## Holcim (US) Inc. 4070 Trident Road 

# t'Holcim Three Forks, MT 59752 

# August 12,2009

US EPA
- Region 8 Air Quality Planning Unit Attn: Callie Videtich 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 VIA CERTIFIED US MAIL #7009 0820 0000 3084 0092 

# RE: BART

- CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS CLAIMS 

# Dear Ms. Videtich: This is a response to your letter dated July 14, 2009, regarding confidential business information (CBI) claims on documents contained in our January 25, 2008 and July 22, 2008 submittals. As per our recent conversations, we are willing to retract portions of our CBI claims. However, due to contractual and/or proprietary information contained within those submittals there remains information that must remain confidential. Attached are the noted documents in duplicate. A numerical column has been inserted at the left side of each document to assist in addressing the CBI indentified lines
- this is inclusive of the original as well as the redacted submittals. Specifically the lines of each submittal that must remain confidential are as follows: Submittal Section Line January 25, 2008 Appendix B 2,32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 64, 66, 77, 78 

# &81 Appendix C All July 22, 2008 SNCR-Commercial 52, 54 

# &65 SNCR-Dust Scoop 47,49 

# &60 As shown between the two submittals, those lines that remain CBI have the information removed. As requested per your July 14, 2009 letter, the "Redacted Submittal" are the documents that would be acceptable for public review. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at 406-285-4977 or Eric Ervin 

# at 406-285-3985. Sincerely, 

# 0f"

Environmental Manager

cc: Eric Ervin, Plant Manager
Strength. Performance. Passion.

# CBl Claims August 12, 2009



# ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL

(with numerical column inserted at the left side)

### 2 3 Trident Plant Actual Emissions 4 S02 Emissions (lpy) 

### 5 Airflow (acfm) 6 Production (tpel) 7 8 Direct Costs 9 Purchased Equipment Cost· Scrubber 10 Purchased Equipment Cost
- Waste Water Treatment Plant

11 Total COlt of Scrubber and New Stack 12 

### Total Coat of WaiteWater Treatment Plant 13 Total Capltallnve.tment (TCI) 14 t5 Direct Annual Costs 16 Hours per Year 17 18 Oneratina Labor 19 Operator 

# m 21 22 Maintenance 

## D M H 

## H 

## n Lost Production 

### H

Utilities g 

### M


### U



### G


## « 

# • U Q 50 51



### M



# • • Supervisor (15% ofoperator) Subtotal. Operating labor

Maintenance laborand materials 20% of Purchasln Cost

Costof Lost Production @ $30/100

Electricitv Pump (kW) Fan (kW) Cost ($JkW-hr)

Water Amount Required (Iblhr) Cost

Reaoenl (NaOHI Amount Requlred (tpy) NaoH 

### Cost (50% liq. Caustic soda, $300IT)}

Acid Wash Amount Required (ton/yr) Cost ($/IOn)

Waste Water OisDOsal Slurrvl Amount Required (tpy) Cost ($/IOn)

Slowdown DiscosaJ Costs Amount Required (tonIY') Cost($/IOn) Subtotal, Maintenance

Subtotal. Lost Production

Subtotai, Electr1cily

Subtotal, Water

SUbtotal. Reagent

SublOtal, Acid Wash

Subtotal, Waste Disposal (Slurry)

Subtotal, Waste Disposal (Solids)
Subtotai, Utilities Total Direct Annual Costl



# w 

# •
m 

# n n u H 

# n n IndirectAnnual Costs Overhead (60% of sum of operating, supervisor, maintenance labor & materials) Administrative (2"1) TCI) Property Tax (1 % Tel) Insurance (1% TCI) Capital Recovery '10year 

### lif •. 7 percent Interest) Totallndlreet Annual Cost

Total Annualized Cost (2002 $) Total Annualized Call (2007 SI Pollutant Emll.lon Rate Prior 10 Scrubber lIon. SO,lyr) Pollutant Removed ftons S02"yr) a
.. umlng 95% removal Coat Pet' Ton of Pollut«nt Removed 

