alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 27.967 Fuel tank installation. ( a ) Each fuel tank must be supported so that tank loads are not concentrated on unsupported tank surfaces. In addition— ( 1 ) There must be pads, if necessary, to prevent chafing between each tank and its supports;
( 2 ) The padding must be nonabsorbent or treated to prevent the absorption of fuel;
( 3 ) If flexible tank liners are used, they must be supported so that it is not necessary for them to withstand fluid loads; and
( 4 ) Each interior surface of tank compartments must be smooth and free of projections that could cause wear of the liner unless— ( i ) There are means for protection of the liner at those points; or
( ii ) The construction of the liner itself provides such protection.
( b ) Any spaces adjacent to tank surfaces must be adequately ventilated to avoid accumulation of fuel or fumes in those spaces due to minor leakage. If the tank is in a sealed compartment, ventilation may be limited to drain holes that prevent clogging and excessive pressure resulting from altitude changes. If flexible tank liners are installed, the venting arrangement for the spaces between the liner and its container must maintain the proper relationship to tank vent pressures for any expected flight condition.
( c ) The location of each tank must meet the requirements of § 27.1185 (a) and (c).
( d ) No rotorcraft skin immediately adjacent to a major air outlet from the engine compartment may act as the wall of the integral tank.
[Doc. No. 26352, 59 FR 50387, Oct. 3, 1994]
#### Edwin A. Beers *vs.*The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company.

Third Judicial District.

Argued June 1st

decided July 16th, 1915.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence, brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County *712and tried to the jury before *Webb, J.;*the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $5,500 which the court set aside as excessive upon the plaintiff’s refusal to remit the sum of $2,000, from which decision the plaintiff appealed.

*No error.*

*Henry E. Shannon*and *Edward J. Quinlan,*with whom was *John J. Walsh,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*William L.*Barnett,'for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff recovered a verdict for $5,500. The court, in response to a motion, ordered the verdict set aside and granted a new trial unless the plaintiff should within one week enter a *remittitur*as to $2,000 of the verdict, and consent that a judgment for $3,500 should be entered. The plaintiff filed a refusal to enter such a *remittitur,*and appealed to this court alleging error in setting aside the verdict.

The plaintiff was standing in a freight-car, when, by reason of another car being shunted against it by the defendant’s negligence, he was thrown or jumped to the ground and broke his heel bone. After suffering some time from his injury, pneumonia set in, and one of the contested questions between the parties was whether the pneumonia was caused by the defendant’s negligence. Considerable expert testimony was offered upon this question and was quite conflicting. A large part of the expense and suffering for which the plaintiff claimed to recover were caused by the pneumonia. The court’s action upon the motion shows that in its view the plaintiff was entitled to substantial damages, but that the verdict rendered was excessive.

We cannot, from the evidence before us, say that’ the presiding judge abused his discretion in so holding. The appearance and conduct of the witnesses and the *713plaintiff in such a case would have great weight. These may have been such as to satisfy the court that the jury improperly allowed some item of damage claimed by the plaintiff which the evidence did not warrant.

The plaintiff’s counsel have suggested that, should we be of opinion that the action of the court below was not unwarranted, we order that a judgment for the plaintiff for $3,500 be now entered. The plaintiff had, and rejected, an opportunity to accept a judgment for this amount. He cannot be allowed to speculate upon his chances, and now, without a new trial, recover a judgment for the amount which he rejected in the Superior Court.

There is no error.
§ 27.1027 Transmissions and gearboxes: General. ( a ) The lubrication system for components of the rotor drive system that require continuous lubrication must be sufficiently independent of the lubrication systems of the engine(s) to ensure lubrication during autorotation.
( b ) Pressure lubrication systems for transmissions and gearboxes must comply with the engine oil system requirements of §§ 27.1013 (except paragraph (c)), 27.1015, 27.1017, 27.1021, and 27.1337(d).
( c ) Each pressure lubrication system must have an oil strainer or filter through which all of the lubricant flows and must— ( 1 ) Be designed to remove from the lubricant any contaminant which may damage transmission and drive system components or impede the flow of lubricant to a hazardous degree;
( 2 ) Be equipped with a means to indicate collection of contaminants on the filter or strainer at or before opening of the bypass required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section; and
( 3 ) Be equipped with a bypass constructed and installed so that— ( i ) The lubricant will flow at the normal rate through the rest of the system with the strainer or filter completely blocked; and
( ii ) The release of collected contaminants is minimized by appropriate location of the bypass to ensure that collected contaminants are not in the bypass flowpath.
( d ) For each lubricant tank or sump outlet supplying lubrication to rotor drive systems and rotor drive system components, a screen must be provided to prevent entrance into the lubrication system of any object that might obstruct the flow of lubricant from the outlet to the filter required by paragraph (c) of this section. The requirements of paragraph (c) do not apply to screens installed at lubricant tank or sump outlets.
( e ) Splash-type lubrication systems for rotor drive system gearboxes must comply with §§ 27.1021 and 27.1337(d).
[Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34213, Sept. 2, 1988, as amended by Amdt. 27-37, 64 FR 45095, Aug. 18, 1999]
TIME 1425 HRS 

DATE 2/26/2015 

RECORD OF CONVERSATION 

NAME(S) OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONFERENCE AND LOCATION 

Ray Johnson, FAA Airmen Training and Certification Branch, AFS-81 0 

Ms. Paula Lawton, With rotor Aviation, Inc. 

SUBJECT 

Request for further information, With rotor Aviation, Inc. (With rotor) petition for exemption 

Docket FAA-2015-0123 

DIGEST 

On February 26, 2015, I contacted Ms. Lawton for information needed to support With rotor's 

request for exemption. Specifically, I requested the specific type and registration numbers of the 

aircraft that would be used under the requested relief, as well as general clarification questions 

pertaining to the request. 

Ms. Lawton responded with the requested information on February 27, 2015 (via email) and again 

on March 2, 2015 (via letter; attached to this record). 

CONCLUSION, ACTION TAKEN, OR REQUIRED 

The information provided by With rotor will be used by the FAA during the consideration of the 

petition for exemption.
§ 27.351 Yawing conditions. ( a ) Each rotorcraft must be designed for the loads resulting from the maneuvers specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section with— ( 1 ) Unbalanced aerodynamic moments about the center of gravity which the aircraft reacts to in a rational or conservative manner considering the principal masses furnishing the reacting inertia forces; and
( 2 ) Maximum main rotor speed.
( b ) To produce the load required in paragraph (a) of this section, in unaccelerated flight with zero yaw, at forward speeds from zero up to 0.6 VNE— ( 1 ) Displace the cockpit directional control suddenly to the maximum deflection limited by the control stops or by the maximum pilot force specified in § 27.397(a);
( 2 ) Attain a resulting sideslip angle or 90°, whichever is less; and
( 3 ) Return the directional control suddenly to neutral.
( c ) To produce the load required in paragraph (a) of this section, in unaccelerated flight with zero yaw, at forward speeds from 0.6 VNE up to VNE or VH, whichever is less— ( 1 ) Displace the cockpit directional control suddenly to the maximum deflection limited by the control stops or by the maximum pilot force specified in § 27.397(a);
( 2 ) Attain a resulting sideslip angle or 15°, whichever is less, at the lesser speed of VNE or VH;
( 3 ) Vary the sideslip angles of paragraphs (b)(2) and (c)(2) of this section directly with speed; and
( 4 ) Return the directional control suddenly to neutral.
[Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 7999, Mar. 6, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 27-34, 62 FR 46173, Aug. 29, 1997]
#### § 1250.100 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereafter referred to as “the Act”) to the end that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, hereinafter referred to as NASA.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Finance Docket No. 33835] 

                    Penn Jersey Rail Lines, Inc. (PJRL), a Class III rail carrier, has filed a notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire, by assignment from Consolidated Rail Corporation, and operate, as a common carrier railroad, line easements in Penn Warner Industrial Park, Falls Township, Bucks County, PA.[1]                                          The line easements are described as approximately a mile in length and beginning at a point located 250 feet +/−in a westerly direction along the centerline of the track from the Point of Switch at Railroad Station 0+00.                 

The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or after May 1, 2000. 

                    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void                     *ab initio.*                     Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke does not automatically stay the transaction.                 

An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 33835, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be served on Fritz R. Kahn, Esq., 1920 N Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036-1601. 

Board decisions and notices are available on our website at “WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.” 

Decided: April 27, 2000.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary. 

# Footnotes

1.                             In the verified notice of exemption, PJRL states that the line easements are identified as Easements A and B in a deed of easement from the Warner Realty Investment Company to Penn Central Transportation Company, dated December 13, 1973.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-11182 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

2

NW/ANE%

SY Sec. 17, T. 305., R 26 E.

© 900 1800 cpm

West
|
SWYSWY4
Sec. 5, T. 305., R. 26 E.
© 900cpm
w
wo
33
a8
we
ae
Nias
ROS
Ne
Sv
\
.
SS
N

s =N

s \
wt N
cig ‘
8s
as

°

&

9
MIDOLE MIOCENE
Hawthorn formation F

Lithologic symbols

Sand

Orgonie material

Iron cementation or
staining; hardpan’

Clay

Phosphate nodules

Calcareous clay

il

Limestone

No recovery, core lost

A mixture of symbols indicates
a mixed lithology

EXPLANATION

Other symbols

Lithologic correlation

Stratigraphic correlation

Limits of aluminum and
calcium phosphate zones

Alternating symbol icote two or
three of the above correlations
follow the same line

F

Section of core from which fossils
were identified

er
Sample number and interval sampled
from lot 2546

Surtoce?__200 €Pm

d

Trace of gamma-ray lag showing
intensity of radiation; cpm=
counts per minute

‘Scale,in feet
°

20

3

NWYANEY
Sec. 9, T. 305.,

26 E.

©8600 _1800 cpm

4
NEVSEY
Sec. 15, 7. 305.,R. 26E.

© 900 1800 cpm

5
WYSE
Sec. 13, T. 305.,R. 26E.

© 900 1800 cpm

6
SEYNWA

Sec, 18, T. 308. R. 27 E.

G00 _1800 epm

CROSS SECTION 13, LAND-PEBBLE PHOSPHATE DISTRICT, FLORIDA

us

SWYUSWA
Sec. 29, T. 30S., R. 27 E.’

2-960 cpm

BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 28

Elevation, in feet

160
East
Sec. 28, T. 30S., R. 27 E.
© 900 cpm
wy
S$
3 [140
Pale
28
we
ae
L120
<
2
2
Fa
ra
gs
as
e +100
5
a
+ 80
ogs
FB
aoe
Se 3
2
guBs
aes
See
25
MIDDLE MIOCENE [60
Howthorn formation
+ 40
L20

466352 0 59 (In pocket)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                       244
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,553
<PP&E>                                           4,975
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,689
<BONDS>                                            419
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,619
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,414
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    44
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    686
<INCOME-TAX>                                       274
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                412
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       412
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
### E m a ili ng : 2005 . b mp R a l ph D e S i ena to: C l e ve l and Ho ll aday 11 / 10 / 2011 04: 56

PM 2 atta c hments 2005 . b mp 2005 .t

xt 2005 met
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-045]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that USA Video Interactive, Corp., of 
Mystic, CT, has applied for an exclusive license to practice the 
invention disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,426,512 entitled ``Image Data 
Compression Having Minimum Perceptual Error (DCTUNE)'' and U.S. Patent 
No. 5,629,780 entitled ``Image-Adapted Visually Weighted Quantization 
Matrices For Digital Image Compression'' which is assigned to the 
United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to 
the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Ames Research 
Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by July 3, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Padilla, Patent Counsel, NASA 
Ames Research Center, M/S 202A-3, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, (650) 
604-5104.

    Dated: April 26, 2000.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-11132 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50006

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS DE LA CRUZ-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-01-CR-305-1-FB

--------------------

June 19, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Luis De La Cruz-Hernandez appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. De La

Cruz-Hernandez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the

aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased

sentence is an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)

that should have been alleged in his indictment. De La CruzHernandez maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which
No. 02-50006 

-2-

charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues

that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of

imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

De La Cruz-Hernandez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed

by Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court

must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court

itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Grant of Extension of Time PAGE 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0414 IN THE MATTER OF S.S., A Youth in Need of Care. **ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENS ION OF TIME**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s m oti on for extension of time, and good cause appearing therefore, Appellant, S.S., is granted an extension of time until December 31, 2021 to prepare, serve, and file the Opening Brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 12 2021

11/12/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0414
§ 27.1011 Engines: General. ( a ) Each engine must have an independent oil system that can supply it with an appropriate quantity of oil at a temperature not above that safe for continuous operation.
( b ) The usable oil capacity of each system may not be less than the product of the endurance of the rotorcraft under critical operating conditions and the maximum oil consumption of the engine under the same conditions, plus a suitable margin to ensure adequate circulation and cooling. Instead of a rational analysis of endurance and consumption, a usable oil capacity of one gallon for each 40 gallons of usable fuel may be used.
( c ) The oil cooling provisions for each engine must be able to maintain the oil inlet temperature to that engine at or below the maximum established value. This must be shown by flight tests.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34213, Sept. 2, 1988]
EXHIBIT 10 (iii) 24
                          ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION


                    EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH PAUL J. GANCI

      Reference is made to the employment agreement  ("Agreement")  between Paul
J.  Ganci and  Central  Hudson Gas & Electric  Corporation  ("Central  Hudson").
Central Hudson ("hereinafter  'Assignor') hereby assigns its Agreement with Paul
J. Ganci, pursuant to authorization of its Board of Directors by action taken on
January  28,  2000,  in the form  attached  hereto,  to CH  Energy  Group,  Inc.
("Assignee").

      Assignor and Assignee hereby agree as follows:

      Assignor  hereby  assigns all of its interest and  obligations  under said
Agreement to Assignee and Assignee,  pursuant to  authorization  of its Board of
Directors by action taken on February 4, 2000,  and pursuant to Section 11(c) of
said Agreement,  as successor  corporation to substantially  all of the business
and/or  assets of  Assignor,  hereby  expressly  assumes  and agrees to perform,
effective  December 15, 1999,  the  Agreement in the same manner and to the same
extent Assignor would be required to perform the Agreement if no such succession
had taken place.

      Assignee also expressly and unconditionally assumes and agrees to perform,
effective December 15, 1999,  Assignor's  obligations under Assignor's Change of
Control Severance Policy and Plan ("Policy"), in the same manner and to the same
extent  Assignor  would be  required  to perform  under the Policy as if no such
succession  had taken  place.  References  in said  Agreement  and the Policy to
Assignor shall hereinafter be deemed references to Assignee.

                    CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION


Dated:  As of December 15, 1999    By:   /s/  Carl E. Meyer
                                      ------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Carl E. Meyer
                                  Title: President and Chief Operating Officer



                        CH ENERGY GROUP, INC.


Dated:  As of December 15, 1999    By:   /s/  Paul J. Ganci
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Paul J. Ganci
                                   Title: Chairman of the Board, President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>