alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐x 

In re:                  PROMESA  

                  Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND  

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

  as representative of   

                  No. 17 BK 3283‐LTS  

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.,                 (Jointly Administered) 

      Debtors.1

  

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐x 

ORDER 

  This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion by the American Federation of State, 

County and Municipal Employees, AFL‐CIO (AFSCME), American Federation of Teachers, AFL‐CIO 

(AFT), International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers 

of America, AFL‐CIO (UAW), and Service Employees International Union (SEIU) for an Order 

Authorizing Discovery Under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 (Dkt. No. 2595) (the “Motion”).  The matter 

is currently noticed for hearing on April 25, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. as part of this Court’s April 

Omnibus Hearing.  The parties to the Motion are hereby ordered to meet and confer regarding 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the 

last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284‐LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees 

Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3566‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power 

Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) 

(Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

   

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2768 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 14:59:52 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 

a revised hearing date to take place in Boston, Massachusetts.  Judge Dein is available to hear 

the Motion on April 19 or 20, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.  The parties shall submit a status report to this 

Court on or before March 23, 2018 informing the Court of their availability.  The parties shall 

include a revised proposed briefing schedule for the Motion. 

SO ORDERED.           

/ s / Judith Gail Dein               

Judith Gail Dein 

              United States Magistrate Judge  

DATED: March 19, 2018 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2768 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 14:59:52 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4039 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the permissible first-dollar coverage of telehealth services for purposes of health 

savings accounts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 23, 2020 

Mrs. LOEFFLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the permissible first-dollar coverage of telehealth services for purposes of health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telemedicine Every5 where Lifting Everyone’s Healthcare Experience And 

6 Long Term Health HSA Act of 2020’’ or the ‘‘TELE7 HEALTH HSA Act of 2020’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4039 IS

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXEMPTION FOR TELEHEALTH SERV2 ICES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (E) of section 

4 223(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend5 ed by striking ‘‘In the case of plan years beginning on 

6 or before December 31, 2021, a plan’’ and inserting ‘‘A 

7 plan’’. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Clause (ii) of sec9 tion 223(c)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

10 is amended by striking ‘‘(in the case of plan years begin11 ning on or before December 31, 2021)’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to plan years beginning after De14 cember 31, 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAID.

The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAID.                    

*Date:*                         June 5-7, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate personal qualifications and performance, and competence of individual investigators.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Sheldon M. Wolff Memorial Conference Room (11S235), 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Thomas J. Kindt, PhD, Director, Division of Intramural Research, National Inst. of Allergy and Infections Diseases, Building 10, Room 4A31, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301 496-3006, tk9c@nih.gov

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 21, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-10789  Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 11
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

§ 11.73 How does FAA process petitions for rulemaking? After we have determined the disposition of your petition, we will contact you in writing about our decision. The FAA may respond to your petition for rulemaking in one of the following ways: ( a ) If we determine that your petition justifies our taking the action you suggest, we may issue an NPRM or ANPRM. We will do so no later than 6 months after the date we receive your petition. In making our decision, we consider: ( 1 ) The immediacy of the safety or security concerns you raise;
( 2 ) The priority of other issues the FAA must deal with; and
( 3 ) The resources we have available to address these issues.
( b ) If we have issued an ANPRM or NPRM on the subject matter of your petition, we will consider your arguments for a rule change as a comment in connection with the rulemaking proceeding. We will not treat your petition as a separate action.
( c ) If we have begun a rulemaking project in the subject area of your petition, we will consider your comments and arguments for a rule change as part of that project. We will not treat your petition as a separate action.
( d ) If we have tasked ARAC to study the general subject area of your petition, we will ask ARAC to review and evaluate your proposed action. We will not treat your petition as a separate action.
( e ) If we determine that the issues you identify in your petition may have merit, but do not address an immediate safety concern or cannot be addressed because of other priorities and resource constraints, we may dismiss your petition. Your comments and arguments for a rule change will be placed in a database, which we will examine when we consider future rulemaking.
§ 16.211 Prehearing conference. ( a ) *Prehearing conference notice.* The hearing officer schedules a prehearing conference and serves a prehearing conference notice on the parties promptly after being designated as a hearing officer. ( 1 ) The prehearing conference notice specifies the date, time, place, and manner (in person or by telephone) of the prehearing conference.
( 2 ) The prehearing conference notice may direct the parties to exchange proposed witness lists, requests for evidence and the production of documents in the possession of another party, responses to interrogatories, admissions, proposed procedural schedules, and proposed stipulations before the date of the prehearing conference.
( b ) *The prehearing conference.* The prehearing conference is conducted by telephone or in person, at the hearing officer's discretion. The prehearing conference addresses matters raised in the prehearing conference notice and such other matters as the hearing officer determines will assist in a prompt, full and fair hearing of the issues.
( c ) *Prehearing conference report.* At the close of the prehearing conference, the hearing officer rules on any requests for evidence and the production of documents in the possession of other parties, responses to interrogatories, and admissions; on any requests for depositions; on any proposed stipulations; and on any pending applications for subpoenas as permitted by § 16.219. In addition, the hearing officer establishes the schedule, which shall provide for the issuance of an initial decision not later than 110 days after issuance of the Director's Determination order unless otherwise provided in the hearing order.
[Doc. No. 27783, 61 FR 54004, Oct. 16, 1996, as amended at Amdt. 16-1, 78 FR 56147, Sept. 12, 2013]
§ 1262.109 Delegations of authority. ( a ) The NASA Administrator hereby delegates authority to the General Counsel or designee to take final action on matters pertaining to the Act, other than the authority for final fee determination after Agency review pursuant to § 1262.308.
( b ) The NASA Administrator may, in particularly specified matters under the Act, delegate authority to officials other than those designated in paragraph (a) of this section.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

and the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost
Plus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 4, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Barry J. Feld, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, and Jane L. Baughman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ BARRY J. FELD                                                                               
|Barry J. Feld Chief Executive Officer, President (Principal Executive Officer)                  
|                                                                                                
|September 13, 2007                                                                              
|                                                                                                
|/s/ JANE L. BAUGHMAN                                                                            
|Jane L. Baughman Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|                                                                                                
|September 13, 2007
§ 158.13 Use of PFC revenue. PFC revenue, including any interest earned after such revenue has been remitted to a public agency, may be used only to finance the allowable costs of approved projects at any airport the public agency controls. ( a ) *Total cost.* PFC revenue may be used to pay all or part of the allowable cost of an approved project.
( b ) *PFC administrative support costs.* Public agencies may use PFC revenue to pay for allowable administrative support costs. Public agencies must submit these costs as a separate project in each PFC application.
( c ) *Maximum cost for certain low-emission technology projects.* If a project involves a vehicle or ground support equipment using low emission technology eligible under § 158.15(b), the FAA will determine the maximum cost that may be financed by PFC revenue. The maximum cost for a new vehicle is the incremental amount between the purchase price of a new low emission vehicle and the purchase price of a standard emission vehicle, or the cost of converting a standard emission vehicle to a low emission vehicle.
( d ) *Bond-associated debt service and financing costs.* ( 1 ) Public agencies may use PFC revenue to pay debt service and financing costs incurred for a bond issued to carry out approved projects.
( 2 ) If the public agency's bond documents require that PFC revenue be commingled in the general revenue stream of the airport and pledged for the benefit of holders of obligations, the FAA considers PFC revenue to have paid the costs covered in § 158.13(d)(1) if— ( i ) An amount equal to the part of the proceeds of the bond issued to carry out approved projects is used to pay allowable costs of such projects; and
( ii ) To the extent the PFC revenue collected in any year exceeds the debt service and financing costs on such bonds during that year, an amount equal to the excess is applied as required by § 158.39.
( e ) *Exception providing for the use of PFC revenue to pay for debt service for non-eligible projects.* The FAA may authorize a public agency under § 158.18 to impose a PFC for payments for debt service on indebtedness incurred to carry out an airport project that is not eligible if the FAA determines that such use is necessary because of the financial need of the airport.
( f ) *Combination of PFC revenue and Federal grant funds.* A public agency may combine PFC revenue and airport grant funds to carry out an approved project. These projects are subject to the record keeping and auditing requirements of this part, as well as the reporting, record keeping and auditing requirements imposed by the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 (AAIA).
( g ) *Non-Federal share.* Public agencies may use PFC revenue to meet the non-Federal share of the cost of projects funded under the Federal airport grant program or the FAA “Program to Permit Cost-Sharing of Air Traffic Modernization Projects” under 49 U.S.C. 44517.
( h ) *Approval of project following approval to impose a PFC.* The public agency may not use PFC revenue or interest earned thereon except on an approved project.
[Doc. No. 26385, 56 FR 24278, May 29, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 158-4, 72 FR 28847, May 23, 2007]
Editorial Note on Part 183
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 183.61 Records and reports. ( a ) Each ODA Holder must ensure that the following records are maintained for the duration of the authorization: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) For any approval or certificate issued by an ODA Unit member (except those airworthiness certificates and approvals not issued in support of type design approval projects): ( i ) The application and data required to be submitted under this chapter to obtain the certificate or approval; and
( ii ) The data and records documenting the ODA Unit member's approval or determination of compliance.
( 3 ) A list of the products, components, parts, or appliances for which ODA Unit members have issued a certificate or approval.
( 4 ) The names, responsibilities, qualifications and example signature of each member of the ODA Unit who performs an authorized function.
( 5 ) A copy of each manual approved or accepted by the ODA Unit, including all historical changes.
( 6 ) Training records for ODA Unit members and ODA administrators.
( 7 ) Any other records specified in the ODA Holder's procedures manual.
( 8 ) The procedures manual required under § 183.53 of this part, including all changes.
( b ) Each ODA Holder must ensure that the following are maintained for five years: ( 1 ) A record of each periodic audit and any corrective actions resulting from them; and
( 2 ) A record of any reported service difficulties associated with approvals or certificates issued by an ODA Unit member.
( c ) For airworthiness certificates and approvals not issued in support of a type design approval project, each ODA Holder must ensure the following are maintained for two years; ( 1 ) The application and data required to be submitted under this chapter to obtain the certificate or approval; and
( 2 ) The data and records documenting the ODA Unit member's approval or determination of compliance.
( d ) For all records required by this section to be maintained, each ODA Holder must: ( 1 ) Ensure that the records and data are available to the Administrator for inspection at any time;
( 2 ) Submit all records and data to the Administrator upon surrender or termination of the authorization.
( e ) Each ODA Holder must compile and submit any report required by the Administrator to exercise his supervision of the ODA Holder.
[Doc. No. FAA-2003-16685, 70 FR 59947, Oct. 13, 2005, as amended by Amdt. 183-14, 76 FR 8893, Feb. 16, 2011]
```

                                  Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the annual filing of Meier Worldwide Intermedia, a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10KSB for the period ended October 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Harry Evans, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/ Harry Evans

Harry Evans
Director

March 10, 2003
```
#### Florida Chautauqua Association, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company *et al., Appellants*v. Minnie I. Brown and Husband, *Appellees.*

In case of a doubtful dedication of a public street by plats, an easement will not be declared in favor of one who has himself fenced off the public from the locus m *quo,*which has had buildings placed thereon by the supposed dedicator and others for more than twenty-five years.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*Blount*& *Blount*& *Carter, Daniel Campbell*& *Bon*and *B. K. GilUs,*for Appellants;

*Wm. W. Flournoy,*for Appellees.

Cockrell, J.

— Upon the former appeal from the order sustaining the demurrer in this case, 59 Fla. 447, 52 South. Rep. 802, we held that the bill stated a case of special injury, giving the complainants peculiar rights not suffered by the general public, to the free use of ¿Baldwin Avenue, the alleged boundary of complainants’ property.*422The case is again before us on final decree, against the defense that the property does not touch Baldwin Avenue, and that whatever rights may have existed are barred by estoppel or lapse of time.

We think the evidence clearly shows as in this kindred case of McGourin v. Town of DeFuniak Springs, 51 Fla. 502, 41 South. Rep. 541, that Baldwin Avenue lies wholly north of the railroad tracks and hence does not touch complainants’ property, and moreover that the complainants by their own act of fencing off the space between their hotel grounds and the railroad tracks recognized this fact for many years, and up to the filing of their bill.

The evidence shows that the public never recognized, occupied or used the *locus in quo*as a street, or made any claim thereto until the abortive attempt to have it so declared in the McGourin case, although the railroad company and others for a quarter of a century placed buildings of a permanent nature in the supposed street.

We do not know whether facts *in pias*may show a dedication of Baldwin Avenue south of the railroad tracks, east of the station and west of the Brown property, but the complainants fail to show a present easement as between those two points, the sole basis for their equity, and the decree is accordingly reversed with directions to dismiss the bill.

Whitfield, C. J., and Taylor, Shackleford and Hooker, J: J., concur.
§ 23.2120 Climb requirements. The design must comply with the following minimum climb performance out of ground effect: ( a ) With all engines operating and in the initial climb configuration(s)— ( 1 ) For levels 1 and 2 low-speed airplanes, a climb gradient of 8.3 percent for landplanes and 6.7 percent for seaplanes and amphibians; and
( 2 ) For levels 1 and 2 high-speed airplanes, all level 3 airplanes, and level 4 single-engines a climb gradient after takeoff of 4 percent.
( b ) After a critical loss of thrust on multiengine airplanes— ( 1 ) For levels 1 and 2 low-speed airplanes that do not meet single-engine crashworthiness requirements, a climb gradient of 1.5 percent at a pressure altitude of 5,000 feet (1,524 meters) in the cruise configuration(s);
( 2 ) For levels 1 and 2 high-speed airplanes, and level 3 low-speed airplanes, a 1 percent climb gradient at 400 feet (122 meters) above the takeoff surface with the landing gear retracted and flaps in the takeoff configuration(s); and
( 3 ) For level 3 high-speed airplanes and all level 4 airplanes, a 2 percent climb gradient at 400 feet (122 meters) above the takeoff surface with the landing gear retracted and flaps in the approach configuration(s).
( c ) For a balked landing, a climb gradient of 3 percent without creating undue pilot workload with the landing gear extended and flaps in the landing configuration(s).
[Doc. No. FAA-2015-1621, Amdt. 23-64, 81 FR 96689, Dec. 30, 2016, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. 23-65, 87 FR 75710, Dec. 9, 2022]