alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Lawrence  A.  Consalvi,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Gateway  International
Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d))  and that  information  contained  in this  Quarterly
Report on Form  10-QSB for the  fiscal  quarter  ended  March 31,  2004,  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Gateway International Holdings, Inc.



By: /s/ Lawrence A. Consalvi
     -----------------------------
Name:  Lawrence A. Consalvi
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date:  October 5, 2005


                                       57
POWER OF ATTORNEY
                         JAMES R. BOYACK


      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, James
R.  Boyack, hereby constitutes and appoints N. Edward  Berg,  his
true  ad lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name,
place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Form  10-
KSB of Micro Interconnect Technology, Inc., a Nevada corporation,
for  the  fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, and any amendments
or  supplements thereto, and to file this Power of  Attorney  and
the Form 10-K, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents  in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and  the NASD, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full
power  and  authority  to  do  and  perform  each  requisite  and
necessary act to be done in and about the premises, as  fully  to
all  intents  and  purposes as he might or could  do  in  person,
hereby  ratifying  and confirming all that said  attorney-in-fact
and agent, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     Dated this 27th day of March, 2000.

     Signature:


     /s/ James R. Boyack
     ___________________________
     James R. Boyack
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.195 Requirement for filing printed material. ( a ) Any tariff, or revision thereto, filed in paper format which accompanies, governs, or otherwise affects, a tariff filed electronically, must be received by the Department on the same date that a tariff or revision thereto, is filed electronically with the Department under § 221.190(b). Further, such paper tariff, or revision thereto, shall be filed in accordance with the requirements of subparts A through Q of part 221. No tariff or revision thereto, filed electronically under this subpart, shall contain an effective date which is at variance with the effective date of the supporting paper tariff, except as authorized by the Department.
( b ) Any printed justifications, or other information accompanying a tariff, or revision thereto, filed electronically under this subpart, must be received by the Department on the same date as any tariff, or revision thereto, filed electronically.
( c ) If a filer submits a filing which fails to comply with paragraph (a) of this section, or if the filer fails to submit the information in conformity with paragraph (b) of this section, the filing will be subject to rejection, denial, or disapproval, as applicable.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5


<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 1st Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                        (3,675)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  7,725
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                               4,200
<OTHER-SE>                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           3,675
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       3,675
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      (3,675)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                          (3,675)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          (3,675)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.00)




</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.208 Petitions for oral presentation or judge's decision. ( a ) Any person may file a petition for oral evidentiary hearing, oral argument, an initial or recommended decision, or any combination of these. Petitions shall demonstrate that one or more of the criteria set forth in § 302.207 are applicable to the issues for which an oral presentation or judge's decision is requested. Such petitions shall be supported by a detailed explanation of the following: ( 1 ) Why the evidence or argument to be presented cannot be submitted in the form of written evidence or briefs;
( 2 ) Which issues should be examined by an administrative law judge and why such issues should not be presented directly to the DOT decisionmaker for decision;
( 3 ) An estimate of the time required for the oral presentation and the number of witnesses whom the petitioner would present; and
( 4 ) If cross-examination of any witness is desired, the name of the witness, if known, the subject matter of the desired cross-examination or the title or number of the exhibit to be cross-examined, what the petitioner expects to establish by the cross-examination, and an estimate of the time needed for it.
( b ) Petitions for an oral hearing, oral argument, or an administrative law judge's decision shall be filed no later than the due date for answers in proceedings governed by §§ 302.211, 302.212 and 302.213, and be accompanied with the information specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. Filing of the information required in paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4) of this section may be deferred until the DOT decisionmaker has decided to hold a formal proceeding.
( c ) Where a stipulation of disputed facts would eliminate the need for an oral presentation or an administrative law judge's decision, parties shall include in their petitions an offer to withdraw the request should the stipulation be made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,679,000
<SECURITIES>                                   191,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  34,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,964,000
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,440,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,463,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,699,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,722,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,440,000
<SALES>                                        167,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               208,000
<CGS>                                          1,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               227,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                16,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the Quarterly Report  of  Allstates
WorldCargo, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending  March 31, 2007 as  filed  with  the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I,  Craig  D.  Stratton,
Chief Financial  Officer  of  the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
         company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
         operations of the Company for the periods presented.


May 15, 2007

/s/ Craig D. Stratton
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer



This  certification  has been furnished solely  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### § 38.5 Exemptions.

A petition for exemption from any requirement of this part must be submitted to the Administrator in accordance with and meet the requirements of part 11 of this chapter. The FAA will consult with the EPA on each exemption petition before taking action.
#### KADE v BISIO

Case No. 90-010AP

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County

June 28, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Paul M. Kade, Esquire, for appellant.

Carl Di Bernardo, Esquire, for appellee.

Before KAHN, GREEN, B. SHAPIRO, JJ.

*85OPINION OF THE COURT

B. SHAPIRO, J.

Appellee, Defendant below, was personally served with Appellant’s Statement of Claim and Notice of Pretrial Conference on June 19, 1990 and subsequently failed to appear for said Pretrial Conference resulting in entry of a Default Final Judgment on July 6, 1990. Upon service of the Writ of Garnishment, Appellee, by letter to the Court denied having received any notice of the proceedings.

On October 10, 1990 an evidentiary hearing was held before Judge Swanko who in his Order of October 12, 1990 found good and sufficient service upon Appellee to allow the Court to obtain *in personam*jurisdiction over her. Appellee was afforded 30 days to notice a new hearing to vacate the Default Final Judgment on grounds other than defective service of process. There was no Motion for Rehearing or appeal from Judge Swanko’s October 12th Order.

On November 8, 1990 Appellee filed a new Motion to Vacate Final Judgment without supporting affidavits and devoid of any legal excuse for her failure to appear at the pretrial hearing. Subsequent to a December 14, 1990 hearing Judge Roger A. Silver entered his Order of December 26, 1990 wherein he withheld ruling pending a rehearing on the issue of service of process.

It is well established that after the appeal time has passed, a successor Judge may not review and reverse the final orders and decrees of his predecessor. *Groover v Walker,*88 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1956). Judge Silver is therefore precluded from rehearing the issue of service of process. Additionally, in that the new Motion was defective as described above it must be denied.

Accordingly, the Order of December 26, 1990 is reversed and this cause remanded to the lower Court with direction to deny the second Motion to Vacate Default Final Judgment with prejudice.

Reversed and Remanded.

Kahn and Green, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 99.3


                        Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors of
The Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

We have examined management's assertion that, as of December 31, 2000, The Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of internal control over
servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables, included in the
accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over Servicing of Securitized
Automobile Financing Receivables. Management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over such functions. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
obtaining an understanding of the internal control over servicing of securitized
automobile financing receivables, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of the internal control, and such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the internal control may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that, as of December 31, 2000, The Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of internal control over
servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables, is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based upon the criteria for effective internal control
described in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
March 26, 2001
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-255-000]

Take notice that on April 27, 2000, Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C. (Petal), tendered for filing a Request for Waiver of the Internet/interactive web site requirements of the Commission's Order No. 587-I.

Petal states that it is a small company with only two active customers and relatively low volumes. Petal further states that it maintains an electronic bulletin board (EBB) for informational postings and that none of its customers have requested an interactive web site. Petal furthers states that it will agree to implement an interactive  web site if its customers request it or its business changes significantly in the future.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before May 9, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public  inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at  http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11360  Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 88 (Friday, May 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26275-26276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11299]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

May 1, 2000.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 5, 2000 to 
be assured of consideration.

U.S. Customs Service (CUS)

    OMB Number: 1515-0157.
    Form Number: None.

[[Page 26276]]

    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Exportation of Self-Propelled Vehicles.
    Description: The Exportation of Self-Propelled Vehicles requires 
the submission of documents verifying vehicle ownership of exporters 
for exportation of vehicles in the United States.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Individuals or 
households, Not-for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 600,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 10 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 100,000 hours.

    OMB Number: 1515-0189.
    Form Number: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Petroleum Refineries in Foreign Trade Subzones.
    Description: This recordkeeping requirement provides special 
procedures for Petroleum Refineries in foreign Trade Subzones and 
requirements governing the operations of crude petroleum and refineries 
approved as foreign trade zones.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 18.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Recordkeeper: 732 hours.
    Estimated Total Recordkeeping Burden: 13,176 hours.
Clearance Officer: J. Edgar Nichols (202) 927-1426, U.S. Customs 
Service, Printing and Records Management Branch, Ronald Reagan 
Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 3.2.C, Washington, DC 
20229.
OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-11299 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Edward F. Mehm, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation(the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Not applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date:November  10, 2005 By:    /s/ Edward F. Mehm           Edward F. Mehm  *Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)*
29