alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 323.15 Report to be filed after strikes. ( a ) Within 15 days following resumption of service after a strike, an air carrier shall file a report with DOT containing a list of all flights that were canceled, the date they were canceled, and the date service was resumed.
( b ) The report shall be marked for the attention of the Director, Office of Aviation Analysis.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3024-0030) [Doc. No. 82, 50 FR 2430, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended by Doc. No. OST-96-1269, 61 FR 19166, May 1, 1996]
#### Sean J. Lewis, Respondent, v Angelo Fidelio et al., Appellants.

[698 NYS2d 169]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered November 5, 1997, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order dated November 5, 1997, must be dismissed. That order was superseded by an order dated January 12, 1998, made upon reargument *(see, Lewis v Fidelio,*266 AD2d 357 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
§ 135.441 Transfer of maintenance records. Each certificate holder who sells a United States registered aircraft shall transfer to the purchaser, at the time of the sale, the following records of that aircraft, in plain language form or in coded form which provides for the preservation and retrieval of information in a manner acceptable to the Administrator: ( a ) The records specified in § 135.439(a)(2).
( b ) The records specified in § 135.439(a)(1) which are not included in the records covered by paragraph (a) of this section, except that the purchaser may allow the seller to keep physical custody of such records. However, custody of records by the seller does not relieve the purchaser of its responsibility under § 135.439(c) to make the records available for inspection by the Administrator or any representative of the National Transportation Safety Board.
ATTACHMENT 1

Toxic Substances Control Action Section 8(e)

15 U.S.C. 2607(e)
From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access

[wais.access.gpo.gov]

[Laws in effect as of January 7, 2003]

TITLE 15--COMMERCE AND TRADE

CHAPTER 53--TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL

SUBCHAPTER I--CONTROL OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES

Sec. 2607. Reporting and retention of information

* * *

(e) Notice to Administrator of substantial risks

 Any person who manufactures, processes, or distributes in commerce as chemical 

substance or mixture and who obtains information which reasonably supports the 

conclusion that such substance or mixture presents a substantial risk of injury to health or 

the environment shall 

immediately inform the Administrator of such information unless such person has actual 

knowledge that the Administrator has been adequately informed of such information.
#### THOMPSON v. BOARD OF COM’RS OF OKMULGEE COUNTY.

No. 28880.

May 21, 1940.

*102 P. 2d 867.*

• W. C. Alley, of Okmulgee, for plaintiff in error.

George R. Inglish and B. F. Moak, both of Okmulgee, and W. E. Foster, of Henryetta, for defendant in error.

HURST, J.

This is a companion case to No. 28879, Federal Tax Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Okmulgee County, 187 Okla. 223, 102 P. 2d 148, decided March 5, 1940. While the petition to vacate the judgment is not identical with that in the cited case, it sets out substantially the same state of facts and course of conduct on the part of the then county attorney of Okmulgee county, and alleges the same defense to the plaintiff’s action. The causes were briefed together. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY and CORN, JJ., concur.
Order entered September 29, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00295-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF: E.B., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-10-03980 U

ORDER

On September 2, 2015, appellee filed a first motion to amend appellee’s brief. This 

motion and any other pending motions filed by appellee are hereby DENIED as moot.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of Sander Metselaar, Appellant, against Leon Spilky, Respondent.

(Submitted September 28, 1936;

decided October 6, 1936.)

*Harry Kwestel*for motion.

