alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-QSB AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                     322,933
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               43,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                12,000
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           720,630
<PP&E>                                     101,657
<DEPRECIATION>                             101,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,640,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      477,672
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    63,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                               1,999,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,640,343
<SALES>                                    498,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           498,661
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              469,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,982
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,383
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,383
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01
        

</TABLE>
#### *Ex parte*Webber’s Executors.

[n an action *oi replevin*against a sheriff, where the jury find *part*of the property in the sheriff, and the *plaintiff*obtains an order for a new trial from the circuit judge, and then before the next circuit, the sheriff dies, *leave will be granted*to the executors of the sheriff to sue out a *scire facias*to revive the suit.

Webber, as sheriff of Westchester, made a levy upon property by virtue of an execution. Underhill sued out a writ of replevin. Webber avowed the taking under the execution. The cause was tried and the jury found *part*of the goods to be the property of the plaintiff, and assessed the value at $454, and the residue of the goods to be the property of the sheriff, and assessed the value at $1046. The plaintiff obtained an order for a new trial from the circuit judge, and then before the next circuit, the sheriff died. The *executors*of the sheriff asked leave to sue out a *scire facias*to revive the suit: which was granted.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 426 

To increase the rates of pay under the General Schedule and other statutory 

pay systems and for prevailing rate employees by 3.6 percent, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself, Mr. BROWN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. WARREN, Mr. 

CARDIN, Mr. KAINE, Ms. HIRONO, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. 

HARRIS, and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To increase the rates of pay under the General Schedule 

and other statutory pay systems and for prevailing rate 

employees by 3.6 percent, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Adjustment 

5 of Income Rates Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘FAIR Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT TO RATES OF PAY. 

7 (a) STATUTORY PAY SYSTEMS.—The adjustment in 

8 rates of basic pay for employees under the statutory pay 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 426 IS

1 systems (as defined in section 5302 of title 5, United 

2 States Code) that takes effect in fiscal year 2020 under 

3 section 5303 of title 5, United States Code, shall be an 

4 increase of 3.6 percent, and such adjustments shall be ef5 fective as of the first day of the first applicable pay period 

6 beginning on or after January 1, 2020. 

7 (b) PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES.—The adjust8 ment in rates of basic pay for the statutory pay systems 

9 that take place in fiscal year 2020 under sections 5344 

10 and 5348 of title 5, United States Code, shall be equal 

11 to the percentage adjustment received by employees in the 

12 same location whose rates of basic pay are adjusted pursu13 ant to the statutory pay systems under subsection (a) of 

14 this section and 5304 of title 5, United States Code. Pre15 vailing rate employees at locations where there are no em16 ployees whose pay is increased pursuant to sections 5303 

17 and 5304 of title 5 and prevailing rate employees de18 scribed in section 5343(a)(5) of title 5, United States 

19 Code, shall be considered to be located in the pay locality 

20 designated as ‘‘Rest of US’’ pursuant to section 5304 of 

21 title 5, United States Code, for purposes of this sub22 section. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.6    CERTIFICATION  REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND   SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18   OF THE UNITED STATES CODE    Gildan Activewear Inc. (the “Corporation”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 to its annual report on Form 40-F for the  fiscal year ended January 2, 2022 (the “Report”) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.    I, Glenn J. Chamandy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my  knowledge:        1 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and        2 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Corporation.  Dated: March 8, 2022    /s/ Glenn J. Chamandy   Name: Glenn J. Chamandy  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
 CERTIFICATION  REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND   SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18   OF THE UNITED STATES CODE    Gildan Activewear Inc. (the “Corporation”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 to its annual report on Form 40-F for the  fiscal year ended January 2, 2022 (the “Report”) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.    I, Rhodri J. Harries, Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of the Corporation,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that, to the best of my knowledge:        1 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and        2 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Corporation.  Dated: March 8, 2022    /s/ Rhodri J. Harries   Name: Rhodri J. Harries  Title: Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial and  Administrative Officer
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Dissolution of Joseph Davis, Inc. Lawrence E. Davis, Appellant; Joseph Davis, Inc., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[698 NYS2d 195]

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Same Memorandum as in *Davis v Davis*([appeal No. 1] 266 AD2d 867 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Michalek, J.— Dismiss Pleading.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Scudder and Callahan, JJ.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3791

To provide that no automatic pay adjustment for Members of Congress 

shall be made in the year following a fiscal year in which there is 

a Federal budget deficit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2004

Mr. STEARNS (for himself, Mr. HALL, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. DEAL

of Georgia, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. PAUL, and Mr. FRANKS of Arizona) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 

Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL

To provide that no automatic pay adjustment for Members 

of Congress shall be made in the year following a fiscal 

year in which there is a Federal budget deficit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deficit Accountability 

5 Act of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 3791 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EFFECT OF A BUDGET DEFICIT. 

2 Section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act 

3 of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) is amended—

4 (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ‘‘Subject to 

5 subparagraph (B),’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to sub6 paragraph (B) and paragraph (3),’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(3) An adjustment under paragraph (2) otherwise 

9 scheduled to take effect in a calendar year shall not be 

10 made if, as determined by the Office of Management and 

11 Budget, there was a deficit (as defined by section 3 of 

12 the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act 

13 of 1974) in the preceding fiscal year.’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robbie J. Toth, Appellant.

[697 NYS2d 791]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a nonjury trial of driving while intoxicated as a felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c]) and other crimes. The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). The testimony of a police officer concerning his observation of defendant, as well as the testimony of defendant’s witnesses that defendant had been drinking that night, is sufficient to establish defendant’s intoxication *(see, People v Donhauser,*255 AD2d 933). In light of defendant’s extensive history of alcohol-related offenses, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, DiTullio, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 9
 EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 9
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 9
 EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 9
#### GLOVER v. THE STATE.

(Decided July 19, 1915.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. Wm. E. Fort.

John W. Altman, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Gateway International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Kasprisin,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  February
      16, 2009
              /s/  Stephen
      KasprisinBy:  Stephen KasprisinIts:  Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Gateway International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Gateway
International Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 4.52

                ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 31,1996

REFERENCE is made to that certain letter agreement dated October 31, 1996, as
amended by Addendum No. 1 thereto (together, the "Agreement") by and between
Monsanto Company ("Monsanto") and The Ricex Company, fka Food Extrusion, Inc.
(the "Company"). In consideration of the covenants set forth below, Monsanto
and the Company agree that, pursuant to Section 8.04 of the Agreement, the
Agreement shall be amended as of October 31, 1999 as follows:

1.  Section 1.02 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following:

"Section 1.02.

(a) Monsanto shall convert the Note into the number of shares of common stock
of the Company determined by dividing $5,000,000 by the lesser of (i) the
average of the closing bid prices for the common stock in the
over-the-counter market during the period of 30 trading days preceding
October 31, 1999 or (ii) $.75; provided, however, if such average of the
closing bid prices is less than $.69, the denominator shall be $.69. The
conversion shall occur on November 30, 1999. Immediately prior to the
conversion, the Company shall deliver to Monsanto an Officer's Certificate
setting forth the total number of shares of common stock of the Company then
outstanding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the number of shares of common
stock of the Company to be purchased by, Monsanto shall not exceed 19.9% of
the shares of the common stock. of the Company outstanding on the conversion
date, after giving effect to such conversion. If Monsanto is not able to
acquire all of the shares of common stock into which the Note would be
convertible under the foregoing formula, the Company shall issue to Monsanto
a promissory note, in the form attached hereto as Annex A, in the principal
amount equal to the value of the shares which Monsanto did not acquire.

(b) Monsanto shall have registration rights with respect to the shares of
Common Stock into which the Note is converted as set forth in the form of
registration rights agreement attached hereto as Exhibit E."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Addendum No. 2 to
the Agreement dated October 31, 1996 as of the 30th day of November, 1999.

Monsanto Company                       The RiceX Company

By: Jacob Licht                        By Daniel L. McPeak
Its: Director, Business Development    Its: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Within our reach : a national strategyto eliminate child abuse and neglect fatalities
 
PDF| EPUB
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.2:C 43/5/ST 8
Item Number:1089-A-11 (online)
CGP System Number:000976086
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 11, 2017********
§ 27.1505 Never-exceed speed. ( a ) The never-exceed speed, V*NE,* must be established so that it is— ( 1 ) Not less than 40 knots (CAS); and
( 2 ) Not more than the lesser of— ( i ) 0.9 times the maximum forward speeds established under § 27.309;
( ii ) 0.9 times the maximum speed shown under §§ 27.251 and 27.629; or
( iii ) 0.9 times the maximum speed substantiated for advancing blade tip mach number effects.
( b ) V*NE* may vary with altitude, r.p.m., temperature, and weight, if— ( 1 ) No more than two of these variables (or no more than two instruments integrating more than one of these variables) are used at one time; and
( 2 ) The ranges of these variables (or of the indications on instruments integrating more than one of these variables) are large enough to allow an operationally practical and safe variation of V*NE*.
( c ) For helicopters, a stabilized power-off V*NE* denoted as V*NE* (power-off) may be established at a speed less than V*NE* established pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) V*NE* (power-off) is not less than a speed midway between the power-on V*NE* and the speed used in meeting the requirements of— ( i ) § 27.65(b) for single engine helicopters; and
( ii ) § 27.67 for multiengine helicopters.
( 2 ) V*NE* (power-off) is— ( i ) A constant airspeed;
( ii ) A constant amount less than power-on V*NE*; or
( iii ) A constant airspeed for a portion of the altitude range for which certification is requested, and a constant amount less than power-on V*NE* for the remainder of the altitude range.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c) of the Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Amdt. 27-2, 33 FR 964, Jan. 26, 1968, and Amdt. 27-14, 43 FR 2325, Jan. 16, 1978; Amdt. 27-21, 49 FR 44435, Nov. 6, 1984]
§ 25.123 En route flight paths. ( a ) For the en route configuration, the flight paths prescribed in paragraph (b) and (c) of this section must be determined at each weight, altitude, and ambient temperature, within the operating limits established for the airplane. The variation of weight along the flight path, accounting for the progressive consumption of fuel and oil by the operating engines, may be included in the computation. The flight paths must be determined at a speed not less than VFTO, with— ( 1 ) The most unfavorable center of gravity;
( 2 ) The critical engines inoperative;
( 3 ) The remaining engines at the available maximum continuous power or thrust; and
( 4 ) The means for controlling the engine-cooling air supply in the position that provides adequate cooling in the hot-day condition.
( b ) The one-engine-inoperative net flight path data must represent the actual climb performance diminished by a gradient of climb of 1.1 percent for two-engine airplanes, 1.4 percent for three-engine airplanes, and 1.6 percent for four-engine airplanes— ( 1 ) In non-icing conditions; and
( 2 ) In icing conditions with the most critical of the en route ice accretion(s) defined in Appendices C and O of this part, as applicable, in accordance with § 25.21(g), if: ( i ) A speed of 1.18 “VSR0 with the en route ice accretion exceeds the en route speed selected for non-icing conditions by more than the greater of 3 knots CAS or 3 percent of VSR; or
( ii ) The degradation of the gradient of climb is greater than one-half of the applicable actual-to-net flight path reduction defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
( c ) For three- or four-engine airplanes, the two-engine-inoperative net flight path data must represent the actual climb performance diminished by a gradient of climb of 0.3 percent for three-engine airplanes and 0.5 percent for four-engine airplanes.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-121, 72 FR 44666; Aug. 8, 2007; Amdt. 25-140, 79 FR 65525, Nov. 4, 2014]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24892-1 Filed:08/15/23 Entered:08/15/23 17:37:32 Desc:

Informative Motion Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24892-1 Filed:08/15/23 Entered:08/15/23 17:37:32 Desc:

Informative Motion Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24892-1 Filed:08/15/23 Entered:08/15/23 17:37:32 Desc:

Informative Motion Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24892-1 Filed:08/15/23 Entered:08/15/23 17:37:32 Desc:

Informative Motion Page 4 of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3536 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3536

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 210 Main Street in Malden, Illinois, as the ``Army Staff Sgt. 
                Lincoln Hollinsaid Malden Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 210 
Main Street in Malden, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 
``Army Staff Sgt. Lincoln Hollinsaid Malden Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Army Staff Sgt. Lincoln 
Hollinsaid Malden Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 9, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 25.609 Protection of structure. Each part of the structure must— ( a ) Be suitably protected against deterioration or loss of strength in service due to any cause, including— ( 1 ) Weathering;
( 2 ) Corrosion; and
( 3 ) Abrasion; and
( b ) Have provisions for ventilation and drainage where necessary for protection.
#### TARVER v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 18, 1916.)

Appeal from Montgomery -City Court.

Heard before Hon. C. P. McIntyre.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

Appeal dismissed on motion of Attorney General.
#### MINDEN v. THE STATE.

(Decided November 18, 1915.)

Appeal from Mobile City Court.

Heard before Hon. O. J. SEMMES.

G. H. Kruempel, for appellant. *W-*L. Martin, Attorney General, and J. P. Mudd, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

No bill of exceptions and no error of record. Affirmed.