# AppendiX B-CONFIDENTIAL543 172959 957.6
$2,073,683

$750,018

$6,223,444 $1,875,045 $8,098,489

7,680
$219,150 $32,873 $252,023
$564740 $584,740
$317 717 $317,717

99 767 $0.0740 Exponential scaling using an exponenl of 0.7 and ratio of Tridenl Kiln 10 Model Plant B nowrale of238,800 acfm in PCA Report I l xponential sealing using an exponenl of 0.2 and ralia 01 Trident Kiln to Model Plant 8 nO'N!'3te of 238,800 adm In PCA Report
l xponential scaltng using an eJ<ponenl of 0.7 and ralio of Trident Kiln 10 Model Plant B nO'N!'ale of 238,800 adm in PCA RePOrt PCA based IheIr value on sum 0' Purc"'ased EqUipment Cost. Direct Installation Cost, Talal Oirec;;t Cost ancl Tol81lncllrecl Cost I Jltponeohal SCaling using an ellPOnenl of 0.2 and ratio of Trldenl Kiln 10 Model P1anl B nowrate of 238,800 acfm In PCA Report

I xpeclecl annual oPeration for PCA coat estimates

I slimate from PCA :CM (and PCA) 

# ,

l slimale based on PCA methOd

I Ratio of PCAvalue at 300,000 tpy produdion to Trident productIon

F atio of PCA value at 236,600 acfm 10 Trident nowrate :alio 01 PCA valUe at 238,800 acfm 10 TrIdent nowrele 

# , ·rident's power contract is $74/MW-hr $492,346

34,592 F:atio of PCAvalue at 238,800 adm 10 Trident flOVvTate :8110 of PCA value al 238,800 acfm to Tridenl nowrate 

# ::::::-'

I Ratio of PCA value at 238,800 acfm 10 Trident nowrale



# ,101 used tor peA

FaM of PCA value al 238.800 ac:fm 10 Trident nowrale Estimale !rom PCA

F:atio of PeAvalue al 238.800 acfm to Trident ftowrate E 51imale from PCA

F 'CA report agreed**~I** OAQP$ CCM percentage PCA report agi"8ed wI OAQPS CCM pel"08ntage F F 'eA report agreed WI QAQPS CCM percentage F 'CA report agreed wI OAQPS CCM percentage F 'CA repor\ agreed wI OAOPS CeM r!tCOvery eql.lalion

l'002 Price 

# , SCaled based on inflation t6 napresenl 2007 values (PeA used 2002). Col1QJmer Pri08lnc1ex Annual Avg tram 2002

## =179.910 June 2007

.. 206.352 l sed actual emissiol\S from 2002 867

# rs~g::::

50.00

$0
1,203 5250.00 $300,759

34,693 $5.00 $173,466
$1,504,931 S2,639,411

$490,058 $181,970 $80,985 $80,985 $1,153,043 $1,987,040
$4,606,451 S5,334,982.21 543 516 $10,342 71

# Appendix C

2 

# -CONFIDENTIAL­ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Trident Facllitv Fuel Consumption Scenarios 40'10 PetCoke!

### 60'10 Coal BASEUNE 11 s 

# _ .....



# .... ........ "'0


# ...... Emissions lpy 12 PetColo:.e 21,700 metric tons @ 5.30% 

### 40'1. 1521 tons of uncontrolled sulfur 71% 13042 Ions 01 502

### '<om coke 14 13 Current Coal 53,000 mebic tons @ 0.10% 

### 60'1. 424 tons 01 uncontroned sulfur 22% 841 tons of 502 from coal 15 TOTAL: 81,700 1945 total sulfur= 3890 tons of502 

# I

Estimated fuet consumption based off ofproducing 2'9.953 metrictons ofclinker per year. 6,613.9 E+6 UouleslMton cllnker))( 289,953 (Mton cllnkerlyr) 

### = 1.9155 E+15 (Jouleslyr) =>1.9155E+15 (JouJes/Yr) J1055.06 (JouJesIBtu) II: 1.'" E+12 (Btulyr) ::::11'=>14 16 17 16 0'10 Pet Coke! 

### 100'10 Coal Scenario 19 Pet Coke o metre tons @ 5.30% 

### 0'10 0 tons of uncontrolled sulfur 0% Ions of502

### '<om coke 

# I 0 Current Coal 92.000 metric tons @ 0.10% 100'10 736 tons of uncontrolled sulfur 100% 1472 tons of502 from coal 21 20 TOTAL: 92.000 736 total sutfur

## = 1472 tons of502 

# I

22 23 5.3% S Pet Coke Current PetCoke

Current Coal TOTAL:
3.5%S Pet Coke CurrentPetCoke

Current Coal TOTAL:
2.9%S Pet Coke CurrentPet Coke

Current Coal TOTAL: 

### 25'10 Pet Coke! 

### 75'1. \;oal Scenarios 24 25 51% 1537 tons of 502 from coke 14,500 metrictllns @ 5.30% 25% 769 tons of uncontrolled sutfur 42% 1120 tons of502 from coal 27 26 70,000 metrictons @ 0.10% 75% 560 tons of uncontrolled sulfur 84.500 1329 total sulfur = 2657 tons of502 28 29 30 41% 1015 tons of502 from coke 31 14,500 metric tons @ 3.50% 25% 506 tons ofuncontrolled sulfur 52% 1120 tons of 502 from coal 32 70,000 metric IOns @ 

## o.ao% 75% 560 tons of uncontrolled sulfur 84,500 1068 total sulfur = 2135 tons of502 33 34 35 43% 141 tons of502 from coke 36 14,500 metric tons @ 2.90% 25% 421 tons of uncontrolled sutfur 1120 tons ofS02 from coal 37 70,000 mebiCtons @ 0.10% 751'. 560 tons of uncontrolled sutfur 57% 84,500 981 total sutfur

### = 1961 ton. of502 38 39 40 41 Current Cost of 5.3% Sulfur Pet Coke from Billings 

## = $27.83 IMT <-Current 42 Conoco 3.5% Sulfur Pet Coke 

### from California ;:: $123 IMT**<~-Option** 1 43 Chevron 2.9% Sulfur Pel Coke Salt Lake City;:: $233 

### IMT <-0 tion2 44 45 Cost of

## o.a-/_ Sulfur coal from E. Montana;::

# I $4122 15T 

# =1 $37.39 

### IMT <-·-Current 

# I 46 47

48 49 50 51 52 53 

### 40'1. Coke 60% Coal Opllon BASEUNE Consumption Sulfur Annual S02fJom Reduction Reduction Estimated Fuel ConsumDtlon Fuel

# met~c~~ewr\ Content % Cost/MT Cost lBo.ellnel fuel (Ipy) InS02

### llon/Y~ in S02 ('I) Estimated Baseline Coke Pet Coke 28700 5.30% $27.83 $ 798721 3042 

# - Estimated Baseline Coal Coal 53000 0.80% $37.39 $ 1981890 848


# - Estimated Total Fuel Annualized Cost $ 2,780611

54

55 56 57 58 

### 25-;. oke 

### 75'10 Coal Ootion.

Ootlons Fuel Pet Coke Pet Coke Pet Coke Consumption 

### ofcoke (metric tons/yr) 

### Sulfur Content



### 1'10) CosUMT Annual Coke Cost 502 from fuel (lpv) 

### Reduction In 502 (ton/vr) Reductio n in 502



### 1'1.) Coke Ootion 1 14,500 5.30% $27.83 $403,535 2657.0 0 0% Coke Option 2 14.500 3.50% $123.00 $1,783,500 21350 522.0 20% Coke Option 3 14.500 2.90% $233.00 $3,378,500 1961.0 696.0 

### 26% 

# . 59 Note. Annuahzed Cost or 7511o coal

- 

# - 70.000 metnc tonslyr)t; $37.39JMT

- 

# - $2,617 .591/yr. ThiS cost IS In addition to the coke cost above and IS Included in the cost analysis table below

. 64 65

66 67 

### 0'1. Coke 1001', Coal Oation.

Oollon. Fuel Consumption ofcoal (metrictonslyr) Sulfur Content

(',,) CosVMT Annual Fuel Cost 502from fuel Itpy) Reduction inS02 (tonlyr) Reduction inS02



### 1%) Coal Option 1 Coal 92,000 0.80% $ 37.39 $3,440,262 1472.0 0 0% 68 69 70 

## Cost Analysis for Fuel Switchina ODtions 71
72 73

74
75

76

77 78 79 Gates 

### of the Mountains 502 502 Cost Incremental 502 

### Deciviews Cost Control Ontion Annualized Cost\ Efficiencv 10/.) f1blhr) Itov) Tons Removed 1$/ton) ($lIon) Impact (24 hr
- t.) ($Ide) Incremental 

### ($Ide) Using 100% Coal $659.651 62% 5 22 35 $18,637 -$357.090 1.290 0.0065 $101,065,920 -$1,936,447,863 Option 3: Using 25% Coke with a2.9% Sulfur $3,215.480 50% 7 29 28 $113,874 $626.276 1.291 0.0052 $617.520,160 $3,396.206,349 Content Optkm 2: Using 25% Coke with a 3.5% Sulfur $1,620,480 45% 7 31 26 $63,077 $180,614 1.292 0.0047 $342,057.878 $979,445,328 Con1ent Option 1 ;Using 25% Coke wilh a 5.3% Sutfur $240,515 32% 9 39 18 $13,325


# - 1.293 0.0033 $72.258,780


# - Content Baseline2; Using 40% Cokewith a 5.3% Sulfur $0 0% 13 57 0 

# - - 1.297 

# -- - -- Content



# - AnnualIZed cost
- Option Cost
- Baseline Cost 'The baseline is based 

### offthe 2007 CEM's dala that averaged 13.1 Ibslhrof 502. This IS calculated to be 57 lons/yr. which is 69.5% lowever than the permilled limit.

## 5

10

15



## 20



## 25

30

35



## 40



## 45

50



## 55

60

65
----



## 1 

## 2 

## 3 4 

# Holcim US, Inc. Trident Facility Commercial Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction
6 

# Cost Item Factor 

# DIRECT COSTS 7 

# Purchased equipment costs 8 

# SNCR License Fees SNCR Equipment 9
11 

# Variable Frequency Drive Modifications 12 

# Non-quoted Mechanical Equipment (mixing tanks, pumps, etc.) 13 

# Electrical Equipment 14 

# Purchased equipment sum Freight 17 

## 16 

# Purchased equipment cost, PEC 18 19 

# DIRECT INSTALLATION COSTS Foundations & supports
- civil work Handling & erection 21 

## 22 

# Mid Kiln Injection Port Installation 23 

# Direct installation costs 24 

# Total Direct Costs, DC 26 27 

# INDIRECT INSTALLATION COSTS, IIC 28 

# Engineering 29 

# Commissioning Tech Support and Training 31 

# Contingencies 32 

# Total Indirect Costs, IIC 33 34 

# Total Capital Investment

# =DC 

# + IIC
36



## 37 

# Cost Item DIRECT ANNUAL COSTS 38 

# Operating Labor 39 Operator 540 man hrs I $30.00 Ihr 41 Note: 0.5 hrs/shift x 3 shifts/day x 360 dayslyr 

## 42 

# Supervisor 15% of operator 43 

# Maintenance 44 

# Labor 540 man hrs I $30.00 Ihr Note: 0.5 hrs/shift x 3 shifts/day x 360 dayslyr 

# 200,000 200,000

20,000 266,000

70,000 

# 756,000 37,800 

# 793,800
25,000 200,000

35,000 

# 260,000 1,053,800

110,000 40,000 40,000 69,000 

# 259,000 $1,312,800**~ell!cuve** 

## NonCatalytic Reduction Cost


# $16,200

$2,430 $16,200 $16,200
$13,128
$379,183· I-­ 

# $443,341

$30,618 $26,256 $13,128 $13,128 $144,408 

# $227,538 $670,879 (A) 0.05(A) (B) ;:

(C) (B+C)

46 

# Material 100% of main!. labor 47 48 

# Utilities (Assumed) 49 

# Electricity (1 % of Capital Cost)
51 

## 52 

# Reagent 53 54 

# Total Direct Annual Costs, DAC
56 

# INDIRECT ANNUAL COSTS 

# 57 Overhead (60% of total operating & maintenance costs) 58 

# Administrative Charges 59 

# Property Taxes Insurance 61 

# Capital Recovery Factor (15 yrs at 7%) 62 

# Total Capital Cost 63 

# Total Indirect Annual Costs, lAC 64 

# TOTAL ANNUAL COST 2% ofTCI 1% of TCI 1% of TCI 0.11 $1,312,800

## 5



# 10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50



## 55

60 

# 32

1 

# 2 

# Holcirn US, Inc. Trident Facility 3 

## 4 

# Dust Scoops Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction System
6 7 

# I Factor 

# I 8 

## 9
11 

# 12 13 14 

# 16 17 

# 18 19 21 22 23 24 

# 26 27 

# 28 29 31 DIRECT COSTS Purchased equipment costs Mechanical Equipment Electrical Equipment Purchased equipmentsum Freight Purchased equipment cost, PEC DIRECT INSTALLATION COSTS Foundations & 

# supports
- civil work Handling & 

# erection Direct installation costs Total Direct Costs, DC INDIRECT INSTALLA1"'ON COSTS,IIC Engineering Contingencies Total Indirect Costs, IIC Total Caoitallnvestment

# =DC 

# + IIC (A) 0.05(A) (B) 

# =

(C) (B+C) 266,000 70,000 336,000 16,800 352,800
25,000 200,000 225,000 577,800
110,000 29,000 139,000 $716,800

",,,,,,<;llve ,.UII

## Catalytic Reduction Cost 

## 33 34 

# 36 37 

# 38 39
41 

## 42 43 

# DIRECT ANNUAL COSTS Operating Labor Operator Supervisor Maintenance Labor Material Utilities (Assumed) 540 man hrs $30.00 /hr Note: 0.5 hrs/shift x 3 shifts/day x 360 days/yr 

# 15% ofoperator 540 man hrs $30.00 /hr Note: 0.5 hrs/shift x 3 shifts/day x 360 days/yr 

# 100% of maint. labor

44 

# Electricity (1% of Capital Cost)
46 

## 47 

# Reagent 48 

# 49 

# Total Direct Annual Costs, DAC 51 INDIRECT ANNUAL COSTS 52 Overhead (60% oftotal operating & 

# maintenance costs) 53 

# Administrative Charges 54 

# Property Taxes Insurance 56 Capital Recovery Factor (15 yrs at 7%) 57 

# Total Capital Cost 58 Total IndirectAnnual Costs, lAC 59 TOTAL ANNUAL COST 2% ofTCI 1% ofTCr 1% ofTCI 0.11 $716,800 $16,200 $2,430 $16,200 $16,200

$7,168
$379,183 $437,381

$30,618 $14,336

$7,168 $7,168 $78,848 $138,138 $575,519

# CBI Claims August 12, 2009



# REDACTED SUBMITTAL
(documents that would be acceptable for public review)

# Appendix B 2 3 4 5 

### 6 7 6 9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Trident Plant Actual Emissions S02 Emissions (lpy) AlrIIow (acfm) Production (lpd) Direct Costs Purchased Equipment Cost Scrubber Purchased Equipment Cost Waste Water Treatment Plant

Total Cost of Scrubber and New Stack Total COlt of Waste Water Treatment Plant Total Capltallnv8atment (rCI)
Direct Annual Costs

Hours per Year Operating Labor 19 

# m 21 

## D Maintenance



### V Lost Production 

## n 

# w Utilities 

## n M



# • H
41 

### G 

## a « 45 

### U g 

## W M
54

54 Operator Suoervisor 115% ofooerator Subtotal, Operating Labor
Maifltenance labor and materials 20 1 %of Purchasin Cost Subtotal, Maintenance

Cost of Lost Production @ $30/10n

Water Subtotal. Lost Production

Amount Required (tb/hr) Cost Subtotal. Water Reaoent (NaOHl Amount Required (lpy) NaOH Cost (50% IiQ. Caustic soda, $300fT)) Subtotal, Reagent Acid Wash Amount Required (ton/yr) Cost ($I1on) Subtotal, Acid Wash Waste Water DisDosal S]unv) Amount Required (tpy) Cost ($/Ion) Sublotal, Waste Disposal (Slurry) Slowdown DisQQsal Costs Amount Required (tonfyr) Cost ($/Ion) SubtotaL Waste Disposal (Solids)



# n n n



# n n n Indirect Annual Costs Overhead (60% of sum of operating, supervisor, maintenance labor & materials) Administrative (2% Tel) Property 

### Tax (1 'Yo 7el) Insurance (1% Tel) Caoital Recovery (10 year life 7 Dercent interest) Total Indirect Annual Cost

Pollutant Emission Rate Prior to Scrubber (tons SOhr) Pollutant**Remo~d** (tons SOzlyr) assuming 95% removal 543 172959 957.6
$2,073,683 I xponential scaling using an exporMtnt of 0,7 and ratio 01 Trident Kiln to Model Plant 8 nowrale 01 238,800 acfm in PCA RepOrt

$750,018 Exponential scaling using an exporMtnt 01 0.2 and ratio or Trident Kiln 10 Model Planl 8 nowrate of 238,800 acfm in PGA RepOrt xponenliat scaling Using an exponent of0.7 and ratio ofTrident Kiln to Model Plant 8 f1o'M"ate of 238,800 acfm in PCA RepOrt. PCA based $8,223,444 heir value on sum of Purchased Equipment Cost, Direct Installation Cost, Total Direct Cost and Tolallndirecl Gost $1,875,045 xponenlial scaling using an exponent of 0,2 and raUo 01 Trident Kiln 10 Model Plant B nO'M"ale 0' 238,800 ac1'm in PCA Report $8,098,489

7,680 I xpected annual operation for PeA cost estimates
$219,150 I slimale from PeA $32873 ( CM{and PCA) $252,023



# , 5564740 stlmate based on PCA method $564,740



# , $317 717 atio of peA value at 300,000 tpy production to Trident production $317,717



# ,

34,592 atlo 01 PGA value a1238,800 acfm to Trident f1o'M"ate alio of PeA value at 238,800 actm 10 Trident nO'M"ate

# ~~::::~_ F



# ,alio of PCA value at 238,800 acfm to Trident f10wrale



# , Not used for PeA



# , alio of PCA value at 238,800 acfm to Trident nO'M"ale shmate rrom PGA

Ratio 01 PeA value at 238,800 acfm to Trident nowrale slimate from PGA

PGA repOrt agreed wi OAQPS GGM percentage PCA reporl agreed Wi OAQPS GGM percentage PeA repon agreed wi OAQPS GGM percentage PCA reporl agreed wI OAQPS GGM percentage PCA reporl agreed wi OAQPS GGM recovery eQuation



# , Used actual emissions from 2002 867

# :~~::::

$0.00

$0
1,203 "'250.00 I

I $300,759

34,693 $5.00 I $173,466

$490,058 $161.970 $80,985 $60.985 $1 153043 $1,967,040

543 518 71

# Appendix C

2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15



# ,. '8 17 

# ,. 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 J4 J5 38 37 38 

## 3' 40 41 42 43 44


# .. 45 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 

## 5' 80 51 82 63 54 55 68 57 58
89 70

71

72

73

74 75 78 77 78 79

## 5

10

15



## 20

25

30

35



## 40



## 45

50

55

60

65

1 

## 2 3 

## 4 

# Holcim US, Inc. Trident Facility Commercial Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction
6 

# Cost Item Factor 7 

## 8 9
11 

## 12 13 

## 14
16 17 

## 18 19
21 

## 22 

## 23 24 

## 26 27 28 29
31 

## 32 33 34
36



## 37 38 

## 39
41 42 43 

## 44 

## 46 47 48 49
51 

## 52 53 

## 54
56 

## 57 58 

## 59
61 

## 62 63 

## 64 

# DIRECT COSTS Purchased equipment costs SNCR License Fees SNCR Equipment Variable Frequency Drive Modifications Non-quoted Mechanical Equipment (mixing tanks, pumps, etc.) Electrical Equipment Purchased equipment sum Freight Purchased equipment cost, PEC DIRECT INSTALLATION COSTS Foundations 

# &supports
- civil work Handling 

# &erection Mid Kiln Injection Port Installation Direct installation costs Total Direct Costs, DC INDIRECT INSTALLATION COSTS,IIC Engineering Commissioning Tech Support and Training Contingencies Total Indirect Costs, IIC Total Capital Investment

# =DC 

# + IIC

Cost Item**~electlve** 

## ....onCatalytic Reduction Cost



# Utilities (Assumed) Electricity (1 % of Capital Cost)

INDIRECT ANNUAL COSTS Overhead (60% of total operating 

# &maintenance costs) Administrative Charges Property Taxes Insurance Capital Recovery Factor (15 yrs at 7%) Total Capital Cost Total IndirectAnnual Costs, lAC DIRECT ANNUAL COSTS

Operating Labor Operator Supervisor Maintenance Labor Material 540 man hrs I $30.00 /hr Note: 0.5 hrslshift x 3 shifts/day x 360 days/yr 

# 15% of operator 540 man hrs I 

# $30.00 /hr Note: 0.5 hrslshift x 3 shifts/day x 360 days/yr 

# 100% of maint. labor

2% ofTCI 1% ofTCI 1% of TCI 0.11 $1,312,800 $16,200 $2,430 $16,200 $16,200
$13,128

$30,618 $26,256 $13,128 $13,128 $144,408 $227,538 (A) 200,000 200,000

20,000 266,000

70,000 756,000 

# 0.05(A) (B)

# = 37,800 793,800



# (C) 25,000 200,000

35,000 260,000 

# (B+C) 1,053,800


# 110,000 40,000 40,000 69,000 259,000 

# $1,312,800

# 5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60



## 1 

# 2 3 4
6 

## 7 

## 8 9
11 12 13 14
16 17 18 19
21 

# 22 23 24
26 27 28 29 31 

# Holcim US, Inc. Trident Facility Dust Scoops Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction System

Factor 

# Cost Item DIRECT COSTS Purchased equipment costs Mechanical Equipment Electrical Equipment Purchased equipment sum (A) Freight Purchased equipment cost. PEC 0.05(A) (B) 

# = DIRECT INSTALLATION COSTS Foundations 

# &supports
- civil work Handling 

# &erection Direct installation costs (C) 

# Total Direct Costs, DC (B+C) 

# INDIRECT INSTALLATION COSTS, IIC Engineering Contingencies Total Indirect Costs, IIC Total Capital Investment

# =DC 

# + IIC

32 33 

# DIRECTANNUAL COSTS 34


## 36 37 38 39
41 42 43 44
46 47 48 49
51 

# Operating Labor Operator Supervisor Maintenance Labor Material Utilities (Assumed) Electricity (1 % of Capita

INDIRECT ANNUAL COSTS l Cost)

52 53 

## 54
56 57 58 59 

# Administrative Charges Property Taxes Insurance Cost Item

540 man hrs $30.00 Note: 0.5 hrs/shift x 3 shifts/day x 360 days/yr 

# 15% of operator 540 man hrs $30.00 Note: 0.5 hrs/shift x 3 shifts/day x 360 days/yr 

# 100% of maint. labor 

# fhr

/hr

Overhead (60% of total operating 

# & maintenance costs) 2% ofTCI 1% ofTCI 1% ofTCI Capital Recovery Factor (15 yrs at 7%) 0.11 Total Capital Cost $716,800 Total IndirectAnnual Costs, lAC 266,000 70,000 336,000 

# 16,800 352,800


# 25,000 200,000 225,000 577,800


# 110,000

29,000 139,000 

# $716,800

""""CLIVI' 'UII

## Catalytic Reduction Cost


# $16,200

$2,430 $16,200 $16,200

$7,168

$30,618 $14,336

$7,168 $7,168 $78,848 

# $138,138