alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 1

Parties and Actions Granted Modification of the Title III Stay 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2988-1 Filed:05/01/18 Entered:05/01/18 14:58:19 Desc:

Exhibit Parties and Actions Granted Modification of the Title III Stay Page 1 of 2
TITLE III STAY MODIFICATIONS AGREED TO BY THE DEBTORS 

FROM FEBRUARY 21, 2018 THROUGH APRIL 20, 2018 

Case Information Movant(s) Debtor Brief Description of the Modification Stipulation Date 

1. Caraballo-Rivera, et 

al. v. García Padilla, et al., Case No. 14-1431 United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico Discrimination action 

Héctor M. VázquezGarcía, Doroteo Sánchez-Cruz, Daniel Valentín García, Carlos J. PachecoEstrada, Luis A. Pérez-Bernard, and Roberto VélezGarcia 

Commonwealth The Title III Stay is hereby modified solely to 

the limited extent necessary to allow the Prepetition Action to proceed to judgment before the District Court; provided, however, the Title III Stay shall continue to apply in all other respects to the Prepetition Action including, but not limited to, the execution and enforcement of any judgment and for any claims for money damages and provisional remedies against the Commonwealth or any other Title III Debtor.

April 19, 2018 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2988-1 Filed:05/01/18 Entered:05/01/18 14:58:19 Desc:

Exhibit Parties and Actions Granted Modification of the Title III Stay Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 99 (a)


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. T. Battenberg III,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




April 16, 2003                                   /s/  J. T. Battenberg III
--------------                                   -----------------------------

                                                 J. T. Battenberg III
                                                 Chairman of the Board,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 President
EXHIBIT INDEX

            Following  is the  list of  Exhibits,  as  required  by Item  601 of
Regulation  S-K,  filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K,  including
Exhibits incorporated herein by reference (1):

  Exhibit No.
(Regulation S-K
   Item 601
  Designation)              Exhibits
---------------             --------

(3)         Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws:

            (i)        1--    Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
                              the Registrant under Section 807 of the
                              Business Corporation Law, filed
                              November 12, 1998.  ((1); Exhibit (3)(i))

            (ii)       1--    Bylaws in effect on the date of this
                              Report.  ((1); Exhibit (3)(ii))

(4)         Instruments  defining  the  rights of  security  holders,  including
            indentures (see also Exhibit (3) above):

                  Credit  Agreement,  dated December 4, 1998, among  Registrant,
                  certain  lenders and the First  National  Bank of Chicago,  as
                  agent.

(23) --     Consent of Experts:

            The consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

(27) --     Financial Data Schedule

The following are notes to the Exhibits listed above:

            (1)        Incorporated   herein  by   reference   to   Registrant's
                       Quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for fiscal  quarter  ended
                       September 30, 1998 (File No. 333-52797).

--------------------

            (1) Exhibits  which are  incorporated  by reference to other filings
are followed by  information  contained in  parentheses,  as follows:  The first
reference in the parenthesis is a numeral,  corresponding to a numeral set forth
in the Notes which follow this Exhibit list,  which  identifies the prior filing
in which the Exhibit  was  physically  filed;  and the second  reference  in the
parenthesis  is to the  specific  document  in that  prior  filing  in which the
Exhibit appears.

                                     E-1


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT I 

Order Granting Motion of Neal Batson, the Enron Examiner, with respect 

to Certain Procedural Issues in Connection with the Termination of the 

Enron Corp. Examination, In re Enron Corp., Case No. 01-16034 (AJG) 

(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2003) 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3427-9 Filed:07/03/18 Entered:07/03/18 19:29:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 4
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ICATECH CORPORATION and

EMPRESAS ICA, S.A.B. DE

. C.V.,

Defendants and Counterclaim

Plaintiffs Below,

Appellants,

v.

PAUL V. FACCHINA, SR., individually

and as Sellers’ Representative,

Plaintiff and Counterclaim

Defendant Below,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No

. 121, 2021

Court Below

– Superior Court

of the State of Delaware

C.A. No. N17C

- 09

- 163

Submitted: December 23, 2021

Decided: January 4 , 202 2

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA, VAUGHN, TRAYNOR and

MONTGOMERY

- REEVES , Justices

.

ORDER

This 4 th day of January

, 202 2 , having considered the appellant’s motion for rehearing

en B anc of the December 9, 2021 Order affirming the judgment of the Superior Court , the

Court concludes that the motion for rehearing en B anc is without merit and should be denied.2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for rehearing en B anc is

DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery

- Reeves

Justice
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00360

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF J.W., A C HILD §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 442nd District Court

of Denton County ( 20

- 6433

- 44 2 )

October 13, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DI STRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the provisions of 49 Sections U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-7161.                 

*Date Filed:*                     March 29, 2000.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                           ( print page 25973)    

*Subject:*                     PTC3 0424 dated 28 March 2000; Mail Vote 073—Resolution 063dd; TC3 Restricted Economy Class Fares from Japan to Korea.                 

Intended effective date: April 15, 2000. 

Andrea M. Jenkins, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 00-11160 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
#### § 158.41 General.

This subpart contains the requirements for notification, collection, handling and remittance of PFC's.
WILLIAMS MULLEN 

Direct Dial: 703.760.5204 

kpomfret@williamsmullen.com 

August 26, 2015 

BY FEDEX 

UAS Integration Office 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket FAA 2015-0732, Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 11713 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Property Drone Consortium ("PDC") received FAA Exemption No. 11713 on May 29, 

2015 (the "Exemption") authorizing it under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform 

Act of 2012 to operate two unmanned aircraft systems ("UAS"): the microdrones md4-1 000 and 

the Aerialtronics Altura Zenith ATx8, for aerial data collection. By this letter we request to 

amend the Exemption as follows: 

1. To add the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+; the PrecisionHawk Lancaster HawkEye Mk111; the DJI Phantom 3; the DJIInspire 1; and, the senseFiy eXom to the list of 

UAS PDC is permitted to operate under the exemption; and 

2. To clarify that the Exemption granted for aerial data collection includes research 

and testing associated with inspection of infrastructure, fixed assets and 

equipment. 

PDC will comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed in the Exemption 

except that Condition/Limitation number 1 will need to be revised to include the (i) DJI Phantom 

2 Vision+; (ii) PrecisionHawk Lancaster HawkEye Mk-111; (iii) the DJI Phantom 3; (iv) the DJI 

Inspire 1; and (v) senseFiy eXom. 

The list of "operating documents" will also need to be revised to include the operating 

documents for the five additional platforms. We have included copies of the operating 

documents under a separate cover letter. We request that these attachments be treated as 

confidential. 

Other than these revisions, there will be no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public safety that were the basis for the initial grant of exemption. Since our request 

will not set a precedent, and our proposed use will improve safety for workers and reduce time 

and associated costs for a variety of industries that are important to our nation's economy, we 

ask that this request be considered on an expedited basis. 

28757145 1 

8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 1100 Tysons Corner, VA 22102 T 703.760.5200 F 703.748.0244 

williamsmullen.com I A Professional Corporation 
WILLIAMS MULLEN 

UAS Integration Office 

Federal Aviation Administration 

August 26, 2015 

Page 2 

Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please contact me at 703.760.5204 or 

at kpomfret@williamsmullen.com if you have any questions. 

Sincere! , 

./J .· I . t/V ev1~ ~omfret 

KDP/kmb 

Confidential Attachments Under Separate Cover 

28757145_1
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3108-1 Filed:05/21/18 Entered:05/21/18 18:33:20 Desc:

Exhibit Movants Exhibit I Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3108-1 Filed:05/21/18 Entered:05/21/18 18:33:20 Desc:

Exhibit Movants Exhibit I Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
Ralph C. Guild, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Ralph C. Guild                               
|                      |  | Ralph C. Guild                                   
|                      |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, William J. McEntee, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                  
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date:    August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ William J. McEntee, Jr.                      
|                         |  | William J. McEntee, Jr.                          
|                         |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### Agenda for Conference Call Christopher Lambesis, Todd Ramaly, Terri Zick to: woodgl@trimatrixlabs.com ,

glaserj@trimatrixlabs.com Cc: Kathy Wilson 07/08/2010 11:18 AM

From: Terri Zick <tzick@cticompanies.com > To: Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Todd Ramaly/R5/USEPA/US@EPA,

"woodgl@trimatrixlabs.com " <woodgl@trimatrixlabs.com >, "glaserj@trimatrixlabs.com " <glaserj@trimatrixlabs.com > Cc: Kathy Wilson <kathywilson@owossographic.com >

The following areas of discussion are expected during the upcoming conference call at 3pm eastern / 2pm Central today (7/8/10).

1. Discussion of the intent and purpose of NMP analysis (waste samples and raw product), 2. Discussion of bench notes associated with preparation of the raw product NMP sample, 3. Amendments to lab narrative that reflect failure of numerous unrelated QA/QC parameters (in particular, phenols). 4. Discussion of 4% recovery of NMP in the raw sample and relationship to control limits, 5. Discussion of dilution used for the raw sample as presented in the raw data, 6. Calculations used to generate the concentrations of detectable NMP 7. Any other remaining outstanding issues affecting the delisting

Please let me know if I have misrepresented the issues/concerns in the above list of discussion points. We all seek to resolve these issues today, so please advise me right away if there are additional points to be covered at the meeting.

Thank you



### Terri Zick 313-300-7401 cell tzick@cticompanies.com

CTI and Associates, Inc. 

### 51331 W. Pontiac Trail, Wixom, Ml 48393 248.486.5100 Phone / 248.486.5050 Fax

The information contained in this electronic message is privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is neither allowed nor intended. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail or bycalling 800-CTI-TODAY and delete the message. Thank You!
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.501 Applicability.

This subpart sets forth the special rules applicable to proceedings with respect to rates, fares and charges in foreign air transportation under Chapter 415 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII. Except as modified by this subpart, the provisions of subpart A apply.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADDED
      BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific CMA, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Mazarella, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as
      added by ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(b)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of and for the period covered by the
                Report.






By: 
        /s/ John Mazarella___________________
 John
        Mazarella, Chief Financial Officer
 Date:  August
        21, 2006
#### Parkhurst *v.*Dunlap.

In proceedings on attachment in nature of distress for rent in anear, when the defendant in attachment replevies the property, it is not necessary for the plaintiff in attachment to file a declaration.

IN ERROR from the circuit court of the county of Adams.

Sanders for plaintiff in error.

Turner, Justice.

This is a case of distress for rent, under our statute. The proceeding is in nature of an attachment. The landlord claiming rent makes affidavit of his claim, and gives bond in the nature of an attachment bond.

The tenant has the right to replevy the property attached or distrained, which, in this case, was done.

It seems that on the return of the attachment into the circuit court of Adams county, at June term, 1840, the defendant in the attachment moved the court to dismiss the cause for want of a declaration; that the court sustained the motion, and dismissed the suit, at the cost of the plaintiff, Parkhurst.

The statute on this subject, Rev. Code, 168 to 174, directs the mode of proceeding in attachments for rent, and directs that on the attached or distrained property being replevied, and the replevin being returned into court, the court shall cause an issue to be made up, on the writ of replevin, to be tried at the return term as a privileged suit.

The act does not require the landlord to file a declaration. If the property attached or distrained by the sheriff is not replevied, the sheriff is required to sell it on a short credit, without the judgment of the court. But if replevied, the cause goes into court, where the parties litigate the matter on issue joined.

*578The court erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss. An issue should have been ordered, and if the landlord or plaintiff in attachment would not join in the issue, he might have been non-suited by order of court.

The better course of practice under these statutes would be to assimilate this proceeding to other cases of attachment, after the property is replevied — for the plaintiff, on the return, to file his declaration and tender an issue. And such has been the practice in some of our circuit courts. Walker’s Rep. 170, 358.

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings.
§ 25.953 Fuel system independence. Each fuel system must meet the requirements of § 25.903(b) by— ( a ) Allowing the supply of fuel to each engine through a system independent of each part of the system supplying fuel to any other engine; or
( b ) Any other acceptable method.
Exhibit 23.2



| |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                     
| |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  |  |  | Deloitte & Touche LLP
1 Place Ville Marie Suite 3000
Montreal QC H3B 4T9 Canada
 Tel: 514-393-5451 Fax: 514-390-4113 www.deloitte.ca

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Nos. 333-112021, 333-13350, 333-66044, 333-74932, 333-146175, and 333-177013) on Form S-8 and to the use of our report dated
November 8, 2009 relating to the 2009 consolidated financial statements (before retrospective adjustments to the financial statements) of CGI Group Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
referring to not being engaged to audit the retrospective adjustments) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of CGI Group Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

Independent Registered Chartered Accountants

(Signed)

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Montreal, Canada

December 22, 2011
§ 29.1183 Lines, fittings, and components. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each line, fitting, and other component carrying flammable fluid in any area subject to engine fire conditions and each component which conveys or contains flammable fluid in a designated fire zone must be fire resistant, except that flammable fluid tanks and supports in a designated fire zone must be fireproof or be enclosed by a fireproof shield unless damage by fire to any non-fireproof part will not cause leakage or spillage of flammable fluid. Components must be shielded or located so as to safeguard against the ignition of leaking flammable fluid. An integral oil sump of less than 25-quart capacity on a reciprocating engine need not be fireproof nor be enclosed by a fireproof shield.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to— ( 1 ) Lines, fittings, and components which are already approved as part of a type certificated engine; and
( 2 ) Vent and drain lines, and their fittings, whose failure will not result in or add to, a fire hazard.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-2, 32 FR 6914, May 5, 1967; Amdt. 29-10, 39 FR 35463, Oct. 1, 1974; Amdt. 29-22, 49 FR 6850, Feb. 23, 1984]