alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GenoMed, Inc. Exhibit 10.19



Exhibit 10.19


                              Contract to Serve on
                       GenoMed's Scientific Advisory Board


Date: 12/11/02



By my signature below I agree to serve as a member of the Scientific Advisory
Board (SAB) of GenoMed, LLC; (the "Company").


I understand and agree that my commitment to the Company is limited to the
following items:


     a. From time to time, to provide advice, consultation or assistance via
telephone conversation, email or FAX.

     b. To provide GenoMed with my curriculum vitae, of which a brief summary,
subject to my final editorial consent, will be included on GenoMed's website (at
www.genomedics.com).

     I understand and agree that I will not at any time or in any manner,
either directly or indirectly, divulge, disclose, or communicate in any manner
any information that is proprietary to the Company. I will protect such
information and treat it as strictly confidential.

     I understand that, as a member of the Company's Scientific Advisory Board,
I may be invited by the Company to participate in additional projects, such as
helping to explain the company's scientific approach to various funding entities
such as venture capital firms, or to analyze the company's scientific data, but
that these additional projects will be negotiated on a case by case basis, and
that I am in no way obligated to perform such duties by the current contract.


     I understand and agree that the Scientific Advisory Board Contract will be
a five (5) year agreement, but that it can be terminated on 30 days' written
notice by either party for any reason whatsoever. The compensation for my
services will be paid by the Company as follows:


1. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company, exercisable upon
the first anniversary from the date of this Contract.


2. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
second anniversary from the date of this Contract.


3. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
third anniversary from the date of this Contract.


4. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
fourth anniversary from the date of this Contract.


5. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
fifth anniversary from the date of this Contract.




Signed:/s/ Sergio Danilov                    Date 12/11/02


For GenoMed, Inc:
Signed:/s/ David W. Moskowitz                Date Dec. 11, 2002
§ 136.13 Performance plan. ( a ) Each operator that uses a rotorcraft must complete a performance plan before each commercial air tour or flight operated under § 91.146 or § 91.147 of this chapter. The pilot in command must review for accuracy and comply with the performance plan on the day the flight occurs. The performance plan must be based on information in the approved aircraft flight manual for that aircraft taking into consideration the maximum density altitude for which the operation is planned, in order to determine: ( 1 ) Maximum gross weight and center of gravity (CG) limitations for hovering in ground effect;
( 2 ) Maximum gross weight and CG limitations for hovering out of ground effect; and
( 3 ) Maximum combination of weight, altitude, and temperature for which height/velocity information in the approved aircraft flight manual is valid.
( b ) Except for the approach to and transition from a hover for the purpose of takeoff and landing, or during takeoff and landing, the pilot in command must make a reasonable plan to operate the rotorcraft outside of the caution/warning/avoid area of the limiting height/velocity diagram.
( c ) Except for the approach to and transition from a hover for the purpose of takeoff and landing, during takeoff and landing, or when necessary for safety of flight, the pilot in command must operate the rotorcraft in compliance with the plan described in paragraph (b) of this section.
[Docket No. FAA-2022-1563; Amdt. No. 136-2, 88 FR 48091, July 26, 2023]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Zaxis International Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ivo Heiden, CEO and CFO ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ivo Heiden

Ivo HeidenCEO and CFODated: May 13, 2011

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zaxis International Inc. and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
#### La Floridienne J. Buttgenbach and Company, Societe Anonyme, a Corporation under the laws of the Kingdom of Belgium, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

— The count sustained is as follows:

“Plaintiff alleges that defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fifty thousand ($50,000.00) dollars *213for so much money received by the defendant for the use of the plaintiff.” This count is not in the language of the statutory form of a common count, Section 1150 Gen. Stats., but it is not fatally defective. A common count for money payable by the defendant to the plaintiff for money received by the defendant for the use of the plaintiff, for excess freight charges is "not required to state that the charges were unreasonable or excessive or were in excess of the prescribed rates. The statement in the bill of particulars that the charges complained of were in excess of the rates fixed by the Railroad Commissioners does not affect the right to use the common count for any proper recovery under it. The statute in express terms provides that the freight rates fixed by the Railroad Commissioners shall be held and deemed prima facie reasonable and just. The statutory penalties for violations of a prescribed rate cannot be enforced if it is shown that the prescribed rate is unreasonable.

A rehearing is denied.
**Exhibit      21.1**

| Name                of Subsidiary                             |   | Jurisdiction                of Incorporation |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |   |                                         |
| Hometown                Newburgh, Inc.                        |   | New                York                      |
| Newburgh                Realty Holding Co., Inc.              |   | New                York                      |
| Hometown                New Windsor, Inc.                     |   | New                York                      |
| Muller                Chevrolet, Isuzu, Inc.                  |   | New                Jersey                    |
| Muller                Automotive Group, Inc.                  |   | New                Jersey                    |
| Morristown                Auto Sales, Inc.                    |   | New                Jersey                    |
| Hometown                Emerson New Jersey, Inc.              |   | New                Jersey                    |
| ERR                Enterprises, Inc.                          |   | Connecticut                                  |
| Shaker’s                Inc.                            |   | Connecticut                                  |
| Family                Ford, Inc.                              |   | Connecticut                                  |
| Shaker’s                Lincoln/Mercury Auto Care, Inc. |   | Connecticut                                  |
| Hometown                Auto Framingham, Inc.                 |   | Massachusetts                                |
| Bay                State Realty Holdings, Inc.                |   | Massachusetts                                |
| Hometown                Brattleboro, Inc.                     |   | Vermont                                      |
| Brattleboro                Realty Holdings, Inc.              |   | Vermont                                      |

----
Yi Wan Form 10-K Exhibit 10.17



Exhibit 10.17


   Reply To The Transfer Of The Transfer Of The Stock Rights Of Jiaozuo Yi Wan
          Maple Leaf High Technology Agricultural Development Co., Ltd.


To Jiaozuo Yi Wan Maple Leaf High Technology Agricultural Development Co., Ltd.:

Your application for the transfer of the stock rights of Jiaozuo Yi Wan Maple
Leaf High Technology Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. has been examined. The
reply is as follows:

1.   We agree that the former cooperative parties of Yi Wan Maple Leaf High
     Technology Agricultural Development Co., Ltd.: Shun'ao Industry and
     Commerce Company of Shunde City and Yi Wan Group, Inc.can transfer their
     10% and 90% of stock rights respectively to Jiaozuo Linhai Development Co.,
     Ltd.

2.   We agree that the former cooperative parties of Yi Wan Maple Leaf High
     Technology Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. can fix a price for the right
     of land use, the buildings and other attached articles on the land and then
     transfer them to JiaozuoLinhai Development Co., Ltd.

3.   The former approval certificate of the cooperative companies (Certificate
     No. Wai Jing Mao Yu Fu Jiao Zi Zi <1998>0009) is invalid and taken back.

4.   All the registration procedures must be handled within the fixed time
     limit.

5.   The registration and documents for record should be presented to us in
     time.



                               Jiaozuo Foreign Trade Economic Cooperative Bureau
                                                                   Dec. 23, 2002




Key words: Stock Rights, Transfer, Reply

The Administrative Service Center of Jiaozuo Foreign Trade Economic Cooperative
Bureau

                                                         Issued on Dec. 23, 2002
#### C. C. Campbell, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *ex rel.*Lucy Harrison, *Defendant in Error.*

Where bastardy proceedings under the statute are instituted in the County Judge's court after the woman complainant has been “delivered” of the child, it is essential to the jurisdiction of the court, that it be made to duly appear that the complainant was delivered in the county of the forum.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*40*Daniel Campbell*& *Son,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*S. K. Gillis,*for Defendant in Error.

Whitfield, C. J.

This is a bastardly proceeding under Sections 2558 *et seq.*of the General Statutes of 1906. The statute provides that “when any single woman who shall be pregnant or delivered of a child, who by the law would be deemed and held a bastard, shall make complaint to the County Judge or the Justice of the Peace of the district where she may be so pregnant or delivered, and shall accuse any person of being the father of such child, such Justice shall issue a process,” &c. The affidavit of complaint and the process upon which the proceeding was begun, do not state that the woman was “delivered” in the county where the proceeding was begun. As the proceeding is purely statutory and as the statute authorizes the proceeding to be begun in the county or justice district “where she may be so pregnant or delivered,” a statement in the complaint and process that the woman was “delivered” in the county or district is essential to the jurisdiction of the court, where the complaint is not made until after the woman is “delivered” of the bastard child. See Ex part Hayes, 25 Fla. 279, 6 South. Rep. 64. A motion made to dismiss the proceeding for want of jurisdiction should have been granted since it did not appear that the bastard was “delivered” in Walton county where the proceeding was begun. This was not a mere technical defect in the complaint and process that may have been cured by proof that the bastard child was in fact delivered in Walton county, for it appears from the testimony of the complainant brought here in the record on writ of error that she was “delivered” of the bastard *41child in Jackson County, Florida, while the proceeding was begun and prosecuted in Walton County, Florida.

The judgment is reversed.

Taylor, Shackleford, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.
#### MALLETT v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 13, 1915.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on the record-.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.325 Export airworthiness approvals. ( a ) An export airworthiness approval for an aircraft is issued in the form of an export certificate of airworthiness. This certificate does not authorize operation of that aircraft.
( b ) The FAA prescribes the form and manner in which an export airworthiness approval for an aircraft engine, propeller, or article is issued.
( c ) If the FAA finds no undue burden in administering the applicable requirements of Title 49 U.S.C. and this subchapter, an export airworthiness approval may be issued for a product or article located outside of the United States.
###### Editorial Note on Part 211

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 211 appear at 61 FR 34725, July 3, 1996.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart D of Part 211

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart D of part 211 appear at 61 FR 34725, July 3, 1996.

#### § 211.35 Termination of eligibility.

The eligibility of a carrier owned or controlled, in whole or in part, by citizens of the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands or Palau, respectively, for issuance of a Freely Associated State Foreign Air Carrier Permit under this subpart shall exist only for such period as subparagraphs (a), (d), and (e) (eligibility for Freely Associated State essential air transportation subsidy compensation), or subparagraph (c) (limited interstate air transportation authority), of paragraph (5) of the Agreement on Civil Aviation Economic Services and Related Programs (Article IX of the Federal Programs and Services Agreement) remain in effect between the Government of those States and the Government of the United States, insofar as authority is conferred by such permits for purposes specified in those subparagraphs.

[Amdt. 211-18, 52 FR 5442, Feb. 22, 1987]
#### § 25.1421 Megaphones.

If a megaphone is installed, a restraining means must be provided that is capable of restraining the megaphone when it is subjected to the ultimate inertia forces specified in § 25.561(b)(3).

[Amdt. 25-41, 42 FR 36970, July 18, 1977]
#### SEALS PIANO CO. v. BELL, ET AL.

(Decided December 15th, 1914.)

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
t

a

th

A

t

e

8

Frances d

e

h

Frances

ll

a

k

R

s

e

e

Kimble Kimble Kimble c

)

i

u

A e n

m

r

s

rd n n P

B

w

Arde o

0 (

o

r

s

e

l

n

e

h

l

n C

Outcroppin

c o

g

Bru e ran lin 9

a

i

p

F k c

o

Iet

H

M

n

di

bur

Vaughn S

n

Vaughn e

e

ratz

dr

n

K n

a

t M

n

o

B

Kratz

y

o

R

G

e

e

e

u

t

r

o

Mitchell s

u

i

s

ll

w

k

n

ve

il

r

a

e

o

o

h

e

c

i

w

organ r

r M

t

l

a

A

N

o

iangle M

l

i

a

n

T v

s

M

g

F

a

J

i

S

y l

g

n

C

i

a

R an

l

i

u

H

Ryan

d

n

n

e

n

S

o

i

m

Phillip t

Phil ip Stone g

l e

w

O

n

e

r

Stone Gray Eagle

N

c

Murphy i hs

n

h

e

ar

g

Jansma

aW

ua

d

H

River

Ki

s

e

n

id

g

e

at g

Cambridge

t h

Brockton Sou

Arlin

¦§ ̈ I-90

gto

n

ta e o

o

Fron g t

criEllington

n

gn

M

i

n

h

o

s

gt

a

Arlin

W

drahc

n

s

r

r

g

O

ub

nil

o

li

C

B

Cr e Old Blu Son l ow

ora l

a

Wi

Q

sta

u

hS

anta

Bowman

Jellison

Bollinger n

Bl

e

u

d

e 

l

oa

C

ol e

re

C

st R

ek

re lcli

nari

H

Ma

er

Colli

yTurnberr Troo

Briarwood

t cPres wi k n

M

ncaid

acta

Ki

P

vi

e

s

s

n

wn

h

llec

urchill Do K

e

h

Ch

e

re

z

l

w T

e

s

z

o

Re

J n

ollo

xe

o

ne

e

H

D

e

Sta

H

r 

el

P

36 31 e

as

n

s

e

South Hills

Travel Management Area

Open to Motorcycles

Alternative C

R26E

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Miles

Map 129

Wyoming

T

1

S

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Map scale 1:40,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Ü Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Billings

90

iver

ne R

to ws

lo

el

Y

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

Streams

Bureau of Land Management

Yellowstone River

Private 

Public Lands Survey System

South Hills Travel Management Area

Roads
Sage-Grouse

Priority Habitat Management

Areas, Restoration Areas,

and General Habitat

Management Areas

WHEATLAND

MUSSELSHELL

GOLDEN

 VALLEY 

SWEET GRASS

YELLOWSTONE

STILLWATER

BIG HORN 

CARBON 

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü Wyoming

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Map scale 1:900,000

Miles

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in April 2015

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Map 23

Legend

Location Map

Montana

 Wyoming

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Counties

Public Lands Survey System

Sage-Grouse PHMA

Sage-Grouse Restoration Area

Sage Grouse GHMA

T

7

N

T

1

N

T

2

S

90

T

8

S

R18E R29E

R103W R93W T

57

N
§ 25.1505 Maximum operating limit speed. The maximum operating limit speed (*V* *MO*/*M* *MO* airspeed or Mach Number, whichever is critical at a particular altitude) is a speed that may not be deliberately exceeded in any regime of flight (climb, cruise, or descent), unless a higher speed is authorized for flight test or pilot training operations. *V* *MO*/*M* *MO* must be established so that it is not greater than the design cruising speed *V* *C* and so that it is sufficiently below *V* *D*/*M* *D* or *V* *DF*/*M* *DF,* to make it highly improbable that the latter speeds will be inadvertently exceeded in operations. The speed margin between *V* *MO*/*M* *MO* and *V* *D*/*M* *D* or *V* *DF* *M/* *DF* may not be less than that determined under § 25.335(b) or found necessary during the flight tests conducted under § 25.253. [Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5680, Apr. 8, 1970]
#### § 25.537 Seawing loads.

Seawing design loads must be based on applicable test data.
§ 158.71 Federal oversight. ( a ) The Administrator may periodically audit and/or review the use of PFC revenue by a public agency. The purpose of the audit or review is to ensure that the public agency is in compliance with the requirements of this part and 49 U.S.C. 40117.
( b ) The Administrator may periodically audit and/or review the collection and remittance by the collecting carriers of PFC revenue. The purpose of the audit or review is to ensure collecting carriers are in compliance with the requirements of this part and 49 U.S.C. 40117.
( c ) Public agencies and carriers shall allow any authorized representative of the Administrator, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Comptroller General of the U.S., access to any of its books, documents, papers, and records pertinent to PFC's
[Doc. No. 26385, 56 FR 24278, May 29, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 158-2, 65 FR 34543, May 30, 2000]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,863                      34
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      339                       7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,278                     195
<PP&E>                                             818                      92
<DEPRECIATION>                                     118                      13
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,606                     273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,377                     700
<BONDS>                                             68                     147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            25                      11
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,137                   2,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,606                     273
<SALES>                                            592                      29
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   592                      29
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,619                   3,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,140                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,168)                 (3,076)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,168)                 (3,076)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.50)                  (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>