alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 161.409 Required analysis by reevaluation petitioner. ( a ) An aircraft operator that has petitioned the FAA to reevaluate a restriction shall assume the burden of analysis for the reevaluation.
( b ) The aircraft operator's analysis shall be made available for public review under the procedures in § 161.407 and shall include the following: ( 1 ) A copy of the restriction or the language of the agreement as incorporated in a local ordinance, airport rule, lease, or other document;
( 2 ) The aircraft operator's status under the restriction (e.g., currently affected operator, potential new entrant) and an explanation of the aircraft operator's specific objection to the restriction;
( 3 ) The quantified change in the noise environment using methodology specified in this part;
( 4 ) Evidence of the relationship between this change and the likelihood that the restriction does not meet one or more of the conditions in § 161.305; and
( 5 ) Sufficient data and analysis selected from § 161.305, as applicable to the restriction at issue, to support the contention made in paragraph (b)(4) of this section. This is to include either an adequate environmental assessment of the impacts of discontinuing all or part of a restriction in accordance with the aircraft operator's petition, or adequate information supporting a categorical exclusion under FAA orders implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
( c ) The amount of analysis may vary with the complexity of the restriction, the number and nature of the conditions in § 161.305 that are alleged to be unsupported, and the amount of previous analysis developed in support of the restriction. The aircraft operator may incorporate analysis previously developed in support of the restriction, including previous environmental documentation to the extent applicable. The applicant is responsible for providing substantial evidence, as described in § 161.305, that one or more of the conditions are not supported.
§ 16.203 Appearances, parties, and rights of parties. ( a ) *Appearances.* Any party may appear and be heard in person. ( 1 ) Any party may be accompanied, represented, or advised by an attorney licensed by a State, the District of Columbia, or a territory of the United States to practice law or appear before the courts of that State or territory, or by another person authorized by the hearing officer to be the party's representative.
( 2 ) An attorney, or other duly authorized representative, who represents a party shall file a notice of appearance in accordance with § 16.13.
( b ) *Parties and agency participation.* ( 1 ) The parties to the hearing are the complainant(s) and respondent(s) named in the hearing order, and the agency. The style of any pleadings filed under this Subpart shall name the respondent as the Appellant, and the Federal Aviation Administration as the Agency.
( 2 ) Unless otherwise specified in the hearing order, the agency attorney will serve as prosecutor for the agency from the date of issuance of the Director's Determination providing an opportunity for hearing.
[Doc. No. 27783, 61 FR 54004, Oct. 16, 1996, as amended at Amdt. 16-1, 78 FR 56146, Sept. 12, 2013]
#### § 187.53 Calculation of overflight fees.

(a) The FAA assesses a total fee that is the sum of the Enroute and Oceanic calculated fees.

(1) *Enroute fee.* The Enroute fee is calculated by multiplying the Enroute rate in paragraph (c) of this section by the total number of nautical miles flown through each segment of Enroute airspace divided by 100 (because the Enroute rate is expressed per 100 nautical miles).

(2) *Oceanic fee.* The Oceanic fee is calculated by multiplying the Oceanic rate in paragraph (c) of this section by the total number of nautical miles flown through each segment of Oceanic airspace divided by 100 (because the Oceanic rate is expressed per 100 nautical miles).

(b) Distance flown through each segment of Enroute or Oceanic airspace is based on the great circle distance (GCD) from the point of entry into U.S.-controlled airspace to the point of exit from U.S.-controlled airspace based on FAA flight data. Where actual entry and exit points are not available, the FAA will use the best available flight data to calculate the entry and exit points.

(c) The rate for each 100 nautical miles flown through Enroute or Oceanic airspace is:

| Time period | Enroute rate | Oceanic rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2018 | 58.45 | 23.15 |
| January 1,2018 to January 1, 2019 | 60.07 | 24.77 |
| January 1, 2019 and Beyond | 61.75 | 26.51 |

(d) The formula for the total overflight fee is:

Rij = E*DEij/100 + O*DOij/100

Where:

Rij = the total fee charged to aircraft flying between entry point i and exit point j.

DEij = total distance flown through each segment of Enroute airspace between entry point i and exit point j.

DOij = total distance flown through each segment of Oceanic airspace between entry point i and exit point j.

E and O = the Enroute and Oceanic rates, respectively, set forth in paragraph (c) of this section.

(e) The FAA will review the rates described in this section at least once every 2 years and will adjust them to reflect the current costs and volume of the services provided.

[Docket FAA-2015-3597, Amdt. 187-36, 81 FR 85853, Nov. 29, 2016]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 **Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, H. Lynn Harton, Chief Executive Officer of The South Financial Group, Inc. (“TSFG”) certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of TSFG (the “Report”): 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TSFG. 

 

 

| /s/ H. Lynn Harton  |
|--------------------------|

H. Lynn Harton

Chief Executive Officer

The South Financial Group, Inc.

August 7, 2009

 

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The South Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to        the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### WHEELER v. THE STATE.

(Decided February 14th, 1915.)

Appeal from Geneva Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

W. O. Mulkey, for appellant." William L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

Affirmed on the record.
|Exhibit 99.3
|------------





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) by CGI Group Inc. (the Company),  the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                       
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: December 23, 2005

/s/ Serge GodinSerge Godin

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer





---
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 23(a)

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
               --------------------------------------------------

         We have issued our reports dated January 15, 1997 (except for notes 2
and 6, as to which the dates are January 21, 1997 and February 5, 1997, 
respectively) accompanying the consolidated financial statements incorporated
by reference or included in the Annual Report of JeffBanks, Inc. (formerly
named State Bancshares, Inc.) and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
reports in the Registration Statements of JeffBanks, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File 
No. 333-20111, effective January 30, 1997, File No. 333-18775, effective
Janaury 21, 1997 and File No. 33-99988, effective November 24, 1995) and
Form S-8 (File No. 33-80654 and File No. 33-80656, effective June 23, 1994).


GRANT THORNTON LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1997
§ 119.9 Use of business names. ( a ) A certificate holder under this part may not operate an aircraft under part 121 or part 135 of this chapter using a business name other than a business name appearing in the certificate holder's operations specifications.
( b ) No person may operate an aircraft under part 121 or part 135 of this chapter unless the name of the certificate holder who is operating the aircraft, or the air carrier or operating certificate number of the certificate holder who is operating the aircraft, is legibly displayed on the aircraft and is clearly visible and readable from the outside of the aircraft to a person standing on the ground at any time except during flight time. The means of displaying the name on the aircraft and its readability must be acceptable to the Administrator.
[Doc. No. 28154, 60 FR 65913, Dec. 20, 1995, as amended by Amdt. 119-3, 62 FR 13253, Mar. 19, 1997]
§ 23.2515 Electrical and electronic system lightning protection. An airplane approved for IFR operations must meet the following requirements, unless an applicant shows that exposure to lightning is unlikely: ( a ) Each electrical or electronic system that performs a function, the failure of which would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane, must be designed and installed such that— ( 1 ) The function at the airplane level is not adversely affected during and after the time the airplane is exposed to lightning; and
( 2 ) The system recovers normal operation of that function in a timely manner after the airplane is exposed to lightning unless the system's recovery conflicts with other operational or functional requirements of the system.
( b ) Each electrical and electronic system that performs a function, the failure of which would significantly reduce the capability of the airplane or the ability of the flightcrew to respond to an adverse operating condition, must be designed and installed such that the system recovers normal operation of that function in a timely manner after the airplane is exposed to lightning.
§ 147.5 Application requirements. ( a ) To be issued a certificate or rating under this part, an applicant must demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this part.
( b ) An application for a certificate and rating to operate an aviation maintenance technician school must include the following: ( 1 ) A description of the facilities, including the physical address of the applicant's primary location for operation of the school, and any additional fixed locations where training will be provided, and the equipment and materials to be used at each location;
( 2 ) A description of the manner in which the school's curriculum will ensure the student has the knowledge and skills necessary for attaining a mechanic certificate and associated ratings under subpart D of part 65 of this chapter;
( 3 ) A description of the manner in which the school will ensure it provides the necessary qualified instructors to meet the requirements of § 147.19; and
( 4 ) Any additional information necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this part.
( c ) An application for an additional rating or amended certificate must include only the information required by paragraph (b) of this section that is necessary to substantiate the reason for the additional rating or change sought.
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)
***Proposed Site*** October 2010 

### HORTON IRON AND META L Wilmington , North Carolina
New Hanover County

 **Site Location :**  The Horton Iron and Metal property occupies a total of 38 acres and is currently operated as a metal recycl ing facility. The east border of the s ite is the Northeast Cape Fear River. The area intended for NPL listing is the portion of the Horton property which was historically operated as a phosphate fertilizer manufacturing facility, along with sediments in two boat slips located on the Cape Fear River.

 **Site History:**
From 1911 to 1949, American Agricultural Chemical Company operated a phosphate fertilizer manufacturer with a lead

acid chamber fertilizer plant. Naco Fertilizer Company continued the fertiliz er operations from 1949 to 1954. During the 1960s and 1970s, Horton conducted ship

- breaking operations and metal salvage of World War II Liberty Ships in the two boat slips.

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:**

Because of fertilizer manufacturing operati ons, the soil, ground water

, and boat slip sediments are contaminated with high levels of arsenic and lead. As a result of ship

- breaking operations, petroleum products, p olynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), heavy meta ls , and asbestos have been detected in soil and slip sediments.

 **Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment :**  The Cape Fear R iver is a commercial and recreational fishery and is also home to two federally endangered species. PCBs, lead, arsenic, cadmium

, and mercury in boat

- slip sediments are above EPA ecological sediment screening values. Ground water is contaminated with lead and arsenic above EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Act M aximum C ontaminant L evels (MCLs) and poses a threat of discharge to the river.

 **Response Activities (to date):** Several investigations have been conducted by EPA at the s ite.

 **Need for NPL Listing:**
The S tate of North Carolina referred th e site to EPA because of the extent of soil contamination and the contamination in the Cape Fear River . EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state

.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information avail able at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, i ncluding general information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs ca n be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxf aq.html or by telephone at 1

- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted Wesolowski, Chief Executive
Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon
Holdings Corporation.

/s/ Ted Wesolowski

Ted Wesolowski
Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2003
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 12,
2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Human Genome
Sciences, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001, in the following Registration Statements:

       (1)     Registration Statement Number 33-79020 on Form S-8
       (2)     Registration Statement Number 33-79022 on Form S-8
       (3)     Registration Statement Number 333-85319 on Form S-3
       (4)     Registration Statement Number 333-96387 on Form S-3
       (5)     Registration Statement Number 333-33252 on Form S-3
       (6)     Registration Statement Number 333-36384 on Form S-3
       (7)     Registration Statement Number 333-44798 on Form S-8
       (8)     Registration Statement Number 333-45272 on Form S-3
       (9)     Registration Statement Number 333-46298 on Form S-8
       (10)    Registration Statement Number 333-47292 on Form S-3
       (11)    Registration Statement Number 333-66670 on Form S-8




                                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, Virginia
March 28, 2002
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

!• il; , 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive 

Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and 

Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

DOT-OST-1995-272 

formerly 

Docket 49233 

STATUS REPORT 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: July 30, 2010. 

Respectfully submitted. 

Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Dayton Lehman, Jr. 

Deputy Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

_/^A/ — 

'wif 

Senior Tr; 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 30th day of July, 2010, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By Personal Service 

The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 

WSO//0 

.u4
# Official Journal C 24A/2 Fe

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 24A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 502 February 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 24A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 502 February 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 024A/01 | NOTICE TO READERS | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2007/C 024A/01

NOTICE TO READERS

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2007/C 024A/02 | Corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AST/16-25/06 to constitute a reserve of assistants (AST1) with Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovak citizenship in the secretarial field (OJ C 172 A of 25.7.2006) | 3 |

Corrigenda

2007/C 024A/02

Corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AST/16-25/06 to constitute a reserve of assistants (AST1) with Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovak citizenship in the secretarial field (OJ C 172 A of 25.7.2006)

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10976]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MORRIS K. UDALL SCHOLARSHIP AND EXCELLENCE IN NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL 
POLICY FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Board of Trustees of the Morris K. Udall Scholarship & 
Excellence in National Environmental Policy Foundation will hold a 
meeting beginning at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 2000 at the offices 
of the U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution, 110 South 
Church, Ste. 3350, Tucson, AZ 85701.
    The matters to be considered will include (1) A report on the U.S. 
Institute of Environmental Conflict Resolution; and (2) A report from 
the Udall Center for Studies and Public Policy; and (3) Program 
Reports. The meeting is open to the public.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher L. Helms, 110 South 
Church, Ste. 3350, Tucson, Arizona 85701. Telephone: (520) 670-5608.
Dated this 25th day of April, 2000.
Christopher L. Helms.
[FR Doc. 00-10976 Filed 4-28-00; 10:18 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-FN-M