alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
C. Burkhardt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

 /s/ William C. Burkhardt
-------------------------
William C. Burkhardt
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      -39-
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-00226-CV

____________________

ALBERT HADNOT SR., Appellant

V.

CHAD ADAMS, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 1A District Court

Jasper County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 35836 

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

Albert Hadnot Sr., appellant, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s

judgment. Appellant informed he Court of Appeals that he is indigent. On June 27, 

2018, we provided Hadnot with a copy of the form approved by the Supreme Court 

for purposes of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 and directed Hadnot to return a 

completed form with an inmate’s account statement. On July 23, 2018, appellant 

filed an inmate’s account statement and a statement of inability to pay costs that was 

prepared on the wrong form. 
2

We abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for a

determination of appellant’s ability to afford payment of court costs under Rule 145 

of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. The trial court may 

require appellant to use the required form statement. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(b), (d). 

Any motion to require appellant to pay costs or to require appellant to prove his

inability to afford costs must be filed in the trial court by the appropriate party in 

accordance with Rule 145. See id. R. 145(f)(1)-(4). If necessary, the trial court shall 

conduct a hearing and make appropriate orders. See id. R. 145(f)(5)-(7). Any

documents filed and orders signed pursuant to Rule 145 shall be forwarded to this

Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than August 28, 2018. 

Alternatively, a party, the trial court clerk, or the court reporter may file a status 

report informing this Court that additional time is needed for a determination under 

Rule 145. In the absence of a request for additional time, this appeal will 

automatically reinstate on August 28, 2018. Upon reinstatement, if an order 

requiring appellant to pay costs has not been signed, appellant will be entitled to 

proceed without payment of costs associated with this appeal. See id. R. 145(a).

ORDER ENTERED August 8, 2018.

 PER CURIAM

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Rights-Of-Way 

Avoidance Areas

Alternative D

0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Map 71

^_ Harl wton o

^_

Roundup

T7N

^_

§ ̈¦

Pompeys

 Pillar

T1

_^Big Timber

N

Billings^_

§ ̈¦

T2S

_^ Columbus § ̈¦

^_

Bridger

T8S

R18E R29E Montana R103W R93W Wyoming

T

57N

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Legend

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in May 2015

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Avoidance Areas

Interstate

Highway

Public Lands Survey System

^_ Towns

94

90

90
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and 

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any 

formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 16-BG-182

IN RE: RICHARD M. GUMMERE,

Respondent.

Bar Registration No. 421206 DDN: 34-16

BEFORE: Blackburne-Rigsby, Associate Judge, and Farrell and Nebeker, Senior 

Judges. 

ORDER

(FILED - May 12, 2016)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland 

disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction by consent, this 

court’s March 16, 2016, order directing respondent to show cause why the 

reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, the statement of 

respondent wherein he states he does not oppose the imposition of reciprocal 

discipline, and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal 

discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file an affidavit as 

required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is

ORDERED that Richard M. Gummere is hereby disbarred from the practice 

of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), 

and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of 

identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not 

participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s 

period of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit 

that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g). 

PER CURIAM

5/12/16
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 84 (Monday, May 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25410-25411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Agency Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
May 1, 2000.
    A closed meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 3, 2000 at 11 a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5

[[Page 25411]]

U.S.C. 552(c)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), (8), 
(9)(A) and (10), permit consideration for the scheduled matters at the 
closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled Wednesday, May 
3, 2000 will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and, Institution 
and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: April 26, 2000.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10836 Filed 4-26-00; 4:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 8101-01-M
Exhibit 32.1 SECTION 906 CEO CERTIFICATION Form of Certification Pursuant to
Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code I, Marvin R.
Richardson, Chief Executive Officer of Arcadia Resources, Inc., certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Arcadia
Resources, Inc. /s/
Marvin R. Richardson 
Marvin R. Richardson 
Chief Executive Officer Dated: February 9, 2011 A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Arcadia Resources,
Inc. The statement will be retained by Arcadia Resources, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et 

al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17 BK 3283 (LTS)

(Jointly Administered)

Re: ECF No. 4103

INFORMATIVE MOTION REGARDING ATTENDANCE 

AT THE NOVEMBER 7-8, 2018 OMNIBUS HEARING

To the Honorable United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain:

The Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority (“AAFAF”) through 

their undersigned counsel, hereby state and pray as follows. 

1. The undersigned, appearing in these proceedings on behalf of AAFAF, hereby 

respectfully submit this informative motion in response to the Court’s order entered on October 

26, 2018 [ECF No. 4103] regarding the November 7-8, 2018 omnibus hearing.

2. Luis C. Marini-Biaggi and Carolina Velaz-Rivero of Marini Pietrantoni Muñiz

LLC, will appear in the San Juan courtroom and seek to be heard in connection with the following: 

 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last four (4) 

digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers 

due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4149 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 16:33:00 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
(i) Motion for Lift of Stay Seeking the Modification of the Automatic Stay to Enforce 

Liens on Employee Withholding Funds Currently Held by the Employee Retirement 

System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico [ECF No. 4011]

(ii) Any replies or responses filed in relation to the Motion for Lift of Stay [ECF No. 

4011].

3. AAFAF reserves the right to supplement this informative motion to the extent that 

the Court schedules additional matters for the November 7-8 omnibus hearing. 

Dated: November 1, 2018

San Juan, Puerto Rico

/s/ Luis C. Marini-Biaggi

Luis C. Marini-Biaggi

USDC No. 222301 

/s/ Carolina Velaz-Rivero

Carolina Velaz-Rivero

USDC No. 300913

MARINI PIETRANTONI MUÑIZ LLC

MCS Plaza, Suite 500

255 Ponce de León Ave.

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00917

Tel: (787) 705-2171

Fax: (787) 936-7494

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4149 Filed:11/01/18 Entered:11/01/18 16:33:00 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.2 Falsification of applications, reports, or records. ( a ) A person may not make or cause to be made— ( 1 ) Any fraudulent, intentionally false, or misleading statement on any application for a certificate or approval under this part;
( 2 ) Any fraudulent, intentionally false, or misleading statement in any record or report that is kept, made, or used to show compliance with any requirement of this part;
( 3 ) Any reproduction for a fraudulent purpose of any certificate or approval issued under this part.
( 4 ) Any alteration of any certificate or approval issued under this part.
( b ) The commission by any person of an act prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section is a basis for— ( 1 ) Denying issuance of any certificate or approval under this part; and
( 2 ) Suspending or revoking any certificate or approval issued under this part and held by that person.
[Doc. No. 23345, 57 FR 41367, Sept. 9, 1992, as amended by Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009; Amdt. 21-92A, 75 FR 9095, Mar. 1, 2010]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Tex as

January 26, 2017

No. 04

- 15

- 00630

- CR

Troy Stanley STAIR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 0709

- CR

- B

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

State ’ s motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. T h e State ’ s brief is due

on February 20, 2017.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of January, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 171.251 Scope.

This subpart sets forth minimum requirements for the approval and operation of non-Federal Interim Standard Microwave Landing System (ISMLS) facilities that are to be involved in the approval of instrument flight rules and air traffic control procedures related to those facilities.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1074

In Re: PETER KAY STERN,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (No. CA-96-183)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 20, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter Kay Stern, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 See In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).

2 See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 309

(1989).

3 See In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.

1979).

2

PER CURIAM:

Peter Stern filed a mandamus petition in this court after the

magistrate judge recommended that Stern's civil rights action in

the Western District of North Carolina be dismissed. Instead of

filing objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation with the district court, Stern seeks a writ of mandamus to

compel the clerk of the Western District of North Carolina to enter

a default judgment against the Defendants.

The granting of the writ is a drastic remedy and should only

be granted in extraordinary situations.1 Stern must show that he

has no other avenue for relief and that his right to relief is

clear and undisputable.2 Stern fails to meet his burden, and

mandamus relief cannot be used as a substitute for appeal. 3

Accordingly, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15
                                        
                      Independent Auditors' Review Report
                                        

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The Centris Group, Inc.:

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of The Centris Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999, and the related condensed
consolidated income statements and statements of cash flows for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 1999 and 1998.  These condensed consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for
them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of The Centris Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated income
statement, and statements of stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year
then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 26, 1999, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In
our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1998, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it
has been derived.

                                              /S/ KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, California
May 14,1999
Editorial Note on Part 183
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 183.1 Scope. This part describes the requirements for designating private persons to act as representatives of the Administrator in examining, inspecting, and testing persons and aircraft for the purpose of issuing airman, operating, and aircraft certificates. In addition, this part states the privileges of those representatives and prescribes rules for the exercising of those privileges, as follows: ( a ) An individual may be designated as a representative of the Administrator under subparts B or C of this part.
( b ) An organization may be designated as a representative of the Administrator by obtaining an Organization Designation Authorization under subpart D of this part.
[Doc. No. FAA-2003-16685, 70 FR 59946, Oct. 13, 2005]
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**§
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
      Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
      the period ending April 30, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Ryan, Chief
      Executive Officer, President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/Christopher
      J. Ryan


Christopher
      J. Ryan


Chief
      Executive Officer, President, Secretary


and
      General Counsel





June
      8,
      2006






23
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

#### § 21.95 Approval of minor changes in type design.

Minor changes in a type design may be approved under a method acceptable to the FAA before submitting to the FAA any substantiating or descriptive data.
#### § 247.1 Official mileage record of the Department of Transportation.

The direct airport-to-airport mileage record now maintained, and as hereafter amended or revised from time to time by the Office of Airline Information of the Bureau of Transportation Statistics of the Department of Transportation in the regular performance of its duties, is hereby adopted as the official mileage record of the Department and the mileages set forth therein shall be used in all instances where it shall be necessary to determine direct airport-to-airport mileages pursuant to the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII (Transportation)or any rule, regulation, or order of the Department pursuant thereto.

[Amdt. 247-2, 56 FR 67170, Dec. 30, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 66725, Dec. 26, 1995; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15932, Apr. 16, 2019]
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended annual report of RECOV Energy, Corp.. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard J. Verdiramo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Date:  September 30
, 2005

By: /s/ Richard J. Verdiramo

------------------------------------

Richard J. Verdiramo, President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer