alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Solid state SPS microwave generation and transmission study
 
p 1| p2|
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:3344-5
Item Number:0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000971371
November 9, 2018
1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-3329

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

Percy LeNeal Harrell, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 7, 2007

Filed: June 11, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Percy Harrell pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute 500 grams

or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(A). At sentencing, over Harrell’s objection, the district court1

applied a two-level enhancement for possession of a dangerous weapon under

U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), and sentenced Harrell to 168 months in prison and 5 years of

supervised release. He appeals, contesting the two-level enhancement. Reviewing the
-2-

district court’s finding for clear error, see United States v. Braggs, 317 F.3d 901, 904

(8th Cir. 2003), we affirm.

The district court concluded that, because two handguns and $7,700 in admitted

drug proceeds were found in Harrell’s house, it was not clearly improbable that there

was a nexus between the guns and drug activities; the court also noted the presence

of a small amount of crack cocaine in the house plus drug-packaging paraphernalia

in the detached garage. The court did not clearly err in imposing the enhancement.

See Brown v. United States, 169 F.3d 531, 533 (8th Cir. 1999) (“close proximity of

firearms and ‘drug money’ can give rise to an inference that the firearms are present

to protect the money and drugs, which is a nexus sufficient to support an enhancement

under 2D1.1(b)(1)”); U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), comment. (n.3) (clearly improbable

standard).

Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________
Opinion issued January 28, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00966-CV

———————————

IN RE DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND DIAMOND 

OFFSHORE DRILLING LTD., Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This proceeding arises from a personal injury sustained by Bruce Masson, 

the real party in interest, alleged to have occurred during his employment on a 

drilling rig temporarily docked at a Malaysian port. Diamond Offshore Drilling, 

Inc. and Diamond Offshore Drilling, Ltd., the relators, seek mandamus relief from
2

the trial court’s interlocutory order denying their motion to dismiss for forum non 

conveniens.1

 

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. All pending motions are denied 

as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.

 1 The Honorable Elizabeth Ray, Judge of the 165th District Court of Harris 

County is the respondent. The underlying case is Bruce Masson v. Diamond 

Offshore Drilling, Inc. and Diamond Offshore Drilling, Ltd., No. 2012-

21768, in the 165th District Court, Harris County, Texas.
Order filed December 13, 2011, Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated and Order filed

December 22, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00381-CR

____________

JAMICHAEL DEMON HENRY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1269585

O R D E R

On December 13, 2011, this Court issued an order abating the appeal and directing 

the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for counsel's failure to file a 

brief. 

Today, appellant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal because appellant's brief has 

been filed. The motion is GRANTED. Our order of December 13, 2011, is 

WITHDRAWN. The appeal is REINSTATED. 

PER CURIAM
#### § 1262.203 Documentation of fees and expenses.

The application shall be accompanied by full documentation of the fees and expenses, including the cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project, or similar matter for which an award is sought. A separate itemized statement, accompanied by an oath of affirmation under penalty of perjury (28 U.S.C. 1746), shall be submitted for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the application, showing the hours spent in connection with the proceeding by each individual, a description of the specific services performed, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for which reimbursement is sought, the total amount paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services provided. The adjudicative officer may, in addition, require the applicant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any expenses claimed.
§ 1253.205 Educational institutions and other entities controlled by religious organizations. ( a ) *Exemption.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to any operation of an educational institution or other entity that is controlled by a religious organization to the extent that application of these Title IX regulations would not be consistent with the religious tenets of such organization.
( b ) *Exemption claims.* An educational institution or other entity that wishes to claim the exemption set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall do so by submitting in writing to the designated agency official a statement by the highest-ranking official of the institution, identifying the provisions of these Title IX regulations that conflict with a specific tenet of the religious organization.
EXHIBIT D-1 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:20006-8 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 19:49:57 Desc:

Exhibit D-1 Page 1 of 4
Certified to be a correct and true translation from the source text in Spanish to the target language English.

15/DECEMBER/2021 - Andreea I. Boscor ATA-certified Spanish-English #525556

By Targem Translations Inc.

To: CLERK OFFICE OF UNITED STATES,

District Court room 150 Federal Building, San Juan, P.R. 00918-1767

Case Number: 17-BK-03283

Debtor: COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO

OMNIBUS OBJECTION: 380 CLAIM: 171765

YEARS WORKED FROM 1989-1996.

SUBJECT: To my understanding the years I worked with Corporación Azucarera Central 

Mercedita de Ponce, P.R. in the Security Department and afterwards in the Maintenance

Department, it belonged to the COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO and the Government 

was the one responsible for resolving any salary increase situation or claim based on the 

stipulated agreement.

If there was a salary increase or any other benefit for the time that I worked, I have not seen 

an increase increased. I am part of this claim if there is an opportunity for the Government to 

come to an agreement.

