alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 

# Time and Date:

Approximately 11:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 10, 2000, following a recess at the conclusion of the open meeting. 

# Place:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20551. 

# Status:

Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered: 

1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees. 

2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204. 

# Supplementary Information:

You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting. 

Dated: May 3, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-11407 Filed 5-3-00; 12:38 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
CHRISTOPHER TERRY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5696

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 4, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant; Christopher Terry, pro se, Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Vonda Kathleen BRADFORD *v.*Glenn FITZGERALD et ux

5-5917

480 S.W. 2d 336

Opinion delivered May 22, 1972

*Donald Goodman*and *Donald Poe,*for appellant.

C. *Richard Lippard*for appellees.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

This sad story arises from birth of a child out of wedlock to appellant Vonda Kathleen Bradford, age 23, and adopted by appellees Mr. & Mrs. Glenn Fitzgerald. Two days after birth appellant signed a Waiver of Issuance and Service of Summons, Entry of Appearance, and Consent to Adoption. After the interlocutory order of adoption was entered, appellant intervened and resisted the final order of adoption, from which she appeals. We affirm.

The record shows that appellant had had a previous child out of wedlock who lived with appellant in her mother and stepfather’s home. When it became apparent that she was going to have another child, her mother and stepfather informed her that she could not bring the child into their home. Knowing that there was no way she could raise her first child without going back into her mother and stepfather’s home and asking for their help, she entered into discussions with appellees about adopting the forthcoming child. Appellees gave $50.00 to her stepfather and $35.00 to her before the baby was born. Thereafter Appellees paid all hospital and doctor bills. *656Appellee, Mrs. Fitzgerald quit her job to take care of the baby.

Appellant’s mother had some misgivings about the adoption by the time appellant got home from the hospital and so told the appellees before the interlocutory order was entered. Appellant, however, did not talk to the appellees until some three months after the baby was born. She stated that she admired the appellees very much and felt like in order to ask for her baby back she had to prove herself not only to her parents but to the appellees.

At the time the discussions concerning the adoption were had, appellant was unemployed. At the time of trial, however, she was steadily employed and she and her first child had moved out of her parents’ home into an apartment shared bv a divorcee and her two children.

Admittedly, the appellees have a comfortable home and Mrs. Fitzgerald is giving her full time to the child.

There is nothing in the record to show that the consent to adoption was not knowingly given and not retracted until after the entry of the interlocutory order of adoption on January 6, 1970. Under these circumstances, the trial court properly followed our holding in *Martin*v. *Ford,*224 Ark. 993, 277 S. W. 2d 842 (1955), and in considering the best welfare of the child, entered the final order of adoption.

Affirmed.
#### Sanders *v.*The State.

Crime.

(Decided February 3, 1915.

70 South. 949.)

Criminal Law; Appeal; Failure to Perfect. — Where the certificate filed on appeal from a conviction showed rendition of judgment and notice of appeal in January, 1915, but no further steps were taken to perfect the appeal, the appeal was subject to dismissal on motion at the regular call of the division to which the appeal was returnable in January, 1916.

Appeal from Dale Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. M. Sollie.

John W. Sanders was convicted of crime, and he appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

*13PELHAM, P. J.

The certificate filed in this case shows a judgment of conviction against the defendant of the offense of adultery, rendered in the trial court on the 28th day of January, 1915, and that sentence was thereupon suspended, pending an appeal to this court. It is also shown by the certificate that' the defendant gave notice in writing of an appeal on the 30th day of January, 1915. No further steps are shown to have been taken to perfect the appeal in this court, and on the regular call of this case on the 20th day of January, 1916, it was submitted on the motion of the Attorney General to dismiss.

The motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal is well taken, and the same is granted.

Appeal dismissed.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



Exhibit 10.14  


 
 

SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT
  TO THE
  MANDALAY RESORT GROUP
  EMPLOYEES' PROFIT SHARING AND INVESTMENT PLAN    
  


        This Seventeenth Amendment to the Mandalay Resort Group Employees' Profit Sharing and Investment Plan is made and entered into this 31ST day of
December, 2002, but is effective as of January 1, 2002, except as otherwise provided herein, by Mandalay Resort Group (referred to hereinafter as the "Company"). 


W I T N E S S E T H:  


        WHEREAS, the Company and the other Employers have previously adopted the Mandalay Resort Group Employees' Profit
Sharing and Investment Plan, which has been amended from time to time (as amended, the "Plan"); and 


        WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Company is authorized and empowered to further amend the Plan; and 


        WHEREAS, the Company deems it advisable and in the best interests of the Participants to amend the Plan to comply with recent changes in
applicable law. 


        NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 


I.  


        Effective as of July 1, 2002, paragraph (m) of Article VI of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 


        (m)    Catch-up Contributions.    Each Participant who is eligible to make elective deferrals under the
Plan during the Plan Year and has attained the age of 50 before the close of the Plan Year shall be eligible to make "catch-up" contributions in accordance with, and subject to the
limitations of, Section 414(v) of the Code. A "catch-up" contribution hereunder may be expressed as a fixed dollar amount per payroll period, or as a fixed percentage of pay.
Such "catch-up" contributions shall not be taken into account for purposes of the provisions of the Plan implementing the required limitations of Sections 402(g) and 415 of the Code. The
Plan shall not be treated as failing to satisfy the provisions of the Plan implementing the requirements of Section 401(k)(3), 401(k)(11), 401(k)(12), 410(b), or 416 of the Code, as applicable,
by reason of the making of such "catch-up" contributions. 


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Seventeenth Amendment has been executed as of the date first written above. 



	ATTEST:	 	MANDALAY RESORT GROUP
	

(CORPORATE SEAL)	
 	

 	
 	

 
	
/s/  YVETTE E. LANDAU      
Secretary	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  GLENN SCHAEFFER      
President
	
 	
 	

 	
 	

"COMPANY"




1









QuickLinks


SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE MANDALAY RESORT GROUP EMPLOYEES' PROFIT SHARING AND INVESTMENT PLAN
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements:



|1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-86168) pertaining to the WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. Rapidstream, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-84081) pertaining to the WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. 1996 Stock
Incentive Compensation Plan
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-43562 and Form S-8 No. 333-62742) both pertaining to the 2000 Stock Option Plan
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-51196) pertaining to the 2000 Qiave Stock Option Plan
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated March 13, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc., WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Seattle,
Washington

March 13, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of M Line Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Colin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  March 9, 2011
/s/ George ColinBy:  George ColinIts:  Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to M Line Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by M Line Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Cite as State v. Winningham, 132 Ohio St.3d 77, 2012-Ohio-1998.] 

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WINNINGHAM, APPELLANT. 

[Cite as State v. Winningham, 132 Ohio St.3d 77, 2012-Ohio-1998.] 

Discretionary appeal accepted, court of appeals’ judgment vacated, and cause 

remanded for application of United States v. Jones. 

(No. 2012-0099—Submitted March 20, 2012—Decided May 10, 2012.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-11134, 

2011-Ohio-6229. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted. 

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is 

remanded to the court of common pleas for application of United States v. Jones, 

___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 945, 181 L.Ed.2d 911 (2012). 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Melynda 

Machol, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 

Raymond L. Katz, for appellant. 

______________________
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T J UNE 15, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 8

- 1 6 5 4 5 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 7

- 0 0 0 7 0

- C R

- J

- 2 0

- M C R

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s
A S H L E Y N I C O L E R E E S E ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( J u n e 1 5 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e B I R C H , H U L L a n d H I L L , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :
J a m e s H

. B u r k e , J r

. , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r A s h l e y N i c o l e R e e s e , h a s f i l e d am o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w o n a p p e a l , s u p p o r t e d b y a b r i e f p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v
.

C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t

r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f

t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o

a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t , c o u n s e l ' s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d R e e s e ’ s

s u p e r v i s e d

- r e l e a s e r e v o c a t i o n a n d r e s u l t i n g s e n t e n c e a r e A F F I R M E D
.

2
#### § 31.51 Ballast.

Each captive gas balloon must have a means for the safe storage and controlled release of ballast. The ballast must consist of material that, if released during flight, is not hazardous to persons on the ground.
§ 25.5 Incorporations by reference. ( a ) The materials listed in this section are incorporated by reference in the corresponding sections noted. These incorporations by reference were approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. These materials are incorporated as they exist on the date of the approval, and notice of any change in these materials will be published in the Federal Register. The materials are available for purchase at the corresponding addresses noted below, and all are available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .*
( b ) The following materials are available for purchase from the following address: The National Technical Information Services (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22166. ( 1 ) Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method User's Manual, dated May 2008, document number DOT/FAA/AR-05/8, IBR approved for § 25.981 and Appendix N. It can also be obtained at the following Web site: *http://www.fire.tc.faa.gov/systems/fueltank/FTFAM.stm .*
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[73 FR 42494, July 21, 2008, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 21-101, 83 FR 9169, Mar. 5, 2018]
281-624-6827 info@trumbullunmanned.com TRUMBULL UNMANNED

April 10, 2014

Mr. Jake Troutman Program Analyst, Rulemaking FAA Office of Aviation Safety Airman and Airspace Rules Division Mr. Troutman, Re: FAA-2014-0890, we are submitting additional information for the Trumbull Unmanned, LLC (“Trumbull”) Section 333 exemption for safe UAS operations in the energy sector. Due to the proprietary nature of the information provided, we ask that they be treated as confidential information. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Respectfully, 

# Dyan Gibbens Dyan Gibbens, President Trumbull Unmanned, LLC



### Page of 1 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30488 USDC No. 94-CV-1766

__________________ LYMAN THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
versus MIKE GILLIAM, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

--------------------- August 14, 1995 Before DUHÉ, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: Lyman Thompson has filed a request for a certificate of probable cause (CPC). IT IS ORDERED that his motion be GRANTED. Thompson has failed to demonstrate that he has exhausted his state remedies, see Carter v. Estelle , 677 F.2d 427, 443 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied , 460 U.S. 1056 (1983), and has failed to demonstrate that he should be excused from exhausting his claims. See Deters v. Collins , 985 F.2d 789, 795 & n.16 (5th Cir. 1993). Therefore, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the portion of the judgment dismissing without prejudice his habeas claims for failure to exhaust is AFFIRMED.No. 95-30488 -2- The Supreme Court has held that in order to recover damages for harm caused by actions whose unlawfulness would render a conviction or sentence invalid, the plaintiff must prove that the conviction or sentence was reversed on appeal, expunged by executive order, declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such determinations, or called into question by a federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Heck v. Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 2364, 2372 (1994). Prior to Heck , this court required litigants to litigate § 1983 claims that were inextricably intertwined with habeas claims in habeas proceedings before pursuing § 1983 relief. Serio v. Members of Louisiana State Bd. of Pardons , 821 F.2d 1112, 1119 (5th Cir. 1987).The district court did not address Thompson's denial-ofaccess-to-the-courts claim, and it is unclear from the current record whether Heck precludes suit at this time. Therefore, that portion of the judgment is VACATED and the case REMANDED. On remand the district court should consider the claim in light of Heck
. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See Schwander v. Blackburn , 750 F.2d 494, 502 (5th Cir. 1985). All remaining motions are DENIED.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-2 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 2 - SKETCH Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4294 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4294

  To provide supplemental appropriations to the Community Development 
          Financial Institutions Fund, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2020

  Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Manchin, Ms. Warren, Mr. 
  Wyden, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Schatz, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. 
 Markey, Mr. Van Hollen, and Mr. Blumenthal) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide supplemental appropriations to the Community Development 
          Financial Institutions Fund, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coronavirus CDFI Funding Act''.

SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION.

    There is appropriated to the Community Development Financial 
Institutions Fund established under section 104(a)(1) of the Community 
Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 
4703(a)(1)), out of amounts in the general fund of the Treasury not 
otherwise appropriated, $1,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2020, for 
providing financial assistance and technical assistance under 
subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 108(a)(1) of the Community 
Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 
4707(a)(1)), except that subsections (d) and (e) of such section 108 
shall not apply to the provision of such assistance.
                                 <all>
```
##### 





EXHIBIT 32(a)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, J. T. Battenberg III, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.



| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ J. T. BATTENBERG III             
| |                                      
| | J. T. Battenberg III                 
| | Chairman of the Board,               
| | Chief Executive Officer and President

October 16, 2003