*Charles J. Herson*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs.
§ 135.435 Certificate requirements. ( a ) Except for maintenance, preventive maintenance, alterations, and required inspections performed by a certificated repair station that is located outside the United States, each person who is directly in charge of maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations, and each person performing required inspections must hold an appropriate airman certificate.
( b ) For the purpose of this section, a person *directly in charge* is each person assigned to a position in which that person is responsible for the work of a shop or station that performs maintenance, preventive maintenance, alterations, or other functions affecting airworthiness. A person who is *directly in charge* need not physically observe and direct each worker constantly but must be available for consultation and decision on matters requiring instruction or decision from higher authority than that of the person performing the work.
[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-82, 66 FR 41117, Aug. 6, 2001]
99–006 

112TH CONGRESS REPT. 112–32 " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session Part 2 

NSP TERMINATION ACT 

MARCH 14, 2011.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State 

of the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BACHUS, from the Committee on Financial Services, 

submitted the following 

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 

[To accompany H.R. 861] 

REASON FOR SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

This supplemental report shows the updated information for the 

Committee Consideration of H.R. 861, as reported, (H. Rept. 111– 

32): 

COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

The Committee on Financial Services met in open session on 

March 9, 2011 and ordered H.R. 861, the NSP Termination Act, as 

amended, favorably reported to the House by a recorded vote of 31 

yeas and 24 nays, (Record vote No. FC–15). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with HEARING
EXHIBIT 32.1

CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Contango Oil & Gas Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 31, 2010 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kenneth R. Peak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 9, 2011



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ KENNETH R. PEAK                                 
|Kenneth R. Peak Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
§ 29.485 Lateral drift landing conditions. ( a ) The rotorcraft is assumed to be in the level landing attitude, with— ( 1 ) Side loads combined with one-half of the maximum ground reactions obtained in the level landing conditions of § 29.479(b)(1); and
( 2 ) The loads obtained under paragraph (a)(1) of this section applied— ( i ) At the ground contact point; or
( ii ) For full-swiveling gear, at the center of the axle.
( b ) The rotorcraft must be designed to withstand, at ground contact— ( 1 ) When only the aft wheels contact the ground, side loads of 0.8 times the vertical reaction acting inward on one side and 0.6 times the vertical reaction acting outward on the other side, all combined with the vertical loads specified in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) When the wheels contact the ground simultaneously— ( i ) For the aft wheels, the side loads specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and
( ii ) For the forward wheels, a side load of 0.8 times the vertical reaction combined with the vertical load specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4365 

To clarify licensure requirements for contractor medical professionals to perform medical disability examinations for the Department of Veterans 

Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2020 

Mr. BOOZMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To clarify licensure requirements for contractor medical professionals to perform medical disability examinations for 

the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4365 IS

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF LICENSURE REQUIRE2 MENTS FOR CONTRACTOR MEDICAL PROFES3 SIONALS TO PERFORM MEDICAL DISABILITY 

4 EXAMINATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF 

5 VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 Subsection (c) of section 504 of the Veterans’ Bene7 fits Improvements Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–275; 38 

8 U.S.C. 5101 note) is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(c) LICENSURE OF CONTRACT HEALTH CARE PRO10 FESSIONALS.— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any law 

12 regarding the licensure of health care professionals, 

13 a health care professional described in paragraph (2) 

14 may conduct an examination pursuant to a contract 

15 entered into under subsection (a) at any location in 

16 any State, the District of Columbia, or a Common17 wealth, territory, or possession of the United States, 

18 so long as the examination is within the scope of the 

19 authorized duties under such contract. 

20 ‘‘(2) HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL DE21 SCRIBED.—A health care professional described in 

22 this paragraph is a physician, physician assistant, 

23 nurse practitioner, audiologist, or psychologist, 

24 who— 

25 ‘‘(A) has a current unrestricted license to 

26 practice the health care profession of the physiVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:57 Aug 12, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4365.IS S4365

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4365 IS

1 cian, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, au2 diologist, or psychologist, as the case may be; 

3 ‘‘(B) is not barred from practicing such 

4 health care profession in any State, the District 

5 of Columbia, or a Commonwealth, territory, or 

6 possession of the United States; and 

7 ‘‘(C) is performing authorized duties for 

8 the Department of Veterans Affairs pursuant to 

9 a contract entered into under subsection (a).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 99.5**

CERTIFICATIONREQUIRED
BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) ANDSECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

Gildan
Activewear Inc. (the Corporation) is filing its annual report on
Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2004 (the Report)
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Glenn J. Chamandy,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
  1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 18, 2005



|/s/ Glenn J. Chamandy                       
|--------------------------------------------
|Name: Glenn J. Chamandy                     
|Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                            



