alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the restated Report of Bravo! Brands Inc. on Amendment No 3
to Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy G.
Warren, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of we.

                                       By: /S/ Roy G. Warren
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Roy G. Warren
                                           Chief Executive Officer

November 6, 2006
Order entered January 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00181-CR

JOSE ISMAEL ARREOLA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-12-00581-N

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s December 27, 2013 second motion for extension of time 

to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file the brief within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this 

order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>     1000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>            JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                              398     
<SECURITIES>                   1152
<RECEIVABLES>                46
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                  13
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  0 
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      5680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         0
<BONDS>                       0
<COMMON>                       8651
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       5680
<SALES>                          49
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                364
<CGS>                            22
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    88
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                263
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  25    
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                0
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                     25
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
                             

</TABLE>
Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID

Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures Proposed 

Rulemaking: Public Meeting and Webinar

624556617

Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) 

Sep 27, 2013 08:31 AM EDT 417

Total Attended

22

Session Details

First Name Last Name Email Country Address City State Organization Zip Code

Jeevon Baird jbaird@adlt.com US 32000 Aurora Rd. Solon OH Venture Lighting 44139

natasha collins natasha.collins@pnnl.gov US 620 SW 5th Ave Portland OR PNNL 97229

Michael Droesch michael.droesch@navigant.com US 77 s bedford st burlington MA Navigant 01803

Doug Elliott douglas.elliott@pnnl.gov US 620 SW 5th Ave., Suite 810 Portland OR PNNL 97204

David Errigo derrigo@lumenoptix.com US 203 Progress Dr Montgomeryville PA LumenOptix 18936

Jack Graul jack.graul@ee.doe.gov US 950 L Enfant Washington DC DOE 20024

joe hancock joe.hancock@fpl.com US 12350 184 ct n jupiter FL Florida Power & Light 33478

john hodges jhodges@wileyrein.com US 1776 k street nw washigton DC wiley rein 20006

Donna Hostick donna.hostick@pnnl.gov US PO Box 999, MS K6-05 Richland WA Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 99352

Ed Klonowski eklonowski@unvlt.com US 26 Century Blvd., Suite 500 Nashville TN Universal Lighting 37214

Robert Lingard robert.lingard@pnnl.gov US 620 SW 5th Ave Portland OR PNNL 97204

Michael Litvinovich mlitvinovich@unvlt.com US 1267 Hamilton PKWY Itasca IL Universal Lighting Technologies 60143

Sarah Martin sarah.martin@navigant.com US 1200 19th Street Washington DC Navigant Consulting 20036

Astrid Mills astrid.mills@navigant.com US 1200 19th street washington DC Navigant 20036

Natalie Needham nneedham@junolightinggroup.com US 12001 Exit Five Parkway Fishers IN Juno Lighting Group 46038

Joe Parisella joe.parisella@sylvania.com US 54 Cherry Hill Drive Danvers MA OSRAM SYLVANIA 01923

Craig Pawlak craig.pawlak@musco.com US 100 1st Ave W / PO Box 808 Oskaloosa IA Musco Sports Lighting, LLC 52577

Liesel Schulte lschulte@franklinenergy.com US 12075 n corporate pkwy mequon WI Franklin Energy Services 53092

Alex Valenti avalenti@energy-solution.com US 1610 Harrison Oakland CA Energy Solutions 94680

Linda Wilson linda.wilson@ag.ny.gov US 120 Broadway NY NY NYS OAG 10271

Dave Winiarski david.winiarski@pnnl.gov US 902 Battelle Boulevard Richland WA Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 99354

Michael Woodford mwoodford@ahrinet.org US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite # 500 Arlington VA AHRI 22201

General Information
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 3:35 PM

To: 'surveyor@midrivers.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Montana Land Surveys (MLS) [FAA-2014-0889]

Dear Mr. Roger W. Meyer:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2014

‐ 0889). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• Describe the aircraft make(s) and model(s) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include

the following: size, maximum weight (including payload), and aircraft type (i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing,rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air).

• List the maximum aircraft speed(s) proposed for this operation, please include the airspeed type.

• Provide the maximum flight time(s) for the proposed UAS operation.

• Your petition references a pre

‐ flight inspection and/or briefing. Describe the process used to determine if the

UAS is airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS.

• Describe the process used to document UAS discrepancies and the corrective action taken in the aircraft

record. Examples of processes include (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain its UAS and

ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the petitioner has elected to

maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and inspection recommendations.

• Your petition references the material(s) listed below, however the material(s) were not submitted for the

record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o operator's manual

o Flight Manual

o Operating Handbook

o eBee user manual

o Trimble user manual

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to jake.troutman@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 02/17/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 95212
October 3, 2016

Mr. Brett Goldsmith

Joby Aviation

340 Woodpecker Ridge

Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Re: FAA–2016–5094

Dear Mr. Goldsmith:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Dan Ngo

Program Analyst
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

 

In Re: 

 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO 

as representative of 

 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO 

 

Debtor 

PROMESA 

TITLE III 

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

 In Re: 

 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO 

 

as representative of 

 

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER 

AUTOHORITY 

 

Debtor 

TITLE III 

No. 17 BK 4780-LTS 

Court Filing Relates Only to PREPA 

and Shall only be Filed Case No. 17- 

BK-4780 (LTS) and Main Case 17- 

BK-3283 (LTS) 

MOTION SUBMITTING CERTIFIED ENGLISH TRANSLATION 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

COMES NOW Master Link Corporation (“Movant” or “ML”), through the 

undersigned counsel and very respectfully states and prays:

1. On April 27th, 2018, Movant ML filed a “Reply to PREPA’s Objections to 

Motion for Relief of Stay”, together with a Spanish language Exhibit. Dkt. 2975. On that 

same day, ML filed a motion for leave to file some document in the Spanish language 

and requesting a short extension of time to submit its certified translations. Dkt. 2976. 

2. The extension requested for Movant to submit the certified translation is 

due on May 7th, 2018. Attached to the present motion is the certified English translation 

of Exhibit A. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2984 Filed:04/30/18 Entered:04/30/18 20:25:04 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested from this Honorable Court to accept 

the certified English translation attached hereto. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this date, I have electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of 

such filing to counsel of record. 

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 30th day of April, 2018. 

 S/Henry Vázquez Irizarry 

USDC No. 205011 

Bufete Vázquez Irizarry, CSP 

Urb. Villa Fontana Park 

Calle Parque Luis M. Rivera 5 HH6 

Carolina, PR 00983 

Tel. (787) 724-7514 / 787-645-2241 

Fax (888) 518-1318 

hvilaw@gmail.com 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2984 Filed:04/30/18 Entered:04/30/18 20:25:04 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
RIA TSD's 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 11/30/2011 05:14 PM 

 Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Amanda CurryBrown, Bryan Hubbell, Amy Lamson 

 

Cortney -- 

Attached are the TSD's for the RIA. 

Thanks. 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450 

Resource Adequacy and Reliability MATS_1123.docx 

EPA454-R_11_009.pdf 

MATS Feasibility TSD 1123.docx 

MATS_Final_Emissions_Modeling_TSD_22Nov2011.docx
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.82

                             EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                                 MIRANT SERVICES
                      BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN

         WHEREAS, Mirant Services, LLC (the "Company") heretofore adopted the
Mirant Services Bargaining Unit Employee Savings Plan (the "Plan"), effective
December 19, 2000, and subsequently amended and restated effective as of April
2, 2001;

         WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to provide that,
effective April 1, 2003, no new investments may be made in the Company Stock
Fund (as that term is defined in the Plan) under the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Americas Benefits Committee (the "Committee") is
authorized pursuant to Section 15.1 of the Plan to amend the Plan at any time,
provided such amendment does not involve a substantial increase in cost to the
Company.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows, to be
effective as of April 1, 2003:

                                        I

         EFFECTIVE AS OF APRIL 1, 2003, SECTION 8.1 OF THE PLAN SHALL BE DELETED
IN ITS ENTIRETY AND REPLACED WITH THE FOLLOWING NEW SECTION 8.1:

8.1      Investment Funds. The Investment Funds shall be selected from time to
time by the Qualified Plans Investment Review Committee (the "Investment Review
Committee"). In addition to such other Investment Funds selected by the
Investment Review Committee, the Investment Funds shall include the "Company
Stock Fund." The Company Stock Fund shall be invested and reinvested in Common
Stock, provided that funds applicable to the purchase of Common Stock pending
investment of such funds may be temporarily invested in short-term United States
Government obligations, other obligations guaranteed by the United States
Government, commercial paper, or certificates of deposit, and, if the Trustee so
determines, may be transferred to money market funds utilized by the Trustee for
qualified employee benefit trusts. Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective
April 1, 2003, no new investments may be made in the Company Stock Fund and,
should a Participant elect to reduce the portion of his Account that is invested
in the Company Stock Fund, he may not again reinvest any additional assets in
the Company Stock Fund.

                                       II.

         EXCEPT AS AMENDED HEREIN BY THIS EIGHTH AMENDMENT, THE PLAN SHALL
REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AS AMENDED AND RESTATED BY THE COMPANY PRIOR TO
THE ADOPTION OF THIS EIGHTH AMENDMENT.


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee, through a duly authorized officer of
the Company, has adopted this Eighth Amendment to the Plan this 25th day of
March, 2003 to be effective as of April 1, 2003.

                                               MIRANT SERVICES, LLC



                                               By:     /s/ Dianne Davenport

                                               Title:  VP, Human Resources


                                       2
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4161 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for inadmissibility 

for certain aliens seeking citizenship for children by giving birth in 

the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 2, 2020 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself and Mrs. LOEFFLER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

for inadmissibility for certain aliens seeking citizenship 

for children by giving birth in the United States, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ban Birth Tourism 

5 Act of 2020’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4161 IS

1 SEC. 2. INADMISSIBILITY FOR ALIENS SEEKING CITIZEN2 SHIP FOR CHILDREN BY GIVING BIRTH IN 

3 THE UNITED STATES. 

4 Section 212(a)(10) of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(10)) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(F) ALIENS SEEKING CITIZENSHIP FOR

8 CHILDREN BY GIVING BIRTH IN THE UNITED

9 STATES.— 

10 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Any alien seeking 

11 admission as a nonimmigrant under sec12 tion 101(a)(15)(B) for the primary pur13 pose of obtaining United States citizenship 

14 for a child by giving birth to the child in 

15 the United States is inadmissible. 

16 ‘‘(ii) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.— 

17 Nothing in this subparagraph may be con18 strued to render inadmissible an alien 

19 seeking legitimate medical treatment relat20 ing to childbirth if obtaining citizenship for 

21 the child is not the primary purpose for 

22 seeking admission.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,366]


California Shirt Sales, Inc., Fullerton, CA; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on February 22, 2000 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on behalf of workers at California Shirt Sales, Inc., 
Fullerton, California.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
is already in effect (TA-W-37,208A). Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 10th day of April 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-10584 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
§ 25.483 One-gear landing conditions. For the one-gear landing conditions, the airplane is assumed to be in the level attitude and to contact the ground on one main landing gear, in accordance with Figure 4 of Appendix A of this part. In this attitude— ( a ) The ground reactions must be the same as those obtained on that side under § 25.479(d)(1), and
( b ) Each unbalanced external load must be reacted by airplane inertia in a rational or conservative manner.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-91, 62 FR 40705, July 29, 1997]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2738

_____________________________ O SCAR L. F OSTER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Tatiana Salvador , Judge

. March 1, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OWE , B ILBREY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Oscar L. Foster, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley B. Moody , Attorney General, Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pat e, Bureau Chief
, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
August 27, 2015

Henrik Weber

observe productions

1003 Hazel C our t

Chesapeake, VA 23325

Dear Mr. Weber :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

part 21 and § § 61.113(a) and (b), 61.133(a), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103(b)(1), 91.119(c),

91.121, 91.151, 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) 91.409(a)(2) of Title 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you

should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your June 11, 2015, exemption request on behalf of observe productions filed in

D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2373 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the requ est would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps an swer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 d ays before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
§ 1212.604 Social security numbers. ( a ) It is unlawful for NASA to deny to individuals any rights, benefits, or privileges provided by law because of the individuals' refusal to disclose their social security numbers, except where: ( 1 ) The disclosure is required by law; or
( 2 ) The disclosure is from a system of records in existence and operating before January 1, 1975, and was required under statute or regulation adopted before that date to verify the identity of the individual(s).
( b ) Any time individuals are requested to disclose their social security numbers, NASA shall indicate whether that disclosure is mandatory or voluntary, by what authority the numbers are requested, and what uses will be made of them.
( c ) When sending physical mail, NASA will adhere to the following: ( 1 ) Social Security account numbers shall not be visible on the outside of any package sent by mail.
( 2 ) A document sent by mail may only include the Social Security account number of an individual if it is determined by the Administrator that the inclusion of a Social Security account number is necessary.
( 3 ) The inclusion of a Social Security account number of an individual on a document sent by mail is necessary when— ( i ) Required by law; or
( ii ) Necessary to identify a specific individual and no adequate substitute is available.
( 4 ) Social Security account numbers must be partially redacted in documents sent by mail whenever feasible.
[57 FR 4928, Feb. 11, 1992, as amended at 87 FR 71240, Nov. 22, 2022]