alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 29.1049 Hovering cooling test procedures. The hovering cooling provisions must be shown— ( a ) At maximum weight or at the greatest weight at which the rotorcraft can hover (if less), at sea level, with the power required to hover but not more than maximum continuous power, in the ground effect in still air, until at least five minutes after the occurrence of the highest temperature recorded; and
( b ) With maximum continuous power, maximum weight, and at the altitude resulting in zero rate of climb for this configuration, until at least five minutes after the occurrence of the highest temperature recorded.
BRAD ELLSW0RT>1 

OcFARTMENTOF 

•^^ANSPORTATION 

. '-.<ET OPERATIONS 

2m on -1 A fo=' 

Consresfsf of tlie Hmteb Btatt^ 

limine of jEUprtftntotibtct 

WUaiittngfm, JBC 20515-1403 

ARMED SEFMCCS 

9e«nM0iMsi EjvfmoHMV Fown' 

TpimaaH UncowMmMML TWIM:I, 

AHDI 

AGRICULTURE 

August 25,2010 

AUG S A 20!0 

EMAI L BUSWESS 

The Honorable Ray LftHood D 

Secictary of TiaBspoTtafiDn 

U.S. Dqntrtmort of TraosportatioD 

400 7th Street, S.W„ Wnshiiigtoii D.C 20590 

Re: EvansvUleRegiODalAiFpOTt 

7801 Bussing Drive 

EvansvHle, IN 47725 

Small CommuDxty Air Service Developmenl (SCASDO) gcaiit q>pIicaiion 

Dear Seczetary LaHood: 

I tun pleased to mpport the Small Commmii^ Ak Service DeYelopmcot (SCASDO) 

grant q>plicaiion that is being submitted by the Evansville Regional Aiipart. 

Tbc Evsnsville RegLtmal Aiiport plays a key role in coimecting scnthem Indima and 

northwest Kentucky to the real of the nsAiofL But the Aiiport bu, fiir too kog, been 

saddled with high overage aiiftres, siqipnssing travel. Emd fincing businesses to look 

elsewdiere when thinking flbont expansiotL 

In die Oroet Lakes region EvuBville has (he highest avei^e faces - awagnig $225 eaxb 

way as of the year ended first cpaa a 2010, or S4S0 rDundtrq>. Evamvilk is the single 

most expensive mediuio-sized maikBt in vi^iich to fly in or out in te entire Great Lakes 

region. 

II could get worse fhb Ml, as Delta Air Lines, following its merger with Northwest, l)as 

amounced it will leave the Evansville-Memi^s maiket. This loss of seats ml] 

exaoezfoate the &» pressure in the BvansvUle market - the Aiipoil must do somethmg to 

faring lower ftres to the region. 

Low £u« leader AirTian has expressed interest io Bcrving Evansville. But in order for 

AirTran to take a risk in launching service to a new dty hi the affrent economic 

environment, it will reqviie a revenue guarantee to ofbetpotential losses during the startup phase. * 

Ml HM H(NiM Ltmw tat, JK. •»»* » 

ftoMIM 

frii¥Miiii.tlinTtl 

WIM 

Svni1« 

TwaHMKX 

»I4 

>Mio« Kaaa OnKi uuv a 

MttnMtM 

Tcu H K n n m-m? 

Evansville Regional Airport - Small Communily Air Service Development Grant - August 2010 
I believe that this grant is extremely important for this community. Every commnni^ 

that receives assistance from this ^rant will continue to harvest he benefits fen- many years 

to come. It affords them the opportunity to upgrade and mmntaizi higha stamfards for 

their community, with minimal expense to Oielr budget. 

I support &e Small Community Air Snvice Development (SCASDG) grant application 

that is betng submittsd by the Evansville Regional Airport and I personally feel &ey 

would be a very worthy recipient. ThatA you vea^ much for your time and sttendon to 

thismattCF. PleasedonothcritatetocontactmeiflcanbeofassistasceasyDnnuke 

your detenninations. 

Sincerely, 

Bead Ellsworth 

Member of Congress 

BB/ab 

E-vcnsville Regional Airport -Smal l Communiry Air Service Development Granf - August 2010 O
#### Bower v. Schadt

*J. A. Stranahan*and *Stranahan & Sampson,*for plaintiff.

*Hiram H. Drake,*for defendant.

March 12, 1958.

Rodgers, P. J.,

This matter concerns an appeal from the judgment entered for defendant before a justice of the peace. Plaintiff, Mamie Bower, within 20 days of the entry of the judgment in this matter, filed her appeal and attached what purported to be a bail in unnamed sum for the payment of all costs accrued or which may be legally recovered against appellant. This bail is insufficient because it does not state an amount certain and is not accompanied by surety.

Defendants ask that the appeal be stricken because of this deficiency.

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in McIlhaney v. Holland, 111 Pa. 684, 636, states:

> *703“Where a defective recognizance has been entered, the appellant may be permitted to perfect it. See, also, New Castle Metal Products Company v. Campbell, 131 Pa. Superior Court 367, 369.

. The cases cited by defendant refer to those in which there has been undue delay or where no recognizance was entered.

. Here an attempt was made to comply with the statute and plaintiff, by her answer, stands ready to perfect the bail.

*Order*

And now, March 12, 1958, the petition and motion of defendants are denied. Plaintiff, Mamie Bower, is directed to file her bail with surety and in an amount certain within 10 days of the entry of this order.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 1 6 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk September 1 6 , 2020

16 1 672 ( 55 )

CHARLETTE LEGION

- LONDON, also known

as CHARLETTE LEGION, also known as

CHARLETTE LONDON,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 161672

v COA: 344838

Oakland CC: 2016

- 155115

- NH

THE SURGICAL INSTITUTE OF

MICHIGAN AMBULATORY SURGERY

CENTER, LLC, MICHIGAN BRAIN &

SPINE PHYSICIANS GROUP, PLLC, and

ARIA SABIT, M.D.,

Defendants

- Appell e e s,

and

KEVIN CRAWFORD, D.O., P.C., and

KEVIN CRAWFORD, D.O.,

Defendants

- Appellants

.

______________________________________ /

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of defendant s

- appellant s to extend the

time for filing their reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if

submitted on or before September 28 , 2020.
August 5, 2015

Mrs. Lisa Duffy

4012 West Lake Drive

Irwin, PA 15642

Dear Mrs. Duffy:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your April 8, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA-2015-0962, but 

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

Thuy Cooper

Senior Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jack H. Lehman, Appellant, against Frederick L. Moore-head, as Warden of the City Prison, Brooklyn, Respondent.

(Submitted November 16, 1936;

decided November 24, 1936.)

Motion for reargument or to amend remittitur denied.(See 272 N. Y. 531.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATE OF THE
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer of
Auriga Laboratories, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of
my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Philip S. Pesin Philip S. Pesin
Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            8482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1402
<ALLOWANCES>                                        92
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10282
<PP&E>                                           71246
<DEPRECIATION>                                    7294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  315750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11031
<BONDS>                                         107374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       95621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    315750
<SALES>                                          41524<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 41524<F1>
<CGS>                                            13326<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    40144<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14358<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12820)<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                       135<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12955)<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0<F1>
<CHANGES>                                            0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12955)<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 9, 1998 TO DECEMBER
31, 1998.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 29.241 Ground resonance.

The rotorcraft may have no dangerous tendency to oscillate on the ground with the rotor turning.
§ 385.17 Authority of the Assistant General Counsel for Regulation and Enforcement. The Assistant General Counsel for Regulation and Enforcement has authority to: ( a ) Call public meetings in pending rulemaking proceedings,
( b ) Issue a notice suspending the effective dates of final regulations issued by the General Counsel pending Departmental determination of review proceedings instituted thereon, whether by petition or upon order of the Department. (Such a notice is not subject to the review procedures of subpart C of this part.), and
( c ) Approve or disapprove, for good cause shown, requests to extend the time for filing comments on all proposed or final new or amended regulations, and requests to extend comment periods following the issuance of final rules.
[Doc. No. T-1, 49 FR 50985, Dec. 31, 1984. Redesignated by Doc. No. OST-96-1268, 61 FR 19170, May 1, 1996]
#### In the Matter of J & M Broadway Restaurant Inc., Petitioner, v New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

[699 NYS2d 27]

—Determination of respondent State Liquor Authority dated March 16, 1998 which revoked petitioner’s on-premises restaurant wine license, with monetary sanctions, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Diane Lebedeff, J.], entered August 6, 1998), dismissed, without costs.

