alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4005 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to address claims of the United 

States Government relating to care received by civilians at military medical treatment facilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2020 

Ms. WARREN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to address claims 

of the United States Government relating to care received by civilians at military medical treatment facilities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Relief for 

5 Civilians Treated at Military Hospitals Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4005 IS

1 SEC. 2. DEBT ARISING FROM TREATMENT AT MILITARY 

2 MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITIES. 

3 Section 3711 of title 31, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (g)(2)— 

6 (A) in subparagraph (A)(v), by striking 

7 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

8 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

9 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(C) to any debt or claim described in sub12 section (j).’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(j) The Secretary of Defense may not take an action 

15 under subsection (a), and shall suspend or terminate an 

16 action by the Secretary of a military department under 

17 that subsection, to collect a claim arising from care pro18 vided at a military medical treatment facility to a civilian 

19 who is not a covered beneficiary (as that term is defined 

20 in section 1072 of title 10).’’. 

21 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON FEES CHARGED TO CIVILIANS FOR 

22 EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT PRO23 VIDED AT MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT 

24 FACILITIES. 

25 Section 1079b of title 10, United States Code, is 

26 amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4005 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub2 section (c); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol4 lowing new subsection (b): 

5 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION ON FEES FOR CERTAIN TREAT6 MENT.—(1) Under the procedures developed under sub7 section (a), a military medical treatment facility may not 

8 charge a civilian who is not a covered beneficiary any fee 

9 for covered treatment provided to the civilian at the facil10 ity. 

11 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘covered treatment’, 

12 with respect to treatment provided to a civilian at a mili13 tary medical treatment facility, means emergency medical 

14 treatment that can be provided only at the military med15 ical treatment facility due to the severity of the condition 

16 of the civilian and the location of the civilian.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23**

 

# **Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

Aksys, Ltd.:

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-76142,333-44668, 333-36674, 333-89188, 333-97763, 333-100557, 333-102651 and333-114396) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-64134, 333-64136, and 333-18073) on FormS-8 of Aksys, Ltd. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 16, 2005relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Aksys, Ltd. and subsidiaries asof December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2004, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over the financial reporting as of December31, 2004, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting asof December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004annual report on Form 10-K of Aksys, Ltd.

 

 
| KPMG LLP             |
|----------------------|
|                 |
|                 |
| Chicago,  Illinois   |
| March 16,  2005 |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 
 SECTION 906 CEO CERTIFICATION
 
 Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of
 Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
 
 I, John E. Elliott, II, the Chief Executive Officer of Critical Home Care, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Critical Home Care, Inc.
 
 /s/ John E. Elliott, IIChairman andChief Executive Officer Dated: January 12, 2005
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Critical Home Care, Inc. The statement will be retained by Critical Home Care, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4065 

AN ACT 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government 

to regulate the labeling of products made in the United 

States and introduced in interstate or foreign commerce, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4065 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reinforcing American3 Made Products Act of 2020’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXCLUSIVITY OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY TO REGU5 LATE LABELING OF PRODUCTS MADE IN THE 

6 UNITED STATES AND INTRODUCED IN INTER7 STATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE. 

8 Section 320933 of the Violent Crime Control and 

9 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 45a) is amend10 ed— 

11 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘To the ex12 tent’’ and inserting the following: 

13 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—To the extent’’; 

14 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(b) EFFECT ON STATE LAW.— 

16 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para17 graph (2), the provisions of this section shall super18 sede any provisions of the law of any State expressly 

19 relating to the extent to which a product is intro20 duced, delivered for introduction, sold, advertised, or 

21 offered for sale in interstate or foreign commerce 

22 with a ‘Made in the U.S.A.’ or ‘Made in America’ 

23 label, or the equivalent thereof, in order to represent 

24 that such product was in whole or substantial part 

25 of domestic origin. 
3 

†S 4065 ES

1 ‘‘(2) ENFORCEMENT.—Nothing in this section 

2 shall preclude the application of the law of any State 

3 to the use of a label not in compliance with sub4 section (a).’’; and 

5 (3) in the third sentence of subsection (a), as 

6 so designated by paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Noth7 ing in this section’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as pro8 vided in subsection (b), nothing in this section’’. 

Passed the Senate July 22, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4065 

AN ACT 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal 

purposes. interstate or foreign commerce, and for other made in the United States and introduced in Government to regulate the labeling of products
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF JULY 5 , 2016

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ------------------------------------------------------------------

WD79147 Anita G. Lewis vs. Gabrielle Elledge

- Levota

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ---------------------------------------------------- ------------ --

WD 78740 State of Missouri vs. Michael N. Werneke
#### § 25.781 Cockpit control knob shape.

Cockpit control knobs must conform to the general shapes (but not necessarily the exact sizes or specific proportions) in the following figure:

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC28SE91.048/EC28SE91.048_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC28SE91.048/EC28SE91.048_original_size.png)

[Doc. No. 5066, [29 FR 18291](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/29-FR-18291), Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-72, [55 FR 29779](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/55-FR-29779), July 20, 1990]
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

REBECCA E. CHEW, formerly known as 

REBECCA E. LOPEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNPUBLISHED

April 25, 2024

v No. 366641

Clinton Circuit Court

JOSEPH P. LOPEZ, LC No. 21-030034-DO

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: M. J. KELLY, P.J., and JANSEN and MURRAY, JJ.

MURRAY, J. (dissenting).

I would affirm the trial court’s order granting defendant $2,500 in attorney fees. I have 

no objection to the law recounted by the majority, as this Court has clearly indicated that when a

trial court fails to follow the Smith/Pirgu1process and does not apply the relevant factors, it errs.

Powers v Brown, 328 Mich App 617, 623-624; 939 NW2d 733 (2019). But that doesn’t address 

the problem underlying defendant’s appeal. As I see it, defendant failed to come close to carrying 

his burden of proof. In fact, he submitted no evidence at the evidentiary hearing regarding the

work any fees covered, how many hours were expended, and the hourly rate paid. And, the burden 

of proof rested squarely on him as the party requesting attorney fees. Smith v Khouri, 481 Mich 

519, 528-529; 751 NW2d 472 (2008).

The court may only award reasonable fees, not actual fees, Smith, 481 Mich at 528 n 12, 

and because the fees sought2 were objected to by plaintiff, the court appropriately conducted an 

evidentiary hearing, Miller v Meijer, Inc, 219 Mich App 476, 479; 556 NW2d 890 (1996). But at 

 

1

Smith v Khouri, 481 Mich 519, 528 n 12; 751 NW2d 472 (2008), and Pirgu v United Servs Auto 

Ass’n, 499 Mich 269, 274; 884 NW2d 257 (2016). 

2 Defendant’s brief had a blank space for insertion of the amount requested, and in the conclusion 

he only asked for a reasonable and actual attorney fee. Thus, in essence, defendant never specified 

in his brief what amount of fees he sought.
-2-

that hearing, defendant did not submit any evidence regarding any actual fees or reasonable fees 

incurred. Although defendant did submit some billings and an affidavit with the motion, as the 

trial court noted, defendant never moved to admit any of that into evidence during the evidentiary 

hearing. Consequently, there was no evidence in the record (from defendant) on the actual or 

reasonable fees sought. So, although the trial court is to consider the amount of fees requested, In 

re Martin (After Remand), 205 Mich App 96, 109; 517 NW2d 749 (1994), rev’d on other grounds 

450 Mich 204 (1995), as well as the professional standing and experience of the attorney, the time 

and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, the skill required to 

perform the legal service properly, and the expenses incurred, see Smith, 481 Mich at 529; MRPC 

1.5(a), it could not do so when defendant—the party with the burden of proof—failed to submit 

any evidence regarding the reasonable fees incurred. I would affirm. 

