alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05546

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 05546\05546_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05546\05546_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05546\05546_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05546\05546_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05546\05546_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05546\05546_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05546\05546_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05546\05546_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05546\05546_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05546\Certification Statement_05546.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05546\Supporting Documentation\05546_A5-2 aerial map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05546\Supporting Documentation\A5-3 water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Sl()-l()()3()9-()2 3 MIIWAUKI I COUNTY' S 

# ri l

C E N i n AI 

# MITCHEL L INTIRNATIONA L AIKCOK T

Marc h 1,201 0 Th e Honorabl e Raymon d H . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve , S E Washirigtbri i D

C 2059 0 • Docket 0bf-tfST-2dlG-003 4 >.:.-:-•?:• • ^it:i'/>r-'v-i^'''.''n - De^rIVI^JSi^refalry:^- ' -'i'''" ' •v«" ••-"i ? Than k yo u fo rth e opportunit yt o expres s m ysupport fo rth e applicatio n fo rantitrus t immunit yan d propose d join t busines s agreemen t file d b yAmerica n Airline s an d Japa n Airlines . Th e propose d allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita l fo rth e oneworl d allianc e t o effectivel yserve trans-Pacifi croutes . Thi s increase d allianc e competitio n wil l i n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s o fth e Department' s Ope n Skies policy-firs t b ysolidifyin g U.S . -Japa n Ope n Skies , the n b yservin g a

s a foundatio n fo rfurthe r liberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte ra thoroug h review , I encourag e th e Departmen t o fTransportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t woul d enabl e thes e oneworl d allianc e airline s t o wor k closel ytogethe rt o delive rhighl ycompetitiv e ai r transport«itio n services . Approva l fo rAA/JA l allianc e wil l have a positive - impac t o n ai rtrave i byofferin g customer s mor e service > schedulin g an d pricin g option s an d wil l hel p t o ensur e tha t customers continu e t o benefi t fro m th e competitio n afforde d b ythre e competitiv e ai ralliances . I urg e yo u t o quickl yapprov e thi s application . Your s ver ytruly . y - r•-'•:•::\i^.'-:'.if;- , • ; .....frl.i , 2 ' IL . C . Barr yBatemah , Airpor t Directo r 'Genera i Mitchell'lhternationa l Airpor t 530 0 S . Howel l Avenu e •Milwaukee , W l 5320 7 -^ ^ Bbatemang)mitchellairport.co m

S30 0 SOUT H HOWEL L AVENU E MILWAUKEE , W l 53207.6IS 6 TE L 41 4 74 7 530 0 FA X 41 4 74 7 452 S
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0055 

Standard Review Draft 12/24/2008 Revision 05/26/2009 

ENGINEER: Arnold \ CPW 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER:

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No 

Gen Eqpt: safety glasses or goggles/ chemical resistant gloves 

and protective clothing/ adequate ventilation 

Respirator: follow OSHA respirator regulations 

Health Effects: Irritating to eyes and respiratory system/ 

slight skin irritation may occur/ may irritate gastrointestinal 

tract/ mucus membrane irritant 

TLV/PEL: 

none established 

CRSS : 

Chemical Name: [5,6]Fullerene-C70-D5h(6) 

S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @ 

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ 

MW: 841.00 %<500 %<1000 

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: 

Neat: Mfg: Proc/Form: End Use: 
Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (11/21/2008): 

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

. 

Migration to groundwater: U 

PBT rating: P1B1T1 LVE PBT Rating is PU BU T1 

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation 

Eco: 1 No releases to Water 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2B 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: 

P2 Claim:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No 
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0055 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may 

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same 

medium. Note: Water not required per SAT. 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis:

Inhalation: 
Dermal:
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0055 

 

Number of Sites/ Location:

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may 

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same 

medium. Note: Water not required per SAT. 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis:
Inhalation:

Dermal:
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0055 

Number of Sites/ Location:

unknown site(s) 

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may 

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same 

medium. Note: Water not required per SAT. 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis: 
Inhalation:

Dermal:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-70331) of our report dated
January 27, 1999, except as to Notes 3 and 11, which are as of March 15, 1999,
appearing on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to 
the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement 
Schedule, which appears on page S-1 of such Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 30, 1999
----

Action brought on 10 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-137/06)

(2006/C 131/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and D. Lawunmi, Agents)

Defendant: Ireland

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 18 July 2004.

----

(1)  OJ L 189, p. 12

----
§ 25.147 Directional and lateral control. ( a ) *Directional control; general.* It must be possible, with the wings level, to yaw into the operative engine and to safely make a reasonably sudden change in heading of up to 15 degrees in the direction of the critical inoperative engine. This must be shown at 1.3 V*S*R1 for heading changes up to 15 degrees (except that the heading change at which the rudder pedal force is 150 pounds need not be exceeded), and with— ( 1 ) The critical engine inoperative and its propeller in the minimum drag position;
( 2 ) The power required for level flight at 1.3 *V* *S*R1, but not more than maximum continuous power;
( 3 ) The most unfavorable center of gravity;
( 4 ) Landing gear retracted;
( 5 ) Flaps in the approach position; and
( 6 ) Maximum landing weight.
( b ) *Directional control; airplanes with four or more engines.* Airplanes with four or more engines must meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section except that— ( 1 ) The two critical engines must be inoperative with their propellers (if applicable) in the minimum drag position;
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) The flaps must be in the most favorable climb position.
( c ) *Lateral control; general.* It must be possible to make 20° banked turns, with and against the inoperative engine, from steady flight at a speed equal to 1.3 *V* *S*R1, with— ( 1 ) The critical engine inoperative and its propeller (if applicable) in the minimum drag position;
( 2 ) The remaining engines at maximum continuous power;
( 3 ) The most unfavorable center of gravity;
( 4 ) Landing gear ( i ) retracted and
( ii ) extended;
( 5 ) Flaps in the most favorable climb position; and
( 6 ) Maximum takeoff weight.
( d ) *Lateral control; roll capability.* With the critical engine inoperative, roll response must allow normal maneuvers. Lateral control must be sufficient, at the speeds likely to be used with one engine inoperative, to provide a roll rate necessary for safety without excessive control forces or travel.
( e ) *Lateral control; airplanes with four or more engines.* Airplanes with four or more engines must be able to make 20° banked turns, with and against the inoperative engines, from steady flight at a speed equal to 1.3 *V* *S*R1, with maximum continuous power, and with the airplane in the configuration prescribed by paragraph (b) of this section.
( f ) *Lateral control; all engines operating.* With the engines operating, roll response must allow normal maneuvers (such as recovery from upsets produced by gusts and the initiation of evasive maneuvers). There must be enough excess lateral control in sideslips (up to sideslip angles that might be required in normal operation), to allow a limited amount of maneuvering and to correct for gusts. Lateral control must be enough at any speed up to *V* *FC*/*M* *FC* to provide a peak roll rate necessary for safety, without excessive control forces or travel.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-42, 43 FR 2321, Jan. 16, 1978; Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29774, July 20, 1990; Amdt. 25-108, 67 FR 70827, Nov. 26, 2002; Amdt. 25-115, 69 FR 40527, July 2, 2004]
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



Exhibit 10.1B  


 
  Management Incentive Plan
  Restricted Stock—Terms Sheet    
    





        Pursuant
to the terms and conditions of the SLM Corporation Management Incentive Plan ("MIP"), the Committee hereby grants to C.E. Andrews (the "Executive") 10,000 shares of common stock
("Restricted Stock") of the Corporation (the "Company") upon his initial date of employment ("Start Date") subject to the following terms and conditions: 



	•
	One-third
of the Restricted Stock will vest upon the later of the first anniversary of the Start Date and the date that the Company announces its 2003 fiscal
year results; provided that the Company has positive "core cash basis" net income for the 2003 fiscal year; one-third will vest upon the later of the second anniversary of the Start Date
and the date that the Company announces its 2004 fiscal year results; provided that the Company has positive "core cash basis" net income for the 2004 fiscal; and one-third will vest upon
the later of the third anniversary of the Start Date and the date that the Company announces its 2005 fiscal year results; provided that the Company has positive "core cash basis" net income for the
2005 fiscal year. Except as provided below, if Executive ceases to be an employee of the Company (or one of its subsidiaries) for any reason, he shall forfeit any shares of Restricted Stock that have
not vested as of the date of such termination of employment.



	•
	Unless
previously vested pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the Restricted Stock will vest upon Executive's death, Disability, Termination By Executive For Good Reason,
Termination By
Company Without Cause or Change in Control, all as those terms are defined in the employment agreement between Executive and the Company effective as of February 24, 2003.



	•
	During
the period that any portion of the Restricted Stock remains unvested, an amount equivalent to any dividend payments made on SLM common stock will be paid on such
unvested Restricted Stock to Executive as wages, payable through the Company's payroll system.



	•
	Executive
may at any time elect to have a sufficient number of shares of the Company's stock withheld by the Company to satisfy his income and employment tax withholding
requirements that accrue upon the Restricted Stock becoming vested and transferable, and approves the transfer of such shares to the Company for purposes of SEC Rule 16b-3. 



1













QuickLinks


Management Incentive Plan Restricted Stock—Terms Sheet
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 25894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11151]



[[Page 25894]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

37 CFR Part 201

[Docket No. RM 99-7C]


Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection 
Systems for Access Control Technologies

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Announcement of change in time a hearing will begin.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Copyright Office of the Library of Congress announces a 
change in the time of a public hearing on the possible exemptions to 
the prohibition against circumvention of technological measures that 
control access to copyrighted works to be held in Stanford, California 
on May 18, 2000. The date and location of the hearing remain unchanged

DATES: May 4, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Kasunic, Senior Attorney, 
Office of the General Counsel, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, 
Southwest Station, Washington, D.C. 20024. Telephone: (202) 707-8380. 
Telefax: (202) 707-8366.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Copyright Office is conducting a 
rulemaking pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 1201(a)(1), which provides that the 
Librarian of Congress may exempt certain classes of works from the 
prohibition against circumventing a technological measure that controls 
access to a copyrighted work. On March 17, 2000 (65 FR 14505), the 
Office published a notice which announced that public hearings relative 
to the rulemaking would be held in Washington, DC on May 2-4, 2000, and 
in Stanford, California on May 18 and 19, 2000. A schedule for all of 
the hearings can be found on the office's website at www.loc.gov/copyright/1201/hearing.html. The Stanford hearings were scheduled to be 
held from 9:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The hearing on May 18, 2000, is now 
scheduled to begin at 2:00 p.m. rather than 9:30 a.m.

    Dated: May 1, 2000.
Marilyn J. Kretsinger,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-11151 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: January 26, 2000.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: 6100 Executive Blvd., DSR Conf. Rm., Rockville, MD 20852, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Hameed Khan, PHD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 
6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 10, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-1131 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Unaudited.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         501,181
<SECURITIES>                                 1,979,275
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (46,150)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,293,615
<PP&E>                                      38,280,806
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,627,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,925,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,045,550
<BONDS>                                     27,548,466
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,925,992
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,646,628
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,268,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               950,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,792,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,306)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 27.341 Gust loads.

The rotorcraft must be designed to withstand, at each critical airspeed including hovering, the loads resulting from a vertical gust of 30 feet per second.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                     140
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             7046
<ALLOWANCES>                                               231
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          7496
<PP&E>                                                    7100
<DEPRECIATION>                                            3385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           11313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     4550
<BONDS>                                                    400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                    38
<OTHER-SE>                                                6325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             11313
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         12304
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            10035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          1890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            31
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            296
<INCOME-TAX>                                               118
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        178
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                               178
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .05
                                                     
                                                     

</TABLE>
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com]

Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 3:23 PM

To: Thomas Patzner; Eduardo Robles; Bob Smith; Rob Greeson; Vijay Tendulkar; Dhiru Patel; Bill Forsythe; Michael Rivest; Brian Coffey; Matthew Nard otti; Caitlin Johnson; Chris Bolduc; Katie Coughlin; John Cymbalsky; Dan Cohen; Freeman, Jeremiah; Caskey, John; Creevy, Jim Subject: Re: LV Transformer Reg-Neg: Wrapping up

PS Also attached is a copy of Schneider's analys is supporting its most recent proposal. You may have received this previously.

Richard

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Richard Parker < richardparkerdc@gmail.com > wrote: Dear Industry and DOE Colleagues,

As 2011 draws to a close, we find ourselves hopef ully nearer but not quite at a group consensus on energy efficiency standards for low-voltage tran sformers. I am hopeful we can still get there early in the New Year.

The attached file contains the Schneider Elect ric revised proposal, and a compilation of the emailed industry responses to that proposal that I've received so far. If you have not done so already, it would be very helpful if you could, earl y next week, review the proposal, talk to Tom Patzner and/or Navigant regard ing your thoughts and concerns, a nd put forward either agreement to the proposal or any specific modifications th at you would propose to make to it (along the lines of the Hammond response).

Meanwhile, enjoy the weekend, have a happy a nd safe New Year, and I look forward to resuming and hopefully wrapping up our work next week.

All best,

Richard Parker

Facilitator