alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HOST
MARRIOTT L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             277
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       72
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           8,329
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          2,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,196
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,376
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    16
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    240
<INCOME-TAX>                                        16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                256
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     29
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       285
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93


</TABLE>
#### CHOCTAW AND CHICKASAW NATIONS v. UNITED STATES

[81 C. Cls. 63; 296 U. S. 644]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court November 25, 1935.
#### MONTGOMERY v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 30, 1916.)

Appeal from Clay County Court.

Heard before Hon. E. J. Garrison.

No counsel marked for_ appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed on motion of Attorney General.
SCOT-22-0000502

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

________________________________________________________________

LAULANI TEALE, individual, Appellant,

vs.

BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, State of Hawaiʻi,

and the UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI, State of Hawaiʻi, Appellees.

________________________________________________________________

APPEAL FROM THE BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon review of Appellant’s appeal from Appellee Board 

of Land and Natural Resources’ (BLNR’s) approval of the “Mauna 

Kea Comprehensive Management Plan 2022 Supplement” (2022 

Supplement) under “Item K-2 of its agenda” at the July 22, 2022 

“hearing,” and (2) the “implicit denial” of Appellant’s request 

for a contested case hearing, and the record, it appears this 

court lacks appellate jurisdiction over the appeal.

Based on this record, what occurred before the BLNR on

July 22, 2022, in relation to the 2022 Supplement, did not 

result from a contested case or the denial of a contested case 

request because the discussion on July 22, 2022, did not prevent 

Appellant from filing a petition for a contested case hearing.

Appellant filed a petition and that petition remains pending in 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCOT-22-0000502

15-FEB-2023

07:51 AM

Dkt. 80 ODSLJ
2

the BLNR. What occurred on July 22, 2022, was thus not a 

proceeding that determined Appellant’s legal rights, duties, or 

privileges. See Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes (HRS) § 91-1 (Supp. 

2021) (defining a “contested case” as “a proceeding in which the 

legal rights, duties, or privileges of specific parties are 

required by law to be determined after an opportunity for agency 

hearing”). Because what occurred on July 22, 2022, in relation 

to the 2022 Supplement was not a contested case, or a denial of 

a request for a contested case, this court does not have 

jurisdiction over this direct appeal under HRS §§ 183C-9 (Supp. 

2021) and 91-14(a) (2012 & Supp. 2021).1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for 

lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 15, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

1 HRS § 91-7 (2012 & Supp. 2021) does not authorize a direct appeal 

to this court, or for a declaratory judgment action to originate in this 

court. See Lingle v. Hawaii Gov’t Employees Ass’n, AFSCME, Local 152, AFLCIO, 107 Hawaiʻi 178, 184, 111 P.3d 587, 593 (2005) (“The right to appeal is 

purely statutory and exists only when jurisdiction is given by some 

constitutional or statutory provision.”).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000             JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                          22,577                  34,220
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,566                  95,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,124)                 (3,780)
<INVENTORY>                                    749,447                 726,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               887,734                 862,668
<PP&E>                                         549,123                 441,744
<DEPRECIATION>                               (147,621)                (98,349)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,344,878               1,261,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          531,422                 551,835
<BONDS>                                        200,000                 200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            54                      54
<OTHER-SE>                                     202,474                 220,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,344,878               1,261,516
<SALES>                                      2,206,945               1,220,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,206,945               1,220,759
<CGS>                                        1,404,113                 766,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,404,113                 766,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               782,669                 422,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,098                   1,193
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,844                  29,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,193)                   3,499
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,628)                   1,887
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,565)                   1,612
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,565)                   1,612
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0000798954
<NAME>                         Enex Oil & Gas Income Program II - 9, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         11595
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20724
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               33333
<PP&E>                                         1512249
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1147977
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 397605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          98916
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     298689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   397605
<SALES>                                        146336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               146336
<CGS>                                          78058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  98441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               20383
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   47895
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.25

                               FIFTH AMENDMENT TO
                       CONVERTIBLE SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

      THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (the "Fifth
Amendment") is made and entered into as of November 14, 2005, by and among
NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Maker") and_______
(the "Holder"). This Fifth Amendment amends the Note (as defined below).

                                    RECITALS

A. Section 10 of that certain Convertible Secured Promissory Note, dated as of
November 12, 2003 and amended on April 26, 2004, April 12, 2005, June 16, 2005
and July 26, 2005, by and between the Maker and the Holder (as so amended the
"Note"), states that any provision of such note may be amended or waived in
writing by the Holder and the Maker; and

B. The Maker and the Holder wish to amend the Note as provided below.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows:

      "1. Maturity Date. The aggregate principal amount of this Note and accrued
interest thereon shall be due and payable on January 31, 2006 (such date, the
"Maturity Date")."

2. All other terms and conditions of the Note shall be unaffected hereby and
remain in full force and effect

3. This Fifth Amendment shall be shall be governed by and construed under the
laws of the State of Washington as applied to agreements among Washington
residents entered into and to be performed entirely within the State of
Washington.

4. This Fifth Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of
which will be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one
and the same agreement.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

                                        1
<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this FIFTH AMENDMENT
TO CONVERTIBLE SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE as of the date first above written.

MAKER:

NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

By:________________________
Name:______________________
Title:_____________________

HOLDER:

___________________________
Name:

259046 v2/RE

                                        2
#### ESTATE of Sumner GERARD et al., Appellants. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.

No. 890, Docket 74-2005.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued March 27, 1975.

Decided April 9, 1975.

Robert D. Whoriskey, New York City (Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, John P. Campbell, Alan S. Berlin, New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Gary R. Allen, Washington, D. C. (Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Wynette J. Hewett, Attys., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C.), for appellee.

*1233Before MULLIGAN and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges, and THOMSEN, District Judge.*

*

 Of the United States District Court, District of Maryland, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the Tax Court finding a deficiency in the estate tax of the Estate of Sumner Gerard. That portion of the deficiency in issue on this appeal (approximately $482,000) is based on the determination that the decedent, Sumner Gerard, gave certain property as a gift in contemplation of death within the meaning of Section 2035 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. We affirm on the opinion of Judge Quealy of the Tax Court reported at 57 T.C. 749 (1972).
#### § 29.661 Rotor blade clearance.

There must be enough clearance between the rotor blades and other parts of the structure to prevent the blades from striking any part of the structure during any operating condition.

[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968]
Exhibit 32.2

# Written Statement of
the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of The RiceX Company (the Company), hereby certify, based on
my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Todd C. Crow Todd C. CrowMarch 30,
2005
#### § 135.219 IFR: Destination airport weather minimums.

No person may take off an aircraft under IFR or begin an IFR or over-the-top operation unless the latest weather reports or forecasts, or any combination of them, indicate that weather conditions at the estimated time of arrival at the next airport of intended landing will be at or above authorized IFR landing minimums.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

             INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
InkSure Technologies Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 333-130168) of our report dated March
19, 2009 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph regarding going concern uncertainty), appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of InkSure Technologies Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2008.

/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.
---------------------------
Brightman Almagor & Co.
Certified Public Accountants,
A member firm of  Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Tel Aviv, Israel
March 30, 2009
```
#### § 303.06 Review of antitrust immunity.

The Assistant Secretary may initiate a proceeding to review any antitrust immunity previously conferred by the Department's predecessor or the Department in any section 41309 transaction. The Assistant Secretary may terminate or modify such immunity if the Assistant Secretary finds after notice and hearing that the previously conferred immunity is not consistent with the provisions of section 41308. In any proceeding to review such immunity, the proponents of the immunity shall have the burden of justifying the continuation of previously conferred immunity under the provisions of section 41308.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15937, Apr. 16, 2019]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-31 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc:

Appendix Summons Jose R. Gonzalez Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-31 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc:

Appendix Summons Jose R. Gonzalez Page 2 of 2
#### Mitchell *v.*The State.

Crime.

(Decided May 30, 1916.

71 South. 982.)

1. Appeal and Error; Review; Instructions. — In the absence of a bill of exceptions containing data of the trial, together with the given charges, and the oral charge of the court, and such charges are not set out as part of the record as now provided by Acts 1915, p. 815, the appellate courts cannot review intelligently charges requested by and refused to defendant.

2. Charge of Court; Abstract. — Charges not predicated on hypotheses raised by the evidence, or an hypothesis not raised by the evidence, are properly refused as abstract.

3. 'Appeal and Error; Showing Error. — A defendant who appeals must not only show error, but also that he was probably injuriously affected thereby, under rule 45, Supreme Court Practice.

*105Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. T. P. Heflin.

Sis Mitchell, alias, was convicted of crime, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

PELHAM, P. J.

(1, 2) The record in this case contains no bill of exceptions. The transcript shows a certificate'signed by the trial judge, stating that the time for tendering a bill of exceptions had expired and no bill had been tendered. The record contains the written charges given and refused that were requested by the defendant, but the general oral charge of the court is not.set out, as provided by the act approved September 25, 1915 (Acts 1915, p. 815), and the record not setting out the oral charge of the court and containing no bill of exceptions *(Choate v. A. G. S. R. R. Co., 170*Ala. 590, 54 South. 507; *Ala. Construction Co. v. Wagnon Bros.,*137 Ala. 338, 34 South. 352), the court is without the data upon which to intelligently review the charges. For aught we know, the charges set out do not relate to issues on which the case was tried, and if predicated on an hypothesis not raised by the evidence, were properly refused as abstract. — Supreme Court rule 45 (175 Ala. XII, 61 South, ix) makes it incumbent upon an appellant to not only show error, but also that he was probably injured *thereby.*—Henderson *v. Tenn. C., I. & Ry. Co.,*190 Ala. 126, 67 South. 414.

The record proper shows an indictment in regular form, charging the defendant with assault with intent to murder. The judgment entry is also regular, and shows a judgment of conviction in conformity with the finding of the verdict, finding the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment. An examination of the record shows the proceedings to be regular, and nothing authorizing a reversal, and an affirmance is therefore ordered.

Affirmed.'
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Lawrence  A.  Consalvi,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Gateway  International
Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004,  fully complies with
the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information  contained in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter  ended  December 31, 2004,  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Gateway International Holdings, Inc.


By: /s/ Lawrence A. Consalvi
     -----------------------------
Name:  Lawrence A. Consalvi
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date:  July 27, 2005


                                       56
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP91-229-028]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2000, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets as listed in 
Appendix A attached to the filing, to be effective June 1, 2000.
    Panhandle states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
Ordering Paragraph (A) of the Commission's Order Accepting Settlement 
and Authorizing Abandonment (Order) issued on August 28, 1992 in Docket 
No. RP91-229-000, et al., 60 FERC para. 61,212 (1992).
    Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers, applicable state regulatory agencies and parties to 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online 
rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11613 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M