alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chapter 3: Affected Environment

US Fish & Wildlife Service

Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge
Jefferson County, CO

February 24, 2002

Nastional Wind Wildfire (0.99 Acre’

Techalogy Center y,  cbmany%4, 900
Februory 24,

wf Wildlire (26 Acres

94 Spring Gasslead
Fire (70 Acres)

INDIANA STREET

1996 Labor Day Grassland
Fire (104 Acres)”

Recent Fire History —_—"  \
) Wittires Pecomber 2003 ‘
[|] Prescibed Burn
(GD _DOE Retained Area (Subject to Change)
Note: Based on known fires between 1993 and 2002.

Figure no. 15

Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00455

- CR

CHRISTOPHER ALLEN GILLETTE

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 362nd District Court of Denton County , Texas Trial Cause No. F

- 2011

- 0669

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consider ed this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 26, 2014
```

                                  Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the annual filing of Meier Worldwide Intermedia, a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10KSB for the period ended October 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
James Meier, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/ James Meier

James Meier
Chief Financial Officer and CEO

March 10, 2003
```
§ 25.1147 Mixture controls. ( a ) If there are mixture controls, each engine must have a separate control. The controls must be grouped and arranged to allow— ( 1 ) Separate control of each engine; and
( 2 ) Simultaneous control of all engines.
( b ) Each intermediate position of the mixture controls that corresponds to a normal operating setting must be identifiable by feel and sight.
( c ) The mixture controls must be accessible to both pilots. However, if there is a separate flight engineer station with a control panel, the controls need be accessible only to the flight engineer.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25716-25717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10955]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2032-001 Wyoming]


Lower Valley Energy; Notice of Availability of Final 
Environmental Assessment

April 27, 2000.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a new license for 
the Strawberry Hydroelectric Project (Project) and has prepared a Final 
Environmental Assessment (FEA). The project is located on Strawberry 
Creek near Bedford, Wyoming, and lies entirely

[[Page 25717]]

within the Bridger National Forest, in Lincoln County, Wyoming.
    On November 24, 1999, the Commission staff issued a draft 
environmental assessment (DEA) for the project and requested that 
comments be filed with the Commission within 30 days. The commenting 
deadline was later extended an additional 66 days. Comments on the DEA 
were filed by the U.S. Forest Service, Wyoming State Engineers Office, 
and Lower Valley and are addressed in this FEA.
    The FEA contains the staff's analysis of the potential 
environmental impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the 
project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would not 
constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the 
quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the FEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Room, Room 2A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. This document may also be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (please call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David O. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10955 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 23.2110 Stall speed. The applicant must determine the airplane stall speed or the minimum steady flight speed for each flight configuration used in normal operations, including takeoff, climb, cruise, descent, approach, and landing. The stall speed or minimum steady flight speed determination must account for the most adverse conditions for each flight configuration with power set at— ( a ) Idle or zero thrust for propulsion systems that are used primarily for thrust; and
( b ) A nominal thrust for propulsion systems that are used for thrust, flight control, and/or high-lift systems.
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

TS

- ZF 02 NT

Continuation pages

PMN Pages 8 –

Section II.A.1.a

- 1

- PMN Page 8 – Section II.A.1.a Other Manufacturing Sites

{

}

PMN Page 8 – Section II.A.1.a Other Processing Sites

{

}
c#:23118-2 Filed:12/19/22 Entered:12/20/22 18:00:05 Desc:

Envelope Page 1 of 1
UseofDIDesktop®Data(DCNSGE00520)inEPARulemaking1/12/2015AanalysisorDataFile RelativeDCNs DescriptionDrillinginfoResponseFullDatasetSGE00520(actaulrawdatafile)andSGE00724.A05(containsthefullrawdatafile)ThisisthefulldatasetwedownloadedinJanuary2012.Itincludesa"resourcetype"and"consolidatedformation"fieldthatERGassignedtoeachwellrecord.Confidential.FracFocusAnalysisSGE00724.A04AnalysisperformedbyERGwherewelinkedFracFocuswellrecordstoDIDesktop.WeusedtheformationanddrilltypeinfofromDIDesktoptofurtheranalyzeFracFocusdata.ThelinkwasmadebyAPInumber.Copyrighted.NewMexicoFBAnalysisSGE00724.A07Thisisessentiallyasubsetofthe"FracFocus"analysistablebutwillbepublishedseparatelyaswell.Copyrighted.WyomingFBAnalysisSGE00724.A10Thisisessentiallyasubsetofthe"FracFocus"analysistablebutwillbepublishedseparatelyaswell.Copyrighted.NiobraraFBAnalysisSGE00724.A12Thisisessentiallyasubsetofthe"FracFocus"analysistablebutwillbepublishedseparatelyaswell.Copyrighted.
Law Offices of Glenn P. Hannemann
                        ---------------------------------
                                    24 Brena
                            Irvine, California 92620
                                 (714) 544-1912
                               (714) 544-0218 fax


April 15, 2003



T&G2
Mr. James Farinella
65 La Grande Avenue
Berkeley Heights, New Jersey 07222

     RE:  Invoice

FOR SERVICES RENDERED FOR THE CALENDAR QUARTER ENDING MARCH 31, 2003

          FIXED FEE PER RETAINER AGREEMENT:                 $10,000.00

          LESS PAYMENTS RECEIVED:                           $     0.00

          AMOUNT DUE:                                       $10,000.00

Description of Services
-----------------------

     (i)       Numerous  telephone  conferences  with  Mr.  Farinella  regarding
               preparation of and assist in the preparation of Form S-8;

     (ii)      assist in the  identification  and  negotiation of potential cash
               acquisition of target subsidiaries;

     (iii)     conferences with SEC regarding certain promotional companies;

     (iv)      conferences with Mr. Pollack regarding financial statements to be
               incorporated in 10-Q; and

     (v)       conferences  with  Mr.  Farinella   regarding   establishment  of
               Employee Stock Option Plan.
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Element 21 Golf Company (the
      "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Nataliya
      Hearn, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer, and John Grippo, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.


Date: November
              14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
              Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D.President
                and Director





Date: November
              14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
              John
              GrippoChief
                Financial Officer
§ 16.225 Public disclosure of evidence. ( a ) Except as provided in this section, the hearing shall be open to the public.
( b ) The hearing officer may order that any information contained in the record be withheld from public disclosure. Any person may object to disclosure of information in the record by filing a written motion to withhold specific information with the hearing officer. The person shall state specific grounds for nondisclosure in the motion.
( c ) The hearing officer shall grant the motion to withhold information from public disclosure if the hearing officer determines that disclosure would be in violation of the Privacy Act, would reveal trade secrets or privileged or confidential commercial or financial information, or is otherwise prohibited by law.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the Registrant) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | August 12, 2009        



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | August 12, 2009
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip R. Yates, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: March 31, 2006

 

 

| By:    | /s/ Philip R. Yates     |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Philip R. Yates         |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

#### § 21.13 Eligibility.

Any interested person may apply for a type certificate.

[Amdt. 21-25, 34 FR 14068, Sept. 5, 1969]
§ 135.81 Informing personnel of operational information and appropriate changes. Each certificate holder shall inform each person in its employment of the operations specifications that apply to that person's duties and responsibilities and shall make available to each pilot in the certificate holder's employ the following materials in current form: ( a ) Airman's Information Manual (Alaska Supplement in Alaska and Pacific Chart Supplement in Pacific-Asia Regions) or a commercial publication that contains the same information.
( b ) This part and part 91 of this chapter.
( c ) Aircraft Equipment Manuals, and Aircraft Flight Manual or equivalent.
( d ) For foreign operations, the International Flight Information Manual or a commercial publication that contains the same information concerning the pertinent operational and entry requirements of the foreign country or countries involved.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 395 

AN ACT 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, 

to include a link to a 100 word plain language summary 

of the proposed rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 395 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Account3 ability Through Transparency Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100 WORD SUMMARY TO 

5 REGULATIONS.GOV. 

6 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

9 end; 

10 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

11 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(4) the Internet address of a summary of not 

15 more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, 

16 in plain language, that shall be posted on the Inter17 net website under section 206(d) of the E-Govern18 ment Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) (commonly 

19 known as regulations.gov).’’. 

Passed the Senate June 11, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 395 

AN ACT 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a 

plain language summary of the proposed rule. rule making, to include a link to a 100 word
§ 27.1045 Cooling test procedures. ( a ) *General.* For each stage of flight, the cooling tests must be conducted with the rotorcraft— ( 1 ) In the configuration most critical for cooling; and
( 2 ) Under the conditions most critical for cooling.
( b ) *Temperature stabilization.* For the purpose of the cooling tests, a temperature is “stabilized” when its rate of change is less than two degrees F. per minute. The following component and engine fluid temperature stabilization rules apply: ( 1 ) For each rotorcraft, and for each stage of flight— ( i ) The temperatures must be stabilized under the conditions from which entry is made into the stage of flight being investigated; or
( ii ) If the entry condition normally does not allow temperatures to stabilize, operation through the full entry condition must be conducted before entry into the stage of flight being investigated in order to allow the temperatures to attain their natural levels at the time of entry.
( 2 ) For each helicopter during the takeoff stage of flight, the climb at takeoff power must be preceded by a period of hover during which the temperatures are stabilized.
( c ) *Duration of test.* For each stage of flight the tests must be continued until— ( 1 ) The temperatures stabilize or 5 minutes after the occurrence of the highest temperature recorded, as appropriate to the test condition;
( 2 ) That stage of flight is completed; or
( 3 ) An operating limitation is reached.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34214, Sept. 2, 1988]
EXHIBIT 99.3

|Samson Bélair/Deloitte & Touche, S.E.N.C.Assurance
          and Advisory Services
          1 Place Ville-Marie
          Suite 3000
          Montreal QC H3B 4T9
          Canada

          Tel: (514) 393-7115
          Fax: (514) 390-4113
          www.deloitte.ca
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



COMMENT BY AUDITORS FOR U.S. READERS
ON CANADA-U.S. REPORTING DIFFERENCE

In the United States of America,
reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph
(following the opinion paragraph) when there are changes in accounting principles that
have a material effect on the comparability of the financial statements, such as the
changes described in Note 2 to CGI Group Inc.s consolidated financial statements.
In accordance with Canadian reporting standards, our audit report referred to in
Exhibit 23.1 does not require a reference to such changes in accounting principles in the
auditors report as the changes are properly accounted for and adequately disclosed
in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.

(signed) Samson Bélair/Deloitte & Touche
               Chartered Accountants

Montreal, Canada
February 20, 2003
§ 193.9 Will the FAA ever disclose information that is designated as protected under this part? The FAA discloses information that is designated as protected under this part when withholding it would not be consistent with the FAA's safety and security responsibilities, as follows: ( a ) *Disclosure in all programs.* ( 1 ) The FAA may disclose de-identified, summarized information submitted under this part to explain the need for changes in policies and regulations. An example is the FAA publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking based on your information, and including a de-identified, summarized version of your information (and the information from other persons, if applicable) to explain the need for the notice of proposed rulemaking.
( 2 ) The FAA may disclose information provided under this part to correct a condition that compromises safety or security, if that condition continues uncorrected.
( 3 ) The FAA may disclose information provided under this part to carry out a criminal investigation or prosecution.
( 4 ) The FAA may disclose information provided under this part to comply with 49 U.S.C. 44905, regarding information about threats to civil aviation.
( b ) *Additional disclosures.* For each program, the FAA may find that there are additional circumstances under which withholding information provided under this part would not be consistent with the FAA's safety and security responsibilities. Those circumstances are described in the designation for that program.
# C_2015350EN.01000701.xml

| 22.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 350/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 350/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 31 March 2015

in Case E-21/14

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EEA/EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Directive 2010/30/EU on product information of energy consumption)

(2015/C 350/10)

In Case E-21/14, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — application for a declaration that by failing, within the time prescribed, to adopt and/or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority forthwith of, the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 4 of Chapter IV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, within the time prescribed, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act and under Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 31 March 2015, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 4 of Chapter IV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 4 of Chapter IV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1, and under Article 7 of the Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Nos. 333-105195 and 333-12160) on Form S-3 and Registration Statements (Nos. 333-57091, 333-72456, 333-72458, 333-72460 and 333-112761) on Form S-8 ofour reports dated March 13, 2006, relating to the financial statements of OMI Corporation and management’s report of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of OMI Corporationfor the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPNew York, New York March 13, 2006 

----