alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5/22/18 

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO

TRIAL COURT

SAN JUAN JUDICIAL CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT (905)

LAS MONJAS REALTY II, S.E.

Plaintiff

Vs.

HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY (ACT)

Defendant

CIVIL NO.: K AC2010-1332

IN RE: 

INVERSE EXPROPRIATION

JUDGMENT

The above-captioned parties have reached an agreement that ends the disputes raised and settles

the claims pending in the suit between them. The Court has examined the document in that regard

entitled “SETTLEMENT STIPULATION” filed by the parties on April 27, 2016, accepts it under its

precise terms and conditions, grants its approval and enters Judgment.

The parties in the case at bar will abide by strict compliance with what has been stipulated and

with this Judgment. Thus, the document with that date is made an integral part of this Judgment under the

terms agreed to by the parties.

As the parties have so agreed and this Court has approved it, this Judgment will become firm,

final and unappealable from the time it is issued, and without special ordering of costs, expenses or

attorney fees.

RECORD AND PROVIDE NOTICE.

Issued in San Juan, Puerto Rico, April 29, 2016

[Sgd.]

GLORIA MAYNARD SALGADO

SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE

I certify:

Griselda Rodriguez Collado

Regional Clerk

By: Julia Morales Flores

Deputy Clerk

[Rubber stamp]

Malliam Collazo Huertas [Sgd.]

Deputy Clerk

EXHIBIT 2

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3321-2 Filed:06/20/18 Entered:06/20/18 09:22:34 Desc:

Exhibit 2 - Judgment Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

C&C ROAD CONSTRUCTION, INC., §

Appellant/Cross-Appellee, § No. 08-17-00056-CV

v. § Appeal from the

§ County Court at Law Number Six

SAAB SITE CONTRACTORS, L.P.,

 Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

§ of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2014DCV2960)

§

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in that 

part of the judgment denying Appellee/Cross-Appellant’s appellate attorney’s fees. We therefore 

reverse that portion of the judgment denying appellate attorney’s fees, and remand for a new trial 

limited to the issue of Appellee/Cross-Appellant’s appellate attorney’s fees.

The remainder of the judgment is affirmed, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. 

We further order that Appellee/Cross-Appellant recover from Appellant/Cross-Appellee and its 

sureties, if any, for performance on the judgment and all costs, both in this Court and the court 

below, for which let execution issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and Larsen, J. (Senior Judge)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
§ 129.21 Control of traffic. ( a ) Subject to applicable immigration laws and regulations, each foreign air carrier must furnish sufficient personnel necessary to provide two-way voice communications between its aircraft and stations at places where the FAA finds that communication is necessary but cannot be maintained in a language with which station operators are familiar.
( b ) Each person furnished by a foreign air carrier under paragraph (a) of this section must be able to speak English and the language necessary to maintain communications with its aircraft and must assist station operators in directing traffic.
[Doc. No. FAA-2002-14002, 72 FR 31683, June 7, 2007]
#### § 27.1527 Maximum operating altitude.

The maximum altitude up to which operation is allowed, as limited by flight, structural, powerplant, functional, or equipment characteristics, must be established.

(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c) of the Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))

[Amdt. 27-14, 43 FR 2325, Jan. 16, 1978]
Sec. 19-6 Public disclosure of traffic data. ( a ) Detailed domestic on-flight market data and nonstop segment data except military data shall be made publicly available after processing. Domestic data are defined as data from air transportation operations from a place in any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, or a U.S. territory or possession to a place in any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, or a U.S. territory or possession. Domestic military operations are reported under service codes N or R.
( b ) Detailed international on-flight market and nonstop segment data in Schedule T-100 and Schedule T-100(f) reports, except military data, shall be publicly available immediately following the Department's determination that the database is complete. Military operations are reported under service codes N or R. Data for on-flight markets and nonstop segments involving no U.S. point shall not be made publicly available for three years. Industry and carrier summary data may be made public before the end of six months or the end of three years, as applicable, provided there are three or more carriers in the summary data disclosed. The Department may, at any time, publish international summary statistics without carrier detail. Further, the Department may release nonstop segment and on-flight market detail data by carrier before the end of the confidentiality period as follows: ( 1 ) To foreign governments as provided in reciprocal arrangements between the foreign country and U.S. Government for exchange of on-flight market and/or nonstop segment data submitted by air carriers of that foreign country and U.S. carriers serving that foreign country;
( 2 ) To parties to any proceeding before the Department under 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, as required by the Administrative Law Judge or other decisionmaker of the Department. Parties may designate agents or consultants to receive the data in their behalf, provided the agents or consultants agree to abide by the disclosure restrictions. Any data to which access is granted pursuant to this provision may be introduced into evidence, subject to the normal rules of admissibility of evidence.
( 3 ) To agencies and other components of the U.S. Government for their internal use only.
[Amdt. 241-59, 56 FR 2845, Jan. 25, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 6719, Feb. 13, 1997; 67 FR 49224, July 30, 2002; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15931, Apr. 16, 2019; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2018-0132, 88 FR 6160, Jan. 31, 2023]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

§

JERRY REED, §

§ No. 302, 2022

Defendant-Below, Appellant, §

§ Court Below: Superior Court

v. § of the State of Delaware

§

STATE OF DELAWARE, §

§ ID No. 1809015387(S)

Appellee. §

§

Submitted: March 15, 2023

Decided: April 17, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, VAUGHN, TRAYNOR, Justices and 

NEWELL, Chief Judge, constituting the Court en Banc.

1

 

O R D E R

This 17th day of April 2023, having considered this matter on the briefs and oral 

arguments of the parties and the record below, and having concluded that the same should 

be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its 

Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 27, 2022;

NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that the decision and judgment of the 

Superior Court be and the same hereby is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

1 Sitting by designation pursuant to Del. Const. Art. IV §§ 12 and 38 and Supreme Court Rules 2 

and 4(a) to fill the quorum as required.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, that:

|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | the report
 fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the
 Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                                                                                                        
|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | the
 information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the Corporations financial condition and results of operations of
 the corporation as of the dates and for the periods expressed in this
 quarterly report.

/s/ Kevin A.
Schmidt
Kevin A. Schmidt, Principal Financial Officer

Dated: August
13, 2009

31

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certificate
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of GB&T Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory L. Hamby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Gregory L. HambyGregory L. Hamby, Chief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------

March 15,
2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GB&T Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by GB&T and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

---
§ 27.547 Main rotor structure. ( a ) Each main rotor assembly (including rotor hubs and blades) must be designed as prescribed in this section.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) The main rotor structure must be designed to withstand the following loads prescribed in §§ 27.337 through 27.341: ( 1 ) Critical flight loads.
( 2 ) Limit loads occurring under normal conditions of autorotation. For this condition, the rotor r.p.m. must be selected to include the effects of altitude.
( d ) The main rotor structure must be designed to withstand loads simulating— ( 1 ) For the rotor blades, hubs, and flapping hinges, the impact force of each blade against its stop during ground operation; and
( 2 ) Any other critical condition expected in normal operation.
( e ) The main rotor structure must be designed to withstand the limit torque at any rotational speed, including zero. In addition: ( 1 ) The limit torque need not be greater than the torque defined by a torque limiting device (where provided), and may not be less than the greater of— ( i ) The maximum torque likely to be transmitted to the rotor structure in either direction; and
( ii ) The limit engine torque specified in § 27.361.
( 2 ) The limit torque must be distributed to the rotor blades in a rational manner.
(Secs. 604, 605, 72 Stat. 778, 49 U.S.C. 1424, 1425)
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-3, 33 FR 14105, Sept. 18, 1968]
§ 257.6 Effective and compliance dates. ( a ) This Part is effective as of August 25, 1999.
( b ) Compliance with the following sections is mandatory as of August 25, 1999: ( 1 ) § 257.1, § 257.2, § 257.3, § 257.4, § 257.5(d), and § 257.6.
( 2 ) § 257.5(b) to the extent that it requires sellers of air transportation to give consumers oral notice before booking transportation involving a code-share arrangement ( i ) Of the fact that the selling carrier is not the transporting carrier and
( ii ) Of the transporting carrier's identity (as shown by its two-letter designator code in CRS displays).
( c ) Compliance with the following sections is mandatory as of March 15, 2000: ( 1 ) § 257.5(a) and § 257.5(c) in their entirety.
( 2 ) § 257.5(b) insofar as it requires sellers of air transportation to give consumers ( i ) Oral notice before booking transportation involving a code-share arrangement of the transporting carrier's corporate name and any other name under which the service is held out to the public and
( ii ) The same disclosures for long-term wet leases as for code-sharing arrangements.
[64 FR 46821, Aug. 27, 1999]
§ 152.507 Termination for convenience. ( a ) When the continuation of the project would not produce beneficial results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds, the grant may be terminated in whole, or in part, upon mutual agreement of the FAA and the sponsor or planning agency.
( b ) If an agreement to terminate is made, the sponsor or planning agency— ( 1 ) May not incur new obligations for the terminated portion after the effective date; and
( 2 ) Shall cancel as many obligations, relating to the terminated portion, as possible.
( c ) The sponsor or planning agency is allowed full credit for the Federal share of the noncancellable obligations that were properly incurred by the sponsor before the termination.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summary financial
information which has been extracted from the financial statements of
Australian-Canadian Oil Royalties LTD.s for the annual financial statements
filed on Form 10KSB for the periods presented.  These summary schedules are
qualified in their entirety by reference to such financial statements and
the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999      DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         246,152          263,188
<SECURITIES>                                         0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,575            1,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249,381          266,827
<PP&E>                                         308,966          307,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,426)          (6,363)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 553,323          570,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,279            3,356
<BONDS>                                              0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                0
<COMMON>                                       611,448          607,848
<OTHER-SE>                                    (59,404)         (41,045)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   553,323          570,159
<SALES>                                          7,118            5,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,118            5,545
<CGS>                                                0                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,392           40,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,408)         (34,885)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,135            1,672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,543)         (36,557)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                0
<CHANGES>                                            0                0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,543)         (36,557)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0           (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0           (0.01)


</TABLE>
#### §§ 25.725-25.727 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7925

RICHARD LAMAR FENSTERMACHER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA95-1165-R)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Lamar Fenstermacher, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. The district court's dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064,

1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice could be

final if "no amendment [to the petition] could cure defects in the

plaintiff's case." Id. at 1067. In ascertaining whether a dismissal

without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must determine "whether the [petitioner] could save his action by merely

amending the [petition]." Id. at 1066-67.

Because Appellant could have amended his petition to assert

some claims, the dismissal order is not appealable. Accordingly,

while we grant Appellant's motions to amend his informal brief, we

deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
February 26, 2003



February 26, 2003



 

 

Mr. Ronald N. Warner

10 Stockton Drive

Voorhees, New Jersey 08043



Dear Ron:



I am pleased to confirm the following adjustments to your compensation, in recognition of your status as a member of my Leadership Team.






	Your target bonus under our Performance Incentive Plan has increased from 45% to 50% of your salary.






	As a Senior Vice President and member of my Leadership Team, you will be eligible additional protection for Alpharma's Executive Severance and Change of Control Plans.  The Severance Plan provides for 18 months of salary continuation should your employment be terminated by the Company for any reason other than "for Cause".  All vested stock options will remain exercisable for 30 days following termination date, and all unvested stock options will be forfeited.



The Change of Control Plan provides for an additional 12 months of salary continuation (30 months total) should certain changes to the Company's ownership structure occur and, for a two-year period following such change, your employment is terminated for any reason other than "for Cause", or there is a diminution in your job responsibilities, or your job is relocated more than 50 miles away.  All outstanding stock options will become vested upon a Change of Control and will remain exercisable through the remaining stock option periods.


During any periods of salary continuation, you will continue to participate in the company's healthcare plans at normal employee rates and be covered under the Company's Life Insurance and Accidental Death and Dismemberment Plans.




	Beginning with the effective date of your new position, you will receive an Executive Allowance at the Leadership Team level of $28,600 per year (taxable) for automobile costs, insurance and financial planning assistance.




In all other respects, the terms of your original offer letter continue to apply.

Ron, we believe that this enhanced package provides you with the necessary incentives to be fully devoted to the ongoing success of our business.  I look forward to working with you as a key member of my Leadership Team.


Sincerely,


 

/s/ Ingrid Wiik

Ingrid Wiik

CEO & President


cc: George Rose
§ 27.977 Fuel tank outlet. ( a ) There must be a fuel stainer for the fuel tank outlet or for the booster pump. This strainer must— ( 1 ) For reciprocating engine powered rotorcraft, have 8 to 16 meshes per inch; and
( 2 ) For turbine engine powered rotorcraft, prevent the passage of any object that could restrict fuel flow or damage any fuel system component.
( b ) The clear area of each fuel tank outlet strainer must be at least five times the area of the outlet line.
( c ) The diameter of each strainer must be at least that of the fuel tank outlet.
( d ) Each finger strainer must be accessible for inspection and cleaning.
[Amdt. 27-11, 41 FR 55470, Dec. 20, 1976]
#### § 136.5 Additional requirements for Hawaii.

Any operator subject to this subpart who meets the criteria of § 136.71 must comply with the additional requirements and restrictions in subpart D of this part.

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1563; Amdt. No. 136-2, 88 FR 48091, July 26, 2023]
457379 © -58 (In pocket)

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1046 = PLATE 16

Milliroentgens
per hour
0.050

0.000
Gamma-ray readings on surface by hand scintillation counter .
(Includes cosmic component) Nhitude chove
= surface sea level
outcrop Ws eee,
ee ee
? ——
50 ° 50 100 150 200 Feet 50
beri i 1 1 1 4
Ain Depths,Somple Percent Percent Percent i oe
PL infect’ No. U wuortz
ERAN SION ‘00 — FeO ae 110 — Feet
ea
Sand x302 0.001 0.7 67.9
ie
Cloyey sand ‘x303 002 5 66.7 reer
13.5—
x304 < .001 4 71.5
f
Sp 1.05305 001 6 62.2
195=— F : 90 _|
en 306.002 2.4 54.3,
23.5—
x307 O17 3.3 ater
Phosphate pellets
30.5 — oo
308.002 62 53.4
Leached phosphorite 34.5—
[Eat 309.00! 3.5 23.6
Limestone ne
© 1000
Lp 98 —
Resistivity og, income «X31. L001 2.0 10.9
per minuto
48.5—
® 60 -|
x31] .001 3.5 26.1
Drill cuttings logged by G.H. Espenshade
and L.A. Brubaker, March 1955
56.5— -

LONGITUDINAL SECTIONS OF AUGER DRILL HOLE 30 IN SE. % SEC

. 19, T. 16 S., R. 22 E., MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA