alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.6 Manufacture of new aircraft, aircraft engines, and propellers. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, no person may manufacture a new aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller based on a type certificate unless the person— ( 1 ) Is the holder of the type certificate or has a licensing agreement from the holder of the type certificate to manufacture the product; and
( 2 ) Meets the requirements of subpart F or G of this part.
( b ) A person may manufacture one new aircraft based on a type certificate without meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section if that person can provide evidence acceptable to the FAA that the manufacture of the aircraft by that person began before August 5, 2004.
( c ) The requirements of this section do not apply to— ( 1 ) New aircraft imported under the provisions of §§ 21.183(c), 21.184(b), or 21.185(c); and
( 2 ) New aircraft engines or propellers imported under the provisions of § 21.500.
[Doc. No. FAA-2003-14825, 71 FR 52258, Sept. 1, 2006]
SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (LEVIN) AS OF 01/10/03




 
Exhibit 10.10

 
SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
AS OF JANUARY 10, 2003 
 
WHEREAS, Casual
Male Retail Group, Inc., (formerly Designs, Inc., “CMRG”) and David A. Levin (“Executive”) entered into a certain Employment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2000, as amended by Letter Agreement dated April 10, 2001 (hereinafter
referred to as the “Agreement”); and 
 
WHEREAS, Company
and Executive wish to amend, modify and/or restate certain terms, provisions, conditions, and covenants of the Agreement. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and of the promises, covenants, conditions and agreements contained herein, and for One Dollar ($1.00)
and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby expressly acknowledged, the Company and Executive hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 
 

	 	1.	 	Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is hereby substituted in lieu thereof: 

 

	 	“2.	 	TERM 

 
The initial term of employment under this Agreement shall begin on April 10, 2000 (“Employment Date”) and shall continue for a
period of three (3) years from that date subject to prior termination in accordance with the terms hereof. This Agreement shall automatically be extended for an additional one (1) year term on each anniversary date of the Employment Date unless
either party shall give the other at least ninety (90) days written notice prior to such anniversary date that it will not renew this Agreement.” 
 

	 	2.	 	Except as herein specifically modified and amended, all of the terms, provisions, conditions, and covenants of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect
and shall be deemed unchanged except to the extent modified and amended herein. 

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to Employment Agreement as a sealed instrument, in any number of counterpart copies, each of which shall be deemed an original
for all purposes, as of the day and year first written above. 
 
CASUAL MALE RETAIL GROUP, INC. (Company) 
 

	 By:
	 	 /s/ Dennis R. Hernreich  

	 	 	 	 	 	 January 30, 2003


	 	 	 Dennis R. Hernreich
 Executive Vice President,

 Chief Operating Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 Date


 

	
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Arlence C. Feldman

	 	 	 	 	 	 January 24, 2003


	 	 	 Arlene C. Feldman
 Assistant Secretary
	 	 	 	 	 	 Date

	
	 	 	 Executive
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
	 	 	 /s/ David A. Levin

	 	 	 	 	 	 January 30, 2003


	 	 	 David A. Levin
	 	 	 	 	 	 Date
#### § 25.957 Flow between interconnected tanks.

If fuel can be pumped from one tank to another in flight, the fuel tank vents and the fuel transfer system must be designed so that no structural damage to the tanks can occur because of overfilling.
EXHIBIT B

CUSTOMARY AND COMPARABLE COMPENSATION

DISCLOSURES

(See Guidelines ¶ C.3. for definitions of terms used in this Exhibit.)

CATEGORY

OF 

TIMEKEEPER

(using categories 

already maintained 

by the firm)

BLENDED HOURLY RATE

NONBANKRUPTCY 

BLENDED 

HOURLY RATE

CONTINENTAL 

BLENDED 

HOURLY RATE1

CONTINENTAL 

BLENDED 

HOURLY RATE

(AFTER 20%

REDUCTION)2

Partner $702.00 $557.23 $445.78

Counsel N/A N/A N/A

Associate $450.00 $356.72 $285.37

All timekeepers 

aggregated $546.50 $411.29 $329.03

1 The calculation of Continental’s Blended Hourly Rate does not take into account Continental’s agreement to reduce 

its fees by an amount equal to 20% of its total hourly fees. 

2 For illustrative purposes only.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24740-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 15:19:47 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,954
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,971
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,925
<PP&E>                                          12,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,200)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,377
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,218
<OTHER-SE>                                    (68,550)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,045
<SALES>                                       (58,671)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (58,671)
<CGS>                                           54,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (61,868)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.004)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Serge Godin, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of CGI Group Inc.; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: December 23, 2005

/s/ Serge Godin
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Zaxis International Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ivo Heiden, CEO and CFO ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ivo Heiden

Ivo HeidenCEO and CFODated: May 20, 2009

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zaxis International Inc. and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
§ 25.1415 Ditching equipment. ( a ) Ditching equipment used in airplanes to be certificated for ditching under § 25.801, and required by the operating rules of this chapter, must meet the requirements of this section.
( b ) Each liferaft and each life preserver must be approved. In addition— ( 1 ) Unless excess rafts of enough capacity are provided, the buoyancy and seating capacity beyond the rated capacity of the rafts must accommodate all occupants of the airplane in the event of a loss of one raft of the largest rated capacity; and
( 2 ) Each raft must have a trailing line, and must have a static line designed to hold the raft near the airplane but to release it if the airplane becomes totally submerged.
( c ) Approved survival equipment must be attached to each liferaft.
( d ) There must be an approved survival type emergency locator transmitter for use in one life raft.
( e ) For airplanes not certificated for ditching under § 25.801 and not having approved life preservers, there must be an approved flotation means for each occupant. This means must be within easy reach of each seated occupant and must be readily removable from the airplane.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-29, 36 FR 18722, Sept. 21, 1971; Amdt. 25-50, 45 FR 38348, June 9, 1980; Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29785, July 20, 1990; Amdt. 25-82, 59 FR 32057, June 21, 1994]
§ 271.3 Carrier subsidy need. In establishing the subsidy for an air carrier providing essential air service at an eligible place, the Department will consider the following: ( a ) The reasonable projected costs of a carrier in serving that place;
( b ) The carrier's reasonable projected revenues for serving that place;
( c ) The appropriate size of aircraft for providing essential air service at that place; and
( d ) A reasonable profit for a carrier serving that place.
[ER-1398, 49 FR 49846, Dec. 24, 1984, as amended at 60 FR 43524, Aug. 22, 1995]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of aQuantive, Inc. (the "COMPANY") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "FORM 10-Q"), I, Brian P. McAndrews,
the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 8, 2006

                                        /s/ BRIAN P. MCANDREWS
                                        -------------------------------------
                                             Brian P. McAndrews
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  President
#### SMITH v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 17, 1915.)

Appeal from Covington Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. P!earoe.

A. Wi-ialey, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and W. H. Mitci-iell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.'

Ti-iomas, J.

Affirmed on authority of *Hodge v. State,*11 Ala. App. 185, 65 South. 676; *Watson v. State,*11 Ala. App. 199, 65 South. 689; *Herring v. State,*11 Ala. App. 202, 65 South. 707, and *Stokes v. State, infra,*69 South. 303.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.128 Tests: aircraft engines. ( a ) Each person manufacturing aircraft engines under a type certificate must subject each engine (except rocket engines for which the manufacturer must establish a sampling technique) to an acceptable test run that includes the following: ( 1 ) Break-in runs that include a determination of fuel and oil consumption and a determination of power characteristics at rated maximum continuous power or thrust and, if applicable, at rated takeoff power or thrust.
( 2 ) At least five hours of operation at rated maximum continuous power or thrust. For engines having a rated takeoff power or thrust higher than rated maximum continuous power or thrust, the five-hour run must include 30 minutes at rated takeoff power or thrust.
( b ) The test runs required by paragraph (a) of this section may be made with the engine appropriately mounted and using current types of power and thrust measuring equipment.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14568, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-5, 32 FR 3735, Mar. 4, 1967]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 84 (Monday, May 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25328-25329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank

[[Page 25329]]

holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, 
control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding 
company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank 
holding company, including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 25, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Compass Bancshares, Inc., Birmingham, Alabama; to merge with 
Founders Bancorp, Inc., Scottsdale, Arizona, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Founders Bank of Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Keene Bancorp, Inc., 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan and 
Trust, Keene, Texas; to acquire 46.29 percent of the voting shares of 
Keene Bancorp, Inc., Keene, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Nichols Bancshares, Inc., Dover, Delaware, and First State Bank, Keene, 
Texas.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 25, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-10701 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 25.33 Propeller speed and pitch limits. ( a ) The propeller speed and pitch must be limited to values that will ensure— ( 1 ) Safe operation under normal operating conditions; and
( 2 ) Compliance with the performance requirements of §§ 25.101 through 25.125.
( b ) There must be a propeller speed limiting means at the governor. It must limit the maximum possible governed engine speed to a value not exceeding the maximum allowable r.p.m.
( c ) The means used to limit the low pitch position of the propeller blades must be set so that the engine does not exceed 103 percent of the maximum allowable engine rpm or 99 percent of an approved maximum overspeed, whichever is greater, with— ( 1 ) The propeller blades at the low pitch limit and governor inoperative;
( 2 ) The airplane stationary under standard atmospheric conditions with no wind; and
( 3 ) The engines operating at the takeoff manifold pressure limit for reciprocating engine powered airplanes or the maximum takeoff torque limit for turbopropeller engine-powered airplanes.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-57, 49 FR 6848, Feb. 23, 1984; Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29774, July 20, 1990]
#### James PIGG *v.*ASHLEY COUNTY NEWSPAPER Inc.

5-6138

489 S.W. 2d 17

Opinion delivered January 15, 1973

*757
      *James M. Barker Jr.,*for appellant.

*Richard E. Griffin,*for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

This suit in libel was instituted by appellant for the publication by appellee of an unsigned letter to the editor. Appellant contended the article accused him of indecent exposure. The appeal is from the granting of a demurrer to the complaint.

In determining whether the content was libelous we must construe the entire article. *Skaggs*v. *Johnson,*105 Ark. 254, 150 S.W. 1036 (1912). Before appellant can recover there must be a libelous statement in the article which, “by proper inducement and colloquium”, may be said to apply personally to appellant. *Comes*v. *Cruce,*85 Ark. 79, 107 S.W. 185 (1908).

The article made several charges against Crossett policemen as a class. It charged that some policemen did not like boys with long hair; that those policemen should “take a look at their own record, such as indecent exposure and other things”; that one of the author’s boys was arrested for trespassing on a public tennis court; that another son was arrested for driving up to the schoolhouse door; that the jail was filled with young boys while murderers and ¿funks went free; that bootleggers and dope peddlers were all over the town; that the writer was threatened with arrest if she went to the school other than on school business. After the recitation of those various counts a personal reference was made to appellant. that reference being that the writer would not buy anything from Crossett merchants until appellant was removed from the police force.

It would be sheer speculation to say that of the many charges enumerated by the writer, she specifically *758referred to appellant with reference to the charge of indecent exposure.

Affirmed.
---

Exhibit 12.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Chelsea Oil and Gas,
Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, William Petrie, Sr., Executive Chairman of the Company, and
Jesse Meidl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

By:
    /s/
      William Petrie, Sr.William Petrie, Sr.Executive Chairman, Chelsea Oil and Gas, Ltd.


By:
    /s/
      Jesse MeidlJesse MeidlChief Executive Officer, Chelsea Oil and Gas,
      Ltd.


April 30, 2015

---