alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SWEAT v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 8, 1916.)

Appeal from Covington Circuit Court.'

•Heard before Hon. A. B. Foster.

No counsel marked-for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

-------------------------------------------------------------x

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

 as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.

 Debtors.

1

-------------------------------------------------------------x

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Timothy R. Quinn, depose and say that I am employed by Prime Clerk LLC (“Prime 

Clerk”), the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases.

At my direction and under my supervision, employees of Prime Clerk caused Notices of 

Transfer of Claim based on Official Form 2100A, to be served via First Class Mail on the date 

and upon the Transferor and Transferee, as set forth on the Claim Transfer Service List attached 

hereto as Exhibit A.

 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and 

the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 

17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and 

Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth 

of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) (Title III case numbers are listed as 

Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3994 Filed:10/01/18 Entered:10/01/18 12:41:10 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3994 Filed:10/01/18 Entered:10/01/18 12:41:10 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Exhibit A

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3994 Filed:10/01/18 Entered:10/01/18 12:41:10 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Exhibit A

Claim Transfer Service List

Served via First Class Mail on the Date Set Forth Below

Docket # Transferor Transferee Date of Service

3872

Syncora Guarantee Inc.

Attn: James W. Lundy, Jr., 

General Counsel

135 W. 50th Street, 20th Floor

New York, NY 10020

Syncora Guarantee Inc.

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Attn: My Chi To

919 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Whitebox Multi-Strategy 

Partners, LP; Whitebox 

Asymmetric Partners, LP; 

Pandora Select Partners, LP; 

Whitebox GT Fund, LP; Whitebox 

Caja Balance Fund, LP

c/o Whitebox Advisors, LLC

Attn: Scott Specken

3033 Excelsior Blvd, Suite 300

Minneapolis, MN 55416-4675

September 27, 2018

In re: The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al.

Case No. 17-03283 Page 1 of 1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3994 Filed:10/01/18 Entered:10/01/18 12:41:10 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 4
§ 25.1199 Extinguishing agent containers. ( a ) Each extinguishing agent container must have a pressure relief to prevent bursting of the container by excessive internal pressures.
( b ) The discharge end of each discharge line from a pressure relief connection must be located so that discharge of the fire extinguishing agent would not damage the airplane. The line must also be located or protected to prevent clogging caused by ice or other foreign matter.
( c ) There must be a means for each fire extinguishing agent container to indicate that the container has discharged or that the charging pressure is below the established minimum necessary for proper functioning.
( d ) The temperature of each container must be maintained, under intended operating conditions, to prevent the pressure in the container from— ( 1 ) Falling below that necessary to provide an adequate rate of discharge; or
( 2 ) Rising high enough to cause premature discharge.
( e ) If a pyrotechnic capsule is used to discharge the extinguishing agent, each container must be installed so that temperature conditions will not cause hazardous deterioration of the pyrotechnic capsule.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5678, Apr. 8, 1970; Amdt. 25-40, 42 FR 15044, Mar. 17, 1977]
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.115 Applicable requirements. ( a ) Each applicant for a supplemental type certificate must show that the altered product meets applicable requirements specified in § 21.101 and— ( 1 ) In the case of an acoustical change described in § 21.93(b), show compliance with the applicable noise requirements of part 36 of this chapter;
( 2 ) In the case of an emissions change described in § 21.93(c), show compliance with the applicable fuel venting and exhaust emissions requirements of part 34 of this chapter; and
( 3 ) In the case of a fuel efficiency change described in § 21.93(d), show compliance with the applicable fuel efficiency requirements of part 38 of this chapter.
( b ) Each applicant for a supplemental type certificate must meet §§ 21.33 and 21.53 with respect to each change in the type design.
[Amdt. 21-17, 32 FR 14927, Oct. 28, 1967, as amended by Amdt. 21-42, 40 FR 1033, Jan. 6, 1975; Amdt. 21-52A, 45 FR 79009, Nov. 28, 1980; Amdt. 21-61, 53 FR 3540, Feb. 5, 1988; Amdt. 21-68, 55 FR 32860, Aug. 10, 1990; Amdt. 21-71, 57 FR 42854, Sept. 16, 1992; Amdt. 21-77, 65 FR 36266, June 7, 2000; Amdt. No. 21-107, 89 FR 12653, Feb. 16, 2024]
#### In the Matter of John M. Kelly, Appellant, against William F. Morgan, Jr., as Commissioner of Public Markets of the City of New York, Respondent.

