alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 300.3 Reporting of communications. ( a ) *General.* The following types of substantive communication shall be reported as specified in paragraph (b) of this section: ( 1 ) Any communication in violation of § 300.2(a) of this chapter.
( 2 ) Information given upon determination of an emergency under § 300.2(c)(5) of this chapter.
( 3 ) Information given at the request of a DOT employee in a tariff matter under § 300.2(c)(6) of this chapter.
( 4 ) Communications in nonhearing cases to be decided within 30 days under § 300.2(c)(7) of this chapter.
( 5 ) Communications in nonhearing cases arising under 49 U.S.C. 41731-42, made under § 300.2(c)(8).
( b ) *Public filing.* ( 1 ) A written communication shall be placed onto the electronic docket management system (*http://www.regulations.gov*) in the file of the docket number corresponding to the proceeding, which shall be available for inspection and copying during business hours in Office of Docket Operations.
( 2 ) An oral communication shall be summarized by the DOT employee receiving it. One copy shall be put into a public file as described in paragraph (b) (1) of this section, and another copy shall be mailed to the communicator.
( 3 ) Electronic copies of written communications and oral summaries shall be posted to the DOT's electronic docket. Such docketed materials may be searched, viewed, and downloaded through the Internet at *www.regulations.gov*
( 4 ) Copies of all filings under this part dealing with discontinuances or reductions of air transportation shall be mailed to the directly affected local communities, State agencies, and airport managers.
( c ) *Status and expedition requests.* A DOT decisionmaker who receives a communication asking about the status or requesting expeditious treatment of a public proceeding, other than a communication concerning national defense or foreign policy (including international aviation), shall either: ( 1 ) Refer the communicator to Office of Docket Operations.
( 2 ) If the DOT decisionmaker responds by advising on the status, put a memorandum describing the exchange in the public file as described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
[Doc. No. 82, 50 FR 2380, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended at 60 FR 43528, Aug. 22, 1995; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2002-12200, 67 FR 30325, May 6, 2002; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019]
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 13

- 00151

- CR

ANDRE ’ A DEMONT DEWBERRY, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 7th District Court Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. 007

- 1095

- 12

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.2 

### ORDER
Clement Dunn , counsel for the appellant, Andre’a Demont Dewberry , has filed a motion to extend time to file the appellant’s brief. The brief was due November 27 , 201 3

. In h is motion, counsel does not provide th is Court with a reasonable explanation of the need for an extension of time. This Court interprets Texas Ru le of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b)(2) as requiring counsel to provide specific information to justify a requested extension, including the cause numbers of other briefs filed, the dates they were filed, the dates of trials, how long those trials are expecte d to last, etc. Broad, general statements do not provide the required facts and are not adequate to meet the requirements of the R ule. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b)(2).
All future motions to extend time must contain case

- specific information adequate to j ustify the request, or they will be denied. In this instance, we grant the motion an d exten d the deadline for filing appellant’s brief by thirty days, making appellant’s brief now due December 27 , 2013. Further requests for
extensions will not be looked on with favor.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: December 3, 2013
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In the matter of:

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO

Debtor

CASE NO. 17-bk-03283

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Comes now creditor P. R. Used Oil Collectors, Inc. through the undersigned legal 

representative and respectfully states and prays as follows:

1. The interests of P. R. Used Oil Collectors, Inc. will be actively managed by the 

undersigned attorney and the firm of Oliveras & Ortiz Law Offices, PSC.

2. In light of the aforementioned, it is requested that an appearance by the undersigned 

attorney and the law firm of Oliveras & Ortiz, PSC be entered on behalf of P. R. Used Oil Collectors, 

Inc.

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the Honorable Court take notice of this 

motion and enter an appearance by Luis Ramón Ortiz Segura, Esq., of Oliveras & Ortiz Law Offices 

PSC, on behalf of P. R. Used Oil Collectors, Inc.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, in San Juan, Puerto Rico this 24TH day of May, 2018.

I Hereby Certify that on this same date I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 

Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the attorneys of record. 

S/Luis R. Ortiz Segura 

Bar Number: 201609

LUIS R. ORTIZ SEGURA

Oliveras & Ortiz Law Offices PSC

171 Chardón Ave., Suite 406

San Juan, PR 00918-1722

Telephone 787-724-8103

Facsimile 787-724-8152

E-mail: l.ortizsegura@ploolaw.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3137 Filed:05/24/18 Entered:05/24/18 11:07:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### McBRIDE v. THE STATE.

(Decided February 1, 1916.)

