alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Letter Amendment to the Acquisition Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.06 
 EXECUTION VERSION 
 

 
 October 2, 2009 
 Syniverse Holdings, Inc. 
 8125 Highwoods Palm Way 
 Tampa, FL 33647 
 Attention: General Counsel

 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Reference is made herein to the Acquisition Agreement by and among VERISIGN, INC., VERISIGN S.À.R.L., VERISIGN DO BRASIL SERVIÇOS PARA INTERNET LTDA, VERISIGN DIGITAL SERVICES TECHNOLOGY (CHINA) CO., LTD., VERISIGN SERVICES
INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (each, a “Seller Party”), and SYNIVERSE HOLDINGS, INC. (“Purchaser”), dated as of August 24, 2009 (the “Acquisition Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Acquisition Agreement. 
 Each Seller Party and Purchaser hereby agree
to amend Section 1.01(ii)(a) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule by adding the following additional patent applications thereto, effective as of August 24, 2009: 
  

											
	 Family
No
	  	 Application No.
	  	 Patent Title
	  	Grant
Date	  	Patent No.	  	 Notes

	7	  	EP 07839732.0	  	A Method and Apparatus For Response Enabled Messaging	  		  		  	Annuity due 10/22/2009. BSTZ Ref. 6783.P087EP.
	7	  	CA Not yet assigned	  	A Method and Apparatus For Response Enabled Messaging	  		  		  	Maintenance fee due 10/22/2010. BSTZ Ref. 6783.P087CA.

 Except as specifically stated above, the Acquisition Agreement remains in full force
and effect. 
 [Signature Pages Follow] 
  

 1 









					
	Very truly yours,
	
	VERISIGN, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin A. Werner

		 	Name:	 	Kevin A. Werner
		 	Title:	 	SVP, Corp. & Strat. Development
	
	VERISIGN S.À.R.L.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin A. Werner

		 	Name:	 	Kevin A. Werner
		 	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory
	
	 VERISIGN DO BRASIL SERVIÇOS PARA INTERNET LTDA

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin A. Werner

		 	Name:	 	Kevin A. Werner
		 	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory
	
	 VERISIGN DIGITAL SERVICES TECHNOLOGY (CHINA) CO., LTD.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin A. Werner

		 	Name:	 	Kevin A. Werner
		 	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory
	
	 VERISIGN SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin A. Werner

		 	Name:	 	Kevin A. Werner
		 	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory









 Accepted and Agreed: 
  

					
	SYNIVERSE HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Tony G. Holcombe

		 	Name:	 	Tony G. Holcombe
		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer

 SIGNATURE PAGE TO LETTER AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE ACQUISITION 
 AGREEMENT
[Crim. No. 472.

.Department One.

November 19, 1898.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. H. W. KNOWLTON, Appellant.

Cbiminal Law—Evidence—Admissions of Defendant—Menace.—Declarations of the defendant in a criminal case, not amounting to a confession of guilt, are admissible, without regard to the question whether they were made under menace and undue influence.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County and from an order denying a new trial. J. A. Beard, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court5

James F. Lodge, for Appellant.

W. F. Fitzgerald, Attorney General, and W. H. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

GAROUTTE, J.

Defendant has been convicted of a felony and now appeals. He was prosecuted under section 332 of the Penal Code upon an information. The information is in the general form held sufficient in *People v. Frigerio,*107 Cal. 152, and is clearly sufficient. The evidence also is ample to support the verdict. It is insisted that error was committed by the court in admitting certain declarations of the defendant before the jury which were claimed to have been made under menace and undue influence. It is sufficient to say that the declarations made in no sense amounted to a confession of guilt, and therefore any question of menace and undue influence does not arise.

For the foregoing reasons the judgment and order are affirmed.

Harrison, J., and Van Fleet, J., concurred.
DISMISS; Opinion Filed February 4, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01045-CV

WILLIAM C. TITUS, Appellant

V.

KIMBERLY A. KELLY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-10004

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Myers, and Justice Evans

Opinion by Justice Evans

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By 

postcard dated July 11, 2014 we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed 

appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated July 11, 2014, we notified 

appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file 

the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might 

result in dismissal of this appeal. By letter dated September 16, 2014, we informed appellant the 

clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay 

for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements 

to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant had been found to be 

entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would 
–2–

result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the 

filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

141045F.P05

/ David Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM C. TITUS, Appellant

No. 05-14-01045-CV V.

KIMBERLY A. KELLY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-10004.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. Chief 

Justice Wright and Justice Myers 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee KIMBERLY A. KELLY recover her costs of this appeal 

from appellant WILLIAM C. TITUS.

Judgment entered this 4th day of February, 2015.
#### Howard K. Allon, Respondent, *v.*Park Central Hotel Co., Inc., Defendant, and Lawrence B. Simon, Appellant.

(Argued October 21, 1936;

decided November 24, 1936.)

*632
      *Everett W. Bovard*and *Leo F. Potts*for appellant.

*Jesse Climenko, Abraham Engleman*and *George Lefkin*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J., and Hubbs, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                           4,090
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,090
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,030
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,090
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,852
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,852)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,852)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,000)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,852)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ITXC Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Tom Evslin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated
result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 15, 2004



/s/ Tom EvslinTom EvslinChief Executive Officer of ITXC Corp.




This certification has been
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM ZEON CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796513
<NAME> ZEON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                       0
<CASH>                                         144,399
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 886,991
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,005
<OTHER-SE>                                     652,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   886,991
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                  0
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                           0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,781
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,781
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,781
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,781
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
§ 27.609 Protection of structure. Each part of the structure must— ( a ) Be suitably protected against deterioration or loss of strength in service due to any cause, including— ( 1 ) Weathering;
( 2 ) Corrosion; and
( 3 ) Abrasion; and
( b ) Have provisions for ventilation and drainage where necessary to prevent the accumulation of corrosive, flammable, or noxious fluids.
§ 250.8 Denied boarding compensation. ( a ) Every carrier shall tender to a passenger eligible for denied boarding compensation, on the day and place the denied boarding occurs, except as provided in paragraph (b), cash or an immediately negotiable check for the appropriate amount of compensation provided in § 250.5.
( b ) Where a carrier arranges, for the passenger's convenience, alternate means of transportation that departs before the payment can be prepared and given to the passenger, tender shall be made by mail or other means within 24 hours after the time the denied boarding occurs.
[ER-1394, 49 FR 43625, Oct. 31, 1984]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the Quarterly Report  of  Allstates
WorldCargo, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending  June 30, 2006 as  filed  with  the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I,  Craig  D.  Stratton,
Chief Financial  Officer  of  the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
         company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
         operations of the Company for the periods presented.


Dated: August 11, 2006

/s/ Craig D. Stratton
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer



This  certification  has been furnished solely  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Bank Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allen
T. Nelson, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




-------------------------
Allen T. Nelson, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003
#### § 1214.600 Scope.

This subpart establishes policy and procedures for carrying mementos on the NASA missions, with the exception of mementos and personal effects carried onboard the International Space Station (ISS).
[No. 49544-5-I.

Division One.

October 28, 2002.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*William M. Lukoskie, Jr., *Appellant,*and Soon Kim, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 99-3-06845-2, Richard D. Eadie, J., entered October 15, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Cox, A.C.J., and Schindler, J.
#### Renshaw Estate

*J. Stroud Weber,*for accountant.

October 22, 1957.

Taxis, P. J.,

— The said minor, known as Patricia M. Driggs, will not arrive at full age until December 3, 1959.

The reason or purpose for the filing of the account now before the court is that the minor has become a nonresident of this Commonwealth, and upon petition and by decree of this court under date of July 26,1957, copies of which have been submitted and are attached hereto, the present guardianship may be terminated upon proof of the appointment of a new guardian for said minor in Knoxville, Tenn. A certified copy of the appointment, by the County Court of Knox County, *588State of Tennessee, of Dorothea R. Driggs as guardian for Patricia M. Driggs, has been submitted and is attached hereto. Also submitted, and attached hereto, is affidavit evidencing that no rights of a resident of the Commonwealth will be adversely affected and that removal of the property will not conflict with any limitations upon the right of the minor to such property, all in accordance with section 1121 of the Fiduciaries Act of April 18,1949, P. L. 512, Cf. Reed Estate, 80 D. & C. 504. Said guardianship is therefore terminated.

The account shows a balance for distribution of $7,326.40, composed, as set forth on page 2, of U. S. Treasury bonds $4,960.79, and cash.

The balance for distribution is awarded to Dorothea R. Driggs, guardian for Patricia M. Driggs, a minor, for further administration in the jurisdiction where the minor resides.
#### § 29.341 Gust loads.

Each rotorcraft must be designed to withstand, at each critical airspeed including hovering, the loads resulting from vertical and horizontal gusts of 30 feet per second.
Exhibit 3 Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24869-3 Filed:08/11/23 Entered:08/11/23 17:02:25 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24869-3 Filed:08/11/23 Entered:08/11/23 17:02:25 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24869-3 Filed:08/11/23 Entered:08/11/23 17:02:25 Desc:

Exhibit Page 3 of 3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

Order 

October 22, 2012

144499(49)

E. T. MACKENZIE CO.,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/

Cross-Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant- Appellant,

v SC: 144499

COA: 297406

Clinton CC: 06-010088-CH

RBS CONSTRUCTION, INC. a/k/a RBS

COMPANIES, INC. and KBB CONSTRUCTION,

INC.,

Defendants,

and

LANSING CLASSIC LIVING, L.L.C., 

Defendant/Counter-Defendant/

Cross-Defendant,

and

INDEPENDENT BANK WEST MICHIGAN,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/

Counter-Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/

Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

v 

KEBS, INC., SPARTAN IRRIGATION, INC.,

AMERI-CONSTRUCTION & CONCRETE, INC.,

TREES, INC., and MPC CASH-WAY LUMBER,

CO.,

Third-Party Defendants/Third-Party

Cross-Plaintiffs/Third-Party Counter- Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and 
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 22, 2012

h1015

2

G & B SUPPLY CO., HARRIS HOMES

CARPENTRY, INC., MCGUIRE 

MECHANICAL, INC., THOMAS H. MALLORY, 

PARAGON CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD., VANS

EXCAVATING, LTD., KENNETH F. DANTER, 

WILLIAM E. HOLLAND, III, CHRISTENSEN’S 

PLANT CENTER, INC., GUNNER PLUMBING,

INC., STREAMLINE ENTERPRISES, INC.,

TODD FISHER a/k/a TF & KC PAINTING, INC., 

TOTAL OUTDOOR SERVICES, INC., 

MCPHERSON BUILDERS, INC., and E.W. 

KITCHENS, INC.,

Third-Party Defendants,

and 

THOMPSON-MCCULLY ASPHALT PAVING, 

L.L.C. a/k/a MICHIGAN PAVING & 

MATERIALS CO. d/b/a SPARTAN ASPHALT

PAVING CO.,

Third-Party Defendant/Third-Party

Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party

Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 24, 2012 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ADRIAN CARLOS PADILLA,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 110 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of July, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.