alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Brad Poiriez Air Pollution Control Officer Imperial CountyAir Pollution Control District 150 S. 9th Street El Centro, CA 92243 (760) 482-4606 Fax 353-9904 

# lyon

# dellbasell I I Ill II

Re: Rule 101 Update: Proposed Exclusion of Propylene Carbonate (PC) and TertiaryButyl Acetate (TBAC) to the Definition ofa Volatile Organic Compound (VOC).
Dear Mr. Poiriez, As a supplier of both TBAC (CAS# 540-88-5) and PC (CAS# 108-32-7) Lyondell Chemical Companyfully supports the Imperial CountyAir Pollution Control Districts' (APCD) proposal to exclude them from the definition ofa VOC in Rule 101; Definitions. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) removed TBAC from the definition ofa VOC in December 2004 and PC in January 2009, based on their negligible photochemical reactivity (tropospheric ozone-forming potential). In addition to their negligible contribution to ozone formation, neither compound is a greenhouse gas, stratospheric ozone depleter, fine particulate precursor, environmentally persistent, or toxic. TBAC and PC are excellent replacements for a numberofreactive VOCs, ozonedepleting, and toxic solvents. They are currently used in a variety ofindustrial coatings, inks, adhesives, and cleaners throughoutthe US and Canada. Adding TBAC and PC to the list ofcompounds excluded from the VOC definition in Rule 101 will harmonize the list ofVOC-exempt compounds in Imperial County and the rest ofthe US and Canada. Itwill also streamline the regulatory process and accelerate the phasing-out ofsolvents with highertoxicity and ozone-forming potential from products and operations in Imperial County.
Wethank the APCD their careful consideration ofthe information Lyondell Chemical has presented since 2006 and for listening to the needs ofthe American Coatings Association, its members, and the manufacturers of Imperial County. Sincerely,

Daniel B. Pourreau Technical Advisor Elizabeth Castro Manager, State GovernmentAffairs

cc via email: Monica Saucier, Dave Darling (ACA) Page 1of1
§ 142.63 Privileges. A certificate holder may allow flight simulator instructors and evaluators to meet recency of experience requirements through the use of a qualified and approved flight simulator or qualified and approved flight training device if that flight simulator or flight training device is— ( a ) Used in a course approved in accordance with subpart B of this part; or
( b ) Approved under the Advanced Qualification Program for meeting recency of experience requirements.
•

•

•

SPA 20

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 173

Land Disposal Restrictions; Treatment Standards for

Spent Potliners from Primary Aluminum

Reduction (K088); Final Rule

63 FR 51254-51267

September 24, 1998

(RCRA Cluster IX, HSWA provisions)

STATE ANALOG IS:

FEDERALREQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRACITATION ANALOGOUS STATECITATION

WAC173-303- EQUIV- LESS MORE BROADER STRIN- STRIN- ALENT GENT GENT IN SCOPE

PART 268 - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS

SUBPART C - PROHIBITIONS ON LAND DISPOSAL

WASTE SPECIFIC PROHIBffiONS-SPENT ALUMINUM POTLINERS; REACTIVE; AND

CARBAMATE WASTES

replace "October 8,

1997" with "September 140(2)(a)

21, 1998"; replace "this 268.39(c) Incorporated by X

waste" with "these reference.

wastes"

SUBPARTD-TREATMENTSTANDARDS

APPLICABILITY OF TREATMENT STANDARDS

in the entry for K088,

correct "Acenaphthene"

to "Acenaphthalene";

correct

"Benz(a)anthracene" to

"Benzoiajanthracene";

in nonwastewaters 268.40ffable 140(2)(a) X

column for Arsenic,

replace "5.0 mgll

TCLP" with "26.1

rug/kg"; remove

"Fluoride" and its

corresponding data

September 24, 1998 - Page 1 of 1 CL173.wp - Revised: 9110199

Printed: 12119/0 I
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3724

AN ACT

To amend section 220 of the National Housing Act

to make a technical correction to restore allowable increases in the maximum mortgage limitsfor FHA-insured mortgages for multifamilyhousing projects to cover increased costs of installing a solar energy system or residential energy conservation measures.

