alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 250/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 250 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5831 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 250

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5831 July 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | Council |
| 2015/C 250/01 | Council Recommendations — ‘Promoting the use of and sharing of best practices on cross-border videoconferencing in the area of justice in the Member States and at EU level’ | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RECOMMENDATIONS

Council

2015/C 250/01

Council Recommendations — ‘Promoting the use of and sharing of best practices on cross-border videoconferencing in the area of justice in the Member States and at EU level’

1

---

| | II   Information |
| --- | --- |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 250/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7674 — Talanx/NORD/LB/Caplantic) (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2015/C 250/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7330 — Mitsubishi Heavy Industries/Siemens/Metal Technologies JV) (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2015/C 250/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7667 — Danaher/Pall) (
  1
  ) | 7 |

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 250/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7674 — Talanx/NORD/LB/Caplantic) (
  1
  )

1

6

2015/C 250/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7330 — Mitsubishi Heavy Industries/Siemens/Metal Technologies JV) (
  1
  )

1

6

2015/C 250/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7667 — Danaher/Pall) (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 250/05 | Euro exchange rates | 8 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 250/05

Euro exchange rates

8

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 250/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7672 — Volkswagen Financial Services/Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria/Volkswagen Credit Compania Financiera) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 9 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 250/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7672 — Volkswagen Financial Services/Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria/Volkswagen Credit Compania Financiera) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH

C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50855

Summary Calendar

RUSSELL HICKERSON, Trustee,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PHILADELPHIA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(MO-97-CV-192)

March 25, 1999

Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Russell Hickerson appeals an adverse summary judgment in this action

alleging breach of an insurance contract and several extra-cont r actual claims.

For the reasons assigned, we affirm.

We review de novo the trial court’s grant of su mmary judgment,

conducting a plenary review of the record and considering the evidence in the1 International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s, Inc. , 939 F.2d 1257 (5 th Cir. 1991).

2 Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242 (1986).

2 light most favorable to the non-movant. 1 If we find no genuine dispute of

material fact, we deem summary judgment appropriate. 2

Our review of the record and briefs discloses no reversible error and,

accordingly, on the facts as found, the authorities cited, and analysis made by the

district court in its thorough Order on Motion for Summary Judgment signed and

filed on July 27, 1998, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 18 02

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Sh au np en Zho u ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt
v. In te rn at io na l Bu si ne ss Mac hi ne s C or po rat io n ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e North ern Dis tri ctof I owa- Dub uque

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 28 , 20 17 Fil ed : J an ua ry

12 , 20 18 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, MURPHY, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM. Sh au np en Zho u ap pe a l s a fte r th e di st ric t co urt adve rs el y gr an te d su m m ary 1 jud gm en t i n h is em

pl oym en t-d is cri m in at io n a ct io n.
The Hon or ab le Lin da R. Rea de , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e North ern 1 Dis tri ctof I owa .A f

t e r care fu l de no vo rev ie w, se e Gibson v. Am. Greetings Corp. , 670 F.3d 844 , 852 (8th Cir. 2012) , we co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co urt’s di sp os it io n of Zho u’s cl ai m s was ap pr op ria te fo r th e reas on s st at ed by th e di st ric t co urt. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 29, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00049-CV

PARKWAY CHEVROLET, INC., Appellant

V.

PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND 

KRISTEN DUCHARME, Appellees

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-51182

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 8, 2018. The clerk’s record 

was filed March 13, 2019. No reporter’s record or brief was filed.

On September 5, 2019, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant 

filed a brief on or before September 20, 2019, the court would dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
2

Appellant filed no brief or other response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
# Official Journal C 69/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 69 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6123 February 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 69

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6123 February 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 69/01 | Statutes of the European Marine Biological Resource Centre — European Research Infrastructure Consortium (EMBRC-ERIC) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 69/01

Statutes of the European Marine Biological Resource Centre — European Research Infrastructure Consortium (EMBRC-ERIC)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 69/02 | Euro exchange rates | 22 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 69/02

Euro exchange rates

22

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 69/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8606 — ELG Haniel/Iberinox/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 23 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 69/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8606 — ELG Haniel/Iberinox/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

23

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 27.1317 High-intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF) Protection. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, each electrical and electronic system that performs a function whose failure would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the rotorcraft must be designed and installed so that— ( 1 ) The function is not adversely affected during and after the time the rotorcraft is exposed to HIRF environment I, as described in appendix D to this part;
( 2 ) The system automatically recovers normal operation of that function, in a timely manner, after the rotorcraft is exposed to HIRF environment I, as described in appendix D to this part, unless this conflicts with other operational or functional requirements of that system;
( 3 ) The system is not adversely affected during and after the time the rotorcraft is exposed to HIRF environment II, as described in appendix D to this part; and
( 4 ) Each function required during operation under visual flight rules is not adversely affected during and after the time the rotorcraft is exposed to HIRF environment III, as described in appendix D to this part.
( b ) Each electrical and electronic system that performs a function whose failure would significantly reduce the capability of the rotorcraft or the ability of the flightcrew to respond to an adverse operating condition must be designed and installed so the system is not adversely affected when the equipment providing these functions is exposed to equipment HIRF test level 1 or 2, as described in appendix D to this part.
( c ) Each electrical and electronic system that performs a function whose failure would reduce the capability of the rotorcraft or the ability of the flightcrew to respond to an adverse operating condition, must be designed and installed so the system is not adversely affected when the equipment providing these functions is exposed to equipment HIRF test level 3, as described in appendix D to this part.
( d ) Before December 1, 2012, an electrical or electronic system that performs a function whose failure would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of a rotorcraft may be designed and installed without meeting the provisions of paragraph (a) provided— ( 1 ) The system has previously been shown to comply with special conditions for HIRF, prescribed under § 21.16, issued before December 1, 2007;
( 2 ) The HIRF immunity characteristics of the system have not changed since compliance with the special conditions was demonstrated; and
( 3 ) The data used to demonstrate compliance with the special conditions is provided.
[Doc. No. FAA-2006-23657, 72 FR 44026, Aug. 6, 2007]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3948 

To amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native 

Children Act to extend the deadline for a report by the Alyce Spotted 

Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2020 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children Act to extend the deadline 

for a report by the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter 

Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALYCE SPOTTED BEAR AND WALTER SOBOLEFF 

4 COMMISSION ON NATIVE CHILDREN REPORT. 

5 Section 3(f) of the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter 

6 Soboleff Commission on Native Children Act (Public Law 

7 114–244; 130 Stat. 987) is amended, in the matter preVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:51 Jun 25, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3948.IS S3948

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3948 IS

1 ceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘3 years’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘5 years’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit D

Client Claim # Secured Amount BKC # Chapter Notes BKC Claim #

Ada Lopez Santos 66 $25,000.00 - - -

Angela Rivera Soto 67 $20,877.95 14-09785 13 Agreement for Surrender of Collateral approved 4/1/2015 5-1

Aracelis Cabrera Alicea 68 $17,715.43 15-08054 13 Agreement for Surrender of Collateral approved 2/26/2018 19-2

Armando Guzman Villanueva 69 $20,550.30 14-06485 13 Agreement for Surrender of Collateral approved 1/16/2015 8-1

Axel Muñiz Ruíz 70 $19,500.00 13-09422 13 Agreement for Surrender of Collateral approved 4/8/2014 5-1

Carlos Torres Perez 71 $11,933.24 - - -

Carmen Rodriguez Fuentes 72 $16,331.53 14-01011 13 Surrender of colateral, confirmed plan 4/25/2014 6-1

Andres Tapia Sarante 74 $17,452.80 16-04603 7 Discharge, 9/8/2016 1-1

Carlos Marrero Narvaez 75 $4,747.36 - - -

Isander Carrasquillo Colon 76 $14,016.60 16-01513 7 Discharge, 6/13/2016 2-1

Laura Reynoso Esquilin 77 $21,050.61 16-07095 13 Agreement for Surrender of Collateral approved 5/11/2017 4-1

Rafaela Santiago Fernadez 79 $15,629.94 - - -

Wanda Gonzalez Pacheco 80 $10,513.77 16-02203 7 Discharge, 6/29/2016 3-1

Yasil Pastrana Santiago 81 $14,951.07 17-04130 13 Agreement for Surrender of Collateral approved 5/7/2018 5-1

Eddie Perez Gonzalez 82 $16,716.50 - - -

Edwin Rivas Fernandez 83 $18,766.72 16-03747 7 Discharge 9/1/2016

Darmy Ayuso Torres 84 $8,040.52 - - -

Israel Sanchez Mulero 85 $16,945.00 - - -

Javier Piñero González 86 $9,020.00 13-04076 7 Discharge, 9/5/2013 2-1

Jose Torres Mora 87 $17,901.21 13-10663 13 Surrender of collateral, confirmed plan 4/9/2014 2-1

Luis Navarro Gonzalez 88 $8,091.42 16-06128 13 Dismissed 7/10/2017 10-1

Manuel Irizarry Rodriguez 89 $15,699.98 14-04971 13 Surrender of collateral, confirmed plan 2/11/2015 6-1

María Rodríguez Negrón 90 $6,258.02 15-04539 7 Discharge, 9/22/2015 2-1

Martin Tello Ramos 91 $15,386.98 18-00922 7 Discharge, 5/22/2018

Nilsa Rosario De Jesus 92 $12,026.33 - - -

Rafael Matos García 93 $19,362.91 14-02547 7 Discharge, 7/8/2014 2-1

Ricardo Centeno Aguila 94 $6,906.00 14-01559 13 Surrender of collateral, confirmed plan 4/30/2014 9-1

Samuel Aviles Rodriguez 95 $12,136.99 - - -

Victor Rivera Padila 96 $17,706.07 - - -

Wilfredo Rosario Hernandez 97 $16,012.17 15-00362 13 Agreement for Surrender of Collateral approved 5/20/2015 6-1

Yanitza Vargas Ramos 98 $10,150.00 16-01122 13 Surrender of collateral, confirmed plan 6/30/2016 4-1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4156-4 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 23:25:56 Desc:

Exhibit List of Claims Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 24.1



POWER OF ATTORNEY



WHEREAS, the undersigned officers and directors of ITXC Corp. (ITXC) desire to authorize Tom Evslin and Theodore M. Weitz to act as their attorneys-in-fact
and agents, for the purpose of executing and filing the annual report described below, including all amendments and supplements thereto,



NOW, THEREFORE,



KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Tom Evslin and Anthony Servidio, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full
power of substitution and re-substitution, to sign the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, including any and all amendments and supplements to such Annual report, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite
and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this power of attorney in the following capacities as of the 15th day of March 2004.



|                        |  |                                                
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Signature               |  | Title                                          
|/s/ Tom Evslin          |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|Tom Evslin              |  |                                                
|                        | 
|/s/ Frank Gill          |  | Director                                       
|Frank Gill              |  |                                                
|                        | 
|/s/ Edward B. Jordan    |  | Director                                       
|Edward B. Jordan        |  |                                                
|                        | 
|/s/ Leo J. Cyr          |  | Director                                       
|Leo Cyr                 |  |                                                
|                        | 
|/s/ Frederick R. Wilson |  | Director                                       
|Frederick R. Wilson     |  |
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-30558

_____________________

GRUPO NOVA SA, United States of

America for the use and benefit

of,

Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee,

versus

CONTRATOS Y MANTENIMIENTOS, SA;

ASSA COMPANIA GENERAL DE SEGUROS,

SA,

Defendants - Appellees-Cross-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-1630)

_________________________________________________________________

February 11, 1998

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

All parties to this action represented to the district court

that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over this matter and

that the Eastern District of Louisiana was an improper venue in

which to litigate the case; in short, the parties effectively

represented to the court that there was no case or controversy
2

before it. Based on this representation, the district court

dismissed the case for want of subject matter jurisdiction. On

appeal, all parties now contend that the district court possessed

subject matter jurisdiction and that the dismissal was improper.

We refuse to allow the parties to assign error to the district

court when that court entered the order of dismissal for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction based on the parties’ stated position.

We note that a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is

without prejudice, allowing this action to be filed in a proper

forum. For these reasons, the order of the district court

dismissing this case is

 

A F F I R M E D.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)

Title:  **NSP Termination Act**
 
SuDocNumber:Y1.1/8:112-32/
Item Number:1008-I (online)
CGP SystemNumber: 000813970
 
Part 1 | Part 2
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 07a0175n.06

Filed: March 2, 2007

No. 06-3476

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

LUCRETIA G. VINTILLA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

On Appeal from the 

v. United States District Court for 

the Northern District of Ohio

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________

Before: KENNEDY, BATCHELDER, and CLAY, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM. Lucretia G. Vintilla appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment

in favor of defendant Safeco Insurance Company and denial of her own summary judgment motion.

After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court concludes that

issuance of a panel opinion would not serve any jurisprudential purpose. Thus, we affirm the district

court’s thorough and well-reasoned decision for the reasons stated within that opinion.
§ 161.501 Scope. ( a ) This subpart describes the procedures to terminate eligibility for airport grant funds and authority to impose or collect passenger facility charges for an airport operator's failure to comply with the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (49 U.S.C. App. 2151 *et seq.*) or this part. These procedures may be used with or in addition to any judicial proceedings initiated by the FAA to protect the national aviation system and related Federal interests.
( b ) Under no conditions shall any airport operator receive revenues under the provisions of the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 or impose or collect a passenger facility charge under section 1113(e) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 if the FAA determines that the airport is imposing any noise or access restriction not in compliance with the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 or this part. Recision of, or a commitment in writing signed by an authorized official of the airport operator to rescind or permanently not enforce, a noncomplying restriction will be treated by the FAA as action restoring compliance with the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 or this part with respect to that restriction.
Exhibit D 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:278-4 Filed:06/08/17 Entered:06/08/17 16:02:40 Desc:

Exhibit D: Certified Translation of Administrative Bulletin EO-2016-30 Page 1 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:278-4 Filed:06/08/17 Entered:06/08/17 16:02:40 Desc:

Exhibit D: Certified Translation of Administrative Bulletin EO-2016-30 Page 2 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:278-4 Filed:06/08/17 Entered:06/08/17 16:02:40 Desc:

Exhibit D: Certified Translation of Administrative Bulletin EO-2016-30 Page 3 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:278-4 Filed:06/08/17 Entered:06/08/17 16:02:40 Desc:

Exhibit D: Certified Translation of Administrative Bulletin EO-2016-30 Page 4 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:278-4 Filed:06/08/17 Entered:06/08/17 16:02:40 Desc:

Exhibit D: Certified Translation of Administrative Bulletin EO-2016-30 Page 5 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:278-4 Filed:06/08/17 Entered:06/08/17 16:02:40 Desc:

Exhibit D: Certified Translation of Administrative Bulletin EO-2016-30 Page 6 of 6