alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                 EXHIBIT 4.19(B)


                              CROSS-REFERENCE SHEET

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TIA Sections                                              Indenture Sections
<S>                                                       <C>
Section 310(a)..................................          7.10
           (b)..................................          7.10
Section 311(a)..................................          7.11
           (b)..................................          7.11
Section 312(a)..................................          2.06
           (b)..................................          12.03
           (c)..................................          12.03
Section 313(a)..................................          7.06
           (b)..................................          7.06; 10.03(d)
           (c)..................................          7.06
           (d)..................................          7.06
Section 314(a)..................................          4.02; 4.09
           (b)..................................          10.02
           (c)..................................          12.04
           (d)..................................          10.03(d); 10.04; 10.05
           (e)..................................          12.05
Section 315(a)..................................          7.01(b)
           (b)..................................          7.05
           (c)..................................          7.01(a)
           (d)..................................          7.01(c)
           (e)..................................          6.11
Section 316(a)(1)(A)............................          6.05; 7.02(f)
           (a)(1)(B)............................          6.04
           (b)..................................          6.07
           (c)..................................          9.04(b)
Section 317(a)(1)...............................          6.08
           (a)(2)...............................          6.09
           (b)..................................          2.05
Section 318(a)..................................          12.01
</TABLE>


Note: The Cross-Reference Sheet shall not for any purpose be deemed to be a
      part of the Indenture.
§ 121.623 Alternate airport for destination: IFR or over-the-top: Supplemental operations. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each person releasing an aircraft for operation under IFR or over-the-top shall list at least one alternate airport for each destination airport in the flight release.
( b ) An alternate airport need not be designated for IFR or over-the-top operations where the aircraft carries enough fuel to meet the requirements of §§ 121.643 and 121.645 for flights outside the 48 contiguous States and the District of Columbia over routes without an available alternate airport for a particular airport of destination.
( c ) For the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the weather requirements at the alternate airport must meet the requirements of the certificate holder's operations specifications.
( d ) No person may release a flight unless he lists each required alternate airport in the flight release.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19222, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2614, Jan. 26, 1996]
UTi Worldwide Inc.



 



EXHIBIT 10.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-58832, 333-58836, and 333-58840 of UTi Worldwide Inc. on Form S-8 of our
report dated April 2, 2003 (April 30, 2003 as to Note 14) appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 20-F of UTi Worldwide Inc. for the year ended January 31,
2003.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Los Angeles, California


May 2, 2003
§ 158.45 Collection of PFC's on tickets issued in the U.S. ( a ) On and after the charge effective date, tickets issued in the U.S. shall include the required PFC except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section. ( 1 ) Issuing carriers shall be responsible for all funds from time of collection to remittance.
( 2 ) The appropriate charge is the PFC in effect at the time the ticket is issued.
( 3 ) Issuing carriers and their agents shall collect PFCs based on the itinerary at the time of issuance. ( i ) Any change in itinerary initiated by a passenger that requires an adjustment to the amount paid by the passenger is subject to collection or refund of the PFC as appropriate.
( ii ) Failure to travel on a nonrefundable or expired ticket is not a change in itinerary. If the ticket purchaser is not permitted any fare refund on the unused ticket, the ticket purchaser is not permitted a refund of any PFC associated with that ticket.
( b ) Issuing carriers and their agents shall note as a separate item on each air travel ticket upon which a PFC is shown, the total amount of PFC's paid by the passenger and the airports for which the PFC's are collected.
( c ) For each one-way trip shown on the complete itinerary of an air travel ticket, issuing air carriers and their agents shall collect a PFC from a passenger only for the first two airports where PFC's are imposed. For each round trip, a PFC shall be collected only for enplanements at the first two enplaning airports and the last two enplaning airports where PFC's are imposed.
( d ) In addition to the restriction in paragraph (c) of this section, issuing carriers and their agents shall not collect PFC's from a passenger covered by any of the other limitations described in § 158.9(a).
( e ) Collected PFC's shall be distributed as noted on the air travel ticket.
( f ) Issuing carriers and their agents shall stop collecting the PFC's on the charge expiration date stated in a notice from the public agency, or as required by the Administrator.
[Doc. No. 26385, 56 FR 24278, May 29, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 158-2, 65 FR 34542, May 30, 2000; Amdt. 158-4, 72 FR 28849, May 23, 2007]
§ 23.2410 Powerplant installation hazard assessment. The applicant must assess each powerplant separately and in relation to other airplane systems and installations to show that any hazard resulting from the likely failure of any powerplant system, component, or accessory will not— ( a ) Prevent continued safe flight and landing or, if continued safe flight and landing cannot be ensured, the hazard has been minimized;
( b ) Cause serious injury that may be avoided; and
( c ) Require immediate action by any crewmember for continued operation of any remaining powerplant system.
## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 28 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

LORNA L. McCARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. TOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-3040

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Kansas (D.C. No. 94-CV-2383)

Submitted on the briefs: Jeffrey L. Baxter, of Chapman, Waters & Baxter, of Leavenworth, Kansas, for the appellant. Jackie N. Williams, United States Attorney, and Janice Miller Karlin, Assistant United States Attorney, State of Kansas, for the appellee.
Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges. BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.-2-

Plaintiff Lorna McCarter appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Togo West, Jr., Secretary of the Army, on her claims of sex-based and disability-based employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act. We review the district court's decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Wolf v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America , 50 F.3d 793, 796 (10th Cir. 1995). After careful examination of the record, we conclude the analysis and conclusions set forth in the district court's memorandum and order granting summary judgment are correct and that plaintiff's challenge to the decision lacks merit. We therefore adopt the district court's memorandum and order, McCarter v. West , 910 F. Supp. 519 (D. Kan. 1995), as the opinion of this court. See Herrera v. International Union , 73 F.3d 1056, 1057 (10th Cir. 1996) (adopting district court's opinion as opinion of court of appeals). Defendant's motion to strike portions of plaintiff's appendix is GRANTED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 25.1163 Powerplant accessories. ( a ) Each engine mounted accessory must— ( 1 ) Be approved for mounting on the engine involved;
( 2 ) Use the provisions on the engine for mounting; and
( 3 ) Be sealed to prevent contamination of the engine oil system and the accessory system.
( b ) Electrical equipment subject to arcing or sparking must be installed to minimize the probability of contact with any flammable fluids or vapors that might be present in a free state.
( c ) If continued rotation of an engine-driven cabin supercharger or of any remote accessory driven by the engine is hazardous if malfunctioning occurs, there must be means to prevent rotation without interfering with the continued operation of the engine.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-57, 49 FR 6849, Feb. 23, 1984]
§ 137.3 Definition of terms. For the purposes of this part— *Agricultural aircraft operation* means the operation of an aircraft for the purpose of ( 1 ) dispensing any economic poison,
( 2 ) dispensing any other substance intended for plant nourishment, soil treatment, propagation of plant life, or pest control, or
( 3 ) engaging in dispensing activities directly affecting agriculture, horticulture, or forest preservation, but not including the dispensing of live insects.
*Economic poison* means ( 1 ) any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any insects, rodents, nematodes, fungi, weeds, and other forms of plant or animal life or viruses, except viruses on or in living man or other animals, which the Secretary of Agriculture shall declare to be a pest, and
( 2 ) any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant regulator, defoliant or desiccant.
[Doc. No. 1464, 30 FR 8106, June 24, 1965, as amended by Amdt. 137-3, 33 FR 9601, July 2, 1968]
#### George E. Wood Lumber Company, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. Addie P. Gipson, *Defendant in Error.*

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam

— From the evidence the jury could reasonably have found that the plaintiff’s decedent was on the morning of the injury sent from other work to aid in assortin-g logs at the foot of the ramp; that he was inexperienced and was not advised by the master of the risks and dangers of the employment just assigned to him; that when he arrived at the ramp he was told of the danger of going over it; that after assisting in assorting logs at the foot of the ramp he was engaged with two others in rolling other logs from the ramp into the water below to be assorted; that he was told not to go on the logs as they might roll; that while he was standing on logs he was engaged in rolling, other logs from above not being secure began to roll and rapidly rolled down and injured him before he had time or opportunity to escape after those who were working with him called to him to get out of the way of the logs rapidly rolling from a pile six or more feet above him; that the master was negligent in not making the logs above secure so they would not roll *324«down; that though the decendent was notified that there was danger he was inexperienced and did not realize the risks he was taking and that while he was engaged in the work assigned to him acting with ordinary care, he was unable to escape an injury caused proximately by the -master’s negligence in not making the logs above him ¡secure on the ramps, it being clearly established that the ramps wer in bad condition and that the decedent was not fully informed of its condition or of its dangers, and that the injury was caused by the logs rolling from above him and not by the rolling of the logs he was handling.

Such a finding being lawfully deducible from the evidence the liability attaches and it cannot be said as matter of law that the verdict is not supported by the evidence, its conflicts and weight having been determined by the jury and affirmed by the trial court in denying a motion for a new trial, one ground of which being the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

A rehearing is denied.

Whitfield, C. J., and Taylor, Shackleford, Cockrell, and IIocker, J. J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3791 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3791

  To provide that no automatic pay adjustment for Members of Congress 
 shall be made in the year following a fiscal year in which there is a 
                        Federal budget deficit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2004

Mr. Stearns (for himself, Mr. Hall, Mr. Flake, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Deal of 
 Georgia, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Paul, and Mr. Franks of Arizona) introduced 
   the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that no automatic pay adjustment for Members of Congress 
 shall be made in the year following a fiscal year in which there is a 
                        Federal budget deficit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deficit Accountability Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. EFFECT OF A BUDGET DEFICIT.

    Section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 
U.S.C. 31) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ``Subject to 
        subparagraph (B),'' and inserting ``Subject to subparagraph (B) 
        and paragraph (3),''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) An adjustment under paragraph (2) otherwise scheduled to take 
effect in a calendar year shall not be made if, as determined by the 
Office of Management and Budget, there was a deficit (as defined by 
section 3 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 
1974) in the preceding fiscal year.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1264.134 The record. ( a ) The hearing will be recorded and transcribed. Transcripts may be obtained following the hearing from the presiding officer at a cost not to exceed the actual cost of duplication.
( b ) The transcript of testimony, exhibits, and other evidence admitted at the hearing, and all papers and requests filed in the proceeding constitute the record for the decision by the presiding officer and the authority head.
( c ) The record may be inspected and copied (upon payment of a reasonable fee) by anyone, unless otherwise ordered by the presiding officer pursuant to § 1264.123.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 11, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00185

- CR

Kevin Mikel BRA SHEARS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR7982B

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding



### CORRECTED ORDER

Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California

, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal.

Counsel h as informed the appellant of his right to file his own brief and provided appellant with

a form motion for requesting the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— Sa n Antonio 1997, no

pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

If the appellant desires to request the appellate record, he must file the motion requesting

the record within ten days from the date of this order. I f the appellant desires to file a pro se

brief, he must do so within thirty days from the date of this order. See Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177

n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty

days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that

the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further

order of the court.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, C hief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of August, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estra da

Chief Deputy Clerk
§ 19-8.6 Dissemination. Any Ticket that is submitted that involves a Reporting Carrier and an International Point providing service in whole or in part under this part are generally not available to the Department, the U.S. carriers, or U.S. interests. Therefore, because of the damaging competitive impact on U.S. carriers and the adverse effect upon the public interest that would result from unilateral disclosure of international ticket survey data that involves a Reporting Carrier, the Department will not disclose international ticket data that involves a Reporting Carrier in the Passenger Origin-Destination Survey to citizens or non-citizens except: ( a ) To an air carrier directly participating in and contributing input data to the Survey under this part or to a legal or consulting firm designated by a directly participating air carrier to use on its behalf and in connection with a specific assignment by such carrier;
( b ) To parties to any proceeding before the Department to the extent that such data are relevant and material to the issues in the proceeding upon a determination to this effect by the Administrative Law Judge or by the Department's decision-maker. Any data to which access is granted pursuant to this section may be introduced into evidence subject to the normal rules of admissibility of evidence;
( c ) To agencies and other components of the U.S. Government;
( d ) To other persons upon a showing that the release of the data will serve specifically identified needs of U.S. users which are consistent with U.S. interests; and
( e ) To foreign governments and foreign users as provided in formal reciprocal arrangements between the foreign and U.S. Governments for the exchange of comparable O&D data.
# Official Journal C 208/25 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 208 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4825 August 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 208

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4825 August 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 208/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 208/2 | Summary of notifications received by the Commission until 31 December 2004 pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 2 |
| 2005/C 208/3 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 12 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 208/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 208/2

Summary of notifications received by the Commission until 31 December 2004 pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council

2

2005/C 208/3

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

12

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 25.791 Passenger information signs and placards. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 68099 , Aug. 23, 2024.
( a ) If smoking is to be prohibited, there must be at least one placard so stating that is legible to each person seated in the cabin. If smoking is to be allowed, and if the crew compartment is separated from the passenger compartment, there must be at least one sign notifying when smoking is prohibited. Signs which notify when smoking is prohibited must be operable by a member of the flightcrew and, when illuminated, must be legible under all probable conditions of cabin illumination to each person seated in the cabin.
( b ) Signs that notify when seat belts should be fastened and that are installed to comply with the operating rules of this chapter must be operable by a member of the flightcrew and, when illuminated, must be legible under all probable conditions of cabin illumination to each person seated in the cabin.
( c ) A placard must be located on or adjacent to the door of each receptacle used for the disposal of flammable waste materials to indicate that use of the receptacle for disposal of cigarettes, etc., is prohibited.
( d ) Lavatories must have “No Smoking” or “No Smoking in Lavatory” placards conspicuously located on or adjacent to each side of the entry door.
( e ) Symbols that clearly express the intent of the sign or placard may be used in lieu of letters.
[Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29780, July 20, 1990]
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
Ralph C. Guild, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 15, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    RALPH C. GUILD                            
|                      |  |  |  | Ralph C. Guild                                   
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, William J. McEntee, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 15, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    WILLIAM J. MCENTEE,
JR.                   
|                      |  |  |  | William J. McEntee, Jr.                          
|                      |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer