alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B)
        OF
        SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)
 
 Pursuant
        to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
        of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
        undersigned officers of Unit Corporation a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
        does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
 
 The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Form
        10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
        the
        Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and
        results of operations of the Company as of June 30, 2006 and December 31,
        2005
        and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and
        2005.
 
 
 Dated:
        August 8, 2006
 
 By: /s/
        Larry D. Pinkston
 Larry
        D.
        Pinkston
 Chief
        Executive Officer and
 Director
 
 
 Dated:
        August 8, 2006
 
 By: /s/
        David T. Merrill
 David
        T.
        Merrill
 Chief
        Financial Officer and
 Treasurer
 
 
 The
        foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906
        of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
        63
        of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
        10-Q
        or as a separate disclosure document.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 has been provided to Unit Corporation and will be retained by
        Unit
        Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
        staff
        on request.
§ 25.181 Dynamic stability. ( a ) Any short period oscillation, not including combined lateral-directional oscillations, occurring between 1.13 VSR and maximum allowable speed appropriate to the configuration of the airplane must be heavily damped with the primary controls— ( 1 ) Free; and
( 2 ) In a fixed position.
( b ) Any combined lateral-directional oscillations (“Dutch roll”) occurring between 1.13 VSR and maximum allowable speed appropriate to the configuration of the airplane must be positively damped with controls free, and must be controllable with normal use of the primary controls without requiring exceptional pilot skill.
[Amdt. 25-42, 43 FR 2322, Jan. 16, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29775, July 20, 1990; 55 FR 37607, Sept. 12, 1990; Amdt. 25-108, 67 FR 70827, Nov. 26, 2002]
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.6    
  


TANNING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION CHANGE IN CONTROL PLAN

NOTICE OF PARTICIPATION  


        This Notice of Participation Agreement ("Notice of Participation") is entered into this 21st Day of March 2003 by and between Tanning Technology
Corporation, a Delaware Corporation ("Tanning") and Adesh Gupta ("Participant"). The Notice of Participation is subject to and governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Change in Control
Plan ("Plan") adopted by the Tanning Board of Directors on March 18, 2003. 


COMPENSATION UPON TERMINATION  


        Upon a termination of your employment as set forth in Article IV, Section 1, of the Plan, you shall be entitled to the following benefits: 



Severance payment: Subject to the provisions of the Plan, a severance payment equal to 10 months of your Base Compensation (as defined in the
Plan). Severance shall be payable as set forth in the Plan. 


Continuation of Medical Coverage under COBRA: If you elect to participate in COBRA benefits continuation, the Company shall pay or shall reimburse you
(to the extent you have previously made payments), to the extent COBRA benefits are available, your monthly premiums for your elected level of group medical insurance for up to 10 months of
continued coverage of your then-currently elected level of benefit. 




Agreed
and accepted: 



	
Tanning Technology Corporation	
 	

Participant
	

By:	
 	

Gregory A. Conley	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ Adesh K. Gupta
	 	 	
	 	 	 	

	 	 	Signature	 	 	 	Signature
	

 	
 	

Gregory A. Conley	
 	

 	
 	

Adesh Gupta
	
	 	

	 	 	Printed Name	 	 	 	Printed Name
	

 	
 	

President, CEO & COO	
 	

 	
 	

March 21, 2003
	
	 	

	 	 	Title	 	 	 	Date
	

 	
 	

March 31, 2003	
 	

 	
 	

 
	
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Date	 	 	 	 














QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.6
§ 25.1445 Equipment standards for the oxygen distributing system. ( a ) When oxygen is supplied to both crew and passengers, the distribution system must be designed for either— ( 1 ) A source of supply for the flight crew on duty and a separate source for the passengers and other crewmembers; or
( 2 ) A common source of supply with means to separately reserve the minimum supply required by the flight crew on duty.
( b ) Portable walk-around oxygen units of the continuous flow, diluter-demand, and straight demand kinds may be used to meet the crew or passenger breathing requirements.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Satellite Power Systems (SPS) laser studies
 
v 1| v2
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:3346-7
Item Number:0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000971401
November 9, 2018
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The CNO Executive Panel is to conduct the final briefing of the Navy Energy Strategy Short Study to the Chief of Naval Operations. This meeting will consist of discussions relating to proposed Navy Energy Strategy. 

# DATE:

The meeting will be held on May 31, 2000 from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the office of the Chief of Naval Operations, 2000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Commander Christopher Agan, CNO Executive Panel, 4401 Ford Avenue, Suite 601, Alexandria, Virginia 22302-0268, (703) 681-6205. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), these matters constitute classified information that is specifically authorized by Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense and are, in fact, properly classified pursuant to such Executive Order. Accordingly, the Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing that the public interest requires that all sessions of the meeting be closed to the public because they will be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(1) of title 5, United States Code. 

Dated: April 27, 2000. 

J.L. Roth, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, Federal Register Liaison Officer.   

[FR Doc. 00-11506 Filed 5-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
EX-31.1

                          Sarbanes-Oxley Certification

I, Gary K. Bettin, a Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A., certify
that:

1.    I have reviewed the annual reports on Form 10-K for the calendar year 2003
      and all monthly current reports on Form 8-K containing a copy of the
      monthly statement to certificateholders (the "Distribution Date
      Statements") delivered pursuant to Section 4.03(b) of the Pooling and
      Servicing Agreements listed on Exhibit I hereto (each, an "Agreement")
      filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by such annual
      reports of the trusts (each, a "Trust") formed pursuant to such
      Agreements;

2.    Based on my knowledge, with respects to each Trust, the information in
      these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by such
      annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
      to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under each Agreement for
      inclusion in the related Trust's Distribution Date Statements is included
      in these reports;

4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
      under each Agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
      review required under each Agreement, and except as disclosed in the
      reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under each Agreement;

5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
      servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards, based upon the
      report provided by an independent public accountant after conducting a
      review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
      Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure as set forth in the Agreement that
      is included in these reports; and

6.    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche
      Bank National Trust Company of California.

Date: March 30, 2004

/s/ Gary K. Bettin
---------------------------
Signature

Senior Vice President
Title

<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT I

PARTIES                             DATE OF POOLING                  SERIES
                                      AGREEMENT

Bank of America Mortgage             April 1, 1998                   1998-1
Securities, Inc., Bank
of America, N.A. and Deutsche
Bank National Trust Company
of California

Bank of America Mortgage             May 1, 1998                     1998-2
Securities, Inc., Bank
of America, N.A. and Deutsche
Bank National Trust Company
of California
§ 27.399 Dual control system. Each dual primary flight control system must be designed to withstand the loads that result when pilot forces of 0.75 times those obtained under § 27.395 are applied— ( a ) In opposition; and
( b ) In the same direction.
Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2017 (the Report) by CGI Group Inc. (the Company), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 21, 2017



/s/ François BoulangerFrançois BoulangerExecutive Vice-President andChief Financial Officer
#### § 29.181 Dynamic stability: Category A rotorcraft.

Any short-period oscillation occurring at any speed from VY to VNE must be positively damped with the primary flight controls free and in a fixed position.

[Amdt. 29-24, 49 FR 44437, Nov. 6, 1984]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Clinical Center; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Governors of the Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Board of Governors of the Warren Grant 
Magnuson Clinical Center.
    Date: June 5, 2000.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: For discussion of planning and operational issues.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center Medical 
Board Room, 2C116, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Maureen E. Gormley, Executive Secretary, Warren 
Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 
Building 10, Room 2C146, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/496-2897.


    Dated: April 19, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-10404 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael E. Roach, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of CGI Group Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuers other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 23, 2013



/s/ Michael E. RoachMichael E. RoachPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
**Title:**Geologic reconnaissance of a  proposed powersite on the Maksoutof  River near Sitka, southeastern Alaska
SuDoc Number: I 19.3:1211-F
Item  Number: 0620 (online)
CGP System  Number:000973886

Report  | Plate  1
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Publishing Office.

 

Last updated:  September 14,  2017  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
  |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00112-CR

TAYTON SETH FINLEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 5

of Tarrant County (1607688)

September 22, 2022

Opinion by Justice Walker

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:322 Filed:06/13/17 Entered:06/13/17 17:38:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:322 Filed:06/13/17 Entered:06/13/17 17:38:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:322 Filed:06/13/17 Entered:06/13/17 17:38:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
Date: April 16, 2015

To: Docket, EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0738

From: Andrew Bouchard

Subject: Meeting Record for April 16, 2015 Meeting Between the U.S. EPA and The Dow 

Chemical Company

On April 16, 2015, representatives of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

participated in a conference call with The Dow Chemical Company. The purpose of the call was 

to discuss Dow’s comments that were submitted to the docket on the initial MPGF AMEL 

notice. See Attachment 1 for the names and affiliations of the meeting participants.
Attachment 1

Participants in April 16, 2015 EPA/Dow Meeting

The Dow Chemical Company Representatives

Russell Wozniak

Jarod Davis

Vance Varner

Cheryl Steves

U.S. EPA Representatives

Andrew Bouchard

Brenda Shine
§ 29.563 Structural ditching provisions. If certification with ditching provisions is requested, structural strength for ditching must meet the requirements of this section and § 29.801(e). ( a ) *Forward speed landing conditions.* The rotorcraft must initially contact the most critical wave for reasonably probable water conditions at forward velocities from zero up to 30 knots in likely pitch, roll, and yaw attitudes. The rotorcraft limit vertical descent velocity may not be less than 5 feet per second relative to the mean water surface. Rotor lift may be used to act through the center of gravity throughout the landing impact. This lift may not exceed two-thirds of the design maximum weight. A maximum forward velocity of less than 30 knots may be used in design if it can be demonstrated that the forward velocity selected would not be exceeded in a normal one-engine-out touchdown.
( b ) *Auxiliary or emergency float conditions* — ( 1 ) *Floats fixed or deployed before initial water contact.* In addition to the landing loads in paragraph (a) of this section, each auxiliary or emergency float, or its support and attaching structure in the airframe or fuselage, must be designed for the load developed by a fully immersed float unless it can be shown that full immersion is unlikely. If full immersion is unlikely, the highest likely float buoyancy load must be applied. The highest likely buoyancy load must include consideration of a partially immersed float creating restoring moments to compensate the upsetting moments caused by side wind, unsymmetrical rotorcraft loading, water wave action, rotorcraft inertia, and probable structural damage and leakage considered under § 29.801(d). Maximum roll and pitch angles determined from compliance with § 29.801(d) may be used, if significant, to determine the extent of immersion of each float. If the floats are deployed in flight, appropriate air loads derived from the flight limitations with the floats deployed shall be used in substantiation of the floats and their attachment to the rotorcraft. For this purpose, the design airspeed for limit load is the float deployed airspeed operating limit multiplied by 1.11.
( 2 ) *Floats deployed after initial water contact.* Each float must be designed for full or partial immersion prescribed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. In addition, each float must be designed for combined vertical and drag loads using a relative limit speed of 20 knots between the rotorcraft and the water. The vertical load may not be less than the highest likely buoyancy load determined under paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
[Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 8003, Mar. 6, 1990]