# Final Effluent Pond Sludge Sampling 

# and Analysis Plan



# BWX Technologies, Inc. 

# Mt. Athos Site Lynchburg, Virginia

Prepared by:



## BVVXTechnologies, 

# Inc.



# November 2004

KN4\BWX'AFEP\SAP\Exh 7\11-O4\FEP SAP COV-11-4-04.d0~\11/8/2004\4:33 PM

## BWXT 

# - FEP 

## Delisting Petition 1

## 1/8/04


# EXHIBIT 7 

# FINAL EFFLUENT POND SLUDGE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
I. Overview
To provide a comprehensive sludge sampling strategy for the Final Effluent Ponds (FEP), a twophase sampling plan is proposed. Phase 1will collect sludge from four representative locations in each pond and analyze the samples for the comprehensive list of chemical compounds and other analytical parameters shown in Table 1. The analytical parameter list includes the 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 264 Appendix IX (Groundwater Monitoring List) analytes for the metal, volatile organic compound 

## (VOC), semivolatile organic compound, polychlorinated biphenyl, and dioxidfuran groups. Excluded from the analyte list because ofprocess knowledge are the herbicide and pesticide groupings of compounds. Three additional compounds from the 40 CFR Appendix VIII (Hazardous Constituent List) are included based on process knowledge: dibutyl phthalate, acetone, and formaldehyde. Other analytical parameters will include total oil and grease, fluoride, cyanide, total sulfide, water content, corrosivity, and ignitability. The Phase 1testing will include analyses for both (a) total concentrations and (b) 

## toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)-extractableconcentrations. Past sampling of the sludges has shown them to have ahigh water content. Therefore, chemical concentrations will be reported on a wet-weight basis. Sludge water content will alsobe analyzed and reported. For total concentration analyses, the sludge samples will be prepared and analyzed as a solid matrix. In addition to the standard TCLP extraction, one Phase I sample from each pond will be subjected to extract testing at two additionalpH values. The multiple pH extract testing will follow the recommendations in the EPA 

## RCRA DelistingProgram, Guidance Manualfor 

## the Petitioner, March 2000. Besides the standard extract described in TCLP Method 13

## 11, the sludge will be extracted at two other pH values and analyzed. The two alternate extract fluids will be:
Distilled deionized (DI) water 

## (pH 7) An alkaline solution of sodium bicarbonate and sodium carbonatewith a pH of 10. The Phase 1 samples for the multiple pH extractions will be collected from the sampling location in each pond that is anticipated to have the greatest sludge thickness. Exhibit 7-A presents 

## an isopach map of pond sediment (i.e., sludge) thickness determined in a 1993 study ofthe FEPs. The TCLP extractions and the multiple pH extractions will be analyzed for all constituents except total sulfide, total oil and grease, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) characteristics ofignitability and corrosivity. Note that the extracts will not be analyzed for pesticides and herbicides, which are excluded based on waste process knowledge. Also note that organics that are not detected in the total analyses, except those listed under 40 CFR 8261.24,do not need to be analyzed in the TCLP and multiple pH extracts. 

## In Phase 1,however,

## BWXT 

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04 organics listed under 40 CFR 5261.24 (except for pesticides and herbicides) will be analyzed in the TCLP and multiple pH extractions, even ifthey are not detected in the total analyses. Phase 2 will collect samples from more numerous locations that are randomly selected according to the method recommended for surface impoundments in 

## EPA RCRA DelistingProgram, Guidance Manualfor thePetitioner, March 2000. The Phase 

## 2 samples will be analyzed for a subset of analytes to be determinedby the Phase 1results, as described in Section N.C. 

## 11. Sampling Locations
The plan for sampling the FEP sludges is to collect a sufficient number of samples using an unbiased approachto characterize the material in the ponds. The sampling plan accounts for potential vertical and horizontal variability in the sludge. Horizontal variability is accounted for in the sampling strategy for each pond, as described later in this section. Vertical variability ofthe sludge will be addressed by taking a representative sample from the full thickness of sludge at each sampling location. Each location will be sampled by taking one or more cores through the entire thickness of sludge (multiple cores could be necessary to obtain sufficient sample material for all the analyses). VOCs will be analyzed on a subsample taken from the middle portion of a sludge core that will be frozen to maintain the integrity of the subsample. 

## A. Phase 1 Sampling Locations
To obtain arepresentative sampling of each pond for the Phase 1analysis, a systematic sampling approach will be used. Each pond will be divided into four approximately equal surface areas (quadrants), and the approximate center of each quadrant will be sampled. Sample locations somewhat off the center of a quadrant may be selected to improve the efficiency of sample collection by avoiding areas where the sludge is less than 2 feet thick. The total number of sampled quadrants will be eight, four from FEPl and four from FEP2. For the sampling location in each quadrant, multiple cores of sludge will be collected, composited, and analyzed as an independent sample.
Due to the large number of analytical parameters in Phase 1, it will be necessary to collect multiple cores at each locationto obtain sufficient sludge material for all the analyses. After determining the thickness of the sludge in each quadrant, the sampling team will estimate the number of cores needed to obtain sufficient sample volume for the suite of analyses. When multiple cores are collected at a single sample location, one of the cores will be frozen, so that an aliquot for VOC analysis can be obtained from a cross-section at the middle ofthe core. The other cores from a location will not be frozen. For analytical samples other than VOCs, the materials from the several cores will be composited, as described in Section 

## 1II.G.

## BWXT

# - FEP Delisting Petition 

## 11/8/04

B. Phase 

## 2 Sampling Locations 

## B.l Phase 

## 2 Overview Sample locations for Phase 2 are selectedusing the random sampling selection process for surface impoundments as described in EPA 

## RCRA DelistingProgram, Guidance Manualfor the Petitioner, March 2000. First, the total area of each pond is determined. Second, each pond is divided into equal sampling sections of less than or equal to 10,000 square feet (sq ft) (FEPI will be divided into 7 sections and FEP2 into 6 sections). Third, each 10,000-sq-ft section is divided into a grid of one hundred squares or rectangles roughly 10 feet on each side (hereafter referred to as "squares"). Finally, a random number table is used to select four squares for sampling within each section. Each ofthe four "squares" within a section will be sampled for sludge, and the sludge cores from each section will be composited into a single sample for analysis (except for VOC analysis). The resulting number of samples for analysis will be 7 from FEPI and 

## 6 from FEP2.
If VOC analysis is necessary inPhase 

## 2 (depending onthe Phase 1 results), then a single sample for VOC analysis will be collected from the middle of a sludge core where the sludge is thickest. Therefore, only one core from each 10,000-sq-ft section will be frozen ifVOCs are to be analyzed. If a composite of single cores from the four sampling "squares" in a section provides insufficient material for analyses, then multiple cores will be obtained from each sampling "square." The resulting composite must include the same number of cores from each sampling "square." For example, suppose that the sludge is so thin in a particular 10,000-sq-ft section, that single cores from each of the four sampling squares within that section would not provide enough sludge material for all the analyses. Perhaps two cores would have to be taken at each ofthe four sampling squaresto obtain sufficient sample material. Then, one of the two cores from the location with the thickest sludge would be frozen and the middle portion sampled for VOCs. The unfrozen cores and the remainder of the frozen core would then be composited to collect a single sample for the other analytes. 

## B.2 Determination of SurfaceArea
FEPl has an irregular shape, and its surface area is 68,500 sq ft. FEP2 is rectangular, and its approximate surface area is 54,800 sq ft. Plan views and surface area calculations for the FEPs are presented in Exhibit 7-B. 

## B.3 Determination of Sampling Sections
FEP 1is divided into seven (7) 10,000-sq-ft sections. Due to the irregular shape of FEP 1, the surface area ofthe sections varies from approximately 9,559 to 9,853 sq 

## ft. The sampling section layout for FEP 1 is presented in Exhibit 7-C.

## BWXT

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04

FEP2 is divided into six 

## (6) equal sections, each having a surface area of 9,133 sq 

## ft. The sampling section layout for FEP2 is presented in Exhibit 7-D. 

## C. 

## Determination of Phase 2 

## Sample Locations Each of the sampling sections is divided into 100 "squares" roughly 10 feet on a side. The 

## square^'^ are consecutively numbered from 1 to 100, beginning in the northwest corner of the section and proceeding east, then south. The random number table presented in 

## EPA 

## RCRA DelistingProgram, GuidanceManual for the Petitioner, March 2000, isused to randomly select four squares for sampling within each section. The table is presented in Exhibit 7-E. Sampling points will be located in the centers of the squares. In some cases where the first set of four random numbers in the table would provide a poor representation of a particular section, a second set or a third set of random numbers that provides a better representation was chosen (FEP1 Sections 

## 5 and 7, and FEP2 Section 2). Each of the sampling points selected using the random number table was assigned a unique coordinate address, measured in feet to the east and to the south from the northwest comer ofthe pond to the center ofthe square selected by the random number table (e.g., [E7, S3] is the point 7 feet east and 

## 3 feet south of the northwest comer ofFEP2, the center of square 01 of Section 1 ofFEP2, selected by the random number table for sampling). 

## C.l 

## FEPl FEPl has 28 Phase 2 sampling locations. The layout of 10,000-sq-ftsections and "squares" for FEPl is presented in Exhibit 7-C. Table 2 presents the coordinates for the Phase 

## 2 sampling locations at FEP1. Exhibit 7-F shows the coordinate system, the locations ofthe individual sampling points, the boundaries of the sampling sections within which samples will be composited, and the approximate depth of sludge at FEP1.

FEP2 has 24 Phase 2 sampling locations. The sampling location layout for FEP2 is presented in Exhibit 7-D. Table 

## 3 presents the coordinates for the Phase 

## 2 sampling locations at FEP2. Exhibit 7-G shows the coordinate system, the locations of the individual sampling points, the boundaries of the sampling sections within which samples will be composited, and the approximate depth of sludge at FEP2. 

## 111. Sample Collection -

## Phases 1 and 2 The sludge sampling method described in this plan is similar to the method used for the 1993 study.

## BWXT

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04


## A. Field Health and Safety
The most recent revision to the site-specific health and safety plan prepared for the RCRA corrective action program at the Mt. Athos site will be used to guide implementation of the sample collection activity (Site-SpeciJic Health andSafety Planfor 

## BWX Technologies,Inc, Mt. Athos Facility, Lynchburg, Virginia, August 6, 2003). Prior to the fieldwork, the health and safetyplan will be reviewed to ensure that it addresses hazards particular to the work described in this sampling plan. 

## B. Sampling Rig and Navigation Method


## A sampling rig will be fabricated from two boats positioned in opposing directions, stern to stern, clamped together using lumber and 

## "C" clamps to giv a working length of approximately 26 feet for the equipment and two sampling technicians. Ropes will be strung across the pond to pull the vessel to the designated sample locations. To guide positioning ofthe vessel, rows of pin flags or stakes spaced 50 feet apart (or other appropriate interval) may be set up along the sides of the pond. 

## C. Sampling Equipment and Preparation Samples will be collected using new, clear polycarbonate tubes with a wall thickness of 118inch. A typical tube diameter is 2-518 inches, but other diameters may be used. Plugs or other sealing devices will be used to prevent the sludge material from leaking out of the tube while being retrieved from the pond depth and transported to the sample process area. Aluminum foil caps secured with tape, cable ties or hose clamps may be used to seal the bottom end ofthe sample tube after each sample is collected. A new polycarbonate sampling tube, precleaned to food-grade standards and wrapped by the manufacturing company, will be used to collect each sample from the ponds. All sampling equipment used for sample homogenization and packing (e.g., stainless steel bowls, stainless steel mixing spoons, stainless steel holding tins, Pyrex ladles) will be decontaminated prior to use for each sample. Personnel will wear new latex gloves when handling samples or sampling equipment. Sampling equipment will be decontaminated as follows:
DI water rinse ~i~uinox@ soap solution wash DI water rinse, twice Dilute nitric acid solution rinse Final DI water rinse Air dried and wrapped in aluminum foil. If polycarbonate sampling tubes are reused for sample collection, the selected tube will be decontaminated using the above procedures.

## BWXT 

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04

D. Sample Handling Area
A work area will be established to decontaminate the sampling equipment and to prepare and process the samples for transport to the laboratory. The area will include separate locations for sample collection, preparation and sample processing, decontamination, and sample and waste storage. All tubs, bowls, drums, and coolersused in processing the sludge sample material will be placed in secondary containment to prevent accidental spillage of material onto the ground. 

## E. Disposal ofInvestigation-DerivedWaste Investigation-derived wastes should be disposed of as follows: 

## Pond Water After collecting sludge cores, pond water remaining in the sampling tubes should be drained through the weep hole located above the top of the sludge. The drained pond water shouldbe stored in an appropriate container. Pond water fiom the container should then be disposed of back into the pond from which the tube was collected. 

## Sludge Excess sampled sludge left over after the sample containers are filled shouldbe disposed ofback into the pond from which the sample was collected. 

## Decontamination Water Water generated during decontamination processes should be stored in a labeled 55-gallon drum for treatment and disposal at the low-level radioactive (LLR) Waste Treatment Facility. 

## PPE

Trash After use, personal protective equipment (PPE) such as sample gloves or booties should be placed into a trash bag and labeled according to contents. Trash bags containing PPE waste will be screened for radiation and disposed of by BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) personnel. Miscellaneous items (e.g., cardboard boxes, excess tape, string, paper) shouldbe disposed of into a trash bag for regular waste disposal performed by BWXT personnel. 

## F. SamplingMethod Sludge samples will be collected as follows: 

## 1. At each sample location, the depth ofwater to the top ofthe sludge layer and the thickness of the sludge will be measured. Sludge thickness will be measured using a marked rod. Depth to the top of sludge will be measured using a marked rod with a disc or plate that will provide resistance at the sludge layer. After recording the depths, the length ofpolycarbonate sample tube necessary to collect the full column of sludge will be

## BWXT

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04 selected. (However, if the sludge is less than one-half foot thick, the sludgewill not be sampled.) The polycarbonate tubing will be pushed through the sludge layers and driven into the clay layer on the bottom ofthe pond using a mallet. The clay helps serve as a plug to keep the sample in the tube and as a visual confirmation that the base ofthe sludge layer is reached.
To obtain sufficient sludge for all the analyses, multiple cores may be necessary at each sampling location. 

