alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 25.1547 Magnetic direction indicator. ( a ) A placard meeting the requirements of this section must be installed on, or near, the magnetic direction indicator.
( b ) The placard must show the calibration of the instrument in level flight with the engines operating.
( c ) The placard must state whether the calibration was made with radio receivers on or off.
( d ) Each calibration reading must be in terms of magnetic heading in not more than 45 degree increments.
§ 13.214 Amendment of pleadings. ( a ) *Filing and service.* A party must file the amendment with the FAA Hearing Docket and must serve a copy of the amendment on the administrative law judge, if assigned, and on all parties to the proceeding.
( b ) *Time.* ( 1 ) Not later than 15 days before the scheduled date of a hearing, a party may amend a complaint or an answer without the consent of the administrative law judge.
( 2 ) Less than 15 days before the scheduled date of a hearing, the administrative law judge may allow amendment of a complaint or an answer only for good cause shown in a motion to amend.
( c ) *Responses.* The administrative law judge must allow a reasonable time, but not more than 20 days from the date of filing, for other parties to respond if an amendment to a complaint, answer, or other pleading has been filed with the FAA Hearing Docket and served on the administrative law judge and other parties.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-C(M1).                    

*Date:*                         May 3-5, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         7 p.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency San Francisco, 5 Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, CA 94111.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dan E. Matsumoto, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 6AS37B, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, (301) 594-8894.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: April 17, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-10171  Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

mntteb ~tates qcourt of §ppeaIs

for tbe jfeberaI qctrcutt

IN RE FUSION-IO, INC.,

Petitioner.

Miscellaneous Docket No. 139

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no.

11-CV-0391, Judge Rodney Gilstrap.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Solid State Storage Systems, Inc. moves without opposition for a 10-day extension of time, until October 15,

2012, to respond to Fusion-io, Inc.'s petition for a writ of

mandamus.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

, The motion is granted. Solid State's response is due

no later than October 15, 2012.

Case: 12-139 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 10/02/2012
IN RE FUSION-IO, INC.

OCT 02 2012

Date

cc: Scott F. Partridge, Esq.

Theodore Stevenson, III, Esq.

s21

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

2

Case: 12-139 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 10/02/2012
#### § 25.871 Leveling means.

There must be means for determining when the airplane is in a level position on the ground.

[Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5676, Apr. 8, 1970]
#### SNOW v. THE CITY OF ANNISTON.

(Decided January 12th, 1915.)

Appeal from Calhoun Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Hugh D. Merrill.

No counsel marked for appellant. S. W. Tate, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate:
§ 13.235 Judicial review of a final decision and order. ( a ) In cases under the Federal aviation statute, a party may seek judicial review of a final decision and order of the Administrator, as provided in 49 U.S.C. 46110(a), and, as applicable, in 49 U.S.C. 46301(d)(7)(D)(iii), 46301(g), or 47532.
( b ) In cases under the Federal hazardous materials transportation statute, a party may seek judicial review of a final decision and order of the Administrator, as provided in 49 U.S.C. 5127.
( c ) A party seeking judicial review of a final order issued by the Administrator may file a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit or in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the party resides or has its principal place of business.
( d ) The party must file the petition for review no later than 60 days after service of the Administrator's final decision and order.
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.10 Carrier. ( a ) *Local or joint tariffs.* A carrier may issue and file, in its own name, tariff publications which contain: ( 1 ) Local fares of such carrier only, and provisions governing such local fares, and/or
( 2 ) Joint fares which apply jointly via such issuing carrier in connection with other carriers (participating in the tariff publications under authority of their concurrences given to the issuing carrier as provided in § 221.140) and provisions governing such joint fares. Provisions for account of an individual participating carrier may be published to govern such joint fares provided § 221.40(a)(9) is complied with. A carrier shall not issue and file tariff publications containing local fares of other carriers, joint rates or fares in which the issuing carrier does not participate, or provisions governing such local or joint fares.
( 3 ) Rules and regulations governing foreign air transportation to the extent provided by this part and/or Department order. Rules and regulations may be published in separate governing tariffs, as provided in subpart G.
( b ) *Issuing officer.* An officer or designated employee of the issuing carrier shall be shown as the issuing officer of a tariff publication issued by a carrier, and such issuing officer shall file the tariff publication with the Department on behalf of the issuing carrier and all carriers participating in the tariff publication.
§ 25.373 Speed control devices. If speed control devices (such as spoilers and drag flaps) are installed for use in en route conditions— ( a ) The airplane must be designed for the symmetrical maneuvers prescribed in §§ 25.333 and 25.337, the yawing maneuvers in § 25.351, and the vertical and lateral gust and turbulence conditions prescribed in § 25.341(a) and (b) at each setting and the maximum speed associated with that setting; and
( b ) If the device has automatic operating or load limiting features, the airplane must be designed for the maneuver and gust conditions prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section, at the speeds and corresponding device positions that the mechanism allows.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29776, July 20, 1990; Amdt. 25-86, 61 FR 5222, Feb. 9, 1996; Amdt. 25-141, 79 FR 73468, Dec. 11, 2014]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3240 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3240

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate the La Entrada al Pacifico Corridor in the State of Texas 
      as a high priority corridor on the National Highway System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2003

Mr. Neugebauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate the La Entrada al Pacifico Corridor in the State of Texas 
      as a high priority corridor on the National Highway System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LA ENTRADA AL PACIFICO CORRIDOR, TEXAS.

    Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 
Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(45) In the State of Texas, the La Entrada al Pacifico 
        Corridor consisting of the following highways and any portion 
        of a highway in a corridor on 2 miles of either side of the 
        center line of the highway--
                    ``(A) State Route 349 from Lamesa to the point on 
                that highway that is closest to 32 degrees, 7 minutes, 
                north latitude, by 102 degrees, 6 minutes, west 
                longitude;
                    ``(B) the segment or any roadway extending from the 
                point described by subparagraph (A) to the point on 
                Farm-to-Market Road 1788 closest to 32 degrees, 0 
                minutes, north latitude, by 102 degrees, 16 minutes, 
                west longitude;
                    ``(C) Farm-to-Market Road 1788 from the point 
                described by subparagraph (B) to its intersection with 
                Interstate Route 20;
                    ``(D) Interstate Route 20 from its intersection 
                with Farm-to-Market Road 1788 to its intersection with 
                United States Route 385;
                    ``(E) United States Route 385 from Odessa to Fort 
                Stockton, including those portions that parallel United 
                States Route 67 and Interstate Route 10; and
                    ``(F) United States Route 67 from Fort Stockton to 
                Presidio, including those portions that parallel 
                Interstate Route 10 and United States Route 90.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### ROSS et al. v. DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY et al.

No. 33302.

Jan. 13, 1948.

188 P. 2d *861.*

Hall & Cotten, of Oklahoma City, for petitioners.

Little' & Hoyt, of Oklahoma City, for respondents.

RILEY, J.

Petitioners seek to prohibit respondent from exercising jurisdiction in the trial of cause 111,545 pending in the trial court. By the pending action, W. A. Preston seeks in the district court of Oklahoma county to determine an interest in land situated in Payne county, consisting of an oil and gas royalty alleged to have- been acquired as a result of his joint adventure with defendants.

12 O. S. 1941 §131, subd. (1), restricts actions for the determination in any form of any right or interest in real property to the county in which the subject of the action is situated. An accounting sought between the joint adventurers is dependent upon the interest in land sought to be determined and is' therefore ancillary. Royalty is an interest in real property. Hudson v. Smith, 171 Okla. 79, 41 P. 2d 861; Franklin et al. v. Margay Oil Corp., 194 Okla. 519, 153 P. 2d 486.

Let the writ issue.

