alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kopan v. Hawk

*Cyril T. Garvey,*for plaintiffs.

*Albert E. Acker,*for defendant.

*714April 28, 1958.

McKay, J.,

In this case defendant has filed preliminary objections asking for a more specific complaint as to averments of the injuries to the respective plaintiffs. The several objections raised essentially the same question, viz., whether after specifying injuries in detail plaintiff may properly add “other injuries both internal and external in and about the head, limbs and body.” Defendant objects that this language is so general that defendant is not apprised thereby of what he will be called upon to meet at the trial.

Plaintiff contends that the question is ruled by the case of Toussaint v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co., 67 D. & C. 387 (1949). In that case the complaint set forth the injuries received specifically and added, “and divers other injuries”. The court dismissed the preliminary objections asking for a more specific complaint, stating, page 388: “We believe a plaintiff is entitled to a catchall after specifying the main items of damage.”

We disagree with the court’s conclusion in the Toussaint case. A catchall averment of “other injuries” is nothing more than a generalized averment under which any injuries whatever could be proved at the trial. Defendant would have no knowledge in advance of the trial of what they are.

The case is similar to that of Grumley v. Pellegrino, 4 D. *&*C. 205 (1903), in which an averment of “other and various injuries to different parts of his body” was held not sufficiently specific.

*Order*

Now, April 28,1958, the preliminary objections filed by defendant in the above entitled case asking for a more specific pleading with respect to paragraphs 8, 15,18, 21 and 23 of the complaint are sustained.
p.1 

OAR Box 1252 

Prepped by Candice Davis 

Document Number: 

67) ll-A-1 

Docket Number: 

A-90-22 

Printed 5/21/2008 11:46:01 AM Sheet 67 of 184 
P.2 

f/EPA 

United States 

Environmental Protection 

Agency 

Office of Air Quality 

Planning and Standards 

Research Triangle Park NC 27711 

-V_,a_s: ' -81 

Air 

Bulk Gasoline 

TerminalsBackground 

Information for 

Promulgated 

Standards 

Final 

EIS B.-2443 

A-90-22 

ll-A-1 

RADIAN LIBRARY 

DURHAM, N. C. 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

:c

__ 
P.3 

This report has been reviewed by the Emission Standards and Engineering Division of the Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, EPA, and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial 

products is not intended to constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Copies of this report are 

available through the Library Services Office (MD-35), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research 

Triangle Park, NC. 27711, or from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, 

Springfield, Virginia 22161. 

Publication No. EPA-450/3-80-038b 

I J 
P.4 

NOTES FOR TABLES 8-1 AND 8-2 

Carbon Adsorption Unit. 

Thermal Oxidation Unit. 

'Refrigeration Unit. 

Includes one performance test plus $5,000 equipment cost. 

'Cost of installing vapor collection equipment on existing bottom 

loading tank trucks, $3,000 per truck. 

Cost of converting top loading racks to bottom loading and vapor 

recovery, $200,000 per rack. 

^Cost of retrofitting existing top loading tank trucks with bottom 

loading and vapor collection equipment, $6,400 per tank truck. 

h Electricit y costs are based on average consumption rates reported by 

manufacturers. 

Propane for pilo t burner estimated at 12.5 liter s per hour, at $0.18 per 

liter . 

^Estimated activated carbon replacement period is 10 years, at $3.85 per 

kilogram carbon cost. 

k 

Estimated as 4 percent of unit purchase cost, plus annual rack vapor 

collection maintenance of $200 per rack and $200 per terminal. 

Daily system inspections at 1 hour per day, plus a monthly inspection 

for liquid and vapor leaks in the vapor collection and processing 

systems. 

Includes capital charges on continuous monitor investment plus 

$2,500 annual operating cost. 

nCost to perform.annual vapor tightness testing, including one-half 

day downtime, $300 per truck. 

^Total capital investment (less monitor) x (capital recovery factor + 

0.04), where interest rate = 17 percent, equipment economic lif e = 

10 years. 

B-5
FELLOWSHIP NO



## . UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

## EPA FELLOWSHIP 

# ACTIVATION NOTICE (Please type or print clearly) DATE FELLOW WILL ENTER ON DUTY
NOTICE: EPA provides any payments to the sponsoring institution by check and provides any payments to the fellow either electronically or by check as determined appropriate by EPA. NAME OF FELLOW NAME OF SPONSORING INSTITUTION

MAILING ADDRESS FOR PAYMENTS TO FELLOW (include ZIP code) MAILING ADDRESS FOR PAYMENTS TO INSTITUTION (include ZIP code)



## FOR EPA USE ONLY STIPEND AWARD PERIOD MONTHLY $ FROM THROUGH
TOTAL $ BOOK ALLOWANCE $ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS

TUITION & FEES $ LEVEL Agency Special
TOTAL AWARD $ PREPARED BY DATE
REMARKS

SPECIALIST FOR PROJECT AREA CODE TELEPHONE NO.

SIGNATURE OF FELLOW AREA CODE TELEPHONE NO. DATE
APPROVING SIGNATURES SPONSOR OR DEPARTMENT HEAD (Please indicate) AREA CODE TELEPHONE NO. DATE

EPA Form 5770-7 (6-73) Replaces FWPCA Form 188 which is obsolete, and PHS Form 416-5 which will not be used. OMB Control No. 20 30

- 0020 Approval expires 04 / 30 / 2012

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

As representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO

Debtor.

BANKRUPTCY NO.: 17-03283 (LTS)

PROMESA

Title III

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICE

TO THE HONORABLE BANKRUPTCY COURT:

COMES NOW creditor Sistema de Retiro de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, through 

the undersigned counsel, and respectfully states and prays as follows:

The undersigned counsel appears pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9010(b) and requests that 

copies of all future notices, pleadings, and other filings in the case be served on him. The 

undersigned also requests to be added to the Master List maintained by the Clerk of the Court.

WHEREFORE, the appearing party requests from this Honorable Court to take notice of 

the above stated, to serve it accordingly and to include it in the master address list.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 12th day of June, 2017.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:312 Filed:06/12/17 Entered:06/12/17 16:45:42 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send electronic notification of such filing 

to all counsel of record.

 ANTONETTI MONTALVO & RAMIREZ COLL

P.O. Box 13128

San Juan, PR 00908

Tel: (787) 977-0303

Fax: (787) 977-0323

s/ Jose L. Ramirez-Coll

JOSE L. RAMIREZ-COLL

USDC-PR No. 221702

jramirez@amrclaw.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:312 Filed:06/12/17 Entered:06/12/17 16:45:42 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              7
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       627,607
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              0
<EQUITIES>                                  22,030
<MORTGAGE>                                       0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             672,214
<CASH>                                      12,365
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           4,578
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      28,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,049,793
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            519,402
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                        166,027
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             32,100
<COMMON>                                       147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 254,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,049,793
<PREMIUMS>                                 194,769
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         26,024
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           1,084
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  46
<BENEFITS>                                 117,687
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 42,172
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        20,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             39,999
<INCOME-TAX>                                11,453
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         28,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                28,546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.99
<RESERVE-OPEN>                             367,436
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                        193,709
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                           53,679
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          10,481
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            76,547
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                            519,402
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      8,394
        



</TABLE>
§ 23.2320 Occupant physical environment. ( a ) The applicant must design the airplane to— ( 1 ) Allow clear communication between the flightcrew and passengers;
( 2 ) Protect the pilot and flight controls from propellers; and
( 3 ) Protect the occupants from serious injury due to damage to windshields, windows, and canopies.
( b ) For level 4 airplanes, each windshield and its supporting structure directly in front of the pilot must withstand, without penetration, the impact equivalent to a two-pound bird when the velocity of the airplane is equal to the airplane's maximum approach flap speed.
( c ) The airplane must provide each occupant with air at a breathable pressure, free of hazardous concentrations of gases, vapors, and smoke during normal operations and likely failures.
( d ) If a pressurization system is installed in the airplane, it must be designed to protect against— ( 1 ) Decompression to an unsafe level; and
( 2 ) Excessive differential pressure.
( e ) If an oxygen system is installed in the airplane, it must— ( 1 ) Effectively provide oxygen to each user to prevent the effects of hypoxia; and
( 2 ) Be free from hazards in itself, in its method of operation, and its effect upon other components.
#### § 152.609 Energy conservation practices.

Each sponsor shall require fuel and energy conservation practices in the operation and maintenance of the airport and shall encourage airport tenants to use these practices.
§ 161.405 Request for reevaluation. ( a ) A request for reevaluation submitted to the FAA by an aircraft operator must include the following information: ( 1 ) The name of the airport and associated cities and states;
( 2 ) A clear, concise description of the restriction and any sanctions for noncompliance, whether the restriction was approved by the FAA or agreed to by the airport operator and aircraft operators, the date of the approval or agreement, and a copy of the restriction as incorporated in a local ordinance, airport rule, lease, or other document;
( 3 ) The quantified change in the noise environment using methodology specified in this part;
( 4 ) Evidence of the relationship between this change and the likelihood that the restriction does not meet one or more of the conditions in § 161.305;
( 5 ) The aircraft operator's status under the restriction (e.g., currently affected operator, potential new entrant) and an explanation of the aircraft operator's specific objection; and
( 6 ) A description and evidence of the aircraft operator's attempt to resolve the dispute locally with the affected parties, including the airport operator.
( b ) The FAA will evaluate the aircraft operator's submission and determine whether or not a reevaluation is justified. The FAA may request additional information from the airport operator or any other party and may convene an informal meeting to gather facts relevant to its determination.
( c ) The FAA will notify the aircraft operator in writing, with a copy to the affected airport operator, of its determination. ( 1 ) If the FAA determines that a reevaluation is not justified, it will indicate the reasons for this decision.
( 2 ) If the FAA determines that a reevaluation is justified, the aircraft operator will be notified to complete its analysis and to begin the public notice procedure, as set forth in this subpart.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quicksilver Resources Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Philip W. Cook, Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Glenn Darden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, each certifies that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 1, 2006



|                                              |  |                                      
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|By:    /s/ Philip W.
Cook                     |  | By:    /s/ Glenn
Darden              
|Philip W. Cook                                |  | Glenn Darden                         
|Senior Vice President-Chief Financial Officer |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.40  


 
 

AMENDMENT
  TO THE
  1997 EQUITY PARTICIPATION PLAN
  OF
  GUITAR CENTER, INC.    
    


        Pursuant to the authority reserved to the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Guitar Center, Inc., a
corporation organized under the laws of State of Delaware, under Section 10.2 of the 1997 Equity Participation Plan of Guitar Center, Inc. (as amended, the
"Plan"), the Board hereby further amends the Plan as follows. 



	1.
	The
second sentence of Section 2.1(a) of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 




        "The
aggregate number of such shares which may be issued upon exercise of such options or rights or upon any such awards under the Plan shall not exceed four million (4,000,000)." 


	2.
	This
amendment shall be submitted for approval at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company scheduled to be held on April 30, 2003, or any postponement or adjournment
thereof. 



*
* * * * * * * * * 


        I
hereby certify that the foregoing amendment to the Plan was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Guitar Center, Inc., effective as of March 24, 2003. 



	 	 	/s/  BRUCE L. ROSS      
 Bruce L. Ross

Secretary	 	 











QuickLinks


AMENDMENT TO THE 1997 EQUITY PARTICIPATION PLAN OF GUITAR CENTER, INC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>






<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                              0000797917
<NAME>                             RAYTECH CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                         U.S. DOLLARS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       APR-02-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    1

<CASH>                             10,086
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      38,245
<ALLOWANCES>                       1,380
<INVENTORY>                        33,644
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   87,565
<PP&E>                             182,480
<DEPRECIATION>                     100,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     192,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              72,678
<BONDS>                            0
<COMMON>                           5,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                         79,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       192,124
<SALES>                            67,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   67,475
<CGS>                              49,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      49,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    9,106
<INCOME-TAX>                       3,825
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                4,820
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       4,820
<EPS-BASIC>                      1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                      1.36





</TABLE>
§ 105.43 Use of single-harness, dual-parachute systems. No person may conduct a parachute operation using a single-harness, dual-parachute system, and no pilot in command of an aircraft may allow any person to conduct a parachute operation from that aircraft using a single-harness, dual-parachute system, unless that system has at least one main parachute, one approved reserve parachute, and one approved single person harness and container that are packed as follows: ( a ) The main parachute must have been packed within 180 days before the date of its use by a certificated parachute rigger, the person making the next jump with that parachute, or a non-certificated person under the direct supervision of a certificated parachute rigger.
( b ) The reserve parachute must have been packed by a certificated parachute rigger— ( 1 ) Within 180 days before the date of its use, if its canopy, shroud, and harness are composed exclusively of nylon, rayon, or similar synthetic fiber or material that is substantially resistant to damage from mold, mildew, and other fungi, and other rotting agents propagated in a moist environment; or
( 2 ) Within 60 days before the date of its use, if it is composed of any amount of silk, pongee, or other natural fiber, or material not specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( c ) If installed, the automatic activation device must be maintained in accordance with manufacturer instructions for that automatic activation device.
[Doc. No. FAA-1999-5483, 66 FR 23553, May 9, 2001, as amended by Amdt. 105-13, 73 FR 69531, Nov. 19, 2008]
§ 253.8 Qualifications to notice requirements. ( a ) If notice is not provided in accordance with § 253.5 at a ticket sales location outside of the United States that is not a U.S. air carrier ticket office, the price paid for the portion of such ticket that is for interstate and overseas air transportation shall be refundable without penalty if the passenger refuses transportation by the carrier. Each air carrier shall ensure that passengers who have bought tickets at those locations without the notice required in § 253.5 are given that notice not later than check-in for the travel in interstate or overseas air transportation, and that conspicuous notice is included on or with the ticket stating that the price for that travel is refundable without penalty.
( b ) An air taxi operator (including a commuter air carrier) not operating under subpart I of part 298 of this chapter shall not be considered to have incorporated terms by reference into its contract of carriage merely because a passenger has purchased a flight segment on that carrier that appears on ticket stock that contains a statement that terms have been incorporated by reference. However, such an air taxi operator may not claim the benefit as against the passenger of, and the passenger shall not be bound by, any contract term incorporated by reference if notice of the term has not been provided to the passenger in accordance with this part.
[ER-1370, 48 FR 54591, Dec. 6, 1983]
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-16-00438-CV

In the Interest of K.B. and K.R.B., Children

(No. 2014-513,337 IN 72ND DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Motion fee

Motion fee

Reporter's record

Filing

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Statewide efiling fee

$10.00

$10.00

$560.00

$100.00

$25.00

$50.00

$30.00

EXEMPT

INDIGENT

UNKNOWN

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

Martha Garcia

Jim Shaw

Lubbock County

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause,

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Seventh District of Texas on August 3,

2017.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Scale, in feet

°

bi

10

20
North

5

NEYSW%

Sec. 5; 25iS., "Ri 25/E.

0/ 900epm

4

SWASW
Sec. 7, T. 25S., R. 25 E.

°

Lithologic symbols

Sand

Es)

Orgenic material

tron cementation or
staining; “hardpan”

Clay

Phosphate nodules

Calcareous clay
Limestone

No recovery, core lost

A mixture of symbols indicates
a mixed lithology

3
NWUNE'
Sec. 32, T. 255., R. 25 E.

EXPLANATION
Other symbols
Lithologic correlation
Stratigraphic correlation
Limits of aluminum and

calcium phosphate zones

three ofthe above correlations
follow the same line

r{
Section of core from which fossils were
identified
20

Sample number and interval samples
from lot 2547

2,
NWYNWY,
Sec, 21, T. 265., R. 25.

© 900 1800 cpm
—]

Surfoce®_200 ¢Pm

Trace of gamma-ray log showing
intensity of radiation; cpm=
counts per minute

la

‘SWYSW
Sec. 21, T. 26S., R. 25 E.

0/ 900 cpm

CROSS SECTION 16, LAND-PEBBLE PHOSPHATE DISTRICT, FLORIDA

BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 31

South

Sec. 28, T. 26S., R. 25 E.

© 900cpm

PLEISTOCENE
Terrace sand

Elevation, in feet

{ee

+ 160

PLIOCENE
Bone Valley formation

}- 140

}- 120

+ 100

MIDDLE MIOCENE
Hawthorn formation

EOCENE
Ocala limestone

+- 80

|. 60

iL. 40

466352 O - 59 (In pocket)