alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMarch 31, 2003, I, Anthony J. Gould, Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial and Chief Accounting Officer of  Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  that:

 

(2)          such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the period ended March 31, 2003, fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the periodended March 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Western Sierra Bancorp.

 
| Date:  May 12, 2003 |
|---------------------|
|                | /s/ Anthony J. Gould |   |
|                | Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |   |

 

----
#### § 401.3 The Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.

The Office is headed by an Associate Administrator to exercise the Secretary's authority to license or permit and otherwise regulate commercial space transportation and to discharge the Secretary's responsibility to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space transportation by the United States private sector.

[Doc. No. FAA-2006-24197, 72 FR 17016, Apr. 6, 2007]
Exhibit 23.2




                CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

As  independent  petroleum  consultants to The Houston  Exploration  Company and
KeySpan Exploration and Production,  LLC, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report included in this form 10-K of KeySpan Corporation and into KeySpan
Corporation's  previously filed  Registration  Statements File Nos.:  333-53657,
333-53765,  333-920003,  333-79151,  333-40472, 333-43768, 333-60294, 333-82230,
and 333-104230.

                                       NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.





                                       By:  /s/
                                            ------------------------
                                            J. Carter Henson, Jr.
                                            Senior Vice President


Houston, Texas
March 10, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4123 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4123

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct research regarding 
    and require the use of driver monitoring systems to minimize or 
              eliminate motor vehicle driver distraction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 2020

   Mr. Blumenthal (for Mr. Markey (for himself and Mr. Blumenthal)) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct research regarding 
    and require the use of driver monitoring systems to minimize or 
              eliminate motor vehicle driver distraction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stay Aware For Everyone Act of 
2020'' or the ``SAFE Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. RESEARCH REGARDING REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION OF DRIVER 
              DISTRACTION.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall conduct research 
regarding the installation and use on motor vehicles of driver 
monitoring systems to minimize or eliminate--
            (1) driver distraction;
            (2) driver disengagement;
            (3) automation complacency by drivers; and
            (4) foreseeable misuse of advanced driver-assist systems.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of completion 
of the research under subsection (a), the Secretary of Transportation 
shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 
of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 
Representatives a detailed report describing the findings of the 
research.
    (c) Rulemaking.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 4 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall 
        issue a final rule to establish performance standards for 
        driver monitoring systems and require those systems to be 
        installed on all new passenger motor vehicles, subject to 
        paragraph (2).
            (2) Compliance date.--The compliance date of the 
        performance standards and installation requirement prescribed 
        under paragraph (1) shall be not later than 2 motor vehicle 
        model years after the effective date of the final rule issued 
        under that paragraph.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 404.11 Action on a petition for rulemaking.

The FAA will process petitions for rulemaking under this part in accordance with 14 CFR 11.73.

[Doc. No. FAA-2016-6761, Amdt. No. 404-6, 83 FR 28534, June 20, 2018]
**Exhibit
      99.4**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal
      year
      ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) by CGI Group Inc. (the “Company”), the
      undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




|· | the
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|· | the
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------








Date:
      December 20, 2006




/s/
      R.
      David Anderson


R.
      David
      Anderson


Executive
      Vice-President and


Chief
      Financial Officer
#### § 25.1535 ETOPS approval.

Except as provided in § 25.3, each applicant seeking ETOPS type design approval must comply with the provisions of Appendix K of this part.

[Doc. No. FAA-2002-6717, 72 FR 1873, Jan. 16, 2007]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the
Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-KSB") of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


     Dated: March 30, 2006               /s/ Elie Housman
                                         ----------------
                                         Elie Housman, Chief Executive Officer


     Dated: March 30, 2006               /s/ Eyal Bigon
                                         ----------------
                                         Eyal Bigon, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Mart A. Davis, as Executrix of Sarah F. Le Blanc, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Title Guarantee and Trust Company, Respondent.

(Argued May 28, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*441
      *Edward H. Wilson*for appellant.

*W. H. L. Edwards, Richard S. Holmes*and *W. Crosby Roper, Jr.,*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
#### § 29.1553 Fuel quantity indicator.

If the unusable fuel supply for any tank exceeds one gallon, or five percent of the tank capacity, whichever is greater, a red arc must be marked on its indicator extending from the calibrated zero reading to the lowest reading obtainable in level flight.
```
**Exhibit 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

I, Cathleen Shoenfeld,  CFO of Eldorado Artesian Springs,  Inc. (the "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly
          period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report")  fully complies with the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and;

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Dated:  February 17, 2004

                                                /s/Cathleen Shoenfeld
                                                Cathleen Shoenfeld
                                                CFO

Subscribed and sworn to be this 17th day of February 2004.

/s/Dez Ness
Dez Ness

My commission expires: 10-27-2007
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00446-CV

Dean Springer and Integrity Financial Group, Inc.

v.

Lydia Tummel, et. al.

On appeal from the

332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-0034-13-F-2

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 1, 2016
#### BARBER v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 11, 1914.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

Affirmed on the record, in the absence of bill of exceptions.
#### W. Henry Savage, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

In a prosecution for fraudulently changing the marks of cattle with intent to claim the cattle, it is error to exclude proper testimony offered by the defendant that he had not claimed ■ the cattle after their marks were changed; and where the exclusion of such testimony. is manifestly harmful to the defendant, a judgment of conviction will be reversed.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Osceola County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*41
      *W. L. Palmer,*and *W. J'.*Sears, for Plaintiff in Error;

*Parle*Trammell, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam

— W. Henry Savage was convicted of the statutory offense of altering or changing the marks of three head of cattle not his own with intent to claim the same and to prevent identification by the true owner, and took writ of error.

At the trial the State showed that the three cattle whose marks are alleged to have'been fradulently changed with intent to claim, the cattle, together with three oxen claimed by the defendant, had been taken from an open range and placed in the custody of the sheriff in the absence of the defendant, and there was testimony offered by the State tending to show that the defendant in recovering his oxen also claimed the cattle. When the defendant took the stand he was not permitted to answer a question as to whether he had put in a claim for the three head of cattle, upon the theory that it was “a self serving statement.” This was error and prejudicial to the defendant who should have been permitted to rebut testimony offered by the State tending to show he claimed the cattle when they were in the hands of the sheriff. An answer to the question as to whether he had claimed the cattle was responsive to the State’s testimony and was not merely a self serving statement. The testimony showing guilt is not conclusive, and because of this error harmful to the defendant, the judgment is reversed.

Whitfield, O. J., and Taylor, Shackleford, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.
§ 25.1555 Control markings. ( a ) Each cockpit control, other than primary flight controls and controls whose function is obvious, must be plainly marked as to its function and method of operation.
( b ) Each aerodynamic control must be marked under the requirements of §§ 25.677 and 25.699.
( c ) For powerplant fuel controls— ( 1 ) Each fuel tank selector control must be marked to indicate the position corresponding to each tank and to each existing cross feed position;
( 2 ) If safe operation requires the use of any tanks in a specific sequence, that sequence must be marked on, or adjacent to, the selector for those tanks; and
( 3 ) Each valve control for each engine must be marked to indicate the position corresponding to each engine controlled.
( d ) For accessory, auxiliary, and emergency controls— ( 1 ) Each emergency control (including each fuel jettisoning and fluid shutoff must be colored red; and
( 2 ) Each visual indicator required by § 25.729(e) must be marked so that the pilot can determine at any time when the wheels are locked in either extreme position, if retractable landing gear is used.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 23, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 133413 & (15)(16) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan SHERMAN TOWNSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133413 COA: 276585 St. Joseph CC: 03-001068-CZ JOSEPH A. LEEMREIS AND LORI M. LEEMREIS, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to a ppeal the March 9, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not p ersuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay of proceedings is DENIED.

p0320 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 23, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



In connection with the Annual Report of Hudson Respiratory Care Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Patrick G. Yount, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Patrick G. YountPatrick G. Yount Chief Financial Officer March 16, 2004
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Knot, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Liu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ David LiuDavid Liu

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





Date: March 16, 2011
§ 151.5 General policies. ( a ) *Airport layout plan.* As used in this part, “airport layout plan” means the basic plan for the layout of an eligible airport that shows, as a minimum— ( 1 ) The present boundaries of the airport and of the offsite areas that the sponsor owns or controls for airport purposes, and of their proposed additions;
( 2 ) The location and nature of existing and proposed airport facilities (such as runways, taxiways, aprons, terminal buildings, hangars, and roads) and of their proposed modifications and extensions; and
( 3 ) The location of existing and proposed non-aviation areas, and of their existing improvements. All airport development under the Federal-aid Airport Program must be done in accordance with an approved airport layout plan. Each airport layout plan, and any change in it, is subject to FAA approval. The Administrator's signature on the face of an original airport layout plan, or of any change in it, indicates FAA approval. The FAA approves an airport layout plan only if the airport development is sound and meets applicable requirements.
( b ) *Safe, useful, and usable unit.* Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, each advance planning and engineering proposal or airport development project must provide for the planning or development of— ( 1 ) An airport or unit of an airport that is safe, useful, and usable; or
( 2 ) An additional facility that increases the safety, usefulness, or usability of an airport.
( c ) *National defense needs.* The needs of national defense are fully considered in administering the Federal-aid Airport Program. However, approval of an advance planning and engineering proposal or a project application is limited to planning or airport development necessary for civil aviation.
( d ) *Stage development.* In any case in which airport development can be accomplished more economically under stage construction, federal funds may be programmed in advance for the development over two or more years under two or more grant agreements. In such a case, the FAA makes a tentative allocation of funds for both the current and future fiscal years, rather than allocating the entire federal share in one fiscal year. A grant agreement is made only during the fiscal year in which funds are authorized to be obligated. Advance planning and engineering grants are not made under this paragraph.
[Amdt. 151-8, 30 FR 8039, June 23, 1965]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4235 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4235

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to include the Secretary of 
 Agriculture as a member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the 
                 United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2020

Mr. Tillis (for himself and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to include the Secretary of 
 Agriculture as a member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the 
                 United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agricultural Security Risk Review 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    Section 721(k)(2) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 
4565(k)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (H) through (J) as 
        subparagraphs (I) through (K), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following:
                    ``(H) The Secretary of Agriculture.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 193.3 Definitions. *Agency* means each authority of the Government of the United States, whether or not the agency is within or subject to review by another agency, but does not include— ( 1 ) The Congress;
( 2 ) The courts of the United States;
( 3 ) The governments of the territories or possessions of the United States;
( 4 ) The government of the District of Columbia;
( 5 ) Court martial and military commissions.
*De-identified* means that the identity of the source of the information, and the names of persons have been removed from the information.
*Disclose* means to release information to a person other than another agency. Examples are disclosures under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), in rulemaking proceedings, in a press release, or to a party to a legal action.
*Information* includes data, reports, source, and other information. “Information” may be used to describe the whole or a portion of a submission of information.
*Summarized* means that individual incidents are not specifically described, but are presented in statistical or other general form.
*Voluntary* means that the information was not required to be submitted as part of a mandatory program, and was not submitted as a condition of doing business with the government. “Voluntarily-provided information” does not include information submitted as part of complying with statutory, regulatory, or contractual requirements, except that information submitted as part of complying with a voluntary program under this part is considered to be voluntarily provided.
§ 414.43 Submissions; oral presentations in safety element approval actions. ( a ) Determinations in safety element approval actions under this part will be made on the basis of written submissions unless the administrative law judge, on petition or on their own initiative, determines that an oral presentation is required.
( b ) Submissions must include a detailed exposition of the evidence or arguments supporting the petition.
( c ) Petitions must be filed as soon as practicable, but in no event more than 30 days after issuance of decision or finding under § 414.37.
#### § 374.2 Applicability.

This part is applicable to all air carriers and foreign air carriers engaging in consumer credit transactions.