alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 158.15 Project eligibility at PFC levels of $1, $2, or $3. ( a ) To be eligible, a project must— ( 1 ) Preserve or enhance safety, security, or capacity of the national air transportation system;
( 2 ) Reduce noise or mitigate noise impacts resulting from an airport; or
( 3 ) Furnish opportunities for enhanced competition between or among air carriers.
( b ) Eligible projects are any of the following projects— ( 1 ) Airport development eligible under subchapter I of chapter 471 of 49 U.S.C.;
( 2 ) Airport planning eligible under subchapter I of chapter 471 of 49 U.S.C.;
( 3 ) Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d);
( 4 ) Airport noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505;
( 5 ) Noise compatibility measures eligible for Federal assistance under 49 U.S.C. 47504, without regard to whether the measures are approved under 49 U.S.C. 47504;
( 6 ) Construction of gates and related areas at which passengers are enplaned or deplaned and other areas directly related to the movement of passengers and baggage in air commerce within the boundaries of the airport. These areas do not include restaurants, car rental and automobile parking facilities, or other concessions. Projects required to enable added air service by an air carrier with less than 50 percent of the annual passenger boardings at an airport have added eligibility. Such projects may include structural foundations and floor systems, exterior building walls and load-bearing interior columns or walls, windows, door and roof systems, building utilities (including heating, air conditioning, ventilation, plumbing, and electrical service), and aircraft fueling facilities next to the gate;
( 7 ) A project approved under the FAA's “Program to Permit Cost-Sharing of Air Traffic Modernization Projects” under 49 U.S.C. 44517; or
( 8 ) If the airport is in an air quality nonattainment area (as defined by section 171(2) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7501(2)) or a maintenance area referred to in section 175A of such Act (42 U.S.C. 7505a), and the project will result in the airport receiving appropriate emission credits as described in 49 U.S.C. 47139, a project for: ( i ) Converting vehicles eligible under § 158.15(b)(1) and ground support equipment powered by a diesel or gasoline engine used at a commercial service airport to low-emission technology certified or verified by the Environmental Protection Agency to reduce emissions or to use cleaner burning conventional fuels; or
( ii ) Acquiring for use at a commercial service airport vehicles eligible under § 158.15(b)(1) and, subject to § 158.13(c), ground support equipment that include low-emission technology or use cleaner burning fuels.
( c ) An eligible project must be adequately justified to qualify for PFC funding.
[Doc. No. 26385, 56 FR 24278, May 29, 1991; 56 FR 37127, Aug. 2, 1991; Amdt. 158-2, 65 FR 34541, May 30, 2000; Amdt. 158-4, 72 FR 28848, May 23, 2007]
1

Schaeffer, John

From: Lin, Chuantung

Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 10:46 AM

To: Schaeffer, John

Cc: Lewis, Paul; Mattheisen, Mike; Njo, Heather; Brooks, David; Williamson, Tracy; Christian, 

Myrta

Subject: RE: 68187-76-8 HPV2 Physical Chemical study results for Review

Hi John, 

I have reviewed the physical chemicals properties endpoints of the test result submitted by the sponsor for 

the HPV2 test chemical. 

As the sponsor had indicated in the report that the test results for Melting Point (MP = -4oC) and Boiling Point 

(BP = 113oC) for this chemical were most likely obtained for the water content in the test substance. The 

purity of the test substance was ~74.4% wih water (24.3%), Sodium Sulphate (1.25%), and SO3 (5.58%) 

contents in it. The HPV2 Test Rule requires using a pure substance (~99%) in the testing methods. However, 

this HPV2 chemical could not be easily purified to a pure substance for testing and the product is also sold as it 

in the commerce, the test results and the test methods could be accepted (as the sponsor reported) to fulfill 

the test requirements for this HPV2 chemical (as long as the purity of the substance are clearly indicated). 

Please let me know if you have any question regarding this matter. 

Daniel

Daniel (Chuantung) Lin, Ph.D. 

Chemist, Industrial Chemistry Branch 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

US EPA 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (7406M) 

[Deliveries to: 1201 Constitution Ave., NW, EPA East (WJC) 5133E] 

Washington, DC 20460 

202-564-8584 (direct) 

202-564-8740 (branch) 

202-564-8679 (fax) 

From: Schaeffer, John 

Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 7:54 AM 

To: Lin, Chuantung 

Cc: Lewis, Paul; Mattheisen, Mike; Njo, Heather; Brooks, David 

Subject: 68187-76-8 HPV2 Physical Chemical study results for Review 

Daniel, good morning. 

Attached for your review for adequacy are TSCA section 4 study results for sulfated castor oil (CASRN 68187-76-8). The 

two required studies were for the melting point and boiling point endpoints—the report includes additional information. 
2

Please let me know when I might anticipate receiving you review if you think it will go past the end of this month 

(October). 

Thanks. 

John 

John Schaeffer 

Senior Biologist 

USEPA/OPPT/CCD/CITB 

1201 Constitution Ave, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Mail Code: 7405M 

Phone: 202-564-8173
Gormas, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Hello everyone, 

i)oT ~ otl- ;;_ ood.._- !IJ8& 

b CiT _ o >i _ :2. 6o6- C).{J'<t)._ 

Gormas, Michael (OST) 

Friday, October 24, 2014 2:19 PM 

'PAUL.KHERA@ALASKA.GOV'; 'michael.lukshin@alaska.gov'; 'Rich.Sewell@alaska.gov'; 

'patricia@pelicancity.org'; 'citytke@gmail.com'; 'angcityclerk@gmail.com'; 

'tanaku@msn.com'; 'strommedog54@gmail.com'; 'shearwaterak@aol.com'; 

'janedbutton@gmail.com'; 'alexandertcm@aol.com' 

scott@harrisair.com; 'Kent Craford'; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Essential Air Service at Angoon-Elfin Cove-Pelican-Tenakee 

Alaska Seaplanes EAS proposal Final with attachments 10-22-14.pdf; Harris Air EAS 

Angoon Tenakee Pelican.pdf 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Angoon-Elfin Cove-Pelican-Tenakee, AK, as well 

as give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant 

Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. 

We issued Order 2014-9-13 (September 22, 2014), requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EAS. In 

response to our request, we received two proposals: Alaska Seaplanes and Harris Aircraft Services, Inc. 

I have attached each air carrier's proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov 

soon. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later 

than Monday, November 24, 2014. Please send your comments directly via e-mail to michael.gormas@dot.gov. Also, 

please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list. 

Please direct all questions regarding these proposals to Michael Gormas at michael.gormas@dot.gov. 

Best Regards, 

Michael D. Gormas 

United States Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

202.366.1853 

1 

'•' 

. '.,.' 

......... .J
No. 16,642.

#### Gourley *v.*Embree.

Assignment op *Errors.*— Defect *in Parties.*— Assignment Unavailing.— If an assignment of errors fail to contain the names of all the parties affected by the judgment appealed from, the assignment will be defective and unavailing.

From the Gibson Circuit Court.

*W. M. Land*and *J. B. Gable,*for appellant.

*L. C. Embree,*for appellee.

Dailey, J.

This was an action, in the Gibson Circuit Court, by the appellee, Eleanor Embree, against the appellant, Eva Gourley, and Elisha R. Embree, George Kendle and Thomas R. Paxton, to enforce an alleged mortgage lien upon certain real estate.

The sixth rule of this court prescribes that “the assignment of errors shall contain the full names of the parties,” and it has been the consistent holding of this court that a failure to set forth the full names of all the parties to the judgment appealed from renders the assignment of error defective and unavailing. Elliott’s App. Proced., section 822.

The assignment of errors constitutes the appellant’s complaint in the Supreme Court, and by it he must bring the proper parties before the court, and properly set forth the causes upon which he relies for relief. A failure to do any of these things is fatal to his standing in court. He can not have a lawsuit by himself, nor can he select from the parties to the final judgment such as he chooses to name, and omit the others. He must name all who are affected by the judgment appealed from. If he has not done so, the assignment of error will be held unavailing whenever the defect is brought to the *83notice of the court. Elliott’s App. Proced., section 401; *Braden v. Leibenguth,*126 Ind. 336.

Filed March 14, 1894.

The assignment of error upon the record, in this case, names but two parties, Eva Gourley, the appellant, and Eleanor Embree, the appellee. A casual examination of the transcript discloses that the parties to the cause were Eleanor Embree, the plaintiff, and the defendants, Eva Gourley, Elisha R. Embree, George Eendle and Thomas R. Paxton. All the defendants appeared, filed their demurrers and answers, participated in the trial and were equally bound and affected by the final judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted. The names of Elisha R. Embree, George Kendle and Thomas R. Paxton are wholly omitted from the assignment of error, and for this reason no question is presented for decision.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
EXHIBIT 10.1

[esph_ex101001.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101002.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101003.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101004.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101005.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101006.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101007.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101008.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101009.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101010.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101011.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101012.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101013.jpg]



---

[esph_ex101014.jpg]
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.310 Inspections and tests. ( a ) Each applicant for or holder of a PMA must allow the FAA to inspect its quality system, facilities, technical data, and any manufactured articles and witness any tests, including any inspections or tests at a supplier facility, necessary to determine compliance with this subchapter.
( b ) Unless otherwise authorized by the FAA, the applicant or holder— ( 1 ) May not present any article to the FAA for an inspection or test unless compliance with § 21.303(b)(2) through (4) has been shown for that article; and
( 2 ) May not make any change to an article between the time that compliance with § 21.303(b)(2) through (4) is shown for that article and the time that the article is presented to the FAA for the inspection or test.
§ 713.4 What bond forms may a federally insured credit union use? ( a ) The NCUA Board must approve all bond forms before federally insured credit unions may use them.
( b ) Bond forms the NCUA Board has approved for use by federally insured credit union are listed on the NCUA's website, *http://www.ncua.gov ,* and may be used by federally insured credit unions without further NCUA approval. If you are unable to access the NCUA's website, you can obtain a current listing of approved bond forms by contacting the NCUA at (703) 518-6330.
( c ) Federally insured credit unions may not use any of the following without first receiving approval from the NCUA Board: ( 1 ) Any bond form that has been amended or changed since the time the NCUA Board approved the form; and
( 2 ) Any rider, endorsement, renewal, or other document that limits coverage of approved bond forms.
( d ) Approval on all bond forms expires after a period of 10 years from the date the NCUA Board approved or reapproved use of the bond form unless otherwise determined by the NCUA Board. Provided, however, that: ( 1 ) Any bond forms approved before 2019 will expire on January 1, 2029, unless otherwise determined by the NCUA Board; and
( 2 ) The NCUA reserves the right to review a bond form at any point after its approval.
[84 FR 35524, July 24, 2019]
Revised Point Source Emission for Canon City Second Revised Point Source Emission for Canon City Second10year Maintenance year Maintenance year Maintenance 

Plan.

Mark Komp Mark Komp to: Crystal Freeman 04/11/2011 04:44 PM

Crystal

I asked Dale Wells, the emission inventory contact person for the State's maintenance plans, to calculate 

projected emissions from Canon City's point sources using the sources allowable emissions . He has 

done the calculations and they appear in the attached spreadsheet. 

The spreadsheet shows a total PM-10 emission inventory for 2020 of 540.85 tons per year using allowable 

emissions or an increase of 37.9% in emissions when compared to the 2006 emissions of 392.2 tons/year.

Canon City's design day concentration is 56 ug/m3 (see page 10 of the Canon City technical support 

document, submitted to EPA on June 18, 2009) of PM-10. Roll forward the design day concentration by 

the projected 37.9% increase in emissions including allowables . This roll forward modeling shows a 2020 

concentration of 77.22 ug/m3.

56 ug/m3 x 1.379 = 77.22 ug/m3

Since 77.22 ug/m3 is below the 150 ug/m3 standard, maintenance is demonstrated through 2020.

This information is consistent with the attainment demonstration using allowables for the first 10 year 

maintenance plan for Canon City and eliminates the possibility of backsliding . Backsliding had become a 

concern when the State did not initially provide a maintenance demonstration using allowables in its 

Canon City maintenance plan submitted to EPA on June 18, 2009.

Mark

Mark Komp

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Air Program

AQ Planning Unit

Mail Code 8P-AR

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202-1129

E-Mail: komp.mark@epa.gov

(303) 312-6022

Fax: (303) 312-6064

----- Forwarded by Mark Komp/R8/USEPA/US on 04/11/2011 04:01 PM -----

From: "Wells, Dale M." <Dale.Wells@dphe.state.co.us>

To: Mark Komp/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 04/05/2011 02:00 PM

Subject: Revised Canon City Inventory

Mark,

I have attached a revised inventory for Canon City showing the potential emissions for point sources .

Dale
 CanonCityPM10pe.xls
§ 25.1581 General. ( a ) *Furnishing information.* An Airplane Flight Manual must be furnished with each airplane, and it must contain the following: ( 1 ) Information required by §§ 25.1583 through 25.1587.
( 2 ) Other information that is necessary for safe operation because of design, operating, or handling characteristics.
( 3 ) Any limitation, procedure, or other information established as a condition of compliance with the applicable noise standards of part 36 of this chapter.
( b ) *Approved information.* Each part of the manual listed in §§ 25.1583 through 25.1587, that is appropriate to the airplane, must be furnished, verified, and approved, and must be segregated, identified, and clearly distinguished from each unapproved part of that manual.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Each Airplane Flight Manual must include a table of contents if the complexity of the manual indicates a need for it.
[Amdt. 25-42, 43 FR 2323, Jan. 16, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29786, July 20, 1990]
#### NORED V. THE STATE.

(Decided February 12, 1914.)

Appeal from Covington Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
# Official Journal L 124/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 124 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6213 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 124

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6213 May 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/723 of 2 May 2019 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the standard model form to be used in the annual reports submitted by Member States (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/724 of 10 May 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 686/2012 as regards the nomination of rapporteur Member States and co-rapporteur Member States for the active substances glyphosate, lambda-cyhalothrin, imazamox and pendimethalin and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 as regards the possibility that a group of Member States assumes jointly the role of the rapporteur Member State (
  1
  ) | 32 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/723 of 2 May 2019 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the standard model form to be used in the annual reports submitted by Member States (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/724 of 10 May 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 686/2012 as regards the nomination of rapporteur Member States and co-rapporteur Member States for the active substances glyphosate, lambda-cyhalothrin, imazamox and pendimethalin and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 as regards the possibility that a group of Member States assumes jointly the role of the rapporteur Member State (
  1
  )

1

32

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130843-45 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MIDLAND COGENERATION VENTURE,

Petitioner-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130843-45 

 COA: 254636, 254745, 255066 

MTT: 00-242614 

CITY OF MIDLAND,

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
SERVED: FEBRUARY 12, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC -----'---------- ';,· IN THE MATTER OF LAUREL AVIONICS COMPANY

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0202 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013EA030023) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY 

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001



### John V. Sabel, Respondent's Counsel 

### Aviation Advisors, LLC 2512 Minton Drive Moon Township, PA 15108 TEL: 724-457-2513 ONE COPY



### Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

### Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258**F~:** 

### 718-995-5699 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941**F~:** 

### 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-0202 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
exv4w1w1



 



EXHIBIT 4.1.1


Amendment to CKE Restaurants, Inc.

1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan



       Section 3 of the CKE Restaurants, Inc. 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:



		
	 	     3.     Administration. The Plan shall be administered by the
Board or, in the discretion of the Board, by the Committee which
shall consist of not less than two persons to be appointed by, and
to serve at the pleasure of, the Board. No member of the Board or
Committee who is not an Employee shall be eligible to participate
in the Plan. An aggregate of 2,907,000 shares of Common Stock
shall be subject to the Plan, provided that such number shall be
automatically adjusted to reflect any stock split, reverse stock
split, stock dividend, recapitalization, merger, consolidation,
combination, reclassification or similar corporate change. The
Board or the Committee shall have full authority to construe,
interpret, apply and administer the Plan and to establish and
amend such rules and procedures as it deems necessary or
appropriate from time to time for the proper administration of the
Plan. In addition, the Board or the Committee may engage or hire
such persons, including without limitation, the Broker, to provide
administrative, recordkeeping and other similar services in
connection with its administration of the Plan, as it may deem
necessary or appropriate from time to time. The members of the
Board and the Committee and the officers of the Company shall be
entitled to rely upon all certificates and reports made by such
persons, including the Broker, and upon all opinions given by any
legal counsel or investment adviser selected or approved by the
Board or the Committee. The members of the Board and the
Committee and the officers of the Company shall be fully protected
in respect of any action taken or suffered to be taken by them in
good faith in reliance upon any such certificates, reports,
opinions or other advice of any such person, and all action so
taken or suffered shall be conclusive upon each of them and upon
all Participants. The Company shall indemnify each member of the
Board and the Committee and any other officer or employee of the
Company who is designated to carry out any responsibilities under
the Plan for any liability arising out of or connected with his or
her duties hereunder, except such liability as may arise from such
person’s gross negligence or willful misconduct.
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Richard Rubin, CEO, CFO and
Chairman of Peregrine Industries, Inc, a Florida corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of Peregrine Industries, Inc. and results of its
operations.

Date: September 29, 2006/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman