alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 (the
Report) by CGI Group Inc. (the Company), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 23, 2013



/s/ R. David AndersonR. David AndersonExecutive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

-------------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.

 Debtors.1

-------------------------------------------------------------x 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY

On May 26, 2017, Lourdes Perdigón Acevedo (the “Movant”) filed a motion (the 

“Motion”) seeking relief from the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (as incorporated 

by 48 U.S.C. § 2161) with respect to the continuation of a civil lawsuit against the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth”), civil case no. FAC2016-1989 (the 

“Action”). On June 8, 2017, the Commonwealth and Movant filed a joint motion (the “Joint 

Motion”) indicating that each party consented to the relief sought in the Motion. Based upon the 

Court’s review of the Motion and the Joint Motion, it is hereby 

ORDERED, that the automatic stay, in effect pursuant 48 U.S.C. § 2161 is hereby 

terminated so that Movant may continue to pursue the Action; and it is further 

ORDERED, that this Court shall retain jurisdiction in connection with all matters arising 

in or arising out of the implementation of this Order; and it is further 

[remainder of page intentionally left blank] 

 

 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number 

listed as a bankruptcy case number due to software limitations and the last four (4) digits of each 

Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); and 

(ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3284) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:280 Filed:06/08/17 Entered:06/08/17 17:10:20 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
ORDERED, that this Order resolves docket entry nos. 229 and 272. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 8, 2017 

 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

 United States District Judge 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:280 Filed:06/08/17 Entered:06/08/17 17:10:20 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

#### § 21.79 Transferability.

Provisional type certificates are not transferable.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE01416

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
EXHIBIT 11

                   US FACILITIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share

         The computation of per share income is based upon the weighted  average
number of common and common  equivalent shares  outstanding  during each quarter
ended March 31, as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  (000 Omitted)


                                                       1997              1996
                                                       ----              ----
<S>                                                  <C>               <C>
Net Income                                           $3,660            $3,808
                                                     ======            ======


Weighted average shares outstanding during
the period                                            5,960             5,821

Common stock equivalent shares                          134               156
                                                    -------            ------

Common and common stock equivalent shares
outstanding for purposes of calculating
income per share                                      6,094             5,979

Incremental shares to reflect full dilution               6                 2
                                                     ------            ------ 

Total shares for purpose of calculating fully
diluted income per share                              6,100             5,981
                                                      =====             =====


Primary net income per share                        $  0.60           $  0.64
                                                    =======           =======

Fully diluted net income per share                  $  0.60           $  0.64
                                                    =======           =======

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3011-1 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:13:55 Desc:Exhibit A - Notice of Appearance Page 1 of 3Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3011-1 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:13:55 Desc:Exhibit A - Notice of Appearance Page 2 of 3Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3011-1 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:13:55 Desc:Exhibit A - Notice of Appearance Page 3 of 3
#### § 161.323 Notification of a decision not to implement a restriction.

If a Stage 3 restriction has been approved by the FAA and the restriction is not subsequently implemented, the applicant shall so advise the interested parties specified in § 161.309(a) of this part.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.502 Acceptance of articles. An article (including an article produced under a letter of TSO design approval) manufactured in a foreign country or jurisdiction meets the requirements for acceptance under this subchapter if— ( a ) That country or jurisdiction is subject to the provisions of an agreement with the United States for the acceptance of that article;
( b ) That article is marked in accordance with part 45 of this chapter; and
( c ) An export airworthiness approval has been issued in accordance with the provisions of that agreement for that article for import into the United States.
§ 1212.500 Exemptions under 5 U.S.C. 552a (j) and (k). ( a ) These provisions authorize the Administrator of NASA to exempt certain NASA Privacy Act systems of records from portions of the requirements of this regulation.
( b ) The Administrator has delegated this authority to the Associate Administrator (See § 1212.701).
( c ) For those NASA systems of records that are determined to be exempt, the system notice shall describe the exemption and the reasons.
[57 FR 4928, Feb. 11, 1992, as amended at 77 FR 60621, Oct. 4, 2012; NASA-21-091; NASA-2021-0007, 88 FR 12149, Feb. 27, 2023]
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

No. 17-1743

IN RE: COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING 

CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina

Debtors

___________________________________________

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING 

CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina

Debtors - Appellees

MONSITA LECAROZ-ARRIBAS

Trustee - Appellee

v.

ANGEL RUIZ-RIVERA

Movant - Appellant

MANDATE

Entered: February 8, 2018

In accordance with the judgment of September 7, 2017, and pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 41(a), this constitutes the formal mandate of this Court. 

By the Court:

/s/ Margaret Carter, Clerk

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2558 Filed:02/20/18 Entered:02/20/18 17:02:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
cc: 

Alberto Juan Enrique Aneses-Negron

Ehud Barak

Diana M. Batlle-Barasorda

Hermann D. Bauer-Alvarez

Antonio Juan Bennazar-Zequeira

Martin J. Bienenstock

Wandymar Burgos-Vargas

Juan J. Casillas-Ayala

Luc A. Despins

Ubaldo M. Fernandez

Financial Oversight and Management Board

Stephan E. Hornung

Monsita Lecaroz-Arribas

Michael Luskin

Timothy William Mungovan

Daniel J. Perez Refojos

Stephen L. Ratner

Angel Ruiz-Rivera

US Trustee

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2558 Filed:02/20/18 Entered:02/20/18 17:02:43 Desc: Main 

Document Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         749,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,013,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                    38,099
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,815,885
<PP&E>                                       3,444,897
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,393,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,867,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,160,355
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,706,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,867,114
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,622,722
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,750,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                34,604
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (162,816)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (162,816)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (162,816)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.58)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6843]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Sixth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security 
Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224 meeting: Airport Security 
Access Control Systems (Update to DO-230B).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security Access Control 
Systems

DATES: The meeting will be held April 13, 2011, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036 in the MacIntosh-NBAA Room and Hilton- 
ATA Room.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036, telephone (202) 833-9339, fax (202) 
833-9434, Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., and Appendix 2), 
notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems (Update to DO-230B):

Agenda

April 13, 2011

     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
     Review/Approve Summary--Fifth Meeting.
     Report on Security Construction Guidelines Process.
     Final Revision Review--Revised DO-230B.
     Briefing Preparations--Program Management Committee (PMC).
     Plans for Next Version.
     Any Other Business.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 16, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-6843 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### Pearson v. Watkins

*Frank McGuigan,*for plaintiff.

*Nelson A. Bryan,*for defendants.

*206August 16, 1957.

Aponick, P. J.,

This is an action of mandamus brought against the School Directors of the School District of Hanover Township by a professional employe of the district. To the complaint, defendants have filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, claiming that plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action.

The facts set forth in the complaint are as follows: Plaintiff was appointed a teacher in the school district in January, 1928. Upon the enactment of the Teachers’ Tenure Act, a written contract was entered into in conformity therewith and a valid and binding contract is still in force. On August 20, 1945, plaintiff was named as principal of the Benjamin Franklin High School and served as such until September 11, 1950, when he was designated assistant supervising principal. He acted in that capacity until the beginning of the school term on September 5, 1956. During the summer of that year, the board of school directors adopted a resolution abolishing the position of assistant supervising principal and directing plaintiff’s assignment to such duties as a professional employe for which he is properly certified. Thereafter, he was notified that he was to teach in the sixth, seventh and eighth grades at the Lynwood School.

Plaintiff further alleges that this assignment constituted a demotion both in salary and type of position without his consent in violation of the provisions of the Public School Code of March 10, 1949, P. L. 30, art. XI, sec. 1151, 24 PS §11-1151. He then prays that the court order defendants to assign him as a principal in one of the schools of the district and to permit him to carry out the duties thereof and pay to plaintiff the moneys due and to become due under the salary schedule to which such a principal is, by law, entitled.

*207We are all of the opinion that plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought. The assignment of teachers is not ministerial, but discretionary, within the limitations of the code, and mandamus is not the proper remedy: Commonwealth ex rel. Wesenberg v. Bethlehem School District, 148 Pa. Superior Ct. 250, 257.

Accordingly, the' preliminary objections of defendants are sustained.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09225**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09225\09225_ HardcopyLog_Template.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09225\09225_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09225\09225_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 09225\09225_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09225\09225_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09225\09225_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09225\09225_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09225\09225_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_A5-2_Map 1_ FM station aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_A5-2_Map 2_FM disposal site aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_A5-2_Map 3_FM station topo.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_A5-2_Map 4_FM disposal site topo.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09225\Supporting Documents\09225_A5-2_Map 5_FM outfalls.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_A5-3_WB-1_FM.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_A5-3_WB-2_FM.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_FMPOND-1_D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_FMPOND-2_D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_FMWWT-1_D-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_FMWWT-1_D-3A.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_Fort Martin D5-10 PWGAEF-0047 WasteWaterTreatment Evaluatio.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_Fort Martin D5-10 FGD WWT PO 4500048373.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_Fort Martin FGD Performance Testing Analytical Results.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_Fort Martin Gypsum MSDS.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_FT Martin D5-10 IDI Proposal.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09225\Supporting Documents\09225_Ft. Martin D5-10 WWT Conf Spec.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09225\09225_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 25.1141 Powerplant controls: general. Each powerplant control must be located, arranged, and designed under §§ 25.777 through 25.781 and marked under § 25.1555. In addition, it must meet the following requirements: ( a ) Each control must be located so that it cannot be inadvertently operated by persons entering, leaving, or moving normally in, the cockpit.
( b ) Each flexible control must be approved or must be shown to be suitable for the particular application.
( c ) Each control must have sufficient strength and rigidity to withstand operating loads without failure and without excessive deflection.
( d ) Each control must be able to maintain any set position without constant attention by flight crewmembers and without creep due to control loads or vibration.
( e ) The portion of each powerplant control located in a designated fire zone that is required to be operated in the event of fire must be at least fire resistant.
( f ) For powerplant valve controls located in the flight deck there must be a means: ( 1 ) For the flightcrew to select each intended position or function of the valve; and
( 2 ) To indicate to the flightcrew: ( i ) The selected position or function of the valve; and
( ii ) When the valve has not responded as intended to the selected position or function.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-40, 42 FR 15044, Mar. 17, 1977; Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29785, July 20, 1990; Amdt. 25-115, 69 FR 40527, July 2, 2004]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 03, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 03, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24A1138. ERIK SOOTES v. TATIANA SOOTES.
The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On April 22, 2024, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than May 02, 2024. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
R18-2-514. Renumbered

Historical Note

Adopted effective May 14, 1979 (Supp. 79-1). Amended effective October 2, 1979 (Supp.

79-5). Amended effective July 9, 1980 (Supp. 80-4). Former Section R9-3-514 

renumbered without change as Section R18-2-514 (Supp. 87-3). Amended effective 

September 26, 1990 (Supp. 90-3). Renumbered to R18-2-714 effective November 14,

1993 (Supp. 93-4).

R18-2-714. Standards of Performance for Existing Sewage Treatment Plants

A. No person shall cause, allow or permit to be emitted into the atmosphere, from any 

municipal sewage treatment plant sludge incinerator:

1. Smoke, fumes, gases, particulate matter or other gas-borne material which exceeds 20% 

opacity for more than 30 seconds in any 60-minute period.

2. Particulate matter in concentrations in excess of 0.1 grain per cubic foot, based on dry 

flue gas at standard conditions, corrected to 12% carbon dioxide.

B. The owner or operator of any sludge incinerator subject to the provisions of this Section 

shall monitor operations by doing all of the following:

1. Install, calibrate, maintain and operate a flow measuring device which can be used to 

determine either the mass or volume of sludge charged to the incinerator. The flow 

measuring device shall have an accuracy of ± 5% over its operating range.

2. Provide access to the sludge charged so that a well-mixed representative grab sample 

of the sludge can be obtained.

3. Install, calibrate, maintain and operate a weighing device for determining the mass of 

any municipal solid waste charged to the incinerator when sewage sludge and 

municipal solid wastes are incinerated together. The weighing device shall have an 

accuracy of ± 5% over its operating range.

C. The test methods and procedures required by this Section are as follows:

1. The reference methods set forth in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A shall be used to determine 

compliance with the standards prescribed in subsection (A) as follows:

a. Method 5 for concentration of particulate matter and associated moisture content;

b. Method 1 for sample and velocity traverses;

c. Method 2 for volumetric flow rate; and

d. Method 3 for gas analysis.

2. For Method 5, the sampling time for each run shall be at least 60 minutes and the 

sampling rate shall be at least 0.015 dscm/min (0.53 dscf/min), except that shorter 

sampling times, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be 

approved by the Director.

Historical Note

Section R18-2-714 renumbered from R18-2-514 effective November 15, 1993 (Supp. 93-

4).