alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.15 Application for type certificate. ( a ) An application for a type certificate is made on a form and in a manner prescribed by the FAA.
( b ) An application for an aircraft type certificate must be accompanied by a three-view drawing of that aircraft and available preliminary basic data.
( c ) An application for an aircraft engine type certificate must be accompanied by a description of the engine design features, the engine operating characteristics, and the proposed engine operating limitations.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14564, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-40, 39 FR 35459, Oct. 1, 1974; Amdt. 21-67, 54 FR 39291, Sept. 25, 1989; Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53385, Oct. 16, 2009; Doc. No. FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 21-101, 83 FR 9169, Mar. 5, 2018]
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending October 31, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Ryan, Chief
Executive Officer, President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)    The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





April
      5, 2010
            /s/Christopher J. RyanChristopher
      J. RyanChief
      Executive Officer, President,Secretary
      and General Counsel
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: PELI POPOVICH HUNT, 

Debtor.

______________________________

PELI POPOVICH HUNT, individual and 

Trustee, 

Appellant, 

 v. 

ELISSA D. MILLER, Chapter 7 Trustee; et 

al., 

Appellees.

No. 14-55776 

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-02705-MMM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2017**

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Peli Popovich Hunt appeals pro se from the district court’s order affirming 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 5 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-55776 

the bankruptcy court’s order granting the chapter 7 trustee’s motion to sell real 

property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the 

district court’s decision on appeal from the bankruptcy court and apply the same 

standards of review applied by the district court. In re Thorpe Insulation Co., 677

F.3d 869, 879 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court had jurisdiction to approve the sale of the real property 

because an order approving the sale of estate property is enumerated as a core 

bankruptcy proceeding that bankruptcy judges are empowered to hear and 

determine. See 11 U.S.C. § 157(b). Hunt’s interest in the property became 

property of the bankruptcy estate upon the filing of her bankruptcy petition. See 11 

U.S.C. § 541(a)(1); Turner v. Cook, 362 F.3d 1219, 1225-26 (9th Cir. 2004) (all 

legal or equitable interests of a debtor in property become property of the 

bankruptcy estate upon the commencement of a bankruptcy case). 

Contrary to Hunt’s contention, the trustee’s motion was timely noticed. 

Hunt was not entitled to the additional three days provided by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 

9006(f) because the deadline to oppose the trustee’s motion was fixed by the 

scheduled hearing date, and not the date of service. See Bankr. C.D. Cal. R. 9013-

1(f) (setting a party’s deadline to oppose a noticed motion).

To the extent Hunt challenges the bankruptcy court’s order as the 

representative of a separate legal entity, the appeal is dismissed because “a non-
3 14-55776 

lawyer ‘has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself.’” Johns 

v. County of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 877 (9th Cir. 1997) (quoting C.E. Pope 

Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987)).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief or arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. 

Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We reject Hunt’s contentions that the bankruptcy court and district court 

demonstrated bias.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.39 Flight test instrument calibration and correction report. ( a ) Each applicant for a normal, utility, acrobatic, commuter, or transport category aircraft type certificate must submit a report to the FAA showing the computations and tests required in connection with the calibration of instruments used for test purposes and in the correction of test results to standard atmospheric conditions.
( b ) Each applicant must allow the FAA to conduct any flight tests that he finds necessary to check the accuracy of the report submitted under paragraph (a) of this section.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14564, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-59, 52 FR 1835, Jan. 15, 1987]
Fw: OR DEQ Comments on the Pesticide General Permit

Jennifer Chan to: Jack Faulk 01/27/2010 08:43 AM

----- Forwarded by Jennifer Chan/DC/USEPA/US on 01/27/2010 08:43 AM -----

From: "MOORE Beth" <MOORE.Beth@deq.state.or.us>

To: Jennifer Chan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Virginia Garelick/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jordan 

Page/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "FULTS Janet E" <Janet.E.Fults@state.or.us>, "LIEBE Annette" <LIEBE.Annette@deq.state.or.us>

Date: 01/26/2010 04:34 PM

Subject: OR DEQ Comments on the Pesticide General Permit

Attached are some comments put together for EPA’s consideration on the pesticide general permit

(January 14, 2010 version).  Thank you for the opportunity to review.

Beth Moore

General Permits Coordinator

DEQ WQ-Surface Water Management

Phone: (503) 229-6402

Fax: (503) 229-6037
##### 



(LVFH LOGO) Exhibit 10.4*  Form 20F 2004 Las Vegas From Home.com
April 15, 2005 Via Email:
ag@windowscasino.comag@casinocash.com International Interactive Ventures
PO Box 35, Tefen Industrial Park
Migdal Tefen,
Israel, 24959 Attn: Andrew G. Szabo
          President Dear Andrew,  Re:
    
    Loan Agreement dated June 15, 2004 between
Las Vegas From Home.com Entertainment Inc. (LVFH) andInternational Interactive Ventures (International)
(the Loan Agreement) In respect to the Loan Agreement, it is our understanding that you have verbally communicated to
our President and CEO, Jake Kalpakian, that in consideration for the early repayment of the Loan on
March 15, 2005, International has decided and agreed to forever forgive all the outstanding and
future bonus payments that are payable pursuant to the Loan Agreement, and that the Loan Agreement
is cancelled and of no further force or effect, and that LVFH and Action Poker Gaming Inc., shall
be deemed to have fulfilled all of their obligations to International pursuant to the Loan
Agreement. If our understanding is accurate, then please indicate Internationals agreement by signing and
dating at the bottom of this letter and after doing so, please kindly fax it to (604) 681-9428. Yours sincerely,
LAS VEGAS FROM HOME.COM ENTERTAINMENT INC. Bedo H.
Kalpakian Bedo H. Kalpakian
Chairman BK/pk I, Andrew G. Szabo, President of International Interactive Ventures, hereby acknowledge
receipt of this letter, and hereby confirm that I, on behalf of International, understand, accept
and agree with the contents of this letter.       Las Vegas From Home.com Entertainment Inc.6thFloor, 1199 West Hastings Street,Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6E 3T5Tel: (604) 681-0204 Fax: (604) 681-9428Website: www.lvfh.com email: info@lvfh.com




---



##### 



Las Vegas From Home.com Entertainment Inc.
6th Floor, 1199 West Hastings Street,
Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6E 3T5
Tel: (604) 681-0204 Fax: (604) 681-9428
Website: www.lvfh.com email: info@lvfh.com
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.97 Approval of major changes in type design. ( a ) An applicant for approval of a major change in type design must— ( 1 ) Provide substantiating data and necessary descriptive data for inclusion in the type design;
( 2 ) Show that the change and areas affected by the change comply with the applicable requirements of this subchapter, and provide the FAA the means by which such compliance has been shown; and
( 3 ) Provide a statement certifying that the applicant has complied with the applicable requirements.
( b ) Approval of a major change in the type design of an aircraft engine is limited to the specific engine configuration upon which the change is made unless the applicant identifies in the necessary descriptive data for inclusion in the type design the other configurations of the same engine type for which approval is requested and shows that the change is compatible with the other configurations.
[Amdt. 21-40, 39 FR 35459, Oct. 1, 1974, as amended by Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53387, Oct. 16, 2009; Amdt. 21-96, 77 FR 71695, Dec. 4, 2012]
§ 27.1019 Oil strainer or filter. ( a ) Each turbine engine installation must incorporate an oil strainer or filter through which all of the engine oil flows and which meets the following requirements: ( 1 ) Each oil strainer or filter that has a bypass must be constructed and installed so that oil will flow at the normal rate through the rest of the system with the strainer or filter completely blocked.
( 2 ) The oil strainer or filter must have the capacity (with respect to operating limitations established for the engine) to ensure that engine oil system functioning is not impaired when the oil is contaminated to a degree (with respect to particle size and density) that is greater than that established for the engine under Part 33 of this chapter.
( 3 ) The oil strainer or filter, unless it is installed at an oil tank outlet, must incorporate a means to indicate contamination before it reaches the capacity established in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 4 ) The bypass of a strainer or filter must be constructed and installed so that the release of collected contaminants is minimized by appropriate location of the bypass to ensure that collected contaminants are not in the bypass flow path.
( 5 ) An oil strainer or filter that has no bypass, except one that is installed at an oil tank outlet, must have a means to connect it to the warning system required in § 27.1305(r).
( b ) Each oil strainer or filter in a powerplant installation using reciprocating engines must be constructed and installed so that oil will flow at the normal rate through the rest of the system with the strainer or filter element completely blocked.
[Amdt. 27-9, 39 FR 35462, Oct. 1, 1974, as amended by Amdt. 27-20, 49 FR 6849, Feb. 23, 1984; Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34213, Sept. 2, 1988]
#### § 145.101 General.

A certificated repair station must provide housing, facilities, equipment, materials, and data that meet the applicable requirements for the issuance of the certificate and ratings the repair station holds.
§ 25.1193 Cowling and nacelle skin. ( a ) Each cowling must be constructed and supported so that it can resist any vibration, inertia, and air load to which it may be subjected in operation.
( b ) Cowling must meet the drainage and ventilation requirements of § 25.1187.
( c ) On airplanes with a diaphragm isolating the engine power section from the engine accessory section, each part of the accessory section cowling subject to flame in case of fire in the engine power section of the powerplant must— ( 1 ) Be fireproof; and
( 2 ) Meet the requirements of § 25.1191.
( d ) Each part of the cowling subject to high temperatures due to its nearness to exhaust system parts or exhaust gas impingement must be fireproof.
( e ) Each airplane must— ( 1 ) Be designed and constructed so that no fire originating in any fire zone can enter, either through openings or by burning through external skin, any other zone or region where it would create additional hazards;
( 2 ) Meet paragraph (e)(1) of this section with the landing gear retracted (if applicable); and
( 3 ) Have fireproof skin in areas subject to flame if a fire starts in the engine power or accessory sections.
#### § 1300.19 Assignment or transfer of loans.

Neither the loan documents nor the guarantee of the Board, or any interest therein, may be modified, assigned, conveyed, sold or otherwise transferred by the lender, in whole or in part, without the prior written approval of the Board.
§ 125.505 Repairs assessment for pressurized fuselages. ( a ) No person may operate an Airbus Model A300 (excluding the -600 series), British Aerospace Model BAC 1-11, Boeing Model 707, 720, 727, 737 or 747, McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8, DC-9/MD-80 or DC-10, Fokker Model F28, or Lockheed Model L-1011 beyond the applicable flight cycle implementation time specified below, or May 25, 2001, whichever occurs later, unless operations specifications have been issued to reference repair assessment guidelines applicable to the fuselage pressure boundary (fuselage skin, door skin, and bulkhead webs), and those guidelines are incorporated in its maintenance program. The repair assessment guidelines must be approved by the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office for the type certificate for the affected airplane. ( 1 ) For the Airbus Model A300 (excluding the -600 series), the flight cycle implementation time is: ( i ) Model B2: 36,000 flights.
( ii ) Model B4-100 (including Model B4-2C): 30,000 flights above the window line, and 36,000 flights below the window line.
( iii ) Model B4-200: 25,500 flights above the window line, and 34,000 flights below the window line.
( 2 ) For all models of the British Aerospace BAC 1-11, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,000 flights.
( 3 ) For all models of the Boeing 707, the flight cycle implementation time is 15,000 flights.
( 4 ) For all models of the Boeing 720, the flight cycle implementation time is 23,000 flights.
( 5 ) For all models of the Boeing 727, the flight cycle implementation time is 45,000 flights.
( 6 ) For all models of the Boeing 737, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,000 flights.
( 7 ) For all models of the Boeing 747, the flight cycle implementation time is 15,000 flights.
( 8 ) For all models of the McDonnell Douglas DC-8, the flight cycle implementation time is 30,000 flights.
( 9 ) For all models of the McDonnell Douglas DC-9/MD-80, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,000 flights.
( 10 ) For all models of the McDonnell Douglas DC-10, the flight cycle implementation time is 30,000 flights.
( 11 ) For all models of the Lockheed L-1011, the flight cycle implementation time is 27,000 flights.
( 12 ) For the Fokker F-28 Mark, 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,000 flights.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Doc. No. 29104, 65 FR 24126, Apr. 25, 2000; 65 FR 50744, Aug. 21, 2000, as amended by Amdt. 125-36, 66 FR 23131, May 7, 2001; Amdt. 125-40, 67 FR 72834, Dec. 9, 2002; Amdt. 125-46, 69 FR 45942, July 30, 2004. Redesignated by Amdt. 125-53, 72 FR 63412, Nov. 8, 2007; Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 125-68, 83 FR 9174, Mar. 5, 2018]
<TABLE> <S> <C>






<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                           
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                              0000797917
<NAME>                             RAYTECH CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                         U.S. DOLLARS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-29-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    1
   
<CASH>                             8,641
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      32,232
<ALLOWANCES>                       746
<INVENTORY>                        28,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   77,959
<PP&E>                             146,639
<DEPRECIATION>                     84,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     159,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              67,288
<BONDS>                            0
<COMMON>                           5,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                         47,749 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       159,357
<SALES>                            62,895 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   62,895 
<CGS>                              48,200 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      48,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 274  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    7,318  
<INCOME-TAX>                       2,708
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                4,157
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       4,157
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                      1.18



    

</TABLE>
September 18, 2015

Mr. Ross Anderson

927 Gay Street

Longmont, CO 80501

Dear Mr. Anderson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from,

§§ 91.9, 91.103(b)(2), 91.105, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.405, 91.407, 91.409,

91.417 and part 21, Subpart H of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains 

why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2471 on June 26, 2015, 

but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
Exhibit 10(b)

                         CONSENT OF SHEARMAN & STERLING

      We hereby consent to the reference to our firm included in Part A and Part
B of Amendment No. 13 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A (811-7885) of
Quantitative Master Series Trust.

                                                         /s/ Shearman & Sterling
                                                         -----------------------
                                                             Shearman & Sterling

New York, NY
April 29, 2003
No. 16,914.

#### Conzman, Treasurer, *v.*First National Bank of Terre Haute.

Filed May 15, 1894.

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

*A. G. Smith,*Attorney-General, *S. R. Hamill, J. O. Thomas, H. Maxwell*and *D. H. Maxwell,*for appellant.

*J. Jump, J. E. Lamb*and *J. C. Davis,*for appellee.

Coffey, J.

The question involved in this case is the same as the principal question involved in the case of *Jones, Treas.,*v. *Rushville Nat’l Bank,*138 Ind. —, and upon the authority of that case the judgment herein is affirmed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration
 Periodically, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) publishes abstracts of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of the clearance requests submitted to OMB for review, call the HRSA Reports Clearance Office on (301) 443-1129. The following request has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995: Proposed Project: Application for the National Health Service Corps (NHSC) Scholarship Program (OMB No. 0915-0146): Extension The National Health Service Corps (NHSC) Scholarship Program was established to help alleviate the geographic and specialty maldistribution of physicians and other health practitioners in the United States. Under this program, health professions students are offered scholarships in return for service in a federally designated Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA). The Scholarship Program provides the NHSC with the health professionals it requires to carry out its mission of providing primary health care to HPSA populations in areas of greatest need. Students are supported who are well qualified to participate in the NHSC Scholarship Program and who want to assist the NHSC in its mission, both during and after their period of obligated service. Scholars are selected for these competitive awards based on the information provided in the application and during the semistructured personal interview that is conducted by a team of two interviewers who use a structured scoring procedure. Awards are made to applicants that demonstrate a high potential for providing quality primary health care services. The estimated response burden is as follows: Form
Number of respondents
Responses per respondents
Hours per reponse
Total burden hoursApplication
2,000
1
1
2,000Interview
1,100
1
1
1,100Total
3,100


3,100
 Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to: Wendy A. Taylor, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, D.C. 20503. Dated: April 26, 2000. Jane Harrison, Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.


[FR Doc. 00-10930 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160-15-P