alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 323.14 Temporary suspension authority for involuntary interruption of service. ( a ) Any air carrier may temporarily suspend service without filing a notice under § 323.3 for any interruption of service that the carrier cannot reasonably be expected to foresee or control, such as rules, standards, or other action, or inaction, of the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration or of a foreign government, emergency measures, strikes, weather conditions, construction work on airports, or disasters. However, the provisions of this paragraph shall apply to interruptions due to airport inadequacies only if the carrier is unable to serve the place through any airport convenient to the place with the type of equipment last regularly used to serve the place.
( b ) In the case of an interruption of service caused by a strike, the carrier shall give immediate notice of the interruption to DOT. Suspension authority under this section due to a strike shall expire 90 days after employees return to work.
( c ) If service to a place is interrupted for more than 3 consecutive days for reasons beyond the carrier's control other than a strike, the holder shall give notice to DOT within 3 days following the date of first interruption, setting forth the date of first interruption and a full statement of the reasons for the interruption.
( d ) The notice required by paragraph (b) or (c) of this section shall be marked for the attention of the Director, Office of Aviation Analysis.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3024-0030) [Doc. No. 82, 50 FR 2430, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended by Doc. No. OST-96-1269, 61 FR 19166, May 1, 1996]
#### Maxwell E. Lopin, as Receiver of Anton Miller, Appellant, *v.*Hewes Holding Corporation, Defendant, and Hermine Frank, Respondent.

(Submitted June 1, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*465
      *Joseph Lotterman*and *Milton M. Father*for appellant.

*Henry M. Flotean*and *Gustav Nadel*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
§ 25.1310 Power source capacity and distribution. ( a ) Each installation whose functioning is required for type certification or under operating rules and that requires a power supply is an “essential load” on the power supply. The power sources and the system must be able to supply the following power loads in probable operating combinations and for probable durations: ( 1 ) Loads connected to the system with the system functioning normally.
( 2 ) Essential loads, after failure of any one prime mover, power converter, or energy storage device.
( 3 ) Essential loads after failure of— ( i ) Any one engine on two-engine airplanes; and
( ii ) Any two engines on airplanes with three or more engines.
( 4 ) Essential loads for which an alternate source of power is required, after any failure or malfunction in any one power supply system, distribution system, or other utilization system.
( b ) In determining compliance with paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section, the power loads may be assumed to be reduced under a monitoring procedure consistent with safety in the kinds of operation authorized. Loads not required in controlled flight need not be considered for the two-engine-inoperative condition on airplanes with three or more engines.
[Amdt. 25-123, 72 FR 63405, Nov. 8, 2007]
§ 27.1365 Electric cables. ( a ) Each electric connecting cable must be of adequate capacity.
( b ) Each cable that would overheat in the event of circuit overload or fault must be at least flame resistant and may not emit dangerous quantities of toxic fumes.
( c ) Insulation on electrical wire and cable installed in the rotorcraft must be self-extinguishing when tested in accordance with appendix F, part I(a)(3), of part 25 of this chapter.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-35, 63 FR 43285, Aug. 12, 1998]
#### PACK v. THE STATE.

(Decided February 1, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

.Heard before Hon. Wm. E. Fort.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Thomas, J.

No bill of exceptions, no error of record. Affirmed.
181029 SCH ORD RE DANUZ LIFT STAY VERSION OCTOBER 29, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF MOTION REQUESTING LIFT OF STAY

The Court has received and reviewed the Motion Requesting Lift of Stay (the 

“Motion”) filed by Michael E. Danuz Reyes (the “Movant”). (Docket Entry No. 4111.) 

Opposition papers to the Motion must be filed by November 12, 2018. Movant’s reply papers 

must be filed by November 19, 2018. The Court will thereafter take the Motion on submission, 

unless a party thereto requests a hearing.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 29, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation 

(“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 

17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System 

of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power 

Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4113 Filed:10/29/18 Entered:10/29/18 12:06:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
§ 27.427 Unsymmetrical loads. ( a ) Horizontal tail surfaces and their supporting structure must be designed for unsymmetrical loads arising from yawing and rotor wake effects in combination with the prescribed flight conditions.
( b ) To meet the design criteria of paragraph (a) of this section, in the absence of more rational data, both of the following must be met: ( 1 ) One hundred percent of the maximum loading from the symmetrical flight conditions acts on the surface on one side of the plane of symmetry, and no loading acts on the other side.
( 2 ) Fifty percent of the maximum loading from the symmetrical flight conditions acts on the surface on each side of the plane of symmetry but in opposite directions.
( c ) For empennage arrangements where the horizontal tail surfaces are supported by the vertical tail surfaces, the vertical tail surfaces and supporting structure must be designed for the combined vertical and horizontal surface loads resulting from each prescribed flight condition, considered separately. The flight conditions must be selected so the maximum design loads are obtained on each surface. In the absence of more rational data, the unsymmetrical horizontal tail surface loading distributions described in this section must be assumed.
[Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 7999, Mar. 6, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 27-27, 55 FR 38966, Sept. 21, 1990]
###### Editorial Note on Part 206

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 206 appear at 84 FR 15925, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 206.1 Emergency transportation.

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 41101 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, and any term, condition or limitation attached to the exercise of the privileges of an air carrier certificate of public convenience and necessity which prohibits an air carrier from engaging in air transportation between any points on its route, the air carrier may carry between such points (a) any person or persons certified by a physician to be in need of immediate air transportation in order to secure emergency medical or surgical treatment together with any necessary attendant or attendants and (b) any medical supplies certified by a physician as requiring immediate air transportation for the protection of life. Air carriers offering to provide this emergency transportation shall file appropriate tariffs pursuant to Chapter 415 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII.

(Secs. 204, 416, 72 Stat. 743, 771; 49 U.S.C. 1324, 1386)

[ER-261, 24 FR 1860, Mar. 14, 1959, as amended at 60 FR 43524, Aug. 22, 1995]
#### Philip J. Scaduto, Respondent, v DT Industries, Inc., Appellant.

[699 NYS2d 36]

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered January 14, 1999, which, in a plenary action, confirmed an arbitration award and entered judgment thereon, is hereby *150deemed to arise in a special proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75, and as such, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The proper procedure to enforce an arbitration award arising out of a written agreement to arbitrate is a special proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 *(Polednak v Country-Wide Ins. Co.,*153 AD2d 930, *lv denied*75 NY2d 705). Consequently, the instant action is converted to a proceeding *(see,*CPLR 103 [b]).

Respondent was hired as a salesman of ladies’ clothing for appellant under an agreement which provided for six months of base pay in the event respondent was terminated “for cause” in the first year. Within such year appellant terminated respondent, citing, *inter alia,*alleged misrepresentations during the interview process as to his experience and contacts in the business. Appellant’s contention that respondent fraudulently induced it to hire him was asserted before the arbitrator, who awarded respondent the six months of base pay as contemplated by the agreement.

Appellant contends that the award violates the public policy of this State by rewarding respondent for his own fraud in obtaining employment. However, there is nothing on the face of this award to indicate that it violated any public policy *(see, Matter of Hirsch Constr. Corp. [Anderson],*180 AD2d 604). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Mazzarelli, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN NO. 03-01-00137-CV Tex as Depar

tment of Publi c Safety, Appell

ant v. Susan Erard-Coupe, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT C OURT OF TRAVIS COUNT Y, 390TH JUDICIAL DIST RICT NO. 00-3459, HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK , JUDGE PRESIDING PER CURIAM

Appe llantT ex as De pa r t men t o f Pu blic S afe t y has filed a mo t io n t o dis miss t he ap pe al, to whi ch appel le e Susan Erard-Coupe has n o obj ec ti on. W e g

ran t the moti on an d d ismis s t he ap pe al. Tex . R. A pp. P. 42 .1(a)(2 ). Bef ore Justices K

idd, B. A . Smi

th and Pury

ear Di sm i ss ed on A ppe l l an t’s Moti on File d: April 26, 2001 Do No t Publis

h
steam

_ record - Re: Effluent Guidelines Questi onnaire Completion Extension Request for Dairyland Power Cooperative

Gree tings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: Bill J Kowalski <wjk@ dair y net.com> Date: 7/9/2010 12:39 PM Sub j ect: Re: Effluent Guidelines Questionnaire Completion Extension Request for Dairyland Power Cooperative Attachments: Extension Request

_ Effluent Guidelines Questionnaire - Letter to EPA 07082010.pdf Pa g e 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, 

As representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.

Debtors1.

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17-CV-01578-LTS

Case No. 17-03283

(Joint Administration Requested)

EX PARTE ORDER 

THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the United States Trustee’s Ex 

Parte Motion to Temporarily Modify the Requirements of Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2002(i), for the 

Retiree Committee, cause having been established and no prejudice to parties in interest being 

apparent, 

NOW THEREFORE,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the notices required to be transmitted to the Retiree 

Committee in case no. 17-BK-03283 (the Commonwealth’s Title III Case) pursuant to Fed. R. 

Bankr. P. 2002(i) shall be provided by the United States Trustee until entry of appearance by an 

attorney for the Retiree Committee. 

Dated:

 _________________________

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective bankruptcy case number and the last four 

(4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); and (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 9686). Case Nos. 17 BK 3283-LTS and 17 BK 3284-LTS are jointly administered by order of the court.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:341-1 Filed:06/15/17 Entered:06/15/17 08:01:31 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 1 of 1
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

September 22, 2015

Hon. Jerad Najvar

Attorney at Law

4151 Southwest Freeway, Ste. 625

Houston, TX 77027

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Gilberto Hinojosa

Attorney at Law

622 E. St. Charles St.

Brownsville, TX 78520

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00581-CV

Tr.Ct.No. C-6914-13-G

Style: Lupe Rivera v. Leticia "Letty" Lopez

State’s motion to obtain a copy of the record in the above cause was this day 

GRANTED by this Court. A CD copy of the record is being sent as of this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
#### William C. Osborn, Appellant, *v.*John J. McElligott, as Fire Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

(Argued October 2, 1936;

decided October 13, 1936.)

*517
      *H. H. Nordlinger, Harold Riegelman*and *J. M. Dinnes*for appellant.

*Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (William C. Chanler*of counsel), for John J. McElligott, as Fire Commissioner of the City of New York, et ah, respondents.

*Alfred J. Talley, Charles Lamb*and *James A. Mc Kaigney*for Vincent J. Kane, individually and as president of Uniformed Firemen’s Association, etc., respondent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
To: US Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington DC 20591 

From: Mr. Thaddeus Porebski Jr. 

UAS Project Manager 

LGP Realty Of West Milford, LLC. 

14 Split Rock Road 

West Milford, New Jersey 07480 

Dear Brittany Newton, July 8,2015 

Please accept this letter as response to your letter dated July 6, 2015 for requesting further 

information with the requirements of § 11.81, in answering reasons why granting the 

request would be in the public interest. 

It is the request of the petitioner for exemptions listed above in order to legally and safely 

operate the DJI, PHANTOM 3 UAS, in the National Airspace System, for the purpose of 

Unmanned Aerial Photography and Videography for the real estate and construction for 

commercial gain and enhancement of Public awareness of UAS operation, and finally enhanced 

safety for the General Public. 

To benefit the public as a whole, the information gathered by use of the DJI Phantom 3 

in general awareness and education pertaining to the specific land/structure surveyed. 

