alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             256
<SECURITIES>                                     4,152
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,408
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,391
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           525
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,870
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,963)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.014)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.014)


</TABLE>
```

                                  CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in his
capacity as an officer of Sporting  Magic,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  that, to his
knowledge,  the  Quarterly  Report of the  Company on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended August 31, 2002,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in such
report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operation of the Company.

Date: October 15, 2002                     By: /s/ Dan Cooke
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Dan Cooke
                                               Chief Executive Officer

Date: October 15, 2002                     By: /s/ Charles Thompson
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Charles Thompson
                                               Chief Financial Officer and
                                               Principal Accounting Officer
```
§ 29.663 Ground resonance prevention means. ( a ) The reliability of the means for preventing ground resonance must be shown either by analysis and tests, or reliable service experience, or by showing through analysis or tests that malfunction or failure of a single means will not cause ground resonance.
( b ) The probable range of variations, during service, of the damping action of the ground resonance prevention means must be established and must be investigated during the test required by § 29.241.
[Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 8003, Mar. 6, 1990]
Exhibit 10.4.2

                  AMENDMENT No 1 TO CONTRACT Number GSS0210100
                           (Digital Channel Platform)

            This  Amendment (the  "Amendment")  is made as of the 7th day of May
2004 ("Effective Date").

      WHEREAS, Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. and Loral SpaceCom Corporation,
d/b/a  Loral  Skynet  ("Loral")  executed  an  agreement  for the  creation  and
marketing to potential  customers,  a multi-channel video and audio transmission
service,  including video compression,  uplink, and satellite capacity effective
as of 4 February 2003 (the "Agreement");

      WHEREAS,  Intelsat LLC, a company organized and existing under the laws of
Delaware,  acquired  the  assets  of Loral  effective  17 March  2004,  and,  in
connection  with that  acquisition,  the  Agreement was assigned to Intelsat USA
Sales Corp.  ("Intelsat"),  a company also organized and existing under the laws
of Delaware  effective on the same date,  and CUSTOMER has validly  consented to
said assignment;

      WHEREAS Telstar 7 has been renamed Intelsat Americas 7 (IA-7);

      WHEREAS  Section 11.1 of the Agreement  provides that the Initial Term (as
defined in the Agreement)  shall continue for a period of five (5) years,  until
February 3, 2008, and CUSTOMER and Intelsat now desire to extend such term;

      NOW THEREFORE,  in  consideration of the promises herein exchanged and for
other good and valuable  consideration  the receipt and  sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged,  the Parties agree to amend the Terms and Conditions to the
Agreement as described below:

A.    All terms not otherwise  defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to
      them in the Agreement.

B.    All references to Skynet are replaced with  "Intelsat," and all references
      to Telstar 7 are replaced with IA-7.

C.    The  Initial  Term of  service  under  Section  11.1 of the  Agreement  is
      extended until 31 January 2013.

D.    Section 7(ii) of the Agreement is deleted and replaced with:

      If to Intelsat:  Director, Contracts
                       Intelsat
                       3400 International Drive NW
                       Washington, D.C. 20008
                       Tel: 202 944 7200

      With a copy to:  General Counsel

<PAGE>

            Except as herein  amended,  all other  provisions  of the  Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.  In the event of any conflict between the
terms of this Amendment and those of the Agreement,  the terms of this Amendment
shall  supersede  those of the  Agreement and  exclusively  govern the matter in
question.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed or caused to be
executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date first written above.

INTELSAT USA SALES CORP.

BY: /s/ Stephen Spengler
    -----------------------------------
        Stephen Spengler
        Director and President


PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.

BY: /s/ Alexandra Atkins Shepard
    -----------------------------------
        Alexandra Atkins Shepard
        Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OMI Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig H. Stevenson, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ¦ 1350, as adopted pursuant to ¦ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|Date: | March 15, 2005 | By: | /s/ Craig H. Stevenson, Jr.
|----- | -------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|      |                |     |                            
|      |                |     | Craig H. Stevenson, Jr.    
|      |                |     | Chairman of the Board and  
|      |                |     | Chief Executive Officer    









A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OMI Corporation and will be retained by OMI Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.



---
#### § 254.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish rules for the carriage of baggage in interstate and intrastate air transportation. The part sets permissible limitations of air carrier liability for loss, damage, or delay in the carriage of passenger baggage and requires air carriers to provide certain types of notice to passengers.

