alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charles Conahan *v.*Thomas Cullin.

(No. 6,421.)

A person or corporation to be served as garnishee must be within the county in which the order of attachment is executed. It is not sufficient to serve the agent of a corporation, located elsewhere, but doing business by an agency in the county in which the action is brought.

Special Term. — T'his was an action to recover $411.49 upon a promissory note, and upon a judgment; an order of attachment had been issued and garnishees served with process.

A motion was made for a rule against the City Insurance Company, of Cincinnati, and the Washington Union Insurance Company, of Cleveland, to show cause why an attachment should not issue to compel answers to the interrogatories filed against them as garnishees. The order of attachment was directed to the sheriff’ of Hamilton county. The return was, “Served the City Insurance Company, of the city of Cincinnati, garnishee, by leaving a copy of this writ and notice with N. Gregory, secretary of said company, personally, and the Washington Union Insurance Company, of the city of Cleveland, garnishee, by leaving a copy of *2this writ and notice with George *W.*Copelan, agent for said company, personally.”

*G. H. Hilton,*for plaintiff.

*Heynes, Todd & Lytle,*for defendants.

Gholson, J.

A person or corporation to be served as garnishee must be within the county in which the order of attachment is executed. The provision for the service of garnishees does not, like that for the service of a summons, allow service on the agent of an insurance company located elsewhere, but doing business, by an agency, in the county in which the action is brought.

To authorize a service on the Cleveland company, an order of attachment should be issued to the county of Cuyahoga. The same reason which would allow an action to be brought against an insurance company in the county in which it has an agency, does not apply to the service of an order of attachment. The provisions of the code on the subject are different. Code, secs. 67, 200, 201.

The motion as to the first named company, granted; as to the second, overruled.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Lanbo Financial  Group,  Inc. (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-KSB for the quarter  period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Pingji Lu,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive  Officer of the  Registrant,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant as of and for the period covered by the Report.

      Pursuant  to the rules and  regulations  of the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.


                                            /s/ Pingji Lu
                                            -----------------------
                                            Pingji Lu
March 31, 2005                              Chairman of the Board and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(S-3 No. 333-51204) of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. and in the related
Prospectus, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-84081) pertaining
to the WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the
WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43562) pertaining to the 2000 Stock
Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-51196)
pertaining to the 2000 Qiave Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 26,
2001 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle Washington
March 26, 2001
#### § 1310.4 Offices.

The principal offices of the Board are at 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., Suite 970, Washington, DC 20005.
§ 1261.602 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: ( a ) *Agency* means: ( 1 ) An Executive agency as defined in section 105 of title 5, United States Code, including U.S. Postal Service and the U.S. Postal Rate Commission;
( 2 ) A military department as defined in section 102 of Title 5, United States Code;
( 3 ) An agency or court in the judicial branch, including a court as defined in section 610 of Title 28, United States Code, the District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation;
( 4 ) An agency of the legislative branch, including the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives; and
( 5 ) Other independent establishments that are entities of the Federal Government.
( b ) *Creditor agency* means the agency to which the debt is owed.
( c ) *Debt* means an amount owed to the United States from sources which include loans insured or guaranteed by the United States and all other amounts due the United States from fees, leases, rents, royalties, services, sales of real or personal property, overpayments, penalties, damages, interest, fines and forfeitures (except those arising under the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and all other similar sources.
( d ) *Disposable pay* means that part of current basic pay, special pay, incentive pay, retired pay, retainer pay, or in the case of an employee not entitled to basic pay, other authorized pay remaining after the deduction of any amount required by law to be withheld. NASA must exclude deductions listed in OPM's garnishment regulations at 5 CFR 581.105 (b) through (f) to determine disposable pay subject to salary offset.
( e ) *Employee* means a current employee of an agency, including a current member of the Armed Forces or a Reserve of the Armed Forces (Reserves).
( f ) *Paying agency* means the agency employing the individual and authorizing the payment of his or her current pay.
( g ) *Salary offset* means an administrative offset to collect a debt under 5 U.S.C. 5514 by deduction(s) at one or more officially established pay intervals from the current pay account of an employee without his or her consent.
( h ) *Waiver* means the cancellation, remission, forgiveness, or nonrecovery of a debt allegedly owed by an employee to an agency as permitted or required by 5 U.S.C. 8346(b), or any other law.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7330

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. BILLY WAYNE GREGORY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 4:15

- cr - 00263

- RBH

- 5; 4:17

- cv - 00202

- RBH )

Submitted : April 17 , 2018 Decided: April 19, 2018

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Billy Wayne Gregory, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Billy Wayne Gregory seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the de nial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the consti tutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositi ve procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gregory has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Gregory’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
の

                      偏
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K/A FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          49,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                       239
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,353
<PP&E>                                          11,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           243
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,079
<SALES>                                         22,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,372
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,726)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,444)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,444)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,444)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)
        

</TABLE>
§ 250.7 Provision to implement the Transparency Improvements and Compensation to Keep Every Ticketholder Safe Act of 2018. ( a ) *Boarded passengers.* A covered air carrier may not deny a revenue passenger traveling on a confirmed reservation permission to board, or involuntarily remove that passenger from the aircraft, once a revenue passenger has: ( 1 ) Checked in for the flight prior to the check-in deadline; and
( 2 ) Had their ticket or boarding pass collected or electronically scanned and accepted by the gate agent.
( b ) *Limitations.* The prohibition pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply when: ( 1 ) There is a safety, security, or health risk with respect to that revenue passenger or there is a safety or security issue requiring removal of a revenue passenger; or
( 2 ) The revenue passenger is engaging in behavior that is obscene, disruptive, or otherwise unlawful.
( c ) *Rule of construction.* Nothing in this section may be construed to limit or otherwise affect the responsibility or authority of a pilot in command of an aircraft under 14 CFR 121.533, or limit any penalty under section 46504 of title 49, United States Code.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2020-0251, 86 FR 2538, Jan. 13, 2021]
### SERVED : DECEMBE R20 , 201 1 U.S . DI-,PARTMENT O FTRANSPORTATIO N /A^'^K^IJ^ ^



### OM'lC hO Fl-lhARlNG S .r.r-'...r j OPFRVfir'''' ^ WASHINGTON , D C ' '"' ' " ^ '" " ^-"^"'^"^''''

^ Zui i Ct C 2 0 P 2 : 5 3 1NTHBMA1T12R0 F 

### IV Y IZNTBRPRISESJNC . •A A DOCKE T NO . [T O Bl : ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penall y Action ) FDMSNO . rAA-2011-111 6 NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (herclofore designate da s Cas e No . 20I0SO700376 ) ha s bee n assigne dto Administrativ e La

w Judg e J.E . Sullivan . All futur e pleading s andother

communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA

A Hearin g Docket. , andthe other person s on the attache dServic e List .

Attachmen t

- Servic e List

Chie f

Administrativ e Law^

J udgtFDMSNo . FAA-20I1-III 6 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC^3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2WIO00 '

ON ECOP Y Alexande r

G . Bateman , ir.^.Responden i '. v Counse l Ruski n Mosco u Faltische k P.C . 142 5 RX RPlaz a Eas t Tower , 15t

hFloo r UniondalcN Y 11556-142 5 TEL : 516-663-658 9 FAX : 516-663-678 9 Jeanin e C . Gotimer , Complainanl.' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Easter n Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-327 2 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e J.E . Sullivan , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

Service wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier, use th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Adminislralion , 60

0 independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Altention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC^30 .

- 7 -
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Foreign Agricultural Service

# AGENCY:

Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given that the third meeting of the Advisory Committee on Emerging Markets will be held May 17, 2000. The role of the committee is to provide information and advice, based upon knowledge and expertise of the members, useful to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in implementing the Emerging Markets Program. The committee will also advise USDA on ways to increase the involvement of the U.S. private sector in cooperative work with emerging markets in food and rural business systems and review proposals submitted to the Program.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, May 17, 2000, from 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of this meeting is to review and discuss those proposals the Emerging Markets Office has received which may qualify for Emerging Markets Program funding. The minutes of the meeting announced in this Notice shall be available for review. The meeting is open to the public and members of the public may provide comments in writing to Douglas Freeman, Foreign Agricultural Service, Room 6506 South Building, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 14th and Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20250, but should not make any oral comments at the meeting unless invited to do so by the Co-chairpersons.

Signed at Washington, DC, May 3, 2000.

Timothy J. Galvin,

Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.

[FR Doc. 00-11559  Filed 5-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-10-M
EXHIBIT 32.1-Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
             906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the filing of Australian-Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Ely Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350), that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The  information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of
       operations of the Company.


Dated:   April 14, 2004


 /s/ ELY SAKHAI
--------------------------
Ely Sakhai, President and
Chief  Executive Officer






                            Exhibit 32.1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Bank Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
A. Beck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects,  the financial  condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



/s/ James A. Beck
-------------------------
James A. Beck
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002

                                     - 22 -
FORM 10-Q

               RAYTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                             PART II

                            EXHIBIT 11

            SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
             (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                      
                                                 For the Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                                 March 30,          March 31
                                                   1997               1996   

<S>                                           <C>                  <C>

Net income as reported                         $    4,282           $    3,691 

Primary

Common shares outstanding at
  beginning of year                             3,239,762            3,230,080
Weighted average of stock options
  exercised                                         7,066                  -  
Weighted average of treasury
  stock acquired                                      -                    -  
Common equivalent shares
  for assumed exercise of
  employee stock options                          275,627              142,494
Weighted average number of shares
  used in calculation of primary
  income per share                              3,522,455            3,372,574

Primary income per common share                     $1.22                $1.09 






Fully Diluted
     
Common shares outstanding                               
  at beginning of year                          3,239,762            3,230,080
Weighted average of stock options
  exercised                                         7,066                  -
Weighted average of treasury
  stock acquired                                      -                    -
Common equivalent shares for
  assumed exercise of employee
  stock options                                   288,726              158,111
Weighted average number of shares 
  used in calculation of fully 
  diluted earnings per share                    3,535,554            3,388,191

Fully diluted earnings per share                    $1.21                $1.09
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                              United States Code)


     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form
10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




         Dated: March 30, 2005          /s/ Yaron Meerfeld
                                        ------------------
                                        Yaron Meerfeld, Chief Executive Officer


         Dated: March 30, 2005          /s/ Eyal Bigon
                                        --------------
                                        Eyal Bigon, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.