alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 703.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part interprets several of the provisions of Sections 107(7), 107(8), and 107(15) of the Federal Credit Union Act (Act), 12 U.S.C. 1757(7), 1757(8), 1757(15), which list those securities, deposits, and other obligations in which a Federal credit union may invest. Part 703 identifies certain investments and deposit activities permissible under the Act and prescribes regulations governing those investments and deposit activities on the basis of safety and soundness concerns. Additionally, part 703 identifies and prohibits certain investments and deposit activities. Investments and deposit activities that are permissible under the Act and not prohibited or otherwise regulated by part 703 remain permissible for Federal credit unions.
( b ) This part does not apply to: ( 1 ) Investment in loans to members and related activities, which is governed by §§ 701.21, 701.22, 701.23, and part 723 of this chapter;
( 2 ) The purchase of real estate-secured loans pursuant to Section 107(15)(A) of the Act, which is governed by § 701.23 of this chapter, except those real estate-secured loans purchased as a part of an investment repurchase transaction, which is governed by §§ 703.13 and 703.14 of this chapter;
( 3 ) Investment in credit union service organizations, which is governed by part 712 of this chapter;
( 4 ) Investment in fixed assets, which is governed by § 701.36 of this chapter;
( 5 ) Investment by corporate credit unions, which is governed by part 704 of this chapter.
( 6 ) Investment activity by State-chartered credit unions, except as provided in §§ 741.3(a)(2) and 741.219 of this chapter; or
( 7 ) Funding a Charitable Donation Account pursuant to § 721.3(b) of this chapter.
[68 FR 32960, June 3, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 27828, May 17, 2004; 71 FR 76124, Dec. 20, 2006; 78 FR 76730, Dec. 19, 2013]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 59763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23608]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Agency Request for Comments on Draft Solicitation for Advanced 
Nuclear Energy Projects

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Loan Programs Office (LPO) of the Department of Energy 
(DOE) announces availability of a draft of a potential future 
solicitation for Federal Loan Guarantees for Advanced Nuclear Energy 
Projects. LPO invites comments regarding the draft of the potential 
future solicitation.

DATES: Comments regarding the draft of the potential future 
solicitation must be received on or before November 3, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be sent to Peter W. Davidson, Executive 
Director, Loan Programs Office, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585. The draft solicitation 
is available on LPO's Web site at http://www.lgprogram.energy.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter W. Davidson, 
LPO.NuclearSolicitation.Comments@hq.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE is considering a potential future 
solicitation for Federal Loan Guarantees for Advanced Nuclear Energy 
Projects. Should DOE choose to proceed with such a solicitation, 
applicants would be invited to apply for loan guarantees from DOE to 
finance projects and facilities located in the United States that 
employ innovative advanced nuclear energy (``Advanced Nuclear Energy 
Projects''). DOE may make up to Twelve Billion Six Hundred Million 
Dollars ($12,600,000,000) in loan guarantee authority available under 
the proposed solicitation for Advanced Nuclear Energy Projects. Of that 
amount, $2,000,000,000 is available exclusively for advanced nuclear 
facilities for the ``front-end'' of the nuclear fuel cycle. The 
remaining $10,600,000,000 is available for nuclear power facilities.
    LPO is announcing a draft of a potential future solicitation for 
Federal Loan Guarantees for Advanced Nuclear Energy Projects. LPO 
invites comments regarding the draft of the potential future 
solicitation.

    Statutory Authority: Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 
(42 U.S.C. 16511 et seq.).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 29, 2014.
April G. Stephenson,
Chief Operating Officer, Loan Programs Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-23608 Filed 10-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Element 21 Golf Company (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David Khazak,
Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:





(1)
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Date:
      May 14, 2009
            
            By:  /s/
      David KhazakChief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATON EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30, 1997
FORM 10QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,596,943
<SECURITIES>                                 1,084,061
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,026,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                   422,169
<INVENTORY>                                    235,212
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,261,021
<PP&E>                                       1,152,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,937,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,342,751
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       723,556
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,000,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,937,407
<SALES>                                      6,081,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,075,655
<CGS>                                          201,359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,706,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                368,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                   128,273
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            240,426
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   240,426
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
Chapter 3: Affected Environment

US Fish & Wildlife Service

Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge
Jefferson County, CO

oe gen BEY,
a = = : ‘Jefferson County

Big
on
Infrastructure, Easements, and Utilities t = sme
[MM Gas Line Easement (©. ve Retained Area (Subject to Change} December 2003 x
ME Electrical Line Easement === Colorado State Highway
= Fiber Optic Line Easement —— Paved Road
soo+ Existing Fence ~ Two-Track Road
Mine Permit Area
Permitted Mining Use
Habitat Preservation
Figure no. 19
118

Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge
Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:275-1   Filed:06/08/17   Entered:06/08/17 12:02:31    Desc:Exhibit Payment Receipt   Page 1 of 1
§ 135.365 Large transport category airplanes: Reciprocating engine powered: Weight limitations. ( a ) No person may take off a reciprocating engine powered large transport category airplane from an airport located at an elevation outside of the range for which maximum takeoff weights have been determined for that airplane.
( b ) No person may take off a reciprocating engine powered large transport category airplane for an airport of intended destination that is located at an elevation outside of the range for which maximum landing weights have been determined for that airplane.
( c ) No person may specify, or have specified, an alternate airport that is located at an elevation outside of the range for which maximum landing weights have been determined for the reciprocating engine powered large transport category airplane concerned.
( d ) No person may take off a reciprocating engine powered large transport category airplane at a weight more than the maximum authorized takeoff weight for the elevation of the airport.
( e ) No person may take off a reciprocating engine powered large transport category airplane if its weight on arrival at the airport of destination will be more than the maximum authorized landing weight for the elevation of that airport, allowing for normal consumption of fuel and oil en route.
#### § 13.127 Reports, decisions, and orders.

The presiding officer must issue a written report based on the record developed during the formal investigation, including a summary of principal conclusions. A summary of principal conclusions must be prepared by the official who issued the order of investigation in every case that results in no action, or no action as to a particular party to the investigation. All such reports must be furnished to the parties to the investigation and made available to the public on request.
#### INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. No. 48 v. UNION GRADED SCHOOL DIST. No. 7 et al.

No. 31903.

Jan. 30, 1945.

*156 P. 2d 609.*

C. C. Hatchett, of Durant, for plaintiff in error.

D. S. McDonald, Jr., of Durant, for defendants in error.

ARNOLD, J.

Throughout this opinion we will refer to plaintiff in error as “plaintiff,” and defendants in error as “defendants,” the position they occupied in the trial court. The controversy involves two parcels of land which were a part of plaintiff’s territory prior to two purported orders of annexation, the first having been entered on August 7, 1943, as to parcel 1, and the second having been entered on April 10, 1944, as to parcel 2, described in plaintiff’s petition. The case was submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts. From the agreed statement of facts it is shown that the defendants, purporting to act under Senate Bill No. 5 of the 1943 Legislature, instituted proceedings to detach two parcels of territory from the plaintiff’s district, and the county superintendent, after holding an election in the disputed-territory, made the orders of annexation. The areas involved were never a part of the district to which attached by the orders of the county superintendent herein complained of. The plaintiff alleges, and the agreed statement of facts recites, that the defendant district, as well as the county authorities of Bryan county, recognized the purported orders of annexation in the enrollment of pupils and in the distribution of state apportionments of school aid, and the distribution of taxes collected from the disputed territory, and *105ousted plaintiff from any control thereof.

It is conceded by all parties that if under the 1943 act of the Legislature, 70 O.S. Supp. §§ 891.1-891.11, there was any power or authority on the part of the county superintendent to make the orders of annexation, the plaintiff must fail, and if such authority is lacking under said act, the plaintiff must prevail.

Under the foregoing statement of facts it is apparent that our decision in Board of Education of Burbank Independent School District No. 20, a Municipal Corporation of Osage County, v. T. E. Allen, County Superintendent of Public Instruction of Osage County, et al., 195 Okla. 209, 156 P. 2d 596, is controlling and decisive of this appeal. The purported annexations were without authority and void.

Reversed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 139

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

#### § 139.3 Delegation of authority.

The authority of the Administrator to issue, deny, and revoke Airport Operating Certificates is delegated to the Associate Administrator for Airports, Director of Airport Safety and Standards, and Regional Airports Division Managers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's 1st quarter 1997 Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         673,671
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,279,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,290
<INVENTORY>                                    413,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,877,258
<PP&E>                                      23,675,267
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,645,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,145,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,431,249
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,585
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,328,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,145,951
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,801,517
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,455,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             348,334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                160,433
<INCOME-TAX>                                    58,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            101,533
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,225<F2>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
<FN>
<F1>Other expenses are netted with other income in the period. The result was
income of $133,919.  The edgarlink program does no allow a income number to be
entered in this field.  The other expense portion of this number is immaterial.
<F2>The difference between Income Continuing and Net Income relates to Minority
Interests in Preferred Stock Dividends of consolidated subsidiaries
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--The Frame Relay Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 8, 1999, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), The Frame Relay Forum (FRF) 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, ASC, Vienna, VA; TeraGen, San Jose, CA; Science Dynamics, 
Cherry Hill, NJ; Advantel S.A., Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, MEXICO; and 
T-DATA, Bonn, GERMANY have joined FRF as worldwide members. Ascend 
Communication, Westford, MA has changed its name to Lucent 
Technologies, Westford, MA; and Hewlett Packard, Colorado Springs, CO 
has changed its name to Agilent Technologies, Colorado Springs, CO.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and The Frame Relay Forum (FRF) intends 
to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On April 10, 1992, The Frame Relay Forum (FRF) filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on July 2, 1992 (57 FR 29537).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 22, 
1999. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 2, 1999 (64 FR 67589).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-10600 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2808 Filed:03/26/18 Entered:03/26/18 15:00:14 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2808 Filed:03/26/18 Entered:03/26/18 15:00:14 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2808 Filed:03/26/18 Entered:03/26/18 15:00:14 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2808 Filed:03/26/18 Entered:03/26/18 15:00:14 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2808 Filed:03/26/18 Entered:03/26/18 15:00:14 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 5
§ 125.409 Service difficulty reports. ( a ) Each certificate holder shall report the occurrence or detection of each failure, malfunction, or defect, in a form and manner prescribed by the Administrator.
( b ) Each certificate holder shall submit each report required by this section, covering each 24-hour period beginning at 0900 local time of each day and ending at 0900 local time on the next day, to the FAA office in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Each report of occurrences during a 24-hour period shall be submitted to the collection point within the next 96 hours. However, a report due on Saturday or Sunday may be submitted on the following Monday, and a report due on a holiday may be submitted on the next work day.
[Doc. No. 19779, 45 FR 67235, Oct. 9, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 125-49, 70 FR 76979, Dec. 29, 2005]
<PAGE>


                                   Exhibit 15


                          Accountants' Acknowledgment

First Brands Corporation
83 Wooster Heights Road
Danbury, CT 06813-1911

Gentlemen:

RE: FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENTS NO. 33-35770, NO. 33-56992, NO. 33-56503,
    NO. 333-56503 AND NO. 333-45379

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our reports dated October 30, 1997, January 29,
1998 and May 5, 1998 related to our reviews of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 (C) under the Securities Act of 1933, such reports are
not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                                    Very truly yours,

                                                    /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP




New York, New York
May 5, 1998


<PAGE>
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.20 Compliance with applicable requirements. The applicant for a type certificate, including an amended or supplemental type certificate, must— ( a ) Show compliance with all applicable requirements and must provide the FAA the means by which such compliance has been shown; and
( b ) Provide a statement certifying that the applicant has complied with the applicable requirements.
[Doc. No. FAA-2006-25877, Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53385, Oct. 16, 2009]