alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 1 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 2 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 3 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 4 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 5 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 6 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 7 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 8 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 9 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 10 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 11 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 12 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 13 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 14 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 15 of 16Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24183-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 14:43:23 Desc:Exhibit Administrative Expenses Proof of Claim Page 16 of 16
NUMBER 13-14-00693-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MARIANN BACHARACH, Appellant,

v.

EUFEMIA GARCIA, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 389th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas

____________________________________________________________

O R D E R 

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion to file an amended brief “to 

reflect issues brought up in the [October 1, 2014] trial court hearing” on her motion to 

dismiss.
2

On June 1, 2015, this Court received appellant’s original brief. On June 3, 2015, 

the court reporter filed a supplemental record, which included only the direct examination 

of appellant at the October 1, 2014 hearing on her motion to dismiss. Subsequently, 

appellant filed three amended briefs in an effort to comply with the rules of this Court. 

Her third amended brief complied, and we marked it filed on June 22, 2015.

We have reviewed appellant’s third amended brief and have found that it does not 

include issues, if any, raised by her testimony at the October 1 hearing. Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 38.7 provides that “[a] brief may be amended or supplemented 

whenever justice requires, on whatever reasonable terms the court may prescribe.” TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.7. After due consideration of appellant’s motion, the timing of the filing of 

the supplemental reporter’s record, and the compliance issues that have now been 

resolved, the Court has determined that appellant’s motion should be granted.

Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion to file her fourth amended brief

should she choose to do so, but only to reflect issues that appellant claims were raised 

at the October 1, 2014 hearing on her motion to dismiss. Appellant’s fourth amended 

brief, if any, is due on July 6, 2015. No further extensions will be granted. Appellee’s 

brief will be due on July 27, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

25th day of June, 2015.
§ 25.471 General. ( a ) *Loads and equilibrium.* For limit ground loads— ( 1 ) Limit ground loads obtained under this subpart are considered to be external forces applied to the airplane structure; and
( 2 ) In each specified ground load condition, the external loads must be placed in equilibrium with the linear and angular inertia loads in a rational or conservative manner.
( b ) *Critical centers of gravity.* The critical centers of gravity within the range for which certification is requested must be selected so that the maximum design loads are obtained in each landing gear element. Fore and aft, vertical, and lateral airplane centers of gravity must be considered. Lateral displacements of the c.g. from the airplane centerline which would result in main gear loads not greater than 103 percent of the critical design load for symmetrical loading conditions may be selected without considering the effects of these lateral c.g. displacements on the loading of the main gear elements, or on the airplane structure provided— ( 1 ) The lateral displacement of the c.g. results from random passenger or cargo disposition within the fuselage or from random unsymmetrical fuel loading or fuel usage; and
( 2 ) Appropriate loading instructions for random disposable loads are included under the provisions of § 25.1583(c)(2) to ensure that the lateral displacement of the center of gravity is maintained within these limits.
( c ) *Landing gear dimension data.* Figure 1 of appendix A contains the basic landing gear dimension data.
[Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5673, Apr. 8, 1970, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. 25-148, 87 FR 75710, Dec. 9, 2022; 88 FR 2813, Jan. 18, 2023]
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.19d
                                    AMENDMENT


This Amendment made this 25th day of February, 2003, by and between Steven
Hanson (the "Executive"), ON Semiconductor Corporation and Semiconductor
Components Industries, L.L.C. (collectively, the "Company").

         WHEREAS, Company and Executive entered into an Agreement dated
         November 21, 2003;

         WHEREAS, Company and Executive wish to amend the Agreement,

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
covenants and promises contained herein and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the
Executive hereby agree as follows:

1.       Section 2(d) is deleted in its entirety and the following is
         substituted therefore: "Company agrees to pay all premium cost
         associated with Executive's retiree medical and dental insurance from
         Motorola for a period of eighteen (18) months commencing with the
         December 2002 premium."

Except as otherwise amended above, all other provisions of the Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect.

                                     ON SEMICONDUCTOR
                                     CORPORATION &
                                     SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS
                                     INDUSTRIES, L.L.C.



                                     /s/ SONNY CAVE
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Sonny Cave
                                     Title: Vice President and Secretary




                                     /s/ STEVEN HANSON
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     Steven Hanson
§ 27.1091 Air induction. ( a ) The air induction system for each engine must supply the air required by that engine under the operating conditions and maneuvers for which certification is requested.
( b ) Each cold air induction system opening must be outside the cowling if backfire flames can emerge.
( c ) If fuel can accumulate in any air induction system, that system must have drains that discharge fuel— ( 1 ) Clear of the rotorcraft; and
( 2 ) Out of the path of exhaust flames.
( d ) For turbine engine powered rotorcraft— ( 1 ) There must be means to prevent hazardous quantities of fuel leakage or overflow from drains, vents, or other components of flammable fluid systems from entering the engine intake system; and
( 2 ) The air inlet ducts must be located or protected so as to minimize the ingestion of foreign matter during takeoff, landing, and taxiing.
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-2, 33 FR 964, Jan. 26, 1968; Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34214, Sept. 2, 1988]
'·September14,2015U.S.DepartmentofTransportationDocketManagementSystem1200NewJerseyAve.,SEWashingtonDC20590Re:AmendmenttoExemptionNo.12541filedpursuanttoSection333oftheFAAReformActandPart11oftheFederalAviationRegulationsinRegulatoryDocketNo.FAA-2015-1644-0001.DearSirorMadam;GraniteConstructionhasbeengrantedExemptionnumbered12541(hereinaftertheExemption)forthepurposeofaerialimagingtomonitorandensuresafetyofsecuredandcontrolledenvironmentalconstructionsites.GraniteherebyrequestsanamendmenttotheExemptiontoallowanadditionalmodelofunmannedaircraftsystems(UAS)thatfullycomplieswiththeconditionsoftheExemption.GranitewishestooperatetheKespryUASunderthesametermsandconditionscontainedintheExemption.Attachedhereto,andsubmittedasaconfidentialdocument,istheFlightOperationsandProceduresManualfortheKespryUAS.AlloperationsoftheadditionalUASwillbeinfullcompliancewiththetermsoftheExemption.Pleasecontacttheundersignedshouldyou haveanyquestionsconcerningthisrequestforanamendmenttotheExemption.Sincerelyyours,GraniteConstructionGabrielDobbsKespry,Inc.
#### § 262.8 Disclosure of restrictions, conditions or limitations.

A carrier shall not impose unreasonable restrictions, conditions or limitations on the travel credits or vouchers, including a validity period that is shorter than five years from the date of issuance, a restriction on the transferability of the credits or vouchers to another individual, conditions that severely restrict booking with respect to travel date, time, route, or class of service; a limitation that allows redemption only in one booking and renders any residual value void; or a limitation that only allows the value of the credits or vouchers to apply to the base fare of a new booking but not government-imposed taxes or fees, carrier imposed fees, or ancillary service fees. A carrier must clearly disclose, no later than at the time of voucher or credit issuance, any material restrictions, limitations, or conditions on the use of the credits and vouchers that are not deemed unreasonable, including but not limited to advance purchase requirement or capacity restrictions and blackout dates.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.7



                                [GRAPHIC OMITTED]

                      FOSTER WHEELER REALTY SERVICES, INC.

                                                             April 21, 2003



Energy (NJ) QRS 15-10, Inc.
c/o W.P. Carey & Co. LLC
50 Rockefeller Plaza, 2nd Floor
New York, New York 10020
Attention: Director, Asset Management

         Re:  Perryville I, Clinton, New Jersey

Dear Director:

         Reference is made to that certain Lease Agreement (the "Lease") dated
August 16, 2002, between Energy (NJ) QRS 15-10, Inc., as Landlord, and Foster
Wheeler Realty Services, Inc., as Tenant, for the above-referenced building (the
"Building").

         Pursuant to Exhibit E of the Lease, we hereby deliver a copy of
Amendment No.2 to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2003 ("the
Amendment"), and, by so doing, modify the covenants and agreements set forth at
Exhibit E consistent with the Amendment. Upon our receipt of your
countersignature, we will promptly arrange to have the Landlord's Consideration
in the amount of $122,167.47 (calculated as shown on Exhibit A hereto) released
to you.

         As of the date hereof, no Event of Default under the Lease has occurred
and is continuing.

         Unless otherwise defined herein, each capitalized term herein shall be
deemed to have the meaning assigned to it in the Lease.

         Please indicate your acknowledgement and acceptance of the foregoing by
countersigning and returning a copy of this letter to us. If you require
additional information, please contact the undersigned.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        FOSTER WHEELER REALTY SERVICES, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Steven I. Weinstein
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Name:  Steven I. Weinstein
                                            Title: President

We hereby acknowledge and accept the foregoing:

ENERGY (NJ) QRS 15-10, INC.

By: ________________________

Dated: April 29, 2003



<PAGE>


Page 2
May 6, 2003



cc:      Reed Smith LLP
         2500 One Liberty Place
         Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
         Attention: Chairman, Real Estate Department

         Wollf & Samson, P.A.
         5 Becker Farm Road
         Roseland, New Jersey 07068
         Attention: Jeffrey M. Gussoff, Esq.


<PAGE>


Page 3
May 6, 2003





                                    EXHIBIT A


 Rent Base                                                       $44,900,000.00
 Amendment Fee @ 27.20879 basis points             =.002720879 %*$44,900,000.00
 Amendment Fee                                                      $122,167.47
§ 161.311 Application procedure for approval of proposed restriction. Each applicant proposing a Stage 3 restriction shall submit to the FAA the following information for each restriction and alternative restriction submitted, with a request that the FAA review and approve the proposed Stage 3 noise or access restriction: ( a ) A summary of evidence of the fulfillment of conditions for approval, as specified in § 161.305;
( b ) An analysis as specified in § 161.305, as appropriate to the proposed restriction;
( c ) A statement that the entity submitting the proposal is the party empowered to implement the restriction, or is submitting the proposal on behalf of such party; and
( d ) A statement as to whether the airport requests, in the event of disapproval of the proposed restriction or any alternatives, that the FAA approve any portion of the restriction or any alternative that meets the statutory requirements for approval. An applicant requesting partial approval of any proposal should indicate its priorities as to portions of the proposal to be approved.
Exhibit 21

                        Subsidiaries of the Company
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>              <C>
                                   2005
Caystar Holdings (100%) Cayman Islands
   Caystar Management (100%) Cayman Islands
   Bogoso Holdings (100%) Cayman Islands
        Bogoso Gold Limited (90%) Ghana
             Prestea Underground JV (90%) Ghana
   Wasford Holdings (100%) Cayman Islands
        Wexford Goldfields Limited (90%) Ghana
   GSR Exploration Limited (100%) Ghana
Golden Star Ressources Miniere SARL (100%) France
EURO Ressources S. A. (53%) France
   Societe de Travaux Publics et de Mines Auriferes en Guyane ("SOTRAPMAG") S.A.R.L.
   (100%) France
St. Jude Resources Ltd. (100%) Canada
   St. Jude Resources (Ghana) Limited (100%) Ghana
        Fairstar (Ghana) Limited (100%) Ghana
   Hwini-Butre Minerals Ltd. (100%) Ghana
   Yatenga Holdings Limited (80%) Burkina Faso
</TABLE>
§ 129.23 Transport category cargo service airplanes: Increased zero fuel and landing weights. ( a ) Notwithstanding the applicable structural provisions of the transport category airworthiness regulations, but subject to paragraphs (b) through (g) of this section, a foreign air carrier may operate (for cargo service only) any of the following transport category airplanes (certificated under part 4b of the Civil Air Regulations effective before March 13, 1956) at increased zero fuel and landing weights— ( 1 ) DC-6A, DC-6B, DC-7B, and DC-7C; and
( 2 ) L-1049 B, C, D, E, F, G, and H, and the L-1649A when modified in accordance with supplemental type certificate SA 4-1402.
( b ) The zero fuel weight (maximum weight of the airplane with no disposable fuel and oil) and the structural landing weight may be increased beyond the maximum approved in full compliance with applicable rules only if the Administrator finds that— ( 1 ) The increase is not likely to reduce seriously the structural strength;
( 2 ) The probability of sudden fatigue failure is not noticeably increased;
( 3 ) The flutter, deformation, and vibration characteristics do not fall below those required by applicable regulations; and
( 4 ) All other applicable weight limitations will be met.
( c ) No zero fuel weight may be increased by more than five percent, and the increase in the structural landing weight may not exceed the amount, in pounds, of the increase in zero fuel weight.
( d ) Each airplane must be inspected in accordance with the approved special inspection procedures, for operations at increased weights, established and issued by the manufacturer of the type of airplane.
( e ) A foreign air carrier may not operate an airplane under this section unless the country of registry requires the airplane to be operated in accordance with the passenger-carrying transport category performance operating limitations in part 121 or the equivalent.
( f ) The Airplane Flight Manual for each airplane operated under this section must be appropriately revised to include the operating limitations and information needed for operation at the increased weights.
( g ) Each airplane operated at an increased weight under this section must, before it is used in passenger service, be inspected under the special inspection procedures for return to passenger service established and issued by the manufacturer and approved by the Administrator.
[Doc. No. 6403, 29 FR 19098, Dec. 30, 1964]
#### § 27.171 Stability: general.

The rotorcraft must be able to be flown, without undue pilot fatigue or strain, in any normal maneuver for a period of time as long as that expected in normal operation. At least three landings and takeoffs must be made during this demonstration.
From: Fitzsimmons, Catharine [DNR] [ mailto:Catharine.Fitzsimmons@dnr.iowa.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:58 PM

To: Tapp, Joshua

Cc: Algoe

- Eakin, Amy; McGraw, Jim [DNR]; Paulson, Christine [DNR]

Subject: Request to amend SIP revision request for Linn County ordinance updates

September 18, 2014

Dear Josh:

On August 15, 2014, Iowa DNR amended the SIP revision requests for Linn County o rdinance

updates submitted for SIP revisions during the period 2008

- 2013. This email amends the August

15, 2014, request and asks EPA to take no action on the definition of “Significant” under Linn

County ordinance 10.2 as it relates to PM2.5.

Linn Cou nty has already updated this definition in their FY15 rulemaking that is currently under

consideration by the Linn County Board of Health. Linn County will default to the state’s definition

until their rulemaking is completed. Inclusion of this definitio n update in the Iowa SIP will be

requested in a future SIP revision request to EPA.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Please contact Jim McGraw (515

- 725

- 9543) of my

staff if you have questions or need additional information.

Sincerely,



## - Catharine

Catharine Fitzsimmons, Air Quality Bureau Chief

Iowa Department of Natural Resources

P 515.725.9534 | F 515.725.9501 |

catharine.fitzsimmons@dnr.iowa.gov

Air Quality Bureau | 7900 Hickman Rd., Ste. 1 | Windsor

Heights, IA 50324

www.IowaCleanAir.gov | Air Construction Permit Hotline

877.247.4692

WWW.IOWADNR.GOV

Leading Iowans in Caring for Our Natural Resources.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 3 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 4 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 D

Exhibit Page 5 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 6 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 7 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 D

Exhibit Page 8 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 9 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 10 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 11 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 12 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 13 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24817-1 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 13:23:07 Desc:

Exhibit Page 14 of 14
#### KELLEY v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 1, 1915.)

Appeal from Morgan Law sind Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. Thomas W. Wert.

G. O. Chenault, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and W. H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Thomas, J.

Appeal dismissed under Rule 43, on the authority of *Rivers v. State, infra,*69 South. 387.