alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1


                     Schedule of Earnings to Fixed Charges


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        Year Ended December 31,

                                                    1996          1997           1998
                                                    ----          ----           ----
<S>                                             <C>            <C>            <C>
EARNINGS
   ADD:
     Pretax income from continuing operations   (1,045,984)    (2,301,226)    (12,776,191)
     Fixed charges                                 268,086        309,082      10,546,132
     Amortization of capitalized interest               --          4,814           4,628
                                                ----------      ---------      ----------

                                                  (777,898)    (1,987,330)     (2,225,431)

   SUBTRACT:
     Interest capitalized                          180,501        142,457       1,543,520
     Minority interest in pre-tax income of subs
           that have not incurred fixed charges    248,039        994,000       1,026,001
                                                ----------      ---------      ----------

                                                   428,540      1,136,457       2,569,521

                            Total Earnings      (1,206,438)    (3,123,787)     (4,794,952)

         Ratio of earnings to fixed charges          (4.50)x       (10.11)x         (0.45)x
</TABLE>




Rev. July ___, 1998
                                                                   Page 89 of 92
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 9, 2009

1215 

# Order

January 9, 2009

137375

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137375 COA: 278799 Kent CC: 06-009771-FH TERRELL VASH AWN ROSS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 26, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., not participating.
#### § 27.1391 Minimum intensities in the horizontal plane of forward and rear position lights.

Each position light intensity must equal or exceed the applicable values in the following table:

| Dihedral angle (light included) | Angle from right or left of longitudinal axis, measured from dead ahead | Intensity (candles) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| *L* and *R* (forward red and green) | 10° to 10° 10° to 20° 20° to 110° | 40 30 5 |
| *A* (rear white) | 110° to 180° | 20 |
#### § 29.815 Main aisle width.

The main passenger aisle width between seats must equal or exceed the values in the following table:

| Passenger seating capacity | Minimum main passenger aisle width | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Less than 25 inches from floor (inches) | 25 Inches and more from floor (inches) |
| 10 or less | 12 | 15 |
| 11 through 19 | 12 | 20 |
| 20 or more | 15 | 20 |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 A narrower width not less than 9 inches may be approved when substantiated by tests found necessary by the Administrator. | | |

[Doc. No. 5084, [29 FR 16150](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/29-FR-16150), Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-12, [41 FR 55472](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/41-FR-55472), Dec. 20, 1976]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,758,234
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,934,315
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,934,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          674,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,259,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,934,315
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.7
 
  WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW THEREFORE,
 1. SCOPE OF AMENDMENT
  2. APPENDIX B  STATEMENT OF WORK
  
    
    Signed Negotiation Minutes
    
    XELs proposal response to Verizons RRP/Targets under
Flexgrow IAD RFP, including the business proposal dated 7/13/03
from Jim Nevelle.




---



##### 




    
    Verizon Questions and XEL answers to those questions as
part of the Verizon Flexgrow IAD RFP.
    
    XELs proposal response to Verizons Flexgrow IAD RFP.
  3. MARKETSHARE COMMITMENT
  4. PRICING
  5. OTHER TERMS UNCHANGED
  6. ENTIRE AMENDMENT




---



##### 



XEL COMMUNICATIONS INC.
    
    TELESECTOR RESOURCES GROUP, INC.
          A Verizon Company/s/ Michael Hull

Signature
    
    /s/ George S. Dowell

SignatureMichael Hull

Name
    
    George S. Dowell

NameVice - President

Title
    
    SVP - Corporate Sourcing

Title8/22/03
    
    8/28/03Date
    
    Date
180730 ORD RE RESCH SEPT OMNI VERSION JULY 30, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER REGARDING THE SEPTEMBER 12, 2018 OMNIBUS HEARING

At the July 25, 2018 Omnibus Hearing, the Court received a request to reschedule 

or otherwise relocate the September 12, 2018 Omnibus Hearing (the “September Omnibus 

Hearing”) due to the temporal proximity of the September Omnibus Hearing to a religious 

holiday. In light of the request, the Court plans to reschedule the September Omnibus Hearing to 

September 13, 2018 (the “Proposed Date”) in Puerto Rico. Counsel may file informative 

motions by August 1, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time) to the extent that the 

Proposed Date presents a conflict. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). 

(Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3722 Filed:07/30/18 Entered:07/30/18 14:55:32 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
ShawnM. Garvin RECERI

FD

Regional Administrator MAR U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 142012 RECEVEDRegion III (Mail Cod: 3RAOO) 3AP30 IA AD i ‘)fli 1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 Lrecior (3APOO)

Subject: Withdrawal ofthe District of Columbia Portion of 1997 PM2.5NAAQS

Attainment SIP Revision for the Washington DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area

Dearj.c.

On April 2, 2008, the District ofColumbia submitted a revision to its State Implementation Plan(SIP) for attaining the 1997 national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for PM2.5and

requested U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) approval. The revision demonstrated

the anticipated improvements to the air quality in the Washington DC-MD-VA NonattainmentArea and the efforts being taken to achieve the 1997 PM2.5NAAQS by 2009. The April 2, 2008,

SIP revision for the Washington DC-MD-VA area included (i) the attainment plan, (ii) analysis

ofreasonably available control measures, (iii) attainment demonstration, (iv) contingency plansfor failure to attain the air quality standard, (v) mobile source budgets, and (vi) the base year2002 air pollutant emissions inventory.

Air quality has significantly improved in the Washington DC-MD-VA area. On January 12,2009, EPA issued a clean data determination for the area (74 FR 1146). The clean data

determination suspended the requirements for the District of Columbia to submit attainment

demonstrations and associated reasonably available control measures, reasonable further

progress plans, contingency measures, and other SIPs related to attainment ofthe 1997 PM2.5

NAAQS in the area. The purpose ofthis letter is to withdraw those portions ofthe April 2, 2008,

submittal. Specifically, the District of Columbia hereby withdraws the (i) attainment plan, (ii)

analysis ofreasonably available control measures, (iii) attainment demonstration, (iv)contingency plans for failure to attain the air quality standard, and (v) mobile source budgets, all

of which were submitted on April 2, 2008. To ensure that the District of Columbia has met the

requirements of § 1 72(c)(3) ofthe Clean Air Act regarding emissions inventory submittals, the

District ofColumbia is not requesting the withdrawal ofthe base year 2002 air pollutantemissions inventory, which comprised Chapter 3 and Appendix B ofthe SIP revision documents

submitted on April 2, 2008. *

*1 *

DISTRICT green forward **DEPARTMENT

OFTHE A . .

*

ENVIRONMENT 1200 First St. NE, 5th Floor, Washmgton, DC 20002 tel: 202.535.2600 I web:ddoe.dc.gov
y 

Q

y 

(

) 

fl

Directorcc: Diana Esher, Director, Air Protection Division, EPA Region 3

Cecily Beall, Associate Director, Air Quality Division, DDOE
#### § 27.251 Vibration.

Each part of the rotorcraft must be free from excessive vibration under each appropriate speed and power condition.
###### Editorial Note on Part 380

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 380.35 Disbursements from depository account.

No charter operator or direct air carrier shall cause its agents or the depository bank to make disbursements or payments from deposits except in accordance with the provisions of this part.
#### § 33.13 [Reserved]
S14 447 3747 CAS CS @ 003/003 

Inventory Expert Service 

A division of the American Chemicai Society Phone: 800-631· 1-884, 614-147-3870 . Fax:&l-4-447-3747 

&mait~c;as.org 

Web:~cas.orw'produc:ts/dlentf 

INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT 

REGISTRY NUMBER: 1217271-02-7 

CA INDEX NAME 

Cyclohexanemethanamine, ~[2,2-dimethyl-3-(4-morpholinyllpropylidene]-

[(2,2-dimethyl-3-(4-morpholinyl)propylid~e]amino)"-1,3,3-trimethy:lPlease print the above CA J:Ddex !ITame on the appropriate page of your PIIIH. 

IJ If ·this box is c:Aecmea, CAS has-macie correotion(s} marked j,n red -to 

your IES order. Please ·mate the same -eor:raation(a} to ~ Pldlll before 

submitting it to the EPA. 

P.O. Sex 33<13 Columbu" Ohio 4321 ().0334 USA
Exhibit 10.24


              BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF KEYSPAN
                        IN EFFECT AS OF FEBRUARY 23, 2006

On February 23, 2006,  following  the  recommendation  of the  Compensation  and
Management  Development  Committee,  KeySpan's  Board of Directors  set the 2006
annual  base  salaries  of the named  executive  officers  (as  defined  in Item
402(a)(3) of Regulation  S-K) of KeySpan  Corporation  (effective as of the date
indicated) as follows:

      Name                                                          Salary
      ----                                                          ------
Robert B. Catell
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                                 $1,140,000
(Effective January 1, 2006)

Robert J. Fani
President & Chief Operating Officer                                  $782,000
(Effective January 1, 2006)

Wallace P. Parker Jr.
President, Energy Delivery and Customer Relationship Group          $625,000
(Effective January 1, 2006)

Steven L. Zelkowitz
President, Energy Assets and Supply Group                            $625,000
(Effective January 1, 2005)

Gerald Luterman
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer                   $488,000
(Effective February 1, 2006)
#### § 25.815 Width of aisle.

The passenger aisle width at any point between seats must equal or exceed the values in the following table:

| Passenger seating capacity | Minimum passenger aisle width (inches) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Less than 25 in. from floor | 25 in. and more from floor |
| 10 or less | 1 12 | 15 |
| 11 through 19 | 12 | 20 |
| 20 or more | 15 | 20 |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 A narrower width not less than 9 inches may be approved when substantiated by tests found necessary by the Administrator. | | |

[Amdt. 25-15, [32 FR 13265](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/32-FR-13265), Sept. 20, 1967, as amended by Amdt. 25-38, [41 FR 55466](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/41-FR-55466), Dec. 20, 1976]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III                              
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive Officer May 11, 2006



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|/S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                              
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial Officer
May 11, 2006
EXHIBIT 36 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4014-32 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 16:51:23 Desc:

Exhibit 36 Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4014-32 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 16:51:23 Desc:

Exhibit 36 Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4014-32 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 16:51:23 Desc:

Exhibit 36 Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4014-32 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 16:51:23 Desc:

Exhibit 36 Page 4 of 4
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of 24/7 RealMedia, Inc. (the “**Company**”)on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, David J. Moore, Chairman andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

April 30,2007
|        | /s/ David J. Moore                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)        |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
#### § 297.4 Joint loading.

Nothing in this part shall preclude joint loading, meaning the pooling of shipments and their delivery to a direct air carrier for transportation as one shipment, under an agreement between two or more indirect air carriers or foreign indirect air carriers.
Submitted on briefs April 14,

affirmed May 24, 1927.

#### In Re Will of W. H. SHEPHERD. WILLIAM D. ALLINGHAM *v.*OLIVE M. SHEPHERD.

(256 Pac. 1119.)

(No Syllabus.)

Wills, 40 Cyc., p. 1023, n. 29, p. 1165, n. 87.

From Multnomah: George Tazwell, Judge.

In Banc.

Affirmed.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of *Mr. W. N. Gatens*and *Mr. Frank E. Manning.*

For respondent there was a brief over the names of *Mr. W. B. Shively*and *Mr. Henry Bauer.*

*620BELT, J.

This is a proceeding to set aside the last will and testament of W. H. Shepherd, deceased, on the grounds of (1) undue influence, (2) incapacity of testator and (3) improper manner of execution. No questions of law are involved. It would require a lengthy opinion to even summarize the facts, with no resulting benefit. A congested docket demands brevity.

After careful study of the record, we have no hesitancy in concurring with the .findings of the trial court that Shepherd at the time of the execution of his will, on June 25, 1923, was of sound and disposing mind. In fact, there is absolutely no evidence to the contrary. The nearest approach thereto was the testimony of Olive M. Shepherd, widow of testator and contestant herein, who, in response to question, “What was the condition of his mind on the 25th day of June, 1923?” answered, “He was in a daze and sort of stupor; he was so exhausted from his sickness that he certainly didn’t have a very good mind.”

No undue influence was exercised over testator. The will was the product of his own mind. We fail to find where any fraud or deceit was practiced. Mr. Bauer, the attorney who prepared the will and who signed as subscribing witness thereto, acted in keeping with the dignity and honor of his profession. Insinuations to the contrary are wholly unwarranted.

The third ground of contest was practically conceded as untenable during course of the trial and need not be considered.

The decree of the trial court sustaining the will is affirmed. Affirmed.
SEWER ASSESSMENTS.

(Hamilton Circuit Court,

1896.)

Smith, Cox and Swing, JJ.

#### Mueller v. Cincinnati (City).

Statute as to Limitation oe Lots to be Assessed Should be More Explicit.

The statute, relative to the exemption or limitation of lots to be assessed for sewers, on account of local drainage, should be made more explicit; as it now stands, whether a lot needs drainage or has drainage, must be largely a question of opinion, not regulated by any fixed standard.

Swing, J.

This was an action to enjoin the collection of a certain assessment for the construction of a sewer, on the ground that the lot in question is exempt under the statute on account of being provided with local drainage and does not need it.

The statute should be more explicit in this regard. It should be made more definite in pointing out the limitations of the lots to be assessed. As it now stands, whether a lot needs drainage or has drainage, must be largely a question of opinion merely, and not regulated by any fixed standard. The lot in question, in case at bar, is not exempt, either on the ground that it does not need drainage or has local drainage.