# Official Journal C 148/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 148 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6229 April 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 148

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6229 April 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2019/C 148/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2019/C 148/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | CDJ |
| 2019/C 148/02 | Case C-420/16 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 March 2019 — Balázs-Árpád Izsák, Attila Dabis v European Commission, Hungary, Hellenic Republic, Romania, Slovak Republic (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Citizens’ initiative — Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Registration of the proposed citizens’ initiative — Article 4(2)(b) — Condition that the proposed initiative does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act for the purpose of implementing the Treaties — Burden of proof — Economic, social and territorial cohesion — Article 174 TFEU — Citizens’ initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ — Application for registration — Refusal by the Commission) | 2 |
| 2019/C 148/03 | Case C-349/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Ringkonnakohus — Estonia) — Eesti Pagar AS v Ettevõtluse Arendamise Sihtasutus, Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 (General block exemption regulation) — Article 8(2) — Aid with an incentive effect — Concept of ‘start of work on the project’ — Powers of the national authorities — Unlawful aid — No decision of the European Commission or of a national court — Obligation on the national authorities to recover unlawful aid on their own initiative — Legal basis — Article 108(3) TFEU — General principle of EU law of protection of legitimate expectations — Decision of the competent national authority granting aid under Regulation No 800/2008 — Knowledge of circumstances excluding the eligibility of the aid application — Creation of a legitimate expectation — None — Limitation — Aid co-financed from a structural fund — Applicable legislation — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — National legislation — Interest — Obligation to claim interest — Legal basis — Article 108(3) TFEU — Applicable legislation — National rules — Principle of effectiveness) | 3 |
| 2019/C 148/04 | Case C-643/17: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Suez II Water Technologies & Solutions Portugal, Unipessoal Lda, formerly GE Power Controls Portugal Unipessoal, Lda v Fazenda Pública (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Article 37 — Community Customs Code — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Article 313 — Customs status of goods — Presumption of the Community status of goods) | 4 |
| 2019/C 148/05 | Case C-693/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2019 — BMB sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Ferrero SpA (Appeal — Community design — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Article 25(1)(e) — Invalidity proceedings — Design representing comfit boxes for sweets — Declaration of invalidity) | 5 |
| 2019/C 148/06 | Case C-728/17 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 March 2019 — European Commission v Alain Laurent Brouillard (Appeal — Civil service — Recruitment — Competitions — Conditions for admission — Diplomas and level of education required — Open competition EPSO/AD/306/15 — Pre-selection of candidates on the basis of their applications — Level of education corresponding to full legal education completed in a Belgian, French, or Luxembourg higher-education institution — ‘Master 2’ diploma (master’s degree) in law, economics and management, private law, lawyer-linguist specialism — Issued following ‘accreditation of skills gained through experience’ — Rejection of the application) | 6 |
| 2019/C 148/07 | Case C-392/18 P: Appeal brought on 13 June 2018 by Mauro Bettani against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 24 April 2018 in Case T-80/18, Bettani v Commission | 6 |
| 2019/C 148/08 | Case C-757/18 P: Appeal brought on 3 December 2018 by M-Sansz Kereskedelmi, Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. (M-Sansz Kft.) against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 28 September 2018 in Case T-709/17 M-Sansz v Commission | 7 |
| 2019/C 148/09 | Case C-809/18 P: Appeal brought on 20 December 2018 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 15 October 2018 in Case T-7/17: John Mills v EUIPO | 8 |
| 2019/C 148/10 | Case C-818/18 P: Appeal brought on 21 December 2018 by The Yokohama Rubber Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 24 October 2018 in Case T-447/16: Pirelli Tyre v EUIPO | 9 |
| 2019/C 148/11 | Case C-825/18 P: Appeal brought on 28 December 2018 by Mamas and Papas Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 23 October 2018 in Case T-672/17: Mamas and Papas v EUIPO | 11 |
| 2019/C 148/12 | Case C-6/19 P: Appeal brought on 04 January 2019 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 24 October 2018 in Case T-447/16: Pirelli Tyre v EUIPO | 12 |
| 2019/C 148/13 | Case C-13/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza (Spain) lodged on 9 January 2019 — Ibercaja Banco, S.A. v TJ and UK | 13 |
| 2019/C 148/14 | Case C-48/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 25 January 2019 — X-GmbH v Z Tax Office | 14 |
| 2019/C 148/15 | Case C-56/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by RFA International, LP against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 15 November 2018 in Case T-113/15: RFA International v Commission | 15 |
| 2019/C 148/16 | Case C-57/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 15 November 2018 in Case T-793/14: Tempus Energy and Tempus Energy Technology v Commission | 16 |
| 2019/C 148/17 | Case C-74/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa — Juízo Local Cível de Lisboa — Juiz 18 (Portugal) lodged on 31 January 2019 — LE v Transport Aéreos Portugueses S.A. | 18 |
| 2019/C 148/18 | Case C-80/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 4 February 2019 —E. E. | 18 |
| 2019/C 148/19 | Case C-105/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Serron (Greece) lodged on 8 February 2019 — WP v Trapeza Peiraios AE | 20 |
| 2019/C 148/20 | Case C-113/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 February 2019 — Luxaviation SA v Ministre de l’Environnement | 21 |
| 2019/C 148/21 | Case C-117/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Mokestinių ginčų komisija prie Lietuvos Respublikos vyriausybės (Lithuania) lodged on 15 February 2019 — AB ‘Linas Agro’ v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos | 22 |
| 2019/C 148/22 | Case C-130/19: Action brought on 15 February 2019 — European Court of Auditors v Karel Pinxten | 24 |
| 2019/C 148/23 | Case C-144/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 February 2019 by Lupin Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-680/14: Lupin v Commission | 24 |
| 2019/C 148/24 | Case C-145/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 February 2019 by Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-358/17: Mubarak v Council | 26 |
| 2019/C 148/25 | Case C-146/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 21 February 2019 — SCT, d.d., in bankruptcy v Republic of Slovenia | 27 |
| 2019/C 148/26 | Case C-149/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava V (Slovakia) lodged on 22 February 2019 — Criminal proceedings against R.B. | 28 |
| 2019/C 148/27 | Case C-151/19 P: Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-684/14: Krka v Commission | 29 |
| 2019/C 148/28 | Case C-161/19: Action brought on 22 February 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Austria | 30 |
| 2019/C 148/29 | Case C-164/19 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2019 by Niche Generics Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-701/14: Niche Generics v Commission | 31 |
| 2019/C 148/30 | Case C-165/19 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2019 by Slovak Telekom, a.s. against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-851/14: Slovak Telekom v Commission | 32 |
| 2019/C 148/31 | Case C-166/19 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2019 by Unichem Laboratories Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-705/14: Unichem Laboratories v Commission | 33 |
| 2019/C 148/32 | Case C-173/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 February 2019 by Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-890/16: Scandlines Danmark and Scandlines Deutschland v Commission | 34 |
| 2019/C 148/33 | Case C-174/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 February 2019 by Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-630/15: Scandlines Danmark and Scandlines Deutschland v Commission | 35 |
| 2019/C 148/34 | Case C-175/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 February 2019 by Stena Line Scandinavia AB against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-631/15: Stena Line Scandinavia v Commission | 37 |
| 2019/C 148/35 | Case C-183/19 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2019 by Fruits de Ponent, S.C.C.L. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-290/16, Fruits de Ponent v Commission | 38 |
| | GCEU |
| 2019/C 148/36 | Case T-716/14: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — Tweedale v EFSA (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to toxicity studies conducted in connection with the renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Overriding public interest — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Concept of information relating to emissions into the environment) | 40 |
| 2019/C 148/37 | Case T-135/15: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Italy v Commission (EAGF — Expenses excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Italy — Temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry — Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 — Regulation(EC) No 968/2006 — Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 — Time limit of 24 months — Concept of ‘multiannual measure’ — Conditions for granting restructuring aid — Concept of ‘production facility’ — Classification of silos — Concept of‘complete dismantling’ — Annex 2 to Document VI/5330/97 — Problems in interpreting EU legislation — Cooperation in good faith — Legitimate expectations — Ne bis in idem — Slaughter premiums — Information and promotion campaigns for agricultural products — Late payments — Evidence of the existence of specific management conditions — Equal treatment — Mistranslation in one of the language versions of an EU regulation — Whether the Member State is answerable for the financial correction) | 41 |
| 2019/C 148/38 | Case T-139/15: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Hungary v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGF — Sugar — Temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the European Community — Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 — Regulation (EC) No 968/2006 — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Hungary — Conditions for the grant of aid for full dismantling and aid for partial dismantling — Concept of ‘production facilities’ — Assessment of the use of silos on the date of submission of the application for aid — Concept of ‘full dismantling’ — Annex 2 to document VI/5330/97 — Difficulties in the interpretation of EU legislation — Cooperation in good faith) | 42 |
| 2019/C 148/39 | Case T-156/15: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — France v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by France — Area-related aid scheme — Procedural safeguards — Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 — Concept of ‘permanent pasture’ — Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 — National control system based on a definition of forage areas which is not consistent with EU law — Exclusion of all the expenditure — Proportionality — Metropolitan France’s rural development programme — Rural development support measures — Areas with natural handicaps — Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 — Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 — Flat-rate financial correction — On-the-spot checks — Loading criterion — Counting of animals — Temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry — Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 — Regulation (EC) No 968/2006 — Conditions for the grant of restructuring aid — Concept of ‘production facilities’ — Assessment of the use of silos on the date of submission of the aid application — Concept of‘full dismantling’ — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Annex 2 to document VI/5330/97) | 43 |
| 2019/C 148/40 | Case T-730/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2019 — Espírito Santo Financial Group v ECB (Access to documents — Decision 2004/258/EC — Documents relating to the ECB’s decision of 1 August 2014 concerning Banco Espírito Santo SA — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the confidentiality of the proceedings of the ECB’s decision-making bodies — Exception relating to the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a Member State — Exception relating to the stability of the financial system in the European Union or in a Member State — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Exception relating to documents intended for internal use — Obligation to state reasons) | 44 |
| 2019/C 148/41 | Case T-799/16: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Xiaomi v EUIPO — Dudingen Develops (MI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MI — Earlier EU figurative mark MI — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)) | 45 |
| 2019/C 148/42 | Case T-837/16: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — Sweden v Commission (REACH — Commission decision authorising the use of lead sulfochromate yellow and of lead chromate molybdate sulfate red — Article 60(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Consideration of the unavailability of alternatives — Error in law) | 46 |
| 2019/C 148/43 | Case T-59/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — L v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistant — Termination of the contract — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Outside activity — Manifest error of assessment — Claim for damages) | 47 |
| 2019/C 148/44 | Case T-329/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 –Hautala and Others v EFSA (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to carcinogenicity studies conducted in connection with the renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Overriding public interest — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Concept of information relating to emissions into the environment) | 47 |
| 2019/C 148/45 | Case T-446/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — TK v Parliament (Civil service — Temporary agents — Change in the activities assigned — Concept of concern — Invitation to an interview — Concept of proceedings — Allegation of psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Liability — Non-material damage) | 48 |
| 2019/C 148/46 | Case T-798/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — De Masi and Varoufakis v ECB (Access to documents — Decision 2004/258/EC — Document entitled ‘Responses to questions concerning the interpretation of Article 14.4. of the Statute of the ESCB and the ECB’ — Denial of access — Exception relating to the protection of legal advice — Exception relating to the protection of documents intended for internal use — Overriding public interest) | 49 |
| 2019/C 148/47 | Case T-26/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — France v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by France — One-off and flat-rate financial corrections — Area-related aid scheme — Land Parcel Identification System — Determination of eligible areas — Maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition — Landscape features — Grazable heathland — National monitoring system based on a non-compliant definition of eligible areas — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons — Conformity Clearance — Most likely error — Error of law) | 50 |
| 2019/C 148/48 | Case T-106/18: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — Laverana v EUIPO — Agroecopark (VERA GREEN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark VERA GREEN — Earlier EU word mark LAVERA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 51 |
| 2019/C 148/49 | Case T-297/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2019 — Wirecard Technologies v EUIPO — Striatum Ventures (supr) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark supr — Earlier Benelux word mark Zupr — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 51 |
| 2019/C 148/50 | Case T-463/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Novartis v EUIPO (SMARTSURFACE) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark SMARTSURFACE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 52 |
| 2019/C 148/51 | Case T-326/18: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2019 — Herrero Torres v EUIPO — DZ Licores (CARAJILLO LICOR 43 CUARENTA Y TRES) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark CARAJILLO LICOR 43 CUARENTA Y TRES — Earlier national figurative mark Carajillo — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 53 |
| 2019/C 148/52 | Case T-125/19: Action brought on 20 February 2019 — Clem & Jo Optique v EUIPO — C&A (C&J) | 54 |
| 2019/C 148/53 | Case T-126/19: Action brought on 21 February 2019. — Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Chłodnictwa i Klimatyzacji v Commission | 54 |
| 2019/C 148/54 | Case T-131/19: Action brought on 25 February 2019 — Oosterbosch v Parliament | 55 |
| 2019/C 148/55 | Case T-132/19: Action brought on 26 February 2019 — Ashworth v Parliament | 56 |
| 2019/C 148/56 | Case T-135/19: Action brought on 1 March 2019 — Corporació Catalana de Mitjans Audiovisuals v EUIPO — Dalmat (LaTV3D) | 58 |
| 2019/C 148/57 | Case T-137/19: Action brought on 28 February 2019 — Souruh v Council | 58 |
| 2019/C 148/58 | Case T-138/19: Action brought on 14 February 2019 — WH v EUIPO | 59 |
| 2019/C 148/59 | Case T-141/19: Action brought on 4 March 2019 — Sabo and Others v Parliament and Council | 60 |
| 2019/C 148/60 | Case T-142/19: Action brought on 1 March 2019 — Nosio v EUIPO — Passi (PASSIATA) | 60 |
| 2019/C 148/61 | Case T-143/19: Action brought on 2 March 2019 — Solar Ileias Bompaina v Commission | 61 |
| 2019/C 148/62 | Case T-147/19: Action brought on 6 March 2019 — Flovax v EUIPO — Dagniaux and Gervais Danone (GLACIER DAGNIAUX DEPUIS 1923) | 62 |
| 2019/C 148/63 | Case T-156/19: Action brought on 12 March 2019 — Koenig & Bauer v EUIPO (we’re on it) | 63 |
| 2019/C 148/64 | Case T-507/16: Order of the General Court of 1 March 2019 — Baradel and Others v EIF | 64 |
| 2019/C 148/65 | Case T-760/18: Order of the General Court of 15 February 2019 — Intercontinental Exchange Holdings v EUIPO — New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX BRENT) | 64 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

CDJ

2019/C 148/02

Case C-420/16 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 March 2019 — Balázs-Árpád Izsák, Attila Dabis v European Commission, Hungary, Hellenic Republic, Romania, Slovak Republic (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Citizens’ initiative — Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Registration of the proposed citizens’ initiative — Article 4(2)(b) — Condition that the proposed initiative does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act for the purpose of implementing the Treaties — Burden of proof — Economic, social and territorial cohesion — Article 174 TFEU — Citizens’ initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ — Application for registration — Refusal by the Commission)

2

2019/C 148/03

Case C-349/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Ringkonnakohus — Estonia) — Eesti Pagar AS v Ettevõtluse Arendamise Sihtasutus, Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 (General block exemption regulation) — Article 8(2) — Aid with an incentive effect — Concept of ‘start of work on the project’ — Powers of the national authorities — Unlawful aid — No decision of the European Commission or of a national court — Obligation on the national authorities to recover unlawful aid on their own initiative — Legal basis — Article 108(3) TFEU — General principle of EU law of protection of legitimate expectations — Decision of the competent national authority granting aid under Regulation No 800/2008 — Knowledge of circumstances excluding the eligibility of the aid application — Creation of a legitimate expectation — None — Limitation — Aid co-financed from a structural fund — Applicable legislation — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — National legislation — Interest — Obligation to claim interest — Legal basis — Article 108(3) TFEU — Applicable legislation — National rules — Principle of effectiveness)

3

2019/C 148/04

Case C-643/17: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Suez II Water Technologies & Solutions Portugal, Unipessoal Lda, formerly GE Power Controls Portugal Unipessoal, Lda v Fazenda Pública (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Article 37 — Community Customs Code — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Article 313 — Customs status of goods — Presumption of the Community status of goods)

4

2019/C 148/05

Case C-693/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2019 — BMB sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Ferrero SpA (Appeal — Community design — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Article 25(1)(e) — Invalidity proceedings — Design representing comfit boxes for sweets — Declaration of invalidity)

5

2019/C 148/06

Case C-728/17 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 March 2019 — European Commission v Alain Laurent Brouillard (Appeal — Civil service — Recruitment — Competitions — Conditions for admission — Diplomas and level of education required — Open competition EPSO/AD/306/15 — Pre-selection of candidates on the basis of their applications — Level of education corresponding to full legal education completed in a Belgian, French, or Luxembourg higher-education institution — ‘Master 2’ diploma (master’s degree) in law, economics and management, private law, lawyer-linguist specialism — Issued following ‘accreditation of skills gained through experience’ — Rejection of the application)

6

2019/C 148/07

Case C-392/18 P: Appeal brought on 13 June 2018 by Mauro Bettani against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 24 April 2018 in Case T-80/18, Bettani v Commission

6

2019/C 148/08

Case C-757/18 P: Appeal brought on 3 December 2018 by M-Sansz Kereskedelmi, Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. (M-Sansz Kft.) against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 28 September 2018 in Case T-709/17 M-Sansz v Commission

7

2019/C 148/09

Case C-809/18 P: Appeal brought on 20 December 2018 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 15 October 2018 in Case T-7/17: John Mills v EUIPO

8

2019/C 148/10

Case C-818/18 P: Appeal brought on 21 December 2018 by The Yokohama Rubber Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 24 October 2018 in Case T-447/16: Pirelli Tyre v EUIPO

9

2019/C 148/11

Case C-825/18 P: Appeal brought on 28 December 2018 by Mamas and Papas Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 23 October 2018 in Case T-672/17: Mamas and Papas v EUIPO

11

2019/C 148/12

Case C-6/19 P: Appeal brought on 04 January 2019 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 24 October 2018 in Case T-447/16: Pirelli Tyre v EUIPO

12

2019/C 148/13

Case C-13/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza (Spain) lodged on 9 January 2019 — Ibercaja Banco, S.A. v TJ and UK

13

2019/C 148/14

Case C-48/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 25 January 2019 — X-GmbH v Z Tax Office

14

2019/C 148/15

Case C-56/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by RFA International, LP against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 15 November 2018 in Case T-113/15: RFA International v Commission

15

2019/C 148/16

Case C-57/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 15 November 2018 in Case T-793/14: Tempus Energy and Tempus Energy Technology v Commission

16

2019/C 148/17

Case C-74/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa — Juízo Local Cível de Lisboa — Juiz 18 (Portugal) lodged on 31 January 2019 — LE v Transport Aéreos Portugueses S.A.

18

2019/C 148/18

Case C-80/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 4 February 2019 —E. E.

18

2019/C 148/19

Case C-105/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Serron (Greece) lodged on 8 February 2019 — WP v Trapeza Peiraios AE

20

2019/C 148/20

Case C-113/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 February 2019 — Luxaviation SA v Ministre de l’Environnement

21

2019/C 148/21

Case C-117/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Mokestinių ginčų komisija prie Lietuvos Respublikos vyriausybės (Lithuania) lodged on 15 February 2019 — AB ‘Linas Agro’ v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

22

2019/C 148/22

Case C-130/19: Action brought on 15 February 2019 — European Court of Auditors v Karel Pinxten

24

2019/C 148/23

Case C-144/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 February 2019 by Lupin Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-680/14: Lupin v Commission

24

2019/C 148/24

Case C-145/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 February 2019 by Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-358/17: Mubarak v Council

26

2019/C 148/25

Case C-146/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 21 February 2019 — SCT, d.d., in bankruptcy v Republic of Slovenia

27

2019/C 148/26

Case C-149/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava V (Slovakia) lodged on 22 February 2019 — Criminal proceedings against R.B.

28

2019/C 148/27

Case C-151/19 P: Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-684/14: Krka v Commission

29

2019/C 148/28

Case C-161/19: Action brought on 22 February 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

30

2019/C 148/29

Case C-164/19 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2019 by Niche Generics Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-701/14: Niche Generics v Commission

31

2019/C 148/30

Case C-165/19 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2019 by Slovak Telekom, a.s. against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-851/14: Slovak Telekom v Commission

32

2019/C 148/31

Case C-166/19 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2019 by Unichem Laboratories Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-705/14: Unichem Laboratories v Commission

33

2019/C 148/32

Case C-173/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 February 2019 by Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-890/16: Scandlines Danmark and Scandlines Deutschland v Commission

34

2019/C 148/33

Case C-174/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 February 2019 by Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-630/15: Scandlines Danmark and Scandlines Deutschland v Commission

35

2019/C 148/34

Case C-175/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 February 2019 by Stena Line Scandinavia AB against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-631/15: Stena Line Scandinavia v Commission

37

2019/C 148/35

Case C-183/19 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2019 by Fruits de Ponent, S.C.C.L. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-290/16, Fruits de Ponent v Commission

38

GCEU

2019/C 148/36

Case T-716/14: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — Tweedale v EFSA (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to toxicity studies conducted in connection with the renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Overriding public interest — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Concept of information relating to emissions into the environment)

40

2019/C 148/37

Case T-135/15: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Italy v Commission (EAGF — Expenses excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Italy — Temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry — Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 — Regulation(EC) No 968/2006 — Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 — Time limit of 24 months — Concept of ‘multiannual measure’ — Conditions for granting restructuring aid — Concept of ‘production facility’ — Classification of silos — Concept of‘complete dismantling’ — Annex 2 to Document VI/5330/97 — Problems in interpreting EU legislation — Cooperation in good faith — Legitimate expectations — Ne bis in idem — Slaughter premiums — Information and promotion campaigns for agricultural products — Late payments — Evidence of the existence of specific management conditions — Equal treatment — Mistranslation in one of the language versions of an EU regulation — Whether the Member State is answerable for the financial correction)

41

2019/C 148/38

Case T-139/15: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Hungary v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGF — Sugar — Temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the European Community — Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 — Regulation (EC) No 968/2006 — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Hungary — Conditions for the grant of aid for full dismantling and aid for partial dismantling — Concept of ‘production facilities’ — Assessment of the use of silos on the date of submission of the application for aid — Concept of ‘full dismantling’ — Annex 2 to document VI/5330/97 — Difficulties in the interpretation of EU legislation — Cooperation in good faith)

42

2019/C 148/39

Case T-156/15: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — France v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by France — Area-related aid scheme — Procedural safeguards — Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 — Concept of ‘permanent pasture’ — Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 — National control system based on a definition of forage areas which is not consistent with EU law — Exclusion of all the expenditure — Proportionality — Metropolitan France’s rural development programme — Rural development support measures — Areas with natural handicaps — Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 — Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 — Flat-rate financial correction — On-the-spot checks — Loading criterion — Counting of animals — Temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry — Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 — Regulation (EC) No 968/2006 — Conditions for the grant of restructuring aid — Concept of ‘production facilities’ — Assessment of the use of silos on the date of submission of the aid application — Concept of‘full dismantling’ — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Annex 2 to document VI/5330/97)

43

2019/C 148/40

Case T-730/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2019 — Espírito Santo Financial Group v ECB (Access to documents — Decision 2004/258/EC — Documents relating to the ECB’s decision of 1 August 2014 concerning Banco Espírito Santo SA — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the confidentiality of the proceedings of the ECB’s decision-making bodies — Exception relating to the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a Member State — Exception relating to the stability of the financial system in the European Union or in a Member State — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Exception relating to documents intended for internal use — Obligation to state reasons)

44

2019/C 148/41

Case T-799/16: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Xiaomi v EUIPO — Dudingen Develops (MI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MI — Earlier EU figurative mark MI — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))

45

2019/C 148/42

Case T-837/16: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — Sweden v Commission (REACH — Commission decision authorising the use of lead sulfochromate yellow and of lead chromate molybdate sulfate red — Article 60(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Consideration of the unavailability of alternatives — Error in law)

46

2019/C 148/43

Case T-59/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — L v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistant — Termination of the contract — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Outside activity — Manifest error of assessment — Claim for damages)

47

2019/C 148/44

Case T-329/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 –Hautala and Others v EFSA (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to carcinogenicity studies conducted in connection with the renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Overriding public interest — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Concept of information relating to emissions into the environment)

47

2019/C 148/45

Case T-446/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — TK v Parliament (Civil service — Temporary agents — Change in the activities assigned — Concept of concern — Invitation to an interview — Concept of proceedings — Allegation of psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Liability — Non-material damage)

48

2019/C 148/46

Case T-798/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — De Masi and Varoufakis v ECB (Access to documents — Decision 2004/258/EC — Document entitled ‘Responses to questions concerning the interpretation of Article 14.4. of the Statute of the ESCB and the ECB’ — Denial of access — Exception relating to the protection of legal advice — Exception relating to the protection of documents intended for internal use — Overriding public interest)

49

2019/C 148/47

Case T-26/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — France v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by France — One-off and flat-rate financial corrections — Area-related aid scheme — Land Parcel Identification System — Determination of eligible areas — Maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition — Landscape features — Grazable heathland — National monitoring system based on a non-compliant definition of eligible areas — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons — Conformity Clearance — Most likely error — Error of law)

50

2019/C 148/48

Case T-106/18: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — Laverana v EUIPO — Agroecopark (VERA GREEN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark VERA GREEN — Earlier EU word mark LAVERA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

51

2019/C 148/49

Case T-297/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2019 — Wirecard Technologies v EUIPO — Striatum Ventures (supr) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark supr — Earlier Benelux word mark Zupr — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

51

2019/C 148/50

Case T-463/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Novartis v EUIPO (SMARTSURFACE) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark SMARTSURFACE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

52

2019/C 148/51

Case T-326/18: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2019 — Herrero Torres v EUIPO — DZ Licores (CARAJILLO LICOR 43 CUARENTA Y TRES) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark CARAJILLO LICOR 43 CUARENTA Y TRES — Earlier national figurative mark Carajillo — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

53

2019/C 148/52

Case T-125/19: Action brought on 20 February 2019 — Clem & Jo Optique v EUIPO — C&A (C&J)

54

2019/C 148/53

Case T-126/19: Action brought on 21 February 2019. — Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Chłodnictwa i Klimatyzacji v Commission

54

2019/C 148/54

Case T-131/19: Action brought on 25 February 2019 — Oosterbosch v Parliament

55

2019/C 148/55

Case T-132/19: Action brought on 26 February 2019 — Ashworth v Parliament

56

2019/C 148/56

Case T-135/19: Action brought on 1 March 2019 — Corporació Catalana de Mitjans Audiovisuals v EUIPO — Dalmat (LaTV3D)

58

2019/C 148/57

Case T-137/19: Action brought on 28 February 2019 — Souruh v Council

58

2019/C 148/58

Case T-138/19: Action brought on 14 February 2019 — WH v EUIPO

59

2019/C 148/59

Case T-141/19: Action brought on 4 March 2019 — Sabo and Others v Parliament and Council

60

2019/C 148/60

Case T-142/19: Action brought on 1 March 2019 — Nosio v EUIPO — Passi (PASSIATA)

60

2019/C 148/61

Case T-143/19: Action brought on 2 March 2019 — Solar Ileias Bompaina v Commission

61

2019/C 148/62

Case T-147/19: Action brought on 6 March 2019 — Flovax v EUIPO — Dagniaux and Gervais Danone (GLACIER DAGNIAUX DEPUIS 1923)

62

2019/C 148/63

Case T-156/19: Action brought on 12 March 2019 — Koenig & Bauer v EUIPO (we’re on it)

63

2019/C 148/64

Case T-507/16: Order of the General Court of 1 March 2019 — Baradel and Others v EIF

64

2019/C 148/65

Case T-760/18: Order of the General Court of 15 February 2019 — Intercontinental Exchange Holdings v EUIPO — New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX BRENT)

64

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN