alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Paulette Ford, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, M/S E-07, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/639-8008. 

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         Notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: May 1, 2000.

Carolyn J. Russell, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 

[FR Doc. 00-11383 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### § 27.723 Shock absorption tests.

The landing inertia load factor and the reserve energy absorption capacity of the landing gear must be substantiated by the tests prescribed in §§ 27.725 and 27.727, respectively. These tests must be conducted on the complete rotorcraft or on units consisting of wheel, tire, and shock absorber in their proper relation.
§ 121.921 Training devices and simulators. ( a ) Each flight training device or airplane simulator that will be used in an AQP for one of the following purposes must be evaluated by the FAA for assignment of a flight training device or flight simulator qualification level: ( 1 ) Required evaluation of individual or crew proficiency.
( 2 ) Training to proficiency or training activities that determine if an individual or crew is ready for an evaluation of proficiency.
( 3 ) Activities used to meet recency of experience requirements.
( 4 ) Line Operational Simulations (LOS).
( b ) Approval of other training equipment. ( 1 ) Any training equipment that is intended to be used in an AQP for purposes other than those set forth in paragraph (a) of this section must be approved by the FAA for its intended use.
( 2 ) An applicant for approval of training equipment under this paragraph must identify the device by its nomenclature and describe its intended use.
( 3 ) Each training device approved for use in an AQP must be part of a continuing program to provide for its serviceability and fitness to perform its intended function as approved by the FAA.
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 3:35 PM

To: 'surveyor@midrivers.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Montana Land Surveys (MLS) [FAA-2014-0889] 

Dear Mr. Roger W. Meyer:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2014‐

0889).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

•             Describe the aircraft make(s) and model(s) for the proposed UAS operation.  The description(s) should include

the following: size, maximum weight (including payload), and  aircraft type (i.e. ‐ fixed‐wing,rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air).

•             List the maximum aircraft speed(s) proposed for this operation, please include the airspeed type.  

•             Provide the maximum flight time(s) for the proposed UAS operation.

•             Your petition references a pre‐flight inspection and/or briefing.  Describe the process used to determine if the

UAS is airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS.

•             Describe the process used to document UAS discrepancies and the corrective action taken in the aircraft

record.  Examples of processes include (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain its UAS and

ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the petitioner has elected to

maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and inspection recommendations.

•             Your petition references the material(s) listed below, however the material(s) were not submitted for the

record.  Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o             operator's manual

o             Flight Manual

o             Operating Handbook

o             eBee user manual  

o             Trimble user manual  

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to jake.troutman@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 02/17/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
2
### Public Hearing on NPRM **MDE Rule**

**May 8, 2012**
• Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to establish standards for accessible medical diagnostic equipment.

• Comment period closes on June 8, 2012

## Hearing Procedures • Registered speakers may speak for 5 minutes each • After all registered speakers have presented, there will be an open microphone session for others to testify • Notify staff at the registration desk if you want to testify and have not preregistered • Please turn off or silence your cell phone

## Hearing Procedures
• Transcriptwill be kept and will be entered into the docket • Written remarks or PowerPoint shows should be given to the staff at the registration desk • Refrainfrom reacting publicly to witness presentations or Board member statements
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3385 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 15:46:15 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3385 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 15:46:15 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32



                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Playboy  Enterprises,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Christie Hefner, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Linda G. Havard,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christie Hefner
-----------------------------------
Name:    Christie Hefner
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:    November 8, 2007


/s/ Linda Havard
-----------------------------------
Name:    Linda G. Havard
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    November 8, 2007


This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A  signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by ss.  906 has been
provided  to  Playboy  Enterprises,   Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Playboy
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-251-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,251,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    191,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,947,298
<PP&E>                                       4,141,227
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,721,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,833,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,297,227
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,669
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,979,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,833,662
<SALES>                                        118,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,180
<CGS>                                           75,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  479,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,872,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,203,115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,203,115)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,203,115)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
#### Strausky *et al. v.*Erhardt, Collector.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

November 17, 1892.)

1. Customs Duties—Act. or March 3,1883—Hollow Ware.

Blue and white kitchen utensils, consisting of pots, kettles, saucepans, coffeepots, and similar ware, made of sheet steel, and glazed or enameled, *held*not to be dutiable as “hollow ware, coated, glazed, or tinned, ” under Schedule C, par. 201, at 3 cents per pound, but dutiable at 45 per cent, *ad valorem,*as “manufacturers’ articles or wares * * * composed wholly or in part of iron, steel, etc., ” under Schedule C, par. 316, of the act of March 3, 1883.

2. Same.

“Hollow ware” means cast-iron ware, in the act of 1883.

At Law. Motion for a direction of a verdict. Granted.

Maurice Strausky & Co. imported into the port of New York, in January, February, and March, 1890, certain steel kitchen utensils, hollow in form, glazed or enameled, blue and white, which he put upon the market, in his trade circulars, as “Strausky’s Steel Ware.” The collector classified them under Schedule C of the act of March 3, 1883, as manufactures of steel, etc., (paragraph 216,) and assessed duties *809thereon at 45 per centum *ad valorem.*The importers protested and brought suit claiming the merchandise to be dutiable at 3 cents per pound as “hollow ware,” under the same schedule and act, (paragraph 201.) The testimony of wholesale dealers was to the effect that, in the trade, the term “hollow ware” was restricted to cast-iron utensils, and did not cover the articles in suit. At the close of the testimony, Asst. U. S. Atty. Henry C. Platt moved for a direction of a verdict for the defendant on the following grounds: (1) That congress had defined the tariff meaning of the term “hollow ware,” in the first act in which the words had been used, viz., the act of March 2, 1861, where it was associated (paragraph 44) solely with castings of iron; and in the act of June 30, 1864, (paragraph 352,) the same association was made of hollow ware with cast-iron articles exclusively. (2) That the evidence established the fact that the trade meaning of the term corresponded with the congressional definition. (3) That the rulings of the treasury department had always been in conformity with such interpretation of the term.

*W. Wickham Smith,*for plaintiffs.

*Edward Mitchell,*U. S. Atty., and *Henry C. Platt,*Asst. U. S. Atty., for defendant.

Lacombe, Circuit Judge,

*(orally.)*Upon examination of the prior acts, I am satisfied that congress was of the understanding that “hollow ware” meant vessels of this general kind, which we have here, made of cast iron. For the reason, therefore, that there seems to have been a congressional meaning given to the words “hollow ware,” and embodied in statutes before the passage of the act of 1883, I assume that congress intended to use the words with the same meaning in the later act that it did in the prior act. Verdict directed in favor of the defendant.
#### § 29.755 Hull buoyancy.

*Water-based and amphibian rotorcraft.* The hull and auxiliary floats, if used, must have enough watertight compartments so that, with any single compartment of the hull or auxiliary floats flooded, the buoyancy of the hull and auxiliary floats, and wheel tires if used, provides a margin of positive water stability great enough to minimize the probability of capsizing the rotorcraft for the worst combination of wave heights and surface winds for which approval is desired.

[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968, as amended by Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 8003, Mar. 6, 1990]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                             260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (444)
<INVENTORY>                                     34,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,885
<PP&E>                                          16,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,975)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 169,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,247
<BONDS>                                        108,725
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,361
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   169,964
<SALES>                                        120,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,351
<CGS>                                           59,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   274
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,666
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,418
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                248
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,804
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,052
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10995]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP98-54-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

April 28, 2000.
    On March 13 and 28, 2000, the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) 
sponsored two informal settlement conferences for the purpose of 
initiating settlement discussions potentially leading to a resolution 
of all the Kansas ad valorem proceedings. During the March 28 
conference, the participants agreed that settlement negotiations among 
all interested parties should be pursued separately for each pipeline 
involved with the Kansas ad valorem tax refund issues.
    The participants interested in the Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
docket also reached a consensus that the informal settlement conference 
agreed upon should be noticed by the Secretary of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) and that the Commission's settlement 
regulations apply to the informal settlement process. The participants 
also agreed that, as with the previous two settlement conferences, the 
Director of the Commission's Dispute Resolution Service and the KCC 
attend the conference and facilitate the settlement negotiations.
    The informal settlement conference will be held on May 23, 2000, at 
the offices of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, 1 Kansas City Place, 1200 Main 
Street, Kansas, Missouri. The conference will begin at 10:00 a.m. To 
insure that the facilities are adequately sized all parties that plan 
to attend the settlement conference are requested to contact John 
McNish at 785-271-3218 or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e288cc8f818c8b918aa2898181cc9196839687cc8991cc9791"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a50145759545349527a51595914494e5b4e5f145149144f49">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
Cynthia King at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d5e5654535a7d4e555f135e5250"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bdded6d4d3dafdced5df93ded2d0">[email protected]</span></a> by May 11, 2000.
    All interested parties in the above dockets are requested to attend 
the informal settlement conference. If a party has any questions 
respecting the conference, please call Richard Miles, the Director of 
the Dispute Resolution Service. His telephone number is 1 877 FERC ADR 
(337-2237) or 202-208-0702 and his e-mail address is 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcaeb5bfb4bdaeb8f2b1b5b0b9af9cbab9aebff2bab9b8f2a9af"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f4d565c575e4d5b115256535a4c7f595a4d5c11595a5b114a4c">[email protected]</span></a>.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10995 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
rev. Dec. 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

You must accompany your complaint with this Category Sheet, and the Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44).

1. Title (caption) of the Case (provide only the names of the first party on each side):

2. Indicate the category to which this case belongs:

3. Indicate the title and number of related cases (if any).

4. Has a prior action between the same parties and based on the same claim ever been filed before this Court?

5. Is this case required to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2284?

6. Does this case question the constitutionality of a state statute? (See, Fed.R.Civ. P. 24)

CATEGORY SHEET

 Ordinary Civil Case

 Social Security

 Banking

 Injunction

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Date Submitted:

Email Address:

USDC-PR Bar Number:

Attorney Name (Last, First, MI):

Plaintiff:

Defendant:

Print Form

9/6/2018

Reset Form

jcasillas@cstlawpr.com

218312

Casillas Ayala, Juan, J. 

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the Debtors (Other Than COFINA)

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3880-1 Filed:09/06/18 Entered:09/06/18 20:55:50 Desc:

Category Sheet Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10(a)  


[SUTHERLAND
ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP LETTERHEAD] 


April 22,
2003 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 280 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 


Directors: 


        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of post-effective amendment number
13 to the registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-70984) filed by Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 



	 	 	Sincerely,
	

 	
 	

SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ David S. Goldstein
 David S. Goldstein
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,331]

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers at Vesuvius Premier Refractories, Washington, Pennsylvania. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-37,331; Vesuvius Premier Refractories. Washington, Pennsylvania (April 26, 2000)

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 27th day of April, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-11116  Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M