alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 29.1555 Control markings. ( a ) Each cockpit control, other than primary flight controls or control whose function is obvious, must be plainly marked as to its function and method of operation.
( b ) For powerplant fuel controls— ( 1 ) Each fuel tank selector valve control must be marked to indicate the position corresponding to each tank and to each existing cross feed position;
( 2 ) If safe operation requires the use of any tanks in a specific sequence, that sequence must be marked on, or adjacent to, the selector for those tanks; and
( 3 ) Each valve control for any engine of a multiengine rotorcraft must be marked to indicate the position corresponding to each engine controlled.
( c ) Usable fuel capacity must be marked as follows: ( 1 ) For fuel systems having no selector controls, the usable fuel capacity of the system must be indicated at the fuel quantity indicator unless it is: ( i ) Provided by another system or equipment readily accessible to the pilot; and
( ii ) Contained in the limitations section of the rotorcraft flight manual.
( 2 ) For fuel systems having selector controls, the usable fuel capacity available at each selector control position must be indicated near the selector control.
( d ) For accessory, auxiliary, and emergency controls— ( 1 ) Each essential visual position indicator, such as those showing rotor pitch or landing gear position, must be marked so that each crewmember can determine at any time the position of the unit to which it relates; and
( 2 ) Each emergency control must be red and must be marked as to method of operation.
( e ) For rotorcraft incorporating retractable landing gear, the maximum landing gear operating speed must be displayed in clear view of the pilot.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-12, 41 FR 55474, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 29-24, 49 FR 44440, Nov. 6, 1984; Amdt. 29-59, 88 FR 8740, Feb. 10, 2023]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PR, as 

representative of the COMMONWEALTH

OF PR et. al.

Debtors

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(jointly administered) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

TO THE HONORABLE COURT

COMES NOW the undersigned attorney, and respectfully states and prays

1. The undersigned has been retained by creditor María Elena Alonso Fuentes and 

respectfully appears as attorney for said creditor in these proceedings. 

2. It is requested that the undersigned be included in the mailing list, and that all 

notifications related to this case be sent to the undersigned attorney at his address stated below.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED 

San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 16, 2018

I certify that on this same date I filed the foregoing by uploading to the CM/ECF System, 

which will send automatic notices to the parties and/or attorneys of record 

S/ JORGE LUIS GUERRERO-CALDERÓN

JORGE LUIS GUERRERO-CALDERÓN

USDC-PR 116806

Attorney for Creditor 

María E. Alonso Fuentes

301 Calle Recinto Sur, Suite 502

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901-1945

tuttieguerrero@yahoo.com

(787) 723-3355 fax (787) 721-2126

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3071 Filed:05/16/18 Entered:05/16/18 14:46:59 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129389 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DELON SHANDELL GRANT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129389 

 COA: 263353 

Macomb CC: 2005-001058-AH 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 11

- 00183

- CR

JOHNNY RAY BURNES

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10

- 01846

- CRF

- 272

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Johnny Ray Burn e s appeal ed his criminal conviction. Burn e s no longer wishes to

pursue his appeal and has filed a motion to withdraw his notice of appeal. Burn e s

personally signed the motion.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a).

TOM GRAY

Chief JusticeBurnes v. Sta te Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed Ju ly 6, 2011

Do not publish

[CR25]
§ 29.1585 Operating procedures. ( a ) The parts of the manual containing operating procedures must have information concerning any normal and emergency procedures, and other information necessary for safe operation, including the applicable procedures, such as those involving minimum speeds, to be followed if an engine fails.
( b ) For multiengine rotorcraft, information identifying each operating condition in which the fuel system independence prescribed in § 29.953 is necessary for safety must be furnished, together with instructions for placing the fuel system in a configuration used to show compliance with that section.
( c ) For helicopters for which a V*NE* (power-off) is established under § 29.1505(c), information must be furnished to explain the V*NE* (power-off) and the procedures for reducing airspeed to not more than the V*NE* (power-off) following failure of all engines.
( d ) For each rotorcraft showing compliance with § 29.1353 (c)(6)(ii) or (c)(6)(iii), the operating procedures for disconnecting the battery from its charging source must be furnished.
( e ) If the unusable fuel supply in any tank exceeds 5 percent of the tank capacity, or 1 gallon, whichever is greater, information must be furnished which indicates that when the fuel quantity indicator reads “zero” in level flight, any fuel remaining in the fuel tank cannot be used safely in flight.
( f ) Information on the total quantity of usable fuel for each fuel tank must be furnished.
( g ) For Category B rotorcraft, the airspeeds and corresponding rotor speeds for minimum rate of descent and best glide angle as prescribed in § 29.71 must be provided.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Amdt. 29-2, 32 FR 6914, May 5, 1967, as amended by Amdt. 29-15, 43 FR 2328, Jan. 16, 1978; Amdt. 29-17, 43 FR 50602, Oct. 30, 1978; Amdt. 29-24, 49 FR 44440, Nov. 6, 1984]
BULLETIN. 1047 PLATE 3

