alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00664-CR

Renee Thompson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-04-300061, HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was originally due November 28, 2005. The time for filing was

extended three times on counsel’s motion. On February 1, 2006, in granting the third extension, this

Court ordered appellant’s attorney, Mr. Walter C. Prentice, to file a brief on appellant’s behalf no

later than February 27, 2006. Counsel did not file a brief as ordered.

The appeal is abated. The district court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and if so, whether appellant’s attorney, who was appointed

by the court, has abandoned the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make

appropriate findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel

who will effectively represent appellant. A record from this hearing, including copies of all findings
2

and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this

Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than April 17, 2006. Rule 38.8(b)(3).

__________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Filed: March 22, 2006

Do Not Publish
#### § 1300.14 Guarantee percentage.

A guarantee issued by the Board must be less than 100 percent of the amount of principal and accrued interest of the loan guaranteed.
§ 16.34 Consent orders. ( a ) The parties may agree at any time before the issuance of a final agency decision to dispose of the case by proposing a consent order. Good faith efforts to resolve a complaint through issuance of a consent order may continue throughout the administrative process. However, except as provided in § 16.11(a), such efforts may not serve as the basis for extensions of the times set forth in this part.
( b ) A proposal for a consent order, specified in paragraph (a) of this section, shall include: ( 1 ) A proposed consent order;
( 2 ) An admission of all jurisdictional facts; and
( 3 ) An express waiver of the right to further procedural steps and of all rights of judicial review.
( c ) If the parties agree to dispose of a case by issuance of a consent order before the FAA issues a Director's Determination, the proposal for a consent order is submitted jointly by the parties to the Director, together with a request to adopt the consent order and dismiss the case. The Director may issue the consent order as an order of the FAA and terminate the proceeding.
[Amdt. 16-1, 78 FR 56145, Sept. 12, 2013]
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Element 21 Golf Company (formerly BRL
      Holdings, Inc.) (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof, we, Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer,
      and John Grippo, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.




Date:
                November 12, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D.President
                and DirectorDate:
                November 12, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                John GrippoChief
                Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

-------------------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA 

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., (Jointly Administered)

Debtors.1

-------------------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER

 On January 16, 2018, National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation (“National”) filed 

a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004 (Dkt. No. 2247 in 17-BK-3283; 

Dkt. No. 371 in 17-BK-3567) (the “National 2004 Motion”). Upon agreement by the parties, this 

Court held the National 2004 Motion in abeyance on January 30, 2018 (Dkt. No. 2310 in 17-BK3283; Dkt. No. 381 in 17-BK-3567). As significant time has passed without additional motions 

from the parties related to the National 2004 Motion, this Court hereby terminates the motion 

for procedural purposes. The termination is without prejudice to either party to the National

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the 

last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees 

Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power 

Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) 

(Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3980 Filed:09/27/18 Entered:09/27/18 14:53:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

2004 Motion moving to renew the motion if good cause exists to do so.

This order resolves Dkt. No. 2247 in 17-BK-3283 and Dkt. No. 371 in 17-BK-3567.

SO ORDERED.

/ s / Judith Gail Dein 

Judith Gail Dein

United States Magistrate Judge 

DATED: September 27, 2018

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3980 Filed:09/27/18 Entered:09/27/18 14:53:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE BARROSO-VARGAS, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-70841 

Agency No. A096-474-071 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 26, 2017**

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Barroso-Vargas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal and 

denying his motion to remand. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 2 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-70841 

We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand. Romero-Ruiz 

v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and dismiss in 

part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of cancellation of removal 

for failure to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying 

relative, and Barroso-Vargas does not raise a colorable legal or constitutional claim 

that would invoke our jurisdiction. See Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 

(9th Cir. 2012) (absent a colorable legal or constitutional claim, the court lacks 

jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary hardship determination).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Barroso-Vargas’ motion to 

remand because the BIA considered the evidence that he submitted and acted 

within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to 

establish prima facie eligibility for cancellation of removal. See Singh v. INS, 295 

F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be 

reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
----

EXHIBIT 99.4 

For the purposes of Exhibit 99.4, the reference to the "Corporation" shallmean to Gildan Activewear Inc. 

Statement of Corporate Governance Practices 

The Board of Directors considers first-class corporategovernance practices to be an important factor in the overall success of theCorporation. Under the rules of the Canadian securities regulators, theCorporation is required to disclose information relating to its system ofcorporate governance with reference to certain corporate governance standardsadopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators ("CSA") (the "CSA Standards").

