alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Uradni list C 68A/2011

| | ISSN 1725-5244
  doi:10.3000/17255244.CA2011.068.slv |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 68A |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 543. marec 2011 |

ISSN 1725-5244

doi:10.3000/17255244.CA2011.068.slv

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 68A

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 543. marec 2011

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Popravki |
| 2011/C 068A/01 | Popravek razpisa javnega natečaja EPSO/AST/112/10 – Strokovno-tehnični uslužbenci (AST 3) (UL C 341 A, 16.12.2010) | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

Popravki

2011/C 068A/01

Popravek razpisa javnega natečaja EPSO/AST/112/10 – Strokovno-tehnični uslužbenci (AST 3) (UL C 341 A, 16.12.2010)

(UL C 341 A, 16.12.2010)

1

PREGLED NATEČAJEV UL C A

Spodaj je naveden seznam UL C A, objavljenih v tekočem letu.

Če ni drugače navedeno, so bili UL objavljeni v vseh jezikovnih različicah.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

Popravki

| 3.3.2011 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CA 68/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2011

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CA 68/1

---

Popravek razpisa javnega natečaja EPSO/AST/112/10 – Strokovno-tehnični uslužbenci (AST 3)

(
  Uradni list Evropske unije C 341 A z dne 16. decembra 2010
  )

(2011/C 68 A/01)

Stran 3, oddelek IV.2:

besedilo:

| „Test (d) | strokovne usposobljenosti:


  natančnost in jasnost | ocenjevanje: 0 do 20 točk


  najmanjše število točk za zadovoljivo oceno: 10 točk |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Test (e) | strokovne usposobljenosti:


  razporeditev in organizacija dela | ocenjevanje: 0 do 20 točk


  najmanjše število točk za zadovoljivo oceno: 10 točk“ |

„Test (d)

strokovne usposobljenosti:

natančnost in jasnost

ocenjevanje: 0 do 20 točk

najmanjše število točk za zadovoljivo oceno: 10 točk

Test (e)

strokovne usposobljenosti:

razporeditev in organizacija dela

ocenjevanje: 0 do 20 točk

najmanjše število točk za zadovoljivo oceno: 10 točk“

se glasi:

| „Test (d) | strokovne usposobljenosti:


  natančnost in jasnost | ocenjevanje: 0 do 20 točk |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Test (e) | strokovne usposobljenosti:


  razporeditev in organizacija dela | ocenjevanje: 0 do 20 točk |
| | najmanjše število točk za zadovoljivo oceno pri testih (d) in (e) skupaj: 20 točk“ |

„Test (d)

strokovne usposobljenosti:

natančnost in jasnost

ocenjevanje: 0 do 20 točk

Test (e)

strokovne usposobljenosti:

razporeditev in organizacija dela

ocenjevanje: 0 do 20 točk

najmanjše število točk za zadovoljivo oceno pri testih (d) in (e) skupaj: 20 točk“

---
#### STANDARD OIL CO. (INDIANA) v. UNITED STATES

[78 C.Cls. 714; 293 U.S. 599]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court October 15, 1934.
# L_2013241EN.01S00301.xml

| 10.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Satellite Enterprises
Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Leo P.F. van de Voort, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   April 15, 2004

                                        /s/ Leo P.F. van de Voort
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Leo P.F. van de Voort
                                        Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3926

___________

Barker Sanitation, an Iowa *

Corporation, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

City of Nebraska City, Nebraska, * District Court for the District

* of Nebraska.

Defendant-Appellee, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

v. *

*

Waste Connections of Nebraska, Inc., *

*

Intervenor Defendant- *

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 17, 2004

Filed: June 25, 2004

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Following an open request for proposals in which three out-of-state solid waste

disposal entities submitted bids, the City of Nebraska City adopted an ordinance

granting Waste Connections of Nebraska, Inc. an exclusive franchise to collect the
*

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska. 

-2-

solid waste within the City’s limits. In conjunction with the ordinance, the City

entered into a franchise agreement with Waste Connections. Later, Barker Sanitation,

an Iowa corporation engaged in the business of refuse collection services, began

serving waste collection customers in the City in violation of the ordinance. The City

issued a cease and desist letter to Barker Sanitation, and Barker Sanitation appealed

to the City Council, which decided to enforce the ordinance. In response, Barker

Sanitation brought this civil rights action against the City asserting its adoption of the

ordinance granting the exclusive franchise to Waste Connections violated the

dormant Commerce Clause. Following a bench trial, the district court*

 held the City

ordinance did not violate the dormant Commerce Clause. 

To prevail on its dormant Commerce Clause claim, Barker Sanitation had the

burden to show that the ordinance discriminates against interstate commerce on its

face or in its purpose or effects, or that the burden the ordinance imposes on interstate

commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the asserted local benefits. South Dakota

Farm Bureau, Inc. v. Hazeltine, 340 F.3d 583, 593 (8th Cir. 2003). The district court

held the ordinance did not discriminate against out-of-state interests on its face, in

effect, or in its purpose, and the numerous local benefits achieved were not

outweighed by the incidental burdens on interstate commerce. 

On appeal, Barker Sanitation contends the ordinance discriminates against

interstate commerce through its purpose of economic protectionism and through its

effect of preventing out-of-state companies from being able to compete for the

processing of solid waste in the City. Barker Sanitation also asserts the district court

erroneously found the ordinance had numerous local benefits that only incidentally

burdened interstate commerce. Having carefully reviewed Barker Sanitation’s

arguments, the record, and the applicable law, we conclude the district court properly
-3-

analyzed the case. Because we have nothing to add to the district court’s analysis, we

affirm without extended discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
     I,Gabriela Gonzalez, as Co-Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SpectraSite,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
       (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
       (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
July 28, 2004   /s/ GABRIELA GONZALEZ
SERVED: DECEMBER 20, 2011 

rMiiNT OF TRANSPORTATION \3.^i^'\9lME_NL0F 

FnCE OF HEARFNGS . x'^i^^TOaMQN 

U.S. DEPART 

WASHrNGTON, DC . •-•...'€!([:! OPERATiGi--lS 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FLEET AVIATION, LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Aclion) 

201! OEC 20 P 2- 5 3 

FDMSNO. FAA-20: 17 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2010EAI10021) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge .I.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. G^e 

Lonnic A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMSNO. FAA-2011-1117 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000' 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winlon, Respondenl's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville.MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Zachery M. \^c\Ta^n, Contploimw^s Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AEA-7 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service vvns by U.S. Mail. For service in persuii or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Adininislralion, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W.. Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington. 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--t30.
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.83 Tariff must be amended to make suspended matter effective. ( a ) When the Department vacates an order which suspended certain tariff matter in full or in part, such matter will not become effective until the termination of the suspension period unless the issuing agent or carrier amends the pertinent tariffs in the manner prescribed in this subpart (except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section).
( b ) If the Department vacates its suspension order prior to the original published effective date of the tariff provisions whose suspension is vacated, such provisions will become effective on their published effective date.
EXHIBIT 15A 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-15 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2017-76 (15A Spanish 15B English) Page 1 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-15 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2017-76 (15A Spanish 15B English) Page 2 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-15 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2017-76 (15A Spanish 15B English) Page 3 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-15 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2017-76 (15A Spanish 15B English) Page 4 of 8
EXHIBIT 15B 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-15 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2017-76 (15A Spanish 15B English) Page 5 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-15 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2017-76 (15A Spanish 15B English) Page 6 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-15 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2017-76 (15A Spanish 15B English) Page 7 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3126-15 Filed:05/23/18 Entered:05/23/18 11:45:37 Desc:

Exhibit Executive Bulletin OE-2017-76 (15A Spanish 15B English) Page 8 of 8
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4(a)

                           CERTIFICATE OF ELIMINATION

                                       OF

                       SERIES D CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK

                                       OF

                            OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC.

                           (Pursuant to section 151(g)
                         of the General Corporation Law
                            of the State of Delaware)

                  Oxford Health Plans, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), hereby certifies that the following resolution was duly adopted
by the Board of Directors of the Corporation as required by Section 151(g) of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware:

         RESOLVED, that pursuant to the authority granted to and vested in the
Board of Directors in accordance with the provisions of the Certificate of
Incorporation, the Board of Directors hereby states and declares that none of
the 247,319 authorized shares of the Series D Cumulative Preferred Stock are
outstanding, and none will be issued subject to the Certificate of Designations
filed with respect to such series on February 12, 1999; and when such
certificate setting forth this resolution becomes effective, it shall have the
effect of eliminating from the Certificate of Incorporation all matters set
forth in the Certificate of Designations with respect to the Series D Cumulative
Preferred Stock and such Certificate of Designations itself;

<PAGE>

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate of Elimination has been
executed on behalf of the Corporation by its Secretary and attested by its Vice
President. this 15th day of March, 2001.

                                                 OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC.

                                                 By:/s/ DANIEL N. GREGOIRE
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Daniel N. Gregoire
                                                    Executive Vice President,
                                                    Secretary and General
                                                    Counsel

Attest:

/s/ KURT THOMPSON
-----------------
Name:Kurt B. Thompson
Title: Executive Vice President
 And Chief Financial Officer
### Te s t P rocedures fo r D is tribution Transformers SNOPR Public Meeting 

## Un i 

## form Test Method for Mea s 

## uring Energy Consumption Building Technol og ies P rog ram Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

U.S. Department of Energy S e pte m ber 27, 2004

## ueneral Characteristics 17 Content: based on IEEE standards C57 .1 2.90 , , C57.12.01 and NEMA s ta nd ard O r g a n i z ati on the document: similar to that of NE MA stand a rd 

### I n s om e ite m s mo re d etail is a dd e d and la nguag e mod ifi ed because th e DOE test p rocedure is m a nd atory, not a voluntary guideline

2

## Key Elements of the Test Method

Test syst e m ac c u racy requ ire ments Res i st a nce m ea su re m e nts Loss measurements D etermi n ati o n of efficiency Te st equ i pm ent cali b rati on an d ce rt i fi cati on

3

## Key Element: Test System Accuracy

Test syste m accuracy requ ire m e nts: i n s tand a rd s Table 2.1 - Test System Accuracy Requirements for Each Measured Quantity

Measured Quantity Test System Accuracy Power Losses ±3.% Voltage ± 0.5% Current ± 0.5% Resistance ± 0.5% Temperature ± 1. 1.0°C 4

## Key Element : 

## Resistance Measurement

Te mp erat u re d et ermination windings: abbreviated standards M DC re sista n ce m eas u reme n ts: more det ail added on instrumentat i on C onversi o n m easure d resista nce: tha t refe rence 

### tempe rature Resistance m easurement : required only for one unit of a basic

5

## Key Element: Loss Measurements

Test sets: single- three-ph a se , w i th a nd w i thout transformers r-,

LI No -l o a d loss m easure m e n t (i n watts ): co rre ct i on s fo r i n str um entati o n losses, n on-sinu soidal applied v I tage, temperature, if outside the (20 ± 10 )O C range Load loss meas u rement (in watts): corrections for instrumentation losses , for phase angle error of instru m entation ; adjustment of results to reference temperature

6

## KUYElement : 

## Determination of Efficiency

° Adju l o a d loss fo r re du c ed outpu t load i ng

® 35% load for dry-type low-voltage units

® 50% load for liquid-immersed and dry-type medium-voltage units C alc u lation total losses C alc u lation o f e n ergy efficiency

7

## Key Element: Test Equipment Calibration and

Det aile d d escri pt i on all st ep s i nvolved i n ma i ntenance c a li b rat i o n, a nd re co rd ke ep in g of test equ i pmen t

8

## Other Issues ?

. IM An opportun i ty fo r st akeholde rs d i scuss othe r issues related 

### th e test m ethod for a distribution tr r®

9
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Engineering Education and Centers (#173).                     

*Date and Time:*                         June 1-2, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5:30p.m. (Originally was announced for May 31-June 2).                     

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, Rooms 360, 380, and 680. 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                     

*Contact Persons:*                         Dr. Cheryl Cathey, Program Director; Engineering Education and Centers Division; National Science Foundation, Room 585; 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the Nanoscale Modeling and Simulation Program (Small Group Initiative) as part of the selection process for awards.                     

*Reasons for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information: financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b. (c)(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 2, 2000. 

Karen J. York, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-11274  Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
§ 25.531 Hull and main float takeoff condition. For the wing and its attachment to the hull or main float— ( a ) The aerodynamic wing lift is assumed to be zero; and
( b ) A downward inertia load, corresponding to a load factor computed from the following formula, must be applied:
where— *n* = inertia load factor; *C* *TO* = empirical seaplane operations factor equal to 0.004; *V* *S* 1 = seaplane stalling speed (knots) at the design takeoff weight with the flaps extended in the appropriate takeoff position; β = angle of dead rise at the main step (degrees); and *W* = design water takeoff weight in pounds.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5673, Apr. 8, 1970]