alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard W.
Edwards, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Richard W. Edwards
--------------------------
Richard W. Edwards
Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2004

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request


                                     - 46 -
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Virtual Crypto Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2018 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Gadi Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/
    Gadi Levin          | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Gadi
    Levin              | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer | 



Dated:
May 21, 2018



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan

– July 2015

Appendix B Page 1 APPENDIX B
Detailed Site Information Detailed information for air monitoring locations are included in site reports. For information on monitoring objectives, purposes and scales, please refer to the main text of this plan.

 Anaheim

 Anaheim Route 5 Near Ro ad 2

 ATSF (Exide)

 Azusa

 Banning Airport

 Big Bear

 Burbank 1

 Closet World (Quemetco)

 Compton

 Costa Mesa

 Crestline

 Fontana

 Glendora

 Indio

 La Habra

 Lake Elsinore

 LAX Hastings

 Long Beach (Hudson)

 Long Beach Route 710 Near Road 2

 Long Beach North

 Long Beach South

 Los Angeles (Main Street)

 Mira Loma (Van Buren)

 Mission Viejo

 Norco

 Ontario Fire Station 1

 Ontario Etiwanda Near Road 2

 Ontario Route 60 Near Road 2

 Palm Springs

 Pasadena

 Perris

 Pico Rivera #2

 Pomona

 Redlands

 Rehrig (Exide)

 Reseda

 Riv erside (Magnolia) 1

 Rubidoux

 San Bernardino

 Santa Clarita

 Saul Martinez Elementary 2

 SA Recycling 2

 Temecula

 Uddelholm (Trojan Battery)

 Upland

 West Los Angeles

1 Site terminated in 2014

2 New in 2014

### Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan

– July 2015

Appendix B Page 2 Table 26 Selected POC, Parameter and Method Codes 1

1 Sampler and monitor locations along with specific method codes are identified in the detailed site plan s, Appendix B Instrument Pollutant POC Code Method
Code Parameter Code

910 NATTS VOCs 4 172 43218, 43372, 43505, 43551, 43552, 43802, 43803, 43804, 43815, 43817, 43824, 43829, 43843, 43860, 45109, 45201, 45202, 45203, 45204, 45220, 45805, 45807.

910 PAMS VOCs 2, 7, 2, or 8 126 43000, 43102, 43202, 43203, 43204, 43205, 43206, 43212, 43214, 43216, 43217, 43220, 43221, 43224, 43226, 43227, 43230, 43231, 43232, 43233, 43235, 43238, 43242, 43243, 43244, 43245, 43247, 43248, 43249, 43250, 43252, 43253, 43261, 43262, 43263,
4 3280, 43284, 43285, 43291, 43954, 43960, 45109, 45201, 45202, 45203, 45204, 45207, 45208, 45209, 45210, 45211, 45212, 45213, 45218, 45219, 45220, 45225.

ATEC 8000 PAMS Carbonyls 2 or 8 102 43502, 43503.

GMW 1200 PM10 1,2,4, or 6 063 and
102 81102, 851 01, 82203, 82308, 82403.

Anderson RAAS PM2.5 Particulate 1 or 2 780 68108, 68107, 68106, 68105, 68104, 68103, 68101, 68109, 68102

Anderson RAAS PM2.5 Particulate 1 or 2 120 88101

Met One SASS Speciated PM2.5 11 or 12 812 88301, 88306, 88302, 88 403.

Met One SASS Speciated PM2.5 11 or 12 810 68108, 68107, 68106, 68105, 68104, 68103, 88502.

Met One SASS Speciated PM2.5 11 or 12 780 68101, 68109, 68102.

Met One SASS Speciated PM2.5 11 or 12 811 88102, 88103, 88107, 88110, 88111, 88118, 88115, 881 12, 88113, 88114, 88126,88128, 88132, 88134, 88136, 88152, 88180, 88176, 88154, 88165, 88168, 88169, 88160, 88161, 88179, 88164, 88183, 88167.

Met One SASS Speciated PM2.5 11 or 12 816 88380, 88383, 88384, 88385, 88370, 88374, 88375, 88376, 88377.

Xontec h 924 CR6 4 or 5 920 12115

Xontech 924 Carbonyls 4 102 43502, 43503.

Xontech 924 Metals 2 or 4 110 85102, 85103, 85105, 85110, 85128, 85132, 85136.
#### § 323.18 Carriers' obligations when terminating, suspending, or reducing air service.

Any air carrier that terminates, suspends, or reduces air service, whether or not subject to the notice requirements of this part, shall make reasonable efforts to contact all passengers holding reservations on the affected flights to inform them of the flights' cancellation.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4379 

To extend the period of the temporary authority to extend contracts and 

leases under the ARMS Initiative. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2020 

Ms. ERNST introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To extend the period of the temporary authority to extend 

contracts and leases under the ARMS Initiative. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PERIOD OF TEMPORARY AU4 THORITY TO EXTEND CONTRACTS AND 

5 LEASES UNDER THE ARMS INITIATIVE. 

6 Section 343 of the National Defense Authorization 

7 Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (10 U.S.C. 7554 note) is amend8 ed by striking ‘‘the date that is five years after the date 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4379 IS

1 of the enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘November 

2 25, 2025,’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.201 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart sets forth the specific rules applicable to proceedings on: ( 1 ) U.S. air carrier certificates of public convenience and necessity and U.S. all-cargo air service certificates under Chapter 411 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, including renewals, amendments, modifications, suspensions and transfers of such certificates.
( 2 ) Foreign air carrier permits under Chapter 413 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII , including renewals, amendments, modifications, suspensions, and transfers of such permits.
( b ) Except as modified by this subpart, the provisions of subpart A of this part apply.
#### § 31.45 Fuel cells.

If fuel cells are used, the fuel cells, their attachments, and related supporting structure must be shown by tests to be capable of withstanding, without detrimental distortion or failure, any inertia loads to which the installation may be subjected, including the drop tests prescribed in § 31.27(c). In the tests, the fuel cells must be loaded to the weight and pressure equivalent to the full fuel quantity condition.

[Amdt. 31-3, 41 FR 55474, Dec. 20, 1976]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 8:30 a.m. on Wednesday, May 10, 2000, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in closed session, pursuant to sections 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of title 5, United States Code, to consider matters relating to the Corporation's corporate, resolution, and supervisory activities.

The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550—17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

Dated: May 5, 2000.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11669 Filed 5-5-00; 1:20 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
#### [556] In the matter of the opening of Livingston Street, in the city of Brooklyn.

On a motion for confirmation of the report of *commissioners of estimate and assessment*of the city of Brooklyn, the court will not review the decision of the corporation in fixing the *district of assessment.*Whether such decision may not he reviewed i>y certiorari, quere.

A motion was made for the confirmation of the report of the commissioners of estimate and assessment in this case, which was opposed on the ground that the *district of assessment*was not co-extensive with the proposed improvement. There were other questions discussed, which are not deemed material to notice. In respect to the assessment district, the following opinion was delivered:

*By the Court,*

Bronson, J.

[557] It may well be doubted whether the court can in this form review the proceedings of the corporation in fixing the district of assessment. By the first section of the act of 1833, the corporation, “ to the end that the persons who will be assessed may be the better ascertained,” before giving notice of an application to open any street, is required to “ determine and fix the limit or district in which the assessment shall be made, or beyond which the same shall not extend; and a description of such limit, or district shall be published with such notice, and .form a part thereof.” The notice is given for the purpose of enabling all persons who may be interested, to remonstrate against the proposed improvement. If the district was either too large or too small, any person who might think himself aggrieved should have appeared before the common council and made the objection; and the corporation would then have decided whether the district should be altered, or whether the proposed improvement ought to be abandoned. Their decision upon that matter might probably be reviewed by *certiorari;*but it is not necessary to pass upon that question in the present case. On this motion, it is sufficient to say, that the commissioners in making the assessment, could not go beyond the prescribed district; and this court, in reviewing their proceedings, cannot go into matters of which they could not have taken cognizance. (13 *Wendell,*664.)
----

|   | Affiliate and Programmer hereby agree to extend the Term of the Agreement as set forth in Paragraph 6.(a) through the earlier of the parties entering into a replacement agreement or April 14, 2010. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.  |                         | SPICE HOT ENTERTAINMENT, INC. |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                    |                         |                          |
|                                    |                         |                          |
| /s/ Roy Liebrecht                       |                         | /s/ Roy Liebrecht             |
| By:                                     | Roy J. Liebrecht             |                          | By: | Roy J. Liebrecht |
| Title:                                  | Vice President               |                          | Title:  | Vice President |
|                                    | Business & Legal Affairs |                          |   | Business & Legal Affairs |

|   | ACCEPTED AND AGREED: |
|--------|----------------------|

|   | DIRECTV, INC. |
|--------|---------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Toby Berlin                          |   |      |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|-----------|
|   | Title: | Toby Berlin                              |   |      |
|   |   | Vice President, Programming Acquisitions |   | MSO #7975 |

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.414 Prehearing conference.

A prehearing conference may be held in an enforcement proceeding whenever the administrative law judge believes that the fair and expeditious disposition of the proceeding requires one. If a prehearing conference is held, it shall be conducted in accordance with § 302.22.
#### JOHNSON v. THOMPSON.

(Decided February 3, 1916.)

Appeal from Madison Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. R. C. Brickell.

No counsel marked for appellant. Betts & Betts, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
LEONARD BROWN

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 0195

Opinion filed May 15, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

John Knowles, Assistant Public Defender, Pensacola , for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charles R. McCoy, Senior Assistan t Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is treated as a petition for writ of certiorari,

and is denied. See, e.g.

, Donaldson v. State , 895 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

WOLF, ROWE, and SWAN SON, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 27.674 Interconnected controls.

Each primary flight control system must provide for safe flight and landing and operate independently after a malfunction, failure, or jam of any auxiliary interconnected control.

[Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 8001, Mar. 6, 1990]
#### § 29.1395 Maximum intensities in overlapping beams of forward and rear position lights.

No position light intensity may exceed the applicable values in the following table, except as provided in [§ 29.1389(b)(3)](/on/2024-09-19/title-14/section-29.1389#p-29.1389(b)(3)).

| Overlaps | Maximum intensity | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Area A (candles) | Area B (candles) |
| Green in dihedral angle *L* | 10 | 1 |
| Red in dihedral angle *R* | 10 | 1 |
| Green in dihedral angle *A* | 5 | 1 |
| Red in dihedral angle *A* | 5 | 1 |
| Rear white in dihedral angle *L* | 5 | 1 |
| Rear white in dihedral angle *R* | 5 | 1 |

Where—

(a) Area A includes all directions in the adjacent dihedral angle that pass through the light source and intersect the common boundary plane at more than 10 degrees but less than 20 degrees; and

(b) Area B includes all directions in the adjacent dihedral angle that pass through the light source and intersect the common boundary plane at more than 20 degrees.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Biotherapeutics,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Security and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Daniel O. Wilds, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.



                                                         /s/ Daniel O. Wilds
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Daniel O. Wilds
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         August 14, 2002
#### D. A. Schulte, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Loft, Inc., Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

(Submitted October 5, 1936;

decided October 13, 1936.)

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 271 N. Y. 420.)
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 12, 2014

No. 04-14-00646-CR

Sonny James HERNANDEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-07-00115-CRF

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The court reporter responsible for preparing the final portion of the reporter’s record has 

filed a notification of late record stating that the record has not been filed because appellant has

failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record and 

appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten 

(10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements 

have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the 

reporter’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due 

within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and the court will consider only those issues or 

points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Sophie Haykl, an Infant, by Louis Witaszek, Her Guardian at Litem, Appellant, *v.*Charles Drees et al., Defendants, and Granger and Company, Respondent.

(Submitted October 19, 1936;

decided October 20, 1936.)

*Roy P. Ohlin*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, unless undertaking on appeal is filed within ten days, in which event the motion is denied.
#### Dora Kaufman, Appellant, *v.*Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

(Submitted September 28, 1936;

decided October 6, 1936.)

*Harry A. Gottlieb*for motion.

*Dean Potter*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements, on ground that the order is not a final order.
#### WYLAR, ACKARLAND & COMPANY v. CENTRAL ALABAMA DRY GOODS CO.

(Decided April 6, 1916.)

Appeal from Washington Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Ben G. Turner.

Granade & Granade, for appellant. William D. Dunn, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.-
§ 325.11 Form of documents. All documents filed under this part shall be filed in the Documentary Services Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, D.C. 20590, and on their front page state: ( a ) The title of the document;
( b ) The name of the affected community;
( c ) The name, address, and telephone number of a person who can be contacted for further information concerning the subject of the document; and
( d ) In the case of a responsive document, the docket number of the document to which it responds.