1. Romerazo, a law signed in 1979: By the then-governor Carlos Romero Barcelo who 

changed the salary scales for civil servants.

2. Act 96, under Sila María Calderón, which entailed an increase in the wage check.

3. To verify the checks under the name of who paid them: The Government, not private 

companies.

Yours faithfully, Julio M. López Álvarez.

 [Signature]

Telephone: 978-242-2070

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:20006-8 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 19:49:57 Desc:

Exhibit D-1 Page 2 of 4
Certified to be a correct and true translation from the source text in Spanish to the target language English.

15/DECEMBER/2021 - Andreea I. Boscor ATA-certified Spanish-English #525556

By Targem Translations Inc.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:20006-8 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 19:49:57 Desc:

Exhibit D-1 Page 3 of 4
TRANSLATOR’S CERTIFICATE OF TRANSLATION

Translation from: Spanish (Puerto Rico) into English (US)

TARGEM Translations Inc.

I, Andreea I. Boscor, ATA-certified Spanish-English #525556, acting as translator at TARGEM Translations Inc., a 

NEW YORK City corporation, with its principal office at 185 Clymer Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11211, USA, certify that:

the English translated document is a true and accurate translation of the original Spanish and has been 

translated to the best of my knowledge.

Original Document Name: Claim No. 171765

 

Signed this 15th day of December, 2021 

__________________________ 

 Andreea I. Boscor

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:20006-8 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 19:49:57 Desc:

Exhibit D-1 Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement No. 333-160046 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-166208, 333-134430, 333-91526, 333-161235 and 333-116180 on Form S-8 of our reports dated April 15, 2012, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Quicksilver Resources Inc. and subsidiaries (which report includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-3, “Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures”), andthe effectiveness of Quicksilver Resources Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of Quicksilver Resources Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal controlbecause of a material weakness), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quicksilver Resources Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2011. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Fort Worth, Texas 

April 15, 2012
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-76415) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Plan and the 1999
Employees Stock Purchase Plan of GoTo.com, and (Form S-8 dated February 10,
2000) pertaining to the Cadabra Inc. 1998 Stock Plan of Cadabra Inc., assumed
by GoTo.com of our report dated February 8, 2000, with respect to the financial
statements of GoTo.com included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1999.



                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 14, 2000
1 WILLIAM V. O'CONNOR, JR. (CA SBN 216650) 

WOConnor@mofo.com 

2 JOANNA L. SIMON 

J oam1aSimon@mofo.com 

3 . MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

· 12531 High Bluff Drive 

4 San Diego, California 92130-2040 

Telephone: 858.720.5100 

5 Facsimile: 858.720.5125 

6 Attorneys for Alaska Airlines Inc. 

J.JG i b f: 50 

7 

8 

9 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

10 

11 In the Matter of: FAA Case No. 2011NM020013 

12 Alaska Airlines Inc. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF 

JOANNA L. SIMON 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

TO THE COURT, THE PLAINTIFF AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

PLEASE T.&_KE NOTICE THAT Joanna L. Simon, ofthe law firm Morrison & Foerster 

LLP, hereby enters her appearance as counsel for Alaska Airlines Inc. 

1. Joanna L. Simon is licensed to practice law in the State of California and is a 

member in good standing of the California State Bar Association. 

Dated: August 9, 2013 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By:~~ \!:)~ L. Simon 

Attomeys for Defendant 

ALASKA AIRLINES INC. 

Notic. of Appearance of Joanna L. Simon 1 

(No. IINM020013) 

sd-623148 
1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

2 The undersigned certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws ofthe State of 

3 California that on this date I caused to be served in the matter indicated a copy of the within and 

4 foregoing document upon the following persons: 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Certi 

(No. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC- 430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Robert Spitzer 

Robert. Spitzer@faa. gov 

FAA Office of Regional Counsel 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW 

Renton, W A 98057 

Dated: August 9, 2013 

~ate of Service 

)! INM020013) 

Via Nationwide Legal, Inc. 

Via E-Mail
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

Critical Path, Inc. Subsidiaries

Domestic:

           dotOne Acquisition Corp.
           FaxNet
           Netmosphere, Inc.
           RemarQ Communities, Inc.
           Peer Logic India


International:

           3034996 Nova Scotia Company, A Nova Scotia Company
           3034997 Nova Scotia Company, A Nova Scotia Company
           Amplitude Software UK Ltd.
           Compass Acquisition Corp.
           Compass Holding Corp.
           CP AG (Switzerland)
           CP A/S (Denmark)
           CP B.V.
           CP Data Centre UK
           CP Germany
           CP Ireland
           CP Latin America
           CP SA (aka FaxNet SA)
           CP SA (France)
           CP SpA (Italy)
           Critical Path Data Center
           Critical Path GmbH
           Critical Path Messaging Co.
           Critical Path SA (aka FaxNet SA)
           Critical Path Technologies (formerly PL UK)
           Critical Path UK Ltd.
           FaxNet Argentina
           FaxNet Services Corp.
           Fisher Technology Group Inc.
           Licoln Software Ltd.
           Lookforth Ltd.
           Nihon PeerLogic KK
           Peer Logic Canada, Inc.
           RemarQ UK Ltd.
           UI Telecom, Inc.
           Unicom Int'l. LLC
<PAGE>


                                 EXHIBIT (10)(a)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

<PAGE>

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports (1)
dated February 14, 2003 with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements
and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company and (2) dated January 31,
2003 with respect to certain subaccounts of Retirement Builder Variable Annuity
Account, which are available for investment by contract owners of The One Income
Annuity, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Registration
Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-78743) and related Prospectus of The One Income
Annuity.

                                                            /s/Ernst & Young LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
April 25, 2003
|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ O’Neil Nalavadi                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
| O’Neil Nalavadi                                   |
| Senior Vice President                                   |
| Chief Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer |
|                                                    |
| February 28, 2011                                       |

----
EXHIBIT 99.1 -- Certification of Chief Operating Officer







               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the filing of Australian-Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Ely Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

   (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)   The  information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condi tion and results of
         operations of the Company.


Dated:   April 14, 2003



/s/ Ely Sakhai
Ely Sakhai, President and
Chief  Executive Officer
























                            Exhibit 99.1
§ 1300.10 General standards for Board issuance of Federal credit instruments. ( a ) In accordance with section 102(c)(1) of the Act, the Board may enter into agreements with one or more borrowers to issue Federal credit instruments only if the Board determines, in its discretion and in accordance with the minimum requirements set forth in this part, that— ( 1 ) The borrower is an air carrier for which credit is not reasonably available at the time of the transaction;
( 2 ) The intended obligation by the borrower is prudently incurred; and
( 3 ) Such agreement is a necessary part of maintaining a safe, efficient, and viable commercial aviation system in the United States.
( b ) In accordance with section 102(c)(2)(A) of the Act, the Board shall enter into an agreement to issue a Federal credit instrument in such form and on such terms and conditions and subject to such covenants, representations, warranties, and requirements (including requirements for audits) as the Board determines are appropriate for satisfying the requirements of this part and any supplemental requirements issued by the Board under section 102(c)(2)(B) of the Act.
( c ) In accordance with section 102(d)(1) of the Act, in entering into agreements to issue Federal credit instruments, the Board shall, to the extent feasible and practicable and in accordance with the requirements in this part, ensure that the Federal Government is compensated for the risk assumed in making guarantees.
( d ) In accordance with Section 102(d)(2) of the Act, the Board is authorized to enter into contracts under which the Federal Government, contingent on the financial success of the air carrier, would participate in the gains of the air carrier or its security holders through the use of such instruments as warrants, stock options, common or preferred stock, or other appropriate equity instruments, except that the Board shall not accept an equity interest in an air carrier that gives the Federal Government voting rights.
( e ) In accordance with Section 104(a) of the Act, the Board may only issue a Federal credit instrument to an air carrier after the air carrier enters into a legally binding agreement with the Board regarding certain employee compensation.
§ 1253.515 Compensation. A recipient shall not make or enforce any policy or practice that, on the basis of sex: ( a ) Makes distinctions in rates of pay or other compensation;
( b ) Results in the payment of wages to employees of one sex at a rate less than that paid to employees of the opposite sex for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/13

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - A.Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution - 13.Declaration on Article III-116***Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0460 - 0460*

13. Declaration on Article III-116

The Conference agrees that, in its general efforts to eliminate inequalities between women and men, the Union will aim in its different policies to combat all kinds of domestic violence. The Member States should take all necessary measures to prevent and punish these criminal acts and to support and protect the victims.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 99.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Community Trust Financial Services Corporation

We
have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows of Community Trust Financial Services Corporation and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.

We
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Community Trust Financial Services
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/
Porter Keadle Moore, LLP

Atlanta,
Georgia
February 2, 2001

---

QuickLinks
§ 1216.310 Classified actions. ( a ) The classified status of a proposed action does not relieve NASA of the requirement to assess, document, and consider the environmental impacts of a proposed action.
( b ) When classified information can reasonably be separated from other information and a meaningful environmental analysis can be produced, unclassified documents will be prepared and processed in accordance with these regulations. Classified portions will be kept separate and provided to properly cleared reviewers and decision makers in the form of a properly classified document that meets the requirements of these regulations to the extent permitted, given such classification.
[77 FR 3103, Jan. 23, 2012, as amended 89 FR 25502, Apr. 11, 2024]