alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 324/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 324 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6119 December 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 324

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6119 December 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1973 of 7 December 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 909/2013 on the technical specifications for the electronic chart display and information system for inland navigation (Inland ECDIS) referred to in Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1973 of 7 December 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 909/2013 on the technical specifications for the electronic chart display and information system for inland navigation (Inland ECDIS) referred to in Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 1259.501 Responsibilities. ( a ) All institutions that receive Space Grant fellowships shall use the awards to increase the pool of graduate students in fields related to space.
( b ) The overall fellowship program shall be cognizant of the importance of achieving institutional and geographical diversity.
[82 FR 35442, July 31, 2017]
§ 23.2620 Airplane flight manual. The applicant must provide an Airplane Flight Manual that must be delivered with each airplane. ( a ) The Airplane Flight Manual must contain the following information— ( 1 ) Airplane operating limitations;
( 2 ) Airplane operating procedures;
( 3 ) Performance information;
( 4 ) Loading information; and
( 5 ) Other information that is necessary for safe operation because of design, operating, or handling characteristics.
( b ) The following sections of the Airplane Flight Manual must be approved by the FAA in a manner specified by the Administrator— ( 1 ) For low-speed, level 1 and 2 airplanes, those portions of the Airplane Flight Manual containing the information specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; and
( 2 ) For high-speed level 1 and 2 airplanes and all level 3 and 4 airplanes, those portions of the Airplane Flight Manual containing the information specified in paragraphs (a)(1) thru (a)(4) of this section.
[Doc. No. FAA-2015-1621, Amdt. 23-64, 81 FR 96689, Dec. 30, 2016, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. 23-65, 87 FR 75710, Dec. 9, 2022]
#### § 27.477 Landing gear arrangement.

Sections 27.235, 27.479 through 27.485, and 27.493 apply to landing gear with two wheels aft, and one or more wheels forward, of the center of gravity.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UltraStrip Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
James C. Rushing III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ James C. Rushing III
                                                  ------------------------
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

Date:   November 15, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 243.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to ensure that the U.S. government has prompt and adequate information in case of an aviation disaster on covered flight segments.
### Williams , Rene e (OST) " D Qc^l^^- V l>OT'03T-(^97-ZW2
- From : Robert Hageman n [roberth@co.jefferson.ny.us ] Sent : Friday , Augus t 13 , 201 0 12:4 7 P M To : 'Ric h Corbett' ; EA S (OST ) , - .. . --,r > i Cc : JLawrence@co.jefferson.ny.u s ./:,•.,

. Subject : RE : Lette ro f Support fo rCap e Air , Continue d EA S Servic e t o Watertow n
Ric h Thank s fo rforwardin g t o u s th e lette rof suppor t fro m thi s loca l club

. Al l goo d point s bein g mad e i n thi s communicatio n and , a s yo u know , non e tha t w e woul d no t totall yagre e with

. Th e issu e at han d fo rth e count yi s tryin g t o determin e whic h o fth e thre e airlin e proposal s bes t align s itsel fwit h ou rbusines s plan

. I hav e forwarde d thi s lette rof support t o al l o f ou r participatin g airport committe e members , includin g bot h ou rBoar d Chairma n & Vic e Chairperson

. Again , I appreciat e you rbringin g thi s t o ou rattention

. Bo b

From : Ric h Corbet t [mailto:tiparrotheads@yahoo.com ] Sent : Thursday , Augus t 12 , 201 0 6:0 5 A M To : RobertH@co.jefferson.ny.us ; eas@dot.go v Cc : JLawrence@co.jefferson.ny.u s Subject : Lette ro f Support fo rCap e Air , Continue d EA S Servic e t o Watertow n 

### Hello , Attache di s alette r

of support o f Cap e Air' s proposa l for

continue dai r

servic e t o th e Watertow nInternationa l Airport

. Andre aBos , Interi mPresiden t 100 0 Island s Parro t

Hea dClu b P.O

. Bo x 826 3 Watertown , NY 1360 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          35,648
<SECURITIES>                                21,377,573
<RECEIVABLES>                                  372,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,786,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          383,257
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,402,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,786,025
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,469
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                135,469
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            135,469
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   135,469
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.4





Summary of Charles Vinick Employment Arrangement







Effective August 1, 2010, Charles Vinick was appointed full-time Executive Chairman.  Mr. Vinick receives an annual salary of $225,000 and was granted 1,000,000 five-year non-qualified stock options exercisable at $0.82 per share.  Of the options: (i) 250,000 are fully vested and (ii) the balance vest in equal increments each June 30th and December 31st with the first vesting date being June 30, 2011 and the last vesting date being June 30, 2013.  Mr. Vinick will receive an annual bonus equivalent to one percent of the annual growth in EBITA year-over-year.
§ 23.2435 Powerplant induction and exhaust systems. ( a ) The air induction system for each powerplant or auxiliary power unit and their accessories must— ( 1 ) Supply the air required by that powerplant or auxiliary power unit and its accessories under likely operating conditions;
( 2 ) Be designed to prevent likely hazards in the event of fire or backfire;
( 3 ) Minimize the ingestion of foreign matter; and
( 4 ) Provide an alternate intake if blockage of the primary intake is likely.
( b ) The exhaust system, including exhaust heat exchangers for each powerplant or auxiliary power unit, must— ( 1 ) Provide a means to safely discharge potential harmful material; and
( 2 ) Be designed to prevent likely hazards from heat, corrosion, or blockage.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-253-000]

                    Take notice that on April 19, 2000, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing with the Commission its Refund Report on the flow back to customers on March 10, 2000, of $2,959.92 representing the time value of money associated with the deferred taxes applicable to certain lines and meters sold to Columbia Natural Resources, Inc. pursuant to Stipulation II, Article III, Section G(2) of Columbia's approved settlement in Docket No. RP95-408,                     *et al.*                    (see Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. 79 FERC ¶ 61,044 (1997)) Columbia credited its customers' invoices issued on March 10, 2000 or issued checks on that date.                

Columbia states that a copy of this report is being provided to all recipients of a share of the flowback and all state commissions whose jurisdiction includes the location of any such recipient.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal  Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before May 2, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10721  Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (a) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (a) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy C. Coxson  
|Timothy C. Coxson      
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 20, 2007         



23
#### Guy Lavern KUEHN *v.*STATE of Arkansas

5722

489 S.W. 2d 505

Opinion delivered January 29, 1973

*Eddie N. Christian, Charles R. Garner,*and *Burl C. Rotenberry,*for appellant.

*Ray Thornton,*Atty. Gen., by: *Henry Ginger,*Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Frank Holt, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant of first degree murder and assessed his punishment at death by electrocution. On appeal the only contention is that the judgment on this verdict constitutes cruel and unusual punishment as forbidden by the United States Constitution and, consequently, his sentence must be reduced to life imprisonment. This contention is valid. *Furman*v. *Georgia,*408 U.S. 238 (1972), *Graham*v. *State,*253 Ark. 462, 486 S.W. 2d 675 (1972), and *O’Neal*v. *State,*253 Ark. 574, 487 S.W. 2d 618.

*890The cause is remanded to the trial court for sentencing to life imprisonment which is the next highest available remedy. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-2308 (Repl. 1964).

Affirmed as modified and remanded.
Editorial Note on Part 139
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

§ 139.313 Snow and ice control. ( a ) As determined by the Administrator, each certificate holder whose airport is located where snow and icing conditions occur must prepare, maintain, and carry out a snow and ice control plan in a manner authorized by the Administrator.
( b ) The snow and ice control plan required by this section must include, at a minimum, instructions and procedures for— ( 1 ) Prompt removal or control, as completely as practical, of snow, ice, and slush on each movement area;
( 2 ) Positioning snow off the movement area surfaces so all air carrier aircraft propellers, engine pods, rotors, and wing tips will clear any snowdrift and snowbank as the aircraft's landing gear traverses any portion of the movement area;
( 3 ) Selection and application of authorized materials for snow and ice control to ensure that they adhere to snow and ice sufficiently to minimize engine ingestion;
( 4 ) Timely commencement of snow and ice control operations; and
( 5 ) Prompt notification, in accordance with § 139.339, of all air carriers using the airport when any portion of the movement area normally available to them is less than satisfactorily cleared for safe operation by their aircraft.
( c ) FAA Advisory Circulars contain methods and procedures for snow and ice control equipment, materials, and removal that are acceptable to the Administrator.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

March 27, 2009

Mr. Shannon H. Ratliff

Ratliff Law Firm, P.L.L.C.

600 Congress Ave., Suite 3100

Austin, Tx 78701-2984

Ms. Deborah G. Hankinson

Hankinson Levinger LLP

750 North St. Paul Street, Suite 1800

Dallas, TX 75201

RE:Case Number:  05-0729

Court of Appeals Number:  13-99-00757-CV

Trial Court Number:  96-7-8148

Style:EXXON CORPORATION AND EXXON TEXAS, INC.

v.

EMERALD OIL & GAS COMPANY, L.C.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  (Justice O'Neill not sitting)

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 05-0729Page 1**
Exhibit 23.1

# Independent
Auditors Consent

We hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report dated February 20, 2004 incorporated by reference in this Form
10-KSB into the previously filed registration statement on Form S-8 for The RiceX
Companys 1997 Stock Option Plan (Registration Statement File No. 333-108280). It
should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of The RiceX Company
subsequent to December 31, 2003, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date
of our report.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Stockton, CaliforniaMarch 30, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11175]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1083]


Grant of Authority; Establishment of a Foreign-Trade Zone County 
of Boundary, Idaho

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for `` * * * the 
establishment. * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the County of Boundary, Idaho (the Grantee), has made 
application to the Board (FTZ Docket 26-99, filed 5/24/99), requesting 
the establishment of a foreign-trade zone at a site in the Eastport 
(Boundary County), Idaho area, adjacent to the Eastport, Idaho Customs 
port of entry;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (64 FR 29993, 6/4/99); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby grants to the Grantee the 
privilege of establishing a foreign-trade zone, designated on the 
records of the Board as Foreign-Trade Zone No. 242, at the site 
described in the application, subject to the Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of April 2000.
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
William M. Daley,
Secretary of Commerce Chairman and Executive Officer.
Attest: Dennis Puccinelli,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11175 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Chapter 4: Environmental Consequences

US Fish & Wildlife Service

Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge
Jefferson County, CO

Boulder County
—— “TefFeRSon County ~

! Notional Wind
“Technology Center

Broomfield County

INDIANA STREET, |

is
-_
ay rt

1 wale

i

H
Alternative C a 1 2 Miles A
Roads and Trails December 2003 N

=== Trails Converted From Existing Roads
=== Newly Constructed Trails

== Unpaved Roads (Publicly Accessible)
== Access Road

(CG. doe Retained Area (Subject to Change)

Figure no. 24

46 Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARCELO RIVERA IBARRA,

a.k.a. Manuel Delgado-Hugo, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-50077

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00941-AHM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

A. Howard Matz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Marcelo Rivera Ibarra appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United

Stated following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction

FILED

FEB 23 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-50077

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ibarra contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to

appreciate its discretion to vary from the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range on

policy grounds and by failing to explain why it rejected his policy arguments

concerning U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). The record belies these contentions. The

court considered Ibarra’s arguments and explained the sentence sufficiently to

permit meaningful appellate review. See United States v. Carty, 502 F.3d 984, 992

(9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

Ibarra further contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in

light of the asserted deficiencies in section 2L1.2(b) and other sentencing factors. 

We consider policy arguments like Ibarra’s within the context of consideration of

the reasonableness of the final sentence. See United States v. Barsumyan, 517 F.3d

1154, 1158-59 (9th Cir. 2008). The record reflects that Ibarra’s sentence, ten

months below the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range, is substantively

reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

sentencing factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

AFFIRMED.
#### FREEMAN v. THE STATE.

(Decided April 22, 1915.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. S. E. Greene.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for tbe State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.