alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.

November 9, 2010

Contango Oil & Gas Company

3700 Buffalo Speedway, Suite 960

Houston, Texas
77098



| | Re: | Contango Oil & Gas Company, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------

Gentlemen:

The firm of William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. consents to
the use of its name and to the use of its projections for Contango Oil & Gas Companys Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of November 9, 2010 in Contangos Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2010.

William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. has no interests in Contango Oil & Gas Company or in any
affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with Contango Oil & Gas Company. Contango Oil & Gas Company does
not employ us on a contingent basis.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|Yours very truly,                 
|                                  
|WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
|                                  
|/s/ F.J. MAREK                    
|F.J. Marek, P.E.                  
|Senior Vice President
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B d e C.V. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 25, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ José Antonio Fernández Carbajal                    
|                    |  |  |  | José Antonio Fernández Carbajal
Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 25, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Javier Astaburuaga Sanjines                        
|                    |  |  |  | Javier Astaburuaga Sanjines
Chief Financial Officer
1. The plat of the survey of an island in Jefferson Lake, Township 109 North, Range 24 West, Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota, accepted on January 6, 2000, will be officially filed in Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., on February 22, 2000. The tract shown below describes the island omitted from the original survey.

## Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota 

T. 109 N. R. 24 W. 

Tract No. 37.

2. Tract No. 37 is firm land rising 8-10 ft. above the ordinary high water mark. The soil has evolved from glacial till parent material and is similar to the soil found on the adjacent uplands. Numerous small stones were located along the northerly and westerly sandy shore line of the island. Tree species consist of ash, basswood, cedar, elm, and oak, ranging in size from 8 to 20 inches in diameter, with a maximum age of 120+ years. The ground cover consists of hazel, willow and native grasses on the southerly and easterly shore line. 

3. The present water level of the lake compares favorably with that of the original meander line; therefore, the elevation and upland character of the island along with the depth and width of the lake between the adjacent upland and the island are considered evidence that the island did exist in 1858, the year Minnesota was admitted to the Union. The original survey in 1855 did not note the presence of this island. 

4. Tract No. 37 is more than 50 percent upland in character within the interpretation of the Swamp and Overflow Act of September 28, 1850 (9 Stat. 519) as extended to the State of Minnesota under the Act of March 12, 1860 (12 Stat. 3). Therefore, the island is held to be public land. 

                    5. The survey was requested by the Assistant Field Manager, Division of Natural Resource Management, under the authority of Section 211 of FLPMA (43 U.S.C. 1721) and the Minnesota                     Start Printed Page 2640                    Public Lands Improvement Act of 1990, P.L. 101-442 (104 Stat. 1020).                 

6. Except for valid existing rights, this island will not be subject to application, petition, location or selection under any public law until February 22, 2000. 

7. Interested parties protesting the determination that these islands are public land of the United States, must present valid proof showing that the island in question did not exist at the time of statehood or that it was attached to the mainland at the time of the original survey. Such protests must be submitted in writing to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., February 22, 2000. 

Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and prepayment of the appropriate fee.

Dated: January 6, 2000.

Stephen G. Kopach, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor.

[FR Doc. 00-1114 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B.
      Grant Yarber, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ *B. Grant Yarber*


B.
      Grant Yarber


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


November
      9, 2006




This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
      Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
§ 23.2315 Means of egress and emergency exits. ( a ) With the cabin configured for takeoff or landing, the airplane is designed to: ( 1 ) Facilitate rapid and safe evacuation of the airplane in conditions likely to occur following an emergency landing, excluding ditching for level 1, level 2, and single-engine level 3 airplanes.
( 2 ) Have means of egress (openings, exits, or emergency exits), that can be readily located and opened from the inside and outside. The means of opening must be simple and obvious and marked inside and outside the airplane.
( 3 ) Have easy access to emergency exits when present.
( b ) Airplanes approved for aerobatics must have a means to egress the airplane in flight.
[Doc. No. FAA-2015-1621, Amdt. 23-64, 81 FR 96689, Dec. 30, 2016, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. 23-65, 87 FR 75710, Dec. 9, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-108]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 99F-5522]


Food Irradiation Coalition c/o National Food Processors 
Association; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that The 
National Food Processors Association, on behalf of The Food Irradiation 
Coalition, has filed a petition proposing that the food additive 
regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of ionizing 
radiation for control of food-borne pathogens, and extension of shelf-
life, in a variety of human foods up to a maximum irradiation dosage of 
4.5 kilograys (kGy) for non-frozen and non-dry products, and 10.0 kGy 
for frozen or dry products.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lane A. Highbarger, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-206), Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3032.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 9M4697) has been filed by The National Food 
Processors Association on behalf of The Food Irradiation Coalition, 
1350 I St. NW., Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005. The petition proposes 
that the food additive regulations in part 179 Irradiation in the 
Production, Processing and Handling of Food (21 CFR part 179) be 
amended to provide for the safe use of ionizing radiation for control 
of food-borne pathogens, and extension of shelf-life, in a variety of 
human foods up to a maximum irradiation dosage of 4.5 kGy for non-
frozen and non-dry products, and 10.0 kGy for frozen or dry products, 
including: (1) Pre-processed meat and poultry; (2) both raw and pre-
processed vegetables, fruits, and other agricultural products of plant 
origin; (3) certain multi-ingredient food products. The petition does 
not cover products composed in whole or in part of raw meat, poultry, 
or fish nor does it cover ``ready-to-eat'' fish products or ingredients 
made from fish.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(j) that this action is 
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

    Dated: December 20, 1999
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 00-108 Filed 1-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

FRANCIS QUIROZ
, Appellant,

v.

ANDRES TORRES

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1878

[ October 6, 2021 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Scott R. Kerner , Judge; L.T. Case

No. 502020DR007413

.

Dania Viñuela and Rosa Garcia Acevedo of Family Help Center, LLC, Pembroke Pines, for appellant.

Dina Gutierrez of Law Office of Dina Gutierrez, Hollywood, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

A

ffirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979); Waites v. Middleton , 302 So. 3d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020).

C IKLIN
, L EVINE
, and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Imperial County Air Pollution Control District

Rule No(s): 101 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended February 9, 2016

Rule Title(s): Definition

Date Submitte d to ARB: March 29, 2016

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 10/ 22 /20 13

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Reyes Romero Phone Number: 442

- 265

- 1800 E

- mail Address: reyesromero @co.imperial.ca.us

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Rule 101 was amended to update the sections where Large Confined Animal Facilities thresholds are referenced.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: NONE

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N / A Area Affected: N / A

Future Year Control Profile Esti mate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N /

ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N /A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baselin e Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOU RCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: N/A

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N / A %

Number of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: N/A Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional shee ts as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) N/A of the Rule.

Other M ethods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: N / A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Section(s): N / A

Recordkeeping Requiremen ts in Section(s): N / A Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N / ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: N/ A
§ 27.751 Main float buoyancy. ( a ) For main floats, the buoyancy necessary to support the maximum weight of the rotorcraft in fresh water must be exceeded by— ( 1 ) 50 percent, for single floats; and
( 2 ) 60 percent, for multiple floats.
( b ) Each main float must have enough water-tight compartments so that, with any single main float compartment flooded, the main floats will provide a margin of positive stability great enough to minimize the probability of capsizing.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-2, 33 FR 963, Jan. 26, 1968]
Exhibit 32.2 SECTION 906 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
AND
ACCOUNTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION Form of Certification Pursuant to
Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code I, Matthew R.
Middendorf, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) and Treasurer of Arcadia Resources, Inc., certify that, to the best of
my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Arcadia Resources, Inc. /s/
Matthew R. Middendorf 
Matthew R. Middendorf 
Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Dated: February 9, 2011 A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Arcadia Resources,
Inc. The statement will be retained by Arcadia Resources, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  4
§ 27.951 General. ( a ) Each fuel system must be constructed and arranged to ensure a flow of fuel at a rate and pressure established for proper engine functioning under any likely operating condition, including the maneuvers for which certification is requested.
( b ) Each fuel system must be arranged so that— ( 1 ) No fuel pump can draw fuel from more than one tank at a time; or
( 2 ) There are means to prevent introducing air into the system.
( c ) Each fuel system for a turbine engine must be capable of sustained operation throughout its flow and pressure range with fuel initially saturated with water at 80 °F. and having 0.75cc of free water per gallon added and cooled to the most critical condition for icing likely to be encountered in operation.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-9, 39 FR 35461, Oct. 1, 1974]
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark J. Ferrer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Critical Path, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: April 13, 2007By:

/s/    MARK J.
FERRERMark J. Ferrer Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
In-Person Attendees: The Gas Compressor Meeting

Meeting Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip

Bolduc , Christopher N/A Lawrence Berkley National Laboratory 

(LBNL)

1 Cyclotron Road, Mail-Stp-

: 90-4000

Berkeley CA 94720

Boss, Terry D. Senior Vice President Interstate Natural Gas Association of 

America (INGAA)

20 F Street NW, Suite 450 Washington DC 20001

Boteler, Robert N/A Nidec Motor Corporation 2488 Annapolis Way St. Charles MO 63303-2905

Brookman, Douglas Facilitator Public Solutions, Inc. 108 Newburg Avenue Baltimore MD 21228

Brown, Michael N/A Navigant Consultant, Inc. 1200 19th Street NW, Suite 

700

Washington DC 20036

Coffey, Brian Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 255 Alhambra Circle, Suite 

810

coral Gables FL 33134

deLaski, Andrew Executive Director Appliance Standards Awareness 

Project (ASAP)

16 Cohasset Street Boston MA 02131

Grahovac, Milica N/A Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory (LBNL)

1821 Highland Place Berkeley CA 94709

Klinke, Kurt Consultant Navigant Consultine, Inc. 1200 19th Street, NW, 

Suite 700

Washington DC 20036

Rosenstock, Steven P.E. 

J.

Senior Manager, Energy 

Solutions

Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

N.W.

Washington DC 20004-2696

Sharbataghlie, Shabnam Associate - Government 

Affairs and Policy

GE 1299 Pennsylvania Ave, 

NW, Suite 900W

Washington DC 20004

Weintraub, Daniel Senior Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 South Bedford Street, 

Suite 400,

Burlington MA 01803-5154
§ 145.61 Limited ratings. ( a ) The FAA may issue a limited rating to a certificated repair station that maintains or alters only a particular type of airframe, powerplant, propeller, radio, instrument, or accessory, or part thereof, or performs only specialized maintenance requiring equipment and skills not ordinarily performed under other repair station ratings. Such a rating may be limited to a specific model aircraft, engine, or constituent part, or to any number of parts made by a particular manufacturer.
( b ) The FAA issues limited ratings for— ( 1 ) Airframes of a particular make and model;
( 2 ) Engines of a particular make and model;
( 3 ) Propellers of a particular make and model;
( 4 ) Instruments of a particular make and model;
( 5 ) Radio equipment of a particular make and model;
( 6 ) Accessories of a particular make and model;
( 7 ) Landing gear components;
( 8 ) Floats, by make;
( 9 ) Nondestructive inspection, testing, and processing;
( 10 ) Emergency equipment;
( 11 ) Rotor blades, by make and model;
( 12 ) Aircraft fabric work;
( 13 ) Any other purpose for which the FAA finds the applicant's request is appropriate.
( c ) For a limited rating for specialized services, the operations specifications of the repair station must contain the specification used to perform the specialized service. The specification may be— ( 1 ) A civil or military specification currently used by industry and approved by the FAA, or
( 2 ) A specification developed by the applicant and approved by the FAA.
[Docket No. FAA-1999-5836, 66 FR 41117, Aug. 6, 2001, as amended by Docket FAA-2016-8744, Amdt. 145-31, 81 FR 49163, July 27, 2016]