alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Playboy  Enterprises,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly  period ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Christie Hefner, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Linda G. Havard,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christie Hefner
-------------------
Name:  Christie Hefner
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 8, 2005


/s/ Linda Havard
----------------
Name:  Linda G. Havard
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  November 8, 2005

This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A  signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by ss.  906 has been
provided  to  Playboy  Enterprises,   Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Playboy
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### § 249.8 Premature loss or destruction of records.

If records are destroyed or lost before the expiration of the prescribed retention period, a statement shall be prepared and submitted to the Director, Office of Airline Information, which lists, as accurately as possible, the unavailable records and describes the circumstances under which they became unavailable.

[ER-1214, 46 FR 25415, May 6, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 66725, Dec. 26, 1995]
Exhibit 10.6
20% ECCC Assignment
ASSIGNMENT
THIS LEASE ASSIGNMENT made and entered into and effective July 1 2003 executed
in triplicate originals by and between Eastern Consolidated Energy, Inc.
("ECEI") and Eastern Consolidated Coal Corp ("ECCC").

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, ECEI as Lessee, holds rights in and to the Warfield property (the
"Property") described in that certain Lease Agreement which will be
subsequently attached as Exhibit "A" hereof; and

WHEREAS, ECEI desires to assign a twenty percent (20%) Net Working Interest to
ECCC in exchange for its consulting and services for the past two years on the
Dempsey Heirs Lease; and

WHEREAS, ECEI is willing to assign the twenty percent (20%) New Working
Interest in the Dempsey Heirs lease, upon the terms and conditions set out
herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants
set forth below, the adequacy and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, ECEI and ECCC agree as follows:
1. ECEI hereby assigns a twenty percent (20%) Net Working Interest (the net
profit before income tax and the deduction of any loss from a prior month will
be recouped before payment is made) to ECCC, without warranties of any kind
except those listed in (a) & (b) below, the same percentage of its right,
title and interest in the Lease, and ECEI warrants that:
(a) It will furnish ECCC with true and complete copies of the Lease; and
(b) It is not in default on the Lease, and has not received any notice of
default from any Lessor (the "Lessors") on the Lease.
2. ECCC hereby accepts the twenty percent (20%) assignment of ECEI's right,
title and interest in and to the Lease.
3.  It is understood by both ECEI and ECCC that the Agreement may require
future modifications to adequately reflect specific changes in the lease,
and/or to correct any errors or omissions contained herein or not
contemplated. ECEI and ECCC hereby agree to provide full and timely
cooperation on any such modifications and for any reasonable requests for
information to support this Agreement.
4. By this Lease Assignment, ECEI assigns to ECCC only such rights and
privileges as it possesses under the Lease and no more.
5. Notices required hereunder shall be sent certified mail to the addresses
specified below and shall be effective as of the date postmarked thereon.

To ECEI:                               To ECCC:
Larry Hunt                             Jeff E. Miller
9900 W Sample Rd. Suite #300           9900 W Sample Rd. Suite #300
Coral Springs, FL 33065                Coral Springs, FL 33065

6. The rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall be interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.
7. This Assignment shall not be modified or amended except in writing executed
by both parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the day
and year first written above.

BY:/s/Jeff E. Miller                  BY:/s/Larry Hunt
Jeff E. Miller, V President ECCC      Larry Hunt, President ECEI
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 1999, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), SMC Research Consortium has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to                           ( print page 24985)                        actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are The Budd Company, Troy, MI; Cambridge Industries, Inc., Madison Heights, MI; and Venture Holdings Corporation, doing business as Bailey Manufacturing Corporation, Fraser, MI. The nature and objectives of the venture are to engage in joint research projects to address, analyze and resolve manufacturing problems common to molders of plastic sheet molding compounds including, for example, coatings; edge finishing; repair systems; surface measurement; and shipping rack design.                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-10597  Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Endocrine Disruptor 

Screening Program:

Tier 1 Screening Battery (T1S)

Assay Performance

Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Assay Performance

Presentations

• In vitro Assays:

 Gregory Akerman

• In vivo Mammalian Assays:

 John Liccione

• Fish Short Term Reproduction Assay:

