alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3859 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3859

 To extend the covered period for the paycheck protection program, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 1, 2020

 Mrs. Loeffler introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the covered period for the paycheck protection program, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Paycheck Protection Program 
Timeframe Modification and Extension Act'' or the ``PPP TIME Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM AND LOAN 
              FORGIVENESS.

    (a) Extension of Covered Period for Paycheck Protection Program.--
Section 7(a)(36)(A)(iii) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
636(a)(36)(A)(iii)) is amended by striking ``June 30, 2020'' and 
inserting ``August 15, 2020''.
    (b) Loan Forgiveness.--Section 1106 of the CARES Act (Public Law 
116-136) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ``the 8-week period'' 
        and inserting ``any 8-week period, as selected by an eligible 
        recipient, occurring during the 24-week period''; and
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (5)(B), by striking ``June 30, 
                2020'' each place that term appears and inserting 
                ``August 15, 2020'';
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph 
                (7); and
                    (C) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:
            ``(6) Amount of payroll costs.--For purposes of determining 
        eligibility for and the amount of loan forgiveness under this 
        section, the Administrator may not require an eligible 
        recipient to use more than 50 percent of the proceeds of a 
        covered loan for payroll costs.''.
    (c) Application.--The amendments made by this section shall apply 
to loans made under section 7(a)(36) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 636(a)(36)) before, on, or after the date of enactment of this 
Act.

SEC. 3. DELAY OF PAYMENT OF EMPLOYER PAYROLL TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2302(a) of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-
136) is amended by striking paragraph (3).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall be 
effective as if included in the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136) and 
shall apply to any loan made pursuant to section 7(a)(36) of the Small 
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)) or section 1109 of the CARES Act 
(Public Law 116-136).
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# AGENCY:

Community College of the Air Force; DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Community College of the Air Force (CCAF) Board of Visitors will hold a meeting to review and discuss academic policies and issues relative to the operation of the college. Agenda items include a review of the operations of the CCAF and an update on the activities of the CCAF Policy Council. 

                        Members of the public who wish to make oral or written statements at the meeting should contact First Lieutenant Matthew M. Groleau, Designated Federal Officer for the Board, at the address below no later than 4:00 p.m. on May 30, 2000. Please mail or electronically mail all requests. Telephone requests will not be honored. The request should identify the name of the individual who will make the presentation and an outline of the issues to be addressed. A minimum of 35 copies of the presentation materials must be given to First Lieutenant Groleau no later than three days prior to the time of the board meeting for distribution. Visual aids must be submitted to First Lieutenant Groleau on a 3                        1/2                         inch computer disc in Microsoft PowerPoint format no later than 4:00 p.m. on May 30, 2000 to allow sufficient time for virus scanning and formatting of the slides.                     

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 6, 2000 at 8:00 a.m. on the Main Floor Conference Room, Air University, Building 800, 130 West Maxwell Boulevard, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

First Lieutenant Matthew M. Groleau, (334) 953-7322, Community College of the Air Force, 130 West Maxwell Boulevard, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, 36112-6613, or through electronic mail at matthew.groleau@maxwell.af.mil. 

Janet A. Long,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-11133 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
§ 27.1587 Performance information. ( a ) The Rotorcraft Flight Manual must contain the following information, determined in accordance with §§ 27.49 through 27.87 and 27.143(c) and (d): ( 1 ) Enough information to determine the limiting height-velocity envelope.
( 2 ) Information relative to— ( i ) The steady rates of climb and descent, in-ground effect and out-of-ground effect hovering ceilings, together with the corresponding airspeeds and other pertinent information including the calculated effects of altitude and temperatures;
( ii ) The maximum weight for each altitude and temperature condition at which the rotorcraft can safely hover in-ground effect and out-of-ground effect in winds of not less than 17 knots from all azimuths. These data must be clearly referenced to the appropriate hover charts. In addition, if there are other combinations of weight, altitude and temperature for which performance information is provided and at which the rotorcraft cannot land and take off safely with the maximum wind value, those portions of the operating envelope and the appropriate safe wind conditions must be stated in the Rotorcraft Flight Manual;
( iii ) For reciprocating engine-powered rotorcraft, the maximum atmospheric temperature at which compliance with the cooling provisions of §§ 27.1041 through 27.1045 is shown; and
( iv ) Glide distance as a function of altitude when autorotating at the speeds and conditions for minimum rate of descent and best glide as determined in § 27.71.
( b ) The Rotorcraft Flight Manual must contain— ( 1 ) In its performance information section any pertinent information concerning the takeoff weights and altitudes used in compliance with § 27.51; and
( 2 ) The horizontal takeoff distance determined in accordance with § 27.65(a)(2)(i).
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c) of the Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-14, 43 FR 2326, Jan. 16, 1978; Amdt. 27-21, 49 FR 44435, Nov. 6, 1984; Amdt. 27-44, 73 FR 11000, Feb. 29, 2008; 73 FR 33876, June 16, 2008; Amdt. 27-51, 88 FR 8739, Feb. 10, 2023]
Tyler Barnes 

1417 4 Bone Camp Road, Coker AL 35452 

205.210.9611 

tbarnes7 6@gmail.com 

11/12/2015 

Petition for Section 333 Exemption 

._,\ 

I hereby formally request FAA authorization for Tyler Barnes dba Tyler Barnes Photography 

(hereafter "PETITIONER") to operate a UAS for civil (non-governmental) purposes other than for 

recreation or hobby. 

PETITIONER requests to be exempted from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 

61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow PETITIONER to 

operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection, including but not limited to aerial imaging. 

· PETITIONER requests this exemption for its {!Se of UAS both within and without the United States. 

PETITIONER frequently travels abroad for photographic endeavors and. seeks to use UAS in 

accordance with all laws of foreign and domestic governmental authorities. 

PETITIONER requests this permission to pursue its use ofUAS models including DJI Phantom 1, DJI 

Phantom 2, DJI Phantom 3, DJI Inspire, 3D Robotics IRIS+, 3D Robotics Solo, 3D Robotics X8+, and 

3D Robotics X8- M, or other similar commercially-available and widely-available UAS models. 

PETITIONER will conduct its use of UAS in a manner which will minimize risk to the NAS, other 

persons, and property. The following procedures will be followed: (1) UAS will be given a pre-flight 

inspection before each flight to examine air-worthiness, (2) UAS will not be materially altered from 

commercial specifications except for battery, prop, and battery alterations, (3) UAS will not be 

flown over people, ( 4) UAS will always.be flown within line of sight to operator( s) pursuant to 

Section 333(b)(1), (5) UAS will never reach altitudes over exceeding those allowed, (6) UAS will 

never reach speeds exceeding 50 mph, (7) operator will perform a pre-flight visual inspection of the 

NAS to determine nearby dangers such as low-flying manned or unmanned aerial vehicles, power 

lines, and buildings, (8) UAS will be checked for flight stability, proper connection to remote 

control, and proper performance at a very low altitude before reaching the NAS, and (9) nonparticipating spectators will be asked to stay a safe distance away from the flight path of the UAS 

and its landing location. PETITIONER is an experienced UAS operator with more than one year of 

experience. 

This petition will benefit the public interest. PETITIONER will provide imagery which is not 

otherwise possible to be captured without the use of a UAV, which will assist companies to which 

the images may be sold, will enhance the public understanding of nature photographed by the UAS, 
and PETITIONER will be able to provide UAS safety information to those with whom he or she 

comes in contact. 

Please grant the requested exemption under Section 333. 

<~·····--~~;:?~--······· ... -:;::::::-- ~ 

_... ...... ...---TYler Barnes
§ 29.397 Limit pilot forces and torques. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the limit pilot forces are as follows: ( 1 ) For foot controls, 130 pounds.
( 2 ) For stick controls, 100 pounds fore and aft, and 67 pounds laterally.
( b ) For flap, tab, stabilizer, rotor brake, and landing gear operating controls, the following apply (R = radius in inches): ( 1 ) Crank wheel, and lever controls, [1 + R]/3 × 50 pounds, but not less than 50 pounds nor more than 100 pounds for hand operated controls or 130 pounds for foot operated controls, applied at any angle within 20 degrees of the plane of motion of the control.
( 2 ) Twist controls, 80R inch-pounds.
[Amdt. 29-12, 41 FR 55471, Dec. 20, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 29-47, 66 FR 23538, May 9, 2001]
#### § 27.241 Ground resonance.

The rotorcraft may have no dangerous tendency to oscillate on the ground with the rotor turning.
#### § 147.21 Certificate of completion.

Each certificated aviation maintenance technician school must provide an authenticated document to each graduating student, indicating the student's date of graduation and curriculum completed.
II 

Calendar No. 45 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 395 

[Report No. 116–14] 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to include 

a link to a 100 word plain language summary of the proposed rule. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. RISCH, Mr. PETERS, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs 

MARCH 25, 2019 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

A BILL 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, 

to include a link to a 100 word plain language summary 

of the proposed rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Account5 ability Through Transparency Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 395 RS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100 WORD SUMMARY TO 

2 REGULATIONS.GOV. 

3 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

6 end; 

7 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

8 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(4) the Internet address of a summary of not 

12 more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, 

13 in plain language, that shall be posted on the Inter14 net website under section 206(d) of the E-Govern15 ment Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) (commonly 

16 known as regulations.gov).’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 45 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 395 

[Report No. 116–14] 

A BILL 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a 

plain language summary of the proposed rule. rule making, to include a link to a 100 word 

MARCH 25, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 27.681 Limit load static tests. ( a ) Compliance with the limit load requirements of this part must be shown by tests in which— ( 1 ) The direction of the test loads produces the most severe loading in the control system; and
( 2 ) Each fitting, pulley, and bracket used in attaching the system to the main structure is included.
( b ) Compliance must be shown (by analyses or individual load tests) with the special factor requirements for control system joints subject to angular motion.
#### § 25.1529 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness.

The applicant must prepare Instructions for Continued Airworthiness in accordance with appendix H to this part that are acceptable to the Administrator. The instructions may be incomplete at type certification if a program exists to ensure their completion prior to delivery of the first airplane or issuance of a standard certificate of airworthiness, whichever occurs later.

[Amdt. 25-54, 45 FR 60173, Sept. 11, 1980]
§ 135.227 Icing conditions: Operating limitations. ( a ) No pilot may take off an aircraft that has frost, ice, or snow adhering to any rotor blade, propeller, windshield, stabilizing or control surface; to a powerplant installation; or to an airspeed, altimeter, rate of climb, flight attitude instrument system, or wing, except that takeoffs may be made with frost under the wing in the area of the fuel tanks if authorized by the FAA.
( b ) No certificate holder may authorize an airplane to take off and no pilot may take off an airplane any time conditions are such that frost, ice, or snow may reasonably be expected to adhere to the airplane unless the pilot has completed all applicable training as required by § 135.341 and unless one of the following requirements is met: ( 1 ) A pretakeoff contamination check, that has been established by the certificate holder and approved by the Administrator for the specific airplane type, has been completed within 5 minutes prior to beginning takeoff. A pretakeoff contamination check is a check to make sure the wings and control surfaces are free of frost, ice, or snow.
( 2 ) The certificate holder has an approved alternative procedure and under that procedure the airplane is determined to be free of frost, ice, or snow.
( 3 ) The certificate holder has an approved deicing/anti-icing program that complies with § 121.629(c) of this chapter and the takeoff complies with that program.
( c ) No pilot may fly under IFR into known or forecast light or moderate icing conditions or under VFR into known light or moderate icing conditions, unless— ( 1 ) The aircraft has functioning deicing or anti-icing equipment protecting each rotor blade, propeller, windshield, wing, stabilizing or control surface, and each airspeed, altimeter, rate of climb, or flight attitude instrument system;
( 2 ) The airplane has ice protection provisions that meet section 34 of appendix A of this part; or
( 3 ) The airplane meets transport category airplane type certification provisions, including the requirements for certification for flight in icing conditions.
( d ) No pilot may fly a helicopter under IFR into known or forecast icing conditions or under VFR into known icing conditions unless it has been type certificated and appropriately equipped for operations in icing conditions.
( e ) Except for an airplane that has ice protection provisions that meet section 34 of appendix A, or those for transport category airplane type certification, no pilot may fly an aircraft into known or forecast severe icing conditions.
( f ) If current weather reports and briefing information relied upon by the pilot in command indicate that the forecast icing condition that would otherwise prohibit the flight will not be encountered during the flight because of changed weather conditions since the forecast, the restrictions in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section based on forecast conditions do not apply.
[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 133-20, 51 FR 40710, Nov. 7, 1986; Amdt. 135-46, 58 FR 69629, Dec. 30, 1993; Amdt. 135-60, 61 FR 2616, Jan. 26, 1996; Amdt. 135-119, 74 FR 62696, Dec. 1, 2009]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

		     WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

			    FORM 10-Q/A


[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 31, 1996

[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition from ___________________ to ___________________

		    Commission file number 0-16158


			 WTD Industries, Inc.
      (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

      Oregon                                            93-0832150
(State or other jurisdiction of                   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                 Identification No.)

  10260 S.W. Greenburg Road, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon  97223
  (Address of principal executive offices)              (Zip Code)

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) (503) 246-3440


     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.  Yes__X__ No_____

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed all
documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes__X__ No_____

     The number of shares outstanding of Registrant's Common Stock,
no par value, at February 29, 1996 was 11,077,074.



			WTD INDUSTRIES, INC.

     The following Financial Data Schedule (the "FDS") is filed            
as a correction to the FDS filed as part of the Report on
Form 10-Q for WTD Industries, Inc. for the quarterly period ended 
January 31, 1996.

		  Exhibit 27  Financial Data Schedule


SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



					 WTD INDUSTRIES, INC.
					 ----------------------
					 (Registrant)


					 By: s/Bruce L. Engel
					 -------------------------
					 Bruce L. Engel
					 President

					 By: s/K. Stanley Martin
					 -------------------------
					 K. Stanley Martin
					 Vice President-Finance


Dated: March 12, 1996
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JACQUELINE WARNER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

CMG MORTGAGE, INC.; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-17505

D.C. No. 4:15-cv-01835-YGR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017**

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Jacqueline Warner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action alleging Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and state law claims. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for 

failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Harkonen 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 24 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-17505 

v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 800 F.3d 1143, 1148 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Warner’s TILA claims as barred by the 

doctrine of res judicata because Warner unsuccessfully raised those same claims 

before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. 

See Siegel v. Fed. Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 143 F.3d 525, 528-29 (9th Cir. 

1998) (holding borrower’s action against lender was barred by the res judicata 

effect of a related bankruptcy proceeding); United States v. Coast Wineries, 131 

F.2d 643, 648 (9th Cir. 1942) (“[A]n order disallowing a claim in bankruptcy is 

binding and conclusive on all parties or their privies, and being in the nature of a 

final judgment, furnishes a basis for a plea of res judicata.”). Contrary to Warner’s 

contention, the decision in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 

790 (2015), does not affect the res judicata bar.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Warner’s motion 

for reconsideration because Warner failed to establish any basis for such relief. 

See Sch. Dist. No.1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 

(9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for relief under 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b)).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 
3 15-17505 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Warner’s motions filed on April 8, 2016 and May 4, 2016 are denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 29.1109 Carburetor air cooling.

It must be shown under § 29.1043 that each installation using two-stage superchargers has means to maintain the air temperature, at the carburetor inlet, at or below the maximum established value.