alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LEWIS REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES

[78 C.Cls. 401; 292 U.S. 443]

Certiorari to review a judgment rejecting a claim for ^recovery of pension money applied by the Government for -the board of a veteran of the Spanish-American War at a Government hospital for the insane.

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. Upon certiorari, the judgment was reversed, May 28, 1934, the Supreme Court deciding:

1. Although the function of determining whether a veteran is entitled to hospital facilities under the World War Veterans Act, and of ordering his hospitalization or certifying to his right thereto, is a function of the Director of the Veterans Bureau, the right of the veteran, where it exists on indisputable facts as a matter of law, may be enforced by the courts.

*2.*An honorably discharged veteran of the Spanish-American War, suffering from a neuropsychiatric ailment, was in 1911 committed to St. Elizabeths Hospital by the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to statutory authority, and remained there confined as an insane1 person until, in 1930, he was discharged. *Held:*

(1) That the Veterans Bureau having had and exercised the right to make use of this hospital for insane veterans, the facilities of the hospital were under the control and jurisdiction of that Bureau within the meaning of § 202 (10) of the World War Veterans Act of 1924, as amended July 2,1926.

(2) Under the proviso of § 202 (10) of this Amended Act, the pension money credited to the veteran while in the hospital could not, upon his discharge, be withheld to pay for his board nt the hospital during that period.

*791(3) This applies to the charges for board incurred before July 2, 1926, the date, of the proviso, as well as to those incurred afterwards, the entire deduction having been made after the proviso became effective.

3. A statute is not rendered retroactive merely because the facts or requisites upon which its subsequent action depends, or some of them, are drawn from a time antecedent to the enactment. *Cox*v. *Hart,*260 U.S. 427, 435.

Mr. Justice Sutherland delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Exhibit 4.18

                      AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS
                      ------------------------------------

     This Amendment to Stock Purchase Warrants (this  "Amendment"),  dated April
25, 2003,  is made by and among  Peabodys  Coffee,  Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation
(d/b/a Black Rhino Coffee) with its headquarters  located at 3845 Atherton Road,
Suite 9, Rocklin,  California  95765 (the "Company") and AJW Partners,  LLC, AJW
Offshore, Ltd. and AJW Qualified Partners, LLC (collectively, the "Investors").

     WHEREAS:

     The Company has issued to the  Investors  certain Stock  Purchase  Warrants
dated December 20, 2002 and January 23, 2003 (collectively,  the "Stock Purchase
Warrants"); and

     The Company and the Investors  desire to amend the Stock Purchase  Warrants
as set forth below.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Investors hereby agree as follows:

1.   AMENDMENT OF STOCK PURCHASE  WARRANTS.  Each of the Stock Purchase Warrants
is hereby  amended to delete in its  entirety  Section  1(b)  thereof,  entitled
"Mandatory Exercise Rights."

2.   NO OTHER PROVISIONS OR DOCUMENTS  AFFECTED HEREBY.  This Amendment does not
affect any other provisions of the Stock Purchase  Warrants or the provisions of
any other document  entered into in connection with the  transactions  set forth
therein.


                       [Signatures on the Following Page]

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  have caused  this  Amendment  to be duly
executed as of the date first written above.


PEABODYS COFFEE, INC.


--------------------------------------
Todd N. Tkachuk
President


AJW PARTNERS, LLC
By:  SMS Group, LLC


--------------------------------------
Corey S. Ribotsky
Manager


AJW OFFSHORE, LTD.
By:  First Street Manager II, LLC


--------------------------------------
Corey S. Ribotsky
Manager


AJW QUALIFIED, LLC
By:  AJW Manager, LLC


------------------------------------
Corey S. Ribotsky
Manager

                                       2
<PAGE>
#### § 152.413 Notice requirement.

Each grantee shall give adequate notice to employees and applicants for employment, through posters provided by the Secretary, that the FAA is committed to the requirements of section 30 of the AADA, to ensure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, or sex, be excluded from participating in any activity conducted with funds authorized under this part.
EXHIBIT 32.1







Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Peter Klamka, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Cephas Holding Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge:



1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012.





|                        |     |                                                            | 
|----------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: February 20, 2014 | By: | /s/ Peter Klamka                                           | 
|                        |     | Name: Peter Klamka                                         | 
|                        |     | Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24305-1 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/24/23 15:35:09 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24305-1 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/24/23 15:35:09 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24305-1 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/24/23 15:35:09 Desc:

Exhibit Page 3 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24305-1 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/24/23 15:35:09 Desc:

Exhibit Page 4 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24305-1 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/24/23 15:35:09 Desc:

Exhibit Page 5 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24305-1 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/24/23 15:35:09 Desc:

Exhibit Page 6 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24305-1 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/24/23 15:35:09 Desc:

Exhibit Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT 10.1.10

AMENDMENT ONE        TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT        Dated November 1, 2002

The Doe Run Resources Corporation (the "Company") and Jeffrey L. Zelms (the "Employee" or "you") agree, effective November 1, 2002, to amend the Amended
and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated November 1, 2002, between the Company and Employee, by:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first written above.

| | THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION
d/b/a The Doe Run Company
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/IRA LEON RENNERTIra Leon Rennert
Chairman of the Board  
| | /s/JEFFREY L. ZELMSJeffrey L. Zelms
Employee               



QuickLinks
#### § 13.236 Alternative dispute resolution.

Parties may use mediation to achieve resolution of issues in controversy addressed by this subpart. Parties seeking alternative dispute resolution services may engage the services of a mutually acceptable mediator. The mediator must not participate in the adjudication under this subpart of any matter in which the mediator has provided mediation services. Mediation discussions and submissions will remain confidential consistent with the provisions of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act and other applicable Federal laws.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,470,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,653,944
<PP&E>                                         410,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                 332,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,731,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          179,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,719
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,142,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,731,759
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               405,709
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,465,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             182,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,234,181)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Docket No. FAA

- 2013

- 0671
§ 187.51 Applicability of overflight fees. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (c) or (d) of this section, any person who conducts an overflight through either Enroute or Oceanic airspace must pay a fee as calculated in § 187.53.
( b ) *Services.* Persons covered by paragraph (a) of this section must pay a fee for the FAA's rendering or providing of certain services, including but not limited to the following: ( 1 ) Air traffic management.
( 2 ) Communications.
( 3 ) Navigation.
( 4 ) Radar surveillance, including separation services.
( 5 ) Flight information services.
( 6 ) Procedural control.
( 7 ) Emergency services and training.
( c ) The FAA does not assess a fee for any military or civilian overflight operated by the United States Government or by any foreign government.
( d ) Fees for overflights through U.S.-controlled airspace covered by a written FAA agreement or other binding arrangement are charged according to the terms of that agreement or arrangement unless the terms are silent on fees.
[Docket FAA-2015-3597, Amdt. 187-36, 81 FR 85853, Nov. 29, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10480]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Corrections


Advisory Board Meeting

Time and Date: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Monday, June 5, 2000 and 8 a.m. 
to 12 noon on Tuesday, June 6, 2000.

Place: On Monday, June 5--National Institute of Corrections Offices, 
1960 Industrial Circle, Longmont, Colorado 80501. On Tuesday, June 6--
Raintree Plaza Hotel and Conference Center, 1900 Ken Pratt Boulevard, 
Longmont, Colorado 80501.

Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered: Tours/Presentations Concerning National 
Institute of Corrections Training Space, Information Center and 
Computer Lab; Report on Office of Offender Job Training and Placement; 
Updates on Mental Health Program Options, the NIC Strategic Plan, 
Interstate Compact Activities, Advisory Board Hearings; and Reports by 
Program Divisions Concerning Technical Assistance.

Contact Person for More Information: Larry Solomon, Deputy Director, 
(202) 307-3106, ext. 155.

Morris L. Thigpen,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-10480 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-36-M
§ 137.39 Economic poison dispensing. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may dispense or cause to be dispensed from an aircraft, any economic poison that is registered with the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 135-135k)— ( 1 ) For a use other than that for which it is registered;
( 2 ) Contrary to any safety instructions or use limitations on its label; or
( 3 ) In violation of any law or regulation of the United States.
( b ) This section does not apply to any person dispensing economic poisons for experimental purposes under— ( 1 ) The supervision of a Federal or State agency authorized by law to conduct research in the field of economic poisons; or
( 2 ) A permit from the U.S. Department of Agriculture issued pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 135-135k).
[Amdt. 137-2, 31 FR 6686, May 5, 1966]
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                       <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,218                   7,476
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,930                  96,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,635                   1,435
<INVENTORY>                                     32,236                  41,247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,947                 157,900
<PP&E>                                         587,910                 751,588
<DEPRECIATION>                                 327,614                 364,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 385,491                 598,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,132                 160,845
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                         337                (326,172)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   385,491                 598,672
<SALES>                                        521,707                 588,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               521,707                 588,131
<CGS>                                          437,301                 470,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  437,301                 470,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,653                  72,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,940                  57,833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,813                 (12,749)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       600                   1,092
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,213                 (13,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                     675
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,213                 (14,516)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
§ 14.28 Review by FAA decisionmaker. ( a ) In proceedings other than those under part 17 of this chapter and the AMS, either the applicant or the FAA counsel may seek review of the initial decision on the fee application in accordance with subpart G of part 13 of this chapter, specifically § 13.233. Additionally, the FAA Decisionmaker may decide to review the decision on his/her own initiative. If neither the applicant nor the FAA's counsel seeks review within 30 days after the decision is issued, it shall become final. Whether to review a decision is a matter within the discretion of the FAA Decisionmaker. If review is taken, the FAA Decisionmaker will issue a final decision on the application or remand the application to the ALJ who issue the initial fee award determination for further proceedings.
( b ) In proceedings under part 17 of this chapter and the AMS, the adjudicative officer shall prepare findings and recommendations for the Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition with recommendations as to whether or not an award should be made, the amount of the award, and the reasons therefor. The Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition shall submit a recommended order to the Administrator after the completion of all submissions related to the EAJA application. Upon the Administrator's action, the order shall become final, and may be reviewed under 49 U.S.C. 46110.
[Doc. No. FAA-1998-4379, 64 FR 32936, June 18, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 8238, Feb. 18, 2005]
From: Matthew Todd <ToddM@api.org> 

Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 5:20 PM 

To: Lassiter, Penny 

Cc: Shine, Brenda 

Subject: API Comment Solicitation Letter 

Penny, 

From our previous discussions, we are generally aware that the Agency is considering adding 

requirements for flares, delayed coking, and fenceline monitoring in the upcoming Refinery Sector 

Rule, along with amendments to many existing provisions of part 63 subparts CC and UUU and 

part 60 subpart Ja. As such, we offer our views in the attached letter on some issues of particular 

concern to us to assure they are fully vetted during the comment period. We appreciate the 

dialogue that we continue to have with you on this and other refinery sector issues. Please contact 

me if you would like to discuss any of these issues further. 

Thanks, 

Matt 

Matthew Todd 

API 

202.682.8319 

<< 2013 12 12 EPA Comment Solicitation Letter Final.pdf >>
§ 17.35 Use of alternative dispute resolution. ( a ) By statutory mandate, it is the policy of the FAA to use voluntary ADR to the maximum extent practicable to resolve matters pending at the ODRA. The ODRA therefore uses voluntary ADR as its primary means of resolving all factual, legal, and procedural controversies.
( b ) The parties are encouraged to make a good faith effort to explore ADR possibilities in all cases and to employ ADR in every appropriate case. The ODRA uses ADR techniques such as mediation, neutral evaluation, binding arbitration or variations of these techniques as agreed by the parties and approved by the ODRA. At the beginning of each case, the ODRA assigns a DRO as a potential neutral to explore ADR options with the parties and to convene an ADR process. See § 17.35(b).
( c ) The ODRA Adjudicative Process will be used where the parties cannot achieve agreement on the use of ADR; where ADR has been employed but has not resolved all pending issues in dispute; or where the ODRA concludes that ADR will not provide an expeditious means of resolving a particular dispute. Even where the Adjudicative Process is to be used, the ODRA, with the parties' consent, may employ informal ADR techniques concurrently with the adjudication.
(LOGO) AMRESCO


February 9, 1999

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Texas Commerce Tower
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 1600
Dallas, Texas 75201

Dear Sirs:

As of and for the year ended  December 31,  1998,  AMRESCO  Management,  Inc., a
subsidiary  of AMRESCO,  INC.,  has complied in all material  respects  with the
minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth in  Appendix  A. Such  standards  were
established by AMRESCO Management Inc. based on the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP).

A list of the portfolios covered by this  representation is included in Appendix
B.

For the period  January 1, 1998 through  December  30, 1998 AMRESCO  Management,
Inc.  had in effect a  fidelity  bond in the amount of  $23,000,000,  errors and
omissions  liability  coverage  in the  amount  of $l0,000,000,  and  mortgage
impairment protection in the amount of $23,000,000. Beginning December 31, 1998,
AMRESCO Management, Inc. increased its coverage, resulting in a fidelity bond in
the amount of $43,000,000,  and mortgage impairment  protection in the amount of
$43,000,000. Errors and omissions liability coverage remained at $10,000,000.00.

Don M. Skidmore
Senior Vice President
AMRESCO, INC.

Ron Kirkland, Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
AMRESCO, INC.

Elaine Miller
Director, Loan Servicing
AMRESCO, INC.

AMRESCO, INC.
700  North  Pearl  Street  *  Suite  2400 * LB 342 *  Dallas,  Texas  75201-7424
214-953-7700
http://www.amresco.com
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

        Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                   Regarding Periodic Reports Filed Under the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

     The  undersigned  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of
Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the "Company") certify that:

     1.  This statement is being filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350.

     2.  This statement accompanies the Company's  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal  quarter  ended June 30,  2002 (the  "Quarterly  Report"),  which
contains unaudited financial statements of the Company for such fiscal quarter.

     3.  The Quarterly Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and the
information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     This  statement has been signed by the following  persons in the capacities
indicated on August 14, 2002.




/s/ Ralph C. Guild                           /s/ William J. McEntee, Jr.
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Ralph C. Guild                               William J. McEntee, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:

- the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and - the information
contained in the report fairly presents, on all material respects, the Company's
financial condition and results of operations.

/s/ Kevin A. Schmidt
Kevin A. Schmidt, Principal Financial Officer

Dated:  August 8, 2005



                                       28