alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 125.1 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section, this part prescribes rules governing the operations of U.S.-registered civil airplanes and powered-lift, when those aircraft have a seating configuration of 20 or more passengers or a maximum payload capacity of 6,000 pounds or more when common carriage is not involved.
( b ) The rules of this part do not apply to the operations of aircraft specified in paragraph (a) of this section, when— ( 1 ) They are required to be operated under part 121, 129, 135, or 137 of this chapter;
( 2 ) They have been issued restricted, limited, or provisional airworthiness certificates, special flight permits, or experimental certificates;
( 3 ) They are being operated by a part 125 certificate holder without carrying passengers or cargo under part 91 for training, ferrying, positioning, or maintenance purposes;
( 4 ) They are being operated under part 91 of this chapter by an operator certificated to operate those aircraft under the rules of part 121, 135, or 137 of this chapter, they are being operated under the applicable rules of part 121 or 135 of this chapter by an applicant for a certificate under part 119 of this chapter or they are being operated by a foreign air carrier or a foreign person engaged in common carriage solely outside the United States under part 91 of this chapter;
( 5 ) They are being operated under a deviation authority issued under § 125.3;
( 6 ) They are being operated under part 91, subpart K by a fractional owner as defined in § 91.1001 of this chapter; or
( 7 ) They are being operated by a fractional ownership program manager as defined in § 91.1001 of this chapter, for training, ferrying, positioning, maintenance, or demonstration purposes under part 91 of this chapter and without carrying passengers or cargo for compensation or hire except as permitted for demonstration flights under § 91.501(b)(3) of this chapter.
( c ) This part, except § 125.247, does not apply to the operation of aircraft specified in paragraph (a) of this section when they are operated outside the United States by a person who is not a citizen of the United States.
( d ) The provisions of this part apply to each person on board an aircraft being operated under this part, unless otherwise specified.
( e ) This part also establishes requirements for operators to take actions to support the continued airworthiness of each aircraft.
[Doc. No. 19779, 45 FR 67235, Oct. 9, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 125-4, 47 FR 44719, Oct. 12, 1982; Amdt. 125-5, 49 FR 34816, Sept. 4, 1984; Amdt. 125-6, 51 FR 873, Jan. 8, 1986; Amdt. 125-9, 52 FR 20028, May 28, 1987; Amdt. 121-251, 60 FR 65937, Dec. 20, 1995; Amdt. 125-31, 64 FR 1080, Jan. 7, 1999; Amdt. 125-44, 68 FR 54585, Sept. 17, 2003; Amdt. 125-53, 72 FR 63412, Nov. 8, 2007; Docket No. FAA-2022-1563; Amdt. No. 125-74, 88 FR 48090, July 26, 2023]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL

To the Honorable United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain:

1. The undersigned attorney, who has appeared in this case on behalf of the Puerto Rico 

Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority (“AAFAF”), respectfully notifies the 

Court that he is withdrawing as counsel of record for AAFAF.

2. AAFAF’s Chief Legal Counsel, attorney Mohammad Yassin, who has entered an 

appearance in this matter [DE 2567], will serve as AAFAF’s local counsel. Mr. 

Yassin’s notice of appearance is attached as Exhibit A.

3. The law firm of O’Melveny & Myers LLP will continue to serve as co-counsel of 

record for AAFAF.

 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last four 

(4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales 

Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of 

the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers 

due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2581 Filed:02/23/18 Entered:02/23/18 14:43:59 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

4. The undersigned attorney respectfully requests that the Honorable Court cease to notify 

him of motions, pleadings, papers, and orders in this matter.

WHEREFORE, the undersigned attorney respectfully notifies the Honorable Court of his

withdrawal as counsel for AAFAF, and requests that the Court cease to notify him of motions, 

pleadings, papers, and orders in this matter.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will notify case participants.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 23rd day of February 2018.

/s/ Andrés W. López

Andrés W. López

USDC No. 215311

THE LAW OFFICES OF 

ANDRÉS W. LÓPEZ, P.S.C.

P.O. Box 13909

San Juan, PR 00918

Tel: (787) 294-9508

Fax: (787) 294-9519

Attorney for the Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and 

Financial Advisory Authority 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2581 Filed:02/23/18 Entered:02/23/18 14:43:59 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 8.1



Significant Subsidiaries



The following table sets forth our significant subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005:



|                                                                           |  |                               |  |                  |    
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ---
|Name of Company                                                            |  | Jurisdiction of Establishment |  | Percentage Owned |    
|CIBSA                                                                      |  | Mexico                        |  | 100.0            |    
|Coca-Cola FEMSA                                                            |  | Mexico                        |  | 45.7             | (1)
|Propimex, S.A. de C.V.                                                     |  | Mexico                        |  | 45.7             |    
|Corporación Interamericana de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V. (Panamco)              |  | Mexico                        |  | 45.7             |    
|Panamco México, S.A. de C.V.                                               |  | Mexico                        |  | 45.4             |    
|Panamco Bajío, S.A. de C.V.                                                |  | Mexico                        |  | 43.6             |    
|Panamco de Venezuela, S.A.                                                 |  | Venezuela                     |  | 45.7             |    
|Kristine Oversease, S.A. de C.V. (holding company of Brazilian operations) |  | Mexico                        |  | 38.0             |    
|                                                                           |  |                              
|Emprex                                                                     |  | Mexico                        |  | 100.0            |    
|                                                                           |  |                              
|FEMSA Cerveza                                                              |  | Mexico                        |  | 100.0            |    
|Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.                              |  | Mexico                        |  | 100.0            |    
|Cervezas Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.                                |  | Mexico                        |  | 100.0            |    
|                                                                           |  |                              
|FEMSA Comercio                                                             |  | Mexico                        |  | 100.0            |    
|Cadena Comercial Oxxo, S.A. de C.V.                                        |  | Mexico                        |  | 100.0            |    
|Oxxo Express, S.A. de C.V.                                                 |  | Mexico                        |  | 100.0            |    

---

|(1) | Percentage of capital stock. FEMSA owns 53.6% of the capital stock with full voting rights.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8134

ZACHARY VINCENT MILLER, a/k/a Zachary V. Miller,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

LEVERN COHEN, Warden, Ridgeland Correctional Institution,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (8:08-cv-03729-GRA)

Submitted: April 12, 2010 Decided: June 2, 2010

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zachary Vincent Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Alphonso Simon, Jr., 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, 

South Carolina, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney 

General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Zachary Vincent Miller seeks a certificate of 

appealability to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Miller has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Miller’s 

application for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of UltraStrip Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Rushing III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ JAMESC. RUSHINGIII 
| | James C. Rushing III,  
| | Chief Financial Officer
| |                        

Date:  May 18, 2007







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
'· 

September 14, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Re: Amendment to Exemption No. 12541 

filed pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-

1644-0001. 

Dear Sir or Madam; 

Granite Construction has been granted Exemption numbered 12541 

(hereinafter the Exemption) for the purpose of aerial imaging to monitor and ensure 

safety of secured and controlled environmental construction sites. Granite hereby 

requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow an additional model of 

unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the 

Exemption. 

Granite wishes to operate the Kespry UAS under the same terms and 

conditions contained in the Exemption. Attached hereto, and submitted as a 

confidential document, is the Flight Operations and Procedures Manual for the 

Kespry UAS. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the 

terms of the Exemption. 

Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning 

this request for an amendment to the Exemption. 

Sincerely yours, 

Granite Construction
GenoMed, Inc. Exhibit 10.20



Exhibit 10.20
Scientific Advisory Board Agreement with Geoffrey Boner



                              Contract to Serve on
                       GenoMed's Scientific Advisory Board


Date: December 26, 2002



By my signature below I agree to serve as a member of the Scientific Advisory
Board (SAB) of GenoMed, LLC; (the "Company").


I understand and agree that my commitment to the Company is limited to the
following items:


     a. From time to time, to provide advice, consultation or assistance via
telephone conversation, email or FAX.

     b. To provide GenoMed with my curriculum vitae, of which a brief summary,
subject to my final editorial consent, will be included on GenoMed's website (at
www.genomedics.com).

     I understand and agree that I will not at any time or in any manner,
either directly or indirectly, divulge, disclose, or communicate in any manner
any information that is proprietary to the Company. I will protect such
information and treat it as strictly confidential.

     I understand that, as a member of the Company's Scientific Advisory Board,
I may be invited by the Company to participate in additional projects, such as
helping to explain the company's scientific approach to various funding entities
such as venture capital firms, or to analyze the company's scientific data, but
that these additional projects will be negotiated on a case by case basis, and
that I am in no way obligated to perform such duties by the current contract.


     I understand and agree that the Scientific Advisory Board Contract will be
a five (5) year agreement, but that it can be terminated on 30 days' written
notice by either party for any reason whatsoever. The compensation for my
services will be paid by the Company as follows:


1. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company, exercisable upon
the first anniversary from the date of this Contract.


2. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
second anniversary from the date of this Contract.


3. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
third anniversary from the date of this Contract.


4. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
fourth anniversary from the date of this Contract.


5. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
fifth anniversary from the date of this Contract.




Signed:/s/ Geoffrey Boner                    Date 12/26/02


For GenoMed, Inc:
Signed:/s/ David W. Moskowitz                Date 12/26/02
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Graham Packaging
Holdings Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as supplemented by the Amendment No. 1, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David W. Bullock, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings
Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 2, 2011



By:

/s/ David W. BullockDavid W. BullockChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



49
#### § 26.3 [Reserved]
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-08-00160 -CV Rhe tt We bst e r P e as e , A ppe lla nt

v . Texas Attor ney Ge neral and Jan ell P ease, A ppellees F ROM THE DIST RICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO . 1 2, 38 0, HO NO RAB LE JO HN M. D EL ANE Y , J UDGE PRES ID IN G

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Rhett Webster Pease filed his notice of ap p ea l o n Marc h 14, 2008. The c le rk ’s re c or d wa s file d on J un e 26 , 200 8, thr e e su pp le me nta l cle rk ’s re c or ds we re fi le d o n Augus t 20, 2008, Aug ust 25, 2008, and Dec ember 22, 2008, and the r eporte r’s re cord w as filed on De cembe r 30, 2008. On Fe bruar

y 23, 2009, the c l er kof this Court sent appellant notice that his brief wa s ov e rd ue and tha t hi s a pp e a l w ou ld b e dis mis se d f or wa nt o f p ro se c uti on

if he did no t r e sp on d to thi s Court on or befor e Mar ch 5, 2009. To date, appe llant has not responde d to this C ourt’s notice. Acc ording ly , we dismiss the appea l for wa nt of prosec ution. Tex . R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c) .

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: June 26, 2009
#### § 25.793 Floor surfaces.

The floor surface of all areas which are likely to become wet in service must have slip resistant properties.

[Amdt. 25-51, 45 FR 7755, Feb. 4, 1980]
§ 16.217 Witnesses. ( a ) Each party may designate as a witness any person who is able and willing to give testimony that is relevant and material to the issues in the hearing case, subject to the limitation set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The hearing officer may exclude testimony of witnesses that would be irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious.
( c ) Any witness may be accompanied by counsel. Counsel representing a nonparty witness has no right to examine the witness or otherwise participate in the development of testimony.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.31 Type design. The type design consists of— ( a ) The drawings and specifications, and a listing of those drawings and specifications, necessary to define the configuration and the design features of the product shown to comply with the requirements of that part of this subchapter applicable to the product;
( b ) Information on dimensions, materials, and processes necessary to define the structural strength of the product;
( c ) The Airworthiness Limitations section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness as required by parts 23, 25, 26, 27, 29, 31, 33 and 35 of this subchapter, or as otherwise required by the FAA; and as specified in the applicable airworthiness criteria for special classes of aircraft defined in § 21.17(b); and
( d ) For primary category aircraft, if desired, a special inspection and preventive maintenance program designed to be accomplished by an appropriately rated and trained pilot-owner.
( e ) Any other data necessary to allow, by comparison, the determination of the airworthiness, noise characteristics, fuel efficiency, fuel venting, and exhaust emissions (where applicable) of later products of the same type.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14564, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-27, 34 FR 18363, Nov. 18, 1969; Amdt. 21-51, 45 FR 60170, Sept. 11, 1980; Amdt. 21-60, 52 FR 8042, Mar. 13, 1987; Amdt. 21-68, 55 FR 32860, Aug. 10, 1990; Amdt. 21-70, 57 FR 41368, Sept. 9, 1992; Amdt. 21-90, 72 FR 63404, Nov. 8, 2007; Amdt. No. 21-107, 89 FR 12653, Feb. 16, 2024]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3068-1 Filed:05/16/18 Entered:05/16/18 00:25:47 Desc:

Exhibit 1 - Proof of Claim Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3068-1 Filed:05/16/18 Entered:05/16/18 00:25:47 Desc:

Exhibit 1 - Proof of Claim Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3068-1 Filed:05/16/18 Entered:05/16/18 00:25:47 Desc:

Exhibit 1 - Proof of Claim Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3068-1 Filed:05/16/18 Entered:05/16/18 00:25:47 Desc:

Exhibit 1 - Proof of Claim Page 4 of 4
§ 161.317 Approval or disapproval of proposed restriction. ( a ) Upon determination that an application is complete with respect to at least one of the proposals submitted by the applicant, the FAA will act upon the complete proposals in the application. The FAA will not act on any proposal for which the applicant has declined to submit additional necessary information.
( b ) The FAA will review the applicant's proposals in the preference order specified by the applicant. The FAA may request additional information from aircraft operators, or any other party, and may convene an informal meeting to gather facts relevant to its determination.
( c ) The FAA will evaluate the proposal and issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed restriction and any submitted alternatives, in whole or in part, in the order of preference indicated by the applicant. Once the FAA approves a proposed restriction, the FAA will not consider any proposals of lower applicant-stated preference. Approval or disapproval will be given by the FAA within 180 days after receipt of the application or last supplement thereto under § 161.313. The FAA will publish its decision in the Federal Register and notify the applicant in writing.
( d ) The applicant's failure to provide substantial evidence supporting the statutory conditions for approval of a particular proposal is grounds for disapproval of that proposed restriction.
( e ) The FAA will approve or disapprove only the Stage 3 aspects of a restriction if the restriction applies to both Stage 2 and Stage 3 aircraft operations.
( f ) An order approving a restriction may be subject to requirements that the applicant: ( 1 ) Comply with factual representations and commitments in support of the restriction; and
( 2 ) Ensure that any environmental mitigation actions or commitments by any party that are set forth in the environmental documentation provided in support of the restriction are implemented.