In support of this exemption I reference the following: 

Exemption No. 11945 FAA-2015-1457 Home Debut Inc. 

Exemption No. 11940 FAA-2015-1397 Aerial Associates Photography Inc. 

Exemption No. 11915 FAA-2015-1340 William K. Pedersen 

All of which are in the parameters as my petition for exemption and have been granted. 

I seek the same without prejudice. 
If any other infonnation or changes are needed with my appliication, 

Please contact me at: 

Mailing address: 

Mr. Tliaddeus Porebski Jr. 

UAS Project Manager 

LGP Realty of West Milford LLC 

14 Split Rock Road 

West Milford New Jersey 07480 

Email: lgprealtv@optonline.net 

Or Telephone: 973-417-3464 

I thank you for your time and consideration.
§ 375.45 Records and reports of occasional planeload charters. ( a ) *Cargo documents.* The holder of a permit for cargo operations shall issue a manifest or shipping document to its shipper with respect to each shipment.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Contents of documents for passenger flights.* The holder of a permit for passenger charters originating or terminating in the United States shall require each charterer to file with it prior to flight a list of names and addresses of all passengers to be transported on each flight.
( d ) *Reports of unused authority.* All foreign operators of occasional planeload charters for which authority is granted must notify the Department, in writing, not later than 15 days after the expiration of their permits, or their failure to use this authority. The unused authority shall otherwise be deemed to have been exercised.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

---------------------------------------------------------------

In re

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

 as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, 

et al.,

Debtors.

x

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

PROMESA 

Title III

Case No. 17-BK-3283 (LTS)

(Jointly Administered)

---------------------------------------------------------------

In re

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

 as representative of

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER 

AUTHORITY (PREPA)

Debtor.

---------------------------------------------------------------

x

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

x

PROMESA 

Title III

Case No. 17-BK-04780 (LTS)

Court Filing Relates Only to PREPA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

I hereby certify that Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, as administrative agent for certain 

lenders (hereafter “Scotiabank”), in accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9014(b), Fed. R. Bankr. P. 

7004(b), and the Court’s Third Amended Notice, Case Management and Administrative 

Procedures Order (Docket No. 1512 of Case No. 17-03283 (LTS)) (the “CMP Order”), sent a 

true and exact copy of the document titled Limited Reply of Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, as 

Administrative Agent, and Solus Alternative Asset Management LP in Support of Urgent Motion for 

Revised $300 Million Loan to PREPA, filed on February 18, 2018 (Docket No. 739 of Case No. 17-

04780 (LTS)), by electronic mail upon all the parties listed in the Master Service List on 

FEBRUARY 18th, 2018, and by U.S. mail upon all the Standard Parties listed in the CMP 

Order, on FEBRUARY 20th, 2018,.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2552 Filed:02/20/18 Entered:02/20/18 13:02:38 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 20

th day of February, 2018.

WE HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date, we electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing 

to all CM/ECF participants in this case. 

MCCONNELL VALDÉS LLC

Attorneys for Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, as 

Administrative Agent

270 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 7

Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918

PO Box 364225

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-4225

Telephone: 787-250-5604

Facsimile: 787-759-9225

By: s/Antonio A. Arias

Antonio A. Arias

USDC-PR No. 204906

aaa@mcvpr.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2552 Filed:02/20/18 Entered:02/20/18 13:02:38 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 380

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 380.36 Record retention.

Every charter operator conducting a charter pursuant to this part shall comply with the applicable record-retention provisions of part 249 of this chapter.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of John M. Glen, Deceased. Eleanor Glen, Individually and as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of the Estate of John M. Glen, Deceased, et al., Appellants; James Glen, Respondent.

(Argued September 29, 1936;

decided October 13, 1936.)

*531
      *Robert McC. Marsh*and *Frederic P. Rich*for appellants.

*Alexander J. Field*for respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion. (See 272 N. Y. 640.)

Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J., Loughran and Finch, JJ.