---

CERTIFICATIONREQUIRED
BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) ANDSECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

Gildan
Activewear Inc. (the Corporation) is filing its annual report on
Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2004 (the Report)
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I,
Laurence G. Sellyn, Executive Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 18, 2005



|/s/ Laurence G. Sellyn
|----------------------
|Name:                 
|Title:                
|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the
consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 1999 and
1998.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          42,786                  34,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,526                   9,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,522                     636
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,636                  43,277
<PP&E>                                          22,513                   3,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,918                   1,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 534,012                  63,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,447                  11,987
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           224                     164
<OTHER-SE>                                     397,567                  50,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   534,012                  63,108
<SALES>                                         90,011                  20,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,011                  20,866
<CGS>                                           65,963                  16,149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,114                  30,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68                     310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (40,041)                (25,157)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (39,062)                (25,157)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.96)                  (2.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.96)                  (2.48)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Annual Report of Lil Marc, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended December 31,
2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joseph P. Wynne, principal financial officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   I have reviewed the Report;

      (2)   Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue
            statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by the Report; and

      (3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
            information included in the Report fairly present, in all material
            respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash
            flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the
            Report.

September 30, 2002


                                           /s/ Joseph P. Wynne
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Joseph P. Wynne
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
§ 29.653 Pressure venting and drainage of rotor blades. ( a ) For each rotor blade— ( 1 ) There must be means for venting the internal pressure of the blade;
( 2 ) Drainage holes must be provided for the blade; and
( 3 ) The blade must be designed to prevent water from becoming trapped in it.
( b ) Paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section does not apply to sealed rotor blades capable of withstanding the maximum pressure differentials expected in service.
[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2396

MARY LAMAR, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, 

 Respondent. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals. 

Submitted: August 19, 2009 Decided: August 31, 2009 

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Glen D. Wasserstein, IMMIGRATION LAW GROUP, PC, Washington, 

D.C., for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant 

Attorney General, Michelle Gorden LaTour, Assistant Director, 

Timothy G. Hayes, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Mary Lamar, a native and citizen of Trinidad and 

Tobago, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals reversing the Immigration Judge’s decision and denying 

cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b) (2006). We 

have reviewed the administrative record and the arguments Lamar 

raises in her petition and conclude that we are without 

jurisdiction to review the Board’s determination. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (D) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 

479-80 (4th Cir. 2006); Obioha v. Gonzales, 431 F.3d 400, 405 

(4th Cir. 2005). We accordingly dismiss the petition for 

review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

PETITION DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1


**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**


**RULE 13a-14(1) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,**


**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In connection with the quarterly report of House of Brussels Chocolate Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant Petersen, Chief Executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Date:
December 15, 2004By:
/s/ Grant PetersenGrant PetersenChief Executive Officer




|
|
|
|

|
|
#### PILLOW v STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 90-7-AM (Lower Court Case Nos. 90-10644TT-42-L and 90-1161-MM-42-L)

Fifth Judicial Circuit, Lake County

April 1, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Michelle T. Morley, Esquire, for appellant.

James F. Feuerstein, Assistant State Attorney, for appellee.

Before McNEAL, BOOTH, SINGELTARY, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The officer stopped Teresa L. Pillow for having a cracked tail light lens, discovered her driver’s license was suspended, and searched her vehicle, finding drug paraphernalia. This situation presents a *Kehoe*question. Was the warrantless stop of the vehicle one which a reason*53able officer would have made absent the additional invalid purpose? *See Kehoe v State,*521 So.2d 1094, 1097 (Fla. 1988). The officer testified that he “typically responded in the same manner” to defective equipment similar to a tail light. There is nothing in the record that refutes the officer’s statement. *See State v Gibson,*560 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (“normal practice” to stop cars with loud mufflers).

AFFIRMED. McNEAL, R., BOOTH, J., SINGELTARY, G., concur.