alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number 

and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are 

the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto 

Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the 

Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 

(“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780 LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., 

 Debtors.1 

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as representative of 

THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF 

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE 

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO 

 Debtor. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

x 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

x 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 03566-LTS 

 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2599-1 Filed:02/27/18 Entered:02/27/18 15:37:02 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL 

 AND NOW, this ____ day of ________________________, 2018, upon consideration of 

the Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel to the Employees Retirement System of the

Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Motion to Withdraw”), it is HEREBY 

ORDERED as follows: 

1. The Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED; 

2. Effective immediately, it is hereby ORDERED that DLA Piper LLP (US) and 

DLA (Puerto Rico) LLC shall be deemed to have withdrawn as counsel to the Employees 

Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and shall be 

removed from the Electronic Case Filing notification list in the above-referenced Title III cases. 

SO ORDERED. 

 ____________________________________ 

 HON. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2599-1 Filed:02/27/18 Entered:02/27/18 15:37:02 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 2 of 2
October 19, 2017

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF D.L.T., JR., A CHILD

NO. 14-17-00376-CV

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed May 

4, 2017, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and 

find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below 

AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.
BILL OF EXCEPTIONS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

May, 1898.]

Cox, Smith and Swing, JJ.

#### *The Upham Manufacturing Co. v. Gibson & Warrington.

Triar Judge roses Jurisdiction Overa Birr of Exceptions, When—

The trial judge loses jurisdiction over a bill of exceptions which is not presented until forty-five days after the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

*

See *ante*127.

Swing, J.

We see no reason to change the decision heretofore announced by us in this case as to striking the bill of exceptions from the files and therefore affirming the judgment, as all the errors relied on arise out of the bill of exceptions. The record as corrected shows that the motion for a new trial was overruled July 22, instead of June 29. The bill of *372■exceptions was signed and filed September 9, this was forty-nine days from the date of the overruling of the motion for a new trial. The ■record recites, on the 9th of September: “Now comes and presents this its bill of exceptions.” The law requires it to be presented to the Judge .at least five days before the expiration of the fifty days, and this our ;Supretne Court has held is jurisdictional, and that unless so presented, •the judge loses jurisdiction to sign the bill. This entry clearly shows that it was not presented until the forty-ninth day.

*Major H. P. Lloyd,*for plaintiffs in error.

*IV. IV. Prather,*for defendants in error.
P.1 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

43) IV-E-38 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/200811:57:59 AM Sheet 43 of 117 
P.2 

A-90-37 

•>loJ I 0 : • • 

EPrt AIR COCKZT 

Date: September 21,1999 

To: Air and Radiation Docket # A-90-37 

From: Dennis Crumpler, Integrated Implementation Group, 

ITPID, MD-12 

Re: Meeting with Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA) 

On September 8, 1999, Messrs. Ernie Rosenberg and Ted Cromwell ofthe CMA met 

with several offices of EPA (attendee list is below). The discussion focused on how emission 

controls on existing units might create more flexibility for the more general new source review 

(NSR) applicability provisions being considered in NSR Reform rulemaking. There was brief 

mention of concerns that still remain with the Class I area provisions that were proposed in July 

1996. 

cc: Pam Smith, (MD-12) 

Jon Devine, OGC 

Attendees: 

Ted Cromwell, CMA 

Ernie Rosenberg, CMA 

Bill Harnett, OAQPS 

David Solomon, OAQPS 

Dennis Crumpler, OAQPS 

Mike Sewell, OAQPS 

Karen Blanchard, OAQPS 

Rich Biondi, OECA (via telephone) 

David Svendsgaard, OAQPS 

Anna Wood, OPAR (via telephone) 

Jon Devine, OGC (via telephone) 

Dan deRoeck, OAQPS 

EPA Office Abbreviations: OAQPS- Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; OGC--

Office of General Counsel; OECA-Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance; and 

OPAR-Office of Policy Analysis and Regulations.
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I,David G. Lloyd, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bertucci’s Corporation;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             TheRegistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))[omitted] for the Registrant and have:

 

a.       designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.      [omitted]

 

c.       evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

d.      disclosedin this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             TheRegistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

a.       allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b.      anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  March 28, 2006 |                                  |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                  | By:                                   |   /s/  David G. Lloyd |   |
|                  | David  G. Lloyd                       |
|                  | Chief  Financial Officer and Director |

 

----
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3232

_____________________________
L EE A NSLEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Tatiana Salvador , Judge

. April 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , R AY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Lee Ansley, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 30046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11427]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[FRL-6600-5]


West Virginia: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste 
Management Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: West Virginia has applied to EPA for Final authorization of 
the changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant final 
authorization to West Virginia. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' 
section of this Federal Register, EPA is authorizing the changes by an 
immediate final rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior to the 
immediate final rule because we believe this action is not 
controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. We have 
explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to the 
immediate final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this 
authorization during the comment period, the immediate final rule will 
become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not take 
further action on this proposal. If we get comments that oppose this 
action, we will withdraw the immediate final rule and it will not take 
effect. We will then respond to public comments in a later final rule 
based on this proposal. You may not have another opportunity for 
comment. If you want to comment on this action, you must do so at this 
time.

DATES: Send your written comments by June 9, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Sharon McCauley, Mailcode 3WC21, 
RCRA State Programs Branch, U.S. EPA Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 
Philadelphia, PA 19103, Phone number: (215) 814-3376. You can examine 
copies of the materials submitted by West Virginia during normal 
business hours at the following locations: EPA Region III Library, 2nd 
Floor, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Phone number: (215) 
814-5254; or West Virginia Division of Environmental Protection, Office 
of Waste Management, 1356 Hansford Street, Charleston, WV 25301-1401, 
Phone number: (304) 558-4253.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon McCauley at the above address 
and phone number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
immediate final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section 
of this Federal Register.

Bradley M. Campbell,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 00-11427 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                 Amendment No. 1 to Corporate Services Agreement
                 -----------------------------------------------

         This Amendment to Corporate Services Agreement (this "Amendment") is
made as of January 1, 2003 between Metaldyne Corporation ("Metaldyne"), a
Delaware Corporation, and TriMas Corporation, a Delaware Corporation ("TriMas").

         WHEREAS, Metaldyne and TriMas have entered into a Corporate Services
Agreement dated as of June 6, 2002 (the "Corporate Services Agreement");

         WHEREAS, Metaldyne and TriMas have agreed to amend the Corporate
Services Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
covenants set forth herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.   Definitions. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have
     the same meaning as set forth in the Corporate Services Agreement.

2.   Amendment. Effective January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, TriMas will
     pay Metaldyne an annual fee of $2.5 million for the Services, payable in
     advance in equal quarterly installments of $625,000, without deduction for
     the cost of any of the Services that are assumed directly by TriMas or any
     of its subsidiaries.

3.   Counterparts; Conflicts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of
     counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same
     instrument, and any one of the parties hereto may execute this Amendment by
     signing any such counterpart. In the event of ambiguity or conflict between
     the terms, conditions, or provisions of the Corporate Services Agreement
     and this Amendment, the terms, conditions, and provisions of this Amendment
     shall control.

4.   Acknowledgment. Except as expressly set forth herein, all terms of the
     Corporate Services Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first above written.

TRIMAS CORPORATION                      METALDYNE CORPORATION

By: /s/Grant H. Beard                   By: /s/William M. Lowe, Jr.
    -----------------                       -----------------------
     Name: Grant H. Beard                   Name:  William M. Lowe, Jr.
     Title: President and Chief             Title: Executive Vice President and
     Executive Officer                             Chief Financial Officer
DPR MODIFIED PROMESA B1040 (FORM 1040) (05/17) 

PROMESA COVER SHEET

(Instructions on Reverse)

CASE NUMBER

(Court Use Only)

PLAINTIFFS (DEBTOR, if Title III Petition;

ISSUER, if Title VI Application)

DEFENDANTS

ATTORNEYS (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone 

No.)

ATTORNEYS (If Known)

PARTY (Check One Box Only)

  Debtor

  Creditor

  Trustee

  U.S. Trustee/Bankruptcy Admin

  Other

PARTY (Check One Box Only)

  Debtor

  Creditor

  Trustee

  U.S. Trustee/Bankruptcy Admin

  Other

CAUSE OF ACTION (WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE OF ACTION, INCLUDING ALL U.S. STATUTES INVOLVED)

NATURE OF SUIT

 PROMESA Title III Petition  PROMESA Title VI Application for Approval of Modifications 

 Other Federal Question  Adversary Proceeding  Demand $ __________

If Adversary Proceeding is checked, number up to five (5) boxes starting with lead cause of action as 1, first 

alternative cause as 2, second alternative cause as 3, etc., below:

FRBP 7001(1) – Recovery of Money/Property

 11-Recovery of money/property - §542 turnover of 

property

 12-Recovery of money/property - §547 preference

 13-Recovery of money/property - §548 fraudulent 

transfer

 14-Recovery of money/property – other

FRBP 7001(2) - Validity, Priority or Extent of Lien

 21-Validity, priority or extent of lien or other interest 

in property

FRBP 7001(5) – Revocation of Confirmation

 51-Revocation of confirmation

FRBP 7001(7) – Injunctive Relief 

 71-Injunctive relief - imposition of stay

 72-Injunctive relief - other 

FRBP 7001(8) Subordination of Claim or Interest

 81-Subordination of claim or interest

FRBP 7001(9) Declaratory Judgment

 91-Declaratory judgment

FRBP 7001(10) Determination of Removed Action

 01-Determination of removed claim or cause

Other

 02-Other (e.g. other actions that would have been 

brought in state court if unrelated to bankruptcy case) 

TITLE III CASE IN WHICH THIS ADVERSARY PROCEEDING ARISES

NAME OF DEBTOR CASE NO.

DISTRICT IN WHICH CASE IS PENDING DIVISION OFFICE NAME OF JUDGE

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3435-8 Filed:07/05/18 Entered:07/05/18 13:08:30 Desc:

PROMESA Cover Sheet Page 1 of 2
DPR MODIFIED PROMESA B1040 (FORM 1040) (05/17)

RELATED ADVERSARY PROCEEDING (IF ANY)

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT ADVERSARY

PROCEEDING NO.

DISTRICT IN WHICH CASE IS PENDING DIVISION OFFICE NAME OF JUDGE

SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF)

DATE PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF)

THIS FORM IS TO BE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR FILINGS RELATING TO THE PUERTO RICO OVERSIGHT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC STABILITY 

ACT (PROMESA). FOR ADMINISTRATION PURPOSES ONLY, THE PUBLIC DOCKETS FOR PROMESA PROCEEDINGS UNDER TITLE III AND 

ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS WILL BE MAINTAINED ON THE CASE MANAGEMENT/ELECTRONIC CASE FILING (CM/ECF) SYSTEM OF THE UNITED 

STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO. THESE CASES ARE UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES 

DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3435-8 Filed:07/05/18 Entered:07/05/18 13:08:30 Desc:

PROMESA Cover Sheet Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 21.1

The following is a list of Avalons subsidiaries except for unnamed subsidiaries which considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.



|                                                |  |                       
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Subsidiary Name                                 |  | State of Incorporation
|      American Landfill Management, Inc.       |  | Ohio                  
|      American Waste Management Services, Inc. |  | Ohio                  
|      Avalon Golf and Country Club, Inc.       |  | Ohio                  
|      Avalon Lakes Golf, Inc.                  |  | Ohio                  
|      Avalon Travel, Inc.                      |  | Ohio                  
|      TBG, Inc.                                |  | Ohio                  

Parent/subsidiary relationships are indicated by indentations. In each case, 100% of the voting securities of each
of the subsidiaries is owned by the indicated parent of such subsidiary.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of aQuantive, Inc. (the "COMPANY") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "FORM 10-Q"), I, Michael Vernon, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 9, 2005

                                             /s/ MICHAEL VERNON
                                             -----------------------------
                                                 Michael Vernon
                                             Chief Financial Officer

                                       38
180720 ORDER RE ERS LIFT STAY HRGS.DOCX VERSION JULY 20, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER SCHEDULING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL HEARINGS 

REGARDING MOTION OF CERTAIN SECURED CREDITORS OF THE 

EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE 

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY

The Court has received and reviewed the Motion of Certain Secured Creditors of 

the Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico for 

Relief from the Automatic Stay (Docket Entry No. 3418 in Case No. 17-3283, the “Motion”),

filed by certain bondholders of the Employee Retirement System, and briefing submitted in 

relation to the Motion. 

For the reasons that will be explained on the record at the Omnibus Hearing 

scheduled for July 25, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. (Atlantic Standard Time) (the “July Omnibus 

Hearing”) the oral argument on the Motion scheduled for the July Omnibus Hearing will be a 

preliminary hearing pursuant to section 362(e)(1) of title 11 of the United States Code. A final 

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation 

Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 

(“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to 

software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3654 Filed:07/20/18 Entered:07/20/18 11:53:07 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
180720 ORDER RE ERS LIFT STAY HRGS.DOCX VERSION JULY 20, 2018 2

hearing on the Motion will be held at the Omnibus Hearing scheduled for September 12, 2018

at 9:30 a.m. (Atlantic Standard Time).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 20, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3654 Filed:07/20/18 Entered:07/20/18 11:53:07 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2