alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9th Conference on Air Qual

Modeling – A&WMA AB3 

Comments on CALPUFF 

Presented by

Gale F. Hoffnagle, CCM,QEP

TRC Environmental Corporation

21 Griffin Road North

Windsor, CT 06095

ghoffnagle@trcsolutions.com
Comment Areas

• CALPUFF fulfills an important modeling n• EPA Concerns about CALPUFF• EPA control of model development and c• Use at less than 50 kilometers• Use at greater than 200/300 kilometers
CALPUFF Fulfills an Import

Modeling Need

• Many applications require air quality impa

from individual stacks for long distances

• Need a 3-D Lagrangian model – Eulerian 

will not work well for individual sources. Csubgrid scale modules in Eulerian models too simplistic.

• CALPUFF is a model with substantial use

community experience

• Better handling of low wind speed cases, 

stagnation, coastal, complex terrain and freversals.

• Better handling of deposition 
EPA Concerns about CALPU

• EPA concerned that near field evaluation

CALPUFF has been somewhat limited, ein near field (8 new studies)

• Some aspects of the approved model are 

about 25 years old

– Substantial EPA resources may be nee

evaluate and approve upgrades as oppEPA working on consideration of newealternative models

– Chemistry fine for NOx,SO2 and PM.
EPA Doesn’t Have Direct Con

the CALPUFF Code – Advant

• EPA has control of the “regulatory” code• Developer has multiple funding sources a

resources to provide for advances in this 

• Developer provides training courses for 

CALPUFF 

• Developer provides continuous support fo

model maintenance, expanded GUI’s, etcEPA would not be able to do.

• AWMA supports an independent Workgro
EPA Doesn’t Have Direct Contr

CALPUFF Code – Disadvant

• EPA has not been able to supply any fun

provide modeling updates that EPA want

• As a result, EPA says...

– CALPUFF user guide lags far behind updated 

releases - last user guide (v.5.8) released in 

– Some of the latest guidance is only available 

attend a course given by TRC (v 6 users guidawaiting EPA approval of code)

– Code changes made without EPA oversight a

funding require extensive EPA review.

– Coordination between EPA and TRC needs t

improved
CALPUFF at Less Than 5

Kilometers

• Why 50 kilometers? Should be base

transport time.

• Requiring “equivalency” is too restric• Better method is to define more prec

when “complex winds” require puff modeling as suggested previously

• Adding bells and whistles to AERMO

not make it Lagrangian
CALPUFF at greater than 200

Kilometers

• CALPUFF comparisons to long rang

transport studies have shown relativaccuracy to 200 kilometers

• FLAG says to use out to 300 kilome• Many States, RPOs and Regions ar

using out to 600 kilometers and mor

• Either there should be a defined out

or more LRT field studies should be conducted
AWMA Specialty Conferen

• “Guideline on Air Quality Models: Ne

Generation Models”

• RTP October 26-30, 2009• Call for Papers out soon. Look for it 

www.AWMA.org
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,973
<INVENTORY>                                     10,127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,588
<PP&E>                                          42,559
<DEPRECIATION>                                (22,721)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,119
<BONDS>                                        106,821
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           13,635
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,212
<SALES>                                        412,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               412,276
<CGS>                                          337,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  337,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,624
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,310
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,446
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    344
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,102
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10947]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Connecticut Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Connecticut Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
1:00 p.m. and recess at 10:00 p.m. on Wednesday, May 24, 2000; 
reconvene at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 5:10 p.m. on Thursday, May 25, 
2000, at the Bridgeport Holiday Inn, 1070 Main Street, Bridgeport, 
Connecticut 06604. The Committee will hold a community forum on issues 
dealing with police-community relations and treatment of minority 
students in public schools in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Invited 
panelists include local and Federal officials, civil rights advocates, 
community leaders and citizens.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Neil Macy, 860-
242-7287, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 
202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will 
attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, April 27, 2000.
Lisa M. Kelly,
Special Assistant to the Staff Director, Regional Programs Coordination 
Unit.
[FR Doc. 00-10947 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```

                                                                                                                           ------------

                            *Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

        In connection with the Annual Report of Meier Worldwide Intermedia, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10K-SB for the period ended October 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James Meier, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                          By   /s/  James Meier

                                          James Meier
                                          Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

*February 5, 2004*
```
Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements  No.
333-73356 and No. 333-40548 of OptiMark Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report
dated May 31, 2002 (which report  expresses an unqualified  opinion and includes
explanatory paragraphs relating to OptiMark Holdings, Inc.'s ability to continue
as a going concern),  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of OptiMark
Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.



/s/  Deloite & Touche LLP

New York, NY

July 18, 2002
IC 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 395 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2019 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, 

to include a link to a 100 word plain language summary 

of the proposed rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

S 395 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Account3 ability Through Transparency Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100 WORD SUMMARY TO 

5 REGULATIONS.GOV. 

6 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

9 end; 

10 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

11 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(4) the Internet address of a summary of not 

15 more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, 

16 in plain language, that shall be posted on the Inter17 net website under section 206(d) of the E-Govern18 ment Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) (commonly 

19 known as regulations.gov).’’. 

Passed the Senate June 11, 2019. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

                        CERTIFICATION

     I, Sam DiGiralomo, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q  of
Allstates WorldCargo,  Inc.;

2.    Based  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any  untrue
statement  of  a  material  fact or omit  to  state  a  material  fact
necessary  to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect  to
the period covered by this report;

3.    Based  on  my  knowledge, the financial  statements,  and  other
financial information included in this report, fairly present  in  all
material  respects the financial condition, results of operations  and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented  in
this report;

4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and   I   are
responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls  and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
       disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
       supervision,  to  ensure  that  material information relating to
       the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
       made  known to us by others within those  entities, particularly
       during  the  period  in  which  this  report  is  being prepared;

  (b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's disclosure
       controls and procedures and presented in this report our
       conclusions  about the effectiveness of the  disclosure controls
       and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by this
       report based on such evaluation; and

  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
       control  over financial reporting that occurred  during the
       registrant's   most   recent  fiscal  quarter  (the registrant's
       fourth  fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
       has  materially  affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
       affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I   have
disclosed,  based  on our most recent evaluation of  internal  control
over  financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the  audit
committee   of  the  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or   persons
performing the equivalent functions):

  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
      or   operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting
      which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
      registrant's ability to record, process, summarize  and report
      financial information; and

  (b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not material,  that  involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



February 14, 2008

/s/ Sam DiGiralomo
President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 84 (Monday, May 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10718]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL00-70-000]


New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, Complainant v. New 
York Independent System Operator, Inc., Respondent; Notice of Complaint

April 25, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 24, 2000, New York State Electric & Gas 
Corporation (NYSEG) submitted a Complaint pursuant to Section 206 of 
the Federal Power Act against the New York Independent System Operator 
(NYISO) and a request for an emergency technical conference. The 
Complaint seeks to suspend market-based rates and to require suppliers 
within the New York Control Area (NYCA) to use cost-based bids for 
energy markets in the NYCA, or alternative proposed remedies, in 
advance of the summer peak season.
    Copies of the filing were served upon the NYISO and other 
interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before May 5, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Answers to the 
complaint shall also be due on or before May 5, 2000.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10718 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### ROSENBAUM *v.*TYSZKA.

Vendor and Purchaser — Contracts—Frauds, Statute of — Terms —Sufficiency of Memorandum.

A land contract in *the*form of a receipt for $25 “as a deposit on house located at 1415 Chene street, purchase price $3,450. One thousand will be paid before June 15, 1915. Balance $300 and interest,” signed by the vendor, did not contain a sufficient memorandum of the terms to satisfy the statute of frauds, since the time of performance must be clearly stated.1

Appeal from Wayne; Mandell, J.

Submitted June 15, 1916.

(Docket No. 137.)

Decided July 21, 1916.

Bill by Sam Rosenbaum and another against Kornelia Tyszka for the specific performance of an alleged land contract. From a decree overruling a demurrer, defendant appeals.

Reversed, and decree entered for defendant.

*Walter*Phillips, for defendant.

1

As to necessity of specifying time of payment of purchase price in contract or memorandum for the sale of real property, see note in 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 84.

Moore, J.

Plaintiffs filed their bill of complaint against defendant for specific performance of a land contract, based upon the following writing:

> “Detroit, Mich., May 29, 1915.

> “Received of Sam and Bela Rosenbaum twenty-five and no/100 dollars, as deposit on house located at 1415 Chene street, purchase price $3,450. One thousand-will be paid before June 15, 1915. Balance $300 and interest.

> “[Signed] Kornelia Tyszka.”

Defendant filed a demurrer to the bill of complaint for the following reason:

> *458“Because the alleged contract to sell, set up in complainants’ bill of complaint, is not sufficient under the statutes of the State of Michigan to bind the defendant to make the sale.”

The demurrer was brought on for hearing. It was regarded by the court as a motion to dismiss and was denied. The defendant petitioned this court for leave to appeal. The petition was examined by one of the Justices, who declined to hold that the petition for said appeal does not present a meritorious question, and the appeal was allowed.

No brief has been filed in this court by the appellee. The case is unlike the recent case of *Brin*v. *Michalski,*188 Mich. 400 (154 N. W. 110), where the contract, though somewhat informal, contained the essential elements of a contract:

> “The parties, property, consideration, terms, and time of performance are clearly stated.”

In the instant case the writing does not contain the terms and time of the performance. The case is within *Gault*v. *Stormont,*51 Mich. 636 (17 N. W. 214), and *Ebert*v. *Cullen,*165 Mich. 75 (130 N. W. 185, 33 L. R. A. [N. S.] 84), and the many cases cited therein.

The decree is reversed, and one may be entered here in accordance with this opinion, with costs to defendant.

Stone, C. J., and Kuhn, Ostrander, Bird, Steere, Brooke, and Person, JJ., concurred.
#### § 216.5 Existing permits.

“Foreign aircraft permits” issued by the Department under the provisions of part 375 of this chapter (the Department's Special Regulations), authorizing the combined carriage of blind sector traffic as defined in this part, shall continue in effect in accordance with their terms until their expiration date unless sooner terminated, revoked or modified by the Department. Such permits shall, upon the effective date of this part, be deemed to constitute a Special Authorization issued pursuant to § 216.4.

[ER-525, 33 FR 692, Jan. 19, 1968, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15926, Apr. 16, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL IMFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,811
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,226
<PP&E>                                          14,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,655)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 553,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,450
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,004,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   553,841
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               574,376
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (574,850)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (574,850)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (574,850)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF BRADLEY E. SPARKS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bradley E. Sparks, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 16, 2006



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/    BRADLEY E. SPARKS
|Bradley E. Sparks       
|Chief Financial Officer
#### § 25.1519 Weight, center of gravity, and weight distribution.

The airplane weight, center of gravity, and weight distribution limitations determined under §§ 25.23 through 25.27 must be established as operating limitations.