alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 99-2**

 

 

155Otis Street

Northborough,MA 01532-2414

508-351-2520

508-393-1231(fax)

 

**LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T**

 

 

April 1, 2002

 

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 ofRegulation S-X, Bertucci’s Corporation has obtained a letter of representationfrom Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”) stating that the January 2, 2002 auditwas subject to their quality control system for the U.S. accounting andauditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement wasconducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriatecontinuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability ofnational office consultation. Availability of personnel at foreign affiliatesof Andersen is not relevant to this audit.

 

Very truly yours,

 
| Bertucci’s Corporation                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |
| /s/ Kurt J. Schnaubelt                                   |   |
|                                                     |
| Kurt J. Schnaubelt                                       |
| Senior Vice President –  Finance and Administration |

 

----
### SERVED: OCTOBER 24, 2012

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

### l[lll WASHINGTON, 

### DC 

## 25

In 

### the Matter of: FAA Docket 

### No.:
WESTOVER CORPORATION, FAA.Region: Western-Pacific Judge 

### Richard C. Goodwin


### · Respondent. FDMS No.: FAA-2012-0200 FAA Case 

### No.:2010WP700145


## ORDER GRANTING SUJSIITUTIONOF C:QUNSEL



### TinS COURT, having.reviewed the above and foregoing 

### Substitution of

### Counsel. and being. fully 

### advised inthe premises, hereby 

### approves same as an Order 

### ofthe Court. 

### DONE TillS 

### )<f{A"--day

## ~f {J1_.J1vfJ;/i/?----;1.0l2. 

### BY THE TlUBUNAL:

# 612~C-~r4-**~<I** 

### CHAfLD C' t (}DoD

### wt N

### A-~ 1M.;·"" i 

### {ira

## K 1/ Q. 

### Lc:u-u**~&.j** C..SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

David A. Strom, 

### Respondent's Counsel 3515 South Tamarac Drive, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80237 TEL: 303-355-4999 ONE COPY

Courtney Adolph, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7.4 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7128 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, 

### Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0200 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24455 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:05:13 Desc: MainDocument Page 1 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24455 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:05:13 Desc: MainDocument Page 2 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24455 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:05:13 Desc: MainDocument Page 3 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24455 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:05:13 Desc: MainDocument Page 4 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24455 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:05:13 Desc: MainDocument Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Fomnento Económico Mexicano, S.A. de C.V. (the Company ), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: June 29, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ José Antonió Fernández       
|                     |  |  |  | José Antonió Fernández           
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer          
|                     |  | 
|Dated: June 29, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Javier Astaburuaga Sanjines  
|                     |  |  |  | Javier Astaburuaga Sanjines      
|                     |  |  |  | Finance and Strategic Development
Editorial Note on Part 183
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 183.53 Procedures manual. No ODA Letter of Designation may be issued before the Administrator approves an applicant's procedures manual. The approved manual must: ( a ) Be available to each member of the ODA Unit;
( b ) Include a description of those changes to the manual or procedures that may be made by the ODA Holder. All other changes to the manual or procedures must be approved by the Administrator before they are implemented.
( c ) Contain the following: ( 1 ) The authorized functions and limitations, including the products, certificates, and ratings;
( 2 ) The procedures for performing the authorized functions;
( 3 ) Description of the ODA Holder's and the ODA Unit's organizational structure and responsibilities;
( 4 ) A description of the facilities at which the authorized functions are performed;
( 5 ) A process and a procedure for periodic audit by the ODA Holder of the ODA Unit and its procedures;
( 6 ) The procedures outlining actions required based on audit results, including documentation of all corrective actions;
( 7 ) The procedures for communicating with the appropriate FAA offices regarding administration of the delegation authorization;
( 8 ) The procedures for acquiring and maintaining regulatory guidance material associated with each authorized function;
( 9 ) The training requirements for ODA Unit personnel;
( 10 ) For authorized functions, the procedures and requirements related to maintaining and submitting records;
( 11 ) A description of each ODA Unit position, and the knowledge and experience required for each position;
( 12 ) The procedures for appointing ODA Unit members and the means of documenting Unit membership, as required under § 183.61(a)(4) of this part;
( 13 ) The procedures for performing the activities required by § 183.63 or § 183.65 of this part;
( 14 ) The procedures for revising the manual, pursuant to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section; and
( 15 ) Any other information required by the Administrator necessary to supervise the ODA Holder in the performance of its authorized functions.
Editorial Note on Part 139
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

§ 139.111 Exemptions. ( a ) An applicant or a certificate holder may petition the Administrator under 14 CFR part 11, General Rulemaking Procedures, of this chapter for an exemption from any requirement of this part.
( b ) Under 49 U.S.C. 44706(c), the Administrator may exempt an applicant or a certificate holder that enplanes annually less than one-quarter of 1 percent of the total number of passengers enplaned at all air carrier airports from all, or part, of the aircraft rescue and firefighting equipment requirements of this part on the grounds that compliance with those requirements is, or would be, unreasonably costly, burdensome, or impractical. ( 1 ) Each petition filed under this paragraph must— ( i ) Be submitted in writing at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption;
( ii ) Set forth the text of §§ 139.317 or 139.319 from which the exemption is sought;
( iii ) Explain the interest of the certificate holder in the action requested, including the nature and extent of relief sought; and
( iv ) Contain information, views, or arguments that demonstrate that the requirements of §§ 139.317 or 139.319 would be unreasonably costly, burdensome, or impractical.
( 2 ) Information, views, or arguments provided under paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall include the following information pertaining to the airport for which the Airport Operating Certificate is held: ( i ) An itemized cost to comply with the requirement from which the exemption is sought;
( ii ) Current staffing levels;
( iii ) The current annual financial report, such as a single audit report or FAA Form 5100-127, Operating and Financial Summary;
( iv ) Annual passenger enplanement data for the previous 12 calendar months;
( v ) The type and frequency of air carrier operations served;
( vi ) A history of air carrier service;
( vii ) Anticipated changes to air carrier service;
( c ) Each petition filed under this section must be submitted in duplicate to the— ( 1 ) Regional Airports Division Manager and
( 2 ) Federal Docket Management System, as specified under 14 CFR part 11.
[Doc. No. FAA-2000-7479, 69 FR 6424, Feb. 10, 2004; 72 FR 68475, Dec. 5, 2007]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA—03529]

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Cerplex, Corvallis, Oregon. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

NAFTA—03529; Cerplex, Corvallis, Oregon (April 14, 2000)

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 14th day of April, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-10580  Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
§ 141.26 Training agreements. ( a ) A training center certificated under part 142 of this chapter may provide the training, testing, and checking for pilot schools certificated under this part and is considered to meet the requirements of this part, provided— ( 1 ) There is a training agreement between the certificated training center and the pilot school;
( 2 ) The training, testing, and checking provided by the certificated training center is approved and conducted under part 142;
( 3 ) The pilot school certificated under this part obtains the Administrator's approval for a training course outline that includes the training, testing, and checking to be conducted under this part and the training, testing, and checking to be conducted under part 142; and
( 4 ) Upon completion of the training, testing, and checking conducted under part 142, a copy of each student's training record is forwarded to the part 141 school and becomes part of the student's permanent training record.
( b ) A pilot school that provides flight training for an institution of higher education that holds a letter of authorization under § 61.169 of this chapter must have a training agreement with that institution of higher education.
[Doc. No. FAA-2010-0100, 78 FR 42379, July 15, 2013]
# C_2009197EN.01S00301.xml

| 21.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 21 August 2009, in Official Journal of the European Union C 197 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Fifth supplement to the 27th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,2003 (the “Form 10-KSB”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, Bernard H. Clineburg,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)           the Form 10-KSB fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in the Form10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-KSB.

 

 
| Date:  March 29, 2004 |   | /s/ Bernard  H. Clineburg                                              |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Bernard H.  Clineburg  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### § 25.1107 Inter-coolers and after-coolers.

Each inter-cooler and after-cooler must be able to withstand any vibration, inertia, and air pressure load to which it would be subjected in operation.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. ER00-1874-001]

Take notice that on April 6, 2000, the New England Power Pool Participants Committee filed an amendment to its filing dated March 13, 2000 in the above-referenced docket.

The NEPOOL Participants Committee states that copies of this filing have been sent to the New England state governors and regulatory commissions and the Participants in the New England Power Pool. 

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before May 4, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10562 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 121.695 Disposition of load manifest, dispatch release, and flight plans: Domestic and flag operations. ( a ) The pilot in command of an airplane shall carry in the airplane to its destination— ( 1 ) A copy of the completed load manifest (or information from it, except information concerning cargo and passenger distribution);
( 2 ) A copy of the dispatch release; and
( 3 ) A copy of the flight plan.
( b ) The certificate holder shall keep copies of the records required in this section for at least three months.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19226, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-178, 47 FR 13316, Mar. 29, 1982; Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2616, Jan. 26, 1996]
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

#### § 21.125 [Reserved]
#### Socrates Glays *v.*A Raft of Pine Lumber, etc.

A raft of lumber is not a ■water-craft, within the contemplation of tire statute regulating watercrafts, navigating the waters within or hordering upon this State.

Special Term. — On demurrer to answer. This was an action under the water-craft law, instituted against “ a raft of pine lumber without a name, navigating the waters within and bordering upon the State of Ohio,” to recover for an injury to the plaintiff’s flat-boat, in consequence of the improper navigation of a raft of pine lumber. The defendant, by its owner, put in an answer denying that the raft was a water-craft, or, as such, was liable to seizure under a warrant of attachment, and alleges that the lumber, without any propelling power being attached, was floated from the head waters of the Allegheny to Cincinnati for market, and was separated into distinct platforms temporarily, so as to be conveniently taken apart wherever a market could be found. A demurrer was filed to the answer, contending that supposing all these facts to be true, they did not show that the raft was not a water-craft.

*King, Anderson & Sage,*for plaintiff.

*Lincoln, Smith & Warnock,*for defendant.

Spencer, J.

I suppose that the very term “water-craft” implies some degree of skill and adaptation for the purposes of navigation in the manufacture of the craft, and could not properly be applied to a number of logs put temporarily together, to be brought into market, without any reference to their use in navigation, for the purpose of trade or commerce.

Demurrer overruled, and action dismissed.
EXHIBIT 1 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23482-1 Filed:02/03/23 Entered:02/03/23 17:38:41 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 2
Puerto Rico's revenues come in strong

bondbuyer.com

January 3, 2023 Tuesday

Copyright 2023 SourceMedia LLC d/b/a Arizent All Rights Reserved

Section: Vol. 1; No. 1

Length: 353 words

Byline: Robert Slavin

Body

Puerto Rico's September and October net revenues came in 12.3% above projections.

The net revenues were 0.2% above those of September and October of 2021, despite the impact of Hurricane 

Fiona in September, the Puerto Rico Treasury Department reported.

The hurricane led to a several-day power outage. Beyond its immediate economic effects, the department allowed 

residents and businesses to postpone payments of several taxes to Dec. 15, which also depressed collections 

compared to what they otherwise would be.

Inteligencia Econmica President Gustavo Vlez said, "Clearly,the economic datashows a stableeconomy supported 

by the reconstruction funds(Federal Emergency Management Agency and Community Development Block Grant), 

the remaining pandemic liquidity, strong manufacturing activity, stable retail, and healthy tourism activity.

"The labor market is still growing, a clear positive indicator of the effects of the income tax credit implemented in 

2022 and the increase of the minimum wage," Vlez said. "Even though inflation is still high, consumers are showing 

some kind of resiliency to keep buying cars and other durable goods."

For July to October net revenues of $2.951 billion were 8.2% above projections but 2.4% below those for the same 

months of 2021.

In the four months, the categories with the biggest haul were individual income taxes ($625 million), corporate 

income taxes ($564 million), sales and use tax ($522 million), and foreign corporation excise tax ($503 million). The 

tax categories with the biggest exceedances compared to projections in dollar terms were corporate ($125 million) 

and individual income taxes ($102 million).

In the four-month period, the Law 154 foreign corporation tax had the biggest shortfall compared to the budgeted 

projection ($90 million). This was because the taxhas since been replaced by a different tax, and, Treasury said, 

corporations were shifting their tax liability to the new tax period.

Due to Fiona, the Treasury allowed postponement of payments of individual and corporate taxes, sales and use 

taxes on imported merchandise for resale and on prepared foods.

https://www.bondbuyer.com/news/puerto-ricos-revenues-come-in-strong

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23482-1 Filed:02/03/23 Entered:02/03/23 17:38:41 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               Consent of Independent Auditors

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-82779) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Plan and the
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Overture Services, Inc., (Form S-8 No.
333-30062) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Plan of Cadabra Inc., assumed by
Overture Services, Inc., (Form S-8 No. 333-36230) pertaining to the 1999 Stock
Award Plan and 1999 Executive Stock Award Plan of AuctionRover.com, Inc.,
assumed by Overture Services, Inc., (Form S-8 No. 333-42848) pertaining to the
1998 Stock Plan and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Overture Services,
Inc., (Form S-8 No. 333-58410) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Plan of Overture
Services, Inc. and (Form S-8 No. 333-84132) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Plan of
Overture Services, Inc., of our report dated January 30, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Overture Services, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Los Angeles, California
February 24, 2003