alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### E. E. JACKSON LUMBER CO. v. MOORE.

(Decided February 10, 1916.)

Appeal from Chilton Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. PEARSON.

Pettus, Fuller & Lapsley, for appellant. Middleton, Den-son & Reynolds, for appellee.

Brown, J.

Affirmed for want of assignment of errors.
Order entered October 24, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-17-00851-CV FRANK A. RICHARDS, Appellant

V. TOM'S AUTO TRANSPORT, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-06468



### ORDER Before the Court is appellee’s October 11, 2017 motion to dismi ss appeal for want of prosecution. Because the deadline for filing appellant’s brief has not been triggered, we DENY

the motion. We note that on August 22, 2017, we directed appellant to file, within ten days, written verification he had requested the reporter’s record and either paid the reporter’s fee or was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned app ellant that failure to comply could result in the appeal being submitted without the reporter ’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c). To date, however, appellant has not complied. Accord ingly, we ORDER the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See id.As the clerk’s record has been filed, we ORDER appellant to file his brief no later than November 22, 2017.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 4, 2019

t0128 

# Order

Clerk February 4, 2019

156987 (24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156987

COA: 338479

Kent CC: 99

- 006332

- FC

SAMUEL OZELL POWELL

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 2,

2018 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
#### § 31.23 Flight load factor.

In determining limit load, the limit flight load factor must be at least 1.4.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 127]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 286]]

Public Law 114-127
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To allow the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to lease or transfer certain 
              lands. <<NOTE: Feb. 29, 2016 -  [H.R. 487]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED TO VALIDATE LAND TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, without 
further approval, ratification, or authorization by the United States, 
the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma may lease, sell, convey, warrant, or 
otherwise transfer all or any part of its interests in any real property 
that is not held in trust by the United States for the benefit of such 
tribe.
    (b) Trust Land Not Affected.--Nothing in this section shall--
            (1) authorize the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to lease, sell, 
        convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any part of an 
        interest in any real property that is held in trust by the 
        United States for the benefit of such tribe; or
            (2) affect the operation of any law governing leasing, 
        selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise transferring any 
        interest in such trust land.

    Approved February 29, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 487:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114-250 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 114-205 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 161 (2015):
                                    Sept. 16, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 162 (2016):
                                    Feb. 11, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 29.51 Takeoff data: general. ( a ) The takeoff data required by §§ 29.53, 29.55, 29.59, 29.60, 29.61, 29.62, 29.63, and 29.67 must be determined— ( 1 ) At each weight, altitude, and temperature selected by the applicant; and
( 2 ) With the operating engines within approved operating limitations.
( b ) Takeoff data must— ( 1 ) Be determined on a smooth, dry, hard surface; and
( 2 ) Be corrected to assume a level takeoff surface.
( c ) No takeoff made to determine the data required by this section may require exceptional piloting skill or alertness, or exceptionally favorable conditions.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-39, 61 FR 21899, May 10, 1996]
§ 171.159 Installation requirements. ( a ) The facility must be installed according to accepted good engineering practices, applicable electric and safety codes, and Federal Communications Commission requirements.
( b ) The facility must have a reliable source of suitable primary power, either from a power distribution system or locally generated, with a supplemental standby system, if needed.
( c ) Dual transmitting equipment with automatic changeover is preferred and may be required to support certain IFR procedures.
( d ) There must be a means for determining from the ground, the performance of the equipment, initially and periodically.
( e ) A facility intended for use as an instrument approach aid for an airport must have or be supplemented by the following ground air or landline communications services: ( 1 ) At facilities outside of and not immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, there must be ground-air communications from the airport served by the facility. Separate communications channels are acceptable.
( 2 ) At facilities within or immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, there must be the ground-air communications required by paragraph (e)(1) of this section and reliable communications (at least a landline telephone) from the airport to the nearest Federal Aviation Administration air traffic control or communications facility. Separate communications channels are acceptable.
Compliance with paragraphs (e) (1) and (2) of this section need not be shown at airports where an adjacent Federal Aviation Administration facility can communicate with aircraft on the ground at the airport and during the entire proposed instrument approach procedure. In addition, at low traffic density airports within or immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, and where extensive delays are not a factor, the requirements of paragraphs (e) (1) and (2) of this section may be reduced to reliable communications (at least a landline telephone) from the airport to the nearest Federal Aviation Administration air traffic control or communications facility, if an adjacent Federal Aviation Administration facility can communicate with aircraft during the proposed instrument approach procedure, at least down to the minimum en route altitude for the controlled airspace area. [Doc. No. 10116, 35 FR 12715, Aug. 11, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 171-16, 56 FR 65665, Dec. 17, 1991]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certificatepursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to

Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of GB&TBancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Gregory L. Hamby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to thebest of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|            | /s/  Gregory L. Hamby                      |   |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|            | Gregory  L. Hamby, Chief Financial Officer |
|            |                                       |
|            |                                       |
| March  16, 2006 |                                       |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to GB&T Bancshares, Inc. and will beretained by GB&T and furnished to the SEC or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2767 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 12:17:36 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jonathan K. Hsu, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



March 1,
2004

| |  | /s/JONATHAN K. HSU Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EC00-78-000]

Take notice that on April 27, 2000, Merchant Energy Group of the Americas, Inc., Gener S.A., and TransAlta USA Inc. (Applicants) tendered for filing Exhibit H, the Stock Purchase Agreement (SPA), to accompany the joint application under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act filed by the Applicants on April 13, 2000. Pursuant to 18 CFR 388.112, Applicants request confidential treatment of the SPA.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before May 15, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11366  Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     2
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      67
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               14
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                          50
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        67
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    31
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (31)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (31)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
#### John J. Sullivan, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Brooklyn National Bank of New York, Appellant.

(Argued October 13, 1936;

decided November 17, 1936.)

*606
      *Meyer Kraushaar*for appellant.

*David O. Kuh*and *Morrison P. Paley*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Finch, JJ.; Crane, Ch. J., and Crouch, J., taking no part.
#### § 375.36 Lease of foreign civil aircraft without crew.

Foreign civil aircraft that are leased without crew to an air carrier or citizen or permanent resident of the United States, and used by the lessee in otherwise authorized air transportation or commercial air operations, may be operated into, out of, and within the United States in accordance with any applicable regulations prescribed by the Federal Aviation Administration.
#### § 325.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish procedures to be followed in designating eligible places and in determining essential air transportation levels for eligible places, and in the appeals and periodic reviews of these determinations, under 49 U.S.C. 41732.

[Docket No. 82, 50 FR 2434, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15938, Apr. 16, 2019]
#### HURT v. THE STATE.

(Decided April 15, 1915.)

Appeal from Russeell Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. M. Sollie.

*684No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,466, TA-W-37,466A]


Rochester Button Company; South Boston, VA; Kenbridge VA; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on April 13, 2000, applicable to 
workers of Rochester Button Company, South Boston, Virginia. The notice 
will be published soon in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Information received by 
the company shows that worker separations occurred at the Kenbridge, 
Virginia location of Rochester Button Company. The workers are engaged 
in the production of polyester buttons.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Rochester Button Company who were adversely affected by 
increased imports.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover 
the workers of Rochester Button Company, Kenbridge, Virginia.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,466 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Rochester Button Company, South Boston, Virginia 
(TA-W-37,466), and Kenbridge, Virginia (TA-W-37,466A), who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 1, 
1999, through April 13, 2002 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.


    Signed at Washington D.C. this 27th day of April, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-11114 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### § 257.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to ensure that ticket agents doing business in the United States, air carriers, and foreign air carriers tell consumers clearly when the air transportation they are buying or considering buying involves a code-sharing arrangement or a long-term wet lease, and that they disclose to consumers the transporting carrier's identity.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I,
Larry L. Richards, Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                     /s/ Larry L. Richards
                                     _________________________________________
                                     Larry L. Richards
                                     Controller (Principal Financial and
                                     Accounting Officer)
                                     November 13, 2003

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
        been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
        forwarded to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3034

_____________________________

DAMON P. JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

James Daniel, Judge.

May 15, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Damon P. Johnson, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, David O. Cole, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the periodic report, to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC upon request.







|                       |     |                        
|---------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|Date:  October 3, 2008 | By: | /s/ DAVID O. COLE      
|                       |     | David O. Cole          
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer
§ 323.13 DOT actions. ( a ) If an objection has been filed under this part, DOT will dispose of the objection by order.
( b ) If no objection has been filed within the time allowed by § 323.10(a), DOT may: ( 1 ) By order prohibit a termination, suspension, or reduction that reasonably appears to deprive any eligible place of essential air transportation;
( 2 ) Issue a notice or a final order that it will take no action on a notice filed under § 323.3; or
( 3 ) Take no action.
[Doc. No. 82, 50 FR 2430, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended by Doc. No. OST-96-1269, 61 FR 19166, May 1, 1996]
§ 34.9 Exceptions. ( a ) *Spare engines.* Certain engines that meet the following description are excepted: ( 1 ) This exception allows production of an engine for installation on an in-service aircraft. A spare engine may not be installed on a new aircraft.
( 2 ) Each spare engine must be identical to a sub-model previously certificated to meet all applicable requirements.
( 3 ) A spare engine may be used only when the emissions of the spare do not exceed the certification requirements of the original engine, for all regulated pollutants.
( 4 ) No separate approval is required to produce spare engines.
( 5 ) The record for each engine excepted under this paragraph (c) must indicate that the engine was produced as an excepted spare engine.
( 6 ) Engines produced under this exception must be labeled “EXCEPTED SPARE” in accordance with § 45.13 of this chapter.
( b ) On and after July 18, 2012, and before August 31, 2013, a manufacturer may produce up to six Tier 4 compliant engines that meet the NOX standards of paragraph (d)(1)(vi) of this section rather than § 34.23(a)(2). No separate approval is required to produce these engines. Engines produced under this exception are to be labeled “COMPLY” in accordance with § 45.13 of this chapter.
[Doc. No. FAA-2012-1333, 77 FR 76850, Dec. 31, 2012]
§ 27.483 One-wheel landing conditions. For the one-wheel landing condition, the rotorcraft is assumed to be in the level attitude and to contact the ground on one aft wheel. In this attitude— ( a ) The vertical load must be the same as that obtained on that side under § 27.479(b)(1); and
( b ) The unbalanced external loads must be reacted by rotorcraft inertia.