## In Phase 2, where cores from four sampling squares will be composited, if multiple cores are needed, then the same number of cores will be collected from each ofthe sampling squares, and an equal number of tubes from each square will be composited (this is to ensure that the final composite is equally representative ofthe sludge from the four sample locations inthe section). See Table 11 for sample volumes and quality control (QC) 

## sample requirements in Phase 1. A cap or stopper will be inserted on the top end of the sample tube to serve as a seal to retain the sample as the tube iswithdrawn from the bottom ofthe pond. The tube containing the sample will be lifted at an angle to reduce the downward pressure onthe column. The sample tube will be held over the side ofthe boat, and the outside ofthe sample tube will be rinsed with 

## DI water. The bottom end will be secured with an aluminum foil cap that will be secured with tape, cable ties or hose clamps to ensure that the samplewill not fall out of the tube during handling. In Phase 1, sample tube designations will be assigned by the pond number, the quadrant designation, and the order in which the tubes are collected in that quadrant. 

## In Phase 2, sample tube designations will include the pond number, the location coordinates, and, if multiple cores are necessary, the order in which tubes are collected at that coordinate location. After sample collection, the total sludge depth will be measured, including measurements of any stratification in the sample. The sludge will be described for color and any other visual characteristics, looking through the polycarbonate tube wall. The total sludge depth and description will be recorded on a Sample Collection Log. A hole will be drilled in the sample tube at the top of the sludge layer to allow the water column above the sample to weep out ofthe tube. The sludge description may be annotated the following day, after the frozen sludge core is extruded from the tube and the VOC sample is containerized, as the sludge may be more easily examined then. The sample tubes will be wrapped with new aluminum foil at the top end. The sample tubes will be moved to the sample handling area. Cores from which VOC samples are to be obtained will be frozen as described in the next section.

## BWXT 

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04

G. Sample Preparation The sample tubes from which VOC samples are to be taken will be frozen overnight as described later in this section. The next day, the frozen cores will be extruded (pushed) from the tubes. Sample aliquots for VOC analysis will be cored from the frozen sections using ~n~ore@ collection systems and placed in the foil packs provided for the Encores. The unfrozen cores from each Phase 1 sampling location (i.e., quadrant), or each Phase 

## 2 10,000- sq-ft sampling section, will be combined and homogenized, and the homogenized material will be used for filling the remainder (other than VOC) of the sample containers. Composites must be made from an equal number of cores from each sampling location. The unfrozen cores to be composited will be placed in a new stainless steel pan or other suitable, cleaned metal container. The combined sludges will be homogenized within the container by stirring with a decontaminated utensil. Aliquots ofthe homogenized sludge will be placed in the appropriate sample bottles. Table 

## 4 lists the sample containers, preservation requirements, and holding times for the various analytical parameters. The sample freezing system for VOC sample cores will consist oftwo 

## (2) 55-gallon open-head drums, several pieces of 6-inch or 10-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe cut in lengths slightly longer than the sample tubes and capped at one end, and dry ice pellets. The PVC pipe sections will be placed into a new 55-gallon drum, and the sample tubes will be lowered into the PVC pipes in groups ofthree 

## (3) or fewer. Dry ice pellets will be poured into the spaces between the sample tubes until the PVC pipes are full and the sample tubes are completely covered. A second drum will be inverted and placed over the bottom drum. Both drums will be wrapped in plastic sheeting and taped to prevent air from coming into contact with the dry ice, which will help insulate the freezing system. The tubes will be left in the dry ice overnight to ensure that the cores will be frozen before being cut open in the middle. To prevent tampering while the samples are left overnight in the drums, custody tape seals will be placed across the overlapping edges of either the drums or the plastic sheeting. The custody seals will be initialed and dated by one of the sampling team members. The next day, the frozen sample tubes will be removed from the PVC pipes to process VOC samples for submission to the laboratory. The exterior surface ofthe frozen sample tube will be sprayed with DI water to slightly thaw the sample for removal from the tube.
As soon as the sludge is extruded from the sampling tube, the sample aliquot for VOC analysis will be removed from the middle ofthe sludge core. Sample aliquots for VOC analysis will be removed from the frozen sludgeby coring, such as with a cork borer or with an EnCore sampler. If anEnCore sampler is used, sample collection should be conducted from the center of the frozen core midsection, not from the sides ofthe core. For VOC sample aliquots that will be placed in sample jars, small portions ofthe frozen core shouldbe tightly packed into the sample

## BWXT 

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04 jar before any thawing (and potential volatilization) takes place. The VOC sample container will be filled completely to minimize headspace.
A custody seal will be placed across each sample container lid or cooler that contains multiple samples. The sample containers will be placed in coolers with ice or stored in a secured refrigerator to maintain a temperature of

## 4 degrees Celsius ("C). Because the samples will be delivered to the on-site BWXT laboratory soon after collection (typically, before the samples have a chance to be cooled), temperature blanks are not required. Samples for VOC analysis will be delivered to the laboratory the same day they are removed from the cores. Other samples preferably will be delivered to the laboratory the same day also; but if they are held overnight, then the coolers will be kept in a secure, locked location. Custody ofthe samples will be maintained following the chain-of-custody procedures in the BWXT Data Collection Quality Assurance Plan (DCQAP). 

## H. Field Documentation The sludge sampling activities will be documented on the following kinds of field forms: Field Activity Daily Log Sample Collection Log Chain-of-CustodyForm. Examples of these forms, and how they are used, are included in the DCQAP.
The daily narrative ofthe fieldwork for the sludge sampling will be documented onField Activity Daily Logs. Each sludge tube or other sample collected will be documented on a Sample Collection Log. The Sample Collection Log will provide the following information about the sample: pond identifier (ID), sample location ID, number of tubes collected at the sampling point, sludge depth and description, collection of additional material for QC samples, and any comments or observations. All samples sent to the laboratory for analysis will be accompaniedby a chain-of-custody form, which will also include the request for analysis.


## IV. 

## SampleAnalysis
A. Analytical Laboratories It is anticipated that all laboratory analyses, except dioxins/furans and oil and grease, will be performed by the BWXT Services Nuclear Environmental Laboratory. Dioxinslfurans will be analyzedby Eno River Labs of Durham, North Carolina. Oil and grease will be analyzedby Severn Trent Laboratory-St. Louis, Earth City, Missouri. The current certificates of accreditation for the laboratories are presented in Attachment B ofthe DCQAP.

## BWXT

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04

If another laboratory is used for some ofthe analyses, that laboratory will be accredited by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program for the analyses the laboratory will perform. 

## B. Phase 1 Analytical Parameters The parameters to be analyzed in the Phase 1 sludge samples are listed in Table 1. The specific analytical methods and the laboratories' standard reporting limits for the various parameter groups are listed in Tables 

## 5 through 10. 

## C. Phase 

## 2 Analytical Parameters After the Phase 

## 1 analysis results are completed and compiled, a summary will be provided to the 

## U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). To provide a cost-effective and comprehensive sampling analysis for Phase 

## 2, a telephone conference call or meeting will be held with the EPA to determine the final list of analytes for the Phase 2 sludge samples. It is anticipated that the Phase 2 samples will be analyzed for a significantly shorter list of analytes. 

