alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.37

                  AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 ("Amendment") is made as of the 5th day of April, 2001, to
the Employment Agreement, made as of the 30th day of April, 2000 (the
"Employment Agreement"), by and between ValueVision International, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Employer"), and Nathan Fagre
(hereinafter referred to as "Employee").

                                    WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, Employer and Employee mutually desire to amend the provisions of the
Employment Agreement as set forth below;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises contained
in this Amendment, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1.   The first sentence of Section 2 "Term" of the Employment Agreement is
          hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: "The term of
          Employee's employment hereunder shall commence on the date hereof and
          shall continue on a full-time basis until April 30, 2004."

This Amendment shall become effective as of the date first above written.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed or caused this Amendment to
be executed as of the day, month and year first above written.


EMPLOYER:                             VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC.



                                      By: /s/ Gene McCaffery
                                         _______________________________________
                                         Gene McCaffery
                                         Its: Chief Executive Officer


EMPLOYEE:                             By: /s/ Nathan Fagre
                                         _______________________________________
                                         Nathan Fagre
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4116 

AN ACT 

To extend the authority for commitments for the paycheck 

protection program and separate amounts authorized for 

other loans under section 7(a) of the Small Business 

Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4116 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENDING AUTHORITY FOR COMMITMENTS 

2 FOR THE PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM 

3 AND SEPARATING AMOUNTS AUTHORIZED 

4 FOR OTHER 7(A) LOANS. 

5 Section 1102(b) of title I of division A of the 

6 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (Pub7 lic Law 116–136) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(b) COMMITMENTS FOR PPP AND OTHER 7(A) 

9 LOANS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) PPP LOANS.—During the period begin11 ning on February 15, 2020 and ending on August 

12 8, 2020, the amount authorized for commitments 

13 under paragraph (36) of section 7(a) of the Small 

14 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) shall be 

15 $659,000,000,000. 

16 ‘‘(2) OTHER 7(A) LOANS.—During fiscal year 

17 2020, the amount authorized for commitments for 

18 section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

19 636(a)) under the heading ‘BUSINESS LOANS PRO20 GRAM ACCOUNT’ under the heading ‘SMALL BUSI21 NESS ADMINISTRATION’ under title V of the Consoli22 dated Appropriations Act, 2020 (Public Law 116– 

23 93; 133 Stat. 2475) shall apply with respect to any 
3 

†S 4116 ES

1 commitments under such section 7(a) other than 

2 under paragraph (36) of such section 7(a).’’. 

Passed the Senate June 30, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4116 

AN ACT 

To extend the authority for commitments for the 

purposes. 7(a) of the Small Business Act, and for other amounts authorized for other loans under section paycheck protection program and separate
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 405 

To require publication of the annual reports required under the Presidential 

Orders on Buy American and Hire American and Strengthening BuyAmerican Preferences for Infrastructure Projects. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. SMITH, Mr. MURPHY, and 

Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require publication of the annual reports required under 

the Presidential Orders on Buy American and Hire 

American and Strengthening Buy-American Preferences 

for Infrastructure Projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Buying American 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 405 IS

1 SEC. 2. PUBLICATION OF ANNUAL REPORTS ON BUY AMER2 ICAN AND HIRE AMERICAN COMPLIANCE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The head of each agency required 

4 to submit reports under Executive Order 13788, entitled 

5 ‘‘Buy American and Hire American’’, (or any successor 

6 order) shall make each report available to the public, and 

7 submit each report to Congress, at the same time the head 

8 of the agency submits the report to the Secretary of Com9 merce and Director of the Office of Management and 

10 Budget. 

11 (b) PUBLICATION OF PREVIOUS REPORTS.—Not 

12 later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 

13 Act, the head of each agency that was previously required 

14 to submit a report under Executive Order 13788 shall 

15 make each such report available to the public, and submit 

16 each such report to Congress. 

