alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3694

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 

clean-fuel vehicles and certain refueling property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2003

Mr. SHERMAN (for himself, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. HONDA, and Mr. 

BAIRD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the deduction for clean-fuel vehicles and certain refueling 

property.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR CLEAN-FUEL 

4 VEHICLES AND CERTAIN REFUELING PROP5 ERTY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

7 179A(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relat8 ing to qualified clean-fuel vehicle property) is amended by 
2

•HR 3694 IH 

1 striking ‘‘December 31, 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘December 

2 31, 2006’’. 

3 (b) PHASEOUT.—Clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of section 

4 179A(b)(1)(B) of such Code (relating to phaseout) is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘2004’’, ‘‘2005’’, and ‘‘2006’’, and 

6 inserting ‘‘2007’’, ‘‘2008’’, and ‘‘2009’’, respectively. 

7 (c) TERMINATION.—Subsection (f) of section 179A of 

8 such Code (relating to termination) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘December 31, 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

10 2009’’. 

11 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 subsection (a) shall apply to property placed in service 

13 after December 31, 2003.

Æ
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06689

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06689\06689_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06689\06689_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06689\06689_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06689\06689_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06689\06689_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06689\06689_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06689\06689_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06689\06689_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

06689\Certification Statement_06689.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06689\Supporting Documentation\06689_bioreactor.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06689\Supporting Documentation\06689_mayo D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06689\Supporting Documentation\06689_Mayo1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06689\Supporting Documentation\06689_Mayo2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06689\Supporting Documentation\06689_POND-1 Diagram Revised.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06689\Supporting Documentation\06689_Water balance A5-3II.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06689\Supporting Documentation\06689_WWT-1 Diagram Revised.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**Exhibit21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIESOF THE REGISTRANT**

**As of December 31, 2006**

Gainesville Bank & Trust, a Georgiabanking corporation

United Bank & Trust, a Georgiabanking corporation

Community Trust Bank, a Georgia bankingcorporation

HomeTown Bank of Villa Rica, a Georgiabanking corporation

GB&T Bancshares, Inc. Statutory TrustI, a Connecticut trust

First National Bank of the South, anational banking corporation

GB&T Bancshares, Inc. Statutory TrustII, a Connecticut trust

Southern Heritage Bancorp, Inc. StatutoryTrust I, a Connecticut trust

First National Bank of Gwinnett, anational banking corporation

Mountain State Bank, a Georgia bankingcorporation

----
PATRICK E. CLARK, Former 

Husband,

Appellant,

v.

CHARLOTTE A. CLARK, Former 

Wife, 

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4660

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 9, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

W. Howard LaPorte, Judge.

Rhonda S. Clyatt, Panama City, for Appellant.

James C. Campbell and Clark H. Henderson of Campbell & Henderson, PLLC, 

Shalimar, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

BENTON, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 811.0 Definition of terms. In this part, unless the context otherwise requires or indicates: ( a ) *Reserve Bank* means the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (and any other Federal Reserve Bank which agrees to issue Federal Financing Bank securities in book-entry form) as fiscal agent of the United States acting on behalf of the Federal Financing Bank and, when indicated, acting in its individual capacity.
( b ) *Federal Financing Bank security* means a Federal Financing Bank bond, note, certificate of indebtedness, or bill issued under the Federal Financing Bank Act of 1973, in the form of a definitive Federal Financing Bank security or a book-entry Federal Financing Bank security.
( c ) *Definitive Federal Financing Bank security* means a Federal Financing Bank bond, note, certificate of indebtedness, or bill issued under the Federal Financing Bank Act of 1973, in engraved or printed form.
( d ) *Book-entry Federal Financing Bank security* means a Federal Financing Bank bond, note, certificate of indebtedness, or bill issued under the Federal Financing Bank Act of 1973, in the form of an entry made as prescribed in this part on the records of a Reserve Bank.
( e ) *Pledge* includes a pledge of, or any other security interest in, Federal Financing Bank securities as collateral for loans or advances or to secure deposits of public monies or the performance of an obligation.
( f ) *Date of call* is the date fixed in the official notice of call published in the Federal Register on which the Federal Financing Bank will make payment of the security before maturity in accordance with its terms.
( g ) *Member bank* means any national bank, State bank or bank or trust company which is a member of a Reserve Bank.
Exhibit
99.3








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection
with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) by CGI Group Inc. (the “Company”), the
undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




·
            the Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




·
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









Date: December
22, 2008




/s/ Michael E.
Roach


Michael E.
Roach


President
and


Chief Executive
Officer
§ 29.1103 Induction systems ducts and air duct systems. ( a ) Each induction system duct upstream of the first stage of the engine supercharger and of the auxiliary power unit compressor must have a drain to prevent the hazardous accumulation of fuel and moisture in the ground attitude. No drain may discharge where it might cause a fire hazard.
( b ) Each duct must be strong enough to prevent induction system failure from normal backfire conditions.
( c ) Each duct connected to components between which relative motion could exist must have means for flexibility.
( d ) Each duct within any fire zone for which a fire-extinguishing system is required must be at least— ( 1 ) Fireproof, if it passes through any firewall; or
( 2 ) Fire resistant, for other ducts, except that ducts for auxiliary power units must be fireproof within the auxiliary power unit fire zone.
( e ) Each auxiliary power unit induction system duct must be fireproof for a sufficient distance upstream of the auxiliary power unit compartment to prevent hot gas reverse flow from burning through auxiliary power unit ducts and entering any other compartment or area of the rotorcraft in which a hazard would be created resulting from the entry of hot gases. The materials used to form the remainder of the induction system duct and plenum chamber of the auxiliary power unit must be capable of resisting the maximum heat conditions likely to occur.
( f ) Each auxiliary power unit induction system duct must be constructed of materials that will not absorb or trap hazardous quantities of flammable fluids that could be ignited in the event of a surge or reverse flow condition.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424), sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-17, 43 FR 50602, Oct. 30, 1978]
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 (the
Report) by CGI Group Inc. (the Company), the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 20, 2012



/s/ Michael E. RoachMichael E. RoachPresident and Chief Executive Officer
129 STAT. 2222 PUBLIC LAW 114–106—DEC. 18, 2015 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3831: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015): 

Dec. 10, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 16, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–106 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the annual comment 

period for payment rates under Medicare Advantage. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Fairness in Regulatory 

Timing Act of 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENDING THE ANNUAL COMMENT PERIOD FOR PAYMENT 

RATES UNDER MEDICARE ADVANTAGE. 

Section 1853(b)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w– 

23(b)(2)) is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(or, in 2017 and each subsequent year, 

at least 60 days)’’ after ‘‘45 days’’; and 

(2) by inserting ‘‘(in 2017 and each subsequent year, of 

no less than 30 days)’’ after ‘‘opportunity’’. 

Approved December 18, 2015. 

Securing 

Fairness in 

Regulatory 

Timing Act of 

2015. 

Dec. 18, 2015 

[H.R. 3831] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLAWLAW
#### Avery *v.*The State.

*Burglary.*

(Decided June 8, 1915.

69 South. 255.)

*Appeal and Error; Dismissal; Bill of Exceptions.*— Where the time allowed by law for presenting the ■ bill of exceptions to the trial judge aud his approval and signing thereof had expired before the call of the division to which the cause was returnable, and no excuses was shown for a failure to prosecute the appeal properly, the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from Shelby County Court.

Heard before Hon. E. S. Lyman.

Tom Avery was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

No counsel marked for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and J. P. Mtjdd, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

BROWN, J.

The appellant was convicted November 30, 1914, for the offense of burglary, and was sentenced t.o the penitentiary for ten years as a punishment for the offense, and from that judgment he appealed, and in response to his written statement of appeal a certificate was filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court January 15, 1915, and on January 30, 1915, delivered to and filed by the clerk of this court, but no transcript has been filed.

It now appearing that the time allowed by law for presenting a bill of exceptions to the trial judge, and the approval and signing thereof by the judge, had expired before the call of the division to which this case *278belongs, and no cause being shown for the failure of the appellant to prosecute bis appeal, tbe motion of tbe Attorney General to dismiss tbe appeal is granted.

Appeal dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Set: 2:00 PM (AST)

Started: 2:21 PM (AST)

Ended: 2:27 PM (AST)

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN DATE: October 3, 2018

COURTROOM DEPUTY: Carmen Tacoronte / Lisa Ng

COURT REPORTER: Sonia Kitter / Steven Griffin

In Re: 

The Financial Oversight and Management 

Board for Puerto Rico

as representative of

3:17-BK-3283 (LTS)

PROMESA Title III

(Jointly Administered)

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al.

Debtors

In Re: Government Development Bank, et al. 3:18-CV-1561 (LTS)

Movants PROMESA Title VI 

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors 

of the Debtors (other than COFINA) Adv. Proc. No. 3:18-00101 (LTS)

Plaintiff,

v.

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Puerto 

Rico Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory 

Authority, the Government Development Bank 

for Puerto Rico, and the Financial Oversight and 

Management Board for Puerto Rico, 

Defendants.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4000 Filed:10/03/18 Entered:10/03/18 15:28:23 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
October 3, 2018 – Motion Hearing

3:17-BK-3283 (LTS) / 3:18-CV-1561 (LTS) / 3:18-AP-101 (LTS)

Page 2 of 2

Case called for Motion Hearing. 

Attorney Friedman requested that the hearing be continued until October 5, 2018 at 10:00 AM 

(AST) to allow the parties to hold discussions. Granted. Hearing reset for October 5, 2018 at 10:00 AM 

(AST) in USDC-SDNY. 

s/Carmen Tacoronte

Carmen Tacoronte

Courtroom Deputy 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4000 Filed:10/03/18 Entered:10/03/18 15:28:23 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

h0127

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

146848

CHERYL D. HARPER,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 146848

AGC: 0978-12

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant. 

______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and 

relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested 

relief.
§ 25.362 Engine failure loads. ( a ) For engine mounts, pylons, and adjacent supporting airframe structure, an ultimate loading condition must be considered that combines 1g flight loads with the most critical transient dynamic loads and vibrations, as determined by dynamic analysis, resulting from failure of a blade, shaft, bearing or bearing support, or bird strike event. Any permanent deformation from these ultimate load conditions must not prevent continued safe flight and landing.
( b ) The ultimate loads developed from the conditions specified in paragraph (a) of this section are to be— ( 1 ) Multiplied by a factor of 1.0 when applied to engine mounts and pylons; and
( 2 ) Multiplied by a factor of 1.25 when applied to adjacent supporting airframe structure.
[Amdt. 25-141, 79 FR 73468, Dec. 11, 2014]
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REMEDIAL ACTION

DELETION DOCKET

FOR

WASTE MANAGEMENT OF MICHIGAN – HOLLAND LAGOONS SITE

HOLLAND, OTTAWA COUNTY, MICHIGAN

APRIL 17, 2012

NO. DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES

1 2006-2011 U.S. EPA Public U.S. EPA Administrative

Record Index (Original ARUpdate #3) for the Waste

Management of MichiganHolland Lagoons Site

(DOCUMENTS CONTAINED ON 

THE AR INDEX ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO

THE DELETION DOCKET)

2 11/29/11 Karl, R., File Final Close Out Report

U.S. EPA for the Waste Management

of Michigan-Holland Lagoons

Site

3 04/05/12 Wyant, D., Karl, R., Letter re: MDEQ ConcurMDEQ U.S. EPA rence with the Proposed

Deletion of Waste Management Holland Lagoons Superfund Site from the National

Priorities List
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2834227-JAN-201108:40 AM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7448

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMIE SYLVESTER HAWKINS, a/k/a Jaime Sylvester

Hawkins,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-00-565-AW; CA-02-3096-AW)

Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: March 31, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamie Sylvester Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. James Marton Trusty,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Sylvester Hawkins, a federal prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his request for

a certificate of appealability, which was in essence a Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60(b) motion that we construe as a successive and unauthorized

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. See United States v. Winestock,

340 F.3d 200, 206 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 995 (2003).

An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255

proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district

court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find both that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-

38; Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252

F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Hawkins has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal.
- 3 -

Additionally, we construe Hawkins’ notice of appeal and

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive

motion under § 2255. See United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d at

208. In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255

motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new

rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made

retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or

(2) newly discovered evidence sufficient to establish that no

reasonable fact finder would have found the movant guilty. 28

U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(C), 2255 (2000). Hawkins does not satisfy

either of these conditions. Therefore, we decline to authorize the

filing of a successive § 2255 motion. We grant the motion to file

an amended brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on form 10-Q for the period ended June 26, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
I. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1).     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2).     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: July 13, 2004                             By: /s/Douglas I. Payne
                                                       ----------------
                                                       Douglas I. Payne
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### § 214.1 Applicability.

This part establishes the terms, conditions, and limitations applicable to charter foreign air transportation pursuant to foreign air carrier permits authorizing the holder to engage in charter transportation only.

(Secs. 204, 402, Pub. L. 85-726, as amended, 72 Stat. 743, 757; 49 U.S.C. 1324, 1371)

[ER-1223, 46 FR 28379, May 26, 1981]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11010]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: May 5, 2000 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  
    1. Agenda for future meeting: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-825-826 (Final)(Polyester Staple Fiber from 
Korea and Taiwan)--briefing and vote. (The Commission will transmit its 
determination to the Secretary of Commerce on May 15, 2000.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets:
    (1) Document No. ER-00-001: Approval of FY 1999 Annual Report.
    (2) Document No. ID-00-005: Approval of 2000 Annual Report in Inv. 
No. 332-345 (Recent Trends in U.S. Services Trade).
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: April 25, 2000.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11010 Filed 4-28-00; 2:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P