alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 89411) pertaining to the Multex.com, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan, the
Market Guide Inc. 1995 Key Employee Incentive Plan and the 1995 Independent
Director's Stock incentive Plan Special Option Grants to Messrs. Byramji and
Case of our report dated February 4, 2000, except for the seventh paragraph of
Note 17, as to which the date is March 21, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Multex.com, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                             /S/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 2000
Attachment 007 – SPECTRA – TS11FH01

1 of 10 pages

SANITIZED
Attachment 007 – SPECTRA – TS11FH01

2 of 10 pages

SANITIZED
Attachment 007 – SPECTRA – TS11FH01

3 of 10 pages

SANITIZED
Attachment 007 – SPECTRA – TS11FH01

4 of 10 pages

SANITIZED
Attachment 007 – SPECTRA – TS11FH01

5 of 10 pages

SANITIZED
Attachment 007 – SPECTRA – TS11FH01

6 of 10 pages

SANITIZED
Attachment 007 – SPECTRA – TS11FH01

7 of 10 pages

SANITIZED
Attachment 007 – SPECTRA – TS11FH01

8 of 10 pages

SANITIZED
Attachment 007 – SPECTRA – TS11FH01

9 of 10 pages

SANITIZED
Attachment 007 – SPECTRA – TS11FH01

10 of 10 pages

SANITIZED
§ 25.1123 Exhaust piping. For powerplant and auxiliary power unit installations, the following apply: ( a ) Exhaust piping must be heat and corrosion resistant, and must have provisions to prevent failure due to expansion by operating temperatures.
( b ) Piping must be supported to withstand any vibration and inertia loads to which it would be subjected in operation; and
( c ) Piping connected to components between which relative motion could exist must have means for flexibility.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-40, 42 FR 15044, Mar. 17, 1977]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

Morning: 

Set: 9:30 AM (AST)

Started: 9:40 AM (AST)

Ended: 12:39 PM (AST)

Afternoon Session:

Set: 1:30 PM (AST)

Started: 1:40 PM (AST)

Ended: 5:22 PM (AST)

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN DATE: February 28, 2023

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE JUDITH G. DEIN

COURTROOM DEPUTY: Carmen Tacoronte

COURT REPORTER: Amy Walker (SDNY)

In re: The Financial Oversight & Management 

Board for Puerto Rico

as representative of

3:17-BK-3283 (LTS)

PROMESA

Title III

(Jointly Administered)

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al.,

Debtors,

In re: The Financial Oversight & Management 

Board for Puerto Rico

as representative of

3:17-BK-4780 (LTS)

PROMESA

Title III

(Jointly Administered)

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority,

Debtor.

Disclosure Statement Hearing held.

1

1 Agenda filed at Docket Entry No. 23640 in 3:17-BK-3283 (LTS).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23652 Filed:02/28/23 Entered:03/01/23 09:36:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
3:17-BK-3283 (LTS) / 3:17-BK-4780 (LTS)

Disclosure Statement Hearing – February 28, 2023

Page 2 of 3

I. CONTESTED MATTERS

1. Disclosure Statement Motion. [Case No. 17-3283, ECF No. 23099; Case No. 17-4780, 

ECF No. 3113]

a. Arguments re: Disclosure Statement

i. Supporting Parties

1. FOMB

2. Fuel Line Lenders

3. National

ii. Government

1. AAFAF

iii. Objecting Parties

1. Ad Hoc Group of PREPA Bondholders

2. Ahimsa

3. Assured

4. Bond Trustee

5. Ad Hoc Committee of National Claim Assignees

6. Syncora

7. Unsecured Creditors Committee

8. UTIER

9. SREAEE

10. PV Properties

11. PR House/Senate

12. Manuel Gonzalez Joy (through counsel)

iv. FOMB to submit an amended order and further amended disclosure 

statement.

b. Arguments Re: Solicitation Procedures

i. Supporting parties

1. FOMB

2. National

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23652 Filed:02/28/23 Entered:03/01/23 09:36:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
3:17-BK-3283 (LTS) / 3:17-BK-4780 (LTS)

Disclosure Statement Hearing – February 28, 2023

Page 3 of 3

ii. Objecting parties

1. Ad Hoc Group of PREPA Bondholders

2. Assured

3. Bond Trustee

4. Unsecured Creditors Committee

iii. FOMB to revise the proposed order.

c. Order approving the proposed disclosure statement and related procedures to be 

entered. 

2. Confirmation Procedures Motion. [Case No. 17-3283, ECF No. 23100; Case No. 17-

4780, ECF No. 3114]

a. Arguments heard:

i. Supporting parties

1. FOMB

ii. Objecting parties

1. Ad Hoc Group of PREPA Bondholders

2. Assured

3. Unsecured Creditors Committee

b. Motion granted with modifications to the proposed schedule. 

c. Order to be issued. 