 Amy Blankinship

• Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay:

 Catherine Aubee 

2
Assay Performance

Goals of Analysis

•Evaluate how well each Tier 1 assays can 

be executed based on defined 

performance criteria

•Highlight any issues associated with 

interpretation of responses within each 

assay

3
Selection of Case Studies

 21 test chemicals selected

 Represents:

• chemical space of the 52 pesticide actives available for 

consideration

• broad range of physical-chemical properties e.g., water solubility, 

octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow), and volatility

• range of chemical classes (e.g., organophosphates, imides, 

azoles) and pesticidal activities (e.g., fungicides, herbicides, 

insecticides).

 Number of case study chemicals evaluated for each assay differs 

since some assays were previously satisfied by

“Other Scientifically Relevant Information” (OSRI)

• OSRI = existing data used to satisfy test guideline requirements 

4
Assay Performance

Assay Type Number of Case Studies Evaluated

In Vitro

Estrogen Receptor Binding 18

Estrogen Receptor Transcriptional 

Activation 19

Androgen Receptor 17

Steroidogenesis 18

Aromatase 18

In Vivo

Uterotrophic 17

Hershberger 17

Pubertal Female 17

Pubertal Male 16

Fish Short-Term Reproduction 21

Amphibian Metamorphosis 18

Number of Chemicals Included in Assay Performance Analysis

5
Data Review Process

 Set of standard evaluation procedures (SEPs) for review of data submitted in 

response to the test orders for the EDSP Tier 1 assays

 SEPs used in conjunction with the appropriate EDSP Test Guideline 

 Data Evaluation Record (DER) prepared for each submitted assay that 

reflects how well the assay conforms to the Series 890 EDSP Test Guidelines 

and documents basic information on materials, methods and results of the 

study

 Multi-tiered approach to reviewing data submissions 

• Primary review by Agency/contract scientist to develop DER

• Secondary review of DER by Agency scientist trained to review test guideline study 

and is experienced in reviewing data for the specific test chemical 

• Interdisciplinary committee review 

• Evaluates each assay concurrently to ensure consistency in interpretation

6
Notes

Performance Criteria: 

Purpose: to provide confidence that a study is 

scientifically sound

• Reference or control chemicals, where applicable

• Study parameters/conditions

Overt Toxicity: 

• Observed in some of the In vivo studies

7
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>          0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>         0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>           0
<EQUITIES>                    0
<MORTGAGE>                    0
<REAL-ESTATE>                 0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                193,003
<CASH>                        36,052
<RECOVER-REINSURE>            22,809
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>        3,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                297,559
<POLICY-LOSSES>               101,636
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>           24,522
<POLICY-OTHER>                0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>         0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>               34,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
 <PREFERRED>                  0
<COMMON>                      0
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  297,559
<PREMIUMS>                    39,283
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>           2,691
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>            177
<OTHER-INCOME>                8,042
<BENEFITS>                    27,996
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>   11,909
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>          5,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>               5,220
<INCOME-TAX>                  1,560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  3,660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0.60
<RESERVE-OPEN>                0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>           0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>             0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>            0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>              0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>               0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>       0
        

</TABLE>
#### JOHNSON v STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 90-2690-AC-A (Lower Court Case No. 90-4577-MM-A-41)

Fifth Judicial Circuit, Marion County

March 25, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Charles R. Holloman, Esquire, for appellant.

Robert. Hodges, Assistant State Attorney, for appellee.

Before McNEAL, BOOTH, SINGELTARY, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

At trial the *defense attorney*questioned the officer about what defendant said at the time of his arrest and why the officer had not included the statements in his report. The officer replied, “they weren’t confessing what they had done, so I did not write it down.” The defense attorney then made a Motion for Mistrial claiming the officer had improperly commented on defendant’s right to remain silent. Because the comment on defendant’s exercise of his Fifth Amendment *16privilege was invited by the defendant, he cannot seek reversal based on that comment. *Clark v State,*363 So.2d 331, 335 (Fla. 1978).

AFFIRMED. McNEAL, R., BOOTH, J., SINGELTARY, G., concur.
KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



                  WHEREAS, KeySpan Corporation, a New York corporation (the
"Company"), intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K
as prescribed by said Commission pursuant to said Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.

                  NOW, THEREFORE, in my capacity either as a director or
officer, or both as the case may be, of the Company, I do hereby appoint RONALD
S. JENDRAS, GERALD LUTERMAN, RICHARD A. RAPP, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and
each of them severally, as my attorneys-in-fact with power to execute in my name
and place, and in my capacity as a director, officer, or both, as the case may
be, of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any amendment to said Report and any
other documents required in connection therewith, and to file the same with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney
this 7th day of March, 2002.




                         /s/Robert B. Catell
                        ----------------------------------
                        Robert B. Catell
                        Chief Executive Officer and
                        Chairman of the
                        Board of Directors
230519 ORD RE MARICEL ORTIZ CORTES MOT VERSION MAY 19, 2023 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et 

al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER CONCERNING LETTER FILED BY MARICEL ORTIZ CORTÉS (DOCKET ENTRY NO. 24232)

The Court has received and reviewed the letter filed on May 15, 2023 (Docket

Entry No. 24232 in Case No. 17-3283) (the “Motion”), by Maricel Ortiz Cortés (“Movant”). 

The Motion appears to request that the Court reconsider its Order Granting the Three Hundred 

Seventy-Fourth Omnibus Objection (Substantive) of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Puerto 

Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority, 

Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and 

Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority to Late-Filed Claims (Docket Entry No. 23849 in Case 

No. 17-3283).

The Motion is written in the Spanish language, and no English language 

translation was provided. United States law and the Court’s rules require that all documents 

submitted to the Court must be in English (or be translated into English). See 48 U.S.C. § 864; 

see also District of Puerto Rico Local Civil Rule 5(c). The Motion is therefore denied. The 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) 

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-

BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways 

and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the 

Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-

BK-3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric 

Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17- BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits 

of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) 

(Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24262 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/19/23 11:50:33 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
230519 ORD RE MARICEL ORTIZ CORTES MOT VERSION MAY 19, 2023 2

Court will consider the Motion if Movant submits it to the Court in English.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 19, 2023

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24262 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/19/23 11:50:33 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 23.2520 High-intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF) protection. ( a ) Each electrical and electronic system that performs a function, the failure of which would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane, must be designed and installed such that— ( 1 ) The function at the airplane level is not adversely affected during and after the time the airplane is exposed to the HIRF environment; and
( 2 ) The system recovers normal operation of that function in a timely manner after the airplane is exposed to the HIRF environment, unless the system's recovery conflicts with other operational or functional requirements of the system.
( b ) For airplanes approved for IFR operations, each electrical and electronic system that performs a function, the failure of which would significantly reduce the capability of the airplane or the ability of the flightcrew to respond to an adverse operating condition, must be designed and installed such that the system recovers normal operation of that function in a timely manner after the airplane is exposed to the HIRF environment.
[Doc. No. FAA-2015-1621, Amdt. 23-64, 81 FR 96689, Dec. 30, 2016, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. 23-65, 87 FR 75710, Dec. 9, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25088]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-1-000]


High Majestic Wind Energy Center, LLC; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

October 9, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
High Majestic Wind Energy Center, LLC application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 29, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dd9b988f9e92b3b1b4b3b88ea8adadb2afa99dbbb8afbef3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c68083948589a8aaafa8a395b3b6b6a9b4b286a0a3b4a5e8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-25088 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 35.21 Variable and reversible pitch propellers. ( a ) No single failure or malfunction in the propeller system will result in unintended travel of the propeller blades to a position below the in-flight low-pitch position. The extent of any intended travel below the in-flight low-pitch position must be documented by the applicant in the appropriate manuals. Failure of structural elements need not be considered if the occurrence of such a failure is shown to be extremely remote under § 35.15.
( b ) For propellers incorporating a method to select blade pitch below the in-flight low pitch position, provisions must be made to sense and indicate to the flight crew that the propeller blades are below that position by an amount defined in the installation manual. The method for sensing and indicating the propeller blade pitch position must be such that its failure does not affect the control of the propeller.
[Amdt. 35-8, 73 FR 63347, Oct. 24, 2008]