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3724

AN ACT

To amend section 220 of the National Housing Act to make

a technical correction to restore allowable increases in

the maximum mortgage limits for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing projects to cover increased

costs of installing a solar energy system or residential

energy conservation measures.
2

•HR 3724 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Efficient Hous5 ing Technical Correction Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

7 Section 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(V) of the National Housing

8 Act (12 U.S.C. 1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(V)) is amended by

9 striking ‘‘with respect to rehabilitation projects involving

10 not more than five family units,’’.

Passed the House of Representatives February 3,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3907 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3907

 To provide that all critical access hospitals are eligible for loans 
     under the paycheck protection program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 8, 2020

  Ms. Collins introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that all critical access hospitals are eligible for loans 
     under the paycheck protection program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``PPP for Critical Access Hospitals 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS IN THE PAYCHECK 
              PROTECTION PROGRAM.

    Section 7(a)(36)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
636(a)(36)(D)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(vii) Inclusion of critical access 
                        hospitals.--During the covered period, any 
                        nonprofit organization that is a critical 
                        access hospital (as defined in section 1861(mm) 
                        of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
                        1395x(mm))) shall be eligible to receive a 
                        covered loan, regardless of the status of such 
                        a hospital as a debtor in a case under chapter 
                        11 of title 11, Unites States Code, or the 
                        status of any debts owed by such a hospital to 
                        the Federal Government.''.
                                 <all>
```
STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION
                             OF THE INCORPORATOR OF
                               PTN WIRELESS, INC.

     The undersigned incorporator of PTN Wireless, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 108 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, that:

     1.   The certificate of incorporation of said corporation was filed with
          the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on February 21, 2001.

     2.   The By-laws annexed hereto are hereby adopted as and for the By-laws
          of said corporation.

     3.   Peter Klamka is hereby elected as the director of said corporation to
          hold office until the first annual meeting of stockholders or until
          his successors are elected and qualified:

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this instrument as of the date when these
actions were so taken this 21st day of February 21, 2001.


                                             /s/  Hank Gracin
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Hank Gracin
Exhibit 15

















May 4, 2010








Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F. Street, N.W.


Washington, D.C. 20549














Commissioners:





We are aware that our report dated May 4, 2010 on our review of interim financial information of Unit Corporation for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and included in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No.’s 33-19652, 33-44103, 33-49724, 33-64323, 33-53542, 333-38166, 333-39584, 333-135194 and 333-137857).





Very truly yours,





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Tulsa, Oklahoma
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3734 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building located at Fifth and Richardson Avenues in Roswell, New Mexico, as the ‘‘Joe 

Skeen Federal Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 3734 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building located at Fifth and Richardson 

3 Avenues in Roswell, New Mexico, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Joe Skeen Federal Building’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be 

9 a reference to the ‘‘Joe Skeen Federal Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3948 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3948

   To amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on 
 Native Children Act to extend the deadline for a report by the Alyce 
Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2020

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on 
 Native Children Act to extend the deadline for a report by the Alyce 
Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALYCE SPOTTED BEAR AND WALTER SOBOLEFF COMMISSION ON NATIVE 
              CHILDREN REPORT.

    Section 3(f) of the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff 
Commission on Native Children Act (Public Law 114-244; 130 Stat. 987) 
is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``3 
years'' and inserting ``5 years''.
                                 <all>
```
The Honorable Cynthia Holcomb Hall, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth * Circuit, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-1278EM

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Matthew Cox, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: November 19, 1998

Filed: November 27, 1998

_____________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and HALL, Circuit Judges. *

_____________ PER CURIAM. Matthew Cox appeal s his conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Cox raises several arguments related to the admission of evidence offered by the Government and th e prosecuto r's closing argument. Cox also raises an argument about his sentence
. Because Cox 's appeal involves the straightforward application of settled principles of law, we conclude that a discussion of the issues by the panel will serve no useful-2- - purpose. We have carefully considered Cox's arguments and find them to be without merit. We thus affirm Cox's conviction and sentence. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Dear Air Director: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D .C. 20460


