alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RITE RIE

ROE ROE RITE RIZE R4E RI5E
, - | 1 "
| i
Cc 26)
a. a ‘Steelfivad Falls
Jefferson County *
Deschutes County i a Crook County
Steam .
Roe
Norkiles onl croOKED,
] pci

Nal

Prineville

Prineville |

Nase a

242)
owe} @- [t=
Sisters Powell
45 wo
DESCHUTES ; ie |
NATIONAL 20)
gi
| OF Sita
FOREST
ng
%
|» ;
~~ - L
I\ eg :
po 3 SS
i North
5 ‘Millican.
S ZL Horse Ria Crook|County — |
= oRNAT ~ Deschutes’ County
ACEC South
Millican
ial
t DESCHUTES
/ Paulina cet
fk J Lake OQ RR)
x : Be i
Wickiup | 2
Reservoir NATIONAL
~ La Pine °
w 2 P a9
— Desens [County = Lt nn ne Ge
— —— ii La Pine g 5 g
z
@ G S12 FOREST
€ rf
(97) é ci

—

Legend

Planning Area

Highway

——— Road

Ey Urban Growth Boundary
Administered Lands

Ly Bureau of Land

Management
CL] National Forest
| National Grassland
[J Bureau of Reclamation
a State of Oregon
[} Private / Other

YA, 1'8 Mie Butter, Closed to

Mineral Material Mining

HERR] Closed to Surface Occupancy
and Mineral Material Mining

[J closed to Mineral Material
Mining and Mineral Leasing

BRR] Withdrawn from Locatable
Mineral Entry, Closed to
Mineral Material Mining 5.

Prineville
District

and Surface Occupancy
— Closed to Surface Occupancy

EEE] Residential

RMP Map 8: Minerals

N
w. E
S
0 5 10
———
MILES
5 0 5 10
KILOMETERS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
PRINEVILLE DISTRICT
2005

Upper Deschutes
Resource Management Plan

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy,
reliably, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use

with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This
information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product
was developed through digital means and may be updated without notification.

TMO5-04-02:MW. 082605
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

s0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

137898

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137898 COA: 284368 Wayne CC: 00-010334-01-FC DENNIS J. LITTLETON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 30, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### Wachter v. Little

*D. J. Snyder, Jr.,*and *Kunkle & Trescher,*for plaintiff.

*Smith, Best &/Horn,*for defendant.

*306January 30, 1956.

Bauer, J.,

— This ease came on before the court en banc on motion for judgment on the pleadings.

The testimony of the case shows as follows:

Plaintiff is suing defendant for damages to plaintiff’s automobile and for personal injuries arising out of an intersection collision between plaintiff’s and defendant’s cars.

Defendant in his answer set up as new matter that in a previous action at no. 617, August term, 1952, the present plaintiff, Thomas P. Wachter, was defendant in an action wherein Ralph Little, the present defendant, and his passenger, and Jerome Motor Company, owner of the automobile, were suing for their damages and injuries. In this action Ralph Little was severed as a plaintiff and added as an additional defendant. When Thomas P. Wachter added Ralph Little as an additional defendant, it was claimed that he was alone liable or, in the alternative, was jointly liable with Thomas P. Wachter for the damages as claimed by the passenger and the owner of the automobile. In this action no claim whatsoever was made hy Thomas P. Wachter upon the cause of action as set forth in the instant case. On March 26, 1954, the .■action at no. 617, August term, 1952, was settled, discontinued and ended of record and defendant in the instant case now claims that by this voluntary settlement of the case the cause of action of the present plaintiff against the present defendant was settled and was therefore res adjudicata.

We have gone into this matter very carefully and are of the opinion that the case of Simodejka v. Williams, 360 Pa. 332, does not apply to the case now before us. In the Simodejka v. Williams case there was a trial and a verdict, but in the instant case there was a voluntary discontinuance of the action by the present defendant and further, the only claim being made was *307the claim for damages by the present defendant and his passenger and the present defendant was added as additional defendant and must be assumed to have contributed to the final settlement of the action.

Nor does the case of Ramage v. Merchant, 87 D. & C. 531, apply because in that case the case had gone to trial and verdicts were returned. When a verdict is returned, of course the matter then becomes res ad judicata.

We are of the opinion that this case is controlled by the case of Luizer v. Heigel (No. 2), 88 D. & C. 378.

We are also of the opinion that unless Thomas P. Wachter and Ralph Little agreed between themselves that they should waive all claims against each other, any action on their part to secure a settlement of an annoying claim against both amounted either to a settlement of their mutual claims or to evidence of such a settlement.

And now, January 30, 1956, after argument and after due and careful consideration, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion for judgment on the pleadings be and the same herewith is refused.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report of Chelsea Oil and Gas, Ltd. (the
"Company")  on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  William  Petrie, Sr., Executive Chairman of the Company, and Jesse
Meidl,  Director  of  the  Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

   By:     /s/ William Petrie, Sr.
           ---------------------------------------------------
           William Petrie, Sr.
        Executive Chairman, Chelsea Oil and Gas, Ltd.

   By:     /s/ Jesse Meidl
           ---------------------------------------------------
           Jesse Meidl
           Director, Chelsea Oil and Gas, Ltd.


May 15, 2014
#### BARKER v. TENNESSEE COAL, IRON & R. R. CO.

(Decided April 20, 1915.)

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. C. B. Smith.

No counsel marked for appellant. Percy, Benners & Burr, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
# Official Journal C 223/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 223 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 623 July 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 223

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 623 July 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INTERINSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | Council |
| 2019/C 223/01 | Non-Binding Criteria for the application of Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — 18 June 2019 | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INTERINSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENTS

Council

2019/C 223/01

Non-Binding Criteria for the application of Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — 18 June 2019

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 223/02 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 223/02

Euro exchange rates

5

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 223/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9430 — Apollo Management/Vivat) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 223/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9430 — Apollo Management/Vivat) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 1216.300 Scope. ( a ) This subpart implements NEPA, setting forth NASA's policies and procedures for the early integration of environmental considerations into planning and decision making.
( b ) Through this subpart, NASA adopts the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508) and supplements those regulations with this subpart, for actions proposed by NASA that are subject to NEPA. This subpart and NASA's NEPA policy are available on NASA's Public Portal at *https://www.nasa.gov/emd/nepa .*
[77 FR 3103, Jan. 23, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 25499, Apr. 11, 2024]
###### Editorial Note on Part 741

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 741 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 741.209 Management official interlocks.

Any credit union which is insured pursuant to title II of the Act shall adhere to the requirements stated in part 711 of this chapter concerning management official interlocks, issued under the provisions of the Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act (12 U.S.C. 3201 *et seq.*).
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation (the “registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (a) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (a) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





/s/ Timothy C. Coxson





Timothy C. Coxson


Chief Financial Officer


March 12, 2013
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Elevation, in feet

1205

100 4

80-

60

20-4

Sea level—

Wi
Sec. 19, T. 37S., R. 2. E.

PLEISTOCENE
Terrace sand

Sec. 22, T. 35S., R. 25 E.

Sec. 32, T. 36S., R. OE. Sec. 10, T. 35S., R. 25.

Sec. 21, T. 365S., R. 25 E. Sec. 10, T. 36S., R. 25E. Sec. 34, T. 35S., R. 25 E.

PLIOCENE
Bone Valley formation

UPPER (?) TO MIDDLE MIOCENE
Unnamed sand and limestone

MIDOLE MIOCENE
Hawthorn formation

-20-1

9
SEVSE%

Sec. 34, T. 345., R25 E

/

8
SWYSWY

Sec. 15, T. 34 S.,R. 25 E.

Sec. 4, T. 345., R. 25 E. Sec. 33, T. 33S., R. 25 E.

© 900 1800 2700 cpm © 900 1800 cpm

CROSS SECTION 10, LAND-PEBBLE PHOSPHATE DISTRICT, FLORIDA

\ Sec. 21, T. 33'S.,\R. 251E.

© 900 1800 cpm

4

NWYSEY
Sec. 8, T. 335., R. 25 E.

900 1800,

Scale, in feet
o.

20

BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 25

Elevation, in feet

r!20
3
SWYANW,
See. 33, T. 325.,R. 5 E.
Q 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 cpm
L100
North
2 ! Ze
NEYSEY NWANWY ae
.. \ See 21, T. 3258., R. 25 E. Sec. 15, T. 325., R. 25E. 5&8
eet we
PRO TM ‘ © 900 1800 2700 cpm © 900 1800 2700 3600 cpm ae t-80
. ~ Ne
Fe . oS ieee
\ be wis
D 8s¢
Sef
age
coe ae
ot
r
ge
mS
32 60
arg
i
os
=z
+40
EXPLANATION
Lithologic symbols Other symbols surtace® 9005
ee) Lithologic correlation
sand) Stratigraphic correlation
Limits of aluminum ond
Organic material calcium phosphate zones +20
Ea Alternating symbols indicate two or
three of the above correlations
Iron cementation or follow the same line
staining; “hardpan’ y
at
Clay Section of core from which fossils
were identified
Phosphate nodules =
Sample number and interval sampled = : }-Sea level
ES Prue eancnaees Timed sommes ine anne
Calcareous clay Holes 3-16 from lot 2546 counts per minute
Limestone
No recovery, core lost
A mixture mbols indicates
‘a mixed lithology L 20

466352 © ~ 59 (In pocket)
<PAGE>


                                 EXHIBIT (10)(a)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



<PAGE>

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports (1)
dated February 14, 2003 with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements
and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company and (2) dated January 31,
2003 with respect to the subaccounts of Separate Account VA F, which are
available for investment by contract owners of Premier Asset Builder Variable
Annuity, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Registration
Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-62738) and related Prospectus of the Premier Asset
Builder Variable Annuity.

                                                         /s/Ernst & Young LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
April 25, 2003
§ 156.5 Project cost allowability. ( a ) A participating State shall not use State block grant funds for reimbursement of project costs that would not be eligible for reimbursement under a project grant administered by the FAA.
( b ) A participating State shall not use State block grant funds for reimbursement or funding of administrative costs incurred by the State pursuant to the State block grant program.
# C_2014395EN.01005701.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/57

---

Action brought on 10 September 2014 — International Gaming Projects v OHIM (BIG BINGO)

(Case T-663/14)

(2014/C 395/70)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: International Gaming Projects Ltd (Valletta, Malta) (represented by: M.D. Garayalde Niño, lawyer)

Respondent: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2014 in Case R 755/2014-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2014 in Case R 755/2014-1;

| — | approve for registration the Community trade mark application No 12 120 325‘BIG BINGO’ in Classes 9, 28 and 41; |
| --- | --- |

—

approve for registration the Community trade mark application No 12 120 325‘BIG BINGO’ in Classes 9, 28 and 41;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark applied for: The figurative mark with the word elements ‘BIG BINGO’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 28 and 41 — Community trade mark application No 12 120 325

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the mark applied for

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains  financial  information  extracted from Forstmann &
Company,  Inc.'s condensed consolidated financial statements for the thirty-nine
weeks ended August 1, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-01-1999
<CASH>                                         204
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,778
<INVENTORY>                                    23,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               54,507
<PP&E>                                         19,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 70,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          47,531
<BONDS>                                        265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       44
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   70,903
<SALES>                                        68,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               68,930
<CGS>                                          66,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  66,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               469
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                13,787
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 1,400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                314
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,873)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (3.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (3.38)



</TABLE>
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2783-1 Filed:03/22/18 Entered:03/22/18 11:39:35 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2783-1 Filed:03/22/18 Entered:03/22/18 11:39:35 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT E

Summary of FTI Consulting, Inc. Expenses 

Expense Type Amount

Airfare $ 21,671.17 

Lodging 2,579.53 

Transportation 2,131.19 

Working Meals 1,225.52 

Other 1,540.00 

Subtotal $ 29,147.41 

Less: Voluntary Reductions(1) (7,293.45)

Grand Total $ 21,853.96 

(1): In-office meals over $20.00 and out-of-office meals over $40 have been reduced to $20.00 and $40.00, respectively, while 

airfares and train fares have been reduced to coach-equivalent rates or the least expensive fare to comply with the Fee Examiner 

Guidelines. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2740-5 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 18:44:41 Desc:

Exhibit E Page 1 of 1
1

Tong, Stanley

From: Sang-Mi Lee <slee@aqmd.gov>

Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 11:14 AM

To: Tong, Stanley

Cc: Kalam Cheung

Subject: FW: Cal Portland Cement and Riverside Cement Permit Status

Hi Stan, 

Please see the email below regarding cement kiln operations used to be in the South coast air basin. We can discuss 

further details during a conf call next week. 

Thanks, 

Sang-Mi Lee, Ph.D. 

Program Supervisor 

Air Quality Modeling/Emissions Inventory 

South Coast Air Quality Management District 

21965 Copley Dr 

Diamond Bar, CA 92886 

Tel: 909-396-3169 

From: Kevin Orellana 

Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 11:00 AM 

To: Sang-Mi Lee 

Cc: Gary Quinn; Joe Cassmassi 

Subject: Cal Portland Cement and Riverside Cement Permit Status 

Cal Portland Cement: 

The permits for the two cement kilns have been inactivated. The facility still processes clinker 

from another facility, however, but no clinker production is occurring at this facility. 

Riverside Cement: 

All permits at this facility have been inactivated and the facility is officially shut down.
# CA2007073DE.01000101.xml

| 30.3.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 73/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 73/1

---

HINWEIS FÜR DIE LESER

HINWEIS FÜR DIE LESER

Image

---
Agenda for October 17, 2011 12866 OMB Briefing for Boilers and CISWI

1. Boiler MACT Major Changes a. Dioxin work practices b. PM now considered a combustion

- based pollutant c. Alternate TSM emission limits for solid fuels and gaseous fuels d. Alternate CO CEMS

- based emission limits for subcategories with CEMS data e. Emission limit changes i. New data ii. Data QA iii. Shifting of units between subcategories iv. 99% UPLfor CO instead of 99.9% f. Subcategory

changes i. Li ght and heav y liquids ii. Kiln

- dried biomass stokers and wet biomass stokers iii. Suspension burners, dutch ovens, pile burners g. Monitoring changes i. O2 trim sy stems instead of O2 CEMS ii. 30

- day

rolling averages for most parameter monitoring 2. Boiler Area Source Changes a. Initial compliance date for tune

- up b. Seasonal boiler subcategory c. Emission limit changes i. revised Hg limit for coal

- fired boilers (technical correction) ii. 99% UPLfor CO instead of 99.9% d. Numerous amendments to clarify applicability and implementation issues i. exemption for residential boilers located at institutions/commercial facilities ii. hot water definition includes hot water boilers 3. CI SWIChanges a. Review of dioxin/furan data and non

- detect methodology b. PM and other CAA 129 metals now considered combustion

- based pollutants for energy recovery unit s (ERUs) c. Emission limit changes i. New data ii. Data QA d. Subcategory

changes i. ERUs: liquid/gas and solids (coal/biomass) ii. Waste burning kilns: long kilns and preheater/precalciner kilns e. Monitoring changes i. Removal of ox ygen correction requirements for CO limits for ERUs during startup and shutdown and removal of CO CEMS requirements ii. Replacement of continuous particulate matter monitoring for ERUs greater than 250 MMBtu/hr design heat input capacity with continuous parameter monitoring sy stem requirements
#### § 135.61 General.

This subpart prescribes rules, in addition to those in part 91 of this chapter, that apply to operations under this part.