alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31-Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive
           Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert Kamon, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Australian-
Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
   material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
   is being prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
   and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
   this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   c) Presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
   evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
   controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
   record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
   identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
   internal controls; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
   other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
   internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:   April 14, 2005                 /s/ ROBERT KAMON
                                      -----------------------------
                                      Robert Kamon, Secretary and
                                      Chief Financial Officer

                             Exhibit 31
#### JOHN W. NORD v. UNITED STATES

[78 C.Cls. 795 ; 293 U.S. 576]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court October 8, 1934.
#### § 158.83 Informal resolution.

The Administrator shall undertake informal resolution with the public agency or any other affected party if, after review under § 158.71, the Administrator cannot determine that PFC revenue is being used for the approved projects in accordance with the terms of the Administrator's approval to impose a PFC for those projects or with 49 U.S.C. 40117.

[Doc. No. 26385, 56 FR 24278, May 29, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 158-2, 65 FR 34543, May 30, 2000]
DEP Home About DEP Programs Contact Site Map Search

Programs

Coastal &

Aquatic

Home

Aquatic

Preserves

National

Estuarine

Research

Reserves

Florida Keys

National

Marine

Sanctuary

Coral Reef

Conservation

Program

Information

About Us

Contacts

Public

Notices

Related

Programs

Florida

Oceans

Council

Gulf of

Mexico

Program

Gulf of

Mexico

Alliance

LIFE

Program

Physical Features of St. Joseph Bay Aquatic Preserve Quick Topics

St. Joseph Bay is a large body

of water enclosed by St.

Joseph Peninsula.

The St. Joseph Peninsula is 17

miles long and has an

average width of 1,000 feet.

It is formed from the Cape

San Blas shoals and the

historical migration of the

Apalachicola River.

The cape and the spit

sediments are quartz sands

originally supplied by the

Apalachicola River. Waves

and other shore zone

processes have put the

beaches in a constant state of

change over the last hundred

years.

Cape San Blas is one of the

most critically eroding

shorelines in Florida.

St. Joseph Bay is not

significantly influenced by

freshwater inflows, therefore,

the salinity is 35 ppt -

essentially the same as the

Gulf.

The surface area of the bay is

approximately 43,872 acres.

The bay's deepest parts are

35 feet near the point, and

the southern end averages 3

feet.

The preserve is a part of the

ApalachicolaChattahoochee-Flint

watershed.

White sand beaches of St. Joseph Bay

St. Joseph Bay

Aquatic Preserve

Quick Facts

Description of Site

Recreation

Resources

Physical Features

Archaeological

Resources

Natural Communities

Species

Management

Maps and Other

Publications

Volunteering

Last updated: July 07, 2011

3900 Commonwealth Boulevard M.S. 235 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850-245-2094 (phone) / 850-245-2110 (fax)

Contact Us

DEP Home | About DEP | Contact Us | Search | Site Map

Physical Features of St. Joseph Bay Aquatic Preserve http://www.dep.state.fl.us/coastal/sites/stjoseph/resources/physical.htm

1 of 1 10/14/2011 3:26 PM
Editorial Note on Part 139
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

§ 139.201 General requirements. ( a ) No person may operate an airport subject to this part unless that person adopts and complies with an Airport Certification Manual, as required under this part, that— ( 1 ) Has been approved by the Administrator;
( 2 ) Contains only those items authorized by the Administrator;
( 3 ) Is in printed form and signed by the certificate holder acknowledging the certificate holder's responsibility to operate the airport in compliance with the Airport Certification Manual approved by the Administrator; and
( 4 ) Is in a form that is easy to revise and organized in a manner helpful to the preparation, review, and approval processes, including a revision log. In addition, each page or attachment must include the date of the Administrator's initial approval or approval of the latest revision.
( b ) Each holder of an Airport Operating Certificate must— ( 1 ) Keep its Airport Certification Manual current at all times;
( 2 ) Maintain at least one complete and current copy of its approved Airport Certification Manual on the airport, which will be available for inspection by the Administrator; and
( 3 ) Furnish the applicable portions of the approved Airport Certification Manual to airport personnel responsible for its implementation.
( c ) Each certificate holder must ensure that the Regional Airports Division Manager is provided a complete copy of its most current approved Airport Certification Manual, as specified under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, including any amendments approved under § 139.205.
( d ) FAA Advisory Circulars contain methods and procedures for the development of Airport Certification Manuals that are acceptable to the Administrator.
#### § 25.1727 Flammable fluid shutoff means: EWIS.

EWIS associated with each flammable fluid shutoff means and control must be fireproof or must be located and protected so that any fire in a fire zone will not affect operation of the flammable fluid shutoff means, in accordance with the requirements of § 25.1189.
#### § 25.1723 Flammable fluid fire protection: EWIS.

EWIS components located in each area where flammable fluid or vapors might escape by leakage of a fluid system must be considered a potential ignition source and must meet the requirements of § 25.863.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

BULLETIN 1032 PLATE 16
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a = _

EXPLANATION Ae
JGNEOUS ROCKS soot e040"

Biotite grant
pegmatite

(METASEDIMENTARY ROCKS

Biotite quartz
includes some

t
:
i

nels; 4 7960"
eles 7960

located or inferred

Strike and dip of foliation

+
‘Strike of vertical foliation

“hee
Strike and dip of foliation
‘and plunge ef lineation

x

‘Strike and dip of aplite dike

+7800"

‘TRUE NORTH

a
‘Strike of foliation,
‘ip not own

Strike and dip of joints

}-7760'

te
‘Strike of verict joints
= Tr20.

Sheeting

Vert sat
cal Dump E
we) —— ‘Aluwum and glacial Predominantly amphibole Predominantly biotite-quartz-
i lace gress od
Openeut esas, RN 4 = Smphibote are
a na nPe HP - —— tte BHAZ
Incined damandil hae show oe of? ——
a Inferred contact Fault, dashed where a
acl infeed Intersection of dil tole Onl hole ected to
Wikane of sector’ pane of secton

L760

448648 0 -57 (In pocket)

oo mo =
Z

Diamond core dling by U. S. Bureau of Mines _ [= St mooi by PK Sm Goren Pe

waaay te OUTCROP MAP AND SECTIONS OF THE COPPER KING MINE AREA, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO '

80 ° . 240 Feet
Contour interval 5 feet
‘Datum assumed
§ 25.1023 Oil radiators. ( a ) Each oil radiator must be able to withstand, without failure, any vibration, inertia, and oil pressure load to which it would be subjected in operation.
( b ) Each oil radiator air duct must be located so that, in case of fire, flames coming from normal openings of the engine nacelle cannot impinge directly upon the radiator.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3021 Filed:05/07/18 Entered:05/07/18 10:05:35 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3021 Filed:05/07/18 Entered:05/07/18 10:05:35 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24867 Filed:08/11/23 Entered:08/11/23 15:38:36 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24867 Filed:08/11/23 Entered:08/11/23 15:38:36 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24867 Filed:08/11/23 Entered:08/11/23 15:38:36 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  By:
    
    /s/ Philip Cook
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Glenn DardenPhilip Cook
    
    
    
    
    
    Glenn DardenSenior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer
    
    
    
    
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
#### FLEMING et al. v. WRIGHT.

No. 32512.

Oct. 21, 1947.

*185 P. 2d 915.*

W. R. Bleakmore and James E. Grigsby, both of Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error.

Wm. L. Anderson and Harley Ivy, both of Waurika, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment entered against them in the trial court and on February 19, 1946, filed their brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The plaintiff has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court but the cause may be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment entered for the plaintiff and to dismiss the action.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Element 21 Golf Company (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nataliya
Hearn, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Executive
Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Date:
      November 13, 2009
            
            By:  /s/
      Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D.President
      and Director, and Principal Executive Officer
457379 0-58 (In pocket)

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

EXPLANATION

Cloyey sand

‘Sandy clay

Clay
Phosphote pellets

Leached phosphorite

ESS

Limestone or dolomite

BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 113

True north >
Me %

Drill cuttings logged by G.H. Espenshode

‘and L.A. Bruboker, March 1955

LONGITUDINAL SECTIONS AND PLAN

Radioactivity 109, in
counts per minute

Drilt hole 23 Britt Dritt id To
° fi 21
BERD Ee Dril! hole 24
SEq SE 4 80c.3,T.I7S,, R22 E. need neat TITS. R.22E. =
Rood
ore 6.2, 7.I7S., R.22E. | Nw: ew tea 28 TITS. R.22E.
(Postion ‘of corner opproximate)
Quarry; sandy phosphatic limestone
‘exposed in east side Fossil
collecting locality 63
Milliroentgens
per hour
0.100)
0.050
Gommo-ray readings on surface by hand scintillation counter 0.000
(Includes casmic companent)
Drill hole 22 Drill hole 21 outcrop
ss Drill nole24 ‘Buriiee cate
Drill hole 23, fecia:
Miocene limestone
50 ° 50 100 150 200 feet Gockel flivestone
Projection of quorry about
190ft east of section
50
Drill hole2t
Altitude above
Drill hole 22 ‘seo level
‘Somple Percent Percent Percent
wed he 0, quartz
Deaths, are 0008 63 648
Percent Pergent Percent Same 0 gex2as «004 66 — [ 120 Feet
quartz 0, U 37244 006 54 68
aa Drill
— 87 0026 x249 ee hole 24
os Ol 43S
7 Depths Sample Percent Percent Percent
— 105 ot in feet No. u BO, uortz: bt
rit! 267 70 002 x250 ~ 248.001 " ‘a aoe % ©
hole 23 —135 ie — =
_ Rock 9 4009 2,0P0 x257 0.002 20 602
72 O01 x251 Rodiooetivity 109, in “Ss ? 50—
—178 counts per minute
358 69 002 x252 x258 002 5.1 30.0 ba
Depths Sample Porat Percent Percent a i
feet No. quortz pte” 5s—
—_ 567 53.001 x253 j 1259 «002 62531
— 265
55 —
x255 0003 69 371 Ae. Be" |e eee Radiosetivity log,in counts per minute 1,000
75.
x 256 002 75 529 Radioactivity log, in ee)
ee counts per minute

OF AUGER DRILL HOLES 21-24 IN SE. % SEC. 3, T. 17S. R. 22 E.. MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10209

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUSTIN NEIL PATTERSON, also known as Raver,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CR-195

Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Justin Neil Patterson appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce the 235-month sentence imposed on his guilty 

plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to 

distribute more than 50 grams of pure methamphetamine under 21 U.S.C. 

§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). Patterson contends that he was entitled to a two-level 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 26, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10209 Document: 00513481293 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/26/2016
No. 15-10209

2

reduction in his offense level based on Amendment 782 to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 and 

that the district court denied his motion without reason. 

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), a sentence may be modified if the 

defendant’s term of imprisonment was based on a sentencing range later 

lowered by the Sentencing Commission and made retroactively available. 

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a); Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 825–26 (2010). 

When considering a § 3582(c)(2) motion, the district court is to conduct a twostep analysis. Dillon, 560 U.S. at 826. The court must first determine whether 

the defendant is eligible for a reduction under § 1B1.10. Id. at 827. If he is, the 

district court must then “consider any applicable § 3553(a) factors and 

determine whether, in its discretion,” a reduction is warranted under the facts 

of the case. Id. This court reviews a district court’s sentence reduction 

determination under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion, its interpretation of 

the Guidelines de novo, and its findings of fact for clear error. United States v. 

Henderson, 636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011). 

In Patterson’s case, our analysis ends with the first step. Contrary to his

contention, the district court’s order addressed his eligibility for a sentence 

reduction, correctly holding that he was not eligible. Amendment 782 provides

a base offense level of 38 for a defendant convicted of an offense involving 4.5

kilograms of “Ice” methamphetamine—the same level applied to Patterson. 

Compare U.S.S.G., APP. C., AMEND. 782, with § 2D1.1(c)(1) (2005). Thus, the 

district court was without authority to “modify [the] term of imprisonment . . . 

imposed” on Patterson. Dillon, 560 U.S. at 819. Because Patterson fails the 

first part of the Dillon analysis, additional discussion is unnecessary. Id. at 

826.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-10209 Document: 00513481293 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/26/2016
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00655-CV

Rosaly CANALES d/b/a Marathon Bulk Transport,

Appellant

v.

CAPITOL AGGREGATES, INC.,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI05174

Honorable Cathy Stryker, Judge Presiding1

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the portion of the trial court’s judgment 

awarding damages in the amount of $500,000 and exemplary damages in the amount of $1,000,000 

is REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED for a new trial on the issue of these unliquidated 

damages. The remaining part of the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED August 5, 2020.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

1

The Honorable Cathy Stryker signed the default judgment. The Honorable Michael E. Mery heard the motion for 

new trial.
§ 1310.6 Staff. ( a ) *Executive Director.* The Executive Director advises and assists the Board in carrying out its responsibilities under the Act, provides general direction with respect to the administration of the Board's actions, directs the activities of the staff, and performs such other duties as the Board may require.
( b ) *Legal Counsel.* The Legal Counsel provides legal advice relating to the responsibilities of the Board and performs such other duties as the Executive Director may require.
( c ) *Chief Administrative Officer.* The Chief Administrative Officer sends notice of all meetings, prepares minutes of all meetings, maintains a complete record of all votes and actions taken by the Board, has custody of all records of the Board and performs such other duties as the Executive Director may require.
#### § 23.2550 Equipment containing high-energy rotors.

Equipment containing high-energy rotors must be designed or installed to protect the occupants and airplane from uncontained fragments.
# Official Journal C 359/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.359.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 359 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5521 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.359.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 359

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5521 November 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 359/01 | State aid — Denmark — State aid No SA.34445 (2012/C) (ex 2012/N) — The transfer of property-related assets from FIH to the FSC — Denmark — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU (1) | 1 |
| 2012/C 359/02 | State aid — Spain — State aid C SA.31273 ex N 313/2010 — Ultracongelados Antártida S.A. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1) | 11 |
| 2012/C 359/03 | State aid — Greece — State aid No SA.34824 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Recapitalisation of National Bank of Greece by the Hellenic Financial Stability Fund — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU (1) | 18 |
| 2012/C 359/04 | State aid — Greece — State aid No SA.34825 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Recapitalisation of EFG Eurobank by the Hellenic Financial Stability Fund — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU (1) | 31 |
| 2012/C 359/05 | State aid — Greece — State aid No SA.34826 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Recapitalisation of Piraeus Bank by the Hellenic Financial Stability Fund — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU (1) | 43 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2012/C 359/01

State aid — Denmark — State aid No SA.34445 (2012/C) (ex 2012/N) — The transfer of property-related assets from FIH to the FSC — Denmark — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU (1)

1

2012/C 359/02

State aid — Spain — State aid C SA.31273 ex N 313/2010 — Ultracongelados Antártida S.A. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1)

11

2012/C 359/03

State aid — Greece — State aid No SA.34824 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Recapitalisation of National Bank of Greece by the Hellenic Financial Stability Fund — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU (1)

18

2012/C 359/04

State aid — Greece — State aid No SA.34825 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Recapitalisation of EFG Eurobank by the Hellenic Financial Stability Fund — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU (1)

31

2012/C 359/05

State aid — Greece — State aid No SA.34826 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Recapitalisation of Piraeus Bank by the Hellenic Financial Stability Fund — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU (1)

43

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 185.1 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to name the FAA officials who, pursuant to part 9 of the regulations of the Office of the Secretary of Transportation (49 CFR part 9) as amended (34 FR 11972, July 16, 1969), are those: ( 1 ) Upon whom legal process or pleadings may be served in any legal proceeding concerning the FAA, and who have authority to acknowledge the service and take further action thereon; and
( 2 ) Who otherwise perform the functions prescribed by part 9 in legal proceedings concerning the FAA with respect to testimony by FAA employees and production of FAA records in legal proceedings.
( b ) For purposes of this part, “legal proceedings” includes any proceeding before a court of law, administrative board or commission, hearing officer, or other body conducting a legal or administrative proceeding.