AP-42 Section Reference 

# AC Report Sect. Reference 

# 9 5 P O910
~~~~S rArE a_ 1_o17 

# ~2~ 

# cK 

# coM

~ 

# An y

-I

- E S 

# r pAiZ 6 

## -St 

## ., t" , S 

# 44TE. , PaVCM&A 5o /9959780 South 5200 West West Jordan, Utah 84088

(801) 280-5200 

### (800)233-8654 FAX (801) 280-5220 

# ri INTERSTATE [3RICK

Date: 

### 8/13/96 Brian Shrager Environmental Engineer Midwest Research Institute Suite 350 401 Harison Oaks Boulevard Cary, NC 27513-2412


### RE: Information you requested in your letter of July 18, 1996 (includes: this letter, summary sheet, 2 test reports)• 

### Dear Mr. Shrager. Attached please find the information you requested. Interstate Brick has two scrubbers in operation. A Medium efficiency wet scrubber and a high efficiency wet scrubber. The medium efficiency scrubber is attached to a top fired, 48 wide, 16 high, natural gas fired tunnel kiln (kiln no. 4). The high efficiency wet scrubber is attached to a top fired, 36 wide, 14 high, top fired, natural gas fired tunnel kiln (kiln no. 3). Both scrubbers use a soda ash/water solution as the reagent. The medium efficiency scrubber consists of an rectangular, arched roofed, structure which looks similar to a greenhouse except that it is made of face brick. The gas follows a U-shaped path up one end and back down the other. A center separation wall in the middle and several baflle walls add residence time inside the scrubber. The gas is contacted by spray nozzels as it passes through the scrubber. The gasses then exit up an 80 ft. brick stack. The soda ash water solution is recirculated between the scrubber and a pond. Soda ash is added to the pond at a rate sufficient to hold pH 7. The high efficiency scrubber is a FRP (fiberglass reinforced plastic) packed tower type with a 7' diameter, 11' long, horizontal, co-current quench section lined with carbon brick attached to it. The gas travels horizontally through the quench and is cooled from approximately 480 down to 130 deg. F. The gas then flows upwards through a 12' diameter vessel filled with 5' of random dump packing, thorough a fixed blade chevron style demister. The vessal then reduces down to a 5 ft. diameter, 30 ft. high stack. The scrubber and stack resemble a coke bottle in shape with an approximate height of 60'. The bottom of the scrubber vessal holds a reservoir of reagent that is recirculated through the pacldng and quench section. A soda ash water solution is added to the reservoir to neutralize pH.
Please do not use the test results for line 3 kiln inlet to scrubber done December 1994 because the flow rate was later found to have been in error. Please contact me if you have and further questions. Sincerely,



# ~ John Hewitt, process engineer

CLAY DIVISION 

### H.C. MUDDOX: 4875 Bradshaw Road • Sacramento, CA 95827 •(800) 776-1244 • FAX (916) 362-9182 INTERSTATE BRICK: 9780 South 5200 West • West Jordan, Utah 84088 •(800) 233-8654 • FAX (801) 280-5220 GLADDING, McBEAN: 601 7th Street • P.O. Box 97 • Lincoln, CA 95648 9(800) 776-1133 • FAX (916) 645-1723

a divislon of PACIFIC C0A5T

building products 

# 3

### "EMISSIONS SURVEY FOR SOZ, NO x , CO, HF AND PM 10 EMISSIONS CONDUCTED ON INTERSTATE BRICK COMPANY'S KILN NO. 3 SCRUBBER,

LOCATED IN WEST JORDAN, UTAH"



# imr.

~ 

# zarm V. Brent Benson

J. Paul Benson

Rick P. Hawkins

Todd B. Benson Brian Briggs JD Schiller Brent Strong

October 31, 1995

November 30, 1995



### pre pargd for; 

### Mr. John Hewitt, Plant Manager Interstate Brick Company 9780 South 5200 West West Jordan, Utah 84088-5689 Pre oared

bv: 

### Mr. V. Brent Benson, Technical Director American Environmental Testing, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

C 

## ~ ;L—

### Results of Stack Testing and percent sulfur and fluoride in clay mixes:

Kiln no. 4 Tested December 1994 inlet (lb/hr.) outlet (lb/hr.) efficiency PM10 not tested 8.75 n/a HF not tested 2.12 S02 68.68 

### 11.82 82.7% NOx 

### 2.86 2.77 -.03% CO not tested not tested n/a
Kiln no. 3 Tested November 1995 inlet (lb/hr. ) outlet. (lb/hr. ) efficiency PM10 1.53 1.61 -0.05% HF 29.25 0.02 99.93% S02 25.8 0.07 99.72% NOx 

### 10.5 2.76 73.7 0 /o 

### CO 

### 36.14 32.22 n/a

°r6 of °r6 sulfur in % flouride weighted weighted Mix production mix in mix % sulfur °r6 flouride A 23.3% 0.0575°i6 0.1309°r6 0.0041 

### % 0.0093°i6 B 18.7% 0.0220% 0.0946% 0.0016% 0.0067% C 9.6% 0.0460% 0.0872% 0.0033% 0.0062% D 9.3°i6 0.1580°i6 0.0765°r6 0.0112°i6 0.0054°i6 E 9.0% 0.1650°/b 0.1003% 0.0117°/6 0.0071 

### % F 8.3°i6 0.1560°i6 0.0916% 0.0111 °/6 0.0065% G 7.1 

### % 0.0889% 0.1000% 0.0063°r6 0.0071 

### % H 6.1 

### % 0.0780°/6 0.0684°r6 0.005596 0.0049% 1 2.7% 0.1340°r6 0.1252°r6 0.0095°r6 0.0089% J 2.5% 0.0320% 0.1261 

### % 0.0023% 0.0090% K 1.3% 0.0390% 0.0985% 0.0028% 0.0070°r6 L 0.9% 0.1450% 0.1113% 0.0103% 0.0079% M 0.7% 0.0320% 0.0682% 0.0023% 0.0048°r6 N 0.6% 1 0.0660% 1 0.1 

## 2N% 1 0.0047% 0.0086% weighted % sulfur and flouride in brick 0-0866% 0.0994%

4-r/-~•L~~ 

## L• • - • • -

AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING COMPANY, INC. (AET) certifies: 

### 1. That every effort was made to obtain accurate and representative data within the guidelines established by: 

### A The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 40, Chapter I, Part 60, Appendix "A", Methods 1-5 inclusive, Method 6C, Method 7E, Method 9, Method 10, Method 138 and Method 201A/202. B. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems". 

### 2. AII of sampling and analysis performed for the compliance test reported herein were carried out by myself or under my supervision. 

### 3. The results obtained are accurate and authentic.


# /2

~ 

# lo '14 ~ Rick P. Hawkins Method 201 A Crew Supervisor CEM Crew Supervisor



### I have reviewed all testing details and methods on which the results of this test are based. I find them to be accurate within the limits of the applicable methods.

V. Brent Benson Technical Director



# ~

### TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 .0 Introduction 1 .1 Test Purpose

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

### 1 2.0 Summary of Results
2.1 PM 10

Emissions

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

### 2 2.1 .1 Table of PM 1 Q Emissions Summary

- 

### Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet

. . . . . . . . . . . 

### 3 2.1

. 

### 2 Table of PM 1 0 Emissions Summary

- 

### Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet.

. . . . . . . . . . 

### 3
2.2 S0

2 Emissions

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

### 4 2. 2.1 S02 Emissions Summary Table

- 

### Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet

. . . . . . . . . . . 

### 4 2. 2. 2 S02 Emissions Summary Table

- 

### Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet.

. . . . . . . . . . 

### 4
2. 3 NO x Emissions

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

### 5 2. 3.1 NO x Emissions Summary Table

- 

### Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet

. . . . . . . . . . 

### 5 2. 3. 2 NOx Emissions Summary Table

- 

### Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet

. . . . . . . . . . 

### 5
2.4 Visible Emissions Opacity

. . . . . . . . . . . . 

### 6 2.4.1 Summary Table of Visible Emissions

- 

### Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet

. . . . . . . . . . . 

### 6 2.4.2 Summary Table of Visible Emissions

- 

### Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet

. . . . . . . . . . 

### 6
2.5 HF Emissions

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

### 7 2.5.1 HF Emissions Summary Table

- 

### Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet

. . . . . . . . . . . 

### 7 2.5.2 HF Emissions Summary Table

- 

### Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet

. . . . . . . . . . 

### 7
2.6 Visible Emissions

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

### 8 2.6.1 Table of Visible Emissions Sum.mary

- 

### Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet.

. . . . . . . . . . 

### 8
3.0 Source Operation 3 .1 General Plant Operations

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

### 8


# I

### 4.0 Sampling and Analysis Procedures

4. 1 Emissions Testing

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1 .1 Figure of Stack Diagram

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet Stack

. . . . . . . . . 10 4.1 .2 Table of Traverse Point Calculations

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . 4.1 .3 Figure of Stack Diagram

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet Stack .

. . . . . . . . 12 4.1 .4 Tabie of Traverse Point Calculations

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet.

. . . . . . . . . . 13 

## 4.1 . 5 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet

. . . . . . . . . . 14 

## 4.1 . 6 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet.

. . . . . . . . . . 1 5 

## 4.1 .7 Summary Table of Calculated Results

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet

. . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.1 .8 Summary Table of Calculated Results

-Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet

. . . . . . . . . . .18 4.1 . 9 Figure of EPA Method 201 A Sample Train

. . . . .. 19 4.1 .10 CEM Sample Train .

. . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5.0 Quaiity Control/Quality Assurance 5 .1 Compliance Testing .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

APPENDICES
A. Approval Order F. Data-Logger Sheets B. AET Pretest Protocol G. AET CEM Readings 

## C. Production Data H. VEO Readings 8 Certification Cards D. Field & Laboratory Data I. Calibration Data E. Emissions Calculations



# ~

### "EMISSIONS SURVEY FOR S02, NO x , CO, HF AND PM 10 EMISSIONS CONDU.CTED ON INTERSTATE BRICK COMPANY'S KILN NO. 3 SCRUBBER,

LOCATED IN WEST JORDAN, UTAH"



### 1 .0 Introduction 

### 1.1 Test Puroose 

### At the request of Interstate Brick Company's, Mr. John Hewitt, American Environmental Testing, Inc., (AET) conducted a series of Emissions Testing for sulfur dioxide (S02), oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrofluoric acid (HF) and PM 1 0 emissions at Interstate Brick Company's West Jordan Facility. These tests were accomplished October 31, 1995. The individual sources and the emissions that were quantified are listed below:

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber - Inlet S02, NO x , CO, HF & PM10 Kiln No. 3 Scrubber - Outlet S02, NO x , CO, HF & PM10 On October 27, 1994, The Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) issued the Interstate Brick Company an "Approval Order" for their West Jordan Facility. A copy of the permit is attached as Appendix "A". In the permit, conditions were established for various pollutants emission levels and criteria were set for testing to verify compliance with these limitations. The UDEQ set the following emission limits in the Approval Order for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber:

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber PM 1 0 1.9 Ibs/hr (Outlet) S02 17.0 Ibs/hr NO x 1.8 Ibs/hr HF 1.5 Ibs/hr CO Emissions Testing is for Title V purposes only. There is no set emission limitation. Because of excessively high temperatures .in the Inlet of the No. 3 Scrubber and liquid droplets present in the gas stream of the Outlet of the No. 3 Scrubber at the sample port location. AET tested using EPA Method 5 and 202 to quantify particulate emissions (considering all particulate captured to be PM10) at both locations. Mr. Hewitt, requested that AET prepare a"Pretest Protocol" to submit to the UDEQ outlining the required tests. The protocol, without the calibration data is presented in Appendix "B".

6% -1-

### AET performed Compliance Emissions Testing as set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Chapter I, Part 60, Appendix "A". The following methods were used to conduct the emissions testing:



## Method 1 -" Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources" 

### Method 2 -" Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (type "S" pitot tube)"
Method 3 -" Gas Analysis for Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen, Excess Air and Dry Molecular Weight"
Method 4 -" Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases" 

### Method 5 -"Determination of Particulate Emissions and Backhalf Condensables from Stationary Sources"
Method 6C -" Determination of Sutfur Dioxide Emissions from 

## Stationary Sources" (instrumental Analyzer Procedures)
Method 7E -" Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from 

## Stationary Sources" (Instrumental Analyzer Procedures)
Method 10 -" Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions



## from Stationary Sources" (Instrumental Analyzer Procedures)
Method 13B -" Determination of Hydrofluoric Acid from Stationary Sources" 

### Method 202 -"Determination of Condensables Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources"
2.0 Summary of Results 

### 2.1 p

~ 

### 1 i I A Emissions



### (EPA 5/202)


### The emissions data accumulated for PM 10emissions during the October 31, 1995 Compliance Testing is summarized in Table 2.1.1 for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet and Table 2.1.2 for the Scrubber Outlet.

- 

# 2- 1

### (PM 10 Emissions Summary)
Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet



### Test Run DSCF

Collected Emissions Rates

I b s/ h r gr/dscf
1 2 3 40.3740

38.1693 37.2603 1.5714

1.5581 1.4645 0.0097

0.0099 0.0094 Average = 38.6012 1.5313 0.0097

Table 2.1.2 

### (PM 1 0 Emissions Summary)
Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet



### Test Run DSCF

Collected Emissions Rates

I b s/ h r gr/dscf
1 2 3 49.2786

45.2297 45.0035 1.5803

1.7841 1.4663 0.0103

0.0125 0.0102 Average = 45.5039 1.6102 0.0110
The average PM 1 0 emission of 1.6 Ibs/hr is 84.21% of the allowable ceiling level of 1.9 Ibs/hr.

### 2.2

~ 

### Q 2 Emissions 

### (EPA 6C) 

### The emissions data accumulated for S02 emissions during the October 31, 1995 Compliance Testing is summarized in Table 2.2.1 for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet and Table 2.2.2 for the Scrubber Outlet.

(S0 2 Emissions Summary)

Test Run Emissions Rates

ppm Ibs/hr
1 2 3 125.63

147.92 148.33 23.628

27.036 26.731 Average = 140.63 25.799

Table 2.2.2 

### (S02 Emissions Summary)
Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet



### Test Run Emis i ns Ra 

### tes

ppm Ibs/h r
1 2 3 0.45

0.34 0.34 0.080

0.057 0.057 Average = 0.38 0.065


## The average measured S02 emission concentration for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet was 0.065 Ibs/hr, which is 0.38% of the UDEO permitted allowable ceiling of 17.0 

## Ibs/hr.

-4-

### 2.3 NO,, Emissions 

### (EPA 7E)
The emissions data accumulated for NO X emissions during the October 31, 1995 Compliance Testing is summarized in Table 2.3.1 for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet and Table 2.3.2 for the Scrubber Outlet.

Table 2.3.1 

### (NO X Emissions Summary)

Test Run Emissions Rates

ppm Ibs/hr
1 2 3 79.07

77.52 82.06 10.697

10.191 10.637 Average = 79.55 10.508

Table 2.3.2 

### (NO X Emissions Summary)
Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet



### Test Run Emis ions R 

### ates

ppm Ibs/hr
1 2 3 23.40

19.54 24.58 3.00

2.34 2.95 

# F ;rage = 22.51 2.76


### The average measured NO X emission concentration for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet was 2.76 Ibs/hr, which is 153.33% of the UDEO permitted allowable ceiling of 1.8 Ibs/hr



### -5- 

## ~~

### 2.4 CO Emissions 

### (EPA 10)

The emissions data accumulated for CO emissions during the October 31, 1995 Compliance Testing is summarized in Table 2.4.1 for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet and Table 2.4.2 for the Scrubber Outlet.

Table 2.4.1 

### (CO Emissions Summary)

Test Run Emissions Rates

ppm Ibs/h r 1 2 3 455.62

445.38 444.65 37.581

35.700 35.142 Average = 

### 448.55 36.141

Table 2.4.2 

### (CO Emissions Summary)

. i
.


### Test Run Emissions Rates

ppm Ibs/h r 1 2 3 461.14

409.35 420.32 36.045

29.884 30.735 

# F erage = 

### 430.27 32.221
There were no limitations set for CO Emissions by the UDEO. Testing was for Title V purposes only.

-6- 

# 13

### 2.5 HF Emissions 

### (EPA 13B) The emissions data accumulated for HF emissions during the October 31, 1995 Compliance Testing is summarized in Table 2.5.1 for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet and Table 2.5.2 for the Scrubber Outlet.
Table 2.5.1 

### (HF Emissions Summary)

. X-

..

Test Run Emissions Rates

mg/dscf I b s/ h r 1 2 3 7.999

11.414 14.422 25.51 27.71

34.52 Average 

# = 11.278 29.25

(HF Emissions Summary)
Z41GMU7 -WW

- MM-

- 1

- MW*M i M i



### Test Run Emissions Rates

mg/dscf I b s/ h r
1 2 3 0.00834

0.00720 0.00673 0.0198

0.0160 0.0149 Average 

# = 0.00742 0.0169
The average measured HF emission concentration for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet was 0.0169 Ibs/hr, which is 1.13% of the UDEO permitted allowable ceiling of 1.5 Ibs/hr.

-7- 

# 14

### W

-



### -ZLYM • - • • 

## 4..► 

## • VEO's were taken simultaneously with each of the EPA Method 5/202 runs for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet. Averages for the three (3) runs are given in Table 2.6.1.

Table 2.6.1



### (Visible Emissions Opacity Summary)

Test Run No. %VEO

1 1.46 2 1.25 3 1.67 Average = 

### 1.45
The average VEO reading of 1.45% for theKiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet was 7.25% of the allowable ADEO ceiling level of <_ 20%.

I
. - •

. .1 

### 3.1 General Plant Operations 

### The manufacture of brick and related products such as clay pipe, pottery and some types of refractory brick involves the mining, grinding, screening and blending of the raw materials, and the forming, cutting or shaping, drying or curing, and firing of the final product. Surface clays and shales are mined in open pits. Most fine clays are found underground. After mining, the material is crushed to remove stones and is stirred before it passes onto screens for segregation by particle size. To start the forming process, clay is mixed with water, usually in a pug mill. The three principal processes for forming brick are stiff mud, soft mud and dry press. In the stiff mud process, sufficient water is added to give the clay plasticity, and bricks are formed by forcing the clay through a die. Wire is used in separating bricks. AII structural tile and most and most brick are formed by this process. The soft mud process is usually used with clay too wet for the stiff mud process. The clay is mixed with water to a moisture content of 20 to 30 percent, and the bricks are formed in molds. In the dry press process, clay is mixed with a small amount of water and formed in steel molds by applying pressure of 500 to 1500 pounds per square inch.

-8-

### Wet clay units that have been formed are almost completely dried before firing, usually with waste heat from kilns. Many types of kilns are used for firing brick, but the most common are the downdraft periodic kiln and the tunnel kiln. The 

### periodic kiln is a permanent brick structure with a number of fireholes where fuel enters the furnace. Hot gases from the fuel are drawn up over the bricks, down through then by underground flues, and out of the oven to the chimney. Although lower heat recovery makes this type less efficient than the tunnel kiln, the uniform 

### temperature distribution leads to a good quality product. Production Data during the testing period was given to AET by Interstate Brick 

## Company and is attached as Appendix "C".

4. 0 Sampling and Analysis Procedures



### u • ~ 

### t• 

### A EPA Method 1; sample and velocity traverses for stationary sources. Figure 4.1.1 is a diagram of the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet Stack. This reference method requires the tester, due to stack geometry, to sample for particulate and velocity at twenty (20) separate locations in the stack, five (5) per. traverse, in four (4) separate ports. . The location of these points relative to the stack are given in Table 4.1.2. 

### Figure 4.1.3 is a diagram of the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet Stack. The reference methods require the tester, due to the stack geometry, to sample for particulate 

### and velocity at twenty-four (24) separate locations in the stack, twelve (12) per traverse, on diameter lines 90 0 apart from one another. The location of these points relative to the stack are given in Table 4.1.4. B. EPA Method 3; for gas analysis of carbon dioxide, oxygen, excess air, and dry molecular weight. 

### This reference method requires that a gas sample be extracted from the stack for analysis concurrently with each of the runs. The integrated gas sample is then analyzed via an orsat for carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and oxygen. The nitrogen value is obtained by difference. Results from these determinations are included in Appendix "D" with the field and 

### laboratory data forms for each individual source. C. EPA Method 2, 5 8 202 Combined; for the determination of velocity, particulate 

### matter, PM 10 em issions/back- half condensables and volumetric flow rate from stationary sources. 

### To evaluate compliance with the PM 10 limitation specified in the "Approval Order", AET had to test using methodology consistent with the above referenced 

### methods. Data from the three (3) separate runs, which constitute a singte compliance test, are summarized in Table 4.1.5 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet and Table 4.1.6 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet.

-9- 

# 11

### Interstate Brick Company's Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet Stack Diagram

Figure 4.1.1



# ~

L

A= 251 "= 5.23 Diameters B= 120" = 2.5 Diameters

### 5 10 15 20

. . . .



### 4 9 14 19■ . . .



### 3 S 13 18

. . . .



### 2 7 12 17

. . . .



### 1 6 11 16

. . . . 

### mi

9.6° 4.8" 

### Interstate Brick Company's Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet Traverse Point Locations

Table 4.1.2



## 48"

~ 

## 16 66 k6

Sample Ports are 15" Long

Sample Poi nt Distance from outside of Port 1, 6, 1 1, 16 19.8" = 19 3!4" 2, 7, 12,17 29.4" = 29 3!8" 3, 8, 13, 18 39.0" = 39" 4, 9, 14, 19 48.6" = 48 5/8" 5, 10, 15,20 58.2" = 58 1 /4"



## _11_ 

# /f ~

### 98.0" - 1.63 Diamters

264.0" . 4.4 Diamters 

### Interstate Brick Company's Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet Stack Diagram

Figure 4.1.3



# ~ --- 60.0" I.D. — 

# ~

-12-AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

Table 4.1.4
TRAVERSE POINT CALCULATIONS

- •, ~ •__.

.~~ 

## . . . . i

. ~ 

## :S

~ 

## ••:-

~

~ 

## ._. .. .:.

. . ti._

.

.. i • -. ~ - 1

. ~

Traverse Percent of Stack I.D. Product of Distance Traverse Point Point Stack I.D. inches col. 2&3 Y Location from Number (to 1/8 in) outside of ports (sum of columns 4 & 5) 1& 13 2.1 60 1.26 6.0" 7.26 = 7 1/4" 2& 14 6.7 60 4.02 6.0" 10.02 = 10.0" 3& 15 11.8 60 7.08 6.0" 13.08 = 13 1/8" 4& 16 17.7 60 10.62 6.0" 16.62 = 16 5/8" 5& 17 25 60 15 6.0" 21.0 = 21.0" 6& 18 35.6 60 21.36 6.0" 27.36 = 27 3/8" 7& 19 64.4 60 38.64 6.0" 44.64 = 44 5/8" 8& 20 75 60 45 6.0" 51.0" 9& 21 82.3 60 49.38 6.0" 55.38 = 55 3/8" 10 & 22 88.2 60 52.92 6.0" 58.92 = 58 7/8" 11 & 23 93.3 60 55.98 6.0" 61.98 = 62.0" 12 & 24 97.9 60 58.74 6.0" 64.74 = 64 3/4"



### -13- 

# ~AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
TABLE 4.1.5 (FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY)

Plant: Interstate Brick Source: Kiln #3 - Outlet ~Qe: EPA Method #5 Date: 10/31 /95 Symbol Description Units Test #1 Test #2 Test #3
Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 55.205 51.271 51.068

sampied @ meter Iso 59.069 54.860 54.643 conditions Pb Barometric Pre: "Hg abs 25.42 25.35 25.32 AH Average Pres "H20 1.8226 1.7546 1.7473

drop across the orifice meter Tm Average gas °R 540.33 545.15 545.06

meter temp °F 80.33 85.15 85.06 Yi Meter Coefficient 1.07 1.07 1.07 Vw Total H20 ml 168.6 201.7 195.4

collected, impingers & silica gel CO2 % 5.1 5.1 4.9 02 % 14.9 14.5 14.9 N2 + CO % 80 80.4 80.2 Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.368 0.368 0.368 Ts Stack Temp °R 597.96 595.25 595.42 °F 137.96 135.25 135.42 Sqr rt OP Velocity head "H20 0.3459 0.3338 0.3333

of stack gas Cp Pitot Tube 0.8654 0.8654 0.8654

Coefficient Ps Static Pres "H20 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 Pabs Absolute Pres "Hg 25.38 25.31 25.28 As Area stack Ft2 19.635 19.635 19:635

Stack in inches 60 60 60 Tt Net time min. 72 72 72

of test Mgp Mn Total 32.9 36.5 29.8



# ~ 7 -14-AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
TABLE 4.1.6 (FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY)

Plant: Interstate Brick Source: Kiln #3 - Inlet Tvne: EPA Method #5 Date: 10/31 /95 5ymbo) Description Units Test #1 Test #2 Test #3
Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 49.53 46.99 46.323

sampled @ meter Iso 48.787 46.285 45.628 conditions Pb Barometric Pre: "Hg abs 25.41 25.34 25.3 AH Average Pres "H20 1.5734 1.3724 1.3571

drop across the orifice meter Tm Averrage gas °R 544.1 544.2 548.68

meter temp °F 84.1 84.2 88.68 Yi Meter Coefficient 0.985 0.985 0.985 Vw Total H20 ml 62.5 60.7 63.4

collected, impingers & silica gel CO2 % 3.5 3.7 3.4 02 % 14.6 14.3 14.9 N2 + CO % 81.9 82 81.7 Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.312 0.312 0.312 Ts Stack Temp °R 1006.15 993.45 1004.65 °F 546.15 533.45 544.65 Sqr rt AP Veloaty head "H20 0.5395 0.5226 0.5205

of stack gas Cp Pitot Tube 0.8696 0.8696 0.8696

Coefficient Ps Static Pres "H20 -0.18 -0.18 -0.18 Pabs Absolute Pres "Hg 25.40 25.33 25.29 As Area stack Ft2 15.999 15.999 15.999

Stack in inches 54.16 54.16 54.16 Tt Net time min. 60 60 60

of test Mgp Mn Total 25.4 24.5 22.8

-15- 6 

# ~ 49--

### The original laboratory and field data accumulated at the test site are presented in Appendix "D". Orsat and laboratory weight forms are hand written on site as the data is generated. Particulate (PM 10 ) and velocity measurements, required in the applicable reference methods, are generated in the field by computer. These forms are also included in Appendix "D" for each of the three (3) runs that comprise acompliance test. Compliance criteria is calculated using computer and handwritten field forms and are summarized in Table 4.1.7 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet and Table 4.1.8 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet. A copy of the example calculations are attached as Appendix "E". Figure 4.1.9 is a schematic of the sample train used to obtain the field data. A stainless steel probe liner was used for the testing. The glass fiber filters used in the train are 99.95% efficient on 0.3 micron particles and have no organic binders (Andersen P-3710). These filters are tared before use and after the test to determine particulate loading. Filter weights and particulate in the acetone washes of the glassware and probe ahead of the filter constitute the total particulate catch. The probe and filter are kept at 248°F ± 25 11 during sampling. Moisture in the stack gases is collected by keeping the impingers in the sample train below 68°F with an ice bath. The "back-half" of the moisture sampling train contained the following impingers: Impinger Number Contents Amount Parameter Collected


### 1 Deionized Water 100 ml Moisture 2 Deionized Water 100 ml Moisture 3 Empty

- - - - - - - 

### Moisture 4 Silica Gel @200 g Mo.isture Prior to doing the EPA Method 5/202 tests, AET ran a pretest cyclonic flow determination in the exhaust stacks per EPA Method 2 criteria. Sources are testable if the average flow rate varies less than 20 0 from parallel to the vertical stack. The average Angle (°) was found to be 1.91 0 for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet. The Field Form for cyclonic flow is included in Appendix "D" with the Field and Laboratory Data. On all tests for PM 10

Emissions, the sampling train was leak-checked at the nozzle at 15 inches of vacuum (Hg), and the reading recorded on the computer forms. This was done to predetermine the possibility of a diluted sample. After each test is complete AET conducts a final leak check to insure sample integrity. Those values are also included in the computer printouts. Before and after each test, the pitot tube lines were checked for leaks under both a vacuum and pressure. The lines were also checked for clearance and the manometer was zeroed before each test. These leak checks are shown on the computer forms for each run in Appendix "D". D. EPA Method 6C, 7E and 10; for S0 2 , NO x and CO emissions from stationary sources (Instrumental Analysis Procedures)

-16- 

# a3AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED

- .565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
TABLE 4.1.7 (CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA)

Plant: Interstate Brick Source: Kiln #3 - Intlet Twe: EPA Method #5 Date: 10/31 /95

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Vm std Volume dry gas dscfin 0.6729 0.6362 0.6210

sampled @ standard dscf 40.374 38.1693 37.2603 Conditions Vw gas Volume water scf 2.9419 2.8571 2.9842

vapor collected C standard conditions Bws Proportion by 0.0679 0.0696 0.0742

volume of water vapor in gas stream dimensioniess Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 29.144 29.164 29.14

weight Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.3871 28.3865 28.3139

weight Vs Stack gas ft/sec 47.3805 45.6738 45.8357

velocity Qs Volumetric flow ft3/hr 1.133 1.1011 1.0856

rate dry basis x E+6 x E+6 x E+6 standard conditions Iso Isoldnetic % 107.424 104.5039 103.4652

variation Cs Conc. Particulat , Ib/scf 6.2912 6.4188 6.1191

matter in stack x E-4 x E-4 x E-4 gas dry basis Emr Emission rate * Ibs/dscf 1.3869 1.4151 1.349 x E -6 x E -6 x E -6 gr/dscf 0.0097 0.0099 0.0094 Ibs/hr 1.5714 1.5581 1.4645
NOx Ibs/hr 10.07 10.191 10.637 CO Ibs/hr 37.581 35.7 35.142 S02 Ibs/hr 23.628 27.036 26.731 HF Ibs/hr 25.51 27.71 34.52 /

-17- 

# C*~

,

AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
TABLE 4.1.8 (CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA)

Plant: Interstate Brick Source: Kiln #3 - Outlet Tvoe: EPA Method #5 Date: 10/31 /95

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.6844 0.6282 0.6250

sampled @ standard dscf 49.2786 45.2297 45.0035 Conditions Vw gas Volume water scf 7.936 9.494 9.1975

vapor collected @ standard conditions Bws Proportion by 0.1387 0.1735 0.1697

volume of water vapor in gas stream dimensionless Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 29.412 29.396 29.38

weight Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 27.8291 27.4189 27.4489

weight Vs Stack gas ft/sec 23.5423 22.8724 22.8384

velocity Qs Volumetric flow ft3/hr 1.0737 1.0028 1.0044

rate dry basis x E+6 x E+6 x E-+6 standard conditions Iso Isokinetic % 101.7164 99.9607 99.2984

variation Cs Conc. Particulat. Ib/scf 6.6763 8.0699 6.6217

matter in stack x E-4 x E-4 x E-4 gas dry basis Errr Emission rate * Ibs/dscf 1.4719 1.7791 1.4598 x E -6 x E -6 x E -6 gr/dscf 0.0103 0.0125 0.0102 Ibs/hr 1.5803 1.7841 1.4663
NOx Ibs/hr 3 2.34 2.948 CO Ibs/hr 36.045 29.884' 30.735 S02 Ibs/hr 0.08 0.057 0.057 HF Ibs/hr 0.0198 0.016 0.0149d W
~ 

### 4 

# c W F-- 4 W 2



### W } ~ 

### W 7 O 

# W = CJ? ~ 

# W ~

~ ~ H LLI wiL 

## 0 LLI 

### W O IJy 

### ~ W
~ ~ d 

### M W CL 

# x W H 

### a-j
~ U} ~

~

f

# W W

~ 

## m O OC

~ ~ ~ 

### W W f ~ 

### W H Ca -CC 4 C ~

~ W

~ J 

### -cc > 

## 4 r 

## ~ a



## a

~ 

### H

2 0 Ig/ ~ (

~ 9 4



### cr W F~ - W

~ 

### CA

- CC C)

~ 

## 2

~
~

W 

# ? J 

# 4 }~ CA CA 

# C IOL 

### 1 

### m 

### O lx c W CD z 

## a~ ~ J

0~ W F- 

# W O 

## a 

# cc

~ H 

## O H 

### IL 

## LL. a W 

## z_ W J z ~

LLI J 2

~ 2

~ } ~

~

~ W W ~ 

# o~

~ W i 2 H 

# ~ • a

~ 

# Q .` `

LLI 

# _ lx H

~ 

### LLI • O ~ oa 

### ix W 2 H ~ 

### O!
T

~ 

### d L

~ 

### LL. C 

# E- _d CL 

# (a 

# (j) LO


## C s c W 6 

### Q 

# a W

-19-► ~

### The sample train used to extract and condition the stack gases for S02, NO xand CO analysis is shown in Figure 4.1.10. S02 concentration is measured using a TECO 40A S02 analyzer. A TECO 10A NO x analyzer is used to determine the concentration of NO x and CO emissions were determined by using a TECO Model 48 Gas Filter Correlation (GFC) CO Analyzer. Three each 30 minute tests were run for S02, NO x and CO emissions. Individual data-logger sheets for each run are included in Appendix "F". AET's CEM readings taken every minute for 30 minutes are included in Appendix "G". E EPA Method 9; for visible emissions opacity. During each of the EPA Method 5/202 runs on the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet, AET had a certified VEO reader compile VEO's every fifteen (15) seconds for six (6.0) minutes. Field VEO forms and the readers current certification cards are included as Appendix "H". F. EPA Method 13B for the determination of hydrofluoric acid (HF) emissions from stationary sources as specified in Federal and State regulations. Particulate and gaseous hydrofluoric acid are extracted from the stack isokinetically using a modified EPA Method 5 sample train. Total fluoride is determined on the filter, probe and prefilter glassware and in the back-half impinger water using a specific ion electrode.

5.0 

### Quality Control/Ouality Assurance



## • • i• Specific items used in the EPA approved sample trains require pretest and post-test calibrations. The frequency of the calibrations and guidelines for procedural items are delineated in the EPA's "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems". For EPA Methods 1-5/202, 6C, 7E, 10 and 13B, the quality assurance guidelines are intended to insure that the S02, NO x , CO, HF and PM 10 emissions are quantified in a manner consistent with the most stringent sampling criteria possible. AET testing personnel are thoroughly trained in all aspects of the EPA required QA/oC guidelines. The crew supervisor has certified at the front of this report that the test crew adhered to those guidelines in the regulations applicable to the compliance testing at Interstate Brick Company's West Jordan, Facility. There were no deviations from prescribed methodology reported by the supervisor. Calibrations for the sample nozzle, pitot tube, thermocouples, orifice, filter balance and dry gas meter used to extract the sample at an constant sampling rate are attached as Appendix "I"

-20- 

## rt-7

## CEM Sample Train Figure 4.1.10

Continuous Emissions Analyzers

Ca1i bration Gases

-21- 

# ~

### The main quality criteria that AET is required to fulfill for the EPA 51202 emissions testing is as follows:

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

### 1. Isokinetic Sampling Rate = 100 ± 10.0%

AET Run Number Sampling Rate

1 107.43 2 104.50 3 103.47 Average = 105.13 2. Sampling Volume => 31.8 DSCF

AET Run Number Sample Volume (DSCF)

1 40.37 2 38.17 3 37.26 Average = 38.60 

### AII of the compliance test quality assurance criteria was achieved for this set of tests.

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet 

### 1. Isokinetic Sampfing Rate = 100 ± 10.0%

AET Run Number Sampling Rate

1 101.72 2 99.96 3 99.30 

## Average = 2. Sampling Volume => 31.8 DSCF

AET Run Number



# ~ ~ Average = 100.33

Sample Volume (DSCF)
49.28 '45.23 45.00 46.50

-22- 

# ~ `

### AII of the compliance test quality assurance criteria was achieved for this set of

tests. - The CEM sample train was also leak checked prior to testing the Enterprise Engines. The standards used for these tests conformed to EPA "Protocol 1" quality. Those certifications are included in Appendix "I". The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Method 6C requires that the following items are met:

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 100 ppm:

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). AET had a zero gas of purified N 2 that was < 0.1 ppm S02. b. Mid-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span value. AET's mid-level calibration gas was 54.5 ppm, which was in the acceptable range.

c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span value. AET's high-level calibration gas was 88.4 which was in the acceptable range. The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "I" 2. Measurement System Performance Specifications During the S02 tests AET's measurement system is required to meet the following criteria:

a. Zero drift for each run should be < _ 3.0% of the span value. Run No. 1

- 

### 0.06 Run No. 2

- 

### 0.13 Run No. 3

- 

### 0.03 b. Calibration drift should be <_ 3.0% of the span value. Zero Gas - 0.10 Mid-Level Gas - 0.20 High-Level Gas - 0.03

-23- 

# s(J

### c. Calibration bias error for each run should be 5 

### 5.0% of the calibration gas 

### value. ' Run No. 1 - -0.95 Run No. 2 - -1 .11 Run No. 3 - - 0. 9 3 AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are included in Appendix

1f 1 

### "

.

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 100 ppm: a Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). AET had a zero gas of purified N 2 that was < 0.1 ppm S02.
b. Mid-level. calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span value. AET's mid-level calibration gas was 54.5 ppm, which was in the acceptable range.

c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span value. AET's high-level calibration gas was 88.4 which was in the acceptable range. The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "I". 2. Measurement System Performance Specifications During the S02 tests AET's measurement system is required to meet the following criteria: a Zero drift for each run should be < 3.0% of the span value. Run No. 1 - 0.10 Run No. 2 - 0.10 Run No. 3 - 0.20 b. Calibration drift should be <_ 3.0% of the span value. Zero Gas - 0.10 Mid-Level Gas - 0.60 High-Level Gas - 0.20

') A 

# 3I

### c. Calibration bias error for each run should be <_ 5.0% of the calibration gas value. .
Run No. 1 - 0.20 Run No. 2 - -0.30 Run No. 3 - 0.10 AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are included in Appendix 

### "1". The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Method 7E requires that the following items are met:
Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

### 1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 1000 ppm:

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NOx). 

### AET had a zero gas of purified N 2 that was < 0.1 ppm NOx.
b. Mid-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span value. 

### AET's mid-level calibration gas was 525.5 ppm, which was in the acceptable range.

c. High-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span value. 

### AET's high-level calibration gas was 899.5 which was in the acceptable range. The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "I". 2. Measurement System Performance Specifications During the NOx tests AET's measurement system is required to meet the following 

### criteria: a Zero drift for each run should be <_ 3.0% of the span value. Run No. 1 - 0.04 Run No. 2 - 0.02 Run No. 3 - 0.01 

### b. Calibration drift should be <_ 3.0% of the span value. Zero Gas - 0.00 Mid-Level Gas - 1.00 High-Level Gas - 0.06

-2S- 

# ~ -4--

### c. Calibration bias error for each run should be <_ 5.0% of the calibration gas vaEue. Run No. 1 - -1 . 04 Run No. 2 - -1 . 2 3 Run No. 3 - -1 . 4 8 AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are included in Appendix

" 

## I "
. - rt , • • • ' ~~~ 

### 1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 100 ppm: a Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NOx). 

### AET had a zero gas of purified N 2 that was < 0.1 ppm NOx.
b. Mid-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span value. 

### AET's mid-level calibration gas was 53.4 ppm, which was in the acceptable range.

c. High-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span value. 

### AET's high-level calibration gas was 87.3 which was in the acceptable range. The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "I". 2. Measurement System Performance Specifications During the NOx tests AET's measurement system is required to meet the following criteria: 

### a Zero drift for each run should be <_ 3.0% of the span value. Run No. 1 - 0.30 Run No. 2 - 0.50 Run No. 3 - 0.60 

### b. Calibration drift should be 5 3.0% of the span value. Zero Gas - 0.20 Mid-Level Gas - 0.20 High-Level Gas - 0.10



## -26- 

## ~ 3

### c. Calibration bias error for each run should be <_ 5.0% of the calibration gas value. Run No. 1 - 0.50 Run No. 2 - 0.50 Run No. 3 - 0.40 AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are included in Appendix

N I11 - 

### The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Method 10 testing requires that the following items are met:

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

### 1. EPA Protocol 1 

### gas standards consisting of carbon monoxide (CO) in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 1000 ppm.

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm CO). AET used a zero gas of purified N2 that is <0.1 ppm CO. b. Mid-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to approximately 30 percent of the span value. AET's mid-level calibration gas was 324.0.

c. High-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to approximately 60 percent of the span value. AET's high-level calibration gases was 646.8 ppm. a Zero drift for each run should be <_ 3.0% of the span value; they were as follows: Run No. 1 - 0.07 Run No. 2 - 0.04 Run No. 3 - 0.04 b. Calibration drift for each test should be < _ 3.0% of the span value; they were as follows: Zero Gas - 0.00 Mid-Level Gas - 0.21 High-Level Gas - 0.05

-27- v `

### c. Calibration bias error for each run shouid be 5 5.0% of the calibration gas value; they were as follows: Run No. 1 - 0.27 Run No. 2 - - 0. 2 0 Run No. 3 - -1 . 43 AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are included in Appendix 

## "I".

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of carbon monoxide (CO) in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 1000 ppm. a Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm CO). AET used a zero gas of purified N2 that is <0.1 ppm CO. 

### b. Mid-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to approximately 30 percent of the span value. 

### AET's mid-level calibration gas was 324.0.

c. High-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to approximately 60 percent of the span value. AET's high-level calibration gases was 646.8 ppm. a Zero drift for each run should be 5 3.0% of the span value; they were as follows: Run No. 1 - 0.09 Run No. 2 - 0.00 Run No. 3 - 0.00 

### b. Calibration drift for each test should be <_ 3:0% of the span value; they were as foilows: Zero Gas - 0.01 Mid-Level Gas - 0.03 High-Level Gas - 0.09



### c. Calibration bias error for each run should be 5 5.0% of the calibration gas value; they were as follows: Run No. 1 = 0.49. Run No. 2 - 0.05 Run No. 3 - 0.09 AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are inctuded in Appendix 

## "1".

~

# Appendix "A" (Approval Order)

agmFtican Envizonmzntaf 9ssti.n9 Com#any gnc.
GReno, cNavada nGtnr.z, G4tizona cSaCt -falt eity, Q

~ 

### ta4


### 702-786-8553 6o2-253-3354 8o,-266-7m 

# <36

# Appendix "A" (Approval Order)

~~

# STATE OF UTAH

Department of Environmental Quality

Division of Air Quality
INTENT TO APPROVE TUNNEL KILN #4

Prepared By: Nando Nleli, Engineer

1 ~I ~ • . . . ~ ~ i: ~4'



## DAQE-947-94 Date: October 27, 1994 

## Source 

# INTERSTATE BRICK COMPANY

Russell A. Roberts Executive Secretary Utah Air Quality Board



# m

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 Page 2 Abstrad Interstate Brick is required by the P* 1 SIP to reduce S0 1 emissions to meet Reasonable Available Control Technology (RACI). The Approval Order contains new emission limitations which have been determined to meet RACT. Interstate Brick has also proposed an increase in fluoride emissions for Kiln #4, the only kiln which had aJluoride emission lbnit. Modeling of 

### overall fluoride eniissions has been performed which demonstrates compllance with the threshold limit values set for

, 

### fluoride. CorrespoRding emissfon liniits for fluoride from each kiln are contained in the Approval Order. Previously unfdentified emfssions from ezisting baghouses, which have been determined .to meEt Best Avaiiable Control Technology (BACT) requirements, are contained in the Approval Order with assoeiated emission/operating liraitations. The Notice of Intent for the above-referenced project has been evaluated and has been found to be consistent with the requirements of the Utah Air Conservation Rules (UACR) and the Utah Air Conservation Act. However, air pollution producing sources and%or their air control facilides may not be constructed, installed, established, or modified prior to the issuance of an Approval Order (AO) by the Executive Secretary of the Utah Air Quality Board. The Division of Air Quality has determined that a pubiic comment period is not required for your particular project referenced above. Unless you have comments which would require changes, the AO for this project will be based upon the following condicions: General Conditions: 

### 1. This AO appiies to the following company: Interstate Brick 9780 South 5200 West West Jordan, Utah 84084 The equipment listed below in this AO shall be operated at the following location:
PLANT LOC.4TION: 

### Universal Transverse Mercator (UTI) Coordinate System: 4,491.5 km North, 413.5 km East 

### 2. Definitions of terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in the 

### UACR, Utah Administrative Codes (UAC), and Series 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR). These definitions take precedence unless specifically defined otherwise herein. 3. Interstate Brick shall operate the brick manufacturing facility according to the information submitted in the Notices 

### of Intent dated November 30, 1992, December 1993, June 7, 1994, and additional information dated September 22, 1994, and according to requirements listed in this AO.

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 3 4. Regardless of any inconsistency between conditions of this AO and Section IX.H.2.b.0

and Section IX.H.2, this AO shaIl take precedence as provided by R307-1-3.2.4, UAC. 5. , A copy of this AO shall be posted on site. The AO shall be available to the employees who operate the air emission producing equipment. These employees shall receive instruction as to their responsibilities in operating the equipment according to all of the relevant conditions listed below. 6. The approved instaIlations shalI consist of the following equipment: A. Tunnel Kiln #1
B. Tunnel Kiln #3 C. Tunnel Kiln #4

_ D. Grizrzly Hopper

E. Primary Crusher
F. Secondary Crusher/Grinding G. Screens
H. Two Lime SiIos
I. Clay Storage Piles
J. Miscellaneous DieseI Equipment
K. Line 3 Baghouse - Micro Pulsaire*
L. Line 4 Baghouse - Micro Pulsaire* * Or Equivalent
7. This AO shall replace the AO dated October 20, 1980.
8. Interstate Brick shall rebuild the scrubber or design a new scrubbing system for Kiln #3. If the scrubber is rebuiit, the scrubber shall be rebuilt as described in the Notice of Intent dated December 10, 1993. Should the scrubber require replacement, or modifications other than those described as "Alternative A" in the December 10, 1993, Notice of Intent, Interstate Brick shall submit complete design specifcations including operating parameters and proposed emission limitations for approval prior to construction. In no case shall emissions of any poilutant from a newly designed scrubbing system exceed emission limitations listed in this AO as final limits. 

# 4

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 4 Interstate Brick shall modify the scrubber for KiIn #4 as proposed in the Notice of Intent

dated November 30, 1992. In addition, Interstate Brick shall operate the scrubber for Kiln #4 using soda ash in the scrubbing solution until modiHcations to the scrubber for Kiln #3 are complete and stack testing on the scrubber for Kiln #3 demonstrates that the scrubber is meeting the emission limits listed in this AO. Limitations and Tests Procedures 9. Emissions to the atmosphere from the indicated emission point shall not exceed the following rates and concentrations:

, A. Scrubber Emissions - Tunnel Kiln #1:

llutan Transition Limits Final Limits (to October 1. 1995)


### PM io (annual average)* Shall not operate 1.9 lb/hr

, SO : (1-hr average) 17.0 lb/hr

SO

~ 

### (annuaI average) 14.0 lb/hr NO ; 1.8 lb/hr , HF (1-hr average) 4.5 !b/hr HF (annual average) 1.5 lb/hr
B. Scrubber Emissions - Tunnel Kiln #3: Pollutant Transition Limits Final Limits (to October 1. 1995) 

### PM, o (annual average)* 3.6 lb/hr 1.9 lb/hr
S0 2 (1-hr average) 105.0 lb/hr 17.0 Ib/hr
SO ; (annual average) 36.8 lb/hr 14.0 lb/hr
NO = 1.8 lb/hr 1.8 !b/hr 

## HF (1-hr average) 10.5 Ib/hr 4.5 lb/hr HF (annual average) 3.5 !b/hr 1.5 lb/hr



# ~~

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 5 C. Scrubber Emissions - Tunnel KiIn #4

Pollutant 

### Transition Limits Final Limits (to October l. 1995) 

### PM IO (annual average)* 12.3 Ib/hr 12.3 lb/hr SO Z (1-hr average) 51.01b/hr 77.0 ib/hr SO ; (annual average) 18.0 lb/hr 27.0 lb/hr NO ; 2.6 Ib/hr 2.6 lb/hr HF (1-hr average) 5.7 Ib/hr 7.2 Ib/hr HF (annual average) 1.9 lb/hr 2.41b/hr * PM, o emission rates expressed as annual averages above for the scrubbers for Kilns #1, #2, and #3 shall be demonstrated through an 8-hr stack test. ShouId PlVt, o emissions test at a higher rate than the limits expressed above, Interstate Brick shall provide documentation which demonstrates that the limits are being met, on an annual average basis, within 30 days of the date of the stack test. The method provided in the documentation shall be verifiable. D. Primary Crusher Baghouse Vent
PM IO 0.49 Ibs/hr 0.016 g rains/dscf
E. Line 3 Baghouse
PM 10 0.37 ibs/hr 0.016 grains/dscf
F. Line 4 Baghouse PM, o 0.67 Ibs/hr 0.016 grains/dscf 10. Stack testing to show compliance with the emission limitations stated in the above condition (excluding annual average emission rates for SO : and HF, but inciudin}annual average emission rates for PM, o ) shall be performed as specified below: Emission Point Pollutant Testing Test 

## S tatus Frequencx Scrubber, Kiln #1 PM, o *** ® SO, *** % 

### HF *** %



# `F~

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 6 Scrubber, Kiln #3 PM, o ** ® S0, ** o 

### N0., ** ® HF ** % Scrubber, Tunnel Kiln #4 PM10 ** ® SO, ** 9b 

### NO = ** ® HF ** % Primary Crusher Baghouse Pbi lo ** !g? Line 3 Baghouse PM 10 Line 4 Baghouse PN1 10 ** ® Testing Status 

### (To be applied above)
** Initial compliance testing is required. The initial test shall be completed by December 1, 1994, to show compliance with emissions limits listed during the transition period. An additional initial test shall be completed to show compliance with emission limits listed as final Iimits. Testing to show compliance with the final emission limits shaII be completed by November 1, 1995 *** Initial compliance testing is required within 30 days of start-up of Tuanei KiIn #1.

~ 

### Test if directed by the Executive Secretary. Tests mav be 

### required if the source is suspected to be in violation with other conditions of this AO.
# Test every year
95 Test every three years 

### A. Notification 

### The applicant shall provide a notification of the test date at least 30 days before the test. A pretest conference shall be held if directed by the Executive Secretary. It shall be held at least 15 days before the test between the ownerloperator, the tester, and the Executive Secretary. The emission point shall be designed to conform to the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 1, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) or Mine Safety and Health Administration (NiSHA) approvable access shall be provided to the test location.



# A~

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 7 B. PNf io

For stacks in which no iiquid drops are present, the foIlowing methods shall be used: 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Nfethods 201 or 201a. The back half condensibles shall also be tested u'sing the method specified by the Executive Secretary. All particulate captured shall be considered PMIO,, For stacks in which liquid drops are present, methods to eliminate the liquid drops should be expiored. If no reasonable method to eliminate the drops exists, then the following methods shall be used: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5, Sa, 5d, or 5e as appropriate. The back half condensibles shall also be tested using the method specifed by the Executive Secretary. The portion of the front half of the catch considered PM, o shall be based on information in AP-42, Appendix C or other data acceptable to the Execudve Secretary. 

### The back half condensibles shall not be used for compliance demonstration but shall be used for inventory purposes. Compliance testing of PM, o emissions for Kilns #1, #2, and #3 shall be conducted over an eight hour time period. C. Sample Location 40 CFR 60. Appendix A, Method 1
D. Volumetrfc Fiow Rate 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2
E. Sulfur Dioxide (SO,) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6, 6A, 6B or 6C
F. Nitrogen Oxides (NO_) 

### 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 7, 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D or 7E
G. Hvdroflouric Acid (HF) The test method shall be submitted for approval or may be assigned by the Executive Secretary.

. .



# q~ "

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 Page 8 H. Calculations

To determine mass emission rates (Ibs/hr, etc.), the pollutant concentration as determined by the appropriate methods above shall be multiplied by the volumetric flow rate and anv necessary conversion factors determined by the Executive Secretary to give the results in the specified units of the emission limitation. I. riew Source .Oneration For a new source/emission point (Line 4 and Line 5 baghouses), the production rate during all compliance testing shall be no less than 9090 of the production rate listed in this A0. If the maximum AO allowable production rate has not been achieved at the time of the test, the following procedure shaIl be followed: 1). Testing shall be at no less than 90% of the production rate achieved to date. 2) If the test is passed, the new maximum allowable production rate shall be 110% of the tested achieved rate. This new allowable maximum production rate shall remain in affect until successfully tested at a higher rate. 3) The owner/operator shall request a higher production rate when necessary. Testing at no less than 90R'o 

### of the higher rate shall be conducted. A new maximum production rate (110 0 of the new rate) wiil then be alIowed if the test is successful. This process may be repeated until the maximum AO production rate is achieved.
J. Existing Source Operation For an existing sourcelemission point, the production rate during all compliance testing shall be no less than 90% of the maximum production achieved in the previous three (3) years.
11. Compliance with annual average limitations listed in condition ##9 shall be determined through a method of mass balance. Interstate Brick shall submit a mass balance method of determining annual emissions to the Executive Secretary for approval no later than December 1, 1994. The plan shall include:
A. Proposed test methods and test frequency for determining the weight of the elemental sulfur and fluorine contained in the clays used to manufacture brick
B. Proposed test methods 

### and test frequency for determining the weight of the elemental sulfur and fluorine contained in the finished product
C. A method of determining scrubber efficiencies as an annual average

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 9 D. Calculation method of determining annuaI emissions of SO : and HF which wiIl

demonstrate compliance with the annual average emission rate(s) listed in condition #9 of this AO 12. The following limits shall not be exceed without prior approvaI in accordance with R307- 

### 1-3.1, UAC. A. Production/Consumption limits i) Raw Clay Consumption

120 tons/hr 1,051,200 tons/year 

### ii) 512,582 tons of brick produced per 12-month period, plantwide
B. Tunnel Kiln #1 Annual production limit of bricks included in 12.A.ii above Note: Interstate Brick is not operating Tunnel KiIn #1 as of the date of this AO and it is not allowed to operate during the transition period (to 1011195). The scrubber for KiIn #1 requires rebuilding and modifications to meet the emission limits contained in condition #9. Interstate Brick shall submit a complete description of proposed modifications to the scrubber for Tunnel Kiln #1; and receive approval from the Executive Secretary, prior to construction.
C. Tunnel Kiln #3 Annual production limit of bricks included in 12.A.ii above
D. Tunnel KiIn #4 Annual production limit of bricks inciuded in 12.A.ii above
E. Line 3 Baghouse 6,240 hours per year
F. Line 4 Ba g house 6,240 hours per year Compliance with the annual limitations shall be determined on a rolling 12-month total. 

### The owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total based on the first day of each month using data from the previous 12 months. Records of consumption/production shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records of



# ~ lr

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 10 consuniption%production, inciuding rolling 12-month totals shall be made available to the

Executive Secretary or his representative upon request, and shaIl include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. The records shall be kept on a daily basis. Hours of operation shall be determined by supervisor monitoring and 

### maintaining of an operations log. 13. Visible emissions from the foIlowing emission points shaIl not exceed the following values: A. All crushers - 15 90 opacity B. All screens - 10% opacity C. All conveyor transfer points - 10% opacity D. All baghouses - 10% opacity E. All other points - 2090 opacity Opacity observations of emissions from statfonary sources shall be conducted according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. Visible emissions from mobile sources and intermittent sources shaIl use procedures simiiar to Method 9, but the requirement for observations to be made at 15-second intervals over a six-minute period shall not apply. 14. The moisture content of the clay shall be maintained at an average of no less than 4.095 by weight. The siIt content of the ciay shall be no greater than an average of 18.09 by weight. The moisture content and the silt content shaIl be tested if directed by the Executive Secretary using the appropriate ASTM method. 15. The storage pites shall be watered to minimize generation of fugitive dusts as dry conditions warrant or as determined necessary by the Executive Secretary.
Fuels 16. The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a fuei and propane as a backup fuel in

the kilns. If any other fuei is to be used, an AO shall be required in accordance with R307-1-3.1, UAC. od lina 17. Tliis source has been modeled for fluoride emissions prior to issuance of this AO. Interstate Brick shall submit an analysis using parameters measured during the initial stack test for each scrubber. The analysis shall include parameters measured as compared with the parameters used in the modeling exercise compieted. Critical parameters to be included in the analysis are as follows:
A. Exhaust exit temperature
B. Exhaust exit velocity/flow
C. Fluoride emission rate

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 Page I1 The results 'of the analysis shall be used to determine the applicability of the modeling

completed. Additional modeling shaIl be performed if directed by the Executive Secretary. Monitorine 

### 18. Interstate Brick shall instali, calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device for the continuous measurement of the chan;e in Q,ressure of the ;as stream through each 

### cru ber. The monitoring device must be ce.rtifed by the maaufacturer. The monitoring device shall be accurate within plus or minus one inch of water gauge and must be calibrated on an 

## annual basis according to the manufacturer's instructions. Continuous recording for the monitoring device is not required. However, daily records of readings shall be maintained and dates of calibrations shall be recorded. Interstate Brick shall measure and record the pressure drop during each compliance stack test of each scrubber. The pressure drop measured during the most recent compliance stack test shall be the minimum (-10%) of that required during all operating periods. 19. Interstate Brick shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device for the continuous measurement of the scrubbine liquid flow rate to the scrubber 

### . The monitoring device must be certified by the manufacturer. Accuracy shall be within plus or minus tive percent of the design scrubbing liquid flow rate. Calibration shall be on an annual basis according to the manufacturer's instructions. Continuous recording for the monitoring device is not required. However, daily records of readings shall be maintained and dates of calibrations shall be recorded. Interstate Brick shall measure aad record the scrubbing liquid flow rate during each compiiance stack test on each scrubber. The scrubbing liquid flow rate measured during the most recent compliaace stack test shall be the minimum (-10fo) of that required during all operating periods. 20. Interstate Brick shall measure the pH of the scrubbing solution for each scrubber on a daily basis. The measuring device must be certified by the manufacturer as being accurate to plus or minus 5%. The measuring device shall be calibrated on a monthly basis. Interstate Brick shall measure and record the pH of the scrubbing liquid, and the type of neutralizer (hydrated time, soda ash, etc.) during each compliance stack test of each scrubber. The pH measured during the latest compliance stack test shall be the minimum pH (-5%) of the scrubbing solution during all operating periods. The neutralizer used during the most recent compliance stack test shall be that required during all operating periods. Records & 

### Miscellaneous
21. All installations and facilities authorized by this AO shall be adequately and properly maintained. All pollution control vendor recommended equipment shall be installed,


# WK

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 12 maintained, and operated. Instructions from the vendor or established maintenance

practices that maximize pollution controi shall be used. All necessary equipment control and operating devices, such as pressure gauges, amp meters, volt meters, flow rate indicators, temperature gau;es, continuous emission monitors (CEMs), etc., shall be instalIed and operated properly aad ea.sily accessibie to compliance inspectors. A copy of all manufacturers' operating instruction for poIlution control equipment and pollution emitting equipment shall be kept on site. These instructions shail be available to all employees who operate the equipment and shaIl be made available to compliance inspectors upon their request. 22. All records referenced in this AO or in applicable NSPS or NESHAP, which are required to be kept by the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Executive Secretary or his representative upon request. Examples of records to be kept at this source shall include the following as applicable: A. Production rate/operating hour limitations (Condition number 12) B. Scrubber operating parameters (Condition numbers 18, 19, and 20) C. Unavoidable Breakdown Reports (Condition number 24) D. Emergency episodes (Condition number 25)
23. The owner/operator shall comply with R307-1-3.5, UAC. This rule addresses emission inventory reporting requirzments. 24. The owner/operator shall compiy with R307-1-4.7, UAC. This rule addresses unavoidable breakdown reporting requirements. The owner/operator shall calculate/estimate the excess emissions whenever a breakdown occurs. The total of excess emissions shall be reported to the Executive Secretary as directed for each calendar year. 25. The owner/operator shall submit to the Executive Secretary an emergency episode plan within 60 days of the date of this AO. The pian shall identify what control/production measures the owner/operator shall implement when an emergency episode is declared by the Executive Director of the Department of Environmental Quality. Specific control/production measures shall be outlined for all three levels (Alert, Warning, Emergency). The values for the various leveis are listed in R307-1-5, UAC. The emergency plan shall be approved by the Executive Secretary. Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be approved in accordance with R307-1-3. 1. 1, UAC. This AO in no way releases the owner or operator from any liability for compliance with all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations including the UACR.



# 49

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 Page 13 Annual emissions for this source, the entire plant, are currently calculated at the foilowing values:

Pollutant Total Emissions tons/vear TSP 112.1 PM 10 88.8 SO Z 240.9 NO X 65.7 CO 27.2 VOC 0.8 HF 23.7 These calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicability of Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) aad nonattainment area major source requirements of the UACR. They are not to be used for purposes of determining compliance. In accordance with the requirements of Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act, the following pollutants may be subject to an operating permit fee. Both the fee rate and the ciass of pollutants are subject to change by state, the federal agencies, or both.

Pollutant Total Emissions Tons/Year PM, o 88.8 SO : 240.9 NO x 65.7 VOC 0.8 HF 23.7 The Division of Air Quality is authorized to charge a fee for reimbursement of the actual costs incurred in the issuance of an AO. Unless you have comments which would require additional work, the fee for this AO will be $4,625.00. An invoice is attached. Your AO can be issued as soon as payment is received. S incerely,

L"ynn R. Menlove, Manager New Source Review Section



# m

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 14

Interstate Brick Company 

### Tnnnel Itiln #4 

### Salt Lake County - CDS A1 NA Toxics TitleVMajor

Fili 

### ng Fee


### . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Review Engineer 64.00 hours @ $50.00/hr . . . . Modeler . . . . 28.50 hours @ $50.00/hr

. . . .

•. Computer Fee . . 

### . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

### Notice To Paper . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

### Travel . . . . . 0.0 miles @ $0.23/mile

. . . . Total Charges . . . Amount Paid to Date $ 0.00 

### $ 3,200.00 $ 1,425.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
$ 4,625.00 $ 0.00

Balance Due -. . . .

Please remit a cop9 of this invoice with your Uayment.


### Please send payment to:
Utah Division of Air Quality 

### 1950 West North Temple Salt Lake City, IItah 84114-8420 (801) 536-4000 

### $ 4,625.00



# 5

# Appendix "B"

(AET Pretest Protocol)



# ~ 

# 3

# AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL

TESTING COMPANY, INC.

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

Pre-test Information Form & Attachments

SOURCE INFORMATION 

### September 29, 1995 Facility Name: Interstate Brick Company Units to be Tested: 1. No. 3 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet

2. No. 3 Brick Kiln Scrubber Outlet Mailing Address: 9780 South 5200 West, West Jordan, Utah 84088-5689 Plant Address: Same as above Phone: (801) 280-5200 Plant Contact: Mr. John Hewitt, Plant Manager Test Date: October 31, 1995

CONTRACTOR OR 

### TEST FIRM Name: American Environmental Testing, Company, Inc. Address: 565 South Birch Drive, Spanish Fork, Utah, 84660 Phone: (801) 266-7111 Contact: V. Brent Benson, Technical Director



## SOURCE TEST SUMMARY

EPA Method 1 Location of Sample & Velocity Inlet & Outlet Traverses from Stationary Sources EPA Method 2 Stack Gas Velocity and Fiow Inlet & Outlet Rate from Stationary Sources

-1- 

# s4

### EPA Method 3 Gas Analysis for Carbon Dioxide Inlet & Outlet Oxygen, Excess Air & Dry 

### Molecular Weight of Stack C~ 

### es EPA Method 4 Moisture Content in Stack Inlet & Outlet C-eses EPA Method 5 Particulate Emissions from Inlet & Outlet



## Stationary Sources EPA Method 6C Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Inlet & Outlet



## Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) EPA Method 7E Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Inlet & Outlet



## Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) EPA Method 10 Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Inlet & Outlet



## Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) EPA Method 13B Totai Fluoride Emissions from Inlet & Outlet



## Stationary Sources (Specific lon Electrode Method) EPA Method 202 Back-Half Condensable Emissions from Inlet & Outlet



## Stationary Sources

SAMPLE TRAIN AND ANALYSIS INFORMATION 

## Interstate Brick company is currently operating under the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEO) "Intent to Approve Number DAQE-947-94" which requires that particulate testing be accomplished using EPA Method 201 A; unless liquid drops are present in the gas stream. If this is found to be the case, EPA Method 5/202 will be used to substitute for EPA 

## Method 201 A. The back half condensables shall be tested using the method specified by the Executive Secretary (EPA Method 202). An EPA Method 201 A sample train will be employed to perform the above referenced PM 10 testing. The sampling device used is a Cyclone I of the SRI/EPA five-stage series cyclone. This 

## device provides a 10 micron size cut at a flow rate of approximately 0.5 dscfm; the precise flow rate depends on local stack conditions. A glass or teflon probe liner will be used and maintained at a temperature of 248 0 ± 25°F for the duration of the test. The filter holder wiil also be kept at a temperature of 248° ± 25°F. The first two (2) impingers will contain 100 mis of distilled water, the third impinger will be lift empty, and the fourth will contain a known amount of silica gel. AII impingers will be weighed before and after each test to determine the moisture content of the gases. The impinger bath will be maintained at a temperature lower that

/ i h



## ~ 

# J -'_-

### 68°F to condense the moisture. The back-half impinger solutions will be evaporated and

weighed or extracted with methyiene chloride and evaporated and weighed as per EPA Method 202 depending on the pH of the solution. Pitot tubes and the meter system will be leak checked before and after sampling. Figure 1 is a schematic of the EPA Method 201A sample train to be used. The giass filters will be of binderless variety (Anderson Smellers P-2710 + 99.95% efficient on 0.3 microns particulate). The nozzle, cycione, and outside of the turn around cup will be washed with AR grade acetone and be considered to be larger than PM 10 . The inside of the tum around cup, the stem leading down to the filter and the filter holder itself will be washed with AR grade acetone. This catch, along with the filter wiil be used for the particulate emissions calculations for PM10. EPA Method 1313 will be used to determine the hydrofluoric acid (HF) emissions from stationary sources as specified in Federal and State regulations. Particulate and gaseous hydrofluoric ac9d are extracted from the stack isokinetically using a modified EPA Method 5 sample train. Total fluoride is determined on the filter, probe and prefiiter glassware and in the back-half impinger water using a specific ion electrode. EPA Methods 6C, 7E & 10 are instrumental methods. The sample train incorporates taking a sample line from the stack, conditioning the sample, and finally running it through the analyzers. Figure II is a schematic of the analyzer sample train, showing both sample line locations and calibration line locations. Variations to this schematic wiil be made according to each method. The mass emission calculations for S0 2 , NO x & CO wiil use the flow rate (DSCFH) derived from each of the. EPA Method 201A/202 tests respectfully.

CEMS Gas Standards for Determination of Compliance The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Methods 6C, 7E and 10 requires that the following items are met:

1. 

### EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide (S0 2 ) in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 1000 ppm:

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). AET had a zero gas of purified N 2that was < 0.1 ppm S02.
b. Mid-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span value. AET's mid-level calibration gas will be 514.6 ppm, which is in the acceptable range.

c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span value. AET's high-level calibration gas will be 901.6 which is in the acceptable range.

### ~

d L

~

~ LL 

### C

~ i H



### ~ 

### a 

## F cc cn
Q T

~ N 

## a O t
,.. ~

~ 

# a W oc W N W 

### N dc 

### N

OC W 

# W E Z O J Z

~ ! 

### {

~ i OC W 

### H W

~ O

~ OC 

### W S F~



### W 

## m O

~ 

### c 

## a oc o W

~ y C ~ 

### J { O W 

### S = 

### W

. W W J J W

c N O

~ J W C7

~ {



### CJ N ~



# ~ N v m

~ 

### J LN.

F~ tl! C

W t

`

=0 W C.~ ~ ~ Z ~ L~

~ 

### O

C W H { 99 

### e m 

# Fig I J

~ 

# w ~ W

V S { { } CS i~



### 7 G.



# ~ ~ d " FLIN

I~ 

### x W CA 

### ! 0 • a

W J N N O 

## r

~ 

### ; ~ W

~ 

### a~ ~ } ~



# ~ ~ o



### — ~ a

-- 

# ~ - 

# 61

### ;k 

## CEM Sample Train Figure II

Continuous Emissions Anslyzers

Calibration Gsses


# sr~ -5-

### 2. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of carbon monoxide (CO) in nitrogen in the

following ranges for the span value of 0 to 100 ppm. a Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm CO). 

### AET will use a zero gas of purified N2 that is <0.1 ppm CO. b. Mid-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to approximately 30 percent of the span vaiue. AET's mid-level calibration gas will be 32.4.

c. High-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to approximately 60 percent of the span value. AET's high-level calibration gases will be 62.7 ppm. 3. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide (NO x ) in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 100 ppm: a Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NO x ). 

### AET has a zero gas of purified N 2that is < 0.1 ppm NOx.
b. Mid-level catibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span value. 

### AET's mid-level calibration gas will be 53.4 ppm, which is in the acceptable range.

c. High-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span value. 

### AET's high-level calibratio.n gas will be 86.8 ppm which is in the acceptable range. 4. Measurement System Performance Specifications During the S02, NO x

and CO tests, AET's measurement system is required to meet the following criteria:

a. Zero drift <_ to 3.0% of the span value. 

### b. Calibration drift <_ 3.0% of the span value.

c. Calibration bias error has to be <_ 5.0% of the calibration gas value.
These conditions will be met.



### -6- 

# ~ 

# Z

### Current calibration gas certificates of analysis for S0 2 , NO x and CO are included in

Appendix ."A": AII standards to be employed for the tests wiil have current certifications.



### CALIBRATION DATA The EPA and State agencies require various calibrations for specific equipment used during testing. The current caiibration data is included in Appendix "A". A sample of all field data forms will be made available at the job site.

PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 

### The manufacture of bricfc and related products such as ciay pipe, pottery and some types of refractory brick involves the mining, grinding, screening and blending of the raw materials, and the forming, cutting or shaping, drying or curing, and firing of the final product.

. Surface ciays and shales are mined in open pits. Most fine clays are found underground. After mining, the material is crushed to remove stones and is stirred before it passes onto screens for segregation by particle size. 

### To start the forming process, clay is mixed with water, usually in a pug mill. The three principal processes for forming brick are stiff mud, soft mud and dry press. In the stiff mud process, sufficient water is added to give the clay plasticity, and bricks are formed by forcing the clay through a die. Wire is used in separating bricks. AII structural tile and most and most brick are formed by this process. The soft mud process is usually used with clay too wet for the 

### stiff mud process. The ciay is mixed with water to a moisture content of 20 to 30 percent, and the bricks are formed in molds. In the dry press process, ciay is mixed with a small amount of water and formed in steel molds by applying pressure of 500 to 1500 pounds per square inch. Wet clay units that have been formed are almost completely dried before firing, usually with waste heat from kilns. Many types of kilns are used for firing brick, but the most common are the downdraft periodic kiln and the tunnel kiln. The periodic kiln is a permanent brick structure with a number of fireholes where fuel enters the furnace. Hot gases from the fuel are drawn up over the bricks, down through then by underground flues, and out of the oven to the chimney. Although lower heat recovery makes this type less efficient than the tunnel kiln, the 

### uniform temperature distribution leads to a good quality product.
STACK SCHEMATIC AND TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS 

### Attached are the schematics showing plan and elevation of ducting and stack arrangements including sample port positions relative to upstream and downstream disturbances. Also included are cross-sectional sketches of the stack at the sampling locations.
1. Figure III is a drawing of the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet. 2. Figure IV is a drawing of the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet. 

### 3. Traverse point locations for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet are listed in Table l. 4. Traverse point locations for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet are listed in Table II.

-7- l 

### ~~

### Interstate Brick Cornpany's Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet. Stack Diagram

Figure III



## Ak

48"

A= 251 "= 5.23 Diameters B= 120" = 2.5 Diameters

-8- 

# ~ `)8.0" • 1.63 Diamters

?64.0" m 4.4 Diamters 

### Interstate Brick Company's Kiin No. 3 Scrubber Outfet Stack Diagram

Figure IV



# ~ 1---- 60.0" I.D. -- 

# ~

o

### 5 10 15 20

. . . .



### 4 9 14 19

. . . .



### 3 8 13 18

. . . .



### 2 'r 12 17

. . . .



### 1 6 11 16

. . . . 48"



### 9.6

~ . 

### 4. 8

.. 

### Interstate Brick Company's Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet Traverse Point Locations

Table 1

48"

~ 

### 6 66 66 66

Sample Ports are 15" Long

Sample Poi nt Distanc¢ from outside of Port 1, 6, 1 1, 16 19.8" = 19 3/4" 2, ?, 12, 17 29.4" = 29 3!8" 3, 8, 1.3, 18 39.0" = 39

.. 4, 9, 14, 19 '-
- W-IW 5, 10, 15, 20 58.2" = 58 1 /4"



## -io- 

# ~ 

# 3

### AMEFtICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

Table II


### TRAVERSE POINT CALCULATIONS

..■ 

### _ -

~ 

### _- _ :• , •,,•.■

~ 

### . _ •

.-■ 

### . . . . . . ~ { ~ . .~ 

### _ •

_

..■ 

### • _. - ..

. . • •
.

_ ~



### Traverse Percent of Stack I.D. Product of Distance Traverse Point Point Stacic I.D. inches col. 2&3 Y Location from Number (to 118 in) outside of ports (sum of columns 4 & 5) 1& 13 2.1 60 1.26 6.0" 7.26 = 7 1/4" 2& 14 6.7 60 4.02 6.0" 10.02 = 10.0" 3& 15 11.8 60 7.08 6. 0" 13.08 = 13 1/8" 4& 16 17.7 60 10.62 6.0" 16.62 = 16 5/8" 5& 17 25 60 15 6.0" 21.0 = 21.0" 6& 18 35.6 60 21.36 6.0" 27.36 = 27 3/8" 7& 19 64.4 60 38.64 6.0" 44.64 = 44 5/8" 8& 20 75 60 45 6.0" 51.0" 9& 21 82.3 60 49.38 6.0" 55.38 = 55 3/8" 10 & 22 88.2 60 52.92 6.0" 58.92 = 58 7/8" 11 & 23 93.3 60 55.98 6.0" 61.98 = 62.0" 12 & 24 97.9 60 58.74 6.0" 64.74 = 64 3/4"

- i I - 1)

### SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS AND OTHER REQUIRE3MENTS

AII testing stations will be accessible from OSHA approved scaffolding or platforms. AET will require 4- 120V, 20 amp, 10 circuits to be provided by Interstate Bricic Company in order to perform the emissions tests.



### PROPOSED TESTING OUTLINE A Each of the Methods 201 A/202 tests will be approximateiy 60 minutes. B. Nozzie diameter will be selected after pretest data is collected. O EPA Method 3, will be used to determine the dry molecular weight of the gas stream. 

### The gas analysis will be conducted at the job site using an Orsat. D. The moisture content and particulate concentration of the gas stream will be measured by using EPA Method 2-201 A/202. The impingers wiil be weighed at the job site. 31.8 DSCFH will be collected at a rate greater than 0.531 dscfm if Method 5/202 ' replaces 201 A/202.



### E An "S" Type Pitot Tube will be used to measure the velocity of the gas stream using EPA Method 2(if the stacic is 12" inches or greater). An inciined manometer will be used to measure the velocity head. The first mark on the manometer is 0.01 inches of water column from the zero mark. Current pitot tube and meter calibrations are attached in Appendix "A" with the Calibration Data. F. Barometric pressure will be measured at the stacic sampling position via an aneroid barometer. 

### G, The cross over piece located between the filter and probe will be modified to receive a thermocouple to determine the temperature of the gases leaving the probe.
H. S0 2 emissions will be determined via EPA Method 6C using a TECO Model 40 Pulsed Fluorescence Analyzer. Three each

- 30 minute tests will be run for S02 emissions.


### I. NO x emissions will be determined via EPA Method 7E using a TECO Model 10 AR Chemiluminescent N0/NOX Analyzer. Three each 30 minute tests will be run for NO x emissions.
J. CO emissions will be determined via EPA Method 10 using a TECO Model 48 Gas Filter 

## Correlation (GFC) CO Analyzer. Three each 30 minute tests will be run for CO emissions. 

### K. A data-logger will be used to record the test data for each of the three S0 2 , NO x and CO emissions tests with 30 separate readings for each run at one minute intervals .

-12- 

## ~o~

# Appendix "A"

(Calibration Data)



# imAmerican Environmentai Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11
Meter Box Caiibration Data Form (English Units)

Date Barometric Pressure Mete.► Box Number 9/22/95 25.54 RAC #145-569
Averagg Y Average OH Calibrated By Std. Meter Yi 0.98S 1.812 VBB - RBB 0.99497

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter AH/13.6 Wet Test Meter Setting OH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp.

0.50 4.85 5 70 0.03676 68 

### 71

_ 1.00 4.81 5 70

. 0.07353 68


### • 71 1.50 9.711 10 70 0.11029 68 

### 71 2.00 9.683 10 69 0.14706 68 

### 70 3.00 9.458 10 69 0.22059 67 

### 70 4.00 9.469 10 70 0.29412 68 

### 71 Dry Gas Meter 

### Inlet Outlet Average Time PJ (Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi AH

71 75 73.50 11.14 0.9738 1.7109 

### 72 76 72 78 76.00 8.09 0.9689 1.8262 

### 74 80 76 85 82.25 12.89 0.9880 1.6865 

### 79 89 83 96 91.00 11.55 0.9996 1.7870 

### 85 100 87 107 98.00 9.57 0.9879 1.8975 

### 89 109 91 113 102.50 8.46 0.9923 1.9642 

### 92 114 Average Yi Average AH 0.985 1.812



# ~~American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11
Meter Box Calibration Data Form (Engiish Units)

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number 9/2/95 25.62 UT 790-484
Average Yi Averagg AH Calibrated By Std. Meter Yi 0.985 1.719 BAL - GEJ 0.99497

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter AH/13.6 Wet Test Meter Setting OH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp.

0.50 4.84 5 72 0.03676 71 

### 72 1.00 4.88 5 73 0.07353 72 

### 73 '

• 1.50 9.62 10 73 0.11029 70 

### 73 2.00 9.72 10 74 0.14706 73 

### 73 3.00 9.79 10 73 0.22059 73 

### 73 4.00 9.78 10 74 0.29412 74 

### 74 Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 (Td i)

- F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi AH

70 77 74.25 11.23 0.9676 1.7578 

### 71 79 71 83 78.25 8.15 0.9797 1.8147 

### 72 87 73 92 84.25 12.54 0.9787 1.6277 

### 74 98 75 100 88.00 11.08 0.9887 1.6670 

### 75 102 76 104 91.25 9.05 0.9988 1.6347 

### 78 107 79 108 94.25 8.25 0.9985 1.8120 

### 81 109 Average Yi Average AH 0.985 1.719

I

!~

### American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Forlc, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11
Meter Box Calibration Data Form (Engiish Units)

Date Barometric Pressure

_ Meter Box ,Vumber 9/22/95 25.54 RAC #2824
Averagg Yi Average LH Caiibrated Bv Std. Meter Yi 0.910 1.630 VBB - RBS 0.99497



### Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter 4LH/13.6 Wet Test Meter Setting OH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp.

0.50 4.57 5 69 0.03676 69 

### 69 1.00 4.58 5 70 0.073 53 69.5

~ 

### - 69 1.50 8.91 10 70 0.11029 70 

### 70 2.00 8.901 10 71 0.14706 70.5 

### 70 3.00 8.84 10 69 0.22059 69.5 

### 70 4.00 8.829 10 71 0.29412 70.5 

### 70 Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outfet Average Time 0 (Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi CH

71 70 70.50 9.88 0.9107 1.5301 

### 70 71 71 77 74.50 7.19 0.9174 1.6045 

### 72 78 74 87 82.25 11.83 0.9031 1.7002 

### 76 92 78 96 88.00 10.09 0.9096 1.6382 

### 80 98 82 101 92.25 8.324 0.9095 1.6762 

### 84 102 86 104 95.25 7.104 0.9090 1.6292 88 103 Average Yi Average AH 0.910 1.630 

# aAmerican Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish For1c, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1
Meter Box Calibration Data Form (Engiish Units)

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number 9/2/95 25.61 CR #(097)

Averaae Yi Average AH Caiibrated By Std, Meter Yi 1.070 

### 1.883 VBB

- JPB 0.99497

Orfice Manometei Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter AH/13.6 Wet Test Meter Setting LH 

### (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp.

0.50 

### 5.42 5 70 0.03676 70 70 1.00 

### 5.517 5 71 0.07353 71

'

. 71 1.50 10.64 10 72 0.11029 72 72 2.00 10.71 10 73 0.14706 73 73 3.00 10.84 10 73 0.22059 73 73 4.00 

### 10.88 10 74 0.29412 74 74 Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 (Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) 'F Minutes Yi OH

70 69 69.75 12.75 1.0765 1.8160 70 70 71 70 70.75 9:18 1.0942 1.8207 

### 71 71 71 72 71.75 14.71 1.0536 

### 1.8889 72 72 71 72 72.00 12.96 1.0575 1.9358 72 73 72 73 72.50 10.9 1.0683 2.0031 72 73 73 74 73.50 9.05 1.0692 1.8310 73 74 Average Yi Average AH 1.070 

### 1.883



## /)'bAmerican Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11
Pitot Tube Calibration Form

P9tot Tube Identification Number: 8' - A Calibrated By: RBB - tbb
"A" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s Cp

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.3 0.4 0.8660 2 0.3 0.4 0.8660 3 0.31 0.41 0.8695 Average: 0.8672

"B" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s Cp

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.31 0.41 0.8695 2 0.3 0.4 0.8660 3 0.31 0.4 0.8803 9ate: 9/2//95

Deviation

-0.00117 -0.00117 0.00234

Deviation

-0.00243 -0.00594 0.00837 Average: 0.8720

A & B Average = 

### 0.8696



# WAmerican Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111
Pitot Tube Caiibration Form

D2te:9/20/95 Pitot Tube Identification Number. 8' - B Caiibrated By: RB RH
"A" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s Cp

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (indies H20) (inches H20) 1 0.29 0.4 0.8515 2 0.285 0.395 0.8494 3 0.29 0.4 0.8515 Average: 0.8508

"B" Side Caiibration
Run Number P std P s CP

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (indies H20) (inches H20) 1 0.29 0.39 0.8623 2 0.285 0.395 0.8494 3 0.29 0.395 0.8568 Average: 0.8562 Deviation

0.00068 -0.00136 0.00068

Deviation

0.00612 -0.00677 0.00065

A & B Average = 0.8535



# 0 oq-"A" Side Cafibration

Run Number P std P s

cm H20 cm H20 (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.26 0.36 2 0.25 0.35 3 0.26 0.36 Average:

"8" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s

cm H20 cm H20 (inc,hes H20) (inches H20) 1 0.253 0.355 2 0.26 0.36 3 0.265 0.365 CP Deviation 

### (S)

0.8498 0.00156 0.8452 

### -0.00312 0.8498 0.00156
0.8483

CP Deviation 

### (S)

0.8475 

### -0.00228 0.8498 0.00002 0.8521 0.00226 American Environmentai Testing. Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1

Pitot Tube Calibration Form



### Pitot Tube Identification Number. 8' - C Date: 9/20/95
Calibrated By. RB RH

A & B Average = 0.8490 Average: 0.8498



# ~"A" Side Caiibration
Run Number P std P s

cm H20 cm H20 (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.36 0.51 2 0.36 0.515 3 0.3 5 S 0.505 Average:

"B" Side Caiibration
Run Number P std P s



### cm H20 cm H20 (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.365 0.52 2 0.37 0.525 3 0.375 0.53 Average: CP Deviation



## (S)

0.8402 0.00194 0.8361 -0.00215 0.8384 0.00021
Ce". f*A



## CP Deviation 

## (S)

0.8378 -0.00168 0.8395 0.00001 0.8412 0.00167


### COR-1*l

~~ 

### American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1
Pitot Tube Calibration Form

Pitot Tube Identification Number. 11' - A Date:9/29/95


### Caiibrated Bv: TBB-VBB

A & B Average = 0.8389



# n )l

### American Environmentai Testing Company, Inc. 565 Sauth Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11

Pitot Tube Calibration Form

Pitot Tube Identification Number: 11' - B Calibrated By: TBB - JPB


### "A" Side Caiibration

Run Number P std P s Cp



### cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.31 0.45 0.8300 2 0.31 0.45 0.8300 3 0.3 0.44 0.8257

. Average: 0.8286



### "B" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s Cp

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.3 0.44 0.82S7 2 0.3 0.45 0.8165 3 0.31 0.45 0.8300 Average: 0.8241 9/2/95

Deviation



### 0.00142 0.00142 -0.00285

Deviation

0.00165 -O.00T57 0.00592

A & B Average = 0.8263



# ~~

### American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11
Pitot Tube Calibration Form

Pitot Tube Identification Number. 6' - A Date: 9/2!95
C?librated By: VBB - tbb
"A" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.31 0.47 0.8121 -0.00290 2 0.32 0.48 0.8165 0.00145 3 0.32 0.48 0.8165 0.00145 Average: 0.8150

"B" Side Caiibration
Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.32 0.48 0.8165 0.00558 2 0.32 0.49 0.8081 -0.00279 3 0.32 0.49 0.8081 -0.00279 Average: 0.8109

A & B Average = 0.8130



# 9~American Environmentai Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-711 1
Pitot Tube Calibration Form

Pitot Tube Identification Number. 6' - B Calibrated By- VBB - rbb
"A" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s CP

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.31 0.43 0.8491 2 0.31 0.43 0.8491 3 0.31 0.43 0.8491 Average: 0.8491

"B" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s Cp

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.32 0.45 0.8433 2 0.31 0.43 0.8491 3 0.31 0.42 0.8591 Average: 0.8505 ~~~ 

### Ils

~ 

### •1F ~

Deviation

~ •~~~•
re99 ~

Deviation

-0.00722 -0.00142 0.00863

A & B Average = 0.8498



# -72American Environmentai Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 260 6 -71 1 1

Pitot Tube Caiibration Form

Pitot Tube Identification Number: 6' - T Date: 9/28/95 Calibrated By: R8B - JPS
"A" Side CaGbration

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.29 0.42 0.8309 -0.00288 2 0.3 0.43 0.8353 0.00144 3 0.3 0.43 0.8353 0.00144 Average: 0.8338

"8" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.295 0.43 0.8283 -0.00306 2 0.3 0.435 0.8305 -0.00088 3 0.3 0.43 0.8353 0.00393 Average: 0.8313

A & B Average - 0.8326



# ~~American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1


### Pitot Tube Calibration Form

Pitot Tube Identificaticn Numbs 6' - 0 

### Calibrated By: VBB - JDS
"A" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s

cm H20 cm H20 (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.28 0.37 2 0.28 0.375 3 0.29 0.38 Average:

"8" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s



### cm H20 cm H20 (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.28 0.375 2 0.28 0.38 3 0.275 0.37 Average: Date: 9/30/95

Cp Deviation 

### (S)

0.8699 0.00072 0.8641 -0.00510 0.8736 0.00439
0.8692

CP Deviation 

### (S)

0.8641 0.00256 0.8584 -0.00314 0.8621 0.00058
0.8615

A & B Average = 0.8654



# ~ 

# 9"A" Side Caiibration

Run Number P std P s



### cm H20 cm H20 (inches 

### H20) (inches 

### H20) 1 0.3 0.47 

### 2 0.3 0.47 3 

### 0.3 0.46 Average:

"B" Side Calibration

Run Number P std P s



### cm H20 cm H20 (incties 

### H20) (inches 

### H20) 1 0.31 0.47 

### 2 0.3 0.47 

### 3 0.31 0.47 CP Deviation (S)

0.7989 -0.00288 0.7989 -0.00288 0.8076 0.00576

0.8018

CP Deviation (S)

0.8121 0.00440 0.7989 -0.00880 0.8121 0.00440 American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11

Pitot Tube Calibration Form

P9tot Tube Identification Number: 4' - A Date: 9/2/95 Calibrated By: VBB - rbb

A& B Average s 0.8048 Average: 0.8077American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111

Pitot Tube Calibration Form

Pitot Tube Identification Number. 4' - B Date: 9/30/95
Calibrated Bv: VBB-TBB

"A" Side Calibration

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 

### 0.36 0.475 0.8706 -0.00062 2 0.355 0.46 0.8785 0.00730 3 0.355 0.475 0.8645 -0.00668

. Average: 0.8712

"B" Side Calibration

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation cm H20 crn H20 (S) (inches H20) (inc.hes H20) 1 0.365 0.485 0.8675 0.00596 2 0.36 0.49 0.8571 -0.00441 3 0.355 0.48 0.8600 -0.00156 Average: 0.8615

A & 8 Average - 0.8664



# IAmerican Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11
Pitot Tube Calibration Form

Pitot Tube Identification Number 4' - C Qate: 9/30/95 Calibrated By: VB RBB
"A" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.36 0.495 0.8528 -0.00053 2 0.365 0.5 0.8544 0.00107 3 0.36 0.495 0.8528 -0.00053 Average: 0.8533

"B" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s CP Deviation

cm H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.36 0.5 0.8485 -0.00087 2 0.355 0.495 0.8469 -0.00254 3 0.36 0.495 0.8528 0.00341 Average: 0.8494

A & B Average = 0.8514



# mAmerican Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111
Pitot Tube Calibration Form

Pitot Tube Identifrcation Number. 4' - T

Caiibrated Bv: JPB - JPH
"A" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s

cm H20 cm H20 (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.37 0.49 2 0.38 0.5 3 0.37 0.495



# _ Average:

"B" Side Calibration
Run Number P std P s

cm H20 cm H20 (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.365 0.48 2 0.37 0.49 3 0.37 0.485 Average: Date:9/30/95

Ca Deviation (S)
0.8690 0.00053 0.8718 0.00334 0.8646 -0.00387
0.8684

CP Deviation (S)
0.8720 0.00055 0.8690 -0.00251 0.8.734 0.00196
0.8715

A & 8 Average = 0.8700



# rpm cAmerican Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

### 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111 Stack Temperature Sensor Calibration Form

Thermocoupie Number - #1 Diaital -# 2 Omega Date: 3/3/95 Barometric Pressure: 25.73 

### eaiibrated Bv JDS - RPH Reference: ERTCO - Mg - Giass

Reference Point Source a Reference Thermocouple Temperature 

### Number (specffy) Thermometer Potentiometer Difference b Temperature °F Temperature °F °r6 a) Ice Water 34 35 -0.33 #1 b) Hot H20 140 141 -0.24 Digital c) Boiiing H20 21 S 214 0.20

d) Warm Oil 254 255 -0.19 e) Hot Oii 398 396 0.30

- • f) Boiling Oil 398 401 -0.45 a) Ice Water 35 36 -0.32 #2 b) Hot H20 146 148 -0.48 Omega c) Boiiing H20 204 202 0.42

d) Warm Oi( 233 235

- 0.40 e) Hot Oil 378 375 0.46 f) Boiiing Oil 372 370 0.31

a Type of caiibration system used. b(reference temp. °C + 273) -(test thermometer temp. °C + 273) * 100< 1.5% reference temperature °C + 273



# ~ 

# kAmerican Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111 Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibraticn Form

Sample Box Number. CR##1A

- UT #1A

- RAC #1A-R.4C #2A Qate: 3/3/95 Barometric Pressure: 25.59 Caiibrated By: VBB

- JPB Reference: ERTCO

- 105

- SNBS

Reference Point Source a Reference Thermocoupie Temperature Number (specify) Thermometer Potentiometer Difference b Temperature °F Temperature °F 

# %
3 Oven On 250 251 -0.19 CR 4 Oven On 

### 244 247 -0.58 #1 A 2 Oven On 

### 236 234 0.39

1 Cold H20 54 55 -0.31 8 Oven On 57 56 0.30



# _ 7 Oven On 59 58 0.30
3 Oven On 247 246 0.19 UTA 4 Oven On 243 244 -0.19 #1 A 2 Oven On 239 240 -0.20

1 Cold H20 46 47 -0.31 8 Oven On 55 57 -0.61 7 Oven On 61 60 0.30
3 Oven On 244 

### 243 0.19 RAC 4 Oven On 254 255 -0.19 #1 A 2 Oven On 236 237 -0.20

1 Cold H20 56 57 -0.30 8 Oven On 60 61 -0.30 7 Oven On 63 62 0.30

3 Oven On 241 

### 244 -0.58 RAC 4 Oven On 244 241 0.58 #2A 2 Oven On 20 240 -75.09

1 Cold H20 54 55 -0.31 8 Oven On 5.3 

### 55 -0.61 7 Oven On 61 60 0.30

a Type of calibration system used. b(reference temp. °C + 273) -(test thermometer temp. °C + 273) * 100< 1.5°6 reference temperature °C + 273 

# A5 xAmerican Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11
Balance Calibration Data Form

Baiancs Name: Ohaus GA - 200 S2 (AnalYticai) Number : 1292 Baiance Name: Mettler - BB - 3000 (Too Loader) Number : K6888 c7assificatfon of Standard Weights: Swe "S" W.B.S. Analvst: JDS
A 200 S Ohaus GA - 200 S2

Date 0.500 g 1.0000 g 10.000(,La 50.0000 a 100.0000 a 3/2/94 

### 0.500 1.0001 10.0001 50-0002 100.0002 9/6/94 0.500 1.0000 10.0001 

### 50.0001 100.0001 3/3/95 

### 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0000 100.0000 

### 9/22/95 0.50001 

### 0.9999 10.0001 49.9998

U 3600 Mettfer - BB - 3000

Date 0.500 g 1.0000 a 10.0000 a 50.0000 a 100.0000 a 3/2/94 0.5 1.0 10.0 50.1 100.1 9/6/94 0.5010 

### 1.0001 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000 3/3/95 

### 0.5000 1.0001 10.0000 50.0000 100.0001

# Appendix "C"



# (Production Data)

c4mF2ican Envi.zonmzntaf gE=tin9

~ 

### fom#any -Ync.
cReno, cNevac'a 9 -D 40enix, c4tlzona cSaCt -fake eiEy, Q ~ta~
702- 786- 8553 

### 6 0 2-253-3354 8o -266-7111

# Appendix "C"

(Production Data)

# (I I NTERSTATE B RI CK

, qgW 9780 South 5200 West

West Jordan, Utah 84088-5689 (807 ) 280-5200 800/233-8654 (NAT'L) 800;233-1244 (UTAH) (801) 280-5220 FAX 

# Fax Transmission

no. pa - zes including t11is page:
To: Brent Benson, Ameiican Environmental Testing Fax no./phone no.: 491-9111 1 , 266-7111 Date: 10115195


## From: John Hewitt, 280-52$7 CC: 

## Subject: Interstate 'spr i;:'c Production on Kiln 3 for compliance testing

10/31/95. For the compliance test the kiln speed
~~ 

### as :

~ 

### ::reased to 18 cars per dav, the current maximum production rate of the la1n. During the test the nred -vare loading on the kiin was 

### 26,4681b/hr. of fired ware (18 cars/day x 3.891b/brick x 9072 brickiccr ;. 1 day/24 hr.). The stack testing was therefore done at 100 1 ,'% production of the ltiln. The tvpe of brick going throu_h the k7ln during the test was: Zinfandel, 1lrlountain Red Nfrx, Fidvantage size and Canyon Rose, Canyon Rose Msx, Advantage size. On Monday 10/30/95 the ld.in put out a total of 15 cars of fred brick (increasing the push rate from 11 to 16 cars over the 24 hr. period from 7:15 a.m. to 7:15 a.m.) On Tuesday 10/30/95 at 7:15am the push rate was increased from 16 to 18 cars per day. This rate was maiatained until from 7:15am until 8:35 p.m. at which time aIl testing was completed. Affter the testing was completed the kaln push rate was lowered to 16 cars per day. On Wednesday 11/1/95 the rate was dropped to 10 cars per day. The maximum capacity of the kiln (at preserrt wrthout modification) in terms of kilri cars per day is 18. Due to business canditions and biick sales the plant has been reduced from a 2 shifft to a 1 shift operation in terms of manufacturing brick to be fired. As a result the kiln has been slowed to an 11 ldln car per day production rate. Barri.ng any unforeseen production problems, at this tirne the Idln mairrtains an 11 cars per day push rate and outputs 11 cars per day.



## '' :
~ 

## 'C COAST v .J i . "

~ _ . r

~ I'. -. .

k:.. 

### ~ pr0'u 

### ~AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT

1 Plant Interstate Brick 2 Gty West Jordan 3 Location #3 Kiln Inlet Stack 4 Operator Rick Hawkins 

### 5 Date 10/31-95

6 Stack Diameter (in) 54.16 7 Sample Box Number UT #1 8 Meter Box Number UT 790-484 9 Meter AH@ 1.719 10 Meter Calibration, Y 0.985 11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8696 12 Probe Length (ft) 8'-A 13 Probe Liner Material Stainless 14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248 15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 55 16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.41 17 Assumed Moisture (%) 3 18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.18 19 C Factor 0 20 Reference ^P (in H20) 0.3 21 Nozzle Identification Number 5/1640 22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.312 23 Thermometer Number 1-A 24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0050 25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 19.5 26 Filter Number 1-1 27 Gas Analysis 28 CO (°r6) 0 29 CO2 3.50 30 02 (%) 14.60 31 N2 (%) 81.90



# ~

### ISOKINETIC AH AH = 0.9297
constant 849.8000 AH@ 1.0000 Mds 29.1440 Mm 29.1440 

### K 3.0989 AP 0.3000 AH = 0.9297 ~7~ 

### • .
NOZZLE DIAMETER Dn = 0.312
constant 0.0357 Qm 0.75 Pb(in HG) 25.41 Pgm(in H20) -0.18 Pm 25.3968 Cp 0.8696 Tm(°F) 80 Tm(°R) 540 Bwm 0 Bws 0.03 Ts(°F) 550 Ts(

- R) 1010 Mds 29.144 Ms 28.8097 Pb(in HG) 25.41 Pgs(in H20) -0.18 Ps 25.3968 (AP)avg 0.3 Dn = 0.2992 

### PRETEST DATA

Cp 0.8696 Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 Gel H20(g) 12.0000 V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 Vm(acfl 49.2300 Ah avg 0.2000 

### Vwc 6.0155 

### Vmc 40.2742 Bws = 0.1300Sample

Point



### starting 

### 1 2 

### 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Meter Meter Stack

Temperature Temperature Temp Outlet Inlet Ts 

### ( - F) ( ° F) ('F)
66 66 535 67 77 537 66 81 538 69 89 539 67 91 540 69 79 532 70 89 537 71 97 545 72 103 551 73 106 551 76 82 540 75 89 555 76 98 556 77 105 556 78 112 560 80 85 549 81 99 556 82 106 555 83 110 549 84 118 542 Gas Volume 

### Vm (ft3) 920.352 922.58 924.96 927.5 930.16 932.53 934.71 937.3 939.99 942.64 945.03 947.34 949.71 952.2 954.85 957.59 959.82 962.12 964.65 967.26 969.882 Gas

Volume difference 

### (ft3)
2.23 2.38 2.54 2.66 2.37 2.18 2.59 2.69 2.65 2.39 2.31 2.37 2.49 2.65 2.74 2.23 2.30 2.53 2.61 2.62

avg °F avg "R

total = average = 74.10 Sample Meter Point Temperature



### Inlet (°F) 84.10

544.10

94.10 Meter Temperature Outlet (°F) 546.15

1006.15

546.15 

### Stack Temp (°F) 

### T 49.5300 49.53



### Gas Gas Volume 

### Volume 

### Vm Vm



# 9~

### Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling C1ock Vacuum

Head Diff APs Time Time nPs nH (in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 1320 

### 0.24 1.26 0.4899 3 1323 1.2 0.28 1.49 0.5292 3 1326 1.4 0.31 1.65 0.5568 3 1329 1.6 0.33 1.77 0.5745 3 1332 1.7 0.29 1.56 0.5385 3 1335 1.5 0.25 1.34 0.5000 3 1340 1.2 0.31 1.67 0.5568 3 1343 1.6 0.33 1.78 0.5745 3 1346 1.7 0.32 1.73 0.5657 3 1349 1.7 0.26 1.41 0.5099 3 1352 1.5 0.26 1.40 0.5099 3 1355 1.5 0.27 1.44 0.5196 3 1358 1.5 0.3 1.61 0.5477 3 1401 1.8 0.33 1.78 0.5745 3 1404 1.8 0.35 1.90 0.5916 3 1407 2 0.24 1.28 0.4899 3 1410 1.7 0.25 1.35 0.5000 3 1413 1.8 0.29 1.58 0.5385 3 1416 2 0.31 1.70 0.5568 3 1419 2.1 0.32 1.78 0.5657 3 1422 2.2

60 60 

### 0.2920 1.5734 0.5395 3 1369 1.67 Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Head Diff APs Time Time 

### ^Ps ^H



## -1~Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point Eadt Outlet Isoldnetics (°F) ('F) ('F)

247 245 50 42.7860 109.14 250 253 47 46.2606 106.97 252 259 46 48.7002 108.32 256 258 45 50.2718 108.99 250 262 44 47.1502 103.58 252 264 44 43.6024 103.03 250 260 44 48.6758 109.25 248 268 46 50.4226 109.60 250 266 46 49.8007 109.30 250 268 47 44.8897 108.90 247 261 48 44.6449 106.57 246 258 48 45.8353 107.55 244 259 50 48.3384 106.39 249 256 51 50.6978 107.27 251 259 51 52.3141 107.22 253 266 52 43.0860 106.88 255 265 52 44.1267 107.03 250 267 51 47.5025 108.59 252 264 51 48.9679 107.61 247 260 51 49.5785 105.26

249.95 Probe Exit Temperature (oF) 249.95

Filter Temperature ('F) 48.20

Outlet Impinger Temperature ('F) 

# W")ST T EST CALCULATIO

VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT Vm(std) = 40.3740 Vw(std) = 2.9419 Bws = 0.0679

Vm 49.5300 Vic(mis) 62.5 Vm(std) = 40.3740 Vw(std) = 2.9419

-.C:C GASE: STACK VELOCITY DRY STACK FLOW RATE Vs = 47.3 80 5 Mds = 29.1440 Q(std) = 1.1330E+6 Kp 85.49 MOL WT WET STACK GASE: Vs = 47.3805

Mws = 28.3871

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION
An = 5.3093E-4
% ISO = 107.4240

Initial Leak Check Rate Finish 919.859 Pitot Tubes Start 919.854 A = OK Rate = 0.0050 B = OK

Vac. = 19.5 Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes Finish 970.021 99 Start 970.015 B = OK Rate = 0.0060 Vac. = 17.8 PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION Cs = 6.2912E-4

Mn 25.4 Cs = 6.2912E-4 Ibs/dscf = 1.3869E-6 grains/dscf = 0.0097 lbs/hr = 1.5714



### NOx PPM = 79.07 Ibs/hr = 10.697


### CO PPM = 455.62 Ibs/hr = 37.581


### S02 PPM = 125.63 lbs/hr = 23.628


### HF mg/dscf = 7.999 Ibs/hr = 25.51



# Q~

# ,Amf--.ican EnvircnrnQr;tal Testina Ccmflany, lnc_ S6Z So uth clrch D rivQ Spanisn For' ~ 

## Utah 3 4 Eo0 (801) 2F.8-7111


## L..kB O RAT 0 FsY D ATA 

## E .`

~ 

## A MCt,7Ld v

Cosr~any: ~, y- Run Num~ef: ~ /L71 L ✓ ~ ~ .r ~.~ r 7S` , Samplirg Loc3tion:'~ 3 ~~2-?~_ ,~' -~-~ Date: /O 

### Mkistur2 CQfiected 

## lnit!a! Weicht Final 4;leicnt Weight Cain lmpir.SQr 1 6

- 36 

## 'y. 8" Impinger 2 %

~ 

### • y ~ O~ 

## . S ~~ 

## lmpinSer 3 S L/. O

~ 

### "OS ,-Z 

## ImpiNer 4

~ 

## 3a. ~ 

## f SiC ~ • ,~ ~ % 

## Tctal Cain = ~ 

### P3rtScutate Caller

- :ed 

## Frnnt - Anatysis (Nczz'e, Frcb-e, Fiitc-r ard Oyen Glazs

- ware) 1. Filter FinalWeight 2. Fitter Tare WeiSnt 3. Total Fiiter wleicl'rt 4. Particulate c3ught in noz: .Ie, prcbe and giaszware S. Tctal Frront -1-;a1! Catch © . E c ~ 

## 5—,3 -a- 6/y

- 7 C . Oi3Z


### & Oioc

)

~ 

### ?. o-:

~ 

### 3E 

## Eac:c - Hatf Aralysis (lmpinser3, ard Connec:ir.g Cli:zsware) 1. Parcfcuiate caught in imPinc,er3 ey aperated dcwn at lesz than 

# 120' F.

_ m Total Particulate Catch (Sum ct Ftcnt and 8ack - Natt Catc;

- ks)



# _. ., .._ . . ... ._ .._._.-. ~

~~

# American Environmenta! Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 (801) 255-7111



## Company:
- 

# a r lc 1L Date:

Soures: 

# jt 

# ~ JVA Run Number: 

# ~ I



## ORSAT ANALYSiS 

## (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry



## Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Carbon Dixoide Monoxide

,


# ~i ~ •e XJ 

# ~ ~ ~ I \ r



## Average r



# RlAMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT

1 Plant Interstate Brick 2 Gty West Jordan 3 Location #3 Kiln Inlet Stack Run #2 4 Operator Rick Hawkins 5 Date 10/31-95

6

~ Stack Diameter (in) 54.16 7 Sample Box Number UT #1 8 Meter Box Number UT 790-484 9 Meter AH@ 1.719 10 Meter Calibration, Y 0.985 11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8696 12 Probe Length (ft) 8'-A 13 Probe Liner Material Stainless 14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248 15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 48 16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.34 17 Assumed Moisture (°r6) 8 18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.18 19 C Factor 0 20 Reference AP (in H20) 0.3 21 Nozzle Identification Number 5/1640 22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.312 23 Thermometer Number 1-A 24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0050 25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 18.5 26 Filter Number 1-2 27 Gas Analysis 28 CO (%) 0 29 CO2 (°r6) 3.70 30 02 (%) 14.30 31 N2 (%) 82.00

W//

## .. ~ 

## mo

NOZZLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH Dn = 0.312 AH = 0.8528
constant 0.0357 Qm 0.75 Pb(in HG) 25.34 Pgm(in H20) -0.18 Pm 25.3268 Cp 0.8696 Tm(°F) 80 Tm(°R) 540 

## Bwm 0 Bws 0.08 Ts(°F) 550 

## Ts(°R) 1010 Mds 29.164 Ms 28.2709 Pb(in HG) 25.34 Pgs(in H20) -0.18 Ps 25.3268 (AP)avg 0.3 Dn = 0.2977 Cp 0.8696 Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 Gel H20(g) 12.0000 V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 Vm(acf) 49.2300 Ah avg 0.2000 Vwc 

### 6.0155 Vmc 40.1633 Bws = 0.1303 constant 849.8000 AH@ 1.0000 Mds 29.1640 

### Mm 29.1640 K 

### 2.8427 AP 0.3000 AH = 0.8528



# A~Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference ( ° F) ('F) ('F) (ft3) (ft 3 ) starting 970.852 1 69 69 542 973.03 2.18 2 69 76 547 975.29 2.26 3 70 84 550 977.62 2.33 4 70 89 549 980.06 2.44 5 70 94 550 982.28 2.22 6 71 85 544 984.47 2.19 7 71 92 544 986.86 2.39 8 72 103 552 989.32 2.46 9 72 109 551 991.73 2.41 10 72 114 538 993.98 2.25 11 74 85 505 996.35 2.37 12 73 91 509 998.65 2.30 13 74 95 512 1001.09 2.44 14 75 104 513 1003.66 2.57 15 76 109 518 1006.2 2.54 16 78 91 522 1008.5 2.30 17 .77 95 526 1010.75 2.25 18 78 98 525 1013 2.25 19 78 105 536 1015.44 2.44 20 78 113 536 1017.842 2.40

avg °F 84.20 533.45 avg °R 544.20 993.45
total 

### = 46.9900 46.99 average 

### = 73.35 95.05 533.45 Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm



# ON

### Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum

Head Diff ^Ps Time Time APs AH (in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 1630 0.23 1.11 0.4796 3 1633 1.9 0.25 1.21 0.5000 3 1636 2 0.28 1.36 0.5292 3 1639 2.1 0.31 1.51 0.5568 3 1642 2.2 0.25 1.23 0.5000 3 1645 2 0.24 1.17 0.4899 3 1650 1.9 0.29 1.43 0.5385 3 1653 2.1 0.32 1.58 0.5657 3 1656 2.2 0.29 1.44 0.5385 3 1659 2.1 0.24 1.21 0.4899 3 1702 2 0.26 1.33 0.5099 3 1706 2.2 0.25 1.28 0.5000 3 1709 2.1 0.29 1.48 0.5385 3 1712 2.4 0.33 1.70 0.5745 3 1715 2.6 0.32 1.65 0.5657 3 1718 2.6 0.24 1.22 0.4899 3 1722 2.2 0.24 1.21 0.4899 3 1725 2.2 0.28 1.42 0.5292 3 1728 2.4 0.3 1.52 0.5477 3 1731 2.5 0.27 1.38 0.5196 3 1734 2.4

60 60 0.2740 1.3724 0.5226 3 1685.75 2.21 Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Head Diff APs Time Time APs AH


# irolAmerican Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1

Balance Caiibration Data Form



### Balance Name: Satorius - A 200 S(Analytical) Number : 35120053 Balance Name: Satorius - U3600 (Top Loader) Number : 35120087 

### Classification of Standard Weights: Tvoe "S" W.B.S. Analvst: JPB - RH
A200S

Date 0.500 g 1.0000 g 10.0000 g 50.0000 g 100.0000 ca 

### 3/2/94 0.500 0.9999 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 9/6/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000 3/3/95 0.5000 1.0001 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 9/2%95 0.5 1.0001 10 50

U 3600

Date 0.50Q a 1.0000 a 10.0000 g 50.0000 a 100.0000 g 

### 3/2/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.1000 9/6/94 0.501 1.0010 10.0000 50.0001 100.0001 3/3/95 0.5000 1.00 10.00 50.00 100.00



# ~~ d

### R;,
- .* 

# E-. 0 0z; I iz Al x~ 

## •- .; -I-, - . -,;; t 

# ^~l ~~ c ~ ~ SPSCIALTY G"AS " DIVISs'CN .11711 S. AlaMeda Street p i Los Angeles, CA 90059

~ 64-57 ,11. 

# ANALYTICAL REPORT- 

# PRCOUCTC RTIFICATION
TO: Mountain Air' DATZ: 

## 31. , An 1994

gas P~



### •



## -.'tPA Pr * otocol Procedure G-1



## CYLINCEIR NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL


### CC104478 

## Nitric ox ide 50.0 PPM 53..1 FFM



## NOX 53. 

## 4 PPM Nitrogen Balance Balance

CERTIFICATION 

### PERIOD (months): 24 EXPIRATION DATE: 

### January 31, 1996 

## cylinde 

## r Pressure: 2000

- psig.. .7

- Do'

— not uie below lcu - ps- , g

•



## William L. Vernon

ML i
AN 

# 1~ 

# 3ry


# 9~ G SPECIALTY G;%S DIVISION _EZ

11711 S. 

### Alarn-da Street Los•Ange'es. 

# ~ .A 900!9 

# ANALYTiCAL RE'PORT - PRODUCT CER - TIFICAT(ON .0 

### TO: Mountain Airgas LvAtz: 3 'i994 p.0

EPA 

### Protocol Procedure G-1



### CYLINDER NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL


### CCl0514 sulfur Dioxi ! de 850 PPM 

# 901.6 Ppm .0



### Nitrogen 

### Balance Bal ance



## CERTIFICATION PERrOD (months): 36 

## EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1997 

### Cylinder Pressure'. 2000 psig 

### Do not use-below. 130 

### pzia.

i~~ 

# = ': Z]



### - -T

ANALYST 

### William L. trernon



## x

~ f j! 7 

## I - ; t

~ 

### , . ~ 

### n.

7

-4- -),I

# v~~~~ N SPECIALTY GAS DIVISIO 11 711 S. 

### Alameda Street 

### • Los Angeles. CA 90059 (213) 

### 564-5711 

# -ANALYTICAL REPORT PRODUCT CF-r"RTIFICATION
TO ,:''M .otm.tain Airgas DATE: 31 

## Jan 1994 P.0 

### NO: 

## 005422..'.

Z

### EPA 

## Protocol Procedure G-1

-C



### CYLINDER NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL


### !CC104484 Sulfur Dioxide 

### 500 

## PPM 514. 6 

## PP14 Nitrogen Balance Balance

CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 36 

### EXPIRATION DATE: 

### January 31, 1997 

### Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig 

## 'Da not uze••below - 150 

### psig



## Ec--♦ ❑ ~ 

# 0, ri,

-WW. 

## William L. ANALYST 

### Vernon 7



### ~ 

# .A11 , -) - , - v m J ~ -) , -0"- - - I
- - 1- '? 1;1. , r-.

-21 

# ` ~ ~O C ~~ SPSCIALTY GAS DIVISION 11 71 1 S. Alameda Street LaS Angeles. CA 90059 (213) 56•-571 1 

# ANALYTICAL 

# REPORT - 

# PRODUCT CERTIFICATION TO: 

## Mountain Airgas DATE: 31 J ' 

## 1994 n NO: 0 0

. 

### 5 

## a A 

### .EPA Protocol Procedure 

### G-1



### CYLINDEFt NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL
CC104461 Nitric Oxi-de 

### 85.0 PPM 86.8 PPM



### NOX 87.3 PPM Nitrogen Balance 

### Balance 3~ ~9



### CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 24 EXPIRATION 

### DATE: January 

### 31, 1996 77 -Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig 

### Do not use below 

### 150 psig

15

- 35 

## William L. Vernon

R 

## r - . 

# ENT

. N-S,111-1~~ . .

~

~~• '': /•s

~ ,- ~ Q ..•~~f~
1..•+

~ !..
~ O

_i I' •_ ~~t

~ — _ •...: i

_ a

s

Tw~~~ r • 

# ..:ry..

~~ 

# v : • i.


# ~ . ~ 

# . .. ~ 

# . _. Y

... y .._. r ._ v .,_ lwtl n)

~ l'R1vlTl
•~ 

# • v n
_ v .- _Y•

. •/r,.

... ....... . . '9

~ ., an..l+n.

~ .iwf.

~~ _m).'.

~ a).

~ .n_

~ 7

~ i^.n
~w+ • -~ 

# Y/'

. _ v
. . .• ..r.
. _. . .. _ [ M ,l ( R ,4 (l .f 'i°n

~~ n •) .N

. ~~ .)'ii>

. ` y 1. /

~ ~ 7., ' 1

~ ^ t_ ~ . ,yl,`T . ' ~~'.~ : ~~~.~~i ~~' : ~ Yt. ~i ~~ ~~~ 1 •M , Y ~ A/• 1 ~ •1 ~' • ' ~~ .'I • ~:'~ ~ 'r; /r. • ` ' r\r~l r

~ Ip' •F • •N
~

S ~ M •' ~•1 1 

# _ 1 ~?•,~~

~ M' .,•`•

- '.u~~;.~~ • ,Nli ~~• • ~jw • ~ ~4

. ) . ..r • Yi 1'\•• r'► .I ~I ~ 'l~.c~~...~J~.~l_.~ J...L

~ 1.-.
~.~ ..E'

~ :L

~ 1-.+'ei..:t

~i-~1~+~:~~-t~i~ ...'.5:...

~ `• 1D' ' '

~ aJ}-y

~ ::r__• ~.e~~.e
- i-`~ ` tta'

~ :E

~ ..:2i-+`ca1:: ~'~1~ ..

'Z'Q' t ~,~ ?:_:c . - • ; 

### Sp

~ 

### C3AL TY



# • GAS DIVISiON t ~ 

### - i

t 1 i 7' 1 S.

~ tlarneda Street 

# C
l.o°, Angeies. CA 90059 ,. ~ ..N,.

~ !

: -p~

. •



## ANALYTICAL REPORT - PRODUCT CER T iFICATi0N

~ • 

### ~~ 

### TO: Mountain Airgas

~ •w..

~

'



### DAT'1
~ 

### :
- 

### 31 ,Jan 1994

r P. O. NO . 0 QS 4 2 2-

~ rJ
... ' , • - 

# tN EPA Protocol Procedure 0-1

~ 

### . _ w

— ~ CYLINDER NO. L;;.

~ ONSTITl1ENTS CONCE

~ VTRATION: NOMINAL - ACTUAL



## -- CC15584 Carbon.Monoxide 60.0 PPM 62..7 P,PM
- Nitrogen Balance Balance ~ •+i

~ y '



### r ( 

## CERTIFICATION PERIOD (monchs): 36 EYPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1997 Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig Do not' use below 150

- psig 1 i~

, ''r' _' ~ , ' '
~ , ~ i v • r ` ~

~ '..'1"i

~ - .

, r-
. • • , ~ , `, . . . . ^~ - • ' ~

. .
l , 

### ~ '

. • .

,: •4 • . .

.-• , • ... - .
a

~ r :•^

~ '

- t ~

_ ANALYST 

## ". William L. Vernon

~ 

### I

~ :: ~ ia ii .

~ 1~ . !•. i

~ a ~ a 'a
~ Y3► i.v ': 1
~ V:iW

~~ a o 4

{a W

~ . ~ a acW:: .. !i l: i
~ : .ii ~ • a :: ~//~a~ :a ac .ia `~ •.J' )r+ . ~"'~~" ~N ~~• w' iW'
~ .y" iw'' e.,' eny' iw w'

~ w'

~ w" !ny' InY" 1N ... l.w ~ 1d".

~ wy " ~ ~~- ~p+~ Ly~ ~ ny' ~ N"iW ia

~ ..•

~ .n

~ Vrr

~ ..Ilrrl/rur,b.r.'!

~ rr/!

~ u,!bvlf ~o~ .v!ti,.,

~ '...,!'•,.,

~ f+•..?

~ ul

~ .•f•s.rr

~ /lu.!1r.s.!

~ u•a

~ •,i.!r...!h r.!b..!ti

~ !b...!lru.!r...!1u

~ .. ~ .1 i

;.~ ;

### SPErWIALTY GAS DIVISION 11711 S. Alameda Street Los Angeles. CA 90059 (213)564-5711 Z— 

## ANALYTICAL REPORT - PROOUCT CERTIFiCATION TO:Mountain Airgas DATE: 31 Jan 1994 ..P.O. -005422

EPA Protocol Procedure G-1

CYLINOEA NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCZ.NITRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL 

## CC15577 Carbon Monoxide 30.0 PPM 32.4 PPM

Nitrogen Balance Balance

CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 36 EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1997 Zylinder Pressure: 2000 Psig Do not use below 150 psig

'7



### 1;Z



## Will'iam L.Probe 

### Filter Impinger Vs Point to

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point Exit Outlet Isokinetics 

### (°F) (°F) ('F)

248 251 45 42.0908 108.78 251 256 46 43.9920 107.90 247 256 48 46.6260 104.50 250 260 48 49.0360 103.54 247 264 49 44.0575 104.42 244 267 50 43.0389 105.53 248 262 50 47.3102 104.22 256 260 51 49.8947 101.52 256 262 48 47.4748 103.85 259 256 49 42.9101 105.38 249 259 47 43.9177 107.34 249 258 47 43.1540 105.98 250 261 48 46.5501 104.16 252 261 47 49.6824 102.09 250 258 47 49.0494 102.20 244 261 45 42.5648 108.41 250 259 46 42.6514 106.00 252 262 46 46.0454 97.80 254 266 46 47.9269 102.46 256 265 47 45.4674 105.56

250.6 250.6 47.50 Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger Temperature Temperature Temperature 

### ( ° F) ( ° F) ' ('F)


# /D ~"'OST TEST _ CALCULATION
VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT Vm(std) = 38.1693 Vw(std) = 2.8571 Bws = 0.0696
Vm 46.9900 Vic(mis) 60.7 Vm(std) = 38.1693 Vw(std) = 2.8571

DRY STACK GASE:
Mds = 29.1640
MOL WT WET STACK GASE:
Mws = 28.3865

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION
An = 5.3093E-4
% ISO = 104.5039 STACK VELOCITY Vs = 45.6738 Kp 85.49 Vs = 45.6738 DRY STACK FLOW RATE Q(std) = 1.1011 E+6

PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION

Cs = 6.4188E-4
Mn 24.5 Cs = 6.4188E-4 Ibs/dscf = 1.4151 E-6 grains/dscf = 0.0099 Ibs/hr = 1.5581

NOx PPM = 77.52 Ibs/hr = 10.191
CO PPM = 445.38 Ibs/hr = 35.700

Initial Leak Check Rate Finish 970.528 Pitot Tubes Start 970.523 A = OK Rate = 0.0050 B = OK

Vac. = 18.5 Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes Finish 1017.995 99 Start 1017.988 B = OK Rate = 0.0070 Vac. = 18.6 S02 PPM = 147.92 Ibs/hr = 27.036
HF mg/dscf = 11.414 Ibs/hr = 27.71



# II'D

# Ame..r;can Fnw3rcnmes;tal Testina Ccmpany, Inc_

, 

## 56Z Sc uth L' irc: ; D rive Spanish For! , , Utah 34650 (801) 2E8-7111


## LUB40RA70F`t' DAT-A 

## E PA ?

~ 

## e tfxd S Co rrpany:
~ il-4 

## ~,~ ~C~ ~~ 

## Run Number: 2 ~-2 

## Sampling Location: ~ 

## -3 r~~ ~~~ 

## Date: /o -S i— S

impiNer 1 

## lmpincer 2 lmpinCer 3 lnit-

~ 

## al Weight Nic i ature Co llec'ed



## Final Weicht 

# 5~

~

- 

## C, co

~ - 

## CA 

## Weight Catn



# ---u-! —

~ 6 

## Irnpinc

~ 

## r 4
~ 

# 0. ? , 2

~ P ~ 

# Co ~ 

## Tctal Cain = C ~ • ( lfartict:Eate Coile

~ 

## ed 

## Front - 1-

- !aIf Ar2Iy3is (Ncz

- fe, Prcbe, Fitter ard Oven GYazsware)
1. Filter F1nai WeiSht 

## 2. Filter Tate Y+leight 3. Total Fitter WeiCht 

## 4. PartScutate caught in r4zzle, prcts ard gfassware S. TotaI Frront - t-att Catch C~ 

### C 3

~ 

### 3 7 ' /

~ 

### • 6

~ 

### /S'7 _L

~ — 

### oZ

, 

## c'?, OoS5

-

, 

## Eac'c - I-ialf Ar2ly3i3 (ImpinSerr, and Conrec:ing C12zsware) 1. PartScuiate cau5ht in impinc,er3 evaperated down at }es3 t1an 

# 120' F. 

# I 3 _ Total Particulate Catch (Sum oI',.Frant and Eac:c - N2tt.Cat

~~ 

### k s 

### ) 

# •___ _ -- -

~ 

# --. . _. . ._.. . .... .....

_ ~ 

# -AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT

1 Plant Interstate Brick 2 Gty West Jordan 3 Location #3 Kiln Inlet Stack Run #3 4 Operator Rick Hawkins 5 Date 10/31-95

6 Stack Diameter (in) 54.16 7 Sample Box Number 

# (n #1 8 Meter Box Number UT 790-484 9 Meter AH@ 1,719 10 Meter Calibration, Y 0.985 11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8696 

### 12 Probe Length (ft) 8'-A 13 Probe Liner Material Stainless 

### 14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 

### 248 15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 44 16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.3 17 Assumed Moisture (%) 8 

### 18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.18 19 C Factor 0 

### 20 Reference AP (in H20) 0.3 

### 21 Nozzle Identification Number 5/1640 

### 22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.312 

### 23 Thermometer Number 1-A 24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0060 

### 25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 19,2 

### 26 Filter Number 1-3 27 Gas Analysis 

### 28 CO (%) 0 

### 29 CO2 (%) 3.40 30 

### 02 (%) 14.90 

### 31 N2 (%) 81.70

/l4NOZZLE DIAMETER Dn = 0.312

constant 0.0357 

### Qm 0.75 Pb(in HG) 25.3 Pgm(in H20) -0.18 

### Pm 25.2868 

### CP 0.8696 Tm(°F) 80 Tm(°R) 540 Bwm 0 Bws 0.08 Ts(°F) 550 

### Ts(°R) 1010 Mds 29.14 Ms 28.2488 Pb(in HG) 25.3 Pgs(in H20) -0.18 Ps 25.2868 (AP)avg 0.3 Dn = 0.2975 PRETEST CALCULATIONS
PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH AH = 0.8528 Cp 

### 0.8696 constant 849.8000 Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 AH@ 1.0000 Gel H20(g) 12.0000 Mds 29.1400 V(H20)(mi) 127.8000 Mm 29.1400 Vm(acf) 49.2300 K 2.8426 Ah avg 0.2000 AP 0.3000 Vwc 6.0155 AH = 0.8528 Vmc 40.0999 Bws = 0.1304T Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference ('F) ("F) ('F) (ft3) (ft3) starting 18.727 1 70 70 510 20.87 2.14 2 71 76 515 23.04 2.17 3 71 81 542 25.42 2.38 4 71 90 555 27.82 2.40 5 72 95 559 30.08 2.26 6 74 85 545 32.2 2.12 7 73 92 558 34.51 2.31 8 73 99 560 36.96 2.45 9 74 108 557 

### 39.4 2.44 10 75 114 560 41.5 2.10 11 78 100 520 43.77 

### 2.27 12 77 107 532 46.13 2.36 13 77 111 540 48.54 2.41 14 78 115 542 51.06 2.52 15 78 120 550 53.53 2.47 16 79 100 542 55.72 2.19 17 80 110 544 57.96 2.24 18 81 115 550 60.33 2.37 19 81 121 552 62.79 2.46 20 81 124 560 65.05 2.26

avg °F 88.68 544.65 avg °R 548.67 1004.65

total = 46.3230 46.32 average = 75.70 101.65 544.65 Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm

!lq

### Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum

Head Diff ^Ps Time Time APs AH ; (in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 1900 

### 0.22 1.10 0.4690 3 1903 2 0.24 1.20 0.4899 3 1906 2.1 0.29 1.42 0.5385 3 1909 2.4 0.3 1.46 0.5477 3 1912 2.5 0.26 1.27 0.5099 3 1915 2.4 0.22 1.08 0.4690 3 1920 2.2 0.28 1.36 0.5292 3 1923 2.4 0.32 1.56 0.5657 3 1926 2.6

. 0.3 1.48 0.5477 3 1929 2.5

0.21 1.04 0.4583 3 1932 2.4 0.25 1.28 0.5000 3 1936 2.6 0.27 1.37 0.5196 3 1939 2.7 0.3 1.52 0.5477 3 1942 2.8 0.32 1.62 0.5657 3 1945 2.8 0.3 1.52 0.5477 3 1948 2.7 0.23 1.15 0.4796 3 1951 2.5 0.25 1.26 0.5000 3 1954 2.5 0.29 1.46 0.5385 3 1957 2.7 0.31 1.57 0.5568 3 2000 2.8 0.28 1.41 0.5292 3 2003 2.6

60 60 0.2720 1.3571 0.5205 3 1937.5 2.51 Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Head Diff APs Time Time 

### APs AH



## ~ 

# 1~ 7Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point Exit Outlet Isokinetics (°F) (°F) (°F)

247 251 48 40.5868 107.71 250 256 47 42.5007 104.09 252 265 47 47.3610 104.89 250 264 46 48.4821 103.87 255 266 46 45.2233 104.68 249 264 45 41.3126 106.68 248 260 45 46.9074 103.25 244 259 45 50.1953 101.98 245 257 46 48.5299 103.84 248 255 48 40.6628 106.23 251 258 49 43.4882 104.18 257 261 50 45.4701 104.35 255 260 50 48.1226 101.20 254 266 51 49.7504 102.17 254 267 51 48.3626 103.38 253 265 52 42.1780 105.83 250 259 54 44.0175 103.00 254 260 54 47.5497 101.04 251 260 52 49.2107 101.06 257 261 51 46.9534 97.80

251.2 251.2 48.85 Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger Temperature Temperature Temperature (°F) (°F) (°F)



# `l6POST TEST CALCULATION
VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT Vm(std) 

### = 37.2603 Vw(std) 

### = 2.9842 Bws 

### = 0.0742
Vm 46.3230 Vic(mis) 63.4 Vm(std) 

### = 37.2603 Vw(std) 

### = 2.9842

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE: STACK VELOCITY DRY STACK FLOW RATE Vs 

### = 45.8357 Mds 

### = 29.1400 Q(std) 

### = 1.0856E+6 Kp 85.49 MOL WT WET STACK GASE: Vs 

### = 45.8357
Mws 

### = 28.3139

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION
An = 5.3093E-4
% ISO = 103.4652

Initial Leak Check Rate Finish 18.361 Pitot Tubes Start 18.355 A = OK Rate = 0.0060 B = OK

Vac. = 19.2 Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes Finish 65.167 99 Start 65.162 B = OK Rate = 0.0050 Vac. = 18.6 PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION Cs 

### = 6.1191 E-4
Mn 22.8 Cs 

### = 6.1191 E-4 Ibs/dscf 

### = 1.3490E-6 grains/dscf 

### = 0.0094 Ibs/hr 

### = 1.4645

NOx PPM 

### = 82.06 Ibs/hr 

### = 10.637
CO PPM 

### = 444.65 Ibs/hr 

### = 35.142
S02 PPM 

### = 148.33 Ibs/hr 

### = 26.731
HF mg/dscf 

### = 14.422 Ibs/hr 

### = 34.52



# //I

# American Env3rtrnrnentai Tes-Zina Ccmflany, lnc. 5~ 

## Scuth Birch Drive Spanish Fvrfc, Utah 34560 (801) 2E5-7111



## LAH CRAT0 F3Y DAT.A 

## E?A Mettxd m. Company: Pun Numcer: Sampiirx.

~ 

## Lac3tian: 1 -5 /6A _ ~ 

## Gate: /O
Mc i sture Co iiec'£d 

## lniiial Welcht FinaI Weicrt YVeicht Gain impir.er

1 

# c, t) . ~ Impirxer 2 

## lmpincer 3 impitiger 4 

## Tcta 1 Ca in =
T=

~ 

### r,ic:.

~ 

### iate Ccil

~ - 

### :ed 

## Frcnt -}-'zlf Analy3is (Nczz!e, Prcba, Fiiter arw Cven Gtass

- ware) 

# SS

1. Filter Final Weight 2. Filter Tare WQiSht 

## 3. Total Fitter W$i5ht 4. Particulate c3uc,ht in noz-Ve, prcce ard gtasswwe S. Total Frcrrt -1`alf Catc:i D-72v7, . 7f r, 7 

## ©.O

~ 

## Yo O. oo

~ 

### i


## Back -1-a1f Analysis (lmpin5er3, and Conr*c:ir:g Gtsswara), 1. Partfcutate cau5;rt in impiracers evaperated c:own at less than 12 a' F. 

## Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and E,ac:c- Halr Catc:

- Rs)

. . ~ .. ..

~ 

# aa. ~

..,


# //f

### AMERICAN E?dVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCJRPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 8C1-256-71 1 1

Soanish Fork, Utah 8466C


### POST TEST BACIC HAL.c EVAPORATION

COMPANY: ~h.~=~ ~ S""e SOURCE: DATE: 

### l/- E -

ACETONE BLANK WATER BLANK Volume ot Liquic



### o?.S L' 1-lz Volume of Liquic. 

### Final Weight 

### I06• 6/S 2 ' Finai Weight I Tare Weight

/GE Tare Weight 

### Residue e' ooy/ Residue 

### ~
' RUN #1 RUN 41



### Volume of Liquic r2S"© : 

### ~ Vofume of Liquic

Color Color 

### ~ Final Weight /0,6 J9 Final Weight Tare Weight ~~E ~~ 

## a'a7 Tare Weight Residue & Blank Residue & Blank

- Blank 0 021 1 \ - Blank + Residue 

## / U•O Residue ! C~ O/O 0 ~ -- RUN :12 RUN e2 Voiume of Liquic 

### ~ So • 

### ~ Volume of Liquic

Coior Color 

### ~ Final Weight /o ? • / 1 1 -O % Final Weight 

### Tare Weight Tare Weight Residue & Blank Residue & Blank

- Blank C~ . oodi 

### Blartk Residue Residue


# ~ RUN #3 RUN a3 

### Volume of Liquic 

### as~' ~~ Volume of Liquic

Coior Color 

### Final Weight Final Weight Tare Weight

/G 7. a? `/`/Y Tare Weight 

### Residue & Blank O• 

### Residue & Blank

- Blank D• O0O% 1

— 

### - Blank Residue 

# ~ ` Residue

---- 

# ~~ ~

# American Environmenta! Testing Company, Inc56z South 8iroh Drive 

## Spanish Fori ,

Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111



## Company: 

# ~ vti f 

# ~~~~ ~r1~~C Date:

.-- 

### f 

### Source: 

# ~ ~2t~' ~ ~~ Run Number: 

# A -- _3 1

QRSAT ANALYSIS 

## (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Yolume Percent - Dry

Nitrogen Qxygen Carbo n Dixoide Carbon

Monoxide 

# 9/

- 

# -7

; 

## S1j I z

r

Average J L C'. 

# ~

lc 

# ~ iUAMERICAN EVVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 505 So. 8irch Drive 801-256-7t i'

Soanish Fork, Utah 84667
POST TEST BAClC HALF EVAPORATION

COMPANY: SOURC-C: DATE:

CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER 42 

### METl-iYLE?VE CHLORIDE DISTiLLED WATER



### BLANK -,200 

### BLANK Volume of Liquic Volume of LiquiFinai Weigtr /07 1346 7 

### Final Weigh 

### /f

- 7 5 : ~ 14 

### 1 Tare Weight /07 136 2 Tare Weighi /Y? -:

~ - a~ t2 Residue Residue 0.0002

RUN 41 

### of

~~ O ~ RUN a1 J r OD .Z 

### Volume of Liqui

~ 

### Volume Liquit

Colot ~ Coioi Final Weigh• /06 /ySs Finai Weigh a-ff/ _ Tare Weight Tare Weighl

- ~ r7J' Residue & 61an1 0. od/y Residue & Blani 0 • OOd 6



### - BIanM D_v _. .-- ~ 

### - BlanM r? c^ ~~ o
~ ? Residue _ 

### G v o i

~ 

### / `, /. y

~ Residue , ~ (F . 

# ~

-- RUN #2 RUN 42 

### Volume of Liquii '200 .,,4 

### Volume of Liqui- .5

- 0 0 •^9

Coloi Coloi 4!fQ, ~ 

### Finai Weigtr /07 

### Final Weigh /f7. o? / SS 

### Tare Weight 

### 16 7. 3V-28 - 

### Tare Weighi i?7 a/

- Y7 _ Residue & Blanl G. D o O 7 Residue & Blanl c.

- Blanit D . O _. _. r..— ~

_ - Blani ~ D • O oo ~ 

### ,. . . _......_._:.`-- Residue L? • G yU 

### 2 r' O 

### . 7,

~ 

### - ~ Residue [i. O O G ~ , RUN 43 RUN 93 

### Volume of Liquit 

### .; ~ 

### GG Volume of Liqui- 

### 5

- 00 Colot /1 1

1 , 111c Co1oi ~ Finai Weigtr 14 1 6 S

- s 39 Fnai Weigh 197 S Y S3 0 Tare Weighi /C"

i4. Tare Weight /-5 7. `/.5c2 / 

### Residue & Blani C. Oa/o 

### Residue & Blani Ci • O dC'%



### - BlanM L'% C'% 

### - Blan!' Residue n .
~~ O/o /, 

### O Residue 

### 219 \

~

t ;0AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT

1 Plant Interstate Brick Company 2 Gty West Jordan, Utah 3 Location No: 3 Brick Kiin Outlet #1 Run 4 Operator Todd Benson 5 Date 10/31-95

6 Stack Diameter (in) 60 7 Sample Box Number CR-Box 8 Meter Box Number CR#(097) 9 Meter AH@ 1.883 10 Meter Calibration, Y 1.07 11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8654 12 Probe Length (ft) 6'-Q 13 Probe Liner Material Glass 14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248 15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 55 16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.42 17 Assumed Moisture (%) 15 18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.5 19 C Factor 0 20 Reference AP (in H20) 0.115 21 Nozzle Identification Number 3/8"6 22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.368 

### 23 Thermometer Number 1-A 24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0080 

### 25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 20.8 

### 26 Filter Number K-1 27 Gas Analysis 

### 28 CO (%) 0 

### 29 CO2 (%) 5.10 30 02 (%) 14.90 31 N2 (%) 80.00



# /eo--PRETEST
NOZZLE DIAMETER 

### Dn = 0.368

constant 0.0357 

### Qm 0.75 Pb(in HG) 25.42 Pgm(in H20) -0.5 Pm 25.3832 Cp 0.8654 Tm(°F) 85 Tm(°R) 545 Bwm 0 Bws 0.15 Ts(°F) 145 Ts(°R) 605 Mds 29.412 Ms 27.7002 Pb(in HG) 25.42 Pgs(in H20) -0.5 Ps 25.3832 (AP)avg 0.115 Dn 

### = 0.3307 PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH AH 

### = 0.9276 Cp 0.8654 constant 849.8000 imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 AH@ 1.0000 Gel H20(g) 12.0000 Mds 29.4120 V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 Mm 29.4120 Vm(acfl 49.2300 K 8.0661 Ah avg 0.2000 AP 0.1150 Vwc 6.0155 AH 

### = 0.9276 Vmc 43.3653 Bws 

### = 0.1218



# 0Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference ('F) ( O F) (*F) (ft3) (ft3) starting 854.615 1 77 77 139 856.851 2.24 2 77 78 140 859.09 2.24 3 78 78 139 861.515 2.42 4 78 78 140 863.95 2.44 5 79 78 141 866.267 2.32 6 79 78 139 868.402 2.14 7 79 79 140 870.674 2.27 8 80 79 140 872.94 2.27 9 80 79 140 875.341 2.40 10 81 79 140 877.628 2.29 11 81 79 140 880.028 2.40 12 82 79 140 882.318 2.29 13 83 80 140 884.365 2.05 14 80 78 138 886.502 2.14 15 82 80 139 888.901 2.40 16 82 80 135 891.298 2.40 17 82 80 134 893.623 2.33 18 83 80 133 895.931 2.31 19 83 81 134 898.236 2.31 20 83 81 135 900.531 2.29 21 84 81 136 902.85 2.32 22 85 82 137 905.213 2.36 23 85 82 136 907.542 2.33 24 85 82 136 909.82, 2.28

avg °F 80.33 137.96 avg °R 540.33 597.96

total 

### = 55.2050 55.20 average 

### = 81.17 79.50 137.96 Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm


# 10Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling .. Clock Vacuum Head Diff ^Ps Time Time APs AH (in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 1320 0.11 1.66 0.3317 3 1323 2.1 0.115 1.73 0.3391 3 1326 2.1 0.12 1.81 0.3464 3 1329 2.2 0.12 1.81 0.3464 3 1332 2.2 0.12 1.81 0.3464 3 1335 2.2 0.11 1.66 0.3317 3 1338 2.3 0.125 1.89 0.3536 3 1341 2.3 0.12 1.82 0.3464 3 1344 2.3 0.125 1.89 0.3536 3 1347 2.4 0.12 1.82 0.3464 3 1350 2.4 0.13 1.97 0.3606 3 1353 2.4 0.12 1.82 0.3464 3 1356 2.4 0.1 1.52 0.3162 3 1408 2.6 0.11 1.67 0.3317 3 1411 2.6 0.14 2.13 0.3742 3 1414 2.6 0.13 1.99 0.3606 3 1417 2.7 0.12 1.84 0.3464 3 1420 2.7 0.12 1.84 0.3464 3 1423 2.7 0.12 1.84 0.3464 3 1426 2.7 0.125 1.92 0.3536 3 1429 2.8 0.12 1.84 0.3464 3 1432 2.8 0.125 1.92 0.3536 3 1435 2.8 0.13 2.00 0.3606 3 1438 2.8 0.1 1.54 0.3162 3 1441 2.9

72 72 0.1198 1.8226 0.3459 3 1382 2.50 Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Head Diff ^Ps Time Time APs AH

' 

# ~~Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point Exit Outlet Isokinetics (`F) ('F) ('F)

232 234 40 22.5953 103.71 234 236 40 23.1224 101.59 237 238 43 23.6001 107.56 236 240 43 23.6198 108.09 234 236 43 23.6394 102.85 233 236 43 22.5953 98.79 232 235 44 24.1068 98.68 234 237 44 23.6198 100.35 235 238 44 24.1068 104.20 236 240 44 23.6198 101.20 237 240 45 24.5842 102.07 235 239 45 23.6198 101.25 233 238 45 21.5618 98.91 231 234 42 22.5765 98.72 232 233 42 25.4910 98.12 234 234 42 24.4816 101.36 235 236 42 23.5014 102.21 236 238 43 23.4816 101.29 238 241 43 23.5014 101.17 237 241 43 24.0062 98.79 235 240 43 23.5409 101.87 234 239 44 24.0465 101.65 233 237 44 24.5021 98.18 231 235 44 21.4898 109.36

234.33 234.33 43.12 Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger Temperature Temperature Temperature ('F) (`F) ('F)



# l-R-0

### POST TE T CALCULATION

VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT Vm(std) = 49.2786 Vw(std) = 7.9360 Bws = 0.1387
Vm 55.2050 Vic(mis) 168.6 Vm(std) = 49.2786 Vw(std) = 7.9360

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE: STACK VELOCITY DRY STACK FLOW RATE Vs = 23.5423 Mds = 29.4120 Q(std) = 1.0737E+6 KP 85.49 MOL WT WET STACK GASE: Vs = 23.5423
Mws = 27.8291

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION
An = 7.3862E-4
% ISO = 101.7164 PARTICULATI 

### Cs =
Mn Cs = Ibs/dscf = grains/dscf = Ibs/hr = : CONCENTRATION

6.6763E-4
32.9 6.6763E-4 1.4719E-6 0.0103 1.5803

NOx PPM = 23.4 Ibs/hr = 3.000
CO PPM = 461.14 Ibs/hr = 36.045

Initial Leak Check Rate Finish 854.499 Pitot Tubes Start 854.491 A = OK Rate = 0.0080 B = OK

Vac. = 20.8 Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes Finish 909.889 A = OK Start 909.882 B = OK Rate = 0.0070 Vac. = 19.5 S02 PPM = 0.45 Ibs/hr = 0.080
HF mg/dscf = 0.00834 Ibs/hr = 0.0198



# ~~ 

# -1

# American Environrnental Tas-Ling Company, Inc_ 565 So uth E irc:1 D rive 

## Spanish Fori<, Utah 8450 , 0 (801) 2e6-7111

LAS ORLAT0 RY DATA 

## EPA Methcd 5 Company: Run Number: _4 1 /
~ 

## Sampiing Location: ~-~ ~ 

### ~u~ ~~'~ 

## Date:
Moisture Coilec3ed 

## initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain Impinger.l 5

- 9-5' 

## ~ 70 6 

# . o - Impinger 2 

## 606. ' D 

## Es9. 6 S3 y Impinger 3 

## y 70. y

~ 

## '7i . 3 

# Dv impinger 4 

## 7 7y7 % yC; ~ 

## Total Gain = /6~~ 6


### ' Particutate Coilected 

## Front - Halt Analysis (Nozz:e, Probe, Fiiter and Oven Giassware) 1. Fitter Final Weight 2. Fiiter Tare Weight 3. Total Filter Weight 

## 4. Particulate caught in nozzie, probe and glassware 5. Total Front - Hatt Catctt Cl.6s67 O G. ~ O - o- - Ao/
C
~ . C7/o?o2 

## Back - F',alf Analysis (impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 1. Partkuiate caught in impingers 

## evaporated down at less than 120 0 F. 

## Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and Back - Halt Catches) 

# 3a . 1 7

` C
~ 

# ' r

# American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

~~ 

## Company: • 

## ~ 

## Date: /4 ' 13 , /— 1 5 

## ~~ _
Source: #3 /(r 

# ~ ~~~ ~ Run Number:

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

## (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Carbon Dixoide Monoxide / 

# ?o. o f

~ 

# '. s l

~ 

# o /

71 10 

## go . 0,
~

( 

# ?o . c-o 1 Average
~ j

~ 

# o j



# 19AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT

1 Plant Interstate Brick Company 2 Gty West Jordan, Utah 3 Location No. 3 Brick Kiln Outlet #2 Run 4 Operator Todd Benson 5 Date 10/31-95

6 Stack Diameter (in) 60 7 Sample Box Number CR-Box 8 Meter Box Number CR#(097) 9 Meter AH@ 1.883 10 Meter Calibration, Y 1.07 11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8654 12 Probe Length (ft) 6'-Q 13 Probe Liner Material Glass 14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248 15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 55 16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.35 17 Assumed Moisture (%) 14 18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.5 19 C Factor 0 20 Reference AP (in H20) 0.115 21 Nozzle Identification Number 3/8"6 22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.368 23 Thermometer Number 1-A 24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0060 25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 20 26 Filter Number K-2 27 Gas Analysis 28 CO (%) 0 29 CO2 (%) 5.10 30 02 (%) 14.50 31 N2 (%) 80.40



# 13 CD

# Amefican Environmental Testing Company, Inc54~ 

## So uth Birch D rive Spanish Foric, Utah 84664 (80 1) 258-7111

~ 

## Company: 

# _l_ v ~ ~ 

# ef S ~, ~~ i c~~ 

## Date: 

# 10/

Source: ~`~ T~~t~ 

## " lC ~ ~~ 

### Run Number: 

# ~

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

## (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Voiume Percert - Dry



## Nitrogen Qxygen Carbo n Dixo ide 

## Carbon

Monoxide 

# + ~ ~



# 32 o . Average



# ~ , 7 G 

# ` l 

# ~~ •'PRETEST CALCULATIONS
NOZZLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH Dn = 0.368 AH = 0.9456
constant 0.0357 Qm 0.75 Pb(in HG) 25.35 Pgm(in H20) -0.5 Pm 25.3132 Gp 0.8654 Tm(°F) 85 Tm(°R) 545 Bwm 0 Bws 0.14 Ts(°F) 145 Ts(°R) 605 Mds 29.396 Ms 27.8006 Pb(in HG) 25.35 Pgs(in H20) -0.5 Ps 25.3132 (AP)avg 0.115 Dn = 0.3307 Cp 0.8654 Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 Gel H20(g) 12.0000 V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 Vm(acf) 49.2300 Ah avg 0.2000 Vwc 6.0155 Vmc 43.2460 Bws = 0.1221 constant 849.8000 AH@ 1.0000 Mds 29.3960 Mm 29.3960 K 8.2227 AP 0.1150 AH = 0.9456



# /3 vSample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Vollume Volume

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference (°F) (°F) (°F) (ft3) (ft3) starting 910.205 1 85 84 137 912.111 1.91 2 84 85 135 914.129 2.02 3 85 85 138 916.375 2.25 4 86 85 132 918.523 2.15 5 85 85 136 920.641 2.12 6 85 85 137 922.702 2.06 7 86 85 138 924.965 2.26 8 86 85 133 927.198 2.23 9 86 85 133 929.416 2.22 10 85 84 133 931.597 2.18 11 85 85 134 933.663 2.07 12 85 85 134 935.851 2.19 13 86 85 135 938.076 2.22 14 84 83 136 940.122 2.05 15 85 83 135 942.237 2.11 16 85 84 135 944.401 2.16 17 85 84 134 946.619 2.22 18 86 85 135 948.764 2.14 19 86 85 135 950.815 2.05 20 86 85 136 952.905 2.09 21 87 85 136 955.033 2.13 22 87 85 137 957.202 2.17 23 87 86 136 959.34 2.14 24 86 86 136 961.476 2.14

avg °F 85.15 135.25 avg °R 545.15 595.25
total 

### = 51.2710 51.27 average 

### = 85.54 84.75 135.25 Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Point



### . Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm



# 133Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Head Diff ^Ps Time Time ^Ps AH (in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 1630 0.099 1.55 0.3146 3 1633 2.2 0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1636 2.2 0.13 2.03 0.3606 3 1639 2.5 0.11 1.74 0.3317 3 1642 2.5 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1645 2.6 0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1648 2.6 0.13 2.04 0.3606 3 1651 2.6 0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1654 2.6 0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1657 2.7 0.115 1.81 0.3391 3 1700 2.8 0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1703 2.8 0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1706 2.9 0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1715 3.1 0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1718 3.1 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1721 3.1 0.115 1.81 0.3391 3 1724 3.2 0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1727 3.2 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1730 3.2 0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1733 3.3 0.105 1.65 0.3240 3 1736 3.4 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1739 3.4 0.115 1.81 0.3391 3 1742 3.5 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1745 3.5 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1748 3.5

72 72 0.1116 1.7546 0.3338 3 1695.5 2.94 Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Head

. Diff APs Time Time APs AH



# 134Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point Exit Outlet Isokinetics 

## ('F) (`F) ('F)

239 240 39 21.5893 94.81 241 241 39 21.6617 99.72 238 239 40 24.7603 97.62 236 238 40 22.6616 100.83 235 238 40 22.7380 99.83 236 239 40 21.6980 101.93 239 241 41 24.7603 98.28 240 242 41 23.6892 100.48 242 244 42 23.6892 99.81 244 245 42 23.1905 100.38 242 244 42 21.6435 101.92 239 241 43 23.7092 98.61 234 235 43 23.7292 100.29 233 235 43 21.6799 101.34 234 236 44 22.7189 99.76 236 239 45 23.2295 99.77 238 240 45 23.7092 100.04 240 241 45 22.7189 100.94 241 242 46 21.6617 101.19 242 244 47 22.2152 100.73 239 241 47 22.7380 100.15 238 239 47 23.2686 99.94 237 238 48 22.7380 100.55 235 237 48 22.7380 100.53

238.25 238.25 43.21 Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger Temperature Temperature Temperature 

## ('F) ('F) ('F)



# 15 

# ~

### POST TEST CALCULATION

VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT Vm(std) = 45.2297 Vw(std) = 9.4940 Bws = 0.1735

Vm 51.2710 Vic(mis) 201.7 Vm(std) = 45.2297 Vw(std) = 9.4940

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE:

Mds = 29.3960
MOL WT WET STACK GASE:

Mws = 27.4189 STACK VELOCITY Vs = 22.8724 Kp ' 85.49 Vs = 22.8724 

### DRY STACK FLOW RATE Q(std) = 1.0028E+6

1SOKINETIC CALCULATION

An = 7.3862E-4

% ISO = 99.9607

Initial Leak Check Rate Finish 910.148 Pitot Tubes Start 910.142 A = OK Rate = 0.0060 B = OK



### Vac. = 20 Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes Finish 961.799 A = OK Start 961.792 B = OK Rate = 0.0070 Vac. = 19.1 PARTICULATI CONCENTRATION Cs = 8.0699E-4


### Mn 36.5 Cs = 8.0699E-4 Ibs/dscf = 1.7791 E-6 grains/dscf = 0.0125 Ibs/hr = 1.7841



### NOx PPM = 19.54 Ibs/hr = 2.340


### CO PPM = 409.35 Ibs/hr = 29.884


### S02 PPM = 0.34 Ibs/hr = 0.057


### HF mg/dscf = 0.0072 

### Ibs/hr = 0.016

< ~ q&

# Amefican Enwironrnental Testing Cornpany, Inc_ 565 So uth Birctt D rive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84560 (801) 266-7111


## LA8ORATaRY DATA 

## EPA Method 5 Company: Run Number: Sampiing Location: /~'~ 

### D~ ~~ Date: Mbisture Coilected 

## Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain Impinger 1 

## 7dC .'

~ 

## ' y Impinger 2 & I Qs 7 f~ 

## ?-5 1- 6

~ 

## ?/. 9 Impinger 3 

## q7/,

~ 

## / R. / impinger 4 

## 75 7 D 7 '

~ 

## . 7 Total Gain = 

## v?0 j, 7 Particufate Coilected 

## Front - Haif Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Fiiter and Oven Glassware)
1. Fitter Final Weight 

## 2. FiRer Tare Weight 3. Total Filter Weight 4. Partkutate caught in nozzle, probe and glassware S. Total Front - Half Catch 

## O• E.

~ 

## '%. ~ 

## lJ . 6 (7) S" y jL_ ~ 

## D oRE tz 

## G, oo9y D•~~Ss 

## Back - Haft Analysis (impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 1. Partfculate caught In impingers evaporated down at less than 120° F. 

## 0.7 Total Part(cuiate Catch (Sum of Front and Back - Half Catcttes)

, 

# 131

## American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266

- 

### 7111



### Company: 

## Date: /
~ o •- -?/ - SS



## Source: ~`3 ~u ~ 

# Ou&I Run Number:

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

## (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Carbon Dixoide Monoxide 

# S,

~ 

# z

~ 3



### Average



# 13tAMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT

1 Plant Interstate Brick Company 2 Gty West Jordan, Utah 3 Location No. 3 Brick Kiln Outlet #3 Run 4 Operator Todd Benson 

### 5 Date 10/31-95

6 Stack Diameter (in) 60 7 Sample Box Number CR-Box 8 Meter Box Number CR#(097) 9 Meter AH@ 1.883 10 Meter Calibration, Y 1.07 11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8654 12 Probe Length (ft) 6'-Q 13 Probe Liner Material Glass 14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248 15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 55 16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.32 17 Assumed Moisture (°r6) 14 18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.5 19 C Factor 0 20 Reference AP (in H20) 0.115 21 Nozzle Identification Number 3/8"6 22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.368 23 Thermometer Number 1-A 24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0060 25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 20.2 26 Filter Number K-3 27 Gas Analysis 28 CO 0 29 CO2 (%) 4.90 30 02 (°r6) 14.90 31 N2 (9'0) 80.20



# i~PRETEST CALCULATIONS
NOZZLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH Dn = 0.368 AH = 0.9456

constant 849.8000 AH@ 1.0000 Mds 29.3800 Mm 29.3800 K 8.2223 AP 0.1150 AH = 0.9456 constant 0.0357 

### Qm 0.75 Pb(in HG) 25.32 Pgm(in H20) -0.5 Pm 25.2832 Cp

. 0.8654 Tm(°F) 85 Tm(°R) 545 Bwm 0 Bws 0.14 Ts(°F) 145 Ts(

- R) 605 Mds 29.38 Ms 27.7868 Pb(in HG) 25.32 Pgs(in H20) -0.5 Ps 25.2832 (AP)avg 0.115 Dn = 0.3306 Cp 0.8654 Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 Gel H20(g) 12.0000 V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 Vm(acf) 49.2300 Ah avg 0.2000 Vwc 6.0155 Vmc 43.1948 

### Bws = 0.1222



# /0Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Voiume

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference ('F) ( O F) (*F) (ft3) (ft3) starting 962.016 1 84 84 138 963.972 1.96 2 84 84 137 966.057 2.08 3 85 84 136 968.341 2.28 4 84 84 138 970.398 2.06 5 84 84 137 972.522 2.12 6 85 85 134 974.624 2.10 7 85 84 135 976.852 2.23 8 85 84 136 979.002 2.15 9 85 85 136 981.096 2.09 10 85 85 134 983.168 2.07 11 85 85 134 984.896 1.73 12 86 85 135 987.009 2.11 13 86 85 131 989.327 2.32 14 84 85 136 991.471 2.14 15 85 84 134 993.659 2.19 16 86 85 134 995.813 2.15 17 86 85 135 998.036 2.22 18 86 85 136 1000.102 2.07 19 86 85 135 1002.331 2.23 20 86 85 135 1004.464 2.13 21 86 85 135 1006.683 2.22 22 87 85 136 1008.836 2.15 23 87 85 136 1010.938 2.10 24 88 86 137 1013.084 2.15

avg °F 85.06 135.42 avg °R 545.06 595.42

total = 51.0680 51.07 average = 85.42 84.71 135.42 Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Point

. Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm



# ,~ 

# i

### Vefocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum

Head Diff APs 

### Time Time APs AH (in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 1900 0.099 1.55 0.3146 3 1903 3.3 0.105 1.64 0.3240 3 1906 3.3 0.13 2.04 0.3606 3 1909 3.3 0.1 1.56 0.3162 3 1912 3.4 0.11 1.72 0.3317 3 1915 3.4 0.105 1.65 0.3240 3 1918 3.5 0.125 1.96 0.3536 3 1921 3.5 0.11 1.72 0.3317 3 1924 3.5 0.105 1.65 0.3240 3 1927 3.5 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1930 3.5 0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1933 3.6 0.115 1.81 0.3391 3 1936 3.6 0.125 1.98 0.3536 3 1945 3.8 0.11 1.72 0.3317 3 1948 3.9 0.115 1.81 0.3391 3 1951 3.9

- 

### 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1954 3.9

0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1957 3.9 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 2000 4.1 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 2003 4.1 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 2006 4.1 0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 2009 4.2 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 2012 4.2 0.105 1.65 0.3240 3 2015 4.2 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 2018 4.2

72 72 0.1112 1.7473 0.3333 3 1952.1666667 3.75 Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Head

. 

### Diff APs Time Time APs AHProbe Filter Impinger 

### Vs Point to

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point E)at Outlet Isoldnetics (°F) 

### (°F) (°F)

236 239 38 21.6083 97.00 238 239 38 22.2349 100.34 240 241 39 24.7200 98.72 241 243 39 21.7172 101.51 241 242 39 22.7581 99.89 239 240 39 22.1790 100.76 238 238 39 24.2196 98.11 236 237 39 22.7391 100.95 234 235 39 22.2163 100.54 231 233 40 22.7009 97.05 230 233 40 21.6445 84.86 232 234 40 23.2306 96.82 237 242 42 24.1380 101.58 238 242 43 22.7391 100.67 239 243 43 23.2111 100.33 240 243 38 22.7009 100.82 238 240 39 23.7303 99.74 237 239 39 22.7391 96.86 235 237 39 22.7200 104.41 234 235 40 22.7200 99.92 236 236 40 23.7303 99.56 237 239 40 22.7391 100.86 238 240 40 22.2163 100.77 240 241 41 22.7581 100.47

236.88 236.88 39.71 Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger Temperature Temperature Temperature 

### ( ° F) (°F) (°F)



# ibl 

# ~POST TEST CALCULATION
VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT Vm(std) 

### = 45.0035 Vw(std) 

### = 9.1975 Bws 

### = 0.1697
Vm 51.0680 Vic(mis) 195.4 Vm(std) 

### = 45.0035 Vw(std) 

### = 9.1975

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE:
Mds = 29.3800
MOL WT WET STACK GASE:
Mws = 27.4489 STACK VELOCITY Vs = 22.8384 Kp 85.49 Vs = 22.8384 DRY STACK FLOW RATE Q(std) = 1.0044E+6

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION
An = 7.3862E-4
% ISO = 99.2984

Initial Leak Check Rate Finish 961.901 Pitot Tubes Start 961.895 A 

### = 

### OK Rate 

### = 0.0060 B 

### = 

### OK

Vac. 

### = 20.2 Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes Finish 961.799 A 

### = 

### OK Start 961.792 B 

### = OK Rate 

### = 0.0070 Vac. 

### = 19.1 PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION Cs 

### = 6.6217E-4

Mn 29.8 Cs 

### = 6.6217E-4 Ibs/dscf 

### = 1.4598E-6 grains/dscf 

### = 0.0102 Ibs/hr 

### = 1.4663

NOx PPM 

### = 24.58 Ibs/hr 

### = 2.948
CO PPM 

### = 420.32 Ibs/hr 

### = 30.735
S02 PPM 

### = 0.34 Ibs/hr 

### = 0.057
HF mg/dscf 

### = 0.00673 Ibs/hr 

### = 0.0149



# /w

# American Environ,:nental Tas

- ting Carnpany, Inc_ 5c5 So uth Birc.h D rive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 ($01) 2e6-7111


## LASORATOt`3Y DATJ1 

## EPA Methcd 5 Co mpany: 

# g'Z

~ 

# at'

~



# _ Run Num ber: 

## Sampling Lxation: #3 

## Date:
Nloisture Coilec3ed 

## initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain tmpinger 1 

## S9Z_ 3 777, ,i ~ 

### /ss/ . 3 - Impinger 2 V/'0"9.

~ 

### / 

### 6/

- 2. / 

### Impinger 3 71. 

## yZ , ?.

~ 

## r >, / Impinger 4 

## go 6 • 7 

## Total Gain

, 

## Pariicufate Coltecied 

## Front - Half Analysis (Nozzie, Probe, Fiiier and aven Grassware)
1. Fitter Finat itVeight 2. Ftlter Tare Weight 

## 3. Total Fiiter Weight 4. Particvlate caught in nozzle, probe and giassware S. Total Frront - Half Catcfi D• 6aaI-e 

### 0, 601V ?

- 

### 0 . D l.F



## Back - Half Analysis (impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 1. Pariicutate caught in impingers 

## evaporated down at iess than 120° F. 

# D ~ 

## Total Partitulate Catch (Sum of Fr+ont and Back.-.Halt Catches)

-- .......... ... . .. .. . ... ..... . ... --

~ 

## - _.

## American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

Company: AZ4,,,Z 

# ~ - Date: !D - .3 / .- 9 5' -



### Source: i#3 ~~. C~~~ ~-1 

### Run Number: co

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

## (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Carbon Dixoide Monoxide

~


### Average



## /4/6

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660


### POST TEST BACX HALF EVAPORATION

COMPANY: 

### A ~ ~ SOURCE: Gi'zv"' A Z DATE: //- 6 

### 5S ACETONE BLANK WATER BLANK 

### Volume of Liquic ~~ ~ 

### Volume of Liquic Finai Weight 

### /01/

~ 

### l-S- ~~ Final Weight Tare Weight Tare Weight 

### Residue Residue

RUN #1 RUN #1 Volume of Liquic 

### ~- 5
~ ' 

### ~ Volume of Liquic

Color 

### ~ Color Final Weight 

### lo7. JSyO Final Weight Tare Weight /D 72 4 // 7 Tare Weight Residue & Blank Residue & BIanN



### - Blank Blank Residue 

# a ~ Residue ._- RU.N #2 

### a~ y~ RUN #2 Voiume of Liquic Volume of Liquic

Color 

### f4 2

~ Color Final Weight lO ~ 7

- 3 V 7 Final Weight Tare Weight 

### 106. - 7.?5-a Tare Weight Residue & Blank 

### U OO 9- 5- Residue & Blank



### - Blank 

### O oOo/ - Blank Residue 

### O 0 0 2y

. Residue

1 ~ —. _. ..

~ .. _. . _ .... ... . . . RUN #3 RUN #3 Volume of Liquic _Qs0 

### ~ Volume of Liquic

Color Color 

### Final Weight 

### /C6 , kaZ y6 Final Weight Tare Weight /nd • 572 -3-7 -- - Tare Weight Residue & Blank Ct l l 3 Residue & Blank

- Blank 

### O. 000/

__ 

# _ _ - Blank Residue 0. 0112 Residue ) 7. '



# 1~ 

# 1

### AMERICAN ETIVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-71 1 1



### Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
POST TEST BAClC HALF EVAPORATION

COMPANY: SOURCE: 14 "3 f~44 

### DATE: %/' ,4 ~ • - y~

CONTAINER #1 

### METHYLENE CI-iLORIDE



### BLANK Voiume of Liquio ado » `~ Finai Weigh• /D 7 - - Tare Weight /''

i7 Residue /' • (o e) Uc-~ CONTAINER 42 

### DISTILLED WATER


### BLANK Voiume of Liqui , .S 00 1-1Z 

### Finai Weigh Tare Weight /97 Residue C' " ODCS-:

RUN 91 /f RUN #1 Volume of Liquii Volume

Coloi Finai Weigh• _ 

### %6 E 4

-2 ysC> Tare Weight Q i i"17

-, Residue & Blanl G' Residue

- Blanit O 

### Residue C' • 000.3 ~ O •,~ ~
RUN #2 RUN #2 Volume of Liquit

~ 'yc- "'9 Volume of Liquu 50~ ✓ +~

Colo[ Coloi Final WeiglT / 9 Final Weigh /of- 7 1fs9P

### Tare Weighl /06 21 4 ~2 

### Tare Weighi zfSS/ Residue & Blani O 0002 Residue & Blanl C• GOG 7

- BIanN D a 

### _- ---~ ~ . - B1anM l' 0r7 0 2 Residue D OoU

~ 2 Residue O• 00457 •


### RUN #3 Volume ot Liquit 

### 00 >^^ 

### ~

Colof ~

— Final Weigh• 

### /O ~ 

### . f'

lS.12 0 Tare Weight



### 14 1 6 o

cS n 2g Residue & Blanl CO Doo.?

- BlanM 

### Residue r^i • ODd? 4 " l ~ • v 

## ~ `~ 

## ~

~ 

### ----_-----/'_" _ RUN #3 Volume of Liqui- -5 - y0 :.k0

Coloi 6&1 1_ Final Weigh ]87 9

~ 3.

~ / Tare Weight /? 1 7 Residue & Blanl 0 • OG 0.3



### - BIanM c70 o

~ 2 --- --• - -1 Residue



### /~ 

# /d7 of Liqui. Coloi ILL

~~ Final Weigh 1Y7 -5/Z Y Tare Weight

, & Blani O - BIanM C' Residue (fl• o 0 os' :''

### American tnvironmental I esting Company, inc. 565 South Birch Drive

~ 

### Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
Er,=, r

- !etnoc C C ,

. 

### , , c'cnic F;ow De:e.=n,a;:c

- 1

P?ant. ~i~~2~ R:.n Nc


### Locat

~ 

### on: 

### -~3 ~.~ 

## 0~~~ ;P~~.-~ operatcr: 

### 7 - 

## 15 X 9 Z

Date: %O - — SS

~ Amb Temp. 'F:
2aro. Pressure: 

## PS Static Pressure: Pitot T ube (C:,;: C. 

### J; :6 S` e Stac: Dimens,ens: 

### 60

Traverse Point Numner Velocity head

(oPs) In H20 Stac; Temperature r Cyclonic Flow Determination

c.Ps at 0' 

### Reference Angle wh•icn yielas a 

### null cP

1 I ~ C~ • C~ 3 I 5~ I 

### ' o• i ~ I 

## I o. ~~ I ~' 

## i

C7 i
6 

### 0.0 c ~



## I . / I 

## I • ~~ ~ 

### iG 0.12 I 

### I O• 0. I 3 i



# , .!. I I o. v z ! ~ 

## / 1 

## Z o, •y I o.c/ I I

1 

### 3 • 12 

## 3 i

16 D• i ~ i p 

### ~ C7 I
rg 

### 12 I 0.0 

## -sz

~ 

### z ,~~ •~ I 

### I

. c

~ 

### . I 3 I

0.13 

## i 0. o. I L I I I I 

## I 17,16ri ZrG i I I I I I Average Ar

~ g 1 e: IC, / J



## i LA

# Appendix "E"

(Emissions Calculations)



# 10~ 

# mE <<can Cr_cTc:

-

zonm,-zrzfaf



# ~ 7Ei RncJ Com# ar_5, 

# ~ nc.

/ 

### , r-, / 

### . 7O~ G C Oflt.'2 L

^ C t C.'2 .~ iLC•E c.C/.2ani: ~ `~~~

z, 2L ~a~ 

### 466o
80 1 - 79 , y- S553



## Nomenclature for Particulate Calculations

m 1 

### EngJish Units Metric Units DescrigtiQn
A s in 2 m2 Stack Area

Can gr/dscf' g/dscrn' Particulate - probe, cyc:one and filter

Cao gr/dscf' g/dscm' Particulate - tota(


### C at gr/CF g/m 3 Particulate - probe, cyione and fitter

@ stack conditions

Cau gr,'CF g/m 3 Particutate - tctal

(g) stac:c condPtions 

### C aw Ibs/hr kg/hr Particulate - probe, cycione and filter
C aX Ibs/hr kg/hr Particulate - total
C p Pitot Tube CaJibration Factor
D n in m Sampiing Noz:le Diameter
°%EA Percent Excess AIr at sampling point

g 32.2 ft/s 2 9.81 m/s2 Acceieration of gravity
%1 Percent isokinetic 

### %M Percent moisture in stack gas by Volume
M d Mole faction of dry gas

' 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (790 mm Hg, 20 0 C)



### c%ltva"u 7Os-yS6-

~~ .: o

~~ = = ;- =

~~ r Y01-'166- ~„f ~C/~s 

### a 4m



### - 1221 

### Fntslish Units Metric Units Descri,Btion
Mf mg mg Particulate

- 

### prcbe, cyclone and filter

MH2O 18 Ib/Ib-mole Molecular Weight of Water

m t mg mg Particulate

- 

### tctal
MW Ib/Ib-mole g/g-mole Molecular Weight of wet stack gas

MW 

### air 28.95 Ib/Ib-mole Molecular Weight of air

MW 

### d Ib/lb-mole g/g-mole Molecuiar Weight of dry stack gas
P b "Hg Absolute mm Hg Barometric Pressure
P m "H20 mm H20 Orifice Pressure Drop
P s "Hg Absolute mm Hg Stack Pressure pP "H20 mm H2o Veiocity Head of stack gas
Pstd "29•92 "H9 760 mm Hg Standard Barometric Pressure
Q d 

### ACFM m 3/ h r Stack Gas Volume at Actual Stack condition


# o s DSCFM' dscm/hr' Stack Gas Volume at 29.92 "Hg, 528°R,dry
R 21.83 "Hg- Universal Gas Consant

ft3/Ib-mole°R
T m °F °C Average Gas Meter Temperature
T t min min Net Time of test
T s °F °C Stack Temperature

Tstd 528°R 293 K Standard Temperature

V m ft 3 m3 Volume of dry gas sampled at meter condtions
V m std dscf' dscm' Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions
V s 

### fpm misec Stack velocity at stack conditions
V w m I m 1 Total water collected in impingers and

' 

### 29.92 "Hg, 528°R (790 mm Hg, 20° C) silica gel



# 10

## sy- M



## - 170 

## - 1 Enaiish Uni#s Metric Units Descri t o ion



### Vwgas s c f s c m' Volume of water vapor collected at standard canditions

Pair 0.0748 Ibslft 3 Density ofAir
pH20 1 g/ml Density of water



### Pman 51.63 Ibs/f1 3 Denisty of manometer oil

Standard CondPtions: 29.92 "Hg, 68°F (760 mm Hg, 20° C) ' 29.92 "Hg, 528°R (760 mm Hg, 20° C)



# /5~

### Example Particulate Calculations

1. Volume of Dry Gas sampled at standard conditions.`

Vm std = Vm Pb +(Pm/13.61



### [ , Ts*,d 

### m + 460] [ Pstd 

# ~
Vm std = 17.65 x Vm (— Pb +(Pm/13.6) 

# ~ L Tm + 460 = dscf
Vm std = dscf x 0.028317 = dscm


### 2. Voiume of water vapor collected at standard conditions.'

Vw gas = (Vw - gms S02 - gms H2S) P H20 x R x Tstd P std x M H20 x 453.6

. Vw gas = 0.0472 x(Vw - gms S02 - gms H2S) = scf
Vw gas = scf x 0.028317 = scrn



### : 3. Percent moisture in stack gas. Vw gas %,'1= [Vms;d+Vwgas x 100 =°'°

4. Mole fraction of dry gas.

Md = 100 - %M

100 

### S. Average molecular weight of dry stacic gas.

MW = r. 

### 0O2 

# x 1 0~ +r%02 x100 ~ +r %N2 x 28 0 

# ~ + r%CO x 100] = glgmoe le 

# t L L L

6. Molecular weight of stack gas.

MW = MWd x Md + 184 (1 - Md) = Ib = g/g-mole Ib-mole


### 7. Percent excess air at sampling point.

%EA = 100 (%02 - 0.5% CO)

0.265 (%N2) - (%02) + 0.5 (%CO) ' 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (760 mm Hg, 20° C)



## /~~8. Stac4c pressure.
Ps = Pb + F stack pressure "H20 

# ~ _ "Hg Absolute

L 13.6 Ps ="Hg Absolute x 25.4 = mm Hg



### 9. Stack velocity at stack conditions.

Vs= Cpx60x2gxPmanxP s tdxMWairx(Ts+460)xoPs 

# ~ 1/2

1 12 x P air x Ps x MW x T std
Vs = 5123.8 x Cp x(" (Ts + 460) x OPs I 1/2 = fpm



# L PsxMW
Vs = fpm x 0.00508 = m/second



### 10. Dry stack gas volume at standard conditions.'

as= 1 xVsxAsxMdx Tstd x Ps 144 Ts + 460 P s td
Qs - 0.123 x Vs x As x Md x Ps = DSCFM

. Ts + 460 Os = DSCPM x 1.6990 = dscmihr.


### 11. Actual stack gas volume at stack conditions.

ca = Vs x As



### = ACFM 144 

### Qa = ACFM x 1.6990 = m 3 /hr
12. Percent isokinetic.

%I = Vm std x(Ts + 460) x P std x 100 x 14A 

### aDn 2 MdxTstdxPsxTtxVsx 4
%I = 1039 X Vm std x(Ts + 460) Md x Ps x Tt x Vs x Dn 2

' 29.92 "Hg, 528°R (760 mm Hg, 20° C)



# 1v~~

### 13. Particulate - probe, cycicne and filter.
Can = mf x

~

1 o ` r _ Vm std 64.8 mg Can = 0.0154 x mf = gr/dscf'

Vm std Can = gr/dscf x 2.290 = g/dscm'


### 14. Particulate total.

Cao = 0.0154 x mt = gridscf'



### V m std Cao = gr/dscf x 2.290 = g/dscm' 

### 15. Particulate - probe, cyclone and fiiter at stack conditions.

Cat = Can x Ps x (T std) x Md

_ Ps std (Ts + 460) Cat = 17.65 x Can x Ps x Md = gr/CF

Ts + 460 Cat = gr/CF x 2.290 = g/m 3 

### 16. Particulate - total at stack conditions.

Cau = 17.65 x Cao x Ps x Md = gr/CF

Ts + 460 Cau = gr/CF x 2.290 = g/m 3 

### 17. Particulate - probe, cyc!one and filter.

Caw = Can x os x 60 min x 1 Ib 1 hr 7000 gr Caw = 0.00857 x Can x Qs = Ibs/hr Caw = Ibs/hr x 0.4536 = kg/hr


### 18. Particulate - total.

Cax = 0.00857 x Cao x Os = Ibs/hr Cax = Ibs/hr x 0.4536 = kg/hr

' 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (760 mm Hg, 20° C)



# i~~

# Appendix "F"

(Data-Logger Sheets)

c4mE , tican (EtzcrizonmEnEaf 7eiEin9 Comf2arzy gnc.

GI 

### ~ eno, GNevada f ( Pizocnix, o42i.zorza 

### Za['t %'a

~ 

### ,_ eLt y , 2(Ea4
702-786-8553 6 o 2

- 2 53-3354 8or-266-7111



### /L 

## ~ _f Y

# Appendix "F"

(Data-Logger Sheets)



# ~5~Company: Interstate Brick Date: 10/31-95

Source: Kiln #3 Outlet Sample Gas: NOx 

### Span: 100

Analvzer Caiibration Cylinder Analyzer Absoiute Difference Value Response Difference (% of span) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 0 -0.2 0.20 0.20 53.4 53.2 0.20 0.20 87.3 87.2 0.10 0.10

Svstem Calibration Analyzer System Absolute Difference Response Response Difference (;% of span) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) -0.2 0.4 0.60 0.60 na na 0.00 0.00 87.2 87.6 0.40 0.40

- 5amole Svstem Bias #1 Initial Final Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) (pprn) (% of span) (°% of span) -0.2 0.4 0.60 0.1 0.30 0.30 87.2 87.6 0.40 87.7 0.50 0.10
,Sample Svstem Bias #2 Initial Finai Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) (ppm) (% of span) (% of span) -0.2 0.1 0.30 0.6 0.80 0.50 87.2 87.7 0.50 87.7 0.50 0.00
,Sample Svstem Bias #3 Initial Final Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) (ppm) (% of span) (% of span) -0.2 0.6 0.80 0 0.20 0.60 87.2 87.7 0.50 87.6 0.40 0.10



# i

~ 

# 3

# Appendix "G" (AET CEM Readings)



# g~Run #1 interstate Brick - Kiln #3 Outtet



### Time 1551 Date 10/31 /95

Minutes NOx CO 02 S02

1 23.5 472.5 14.2 0.4 

### 2 23.5 465.7 14.3 0.5 3 23.4 462.6 14.2 0.4 4 23.2 490.7 14.3 0.4 5 24.2 469.6 13.7 0.4 6 24.2 456.7 13.6 0.4 7 24.3 460.5 13.6 0.4 8 23.3 452.9 13.8 0.4 9 22.9 462.7 14.3 0.4 10 22.9 471.6 14.3 0.5 11 22.8 466.9 14.3 0.4 12 22.8 475.8 14.2 0.5 13 22.8 472.5 14.2 0.4 14 22.8 489.7 14.2 0.5 15 24.5 402.4 13.9 0.6 16 19.5 478.7 14.3 0.5 17 23.5 452.7 13.7 0.6 18 24.1 451.8 13.6 0.4 19 24.2 451 13.6 0.4 20 24.2 443 13.6 0.5 21 24.5 447 13.6 0.5 22 23.9 443.9 13.8 0.4 23 23.2 461.7 14.2 0.5 24 23 475.7 14.2 0.4 25 22.8 480.7 14.2 0.4 26 22.7 451.8 14.2 0.5 

### 27 23.6 476.7 13.9 0.4 28 24 454.9 13.6 0.6 29 24.2 437.9 13.6 0.5 30 23.6 453.9 13.6 0.4 0 Average = 23.40 461.14 13.96 0.45

f~Run #2 

### interstate Brick - Kiin #3 Outlet

Time 1718 Date 10/31 /95

Minutes NOx CO 02 S02


### 1 18.8 409.3 12.5 0.4 2 22.8 414.2 12.3 0.4 3 18.7 408.1 12.5 0.3 4 19.4 411.3 13.4 0.4 5 19.6 409.2 16.5 0.4 6 18.6 399.1 14.4 0.4 7 18.3 417.1 15 0.3 8 18.2 413.3 15.2 0.3 9 18.1 417.2 15.3 0.3 10 18.1 426 15.4 0.3 11 18.1 423.2 15.4 0.3 12 21.9 419 15.5 0.4 13 21.6 410.3 15.5 0.3 

### ' 14 20.4 415.2 15.6 0.3

15 17.7 419.4 15.6 0.3 16 18.1 420.1 15.6 0.4 17 16.1 344.3 15.5 0.3 18 21 415.3 16 0.3 19 22 404.3 15.5 0.4 20 23.1 402.1 15.3 0.3 21 22.6 399.4 15.2 0.3 22 21.8 390.3 15.2 0.3 23 17.5 401.1 15.1 0.3 24 20.7 403 15.5 0.3 25 20.5 412.1 15.7 0.3 26 17 414.2 14.6 0.3 27 20.4 419.4 14.7 0.4 28 16.9 411.4 14.7 0.4 29 20.6 418.3 14.7 0.4 

### : 30 17.5 413.4 14.5 0.3

Average 

### = 19.54 409.35 14.93 0.34



# i0Run #3 Interstate Bricic - Kiln #3 Outlet

Time 1828 Date 10/31 /95



# , 

# •. • • •

1 22.9 382.4 13.2 0.4 2 22.9 384.3 13.4 0.4 3 23.4 385.4 13.6 0.4 4 23.1 373.5 13.1 0.4 5 22.2 364.8 14 0.3 6 22.3 386.2 14 0.4 7 20.4 410.4 14 0.4 8 20.2 403.2 16 0.4 9 19.9 396.2 15.6 0.3 10 19.8 406.9 16.6 0.3 11 19.4 435.8 18.3 0.3 12 23.6 436.9 15.3 0.4 13 23.9 428.8 14.1 0.4 14 19.5 423.3 14.4 0.3 15 19.6 418.7 14.8 0.3 16 23.7 429.2 14.4 0.3 17 21.8 422.7 13.7 0.4 18 26.5 466.5 14.7 0.3 19 27.3 459.3 14.6 0.4 20 27.8 449 13.9 0.3 21 29.3 464 14 0.3 22 27.4 432.5 13.6 0.4 23 31.7 444.9 13 0.3 24 27.3 440.1 11.5 0.4 25 27.7 415.3 11.3 0.3 26 28.5 444.3 10.9 0.3 27 29.9 427.7 9.6 0.3 28 27.6 423.6 9 0.3 29 29.7 427.7 9 0.3 30 28 426 10.1 0.3 Average 

# = 24.58 420.32 13.46 0.34

/I .iRun #1 Interstate Brick - Kiln #3 Inlet

Time 1551 Date 10/31 /95

1 75.4 467.4 13.8 129.9 2 76.6 451.2 12.8 138.4 3 78.1 444.1 12.7 138.1 4 77.9 442.2 12.7 138.2 5 78.4 444.9 12.7 138.6 6 79.8 460.7 13.3 132 7 78.9 457 13.3 129.7 8 79.5 462 13.2 129.9 9 80.5 458.9 13.2 128 10 81 464.1 13.5 124.4 11 81.1 465.3 13.6 123.4 .12 81.4 461 13.5 122.6 13 80.9 465.7 13.5 122.7 14 80.3 460.4 12.9 126.4 15 80.7 453 12.8 128.4 16 81.5 448.6 12.8 127.6 17 80.3 451.6 12.8 125.4 18 75.9 456.6 13.5 117.2 19 77.9 465.3 13.4 114.8 20 78.4 464.9 13.4 115 21 77.4 467.2 13.4 115.6 22 78.4 465.5 13.4 114.6 23 79.8 473.2 13.4 115 24 78.4 422.1 13.3 116.9 25 72.1 460.3 13.4 121.4 26 80.6 452.5 12.8 123.6 27 80.9 444.9 12.7 127 28 82.6 448.8 12.7 128 29 77.5 444.3 12.7 128.2 30 79.9 444.9 12.6 128 

# n Average = 79.07 455.62 13.13 125.63Run #2 Interstate Brick - Kiln #3 Inlet 1718 Date 10/31/95

Minutes NOx c0 02 S02

1 79.9 449.9 13.8 146.6 2 80.6 447.2 12.6 146.1 3 80.6 451.2 12.6 145.9 4 79.5 449.9 12.4 146.3 5 79.2 440.4 12 152.1 6 78.8 437.6 12.1 152.3 7 80.5 448.2 12.5 147.1 8 78.1 451.4 14.2 146 9 77.4 450.4 14.1 146.4 10 77.1 450.5 14.1 146.4 11 78.8 452.2 14.1 145.9 12 79.3 451 14.2 145.4 13 78 454.3 14.1 145.7 14 78.5 447.4 14.1 145.4 15 78.3 446.8 14.1 145.3 16 78.3 447.7 14 145.5 17 71.8 400.9 14 146.4 18 76.6 452 14.6 139.3 19 78.9 487.6 13.7 145.3 20 79.5 429.1 13.5 150.6 21 77.9 431.5 13.5 153.2 22 75.7 430.7 13.5 153.2 23 76 434.3 13.5 156.1 24 75.9 443.8 14.1 150.6 25 73 437.4 13.9 148.2 26 75.6 452.7 14.2 149.3 27 75.8 446 14.2 148.8 28 75.7 448.3 14.2 148.7 29 76.4 449.6 14.2 148.4 30 73.8 441.4 13.8 151 Average = 77.52 445.38 13.66 147.92



# 19URun #3 Interstate Brick - Kiln #3 Inlet

Time 1828 Date 10/31 /95

Minu#es NOx CO 02 S02

1 68.3 447.5 13.5 138.8 2 75.4 442.1 13.6 136.1 3 78 435.7 13.5 140.8 4 79.8 431.6 13.2 147.2 5 81.9 425.3 13.2 151.4 6 79.8 430.8 13.3 153.1 7 80.5 441.8 13.8 150.3 8 82.6 447 13.8 148.4 9 82 445.3 13.8 148.2 

### 10 83.1 446.7 13.7 148.9 11 82.4 449.3 13.7 148.9 12 83.3 448.3 13.7 149.3 13 85.4 452.8 14 146.1 14 85 453.3 13.5 147.3 15 84.6 445 13.3 151 16 84.6 441.9 13.3 153.4 17 83.9 439.3 13.3 154.7 18 86.6 447 13.9 151.8 19 85.9 451.3 13.9 148.1 

### 20 85.5 452.7 13.9 147.3 21 85.2 455.4 13.9 147.5 22 85.8 454.4 13.8 148 23 85.4 454.5 13.8 148 

### 24 85.5 454.3 13.9 147.2 25 83.3 459.4 13.9 146.5 26 80.3 407.5 13.6 148 27 76 458 14.2 144.1 28 79.5 448.4 13.5 146.4 29 

### 79.9 438 13.2 154.4 30 82.2 435 13.1 158.8 Average = 82.06 444.65 13.63 148.33

# Appendix "H"

(VEO Readings & Certification Cards)

C4mczZcan 

### C

r 'nvizor_mEntaC Jrutjn9 (fom/zany -qnc.
e/?tno, 

### 9 -1 40eniac, G"4zzzona esa`t -fa-G Cr.ty, r Lta ~ 

### 7o2-786-5553 6o2-253-3354 80i-266-7111

# Appendix "H"

(VEO Readings & Certification Cards)

IW~o~ ancsn ~v~ R, u.can aq.uuu



# an , 

# g n r. SO1-266- 

### 7 111 

## ~ V/sible EmissJon FTsld Documentatlon SOURC AME SEC MIN 0 15 90 45 LOCATIoN 1 0 0 1 2
MA/L/NG AD RESS 2 Ciry 

## ~ ~~ STATE & Z1P
PHONE I 

### ~O~ 2 ~ 

## o - ~ SOU CONT A T



### ~~ ~ ~ 4 O O O a 5 STOP T1ME OBSERVAn N G4TE START TTME 6 PROCESS EO MENT FUEL T

- YPg
CONTROL,EQJJIPMENT OPERATING MODE

OPERATING MODE 7 L14

a 8 9
DESCR/BE EMISSlON POINT 10 11 HEIGHTABOVEGROUND LEVEL

`f O t 1-IEIGH7 RELAT/VE TD OBSERVER F / 12 DlSTANCE FROM OBSERVER 1--5—O / D1REC710N FROM OBSERVER 13 14 DESCRIBE EMISSlONS 64,1 15 EM1SSlON CO

L1j 

## ~ PLUMETYPE.• CONTlNUOU FUGITTVE D INTERM/TTENT Q 18 17 WATER DROPLET5 PRESENT. NO O YESZ1r, IF WATER DROPLET PLUME: ATTACHED O DETACHED 18 Point !n the Plume at Whfch Opacity was Determined



## ~ 19 20 DESCRIBE BACK OUND (Col r, etc.) 21 5KY C N fTIONS. D COLOR

— WIND DIRECTION U C ! ~ W/ND SPEED

/ D 22

~ AMB1ENiCpEMPERATU

~ aE WET 8ULB TEMP. RH, perc nt 24
Stack SOURCE LAM7UTSXE1Cff 

### D~ ortn A~ rvw with V Phm e Sun ' ~- ~ ~ Mnd

x Iubn Pb,nt



# T~ 25 26
27 28 

# ~ ~ • v

Ru/tJon

~ 

## 140 0 

# , \

~ Sun Locatlon Une OBSERVE,;S J"E (,nq


## ~ ~ i22x .! 

### DATE AVERAGE OPACITY FOR HIGHEST PERIOD COMMENTS (Describe Observatlon Pbint)

~if~

_ ' /PLK/ 1~ ~

~ I CERTlFlED ~ ., •. ~-~
J~ ^ (7 G \
~ '[2RL ~ /Z ~ t7'[J ~ C, l.L L:1R 

### Sq66o
r 

### So1-266-7111 VTsrb/e E-rrlss/on F'•s/d aocJmentatlorr SCURCF NAME SFC

~ . I M1N 0 15 30 I 4'S LOCAT7CN f ~ , 

# I ~ 

# C

MAIL:NG AOCRESS CITY

! STATE & ZIP

„ ~ ~ PH NE

~ NTACT 

### ° I-SCUR



### ~ 

# d

~ D / Z 

## ~ n- 

## ~ C. 

## ~ • OBSEr

- f VAT70p,CATc START TIlNE Si CP TIME 5I 0 I

~ 6 PRCC y ~ 

# ~ Et - 

# ~ fPM NT FUEL TY E OPErZ4T7NG MODE 7+ I ~ (
~ G L • ~ / 1" ` ~ 

### ~ CCNTRC ECUrP ENT OPERATING MODE 8 / ~ U

~ ~(~ rr C~ (/ ~ r 9 G DE.SCRIB =HdIS iONPOfNT
~ ,/•M•//f
r 'O I NEiGNT ABOVE GRCUNO LEYE! NEIGHT RELATlVE,.Tp OBSERVEA (f



### (A / 12 I

~ 

## --76 _ 3 I I DISTANCF FROM 08SFR}/ER D

1 13 

### I I I
DESCRIBE EM CNS 

### E.'NlSSiON CO

/ LOR
1~ PLL/ME 

### 7YPE CONTINUCUS.EE 

# ~ - 

# 1 FUGl71VEC71N7E,-7MfT7E

. , vj [• 

### 16 17 

### I I I I WATER DROPLEi S P.4ESE'VT. NO C! YES,Lr

,- - 

# I !F Wi47E,R OROPL r PLUME

ATaACN DETACNE:? C 18 N;irrt Irr the Plume at WMch Opacity w Determined



### /

~ 

# rol l. I I CESCa1BE KGRCUND (C,

~ ror tc.) 21 SKYCCNDITT 5,ySANpCCWR
r - WlND DlREf' •T/0N 

# ~ WD 

# ~ E=:7 

## ~ I I I I
RN. perzent 81EN7 T PERATURE

S ~ WET 8UL9 T E.'bIP. 4~~ ) ro /r 24 sraex 

### ~ SOURCS LAtC!!T SKE'CJ•J Oraw Nonn Arrow with Sun e ' 

### ~ "

----- ~ r " ~ ~ r MnQ 0 

### ssfort Polnt 2-4 ( ~ '



# I I

27 I I I 

## 28 ~ 

## I 29 I I



### I I 

# 30 I I AVEr?AGE OPACITY FOR
CCMME.'VTS (G'esc: ibe OOserratlon Fbintl

O~ trtd 7t Surt Locatlon Urne

C6SE7 GNATURE I DA E L7 

### ~~
CRG IZ-.%T7CN /~ , ~ --- CERT; F c'C 

### 3Y ~ / CA_

`

~ ,;. /-,,..: o••

~ -- . l ,c

~ ,-E ~-t -

~ , -L - f ~ . I 

## ~~~ ~ y'` ( <""/'/ 

## ~ ~ ~ ~~/~ 7 ' ~~ I, 

# ~

### CARL KOONI — Z ASSOCIA-SS STa-= OF UTAH DIVIS;CN CF AIR GUALITY ot Nasinville. 7er.r.essee Trus c:r::ties :nat 

### JOF:'— ~ s ~ T, uj,' 

### , cT

success:ully par c:pated in Visible Emissions training on 

## ~~ 

## 4-{ s — 1 9 9s and is Gualitied to e
~ aivate Visible Emissions tor a period of six (6) mcnths trom the date ot certiticat4on.

Instructor I 

## ~ This is to ac:<nowledse that 

## V. LQEr<l ~ 

## r c nlSO ~C~ has succ=sstuli,v ccimpieseci :7e VPsil:le =:nissions cvai;:a::c C:.urse cancuc:ed !:v te Oivisicn oi Air Cuality ar.d has .-et : ~ minin'.L'm reclAren7ent. r1eCe55aPil :0 evaluate vi5.`' •ie emis3::..'• acccrctng CO C?A

~ et32C?C lj

. i•



## ~ r Oirec:cr. Givisicn ot Air Cualiry Valid until 

## C-CT 1 1 1595 S"ATE CF UTAH DIVIS;CN aF AIR CUALIT`! This c2miies ;hat 

### JD SC s=--
has sucC22s:uily cc mcietea !he `i's;c,e _-ussio ns E•raluaticn Caurse cancuc:ea tv :ne Divis:cn ct Air Cuaut v anc nas r,tet :ne minimum reouirements necsssari :a evaivate visibie emissions. ac _rcing :o E?.a

pirec 'r. Oivisian at air Cuauty

rs9+r cqq Validunni uL ~ 1 ~ ~ 7 '" STATE CF UTAH DIVIS;CN CF AIR CUALITY This =ar::'ies :rat 

### QICa 

### H.a[v 'K=:`dS

has sL;c:2ss:J1lv =mcleSeC :tte '/istbie =

~ r:issccns ' E :aiu'a'; - Ccurse .cncuc:ec !:v :ne Oivis;cn et Air Cuaiiri ana -as -e: .` r-fn:r:u.- recuirements nec2esarj to evatuate vis:cie amiss:cr. acccrcing :a c?A .M

/ e tr.cG / ?.: ! ,; ~ , Girec:or. Division ot Air Cuariry valic unnl 

## I(;

~ 

## 7 1 1 4

1995

STATE CF UTAH S TATE OF UTAH DIVISaON OF AIFi QUALITY DIVISICN CF AIR CUALITY T his cerufies :

~ at 

### ToD 

### D BEiSON This cani6es ,hat 

### R`!A.`l 3EVcOy has succssstullv czmpleted the VisiGle E:nissions Evaluatian Course conduc ec cy :ne Oivision or Air Cuaiity anc thas met tne mirtimum recuirementa nec=ssary tc evatuate •rismfe emissions. acccrctng to E?A ,

~ rtl:" .e

- ~



# ~--~~~ 

# u.., ~ Cirec:or. Givisicn at A;r Cuaiity 

### '' Vai t c untd ~ f



### " 1 1 199 

## 5 has succassrully cemcieted :::a Visii:le Ernissions Czurse ccnduc:ed --y the Civtsicn ct ;;ir Cuaiiri anc ias •-e: minimum recuirements necessarv ta evatuate vis:cie :rn;ss:c acccrei-a :0 E?A

.,•. 

## ~.~-~~'~ ~~ 1 C Cirec:cr. =ivis:cn ct Air Cuaury Vaiic untii 

### 0rT I 1 19 51

# Appendix "I"

(Calibration Data)



# m

# Appendix „1,.



# (Calibration 

# Data)

c4mEti.can 

### EnvZzonmentaf 9FS.tin9 Com 

### ~ any gnc.
e `eno, 'cN'cvada.
- I Pfioanix, OTZi.zona csaCt -fake eity, '
- Uta4


### 7o2-786- 6o2-2 2 53-3354 8oi-266-7111American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111

POSTTEST DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM

(English Units)

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number Plant 11 /2-95 25.18 CR (097) Interstate Brick West Valley, Utah Calibrated Bv Pretest Yi Avera4e Yi Low Span High Span JPB 1.07 1.093 1.017 1.124

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter QH/13.6 Wet TEst Meter Setting AH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp.

2.00 10.94 10 70 0.14706 70 70 2.00 10.97 10.01 71 0.14706 71 71 2.00 11.01 10 71 0.14706 71 71

Inlet (Td i) °F

70 71 71 71 72 72 Dry Gas Meter

Outlet (Td o) °F
70 72 72 72 73 74 Average

(Td) °F

70.75

71.50

72.75 Time 0

Minutes

11.9

11.95

11.95 Yi

1.089

1.091

1.098 Average Yi

1.093

Post Test Temperature Check

Reference: ERTCO Hg Thermometer Meter Box: CR #1(097) Sample Box: CR#1 A

Meter Box Reference Sample Box Reference Meter In: 71 71 Impinger In: 240 241 Meter Out: 70 71 Impinger Out: 45 46 Oven: 244 244



### ~ I~American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111

POSTTEST DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM

(English Units)

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number Plant 11/2-95 25.18 UT #790-484 Interstate Brick West Valley, Utah Calibrated By Pretest Yi Averacqe Yi Low Span High Span JPB 0.985 0.991 0.936 1.034

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter AH/13.6 Wet Test Meter Setting OH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp.

2.00 9.91 9.98 69 0.14706 69 69 2.00 9.94 10 69 0.14706 69:5 70 2.00 10.01 10.05 70 0.14706 70 70

Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 (Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi

69 69 69.25 10.04 0.988 69 70 70 71 70.75 10.05 0.991 70 72 71 73 72.00 10.04 0.994 71 73 Average Yi


### 0.991

Post Test Temperature Check ,

Reference: ERTC.O Hg Thermometer

Meter Box: UT 790-484 Sample Box: UT #1 A

Meter Box Reference Sample Box Reference Meter In: 69 69 Impinger In: 235 235 Meter Out: 69 70 Impinger Out: 70 70 Oven: 235 236



# ~~ 

# \

# Amaerican EnvironmQntal Testing Company, Inc_ WZ Sa uth Birch D rfive Spanish Foric, Utah 84500 (801) 256-7111 

## Cnmpany: _ 015L, /



## ~~ /^ 

## ~ 

## Date: /C'

Soures: ' e- 2 ~ ~~ LZI" 

## Calibrated By: h l

NOZZLB CALIBRATION


## Nozzie Di D2 Ds AD D average Icentfflcatton (1n. ) (in. ) (in. ) (In. ) Number '

~ r


# S~ ~~'/~ ~/ ~- ~~ 

## J. v v 0


# 31,-Z ~ 

# a

~ 

# 6, 31,

~ 

# - c

~ 

# - voa

where: 

## D1,2,3 = Nozzie diameter mea3ured on a difterent diameter, (in.). Tolerance = mea3ure withln 0.001 lnches (0.25 mm). LD =

~ 

## x9m um difiarence In any two measurement3, (in. ). Tolerance =0.004 Incfie3 (0.1 mm). 

## D averace - Average of DY, D2, Ds.

a~~

# 2 4

~ 

# j

~

~

, 

# Amefican Environmental Testing Company, Inc_ 585 South Birch Drive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 256-7111


## Company: Date: -



# • = ~ 

# .. ,_ . . Calibrated By:

NOZZLE CALIBRATION


## Nozzle Di D2 Ds aD D average Identiflcat(on (in. ) (in. ) (In. ) (in. ) Number `

~ 

# 3

3 ~

0

. 36''P O. Oca o o,



## Where : D1,2,3 = Nozzle diameter measured on a different diameter, (in.). Tolerance = measure within 0.001 inches (0.25 mm). 

## AD = Maxim um difTerence In any two measurements, (in. ). Tolerance =0.004 Inches (0.1 mm). D ave rage = A rerage of Dt, D2, Ds.



# a~ 

# 3American Environmental Tesiing Company, Inc. 

### 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utan 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801 ) 266-7 1 1 1


### Meter Box Calibration Data Form (Enclish Units)

Date Barometric oressur=

~ i e._ 

### ro r = • .cx Jurr.cer 9/2,'95 25.62 UT 790-484

Ave-aae Yi Average ^_H Cafibrated 5v Std. Me*_er Yi 0.985 1.719 BA,I. - GE1 0.99497

- 

### •Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter C.H/ i 3.6 Wet Test Meter Setting CH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) F0 (Tw) 'F Average Temp.

0.50 4.84 5 72 0.03676 71 72 1.00 4.88 5 73 0.072 53 72 f 73 1.50 9.62 10 73 0.1 1029 70

s 77 2.00 9.7 Z 10 71 0.1 4 , - 06 73 73 3.00 9.79 10 73 0.22-059 73 73 4.00 9.78 10 74 Z 74 

### 74 Dry Gas yteter 

### Inlet Outlet Ave.-ace Time 0 (Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) 'F Minutes Yi AH


### 70 77 74.25 11.23 0.96'76 1.7573 71 79 71 83 78.25 8.15 0.91 7 97 1.8147 72 87 73 92 84.25 12.54 0.9787 1.6277 74 98 75 100 88.00 11.08 0.9887 1.6670 75 102 76 104 91.25 9.05 0.9988 1.6347 78 107 

### 79 108 94.25 8.25 0.9485 1.81 ZO 81 109 

### Averace Yi Average AH 0.985 1.719 

# aDqArne-;can Environmental Testing Ccr^cany, Inc. 565 Scuth Birc:i Drive Soanisn Foric. Utan 31660

(801) 798-8553 (301) 266-71 11


### Pitot Tube Caiibration Form

ptot T ube Identincation Vur^oer s' - 8 

### Date. 0i4 c



### Calibrated 84 VS8-768


### "A" 51de Caiibration

Run Number P std P s Co Deviation

cm H20 cm H20 (S)

. (inches H20) (incfies H20) 1 0.36 0.475 0.37C6 -0.00062 2 0.355 0.46 0.8785 0.00730 3 0.355 0.175 0.86=+5 -0.00668 Average: 0.8712

: "6" Side Ca(ibration

Run Number P std P s CP Deviation



### c.-n H20 cm H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0•305 0.435 0.8675 0.00596 2 0.36 0.19 0.8571 -0.004-It1 3 0.355 0.1,? 0.8600 -0.00156 Avecage: 0.8615

A & 8 Average = 0.3664



### ~ R~ ~

### American Environmental Testing C::T:pany, Inc. Sc5 Scuth Birch Drive Spanish Fcric, Utah 84600

(801) 793-8553 (801) 2c6-71 1 1


### Meter Box Calibration Data Fcrrn (Enciish Units)
Oate Barcmetric P-essure Ntecz.► 

### gcx yur-ler 9/22/95 25.54 RAC 45-509 Average Yi Average CH Calibrted Bv Std, Meter Yi 0.985 1.812 VBB

- 

### RSS 0.99497



### Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter CHi 13.6 

### Wet Test Meter Setting CH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp.

0.50 4.85 5 70 0.03676 63 71 1.00 4.81 5 70 0.07353 63 

# _1 71 1.50 9.711 10 70 0.11029 63 71 2.00 9.633 10 69 0.117 06 6c 70 3.00 9.453 10 69 0.2-2059 67 70 4.00 9.469 10 70 0.29412 63 71 Dry 

### Gas Meter (nlet Cutlet Average Time 0 (Td i)
- 

### F (Td o) 'F (Td) °F lviinutes Yi CH

71 75 73.50 11.14 0.9733 1.7109 72 76 72 78 76.00 8.09 0.9639 1.8262 74 80 76 85 82.25 12.89 0.98^ 00 1.6865 79 89 83 96 91.00 11.55 0.9996 1.7870 85 100 87 107 98.00 9.57 0.9879 1.8975 89 109 91 113 102.50 8.46 0.9923 1.9642 92 114 

### Average Yi Average CH 0.985 1.812



# aD b

### Americ:3n Environmen[al Testing Ccr':pany, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utah 81600

(801) 798-8553 (801) 260-71 1 1

Meter Box Calibrrtion Oata Fcr.m

(Engiish Units)
Dace Barcme*.ric Pressure NteTer gox ^1u;r,i:=r 9i 2Z/95 25.54 RAC R2321
Ave.raQe Y Average IH tafibrted Ev Std. .Me*_er Yi 0.910 1.630 VBB - R8B 0.99497



### Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter aH/13.6 Wet Test Meter Setting &H (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) 'F Ave age Temp.

0.50 4.57 5 69 0.03676 69 

### 69

,. 1.00 4.58 5 70 0.07353 69.5 

### -' 69 1.50 8.91 10 70 0.11029 70 

### 70 ; 2.00 8.901 ' 10 71 0.1 s706 70.5 

### 70 3.00 8.34 10 69 0Z205? 69.5 

### 70 4.00 8.329 10 71 0.29-412 70.5 

### 70 Dry Gas Meter tniet Cudet Ave age Time 0 

### (Td i) 'F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi CH

71 70 70.50 9.88 0.9107 1.5301 

### 70 71 71 77 74.50 7.19 • 0.9171 1.6045 

### 72 78 74 87 82.25 11.83 0.9031 1.7002 

### 76 92 78 96 88.00 10.09 0.1 0 096 1.6382 80 98 82 101 92.25 8.324 0.9095 1.6762 84 102 86 104 95.25 7.104 0.9090 1.6292 88 103 

### Average Yi Average CH 0.910 1.630



### .~



# ..!

~ 

# iAmerican Environmentai Testing Ccmpany, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Soanisb Forlc, Utan 84660

(201) 793-8553 (201) 256-7 1 1 1

Meter Box Cafibraticn Data Fcrni

(Enciisb Units)

Cate Barome*.r ic P'?ssure iVlptpr bCK "JLr"CF.' 

### 9!2/95 25.61 CR r"r(097) Averaqe Yi Average CH Calibrated Bv Std. Meter Yi 1.070 1.883 VBS - .1P3 0.99497

Orfice Manometes Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Tesz Meter CH/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

### Setting CH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Averace Tesnp.

0.50 5.42 5 70 0.03676 70 

### 70 1.00 5.517 5 71 0.07353 71 _r 71 1.50 10.64 10 72 0.11029 72 

### 72 2.00 10.71 10 73 0.1-' ~ 

### 06 73 

### 73 3.00 10.84 10 73 0.22059 73 

### 73 4.00 10.83 10 74 0.29=' 12 74 

### 74 Dry Gas Meter Iniet Cuttet Average Time 0 

### (Td i) °F (Td o) 'F (Td) °F Nlinutes Yi CH

70 69 69.75 12

. 

### 75 1.0765 1.8160 

### 70 70 71 70 70.75 9.18 1.0942 1.8207 

### 71 71 71 72 71.75 14.71 1.0536 1.8889 

### 72 72 71 72 72.00 12.96 1.0575 1.9358 

### 72 73 72 73 72.50 10.9 1.0683 2.0031 

### 72 73 73 74 73.50 9.05 1.0692 1.8310 

### 73 74 Average Yi Average aH 1.070 1.883



# aa ~ 

# /American Environmentai Testing Corr.rany, Inc. 565 Scuth 6irch Drive Soanisii Fcr;c. l:tah 84660

(801) 798-3553 (801) 266-71 1 1

Pitot Tube Caiibraticn Fcrm

pitct TubP fdentincsticn Numrer 6'

Cafibrated 8v: VBB - tbb


### "A" Side Caiibration Run yumber P std p s Cr Deviation



### cm H20 cm H20 (5) (inc.'ies H20) (in&es H20) 1 0.31 0.47 0.8121 -0.00290 2 0.32 0.48 0.8165 0.00145 3 0.32 0.48 0.8165 0.00145 Average: 0.8150



### "6" Sice Caiibrrticn
Run Number P std P s CP Deviation
: c.-n H20 c.:. H20 (S) (inc.hes H20) (inc:

~ es H20) 1 0.32 0.18 0.3165 0.005.=8 2 0.3Z 0.49 O.8C31 -0.00279 3 0.32 0.=9 0.3081 -0.002-79 Average: 0.8109

A & 8 Average = 0.8130



# PtiAmerican Environmental Testing Cor^Oany, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Forlc. Utan 84660

(801 ) 798-3553 (301) 256-71 1 1
Pitct Tube C.;iibration Form



### , Pitot T uce Identificaticn Vumber: 6' - 6

Calibrated BY' V66 - rbb
"A" Side Calibration



### Run Number P std p s cm H20 c.-n H20 (inches HZO) (inr-

~ es H20) 1 0.31 0.43 Z 0.31 0.4; 3 0.31 0.43

Averaae:

"5" Side Caiibraticn


### Run Number P std P s crn H2O cm H20 (indhes H20) (inches H20) 1 0.32 0.4S 2 0.31 0. ~~ 3 0.31 O.=Z Average: C at°

. 0,7i0

---

Cp De

~ riat;on 

### (5)
0.8=° 1 0.00000 0.3491 0.00000 0.8491 0.00000

0.3491

Cp De , ,iaticn 

### (S)
0.°433 -0.00722 0.8=91 -0.00142 0.859, 0.00363

0.3505

A & B Average = 0.8498



### C~ 

# ,/DAmerican Environment.;f Testing Comcany. Inc. 505 South Birch Drive Spanish For;c, l;tah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-1 7 1 , 1 1

Pitot Tube Calibration Form

Ptct T ube ICentincation Number 6' - T Date• 9/23i95
Caiibrated By- RBB - JP3

"A" Side Calibration

Run Number P std P s CY Deviaticn

cm 

### H20 c:n H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.29 0.42 0.8309 -0.00288 2 0.3 0.4 3 0.8353 0.00144 3 0.3 0.43 0.8353 0.00144

. --- Average: 0.3338

"B" 

### Sice Calibraticn

Run Number P stc} P s Cz Deviaticn c.-n H20 c.m H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches HZO) 1 0.295 0.43 0.°283 -0.00306 2 0:3 0.435 0.°305 -0.00088 3 0.3 0.43 O.S353 0.00393 Average: 0.8313

A & B Average = 0.8326



# 9,0

### American Environment.;i Testing Ccmcany, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork. Utah 84660

(301) 798-3553 (801) 266-71 11

Pitot Tube Caiibration Form



### Pitot Tube Identincatfon Numbe.•- 6' - 0 Date: 9/30/ 0 C _

Caiibrated 6v- V68 - JDS


### "A" Side Caiibration

Run Number P std p s C:. Deviaticn

cm H20 cn H20 (5) (inr-

~ es H20) (inches H20) 1 0.28 0.37 0.8699 0.00072 2 0.28 0.375 0.8641 -0.005 T 0 3 0.29 0.38 0.8736 0.00439

= Average: 0.8692



### "B" Side Calibraticn
Run Number P std P s CP Deviaticn

cm H20 c.;i HZO (S) (inc.hes H20) (inc.hes H20) 1 0.2° 0.375 0.°6- 1 1 0.00250 2 0.23 0.38 0.9584 -0.00311 3 0.275 0.3

- 7 0.3621 0.00053 Average: 0.8615

A & 8 Average = 0.8654



# a1vAme.-ican Environmenta( Testing ComPany, Inc. 565 South Birc:; Drive Spanis5 Fcrk, Utan 84660

(301) 798-3553 (301 ) 266-71 1 1
Pitot Tube Caiibration Fcrr;t

Pitct Tube Identincaticn Numeer- s' - T Date:°!;r;/oc

CaiiTrrated Bv: JPa - JPH


### "A" Side Cafibraticn

Run Number P std p s CP Deviation ; Crn H20 cm HZO (S) 

### (inches H20) (inc.hes H20) 1 0.37 0.49 0.8690 0.00053 2 0.38 0.5 0.8718 0.00334 3 0.37 0.495 0.8646 -0.00387
' Average: 0.8634



### • 'B" Side Caiibraticn
Run Numbe.► 

### P std P s CP Deviaticn

. c:n H20 cm H20 (5) (in&es H20) (inGhes HZ4) 1 0.365 0.=8 0.8720 0.00055 2 0.37 0.49 0.8690 -0.00251 3 0.37 0.

~ 35 0.8731 0.001 96 Average: 0.8715

A & 6 Average = 0.8700



# 1>0

### American Environment.:l Testing Ccr^panY, Inc. 565 South Birc-h Drive Spanisti For' •<, Utan 84660

(801) 798-35.53 (801) 256-71 1 1

Pitot Tube Caiibraticn Forr.

- I



### Pitcr Tube Ide.n.tin`caticn Numbe- S' - a ('a[

~ ' ai2 , •~ oc


### Caiibrated Bw R$8 - tbb


### "A" Side GGbraticn

Run Number P std p s C? Deviaticn

crn HZO cm HZO (S) (inc.ties H20) (inches H20) 1 0.3 0.4 0.8660 -0.00117 2 0.3 0.4 0.8660 -0.00117 3 0.31 0.41 0.8695 0.00234

._ Average: 0.8672

"6" Side Caiibraticn
Run Number p std p s CP Deviaticn

c.-n H20 c.-n H20 (Si (inches H20) (inc5es H20) 1 0.31 0.=1 0.26-a 5 -0.00243 2 0.3 0.4 0.2660 -0.00594 3 0.31 0.4 0.3803 0.0083 7 Average: 0.8720



### A & B Average = 0.8696



# ,~ 

# _rq

### American Environmental Testing Ccmpany, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Soanish For'<, Utan 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 256-71 1 1


### Pitot Tube Caiibraticn Form

P+tot TubP Identin'catfon Number: 8' - B Qate:9" 0 i 11 - 5
Caiibrated By: RS RH
»A" Side Caiibration



### Run Nurnber P std P s C:, Deviaticn

r.n H20 cm H20 (5) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.29 0.4 0.8515 0.00068 2 0.285 0.395 0.8494 -0.00136 3 0.29 0.4 0.8515 0.00063

.r Average: 0.8508



### "o" Side Caiibraticn
Run Number P std P s CP Deviaticn

cm H20 c.-n H20 (S) (inches H20) (inc:hes H20) 1 029 0.8623 0.00612 2 0.235 0.395 0.3494 -0.0067< 3 0.29 0.395 0.3503 0.00065 Average: 0.8562

A & B Average = 0.8535



# / til' ~

### American Environmental Testing Ccmpany, Inc. 505 Scuth Birch Drive Spanish Fork, t.Itan 84660



### (301) 798-3553 (301) 256-7 1. 11


### Pitot Tube Caiibration Farm

F;t^t Tube identincaticn VumEer• 8' - C

Caiibrated Bv: RB 

### RH Da

~~ 

### • 4 / 20 

### io: 

### _ z

"A" Side Caiibration


### Run Number P stC P s Co Deviation

cm H2O crn H20 (5) (incties H20) (inches H20) 1 0.25 0.36 0.8498 0.00156 2 0.25 0.35 0.8452 -0.00312 3 0.26 0.36 0.811 1 ?98 0.00156

_ Average: 0.8433

"B" Side Caiioration


### Run Number P std P s Cr Ce•liation c:Tt H2O CT HZ' 0 (

~ ) 

### (inches H20) (inches H2O) 1 0.255 0.353 0.8 4 7 5 -0.00228 2 0.25 0.36 o.8

~ 

### 9a 0.00002 3 0.263 0.36: 0.35

~ 

### 1 0.00226 Average: 0.8498

A & B Average = 0.8490



# gIbAmerican Environmental Testing C:rnP;r.y, Inc. 565 Scut.ti Birc:i Drive Spanisti F.ric, Utah 84600

(801) 798-8553 (801) 250-71 1 1

Pitot Tube Caiibratfcn Fcm

Pitot Tube Identificstion Vurrber. 11' -A Dat3:9i29i 1

- 1 5 -

Calibrated Sv: 188 , /68

"A" Side Calibraticn

Run Number P std P s CIP. Deviaticn crn H20 c.-n H20 (S) (inches H24) (inches H20) 1 

### 0.36 0.51 0.8402 0.00194 2 0.36 0.51 S 0.3361 -0.00215 3 0.355 0.505 0.8384 0.00021

' — Average: 

### 0.8332


# "c" Side Calicracicn

Run Number P std P s Co Deviaticn c.-n H20 c.-n 

### H20

. (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 

### 0.365 0.52 0.3373 -0.00163 Z 0-

3 37 O.SZ5 0.83 0 -5. 0.00001 

### 3 0.375 0.53 0.3- 1 12 0.00167
Average: 

### 0.3395

A & B Average = 0.8389



# 10

### American Envircnment.;l Testing Comeany, Inc. 563 Scuth Birc.h Drive Spanisn Fcr'.t, Utah 81660

(201) 798-3553 (801) 256-71 1 1
Pitot T ube Calibraticn Fcrm

Pitot Tube Identific3ticn Number! 1 1' 

### - 6 p;, 2' /QC


### Calibrated By: T3B - JP3


### "A" Side Caiibraticn

Run Number P std P s CP De-riaticn

crn H20 c.-n H20 (S) (inches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.31 0.45 0.8300 0.00142 2 0.31 0.45 0.8300 0.00142 3 0.3 0.41 0.8257 -0.00285



# _ Average: 0.8286

"8" Side CaPibraticn
Run Number P std P s Cp Deviaticn

cm H20 c.-n H20 (S) (inc.ties H20) (inches H20) 1 0.3 0.=:='. 0.2Z57 0.00165 2 0.3 0.15 0.3165 -0.00757 3 0.31 0.45 0.8300 0.005o2 Average: 0.8241

A & B Average = 0.8263



# aa'

### American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1

Meter Box Calibration Data Form 

### (English Units)

Date Barometric Pressure Me*.er Box Nur^ber 9/2/95 25.61 CR #(097)
Average Yi Averag,e AH Calibrated By Std. Meter Yi 1.070 1.883 VBB - JPB 0.99497

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter LH/13.6 Wet Test Meter Setting AH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp.

0.50 5.42 5 70 0.03676 70 70 1.00 5.517 5 71 0.07353 71 ' 71 z 1.50 10.64 10 72 0.11029 72 

### 72 2.00 10.71 10 73 0.14706 73 

### 73 3.00 10.84 10 73 0.22059 73 

### 73 4.00 10.88 10 74 0.29412 74 

### 74 Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 (Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi &H

70 69 69.75 12.75 1.0765 1.8160 

### 70 70 71 70 70.75 9.18 1.0942 1.8207 

### 71 71 71 72 71.75 14.71 1..0536 1.8889 

### 72 72 71 72 72.00 12.96 1.0575 1.9358 

### 72 73 72 73 72.50 10.9 1.0683 2.0031 

### 72 73 73 74 73.50 9.05 1.0692 1.8310 

### 73 74 Average Yi Average AH 1.070 1.883



# ~ 

# -1qAme^icart Environmencal Testina Ccrrpany, Inc. 565 Scuth Birch Drive Spanish Fcric, Utah 8-1660

(301) 798-3553 (80 i) 2

~ 0-71 1 1

Pitot Tube Calibration Forrn



### pitot Tube Ic'e.^.tincaticn Number• a
Calibrated Bv' V88 - rbb


### "A" Side Caiibration

Run Number p stc p s

cm HZO c.mz H20 (inches H20) (inc.hes H20) 

### 1 0.3 0.47 2 0.3 0.47 3 0.3 0.46

' Average:



### "6" Side Caiibraticn
Run Number p std p s cm H20 cm H20 (inc.hes H20) (inches H20) 1 0.31 0.47 2 0.17 3 0.31 0.47 

### Average: Dnte: o:Z ,n5

Cp Ceviation 

### (S)

0.7989 -0.00288 0.7989 -0.00288 0.8076 0.00576
0.8018

CP Ceviaticn 

### (5)

0.3121 0.004=0 0.7989 -0.00830 0.3121 0.00" 1 --0
0.8077

A & 5 Average = 0.8048Ame.-iccn Environment.at Testing Ccr'--any, Inc. 565 Sccth Birch Drive Spanisb Fori<, l.'tan 846v0

(301) 798-3553 (801) 256-71 11


### Pitot Tube Caiiirration Form

Pitct Tube 'dentincaticn Vumber: =' - C Date: a/?Oi 95

Caiibrrated Bvc. VB RBB


### "A" Side Calibratfon

Run Number P stc p s Cc Deviaticn

cm H20 c.m H20 (S} (inches H20) (Inc:nes H20) 1 0.36 0.495 0.8523 -0.00053 2 0.365 0.5 0.8544 0.00107 3 0.36 0.495 0.8528 -0.00053

~ Average: 0.8533



### "o" Side Calibraticn

Run Number P std P s Cp Ceviaticn

crn H20 c.-n H20 (S) (inc7es H20) (incties H20) 1 0.36 0.5 0.3435 -0.00087 2 0.355 0.=95 0.3- 1 69 -0.0025- 1 3 0.36 0.195 0.8523 0.00341 Average: 0.8494

A & B Average = 0.8514



## ~ 

# .. ~ 

# -1American Environment:,i Te=ting ComFany, Inc. 563 Scuth Birch Drive Spanis

~ : Fork. Dtun 84660

(801) 79fi

- 35:,3 (301 ) 256

- 7 1 1 1 

### Stac:< Temperature Sensor Caiibrat:cn Fcrm

ibe-mcccuple uurmber: =1 Cicitai -= 2 Cmec3 C':te• 3- . c= Barcr-e*^c Pressure: 25.7" :afibrated Sv- JDS - RPU Re; .erence: ERTCO -M

.g - Ciass



### Reference Pcint Source a Reference Tnermcc--upie Temperature Number (spe:'' ry) Therrncmeter Pctertticmeter Difference b

Temperature °F Te.•rperature °F % a) Ice Water 34 35 -0.33 rr1 b) Hot H2'J 140 141 -0.24 Digital c) Boiiing H20 215 211 0.20



### d) Warm Oil 254 253 -0.19

, e) Hot Oil 398 3 0 6 0.30 f) .Bciiing Gil 398 401 -0.45
a) Ice Wat_°r 35 36 -0.32

~ 2 b) Hct H20 1=6 1=3 -0.13 Ome7a c) Bciiing H20 204 202 0.=1 1 2 d) Warm Oii 233 235 -O.sO e) Hct Cii 379 373 0.46 f) Bciiing Gii 3 7 2 3 , 70 0.31

i Type of caiibratien system used.

~ 

### (reference temp. 'C + 273) -(test thermcmeter ternp. °C + 2 7 3) * 100< 1.5?% reference temperature °C + 273

m

### Americ3n Environmental Testing Comcany, Inc. 505 South Birch Orive Spanish Fork, l;tah 84660

(I O JO1 ) 798-3553 (301) 266-71 1 1 

### Sample Bcx Temperature Sensor Caiibraticn Fcrm

SamCIP, Box Uurnbe!: CRT'r1 (JT T'.4 - Q.AC C !i%a [tiat°• 3^., C C Barcrne*-jc Pressure: 2 c c ~ 

### Calibrated 8v: VBB - JPB Re*ere.^.ce: ERTCO - 105 - SyBS



### Reference Point Source a Reference Therr;zccauple Temperature Number (spe::fij) T'ne.rmome+:er Potenticmeser DifiPerence b Temperature °F Temperature 'F °ro 3 Oven On 250 251 -0.19 CR 4 Oven On 244 247 -0.58 #1A 2 Oven Cn 2

~ 6 234 0.39

1 Cold H20 54 55 -0.31 

### 8 Oven Cn 57 56 0.30 7 Oven On 59 53 0.30
3 Oven On 247 2=:6 0.19 UTa 4 Oven Cn 2 4 3 2=1 -0.19 

### #1 A 2. Cven On 239 2-0 -0.20

1 Ccld H20 46 47 -0.31 8 Oven Cn 5; 57 -0.61 7 Cven On 61 60 0.30
3 Oven Cn 213 0.19 RAC 4 Oven On 254 253 -0.19 #1A 2 Oven Cn 236 237 -0.20

1 Cold H20 56 57 -0.30 8 Oven On 60 61 -0.30 7 Oven On 63 62 030

3 Oven On 241 24"' -0.58 RAC 4 Oven On 24-'. 211 0.53 #2A 2 Oven On 20 240 -75.09

1 Ccld H20 S4 5 5 -0.31 8 Oven Cn 53 53 -0.61 

### 7 Oven On 61 60 0.30

a Type of calibration system used. 

### b(reference temp. °C + 273) -(test thermometer te.rnp. °C + 273) * 100< 1.59'0 reference temperature 'C + 273

Ol 2-27Americ:,n Envircnmental Testing Corncany, Inc. SoS Scut,ti Birch Crive Spanish For'<, l:tah 84660



### (801) 798-8553 (801) 250-71 1 1


### Baiance Calibration Cata Form

Baiance Vame: Ohaus GA - 200 S2 (anaivticai) 

### Nurnrrer : 1 707
Balance Name: Me**!er - 88 - 3000 r700 Lcaderl 

### Numoer : K6888


### Ciassincation of Standard Weiahts: Tvoe "S" W.B.S. Anafvst: JOS
A 200 5 Ohaus GA - 200 S2
Oate 0.500 a 1.0000 a 10.0000 a 50.0000 a 100.0000 a 

### 3/2/94 0.500 1.0001 10.0001 50.0002 100.0002 9/6/94 0.500 1.0000 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 3/3/95 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0000 100.0000

. 9/22/95

1 

### 0.50001 0.9999 10.0001 49,9998

U 3600 blettie► 

### - 68 - 3C00

date 0.500 a 1.0000 a 10.0000 a 50.0000 g 100.0000 a 

### 3/2/94 0.5 1.0 10.0 50.1 100.1 9/6/94 0.5010 1.OG01 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000 3/3/95 0.5000 1.0001 10.0000 50.0000 100.0001



## ~ 

# aq

### American Environmentai Testin, Cor.-cany, Inc. 565 Scuth Birc-i Drive Soanisn For<, Utan 840'60

(801) 798-3553 (301) 266-7 i 11
Baiance Calibration Data Form

Bsiance Name• Satcrus - 4 700 S lum:•e• • 35;1ZC-r5-

- - _- 

### Balance Name: Satorius - U3600 (Too Loacer) Numoer : 351 20087 _-- c'rassificaticn of Standard Weiqhts: Tvpe 

### "S" W.B.S. ,nnaivst: JPB - RH
A 200 S


### Date 0.500 a 1.0000 a 10.0000 a 50.0000 a 100.0000 

### a 

### 3/2/94 0.500 0.9999 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 9/6/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000 3/3/95 0.5000 1.0001 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 9/2/95 0.5 1.0001 10 50

U 3600


### Date 0.500 a 1.0000 a 10.0000 cr 50.Q000 a 100.0000 

### a 3/2/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.1000 9/6/94 0.501 1.0010 10.0000 50.0001 100-0001 3/3/95 0.5000 1.00 10.00 50.00 100.00



### tl 

# a5American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 260-7111
Meter Box Calibration Data Fcrm (English Units)

Date Barome*ric Pressure Meter Box Number 9/22/95 25.54 RAC #145-569
Average Yi Average aH Calibrated By Std. Meter Yi 0.985 1.812 VBB - RBB 0.99497

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter CH/13.6 Wet Test Meter Setting AH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp.

0.50 4.85 5 70 0.03676 68 

### 71 1.00

_ 4.81 5 70 0.07353 68



### _ 71 1.50 9.711 10 70 0.11029 68 

### 71 2.00 9.683 10 69 0.14706 63 

### 70 3.00 9.458 10 69 0.22059 67 

### 70 4.00 9.469 10 70 0.29412 63 

### 71 Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 (Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi AH

71 75 73.50 11.14 0.9738 1.7109 

### 72 76 72 78 76.00 8.09 0.9639 1.8262 

### 74 80 76 85 82.25 12.89 0.9880 1.6865 

### 79 89 83 96 91.00 11.55 0.9996 1.7870 

### 85 100 87 107 98.00 9.57 0.9879 1.8975 

### 89 109 91 113 102.50 8.46 0.9923 1.9642 

### 92 114 Average Yi Average Z

~ H 0.985 1.812Company: Interstate Bricfc

Source: Kiln #3 Inlet Span: 1000 Ana(yzer Caiibration Cylinder Analyzer Absolute Value Response Difference (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 0 0 0.00 525.5 535.5 10.00 899.5 900.1 0.60

Svstem Calibration Analyzer System Absolute Response Response Difference (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 0 -0.2 0.20 535.5 518.1 17.40 na na 0.00

Samole $j/stem Bias #1 Initial Analyzer System System Response Calibration Bias (ppm) (°% of span) 0 -0.2 -0.02 535.5 518.1 -1.74
Sample Svstem Bias #2 Initiai

: Analyzer System System

Response Calibration Bias (ppm) (% of span) 0 0.2 0.02 535.5 525.1 -1.04

Samole Svstem Bias #3 Initial Analyzer System System Response Calibration Bias (ppm) (% of span) 0 0.4 0.04 535.5 523.2 -1.23 Date: 10/31-95 Sample Gas: NOx

Difference (°i6 of span)

0.00 1.00 0.06

Difference (°% of span)

0.02 1.74 0.00

Final System System Drift Calibration Bias (% of span)

(% ofspan) 0.2 0.02 0.04 525.1 -1.04 0.70

Final System System Drift Calibration Bias (% of span)

(% of span) 0.4 0.04 0.02 523.2 -1.23 0.19

Final System System Drift Calibration Bias (% of span)

(% of span) 0.5 0.05 0.01 520.7 -1.48 0.25



# A9-:?Company: Interstate Bricic Date: 10/31-95 Source: Kiln #3 Inlet Sample Gas: CO Span: 1000
Analyzer Caiibration Cylinder Anaiyzer Absolute Difference Value Response Difference (% of span) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 0 0 0.00 0.00 324.0 326.1 2.10 0.21 646.8 647.3 0.50 0.05

Svstem Calibration Analyzer System Absolute Difference Response Response Difference (% of span) " (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)

0 1 1.00 0.10 326.1 325.8 0.30 0.03 na na 0.00 0.00



### Samgle Svstem Bias #1 

### Initial Final Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) (ppm) (% of span) (°% of span) 0 1 0.10 0.3 0.03 0.07 326.1 325.8 -0.03 328.8 0.27 0.30

SamQle Svstem Bias #2 Initial Final . Ana(yzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) (ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 0 0.3 0.03 0.7 0.07 0.04 326.1 328.8 0.27 324.1 -0.20 0.47

$a nRle Svstem Bias #3 Initial Final Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) (ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 0 0.7 0.07 0.3 0.03 0.04 326.1 324.1 -0.20 311.8 -1.43 1.23

, 

# ~ a- 0Company: Interstate Bricfc Date: 10/31-95 Source: Kiln #3 Inlet Sample Gas: S02 Span: 1000
Analyzer Calibration Cylinder Analyzer Absolute Difference Value Response Difference (% of span) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 0 -1 1.00 0.10 514.6 516.6 2.00 0.20 901.6 901.3 0.30 0.03

Svstem Calibration Analyzer System Absolute Difference Response Response Difference (% of span) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) -1 -0.6 0.40 0.04 516.6 518.1 1.50 0.15 na na 0.00 0.00



## _ ample Svstem Bias #1 Initial Final Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (°% of span) (ppm) (% of span) (% of span) -1 -0.6 0.04 0 0.10 0.06 516.6 518.1 0.15 507.1 -0.95 1.10
Sample Svstem Bias #2 Initial Final Anaiyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Caiibration Bias (°% of span) (ppm) (% of span) 

### (°10 of span) -1 0 0.10 1.3 0.23 0.13 516.6 507.1 -0.95 505.5 -1.11 0.16



## - ample Svstem Bias #3 Initial Finai Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) (ppm) (% of span) (°rb of span) -1 1.3 0.23 1.6 0.26 0.03 516.6 505.5 -1.11 507.3 -0.93 0.18

1-Company: Interstate Bricfc Date: 10/31-95 Source: Kiln #3 Outlet Sample Gas: S02 Span: 100

Analtizer Catibration Cyiinder Anaiyzer Absolute Difference Value Response Difference (% of span) (ppm) (ppm) (pp n) 0 -0.1 0.10 0.10 54.5 55.1 0.60 0.60 

### 88.4 88.6 0.20 0.20

System Calibration Analyzer System Absolute DifPerence Response Response Difference (% of span) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) -0.1 0.2 0.30 0.30 na na 0.00 0.00 88.6 88.8 0.20 0.20

Samole $_ystem Bias #1 Initial Finaf Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (°% of span) (ppm) (% of span) (°,% of span) -0.1 0.2 0.30 0.3 0.40 0.10 88.6 88.8 0.20 88.8 0.20 0.00

SamQle Svstem Bias #2 Initiai Final Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Caiibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) (ppm) (% of span) (% of span) -0.1 0.3 0.40 0.2 0.30 0.10 

### 88.6 88.8 0.20 88.3

- 

### 0.30 0.50
Samgle Svstem Bias #3 Initial Finaf Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (°r6 of span) (ppm) (% of span) (% of span) -0.1 0.2 0.30 0 0.10 0.20 88.6 88.3 -0.30 88.7 0.10 0.40



## ~~~Company: Interstate Brick Date: 10/31-95

Source: Kiln #3 Outlet Sample Gas: CO 

### Span: 1000

Analvzer Calibration

_ Cylinder Analyzer Absolute Difference Value Response Difference (% of span) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 0 -0.1 0.10 0.01 32.4 32.1 0.30 0.03 62.7 61.8 0.90 0.09

Svstem Calibration Analyzer System Absolute Difference Response Response Difference (% of span) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) -0.1 0.9 1.00 0.10
na na 0.00 0.00 61.8 61.7 0.10 0.01

_Samole Svstem Bias #1 Initial Final Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

### (pp m ) (% of span) (% of span) -0.1 0.9 0.10 0 0.01 0.09 646.8 646.8 0.00 651.7 0.49 0.49

Samole Svstem Bias #2 Initial Final Analyzer System System System System Drift 

### Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) (pp m ) (% of span) (% of span) -0,1 0 0.01 0 0.01 0.00 646.8 651.7 0.49 647.3 0.05 0.44
Sample Svstem Bias #3 Initial Final Analyzer System System System System Drift Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) (pp m ) (% of span) (% of span) -0.1 0 0.01 0 0.01 0.00

- 646.8 647.3 0.05 647.7 0.09 0.04



### ~~ 

# ,1l Company: Interstate Bricic

Source: Kiln #3 Outlet Span: 100

AnalYzer Calibratio Cylinder Analyzer Value Response (ppm) (ppm) 0 -0.2 53.4 53.2 87.3 87.2 Date: 10/31-95 Sample Gas: NOx

Absoiute Difference Difference (% of span) (ppm) 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10

System Calibration Analyzer System

- Response Response

(ppm) (ppm) -0.2 0.4 

### na na 87.2 87.6

5amole Svstem Bias #1 Analyzer System Response Calibration (ppm) -0.2 0.4 87.2 87.6
Sample Svstem Bias #2 Analyzer System Response Calibration (ppm) -0.2 0.1 87.2 87.7
Sample System Bias #3 Analyzer System Response Calibration (ppm) -0.2 0.6 87.2 87.7 Absolute Difference Difference (°% of span) (ppm) 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40

Initial Finai 

### System System System Drift Bias Calibration Bias (°% of span) (% of span) (% of span) 0.60 0.1 0.30 0.30 0.40 87.7 0.50 0.10

Initial Final System System System Drift Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

### (% of span) (% of span) 0.30 0.6 0.80 0.50 0.50 87.7 0.50 0.00

Initial Final System System System Drift Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) (% of span) (% of span) 0.80 0 0.20 0.60 0.50 87.6 0.40 0.10



# ~ 

# 3 z