alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Dennis McGuire, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 14, 2007



| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | /s/  DENNISMCGUIRE           
| | Dennis McGuire,              
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| |
EXHIBIT 32.1





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Robert M. Budd, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the periodic report, to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC upon request.







Date:  April 20, 2009

By: /s/ Robert M. Budd

Robert M. Budd

Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.181 Duration. ( a ) Unless sooner surrendered, suspended, revoked, or a termination date is otherwise established by the FAA, airworthiness certificates are effective as follows: ( 1 ) Standard airworthiness certificates, special airworthiness certificates—primary category, and airworthiness certificates issued for restricted or limited category aircraft are effective as long as the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations are performed in accordance with Parts 43 and 91 of this chapter and the aircraft are registered in the United States.
( 2 ) A special flight permit is effective for the period of time specified in the permit.
( 3 ) A special airworthiness certificate in the light-sport category is effective as long as— ( i ) The aircraft meets the definition of a light-sport aircraft;
( ii ) The aircraft conforms to its original configuration, except for those alterations performed in accordance with an applicable consensus standard and authorized by the aircraft's manufacturer or a person acceptable to the FAA;
( iii ) The aircraft has no unsafe condition and is not likely to develop an unsafe condition; and
( iv ) The aircraft is registered in the United States.
( 4 ) An experimental certificate for research and development, showing compliance with regulations, crew training, or market surveys is effective for 1 year after the date of issue or renewal unless the FAA prescribes a shorter period. The duration of an experimental certificate issued for operating amateur-built aircraft, exhibition, air-racing, operating primary kit-built aircraft, or operating light-sport aircraft is unlimited, unless the FAA establishes a specific period for good cause.
( b ) The owner, operator, or bailee of the aircraft must, upon request, make it available for inspection by the FAA.
( c ) Upon suspension, revocation, or termination by order of the FAA of an airworthiness certificate, the owner, operator, or bailee of an aircraft must, upon request, surrender the certificate to the FAA.
[Amdt. 21-21, 33 FR 6858, May 7, 1968, as amended by Amdt. 21-49, 44 FR 46781, Aug. 9, 1979; Amdt. 21-70, 57 FR 41368, Sept. 9, 1992; Amdt. 21-85, 69 FR 44861, July 27, 2004]
Exhibit 24.2


                               KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



     WHEREAS,  KeySpan  Corporation,  a New York  corporation  (the  "Company"),
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K as prescribed by
said Commission  pursuant to said Act and the rules and regulations  promulgated
thereunder.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in my capacity as a director of the Company,  I do hereby
appoint GERALD LUTERMAN, JOHN J. BISHAR, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and each of
them  severally,  as my  attorneys-in-fact  with power to execute in my name and
place, and in my capacity as a director of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any
amendment  to said  Report  and  any  other  documents  required  in  connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney this 10th day of
March, 2004.





                                                     /s/Alan H. Fishman
§ 25.1533 Additional operating limitations. ( a ) Additional operating limitations must be established as follows: ( 1 ) The maximum takeoff weights must be established as the weights at which compliance is shown with the applicable provisions of this part (including the takeoff climb provisions of § 25.121(a) through (c), for altitudes and ambient temperatures).
( 2 ) The maximum landing weights must be established as the weights at which compliance is shown with the applicable provisions of this part (including the landing and approach climb provisions of §§ 25.119 and 25.121(d) for altitudes and ambient temperatures).
( 3 ) The minimum takeoff distances must be established as the distances at which compliance is shown with the applicable provisions of this part (including the provisions of §§ 25.109 and 25.113, for weights, altitudes, temperatures, wind components, runway surface conditions (dry and wet), and runway gradients) for smooth, hard-surfaced runways. Additionally, at the option of the applicant, wet runway takeoff distances may be established for runway surfaces that have been grooved or treated with a porous friction course, and may be approved for use on runways where such surfaces have been designed constructed, and maintained in a manner acceptable to the Administrator.
( b ) The extremes for variable factors (such as altitude, temperature, wind, and runway gradients) are those at which compliance with the applicable provisions of this part is shown.
( c ) For airplanes certified in accordance with § 25.1420(a)(1) or (2), an operating limitation must be established to: ( 1 ) Prohibit intentional flight, including takeoff and landing, into icing conditions defined in Appendix O of this part for which the airplane has not been certified to safely operate; and
( 2 ) Require exiting all icing conditions if icing conditions defined in Appendix O of this part are encountered for which the airplane has not been certified to safely operate.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-38, 41 FR 55468, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29786, July 20, 1990; Amdt. 25-92, 63 FR 8321, Feb. 18, 1998; Amdt. 25-140, 79 FR 65528, Nov. 4, 2014]
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of TDI  Holding  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Blair Zykan, President, CEO, and CFO of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Blair Zykan
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Blair Zykan, President/CEO/CFO

Dated:  11/12/04
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3627

___________ Century Gardens, L.P.; Marvin * Gardens, L.P., * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Housing Authority of St. Louis County; * [UNPUBLISHED] United States Department of Housing * and Urban Development, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 13, 2003 Filed: May 16, 2003

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Century Gardens, L.P. (CG) and Marvin Gardens, L.P. (MG) entered into Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contracts with the Housing Authority of St. Louis County (HASLC) which provided that “[t]he effective date of this Contract is October 1, 1981,” and “[t]he term of this Contract is 15 years beginning on the effective date.” In September 1996 Congress passed a statute whereby HAP contracts expiring during fiscal year 1997 were to be renewed at the request of a multi-family housing project owner for not more than one year. In December 1996 the United1 The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2- States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) implemented the renewal statute, providing for renewal of HAP contracts expiring during the period from October 1, 1996, through September 30, 1997. In March 1997 CG and MG requested that their HAP contracts be renewed. HASLC refused to renew the HAP contracts on the ground that they expired on September 30, 1996. CG and MG sought a declaratory judgment that their HAP contracts expired on October 1, 1996, and were subject to renewal. The district court 1 determined that CG’s and MG’s HAP contracts expired on September 30, 1996, and thus were not subject to renewal, and entered summary judgment for HUD and HASLC. CG and MG appeal. Reviewing de novo, see Advantage Consulting Group, Ltd. v. ADT Sec. Sys., Inc. , 306 F.3d 582, 585 (8th Cir. 2002), we agree with the district court that the contracts expired on September 30 and were not renewable. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arch
Chemicals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Louis S. Massimo, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    LOUIS S. MASSIMO



Louis S. Massimo

Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2003





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Arch Chemicals, Inc. and will be
retained by Arch Chemicals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.600 Actions under assigned authority and petitions for review of staff action. ( a ) When an electronically filed record which has been submitted to the Department under this subpart, is disapproved (rejected), or a special tariff permission is approved or denied, under authority assigned by the Department of Transportation's Regulations, 14 CFR 385.13, such actions shall be understood to include the following provisions: ( 1 ) *Applicable to a record or records which is/are disapproved (rejected).* The record(s) disapproved (rejected) is/are void, without force or effect, and must not be used.
( 2 ) *Applicable to a record or records which is/are disapproved (rejected), and to special tariff permissions which are approved or denied.* This action is taken under authority assigned by the Department of Transportation in its Organization Regulations, 14 CFR 385.13. Persons entitled to petition for review of this action pursuant to the Department's Regulations, 14 CFR 385.50, may file such petitions within seven days after the date of this action. This action shall become effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review shall not preclude its effectiveness.
( b ) [Reserved]
Exhibit 99.3



| | KPMG LLP                      | Telephone | (514) 840-2100
| | ----------------------------- | --------- | --------------
| | Chartered Accountants         | Fax       | (514) 840-2187
| | 600 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West | Internet  | www.kpmg.ca   
| | Suite 1500                    |           |               
| | Montréal Québec H3A 0A3       |           |               

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors ofGildan Activewear Inc.

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F
of:

- our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated December
  8, 2009 on the consolidated balance sheets of Gildan Activewear Inc. as at
  October 4, 2009 and October 5, 2008 and the consolidated statements of
  earnings and comprehensive income, shareholders equity and cash flows for the
  years ended October 4, 2009, October 5, 2008 and September 30, 2007
- our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated December
  8, 2009 on the Reconciliation to United States Generally Accepted Accounting
  Principles
- our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated December
  8, 2009 on the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
  October 4, 2009

each of which is contained in this annual report on Form 40-F
of Gildan Activewear Inc. for the fiscal year ended October 4, 2009.

Chartered Accountants

Montréal, Canada December 8, 2009

KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited
liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. KPMG
Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

t0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148596

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148596

COA: 315473 

Oakland CC: 2012-240533-FH

DIONE DESHAWN DICKERSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 3, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Union Trust Company of Jamestown, New York, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Martin Merz, Deceased, Appellant; Mae M. Barrett et al., Respondents.

(Argued September 28, 1936;

decided October 13, 1936.)

*525
      *Thomas R. Wheeler*and *Rex Crosby*for appellant.

*J. Russell Rogerson*for Mae M. Barrett et al., respondents.

*Ernest D. Leet*for George L. Merz et al., respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs. First to fifteenth questions certified answered in the affirmative. Additional question certified answered in the negative. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM XOX
CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000798122
<NAME> XOX CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1
<CASH>                                   1,475,098
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              154,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,815,497
<PP&E>                                     549,059
<DEPRECIATION>                             377,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,129,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      122,535
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    73,823
<OTHER-SE>                              12,289,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,129,189
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           143,781
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              677,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (499,819)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        


</TABLE>
§ 129.22 Communication and navigation equipment for rotorcraft operations under VFR over routes navigated by pilotage. ( a ) No foreign air carrier may operate a rotorcraft under VFR over routes that can be navigated by pilotage unless the rotorcraft is equipped with the radio communication equipment necessary under normal operating conditions to fulfill the following: ( 1 ) Communicate with at least one appropriate station from any point on the route;
( 2 ) Communicate with appropriate air traffic control facilities from any point within Class B, Class C, or Class D airspace, or within a Class E surface area designated for an airport in which flights are intended; and
( 3 ) Receive meteorological information from any point en route.
( b ) No foreign air carrier may operate a rotorcraft at night under VFR over routes that can be navigated by pilotage unless that rotorcraft is equipped with— ( 1 ) Radio communication equipment necessary under normal operating conditions to fulfill the functions specified in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) Navigation equipment suitable for the route to be flown.
[Doc. No. FAA-2002-14002, 72 FR 31683, June 7, 2007]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned,
Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | May 9, 2008            



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | May 9, 2008