alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

 as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.,

 Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

MOTION TO WITHDRAW DUPLICATE PROOF OF CLAIM #112806

To the Honorable Court:

Creditor, Cooperativa de Ahorro y Crédito Lomas Verdes (“CLV”), by counsel, 

respectfully states and prays:

1. On May 29, 2018, CLV filed Proof of Claim #36348. 

2. On June 29, 2018, CLV filed Proof of Claim #112806, corresponding to the same 

amount, and for the same concept and facts as Proof of Claim #36348.

1

 

3. Therefore, Proof of Claim #112806 duplicates Proof of Claim #36348.

4. As of the date of filing of this paper, CLV has not received notice of an objection 

to either of the claims herein referenced. 

NOW WHEREFORE, CLV respectfully requests: (i) to voluntarily withdraw only

Proof of Claim #112806 filed on June 29, 2018 and (ii) that this Honorable Court order the 

Claims Agent to reflect the withdrawal of only Proof of Claim #112806 in the Claims Registry, 

with such further relief that is just and proper. 

 

1 Although the entry by Prime Clerk LLC (the “Claims Agent”) of the referenced claims in the 

Claims Registry appears to reflect different amounts, both claims are for the same amount, 

related to the same facts, and for the same concept. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3817 Filed:08/28/18 Entered:08/28/18 13:54:44 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System, which will send notification of such filing to the

CM/ECF participants including Debtors’ counsel and the Acting United States Trustee for 

Region 21. I further certify that, on this same date, I served the foregoing by mail upon any nonCM/ECF participant “Standard Parties” as this term is identified and defined at ¶ II of the CMP 

Order, as amended on April 4, 2018, (ECF Docket No. 2839 of Case No. 17-03283) "Order 

Further Amending Case Management Procedures".

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, in San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 28th day of August, 

2018.

DELGADO-MIRANDA LAW OFFICES

Offices: Calico Court, #173 #2 Rd., Suite 201, 

Guaynabo, PR 00966

Mail: PMB 112, 130 Winston Churchill Ave., Ste. 1

San Juan, PR 00926

T: (787)717-7178

S/BRISEIDA Y. DELGADO-MIRANDA

U.S.D.C.P.R. #223214

E-mail: delgadomirandalaw@gmail.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3817 Filed:08/28/18 Entered:08/28/18 13:54:44 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.674 Interconnected controls.

Each primary flight control system must provide for safe flight and landing and operate independently after a malfunction, failure, or jam of any auxiliary interconnected control.

[Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 8003, Mar. 6, 1990]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT00-27-000]

Take notice that on April 28, 2000, Trunkline LNG Company (TLNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1-A, the following revised tariff sheet to be effective June 1, 2000.

First Revised Sheet No. 4

TLNG states that the purpose of this filing, made in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.106 of the Commission's Regulations, is to revise the system map to shoe the interconnect with Trunkline Gas Company and to delete other images of facilities owned by Trunkline Gas Company.

TLNG states that copies of this filing are being served on all affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11389 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 89 (Monday, May 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel Clinical Trials Network.
    Date: May 18-19, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Radisson Barcelo Hotel, 2121 P Street, NW, Washington, DC 
20037.
    Contact Person: Susan L. Coyle, PhD, Chief, Clinical, 
Epidemiological and Applied Sciences Review Branch, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National 
Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3158, MSC 
9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, (301) 443-2620.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: May 1, 2000.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-11437 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2


**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**


**RULE 13a-14(1) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,**


**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In connection with the quarterly report of House of Brussels Chocolate Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Wesolek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date:
December 15, 2004By:
/s/ Robert WesolekRobert WesolekChief Financial Officer


|
|
|
|

|
|
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL JEROME SULTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D23-199

[May 11, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Lawrence Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No.

562021CF001765A.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil 

Regional Counsel, Fourth District, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Michael Jerome Sulton, Ft. Pierce, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41603

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VICTOR ALBERTO MARTINEZ-GASPAR, also known as Victor Alberto

Gonzalez

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:06-CR-647-ALL

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor Alberto MartinezGaspar raises arguments that are “fully foreclosed” by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is

a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant's motion for summary disposition is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Exhibit 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wesley D. Tate, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                        Date: May 15, 2009

                                        \s\ Wesley D. Tate
                                        ------------------
                                        Wesley D. Tate
                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### § 153.1 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes requirements governing Aviation Safety Inspector access to public-use airports and facilities to perform official duties.
§ 125.21 Application for operating certificate. ( a ) Each applicant for the issuance of an operating certificate must submit an application in a form and manner prescribed by the Administrator to the responsible Flight Standards office in whose area the applicant proposes to establish or has established its principal operations base. The application must be submitted at least 60 days before the date of intended operations.
( b ) Each application submitted under paragraph (a) of this section must contain a signed statement showing the following: ( 1 ) The name and address of each director and each officer or person employed or who will be employed in a management position described in § 125.25.
( 2 ) A list of flight crewmembers with the type of airman certificate held, including ratings and certificate numbers.
[Docket No. 19779, 45 FR 67235, Oct. 9, 1980, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 125-68, 83 FR 9173, Mar. 5, 2018]
EXHIBIT 10.2


 


Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002


 


I, Peter
Hills, director of ONO Finance PLC, certify that to the best of my knowledge
(i) the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of ONO Finance PLC.


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Peter
  Hills

  	
   

  
	
  Name:  Peter Hills

  
	
  Title:  Director

  
	
  Date:

  



 


1
AAM-12-343-E 

May 10, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10532 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0465 

Mr. Gregory S. Betts 

President 

Planet Air, Inc. dba Vertical Solutions 

P.O. Box 9686 

San Juan, PR 00908 

Dear Mr. Betts: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated April 16, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Planet Air, Inc. dba Vertical Solutions (Vertical Solutions), for an exemption from 

part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, 

would allow Vertical Solutions, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to 

cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Vertical Solutions. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Planet Air, Inc. dba Vertical Solutions an exemption from 

14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Vertical Solutions which is operating under 

separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing 

program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Vertical Solutions are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all 

times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Planet Air dba Vertical Solutions part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Duputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  L.  EVAN  BAERGEN,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief Financial Officer,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Green  Fusion  Corporation  for  the  quarterly period ended July 31, 2002 fully
complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report
on  Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and  results  of  operations  of  Green  Fusion  Corporation.


                                            By:       /s/ L. EVAN BAERGEN
                                                      --------------------

                                            Name:     L. EVAN BAERGEN

                                            Title:    Chief Executive Officer &
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

                                            Date:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,792,844
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,931,521
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,931,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          571,460
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,360,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,931,521
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Product Ingredient Review Program

October 1, 2008

Via Email Only

Ms. Cathryn O’Connell

Chemical Review Manager

US EPA/OPP/SRRD

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20460

RE: Pyrethrin Steering Committee/Joint Ventu r e

Dear Ms. O’Connell

The Pyrethrin Steering Committee/Joint Venture (PJV), membership list attached, operating under the

auspices of the Consumer Specialty Products Association (CSPA), is writing as a fo llow up to your

discussions with Nasser Assaf on the food handling establishments use rates for Pyrethrins. We have

contacted all PJV members who have this use and discussed the use rate issue.

It turns out that everyone was operating on the assumption that the rate is 0.0033 lb ai /1000 ct as was

originally submitted in the Pyrethrin Master Label and not as was indicated in the final RED (0.00033 lb

ai 1000 cf). We also reviewed the documents you sent from earlier correspondence between you and the

PJ V on this issue. The main conclusion we reached is that the PJV letter in the correspondence dated 4

-

14

- 05 was in error as it lumped the space spray for food handling with other space spray sites. The space

spray MOEs the PJV used are based on human expo sure (particularly children), which does not apply to

the food handling applications. The food handling applications involve worker exposure as well as dietary

exposure from residues on stored/treated. The worker exposure is not an issue here and the dieta ry

exposure was addressed by a metered aerosol residue trial. We believe the metered aerosol residue trial

that was submitted by the PJV supports the food handling use rate of 0.0033 lb ai/1000 cf.

The food handling applications are the biggest single us e for pyrethrins. The current use rate stated in the

RED does not provide the required efficacy. Therefore, the PJV would like to request a review of the

food handling rates and the correction of the space spray rate from 0.00033 lb ai / 1000 cf to 0.003 3 lb ai /

1000 cf.

If it is possible, we would greatly appreciate you looking into our request before the DCI is issued. Please

contact me if you have questions. Thank you.

Best regards,

Susan E. Little

Executive Director, PIR Program

For the Pyrethrin Steering Committee/Joint Venture

Cc: Pyrethrin Joint Venture MembersPyrethrin Joint Venture

October 2008

Botanical Resources Australia

Tasmania, AUSTRALIA, 7005

S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.

Racine, WI 53403

McLaugh lin Gormley King Co.

Minneapolis, MN 55427

Prentiss Incorporated

Floral Park, NY 11001

Pyrethrin Board of Kenya

Nakuru, KENYA, E.AFRICA

Societe du Pyrethre au Rwanda (SOPYRWA)

Ruhengeri, Kigali, RWANDA

Tanzania Pyrethrum Processing and Marketing Co.

Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, East Africa

Valent BioSciences Corporation

Libertyville, IL

Whitmire Microgen

St. Louis, MO 63122