appellants.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

*624Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
§ 29.27 Center of gravity limits. The extreme forward and aft centers of gravity and, where critical, the extreme lateral centers of gravity must be established for each weight established under § 29.25. Such an extreme may not lie beyond— ( a ) The extremes selected by the applicant;
( b ) The extremes within which the structure is proven; or
( c ) The extremes within which compliance with the applicable flight requirements is shown.
[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 965, Jan. 26, 1968]
#### In the Matter of James Aiken, Respondent, v County of Onondaga et al., Appellants.

[698 NYS2d 211]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Major, J. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Major, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Pine,-J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1* LAS VEGAS FROM HOME.COM ENTERTAINMENT INC. AMOUNTS RECEIVABLE/(PAYABLE) FROM RELATED PARTIES AND UNDERWRITERS
PROMOTERS AND EMPLOYEES OTHER THAN RELATED PARTIES Schedule I Balance,End of periodBalance, Beginning
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Amount
    
    
    ReceivableName of Debtor
    

of
Period
    
    
    Additions
    
    
    Collected/Paid
    
    
    Written off
    
    
    (Payable)2004J. Kalpakian
    
    $
    (13,631
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3,375
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    (10,256
    )B. Kalpakian
    
    
    5,650
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3,919
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,731Bronx Ventures Inc.
    
    
    140,832
    
    
    
    230,515
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    371,347Webscape/David Neale **
    
    
    (54
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    54
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2003J. Kalpakian
    
    $
    (48,929
    )
    
    $
    35,298
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (13,631
    )B. Kalpakian
    
    
    (26,369
    )
    
    
    32,019
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    5,650Bronx Ventures Inc.
    
    
    (26,821
    )
    
    
    167,653
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    140,832Webscape/David Neale **
    
    
    (54
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (54
    )2002J. Kalpakian
    
    $
    (1,454
    )
    
    $
    (47,475
    )
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (48,929
    )B. Kalpakian
    
    
    (7,076
    )
    
    
    (19,293
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (26,369
    )Bronx Ventures Inc.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (26,821
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (26,821
    )Webscape/David Neale **
    
    
    (5,057
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3,000
    
    
    
    2,003
    
    
    
    (54
    )
   **
    
    David Neale, a Director of Webscape, resigned as a Director of LVFH during June 2002, and is
no longer a related party to the Company.
§ 38.17 Fuel efficiency limits. ( a ) The fuel efficiency limits in this section are expressed as maximum permitted fuel efficiency metric values, as calculated under § 38.11.
( b ) The fuel efficiency metric value of an airplane subject to this part may not exceed the following, rounded to three decimal places: