alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.50

                              AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
                             EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                             --------------------

     This is an Amendment, dated April 24, 2001 (the "Amendment") to the
Employment Agreement made as of the 1st day of March, 2000 by and between SELECT
MEDICAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Employer"), and ROCCO A.
ORTENZIO, an individual (the "Employee").


                                  Background
                                  ----------

     A.   The Employer and the Employee executed and delivered that certain
Employment Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000, that certain Amendment No. 1 to
Employment Agreement dated as of August 8, 2000, and that certain Amendment No.
2 to Employment Agreement dated as of February 23, 2001 (as amended, the
"Employment Agreement").  The Employer and the Employee now desire to further
amend the Employment Agreement as hereinafter provided.

     B.   Accordingly, and intended to be legally bound hereby, the Employer and
the Employee agree as follows:

                                   Agreement
                                   ---------

     1.   The phrase "employed by the Employer" which appears in the first
sentence of Section 3.07 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and
restated as follows:

          "an employee, director, consultant, advisor or independent contractor
          of the Employer, or an affiliate of the Employer"


          In addition, the following new paragraph is added to the end of
          Section 3.07:

          "The obligation of the Employer to pay the premiums described in this
          Section 3.07 will survive the termination or expiration of this
          Agreement so long as the Employee continues to serve the Employer, or
          any affiliate of the Employer, as an employee, director, consultant,
          advisor or independent contractor."


     2.   Except as amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall continue in
effect in accordance with its terms.
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date
first above written.

                                        SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION


                                        By: Michael E. Tarvin
                                           -----------------------------
                                                Michael E. Tarvin,
                                                Senior Vice President


                                            Rocco A. Ortenzio
                                           -----------------------------
                                                Rocco A. Ortenzio


                                      -2-
EXHIBIT 31


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Anthony Jurak, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Jurak Corporation World
Wide, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date September 12, 2003                               Signed: /s/ Anthony Jurak
                                                     ---------------------------
                                              Name:  Anthony Jurak
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     principal financial officer


                                       16
CERTIFICATION

I, Ivo Heiden, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Zaxis International Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2011

/s/ Ivo HeidenCEO, CFO and Chairman
Schedule D

List of Main Statutes Preempted by PROMESA

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23506-4 Filed:02/09/23 Entered:02/09/23 17:04:31 Desc:

Schedule D Page 1 of 3
2

List of Main Statutes Preempted by PROMESA1

Statutory Provisions Bondholder Rights and Remedies

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 207 (providing bondholders a right to receivership in certain

circumstances)

2. 22 L.P.R.A. § 208 (providing bondholders certain rights and remedies against PREPA)

Statutory Provisions Concerning Issuance and Terms of Bonds 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 195a-1(o), as amended by Act 17-2019, to require PREB approval of bond

issuances under certain circumstances.

2. Act 101-2020 (providing AAFAF certain approval rights over bond issuances by Puerto

Rico instrumentalities)

Statutes Concerning Means of Implementation of the Plan 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 195a-1(u), as amended by Act 17-2019, to require PREB approval for,

among other things, the sale or transfer of PREPA’s property, and may include

limitations on the creation of subsidiaries or trusts, or the taking of any actions or

measures as are necessary or convenient to exercise PREPA’s power granted under its

enabling act.

Statutes Concerning the Contribution in Lieu of Taxes and subsidies 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 212(b), to establish the Contribution in Lieu of Taxes (CILT) mechanism

by which PREPA compensate municipalities.

2

2. 22 L.P.R.A. § 814, to establish limitations to the future creation of any new electric

power service subsidy, credit, or grant.3

Statutes Concerning Retirement

1. Act 106-2017 (to the extent it does not allow participants in the PREPA ERS to

participate in the Act 106 defined contribution plan).

Statutes enacted prior to PROMESA concerning the Restructuring of PREPA’s debt 

1

 The statutes listed herein are preempted for the reasons and solely to the extent set forth in Exhibit “A” to the 

Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

The Debtor reserves the right to amend this list prior to the entry of the PREPA Confirmation Order.

2 This provision is preempted solely to the extent it could be interpreted to exempt municipalities from paying the 

Legacy Charge. 

3 This provision is preempted solely to the extent it could be interpreted to restrict the creation of a new subsidy for

low-income customers relating to the Legacy Charge. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23506-4 Filed:02/09/23 Entered:02/09/23 17:04:31 Desc:

Schedule D Page 2 of 3
3

1. 22 L.P.R.A § 1054x-1 (establishing the procedure by which the PREB had to determine 

and review the transition charges and adjustment mechanisms).

2. 22 L.P.R.A § 1054b(q) (to the extent, if any, it provides PREB certain approval review 

and approval over PREPA bond issuances under Title III). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23506-4 Filed:02/09/23 Entered:02/09/23 17:04:31 Desc:

Schedule D Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN RE:

EMPRESAS OMAJEDE, INC. 

DEBTOR

CASE NO. 12-10113 ESL

CHAPTER 11

MOTION TO INFORM

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

COMES NOW, The Treasury Department of the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico, through the Secretary of Justice, by the 

undersigned counsel, and respectfully states and prays as 

follows:

1. On October 24, 2016, this Honorable Court granted to 

the Treasury Department fourteen (14) days to show cause why 

they have failed to make the rent and utility payments to the 

debtor, Empresas Omajede, Inc.

2. The Puerto Rico Treasury Department hereby informs to 

this Honorable Court that some payments were issued and sent to 

Debtor. 

3. On November 1, 2016 Treasury Department issued two 

payments: one for the amount of $46,000.00 and other for 

$28,000.00.

4. The appearing party owes some other payments that are 

in process to be issued.

Case:12-10113-ESL11 Doc#:385 Filed:11/14/16 Entered:11/14/16 12:17:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24819-14 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 15:46:48 Desc:

Exhibit 14 - Dkt. 385 of 12-10113 Page 1 of 2
2

2

5. Treasury Department requests fourteen (14) days to 

inform the status of the pending payments. 

WHEREFORE, the Puerto Rico Treasury Department respectfully 

prays for this Honorable Court to take notice of the 

aforementioned and to grant this request for an extension of 

time to inform the status of the pending payments. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this date I filed this 

motion with the Clerk of the Bankruptcy court using the CM/ECF 

system, which will serve notice to all participants. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 14 day of November 2016.

CESAR R. MIRANDA RODRÍGUEZ

Secretary of Justice of the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico

MARTA ELISA GONZÁLEZ Y.

Deputy Secretary of Justice

In Charge of Litigation

WANDYMAR BURGOS VARGAS

U.S.D.C. No. 223502 

Director of Legal Affairs

Federal Litigation Division

//S// MIGDA LIZ RODRÍGUEZ COLLAZO

MIGDA LIZ RODRÍGUEZ COLLAZO, ESQ

U.S.D.C. NO. 224608 

Attorney

Federal Litigation Division

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF THE

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO

P.O. Box 9020192

San Juan, PR 00902-0192

Phone 787 721-5636/8010

Fax. (787) 723-9188

bankruptcyjusticia.gobierno.pr@gmail.com

Case:12-10113-ESL11 Doc#:385 Filed:11/14/16 Entered:11/14/16 12:17:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24819-14 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 15:46:48 Desc:

Exhibit 14 - Dkt. 385 of 12-10113 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------------x

In re 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD OF PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------------x

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION 

PRO HAC VICE OF KATHLEEN M. ST. JOHN

Upon consideration of the Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Kathleen M. St. 

John (the “Application”), it is hereby ORDERED, that the Application is GRANTED. Kathleen 

M. St. John is hereby admitted pro hac vice to appear before this Court in the above referenced 

matter. The Clerk of Court shall deposit the admission fee to the account of Non-Appropriated 

Funds of this Court.

SO ORDERED this ____ day of __________________, 2017.

HONORABLE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

#51869247_v1

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number listed as a 

bankruptcy case number due to software limitations and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax 

identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); and (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation 

(“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:333-2 Filed:06/14/17 Entered:06/14/17 18:20:16 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 1 of 1
#### James Quinten SMITH et ux *v.*Theta C. VILLARREAL

5-6094

486 S.W. 2d 671

Opinion delivered November 27, 1972

*Smith, Williams, Friday, Eldredge ir Clark,*by: *Michael G. Thompson,*for appellant.

*Kenneth Coffelt,*for appellee.

J. Fred Jones, Justice.

This is an appeal by James Quinten Smith and his wife from a judgment of the Pulaski County Circuit Court setting aside a jury verdict and granting a new trial in a suit for personal injuries and property damage.

The facts of record indicate that Mrs. Smith and Mrs. Villarreal sustained personal injuries and damage to the automobiles they were driving when the automobiles collided headon while traveling in opposite directions on state Highway 294. Mrs. Villarreal filed suit against Mr. and Mrs. Smith and the Smiths counterclaimed against Mrs. Villarreal, each alleging that their alleged damages were the proximate result of the other’s negligence. There was conflicting evidence on the primary issue before the trial court as to the relative position of the two automobiles on the highway in relation to their proper lanes for traffic at the time of impact.

*483The jury returned a verdict for Mr. and Mrs. Smith upon the complaint of Mrs. Villarreal and in favor of Mrs. Villarreal on the counterclaim of Mr. and Mrs. Smith. Mrs. Villarreal as well as Mr. and Mrs. Smith moved to set aside the respective verdicts against them as being not sustained by sufficient evidence (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27T901 [Repl. 1962]), and both parties prayed for a new trial as to the issues against the other. The trial court granted both motions and entered an order setting aside the verdicts as to both parties and granting a new trial on all issues. Mr. and Mrs. Smith have appealed and designate the point upon which they rely as follows:

> “The trial court invaded the province of the jury and abused its discretion in setting aside the verdicts in this case.”

Both sides argue that the preponderance of the evidence is in their favor in this case. The trial judge went to considerable length in reviewing the evidence and in stating his reasons for concluding that the jury verdicts were not sustained by sufficient evidence. We have examined the entire record and find no evidence that the trial court abused its discretion in setting aside the verdicts and granting a new trial in this case.

We have held that the granting of a new trial addresses itself to the sound discretion of the trial court and that this court will not reverse unless it appears that the trial court has abused its discretion. Our holdings on this point have been so often and consistent we consider it unnecessary to quote from former opinions. See, however, *Richardson*v. *State,*47 Ark. 562; *Blackwood*v. *Eads,*98 Ark. 304, 135 S. W. 922; *Mo. Pac. Rd. Co.*v. *Brewer,*193 Ark. 754, 102 S. W. 2d 538; *Worth James Constr. Co.*v. *Herring,*242 Ark. 156, 412 S. W. 2d 838; *Mo. Pac. R.R. Co.*v. *Clark,*246 Ark. 824. 440 S. W. 2d 198: *Dorev*v. *McCoy,*246 Ark. 1244, 422 S. W. 2d 202; *Heil*v. *Roe,*253 Ark. 139, 484 S.W. 2d 889.

The judgment is affirmed.
Consent of Independent Auditors', Deloitte & Touche LLP.



Exhibit 10(i) 
 
  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 
  
 To the Board of Directors of  
 MML Bay State Life Insurance Company 
  
 We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to Registration Statement No. 33-76920 on Form N-4 of our report dated
February 17, 2003 for the MML Bay State Variable Annuity Separate Account 1— LifeTrust, and of our report dated March 6, 2003, on MML Bay State Life Insurance Company (which report on MML Bay State Life Insurance Company expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to the use of statutory accounting practices and the adoption, effective January 1, 2001, of certain statutory accounting practices as a result of the State of Connecticut Insurance
Department’s adoption of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual, which practices differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America) appearing in
the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Statement of Additional Information. 
  
 DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP 
  
 Hartford, Connecticut 
 April 24, 2003
#### MORGAN et al. v. STRATTON et al.

No. 32667.

Oct. 7, 1947.

*185 P. 2d 458.*

C. H. Bowie, of Pauls Valley, for plaintiffs in error.

*238Haskell Paul, of Pauls Valley, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to require the county superintendent to conduct an election authorizing the annexation of territory to a school district. The superintendent answered that the election had been held and the annexation authorized and ordered before the cause was commenced. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the superintendent appeals. On March 6, 1947, he filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendants in error have not filed a brief and have offered no excuse for their failure to do so. Under such circumstances, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded, with directions. Goolby v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498; Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056.

Reversed, with directions to vacate the judgment entered for plaintiffs and dismiss the cause.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.
§ 121.647 Factors for computing fuel required. Each person computing fuel required for the purposes of this subpart shall consider the following: ( a ) Wind and other weather conditions forecast.
( b ) Anticipated traffic delays.
( c ) One instrument approach and possible missed approach at destination.
( d ) Any other conditions that may delay landing of the aircraft.
For the purposes of this section, required fuel is in addition to unusable fuel.
#### § 125.135 Oil lines and fittings in designated fire zones.

Oil lines and fittings in each designated fire zone must comply with § 125.157.
§ 217.10 Instructions. ( a ) Reports required by this section shall be submitted to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics in a format specified in accounting and reporting directives issued by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics' Director of Airline Information.
( b ) The detailed instructions for preparing Schedule T-100(f) are contained in appendix A to this part.
[53 FR 46294, Nov. 16, 1988, as amended at 54 FR 7183, Feb. 17, 1989; 60 FR 66722, Dec. 26, 1995; 67 FR 49223, July 30, 2002; 75 FR 41583, July 16, 2010; DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15926, Apr. 16, 2019]