alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40789

Conference Calendar

 

STANLEY T. ALEXANDER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ORLANDO PEREZ; R. WALLACE; ANGLE, Ms.; GEORGE

STEPHENSON; DAVID. M. BLACKWELL; DONALD J. HULSEY,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-98-CV-20

- - - - - - - - - -

June 15, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stanley T. Alexander (#695814), a state prisoner, has

appealed the magistrate judge’s judgment dismissing his civil

rights action as frivolous. Alexander contends that the district

court dismissed his due process and retaliation claims

prematurely. Alexander has no cognizable claim related to his

custody classification. Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472 (1995);

see Madison v. Parker, 104 F.3d 765, 768 (5th Cir. 1997). The

magistrate judge did not abuse her discretion in determining that
No. 98-40789 

-2-

Alexander had failed to allege a chronology of events from which

it could be inferred that the defendants were motivated to

retaliate against him. See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299,

310 (5th Cir. 1997); Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir.

1995). 

Alexander contends that the magistrate judge was biased

against him. Adverse rulings alone do not call into question a

judge’s impartiality. Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555

(1994).

In the district court, Alexander contended that the

defendants conspired against him, that Wallace was not properly

trained and supervised, and that his right to equal protection

had been violated. Alexander has abandoned these issues by

failing to present any argument regarding them on appeal. See

Applewhite v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc., 67 F.3d 571, 573 (5th

Cir. 1995). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a

strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Alexander

that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in

forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-4745

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT OSCAR RANDOLPH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CR-96-6-B)

Submitted: October 7, 1997 Decided: December 2, 1997

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory M. Stewart, STEWART LAW OFFICES, P.C., Norton, Virginia,

for Appellant. Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Rick

A. Mountcastle, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Oscar Randolph appeals from his conviction and sentence

for possession of a firearm following a felony conviction in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (1994). Specifically, Randolph contends

that the district court erred in denying his request for a reduction under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1 (1995), for

acceptance of responsibility where he admitted to possession of the

firearm but denied firing it, running from the police, throwing the

gun away during the police chase, and threatening his wife and her

family if she testified against him. The district court found

Randolph's denials of these actions to be unbelievable, and for

that reason not an acceptance of responsibility sufficient to

justify denial of a USSG § 3E1.1 reduction. Our review reveals that

this decision was not clearly erroneous. See United States v.

Myers, 66 F.3d 1364, 1372 (4th Cir. 1995) (holding that sentencing

court may look beyond facts that constitute conviction even if

factors are insufficiently relevant to increase sentence). We

further note that Randolph received an enhancement under USSG §

3C1.1, rendering a § 3E1.1 reduction generally inappropriate. See

USSG § 3E1.1, comment. (n.4). Accordingly, we affirm Randolph's

conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[FE Docket No. 96-07-NG]


Office of Fossil Energy; BC Gas Utility Ltd.; Order Amending 
Authorization To Import and Export Natural Gas From and to Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order to BC Gas Utility Ltd. amending the 
natural gas import and export authorization granted by DOE/FE Order 
No.1149 (1 FE para. 71,240). Order 1149-A extends the term from May 1, 
2000, through April 30, 2002, and increases the annual limit from 5 
billion cubic feet (Bcf) to 6 Bcf. Under the import/export arrangement, 
Canadian natural gas will be imported through the existing pipeline 
facilities at Sumas, Washington, and Eastport, Idaho, for storage at 
the Jackson Prairie Storage Field in Washington State, and then 
exported back to Canada.
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Natural Gas & Petroleum Import & Export Activities docket room, 3E-033, 
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC, 
20585, (202) 586-9478. The docket room is open between the hours of 
8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 21, 2000.
John W. Glynn,
Manager, Natural Gas Regulation, Office of Natural Gas & Petroleum 
Import and Export Activities, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 00-10894 Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00361

- CV

In the INTEREST OF S.B.W. and C.N.W.

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 01354

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of termination is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED September 11, 2013.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Gibbons 

, J. 

, J. 

conclusively establishes Christopherson's conviction of serious crimes 

warranting a temporary suspension. 2 See SCR 111(1), (6), (7). 

Accordingly, we temporarily suspend Christopherson from the practice of 

law and refer this matter to the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board for 

the initiation of formal disciplinary proceedings in which the sole issue to 

be determined is the extent of discipline to be imposed. See SCR 111(8). 

It is so ORDERED. 

Douglas 

Saitta 

, J. 

cc: Glenn M. Machado, Assistant Bar Counsel 

Jeffrey R. Albregts, Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Ian Christopherson 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

2Christopherson has filed a letter indicating that he does not oppose 

a temporary suspension "pending resolution of [his] appeal." The letter 

also appears to briefly address the merits of Christopherson's federal 

appeal and express difficulties he is having addressing his legal matters 

from prison. To the extent that Christopherson's letter requests any relief 

related to his federal appeal or his incarceration, we note that this 

proceeding is not the appropriate forum to address such concerns, and we 

will take no further action with respect to the letter filed on June 5, 2013. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A a 

i'IMMN/BWMIfflitkAlrvf,Mt. g?1M
exv10w5xay



 



EXHIBIT 10.5(a)



Schedule of officers of Digene Corporation entering into Change in Control Employment Agreements



     The following officers of Digene Corporation entered into Change in
Control Employment Agreements substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.5 to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q during the quarter ended March 31, 2003:



	 	Robert McG. Lilley

Joseph P. Slattery

Larry R. Wellman
Page 1 of 1

Date: March 14, 2013

MEMORANDUM

TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0542

SUBJECT: Meeting with Malaysia Palm Oil Council

On March 14, 2013, EPA met with a delegation led by the Malaysia Palm Oil Council 

(MPOC). EPA provided an update informing the delegation that the Agency continues to 

carefully review the comments received on the January 2012 Notice of Data Availability

(NODA) concerning palm oil biofuels. The MPOC delegation discussed recent developments in 

the Malaysian palm oil industry. Discussion topics included:

 Methane capture at palm oil mills, including the challenging economics of such 

projects for mills located far from the electricity grid.

 Fast pyrolysis oil technology to convert oil palm biomass into bio-oil and bio-char, 

which is in the demonstration phase of development.

 Biodiesel production and blending mandates in Malaysia.

 Land availability for oil palm expansion in Malaysian.

Delegation from Malaysia:

1. Yusof Basiron, Malaysia Palm Oil Council

2. PM Koh, Lipochem Sdn Bhd

3. Johari Minal, Embassy of Malaysia

4. Ahmad Fadzli Abdul Aziz, American Palm Oil Council 

EPA Participants:

1. Sharyn Lie, Center Director, Climate Economics and Modeling Center

2. Aaron Levy, Program Analyst, Office of Transportation and Air Quality

3. Mark Kasman, Office of International and Tribal Affairs

State Department Participants:

1. David Turnbull, Malaysia Desk
180320 JOSUE VERA AND MICHAEL OLIVERAS LIFT STAY SCH ORD VERSION MARCH 20, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY

The Court has received and reviewed the Unopposed Motion for Relief from 

Automatic Stay (the “Motion”) filed by Josue Ismael Saavedra Vera and Michael Angelo Rivera 

Oliveras (the “Movant”). (Docket Entry No. 2769.) Opposition papers to the Motion must be 

filed by April 3, 2018. Movant’s reply papers must be filed by April 10, 2018. The Court will 

thereafter take the Motion on submission, unless a party thereto requests a hearing.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 20, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation 

(“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 

17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System 

of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power 

Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2771 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 16:17:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# AGENCY:

 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC) on November 19, 1990, to provide independent advice and counsel to EPA on policy issues associated with implementation of the Clean Air Act of 1990. The Committee advises on economic, environmental, technical scientific, and enforcement policy issues.

## Open Meeting Notice 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Section 10(a)(2), notice is hereby given that the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee will hold its next open meeting on Tuesday, February 15, 2000, from approximately 8:30 a.m. to 2:15 p.m. at the Washington Marriott Hotel, 1221 22d Street, NW, Washington, DC. Seating will be available on a first come, first served basis. Four of the CAAAC's Subcommittees (Linking Energy, Land Use, Transportation, and Air Quality Concerns Subcommittee; the Permits/NSR/Toxics Integration Subcommittee; the Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovations Subcommittee; and the Energy, Clean Air and Climate Change Subcommittee) will hold meetings on February 14, 2000. The Energy, Clean Air and Climate Change Subcommittee is scheduled to meet from 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.; the Linking Transportation Land Use and Air Quality Subcommittee is scheduled to meet From 12 a.m. to 3 p.m.; the Permits/NSR/topics Subcommittee is scheduled to meet from 3:15 p.m. to 5:45 p.m.; and the Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovations Subcommittee is scheduled to meet from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. All subcommittee se  linking meetings will be held at the Washington Marriott Hotel, the same location as the full Committee.

## Inspection of Committee Documents

The Committee agenda and any documents prepared for the meeting will be publicly available at the meeting. Thereafter, these documents, together with CAAAC meeting minutes, will be available by contacting the Office of Air and Radiation Docket and requesting information under docket item A-94-34 (CAAAC). The Docket office can be reached by telephoning 202-260-7548; FAX 202-260-4400.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Concerning this meeting of the full CAAAC, please contact Paul Rasmussen, Office of Air and Radiation, US EPA (202) 564-1306, FAX (202) 564-1352 or by mail at US EPA, Office of Air and Radiation (Mail code 6102 A), 401 M St. SW, Washington, DC 20460.

For information on the Subcommittee meetings, please contact the following individuals:

(1) Permits/NSR/Toxics Integration—Debbie Stackhouse, 919-541-5354; 

(2) Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovations—Carey Fitzmaurice, 202-564-1667; 

(3) Linking Transportation, Land Use and Air Quality Concerns—Gay MacGregor, 734-668-4438; and 

(4) Energy, Clean Air and Climate Change—Anna Garcia, 202-564-9492.

Additional information on these meetings and the CAAAC and its Subcommittees can be found on the CAAAC Web Site: www.epa.gov/​oar/​caaac/​.

Dated: January 10, 2000.

Robert D. Brenner,

Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.

[FR Doc. 00-1082 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3824 

To require the Federal Trade Commission to submit a report to Congress 

on scams targeting seniors, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2020 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Trade Commission to submit a report 

to Congress on scams targeting seniors, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Seniors 

5 from Emergency Scams Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FTC REPORT ON SCAMS TARGETING SENIORS DUR7 ING EMERGENCIES. 

8 Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 

9 of this Act, the Federal Trade Commission (referred to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3824 IS

1 in this Act as the ‘‘Commission’’) shall submit a report 

2 to Congress including— 

3 (1) a description of the number and types of 

4 scams identified by the Commission as being tar5 geted at senior citizens; and 

6 (2) policy recommendations to prevent such 

7 scams, especially as such scams relate to future na8 tional emergencies. 

9 SEC. 3. INCREASING AWARENESS OF SCAMS TARGETING 

10 SENIORS. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the 

12 date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall up13 date its web portal to include the latest information, 

14 searchable by region and type of scam, on scams targeting 

15 seniors, including contacts for relevant law enforcement 

16 and adult protective service agencies. 

17 (b) COORDINATION WITH MEDIA OUTLETS AND LAW

18 ENFORCEMENT.—The Commission shall work with media 

19 outlets and law enforcement to distribute the information 

20 included in the web portal of the Commission pursuant 

21 to subsection (a) to senior citizens and their families and 

22 caregivers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Attachment 38Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:24634-38   Filed:06/22/23   Entered:06/22/23 18:57:29    Desc: Attachment 38   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.9





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) being named and identified as a “qualified person” in connection with the following documents, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014, (B) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2014 and (C) the technical report entitled “43-101 Technical Report on Preliminary Economic Assessment of Shrinkage Mining of the West Reef Resource, Prestea Underground Mine, Ghana" effective date December 18, 2014 and filed on December 18, 2014, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, and Registration Statement No. 333-196906 on Form F-10, as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.











/s/ Martin Raffield


Martin Raffield


Senior Vice President, Technical Services





March 31, 2015
Exhibit 32.1

# Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of The RiceX Company (the Company), hereby certify, based on
my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ike E. Lynch Ike E. LynchMarch 30,
2005
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50962

Summary Calendar

 

JOAN GETZFRID,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CV-400

- - - - - - - - - -

June 24, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joan Getzfrid appeals from the district court’s decision in

favor of the Commissioner which denied disability and

supplemental security income benefits to her. Getzfrid argues

that the Commissioner’s decision is not supported by substantial

evidence and that the Commissioner failed to apply the proper

legal standards.

The Commissioner applied the proper legal standards in

denying benefits to Getzfrid. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 (1995);
No. 97-50962

-2-

Leggett v. Chater, 67 F.3d 558, 563 n.2 (5th Cir. 1995). 

Further, a review of the record reflects substantial evidence

supporting the Commissioner’s decision. See Ripley v. Chater, 67

F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir. 1995). Getzfrid is not entitled to a

remand because she submitted new evidence because she failed to

establish good cause for her failure to submit the evidence

earlier and the evidence does not relate back to the time period

for which the disability benefits were denied. See Leggett, 67

F.3d at 567. Therefore, Getzfrid failed to carry her burden of

proving a disability making her eligible for disability or

supplemental security income benefits. 42 U.S.C. § 423.

AFFIRMED.