Appeal from Coffee Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

Appeal dismissed on motion of the Attorney General, under the authority of *Sanders v. State, infra,*70 South. 949, the same conditions obtaining as in that case.
SERVED: DECEMBER 20, 2011 

U.S. DI-,PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION /A^'^K^IJ^^ 

OM'lCh OF l-lhARlNGS .r.r-'...rj OPFRVfir''''^ 

WASHINGTON, DC ' '"'' "^ '"" ^-"^"'^"^''''^ 

Zuii CtC 20 P 2: 5 3 

1NTHBMA1T12R0F 

IVY IZNTBRPRISESJNC. 

•AA DOCKET NO. [TO Bl: ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penally Action) 

FDMSNO. rAA-2011-1116 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (herclofore designated as Case No. 20I0SO700376) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket., and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service ListChief Administrative Law^J udgt 
FDMSNo. FAA-20I1-III6 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^3 0 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WIO00' 

ONE COPY 

Alexander G. Bateman, ir.^.Respondeni '.v Counsel 

Ruskin Moscou Faltischek P.C. 

1425 RXR Plaza 

East Tower, 15th Floor 

UniondalcNY 11556-1425 

TEL: 516-663-6589 

FAX: 516-663-6789 

Jeanine C. Gotimer, Complainanl.'s Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3272 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Adminislralion, 600 independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Altention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30. 

- 7 -
§ 292.22 Effectiveness of tariffs on file. ( a ) Cargo rate tariffs on file with the Department, including related classification and/or applicability rules, cease to be effective as tariffs under 49 U.S.C. 41504 and 41510, as well as under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 221, and they are canceled by operation of law.
( b ) As of March 1, 1996, all remaining cargo tariffs on file with the Department cease to be effective as tariffs under 49 U.S.C. 41504 and the provisions of 14 CFR part 221, and are cancelled by operation of law. Any such tariffs may be cancelled voluntarily prior to that date. With respect to terms expressly agreed in the contract of carriage, carriers, agents and other persons are relieved from the requirement of adherence to filed tariffs in 49 U.S.C. 41510 and the related provisions of 14 CFR part 221 as of November 30, 1995.
( c ) Applications for filing and/or effectiveness of any cargo tariffs pending on November 30, 1995 are dismissed by operation of law. No new filings or applications will be permitted except as provided under § 292.11.
#### Huston *et al.*Appellants, *v.*Hayter, Administrator.

On bill of exceptions taken to a judgment of tbe circuit court, on motion to quash a forthcoming bond and execution thereon, the bond and execution will not be considered a part of the record, although they appear in the transcript, unless they are recited in the bill of exceptions.

The grounds of a motion to quash a forthcoming bond, should be set out in the motion.

APPEAL from the circuit court of the county of Lafayette.

Thompson, for appellants.

Clayton, contra.

Turner, Justice.

The appellant relies for the reversal of the judgment of the court below on grounds which do not so appear on the record as to enable this court *to notice*them.

The appeal is from the judgment of the court below, overruling a motion to quash a forthcoming bond and execution. There is a bill of exceptions on the transcript, but it does not set forth the forthcoming bond or execution; and according to the repeated decisions of this court, we cannot consider of them, although there does appear on the face of the transcript a copy of a bond and of an execution.

The counsel who took the exceptions to the opinion of the court, appears to have had his attention fixed upon the point, that the court could, at a term subsequent to that to which the execution and bond was returnable, entertain a motion to quash them, especially where the return term had not been holden. However erroneous that opinion of the circuit judge might have been, (and *581of that we give no opinion,) the party should present a case to which such opinion could properly apply.

The only parts of the record which we can notice, under the repeated decisions of this court, consist of the names of the parties, the “motion to quash forthcoming bond and execution,” the decision of the court, “that the *said*motion be overruled,” and the bill of exceptions; so that it is out of our power to consider of the merits of the case.

In the entry of the motion to quash, no *reasons*are assigned. It is surely but reasonable to require, that a party who seeks to set aside a judgment of this kind,. and the bond and execution, should spread his reasons upon the minutes of the court. It should be considered in the nature of an assignment of errors, of a motion in arrest of .judgment, or a motion for a new trial, instances in which the reasons and grounds of complaint are specifically and distinctly set forth.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23





The Board of Directors
Global Election Systems Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
0-24725) on Form 10-SB/A of Global Election Systems Inc. of our report dated 25
August 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Global Election
Systems Inc. and subsidiaries as of 30 June 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of changes in stockholders equity, income (loss) and
cash flows for the periods ended 30 June 1999, 1998, 1997 and 31 December 1996,
which report appears in the 30 June 1999, annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Global Election Systems Inc. to which use in the Form 10KSB we also consent.






                                                Staley, Okada, Chandler & Scott


Burnaby, B.C.                                   STALEY, OKADA, CHANDLER & SCOTT
28 September 1999                                         CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Plumbing &
Mechanical, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert A. Christianson, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: May 15, 2003                                  /s/ Robert A. Christianson
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    Robert A. Christianson
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
01:23428990.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, 

 as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.

 Debtors. 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

POPULAR, INC., POPULAR SECURITIES LLC, AND 

BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO’S AMENDED INFORMATIVE 

MOTION REGARDING JULY 25-26, 2018 OMNIBUS HEARING 

Popular, Inc. (“Popular”), Popular Securities LLC (“Popular Securities”), and Banco 

Popular de Puerto Rico (“Banco Popular,” and collectively with Popular and Popular Securities, 

the “Popular Entities”) submit this informative motion in response to the Court’s Notice of 

Hearing and Procedure Order [ECF No. 3472, 17 BK 3283], and respectfully state as follows: 

1. John T. Dorsey intends to speak on behalf of the Popular Entities at the July 25-

26, 2018 hearing with respect to all matters relating to the Motion of the Independent 

Investigator for an Order: (I) Establishing Procedures for Resolving any Confidentiality Dispute 

in Connection With Publication of the Independent Investigator’s Final Report; (II) Approving 

the Disposition of Documents and Information; (III) Relieving the Independent Investigator 

From Certain Discovery Obligations; (IV) Exculpating the Independent Investigator in 

Connection With the Investigation and Publication of the Final Report; and (V) Granting 

Related Relief [ECF No. 3427, 17 BK 3283] (the “Motion”). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3647 Filed:07/19/18 Entered:07/19/18 17:00:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 

01:23428990.1 

2. Mr. Dorsey will appear in person in Courtroom 2 of the United States District 

Court for the District of Puerto Rico, 150 Carlos Chardon Street, Federal Building, San Juan, 

Puerto Rico 00918. 

3. Mr. Dorsey also appears to respond to any matters raised by the Court or to any 

statements made by interested parties in connection with the Motion or the above-captioned Title 

III proceedings. 

4. The Popular Entities understand that one additional attorney representing them in 

these proceedings will personally attend the July 25-26, 2018 omnibus hearing in Puerto Rico. 

Dated: July 19, 2018 

 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Donna A. Maldonado- Rivera 

 

 USDC-PR Bar No. 219008 

Popular Center-9th Floor 

 209 Muñoz Rivera Ave. 

 San Juan, P.R. 00918 

 Telephone: 787-753-1017 

 Facsimile: 787-754-4984 

 E-mail: Donna.Maldonado@popular.com 

-andYOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT 

& TAYLOR, LLP

/s/ John T. Dorsey 

James L. Patton (admitted pro hac vice) 

Robert S. Brady (admitted pro hac vice) 

John T. Dorsey (admitted pro hac vice) 

1000 North King Street 

Wilmington, Delaware 19801 

Telephone: (302) 571-6600 

Facsimile: (302) 571-1253 

E-mail: jdorsey@ycst.com 

Counsel to Popular, Inc., Popular Securities LLC, 

and Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3647 Filed:07/19/18 Entered:07/19/18 17:00:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 443 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 443

            To modify the definition of an antique firearm.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2019

  Mr. Cassidy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To modify the definition of an antique firearm.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE.

    Section 921(a)(16)(A) of title 18, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ``1898'' and inserting ``the calendar year that is 100 
years before the calendar year in which the determination as to whether 
the firearm meets the requirement of this subparagraph is being made''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986.

    Subsection (g) of section 5845 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended to read as follows:
    ``(g) Antique Firearm.--
            ``(1) In general.--The term `antique firearm' means--
                    ``(A) any firearm manufactured in or before the 
                applicable year (including any matchlock, flintlock, 
                percussion cap, or similar type of ignition system or 
                replica thereof, whether actually manufactured before 
                or after the applicable year), and
                    ``(B) any firearm using fixed ammunition 
                manufactured in or before the applicable year, for 
                which ammunition is no longer manufactured in the 
                United States and is not readily available in the 
                ordinary channels of commercial trade.
            ``(2) Applicable year.--For purposes of paragraph (1), the 
        term `applicable year' means the calendar year that is 100 
        years before the calendar year in which the determination as to 
        whether the firearm meets the requirements of such paragraph is 
        being made.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 149I/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 149I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 669 June 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 149I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 669 June 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1139 of 8 June 2023 amending for the 336th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1140 of 9 June 2023 amending for the 337th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1139 of 8 June 2023 amending for the 336th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1140 of 9 June 2023 amending for the 337th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[No. 26961-9-II.

Division Two.

November 22, 2002.]

#### David S. Dixon, *Appellant,*v. ERA Twin County Realty, Inc., et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 96-2-01572-1, David E. Foscue, J., entered December 6, 2000. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, C.J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Bridgewater, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Graham Packaging
Holdings Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as supplemented by the Amendment No. 1, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Burgess, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings
Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 2, 2011



By:

/s/ Mark S. BurgessMark S. BurgessChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



48