alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 | P a g e

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.,

Debtor1

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER

AUTHORITY (“PREPA”)

 Debtor

PROMESA Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

PROMESA Title III 

No. 17 BK-4780-LTS

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SPANISH LANGUAGE DOCUMENT AND

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CERTIFIED ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS

COMES NOW, Sistema de Retiro de los Empleados de la Autoridad de Energía Eléctrica 

("SREAEE"), creditor and party in interest, through its undersigned attorneys, and before this 

Honorable Court very respectfully states and prays:

1. On May 25, SREAEE filed a document named SREAEE’s Oposition to “Motion of the 

Official Committee of Retired Employees of The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

Regarding Representation of PREPA Retirees”.

2. SREAEE attached to the motion the SREAEE’s Regulations in Spanish language (the

“Spanish Language Document”).

3. SREAEE is aware that the Local Rules for this District require that all documents filed 

with this Honorable Court must be in English. SREAEE is preparing certified 

translations of the Spanish Language Document and respectfully requests a ten (10) day 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3155 Filed:05/25/18 Entered:05/25/18 15:47:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 | P a g e

extension, that is, until June 4, 2018, to submit the certified translations.

WHEREFORE, SREAEE requests a ten (10) day extension, that is, until June 4, 2018, 

to submit the certified translations of the Spanish Language Document.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to 

all participants and Standard Parties. Paper copies have been mailed pursuant to Section II of 

the Fourth Amended Notice, Case Management and Administrative Procedures:

(i) Chambers of the Honorable Laura Taylor Swain (two copies shall be delivered 

to the chambers): 

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 

Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 

500 Pearl St., Suite No. 3212 

New York, New York 10007-1312; 

(ii) Office of the United States Trustee for Region 21 

Edificio Ochoa, 500 Tanca Street, Suite 301 

San Juan, PR 00901-1922

In Ponce, Puerto Rico, this 25th day of May, 2018.

/s/Rolando Emmanuelli Jiménez 

USDC: 214105

/s/Yasmín Colón Colón

USDC: 230814

/s/Jessica E. Méndez Colberg 

USDC: 302108

Bufete Emmanuelli, C.S.P.

PO Box 10779

Ponce, Puerto Rico 00732

Tel.: 787-848-0666

Fax: 1-787-841-1435

E-mail: rolando@bufete-emmanuelli.com

yasmin@bufete-emmanuelli.com

jessica@bufete-emmanuelli.com

notificaciones@bufete-emmanuelli.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3155 Filed:05/25/18 Entered:05/25/18 15:47:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1919

STARSHA M. SEWELL, M.Ed. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WESTAT , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. ( 8:16

- cv
- 00158

- RWT )

Submitted : January 22, 2018 Decided: January 24, 2018

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Todd James Horn, Lillian Lane Reynolds, VENABLE, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CUR IAM:
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s order s denying three post

- judgment
motions . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Westat , No. 8:16

- cv
- 00158

- RWT (D. Md. July 6 & 31, 2017; Aug. 11, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B de C.V. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results from operations of the Company.

Date: April 27, 2012



/s/ José Antonio Fernández CarbajalJosé Antonio Fernández Carbajal Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 27, 2012



/s/ Javier Astaburuaga SanjinesJavier Astaburuaga Sanjines
Chief Financial Officer
§ 25.1127 Exhaust driven turbo-superchargers. ( a ) Each exhaust driven turbo-supercharger must be approved or shown to be suitable for the particular application. It must be installed and supported to ensure safe operation between normal inspections and overhauls. In addition, there must be provisions for expansion and flexibility between exhaust conduits and the turbine.
( b ) There must be provisions for lubricating the turbine and for cooling turbine parts where temperatures are critical.
( c ) If the normal turbo-supercharger control system malfunctions, the turbine speed may not exceed its maximum allowable value. Except for the waste gate operating components, the components provided for meeting this requirement must be independent of the normal turbo-supercharger controls.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

and the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost
Plus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Barry J. Feld, Chief Executive Officer and President of
the Company, and Thomas D. Willardson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                      
|/s/ BARRY J. FELD                                                                                                     
|Barry J. Feld Chief Executive Officer, President (Principal Executive Officer)  December 7, 2006                      
|                                                                                                                      
|/s/ THOMAS D. WILLARDSON                                                                                              
|Thomas D. Willardson Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  December 7, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1919

STARSHA M. SEWELL, M.Ed.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WESTAT,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-00158-RWT)

Submitted: January 22, 2018 Decided: January 24, 2018

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Todd James Horn, Lillian Lane Reynolds, VENABLE, 

LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying three post-judgment 

motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Westat, No. 8:16-cv-00158-

RWT (D. Md. July 6 & 31, 2017; Aug. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### HOLMES MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. M-391.

Decided April 2, 1934.]

*264
      *Mr. 'Wüliam A. Neacey*for the plaintiff. *Mr. William Cogger*was on the briefs.

*Mr. John W. Hussey,*with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frank J.*Wideman, for the defendant.

*266Green, *Judge,*

delivered the opinion of the court:

This suit is begun to recover $1,600.95, representing part of an overpayment of income and profits taxes for 1917 which had been credited to deficiencies in the taxes for the years 1915 and 1916, more than five years after the original returns for those years had been filed. The petition in the case was not filed within the period prescribed for the *267commencement of suits to obtain a refund of taxes, but plaintiff bases its case upon the theory that the so-called “ certificate of overassessment ” which it received about November 11, 1925, constituted an account stated, or at least was such as to the item of overassessment contained therein. This certificate showed the amount of the overassessment and that disposition had been made of it by crediting it upon certain deficiencies in taxes for other years, and the balance refundable after such credits had been made. A check was enclosed for this balance which was received and cashed by plaintiff. In other words, it was a statement of the account between the plaintiff and defendant with reference to taxes which had been assessed against plaintiff showing that a balance was due the plaintiff thereon which was accordingly refunded. The findings show that there was no agreement express or implied that any other sums would be refunded beyond the amount which was paid.

It is quite obvious there was no account stated in favor of plaintiff except for the balance shown. The amount of this balance was paid leaving nothing due as the account was stated. Plaintiff seeks to take the one item of the account which showed the amount of the overassessment and ignore the credits and the refund made on the other side of the account. We have repeatedly held that this cannot be done, and without citing all of the many cases that support our holding, would call attention particularly to *R. H. Stearns Co.*v. *United*States, 291 U.S. 54; *Leisenring*v. *United*States, 78 C.Cls. 171 (certiorari denied); and *Samuel Daube*v. *United*States, 78 C.Cls. 754.

The plaintiff received the check for the balance shown to be due by the account, and cashed it without making any objection thereto until almost six years later when this suit was commenced. Instead of being an account stated in favor of the plaintiff it was really an account settled. Cf. *Stearns Co.*v. *United*States, *supra.*

Plaintiff’s action is without merit, and it is ordered that its petition be dismissed.

Whaley, *Judge;*Williams, *Judge;*Littleton, *Judge;*and Booth, *Chief*Justice, concur.
§ 125.507 Fuel tank system inspection program. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (g) of this section, this section applies to transport category, turbine-powered airplanes with a type certificate issued after January 1, 1958, that, as a result of original type certification or later increase in capacity, have— ( 1 ) A maximum type-certificated passenger capacity of 30 or more, or
( 2 ) A maximum payload capacity of 7500 pounds or more.
( b ) For each airplane on which an auxiliary fuel tank is installed under a field approval, before June 16, 2008, the certificate holder must submit to the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office proposed maintenance instructions for the tank that meet the requirements of Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (SFAR 88) of this chapter.
( c ) After December 16, 2008, no certificate holder may operate an airplane identified in paragraph (a) of this section unless the inspection program for that airplane has been revised to include applicable inspections, procedures, and limitations for fuel tank systems.
( d ) The proposed fuel tank system inspection program revisions must be based on fuel tank system Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) that have been developed in accordance with the applicable provisions of SFAR 88 of this chapter or § 25.1529 and part 25, Appendix H, of this chapter, in effect on June 6, 2001 (including those developed for auxiliary fuel tanks, if any, installed under supplemental type certificates or other design approval) and that have been approved by the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office.
( e ) After December 16, 2008, before returning an aircraft to service after any alteration for which fuel tank ICA are developed under SFAR 88, or under § 25.1529 in effect on June 6, 2001, the certificate holder must include in the inspection program for the airplane inspections and procedures for the fuel tank system based on those ICA.
( f ) The fuel tank system inspection program changes identified in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section and any later fuel tank system revisions must be submitted to the Principal Inspector for review and approval.
( g ) This section does not apply to the following airplane models: ( 1 ) Bombardier CL-44
( 2 ) Concorde
( 3 ) deHavilland D.H. 106 Comet 4C
( 4 ) VFW-Vereinigte Flugtechnische Werk VFW-614
( 5 ) Illyushin Aviation IL 96T
( 6 ) Bristol Aircraft Britannia 305
( 7 ) Handley Page Herald Type 300
( 8 ) Avions Marcel Dassault—Breguet Aviation Mercure 100C
( 9 ) Airbus Caravelle
( 10 ) Lockheed L-300
[Amdt. 125-53, 72 FR 63412, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 125-68, 83 FR 9174, Mar. 5, 2018]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

HUGH HOWELL HESTER, JR. )

and JENNIFER F. PLOUFFE, as )

natural Guardians of and on behalf of )

C.H., a minor, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2294

)

ALL CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM )

INC., a Florida Corporation; ALL )

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, INC., a )

Florida Corporation; PALM HARBOR )

INTERNAL MEDICINE AND )

PEDIATRICS, P.A., a Florida )

Professional Association; and )

KARENA AILEEN NERI, M.D., )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed August 24, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Jack R. St. Arnold, Judge.

Shea T. Moxon, Celene H. Humphries,

and Joseph T. Eagleton of Brannock &

Humphries, Tampa; John F. Romano

and Corey B. Friedman of Ramano Law

Group, West Palm Beach, for Appellants.

Marie A. Borland, C. Howard Hunter,

and David Hughes of Hill, Ward, &

Henderson, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees
- 2 -

All Children's Health System, Inc. and 

All Children's Hospital, Inc.

Dinah Stein and Sharon R. Vosseller of 

Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., 

Miami, and Jeffrey M. Goodis of Goodis 

Thompson & Miller, P.A. St. Petersburg,

for Appellees Palm Harbor Internal 

Medicine and Pediatrics, P.A.

and Karena Aileen Neri, M.D.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Schneider Electric Positio

• Need to have M4 options

– Available at EL4 for DL7– Available between EL3 and EL4 for DL

• Time Line

– DL8 January 2015 EL3.5 (99.20%– DL7 January 2017 EL4

• New table attached
kVA Efficiency Date Improve

15 97.81% Jan-2017 27.430 98.49% Jan-2017 40.445 98.64% Jan-2017 41.475 98.80% Jan-2017 40.5

112.5 98.91% Jan-2017 40.1

150 98.99% Jan-2017 40.9225 99.14% Jan-2015 43.1300 99.20% Jan-2015 43.2500 99.30% Jan-2015 46.1750 99.36% Jan-2015 47.2

1000 99.41% Jan-2015 46.3

scaling on 15kVA 0.62
$1,500

$2,000$2,500$3,000$3,500$4,000$4,500$5,000$5,500$6,000$6,500

98.60% 98.65% 98.70% 98.75% 98.80% 98.85% 98.90% 98.95% 99.00%

Efficiency at 35% Load, Temperature Corrected

Manufacturer Selling Price ($)

M4_CuAl_fm_3legM3_AlAl_fm_3legM3_AlAl_slm_3legM3_AlAl_dgw_3legH0_AlAl_fm_3legH0_AlAl_slm_3legZDMH_AlAl_dgw_3legH0_CuCu_fm_3legCSLs

EL 3

EL4

45% 40% 15% 

DL7 - Comments
$4,000

$5,000$6,000$7,000$8,000$9,000

$10,000

99.00% 99.05% 99.10% 99.15% 99.20% 99.25% 99.30% 99.35%

Efficiency at 35% Load, Temperature Corrected

Manufacturer Selling Price ($)

M4_CuAl_fm_3legM3_AlAl_fm_3legM3_AlAl_slm_3legM3_AlAl_dgw_3legH0_AlAl_fm_3legH0_AlAl_slm_5legZDMH_AlAl_dgw_5legCSLs

EL3

 4% 5% 1% 60% 30%

EL 4

35% 63% 3%

DL8 - Comments
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B. Grant Yarber,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/*B. Grant Yarber*
 
 B.
        Grant
        Yarber
 President
        and Chief Executive Officer
 August
        9,
        2006


This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002 and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
      Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### § 249.5 Storage of records.

Each carrier shall provide reasonable protection from damage by fire, floods, and other hazards for records subject to the provisions of this part.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 119 (Friday, June 20, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14607]

[[Page 35290]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 261

Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste

CFR Correction

0
In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 260 to 265, 
revised as of July 1, 2013, on page 37, in Sec.  261.3, paragraphs 
(a)(2)(v)(A) and (B) are reinstated to read as follows:

Sec.  261.3  Definition of hazardous waste.

    (a) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (v) * * *
    (A) The rebuttable presumption does not apply to metalworking oils/
fluids containing chlorinated paraffins, if they are processed, through 
a tolling agreement, to reclaim metalworking oils/fluids. The 
presumption does apply to metalworking oils/fluids if such oils/fluids 
are recycled in any other manner, or disposed.
    (B) The rebuttable presumption does not apply to used oils 
contaminated with chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) removed from refrigeration 
units where the CFCs are destined for reclamation. The rebuttable 
presumption does apply to used oils contaminated with CFCs that have 
been mixed with used oil from sources other than refrigeration units.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-14607 Filed 6-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10495]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-038]


NASA Advisory Council, Life and Microgravity Sciences and 
Applications Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Life 
and Microgravity Sciences and Applications Advisory Committee.

DATES: Thursday, May 18, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and Friday, May 19, 
2000, 8 a.m. to 12 Noon.

ADDRESSES: Center for Advanced Space Studies (CASS), 3600 Bay Area 
Blvd., 1045-Hess Room, Houston, TX 77058.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Stephen C. Davison, Code UG, 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 
202/358-0647.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

<bullet> Overview of JSC: Roles and Responsibilities
<bullet> JSC: The Challenges
<bullet> OLMSA Overview: 2001 Budget Status and Issues
<bullet> Workshop Results: NASA/NCI Collaboration on Bio-Molecular 
Systems and Technology
<bullet> Ad Hoc Committee Report on Selection and Balancing of Mission 
Payloads
<bullet> NRC Report: Institutional Arrangements for Space Station 
Research
<bullet> JSC Bioastronautics Program
<bullet> JSC Cellular Biotechnology
<bullet> Discussion of Committee Findings and Recommendations

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: April 24, 2000.
Matthew M. Crouch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-10495 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
EXHIBIT 5 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24535-5 Filed:06/12/23 Entered:06/12/23 21:36:46 Desc:

Exhibit AHG Ex 05 FOMB Statement Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24535-5 Filed:06/12/23 Entered:06/12/23 21:36:46 Desc:

Exhibit AHG Ex 05 FOMB Statement Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24535-5 Filed:06/12/23 Entered:06/12/23 21:36:46 Desc:

Exhibit AHG Ex 05 FOMB Statement Page 3 of 3