alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hearing Date and Time: June 6, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. (AST) 

Objection Deadline: May 22, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (AST) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, 

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al., 

Debtors. 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17-bk-3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

NOTICE OF HEARING ON FIRST INTERIM APPLICATION OF 

CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. FOR ALLOWANCE OF COMPENSATION 

AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES INCURRED AS INVESTMENT BANKER 

AND FINANCIAL ADVISOR TO FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 

BOARD, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DEBTORS 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Laura Taylor 

Swain in Room 3 of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, Federal 

Building, Office 150, 150 Carlos Chardón Street, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918-1767, on June 6, 

2018 at 9:30 a.m. (AST), or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, to consider the First 

Interim Application of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. for Allowance of Compensation and 

Reimbursement of Expenses Incurred as Investment Banker and Financial Advisor to Financial 

Oversight and Management Board, as Representative of the Debtors, from January 2017-

January 2018, filed April 23, 2018 [ECF NO. 2944], which application seeks interim allowance 

of $625,000 in compensation for services rendered and reimbursement of expenses in the amount 

of $60,971.21 ($685,971.21 total). 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that objections to the application, if any, must be 

in writing, and filed with the Court and served on applicant’s undersigned counsel so as to be 

received by May 22, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (AST). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2990 Filed:05/02/18 Entered:05/02/18 10:31:06 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Dated: May 2, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Mike Leffler 

Mike Leffler 

Director 

Citigroup Global Markets Inc. 

/s/ Jeffrey Chubak 

Jeffrey Chubak 

STORCH AMINI PC 

140 East 45th Street, 25th Floor 

New York, New York 10017 

(212) 490-4100 

jchubak@storchamini.com 

Attorneys for Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2990 Filed:05/02/18 Entered:05/02/18 10:31:06 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 29.1309 Equipment, systems, and installations. The equipment, systems, and installations whose functioning is required by this subchapter must be designed and installed to ensure that they perform their intended functions under any foreseeable operating condition. For any item of equipment or system whose failure has not been specifically addressed by another requirement in this chapter, the following requirements also apply: ( a ) The design of each item of equipment, system, and installation must be analyzed separately and in relation to other rotorcraft systems and installations to determine and identify any failure that would affect the capability of the rotorcraft or the ability of the crew to perform their duties in all operating conditions.
( b ) Each item of equipment, system, and installation must be designed and installed so that: ( 1 ) The occurrence of any catastrophic failure condition is extremely improbable;
( 2 ) The occurrence of any major failure condition is no more than improbable; and
( 3 ) For the occurrence of any other failure condition in between major and catastrophic, the probability of the failure condition must be inversely proportional to its consequences.
( c ) A means to alert the crew in the event of a failure must be provided when an unsafe system operating condition exists and to enable them to take corrective action. Systems, controls, and associated monitoring and crew alerting means must be designed to minimize crew errors that could create additional hazards.
( d ) Compliance with the requirements of this section must be shown by analysis and, where necessary, by ground, flight, or simulator tests. The analysis must account for: ( 1 ) Possible modes of failure, including malfunctions and misleading data and input from external sources;
( 2 ) The effect of multiple failures and latent failures;
( 3 ) The resulting effects on the rotorcraft and occupants, considering the stage of flight and operating conditions; and
( 4 ) The crew alerting cues and the corrective action required.
[Amdt. 29-59, 88 FR 8739, Feb. 10, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3681 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3681

   To provide an exemption from certain requirements under the Gramm-
                           Leach-Bliley Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2003

 Mr. Kennedy of Minnesota (for himself and Mr. Peterson of Minnesota) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide an exemption from certain requirements under the Gramm-
                           Leach-Bliley Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Privacy Protection Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION.

    Section 509(3) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6809(3)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(E) Certain financial institutions.--
                Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the term `financial 
                institution' does not include any provider of financial 
                services, or any affiliate thereof, that is subject to 
                regulation of client confidentiality that prohibits 
                unauthorized disclosure of confidential client 
                information without the consent of the client in the 
                form of laws, rules, or regulation of professional 
                conduct or ethics promulgated either by the court of 
                highest appellate authority or by the principal 
                legislative body or regulatory agency or body of any 
                State of the United States, the District of Columbia, 
                any territory of the United States, Puerto Rico, Guam, 
                American Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific 
                Islands, the Virgin Islands, or the Northern Mariana 
                Islands, or by the laws of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 291.24 Waiver of Department Economic Regulations.

Except for this part and those parts of the Department's Economic Regulations (parts 200 through 299 of this title) specifically referred to in this part, carriers providing cargo operations in interstate air transportation are, with respect to that transportation, relieved from all obligations imposed on air carriers by those economic regulations. Flights operated entirely within interstate air transportation shall be free from those obligations, even though they may also carry shipments to or from points outside that geographic area. This waiver shall not apply to the requirements of part 239 of this title.

[ER-1080, 43 FR 53635, Nov. 16, 1978, as amended by Doc. No. 47582, 57 FR 38770, Aug. 27, 1992; 60 FR 43526, Aug. 22, 1995]
§ 25.239 Spray characteristics, control, and stability on water. ( a ) For seaplanes and amphibians, during takeoff, taxiing, and landing, and in the conditions set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, there may be no— ( 1 ) Spray characteristics that would impair the pilot's view, cause damage, or result in the taking in of an undue quantity of water;
( 2 ) Dangerously uncontrollable porpoising, bounding, or swinging tendency; or
( 3 ) Immersion of auxiliary floats or sponsons, wing tips, propeller blades, or other parts not designed to withstand the resulting water loads.
( b ) Compliance with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section must be shown— ( 1 ) In water conditions, from smooth to the most adverse condition established in accordance with § 25.231;
( 2 ) In wind and cross-wind velocities, water currents, and associated waves and swells that may reasonably be expected in operation on water;
( 3 ) At speeds that may reasonably be expected in operation on water;
( 4 ) With sudden failure of the critical engine at any time while on water; and
( 5 ) At each weight and center of gravity position, relevant to each operating condition, within the range of loading conditions for which certification is requested.
( c ) In the water conditions of paragraph (b) of this section, and in the corresponding wind conditions, the seaplane or amphibian must be able to drift for five minutes with engines inoperative, aided, if necessary, by a sea anchor.
§ 25.1501 General. ( a ) Each operating limitation specified in §§ 25.1503 through 25.1533 and other limitations and information necessary for safe operation must be established.
( b ) The operating limitations and other information necessary for safe operation must be made available to the crewmembers as prescribed in §§ 25.1541 through 25.1587.
[Amdt. 25-42, 43 FR 2323, Jan. 16, 1978]
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00681-CV

CUERO RETAIL PARTNERSHIP, LTD.

v.

DEWITT COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT

On Appeal from the

135th District Court of De Witt County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 18-10-24,686

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 28, 2019
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Dec. 04, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-11909

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-00139-CR-J-34JRK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ADAN GONZALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(December 4, 2009)

Before BLACK, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

W. Charles Fletcher, appointed appellate counsel for Adan Gonzales, has
filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief

prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit is correct. Because independent examination of

the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw

is GRANTED, and Gonzales’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3813 

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 

to reauthorize the Ohio & Erie National Heritage Canalway, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2020 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to reauthorize the Ohio & Erie National Heritage Canalway, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF OHIO & ERIE NATIONAL 

4 HERITAGE CANALWAY. 

5 Division II of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 

6 Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333; 110 Stat. 

7 4274; 122 Stat. 824; 122 Stat. 826; 127 Stat. 3801; 127 

8 Stat. 420; 128 Stat. 314; 133 Stat. 778) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3813 IS

1 (1) in section 809, by striking ‘‘2021’’ and in2 serting ‘‘2036’’; and 

3 (2) in section 810(a), by striking 

4 ‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$30,000,000’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3796 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3796

 To withhold funding authorized under the CARES Act from any State or 
municipality that provides economic stimulus payments through a program 
             designed to exclusively assist illegal aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2020

  Mr. Cotton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To withhold funding authorized under the CARES Act from any State or 
municipality that provides economic stimulus payments through a program 
             designed to exclusively assist illegal aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Bailouts for Illegal Aliens 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS TO OFFSET STIMULUS CHECKS TO 
              ILLEGAL ALIENS.

    (a) In General.--Title XIII of the Emergency Appropriations for 
Coronavirus Health Response and Agency Operations (division B of Public 
Law 116-136) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating section 23008 as section 23009; and
            (2) by inserting after section 23007 the following:
    ``Sec. 23008.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act or 
any amendment made by this Act, no funds made available under this Act 
or by any amendment made by this Act, may be made available to a State 
or municipality (as such terms are defined in section 4002 of division 
A) unless the State or municipality has certified that it is not 
providing relief funds or similar monetary payments of any kind that 
are targeted exclusively to individuals who are believed to be 
unlawfully present in the United States.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a)(2) shall 
apply to any funds made available under the CARES Act (Public Law 116-
136) on or after the date of the enactment of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending October 31, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Gary Pokrassa, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:





(1)    The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





December
      10, 2009
              /s/Gary PokrassaGary
      Pokrassa,Chief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 26115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11336]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 87 / Thursday, May 4, 2000 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 26115]]


                Executive Order 13152 of May 2, 2000

                
Further Amendment to Executive Order 11478, Equal 
                Employment Opportunity in Federal Government

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, and in 
                order to provide for a uniform policy for the Federal 
                Government to prohibit discrimination based on an 
                individual's status as a parent, it is hereby ordered 
                that Executive Order 11478, as amended, is further 
                amended as follows:

                Section 1. Amend the first sentence of section 1 by 
                substituting ``sexual orientation, or status as a 
                parent.'' for ``or sexual orientation.''

                Sec. 2. Insert the following new sections 6 and 7 after 
                section 5:

                    ``Sec. 6. `Status as a parent' refers to the status 
                of an individual who, with respect to an individual who 
                is under the age of 18 or who is 18 or older but is 
                incapable of self-care because of a physical or mental 
                disability, is:

(a)

a biological parent;

(b)

an adoptive parent;

(c)

a foster parent;

(d)

a stepparent;

(e)

a custodian of a legal ward;

(f)

in loco parentis over such an individual; or

(g)

actively seeking legal custody or adoption of such an individual.

                    ``Sec. 7. The Office of Personnel Management shall 
                be authorized to develop guidance on the provisions of 
                this order prohibiting discrimination on the basis of 
                an individual's sexual orientation or status as a 
                parent.''

                Sec. 3. Amend section 4 by substituting ``and 
                appropriate to carry out its responsibilities under 
                this Order.'' for ``appropriate to carry out this 
                Order.''

                Sec. 4. Renumber current sections 6, 7, and 8 as 
                sections 8, 9, and 10, respectively.

                Sec. 5. Add a section 11 to read as follows:

                    ``Sec. 11. This Executive Order does not confer any 
                right or benefit enforceable in law or equity against 
                the United States or its representatives.''

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    May 2, 2000.

[FR Doc. 00-11336
Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-24 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc:

Appendix Summons Ana J. Matos Santos Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3454-24 Filed:07/09/18 Entered:07/09/18 14:08:37 Desc:

Appendix Summons Ana J. Matos Santos Page 2 of 2
89–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–1025

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 128, MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001

DECEMBER 7, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 669]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 669, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration in the House of House

Joint Resolution 128, making further continuing appropriations for

fiscal year 2001, under a closed rule. The rule waives all points of

order against consideration of the joint resolution. The rule also

provides one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6091

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STEPHEN L. SAWYER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-297, CA-96-866-A)

Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 2, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen L. Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Dean Kromberg, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen L. Sawyer seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Sawyer, Nos. CR-94-

297; CA-96-866-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.93 Concurrences or powers of attorney not previously filed to accompany tariff transmittal.

When a tariff is filed on behalf of a carrier participating therein under authority of its concurrence or power of attorney, such concurrence or power of attorney shall, if not previously filed with the Department, be transmitted at the same time such tariff is submitted for filing.
§ 23.2005 Certification of normal category airplanes. ( a ) Certification in the normal category applies to airplanes with a passenger-seating configuration of 19 or less and a maximum certificated takeoff weight of 19,000 pounds or less.
( b ) Airplane certification levels are: ( 1 ) Level 1—for airplanes with a maximum seating configuration of 0 to 1 passengers.
( 2 ) Level 2—for airplanes with a maximum seating configuration of 2 to 6 passengers.
( 3 ) Level 3—for airplanes with a maximum seating configuration of 7 to 9 passengers.
( 4 ) Level 4—for airplanes with a maximum seating configuration of 10 to 19 passengers.
( c ) Airplane performance levels are: ( 1 ) Low speed—for airplanes with a VNO and VMO ≤ 250 Knots Calibrated Airspeed (KCAS) and a MMO ≤ 0.6.
( 2 ) High speed—for airplanes with a VNO or VMO > 250 KCAS or a MMO > 0.6.
( d ) Airplanes not certified for aerobatics may be used to perform any maneuver incident to normal flying, including— ( 1 ) Stalls (except whip stalls); and
( 2 ) Lazy eights, chandelles, and steep turns, in which the angle of bank is not more than 60 degrees.
( e ) Airplanes certified for aerobatics may be used to perform maneuvers without limitations, other than those limitations established under subpart G of this part.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report), I, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (a) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (a) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Frank Lamanna      
|Frank Lamanna          
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 29, 2005