## MAY 2 22015 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

This letter is to notify your state that today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, Gina McCarthy signed a final action notifying states that their state implementation plans (SIPs) are not fully consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA) and recent court decisions concerning startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) operations
. This action and related documents can be found at http://www.epa.gov/air/urbanair /sipstatus/emissions
.html. This action responds to a Petition for Rulemak.ing filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning the treatment ofexcess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those emissions are treated in SIP provisions that the EPA previously approved. The EPA is calling for 36 states, including your state, to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health and ensure consistency with the CAA and the EPA's current SSM policy
. In response to this SIP call action, your state will need to correct specific SSM provisions in your state plan as specified in the final notice. The CAA allows a maximum of 18 months from the issuance ofthe final action to submit a SIP revision. Therefore, your revised SIP submission is due to the EPA by November 22, 2016. As you know, air pollution emitted during SSM periods may adversely affect the health ofpeople in neighboring and downwind communities. These changes to state plans will provide necessary environmental protection, and will give industry and the public more certainty about requirements that apply during these periods
. The EPA will continue to work closely with you to provide assistance and ensure this process is as efficient as possible. Ifyou have questions or need assistance, please contact your EPA regional office or you may contact Anna Marie Wood, Director ofthe Air Quality Policy Division, Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards, at (919) 541

-3604 or at wood.annafa),epa.gov or Phil Lorang, at (919) 541-5463 or at lorang.phil@epa.gov. Sincerely,

Janet G
. McCabe Acting Assistant Administrator

Internet Address (URL) • hl1p://www.epa.gov Recyc led/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Global Crossing Limited (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean F.H.P.
Mandeville, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/    Jean F.H.P. Mandeville
|Jean F.H.P. Mandeville       
|Chief Financial Officer      
|March 16, 2006
#### Rath Estate

*James R. Caiola,*for petitioner.

December 10, 1956.

Taxis, P. J.,

Catharine Rath and Gertrude Torok filed their “Petition for Citation for Appeal of Probate of Will,” and aver that Joseph F. Rath, their father, died October 27,1956, a resident of the borough of Conshohocken, leaving to survive him the two petitioners.

*729Petitioners aver that on October 31, 1956, the Register of Wills of Montgomery County granted letters of administration c. t. a. to Marie Smith, after admitting to probate a last will and testament dated October 3, 1950, that no contest proceedings were instituted before the register of wills.

Petitioners then aver that the will was the result of undue influence and that decedent lacked testamentary capacity. The prayer of the petition asks the court “to award a Citation directed to Marie Smith, the Administratrix C. T. A. and sole beneficiary under the Will that an Appeal be allowed from the probate by the Register of Wills and the Register of Wills *be requested*to certify the record and issue to the Orphans’ Court after a bond has been filed by the petitioners in an amount to be fixed by the Register of Wills.” (Italics supplied.)

Petitioners do not set forth any statutory authority for their prayer but unquestionably section 207 of the Register of Wills Act of June 28,1951, P. L. 638, is the basis for the petition.

Section 207 provides in part: “Whenever a caveat shall be filed or a dispute shall arise before the register concerning the probate of a will, the grant of letters *or the performance of any other function by the register,*he may certify, *or the court upon petition of any party in interest may direct*the register at any stage of the proceedings to certify, the entire record to the court, which shall proceed to a determination of the issue in dispute . . .” (Italics supplied.)

The comments of the Joint State Government Commission to section 207 provide that this section includes “the substance of sections 18 and 19 of the 1917 Act, combined into a single abbreviated section as a matter of style.” It would appear, therefore, that section 207 of the Register of Wills Act of 1951 does not in fact *730change the provisions of sections 18 and 19 of the 1917 Act.

In the present case in decreeing probate, the register of wills acted as a judge; the admission of the will to probate was a judicial act: Sebik’s Estate, 300 Pa. 45, 47; Szmahl’s Estate, 335 Pa. 89, 92, 93. By the decree of probate the register has fully performed his judicial function; there is therefore no “dispute” before him “concerning the probate of a will,” nor any dispute concerning “the performance of any other function by the register.” Where, as here, a decree of probate has been entered by the register, section 207 has no application. In such circumstances, the proper procedure to attack the validity of the will and its probate is by appeal pursuant to section 208 of the Register of Wills Act of 1951.

And now, December 10, 1956, the petition is dismissed without prejudice.
EXHIBIT D

Summary of Segal Consulting Blended Hourly Rates 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-4 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 1 of 2
Exhibit D

Summary of Segal Consulting Blended Hourly Rates

Blended Hourly Rate Billed in

this Fee Application

Senior Vice President $659

VP & Actuary $539

Actuary $422

Consultant $440

Analyst $298

All Employees $464

Case Name: In re Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al.

Case Number:   17 BK 3283‐LTS

Applicant's Name:   Segal Consulting

Date of Application:   March 19, 2018

Interim or Final:   Interim

Timekeeper Category

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-4 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      15**
 
 
 
 
 
 May
      3,
      2007
 
 
 Securities
      and Exchange Commission
 450
      Fifth
      Street, N.W.
 Washington,
      D.C. 20549
 
 
 
 
 Commissioners:
 
 We
      are
      aware that our report dated May 3, 2007 on our review of interim financial
      information of Unit Corporation for the three month periods ended March 31,
      2007
      and 2006 and included in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 is incorporated by reference in its registration
      statements on Form S-8 (File No.’s 33-19652, 33-44103, 33-49724, 33-64323,
      33-53542, 333-38166, 333-39584, 333-135194 and 333-137857) and Form S-3 (File
      No.’s 333-104165, 333-83551, 333-99979 and 333-128213).
 
 Very
      truly yours,
 
 /s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP
§ 1204.1102 Responsibilities. ( a ) Consistent with this subpart and applicable statutes, Center Directors of NASA installations and the Executive Director for Headquarters Operations, over which the United States has exclusive or concurrent legislative jurisdiction, are delegated the authority to establish specific vehicular and pedestrian traffic rules and regulations for their installations; to specify maximum punishments for violating such rules and regulations; and to issue citations, including District Court Violation Notices to persons who violate such rules and regulations.
( b ) All persons on a NASA Center or component facility are responsible for compliance with locally established vehicular and pedestrian traffic rules and regulations.
[79 FR 54903, Sept. 15, 2014, as amended at 80 FR 70152, Nov. 13, 2015]
§ 171.213 Reports. The owner of each facility to which this subpart applies shall make the following reports, at the times indicated, to the Federal Aviation Administration Regional Office for the area in which the facility is located: ( a ) Record of meter readings and adjustments (Form FAA-198). To be filled out by the owner or his maintenance representative with the equipment adjustments and meter readings as of the time of commissioning, with one copy to be kept in the permanent records of the facility and two copies to the appropriate Regional Office of the Federal Aviation Administration. The owner must revise the form after any major repair, modification, or retuning, to reflect an accurate record of facility operation and adjustment.
( b ) Facility maintenance log (FAA Form 6030-1). This form is a permanent record of all equipment malfunctioning met in maintaining the facility, including information on the kind of work and adjustments made, equipment failures, causes (if determined), and corrective action taken. The owner shall keep the original of each report at the facility and send a copy to the appropriate Regional Office of the Federal Aviation Administration at the end of the month in which it is prepared.
( c ) Radio equipment operation record (Form FAA-418), containing a complete record of meter readings, recorded on each scheduled visit to the facility. The owner shall keep the original of each month's record at the facility and send a copy of it to the appropriate Regional Office of the Federal Aviation Administration.
[Doc. No. 10116, 35 FR 12716, Aug. 11, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 171-10, 40 FR 36110, Aug. 19, 1975]
# Lawrence R. 

# DiGiansante Attorney at Law 984 Morris Park Avenue Bronx, N.Y. 10462 Phone(718)822-0707 April 9, 2015 Fax (718) 904-1 030 e-mail: Ldcrimlaw@optonline.net

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS 

# RECEIVED
Ms. ShariceJefferson Federal Aviation Administration WilburWright Building- Suite 2W 100 600 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

# APR 102015 

# HEARING DOCf<ET

Re: In the Mattera(Philip Putter, FDMS No. FAA 2015-0210 Dear Ms. Jefferson: I am writing regarding my client, Mr. Philip Putter. Please allowthis correspondence to serve as my request to withdrawthe above reference matterfrom you Hearing Docket. The matter has been settled between the parties Ithankyour Court for its courtesy. Please contact my office ifyou need any further information to process this request. 

# £a::
Lawrence DiGiansante LD:rb cc: Judith L. Vaughan via email