alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 135.503 Hazardous materials training: General. ( a ) Each certificate holder must establish and implement a hazardous materials training program that: ( 1 ) Satisfies the requirements of Appendix O of part 121 of this part;
( 2 ) Ensures that each person performing or directly supervising any of the job functions specified in § 135.501(a) is trained to comply with all applicable parts of 49 CFR parts 171 through 180 and the requirements of this subpart; and
( 3 ) Enables the trained person to recognize items that contain, or may contain, hazardous materials regulated by 49 CFR parts 171 through 180.
( b ) Each certificate holder must provide initial hazardous materials training and recurrent hazardous materials training to each crewmember and person performing or directly supervising any of the job functions specified in § 135.501(a).
( c ) Each certificate holder's hazardous materials training program must be approved by the FAA prior to implementation.
§ 27.1145 Ignition switches. ( a ) There must be means to quickly shut off all ignition by the grouping of switches or by a master ignition control.
( b ) Each group of ignition switches, except ignition switches for turbine engines for which continuous ignition is not required, and each master ignition control must have a means to prevent its inadvertent operation.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, 72 Stat. 752, 775, 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423; sec. 6(c), 49 U.S.C. 1655(c))
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-12, 42 FR 15045, Mar. 17, 1977]
§ 142.9 Deviations or waivers. ( a ) The Administrator may issue deviations or waivers from any of the requirements of this part.
( b ) A training center applicant requesting a deviation or waiver under this section must provide the Administrator with information acceptable to the Administrator that shows— ( 1 ) Justification for the deviation or waiver; and
( 2 ) That the deviation or waiver will not adversely affect the quality of instruction or evaluation.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO

 as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.,

Debtors.

1

 PROMESA

 Title III

 No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

 (Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICE

To the Honorable United States District Court Judge Laura Taylor Swain:

COMES NOW, the undersigned counsel, and respectfully sets forth as follows:

1. Creditor and/or party in interest COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CREDITO 

VEGA ALTA has retained the services of the undersigned’s law firm to represent it in the instant 

case.

2. Therefore, the undersigned respectfully requests that all pleadings, orders, notices, 

and documents filed and entered in this case be notified upon the undersigned counsel.

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested from this Honorable Court to enter an order 

for all notices, pleadings, orders and documents filed in this case to be sent to the undersigned..

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this date, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all 

CM/ECF participants. 

 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last four (4) 

digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are 9i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283- LTS) (Last Four Digits of federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales tax 

Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3001 Filed:05/02/18 Entered:05/02/18 17:57:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. 

In San Juan, Puerto Rico this 2nd day of May, 2018.

ALMEIDA & DÁVILA, P.S.C.

PO Box 191757

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00919-1757

Phone: (787) 722-2500

Fax: (787) 777-1376

/S/ ENRIQUE M. ALMEIDA BERNAL

USDC-PR 217701

Email: ealmeida@almeidadavila.com

/S/ ZELMA DÁVILA CARRASQUILLO

USDC-PR 218913

Email: zdavila@almeidadavila.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3001 Filed:05/02/18 Entered:05/02/18 17:57:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 16.221 Witness fees. ( a ) The party on whose behalf a witness appears is responsible for paying any witness fees and mileage expenses.
( b ) Except for employees of the United States summoned to testify as to matters related to their public employment, witnesses summoned by subpoena shall be paid the same fees and mileage expenses as are paid to a witness in a court of the United States in comparable circumstances.
<PAGE>




                                 EXHIBIT (10)(a)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

<PAGE>

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports (1)
dated February 14, 2003 with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements
and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company and (2) dated January 31,
2003 with respect to the subaccounts of Separate Account VA P, which are
available for investment by contract owners of Flexible Premium Variable
Annuity -- A, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration
Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-98891) and related Prospectus of Flexible Premium
Variable Annuity -- A.

                                                        /s/Ernst & Young LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
April 25, 2003
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.1    
    


 
 

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
  INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS    
    


We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Amendment No. 3 to Form F-3 No. 333-85922) and related Prospectus of Cardiome Pharma Corp. (the "Company") for the
registration of 9,620,988 common shares of our report dated February 5, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended November 30, 2002
included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F). 



	Vancouver, Canada	 	 
	May 5, 2003	 	Chartered Accountants











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.1


CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

#### § 21.141 Issuance.

The FAA issues a production certificate after finding that the applicant complies with the requirements of this subpart.
§ 25.337 Limit maneuvering load factors. ( a ) Except where limited by maximum (static) lift coefficients, the airplane is assumed to be subjected to symmetrical maneuvers resulting in the limit maneuvering load factors prescribed in this section. Pitching velocities appropriate to the corresponding pull-up and steady turn maneuvers must be taken into account.
( b ) The positive limit maneuvering load factor *n* for any speed up to *Vn* may not be less than 2.1 + 24,000/ (*W* + 10,000) except that *n* may not be less than 2.5 and need not be greater than 3.8—where *W* is the design maximum takeoff weight.
( c ) The negative limit maneuvering load factor— ( 1 ) May not be less than −1.0 at speeds up to *V* *C*; and
( 2 ) Must vary linearly with speed from the value at *V* *C* to zero at *V* *D*.
( d ) Maneuvering load factors lower than those specified in this section may be used if the airplane has design features that make it impossible to exceed these values in flight.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5672, Apr. 8, 1970]
#### Sam Mathis and Obe Mathis, *Plaintiffs in*Error, v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

1. In a criminal prosecution for murder where the defendant is a witness and is asked by his counsel if prior to that time he had ever been charged with any violation of law or had any trouble, such questions may be excluded when their relevancy is not shown, since they go to particular facts not in issue and not to the general reputation of the defendant.

2. An .affidavit in support of a ground of a motion for new trial should be evidenced to the appellate court by being incorporated in the bill of exceptions.

3. Where there is ample evidence to sustain a verdict and there is nothing to indicate that the jury was not governed by the evidence, the verdict will not be disturbed.

Writ of error to tbe Circuit Court of Jackson County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*Lewis*& Buford, and *Smith*& *Davis*for Plaintiff in Error;

*22*Park Trammell,*Attorney General, and *O. O. Andrews,*for the State.

Whitfield, C. J.

— The plaintiffs in error were convicted of murder in the first degree and took writ of error.

At the trial the court excluded the following question asked the defendant Sam Mathis by his counsel: “Have you ever, prior to this time, been charged with any violation of law?” The court also excluded the following questions asked the defendant Obe Mathis by his counsel: “Have you ever had any trouble prior to that time?” “Have you ever been charged prior to that time, with any violation of the law?”

These questions related to particular facts that do not appear to have been relevant to the issue being tried and were properly excluded. ’Whether the defendants had previously violated the law or had trouble is not shown to have had any bearing on the question of their guilt or innocence of the offense charged. The questions asked do not go to the general reputation of the defendant, and the particular issues of fact tendered by the questions were not within the purview of the issues being tried.

The ground of the motion for new trial that intoxicating liquor was used by the jury when considering their verdict cannot be passed upon as there is no evidence in the bill of exceptions to support the motion.- The affidavit of a juror as to the use of. beer and whiskey in the jury room copied into the record proper cannot be considered as evidence of a matter *in pais*even if the affidavit of a juror is competent evidence for the purpose and the statements therein could effect the verdict rendered.

, There is ample evidence to sustain the verdict and there is nothing to indicate that the jury was not governed *23by the evidence in reaching their verdict even if the affidavit above mentioned be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Taylor, Shackleford’ Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.'
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.51 Territorial application. ( a ) *Specific points of origin and destination.* Except as otherwise provided in this part, the specific points of origin and destination from and to which the fares apply shall be specifically named directly in connection with the respective fares.
( b ) *Directional application.* A tariff shall specifically indicate directly in connection with the fares therein whether they apply “from” and “to” or “between” the points named. Where the fares apply in one direction, the terms “From” and “To” shall be shown in connection with the point of origin and point of destination, respectively, and, where the fares apply in both directions between the points, the terms “Between” and “And” shall be shown in connection with the respective points.
11th Court of Appeals Mandate

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 29TH DISTRICT COURT OF PALO PINTO COUNTY, GREETINGS:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, on February 8, 2018,

the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Terry McCain et ux, Barbara McCain

11th Court of Appeals No. 11-17-00213-CV and

29th District Court Case No. C46601

Reeder Distributors, Inc. and Gary Reeder

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

 “This court has considered Appellants’ motion to dismiss this appeal and

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this

appeal are taxed against Terry McCain et ux, Barbara McCain."

WHEREFORE WE COMMAND YOU To observe the order of our said Court of

Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the HON. JOHN M. BAILEY,

Justice of this said Court, with the seal

thereof annexed at the City of Eastland,

on March 2, 2018.

SHERRY WILLIAMSON, CLERK

By: Cheryl Busk, Deputy

FILE COPY
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, ELEVENTH DISTRICT, AT EASTLAND

No. 11-17-00213-CV

Terry McCain et ux, Barbara McCain

v.

Reeder Distributors, Inc. and Gary Reeder

(No. C46601 IN 29TH DISTRICT COURT OF PALO PINTO COUNTY)

COURTS OF APPEAL:

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/NOT

PAID

DATE BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

FILING

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$205.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

02/05/2018

12/29/2017

11/27/2017

10/25/2017

08/28/2017

CORA L MOORE

CORA L MOORE

CORA L MOORE

CORA L MOORE

CORA L MOORE

TRIAL COURT FEE:

Clerk’s Record - unknown

Balance of costs owing to the Eleventh Court of Appeals, Eastland, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, Sherry Williamson, CLERK OF THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same

appears of record in this office.

WITNESS, the HON. JOHN M. BAILEY,

Justice of this said Court, with the seal

thereof annexed at the City of Eastland,

on March 2, 2018.

SHERRY WILLIAMSON, CLERK

By: Cheryl Busk, Deputy

FILE COPY
Exhibit D

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2739-6 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 18:40:36 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 1 of 2
Exhibit D

Summary of Expenses

Total

$ 6,115.42

 1,445.00

 1,153.35

 791.39

 141.31

 79.20

Grand Total $ 9,725.67

Direct Charges

Copy Charges

EXHIBIT D: Summary of Expenses Incurred During the Interim Period

Category

Travel & Lodging

Meals

Phone

Postage/Courier

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2739-6 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 18:40:36 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 2 of 2
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00112

- CR

T AYTON S ETH F INLEY

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 5

of Tarrant County ( 1607688 )

September 22, 2022

Opinion by Justice Walker

( p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the tr ia l court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
#### § 25.1525 Kinds of operation.

The kinds of operation to which the airplane is limited are established by the category in which it is eligible for certification and by the installed equipment.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-366-CV

IN RE FREQUENT FLYER DEPOT, INC.,					 RELATORS

GEORGE PIRKLE, AND ROBERT PIRKLE	

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied because relators have an adequate remedy by appeal.  Accordingly, the court denies relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief.

	Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED:  September 15, 2008
# Official Journal C 109/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 109 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 631 April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 109

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 631 April 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2020/C 109/01 | Opinion No 1/2020
  (pursuant to Article 322(1)(a), TFEU)
  concerning the Commission’s proposal for a regulation on transitional provisions relating to the common agricultural policy in the year 2021 (COM(2019) 581 final) | 1 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2020/C 109/01

Opinion No 1/2020
  (pursuant to Article 322(1)(a), TFEU)
  concerning the Commission’s proposal for a regulation on transitional provisions relating to the common agricultural policy in the year 2021 (COM(2019) 581 final)

(pursuant to Article 322(1)(a), TFEU)

(COM(2019) 581 final)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```
[House Report 112-31]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]


112th Congress                                             Rept. 112-31
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     Part 2

======================================================================



 
                    THE HAMP TERMINATION ACT OF 2011

                                _______
                                

 March 14, 2011.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

         Mr. Bachus, from the Committee on Financial Services, 
                        submitted the following

                          SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

                        [To accompany H.R. 839]

                     REASON FOR SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

    This supplemental report shows the updated information for 
the Committee Consideration of H.R. 839, as reported, (H. Rept. 
111-31):

                        COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

    The Committee on Financial Services met in open session on 
March 9, 2011 and ordered H.R. 839, the HAMP Termination Act, 
as amended, favorably reported to the House by a recorded vote 
of 32 yeas and 23 nays, (Record vote No. FC-19).

                                  

```
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of UltraStrip Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Rushing III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/  JAMESC. RUSHINGIII
| | James C. Rushing III,  
| | Chief Financial Officer
| |                        





Date:  August 9, 2006







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 310.12 Penalties.

Subsection (i)(3) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(3)) imposes criminal penalties for obtaining Corporation records on individuals under false pretenses. The subsection provides as follows:

Any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record concerning an individual from an agency under false pretenses shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.
§ 23.2425 Powerplant operational characteristics. ( a ) The installed powerplant must operate without any hazardous characteristics during normal and emergency operation within the range of operating limitations for the airplane and the engine.
( b ) The pilot must have the capability to stop the powerplant in flight and restart the powerplant within an established operational envelope.
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer
of GPC Capital Corp. II that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations
of the Company for such period.


Dated:   February 24, 2003

                              By:     /s/ Philip R. Yates
                                      Philip R. Yates
                                      President, Treasurer and Assistant
                                      Secretary and Director
                                      (chief executive officer)



                              By:     /s/ John E. Hamilton
                                      John E. Hamilton
                                      Vice President, Secretary and Assistant
                                      Treasurer and Director
                                      (chief financial officer)




                                       1
<PAGE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.162 Receiver shall file adoption notices.

A receiver shall, immediately upon assuming control of a carrier, issue and file with the Department an adoption notices as prescribed by §§ 221.160 and 221.161 and shall comply with the requirements of this subpart.