alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5


<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 1st Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                        (3,675)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  7,725
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              (7,725)
<OTHER-SE>                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               0
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       3,675
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      (3,675)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                          (3,675)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          (3,675)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.00)




</TABLE>
#### HENDERSON v. INGE.

(Decided June 30, 1916.)

Appeal from Mobile Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. Saffold Berney.

Ervin & McAleer, for appellant. Francis J. Inge, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed by agreement.
#### LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE R. R. CO. v. HOLMAN.

(Decided June 1, 1915.)

Appeal from Wilcox Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. B. M. Miller.

Jones, Foster & Fields, for appellant. Godbold & Godbold, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed on motion of appellant.
§ 29.521 Float landing conditions. If certification for float operation (including float amphibian operation) is requested, the rotorcraft, with floats, must be designed to withstand the following loading conditions (where the limit load factor is determined under § 29.473(b) or assumed to be equal to that determined for wheel landing gear): ( a ) Up-load conditions in which— ( 1 ) A load is applied so that, with the rotorcraft in the static level attitude, the resultant water reaction passes vertically through the center of gravity; and
( 2 ) The vertical load prescribed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is applied simultaneously with an aft component of 0.25 times the vertical component
( b ) A side load condition in which— ( 1 ) A vertical load of 0.75 times the total vertical load specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is divided equally among the floats; and
( 2 ) For each float, the load share determined under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, combined with a total side load of 0.25 times the total vertical load specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, is applied to that float only.
[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968]
§ 25.105 Takeoff. ( a ) The takeoff speeds prescribed by § 25.107, the accelerate-stop distance prescribed by § 25.109, the takeoff path prescribed by § 25.111, the takeoff distance and takeoff run prescribed by § 25.113, and the net takeoff flight path prescribed by § 25.115, must be determined in the selected configuration for takeoff at each weight, altitude, and ambient temperature within the operational limits selected by the applicant— ( 1 ) In non-icing conditions; and
( 2 ) In icing conditions, if in the configuration used to show compliance with § 25.121(b), and with the most critical of the takeoff ice accretion(s) defined in appendices C and O of this part, as applicable, in accordance with § 25.21(g): ( i ) The stall speed at maximum takeoff weight exceeds that in non-icing conditions by more than the greater of 3 knots CAS or 3 percent of VSR; or
( ii ) The degradation of the gradient of climb determined in accordance with § 25.121(b) is greater than one-half of the applicable actual-to-net takeoff flight path gradient reduction defined in § 25.115(b).
( b ) No takeoff made to determine the data required by this section may require exceptional piloting skill or alertness.
( c ) The takeoff data must be based on— ( 1 ) In the case of land planes and amphibians: ( i ) Smooth, dry and wet, hard-surfaced runways; and
( ii ) At the option of the applicant, grooved or porous friction course wet, hard-surfaced runways.
( 2 ) Smooth water, in the case of seaplanes and amphibians; and
( 3 ) Smooth, dry snow, in the case of skiplanes.
( d ) The takeoff data must include, within the established operational limits of the airplane, the following operational correction factors: ( 1 ) Not more than 50 percent of nominal wind components along the takeoff path opposite to the direction of takeoff, and not less than 150 percent of nominal wind components along the takeoff path in the direction of takeoff.
( 2 ) Effective runway gradients.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-92, 63 FR 8318, Feb. 18, 1998; Amdt. 25-121, 72 FR 44665, Aug. 8, 2007; Amdt. 25-140, 79 FR 65525, Nov. 4, 2014]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130430(40) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130430 COA: 255574 Wayne CC: 03-014112 TEJUAN LAWRENCE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s July 31, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Alice M. Wastie, Respondent, against Tompkins McIlvaine et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

(Argued September 30, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*Charles P. Barre*for appellants.

*Richard W. Townsend*for claimant, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
§ 1214.1101 Announcement. ( a ) Astronaut candidate opportunities Will be announced nationwide and publicized periodically unless specifically canceled by NASA.
( b ) Civilian applicants may apply at any time.
( c ) Military personnel on active duty must apply through and be nominated by the military service with which they are affiliated. Military nominees will not be part of the continuing pool of applicants. The military services will convene their internal selection boards and provide nominees to NASA. The military nominees will be evaluated by NASA and the military services will be notified promptly of those nominees who are finalists.
( d ) The Assistant Administrator for Equal Opportunity Programs, NASA Headquarters, will provide assistance in the recruiting process.
[54 FR 37940, Sept. 14, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 19948, Apr. 23, 2003]
§ 25.1453 Protection of oxygen equipment from rupture. Oxygen pressure tanks, and lines between tanks and the shutoff means, must be— ( a ) Protected from unsafe temperatures; and
( b ) Located where the probability and hazards of rupture in a crash landing are minimized.
OPEN FILE REPORT 79-1116
PLATE 6 OF 8

~] EXPLANATION

2000

OVERBURDEN ISOPACHS - Showing thickness of
overburden, in feet, from the surface to
the top of the Fruitland 1 coal bed.
Isopach interval 200 feet (61 meters).

01893
. DRILL HOLE - Showing thickness of overburden,
XS in feet, from the surface to the top of the
% Fruitland 1 coal bed.

To convert feet to metere, multiply feet
by 0.3048.

O 2224

© 2120

© 2105
© 2059

© 1883

qa aisailatlle

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1963 SCALE 1:24000 Compiled in 1979
1 6 1 MILE
* : =
- 1000 1000 : : 40 5000 006 000 FEET
le e : : :
| i 1 KILOMETER
— J
cae: |] Jea9 ms |
amit
 / NEW MEXICO |

/ |
1/ |
, This map was prepared under contract to the U.S.
Geological Survey and has not been edited for
conformity with Geological Survey editorial stand-
ards. Opinions and conclusions expressed herein

COAL RESOURCE OCCURRENCE MAP OF THE FLORA VISTA QUADRANGLE, ‘coals

SAN JUAN COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
BY PLATE 6
DAM ES & MOORE eta ruanae | coh eee
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 88 (Friday, May 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11211]



[[Page 26223]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-7 (M5) M.
    Date: May 4, 2000.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK/DEA/Review Branch, 2 
Democracy Boulevard, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, MSC 5452, Room# 659, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Lakshmanan Sankaran, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administration, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 659, 6707, Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600 
(301) 594-7799.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-1 (M5).
    Date: May 10, 2000.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6707 Democracy Blv, Two Democracy Plaza, 6th Floor, Room 
641, MSC 5452, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Carolyn Miles, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administration, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 641, 6707, Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
594-7791.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 28, 2000.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-11211 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP98-40-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

:April 28, 2000.
    On March 13 and 28, 2000, the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) 
sponsored two informal settlement conferences for the purpose of 
initiating settlement discussions potentially leading to a resolution 
of all the Kansas ad valorem proceedings. During the March 28 
conference, the participants agreed that settlement negotiations among 
all interested parties should be pursued separately for each pipeline 
involved with the Kansas ad valorem tax refund issues.
    The participants interested in the Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company docket also reached a consensus that the informal settlement 
conference agreed upon should be notices by the Secretary of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) and that the 
Commission's settlement regulations apply to the informal settlement 
process. Consistent with the previous two settlement conferences, the 
Director of the Commission's Dispute Resolution Service and the KCC 
will attend the conference and facilitate the settlement negotiations.
    The informal settlement conference will be held on May 24, 2000, at 
the offices of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, 1 Kansas City Place, 1200 Main 
Street, Kansas City, Missouri. The conference will begin at 10:00 a.m. 
To insure that the facilities are adequately sized all parties that 
plan to attend the settlement conference are requested to contact John 
McNish at 785 271-3218 or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85efabe8e6ebecf6edc5eee6e6abf6f1e4f1e0abeef6abf0f6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d1753101e13140e153d161e1e530e091c091853160e53080e">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
Cynthia King at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ddbeb6b4b3ba9daeb5bff3beb2b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a797173747d5a69727834797577">[email protected]</span></a> by May 11, 2000.
    All interested parties in the above dockets are requested to attend 
the informal settlement conference. If a party has any questions 
respecting the conference, please call Richard Miles, the Director of 
the Dispute Resolution Service. His telephone number is 1 877 FERC ADR 
(337-2237) or 202-208-0702 and his e-mail address is 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9cbd0dad1d8cbdd97d4d0d5dccaf9dfdccbda97dfdcdd97ccca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="790b101a11180b1d571410151c0a391f1c0b1a571f1c1d570c0a">[email protected]</span></a>.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10994 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 29.921 Rotor brake.

If there is a means to control the rotation of the rotor drive system independently of the engine, any limitations on the use of that means must be specified, and the control for that means must be guarded to prevent inadvertent operation.
#### § 1310.7 Communications with the Board.

Communications with the Board shall be conducted through the staff of the Board.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00217

- CV

B RIAN N ORTHCUTT

, M.D.

, Appellant

V

.

R ONNIE C. S TEPHENS AND R ICKY

S TEPHENS

, Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 90t h District Court

of Young County ( 34179 )

January 6, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s order

. It is ordered that the orde r of the trial court is

reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent

with this opinion

.

It is further ordered that Appellee s Ronnie C. Stephens and Ricky Stephens

shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, for wh ich let execution issue.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mike Wallach

___________________ Justice Mike Wallach
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Biological Sciences (1754).                    

*Date & Time:*                         May 18, 19, 2000, 9 a.m.-6 p.m. daily.                    

*Place:*                         Room 380, NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Gerald Selzer, Program Director, Field Stations Marine Laboratory, Division of Biological Infrastructure, Room 615, NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1470.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate Field Stations Marine Laboratories proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 2, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-11272  Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50133

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBERTO SALAZAR-SIERRA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CR-508

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alberto SalazarSierra raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8

U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 24.7

                               KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



     WHEREAS,  KeySpan  Corporation,  a New York  corporation  (the  "Company"),
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K as prescribed by
said Commission  pursuant to said Act and the rules and regulations  promulgated
thereunder.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in my capacity as a director of the Company,  I do hereby
appoint GERALD LUTERMAN, JOHN J. BISHAR, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and each of
them  severally,  as my  attorneys-in-fact  with power to execute in my name and
place, and in my capacity as a director of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any
amendment  to said  Report  and  any  other  documents  required  in  connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney this 10th day of
March, 2004.





                                                     /s/Stephen W. McKessy
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of House of Brussels
  Chocolates Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10- QSB for the period ending July 31,
  2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the "Report"), I, Grant Petersen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

|Date: December 12, 2003 |  | /s/ Grant Petersen     
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |                        
|                        |  | (Signature)            
|                        |  |                        
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  |                        
|                        |  | (Title)                

---
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR if

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1039 PLATE 3

TRUE NORTH

EXPLANATION
POST: DEPOSITS

APPROXIMATE MEAN
DECLINATION 1952

Loose be: id gravel

Relatively thin vent loose gravel wit!
minor amounts of diatomaceous earth in
small blocks

Diatomaceous earth
Chalk white to light buff, massive, and extremely
drab wn or

» silt, and fine-grai
sand in various shades of gray and brown.
Supports sparse growth of trees at outcrop

GLACIAL DEPOSITS

Glaciofluvial outwash
Stratified brown pebble to cobble gravel in a
silty sand matrix. Supports dense growth of
trees and brush

Contact, dashed where approximately located

z,
- ED

082

Auger hole, showing thickness of diatomaceous
earth, in feet

0

Measured section along cliff face, showing
thickness of diatomaceous earth, in feet

1000 Feet
1

1 L 1 i

Contour interval 10 feet

tum is strand line of 18.8-foot high
tide on July 30, 1952

Geology and topography by George Plafker, 1952