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

§ naedenmms Eninmenaee i
& Secogsense erqeeese° ai ry °

s gun+

Gel
rt ey

ae
By
ral 3
a Q a;

a oO

6 2 :
oO &
‘ 8 iH

Z & 3

= io) a a

, ;

ing | 2 H &

a a

| a8

2 §

a cf i

Pa 8

9 1)
Ww
oO
a
< s
ro} iE
ie)
>
ft
al
Q io)
W Ww
o @|
ol Ww
< |
Q |
re) | al
Q Ss | w
w Zz a}
o 5 a
a 5 <
< < QO)
ro) S 5
0 md
a Ww)
: :
s fe)
o fs)
a =
9°
F]
|
C fay
Ww
a
a
; g
- Os o
f 3}
zg =|
| a 8
uel >
| © is
<
8 sf
i) Ww
Zz} iz,
<| Zz
5 5
<
ao
iW | = ONO Mm
o Ets lereee
Roo: |

+

397712 © -56 (In pocket)

SECTIONS OF COAL BEDS EXPOSED IN THE WHITE OAK QUADRANGLE, MAGOFFIN AND MORGAN COUNTIES, KENTUCKY
#### WEBB v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 11, 1916.)

Appeal from Autauga Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

No counsel marked for appellant W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
From: Fitzsimmons, Catharine [DNR] [mailto:Catharine.Fitzsimmons@dnr.iowa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:58 PM

To: Tapp, Joshua

Cc: Algoe-Eakin, Amy; McGraw, Jim [DNR]; Paulson, Christine [DNR]

Subject: Request to amend SIP revision request for Linn County ordinance updates

September 18, 2014

Dear Josh:

On August 15, 2014, Iowa DNR amended the SIP revision requests for Linn County ordinance 

updates submitted for SIP revisions during the period 2008-2013. This email amends the August 

15, 2014, request and asks EPA to take no action on the definition of “Significant” under Linn 

County ordinance 10.2 as it relates to PM2.5.

Linn County has already updated this definition in their FY15 rulemaking that is currently under 

consideration by the Linn County Board of Health. Linn County will default to the state’s definition 

until their rulemaking is completed. Inclusion of this definition update in the Iowa SIP will be 

requested in a future SIP revision request to EPA.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Please contact Jim McGraw (515-725-9543) of my 

staff if you have questions or need additional information.

Sincerely,

- Catharine

Catharine Fitzsimmons, Air Quality Bureau Chief

Iowa Department of Natural Resources 

P 515.725.9534 | F 515.725.9501 | 

catharine.fitzsimmons@dnr.iowa.gov

Air Quality Bureau | 7900 Hickman Rd., Ste. 1 | Windsor 

Heights, IA 50324

www.IowaCleanAir.gov | Air Construction Permit Hotline 

877.247.4692

WWW.IOWADNR.GOV

Leading Iowans in Caring for Our Natural Resources.
#### Matthew J. Conlin, Appellant, *v.*F. W. Kraft & Sons Company et al., Respondents.

(Submitted October 19, 1936;

decided October 23, 1936.)

Motion to amend the remittitur or for a reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 271 N. Y. 499.)
#### § 27.873 Ballast provisions.

Ballast provisions must be designed and constructed to prevent inadvertent shifting of ballast in flight.
§ 257.2 Applicability. This part applies to the following: ( a ) Direct air carriers and foreign air carriers that participate in code-sharing arrangements or long-term wet leases involving scheduled passenger air transportation; and
( b ) Ticket agents doing business in the United States that sell scheduled passenger air transportation services involving code-sharing arrangements or long-term wet leases.
§ 325.5 Determinations and designations. DOT will issue a determination of the essential level of air service for a place within 6 months after each of the following events: ( a ) A notice is received that service to an eligible place will be reduced to only one carrier that holds a section 41102 certificate;
( b ) A place is designated as an eligible place under 49 U.S.C. 41731 and either paragraph (c) or (d) of this section or § 325.7(e); or
( c ) A review was conducted of essential air service of that place under § 325.6.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15938, Apr. 16, 2019]
Exhibit 23.1

 

**Consent of Independent Accountants’**

 

 

The Board of Directors

Composite Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries

3252 Holiday Court, Suite 206

La Jolla, California  92037-1808

 

Asthe independent public accountants’ for Composite Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries,we hereby consent to the incorporation in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB ofComposite Solutions, Inc., our report dated January 25, 2002, regarding theSeptember 30, 2001 and 2000, consolidated financial statements.  We also consent to all other references toour company included in this annual report.

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                Peterson & Co.

 

Peterson & Co.

3655 Nobel Drive, Suite 500

San Diego, California  92122-1089
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jitu Banker, Chief Financial Officer of Gateway International Holdings, Inc.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d))  and that  information  contained  in this  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004,  fairly presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway
International Holdings, Inc.


By: /s/Jitu Banker
      -----------------------------
Name:   Jitu Banker
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: July 27, 2005


                                       57
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Executive Panel

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The CNO Executive Panel is to conduct the final briefing of 
the Navy Energy Strategy Short Study to the Chief of Naval Operations. 
This meeting will consist of discussions relating to proposed Navy 
Energy Strategy.

DATE: The meeting will be held on May 31, 2000 from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the office of the Chief of Naval 
Operations, 2000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commander Christopher Agan, CNO 
Executive Panel, 4401 Ford Avenue, Suite 601, Alexandria, Virginia 
22302-0268, (703) 681-6205.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), these matters constitute 
classified information that is specifically authorized by Executive 
Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense and are, in 
fact, properly classified pursuant to such Executive Order. 
Accordingly, the Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing that 
the public interest requires that all sessions of the meeting be closed 
to the public because they will be concerned with matters listed in 
section 552b(c)(1) of title 5, United States Code.

    Dated: April 27, 2000.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, Federal Register 
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-11506 Filed 5-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
§ 27.1316 Electrical and electronic system lightning protection. ( a ) Each electrical and electronic system that performs a function, for which failure would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the rotorcraft, must be designed and installed so that— ( 1 ) The function is not adversely affected during and after the time the rotorcraft is exposed to lightning; and
( 2 ) The system automatically recovers normal operation of that function in a timely manner after the rotorcraft is exposed to lightning.
( b ) For rotorcraft approved for instrument flight rules operation, each electrical and electronic system that performs a function, for which failure would reduce the capability of the rotorcraft or the ability of the flightcrew to respond to an adverse operating condition, must be designed and installed so that the function recovers normal operation in a timely manner after the rotorcraft is exposed to lightning.
[Doc. No. FAA-2010-0224, Amdt. 27-46, 76 FR 33135, June 8, 2011]
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.27 Rights of witnesses; attendance fees and mileage. ( a ) Any person appearing as a witness in any proceeding governed by this part, whether in response to a subpoena or by request or permission of the Department, may be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel and may be examined by that counsel after other questioning.
( b ) Any person who submits data or evidence in a proceeding governed by this part, whether in response to a subpoena or by request or permission of the Department, may retain, or, on payment of lawfully prescribed costs, procure, a copy of any document so submitted or a copy of any transcript made of such testimony.
( c ) No person whose attendance at a hearing or whose deposition is to be taken shall be obliged to respond to a subpoena unless upon a service of the subpoena he or she is tendered attendance fees and mileage by the party at whose instance he or she is called in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section; *Provided,* That a witness summoned at the instance of the Department or one of its employees, or a salaried employee of the United States summoned to testify as to matters related to his or her public employment, need not be tendered such fees or mileage at that time. ( 1 ) Witnesses who are not salaried employees of the United States, or such employees summoned to testify on matters not related to their public employment, shall be paid the same per diem, subsistence, and mileage fees paid to witnesses for like service in the courts of the United States that are in effect at the time of travel; *Provided,* That no employee, officer, or attorney of an air carrier who travels under the free or reduced rate provisions of section 41511 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII shall be entitled to any fees or mileage; *And provided further,* That such fees and mileage shall not be applicable for witnesses summoned to testify in Alaska, and that, in Alaska, where permitted by section 41511 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, the witness may, at his or her option, accept a pass for travel by air. Such witnesses shall be furnished appropriate forms and instructions for the submission of claims for attendance fees, subsistence, and mileage from the Government before the close of the proceedings that they are required to attend. Only persons summoned by subpoena shall be entitled to claim attendance fees, subsistence, or mileage from the Government.
( 2 ) Witnesses who are salaried employees of the United States and who are summoned to testify on matters relating to their public employment, irrespective of at whose instance they are summoned, shall be paid in accordance with applicable Government regulations.
November 3, 2011 

## EPA’s **Questions for Reverse Distributors**

**General Questions about the Returns Process** 1. Who initiates the return? Does the RD alert the healthcare facility that credit is available for certain pharmaceuticals or do health care facilities periodically go through inventory to return un - needed items? 2. Do es the RD have reps that go to healthcare facilities to pull and prepare pharmaceuticals for shipment to the RD? If so, does the rep know which items will/will not receive credit? 3. Is credit received per conta iner? Per pill if container has been opened? 4. Do healthcare facilities return pharmaceuticals from the patient floors (e.g., drugs that have been re

- packaged)? Are re

- packaged pharmaceuticals creditable? 5. Once the shipment arrives at the RD facility, what i s the timeframe for processing? 6. Are generic brands creditable? 7. Do expired items typically get credit? 8. How is the RD paid for its services? Does the RD receive a percentage of the credit? Is there a flat fee? Are there additional charges to the healthcare facility for waste management? 9. Under what circumstances would a healthcare facility return pharmaceuticals to a (forward) distributor in lieu of sending to a RD? Do you process pharmaceuticals from (forward) distributors? 10. When pharmaceuticals are received at the RD, are they ever shipped to another RD’s facility for crediting? 11. Do you accept non
- pharmaceutical products? 12. How long are pharmaceuticals kept on

-site after providing credit? How long are the pharmaceuticals that become hazardous wastes kept on

-site? On average how long does it take a pharmaceutical to cycle through your facility? **Shipment** 1. Are returned pharmaceuticals shipped to the RD via commercial mail carrier or USPS or private hauler ? Is the shipment tracked and is the healthcare facili ty notified by the RD that the shipment has been received? Do healthcare facilities notify the RD that a shipment has been sent? 2. Does the board of pharmacy require RDs to keep an inventory of everything received at an RD? 3. Are controlled substances shipped separately from other pharmaceuticals? Can you explain more about the process of handling returned controlled substances? 4. Have there been incidences where shipments have been lost or stolen?November 3, 2011

**Waste Determination and Management** 1. What percentage of returned pharmaceuticals is typically RCRA hazardous waste once it is determined credit will or will not be given? Typically, do pharmaceuticals that meet RCRA’s definition of a hazardous waste get credit? Do you ever manage non
- hazardous pharmaceutical s as RCRA hazardous waste? 2. Is the manufacturer always contacted prior to disposal of a creditable pharmaceutical? For a non -creditable pharmaceutical? 3. What percentage of returned pharmaceuticals is sent back to the manufacturer versus being disposed of directly by the RD?
§ 1253.310 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment.* A recipient to which §§ 1253.300 through 1253.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and admission of students. A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 1253.110(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 1253.110(b).
( b ) *Recruitment at certain institutions.* A recipient to which §§ 1253.300 through 1253.310 apply shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at educational institutions, schools, or entities that admit as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 1253.300 through 1253.310.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3958 Filed:09/21/18 Entered:09/21/18 16:17:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3958 Filed:09/21/18 Entered:09/21/18 16:17:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3958 Filed:09/21/18 Entered:09/21/18 16:17:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3958 Filed:09/21/18 Entered:09/21/18 16:17:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3958 Filed:09/21/18 Entered:09/21/18 16:17:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 5
#### § 300.1 Judicial standards of practice.

Certain of DOT's functions involving aviation economic and enforcement proceedings are similar to those of a court, and parties to cases before DOT and those who represent such parties are expected—in fact and in appearance—to conduct themselves with honor and dignity as they would before a court. By the same token, any DOT employee or administrative law judge carrying out DOT's quasi-judicial functions and any DOT employee making recommendations or advising them are expected to conduct themselves with the same fidelity to appropriate standards of propriety that characterize a court and its staff. The standing and effectiveness of DOT in carrying out its quasi-judicial functions are in direct relation to the observance by DOT, DOT employees, and the parties and attorneys appearing before DOT of the highest standards of judicial and professional ethics. The rules of conduct set forth in this part are to be interpreted in light of those standards.

[Doc. No. 82, 50 FR 2380, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended at 60 FR 43528, Aug. 22, 1995]