[ER-1374, 49 FR 5071, Feb. 10, 1984, as amended at 64 FR 70575, Dec. 17, 1999]
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/02 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Annual Report of CEPHAS HOLDING Corp, on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Klamka, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) Such Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of CEPHAS HOLDING Corp.  April 19, 2012By:/s/ Peter KlamkaPeter KlamkaChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1340

CHARMAINE L. ANDERSON,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GREGORY JACKO, Commissioner, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (8:11-cv-01370-JFM)

Submitted: July 19, 2013 Decided: August 6, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charmaine L. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ronald Baldwin, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charmaine L. Anderson appeals from the district 

court’s orders dismissing her employment discrimination 

complaint, denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion for 

reconsideration, and denying her subsequent motion to alter or 

amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Jacko, No. 

8-11-cv-01370-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 11, 2013). In addition, we note 

that Anderson has waived certain claims by failing to raise them 

in her informal brief, see Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., 

Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir. 2009), and has waived other 

claims by raising them for the first time on appeal. See

Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.223 Class II provisional airworthiness certificates. ( a ) Except as provided in § 21.225, an applicant is entitled to a Class II provisional airworthiness certificate for an aircraft for which a Class II provisional type certificate has been issued if— ( 1 ) He meets the eligibility requirements of § 21.213 and he complies with this section; and
( 2 ) The FAA finds that there is no feature, characteristic, or condition of the aircraft that would make the aircraft unsafe when operated in accordance with the limitations established in §§ 21.83(h), 91.317, and 121.207 of this chapter.
( b ) The applicant must show that a Class II provisional type certificate for the aircraft has been issued to the manufacturer.
( c ) The applicant must submit a statement by the manufacturer that the aircraft has been manufactured under a quality system adequate to ensure that the aircraft conforms to the type design corresponding with the provisional type certificate.
( d ) The applicant must submit a statement that the aircraft has been found by him to be in a safe operating condition under the applicable limitations.
( e ) The aircraft must be flown at least five hours by the manufacturer.
( f ) The aircraft must be supplied with a provisional aircraft flight manual containing the limitations established by §§ 21.83(h), 91.317, and 121.207 of this chapter.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14571, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-12, 31 FR 13389, Oct. 15, 1966; Amdt. 21-66, 54 FR 34329, Aug. 18, 1989; Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53390, Oct. 16, 2009]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4094 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4094

 To prohibit the procurement by the Director of the Defense Logistics 
   Agency of certain items containing a perfluoroalkyl substance or 
                       polyfluoroalkyl substance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2020

Mr. Blumenthal (for himself and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the procurement by the Director of the Defense Logistics 
   Agency of certain items containing a perfluoroalkyl substance or 
                       polyfluoroalkyl substance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``PFAS Free Military Purchasing Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON PROCUREMENT BY DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY OF 
              CERTAIN ITEMS CONTAINING PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES AND 
              POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES.

    (a) Prohibition.--The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency may 
not procure any covered item containing a perfluoroalkyl substance or 
polyfluoroalkyl substance.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Covered item.--The term ``covered item'' means--
                    (A) non-stick cookware or food service ware for use 
                in galleys or dining facilities;
                    (B) food packaging materials;
                    (C) furniture or floor waxes;
                    (D) carpeting, rugs, or upholstered furniture;
                    (E) personal care items;
                    (F) dental floss; and
                    (G) sunscreen.
            (2) Perfluoroalkyl substance.--The term ``perfluoroalkyl 
        substance'' means a man-made chemical of which all of the 
        carbon atoms are fully fluorinated carbon atoms.
            (3) Polyfluoroalkyl substance.--The term ``polyfluoroalkyl 
        substance'' means a man-made chemical containing a mix of fully 
        fluorinated carbon atoms, partially fluorinated carbon atoms, 
        and nonfluorinated carbon atoms.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the date 
that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:29 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:36:01 Desc: MainDocument Page 1 of 3Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:29 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:36:01 Desc: MainDocument Page 2 of 3Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:29 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:36:01 Desc: MainDocument Page 3 of 3
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. KID AMOS, Appellant.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

April 2, 1912.

1. CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS: Appellate Practice: Failure to Prosecute Appeal. Where the defendant in a criminal case appeals from a judgment of conviction, and fails to file a transcript of the proceedings or a certified copy of the judgment and order granting the appeal, within the time prescribed hy law, the appeal will be docketed and dismissed for failure to prosecute it, upon a transcript being filed hy the state.

2, -¡ Appellate Jurisdiction: Indictment for Felony and Conviction of Misdemeanor. Where, in a criminal prosecution, the defendant is indicted for a felony but is convicted of a misdemeanor, the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction of the appeal.

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *George H. Shields,*Judge.

Appeal dismissed.

*John A. Gernes*for appellant.

*Seebert G. Jones,*Circuit Attorney, and *Forrest G. Ferriss,*Assistant Circuit Attorney, for respondent.

REYNOLDS, P. J.

One Kid Amos was proceeded against on information of-the circuit attorney of the city of St. Louis and in the circuit court of that city for a felonious assault, as it is charged, in that he feloniously, etc., shot at one McTigue with a loaded pistol with intent, feloniously, etc., to kill. On a trial he was found guilty of a common assault and his punishment fixed at imprisonment for six months in the city jail. From this sentence and judgment the defendant prayed an appeal to this court and, the appeal being allowed, filed a recognizance in the sum of *214$500 with surety, conditioned that the defendant appear at the next term of this court and abide the judgment of that court. This was on the 29th of July, 1909. It appears by the transcript, which has been filed in this court by the circuit attorney of the city of St. Louis, that no bill of exceptions had ever been filed nor was a certified copy of the judgment or sentence and of the order allowing the appeal ever filed in this court. Piling a certified transcript showing these facts, the circuit attorney of the city of St. Louis now moves the court to dismiss the appeal or make such other order in the premises as may be just and proper.

Our Supreme Court in State v. Greenspan, 137 Mo. 149, 38 S. W. 582, has held that where the defendant is convicted of a felony under an indictment charging him with such an offense, the fact that a less punishment is imposed does not reduce the offense to a misdemeanor and in such case the Supreme Court has jurisdiction, but where the conviction is for a misdemeanor it has none. Applying this to the case before us, the conviction here was for a misdemeanor, over an appeal in which this court has jurisdiction. The case will be docketed forthwith, and for failure of the defendant to prosecute the appeal, it is dismissed.

*Nortoni*and *Caulfield, JJ.,*concur.
Exhibit
10.3


 


FORM OF
DIRECTOR AND OFFICER LOCK-UP AGREEMENT


 


April
21, 2003


DepoMed, Inc.


1060 O’Brien Drive


Menlo Park, CA 
94025


 


To the Purchasers listed on Exhibit A

to the DepoMed, Inc. Securities Purchase Agreement 

dated as of April 21, 2003


 


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to that certain
Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), dated as of April 21,
2003, by and among DepoMed, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), and the
purchasers (the “Purchasers”)
identified in Exhibit A thereto. 
Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Purchase Agreement.


 


As an inducement to the
Purchasers to purchase the Securities, the undersigned hereby covenants and
agrees that, during the period beginning on the date hereof and ending on the
date that the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC, the
undersigned shall not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise
dispose of, directly or indirectly, any securities of the Company (“Company
Securities”), enter into a transaction which would have the same effect, or
enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in
part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of any Company Securities,
whether any such aforementioned transaction is to be settled by delivery of the
Company Securities or such other securities, in cash or otherwise, or publicly
disclose the intention to make any such offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or
to enter into any such transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement.


 


This Agreement shall be binding
on the undersigned and the successors, heirs, personal representatives and
assigns of the undersigned.  This
Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of New York, without regard to its conflicts or choice of law principles.


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                        ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This Addendum to Employment Agreement (the "Addendum"), made this 3rd day
of March, 2003, by and between RMH Teleservices, Inc. (the "Company" or "RMH")
and John A. Fellows (the "Executive").

                               W I T N E S S E T H

     WHEREAS, RMH and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated
October 1, 2000, and executed by Executive on October, 2000 ("Employment
Agreement") governing the terms and conditions of RMH's employment arrangement
with Executive;

     WHEREAS, RMH and Executive both agree that the Employment Agreement will be
modified as described below;

     WHEREAS, RMH and Executive both agree that the modification discussed in
Paragraph 1 below will be effective retroactively to October 1, 2002;

     WHEREAS, both parties agree that no other modifications are being made to
the Employment Agreement; and

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts, mutual promises and covenants
contained herein, RMH and Executive, intending to be legally bound, agree as
follows:

     1.   Paragraph 5(b) of the Employment Agreement, regarding an Annual Bonus,
is deleted in full and replaced with the following:

                    Effective retroactively to October 1,
                    2002, Executive shall not be guaranteed
                    an Annual Bonus, but instead shall be
                    eligible for an Annual Bonus, if any, in
                    accordance with the terms, conditions
                    and restrictions of the Management Bonus
                    Program, if any, for the relevant fiscal
                    year and which will be determined by the
                    Compensation Committee of the Board

     2.   All other provisions of the Employment Agreement continue to be
binding as stated within the Employment Agreement and are incorporated herein.

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed and delivered this
Agreement in Newtown, Pennsylvania as of the date first written above.


UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,
INTENDING TO BE LEGALLY BOUND:


By:  /s/ Steven P. Dussek        (SEAL)      By: /s/ John A. Fellows     (SEAL)
     ----------------------------                ------------------------
     Title: Chairman, Compensation                   John A. Fellows
            Committee, Board of Directors


Witness:                                     Witness:
         ------------------------                     -------------------------

                                       -2-