alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                      HOST MARRIOTT, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                       AND PREFERRED STOCK DISTRIBUTIONS
                      (in millions, except ratio amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  2000  1999  1998  1997  1996
                                                  ----  ----  ----  ----  ----
<S>                                               <C>   <C>   <C>   <C>   <C>
Income from operations before income taxes....... $105  $240  $174  $ 83  $ (8)
  Add (deduct):
  Fixed charges..................................  533   518   415   364   283
  Capitalized interest...........................   (8)   (7)   (4)   (1)   (3)
  Amortization of capitalized interest...........    6     6     6     5     7
  Net gains (losses) related to certain 50% or
   less owned affiliate..........................  (24)   (6)   (1)   (1)    1
  Minority interest in consolidated affiliates...   27    21    52    31     6
                                                  ----  ----  ----  ----  ----
  Adjusted earnings.............................. $639  $772  $642  $481  $286
                                                  ====  ====  ====  ====  ====
Fixed charges:
  Interest on indebtedness and amortization of
   deferred financing Costs...................... $466  $469  $335  $288  $237
  Dividends on convertible preferred securities
   of subsidiary trust...........................  --    --     37    37     3
  Distributions on preferred limited partner
   units.........................................   20     6   --    --    --
  Portion of rents representative of the interest
   factor........................................   47    43    43    39    33
  Debt service guarantee interest expense of
   unconsolidated affiliates.....................  --    --    --    --     10
                                                  ----  ----  ----  ----  ----
  Total fixed charges and preferred stock
   distributions................................. $533  $518  $415  $364  $283
                                                  ====  ====  ====  ====  ====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred
 stock distributions............................. 1.20  1.49  1.54  1.32  1.01
</TABLE>
MEETING SI GN- I N SHEET

Meeting: 5 pI:. .. Meeting Date: IZIJ7/11

- - - Name (please print)

-- ~--

_ .:::: Co::rn.pany E-Mail Phone

]

"To/J . t. 1lA$ "; (.. ~eM-roV rT/CC-t>/~ Al (~/t?_~A·Jov 1"''- - J6Ct - ortr(-. _ _._

rY\;ostt, r'Ylw1l1\'W SJI MIY\QfBI\Koeeltd\(.5~~(j M·"tlIj-53Co

'= . ve~'9" /"?£J __ L S .P.7" d<-,k f? £, ol ,rr. ~-.

_little, e IMU:y Wt.[/rFf7ep , f"I1#IJLryeCtJI-i-IT£oRDWW .CtJIV.,. 15m ·28'6 - 35;;2...

Le.sll<- {!.n:J1l 1::1.1 ifi..,. ePA o..r fI, J:.J.. ti (u!J<..~ef"' 11V ;;o~-51..t'l-3n-o· l(a\\',.Q.}\1t\.9.-- S\-ws lA. .__(; f:I-/ o fi!c.( '0 1 ~l-e.a MM-t. e"f·j.'!:' «.tid.. -sV. 'l-7l

N<Sd t \-~o 0; _ t:f.A/OfH / E:En >!c£lL <? \. oo" ('A"jc\ <2 ee.:.S 20 "bY- 8 '15=1-
#### § 14.01 Purpose of these rules.

The Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. 504 (the Act), provides for the award of attorney fees and other expenses to eligible individuals and entities who are parties to certain administrative proceedings (adversary adjudications) before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). An eligible party may receive an award when it prevails over the FAA, unless the agency's position in the proceeding was substantially justified or special circumstances make an award unjust. The rules in this part describe the parties eligible for awards and the proceedings that are covered. They also explain how to apply for awards, and the procedures and standards that the FAA Decisionmaker will use to make them. As used hereinafter, the term “agency” applies to the FAA.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00208

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

00208\00208_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00208\00208_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00208\00208_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00208\00208_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00208\Certification Statement_00208.pdf Plant certification statement

00208\Supporting Documentation\00208_Site Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00208\Supporting Documentation\Water Flow Schematic.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00208\00208_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00208\00208_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
exv10w5






Exhibit 10.5




TERMS OF LEAR CORPORATION KEY MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN (“KMIP”)

(as approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the

Southern District of New York on August 28, 2009)




	 	 	 
	Participants

	 	The KMIP provides for incentives for certain senior
executives, including Robert E. Rossiter — Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and President, Matthew J.
Simoncini — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Raymond E. Scott — Senior Vice President and
President, Global Electrical and Electronic Systems,
and Louis R. Salvatore — Senior Vice President and
President, Global Seating Systems.
	 
	 	 
	Performance measures
and weightings

	 	Awards under the KMIP may be earned based on
achievement of (a) certain Chapter 11 milestones
within an established timeframe (75% of total award
opportunity) (the “Milestone Awards”) and (b) certain
financial performance targets (25% of total award
opportunity) (the “Financial Performance Awards”).
	 
	 	 
	Award opportunity

	 	The total target opportunities for such senior
executives under the KMIP, as a percentage of base
salary, are as follows: Mr. Rossiter — 500%;
Mr. Simoncini — 270%; Mr. Scott — 270%; and
Mr. Salvatore — 270%.
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Under the Milestone Awards, 15% of the award
opportunity is earned if an order confirming the
joint plan of reorganization (the “Plan”) is obtained
within 270 days of the filing of the Chapter 11
petitions (April 3, 2010), and 60% of the award
opportunity is earned if the Effective Date occurs
within 300 days of the filing of the Chapter 11
petitions (May 3, 2010). If the Plan as filed with
the Court on August 14, 2009 is modified in a manner
that so materially affects the equities that any
Milestone Awards based upon the modified Plan would
be unreasonable or inappropriate, any such party may
move to rescind the Milestone Awards.
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Under the Financial Performance Awards, up to 25% of
the total award opportunity is earned upon
achievement of quarterly adjusted operating earnings
targets (6.25% per quarter) beginning with the
3rd quarter of 2009 and prorated for any
quarter in which the Effective Date occurs. Financial
Performance Awards may not be earned for any period
after the Effective Date. Payouts based on the
adjusted operating earnings targets can range from
50% of the target up to 140% of the target for the
particular quarter based on actual results.
	 
	 	 
	Payout timing

	 	Payment of any earned Milestone Awards and Financial
Performance Awards will occur upon the effective date
of a qualified plan of reorganization (the “Effective
Date”); provided, that the payment of any such
amounts to Mr. Rossiter will occur 50% upon the
Effective Date and 50% one year after the Effective
Date.
FOREIGN JUDGMENTS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

January Term, 1897.]

Day, Price and Norris, JJ.

(The judges of the Third Circuit sitting in the First Circuit.)

#### H. M. Dunlap v. Douthet et al.

Validity of a Foreign Judgment, Duly Attested.

A duly attested and certified transcript of the judgment of a common pleas court in Pennsylvania, jurisdiction having been proved, is competent evidence to establish the fact of such judgment.

Day, J.

The law of Pennsylvania, constituting and conferring jurisdiction on the court of common pleas of Allegheny county, Pennsylvania, having, without objection or exceptions, been proven, a duly attested and certified transcript of the record of a judgment of that court, is competent evidence to establish the fact of such judgment.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4270 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4270

 To amend the CARES Act to ensure that the temporary relief from CECL 
 standards does not terminate in the middle of a company's fiscal year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 2020

  Mr. Tillis introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the CARES Act to ensure that the temporary relief from CECL 
 standards does not terminate in the middle of a company's fiscal year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY RELIEF FROM CECL STANDARDS.

    Section 4014(b) of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136) is amended by 
striking ``ending on the earlier of'' and all that follows through the 
end of the subsection and inserting the following: ``ending on the 
first day of the fiscal year of such insured depository institution, 
bank holding company, or any affiliate that begins after the date on 
which the national emergency concerning the novel coronavirus disease 
(COVID-19) outbreak declared by the President on March 13, 2020, under 
the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) terminates.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 29.1551 Oil quantity indicator.

Each oil quantity indicator must be marked with enough increments to indicate readily and accurately the quantity of oil.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,087,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,158,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,279,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,948,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,951,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,663,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,666,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,948,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               604,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  351,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                205,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            194,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   194,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
STATE OF MAI NE 

D E PART M E N T O F E NVIRON M ENTAL PROTECTION 

PAUL R. LEPAGE 

GO' ERNOR 

August 18, 2015 

David Conroy, Chief 

Air Programs Branch 

U.S. EPA Region 1-NE 

5 Post Office Square 

Mail Code: OEP 05-2 

Boston MA 02109-3912 

Dear Mr. Conroy: 

PATRICIA W. AHO 

COMM ISSIONER 

On February 20, 2008, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved amendments 

to Maine's State Implementation Plan (SIP) in the form of Chapter 141 Conformity of General Federal 

Actions. This Chapter controlled how Federal Actions within the State of Maine would be evaluated with 

regards to the SIP. These amendments incorporated sections of the CFR by reference; those sections have 

since been repealed and further amendments to the CFR have made Chapter I 41 unnecessary and 

redundant. The Department therefore repealed Chapter 141 and requests that EPA remove Chapter 141 

from Maine's SIP. 

I have attached a copy of our MAP A-1 form as proof of adoptions and a copy of the public notice. The 

Department received no substantive comments during the comment period; as such there is no response to 

comments included in this submission. 

lfyou have any questions, please contact Tom Graham of my staff at (207) 287-7598. 

a:Marc Allen 

~~L Robert Cone, Director 

Bureau of Air Quality 

1- :''1 \TF l l<ll':;l· :;·1 \T <l~ 1116 II<H; \~ R<l •D . :;tTI'F (, 312r:'.'-f'<lR<l D I :!.>Sr:F:-\TILII.DIU ' F.~ \'\\ ', \'I' '.Rf-: 
Letter to David Conroy 

August 18, 2015 

Page 2 of 2 

Enclosure 

Cc: Patricia Aho, Conunissioner 

Anne Arnold (electronic copy) 

Donald Dahl (electronic copy)
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wells Real Estate Fund II (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III,
Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/S/    LEO F. WELLS, IIILeo F. Wells, III Chief Executive Officer August 12, 2002
#### Bankers Trust Co. v. Phoenix Fashions, Inc.

*Mattes & Mattes,*for plaintiff.

*William P. Farrell,*for defendant.

*621October 16, 1957.

Robinson, J.,

These are preliminary objections to a complaint in assumpsit.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is a New York banking corporation, that on or about October 22,1956, one of its depositors drew and delivered a check payable to defendant, that thereafter the said depositor issued a stop payment order to plaintiff, that through “accident and mistake the plaintiff paid the check contrary to the direction of the stop payment order”, that the depositor relying upon the stop payment order paid defendant “a second time”, that plaintiff thereby became liable to its depositor and that defendant has become unjustly enriched at plaintiff’s expense. The claim is stated as a quasi-contract based on defendant’s unjust enrichment.

The preliminary objections allege that the complaint is insufficient: (1) In that a copy of the stop payment order is not attached; (2) because the time, place and manner of the second payment are not averred; (3) that the nature of plaintiff’s obligation to its depositor is not alleged; and (4) that plaintiff has not pleaded a cause of action.

We are unanimous that the objections are without merit and that the complaint calls upon defendant to answer.

The pleading states a simple case of liability against defendant based upon unjust enrichment. The principles of unjust enrichment have become settled and embedded in our law. They apply in cases where, as here, a defendant has become enriched because of two payments, one of which is due to an accident and mistake of another. In such cases the law will provide redress for one suffiering because of the unjust enrichment of another. The gist of the action is unjust enrichment. This is here pleaded in a clear, concise and summary form as required by Pa. R. C. P. 1019. The *622facts as alleged are, of course, to be taken as true under the preliminary objections.

It follows that plaintiff is not required to set forth concise copies of the stop payment order, or the evidence in connection with the second payment, or how plaintiff became legally indebted to its depositor. These are not necessary to a statement of plaintiff’s claim. As the matters incident to both payments are well within the knowledge of defendant it remains only for it to answer the allegations that it has become unjustly enriched at plaintiff’s expense.

Now, October 16, 1957, the preliminary objections to the complaint are overruled. Defendant is allowed 10 days in which to make answer. Exception for defendant.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
I. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1). The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2). The  information  contained  in the  Report fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 26, 2005                          By: /s/Douglas I. Payne
                                              ------------------------
                                              Douglas I. Payne
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 8.1

Significant Subsidiaries

The following table sets forth our significant subsidiaries as
of February 29, 2012:



|                                                                                            |  |                              |  |                 |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------- | ----- | -
|Name of Company                                                                             |  | Jurisdiction ofEstablishment |  | PercentageOwned |      
|CIBSA                                                                                       |  | Mexico                       |  |                 | 100.0 | %
|Coca-Cola FEMSA(1)                                                                          |  | Mexico                       |  |                 | 50.0  | %
|Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V. (a limited liability company; formerly Propimex, S.A. de C.V.) |  | Mexico                       |  |                 | 50.0  | %
|Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V.                                        |  | Mexico                       |  |                 | 50.0  | %
|Coca-Cola FEMSA de Venezuela, S.A. (formerly Panamco Venezuela, S.A. de C.V.)               |  | Venezuela                    |  |                 | 50.0  | %
|Spal Industria Brasileira de Bebidas, S.A.                                                  |  | Brazil                       |  |                 | 48.9  | %
|FEMSA Comercio                                                                              |  | Mexico                       |  |                 | 100.0 | %
|CB Equity                                                                                   |  | United Kingdom               |  |                 | 100.0 | %



|(1) | Percentage of capital stock. FEMSA owns 63.0% of the capital stock with full voting rights.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

 

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofGB&T Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Hunt, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ Richard A. Hunt                       |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Richard A. Hunt, Chief Executive  Officer |

 

 

March 5, 2008

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to GB&T Bancshares, Inc.and will be retained by GB&T and furnished to the SEC or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24438 Filed:06/06/23 Entered:06/06/23 17:26:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24438 Filed:06/06/23 Entered:06/06/23 17:26:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24438 Filed:06/06/23 Entered:06/06/23 17:26:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24438 Filed:06/06/23 Entered:06/06/23 17:26:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24438 Filed:06/06/23 Entered:06/06/23 17:26:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24438 Filed:06/06/23 Entered:06/06/23 17:26:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 6