alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 171.275 Reports. The owner of the ISMLS facility or his maintenance representative must make the following reports at the indicated time to the appropriate FAA Regional Office where the facility is located. ( a ) *Facility Equipment Performance and Adjustment Data* (*FAA Form 198*). The FAA Form 198 shall be filled out by the owner or his maintenance representative with the equipment adjustments and meter readings as of the time of facility commissioning. One copy must be kept in the permanent records of the facility and two copies must be sent to the appropriate FAA Regional Office. The owner or his maintenance representative must revise the FAA Form 198 data after any major repair, modernization, or retuning to reflect an accurate record of facility operation and adjustment. In the event the data are revised, the owner or his maintenance representative shall notify the appropriate FAA Regional Office of such revisions, and forward copies of the revisions to the appropriate FAA Regional Office.
( b ) *Facility Maintenance Log* (*FAA Form 6030*-*1*). FAA Form 6030-1 is a permanent record of all the activities required to maintain the ISMLS facility. The entries must include all malfunctions met in maintaining the facility including information on the kind of work and adjustments made, equipment failures, causes (if determined) and corrective action taken. In addition, the entries must include completion of periodic maintenance required to maintain the facility. The owner or his maintenance representative must keep the original of each form at the facility and send a copy to the appropriate FAA Regional Office at the end of each month in which it is prepared. However, where an FAA approved remote monitoring system is installed which precludes the need for periodic maintenance visits to the facility, monthly reports from the remote monitoring system control point must be forwarded to the appropriate FAA Regional Office, and a hard copy retained at the control point.
( c ) *Technical Performance Record* (*FAA Form 418*). FAA Form 418 contains a record of system parameters, recorded on each scheduled visit to the facility. The owner or his maintenance representative shall keep the original of each month's record at the facility and send a copy of the form to the appropriate FAA Regional Office.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO,

Debtor.

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17-BK-03283 (LTS)

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO

as representative of 

PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING

CORPORATION (“COFINA”),

Debtor.

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17-BK-03284 (LTS)

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Peter B. Siegal hereby respectfully withdraws his 

appearance as counsel for The Ad Hoc Group of General Obligation Bondholders (the “GO 

Group”), a party-in-interest in the above-captioned Title III case, and requests removal from 

service of any further pleadings in connection with this matter. At this time, Mr. Siegal is no 

longer affiliated with Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, counsel of 

record for the GO Group.

The appearances by other Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP

attorneys are unaffected by this request.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3436 Filed:07/05/18 Entered:07/05/18 13:10:55 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date, I electronically filed this notice with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all 

participants and attorneys of record.

Dated: July 5, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Peter B. Siegal

Peter B. Siegal

Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP

799 9

th Street NW, Suite 1000

Washington, DC 20001

peter.siegal@nortonrosefulbright.com

Telephone: (202) 662-4663

Facsimile: (202) 662-4643

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3436 Filed:07/05/18 Entered:07/05/18 13:10:55 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40485 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SANTOS CABALLERO-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-87-1

-------------------- September 28, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKDSALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santos Caballero-Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Caballero-Reyes received copies of counsel's motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 12/09/03 

CASE NUMBER: P04-0139

RELATED CASES: 

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS 

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX 

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 2 2 

KEYWORDS: IRR/CORR-E,S,MM,L 

 LUNG DEVEL 

 AQUATOX 

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT 

FATE: Solid; ; Estimations for P-140 low MW274 LogKow = -

1.55(E)S = Disp.(ICB); H < 1.00E-8(E) 

MP (C) = 250(E); BP (C) > 400(E); VP @ 25C (mm) < 1.0E-6(E) 

LogKoc = 1.28(E); LogBCF = 0.50(E); 

POTW removal (%) = 139/40: 90 via biodeg; P-139 OECD : 

