alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1




                             CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO SECTION 906
                             OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In  connection  with  the  annual report  of  Meridian  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on  Form  10-QSB/A for  the  period  ending  March 31,  2005 as filed
with   the   Securities   and   Exchange   Commission   on    the   date  hereof
(the "Report"),  we,  Anthony  C. Dike, the  Chief  Executive Officer,  and  Mr.
Foday  Sorsor   Conteh,  Director of  Finance,   of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant   to   18 U.S.C.   1350,  as   adopted   pursuant   to Section   906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section 13(a) or
     15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     A signed  original  of  this  written  statement  required  by Section 906,
or  other  document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise adopting the
signature  that  appears  in  typed  form  within the electronic version of this
written  statement  required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided to Meridian
Holdings,  Inc.,  and  will  be  retained   by   Meridian  Holdings,  Inc.,  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


DATE: June 25, 2005            By:  /s/  Anthony  C.  Dike
                                        -------------------
                                         Anthony  C.  Dike
                                         Chairman  and  CEO


                                 By:  /s/  Foday  Sorsor  Conteh
                                        -------------------
                                         Foday  Sorsor  Conteh
                                          Director of Finance
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITEM 1 OF FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS. FIGURES ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST 100,000 (EXCEPT EPS).
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    128,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               361,500
<PP&E>                                         842,700
<DEPRECIATION>                               (524,100)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 751,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          186,900
<BONDS>                                         81,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     407,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   751,400
<SALES>                                        225,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,000
<CGS>                                          157,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        

</TABLE>
§ 29.605 Fabrication methods. ( a ) The methods of fabrication used must produce consistently sound structures. If a fabrication process (such as gluing, spot welding, or heat-treating) requires close control to reach this objective, the process must be performed according to an approved process specification.
( b ) Each new aircraft fabrication method must be substantiated by a test program.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424), sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150. Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-17, 43 FR 50599, Oct. 30, 1978]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Annual  Report TechLite, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"),
I, J.D. Arvidson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to
my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  April  14,  2004
                                 /s/  J.D.  Arvidson
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 J.D.  Arvidson
                                 Chief  Financial  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-KSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.











                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
180727 ORDER RE AMP LIFT STAY DEADLINES VERSION JULY 27, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et 

al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER GRANTING URGENT MOTION FOR BRIEF EXTENSION OF DEADLINES

The Court has received and reviewed the Urgent Motion for Brief Extension of 

Deadlines (Docket Entry No. 3713 in Case No. 17-3283, the “Extension Motion”). The 

Extension Motion is hereby granted to the extent provided herein. Movant’s reply to any 

oppositions must be filed by August 3, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time).

2

 

 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) 

Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 

BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are 

listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

2 Movant previously filed a Motion for Leave to File Spanish Document and Requesting 

Short Extension of Time to Submit Certified Translation (Docket Entry No. 3020 in Case 

No. 17-3283). This prior request for an extension of time to file certified translations was 

deemed to be consent to an extension of the period referenced in 11 U.S.C. § 362(e)(1) 

pending the Court’s determination of the Lift Stay Motion in the Order Setting Briefing 

Schedule in Connection with AMP Lift Stay Motion and Granting Motion for Leave to 

File Spanish Document and Requesting Extension of Time to Submit Certified 

Translation (Docket Entry No. 3023 in Case No. 17-3283). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3716 Filed:07/27/18 Entered:07/27/18 16:15:22 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
180727 ORDER RE AMP LIFT STAY DEADLINES VERSION JULY 27, 2018 2

This order resolves Docket Entry No. 3713 in Case No. 17-3283.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3716 Filed:07/27/18 Entered:07/27/18 16:15:22 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40015

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ELOY GUADALUPE RUBALCAVA-SEGURA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:12-CR-379-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eloy Guadalupe

Rubalcava-Segura has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.

Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rubalcava-Segura has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents

no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 13-40015 Document: 00512420305 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
No. 13-40015

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40015 Document: 00512420305 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11559]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 9, 2000 / Notices

[[Page 26809]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service


Meeting of Advisory Committee on Emerging Markets

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given that 
the third meeting of the Advisory Committee on Emerging Markets will be 
held May 17, 2000. The role of the committee is to provide information 
and advice, based upon knowledge and expertise of the members, useful 
to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in implementing the 
Emerging Markets Program. The committee will also advise USDA on ways 
to increase the involvement of the U.S. private sector in cooperative 
work with emerging markets in food and rural business systems and 
review proposals submitted to the Program.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, May 17, 2000, from 9:30 a.m. 
to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is to review and 
discuss those proposals the Emerging Markets Office has received which 
may qualify for Emerging Markets Program funding. The minutes of the 
meeting announced in this Notice shall be available for review. The 
meeting is open to the public and members of the public may provide 
comments in writing to Douglas Freeman, Foreign Agricultural Service, 
Room 6506 South Building, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 14th and 
Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20250, but should not make any 
oral comments at the meeting unless invited to do so by the Co-
chairpersons.

    Signed at Washington, DC, May 3, 2000.
Timothy J. Galvin,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 00-11559 Filed 5-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-M
Docket Management Facility US Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor RoomWl2-140 Washington, DC 20590


### Subject: Extension ofexemption 10234
To Whom it May Concern 

## Acadian Seaplanes 

## LLC 2640Main Street PO Box 987, Rangeley, Maine 04970 (207)864-5307 www.AcadianSeaplanes.com

Acadian SeaplanesLLC is seeking an extension ofexemption 10234 from 14 CFR (FAR Section) Part: 120.225(b); 120.117(b). Our business has not changed and we would like to continue to cover our safety sensitive employees under one drug testing program, subject to our current conditions and limitations. The docket number for this exemption is FAA-2011-0268. I had sent an electronic request dated 1/16/2013 but have not heard back. Sincerely

# ,k:J~**/)J;,t~/;v?vl~** Keith Deschambeault
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-41142

Conference Calendar

 

CLAUDE E. JOINER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; WAYNE SCOTT,

DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; UNIDENTIFIED

DISHONG, Warden, Hodge Unit,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-707

--------------------

October 18, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Claude E. Joiner (“Joiner”), Texas prisoner # 594355,

appeals the district court’s decision to dismiss his claim that

he was denied his First Amendment right to exercise his religion

because he was not allowed to possess a cassette player and tapes

in his cell.
No. 98-41142

-2-

We have reviewed the briefs and the record. We conclude

that Joiner has failed to demonstrate that the district court

plainly erred in concluding that preventing him from possessing a

cassette player and tapes was reasonably related to the prison’s

security concerns. See Scott v. Mississippi Dep’t of

Corrections, 961 F.2d 77, 80-82 (5th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED.
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Element 21 Golf Company (formerly BRL
Holdings, Inc.) (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, we, Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer, and
Jim Morin, Secretary/Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and
belief:
  (1) The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.
  
 Date: May
20, 2005
 By:  /s/
Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D.
 President
and Director
  Date: May
20, 2005
 By:  /s/
Jim Morin
 Secretary/Treasurer, CFO and
Director
   -17-
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF EDWARD J. BOREY PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Edward J. Borey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 30, 2005



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    EDWARD J. BOREY                               
|Edward J. Borey President and Chief Executive Officer
633 A.2d 92

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Stephen P. BOUREXIS.

Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 47,

September Term, 1993.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Nov. 19, 1993.

*ORDER*

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent to suspend the Respondent by consent. Upon consideration of said Petition, it is this 19th day of November, 1993,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Stephen Peter Bourexis, be and he is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of six months, effective 8:00 p.m., Friday, December 10, 1993. It is further,

ORDERED, that the Respondent shall pay to the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland $2,583.50, the cost of the investigation of this matter, on a schedule to be determined by agreement of the parties. Agreement to said schedule shall not be unreasonably withheld; and

It is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Stephen P. Bourexis from the register of attorneys in this Court until further Order of this Court and certify that fact to the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Rule BV13.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6664
TYRONE D. ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-684) Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997 Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Tyrone D. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (1994). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order * denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Angelone , No. CA-96-684 (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION

I, Ivo Heiden, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Zaxis International Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2009

/s/ Ivo HeidenCEO, CFO and Chairman