(Submitted September 28, 1936;

decided September 29, 1936.)

Motion to vacate order dismissing appeal and for leave to file and serve undertaking granted on condition undertaking is filed and served and appellant pays ten dollars costs within ten days; otherwise, denied with ten dollars costs. (See 271 N. Y. 616.)
§ 374.3 Compliance with the Consumer Credit Protection Act and regulations. ( a ) Each air carrier and foreign air carrier shall comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. 1601-1693r. Any violation of the following requirements of that Act will be a violation of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, enforceable by the Department of Transportation: ( 1 ) The Truth in Lending Act, as supplemented by the Fair Credit Billing Act, 15 U.S.C. 1601-1667, requiring disclosure of credit terms to the consumer and prohibiting inaccurate or unfair credit billing and credit card practices.
( 2 ) The Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681-1681 setting forth requirements to be met by consumer credit reporting agencies and persons who use consumer credit reports.
( b ) Each air carrier and foreign air carrier shall comply with the requirements of Regulation B, 12 CFR part 1002, and Regulation Z, 12 CFR part 1026, of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board. Any violation of the requirements of those regulations will be a violation of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, enforceable by the Department of Transportation.
[62 FR 25841, May 12, 1997, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15939, Apr. 16, 2019]
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00219-CR

James Euldy Serrell, III

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant County (1415264D)

November 10, 2016

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
#### MOBILE FISH & OYSTER CO. v. INGE.

(Decided June 30, 1916.)

Appeal from Mobile Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. Saffold Berney.

Ervin & McAleer, for appellant. FRANCIS J. Inge, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed by agreement.
§ 298.50 Application. ( a ) Any person desiring to provide air transportation as a commuter air carrier must first obtain a Commuter Air Carrier Authorization. This shall be accomplished by filing with the Department— ( 1 ) An application in accordance with the requirements of parts 201 and 302 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Data in accordance with part 204 of this chapter to support a determination by the Department that the person is “fit, willing, and able” to operate the proposed commuter service; and
( 3 ) A $670 filing fee submitted in accordance with the provisions of § 389.21 of this chapter.
( b ) An executed original and two true copies of an application for a Commuter Air Carrier Authorization shall be filed with Docket Operations Office, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
[70 FR 25768, May 16, 2005, as amended by DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements contained in Item 1 of Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          23,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  213,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    147,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               493,200
<PP&E>                                         916,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 552,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,056,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          237,100
<BONDS>                                        286,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     433,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,056,300
<SALES>                                        694,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               694,200
<CGS>                                          501,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  501,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               134,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11542]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Endangered and Threatened Species Permit Application

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following applicant has applied for a permit amendment to 
conduct certain activities with endangered species. This notice is 
provided pursuant to section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.).

Permit Number TE 809227-13

    Applicant: BHE Environmental, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio.
    The applicant requests a permit to take (collect) 33 fish species 
and 68 mussel species throughout their ranges in U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Regions 3, 4 and 5. Activities are proposed for studies to identify 
populations of listed fish and mussel species and to develop methods to 
minimize or avoid project related impacts to those populations. The 
scientific research is aimed at enhancement of survival of the species 
in the wild.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Regional 
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services 
Operations, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111-4056, and 
must be received within 30 days of the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review by any party who submits a written request for a 
copy of such documents to the following office within 30 days of the 
date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Ecological Services Operations, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, 
Minnesota 55111-4056. Telephone: (612/713-5343); FAX: (612/713-5292).

    Dated: May 2, 2000.
T.J. Miller,
Acting Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, Fort 
Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 00-11542 Filed 5-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[Civ. No. 2079.

First Appellate District.

January 22, 1917.]

#### CALIFORNIA WESTERN RAILROAD AND NAVIGATION COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION et al., Respondents.

Workmen’s Compensation Act.—Award affirmed.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Pettis & Pemberton, for Petitioner.

Christopher M. Bradley, and C. H. McConaughy, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

The petition in the first instance, as it appeared to the court, alleged in effect that the award of the *808commission was dependent upon the testimony contained in the deposition of the mother of the deceased taken in Finland, and which deposition was given by the witness without having been subjected to an oath. It was also alleged that the deposition was not duly authenticated. The record before us now shows that the witness who gave her deposition was duly sworn, and the deposition also appears to be duly authenticated; and upon an examination of the record we believe that the evidence as shown by that deposition sufficiently supports the ■ award of the commission. For these reasons the award will be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
#### Michael DiMaggio, Plaintiff, v Chase Manhattan Bank et al., Defendants, Structure Tone Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, and Raised Computer Floors, Inc., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[698 NYS2d 656]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered January 4, 1999, granting Structure Tone Construction Co. (Structure) partial summary judgment on its cross-claims and directing Raised Computer Floors, Inc. (Computer) to pay Structure for all defense costs incurred since the inception of the lawsuit, including presént and future defense costs, and to indemnify Structure for any resulting damages that may be awarded to plaintiff, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and partial summary judgment denied.

The motion court erred in granting Structure’s motion for partial summary judgment on its cross-claims. First, it was error to grant the motion as to the first, third and fourth cross-claims because the affidavit in support of the motion offered no evidentiary showing in support of those claims for indemnification, let alone “a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law * * * sufficient * * * to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact” *(Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324). In the absence of such proof by a summary judgment proponent, the motion must be denied, even if the opposing papers are insufficient to defeat the motion *(supra).*Next, while the' supporting affidavit did allege proof in support of the second cross-claim, breach of duty to procure insurance coverage naming Structure as additional insured, Computer offered in opposition a certificate of insurance representing the agreed-upon coverage. Such evidence raised an issue of fact as to coverage on summary judgment, although it was not sufficient, standing alone, to establish coverage here as a matter of law *(Horn Maintenance Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*225 AD2d 443, 444). Consequently, summary judgment should have been denied as to that cross-claim as well.

However, Computer’s denials in response to the properly utilized notice to admit the authenticity of the certificate of insurance, the same document that Computer subsequently submitted in opposition to Structure’s motion, cannot be justified and should be strongly condemned. Such conduct unneces*90sarily precipitated the motion for summary judgment and this appeal, squandering a significant amount of Structure’s and the court’s resources. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Williams, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 380
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 380.64 Department action on a registration application. ( a ) After a registration is received, one of the following actions will be taken. ( 1 ) The application will be approved by the stamping of the effective date of registration on OST Form 4530 and returning the duplicate copy of the form to the operator;
( 2 ) Additional information will be requested for the applicant;
( 3 ) The applicant will be notified that its application will require further analysis or procedures, or is being referred to the Department for formal action;
( 4 ) The registration application will be rejected if it does not comply with the filing requirements of this subpart;
( 5 ) The application will be approved subject to such terms, conditions, or limitations as may be required by the public interest; or
( 6 ) The registration application will be rejected for reasons relating to the failure of effective reciprocity or if the Department finds that it would be in the public interest to do so.
( b ) One of the actions described in paragraph (a) of this section will normally be taken within 60 days after the registration application is received. The Department will also consider requests for faster action that include a full explanation of the need for expedited action.
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Thomas J. Howells, President and Travis T. Jenson, Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: 6/24/2005                          /s/Thomas J. Howells
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Thomas J. Howells
                                         President and director


Date: 6/24/2005                          /s/Travis T. Jenson
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Travis T. Jenson
                                         Secretary and
                                         director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          24,152
<SECURITIES>                                       103
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,290
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,222)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,146
<PP&E>                                          22,615
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           148
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,675
<SALES>                                        126,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,000
<CGS>                                          111,688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,416
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,225)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (257)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,482)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)


</TABLE>