alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐x 

In re:                  PROMESA  

                  Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND  

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

  as representative of   

                  No. 17 BK 3283‐LTS  

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.,                 (Jointly Administered) 

      Debtors.1

  

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐x 

ORDER 

  This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Compel Compliance with February 26, 

2018 Order and for Entry of a Protective Order of Ad Hoc Group of General Obligation 

Bondholders, Ambac Assurance Corporation, Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp., the Mutual 

Fund Group, and National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation (Dkt. No. 2865) (the 

“Motion”).  In accordance with the agreement of the parties to a briefing schedule for the 

Motion, the Court hereby orders as follows: 

1. Any opposition to the Motion shall be filed on or before April 23, 2018. 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the 

last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284‐LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees 

Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3566‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power 

Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) 

(Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

   

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2889 Filed:04/11/18 Entered:04/11/18 17:16:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 

2. Any reply to the Motion shall be filed on or before April 30, 2018. 

3. Oral argument on the Motion will take place on Monday, May 21, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. in 

Boston, Massachusetts.  An order detailing procedures for the hearing will follow. 

SO ORDERED.           

/ s / Judith Gail Dein               

Judith Gail Dein 

              United States Magistrate Judge  

DATED: April 11, 2018 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2889 Filed:04/11/18 Entered:04/11/18 17:16:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2783-6 Filed:03/22/18 Entered:03/22/18 11:39:35 Desc:

Exhibit F Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2783-6 Filed:03/22/18 Entered:03/22/18 11:39:35 Desc:

Exhibit F Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2783-6 Filed:03/22/18 Entered:03/22/18 11:39:35 Desc:

Exhibit F Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2783-6 Filed:03/22/18 Entered:03/22/18 11:39:35 Desc:

Exhibit F Page 4 of 4
§ 125.381 Takeoff and landing weather minimums: IFR. ( a ) Regardless of any clearance from ATC, if the reported weather conditions are less than that specified in the certificate holder's operations specifications, no pilot may— ( 1 ) Take off an airplane under IFR; or
( 2 ) Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, land an airplane under IFR.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, no pilot may execute an instrument approach procedure if the latest reported visibility is less than the landing minimums specified in the certificate holder's operations specifications.
( c ) A pilot who initiates an instrument approach procedure based on a weather report that indicates that the specified visibility minimums exist and subsequently receives another weather report that indicates that conditions are below the minimum requirements, may continue the approach only if either the requirements of § 91.176 of this chapter, or the following conditions are met— ( 1 ) The later weather report is received when the airplane is in one of the following approach phases: ( i ) The airplane is on a ILS approach and has passed the final approach fix;
( ii ) The airplane is on an ASR or PAR final approach and has been turned over to the final approach controller; or
( iii ) The airplane is on a nonprecision final approach and the airplane— ( A ) Has passed the appropriate facility or final approach fix; or
( B ) Where a final approach fix is not specified, has completed the procedure turn and is established inbound toward the airport on the final approach course within the distance prescribed in the procedure; and
( 2 ) The pilot in command finds, on reaching the authorized MDA, or DA/DH, that the actual weather conditions are at or above the minimums prescribed for the procedure being used.
( d ) A pilot may execute an instrument approach procedure, or continue the approach, at an airport when the visibility is reported to be less than the visibility minimums prescribed for that procedure if the pilot uses an operable EFVS in accordance with § 91.176 of this chapter and the certificate holder's operations specifications for EFVS operations, or for a holder of a part 125 letter of deviation authority, a letter of authorization for the use of EFVS.
[Doc. No. 19779, 45 FR 67235, Oct. 9, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 125-2, 46 FR 24409, Apr. 30, 1981; Amdt. 125-45, 69 FR 1641, Jan. 9, 2004; Amdt. 125-52, 72 FR 31683, June 7, 2007; Docket FAA-2013-0485, Amdt. 125-66, 81 FR 90177, Dec. 13, 2016]
EXHIBIT 10.12


                          RECOM MANAGED SYSTEMS, INC.
          4705 Laurel Canyon Blvd, Second Floor, Studio City, CA 91607
                  Phone 818-505-1288     Facsimile 818-762-9100




March 10, 2002



Chuck McGill
7267 Monte Vista Ave.
San Diego, CA  92037

Subject:  Employment with Recom Managed Systems, Inc.

Dear Mr. McGill:

It is our pleasure to extend you an offer of employment with Recom Managed
Systems, Inc. (OTC-BB RECM) with a start date of March 20, 2003. Your position
will be as Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer which is
considered a professional position and reports directly to the CEO/President.
Although the company headquarters are located in Studio City, you will be
based out of San Diego at a location acceptable to you and the CEO.

Your gross salary will be $.50 semi-monthly based on an annual salary of
$12.00.  You will be paid biweekly according to the pay period schedule you
will receive with your orientation information.  In addition to your gross
salary, you shall be granted options to purchase 300,000 shares of the
company's common stock.  The options shall vest quarterly over a 3 year period
and have a strike price of $2.28 per share.  Additionally, in the event your
employment is terminated by the company for any reason other than cause,
option vesting shall be accelerated to provide for two additional quarters of
vesting.

As a salaried employee you will be eligible for paid vacations and holidays,
paid sick time, and if established, our group health, dental, and life
insurance plans and 401K Plan in accordance with the respective company
policies.  In the event the company does not currently have a group health
plan in place or if you determine the group health plan inadequate for your
needs, the company will reimburse your monthly medical expenses.  In addition
the company agrees to reimburse you for your automobile expense.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, you understand that your total reimbursement
for medical and automobile expense shall not exceed $2,000.00 per month.
Additional information about this and all other company benefits will be
provided to you with your orientation materials.

By your acceptance of our offer of employment you are also agreeing to the
terms and conditions contained in our Employment Agreement and Employment,
Confidential Information, Invention Assignment, and Arbitration Agreement
included with this letter.  This offer will expire on March 28, 2003.  Please
indicate your acceptance by signing and returning one copy of each document.






Page 1 of 2


We are pleased to have you joining Recom Managed Systems, Inc. and look
forward to a long and mutually rewarding relationship.

Sincerely,


/s/ Marvin Fink, CEO
Recom Managed Systems, Inc.

                                    /s/ Chuck McGill 3/25/03



Page 2 of 2
#### § 27.1565 Tail rotor.

Each tail rotor must be marked so that its disc is conspicuous under normal daylight ground conditions.

[Amdt. 27-2, 33 FR 965, Jan. 26, 1968]
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1042 PLATE 50
ect 83°07'30" 83°00!
r 37°37'30" 37°37'30"
t— 650
8000 Feet
L— 600 ! Te]
L- 550 |
F—- 500
i Sy
, yt x? Fov
L- 450
L— 400
F— 350
r- 300
t— 250
| 37°30" 37°30!
83°07'30" 83°00"
Base from U. S, Geological Survey map of
|. 200 “Tiptop quadrangle, 1961
| INDEX MAP OF MEASURED SECTIONS WHICH ARE FIXED BY NUMBERS,
COMPASS DIRECTIONS, AND REFERENCE TO STREAMS
5 ' 1 9 2 Miles
, 0 {en i ! |
t— 150
agoffin beds of Morse | EXPLANATION FOR STRATIGRAPHIC SECTION .
i. spar oh re | AND INDEX MAP
10
+— 100 H
| Sandstone Coal
L FESSSsa
| Limestone
— 50 <crL> Measured section or core hale
=xcE> Number refers to location
Shale Limestone concretions on index mep
cr °
foe, Ke om a Corcinelel
Dashed where extent of coal 1s unknown. x
Lo Calcareaus shale Query indicates a doubtful correlation Measured section

GENERAL STRATIGRAPHIC SECTION OF COAL BEDS IN THE TIPTOP QUADRANGLE, KENTUCKY, FROM PEACH ORCHARD BRANCH ON THE WEST-CENTRAL BORDER
TO GOUGE BRANCH IN THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER set 0 8 (a pst
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.5

                          THIRD AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS OF
                           COSINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation

THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT TO THE BYLAWS OF COSINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., A DELAWARE
CORPORATION, WAS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON FEBRUARY, 2004:

         ARTICLE 3.2

         Article 3.2 was amended to read in its entirety as follows:


         3.2      NUMBER OF DIRECTORS

                  The authorized number of directors shall be four (4). This
         number may be changed by a duly adopted resolution of the board of
         directors.

                  No reduction of the authorized number of directors shall have
         the effect of removing any director before that director's term of
         office expires.

                  A class of directors shall be elected at each annual meeting
         of stockholders as provided in Section 3.3 of these bylaws. Each
         director, including a director elected to fill a vacancy, shall hold
         office until the earlier of their death, resignation or expiration of
         the term for which elected and until a successor has been elected and
         qualified.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR I O R E NE R UB I O, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. C . M. HA R R I S ON , R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 55467 D. C . No . 2 : 0 5 - c v - 0 8 6 9 1 - OD W ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia O t i s D . W r i ghtI I , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J ul y19, 2010 ** B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , R E IN H A R D T , an d W A R D L A W , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner M ar i o R ene R ub i o app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve 

# FI LED AU G 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSW e c e rt i f y f orappe a l , on ourow n m ot i on, the i s s ue of w he the rthe 2003 1 pr i s on di s c i pl i nary de c i s i on a s s e s s i ng 150 da y s l os s of good t i m e w ork c r e di t s a nd 9 0 d a y s lo s s o f

p r iv ile g e s v io la te d d u e p r o c e s s . 08- 55467 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 2253, a nd w e r e ve r s e a nd r e m a nd. 1 R ubi o c ont e nds tha tthe pr i s on di s c i pl i na ryde c i s i on, f i ndi ng hi m gui l tyof i nde c e nte xpos ur e w i th apr i orc ourtc onvi c t i on unde rC a l i f orni aP e na l C ode se ct i on s 314 or 28 8, w as no tsupp ort ed by “ som e e vi dence” and there fore vi ol at ed hi s due pr oc e s s r i ght s . W e r e m a nd f orthe di s tr i c tc ourtt o de t e rm i ne w he the ra ny of R ub i o’ s pri or courtconv i ct i on s qual i fyas conv i ct i on s und erC al i forni a P enal C ode s e c t i ons 314 or288, a nd i f s o, w he the rs om e e vi de nc e s upport s the he a r i ng o f f ic e r ’s f in d in g . Se e Su

p e r in te n de n t v . Hill , 47 2 U . S . 44 5, 45 4 (19 85 ). RE V E RS E D A ND RE MAND E D.Ju d g e R ei n h ard td i ssen t s. 

# FI LED AU G 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 05, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 05, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24I0092. HUBERT HICKSON v. NETPLANNER SYSTEMS, INC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

SUCV2022000087
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2820-1 Filed:03/28/18 Entered:03/28/18 14:55:15 Desc:Exhibit CERTIFICATION Page 1 of 1
§ 25.1357 Circuit protective devices. ( a ) Automatic protective devices must be used to minimize distress to the electrical system and hazard to the airplane in the event of wiring faults or serious malfunction of the system or connected equipment.
( b ) The protective and control devices in the generating system must be designed to de-energize and disconnect faulty power sources and power transmission equipment from their associated busses with sufficient rapidity to provide protection from hazardous over-voltage and other malfunctioning.
( c ) Each resettable circuit protective device must be designed so that, when an overload or circuit fault exists, it will open the circuit irrespective of the position of the operating control.
( d ) If the ability to reset a circuit breaker or replace a fuse is essential to safety in flight, that circuit breaker or fuse must be located and identified so that it can be readily reset or replaced in flight. Where fuses are used, there must be spare fuses for use in flight equal to at least 50% of the number of fuses of each rating required for complete circuit protection.
( e ) Each circuit for essential loads must have individual circuit protection. However, individual protection for each circuit in an essential load system (such as each position light circuit in a system) is not required.
( f ) For airplane systems for which the ability to remove or reset power during normal operations is necessary, the system must be designed so that circuit breakers are not the primary means to remove or reset system power unless specifically designed for use as a switch.
( g ) Automatic reset circuit breakers may be used as integral protectors for electrical equipment (such as thermal cut-outs) if there is circuit protection to protect the cable to the equipment.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-123, 72 FR 63405, Nov. 8, 2007]
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0050

SAT Date: 11/6/2012

Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 12

2

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

P2Rec Comments:

Comment: No Comment

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

IRR/POSS CORR-E,S,L,MM

LUNG

LIVER

UNCERT SENS-S,L

AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0050-51
FATE: Estimations for 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 5.24 (E) 

S = Dispersible / 1.20 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.40 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.75 (E)

log Fish BAF = 3.02 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lung, based on analogs. There are concerns for severe 

irritation/possible corrosion to all exposed tissues, and for cationic binding to lung membranes, 

based on the of the PMN substance. There also is concern for liver 

toxicity and uncertain concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization, based on 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 1.1 aliphatic amine SAR

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.18 aliphatic amine SAR

green algal 96-h EC50 0.069 amide SAR

fish _ chronic value 0.010 amide SAR

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.020 aliphatic amine SAR

algal _ chronic 

value

0.034 aliphatic amine SAR

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for aliphatic amines and amides; 

SAR chemical class = aliphatic amine, amide; ; liquid; log Kow = 4.68 (EPI); S = 

dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1 amide SAR

SARs aliphatic amines and amides

SAR Class aliphatic amine, amide

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
```

[Federal Register: May 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 98)]
[Notices]               
[Page 28673]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21my10-153]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7021]

 
Bureau of Verification, Compliance, and Implementation; 
Termination of Measures Against a Russian Entity

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A determination has been made to terminate sanctions imposed 
on Rosoboronexport (ROE) pursuant to Section 3 of the Iran, North 
Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act.

DATES: Effective Date: May 21, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: On general issues: Stephen J. Tomchik, 
Bureau of Verification, Compliance, and Implementation, Department of 
State, Telephone (202) 647-1192. For U.S. Government procurement ban 
issues: Kimberly Triplett, Office of the Procurement Executive, 
Department of State, Telephone: (703) 875-4079.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 4 of the Iran, North 
Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act (Pub. L. 106-178), the U.S. 
Government determined on May 12, 2010 that sanctions imposed effective 
October 23, 2008 (73 FR 206) on the Russian entity Rosoboronexport 
(ROE) are terminated.

    Dated: May 12, 2010.
Rose E. Gottemoeller,
Assistant Secretary of State for Verification, Compliance, and 
Implementation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-12304 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
```
§ 158.24 Notice and opportunity for public comment. ( a ) ( 1 ) *Notice by public agency.* A public agency must provide written notice and an opportunity for public comment before: ( i ) Filing an application with the FAA for authority to impose a PFC under § 158.25(b);
( ii ) Filing an application with the FAA for authority to use PFC revenue under § 158.25(c);
( iii ) Filing a notice of intent to impose and/or use a PFC under § 158.30; and
( iv ) Filing a request to amend a previously approved PFC as discussed in § 158.37(b)(1).
( 2 ) The notice must allow the public to file comments for at least 30 days, but no more than 45 days, after the date of publication of the notice or posting on the public agency's Web site, as applicable.
( b ) ( 1 ) *Notice contents.* The notice required by § 158.24(a) must include: ( i ) A description of the project(s) the public agency is considering for funding by PFC's;
( ii ) A brief justification for each project the public agency is considering for funding by PFC's;
( iii ) The PFC level for each project;
( iv ) The estimated total PFC revenue the public agency will use for each project;
( v ) The proposed charge effective date for the application or notice of intent;
( vi ) The estimated charge expiration date for the application or notice of intent;
( vii ) The estimated total PFC revenue the public agency will collect for the application or notice of intent; and
( viii ) The name of and contact information for the person within the public agency to whom comments should be sent.
( 2 ) The public agency must make available a more detailed project justification or the justification documents to the public upon request.
( c ) *Distribution of notice.* The public agency must make the notice available to the public and interested agencies through one or more of the following methods: ( 1 ) Publication in local newspapers of general circulation;
( 2 ) Publication in other local media;
( 3 ) Posting the notice on the public agency's Internet Web site; or
( 4 ) Any other method acceptable to the Administrator.
[Doc. No. FAA-2004-17999, 70 FR 14934, Mar. 23, 2005]