alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2973-2974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: January 14, 2000.
    Time: 12 pm to 1 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20982, (telephone Conference Call).

[[Page 2974]]

    Contact Person: Henry J. Haigler, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Rm. 6150, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301/443-7216.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 11, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-1143 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MELODY KEMSLEY, an individual, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General 

of the United States Postal Service, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 19-55856

D.C. No. 

2:19-cv-00067-RGK-MAA 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 19, 2020

Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and IMMERGUT,** District 

Judge.

Plaintiff Melody Kemsley appeals the district court’s order granting 

Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Title VII. We review 

the grant or denial of a motion to dismiss de novo. Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. v. Fed.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Karin J. Immergut, United States District Judge for the 

District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

FILED

DEC 24 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

Ins. Co., 869 F.3d 795, 800 (9th Cir. 2017). We review the district court’s dismissal

with prejudice for abuse of discretion. Salameh v. Tarsadia Hotel, 726 F.3d 1124, 

1129 (9th Cir. 2013). 

The availability of protection under Title VII’s “participation clause” requires 

“the underlying discrimination ... be reasonably perceived as discrimination

prohibited by Title VII.” Learned v. City of Bellevue, 860 F.2d 928, 932 (9th Cir. 

1988). The district court properly concluded that Kemsley’s EEOC complaint’s 

claim that she was fired for identifying leave-use violations did not qualify as 

“protected activity” under Title VII’s broad categories of race, color, religion, sex, 

or national origin. 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a)(1), 2000e-3(a). 

Kemsley now maintains that her complaint noted that her EEOC action was 

not entirely predicated on the leave-use violations, but rather leave-use violations 

“among other things.” Acknowledging this aspect of her complaint “admittedly 

lack[s] specificity,” Kemsley’s brief on appeal still does not disclose exactly what 

those “other things” are, and insists Kemsley should have been given leave to amend. 

Because the record before both this court and the district court is completely devoid 

of any specific claimed protected activity, the district court did not abuse its 

discretion in dismissing with prejudice. See Kendall v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 518 F.3d 

1042, 1052 (9th Cir. 2008) (“Appellants fail to state what additional facts they would 

plead if given leave to amend .... Accordingly, amendment would be futile.”). “A 
3 

plaintiff may not in substance say ‘trust me,’ and thereby gain a license for further 

amendment when [provided] prior opportunity” to explain those facts. Salameh, 726 

F.3d at 1133 (finding no abuse of discretion to deny leave to amend where plaintiff 

failed to identify facts that could cure deficiencies). The district court properly 

dismissed Kemsley’s complaint with prejudice.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         1061554
<NAME>                        Voxcom Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                          8,136,585
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   199,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (30,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     1,286,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                9,636,816
<PP&E>                                          155,464
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,665,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           902,153
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     8,000,000
<COMMON>                                        1,577
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,761,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,665,647
<SALES>                                         397,989
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                397,989
<CGS>                                           185,235
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,077,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76,971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,865,677)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,865,677)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1,494,978)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,360,655)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.60)



</TABLE>
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, David J Cutler, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Multi-Link Telecommunications, Inc., (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10QSB for the nine months ended June 30, 2002
of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1034, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  October 4, 2004





By /s/David J Cutler
   ------------------------------
   David J Cutler
   Chief Executive Officer
   Chief Financial Officer




4

2
Exhibit 23.2

                CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

As  independent  petroleum  consultants to The Houston  Exploration  Company and
KeySpan Exploration and Production,  LLC, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report included in this form 10-K of KeySpan Corporation and into KeySpan
Corporation's  previously filed  Registration  Statements File Nos.:  333-53657,
333-53765,   333-920003,   333-79151,   333-40472,   333-43768,  333-60294,  and
333-82230.

                                     NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.





                                     By: \s\Danny D. Simmons
                                         -------------------
                                          Danny D. Simmons
                                          Executive Vice President


Houston, Texas
March 14, 2003
§ 25.979 Pressure fueling system. For pressure fueling systems, the following apply: ( a ) Each pressure fueling system fuel manifold connection must have means to prevent the escape of hazardous quantities of fuel from the system if the fuel entry valve fails.
( b ) An automatic shutoff means must be provided to prevent the quantity of fuel in each tank from exceeding the maximum quantity approved for that tank. This means must— ( 1 ) Allow checking for proper shutoff operation before each fueling of the tank; and
( 2 ) Provide indication at each fueling station of failure of the shutoff means to stop the fuel flow at the maximum quantity approved for that tank.
( c ) A means must be provided to prevent damage to the fuel system in the event of failure of the automatic shutoff means prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) The airplane pressure fueling system (not including fuel tanks and fuel tank vents) must withstand an ultimate load that is 2.0 times the load arising from the maximum pressures, including surge, that is likely to occur during fueling. The maximum surge pressure must be established with any combination of tank valves being either intentionally or inadvertently closed.
( e ) The airplane defueling system (not including fuel tanks and fuel tank vents) must withstand an ultimate load that is 2.0 times the load arising from the maximum permissible defueling pressure (positive or negative) at the airplane fueling connection.
[Amdt. 25-11, 32 FR 6913, May 5, 1967, as amended by Amdt. 25-38, 41 FR 55467, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29785, July 20, 1990]
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
24/7 Real Media, Inc.:

    We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-89985, 333-34020 and 333-47074) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-66995,
333-83287, 333-35306, 333-56308, 333-87714 and 333-100582) on Form S-8 of 24/7
Real Media, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2002, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash
flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2001 Annual Report on Form
10-K/A dated January 24, 2003 of 24/7 Real Media, Inc.

    Our report dated March 29, 2002, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations since
inception and has a working capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
that uncertainty.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
January 24, 2003
§ 29.493 Braked roll conditions. Under braked roll conditions with the shock absorbers in their static positions— ( a ) The limit vertical load must be based on a load factor of at least— ( 1 ) 1.33, for the attitude specified in § 29.479(a)(1); and
( 2 ) 1.0, for the attitude specified in § 29.479(a)(2); and
( b ) The structure must be designed to withstand, at the ground contact point of each wheel with brakes, a drag load of at least the lesser of— ( 1 ) The vertical load multiplied by a coefficient of friction of 0.8; and
( 2 ) The maximum value based on limiting brake torque.
§ 382.91 What assistance must carriers provide to passengers with a disability in moving within the terminal? ( a ) As a carrier, you must provide or ensure the provision of assistance requested by or on behalf of a passenger with a disability, or offered by carrier or airport operator personnel and accepted by a passenger with a disability, in transportation between gates to make a connection to another flight. If the arriving flight and the departing connecting flight are operated by different carriers, the carrier that operated the arriving flight (*i.e.,* the one that operates the first of the two flights that are connecting) is responsible for providing or ensuring the provision of this assistance, even if the passenger holds a separate ticket for the departing flight. It is permissible for the two carriers to mutually agree that the carrier operating the departing connecting flight (*i.e.,* the second flight of the two) will provide this assistance, but the carrier operating the arriving flight remains responsible under this section for ensuring that the assistance is provided.
( b ) You must also provide or ensure the provision of assistance requested by or on behalf of a passenger with a disability, or offered by carrier or airport operator personnel and accepted by a passenger with a disability, in moving from the terminal entrance (or a vehicle drop-off point adjacent to the entrance) through the airport to the gate for a departing flight, or from the gate to the terminal entrance (or a vehicle pick-up point adjacent to the entrance after an arriving flight). ( 1 ) This requirement includes assistance in accessing key functional areas of the terminal, such as ticket counters and baggage claim.
( 2 ) This requirement also includes a brief stop upon the passenger's request at the entrance to a rest room (including an accessible rest room when requested). As a carrier, you are required to make such a stop only if the rest room is available on the route to the destination of the enplaning, deplaning, or connecting assistance and you can make the stop without unreasonable delay. To receive such assistance, the passenger must self-identify as being an individual with a disability needing the assistance.
( c ) As a carrier at a U.S. airport, you must, on request, in cooperation with the airport operator, provide for escorting a passenger with a service animal to an animal relief area provided under § 382.51(a)(5) of this part.
( d ) As part of your obligation to provide or ensure the provision of assistance to passengers with disabilities in moving through the terminal (*e.g.,* between the terminal entrance and the gate, between gate and aircraft, from gate to a baggage claim area), you must assist passengers who are unable to carry their luggage because of a disability with transporting their gate-checked or carry-on luggage. You may request the credible verbal assurance that a passenger cannot carry the luggage in question. If a passenger is unable to provide credible assurance, you may require the passenger to provide documentation as a condition of providing this service.
## Support Documents for

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on

Premanufacture Notice (PMN)

P-02-833

EPA Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPPT -2011-0577

## Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for

PMN P-02-833

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for

PMN P-02-833

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for

PMN P-02-833

## A-001

Str ucture Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-02-833

## A-002

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-02-833REVISED on 3-31-03

This revision is based on the additional information from the company

dated March 18, 2003. Changes are in bold.

PMN: 02-0833 ENGINEER: Jon/JB

PV (kg/yr): (Import only) SUBMITTER: Ciba Specialty

Chemicals Corporation

USE: Polymerization initiator and regulator for thermoplastics and

elastomers.

OTHER USES: none found

MSDS: Yes Label: No

General Eqp.: Provide ventilation, wear coveralls, wear

chemical goggles, wear impervious gloves.

Respirator: Wear dust mask or respirator in conditions where

dust arises from use.

Health Effects: None, inhalation toxicity not completed

TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials): Not established

CRSS:

Chemical Category:

VP: <1E-6 torr @25  C

S-H 2 O: 0 004 g/L

MW:

Phys State: Neat: Solid

Proc/Form: ;

End Use:

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns):

Migration to Groundwater = negligible

PBT Potential = P2B2T1

Health: 1-2 (inhalation, dermal, ingestion, drinking water)

Eco: 3 (all releases to water)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2REVISED (3-31-03) ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 2

PMN: 02-0833

ASSUMPTIONS:

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None listed

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW NoINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 3

PMN: 02-0833

PROC/USE:

Site/Location: (submission)

Days/yr: (submission)

Process Description:

Note:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.):

Basis:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 4

PMN: 02-0833

PROC/USE: con’t

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE

Tot. # of workers:

Days/yr: (submission)

INHALATION:

150 mg/day over

Number of w

Basis:

Dermal: c : 3,100 mg/day

Basis:

## A-003

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P-02-833
§ 27.1581 General. ( a ) *Furnishing information.* A Rotorcraft Flight Manual must be furnished with each rotorcraft, and it must contain the following: ( 1 ) Information required by §§ 27.1583 through 27.1589.
( 2 ) Other information that is necessary for safe operation because of design, operating, or handling characteristics.
( b ) *Approved information.* Each part of the manual listed in §§ 27.1583 through 27.1589, that is appropriate to the rotorcraft, must be furnished, verified, and approved, and must be segregated, identified, and clearly distinguished from each unapproved part of that manual.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Table of contents.* Each Rotorcraft Flight Manual must include a table of contents if the complexity of the manual indicates a need for it.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c) of the Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Amdt. 27-14, 43 FR 2325, Jan. 16, 1978]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

P.J.A.,

Petitioner

v.

H.C.N.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 335 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of August, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 24.8


                              KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



     WHEREAS,  KeySpan  Corporation,  a New York  corporation  (the  "Company"),
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K as prescribed by
said Commission  pursuant to said Act and the rules and regulations  promulgated
thereunder.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in my capacity as a director of the Company,  I do hereby
appoint GERALD LUTERMAN, JOHN J. BISHAR, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and each of
them  severally,  as my  attorneys-in-fact  with power to execute in my name and
place, and in my capacity as a director of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any
amendment  to said  Report  and  any  other  documents  required  in  connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney
this 24th day of February, 2005.



                                                     /s/Edward D. Miller
§ 27.49 Performance at minimum operating speed. ( a ) For helicopters— ( 1 ) The hovering ceiling must be determined over the ranges of weight, altitude, and temperature for which certification is requested, with— ( i ) Takeoff power;
( ii ) The landing gear extended; and
( iii ) The helicopter in-ground effect at a height consistent with normal takeoff procedures; and
( 2 ) The hovering ceiling determined under paragraph (a)(1) of this section must be at least— ( i ) For reciprocating engine powered helicopters, 4,000 feet at maximum weight with a standard atmosphere;
( ii ) For turbine engine powered helicopters, 2,500 feet pressure altitude at maximum weight at a temperature of standard plus 22 °C (standard plus 40 °F).
( 3 ) The out-of-ground effect hovering performance must be determined over the ranges of weight, altitude, and temperature for which certification is requested, using takeoff power.
( b ) For rotorcraft other than helicopters, the steady rate of climb at the minimum operating speed must be determined over the ranges of weight, altitude, and temperature for which certification is requested, with— ( 1 ) Takeoff power; and
( 2 ) The landing gear extended.
[Amdt. 27-44, 73 FR 10998, Feb. 29, 2008]
§ 29.1501 General. ( a ) Each operating limitation specified in §§ 29.1503 through 29.1525 and other limitations and information necessary for safe operation must be established.
( b ) The operating limitations and other information necessary for safe operation must be made available to the crewmembers as prescribed in §§ 29.1541 through 29.1589.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Amdt. 29-15, 43 FR 2327, Jan. 16, 1978]