alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S
REPORT  ON FORM  10-Q FOR THE  FISCAL  QUARTER  ENDED  OCTOBER  31,  2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                         1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                         OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                       7,040
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,255
<PP&E>                                      58,708
<DEPRECIATION>                              46,497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,385
<BONDS>                                         65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                 21,021
<COMMON>                                    28,761
<OTHER-SE>                                 (64,384)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,062
<SALES>                                     86,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            86,172
<CGS>                                       87,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               87,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (7,798)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (7,798)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (7,798)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.70)


</TABLE>
§ 29.519 Hull type rotorcraft: Water-based and amphibian. ( a ) *General.* For hull type rotorcraft, the structure must be designed to withstand the water loading set forth in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section considering the most severe wave heights and profiles for which approval is desired. The loads for the landing conditions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section must be developed and distributed along and among the hull and auxiliary floats, if used, in a rational and conservative manner, assuming a rotor lift not exceeding two-thirds of the rotorcraft weight to act throughout the landing impact.
( b ) *Vertical landing conditions.* The rotorcraft must initially contact the most critical wave surface at zero forward speed in likely pitch and roll attitudes which result in critical design loadings. The vertical descent velocity may not be less than 6.5 feet per second relative to the mean water surface.
( c ) *Forward speed landing conditions.* The rotorcraft must contact the most critical wave at forward velocities from zero up to 30 knots in likely pitch, roll, and yaw attitudes and with a vertical descent velocity of not less than 6.5 feet per second relative to the mean water surface. A maximum forward velocity of less than 30 knots may be used in design if it can be demonstrated that the forward velocity selected would not be exceeded in a normal one-engine-out landing.
( d ) *Auxiliary float immersion condition.* In addition to the loads from the landing conditions, the auxiliary float, and its support and attaching structure in the hull, must be designed for the load developed by a fully immersed float unless it can be shown that full immersion of the float is unlikely, in which case the highest likely float buoyancy load must be applied that considers loading of the float immersed to create restoring moments compensating for upsetting moments caused by side wind, asymmetrical rotorcraft loading, water wave action, and rotorcraft inertia.
[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 966, Jan. 26, 196, as amended by Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 8002, Mar. 6, 1990]
EXHIBIT 24.1



POWER OF ATTORNEY



WHEREAS, the undersigned officers and directors of ITXC Corp.
(ITXC) desire to authorize Tom Evslin and Edward B. Jordan to act as their attorneys-in-fact and agents, for the purpose of executing and filing the annual report described below, including all amendments and supplements thereto,



NOW, THEREFORE,



KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints Tom Evslin and Edward B. Jordan, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, to sign the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002, including any and all amendments and supplements to such Annual report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might or could
do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this power of attorney in
the following capacities as of the 31st day of March 2003.



|Signature                                     |  | Title                                               |  | 
|--------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/S/    TOM
EVSLINTom Evslin                   |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer     |  | 
|                                             
|/S/    FRANK
GILLFrank Gill                   |  | Director                                            |  | 
|                                             
|/S/    EDWARD B.
JORDANEdward B. Jordan       |  | Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Director |  | 
|                                             
|/S/    LIAM
STRONGLiam Strong                 |  | Director                                            |  | 
|                                             
|/S/    FREDERICK R.
WILSONFrederick R. Wilson |  | Director                                            |  |
No. 76-6266.

#### Caldwell *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 27.955 Fuel flow. ( a ) *General.* The fuel system for each engine must be shown to provide the engine with at least 100 percent of the fuel required under each operating and maneuvering condition to be approved for the rotorcraft including, as applicable, the fuel required to operate the engine(s) under the test conditions required by § 27.927. Unless equivalent methods are used, compliance must be shown by test during which the following provisions are met except that combinations of conditions which are shown to be improbable need not be considered. ( 1 ) The fuel pressure, corrected for critical accelerations, must be within the limits specified by the engine type certificate data sheet.
( 2 ) The fuel level in the tank may not exceed that established as the unusable fuel supply for that tank under § 27.959, plus the minimum additional fuel necessary to conduct the test.
( 3 ) The fuel head between the tank outlet and the engine inlet must be critical with respect to rotorcraft flight attitudes.
( 4 ) The critical fuel pump (for pump-fed systems) is installed to produce (by actual or simulated failure) the critical restriction to fuel flow to be expected from pump failure.
( 5 ) Critical values of engine rotation speed, electrical power, or other sources of fuel pump motive power must be applied.
( 6 ) Critical values of fuel properties which adversely affect fuel flow must be applied.
( 7 ) The fuel filter required by § 27.997 must be blocked to the degree necessary to simulate the accumulation of fuel contamination required to activate the indicator required by § 27.1305(q).
( b ) *Fuel transfer systems.* If normal operation of the fuel system requires fuel to be transferred to an engine feed tank, the transfer must occur automatically via a system which has been shown to maintain the fuel level in the engine feed tank within acceptable limits during flight or surface operation of the rotorcraft.
( c ) *Multiple fuel tanks.* If an engine can be supplied with fuel from more than one tank, the fuel systems must, in addition to having appropriate manual switching capability, be designed to prevent interruption of fuel flow to that engine, without attention by the flightcrew, when any tank supplying fuel to that engine is depleted of usable fuel during normal operation, and any other tank that normally supplies fuel to the engine alone contains usable fuel.
[Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34212, Sept. 2, 1988]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

t1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

145903

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145903

COA: 304694 

Jackson CC: 10-005615-FC

KENNETH DAVID COATSWORTH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
i /', ✓ ".: ;


### MANIVIV CERAMICS S I N C E 1 8 8 5
April 18, 2013 Alex Cristafaro, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency David Rostker, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy Cortney Higgins, U.S. Office of Management and Budget Dear Mr. Cristafaro, Mr. Rostker, and Ms. Higgins: My company is a small brick manufacturing company that has the potential to be significantly impacted by the upcoming MACT standard for major sources in the brick and structural clay processing industry. We are not a formal Small Entity Representative (SER) in the current review panel being conducted under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA). We are also not members of the Brick Industry Association (BIA). However, all of our industry is working together with the BIA on this critical rulemaking and they are keeping us apprised of the activities on this rule. We consider them to be speaking on all industry's behalf as they work with you. Sincerely, Daniel Cabeza President

Post Office Box 1134 0 Marion, South Carolina 29571 0(843) 423-1311 0 WATTS (800) 845-4010 0 FAX (843) 423-1515
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In      connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific CMA, Inc. (the “Company”) on      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anita Chan, Chief      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as      added by ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| a.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b.                  | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/                Anita Chan                                       |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                  Anita Chan                              |
|   |   | Title:                                 Chief Financial Officer |

----
#### § 14.30 Payment of award.

An applicant seeking payment of an award shall submit to the disbursing official of the FAA a copy of the FAA Decisionmaker's final decision granting the award, accompanied by a statement that the applicant will not seek review of the decision in the United States courts. Applications for award grants in cases involving the FAA shall be sent to: The Office of Accounting and Audit, AAA-1, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. The agency will pay the amount awarded to the applicant within 60 days, unless judicial review of the award or of the underlying decision of the adversary adjudication has been sought by the applicant or any other party to the proceeding.
Attachment 4Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:24637-5   Filed:06/22/23   Entered:06/22/23 19:25:02    Desc: 

Attachment 4   Page 1 of 3

Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:24637-5   Filed:06/22/23   Entered:06/22/23 19:25:02    Desc: Attachment 4   Page 2 of 3

Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:24637-5   Filed:06/22/23   Entered:06/22/23 19:25:02    Desc: Attachment 4   Page 3 of 3
§ 29.733 Tires. Each landing gear wheel must have a tire— ( a ) That is a proper fit on the rim of the wheel; and
( b ) Of a rating that is not exceeded under— ( 1 ) The design maximum weight;
( 2 ) A load on each main wheel tire equal to the static ground reaction corresponding to the critical center of gravity; and
( 3 ) A load on nose wheel tires (to be compared with the dynamic rating established for those tires) equal to the reaction obtained at the nose wheel, assuming that the mass of the rotorcraft acts as the most critical center of gravity and exerts a force of 1.0 *g* downward and 0.25 *g* forward, the reactions being distributed to the nose and main wheels according to the principles of statics with the drag reaction at the ground applied only at wheels with brakes.
( c ) Each tire installed on a retractable landing gear system must, at the maximum size of the tire type expected in service, have a clearance to surrounding structure and systems that is adequate to prevent contact between the tire and any part of the structure or systems.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-12, 41 FR 55471, Dec. 20, 1976]
#### § 216.6 Existing unauthorized operations.

Notwithstanding the provisions of § 216.3, if within 30 days after the effective date of this part a carrier files an application for a Special Authorization to continue to perform existing blind sector operations which have been regularly performed by such carrier commencing on a date prior to August 9, 1967, such carrier may continue to engage in such blind sector operations until final decision by the Department on such application: *Provided,* That any such application shall, in addition to the requirements of § 216.4(a), contain a statement that the carrier is relying upon this section for continuance of preexisting blind sector operations, and shall fully describe such operations including the date inaugurated, and the frequency and continuity of performance.

[ER-525, 33 FR 692, Jan. 19, 1968, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15926, Apr. 16, 2019]
**Exhibit 23.1**
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(File No. 333-59825, effective July 24, 1998, File No. 333-66331, effective October 29, 1998,Amendment No. 1 thereto dated February 22, 1999, File No. 333-76527, effective April 19, 1999,File No. 333-79919, effective June 3, 1999, FileNo. 333-31330, effective February 29, 2000, and File No.333-106983, effective July 10, 2003)of BindView Development Corporation of our reports dated March 11, 2005 relating to the financialstatements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to usunder the heading “Selected Financial Data” in such Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
180711 ARES LIFT STAY SCH ORD VERSION JULY 11, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY 

IN ARES ET AL V. SECRETARY OF LABOR AFTER COMPLETION OF CONFERRAL PROCESS

The Court has received and reviewed the Motion for Relief from Stay in Ares Et 

Al v. Secretary of Labor After Completion of Conferral Process (the “Motion”). (Docket Entry 

No. 3476.) Opposition papers to the Motion must be filed by July 24, 2018. Movant’s reply 

papers must be filed by July 31, 2018. The Court will thereafter take the Motion on submission, 

unless a party thereto requests a hearing.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 11, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number 

and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation 

Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); 

(iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico 

Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3478 Filed:07/11/18 Entered:07/11/18 10:21:32 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00655

- CV

Rosaly CANALES d/b/a Marathon Bulk Transport

, Appellant

v.

CAPITOL AGGREGATES, INC.

, Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI05174 Honorable Cathy Stryker, Judge Presiding 1

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding damages in the amount of $500,000 and exemplary damages in the amount of $1,000,000 is REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED for a new trial on the issue of these unliquidated damages. The remaining part of the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED August 5, 2020.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

1 The Honorable Cathy Stryker signed the default judgment. The Honorable Michael E. Mery heard the motion for

new trial.
1

The Honorable Theodore McMillian died on January 18, 2006. This opinion

is being filed by the remaining judges of the panel pursuant to 8th Cir. Rule 47E.

2

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2219

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

Ronald H. Tucker, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 5, 2006

Filed: January 25, 2006

___________

Before BYE, McMILLIAN,1

 and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ronald H. Tucker appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court2

for the Northern District of Iowa upon the revocation of his supervised release. The

district court sentenced Tucker to nine months in prison. For reversal, Tucker argues

that the sentence imposed is unreasonable under the standard of review announced in
-2-

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). His counsel has moved to withdraw.

For the reasons discussed below, we grant counsel’s motion and affirm.

We conclude that the sentence imposed is not unreasonable. See United States

v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). A sentence of nine months

in prison represents the middle of the range recommended by the policy statements

in the Sentencing Guidelines, and it is supported by the fact that several non-prison

options (outpatient drug treatment, inpatient drug treatment, and time in a community

corrections center) had failed to stop Tucker’s ongoing use of crack cocaine.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the

judgment of the district court.

______________________________
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
      on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-56496 and 33-99181) of our report dated March 20, 2007
      relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
      schedule of CoSine Communications, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form
      10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.








/s/    
      Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP


Palo
      Alto, California


March 20,
      2007