alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
180924 SCH ORD RE ADMIN RENT MOT VERSION SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

----------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: PROMESA 

 Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered) 

et al., 

 Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x 

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF MOTION FOR 

APPLICATION REQUESTING ADMINISTRATIVE RENT PAYMENT

 The Court has received and reviewed the Motion for Application Requesting 

Administrative Rent Payment (the “Motion”) filed by Ponce Real Estate Corporation (the 

“Movant”). (Docket Entry No. 3958 in Case No. 17-3283.) Opposition papers to the Motion 

must be filed by October 8, 2018. Movants’ reply papers must be filed by October 15, 2018. 

The Court will thereafter take the Motion on submission. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 24, 2018 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

 United States District Judge 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) 

Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 

BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) (Title III case numbers are listed 

as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3963 Filed:09/24/18 Entered:09/24/18 08:23:46 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
ADDENDUM TO 10% SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE





This ADDENDUM (the “Addendum”), to the 10% SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE dated December 8, 2010 (the “Convertible Debenture”) by and among Genmed Holding Corp., a Nevada corporation (“GenMed”) and Admefo Investments AG (“Admefo”), is hereby entered into by the Parties this 8th day of April, 2011, with the terms of this Addendum effective as of December 8, 2010.





WHEREAS, the Company currently is funding its operational and medical registration activities through the issuances of interest bearing Bonds and that Admefo is aware of this funding process.





WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Convertible Debenture, by written agreement, consistent with the requirements and intentions of the Convertible Debenture;





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:





Article 1 – Amendments to the Convertible Debenture





Amendments to the Convertible Debenture





A.
By written agreement, the Parties hereby agree that the Convertible Debenture will be subordinated to all Bond Holders of the Company.


B.
By written agreement, the Parties also hereby amend the maturity date of the Convertible Debenture such that, because of the subordination to the current Bond Holders of the Company as described under A of this article, the Convertible Debenture currently will not have a fixed maturity date. The maturity date of the Convertible Debenture will be set at the first day after the expiration date of the last bond agreement between the Company and the holder of this bond.








Article 2 – No Other Amendments to the Convertible Debenture





Section 2.1
No other amendments to the Convertible Debenture are made herein except for those described and enumerated in Article 1 of this Addendum.  All terms in the Convertible Debenture not herein amended shall remain in effect pursuant to the terms of the Convertible Debenture.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, as shown by their signatures below, each of the Parties have caused this Addendum to the Convertible Debenture to be executed this 8th day of April, 2011, and to be effective as of December 8, 2010.








Genmed Holding Corp.                                                                                     Admefo Investments AG








By:_____________________                                                                                                By: ________________________


Erwin R. Bouwens                                                                                                                           E.B.H.G. Meijers
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 24, 2018

Order 

Clerk

August 24, 2018

154159(58)

TAMMY McNEILL-MARKS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 154159

v COA: 326606 

Gratiot CC: 14-011876-NZ

MIDMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER- GRATIOT,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 15, 2018 

order is considered, and it is DENIED.
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Promotion of sea transport and the recruitment and training of seafarers’

(2005/C 157/05)

On 29 January 2004, the European Economic and Social Committee decided to draw up an opinion, under Rule 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, on the ‘Promotion of sea transport and the recruitment and training of seafarers’.

The Section for Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 5 October 2004. The rapporteur was Mr Chagas.

At its 413th plenary session of 15 and 16 December 2004 (meeting of 15 December 2004), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 137 votes to 1 with 5 abstentions.

1.   Introduction

2.   Commission recommendations promoting the recruitment and training of seafarers, and sea transport (11)

3.   Council recommendations promoting the recruitment and training of seafarers, and sea transport

4.   European Parliament's opinions concerning promoting the recruitment and training of seafarers, and sea transport

5.   General comments and observations

6.   Maritime profession

7.   Maritime transport

8.   Recommendations

Brussels, 15 December 2004.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----

(1)  COM(96) 81 final, of 8.4.1997.

(2)OJ C 109, 8.4.1997, p.1

(3)  COM(2001) 188 final of 6.4.2001. EESC Opinion : OJ C 80, 3.4.2002, p. 9.

(4)  Source: Joint Study of the Federation of Transport Workers' Unions in the European Union (FST) and of the European Ship Owners' Association (ECSA): ‘Improving the Employment Opportunities for EU Seafarers: An Investigation to Identify Seafarers Training and Education Priorities’ (1998)

(5)  METHAR: Harmonization of European Maritime Education and Training Schemes

(6)  METNET: Thematic Network on Maritime Education, Training and Mobility of Seafarers

(7)  BIMCO (Baltic and International Maritime Council)/ISF (International Shipping Federation) 2000 Manpower Update – The World-wide Demand for and Supply of Seafarers – April 2000

(8)  See footnote 3

(9)  Source: Study entitled ‘The UK economy's requirements for people with experience of working at sea 2003’, commissioned by the Department for Transport, the Chamber of Shipping and the Marine Society in the UK undertaken by the University of Cardiff.

(10)  COM(2003) 155 final of 7.4.2003

(11)  See footnote 3

(12)  EESC Opinion OJ C 80 of 3.4.2002 p.9

(13)  EESC Opinion OJ C 32 of 5.2.2004, p. 67

(14)  Council 2515th meeting 5.6.2003, 9686/03 (Presse 146)

(15)  See footnote 3

(16)  White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ – European Commission 2001

(17)  Maritime Policy ‘European Union legislation and objectives for sea transport’ – European Commission 2002

(18)  EU Energy and Transport in Figures Statistical Pocketbook 2003 – European Commission

(19)  See footnote 16

(20)  European Sea Ports Organisation Annual Report 2003

(21)  Proposal for a joint ECSA/ETF Project on the mapping of career paths in the maritime industries 2004

----
§ 29.1091 Air induction. ( a ) The air induction system for each engine and auxiliary power unit must supply the air required by that engine and auxiliary power unit under the operating conditions for which certification is requested.
( b ) Each engine and auxiliary power unit air induction system must provide air for proper fuel metering and mixture distribution with the induction system valves in any position.
( c ) No air intake may open within the engine accessory section or within other areas of any powerplant compartment where emergence of backfire flame would constitute a fire hazard.
( d ) Each reciprocating engine must have an alternate air source.
( e ) Each alternate air intake must be located to prevent the entrance of rain, ice, or other foreign matter.
( f ) For turbine engine powered rotorcraft and rotorcraft incorporating auxiliary power units— ( 1 ) There must be means to prevent hazardous quantities of fuel leakage or overflow from drains, vents, or other components of flammable fluid systems from entering the engine or auxiliary power unit intake system; and
( 2 ) The air inlet ducts must be located or protected so as to minimize the ingestion of foreign matter during takeoff, landing, and taxiing.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424), sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 969, Jan. 26, 1968; Amdt. 29-17, 43 FR 50601, Oct. 30, 1978]
AFS

- 12

- 535

- E October 11, 2012

Exemption No. 5533J

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2000

- 7980

Mr. Paul W. Railsback

Director of Operations

Air Transport Association of America d.b.a. Airlines for A merica

1302 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 1100

Washington, DC 20004

Dear Mr. Railsback :

This letter is to inform you that we have g ranted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 5533 , as amended. It explains the basis for our decision

, and describes it s effect

.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated September 4, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

on behalf of Air Transport Association of America d.b.a. Airlines for America ( A4A ) for an

extension of Exemption No. 5533 , as amended. That exemption from § 121.311(b) of

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows ATA member airlines and other

similarly situated part 121 operators to permit qualified flight attendants not required by

§ 121.391(c) to perform duties re lated to the safety of the airplane and its occupants during

aircraft movement on the surface.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granti ng the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register bec ause the requested extension of the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petit ion would be detrimental to A4A

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 5533 , as

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore,

under the authority pro vided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegat ed to me, I grant your petition

.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 5533 , as amended, to

October 31, 2014, unless so oner superse ded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service
# Official Journal C 176/2 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 176 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 602 June 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 176

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 602 June 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 176/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 176/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
You’ll find these trail markers

at all trailheads and intersections. 

The metal bands are stamped 

with directional and mileage 

information.

Rose

R

vi er Fire Road

Leave No Trace Preservation through education: building awareness, appreciation, and most of all, respect for our public recreation places.

Hawksbill Summit from:

• Hawksbill Gap parking (mile 45.6) - 1.7 miles round trip, on Lower Hawksbill 

Trail. Fairly steep hike to spectacular view.

• Hawksbill Gap parking (mile 45.6) - 2.9-mile circuit on the Appalachian Trail, 

Salamander Trail, and Lower Hawksbill Trail. Moderately difficult hike with 

beautiful views much of the way, and a spectacular view at the top.

• Upper Hawksbill parking (mile 46.7) - 2.1 miles round trip, on Upper 

Hawksbill Trail and parts of Hawksbill Fire Road. Moderate hike to a 

gorgeous view.

Rose River Loop Trail - 4-mile circuit from Fishers Gap, 

moderate, shady trail with streams, cascades, and a waterfall.

Note: Round trip hikes proceed to a destination and 

return by the same route. Circuit hikes begin 

and end at the same point without 

retracing steps.

Hawksbill Mountain Area

Road and Trail Map

Park Information recording: (540) 999-3500 

www.nps.gov/shen

National Park Service Shenandoah National Park U.S. Department of the Interior

01/13

Park Emergency Number (800) 732-0911

You’ll find these trail markers

at all trailheads and intersections.

The metal bands are stamped

with directional and mileage 

information.

*

* Horses are allowed only on yellow-blazed fire roads and trails.
§ 1252.405 Compliance procedure. ( a ) NASA may enforce the Act and these regulations through: ( 1 ) Termination of a recipient's Federal financial assistance from NASA under the program or activity involved where the recipient has violated the Act or these regulations. The determination of the recipient's violation may be made only after a recipient has had an opportunity for a hearing on the record before an administrative law judge. Therefore, cases which are settled in mediation, or prior to a hearing, will not involve termination of a recipient's Federal financial assistance from NASA.
( 2 ) Any other means authorized by law including but not limited to: ( i ) Referral to the Department of Justice for proceedings to enforce any rights of the United States or obligations of the recipient created by the Act or these regulations.
( ii ) Use of any requirement of or referral to any Federal, State, or local government agency that will have the effect of correcting a violation of the Act or these regulations.
( b ) NASA will limit any termination under § 1252.405(a)(1) to the particular program or activity NASA finds in violations of these regulations. NASA will not base any part of a termination on a finding with respect to any program or activity of the recipient which does not receive Federal financial assistance from NASA.
( c ) NASA will take no action under paragraph (a) until: ( 1 ) The Administrator has advised the recipient of its failure to comply with the Act and these regulations and has determined that voluntary compliance cannot be obtained.
( 2 ) 30 days have elapsed after the Administrator has sent a written report of the circumstances and grounds of the action to the committees of Congress having legislative jurisdiction over the program or activity involved. The Administrator will file a report whenever any action is taken under paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) NASA also may defer granting new Federal financial assistance from NASA to a recipient when a hearing under § 1252.405(a)(1) is initiated. ( 1 ) New Federal financial assistance from NASA includes all assistance for which NASA requires an application or approval, including renewal or continuation of existing activities during the deferral period. New Federal financial assistance from NASA does not include assistance approved prior to the beginning of a hearing under § 1252.405(a)(1).
( 2 ) NASA will not begin a deferral until the recipient has received a notice of an opportunity for a hearing under § 1252.405(a)(1). NASA will not continue a deferral for more than 60 days unless a hearing has begun within that time or the time for beginning the hearing has been extended by mutual consent of the recipient and the Administrator. NASA will not continue a deferral for more than 30 days after the close of the hearing, unless the hearing results in a finding against the recipient.
[50 FR 13311, Apr. 4, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51352, Aug. 26, 2003]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John E. Hamilton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: March 31, 2006

 

 

| By:    | /s/ John E. Hamilton    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | John E. Hamilton        |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.1

                          February 15, 2003 ADDENDUM TO
                   WAREHOUSING LINE OF CREDIT PROMISSORY NOTE
                       Originally Dated February 20, 2002


         On February 20, 2002, Temporary Financial Services, Inc. ("TFS") and
Genesis Financial, Inc. ("GENESIS") entered into a Warehousing Line of Credit
Promissory Note and related loan documents (collectively the "Line of Credit")
for a $2,000,000 secured line of credit. TFS was the lender and GENESIS was the
borrower under these documents. The Line was intended to provide GENESIS with
funds for the purchase of seller financed real estate contracts. The Warehousing
Line of Credit Promissory Note is due by its terms on February 15, 2003.

         In January, 2003, TFS and GENESIS agreed that an extension of the line
of credit would be needed as GENESIS was not yet in a position to obtain funding
from other sources or through other means. TFS agreed to extend the line of
credit through August 15, 2003 in order to allow TFS and GENESIS to negotiate
new terms for the Line of Credit. On February 15, 2003, TFS and GENESIS entered
into this Addendum to the Warehousing Line of Credit Agreement.

         This Addendum changes the due date for the Warehousing Line of Credit
Promissory Note to August 15, 2003. All other terms of the Line of Credit remain
in full force and effect, including the "Advance and Repayment Procedures," the
"Financial Covenants and Reporting Obligations," the "Security Agreement," and
the "Guaranty."

         TFS and GENESIS agree to negotiate in good faith for an extension of
the Line of Credit and agree to execute an appropriate agreement reflecting the
additional extension as soon as the terms are agreed upon, but in no event later
than August 15, 2003.

         Dated this 15th day of February, 2003.

GENESIS FINANCIAL, INC.                       ATTEST:


/s/ Michael A. Kirk, President                /s/ Douglas B. Durham, Chairman




Accepted this 15th day of February, 2002 in Spokane, Washington.

Temporary Financial Services, Inc.             Attest:


/s/ John R. Coghlan, President                 /s/ Brad E. Herr, Secretary


                                 10-QSB Page 22
<PAGE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00397

- CR
Luis Ernesto Ortega

- Zavala v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 2nd 25th District Court of Gonzales County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- 20

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having con sidered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 10, 2023
#### J. W. WHISENHUNT et al *v.*PIKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al

5-5883

479 S.W. 2d 854

Opinion delivered May 8, 1972

*Dan McCraw,*for appellants.

*Ray Thornton,*Atty. Gen., by: *Henry Ginger,*Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellees.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellants J. W. Whisenhunt, Louis Smith and Kenny McGrew filed an affidavit for appeal from the actions or nonactions of the Pike, Hot Spring, Garland and Montgomery County Boards of Education. Attached to the affidavit was a petition signed by thirteen persons alleged to be qualified electors of Glenwood School District No. 43 of Garland, Pike and Hot Spring Counties. The petition requested that Caney Township of Montgomery County be annexed to the Glenwood School Disctict No. 43. The record of the proceedings before the Garland County Board of Education was certified and filed. Since the other County Boards either refused to act or took no action at all, appellants petitioned the trial court to issue a writ of certiorari to the Pike, Hot Spring and Montgomery County Boards for a record of the proceedings before them in regard to the petitions. The trial court denied the request for the writ of certiorari.

Upon appeal appellants assert that since their petitions were being presented pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 80-414 (Repl. 1960), they were entitled to the writ of *538certiorari as a matter of right. We do not agree. As we read Ark. Stat Ann. § 80-414 County Boards of Education are only required to act in two *instances*— i.e. (1) they must consider formation of a district upon a petition of a majority of the qualified electors in the area affected, and (2) they may call an election upon petition of ten percent of the qualified electors in the territory affected. Here neither the affidavit for appeal nor the petition for writ of certiorari alleges any facts that would require any action on behalf of the County Boards involved.

Affirmed.