alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 16.235 Argument before the hearing officer. ( a ) *Argument during the hearing.* During the hearing, the hearing officer shall give the parties reasonable opportunity to present oral argument on the record supporting or opposing motions, objections, and rulings if the parties request an opportunity for argument. The hearing officer may direct written argument during the hearing if the hearing officer finds that submission of written arguments would not delay the hearing.
( b ) *Posthearing briefs.* The hearing officer may request or permit the parties to submit posthearing briefs. The hearing officer may provide for the filing of simultaneous reply briefs as well, if such filing will not unduly delay the issuance of the hearing officer's initial decision. Posthearing briefs shall include proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law; exceptions to rulings of the hearing officer; references to the record in support of the findings of fact; and supporting arguments for the proposed findings, proposed conclusions, and exceptions.
[Doc. No. 27783, 61 FR 54004, Oct. 16, 1996, as amended at Amdt. 16-1, 78 FR 56147, Sept. 12, 2013]
§ 141.23 Advertising limitations. ( a ) The holder of a pilot school certificate or a provisional pilot school certificate may not make any statement relating to its certification and ratings that is false or designed to mislead any person contemplating enrollment in that school.
( b ) The holder of a pilot school certificate or a provisional pilot school certificate may not advertise that the school is certificated unless it clearly differentiates between courses that have been approved under part 141 of this chapter and those that have not been approved under part 141 of this chapter.
( c ) The holder of a pilot school certificate or a provisional pilot school certificate must promptly remove: ( 1 ) From vacated premises, all signs indicating that the school was certificated by the Administrator; or
( 2 ) All indications (including signs), wherever located, that the school is certificated by the Administrator when its certificate has expired or has been surrendered, suspended, or revoked.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements Nos. 333-105195 and 333-12160 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements
Nos. 333-57091, 333-72456, 333-72458, 333-72460, 333-112761 and 333-134295 on
Form S-8 of our reports dated February 28, 2007, relating to the financial statements
of OMI Corporation and managements report on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of OMI Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPNew York, New YorkFebruary 28, 2007

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO

 as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.,

Debtors.

1

 PROMESA

 Title III

 No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

 (Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICE

To the Honorable United States District Court Judge Laura Taylor Swain:

COMES NOW, the undersigned counsel, and respectfully sets forth as follows:

1. Creditor and/or party in interest COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CREDITO 

EL VALENCIANO has retained the services of the undersigned’s law firm to represent it in the 

instant case.

2. Therefore, the undersigned respectfully requests that all pleadings, orders, notices, 

and documents filed and entered in this case be notified upon the undersigned counsel.

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested from this Honorable Court to enter an order 

for all notices, pleadings, orders and documents filed in this case to be sent to the undersigned..

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this date, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all 

CM/ECF participants. 

 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last four (4) 

digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are 9i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283- LTS) (Last Four Digits of federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales tax 

Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3000 Filed:05/02/18 Entered:05/02/18 17:56:30 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. 

In San Juan, Puerto Rico this 2nd day of May, 2018.

ALMEIDA & DÁVILA, P.S.C.

PO Box 191757

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00919-1757

Phone: (787) 722-2500

Fax: (787) 777-1376

/S/ ENRIQUE M. ALMEIDA BERNAL

USDC-PR 217701

Email: ealmeida@almeidadavila.com

/S/ ZELMA DÁVILA CARRASQUILLO

USDC-PR 218913

Email: zdavila@almeidadavila.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3000 Filed:05/02/18 Entered:05/02/18 17:56:30 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 25.945 Thrust or power augmentation system. ( a ) *General.* Each fluid injection system must provide a flow of fluid at the rate and pressure established for proper engine functioning under each intended operating condition. If the fluid can freeze, fluid freezing may not damage the airplane or adversely affect airplane performance.
( b ) *Fluid tanks.* Each augmentation system fluid tank must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Each tank must be able to withstand without failure the vibration, inertia, fluid, and structural loads that it may be subject to in operation.
( 2 ) The tanks as mounted in the airplane must be able to withstand without failure or leakage an internal pressure 1.5 times the maximum operating pressure.
( 3 ) If a vent is provided, the venting must be effective under all normal flight conditions.
( 4 ) [Reserved]
( 5 ) Each tank must have an expansion space of not less than 2 percent of the tank capacity. It must be impossible to fill the expansion space inadvertently with the airplane in the normal ground attitude.
( c ) Augmentation system drains must be designed and located in accordance with § 25.1455 if— ( 1 ) The augmentation system fluid is subject to freezing; and
( 2 ) The fluid may be drained in flight or during ground operation.
( d ) The augmentation liquid tank capacity available for the use of each engine must be large enough to allow operation of the airplane under the approved procedures for the use of liquid-augmented power. The computation of liquid consumption must be based on the maximum approved rate appropriate for the desired engine output and must include the effect of temperature on engine performance as well as any other factors that might vary the amount of liquid required.
( e ) This section does not apply to fuel injection systems.
[Amdt. 25-40, 42 FR 15043, Mar. 17, 1977, as amended by Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29785, July 20, 1990; Amdt. 25-115, 69 FR 40527, July 2, 2004]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA—03151]

                    In accordance with Section 250(A), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Department of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on June 25, 1999, applicable to workers of Homemaker Industries, Inc. located in North Charleston, South Carolina. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 20, 1999 (64 FR 38922).                

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of braided rugs. New information received from the company shows that on April 17, 2000, A and M, Inc. purchased Homemaker Industries, Inc. and became known as A and M Inc., d/b/a Homemaker. Information also shows that workers separated from employment at Homemaker Industries, Inc. had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for A and M, Inc., d/b/a Homemaker.

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter.

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Homemaker Industries, Inc. who were adversely affected by the shift of production to Mexico.

The amended notice applicable to NAFTA—03151 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of A and M, Inc., d/b/a Homemaker, North Charleston, South Carolina who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 4, 1998 through June 25, 2001 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 27th day of April, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-11118  Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.210 Suspension of tariffs. ( a ) A fare, charge, rule or other tariff provision that is suspended by the Department pursuant to section 41509 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII shall be noted by the Department in the Government Filing File and the Historical File.
( b ) When the Department vacates a tariff suspension, in full or in part, and after notification of the carrier by the Department, such event shall be noted by the carrier in the Government Filing File and the Historical File.
( c ) When a tariff suspension is vacated or when the tariff becomes effective upon termination of the suspension period, the carrier or its agent shall refile the tariff showing the effective date.
Exhibit
10.29


[Rigel Letterhead]


 


March 5, 2003


 


Donald G. Payan


1180 Veterans Boulevard


South San
Francisco, CA  94040


	
  REF:

  	
   

  	
  AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT
  EFFECTIVE DATE

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  JANUARY 16, 1997.

  



 


Dear Don,


This is a letter
agreement amending the Employment Agreement between you, Donald G. Payan, and
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (Dr. Payan and Rigel respectively, and
collectively “both Parties”) dated January 16, 1997 (the 1997 Agreement).


Wherein both
parties wish to amend the 1997 Agreement; and


Therefore, for
good and valuable consideration as discussed herein it is agreed upon by both
Parties as indicated by the signatures below that the 1997 Agreement will be
amended as follows:


On Page 2,
paragraph 4, line 6, “Effective Date” shall be replaced with “Date of
Termination”.


All remainder of
the 1997 Agreement shall remain intact and in full force.


It is so agreed
upon by both parties.


 


	
  /s/ James M. Gower

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Donald G. Payan

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  James M. Gower

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Donald G. Payan

  
	
  Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 29
East
fo}
NWYSE Elevation, in feet
Sec. 14, T. 285, R, 26, ir
© 900 1800 com
7 E
NWSE
Sec. 15, T. 28S., R. 26E.
4
©-900°¢pm
West 2 ‘See: 25, T.-28'S., Ri 25iE. a
SEVNE% yo
| Sec. 21, T. 285., R. 25. 3 9-200 vm os L140
o
NEYNEY © 900 1800 cpm NEYSE% 58
Sec. 20, T. 28S. R. 25 E z Sec. 22, T. 28 S., R. 25 E._ in
— a
0 __900 cpr
EXPLANATION
Lithologic symbols
+120
Sond =
Organic material
Iron cementation or
staining; "hardpan
s
§
3 ; 100
Clay 3 2
s
a
= or
Phosphate nodules 58
a>
eae g
Chert fragments =
Calcareous clay
ES r
Limestone
No recovery, core lost
A mixture of symbols indicates - g
o mixed litholo 2 sl
ay Surface 20 e238
Other symbols FGE
en £e8
Lithologic correlation c=u | 60
ww &
ta?
a 3508
Limits of aluminum and Scale,in feet 26
calcium phosphate zones 0 é
= ss 5
Alternating symbols indicate two or
three of the above correlations MIDDLE MIOCENE
follow the same line 5 Howthorn formation
w
y 10 Ze
Section of core from which fossils os L406
were identified r{| = Se
a a
94 Trace of gamma-ray log showing we
ws intensity of radiation; cpm: 5 5
Sample number and interval sampled counts per minute 20 a

Holes |,2, and 3 from lot 2546
Holes 4 and 8 from lot 2547.
Hole 7 not sampled

CROSS SECTION 14, LAND-PEBBLE PHOSPHATE DISTRICT, FLORIDA

466352 0 ~ 59 (In pocket)
Editorial Note on Part 183
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 183.67 Transferability and duration. ( a ) An ODA is effective until the date shown on the Letter of Designation, unless sooner terminated by the Administrator.
( b ) No ODA may be transferred at any time.
( c ) The Administrator may terminate or temporarily suspend an ODA for any reason, including that the ODA Holder: ( 1 ) Has requested in writing that the authorization be suspended or terminated;
( 2 ) Has not properly performed its duties;
( 3 ) Is no longer needed; or
( 4 ) No longer meets the qualifications required to perform authorized functions.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10968]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Office of Communications; Cancellation of a Standard Form

AGENCY: General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State is cancelling the following Standard 
Form because of low usage: OF 263, Requisition for Equipment, Supplies, 
Furniture, Etc.

DATES: Effective May 3, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Barbara Williams, General Services 
Administration, (202) 501-0581.

    Dated: April 14, 2000.
Barbara M. Williams,
Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10968 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 

23, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00705-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.A., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 257th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-50346 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 22, 2018. On August 16, 2018, 

appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion 

is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. 

 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Busby.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BULMARCK CRUZ

- PALMA,

Petitioner,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 16

- 71350 Agency No. A205

- 711

- 526

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 15, 2022 * *
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Bulmarck Cruz

- Palma , a native and citizen of Mexico , petitions for review
of the Board of Immi gration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal , and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”)

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 23 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 16

- 71350

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in
part the petition for review.
We reject as unsupported by the record Cruz

- Palma’s contention that he exhausted the merits of his asylum claim, where the record demonstrates that, in
his counseled appeal brief to the BIA, the only issue raised as to asylum was the
concession that the record did not demonstrate an exception to the one

- year filing deadline. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review Cruz

- Palma’s contentions as to
the merits of his asylum claim because he failed to raise them to the BIA

. S ee Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 67 7

- 7 8 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not presented to the agency). In his opening brief, Cruz

- Palma does not challenge the agency’s dispositive
internal relocation determination as to withholding of removal , and also does not challenge the agency’s denial of CAT relief

. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s ope ning brief are waived). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to
Cruz

- Palma’s withholding of removal and CAT claims. In light of this disposition, we do not reach Cruz

- Palma’s contentions as to his membership in a cognizable particular social group. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts are not required to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach).3 16

- 71350

Cruz

- Palma also does not challenge the BIA’s conclusion that the IJ did not violate his right to due process. See Lopez

- Vasquez , 706 F.3d at 1079

- 80

. The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the
mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part
.
From:     "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>                                                                                         

To:    Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tom Walton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA                                                             

Cc:     Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA                                                         

Date:    08/05/2010 07:16 PM                                                                                                                      

Subject:    Plant language / High mercury facilities                                                                                                 

Hi Tom,

Here is our proposed language related to the Durkee plant and the high mercury facilities – please let

me know if you have any questions or comments:

Suggested for the RIA; should be in Chapter 3, preferably around Table 3‐11 where social costs are

summarized.

“EPA notes that since conducting this analysis, one high mercury‐emitting plant has invested in control

technology estimated to reduce emissions by approximately 85 percent.  The current analysis does not

include these actual costs in the baseline but rather estimates aggregate compliance costs based on  

the averaging methodologies applied to all other modeled plants.  In addition, because this investment

occurred after the analysis was conducted, the baseline benefits likewise do not include the

approximately 85% emissions reduction.

Finally, EPA did not estimate the change in social costs that would occur if the 2 high mercury‐emitting

plants were to shut down. “
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 26, 2024

No. 04

- 23

- 00428

- CR

EX PARTE Carlos Fabian BERNAL VAZQUEZ

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11176CR

Honorable Susan D. Reed , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS Carlos Fabian Bernal Vazquez’s appeal of the denial of his application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. We further consider Bernal Vazquez’s appeal as a petition f or writ of mandamus and

DENY his request for mandamus relief WITHOUT PREJUDICE

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on June 26, 2024

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez

, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of June, 2024

.

_____________________________ Luz Estrada , Chief Deputy Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1106]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 at 2:00 P.M. (Eastern Time).

PLACE: Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 
1801 ``L'' Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20507.

STATUS: The meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Closed Session

    Review of Pending Litigation.

    Note: Any matter not discussed or concluded may be carried over 
to a later meeting: (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC 
Commission meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also 
provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future 
Commission sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTD) at 
any time for information on these meetings.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Frances M. Hart, Executive Officer 
on (202) 663-4070.

    This Notice Issued January 12, 2000.
Frances M. Hart,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 00-1106 Filed 1-12-00; 2:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 6750-06-M