91.6%/28d; OECD 301E(Mod Screening): 71.5%/28d; P140 OECD 

301B(Mod Sturm CO2 Ev): 77.5%/28d RB;141: 50 via sorption & 

biodeg; P-141 BOD5/COD=58.5%; OECD 301E(Mod Screening): 38.9%/28d 

NRB; OECD: 60%/28d; River Die AwayTest (5d/10d/15d/20d): 

35%/59%/79%/90%; OECD 301D(Closed Bottle) 2 & 10mg/L:90.1 & 

82.2%/28d. Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo 

PBT Potential: P1B1T2 Sorption to soils/sediments = low 

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow - moderate 

HEALTH: Absorption is poor from the skin, poor from the GI 

tract, and moderate from the lung (analog). Concern for 

surfactant effects on the lung; and irritation and possible 

corrosion to all tissues based on submitted test data. An analog, 

inner salt, was tested in 2 developmental toxicity studies. In 

an oral study in rats , delayed development was seen at 250 

mg/kg/d and preimplantation loss was seen at 150 and 250 mg/kg/d; 

decreased maternal weight gain was noted at all doses (50, 150, 

250 mg/kg/d). In a pilot dermal study in rabbits, fetal 

resorptions were seen at 40 mg/kg/d and greater; decreased litter 

size was seen at 100 mg/kg/d and greater; 3 of 8 maternal animals 

died at 100 and 200 mg/kg/d; skin irritation was noted at all 

dose levels; and partial paralysis and uncoordinated movement was 

seen at 40 mg/kg/d. The NOEL was 20 mg/kg/d for all effects but 

skin irritation. 

 *CEB HEALTH: Moderate concern (Dermal, inhalation) 

 Test data: rabbit dermal LD0 > 2000 mg/kg, erythema, 

corrosion, edema; moderate eye irritation in rabbits; moderate 

skin irritation in rabbits 
ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L 

(ppm) are: 

fish 96-h LC50 < 4.7 P 

daphnid 48-h LC50 < 5.0 P 

green algal 96-h EC50 < 5.0 P 

fish chronic value < 0.500 P 

daphnid ChV < 0.500 P 

algal ChV < 1.0 P 

Predictions are based on SAR-nearest analog method for 

-, RT96=3.3mg/L, with MW adjustment; SAR chemical 

class = ; MW425; pH7; effective concentrations 

based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 

concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; 

moderate concern for toxicity 

assessment factor = 10.0 

concern concentration = 0.050 mg/L (ppm) 

*CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water 

SAT Co-chair: Leonard Keifer 564-8916
#### § 258.4 Unfair and deceptive practice.

The holding out or sale of scheduled passenger air transportation that involves change-of-gauge service is prohibited as an unfair or deceptive practice or an unfair method of competition within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712 unless, in conjunction with such holding out or sale, carriers and ticket agents follow the requirements of this part.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

F.J., the father,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD 

LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellees.

No. 4D2023-2014

[December 5, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Stacey Schulman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2020-

2530CJDP.

Thomas J. Butler of Thomas Butler, P.A., Miami Beach, for appellant.

Carolyn Schwarz of Children’s Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee Department of Children and Families.

Joshua Byrne Spector of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Miami, 

and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, 

Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Ryan, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





September 8, 2011
/s/Christopher J. RyanChristopher J. RyanChief Executive Officer, President and Secretary
§ 158.20 Submission of required documents. ( a ) Letters and reports required by this part may be transmitted to the appropriate recipient (the public agency, air carrier, and/or the FAA) via e-mail, courier, facsimile, or U.S. Postal Service. ( 1 ) Documents sent electronically to the FAA must be prepared in a format readable by the FAA. Interested parties can obtain the format at their local FAA Airports Office.
( 2 ) Any transmission to FAA Headquarters, using regular U.S. Postal Service, is subject to inspection that may result in delay and damage due to the security process.
( b ) Once the database development is completed with air carrier capability, public agencies and air carriers may use the FAA's national PFC database to post their required quarterly reports, and, in that case, do not have to distribute the reports in any other way.
[Doc. No. FAA-2006-23730, 72 FR 28848, May 23, 2007]
EXHIBIT 4 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3424-4 Filed:07/03/18 Entered:07/03/18 18:57:15 Desc:

Exhibit 4 - Filed Under Seal Page 1 of 2
FILED UNDER SEAL 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3424-4 Filed:07/03/18 Entered:07/03/18 18:57:15 Desc:

Exhibit 4 - Filed Under Seal Page 2 of 2
Institutional

Tax Reform

I, Gladys Rodríguez-Fornaris, MA in Translation (UPR 1995), DO CERTIFY that I have translated into English the foregoing document,as submitted in Spanish by the interested party; and that said translation is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and abilities. S/ GLADYS RODRÍGUEZ-FORNARIS

Department of the Treasuryof Puerto Rico
#### BELLAMY V. THE STATE.

(Decided November 20, 1913.)

Appeal from Lee Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. Lum Duke.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 135.89 Pilot requirements: Use of oxygen. ( a ) *Unpressurized aircraft.* Each pilot of an unpressurized aircraft shall use oxygen continuously when flying— ( 1 ) At altitudes above 10,000 feet through 12,000 feet MSL for that part of the flight at those altitudes that is of more than 30 minutes duration; and
( 2 ) Above 12,000 feet MSL.
( b ) *Pressurized aircraft.* ( 1 ) Whenever a pressurized aircraft is operated with the cabin pressure altitude more than 10,000 feet MSL, each pilot shall comply with paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) Whenever a pressurized aircraft is operated at altitudes above 25,000 feet through 35,000 feet MSL, unless each pilot has an approved quick-donning type oxygen mask— ( i ) At least one pilot at the controls shall wear, secured and sealed, an oxygen mask that either supplies oxygen at all times or automatically supplies oxygen whenever the cabin pressure altitude exceeds 12,000 feet MSL; and
( ii ) During that flight, each other pilot on flight deck duty shall have an oxygen mask, connected to an oxygen supply, located so as to allow immediate placing of the mask on the pilot's face sealed and secured for use.
( 3 ) Whenever a pressurized aircraft is operated at altitudes above 35,000 feet MSL, at least one pilot at the controls shall wear, secured and sealed, an oxygen mask required by paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
( 4 ) If one pilot leaves a pilot duty station of an aircraft when operating at altitudes above 25,000 feet MSL, the remaining pilot at the controls shall put on and use an approved oxygen mask until the other pilot returns to the pilot duty station of the aircraft.
Exhibit 10.1


 


Consent of
independent accountants


 


 


We hereby consent to the use in
this Annual Report on Form 20-F of our report dated February 10, 2003, relating
to the financial statements of Magyar Távközlési Rt., which appear in such
Annual Report. We also consent to the references to us under the headings “Selected Financial Data” in such Annual
Report.


 


 


PricewaterhouseCoopers


 


 


Budapest

May 9, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

and the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost
Plus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Barry J. Feld, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Jane
L. Baughman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Barry J. Feld                                                                                            
|Barry J. Feld Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)                            
|                                                                                                             
|June 11, 2009                                                                                                
|                                                                                                             
|/s/ Jane L. Baughman                                                                                         
|Jane L. Baughman Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)
|                                                                                                             
|June 11, 2009
# Official Journal C 152/23 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 152 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4823 June 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 152

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4823 June 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 152/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 152/2 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 152/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 152/2

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid (1)

2

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 152/3 | Call for Proposals 2005 — Specific projects in the field of consumer affairs | 10 |

