alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4039 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4039

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
 permissible first-dollar coverage of telehealth services for purposes 
                      of health savings accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 23, 2020

 Mrs. Loeffler introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
 permissible first-dollar coverage of telehealth services for purposes 
                      of health savings accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Telemedicine Everywhere Lifting 
Everyone's Healthcare Experience And Long Term Health HSA Act of 2020'' 
or the ``TELEHEALTH HSA Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXEMPTION FOR TELEHEALTH SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 223(c)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``In the case of 
plan years beginning on or before December 31, 2021, a plan'' and 
inserting ``A plan''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Clause (ii) of section 223(c)(1)(B) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``(in the case 
of plan years beginning on or before December 31, 2021)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to plan years beginning after December 31, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25825]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Washington Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a meeting of the Washington 
Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene by 
conference call at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time on Wednesday, November 19, 
2014. The purpose of the meeting is for the Committee to discuss 
administrative matters and its project on equal education opportunity.
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: 877-446-3914, conference ID: 2161251. Any 
interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the 
meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls they initiate 
over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund any incurred 
charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over 
land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. Persons with 
hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling 
the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service 
with the conference call number and conference ID number.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by December 19, 2014. 
The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Western Regional 
Office, 300 North Los Angeles St., Suite 2010, Los Angeles, CA, 90012. 
Comments may be emailed to atrevino@usccr.gov.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western Regional Office at the above 
email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated: October 23, 2014.
David Mussatt,
 Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-25825 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
#### § 29.1565 Tail rotor.

Each tail rotor must be marked so that its disc is conspicuous under normal daylight ground conditions.

[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 971, Jan. 26, 1968]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OMI Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kathleen
C. Haines, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   |  |                                                                                                                                                    

|Date: March 15, 2006 | By:/s/Kathleen C. Haines
|-------------------- | ------------------------
|                     | Kathleen C. Haines      
|                     | Senior Vice President,  
|                     | Chief Financial Officer 
|                     | and Treasurer           





A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OMI Corporation and will be retained by OMI Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

---
#### UNITED STATES v. ERNEST C. WHITBECK, RECEIVER

[77 C.Cls. 309; 290 U.S. 671]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court. October 16, 1933.
AFS-12-207-E March 8, 2012

Exemption No. 10470 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0128

Ms. Anne W. Shiff Parent of Harry A. Shiff

3810 East Calle Cortez Tuscon, AZ 85716

Dear Ms. Shiff:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received January 31, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Harry A. Shiff for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Mr. Shiff to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Mr. Shiff.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Mr. Shiff exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Mr. Shiff is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Mr. Shiff to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S.

aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Mr. Shiff’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Mr. Shiff may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Mr. Shiff’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosures
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use in this Annual Report [Form 40-F] of CGI Group Inc. [the Company] of our report dated
November 9, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 included herein and our report dated November 9, 2011 with respect to the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements [Form S-8 Nos. 333-112021, 333-13350, 333-66044, 333-74932, 333-146175 and 333-177013] pertaining to the Companys stock option plans of our reports dated November 9, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of the Company as of and for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 included herein and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011.



|                  |  |                      
|----------------- |  | ---------------------
|                  |  | (Signed)             
|Montréal, Canada  |  | Ernst & Young LLP    
|December 22, 2011 |  | Chartered Accountants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  x  

  : 

In re:  :  

  : 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND  : PROMESA 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,  : Title III 

  : 

  as representative of  : Case No. 17‐BK‐3283 (LTS) 

  : 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,  : (Jointly Administered) 

  : 

Debtors.1

  : 

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  x  

ORDER  

This matter is before the Court on the Status Report of the Oversight Board Addressing 

the Court’s Directive in its June 7, 2018 Order (Dkt. No. 3302) (the “Status Report”).  The Status 

Report was filed under seal pursuant to this Court’s order dated June 13, 2018 (Dkt. No. 3298).  

This Court’s order restricts access differently with regard to separate exhibits to the Status 

Report.  In order for the clerk to apply the appropriate restrictions, each exhibit must be filed as 

separate documents within one CM/ECF event.  Accordingly, the Financial Oversight and 

 

1

  The Debtors in these title III cases, along with each Debtor’s respective title III case number listed as a 

bankruptcy case number due to software limitations and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s 

federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy 

Case No. 17‐BK‐3283 (LTS)) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481), (ii) Employees Retirement 

System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17‐BK‐

3566(LTS)) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686), (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation 

Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17‐BK‐3567 (LTS)) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808), 

and (iv) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17‐BK‐3284 

(LTS)) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); and  (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 

(“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3310 Filed:06/18/18 Entered:06/18/18 09:50:08 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 

Management Board for Puerto Rico is instructed to resubmit the Status Report in accordance 

with the instructions to be provided by the clerk.  

SO ORDERED.           

/ s / Judith Gail Dein               

Judith Gail Dein 

              United States Magistrate Judge  

DATED: June 15, 2018 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3310 Filed:06/18/18 Entered:06/18/18 09:50:08 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### MARTINEZ v STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 86-0035AC10 (Lower Court Case No. 85-27936MM10)

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County

September 20, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

James O. Walker, III, Esquire, for appellant.

Lewis Michael, Assistant State Attorney, for appellee.

Before STANTON S. KAPLAN, Circuit Judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Appellant’s appeal of the lower court’s denial of Defendant’s Motion for Rehearing dated March 21, 1986.

Appellant was arrested and charged with Careless Driving and Driving or being in Actual Physical Control of a Motor Vehicle While *37Under the Influence of Alcoholic Beverages on December 24, 1985. Defendant refused to submit to a breath test as requested by the officer after Appellant was advised of implied consent requirements.

Pursuant to Florida Statute 322.261, Appellant moved for a hearing on February 10, 1986 after being advised of the suspension of his driving privileges. The lower court heard the motion on February 28, 1986. The State presented the arresting/investigating officer over the objection of the Defendant. Thereafter the lower court suspended Appellant’s drivers license and denied the Defendant’s Motion for Rehearing.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal and the State moved to dismiss said appeal. This Court ruled that the improvidently taken appeal would be treated as a petition for Writ of Certiorari in an order dated April 27, 1990.

The issue presented before this Court is whether or not the lower court erred in suspending defendant’s drivers license based solely on hearsay testimony to establish whether the officer had reasonable cause to believe the Appellant was driving under the influence.

In hearings arising under F.S. 322.261, a “reasonable cause” standard is required. As Appellee correctly points out, the reasonable cause standard is not equivalent to the probable cause standard or beyond a reasonable doubt standard.

This is not required in proceedings such as those subject to review in the case at bar. Therefore, the cases cited by Appellant are all distinguishable in that convictions or liberty interests are involved.

The officer’s “reasonable cause” to believe the suspect was driving under the influence is one of several factors the officer must swear to in order to have the suspect’s driver’s license suspended. Hearsay may be used by the officer to formulate reasonable cause even if the same hearsay could not be used to establish probable cause or beyond a reasonable doubt.

The argument presented by the Appellant is not persuasive as all the cases cited by Appellant are distinguishable. They do not deal with the “reasonable cause” standard, but rather a stricter standard.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the lower court’s denial of Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing as well as the lower court’s ruling on the merits is AFFIRMED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at Broward County Courthouse, 201 S.E. 6th Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 20th day of September, 1991.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, B. Grant Yarber,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, to my knowledge that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ B. Grant Yarber
---------------------------
B. Grant Yarber
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2005

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed  "filed" by the Company for  purposes of Section
18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  as  amended,  and  shall  not be
incorporated  by reference  into any filing of the Company under the  Securities
Act of 1933,  as amended,  or the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether  made  before  or after  the date of this  Report,  irrespective  of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      -34-
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24959]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2013-OS-0207]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, 
the following proposal for collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by November 
20, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Licari, 571-372-0493.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title, Associated Form and OMB Number: 
Defense Acquisition University, Student Information System (SIS); OMB 
Control Number 0704-TBD.
    Type of Request: New.
    Number of Respondents: 7,600.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 7,600.
    Average Burden per Response: 5 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 633.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to permit an individual to register for a DAU training course. The 
information is used to evaluate the individual's eligibility for a 
course and to notify the individual of approval or disapproval of the 
request. It is also used to notify the training facility of assignments 
to classes, for training schedule analysis and forecasts, cost 
analysis, budget estimates, and financial planning.
    Affected Public: Individuals and Households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of 
Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Frederick Licari.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Licari at WHS/ESD Directives Division, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: October 16, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014-24959 Filed 10-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Lawrence  A.  Consalvi,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Gateway  International
Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005,  fully complies with the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d))  and that  information  contained  in this  Quarterly
Report on Form  10-QSB  for the  fiscal  quarter  ended  June 30,  2005,  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Gateway International Holdings, Inc.

By: /s/ Lawrence A. Consalvi
    -----------------------------
Name:   Lawrence A. Consalvi
Title:  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date:   August 15, 2005