alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated March 8, 2004, exceptwith respect to the matters described in the fifth paragraph of the report, as to which the date is October 8, 2004, with respect to the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity (deficit)and cash flows of Global Crossing Limited and subsidiaries (the “Company”), for the period from December 10, 2003 to December 31, 2003 (Successor Company operations) and for the period from January 1, 2003 toDecember 9, 2003 (Predecessor Company operations) and the related financial statement schedule appearing in the Annual Report of Global Crossing Limited on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Global Crossing Limited on Form S-8 (File No. 333-121079, effective December 8, 2004 and File No. 333-125281, effective May 26, 2005). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

New York, New York 

March 15, 2006
Editorial Note on Part 183
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 183.15 Duration of certificates. ( a ) Unless sooner terminated under paragraph (b) of this section, a designation as an Aviation Medical Examiner or as a Flight Standards or Aircraft Certification Service Designated Representative as described in §§ 183.21, 183.23, 183.25, 183.27, 183.29, 183.31, or 183.33 is effective until the expiration date shown on the document granting the authorization.
( b ) A designation made under this subpart terminates: ( 1 ) Upon the written request of the representative;
( 2 ) Upon the written request of the employer in any case in which the recommendation of the employer is required for the designation;
( 3 ) Upon the representative being separated from the employment of the employer who recommended him or her for certification;
( 4 ) Upon a finding by the Administrator that the representative has not properly performed his or her duties under the designation;
( 5 ) Upon the assistance of the representative being no longer needed by the Administrator; or
( 6 ) For any reason the Administrator considers appropriate.
[Doc. No. FAA-2007-27812, 73 FR 43066, July 24, 2008]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [REG-111119-99] 
          - RIN 1545-AX32 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking. 

# SUMMARY:

This document cancels the public hearing on proposed regulations on the tax consequences of partnership mergers and divisions. 

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for Thursday, May 4, 2000, at 10 a.m., is cancelled. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

LaNita Van Dyke of the Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-7190 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Tuesday, January 11, 2000 (65 FR 1572), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for Thursday, May 4, 2000, at 10 a.m., in room 2615, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is proposed regulations under section 708 of the Internal Revenue Code. The public comment period for these proposed regulations expired on Monday, April 10, 2000. The outlines of topics to be addressed at the hearing were due on Thursday, April 13, 2000.                 

The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Friday, April 21, 2000, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for Thursday, May 4, 2000, is cancelled. 

Cynthia Grigsby, 

Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate). 

[FR Doc. 00-10524 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7201

DARNELL COLEMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Chief Warden Greensville

Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-02-431)

Submitted: June 11, 2003 Decided: June 25, 2003

Before LUTTIG, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darnell Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Darnell Coleman seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing as untimely filed his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas

corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When,

as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on

procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue

unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of

reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid

claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district

court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). After considering our

recent decision in Wade v. Robinson, 327 F.3d 328 (4th Cir. 2003),

and independently reviewing the record, we conclude that Coleman

has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123

S. Ct. 1029, 1039 (2003). Accordingly, we deny Coleman’s motion

for appointment of counsel, deny his motion for a certificate of

appealability, and dismiss the appeal.
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

______________________________________________ 

In re: ) 

 ) PROMESA 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND ) Title III 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, ) 

 ) 

 as representative of ) 

 ) 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., ) No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

 ) (Jointly Administered) 

 Debtors. ) 

In re: ) 

 ) PROMESA 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND ) Title III 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, ) 

 ) 

 as representative of ) 

 ) 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, ) No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

 ) 

PUERTO RICO HIGHWAYS & ) No. 17 BK 3567-LTS 

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, ) (This Filing Relates to 

 ) These Debtors) 

 Debtor. ) 

PEAJE INVESTMENTS LLC’S INFORMATIVE MOTION AND NOTICE OF 

REQUEST TO BE HEARD AT THE JUNE 6-7, 2018 OMNIBUS HEARING 

The undersigned, counsel to Peaje Investments LLC (“Peaje”), the plaintiff in Adv. Proc. 

Nos. 17-BK-151-LTS and 17-BK-152-LTS and a party-in-interest in the above-captioned Title 

III cases, hereby submits this Informative Motion in response to the Court’s May 16 Order (see 

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS, [Dkt. No. 3075]) (the “Order”) concerning attendance at the June 6-

7 Omnibus Hearing (the “Hearing”). 

Pursuant to the Order, the undersigned counsel hereby informs the Court that Dora L. 

Monserrate Peñagarícano and/or Richard J. Schell of the firm Monserrate Simonet & Gierbolini, 

LLC will attend the Hearing in the San Juan courtroom and reserve the right to present argument 

with respect to any agenda item and respond as necessary to any statements made by any party 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3198 Filed:05/31/18 Entered:05/31/18 10:37:56 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
which implicate Peaje’s interests. In addition, Allan S. Brilliant and/or G. Eric Brunstad, Jr. of 

Dechert LLP reserve the right to attend the Hearing in the New York courtroom and present 

argument with respect to any agenda item and respond as necessary to any statements made by 

any party which implicate Peaje’s interests. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this 31 day of May, 2018. 

MONSERRATE SIMONET & 

GIERBOLINI, LLC 

Dora L. Monserrate Peñagarícano 

USDC-PR No. 212612 

101 San Patricio Avenue 

Maramar Plaza, Suite 1120 

Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 

Phone: (787) 620-5300 

Fax: (787) 620-5305 

DECHERT LLP 

/s/ Allan S. Brilliant _

Allan S. Brilliant (pro hac vice)

G. Eric Brunstad, Jr. (pro hac vice) 

Andrew C. Harmeyer (pro hac vice) 

1095 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Attorneys for Peaje Investments LLC 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3198 Filed:05/31/18 Entered:05/31/18 10:37:56 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 31 day of May 2018, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System, which will send notification to 

all counsel of record of such filing. 

Dated: May 31, 2018 

/s/ Brett Stone _

By: Brett Stone 

Title: Paralegal, Dechert LLP 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3198 Filed:05/31/18 Entered:05/31/18 10:37:56 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 88 (Friday, May 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11193]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Threat Reduction Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics).

ACTION:  Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Threat Reduction Advisory Committee will meet in closed 
session on Wednesday, July 12, 2000 at the Pentagon.
    The mission of the Committee is to advise the Under Secretary of 
Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics) on technology 
security, counterproliferation, chemical and biological defense, 
sustainment of the nuclear weapons stockpile, and other matters related 
to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's mission.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix II, (1994)), it 
has been determined that this Committee meeting concerns matters listed 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly the meeting will be 
closed to the public.

DATES: Wednesday, July 12, 2000, (8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.)

ADDRESSES: Room 3E869, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Contact Ms. Eileen Giglio, Defense 
Threat Reduction Agency/AS, 45045 Aviation Drive, Dulles, Va 20166-
7517. Phone: (703) 326-8789.

    Dated: April 25, 2000.
Patricia L. Toppings
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-11193 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Public notice is hereby given that all outstanding 8                    1/4                     percent Treasury Bonds of 200-5 (CUSIP No. 912810 BU 1) dated May 15, 1975, due May 15, 2005, are hereby called for redemption at par on May 15, 2000, on which date interest on such bonds will cease.                

2. Full information regarding the presentation and surrender of such bonds held in coupon and registered form for redemption under this call will be found in Department of the Treasury Circular No. 3000 dated March 4, 1973, as amended (31 CFR part 306), and on the Bureau of the Public Debt's website, www.publicdebt.treas.gov.

3. Redemption payments for such bonds held in book-entry form, whether on the books of the Federal Reserve Banks or in Treasury-Direct accounts, will be made automatically on May 15, 2000.

Donald V. Hammond,

Fiscal Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-1107 Filed 1-14-00; 11:00 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-40-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
                                RSA SECURITY INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

                          (AS EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2000)

         WHEREAS, RSA Security Inc. ("RSA Security") maintains the RSA
Security Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, Effective March 1, 2000; and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.01 of the Plan, RSA Security has
reserved the right to amend the Plan and now deems it appropriate to do so;

         NOW THEREFORE, Section 10.01 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as
follows:

         Section 10.01 AMENDMENTS. The Board or the RSA Security Inc. Deferred
Compensation Committee may at any time amend this Plan in whole or in part,
provided, however, that no amendment shall be effective to decrease the balance
in any Deferral Account as accrued at the time of such amendment, nor shall any
amendment otherwise have a retroactive effect, unless such retroactive change is
necessary to maintain the tax deferred nature of the plan. Any plan provision
will be considered void in the event of a change in legislation or IRS treatment
regarding deferred compensation plans such that the provision would jeopardize
the tax deferred nature of the plan.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4028 

To amend the Act of June 4, 1897, to increase a penalty for the unauthorized 

landing of certain aircraft on wilderness areas of the National Forest System. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2020 

Mr. DAINES introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of June 4, 1897, to increase a penalty 

for the unauthorized landing of certain aircraft on wilderness areas of the National Forest System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASED PENALTY FOR UNAUTHORIZED 

4 LANDING OF AIRCRAFT ON WILDERNESS 

5 AREAS OF THE NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM. 

6 The eleventh undesignated paragraph under the 

7 heading ‘‘SURVEYING THE PUBLIC LANDS’’ under the 

8 heading ‘‘UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF THE IN9 TERIOR’’ in the first section of the Act of June 4, 1897 

10 (30 Stat. 35, chapter 2; 16 U.S.C. 551), is amended by 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4028 IS

1 adding at the end the following: ‘‘Notwithstanding any 

2 other provision of this paragraph, it shall be unlawful for 

3 any person to knowingly land aircraft (within the meaning 

4 of section 293.17(b) of title 36, Code of Federal Regula5 tions (or successor regulations)) on a wilderness area in 

6 the National Forest System, unless the landing is other7 wise authorized by laws (including regulations) applicable 

8 to the National Forest System or the National Wilderness 

9 Preservation System or the landing is an emergency land10 ing. Notwithstanding section 3571 of title 18, United 

11 States Code, any person who violates the preceding sen12 tence shall be fined not more than $20,000, imprisoned 

13 for not more than 6 months, or both.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.1

         AMENDMENT No. 6, dated February 10, 2003, to the Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement dated as of May 1, 1997 as heretofore amended (the
"Agreement") by and between CONCORD CAMERA CORP., a New Jersey corporation (the
"Company") and IRA B. LAMPERT (the "Executive").

         FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         1. The Base Salary provided for in Section 4 of the Agreement is
increased, effective as of January 1, 2003, to $900,000 per year.

         2. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue in full force
and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment No. 6
as of the date first above written.

                               CONCORD CAMERA CORP.


                               By: /s/ Brian F. King
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Brian F. King
                                    Senior Executive Vice President



                                        /s/ Ira B. Lampert
                               --------------------------------------------
                               IRA B. LAMPERT



Each of the undersigned hereby consents to the execution and delivery of the
foregoing Amendment No. 6 and acknowledges that its guaranty of the Company's
obligations under the Agreement, as amended, shall continue in full force and
effect:

CONCORD KEYSTONE SALES CORP.



By: /s/ Brian F. King
    ---------------------------------------------
    Brian F. King
    Senior Executive Vice President




                                       1


<PAGE>

CONCORD CAMERA ILLINOIS CORP.



By: /s/ Brian F. King
    ---------------------------------------------
    Brian F. King
    Senior Executive Vice President


CONCORD CAMERA (EUROPE) LIMITED


By: /s/ Brian F. King
    ---------------------------------------------
    Brian F. King, Director

By: /s/ Urs W. Stampfli
    ---------------------------------------------
    Urs W. Stampfli, Director


CONCORD CAMERA FRANCE SARL


By: /s/ Urs W. Stampfli
    ---------------------------------------------
    Urs W. Stampfli, Gerant


CONCORD CAMERA GMBH


By: /s/ Andreas Koenig
    ---------------------------------------------
    Andreas Koenig, Manager


CONCORD CAMERA (HK) LIMITED


By: /s/ Joseph Leonardo
    ---------------------------------------------
    Joseph Leonardo, Managing Director



                                       2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec. 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 16, 2000, Lonza 
Riverside, 900 River Road, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428, made 
application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of gamma hydroxybutyric acid 
(2010), a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule I.
    The firm plans to bulk manufacture gamma hydroxybutyric acid for 
distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than June 27, 2000.

    Dated: April 21, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-10668 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Knight Trading Group, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Thomas M. Joyce, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    THOMAS M.
JOYCEName: Thomas M. Joyce Title:   Chief Executive Officer and President Date:   March 10, 2004




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 25.952 Fuel system analysis and test. ( a ) Proper fuel system functioning under all probable operating conditions must be shown by analysis and those tests found necessary by the Administrator. Tests, if required, must be made using the airplane fuel system or a test article that reproduces the operating characteristics of the portion of the fuel system to be tested.
( b ) The likely failure of any heat exchanger using fuel as one of its fluids may not result in a hazardous condition.
[Amdt. 25-40, 42 FR 15043, Mar. 17, 1977]