2006 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 4-28-2006 

# U SA v . D ' Am ario P r e c e de nt i al or N on-P r e c e de nt i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 06-1498

F o llow thi s and a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi ll anova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2006

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e and ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i ll anova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2006 D e c i sion s b y an author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i ll anova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C arl s on@l a

w . vi ll anova . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . D ' Am ar io " (2006). 2006 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1197. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi ll anova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2006/1197BP S - 1 8 7 NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

________________ N o. 06- 1498

________________ UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. A R T H U R D ’A M A R IO , II I, A ppel l ant

________________ O n A p p ea l Fro m the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt

Fort he D i s t r i ctof N ew J er s ey ( D . C . C i v. N o. 01- cr - 00346) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e J os eph E. I r enas

________________ Subm i t t ed ForPoss i bl e Sum m aryA ct i on U n d e r T h ir d C ir c u it L .A .R . 2 7 .4 a n d I.O .P . 1 0 .6

A pr i l 13, 2006 B efor e: SC I R I C A , C hi ef J udge, R E N D E L L and A M B R O , C i r cui tJ udges ( Fi l ed A pr i l 28, 2006)

________________ OP I NI ON

________________ P E R C UR I AM A rth u r D ’A m a rio a p p e a ls f ro m th e D istric t C o u rt’s o rd e r d e n y in g h is m o tio n to s t ayorr evoke hi s s upervi s ed r el eas e. B eca us e D ’ A m ar i o’ s appea l pr es ent s no s ubs t ant i al q u e s t i o n , we wi l l s u mma r i l ya f f i r m.A ccordi ng t o D ’A m ari o, his t erm of incarcer at i on for the sup ervi sed rel ease 1 r evoca t i on ended on February10, 2006. A ft erhe fi l ed a not i ce of appea l r egar di ng the D i s t r i ctC our t ’ s deni al of hi s m ot i on, 2 D ’ A m ar i o fi l ed an e m er gencym ot i on i n t hi s C our t , w hi ch w e deni ed. D ’ A m ar i o v. U n it ed S tat es, N o . 0 6 -14 9 8 (F eb . 8 , 2 0 0 6 ). 2 B eca us e w e w r i t e pr i m ar i l yfort he part i es , t he fa ct s of thi s cas e nee d notbe r ecount ed i n det ai l . T he bac kgr ound of thi s cas e ca n be found a tU ni t ed St at es v. D ’A m ario, 40 3 F . S u p p . 2 d 3 6 1 (D . N . J. 2 0 0 5 ). In 2 0 0 5 , the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt fort he D i s t r i ctof R hode I s l and r evoked D ’ A m ar i o’ s s upervi s ed r el eas e af t erhe vi ol at ed the c o n d it ion s o f th at release . S ee U n it ed S tat es v . D ’A m ario, 41 2 F . 3 d 2 5 3 (1st C ir . 1 2005) . O n J anuary17, 2006, D ’ A m ar i o m oved i n t he D i s t r i ctof N ew J er s eyt o pr event hi s r el eas e fr om pr i s on. B eca us e he a ppear s t o have c hal l enged the comm ence m entof 2 h is s u p e rv ise d re lea se in th e w ro n g ju risd ictio n , the D istric t C o u rt p ro p e rlyd e n ied h is m ot i on. Up o n h i s i n i t i a l r e l e a s e f r o m p r i s o n D’ Ama r i o b e g a n s e rv i n g t wo c o n c u r r e n tt e r ms of s upervi s ed r el eas e, one fr om a convi ct i on i n t he D i s t r i ctof N ew J er s ey , t he otherfr om t he D i s t r i ctof R hode I s l and. O n M ay2, 2003, t he D i s t r i ctof N ew J er s eyt r ans ferr ed j ur i s di ct i on overD ’ A m ar i o’ s s upervi s ed r el eas e pur s uantt o 18 U . S. C . § 3605 t o t he D is tr ic t o f

R h o d e Is la n d . U n ite d S ta te s v . D ’A m a ri o , N o . 0 1 -0 3 4 6 (D .N .J . M a y2 , 2 0 0 3 ). T hus , t he D i s t r i ctof N ew J er s eyno l ongerhas j ur i s di ct i on t o pr ovi de the r el i ef thathe s eeks and pr oper l ydeni ed hi s m ot i on.3

I n s hor t , upon cons i der at i on of the r ecor d, w e conc l ude thathi s appea l pr es ent s us w ith n o s u b s ta n tia l q u e s tio n . S e e T h ir d C ir c u it L .A .R . 2 7 .4 a n d I.O .P . 1 0 .6 . A cc o rdin g ly , w e w il l aff irm the D istri ct C o u rt ’s ord er.