In the last few years, the Corporation has undertaken acomprehensive review of its corporate governance practices in order to bestcomply with and exceed the corporate governance requirements of Canadiansecurities regulators as well as the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards, the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* and other applicable U.S. securities legislation.For example, the Board recently updated the Corporation's Insider Trading Policyto include a prohibition against monetizing transactions and other hedgingprocedures by all insiders of the Corporation, including directors, that wouldreduce the exposure related to such insiders' equity holdings. The Corporation'sdisclosure addressing each of the CSA Standards is set out in Schedule "A" ofthe Corporation's Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Management ProxyCircular dated as of December 16, 2008. 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


The following is a list of Avalon's subsidiaries except for unnamed subsidiaries
which considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a
significant subsidiary.

   Subsidiarv Name                                    State of Incorporation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

..  American Landfill Management, Inc                         Ohio
..  American Waste Management Services, Inc.                  Ohio
..  Avalon Lakes Golf, Inc.                                   Ohio
     .  Avalon Travel, Inc.                                  Ohio
..  AWS Remediation, Inc.                                     Pennsylvania
..  DartAmericA, Inc.                                         Ohio
     .  Dart Trucking Company, Inc.                          Ohio
          - Dart Realty, Inc.                                Ohio
          - Dart Services, Inc.                              Ohio
     .  TRB National Systems, Inc.                           Ohio
..  Earth Sciences Consultants, Inc.                          Pennsylvania


Parent/subsidiary relationships are indicated by indentations. In each case,
100% of the voting securities of each of the subsidiaries is owned by the
indicated parent of such subsidiary.
<PAGE>



                                                                  Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief financial officer of Iron Age Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

         3)       the Company's 10-K fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         4)       the information contained in the Company's 10-K fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


                                    /s/ Bart R. Huchel
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Bart R. Huchel
                                    Chief Financial Officer, Vice President -
                                    Finance and Treasurer


Dated: May 12, 2003
April 4, 2011 

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell 

 OAQPS/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Classification of 

Coals by Rank (D388-05) 

The attached document is copyrighted by the ASTM; the standard covers the classification of 

coals by rank. 

Attachment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute of clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         May 24, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Residence Inn, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         AFTAB A. ANSARI, Phd, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4952.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: April 27, 2000.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-11208  Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4235 

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to include the Secretary 

of Agriculture as a member of the Committee on Foreign Investment 

in the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2020 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to include 

the Secretary of Agriculture as a member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agricultural Security 

5 Risk Review Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4235 IS

1 SEC. 2. MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN IN2 VESTMENT IN THE UNITED STATES. 

3 Section 721(k)(2) of the Defense Production Act of 

4 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4565(k)(2)) is amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (H) 

6 through (J) as subparagraphs (I) through (K), re7 spectively; and 

8 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(H) The Secretary of Agriculture.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
- 2 -

1 Caicco 39-003270 $155.30 $178.88 $0.01

2 Cobb, Sr. 54-089500 $169.90 $195.70 $0.02

3 Fincham 54-082075 $224.24 $258.29 $0.02

4 Gwin 54-152927 $90.35 $104.07 $0.01

5 Hippely 54-114550 $113.61 $130.86 $0.01

6 Lanning, 

Harold & 

Rosalie

54-153033 $16.56 $19.07 $0.01

7 Lanning, 

Marilyn

54-083850 $107.64 $123.98 $0.01

8 Mowen 54-016920 $105.02 $120.97 $0.01

9 Ohio Edison 

Co.

28-901531 $311.33 $358.60 $0.03

10 Warren R C 

Inc

38-003007 $328.75 $378.67 $0.03

TOTAL $1869.09 $0.16

The Joint Stipulation also includes the following representation: “Payment in accordance 

with paragraph 4 shall constitute a full, complete, and final resolution of all Plaintiffs’ claims and 

defenses, legal or equitable, arising out of this lawsuit, except for claims for the reimbursement 

of costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, pursuant to the Uniform Relocation 

Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act.” Id. ⁋ 6. 

The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act provides,

“The court rendering a judgment for the plaintiff in a proceeding . . . awarding compensation for 

the taking of property by a Federal agency . . . shall determine and award . . . such sum . . . 

including reasonable attorney, appraisal, and engineering fees, actually incurred because of such 

proceedings.” 42 U.S.C. § 4654(c). A complete judgment accordingly requires consideration of 

attorneys’ fees. Id. RCFC 54(b) states:

When an action presents more than one claim for relief—whether as a claim, 

counterclaim, or third-party claim—or when multiple parties are involved, the court 

may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or 

parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no reason for delay.
- 3 -

The Joint Stipulation does not settle the issue of attorneys’ fees, so the Court must enter partial 

judgment. Joint Stip. for Partial J. ⁋ 6. The Court determines “there is no reason for delay of 

judgment” for the compensation to the landowners because the remaining issue—attorneys’ 

fees—does not affect the agreed upon compensation to plaintiffs. See RCFC 54(b). 

Pursuant to RCFC 54(b) and in accordance with the Joint Stipulation, ECF No. 89, the 

Clerk is DIRECTED to enter partial judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $1,869.09 

and additional interest of $0.16 per day from 1 January 2023 through the date of payment, to 

each plaintiff as listed in Exhibit A of the Joint Stipulation. The parties SHALL FILE a joint 

status report on or before 7 July 2023 proposing a briefing schedule on plaintiffs’ request for 

attorneys’ fees or requesting another stay of proceedings on the remaining issues.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Ryan T. Holte

RYAN T. HOLTE 

Judge
#### § 27.391 General.

Each auxiliary rotor, each fixed or movable stabilizing or control surface, and each system operating any flight control must meet the requirements of §§ 27.395, 27.397, 27.399, 27.411, and 27.427.

[Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 7999, Mar. 6, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 27-34, 62 FR 46173, Aug. 29, 1997]
# Yuneec Q500 Typhoon

1 | P a g e 

# PRODUCT SPECIFICATIO NS

o Flight Time Up to 25 Minutes

o Height 240mm (9.45 in)

o Width 420mm (16.54 in)

o Diagonal Length Without Rotor Blades 565mm (22.2 in)

o Propeller/Main Rotor Diameter 330mm (13.0 in)

o Weight Without Battery an d Payload 1130g (40.0 oz)

o Battery 5400mAh 3S 11.1V LiPo (included)

o Charger 3S 11.1V LiPo DC Balancing Smart Charger with AC Adapter (included)

o Transmitter 10

- channel 2.4GHz with 5.8GHz video downlink (included)

o 3 Flight Modes Smart, Angle and Home Modes

o Maximum Flying Height Default 400 Feet Above Ground Level (Adjustable via the Q500 GUI)

o Maximum Rotational Velocity 65°/s

o Maximum Bank Angle 35°

o Maximum Climb Rate in Smart and Angle mode 3m/s

o Maximum Descent Rate in Smart and Angle mode 2m/s

o Takeoff Weigh t With Battery and CGO2

- GB 1700g (60.0 oz)

o Radio Control Frequency Band 2.4GHz

# Yuneec Q500 Typhoon

2 | P a g e

 

### CGO2

- GB Camera Gimbal System

o Focusing System Aerial Optimized Fixed Focus

o Video Resolution FULL HD 1080p

- Adjustable 60, 50 or 48 FPS

o Photo Resolution 12 Megapixels

o Video Field of View 130°

o Control Angle Accuracy ±0.02°

o White Balance Automatic Smart White Balance Feature

o Transmission Band 5.8GHz

o Input/Operating Voltage 7.0V to 14.0V DC

o Video Transmission Distance/Range (Optimum Conditions) FCC Compliance: Up to 600m (1968.5 ft) CE Compliance: Up to 300m (984.252 ft) with ST10 Warning: You Must Follow Local Laws and Maintain Visual Line of Sight of Aircraft at All Times.

o Current Consumption/Operating Current 500mA (average) to 600mA (peak) @ 12.0V (7.2W max)

o Storage Temperature

- 20°C

- 60°C

o Working Temperature 0°C

- 50°C

o Storage (memory) microSD Class 10 ~ 4 to 128GB

o Height 115mm (4.5 in)

o Weight 185g (6.5 oz)

o Depth 135mm (1.4 in)

o Width 74mm (2.9 in)

# Yuneec Q500 Typhoon

3 | P a g e

 

### ST10 Personal Ground Station

o Operating System

AndroidTM

o Number of Channels 10

o Control Transmission Distance/Range (Optimum Conditions) FCC Compliance: Up to 800m (2624.67 ft) CE Compliance: Up to 400m (1312.34 ft) Warning: You Must Follow Local Laws and Maintain Visual Line of Sight of Aircraft at All Times.

o Robust Radio Control Modulation Yuneec Protocol

o Video link Frequency Band 5.8GHz

o Video Transmission Distance/Range (Optimum Conditions) FCC Compliance: Up to 600m (1968.5 ft) CE Compliance: Up to 300m (984.252 ft) Warning: You Must Follow Local Laws and Maintain Visual Line of Sight of Aircraft at All Times.

o Flight Systems Telemetry Data On Screen Display (OSD) Yes

o LED Backlit LCD Screen Capacitive Multi

- Touch 4.5”

o Tactile (Vibrating) and Audible Feedback Yes

o Built

- In LiPo Battery Voltage / Capacity 3.6V/5200mAh 18.72Wh

o Charger Auto

- Charge Mode via Micro

- B USB Cable with AC to 5V DC USB Power Supply (Included)