alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charles H. Clark *vs.*The George E. Sykes Company.

First Judicial District, Hartford,

May Term, 1916.

Prentice, C. J., Thayer, Roraback, Wheeler and Beach, Js.

Upon an application to this court for an order requiring the trial judge to make a finding of facts in the case, the date given in the judgment-file will be treated as the date upon which the judgment was in fact rendered; for that statement, like other averments of the record, is conclusive in this court, until it has been altered or amended in the regular and proper way.

A trial judge is not bound to make a finding of facts if the request therefor is not seasonably filed.

Argued May 2d

decided June 2d, 1916.

Application to this court for an order requiring the trial judge in the Superior Court to file a finding of facts.

*Application dismissed.*

*Terry J. Chapin,*for the applicant (plaintiff).

*J. Gilbert Calhoun,*for the respondent (defendant).

Thayer, J.

This is an application under the Public Acts of 1905, chapter 58, p. 286, brought to this court by the plaintiff in the above-entitled case in the Superior Court, asking us to order the trial judge to make a *554finding of facts in the case. A copy of the judgment-file in the case is made a part of the application, wherein it appears that the judgment was rendered on the 24th day of July, 1915. The applicant alleges that he filed a notice of appeal on the 12th day of November, 1915, and a request for a finding and a draft-finding on the 12th day of November, and that the judgment was not in fact rendered until the 8th day of November, 1915. The record of the Superior Court is conclusive in this court as to the facts stated therein. *Bulkeley’s Appeal,*76 Conn. 454, 456, 57 Atl. 112. For the purposes of this application, therefore, we are to consider the 24th of July as the date of the judgment. If the plaintiff desired to appeal from the judgment he was bound to file with the clerk of the Superior Court a notice of his intention to do so within one week after the rendition of the judgment, and to file his request for a finding and draft-finding within two weeks after the rendition of the judgment; General Statutes, §§ 790, 793; but as the judgment was rendered in vacation, the time for filing did not begin to run until September 1st. The application shows that these papers were not filed in time. The trial judge, therefore, was not bound to make a finding, and we have no power under the statute to order him to do so.

If, as claimed by the applicant, the Superior Court record does not speak the truth, it must in the proper way be made to do so before a mandatory order like that now asked for can be granted.

The application is dismissed.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.
Executive Order 13154

# Establishing the Kosovo Campaign Medal

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including my authority as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

**Section 1.***Kosovo Campaign Medal.*                     There is hereby established the Kosovo Campaign Medal with suitable appurtenances. Except as limited in section 2 of this order, and under uniform regulations to be prescribed by the Secretaries of the Military Departments and approved by the Secretary of Defense, or under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of Transportation with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, the Kosovo Campaign Medal shall be awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who serve or have served in Kosovo or contiguous waters or airspace, as defined by such regulations, after March 24, 1999, and before a terminal date to be prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.                

**Sec. 2.***Relationship to Other Awards.*                     Notwithstanding section 3 of Executive Order 10977 of December 4, 1961, establishing the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and section 3 of Executive Order 12985 of January 11, 1996, establishing the Armed Forces Service Medal, any member who qualified for those medals by reasons of service in Kosovo between March 24, 1999, and May 1, 2000, shall remain qualified for those medals. Upon application, any such member may be awarded the Kosovo Campaign Medal in lieu of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal or the Armed Forces Service Medal, but no person may be awarded more than one of these three medals by reason of service in Kosovo, and no person shall be entitled to more than one award of the Kosovo Campaign Medal.                

**Sec. 3.***Posthumous Award.*                     The Kosovo Campaign Medal may be awarded posthumously to any person covered by and under regulations prescribed in accordance with the first section of this order.                

[FR Doc. 00-11532

Billing code 3195-01-P
| 1. | I      have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q      for the period ended March 31, 2008 of Playboy Enterprises, Inc.;      and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      February 20, 2009 | /s/      Linda G. Havard |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                         | Name:                    | Linda      G. Havard |
|                         | Title:                   | Executive      Vice President and |
|                         |                     | Chief      Financial Officer |
Order entered August 6, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00219
- CR ANDREW SCOTT LOTT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. F12
- 40454
- M



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS the State’s August 4, 2014 motion for extension of time to file the
State’s amended brief. The Court also GRANTS the State’s August 4, 2014 motion for leave to file brief exceeding the word count limit.
We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the State’s amended brief tendered as of the
date of this order.
We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to strike the State’s brief filed on June 11, 2014.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
§ 29.963 Fuel tanks: general. ( a ) Each fuel tank must be able to withstand, without failure, the vibration, inertia, fluid, and structural loads to which it may be subjected in operation.
( b ) Each flexible fuel tank bladder or liner must be approved or shown to be suitable for the particular application and must be puncture resistant. Puncture resistance must be shown by meeting the TSO-C80, paragraph 16.0, requirements using a minimum puncture force of 370 pounds.
( c ) Each integral fuel tank must have facilities for inspection and repair of its interior.
( d ) The maximum exposed surface temperature of all components in the fuel tank must be less by a safe margin than the lowest expected autoignition temperature of the fuel or fuel vapor in the tank. Compliance with this requirement must be shown under all operating conditions and under all normal or malfunction conditions of all components inside the tank.
( e ) Each fuel tank installed in personnel compartments must be isolated by fume-proof and fuel-proof enclosures that are drained and vented to the exterior of the rotorcraft. The design and construction of the enclosures must provide necessary protection for the tank, must be crash resistant during a survivable impact in accordance with § 29.952, and must be adequate to withstand loads and abrasions to be expected in personnel compartments.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34217, Sept. 2, 1988; Amdt. 29-35, 59 FR 50388, Oct. 3, 1994]
Deloitte
      & Touche LLP
                1 Place
      Ville Marie
                Suite
      3000
                Montreal QC
      H3B 4T9
                CanadaTel:
      514-393-7111Fax:
      514-390-4113www.deloite.ca














EXHIBIT
23.1


























CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS








We consent to the
use of our reports dated November 8, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial
statements of CGI Group Inc. (which includes comments by Independent Registered
Chartered Accountants for U.S. readers on Canada-U.S. reporting differences) and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this
Annual Report of CGI Group Inc. on Form 40-F for the year ended September 30,
2009.




We also consent
to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Nos. 333-112021,
333-13350, 333-66044, 333-74932 and 333-146175) on Form S-8 of our reports dated
November 8, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements of CGI Group
Inc. (which includes comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
for U.S. readers on Canada-U.S. reporting differences) and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form
40-F of CGI Group Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2009.










deloitte touche llp
            1




Independent
Registered Chartered Accountants


December 18,
2009








____________________


1Chartered accountant auditor permit No. 17046































Membre de/Member
of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
061617 ORDER RE ANDINO-GAUDÍN & APONTE-PAGÁN VERSION JUNE 16, 2017 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

----------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: PROMESA 

 Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered) 

et al., 

 Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x 

ORDER

 The Court has received and reviewed the Motion for Relief from Stay (the “Motion”) filed 

by Angely M. Aponte-Pagán and Javier Andino-Gaudín, as well as their respective co-Plaintiffs 

(collectively, the “Movants”). (Docket Entry No. 343.) Opposition papers to the Motion must 

be filed by June 29, 2017. Movant’s reply papers must be filed July 6, 2017. The Court will 

thereafter take the Motion on submission, unless a party thereto requests a hearing. 

 The Parties are further instructed to inform this Court, by filing of an informative motion 

not to exceed five (5) pages, of any rulings issued by the Court of First Instance of Puerto Rico 

with respect to the application of automatic stay in Andino-Gaudín et al. v. Rivero-Cubano, et 

al., Civil No. K AC2002-5558. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 16, 2017 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

 United States District Judge 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number listed as a bankruptcy case number due to software limitations and the last four (4) digits 

of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); 

and (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3284) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:353 Filed:06/16/17 Entered:06/16/17 08:14:53 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30DAY-26-00]
 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639-7090. Send written comments to CDC, Desk Officer; Human Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235; Washington, DC 20503. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice. Proposed Projects 1. PHS Supplements to the Application for Federal Assistance—SF 424 (0920-0428)—Extension—The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is requesting a three-year extension for continued use of the Supplements to the Request for Federal Assistance Application (SF-424). The Checklist, Program Narrative, and the Public Health System Impact Statement (third party notification) (PHSIS) are a part of the standard application for State and local governments and for private non-profit and for-profit organizations when applying for financial assistance from PHS grant programs. The Checklist assists applicants to ensure that they have included all required information necessary to process the application. The Checklist data helps to reduce the time required to process and review grant applications, expediting the issuance of grant awards. The PHSIS Third Party Notification Form is used to inform State and local health agencies of community-based proposals submitted by non-governmental applicants for Federal funding. We also requesting the use of a new CDC form (CDC 0.1113) to be used once an award is granted. This form will provide CDC specific assurances after an award is granted. Total annual hours burden are 31,204. Respondents
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses/respondent
Average 
                             burden/response (in hrs.)Program Narrative & Checklist
6,343
1
4CDC Form 0.0126 (E)
990
1
4CDC Form 0.1113
1,000
1
30/60Public Health Impact Statement (PHSIS)
2,845
2.5
10/60SSA (SAMHSA)
1,125
1
10/60
 Dated: May 1, 2000. Nancy Cheal, Acting Associate Director for Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).


