alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Corporation for National and Community Service

# AGENCY:

Corporation for National and Community Service. 

# ACTION:

Notice of pre-application technical assistance conference calls. 

# SUMMARY:

We have scheduled three conference calls to provide technical assistance to organizations interested in applying for grants to support efforts to overcome the digital divide through the Learn and Serve America School-based and AmeriCorps State competitive and National Direct programs. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

To register for one of the conference calls contact Rosa Harrison, (202) 606-5000, ext. 433, TDD (202) 565-2799. For individuals with disabilities, we will make information available in alternative formats upon request. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In a notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 28, 2000 (65 FR 24920) we announced the availability of approximately $12,500,000 to award grants under the Learn and Serve America K-12 School-based and AmeriCorps State Competitive and National Direct funding streams to support efforts to help overcome the digital divide. For a copy of this notice and related materials and to access additional information about Learn and Serve America and AmeriCorps, visit our web site: http://www.nationalservice.org.                 

We have scheduled three conference calls regarding the application processes for these grants. The conference calls will assist participants in understanding the application processes and the requirements for grants made under the notice of funding availability. 

## Conference Calls 

Tuesday, May 9, 4 p.m.-5 p.m. Eastern Time 

Wednesday, May 10, 1 p.m.-2 p.m. Eastern Time 

Thursday, May 11, 12 p.m.-1 p.m. Eastern Time 

To register for one of the conference calls contact Rosa Harrison, (202) 606-5000, ext. 433, TDD (202) 565-2799. 

Dated: May 2, 2000. 

Gary Kowalczyk, 

Coordinator, National Service Programs, Corporation for National and Community Service. 

[FR Doc. 00-11286 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6050-28-U
www.moderntiredealer.com 37

Truck tire market share

Truck tire market 

is on the upswing

The state of the U.S. commercial truck tire market may not be 

as dismal as it was approximately one year ago, but conditions 

remain challenging. For all intents and purposes, the market 

was still down during the first half of 2010 as trucks continued to sit 

idle and fleets scrutinized every penny spent. These and other factors 

made maintaining and gaining market share extremely difficult propositions, as many truck tire manufacturers, marketers and distributors 

can attest.

While the market is still struggling, the worst may be over. “Freight 

is finally moving in the right direction,” says Bob Costello, chief economist for the American Trucking Associations. “I continue to hear from 

motor carriers that both the demand and supply situations are steadily 

improving.” Inventory builds are improving, albeit slightly, he adds, 

“after some sectors slashed inventories by too much in 2009.”

Original equipment orders are another indicator of a potential 

recovery. According to ACT Research, a firm that tracks commercial 

vehicle trends, back orders for commercial truck trailers have risen to 

their highest level in months. Overall, the domestic trailer industry “is 

in the early stages of a rebound from a very weak 2009.”

The Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA) is calling for increased 

medium/wide-base/heavy on-highway commercial truck tire shipment 

levels in 2010. At the OE level, shipments are expected to increase by 

nearly 8%, or approximately 180,000 additional units. On the replacement side, shipments “will realize an increase of approximately 600,000 

units in 2010 as the economy picks up and more goods are shipped,” 

according to the RMA’s most recent projections. ■

*Based on 12.5 million units. Because numbers are rounded to the nearest one-half percent, the total may not 

equal 100%. List includes truck tire manufacturers, marketers and importers.

