alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Andy Buxton, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 253 C.D. 2020

:

Office of Attorney General, :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, December 2, 2020, upon consideration of Petitioner’s

application for reconsideration/reargument, and Respondent’s answer in 

response thereto, the application is denied.
§ 1261.400 Scope of subpart. ( a ) These regulations do the following: ( 1 ) Prescribe standards for the administrative collection, compromise, suspension or termination of collection, and referral to the General Accounting Office (GAO), and/or to the Department of Justice (DJ) for litigation, of civil claims as defined by 31 U.S.C. 3701(b), arising out of the activities of NASA;
( 2 ) Designate the responsible NASA officials authorized to effect actions hereunder; and
( 3 ) Require compliance with the GAO/DJ joint regulations at 4 CFR parts 101 through 105 and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regulations at 5 CFR part 550, subpart K.
( b ) Failure to comply with any provision of the GAO/DJ or OPM regulations shall not be available as a defense to any debtor (4 CFR 101.8).
( c ) These regulations do not include any claim based in whole or in part on violation of the anti-trust laws; any claim as to which there is an indication of fraud, the presentation of a false claim, or misrepresentation on the part of the debtor or any party having an interest in the claim; tax claims; or Federal interagency claims (4 CFR 101.3).
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

IN RE: No. 08-15-00161-CR

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Relator.

§

§

§

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against 

the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 243rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas, and 

concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be dismissed as moot. We therefore 

dismiss as moot the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2017.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J., not participating
# SUMMARY:

 In accordance with the requirement of Section 3506 (c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 which provides opportunity for public comment on new or revised data collections, the Railroad Retirement Board will publish periodic summaries of proposed data collections. 

*Comments are invited on:*                         (a) Whether the proposed information collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information has practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB's estimate of the burden of the collection of the information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden related to the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.                    

### *Title and Purpose of Information Collection*

#### Repayment of Debt: OMB 3220-0169

When the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) determines that an overpayment of Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) benefits has occurred, it initiates prompt action to notify the annuitant of the overpayment and to recover the money owed the RRB. In addition to the customary form of repayment (check, money order, annuity withholding), repayment of a debt owed the RRB can also be made by means of a credit card. To effect payment by credit card, the RRB utilizes Form G-421f, Repayment by Credit Card. Minor non-burden impacting editorial changes are being proposed to Form G-421f. One form is completed by each respondent. Completion is voluntary. RRB procedures pertaining to benefit overpayment determinations and the recovery of such benefits are prescribed in 20 CFR 255 and 340.

### Estimate of Annual Respondent Burden

                        The estimated annual respondent burden is as follows:                        Start Printed Page 2651

# ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: 

To request more information or to obtain a copy of the information collection justification, forms, and/or supporting material, please call the RRB Clearance Officer at (312) 751-3363. Comments regarding the information collection should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 N. Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice.

Chuck Mierzwa,

Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-1117 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
§ 29.351 Yawing conditions. ( a ) Each rotorcraft must be designed for the loads resulting from the maneuvers specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, with— ( 1 ) Unbalanced aerodynamic moments about the center of gravity which the aircraft reacts to in a rational or conservative manner considering the principal masses furnishing the reacting inertia forces; and
( 2 ) Maximum main rotor speed.
( b ) To produce the load required in paragraph (a) of this section, in unaccelerated flight with zero yaw, at forward speeds from zero up to 0.6 VNE— ( 1 ) Displace the cockpit directional control suddenly to the maximum deflection limited by the control stops or by the maximum pilot force specified in § 29.397(a);
( 2 ) Attain a resulting sideslip angle or 90°, whichever is less; and
( 3 ) Return the directional control suddenly to neutral.
( c ) To produce the load required in paragraph (a) of the section, in unaccelerated flight with zero yaw, at forward speeds from 0.6 VNE up to VNE or VH, whichever is less— ( 1 ) Displace the cockpit directional control suddenly to the maximum deflection limited by the control stops or by the maximum pilot force specified in § 29.397(a);
( 2 ) Attain a resulting sideslip angle or 15°, whichever is less, at the lesser speed of VNE or VH;
( 3 ) Vary the sideslip angles of paragraphs (b)(2) and (c)(2) of this section directly with speed; and
( 4 ) Return the directional control suddenly to neutral.
[Amdt. 29-26, 55 FR 8002, Mar. 6, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 29-41, 62 FR 46173, Aug. 29, 1997]
From: Fitzgerald, Kristin

To: Fitzgerald, Kristin Subject: FW: Walmart data - Coumadin

Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:47:52 PM

Attachments: warfarin Summary with weights.xls

From: Lisa Lauer/DC/USEPA/US
To: Charlotte Mooney/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kristin Fitzgerald/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jessica Young/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,
Date: 01/14/2011 03:50 PM Subject: Fw: Walmart data - Coumadin

-----Forwarded by Lisa Lauer/DC/USEPA/US on 01/14/2011 03:52PM -----
To: Lisa Lauer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: Richard Leahy - Legal < Richard.Leahy@walmartlegal.com > Date: 01/14/2011 03:41PM Subject: Walmart data - Coumadin

(See attached file: warfarin Summary with weights.xls)

Lisa: Pursuant to our recent conference call attached please find the data we gathered regarding the issue of whether "empty" plastic pill bottles should be considered P-waste when

discarded. We did the sampling following the Florida protocol that you are familiar with. The results clearly show that less than .3% Coumadin is "present" in the container when compared to the original amount of Coumadin in the bottle when full. That is our understanding of how Florida did the analysis. However, the data also indicates how much Coumadin is "present" compared to the total weight of the waste, i.e., the discarded or recycled plastic bottle itself.

Those results are also clearly below the .3% standard that defines whether a Coumadin waste

is a P or U listed waste. Based on these results, the bottles should be RCRA empty - U 248

containers.

As we discussed during our call there a number of other viable alternative rationales why the bottles should not be considered P waste but if EPA agrees that this data indicates the bottles are RCA empty - U 248 containers, then those other rationales may become moot. We are eager to have further discussions regarding this issue (and also would welcome further discussion about the Universal Waste Pharmaceutical Rule). Feel free to contact me any time.

If you have any questions regarding the data please let me know.

Ps: one key point regarding the data is that each "result" is based on a composite from 3-4

bottles. So the amounts indicated need to be divided by 3 or 4 to get individual bottle results. The attachment explains this point but if you miss it the results will seem high in terms of residue amounts, pill weights, and bottle weights.

Richard Leahy Associate General Counsel Phone 479-277-8262, Fax 479-277-5991 richard.leahy@walmartlegal.comWalmart
508 Southwest 8th Street Bentonville, AR 72716-0505 Save money. Live better.



### (See attached file: warfarin Summary with weights.xls)
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24735-2 Filed:07/13/23 Entered:07/13/23 18:55:46 Desc:

Exhibit Exhibit 2 - USPS Certified Mail Receipt Page 1 of 1
Summary of Analytical Results

662 - April 2012

Sample ID 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB

Date 4/2/12 4/9/12 4/16/12 4/23/12 4/30/12

Top (ft) 0 0 0 0 0

Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) 0 0 0 0 0

Analyte units Diss. (D) Duplicate # 1 1 1 1 1

PFOA ug/L T 2.26 2.28 1.36 1.69 1.73

ug/L = micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb)

ND = not detected (shown as <LOD)

NQ = not quantifiable (shown as <LOQ)

ND<LOD<NQ<LOQ

LOD - limit of detection

LOQ = limit of quantification

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results 

 represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 4/2/12.

 Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample

 collected on 4/2/12 represents the average of lab duplicate results.

 The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072.

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid

ug/L = micrograms per Liter

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1

09000064810e6d84.xlsx:Sheet1

8/21/2012 2:11 PM
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Rushing III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  James C. Rushing III

James C. Rushing III,

Chief Financial Officer



Date:  August 14, 2007







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 25.1321 Arrangement and visibility. ( a ) Each flight, navigation, and powerplant instrument for use by any pilot must be plainly visible to him from his station with the minimum practicable deviation from his normal position and line of vision when he is looking forward along the flight path.
( b ) The flight instruments required by § 25.1303 must be grouped on the instrument panel and centered as nearly as practicable about the vertical plane of the pilot's forward vision. In addition— ( 1 ) The instrument that most effectively indicates attitude must be on the panel in the top center position;
( 2 ) The instrument that most effectively indicates airspeed must be adjacent to and directly to the left of the instrument in the top center position:
( 3 ) The instrument that most effectively indicates altitude must be adjacent to and directly to the right of the instrument in the top center position; and
( 4 ) The instrument that most effectively indicates direction of flight must be adjacent to and directly below the instrument in the top center position.
( c ) Required powerplant instruments must be closely grouped on the instrument panel. In addition— ( 1 ) The location of identical powerplant instruments for the engines must prevent confusion as to which engine each instrument relates; and
( 2 ) Powerplant instruments vital to the safe operation of the airplane must be plainly visible to the appropriate crewmembers.
( d ) Instrument panel vibration may not damage or impair the accuracy of any instrument.
( e ) If a visual indicator is provided to indicate malfunction of an instrument, it must be effective under all probable cockpit lighting conditions.
[Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5679, Apr. 8, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 25-41, 42 FR 36970, July 18, 1977]
§ 29.63 Takeoff: Category B. The horizontal distance required to take off and climb over a 50-foot obstacle must be established with the most unfavorable center of gravity. The takeoff may be begun in any manner if— ( a ) The takeoff surface is defined;
( b ) Adequate safeguards are maintained to ensure proper center of gravity and control positions; and
( c ) A landing can be made safely at any point along the flight path if an engine fails.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-12, 41 FR 55471, Dec. 20, 1976]
#  Loyalty Day, 2000

In the Declaration of Independence and in the Constitution, our Nation's founders first articulated the enduring ideals that have sustained our democracy—freedom, self-determination, justice, and equality. Each year we set aside this special day to reaffirm our allegiance to those ideals and to our beloved country.

The power and promise of our country's principles moved men and women throughout the American colonies to declare their allegiance to a new country and a new form of government that respected the rights of the individual. Throughout the decades, millions of immigrants drawn to America's freedom proved their loyalty to their adopted Nation in the words of the oath of citizenship and in their daily lives—working hard, striving to build a better future for their families and communities, serving in our Armed Forces, upholding our laws, and participating in our democracy.

Other Americans have showed their loyalty by courageously challenging our Nation to live up to its ideals. We owe a profound debt to the heroes and visionaries who opposed slavery, reformed labor practices, won the right to vote for women, marched for civil rights, and spoke out with conscience and conviction whenever we have failed to uphold the highest standards of freedom and justice.

We find perhaps the strongest and most moving evidence of loyalty to America in the service and sacrifice of our men and women in uniform. From the War of Independence to today's peacekeeping missions around the world, generations of Americans have shown their allegiance by defending our Nation against tyrants and terrorists, protecting our national interests wherever they are threatened, and promoting our values across the globe.

On this first Loyalty Day of the 21st century, all Americans should give thanks that we live in a Nation that inspires such fidelity. And we should remember with pride the loyal patriots who have gone before us, whose character and efforts built America, preserved it in times of peril, and gave life to our founders' dreams.

Recognizing the importance of loyalty to the continued strength of our country and success of our democracy, the Congress, by Public Law 85-529, has designated May 1 of each year as “Loyalty Day.”

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 1, 2000, as Loyalty Day. I urge all Americans to recall the valor and selflessness of all those who made this Nation worthy of our love and loyalty and to express our own loyalty through appropriate patriotic programs, ceremonies, and activities. I also call upon Government officials to display the flag of the United States in support of this national observance.                          ( print page 25828)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fourth. 

[FR Doc. 00-11142

Billing code 3195-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐x 

In re:                  PROMESA  

                  Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND  

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

  as representative of   

                  No. 17 BK 3283‐LTS  

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.,                 (Jointly Administered) 

      Debtors.1

  

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐x 

ORDER 

  This matter is before the Court on the second supplemental joint status report of 

Movants and Respondents (Dkt. No. 2899) (the “Second Status Report”) related to the Joint 

Motion by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL‐CIO 

(AFSCME), American Federation of Teachers, AFL‐CIO (AFT), International Union, United 

Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL‐CIO (UAW), and 

Service Employees International Union (SEIU) for an Order Authorizing Discovery Under 

Bankruptcy Rule 2004 (Dkt. No. 2595) (the “Motion”).  As requested, the parties to the Motion 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the 

last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284‐LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees 

Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3566‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power 

Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) 

(Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

   

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2902 Filed:04/13/18 Entered:04/13/18 18:32:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 

shall supplement the Second Status Report on or before April 27, 2018.   

This order resolves Dkt. No. 2899. 

SO ORDERED.           

/ s / Judith Gail Dein               

Judith Gail Dein 

              United States Magistrate Judge  

DATED: April 13, 2018 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2902 Filed:04/13/18 Entered:04/13/18 18:32:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re: )

)

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND )

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, ) PROMESA

as representative of ) Title III

)

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO )

et al., ) Case No. 3:17-03283

Debtors1 ) (LTS)

------------------------------------------------------------------------)

In re: )

)

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND ) PROMESA

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, ) Title III

as representative of )

) Case No. 3:17-03566 

THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ) (LTS)

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE )

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, )

)

Debtor )

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - )

COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CRÉDITO VEGABAJEÑA’S INFORMATIVE 

MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURES 

FOR ATTENDANCE – NOVEMBER 7-8, 2018, OMNIBUS HEARING

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

 

1 The Debtors in this Title III case are: (i) The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankr. Case No. 17-bk-3283-LTS); (ii) The Employees Retirement System of the Govt. of 

the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankr. Case No. 17-bk-3566-LTS); (iii) Puerto Rico 

Sales Tax Financing Corporation (Bankr. Case No. 17-bk-3284-LTS); (iv) Puerto Rico 

Highways and Transportation Authority (Bankr.Case No. 17-bk-3567-LTS); and (v) 

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (Bankr. Case No. 17-bk-4780-LTS). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4129 Filed:10/31/18 Entered:10/31/18 17:53:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Cooperativa A/C Vegabajeña’s Informative Motion, etc. 2

 Comes Now, secured creditor Cooperativa de Ahorro y Crédito Vegabajeña,

("Cooperativa"), represented by its undersigned attorneys and respectfully states, alleges

and prays:

As commanded by the Court’s Order (ECF-4103), it is hereby informed that 

undersigned counsel, Carlos A. Quilichini Paz, will appear at the Omnibus Hearing, in 

San Juan, P.R., to speak and be heard on behalf of Cooperativa regarding its Motion to 

Lift Stay (Case No. 17 BK 3283, ECF-4011) – (Case No. 17 BK 3566 – ECF–329).

NOTICE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this date I filed a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Cooperativa de Ahorro y Crédito Vegabajeña’s Informative Motion, etc., with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all 

CM/ECF participants, and by USPS to the U.S. Trustee.

In San Juan, P.R, this 31st day of October 2018.

 /s/ Carlos A. Quilichini Paz

USDCPR 120906

Jessica M. Quilichini Ortíz

USDCPR 223803

Attorneys for Cooperativa de

Ahorro y Crédito Vegabajeña

Post Office Box 9020895

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00902-0895

Telephone: (787) 729-1720

Facsimile: (787) 724-6000

Email: quilichinipazc@microjuris.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4129 Filed:10/31/18 Entered:10/31/18 17:53:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




The Board
of Directors


ICON
plc




Dear
Sirs:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-152802) of ICON plc of our reports dated
February 19, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of ICON
plc as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 Annual
Report on Form 20-F of ICON plc.




Our
report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the Company’s adoption
of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertain Income
Taxes, as of January 1, 2007 and its adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 123(R), Share Based Payments, as of
January 1, 2006.




/s/
KPMG




KPMG


Chartered
Accountants


Dublin,
Ireland


March 31,
2009
§ 13.41 Separation of functions and prohibition on ex parte communications. ( a ) *Separation of powers.* The hearing officer independently exercises the powers under this subpart in a manner conducive to justice and the proper dispatch of business. The hearing officer must not participate in any appeal to the Administrator.
( b ) *Ex parte communications.* ( 1 ) No substantive ex parte communications between the hearing officer and any party are permitted.
( 2 ) A hearing, conference, or other event scheduled with prior notice will not constitute ex parte communication prohibited by this section. A hearing, conference, or other event scheduled with prior notice, may proceed in the hearing officer's sole discretion if a party fails to appear, respond, or otherwise participate, and will not constitute an ex parte communication prohibited by this section.
( 3 ) For an appeal to the Administrator under this subpart, FAA attorneys representing the complainant must not advise the Administrator or engage in any ex parte communications with the Administrator or his advisors.