[FR Doc. 00-11233 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Playboy Enterprises,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Christie Hefner, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Linda G. Havard,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christie Hefner
-------------------
Name:  Christie Hefner
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 9, 2007


/s/ Linda Havard
----------------
Name:  Linda G. Havard
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  August 9, 2007

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by ss. 906 has been
provided to Playboy Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Playboy
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 294
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 294 appear at 84 FR 15934, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 294.83 Compliance with certain international agreements. A registrant shall not operate any aircraft under this part unless it: ( a ) Complies with operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the Chicago Convention;
( b ) Complies with all applicable provisions of the Agreement; and
( c ) Complies with all applicable provisions of any treaty, convention, or agreement affecting international air transportation to which the United States and Canada are parties.
§ 25.933 Reversing systems. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 68734 , Aug. 27, 2024.
( a ) For turbojet reversing systems— ( 1 ) Each system intended for ground operation only must be designed so that during any reversal in flight the engine will produce no more than flight idle thrust. In addition, it must be shown by analysis or test, or both, that— ( i ) Each operable reverser can be restored to the forward thrust position; and
( ii ) The airplane is capable of continued safe flight and landing under any possible position of the thrust reverser.
( 2 ) Each system intended for inflight use must be designed so that no unsafe condition will result during normal operation of the system, or from any failure (or reasonably likely combination of failures) of the reversing system, under any anticipated condition of operation of the airplane including ground operation. Failure of structural elements need not be considered if the probability of this kind of failure is extremely remote.
( 3 ) Each system must have means to prevent the engine from producing more than idle thrust when the reversing system malfunctions, except that it may produce any greater forward thrust that is shown to allow directional control to be maintained, with aerodynamic means alone, under the most critical reversing condition expected in operation.
( b ) For propeller reversing systems— ( 1 ) Each system intended for ground operation only must be designed so that no single failure (or reasonably likely combination of failures) or malfunction of the system will result in unwanted reverse thrust under any expected operating condition. Failure of structural elements need not be considered if this kind of failure is extremely remote.
( 2 ) Compliance with this section may be shown by failure analysis or testing, or both, for propeller systems that allow propeller blades to move from the flight low-pitch position to a position that is substantially less than that at the normal flight low-pitch position. The analysis may include or be supported by the analysis made to show compliance with the requirements of § 35.21 of this chapter for the propeller and associated installation components.
[Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29784, July 20, 1990]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4162 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4162

               To provide certainty for airport funding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 2, 2020

  Mrs. Fischer (for herself, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Cruz, and Ms. Duckworth) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To provide certainty for airport funding.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Airport Infrastructure Readiness Act 
of 2020'' or the ``AIR Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPORTIONMENTS TO PRIMARY AIRPORTS.

    Section 47114(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
                    ``(J) Special rule for fiscal years 2022 and 
                2023.--Notwithstanding subparagraph (A) and the absence 
                of scheduled passenger aircraft service at an airport, 
                the Secretary shall apportion in fiscal years 2022 and 
                2023 to the sponsor of the airport an amount based on 
                the number of passenger boardings at the airport during 
                whichever of the following years that would result in 
                the highest apportioned amount:
                            ``(i) Calendar year 2018.
                            ``(ii) Calendar year 2019.
                            ``(iii) The prior full calendar year prior 
                        to the current fiscal year.''.

SEC. 3. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL CONTRACT PROGRAM.

    Notwithstanding section 47124(d)(1)(B) of title 49, United States 
Code, the Secretary of Transportation shall not calculate a benefit-to-
cost ratio with respect to an air traffic control tower participating 
in the Contract Tower Program on the basis of an annual aircraft 
traffic decrease in fiscal years 2020 and 2021.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002


 


I, Bryan
Needham, director of ONO Finance PLC, certify that to the best of my knowledge
(i) the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of ONO Finance PLC.


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Bryan
  Needham

  	
   

  
	
  Name:  Bryan Needham

  
	
  Title:  Director

  
	
  Date: