alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Iris Oifigiúill C NaN/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2571
  doi:10.3000/17252571.CA2011.091.gla |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúill
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | C NaN |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 5423 Márta 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2571

doi:10.3000/17252571.CA2011.091.gla

Iris Oifigiúill

an Aontais Eorpaigh

C NaN

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

5423 Márta 2011

---

| | Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Ceartúchán |
| 2011/C /01 | Ceartúchán ar na fógraí comórtas COM/AD/01/10 agus COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 agus COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 agus COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 agus COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 agus COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 agus COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 agus COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 agus COM/AD/16/10 (IO C 265 A, 30.9.2010) | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

Ceartúchán

2011/C /01

Ceartúchán ar na fógraí comórtas COM/AD/01/10 agus COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 agus COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 agus COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 agus COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 agus COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 agus COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 agus COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 agus COM/AD/16/10 (IO C 265 A, 30.9.2010)

(IO C 265 A, 30.9.2010)

1

ATHBHREITHNIÚ AR IRISÍ OIFIGIÚLA C A COMÓRTAS

Anseo thíos gheobhaidh tú liosta de na heagráin C A a foilsíodh le linn na bliana reatha.

Mura gcuirtear a mhalairt in iúl, foilsítear leagan den IO i ngach teanga.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |
| 76 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 82 | |
| 91 | |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

76

(DE/EN/FR)

82

91

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Faoin tagairt C 91 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh. |

---

(1)   Faoin tagairt C 91 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh.

1

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

Ceartúchán

| 23.3.2011 | GA | Iris Oifigiúill an Aontais Eorpaigh | C NaN/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2011

GA

Iris Oifigiúill an Aontais Eorpaigh

C NaN/1

---

Ceartúchán ar na fógraí comórtas COM/AD/01/10 agus COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 agus COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 agus COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 agus COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 agus COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 agus COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 agus COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 agus COM/AD/16/10

(
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 265 A an 30 Meán Fómhair 2010
  )

(2011/C 91 A/01)

Chun tuilleadh eolais a fháil, féach leagan Béarla an cheartúcháin ar an bhFógra Comórtas Oscailte.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, David O. Cole, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the periodic report, to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC upon request.







Date:  July 19, 2010

By: /s/ David O. Cole

David O. Cole

Chief Financial Officer
§ 251.4 Large musical instruments as carry-on baggage. Each covered carrier shall permit a passenger to carry a musical instrument that is too large to meet the requirements of § 251.3 in the aircraft cabin, without charging the passenger a fee in addition to the cost of an additional ticket described in paragraph (e) of this section, if: ( a ) The instrument is contained in a case or covered so as to avoid injury to other passengers;
( b ) The weight of the instrument, including the case or covering, does not exceed 165 pounds or the applicable weight restrictions for the aircraft;
( c ) The instrument can be stowed in accordance with the requirements for carriage of carry-on baggage or cargo established by the FAA;
( d ) Neither the instrument nor the case contains any object not otherwise permitted to be carried in an aircraft cabin because of a law or regulation of the United States; and
( e ) The passenger wishing to carry the instrument in the aircraft cabin has purchased an additional seat to accommodate the instrument.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4148 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4148

To extend the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program of the 
        Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 2020

 Mr. Johnson (for himself, Mr. Peters, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Lankford, Mr. 
 Inhofe, and Mr. Carper) introduced the following bill; which was read 
           twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program of the 
        Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TERRORISM STANDARDS 
              PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 5 of the Protecting and Securing Chemical 
Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-254; 6 
U.S.C. 621 note) is amended by striking ``July 23, 2020'' and inserting 
``July 27, 2023''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 1 day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**SEC. 1308. COORDINATION OF MIGRANT EDUCATION ACTIVITIES.** (a) IMPROVEMENT OF COORDINATION -

(1) IN GENERAL - The Secretary, in consultation with the States, may make grants to, or enter into contracts with, State educational agencies, local educational agencies, institutions of higher education, and other public and private nonprofit entities to improve the interstate and intrastate coordination among such agencies' educational programs, including the establishment or improvement of programs for credit a ccrual and exchange, available to migratory students. (2) DURATION - Grants under this subsection may be awarded for not more than 5 years. (b) STUDENT RECORDS -

(1) ASSISTANCE - The Secretary shall assist States in developing effective methods for the electronic transfer of student records and in determining the number of migratory children in each State. (2) INFORMATION SYSTEM -

(A) IN GENERAL - The Secretary, in consultation with the States, shall ensure the linkage of migrant student record systems for the p urpose of electronically exchanging, among the States, health and educational information regarding all migratory students. The Secretary shall ensure such linkage occurs in a cost effective manner, utilizing systems used by the States prior to, or develop ed after, the date of enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, and shall determine the minimum data elements that each State receiving funds under this part shall collect and maintain. Such elements may include —

(i) immunization records and oth er health information; (ii) elementary and secondary academic history (including partial credit), credit accrual, and results from State assessments required under section 1111(b); (iii) other academic information essential to ensuring that migratory child ren achieve to high standards; and (iv) eligibility for services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (B) NOTICE AND COMMENT- After consulting with the States under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall publish a notice in the Federal Reg ister seeking public comment on the proposed data elements that each State receiving funds under this part shall be required to collect for purposes of electronic transfer of migratory student information and the requirements that States shall meet for imm ediate electronic access to such information. Such publication shall occur not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
#### YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. v. UNITED STATES

*[Ante,*p. 683;

293 U.S. 599]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court October 15, 1934,
Exhibit 31.1 I,
B. Grant Yarber, certify that: 1.
I have reviewed
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation;  2.
Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;  3.
Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4.
The registrants
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  b.
Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  c.
Disclosed in
this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
The registrants
other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  a.
All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and  b.
Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: October 28, 2004
        /s/ B. Grant Yarber

B. Grant Yarber
President and Chief Executive Officer  -34-
EXHIBIT 32



Section 906 Certification



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Host Marriott Corporation, the general
partner of Host Marriott, L.P., (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report of Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;

and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 3, 2006



/s/ Christopher J. NassettaChristopher J. NassettaChief Executive Officer of Host Marriott Corporation, general partner of Host Marriott, L.P./s/ W. Edward WalterW. Edward WalterChief Financial Officer of Host Marriott Corporation, general partner of Host Marriott, L.P.
#### ESSO RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAHN AND COMPANY, INC., and Chandler-Evans, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 575, Docket 74-1765.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued April 9, 1975.

Decided April 28, 1975.

Robert I. Pearlman, Linden, N. J. (Richard A. Huettner and Kenyon & Kenyon Reilly Carr & Chapin, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Roger B. McCormick, Hartford, Conn. (McCormick, Paulding & Huber and William M. Pomerantz, Pomerantz & Seser-man, Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before HAYS, GURFEIN and VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The patent involved in this case was issued to Dr. Charles W. Skarstrom for his “Method and Apparatus for Fractionating Gasseous Mixtures by Adsorption.” Skarstrom came upon his method by some clever experimenting and modification of the apparatus he was using for a similar purpose when it broke down.

Admirable as Dr. Skarstrom’s work may have been, it was done without knowledge of prior similar work of a German physicist named Kahle. We agree with Judge Blumenfeld that Kahle’s work, not cited to the Patent Office at the time of Skarstrom’s application, contains substantially all the elements of Skarstrom’s device, both individually and in combination. For that reason, Skarstrom’s patent does not satisfy the requirement of nonobviousness established by 35 U.S.C. § 103. See Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 86 S.Ct. 684, 15 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966). We therefore affirm on the thorough and well-reasoned opinion of Judge Blumen-feld reported at 379 F.Supp. 205 (D.Conn.1974).
§ 1259.103 Space authorities—regular and special. ( a ) *Acceptance of gifts:* ( 1 ) In order to carry out the provisions of the Act, the Administrator is authorized to accept conditional or unconditional gifts or donations of services, money, or property; real, personal, or mixed; tangible or intangible. This authority is delegated to the Director, NASA Space Grant Program.
( 2 ) The Administrator or designee may decline any gift or donation that the Administrator determines is not in accord with the purposes of the program. Also, conditional gifts or donations that are not in compliance with the Act or the implementing regulations shall be declined. NASA may use a reasonable amount from a gift or donation to cover any administrative costs associated with such gift or donation.
( b ) *Acceptance and use of funds from other Federal agencies:* ( 1 ) To carry out the provisions of the Act, the Administrator is authorized to accept and use funds from other Federal departments, agencies, and instrumentalities to pay for awards under this program. This authority is delegated to the Director, NASA Space Grant Program.
( 2 ) The Administrator or designee may decline any such funds when the Administrator determines acceptance would not be in accord with the purposes of the program. NASA may use a reasonable amount from transferred Federal funds to cover any administrative costs associated with such transfer.
[54 FR 19880, May 9, 1989, as amended at 82 FR 35440, July 31, 2017]
EXHIBIT 32.1





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Robert M. Budd, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the periodic report, to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC upon request.







Date:  April 9, 2007

By:/s/ Robert M. Budd

Robert M. Budd

Chief Executive Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 10884

TED RADCLIFFE , P etitioner

- Appellant

v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12

- CV

- 172

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ted Radcliffe, Texas prisoner # 707962, requests a certificate of appealability (CO A) to appeal the district court’ s dismissal, as time

- barr ed, of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition , which he filed t o challenge his disciplinary conviction for threatening to escape. Radcliffe has also filed a motion for judicial notice.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 24, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-10884 Document: 00513206167 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/24/2015No. 14

- 10884

2 “This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if n ecessary.” Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205 , 214 (2007). Radcliffe’s motion for an extension of time to file a COA motion was not “the ‘functional equivalent’” of a notice of appeal. See Bailey v. Cain , 609 F.3d 763, 765

- 67 (5th Cir. 2 010); F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 3 ( c ) (1)

. Because Radcliffe did not file a timely notice of appeal, his appeal is dismissed for lack of jur isdiction. See Bowles , 551 U.S. at 214

. COA DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED. Case: 14-10884 Document: 00513206167 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/24/2015
<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Stephen Whittington, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of House of Brussels Chocolates Inc. for the quarterly
period  ended  January  31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material
respects  the financial condition and results of operations of House of Brussels
Chocolates  Inc.


                                           By:      /s/ STEPHEN WHITTINGTON
                                                    ----------------------------

                                           Name:    STEPHEN  WHITTINGTON

                                           Title:   Chief  Executive  Officer

                                           Date:    March  14,  2003
National Park Service Shenandoah National Park U.S. Department of the Interior

01/13

Park Emergency Number (800) 732-0911

Leave No Trace Preservation through education: building awareness, appreciation, and most of all, respect for our public recreation places.

Byrds Nest 3

Shelter 

Park Information recording: (540) 999-3500 

www.nps.gov/shen

Panorama Area

Road and Trail Map

Marys Rock from Panorama upper parking area - 3.7 miles round trip 

through forest and mountain laurel (blooms in June) to an outstanding view. 

Steady climb, moderately difficult.

Marys Rock from Meadow Spring Parking - 2.8 miles round trip to an 

outstanding view, moderately difficult.

Pass Mountain - Appalachian Trail (AT) Loop - 3.4-mile circuit via AT 

north, fire road to hut, Pass Mountain Trail to AT south, back to starting 

point. Moderately easy hike through open forest, good for wildflowers and 

birding.

Note: Round trip hikes proceed to a destination and return by the same 

route. Circuit hikes begin and end at the same point without retracing steps.

You’ll find these

trail markers at all 

trailheads and 

intersections. The 

metal bands are 

stamped with 

directional and 

mileage information.

You’ll find these

trail markers at all

trailheads and

intersections. The

metal bands are

stamped with 

directional and

mileage information.
#### § 216.2 Applicability.

This part sets forth the requirements applicable to foreign air carriers for obtaining a Special Authorization from the Department with respect to any deviation from an authorized foreign air transportation route for the purpose of commingling blind sector traffic with air transportation traffic carried pursuant to a foreign air carrier permit issued by the Department. The deviation by a foreign air carrier from its authorized route for the purpose of combined carriage to or from the United States of nonrevenue or other traffic, the carriage of which does not constitute engaging in foreign air transportation, is governed by the provisions of part 375 of this chapter.

[ER-525, 33 FR 692, Jan. 19, 1968, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15926, Apr. 16, 2019]
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 13-40015 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ELOY GUADALUPE RUBALCAVA-SEGURA, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-379-1
Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal P ublic Defender appo i nted to represent E l o y Guadalupe Rubalcava-Segura has m o v e d f o r leave to w ithdraw and has f iled a brief in accordance with Anders v . C alifornia , 386 U.S. 7 38 (1967), a nd United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). R ubalcava-Segura h as n ot filed a response. We h ave reviewed counse l ’ s b r i e f a nd the r elevant p ortions of t he record reflected therein. W e concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents
no nonfrivolous issu e f o r a ppellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s m otion for U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D October 25, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 13-40015 Document: 00512420305 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013No. 13-40015

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40015 Document: 00512420305 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013