alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009007EN.01S00301.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 7/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 7/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.204 Adoption of provisions of one carrier by another carrier.

When one carrier adopts the tariffs of another carrier, the effective and prospective fares of the adopted carrier shall be changed to reflect the name of the adopting carrier and the effective date of the adoption. Further, each adopted fare shall bear a notation which shall reflect the name of the adopted carrier and the effective date of the adoption, provided that any subsequent revision of an adopted fare may omit the notation.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN: SE05916

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Apr-1-2000
<CASH>                                           1,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,264
<INVENTORY>                                     48,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,671
<PP&E>                                         117,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           147
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   179,404
<SALES>                                         70,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,973
<CGS>                                           53,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (25)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,029
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,049
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,049
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66



</TABLE>
§ 133.27 Availability, transfer, and surrender of certificate. ( a ) Each holder of a rotorcraft external-load operator certificate shall keep that certificate and a list of authorized rotorcraft at the home base of operations and shall make it available for inspection by the Administrator upon request.
( b ) Each person conducting a rotorcraft external-load operation shall carry a facsimile of the Rotorcraft External-Load Operator Certificate in each rotorcraft used in the operation.
( c ) If the Administrator suspends or revokes a Rotorcraft External-Load Operator Certificate, the holder of that certificate shall return it to the Administrator. If the certificate holder, for any other reason, discontinues operations under his certificate, and does not resume operations within two years, he shall return the certificate to the responsible Flight Standards office.
[Doc. No. 1529, 29 FR 603, Jan. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 133-9, 51 FR 40708, Nov. 7, 1986; Amdt. 133-11, 54 FR 39294, Sept. 25, 1989; Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 133-16, 83 FR 9174, Mar. 5, 2018]
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
**Title:**Geologic reconnaissance of a  proposed powersite at Lake Grace, Revillagigedo  Island, Southeastern Alaska
SuDoc Number: I 19.3:1211-E
Item  Number: 0620 (online)
CGP System  Number:000973882

Report  | Plate  1
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Publishing Office.

 

Last updated:  September 13,  2017  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
  |
|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 15.9 Investigation and examination.

The FAA may investigate a claim or conduct a physical examination of a claimant. The FAA may request any other Federal agency to investigate a claim or conduct a physical examination of a claimant and provide a report of the investigation or examination to the FAA.
#### ROSS v. THE STATE.

(Decided April 22, 1915.)

Appeal from Walker Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. J. J. Curtis.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 9, 2020

No. 04

- 18

- 00733

- CR

Martin BALLEZA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, T exas

Trial Court No. 2017CR12645

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

The panel has considered Appellant ’s motion for rehearing; the motion is DENIED. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.3.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justic e

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of March, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Cler k of Court
# C o urt o f A ppe a ls

o f th e S ta te o f G e o rg ia

A TLA N TA ,_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The C o u rt o f Appea ls h ereb

y p a s s es the fo llo wi

n g order:

A24 A16 15. AN TON IO LAM OU N T S T RAT T M AN v. T H E S T AT E

.

I n 2023, A nto nio Lamo u nt Strattman entered a nego tiated gu ilty p l e a t o

c riminal d amage to p ro p erty in the sec o nd d egre e and o ther o f f enses and w as
sentenc ed to fiv e years o n pro batio n. I n Ap ril 2024, the trial co u rt rev o k ed Strattman’ s p ro batio n. Pro c e ed ing p ro se, Strattman f iled bo th an ap p lic atio n f o r d isc r etio nary ap p eal a nd a n o t i c e o f ap p eal in the trial c o u rt. T he d irec t ap p eal has d o c k eted as the instant c ase. W e lac k j u risd ic t io n. A p p e al s f ro m p ro batio n rev o c atio n o rd ers mu s t be mad e by ap p lic atio n f o r d i s c retio nary ap p eal. See OCGA § 5

- 6 -35 (a) (5). Thu s , Strattman is no t entitl e d t o

a d irec t ap p eal. M oreo v er, ap p lic atio ns f o r d isc retio nary ap p eal mu st be f iled w ith the

c lerk of the Su p reme Co urt o r t h e C o u rt o f A p p eals. OCGA § 5- 6- 35 (d ). H ere, Strattman f

ile d h i s ap p lic atio n in the su perio r c o u rt, rather than this Co u rt. A c c o rd ingly, this Co u rt lac k s j urisd ic tio n ov er t his ap p e al, w hic h is hereby
D I SM I SSED

. See Bo

yle v

. Sta te , 1 9 0 Ga. A p p

. 7 34, 7 34 (380 SE2d 57 ) (1 9 89 ) (“ The
requ irements o f OCGA § 5- 6

- 35 are j u risd ic tio nal a nd t his [C]o u rt canno t ac c ep t an ap p eal no t mad e in c o mp lianc e therew ith. ” )

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O ffic e , A tla n t a ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r tify t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

. W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. June 14, 2024

06/14/2024
# CISWI reductions from L. Sorrels 19jul12, 2:36pm, modified 21nov13: CISWITables_1-5_-_MACT_Floor_Emission_Reductions_October_19,_2011_rmLSadds7-19-12_21nov13.xlsx
# R. Mason computed select SO2 % reductions such that controlled emissions basically matched the unit totals for the quote MACT-floor unquote values
# Analysis confined to larger PM, NOX and SO2 impacts (> 50 tons reductions) and NO NOX or PM sources in NEI2011v6 as large as baseline in original workbook
# Siginficant SO2 sources still found in 2011NEIv1 and are therefore included for control here
# THIS PACKET EXPORTED FROM: /garnet/home/rhc/2011v6/mk_CONTROL_CISWI_2011v6.sas
05081,,SO2,,92.01,100,100,,,Y,R,880811,47419113,,,,"! ARDomtarIndustries, PB1, Energy recovery unit - Solids, Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General"
05081,,SO2,,92.01,100,100,,,Y,R,880811,47419413,,,,"! ARDomtarIndustries, PB3, Energy recovery unit - Solids, Electrostatic Precipitator"
22031,,SO2,,94.23,100,100,,,Y,R,7225811,80385413,,,,"! LAIPMansfield, 1-78 - No. 1 Power Boiler / EQT005, Energy recovery unit - Solids, Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone), Electrostatic Precipitator"
22031,,SO2,,92.43,100,100,,,Y,R,7225811,80389813,,,,"! LAIPMansfield, 2-78 - No. 2 Power Boiler, Energy recovery unit - Solids, Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone), Electrostatic Precipitator"
22069,,SO2,,60.69,100,100,,,Y,R,7226811,80646813,,,,"! LAInternationalPaperRedRiverMill, EQT011 Hogged Fuel Boiler No. 2, Energy recovery unit - Solids, Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone), Electrostatic Precipitator"
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-76,884-01, WR- 76,884-02 & WR- 76,884-03

EX P ARTE BRANDON K EITH STRAIT, AKA WILLIE L EE S TRAIT, App licant
ON AP P LICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. W366-82126-09-HC, W366-80925- 09-HC & W366- 80926-09-HC

IN THE 366T H DISTRICT COURT F ROM COLLIN COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Tex as C o d e o f Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of t he trial court transmitt ed to thi s Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of burg lary

of a ha bitation a nd one count of attempted burg lary of a ha bitation. He was se ntence d to imprisonment for two terms of ten y ear s and one term of fiftee n year s. The Fifth Court of Appea ls dismiss ed his appea ls. Strait v. State , Nos. 05-10-00549- CR, 05-10-00550- CR & 05-10-00674- CR (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pe t.). Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel failed to advise Applicant that by2

signingand ac ceptingthe plea a g ree ments he would wa ive his rig hts to appeal. The trial c ourt has dete rmined that counse l’s conduct wa s deficie nt and that such de ficient conduct prejudice d Applicant. Relief is grante d. The judgme nts in cause numbers 366-82126-09, 366-80925-09, and 366-80926-09 in the 366 t h District Court of Colli n County are set aside, and Applicant is rema

nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Colli n County
. The trial court shall issue any
nece ssary bench w arr ant within 10 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Te xa s D epar tment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 30, 2013 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I, John A. Kritzmacher, Chief Financial Officer of Global Crossing Limited, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Global Crossing Limited; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date: April 30, 2010



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    John A. Kritzmacher
|John A. Kritzmacher       
|Chief Financial Officer
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 14, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00395-CR

____________

SHAWN BRADLEY ROGERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1337425

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a guilty plea to unauthorized use of a motor vehcile. In 

accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court 

sentenced appellant on April 9, 2012, to confinement for three years in the Institutional 

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of 

appeal. We dismiss the appeal. 

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the 

court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on 
2

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court’s certification. 

See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison.

Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JASON LAWSON , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 18

- 1183

[ June 21, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.85 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Dennis D. Bailey

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 11925

- CF

- 10A

.

Rachael E. Reese of O’Brien Hatfield, P.A

. , Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

M AY , F ORST and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
No s . 04

- 13

- 00052

- CR & 04

- 13

- 00053

- CR Edna Tatiana PENA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No s . 2012CR10627W & 2012CR9404W Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 13, 2013
DISMISSED On January 28 , 2013, we notified the appellant that the trial court’s certification s in these appeal s state that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defe ndant has NO right of appeal.” Additionally, the cl erk’s record contains a written waiver signed by the appellant pursuant to which s he entered a plea of guilty

. The trial court’s judgment also shows that there was a plea bargain agreement, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. Therefore, the trial court’s04

- 13

- 00052

- CR & 04

- 13

- 00053

- CR

- 2

- certification s accurately r eflect that these criminal case s are plea

- bargain case s . See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). In our January 28 , 2013 order, we warned appellant that these appeals would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless amended trial c ourt certifications showing that appellant had the right to appeal were made part of the appellate records. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— S an Antonio 2003, order). No amended trial court certifications hav e been filed. These appeals are, therefore, dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM
Do not publish
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending October 31, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Gary Pokrassa, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:





(1)                 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)                 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








December
      10, 2008
            /s/Gary
      PokrassaGary
      Pokrassa,Chief
      Financial Officer










30
§ 25.858 Cargo or baggage compartment smoke or fire detection systems. If certification with cargo or baggage compartment smoke or fire detection provisions is requested, the following must be met for each cargo or baggage compartment with those provisions: ( a ) The detection system must provide a visual indication to the flight crew within one minute after the start of a fire.
( b ) The system must be capable of detecting a fire at a temperature significantly below that at which the structural integrity of the airplane is substantially decreased.
( c ) There must be means to allow the crew to check in flight, the functioning of each fire detector circuit.
( d ) The effectiveness of the detection system must be shown for all approved operating configurations and conditions.
[Amdt. 25-54, 45 FR 60173, Sept. 11, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 25-93, 63 FR 8048, Feb. 17, 1998]
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.31 Rules and regulations governing passenger fares and services. ( a ) Tariff rules and regulations governing passenger fares and services other than those subject to § 221.30 may be filed electronically in conformity with subpart R. Such filings shall conform to criteria approved by the Department's Office of International Aviation as provided in § 221.180 and shall contain at a minimum the information required by § 221.202(b)(9).
( b ) Applications for special tariff permission may be filed electronically, as provided in § 221.212.
( c ) Tariff publications and applications for special tariff permission covered by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section may be filed in a paper format, subject to the requirements of this part and Department orders.
§ 171.47 Performance requirements. ( a ) The Instrument Landing System must perform in accordance with the “International Standards and Recommended Practices, Aeronautical Telecommunications, Part I, Paragraph 3.1” (Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation) except as follows: ( 1 ) The first part of paragraph 3.1.3, relating to suppression of radiation wholly or in part in any or all directions outside the 20-degree sector centered on the course line to reduce localizer does not apply.
( 2 ) Radiation patterns must conform to limits specified in 3.1.3.3 and 3.1.3.4, but this does not mean that suppression of radiation to the rear of the antenna array to satisfy difficult siting positions (as per 3.1.3.1.4) is not allowed. For example, if a reflector screen for the antenna array is required to overcome a siting problem, the area to the rear of the localizer may be made unusable and should be so advertised.
( 3 ) A third marker beacon (inner marker) is not required.
( 4 ) The frequency tolerance of the radio frequency carrier must not exceed plus or minus 0.002 percent.
( b ) Ground inspection consists of an examination of the design features of the equipment to determine that there will not be conditions that will allow unsafe operations because of component failure or deterioration.
( c ) The monitor is checked periodically, during the in-service test evaluation period, for calibration and stability. These tests, and ground checks of glide slope and localizer radiation characteristics, are conducted in accordance with FAA Handbooks AF P 6750.1 and AF P 6750.2 “Maintenance Instructions for ILS Localizer Equipment” and “Maintenance Instructions for ILS Glide Slope Equipment”.
( d ) Flight tests to determine the facility's adequacy for operational requirements and compliance with applicable “Standards and Recommended Practices” are conducted in accord- ance with the “U.S. Standard Flight Inspection Manual”, particularly section 217.
[Doc. No. 5034, 29 FR 11337, Aug. 6, 1974, as amended by Amdt. 171-9, 38 FR 28557, Oct. 15, 1973]
Sec. 19-1 Applicability. ( a ) *United States air carrier.* Each large certificated U.S. air carrier shall file with the Department, on a monthly basis, Form 41 Schedule T-100 “U.S. Air Carrier Traffic and Capacity Data By Nonstop Segment and On-flight Market,” and summary data as prescribed in this section and in sections 22 and 25 of this part.
( b ) *Foreign (non-U.S.) air carrier:* Each foreign air carrier as required by part 217 of this chapter shall file Form 41 Schedule T-100(f) “Foreign Air Carrier Traffic Data by Nonstop Segment and On-flight Market.” The “Instructions to Foreign Air Carriers for Reporting Traffic Data on Form 41 Schedule T-100(f),” (Instructions-Foreign Air Carriers) are included in the Appendix to § 217.10 of this chapter.
( c ) Reports required by this section shall be submitted to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics in a format specified in accounting and reporting directives issued by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics' Director of Airline Information.
( d ) On-flight market and nonstop segment detail data by carrier shall be made public only as provided in section 19-6.
[53 FR 46305, Nov. 16, 1988; 53 FR 52404, Dec. 28, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 66723, Dec. 26, 1995; 67 FR 49223, July 30, 2002; 75 FR 41583, July 16, 2010]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3103 Filed:05/21/18 Entered:05/21/18 15:25:27 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3103 Filed:05/21/18 Entered:05/21/18 15:25:27 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3103 Filed:05/21/18 Entered:05/21/18 15:25:27 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3