alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,886
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (675)
<INVENTORY>                                    120,261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,861
<PP&E>                                         370,563
<DEPRECIATION>                               (101,521)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 664,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,111
<BONDS>                                        300,655
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   664,717
<SALES>                                        804,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               804,574
<CGS>                                          685,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  756,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,586
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   103
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,488
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,410)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-30264

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PHIL HENDERSON, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-269

- - - - - - - - - -

August 20, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Phil Henderson, Sr., has appealed his convictions of drugtrafficking offenses. Contrary to his contentions, (1) the

evidence amply supports the jury's verdict, see United States v.

Inocencio, 40 F.3d 716, 724-26 (5th Cir. 1994); (2) the district

court did not abuse its discretion by admitting Fed. R. Evid.

404(b) evidence, see United States v. Elwood, 999 F.2d 814, 815-

17 (5th Cir. 1993); and (3) Henderson has abandoned other
No. 95-30264

- 2 -

possible issues by failing to brief them. See United States v.

Gipson, 46 F.3d 472, 474-75 (5th Cir. 1995).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Proposed Site*** October 2010 

HORTON IRON AND METAL Wilmington, North Carolina 

New Hanover County 

 Site Location:

The Horton Iron and Metal property occupies a total of 38 acres and is currently operated as a metal recycling facility. The 

east border of the site is the Northeast Cape Fear River. The area intended for NPL listing is the portion of the Horton 

property which was historically operated as a phosphate fertilizer manufacturing facility, along with sediments in two boat 

slips located on the Cape Fear River.

 Site History:

From 1911 to 1949, American Agricultural Chemical Company operated a phosphate fertilizer manufacturer with a leadacid chamber fertilizer plant. Naco Fertilizer Company continued the fertilizer operations from 1949 to 1954. During the 

1960s and 1970s, Horton conducted ship-breaking operations and metal salvage of World War II Liberty Ships in the two 

boat slips. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

Because of fertilizer manufacturing operations, the soil, ground water, and boat slip sediments are contaminated with high 

levels of arsenic and lead. As a result of ship-breaking operations, petroleum products, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons 

(PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), heavy metals, and asbestos have been detected in soil and slip sediments. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

The Cape Fear River is a commercial and recreational fishery and is also home to two federally endangered species. PCBs, 

lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury in boat-slip sediments are above EPA ecological sediment screening values. Ground

water is contaminated with lead and arsenic above EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Act Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs)

and poses a threat of discharge to the river.

 

 Response Activities (to date):

Several investigations have been conducted by EPA at the site.

 Need for NPL Listing:

The State of North Carolina referred the site to EPA because of the extent of soil contamination and the contamination in

the Cape Fear River. EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change 

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these 

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet 

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10523]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6586-2]


Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board, Meeting Dates and Agenda

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-
463, as amended (5 U.S.C., App 2) notification is hereby given of an 
open meeting of the Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board (ELAB).

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 11, 2000, from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 
p.m. (EST).

ADDRESSES: While the meeting will be conducted by teleconference, the 
public is invited to participate in the teleconference by contacting 
Jeanne Hankins.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board will discuss the work being 
conducted by its subcommittees and any new issues that may be brought 
to the Board's attention.
    The meeting is open to the public and time will be allotted for 
public comment. Written comments are encouraged and should be directed 
to David Friedman; USEPA; 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (8101R); 
Washington, DC 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Friedman; Designated Federal 
Officer; USEPA; 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (8101R); Washington, DC 
20460. If questions arise, please contact Mr. Friedman by phone at 
(202) 564-6662, by facsimile at (202) 565-2432 or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98feeaf1fdfcf5f9f6b6fcf9eef1fcd8fde8f9b6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2d4c0dbd7d6dfd3dc9cd6d3c4dbd6f2d7c2d39cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons desiring to participate, by telephone, 
in this meeting, should call Jeanne Hankins at 919-541-1120.

    Dated: April 20, 2000.
Peter Durant,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Management, Office of 
Research and Development.
[FR Doc. 00-10523 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation (the “Company”) for the period endedMarch 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B. Grant Yarber,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
 
 The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/B. Grant
      Yarber
 B. Grant Yarber
 President and Chief Executive
Officer
 May 8, 2008
 
 This Certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.
 
 A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EE-RM-97-500 COMMENT 68AA
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EE-RM-97-500 COMMENT 68AA
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EE-RM-97-500 COMMENT 68AA
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EE-RM-97-500 COMMENT 68AA
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EE-RM-97-500 COMMENT 68AA
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William R.
Lampley, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ William R, Lampley
---------------------------------
William R, Lampley
Interim Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2005

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed  "filed" by the Company for  purposes of Section
18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  as  amended,  and  shall  not be
incorporated  by reference  into any filing of the Company under the  Securities
Act of 1933,  as amended,  or the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether  made  before  or after  the date of this  Report,  irrespective  of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request


                                      -41-
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50006 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE LUIS DE LA CRUZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-01-CR-305-1-FB

-------------------- June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Luis De La Cruz-Hernandez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. De La Cruz-Hernandez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. De La CruzHernandez maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment whichNo. 02-50006 -2- charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. De La Cruz-Hernandez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# DATE & TIME:

Tuesday, May 9, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the Public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. 

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# DATE & TIME:

Thursday, May 11, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

The meeting will be open to the Public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-05: The Oneida Nation of New York by counsel, Markham C. Erickson. (continued from April 27, 2000).

Final Rules and Explanation and Justification for the Administrative Fine Program

Administrative Matters.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-11247 Filed 5-2-00; 11:57 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
EXHIBIT 1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3866-1 Filed:09/05/18 Entered:09/05/18 20:05:51 Desc:

Exhibit 1 Page 1 of 3
PO Box 192018 San Juan, PR 00919-2018; www.oversightboard.pr.gov; comments@oversightboard.pr.gov

Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico

PRESS RELEASE

For Immediate Release

OVERSIGHT BOARD ESTABLISHES SPECIAL CLAIMS COMMITTEE TO PURSUE 

FINDINGS OF DEBT INVESTIGATION REPORT

(San Juan, PR – August 29, 2018) – The Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto 

Rico (the “Oversight Board” or the “Board”), created by Congress under the bipartisan Puerto 

Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”), today announced 

that it has designated, through Unanimous Written Consent, a Special Claims Committee to 

pursue claims resulting from the results of the independent investigation conducted by 

Kobre & Kim into Puerto Rico’s debt and its connection to the current fiscal crisis.

Under PROMESA, the Oversight Board, as the representative of the Commonwealth and 

instrumentalities in Title III may pursue claims on behalf of the Title III debtors for the 

benefit of all creditors and parties in interest in the Title III cases. The Special Claims 

Committee will review the Debt Investigation Report and determine the scope of any further 

action to negotiate or pursue claims. The Oversight Board appoints Board members Andrew 

G. Biggs, Arthur J. González, Ana J. Matosantos and David A. Skeel, Jr. as the members of the

Special Claims Committee.

As previously announced, the Oversight Board’s Special Investigation Committee will 

conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, September 18, 2018, in Puerto Rico, to give interested 

parties an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the results of the Report.

###

Contact:

Forculus Strategic Communications

José Luis Cedeño 

787-400-9245 

jcedeno@forculuspr.com

info@forculuspr.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3866-1 Filed:09/05/18 Entered:09/05/18 20:05:51 Desc:

Exhibit 1 Page 2 of 3
PO Box 192018 San Juan, PR 00919-2018; www.oversightboard.pr.gov; comments@oversightboard.pr.gov

Contact (Mainland):

APCO Worldwide

Gabriella Zen

202-778-1056

gzen@apcoworldwide.com

Board’s Contact Information:

E-mail: comments@oversightboard.pr.gov

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3866-1 Filed:09/05/18 Entered:09/05/18 20:05:51 Desc:

Exhibit 1 Page 3 of 3
#### ROCHESTER & PITTSBURGH COAL & IRON CO. *v.*UNITED STATES

[78 C.Cls. 231; 291 U.S. 675]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court March 5, 1934.
#### § 25.904 Automatic takeoff thrust control system (ATTCS).

Each applicant seeking approval for installation of an engine power control system that automatically resets the power or thrust on the operating engine(s) when any engine fails during the takeoff must comply with the requirements of appendix I of this part.

[Amdt. 25-62, 52 FR 43156, Nov. 9, 1987]
NUMBER 13-21-00438-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

IN THE INTEREST OF T.C. AND K.C., CHILDREN

 

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces County, Texas.

 

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This is an appeal of a final order terminating parental rights. Appellee has filed a 

first motion of extension fo time to file a brief. Appellee’s brief was due on April 14, 2022. 

Appellee has requested a twenty-day (20) extension to file a brief.

Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the 

rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals but include additional expedited 

deadlines and procedures. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4; TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). The 
2

intermediate appellate courts are directed to ensure “as far as reasonably possible” that 

these appeals are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of 

appeal is filed. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). Given the nature of these cases and the

shortened appellate deadlines, we limit the request to one five-day extension of time 

absent truly extraordinary circumstances. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d).

This Court, having fully examined and considered appellee’s motion is of the 

opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellee’s first motion for extension of time to file 

his brief should be granted in part with order. The Court, however, requires strict 

adherence to the briefing rules in appeals of parental termination cases, such as this 

appeal, and looks with disfavor upon the delay caused by such extension requests. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6; see also id. at R. 28.4.

The Court GRANTS in part appellee’s first motion for extension of time. This 

motion is GRANTED insofar as the Court will extend appellee’s deadline to file its brief to

5:00 o’clock p.m. on Monday, April 25, 2022. The Court DENIES appellee’s request for a 

twenty-day (20) extension. Further motions for extension of time will not be favorably 

entertained by this Court, absent extraordinary circumstances.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

20th day of April, 2022.
#### § 25.1403 Wing icing detection lights.

Unless operations at night in known or forecast icing conditions are prohibited by an operating limitation, a means must be provided for illuminating or otherwise determining the formation of ice on the parts of the wings that are critical from the standpoint of ice accumulation. Any illumination that is used must be of a type that will not cause glare or reflection that would handicap crewmembers in the performance of their duties.

[Amdt. 25-38, 41 FR 55468, Dec. 20, 1976]