alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

TIMOTHY HANNAH,

Petitioner

v.

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 218 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.2

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006 of KeySpan  Corporation (the  "Corporation"),  as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Gerald Luterman,
Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Corporation,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Corporation.



Date:      February 22, 2007


                                        /s/ Gerald Luterman
                                        -------------------
                                        Gerald Luterman
                                        Executive Vice President
                                        and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Annual
      Report of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K/A
      for
      the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report") certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





1.
            The
                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Playboy Enterprises,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Christie Hefner, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Linda G. Havard,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christie Hefner
------------------------------
Name:  Christie Hefner
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 14, 2003


/s/ Linda G. Havard
------------------------------
Name:  Linda G. Havard
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  August 14, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Playboy Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Playboy
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT A

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2975-1 Filed:04/27/18 Entered:04/27/18 20:40:28 Desc:

Exhibit Letter October 31 2014 Execution of Performance Bond Page 1 of 3
#### CRESWELL TRADING CO., INC. SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY 1989, D & L Supply Co., Southern Star, Inc., City Pipe & Foundry, Inc., Capitol Foundry Of Virginia, Inc., Virginia Precast Corp., And Techsales, Inc., Plaintiffs, Crescent Foundry Co. P. Ltd., Select Steels, Ltd., RSI (India) Pvt. Ltd., Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, Govind Steel Co., Ltd., R.B. Agarwalla & Co., Serampore Industries P. Ltd., Super Castings (India), Carnation Enterprises P. Ltd., Uma Iron & Steel Co., and Commex Corp., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Allegheny Foundry Co., Campbell Foundry, Co., Deeter Foundry, Inc., East Jordan Iron Works, Inc., Lebaron Foundry, Inc., Municipal Castings, Inc., Neenah Foundry Co., Pinkerton Foundry, Inc., U.S. Foundry & Manufacturing Co., Vulcan Foundry, Inc., and Alhambra Foundry, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors.

Slip Op. 98-139. Court No. 91-01-00012.

United States Court of International Trade.

Sept. 29, 1998.

JUDGMENT ORDER

DICARLO, Senior District Judge.

The United States Department of Commerce has submitted its *Results of Redetermination*in accordance with this Court’s Remand order of June 24, 1998 in the case of *Creswell Trading Co., et al. v. United States,*4 F.Supp.2d 1264, Consol. Court No. 91—01—00012, Slip Op. 98-87. In its Redetermina*319tion of the 1985 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-specific and country-wide subsidy rates to reflect ocean shipping costs. The new rates applicable to the 1985 period of review are as follows:

Carnation Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. 13.83%

Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd. 30.09%

Govind Steel 51.39%

Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works 14.09%

R.B. Agarwalla & Co. 7.96%

R.S.I. 8.22%

Serampore Industries Pvt. Ltd. 22.09%

UMA Iron & Steel Co. 15.64%

Kajaria Castings Ltd. 44.84%

Super Castings (India) 29.40%

Country-wide Rate 22.09%

The Court having reviewed the Redetermi-nation Results, and Commerce having complied with the Court’s Remand, and no comr ments having been received by any party within the time limit set by the Remand Order, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Redetermination Re-suits are affirmed; and it is further

ORDERED that, as all other issues have been decided, this action is dismissed.
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.213 Procedures in foreign air carrier permit cases. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to cases involving foreign air carrier permits under section 41302 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, including applications for new authority, renewals, amendments, modifications, suspensions, and transfers of such permits.
( b ) *Executive departments.* In addition to the standards set forth in § 302.207(b), the views of other executive agencies, such as the Department of State, and the Federal Aviation Administration's evaluation of the applicant's operational fitness, may be sought in determining the appropriate action on applications filed under this section.
( c ) *Order establishing further procedures.* As soon as possible after the date that answers are due and all information needed to reach a decision is filed, the DOT decisionmaker will issue an order as provided in § 302.210.
Exhibit 99.2


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jose S. David, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of ImageX, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of ImageX, Inc.

Date:  November 14, 2002

                                       By: /s/ Jose S. David
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Name:  Jose S. David
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Element 21 Golf Company (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nataliya Hearn,
Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Executive Officer of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.








A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.








Date:
      May 14, 2009
            
            By:  /s/
      Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D.President
      and Director, and Principal Executive Officer
§ 33.73 Power or thrust response. The design and construction of the engine must enable an increase— ( a ) From minimum to rated takeoff power or thrust with the maximum bleed air and power extraction to be permitted in an aircraft, without overtemperature, surge, stall, or other detrimental factors occurring to the engine whenever the power control lever is moved from the minimum to the maximum position in not more than 1 second, except that the Administrator may allow additional time increments for different regimes of control operation requiring control scheduling; and
( b ) From the fixed minimum flight idle power lever position when provided, or if not provided, from not more than 15 percent of the rated takeoff power or thrust available to 95 percent rated takeoff power or thrust in not over 5 seconds. The 5-second power or thrust response must occur from a stabilized static condition using only the bleed air and accessories loads necessary to run the engine. This takeoff rating is specified by the applicant and need not include thrust augmentation.
[Amdt. 33-1, 36 FR 5493, Mar. 24, 1971]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4364 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to require online retailers to disclose 

whether articles sold by such retailers originate in the People’s Republic 

of China, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2020 

Ms. MCSALLY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to require online retailers 

to disclose whether articles sold by such retailers originate in the People’s Republic of China, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE BY ONLINE RETAILERS OF 

4 WHETHER ARTICLES ORIGINATE IN THE PEO5 PLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 

7 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1304) is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4364 IS

1 ‘‘(m) MARKING OF ARTICLES FROM THE PEOPLE’S

2 REPUBLIC OF CHINA SOLD BY ONLINE RETAILERS.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any person that sells, 

4 through an online marketplace or e-commerce plat5 form, articles of foreign origin imported into the 

6 United States, shall state as legibly as possible, in 

7 a conspicuous place on the webpage for each such 

8 article, if any of the following is the People’s Repub9 lic of China: 

10 ‘‘(A) The country of origin of the article. 

11 ‘‘(B) The country of origin of any major 

12 component of the article. 

13 ‘‘(C) The country in which the article was 

14 manufactured. 

15 ‘‘(D) The country in which the article was 

16 assembled. 

17 ‘‘(2) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS.— 

18 The following provisions of this section shall apply 

19 with respect to the statement required by paragraph 

20 (1) to the same extent that such provisions apply 

21 with respect to the marking of articles under sub22 section (a): 

23 ‘‘(A) Paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection 

24 (a). 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4364 IS

1 ‘‘(B) Subparagraphs (E), (H), (I) of sub2 section (a)(3). 

3 ‘‘(C) Subsections (f), (g), (h), (k), and 

4 (l).’’. 

5 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of the Treasury 

6 shall prescribe regulations to carry out subsection (m) of 

7 section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as added by sub8 section (a), which regulations may include exceptions to 

9 the requirements of that subsection for small retailers or 

10 for second point-of-sale retailers. 

11 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub12 section (a) shall apply with respect to articles entered, or 

13 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

14 the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment 

15 of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 29.1549 Powerplant instruments. For each required powerplant instrument, as appropriate to the type of instruments— ( a ) Each maximum and, if applicable, minimum safe operating limit must be marked with a red line;
( b ) Each normal operating range must be marked as a green or unmarked range;
( c ) Each takeoff and precautionary range must be marked with a yellow range or yellow line;
( d ) Each engine or rotor range that is restricted because of excessive vibration stresses must be marked with red ranges or red lines; and
( e ) Each OEI limit or approved operating range must be marked to be clearly differentiated from the markings of paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section except that no marking is normally required for the 30-second OEI limit.
[Amdt. 29-12, 41 FR 55474, Dec. 20, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34220, Sept. 2, 1988; Amdt. 29-34, 59 FR 47769, Sept. 16, 1994; Amdt. 29-59, 88 FR 8739, Feb. 10, 2023]
631 A.2d 905

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Carl A. DURKEE.

Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 39,

Sept. Term, 1993.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Oct. 13, 1993.

ORDER

The Court having considered the joint petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Carl A. Durkee to permit the Court to place Carl A. Durkee on inactive status by consent, it is this 13th day of October, 1993

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the joint petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED and Carl A. Durkee is placed on inactive status by consent from the practice of law, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Carl A. Durkee from the register of attorneys in this Court until further order of this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Rule BV13.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5


<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 1st Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                        (3,675)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 27,725
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                               4,200
<OTHER-SE>                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               0
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               0
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.00)



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.9 Continuances and extensions of time. ( a ) Whenever a party has the right or obligation to take action within a period prescribed by this part, by a notice given thereunder, or by an order or regulation, the DOT decisionmaker or the administrative law judge assigned to the proceeding, as appropriate, may: ( 1 ) Before the expiration of the prescribed period, with or without notice, extend such period, or
( 2 ) Upon motion, permit the act to be done after the expiration of the specified period, where good cause for the failure to act on time is clearly shown.
( b ) Except where an administrative law judge has been assigned to a proceeding, requests for continuance or extensions of time, as described in paragraph (a) of this section, shall be directed to the DOT decisionmaker. Requests for continuances and extensions of time may be directed to the Chief Administrative Law Judge in the absence of the administrative law judge assigned to the proceeding.
§ 293.12 Revocation of exemption. ( a ) The Department, upon complaint or upon its own initiative, may, immediately and without hearing, revoke, in whole or in part, the exemption granted by this part with respect to a carrier or carriers, when such action is in the public interest.
( b ) Any such action will be taken in a notice issued by the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs, and will identify the tariff matter to be filed, and the deadline for carrier compliance.
( c ) Revocations under this section will have the effect of reinstating all applicable tariff requirements and procedures specified in the Department's Regulations for the tariff material to be filed, unless otherwise specified by the Department.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

-------------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.

 Debtors.1

-------------------------------------------------------------x 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

ORDER ADDRESSING CLARIFICATION MOTION FOR 

DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE UTILITIES MOTION

On June 5, 2017, a Motion to Inform was filed with respect to the deadline to object or 

otherwise respond to the Urgent Motion of Debtors for Interim and Final Orders (A) Prohibiting 

Utilities from Altering, Refusing, or Discontinuing Service, (B) Deeming Utilities Adequately 

Assured of Future Performance, (C) Establishing Procedures for Determining Adequate 

Assurance of Payment, and (D) Setting Final Hearing on May 22, 2017 (the “Motion”). 

The deadline to object or otherwise respond to the Motion, which will be addressed at the 

June 28, 2017 Omnibus Hearing, is governed by the Case Management Procedures Order entered 

in these Title III cases. This Order resolves docket entry nos. 257, 258 and 260. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 7, 2017 

 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

 United States District Judge 

 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number 

listed as a bankruptcy case number due to software limitations and the last four (4) digits of each 

Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); and 

(ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3284) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:265 Filed:06/07/17 Entered:06/07/17 09:30:54 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-1 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Pensioners Page 1 of 9Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-1 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Pensioners Page 2 of 9Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-1 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Pensioners Page 3 of 9Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-1 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Pensioners Page 4 of 9Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-1 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Pensioners Page 5 of 9Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-1 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Pensioners Page 6 of 9Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-1 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Pensioners Page 7 of 9Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-1 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Pensioners Page 8 of 9Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4011-1 Filed:10/04/18 Entered:10/04/18 13:20:05 Desc:Exhibit Assignment Agreement for Pensioners Page 9 of 9
#### Farbro Corporation, Appellant, *v.*A. F. A. Realty Corporation, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

(Argued October 6, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*570
      *Charles H. Street*for appellant.

*Benjamin Reass*and *Warren M. Caro*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.; Crane, Ch. J., dissents on the ground that there can be no loches in applying for a remedy when the decisions of the court caused the delay. (See 250 N. Y. 262, 588; 261 N. Y. 24.)