alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ICP At‘ k

. :)\ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

BILL B. BOKMA,

Petitioner,

v. OP 24-0575

BOB OLSEN, PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR, S.T.A.R.T., Respondent. 

# RILED OCT

-2 2024
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Bill B. Bokma has filed aPetition for Writ ofHabeas Corpus, requesting additional credit forjail time and elapsed time. He specifically questions why the Cascade County District Court did not give any explanation for additional elapsed time credit while on supervision and until the February 7, 2023 Report ofViolation. This Court secured copies of Bokma's sentencing judgments. In open court on October 14, 2021, the Cascade County District Court sentenced Bokma to the DOC for a suspended, three-year term "on the condition that the Defendant enter and successfully complete the Eighth Judicial District Adult Drug Treatment Court program." It appears that the District Court sentenced Bokma, pursuant to § 61-8-741, MCA (2019), which allows suspension of a sentence on the contingency ofDUI treatment court completion. The Montana Legislature repealed this statute in 2021. 2021 Mont. Laws ch. 498, §. 44. On July 19, 2023, theDistrict Courtheld an evidentiaryhearingwhere itrevokedBokma's suspended sentence and deemed Bokma's failureto complete adult drugtreatment court as
a non-compliance violation, which does not appear to comport with the definitions found in §§ 46-18-203(10)(b), and 46-23-1001(3), MCA (2021 and 2023). Upon review, this Court has three issues that arise with Bokma's sentence upon revocation, his request for relief, and the interplay ofMontana statutes. First, was Bokma 10/02/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0575originally sentenced under § 61-8-741,MCA? Second, how does the repeal ofthis statute

affect elapsed time credit? Lastly, is Bokma entitled to the application ofthe Montana Incentives and Interventions Grid (MIIG) prior torevocation? See §46-23-1015, MCA. We deem it appropriate torequire aresponse to hisPetition aswell as the issuesthat the Court raises. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that that the Attorney General or counsel for the Department of Correction is GRANTED thirty days from the date ofthis Order in which to prepare, file, and serve a written response together with appropriate documentary exhibits. TheClerk is directed toprovide a copy ofthis Orderto counsel ofrecord and toBill B. Bokma personally. 

## 61

0 n DATED this I— day ofOctober, 2024.
EXHIBIT 32.2


    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection  with the annual  report of The Robert  Mondavi  Corporation  (the
Company)  on Form  10-K  for the year  ended  June  30,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Henry J.
Salvo, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (3)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations  of the  Company  as of the dates and for the  periods
               expressed in the Report.

                                   Date:    SEPTEMBER 10, 2004
                                   ------------------------------------------


                                            /s/ HENRY J. SALVO, JR.
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                            Henry J. Salvo, Jr.
                                            Executive Vice President / CFO

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.





                       The Robert Mondavi Corporation 47
§ 27.395 Control system. ( a ) The part of each control system from the pilot's controls to the control stops must be designed to withstand pilot forces of not less than— ( 1 ) The forces specified in § 27.397; or
( 2 ) If the system prevents the pilot from applying the limit pilot forces to the system, the maximum forces that the system allows the pilot to apply, but not less than 0.60 times the forces specified in § 27.397.
( b ) Each primary control system, including its supporting structure, must be designed as follows: ( 1 ) The system must withstand loads resulting from the limit pilot forces prescribed in § 27.397.
( 2 ) Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(3) of this section, when power-operated actuator controls or power boost controls are used, the system must also withstand the loads resulting from the force output of each normally energized power device, including any single power boost or actuator system failure.
( 3 ) If the system design or the normal operating loads are such that a part of the system cannot react to the limit pilot forces prescribed in § 27.397, that part of the system must be designed to withstand the maximum loads that can be obtained in normal operation. The minimum design loads must, in any case, provide a rugged system for service use, including consideration of fatigue, jamming, ground gusts, control inertia, and friction loads. In the absence of rational analysis, the design loads resulting from 0.60 of the specified limit pilot forces are acceptable minimum design loads.
( 4 ) If operational loads may be exceeded through jamming, ground gusts, control inertia, or friction, the system must withstand the limit pilot forces specified in § 27.397, without yielding.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 7999, Mar. 6, 1990]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RAMEZ ZIADEH, ACTING SECRETARY OF

THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AND ACTING

CHAIRPERSON OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD

v.

PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE BUREAU, VINCENT C. DELIBERATO, JR., DIRECTOR OF THE LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE BUREAU, AND AMY J. MENDELSOHN, DIRECTOR OF

THE PENNSYLVANIA CODE AND

BULLETIN

APPEAL OF: CONSTELLATION ENERGY

CORPORATION AND CONS TELLATION ENERGY GENERATION, LLP,

Possible Intervenors :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 81 MAP 2022

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12 th day of October , 2022

, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED

.

See In re Barnes Foundation , 871 A.2d 792, 794 (Pa. 2005) ( “Pennsylvania law does

allow for an appeal as of right from an order denying intervention in circumstances that

meet the requirements of the collateral order doctrine .”); Geniv iv a v. Frisk , 725 A.2d 1209,

1214 (Pa. 1999) (explaining that, for a right to be too important to be denied review for

purposes of the collateral order doctrine, the right must be “ deeply rooted in public policy

going beyond the particular litigation at hand ”).

The Combined Application to Consolida te and Expedite Appeals is DISMISSED

as moot.
SORROW, LOW IAN90M

V.

HARRIS, COi

MMMMJtm gg&Ui MMBZ M ft*

Tp$uPH€fi\£M7 IM WGMJk.

FILED IN

14thCOURT OFAPPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

«AHfe2-22D15

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK

•MC4t+* *f&XA« AvJ*S jfAflfitttli A»»<e«/v«* 3^,f<<0/^W*

Ji$$& *£uei:c<*i &Vf*Nc"f CouXT (CltAk) ChfiiS Dov'el i& f?0* - /3<a/?<? ee/rti-Cy &Ktdf -Cite \aj Jk& appiitUie €o%jA"i iU? <©7 *

Man*** <?t>& Appe&l k*J b*#*> -£*te*} •*- **&«• /flk£*>ua4«/ Ap/a*J% ^AppeMc***'? h«s *i&i fret, it *»e± *~ X/?m #^«d 4*'J•/ e>4* fUe

CoHfii- *to Aedeve aU clocks*fASTcdt'o/v h^-tLe oppeffa^i«wcl

/<?A 4 f^«V<* vi' f, £#) >*** spv#de*tts Ptfopo&d fr«etfAr§s ofAdi a*fel

'Jji P/**idi'AHp $htk\'fa&&*']«t%,:'&• &Y*J'$$i--<&y:M&*&'*i%. 9# Mate**
&eed% -fo he p«fA a-C Appemt -€*>& Review,

AH of "the &ho*e me/A'*6#ecl /yus\m«»\\a^d docu/^^v*

Atevea he*£o&e a***///®*>ed, u^o^^i#*bte hyiL&#}&€tAss%

tfAjk*&«>A)^tWA* 7&/*/Codi*Ti&t/cl &K$f$iecf i#'i-k*

0/^fAieJ ~€floA« alt ftf*V It&Md Afpeil&AvL G&ceaiXi, Se~

iofue M&Cpudi o-£ fyppe*\% l*t //ovsios ,7e*c$ /*/ VA*

coupes o^ 7*/*f £^«-f CM€#$7*i7tt &»d Appe//ci<L

ccrtfr v«^$
£WeM>, /f-Ztr-Olo^-CZ

Pfe&se- -C'Vc -Co^ o.ppe//eA^ &&<lo/z_cJ /?ei//eu3

/^f^-J^

/

t,C,fi'/^ | fi£3
ate &; f*»t&QlO*J-CA

£)e<*ii C-U&;&t0pl<e/t "&&»''0*> ' Cfa<tk\

c.t.tf^ >o^3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP00-260-000]

Take notice that on April 28, 2000, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the filing, with an effective date of June 1, 2000. 

Texas Gas states that the proposed general rate case changes would increase revenues from jurisdictional transportation services by approximately $81 million, based on the twelve-month period ended January 31, 2000, as adjusted, compared with the underlying rates. 

Texas Gas states that the adjustments in rates are attributable to: 

(1) An increase in the utility rate base; 

(2) Increases in depreciation expense; 

(3) Increase in rate of return and related taxes; and 

(4) Revised system rate design quantities. 

Texas Gas further states that it has served copies of this filing upon the company's jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions. 

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 

David P. Boegers, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-11490  Filed 5-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4217 

To amend the Small Business Act to include hospitals serving rural areas 

or areas of persistent poverty in the paycheck protection program, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2020 

Mr. WICKER (for himself, Ms. SMITH, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, and Mr. JONES) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to include hospitals serving rural areas or areas of persistent poverty in the 

paycheck protection program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PPP Access for Rural 

5 Hospitals Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF CRITICAL CARE HOSPITALS IN THE 

7 PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM. 

8 (a) ELIGIBILITY OF HOSPITALS WITH MORE THAN

9 ONE PHYSICAL LOCATION.—Section 7(a)(36)(D)(iii) of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4217 IS

1 the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)(D)(iii)) is 

2 amended by striking ‘‘beginning with 72’’ and inserting 

3 the following: ‘‘beginning with 72 (or, in the case of a crit4 ical care hospital, is assigned a North American Industry 

5 Classification System code beginning with 62)’’. 

6 (b) WAIVER OF AFFILIATION RULES.—Section 

7 7(a)(36)(D)(iv)(I) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

8 636(a)(36)(D)(iv)(I)) is amended by striking ‘‘beginning 

9 with 72’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘beginning with 72 

10 (or, in the case of a critical care hospital, is assigned a 

11 North American Industry Classification System code be12 ginning with 62)’’. 

13 (c) CRITICAL CARE HOSPITALS DEFINED.—Section 

14 7(a)(36)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

15 636(a)(36)(D)) is amended by adding at the end the fol16 lowing: 

17 ‘‘(vii) CRITICAL CARE HOSPITAL DE18 FINED.—In this subparagraph, the term 

19 ‘critical care hospital’ means— 

20 ‘‘(I) a hospital (as defined in sec21 tion 1861(e) of the Social Security 

22 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(e))) that— 

23 ‘‘(aa) is located in a county 

24 (or equivalent unit of local gov25 ernment) in a rural area, as deVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:05 Jul 25, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4217.IS S4217

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4217 IS

1 fined in section 1886(d)(2)(D) of 

2 such Act (42 U.S.C. 

3 1395ww(d)(2)(D)); 

4 ‘‘(bb) is treated as being lo5 cated in a rural area pursuant to 

6 section 1886(d)(8)(E) of such 

7 Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1395ww(d)(8)(E)); or 

9 ‘‘(cc) for the most recent 

10 cost reporting period under sec11 tion 1886(d) of such Act (42 

12 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)), received an 

13 additional payment under section 

14 1886(d)(5)(F) of such Act (42 

15 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(F)); and 

16 ‘‘(II) a nonprofit or public crit17 ical access hospital, as defined in sec18 tion 1861(mm)(1) of the Social Secu19 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(mm)(1)).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### § 25.959 Unusable fuel supply.

The unusable fuel quantity for each fuel tank and its fuel system components must be established at not less than the quantity at which the first evidence of engine malfunction occurs under the most adverse fuel feed condition for all intended operations and flight maneuvers involving fuel feeding from that tank. Fuel system component failures need not be considered.

[Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5677, Apr. 8, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 25-40, 42 FR 15043, Mar. 17, 1977]
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<Table>
<Caption>
NAME                                           JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
------------------------------------           --------------------------------
<S>                                            <C>
Entevo Corporation                             Delaware
Curasoft, Inc.                                 California
BindView Development International             Delaware
BindView Development GMBH                      Germany
Netect Ltd.                                    Israel
Netect Inc                                     Delaware
BindView UK Ltd.                               United Kingdom
BindView Australia PTY Limited                 Australia
BindView SARL                                  France
BindView India                                 India
BindView do Brasil Limitada                    Brasil
</Table>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4065 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government to regulate 

the labeling of products made in the United States and introduced 

in interstate or foreign commerce, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2020 

Mr. LEE (for himself and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government 

to regulate the labeling of products made in the United 

States and introduced in interstate or foreign commerce, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reinforcing American5 Made Products Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4065 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSIVITY OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY TO REGU2 LATE LABELING OF PRODUCTS MADE IN THE 

3 UNITED STATES AND INTRODUCED IN INTER4 STATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE. 

5 Section 320933 of the Violent Crime Control and 

6 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 45a) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘To the ex9 tent’’ and inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—To the extent’’; 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) EFFECT ON STATE LAW.— 

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para14 graph (2), the provisions of this section shall super15 sede any provisions of the law of any State expressly 

16 relating to the extent to which a product is intro17 duced, delivered for introduction, sold, advertised, or 

18 offered for sale in interstate or foreign commerce 

19 with a ‘Made in the U.S.A.’ or ‘Made in America’ 

20 label, or the equivalent thereof, in order to represent 

21 that such product was in whole or substantial part 

22 of domestic origin. 

23 ‘‘(2) ENFORCEMENT.—Nothing in this section 

24 shall preclude the application of the law of any State 

25 to the use of a label not in compliance with sub26 section (a).’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4065 IS

1 (3) in the third sentence of subsection (a), as 

2 so designated by paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Noth3 ing in this section’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as pro4 vided in subsection (b), nothing in this section’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         January 26, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         6100 Executive Blvd., DSR  Conf. Rm., Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hameed Khan, PHD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and  Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 10, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-1131 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 25.1197 Fire extinguishing agents. ( a ) Fire extinguishing agents must— ( 1 ) Be capable of extinguishing flames emanating from any burning of fluids or other combustible materials in the area protected by the fire extinguishing system; and
( 2 ) Have thermal stability over the temperature range likely to be experienced in the compartment in which they are stored.
( b ) If any toxic extinguishing agent is used, provisions must be made to prevent harmful concentrations of fluid or fluid vapors (from leakage during normal operation of the airplane or as a result of discharging the fire extinguisher on the ground or in flight) from entering any personnel compartment, even though a defect may exist in the extinguishing system. This must be shown by test except for built-in carbon dioxide fuselage compartment fire extinguishing systems for which— ( 1 ) Five pounds or less of carbon dioxide will be discharged, under established fire control procedures, into any fuselage compartment; or
( 2 ) There is protective breathing equipment for each flight crewmember on flight deck duty.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-38, 41 FR 55467, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 25-40, 42 FR 15044, Mar. 17, 1977]
S TAT E OF MAI NE D E P A R T M E N T O F E NV IRO N M ENTA L PR OTECT ION

PAU L R . LEPAGE GO' ER N OR August 18 , 2015 David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch U.S. EPA Region 1-NE 5 Post Office Square Mail Code: OEP 05-2 Boston MA 02109-3912 Dear Mr. Conroy: P A TR ICIA W . AH O C O M M ISSIO N ER

On February 20 , 2008, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved amendments to Maine ' s State Implementation Plan (SIP) in the form of Chapter 141 Conformity of General Federal Actions. This Chapter controlled how Federal Actions within the State ofMaine would be evaluated with regards to the SIP. These amendments incorporated sections of the CFR by reference ; those sec tion s have since been repealed and further amendments to the CFR have made Chapter I41 unnecessary and redundant. The Department therefore repealed Chapter 141 and requests that EPA remove Chapter 141 from Maine 's SIP. I have attached a copy of our MAPA- 1 form as proof of adoptions and a copy of the public notice. The Department recei ved no substantive comments during the comment period ; as such there i s no response to comments included in this submission . lfyou have any questions , please contact Tom Graham of my staff at (207) 287-7598.



# a: **~~L** Marc Allen Robert Cone, Director Bureau of Air Quality

1 - :' ' 1 \T F l l <ll':;l · :; · 1

**\T <l~**  1116 II<H;

**\~** R <l • D . :;tTI'F (,

**312r:'.'-f'<lR<l**

**D** I :! . >Sr:F:-\ TI LII.DI U '

**F.~ \'\\** 

**', \'I'**  **'.Rf-:**Letter to David Conroy August 18, 2015 Page 2 of 2 Enclosure Cc: Patricia Aho, Conunissioner Anne Arnold (electronic copy) Donald Dahl (electronic copy)