alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### *In*re Matter of Stephen YAGMAN, Appellant, Jerry BROWN and Gerry Fleisher, Plaintiffs, v. Michael BADEN and Sidney Weinberg, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 84-5957.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 6, 1986.

Stephen Yagman, Los Angeles, Cal., pro se.

Ramsey Clark, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Harry Schneider, Woodland Hills, Cal, Anthony A. De Corso, Mark E. Beck, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before ANDERSON, PREGERSON, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.

The panel as constituted in the above case has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for a rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for en banc rehearing, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App.P. 35(b). The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.

With this order, the slip opinion filed August 13,1986 [796 F.2d 1165], is amended by adding a new footnote 26, on page 46 [p. 1188] at the end of the second sentence in the second full paragraph ending with “sanctioning authority,” and renumbering footnote 26 at the end of the paragraph to be footnote 27, as follows:

> “Nothing we have said in this opinion should be construed to impair in any way, nor to preclude, an award based on bad faith conduct under the court’s inherent power, if found to be appropriate. *See, e.g., Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper,*447 U.S. 752 [100 S.Ct. 2455, 65 L.Ed.2d 488] (1980).”
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.210 Disposition of applications; orders establishing further procedures. ( a ) *General requirements.* The DOT decisionmaker will take one of the following actions with respect to all or any portion of each application: ( 1 ) Issue an Order to Show Cause why the application should not be granted, denied or dismissed, in whole or in part.
( 2 ) Issue a Final Order granting the application if the DOT decisionmaker determines that there are no material issues of fact that warrant further procedures for their resolution.
( 3 ) Issue a Final Order dismissing or rejecting the application for lack of prosecution or if the application does not comply with this subpart or is otherwise materially deficient.
( 4 ) Issue an order setting the application for oral evidentiary hearing. The order will establish the scope of the issues to be considered and the procedures to be employed, and will indicate whether one or more attorneys from the Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings will participate as a party. All of the procedures set forth in §§ 302.214 through 302.218 will apply unless the DOT decisionmaker decides otherwise.
( 5 ) Begin to make a determination with respect to the application under simplified procedures without oral evidentiary hearing. In this event, the DOT decisionmaker may indicate which, if any, of the procedural steps set forth in §§ 302.215 through 302.219 will be employed. The DOT decisionmaker may also indicate that other non-oral evidentiary hearing procedures will be employed.
( b ) *Additional evidence.* An order establishing further procedures under paragraph (a)(1), (4) or (5) of this section may provide for the filing of additional evidence.
( c ) *Petitions for reconsideration.* Petitions for reconsideration of an order issued under this section will not be entertained except to the extent that the order dismissed or rejected all or part of an application. If a petition for reconsideration results in the reinstatement of all or part of an application, the deadline for final Department decision established in § 302.220 will be calculated from the date of the order reinstating the application.
EXHIBIT D 

Summary of Marchand ICS Group Hours Worked and Fees Incurred 

Name of Professional Title Hourly Billing 

Rate 

Total Billed 

Hours 

Total Compensation 

Ferdinand Díaz Project Manager $125.00 58.70 $7,337.50 

Jorge Marchand Principal $175.00 223.00 $39,025.00 

Male Noguera Media Manager $95.00 197.30 $18,743.50 

Mari Carmen Schell Business Editor $110.00 158.30 $17,413.00 

Total 637.30 $82,519.00 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3536-4 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 15:53:09 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 1 of 1
#### § 293.2 Definitions.

For purposes of this part the definitions in § 221.3 of this chapter apply.
#### § 215.5 Procedure in case of similarity of names.

The Department will compare the proposed name in any registration filed under this part or in an application for new, reissued, or transferred authority with a list of names used by existing certificated, commuter and foreign direct air carriers. The Department will notify the applicant of any other certificated, foreign or commuter carriers that may have an identical or similar name. The registrant must then notify those carriers of its registration. The notification will identify the applicant and state its proposed name or the name requested, area of operation or proposed area of operation, type of business, and other pertinent matters. The registrant must then file a certificate of service of the notification with the Department.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quartely Report of UltraStrip Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Dennis McGuire, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ DENNISMCGUIRE      
| | Dennis McGuire,        
| | Chief Executive Officer
| |                        





Date:  August 9, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0107

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SHANE THOMPSON FREIBURG,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 22, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 15 2022

07/15/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0107
NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION File Na me: 07a0175n.06 Filed: Mar ch 2, 2007 No. 06-3476 U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A LS F O R T H E S IX T H C IR C U IT LUC R ETI A G. V I N T I LLA , Plain tif f- Ap pe lla nt, On Appea l from the v. United States District Court for the No rt he rn Di str ic t of

Oh io S AF EC O I

NS URANCE C OMPANY , Defendant-

Appellee
.

______________________________ Be fore : KENNEDY , BA TCHEL DER, and CLAY, Circuit J udg es P ER CURIAM . Lucre tia G. Vint illa appea ls the district court’s grant of summar y judgme nt in f avor of defe ndant Safec o Insuranc e Company and denial of her own summary judgme nt motion. After revie wingthe re cord, the parties’ briefs, a nd th e ap p l i ca b l e law, this cour t concludes that issuance of

a pane l opinion would not s erve any jurisprudential purpose
. Thus, we a ffirm the district court’s thorough and we ll-rea soned dec ision for the re asons stated within that opinion.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 422 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow deductions and 

credits relating to expenditures in connection with marijuana sales conducted in compliance with State law. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. BENNET, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow deductions and credits relating to expenditures in connection 

with marijuana sales conducted in compliance with State 

law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Tax 

5 Equity Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 422 IS

1 SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTIONS AND CREDITS RELAT2 ING TO EXPENDITURES IN CONNECTION 

3 WITH MARIJUANA SALES CONDUCTED IN 

4 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 280E of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting before the pe7 riod at the end the following: ‘‘, unless such trade or busi8 ness consists of marijuana sales conducted in compliance 

9 with State law’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 this section shall apply with respect to taxable years end12 ing after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 29.1355 Distribution system. ( a ) The distribution system includes the distribution busses, their associated feeders, and each control and protective device.
( b ) If two independent sources of electrical power for particular equipment or systems are required by this chapter, in the event of the failure of one power source for such equipment or system, another power source (including its separate feeder) must be provided automatically or be manually selectable to maintain equipment or system operation.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-14, 42 FR 36973, July 18, 1977; Amdt. 29-24, 49 FR 44439, Nov. 6, 1984]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 88 (Friday, May 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26268-26269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11326]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting on Noise 
Certification Issues

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Rulemaking 
Advisory Committee to discuss noise certification issues.

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 18, 2000, at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the General Aviation 
Manufacturers Association, 1400 K Street NW, Washington, DC

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Angela. O. Anderson, (202) 267-
9681, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-204), 800 Independence Avenue, SW, 
Washington, DC 20591.

[[Page 26269]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee 
(ARAC) to discuss noise certification issues. This meeting will be held 
May 18, 2000, at 10 a.m., at the General Aviation Manufacturers 
Association. The agenda for this meeting will include the presentation 
and vote on the NPRM from FAR/JAR Harmonization Working Group for 
Subsonic Transport Airplanes. Members of the public may obtain copies 
of this NPRM by contacting the person listed above under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT
    Attendance is open to the interested public but may be limited to 
the space available. The public must make arrangements in advance to 
present oral statements at the meeting or may present statements to the 
committee at any time. Written statements may be presented to the 
committee at any time by providing 16 copies to the Assistant Chair or 
by providing the copies at the meeting. If you are in need of 
assistance or require a reasonable accommodation for the meeting, 
please contact the person listed under the heading FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, sign and oral interpretation can be 
made available at the meeting, as well as an assistive listening 
device, is requested 10 calendar days before the meeting. Arrangements 
may be made by contacting the person listed under the heading FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 27, 2000.
Paul Dykeman,
Assistant Executive Director for Noise Certification Issues, Aviation 
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 00-11326 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been 

appealed to the Supreme Court: 

 

1. Timothy Lawerence Doscoli 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 0517-15-3 

 Opinion rendered by Judge Petty on 

 June 21, 2016 

2. Robert Van Buren, Sr. 

 v. Augusta County, et al. 

 Record No. 1975-15-3 

 Opinion rendered by Judge AtLee on 

 July 19, 2016 
 The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been 

disposed of by the Supreme Court: 

1. Mark O’Hara Wright 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 0585-13-3 

 Opinion rendered by Judge Petty 

 on November 18, 2014 

Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed and final judgment 

 entered in part by opinion rendered on August 18, 2016 (150181) 

2. Andrew Wallace 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 1476-14-1 

 Opinion rendered by Judge Petty 

 on July 28, 2015 

 Affirmed by order entered on June 2, 2016 (151296) 

3. Clayton George Smith 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 0427-14-4 

 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys 

 on October 31, 2015 

 Refused (151865) 

4. Cris R. Anderson 

 v. Cris R. Anderson, d/b/a Anderson Plumbing and Firstcomp Insurance Company 

 Record No. 0697-15-2 

 Opinion rendered by Judge Russell 

 on November 10, 2015 

 Dismissed pursuant to Code § 17.1-410(A)(2) and (B)

 (151873) 

5. Jerrell Cortez Edwards 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 0954-14-1 

 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien 

 on December 22, 2015 

Refused (160123) 

6. Marquis Durrell Jennings 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 0063-15-1 

 Opinion rendered by Judge AtLee 

 on December 22, 2015 

Refused (160131) 
 The Supreme Court issued an opinion in the following case, which had been 

appealed from this Court: 

1. Artvaius Darrell Scott 

v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

Record No. 0626-14-2 

CAV petition for appeal denied by Judge Kelsey on March 18, 2015 and by 

 Chief Judge Huff , Judges Beales and AtLee on May 20, 2015 

Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed by opinion rendered on August 18, 2016 

(150932)
#### § 25.1507 Maneuvering speed.

The maneuvering speed must be established so that it does not exceed the design maneuvering speed *V**A* determined under § 25.335(c).
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**RULE      13a-14(1) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Luigi DiCicco                          |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Luigi                DiCicco                              |   |
|   | Controller                and Principal Financial Officer |   |

----
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Nataliya Hearn, President and Director of Element 21 Golf Company (the
"Registrant"), certify that:





1.   I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;





2.   Based
on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
Report;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly
Report;





4.   The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Quarterly Report is being
prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5.   The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function);





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls;
and





6.   The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this Quarterly
Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.





Date:
      February 14, 2009
            
            By: 
      /s/ Nataliya HearnPresident
      and Director
Exhibit
      23.1


Deloitte
          & Touche LLP
 1
          Place
          Ville Marie
 Suite
          3000
 Montreal
          QC H3B 4T9
 Canada
 
 Tel:
          (514) 393-5246
 Fax:
          (514) 390-4113
 www.deloitte.ca
 
  
 
 CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
 
 We
        consent to the use of our reports dated November 13, 2006 relating to the
        financial statements of CGI Group Inc. (which includes comments by Independent
        Registered Chartered Accountants on Canada−United States of America reporting
        differences) and management’s report on internal control over financial
        reporting appearing in this Annual Report of CGI Group Inc. on Form 40−F for the
        year ended September 30, 2006.
 
 We
        also
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Nos.
        333−112021, 333−13350, 333−66044 and 333−74932) on Form S−8 of our reports dated
        November 13, 2006 relating to the financial statements of CGI Group Inc.
        (which
        includes comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on
        Canada−United States of America reporting differences) and management’s report
        on internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report
        on
        Form 40−F of CGI Group Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2006.
 
  
 
 Deloitte
&
Touche
        LLP
 Deloitte
        & Touche LLP
 Independent
        Registered Chartered Accountants
 November
        13, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Astrogeology Science Center 
-  Science 

#           MRCTR GIS Lab      

  Active

      By Astrogeology Science Center      September 24, 2018    

            -                Overview             

**The USGS Astrogeology Mapping, Remote-sensing, Cartography, Technology, and Research (MRCTR, pronounced "Mercator") GIS Lab provides** web-based resources aimed at the planetary research community. The lab supports Geographic Information Systems (GIS) graphical, statistical, and spatial tools for analyses of planetary data, including the distribution of planetary GIS tutorials, tools, programs, and information. We maintain planetary GIS databases consisting of peer-reviewed digital geologic maps, feature maps, topography, and remote-sensing data under the scientific oversight of the NASA Geologic Mapping Subcommittee (GeMS). In addition, the lab supports and encourages geospatial open standards.

 

Learn more about the MRCTR GIS lab

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                      - Mapping
                      - Labs and Facilities
                      - Research
                      - Planetary Science

View All **

**The USGS Astrogeology Mapping, Remote-sensing, Cartography, Technology, and Research (MRCTR, pronounced "Mercator") GIS Lab provides** web-based resources aimed at the planetary research community. The lab supports Geographic Information Systems (GIS) graphical, statistical, and spatial tools for analyses of planetary data, including the distribution of planetary GIS tutorials, tools, programs, and information. We maintain planetary GIS databases consisting of peer-reviewed digital geologic maps, feature maps, topography, and remote-sensing data under the scientific oversight of the NASA Geologic Mapping Subcommittee (GeMS). In addition, the lab supports and encourages geospatial open standards.

 

Learn more about the MRCTR GIS lab

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                      - Mapping
                      - Labs and Facilities
                      - Research
                      - Planetary Science

View All **