alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CORNELIUS WILLIAMS v. BOSTON INSURANCE COMPANY.1

December 29, 1916.

Nos. 20,070—(87).

Fire insurance —• vacancy permit —complaint bad.

Action against insurer for damages because insured was required to pay for vacancy permit attached to fire insurance policy. Demurrer to complaint sustained. [Reporter.]

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $4,000. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the amended complaint, Michael, X, plaintiff appealed.

Affirmed

*Cornelius Williams, pro se.*

*Watson & AbernetJiy,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 160 N. W. 664.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint.

It appears from the complaint that defendant issued a fire insurance policy, of the Minnesota standard form, insuring a dwelling house in the city of St. Paul belonging to plaintiff for a period of three years, for which plaintiff paid the prescribed premium of $24, and that subsequently plaintiff paid a further sum for a vacancy permit, which payment was at the rate of $32 per year. Plaintiff claims that he was coerced into making this additional payment by fear that the policy would become void or be canceled, and that the charge was extortionate and a breach of the contract evidenced by the policy. We infer from the complaint that the rate to be charged for vacancy permits had been fixed and prescribed by a rating board organized and acting under chapter 101, p. 133, Laws of 1915, and that defendant refused to issue the vacancy permit, unless plaintiff paid the rate so prescribed. Plaintiff *484asserts that his contract of insurance cannot he impaired by this statute, because his policy was issued before the statute was enacted, and seems to think that defendant violated the terms of the contract by refusing to issue the vacancy permit without payment therefor. But the policy provides that it shall be void if the premises become vacant and remain vacant for more than 30 days without the assent of defendant. It contains no provision requiring defendant to consent that the premises may remain vacant, or to issue a permit therefor, and no provision prescribing the terms upon which such permit may be procured. Refusing to issue the permit without an additional payment infringed no contract right of plaintiff. It was plaintiff who sought to change the contract, not the company. The company-offered to make the change desired by plaintiff on the condition that he pay the additional premium, and he could not secure the benefit of the change without making sucl^ payment. If he saw fit to make the payment and secure the change, he has no ground for complaint. If he had not done so, the terms of the policy would have remained as fixed by the original contract.

Order affirmed.
#### § 25.1729 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness: EWIS.

The applicant must prepare Instructions for Continued Airworthiness applicable to EWIS in accordance with Appendix H sections H25.4 and H25.5 to this part that are approved by the FAA.
#### THOMPSON v. THE STATE.

(Decided January 21st, 1915.)

Appeal from Houston Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

E. H. Hill, for appellant. Robert C. Brickbll, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
# Aero Flight Checklist Preflight

LED

Inactive 

# Safety Button Active, press and hold button to deactivate Initializing, please wait

System error, see troubleshooting guide Autopilot ready, no GPS Loss of RC signal, automatic return to launch Autopilot ready, GPS locked Armed, ready to fly 

# 4 Press and hold safety button until solid red. 

# 3 Check LED for blinking blue (no GPS) or blinking green (GPS locked).

GPS GPS 

# X

Check manual controls. 

# 5
» Throttle

» Pitch up and down » Roll left and right » Yaw left and right 

# 6 Check autopilot stabilization. » Pitch up and down » Roll left and right » Wings and tail attached » Tail boom secured » Servos and rods secured » Airspeed sensor secured » Propeller tight » Transmitter on 

# 1 Go outside to an open area, and inspect aircraft. Connect charged battery. 

# 2
» Hold aircraft still while powering on. » Secure lid. » Check for balanced

center of gravity.motor on
motor o f 

# Flight Control

For customer support, contact us at help@3DR.com or call our support line at +1 (858) 225-1414 Monday through Friday, from 8 am to 5 pm, PST. 3DR.com/rtf-aero | plane.ardupilot.com 

# Postflight 

# 1 Press and hold safety button until blinking red. 

# 2 Disconnect battery. 

# 3 Power off transmitter.

V.B DCT0034 ©2014 3D Robotics. All rights reserved. 

# Flight Modes RC mode 2 only Left StickLeft Stick Left StickLeft Stick

Left StickLeft Stick Left StickLeft Stick Left Stick Left Stick

Left Stick Left Stick

Left Stick

Left Stick Left Stick

Left Stick pitch down pitch up yaw left yaw right
roll left roll right

With GEAR/MIX set to MIX , set FLAP/GYRO to: 0 for AUTONOMOUS 1 for FLY BY WIRE 2 for RETURN TO LAUNCH With GEAR/MIX set to GEAR , set FLAP/GYRO to: 0 for MANUAL 1 for STABILIZE 2 for LOITER 

### Spektrum FlySky With AIL D/R set to 0 , set F MODE to: N for RETURN TO LAUNCH 1 for FLY BY WIRE 2 for AUTONOMOUS With AIL D/R set to 1 , set F MODE to: N for LOITER 1 for STABILIZE 2 for MANUAL
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Cosine Communications, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry
      Gibson, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






/s/
      Terry
      R. Gibson





Terry
      R.
      Gibson


Director,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


March
      23,
      2007
#### BAILEY v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 18, 1916.)

Appeal from Walker Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. T. L. Sowell.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Brown, J.

Dismissed on authority of *Stephens v. State,*72 South. 268.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon
Holdings Corporation (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (a) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (a) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Ronald E. Klingle  
|Ronald E. Klingle      
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 11, 2011
Exhibit G

Summary of Segal Consulting Hours Worked and Fees Incurred

Matter Total Hours Billed Total Fees

001 Actuarial Analysis                                         340.60 $         142,671.00

002 Research                                            17.80 $              9,961.00

003 Data Analysis                                              2.80 $              1,660.00

004 Calls & Meetings with Other

Professionals                                             64.70 $            34,917.00

005 Preparation of Reports                                            16.30 $              5,379.00

006 Retirement Committee Meetings                                            17.10 $              9,167.00

018 Case Administration                                            89.60 $            55,479.00

Non‐Working Travel Time                                            38.60 $            18,164.00

Subtotal                                         587.50 $         277,398.00

Less 50% Discount on Non‐working Travel

Matter

$            (9,082.00)

Total $         268,316.00

Case Name: In re Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al.

Case Number:   17 BK 3283‐LTS

Applicant's Name:   Segal Consulting

Date of Application:   July 16, 2018

Interim or Final:   Interim

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3537-7 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 15:58:50 Desc:

Exhibit G Page 1 of 1
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
  PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SEC. 1350 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

Each of the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 29, 2010   /s/ Tal Gilat
                       ----------------------
                       Tal Gilat, Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 29, 2010   /s/ David (Dadi) Avner
                       ----------------------
                       David (Dadi) Avner, Chief Financial Officer
```
**Exhibit31**

 

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Dr. Gil Hegemier, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of Composite Solutions, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4. I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presented in this annual report myconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the designor operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. I have indicated in this annual reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in otherfactors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to thedate of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regardto significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: January 13, 2004 | /s/ Dr. Gilbert A. Hegemier       |   |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Dr. Gilbert A. Hegemier, Chairman |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     UT
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Statement of Income, Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                             1000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               4,240,012
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>               391,731
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,157,953
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                  940,995
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          6,730,691
<COMMON>                                    1,338
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>               2,249,091
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                       464,596
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>          2,715,025
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     363,000
<PREFERRED>                                84,339
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                    1,682,702
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                 208,300
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>          1,677,325
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>           6,730,691
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>               2,954,613
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                      136,362
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              2,472,444
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              2,608,806
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                   345,807
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                         37,496
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>            383,303
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  124,692
<NET-INCOME>                              258,611
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                34,752
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>             223,859
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  246,251
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                 109,053
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                    589,005
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                1.62



</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4274 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to exclude discounts for covered 

part D drugs from the anti-kickback prohibition, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2020 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to exclude 

discounts for covered part D drugs from the anti-kickback prohibition, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Legalizing Drug Dis5 counts for Seniors Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4274 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF DISCOUNTS FOR COVERED PART D 

2 DRUGS FROM THE ANTI-KICKBACK PROHIBI3 TION. 

4 (a) EXCLUSION OF DISCOUNTS.—Section 

5 1128B(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a– 

6 7b(b)(3)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (J)— 

8 (A) by moving such subparagraph 2 ems to 

9 the left; and 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

11 (2) in subparagraph (K)— 

12 (A) by moving such subparagraph 2 ems to 

13 the left; and 

14 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

15 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

16 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub17 paragraph: 

18 ‘‘(L) a discount, including through a rebate, 

19 discount card, or coupon, with respect to a covered 

20 part D drug (as defined in section 1860D–2(e)) 

21 under part D of title XVIII if— 

22 ‘‘(i) the full value of such discount is pro23 vided initially to a part D eligible individual (as 

24 defined in section 1860D–1(a)(3)(A)) enrolled 

25 in a part D plan (as defined in section 1860D– 

26 23(a)(5)), and the discount is not structured 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4274 IS

1 for the specific purpose of providing a price 

2 concession, other than a bona fide service fee, 

3 to another individual or entity; and 

4 ‘‘(ii) in the case where such discount in5 cludes a reduction in price applicable to individ6 uals enrolled in a health plan but not to individ7 uals enrolled in a prescription drug plan under 

8 such part D or a MA–PD plan under part C of 

9 such title XVIII, such discount is not struc10 tured for the specific purpose of increasing uti11 lization of such covered part D drug under such 

12 a prescription drug plan or MA–PD plan.’’. 

13 (b) APPLICATION OF THE PROTECTION AGAINST

14 OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENDITURES.—Section 1860D– 

15 2(b)(4)(C)(iii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

16 1395w–102(b)(4)(C)(iii)) is amended— 

17 (1) in subclause (III), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

18 end; 

19 (2) in subclause (IV), by striking the period at 

20 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

21 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

22 ‘‘(V) under an arrangement de23 scribed in section 1128B(b)(3)(L).’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 4274 IS

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect on January 1, 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 147.17 Training requirements. ( a ) Each certificated aviation maintenance technician school must: ( 1 ) Establish, maintain, and utilize a curriculum that is designed to continually align with the mechanic airman certification standards referenced in paragraph (b) of this section, as appropriate for the ratings held;
( 2 ) Provide training of a quality that meets the requirements of § 147.25; and
( 3 ) Ensure students have the knowledge and skills necessary to be prepared to test for a mechanic certificate and associated ratings under subpart D of part 65 of this chapter.
( b ) FAA-S-ACS-1, Aviation Mechanic General, Airframe, and Powerplant Airman Certification Standards, November 1, 2021, is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. This material is available for inspection at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact FAA, Airman Testing Standards Branch/Regulatory Support Division, 405-954-4151, *AFS630Comments@faa.gov .* For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email: *fr.inspection@nara.gov ,* or go to *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .* The material may be obtained from FAA, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591, 866-835-5322, *www.faa.gov/training_testing .*
#### JACKSON v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 18, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. A. H. Alston.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Evans, J.

No bill of exceptions, no error of record. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, James W. Klingler, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Troy Group, Inc. on Form10-K for the year ended November 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Troy Group, Inc.

 

 
|   | By:                                                          | /s/James W. Klingler |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Name: James  W. Klingler                                     |
|   | Title: Vice  President Finance & Chief Financial Officer |

 

i

----
Exhibit 10.9




              BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF KEYSPAN


     As of February 24, 2005,  the following are the base salaries (on an annual
basis)  of the  named  executive  officers  (as  defined  in Item  402(a)(3)  of
Regulation S-K) of KeySpan Corporation, effective as of the date indicated:

Robert B. Catell
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                             $1,075,000
(Effective January 1, 2005)

Robert J. Fani
President & Chief Operating Officer                                $734,000
(Effective January 1, 2005)

Wallace P. Parker Jr.
President, KeySpan Energy Delivery and KeySpan Services Inc.       $587,000
(Effective January 1, 2005)

Steven L. Zelkowitz
President, Energy Assets and Supply Group                          $545,000
(Effective January 1, 2005)

Gerald Luterman
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer                 $467,000
(Effective February 1, 2005)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 22, 2010 

p1115 

Order 

 

November 22, 2010 

141416 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141416 

 COA: 289033 

Allegan CC: 08-015734-FC 

KRISTOFER JAMES THOMPSON, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 10, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Editorial Note on Part 183
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 183.45 Issuance of Organization Designation Authorizations. ( a ) The Administrator may issue an ODA Letter of Designation if: ( 1 ) The applicant meets the applicable requirements of this subpart; and
( 2 ) A need exists for a delegation of the function.
( b ) An ODA Holder must apply to and obtain approval from the Administrator for any proposed changes to the functions or limitations described in the ODA Holder's authorization.