alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT I 

Detailed Expense Records for Segal Consulting 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3537-9 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 15:58:50 Desc:

Exhibit I Page 1 of 2
ìÇ Segal Consulting

OfficialGommittee of Retirees in the

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

c/o Jenner and Block LLP

Client Number: L4812

TRAVEL EXPENSES

2/6/2OL8 Jacob Libauskas airfare

2/612018 Jacob Libauskas additional airfare fees

2/6l21t8 Matt Strom airfare

TOTAT FOR: FIIGHTS

2/6/2018 Matt Strom Breakfast

2/6/2Ot8 Matt Strom food at airport

2/612018 Matt Strom and Jacob Libauskas dinner

2/7120t8 Matt Strom Breakfast

2/7l2OL8 Matt Strom and Jacob Libauskas lunch

TOTAT FOR: MEALS

2/612018 Jacob Libauskas UBER to airport

2/6l2OL8 Matt Strom UBER to airport

2/6/2OL8 Matt Strom Taxito Hotel

2/8/2OL8 Jacob Libauskas UBER to home

2/8/20L8 Matt Strom UBER to home

TOTAL FOR: TAXI

2/6/20L8 Jacob Libauskas hotel

2/6/20t8 Matt Strom hotel

TOTAL FOR: HOTEL

Total Disbursements

Szsz.go

Ss¿.ag

S1,034.58

S1,846.71

5o.og

$z.ss

54s.44

5L2.27

542.t3

$tt4.o2

540.4S

sse.06

$27.00

s32.33

546.47

s 20s.34

s83o.3o

5L,019.42

5 1,849.72

S 4,015.79

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3537-9 Filed:07/16/18 Entered:07/16/18 15:58:50 Desc:

Exhibit I Page 2 of 2
§ 258.3 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Air transportation* has the meaning ascribed to it in 49 U.S.C. 40102(5).
( b ) *Carrier* means any air carrier or foreign air carrier as defined in 49 U.S.C. 40102(2) or 49 U.S.C. 40102(21), respectively, that engages directly in scheduled passenger air transportation.
( c ) *Change-of-gauge service* means a service that requires a change of aircraft en route but has only a single flight number.
( d ) *Ticket agent* has the meaning ascribed to it in 49 U.S.C. 40102(a)(45).
[64 FR 12860, Mar. 15, 1999, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15933, Apr. 16, 2019]
Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Unfunded Supplemental Benefit Plan



 
EXHIBIT 10.3

 
R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY

 
APPROVAL 
 
BY 
VICE PRESIDENT, COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 
 
ADOPTING 
 
AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO 
 
to the 
JANUARY 1, 1989 Restatement 
of the 
 
R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY 
UNFUNDED SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN 
 
Pursuant to Section 3.12 of the By-Laws of R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company (the “Company”) and authority delegated pursuant
thereto by the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, the undersigned Vice President, Compensation and Employee Benefits (the “Vice President”) hereby adopts the document attached hereto entitled
“Amendment Number Two to the January 1, 1989 Restatement of the R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company Unfunded Supplemental Benefit Plan.” 
 
Executed by the Vice President this 18 day of April, 2000. 
 
 

	
	

	 Jack McEnery
 Vice President, Compensation and Employee Benefits



 
 
 







R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY 
 
AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO 
 
to the 
January 1, 1989 Restatement 
of the 
 
R.
R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY 
UNFUNDED SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN 
 
Allowing Administrator to Determine Time and Form of Certain
Payments 
 
WHEREAS, R. R. Donnelley & Sons
Company (the “Company”) maintains for the benefit of certain of its employees and certain employees of its participating subsidiaries the R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company Unfunded Supplemental Benefit Plan (the “Plan”);

 
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan
to liberalize the circumstances under which the Plan Administrator may direct that a Member will receive a lump sum distribution of his benefit under the Plan; and 
 
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan, the Company has the right to amend the Plan. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment in Section
10 of the Plan, effective March 1, 1999, the Plan is hereby amended in the following respects: 
 
1. The proviso in the first sentence of Section 8 is amended by adding the following parenthetical after the term “Member” where such term first appears in such proviso: 
 
(or a person treated as a Member pursuant to
the penultimate and the ultimate sentences of this Section 8) 
 
2. A new third sentence is added to Section 8 between the existing second and third sentences which reads as follows: 
 
In the case of a person who has not made an election (a deferred annuitant under the Qualified Plan or a person treated as
a deferred annuitant under the Qualified Plan pursuant to the penultimate and the ultimate sentences of this Section 8), the form of payment and commencement date of the Member’s benefit shall be determined by the Plan Administrator in his or
her sole discretion. 
 
3. The ultimate sentence of
Section 8 is hereby amended by deleting the word “not” where it appears therein and replacing it with “such person may or may not be”.
180920 ORDER RE JOINT STATUS REPORT (MANDRY MERCADO).DOCX VERSION SEPTEMBER 20, 2018 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

----------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: PROMESA 

 Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered) 

et al., 

 Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x 

ORDER REGARDING JOINT STATUS REPORT (DOCKET ENTRY NO. 3948)

The Court has received and reviewed the Joint Status Report in Compliance with 

Order Regarding Correspondence Received by the Court on August 27, 2018 (Docket Entry No. 

3948 in Case No. 17-3283, the “Status Report”) filed by the Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and 

Financial Advisory Authority (“AAFAF”) and Ms. María E. Vicéns Rivera. In light of the 

information provided by AAFAF and Ms. Vicéns Rivera in the Status Report, and for the 

avoidance of doubt, all relief sought by Mr. Javier Mandry Mercado via his correspondence to 

the Court dated August 27, 2018, is hereby denied. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 20, 2018 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN 

 United States District Judge 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). 

(Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations.) 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3952 Filed:09/20/18 Entered:09/20/18 12:13:11 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-3031
In the Matter of: EDWARD RICHMAN; ILENE H. RICHMAN, Debtors.

_________________________ EDWARD RICHMAN; ILENE H. RICHMAN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus GALLAND, KHARASCH, MORSE & GARFINKLE, PC, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1854-AW, BK-92-13241-SD) Argued: September 25, 1996 Decided: December 13, 1996 Before ERVIN and HALL, Circuit Judges, and HALLANAN, United Stated District Judge for the Southern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation. Affirmed by unpublished opinion. Judge Hallanan wrote the opinion, in which Judge Ervin and Judge Hall joined.2 ARGUED: John G. Gill, Jr., GILL & SIPPEL, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellants. Helle Rung Weeke, GALLAND, KHARASCH, MORSE & GARFINKLE, P.C., Washington, D.C. for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert H. Morse, Robert D. Roseman, GALLAND, KHARASCH, MORSE & GARFINKLE, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

HALLANAN, District Judge: Because in this case the district court sat as an appellate court in bankruptcy, our review of the district court's decision is plenary. In re Varat Enters., Inc. , 81 F.3d 1310, 1316 (4th Cir. 1996); In re Stanley, 66 F.3d 664, 667 (4th Cir. 1995). With this in mind, after considering the record, the briefs submitted by theparties, and the oral argument of counsel, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re Richman , Civil Action No. AW-95- 1854 (D. Md. filed October 23, 1995).

AFFIRMED
[NAME OF ORDER] VERSION [DATE] 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF URGENT MOTION REQUESTING THE LIFT OF STAY

The Court has received and reviewed the Urgent Motion Requesting the Lift of 

Stay (the “Motion”) filed by Michael Meléndez (the “Movant”). (Docket Entry No. 3477.) 

Opposition papers to the Motion must be filed by July 25, 2018. Movant’s reply papers must be 

filed by August 1, 2018. The Court will thereafter take the Motion on submission, unless a party 

thereto requests a hearing.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 11, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation 

(“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 

17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System 

of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power 

Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3479 Filed:07/11/18 Entered:07/11/18 10:23:39 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3190-1 Filed:05/30/18 Entered:05/30/18 17:23:00 Desc:Exhibit Promesa Cover Sheet Page 1 of 2Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3190-1 Filed:05/30/18 Entered:05/30/18 17:23:00 Desc:Exhibit Promesa Cover Sheet Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                              SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Vivian Nehls her true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution, for her
and in her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments, including post effective amendments, to this Form 10-QSB, and to
file the same with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting such
attorney-in-fact the full power and authority to and perform each and every act
and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully
and to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact may lawfully do or cause
to be done by virtue hereof.

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Form
10-QSB has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the
date indicated.

By:     /s/ Netta Girard
        -------------------------
        Netta Girard
        November 13, 2000
Rights-of-Way Corridors within the

Billings Field Office Planning Area

Alternative C

Map 77

£¤

Belfry

^_

^_Warren

Frannie

^_

T7ST8S

R22E Montana R100W Wyoming

T

58NT

57N

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

0 0.45 0.9 1.8 2.7 3.6

Miles

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Map scale 1:130,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Legend

State Border

 Corridors

Highway

Roads

^_ Towns

Bureau of Land Management

Bureau of Reclamation

Division of State Lands

U.S. Forest Service

Water

Private 

Public Lands Survey System

310

R24E

R98W
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.170 Applicability of the subpart. ( a ) Every air carrier and foreign air carrier shall file its international passenger fares tariffs consistent with the provisions of this subpart, and part 221 generally. Additionally, any air carrier and any foreign air carrier may file its international passenger rules tariffs electronically in machine-readable form as an alternative to the filing of printed paper tariffs as provided for elsewhere in part 221. This subpart applies to all carriers and tariff publishing agents and may be used by either if the carrier or agent complies with the provisions of subpart R. Any carrier or agent that files electronically under this subpart must transmit to the Department the remainder of the tariff in a form consistent with part 221, Subparts A through Q, on the same day that the electronic tariff would be deemed received under § 221.190(b).
( b ) To the extent that subpart R is inconsistent with the remainder of part 221, subpart R shall govern the filing of electronic tariffs. In all other respects, part 221 remains in full force and effect.
#### N. Goldring, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. Ealey White, *Defendant in Error.*

1. Where a person who is not careless, but who is properly walking along or across a street, is injured by an automobile rapidly and negligently driven upon him before he has a reasonable opportunity to escape, the party operating or driving the automobile is liable in damages for the injuries proximately caused by the negligence.

2. Evidence examined and found sufficient to support the verdict.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*John G.*Avery, for Plaintiff in Error;

*J. P. St olees,*and *R. P.*Reese, for Defendant in Error.

Shackleford, J.

— Ealey White brought an action against N. Goldring in which he sought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of the defendant in running against him, the plaintiff, and striking him with his automibile, which was being operated by the defendant in a street in the City of Pensacola, Florida. Ro point is made on the pleadings. The plaintiff laid his damages at $10,000.00 and recovered a judgment for $250.00, which the defendant has brought here for review by writ of error.

The principle assignments urged before us is the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. We do not think that this assignment has been sustained. See *163the discussion in Geo. E. Wood Lumber Co. v. Gipson, decided this day. We are further of the opinion that this case is ruled by Mugge v. Brachin, decided here at the present term, wherein we held that “Where a person who is not careless, but who is properly walking along or across a street, is injured by a vehicle rapidly and negligently driven upon him before he has reasonable opportunity to escape, the party so driving the vehicle is liable in damages for injuries proximately caused by the negligence.” We would also refer to Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co., 62 Fla. 166, 57 South. Rep. 233. We have considered all the assignments argued before us and, no reversible error having been made to appear, are of tifre opinion that the judgment must be affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Taylor, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.
§ 27.731 Wheels. ( a ) Each landing gear wheel must be approved.
( b ) The maximum static load rating of each wheel may not be less than the corresponding static ground reaction with— ( 1 ) Maximum weight; and
( 2 ) Critical center of gravity.
( c ) The maximum limit load rating of each wheel must equal or exceed the maximum radial limit load determined under the applicable ground load requirements of this part.
April 3 , 2015

To: expartecommunication s @hq.doe.gov (sent via email)

Re: Memorandum Summarizing Ex Parte Communication

On March 30, 2015 , representatives of the American Gas Association (AGA) met with officials and staff of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to discuss the notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) on minimum energy efficiency standards for residential natur al gas furnaces. The purpose of the meeting was to reiterate concerns raised by AGA at the March 27 th public hearing on the proposed rule held at DOE headquarters. AGA’s concerns are described in the summary statement submitted to DOE in advance of the M arch 27 th hearing, and are attached here.

The following persons attended the meeting: Representing the Department of Energy

 Franklin Orr

 David Danielson

 Kathleen Hogan

 Dan Cohen

 Jonathan Levy

Representing the American Gas Association

 David McCurdy

 Kathryn Clay

Documents review ed and discussed at the meeting are attached

. Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Kathryn Clay
Kathryn Clay | Vice President, Policy Strategy American Gas Association 400 N. Capitol St., NW | Washington, DC | 20001 P: 202

- 824

- 7122 | F: 202

- 824

- 9125 | kclay@aga.org
#### § 14.21 Filing and service of documents.

Any application for an award or other pleading or document related to an application shall be filed and served on all parties to the proceeding in the same manner as other pleadings in the proceeding, except as provided in § 14.11(b) for confidential financial information. Where the proceeding was held under part 17 of this chapter and the AMS, the application shall be filed with the FAA's attorney and with the Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition.

[Doc. No. FAA-1998-4379, 64 FR 32936, June 18, 1999]
§ 29.1143 Engine controls. ( a ) There must be a separate power control for each engine.
( b ) Power controls must be arranged to allow ready synchronization of all engines by— ( 1 ) Separate control of each engine; and
( 2 ) Simultaneous control of all engines.
( c ) Each power control must provide a positive and immediately responsive means of controlling its engine.
( d ) Each fluid injection control other than fuel system control must be in the corresponding power control. However, the injection system pump may have a separate control.
( e ) If a power control incorporates a fuel shutoff feature, the control must have a means to prevent the inadvertent movement of the control into the shutoff position. The means must— ( 1 ) Have a positive lock or stop at the idle position; and
( 2 ) Require a separate and distinct operation to place the control in the shutoff position.
( f ) For rotorcraft to be certificated for a 30-second OEI power rating, a means must be provided to automatically activate and control the 30-second OEI power and prevent any engine from exceeding the installed engine limits associated with the 30-second OEI power rating approved for the rotorcraft.
[Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34219, Sept. 2, 1988, as amended by Amdt. 29-34, 59 FR 47768, Sept. 16, 1994]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Forstmann & Company, Inc.'s condensed financial statements for the thirty-
nine weeks ended August 3, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-03-1997
<CASH>                                             981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                        64
<INVENTORY>                                     46,980
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,742
<PP&E>                                          25,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                     148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,935
<BONDS>                                         58,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,871
<SALES>                                        149,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,900
<CGS>                                          128,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  140,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,401
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   316
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       571
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,537)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 24,135
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,402)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
467970 © -59 (In pocket)

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

2l 20

Secs. 20, 22, 28, 29, T. 33 S., R. 62 W. Sec. 30, T. 32 S., R. 68 W.

r =a 6 SSS

/.- ie 8

BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 37

O02eU

002euU
oo1u

170 ft same
25 ft covered

EXPLANATION
150 ft same
Sondstone
Shole
Silty shale
Calcoreous shale
295 ft covered;
lower I50f1 seems MRE 201018 cioy
to be brown to black iT ‘Donate
fissile shole os OF QR ems ceate
below; upper 50 ft
:. Limestone
is silty lumpy Pa :
shale as above. coraretions
r——-20 Feet
Igneous dike
110 ft same
BAA arusty zoe 10
ot Gilbert, FFX SRS 004eU e
= shorn Y WN ooluU S
Springs =
= member 20 ft same 10.00 3eU
BS 4 003U fe:
OO3eU Igneous dike Vertical scale
003uU
0.002eU-equivolent uranium
content (percent)
.002U-uranium content (percent)
OO02eU
20 -Locality number
pvvv i
; See figure 27
60 ft si e
ra 8ft covered Pierre shale
Niobraro
AAA. formation
Pierre shale
Niobrora
A ae formation B B

<— 37 miles ———__»

COLUMNAR SECTIONS OF LOWER PART OF PIERRE SHALE IN LAS ANIMAS COUNTY. COLORADO
§ 29.1023 Oil radiators. ( a ) Each oil radiator must be able to withstand any vibration, inertia, and oil pressure loads to which it would be subjected in operation.
( b ) Each oil radiator air duct must be located, or equipped, so that, in case of fire, and with the airflow as it would be with and without the engine operating, flames cannot directly strike the radiator.