alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.01(b)

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                            INTERACTIVE MAGIC, INC.

         Pursuant to Section 55-10-06 of the North Carolina General Statutes,
corporation hereby submits these Articles of Amendment for the purpose of
amending its Articles of Incorporation:

         1. The name of the corporation is Interactive Magic, Inc.

         2. The following amendments to the Articles of Incorporation of the
corporation was adopted by its shareholders on the 30th day of December 1999 in
the manner prescribed by Chapter 55 of the North Carolina General Statutes:

         The Articles of Incorporation of Interactive Magic, Inc. shall be
amended by deleting the entire text of Article I thereof and substituting in its
place the following:

         "The name of the corporation is iEntertainment Network, Inc."

         3. The amendment was approved by shareholder action, and such
shareholder approval was obtained as required by Chapter 55 of the North
Carolina General Statutes.

         4. These articles will be effective upon filing.

            This the 30th day of December 1999.


                                     INTERACTIVE MAGIC, INC.

                                     By: /s/ Michael Pearce
                                        ------------------------------------
                                     Michael Pearce, Chief Executive Officer
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4138 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to make permanent 

the authority of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to conduct a telework travel expenses program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4138 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telework for U.S. In3 novation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TELEWORK TRAVEL EXPENSES PROGRAM OF THE 

5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK 

6 OFFICE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5711 of title 5, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘test’’; 

10 (2) in subsection (f)— 

11 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

12 (i) in the matter preceding subpara13 graph (A), by striking ‘‘committee’’ and in14 serting ‘‘committees’’; and 

15 (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

16 ‘‘Government’’; 

17 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

18 (i) by striking ‘‘test’’; and 

19 (ii) by striking ‘‘section , including the 

20 provision of reports in accordance with 

21 subsection (d)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub22 section’’; 

23 (C) in paragraph (4)(B), in the matter 

24 preceding clause (i), by inserting ‘‘and main25 tain’’ after ‘‘develop’’; and 

26 (D) in paragraph (5)— 
3 

†S 4138 ES

1 (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

2 ‘‘test’’; and 

3 (ii) by striking subparagraph (B) and 

4 inserting the following: 

5 ‘‘(B) The Director of the Patent and Trademark Of6 fice shall prepare and submit to the appropriate commit7 tees of Congress an annual report on the operation of the 

8 program under this subsection, which shall include— 

9 ‘‘(i) the costs and benefits of the program; and 

10 ‘‘(ii) an analysis of the effectiveness of the pro11 gram, as determined under criteria developed by the 

12 Director.’’; and 

13 (3) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘this section’’ 

14 and inserting ‘‘subsection (b)’’. 

15 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

16 The table of sections for subchapter I of chapter 57 of 

17 title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking the 

18 item relating to section 5711 and inserting the following: 

‘‘5711. Authority for telework travel expenses programs.’’. 

Passed the Senate December 8, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4138 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to make pertravel expenses program. ent and Trademark Office to conduct a telework manent the authority of the United States Pat-
#### PAYNE FIREPROOFING CO. v. GRIMES.

(Decided November 25, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. C. B. Smith.

Robert Thach, for appellant. Howard, Sinnott & Keene, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Dominic D. Miller, Appellant

No. 06-23-00066-CV v.

Angela Smoak, Assistant Criminal District 

Attorney, and Matthew R. Patton, IV, 

Criminal Defense Attorney, Appellees

Appeal from the 115th District Court of 

Marion County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

2300042). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice van Cleef, Chief 

Justice Stevens and Justice Rambin

participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Dominic D. Miller, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 8, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eric J. Pulaski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BindView Development
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ ERIC J. PULASKI
--------------------------------------
Eric J. Pulaski
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.605 Replies. ( a ) The carrier submitting a complaint may file a reply to any or all of the answers to the complaint. The airport owner or operator submitting a request for determination may file a reply to any or all of the answers to the request for determination.
( b ) The reply shall be limited to new matters raised in the answers. It shall constitute the replying party's entire response to the answers. It shall be in the form of a reply brief and may include supporting testimony and exhibits responsive to new matters raised in the answers. In lieu of submitting duplicative exhibits or testimony, the replying party may incorporate by reference testimony and exhibits already filed in the same proceeding.
( c ) The reply shall be filed no later than two (2) calendar days after answers are filed.
( d ) All exhibits and briefs prepared on electronic spreadsheet or word processing programs should be accompanied by standard-format computer diskettes containing those submissions as provided in § 302.603(b).
( e ) The carrier or airport owner or operator submitting the reply must certify that it has served the reply and all supporting testimony and exhibits on the party or parties submitting the answer to which the reply is directed, and that those parties have received or will receive these documents no later than the date the reply is filed, and that any submission on computer diskette is a true copy of the data file used to prepare the printed versions of the exhibits or briefs.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 30047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-943; MM Docket No. 00-72; RM-9853]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Covelo, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed by Round Valley Unified School District, requesting the allotment 
of Channel 245A to Covelo, California, as that community's first local 
aural transmission service. Coordinates used for this proposal are 39-
47-42 NL and 123-14-54 WL.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before June 19, 2000, and reply 
comments on or before July 5, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554.
    In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner, as follows: Round Valley Unified School 
District, Attn: Andrea Harris, Superintendent, Howard & High Streets, 
Covelo, CA 95428.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 00-72, adopted April 19, 
2000, and released April 28, 2000. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 
Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision 
may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, 
International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-11656 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5


<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                               13,931
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        55,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                          47,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    117,848
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      117,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               300,983
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         (189,135)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        117,848
<SALES>                                             137,122
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    137,122
<CGS>                                                53,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    284,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    7,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (208,877)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (210,477)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (210,477)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.05)



</TABLE>
SIERRA 

CLUB 

FOUNDED 18 92 

September 18. 2015 

Scoll Mathias 

Associate Director 

Air Quality Policy Division 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 2771 1 

Re: Air Dispersion Modeling of Louisiana Sulfur Dioxide Pollution 

Dear Associate Director Mathias: 

Air dispersion modeling recentl y conducted by Wingra Engineering, S.C. on 

behalf of the Sierra Club demonstrates that sulfur dioxide ("S02" ) emissions from the 

Dolet Hills Power Station and Big Cajun II Generation Station in Louisiana have each 

caused downwind so2 ambient air concentrations to exceed the 75 parts per billion 

Iational Ambient Air Quality Standard (''NAAQS"), which translates to 196.2 

micrograms per cubic meter ("11g/m3

" ). In particular, using the most recent actual 

emissions data for each facility, the modeli ng shows: 

• Dolet Hills causes concentrations as high as 252.7 11g/m3 

• Big Cajun causes concentrations as high as 254.5 11g/m3 

The modeling also demonstrates that the exceedances in the areas surrounding 

these facilities are even greater when nearby sources of S02 are taken into account. 

Accordingly, the area surrounding Dolct llills and Big Cajun 11 should each be 

designated nonattainment under the AAQS. 

nclosed. please find the results or the modeling analysis, along with the 

corresponding modeling input and output files. 

We urge EPA to consider this information as it undertakes area designations in 

Louisiana for the 20 I 0 revised primary S02 NAAQS. This information is being provided 
Mr. Scott Mathias 

September I 8, 20 15 

Page 2 

to both EPA Region 6 and to appropriate personnel at the Louisiana Department of 

Environmental Quality. 

Thank you for your attention to and consideration of this matter, and please do not 

hesitate to contact me if you would like further in formation. 

Sincerely, 

Is/ Joshua Smith 

Joshua Smith 

Staff Attorney 

Sierra Club 

85 Second St.. Second Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94 1 08 

Phone: (4 15) 977-5560 

Fax: (415) 977-5793 

joshua.smith@sicrraclub.org
#### PUGH v. THE STATE.

(Decided April 20, 1916.)

Appeal from Crenshaw Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. E. Gamble.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 27.1525 Kinds of operations.

The kinds of operations (such as VFR, IFR, day, night, or icing) for which the rotorcraft is approved are established by demonstrated compliance with the applicable certification requirements and by the installed equipment.

[Amdt. 27-21, 49 FR 44435, Nov. 6, 1984]
Exhibit 12.1

                                  Certification

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
                                  States Code)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,  United States Code),  each of
the  undersigned  officers of Fomento  Economico  Mexicano,  S.A. d e C.V.  (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Annual  Report on form 20-F for the year ended  December  31, 2002 (the
"Form 20-F") of the Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information  contained
in the Form 20-F  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the  financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:                  /s/ Jose Antonio Fernandez
                        --------------------------
                        Jose Antonio Fernandez
                        Chief Executive Officer


Dated:                  /s/ Federico Reyes
                        ----------------------
                        Federico Reyes
                        Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Lawyers Mortgage Company, Respondent, *v.*330 West 72nd Street Corporation et al., Defendants, and J. H. Taylor Construction Co., Inc., Appellant.

(Submitted November 16, 1936;

decided November 24, 1936.)

*Leopold K. Simon*for motion.

*Benjamin J. Rabin, Maurice Finkelstein*and *Gerald Blumberg*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary necessary printing disbursements, on the ground the order is not a final order in a special proceeding.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special Committee 172 meeting to be held May 22-25, 2000, starting at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

The agenda will be as follows: May 22: (a.m.) (1) Plenary Convenes at 9:00 a.m.; (2) Introductory Remarks; (3) Review and Approve Agenda; (4) Working Group (WG)-2, VHF Data Radio Signal-in-Space Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards, final work and vote on VDL Mode 3 document; (5) Continue WG-2; (6) Begin WG-3; (7) WG Continues with VHF Digital Radio Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) document progress and furtherance of work. May 24: Plenary Reconvenes: (8) Review Summary Minutes of Previous Meeting; (9) Review Reports from WG-2 and WG-3; (10) Report on ICAO Aeronautical Mobile Communications Panel Working Group Activities; (11) Review EUROCAE WG-47 Report and discuss schedule for further work with WG-3; (12) Review Issues List and Future Work Program; (13) Other Business; (14) Dates and Locations of Next Meeting.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 24, 2000.

Jane P. Caldwell,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 00-10713  Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Contango Oil & Gas Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kenneth R. Peak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 10, 2007



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ KENNETH R. PEAK                                          
|Kenneth R. Peak                                              
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer