alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Martin, Michael (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: Joseph D. Gray <supervisor@town.massena.ny.us> Friday, December 21, 2012 5:00 PM Martin, Michael (OST) Town of Massena NY Comments on EAS Selection

# ~own

# of :Massena, :New**'lor~** P.sta6{is/ied: 1802 %wnJfa{[ 315-769-3588 609dainStreet (Pa.J(j315-769-0578 9dassena, :New r'forft13662 littp://www.massenawor&s.com/town/itufex.asp 

## Councifmen: CJ@6ert Cunningliam, Jolin :Macaufay, Cliarfes**(]@,it~**

## )1.C6ertWicofa Supervisor: Josepfi (]), qray December 21, 2012 Mr. Michael Martin United States Department ofTransportation Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small CommunityAirService Development Program (SCASDP) Washington, D.C. Dear Mr. Martin: On behalf of the Town of Massena and the Massena Town Council, I write to express our support for the selection of Cape Air as the Essential Air Service provider for the Massena International Airport. Specifically, we supportthe two-year proposal as submitted to your agency last month by Cape Air. For the past four years, Cape Air has provided reliable, affordable service to air travelers from the greater Massena area. Ourfirst experience was with Cape Airflights to Albany and it has been verywell received. During its second EAS contract, Cape Air expanded its offering by adding a connection from Albanyto Boston. As a result, ridership has soared and we are very pleased with the dramatic rise in enplanements. We believe are experience is a perfect example ofwhatthe Essential Air Service program is all about. Our rural community can easily make connections to the national air service network and fly to any destination in the world. Please accept ourthanks foryour Department's administration ofthis worthwhile program and for allowing us involvement in how decisions are made regarding our airservice. Sincerely,

1I i Joseph D. Gray, Supervisor Town ofMassena

2
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Corey E. Shaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/
                  Corey E. ShakerCorey
                  E. ShakerPresident
                  and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
                  24, 2006
#### § 234.8 Calculation of on-time performance codes.

(a) Each reporting carrier shall calculate an on-time performance code in accordance with this section and as provided in more detail in accounting and reporting directives issued by the Director, Office of Airline Information. The calculations shall be performed for each reportable flight, except those scheduled to operate three times or less during a month. In addition, each reporting carrier shall assign an on-time performance code to each of its single plane one-stop or multi-stop flights, or portion thereof, that the carrier holds out to the public through a CRS, the last segment of which is a reportable flight.

(b) The on-time performance code shall be calculated as follows:

(1) Based on reportable flight data provided to the Department, calculate the percentage of on-time arrivals of each nonstop flight. Calculations shall not include discontinued or extra-section flights for which data are not reported to the Department.

(2) Based upon the on-time performance percentage calculated in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, assign a single digit code to each flight that reflects the percentile of on-time performance achieved by the flight, as set forth in the following table:

| Code: | Percentage |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | 90-100 |
| 8 | 80-89.9 |
| 7 | 70-79.9 |
| 6 | 60-69.9 |
| 5 | 50-59.9 |
| 4 | 40-49.9 |
| 3 | 30-39.9 |
| 2 | 20-29.9 |
| 1 | 10-19.9 |
| 0 | 0-9.9 |

On Time Performance

(3) For a one-stop or multi-stop flight, or portion thereof, listed in a CRS, the performance code for the nonstop flight segment arriving at the destination listed in the CRS shall be used.

(4) In the case of a new flight, carriers shall assign a performance code consisting of the letter “N.” A flight that is not a new flight shall be assigned the performance code calculated for the flight that it replaces, even if the two flights do not have the same flight number. In the case of a flight scheduled to operate three times or less during a month, carriers shall assign a performance code consisting of the letter “U.”

(c) Carriers shall calculate on-time performance percentages and assign on-time performance codes on a monthly basis. This process shall be completed no later than the 15th day of each month, when the reports required by this part are due to the Department, and the codes shall reflect the previous month's operations.

[Amdt. 234-1, 52 FR 34071, Sept. 9, 1987, as amended by Amdt. 234-3, 52 FR 48397, Dec. 22, 1987; 53 FR 27677, July 22, 1988; Doc. No. 48524, 59 FR 49798, Sept. 30, 1994; 60 FR 66722, Dec. 26, 1995]
#### Bergner *et al. v.*Kaufmann *et al.*

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

November 29, 1892.)

Design Patents—Patentability—Album Cases.

Design patent No. 20,347, issued November 25, 1890, to Frederick Bergner, for an album case set upright on a baseboard, and having on its exterior an oval, ornamental frame, with an open center, is invalid, since the patentee invented neither the album case nor the ornamental frame, but merely conceived the idea of placing the ornament on the case; and this conception is not patentable, for the statute only provides for patents on designs for articles of manufacture and for ornaments to be placed upon or worked into such articles.

In Equity. Suit by Frederick Bergner and others against Isaac Kaufmann and others for infringement of a patent. Bill dismissed.

*W. P. Preble,*Jr., for orators.

*A. v.*Briesen, for defendants. .

Wheeler, District Judge.

This suit is brought upon design patent No. 20,347, dated November 25, 1890, for an album case set on a baseboard in an upright or nearly vertical position, having on its exterior an. oval, ornamental frame with an open center. The defendants put dimond-shaped mirrors, with such ornamental borders, on similar album cases. This style of album case is not new. The patent therefore must be held to be for an ornament upon the case as an article of manu*819facture, under the third clause of section 4929, Rev. St., providing for design patents. Such ornamental frames were old, and well and generally known. The orator, who is the patentee, testifies, in answer to question 25: “I make no claim to be the designer of this frame.” Besides this, the defendants’ mirror does not look like this frame, and would not infringe the patent for this ornament.

The orator did not design an album case, proper; nor an ornament, proper, for an album case; but he appears to have conceived the idea of placing such an ornament upon an album case. The statute provides for patents upon designs for articles of manufacture, and for patents upon ornaments to be placed upon or worked into such articles, but does not appear to provide for a patent for the mere placing of an ornament on such articles. This patent does not, therefore, appear to be valid, or to be infringed. Let a decree be entered dismissing the bill.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25939-25940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11135]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-934-5700; COC62391, COC62392, COC62431]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Leases

    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
leases, COC62391, COC62392, and COC62431, for lands in San Miguel and 
Montrose counties, Colorado, were timely filed and were accompanied by 
all the required rentals accruing from the date of termination.
    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year 
and 16 2/3 percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and Bureau of Land Management is 
proposing to reinstate leases

[[Page 25940]]

COC62391, COC62392, and COC62431 effective December 1, 1999, subject to 
the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental 
and royalty rates cited above.

Kathleen L. Toth,
Land Law Examiner, Oil and Gas Lease Maintenance.
[FR Doc. 00-11135 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11186]



[[Page 25963]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Meeting of the National Museum Services Board

AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the agenda of a forthcoming meeting of 
the National Museum Services Board. This notice also describes the 
function of the board. Notice of this meeting is required under the 
Government through the Federal Advisory Committee Act 5 U.S.C. App., 
and regulations of the Institute of Museum and Library Services, 45 CFR 
1180.84.
    Time/Date: 1:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 18, 2000.
    Status: Open.
    Address: The Walter Art Gallery, Hackerman House Conference Room, 
600 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD2 20004, (410) 547-9000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Lyons, Special Assistant to 
the Director, Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 510, Washington, DC 20506, (202) 606-
4649.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Museum Services Board is 
established pursuant to 20 U.S.C. Section 9175. The Board has 
responsibility for the general policies with respect to the powers, 
duties, and authorities vested in the Institute under the Museum 
Services Act.
    The meeting on Thursday, May 18, 2000 will be open to the public. 
If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please contact: 
Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20506--(202) 606-8536--TDD (202) 606-8636 at least seven 
(7) days prior to the meeting date.

Agenda

78th Meeting of the National Museum Services Board in The Hackerman 
House Conference Room at the Walter Art Gallery, 600 N. Charles Street, 
Baltimore, MD 21201 on Thursday, May 18, 2000, 1:30 pm-3:30 pm

I. Chairperson's Welcome and Minutes of the 77th NMSB Meeting--
November 5, 2000
II. Director's Report
III. Departmental Reports
    Legislative/Public Affairs Report
    Office of Research and Technology Report
    Office of Museum Services Program Report
    Office of Library Services Program Report
IV. Museums, Libraries and the 21st Century Learner
V. Perspectives on Fundraising

    Dated: April 28, 2000.
Linda Bell,
Director of Policy, Planning and Budget, National Foundation on the 
Arts and Humanities, Institute of Museum and Library Services.
[FR Doc. 00-11186 Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 70386-01-M
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05135

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05135\05135_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05135\05135_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05135\05135_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05135\05135_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05135\Certification Statement Plant ID 05135.pdf Plant certification statement

05135\Supplemental Documents\05135_FEC Map-1.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05135\Supplemental Documents\05135_FEC Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05135\Supplemental Documents\05135_FEC WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05135\05135_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05135\05135_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05135\Supplemental Documents\05135_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
AUG-20-2014 08=12 FAA RENTON 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Memorandum To Docket No. FAA-2014-0184 

-·· r1 

P.02/02 

~: """F ') .) i:... 

Date:. August 13,2014 ~ 

From: Jeffrey E. Duven~ Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft~ ~ Certification Service 

Prepared by: Ian Won, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch,ANM ... J15 

Subject: Documentation of Support for Operations of the United States Department of 

Defense as related to Petition for Exemption 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has held discussions with the United Stat~s (US) 

Department of Defense (DoD) regarding commercial air carrier all cargo operational support for 

the DoD mission to remove military equipment out of Afghanistan by the end of2014. This DoD 

effort began in 2013, involving the movement of approximately 24~000 vehicles and 20,000 

shipping containers. In discussions with the DoD, DoD representatives have indicated that one 

mode of transit employed by the DoD to remove this cargo from Afghanistan is by the use of air 

cargo carriers. Statements made by the DoD are consistent with an article 1 published by Stars 

and Stripei with regard to the use of air cargo carriers for removal of equipment from 

Afghanistan. · 

The DoD is not involved with the regulation of the commercial air carrier all cargo operators, 

which falls under the purview of the FAA. Existing limitations in air carrier cargo operator 

manuals limit the amount of cargo that can be canied on Boeing 74 7 cargo airplanes, which is 

one of the primary airplane models used for this mission. Representatives of the DoD have 

indicated that these limitations may inhibit the ability of the DoD to meet their planned mission 

requirement to remove military equipment from Afghanistan by the end of 2014. 

On March 18, 2014~ Atlas Air, Inc., Kalitta Air, Inc., Southern Air, Inc~, and World Airways, 

Inc. petitioned3 the FAA to reduce regulatory requirements that would ease the current 

limitations in the air carrier cargo operator manuals. Although not specificaliy stated in the 

petition, this exemption! if granted, would allow the petitioners to better support the DoD 

mission. The FAA is currently considering this petition for exemption. 

1 Stars and Stripes article: http://www.stripes.com/news/us-seeks-to-move-more-gear-out-of"afghanistan"viafakistan-1.241022 · . 

Stars and Stripes is a product of the Defense Media Activity. Defense Media Activity is an agency of the 

Department of Defen$e that provides a direct line of communication for new$ and information. 3 Federal Docket Management System: http://www.regulations/gov. Docket No. FAA-2014-0184. 

TOTAL P.02
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

MAR 14 2011 Barry Wallerstein, Env.D. 

Executive Director 

South Coast AQMD 

21865 Copley Drive 

Diamond Bar, CA 91765 

Re: Final Technical System Audit Report on the South Coast Air Quality Management District 

Ambiwality Monitoring Program, April 13 - 16, 2010 

Dear a::_:~stein:

I am writing to transmit EPA's report on the findings of our Technical System Audit 

(TSA) of SCAQMD's ambient air monitoring program. This audit was performed in accordance 

with 40 CPR Part 58, Section 2.5, which requires that EPA conduct technical system audits of 

Primary Quality Assurance Organizations every three years. 

EPA reviewed SCAQMD's ambient air monitoring program, including network 

management, field operations, laboratory operations, quality assurance, and data management 

procedures. Overall, we found that SCAQMD has a robust air monitoring program that 

generally meets or exceeds EPA requirements. As with any audit, this TSA uncovered some 

program areas within the agency that can be improved. We look forward to working together as 

you develop a corrective action response to our audit findings, which is due within 60 days of 

receipt of the final TSA report. 

I want to thank you and your staff for the full cooperation and participation we were 

given during the audit. The results of this audit contribute to EPA's overall understanding of 

ambient monitoring in your District. 

Please contact me if you have questions or your staff may contact Meredith Kurpius at 

(415) 947-4534 or Matthew Lakin at (415) 972-3851. 

Sincerely, 

jU/Yl 

Deborah Jord 

Director, Air Division 

Enclosure 

cc:	 Dr. Chung S. Liu, SCAQMD
 

Rudy Eden, SCAQMD
 

Dr. Phillip M. Fine, SCAQMD
 

Dr. Jason C. Low, SCAQMD
 

Printed on Recycled Paper
§ 121.601 Aircraft dispatcher information to pilot in command: Domestic and flag operations. ( a ) The aircraft dispatcher shall provide the pilot in command all available current reports or information on airport conditions and irregularities of navigation facilities that may affect the safety of the flight.
( b ) Before beginning a flight, the aircraft dispatcher shall provide the pilot in command with all available weather reports and forecasts of weather phenomena that may affect the safety of flight, including adverse weather phenomena, such as clear air turbulence, thunderstorms, and low altitude wind shear, for each route to be flown and each airport to be used.
( c ) During a flight, the aircraft dispatcher shall provide the pilot in command any additional available information of meteorological conditions (including adverse weather phenomena, such as clear air turbulence, thunderstorms, and low altitude wind shear), and irregularities of facilities and services that may affect the safety of the flight.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19222, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-134, 42 FR 27573, May 31, 1977; Amdt. 121-144, 43 FR 22649, May 25, 1978; Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2614, Jan. 26, 1996]
#### Elisha Hathaway *v.*Henry Lewis, Adm’r, etc.

(No. 9,091.)

1. An action of foreclosure and for the sale of mortgaged premises can he maintained, in case of the death of the mortgagor, before the expiration of the period limited hy the 98th section of the act to provide for the settlement of the estates of deceased persons.

2. In some cases the remedy for the debt may he lost or suspended, and yet the right to proceed on a security givén for the debt will not he affected.

Special Term. — On demurrer to petition.

This is an action brought for a foreclosure and the sale of mortgaged premises, the mortgagor having deceased. The administrator and heirs are the parties defendant. A demurrer has been filed to the petition by the administrator.

*Mills & Hoadly*for plaintiff.

*Flamen Ball*for defendants.

Gholson, J.

Several grounds have been assigned, but all really depend on the same question — whether the action can be maintained until the period limited by the 98th section of the act “ to provide for the settlement of the estates of deceased persons ” has expired. This is a question of construction, depending upon the consideration whether it was the intention of the legislature to suspend, not only the remedy for the debt, but the remedy upon any security which may have been given by the debtor.

I think it can not be questioned, that in some eases the *261remedy for the debt may be lost or suspended, and yet the right to proceed on a security given for the debt will not be affected. Cases of this kind are found in our reports. 4 O. S. 197. *Hollister*v. *Dillon.*

It does not, therefore, follow, as claimed by counsel, that it is a necessary consequence of the suspension of a remedy by action on the debt, that the right to proceed, as it were *in rem,*to subject the thing pledged for the payment of the debt, has been disturbed. This conclusion is strengthened by an expression in the statute, that it is not applicable when the demand is one which would not be affected by the insolvency of the estate. Such is the case of a mortgage security. In the present case no personal judgment is asked, and I am unable to see anything to prevent a proceeding to enforce the specific lien which the creditor has secured.

It is said that a judgment creditor would not be allowed to proceed; but the lien of a judgment is general, not specific; it arises from the operation of law, and not by the contract or deed of the party, and the same principle does-not apply. The demurrer, therefore, will be overruled.

Demurrer overruled.
#### § 25.235 Taxiing condition.

The shock absorbing mechanism may not damage the structure of the airplane when the airplane is taxied on the roughest ground that may reasonably be expected in normal operation.