alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1836

KENNETH O. CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF VIRGINIA, Government Employer Fault

Liable; LAWSUIT RECIPIENT AND REPRESENTATIVE

FOR STATE OF VIRGINIA GOVERNMENT, Attorney

General, Jerry W. Kilgore; GROUNDS FOR

DEFENDANT FAULT LIABLE IS EMPLOYEE MISUSE OF

LAW AUTHORITY CAUSE PLAINTIFF,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 02-1839

KENNETH O. CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JACK GOLDBERG, a/k/a Jake Goldberg; LAWSUIT

RECIPIENT AND REPRESENTATIVE FOR STATE OF

VIRGINIA GOVERNMENT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, JERRY

W. KILGORE; GROUNDS FOR COMPENSATION

DEFENDANT'S MISUSE OF LAW AUTHORITY CAUSE

PLAINTIFF,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-18-4, CA-02-17)

Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth O. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth O. Carter seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the

district court. See Carter v. State of Virginia, No. CA-02-18-4

(E.D. Va. July 25, 2002); Carter v. Goldberg, No. CA-02-17 (E.D.

Va. July 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 10.18**

 

**The RiceX Company andKreglinger Europe**

 

AGREEMENTON EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTIONSHIP IN EUROPE

 

Accordingto our previous verbal agreement we hereby confirm our appointment ofKREGLINGER EUROPE N.V. and/or KREGLINGER BENELUX N.V. as the sole distributorsin the “territory” for all products supplied by RICEX and made by RICEX or anytoll-manufacturer contracted by RICEX. Kreglinger Europe also has the right andopportunity to market and sell all products on a non-exclusive basis outsidethe territory and North America.

 

Theterritory is defined as the UK and the Benelux States.

 

Anycustomers made by Kreglinger outside the agreed territory (North Americaexcluded) Will be declared Kreglingers’ reserved customers for the duration ofthe agreement.

 

RICEXwill provide all useful technical and commercial assistance to KREGLINGER andKREGLIINGER in return will keep RICEX informed on customer-information andupdate on the status of sales and developments and will not sell or promoteother products that can be in competition with products from RICEX.

 

Theterm of this agreement is valid for a period of 2 years with automatic annualrenewals unless either party cancels the agreement in writing 90 days prior tothe anniversary date of the agreement.

 

[Confidentialparagraph]

 

Thegoals of this agreement are to expand business opportunities into Europe forThe RiceX Company and to expand the product line and sales for KreglingerEurope. The measurement of success is based on new business developed and thenumber of working projects at food and nutrition companies. The “new business”target for the first year is based on initiating quality projects. The numberof working projects should exceed 30 by the end of the first year. In order tomake this a successful venture for both companies, The RiceX Company willcommit to a minimum of two trips annually for the purpose of training, tradeshows, and/or customer calls as needed by Kreglinger Europe.

 

Inwitness where of, the parties here to have caused this agreement to beexecuted, in duplicate, by their duly authorized representatives as to the datewritten below.

 

October2002

 

KREGLINGEREUROPE

 
| /s/  Wim ARNOUTS |   |   |
|------------------|--------|--------|

 

RICEX

 
| /s/  Daniel L. McPeak, Jr. |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|

 

----
§ 25.1189 Shutoff means. ( a ) Each engine installation and each fire zone specified in § 25.1181(a)(4) and (5) must have a means to shut off or otherwise prevent hazardous quantities of fuel, oil, deicer, and other flammable fluids, from flowing into, within, or through any designated fire zone, except that shutoff means are not required for— ( 1 ) Lines, fittings, and components forming an integral part of an engine; and
( 2 ) Oil systems for turbine engine installations in which all components of the system in a designated fire zone, including oil tanks, are fireproof or located in areas not subject to engine fire conditions.
( b ) The closing of any fuel shutoff valve for any engine may not make fuel unavailable to the remaining engines.
( c ) Operation of any shutoff may not interfere with the later emergency operation of other equipment, such as the means for feathering the propeller.
( d ) Each flammable fluid shutoff means and control must be fireproof or must be located and protected so that any fire in a fire zone will not affect its operation.
( e ) No hazardous quantity of flammable fluid may drain into any designated fire zone after shutoff.
( f ) There must be means to guard against inadvertent operation of the shutoff means and to make it possible for the crew to reopen the shutoff means in flight after it has been closed.
( g ) Each tank-to-engine shutoff valve must be located so that the operation of the valve will not be affected by powerplant or engine mount structural failure.
( h ) Each shutoff valve must have a means to relieve excessive pressure accumulation unless a means for pressure relief is otherwise provided in the system.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5677, Apr. 8, 1970; Amdt. 25-57, 49 FR 6849, Feb. 23, 1984]
§ 35.39 Endurance test. Endurance tests on the propeller system must be made on a representative engine in accordance with paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, as applicable, without evidence of failure or malfunction. ( a ) Fixed-pitch and ground adjustable-pitch propellers must be subjected to one of the following tests: ( 1 ) A 50-hour flight test in level flight or in climb. The propeller must be operated at takeoff power and rated rotational speed during at least five hours of this flight test, and at not less than 90 percent of the rated rotational speed for the remainder of the 50 hours.
( 2 ) A 50-hour ground test at takeoff power and rated rotational speed.
( b ) Variable-pitch propellers must be subjected to one of the following tests: ( 1 ) A 110-hour endurance test that must include the following conditions: ( i ) Five hours at takeoff power and rotational speed and thirty 10-minute cycles composed of: ( A ) Acceleration from idle,
( B ) Five minutes at takeoff power and rotational speed,
( C ) Deceleration, and
( D ) Five minutes at idle.
( ii ) Fifty hours at maximum continuous power and rotational speed,
( iii ) Fifty hours, consisting of ten 5-hour cycles composed of: ( A ) Five accelerations and decelerations between idle and takeoff power and rotational speed,
( B ) Four and one half hours at approximately even incremental conditions from idle up to, but not including, maximum continuous power and rotational speed, and
( C ) Thirty minutes at idle.
( 2 ) The operation of the propeller throughout the engine endurance tests prescribed in part 33 of this chapter.
( c ) An analysis based on tests of propellers of similar design may be used in place of the tests of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
[Amdt. 35-8, 73 FR 63348, Oct. 24, 2008]
# Official Journal C 138/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 138 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 603 May 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 138

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 603 May 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2017/C 138/01 | Council Decision of 25 April 2017 renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training | 1 |
| 2017/C 138/02 | Council Decision of 25 April 2017 renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training | 2 |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 138/03 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2017/C 138/01

Council Decision of 25 April 2017 renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

1

2017/C 138/02

Council Decision of 25 April 2017 renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

2

European Commission

2017/C 138/03

Euro exchange rates

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:418 Filed:06/22/17 Entered:06/22/17 10:53:56 Desc: MainDocument Page 1 of 2Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:418 Filed:06/22/17 Entered:06/22/17 10:53:56 Desc: MainDocument Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 84 (Monday, May 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10696]



[[Page 25352]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) National Advisory 
Council to be held in May 2000.
    A portion of the meeting will be open and will include a discussion 
of the Center's National Treatment Plan and an update on the Opiod 
Accreditation and Buprenorphine activities. Public comments are welcome 
during the open session. Please communicate with the individual listed 
as contact below for guidance. If anyone needs special accommodations 
for persons with disabilities please notify the contact listed below.
    If anyone needs special accommodations for persons with 
disabilities, please notify the Contact listed below.
    The meeting will also include the review, discussion, and 
evaluation of a single source grant application. Therefore a portion of 
the meeting will be closed to the public as determined by the 
Administrator, SAMHSA, in accordance with Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), 
(4), and (6) and 5 U.S.C. App. 2, Sec. 10(d).
    A summary of the meeting and roster of council members may be 
obtained from: Mrs. Marjorie Cashion, CSAT, National Advisory Council, 
Rockwall II Building, Suite 619, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 
20857, Telephone: (301) 443-8923.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the contact 
whose name and telephone number is listed below.
    Committee Name: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment National 
Advisory Council.
    Meeting Date: May 12, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Pooks Hill Hotel, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
    Closed: May 12, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-9:00 a.m.
    Open: May 12, 2000, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Contact: Marjorie M. Cashion, Executive Secretary, Telephone: (301) 
443-8923, and FAX: (301) 480-6077.

    Dated: April 24, 2000.
Toian Vaughn,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-10696 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.1 Applicability and description of part. ( a ) *Applicability.* This part governs the conduct of all aviation economic proceedings before the Department whether instituted by order of the Department or by the filing with the Department of an application, complaint, petition, motion, or other authorized or required document. This part also contains delegations to administrative law judges and to the DOT decisionmaker of the Department's function to render the agency decision in certain cases and the procedures for review of those decisions. This part applies unless otherwise specified by order of the Department.
( b ) *Description.* Subpart A of this part sets forth general rules applicable to all types of proceedings. Each of the other subparts of this part sets forth special rules applicable to the type of proceedings described in the title of the subpart. Therefore, for information as to applicable rules, reference should be made to subpart A and to the rules in the subpart relating to the particular type of proceeding, if any. In addition, reference should be made to Subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United States Code (Transportation) (“the Statute”), and to the substantive rules, regulations and orders of the Department relating to the proceeding. Wherever there is any conflict between one of the general rules in subpart A and a special rule in another subpart applicable to a particular type of proceeding, the special rule will govern.
( c ) *Reference to part and method of citing rules.* This part may be referred to as the “Rules of Practice”. Each section, and any paragraph or subparagraph thereof, may be referred to as a “Rule”. The number of each rule need include only the numbers and letters at the right of the decimal point. For example, “302.7 *Service of documents*”, may be referred to as “Rule 7”.
#### Laura S. L. Newhall, Respondent, *v.*Margaret McCann et al., Individually and as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of James McCann, Deceased, Appellants.

(Argued May 28, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*446
      *Daniel Mungall*and *Charles H. Lane*for appellants.

*Harry J. Laragh*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: O’Brien, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman and Hubbs, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP98-18-004]


Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

May 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2000, Iroquois Gas Transmission System, 
L.P. tendered for filing Second Revised Sheet No. 6. Iroquois requests 
that the Commission approve the tariff sheets effective May 1, 2000.
    Iroquois states that the revised tariff sheets reflect a negotiated 
rate between Iroquois and Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC for 
transportation under Rate Schedule RTS beginning on May 1, 2000 through 
November 1, 2000.
    Iroquois states that copies of its filing were served on all 
jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory agencies and 
all parties to the proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11631 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 171.315 Azimuth monitor system requirements. ( a ) The approach azimuth or back azimuth monitor system must cause the radiation to cease and a warning must be provided at the designated control point if any of the following conditions persist for longer than the periods specified: ( 1 ) There is a change in the ground equipment contribution to the mean course error component such that the path following error at the reference datum or in the direction of any azimuth radial, exceeds the limits specified in §§ 171.313(e)(1) or 171.313(j) for a period of more than one second. Note:
The above requirement and the requirement to limit the ground equipment mean error to ±10 ft. can be satisfied by the following procedure. The integral monitor alarm limit should be set to the angular equivalent of ±10 ft. at the approach reference datum. This will limit the electrical component of the mean course error to ±10 ft. The field monitor alarm limit should be set such that with the mean course error at the alarm limit the total allowed PFE is not exceeded on any commissioned approach course from the limit of coverage to an altitude of 100 feet.
( 2 ) There are errors in two consecutive transmissions of Basic Data Words 1, 2, 4 or 5.
( 3 ) There is a reduction in the radiated power to a level not less than that specified in §§ 171.313(a)(4) or 171.313(g)(4) for a period of more than one second.
( 4 ) There is an error in the preamble DPSK transmissions which occurs more than once in any one second period.
( 5 ) There is an error in the time division multiplex synchronization of a particular azimuth function that the requirement specified in § 171.311(e) is not satisfied and if this condition persists for more than one second.
( 6 ) A failure of the monitor is detected.
( b ) Radiation of the following fuctions must cease and a warning provided at the designated control point if there are errors in 2 consecutive transmissions: ( 1 ) Morse Code Identification,
( 2 ) Basic Data Words 3 and 6,
( 3 ) Auxiliary Data Words.
( c ) The period during which erroneous guidance information is radiated must not exceed the periods specified in § 171.315(a). If the fault is not cleared within the time allowed, the ground equipment must be shut down. After shutdown, no attempt must be made to restore service until a period of 20 seconds has elapsed.
EXHIBIT 48 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4014-44 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 16:51:23 Desc:

Exhibit 48 Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4014-44 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 16:51:23 Desc:

Exhibit 48 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1998             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997             NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                           3,901                       0
<SECURITIES>                                    28,762                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,480                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    140,947                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196,779                       0
<PP&E>                                         163,718                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,378                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 289,015                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,122                       0
<BONDS>                                         59,706                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,000                       0
<COMMON>                                            58                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,187                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   289,015                       0
<SALES>                                         99,711                 279,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,711                 279,954
<CGS>                                           74,902                 212,320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,989                  83,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   610                   1,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,153                   3,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,790)                (17,278)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,554)                 (7,084)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,236)                (10,194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,236)                (10,194)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.15)                 ($0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.15)                 ($0.64)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                          BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION

               FORM 10-Q for Quarterly Period Ended March 30, 2003

                                Exhibit No. 10.1

                            AMENDMENT TO KEY EMPLOYEE
                           SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN

      WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has established the Key Employee Savings
and Investment Plan ("KESIP") to permit Board-elected officers and other
designated key employees the opportunity to defer a portion of their regular
compensation and total bonus payout that are not eligible for deferral under the
Employee Savings and Investment Plan ("ESIP"), and

      WHEREAS, the Board desires to modify the KESIP to match employee
contribution limits with those in the ESIP and to clarify the date on which
distributions under the KESIP commence,

      RESOLVED, that sections 3.1(a) and 3.2(a) of the Key Employee Savings and
Investment Plan are amended to replace "(not exceeding 16%)" with "(not
exceeding 30%)".

      FURTHER RESOLVED, that the first sentence of section 6.1 of the Key
Employee Savings and Investment Plan is amended to read: "Except as otherwise
may be provided in this Article VI, distributions of a Participant's Account
shall be made to the Participant (or the Participant's Beneficiary in the event
of the Participant's death before all amounts are paid) in ten (10) annual
installments, with the first installment to be paid in January of the year
following the later of the Calendar Year in which the Participant retires or
attains age 62, and with subsequent installments to be paid in each succeeding
January until the Participant's Account shall be distributed in full."
§ 300.6 Practitioners' standards of conduct. Every person representing a client in matters before DOT in all contacts with DOT employees, should: ( a ) Strictly observe the standards of professional conduct;
( b ) Refrain from statements or other actions designed to mislead DOT or to cause unwarranted delay;
( c ) Avoid offensive or intemperate behavior;
( d ) Advise all clients to avoid improprieties and to obey the law as the attorney believes it to be; and
( e ) Terminate the professional relationship with any client who persists in improprieties in proceedings before DOT.