alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.18 DOT decisionmaker. ( a ) *Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs is the DOT decisionmaker. The Assistant Secretary shall have all of the powers set forth in § 302.17(a)(1) and those additional powers delegated by the Secretary. The Assistant Secretary may delegate this authority in appropriate non-hearing cases to subordinate officials.
( b ) *Oral hearing cases assigned to the senior career official.* Carrier selection proceedings for international route authority that are set for oral hearing and such other oral hearing cases as the Secretary deems appropriate will be assigned to the senior career official in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs, who will serve as the DOT decisionmaker. In all such cases, the administrative law judge shall render a recommended decision to the senior career official, who shall have all of the powers set forth in § 302.17(a)(1) and those additional powers delegated by the Secretary. ( 1 ) Decisions of the senior career official are subject to review by, and at the discretion of, the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. Petitions for discretionary review of decisions of the senior career official will not be entertained. A notice of review by the Assistant Secretary will establish the procedures for review. Unless a notice of review is issued, the decision of the senior career official will be issued as a final decision of the Department and will be served fourteen (14) days after it is adopted by the senior career official.
( 2 ) Final decisions of the senior career official may be reviewed upon a petition for reconsideration filed pursuant to § 302.14. Such a petition shall state clearly the basis for requesting reconsideration and shall specify any questions of national transportation policy that may be involved. The Assistant Secretary will either grant or deny the petition.
( 3 ) Upon review or reconsideration, the Assistant Secretary may either affirm the decision or remand the decision to the senior career official for further action consistent with such order of remand.
( 4 ) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section, final decisions of the senior career official will be transmitted to the President of the United States when required under 49 U.S.C. 41307.
( c ) *Secretary and Deputy Secretary.* The Secretary or Deputy Secretary may exercise any authority of the Assistant Secretary whenever he or she believes a decision involves important questions of national transportation policy.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Operation of the National and Federal Reserve Banking Systems

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1913-1970					 and 	Seventy-Third Congress, 1933-1935. 						*Operation of the National and Federal Reserve Banking Systems : Report (To Accompany S. 1631), Calendar No. 79*,										May 15, 1933,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/993,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
1

Werner, Christopher

From: Werner, Christopher

Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 3:13 PM

To: 'Szabo, Aaron'

Cc: Lorang, Phil

Subject: RE: Near-final version of regional haze rule NPRM

Attachments: 03_14_2016 RH NPRM with OMB changes RLSO to preamble and line edits.docx

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Categories: Regional Haze

Aaron, attached please find “near-final” NPRM. Again, there will be changes made by our regulatory specialist, but they 

are likely to be formatting only. 

Chris Werner 

US EPA – Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Air Quality Policy Division 

(919) 541-5133 

werner.christopher@epa.gov

From: Szabo, Aaron [mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 3:06 PM 

To: Werner, Christopher <Werner.Christopher@epa.gov> 

Cc: Lorang, Phil <Lorang.Phil@epa.gov> 

Subject: RE: Near-final version of regional haze rule NPRM 

Chris, 

Please send the “near-final” document now to help facilitate interagency review. Thank you very much.

From: Werner, Christopher [mailto:Werner.Christopher@epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 2:17 PM 

To: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov> 

Cc: Lorang, Phil <Lorang.Phil@epa.gov> 

Subject: Near-final version of regional haze rule NPRM 

Hi Aaron, 

We’ve produced a version of the NPRM incorporating all changes discussed thus far during interagency review, and that 

also includes the changes outlined in the document sent to you Friday (which we assume is being reviewed by the other 

agencies now). The only other changes needed to the NPRM on our end are for our regulatory specialist to review it for 

formatting and related issues. 

Would it be helpful to you to have this “near-final” document now? 

Chris Werner 

US EPA – Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 
2

Air Quality Policy Division 

(919) 541-5133 

werner.christopher@epa.gov
#### § 1250.103 Discrimination prohibited.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arch Chemicals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Michael E. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is provided
solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael E. Campbell
|Michael E. Campbell    
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 5, 2004         



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Arch Chemicals, Inc. and will be retained by Arch Chemicals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 29.1121 General. For powerplant and auxiliary power unit installations the following apply: ( a ) Each exhaust system must ensure safe disposal of exhaust gases without fire hazard or carbon monoxide contamination in any personnel compartment.
( b ) Each exhaust system part with a surface hot enough to ignite flammable fluids or vapors must be located or shielded so that leakage from any system carrying flammable fluids or vapors will not result in a fire caused by impingement of the fluids or vapors on any part of the exhaust system including shields for the exhaust system.
( c ) Each component upon which hot exhaust gases could impinge, or that could be subjected to high temperatures from exhaust system parts, must be fireproof. Each exhaust system component must be separated by a fireproof shield from adjacent parts of the rotorcraft that are outside the engine and auxiliary power unit compartments.
( d ) No exhaust gases may discharge so as to cause a fire hazard with respect to any flammable fluid vent or drain.
( e ) No exhaust gases may discharge where they will cause a glare seriously affecting pilot vision at night.
( f ) Each exhaust system component must be ventilated to prevent points of excessively high temperature.
( g ) Each exhaust shroud must be ventilated or insulated to avoid, during normal operation, a temperature high enough to ignite any flammable fluids or vapors outside the shroud.
( h ) If significant traps exist, each turbine engine exhaust system must have drains discharging clear of the rotorcraft, in any normal ground and flight attitudes, to prevent fuel accumulation after the failure of an attempted engine start.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, 72 Stat. 752, 755, 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423; sec. 6(c), 49 U.S.C. 1655 (c))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 970, Jan. 26, 1968; Amdt. 29-13, 42 FR 15046, Mar. 17, 1977]
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
of M Line Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jitu Banker, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:  May
      18, 2009
              /s/
      Jitu BankerBy:  Jitu
      BankerIts:  Chief
      Financial Officer
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
M Line Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by M Line Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 29.679 Control system locks. If there is a device to lock the control system with the rotorcraft on the ground or water, there must be means to— ( a ) Automatically disengage the lock when the pilot operates the controls in a normal manner, or limit the operation of the rotorcraft so as to give unmistakable warning to the pilot before takeoff; and
( b ) Prevent the lock from engaging in flight.
1 

### Schaeffer, John

From: Lin, Chuantung Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 10:46 AM To: Schaeffer, John Cc: Lewis, Paul; Mattheisen, Mike; Njo, Heather; Brooks , David; Williamson, Tracy; Christian, Myrta Subject: RE: 68187-76-8 HPV2 Physical Chemical study results for Review



### Hi John,

I have reviewed the physical chemicals properties e ndpoints of the test result submitted by the sponso r for
the HPV2 test chemical.

As the sponsor had indicated in the report that the test results for Melting Point (MP = -4 o 

### C) and Boiling Point (BP = 113 o 

### C) for this chemical were most likely obtained for the water content in the test substance. The purity of the test substance was ~74.4% wih water ( 24.3%), Sodium Sulphate (1.25%), and SO3 (5.58%) contents in it. The HPV2 Test Rule requires using a pure substance (~99%) in the testing methods. Ho wever, this HPV2 chemical could not be easily purified to a pure substance for testing and the product is als o sold as it in the commerce, the test results and the test meth ods could be accepted (as the sponsor reported) to fulfill the test requirements for this HPV2 chemical (as lo ng as the purity of the substance are clearly indic ated).

Please let me know if you have any question regardi ng this matter.

Daniel

Daniel (Chuantung) Lin, Ph.D. Chemist, Industrial Chemistry Branch
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics
US EPA 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (7406M) [Deliveries to: 1201 Constitution Ave., NW, EPA Eas t (WJC) 5133E] Washington, DC 20460

202-564-8584 (direct) 202-564-8740 (branch) 202-564-8679 (fax)

From: Schaeffer, John
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 7:54 AM
To: Lin, Chuantung
Cc: Lewis, Paul; Mattheisen, Mike; Njo, Heather; Brook s, David Subject: 68187-76-8 HPV2 Physical Chemical study results fo r Review

Daniel, good morning.

Attached for your review for adequacy are TSCA sect ion 4 study results for sulfated castor oil (CASRN 68187-76-8). The two required studies were for the melting point and boiling point endpoints— the report includes additional information.2 Please let me know when I might anticipate receivin g you review if you think it will go past the end o f this month (October).

Thanks.

John

John Schaeffer Senior Biologist USEPA/OPPT/CCD/CITB 1201 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460 Mail Code: 7405M Phone: 202-564-8173
§ 145.209 Repair station manual contents. A certificated repair station's manual must include the following: ( a ) An organizational chart identifying— ( 1 ) Each management position with authority to act on behalf of the repair station,
( 2 ) The area of responsibility assigned to each management position, and
( 3 ) The duties, responsibilities, and authority of each management position;
( b ) Procedures for maintaining and revising the rosters required by § 145.161;
( c ) A description of the certificated repair station's operations, including the housing, facilities, equipment, and materials as required by subpart C of this part;
( d ) Procedures for— ( 1 ) Revising the capability list provided for in § 145.215 and notifying the responsible Flight Standards office of revisions to the list, including how often the responsible Flight Standards office will be notified of revisions; and
( 2 ) The self-evaluation required under § 145.215(c) for revising the capability list, including methods and frequency of such evaluations, and procedures for reporting the results to the appropriate manager for review and action;
( e ) Procedures for revising the training program required by § 145.163 and submitting revisions to the responsible Flight Standards office for approval;
( f ) Procedures to govern work performed at another location in accordance with § 145.203;
( g ) Procedures for maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations performed under § 145.205;
( h ) Procedures for— ( 1 ) Maintaining and revising the contract maintenance information required by § 145.217(a)(2)(i), including submitting revisions to the responsible Flight Standards office for approval; and
( 2 ) Maintaining and revising the contract maintenance information required by § 145.217(a)(2)(ii) and notifying the responsible Flight Standards office of revisions to this information, including how often the responsible Flight Standards office will be notified of revisions;
( i ) A description of the required records and the recordkeeping system used to obtain, store, and retrieve the required records;
( j ) Procedures for revising the repair station's manual and notifying its responsible Flight Standards office of revisions to the manual, including how often the responsible Flight Standards office will be notified of revisions; and
( k ) A description of the system used to identify and control sections of the repair station manual.
[Docket No. FAA-1999-5836, 66 FR 41117, Aug. 6, 2001, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 145-32, 83 FR 9176, Mar. 5, 2018]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements contained in Item 1 of Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
Figures are rounded to the nearest 100,000 (except EPS).
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    131,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               391,400
<PP&E>                                         869,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 545,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 798,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          218,200
<BONDS>                                         75,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     441,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   798,400
<SALES>                                        493,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               493,900
<CGS>                                          352,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  352,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                89,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.48


</TABLE>
### STATE OF MISSOURI FORM OGC-5 

### MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROGRAM 

## WELL COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT AND WELL LOG

NEW WELL WORKOVER DEEPEN PLUG BACK INJECTION SAME RESERVOIR DIFFERENT RESERVOIR OIL GAS DRY

OWNER ADDRESS

LEASE NAME WELL NUMBER

LOCATION OF WELL SEC TWN RNG OR BLOCK AND SURVEY

Sec. Twp North, Rng East West OR ft. from North South ft. from East West LATITUDE LONGITUDE

COUNTY PERMIT NUMBER (OGC-3 OR OGC-31)

DATE SPUDDED DATE TOTAL DEPTH REACHED DATE COMPLETED READY TO
PRODUCE OR INJECT ELEVATION (DF, RKR, RT, OR Gr.)

FEET ELEVATION OF CASING HD.

FLANGE

FEET

TOTAL DEPTH PLUG BACK TOTAL DEPTH

PRODUCING OR INJECTION INTER VAL(S) FOR THIS COMPLETION ROTARY TOOLS USED (INTERVAL)

TO

DRILLING FLUID USED CABLE TOOLS USED (INTERVAL)

WAS THIS WELL DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED?



## Yes No WAS DIRECTIONAL SURVEY MADE?



## Yes No WAS COPY OF DIRECTIONAL SURVEY FILED?



## Yes No DATE FILED

TYPE OF ELECTRICAL OR OTHER LOGS RUN (JUST LOGS FILED WITH THE STATE GEOLOGIST) DATE FILED



### CASING RECORD

CASING (REPORT ALL STRINGS SET IN WELL – CONDUCTOR, SURFACE, INTERMEDIATE, PRODUCING, ETC.

PURPOSE SIZE HOLE DRILLED SIZE CA SING SET WEIGHT (LB. FT) DEPT H SET SACKS CEMENT AMOUNT PULLED



### TUBING RECORD LINER RECORD

SIZE

INCH DEPTH SET

FEET PACKER SET AT

FEET SIZE

INCH TOP

FEET BOTTOM

FEET SACKS CEMENT SCREEN

FEET 

### PERFORATION RECORD ACID, SHOT, FRACTURE, CEMENT SQUEEZE RECORD

NUMBER PER FEET SIZE AN D TYPE DEPTH INTERVAL AMOUNT AND KIND OF

MATERIAL USED DEPTH INTERVAL



### INITIAL PRODUCTION

DATE OF FIRST PRODUCTION OR INJECTION PRODUCING METHOD (INDICATE IF FLOWING, GAS LIFT, OR PUMPING – IF PUMPING, SHOW SIZE AND TYPE OF PUMP.)

DATE OF TEST HOURS TESTED CHOKE SIZE OIL PRODUCED DURING
TEST

BBLS GAS PRODUCED DURING TEST

MCF WATER PRODUCED DURING
TEST

BBLS OIL GRAVITY

API (CORR.)

TUBING PRESSURE CASING PRESSURE CALCULATED RATE OF
PRODUCTION PER 24 HOURS OIL

BBLS GAS

MCF WATER

BBLS GAS OIL RATIO

DISPOSITION OF GAS (STATE WHETHER VENTED, USED FOR FUEL OR SOLD)

METHOD OF DISPOSAL OF MUD PIT CONTENTS



### CERTIFICATE: I, the Undersigned, state that I am the of the (Company), and that I am authorized by said company to make this report, and that this report was prepared under my supervision and direction and that the facts stated therein are true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge.

DATE SIGNATURE

MO 780-0215 (8-06) REMIT TWO (2) COPIES TO: GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROGRAM, PO BOX 250, ROLLA, MO 65402 (573) 368-2143. (REV 8-06)ONE (1) COPY TO BE RETURNED.



### INSTRUCTIONS: Attach drillers log or other acceptable log of well.

* Show all important zones of porosity, detail of all cores, and all drill-stem tests, including depth interval tested, cushion used, time tool open, flowing and shut-in pressures, and recoveries.

DETAIL OF FORMATIONS PENETRATED

FORMATION TOP BOTTOM DESCRIPTION (SEE * ABOVE)

MO 780-0215 (8-06)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1150 

KA 12-00855 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBIN HARVEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF

COUNSEL), FOR APPELLANT. 

REBECCA L. WITTMAN, UTICA, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Barry

M. Donalty, A.J.), dated September 14, 2011. The order granted that

part of the motion of defendant to suppress certain physical evidence. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed.

Same Memorandum as in People v Weathers (___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 16,

2012]).

Entered: November 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court