alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 135.209 VFR: Fuel supply. ( a ) No person may begin a flight operation in an airplane under VFR unless, considering wind and forecast weather conditions, it has enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising fuel consumption— ( 1 ) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or
( 2 ) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.
( b ) No person may begin a flight operation in a helicopter under VFR unless, considering wind and forecast weather conditions, it has enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising fuel consumption, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Element 21 Golf Company (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Philip Clark,
Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:
 
 (1)
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Date:
      November 13, 2009
              
              By:  /s/
      Philip Clark, CA, CPA, CFAChief
      Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Eric S. Yonenson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of Critical Home Care, Inc. (the
"Company"),  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (a)  the Periodic  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
               ended June 30, 2003,  which this  certification  accompanies (the
               "Periodic  Report"),  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
               section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (b)  the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
               in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


          Dated: August 19, 2003
                                                         /s/ Eric S. Yonenson
                                                         -------------------
                                                         Eric S. Yonenson
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

"A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Critical  Home Care,  Inc.,  and will be retained by Critical  Home
Care, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request."
§ 29.1199 Extinguishing agent containers. ( a ) Each extinguishing agent container must have a pressure relief to prevent bursting of the container by excessive internal pressures.
( b ) The discharge end of each discharge line from a pressure relief connection must be located so that discharge of the fire extinguishing agent would not damage the rotorcraft. The line must also be located or protected to prevent clogging caused by ice or other foreign matter.
( c ) There must be a means for each fire extinguishing agent container to indicate that the container has discharged or that the charging pressure is below the established minimum necessary for proper functioning.
( d ) The temperature of each container must be maintained, under intended operating conditions, to prevent the pressure in the container from— ( 1 ) Falling below that necessary to provide an adequate rate of discharge; or
( 2 ) Rising high enough to cause premature discharge.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, 72 Stat. 759, 775, 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423; sec. 6(c), 49 U.S.C. 1655 (c))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-13, 42 FR 15047, Mar. 17, 1977]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 26, 2017

No. 04-15-00630-CR

Troy Stanley STAIR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-0709-CR-B

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

State’s motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. The State’s brief is due 

on February 20, 2017. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of January, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 25.493 Braked roll conditions. ( a ) An airplane with a tail wheel is assumed to be in the level attitude with the load on the main wheels, in accordance with figure 6 of appendix A. The limit vertical load factor is 1.2 at the design landing weight and 1.0 at the design ramp weight. A drag reaction equal to the vertical reaction multiplied by a coefficient of friction of 0.8, must be combined with the vertical ground reaction and applied at the ground contact point.
( b ) For an airplane with a nose wheel the limit vertical load factor is 1.2 at the design landing weight, and 1.0 at the design ramp weight. A drag reaction equal to the vertical reaction, multiplied by a coefficient of friction of 0.8, must be combined with the vertical reaction and applied at the ground contact point of each wheel with brakes. The following two attitudes, in accordance with figure 6 of appendix A, must be considered: ( 1 ) The level attitude with the wheels contacting the ground and the loads distributed between the main and nose gear. Zero pitching acceleration is assumed.
( 2 ) The level attitude with only the main gear contacting the ground and with the pitching moment resisted by angular acceleration.
( c ) A drag reaction lower than that prescribed in this section may be used if it is substantiated that an effective drag force of 0.8 times the vertical reaction cannot be attained under any likely loading condition.
( d ) An airplane equipped with a nose gear must be designed to withstand the loads arising from the dynamic pitching motion of the airplane due to sudden application of maximum braking force. The airplane is considered to be at design takeoff weight with the nose and main gears in contact with the ground, and with a steady-state vertical load factor of 1.0. The steady-state nose gear reaction must be combined with the maximum incremental nose gear vertical reaction caused by the sudden application of maximum braking force as described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( e ) In the absence of a more rational analysis, the nose gear vertical reaction prescribed in paragraph (d) of this section must be calculated according to the following formula:
Where: VN = Nose gear vertical reaction. WT = Design takeoff weight. A = Horizontal distance between the c.g. of the airplane and the nose wheel. B = Horizontal distance between the c.g. of the airplane and the line joining the centers of the main wheels. E = Vertical height of the c.g. of the airplane above the ground in the 1.0 g static condition. μ = Coefficient of friction of 0.80. f = Dynamic response factor; 2.0 is to be used unless a lower factor is substantiated. In the absence of other information, the dynamic response factor f may be defined by the equation:
Where: ξ is the effective critical damping ratio of the rigid body pitching mode about the main landing gear effective ground contact point.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5673, Apr. 8, 1970; Amdt. 25-97, 63 FR 29072, May 27, 1998]
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(a)

                  [SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP LETTERHEAD]

                   CONSENT OF SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

                                 April 21, 2003

Board of Directors
Nationwide Life and Annuity Company of America
300 Continental Drive
Newark, DE 19713

Directors:

     We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Statement of Additional Information for certain flexible premium
deferred variable annuity contracts filed as part of the post-effective
amendment to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 for Nationwide Provident VA
Separate Account A (File No. 33-65512). In giving this consent, we do not admit
that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7
of the Securities Act of 1933.

                                       Very Truly Yours,

                                       SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP



                                       By: /s/ Stephen E. Roth
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Stephen E. Roth
§ 29.53 Takeoff: Category A. The takeoff performance must be determined and scheduled so that, if one engine fails at any time after the start of takeoff, the rotorcraft can— ( a ) Return to, and stop safely on, the takeoff area; or
( b ) Continue the takeoff and climbout, and attain a configuration and airspeed allowing compliance with § 29.67(a)(2).
[Doc. No. 24802, 61 FR 21899, May 10, 1996; 61 FR 33963, July 1, 1996]
EXHIBIT 31.1

                             CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO SECTION 302
                               OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


I, Anthony C. Dike, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form  10-QSB/A of Meridian Holdings,
Inc.;

2. Based  on  my  knowledge,  this quarterly report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a  material fact or omit  to  state  a material fact  necessary  to
make  the  statements  made,  in  light of  the  circumstances  under which such
statements were made, not  misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3. Based   on   my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as  defined  in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be  designed  under our  supervision,  to  ensure  to
ensure that  material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its
consolidated  subsidiaries,  is   made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness  of the  registrant's disclosure controls  and
procedures  and  presented  in  this  quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

   c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the  case of an
annual report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to
materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of   registrant's  board  of
directors  (or  persons  performing  the equivalent functions):

   a) all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or  operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and

   b) any  fraud,  whether   or  not   material,  that  involves  management  or
other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date:     February 25, 2005

By:/s/ Anthony C. Dike
Anthony C. Dike
Chairman and CEO (Principal Executive Officer)
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.130 Applications for waiver of tariff regulations.

Applications for waiver or modification of any of the requirements of this part 221 or for modification of chapter 415 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII with respect to the filing and posting of tariffs shall be made by the issuing carrier or issuing agent.
### -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 38 39 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/19 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.48 N 77.37 WMeters AGL
# Official Journal C 185/4 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 185 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 584 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 185

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 584 June 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 185/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Fifth supplement to the 33rd complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 185/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Fifth supplement to the 33rd complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 256.4 Prohibition on undisclosed display bias. Each air carrier, foreign air carrier, and ticket agent that operates an EAIS must comply with the requirements of this section. ( a ) Each EAIS that uses any factor, not based on user selection or corporate contract travel arrangement, directly or indirectly relating to carrier identity in ordering the information contained in an integrated display must clearly disclose as provided for in § 256.5 that the identity of the carrier is a factor in the order in which information is displayed.
( b ) An EAIS's integrated display must not give any carrier's flights a system-imposed preference over any other carrier's flights in that market based on carrier identity unless the preference is prominently disclosed as provided for in § 256.5.
( c ) Each EAIS must display information in an objective manner based on search criteria selected by the user (*e.g.,* lowest fare, lowest total cost, date and time of travel, class of service, stopovers, total elapsed time or duration of travel, number of stops, limitations on carriers to be used, particular airport(s), number of passengers, etc.) When providing information in response to a search by a user of the EAIS, the EAIS must order the information provided so that the flight options that best satisfy the parameters of the user-selected search criteria are displayed conspicuously and no less prominently (*e.g.,* in the same or larger font size and the same or more noticeable font color) than any other flight option displayed. Flight options may be presented in sequence, matrix, or other formats, but the flight options that best satisfy the parameters of the user-selected search criteria must be ranked in lists above other flight options, or identified more prominently than other flight options in a matrix or other format. This does not preclude systems from setting default display parameters that are not deceptive or offering users the option to choose a variety of display methods within those parameters.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense (DoD) announces a meeting of the Defense Partnership Council. Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This meeting is open to the public. The agenda will include a partnership presentation by the U.S. Army Operations Support Command (Provisional), NAGE Local R7-68 and AFGE Local 15, and other related Partnership topics.

# DATES:

The meeting is to be held May 23, 2000, in room 1E801, Conference Room 7, the Pentagon, from 1 p.m. until 3 p.m. Comments should be received by May 16, 2000, in order to be considered at the May 23 meeting.

# ADDRESSES:

We invite interested persons and organizations to submit written comments or recommendations. Mail or deliver your comments or recommendations to Mr. Ben James at the address shown below. Seating is limited and available on a first-come, first-serve basis. Individuals wishing to attend who do not possess an appropriate Pentagon building pass should call the below listed telephone number to obtain instructions for entry into the Pentagon. Handicapped individuals wishing to attend should also call the below listed telephone number to obtain appropriate accommodations.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Ben James, Chief, Labor Relations Branch, Field Advisory Services Division, Defense Civilian Personnel Management Service, 1400 Key Blvd, Suite B-200, Arlington, VA 22209-5144, (703) 696-6301, ext. 730.

Dated: April 25, 2000.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-11194 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 88 (Friday, May 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6588-3]


Acid Rain Program; Notice of the Filing of Petition for 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of the filing of petition for administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to announce the filing, with 
EPA's Environmental Appeals Board (EAB), of a petition for review by 
UtiliCorp United, Inc. (UCU) of a decision issued by EPA's Office of 
Air and Radiation, Clean Air Markets Division. This decision and 
petition for review concern a request submitted by UCU for approval of 
methods for apportionment of the nitrogen oxide (NO<INF>X</INF>) 
emissions from a common stack at UCU's Sibley, Missouri facility.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dwight C. Alpern, Attorney-Advisor, 
Clean Air Markets Division (6204J), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, 
DC 20460 at (202) 564-9151.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 5, 2000, UCU filed, with the EAB, a 
petition for review (Appeal No. CAA-004) of a decision by EPA's Office 
of Air and Radiation, Clean Air Markets Division, dated March 6, 2000, 
disapproving UCU's petition for approval of methods for apportionment 
of the NO<INF>X</INF> emissions from a common stack at UCU's facility 
located at Sibley, Missouri. The appeal raises issues regarding the 
requirements of 40 CFR 75.17(a)(2)(iii). The appeals was filed under 40 
CFR part 78 of the Acid Rain regulations and requested an evidentiary 
hearing. Motions for leave to intervene in Appeal No. CAA-004 under 40 
CFR 78.11 must be filed by May 22, 2000 with the EAB.

    Dated: May 1, 2000.
Brian J. McLean,
Director, Clean Air Markets Division.
[FR Doc. 00-11281 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P