alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

26117

Federal Register

Vol. 65, No. 88

Friday, May 5, 2000

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 7302 of May 2, 2000

Jewish Heritage Week, 2000

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

For centuries, Jews from every corner of the globe have come to America

seeking the right to worship in freedom and to pursue their individual

hopes and dreams in peace. For many, the journey was a desperate flight

from oppression and persecution to a new life in a new country. Bolstered

by powerful family and community ties and drawing strength and hope

from their ancient religious traditions, Jews in America not only survived

the difficult transition, but also thrived.

From science and the arts to business and the law; as teachers, physicians,

journalists, judges, musicians, and policymakers; from neighborhood stores

to the corridors of Congress; from the Armed Forces to the Supreme Court,

generations of American Jews have succeeded in every sector of our society.

And the rewards of that success are shared by us all. Our Nation has

benefited immeasurably from the character, values, and achievements of

our Jewish citizens.

Building on the Jewish tradition of hospitality toward strangers and acutely

aware of the long and tragic history of prejudice and persecution against

their people, Jews in America have committed themselves to tolerance,

justice, human rights, and the rule of law. American Jews have shared

their resources generously with health and human services programs, civil

rights groups, educational institutions, arts organizations, and so many more.

In communities across our Nation, in small towns and big cities, synagogues

and yeshivas have become centers of community service and civic responsibility.

During Jewish Heritage Week, let us acknowledge and give thanks for the

many contributions that Jews have brought to our national life and character,

and let us celebrate the rich religious and ethnic threads that Jewish men

and women have woven into the tapestry that is America.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 7 through May

14, 2000, as Jewish Heritage Week. I urge all Americans to observe this

week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this second day

of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence

[FR Doc. 00–11440

Filed 5–4–00; 8:45 am]

of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fourth.

œ–

Billing code 3195–01–P
#### § 135.177 Emergency equipment requirements for aircraft having a passenger seating configuration of more than 19 passengers.

(a) No person may operate an aircraft having a passenger seating configuration, excluding any pilot seat, of more than 19 seats unless it is equipped with the following emergency equipment:

(1) At least one approved first-aid kit for treatment of injuries likely to occur in flight or in a minor accident that must:

(i) Be readily accessible to crewmembers.

(ii) Be stored securely and kept free from dust, moisture, and damaging temperatures.

(iii) Contain at least the following appropriately maintained contents in the specified quantities:

| Contents | Quantity |
| --- | --- |
| Adhesive bandage compresses, 1-inch | 16 |
| Antiseptic swabs | 20 |
| Ammonia inhalants | 10 |
| Bandage compresses, 4-inch | 8 |
| Triangular bandage compresses, 40-inch | 5 |
| Arm splint, noninflatable | 1 |
| Leg splint, noninflatable | 1 |
| Roller bandage, 4-inch | 4 |
| Adhesive tape, 1-inch standard roll | 2 |
| Bandage scissors | 1 |
| Protective nonpermeable gloves or equivalent | 1 pair |

(2) A crash axe carried so as to be accessible to the crew but inaccessible to passengers during normal operations.

(3) Signs that are visible to all occupants to notify them when smoking is prohibited and when safety belts must be fastened. The signs must be constructed so that they can be turned on during any movement of the aircraft on the surface, for each takeoff or landing, and at other times considered necessary by the pilot in command. “No smoking” signs shall be turned on when required by § 135.127.

(4) [Reserved]

(b) Each item of equipment must be inspected regularly under inspection periods established in the operations specifications to ensure its condition for continued serviceability and immediate readiness to perform its intended emergency purposes.

[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-25, 53 FR 12362, Apr. 13, 1988; Amdt. 135-43, 57 FR 19245, May 4, 1992; Amdt. 135-44, 57 FR 42676, Sept. 15, 1992; Amdt. 135-47, 59 FR 1781, Jan. 12, 1994; Amdt. 135-53, 59 FR 52643, Oct. 18, 1994; 59 FR 55208, Nov. 4, 1994; Amdt. 121-281, 66 FR 19045, Apr. 12, 2001]
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et 

al., 

Debtors. 

PROMESA Title III. 

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICE 

TO THE HONORABLE BANKRUPTCY COURT: 

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel for and on behalf of creditor MIGRANT 

HEALTH CENTER, INC. for all purposes in connection with this case. Pursuant to Bankruptcy 

Rules 2002, 3017, and 9010(b) the undersigned hereby requests service of all notices, 

applications, motions, orders, pleadings, reports, plans and disclosure statements filed or served 

in this case, and requests that the name and address of the undersigned be added to all mailing 

matrices in this case. Service may be made and directed as follows: 

 Thomas T. Pennington (B.P.R. #9605) 

Reno & Cavanaugh, PLLC 

424 Church Street, Suite 2910 

Nashville, Tennessee 37129 

Telephone: (615) 866-2322 

Facsimile: (615) 866-2323 

Email: tpennington@renocavanaugh.com 

This notice of appearance and request for notices is submitted for the limited purpose of 

receiving copies of notices, pleadings, judgments, and orders in this case. By submitting this 

notice of appearance and request for notices, MIGRANT HEALTH CENTER, INC. is not 

consenting to or submitting to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court for any purpose and 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3357 Filed:06/27/18 Entered:06/27/18 14:06:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2 

expressly reserve the right to contest the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and/or to demand a 

jury trial in any matter or proceeding to which MIGRANT HEALTH CENTER, INC. may be a 

party. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ María Celeste Rodríguez Miranda 

María Celeste Rodríguez Miranda 

D.P.R. Bar No. 213113 

Bufete Rodríguez Miranda, C.S.P. 

P.O. Box 365072 

San Juan, PR 00936-5072 

(787) 408-0808 (tel) 

mcrm100@msn.com 

/s/Thomas T. Pennington 

Thomas T. Pennington* (B.P.R. #9605) 

Reno & Cavanaugh 

424 Church Street, Suite 2910 

Nashville, Tennessee 37129 

(615) 866-2322 (office) 

(615) 866-2323 (fax) 

tpennington@renocavanaugh.com 

*Admitted pro hac vice 

Attorneys for Migrant Health Center, Inc. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3357 Filed:06/27/18 Entered:06/27/18 14:06:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on June 27, 2018, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically. 

Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system to all parties 

indicated on the electronic filing receipt. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s 

electronic filing system. 

/s/Thomas T. Pennington 

Thomas T. Pennington (B.P.R. #9605) 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3357 Filed:06/27/18 Entered:06/27/18 14:06:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
#### § 254.6 Periodic adjustments.

The Department of Transportation will review the domestic baggage liability limit prescribed in this part every two years. The Department will use the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers as of July of each review year to calculate the revised domestic baggage liability limit amount. The Department will use the following formula: $2500 × (a/b) rounded to the nearest $100, where a = July CPI-U of year of current adjustment and b = the CPI-U figure in December 1999 when the inflation adjustment provision was added to this part.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2020-0251, 86 FR 2539, Jan. 13, 2021]
#### GRAY v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA.

(Decided November 25, 1915.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

No' counsel marked for appellant. Brown & Ward,' for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2009-1230

Directorate Identifier: 2009NM088AD

ALS P3, CMR --- 7/31/08

CMR 955.3019/92,116 --- 7/31/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. Sw.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.2271221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 pm., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Dale: 03/05/2008
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0015 SAT Date: 11/1/2013 Print Date: 12/3/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG; IRR-E,S,MM,L; AQUATOX Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0012-3/5-6 FATE: Estimations for typical Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 4.21 (E) S = Dispersible / 6.57 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.66 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = 2.55 (E)POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for surfactant effects on the lung; irritation to eye, skin (chronic), mucous membranes and lung based on surfactant properties of the compound.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 5.1 green algal 96-h EC50 2.5 fish

_ chronic value 0.873 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.534
algal

_ chronic value 1
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Aliphatic Amines-Acids; SAR chemical class = Aliphatic Amines; MW 484; S = dispersible (P); liquid with unknown mp (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; DW hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 53.4

SARs Aliphatic Amines-Acids SAR Class Aliphatic Amines-Acids Ecotox Category Aliphatic Amines
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
#### Thomas W. Farrin *v.*Jonathan Creager et al.

(No. 6,779.)

On the purchase by the plaintiff of a five year leasehold, with privilege of purchase, under proceedings in foreclosure of a mortgage, the sheriff is not entitled to poundage.

Special Term. — On motion to retax costs.

In this case, the plaintiff held a mortgage executed by the defendant Creager, upon a leasehold estate, having connected with it, a right of privilege to purchase the fee. The lease was only for five years, and the inference is, though not stated in the pleading, that the privilege to purchase only continued with the lease. The plaintiff' brought his action to realize upon his security. He obtained an order for the .sale of the lease, with the right to purchase, it being the object to assign both to the purchaser, and such a course having obviously been within the intention and contemplation of the parties in giving and taking the security.

A sale is made by the sheriff under the order of the court) *465and the plaintiff is himself the purchaser. The only question made is as to the fees or poundage of the sheriff'.

*Theophilus Gaines, and Snow & Bradstreet,*for plaintiff.

*Mills & Hoadly,*for the sheriff.

Gholson, J.

The sheriff claims that there was a sale merely of personal property, and that the law governing sales of real estate, where the plaintiff is the purchaser, does not apply. I do not think so, but on the contrary, that this case, if not within the letter strictly, is within the spirit and intent of the statute, and that its provisions must apply and govern.

Poundage refused.
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.34 Exceptions to tentative decisions of the DOT decisionmaker. ( a ) *Time for filing.* Within ten (10) days after service of any tentative decision of the DOT decisionmaker, any party to a proceeding may file exceptions to such decision with the DOT decisionmaker.
( b ) *Form and contents of exceptions.* Each exception shall be separately numbered and shall be stated as a separate point, and appellants shall not restate the same point in several exceptions. Each exception shall state, sufficiently identify, and be limited to, an ultimate conclusion in the decision to which exception is taken (such as, selection of one carrier rather than another to serve any point or points; points included in or excluded from a new route; imposition or failure to impose a given restriction; determination of a rate at a given amount rather than another). No specific exception shall be taken with respect to underlying findings or statements, but exceptions to an ultimate conclusion shall be deemed to include exceptions to all underlying findings and statements pertaining thereto; *Provided, however,* That exceptions shall specify any matters of law, fact, or policy that were not argued before the administrative law judge but will be set forth for the first time on brief to the DOT decisionmaker.
( c ) *Effect of failure to file timely and adequate exceptions.* No objection may be made on brief or at a later time to an ultimate conclusion that is not expressly made the subject of an exception in compliance with the provisions of this section; *Provided, however,* That any party may file a brief in support of the decision and in opposition to the exceptions filed by any other party.
#### THOMAS F. RYAN v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 42110.

Decided June 4, 1934]

*Mr. George A. King, Mr. John W. Gaskins,*and *King*ds *King*for the plaintiff.

*Miss Stella Akin,*with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General George C. Sweeney,*for the defendant.

*724Whaley, *Judge,*

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, an engineman, first class, Navy Department, sues to recover the sum of $573.20, allegedly due him as accumulated additional pay at the rate of $0.05 per hour from December 2, 1926, to June 30, 1931, under the provisions of the Schedule of Wages for Civil Employees under the Naval Establishment.

*725Plaintiff was assigned in charge of the power-house watch at the naval fuel depot, Point Loma, California, on October 8, 1920, and has been serving continuously in that capacity. During the period in question in this suit, there was in force and effect a Schedule of Wages for Civil Employees under the Naval Establishment, note 52 of which reads as follows:

> “ Mechanics in charge of a watch in the power house of less than six employees, exclusive of laborers and helpers, shall, unless holding a supervisory rating, receive $0.05 per hour in addition to their schedule rate of pay.”

The only change made in this regulation was that in the Schedule of Wages for 1929 the word “ six ” was changed to “ four ” and the regulation so continued during the years 1980 and 1931. The plaintiff did not receive the additional pay during the period involved herein, but after June 30, 1931, he received $0.05 per hour in addition to his schedule rate of pay.

Defendant contends that plaintiff’s request for additional pay was refused by the Comptroller General and upon a petition for review, settlement was refused because the plaintiff did not show that he had been officially designated in permanent charge of a watch.

The evidence shows that plaintiff served continuously as mechanic in charge of the watch at the naval fuel depot for more than six years prior to the period in question; that he served continuously in that capacity for the more than four years involved in this suit; in all, a period of approximately eleven years’ continuous service. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the plaintiff waipcontinuously and permanently in charge of the watch at the naval fuel depot and is entitled to recover the additional pay of $0.05 per hour as provided by the regulation.

Judgment will be rendered in the amount of $573.20. It is so ordered.

Williams, *Judge;*LittletoN, *Judge;*GeeeN, *Judge;*and Booth, *Chief*Justice, concur.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3, No. 333-187806) of Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V., of our reports dated April 16, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Fomento
Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries included in its Annual Report on Form 20-F, for the
year ended December 31, 2013.



Mancera, S.C. A member practice of Ernst & Young Global Limited/s/ Agustin AguilarAgustin Aguilar


Monterrey, Mexico

April 16, 2014



Exhibit 23.1-1
#### PORTER v. THE STATE.

(Decided February 2nd, 1915.)

Appeal from Henry Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. M. Sollie.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Thomas, J.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 98-20048

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20048

Conference Calendar

 

MELVIN CHARLES JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division; J. HARRISON;

JOHN DOE, Unknown Physician; J.R. GABBARD,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-3472

--------------------

February 16, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Melvin Charles Jackson, Texas prisoner # 580613, seeks leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), following the district

court’s certification that his appeal from the dismissal of his

civil-rights complaint was not taken in good faith. Jackson

argues that the district court abused its discretion in finding

that his complaints of deliberate indifference to his serious 

medical needs were frivolous. Jackson has not shown that he can

bring any claims of arguable merit on appeal. Accordingly,
No. 98-20048

-2-

Jackson’s IFP motion is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2. 

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Service Administration for Children and Families
 Proposed Projects *Title:*
                     Annual Survey of Refugees. *OMB No.:*
                     0970-0033. *Description:*
                     The Annual Survey of Refugees is conducted each Fall by a contractor. Approximately 2,000 refugee families are interviewed via telephone with questions relating to employment, English language skills and training, occupational training, education, and welfare utilization. *Respondents:*
                     Individuals or Households. *Annual Burden Estimates:* Instrument
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses per respondent
Average 
                             burden hours per response  
                             (minutes)
Total burden hoursAnnual Survey of Refugees
2,000
1
40
1,350
 *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*
                     1,350. In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Administration for Children and Families is soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the information collection described above. Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and comments may be forwarded by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW, Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. The Department specifically requests comments on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted within 60 days of this publication. Dated: May 1, 2000. Bob Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 00-11250  Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
§ 25.607 Fasteners. ( a ) Each removable bolt, screw, nut, pin, or other removable fastener must incorporate two separate locking devices if— ( 1 ) Its loss could preclude continued flight and landing within the design limitations of the airplane using normal pilot skill and strength; or
( 2 ) Its loss could result in reduction in pitch, yaw, or roll control capability or response below that required by Subpart B of this chapter.
( b ) The fasteners specified in paragraph (a) of this section and their locking devices may not be adversely affected by the environmental conditions associated with the particular installation.
( c ) No self-locking nut may be used on any bolt subject to rotation in operation unless a nonfriction locking device is used in addition to the self-locking device.
[Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5674, Apr. 8, 1970]