The determination that petitioner served alcohol during prohibited hours on five separate occasions and engaged in other serious misconduct is supported by substantial evidence *(see, e.g., Matter of De Russo v New York State Liq. Auth., 222*AD2d 809). The penalty does not shock our sense of fairness *(see, Matter of Warsaw Wines & Liqs. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*245 AD2d 146, *lv denied*91 NY2d 806). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.6
 CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
   1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
  /s/ Glenn J. ChamandyName:
    Glenn J. ChamandyTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
   1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
  /s/ Laurence G. SellynName:
    Laurence G. SellynTitle:
    Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial and
Administrative Officer
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 448 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit fellowship and 

stipend compensation to be saved in an individual retirement account. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2019 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. LEE, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. SCOTT of South 

Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

fellowship and stipend compensation to be saved in an 

individual retirement account. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Graduate Student Sav5 ings Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CERTAIN NON-TUITION FELLOWSHIP AND STIPEND 

7 PAYMENTS TREATED AS COMPENSATION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 219(f) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by addVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:12 Feb 22, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S448.IS S448

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 448 IS

1 ing at the end the following: ‘‘Such term includes any 

2 amount paid to an individual to aid the individual in the 

3 pursuit of graduate or postdoctoral study or research.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ICATECH CORPORATION and 

EMPRESAS ICA, S.A.B. DE. C.V.,

 Defendants and Counterclaim 

 Plaintiffs Below,

 Appellants,

v.

PAUL V. FACCHINA, SR., individually 

and as Sellers’ Representative,

 Plaintiff and Counterclaim 

 Defendant Below, 

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 121, 2021

Court Below – Superior Court 

of the State of Delaware

 C.A. No. N17C-09-163 

Submitted: December 23, 2021

Decided: January 4, 2022

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, VAUGHN, TRAYNOR and

MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.

ORDER

This 4

th day ofJanuary, 2022, having considered the appellant’s motion for rehearing 

en Banc of the December 9, 2021 Order affirming the judgment of the Superior Court, the 

Court concludes that the motion for rehearing en Banc is without merit and should be denied. 
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for rehearing en Banc is 

DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves

Justice
#### Trust Company of North America, Appellant, *v.*A. Hammer Cooperage Corporation, Respondent.

(Argued June 3, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*480
      *Harold Wisan, Charles Goldman*and *Harold Dublirer*for appellant.

*I. Maurice Wormser*and *George G. Lake*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. (See 272 N, Y. 513.)

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubrs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, J.
#### § 300.9 Disqualification of partners of DOT employees.

No partner of a DOT employee shall act as agent or attorney for anyone other than the United States in any DOT proceeding or matter in which such employee participates or has participated personally and substantially through decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, rendering advice, investigation, or otherwise, or which is the subject of his or her official responsibility.

[Docket No. 82, 50 FR 2380, Jan. 16, 1985. Redesignated and amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019]
EX-99

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Playboy Enterprises,
Inc. ("the Company") for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"),
Christie Hefner, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Linda G. Havard,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christie Hefner
-------------------------------
Name: Christie Hefner
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 8, 2002


/s/ Linda G. Havard
-------------------------------
Name: Linda G. Havard
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 8, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,



As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of XO Group Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Steib, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: August 2, 2018 | By: | /s/ Michael Steib
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------
|                     |     | Name:            
|                     |     | Title:           
|                     |     |
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 213 (Thursday, November 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 68257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28491]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending October 15, 2011

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0190.
    Date Filed: October 12, 2011.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: November 2, 2011.
    Description: Application of Laser Airlines, C.A. (``Laser'') 
requesting an exemption and a foreign air carrier permit authorizing 
Laser to provide: (i) Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, 
property and mail between Caracas, Venezuela (``CCS''), on the one 
hand, and Fort Lauderdale, Florida (``FLL''), on the other hand; and 
(ii) charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail 
between Maiquetia (``MIQ''), Valencia (``VLN'') and Margarita Island 
(``PMV''), Venezuela, on the one hand, and FLL, on the other hand, and 
other charter flights.

Renee V. Wright,
 Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-28491 Filed 11-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !( !(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(!(

!( !(

!( !(

!( !( !( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

87 86

912

843

783

737

644

7347

7345

7305

7268

7266 7263

7244

6030

6028

5496 5497

5495

5494

5483

5482

5481

5480

3801

3800 3798

3796 3794 3786

2976

2255

2060 2058

2057 2056

2048

2045 2046 2044

1870

1692

1645

1445 1446

1424

1334

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, National Elevation Dataset, Geographic Names

Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures

Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; U.S. Census Bureau - TIGER/Line; HERE Road Data

 ́

SPS Water Rights Boundary

47,188 Acres