alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 230,849
<CASH>                                          40,932
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              29,839
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           4,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 356,402
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                124,362
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             30,402
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 31,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   356,402
<PREMIUMS>                                      41,433
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              3,149
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 641
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   8,694
<BENEFITS>                                      30,381
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     12,166
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             5,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,183
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,949
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 88 (Friday, May 5, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 26162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11330]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 16 and 900

[Docket No. 99N-4578]
RIN 0910-AB98


State Certification of Mammography Facilities; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a 
proposed rule that appeared in the Federal Register of March 30, 2000 
(65 FR 16847). The document proposes to implement the ``States as 
certifiers provisions'' of the Mammography Quality Standards Act of 
1992 (the MQSA). In the March 30, 2000, proposed rule, there were two 
incorrect references to the provisions of the MQSA being implemented. 
This document corrects those errors.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth A. Fischer, Center for Devices 
and Radiological Health (HFZ-240), Food and Drug Administration, 1350 
Piccard Dr., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-594-3332, FAX 301-594-3306.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 00-7653, appearing on page 16847 
in the Federal Register of March 30, 2000, the following corrections 
are made:
    1. On page 16847, in the first column, under the SUMMARY, in line 
3, ``patient notification'' is corrected to read ``States as 
certifiers''.
    2. On page 16848, in the first column, the heading in section D, 
``The Patient Notification Provisions'' is corrected to read ``The 
States as Certifiers Provisions''.

    Dated: April 15, 2000.
Linda S. Kahan,
Deputy Director for Regulations Policy, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 00-11330 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
June 25, 2015

MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2008

- 0699

On June 1 8 , 2015, representatives of EPA attended a meeting with representatives of NAM and

NERA

. The meeting was held by videoconference. Attendees discussed the ozone National

Ambient Air Quality Standards rulemaking. NERA provided meeting materials and are attached

.

The following is a list of attendees and their affiliation :

Name Affiliation

Joel Visser Sidley Austin

Catherine Karen Sidley Austin

Greg Beutelser National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)

Ross Elsenbert NAM

A nne Smith NERA Economic Consulting

Sharon Cooperstein EPA/Office of Policy (OP)

Al McGartland EPA/OP

Elizabeth Kopits EPA/OP

Janet McCabe EPA Office of Air and Radiation

Steve Page EPA /Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

(OAQPS)

Mike Koerber EPA/OAQPS

Martha Keating EPA/OAQPS

Robin Langdon EPA/OAQPS

Karen Wesson EPA/OAQPS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- Xerox Corporation Under Contract No. GS925F-0062L

D.O. No. W91QVI-10-F-0001 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59135

Donald J. Walsh, Esq.

Offit Kurman, P.A. Owings Mills, MD Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney CPT Ahsan M. Nasar, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 1April 2015

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59135, Appeal ofXerox Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ron Howell, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                        Date: May 15, 2009

                                        \s\ Ron Howell
                                        --------------
                                        Ron Howell
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.127 Tests: aircraft. ( a ) Each person manufacturing aircraft under a type certificate must establish an approved production flight test procedure and flight check-off form, and in accordance with that form, flight test each aircraft produced.
( b ) Each production flight test procedure must include the following: ( 1 ) An operational check of the trim, controllability, or other flight characteristics to establish that the production aircraft has the same range and degree of control as the prototype aircraft.
( 2 ) An operational check of each part or system operated by the crew while in flight to establish that, during flight, instrument readings are within normal range.
( 3 ) A determination that all instruments are properly marked, and that all placards and required flight manuals are installed after flight test.
( 4 ) A check of the operational characteristics of the aircraft on the ground.
( 5 ) A check on any other items peculiar to the aircraft being tested that can best be done during the ground or flight operation of the aircraft.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10853]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Announcement of Subsistence Resource Commission Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Announcement of Subsistence Resource Commission meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Superintendent of Gates of the Arctic National Park and 
Preserve and the Chairperson of the Subsistence Resource Commission for 
Gates of the Arctic National Park announce a forthcoming meeting of the 
Gates of the Arctic National Park Subsistence Resource Commission. The 
following agenda items will be discussed:

(1) Call to order.
(2) Roll call.
(3) Approval of summary of meeting minutes for November 15-17,1999 
meeting in Fairbanks.
(4) Review agenda.
(5) Superintendent's introductions of guests and staff and review of 
Commission function and purpose.
(6) Superintendent's Management/Research Report Summary.
    a. Administration and management.
    b. Park operations.
    c. Resource management.
    d. Subsistence program.
(7) Public and agency comments.
(8) Old Business.
    a. Draft Subsistence Management Plan-review of public comments.
(9) New Business
    a. Review Federal Subsistence Board and Regional Advisory Council 
actions.
    b. Federal Subsistence Fisheries Management.
    c. SRC Work Session (Draft letters/updates Subsistence Management 
Plan--if necessary).
(10) Set time and place of next SRC meeting.
(11) Adjournment.

DATES: The meeting will be held from 1:30 p.m. until 5 p.m. on Tuesday 
May 9, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Wednesday May 10, and 8:30 a.m. to noon 
on Thursday May 11, 2000.

LOCATION: The meeting will be held at the IRA building in Ambler, 
Alaska

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Mow, 201 First Avenue, Doyon 
Bldg., Fairbanks, Alaska 99701. Phone (907) 456-0578.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Subsistence Resource Commissions are 
authorized under Title VIII, section 808, of the Alaska National 
Interest Lands Conservation Act, Public Law 96-487 and operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committees Act.

Robert D. Barbee,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 00-10853 Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
SCPR-12-0001122

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

IN RE BURGESS A. DELL-WILSON, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C

. J
. , N a k a y a m a , A c o b a , M c K e n n a , a n d P o l l a c k , J J
. )

Upon consideration of Petitioner Burgess A. DellWilson’s petition to resign and surrender her license to practice law in the State of Hawai # i, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai # i (RSCH), and of the affidavits and exhibits in support thereof,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted nunc pro tunc to December 31, 2012.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and record requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the name of Petitioner Burgess A. Dell-Wilson, attorney number 5300, from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai # i, effective with the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, January 9, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPR-12-0001122 09-JAN-2013 08:32 AM
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-09-00549- CV

Sus ie Alvestr a F lem ing, App ellant

v. Benny L arry F lem ing, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 169 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 222 ,540 -C, H ONO RAB LE GORDO N G. ADAMS, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Susie Alvestra Fleming ’s brief is overdue
. Her brief was orig inally due Dec ember 2, 2009. After a suppl emental clerk’s recor d was fi l ed an d appellant’ s motion to extend time to file the brief was g rante d, her brief wa s d u e J an u ary 20, 2010. This Court g rante d a second motion, extending the due date to Fe bruar y 26, 2010. This Court g rante d a third motion, extending the due date to Marc h 29, 2010. When no brief was filed, this Court’s cler k notified the parties that the brief
was ove rdue by

letter da ted April 23, 2010. The letter wa rned tha t this appeal could be dismiss ed for want of prosecution if no brief or expl an at i o n fo r t he lateness of t he brief was filed by May 3,2010. To date, appellant has not filed an explanation, furt h er m o t i o n to extend, or a brief. This

appea l is dism issed for wa nt of prosec ution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Waldrop Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: Jul y

8, 2010

2
§ 27.695 Power boost and power-operated control system. ( a ) If a power boost or power-operated control system is used, an alternate system must be immediately available that allows continued safe flight and landing in the event of— ( 1 ) Any single failure in the power portion of the system; or
( 2 ) The failure of all engines.
( b ) Each alternate system may be a duplicate power portion or a manually operated mechanical system. The power portion includes the power source (such as hydraulic pumps), and such items as valves, lines, and actuators.
( c ) The failure of mechanical parts (such as piston rods and links), and the jamming of power cylinders, must be considered unless they are extremely improbable.
§ 25.685 Control system details. ( a ) Each detail of each control system must be designed and installed to prevent jamming, chafing, and interference from cargo, passengers, loose objects, or the freezing of moisture.
( b ) There must be means in the cockpit to prevent the entry of foreign objects into places where they would jam the system.
( c ) There must be means to prevent the slapping of cables or tubes against other parts.
( d ) Sections 25.689 and 25.693 apply to cable systems and joints.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-38, 41 FR 55466, Dec. 20, 1976]
§ 29.561 General. ( a ) The rotorcraft, although it may be damaged in emergency landing conditions on land or water, must be designed as prescribed in this section to protect the occupants under those conditions.
( b ) The structure must be designed to give each occupant every reasonable chance of escaping serious injury in a crash landing when— ( 1 ) Proper use is made of seats, belts, and other safety design provisions;
( 2 ) The wheels are retracted (where applicable); and
( 3 ) Each occupant and each item of mass inside the cabin that could injure an occupant is restrained when subjected to the following ultimate inertial load factors relative to the surrounding structure: ( i ) Upward—4g.
( ii ) Forward—16g.
( iii ) Sideward—8g.
( iv ) Downward—20g, after the intended displacement of the seat device.
( v ) Rearward—1.5g.
( c ) The supporting structure must be designed to restrain under any ultimate inertial load factor up to those specified in this paragraph, any item of mass above and/or behind the crew and passenger compartment that could injure an occupant if it came loose in an emergency landing. Items of mass to be considered include, but are not limited to, rotors, transmission, and engines. The items of mass must be restrained for the following ultimate inertial load factors: ( 1 ) Upward—1.5g.
( 2 ) Forward—12g.
( 3 ) Sideward—6g.
( 4 ) Downward—12g.
( 5 ) Rearward—1.5g.
( d ) Any fuselage structure in the area of internal fuel tanks below the passenger floor level must be designed to resist the following ultimate inertial factors and loads, and to protect the fuel tanks from rupture, if rupture is likely when those loads are applied to that area: ( 1 ) Upward—1.5g.
( 2 ) Forward—4.0g.
( 3 ) Sideward—2.0g.
( 4 ) Downward—4.0g.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-29, 54 FR 47319, Nov. 13, 1989; Amdt. 29-38, 61 FR 10438, Mar. 13, 1996]
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.63 Other types of governing tariffs.

Subject to approval of the Department, carriers may publish other types of governing tariffs not specified in this subpart, such as routing guides.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3984 

To provide that payments for waste and recycling collection services are 

allowable expenses under the paycheck protection program and eligible 

for loan forgiveness under the CARES Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2020 

Mr. CARPER (for himself, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To provide that payments for waste and recycling collection 

services are allowable expenses under the paycheck protection program and eligible for loan forgiveness under 

the CARES Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF WASTE AND RECYCLING COL4 LECTION SERVICES. 

5 (a) ALLOWABLE USE OF PPP LOAN.—Section 

6 7(a)(36)(F)(i) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

7 636(a)(36)(F)(i)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3984 IS

1 (1) in subclause (VI), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in subclause (VII), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’ and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(VIII) payments for waste or 

7 recycling collection services.’’. 

8 (b) LOAN FORGIVENESS.—Section 1106 of the 

9 CARES Act (Public Law 116–136) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)— 

11 (A) in paragraph (7)— 

12 (i) in subparagraph (C), by striking 

13 ‘‘and’’ at the end; and 

14 (ii) by adding at the end the fol15 lowing: 

16 ‘‘(E) covered waste and recycling collection 

17 services payments;’’; 

18 (B) in paragraph (8), by striking the pe19 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

20 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(9) the term ‘covered waste or recycling collec22 tion service payment’ means a payment for a waste 

23 or recycling collection service for which service began 

24 before February 15, 2020.’’; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3984 IS

1 (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(5) Any covered waste or recycling collection 

4 service payment.’’; 

5 (3) in subsection (d)(8), by inserting ‘‘any cov6 ered waste or recycling collection service payment,’’ 

7 after ‘‘rent obligation,’’; 

8 (4) in subsection (e)— 

9 (A) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘covered 

10 waste or recycling collection service payments,’’ 

11 after ‘‘lease obligations,’’; and 

12 (B) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘make 

13 covered waste or recycling collection service 

14 payments,’’ after ‘‘rent obligation,’’; and 

15 (5) in subsection (h), by inserting ‘‘covered 

16 waste or recycling collection service payments,’’ after 

17 ‘‘lease obligations,’’ each place that term appears. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT ON REMAND

Tory Levon Kirk, * From the Criminal District 

Court No. 5 of Dallas County,

Trial Court No. F-0962440-L.

Vs. No. 11-13-00130-CR * September 24, 2015

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

                              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

                              RAILWORKS CORPORATION

                             RATIO OF FIXED CHARGES
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      2001             2000           1999           1998           1997
                                                   ----------       ---------       --------      ---------       -------
<S>                                                <C>              <C>             <C>           <C>             <C>
Income (loss) from continuing
operations                                         $ (140,700)      $ (59,995)      $ 20,086      $ (12,847)      $ 1,428

Add (deduct):
         Income Tax                                     4,075           2,875         11,063          1,472         1,198
                                                   ----------       ---------       --------      ---------       -------

         Sub-total                                   (136,625)        (57,120)        31,149        (11,375)        2,626

Interest and other financial
charges                                                32,373          37,292         19,781          2,334         1,761

Amortization of debt expense and
discount accretion related to all
indebtedness                                            1,797           1,695            972            224             0

Interest factor attributable to
rentals                                                 2,950           1,963          1,627            762           671
                                                   ----------       ---------       --------      ---------       -------

Earnings as adjusted                               $  (99,505)      $ (16,170)      $ 53,529      $  (8,055)      $ 5,058

Fixed charges from above                           $   37,120       $  40,950       $ 22,380      $   3,320       $ 2,432

Ratio of earnings, as adjusted,
to total fixed charges                                   *               *               2.4            *             2.1
</TABLE>


*        Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $136,625 in 2001,
         $57,120 in 2000 and $11,375 in 1998.


                                       41
#### § 25.693 Joints.

Control system joints (in push-pull systems) that are subject to angular motion, except those in ball and roller bearing systems, must have a special factor of safety of not less than 3.33 with respect to the ultimate bearing strength of the softest material used as a bearing. This factor may be reduced to 2.0 for joints in cable control systems. For ball or roller bearings, the approved ratings may not be exceeded.

[Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29777, July 20, 1990]