17 SEC. 3. PUBLICATION OF REPORTS IDENTIFYING OPPOR18 TUNITIES TO MAXIMIZE THE USE OF BUY 

19 AMERICAN PRINCIPLES. 

20 The head of each agency required to submit a report 

21 under Executive Order 13858, entitled ‘‘Strengthening 

22 Buy-American Preferences for Infrastructure Projects’’, 

23 (or any successor order) shall make the report available 

24 to the public, and submit the report to Congress, at the 

25 same time the head of the agency submits the report to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 405 IS

1 the President or the Assistant to the President for Trade 

2 and Manufacturing Policy. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., 

Debtors1

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY 

(“PREPA”) 

Debtor. 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17-BK03283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17-BK4780-LTS 

 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW LEGAL REPRESENTATION 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

COMES NOW Joshua Rodriguez Rivera as counsel for Syncora Guarantee, Inc. 

(“Syncora”) and very respectfully states and prays as follows: 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last four (4) 

digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(the “Commonwealth”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) 

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17- BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy 

Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the 

Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17- BK-3566-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-

BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority 

(“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case 

numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24688 Filed:06/28/23 Entered:06/28/23 18:24:48 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

1. As of today, June 28, 2023, I will no longer be an associate at Reichard & Escalera 

LLC, and thus will no longer be able to continue my representation of Syncora. 

2. Syncora is aware of and consents to my withdrawal as counsel. 

3. Syncora will continue to be represented in this matter by its current counsel of 

record and attorneys who have entered appearances on behalf of Syncora. 

WHEREFORE the undersigned respectfully requests from this Honorable Court 

leave to withdraw from her representation of Syncora. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. 

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this June 28, 2023. 

REICHARD & ESCALERA 

MCS Plaza, Suite 1000 

255 Ave. Ponce de León 

Hato Rey, PR 00918 

P.O. Box 364148 

San Juan, PR 00936-4148 

Tel: (787) 777-8888/777-8812 

Fax: (787) 765-4225 

/S/JOSHUA RODRÍGUEZ-RIVERA 

U.S.D.C. No. 308601 

E-mail: jrodriguez@reichardescalera.com 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24688 Filed:06/28/23 Entered:06/28/23 18:24:48 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 25.1545 Airspeed limitation information.

The airspeed limitations required by § 25.1583 (a) must be easily read and understood by the flight crew.
§ 158.43 Public agency notification to collect PFC's. ( a ) Following approval of an application to impose a PFC under subpart B of this part, the public agency shall notify the air carriers and foreign air carriers required to collect PFC's at its airport of the Administrator's approval. Each notified carrier shall notify its agents, including other issuing carriers, of the collection requirement.
( b ) The notification shall be in writing and contain at a minimum the following information: ( 1 ) The level of PFC to be imposed.
( 2 ) The total revenue to be collected.
( 3 ) The charge effective date will always be the first day of the month; however, it must be at least 30 days after the date the public agency notified the air carriers of the FAA's approval to impose the PFC.
( 4 ) The proposed charge expiration date.
( 5 ) A copy of the Administrator's notice of approval.
( 6 ) The address where remittances and reports are to be filed by carriers.
( c ) The public agency must notify air carriers required to collect PFCs at its airport and the FAA of changes in the charge expiration date at least 30 days before the existing charge expiration date or new charge expiration date, whichever comes first. Each notified air carrier must notify its agents, including other issuing carriers, of such changes.
( d ) The public agency shall provide a copy of the notification to the appropriate FAA Airports office.
[Doc. No. 26385, 56 FR 24278, May 29, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 158-4, 72 FR 28849, May 23, 2007]
#### § 271.1 Purpose.

This part establishes the guidelines required by 49 U.S.C. 41736 to be used by the Department in establishing the fair and reasonable amount of compensation needed to ensure the continuation of essential air service to an eligible place under 49 U.S.C. 41731 and 41734. These guidelines are intended to cover normal carrier selection cases and rate renewal cases, and not necessarily emergency carrier selection cases.

[60 FR 43524, Aug. 22, 1995]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10476 Summary Calendar

TRAVIS RIPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN J. CALLAHAN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:93-CV-495-A

- - - - - - - - - - March 28, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Travis Ripley appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Ripley’s attorney did not timely present the new evidence which this court found relevant to the determination whether Ripley is disabled; instead, counsel filed the evidence, without explanation or argument, in an exhibit to his objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Consequently, thedistrict court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the

Commissioner’s failure to request a remand for consideration of the new evidence was substantially justified. Bazaldua v. INS , 776 F.2d 1266, 1269 (1985). We also find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s rejection of Ripley’s arguments that an award of attorney fees is required because of the Administrative Law Judge’s failure to develop the record or consider Ripley’s testimony concerning the limitations he experienced due to his back problems.
AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 23, 2023

No. 04-23-00033-CR

IN RE Christian Prieto PRIETO

Original Mandamus Proceeding

ORDER

Relators moved to consolidate this original proceeding with Cause Nos. 04-23-00028-

CR, 04-23-00029-CR, 04-23-00030-CR, 04-23-00031-CR, 04-23-00032-CR, 04-23-00033-CR, 

04-23-00034-CR, 04-23-00035-CR, 04-23-00036-CR, 04-23-00037-CR, 04-23-00038-CR, 04-

23-00039-CR, 04-23-00040-CR, 04-23-00041-CR, 04-23-00042-CR, 04-23-00043-CR, 04-23-

00044-CR, 04-23-00045-CR, 04-23-00046-CR, 04-23-00047-CR, and 04-23-00051-CR. Real 

party in interest is not opposed to the motions. Having considered the motions, we GRANT 

relators’ motions to consolidate. 

We ORDER Cause Nos. 04-23-00028-CR, 04-23-00029-CR, 04-23-00030-CR, 04-23-

00031-CR, 04-23-00032-CR, 04-23-00033-CR, 04-23-00034-CR, 04-23-00035-CR, 04-23-

00036-CR, 04-23-00037-CR, 04-23-00038-CR, 04-23-00039-CR, 04-23-00040-CR, 04-23-

00041-CR, 04-23-00042-CR, 04-23-00043-CR, 04-23-00044-CR, 04-23-00045-CR, 04-23-

00046-CR, 04-23-00047-CR, and 04-23-00051-CR, consolidated for purposes of briefing and 

argument, if any. The parties must file any motions and briefs as if the proceedings were one; 

however, all cause numbers must be included on the documents.

The court will dispose of the original proceedings with separate orders and opinions 

except to the extent the original proceedings involve the same defendant.

It is so ORDERED on January 23, 2023.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
#### WINTERS v. WINTERS.

No. 31886.

Sept. 16, 1947.

*184 P. 2d 796.*

*130O. A. Brewer, of Hugo, for plaintiff in error.

E. A. Blythe and Welch & Welch, both of Hugo, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against her in the trial court. On April 17, *1946, she tiled*her brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause may be reversed and remanded with directions. City of Tulsa v. Cockrell, 195 Okla. 518, 159 P. 2d 711.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment entered for the defendant in error and to grant plaintiff in error a new trial.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, WELCH, CORN, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0395

SAT Date: 3/14/2014

Print Date: 9/30/2014

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-14-0395

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

S = Disp.

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk->mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong
PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption of low molecular weight fractions 

 is expected to be poor all routes (pchem). Concern for lung toxicity from 

interference with the natural surfactant balance of the lungs.

 Test Data: (-) Salmonella with and without activation; (-) E. coli 

with and without activation; no skin sensitization in a human Repeated Insult Patch Test as a 

neat oil; no eye irritation in the in vitro EpiOcular assay

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.925

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.576

green algal 96-h EC50 0.636

fish _ chronic value 0.557

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.471

algal _ chronic 

value

0.183

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for 

SAR chemical class = 

 modified log Kow = 6.1 (P); ; pH7; 

effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; 

hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/ L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

18

SARs Nonionic Surfactants

SAR Class Nonionic Surfactants

Ecotox Category Nonionic Surfactants

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

January 8, 2019 Session

IN RE RAESHAD B.

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sumner County

No. 2017-AD-11 Louis W. Oliver, Chancellor

___________________________________

No. M2018-00238-COA-R3-PT

___________________________________

RICHARD H. DINKINS, J., concurring.

I concur in the result reached in this very difficult case. 

Our holding that the record does not clearly and convincingly establish the 

grounds for termination means that we do not reach the question of what is in Raeshad’s 

best interest. The dismissal of the termination proceeding means that Mother and 

Raeshad retain the parent-child relationship and does not compel his return to her 

custody. Neither does it necessarily lead to the lack of involvement by the Guardians in 

his life; it is clear that Raeshad and the Guardians, along with their other children, have 

formed familial bonds. 

 

The record is not clear as to the nature and status of the juvenile court proceeding, 

which was apparently initiated as an emergency petition for protective custody; we do not 

know if there will be further court involvement between the parties. As this appeal did 

not seek review of an order of the juvenile court, we are unable to remand the case to that 

court. It also appears from the record that neither Jonah’s Journey nor its successor 

agency is involved in this situation; the opinion notes that Mrs. B. stated “[i]t was up to 

the mother and the caregivers to work things out.”

As they go forth, I encourage the parties to consider Raeshad’s best interest and, as 

necessary, seek the guidance of the Department of Children’s Services, the juvenile court 

(to the extent it has resources available), or some other entity that is able to assist the 

parties. 

______________________________________

RICHARD H. DINKINS, JUDGE

05/20/2019
* Exhibits will be open as staffing 

allows. Check at Byrd Visitor 

Center (540-999-3500, ext.3283) 

for current information.

Note: Horses are not allowed in camp. A 

hitching post is provided at the intersection 

of the horse trail and Rapidan Fire Road.

Creel Cabin

Prime Minister's Cabin

(exhibits*)

The Brown House

(exhibits*)

Five Tents Trail

Leave No Trace Preservation through education: building awareness, appreciation, and most of all, respect for our public recreation places.

National Park Service Shenandoah National Park U.S. Department of the Interior

01/13

Park Emergency Number (800) 732-0911

Rapidan Camp via Mill Prong Trail - 4 miles 

round trip from Milam Gap Parking, moderate, steep 

at places, 3 stream crossings.

Rapidan Camp via Mill and Laurel Prongs, 

Appalachian Trail - 7.4-mile circuit, moderate (but long), 

along streams with cascades.

Note: Round trip hikes proceed to a destination and return 

by the same route. Circuit hikes begin and end 

at the same point without retracing steps.

Rapidan Camp Area

Road and Trail Map

Park Information recording: (540) 999-3500 

www.nps.gov/shen

*

* Horses are allowed only on yellow-blazed fire roads and trails.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 397 

To prohibit the Department of Health and Human Services from operating 

unlicensed temporary emergency shelters for unaccompanied alien children. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. MERKLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Department of Health and Human Services 

from operating unlicensed temporary emergency shelters 

for unaccompanied alien children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shut Down Child Pris5 on Camps Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINED TERM. 

7 In this Act, the term ‘‘temporary emergency shelter’’ 

8 means an unlicensed care provider facility that provides 

9 temporary emergency shelter and services for unaccomVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:20 Feb 16, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S397.IS S397

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 397 IS

1 panied alien children when licensed facilities are near or 

2 at capacity. 

3 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION AGAINST TEMPORARY EMERGENCY 

4 SHELTERS. 

5 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 

6 not maintain or operate (directly or through a contract) 

7 any temporary emergency shelter, including— 

8 (1) the temporary emergency shelter previously 

9 operational in Tornillo, Texas; and 

10 (2) the temporary emergency shelter in Home11 stead, Florida. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

DAVID ALLEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

/

Opinion filed April 3, 2017. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16

- 982

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County.

Andrew J. Decker, Judge.

David Allen, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2



      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


        I, Paul Bartlett, the chief financial officer of Critical Path, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of
title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,

        (i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period and
year ending December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), and filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

        (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                           /s/ Paul Bartlett

                                     ------------------------------------
                                     Paul Bartlett
                                       Executive Vice President and Chief
                                       Financial Officer

                                     March 28, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.