alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                         EX-21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      SUBSIDIARY                                    JURISDICTION
--------------------------------                    ------------
<S>                                                 <C>
Larson-Juhl US LLC                                   Georgia
Larson-Juhl International, L.L.C                     Georgia
Robert F. de Castro, Inc.                            Louisiana
Glass Corporation of America, Inc.                   Louisiana
Larson-Juhl Canada Ltd.                              Canada
Larson-Juhl Wels GmbH                                Austria
Nottling Larson-Juhl GmbH                            Austria
Larson-Juhl Germany GmbH                             Germany
Larson-Juhl Rahmen GmbH & Co. Handels-KG             Germany
Larson-Juhl Rahmen GmbH                              Germany
Larson-Juhl France, L.L.C.                           Georgia
Larson-Juhl France S.A.R.L.                          France
Senelar Larson-Juhl SA                               France
Larson-Juhl Hellas Picture Frames S.A.               Greece
LAC-ART Larson-Juhl Single Partner L.L.C.            Greece
Larson-Juhl Netherlands, L.L.C.                      Georgia
Larson-Juhl Netherlands B.V.                         Netherlands
Dutch Frame Company B.V.                             Netherlands
Styling Design Barneveld B.V.                        Netherlands
Lever's Lijstenfabriek B.V.                          Netherlands
Larson-Juhl Training and Equipment B.V.              Netherlands
ERIJKO Lijsten B.V.                                  Netherlands
Barth Lijsten Boxtel B.V.                            Netherlands
</TABLE>


<PAGE>   2

<TABLE>
<S>                                                 <C>
Barth Lijsten Nederland B.V.                         Netherlands
Larson-Juhl Seoul, L.L.C.                            Georgia
Larson-Juhl Korea, L.L.C.                            Georgia
Larson-Juhl Korea Limited                            Korea
Lira, A.S.                                           Czech Republic
Northampton Acquisition Limited                      U.K.
Magnolia Group Limited                               U.K.
Arquati U.K. Limited                                 U.K.
Larson-Juhl (UK) Limited                             U.K.
Larson-Juhl South Africa L.L.C.                      Georgia
Larson-Juhl Sweden A.B.                              Sweden
Tranaslist, A.B.                                     Sweden
Heinonsalo Larson-Juhl Oy                            Finland
Larson-Juhl Baltic                                   Latvia
Halvorsens Larson-Juhl, A.S.                         Norway
Larson-Juhl Nippon Corporation                       Japan
Larson-Juhl Italia s.r.l.                            Italy
Arcobalegno s.r.l.                                   Italy
Larson-Juhl Australia, L.L.C.                        Georgia
</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4116 

To extend the authority for commitments for the paycheck protection program 

and separate amounts authorized for other loans under section 7(a) 

of the Small Business Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 30, 2020 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. COONS, Ms. 

ROSEN, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To extend the authority for commitments for the paycheck 

protection program and separate amounts authorized for 

other loans under section 7(a) of the Small Business 

Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4116 CPS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENDING AUTHORITY FOR COMMITMENTS 

2 FOR THE PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM 

3 AND SEPARATING AMOUNTS AUTHORIZED 

4 FOR OTHER 7(A) LOANS. 

5 Section 1102(b) of title I of division A of the 

6 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (Pub7 lic Law 116–136) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(b) COMMITMENTS FOR PPP AND OTHER 7(A) 

9 LOANS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) PPP LOANS.—During the period begin11 ning on February 15, 2020 and ending on August 

12 8, 2020, the amount authorized for commitments 

13 under paragraph (36) of section 7(a) of the Small 

14 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) shall be 

15 $659,000,000,000. 

16 ‘‘(2) OTHER 7(A) LOANS.—During fiscal year 

17 2020, the amount authorized for commitments for 

18 section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

19 636(a)) under the heading ‘BUSINESS LOANS PRO20 GRAM ACCOUNT’ under the heading ‘SMALL BUSI21 NESS ADMINISTRATION’ under title V of the Consoli22 dated Appropriations Act, 2020 (Public Law 116– 

23 93; 133 Stat. 2475) shall apply with respect to any 

24 commitments under such section 7(a) other than 

25 under paragraph (36) of such section 7(a).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO INTERBRANCH COMMISSION FOR GENDER, RACIAL

, AND ETHNIC FAIRNESS :

:

:

:

: NO. 592

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18 th d ay of April , 20 2 3

, Rita G. Alexyn, Esquire

, Tioga County

, is

hereby appointed as a m ember of the Interbranch Commission for Gender, Racial, and

Ethnic Fairness for a term expiring December 31, 202 4

.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4116 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4116

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend the authority for commitments for the paycheck protection 
 program and separate amounts authorized for other loans under section 
        7(a) of the Small Business Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENDING AUTHORITY FOR COMMITMENTS FOR THE PAYCHECK 
              PROTECTION PROGRAM AND SEPARATING AMOUNTS AUTHORIZED FOR 
              OTHER 7(A) LOANS.

    Section 1102(b) of title I of division A of the Coronavirus Aid, 
Relief, and Economic Security Act (Public Law 116-136) is amended to 
read as follows:
    ``(b) Commitments for PPP and Other 7(a) Loans.--
            ``(1) PPP loans.--During the period beginning on February 
        15, 2020 and ending on August 8, 2020, the amount authorized 
        for commitments under paragraph (36) of section 7(a) of the 
        Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) shall be 
        $659,000,000,000.
            ``(2) Other 7(a) loans.--During fiscal year 2020, the 
        amount authorized for commitments for section 7(a) of the Small 
        Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) under the heading `business 
        loans program account' under the heading `Small Business 
        Administration' under title V of the Consolidated 
        Appropriations Act, 2020 (Public Law 116- 93; 133 Stat. 2475) 
        shall apply with respect to any commitments under such section 
        7(a) other than under paragraph (36) of such section 7(a).''.

            Passed the Senate June 30, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4116

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend the authority for commitments for the paycheck protection 
 program and separate amounts authorized for other loans under section 
        7(a) of the Small Business Act, and for other purposes.
```
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DIST RICT OF TEXAS F ORT WORTH

N O

. 2 - 1 0 - 0 4 2 - C V

I N T H E I N T E R E S T O F K

. D

. H

. , A C H I L D

- - - - - - - - - - - - F R O M T H E 3 2 3 R D D I S T R I C T C O U R T O F T A R R A N T C O U N T Y

- - - - - - - - - - - - 

### M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N 1 

### AN D J U D G M E N T

- - - - - - - - - - - - O n A p r i l 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 , w e n o t i f i e d A p p e l l a n t t h a t h e r b r i e f h a d n o t b e e n f i l e d a s

r e q u i r e d b y T e x a s R u l e o f A p p e l l a t e P r o c e d u r e 3 8

. 6 ( a )

. S e e T e x

. R

. A p p

. P

. 3 8

. 6 ( a )

. W e s t a t e d w e c o u l d d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l f o r w a n t o f p r o s e c u t i o n u n l e s s A p p e l l a n t o r a n y p a r t y d e s i r i n g t o c o n t i n u e t h i s a p p e a l f i l e d w i t h t h e c o u r t w i t h i n t e n d a y s a r e s p o n s e s h o w i n g g r o u n d s f o r c o n t i n u i n g t h e a p p e a l

. S e e T e x

. R

. A p p

. P

. 4 2

. 3

. N o r e s p o n s e h a v i n g b e e n r e c e i v e d , o n M a y 1 1 , 2 0 1 0 , w e a b a t e d t h i s a p p e a l

a n d r e m a n d e d t h e c a s e t o t h e t r i a l c o u r t t o c o n d u c t a h e a r i n g t o d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r A p p e l l a n t d e s i r e s t o c o n t i n u e t h i s a p p e a l a n d a p p o i n t n e w a p p e l l a t e c o u n s e l i f

1  S e e T e x

. R

. A p p

. P

. 4 7

. 4

.n e c e s s a r y

. O n J u n e 1 4 , 2 0 1 0 , w e r e c e i v e d a s u p p l e m e n t a l c l e r k ’ s r e c o r d , a n d o n

J u n e 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 , w e r e c e i v e d t h e r e p o r t e r ’ s r e c o r d f r o m t h e a b a t e m e n t h e a r i n g

c o n d u c t e d p u r s u a n t t o o u r M a y 1 1 , 2 0 1 0 a b a t e m e n t o r d e r

. T h e s u p p l e m e n t a l c l e r k ’ s

r e c o r d a n d t h e r e p o r t e r ’ s r e c o r d c o n f i r m t h a t A p p e l l a n t h a s d e c i d e d n o t t o f u r t h e r
p u r s u e t h i s a p p e a l

. B e c a u s e A p p e l l a n t ’ s b r i e f h a s n o t b e e n f i l e d a n d t h e a p p e l l a t e r e c o r d c o n f i r m s t h a t A p p e l l a n t h a s d e c i d e d n o t t o f u r t h e r p u r s u e t h i s a p p e a l , w e d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l
f o r w a n t o f p r o s e c u t i o n

. S e e T e x

. R

. A p p

. P

. 3 8

. 8 ( a ) , 4 2

. 3 ( b ) , 4 3

. 2 ( f )

.

P E R C U R I A M
P A N E L : G A R D N E R , W A L K E R , a n d M C C O Y , J J

. D E L I V E R E D : J u n e 2 4 , 2 0 1 0

2
#### § 25.459 Special devices.

The loading for special devices using aerodynamic surfaces (such as slots, slats and spoilers) must be determined from test data.

[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29776, July 20, 1990]
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

#### § 21.313 Duration.

A PMA is effective until surrendered, withdrawn, or the FAA otherwise terminates it.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 89 (Monday, May 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11352]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. GT00-26-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

May 2, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 21, 2000, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing, with an effective date of April 1, 2000.
    Transco states that the purpose of the filing is to update certain 
Delivery Point Entitlement (DPE) tariff sheets in accordance with the 
provisions of Section 19 of the General Terms and Conditions of 
Transco's Third Revised Volume No. 1. Transco states that the tariff 
sheets have been revised to include changes as a result of the 
termination of the Rate Schedule FT service agreement with Prior Energy 
Corporation and the associated open season. Transco states that also 
included in the filing are tariff sheets which update the Index of 
Daily Facility Group and Delivery Point Entitlements and Related Maps.
    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each 
of its affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11352 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## WILLIAMS MULLEN

Direct Dial: 703.760.5204 kpomfret@williamsmullen.com August 26, 2015

BY FEDEX UAS Integration Office West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 Re: Docket FAA 2015-0732, Petition forAmendmentto Exemption No. 11713 Dear Sir or Madam: Property Drone Consortium ("PDC") received FAA Exemption No. 11713 on May 29, 2015 (the "Exemption") authorizing it under Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 to operate two unmanned aircraft systems ("UAS"): the microdrones md4-1000 and the Aerialtronics Altura Zenith ATx8, for aerial data collection. By this letterwe requestto amend the Exemption as follows: 1. To add the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+; the PrecisionHawk Lancaster HawkEye Mk111; the DJI Phantom 3; the DJIInspire 1; and, the senseFiy eXom to the list of UAS PDC is permitted to operate underthe exemption; and 2. To clarify that the Exemption granted for aerial data collection includes research and testing associated with inspection of infrastructure, fixed assets and equipment. PDC will comply with all ofthe conditions and limitations imposed in the Exemption exceptthat Condition/Limitation number 1will need to be revised to include the (i) DJI Phantom 2 Vision+; (ii) PrecisionHawk Lancaster HawkEye Mk-111; (iii) the DJI Phantom 3; (iv) the DJI Inspire 1; and (v) senseFiy eXom. The list of "operating documents" will also need to be revised to includethe operating documents forthe five additional platforms. We have included copies ofthe operating documents under a separate cover letter. We request thatthese attachments be treated as confidential. Otherthan these revisions, there will be no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public safetythat were the basis forthe initial grant of exemption. Since our request will not set a precedent, and our proposed use will improve safety forworkers and reducetime and associated costs for avariety of industriesthat are importantto our nation's economy, we askthatthis request be considered on an expedited basis.

28757145 1 8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 1100 Tysons Corner, VA 22102 T703.760.5200 F703.748.0244 williamsmullen.com 

### IA Professional Corporation

## WILLIAMS MULLEN UAS Integration Office Federal Aviation Administration August 26, 2015 Page 2
Thank you foryour consideration ofthis request. Please contact me at 703.760.5204 or at kpomfret@williamsmullen.com ifyou have any questions. Sincere! ,



# ./J .· I



# .t/V**ev1~ ~omfret**  KDP/kmb Confidential Attachments Under Separate Cover

28757145_1
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3004-1 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 09:18:30 Desc:Exhibit A - Notice of Appearance Page 1 of 3Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3004-1 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 09:18:30 Desc:Exhibit A - Notice of Appearance Page 2 of 3Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3004-1 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 09:18:30 Desc:Exhibit A - Notice of Appearance Page 3 of 3
#### BEDFORD MILLS v. UNITED STATES

[75 C.Cls. 412, 77 Id. 190; 290 U.S 655]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court October 9, 1933.
§ 29.481 Tail-down landing conditions. ( a ) The rotorcraft is assumed to be in the maximum nose-up attitude allowing ground clearance by each part of the rotorcraft.
( b ) In this attitude, ground loads are assumed to act perpendicular to the ground.
§ 234.7 Voluntary reporting. ( a ) In addition to the data for each reportable flight required to be reported by this part, a reporting carrier may report to DOT for every other nonstop domestic flight that it schedules, the reportable flight data specified in this part.
( b ) Any air carrier that is not a reporting carrier may file the data specified in this part for every reportable flight that it schedules, or for every nonstop domestic flight that it schedules.
( c ) Voluntary reports containing information not required to be filed ( 1 ) must be submitted in the same form and manner, and at the same time, as reports containing data required to be filed, and
( 2 ) must be accompanied by a written statement describing in detail the information that is being voluntarily submitted. A carrier that files a voluntary report must continue to do so for a period of not less than 12 consecutive months.
#### J. R. Goodwin and Vetter Goodwin, his Wife, *Appellants,*v. Harwood Rosser and Augustus Fitch, Jr., *Appellees.*

A contract to convey land to “G. and associates” will not be specifically enforced in favor of R. & F. the assigness of G. alone, when it does not appear that R. & F. were the associates of G. or the word “associates” means assigns.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.'

*A. H. King, Boswell King*and *Van G. Swearingen,*for Appellants.

*Harwich*& *Jennings*and *Eugene Hale,*for Appellees.

Whitfield, C. J.

This suit was brought by the appellees against appellants for the specific performance of the following contract to convey real estate:

> “Rec’d of M. C. Greeley and associates, Ten ($10.00) Dollars on account purchase price of Twelve Thousand *300Dollars ($12,000.00) for Lots 1, 2, 13 and 14, Block between Cheney St. and Willow Branch Ave., % cash, % in one, two and three years. Interest 7%. Owner to have use of place until July 1st, 1912, and to charge no interest and to pay % taxes of year 1912.

> This option to be good for sixty days.

> (Signed) J. R. GOODWIN.

> (Indorsed on back)

> I hereby transfer my interest in within property *to*Harwood Rosser and Augustus Fitch, Jr.

> (Signed) MELLIN C. GREELEY.”

A demurrer to the bill of complaint was overruled, and defendants appealed.

The contract was made by J. R. Goodwin, the owner -of the land, with M. C. Greeley and associates, and it does not appear that Rosser and Fitch were the associates of Greeley, referred to in the contract. As the contract provided for time payments and was made by Goodwin ydth “M. C. Greeley and associates,” and not with M. C. Greeley and his assigns, it does not appear by the contract or by allegations that the contract contemplated that the vendor would take other than the named vendees as his debtors for time payments. No facts are alleged to indicate that the words “and associates” as used in the contract refer to “assigns,” as was found to be the intended meaning of such words in Duncan v. Beard, 2 Nott & McCord (S. C.) 400.

The complainants have not by appropriate allegations shown themselves to be entitled to the specific enforcement of a contract that was made with “M. O. Greeley and associates.” If the complainants are not Greeley’s “associates” in the contract, they are not entitled to specific performance, and if they are such “associates,” it *301is not so alleged. Greeley himself is not asking specific performance, and it does not appear that the contract contemplated a conveyance with a time consideration to any one other than “M. C. Greeley and associates;” nor does it appear what has become of the' interests of the associates.

The order overruling the demurrer to the bill of complaint is reversed.

Taylor, Shackleford, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.
#### SWISHER’S LESSEE *v.*WILLIAMS’ HEIRS.

Fraud — deed—grantor witness- — Sunday—breach of faith.

Fraud may be proven to vitiate a deed; but a mere mistake with which the grantor had no agency will have no effect.

The plaintiff’s grantor with covenant of warranty, is not a witness to sustain the title of his grantee.

The grantor is a competent witness for those claiming against his title, *to*facts independent of the deed.

A grantor of a quit claim deed is a competent witness.

That a deed was executed on Sunday, will not avail the grantor to avoid it — that botii parties violated the sabbath, is no reason why either should commit the additional sin of violating theirfaith pledged-on that day.

Ejectment. The plaintiff deduced his title under a, patent to Bogert’s heirs — a decree of the Court of Common Pleas for a portion of the land to Mackay, and a deed from Mackay to the lessor of the plaintiff. It was proven that the defendants were in possession of the land covered by the deed except eleven poles on the south ■ side, and that their deed covers the land they have in possession.

Mackay, the warrantor of the plaintiff, was called by him as a witness. The defendant objected his incompetency.

*Doane,*for the plaintiff,

called Mackay, the defendant’s grantor, and offered to prove that the deed was obtained by fraud, and falsely representing it only for the dower interest, and that the deed was executed on Sunday.

By the Court.

- The witness is called to sustain his ow,n title, and is incompetent.

The defence then offered a deed from Mackay, Swisher and wife, and others to Williams for the same land;

• By the Court. The objection that the deed was executed on Sunday will not avail you. ’Both parties partook of the sin of violating the Sabbath, and the law does not require of us to enable either party to add to the sin, by breaking the faith pledged on that day, and commit a fraud, out of assumed regard for the sabbath day. It is competent to prove the deed obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, as that makes it void: but the mere intention on the part of the grantor to make a different deed, is not such fraud, unless the *755grantor was deceived by the grantee. The grantor of this deed is a competent witness for the plaintiff, as he does not claim under it. This grantor is competent on general grounds, as his deed is only a quit claim.

Verdict for defendant.