alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RE: Exemption data for ATR42

From: Steve Slotte To: jamoritz 12/31/2013 07:19 AM Cc: Gaetano Sciortino, Paul Siegmund, Richard Beckwith, Mark Forseth

Mr. Moritz,

I will close the docket. Advisory circular (AC) 25 -16 is still an active AC, however, please coordinate compliance activities related to 25.869(a)(4) for the wires that are the subject of the exemption request with the New York ACO.

Best Regards,

Stephen Slotte FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate Airplane and Flightcrew Interface Branch, ANM-111 1601 Lind Ave SW Renton, WA 98057 USA Telephone: 425-227-2315 Facsimile: 425-227-1320

-----"John A. Moritz" <jamoritz@del ta-engineering.com> wrote: -----

To: Steve Slotte/ANM/FAA@FAA From: "John A. Moritz" <jamoritz@delta-engineering.com> Date: 12/30/2013 03:55PM Cc: Paul Siegmund/ANM/FAA@FAA, Ri chard Beckwith/AEA/FAA@FAA, Gaetano Sciortino/ANE/FAA@FAA Subject: RE: Exemption data for ATR42

Mr. Slotte,

I can confirm by test that an internal fire cannot pr opagate to other locations and therefore use the ELOS provided in 25-16.

You can close the docket. Please confirm we can use the ELOS provided in AC 25-16.

A) Enclosed in a case made of metal or other materi al that complies with the flammability requirements of Amendment 25-32 that will either contain an internal fire so that it cannot propagate to other locations or is sufficiently airtight that internal ignition sources cannot cause a fire; or

John A. Moritz ODA Lead Administrator Delta Engineering 13 DRBA Way New Castle County Airport New Castle, Delaware 19720 Office: (302) 325-9337Cell: (302) 521-5139 FAX: (302) 325-9322

From: Steve.Slotte@faa.gov [mailto:Steve.Slotte@faa.gov] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 6:37 PM To: jamoritz@delta-engineering.com Cc: Paul.Siegmund@faa.gov Subject: Re: Exemption data for ATR42

Mr. Moritz,

It appears from our conversations with you, and the data you have sent via email, you believe that you can either directly comply with the requirements of 25.869(a)(4) or show an equivalent level of safety to those requirements. If you are pursui ng the direct compliance/ELOS r oute, then an exemption from the requirements of 25.869(a)(4) would not be necessary.

Can you confirm to me that you wish to withdraw yo ur request? Upon receipt of that confirmation I will close the docket.

Best Regards,

Stephen Slotte FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate Airplane and Flightcrew Interface Branch, ANM-111 1601 Lind Ave SW Renton, WA 98057 USA Telephone: 425-227-2315 Facsimile: 425-227-1320

From: "John A. Moritz" <jamoritz@delta-engineering.com> ANM-111, Airplane & Flight Crew Interface To: Paul Siegmund/ANM/FAA@FAA, Steve Slotte/ANM/FAA@FAA, Date: 12/17/2013 08:53 AM Subject: Exemption data for ATR42

Mr. Siegmund,

Do you also we me to put a copy on the Docket website?

John A. Moritz ODA Lead Administrator Delta Engineering 13 DRBA Way New Castle County Airport New Castle, Delaware 19720 Office: (302) 325-9337 Cell: (302) 521-5139 FAX: (302) 325-9322
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Corey E. Shaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Corey E. Shaker
-------------------------------------
Corey E. Shaker
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 24, 2004
EXHIBIT F

Summary of Jenner & Block LLP Expenses 

Service Description Amount

Audiovisual $3,088.49 

Business Meals $531.62 

Color Copy $1,412.25 

Court Fees $140.00 

In-City Transportation $246.98 

Lexis Research $1,444.05 

Other Professional Services (Marketing Consultant) $45,335.60 

Pacer Charges $2,600.40 

Postage Expense $45.71 

Publications/Books $100.00 

Special Messenger Service $58.42 

Telephone Expense $727.83 

Transcripts - Court Appearance- Deposition $524.49 

UCC Fee $375.00 

UPS $1,754.91 

Westlaw Research $6,304.56 

Witness Fee $900.00 

Travel

Airfare $9,451.07 

Ground Transportation $1,338.28 

Hotel $13,694.27 

Meals $3,582.93 

Parking $209.00 

Rail $791.50 

TOTAL $100,461.26 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2741-6 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 18:57:52 Desc:

Exhibit F Page 1 of 1
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-19 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 18 - PROOF OF CLAIM Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-19 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 18 - PROOF OF CLAIM Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-19 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 18 - PROOF OF CLAIM Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-19 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 18 - PROOF OF CLAIM Page 4 of 4
#### PITTMAN, ET AL. v. THE STATE.

(Decided April 8, 1915.)

Appeal from Washington County Court.

Heard before Hon. D. J. Long.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Metcalf *&*Bull, Respondents, *v.*Mattisons, Appellant.

It is only in clear cases that this court will reverse a judgment for the refusal of a referee to nonsuit the plaintiff when the findings of fact have been approved by the court below.

Porter, J.

If the facts found by the referee were warranted by the evidence, his conclusion of law was correct, and the plaintiffs were entitled to judgment. We are concluded by the findings, unless there was such a failure of proof as to justify us in holding that the referee erred in refusing the motion for a nonsuit. It is only in clear cases that this court exercises the power of reversing a judgment on this ground, when the findings of fact have been approved in the court below. The evidence in the present case was not very satisfactory, but we cannot say that there was an entire absence of proof tending to uphold the conclusions of the referee. We do not, therefore, feel at liberty to disturb the judgment on that ground.

Assuming that the liability of the defendant was to the plaintiffs jointly, the state of their accounts with Bull individually was immaterial, and the evidence offered on that subject was properly excluded. Their demand against him. constituted neither a defense to the action, nor a counterclaim against the respondents. There was no allegation of payment in the answer, and there was no purpose for which the proof offered was available.

The judgment should be affirmed.
Exhibit 10.19




DISSOLUTION
OF NOT RESIDENCIAL RENT AGREEMENT





PARTICULAR
INSTRUMENT OF DISSOLUTION





By this particular instrument of
dissolution, on one side, referred to as LANDLORD, the companyJAIME
FINGERGUT-Engenharia, Comércio
e Industria Ltda. Located
at 1971 Avenida Sete de Setembro, First floor, Corredor da Vitória, CEP 40080-22
– Salvador – Ba. Federal Tax Identity Number 15.221.641/0001-43, State Tax
Identity Number 00658949, and the other part referred to as the TENANT, the
companyQUALYTEXTIL
S/A,located at Rua do
Luxemburgo, Quadra O, Lotes 82/83, District São Caetano, Salvador, Bahia , Zip
Code 41230-000, Tax Identity Number 04.011.170/0001-22,on this act
represented  by his CFOMR. MIGUEL ANTONIO
DO GUIMARÃES BASTOS, of
nationality Brazilian, being married of marital status, who proves his identity
with Identity Card Number 4607520 SSP/BA, CPF Number 125.891.957-53, andMrs.
MÁRCIA CRISTINA VIEIRA DA CONCEIÇÃO ANTUNES, of nationality Brazilian, being
married of marital status   who proves his identity with Identity
card Number 02504273-46 – SSP - Ba,  CPF 507.932.685-91,They
decide to dissolve the contract of not residential rent, established between the
parts





The
TENANT makes on this date the payment of the monthly rent, in compliance with
the established contractual clauses, being allowed to use the property until 08/
21st/2009,
when he will deliver the building in perfect conditions, to the
LANDLORD.





At the
property delivering, the TENANT will pay to the LANDLORD the amount equivalent
to 02 (two) months of rent, for rescission fine purpose, as it is established s
in clause 15 of the Agreement of not Residential Rent





In this
way and at the delivering of the property, each of the LANDLORD and the TENANT
will release and discharge each other from any payment, not having nothing more
to complain and no reason to demand any advantages in connection with the
rescinded Agreement.





In
witness whereof, the parties have caused this dissolution to be executed in
Three (03) copies of equal meaning and form, in the presence of two (02)
witnesses that also signed to reach the legal effects.





Salvador-BA,
July 22 nd, 2009.





By:/s/
Jaime Fingergut


JAIME
FINGERGUT – Engenharia, Comércio e Indústria Ltda.


LOCADOR





By:
                          /s/ Miguel Antonio dos Guimarães Bastos
                          
                          By:
                          /s/ Marcia Cristina Vieira da Conceição AntunesMiguel Antonio dos Guimarães Bastos
                          
                          
                          Marcia Cristina Vieira da Conceição Antunes


QUALYTEXTIL S/A


LOCATÁRIA





WITNESSES





Nome:
              
              Nome:CPF:
              
              CPF:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         118,708
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    136,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               340,692
<PP&E>                                         535,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                 159,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 833,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,106,960
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        54,322
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   833,671
<SALES>                                        339,390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               339,390
<CGS>                                          715,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (9,572)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,831,277)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          89,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  307,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (40,163)
<INVENTORY>                                    204,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               561,293
<PP&E>                                       4,319,633
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,482,532 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,406,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,678,383
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,283
<COMMON>                                        21,191
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,406,499
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (73,153)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,105 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,105
<DISCONTINUED>                                 173,187
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,314,248
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,553,540
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .733
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .733
        

</TABLE>
```

                                                                Exhibit 31.1

I, James Meier, CEO and CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K-SB of Meier Worldwide
Intermedia, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

        c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

        a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

      February 5, 2003                                /s/ James Meier
                                                          James Meier
                                                      Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                                      Financial Officer
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule contains summary
financial   information   extracted  from  the  Registrant's  audited  financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by  reference  to  those  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0001060755
<NAME>
RIDGEWOOD     ELECTRIC    POWER    TRUST     V
       <S>    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>
YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                42,832,241
<SECURITIES>                          27,075,657<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      44,259,870
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        71,735,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    788,113<F2>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                            69,216,738<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          71,735,025
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       3,020,949<F4>
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       2,190,030
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (2,643,662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (2,643,662)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                          (2,643,662)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (2,782)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (2,782)

<FN>
<F1>Investment  in power  project  partnership  and  limited  liability  company
accounted for on equity basis.
<F2>Includes  $1,165,140 due to affiliates.
<F3>Represents  Investor  Shares of  beneficial  interest in Trust with  capital
accounts of  $69,216,738 less  managing  shareholder's  accumulated  deficit of
$099,149.
<F4>Is net of $2,767,348 of interest  income.
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 141.31 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart prescribes: ( 1 ) The personnel and aircraft requirements for a pilot school certificate or a provisional pilot school certificate; and
( 2 ) The facilities that a pilot school or provisional pilot school must have available on a continuous basis.
( b ) As used in this subpart, to have continuous use of a facility, including an airport, the school must have: ( 1 ) Ownership of the facility or airport for at least 6 calendar months after the date the application for initial certification and on the date of renewal of the school's certificate is made; or
( 2 ) A written lease agreement for the facility or airport for at least 6 calendar months after the date the application for initial certification and on the date of renewal of the school's certificate is made.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16347, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 141-9, 62 FR 40907, July 30, 1997]
Section 4 

Documentation that GRIC has Sufficient Legal 

Authority Under Tribal Law to Adopt and Enforce 

the AQMP. 

See Attachment B of TAS: 

+ GRIC Constitution 

+ GRIC Law and Order Code 

+ GRIC Organizational Chart 

+ GRIC Code Title 13 

+ GRIC Financial Management and 

Procurement Policy (April 1 1,2002) 

+ GRIC Air Quality Management Program 

Plan
#### § 142.61 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes the operating rules applicable to a training center certificated under this part and operating a course or training program curriculum approved in accordance with subpart B of this part.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, that:

     -    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     -    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the Corporations financial condition and results of
          operations of the corporation as of the dates and for the periods
          expressed in this quarterly report.


/s/ John J. Remaley
-------------------------------------
John J. Remaley, Chief Executive
Officer

Dated: May 11, 2007


                                       23
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON AMENDED MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Samuel J. Prater, M.D. and Krista G. Handyside, M.D. v. Telicia 

Owens

Appellate case number: 01-21-00264

Trial court case number: 2012-07534

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: August 31, 2022

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the amended motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Julie Countiss_________

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Countiss and Farris.

Date: October 20, 2022
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending April 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Gary Pokrassa, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:





(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








June
      9, 2009
              /s/Gary PokrassaGary
      Pokrassa,Chief
      Financial Officer