alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Annual Report of Northern Offshore Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Iain Cawte, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: March 29, 2004


/s/ Iain Cawte
Chief Financial Officer

02089.0009 #474410
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-22317, 333-48909, 333-66435 and 333-66437) 
of EarthLink Network, Inc. of our report dated February 16, 1999, except as 
to Note 14, which is as of February 24, 1999, appearing on page F-2 of 
EarthLink Network, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 1998.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Century City, California
March 30, 1999
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification**
I, Steven A. Odom, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended March 31, 2004 of Verso Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 10, 2004    /s/ Steven A. Odom
#### ATLANTIC MILLS OF RHODE ISLAND v. UNITED STATES

[78 C.Cls. 219; 291 U.S. 676]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court March 5, 1934.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10699]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m. (EDT) May 8, 2000.

Place: 4th Floor, Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   
    1. National Finance Center record keeping and New TSP System.
    2. Congressional/Agency/Participant Liaison.
    3. Benefits and Investments.
    4. Participant Communications.
    5. Approval of the minutes of the April 10, 2000, Board member 
meeting.
    6. Thrift Savings Plan Activity Report by the Executive Director.
    7. Approval of the Update of the FY 2000 Budget and FY 2001 
Estimates.
    8. Investment Policy Review.
    9. Status of Audit Recommendations.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: April 25, 2000.
Salomon Gomez,
Associate General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 00-10699 Filed 4-25-00; 3:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-M
§ 25.801 Ditching. ( a ) If certification with ditching provisions is requested, the airplane must meet the requirements of this section and §§ 25.807(e), 25.1411, and 25.1415(a).
( b ) Each practicable design measure, compatible with the general characteristics of the airplane, must be taken to minimize the probability that in an emergency landing on water, the behavior of the airplane would cause immediate injury to the occupants or would make it impossible for them to escape.
( c ) The probable behavior of the airplane in a water landing must be investigated by model tests or by comparison with airplanes of similar configuration for which the ditching characteristics are known. Scoops, flaps, projections, and any other factor likely to affect the hydrodynamic characteristics of the airplane, must be considered.
( d ) It must be shown that, under reasonably probable water conditions, the flotation time and trim of the airplane will allow the occupants to leave the airplane and enter the liferafts required by § 25.1415. If compliance with this provision is shown by buoyancy and trim computations, appropriate allowances must be made for probable structural damage and leakage. If the airplane has fuel tanks (with fuel jettisoning provisions) that can reasonably be expected to withstand a ditching without leakage, the jettisonable volume of fuel may be considered as buoyancy volume.
( e ) Unless the effects of the collapse of external doors and windows are accounted for in the investigation of the probable behavior of the airplane in a water landing (as prescribed in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section), the external doors and windows must be designed to withstand the probable maximum local pressures.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29781, July 20, 1990]
§ 25.991 Fuel pumps. ( a ) *Main pumps.* Each fuel pump required for proper engine operation, or required to meet the fuel system requirements of this subpart (other than those in paragraph (b) of this section, is a main pump. For each main pump, provision must be made to allow the bypass of each positive displacement fuel pump other than a fuel injection pump (a pump that supplies the proper flow and pressure for fuel injection when the injection is not accomplished in a carburetor) approved as part of the engine.
( b ) *Emergency pumps.* There must be emergency pumps or another main pump to feed each engine immediately after failure of any main pump (other than a fuel injection pump approved as part of the engine).
#### Halsey, Administrator, *v.*Pinchard *et al.*

A replication in these words: “replication in short by consent,” is cured by verdict,

IN ERROR.

Turner,. Justice.

The error mainly relied on is the want of a formal replication to the plea of payment. The issue was joined in these words: “Replication and issue in short by consent.”

This is a very common mode of making up issues. As fair and full a trial can be had before the jury on this form, as if the replication was in due form; and although it would not have been good before the statute of jeofails, it is cured by that statute, being “insufficient pleading,” or “misjoining of issue.” It is not like the case of entire absence of á replication to a plea in bar.

The other errors assigned are *not relied*on, and it appears to us that they are not sustainable.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3543 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3543

  To limit liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
  Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 for service station dealers 
   with respect to the release or threatened release of recycled oil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2003

 Mr. Capuano (for himself, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
Sessions, Mr. Wynn, and Mr. Lynch) introduced the following bill; which 
 was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To limit liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
  Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 for service station dealers 
   with respect to the release or threatened release of recycled oil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

     Section 114(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9614(c)) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Prior to effective date.--No person (including the 
        United States or any State) may recover, under the authority of 
        subsection (a)(3) or (4) of section 107, from a service station 
        dealer for any response costs or damages resulting from a 
        release or threatened release of recycled oil, or use the 
        authority of section 106 against a service station dealer other 
        than a person described in subsection (a)(1) or (2) of section 
        107, with respect to any period between November 8, 1986, and 
        the effective date described in paragraph (4), if the service 
        station dealer had complied with all applicable laws and 
        regulations relating to the disposal of such oil.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, David P. Tomick, as Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SpectraSite,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
April 21, 2004        /s/ DAVID P. TOMICK           David P. Tomick     Executive Vice President*, Chief Financial Officer*     *and Assistant Secretary*    
51
§ 25.479 Level landing conditions. ( a ) In the level attitude, the airplane is assumed to contact the ground at forward velocity components, ranging from VL1 to 1.25 VL2 parallel to the ground under the conditions prescribed in § 25.473 with— ( 1 ) VL1 equal to VS0 (TAS) at the appropriate landing weight and in standard sea level conditions; and
( 2 ) VL2 equal to VS0 (TAS) at the appropriate landing weight and altitudes in a hot day temperature of 41 degrees F. above standard.
( 3 ) The effects of increased contact speed must be investigated if approval of downwind landings exceeding 10 knots is requested.
( b ) For the level landing attitude for airplanes with tail wheels, the conditions specified in this section must be investigated with the airplane horizontal reference line horizontal in accordance with Figure 2 of Appendix A of this part.
( c ) For the level landing attitude for airplanes with nose wheels, shown in Figure 2 of Appendix A of this part, the conditions specified in this section must be investigated assuming the following attitudes: ( 1 ) An attitude in which the main wheels are assumed to contact the ground with the nose wheel just clear of the ground; and
( 2 ) If reasonably attainable at the specified descent and forward velocities, an attitude in which the nose and main wheels are assumed to contact the ground simultaneously.
( d ) In addition to the loading conditions prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section, but with maximum vertical ground reactions calculated from paragraph (a), the following apply: ( 1 ) The landing gear and directly affected attaching structure must be designed for the maximum vertical ground reaction combined with an aft acting drag component of not less than 25% of this maximum vertical ground reaction.
( 2 ) The most severe combination of loads that are likely to arise during a lateral drift landing must be taken into account. In absence of a more rational analysis of this condition, the following must be investigated: ( i ) A vertical load equal to 75% of the maximum ground reaction of § 25.473 must be considered in combination with a drag and side load of 40% and 25% respectively of that vertical load.
( ii ) The shock absorber and tire deflections must be assumed to be 75% of the deflection corresponding to the maximum ground reaction of § 25.473(a)(2). This load case need not be considered in combination with flat tires.
( 3 ) The combination of vertical and drag components is considered to be acting at the wheel axle centerline.
[Amdt. 25-91, 62 FR 40705, July 29, 1997; Amdt. 25-91, 62 FR 45481, Aug. 27, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                           12110
<SECURITIES>                                     42263
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8240
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     114384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                182982
<PP&E>                                          170790
<DEPRECIATION>                                   78117
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  281797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            34578
<BONDS>                                          59132
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      20000
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                      145636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    281797
<SALES>                                          85129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 85129
<CGS>                                            65152
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    27491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   424
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7938)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3255)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4683)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
BS, 

IDAH O rAllSBICIOHA l 41 1 ^ORT 

MIKE CRAPO 

rrt til-- Et llJ l ncr C<-i.i.u*t Hnittd States ,^iwm 

VVAEHINGTC'h. DC I-HIO 

August iy, 201U 

=twi?.nij'.iF,>it iij: j =u3LiL-'.'.o=<.;> 

F.wnr.Fi 

INhlAN AFFAIRS 

The Hcnorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary' of Transportation 

U.S. Depariment DlTfansocrtalion 

400 f Sireet S.W. 

Washington, OC 20590 

Dear Sscretary LaHood: 

I am writing in support of theapplicaiion for grant funds unde- the Small Community 

AirSer/ice Development Grant Progrsm submitted by the Idaho Falis^ Idaho 

Regional Airport. I his month, Idaho Kails will lose its ser\'ioe from Horizon Air, 

connecting passengers to Boise, Portland. Seattle. Spokane and Northern California. 

The diECon:inuance o" service was 3 factor of internal siriing reconfiguration and not 

a lack of demand in the area. 

> 

O-- ) ;C:J 

CO 

This rtrestbounc service is critical to the Idaho Falls business con-munity in that nost 

local companies do business in the Northwest region. Idaho Halls is home to the 

Department of Energy Idaho National Laboratory and the managino oornpanibs. 

Traveler census estimates show more than 400,000 for the Easterr Idaho Region 

and the nearest hub airport is over a ttiree hour drive away, 

I understand that the City of Idaho Falls has Identified tivo or three air earners that 

may be able to provide westbound service for the region. If successful in obtaining 

the requested grant funds, the Crty vyill be able to approach those airlines with 

revenus guarantees, cost reduclicns, introductory fares, and extensive advertising to 

initiate the start up of new ser/ice to tJie community. 

Idaho Falls is my hometo^vn and I fully understand and appreciate the importance of 

westbound commercial serS/ics to the business community and citizens of the region. 

I urge the Departmen-. of Transportation to g ve tiis proposal all cue consideration. 

Sincerely, 

P/lichael L). Grapo 

United Stales Smialui 

MDC'rrt 

•avia r.C"--i.CL 

:4%arf\^«ri.::^«l-: 

.'.Jll|M - LV^f ^ 

•;:i;;t-.-ii ; 

o>rij:i> :t<»-u 

i •..»r\>r.-ur»r 

I'jla'JUi^ 

tkk^OCC^ U 

Jl^Jli-V.l'.i.'rt^ 

rt^^Zn^xyJZ. : 

j,K.n i 

• tii>«iccin 

fj- l iu:> It" 

,il i .i» j : 

'.Ji.-' 4 

rt»r:-.-w..ntJiiii 

t.-;i»iti lo-j " »:•-

."aVA.(ri'tJl»n-« 

-..•ijv . 

lii-iJii:.;^; : 

V^'^XJMJ'^y.-

IlICL-r^r. 

:./.. U r 

jivrfs H L'«; i 

Idaho Falls Regional Airport - Small Community Air Service Development Grant - August 2010
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

PROMESA

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND Title III

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as a representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al. (Jointly Administered)

Debtors

 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

NOW comes creditor JOSÉ VÁZQUEZ FELICIANO represented by the undersigned 

attorney, to state as follows.

That pursuant to provisions of Rule 9010(b) of Bankruptcy Procedure, the appearing party 

notifies that it has retained the legal services of Osvaldo Toledo Martinez whose address is:

Osvaldo Toledo Martínez

PO Box 190938

San Juan PR 00919-0938

E-Mail: toledo.bankruptcy@gmail.com

Telephone No.: (787) 756-6395

Fax No.: (787) 767-7965

WHEREFORE, the appearing party respectfully prays that the Clerk of the Court takes notice of 

the appearance of the undersigned attorney and to notify him of all the proceedings in this case, 

including but not limited to copies of the petition, schedules, motions, and statements filed or to be filed 

in the above-referenced case and further prays that the name and address be added to the Master 

Address List kept in the above-captioned case.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3382 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 14:39:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and exact copy of the foregoing was filed electronically with 

the clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which in turn will send notification of such filing to all 

interested parties of record.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

At San Juan, Puerto Rico, this June 29, 2018.

/S/ Osvaldo Toledo Martínez

OSVALDO TOLEDO MARTÍNEZ, ESQ.

USDC No. 127905

PO Box 190938

San Juan PR 00919-0938

Tel: (787) 756-6395

Fax: (787) 767-7965

E-Mail: toledo.bankruptcy@gmail.com

Counsel for Creditor

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3382 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 14:39:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2