alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated April 16, 2002, except for Note 3, which is
dated April 15, 2003, accompanying the consolidated financial statements
included in the Annual Report of CTI Industries Corporation and Subsidiaries on
Form 10-KSB for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
CTI Industries Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (Nos.333-76006 and
333-76008) and SB-2 (No. 333-31969).


/s/ Grant Thornton, LLP

Chicago, Illinois
April 29, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.1

WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.

February 9, 2010

Contango Oil & Gas Company

3700 Buffalo Speedway, Suite 960

Houston, Texas 77098



| | Re: | Contango Oil & Gas Company, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------

Gentlemen:

The firm of William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. consents to
the use of its name and to the use of its projections for Contango Oil & Gas Companys Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of February 9, 2010 in Contangos Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
2009.

William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. has no interests in Contango Oil & Gas Company or in any
affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with Contango Oil & Gas Company. Contango Oil & Gas Company does
not employ us on a contingent basis.

Yours very truly,



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
|                                  
|/s/ F.J. MAREK                    
|F.J. Marek, P.E.                  
|Senior Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3303] 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 (64 FR 56014), and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended by Delegation of Authority No. 236-1 of November 9, 1999, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibit, “Frida Kahlo, Diego Rivera, and Twentieth-Century Mexican Art: The Jacques and Natasha Gelman Collection,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with a foreign lender. I also determine that the temporary exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Contemporary Art, San Diego, CA, from on or about May 14, 2000, to on or about September 4, 2000, at the Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, TX, from on or about October 8, 2000, to on or about January 28, 2001, and at the Phoenix Art Museum, Phoenix, AZ, from on or about April 7, 2001 to on or about July, 1, 2001, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, 202/619-5997, and the address is Room 700, United States Department of State, 301 4th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: April 21, 2000. 

William B. Bader, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 00-10794 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
§ 25.701 Flap and slat interconnection. ( a ) Unless the airplane has safe flight characteristics with the flaps or slats retracted on one side and extended on the other, the motion of flaps or slats on opposite sides of the plane of symmetry must be synchronized by a mechanical interconnection or approved equivalent means.
( b ) If a wing flap or slat interconnection or equivalent means is used, it must be designed to account for the applicable unsymmetrical loads, including those resulting from flight with the engines on one side of the plane of symmetry inoperative and the remaining engines at takeoff power.
( c ) For airplanes with flaps or slats that are not subjected to slipstream conditions, the structure must be designed for the loads imposed when the wing flaps or slats on one side are carrying the most severe load occurring in the prescribed symmetrical conditions and those on the other side are carrying not more than 80 percent of that load.
( d ) The interconnection must be designed for the loads resulting when interconnected flap or slat surfaces on one side of the plane of symmetry are jammed and immovable while the surfaces on the other side are free to move and the full power of the surface actuating system is applied.
[Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29777, July 20, 1990]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 15, 2014. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 15, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15I0067. STEARNS BANK, N.A. v. SANDRA DOYLE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 13CI01402
VANJEVENTERBlACKLLP 

David P. Ferrell 

dferrell@vanblk.com 

www. vanblk.com 

434 Fayetteville Street • Suite 2000 ·Raleigh, NC 27601 • 0:919.754.1171 • F: 919.754.1317 

September 15, 2015 

U.S. Department ofTransportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Petition to Amend FAA Exemption No. 11508 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0434 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

The FAA recently granted the GSC Surveying, Inc. ("GSC") Exemption No. 11508 under 

Section 333 of the Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to allow its use of Small Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems ("UASs") in commercial operations with its clients, such as precision aerial 

surveys, including in the areas of construction, agriculture, mining, scientific studies, wildlife 

monitoring, forestry, and oil, power and gas industries. This petition is for an amendment to GSC's 

exemption, namely to operate an additional type of UAS. GSC would like to add the following 

UAS to our exemption: DJI Spreading Wings S900. 

The DJI Spreading Wings S900 ("S900") meets all ofthe criteria ofGSC's Exemption No. 

11508. The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the S900 in Exemption No. 12044 

(Shore Aerial Aviation Services, LLC). 

GSC will comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed by Exemption No. 

11508 and will update and maintain the technical manuals for the additional aircraft. There has 

been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the 

basis for granting the original exemption. 

We are prepared to modify or amend any part of this request to satisfy the need for an 

equivalent level of safety. Should you have any questions or require any additional information 

please contact the undersigned. Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Sincerely, 

VANDEVENTER BLACK LLP 

~f I 

.t··;.: ! ( 

David P. Ferrell 

Counsel for GSC Surveying, Inc. 

4812-2396-8550, v. I 

1 

Attorneys t\t Law Since 1883 VanBiacklaw.com
§ 25.343 Design fuel and oil loads. ( a ) The disposable load combinations must include each fuel and oil load in the range from zero fuel and oil to the selected maximum fuel and oil load. A structural reserve fuel condition, not exceeding 45 minutes of fuel under the operating conditions in § 25.1001(e) and (f), as applicable, may be selected.
( b ) If a structural reserve fuel condition is selected, it must be used as the minimum fuel weight condition for showing compliance with the flight load requirements as prescribed in this subpart. In addition— ( 1 ) The structure must be designed for a condition of zero fuel and oil in the wing at limit loads corresponding to— ( i ) A maneuvering load factor of + 2.25; and
( ii ) The gust and turbulence conditions of § 25.341(a) and (b), but assuming 85% of the gust velocities prescribed in § 25.341(a)(4) and 85% of the turbulence intensities prescribed in § 25.341(b)(3).
( 2 ) Fatigue evaluation of the structure must account for any increase in operating stresses resulting from the design condition of paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and
( 3 ) The flutter, deformation, and vibration requirements must also be met with zero fuel.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-18, 33 FR 12226, Aug. 30, 1968; Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 37607, Sept. 12, 1990; Amdt. 25-86, 61 FR 5221, Feb. 9, 1996; Amdt. 25-141, 79 FR 73468, Dec. 11, 2014]
City of 

ARKANSAS 

May 3, 2000 

Mr. James L. Tumer 

U. S. EPA, Region 6 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

VIA FACSIMILE 

(Original Mailed) 

RE: United States V. City of Jacksonville ' . 

United Stated Federal Court No. LR-C-94-196, 

Dear Mr. Tumer: 

1 am in receipt of your letters and telephone messages and apologize for the delay in 

responding. 1 have been in court, meetings, and depositions constantly for the past 

month. 

As I said in my phone message, we are having problems with the title search on the 

Rogers' Road property. The current owners' family name is not on the property, and 

tracking the other family fi-om 1983 forward has proven to be difficult. We are working 

toward resolution of the problem and will file the quiet fitle action as soon as possible. I 

will forward a copy to you upon its filing. 

If you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Sincerely, 

CITY OF JACKSONIVLLE, ARKANSAS 

BY: 

ROBER-^^E^AMBURG 

City Attomey 

9050357 

REB/hz 

III 

303 north James ^ P.O. Box 5913 #• Jack.sonvHle, Arkansas 72078 ^ (501) 982-6305 

002133
§ 29.1025 Oil valves. ( a ) Each oil shutoff must meet the requirements of § 29.1189.
( b ) The closing of oil shutoffs may not prevent autorotation.
( c ) Each oil valve must have positive stops or suitable index provisions in the “on” and “off” positions and must be supported so that no loads resulting from its operation or from accelerated flight conditions are transmitted to the lines attached to the valve.
EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, David O. Cole, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the periodic report, to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC upon request.







Date:  April 4, 2008

By:/s/ David O. Cole

David O. Cole

Chief Financial Officer
§ 17.23 Protest remedies. ( a ) The ODRA has broad discretion to recommend and impose protest remedies that are consistent with the AMS and applicable law. Such remedies may include, but are not limited to one or a combination of, the following: ( 1 ) Amend the SIR;
( 2 ) Refrain from exercising options under the contract;
( 3 ) Issue a new SIR;
( 4 ) Require a recompetition or revaluation;
( 5 ) Terminate an existing contract for the FAA's convenience;
( 6 ) Direct an award to the protester;
( 7 ) Award bid and proposal costs; or
( 8 ) Any other remedy consistent with the AMS that is appropriate under the circumstances.
( b ) In determining the appropriate recommendation, the ODRA may consider the circumstances surrounding the procurement or proposed procurement including, but not limited to: the nature of the procurement deficiency; the degree of prejudice to other parties or to the integrity of the acquisition system; the good faith of the parties; the extent of performance completed; the feasibility of any proposed remedy; the urgency of the procurement; the cost and impact of the recommended remedy; and the impact on the Agency's mission.
( c ) Attorney's fees of a prevailing protester are allowable to the extent permitted by the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(1) (EAJA) and 14 CFR part 14.
steam

_ record - Re: Milford Power Pro j ect - Plant ID 02542 - Request for Extension

Gree tings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely,

- From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. gov> To: Mike Cartney <mcartney@cpv.com> Date: 7/9/2010 12:25 PM Sub j ect: Re: Milford Power Project - Pl ant ID 02542 - R equest for Extension Pa g e 1 of 2

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C37152CDO

...
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eric J. Pulaski, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
of BindView Development Corporation (the "Company"), certify that (i) the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
the results of operations of the Company.

By /s/ ERIC J. PULASKI
   --------------------------------------
   Eric J. Pulaski
   Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
   Officer and President
   March 29, 2004

      A signed original of the foregoing certification has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
RECEIVERS.

[Hancock Circuit Court,

December Term, 1897.]

Day, Price and Norris, JJ.

#### France et al. v. Peerless Refining Co. et al.

Receiver having been Properly Appointed should not be Discharged upon Preliminary Motion, in Advance oe Trial, in Favor oe Assignee Appointed Elsewhere.

A court having appointed a receiver, upon a proper showing, it is error to discharge such receiver, upon a preliminary motion, in advance of a trial and disposition of the case on its merits, and relinquish possession of property to an assignee' subsequently appointed in another jurisdiction.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hancock county.

On a petition filed for that purpose, a receiver was duly appointed for the Peerless Refining Co., a corporation having its principal place of business at Findlay, Ohio, by a judge of the court of common pleas of Hancock county, at Chambers, on August 18, 1897. Such receiver at once qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties, was put in possession and control of the property and assets of the company, and was proceeding to administer his trust; when, on November 5, 1897, on motion of the defendant company to discharge such receiver, the court of common pleas, in advance of a trial of said cause on its merits, sustained the motion and ordered the discharge of such receiver, and that he turn over all the property and assets of such company in his possession, as such receiver, to an assignee appointed by the probate court of Cuyahoga county, subsequent to the appointment and possession of such receiver.

Per Curiam.

Regarding the ■ petition as an application for the appointment of a receiver, the facts stated therein, showing insolvency of the corporation, frauds and mismanagement of its board of directors and managers, to *262the detriment, present and prospective, of the corporation, its stockholders and creditors, justified the appointment of the receiver for the purposes specified in the order of appointment; and the receiver having qualified and entered upon the trust by being put in possession of the property and assets, and proceeded in execution of the order of appointment, the matter was within the grasp of the law for all proper purposes appearing upon a trial of the case on its merits; and, under the averments of the petition, and the facts appearing, it was error, for the court, on a preliminary motion, in advance of such trial and disposition of the case on its merits, to discharge the receiver and relinquish the possession of the property and assets received by him, to an assignee subsequently appointed in another jurisdiction.

*Thomas Meehan*and *Elijah T.*Dunn, for plaintiff in error.

*Ross &*Kinder, and *Judge*Blandin, for defendants.

The order of discharge is reversed, with costs.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 30
Elevation, in feet
;- 180
3
NWUANW',
Sec. 3, T. 275.,R. 25 E.
O 900 1800 cpm
West
1 2 L160
NWYSW, NEYNEY Eost
Sec. 6, T. 275., R. 25 E. Sec. 8, T. 275., R. 25 E 6
NJ
© 900 1800 com $0 com x 4 NEYNWY4
z ae New Sec. 12, T. 275., R. 25 E. 5 Sec. 7, T. 275., R. 27 E.
\
x ©__900 1800 2700 SWYSWA 0900
= al Sec. 3, T. 275. R. 26E. -
200 1800 epm L140
Ze
2
88
e
BE
45
Red and white mottles a
clayey sand
L120
¢
2
oS
w L100
28
af
2
EXPLANATION &
Lithologic symbols Other symbols Smear 900 cpm
Lithologic correlation ia
sa Stratigraphic correlation
jean 80
Limits of aluminum ond
ikon Ceniaatationlor: calcium phosphate zones
ron coer i bi F
Sharer Alternating symbols indicate two or Sealeliniieet
three of the above correlations 2
follow the same line
Clay
r{ 5
UPPER (?) TO
Phosphate nodules Section of core from which fossils MIDDLE MIOCENE
were identified ( 10 Unnamed sand and limestone
> L6o
Calcareous clay a | MIDDLE MIOCENE
Somple number and interval sampled Trace of gamma-ray log showing oP Hawthorn formation
from lot 2546 intensity of radiation; cpm = “ .
Limestone counts per minute 20

No recovery, core lost

A mixture of symbols indicates <
a mixed lithology

EOCENE — Ocala limestone

CROSS SECTION 15, LAND-PEBBLE PHOSPHATE DISTRICT, FLORIDA

466352 0 59 (In pocket)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               46,539
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    762,164
<PP&E>                                               31,255
<DEPRECIATION>                                        6,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      786,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,306,400
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                              56
<COMMON>                                              4,050
<OTHER-SE>                                         (523,543)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        786,963
<SALES>                                              13,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     13,700
<CGS>                                               452,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       452,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,374,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   73,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,887,371)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,887,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,887,371)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.54)



</TABLE>
§ 1204.1507 Communicating with State and local officials concerning the Agency's programs and activities. ( a ) For those programs and activities covered by a state process under § 1204.1506 the Administrator, to the extent permitted by law: ( 1 ) Uses the official state process to determine views of state and local elected officials; and;
( 2 ) Communicates with state and local elected officials, through the official state process, as early in a program planning cycle as is reasonably feasible to explain specific plans and actions.
( b ) The Administrator provides notice to directly affected state, areawide, regional, and local entities in a state of proposed direct Federal development if: ( 1 ) The state has not adopted a process under the Order; or
( 2 ) The development involves a program or activity not selected for the state process.
This notice may be made by publication in a periodical of general circulation in the area likely to be affected or other appropriate means, which the Agency in its discretion deems appropriate.