alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4057 

To amend the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act 

of 1974 and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 

to provide that the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the 

Interior are not required to reinitiate consultation on a land management 

plan or land use plan under certain circumstances, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2020 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. RISCH, Mr. CRAPO, and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources 

Planning Act of 1974 and the Federal Land Policy and 

Management Act of 1976 to provide that the Secretary 

of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior are 

not required to reinitiate consultation on a land management plan or land use plan under certain circumstances, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4057 IS

1 SECTION 1. NO ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION REQUIRED. 

2 (a) FOREST SERVICE PLANS.—Section 6(d) of the 

3 Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act 

4 of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1604(d)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(3) NO ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION RE7 QUIRED AFTER NEW INFORMATION BECOMES AVAIL8 ABLE.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 

9 the Secretary shall not be required to reinitiate con10 sultation under section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered 

11 Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536(a)(2)) or sec12 tion 402.16 of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations 

13 (or a successor regulation), on a land management 

14 plan approved, amended, or revised under this sec15 tion on the basis of new information relating to a 

16 species listed as threatened or endangered or critical 

17 habitat designated under that Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 

18 et seq.).’’. 

19 (b) BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT PLANS.—Sec20 tion 202 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 

21 of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712) is amended by adding at the 

22 end the following: 

23 ‘‘(g) NO ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION REQUIRED

24 AFTER NEW INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE.—Not25 withstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary 

26 shall not be required to reinitiate consultation under secVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:28 Jul 03, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4057.IS S4057

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4057 IS

1 tion 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 

2 U.S.C. 1536(a)(2)) or section 402.16 of title 50, Code of 

3 Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation), on a land 

4 use plan approved, amended, or revised under this section 

5 on the basis of new information relating to a species listed 

6 as threatened or endangered or critical habitat designated 

7 under that Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1 – President Certification**

 

**SATELLITE NEWSPAPERS CORP.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Satellite Newspapers Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy Piceni, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

By: /s/ Roy Piceni

Roy Piceni, President

 

May 24, 2006

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Satellite Newspapers Corp., and will be retained by Satellite Newspapers Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Dale CLINE, Director of Labor *v.*PLAZA PERSONNEL AGENCY, Inc.

5-5981

481 S.W. 2d 749

Opinion delivered July 3, 1972

*957
      *J. R. Nash*and *John T. Lavey,*for appellant.

*Hale, Hale & Fincher,*for appellee.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellee, Plaza Personnel Agency, applied to the State Director of Labor for a license authorizing Plaza to operate a private employment agency in the state. The Director refused to issue the license. Plaza then brought this action for a writ of mandamus to compel the Director to issue the license. This appeal is from a judgment granting the writ.

. For reversal the Director relies upon the rule that a writ of mandamus will not be issued to require an executive officer to perform a discretionary act. *Hardin*v. *Cassinelli,*204 Ark. 1016, 166 S.W. 2d 258 (1942). Here, however, the Director’s duty is ministerial rather than discretionary. The statute merely requires the applicant to pay a $200 license fee and to make a $1,000 bond to guarantee the applicant’s compliance with the terms of the statute. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1001 (Repl. 1960). The statute contains no language investing the Director with discretionary power to deny the application. It is true, as the Director points out, that he may revoke a license after a hearing at which a violation of the statute is shown; but we fail to see how the authority to revoke a license for cause supplies discretionary power to deny the application in the first instance.

It is also argued that the naked authority to issue a license carries with it, by implication, the power to exercise reasonable discretion in granting or refusing to grant such a permit. The fallacy in that argument lies in its assumption that the licensing officer may decide for himself what is a reasonable basis for rejecting an application. Discretionary power may be delegated by the legislature to the licensing authority, but it is essential that reasonable guidelines be provided in the statute. *Walden*
      *958v. *Hart,*245 Ark. 650, 420 S.W. 2d 868 (1967). Inasmuch as the statute now in question affords no guidance whatever for the licensing authority, we must conclude that no discretion in the matter has been invested in the Director. The circuit court was therefore right in directing that the license be issued.

Affirmed.
§ 145.151 Personnel requirements. Each certificated repair station must— ( a ) Designate a repair station employee as the accountable manager;
( b ) Provide qualified personnel to plan, supervise, perform, and approve for return to service the maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations performed under the repair station certificate and operations specifications;
( c ) Ensure it has a sufficient number of employees with the training or knowledge and experience in the performance of maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations authorized by the repair station certificate and operations specifications to ensure all work is performed in accordance with part 43; and
( d ) Determine the abilities of its noncertificated employees performing maintenance functions based on training, knowledge, experience, or practical tests.
##### 



Exhibit 32(b)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|  
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.

|              |  |                                                                                                
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|June 30, 2005 |  | /s/ John D. Sheehan                                                                            
|              |  |                                                                                                
|              |  | John D. Sheehan
    Acting Chief Financial Officer,
    Chief Accounting Officer and Controller
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  containes  financial  information  extracted  from  Forstmann  &
Company,  Inc.'s condensed financial  statements for the thirty-nine weeks ended
August 2, 1998 and is qualified  in its entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000                            
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Nov-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 May-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-02-1998
<CASH>                                         118
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  47,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,096
<INVENTORY>                                    48,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               95,335
<PP&E>                                         28,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,644
<BONDS>                                        56,726
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       44
<OTHER-SE>                                     46,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,089
<SALES>                                        117,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,638
<CGS>                                          104,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               638
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,858)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,018)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 80
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,938)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.90)
        


</TABLE>
§ 29.1357 Circuit protective devices. ( a ) Automatic protective devices must be used to minimize distress to the electrical system and hazard to the rotorcraft system and hazard to the rotorcraft in the event of wiring faults or serious malfunction of the system or connected equipment.
( b ) The protective and control devices in the generating system must be designed to de-energize and disconnect faulty power sources and power transmission equipment from their associated buses with sufficient rapidity to provide protection from hazardous overvoltage and other malfunctioning.
( c ) Each resettable circuit protective device must be designed so that, when an overload or circuit fault exists, it will open the circuit regardless of the position of the operating control.
( d ) If the ability to reset a circuit breaker or replace a fuse is essential to safety in flight, that circuit breaker or fuse must be located and identified so that it can be readily reset or replaced in flight.
( e ) Each essential load must have individual circuit protection. However, individual protection for each circuit in an essential load system (such as each position light circuit in a system) is not required.
( f ) If fuses are used, there must be spare fuses for use in flight equal to at least 50 percent of the number of fuses of each rating required for complete circuit protection.
( g ) Automatic reset circuit breakers may be used as integral protectors for electrical equipment provided there is circuit protection for the cable supplying power to the equipment.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-24, 49 FR 44440, Nov. 6, 1984]
# National Day of Prayer, 2000

Throughout our Nation's history, Americans have come before God with humble hearts to ask forgiveness, to seek wisdom, and to offer thanksgiving and praise. The framers of our democracy, on a quest for freedom and equality, were fueled by an abiding faith in a just and loving God, to whom they turned often for guidance and strength.

Succeeding generations of Americans, striving to preserve that freedom in the face of challenges posed by enemies abroad or conflict at home, also turned their hearts and minds to God in prayer. Today, whether celebrating the special moments in our lives, searching for strength and meaning in the face of problems or grief, or simply giving thanks for the blessing of a new day, Americans continue to use the powerful medium of prayer.

Now more than ever, Americans treasure our religious freedom, which embraces the many diverse communities of faith that have infused our society and our cultural heritage through more than two centuries. Millions of Americans gratefully sustain the tradition of prayer in churches, synagogues, temples, mosques, and other houses of worship across our country.

And we continue to rely on our faith as a pillar of strength, even in this era of unprecedented peace and prosperity. We pray for the spirit of reconciliation, so that we may overcome the divisions of race, religion, culture, and background that have scarred our society in recent years. We pray for the spirit of compassion so that we will reach out to others who have not shared equally in this world's bounteous blessings—those here at home who struggle for economic and educational opportunity and those around the globe whose lives have been darkened by the shadows of poverty, oppression, natural disaster, or disease. And we must always pray for wisdom—the wisdom to raise children with strong values and loving hearts; the wisdom to live in harmony with our environment and to preserve its health and beauty for the benefit of future generations; and the wisdom to keep America the world's greatest hope for freedom, peace, and human dignity in the 21st century.

The Congress, by Public Law 100-307, has called on our citizens to reaffirm the role of prayer in our society and to honor the religious diversity our freedom permits by recognizing annually a “National Day of Prayer.”

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 4, 2000, as a National Day of Prayer. I encourage the citizens of this great Nation to pray, each in his or her own manner, seeking strength from God to face today's challenges, seeking guidance for tomorrow's uncertainties, and giving thanks for the rich blessings that our country has enjoyed throughout its history.                          ( print page 26482)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fourth.

[FR Doc. 00-11585

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 29.60 Elevated heliport takeoff path: Category A. ( a ) The elevated heliport takeoff path extends from the point of commencement of the takeoff procedure to a point in the takeoff path at which the rotorcraft is 1,000 feet above the takeoff surface and compliance with § 29.67(a)(2) is shown. In addition— ( 1 ) The requirements of § 29.59(a) must be met;
( 2 ) While attaining VTOSS and a positive rate of climb, the rotorcraft may descend below the level of the takeoff surface if, in so doing and when clearing the elevated heliport edge, every part of the rotorcraft clears all obstacles by at least 15 feet;
( 3 ) The vertical magnitude of any descent below the takeoff surface must be determined; and
( 4 ) After attaining VTOSS and a positive rate of climb, the landing gear may be retracted.
( b ) The scheduled takeoff weight must be such that the climb requirements of § 29.67 (a)(1) and (a)(2) will be met.
( c ) Takeoff distance will be determined in accordance with § 29.61.
[Doc. No. 24802, 61 FR 21899, May 10, 1996; 61 FR 33963, July 1, 1996]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

Timothy J. McGrath. Effective November 2002, Mr. McGrath began serving as the
Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Insight North America and,
in the first quarter of 2003, became eligible for incentive compensation, in
place of previous arrangements regarding incentive compensation, for an
incentive bonus of 0.75% of our net earnings provided that our net earnings
exceed stated minimum amounts. Our net earnings exceeded the minimum amounts for
the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
#### PARENTS’ CONFERENCE, AND OLD FOLKS & ORPHANS’ HOME OF ANNISTON v. PARENTS’ CONFERENCE.

(Decided January 11, 1916.)

Appeal from Anniston City Court.

Heard before Hon. Thomas W. Coleman, Jr.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed by agreement.
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arch Chemicals, Inc.,
      a
      Virginia corporation (the “Company”), for the period ending June 30, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of and for the periods presented in the
                Report.




The
      foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the
      provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended
      to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.




Dated:
                August 2, 2006
            
            /s/
                Michael E. CampbellMichael
                E. Campbell
              Chief
                Executive OfficerDated:
                August 2, 2006
            
            /s/
                Louis S. MassimoLouis
                S. Massimo
              Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Arch Chemicals, Inc. and will be retained by Arch Chemicals, Inc. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### Harold Rogers, Appellant, *v.*United New York Sandy Hook Pilots Association et al., Respondents.

(Argued October 19, 1936;

decided November 17, 1936.)

*619
      *Robert E. Whalen*for appellant.

*Thomas A. Shaw, Jay S. Jones*and *Edward J. Fanning*for respondents,

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran .and Finch, JJ.
AAM

- 13

- 121

- E January 16, 2013

Exemption No. 10229 A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 11

- 0228

Mr. Roger Currier

President

Currier’s Flying Service , Inc.

P.O. Box 351

Greenville Junction, ME 04442

Dear Mr. Currier :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 10229 . It

explain the basis our decision and describes its effect , and lists the conditions and limitations

.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated December 10 , 2012

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration

(FAA) on behalf of Currier’s Flying Service , Inc. ( Currier’s Flying Service )

, for an extension

of Exemption No. 10229

. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations (14 CFR) allows Currier’s Flyi ng Service to cover its safety

- sensitive employees

under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Curr ier’s Flying Service

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10229

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the2

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 4011 3 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has

delegated to me, I grant your petition.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Currier’s Flying Service are subject to the drug and alcohol

regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of

the Currier’s Flying Service part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 201 5 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon