alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 7A 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 1 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 2 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 3 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 4 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 5 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 6 of 13
EXHIBIT 7B 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 7 of 13
DEF EX D

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 8 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 9 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 10 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 11 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 12 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-7 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2016-014 (7A Spanish 7B English) Page 13 of 13
25-CS-041311

BOARD OF HEALTH

Paul M. King, Esq., Q.E.P.

Chair

Lee Harrison, M.D.

Vice Chair

Al M. Ahmed, P.E.

Rev. Ricky V. Burgess

Donald S. Burke, M.D.

Hon. Joan Cleary, R.N.

James M. Flynn, Jr.

William Youngblood

DIRECTOR

Bruce W. Dixon, M.D.

April 19, 2011

Ms. Joyce Epps, Director

Department of Environmental Protection

Bureau of Air Quality

Rachel Carson Building

400 Market Street, P.O. Box 8468

Harrisburg, PA 17105-8468

Dear Ms. Epps:

Enclosed is one paper copy of Allegheny County’s portion of the Pennsylvania State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) for the Attainment and Maintenance of the 1997 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards for the Liberty-Clairton area. The narrative portion of the SIP is enclosed in the binder 

along with a DVD of the SIP and supporting documents. This SIP revision is being tracked as our 

Revision Tracking Number 67.

This SIP revision is a modification to the SIP revision previously submitted to PA DEP in June 2010. 

Allegheny County Health Department is requesting a 5-year extension for attainment for this SIP, 

based on the timeframe required for implementation of the proposed controls. This SIP also utilizes 

the CALPUFF model in a near-field application, for reasons outlined in the model protocol (given in 

Appendix C). These issues should be included in the PA DEP letter to EPA Region III.

We request that the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection approve this revision and 

forward the hard copy to the U.S. EPA Region III with a recommendation for approval.

Sincerely,

 

James Thompson, Manager

Air Quality Program

cc: Arleen Shulman

Stephen Hepler

Enclosure

PM2.5 SIP and Appendices and DVD

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

301 39th Street – Bldg. #7

Pittsburgh, PA 15201-1891

Phone: (412) 578-8115

Fax: (412) 578-8144
§ 27.725 Limit drop test. The limit drop test must be conducted as follows: ( a ) The drop height must be— ( 1 ) 13 inches from the lowest point of the landing gear to the ground; or
( 2 ) Any lesser height, not less than eight inches, resulting in a drop contact velocity equal to the greatest probable sinking speed likely to occur at ground contact in normal power-off landings.
( b ) If considered, the rotor lift specified in § 27.473(a) must be introduced into the drop test by appropriate energy absorbing devices or by the use of an effective mass.
( c ) Each landing gear unit must be tested in the attitude simulating the landing condition that is most critical from the standpoint of the energy to be absorbed by it.
( d ) When an effective mass is used in showing compliance with paragraph (b) of this section, the following formula may be used instead of more rational computations:
where: *W* *e* = the effective weight to be used in the drop test (lbs.); *W* = *W* *M* for main gear units (lbs.), equal to the static reaction on the particular unit with the rotorcraft in the most critical attitude. A rational method may be used in computing a main gear static reaction, taking into consideration the moment arm between the main wheel reaction and the rotorcraft center of gravity. *W* = *W* *N* for nose gear units (lbs.), equal to the vertical component of the static reaction that would exist at the nose wheel, assuming that the mass of the rotorcraft acts at the center of gravity and exerts a force of 1.0*g* downward and 0.25*g* forward. *W* = *W* *T* for tailwheel units (lbs.), equal to whichever of the following is critical: (1) The static weight on the tailwheel with the rotorcraft resting on all wheels; or (2) The vertical component of the ground reaction that would occur at the tailwheel, assuming that the mass of the rotorcraft acts at the center of gravity and exerts a force of l*g* downward with the rotorcraft in the maximum nose-up attitude considered in the nose-up landing conditions. *h* = specified free drop height (inches). *L* = ration of assumed rotor lift to the rotorcraft weight. *d* = deflection under impact of the tire (at the proper inflation pressure) plus the vertical component of the axle travels (inches) relative to the drop mass. *n* = limit inertia load factor. *n* *j* = the load factor developed, during impact, on the mass used in the drop test (i.e., the acceleration *dv/dt* in *g*'s recorded in the drop test plus 1.0).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,647,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    219,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,562,316
<PP&E>                                       4,268,872
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,034,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,619,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,461,206
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,696
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,334,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,619,353
<SALES>                                         37,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,020
<CGS>                                           69,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  460,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,419,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,751,992)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,751,992)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,751,992)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. JIM STRANGE, Appellant.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

May 7, 1912.

CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS: Appellate Practice: Sufficiency of Record. In an appeal from a conviction for a misdemeanor, the certified copy of the judgment and order granting the appeal, which were the only records filed in the appellate court, are examined and *held*to he free from error.

Appeal from Knox Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *Charles D. Stewart,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*Noah W. Simpson*and *James C. Dorian*for appellant.

*301
      *Claude M. Smith*and *E. A. Daniel*for respondent.

NOETONI, J.

Defendant was tried by a jury and convicted of a misdemeanor in tbe circuit court of Knox county and prosecutes this appeal from that judgment. No abstracts or briefs are on file here for either party, neither is the information, on which the trial was had, before us. The appeal is prosecuted on the short form provided for in section 2048, Ee.vised Statutes 1909, which requires the presentation in the appellate court of a certified copy of the judgment only and the order granting the appeal,- in order to confer jurisdiction. The files disclose such certified copy of the judgment, which reveals that defendant'was convicted of a misdemeanor and his punishment assessed by the jury at a fine of twenty dollars, together with an order granting the appeal, and nothing more. Though no other record is before us and though no briefs have been filed, we have examined this record, as the statutes require, and find it in all respects regular and sufficient. The judgment should, therefore be affirmed. It is so ordered.

*Reynolds, P. J.,*and *Caulfield, J.,*concur.
§ 27.607 Fasteners. ( a ) Each removable bolt, screw, nut, pin, or other fastener whose loss could jeopardize the safe operation of the rotorcraft must incorporate two separate locking devices. The fastener and its locking devices may not be adversely affected by the environmental conditions associated with the particular installation.
( b ) No self-locking nut may be used on any bolt subject to rotation in operation unless a nonfriction locking device is used in addition to the self-locking device.
[Amdt. 27-4, 33 FR 14533, Sept. 27, 1968]
Agenda for Conference Call 

Christopher Lambesis, Todd Ramaly, 

Terri Zick to: woodgl@trimatrixlabs.com , 

glaserj@trimatrixlabs.com 

Cc: Kathy Wilson 

07/08/2010 11:18 AM 

From: Terri Zick <tzick@cticompanies.com> 

To: Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Todd Ramaly/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, 

"woodgl@trimatrixlabs.com" <woodgl@trimatrixlabs.com>, "glaserj@trimatrixlabs.com" 

<glaserj@trimatrixlabs.com> 

Cc: Kathy Wilson <kathywilson@owossographic.com> 

The following areas of discussion are expected during the upcoming conference call at 3pm eastern / 

2pm Central today (7/8/10). 

1. Discussion of the intent and purpose of NMP analysis (waste samples and raw product), 

2. Discussion of bench notes associated with preparation of the raw product NMP sample, 

3. Amendments to lab narrative that reflect failure of numerous unrelated QA/QC 

parameters (in particular, phenols). 

4. Discussion of 4% recovery of NMP in the raw sample and relationship to control limits, 

5. Discussion of dilution used for the raw sample as presented in the raw data, 

6. Calculations used to generate the concentrations of detectable NMP 

7. Any other remaining outstanding issues affecting the delisting 

Please let me know if I have misrepresented the issues/concerns in the above list of discussion points. 

We all seek to resolve these issues today, so please advise me right away if there are additional points 

to be covered at the meeting. 

Thank you 

Terri Zick 

313-300-7401 cell 

tzick@cticompanies.com 

CTI and Associates, Inc. 

51331 W. Pontiac Trail, Wixom, Ml 48393 

248.486.5100 Phone / 248.486.5050 Fax 

The information contained in this electronic message is privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the 

individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible 

to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is 

neither allowed nor intended. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail or by 
calling 800-CTI-TODAY and delete the message. Thank You!
**Exhibit 5.3**

 

**Consent ofDorian L. (Dusty) Nicol**

 

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Annual Report”) of QueenstakeResources Ltd. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission.

 

I hereby consent to the references to my nameunder the heading “Narrative Description of the Business — Principal OperatingProperty — Jerritt Canyon Mine — Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimates” in theCompany’s Annual Information Form and to all other references to my nameincluded or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and in the Company’sRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-119779), whichincorporates by reference the Annual Report.

 

 

Very truly yours

 

 
| /s/ Dorian L. Nicol  |                                   |   |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:                | Dorian L. Nicol                        |   |
| Title:               | President and Chief Executive Officer, |   |
|                 | Queenstake  Resources Ltd.             |   |
|                 |                                   |   |
| March 30,  2006 |                                   |
|                      |                                        |        |  |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.52 Airport to airport application, accessorial services.

Tariffs shall specify whether or not the fares therein include services in addition to airport-to-airport transportation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1000

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                      2,709
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                               3,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                               130,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          144,934
<PP&E>                                    154,183
<DEPRECIATION>                            100,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            213,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      97,357
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                20,000
<COMMON>                                       58
<OTHER-SE>                                 85,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              213,044
<SALES>                                   253,679
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          253,679
<CGS>                                     195,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             195,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           98,876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (42,906)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (3,725)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             1,823
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (37,358)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (2.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (2.41)




</TABLE>
§ 27.927 Additional tests. ( a ) Any additional dynamic, endurance, and operational tests, and vibratory investigations necessary to determine that the rotor drive mechanism is safe, must be performed.
( b ) If turbine engine torque output to the transmission can exceed the highest engine or transmission torque rating limit, and that output is not directly controlled by the pilot under normal operating conditions (such as where the primary engine power control is accomplished through the flight control), the following test must be made: ( 1 ) Under conditions associated with all engines operating, make 200 applications, for 10 seconds each, or torque that is at least equal to the lesser of— ( i ) The maximum torque used in meeting § 27.923 plus 10 percent; or
( ii ) The maximum attainable torque output of the engines, assuming that torque limiting devices, if any, function properly.
( 2 ) For multiengine rotorcraft under conditions associated with each engine, in turn, becoming inoperative, apply to the remaining transmission torque inputs the maximum torque attainable under probable operating conditions, assuming that torque limiting devices, if any, function properly. Each transmission input must be tested at this maximum torque for at least 15 minutes.
( 3 ) The tests prescribed in this paragraph must be conducted on the rotorcraft at the maximum rotational speed intended for the power condition of the test and the torque must be absorbed by the rotors to be installed, except that other ground or flight test facilities with other appropriate methods of torque absorption may be used if the conditions of support and vibration closely simulate the conditions that would exist during a test on the rotorcraft.
( c ) It must be shown by tests that the rotor drive system is capable of operating under autorotative conditions for 15 minutes after the loss of pressure in the rotor drive primary oil system.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, 72 Stat. 752, 775, 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423; sec. 6(c), 49 U.S.C. 1655(c))
[Amdt. 27-2, 33 FR 963, Jan. 26, 1968, as amended by Amdt. 27-12, 42 FR 15045, Mar. 17, 1977; Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34212, Sept. 2, 1988]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 89 (Monday, May 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11381]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Revised Land and Resource Management Plan for the White Mountain 
National Forest; Carroll, Coos, and Grafton Counties, New Hampshire and 
Oxford County, Maine

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of extension of public comment period on notice of 
intent for fourteen days.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service published a White Mountain National Forest 
Land and Resource Management Plan in the Federal Register on March 9, 
2000 (Vol. 65, No. 47, FR 12505, Mar. 9, 2000). The Forest Service is 
extending the public comment period on that notice of Intent. A 14 day 
extension of the public comment period was given in response to 
comments from the public requesting additional time to fully analyze 
the issues and prepare comprehensive comments. The fourteen (14) day 
extensions starts immediately after the initial public comment period 
that ends May 9, 2000. The fourteen (14) day extension of the public 
comment period starts May 10, 2000 and ends May 23, 2000.
    Additional information on the Notice of Intent can be found in the 
notice published in the Federal Register referenced above.

DATES: Comments on the Notice of Intent should be received in writing 
by May 23, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: Forest Planning, White Mountain 
National Forest, 719 N. Main St., Laconia, NH 03246. Or direct 
electronic mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aec3d9c1c1caccdbdcd7eec8dd80c8cbca80dbdd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f9948e96969d9b8c8b80b99f8ad79f9c9dd78c8a">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Armel, Forest Planner, at (603) 
528-8788. TDD (603) 528-8722. E-mail address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90f2f1e2fdf5fcd0f6e3bef6f5f4bee5e3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b0d2d1c2ddd5dcf0d6c39ed6d5d49ec5c3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The responsible official is Robert T. 
Jacobs, Regional Forester, Eastern Region, 210 W. Wisconsin Avenue, 
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203.

    Dated: May 2, 2000.
Donna L. Hepp,
Forest Supervisor, White Mountain National Forest.
[FR Doc. 00-11381 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert Chmiel, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of Consolidated Energy, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 30, 2005

/s/Robert Chmiel

Robert Chmiel

Interim Chief Financial Officer







1