alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 147.27 FAA inspection.

A certificated aviation maintenance technician school must allow the Administrator such access as the Administrator determines necessary to inspect the one or more locations of the school for purposes of determining the school's compliance with the requirements of this part.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:

         -        the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                  13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended, and

         -        the information contained in the report fairly presents, on
                  all material respects, the Corporation's financial condition
                  and results of operations.

/s/ John J. Remaley
John J. Remaley, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 12, 2003
```

[114th Congress Public Law 112]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 129 STAT. 2241]]

Public Law 114-112
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
     To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on 
supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in critical 
    access and small rural hospitals through 2015. <<NOTE: Dec. 18, 
                          2015 -  [S. 1461]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENFORCEMENT INSTRUCTION ON SUPERVISION 
                              REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTPATIENT 
                              THERAPEUTIC SERVICES IN CRITICAL 
                              ACCESS AND SMALL RURAL HOSPITALS 
                              THROUGH 2015.

    Section 1 of Public Law 113-198 <<NOTE: 128 Stat. 2057.>> is 
amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by inserting ``and 2015'' after 
        ``2014''; and
            (2) by striking ``calendar year 2014'' and inserting 
        ``calendar years 2014 and 2015''.

    Approved December 18, 2015.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1461:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 114-109 (Comm. on Finance).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015):
            Sept. 10, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 8, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 2

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2844-3 Filed:04/04/18 Entered:04/04/18 20:53:05 Desc:

Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 3
TABLE II 

Active Cases filed by PRHTA Managerial Employees before 

The Puerto Rico Public Service Appeal Commission (CASP)

that have been stayed pursuant to PROMESA Title III proceedings,

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico

Case No.

Caption

File Date

Nature of Claim Answer and 

Defenses by 

PRHTA and 

other filings by 

the parties

Discovery

(Both Parties)

(Date)

Status Hearings 

and/or 

Conferences

Proposed Pre-Trial 

Order and Pre-Trial 

Conference

Full Hearing Resolution Other relevant 

Information

Case No.: 2015-04-3596

María del Carmen Rolón Castillo y 

Magdalena Baranda Pérez

Appeal filed

April 29, 2015

Reclassification of Position 

Denial Challenge

Informative

Motion on 

Notification of 

NonCompliance 

with 

Requirements 

on Request for 

Appeal

June 30, 2015

None None None None None None

Case No. 2016-04-1111

Nurys Molina Pérez

Appeal filed

April 26, 2016

Reclassification of Position 

(Challenge of Denial or 

non-consideration of 

petition to reclassify the 

same)

December 20, 

2016-Appellant 

filed Motion 

Requesting 

Reconsideration 

of the appeal 

rejection by the 

Commission 

Clerk. (pending) 

None None None None None A claim of the 

same nature 

was filed on 

behalf of 

Appellant 

before the 

PRHTA

Board of 

Appeals. 

Initially that 

appeal was 

dismissed but 

that ruling 

was later 

reversed by 

the PR Court 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2844-3 Filed:04/04/18 Entered:04/04/18 20:53:05 Desc:

Exhibit 2 Page 2 of 3
TABLE II 

Active Cases filed by PRHTA Managerial Employees before 

The Puerto Rico Public Service Appeal Commission (CASP)

that have been stayed pursuant to PROMESA Title III proceedings,

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico

of Appeals. 

(See Table I, 

case No. 

2016-ACT003). 

Case No. 2016-10-0511

Asunción Quiñonez Colón

Appeal filed

October 12, 2016

Claim of unpaid difference 

of the Christmas Bonus for 

the year 2014

None None None None None None None

Case No. 2016-22-0658

Aleyda Berríos Rivera

Appeal filed

November 30, 2016

Request for the 

Reclassification of Position 

None None None None None None None

Case No. 2016-04-1117

José García Morales and others

Appeal filed

April 7, 2016

Claim of unpaid difference 

of the Christmas Bonus for 

the year 2014

June 15, 2016-

PRHTA filed its 

Answer to 

Complaint

None None None None None None

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2844-3 Filed:04/04/18 Entered:04/04/18 20:53:05 Desc:

Exhibit 2 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3846 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3846

  To observe the lives lost in the United States due to the COVID-19 
                               pandemic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 1, 2020

 Mr. Schumer (for Mr. Schatz (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Coons, 
 Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Bennet, Ms. Smith, Ms. 
 Duckworth, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Blumenthal, Mrs. Shaheen, Mrs. Murray, Ms. 
  Warren, Mr. Tester, Mr. Markey, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Brown, and Mr. 
     Booker)) introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To observe the lives lost in the United States due to the COVID-19 
                               pandemic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``COVID-19 Pandemic Moment of Silence 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR THE VICTIMS OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.

    The President shall issue a proclamation calling on the people of 
the United States to observe a moment of silence at 12:00pm (local 
time) on Monday, June 1, 2020, as a mark of respect to the memory of 
the more than 100,000 lives lost in the United States due to the COVID-
19 pandemic, and their families.
                                 <all>
```
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE0 1 416

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
#### § 249.31 Preservation and inspection of evidence of compliance.

Air carriers and foreign air carriers shall preserve evidence of compliance with the requirements imposed under Regulation Z of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (12 CFR part 226), implementing the provisions of Title I (Truth in Lending) and Title V (General Provisions) of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1601 *et seq.*) other than the advertising requirements under § 226.10 of regulation Z. This evidence shall be preserved for no less than 2 years after the date each disclosure is required to be made and shall be made available for inspection by authorized representatives of the DOT.

[ER-1214, 46 FR 25415, May 6, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 66726, Dec. 26, 1995]
§ 23.2400 Powerplant installation. ( a ) For the purpose of this subpart, the airplane powerplant installation must include each component necessary for propulsion, which affects propulsion safety, or provides auxiliary power to the airplane.
( b ) Each airplane engine and propeller must be type certificated, except for engines and propellers installed on level 1 low-speed airplanes, which may be approved under the airplane type certificate in accordance with a standard accepted by the Administrator that contains airworthiness criteria the Administrator has found appropriate and applicable to the specific design and intended use of the engine or propeller and provides a level of safety acceptable to the Administrator.
( c ) The applicant must construct and arrange each powerplant installation to account for— ( 1 ) Likely operating conditions, including foreign object threats;
( 2 ) Sufficient clearance of moving parts to other airplane parts and their surroundings;
( 3 ) Likely hazards in operation including hazards to ground personnel; and
( 4 ) Vibration and fatigue.
( d ) Hazardous accumulations of fluids, vapors, or gases must be isolated from the airplane and personnel compartments, and be safely contained or discharged.
( e ) Powerplant components must comply with their component limitations and installation instructions or be shown not to create a hazard.
[Doc. No. FAA-2015-1621, Amdt. 23-64, 81 FR 96689, Dec. 30, 2016, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. 23-65, 87 FR 75710, Dec. 9, 2022]
#### § 121.387 Flight engineer.

No certificate holder may operate an airplane for which a type certificate was issued before January 2, 1964, having a maximum certificated takeoff weight of more than 80,000 pounds without a flight crewmember holding a current flight engineer certificate. For each airplane type certificated after January 1, 1964, the requirement for a flight engineer is determined under the type certification requirements of § 25.1523.

[Doc. No. 5025, 30 FR 6067, Apr. 29, 1965]
§ 171.9 Installation requirements. ( a ) The facility must be installed according to accepted good engineering practices, applicable electric and safety codes, and the installation must meet at least the Federal Communication Commission's licensing requirements.
( b ) The facility must have a reliable source of suitable primary power, either from a power distribution system or locally generated, with a supplemental standby system, if needed.
( c ) Dual transmitting equipment with automatic changeover is preferred and may be required to support certain IFR procedures.
( d ) There must be a means for determining, from the ground, the performance of the equipment, including the antenna, initially and periodically.
( e ) A facility intended for use as an instrument approach aid for an airport must have or be supplemented by (depending on circumstances) the following ground-air or landline communications services: ( 1 ) At facilities outside of and not immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, there must be ground-air communications from the airport served by the facility. Separate communications channels are acceptable.
( 2 ) At facilities within or immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, there must be the ground-air communications required by paragraph (e)(1) of this section and reliable communications (at least a landline telephone) from the airport to the nearest FAA air traffic control or communication facility.
Paragraphs (e) (1) and (2) of this section are not mandatory at airports where an adjacent FAA facility can communicate with aircraft on the ground at the airport and during the entire proposed instrument approach procedure. In addition, at low traffic density airports within or immediately adjacent to controlled airspace and where extensive delays are not a factor, the requirements of paragraphs (e) (1) and (2) of this section may be reduced to reliable communications (at least a landline telephone) from the airport to the nearest FAA air traffic control or communication facility, if an adjacent FAA facility can communicate with aircraft during the proposed instrument approach procedure, at least down to the minimum en route altitude for the controlled airspace area. [Doc. No. 5034, 29 FR 11337, Aug. 6, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 171-7, 35 FR 12711, Aug. 11, 1970; Amdt. 171-16, 56 FR 65664, Dec. 17, 1991]
#### § 27.755 Hulls.

For each rotorcraft, with a hull and auxiliary floats, that is to be approved for both taking off from and landing on water, the hull and auxiliary floats must have enough watertight compartments so that, with any single compartment flooded, the buoyancy of the hull and auxiliary floats (and wheel tires if used) provides a margin of positive stability great enough to minimize the probability of capsizing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          12,292
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,040
<PP&E>                                         406,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                 323,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 188,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          681,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,000
<COMMON>                                        49,512
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,248,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   188,137
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               264,955
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  895,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             141,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (771,902)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
p.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

93) IV-C-59 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:56 AM Sheet 93 of 232 
P.2 

J*" 0"** * 

-87-ii 

LX-C-S9 

I -5JL t UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

^ \gj^L ° WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

^ ~ " ^ '**«*** FEB 4 1988 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Joseph M. McDade 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Mr. McDade 

Thank you for passing along your comments concerning 

EPA's proposal to require onboard refueling emission controls. 

Be assured that these comments will be considered as we prepare 

our final rule. We will also be placing them in the public 

docket for the rulemaking (Docket No. A-87-11). 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

C,?!GiNAL SIGNED BY 

RICHARD D. WILSON 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Docket A-87-11 

Prepared by: Form Letter:SAL:2/l/88:AL880367 - ECTD, Ann Arbor, MI 

bcc: Region 03 

Congressional Liaison/Quinn
§ 121.465 Aircraft dispatcher duty time limitations: Domestic and flag operations. ( a ) Each certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations shall establish the daily duty period for a dispatcher so that it begins at a time that allows him or her to become thoroughly familiar with existing and anticipated weather conditions along the route before he or she dispatches any airplane. He or she shall remain on duty until each airplane dispatched by him or her has completed its flight, or has gone beyond his or her jurisdiction, or until he or she is relieved by another qualified dispatcher.
( b ) Except in cases where circumstances or emergency conditions beyond the control of the certificate holder require otherwise— ( 1 ) No certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations may schedule a dispatcher for more than 10 consecutive hours of duty;
( 2 ) If a dispatcher is scheduled for more than 10 hours of duty in 24 consecutive hours, the certificate holder shall provide him or her a rest period of at least eight hours at or before the end of 10 hours of duty.
( 3 ) Each dispatcher must be relieved of all duty with the certificate holder for at least 24 consecutive hours during any seven consecutive days or the equivalent thereof within any calendar month.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, a certificate holder conducting flag operations may, if authorized by the Administrator, schedule an aircraft dispatcher at a duty station outside of the 48 contiguous States and the District of Columbia, for more than 10 consecutive hours of duty in a 24-hour period if that aircraft dispatcher is relieved of all duty with the certificate holder for at least eight hours during each 24-hour period.
[Doc. No. 28154, 61 FR 2612, Jan. 26, 1996]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
# Official Journal C 384I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 384I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6212 November 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 384I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6212 November 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2019/C 384 I/01 | Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community | 1 |
| 2019/C 384 I/02 | Political declaration setting out the framework for the future relationship between the European Union and the United Kingdom | 178 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2019/C 384 I/01

Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community

1

2019/C 384 I/02

Political declaration setting out the framework for the future relationship between the European Union and the United Kingdom

178

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
In The Matter Of: Marco Fimbres Respondent 

### SERVED: May 5, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2015-0204 Case No. 2014WP070124

DISMISSAL ORDER OnMay4, 2016, the Respondent filed a Notice ofWithdrawal ofRequestfor Hearing, stating that the parties had reached a settlement inthis matter. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, a party may withdraw a request for a hearing withoutthe consent ofthe administrative lawjudge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such withdrawal, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the case withprejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that these proceedings are dismissed with prejudice.



# ~------------ DOUG:ASMRA WALD Administrative LawJudge

Attachment: Service ListSERVICE LIST - BY 

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001



### Marco 

### A. Fimbres, Respondent 

### 4444 East Benson Highway, Trlr 21 Tucson, AZ 85706 Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7.6 Western-Pacific Region Federi:tl Aviation Administration P. 

### 0. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7117 FPCK: 310-725-6816 ONE COPY



### The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FPCK: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-0204 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 141.89 Maintenance of personnel, facilities, and equipment. The holder of a pilot school certificate or provisional pilot school certificate may not provide training to a student who is enrolled in an approved course of training unless: ( a ) Each airport, aircraft, and facility necessary for that training meets the standards specified in the holder's approved training course outline and the appropriate requirements of this part; and
( b ) Except as provided in § 141.87 of this part, each chief instructor, assistant chief instructor, check instructor, or instructor meets the qualifications specified in the holder's approved course of training and the appropriate requirements of this part.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3229 Filed:06/01/18 Entered:06/01/18 15:59:00 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3229 Filed:06/01/18 Entered:06/01/18 15:59:00 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3229 Filed:06/01/18 Entered:06/01/18 15:59:00 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3229 Filed:06/01/18 Entered:06/01/18 15:59:00 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3229 Filed:06/01/18 Entered:06/01/18 15:59:00 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 6
c#:3229 Filed:06/01/18 Entered:06/01/

Document Page 6 of 6
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of N.L.D., a Child

No. 06-13-00046-CV

Appeal from the 354th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 75,763). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating. Dissenting Opinion by Chief 

Justice Morriss.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. We affirm the trial court’s appointment of Jimmy and Angela 

Black as managing conservators. Having found the evidence legally insufficient to support 

termination, we reverse the trial court’s order terminating Tamara Haines’ parental rights and 

remand the case for determination of possible managing conservatorship, possessory 

conservatorship, visitation, child support, and any other necessary orders.

We further order that the appellant and appellees shall each pay one half of all costs of 

appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 23, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk