alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3958 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to permit the use of incentive 

payments to expedite certain federally financed airport development projects. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2020 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to permit the use 

of incentive payments to expedite certain federally financed airport development projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expedited Delivery of 

5 Airport Infrastructure Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALLOWABLE COST STANDARDS FOR AIRPORT DE7 VELOPMENT PROJECTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 47110(b)(1) of title 49, 

9 United States Code, is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3958 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘(1) if the cost necessarily’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘(1)(A) if the cost necessarily’’; 

3 (2) by striking the semicolon at the end and in4 serting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(B) if the cost is an incentive payment in7 curred in carrying out the project described in sub8 paragraph (A) that is to be provided to a contractor 

9 upon early completion of a project, if— 

10 ‘‘(i) such payment does not exceed the less11 er of 5 percent of the initial construction con12 tract amount or $1,000,000; 

13 ‘‘(ii) the level of contractor’s control of, or 

14 access to, the worksite necessary to shorten the 

15 duration of the project does not negatively im16 pact the operation of the airport; 

17 ‘‘(iii) the contract specifies application of 

18 the incentive structure in the event of unfore19 seeable, non-weather delays beyond the control 

20 of the contractor; 

21 ‘‘(iv) nothing in any agreement with the 

22 contractor prevents the airport operator from 

23 retaining responsibility for the safety, efficiency, 

24 and capacity of the airport during the execution 

25 of the grant agreement; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3958 IS

1 ‘‘(v) the Secretary determines that the use 

2 of an incentive payment is likely to increase air3 port capacity or efficiency as a result of short4 ening the project’s duration;’’. 

5 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 47110(e)(7) 

6 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘(7) PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AIRPORTS.—’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘(7) PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AIRPORTS.—’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
§ 25.345 High lift devices. ( a ) If wing flaps are to be used during takeoff, approach, or landing, at the design flap speeds established for these stages of flight under § 25.335(e) and with the wing flaps in the corresponding positions, the airplane is assumed to be subjected to symmetrical maneuvers and gusts. The resulting limit loads must correspond to the conditions determined as follows: ( 1 ) Maneuvering to a positive limit load factor of 2.0; and
( 2 ) Positive and negative gusts of 25 ft/sec EAS acting normal to the flight path in level flight. Gust loads resulting on each part of the structure must be determined by rational analysis. The analysis must take into account the unsteady aerodynamic characteristics and rigid body motions of the aircraft. The shape of the gust must be as described in § 25.341(a)(2) except that— Uds = 25 ft/sec EAS; H = 12.5 c; and c = mean geometric chord of the wing (feet).
( b ) The airplane must be designed for the conditions prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section, except that the airplane load factor need not exceed 1.0, taking into account, as separate conditions, the effects of— ( 1 ) Propeller slipstream corresponding to maximum continuous power at the design flap speeds *V* *F,* and with takeoff power at not less than 1.4 times the stalling speed for the particular flap position and associated maximum weight; and
( 2 ) A head-on gust of 25 feet per second velocity (EAS).
( c ) If flaps or other high lift devices are to be used in en route conditions, and with flaps in the appropriate position at speeds up to the flap design speed chosen for these conditions, the airplane is assumed to be subjected to symmetrical maneuvers and gusts within the range determined by— ( 1 ) Maneuvering to a positive limit load factor as prescribed in § 25.337(b); and
( 2 ) The vertical gust and turbulence conditions prescribed in § 25.341(a) and (b).
( d ) The airplane must be designed for a maneuvering load factor of 1.5 g at the maximum take-off weight with the wing-flaps and similar high lift devices in the landing configurations.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-46, 43 FR 50595, Oct. 30, 1978; Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 37607, Sept. 17, 1990; Amdt. 25-86, 61 FR 5221, Feb. 9, 1996; Amdt. 25-91, 62 FR 40704, July 29, 1997; Amdt. 25-141, 79 FR 73468, Dec. 11, 2014]
DPR MODIFIED PROMESA B1040 (FORM 1040) (05/17)

PROMESA COVER SHEET

(Instructions on Reverse)

CASE NUMBER

(Court Use Only)

PLAINTIFFS (DEBTOR, if Title III Petition; 

ISSUER, if Title VI Application)

DEFENDANTS

ATTORNEYS (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone 

No.)

ATTORNEYS (If Known)

PARTY (Check One Box Only)

  Debtor

  Creditor

  Trustee

  U.S. Trustee/Bankruptcy Admin

  Other

PARTY (Check One Box Only) 

  Debtor

  Creditor

  Trustee

  U.S. Trustee/Bankruptcy Admin

  Other

CAUSE OF ACTION (WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE OF ACTION, INCLUDING ALL U.S. STATUTES INVOLVED)

NATURE OF SUIT

 PROMESA Title III Petition  PROMESA Title VI Application for Approval of Modifications 

 Other Federal Question  Adversary Proceeding  Demand $ __________

If Adversary Proceeding is checked, number up to five (5) boxes starting with lead cause of action as 1, first 

alternative cause as 2, second alternative cause as 3, etc., below:

FRBP 7001(1) – Recovery of Money/Property

 11-Recovery of money/property - §542 turnover of 

property

 12-Recovery of money/property - §547 preference

 13-Recovery of money/property - §548 fraudulent 

transfer

 14-Recovery of money/property – other

FRBP 7001(2) - Validity, Priority or Extent of Lien

 21-Validity, priority or extent of lien or other interest 

in property

FRBP 7001(5) – Revocation of Confirmation

 51-Revocation of confirmation

FRBP 7001(7) – Injunctive Relief 

 71-Injunctive relief - imposition of stay

 72-Injunctive relief - other 

FRBP 7001(8) Subordination of Claim or Interest

 81-Subordination of claim or interest

FRBP 7001(9) Declaratory Judgment

 91-Declaratory judgment

FRBP 7001(10) Determination of Removed Action

 01-Determination of removed claim or cause

Other

 02-Other (e.g. other actions that would have been 

brought in state court if unrelated to bankruptcy case)

TITLE III CASE IN WHICH THIS ADVERSARY PROCEEDING ARISES

NAME OF DEBTOR CASE NO.

DISTRICT IN WHICH CASE IS PENDING DIVISION OFFICE NAME OF JUDGE

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2951-1 Filed:04/24/18 Entered:04/24/18 09:22:37 Desc:

Exhibit Promesa Adversary Cover Sheet Page 1 of 2
DPR MODIFIED PROMESA B1040 (FORM 1040) (05/17)

RELATED ADVERSARY PROCEEDING (IF ANY)

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT ADVERSARY

PROCEEDING NO.

DISTRICT IN WHICH CASE IS PENDING DIVISION OFFICE NAME OF JUDGE

SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF)

DATE PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF)

THIS FORM IS TO BE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR FILINGS RELATING TO THE PUERTO RICO OVERSIGHT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC STABILITY 

ACT (PROMESA). FOR ADMINISTRATION PURPOSES ONLY, THE PUBLIC DOCKETS FOR PROMESA PROCEEDINGS UNDER TITLE III AND 

ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS WILL BE MAINTAINED ON THE CASE MANAGEMENT/ELECTRONIC CASE FILING (CM/ECF) SYSTEM OF THE UNITED 

STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO. THESE CASES ARE UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES 

DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2951-1 Filed:04/24/18 Entered:04/24/18 09:22:37 Desc:

Exhibit Promesa Adversary Cover Sheet Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
10.23


 


April 7, 2003


 


Gary Wright


 


Dear Gary:


 


Congratulations on your
recent appointment to Executive VP Sales, Field Operations, Marketing and
International.  Your monthly salary will
be $23,333.34 which is an annual equivalent of $280,000.  Your salary will be retroactive back to
January 1, 2003.


 


In this new job, you will
need to relocate yourself and your family to the Bay Area.  You will receive moving expense
reimbursement including points on the sale of your home up to a maximum of
$60,000.  Your move to the Bay Area
should be completed no later than December 31,  2003.  You are eligible to receive a quarterly
bonus during 2003 of $30,000 per quarter, 50% based on achieving the bookings
goal and 50% based on achieving the gross margin goal as detailed in your 2003
Compensation Plan.


 


Additionally, you have
been granted 27,910 shares that will be 100% vested on November 5, 2008,
provided, however, that (i) 25% of the shares shall vest on March 31, 2003 if
the company meets the quarterly financial goals for Q1 2003 (ii) 25% of the
shares shall vest on June 30, 2003 if the Company meets the quarterly financial
goals for Q2 2003, (iii) 25% of the shares shall vest on September 31, 2003 if
the Company meets the quarterly financial goals for Q3 2003, and (iv) 25% of
the shares shall vest on December 31, 2003 if the Company meets the quarterly
financial goals for Q4 2003.


 


If your employment is
terminated without cause, you will receive severance pay equivalent to twelve
(12) months’ salary at your base rate of pay in effect immediately prior to
termination and COBRA reimbursement for you and your family for one (1) year
following termination.  “Cause” is
defined as (1) conviction of any felony or (2) participation in fraud,
misappropriation, embezzlement or other similar act of dishonesty or material
misconduct against the Company (or its subsidiaries or affiliates).


 


As with all compensation
matters, this agreement should remain confidential.  You agree to keep the terms of this arrangement completely confidential
and will not disclose it to anyone other than your professional advisors, and
immediate family members who have a need to know.  You agree that if any willful disclosure to other members of the
Company is made by you, as a penalty for disclosure, you will forfeit and repay
the entire relocation amount.


 


 


Sincerely,


 


	
  /s/  RANDALL A. LIPPS

  	
   

  
	
  Randall A. Lipps

  
	
  Chairman, President and
  CEO

  



 

















 


To indicate your
acceptance of the Company’s offer, please sign and date this letter in the
space provided below and return it to Human Resources via confidential
means.  A duplicate has been included
for your records.  The above offer is
good for five (5) days from the date of issue.


 


 


	
  /s/  GARY. WRIGHT

  	
   

  	
  GARY WRIGHT

  	
   

  	
  May 5, 2003

  	
   

  
	
  Acceptance Signature

  	
   

  	
  Print

  	
   

  	
  Date

  	
   

  



 


2
#### JONES v. THE STATE.

(Decided February 2nd, 1915.)

Appeal from Dale Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. M. Sollie.

No counsel marked for appellant. Robert C. Brick-ell, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### § 1310.2 Composition of the Board.

The Board consists of the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the designee of the Chairman, who acts as Chairman of the Board, the Secretary of the Treasury or the designee of the Secretary, the Secretary of Transportation or the designee of the Secretary, and the Comptroller General of the United States or the designee of the Comptroller General, who serves as a nonvoting member. The Comptroller General of the United States or the designee of the Comptroller General, who serves as a nonvoting member, shall not be involved in any of the Board's discussions or deliberations in connection with individual loan guarantee applications.
#### UNITED STATES v. JEFFERSON ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING CO.

(Together with two Circuit Court of Appeals cases)

[77 C.Cls. 199; 291 U.S. 386]

*848Mr. Justice Van Devanter

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court.
#### Davis *v.*The State.

*Crime.*

(Decided June 15, 1915.

69 South. 338.)

*Appeal and Error; Transcript; Certificate.*— Where the transcript of appeal contains no certificate of the clerk of the court from which the appeal comes that it was a complete transcript of all the proceedings, in the cause, as required by section 2818, Code 1907, and no certificate that the transcript is correct, or is a transcript of the record and proceedings in the case, the appeal cannot be entertained, but must be dismissed.

Appeal from St. Clair Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. J. E. Blackwood.

Tom Davis was convicted of crime, and he appeals

Appeal dismissed.

No counsel marked for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and W. H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

PELHAM, P. J.

The submission in this case is made on the motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal on the ground that there is no certificate showing that the transcript filed is a correct transcript of the record in the court below.

The appeal purports to be from a judgment of the circuit court of St. Clair county for the Northern judicial division, but the transcript does not contain a certificate of the clerk of the court that it is a complete transcript of all the proceedings in the cause, as required by section 2848 of the Code of 1907, nor a certificate of auy kind certifying to the transcript as being correct or a transcript of the record and proceedings in the case. The motion of the Attorney General, in this condition of the record, must prevail.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 16.15 Service of documents on the parties and the agency. Except as otherwise provided in this part, documents shall be served as follows: ( a ) *Whom must be served.* Copies of all documents filed with the FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk shall be served by the persons filing them on all parties to the proceeding. A certificate of service shall accompany all documents when they are tendered for filing and shall certify concurrent service on the FAA and all parties. Certificates of service shall be in substantially the following form: I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing [name of document] on the following persons at the following addresses, facsimile numbers (if also served by facsimile), or email address (if served electronically in accordance with § 16.13(h)), by [specify method of service]: [list persons, addresses, facsimile numbers, email addresses (as applicable)] Dated this _day of _, 20_. [signature], for [party]
( b ) Method of service. Except as otherwise agreed by the parties and, if applicable, the hearing officer, the method of service is the same as set forth in § 16.13(b) for filing documents.
( c ) *Where service shall be made.* Service shall be made to the persons identified in accordance with § 16.13(f). If no such person has been designated, service shall be made on the party.
( d ) *Presumption of service.* There shall be a presumption of lawful service— ( 1 ) When acknowledgment of receipt is by a person who customarily or in the ordinary course of business receives mail at the address of the party or of the person designated under § 16.13(f);
( 2 ) When a properly addressed envelope, sent to the most current address submitted under § 16.13(f), has been returned as undeliverable, unclaimed, or refused; or
( 3 ) When the party serving the document electronically has a confirmation statement demonstrating that the email was properly sent to a party correctly addressed.
( e ) *Date of service.* The date of service shall be determined in the same manner as the filing date under § 16.13(b).
[Doc. No. 27783, 61 FR 54004, Oct. 16, 1996, as amended at Amdt. 16-1, 78 FR 56143, Sept. 12, 2013]
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.56 Applicable fare when no through local or joint fares.

Where no applicable local or joint fare is provided from point of origin to point of destination over the route of movement, whichever combination of applicable fares provided over the route of movement produces the lowest charge shall be applicable, except that a carrier may provide explicitly that a fare cannot be used in any combination or in a combination on particular traffic or under specified conditions, provided another combination is available.
# Official Journal C 388/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 388 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6215 November 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 388

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6215 November 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 388/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2019/C 388/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 7 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 388/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2019/C 388/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1252 Prepped byCandice Davis



## Document

Number: 

# 67 ) ll-A- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-90-22

Printed 5/21/2008 11:46:01 AM Sheet 67 of 184P.2 

# f/EPA Unite d State s Environmenta l Protectio n Agency Offic e ofAi rQualit y Plannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Par k N C 2771 1 -V_,a_s : ' -8 1 Ai r 

# Bul k Gasolin e Terminals Backgroun d Informatio n fo r Promulgate d Standard s Fina l EI S B.-2443 

# A-90-2 2 ll-A- 1



# RADIA N LIBRAR

Y DURHAM , N . C . EP AAI R DOCKE T

:c

_ _P. 3

Thi s report ha s bee n reviewe d byth e Emissio n Standard s an d Engineerin g Divisio n o fth e Offic e o fAi r Qualit yPlannin g an d Standards , EPA , an d approve d fo rpublication . Mentio n oftrad e name s o rcommercia l product s i s no t intende d t o constitut e endorsemen to rrecommendatio n fo ruse . Copie s o fthi s repor tar e availabl e throug h th e LibraryService s Offic e (MD-35) , U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc h Triangl e Park , NC . 27711 , o rfro m th e Nationa l Technica l Informatio n Services , 528 5 Por tRoya l Road , Springfield , Virgini a 22161 .

Publicatio n No . EPA-450/3-80-038 b

I 

# JP. 4

NOTE S FO R TABLE S 8- 1 AN D 8- 2 Carbo n Adsorptio n Unit . Therma l Oxidatio n Unit . 'Refrigeratio n Unit . Include s on e performanc e tes t plu s $5,00 0 equipmen t cost . 'Cos t o f installin g vapo r collectio n equipmen t o n existin g botto m loadin g tank trucks , $3,00 0 pe r truck . Cos t o f convertin g to p loadin g rack s t o botto m loadin g an d vapo r recovery , $200,00 0 pe r rack . ^Cos t o f retrofittin g existin g to p loadin g tan k truck s wit hbotto m loadin g and vapo r collectio n equipment , $6,40 0 pe r tan k truck . h Electricit ycost s ar e base d o n averag e consumptio n rate s reporte d b y manufacturers . Propan e fo rpilo tburne restimate d a t12. 5 liter s pe rhour , a t $0.1 8 pe r liter . ^Estimate d activate d carbo n replacemen t perio d i s 1 0 years , a t $3.8 5 pe r kilogra m carbo n cost . k Estimate d as 4 percen t o funi tpurchas e cost , plu s annua l rac k vapo r collectio n maintenanc e o f$20 0 pe rrac k an d $20 0 pe rterminal . Dail ysyste m inspection s a t1 hou rpe rday , plu s a monthl yinspectio n fo rliqui d an d vapo rleak s i n th e vapo rcollectio n an d processin g systems . Include s capita l charge s o n continuou s monito rinvestmen tplu s $2,50 0 annua l operatin g cost . n Cos t t o perform.annua l vapo rtightnes s testing , includin g one-hal f da ydowntime , $30 0 pe rtruck . ^Tota l capita l investmen t(les s monitor ) x(capita l recover yfacto r+ 0.04) , wher e interes t rat e = 1 7 percent , equipmen teconomi clif e = 1 0 years . B- 5
#### Charles Timothy EMERY *v.*STATE of Arkansas

5797

489 S.W. 2d 17

Opinion delivered January 15, 1973

*William McArthur,*for appellant.

*Ray Thornton,*Atty. Gen., by: *Lonnie Powers,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant Charles Timothy Emery filed a motion to dismiss the charges of burglary and grand larceny against him for failure to prosecute within the time limits set out in Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-1708 (Repl. 1964), but before the motion was ruled on by *769the court, he entered a plea of guilty. After sentence, he filed a post conviction petition to set aside his convictions on the basis that his constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated. The trial court denied his post conviction petition on the basis that his guilty plea voluntarily waived his alleged right to a speedy trial. We agree. See *McDonald*v. *State, 253*Ark. 23, 484 S.W. 2d 345 (1972), and *People*v. *DeCola,*15 Ill. 2d 527, 155 N.E. 2d 622 (1958).

Furthermore, we have not found in the record where a delay of more than two terms has occurred except upon the application of appellant or because of his absence.

Affirmed.