alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REASON FOR ISSUE: To introduce a Detailed Inspection of the Engine Support Beam.

ACTION: Add task 53−30−00−155* as follows:

Source Document Ref. No. Chapter 5 Task No. Task Title 

RAS604−990

Rev. G26 4.4.33

53−30−00−155 *

(one star)

Detailed Inspection of the Engine Support Beam 

May 31/2011 5−10−30 Page 1 of 1 PART 2 TR 5−2−47

TEMPORARY REVISION NO. 5−2−47

INSERT IN SECTION 5−10−30

FACING PAGE 15

NOTE: Record the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS 

manual and LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of Part 2.

EFFECTIVITY: ALL
#### § 135.7 Applicability of rules to unauthorized operators.

The rules in this part which apply to a person certificated under part 119 of this chapter also apply to a person who engages in any operation governed by this part without an appropriate certificate and operations specifications required by part 119 of this chapter.

[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-58, 60 FR 65939, Dec. 20, 1995]
#### LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE R. R. R. CO. v. RICHARDS.

(Decided July 19, 1915.)

Appeal from Talladega Circuit Court.'

Heard before Hon. Hugh D. Merrill.

Jones, Foster & Fields, for appellant. Riddle & Burt, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN N. MCCOY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 293 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of March, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### STURDEVANT v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 30, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. Wm. E. Fort.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

No bill of exceptions, no error of record. Affirmed.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      January 17, 2011 | /s/      ALTON L. BOYNTON                                            |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Alton      L. Boynton                                                |
|                        | President      and Chief Executive Officer                           |
|                        | (principal      executive officer and principal accounting  officer) |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
                          PREMIER AUTO TRUST 1998-2
                   FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 1, 1998 (INCEPTION)
                          THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1998
                           FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                   PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X
                                  $ Millions
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                          $        10
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                           832
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    48
<BONDS>                                 794
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            842
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.00
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 89 (Monday, May 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11360]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-255-000]


Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C.; Notice of Request for Waiver

May 2, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 27, 2000, Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C. 
(Petal), tendered for filing a Request for Waiver of the Internet/
interactive web site requirements of the Commission's Order No. 587-I.
    Petal states that it is a small company with only two active 
customers and relatively low volumes. Petal further states that it 
maintains an electronic bulletin board (EBB) for informational postings 
and that none of its customers have requested an interactive web site. 
Petal furthers states that it will agree to implement an interactive 
web site if its customers request it or its business changes 
significantly in the future.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before May 9, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11360 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraSite Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David P. Tomick, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                              /s/ DAVID P. TOMICK
                                              ---------------------------------

                                              David P. Tomick
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              August 14, 2002
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 12, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00646

- CR

Sonny James HERNANDEZ

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial Distr ict Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 07

- 00115

- CRF Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The court reporter responsible for preparing the final portion of the reporter’s record has filed a notification of late record stating that the record has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of th e date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provide d, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of December, 2014

.

____________________________ _______ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 29.863 Flammable fluid fire protection. ( a ) In each area where flammable fluids or vapors might escape by leakage of a fluid system, there must be means to minimize the probability of ignition of the fluids and vapors, and the resultant hazards if ignition does occur.
( b ) Compliance with paragraph (a) of this section must be shown by analysis or tests, and the following factors must be considered: ( 1 ) Possible sources and paths of fluid leakage, and means of detecting leakage.
( 2 ) Flammability characteristics of fluids, including effects of any combustible or absorbing materials.
( 3 ) Possible ignition sources, including electrical faults, overheating of equipment, and malfunctioning of protective devices.
( 4 ) Means available for controlling or extinguishing a fire, such as stopping flow of fluids, shutting down equipment, fireproof containment, or use of extinguishing agents.
( 5 ) Ability of rotorcraft components that are critical to safety of flight to withstand fire and heat.
( c ) If action by the flight crew is required to prevent or counteract a fluid fire (e.g. equipment shutdown or actuation of a fire extinguisher), quick acting means must be provided to alert the crew.
( d ) Each area where flammable fluids or vapors might escape by leakage of a fluid system must be identified and defined.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424), sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Amdt. 29-17, 43 FR 50600, Oct. 30, 1978]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40909

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALFREDO LARRAGA-PEREZ, also known as Alfredo Lara-Perez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:06-CR-140-1

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfredo LarragaPerez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 38.23 Manual information and limitations. ( a ) *Information in manuals.* The following information must be included in any FAA-approved section of a FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual or combination of approved manual material: ( 1 ) Fuel efficiency level established as required by this part; and
( 2 ) Maximum takeoff mass at which fuel efficiency level was established.
( b ) *Limitation.* If the fuel efficiency of an airplane is established at a weight (mass) that is less than the maximum certificated takeoff weight (mass) used to establish the airworthiness of the airplane under this chapter, the lower weight (mass) becomes an operating limitation of the airplane and that limitation must be included in the limitations section of any FAA-approved manual.
#### § 1259.300 Description.

National needs awards may be awarded by the Administrator or designee, Director, NASA Space Grant Program, to meet such needs or problems relating to aerospace identified by the Space Grant Review Panel, by NASA officials, or by any person. NASA may fund such awards in an amount not to exceed 100 percent of the total cost of the program or project.

[82 FR 35441, July 31, 2017]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                        Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Directors of
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control Over Servicing of Securitized Automobile Financing
Receivables that the Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained effective
internal control over servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables
as of December 31, 2001, based upon the criteria for effective internal control
established in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over such functions. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over servicing of the
securitized automobile financing receivables, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over servicing of the securitized automobile
financing receivables to future periods are subject to the risk that internal
control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that, the Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
maintained effective internal control over servicing of securitized automobile
financing receivables as of December 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based upon the criteria for effective internal control established in
"Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 25, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      14,060,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,782,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (398,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,022,000
<PP&E>                                       5,477,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,024,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,747,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,764,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    53,520,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (24,126,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,747,000
<SALES>                                     18,149,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,149,000
<CGS>                                        4,302,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,860,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               317,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (226,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (14,802,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (11,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (14,791,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                476,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (15,267,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.21)


</TABLE>
#### REPUBLIC IRON & STEEL COMPANY v. LIVERY.

(Decided November 23, 1915.)

Appeal from Birmingham City Court.

Heard before Hon. John C. Pugh.

Percy, Benners & Burr, for appellant. Harsh, Harsh & Harsh, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 129]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 288]]

Public Law 114-129
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To provide for the conveyance of land of the Illiana Health Care System 
           of the Department of Veterans Affairs in Danville, 
            Illinois. <<NOTE: Feb. 29, 2016 -  [H.R. 3262]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, DANVILLE, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may 
convey to the Danville Area Community College of Danville, Illinois, all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to certain real 
property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of 
approximately .6 acres known as ``Building Number 48'', which is part of 
the Illiana Health Care System of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
    (b) <<NOTE: Danville Area Community College.>>  Consideration.--As 
consideration for the conveyance under subsection (a), the Danville Area 
Community College shall convey to the United States all right, title, 
and interest of Danville Area Community College in and to certain real 
property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of 
approximately 1.06 acres with a gazebo located approximately 293 feet 
south of the Danville Area Community College Library Building, which is 
part of the Danville Area Community College.

    (c) Condition of Conveyance.--The conveyance under subsection (a) 
shall be subject to the condition that the recipient accept the conveyed 
real property in its condition at the time of the conveyance.
    (d) <<NOTE: Determination.>>  Description of Property.--The exact 
acreage and legal description of the parcels of real property conveyed 
under subsections (a) and (b) shall be determined by surveys 
satisfactory to the Secretary.

    (e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require such 
additional terms and conditions in connection with

[[Page 130 STAT. 289]]

the conveyances under subsections (a) and (b) as the Secretary considers 
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

    Approved February 29, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3262:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Feb. 9, considered and passed House.
            Feb. 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### WILSON v. STEWART & SON.

(Decided January 11, 1916.)

Appeal from Calhoun Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Hugh D. Merrill.

Merrill & Walker, for appellant. Charles F. Douglass, for appellee. ,

Per Curiam.

Affirmed by consent.
Exhibit 24.3


                               KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



     WHEREAS,  KeySpan  Corporation,  a New York  corporation  (the  "Company"),
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K as prescribed by
said Commission  pursuant to said Act and the rules and regulations  promulgated
thereunder.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in my capacity as a director of the Company,  I do hereby
appoint GERALD LUTERMAN, JOHN J. BISHAR, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and each of
them  severally,  as my  attorneys-in-fact  with power to execute in my name and
place, and in my capacity as a director of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any
amendment  to said  Report  and  any  other  documents  required  in  connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney this 21st day of
February, 2007.


                                                       /s/Alan H. Fishman