alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Knight Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Thomas M. Joyce, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    THOMAS M. JOYCEName:

Thomas M. JoyceTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

February 28, 2007




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 25.1363 Electrical system tests. ( a ) When laboratory tests of the electrical system are conducted— ( 1 ) The tests must be performed on a mock-up using the same generating equipment used in the airplane;
( 2 ) The equipment must simulate the electrical characteristics of the distribution wiring and connected loads to the extent necessary for valid test results; and
( 3 ) Laboratory generator drives must simulate the actual prime movers on the airplane with respect to their reaction to generator loading, including loading due to faults.
( b ) For each flight condition that cannot be simulated adequately in the laboratory or by ground tests on the airplane, flight tests must be made.
EXHIBIT B

Segal Engagement Letter

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 1 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 2 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 3 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 4 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 5 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 6 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 7 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 8 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 9 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 10 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 11 of 11
§ 133.22 Employment of former FAA employees. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, no certificate holder may knowingly employ or make a contractual arrangement which permits an individual to act as an agent or representative of the certificate holder in any matter before the Federal Aviation Administration if the individual, in the preceding 2 years— ( 1 ) Served as, or was directly responsible for the oversight of, a Flight Standards Service aviation safety inspector; and
( 2 ) Had direct responsibility to inspect, or oversee the inspection of, the operations of the certificate holder.
( b ) For the purpose of this section, an individual shall be considered to be acting as an agent or representative of a certificate holder in a matter before the agency if the individual makes any written or oral communication on behalf of the certificate holder to the agency (or any of its officers or employees) in connection with a particular matter, whether or not involving a specific party and without regard to whether the individual has participated in, or had responsibility for, the particular matter while serving as a Flight Standards Service aviation safety inspector.
( c ) The provisions of this section do not prohibit a certificate holder from knowingly employing or making a contractual arrangement which permits an individual to act as an agent or representative of the certificate holder in any matter before the Federal Aviation Administration if the individual was employed by the certificate holder before October 21, 2011.
[Doc. No. FAA-2008-1154, 76 FR 52236, Aug. 22, 2011]
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 17823 Not in labor force Number in thousands 16 to 24 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value**LNU05024887Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 16-24 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:07:28 PM)
SURFACE  TRANSPORTATION  BOARD       	   ☰✕
          - Proceedings & Actions              - Decisions
            - Filings
            - Environmental Comments
            - Dockets (Including Service Lists)
            - Recordations
            - E-Filing 
          - Reports & Data              - Economic Data
            - Rail Service Data
            - Demurrage & Accessorial Charges
            - Economic Reports & Studies
            - Railroad Cost Adjustment Factor (RCAF)
            - Uniform Rail Costing System (URCS)
            - Carload Waybill Sample
            - Agricultural Contract Summaries
            - Water Carrier Annual Certifications
            - Rail Infrastructure Project Reports 
          - Resources              - Need Assistance?                - Rail Customer and Public Assistance
              - How to File
              - Household Goods Moving 
            - Legal Resources
            - Litigation Alternatives
            - Environmental                - Environmental Overview
              - Historic Preservation Overview
              - Frequently Asked Questions
              - Third-Party Contracting 
            - Railroad Map Depot
            - Stakeholder Committees                - Railroad-Shipper Transportation  Advisory Council
              - Rail Energy Transportation Advisory Committee
              - National Grain Car Council
              - Passenger Rail Advisory Committee 
          - News & Communications              - Latest News
            - Agency Task Forces
            - Non-Docketed Public Correspondence
            - Meetings & Hearings
            - Transcripts & Statements
            - Testimony & Speeches 
          - About STB              - Board Members
            - Offices
            - Agency Materials                - Budget Requests
              - Strategic Plan and Performance & Accountability Reports
              - Small Business Compliance
              - STB Reauthorization Act Reports
              - Annual Reports (1996 – 2017)
              - Annual Employee Surveys 
            - Administrative Issuances
            - Open Government
            - Jobs 
          - Search for:

Home » Proceedings & Actions » Decisions

## Decisions

The following is a list of Board decisions issued each day.  Individuals seeking to conduct more detailed searches can do so by clicking the button below.

Search STB Records

 

Surface Transportation Board

## 395 E Street SW

Washington, DC 20423 (202) 245-0245 | TTY (800) 877-8339

## Email Us

## Policies

          - Privacy
          - Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          - Freedom of Information Act
          - No FEAR Act
          - Whistleblower Protection
          - Accessibility

## Help
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7839

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

BLAIR R. JONES, JR., 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, 

District Judge. (1:07-cv-00115-IMK-JSK; 1:05-cr-00095-IMK-1) 

Submitted: January 21, 2010 Decided: February 16, 2010 

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Blair R. Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Blair R. Jones, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will 

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). 

The district court concluded that Jones’ claims 

challenging the validity of his conviction were barred by the 

appellate waiver provision in his plea agreement. However, the 

waiver applies only to claims challenging Jones’ sentence. 

Nevertheless, although the district court committed a procedural 

error by relying on the waiver provision to dismiss Jones’ 

§ 2255 motion, our independent review of the record confirms 

that, on their merits, the claims Jones raised in his motion do 

2 
3 

not substantially show that his constitutional rights were 

infringed. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for a certificate 

of appealability and all pending motions and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
§ 16.241 Initial decisions, order, and appeals. ( a ) The hearing officer shall issue an initial decision based on the record developed during the proceeding and shall send the initial decision to the parties not later than 110 days after the Director's Determination unless otherwise provided in the hearing order.
( b ) Each party adversely affected by the hearing officer's initial decision may file an appeal with the Associate Administrator within 15 days of the date the initial decision is issued. Each party may file a reply to an appeal within 10 days after it is served on the party. Filing and service of appeals and replies shall be by personal delivery.
( c ) If an appeal is filed, the Associate Administrator reviews the entire record and issues a final agency decision and order within 60 days of the due date of the reply. If no appeal is filed, the Associate Administrator may take review of the case on his or her own motion. If the Associate Administrator finds that the respondent is not in compliance with any Act or any regulation, agreement, or document of conveyance issued or made under such Act, the final agency order includes, in accordance with § 16.245(d), a statement of corrective action, if appropriate, and identifies sanctions for continued noncompliance.
( d ) If no appeal is filed, and the Associate Administrator does not take review of the initial decision on the Associate Administrator's own motion, the initial decision shall take effect as the final agency decision and order on the sixteenth day after the actual date the initial decision is issued.
( e ) The failure to file an appeal is deemed a waiver of any rights to seek judicial review of an initial decision that becomes a final agency decision by operation of paragraph (d) of this section.
[Doc. No. 27783, 61 FR 54004, Oct. 16, 1996, as amended at Amdt. 16-1, 78 FR 56147, Sept. 12, 2013]
ADDENDUM TO 10% SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE





This ADDENDUM (the “Addendum”), to the 10% SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE dated December 8, 2010 (the “Convertible Debenture”) by and among Genmed Holding Corp., a Nevada corporation (“GenMed”) and R.P. Piceni (“RPP”), is hereby entered into by the Parties this 8th day of April, 2011, with the terms of this Addendum effective as of December 8, 2010.





WHEREAS, the Company currently is funding its operational and medical registration activities through the issuances of interest bearing Bonds and that RPP is aware of this funding process.





WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Convertible Debenture, by written agreement, consistent with the requirements and intentions of the Convertible Debenture;





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:





Article 1 – Amendments to the Convertible Debenture





Amendments to the Convertible Debenture





A.
By written agreement, the Parties hereby agree that the Convertible Debenture will be subordinated to all Bond Holders of the Company.


B.
By written agreement, the Parties also hereby amend the maturity date of the Convertible Debenture such that, because of the subordination to the current Bond Holders of the Company as described under A of this article, the Convertible Debenture currently will not have a fixed maturity date. The maturity date of the Convertible Debenture will be set at the first day after the expiration date of the last bond agreement between the Company and the holder of this bond.








Article 2 – No Other Amendments to the Convertible Debenture





Section 2.1
No other amendments to the Convertible Debenture are made herein except for those described and enumerated in Article 1 of this Addendum.  All terms in the Convertible Debenture not herein amended shall remain in effect pursuant to the terms of the Convertible Debenture.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, as shown by their signatures below, each of the Parties have caused this Addendum to the Convertible Debenture to be executed this 8th day of April, 2011, and to be effective as of December 8, 2010.








Genmed Holding Corp.                                                                                     R.P. Piceni








By:_____________________                                                                                                By: ________________________


Erwin R. Bouwens
Topic: Trailer Test Procedure- Pressurized 

Portable Marine Fuel Tanks

Date: 24 August 2009N Mik T d Name: Mike Torgerud
Rough Road Trailering Overflow Test

Test set-up/ procedure1-Install outboard on boat of rated horsepower.2 Install collection device (engine specific) at outlet of outboard carburetor vent or throttle body

Purpose- Determine effects of Dynamic boats with inlet pressure on outboard eng

2-Install collection device (engine specific) at outlet of outboard carburetor vent or throttle body, 

(insure collection device remains vented to atmosphere)- note this may require removal of air box 

3-Tilt engine to full trailer position and steer to port side or starboard side.4-Install pressure gage in fuel hose at outlet of tank (before primer bulb)5-Fill fuel tank to desired level (8 to 15rvp) and close tank- applying pressure to vapor space example m

Vapor pressure may be utilized by closing the tank in Vapor pressure may be utilized by closing the tank in a cool environment and allowing the tank to 

a cool environment and allowing the tank to 

-or- Compressed Nitrogen may be used to pressurizing the vapor space within tank.

6-If pressure exceeds target, fluid may be relieved through opening of fuel tank vent.7-Connect boat, trailer to tow vehicle and tow through rough road course for 15 minutes,8-Inspect engine/boat and tank,

9-Measure, document collected fuel.

10-Given "rough road" is a relative description,

if no fuel overflow- return to rough road course for 30 minutes.-Inspect engine/boat and tank,

-Measure document collected fuel Measure, document collected fuelif no fuel overflow- return to rough road course for 60 minutes.-Inspect engine/boat and tank,-Measure, document collected fuel
Rough Road 

Test Images 

(for reference)
Rough Road Results (for reference)

Transom Vertical Motion Time History, 25 MPH, RR X
Rough Road Conclusions (for reference)

1. 100 mm of transom dis

placement

Portable 

Fuel Tank Fuel Tank

2. Visible Leakage from Carburetor at 

7kPa (1psi)

Note- collection device capacity insufficient -overflow resulted
Rough Road Conclusions (for reference)

Engine Family 7kPa

VERTICAL

35kPa

VERTICAL

35kPa 

FULL TILT

Needle 

“Pop-off” 

FULL TILT

7kPa

FULL TILT & 

TRAILER

FU

Static D

8,9 HP 4cycle 

Carburetor

PASS PASS PASS Leak >103kPa FAIL 

4,5,6 HP 4cycle 

Carburetor

PASS PASS PASS Leak > 76kPa FAIL 

2 5 3 5 HP PASS PASS PASS Leak >69kPa FAIL 

Current Product

2.5, 3.5 HP

4 cycle Carburetor

PASS PASS PASS Leak >69kPa FAIL 

30-40 2 Cylinder 

2 Cycle Carburetor

PASS PASS PASS FAIL >83kPa ? 

4

0 H

p PASS PASS PASS FAIL >83kPa ? 

Legacy Product 0 p

4 Cycle Carburetor

6-15 HP 2 Cycle 

Carburetor

PASS PASS FAIL FAIL >35kPa FAIL 

25 Hp 

2 Cycle Carburetor

PASS PASS PASS FAIL >138kPa FAIL 

Co

mpetitiv

e

2 Cycle Carburetor

15 Hp 4Cycle 

carburetor

PASS PASS FAIL FAIL >35kPa FAIL 

2.5 Hp Carburetor PASS PASS FAIL FAIL >27kPa FAIL 

40Hp PASS PASS PASS FAIL >140kPa FAIL 

Co pet t e

40Hp

2005MY 4 Cycle 

Carburetor

PASS PASS PASS FAIL 140kPa FAIL
AFS-12-535-E

October 11, 2012

 Exemption No. 5533J

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2000-7980

Mr. Paul W. Railsback

Director of Operations

Air Transport Association of America d.b.a. Airlines for America

1302 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 1100

Washington, DC 20004

Dear Mr. Railsback:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 5533, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated September 4, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Air Transport Association of America d.b.a. Airlines for America (A4A) for an 

extension of Exemption No. 5533, as amended. That exemption from § 121.311(b) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows ATA member airlines and other 

similarly situated part 121 operators to permit qualified flight attendants not required by 

§ 121.391(c) to perform duties related to the safety of the airplane and its occupants during 

aircraft movement on the surface.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to A4A.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 5533, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, 

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 5533, as amended, to 

October 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Deputy Director, Flight Standards

 Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          53,553
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,080
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    177,689
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,694
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            13,980
<LOANS>                                        960,850
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,264,103
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,064,483
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,801
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,543
<LONG-TERM>                                     59,704
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,264,103
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 73,300
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,504
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,363
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                87,167
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              38,850
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,498
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           43,669
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,402
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   7
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 27,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,800
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      21,800
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.91
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,425
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,642
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,413
<RECOVERIES>                                       375
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,006
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,006
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>