# AGENCY:

 United States International Trade Commission. 

# ACTION:

 Scheduling of expedited five-year reviews concerning the countervailing duty and antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic acid from China and India. 

# SUMMARY:

                         The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty and antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic acid from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Recent amendments to the Rules of Practice and Procedure pertinent to five-year reviews, including the text of subpart F of part 207, are published at 63 F.R. 30599, June 5, 1998, and may be downloaded from the Commission's World Wide Web site at                         *http://www.usitc.gov/​rules.htm.*

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

 January 7, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Debra Baker (202-205-3180), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server                         *http://www.usitc.gov*).                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

                    On January 7, 2000, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group responses to its notice of institution (64 FR 53412, October 1, 1999) were adequate and the respondent interested party group responses were inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting full reviews. [1]                                          Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. [2] 

## Staff Report

A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on April 17, 2000, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's rules. 

## Written Submissions

                    As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution, [3]                                          and any party other than an interested party to the reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are due on or before April 20, 2000, and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to these five-year reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the reviews by April 20, 2000. However, should Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce's final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means.                 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. 

## Determinations

The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules. 

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 12, 2000.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's web site.                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Commissioner Okun did not participate in this phase of the five-year reviews.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                             The Commission has found the response submitted by NFC to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-1094 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P