HURST, C.J., and BAYLESS, CORN, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur DAVISON, V.C.J., and WELCH and ARNOLD, JJ., dissent.
§ 23.2530 External and cockpit lighting. ( a ) The applicant must design and install all lights to minimize any adverse effects on the performance of flightcrew duties.
( b ) Any position and anti-collision lights, if required by part 91 of this chapter, must have the intensities, flash rate, colors, fields of coverage, and other characteristics to provide sufficient time for another aircraft to avoid a collision.
( c ) Any position lights, if required by part 91 of this chapter, must include a red light on the left side of the airplane, a green light on the right side of the airplane, spaced laterally as far apart as practicable, and a white light facing aft, located on an aft portion of the airplane or on the wing tips.
( d ) Any taxi and landing lights must be designed and installed so they provide sufficient light for night operations.
( e ) For seaplanes or amphibian airplanes, riding lights must provide a white light visible in clear atmospheric conditions.
04/1G/2010 15:59 FAX 2024935U2 

04/16/10 FRI 13:21 FAX 618 895 0675 

FAA + DMS 

ARTHUR WASSERMAN . ESQ. 

12002/003 

121001 

LAW OFFICE OF 

ARTHUR WASSERMAN 

•.^T^'^M 

April 16,2010 

V A N MiA-s, f:At.iW)R>orA 'Ji-iO(i-i2;i 

TELEPHONE (ai8) S'J5-K234 

I'ACilMLLl.; (HIW «'JS-iir.7J 

Federal Aviation Admiuisiration 

800 Independence Ave. SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Vicki Leemon, Esq. 

AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building 

Suite 2W1000 

If::-/ ^•Lii^'izivtiD \i^\ 

APR 1 6 2010 

H£AR3MG DCX:KET 

VIA FACSIMILE (202) 493-5142 and CERTIFIED MAIL 

Re: F.A.A. v. SunQuesi Executive Air Chancr, Inc. 

FAA Docket No CPO8WF0004 

DMS No. FAA-2008-0238 

Dear Ms. Leemon. 

r received word from Mr. Contc that he will agree to a 30-day exitcnsion of 

time for Mr. Wassemian to file his brief in the above matter. As 1 expleiined during our 

telephone conversation on Tue.sday, April 13*, Mr. Wasserman has been in ihe hospital 

fighting a staph infection. 

Tliank you for your courtesy and patience with me as T am covering for Mr. 

Wasserman as best as i can until he can leave the hospital and resume his normal 

workload. If you need any further information, or additional paperwork, please let me 

know and 1 will ensure it will get done. 

Very truly yours, 

Christina Merrick for 

Lavv Office of Arthur Wassentian 
04/1G/2010 15:59 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS @l003/003 

04/18/10 FRI 13:21 FAX 818 895 0675 .. ARTHITB WASSERMAN . ESQ. 12002 

Cc- Joseph A. Conte, Esq. 

Manager, Air Carrier and Operations Law 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Washington, DC 20591
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

#### § 21.611 Issuance.

If the FAA finds that the applicant complies with the requirements of this subchapter, the FAA issues a TSO authorization to the applicant (including all TSO deviations granted to the applicant).
**Exhibit
      15**
 
 
 
 
 
 August
      2,
      2007
 
 
 Securities
      and Exchange Commission
 100
      F
      Street, N.E.
 Washington,
      D.C. 20549
 
 
 
 
 Commissioners:
 
 We
      are
      aware that our report dated August 2, 2007 on our review of interim financial
      information of Unit Corporation for the three and six month periods ended June
      30, 2007 and 2006 and included in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 is incorporated by reference in its
      registration statements on Form S-8 (File No.’s 33-19652, 33-44103, 33-49724,
      33-64323, 33-53542, 333-38166, 333-39584, 333-135194 and 333-137857) and Form
      S-3 (File No.’s 333-104165, 333-83551, 333-99979 and 333-128213).
 
 Very
      truly yours,
 
 /s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of General Metals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Parent, the President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 15, 2006.

 

/s/ Stephen Parent                                                          

Stephen Parent

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

D/JCU/732805.1
Order entered Decem ber 30 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00 593
- CR JOSE LOZANO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194 th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. F12
- 31495
- M



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On October 27, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter’s record has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court

- appointed counsel; (3) counsel timely requested preparation of the reporter’s record; (4) Belinda Baraka is the court reporter who recorded the proceedings; (5) Ms. Baraka’s explanation for the delay in fi ling the record is her workload; and (6) Ms. Baraka requires forty

- five days from the December 19, 2014 findings to file the record.
We ORDER Belinda Baraka to file the reporter’s record by 4:00 p.m. on FEBRUARY 2, 2015 . We note the record is already four months overdue, the appeal was abated for twomonths awaiting the trial court’s findings, and at no time did Ms. Baraka communicate with the

Court regarding the status of the record. Accordingly, if the complete reporter’s record is not filed by the date and time specified, we will order that she not sit as a court reporter until she has filed the record in this appeal.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Ernest White, Presiding Judge, 194th Judic ial District Court; Belinda Baraka, official court reporter, 194th Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
§ 27.1163 Powerplant accessories. ( a ) Each engine-mounted accessory must— ( 1 ) Be approved for mounting on the engine involved;
( 2 ) Use the provisions on the engine for mounting; and
( 3 ) Be sealed in such a way as to prevent contamination of the engine oil system and the accessory system.
( b ) Unless other means are provided, torque limiting means must be provided for accessory drives located on any component of the transmission and rotor drive system to prevent damage to these components from excessive accessory load.
[Amdt. 27-2, 33 FR 964, Jan. 26, 1968, as amended by Amdt. 27-20, 49 FR 6849, Feb. 23, 1984; Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34214, Sept. 2, 1988]
§ 25.25 Weight limits. ( a ) *Maximum weights.* Maximum weights corresponding to the airplane operating conditions (such as ramp, ground or water taxi, takeoff, en route, and landing), environmental conditions (such as altitude and temperature), and loading conditions (such as zero fuel weight, center of gravity position and weight distribution) must be established so that they are not more than— ( 1 ) The highest weight selected by the applicant for the particular conditions; or
( 2 ) The highest weight at which compliance with each applicable structural loading and flight requirement is shown, except that for airplanes equipped with standby power rocket engines the maximum weight must not be more than the highest weight established in accordance with appendix E of this part; or
( 3 ) The highest weight at which compliance is shown with the certification requirements of Part 36 of this chapter.
( b ) *Minimum weight.* The minimum weight (the lowest weight at which compliance with each applicable requirement of this part is shown) must be established so that it is not less than— ( 1 ) The lowest weight selected by the applicant;
( 2 ) The design minimum weight (the lowest weight at which compliance with each structural loading condition of this part is shown); or
( 3 ) The lowest weight at which compliance with each applicable flight requirement is shown.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5671, Apr. 8, 1970; Amdt. 25-63, 53 FR 16365, May 6, 1988]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2769 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 15:43:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2769 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 15:43:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2769 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 15:43:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2769 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 15:43:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2769 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 15:43:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2769 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 15:43:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2769 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 15:43:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 7 of 7
§ 704.22 Membership fees. ( a ) A corporate credit union may charge its members a membership fee. The fee may be one-time or periodic.
( b ) The corporate credit union must calculate the fee uniformly for all members as a percentage of each member's assets, except that the corporate credit union may reduce the amount of the fee for members that have contributed capital to the corporate credit union. Any reduction must be proportional to the amount of the member's nondepleted contributed capital.
( c ) The corporate credit union must give its members at least six months advance notice of any initial or new fee, including terms and conditions, before invoicing the fee. For a recurring fee, the corporate credit union must also give six months notice of any material change to the terms and conditions of the fee.
( d ) The corporate credit union may terminate the membership of any credit union that fails to pay the fee in full within 60 days of the invoice date.
[76 FR 23871, Apr. 29, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 62211, Oct. 2, 2020]