alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 129.18 Collision avoidance system.

Effective January 1, 2005, any airplane you, as a foreign air carrier, operate under part 129 must be equipped and operated according to the following table:

Collision Avoidance Systems

| If you operate in the United States any . . . | Then you must operate that airplane with: |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Turbine-powered airplane of more than 33,000 pounds maximum certificated takeoff weight | (1) An appropriate class of Mode S transponder that meets Technical Standard Order (TSO) C-112, or a later version, and one of the following approved units; (i) TCAS II that meets TSO C-119b (version 7.0), or takeoff weight a later version. |
| | (ii) TCAS II that meets TSO C-119a (version 6.04A Enhanced) that was installed in that airplane before May 1, 2003. If that TCAS II version 6.04A Enhanced no longer can be repaired to TSO C-119a standards, it must be replaced with a TCAS II that meets TSO C-119b (version 7.0), or a later version. (iii) A collision avoidance system equivalent to TSO C-119b (version 7.0), or a later version, capable of coordinating with units that meet TSO C-119a (version 6.04A Enhanced), or a later version. |
| (b) Turbine-powered airplane with a passenger-seat configuration, excluding any pilot seat, of 10-30 seats | (1) TCAS I that meets TSO C-118, or a later version, or (2) A collision avoidance system equivalent to excluding any TSO C-118, or a later version, or (3) A collision avoidance system and Mode S transponder that meet [paragraph (a)(1)](/on/2024-09-19/title-14/section-129.18#p-129.18(a)(1)) of this section. |

[Doc. No. FAA-2001-10910, [68 FR 15903](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-15903), Apr. 1, 2003; Doc. No. FAA-2022-1355; Amdt. No. 129-54; [87 FR 75847](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/87-FR-75847), Dec. 9, 2022]
##### 



Exhibit 32
    (b)
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  May 7, 2007

/s/  Robert
    J. DellingerRobert J. DellingerExecutive Vice President
    and Chief Financial Officer  63
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITEM 1 OF FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS. FIGURES ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST 100,000 (EXCEPT EPS).
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  215,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    149,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               399,400
<PP&E>                                         856,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 534,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 800,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          231,300
<BONDS>                                         75,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,200
<OTHER-SE>                                     428,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   800,900
<SALES>                                        220,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,700
<CGS>                                          157,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57


</TABLE>
June 2, 2015 

Mr. Guillermo Mercado 

Mercado Consultants 

17830 New Hampshire Avenue 

Ashton, MD 20861 

Dear Mr. Mercado: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 5, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1424), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4209 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4209

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title IX of the Social Security Act to improve emergency 
      unemployment relief for governmental entities and nonprofit 
                             organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Nonprofits from 
Catastrophic Cash Flow Strain Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVING EMERGENCY UNEMPLOYMENT RELIEF FOR GOVERNMENTAL 
              ENTITIES AND NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 903(i)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1103(i)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``during'' and 
        inserting ``with respect to'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``3309(a)(1)'' and 
        inserting ``3309(a)''; and
            (3) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the 
        following new subparagraph:
    ``(C) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds transferred 
to the account of a State under subparagraph (A) shall be used 
exclusively to reduce the amounts required to be paid in lieu of 
contributions into the State unemployment fund pursuant to such section 
by governmental entities and other organizations described in section 
3309(a) of such Code.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the amendments 
        made by subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the 
        enactment of section 2103 of the Relief for Workers Affected by 
        Coronavirus Act (contained in subtitle A of title II of 
        division A of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136)).
            (2) Application to weeks prior to enactment.--For weeks of 
        unemployment that occurred after March 12, 2020, and prior to 
        the date of enactment of this section, States may--
                    (A) issue reimbursements in accordance with section 
                903(i)(1)(C) of the Social Security Act, as in effect 
                prior to the date of enactment of this section; or
                    (B) reduce the amounts required to be paid in 
                accordance with such section 903(i)(1)(C), as amended 
                by subsection (a).

            Passed the Senate July 2, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4209

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title IX of the Social Security Act to improve emergency 
      unemployment relief for governmental entities and nonprofit 
                             organizations.
```
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05546**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 05546\05546_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 05546\05546_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 05546\05546_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 05546\05546_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05546\05546_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05546\05546_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05546\05546_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05546\05546_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05546\05546_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 05546\Certification Statement_05546.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 05546\Supporting Documentation\05546_A5-2 aerial map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05546\Supporting Documentation\A5-3 water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Jim D. Johnston, certify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; (4) I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and(5) I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 20, 2007     By: /s/ Jim D. Johnston         Jim D. Johnston    Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 432 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 432

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional tool to 
    prevent certain frauds against veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 2019

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional tool to 
    prevent certain frauds against veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Crimes Against Veterans 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL TOOL TO PREVENT CERTAIN FRAUDS AGAINST VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 47 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1041. Fraud regarding veterans' benefits
    ``(a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly 
engage in any scheme or artifice to defraud--
            ``(1) an individual of veterans' benefits; or
            ``(2) in connection with obtaining veteran's benefits for 
        an individual.
    ``(b) Penalties.--Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be 
fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section--
            ``(1) the term `veteran' has the meaning given that term in 
        section 101 of title 38; and
            ``(2) the term `veterans' benefits' means any benefit 
        provided under Federal law for a veteran or a dependent or 
        survivor of a veteran.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 47 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:

``1041. Fraud regarding veterans' benefits.''.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 18, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00415-CV

IN RE CURTIS LEE SHEPPARD, JR., Relator

On Appeal from the 78th District Court

Wichita County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 48,429-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice O'Neill

Before the Court is relator=s petition for habeas corpus complaining that this Court erred 

in affirming his conviction.1 The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not 

recount them herein. This Court has no jurisdiction over habeas corpus proceedings in which the 

relator seeks relief from a felony judgment after final conviction. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ANN. Art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2012). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator=s petition for a writ of 

habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction.

130415F.P05

 1 This Court does not normally have jurisdiction over Wichita County. However, on direct appeal, the Second Court of Appeals was 

recused from this case and transferred the case pursuant to Order of the Supreme Court of Texas, dated June 29, 2011, Misc. Docket No. 11-9122. 

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 50

e EXPLANATION =
3 & oa ; od
gs : | 3
ss aaa se
se Rocks younger than the Sharon Springs mem- AS
4f Rs ber of the Pierre shale (Upper Cretaceous) So
102 5 =
N,
g 3
$s Rocks older than the Sharon Springs w
T ss member of the Pierre shale. Includes z
101 $ Niobrara, Carlile,and Greenhorn for- @
N. mations (Upper Cretaceous)
The Sharon Springs member of the Pierre

shale of Late Cretaceous age is indicated
by a heavy line, dotted where inferred

a

Shale sample locality
Number refers to graphic section

. & £
T. Well Spring
98

Water-sample locality
Number refers to uranium content
in parts per billion

R.73 why R.72 W.
Gregory
T.
97
N.

R.66 W. R.65 W. R.64 W.

R.59 W. R.58 W. R.57 W.

Bryn

Roll W.

R12 W.

INDEX MAP

¢

Lo
bor
ro)

20 MILES

SCALE
Map compiled after Petsch(I946) and Condra and Reed (1950)

SOUTH DAKOTA

- wa

Upper Cretaceous

ro
SW 1/4 sec.13.
20 T100 NR.72W,
NE 1/4 sec. 31 Gregory County
T.104.N.,R.72W, 25
Lyman County NE 1/4 sec.8
ey T.Q5N.,R.65 W.
22 Charles Mix County
a SWI/4 sec. 4 == = 26
al T.102 N.,R.71W. NE I/4sec4
‘Cen.W 1/2 sec.lI Brule County Feseerer 1.930, R. 63 W.
a T103 N,R72W. s Charles Mix County
19 4 Lyman County q 5
NW [4 sec. 17 J on x / a
T.IO4N.,R.7IW. r J \ / T £
16 Lyman County 1s \ ig 29 i ! '
7— 7 | wie 4 28 NE 1/4 sec.13 =
7 NW 4 se6,25 = 18 vi 4 | 1 SEV4 sec. 5 re . 7 SEcorsec8 =. 33N,, ROW. &
: ae . NW 1/4 sec.25,7 + J T.99N.,R.70 W. V4sec.24 1.93N,R.56W. oe},
Buffalo County NE 1/4 sec.23 ae . ey . T92N,R.6IW. Knox County 31 & 2
TIOGN. Reiw, TAOSN,R7IWZ = 4 | r Charles Mix County eM SIW. Yankton County Pate 9
ISooe HOON» R71 W.  Brule County [ | r Bon Homme County = Se Cen. W I/2sec.17 cai
aie [ 1 L 7 = _ 30 T32N.,R.5W, °
re] it = 4 | a |  \ SW!/4sec.30 Knox County al S
fo | ee | \rssunew as) / 18 |S
I ] + f Knox Count) iseeal
To oe t = f ; - oe
7 fea Tf = = 5
a ‘oom 4 ot r a S e
7 oes T= + : iran S
i 5 ‘ T i i ion &
Ir saat
ara
= = Z are = 7
= = o| 2
te 3 oO) =
Fg, b 3, b 4, at t ra at peg, eae ey, eke =e €
Datum is the base of the Sharon Springs member , . Ze s
8 ays EXPLANATION alse
sal Graphic sections &5| 5
Lithology els
= a 1 neo
a= == a eo ee
Le Gray shale Black shale Silty shale Bentonite Sandstone Limestone concretions Marl Ferruginous concretions
Grab-sample horizon Sample data
Pp =
F7> Equivalent uranium content
Sampled interval |
Uranium content
L10 Shown only where equivalent uranium is greater
than .0O3 percent. except at location |:
fo) .01 Percent uranium and equivalent uranium
r 5
Lo
Vertical
scale

GEOLOGIC MAP AND GRAPHIC SECTIONS SHOWING SAMPLE LOCALITIES AND URANIUM CONTENT OF THE SHARON SPRINGS MEMBER OF THE PIERRE SHALE ALONG THE MISSOURI RIVER,
SOUTH DAKCTA AND NEBRASKA
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.404 Formal complaints. ( a ) *Filing.* Any person may make a formal complaint to the Assistant General Counsel about any violation of the economic regulatory provisions of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII or of the Department's rules, regulations, orders, or other requirements. Every formal complaint shall conform to the requirements of §§ 302.3 and 302.4, concerning the form and filing of documents. The filing of a complaint shall result in the institution of an enforcement proceeding only if the Assistant General Counsel issues a notice instituting such a proceeding as to all or part of the complaint under § 302.406(a) or the General Counsel does so under § 302.406(c).
( b ) *Amendment.* A formal complaint may be amended at any time before service of an answer to the complaint. After service of an answer but before institution of an enforcement proceeding, the complaint may be amended with the permission of the Assistant General Counsel. After institution of an enforcement proceeding, the complaint may be amended only on grant of a motion filed under § 302.11.
( c ) *Insufficiency of formal complaint.* In any case where the Assistant General Counsel is of the opinion that a complaint does not sufficiently set forth matters required by any applicable rule, regulation or order of the Department, or is otherwise insufficient, he or she may advise the complainant of the deficiency and require that any additional information be supplied by amendment.
( d ) *Joinder of complaints or complainants.* Two or more grounds of complaints involving substantially the same purposes, subject or state of facts may be included in one complaint even though they involve more than one respondent. Two or more complainants may join in one complaint if their respective causes of complaint are against the same party or parties and involve substantially the same purposes, subject or state of facts. The Assistant General Counsel may separate or split complaints if he or she finds that the joinder of complaints, complainants, or respondents will not be conducive to the proper dispatch of the Department's business or the ends of justice.
( e ) *Service.* A formal complaint, and any amendments thereto, shall be served by the person filing such documents upon each party complained of, upon the General Counsel, and upon the Assistant General Counsel.
[Docket No. OST-97-2090, 65 FR 6457, Feb. 9, 2000, as amended at 84 FR 15936, Apr. 16, 2019]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-26 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc:

Appendix Summons Arthur J. Gonzalez Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-26 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc:

Appendix Summons Arthur J. Gonzalez Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1286

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LARRY C. WELDON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,

Chief District Judge. (CA-00-21-2-BO(2))

Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 6, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry C. Weldon, Appellant Pro Se. Annette Marie Wietecha,

Lawrence P. Blaskopf, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry C. Weldon appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to the United States on its action seeking to

reduce to judgment tax assessments made for years 1982, 1983, 1984,

1986, 1989, and 1990. Our review of the record and the district

court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Weldon, No. CA-00-21-2-BO(2) (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED