alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 141.57 Special curricula.

An applicant for a pilot school certificate or provisional pilot school certificate may apply for approval to conduct a special course of airman training for which a curriculum is not prescribed in the appendixes of this part, if the applicant shows that the training course contains features that could achieve a level of pilot proficiency equivalent to that achieved by a training course prescribed in the appendixes of this part or the requirements of part 61 of this chapter.
Date: ~-· J_c::j 3/ a} d-O 1 S tJ:_ 4· _. LUfYVJ 

Meeting: IY\cetw'-1-fvl ~~ ~~ c...f:_ 

Ruie(s)Discussed: OzoYl~ fV M Q.S ~ R_e..~~~ ~ 1K.K_ Tbue.s 

Written Materials? Yes/No 

Name Organization Phone N urn ber
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 14, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130099 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff, Justices Counter-Defendant-Appellant, 

v SC: 130099 

 COA: 262759 

Oakland CC: 04-056953-CZ 

PRO-SEAL SERVICE GROUP, INC., d/b/a 

PRO-SEAL, INC.,

Defendant,

Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee,

and 

SETH SHORT, RANDY QUINCY, 

FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, and 

FLOWSERVE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(G)(1). The parties shall be prepared to address at oral argument: (1) whether 

Flowserve's complaint alleged an advertising injury within the meaning of the 

commercial general liability policy that Citizens Insurance Company issued to Pro-Seal, 

Inc, and (2) if so, whether Citizens was relieved of its duty to defend Pro-Seal by 

operation of the policy exclusion for actions taken with knowledge that an advertising 

injury would result. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date 

of this order, but they should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made 

in their application papers. 

t0411 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 14, 2006 

Clerk
# Official Journal L 131/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 131 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6616 May 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 131

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6616 May 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/944 of 17 January 2023 amending and correcting the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/587 as regards certain transparency requirements applicable to transactions in equity instruments  (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/945 of 17 January 2023 amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/583 as regards certain transparency requirements applicable to transactions in non-equity instruments  (
  1
  ) | 17 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/944 of 17 January 2023 amending and correcting the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/587 as regards certain transparency requirements applicable to transactions in equity instruments  (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/945 of 17 January 2023 amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/583 as regards certain transparency requirements applicable to transactions in non-equity instruments  (
  1
  )

1

17

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1758

IHEANYI EKEKE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; FRANK

VETRANO; ANN SCHNARE; ROBERT PARKER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-1665-A)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 18, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Iheanyi Ekeke, Appellant Pro Se. Diane Marshall Ennist, FEDERAL

HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, McLean, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in Appellant’s civil action. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Ekeke v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., No. CA-95-1665-A

(E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal L 67/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 67 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 652 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 67

English edition

Legislation

Volume 652 March 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2022/355 of 2 March 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/356 of 2 March 2022 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus | 103 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/355 of 2 March 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/356 of 2 March 2022 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus

103

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/337 of 28 February 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine ( OJ L 59, 28.2.2022 ) | 112 |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/336 of 28 February 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine ( OJ L 58, 28.2.2022 ) | 113 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/337 of 28 February 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine ( OJ L 59, 28.2.2022 )

( OJ L 59, 28.2.2022 )

112

*

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/336 of 28 February 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine ( OJ L 58, 28.2.2022 )

( OJ L 58, 28.2.2022 )

113

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.601 Applicability and definitions. ( a ) This subpart prescribes— ( 1 ) Procedural requirements for issuing TSO authorizations;
( 2 ) Rules governing the holders of TSO authorizations; and
( 3 ) Procedural requirements for issuing letters of TSO design approval.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart— ( 1 ) A TSO issued by the FAA is a minimum performance standard for specified articles used on civil aircraft;
( 2 ) A TSO authorization is an FAA design and production approval issued to the manufacturer of an article that has been found to meet a specific TSO;
( 3 ) A letter of TSO design approval is an FAA design approval for an article that has been found to meet a specific TSO in accordance with the procedures of § 21.621;
( 4 ) An article manufactured under a TSO authorization, an FAA letter of acceptance as described in § 21.613(b), or an article manufactured under a letter of TSO design approval described in § 21.621 is an approved article for the purpose of meeting the regulations of this chapter that require the article to be approved; and
( 5 ) An article manufacturer is the person who controls the design and quality of the article produced (or to be produced, in the case of an application), including any related parts, processes, or services procured from an outside source.
§ 161.415 Reevaluation action. ( a ) Upon completing the reevaluation, the FAA will issue appropriate orders regarding whether or not there is substantial evidence that the restriction meets the criteria in § 161.305 of this part.
( b ) If the FAA's reevaluation confirms that the restriction meets the criteria, the restriction may remain as previously agreed to or approved. If the FAA's reevaluation concludes that the restriction does not meet the criteria, the FAA will withdraw a previous approval of the restriction issued under subpart D of this part to the extent necessary to bring the restriction into compliance with this part or, with respect to a restriction agreed to under subpart B of this part, the FAA will specify which criteria are not met.
( c ) The FAA will publish a notice of its reevaluation findings in the Federal Register and notify in writing the aircraft operator that petitioned the FAA for reevaluation and the affected airport operator.
**CERTIFICATION**

|   | 1. | The                quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended                July                3, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in accordance                with United States generally accepted accounting principles, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/LARRY                W. SINGLETON Larry                W. SingletonPresident                andChief                Executive Officer/s/RICHARD                P. MCCOOK Richard                P. McCookExecutive                Vice President, ChiefFinancial                Officer and Treasurer |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
§ 13.107 Designation of additional parties. ( a ) The presiding officer may designate additional persons as parties to the investigation, if in the discretion of the presiding officer, it will aid in the conduct of the investigation.
( b ) The presiding officer may designate any person as a party to the investigation if— ( 1 ) The person petitions the presiding officer to participate as a party;
( 2 ) The disposition of the investigation may as a practical matter impair the ability to protect the person's interest unless allowed to participate as a party; and
( 3 ) The person's interest is not adequately represented by existing parties.
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

PROMESA

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND Title III

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as a representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al. (Jointly Administered)

Debtors

 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

NOW comes creditors HÉCTOR CESARIO SANTIAGO RIVERA and VIRGINIA DÍAZ 

DELGADO represented by the undersigned attorney, to state as follows.

That pursuant to provisions of Rule 9010(b) of Bankruptcy Procedure, the appearing party 

notifies that it has retained the legal services of Osvaldo Toledo Martinez whose address is:

Osvaldo Toledo Martínez

PO Box 190938

San Juan PR 00919-0938

E-Mail: toledo.bankruptcy@gmail.com

Telephone No.: (787) 756-6395

Fax No.: (787) 767-7965

WHEREFORE, the appearing party respectfully prays that the Clerk of the Court takes notice of 

the appearance of the undersigned attorney and to notify him of all the proceedings in this case, 

including but not limited to copies of the petition, schedules, motions, and statements filed or to be filed 

in the above-referenced case and further prays that the name and address be added to the Master 

Address List kept in the above-captioned case.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3381 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 13:43:22 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and exact copy of the foregoing was filed electronically with 

the clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which in turn will send notification of such filing to all 

interested parties of record.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

At San Juan, Puerto Rico, this June 29, 2018.

/S/ Osvaldo Toledo Martínez

OSVALDO TOLEDO MARTÍNEZ, ESQ.

USDC No. 127905

PO Box 190938

San Juan PR 00919-0938

Tel: (787) 756-6395

Fax: (787) 767-7965

E-Mail: toledo.bankruptcy@gmail.com

Counsel for Creditors

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3381 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 13:43:22 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11133]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Public meeting With the Community College of the Air Force Board 
of Visitors to Review and Discuss Academic Policies and Issues Relative 
to the Operation of the College

AGENCY: Community College of the Air Force; DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Community College of the Air Force (CCAF) Board of 
Visitors will hold a meeting to review and discuss academic policies 
and issues relative to the operation of the college. Agenda items 
include a review of the operations of the CCAF and an update on the 
activities of the CCAF Policy Council.
    Members of the public who wish to make oral or written statements 
at the meeting should contact First Lieutenant Matthew M. Groleau, 
Designated Federal Officer for the Board, at the address below no later 
than 4:00 p.m. on May 30, 2000. Please mail or electronically mail all 
requests. Telephone requests will not be honored. The request should 
identify the name of the individual who will make the presentation and 
an outline of the issues to be addressed. A minimum of 35 copies of the 
presentation materials must be given to First Lieutenant Groleau no 
later than three days prior to the time of the board meeting for 
distribution. Visual aids must be submitted to First Lieutenant Groleau 
on a 3\1/2\ inch computer disc in Microsoft PowerPoint format no later 
than 4:00 p.m. on May 30, 2000 to allow sufficient time for virus 
scanning and formatting of the slides.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 6, 2000 at 8:00 a.m. 
on the Main Floor Conference Room, Air University, Building 800, 130 
West Maxwell Boulevard, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: First Lieutenant Matthew M. Groleau, 
(334) 953-7322, Community College of the Air Force, 130 West Maxwell 
Boulevard, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, 36112-6613, or through 
electronic mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcb1bda8a8b4b9abf2bbaeb3b0b9bda99cb1bda4abb9b0b0f2bdbaf2b1b5b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f626e7b7b676a7821687d60636a6e7a4f626e77786a6363216e6921626663">[email protected]</span></a>.

Janet A. Long,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-11133 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL A. DORUNDO AND CYNTHIA M.

DORUNDO,

Petitioners

v.

ROBERT BOBACK,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 304 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of May, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
§ 147.23 Quality control system. ( a ) Each certificated aviation maintenance technician school must— ( 1 ) Be accredited within the meaning of 20 U.S.C. 1001(a)(5); or
( 2 ) Establish and maintain a quality control system that meets the requirements specified in paragraph (b) of this section, and is approved by the Administrator.
( b ) The quality control system specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section must provide procedures for recordkeeping, assessment, issuing credit, issuing of final course grades, attendance, ensuring sufficient number of instructors, granting of graduation documentation, and corrective action for addressing deficiencies.
§ 135.295 Initial and recurrent flight attendant crewmember testing requirements. No certificate holder may use a flight attendant crewmember, nor may any person serve as a flight attendant crewmember unless, since the beginning of the 12th calendar month before that service, the certificate holder has determined by appropriate initial and recurrent testing that the person is knowledgeable and competent in the following areas as appropriate to assigned duties and responsibilities— ( a ) Authority of the pilot in command;
( b ) Passenger handling, including procedures to be followed in handling deranged persons or other persons whose conduct might jeopardize safety;
( c ) Crewmember assignments, functions, and responsibilities during ditching and evacuation of persons who may need the assistance of another person to move expeditiously to an exit in an emergency;
( d ) Briefing of passengers;
( e ) Location and operation of portable fire extinguishers and other items of emergency equipment;
( f ) Proper use of cabin equipment and controls;
( g ) Location and operation of passenger oxygen equipment;
( h ) Location and operation of all normal and emergency exits, including evacuation chutes and escape ropes; and
( i ) Seating of persons who may need assistance of another person to move rapidly to an exit in an emergency as prescribed by the certificate holder's operations manual.
§ 25.1561 Safety equipment. ( a ) Each safety equipment control to be operated by the crew in emergency, such as controls for automatic liferaft releases, must be plainly marked as to its method of operation.
( b ) Each location, such as a locker or compartment, that carries any fire extinguishing, signaling, or other life saving equipment must be marked accordingly.
( c ) Stowage provisions for required emergency equipment must be conspicuously marked to identify the contents and facilitate the easy removal of the equipment.
( d ) Each liferaft must have obviously marked operating instructions.
( e ) Approved survival equipment must be marked for identification and method of operation.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-46, 43 FR 50598, Oct. 30, 1978]
§ 23.2615 Flight, navigation, and powerplant instruments. ( a ) Installed systems must provide the flightcrew member who sets or monitors parameters for the flight, navigation, and powerplant, the information necessary to do so during each phase of flight. This information must— ( 1 ) Be presented in a manner that the crewmember can monitor the parameter and determine trends, as needed, to operate the airplane; and
( 2 ) Include limitations, unless the limitation cannot be exceeded in all intended operations.
( b ) Indication systems that integrate the display of flight or powerplant parameters to operate the airplane or are required by the operating rules of this chapter must— ( 1 ) Not inhibit the primary display of flight or powerplant parameters needed by any flightcrew member in any normal mode of operation; and
( 2 ) In combination with other systems, be designed and installed so information essential for continued safe flight and landing will be available to the flightcrew in a timely manner after any single failure or probable combination of failures.