alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8.1

Principal Sub-holding CompaniesOwnership Structure

As of March 31, 2017



LOGO



|(1) | Compañía Internacional de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V., which we refer to as CIBSA.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Percentage of issued and outstanding capital stock owned by CIBSA (63% of Coca-Cola FEMSAs capital stock with full voting rights). See Item 4.
Information on the Company  Coca-Cola FEMSA  Capital Stock.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Ownership in CB Equity held through various FEMSA subsidiaries.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Combined economic interest in Heineken N.V. and Heineken Holding N.V.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | Includes the Retail Division, the Health Division and the Fuel Division.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
230511 SCH ORD RE FOSSAS-MARXUACH ADMIN EXP MOT VERSION MAY 11, 2023 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF MOTION FOR 

ALLOWANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE PROOF OF CLAIM

The Court has received and reviewed the of Motion for Allowance of 

Administrative Expense Proof of Claim Filed on February 4, 2023 Due to Lack of Notice 

(Docket Entry No. 24183 in Case No. 17-3283) (the “Motion”), filed by Acisclo FossasMarxuach (“Movant”). 

Responsive papers to the Motion, if any, must be filed by May 24, 2023, at

5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). Movant’s reply papers, if any, must be filed by May 31, 

2023, at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). The Court will thereafter take the Motion on 

submission, unless the Court determines that a hearing is necessary.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 11, 2023

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); 

(iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings 

Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24192 Filed:05/11/23 Entered:05/11/23 11:50:35 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal C 15I/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 015I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5916 January 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 015I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5916 January 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2016/C 015I/1 | Information concerning the date of application of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1861 amending Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1862 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2016/C 015I/1

Information concerning the date of application of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1861 amending Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1862 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
November 24, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EX PARTE STACEY LOVI NGS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00425

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
No. 2--96--0797

________________________________________________________________

                                  IN THE

                        APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS

                              SECOND DISTRICT

________________________________________________________________

DELORES STANKEWITZ, JANE VAN         )  Appeal from the Circuit Court

HAMME, LaVONNE ERTMER, and           )  of Jo Daviess County.

MAXINE BUFFO,                   )

                                )

     Plaintiffs-Appellees,           )

                                     )  No. 93--CH--21

v.                                   )

                                     )

JAMES W. BOHO and MARY               )  

ELLEN BOHO,                     )  Honorable

                                     )  William A. Kelly,

     Defendants-Appellants.          )  Judge, Presiding.

________________________________________________________________

     JUSTICE DOYLE delivered the opinion of the court:

     Defendants, James and Mary Ellen Boho, appeal the circuit

court's order finding that plaintiffs, Delores Stankewitz, Jane Van

Hamme, LaVonne Ertmer, and Maxine Buffo, had obtained title by

adverse possession to approximately three acres of land of which

defendants are the legal titleholders.  Defendants' contentions can

be summarized as follows:  (1) the evidence was insufficient to

support the court's finding of adverse possession and (2)

plaintiffs failed to establish the boundaries of the disputed

parcel.

     Plaintiffs and defendants own adjacent parcels of land in

Elizabeth Township, Jo Daviess County.  Plaintiffs' parcel borders

defendants' to the east and south.  Defendants purchased their

parcel in 1993 from William Brown, who had acquired it from his

aunt and uncle, William and Gladys Mougin, in 1975.  The parcel had

been in the Brown-Mougin family since at least the mid-1800s.

     Plaintiffs acquired their parcel from their mother, Orphie

Mitchell, in 1991.  She and her late husband, Lawrence Mitchell,

purchased the tract from Alice Virtue in 1959.

     Shortly after acquiring their property, the Mitchells began

leasing the adjacent tract from the Mougins and later from Brown. 

They used both parcels to run cattle.

     When the Mitchells purchased their parcel, an irregular, or

"zig-zag," fence existed on the southeast quarter of the adjacent

Mougin-Brown property.  This fence ran roughly in a semicircle and

approxim
#### HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE v HOLMES

Case No. 91-02275-COCE-52

County Court, Broward County

June 6, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Charles W. Cherry, II., Esquire, for plaintiff.

Sharon Bourassa-Diaz, Esquire, Legal Aid Service of Broward County, Inc., for defendant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

THOMAS M. LYNCH, IV, County Judge.

*ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR STAY OF WRIT OF POSSESSION*

THIS CAUSE came before this Court upon the Defendant’s Motion for Stay of Writ of Possession, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

*195
      *FINDINGS OF FACT*

1. The Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Tenant Eviction and the Defendant filed her Answer as well as Demand for Jury Trial.

2. This cause was heard by a jury and a verdict for the Plaintiff was entered on Thursday, May 16, 1991 returning possession of the premises to the Plaintiff.

3. On May 20, 1991, four (4) days after the jury rendered its verdict, this Court signed an Order for Tenant Removal and Writ of Possession directing the Clerk to issue the writ forthwith.

4. On May 20, 1991, Defendant filed her Motion for Stay of the Writ of Possession which asserted that this Court prematurely entered the Writ of Possession in violation of Rule 1.550(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure which states that no execution or final process shall issue until the time for serving a motion for new trial has expired and if a motion for new trial is served until it is determined.

5. The Defendant argued at the hearing that under Rule 1.530(b) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, she had ten (10) days after the jury returned its verdict on May 16, 1991 to file her motion for new trial, to wit: May 28, 1991, and that the Writ of Possession, therefore, was entered prematurely on May 20, 1991.

*CONCLUSIONS OF LAW*

Based upon the foregoing, it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

1. In accordance with Rule 1.530(b) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the Defendant had ten (10) days from May 16, 1991, the date the jury verdict was returned, to request a motion for a new trial, to wit: May 28, 1991.

2. Rule 1.550(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure provides that no execution or final process shall issue until the time for serving a motion for new trial has expired and if a motion for new trial has been timely served, until it is determined.

3. The Writ of Possession issued by this Court on May 20, 1991, four (4) days after the jury returned its verdict in favor of the Plaintiff, was entered prematurely and, therefore, in violation of Rule 1.550(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

4. In accordance with Rule 1.550(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the Writ of Possession entered May 20, 1991 is hereby *196stayed until Defendant’s Motion for New Trial filed on May 28, 1991 is determined.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at Fort Lauderdale, Bro-ward County, this 6th day of June, 1991.
Summary
of Material Terms of


the
Capital Bank Annual Incentive Plan





The
Capital Bank Annual Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is a compensatory plan through
which the Company’s senior officers are eligible to receive a cash bonus for
specific achievements on behalf of the Company’s performance and their
individual achievements to align the officers’ interests with those of the
Company’s shareholders. The payments under the Plan are targeted as a percentage
of base compensation, and the opportunity for a more significant award generally
increases when the Company achieves higher levels of performance. Company
performance is measured in terms of net income, asset growth, return on equity
and functional performance objectives.





Each
executive’s cash bonus target is set by the Compensation/Human Resources
Committee of the Board of Directors at the beginning of each fiscal year. Actual
bonus payouts, if any, under the Plan will vary depending on the Company’s
actual results. In addition, the Compensation/Human Resources Committee has
retained the discretion under the Plan, in extraordinary circumstances, to award
bonuses or otherwise increase, reduce or eliminate bonuses that otherwise might
be payable to an executive officer based on actual performance even if
inconsistent with the Plan. Participants in the Plan who join the Company
mid-year will have bonuses, if any, prorated. Bonuses are intended to be paid no
later than 120 days following the close of the fiscal year.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4232 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the coverage of 

Coronavirus Relief Fund payments to Tribal Governments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2020 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. DAINES) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend 

the coverage of Coronavirus Relief Fund payments to 

Tribal Governments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COVERAGE OF CORONAVIRUS 

4 RELIEF FUND PAYMENTS TO TRIBAL GOV5 ERNMENTS. 

6 Section 601(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 801(d)(3)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(or, in the 

8 case of a Tribal government, December 30, 2022)’’ after 

9 ‘‘December 30, 2020’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS