alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, André Imbeau, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of CGI Group Inc.; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: December 23, 2005

/s/ André Imbeau
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24903 Filed:08/16/23 Entered:08/17/23 09:51:00 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24903 Filed:08/16/23 Entered:08/17/23 09:51:00 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24903 Filed:08/16/23 Entered:08/17/23 09:51:00 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3955 

To prohibit no-knock warrants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2020 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit no-knock warrants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for Breonna 

5 Taylor Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON NO-KNOCK WARRANTS. 

7 (a) FEDERAL PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any 

8 other provision of law, a Federal law enforcement officer 

9 (as defined in section 115 of title 18, United States Code) 

10 may not execute a warrant until after the officer provides 

11 notice of his or her authority and purpose. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3955 IS

1 (b) STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGEN2 CIES.—Beginning in the first fiscal year beginning after 

3 the date of enactment of this Act, and each fiscal year 

4 thereafter, a State or local law enforcement agency that 

5 receive funds from the Department of Justice during the 

6 fiscal year may not execute a warrant that does not re7 quire the law enforcement officer serving the warrant to 

8 provide notice of his or her authority and purpose before 

9 forcibly entering a premises. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
# C_2022125EN.01000101.xml

| 18.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2021-2022 SESSION

Sitting of 1 March 2022

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
EXHIBIT 10.4



Summary of Proposed Employment Agreement with Joe M. Allbaugh



On September 9, 2006, our board of directors approved the financial terms of a proposed employment agreement with Mr. Joe M. Allbaugh, one of our directors, to serve as President of Ecosphere Systems, Inc. (ESI), our water filtration subsidiary and appointed Mr. Allbaugh to the board of directors of ESI. As of September 9, 2006, the board of directors of ESI, by unanimous consent, appointed Mr. Allbaugh President of ESI, and approved the terms of the proposed employment agreement.



The key terms of the proposed employment agreement are:



·

A term of two years with an option by us to extend for a third year;

·

An annual salary of $360,000;

·

An 8% commission from all revenue received by Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. (the Company) or ESI from all parties introduced to the Company or ESI by Mr. Allbaugh, such revenue to be paid as collected;

·

A grant of 500,000 non-qualified five-year vested options exercisable at fair market value at the time of grant for Company common stock for each $10,000,000  of sales received by the Company or ESI from introductions made by Mr. Allbaugh;

·

A 4% commission from all consideration received upon the sale of all or any portion of the Company or ESI as a result of introductions made by Mr. Allbaugh;

·

A grant of 500,000 non-qualified five-year vested options exercisable at fair market value at the time of grant for Company common stock for each $10,000,000 of consideration received upon the sale of all or any portion of the Company or ESI as a result of introductions made by Mr. Allbaugh; and

·

A grant of 20% of ESIs outstanding common stock. The shares are not vested, subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and not entitled to receive any dividends, whether in cash or assets of other entities, prior to vesting. At such time during the term of the employment agreement as ESI is able to sell 25% of its equity for at least $10,000,000, the shares shall vest and shall be equal to 20% of outstanding shares after such sale.
March 23, 2015

Mr. Charles Richardson

1225 South McDuffie Street

Anderson, SC 29624

Dear Mr. Richardson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your January 21, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0158), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et 

al., 

Debtors. 

PROMESA Title III. 

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICE 

TO THE HONORABLE BANKRUPTCY COURT: 

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel for and on behalf of creditor MOROVIS 

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER for all purposes in connection with this case. Pursuant to 

Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 3017, and 9010(b) the undersigned hereby requests service of all 

notices, applications, motions, orders, pleadings, reports, plans and disclosure statements filed or 

served in this case, and requests that the name and address of the undersigned be added to all 

mailing matrices in this case. Service may be made and directed as follows: 

 Thomas T. Pennington (B.P.R. #9605) 

Reno & Cavanaugh, PLLC 

424 Church Street, Suite 2910 

Nashville, Tennessee 37129 

Telephone: (615) 866-2322 

Facsimile: (615) 866-2323 

Email: tpennington@renocavanaugh.com 

This notice of appearance and request for notices is submitted for the limited purpose of 

receiving copies of notices, pleadings, judgments, and orders in this case. By submitting this 

notice of appearance and request for notices, MOROVIS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER is 

not consenting to or submitting to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court for any purpose and 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3141 Filed:05/24/18 Entered:05/24/18 15:13:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2 

expressly reserve the right to contest the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and/or to demand a 

jury trial in any matter or proceeding to which MOROVIS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER 

may be a party. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ María Celeste Rodríguez Miranda 

María Celeste Rodríguez Miranda 

D.P.R. Bar No. 213113 

Bufete Rodríguez Miranda, C.S.P. 

P.O. Box 365072 

San Juan, PR 00936-5072 

(787) 408-0808 (tel) 

mcrm100@msn.com 

/s/Thomas T. Pennington 

Thomas T. Pennington* (B.P.R. #9605) 

Reno & Cavanaugh 

424 Church Street, Suite 2910 

Nashville, Tennessee 37129 

(615) 866-2322 (office) 

(615) 866-2323 (fax) 

tpennington@renocavanaugh.com 

*Admitted pro hac vice 

Attorneys for Morovis Community Health 

Center 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3141 Filed:05/24/18 Entered:05/24/18 15:13:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on May 24, 2018, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically. 

Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system to all parties 

indicated on the electronic filing receipt. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s 

electronic filing system. 

/s/Thomas T. Pennington 

Thomas T. Pennington (B.P.R. #9605) 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3141 Filed:05/24/18 Entered:05/24/18 15:13:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
Exhibit
10.2


 


Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002


 


I, Elek Straub, certify that the Form 20-F fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


 


	
  Date: May 9, 2003

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Elek Straub

  
	
   

  	
  Name: 

  	
  Elek Straub

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

  



 


 


I, Dr. Klaus Hartmann, certify that the Form 20-F fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


 


	
  Date: May 9, 2003

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Dr. Klaus Hartmann

  
	
   

  	
  Name: 

  	
  Dr. Klaus Hartmann

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.3****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**     LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. consents to the references to our firm in the form andcontext in which they appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quicksilver Resources Inc. (the“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006. We further consent to the use of informationcontained in our report, as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, setting forth the estimates ofrevenues from the Company’s oil and gas reserves in such Annual Report on Form 10-K. We furtherconsent to the incorporation by reference of such Annual Report on Form 10-K into RegistrationStatement Nos. 333-69496, 333-89204, 333-92196 and 333-130597 on Form S-3 and RegistrationStatement Nos. 333-134430, 333-94387, 333-91526, 333-113617 and 333-116180 on Form S-8 of theCompany.      **LaROCHE PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, LTD.**
cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge Frank Matylinsky Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2
§ 212.11 Issuance of statement of authorization. ( a ) The Department will issue a statement of authorization if it finds that the proposed charter flight, part charter, or wet lease meets the requirements of this part and that it is in the public interest. Statements of authorization may be conditioned or limited.
( b ) In determining the public interest the Department will consider (but not be limited to) the following factors: ( 1 ) The extent to which the authority sought is covered by and consistent with bilateral agreements to which the United States is a party.
( 2 ) The extent to which an applicant foreign air carrier's home country (and, in the case of a long-term wet lease, the lessee's home country) deals with U.S. air carriers on the basis of substantial reciprocity.
( 3 ) Whether the applicant or its agent has previously violated the provisions of this part.
( 4 ) Where the application concerns a long-term wet lease: ( i ) Whether the lessor (applicant) or its agent or the lessee (charterer) or its agent has previously violated the provisions of the Department's charter regulations.
( ii ) Whether, because of the nature of the arrangement and the benefits involved, the authority sought should be the subject of a bilateral agreement.
( iii ) To what extent the lessor owns and/or controls the lessee, or is owned and/or controlled by the lessee.
( c ) The Department will submit any denial of an authorization specifically required of a foreign air carrier under § 212.9(d) to the President of the United States at least 10 days before the proposed departure. The denial will be subject to stay or disapproval by the President within 10 days after it is submitted. A shorter period for Presidential review may be specified by the Department where the application for authorization is not timely or properly filed. Denial of a late-filed application need not be submitted to the President. For the purposes of this paragraph, an application filed by a foreign air carrier under § 212.9(d) to conduct a cargo charter will be considered as timely filed only if it is filed at least 30 calendar days before the proposed flight, notwithstanding the 10-day filing requirement for cargo charters in § 212.10(d)(3).
( d ) The Department will publish notice of its actions on applications for statements of authorization in its Weekly List of Applications Filed. Interested persons may upon request obtain copies of letters of endorsed forms advising applicants of action taken on their applications.
[Docket No. OST-97-2356, 63 FR 28236, May 22, 1998, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15925, Apr. 16, 2019]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Daniel J. Forbush, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Metals Corporation for the year ended April 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of General Metals Corporation.


Dated: August 15, 2011


/s/ Daniel J. ForbushDaniel J. ForbushPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)General Metals Corporation




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to General Metals Corporation and will be retained by General Metals Corporation. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 171.103 Requests for IFR procedure. ( a ) Each person who requests an IFR procedure based on an SDF that he owns must submit the following information with that request: ( 1 ) A description of the facility and evidence that the equipment meets the performance requirements of § 171.109 and the standards and tolerances of § 171.111, and is installed in accordance with § 171.113.
( 2 ) A proposed procedure for operating the facility.
( 3 ) A proposed maintenance organization and a maintenance manual that meets the requirements of § 171.115.
( 4 ) A statement of intent to meet the requirements of this subpart.
( 5 ) A showing that the facility has an acceptable level of operational reliability as prescribed in § 171.111(k), and an acceptable standard of performance. Previous equivalent operational experience with a facility with identical design and operational characteristics will be considered in showing compliance with this paragraph.
( b ) After the Federal Aviation Administration inspects and evaluates the facility, it advises the owner of the results and of any required changes in the facility or the maintenance manual or maintenance organization. The owner must then correct the deficiencies, if any, and operate the facility for an in-service evaluation by the Federal Aviation Administration.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-14-00344- CV

Blain e Standif

ord, Appellan t
v. CitiMor tgage, Inc.; Mer scorp Holdin gs, Inc.; Vendor Re source M anagem ent;

and Ju anita Strickland , Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 126 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 2-0 0370 9, H ONO RAB LE GISELA D. TRI ANA, JUDGE P RESIDING
O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

Appellant Bla ine Standiford h as fi led an ag ree d motion to dismiss appellee Vendor Resource Manag ement from this appea l. Acc ording ly , we g rant the motion and dismiss this appea l to the ext ent that it was broug ht ag ainst appellee Vendor Resource Manag ement. SeeTex. R. App. P. 42.1. Fur

ther, we direc t the cler

k of this Court to re- sty le the caption of the instant appea l as follows: Bla ine Standiford, Appe llant
v. Citi Mortg ag e, Inc. and Me rscor p Holdings, Inc., Appe llees
I t is so ordered Septe mber 30, 2014. Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in
§ 23.2235 Structural strength. The structure must support: ( a ) Limit loads without— ( 1 ) Interference with the safe operation of the airplane; and
( 2 ) Detrimental permanent deformation.
( b ) Ultimate loads.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk July 30 , 2020

16 1 262 ( 49 )

JODY POHLMAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant

, SC: 16 1 262

v COA: 34 4121

Oakland CC: 2017

- 853588

- DO

JAMES G

. POHLMAN

, Defendant

- Appell ee

.

_________________________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Family Law Council of the State

Bar of Michigan to fil e a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted

on July 16 , 2020 is accepted for filing

.
Editorial Note on Part 206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 206 appear at 84 FR 15925, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 206.5 Small aircraft operations by certificated carriers. ( a ) A carrier holding an effective certificate issued under section 41102 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, when conducting operations with small aircraft, is exempt from the requirements of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII as set forth in subpart B of part 298 of this chapter, except section 41708 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, and is subject to the requirements set forth in the following provisions of this chapter: ( 1 ) Part 205, with the minimum coverage requirements of § 205.5(b),
( 2 ) Part 215,
( 3 ) Part 298, subpart D, §§ 298.30, and 298.38, and subpart H, and
( 4 ) Part 298, subpart F, if the certificated carrier conducts operations with small aircraft only (a certificated carrier conducting operations with both small and large aircraft is subject only to the reporting requirements contained in part 241 of this chapter).
( b ) If a certificated carrier, when conducting operations with small aircraft, provides foreign air transportation that includes a segment for which tariff filing is required and another segment for which tariff filing is not required, then for through service over that routing the carrier has the option of filing a tariff or charging the sum of the applicable local rates, fares, or charges. If the carrier files a tariff for through service, it is not exempt from Chapter 415 or section 41310 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII for that air transportation.
[Doc. No. 47939, 57 FR 40102, Sept. 2, 1992, as amended at 60 FR 43524, Aug. 22, 1995]
Chapter 3: Affected Environment

US Fish & Wildlife Service

Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge
Jefferson County, CO

Boulder County
fe Jefferson County

Potential Prairie Dog Habitat 0 Os jmie
[EBB Primary Habitat (Slope tess than 10%) December 2003
Secondary Habitat (Slope between 10 and 20%)

Existing Prairie Dog Colony (CDOW 2000)

Existing Prairie Dog Colony (Active in 2003)

Unsuitable Habitat

DOE Retained Area (Subject to Change)

NOTE: Initial prairie dog habitat was defined by preferred soil type and vegetation communities. Historically,
prairie dogs have been known to colonize non-habitat areas,

Figure no. 17

112 Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge