alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-3 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Assigment Agreement for Pensioners Page 1 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-3 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Assigment Agreement for Pensioners Page 2 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-3 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Assigment Agreement for Pensioners Page 3 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-3 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Assigment Agreement for Pensioners Page 4 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-3 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Assigment Agreement for Pensioners Page 5 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-3 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Assigment Agreement for Pensioners Page 6 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-3 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Assigment Agreement for Pensioners Page 7 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-3 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Assigment Agreement for Pensioners Page 8 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-3 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Assigment Agreement for Pensioners Page 9 of 10Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-3 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:Exhibit Assigment Agreement for Pensioners Page 10 of 10
Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 (the
Report) by CGI Group Inc. (the Company), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 22, 2011



/s/ R. David AndersonR. David AndersonExecutive Vice-President andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 8.1

Significant Subsidiaries

The following table sets forth our significant subsidiaries as of May 31, 2006:



|                                                                           |  |                              |  |                 |    
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------- | ---
|Name of Company                                                            |  | Jurisdiction ofEstablishment |  | PercentageOwned |    
|CIBSA                                                                      |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0           | %  
|Coca-Cola FEMSA                                                            |  | Mexico                       |  | 45.7            | (1)
|Propimex, S.A. de C.V.                                                     |  | Mexico                       |  | 45.7            |    
|Administración y Asesoría Integral, S.A. de C.V.                           |  | Mexico                       |  | 45.7            |    
|Corporación Interamericana de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V. (Panamco)              |  | Mexico                       |  | 45.7            |    
|Panamco México, S.A. de C.V.                                               |  | Mexico                       |  | 45.4            |    
|Panamco Bajío, S.A. de C.V.                                                |  | Mexico                       |  | 43.6            |    
|Kristine Oversease, S.A. de C.V. (holding company of Brazilian operations) |  | Mexico                       |  | 38.0            |    
|Emprex                                                                     |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0           |    
|FEMSA Cerveza                                                              |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0           |    
|Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.                              |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0           |    
|Cervezas Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.                                |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0           |    
|FEMSA Comercio                                                             |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0           |    
|Cadena Comercial Oxxo, S.A. de C.V.                                        |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0           |    
|Oxxo Express, S.A. de C.V.                                                 |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0           |    

---

|(1) | Percentage of capital stock. FEMSA owns 53.6% of the capital stock with full voting rights.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

PROMESA

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND Title III

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as a representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al. (Jointly Administered)

Debtors

 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

NOW comes creditor JETSTREAM FEDERAL CREDIT UNION represented by the

undersigned attorney, to state as follows.

That pursuant to provisions of Rule 9010(b) of Bankruptcy Procedure, the appearing party 

notifies that it has retained the legal services of Osvaldo Toledo Martinez whose address is:

Osvaldo Toledo Martínez

PO Box 190938

San Juan PR 00919-0938

E-Mail: toledo.bankruptcy@gmail.com

Telephone No.: (787) 756-6395

Fax No.: (787) 767-7965

WHEREFORE, the appearing party respectfully prays that the Clerk of the Court takes notice of 

the appearance of the undersigned attorney and to notify him of all the proceedings in this case, 

including but not limited to copies of the petition, schedules, motions, and statements filed or to be filed 

in the above-referenced case and further prays that the name and address be added to the Master 

Address List kept in the above-captioned case.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3376 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 10:31:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and exact copy of the foregoing was filed electronically with 

the clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which in turn will send notification of such filing to all 

interested parties of record.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

At San Juan, Puerto Rico, this June 29, 2018.

/S/ Osvaldo Toledo Martínez

OSVALDO TOLEDO MARTÍNEZ, ESQ.

USDC No. 127905

PO Box 190938

San Juan PR 00919-0938

Tel: (787) 756-6395

Fax: (787) 767-7965

E-Mail: toledo.bankruptcy@gmail.com

Counsel for Creditor

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3376 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 10:31:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, David O. Cole, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the periodic report, to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC upon request.







Date:  April 20, 2009



By: /s/ David O. Cole



David O. Cole



Chief Financial Officer
BULLETIN 1047-B
PLATE 5

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

SNOwssINOGYVD

©
ease g r
— 3 8
AYWNYALYNO NWINVATASNN&d eSBs 2 . 3 be
——"* ad 225 5 = 3 4
2S 6 gs £ 8 a
Os 3 5 ag
35. g BS s a os
s S88 iy 2 § 2
3 = é s a g
g gt S33 4 5 3 a 8 6438
8 fs ged a gS aq @ a a.
Zz g |= gs Fh & B23 ° g s 3 ss
* & as HESS S 3g rs y 8 5
ie) 2B 8 2 |e lees | 2885 3 asi x 5 S sou yt S 55
E a S S | 3 Bs gers a 1S5S 3 So gs Sees Zadu S a
< EI 8. z BH g a3 1 &¥e8s 3 (isd8os ee gece tet eas By <5
Zz sit 3 ene 5 |g go 9 838858 |[m>s og e238, Saeewst es Sass (OS 38
& at a 5 | qo Soz hs a = ee Bnd asa28S S898 x x 2e
o @ le A s 8 Q I S Zz 829884 Cass} Q
a =| 2 2 S is ca Lso38 a A= aSBSSSqG8SESSFC8 ws 28
-i Z| 3 3 a Me ees fp oSe.S fy eS On Or eat eve Lee ee 3 £3
S 5 3 3 (3 |; Be | s88e8 & [Ses ee8aseengesgeeSes os ze
4 a 3 ee | #8 | E5232 cs) Sse PS lf Ste geese 8ohse EI ss
W i 8 #8 ee a se) 5 SSi see xe RECHSSES RERs S oy
s 35 BSE 2 Bisse see aoeeagese sorts 8 2s
& 38 mS Ss € SSHSOSUsS mes B&H eI ae} a=
5 mS sine 5 S HAZ ESAMERE CA ATEA 3 23
= ZESA Soe ee eFce a ae ag ge 8 S
Sey z se Eeescriets sess ts A gs
BESS 8 g gs
S&=s s s =o $
S538 38 4S 8 e
a S UoYynuLstof ynYyIwesg ay} Ur A of
. spaq flay 1ayj0 puv spaq 1D0D Or
A Oy
Pe
é

(005 9:1 FTUASLNIV A)

BOS
Se

Geology mapped in 1952, 1953, and 1958

by W. L. Adkison and J. E. Johnston

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, D. ¢.—61179

I
ps) Ag
{5 s
ie = 3
v Gas ry IG < S
Sy emma
x Ry aN aE
<3
a
5 -
isn
a
O4 |
Az
el
ef
= _
: ie g
| © Bo 3
2 wa 8
= —
a8
nz
se |
4, c
a
AZ
25
Roe) Z6
4 as
! -
cal
iG)

EF
Yi ff

ue
Wns

Base from U.S. Geological Survey map of
Salyersville North quadrangle, 1951

83°07'30"

»
‘<
o
¢

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002:
In connection with this Quarterly Report of SpectraSite, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Mark A. Slaven, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toand for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1.  This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Date: May 9, 2005 /s/ Mark A. Slaven        Name: Mark A. Slaven   Title: Chief Financial Officer
58
§ 27.549 Fuselage, landing gear, and rotor pylon structures. ( a ) Each fuselage, landing gear, and rotor pylon structure must be designed as prescribed in this section. Resultant rotor forces may be represented as a single force applied at the rotor hub attachment point.
( b ) Each structure must be designed to withstand— ( 1 ) The critical loads prescribed in §§ 27.337 through 27.341;
( 2 ) The applicable ground loads prescribed in §§ 27.235, 27.471 through 27.485, 27.493, 27.497, 27.501, 27.505, and 27.521; and
( 3 ) The loads prescribed in § 27.547 (d)(2) and (e).
( c ) Auxiliary rotor thrust, and the balancing air and inertia loads occurring under accelerated flight conditions, must be considered.
( d ) Each engine mount and adjacent fuselage structure must be designed to withstand the loads occurring under accelerated flight and landing conditions, including engine torque.
(Secs. 604, 605, 72 Stat. 778, 49 U.S.C. 1424, 1425)
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-3, 33 FR 14105, Sept. 18, 1968]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

                  Computation of Ratios of Combined Earnings &
                      Preferred Stock Dividends to Earnings
                             (dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                                                      9 months             Fiscal Year
                                                                          Ended      Ended        Ended      Ended
                                                                         Jan. 2,    Dec. 27,     Jan. 1,    Jan. 2,
                                           FY96       FY97      FY98      1999       1997         2000       1999
                                           -----     ------   ------    --------   --------     --------   --------
<S>                                       <C>        <C>      <C>       <C>        <C>          <C>        <C>
Interest Expense(1)                        3,540     1,830     3,345      8,177      1,108       10,614     10,414
Estimated interest portion
  of rent expense                             62        55        66         74         48          110         91
                                             ---       ---       ---        ---        ---         ----        --
Fixed Charges                              3,602     1,885     3,411      8,251      1,157       10,723     10,505

Income (loss) before income tax           (1,460)    3,710     9,221     (1,561)     8,980       (4,719)    (1,320)
                                          -------   ------    ------     -------    ------       -------    -------
Earnings                                   2,142     5,595    12,632      6,690     10,137        6,004      9,185

Preferred stock dividend requirements(2)       0         0         0       (215)         0         (567)      (215)

Combined earnings & preferred stock
  dividends                                2,142     5,595    12,632      6,475     10,137        5,437      8,970

Ratio of combined earnings & preferred
  stock dividends to earnings               0.59      2.97      3.70       0.78       8.76         0.51       0.85


(1) INCLUDING AMORTIZATION OF DEFERRED
    FINANCING COSTS
(2) AFTER TAX

Earnings insufficiency                    (1,460)        0         0     (1,776)         0       (5,286)    (1,535)
</TABLE>
#### § 29.723 Shock absorption tests.

The landing inertia load factor and the reserve energy absorption capacity of the landing gear must be substantiated by the tests prescribed in §§ 29.725 and 29.727, respectively. These tests must be conducted on the complete rotorcraft or on units consisting of wheel, tire, and shock absorber in their proper relation.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent.

# SUMMARY:

The project involves proposed construction of flood control measures and ecosystem restoration measures along the Kankakee River, Yellow River, Iroquois River, and major tributaries. Alternatives under consideration include setback levees, sediment traps, wetland restoration, bank stabilization, vegetation buffers, and selective dredging at locations in several counties in northeast Illinois and northwest Indiana.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Keith Ryder, 312/353-6400 ext. 2020; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Suite 600, 111 North Canal Street; Chicago, Illinois 60606-7206.

Dated: April 21, 2000.

Peter J. Rowan, 

Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army, District Engineer.

[FR Doc. 00-11295  Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-HN-M
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 1 1 , 2014 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Aileen Roder , EPA - OGC SUBJECT: November 1 1 , 2014 Meeting with John Moore of the Natural Resources Defense

Coun ci l Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** On November 1 1 , 2014 , I met with John Moore of the Natural Resources Defense Council to discuss legal and policy issues concerning the proposed Clean Power Plan for existing power plants.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 87 / Thursday, May 4, 2000 / Presidential Documents 26115

Executive Order 13152 of May 2, 2000

Further Amendment to Executive Order 11478, Equal Employment Opportunity in Federal Government

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the

laws of the United States, and in order to provide for a uniform policy

for the Federal Government to prohibit discrimination based on an individual’s status as a parent, it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 11478,

as amended, is further amended as follows:

Section 1. Amend the first sentence of section 1 by substituting ‘‘sexual

orientation, or status as a parent.’’ for ‘‘or sexual orientation.’’

Sec. 2. Insert the following new sections 6 and 7 after section 5:

‘‘Sec. 6. ‘Status as a parent’ refers to the status of an individual who,

with respect to an individual who is under the age of 18 or who is 18

or older but is incapable of self-care because of a physical or mental disability,

is:

(a) a biological parent;

(b) an adoptive parent;

(c) a foster parent;

(d) a stepparent;

(e) a custodian of a legal ward;

(f) in loco parentis over such an individual; or

(g) actively seeking legal custody or adoption of such an individual.

‘‘Sec. 7. The Office of Personnel Management shall be authorized to develop

guidance on the provisions of this order prohibiting discrimination on the

basis of an individual’s sexual orientation or status as a parent.’’

Sec. 3. Amend section 4 by substituting ‘‘and appropriate to carry out

its responsibilities under this Order.’’ for ‘‘appropriate to carry out this

Order.’’

Sec. 4. Renumber current sections 6, 7, and 8 as sections 8, 9, and 10,

respectively.

Sec. 5. Add a section 11 to read as follows:

‘‘Sec. 11. This Executive Order does not confer any right or benefit enforceTHE WHITE HOUSE,

May 2, 2000.

able in law or equity against the United States or its representatives.’’

œ–

[FR Doc. 00–11336

Filed 5–3–00; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P
Martin , Michae l (OST) O o \ " M S - \

1..^ ^ From : RIC KKENYO N [rick.kenyon.sr@gmail.com ] • ' •SPORTATiO N Sent : Monday , November l 5 , 201 0 7:1 9 P M " ^ F TOPER/AJION S To : Martin , Michae l (OST ) Cc : linda.bustamant e ~^, ^ «, - • M m - Subject : EI S fo rMcCarth y''-':; / ! b \~

> ti : ( } \ bea rMr
. Martin , ra m writin g regardin g essentia l ai rservic e fo rth e communit yo f McCarthy
. M ywif e an d I have live d i n thi s are a s'mc e 1977
. W e ow n an d operat e th e Wrange l S t Ella s News , Kenyo n Service s an d Alpin e Meadow s o f McCarth yBAB
. 

## Regula rschedule d servic e t o McCarth yi s quit e importan t t o us . Particularl yth e mai l portio n of thi s service
. I t woul d b e extremel yinconvenien t fo ru s i f thi s servic e wa s terminated
. Than k yo u fo ryou rconsideration
. Ric k & Bonni e Kenyo n McCarth y#4 2 907-554-445 4 Ric k
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40723 Summary Calendar

ARTHUR J. THOMPSON, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DAN MORALES, Attorney General; JOHN S. APPLEMAN; GEORGE W. BUSH, JR.; WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JOHN DOE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:96-CV-770

- - - - - - - - - - February 15, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Arthur J. Thompson, Jr. (#539504), a state prisoner, has appealed the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action as frivolous. An in forma pauperis complaint may be dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) if it has no arguable basis in law or in fact. Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997); see Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992). Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) dismissals are reviewed for abuse of discretion. Siglar , 112No. 98-40723 -2- F.3d at 193. To prevail on a denial-of-access-to-the-courts claim, the claimant must show he was prejudiced by the alleged violation. Henthorn v. Swinson , 955 F.2d 351, 354 (5th Cir. 1992). The district court concluded that Thompson had failed to show that he had been prejudiced. Although Thompson argues that he should have been permitted to amend his complaint to show prejudice, Thompson has failed to state in his brief what he would have alleged in an amended complaint. Thompson argues that his complaint should not have been dismissed as frivolous because there unresolved disputed issues of material fact. Thompson does not identify those unresolved issues. Thompson complains that he should have been permitted to have free use of indigent legal supplies and services. Thompson does not argue that he was harmed because he did not have access to such supplies and services. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous. The appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Thompson is cautioned that any future frivolous appeals or pleadings filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of a sanction. Thompson should therefore review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.