## V. Quality Control Samples -

## Phases 1 

## and 2 QC samples will be collected and analyzed to verify the integrity ofthe sampling and analytical program. The types of QC samples that will be collected and their general collection frequencies are described below. 

## A. Trip Blanks Trip blanks are applicable only to samples being analyzed for VOCs. The blanks are prepared in the laboratory using laboratory-gradeDI water. The blanks are transported to the site and back to the laboratory without being opened until the site samples are analyzed. One trip blank will accompany each cooler that contains samples to be analyzed for VOCs. The trip blank will be analyzed for VOCs along with the sludge samples that it accompanied from the field.



## B. Equipment Rinsates Equipment rinsate samples will be collected during sampling to verify the effectiveness of sampling equipment cleaning and to monitor for potential to inadvertently transport constituents of interest between samples. Equipment rinsates will be collected from the final DI water rinses ofthe polycarbonate sampling tubes or the sludge homogenization containers (sequential rinsate samples will alternate between the two). One rinsate sample will be collected for every 20 sludge samples, or two per sampling event (e.g., sampling phase), whichever is greater. The rinsate samples will be analyzed for total concentrations of all the chemical parameters.

## BWXT 

# - FEP Delisting Petition 

## 11/8/04

C. Field Blanks Field blanks will be prepared in the field from the source of the 

## DI water used for cleaning. Analysis of field blanks will ensure that all water sources used during cleaning of sampling equipment are free of the parameters of interest. One field blank will be collected per source of water used for equipment cleaning or one per sampling event, whichever is greater. The field blank(s) will be analyzed for total concentrations of all the chemical parameters.


## D. Field Duplicates Field duplicate samples of the sludges will be collected. The aliquots of field duplicates for VOC analysis will be collected from adjacent positions on the same sludge core. Field duplicate aliquots for the other analytical parameters will be collected from the homogenized sludge. A minimum of one field duplicate will be collected for every 20 sludge samples, or one per sampling phase, whichever is greater. Field duplicates will be analyzed for the sameparameters as the other sludge samples. 

## E. Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Samples Separate field samples will be collected for the laboratory matrix spikelmatrix spike duplicate (MSIMSD) analyses. MSMSD samples are described in the DCQAP. One pair ofMSIMSD samples will be collected for every 20 sludge samples, or one per sampling event, whichever is greater. 

## VI. Sample Quantities
Table 11lists the estimated numbers of sludge samples and 

## QC samples and the sample containers for the Phase 1 sampling. 

## VII. Data Validation The analytical data will be validated by Shaw Environmental, Inc., in accordance with the EPA Region 

## I11Innovative Approaches to Data Validation(June 1995). The validation will evaluate the laboratory analytical reports and the associated field documentation to determine whether the sampling and analytical method requirements are achieved. The analytical data generated will be analyzed for precision, accuracy, representativeness, completeness, and comparability. Organic compounds will be validated at level M-2 and inorganic compounds at level 

## M-1. The minimum acceptable completeness goal for Phase 

## 1will be 

## 7 out of 

## 8 sample analyses, except for the multiplepH extractions, for which 100percent completeness is required. If necessary, more samples will be taken and analyzed to generate a data set that is acceptably complete. The completeness goal for Phase 

## 2 will be a minimum of 90 percent.

## BWXT

# - FEP Delisting Petition 

## 1119104
LIST 

## OF 

## TABLES
1 Analytical Parameters for Phase 1 Sampling and Analysis ofthe FEP Sludges
2 Coordinates ofPhase 2 Sludge SamplingLocations -

## FEP1 3 Coordinates ofPhase 2 Sludge SamplingLocations -

## FEP2 

## 4 Analytical Methods, Sample Containers, and Preservation Requirements, Phase 

## 1Analyses ofFEP Sludges 5 

## Reporting Limits for Metals, Inorganics, and Formaldehyde, Phase 1Analyses ofFEP Sludges 6 

## Reporting Limits for Miscellaneous Parameters, Phase 1Analyses of FEP Sludges
7 

## Reporting Limits for Volatile Organics, Phase 1Analyses ofFEP Sludges 

## 8 Reporting Limits for Semivolatile Organics, Phase 1Analyses ofFEP Sludges 

## 9 Reporting Limits for Polychlorinated Biphenyls, Phase 1Analyses ofFEP Sludges 

## 10 Reporting Limits for Dioxins and Furans, Phase 

## 1Analyses ofFEP Sludges
11 Numbers of Sludge and Quality Control Samples, Phase 1Analyses ofFEP Sludges

LIST 

## OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 7-A Isopach Map of Sediment Material in Ponds 1and 2 (Figure 2 from the Report ofFindings, Sediment Sampling fvonz the Final Effluent Ponds, by IT Corp., October 1993)
EXHIBIT 7-B Plan Views and Surface Area Calculations for the FEPs EXHIBIT 7-C Sampling Section Layout for FEP 1
EXHIBIT 7-D Sampling Section Layout for FEP2 EXHIBIT 7-E Random Number Table
EXHIBIT 7-F Phase 2 Sludge SamplingLocations for FEP1
EXHIBIT 

## 7-G Phase 2 Sludge SamplingLocations for FEP2

### Table I Analytical Parameters for Phase 

### I Sampling and Analysis of the FEP Sludges 

### BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia

App. IX 

### = 40 CFR 264 Appendix IX, Ground-Water Monitoring List FEP 

### = Final Effluent Pond Notes: I.

All samples from four locations in each pond will be tested for all parameters, except only one sample from each pond will be subjected to multiple pH extractions 

### 2. Analyses will includethe following constituents not included in 40 CFR 261 Appendix Vlll: acetone, ethylbenzene, isophorone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, styrene, and xylenes (total). 3. Ifthe total chromium content exceeds one percent, then analyze for hexavalent chromium by Method 7196A. 

### 4. Ifthe content of oil and grease equals or exceeds one percent,then extractable metals will be determined using the OilyWaste Extraction Procedure SW-846 Method 1330) in lieu of TCLP extraction. 5. If no total cyanide is detected, then it is unnecessaryto analyze for TCLP-extractable cyanide. 6. Organics that are not detected in the total analyses (exceptfor organics listed in 40 CFR 261.24) do not needto be analyzed inthe TCLP extracts. Organics listed in 40 CFR 261.24 will be analyzed in the TCLP and multiple pH extracts, even ifthey are not detected in the total analyses. 

### 7. TCLP extractionfor cyanide will use deionizedwater as the leachingfluid. 8. TCLP analysesfor all constituents using two extraction fluids other than the standard TCLP extractionfluid: 

### (I) distilled deionizedwater; and (2) sodium bicarbonate and sodium carbonate solutionof pH 10. This is described in the EPA RCRA Delisting ProgramGuidance Manualfor the Petitioner, March 2000, Appendix 

### H, Elementsof the Region 6's Evaluation Process, Attachment 4, Multiple pH Test Protocol,a~.epa.aovlearthl r616pdlrcra clpd9. Analytical results will be reported on a wet weight basis. Sludge water content will also be analyzed and reported. 10. For total concentration analyses, the sludge sampleswill be preparedand analyzed as a solid matrix.

KN4\BWXT\FEP\SAP\Exhibit 719-04\FEP SAP Tab1.ds\Sheetl\l11812004\4:37 PM (note 1) TOTAL

8

8 NO. OF SAMPLES ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS FEP 1 

## 1 FEP2 Total Analyses (note 10) Appendix IXVOCs (note 2) Appendix IX SVOCs (note 2) Appendix IX Metals (note 3) Appendix IX PCBs Appendix IIX DioxinslFurans Oil and Grease (note 4) Total Sulfide Total Cyanide (note 5) Formaldehyde Fluoride 4

8 Other Analyses 4

Percentwater content or percentsolids (note 9) Corrosivity lgnitability 4 TCLP-Extract Analyses Appendix IXVOCs (notes 2 and 6) Appendix IX SVOCs (notes 2 and 6) Appendix IX Metals (note 4) Appendix IX PCBs(note 6) Appendix IX DioxinslFurans(note 6) Cyanide (notes 5 and 7) Formaldehyde(note 6)

4 4

4

## Table 

## 2 Coordinates of Phase 

## 2 Sludge Sampling Locations

# - FEPI BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia

## Table 3 Coordinates of Phase 

## 2 Sludge Sampling Locations 

# - FEP2 

## BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia

LOCATION ID LOCATION ID

### Table 

### 4 Analytical Methods, Sample Containers, and Preservation Requirements Phase 1Analyses of 

### FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 1 of 3

Notes: 1. Analytical results will be reported on a wet weight basi 2. Ifthe total chromium content exceeds one percent, then analyze for hexavalent chromium by method 7196A. Note that the soil holding time for hexavalent chromium analysis is 28 3. Ifthe content of oil and grease equals or exceeds one percent, then extractable metals will be determined using the Oily Waste Extraction Procedure (SW-846 method 1330) in lieu of TCLP extraction. 4. If no total cyanide isdetected, then it is unnecessary to analyze for TCLP-extractable cyani~ 5. Organics that are not detected inthe total analyses (except for organics listed in 40 CFR 261.24) do not need to be analyzed inthe TCLP extracts. Organics listed in 40 CFR 261.24 (except pesticides and herbicides)will be analyzed inthe TCLP and multiple pH extracts, even ifthey are not detected inthe total analyses. 6. TCLP extraction for cyanide will use dionized water asthe leaching flui 7. I#12# days means I# days until TCLP extraction, 

### 2# days from TCLP extraction until determinative analy: 8. I# 1% /3# days means I#days until TCLP extraction, 2# days from TCLP extraction until preparative extraction, 3# days from preparative extraction until anal 9. TCLP analyses for all constituents using two extraction fluids other than the standardTCLP extraction fluid: (1) distilled deionized water; and (2) sodium bicarbonate/sodiumcarbonate solution of pH 10. 10. For total concentration analyses, the sludge samples will be prepared and analyzed as a solid matrix. 11. I#1% days means I# days until extraction, 2# days from extraction until determinative analyc Analytical Parameters

KN4\BWXT\FEP\SAP\EXHIBlT7\9-04\FEP SAP Tables 4-1 1(11-0804).xls(Table 4)\11/9/2004(10:20 AM) Preparation

Method Cleanup Method Total Analyses (note 10) Analytical Method (note 1)
Appendix IX VOCs Appendix IX SVOCs
Appendix IX Metals (note 2)
Appendix IX PCBs Appendix IX DioxinslFurans Oil and Grease (note 3) Total Sulfide Total Cyanide (note 4) Formaldehyde Fluoride Sample Container

SW846-5035 SW846-3540C or 3545A or 35508 SW846-3051A and 7471 A SW846-3540C or 3545A or 35508

SW846-903OB SW846-901 OB

EPA 300.0 sect 11.7 Sample Volume

SW846-3665A or SW846-3665Al3630C Holding Time SamplePreservation

SW846-826OB SW846-827OC SW846-601 OBI 7471 A17041/7060A/ 742117841 or 6020A SW846-8082 SW846-8290 SW846-9071 B SW846-9034 SW846-9014 HACH Formaldehyde

(MBTH Method)

SW846-9056 2or4oz glass 4 oz glass 4 oz glass

4 oz glass 4 oz glass 8 oz glass 4 oz glass 4 oz glass 4 oz glass 4 oz glass 30 grams 60 grams
20 grams
60 grams 60 grams 70 grams 30 grams 10 grams 10 grams 10 qrams 14days 14/40 days (note II
180days,

Hg 28d 14/40 days (note II 28/40 days (note 11 28 days 7 days 14days 14 days 28 days 4OC 4OC

4OC

4OC 4OC 4OC 4OC 4OC 4OC 4OC

### Table 

### 4 Analytical Methods, Sample Containers, and Preservation Requirements Phase 

### 1 Analyses of 

## FEP Sludges BWXT 

### Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 2 of 3

Notes: 1. Analytical resultswill be reported on a wet weight basi 2. Ifthe total chromium content exceeds one percent, then analyze for hexavalent chromium by method 7196A. Note that the soil holding time for hexavalent chromium analysis is 28 Analytical Parameters TCLP Analyses Appendix IX VOCs (note 5) Appendix IX SVOCs (note 5) Appendix IX Metals (notes 2 and 3) Appendix IX PCBs (note 5) Appendix IX DioxinsIFurans (note 5) Cyanide (notes 4 and 6) Formaldehyde (note 5)
Fluoride



## .. .

3. Ifthe content of oil and grease equals or exceeds one percent, then extractable metals will be determined using the Oily Waste Extraction Procedure (SW-846 method 1330) in lieu ofTCLP extraction. 4. If no total cyanide isdetected, then it is unnecessaryto analyze for TCLP-extractablecyani~ 5. Organics that are not detected inthe total analyses (except for organics listed in 40 CFR 26124)do not need to be analyzed inthe TCLP extracts. Organics listed in 40 CFR 261.24 (except pesticides and herbicides) will be analyzed inthe TCLP and multiple pH extracts, even ifthey are not detected in the total analyses. 6. TCLP extraction for cyanide will use dionized water as the leaching flui 7. I#12# days means I# days until TCLP extraction, 2# days from TCLP extraction until determinativeanalyd 8. I#12# 13# days means I# days until TCLP extraction, 2# days from TCLP extraction until preparative extraction, 3# days from preparative extraction until anal 9. TCLP analyses for all constituents using two extraction fluids other than the standard TCLP extractionfluid: (1) distilled deionizedwater; and (2) sodium bicarbonate/sodiumcarbonate solution of pH 10. 10. For total concentration analyses, the sludge samples will be prepared and analyzed as a solid matrix. Preparation

Method SW846-1311 SW846-503OB
SW846-3510C or 3520C

SW846-3015Aand 7470A
SW846-3510Cor 3520C

SW846-901 OB

KN4\BWXT\FEP\SAP\EXHlBlT 7\904\FEP SAPTables 4-1 1 (Il-0804).xls(Table 4)\11/9/2004(10:20 AM) Cleanup Method Analytical Method (note 1)

SW846-3665Aor SW846- 3665Al3630C Sample Container

SW846-82606 SW846-827OC SW846-601 OBI 7470Aff041/7060A/ 742117841 or 6020A SW846-8082 SW846-8290 SW846-9014 HACH Formaldehyde (MBTH Method) SW846-9056 Sample Volume

2 oz glass 1 L glass

500 ml glass

1 L glass 1Lglass
500 ml glass
500 ml glas
500 ml glas: Holding Time SamplePreservation

40 ml
1000 ml

200 ml

1000 ml
l000ml
50 ml
50
10 ml 14/14days (note 7) 14/7/40 days

(note 8) 281281180 days (note 7) 14/7/40 days

(note 8) 28/28/40 days (note 8) 1411 4 days (note 7) 14114 days

(note 7) 28/28 days

(note 7) 4% 4,C

4oC

4oC
40C 4OC

4%

### Table 

### 4 Analytical Methods, Sample Containers, and Preservation Requirements Phase 

### 1Analyses of 

### FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 3 of 3

extraction. 4. If no total cyanide isdetected, then it is unnecessaly to analyze for TCLP-extractable cyanii 5. Organicsthat are not detected inthe total analyses (except for organics listed in 40 CFR 261.24) do not need to be analyzed inthe TCLP extracts. Organics listed in 40 CFR 261.24 (except pesticides and herbicides) will be analyzed inthe TCLP and multiple pH extracts, even ifthey are not detected inthe total analyses. 6. TCLP extraction for cyanide will use dionized water asthe leaching flui 7. I# / 2# days means I# days until TCLP extraction, 2# days from TCLP extraction until determinativeanaly: 8. I# /2#/3# days means I# days until TCLP extraction, 2# days from TCLP extraction until preparative extraction,3# days from preparative extraction until anal 9. TCLP analyses for all constituents using two extraction fluids other than the standard TCLP extractionfluid: (1) distilled deionized water; and (2) sodium bicarbonate/sodiumcarbonate solution of pH 10. 10. Fortotal concentration analyses, the sludge samples will be prepared and analyzed as a solid matrix.

KN4\BWX17FEP\SAP\U(HlBlT 7\9-04FEP SAP Tables 4-11 (11-0804).xls(Table 4)\11/912004(10:20AM) I.

Analytical results will be reported on a wet weight basi 2. Ifthe total chromium content exceeds one percent, then analyze for hexavalent chromium by method 7196A. Notethat the soil holding time for hexavalent chromium analysis is 28 3. Ifthe content of oil and grease equals or exceeds one percent, then extractable metals will be determined using the Oily Waste Extraction Procedure (SW-846 method 1330) in lieu of TCLP Holding

Time
14114 days

(note 7) 14/7/40 days

(note 8) 28/28 days

(note 7) 14/7/40 days

(note 8) 28/28/40 days (note 8) 1411 4 days (note 7) 14114 days

(note 7) 28/28 days

(note 7)

N A ASAP 7 days Sample Volume

40 ml
1000 ml

200 ml

1000 ml
1000 ml
50 ml
50 ml
10 ml SamplePreservation

4OC
4oC
4OC

4oC
40C 4OC 4°C
4OC

N

A 4OC 4°C Analytical Method (note 1)

SW846-82608 SW846-827OC SW846-601 OBI 7470Ai7041i7060AI 7421/7841 or 6020A SW846-8082 SW846-8290 SW846-9014 HACH Formaldehyde (MBTH Method) SW846-9056 Cleanup Method

SW846-3665A or SW846- 3665Al3630C Analytical Parameters Multiple pH Leaching(note 9) Appendix IX VOCs (note 5) Appendix IX SVOCs (note 5) Appendix 1X Metals (notes 2 and 3) Appendix IX PCBs (note 5) Appendix IX DioxinsIFurans (note 5) Cyanide (note 4) Formaldehyde (note 5)
Fluoride Sample Container

2 oz glass 1 L glass

500 mi glass

1 L glass 1 L glass
500 ml glass
500 ml glass 500 rnl glass Preparation

Method Multiple pH Test Protocol SW846-5030B SW846-3510C or 3520C

SW846-3015Aand 7470A
SW846-3510Cor 3520C

SW846-9010B

Other Analyses Percent water content (note 1) Corros~vity lgnitability Notes: N A 2 oz glass 2 oz qlass N A 20 grams 30 grams CLP Moditied SW846-9045C SW846-1010 N A N

A N

A N A N

A N

A

### Table 5 

### Reporting Limits for Metals, Inorganics, and Formaldehyde Phase 1 

### Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia

Method: see below Laboratory: BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg,Virginia
Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjusted for % moisture or sample dilution factors.
Water or TCLP Extract Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit Detection Limit Reporting Limit Metals CAS # Method mglL mglL mglkg mglkg Antimony 7440-36-0 7041 0.0003 0.0003 0.06 0.06 Arsenic 7440-38-2 7060A 0.0013 0.001 3 0.26 0.26 Barium 7440-39-3 60108 0.001 1 0.001 I 0.22 0.22 Beryllium 7440-41-7 60108 0.00015 0.00015 0.03 0.03 Cadmium 7440-43-9 60108 0.0014 0.0014 0.28 0.28 Chromium 7440-47-3 601 08 0.0029 0.0029 0.58 0.58 Cobalt 7440-48-4 60108 0.0023 0.0023 0.46 0.46 Copper 7440-50-8 60108 0.0053 0.0053 1.06 1.06 Lead 7439-92-1 7421 0.0005 0.0005 0.1 0.1 Mercury 7439-97-6 7470A, 7471 A 0.00004 0.0001 0.007 0.017 Nickel 7440-02-0 60108 0.0062 0.0062 1.24 1.24 Selenium 7782-49-2 60108 0.0252 0.0252 5.04 5.04 Silver 7440-22-4 60108 0.0049 0.0049 0.98 0.98 Thallium 7440-28-0 7841 0.0005 0.0005 0.1 0.1 Tin 7440-31 -5 60108 0.0173 0.0173 3.46 3.46 Vanadium 7440-62-2 60108 0.0033 0.0033 0.66 0.66 Zinc 7440-66-6 6010B 0.0036 0.0036 0.72 0.72

Miscellaneous Water or TCLP Extract Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit Detection Limit Reporting Limit Compounds CAS # mg/L mglL m9lk9 mg/k9 Cyanide 57-12-5 9014 0.004 0.005 0.20 0.25 Fluoride 16984-48-8 9056 0.2 0.25 2.0 2.5 Sulfide (Acid Soluble) 18496-25-8 9034 N A N A 10 20 HACH 50-00-0 Formaldehyde Formaldehyde (MBTH 1

### .o 1

### .o 10.0 10.0

KN4\BWXT\FEP\SAP\EXHlBlT n9-04\FEP SAP Tables4-11 (ll-08-OQ)(Table5)\111912004(11:49 AM)

### Table 6 

### Reporting Limits for Miscellaneous Parameters Phase 

### 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges 

### BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia

Method: see below Laboratory:BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg, Virginia

Parameter Method Units Percent water content CLP Modified Ot0100 % Corrosivity 904% 0 to14 pH units lgnitability 1010 70 to 150 deg F

KN4\BWXnFEP\SAP\EXHlBlT 7\9-04\FEP SAP Tables 4-11 (11-08-04)(Table 6 )\I1/912004(11:49 AM)

### Table 

### 7 Reporting Limits for Volatile Organics

Phase 

### 1Analyses of 

### FEP Sludges BWXT 

### Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page I of 2

Method: SW846-82608 Laboratory:BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg,Virginia
Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjustedfor % moisture or sample dilution factors

Compound 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,I,?-TRICHLOROETHANE I,?

,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 ,I-DICHLOROETHANE 1,I-DICHLOROETHENE 1,l-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DIOXANE 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 2-BUTANONE 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHER 2-CHLOROTOLUENE 2-HEXANONE 4-CHLOROTOLUENE 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ACETONE ACETONITRILE ACROLEIN ACRYLONITRILE ALLYL CHLORIDE BENZENE BROMOBENZENE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BROMOFORM BROMOMETHANE CARBON DlSULFlDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROETHANE CHLOROFORM CHLOROMETHANE CHLOROPRENE CIS-?,2-DICHLOROETHENE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE DIBROMOMETHANE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ETHYL METHACRYLATE ETHYLBENZENE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE IODOMETHANE ISOBUTYLALCOHOL Water orTCLP Extract Detection Limil Reporting Lirnil CAS # uglL uglL 630-20-6 2 10 Solid Detection Lirnil Reporting Limif

KN4\BWXT\FEP\SAP\EXHIBlT79-D4\\FEPSAP Tables 4-11 (1 1-08-04)(Tabls 7)\111912004(11:49AM)

### Table 

### 7 Reporting Limits for Volatile Organics

Phase 

### I Analyses of 

### FEP Sludges 

### BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg,Virginia Page 2 of 2

Method: SW846-82608 Laboratory: BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg, Virginia
Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjusted for % moisture or sample dilution factors.
Water orTCLP Extract Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit Detection Limit Reporting Limii Compound CAS # uglL uglL uglkg uglkg ISOPROPYL BENZENE 98-82-8 2 10 2 I0 M,P-XYLENES METHACRYLONITRILE METHYL METHACRYLATE METHYL TERT-BUTYLETHER METHYLENECHLORIDE NAPHTHALENE N-BUTYLBENZENE N-PROPYLBENZENE 0-XYLENE P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE PROPIONITRILE SEC-BUTYLBENZENE STYRENE TERT-BUTYLBENZENE TETRACHLOROETHENE TOLUENE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRANS-I ,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE TRICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE VINYL ACETATE VINYL CHLORIDE

KN4!BVvXnFEP!SAP\WHlBlT 79-04!\FEP SAP Tables 4-11 (11-08-04)(Table7)\111912004(11:49AM)

### Table 8 

### Reporting Limits for Semivolatile Organics Phase 1

### Analyses of 

### FEP Sludges 

### BWXT 

### Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 1 of 3

Method: SW846-8270C Laboratory: BWXJ Services NEL Lynchburg, Virginia
Note: Detectionand reporting limits are not adjustedfor % moistureor sampledilution factors.
Water orTCLP Extract Detection Limit Reporting Limil Compound CAS # 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE 95-94-3 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 1,3,5-TRINITROBENZENE 99-35-4 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 I ,4-NAPTHOQUINONE 130-15-4 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 90-1 2-0 1-NAPHTHYLAMINE 134-32-7 2,2'-OXYBIS(1-CHLOROPROPANE) 108-60-1 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 58-90-2 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 95-95-4 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 88-06-2 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 120-83-2 2,4-DIMETHYPHENOL 105-67-9 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 51-28-5 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 121-14-2 2,6-DICHLOROPHENOL 87-65-0 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 606-20-2 2-ACETYLAMINOFLUORENE 53-96-3 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 91-58-7 2-CHLOROPHENOL 95-57-8 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 91-57-6 2-METHYLPHENOL 95-48-7 2-NAPHTHYLAMINE 91-59-8 2-NITROANILINE 88-74-4 2-NITROPHENOL 88-75-5 2-PICOLINE 109-06-08 2-SEC-BUNL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL 88-85-7 3,3'-DlCHLOROBENZlDlNE 91-94-1 3,3'-DIMETHYLBENZIDINE 11 9-93-7 3-METHYLCHOLANTHRENE 56-49-5 3-METHYLPHENOL 108-39-4 3-NITROANILINE 99-09-2 4,6-DINITRO-2-METHYLPHENOL 534-52-1 4-AMINOBIPHENYL 92-67-1 4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHER 101-55-3 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 59-50-7 4-CHLOROANILINE 106-47-8 4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHER 7005-72-3 4-METHYLPHENOL 106-44-5 4-NITROANILINE 100-01-6 4-NITROPHENOL 100-02-7 4-NITROQUINOLINE-N-OXIDE 56-57-5 5-NITRO-0-TOLUIDINE 99-55-8 7,12-DIMETHYLBENZ(A)ANTHRACENE 57-97-6 ACENAPHTHENE 83-32-9 ACENAPHTHYLENE 208-96-8 ACETOPHENONE 98-86-2 alpha, alpha-DIMETHYLPHYENETHYLAMIN[ 122-09-8 ANILINE 62-53-3 ANTHRACENE 120-12-7 AZOBENZENE 103-33-3 BENZlDlNE 92-87-5 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 56-55-3 BENZO(A)PYRENE 50-32-8 uglL uglL 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 I0 2.5 10 2.5 I0 2.5 I0 2.5 I0 2.5 10 2.5 I0 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 I0 2.5 10 2.5 I0 2.5 10 2.5 I0 2.5 10 2.5 20 2.5 I0 2.5 I0 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 I0 2.5 10 2.5 I0 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10

no standard available 2.5 I0 2.5 10 2.5 I0 2.5 10 2.5 10 2.5 10 Solid Detection Limit ReportingLimil uglkg uglkg

100 330 100 330 I00 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 I00 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 I00 330 100 330 I00 330 I00 330 I00 330 I00 330 I00 330 100 330 100 330 I00 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 I00 330 100 330

no standard available 100 330 I00 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330

KN4\BWXT\FEP\SAP\WHIBIT7i9-04\FEPSAP Tables 4-11 (11-08-M)(Table 8)\11/91ZOM(11:49AM)

### Table 8 

### Reporting Limits for Semivolatile Organics Phase 1

### Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 2 of 3

Method: SW846-8270C Laboratory:BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg, Virginia
Note: Detectionand reporting limits are not adjustedfor % moisture or sample dilution factors.

Compound BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE BENZOICACID BENZYL ALCOHOL BlS(2-CHLOROETH0XY)METHANE BlS(2-CHLOR0ETHYL)ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHLOROBENZILATE CHRYSENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYLPHTHALATE DIMETHYLPHTHALATE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCNLPHTHALATE DIPHENYLAMINE ETHYL METHANESULFONATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE HEXACHLOROETHANE HEXACHLOROPHENE HEXACHLOROPROPENE INDENO(l,2,3-CD)PYRENE ISOPHORONE ISOSAFROLE M-DINITROBENZENE METHAPYRILENE METHYL METHANESULFONATE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE N-NITROSODIETHYLAMINE N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE N-NITROSODI-N-BUTYLAMINE N-NITROSODINPROPYLAMINE N-NITROSOMETHYLETHYLAMINE N-NITROSOMORPHOLINE N-NITROSOPIPERIDINE N-NITROSOPYRROLDINE O-TOLUIDINE P-DIMETHYLAMINOAZOBENZENE PENTACHLOROBENZENE PENTACHLOROETHANE PENTACHLORONITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENACETIN PHENANTHRENE PHENOL P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE PRONAMIDE PYRENE Water orTCLP Extract Detection Limit Reporting Limit CAS# uglL uglL 205-99-2 2.5 10 191-24-2 2.5 10 207-08-9 2.5 10 65-85-0 2.5 10 100-51-6 2.5 10 111-91-1 2.5 10 111-44-4 2.5 10 117-81 -7 2.5 10 85-68-7 2.5 10 86-74-8



### ... 2.5 10 510-15-6 2.5 10 218-01 -9 2.5 10 53-70-3 2.5 10 132-64-9 2.5 10 84-66-2 2.5 10 131-11-3 2.5 10 84-74-2 2.5 10 117-84-0 2.5 10 122-39-4 2.5 10 62-50-0 2.5 10 206-44-0 2.5 10 86-73-7 2.5 10 118-74-1 2.5 10 87-68-3 2.5 I0 77-47-4 2.5 10 67-72- 1 2.5 10 70-30-4 unstable- inconsistent response 1888-71-7 2.5 10 193-39-5 2.5 10 78-59-1 2.5 10 120-58-1 2.5 10 99-65-0 2.5 10 91-80-5 2.5 10 66-27-3 2.5 10 91-20-3 2.5 10 98-95-3 2.5 10 55-18-5 2.5 10 62-75-9 2.5 10 924-1 6-3 2.5 10 621-64-7 2.5 10 10595-95-6 2.5 10 59-89-2 2.5 I0 100-75-4 2.5 10 930-55-2 2.5 10 95-53-4 2.5 10 60-1 1-7 2.5 10 608-93-5 2.5 10 76-01-7 2.5 10 82-68-8 2.5 10 87-86-5 2.5 10 62-44-2 2.5 10 85-01-8 2.5 10 108-95-2 2.5 10 106-50-3 2.5 10 23950-58-5 2.5 10 129-00-0 2.5 10 Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit uglkg uglkg

100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 I00 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 I00 330 100 330 100 330 unstable- inconsistent response 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330

KN4\BWXT\FEP\SAP\EXHiBlT 7\9-04!FEP SAP Tables4-11 (11-08-04)(Table 8)!111912004(11:49 AM)

### Table 8 

### Reporting Limits for Semivolatile Organics Phase 

### 1Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 3 of 3

Method: SW846-8270C Laboratory: BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg,Virginia Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjusted for % moisture or sample dilution factors.
Water or TCLP Extract Solid Detection Limil Reporting Limil Detection Limit Reporting Limil Compound CAS# uglL uglL Wlkg uglkg PYRlDlNE 11 0-86-1 2.5 10 100 330 SAFROLE 94-59-7 2.5 10 I00 330

KN4\BWXnFEP\SAP\EXHlBiT A9-04iFEP SAPTables4-11 (11-08-M)(Table 8)\111912004(11:49AM)

### Table 9 Reporting Limitsfor Polychlorinated Biphenyls 

## (PCB) Phase 

### 1 Analyses of 

### FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia

Method: SW846-8082 Laboratory:BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg, Virginia Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjusted for % moisture or sample dilution factors. Water or TCLP Extract Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit Detection Limit Reporting Limit

KN4\BWXnFEP\SAP\EXHIBlT n9-04\FEP SAP Tables4-H (1I-08-04XTable 9)\1119/2004(11.49 AM)

### Table 10 

### Reporting Limitsfor Dioxins and Furans Phase 

### 1 Analyses of 

### FEP Sludges 

### BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia

Method:SW846-8290 Laboratory:Eno River Labs, LLC Durham, North Carolina
Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjusted for % moisture or sample dilutionfactors.
Water or TCLP Extract Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit Detection Limit Reporting Limit

*pg/L = picograms per liter, nglkg 

### = nanograms per kilogram.

KN4\BWXnFEP\SAP\EXHiBlT 7\9-04\FEP SAP Tables4-11 (11-08-04XTable 10)\111912004(11.49AM)

### Table I 

### I Numbersof Sludge and Quality Contral Samples Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 1of 2

Notes: (1) Four sludge samples from each pondwill be analyzed for all parameters, except only one sample from each pondwill be subjected to multiple pH extractions. (2) One field duplicate for every 20 sludge samples, or one per sampling event, whichever is more frequc (3) One pair of MSIMSD samples will be collected for every 20 sludge samples, or one per sampling event, whichever is more frequent. These samples will require double vol (4) One equipment rinsate per 20 sludge samples or 2 per sampling event, whichever is more freque

KN4\8WXT\FEP\SAP\EXHlBlT A944\FEP SAP Tables4-1 1 (11-0804)(Table 11)\11/9/2004(11:49 AM)

## BWXT 

# - FEP Delisting Petition 

## 11/8/04

EXHIBIT 

## 7-A ISOPACH MAP 

## OF SEDIMENT MATERIAL IN PONDS 1 AND 

## 2 (FIGURE 

## 2 FROM THEREPORT OFFINDINGS, SEDIMENT SAMPLING FROM THE FINAL EFFLUENTPONDS, BY IT CORP., OCTOBER 1993)

## BWXT 

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04



## EXHIBIT 7-B 

## PLAN VIEWS 

## AND SURFACE AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE FEPS

## BWXT

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04
EXHIBIT 7-C SAMPLING SECTION LAYOUT FOR FEPl

## BWXT

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04



## EXHIBIT 7-D SAMPLING SECTION LAYOUT FOR 

## FEP2

## BWXT

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04

EXHIBIT 7-E RANDOM NUMBER TABLE

## EXHIBIT E RANDOM NUMBER TABLE



## FEPl Section 

### 1

Section 

### 2

Section 

### 3

Section

### 4

Section 

### 5

Section 6

Section 

### 7

Ezcb dzgrc, ra an rnde~e-dentsaple frm ;r popzL;rtr~a u: 3~3~3 =ha d~~tz fi %O 5 is= h;~-a11y lzke1y and zs -3Eh :?II a pr~kb~lzr-y of 1:ltO.

KN4\BWXT\FEP\SAP\EXHlBlT7\11-04\Exhibit 7-E rev.xls(Sheetl)\l1/9/2004(10:27 AM) 

### Page 1 

### of 2

## EXHIBIT E RANDOM NUMBER TABLE



## FEP2 Section 

### 1

Section

### 2

Section 

### 3

Section 

### 4

Section 

### 5

Section 6

KN4\BWXnFEP\SAP\EXHIBIT7\11-04\Exhibit7-E rev.xls(Sheetl)\l1/9/2004(10:27 AM) 

### Page 2 

### of 2

## BWXT

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04

EXHIBIT 7-F PHASE 

## 2 SLUDGE SAMPLINGLOCATIONS FOR FEPl

## BWXT 

# - FEP Delisting Petition 11/8/04


## EXHIBIT 7-G PHASE 

## 2 SLUDGE SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR FEP2