Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 2, 2000 / Notices 25483

* Session closed-exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C.

552b(c) (8) and (9).

a. Review of Significant Regulatory Actions

Pursuant to E.O. 12866; and

b. Stockholder Vote on Like Lending

Authority-Draft Proposed Regulation.

2. Other—Corporate Approvals

a. Revision of PS–63, ‘‘Policy Statement on

Farm Credit Institution Names’’ (NV 96–

22); and

b. Consolidation/Subsidiary Structure

Proposal from Farm Credit of Colorado

Springs, PCA/FLCA, Farm Credit

Services of Southeast Colorado, PCA/

FLCA; Farm Credit of Lamar FLCA; and

Monte Vista PCA.

Closed Session*

D. Report

1. OSMO Report.

Dated: April 27, 2000.

Nan P. Mitchem,

Acting Secretary, Farm Credit Administration

Board.

[FR Doc. 00–11011 Filed 4–28–00; 2:17 pm]

BILLING CODE 6705–01–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

April 25, 2000.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection(s), as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

Whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be

submitted on or before June 1, 2000. If

you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below as soon

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Judy

Boley, Federal Communications

Commission, Room 1–C804, 445 12th

Street, SW, DC 20554 or via the Internet

to jboley@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collection(s), contact Judy

Boley at 202–418–0214 or via the

Internet at jboley@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Control No.: 3060–0168.

Title: Section 43.43—Reports of

Proposed Changes in Depreciation

Rates.

Form No.: N/A.

Type of Review: Revision of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit.

Number of Respondents: 10.

Estimated Time Per Response: 4,000–

6,000 hours.

Frequency of Response:

Recordkeeping requirement, on

occasion reporting requirement.

Total Annual Burden: 40,000 hours.

Total Annual Cost: N/A.

Needs and Uses: In Report and Order,

CC Docket No. 98–91, the Commission

streamlined its depreciation

prescription process by permitting

summary filings and eliminating the

prescription of depreciation rates for

incumbent LECs, expanding the

prescribed range for the digital

switching plant account, and

eliminating the theoretical reserve study

requirement for mid-sized LECs. The

Commission also established a waiver

process whereby price cap incumbent

LECs can free themselves of

depreciation regulation. Also, see the

Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

in CC Docket No. 98–137 for additional

proposals soliciting comment to further

reduce burden placed on price cap

ILECs.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0395.

Title: The ARMIS USOA Report; The

ARMIS Service Quality Report; and the

ARMIS Infrastructure Report.

Report No.: FCC Reports 43–02, 43–

05, and 43–07.

Type of Review: Revision of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit.

Number of Respondents: 50.

Estimated Time Per Response: 5.7

hours to 550 hours.

Frequency of Response:

Recordkeeping requirement, on

occasion and annual reporting

requirements.

Total Annual Burden: 29,366 hours.

Total Annual Cost: N/A.

Needs and Uses: The USOA Report

provides the annual results of the

carriers’ activities for each account of

the Uniform System of Accounts. The

Service Quality Report provides service

quality information in the areas of

interexchange access service,

installation and repair intervals, local

service installation and repair intervals,

trunk blockage, and total switch

downtime for price cap companies. The

Infrastructure Report provides switch

deployment and capabilities data. The

Commission modified the requirements

for FCC Report 43–02 in CC Docket 99–

253, Report and Order. FCC Reports 43–

05 and 43–07 remain unchanged.

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–10890 Filed 5–1–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–U

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

April 26, 2000.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection(s), as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

Whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated