alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Corey E. Shaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/  Corey E. Shaker
-------------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 13, 2002
Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups

 Exhibit 4.6

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Statements on Schedule 13D

      The
  undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Brian Reilly as the undersigned’s
  true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution
  and resubstitution, to sign on the undersigned’s behalf any or all Statements
  on Schedule 13D, and any or all amendments thereto, or any other documents whatsover,
  relating to the common stock of Masisa S.A., and to file the same, with all
  exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
  said attorney-in-fact or agent, full power and authority to do and perform each
  and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
  promises, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact or
  agent, or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

      Dated as of 4 April 2003.  

	 	/s/ Christian Verling
	 	

	 	Christian Verling
#### § 235.2 Applicability.

This part applies to the scheduled domestic and international passenger service of any U.S. air carrier that operates such service with at least one aircraft having a designed seating capacity of more than 60 passenger seats. The reporting requirements of this part apply to all scheduled-service passenger flights of such carriers, including flights that are operated with aircraft having 60 or fewer seats.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATIONS EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,118,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,957,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,486,145
<INVENTORY>                                    164,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,459,248
<PP&E>                                       2,369,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                 847,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,972,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,133,327
<BONDS>                                        389,760
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       723,556
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,200,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,972,663
<SALES>                                      2,628,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,357,785
<CGS>                                          247,832
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,537,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               365,418
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                820,730
<INCOME-TAX>                                   284,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            536,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   536,730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
**Title:**Beryllium content of volcanic  rocks
SuDoc Number: I 19.3:1214-C
Item  Number: 0620 (online)
CGP System  Number:000974021

Report 
Plate 1  | Plate  2 | Plate  3 | Plate  4 | Plate  5| Plate  6 | Plate  7
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Publishing Office.

 

Last updated:  September 15,  2017  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
  |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.62 Explosives and other dangerous or restricted articles.

Carriers may publish rules and regulations governing the transportation of explosives and other dangerous or restricted articles in separate governing tariffs, conforming to this subpart, instead of being included in the fares tariffs or in the governing rules tariff authorized by § 221.61. This separate governing tariff shall contain no other rules or governing provisions.
§ 1252.102 To what programs or activities do these regulations apply? ( a ) These regulations apply to each NASA recipient and to each program or activity operated by the recipient which receives Federal financial assistance provided by NASA.
( b ) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 does not apply to: ( 1 ) An age distinction contained in that part of a Federal, State, or local statute or ordinance adopted by an elected body which: ( i ) Provides any benefits or assistance to persons based on age; or
( ii ) Establishes criteria for participation in age-related terms; or
( iii ) Describes intended beneficiaries or target groups in age-related terms.
( 2 ) Any employment practice of any employer, employment agency, labor organization, or any labor-management joint apprenticeship training program, except for any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance for public service employment under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1974 (CETA) (29 U.S.C. 801 *et seq.*).
[50 FR 13311, Apr. 4, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51352, Aug. 26, 2003]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

and
the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost Plus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Barry J. Feld, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Jane L. Baughman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Barry J. Feld                                                                                         
|Barry J. Feld Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)                            
|                                                                                                             
|December 8, 2009                                                                                             
|                                                                                                             
|/s/    Jane L. Baughman                                                                                      
|Jane L. Baughman Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)
|                                                                                                             
|December 8, 2009
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6642** 

CASEY RAFAEL TYLER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

OLIVER WASHINGTON , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 5:14

- ct

- 03126

- H )

Submitted : July 21, 2015 Decided: July 24, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Casey Rafael Tyler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Casey Rafael Tyler appeals the district court ’ s order denying
as moot his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Tyler v. Washington , No. 5:14

- ct

- 03126

- H (E.D.N.C. Apr.
21, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40906 Summary Calendar

PAUL ALLEN BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus STACY KIMBERLIN; ANTHONY FREEMAN; DENNIS HENDRICKS; FRANK CRIPPEN; GEORGE FONG; RICHARD SEWARD, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:06-CV-96

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Paul Allen Brown, Texas prisoner # 1135724, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel. Brown has failed to brief the issue of his entitlement to counsel and has therefore waived the only issue before this court. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
§ 145.5 Certificate and operations specifications requirements. ( a ) No person may operate as a certificated repair station without, or in violation of, a repair station certificate, ratings, or operations specifications issued under this part.
( b ) The certificate and operations specifications issued to a certificated repair station must be available on the premises for inspection by the public and the FAA.
§ 29.1013 Oil tanks. ( a ) *Installation.* Each oil tank installation must meet the requirements of § 29.967.
( b ) *Expansion space.* Oil tank expansion space must be provided so that— ( 1 ) Each oil tank used with a reciprocating engine has an expansion space of not less than the greater of 10 percent of the tank capacity or 0.5 gallon, and each oil tank used with a turbine engine has an expansion space of not less than 10 percent of the tank capacity;
( 2 ) Each reserve oil tank not directly connected to any engine has an expansion space of not less than two percent of the tank capacity; and
( 3 ) It is impossible to fill the expansion space inadvertently with the rotorcraft in the normal ground attitude.
( c ) *Filler connections.* Each recessed oil tank filler connection that can retain any appreciable quantity of oil must have a drain that discharges clear of the entire rotorcraft. In addition— ( 1 ) Each oil tank filler cap must provide an oil-tight seal under the pressure expected in operation;
( 2 ) For category A rotorcraft, each oil tank filler cap or filler cap cover must incorporate features that provide a warning when caps are not fully locked or seated on the filler connection; and
( 3 ) Each oil filler must be marked under § 29.1557(c)(2).
( d ) *Vent.* Oil tanks must be vented as follows: ( 1 ) Each oil tank must be vented from the top part of the expansion space to that venting is effective under all normal flight conditions.
( 2 ) Oil tank vents must be arranged so that condensed water vapor that might freeze and obstruct the line cannot accumulate at any point;
( e ) *Outlet.* There must be means to prevent entrance into the tank itself, or into the tank outlet, of any object that might obstruct the flow of oil through the system. No oil tank outlet may be enclosed by a screen or guard that would reduce the flow of oil below a safe value at any operating temperature. There must be a shutoff valve at the outlet of each oil tank used with a turbine engine unless the external portion of the oil system (including oil tank supports) is fireproof.
( f ) *Flexible liners.* Each flexible oil tank liner must be approved or shown to be suitable for the particular installation.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-10, 39 FR 35462, Oct. 1, 1974]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of aQuantive, Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Form 10-Q***”), I, Brian P. McAndrews, the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Form 10-Q fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: May 7, 2004
#### § 811.6 Registered bonds and notes.

Registered Federal Financing Bank securities deposited with a Reserve Bank for any purpose specified in § 811.2 shall be assigned for conversion to book-entry Federal Financing Bank securities. The assignment, which shall be executed in accordance with the provisions of subpart F of 31 CFR, part 306, so far as applicable, shall be to—

Federal Reserve Bank of ____________, as fiscal agent of the United States acting on behalf of the Federal Financing Bank for conversion to book-entry Federal Financing Bank securities.
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.190 Time for filing and computation of time periods. ( a ) A tariff, or revision thereto, or a special tariff permission application may be electronically filed with the Department immediately upon compliance with § 221.180, and anytime thereafter, subject to § 221.400. The actual date and time of filing shall be noted with each filing.
( b ) For the purpose of determining the date that a tariff, or revision thereto, filed pursuant to this subpart, shall be deemed received by the Department: ( 1 ) For all electronic tariffs, or revisions thereto, filed before 5:30 p.m. local time in Washington, DC, on Federal business days, such date shall be the actual date of filing.
( 2 ) For all electronic tariffs, or revisions thereto, filed after 5:30 p.m. local time in Washington, DC, on Federal business days, and for all electronic tariffs, or revisions thereto, filed on days that are not Federal business days, such date shall be the next Federal business day.
# Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures Proposed Rulemaking: Public Meeting and Webinar624556617 Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) Sep 27, 2013 08:31 AM EDT 417 Total Attended 22 

# Session Details

First Name Last Name Email CountryAddress City StateOrganization Zip Code Jeevon Baird jbaird@adlt.com US 32000 Aurora Rd. Solon OHVenture Lighting 44139 natasha collins natasha.collins@pnnl.gov US 620 SW 5th Ave Portland OR PNNL 97229 Michael Droesch michael.droesch@navigant.comUS 77 s bedford st burlington MA Navigant 01803 Doug Elliott douglas.elliott@pnnl.gov US 620 SW 5th Ave., Suite 810Portland OR PNNL 97204 David Errigo derrigo@lumenoptix.com US 203 Progress Dr MontgomeryvillePA LumenOptix 18936 Jack Graul jack.graul@ee.doe.gov US 950 L Enfant WashingtonDC DOE 20024 joe hancock joe.hancock@fpl.com US 12350 184 ct n jupiter FL Florida Power & Light 33478 john hodges jhodges@wileyrein.com US 1776 k street nw washigton DCwiley rein 20006 Donna Hostick donna.hostick@pnnl.gov US PO Box 999, MS K6-05 Richland WAPacific Northwest National Laboratory 99352 Ed Klonowski eklonowski@unvlt.com US 26 Century Blvd., Suite 500Nashville TN Universal Lighting 37214 Robert Lingard robert.lingard@pnnl.gov US 620 SW 5th Ave Portland OR PNNL 97204 Michael Litvinovich mlitvinovich@unvlt.com US 1267 Hamilton PKWY Itasca IL Universal Lighting Technologies 60143 Sarah Martin sarah.martin@navigant.com US 1200 19th Street WashingtonDC Navigant Consulting 20036 Astrid Mills astrid.mills@navigant.com US 1200 19th street washingtonDC Navigant 20036 Natalie Needham nneedham@junolightinggroup.comUS 12001 Exit Five Parkway Fishers IN Juno Lighting Group 46038 Joe Parisella joe.parisella@sylvania.com US 54 Cherry Hill Drive Danvers MAOSRAM SYLVANIA 01923 Craig Pawlak craig.pawlak@musco.com US 100 1st Ave W / PO Box 808Oskaloosa IA Musco Sports Lighting, LLC 52577 Liesel Schulte lschulte@franklinenergy.com US 12075 n corporate pkwy mequon WI Franklin Energy Services 53092 Alex Valenti avalenti@energy-solution.comUS 1610 Harrison Oakland CA Energy Solutions 94680 Linda Wilson linda.wilson@ag.ny.gov US 120 Broadway NY NY NYS OAG 10271 Dave Winiarski david.winiarski@pnnl.gov US 902 Battelle Boulevard Richland WAPacific Northwest National Laboratory 99354 Michael Woodford mwoodford@ahrinet.org US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite # 500Arlington VA AHRI 22201 

# General Information
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 9, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-51286 Summary Calendar

PRINCE S. J. WEBBER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CV-428-PRM

-------------------- Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Prince S. J. Webber, federal prisoner # 04349-000, (“Webber”) appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Webber’s petition sought relief from a decision of the United States Parole Commission rescinding a presumptive parole date of September 13, 2003, and continuing his incarceration to a presumptive parole date of September 13, 2005, on the basis of new and significant adverse information. The district court denied Webber’s motion to appeal in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and certified that the appealNo. 03-51286 -2- was not taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and F ED . R. A PP . P. 24(a). Webber has filed a motion for leave to appeal IFP, thereby challenging the district court’s certification. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Webber also has filed a motion for appointment of appellate counsel. The counsel motion is DENIED. Webber’s appellate issues do not involve legal points that are arguable on their merits. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Contrary to his assertions, the record reflects that the Commission’s decision was based on new and significant adverse information because Webber had failed to comply with a condition to the 2003 presumptive parole date. The Commission complied with the parole statutes in summarizing a psychological report at the hearing and withholding from Webber a copy of the full report. Webber has made no cogent argument that he was prejudiced by the Commission’s alleged failure to comply with statutory deadlines. Webber’s other arguments are incomprehensible and therefore any other issues are deemed abandoned. See United States v. Cothran , 302 F.3d 279, 286 n.7 (5th Cir. 2002). Webber’s IFP motion is DENIED and this appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2; Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24. MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
§ 171.25 Minimum requirements for approval. ( a ) The following are the minimum requirements that must be met before the FAA will approve an IFR procedure for a non-Federal, nondirectional radio beacon facility under this subpart: ( 1 ) The facility's performances, as determined by air and ground inspection, must meet the requirements of § 171.27.
( 2 ) The installation of the equipment must meet the requirements of § 171.29.
( 3 ) The owner must agree to operate and maintain the facility in accord- ance with § 171.31.
( 4 ) The owner must agree to furnish periodic reports, as set forth in § 171.33, and agree to allow the FAA to inspect the facility and its operation whenever necessary.
( 5 ) The owner must assure the FAA that he will not withdraw the facility from service without the permission of the FAA.
( 6 ) The owner must bear all costs of meeting the requirements of this section and of any flight or ground inspections made before the facility is commissioned, except that the Federal Aviation Administration may bear certain of these costs subject to budgetary limitations and policy established by the Administrator.
( b ) If the applicant for approval meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, the FAA commissions the facility as a prerequisite to its approval for use in an IFR procedure. The approval is withdrawn at any time the facility does not continue to meet those requirements. In addition, the facility may be de-commissioned whenever the frequency channel is needed for higher priority common system service.
[Doc. No. 5034, 29 FR 11337, Aug. 6, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 171-6, 35 FR 10288, June 24, 1970]