alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

District of Puerto Rico

Assured Guaranty Corp.; Assured Guaranty

Municipal Corp.; Financial Guaranty Insurance

Company; and National Public Finance Guarantee

Corporation,

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; Financial Oversight and Management Board

for Puerto Rico; Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority;

Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority; Hon. Ricardo Antonio

Rosselló Nevares; Gerardo Portela Franco; Carlos Contreras Aponte; José

Iván Marrero Rosado; Hon. Raúl Maldonado Gautier; and Natalie A. Jaresko,

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

Thorugh the Secretary of Justice

Calle Olimpo - Miramar

San Juan, PR

Heriberto J. Burgos Pérez

Casellas Alcover & Burgos PSC

PO Box 364924

San Juan, PR 00936-4924

hburgos@cabprlaw.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:254-6 Filed:06/03/17 Entered:06/03/17 18:25:07 Desc:

Summons of the Commonwealth of P.R. Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:254-6 Filed:06/03/17 Entered:06/03/17 18:25:07 Desc:

Summons of the Commonwealth of P.R. Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

JOHN MICHAEL PERZEL,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 166 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### § 187.5 Duplicates of licenses.

The fee for furnishing to a person entitled thereto a replacement, duplicate, or facsimile of a certificate or other document evidencing a license, for which a fee is not specifically provided elsewhere in this chapter, is $2.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 14

, 20 12

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 12

- 00 395

- CR

____________

SHAWN BRADLEY ROGERS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185 th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1337425



### MEMORANDUM OP IN ION

Appellant entered a guilty plea to unauthorized use of a motor vehcile . In

accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court

sentenced appellant on April 9, 2012 , to confinement for three yea r s in the Institutional

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice . Appellant filed a pro se notice of

appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant ’ s rig ht to appeal in which the

court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See

T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court ’ s certification is included in the record on2

appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court ’ s certification.

See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison

.
Do Not Publish

— T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)
# Official Journal L 193/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 193 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6219 July 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 193

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6219 July 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1244 of 1 July 2019 amending Decision 2002/364/EC as regards requirements for HIV and HCV antigen and antibody combined tests and as regards requirements for nucleic acid amplification techniques with respect to reference materials and qualitative HIV assays
  (notified under document C(2019) 4632)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1244 of 1 July 2019 amending Decision 2002/364/EC as regards requirements for HIV and HCV antigen and antibody combined tests and as regards requirements for nucleic acid amplification techniques with respect to reference materials and qualitative HIV assays
  (notified under document C(2019) 4632)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2019) 4632)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.18
Freeman Spogli & Co.

August 17, 2001

Mr. Charles A French
6400 8. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 150
Englewood, CO 80111

Dear Chuck:

     On behalf of Hudson Respiratory Care, Inc., I am pleased to offer you the
position of President and Chief Executive Officer. I look forward to both a
mutually productive and enjoyable relationship. As reviewed, here are the
details of the offer we are extending to you:

     [_]  You are joining Hudson Respiratory Care, Inc. as President and Chief
          Executive Officer and will serve as a Director on the Company's Board.

     [_]  Your base salary will be $16,666.67 per month ($200,000,00
          annualized).

     [_]  Hudson Respiratory Care, Inc. will reimburse you for all reasonable
          business expenses including a $4,500 per month housing allowance.

     What is presented in this letter is only a summary. If anything here is
inconsistent with any federal, state, or local laws, Hudson Respiratory Care,
Inc. will comply with its obligations under such laws.

     It is of course understood, however, that you are an employee-at-will and
that neither you nor Hudson Respiratory Care, Inc. is obligated to continue in
our employment relationship if either of us does not wish to do so.

<PAGE>

     Kindly indicate your acknowledgement and acceptance of the terms of this
letter by signing the enclosed copy in the space provided. Please keep one copy
for your records and return the signed copy to this office,

Sincerely yours,
FREEMAN SPOGLI & CO LLC

/s/ Charles P. Rullman
------------------------------------------------
Charles P. Rullman
Vice President

/s/ Charles A. French                                     8/17/01
------------------------------------------------          ------------------
Charles A. French                                         Date

                                        2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3014 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:45:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3014 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:45:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3014 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:45:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3014 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:45:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3014 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:45:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3014 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:45:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 6
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Element 21 Golf Company (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Philip Clark,
Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:





(1)
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Date:
      February 12, 2010
            
            By:  /s/
      Philip Clark, CA, CPA, CFAChief
      Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer
AFFIRM; Opinion Filed November 14, 2012

In The

Qlourt of ppcat

ififtj Ottrict of ZJtcxa at Oafta

No. 05-12-00591-CR

No. 05-12-00592-CR

BRUCE KEVIN CONWAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

________

Trial Court Cause Nos. F07-57835-M, F10-61538-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices ONei11, FitzGerald, and Lang-Miers

Opinion by Justice FitzGerald

Bruce Kevin Conway was convicted of possession with intent to deliver cocaine in an

amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams and possession with intent to deliver

cocaine in an amount of one gram or more but less than four grams. Punishment was assessed in

the first case at ten years’ imprisonment. Punishment was assessed in the second case at ten

years’ imprisonment and a $2,000 fine. We adopted the trial court’s finding that appellant no

longer desires to pursue the appeals and we ordered the appeals submitted without briefs. See

TEx. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4). Absent briefs no issues are before us.
C

CCoC

C

Zvm
/ ?

Qrourt of Ztppeat

jfiftj ttrict of exa at at1a

JUDGMENT

BRUCE KEVIN CONWAY. Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.

No. O5l2-OO59 1-CR V. F07-57835-M).

Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald.

TIlE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices O’Neill and Lang-Miers

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we AFFiRM the trial court’s judgment.

Judgment entered November 14, 2012. -

KERRY P. Fl FZGFRAI 1)

.Jt1STI( F
ififtj Oitritt of 1texa at atta

JUDGMENT

BRUCE KEVIN CONWAY. Appellant

No. 05-12-00592-CR V.

Ti-IF STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 1 94th Judicial District

Court of Dallas County. Texas (Tr.C’t.No.

F 10-61 538-M).

Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald,

Justices O’Neill and Lang-Miers

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment.

Judgment entered November 14. 2012.

Qlourt of 1pptat
#### DAVIS *v.*FORD’S ADMINISTRATOR.

Debt on simple contract — writ will show the characterof the suit — advance by guardian— settlement with court.

Debt on simple contract is not barred by the statute of limitations of 1810.

Although the declaration deduce a liability as in debt, and omit to state any promise, the suit will be held to be assumpsit if the writ is so.

The record of the settlement of a guardian with the probate court concludes the guardian but not the ward.

Where a guardian, advance to his ward out of his own pocket, and on settlement with the court a balance is found in his favor, it is doubtful whether he can recover of the administrator at law, or if he have any relief except in equity.

Assumpsit. The plaintiff declared as guardian for Catharine .Ford, the intestate, for money disbursed for her when a minor. He averred that he had settled his guardian account with the Probate Court, and that a balance was found due him of $>253 28 from his ward, the defendant’s intestate, *whereby she became bound to*pay, *Sfc.*Plea, that the action did not accrue in six years, to which there was a general demurrer, and joinder.

By the Court.

If this is an action of debt as is contended, it is not barred by the plea, or the statute of 1810. If it be assumpsit, it is barred. There is no assumpsit laid in the count, the liability is otherwise deduced; yet the defendant has pleaded non assumpsit, and the statute of limitations, and the writ is in assumpsit.

We think the record of the proceedings of the Probate Court not the gist of the action, but only an incident to the plaintiff’s title; no proferí of the record is made. The proceeding is conclusive upon the guardian, but not upon his minor ward. He may controvert it. The suit is a novel one, and we doubt if it can be *201sustained, or if the plaintiff have any relief at law; but however that may be, there is no assumpsit in the declaration., and of course no title in the plaintiff is shown. If there was a right of action set out it would be barred by the statute of limitations.

Demurrer overruled, and judgment for the plaintiff.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3466-2 Filed:07/10/18 Entered:07/10/18 15:52:33 Desc:Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 4Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3466-2 Filed:07/10/18 Entered:07/10/18 15:52:33 Desc:Exhibit 2 Page 2 of 4Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3466-2 Filed:07/10/18 Entered:07/10/18 15:52:33 Desc:Exhibit 2 Page 3 of 4Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3466-2 Filed:07/10/18 Entered:07/10/18 15:52:33 Desc:Exhibit 2 Page 4 of 4
§ 29.602 Critical parts. ( a ) *Critical part.* A critical part is a part, the failure of which could have a catastrophic effect upon the rotocraft, and for which critical characterists have been identified which must be controlled to ensure the required level of integrity.
( b ) If the type design includes critical parts, a critical parts list shall be established. Procedures shall be established to define the critical design characteristics, identify processes that affect those characteristics, and identify the design change and process change controls necessary for showing compliance with the quality assurance requirements of part 21 of this chapter.
[Doc. No. 29311, 64 FR 46232, Aug. 24, 1999]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraSite, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Stephen H. Clark, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. July 28, 2004 /s/ STEPHEN H. CLARK
Stephen H. Clark
Chief Executive Officer
 54
Contact: PJM News, toll free at 866

- PJM

- NEWS (866

- 756

- 6397) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC., AND DUKE ENERGY KENTUCKY, INC., SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATED INTO PJM Regional Operations Strengthen Reliability, Coordination and Competition

(Valley Forge, Pa.

– Jan. 3, 2012)

– At midnight Eastern Time, Jan. 1, PJM Interconnection successfully assumed operational control of the transmission systems of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. and Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc., both subsidiaries of Duke Energy Corporation, and began administering open, competitive wholesale electricity markets in those areas.

With the integrations, PJM’s all

- time peak demand would have been 163,848 megawatts (MW). PJM now includes 185,600 MW of generating capacity and more than 62,000 miles of transmission lines. The generato rs in PJM can produce more electricity than Canada and Mexico combined.

Statistics for PJM with the addition of Duke Energy Ohio and Kentucky are in the table below.

Key Statistics PJM
1993 (PJM Interconnection Association formed) PJM

as of May 31,
2011 PJM

with ATSI & CPP PJM

with Duke OH & KY

Millions of people served 22 54 58 60.1

All

- time peak demand 46,429 144,644 158,448 163,848

Generating capacity in megawatts 55,575 167,362 180,400 185,600

Miles of transmission lines 6,821 56,750 61,200 62,591

Square miles of territory 48,700 168,500 211,000 214,000

– MORE

– 

# NEWS

RELEASEPage 2 of 2 / DUKE OHIO AND KENTUCKY SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATED INTO PJM

PJM Interconnection, founded in 1927, ensures the reliability of the high

- voltage electric power system serv ing 60 million people in all or parts of Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia. PJM coordinates and directs the operation o f the region’s transmission grid, which includes 62,000 miles of transmission lines; administers a competitive wholesale electricity market; and plans regional transmission expansion improvements to maintain grid reliability and relieve congestion. Visit P JM at www.pjm.com

. ###
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00681

- CV

CUERO RETAIL PARTNER SHIP, LTD.

v. DEWITT COUNTY APPRAI SAL DISTRICT

On Appeal from the 135th District Court of De Witt County , Texas Trial Cause No. 18

- 10

- 24,686

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEAL S, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 28, 2019
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.49

             NEW RESTRICTED STOCK BONUS GRANTS TO EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
          UNDER THE OPENWAVE SYSTEMS INC. 2001 STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN



The following grants were made using the form of Restricted Stock Bonus
agreement filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on September 30, 2002.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       Grant           Number of                 Vesting
    Participant        Date        Restricted Shares             Schedule
    -----------        ----        -----------------             --------
<S>                  <C>           <C>                 <C>
Steve Peters         4/29/03            200,000        50% of the shares on 4/29/04, and
                                                       an additional 1/24th of the shares
                                                       monthly thereafter beginning on
                                                       5/29/04

Joshua Pace          4/29/03             75,000        50% of the shares on 4/29/04, and
                                                       an additional 1/24th of the shares
                                                       monthly thereafter beginning on
                                                       5/29/04
</TABLE>
§ 291.43 Statement of operation for section 41103 operations. Form 291-A contains the following data elements: ( a ) Total operating revenue, categorized as follows: ( 1 ) Transport revenues from the carriage of property in scheduled and nonscheduled service;
( 2 ) Transport revenues from the carriage of mail in scheduled and nonscheduled service; and
( 3 ) Transport-related revenues;
( b ) Total operating expenses;
( c ) Operating profit or loss, computed by subtracting the total operating expenses from the total operating revenues; and
( d ) Net income, computed by subtracting the total operating and nonoperating expenses, including interest expenses and income taxes, from the total operating and nonoperating revenues.
[Doc. No. OST-98-4043, 67 FR 49227, July 30, 2002]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN RE: PROMESA

 TITLE III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT MANAGEMENT 

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

 as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., (Jointly Administered) 

 

 DEBTORS 

_________________________________________________ 

 

IN RE: PROMESA

 TITLE III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

 as representative of No. 17 BK3567-LTS

PUERTO RICO HIGHWAYS AND

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (“HTA”)

 DEBTOR

_________________________________________________

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

COMES NOW creditor, Finca Matilde, Inc., represented by the undersigned attorney and

very respectfully states and prays:

1. On September 4, 2018, Finca Matilde, Inc. filed a motion for relief from stay (docket 

no. 3851).

2. Finca Matilde, Inc. withdraws the motion for relief from stay at docket no. 3851.

WHEREFORE, the undersigned attorney respectfully requests the Court to take notice of 

its withdrawal.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4025 Filed:10/08/18 Entered:10/08/18 09:49:12 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: I hereby certify that on this same date I electronically 

filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to the Office of the United States Trustee and to the attorneys of 

record.

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In Ponce, Puerto Rico, this 8th of October, 2018. 

/s/María E. Vicéns Rivera

 MARĺA E. VICÉNS RIVERA

USDC- PR 226711

9140 MARINA ST., SUITE 801

PONCE, PUERTO RICO 00717

TEL. / FAX: (787) 259-1999

 E-mail: mevicens@yahoo.com 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4025 Filed:10/08/18 Entered:10/08/18 09:49:12 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PERRY JOSEPH
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D19

- 2665

[ July 16, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael Lynch , Judge; L.T. Case No. 04001123CF10D

.

Harold D. Thompson of DeNovo Law, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affi rmed

.

G ROSS

, G ERBER
, and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.