# Official Journal C 222/6 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 222 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 636 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 222

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 636 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2020/C 222/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2020/C 222/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 222/02 | Joined Cases C-370/17 and C-37/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Bobigny and Cour de cassation, France) — Caisse de retraite du personnel navigant professionnel de l’aéronautique civile (CRPNPAC) v Vueling Airlines SA (C-370/17), Vueling Airlines SA v Jean-Luc Poignant (C-37/18) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Migrant workers — Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Legislation applicable — Article 14(1)(a) — Posted workers — Article 14(2)(a)(i) — Person normally employed in the territory of two or more Member States and employed by a branch or a permanent representation that an undertaking has in the territory of a Member State other than that where it has its registered office — Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 — Article 11(1)(a) — Article 12a(1a) — E 101 certificate — Binding effect — Certificate fraudulently obtained or relied on — Power of the courts of the host Member State to make a finding of fraud and to disregard the certificate — Article 84a(3) of Regulation No 1408/71 — Cooperation between competent institutions — Authority in civil proceedings of res judicata in criminal proceedings — Primacy of EU law) | 2 |
| 2020/C 222/03 | Joined Cases C-715/17, C-718/17 and C-719/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — European Commission v Republic of Poland, Commission v Hungary, Commission v Czech Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Decisions (EU) 2015/1523 and (EU) 2015/1601 — Article 5(2) and 5(4) to 5(11) of each of those decisions — Provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece — Emergency situation characterised by a sudden influx of third-country nationals into certain Member States — Relocation of those nationals to other Member States — Relocation procedure — Obligation on the Member States to indicate at regular intervals, and at least every three months, the number of applicants for international protection who can be relocated swiftly to their territory — Consequent obligations leading to actual relocation — Interests of the Member States linked to national security and public order — Possibility for a Member State to rely on Article 72 TFEU in order not to apply EU legal acts of a binding nature) | 3 |
| 2020/C 222/04 | Joined Cases C-103/18 and C-429/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 8 de Madrid, Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 14 de Madrid— Spain) — Domingo Sánchez Ruiz (C-103/18), Berta Fernández Álvarez and Others (C-429/18) v Comunidad de Madrid (Servicio Madrileño de Salud) (References for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework Agreement, concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP regarding fixed-term work — Clause 5 — Concept of ‘successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships’ — Failure by the employer to respect the relevant legal deadline for definitively filling posts temporarily occupied by fixed-term workers — Implicit extension of the employment relationship from year to year — Occupation by a fixed-term worker of the same post in the context of two consecutive appointments — Concept of ‘objective reasons’ justifying the renewal of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships — Respect for the reasons for recruitment provided for by the national legislation — Concrete examination finding that the successive renewal of fixed-term employment relationships seeks to cover the employer’s permanent and regular staffing needs — Measures seeking to prevent and, where appropriate, to punish abuses resulting from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships — Selection procedures seeking to definitively fill posts occupied temporarily by fixed-term workers — Conversion of the situation of fixed-term workers into ‘non-permanent workers of indefinite duration’ — Grant to the worker of compensation equal to that paid in the event of unfair dismissal — Applicability of the Framework Agreement despite the fact that the worker consented to successive renewals of fixed-term contracts — Clause 5(1) — Absence of obligation for national courts to disapply inconsistent national legislation) | 5 |
| 2020/C 222/05 | Case C-228/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Gazdasági Versenyhivatal v Budapest Bank Nyrt. and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 101(1) TFEU — Card payment systems — Interbank agreement fixing the level of interchange fees — Agreement restricting competition ‘by object’ and ‘by effect’ — Concept of restriction of competition ‘by object’) | 6 |
| 2020/C 222/06 | Case C-234/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Komisia za protivodeystvie na koruptsiyata i za otnemane na nezakonno pridobitoto imushtestvo v BP, AB, PB, ‘Тrast B’ ООD, ‘Agro In 2001’ EOOD, ‘ACounT Service 2009’ EOOD, ‘Invest Management’ OOD, ‘Estate’ OOD, ‘Bromak’ OOD, ‘Bromak Finance’ EAD, ‘Viva Telekom Bulgaria’ EOOD, ‘Balgarska Telekomunikationna Kompania’ AD, ‘Hedge Investment Bulgaria’ AD, ‘Kemira’ OOD, ‘Dunarit’ AD, ‘Technologichen Zentar-Institut Po Mikroelektronika’ AD, ‘Еvrobild 2003’ EOOD, ‘Тechnotel Invest’ AD, ‘Ken Trade’ EAD, ‘Konsult Av’ EOOD, Louvrier Investments Company 33 SA, EFV International Financial Ventures Ltd, Interv Investment SARL, LIC Telecommunications SARL, V Telecom Investment SCA, V2 Investment SARL, Empreno Ventures Ltd (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Proceedings for the confiscation of illegally obtained assets in the absence of a criminal conviction — Directive 2014/42/EU — Scope — Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA) | 7 |
| 2020/C 222/07 | Case C-406/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — PG v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Powers and obligations of the first instance court or tribunal — No power to vary the decisions of the authorities competent in the area of international protection — National legislation providing for an obligation to adjudicate within a time limit of 60 days) | 8 |
| 2020/C 222/08 | Case C-458/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — ‘GVC Services (Bulgaria)’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Sofia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States — Directive 2011/96/EU — Article 2(a)(i) and (iii), and Annex I, Part A(ab) and the last indent of Part B — Concepts of ‘companies incorporated under United Kingdom law’ and ‘United Kingdom corporation tax’ — Companies registered in Gibraltar which are subject to corporation tax there) | 9 |
| 2020/C 222/09 | Case C-500/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Cluj — Romania) — AU v Reliantco Investments LTD, Reliantco Investments LTD Limassol Sucursala Bucureşti (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Markets in financial instruments — Directive 2004/39/EC — Meanings of ‘retail client’ and ‘consumer’ — Conditions for relying on the status of consumer — Determining jurisdiction to hear the request) | 9 |
| 2020/C 222/10 | Case C-564/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — LH v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylum policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Application for international protection — Article 33(2) — Grounds of inadmissibility — National legislation under which an application is inadmissible if the applicant has arrived in the Member State concerned via a country in which he or she is not exposed to persecution or the risk of serious harm, or if that country provides sufficient protection — Article 46 — Right to an effective remedy — Judicial review of administrative decisions concerning the inadmissibility of applications for international protection — Time limit of eight days within which to give a decision — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) | 10 |
| 2020/C 222/11 | Case C-567/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Amazon FC Graben GmbH, Amazon Europe Core Sàrl, Amazon EU Sàrl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 9 — Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 9 — Rights conferred by a trade mark — Use — Stocking of goods for the purposes of offering them or putting them on the market — Storage with a view to dispatching goods sold in an online marketplace which infringe trade mark rights) | 11 |
| 2020/C 222/12 | Case C-612/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2020 — ClientEarth v European Commission (Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 4(1)(a), third indent, and (6) — Exceptions to the right of access — Protection of the public interest as regards international relations — Documents drawn up by the European Commission’s legal service concerning Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Investment Court System in EU trade agreements — Partial refusal of access) | 12 |
| 2020/C 222/13 | Case C-753/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen — Sweden) — Föreningen Svenska Tonsättares Internationella Musikbyrå u.p.a. (Stim), Svenska Artisters och musikers, intresseorganisation ek. för. (SAMI) v Fleetmanager Sweden AB, Nordisk Biluthyrning AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 3(1) — Directive 2006/115/EC — Article 8(2) — Concept of ‘communication to the public’ — Undertaking hiring out cars each having a radio receiver as standard equipment) | 12 |
| 2020/C 222/14 | Case C-765/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Koblenz — Germany) — Stadtwerke Neuwied GmbH v RI (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/55/EC — Common rules for the internal market in natural gas — Consumer protection — Article 3(3) and point (b) of Annex A — Transparency of contractual terms and conditions — Obligation to give consumers adequate notice directly of an increase in charges) | 13 |
| 2020/C 222/15 | Case C-802/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil supérieur de la Sécurité sociale — Luxembourg) — Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants v FV, GW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 45 TFEU — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 1(i) — Freedom of movement for workers — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 2(2) — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Family allowance — Concept of ‘family members’ — Exclusion of children of spouses of non-resident workers — Difference in treatment vis-à-vis children of spouses of resident workers — Justification) | 14 |
| 2020/C 222/16 | Case C-45/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de A Coruña — Spain) — Compañía de Tranvías de La Coruña SA v Ayuntamiento de A Coruña (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Article 8 — Transitional arrangements — Article 8(3) — Expiry of public service contracts — Calculation of the maximum contractual term set at 30 years — Determination of the date from which the maximum term of 30 years starts to run) | 15 |
| 2020/C 222/17 | Case C-329/19: Judgment of the Court of Justice (First Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano — Italy) — Condominio di Milano, via Meda v Eurothermo SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Article 1(1) — Article 2(b) — Definition of ‘consumer’ — Commonhold of a building) | 15 |
| 2020/C 222/18 | Case C-897/19 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovni sud — Croatia) — Criminal proceedings against I.N. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — EEA Agreement — Non-discrimination — Article 36 — Freedom to provide services — Scope — Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis — Agreement on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway — Extradition to a third State of an Icelandic national — Protection of a Member State’s nationals against extradition — No equivalent protection for nationals of another State — Icelandic national who was granted asylum under national law before acquiring Icelandic citizenship — Restriction of freedom of movement — Justification based on the prevention of impunity — Proportionality — Verification of the guarantees provided for in Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) | 16 |
| 2020/C 222/19 | Case C-141/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 23 March 2020 — Finanzamt Kiel v Norddeutsche Gesellschaft für Diakonie mbH | 17 |
| 2020/C 222/20 | Case C-160/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Rotterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 24 March 2020 — Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd and Others v Staatssecretaris van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport | 17 |
| 2020/C 222/21 | Case C-175/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 14 April 2020 — SIA SS v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests | 19 |
| 2020/C 222/22 | Case C-181/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 24 April 2020 — VYSOČINA WIND a.s. v Česká republika — Ministerstvo životního prostředí | 20 |
| 2020/C 222/23 | Case C-186/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 29 April 2020 — HYDINA SK s.r.o. v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky | 20 |
| | General Court |
| 2020/C 222/24 | Case T-282/18: Order of the General Court of 14 May 2020 –Bernis and Others v SRB (Action for annulment — Economic and Monetary Union — Banking Union — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Parent company and subsidiary — Declaration by the ECB that an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Decision of the SRB not to adopt a resolution scheme — Lack of public interest — Winding up in accordance with national law — Shareholders — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility) | 22 |
| 2020/C 222/25 | Case T-141/19: Order of the General Court of 6 May 2020 — Sabo and Others v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Environment — Energy — Directive (EU) 2018/2001 — Inclusion of forest biomass among the sources of renewable energy — Act not of individual concern — Inadmissibility) | 23 |
| 2020/C 222/26 | Case T-278/19: Order of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Aurora v CPVO — SESVanderhave (M 02205) (Action for annulment — Plant varieties — Nullity proceedings — Sugar beet variety M 02205 — Decision to remit the case to the competent body of the CPVO for further action — Article 72 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — No interest in bringing proceedings — Power to alter decisions — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 24 |
| 2020/C 222/27 | Case T-308/19: Order of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Lucaccioni v Commission (Action for annulment and for compensation — Civil service — Non actionable measure — Preparatory measure — No claim — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part inadmissible) | 24 |
| 2020/C 222/28 | Case T-757/19: Action brought on 6 May 2020 — HB v EIB | 25 |
| 2020/C 222/29 | Case T-217/20: Action brought on 16 April 2020 — Hellenic Republic v Commission | 26 |
| 2020/C 222/30 | Case T-247/20: Action brought on 4 May 2020 — JP v Commission | 27 |
| 2020/C 222/31 | Case T-258/20: Action brought on 4 May 2020 — Klymenko v Council | 28 |
| 2020/C 222/32 | Case T-261/20: Action brought on 6 May 2020 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (ROCHEM) | 29 |
| 2020/C 222/33 | Case T-262/20: Action brought on 6 May 2020 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (ROCHEM) | 30 |
| 2020/C 222/34 | Case T-267/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Arbuzov v Council | 31 |
| 2020/C 222/35 | Case T-268/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Pšonka v Council | 32 |
| 2020/C 222/36 | Case T-269/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Pšonka v Council | 33 |
| 2020/C 222/37 | Case T-278/20: Action brought on 11 May 2020 — Zhejiang Hangtong Machinery Manufacture and Ningbo Hi-Tech Zone Tongcheng Auto Parts v Commission | 34 |
| 2020/C 222/38 | Case T-279/20: Action brought on 12 May 2020 — CWS Powder Coatings v Commission | 35 |
| 2020/C 222/39 | Case T-284/20: Action brought on 13 May 2020 — Klaus Berthold v EUIPO — Thomann (HB Harley Benton) | 36 |
| 2020/C 222/40 | Case T-285/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — MCM Products v EUIPO — The Nomad Company (NOMAD) | 37 |
| 2020/C 222/41 | Case T-286/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — Capella v EUIPO — Cobi.bike (GOBI) | 38 |
| 2020/C 222/42 | Case T-287/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — Eggy Food v EUIPO (EGGY FOOD) | 38 |
| 2020/C 222/43 | Case T-288/20: Action brought on 13 May 2020 — Brillux and Daw v Commission | 39 |
| 2020/C 222/44 | Case T-290/20: Action brought on 14 May 2020 — Ceramica Flaminia v EUIPO — Ceramica Cielo (goclean) | 40 |
| 2020/C 222/45 | Case T-291/20: Action brought on 14 May 2020 — Yanukovych v Council | 41 |
| 2020/C 222/46 | Case T-292/20: Action brought on 14 May 2020 — Yanukovych v Council | 42 |
| 2020/C 222/47 | Case T-293/20: Action brought on 18 May 2020 — Ruiz-Ruiz v Commission | 43 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2020/C 222/02

Joined Cases C-370/17 and C-37/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Bobigny and Cour de cassation, France) — Caisse de retraite du personnel navigant professionnel de l’aéronautique civile (CRPNPAC) v Vueling Airlines SA (C-370/17), Vueling Airlines SA v Jean-Luc Poignant (C-37/18) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Migrant workers — Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Legislation applicable — Article 14(1)(a) — Posted workers — Article 14(2)(a)(i) — Person normally employed in the territory of two or more Member States and employed by a branch or a permanent representation that an undertaking has in the territory of a Member State other than that where it has its registered office — Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 — Article 11(1)(a) — Article 12a(1a) — E 101 certificate — Binding effect — Certificate fraudulently obtained or relied on — Power of the courts of the host Member State to make a finding of fraud and to disregard the certificate — Article 84a(3) of Regulation No 1408/71 — Cooperation between competent institutions — Authority in civil proceedings of res judicata in criminal proceedings — Primacy of EU law)

2

2020/C 222/03

Joined Cases C-715/17, C-718/17 and C-719/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — European Commission v Republic of Poland, Commission v Hungary, Commission v Czech Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Decisions (EU) 2015/1523 and (EU) 2015/1601 — Article 5(2) and 5(4) to 5(11) of each of those decisions — Provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece — Emergency situation characterised by a sudden influx of third-country nationals into certain Member States — Relocation of those nationals to other Member States — Relocation procedure — Obligation on the Member States to indicate at regular intervals, and at least every three months, the number of applicants for international protection who can be relocated swiftly to their territory — Consequent obligations leading to actual relocation — Interests of the Member States linked to national security and public order — Possibility for a Member State to rely on Article 72 TFEU in order not to apply EU legal acts of a binding nature)

3

2020/C 222/04

Joined Cases C-103/18 and C-429/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 8 de Madrid, Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 14 de Madrid— Spain) — Domingo Sánchez Ruiz (C-103/18), Berta Fernández Álvarez and Others (C-429/18) v Comunidad de Madrid (Servicio Madrileño de Salud) (References for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework Agreement, concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP regarding fixed-term work — Clause 5 — Concept of ‘successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships’ — Failure by the employer to respect the relevant legal deadline for definitively filling posts temporarily occupied by fixed-term workers — Implicit extension of the employment relationship from year to year — Occupation by a fixed-term worker of the same post in the context of two consecutive appointments — Concept of ‘objective reasons’ justifying the renewal of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships — Respect for the reasons for recruitment provided for by the national legislation — Concrete examination finding that the successive renewal of fixed-term employment relationships seeks to cover the employer’s permanent and regular staffing needs — Measures seeking to prevent and, where appropriate, to punish abuses resulting from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships — Selection procedures seeking to definitively fill posts occupied temporarily by fixed-term workers — Conversion of the situation of fixed-term workers into ‘non-permanent workers of indefinite duration’ — Grant to the worker of compensation equal to that paid in the event of unfair dismissal — Applicability of the Framework Agreement despite the fact that the worker consented to successive renewals of fixed-term contracts — Clause 5(1) — Absence of obligation for national courts to disapply inconsistent national legislation)

5

2020/C 222/05

Case C-228/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Gazdasági Versenyhivatal v Budapest Bank Nyrt. and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 101(1) TFEU — Card payment systems — Interbank agreement fixing the level of interchange fees — Agreement restricting competition ‘by object’ and ‘by effect’ — Concept of restriction of competition ‘by object’)

6

2020/C 222/06

Case C-234/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Komisia za protivodeystvie na koruptsiyata i za otnemane na nezakonno pridobitoto imushtestvo v BP, AB, PB, ‘Тrast B’ ООD, ‘Agro In 2001’ EOOD, ‘ACounT Service 2009’ EOOD, ‘Invest Management’ OOD, ‘Estate’ OOD, ‘Bromak’ OOD, ‘Bromak Finance’ EAD, ‘Viva Telekom Bulgaria’ EOOD, ‘Balgarska Telekomunikationna Kompania’ AD, ‘Hedge Investment Bulgaria’ AD, ‘Kemira’ OOD, ‘Dunarit’ AD, ‘Technologichen Zentar-Institut Po Mikroelektronika’ AD, ‘Еvrobild 2003’ EOOD, ‘Тechnotel Invest’ AD, ‘Ken Trade’ EAD, ‘Konsult Av’ EOOD, Louvrier Investments Company 33 SA, EFV International Financial Ventures Ltd, Interv Investment SARL, LIC Telecommunications SARL, V Telecom Investment SCA, V2 Investment SARL, Empreno Ventures Ltd (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Proceedings for the confiscation of illegally obtained assets in the absence of a criminal conviction — Directive 2014/42/EU — Scope — Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA)

7

2020/C 222/07

Case C-406/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — PG v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Powers and obligations of the first instance court or tribunal — No power to vary the decisions of the authorities competent in the area of international protection — National legislation providing for an obligation to adjudicate within a time limit of 60 days)

8

2020/C 222/08

Case C-458/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — ‘GVC Services (Bulgaria)’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Sofia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States — Directive 2011/96/EU — Article 2(a)(i) and (iii), and Annex I, Part A(ab) and the last indent of Part B — Concepts of ‘companies incorporated under United Kingdom law’ and ‘United Kingdom corporation tax’ — Companies registered in Gibraltar which are subject to corporation tax there)

9

2020/C 222/09

Case C-500/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Cluj — Romania) — AU v Reliantco Investments LTD, Reliantco Investments LTD Limassol Sucursala Bucureşti (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Markets in financial instruments — Directive 2004/39/EC — Meanings of ‘retail client’ and ‘consumer’ — Conditions for relying on the status of consumer — Determining jurisdiction to hear the request)

9

2020/C 222/10

Case C-564/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — LH v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylum policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Application for international protection — Article 33(2) — Grounds of inadmissibility — National legislation under which an application is inadmissible if the applicant has arrived in the Member State concerned via a country in which he or she is not exposed to persecution or the risk of serious harm, or if that country provides sufficient protection — Article 46 — Right to an effective remedy — Judicial review of administrative decisions concerning the inadmissibility of applications for international protection — Time limit of eight days within which to give a decision — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

10

2020/C 222/11

Case C-567/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Amazon FC Graben GmbH, Amazon Europe Core Sàrl, Amazon EU Sàrl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 9 — Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 9 — Rights conferred by a trade mark — Use — Stocking of goods for the purposes of offering them or putting them on the market — Storage with a view to dispatching goods sold in an online marketplace which infringe trade mark rights)

11

2020/C 222/12

Case C-612/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2020 — ClientEarth v European Commission (Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 4(1)(a), third indent, and (6) — Exceptions to the right of access — Protection of the public interest as regards international relations — Documents drawn up by the European Commission’s legal service concerning Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Investment Court System in EU trade agreements — Partial refusal of access)

12

2020/C 222/13

Case C-753/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen — Sweden) — Föreningen Svenska Tonsättares Internationella Musikbyrå u.p.a. (Stim), Svenska Artisters och musikers, intresseorganisation ek. för. (SAMI) v Fleetmanager Sweden AB, Nordisk Biluthyrning AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 3(1) — Directive 2006/115/EC — Article 8(2) — Concept of ‘communication to the public’ — Undertaking hiring out cars each having a radio receiver as standard equipment)

12

2020/C 222/14

Case C-765/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Koblenz — Germany) — Stadtwerke Neuwied GmbH v RI (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/55/EC — Common rules for the internal market in natural gas — Consumer protection — Article 3(3) and point (b) of Annex A — Transparency of contractual terms and conditions — Obligation to give consumers adequate notice directly of an increase in charges)

13

2020/C 222/15

Case C-802/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil supérieur de la Sécurité sociale — Luxembourg) — Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants v FV, GW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 45 TFEU — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 1(i) — Freedom of movement for workers — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 2(2) — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Family allowance — Concept of ‘family members’ — Exclusion of children of spouses of non-resident workers — Difference in treatment vis-à-vis children of spouses of resident workers — Justification)

14

2020/C 222/16

Case C-45/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de A Coruña — Spain) — Compañía de Tranvías de La Coruña SA v Ayuntamiento de A Coruña (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Article 8 — Transitional arrangements — Article 8(3) — Expiry of public service contracts — Calculation of the maximum contractual term set at 30 years — Determination of the date from which the maximum term of 30 years starts to run)

15

2020/C 222/17

Case C-329/19: Judgment of the Court of Justice (First Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano — Italy) — Condominio di Milano, via Meda v Eurothermo SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Article 1(1) — Article 2(b) — Definition of ‘consumer’ — Commonhold of a building)

15

2020/C 222/18

Case C-897/19 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovni sud — Croatia) — Criminal proceedings against I.N. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — EEA Agreement — Non-discrimination — Article 36 — Freedom to provide services — Scope — Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis — Agreement on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway — Extradition to a third State of an Icelandic national — Protection of a Member State’s nationals against extradition — No equivalent protection for nationals of another State — Icelandic national who was granted asylum under national law before acquiring Icelandic citizenship — Restriction of freedom of movement — Justification based on the prevention of impunity — Proportionality — Verification of the guarantees provided for in Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

16

2020/C 222/19

Case C-141/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 23 March 2020 — Finanzamt Kiel v Norddeutsche Gesellschaft für Diakonie mbH

17

2020/C 222/20

Case C-160/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Rotterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 24 March 2020 — Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd and Others v Staatssecretaris van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport

17

2020/C 222/21

Case C-175/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 14 April 2020 — SIA SS v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

19

2020/C 222/22

Case C-181/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 24 April 2020 — VYSOČINA WIND a.s. v Česká republika — Ministerstvo životního prostředí

20

2020/C 222/23

Case C-186/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 29 April 2020 — HYDINA SK s.r.o. v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky

20

General Court

2020/C 222/24

Case T-282/18: Order of the General Court of 14 May 2020 –Bernis and Others v SRB (Action for annulment — Economic and Monetary Union — Banking Union — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Parent company and subsidiary — Declaration by the ECB that an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Decision of the SRB not to adopt a resolution scheme — Lack of public interest — Winding up in accordance with national law — Shareholders — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)

22

2020/C 222/25

Case T-141/19: Order of the General Court of 6 May 2020 — Sabo and Others v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Environment — Energy — Directive (EU) 2018/2001 — Inclusion of forest biomass among the sources of renewable energy — Act not of individual concern — Inadmissibility)

23

2020/C 222/26

Case T-278/19: Order of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Aurora v CPVO — SESVanderhave (M 02205) (Action for annulment — Plant varieties — Nullity proceedings — Sugar beet variety M 02205 — Decision to remit the case to the competent body of the CPVO for further action — Article 72 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — No interest in bringing proceedings — Power to alter decisions — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

24

2020/C 222/27

Case T-308/19: Order of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Lucaccioni v Commission (Action for annulment and for compensation — Civil service — Non actionable measure — Preparatory measure — No claim — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part inadmissible)

24

2020/C 222/28

Case T-757/19: Action brought on 6 May 2020 — HB v EIB

25

2020/C 222/29

Case T-217/20: Action brought on 16 April 2020 — Hellenic Republic v Commission

26

2020/C 222/30

Case T-247/20: Action brought on 4 May 2020 — JP v Commission

27

2020/C 222/31

Case T-258/20: Action brought on 4 May 2020 — Klymenko v Council

28

2020/C 222/32

Case T-261/20: Action brought on 6 May 2020 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (ROCHEM)

29

2020/C 222/33

Case T-262/20: Action brought on 6 May 2020 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (ROCHEM)

30

2020/C 222/34

Case T-267/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Arbuzov v Council

31

2020/C 222/35

Case T-268/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Pšonka v Council

32

2020/C 222/36

Case T-269/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Pšonka v Council

33

2020/C 222/37

Case T-278/20: Action brought on 11 May 2020 — Zhejiang Hangtong Machinery Manufacture and Ningbo Hi-Tech Zone Tongcheng Auto Parts v Commission

34

2020/C 222/38

Case T-279/20: Action brought on 12 May 2020 — CWS Powder Coatings v Commission

35

2020/C 222/39

Case T-284/20: Action brought on 13 May 2020 — Klaus Berthold v EUIPO — Thomann (HB Harley Benton)

36

2020/C 222/40

Case T-285/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — MCM Products v EUIPO — The Nomad Company (NOMAD)

37

2020/C 222/41

Case T-286/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — Capella v EUIPO — Cobi.bike (GOBI)

38

2020/C 222/42

Case T-287/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — Eggy Food v EUIPO (EGGY FOOD)

38

2020/C 222/43

Case T-288/20: Action brought on 13 May 2020 — Brillux and Daw v Commission

39

2020/C 222/44

Case T-290/20: Action brought on 14 May 2020 — Ceramica Flaminia v EUIPO — Ceramica Cielo (goclean)

40

2020/C 222/45

Case T-291/20: Action brought on 14 May 2020 — Yanukovych v Council

41

2020/C 222/46

Case T-292/20: Action brought on 14 May 2020 — Yanukovych v Council

42

2020/C 222/47

Case T-293/20: Action brought on 18 May 2020 — Ruiz-Ruiz v Commission

43

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN