alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, David O. Cole, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the periodic report, to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC upon request.







Date:  October 19, 2009



By: /s/ David O. Cole





David O. Cole





Chief Financial Officer
§ 29.1337 Powerplant instruments. ( a ) *Instruments and instrument lines.* ( 1 ) Each powerplant and auxiliary power unit instrument line must meet the requirements of §§ 29.993 and 29.1183.
( 2 ) Each line carrying flammable fluids under pressure must— ( i ) Have restricting orifices or other safety devices at the source of pressure to prevent the escape of excessive fluid if the line fails; and
( ii ) Be installed and located so that the escape of fluids would not create a hazard.
( 3 ) Each powerplant and auxiliary power unit instrument that utilizes flammable fluids must be installed and located so that the escape of fluid would not create a hazard.
( b ) *Fuel quantity indicator.* There must be means to indicate to the flight crew members the quantity, in gallons or equivalent units, of usable fuel in each tank during flight. In addition— ( 1 ) Each fuel quantity indicator must be calibrated to read “zero” during level flight when the quantity of fuel remaining in the tank is equal to the unusable fuel supply determined under § 29.959;
( 2 ) When two or more tanks are closely interconnected by a gravity feed system and vented, and when it is impossible to feed from each tank separately, at least one fuel quantity indicator must be installed;
( 3 ) Tanks with interconnected outlets and airspaces may be treated as one tank and need not have separate indicators; and
( 4 ) Each exposed sight gauge used as a fuel quantity indicator must be protected against damage.
( c ) *Fuel flowmeter system.* If a fuel flowmeter system is installed, each metering component must have a means for bypassing the fuel supply if malfunction of that component severely restricts fuel flow.
( d ) *Oil quantity indicator.* There must be a stick gauge or equivalent means to indicate the quantity of oil— ( 1 ) In each tank; and
( 2 ) In each transmission gearbox.
( e ) Rotor drive system transmissions and gearboxes utilizing ferromagnetic materials must be equipped with chip detectors designed to indicate the presence of ferromagnetic particles resulting from damage or excessive wear within the transmission or gearbox. Each chip detector must— ( 1 ) Be designed to provide a signal to the indicator required by § 29.1305(a)(22); and
( 2 ) Be provided with a means to allow crewmembers to check, in flight, the function of each detector electrical circuit and signal.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, 72 Stat. 759, 775, 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423; sec. 6(c), 49 U.S.C. 1655(c))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-13, 42 FR 15047, Mar. 17, 1977; Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34219, Sept. 2, 1988]
§ 29.619 Special factors. ( a ) The special factors prescribed in §§ 29.621 through 29.625 apply to each part of the structure whose strength is— ( 1 ) Uncertain;
( 2 ) Likely to deteriorate in service before normal replacement; or
( 3 ) Subject to appreciable variability due to— ( i ) Uncertainties in manufacturing processes; or
( ii ) Uncertainties in inspection methods.
( b ) For each part of the rotorcraft to which §§ 29.621 through 29.625 apply, the factor of safety prescribed in § 29.303 must be multiplied by a special factor equal to— ( 1 ) The applicable special factors prescribed in §§ 29.621 through 29.625; or
( 2 ) Any other factor great enough to ensure that the probability of the part being understrength because of the uncertainties specified in paragraph (a) of this section is extremely remote.
#### SMYER v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 1, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. A. H. Alston.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

There is no error in the record, and the time for signing bill of exceptions having passed, the cause is affirmed.
OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS /’ 

## AUSTIN

## it rotid b8 2romr r0r 

### the 

## orriaials to in8tmm

pToSeelltloa8

ror treap888lng.Yoursverytruly
Iamamb APPROVEDm 21, l%jg $+-u?$-- ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
**t~r'p'T** 

## Or. ut. . ,), : ,**~** , : l \ .,

.**,i,~** The HonorableRayl!.aHdod United States Department ofTransportation 1200New'lersey Avenue, SE
. :, Washitigton, DC' 20590 I',

Dear Secretary LaHood:

... ,onbehalfQf Deloitte Touche Tohmatsll LLP, I alll. WT!!itig to express our**str0l!g~.** support for the application ofDelta Air Lities for new nonstop service between Seattle and Haneda, Tokyo International Airport. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are many Japanese companies located iti Washitigton, and hundreds more whose business models rely on access to Japan and it's market. The growth ofour busitiess ties with Japan has created demand fOD increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the convenience: offlyitig' into Takyo's downtown Haneda airport. j '.1 (Seattle is proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as airports that can support trans-pacific routes. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our travelers. Thank you for consideration ofthis request. Sincerely,
Name: Hiroyasu Kikuchi Title: Japanese Services Group, Audit Manager Company: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLP Date: 

# ...)..3 I 

# Mttrolt.,**~()** I () Signature:

# fI,'~Vv**~lf..u~**
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of Critical Path, Inc.:

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-87553, 333-95279, 333-95933,
333-36228, 333-40476, 333-44418, 333-51504, 333-63080, 333-81776, 333-123861) of Critical Path, Inc. of our report dated March 28, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP

San Francisco, California

March 28, 2008
# Official Journal C 427I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 427I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6219 December 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 427I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6219 December 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 427 I/01 | Call for applications for the ‘Jan Amos Comenius Prize for high-quality teaching about the European Union’ | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2019/C 427 I/01

Call for applications for the ‘Jan Amos Comenius Prize for high-quality teaching about the European Union’

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

AMENDED* Transmittal of Record to the Court of Appeals

DATE: August 31, 2018 

BK Related Case: 17-3283 LTS (PROMESA) 

Prior USCA Case #: N/A

 

APPEAL FEE PAID: YES X _ NO 

 

CASE CAPTION: In Re: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS: YES NO X 

MOTIONS PENDING: YES NO X _ 

 

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY AAA PORTFOLIO BOND FUND INC, Puerto Rico AAA 

Portfolio Bond Fund II, Inc, Puerto Rico AAA Portfolio Target Maturity Fund, Inc., Puerto Rico 

Fixed Income Fund II, Inc., Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund III, Inc., Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund 

IV, Inc., Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc., Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund, Inc., Puerto Rico 

GNMA & U.S. Government Target Maturity Fund, Inc., Puerto Rico Investors Bond Fund I, Puerto 

Rico Investors Tax-Free Fund III, Inc., Puerto Rico Investors Tax-Free Fund IV, Inc., Puerto Rico 

Investors Tax-Free Fund V, Inc., Puerto Rico Investors Tax-Free Fund VI, Inc., Puerto Rico Investors 

Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Puerto Rico Investors Tax-Free Fund, Inc. II, Puerto Rico Mortgage-Backed 

&U.S Government Securities Fund, Inc., Tax-Free Puerto Rico Fund II, Inc., Tax-Free Puerto Rico 

Fund, Inc., Tax-Free Puerto Rico Target Maturity Fund, Inc. 

 

APPEAL FROM: Order entered on 8/21/2018. 

 

SPECIAL COMMENTS: Copies of original documents. 

 *Amended ROA at docket 3844 to reflect changes on payment and filers. 

INDEX OF DOCUMENTS INCLUDED AS THE RECORD ON APPEAL: 

DOCUMENTS: 

 VOLUMES: 

Docket Entries 3834, 3793 & 3418 I 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed documents contained herein are copies or the original pleadings as 

described above and constitute the record on appeal in the case. 

 

 FRANCES RIOS DE MORAN 

 Clerk of the Court 

 S/ Marian B. Ramirez-Rivera 

 Marian B. Ramirez-Rivera 

 Deputy Clerk 

Acknowledgment of Receipt: 

Received By: ________________ 

USCCA #: ________________ s/c: CM/ECF Parties, Appeals Clerk

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3846 Filed:08/31/18 Entered:08/31/18 17:14:32 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
##### 





EXHIBIT 99(b)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Alan S. Dawes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.



| |                                              
| | ---------------------------------------------
| | /s/ ALAN S. DAWES                            
| |                                              
| | Alan S. Dawes                                
| | Vice Chairman and Chief Financial
    Officer

July 17, 2003
**EXHIBIT 31(A)**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Leo H. Suggs, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of Overnite Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 Section III.E.] 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 26, 2004
Exhibit 32.1


                   CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO SECTION 906
                   OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  Meridian  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period  ending  June 30,  2005  as  filed
with   the   Securities   and   Exchange   Commission   on    the   date  hereof
(the "Report"),   we,  Anthony  C.  Dike, the  Chief  Executive Officer, of  the
Company,  certify,  pursuant   to   18 U.S.C.   1350,  as   adopted  pursuant to
Section   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section 13(a) or
     15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original  of this written  statement  required  by Section 906,
or other  document  authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this  written  statement  required by Section 906, has  been  provided to
Meridian Holdings, Inc., and  will  be retained  by   Meridian  Holdings,
Inc.,  and furnished to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.


DATE:  August 14,   2005        By:  /s/  Anthony  C.  Dike
                                        -------------------
                                         Anthony  C.  Dike
                                        Chairman  and  CEO
§ 25.1461 Equipment containing high energy rotors. ( a ) Equipment containing high energy rotors must meet paragraph (b), (c), or (d) of this section.
( b ) High energy rotors contained in equipment must be able to withstand damage caused by malfunctions, vibration, abnormal speeds, and abnormal temperatures. In addition— ( 1 ) Auxiliary rotor cases must be able to contain damage caused by the failure of high energy rotor blades; and
( 2 ) Equipment control devices, systems, and instrumentation must reasonably ensure that no operating limitations affecting the integrity of high energy rotors will be exceeded in service.
( c ) It must be shown by test that equipment containing high energy rotors can contain any failure of a high energy rotor that occurs at the highest speed obtainable with the normal speed control devices inoperative.
( d ) Equipment containing high energy rotors must be located where rotor failure will neither endanger the occupants nor adversely affect continued safe flight.
[Amdt. 25-41, 42 FR 36971, July 18, 1977]
§ 29.681 Limit load static tests. ( a ) Compliance with the limit load requirements of this part must be shown by tests in which— ( 1 ) The direction of the test loads produces the most severe loading in the control system; and
( 2 ) Each fitting, pulley, and bracket used in attaching the system to the main structure is included;
( b ) Compliance must be shown (by analyses or individual load tests) with the special factor requirements for control system joints subject to angular motion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense Education Benefits Board of Actuaries.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        A meeting of the board has been schedule to execute the provisions of Chapter 101, Title 10, United States Code (10 U.S.C. 2006*et. seq.*). The Board shall review DoD actuarial methods and assumptions to be used in the valuation of the G.I. Bill. Persons desiring to: (1) Attend the DoD Education Benefits Board of Actuaries meeting or, (2) make an oral presentation or submit a written statement for consideration at the meeting must notify Wendie Powell at (703) 696-7400 by July 24, 2000.                    

Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

# DATES:

August 4, 2000, 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The Pentagon, Room 1E801—Room 5.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher Doyle, Chief Actuary, DoD Office of the Actuary, 1555 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22209-2405, (703) 696-7407.

Dated: April 25, 2000.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-11191  Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### STEPHENS v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 1, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. Wm. E. Fort.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and P. W. Turner, Assistant Attorney General,- for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

Appeal dismissed on authority of *Sanders v. State, infra,*70 South. 949.
# Jurnalul Oficial C 68A/2011

| | ISSN 1830-3668
  doi:10.3000/18303668.CA2011.068.rom |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 68A |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 543 martie 2011 |

ISSN 1830-3668

doi:10.3000/18303668.CA2011.068.rom

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 68A

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 543 martie 2011

---

| Informarea nr. | Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rectificări |
| 2011/C 068A/01 | Rectificare la anunțul de concurs general EPSO/AST/112/10 — Asistenți (AST 3) (JO C 341 A, 16.12.2010) | 1 |

Informarea nr.

Cuprins

Pagina

Rectificări

2011/C 068A/01

Rectificare la anunțul de concurs general EPSO/AST/112/10 — Asistenți (AST 3) (JO C 341 A, 16.12.2010)

(JO C 341 A, 16.12.2010)

1

LISTA JURNALELOR OFICIALE, SERIA C A, CONCURSURI

În continuare se găsește lista Jurnalelor Oficiale din seria C A care au fost publicate în anul în curs.

Dacă nu există mențiuni speciale, Jurnalele Oficiale s-au publicat în toate versiunile lingvistice.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

Rectificări

| 3.3.2011 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CA 68/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2011

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CA 68/1

---

Rectificare la anunțul de concurs general EPSO/AST/112/10 — Asistenți (AST 3)

(
  Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene C 341 A din 16 decembrie 2010
  )

(2011/C 68 A/01)

La pagina 3, la titlul IV.2:

în loc de:

| „Testul (d) | capacități profesionale:


  exactitate și precizie | punctaj: 0-20 puncte


  punctaj minim obligatoriu: 10 puncte |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Testul (e) | capacități profesionale:


  ierarhizarea priorităților și organizare | punctaj: 0-20 puncte


  punctaj minim obligatoriu: 10 puncte”, |

„Testul (d)

capacități profesionale:

exactitate și precizie

punctaj: 0-20 puncte

punctaj minim obligatoriu: 10 puncte

Testul (e)

capacități profesionale:

ierarhizarea priorităților și organizare

punctaj: 0-20 puncte

punctaj minim obligatoriu: 10 puncte”,

se va citi:

| „Testul (d) | capacități profesionale:


  exactitate și precizie | punctaj: 0-20 puncte |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Testul (e) | capacități profesionale:


  ierarhizarea priorităților și organizare | punctaj: 0-20 puncte |
| | Punctajul minim obligatoriu este de 20 puncte pentru testele (d) și (e) luate împreună.” |

„Testul (d)

capacități profesionale:

exactitate și precizie

punctaj: 0-20 puncte

Testul (e)

capacități profesionale:

ierarhizarea priorităților și organizare

punctaj: 0-20 puncte

Punctajul minim obligatoriu este de 20 puncte pentru testele (d) și (e) luate împreună.”

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-88375) pertaining to the ITXC Corp. Employee Stock Purchase
Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-93613) pertaining to the ITXC Corp. 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan of our report dated February 7, 2000 (except for Note 16, as to
which the date is March 15, 2000), with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of ITXC Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1999.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


MetroPark, New Jersey
March 28, 2000