alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chapter 2: Alternatives and Proposed Action

.5. Fish & Wildlife Service
ALTERNATIVE A/"No Action"
Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge

Restoration Map

Resourca Management Zones
Xeric Tallgrass Prairie

| Riparian Corridar and Wetlands
Mixed Prairie Grasslands

‘Targeted Restoration Areas
= Removed & Revegetated Road”
+ Restored Stream Crossing

Other Areas:

©) ‘DOE Retained Area

% Permitted Mining Uso

=~ Unpaved Maintenance Road
{retained for administrative,
‘easement & fire access)

--- Existing Road (not maintained or
actively restored)

“Oniy primary road corridors within the Rock
Greek Reserve would be removed and
revegetated

Visitor Use Map

Public Uses
Public access is by arrangement
only and limited to guided tours

Public Use
No public use facility
development

Other Facilities
9 Refuge Entrance
Service Refuge Lands
1) Area Retained by DOE
i} Rock Creek Reserve (established
by DOE in 1999 to recognize its
biological significance. It was
later expanded to 1,800 acres)

Figure no. 4

16 Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge
§ 107.37 Operation near aircraft; right-of-way rules. ( a ) Each small unmanned aircraft must yield the right of way to all aircraft, airborne vehicles, and launch and reentry vehicles. Yielding the right of way means that the small unmanned aircraft must give way to the aircraft or vehicle and may not pass over, under, or ahead of it unless well clear.
( b ) No person may operate a small unmanned aircraft so close to another aircraft as to create a collision hazard.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.221 Class I provisional airworthiness certificates. ( a ) Except as provided in § 21.225, an applicant is entitled to a Class I provisional airworthiness certificate for an aircraft for which a Class I provisional type certificate has been issued if— ( 1 ) He meets the eligibility requirements of § 21.213 and he complies with this section; and
( 2 ) The FAA finds that there is no feature, characteristic or condition of the aircraft that would make the aircraft unsafe when operated in accordance with the limitations established in §§ 21.81(e) and 91.317 of this subchapter.
( b ) The manufacturer must hold a provisional type certificate for the aircraft.
( c ) The manufacturer must submit a statement that the aircraft conforms to the type design corresponding to the provisional type certificate and has been found by him to be in safe operating condition under all applicable limitations.
( d ) The aircraft must be flown at least five hours by the manufacturer.
( e ) The aircraft must be supplied with a provisional aircraft flight manual or other document and appropriate placards containing the limitations established by §§ 21.81(e) and 91.317.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14571, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-66, 54 FR 34329, Aug. 18, 1989]
§ 25.751 Main float buoyancy. Each main float must have— ( a ) A buoyancy of 80 percent in excess of that required to support the maximum weight of the seaplane or amphibian in fresh water; and
( b ) Not less than five watertight compartments approximately equal in volume.
§ 142.13 Management and personnel requirements. An applicant for a training center certificate must show that— ( a ) For each proposed curriculum, the training center has, and shall maintain, a sufficient number of instructors who are qualified in accordance with subpart C of this part to perform the duties to which they are assigned;
( b ) The training center has designated, and shall maintain, a sufficient number of approved evaluators to provide required checks and tests to graduation candidates within 7 calendar days of training completion for any curriculum leading to airman certificates or ratings, or both;
( c ) The training center has, and shall maintain, a sufficient number of management personnel who are qualified and competent to perform required duties; and
( d ) A management representative, and all personnel who are designated by the training center to conduct direct student training, are able to understand, read, write, and fluently speak the English language.
§ 243.13 Filing requirements. ( a ) Each covered airline that operates one or more covered flight segments shall file with the U.S. Department of Transportation a brief statement summarizing how it will collect the passenger manifest information required by this part and transmit the information to the Department of State following an aviation disaster. This description shall include a contact at the covered airline, available at any time the covered airline is operating a covered flight segment, who can be consulted concerning information gathered pursuant to this part.
( b ) Each covered airline shall file any contact change as well as a description of any significant change in its means of collecting or transmitting manifest information on or before the date the change is made.
( c ) All filings under this section should be submitted to OST Docket 98-3305, Dockets Management Facility (M-90) U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. The statement shall be filed prior to the date a covered airline operates a covered flight segment.
[Docket No. OST-95-950, 63 FR 8280, Feb. 18, 1998, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15932, Apr. 16, 2019 ]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.7


                             [BANK ONE LETTERHEAD]


June 1, 2001

Leonard Tylka
Chief Financial Officer
Childtime Childcare, Inc.
38345 West 10 Mile Road
Suite 100
Farmington Hills, MI 48335-2883

Dear Len:

You have informed us that Childtime Childcare, Inc. ("Childtime") is in default
of the Fixed Charge Ratio under the Credit Agreement amoung Childtime and Bank
One, Michigan (formerly known as NBD Bank). This letter serves to waive the
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio through June 1, 2001.  Bank One, Michigan
maintains all other rights and remedies and this waiver shall not be construed
as an indication of our willingness to waive this or any other covenant in the
future.  Please give me a call if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

/s/ Richard Ellis
Richard C. Ellis
DPR MODIFIED PROMESA B2500A (Form 2500A) (06/17) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTIO RICO

In re , ) Case No. 

Debtors ) 

) Chapter

) 

) 

Plaintiff ) 

) 

v. ) Adv. Proc. No. 

)

) 

Defendant ) 

SUMMONS IN AN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING

YOU ARE SUMMONED and required to file a motion or answer to the complaint which is 

attached to this summons with the clerk of the district court within 30 days after the date of issuance of 

this summons, except that the United States and its officers and agencies shall file a motion or answer 

to the complaint within 35 days. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff`s 

attorney, whose name and address are:

If you make a motion, your time to answer is governed by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012. 

If you fail to respond to this summons, your failure will be deemed to be your consent to 

entry of a judgment by the district court and judgment by default may be taken against you for the 

relief demanded in the complaint.

Date:

FRANCES RIOS DE MORAN, ESQ.

CLERK OF COURT

________________________________________

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

To: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD 

FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3435-16 Filed:07/05/18 Entered:07/05/18 13:08:30 Desc:

Summons Ana J. Matosantos Page 1 of 2
DPR MODIFIED PROMESA B2500A (Form 2500A) (06/17)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, (name), certify that service of this summons and a copy of 

the complaint was made (date) by:

 Mail service: Regular, first class United States mail, postage fully pre-paid, addressed

to:

 Personal Service: By leaving the process with the defendant or with an officer or agent

of defendant at:

 Residence Service: By leaving the process with the following adult at:

 Certified Mail Service on an Insured Depository Institution: By sending the process by

certified mail addressed to the following officer of the defendant at:

 Publication: The defendant was served as follows: [Describe briefly]

 State Law: The defendant was served pursuant to the laws of the State of , as 

follows: [Describe briefly]

If service was made by personal service, by residence service, or pursuant to state law, I further 

certify that I am, and at all times during the service of process was, not less than 18 years of age and 

not a party to the matter concerning which service of process was made.

Under penalty of perjury, I declare that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date Signature 

Print Name: 

Business Address:

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3435-16 Filed:07/05/18 Entered:07/05/18 13:08:30 Desc:

Summons Ana J. Matosantos Page 2 of 2
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-09-00382-CV

IN RE DIXEY EVANS

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed December 16, 2009

[OT06]
Chapter 3: Affected Environment

US Fish & Wildlife Service

Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge
Jefferson County, CO

ef )
“i Bovdder County
—_/ - ens /—-
‘National Wind ‘ -
Tehvlogy Center

Wildlife Resources a as 1 Mile A

Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse Protection Area (DOE designation) December 2003
Observed Raptor Nest Site (1991-1988)
Concentration Area (1987-2001)

failed Prairie Dog Colony (COOW 2000)

Coyote Den (Active in 2002)

Coyote Den (1991-2001)

DOE Retained Area (Subject to Change}

|

HE Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Colony (Active in2003)
e
@

Figure no. 16

Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and EIS 109
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10476

Summary Calendar

 

TRAVIS RIPLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN J. CALLAHAN,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:93-CV-495-A

- - - - - - - - - -

March 28, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Travis Ripley appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. 

Ripley’s attorney did not timely present the new evidence which

this court found relevant to the determination whether Ripley is

disabled; instead, counsel filed the evidence, without

explanation or argument, in an exhibit to his objections to the

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Consequently, the
district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the

Commissioner’s failure to request a remand for consideration of

the new evidence was substantially justified. Bazaldua v. INS,

776 F.2d 1266, 1269 (1985). We also find no abuse of discretion

in the district court’s rejection of Ripley’s arguments that an

award of attorney fees is required because of the Administrative

Law Judge’s failure to develop the record or consider Ripley’s

testimony concerning the limitations he experienced due to his

back problems.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 248.1 Applicability.

The requirements of this part shall be applicable to all air carriers subject to the requirements of part 241 of this subchapter.
§ 25.843 Tests for pressurized cabins. ( a ) *Strength test.* The complete pressurized cabin, including doors, windows, and valves, must be tested as a pressure vessel for the pressure differential specified in § 25.365(d).
( b ) *Functional tests.* The following functional tests must be performed: ( 1 ) Tests of the functioning and capacity of the positive and negative pressure differential valves, and of the emergency release valve, to stimulate the effects of closed regulator valves.
( 2 ) Tests of the pressurization system to show proper functioning under each possible condition of pressure, temperature, and moisture, up to the maximum altitude for which certification is requested.
( 3 ) Flight tests, to show the performance of the pressure supply, pressure and flow regulators, indicators, and warning signals, in steady and stepped climbs and descents at rates corresponding to the maximum attainable within the operating limitations of the airplane, up to the maximum altitude for which certification is requested.
( 4 ) Tests of each door and emergency exit, to show that they operate properly after being subjected to the flight tests prescribed in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
#### CITY OF TUSCALOOSA v. BRADFORD.

(Decided May 11, 1915.

Rehearing denied June 30, 1915.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

Brown & Ward, and Oliver, Verner & Rice, for appellant. Clarkson & Morrisette, for appellee.

Pelham, P. J.

Reversed and remanded on authority of *City of Tuscaloosa v. Hill, infra,*69 South. 486.
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Element 21 Golf Company (formerly BRL
      Holdings, Inc.) (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
      31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, we, Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer, and
      John Grippo, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.







Date:
                May 15, 2008
            
            By:  /s/
                Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D.President
                and DirectorDate:
                May 15, 2008
            
            By:  /s/
                John GrippoChief
                Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7675

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MCKINLEY EARL MORANT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cr-00307-CMC-1; 

3:20-cv-02449-CMC)

Submitted: February 18, 2021 Decided: February 23, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

McKinley Earl Morant, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

McKinley Morant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Morant has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

                    Section 30.13 of the Department of Health and Human Services' claims collection regulations (45 CFR part 30) provides that the Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest as fixed by the Secretary of the Treasury after taking into consideration private consumer rates of interest prevailing on the date that HHS becomes entitled to recovery. The rate generally cannot be lower than the Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable rate determined from the “Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with Range of Maturities.” This rate may be revised quarterly by the Secretary of the Treasury and shall be published quarterly by the Department of Health and Human Services in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

                    The Secretary of the Treasury has certified a rate of 13                    3/4                    % for the quarter ended March 31, 2000. This interest rate will remain in effect until such time as the Secretary of the Treasury notifies HHS of any change.                

Dated: April 26, 2000.

George Strader,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Finance.

[FR Doc. 00-11018 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 SECTION 302 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND
ACCOUNTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS I, Lawrence R. Kuhnert, the Vice Chairman of Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer), President and Chief Operating Officer of Arcadia Resources, Inc., certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Arcadia Resources, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    [omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];(c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Dated: February 14, 2005
    /s/ Lawrence R. KuhnertLawrence R. KuhnertVice Chairman of Finance (Principal
     Financial and Accounting Officer),
     President and Chief Operating Officer
180222 AMBAC RULE 2004 MAG REF VERSION FEBRUARY 22, 2018 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

----------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: PROMESA 

 Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered) 

et al., 

 Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x 

ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 Ambac Assurance Corporation’s Motion for Entry of Order Authorizing 

Discovery Under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 filed on November 28, 2017 (case no. 17-3283, docket 

entry no. 1873; case no. 17-3284, docket entry no. 240) in the above-captioned Title III 

proceeding is referred to Magistrate Judge Judith Dein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 22, 2018 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

 United States District Judge 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation 

(“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 

17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement 

System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 

17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric 

Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to 

software limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2575 Filed:02/22/18 Entered:02/22/18 15:27:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1