26820 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 9, 2000 / Notices

(d) of this clause, and contractors must

comply with the (b) paragraph of this

clause if an engineering change requires

acquisition or modification of STE. In so

complying, the contractor shall identify

the change order which requires the

proposed acquisition, fabrication, or

modification.

(mm) FAR 52.245–19 requires a

contractor to notify the contracting

officer if there is any change in the

condition of property furnished ‘‘as is’’

from the time of inspection until time of

receipt.

(nn) FAR 49.602–2(a)–(e) refers to the

inventory schedule forms, SF’s 1426

through 1434.

This information is used to facilitate

the management of Government

property in the possession of the

contractor.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

Number of Respondents: 27,884.

Responses per Respondent: 488.6.

Total Responses: 13,624,759.

Average Burden Hours Per Response:

.4826.

Total Burden Hours: 6,575,805.

The total burden hours have changed

under this OMB clearance 9000–0075 to

reflect the incorporation of hours

currently associated with OMB

clearance 9000–0151 (FAR Case 1995–

013) which is due to expire in June 2000

and will not be renewed. The OMB

collection burden associated with

Government property nonetheless

remains unchanged.

Obtaining Copies of Proposals

Requester may obtain a copy of the

proposal from the General Services

Administration, FAR Secretariat

(MVRS), Room 4035, 1800 F Street,

NW., Washington, DC 20405, telephone

(202) 208–7312. Please cite OMB

Control No. 9000–0075, Government

Property, in all correspondence.

Dated: May 2, 2000.

Edward C. Loeb,

Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.

[FR Doc. 00–11589 Filed 5–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820–EP–U

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

Meeting of the Chief of Naval

Operations (CNO) Executive Panel

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The CNO Executive Panel is

to conduct the final briefing of the Navy

Energy Strategy Short Study to the Chief

of Naval Operations. This meeting will

consist of discussions relating to

proposed Navy Energy Strategy.

DATE: The meeting will be held on May

31, 2000 from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at

the office of the Chief of Naval

Operations, 2000 Navy Pentagon,

Washington, DC 20350–2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Commander Christopher Agan, CNO

Executive Panel, 4401 Ford Avenue,

Suite 601, Alexandria, Virginia 22302–

0268, (703) 681–6205.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant

to the provisions of the Federal

Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.

2), these matters constitute classified

information that is specifically

authorized by Executive Order to be

kept secret in the interest of national

defense and are, in fact, properly

classified pursuant to such Executive

Order. Accordingly, the Secretary of the

Navy has determined in writing that the

public interest requires that all sessions

of the meeting be closed to the public

because they will be concerned with

matters listed in section 552b(c)(1) of

title 5, United States Code.

Dated: April 27, 2000.

J.L. Roth,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate

General’s Corps, Federal Register Liaison

Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–11506 Filed 5–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Notice of Proposed Information

Collection Requests

AGENCY: Department of Education.

SUMMARY: The Leader, Information

Management Group, Office of the Chief

Information Officer, invites comments

on the proposed information collection

requests as required by the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Interested persons are invited to

submit comments on or before July 10,

2000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires

that the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) provide interested

Federal agencies and the public an early

opportunity to comment on information

collection requests. OMB may amend or

waive the requirement for public

consultation to the extent that public

participation in the approval process

would defeat the purpose of the

information collection, violate State or

Federal law, or substantially interfere

with any agency’s ability to perform its

statutory obligations. The Leader,

Information Management Group, Office

of the Chief Information Officer,

publishes that notice containing

proposed information collection

requests prior to submission of these

requests to OMB. Each proposed

information collection, grouped by

office, contains the following: (1) Type

of review requested, e.g., new, revision,

extension, existing or reinstatement; (2)

Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4)

Description of the need for, and

proposed use of, the information; (5)

Respondents and frequency of

collection; and (6) Reporting and/or

Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites

public comment.

The Department of Education is

especially interested in public comment

addressing the following issues: (1) is

this collection necessary to the proper

functions of the Department; (2) will

this information be processed and used

in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate

of burden accurate; (4) how might the

Department enhance the quality, utility,

and clarity of the information to be

collected; and (5) how might the

Department minimize the burden of this

collection on the respondents, including

through the use of information

technology.

Dated: May 3, 2000.

William Burrow,

Leader, Information Management Group,

Office of the Chief Information Officer.

Office of the Undersecretary

Type of Review: New Collection.

Title: National Evaluation of GEAR

UP.

Frequency: Monthly, Annually,

Weekly.

Affected Public: Businesses or other

for-profit, Not-for-profit institutions,

State, Local, or Tribal Gov’t, SEAs or

LEAs.

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour

Burden:

Responses: 11565

Burden Hours: 3981.

Abstract: The evaluation responds to

the legislative requirement in Pub. L.

105–244, Section G to evaluate and

report on the effectiveness of projects

funded under the Gaining Early

Awareness and Readiness for

Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP)

program. Students’ and parents’

expectations for postsecondary

education, their knowledge of the

academic preparation needed and

availability of financial resources, and

students’ academic performance will be

compared over time for students in