alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40623 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v.
SANTOS SAMUEL HERNANDEZ -CALIX,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15 -CR- 1028 -1

Before JOLLY, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santos Samuel Hernandez-Calix has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez- Cali x ha s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fif h Circuit 

### FILED March 21, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40623 Document: 00513920190 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2017No. 16

- 40623

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
mot ion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED as frivolous, see 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2

. Case: 16-40623 Document: 00513920190 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2017
§ 111.225 Training, qualification, and proficiency records. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each reporting entity must provide to the PRD the following records for each individual whom the reporting entity has employed as a pilot: ( 1 ) Records establishing an individual's compliance with FAA-required training, qualifications, and proficiency events, which the reporting entity maintains pursuant to § 91.1027(a)(3), § 121.683, § 125.401 or § 135.63(a)(4) of this chapter, as applicable, including comments and evaluations made by a check pilot or evaluator; and
( 2 ) Other records the reporting entity maintains documenting an individual's compliance with FAA or employer-required training, checking, testing, proficiency, or other events related to pilot performance concerning the training, qualifications, proficiency, and professional competence of the individual, including any comments and evaluations made by a check pilot or evaluator.
( b ) No person may report any of the following information for inclusion in the PRD: ( 1 ) Records related to flight time, duty time, and rest time.
( 2 ) Records demonstrating compliance with physical examination requirements or any other protected medical records.
( 3 ) Records documenting recent flight experience.
( 4 ) Records identified in § 111.245.
( c ) Each record reported to the PRD in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section must include: ( 1 ) Date of the event;
( 2 ) Aircraft type, if applicable;
( 3 ) Duty position of the pilot, if applicable;
( 4 ) Training program approval part and subpart of this chapter, as applicable;
( 5 ) Crewmember training and qualification curriculum and category of training as reflected in either a FAA-approved or employer-mandated training program;
( 6 ) Result of the event (satisfactory or unsatisfactory);
( 7 ) Comments of check pilot or evaluator, if applicable under part 91, 121, 125, or 135 of this chapter. For unsatisfactory events, the tasks or maneuvers considered unsatisfactory must be included.
( d ) An operator, entity, or trustee that complies with § 111.215(b) must report records in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section upon request, if that operator or entity possesses those records.
( e ) ( 1 ) Each reporting entity must provide a record within 30 days of creating that record, in accordance with § 111.215(a), unless the reporting entity is an operator, entity, or trustee complying with § 111.215(b).
( 2 ) An operator, entity, or trustee complying with § 111.215(b) must provide records described in this section or a statement that it does not have any records described in this section within 14 days of receiving a request from a reviewing entity.
§ 31.12 Proof of compliance. ( a ) Each requirement of this subpart must be met at each weight within the range of loading conditions for which certification is requested. This must be shown by— ( 1 ) Tests upon a balloon of the type for which certification is requested or by calculations based on, and equal in accuracy to, the results of testing; and
( 2 ) Systematic investigation of each weight if compliance cannot be reasonably inferred from the weights investigated.
( b ) Except as provided in § 31.17(b), allowable weight tolerances during flight testing are + 5 percent and −10 percent.
[Amdt. 31-4, 45 FR 60179, Sept. 11, 1980]
EXHIBIT
32.1
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **RULE
13a-14(1) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of House of Brussels Chocolate Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant
Petersen, Chief Executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
    The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      company.
 
 
 Date:
    December 15, 2004By:
    /s/
      Grant PetersenGrant
      PetersenChief
      Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Chet Mestler, Respondent, against American Sales Book Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

(Argued September 30, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*545
      *Horace C. Winch*for appellant.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Leon Freedman*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
Exhibit
                32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B. Grant Yarber,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ *B. Grant Yarber*


B.
      Grant Yarber


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


May
      10, 2007




This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not
      be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
      Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 443 

To modify the definition of an antique firearm. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2019 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To modify the definition of an antique firearm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES 

4 CODE. 

5 Section 921(a)(16)(A) of title 18, United States 

6 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘1898’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

7 calendar year that is 100 years before the calendar year 

8 in which the determination as to whether the firearm 

9 meets the requirement of this subparagraph is being 

10 made’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 443 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 

2 1986. 

3 Subsection (g) of section 5845 of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(g) ANTIQUE FIREARM.— 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘antique firearm’ 

7 means— 

8 ‘‘(A) any firearm manufactured in or be9 fore the applicable year (including any 

10 matchlock, flintlock, percussion cap, or similar 

11 type of ignition system or replica thereof, 

12 whether actually manufactured before or after 

13 the applicable year), and 

14 ‘‘(B) any firearm using fixed ammunition 

15 manufactured in or before the applicable year, 

16 for which ammunition is no longer manufac17 tured in the United States and is not readily 

18 available in the ordinary channels of commercial 

19 trade. 

20 ‘‘(2) APPLICABLE YEAR.—For purposes of 

21 paragraph (1), the term ‘applicable year’ means the 

22 calendar year that is 100 years before the calendar 

23 year in which the determination as to whether the 

24 firearm meets the requirements of such paragraph is 

25 being made.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 13.207 Certification of documents. ( a ) *Signature required.* The attorney of record, the party, or the party's representative must sign, by hand, electronically, or by other method acceptable to the administrative law judge, or, if the matter is on appeal, to the FAA decisionmaker, each document tendered for filing with the FAA Hearing Docket or served on the administrative law judge and on each other party.
( b ) *Effect of signing a document.* By signing a document, the attorney of record, the party, or the party's representative certifies that the attorney, the party, or the party's representative has read the document and, based on reasonable inquiry and to the best of that person's knowledge, information, and belief, the document is— ( 1 ) Consistent with the rules in this subpart;
( 2 ) Warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; and
( 3 ) Not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, not made to harass any person, not made to cause unnecessary delay, and not made to cause needless increase in the cost of the proceedings or for any other improper purpose.
( c ) *Sanctions.* If the attorney of record, the party, or the party's representative signs a document in violation of this section, the administrative law judge or the FAA decisionmaker must: ( 1 ) Strike the pleading signed in violation of this section;
( 2 ) Strike the request for discovery or the discovery response signed in violation of this section and preclude further discovery by the party;
( 3 ) Deny the motion or request signed in violation of this section;
( 4 ) Exclude the document signed in violation of this section from the record;
( 5 ) Dismiss the interlocutory appeal and preclude further appeal on that issue by the party who filed the appeal until an initial decision has been entered on the record; or
( 6 ) Dismiss the appeal of the administrative law judge's initial decision to the FAA decisionmaker.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 434 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 434

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To require the collection of certain data relating to Bureau of Land 
         Management land acquisitions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND ACQUISITION DATA.

    The Secretary of the Interior (acting through the Director of the 
Bureau of Land Management) shall--
            (1) collect centralized data on land acquired for 
        administration by the Bureau of Land Management using amounts 
        from the Land and Water Conservation Fund established under 
        section 200302 of title 54, United States Code, including data 
        on--
                    (A) the method used for the acquisition; and
                    (B) the type of interest acquired;
            (2) not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
        this Act, and annually thereafter, submit to Congress a report 
        describing the information collected under paragraph (1); and
            (3) develop guidance to ensure that land acquisition data 
        collected under paragraph (1) is entered correctly and properly 
        coded in the data system of the Bureau of Land Management.

            Passed the Senate December 2, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 434

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To require the collection of certain data relating to Bureau of Land 
         Management land acquisitions, and for other purposes.
```
Filed 10/3/19 by Clerk of Supr eme Court



### I N T H E S U P RE M E C O U R T S T A T E O F N O R T H D A KO T A

2019 ND 241

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Komikka Katrice Gregory, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20190060

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee , Judge.

AFFIRMED

.

Per Curiam.

Kelly A. Dillon, Special Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND

, fo r plaintiff and appellee

.

Rozanna C. Larson (on bri ef), State’s Attorney, Minot, ND

, for plaintiff and appellee.

Russell J. Myhre, Enderlin, ND

, for defendant and appellant.1 State v. Gregory No. 20190060

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Komikka Gregory appeals from an amended criminal judgment
entered after a jury verdict. Following trial, in October 2018 a jury found Gregory not guilty of the charge of murder, but guil ty of a charge of manslaughter. Gregory argues there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury verdict for her conviction. Viewin g the evidence in the light most
favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of conviction. We
affir m under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24493 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:01:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24493 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:01:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24493 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:01:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24493 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:01:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24493 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:01:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 5
#### In the Matter of Lawrence Peterson, Appellant, against L. Barron Hill, as District Attorney of Suffolk County, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Joshua D. Budd, Appellant, against L. Barron Hill, as District Attorney of Suffolk County, et al., Respondents.

(Argued October 2, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*559
      *Michael A. Petroccia*and *George A. Gibson*for appellants.

*Guy O. Walser, L. Barron Hill, District Attorney*(in person), and *Howard J. Grace*for respondents.

Orders affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien. Hhbbs, Croech, Loeghran and Finch, JJ.
§ 29.1461 Equipment containing high energy rotors. ( a ) Equipment containing high energy rotors must meet paragraph (b), (c), or (d) of this section.
( b ) High energy rotors contained in equipment must be able to withstand damage caused by malfunctions, vibration, abnormal speeds, and abnormal temperatures. In addition— ( 1 ) Auxiliary rotor cases must be able to contain damage caused by the failure of high energy rotor blades; and
( 2 ) Equipment control devices, systems, and instrumentation must reasonably ensure that no operating limitations affecting the integrity of high energy rotors will be exceeded in service.
( c ) It must be shown by test that equipment containing high energy rotors can contain any failure of a high energy rotor that occurs at the highest speed obtainable with the normal speed control devices inoperative.
( d ) Equipment containing high energy rotors must be located where rotor failure will neither endanger the occupants nor adversely affect continued safe flight.
[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 971, Jan. 26, 1968]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated January 28, 2000, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 9, 2000, (65 FR 27), Mallinckrodt, Inc., Mallinckrodt & Second Streets, St. Louis, Missouri 63147, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of dihydromorphine (9145), a basic class of controlled substance listed Schedule I.                

Mallinckrodt, Inc. plans to isolate dihydromorphine as a step in a multistep synthesis of hydromorphone.

DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Mallinckrodt, Inc. to manufacture dihydromorphine is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Mallinckrodt, Inc. on a regular basis to ensure that the company's continued registration is consistent with the public interest. These investigations have included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed above is granted.

Dated: April 25, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-11411 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting


AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission

TIME AND DATE: May 9, 2000 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Agenda for future meeting: none
    2. Minutes
    3. Ratification List
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-318 and 731-TA-538 and 561 (Review)(Sulfanilic 
Acid from China and India)--briefing and vote. (The Commission will 
transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on May 18, 
2000.)
    5. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-286 and 731-TA-365 (Review)(Industrial 
Phosphoric Acid from Belgium and Israel)--briefing and vote. (The 
Commission will transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce 
on May 22, 2000.)
    6. Outstanding action jackets:
    (1.) Document No. GC-00-020: Administrative matters.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 1, 2000.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11332 Filed 5-2-00; 3:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 88 (Friday, May 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11425]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Washington, DC 20207.

TIME AND DATE: Friday, May 12, 2000, 10 a.m.

LOCATION: Room 420, East West Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Open to the Public.

Matter to be Considered:  

Mid-Year Review

    The staff will brief the Commission on issues related to fiscal 
year 2000 mid-year review.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: May 3, 2000.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11425 Filed 5-3-00; 2:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M