/s/ Christopher M. Murray
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

PROMESA

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND Title III

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as a representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al. (Jointly Administered)

Debtors

 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

NOW comes creditors CARMEN LYDIA RÍOS ARROYO, PABLO JUAN RÍOS 

ARROYO, ELENA MARIE MARRERO RÍOS by herself and in representation of her sons: 

DEBORAH MARIE SANTANA MARRERO and ERICK JOEL SANTANA MARRERO (these 

last ones also appear by themselves), LORNA LEE MARRERO RÍOS by herself and in 

representation of her daughter DARIANA LIZ MARREROMARRERO (this last one is also 

appearing by herself), ELENA ARROYO VÁZQUEZ, all represented by the undersigned attorney,

to state as follows.

That pursuant to provisions of Rule 9010(b) of Bankruptcy Procedure, the appearing party 

notifies that it has retained the legal services of Osvaldo Toledo Martinez whose address is:

Osvaldo Toledo Martínez

PO Box 190938

San Juan PR 00919-0938

E-Mail: toledo.bankruptcy@gmail.com

Telephone No.: (787) 756-6395

Fax No.: (787) 767-7965

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3371 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 05:05:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE, the appearing party respectfully prays that the Clerk of the Court takes notice of 

the appearance of the undersigned attorney and to notify him of all the proceedings in this case, 

including but not limited to copies of the petition, schedules, motions, and statements filed or to be filed 

in the above-referenced case and further prays that the name and address be added to the Master 

Address List kept in the above-captioned case.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and exact copy of the foregoing was filed electronically with 

the clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which in turn will send notification of such filing to all 

interested parties of record.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

At San Juan, Puerto Rico, this June 29, 2018.

/S/ Osvaldo Toledo Martínez

OSVALDO TOLEDO MARTÍNEZ, ESQ.

USDC No. 127905

PO Box 190938

San Juan PR 00919-0938

Tel: (787) 756-6395

Fax: (787) 767-7965

E-Mail: toledo.bankruptcy@gmail.com

Counsel for Creditors

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3371 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 05:05:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Ms. Aloha ley 

Associate Director 

Small Community Program 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE W86-310 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Ms. ley: 

As chair of the Walla Walla County Board of Commissioners, and speaking on behalf of the entire Board, we 

strongly support the air service proposal to enhance passenger services to the Walla Walla Regional Airport 

detailed in the Small Community Air Service Development Program grant application. The Walla Walla Regional 

Airport plays an important role in providing support to business, government, education, and leisure travel to 

and from our community. The $250,000 federal request would be coupled with $50,000 raised from our 

community to provide critical funding for a series of marketing initiatives to build both inbound and outbound 

traffic. We are confident that• this grant can make a significant difference for the future of commercial air 

service in the Walla Walla Valley. 

Our community currently faces a very serious problem with the possible elimination of service with Alaska 

Airlines. The loss of air service would be a devastating blow to our economy and the many sectors that rely on 

it for conducting and building their business in our valley. When flying on county business, it is by far more 

efficient for us and our employees to be able to fly out of the Walla Walla Airport, and we depend on that. 

We greatly appreciate your serious review of the Port of Walla Walla's grant application. Please help us mal<e a 

difference in our community. If you wish to further discuss the merits of the application or commercial air 

service in Walla Walla, feel free to contact this office at 509/524-2505. 

Thank you in advance for your attention to this important matter. 

Sinwely, tJ' 1, . b:,Tompki~ Boart of County Commissioners 

WALL\ \\~\U.A COli:\''l'l' I"UIIUC UE,\LTII A.''\ I) I.H:ISI.XI'I\'1; IIUJLDI!I;G- :314 WEST ~I AI:\' 

P.O. BOX l.'SOH • WAI .1.,\ \\':\C.L\.. U~\SIIJS(!TOX .f:IU:J6:!"0:U6 • .,,,,.<.'C»~On)lllis..~ioncr~@l·o.wnlla·wnll.;t.\\'~i.il"i 

l'HOl'•,"l~: (,')()H) -'i.:l4-~1()5 • JtAX: (1)UU) ~.2 f.e,_'j J2 

llislricl :-i/o. 1 

.IAMI::S K .. JOUNSON 

Dlstdt•l l\'n. 2 

PERRY L. DOZII<:R 

Di•to·ic·t No. 3 

CRF:GORY A. TO.\iPKJ!\'S
Pedro Joel Landrau <pjlandrau@gmail.com>

Javier Pérez Rivera v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, C DP2016-0070 (402)

Pedro Joel Landrau <pjlandrau@gmail.com> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:15 AM

To: Claudia Juan Garcia <cjuan@justicia.pr.gov>

[Quoted text hidden]

Regarding your determination, we request a reconsideration. The case already as an arbitral award in favor of Ms. Javier

Pérez ordering his reinstallment in his job and back pay and a lift of stay of Judge Swain os the arbitration. Therefore the

case is in a very advanced stage. Please clarify if your position is to object Mr. Perez reinstallment under stay grounds.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2803-3 Filed:03/26/18 Entered:03/26/18 10:53:41 Desc:

Exhibit email January 21 2018 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.1: AMENDED UNDERWRITING AGENCY AGREEMENTS



 


Exhibit 10.1


Amendments to Underwriting Agency Agreement between Allied World Assurance
Company Ltd and IPCUSL


 






 


AMENDMENT NO. 1



TO



UNDERWRITING AGENCY AGREEMENT

DATED DECEMBER 1, 2001



WHEREAS, Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd and IPCRe Underwriting Services
Ltd. had entered into an Underwriting Agency Agreement dated as of December 1,
2001;


NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed, that the Section 13.1 of the Underwriting Agency
Agreement be deleted and replaced with the following:



	 	 	 	13.1 The term of this Agreement shall commence on December 1, 2001
and shall continue in force until December 2, 2004 (the “Initial
Term”). On December 1, 2002 the Initial Term of this Agreement
shall be extended by the period of one year, and thereafter, on
December 1st of each successive year, the term of the agreement
shall be further extended by one year unless prior written notice
to terminate shall have been delivered by one party to the other
party at least 90 days prior to December 1st of any given year.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 1
to the UNDERWRITING AGENCY AGREEMENT as of February 21, 2003.



	 	 	 
	For and on behalf of	 	
For and on behalf of
	IPCRe Underwriting Services Ltd.	 	
Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd
	 	 	 
	/s/ James P. Bryce	 	
/s/ L.M. Murphy
	
	 	


	James P. Bryce	 	
L. Michael Murphy
	President and CEO	 	
Vice President and Secretary



 






 



AMENDMENT NO. 2



TO



UNDERWRITING AGENCY AGREEMENT

DATED DECEMBER 1, 2001, AS AMENDED



WHEREAS, Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd and IPCRe Underwriting Services
Ltd. had entered into an Underwriting Agency Agreement dated as of December 1,
2001 and amended on February 21, 2003;


WHEREAS, Section 2.2 C of the Underwriting Agency Agreement the Zonal Limit is
established at $200 million;


WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to increase the Zonal Limit to $225 million.


NOW, THEREFORE IT IS AGREED that Section 2.2 C of the Underwriting Agency
Agreement be amended to increase the Zonal Limit to “$225 million per zone;”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 2
to the UNDERWRITING AGENCY AGREEMENT as of March 28, 2003.



	 	 	 
	For and on behalf of	 	
For and on behalf of
	IPCRe Underwriting Services Ltd.	 	
Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd
	 	 	 
	/s/ James P. Bryce	 	
/s/ L.M. Murphy
	
	 	


	James P. Bryce	 	
L. Michael Murphy
	President and CEO	 	
Vice President and Secretary
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3755

To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to insure 

zero-downpayment mortgages for one-unit residences. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2004

Mr. TIBERI (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. NEY, Mr. 

TURNER of Ohio, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. 

RENZI, Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky, and Mr. CLAY) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to insure zero-downpayment mortgages for oneunit residences.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Zero Downpayment 

5 Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INSURANCE FOR ZERO-DOWNPAYMENT MORT7 GAGES. 

8 The National Housing Act is amended as follows: 
2

•HR 3755 IH 

1 (1) MORTGAGE INSURANCE AUTHORITY.—In 

2 Section 203 (12 U.S.C. 1709) by adding at the end 

3 the following new subsection: 

4 ‘‘(y) ZERO-DOWNPAYMENT MORTGAGES.—Notwith5 standing any other provision of this section or any other 

6 section of this title, the Secretary is authorized to insure, 

7 and to commit to insure, any mortgage involving a prop8 erty upon which there is located a dwelling designed prin9 cipally for a 1-family residence which (1) involves a prin10 cipal obligation not in excess of 100 percent of the applica11 ble maximum dollar amount limit under subsection 

12 (b)(2)(A) for a one-unit dwelling, and (2) is not in excess 

13 of 100 percent of the appraised value of the property plus 

14 any initial service charges, appraisal, inspection, and other 

15 fees in connection with the mortgage as approved by the 

16 Secretary. The Secretary is authorized to establish any ad17 ditional requirements as may be necessary, or appropriate, 

18 including requirements regarding mortgagor and property 

19 eligibility.’’. 

20 (2) GENERAL INSURANCE FUND.—In section 

21 519(e) (12 U.S.C. 1735c(e)), by striking ‘‘and 

22 203(i)’’ and inserting ‘‘, 203(i), and 203(y)’’.

Æ
§ 25.1725 Powerplants: EWIS. ( a ) EWIS associated with any powerplant must be designed and installed so that the failure of an EWIS component will not prevent the continued safe operation of the remaining powerplants or require immediate action by any crewmember for continued safe operation, in accordance with the requirements of § 25.903(b).
( b ) Design precautions must be taken to minimize hazards to the airplane due to EWIS damage in the event of a powerplant rotor failure or a fire originating within the powerplant that burns through the powerplant case, in accordance with the requirements of § 25.903(d)(1).
Editorial Note on Part 745
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 745 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 745.201 Processing of insurance claims. ( a ) *Delegations of authority.* The Agent for the Liquidating Agent (“Liquidating Agent”) or his or her designee is authorized to make initial determinations with respect to insurance claims pursuant to the principles set forth in this part, and to act on requests for reconsideration of the initial determination.
( b ) *Initial determination.* In the event the Liquidating Agent determines that all or a portion of an accountholder's account is uninsured, the Liquidating Agent shall so notify the accountholder in writing, stating the reason(s) for such initial determination, and shall provide the accountholder with a certificate of claim in liquidation in the amount of the uninsured account from the Board in its capacity as Liquidating Agent for the insured credit union to enable the accountholder to share in the proceeds of the liquidation of the credit union, if any, up to the amount of the uninsured account.
( c ) *Reconsideration and appeals.* An accountholder may request reconsideration from the Liquidating Agent of the initial determination and/or file an appeal with the NCUA Board in accordance with the procedures set forth in subpart B to part 746 of this chapter.
[55 FR 5586, Feb. 16, 1990, as amended at 82 FR 50294, Oct. 30, 2017]
§ 23.2245 Aeroelasticity. ( a ) The airplane must be free from flutter, control reversal, and divergence— ( 1 ) At all speeds within and sufficiently beyond the structural design envelope;
( 2 ) For any configuration and condition of operation;
( 3 ) Accounting for critical degrees of freedom; and
( 4 ) Accounting for any critical failures or malfunctions.
( b ) The applicant must establish tolerances for all quantities that affect flutter.