alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Coal License Agreements

April 30, 1958.

John Sullivan, Deputy Attorney General, and Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General,

You ask whether the Game Commission may legally enter into a license agreement with a coal operator, who owns land adjacent to State game lands, for his use of some three acres of State game lands in order to gain access to and to mine the coal on his own property.

*783This use would involve a road right of way, construction of necessary buildings and installations for deep mine operations and removal of coal valued at something less than $500 from one acre of the State game lands. All buildings and installations are to be removed at the operator’s expense when the lease terminates.

Section 906(e) of The Game Law of June 3, 1937, P. L. 1225, as amended, 34 PS §1311.906, authorizes the Game Commission to grant “licenses for rights of way for roads”, and to charge “such remuneration and damages as the commission deems the conditions and circumstances warrant”.

Subsection (c) authorizes the Game Commission to sell or lease coal on game lands, with the Governor’s approval, no advertising being required if the value of the coal does not exceed $500.

This leaves as the only remaining question the commission’s authority to permit construction of buildings and installation of equipment. This is not among the grants of leasing authority specifically enumerated in section 906. However, section 906(c), since it authorizes sale of the coal under commission land, carries with it the right to erect such installations as are necessary to carry out the removal of said coal and, therefore, permits erection of a tipple, fan house and other indispensable temporary structures appurtenant to this operation: Commonwealth ex rel. Cartwright v. Cartwright, 350 Pa. 638, 644, 645 (1945). However, this section does not permit any construction on State game land for the purpose of removing coal from adjacent privately owned land.

The fact that this lease would provide substantial employment and that it would be highly profitable to the Game Commission without detriment to wildlife is a matter which may influence the Game Commission in its decision, but it is not pertinent to the legal ques*784tions involved. Under the statute the commission has authority to grant the license upon such terms as it considers appropriate, and, therefore, the question of a wheelage charge is a matter for commission discretion. Removal of the coal on the game land should be treated as a sale and handled accordingly.

You are accordingly advised that the' commission may grant a right of way for a road over State game lands to a private coal operator but may not allow said operator to construct buildings and install equipment thereon for the purpose of removing coal from adjacent private land. Further, the commission may allow the removal of less than $500 worth of coal from State game land with the Governor’s approval and without advertising.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2783-7 Filed:03/22/18 Entered:03/22/18 11:39:35 Desc:

Exhibit G Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2783-7 Filed:03/22/18 Entered:03/22/18 11:39:35 Desc:

Exhibit G Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2783-7 Filed:03/22/18 Entered:03/22/18 11:39:35 Desc:

Exhibit G Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2783-7 Filed:03/22/18 Entered:03/22/18 11:39:35 Desc:

Exhibit G Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2783-7 Filed:03/22/18 Entered:03/22/18 11:39:35 Desc:

Exhibit G Page 5 of 5
Exhibit99.1

 

SEACOASTFINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

 

OneCompass Place

NewBedford, MA 02740

 

LETTERTO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

 

March29, 2002

 

Security and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Thisletter is written pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article No. 3 of RegulationS-X.  Seacoast Financial ServicesCorporation has received a representation letter from Arthur Andersen LLP(“Andersen”) stating that the audit of the consolidated balance sheets ofSeacoast Financial Services Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December31, 2001, was subject to Andersen’s quality control system for the U.S.accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that theengagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that therewas appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit,availability of national office consultation, and availability of personnel atforeign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

 

 
|   | Very  truly yours,                       |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                                     |
|   | Seacoast  Financial Services Corporation |
|   |                                     |
|   | /s/  Francis S. Mascianica               |   |
|   |                                     |
|   | Francis  S. Mascianica Jr.               |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer                 |
|   |                                     |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ron Sarner, Acting Chief Financial Officer of Critical Home Care, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)      the Periodic Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
         ended September 30, 2002, to which this certification accompanies (the
         "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)      the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 19, 2002
                                                  /s/Ron Sarner
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Ron Sarner,
                                                  Acting Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.2

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULE**

IDG Books Worldwide, Inc.:
Foster City, California


We have audited the consolidated
financial statements of IDG Books Worldwide, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
September 30, 1999 and 1998, and for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 1999, and have issued our report thereon dated November 15, 1999
(December 9, 1999 as to paragraph 4 of Note 3); such consolidated financial
statements and report are included in your 1999 Annual Report to Stockholders
and are incorporated herein by reference. Our audits also included the
consolidated financial statement schedule of IDG Books Worldwide, Inc. and
subsidiaries listed in Item 14(a)(2). The financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPSan Jose, California
November 15, 1999 (December 9, 1999 as to paragraph 4 of Note 3)
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00208**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 00208\00208_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 00208\00208_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00208\00208_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00208\00208_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 00208\Certification Statement_00208.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 00208\Supporting Documentation\00208_Site Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00208\Supporting Documentation\Water Flow Schematic.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00208\00208_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00208\00208_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 25.681 Limit load static tests. ( a ) Compliance with the limit load requirements of this Part must be shown by tests in which— ( 1 ) The direction of the test loads produces the most severe loading in the control system; and
( 2 ) Each fitting, pulley, and bracket used in attaching the system to the main structure is included.
( b ) Compliance must be shown (by analyses or individual load tests) with the special factor requirements for control system joints subject to angular motion.
---

Exhibit
10.5





October
12, 2009





DIRECTV,
Inc.


2230 East
Imperial Highway


El
Segundo, CA 90245


Attention:  Toby
Berlin





Dear
Toby:





Reference
is made to that certain Amended And Restated Affiliation And License Agreement
For DTH Satellite Exhibition Of Programming between DirecTV, Inc. (“Affiliate”)
and Playboy Entertainment Group and Spice Hot Entertainment, Inc. (“Programmer”)
made as of August 1, 2007 (the “Agreement”).





Except as
modified expressly below, all terms of the Agreement are hereby ratified and
remain in full force and effect.  All capitalized terms used herein
shall have the meanings ascribed to them as set forth in the
Agreement.





Affiliate
and Programmer hereby agree to extend the Term of the Agreement as set forth in
Paragraph 6.(a) through the earlier of the parties entering into a replacement
agreement or November 14, 2009.





Very
truly yours,





PLAYBOY
      ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
            
            SPICE
      HOT ENTERTAINMENT, INC.By
            James J. Dietle
            
            By
            Catherine A. ZulferTitle
            Senior Vice President
            
            Title
            SR VP & Controller
  PEGIBusiness and Legal Affairs





ACCEPTED
AND AGREED:





DIRECTV,
Inc.





By:
            Toby BerlinTitle:
            Vice President, Programming,
      Acquisitions
Exhibit 10(a)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 13 to
Registration Statement No. 811-7885 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 of
Quantitative Master Series Trust on Form N-1A of our reports on each Fund and
each Series listed below, appearing in the December 31, 2002 Annual Reports of
the respective Funds, in Part B of this Registration Statement.

Name                                                          Date of our Report
----                                                          ------------------

Merrill Lynch S&P 500 Index Fund                              February 18, 2003
Master S&P 500 Index Series                                   February 18, 2003
Merrill Lynch Small Cap Index Fund                            February 20, 2003
Master Small Cap Index Series                                 February 20, 2003
Merrill Lynch Aggregate Bond Index Fund                       February 20, 2003
Master Aggregate Bond Index Series                            February 20, 2003
Merrill Lynch International Index Fund                        February 20, 2003
Master International Index Series                             February 20, 2003

We also consent to the use in this Registration Statement of our reports on each
Series listed below, appearing in Part B of this Registration Statement.

Name                                                          Date of our Report
----                                                          ------------------

Master Mid Cap Index Series                                   February 21, 2003
Master Extended Market Index Series                           February 14, 2003
Master Enhanced S&P 500 Series                                February 24, 2003
Master Enhanced Small Cap Series                              February 24, 2003
Master Enhanced International Series                          February 21, 2003

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Princeton, New Jersey
April  29, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3768 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3768

   To expand the Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve, Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2004

Mr. Crenshaw (for himself and Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To expand the Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve, Florida.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Timucuan Ecological and Historic 
Preserve Boundary Revision Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF BOUNDARY OF TIMUCUAN ECOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC 
              PRESERVE, FLORIDA.

    Section 201(a) of Public Law 100-249 (16 U.S.C. 698n) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) Establishment.--There is hereby'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(a) Establishment.--
            ``(1) In general.--There is''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Modification of boundary.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In addition to the land 
                described in paragraph (1), the Preserve shall include 
                approximately 12.5 acres of land located in Nassau 
                County, Florida, as generally depicted on the map 
                entitled `Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve 
                American Beach Adjustment', numbered 006/80012 and 
                dated June 2003.
                    ``(B) Duties of secretary.--The Secretary of the 
                Interior shall--
                            ``(i) revise the boundaries of the Preserve 
                        so as to encompass the land described in 
                        subparagraph (A); and
                            ``(ii) maintain the map described in 
                        subparagraph (A) on file and available for 
                        public inspection in the appropriate offices of 
                        the National Park Service.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### MAYNARD et al. v. PARMAN, County Supt., et al.

No. 31851.

Jan. 30, 1945.

*156 P. 2d 606.*

Ash & Bailey, of Cordell, for plaintiffs in error.

Thos. A. Edwards and Jesse Stovall, both of Cordell, for defendants in error.

ARNOLD, J.

On the 19th day of July, 1943, certain electors in Cloud Chief school district No. C-8 filed a purported petition for annexation of one and one-half sections of land embraced in that school district to district No. 107 of Washita county. On the 28th day of August, 1943, the county superintendent posted notices calling an election for the purpose of such annexation. On the 10th day of September, 1943, the county superintendent posted notices of the election results and made the annexation contemplated. Within ten days thereafter plaintiffs in error, comprising more than 25 per cent of the electors of Cloud Chief district C-8, appealed from the action of the county superintendent to the district court, and on the 30th day of December, 1943, on motion of Frank Parman, county superintendent of Washita county, the district court dismissed the appeal of plaintiffs in error, from which order of the district court this appeal is taken.

The motion to dismiss the appeal filed by the county superintendent was based on the ground that none of the appellants reside upon the particular section and one-half of land which the petitioners were seeking to annex. No motion to dismiss was filed and no appearance of any character was made by the petitioners who were seeking to have the territory annexed.

The territory annexed had never been a part of district No. 107.

Plaintiffs in error argue, among other assignments of error, that:

> “The court erred in dismissing the appeal of plaintiffs in error on the motion of the county superintendent.”

*106Section 5 of Senate Bill 5, 70 O.S. Supp. §§ 891.1 to 891.11, authorizes an appeal by the qualified electors who voted or were, eligible to vote at an election held on the question of annexation. Only such electors of the territory to be annexed may vote at such an election, and the act does not authorize an appeal from an order of annexation by other persons, though they be qualified electors of the district from which the territory would be detached. The appellants were not residents of the area to be annexed and were not qualified to vote at the election held and had no right of appeal. The appeal should have been dismissed, but we do not mean to say that the annexation was valid. See Board of Education of Burbank Independent School District No. 20, a Municipal Corporation of Osage County, Oklahoma, v. T. E. Allen, County Superintendent of Public Instruction of Osage County, Oklahoma, et al., 195 Okla. 209, 156 P. 2d 596.

Affirmed.
181005 ORD GRANTING MASTER LINK EXT.DOCX VERSION OCTOBER 5, 2018 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et 

al., 

Debtors.1

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as representative of 

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER 

AUTHORITY (PREPA), 

 Debtor. 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 4780-LTS 

This Order shall be filed in both the 

lead Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS 

and Case No. 17-BK-4780-LTS. 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER 

RELATED TO MASTER LINK CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR RELIEF OF STAY

 The Court has received and reviewed the Joint Motion in Compliance with Order 

Related to Master Link Corporation’s Motion for Relief of Stay (Docket Entry No. 4022 in Case 

No. 17-3283 and Docket Entry No. 983 in Case No. 17-4780, the “Motion”) filed by counsel to 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) 

Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 

BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) (Title III case numbers are listed 

as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4029 Filed:10/09/18 Entered:10/09/18 11:08:53 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
181005 ORD GRANTING MASTER LINK EXT.DOCX VERSION OCTOBER 5, 2018 2 

Master Link Corporation. The Motion is hereby granted. The parties shall file the joint status 

report no later than October 22, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). 

 This Order resolves Docket Entry No. 4022 in Case No. 17-3283 and Docket 

Entry No. 983 in Case No. 17-4780. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 5, 2018 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

 United States District Judge 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4029 Filed:10/09/18 Entered:10/09/18 11:08:53 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### Oren ROBERTSON *v.*STATE of Arkansas

5710

478 S.W. 2d 878

Opinion delivered April 17, 1972

*Gus R. Camp,*for appellant.

*Ray Thornton,*Atty. Gen., by *John D. Bridgeforth,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

This is an appeal under our criminal procedure rule one. Robertson was sentenced to five years in the penitentiary. Thereafter he filed a petition in the sentencing court to have the sentence set aside and requested that he be permitted to be present for a hearing on the petition. The trial court, acting under rule one (C), held that the records in the case showed conclusively that petitioner was entitled to no relief and did not order the presence of the petitioner. The single point urged on appeal is that the court erred in the failure to order appellant’s presence before the sentencing court.

*334In appellant’s petition to the trial court he alleged (a) that he was not advised of his constitutional rights by the arresting officer, (b) that he did not have effective assistance of counsel, and (c) that all proceedings subsequent to his arrest denied him due process of law. Under pleading (c) he said he was illegally held without bail, that he was not committed by a magistrate, and that he was tricked into entering a plea of nolo contendré when in fact he was not guilty.

Appellant is not entitled to be present when his petition for post-conviction relief can be processed under rule one (C). *Grayer*v. *State,*242 Ark. 640, 414 S.W. 2d 870 (1967). Under (C) the trial court examines the motion alongside the records and files in the case and if it is revealed conclusively that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, that ends the matter. In the case at bar the trial court followed that procedure and disposed of the petition under rule one (C).The trial court made extensive findings from the records available and reached these conclusions:

When the plea was entered, appellant was represented by competent, employed counsel; he was fully informed ot all the facts relating to the charges against him; he was informed that he was entitled to a jury trial, which he waived; appellant counseled with his employed attorney and was fully satisfied with all services rendered; appellant replied in the negative when he was asked if he had any questions he desired to ask of court or counsel; and appellant confirmed that “he had not been coerced by anyone and that the plea he desired to enter was a voluntary plea.”

According to the record we have summarized, this appellant was given every opportunity to speak out, either in person or by employed counsel, and to raise any possible defense he had to the charges. If he had any such defenses it was incumbent that he raise them. In the face of the record made by the trial court and here summarized, appellant is not entitled at this late date to collaterally attack his sentence. Since appellant *335was in no position to attack the judgment, his presence naturally was not needed.

Affirmed.

Fogleman, J., not participating.