alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 119.63 Recency of operation. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no certificate holder may conduct a kind of operation for which it holds authority in its operations specifications unless the certificate holder has conducted that kind of operation within the preceding number of consecutive calendar days specified in this paragraph: ( 1 ) For domestic, flag, or commuter operations—30 days.
( 2 ) For supplemental or on-demand operations—90 days, except that if the certificate holder has authority to conduct domestic, flag, or commuter operations, and has conducted domestic, flag or commuter operations within the previous 30 days, this paragraph does not apply.
( b ) If a certificate holder does not conduct a kind of operation for which it is authorized in its operations specifications within the number of calendar days specified in paragraph (a) of this section, it shall not conduct such kind of operation unless— ( 1 ) It advises the Administrator at least 5 consecutive calendar days before resumption of that kind of operation; and
( 2 ) It makes itself available and accessible during the 5 consecutive calendar day period in the event that the FAA decides to conduct a full inspection reexamination to determine whether the certificate holder remains properly and adequately equipped and able to conduct a safe operation.
[Doc. No. 28154, 60 FR 65913, Dec. 20, 1995, as amended by Amdt. 119-2, 61 FR 30434, June 14, 1996]
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation
(the  "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, James A. Beck,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to ss.  906  of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  to my
knowledge that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.




/s/ James A. Beck
-----------------
James A. Beck
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                      -8-
#### THE CREEK NATION v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. H-510.

Order, June 4, 1934]

*Order of the Court*

In the matter of the application of E. J. Van Court for the allowance of fees and expenses in case no. H-510, the court approves the findings of the commissioner filed June 2, 1934.

The judgment entered in case no. H-510 was for the sum of $144,106.01, and the court allows to said E. J. Van Court as an attorney’s fee ten percent of said sum, or $14,410.60.

Under the acts of Congress approved May 29, 1928, 45 Stat. 944, and February 14, 1931, 46 Stat. 1139, there has been advanced and paid to E. J. Van Court a total sum of $19,199.24. Both of the above-mentioned acts provide as follows:

> “ That any sums allowed and paid under this act to the attorneys shall be reimbursable to the credit of the Creek Nation out of any amount or amounts which may hereafter be decreed by the Court of Claims to said attorneys for their services and expenses in connection with the Creek tribal claims and suits under the above-mentioned act of May 24, 1924.”

*779Under the contract which Mr. Van Court had with the Indians, duly approved as the law requires, provision was made therein for the services of accountants. Under the provisions of this contract Mr. Van Court has incurred liabilities for services of this character to Messrs. Henry & Wright, of Muskogee, Oklahoma, in the sum of $6,138.44, and to James A. Councilor for similar services in the sum of $5,472, a total of $11,610.44, which sum is still unpaid and remains a liability.

The Creek Nation is entitled to a credit of $19,199.24 heretofore paid to E. J. Van Court, leaving a balance due him of $26,021.04, for which amount judgment will be awarded.

The findings disclose a controversy between the attorneys arising out of an assignment by said E. J. Van Court to certain attorneys of a twenty-five percent interest in his contract with the Creek Nation. The findings, we think, disclose the facts, but the court is without jurisdiction to entertain a controversy of this character involving their respective rights under the contract and assignment. See the case of *William Beddo*v. *United*States, 28 C.Cls., 69.

We summarize the allowances in the following table:

Attorney’s fee allowed to E. J. Van Court_$14,410. 60

Expenses heretofore advanced under the 2 acts mentioned- 19,199.24

Liability incurred for balance due the accountants_ 11, 610.44

Total_ 45, 220. 28

Less credit to Creek Nation for expenses heretofore advanced of_ 19,199. 24

Balance due E. J. Van Court- 26, 021.04

It is therefore ordered this 4th day of June 1934 that there be paid to said E. J. Van Court in full as attorney’s fee and expenses said sum of twenty-six thousand, twenty-one dollars and four cents ($26,021.04).

By the court.
Gormas, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Greetings, 

Gormas, Michael (OST) 

Thursday, April 30, 2015 12:00 PM 

'List 1 Scheduled Air Carriers, Contiguous US and Puerto Rico' 

Martin, Michael (OST); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST); Harvey, Caitlin 

(OST); 'airport1@midwest.net'; 'jhester@quincyil.gov'; 'bloy@cityofcapegirardeau.org' 

Essential Air Service Request for Proposals at Marion-Quincy, IL Cape Girardeau, MO -

DUE DATE: June 4, 2015 

Order 2015-4-26 RFP - Marion Quincy IL Cape Girardeau MO - 2015.pdf 

I have attached the Order requesting proposals from air carriers interesting in providing Essential Air Service for a new 

contract term beginning December 1, 2015 at Marion/Quincy, Illinois, and Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Proposals are due 

by 11:59PM on June 4, 2015, and should bee-mailed directly to michael.f.martin@dot.gov. The Order is available 

online at www.regulations.gov under each community's respective Docket number. Please forward this notice to all 

relevant parties. If you have questions, feel free to contact Michael Martin. 

Regards, 

Michael D. Gormas 

United States Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

202.366.1853 

1
§ 121.549 Flying equipment. ( a ) The pilot in command shall ensure that appropriate aeronautical charts containing adequate information concerning navigation aids and instrument approach procedures are aboard the aircraft for each flight.
( b ) Each crewmember shall, on each flight, have readily available for his use a flashlight that is in good working order.
§ 27.1303 Flight and navigation instruments. The following are the required flight and navigation instruments: ( a ) An airspeed indicator.
( b ) An altimeter.
( c ) A magnetic direction indicator.
#### § 1310.15 Amendment or Waiver of a term or condition of a guaranteed loan.

The Board may, in its discretion, charge the borrower a fee, in an amount and payable as determined by the Board, for each amendment to, or waiver of, any term or condition of any guaranteed loan document or related instrument approved by the Board.

[70 FR 10037, Mar. 2, 2005]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 18, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 18, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0116. RAKEEM D. MCCAMEY v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2020R0103
Sl()-l()()3()9-()23 

MIIWAUKI I COUNTY' S ri

C E N i n A

l I 

MITCHELL 

INTIRNATIONA L AIKCOK T 

March 1,2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washirigtbrii DC 20590 • 

Docket 0bf-tfST-2dlG-0034 

>.:.-:-•?:•• ^it:i'/>r-'v-i^'''.''n -

De^rIVI^JSi^refalry:^-' -'i'''"' • v«"• •-"i? 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitrust immunity and 

proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance 

between these two airlines is vital for the oneworld alliance to effectively serve trans-Pacific routes. 

This increased alliance competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies 

policy-first by solidifying U.S. -Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for further 

liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, I encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this application as it 

would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver highly competitive air 

transport«ition services. Approval for AA/JAl alliance will have a positive- impact on air travei by offering 

customers more service> scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue 

to benefit from the competition afforded by three competitive air alliances. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Yours very truly. 

y -r •-'•:•::\i^.'-:'.if;-, •; .....frl.i, 2' IL. 

C. Barry Batemah, Airport Director 

'Generai Mitchell'lhternational Airport 

5300 S. Howell Avenue 

•Milwaukee, Wl 53207 -^^ 

Bbatemang)mitchellairport.com 

S300 SOUTH HOWEL L AVENUE MILWAUKEE, W l 53207.6IS 6 TEL 414 747 5300 FAX 414 747 452S
S. 4148 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To extend the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TERRORISM 

STANDARDS PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 

HOMELAND SECURITY. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5 of the Protecting and Securing 

Chemical Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014 (Public Law 

113–254; 6 U.S.C. 621 note) is amended by striking ‘‘July 23, 

2020’’ and inserting ‘‘July 27, 2023’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect on the date that is 1 day after the date of enactment 

of this Act. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO

As representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, 

et al.,

Debtors.

NO. 17-BK-3283 (LTS)

PROMESA TITLE III

(Jointly Administered)

MOTION REQUESTING DECISION

TO THE HONORABLE U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN:

COMES NOW the certified Plaintiffs’ Class in case Gladys García Rubiera, etc., v. Hon. 

Luis G. Fortuño, et al, Civil No. 02-1179 (GAG) represented by counsel Antonio J. Amadeo Murga 

and respectfully alleges and moves the court to the following:

The present case has been pending for more than 20 years and the Members of the Certified 

Class, who were deprived of more than $160 million have been unable to receive their money back 

despite repeated rulings of the Honorable Court. 

At this stage, of over million claimants only about 85,000 have filed claims that have been 

approved but not paid on the grounds that they did not provide their bank account and routing 

numbers to the Secretary of the Treasury, which was never required and not properly informed of. 

The case has been submitted to the Honorable Court since August 10, 2022. See, Docket 

#21807, #21753, #21744, #21704, #21696, #21563, and #21562. We feel it is our duty, as the 

remaining attorney1for the certified Plaintiffs’ Class, to respectfully request the Honorable Court 

to issue its ruling.

1 Co-counsel Mario M. Oronoz passed away recently. Appearing counsel has virtually this case as his only pending 

litigation and ready to retire after 64 years of practice.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23881 Filed:03/28/23 Entered:03/28/23 11:04:42 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

We are cognizant of the heavy and voluminous burden that the Honorable Court has on its 

hands with the PROMESA litigation, but as in this case, justice has been terribly delayed, we 

believe that a final prompt ruling on this matter will repair some of the damage done and bring 

closure to this litigation. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on March 28, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all counsel 

of record and parties in the Master Service List.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, March 28, 2023.

 

 s/Antonio J. Amadeo Murga 

USDC-PR No. 110103 

A.J. AMADEO MURGA LAW OFFICES 

605 Condado Ave. 

Suite 518 

San Juan, PR 00907 

Tel. (787)764-0893 

Tel: 787-403-4333 

ajamadeo@gmail.com 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23881 Filed:03/28/23 Entered:03/28/23 11:04:42 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
180911 SCH ORD RE AMPR LIFT STAY.DOCX VERSION SEPTEMBER 11, 2018 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

----------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: PROMESA 

 Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered) 

et al., 

 Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x 

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY

 The Court has received and reviewed the Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay

(the “Motion”) filed by Asociación de Maestros de Puerto Rico and Asociación de Maestros de 

Puerto Rico-Local Sindical (“Movants”). (Docket Entry No. 3914 in Case No. 17-3283.) 

Opposition papers to the Motion must be filed by September 24, 2018. Movants’ reply papers 

must be filed by October 1, 2018. The Court will thereafter take the Motion on submission, 

unless a party thereto requests a hearing. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 11, 2018 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

 United States District Judge 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) 

Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 

BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) (Title III case numbers are listed 

as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3916 Filed:09/11/18 Entered:09/11/18 11:11:53 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7800
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERTO SPALDING, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00105-HCM-3) Submitted: May 2, 2007 Decided: May 16, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roberto Spalding, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Roberto Spalding seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Spalding has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 27.493 Braked roll conditions. Under braked roll conditions with the shock absorbers in their static positions— ( a ) The limit vertical load must be based on a load factor of at least— ( 1 ) 1.33, for the attitude specified in § 27.479(a)(1); and
( 2 ) 1.0 for the attitude specified in § 27.479(a)(2); and
( b ) The structure must be designed to withstand at the ground contact point of each wheel with brakes, a drag load at least the lesser of— ( 1 ) The vertical load multiplied by a coefficient of friction of 0.8; and
( 2 ) The maximum value based on limiting brake torque.
Editorial Note on Part 139
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

§ 139.329 Pedestrians and ground vehicles. In a manner authorized by the Administrator, each certificate holder must— ( a ) Limit access to movement areas and safety areas only to those pedestrians and ground vehicles necessary for airport operations;
( b ) Establish and implement procedures for the safe and orderly access to and operation in movement areas and safety areas by pedestrians and ground vehicles, including provisions identifying the consequences of noncompliance with the procedures by all persons;
( c ) When an air traffic control tower is in operation, ensure that each pedestrian and ground vehicle in movement areas or safety areas is controlled by one of the following: ( 1 ) Two-way radio communications between each pedestrian or vehicle and the tower;
( 2 ) An escort with two-way radio communications with the tower accompanying any pedestrian or vehicle without a radio; or
( 3 ) Measures authorized by the Administrator for controlling pedestrians and vehicles, such as signs, signals, or guards, when it is not operationally practical to have two-way radio communications between the tower and the pedestrian, vehicle, or escort;
( d ) When an air traffic control tower is not in operation, or there is no air traffic control tower, provide adequate procedures to control pedestrians and ground vehicles in movement areas or safety areas through two-way radio communications or prearranged signs or signals;
( e ) Ensure that all persons are trained on procedures required under paragraph (b) of this section prior to the initial performance of such duties and at least once every 12 consecutive calendar months, including consequences of noncompliance, prior to moving on foot, or operating a ground vehicle, in movement areas or safety areas; and
( f ) Maintain the following records: ( 1 ) A description and date of training completed after June 9, 2004 by each individual in compliance with this section. A record for each individual must be maintained for 24 consecutive months after the termination of an individual's access to movement areas and safety areas.
( 2 ) A description and date of any accidents or incidents in the movement areas and safety areas involving air carrier aircraft, a ground vehicle or a pedestrian. Records of each accident or incident occurring after the June 9, 2004 must be maintained for 12 consecutive calendar months from the date of the accident or incident.
[Doc. No. FAA-2000-7479, 69 FR 6424, Feb. 10, 2004, as amended by Amdt. 139-27, 78 FR 3316, Jan. 16, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics: Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
Health and Human Services announces the following advisory committee 
meeting.
    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) 
Executive Subcommittee.
    Time and Date: 10:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. EDT, May 9, 2000.
    Place: Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Conference Room 425A, 200 
Independence Avenue S.W., Washington, DC.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: At this meeting, the Executive Subcommittee will discuss 
work plans for the year 2000, including future meetings, hearings, 
reports, and other projects. They will also begin to plan for a 
strategic planning retreat to be held later this year.
    Notice: In the interest of security, the Department has instituted 
stringent procedures for entrance to the Hubert H. Humphrey building by 
non-government employees. Persons without a government identification 
card may need to have the guard call for an escort to the meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Substantive program information as 
well as summaries of meetings and a roster of committee members may be 
obtained from Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive Secretary, NCVHS, 
National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, Room 1100, Presidential Building, 6525 Belcrest Road, 
Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 458-4245. Information also 
is available on the NCVHS home page of the HHS website: http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/, where further information will be posted when 
available.

    Dated: April 26, 2000.
James Scanlon,
Director, Division of Data Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary 
for Planning and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 00-11125 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-05-M