alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 125.367 Alternate airport for destination: IFR or over-the-top. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each person releasing an airplane for operation under IFR or over-the-top shall list at least one alternate airport for each destination airport in the flight release.
( b ) An alternate airport need not be designated for IFR or over-the-top operations where the airplane carries enough fuel to meet the requirements of §§ 125.375 and 125.377 for flights outside the 48 conterminous States and the District of Columbia over routes without an available alternate airport for a particular airport of destination.
( c ) For the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the weather requirements at the alternate airport must meet the requirements of the operator's operations specifications.
( d ) No person may release a flight unless that person lists each required alternate airport in the flight release.
#### §§ 1204.506-1204.507 [Reserved]
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending October 31, 2008(the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Ryan, Chief
Executive Officer, President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)                 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)                 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








December
      10, 2008
            /s/Christopher J.
      RyanChristopher
      J. RyanChief
      Executive Officer, President,Secretary
      and General Counsel







29
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Mica deposits in Minas Gerais,Brazil**
 
Report | Plates: 01020304
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:964-C
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000969927
 
September 27, 2018
Searched for **https://cio.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://cio.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

As representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.,

Debtors.

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS/Proof of claim 48181

(Jointly Administered)

OPPOSITION TO 587 OMNIBUS OBJECTION

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

COMES NOW, Zaida Nogue Resto (“Mrs. Nogue” or “Movant”), through the

undersigned counsel, to respectfully move the Court for an Order and, in support of her motion, 

states as follows:

1. In the 587th Omnibus Objection, the Debtor seeks to disallow the proof of claim of 

reference asserting as the reason that it purports to assert liabilities associated with the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, but fails to provide any basis or supporting 

documentation for asserting a claim against the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, such that 

the Debtors are unable to determine whether claimant has a valid claim against the 

Commonwealth.

2. However, in her proof of claim, Nogue did state that the basis of the claim is a pending 

legal action at the Bayamon Superior Court, under case # DDP2011-0553 against the 

Hospital Universitario of the Puerto Rican government, with no judgment.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24886 Filed:08/14/23 Entered:08/14/23 18:13:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

3. We communicated this information to counsel for debtor and requested that Debtor file a 

motion to withdraw the request. Although counsel for Debtor replied that they would 

inquire into the matter, we did not receive a response.

4. We were not able to file this motion earlier because this morning the subscriber had to 

take his wife to the hospital due to a medical emergency and had to attend to this matter 

all day. We attach a photograph of the identification label that shows the date and time 

that the subscriber reached the hospital this morning at 4:03 am.

WHEREFORE, Movant respectfully requests that the Court grant this motion and enter 

an order denying the request to disallow claim 48181.

Respectfully Submitted. In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this August 14th, 2023.

We certify that this motion has been filed using the CM/ECF case filing system which 

will notify all parties.

Olmo & Rodríguez-Matías Law Office, PSC

261 Ave. Domenech, SJ PR 00918

787.758.3570/jrolmo1@gmail.com

S/José R. Olmo-Rodríguez

José R. Olmo-Rodríguez

USDC-PR 213504

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24886 Filed:08/14/23 Entered:08/14/23 18:13:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     51,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,106
<PP&E>                                          10,047
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,681
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,636
<SALES>                                        285,493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               285,493
<CGS>                                          248,615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  248,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,988
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                       850
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                785
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       785
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13



</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August

20 , 2024
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 24

- 00522

- CV

ALCHEMY TENACITY, LLC, RICHARD PAUL BEAULLIEU, ALCHEMY

2018, LLC AND ALCHEMY 4, LLC , Appellant s

V. MTZ HOLDINGS, LLC , Appellee
On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2023

- 75394

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 27, 2024 . On July 2 6, 2024, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. We dismiss the appeal

. PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
§ 1271.605 Inspector General report. ( a ) The Inspector General, or other official as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, of each agency shall prepare and submit to Congress each year, commencing with submission of the President's Budget in 1991, an evaluation of the compliance of that agency with, and the effectiveness of, the requirements herein. The evaluation may include any recommended changes that may be necessary to strengthen or improve the requirements.
( b ) In the case of an agency that does not have an Inspector General, the agency official comparable to an Inspector General shall prepare and submit the annual report, or, if there is no such comparable official, the head of the agency shall prepare and submit the annual report.
( c ) The annual report shall be submitted at the same time the agency submits its annual budget justifications to Congress.
( d ) The annual report shall include the following: All alleged violations relating to the agency's covered Federal actions during the year covered by the report, the actions taken by the head of the agency in the year covered by the report with respect to those alleged violations and alleged violations in previous years, and the amounts of civil penalties imposed by the agency in the year covered by the report.
**KFS** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0 1 1 3 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DARRELL DWAYNE SMITH ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30
- day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERE D that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including Ju ly 2 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief
.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 28 2020

05/28/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0113
EXHIBIT 24
                                                 POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned officer and/or director of EMERGING GAMMA CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),  hereby constitutes and appoints Jerry
W.  Jarrell  and  D.B.H.  Chaffe  III,  and each of  them,  with  full  power of
substitution and resubstitution,  as attorney to sign for the undersigned in any
and all capacities the  Corporation's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended March 31, 1998 and any and all amendments thereto, with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission and with full power and authority to do and perform any and
all  acts  and  things  whatsoever  required  and  necessary  to be  done in the
premises,  as fully to all intents and purposes as the  undersigned  could do if
personally  present.  The undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said
attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  or any  of his  substitute  or  substitutes,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof and incorporate such changes as
any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems appropriate.


------------------------------
Burt H. Keenan

May 23, 1998
#### § 1253.210 Military and merchant marine educational institutions.

These Title IX regulations do not apply to an educational institution whose primary purpose is the training of individuals for a military service of the United States or for the merchant marine.
#### § 615.5459 Liability of Farm Credit banks, Funding Corporation and Federal Reserve Banks.

The Farm Credit banks, the Funding Corporation, and the Federal Reserve Banks may rely on the information provided in a transfer message or other transaction documentation, and are not required to verify the information. The Farm Credit banks, the Funding Corporation, and the Federal Reserve Banks shall not be liable for any action taken in accordance with the information set out in the transfer message, other transaction documentation, or evidence submitted in support thereof.
§ 161.411 Comment by interested parties. ( a ) Each aircraft operator requesting a reevaluation shall establish a docket or similar method for receiving and considering comments and shall make comments available for inspection to interested parties specified in paragraph (b) of this section upon request. Comments must be retained for two years.
( b ) Each aircraft operator shall promptly notify interested parties if it makes a substantial change in its analysis that affects either the costs or benefits analyzed, or the criteria in § 161.305, differently from the analysis made available for comment in accordance with § 161.407. Interested parties include those who received direct notice under paragraph (a) of § 161.407 and those who have commented on the reevaluation. If an aircraft operator revises its analysis, it shall make the revised analysis available to an interested party upon request and shall extend the comment period at least 45 days from the date the revised analysis is made available.
#### § 1264.141 Judicial review.

Section 3805 of Title 31, United States Code, authorizes judicial review by an appropriate United States District Court of a final decision of the authority head imposing penalties or assessments under this part and specifies the procedures for such review.
# C_2004262EN.01000503.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 9 September 2004

in Case C-375/02: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Environment - Waste management - Castelliri waste disposal site - Directive 75/442/EEC of 18 March 1991 as amended by Directive 91/156/EEC - Articles 4 and 8)

(2004/C 262/10)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-375/02: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Konstantinidis and R. Amorosi) v Italian Republic (Agent: I.M. Braguglia, assisted by M. Fiorilli) — action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC brought on 18 October 2002 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann, President of Chamber, S. von Bahr and R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 7 September 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | By failing to adopt the measures necessary to ensure that the waste deposited in the Castelliri waste disposal site (Frosinone) (Italy) is recovered or eliminated without endangering human health and without using processes or methods which could harm the environment, and by failing to adopt the measures necessary to ensure that any holder of waste at that site has it handled by a private or public waste collector or by an undertaking which carries out the operations listed in Annex II A or B to Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156 of 18 March 1991, or recovers or disposes of it himself, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 and 8 of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

By failing to adopt the measures necessary to ensure that the waste deposited in the Castelliri waste disposal site (Frosinone) (Italy) is recovered or eliminated without endangering human health and without using processes or methods which could harm the environment, and by failing to adopt the measures necessary to ensure that any holder of waste at that site has it handled by a private or public waste collector or by an undertaking which carries out the operations listed in Annex II A or B to Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156 of 18 March 1991, or recovers or disposes of it himself, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 and 8 of that directive.

| 2. | The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 305 of 7.12.2002.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.500 Acceptance of aircraft engines and propellers. An aircraft engine or propeller manufactured in a foreign country or jurisdiction meets the requirements for acceptance under this subchapter if— ( a ) That country or jurisdiction is subject to the provisions of an agreement with the United States for the acceptance of that product;
( b ) That product is marked in accordance with part 45 of this chapter; and
( c ) The holder or licensee of a U.S. type certificate for that product furnishes with each such aircraft engine or propeller imported into the United States, an export airworthiness approval issued in accordance with the provisions of that agreement certifying that the individual aircraft engine or propeller— ( 1 ) Conforms to its U.S. type certificate and is in condition for safe operation; and
( 2 ) Has been subjected by the manufacturer to a final operational check.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 14

                                 CODE OF ETHICS

<PAGE>

                                 CODE OF ETHICS
            FOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS
                  OF FIRST FEDERAL BANC OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC.

        It is the policy of First Federal Banc of the Southwest, Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as the "Company") that its Chief Executive Officer
("CEO") and its Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") adhere to and advocate the
following principles governing their professional and ethical conduct in the
fulfillment of their responsibilities:

        1.      Act with honesty and integrity, avoiding conflicts between their
personal or private interests and the interests of the Company, including
receiving improper personal benefits as a result of their her position.

        2.      Perform responsibilities with a view to causing periodic reports
and other documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC") to contain information that is accurate, complete, fair and
understandable.

        3.      Use their best efforts to comply with laws of federal, state,
and local governments applicable to the Company, and the rules and regulations
of private and public regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the Company.

        4.      Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, and diligence.

        5.      Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the
course of the performance of their responsibilities, except when authorized or
otherwise legally obligated to disclose it to third parties. Do not use
confidential information acquired in the course of the performance of their
responsibilities for personal advantage.

        6.      Promote ethical behavior among subordinates and peers.

        7.      Use corporate assets and resources employed or entrusted in a
responsible manner.

        8.      Do not use corporate information, corporate assets, corporate
opportunities or their position with the Company for personal gain. Do not
compete directly or indirectly with the Company.

        9.      Comply in all respects with the Company's Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics.

        10.     Advance the Company's legitimate interests when the opportunity
arises.

        It is also the Policy of the Company that the CEO and CFO of the Company
acknowledge and certify to the foregoing annually and file a copy of such
certification with the Audit Committee of the Board of the Directors ("Board")
of the Company.

        The Audit Committee of the Board shall have the power to monitor, make
determinations, and recommend action to the Board with respect to violations of
this Policy.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3935 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3935

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit the burial in 
    Arlington National Cemetery, Virginia, of any President or Vice 
     President who is not a member or veteran of the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2020

 Ms. Duckworth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit the burial in 
    Arlington National Cemetery, Virginia, of any President or Vice 
     President who is not a member or veteran of the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON BURIAL IN ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY, 
              VIRGINIA, OF ANY PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT WHO IS NOT A 
              MEMBER OR VETERAN OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    Section 7722(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3)(A) In carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2), the Secretary of 
Defense shall not approve a determination of eligibility for interment 
or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery made by the Secretary of 
the Army that permits the interment or inurnment in Arlington National 
Cemetery of an individual who is not a member of the armed forces or a 
veteran (as that term is defined in section 101(2) of title 38), but 
served as President of the United States or Vice President of the 
United States.
    ``(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), a President shall not be 
considered a member of the armed forces or a veteran by virtue of 
service under the Constitution as the Commander-in-Chief, and a Vice 
President shall not be considered a member of the armed forces or a 
veteran by virtue of service under the Constitution as Vice 
President.''.
                                 <all>
```