alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Campaign Expense Accounts

August 11, 1958.

Harry J. Rubin, Deputy Attorney General, and Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General,

You have requested us to-advise you if candidates for election to elective political party offices must file the expense accounts required by section 1607 of the Pennsylvania Election Code of June 3, 1937, P. L. 1333, as amended, 25 PS §3227. By “political party offices” you refer' to such positions as county *367committeeman and State- committeeman as distinguished from elective public offices such as Governor and State senator.

Section 1607 of the code, supra, requires, in part, that every candidate for nomination or election file an expense account or affidavit within 30 days after the primary or election, as the case may be. The terms “candidate for nomination” and “candidate for election” are specifically defined by section 1601 of the code, 25 PS §3221, to mean candidates for any *public*offices. If this use of the term “public office” is precise and intended to distinguish public from party offices, we must conclude that candidates for party offices need not file expense accounts. Our study of the applicable statute and case law convinces us that such a conclusion is required.

Section 902 of the code, supra, 25 PS §2862, requires that all candidates of political parties for the offices of United States senator and representative and for “all other elective public offices within this State” shall be nominated and “party delegates and alternate delegates, committeemen and officers” shall be elected at primaries. This section evidences the precision with which the code was written and the intent to distinguish between public and party offices.

This view is supported by the decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Commonwealth ex rel. Koontz and Calhoun v. Dunkle, 355 Pa. 493, 50 A. 2d 496 (1947), in which the court affirmed a decision of the lower court on the basis of the lower court’s opinion. The lower court pointed out that public officers and party officers are distinct from each other and that members of a political party committee are not public officers.

We advise you, therefore, that candidates for party offices need not file the campaign expense accounts required by the Pennsylvania Election Code.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4025 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4025

    To authorize appropriations for the maritime environmental and 
                     technical assistance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2020

  Mr. Markey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize appropriations for the maritime environmental and 
                     technical assistance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding the Maritime Environmental 
and Technical Assistance Program''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE MARITIME ENVIRONMENTAL 
              AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--There are authorized to be appropriated to the 
Department of Transportation for fiscal year 2021, for expenses 
necessary to support the maritime environmental and technical 
assistance program under section 50307 of title 46, United States Code, 
$6,000,000, which shall remain available until expended, of which 
$3,000,000 shall be used for activities related to technologies that 
support port and vessel air emissions reductions and to support zero 
emissions technologies.
    (b) Emissions.--In this section the term ``emissions'' means ``air 
pollutants'', as defined in section 302(g) of the Clean Air Act (42 
U.S.C. 7602(g)).
    (c) Uses.--Activities conducted pursuant to the authorization under 
this section shall be used to inform the policy decisions of the United 
States related to domestic regulations and to the International 
Maritime Organization, to the extent such activities are relevant.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, 

As representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.

Debtors1.

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17-CV-01578-LTS

Case No. 17-03283

 (Joint Administration Requested)

APPOINTMENT OF OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED

CREDITORS IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO

Pursuant to section 1102(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, made applicable to these 

proceedings by section 301 of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability 

Act of 2016 or “PROMESA”, Guy G. Gebhardt, Acting United States Trustee for Region 21

hereby appoints the following to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in case no. 17-

BK-03283 (the Commonwealth’s Title III Case):

1) The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) 

Attention Mark Richard, Counsel to the President of the AFT

555 New Jersey Ave., N.W.

11th floor 

Washington, DC 20001

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective bankruptcy case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation 

(“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); 

(iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); and (iv) Employees Retirement System 

of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686). Case Nos. 17 BK 3283-LTS and 17 BK 

3284-LTS are jointly administered by order of the court.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:338 Filed:06/15/17 Entered:06/15/17 07:42:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2) Doral Financial Corporation

C/O Drivetrain LLC

630 Third Avenue

21st Floor

New York, NY 10017 

3) Genesis Security 

5900 Ave. Isla Verde

L-2 PMB 438

Carolina, PR 00979

4) Puerto Rico Hospital Supply 

Call Box 158 

Carolina, PR 00986-0158

5) Service Employees International Union (SEIU)

1800 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036 

6) Total Petroleum Puerto Rico Corp.

Citi View Plaza Tower I

48 Road 165 Oficina 803

Guaynabo, PR 00968-8046

7) Unitech Engineering 

C/O Ramón Ortiz Carro

Urb Sabanera 

40 Camino de la Cascada

Cidra, Puerto Rico 00739

DATED: June 15, 2017

GUY G. GEBHARDT

Acting United States Trustee for Region 21

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE

Edificio Ochoa

500 Tanca Street, Suite 301

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901-1922

Tel.: (787) 729-7444

Fax: (787) 729-7449

(Electronically Filed)

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:338 Filed:06/15/17 Entered:06/15/17 07:42:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
By: s/ Monsita Lecaroz-Arribas

Monsita Lecaroz-Arribas

Assistant U.S. Trustee

USDC-PR No. 207707

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:338 Filed:06/15/17 Entered:06/15/17 07:42:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         In connection with the Annual Report of River Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 3, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Patrick G. Yount, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my
knowledge, that:

     1.   The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Patrick G. Yount
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Patrick G. Yount
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        March 24, 2002
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**RULE      13a-14(1) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Grant Petersen      |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Grant                Petersen          |   |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer |   |

----
#### Abe Middleton, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

L An appellate court should not grant a new trial upon the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict of guilty affirmed by the trial court if there is some evidence of all the facts 'legally essential to support the verdict, and the whole evidence is such that the verdict may have fairly been found on it.

2. On a consideration of the evidence, it is held that the jury was warranted in finding the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree. Taylor and Hocker, J. J. dissenting.

Writ of error to the Circuit .Court for Clay County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*Jno. E.*& *Julian Partridge,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Park Trammell,*Attorney General, and *G. O. Andrews,*for the State.

*25Whitfield, C. J.

— On writ of error to a judgment of conviction of murder in the first degree it is contended only that the evidence does not show the homicide tó have been perpetrated from a premeditated design to effect the death of the deceased as charged in the indict ment.

Where a homicide is charged to have been perpetrated from a premeditated design to effect death, and there are no facts or circumstances in evidence from which the formation of such a premeditated design may be fairly found by the jury, a verdict of murder in the first degree should be set aside. Baker v. State, 54 Fla. 12, 44 South. Rep. 719. But an appellate court should not grant a new trial upon the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict of guilty affirmed by the trial court if there is some evidence of all the facts legally essential to support the verdict, and the whole evidence is such that the verdict may have fairly been found on it. McDonald v. State, 56 Fla. 74, 47 South. Rep. 485.

The homicide was committed in the early part of the night at a store in Clay County. It appears that the defendant was at the store in the afternoon when several persons, among them the deceased, were there, one of whom, not the deceased, spoke harshly to him, and when the defendant returned to the store at night he had his gun. While the defendant was at the store several men, including the deceased, went in the store together, and as they started out the defendant had a difficulty with one of them, not the deceased, at. the store , door. All went out the door in the dark. Upon separating from the man with whom he had an encounter, the defendant fired his gun fatally wounding the deceased; who was one of the party, but who had had no difficulty with *26defendant. From these and other circumstances disclosed by the transcript' of the record, the jury were warranted in finding that the defendant shot the deceased from a premeditated design to effect his death. No shots were fired except by the defendant. This being so, the judgment is affirmed.

Shackleford and Cockrell, J. J., concur;

Taylor and Hocker, J. J., dissent.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

--------------------------------------------------------------------x

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

 as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.

 Debtors. 1

PROMESA

Title III 

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

--------------------------------------------------------------------x

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

 as representative of

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY,

 Debtor.

PROMESA

Title III 

Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS

--------------------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER GRANTING URGENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES

IN CONNECTION WITH THE FOURTH AMENDED NOTICE,

CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

 

1

 The Debtors in the jointly-administered Title III cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number 

listed as a bankruptcy case number due to software limitations and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s 

federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 

17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation 

(“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); 

(iii) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (iv) Puerto Rico Highways 

and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 3808); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers 

due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3091-1 Filed:05/17/18 Entered:05/17/18 17:35:19 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 1 of 2
Upon consideration of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority’s (“PREPA”) Urgent 

Motion for Extension of Deadlines in Connection with the Fourth Amended Notice, Case 

Management and Administrative Procedures [ECF No. ___], it is hereby ordered that:

1. PREPA’s Motion for Entry of (I) Bridge Order and (II) Order Pursuant to Rule 

9006(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Further Enlarging the Time Within 

Which to File Notices of Removal Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9027 (the “Removal Extension 

Motion”, ECF No. ___) will be heard at the June 6, 2018 omnibus hearing.

2. Any objections to the Removal Extension Motion must be filed by May 24, 2018 

at 4:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: May ___, 2018

______________________________

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3091-1 Filed:05/17/18 Entered:05/17/18 17:35:19 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 2 of 2
#### § 1230.119 Research undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects.

Except for research waived under § 1230.101(i) or exempted under § 1230.104, in the event research is undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects, but it is later proposed to involve human subjects in the research, the research shall first be reviewed and approved by an IRB, as provided in this policy, a certification submitted by the institution to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research, and final approval given to the proposed change by the Federal department or agency component.
#### § 121.541 Operations schedules: Domestic and flag operations.

In establishing flight operations schedules, each certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations shall allow enough time for the proper servicing of aircraft at intermediate stops, and shall consider the prevailing winds en route and the cruising speed of the type of aircraft used. This cruising speed may not be more than that resulting from the specified cruising output of the engines.

[Doc. No. 28154, 61 FR 2613, Jan. 26, 1996]
§ 145.201 Privileges and limitations of certificate. ( a ) A certificated repair station may— ( 1 ) Perform maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations in accordance with part 43 on any article for which it is rated and within the limitations in its operations specifications.
( 2 ) Arrange for another person to perform the maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations of any article for which the certificated repair station is rated. If that person is not certificated under part 145, the certificated repair station must ensure that the noncertificated person follows a quality control system equivalent to the system followed by the certificated repair station.
( 3 ) Approve for return to service any article for which it is rated after it has performed maintenance, preventive maintenance, or an alteration in accordance with part 43.
( b ) A certificated repair station may not maintain or alter any article for which it is not rated, and may not maintain or alter any article for which it is rated if it requires special technical data, equipment, or facilities that are not available to it.
( c ) A certificated repair station may not approve for return to service' ( 1 ) Any article unless the maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alteration was performed in accordance with the applicable approved technical data or data acceptable to the FAA.
( 2 ) Any article after a major repair or major alteration unless the major repair or major alteration was performed in accordance with applicable approved technical data; and
( 3 ) Any experimental aircraft after a major repair or major alteration performed under § 43.1(b) unless the major repair or major alteration was performed in accordance with methods and applicable technical data acceptable to the FAA.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24480-2 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/09/23 14:16:19 Desc:

Exhibit Exhibit 8 Motion Submitting Document Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.141 Method of revoking concurrence. ( a ) A concurrence may be revoked by filing with the Department a Notice of Revocation of Concurrence prepared in a form acceptable to the Office of International Aviation.
( b ) *Sixty days' notice required.* Such Notice of Revocation of Concurrence shall be filed on not less than sixty days' notice to the Department. A Notice of Revocation of Concurrence will be deemed to be filed only upon its actual receipt by the Department, and the period of notice shall commence to run only from such actual receipt.
( c ) *Number of copies.* Each Notice of Revocation of Concurrence shall be prepared in triplicate. The original thereof shall be filed with the Department and, at the same time that the original is transmitted to the Department, the duplicate thereof shall be sent to the carrier to whom the concurrence was given. The third copy shall be retained by the carrier issuing such notice.
( d ) Amendment of tariffs when concurrence revoked. When a concurrence is revoked, a corresponding amendment of the tariff or tariffs affected shall be made by the issuing carrier of such tariffs, on not less than statutory notice, to become effective not later than the effective date stated in the Notice of Revocation of Concurrence. In the event of failure to so amend the tariff or tariffs, the provisions therein shall remain applicable until lawfully canceled.
230621 EXHIBIT A. APPEARANCE SHEET VERSION JUNE 21, 2023 1

EXHIBIT A1

PARTY APPEARANCE SHEET

Name of Party 

ATTORNEY 1 Appearance Method In Person NY or In Person PR 

Name

Law Firm

Email

Phone Number

Docket Entry No. of

Notice of Appearance

ATTORNEY 2 Appearance Method In Person NY or In Person PR

Name

Law Firm

Email

Phone Number

Docket Entry No. of

Notice of Appearance

1 This Party Appearance Sheet must be attached to a party in interest’s Informative Motion as 

Exhibit A.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24624-1 Filed:06/21/23 Entered:06/21/23 12:07:59 Desc:

Exhibit A - PARTY APPEARANCE SHEET Page 1 of 1
§ 23.2240 Structural durability. ( a ) The applicant must develop and implement inspections or other procedures to prevent structural failures due to foreseeable causes of strength degradation, which could result in serious or fatal injuries, or extended periods of operation with reduced safety margins. Each of the inspections or other procedures developed under this section must be included in the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness required by § 23.1529.
( b ) For Level 4 airplanes, the procedures developed for compliance with paragraph (a) of this section must be capable of detecting structural damage before the damage could result in structural failure.
( c ) For pressurized airplanes: ( 1 ) The airplane must be capable of continued safe flight and landing following a sudden release of cabin pressure, including sudden releases caused by door and window failures.
( 2 ) For airplanes with maximum operating altitude greater than 41,000 feet, the procedures developed for compliance with paragraph (a) of this section must be capable of detecting damage to the pressurized cabin structure before the damage could result in rapid decompression that would result in serious or fatal injuries.
( d ) The airplane must be designed to minimize hazards to the airplane due to structural damage caused by high-energy fragments from an uncontained engine or rotating machinery failure.