alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the Company), for the period ending
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers knowledge, that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods presented in the Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 4, 2009 |  | /s/ Michael E. Campbell
|                        |  | Michael E. Campbell    
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Dated: November 4, 2009 |  | /s/ Steven C. Giuliano 
|                        |  | Steven C. Giuliano     
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Arch
Chemicals, Inc. and will be retained by Arch Chemicals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 27.1187 Ventilation and drainage. Each compartment containing any part of the powerplant installation must have provision for ventilation and drainage of flammable fluids. The drainage means must be— ( a ) Effective under conditions expected to prevail when drainage is needed, and
( b ) Arranged so that no discharged fluid will cause an additional fire hazard.
[Doc. No. 29247, 64 FR 45095, Aug. 18, 1999]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 25894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11136]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 141 and 142

[FRL-6587-8]
RIN 2040-AA97


Ground Water Rule Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) is holding a public meeting on May 18, 2000 in the EPA 
auditorium in Washington, DC. The meeting will provide a description 
and summary of the proposed Ground Water Rule (GWR) to be published in 
the Federal Register on May 10, 2000.
    EPA is inviting all interested members of the public to attend the 
meeting. EPA is instituting an open door policy to allow any member of 
the public to attend the meeting for any length of time. Approximately 
150 seats will be available for the public. Seats will be available on 
a first-come, first served basis.

DATES: The meeting will start at 2 PM on May 18, 2000 and will adjourn 
at 4:00 PM.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the EPA auditorium located at 
401 M Street SW, Washington, DC 20460.
    For information about the meeting, contact the Office of Ground 
Water and Drinking Water (MC 4607), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone 
(202) 260-3309. The GWR proposal, GWR fact sheet, and GWR draft 
implementation guidance may be obtained from www.epa.gov/safewater or 
by calling the Safe Drinking Water Hotline, telephone (800) 426-4791.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information, contact the 
Safe Drinking Water Hotline, telephone (800) 426-4791. The Safe 
Drinking Water Hotline is open Monday through Friday, excluding Federal 
holidays, from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

    Dated: April 28, 2000.
Cynthia C. Dougherty,
Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 00-11136 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
§ 29.175 Demonstration of static longitudinal stability. ( a ) *Climb.* Static longitudinal stability must be shown in the climb condition at speeds from Vy − 10 kt to Vy + 10 kt with— ( 1 ) Critical weight;
( 2 ) Critical center of gravity;
( 3 ) Maximum continuous power;
( 4 ) The landing gear retracted; and
( 5 ) The rotorcraft trimmed at Vy.
( b ) *Cruise.* Static longitudinal stability must be shown in the cruise condition at speeds from 0.8 VNE−10 kt to 0.8 VNE + 10 kt or, if VH is less than 0.8 VNE, from VH − 10 kt to VH + 10 kt, with— ( 1 ) Critical weight;
( 2 ) Critical center of gravity;
( 3 ) Power for level flight at 0.8 VNE or VH, whichever is less;
( 4 ) The landing gear retracted; and
( 5 ) The rotorcraft trimmed at 0.8 VNE or VH, whichever is less.
( c ) V *NE* . Static longitudinal stability must be shown at speeds from VNE − 20 kt to VNE with— ( 1 ) Critical weight;
( 2 ) Critical center of gravity;
( 3 ) Power required for level flight at VNE − 10 kt or maximum continuous power, whichever is less;
( 4 ) The landing gear retracted; and
( 5 ) The rotorcraft trimmed at VNE − 10 kt.
( d ) *Autorotation.* Static longitudinal stability must be shown in autorotation at— ( 1 ) Airspeeds from the minimum rate of descent airspeed − 10 kt to the minimum rate of descent airspeed + 10 kt, with— ( i ) Critical weight;
( ii ) Critical center of gravity;
( iii ) The landing gear extended; and
( iv ) The rotorcraft trimmed at the minimum rate of descent airspeed.
( 2 ) Airspeeds from the best angle-of-glide airspeed − 10kt to the best angle-of-glide airspeed + 10kt, with— ( i ) Critical weight;
( ii ) Critical center of gravity;
( iii ) The landing gear retracted; and
( iv ) The rotorcraft trimmed at the best angle-of-glide airspeed.
[Amdt. 29-51, 73 FR 11001, Feb. 29, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>     1000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>            OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                              509     
<SECURITIES>                    916
<RECEIVABLES>                37
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                  13
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  0 
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      5598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         0
<BONDS>                       0
<COMMON>                       8650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       5598
<SALES>                          26
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                418
<CGS>                            15
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    27
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                235
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 168    
<INCOME-TAX>                  7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                0
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                    161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
                             

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.3

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION.
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2004 (the Report) by CGI Group, Inc. (the Company),
the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 7, 2005

| |                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Serge Godin              Serge Godin
Chairman of the Board and
  Chief Executive Officer
§ 145.211 Quality control system. ( a ) A certificated repair station must establish and maintain a quality control system acceptable to the FAA that ensures the airworthiness of the articles on which the repair station or any of its contractors performs maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations.
( b ) Repair station personnel must follow the quality control system when performing maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations under the repair station certificate and operations specifications.
( c ) A certificated repair station must prepare and keep current a quality control manual in a format acceptable to the FAA that includes the following: ( 1 ) A description of the system and procedures used for— ( i ) Inspecting incoming raw materials to ensure acceptable quality;
( ii ) Performing preliminary inspection of all articles that are maintained;
( iii ) Inspecting all articles that have been involved in an accident for hidden damage before maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alteration is performed;
( iv ) Establishing and maintaining proficiency of inspection personnel;
( v ) Establishing and maintaining current technical data for maintaining articles;
( vi ) Qualifying and surveilling noncertificated persons who perform maintenance, prevention maintenance, or alterations for the repair station;
( vii ) Performing final inspection and return to service of maintained articles;
( viii ) Calibrating measuring and test equipment used in maintaining articles, including the intervals at which the equipment will be calibrated; and
( ix ) Taking corrective action on deficiencies;
( 2 ) References, where applicable, to the manufacturer's inspection standards for a particular article, including reference to any data specified by that manufacturer;
( 3 ) A sample of the inspection and maintenance forms and instructions for completing such forms or a reference to a separate forms manual; and
( 4 ) Procedures for revising the quality control manual required under this section and notifying the responsible Flight Standards office of the revisions, including how often the responsible Flight Standards office will be notified of revisions.
( d ) A certificated repair station must notify its responsible Flight Standards office of revisions to its quality control manual.
[Docket No. FAA-1999-5836, 66 FR 41117, Aug. 6, 2001, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 145-32, 83 FR 9176, Mar. 5, 2018]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT00-26-000]

Take notice that on April 21, 2000, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, with an effective date of April 1, 2000.

Transco states that the purpose of the filing is to update certain Delivery Point Entitlement (DPE) tariff sheets in accordance with the provisions of Section 19 of the General Terms and Conditions of Transco's Third Revised Volume No. 1. Transco states that the tariff sheets have been revised to include changes as a result of the termination of the Rate Schedule FT service agreement with Prior Energy Corporation and the associated open season. Transco states that also included in the filing are tariff sheets which update the Index of Daily Facility Group and Delivery Point Entitlements and Related Maps.

Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each of its affected customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at  http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11352  Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 89 (Monday, May 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26582-26583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-469-807]


Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Spain: Extension of Time Limit for 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Smith at (202) 482-5193 or 
Timothy Finn at (202) 482-0065, Import Administration, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20230.

Time Limits

Statutory Time Limits

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''), requires the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') to 
make a preliminary determination within 245 days after the last day of 
the anniversary month of an order or finding for which a review is 
requested. However, if it is not practicable to complete the 
preliminary results of review within this time period, section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit 
for the preliminary determination to a maximum of 365 days.

Background

    On November 4, 1999, the Department published a notice of 
initiation of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
stainless steel wire rod from Spain, covering the period March 5, 1998 
through August 31, 1999 (64 FR 60161). The preliminary

[[Page 26583]]

results are currently due no later than June 1, 2000.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Review

    We determine that it is not practicable to complete the preliminary 
results of this review within the original time limit. See Decision 
Memorandum from Tom Futtner to Holly A. Kuga, dated April 28, 2000, 
which is on file in the Central Records Unit, Room B-099 of the main 
Commerce building. Therefore the Department is extending the time limit 
for completion of the preliminary results until no later than September 
29, 2000. We intend to issue the final results no later than 120 days 
after the publication of the preliminary results notice.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Act.

    Dated: April 28, 2000.
Holly A. Kuga,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import Administration, Group II.
[FR Doc. 00-11459 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  KeySpan   Corporation   (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert B.  Catell,  Chairman  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Corporation,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Corporation.


                                                /s/ Robert B. Catell
                                                --------------------
                                                Name: Robert B. Catell
                                                Title: Chairman and Chief
                                                       Executive Officer
                                                Date: March 6, 2003



Note: A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to KeySpan Corporation and will be retained by KeySpan Corporation
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
SERVED : JUN E10 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N . -^:^ ' r'rPpqMlQN! ^ OFFIC EO FHEARING S ' " ' WASHINGTON , D C . . ,„ , f ^ \\

- ^ INTH EMATTE RO F EMPIR EFLIGH T ACADEM Y FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B EASSIGNED ]

(Civi l Penalt y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2011-029 0 ORDE RREASSIGNIN GPROCEEDIN G In th e interes t

o f judicia l efficiency , th e above-captione dproceedin g i s reassigne dfrom Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e Ronni e A . Yode r t o Administrativ e Law Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do nth e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o nth e attache dServic e List . S O ORDERED .

RoiiSi e A . Yo d Chie f Administrativ

j Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDM S No . FAA-2011-029 0 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Gregory S . Winton , Respondent' s Counse l Th e Aviatio n Law Firm On e Researc hCourt, Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0 TEL : 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-2525 Zachar y M . Berman , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , AEA- 7 Eastern Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaza , Roo m56 1 Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-325 8 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo r servic e i nperso no r

b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 . - 2 -
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BRENT GORDON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1465

[January 4, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Laura C. Burkhart, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502022MH001373ASB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jacqueline I. 

Kurland, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals from the circuit court’s order directing that he 

be subject to involuntary inpatient placement and be appointed a guardian 

advocate. He argues the circuit court lacked clear and convincing evidence 

that because of his mental illness, he “is incapable of surviving alone or 

with the help of willing and responsible family or friends, including 

available alternative services, and, without treatment, is likely to suffer 

from neglect or refuse to care for himself ..., and such neglect or refusal 

poses a real and present threat of substantial harm to his ... well-being[,]” 

or “[t]here is a substantial likelihood that in the near future he ... will inflict 

serious bodily harm on [him]self or others, as evidenced by recent behavior 

causing, attempting, or threatening such harm[.]” § 394.467(1)(a)2., Fla. 

Stat. (2021).
2

The state concedes the circuit court lacked clear and convincing 

evidence to support its finding that the appellant met section 

394.467(1)(a)2.’s requirements for involuntary patient placement.

Based on our review of the record, we agree with the state’s concession 

of error. Therefore, we reverse the circuit court’s order, and remand for 

the circuit court to enter an order denying the petition for involuntary 

patient placement.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

GROSS, MAY, and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.