NEXT SCHEDULED HEARING: 

Omnibus Hearing set for March 15, 2023, at 9:30 AM (AST) before Judge Laura Taylor 

Swain. 

s/Carmen Tacoronte

Carmen Tacoronte

PROMESA Case Administrator

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23652 Filed:02/28/23 Entered:03/01/23 09:36:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
§ 151.79 Runway paving: Second runway; wind conditions. ( a ) *All airports.* Paving a second runway on the basis of wind conditions is eligible for inclusion in a project only if the sponsor shows that— ( 1 ) The airport meets the applicable standards of paragraph (b), (c), or (d) of this section;
( 2 ) The operational experience, and the economic factors of air traffic at the location, justify an additional runway for the airport; and
( 3 ) The second runway is oriented with the existing paved runway to achieve the maximum wind coverage, with due consideration to the airport noise factor, topography, soil conditions, and other pertinent factors affecting the economy and efficiency of the runway development.
( b ) *Airports serving large and small aircraft.* The airport serves both large and small aircraft and the existing paved runway is subject to a crosswind component of more than 15 miles per hour (13 knots) more than 5 percent of the time.
( c ) *Airports serving small aircraft only.* The airport serves small aircraft exclusively, and— ( 1 ) The airport has 10,000, or more, aircraft operations each year; and
( 2 ) The existing paved runway is subject to a crosswind component of more than 12 miles per hour (10.5 knots) more than 5 percent of the time.
( d ) *Airports serving aircraft of less than 8,000 pounds only.* The airport serves small aircraft of less than 8,000 pounds maximum certificated takeoff weight exclusively and— ( 1 ) The airport has 5,000, or more, aircraft operations each year; and
( 2 ) The existing paved runway is subject to a crosswind component of more than 12 miles per hour (10.5 knots) more than 5 percent of the time.
[Amdt. 151-17, 31 FR 16525, Dec. 28, 1966, as amended by Amdt. 151-28, 34 FR 551, Jan. 15, 1969]
§ 1262.103 Proceedings covered. ( a ) The Act applies to the following adversary adjudications conducted by the Agency: ( 1 ) Adjudications under 5 U.S.C. 554 in which the position of NASA or any other agency of the United States, or any component of an agency, is presented by an attorney or other representative who enters an appearance and participates in the proceedings;
( 2 ) Appeals of decisions made pursuant to section 6 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 605) before the Board of Contract Appeals (BCA) as provided in Section 8 of that Act (41 U.S.C. 607);
( 3 ) Any hearing conducted under Chapter 38 of Title 31 (31 U.S.C. 3801, *et seq.,* as amended); and
( 4 ) Adjudications under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb).
( b ) The Act does not apply to: ( 1 ) Any proceeding in which this Agency may prescribe a lawful present or future rate;
( 2 ) Proceedings to grant or renew licenses (note, however, that proceedings to modify, suspend, or revoke licenses are covered if they are otherwise adversary adjudications); and
( 3 ) Proceedings which are covered by a compromise or settlement agreement, unless specifically consented to in such agreement.
( c ) NASA may also designate a proceeding as an adversary adjudication for purposes of the Act by so stating in an order initiating the proceeding or designating the matter for hearing. The Agency's failure to designate a proceeding as an adversary adjudication shall not preclude the filling of an application by a party who believes the proceeding is covered by the Act; whether the proceeding is covered will then be an issue for resolution in proceedings on the application.
( d ) If a proceeding includes both matters covered by the Act and matters specifically excluded from coverage, any award made will include only fees and expenses related to covered issues.
[60 FR 12668, Mar. 8, 1995]
230821 ORD RE MIRO RAMIREZ VERSION AUGUST 21, 2023 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER REGARDING LETTER FILED BY IRIS YOLANDA MIRO RAMIREZ

The Court has received and reviewed the letter dated August 3, 2023 (Docket 

Entry No. 24890 in Case No. 17-3283) (the “Letter”), filed by Iris Yolanda Miro Ramirez, 

appearing pro se. In the Letter, Ms. Miro Ramirez advises the Court that she has not received a 

distribution on account of her claim (Schedule No. 1181628), which was allowed pursuant to the 

Stipulation and Agreed Order Regarding Withdrawal of Lift Stay Motion and Allowance of 

Claim of Iris Yolanda Miro Ramirez (Docket Entry No. 21211 in Case No. 17-3283), entered on 

June 13, 2022.

The Oversight Board is hereby directed to take notice of Ms. Miro Ramirez’s 

Letter and to contact her regarding the status of distributions. To the extent that the Letter

requests further or other relief, such relief is denied.

This Order resolves Docket Entry No. 24890 in Case No. 17-3283.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 21, 2023

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last 

four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth 

of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283- LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) 

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees 

Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17-BK-3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power 

Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17- BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers 

due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24941 Filed:08/21/23 Entered:08/21/23 10:30:07 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0 099 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RUSTY DEWAYNE WAGONER,

Defendant and Appellant .

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until July 20 , 2020 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court June 11 2020

06/11/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0099
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Dennis McGuire, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Dennis McGuire

Dennis McGuire,

Chief Executive Officer



Date:  August 14, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 7108-001]

A final environmental assessment (FEA) is available for public review. The FEA is for an application to surrender the exemption for the Grove Mill Project. The FEA finds that approval of the proposed amendment would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. The Grove Mill Project is located on the Middle River, in Augusta County, Virginia.

The FEA was written by staff in the Office of Energy Projects, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the FEA are available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE, Room 2A, Washington, D.C. 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371. The FEA may be viewed on the web at www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm. Call (202) 208-2222 for assistance.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10956 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit E

Summary of Segal Consulting Hours Worked and Fees Incurred

Name Title Department Hourly Billing

Rate

Total Billed

Hours

Total Fees

Billed

Bridges, Geoffrey W.             Actuary Pension 460.00                        37.70        17,342.00

Clark, Melanie C.                     Sr Health Consultant Health 400.00                          4.40          1,760.00

Hartman, Brian T.                   Sr Analyst Pension 350.00                        61.10        21,385.00

Janus, Paul J                             Actuary Health 430.00                        14.00          6,020.00

Kovach, Patricia L.                  Analyst Health 260.00                        14.30          3,718.00

Libauskas, Jacob                     Actuary Pension 380.00                      212.40        80,712.00

Nicholl, Kim M.                        Senior Vice President Pension 680.00                      124.40        84,592.00

Noonan, Mark J.                     

VP & Consulting Actuary

Health 560.00                        16.50          9,240.00

Strom, Matthew A.                VP & Actuary Pension 550.00                        58.70        32,285.00

Tabernacki, Patryk                  Senior Analyst Pension 330.00                        23.20          7,656.00

Wohl, Stuart                            

SVP Regional Manager

Health 610.00                        20.80        12,688.00

Sub‐Total          587.50     277,398.00

Less 50% Discount on Non‐Working Travel Matter:          (9,082.00)

Total     268,316.00

Case Name: In re Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al.

Case Number:   17 BK 3283‐LTS

Applicant's Name:   Segal Consulting

Date of Application:   July 16, 2018

Interim or Final:   Interim

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3537-5 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 15:58:50 Desc:

Exhibit E Page 1 of 1
#### Moses Hess *v.*Henry Feldkamp.

(No. 9,411.)

A mortgagee, wbo was not a party to a proceeding of foreclosure under which a sale was made, may he called on, by the purchaser at such sale, to exercise his equity of redemption within a reasonable time, or be foreclosed.

*333Special Term. — On demurrer to petition.

The petition sets forth that the plaintiff is in possession of certain premises in Cincinnati, and has a legal title thereto; that he purchased the property at sheriff’s sale; that the sale was made under proceedings of foreclosure, on a mortgage of the premises executed by one Lohman, on the 14th of July, 1852; that other mortgages were on the same property; that defendant Eeldkamp had a mortgage thereon executed in 1855; that proceedings were had in this court for the purpose of foreclosing the mortgage executed by Lohman, and-that defendant Eeldkamp, not being a party to the original proceeding, has an equity of redemption ; and the petition asks that he may be required to come in within a reasonable time and redeem, or else forever be foreclosed.

*Joseph Abraham,*for plaintiff.

*Stallo, Andrews & McCook,*for defendant.

Spencer, J.

A prior mortgagee, who undertakes to fore-

close, is required to make junior mortgagees parties; and if he fails to do so, and the property is sold, the purchaser has,undoubtedly, a right to file a petition, and call on the junior mortgagee to pay up what is due, or else to be foreclosed. This is in harmony with proceedings in courts of equity. It is true that, had the facts been made known when the case was pending, the court would have stayed proceedings until the junior mortgagee could be brought in, for the protection of the mortgagor, as well as for the protection of other incumbrances. Where, by mistake or otherwise, parties have not been properly made, and the title has passed to a purchaser, that purchaser comes in with an independent equity, and may ask that the party should be required to come in within a reasonable time and redeem the property, or that he be forever foreclosed.

Demurrer overruled.
Order filed December 16, 2021 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00518-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF W.B. AND M.B., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-12677

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due November 12, 2021. No brief or motion to extend 

time has been filed. Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before 

December 30, 2021, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 88 (Friday, May 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26190-26191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notice of meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense Retirement Board of Actuaries.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A meeting of the board has been scheduled to execute the 
provisions of Chapter 74, Title 10, United States Code (10 U.S.C. 1464 
et. seq.). The Board shall review DoD actuarial methods and assumptions 
to be used in the valuation of the Military Retirement System. Persons 
desiring to: (1) Attend the DoD Retirement Board of Actuaries meeting 
or, (2) make an oral presentation or submit a written statement for 
consideration at the

[[Page 26191]]

meeting, must notify Wendie Powell at (703) 696-7400 by July 24, 2000. 
Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act.

DATES: August 3, 2000, 1:00 pm to 5:00 pm

ADDRESSES: The Pentagon, Room 1E801-Room 5.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Doyle, Chief Actuary, DoD 
Office of the Actuary, 1555 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 
22209-2405, (703) 696-7407.

    Dated: April 25, 2000.
Patricia L. Topping,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-11192 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Order entered Ju ly 1 7, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00018

- CR

THOMAS EDWARD GRACE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 401

- 80198

- 2009



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.

On June 27, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter’s record had not been filed. On July 3, 2013, we received the reporter’s record.

Therefore, in th e interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the June 27, 2013 order

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE