alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Robert P. May, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofRenaissance Media Group LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana)LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and Renaissance MediaCapital Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  [Reserved];  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 31, 2005
/s/ Robert P. May
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-51125

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO JAVIAR RIVERA-SUAREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Cons. w/No. 19-51132

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO RIVERA-SUAREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CR-504-1

USDC No. 4:19-CR-135-1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 31, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-51125 Document: 00515511706 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/31/2020
No. 19-51125

c/w No. 19-51132

2

Before HAYNES, WILLETT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Francisco Javiar Rivera-Suarez appeals his conviction for illegal reentry 

into the United States and the revocation of his supervised release. He argues

that the sentence enhancement provision of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is 

unconstitutional because Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), held 

that facts that increase a maximum sentence must be proved to a jury beyond 

a reasonable doubt. He concedes that the issue is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he wishes to preserve it for 

further review. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance, agreeing that the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres. 

Alternately, the Government requests an extension of time to file its brief.

In Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 226-27, the Supreme Court held that 

convictions used to enhance a sentence under § 1326(b) need not be recited in 

the indictment. Following Almendarez-Torres, the Apprendi Court held that 

facts used to increase a sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be 

proved to a jury, except for the fact of a prior conviction. See 530 U.S. at 490. 

Apprendi and subsequent Supreme Court cases did not overrule AlmendarezTorres, which remains binding precedent. See United States v. Wallace, 759 

F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 

(5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, Rivera-Suarez’s sole appellate argument is 

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres. Rivera-Suarez has abandoned any challenge 

to the revocation of his supervised release by failing to brief it. See United 

States v. Reagan, 596 F.3d 251, 254-55 (5th Cir. 2010).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 19-51125 Document: 00515511706 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/31/2020
No. 19-51125

c/w No. 19-51132

3

Because the Government’s position “is clearly right as a matter of law so 

that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case,” 

Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the 

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the 

Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED as moot, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-51125 Document: 00515511706 Page: 3 Date Filed: 07/31/2020
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Casper Holstein, Appellant.

(Submitted June 5, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*Samuel Segal*for appellant.

*William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney (Ambrose J. Delehanty*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 17, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 17, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0030. YOLANDA CLAYBROOKS v. JOHN CLAYBROOKS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

20105257
#### § 29.1559 Limitations placard.

There must be a placard in clear view of the pilot that specifies the kinds of operations (VFR, IFR, day, night, or icing) for which the rotorcraft is approved.

[Amdt. 29-24, 49 FR 44440, Nov. 6, 1984]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce E. Brown, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 187]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed (see, *People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Attempted Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Scudder, Callahan and Balio, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,048,531
<SECURITIES>                                 4,938,250
<RECEIVABLES>                                  127,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,830
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,039,022
<PP&E>                                       2,177,335
<DEPRECIATION>                               (863,669)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,943,311
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,570,880
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,578
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,976,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,943,311
<SALES>                                        130,542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,542
<CGS>                                           99,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  230,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,818,407
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             105,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,852,529)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,852,529)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,852,529)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

CASE NO. 17-03283 - LTS

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICE 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Comes now Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company("PRIDCO"), through 

its undersigned counsel and very respectfully states and prays:

1. PRIDCO, a creditor and/or party in interest. requests that all notices and 

documents be forwarded to the undersigned at the following address:

Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company

P.O. Box 362350

San Juan, PR 00936-2350

Attention: Anabelle Centeno, Legal Counsel

Tel. (787) 764-6966 Fax (787) 754-7131

Email: anabelle.centeno@pridco.pr.gov

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that this Court takes notice of the above, and 

that PRIDCO, through the undersigned, be included in the Master Address List.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court using the electronic system which will send notification of such filing 

to the parties which have made an electronic appearance in this case.

San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 5th day of June, 2018.

Puerto Rico Industrial Development 

Company

P.O. Box 362350

San Juan, PR 00936-2350

Tel. (787) 764-6966 Fax (787) 754-7131

Email: anabelle.centeno@pridco.pr.gov 

s/Anabelle Centeno Berríos

Anabelle Centeno Berríos

USDC-PR 221312

IN RE:

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et. al

Debtor(s)

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3257 Filed:06/05/18 Entered:06/05/18 16:56:19 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 17, 2009

0714 

# Order

July 17, 2009

139190 & (32)(33)

THOMAS WELGOSH and MARIE ANNE WELGOSH, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 139190 COA: 290196 Oakland CC: 2002-042140-CH TRI-MOUNT CUSTOM HOMES, INC. and MARK DEMBS, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that th e questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay of arbitration proceedings is

DENIED.
#### § 33.31 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes additional design and construction requirements for reciprocating aircraft engines.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                   CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of Penton Media, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ THOMAS L. KEMP
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Thomas L. Kemp
                                          Chief Executive Officer

                                          /s/ PRESTON L. VICE
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Preston L. Vice
                                          Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 30, 2004
§ 29.901 Installation. ( a ) For the purpose of this part, the powerplant installation includes each part of the rotorcraft (other than the main and auxiliary rotor structures) that— ( 1 ) Is necessary for propulsion;
( 2 ) Affects the control of the major propulsive units; or
( 3 ) Affects the safety of the major propulsive units between normal inspections or overhauls.
( b ) For each powerplant installation— ( 1 ) The installation must comply with— ( i ) The installation instructions provided under § 33.5 of this chapter; and
( ii ) The applicable provisions of this subpart.
( 2 ) Each component of the installation must be constructed, arranged, and installed to ensure its continued safe operation between normal inspections or overhauls for the range of temperature and altitude for which approval is requested.
( 3 ) Accessibility must be provided to allow any inspection and maintenance necessary for continued airworthiness; and
( 4 ) Electrical interconnections must be provided to prevent differences of potential between major components of the installation and the rest of the rotorcraft.
( 5 ) Axial and radial expansion of turbine engines may not affect the safety of the installation.
( 6 ) Design precautions must be taken to minimize the possibility of incorrect assembly of components and equipment essential to safe operation of the rotorcraft, except where operation with the incorrect assembly can be shown to be extremely improbable.
( c ) For each powerplant and auxiliary power unit installation, it must be established that no single failure or malfunction or probable combination of failures will jeopardize the safe operation of the rotorcraft except that the failure of structural elements need not be considered if the probability of any such failure is extremely remote.
( d ) Each auxiliary power unit installation must meet the applicable provisions of this subpart.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424), sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 969, Jan. 26, 1968; Amdt. 29-13, 42 FR 15046, Mar. 17, 1977; Amdt. 29-17, 43 FR 50600, Oct. 30, 1978; Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34215, Sept. 2, 1988; Amdt. 29-36, 60 FR 55776, Nov. 2, 1995]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4428 

To reauthorize the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act of 

1998. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 4, 2020 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Mr. UDALL, Mr. BURR, Mr. SCHATZ, and Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef 

Conservation Act of 1998. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tropical Forest and 

5 Coral Reef Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

7 Section 806(d) of the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef 

8 Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431d(d)) is amend9 ed by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

10 ‘‘(9) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2021. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4428 IS

1 ‘‘(10) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2022. 

2 ‘‘(11) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2023. 

3 ‘‘(12) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2024. 

4 ‘‘(13) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2025.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 294
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 294 appear at 84 FR 15934, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 294.60 Applications for authorization to conduct individual operations or programs not otherwise permitted by this part. ( a ) Where the terms, conditions, or limitations of this part, particularly § 294.81, require prior approval of individual flights or charter programs, the registrant shall apply for such approval by filing three copies of OST Form 4540 with the Office of International Aviation, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division. OST Form 4540 may be obtained from the Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division.
( b ) Action on the application for authorization filed under paragraph (a) of this section will normally be taken within 30 days after the application is filed. The Department will consider requests for faster action that include a full explanation of the need for expedited action.
[ER-1257, 46 FR 52591, Oct. 27, 1981, as amended by Doc. No. 47939, 57 FR 40103, Sept. 2, 1992; 71 FR 49347, Aug. 23, 2006]
#### Robert J. Stewart, Appellant, *v.*Henry N. Ahrens, Respondent.

(Argued November 16,1936;

decided November 18, 1936.)

*Walter H. Merritt*for motion.

*Horace M. Cray*opposed.

Motion denied, without costs.
§ 23.2270 Emergency conditions. ( a ) The airplane, even when damaged in an emergency landing, must protect each occupant against injury that would preclude egress when— ( 1 ) Properly using safety equipment and features provided for in the design;
( 2 ) The occupant experiences ultimate static inertia loads likely to occur in an emergency landing; and
( 3 ) Items of mass, including engines or auxiliary power units (APUs), within or aft of the cabin, that could injure an occupant, experience ultimate static inertia loads likely to occur in an emergency landing.
( b ) The emergency landing conditions specified in paragraph (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, must— ( 1 ) Include dynamic conditions that are likely to occur in an emergency landing; and
( 2 ) Not generate loads experienced by the occupants, which exceed established human injury criteria for human tolerance due to restraint or contact with objects in the airplane.
( c ) The airplane must provide protection for all occupants, accounting for likely flight, ground, and emergency landing conditions.
( d ) Each occupant protection system must perform its intended function and not create a hazard that could cause a secondary injury to an occupant. The occupant protection system must not prevent occupant egress or interfere with the operation of the airplane when not in use.
( e ) Each baggage and cargo compartment must— ( 1 ) Be designed for its maximum weight of contents and for the critical load distributions at the maximum load factors corresponding to the flight and ground load conditions determined under this part;
( 2 ) Have a means to prevent the contents of the compartment from becoming a hazard by impacting occupants or shifting; and
( 3 ) Protect any controls, wiring, lines, equipment, or accessories whose damage or failure would affect safe operations.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3817 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3817

  To observe the lives lost in the United States due to the COVID-19 
                               pandemic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2020

Mr. Schatz (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Coons, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. 
   Durbin, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Bennet, Ms. Smith, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. 
   Kaine, Mr. Blumenthal, Mrs. Shaheen, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Warren, Mr. 
    Tester, Mr. Markey, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Booker, and Mr. Brown) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To observe the lives lost in the United States due to the COVID-19 
                               pandemic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``COVID-19 Pandemic Moment of Silence 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR THE VICTIMS OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.

    The President shall issue a proclamation calling on the people of 
the United States to observe a moment of silence at 12:00 p.m. (local 
time) on Monday, June 1, 2020, as a mark of respect to the memory of 
the more than 100,000 lives lost in the United States due to the COVID-
19 pandemic, as well as their families.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, **

**As      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of      2002**

| (1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                |                         |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                |
|   | By:                                                                       | /s/                DAVID LIU |
|   | David                    LiuChairman                    and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                                                                |