alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 298.36 Limitations on use of business name. ( a ) An air taxi operator or commuter air carrier in holding out to the public and in performing its services in air transportation shall do so only in the name or names in which its air carrier certificate is issued pursuant to section 44702 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII by the Federal Aviation Administration, and in which it is registered with the Department under this part, or in which its Commuter Air Carrier Authorization is issued or other trade name is registered.
( b ) Slogans shall not be considered names for the purposes of this section, and their use is not restricted hereby.
( c ) Commuter air carriers are subject to the provisions of part 215 of this chapter with regard to the use and change of air carrier names.
( d ) Neither the provisions of this section nor the grant of a permission hereunder shall preclude Department intervention or enforcement action should there be evidence of a significant potential for, or of actual, public confusion.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 2, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Community Investment Group, Ltd., Havana, Illinois; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
The Havana National Bank, Havana, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 3, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-11475 Filed 5-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 25.777 Cockpit controls. ( a ) Each cockpit control must be located to provide convenient operation and to prevent confusion and inadvertent operation.
( b ) The direction of movement of cockpit controls must meet the requirements of § 25.779. Wherever practicable, the sense of motion involved in the operation of other controls must correspond to the sense of the effect of the operation upon the airplane or upon the part operated. Controls of a variable nature using a rotary motion must move clockwise from the off position, through an increasing range, to the full on position.
( c ) The controls must be located and arranged, with respect to the pilots' seats, so that there is full and unrestricted movement of each control without interference from the cockpit structure or the clothing of the minimum flight crew (established under § 25.1523) when any member of this flight crew, from 5′2′′ to 6′3′′ in height, is seated with the seat belt and shoulder harness (if provided) fastened.
( d ) Identical powerplant controls for each engine must be located to prevent confusion as to the engines they control.
( e ) Wing flap controls and other auxiliary lift device controls must be located on top of the pedestal, aft of the throttles, centrally or to the right of the pedestal centerline, and not less than 10 inches aft of the landing gear control.
( f ) The landing gear control must be located forward of the throttles and must be operable by each pilot when seated with seat belt and shoulder harness (if provided) fastened.
( g ) Control knobs must be shaped in accordance with § 25.781. In addition, the knobs must be of the same color, and this color must contrast with the color of control knobs for other purposes and the surrounding cockpit.
( h ) If a flight engineer is required as part of the minimum flight crew (established under § 25.1523), the airplane must have a flight engineer station located and arranged so that the flight crewmembers can perform their functions efficiently and without interfering with each other.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-46, 43 FR 50596, Oct. 30, 1978]
[Sac. No. 505.

Department Two.

November 26, 1893.]

#### JOHN BRENNAN, Respondent, v. LAURA A. BRENNAN, Administratrix, et cetera, Appellant.

Action upon Note—Proof of Nonpayment—Production of Note.—In an action on a promissory note, under a denial of the allegation of nonpayment, the production of the note in evidence for plaintiff, without any indorsement of payment thereon, is sufficient *prima facie*proof of nonpayment.

Id.—Possession of Note.—The possession of the note by the attorney for the plaintiff was the possession of the plaintiff.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sierra County. Stanley A. Smith, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Frank R. Wehe, for Appellant.

F. D. Soward, for Respondent.

McFARLAND, J.

Action on a promissory note alleged to have been made by Thomas Brennan, deceased, to the plaintiff. *441The defendant in her answer upon want of information and belief denied that Thomas Brennan executed the note; and on the same ground denied that the whole or any part thereof had not been paid, but averred upon information and belief that the sum of six hundred dollars thereof had been paid in coin, and the sum of two hundred dollars in board and lodging.

At the trial plaintiffs attorney introduced the note sued on in evidence, which had no indorsement whatever of payment, and introduced a witness, William Byan, who testified that the note was in the handwriting of the deceased. This evidence was introduced without objection- Plaintiff then rested; whereupon defendant moved for a nonsuit upon the ground that the evidence on the part of the plaintiff was not sufficient to show that the note had not been paid. The motion was denied; and, defendant declining to offer any evidence, judgment was rendered for plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint. Defendant appeals from the judgment.

The only point insisted upon by appellant here is, that there was not sufficient proof of nonpayment of the note. At comr mon law, and in many of the American states, payment is an affirmative plea on the part of the defendant, and the burden of proving it rests upon him. (2 Greenleaf on Evidence, sec. 516.) if a different rule prevails in California, still it is the law here that the production of the note by plaintiff in such an action, with no indorsement of the payment on it, is sufficient *prima facie*proof of nonpayment. *(Frisch v. Caler,*21 Cal. 71, and *Farmers etc. Bank. v. Christensen,*51 Cal. 571.) The possession of the attorney for plaintiff was the possession of plaintiff.

The judgment is affirmed.

Temple, J., and Henshaw, J., concurred.

Hearing in Bank denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32 (a)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|  
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.

|               |  |                                                                                
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 8, 2005 |  | /s/ Robert S.
    Miller, Jr.                                                  
|               |  |                                                                                
|               |  | Robert S. Miller, Jr.
    Chairman of the Board
    and Chief Executive Officer
# SI E RRA CLUB FOUNDED 18 92

Sep tembe r 18. 2015 Sco ll Mathias Assoc ia t e Direc tor A ir Qualit y Polic y Divi s i on U .S. E nvironmental Protec ti on Agency Research Triangle P ark, NC 2771 1 Re: A ir Di s p ers ion Modeling of L o u isia na Su l fur Dioxide Pollut ion Dear A ss ociate Director Mathias: A ir dispersion modeling recen tl y co nduct e d by Wingra Engineering , S.C. on behalf of th e Sierra Club demonstr ates th a t s ulfu r dioxid e ("S0 2 " ) e mi ss ion s from the Do let Hill s P owe r Stat ion and Bi g Cajun II Generation S ta tion in Louisiana ha ve each caused downwind 

## so 2 ambient air concentrat i o n s to exceed the 75 parts per billion I ati ona l Ambient Ai r Qua lit y Sta nd ard (''NAAQS"), which translates to 196.2 micrograms per cubic meter (" 11g / m3 " ). In particular, u s ing th e mo s t recent ac tual e mi ss io n s data for each fac ili ty, th e mode li ng s how s :

• Dolet Hill s causes concentrations as hi gh as 252.7 11 g/m3 • Big Cajun causes concent rations a s h igh as 254.5 11 g/ m3 T he modeling a lso demonstrates th at the exceedances in the areas s urrounding these facilities are even grea te r when nea rb y sou rc es o f S0 2 are tak e n into acco unt. Accordingly, the area s urrounding Dolct llill s a nd Big Caju n 11 shou ld each be designa ted nonattainment under the AAQS.

**nclosed.** plea se find the r es ult s o r th e mod e li ng a naly s i s, a long wi th the corr espo ndin g modeling input and output files. We urge EPA to cons id e r this information as it undertakes area des i g nations in Loui s iana for the 20 I 0 revised primar y S0 2 NAAQS. This information is being provided

### Mr. Scott Mathi as Septembe r I 8 , 20 15 Page 2

to both EPA R egio n 6 and to appropriate perso nnel at the Loui s iana Department of Env ironm e nt al Quality. Thank yo u for yo ur attention to and considerat ion of thi s matter , and please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like fu rth e r in formation. Sincerely , 

### I

s / Joshua Sm ith Jo s hua S mith S taff Attorney S ierra Club 85 Second St.. Second Floor San Francisco , CA 94 1 08 Phon e: (4 15) 977-5560 Fax : 

### (415) 977-5793 joshua.smith @ s ic rr ac lub. org
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - 10 CFR Part 32 
          - [Docket No. PRM-32-05] 

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

# ACTION:

Denial of petition for rulemaking; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects the denial of a petition for rulemaking filed by Metabolic Solutions published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 24, 2000 (65 FR 21673). The                         **ADDRESSES**                        section of the notice contains language that requests public comment that was inadvertently included in the notice. This action is necessary to indicate that the NRC is not soliciting public comments because the denial is the final NRC action on the petition for rulemaking.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        David L. Meyer, Chief, Rules and                               ( print page 26149)                            Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration, telephone (301) 415-7162.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On page 21673, in the first column, the                     **ADDRESSES**                     section is removed because the NRC is not soliciting public comments and the denial is the final NRC action on this petition for rulemaking.                 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day of May 2000. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

David L. Meyer, 

Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration. 

[FR Doc. 00-11244 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-U
Exhibit 24.3

                               KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



     WHEREAS,  KeySpan  Corporation,  a New York  corporation  (the  "Company"),
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K as prescribed by
said Commission  pursuant to said Act and the rules and regulations  promulgated
thereunder.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in my capacity as a director of the Company,  I do hereby
appoint GERALD LUTERMAN, JOHN J. BISHAR, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and each of
them  severally,  as my  attorneys-in-fact  with power to execute in my name and
place, and in my capacity as a director of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any
amendment  to said  Report  and  any  other  documents  required  in  connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney this 10th day of
March, 2004.





                                                     /s/J. Atwood Ives
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4146 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4146

 To require the Federal Election Commission to conduct a study on the 
          classification of political campaign emails as spam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 2020

  Mr. Merkley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Federal Election Commission to conduct a study on the 
          classification of political campaign emails as spam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Campaign Communications Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF EMAIL FROM POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS.

    (a) Definitions.--For purposes of this section:
            (1) Email provider.--The term ``email provider'' means any 
        person who provides access to electronic mail messages through 
        an account that is--
                    (A) associated with the electronic mail address of 
                a user; and
                    (B) administered by such person.
            (2) Political campaign email.--The term ``political 
        campaign email'' means an electronic mail message from an 
        authorized committee (as defined in section 301 of the Federal 
        Election Campaign Act of 1974 (52 U.S.C. 30101)) of a candidate 
        for Federal office.
    (b) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Federal Election Commission shall 
        conduct a study on the practices and procedures used by email 
        providers with respect to political campaign emails, including 
        the classification of such emails as spam or the assignment of 
        such emails to a separate location apart from other emails 
        regularly received by the user.
            (2) Specifications.--The study conducted under paragraph 
        (1) shall--
                    (A) include multiple email providers that in the 
                aggregate serve a majority of email users;
                    (B) shall not include the collection of any 
                proprietary information.
            (3) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2020, the Federal 
        Election Commission shall submit to Congress a report on the 
        study conducted under paragraph (1). The report provided under 
        this paragraph shall not include any information that can be 
        identified with any individual candidate or authorized 
        committee.
                                 <all>
```
Stephen T. Mangiaracina, Esq. 

5 Salem Road 

Hilton Head Island, SC 29928 

(843) 785-5800 Phone 

(843) 785-4100 Fax 

October 11, 2018 

 

Rob Bishop, Chairman 

Committee of Natural Resources 

U.S. House of Representatives 

123 Cannon Building 

Washington, DC 20515 

RE: Puerto Rico Bankruptcy-Request for Referral to the Department of Justice 

Dear Congressman Bishop: 

 On October 3, 2018 I wrote to you regarding the above. I included letters to Judge Laura 

Taylor Swain dated October 3, 2018, October 1, 2018 and September 20, 2018. 

 Please find enclosed a copy of my letter to Judge Swain, dated today. 

 Again, I ask you to please help. 

 Thank you. 

 Stephen T. Mangiaracina, Esq. 

 5 Salem Road 

 Hilton Head Island, SC 29928 

 (843) 785-5800 Phone 

 (843) 785-4100 Fax 

 Enclosure 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4215-20 Filed:11/13/18 Entered:11/13/18 12:08:37 Desc:

Exhibit October 11 2018 Letter to Rob Bishop Page 1 of 1
180524 ORD GRANTING URG MOT VERSION MAY 24, 2018 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

----------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: PROMESA 

 Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered) 

et al., 

 Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x 

ORDER GRANTING THE URGENT JOINT MOTION 

UNDER CASE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES SEEKING EXTENSION OF DEADLINES

The Court has received and reviewed the Urgent Joint Motion under Case 

Management Procedures Seeking Extension of Deadlines (Docket Entry No. 3132, the “Urgent 

Motion”). The Urgent Motion is hereby granted as set forth herein. 

1. The deadline for the Oversight Board2

 and AAFAF to file the Motion to 

Amend and have it considered at the June Omnibus Hearing is extended to 

May 23, 2018.

3

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3808); and (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth 

of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 9686). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers 

due to software limitations). 

2

 Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning given to 

them in the Urgent Motion. 

3

 The Motion to Amend was filed on CM/ECF on May 23, 2018. (Docket Entry No. 

3133.) 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3135 Filed:05/24/18 Entered:05/24/18 10:40:22 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
180524 ORD GRANTING URG MOT VERSION MAY 24, 2018 2 

2. The Objection Deadline is extended to May 30, 2018 at 12:00 p.m. (Atlantic 

Standard Time). 

3. The Reply Deadline is extended to June 2, 2018 at 12:00 p.m. (Atlantic 

Standard Time). 

This Court retains exclusive jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or 

related to the implementation, interpretation, and enforcement of this Order. This Order resolves 

docket entry no. 3132. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 24, 2018 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

 United States District Judge 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3135 Filed:05/24/18 Entered:05/24/18 10:40:22 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
            AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Pacific  CMA,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Daisy Law,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (c)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (d)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



                                     By:/s/Bill Stangland
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Bill Stangland, Chief Financial Officer


Date:    November 12, 2004
§ 256.1 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to set forth requirements for the display of flight options by electronic airline information systems that provide air carrier or foreign air carrier schedule, fare, or availability information, including, but not limited to, global distribution systems (GDSs), corporate booking tools, and internet flight search tools, for use by consumers, carriers, ticket agents, and other business entities so as to prevent unfair or deceptive practices in the distribution and sale of air transportation.
( b ) Nothing in this part exempts any person from the operation of the antitrust laws set forth in subsection (a) of the first section of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12).