alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 23.2440 Powerplant fire protection. ( a ) A powerplant, auxiliary power unit, or combustion heater that includes a flammable fluid and an ignition source for that fluid must be installed in a designated fire zone.
( b ) Each designated fire zone must provide a means to isolate and mitigate hazards to the airplane in the event of fire or overheat within the zone.
( c ) Each component, line, fitting, and control subject to fire conditions must— ( 1 ) Be designed and located to prevent hazards resulting from a fire, including any located adjacent to a designated fire zone that may be affected by fire within that zone;
( 2 ) Be fire-resistant if carrying flammable fluid, gas or air, or is required to operate in the event of a fire; and
( 3 ) Be fireproof or enclosed by a fire proof shield if storing concentrated flammable fluids.
( d ) The applicant must provide a means to prevent hazardous quantities of flammable fluids from flowing into, within or through each designated fire zone. This means must— ( 1 ) Not restrict flow or limit operation of any remaining powerplant or auxiliary power unit, or equipment necessary for safety;
( 2 ) Prevent inadvertent operation; and
( 3 ) Be located outside the fire zone unless an equal degree of safety is provided with a means inside the fire zone.
( e ) A means to ensure the prompt detection of fire must be provided for each designated fire zone— ( 1 ) On a multiengine airplane where detection will mitigate likely hazards to the airplane; or
( 2 ) That contains a fire extinguisher.
( f ) A means to extinguish fire within a fire zone, except a combustion heater fire zone, must be provided for— ( 1 ) Any fire zone located outside the pilot's view;
( 2 ) Any fire zone embedded within the fuselage, which must also include a redundant means to extinguish fire; and
( 3 ) Any fire zone on a level 4 airplane.
[Doc. No. FAA-2015-1621, Amdt. 23-64, 81 FR 96689, Dec. 30, 2016, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. 23-65, 87 FR 75710, Dec. 9, 2022]
| (1)  | The      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                            |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      registrant. |

| August      3, 2009                                |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/Jeffrey      R. Immelt                          |   |
| Jeffrey      R. ImmeltChief      Executive Officer |   |
|                                     |   |
| /s/Keith      S. Sherin                            |   |
| Keith      S. SherinChief      Financial Officer   |   |

----
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-20348

Summary Calendar

____________

John T. Morris, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

State of Texas; Greg Abbott, Governor of the State of Texas; 

John B. Scott, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of 

Texas, 

Defendants—Appellees.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CV-3456

______________________________

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

John T. Morris filed a pro se civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 

asserting that partisan gerrymandering of his congressional district and 

dishonest media coverage violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment 

rights and seeking injunctive relief. Morris appeals the district court’s 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 6, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-20348 Document: 00516635815 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/06/2023
No. 22-20348

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) dismissal of his complaint without 

prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

Our review is de novo. See Griener v. United States, 900 F.3d 700, 703 

(5th Cir. 2018). Morris has not met his burden of showing that he has raised 

justiciable claims. See Rucho v. Common Cause, 139 S. Ct. 2484, 2493-2508 

(2019); Abbott v. Perez, 138 S. Ct. 2305, 2324 (2018); Mi Familia Vota v. 

Abbott, 977 F.3d 461, 469-70 (5th Cir. 2020). As such, we need not reach 

Morris’s challenge to the district court’s alternative finding that the 

defendants are entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity.

AFFIRMED. 

Case: 22-20348 Document: 00516635815 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/06/2023
EXHIBIT A 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2878-1 Filed:04/10/18 Entered:04/10/18 13:24:26 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 3
-1- 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

IN RE: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., 

Debtors.1

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO REPLY TO DOCKET ENTRY NO. 2863 

Upon consideration of the Urgent Motion of Assured Guaranty Corp., Assured 

Guaranty Municipal Corp. and National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation for Leave to 

Reply to Docket Entry No. 2863 (the “Motion”),2 the Court has concluded that the factual bases 

set forth in the Motion establish just cause for the relief granted herein; and after due deliberation 

and sufficient cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Motion is granted as set forth herein. 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number 

listed as a bankruptcy case number due to software limitations and the last four (4) digits of each 

Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (“Commonwealth”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy 

Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico 

Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of 

the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). 

2

 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to them in 

the Motion. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2878-1 Filed:04/10/18 Entered:04/10/18 13:24:26 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 3
-2- 

2. Objectors Assured Guaranty Corp., Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. 

and National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation may file a reply memorandum, not to exceed 

five (5) pages, to the Response to Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Objections of 

Assured Guaranty Corp., Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. and National Public Finance 

Guarantee Corporation to the Magistrate Judge’s February 26, 2018 Order (ECF No. 2863) by 

5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time) on April 16, 2018. 

 

Dated: , 2018 

 San Juan, Puerto Rico 

 

HONORABLE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2878-1 Filed:04/10/18 Entered:04/10/18 13:24:26 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 3 of 3
1

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MAX GROSSMAN,

 

 Appellant,

v.

CITY OF EL PASO,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00277-CV

Appeal from the

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2017-DCV2528)

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON ORDER

On October 24, 2019, Max Grossman filed an interlocutory appeal of the 384th District 

Court’s order denying his application for a temporary injunction in Trial Court Case No. 2017-

DCV2528. That appeal was docketed in this Court as Grossman v. City of El Paso, Cause No. 08-

19-00272-CV.

On October 30, 2019, the City of El Paso filed a “Cross-Notice of Accelerated Appeal” 

challenging the 384th District Court’s order denying the City’s plea to the jurisdiction, also in Trial 

Court Case No. 2017-DCV2528. That appeal was docketed in this Court as City of El Paso v. 

Grossman, Cause No. 08-19-00277-CV.

The City has moved to consolidate Cause No. 08-19-00277-CV and Cause No. 08-19-

00272-CV into one appeal. Grossman opposes the City’s motion to consolidate. We find good 
2

cause to consolidate the two appeals into one appeal. As such, the City’s motion to consolidate 

these two appeals is GRANTED.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that Cause No. 08-19-00277-CV be consolidated with Cause 

No. 08-19-00272-CV. We direct the Clerk of the Court to remove all documents from Cause No. 

08-19-00277-CV and refile them in Cause No. 08-19-00272-CV.

It is further ORDERED that all future pleadings be filed in and bear only Cause No. 08-

19-00272-CV. The consolidated proceedings will be captioned Grossman v. City of El Paso. 

Grossman will be referred to as the Appellant/Cross-Appellee. The City of El Paso will be referred 

to as the Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

It is further ORDERED that Local Rule 1 dealing with briefs in cross-appeals will generally 

apply to these proceedings. The Court’s previous briefing schedule is hereby WITHDRAWN. A 

modified briefing schedule superseding our prior briefing schedule will follow in the coming days 

once the status of the record is finally established.

This order is limited solely to the issue of the City’s motion to consolidate, is solely 

administrative in nature, and deals only with those issues explicitly mentioned herein. All other 

previous orders issued by this Court in Cause Nos. 08-19-00272-CV and 08-19-00277-CV, 

including orders related to emergency relief and record deadlines, remain in effect.

Finally, the Court observes that by virtue of this consolidation action, it is unnecessary to 

keep the case file in Cause No. 08-19-00277-CV open, since all matters that were originally 

docketed to be heard in that cause number have been re-docketed and will now be heard in Cause 

No. 08-19-00272-CV. As such, this Court ORDERS that Cause No. 08-19-00277-CV be 

dismissed for administrative purposes due to consolidation. See Jones v. Powers, No. 08-19-

00196-CV, 2019 WL 3491936, at *1 (Tex.App.--El Paso Aug. 1, 2019, no pet.)(mem. op.).
3

November 27, 2019 PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### § 135.217 IFR: Takeoff limitations.

No person may takeoff an aircraft under IFR from an airport where weather conditions are at or above takeoff minimums but are below authorized IFR landing minimums unless there is an alternate airport within 1 hour's flying time (at normal cruising speed, in still air) of the airport of departure.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.19


                          FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT


     THIS FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, dated as of the 26th day of November,
2001, to the Lease dated February 18, 1998, the First Supplemental Agreement
dated October 26, 1998, the Second Supplemental Agreement dated August 31, 1999,
the Third Supplemental Agreement dated September 14, 1999 and the Fourth
Supplemental Agreement dated May 1, 2000 by and between FIVE N ASSOCIATES of 40
Temple Street, Nashua, New Hampshire (Lessor) and SKILLSOFT CORPORATION of 20
Industrial Park Drive, Nashua, New Hampshire (Lessee).

     WHEREAS the Lessor and the Lessee desire to amend the Lease effective
November 26, 2001, as follows:

     Section 1 - Leased Premises: The Leased Premises shall include an
additional 1,683 square feet of space on the first floor.

     Section 3.1 - Rent: The annual rent shall be changed to One Hundred Sixty
Eight Thousand Four Hundred Forty and 32/00 Dollars ($168,440.32) and shall be
payable in monthly installments of Fourteen Thousand Seven Hundred Forty Nine
and 90/00 ($14,740.90).

     Section 3.3 - Pro-rata Share - The Lessee's pro-rata share shall be changed
to 84.638% and the additional monthly rent shall be changed to Six Thousand Nine
Hundred Thirty Six and 71/00 Dollars ($6,936.71).

     Section 11.2 - Use of the Premises:  The Lessee's parking percentage shall
be changed to 84.638.

     Section 13.1 - Taxes: The Lessees pro-rata share of real estate taxes and
assessments shall be changed to 84.643%

     Section 28.1 - Rent for Renewal: The rental amount used to calculate the
rent for the renewal term shall be changed to Fourteen Thousand Seven Hundred
Forty Nine and 90/00 Dollars ($14,749.90).

     Except as hereinabove amended, all the provisions of the above mentioned
Lease and all Supplemental Agreements shall remain in full force and effect.







<PAGE>
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Fifth Supplemental
Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.





                                           FIVE N ASSOCIATES


/s/ Barbara J. [Illegible]                 /s/ Q. Peter Nash
--------------------------                 ---------------------------------
Witness                                    Q. Peter Nash, Managing Partner




                                           SKILLSOFT CORPORATION


/s/ Thomas J. McDonald                     /s/ Charles E. Moran
--------------------------                 ---------------------------------
Witness                                    Charles E. Moran, President & CEO
§ 23.2125 Climb information. ( a ) The applicant must determine climb performance at each weight, altitude, and ambient temperature within the operating limitations— ( 1 ) For all single-engine airplanes;
( 2 ) For levels 1 and 2 high-speed multiengine airplanes and level 3 multiengine airplanes, following a critical loss of thrust on takeoff in the initial climb configuration; and
( 3 ) For all multiengine airplanes, during the enroute phase of flight with all engines operating and after a critical loss of thrust in the cruise configuration.
( b ) The applicant must determine the glide performance for single-engine airplanes after a complete loss of thrust.
<PAGE>   1

                                       29

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


Subsidiaries of JAWZ Inc, a Delaware Corporation:

o  JAWZ Canada Inc, an Alberta Corporation

o  JAWZ USA Inc, a Delaware Corporation

o  JAWZ Illinois Inc, an Illinois Corporation

o  JAWS Acquisition Corporation ("JAC"), an Alberta Corporation

o  JAWS Acquisition Canada Corporation ("JACC"), an Alberta Corporation


Subsidiaries of JAWS Acquisition Canada Corporation ("JACC"), an Alberta
Corporation:

o  4Comm.com Inc, an Ontario Corporation

o  General Network Systems Inc, an Ontario Corporation

o  Betach Systems Inc, an Alberta Corporation

o  Betach Advanced Systems Inc, an Alberta Corporation




                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

                             INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the use of our report dated February 20, 2001, with respect to the
financial statements of JAWZ Inc., in the Company's Annual Report (Form 10-K)
dated March 30, 2001.



Calgary, Canada                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 30, 2001                                       ---------------------
                                                     Chartered Accountants
exv10w3xay



 



EXHIBIT 10.3(a)



Schedule of officers of Digene Corporation entering into Employment Agreements



     The following officers of Digene Corporation entered into Employment
Agreements substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.3 to this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q during the quarter ended March 31, 2003:



	 	Attila Lorincz

Robert McG. Lilley

Belinda O. Patrick

Joseph P. Slattery

Linda Alexander

Susan M. Keese

Larry R. Wellman

C. Douglas White
§ 25.905 Propellers. ( a ) Each propeller must have a type certificate.
( b ) Engine power and propeller shaft rotational speed may not exceed the limits for which the propeller is certificated.
( c ) The propeller blade pitch control system must meet the requirements of §§ 35.21, 35.23, 35.42 and 35.43 of this chapter.
( d ) Design precautions must be taken to minimize the hazards to the airplane in the event a propeller blade fails or is released by a hub failure. The hazards which must be considered include damage to structure and vital systems due to impact of a failed or released blade and the unbalance created by such failure or release.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-54, 45 FR 60173, Sept. 11, 1980; Amdt. 25-57, 49 FR 6848, Feb. 23, 1984; Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29784, July 20, 1990; Amdt. 25-126, 73 FR 63345, Oct. 24, 2008]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 *Title:*
                     National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System. *OMB No.:*
                     0980-0256 and 0980-0229. *Description:*
                     The Child Abuse and Treatment Act (42 U.S.C. 5101 
                    *et seq.*) as amended requires States that receive the CAPTA State Child Abuse and Neglect Grant “to annually work with the Secretary to provide, to the maximum extent practicable, a report that includes (the 12 data items listed in the statute.” The National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS), administered by the Children's Bureau, meets this reporting requirement. The two components of the NCANDS, the Detailed Case Data Component (DCDC) and the Summary Data Component (SDC) are being updated in order to address all items in the legislation and to be consistent with each other. *Respondents:*
                     State Child Welfare Agencies. **Annual Burden Estimates**
Instrument
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses per respondent
Average 
                             burden hours per response
Total
                             burden 
                             hoursDCDC
30
1
130
3,900SDC
22
1
40
880Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours



4,780
 *Additional Information:*
                     Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW, Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. *OMB Comment:*
                     OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register.**
                     Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the 
                    ( print page 25337)
                    proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attn: Desk Officer for ACF. Dated: April 25, 2000. Bob Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 00-10694 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
§ 27.1557 Miscellaneous markings and placards. ( a ) *Baggage and cargo compartments, and ballast location.* Each baggage and cargo compartment, and each ballast location must have a placard stating any limitations on contents, including weight, that are necessary under the loading requirements.
( b ) *Seats.* If the maximum allowable weight to be carried in a seat is less than 170 pounds, a placard stating the lesser weight must be permanently attached to the seat structure.
( c ) *Fuel and oil filler openings.* The following apply: ( 1 ) Fuel filler openings must be marked at or near the filler cover with— ( i ) The word “fuel”;
( ii ) For reciprocating engine powered rotorcraft, the minimum fuel grade;
( iii ) For turbine engine powered rotorcraft, the permissible fuel designations; and
( iv ) For pressure fueling systems, the maximum permissible fueling supply pressure and the maximum permissible defueling pressure.
( 2 ) Oil filler openings must be marked at or near the filler cover with the word “oil”.
( d ) *Emergency exit placards.* Each placard and operating control for each emergency exit must be red. A placard must be near each emergency exit control and must clearly indicate the location of that exit and its method of operation.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-11, 41 FR 55471, Dec. 20, 1976]
Exhibit
10.48


 


January 3,
2003


 


 


Tier Technologies, Inc.


1350 Treat Boulevard


Suite 250


Walnut Creek, CA 94596


 


Attention: James L. Bildner, Chairman & CEO


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter
documents our agreement regarding certain revisions to my Employment Agreement
with Official Payments Corporation, dated as of July 18, 2002 (the “Original
Agreement” and, as amended by this letter, the “Agreement”).  Except as specifically amended herein, all
other terms of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


1)                                      The
third sentence of the preamble shall be amended in its entirety to read as
follows: “The end of the term of this Agreement is for the period from the
Effective Date to May 15, 2003, unless sooner terminated.”


 


Section 1.2 of the Agreement shall be amended and supplemented by
adding the following text:  “In addition
to the one-time bonus payment to be made on January 15, 2003, Employee will be
eligible to receive an additional one-time bonus payment in the amount of
$250,000, net of applicable withholdings and deductions.  Payment of this additional one-time bonus
will be made on May 15, 2003 and is contingent upon Employee being actively
employed by the Company as of May 15, 2003 or having been terminated by the
Company for any reason other than “for cause” as defined in Section 2.1(a)
(including, without limitation, by reason of Employee’s death or disability),
prior to May 15, 2003. Employee will not be eligible for such bonus if he
resigns or if the Company terminates his employment for cause prior to May 15,
2003.”


 


Please
confirm your agreement with the foregoing terms by signing the acknowledgment
below.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Michael P. Presto

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Michael P. Presto

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Acknowledged and Agreed:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  TIER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Laura B. DePole

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Print Name:

  	
  Laura B. DePole

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  CFO/Secretary