Goodyear = 20.0%

Michelin = 19.5%

Bridgestone = 18.0%

Firestone = 7.5%

Yokohama = 6.0%

Toyo = 4.5%

General = 4.0%

Continental = 3.5%

Hankook = 3.0%

BFGoodrich = 2.0%

Double Coin = 2.0%

Dunlop = 2.0%

Roadmaster = 2.0%

Hercules = 1.5%

Dynatrac = 1.0%

Kumho = 1.0%

Sumitomo = 1.0%

Others = 4.0%

0 5 10 15 20 25

Medium/heavy 

truck tire 

market share by 

brand*

Medium/heavy truck tire 

market share by company*

Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations 

LLC

25.5%

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 22.0%

Michelin North America Inc. 21.5%

Continental Tire the Americas LLC 7.5%

Yokohama Tire Corp. 6.0%

Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. 4.5%

Hankook Tire America Corp. 3.0%

Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. 2.0%

Double Coin Holdings Ltd. 2.0%

Hercules Tire & Rubber Co. 1.5%

American Tire Distributors Inc. 1.0%

Kumho Tire U.S.A. Inc. 1.0%

Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd. 1.0%

Others 4.0%

*Based on 12.5 million units. Because numbers are 

rounded to the nearest one-half percent, the total may 

not equal 100%. List includes truck tire manufacturers, 

marketers and importers.
§ 25.367 Unsymmetrical loads due to engine failure. ( a ) The airplane must be designed for the unsymmetrical loads resulting from the failure of the critical engine. Turbopropeller airplanes must be designed for the following conditions in combination with a single malfunction of the propeller drag limiting system, considering the probable pilot corrective action on the flight controls: ( 1 ) At speeds between *V* *MC* and *V* *D,* the loads resulting from power failure because of fuel flow interruption are considered to be limit loads.
( 2 ) At speeds between *V* *MC* and *V* *C,* the loads resulting from the disconnection of the engine compressor from the turbine or from loss of the turbine blades are considered to be ultimate loads.
( 3 ) The time history of the thrust decay and drag build-up occurring as a result of the prescribed engine failures must be substantiated by test or other data applicable to the particular engine-propeller combination.
( 4 ) The timing and magnitude of the probable pilot corrective action must be conservatively estimated, considering the characteristics of the particular engine-propeller-airplane combination.
( b ) Pilot corrective action may be assumed to be initiated at the time maximum yawing velocity is reached, but not earlier than two seconds after the engine failure. The magnitude of the corrective action may be based on the control forces specified in § 25.397(b) except that lower forces may be assumed where it is shown by anaylsis or test that these forces can control the yaw and roll resulting from the prescribed engine failure conditions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                               1000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                   10,741
<SECURITIES>                             46,671
<RECEIVABLES>                            10,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                             113,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        187,804
<PP&E>                                  156,447
<DEPRECIATION>                           93,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          261,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    31,907
<BONDS>                                  61,885
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                              20,000
<COMMON>                                     58
<OTHER-SE>                              128,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            261,069
<SALES>                                 174,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        174,320
<CGS>                                   132,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           132,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         58,592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        2,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (17,224)
<INCOME-TAX>                             (7,062)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (10,162)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.62)



</TABLE>
ARKANSAS

Final Area Designations for the 

2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards

As indicated in the table below, EPA is designating Crittenden County as nonattainment for the 2008 

ozone national ambient air quality standards (2008 ozone NAAQS) and the remainder of the State as 

unclassifiable/attainment. In accordance with section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act, EPA must designate 

an area “nonattainment” if it is violating the 2008 ozone NAAQS or if it is contributing to a violation of 

the 2008 ozone NAAQS in a nearby area. An area is designated “unclassifiable/attainment” if the area 

is attaining the standard or there is not enough information to make an attainment determination. The 

rationale for the Crittenden County designation can be found in the Technical Support Document (TSD) 

for the Memphis, TN-MS-AR nonattainment area.

2008 Ozone NAAQS Designations for Counties in Arkansas 

Area

Arkansas’ Recommended 

Nonattainment Counties

EPA’s Designated

Nonattainment Counties

Arkansas None* Crittenden County 

*Revised designation recommendation for Crittenden County and Pulaski County (Little Rock area) 

submitted by the state of Arkansas to the EPA on February 23, 2012.

State Recommendations

In its March 2009 initial 2008 ozone NAAQS designation recommendation letter to EPA, Arkansas 

recommended that Crittenden County and Pulaski County be designated as nonattainment. This 

recommendation was based on ambient air quality monitoring data for the period from 2006 – 2008 that 

indicated a design values of 0.082 ppm (Crittenden County) and 0.080 ppm (Pulaski County), which 

exceed the 2008 ozone NAAQS. In its response to EPA’s recommendations for 2008 ozone 

nonattainment areas, Arkansas on February 23, 2012 withdrew its initial recommendation for 

Crittenden County and Pulaski County and submitted a revised recommendation that the Counties be 

designated as “unclassifiable/attainment.” This revised recommendation is based on certified ambient 

air quality monitoring data for the period from 2008 – 2010, which indicates monitors in the Counties 

are attaining the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The revised recommendation is in the docket for this action.

Air Quality Data

Based on 2008 – 2010 certified air quality data there are no monitors in the State that violate the 2008 

ozone standard. The 8-hour ozone design value for Pulaski County for the period from 2008 – 2010 is 

0.070 ppm (0.070 ppm at two monitoring sites and 0.067 ppm at one monitoring site). The 8-hour 

design value for Crittenden County is 0.074 ppm. The certified air quality data is in the docket for this 

action.

Conclusion

Upon evaluation of the recommendation letters received from the State of Arkansas, the most recent 

certified air quality monitoring data, and other information EPA is designating Crittenden County 

Arkansas as nonattainment and the remaining Arkansas counties comprising the Little Rock, as 

“unclassifiable/attainment” for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The rationale for the Crittenden County 

designation can be found in the TSD for the Memphis, TN-MS-AR nonattainment area.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

 

In Re: 

 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO 

as representative of 

 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO 

 

Debtor 

PROMESA 

TITLE III 

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

 In Re: 

 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO 

 

as representative of 

 

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER 

AUTOHORITY 

 

Debtor 

TITLE III 

No. 17 BK 4780-LTS 

Court Filing Relates Only to PREPA and 

Shall only be Filed Case No. 17- BK-4780 

(LTS) and Main Case 17- BK-3283 (LTS) 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

COMES NOW creditor Master Link Corporation (“ML”), through the undersigned 

counsel and very respectfully states and prays: 

1. On May 1, 2018, this Court issued Memorandum Order denying the appearing 

party’s Motion for Relief from Stay. Dkt. 2985. Notwithstanding, due to ML’s expressed concerns 

about the potential impact on its commercial prospects of the unresolved controversy as to whether 

there was a factual basis for termination and the potential for exposure to increased liability from 

execution of its performance bond, the Court encouraged the parties “...to meet and confer 

promptly to seek to develop a mutually acceptable resolution of the outstanding performance bond 

issue or, at minimum, an agreed statement regarding the nature and pendency of the stayed litigation 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3230 Filed:06/01/18 Entered:06/01/18 16:00:04 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

that can be used in connection with inquiries as ML’s bids for business.” The parties were ordered to 

file a joint status report concerning their efforts by June 4, 2018. Id., page 6. 

2. Despite the parties’ best effort, the meeting could not be coordinated within the 

time frame provided by this Honorable Court. Furthermore, the principal of ML is going to be on a 

short vacation during the last weeks of June and the undersigned will be out of Puerto Rico for a 

short vacation during the first week of July. 

3. In light of the aforementioned, the appearing party is requesting this Court to 

extend the deadline to file the joint status report by July 15th, 2018. 

 Prior to filing this motion, ML sought and received the consent of debtor for the 

extension of time requested herein. 

WHEREFORE, the herein appearing party respectfully requests the Honorable Court to 

grant the requested extension, until July 15, 2018. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this date, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to 

counsel of record. 

 In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this June 1st, 2018. 

S/Henry Vázquez Irizarry

USDC No. 205011 

Bufete Vázquez Irizarry, CSP 

Urb. Villa Fontana Park 

Calle Parque Luis M. Rivera 5 HH6 

Carolina, PR 00983 

Tel. (787) 724-7514 / 787-645-2241 

Fax (888) 518-1318 

hvilaw@gmail.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3230 Filed:06/01/18 Entered:06/01/18 16:00:04 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.1107 Inter-coolers and after-coolers.

Each inter-cooler and after-cooler must be able to withstand the vibration, inertia, and air pressure loads to which it would be subjected in operation.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4218 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4218

  To temporarily prevent emerging growth companies from losing their 
      status during the COVID-19 pandemic, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 2020

  Mr. Tillis introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To temporarily prevent emerging growth companies from losing their 
      status during the COVID-19 pandemic, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coronavirus EGC Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EMERGING GROWTH COMPANY DESIGNATION.

    (a) In General.--Any issuer that was an emerging growth company 
during the entire period beginning on March 13, 2020, and ending on the 
date of enactment of this Act shall be deemed an emerging growth 
company until the later of--
            (1) the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of 
        this Act;
            (2) the end of the incident period for the emergency 
        declared by the President under section 501(b) of the Robert T. 
        Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
        U.S.C. 5191(b)) with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 
        (COVID-19); and
            (3) the date on which the issuer would cease being an 
        emerging growth company absent the application of this section.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``emerging growth 
company'' and ``issuer'' have the meanings given those terms in section 
3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 147.29 Display of certificate.

A certificated aviation maintenance technician school must display its aviation maintenance technician school certificate at a place in each location of the school, including the primary location and any additional fixed locations, that is visible by and normally accessible to the public.
Attachment 12Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:24634-13   Filed:06/22/23   Entered:06/22/23 18:57:29    Desc: Attachment 12   Page 1 of 1
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-16-2007

Chukwu v. Atty Gen USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 05-4068

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Chukwu v. Atty Gen USA" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1162.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1162
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 05-4068

_______________

BREDAN CHIMA CHUKWU,

 Petitioner,

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES;

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

HOMELAND SECURITY,

 Respondents

_____________

ORDER

_____________

At the direction of the Court, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the opinion filed on

April 13, 2007 is hereby vacated due to formatting and typographical errors. A revised

opinion shall be issued this date.

For the Court, 

Marcia M. Waldron, 

Clerk

Dated: April 16, 2007
Exhibit 3.2

                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE
                AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                          OF PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC.

                            ------------------------

                     Pursuant to Section 242 of the General
                    Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

                            ------------------------

      PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC., a corporation duly organized and existing under
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), does
hereby certify that:

      FIRST: The first paragraph of Article FOURTH of the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as follows:

      "The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the
      corporation shall have authority to issue is Ninety-Two Million Five
      Hundred Thousand (92,500,000) consisting of: (i) Seven Million Five
      Hundred Thousand (7,500,000) shares of Class A Common Stock of the par
      value of One Cent ($.01) per share, (ii) Seventy-Five Million (75,000,000)
      shares of Class B Common Stock of the par value of One Cent ($.01) per
      share and (iii) Ten Million (10,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock of the
      par value of One Cent ($.01) per share."

      SECOND: The foregoing amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Playboy Enterprises, Inc. has caused this Certificate
of Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 13th day of May,
2004.

                                  PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC.


                                  By: /s/ Howard Shapiro
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Name: Howard Shapiro
                                      Title: Executive Vice President, Law and
                                             Administration, General Counsel and
                                             Secretary
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN N. MCCOY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 293 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24813 Filed:07/21/23 Entered:07/28/23 12:05:28 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24813 Filed:07/21/23 Entered:07/28/23 12:05:28 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 29.1011 Engines: general. ( a ) Each engine must have an independent oil system that can supply it with an appropriate quantity of oil at a temperature not above that safe for continuous operation.
( b ) The usable oil capacity of each system may not be less than the product of the endurance of the rotorcraft under critical operating conditions and the maximum allowable oil consumption of the engine under the same conditions, plus a suitable margin to ensure adequate circulation and cooling. Instead of a rational analysis of endurance and consumption, a usable oil capacity of one gallon for each 40 gallons of usable fuel may be used for reciprocating engine installations.
( c ) Oil-fuel ratios lower than those prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section may be used if they are substantiated by data on the oil consumption of the engine.
( d ) The ability of the engine and oil cooling provisions to maintain the oil temperature at or below the maximum established value must be shown under the applicable requirements of §§ 29.1041 through 29.1049.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34218, Sept. 2, 1988]