alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY
 Certification Required by Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the
Company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ KENNETH R. PEAK
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4257 

To repeal the temporary exemption to the certification requirement under 

section 5323 of title 49, United States Code, for contracts between 

public transportation agencies and rolling stock manufacturers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2020 

Ms. MCSALLY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the temporary exemption to the certification requirement under section 5323 of title 49, United States 

Code, for contracts between public transportation agencies and rolling stock manufacturers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Our Transit 

5 Systems from Chinese Interference Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4257 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CERTAIN ROLLING STOCK PRO2 CUREMENTS. 

3 Section 5323(u)(5) of title 49, United States Code, 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(A) PARTIES TO EXECUTED

6 CONTRACTS.—’’; and 

7 (2) by striking subparagraphs (B) and (C). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 3.1 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies to any person who makes a record regarding: ( 1 ) A type-certificated product, or
( 2 ) A product, part, appliance or material that may be used on a type-certificated product.
( b ) Section 3.5(b) does not apply to records made under part 43 of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,730
<INVENTORY>                                      1,221
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,207
<PP&E>                                          38,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 449,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,115
<BONDS>                                        227,831
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   449,616
<SALES>                                         43,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               290,605
<CGS>                                           39,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,567)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,567)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,567)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.16)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property along Jamaica Bay, in the Borough of Brooklyn. Warren Leslie et al., Appellants.

(Argued October 15, 1936;

decided November 24, 1936.)

*181
      *John W. Davis, Daniel J. Kenefick*and *Luke W. Finlay*for Warren Leslie et al, appellants.

*182
      *Francis S. Bensel, David Barnett and W. Frederick IKnecht*for Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company et al., appellants.

*183
      *Per Curiam.*

A single question of power in the Supreme Court is involved in the certified question.

Upon this record we find no abuse (as matter of law) of the discretionary power of the Supreme Court. *(Hatch*v. *Central Nat. Bank,*78 N. Y. 487, 489; *Matter of Tilden,*98 N. Y. 434, 439; *Ladd*v. *Stevenson,*112 N. Y. 325.) This leads to an affirmance.

We leave the merits to be determined upon the new trial which has been granted.

The order should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Pinch, JJ., concur; Crane, Ch. J., taldng no part.

Order affirmed, etc.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4293 

To promote airline passenger safety during the COVID–19 public health 

emergency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2020 

Mr. MERKLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To promote airline passenger safety during the COVID– 

19 public health emergency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maintaining Important 

5 Distance During Lengthy Epidemics Act of 2020’’ or the 

6 ‘‘MIDDLE Act of 2020’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROMOTING AIRLINE PASSENGER SAFETY DURING 

8 THE COVID–19 PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to the Rehabilitation 

10 Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 701 et seq.), the Americans with 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4293 IS

1 Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.), and 

2 section 41705 of title 49, United States Code (commonly 

3 referred to as the ‘‘Air Carrier Access Act’’), during the 

4 period beginning on the date that is 14 days after the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act and ending on the last day 

6 of the emergency period described in section 

7 1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1320b–5(g)(1)(B)), an air carrier (as defined in section 

9 40102 of title 49, United States Code) shall be prohibited 

10 from doing any of the following: 

11 (1) Permit adjacent seats to be filled on a pas12 senger aircraft. 

13 (2) Pass along the cost of any seat switch un14 dertaken by an air carrier in order to comply the 

15 prohibition under paragraph (1). 

16 (3) Permit a passenger or crewmember to board 

17 a passenger aircraft if the passenger or crewmember 

18 is not wearing a mask. 

19 (b) EXCEPTIONS.—Not later than 14 days after the 

20 date of the enactment of this Act, taking into account any 

21 Federal health guidance from the Department of Health 

22 and Human Services (including guidance related to the 

23 COVID–19 public health emergency), the Administrator 

24 of the Federal Aviation Administration shall, in consulta25 tion with the Secretary of Health and Human Services 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4293 IS

1 (acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease 

2 Control and Prevention), issue guidance that provides for 

3 appropriate exceptions to the prohibitions under para4 graphs (1) and (3) of subsection (a). 

5 (c) NONDISCRIMINATION.—In carrying out the provi6 sions of this section, an air carrier may not discriminate 

7 against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, 

8 genetic information, national origin, age, disability, or sex 

9 (including sexual orientation and gender identity). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Element 21 Golf Company (formerly BRL
      Holdings, Inc.) (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof, we, Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer,
      and John Grippo, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.




Date:
                November 20, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D.President
                and DirectorDate:
                November 20, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                John GrippoChief
                Financial Officer
#### TIDWELL v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 8, 1916.)

Appeal from Covington Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. B. Foster.

Baldwin & Murphy, for appellant. W .L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed by agreement.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOSE ENRIQUE GONZALEZ, )

DOC #C11749, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3167

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 6, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Terrence E. Kehoe, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

BADALAMENTI, Judge.

Jose Enrique Gonzalez appeals his jury convictions and concurrent life 

sentences for first-degree murder and sexual battery with actual physical force likely to 

cause serious personal injury. Gonzalez argues that the July 11, 2018, amended 
- 2 -

judgment does not indicate that Gonzalez was found guilty by a jury. The State 

concedes this scrivener's error.1 Accordingly, we remand with directions that the trial 

court correct the scrivener's error contained in the amended judgment to reflect that 

Gonzalez was found guilty by a jury. See Newson v. State, 867 So. 2d 603, 603 (Fla. 

2d DCA 2004) (affirming judgment and sentence but remanding with directions that an 

error in the judgment be corrected where the error was "not the result of a judicial 

determination, but rather a scrivener's error in the preparation of the written document"); 

Taylor v. State, 242 So. 3d 1203, 1204 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) ("We also remand for the 

trial court to correct the scrivener's error in the judgment, which failed to indicate that 

Taylor was tried by a jury and found guilty."). We affirm Gonzalez's jury convictions and 

concurrent life sentences in all other respects.

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error.

KHOUZAM, J., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur. 

1While this appeal was pending, Gonzalez filed a motion to correct 

sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). The trial court 

granted that motion and ordered that the judgment be amended to comport with the 

court's oral pronouncement. That amended judgment, however, neglects to indicate 

that Gonzalez was convicted after a jury trial.
Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:3836-2   Filed:08/30/18   Entered:08/30/18 18:31:47    Desc:Exhibit Evidence of admission in New York   Page 1 of 1
§ 27.1353 Energy storage systems. Energy storage systems must be designed and installed as follows: ( a ) Energy storage systems must provide automatic protective features for any conditions that could prevent continued safe flight and landing.
( b ) Energy storage systems must not emit any flammable, explosive, or toxic gases, smoke, or fluids that could accumulate in hazardous quantities within the rotorcraft.
( c ) Corrosive fluids or gases that escape from the system must not damage surrounding structures, adjacent equipment, or systems necessary for continued safe flight and landing.
( d ) The maximum amount of heat and pressure that can be generated during any operation or under any failure condition of the energy storage system or its individual components must not result in any hazardous effect on rotorcraft structure, equipment, or systems necessary for continued safe flight and landing.
( e ) Energy storage system installations required for continued safe flight and landing of the rotorcraft must have monitoring features and a means to indicate to the pilot the status of all critical system parameters.
[Amdt. 27-51, 88 FR 8738, Feb. 10, 2023]
<PAGE>   1

                                  Exhibit 21.1

                              List of Subsidiaries


Breaking Technology & Equipment, Inc.
CPI Concrete Products, Inc.
Cranequip Inc.
Cranequip Ltd.
Dura-Wood, LLC
Gantrex Corporation
Gantrex Limited
Hovey Industries Ltd.
HSQ Technology Corporation
L. K. Comstock & Company, Inc.
Midwest Construction Services, Inc.
M-Track Enterprises, Inc.
National Rail Contractors, Inc.
Neosho Central America, Inc.
Neosho Construction Company, Inc.
Pacific Northern Rail Contractors Inc.
PNR Leasing Ltd.
RailWorks of Canada Company
RailWorks Canada, Inc.
RailWorks Construction, Inc.
Railworks Rail Products & Services, Inc.
Railworks Rail Services of Canada Ltd.
RailWorks Track Services, Inc.
RailWorks Track Systems, Inc.
RWKS Transit, Inc.
RailWorks Transit Systems, Inc.
RailWorks Wood Products, Inc.
RailWorks W. T. Byler, LP
U. S. Railway Supply, Inc.
Wood Waste Energy, Inc.


                                       66
§ 29.737 Skis. ( a ) The maximum limit load rating of each ski must equal or exceed the maximum limit load determined under the applicable ground load requirements of this part.
( b ) There must be a stabilizing means to maintain the ski in an appropriate position during flight. This means must have enough strength to withstand the maximum aerodynamic and inertia loads on the ski.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000323 31-JAN-2020 01:51 PM
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Daniel O. Wilds, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                                                                                                      
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Daniel O.
Wilds                                                                                  
| |  | Daniel O. Wilds
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
November 14, 2002

23
# Az Európai Unió C 68A/2011

| | ISSN 1725-518X
  doi:10.3000/1725518X.CA2011.068.hun |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 68A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 54. évfolyam2011. március 3. |

ISSN 1725-518X

doi:10.3000/1725518X.CA2011.068.hun

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 68A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

54. évfolyam2011. március 3.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Helyesbítések |
| 2011/C 068A/01 | Helyesbítés az EPSO/AST/112/10 nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – Asszisztensek (AST 3) (HL C 341 A., 2010.12.16.) | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

Helyesbítések

2011/C 068A/01

Helyesbítés az EPSO/AST/112/10 nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – Asszisztensek (AST 3) (HL C 341 A., 2010.12.16.)

(HL C 341 A., 2010.12.16.)

1

A HL C A VERSENYVIZSGA ÁTTEKINTÉSE

Itt találja a Hivatalos Lap C A sorozata idei publikációinak listáját.

Ellenkező jelzés híján, a HL-számok valamennyi nyelvi változatban elérhetők.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

Helyesbítések

| 3.3.2011 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 68/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2011

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 68/1

---

Helyesbítés az EPSO/AST/112/10 nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – Asszisztensek (AST 3)

(
  Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 341 A., 2010. december 16.
  )

(2011/C 68 A/01)

A 3. oldalon, a IV.2. részben:

a következő szövegrész:

| „d) teszt | szakmai készségek:


  pontosság és következetesség | pontozás: 0–20 pont


  minimálisan szükséges pontszám: 10 pont |
| --- | --- | --- |
| e) teszt | szakmai készségek:


  szervezőkészség és a feladatok rangsorolásának képessége | pontozás: 0–20 pont


  minimálisan szükséges pontszám: 10 pont” |

„d) teszt

szakmai készségek:

pontosság és következetesség

pontozás: 0–20 pont

minimálisan szükséges pontszám: 10 pont

e) teszt

szakmai készségek:

szervezőkészség és a feladatok rangsorolásának képessége

pontozás: 0–20 pont

minimálisan szükséges pontszám: 10 pont”

helyesen:

| „d) teszt | szakmai készségek:


  pontosság és következetesség | pontozás: 0–20 pont |
| --- | --- | --- |
| e) teszt | szakmai készségek:


  szervezőkészség és a feladatok rangsorolásának képessége | pontozás: 0–20 pont |
| | Minimálisan szükséges pontszám: a d) és az e) teszt összesített pontjaiból 20 pont.” |

„d) teszt

szakmai készségek:

pontosság és következetesség

pontozás: 0–20 pont

e) teszt

szakmai készségek:

szervezőkészség és a feladatok rangsorolásának képessége

pontozás: 0–20 pont

Minimálisan szükséges pontszám: a d) és az e) teszt összesített pontjaiból 20 pont.”

---
#### Bucciarelli v. DiCicco

*Arthur Lefkoe,*for petitioner.

*Robert Truckess,*county controller, for respondent.

January 23, 1958.

Gerber, J:,

Defendant petitioned the court for a remittance of the fees of the members *62of the board of arbitrators heretofore repaid by defendant to the county on appeal by defendant from the award of a board of arbitrators.

Petitioner was defendant in an assumpsit action which was heard by a board of arbitrators in accordance with the Act of June 16,1836, P. L. 715, sec. 8.1, added January 14, 1952, P. L. (1951) 2087, sec. 1, as amended, 5 PS §30, and the rules of court adopted under the authority of said act.

The award of the arbitrators having been for plaintiff, an appeal therefrom was taken by defendant, at which time defendant, in accordance with section 4 of the Arbitration Act, 5 PS §71, repaid to the county the fees of the members of the board of arbitrators. See Montgomery County Rules of Arbitration, rule VIA 3.

The case was settled before the appeal came to trial.

The issue presented by this petition is whether an appellant who has repaid to the county the fees of the board of arbitrators is entitled to have this repayment remitted because the case was settled prior to a jury trial.

The Arbitration Act as amended in section 4 thereof provides:

> “Such fees shall not be taxed as costs or be recoverable in any proceeding.”

The legislature has removed this matter from the discretion of the court. We therefore have no alternative but to dismiss the petition.

This case must be distinguished from the situation covered by our local Rules of Arbitration which provide in rule VIA 3:

> “. . . The Court may, on petition of any party to a case, on cause shown and to prevent injustice or hardship, reduce the amount of this repayment or relieve appellant from such repayment in its entirety.”

The aforesaid rule operates before the repayment is made to the county, not afterwards.

*63And now, January 23, 1958, the petition of defendant for remittance of arbitrator’s fees is hereby dismissed.
#### EDMONDSON, ET AL. v. CLOPTON.

(Decided May 18, 1916.)

Appeal from Morgan Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. R. C. Brickell.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.