alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 404/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 404 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4930 December 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 404

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4930 December 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 1923/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (1) |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods |
| | * | Decision No 1926/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 establishing a programme of Community action in the field of consumer policy (2007-2013) (1) |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

*

Regulation (EC) No 1923/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (1)

*

Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods

*

Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods

*

Decision No 1926/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 establishing a programme of Community action in the field of consumer policy (2007-2013) (1)

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   (Text with EEA relevance) |

---

(1)   (Text with EEA relevance)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Jarbidge

Record of Decision and

Approved Resource Management Plan 

September 2015

US Department of Interior

Bureau of Land Management

BLM 

Jarbidge Field Office, Twin Falls District 
BLM Mission Statement

It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the

health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use

and enjoyment of present and future generations.

BLM/ID/PL-15/002+1610

Photo Credit: Bob Wick, Bruneau River Canyon
POWER OF ATTORNEY
                         WOODIE FLOWERS

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, Woodie
Flowers, hereby constitutes and appoints N. Edward Berg, his true
ad lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Form 10-KSB  of
Micro  Interconnect Technology, Inc., a Nevada  corporation,  for
the  fiscal  year ended December 31, 1999, and any amendments  or
supplements thereto, and to file this Power of Attorney  and  the
Form  10-K,  with  all exhibits thereto, and other  documents  in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and  the NASD, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full
power  and  authority  to  do  and  perform  each  requisite  and
necessary act to be done in and about the premises, as  fully  to
all  intents  and  purposes as he might or could  do  in  person,
hereby  ratifying  and confirming all that said  attorney-in-fact
and agent, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     Dated this 27th day of March, 2000.

     Signature:


     /s/ Woodie Flowers
     ____________________________
     Woodie Flowers
**EXHIBIT 12.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Ruggero Caterini, Chief Financial Officer of TIM Hellas Telecommunications S.A., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of TIM Hellas Telecommunications S.A.,(the “company”); 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4.  The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors andthe audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 

 

 (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: June 1, 2005 /s/ RUGGERO CATERINI            **Name: Ruggero Caterini**   **Title: Chief Financial Officer**
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 131 (Friday, July 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 44608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16310]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9027-9]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 06/27/2016 Through 07/01/2016
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20160148, Final, USACE, NC, Figure Eight Island Shoreline 
Management Project, Review Period Ends: 08/08/2016, Contact: Mickey 
Sugg 910-251-4811.
EIS No. 20160149, Final, BIA, FL, Seminole Tribe of Florida Fee to 
Trust, Review Period Ends: 08/08/2016, Contact: Chester McGhee 615-564-
6830.
EIS No. 20160150, Final Supplement, NIGC, CA, Jamul Indian Village, 
Review Period Ends: 08/08/2016, Contact: Andrew Mendoza 202-634-0012.
EIS No. 20160151, Final, BLM, CO, Bull Mountain Unit Master Development 
Plan, Review Period Ends: 08/08/2016, Contact: Gina Jones 970-240-5300.
EIS No. 20160152, Draft, USFS, NM, Santa Fe National Forest Geothermal 
Leasing, Comment Period Ends: 08/22/2016, Contact: Larry Gore 575-289-
3264.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20160128, Final, USACE, NC, Morehead City Harbor Integrated 
Dredged Material Management Plan, Review Period Ends: 08/11/2016, 
Contact: Jennifer Owens 910-251-4757.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 06/10/2016; Extending Review Period 
from 07/11/2016 to 08/11/2016.

    Dated: July 1, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-16310 Filed 7-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:321 Filed:06/13/17 Entered:06/13/17 17:33:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:321 Filed:06/13/17 Entered:06/13/17 17:33:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:321 Filed:06/13/17 Entered:06/13/17 17:33:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:321 Filed:06/13/17 Entered:06/13/17 17:33:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:321 Filed:06/13/17 Entered:06/13/17 17:33:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:321 Filed:06/13/17 Entered:06/13/17 17:33:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:321 Filed:06/13/17 Entered:06/13/17 17:33:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 7 of 7
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for licenses as Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515). 

Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 20573. 

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants: 

BDP Transport, LLC, 510 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106, Officers: Richard J. Bolte, Jr., President, (Qualifying Individual) John McMillan, Director. 

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder Transportation Intermediary Applicants: 

Logistics +, Inc., One Centennial Drive, Jamestown, NY 14701, Officers: Debra A. Wagner, Manager, (Qualifying Individual) James R. Berlin, President. 

Atlantic Pacific Container Line LLC d/b/a APC Line, Aero Marine Industrial Park Oak Street, Bldg. #K, Keyport, NJ 07735, Officer: Nadia A. Otagah, CEO, (Qualifying Individual). 

Ocean Freight Forwarders—Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants: 

J&M International, Inc., 7020 S. Yale, Suite 207, Tulsa, OK 74136-5744, Officers: Joseph D. Fain, President, (Qualifying Individual) Tom K. Murray, Vice President. 

Dated: April 28, 2000. 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-11068 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Richard Rubin, CEO, CFO and
Chairman of Peregrine Industries, Inc, a Florida corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of Peregrine Industries, Inc. and results of its
operations.

Date: October 13, 2009/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Alfred Lam, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pacific CMA, Inc.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report.

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
      have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
            material information relating to the registrant, including its
            consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
            those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
            is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures as of date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
            this report (the "Evaluation Date");

      c)    presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
            the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
            the Evaluation Date.

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation, to registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent functions):

      a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the
            internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
            ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
            have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
            weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal controls; and

6.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
      quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
      controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
      controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
      any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
      material weaknesses.

Date: May 15, 2006                    By: /s/Alfred Lam
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Alfred Lam, Chief Executive Officer
§ 25.473 Landing load conditions and assumptions. ( a ) For the landing conditions specified in § 25.479 to § 25.485 the airplane is assumed to contact the ground— ( 1 ) In the attitudes defined in § 25.479 and § 25.481;
( 2 ) With a limit descent velocity of 10 fps at the design landing weight (the maximum weight for landing conditions at maximum descent velocity); and
( 3 ) With a limit descent velocity of 6 fps at the design take-off weight (the maximum weight for landing conditions at a reduced descent velocity).
( 4 ) The prescribed descent velocities may be modified if it is shown that the airplane has design features that make it impossible to develop these velocities.
( b ) Airplane lift, not exceeding airplane weight, may be assumed unless the presence of systems or procedures significantly affects the lift.
( c ) The method of analysis of airplane and landing gear loads must take into account at least the following elements: ( 1 ) Landing gear dynamic characteristics.
( 2 ) Spin-up and springback.
( 3 ) Rigid body response.
( 4 ) Structural dynamic response of the airframe, if significant.
( d ) The landing gear dynamic characteristics must be validated by tests as defined in § 25.723(a).
( e ) The coefficient of friction between the tires and the ground may be established by considering the effects of skidding velocity and tire pressure. However, this coefficient of friction need not be more than 0.8.
[Amdt. 25-91, 62 FR 40705, July 29, 1997; Amdt. 25-91, 62 FR 45481, Aug. 27, 1997; Amdt. 25-103, 66 FR 27394, May 16, 2001]
#### Kimbrough *v.*The State.

*Violating Prohibition Law.*

(Decided May 13, 1915.

68 South. 673.)

1. *Intoxicating Liquors; Evidence.*— Where the witness testified that L. and others gave him money with which to buy whisky, and that he purchased the whisky from defendant, the testimony of L. that he and the others gave the witness the money, and sent him for the whisky, was admissible as corroborative of the testimony of the witness.

2. *Charge of Court; Misleading.*— An instruction that the jury were authorized to acquit under the evidence was properly refused as misleading, and for other reasons.

Appeal from Winston County Court.

Heard before Hon. John S. Curtis.

Henry Kimbrough was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Charge 2 is as follows: I charge you that, under the evidence in this case, you are authorized to acquit defendant.

Travis Williams, for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and W. H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

BROWN, J.-

(1) In connection with the testimony of the witness Wheeler that Albert Long and others gave *189him money to buy whisky with, and that he (Wheeler) went to the house of the defendant and purchased whisky from defendant, it Avas competent to show by Long that he and the others mentioned gave Wheeler the money and sent him after the whisky. This evidence tended to corroborate the testimony of *Wheeler.*—Spigener *v. State,*11 Ala. App. 296, 66 South. 896.

(2) Charge 2 states no principle of law and hypothesizes no facts as a predicate for the instruction. It also possesses a tendency to mislead the jury to the conclusion that it is their duty to acquit the defendant.-

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00653-CR

Nicholas A. BALDERAMA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 11, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 252539

Honorable Carlo Key, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 18, 2013.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
#### § 1261.506 Limitation periods.

NASA may not initiate administrative offset to collect a debt under 31 U.S.C. 3716 more than 10 years after the Government's right to collect the debt first accrued, unless facts material to the Government's right to collect the debt were not known and could not reasonably have been known by the official or officials of the Government who were charged with the responsibility to discover and collect such debts. Determination of when the debt first accrued is to be made in accordance with existing law regarding the accrual of debts, such as under 28 U.S.C. 2415. See 4 CFR 102.3(b)(3).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BULMARCK CRUZ-PALMA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-71350 

Agency No. A205-711-526 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Bulmarck Cruz-Palma, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-71350 

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in 

part the petition for review.

We reject as unsupported by the record Cruz-Palma’s contention that he 

exhausted the merits of his asylum claim, where the record demonstrates that, in 

his counseled appeal brief to the BIA, the only issue raised as to asylum was the

concession that the record did not demonstrate an exception to the one-year filing 

deadline. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review Cruz-Palma’s contentions as to 

the merits of his asylum claim because he failed to raise them to the BIA. See

Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction 

to review claims not presented to the agency).

In his opening brief, Cruz-Palma does not challenge the agency’s dispositive

internal relocation determination as to withholding of removal, and also does not

challenge the agency’s denial of CAT relief. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 

F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a 

party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to 

Cruz-Palma’s withholding of removal and CAT claims.

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Cruz-Palma’s contentions as to 

his membership in a cognizable particular social group. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 

371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts are not required to decide issues 

unnecessary to the results they reach). 
3 16-71350 

Cruz-Palma also does not challenge the BIA’s conclusion that the IJ did not 

violate his right to due process. See Lopez-Vasquez, 706 F.3d at 1079-80.

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.