alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 25.1439 Protective breathing equipment. ( a ) Fixed (stationary, or built in) protective breathing equipment must be installed for the use of the flightcrew, and at least one portable protective breathing equipment shall be located at or near the flight deck for use by a flight crewmember. In addition, portable protective breathing equipment must be installed for the use of appropriate crewmembers for fighting fires in compartments accessible in flight other than the flight deck. This includes isolated compartments and upper and lower lobe galleys, in which crewmember occupancy is permitted during flight. Equipment must be installed for the maximum number of crewmembers expected to be in the area during any operation.
( b ) For protective breathing equipment required by paragraph (a) of this section or by the applicable Operating Regulations: ( 1 ) The equipment must be designed to protect the appropriate crewmember from smoke, carbon dioxide, and other harmful gases while on flight deck duty or while combating fires.
( 2 ) The equipment must include— ( i ) Masks covering the eyes, nose and mouth, or
( ii ) Masks covering the nose and mouth, plus accessory equipment to cover the eyes.
( 3 ) Equipment, including portable equipment, must allow communication with other crewmembers while in use. Equipment available at flightcrew assigned duty stations must also enable the flightcrew to use radio equipment.
( 4 ) The part of the equipment protecting the eyes shall not cause any appreciable adverse effect on vision and must allow corrective glasses to be worn.
( 5 ) The equipment must supply protective oxygen of 15 minutes duration per crewmember at a pressure altitude of 8,000 feet with a respiratory minute volume of 30 liters per minute BTPD. The equipment and system must be designed to prevent any inward leakage to the inside of the device and prevent any outward leakage causing significant increase in the oxygen content of the local ambient atmosphere. If a demand oxygen system is used, a supply of 300 liters of free oxygen at 70 °F. and 760 mm. Hg. pressure is considered to be of 15-minute duration at the prescribed altitude and minute volume. If a continuous flow open circuit protective breathing system is used, a flow rate of 60 liters per minute at 8,000 feet (45 liters per minute at sea level) and a supply of 600 liters of free oxygen at 70 °F. and 760 mm. Hg. pressure is considered to be of 15-minute duration at the prescribed altitude and minute volume. Continuous flow systems must not increase the ambient oxygen content of the local atmosphere above that of demand systems. BTPD refers to body temperature conditions (that is, 37 °C., at ambient pressure, dry).
( 6 ) The equipment must meet the requirements of § 25.1441.
[Doc. No. FAA-2002-13859, 69 FR 40528, July 2, 2004]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as a representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as a representative of

PUERTO RICO HIGHWAYS AND 

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY,

Debtor. 

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3567-LTS

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL

Kindly withdraw the appearance of Jennifer P. Knox, Esquire of the law firm of Reed Smith LLP 

in the above-captioned proceeding as counsel on behalf of Siemens Transportation Partnership Puerto 

Rico, S.E. Claudia Springer and Andrew Soven of Reed Smith LLP and Albéniz Couret Fuentes and José 

Javier Santos Mimoso of Sepulvado, Maldonado & Couret will remain as counsel of record for Siemens 

Transportation Partnership Puerto Rico, S.E.

 

1

The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number listed as a bankruptcy case 

number due to software limitations and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); and (iv) Employees 

Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2417 Filed:02/06/18 Entered:02/06/18 15:14:29 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Dated: February 6, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

SEPULVADO, MALDONADO & COURET

By: s/Albéniz Couret Fuentes By: s/Jennifer P. Knox

Albéniz Couret Fuentes Jennifer P. Knox (Pro Hac Vice)

USDC-PR Bar No. 222207

s/José Javier Santos Mimoso

José Javier Santos Mimoso

USDC-PR Bar No. 208207

304 Ponce de León - Suite 990

San Juan, PR 00918

Telephone: 787-765-5656

Facsimile: 787-294-0073

Email: acouret@smlawpr.com

 jsantos@smlawpr.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2417 Filed:02/06/18 Entered:02/06/18 15:14:29 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### MORRIS v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 10, 1915.)

Appeal from Randolph Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. J. J. Curtis.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and W. H. Mitci-iell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Ti-iomas, J.

Bill of exceptions stricken on the authority of *Harper v. State, infra,*69 South. 302. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                          CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO SECTION 302
                          OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

I, Anthony C. Dike, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on  Form  10-QSB/A of Meridian Holdings,
Inc.;

2. Based  on  my  knowledge,  this quarterly report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a  material fact or omit  to  state  a material fact  necessary  to
make  the  statements  made,  in  light of  the  circumstances  under which such
statements were made, not  misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3. Based   on   my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as  defined  in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be  designed  under our  supervision,  to  ensure  to
ensure that  material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its
consolidated  subsidiaries,  is   made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness  of the  registrant's disclosure controls  and
procedures  and  presented  in  this  quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

   c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the  case of an
annual report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to
materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of   registrant's  board  of
directors  (or  persons  performing  the equivalent functions):

   a) all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or  operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and

   b) any  fraud,  whether   or  not   material,  that  involves  management  or
other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date:     August 20, 2005

By: /s/ Anthony C. Dike
Anthony C. Dike
Chairman and CEO (Principal Executive Officer)
Charge 8: Lab studies of efficacy of indoor fogger products

C Design: B Experimental unit: one cage (PVC pipe) with 10 bugs per cage B Factors: 2 trts (treated, untreated control); 5 strains of bed bugs; 3 height locations on wall; 4 walls B Block: one run in a Peet-Grady chamber B Number of blocks: 5 B Balanced incomplete block design Bed bug strain Run of chamber AB C DE 1 north east south west 2 east south west north 3 south west north east 4 west north east south 5 north east south west Table entry is wall location in the chamber. All 6 cages on a wall contain the same bed bug strain.

C Advantages of the design: B Variation in delivery of product from run to run, variation of product within the chamber, and other environment changes are accounted for (confounded with) by blocks (runs of Peet-Grady chamber) and will not affect strain or height location on wall B Requires only 12 cages per strain per run (6 treatment, 6 control) to get 4 replications of each strain– product–wall height combination (48 total per strain)

C Analysis: Use combined inter and intra-block analysis.
Exhibit A

USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 1 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 2 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 3 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 4 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 5 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 6 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 7 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 8 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 9 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 10 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 11 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 12 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 13 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 14 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 15 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 16 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 17 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 18 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 19 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 20 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 21 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 22 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 23 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 24 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 25 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 26 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 27 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 28 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 29 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 30 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 31 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 32 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 33 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 34 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 35 of 36
USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 36 of 36
### SERVED: APRIL 23, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC INTHE MATTER OF KEYSTONE LABORATORIES FAADOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0203 

### NOTICE OFASSIGNMENTOFPROCEEDING ?: 

### 3c1

This proceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2009CE700105) has been assigned to AdministrativeLawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, theFAAHearingDocket, and the'other persons onthe attached Service List. Attachment - ServiceList**.~**...........SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 Adam D. Otto, Respondent's Counsel

Otto Law Office P.O. Box 1356 303 South Second Avenue West Newton, IA 50208 TEL: 641-792•7000 FAX: 641-792-7001 ONE COPY Gayle E. Townsend, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel

Central Region, ACE7 Federal Aviation Administration

Room 506, DOT Building 901 Locust Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 TEL: 816-329-3766 FAX: 816-329-3771 "'

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant · FAX: 202-366-7536

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0203 (Civil Penalty Action) 1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. -2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [NAFTA-03669]

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Mineral Ridge Resources, Inc., Silver Peak, Nevada. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. 

NAFTA—03669; Mineral Ridge Resources, Inc. Silver Peak, Nevada (April 26, 2000)

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 27th day of April, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-11113 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B)
        OF
        SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)
 
 Pursuant
        to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
        of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
        undersigned officers of Unit Corporation a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
        does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
 
 The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form
        10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
        the
        Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and
        results of operations of the Company as of March 31, 2007 and December 31,
        2006
        and for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
 
 
 Dated:
        May 3, 2007
 
 By: /s/
        Larry D. Pinkston
 Larry
        D.
        Pinkston
 Chief
        Executive Officer and
 Director
 
 
 Dated:
        May 3, 2007
 
 By: /s/
        David T. Merrill
 David
        T.
        Merrill
 Chief
        Financial Officer and
 Treasurer
 
 
 The
        foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906
        of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
        63
        of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
        10-Q
        or as a separate disclosure document.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 has been provided to Unit Corporation and will be retained by
        Unit
        Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
        staff
        on request.
§ 27.1143 Engine controls. ( a ) There must be a separate power control for each engine.
( b ) Power controls must be grouped and arranged to allow— ( 1 ) Separate control of each engine; and
( 2 ) Simultaneous control of all engines.
( c ) Each power control must provide a positive and immediately responsive means of controlling its engine.
( d ) If a power control incorporates a fuel shutoff feature, the control must have a means to prevent the inadvertent movement of the control into the shutoff position. The means must— ( 1 ) Have a positive lock or stop at the idle position; and
( 2 ) Require a separate and distinct operation to place the control in the shutoff position.
( e ) For rotorcraft to be certificated for a 30-second OEI power rating, a means must be provided to automatically activate and control the 30-second OEI power and prevent any engine from exceeding the installed engine limits associated with the 30-second OEI power rating approved for the rotorcraft.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-11, 41 FR 55470, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34214, Sept. 2, 1988; Amdt. 27-29, 59 FR 47767, Sept. 16, 1994]
§ 1245.303 Criteria. The following categories of inventions will be considered for the filing of patent applications by NASA in countries other than the United States: ( a ) Inventions which may be utilized abroad in governmental programs of the United States.
( b ) Inventions which may be exploited abroad in the public interest by license to U.S. nationals or others.
( c ) Inventions which may be utilized in applications type satellites, such as communications and meteorological satellites.
( d ) Inventions considered to be basic discoveries or of major significance in an art.
( e ) Inventions in fields which directly concern the public health or public welfare.
# ----------------------~ Thomas, Shabu 

# (osn from: Sent: To: Thomas, Shabu (OSD Wednesday, April 22, 2015 4:32 PM rmacpherson@Jonesday.com Subject: Request for additional Information - Docket DOT-OST-2014-0192 - Menagerie Enterprises, Inc. 

### Dear Ms. MacPherson: Review of information submitted in support of Menagerie Enterprises' request to conduct scheduled passenger air transportation as a commuter airline, identified that the following individuals have changes in their positions with the company: Mr. Raymond F. (Trey) Sawtelle III Mr. Shaun Braley Please provide an updated resume indicatingthe new position held and a briefdescription ofthe responsibilities handled. You may upload your response via web at www.regulations.gov, or may mail your response to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building, Ground Floor, (M-30, Room W12-140), 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., West Building, Ground Floor, Washington, D.C. 20590. Thank you

Shabu Thomas Department ofTransportation

- OST 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Office ofAviation and International Affairs X-56 202.366.9721

1 

## -

# .. '·· 

### -.' LJ

-..... ' I .. I --**--,:::--o:·~·**

## :~~·~::;2 :.:_!= .. ll

### ::_.-~;::_;~ ·-.:--:.·-.-.... ; ...: ·:.Jt :-- -.-=:-... •
Certification by Chief Financial Officer
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher G. Marshall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/Christopher G. Marshall
 Christopher G. Marshall
 Chief Financial Officer
 August 15, 2011
 
 This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.