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 152/3

Call for Proposals 2005 — Specific projects in the field of consumer affairs

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 1275.105 Conduct of the OIG investigation of research misconduct. ( a ) The OIG shall make every reasonable effort to complete a NASA research misconduct investigation and issue a report within 120 days after initiating the investigation. The OIG may extend this period of time for good cause.
( b ) A NASA investigation may include: ( 1 ) Review of award files, reports, and other documents readily available at NASA or in the public domain;
( 2 ) Review of procedures or methods and inspection of laboratory materials, specimens, and records at awardee institutions;
( 3 ) Interviews with parties or witnesses;
( 4 ) Review of any documents or other evidence provided by or properly obtainable from parties, witnesses, or other sources;
( 5 ) Cooperation with other Federal agencies; and
( 6 ) Opportunity for the Respondent to be heard.
( c ) The OIG may invite outside consultants or experts to participate in a NASA investigation.
( d ) During the course of the investigation, the OIG shall provide a draft of the investigation report to the Respondent, who shall be invited to submit comments. The Respondent must submit any comments within 20 days of receipt of the draft investigation report. This period of time may be extended by the OIG for good cause. Any comments submitted by the Respondent shall receive full consideration before the investigation report is made final.
( e ) At the end of the investigation proceedings, an investigation report must be prepared that shall include recommended findings as to whether research misconduct has occurred. A recommended finding of research misconduct requires that: ( 1 ) There be a significant departure from accepted practices of the relevant research community for maintaining the integrity of the research record;
( 2 ) The research misconduct be committed intentionally, knowingly, or in reckless disregard of accepted practices; and
( 3 ) The allegation be proven by a preponderance of evidence.
( f ) The investigation report must also be transmitted with the recommendations for administrative action, when recommended findings of research misconduct are made. Section 1275.106 lists possible recommended administrative actions and considerations for use in determining appropriate recommendations.
( g ) NASA OIG may elect to proceed with its administrative investigation processes in lieu of a research misconduct investigation under this part when the allegation is against a civil service employee (an intramural researcher).
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit

No. 02-2223 FRANCES STONKUS, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. CITY OF BROCKTON SCHOOL DEPARTMENT; RICHARD E. ZOINO; ANTONIO M. CABRAL, Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this court issued on March 14, 2003, is amended as follows: Page 5, lines 7-8: "August 15, 2001" should be "August 15, 2002"
EXHIBIT C

COMPENSATION BY PROJECT CATEGORY 

Matter

Total 

Billed 

Hours

Total Fees

ADV. 17-151, 17-152 – PEAJE 9.7 $3,197.50

ADV. 17-155, 17-156, 17-159 – ASSURED; AMBAC 8.1 $2,015.00

ADV. 17-189 – ACP MASTER LTD 8.4 $2,422.50

ADV. 17-213 – ERS v. ALTAIR 13.8 $3,732.50

ADV. 17-219, 17-220 – ALTAIR v. ERS 15.1 $4,847.50

ADV. 17-228, 17-229 – UTIER 24.3 $8,137.50

ADV. 17-257 – UCC v. WHYTE 65.8 $22,055.00

CASE ADMINISTRATION/MISCELLANEOUS 129.2 $33,800.00

CHALLENGES TO PROMESA 1.3 $325.00

COMMITTEE GOVERNANCE AND MEETINGS 142.4 $41,587.50

COMMUNICATIONS WITH RETIREES 59.2 $16,937.50

COURT HEARINGS 21.1 $7,912.50

EMPLOYMENT OF PROFESSIONALS/FEE APPLICATIONS 7.9 $2,925.00

ERS BONDS ISSUES 13.9 $4,100.00

FISCAL PLAN/PLAN OF ADJUSTMENT 88.5 $31,067.50

GO BONDS ISSUES 4.7 $1,337.50

GO/COFINA ISSUES 58.8 $12,812.50

HEALTHCARE/OPEB ANALYSIS 2.0 $525.00

MEDIATION 113.2 $36,862.50

PENSION ANALYSIS 52.5 $15,000.00

RULE 2004 INVESTIGATION 0.3 $112.50

NON-WORKING TRAVEL TIME (50% hourly rate) 111.8 $18,450.00

Total 952.0 $270,162.50 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2743-3 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:15:35 Desc:

Exhibit C Page 1 of 1
#### § 152.311 Availability of contractor's records.

The sponsor or planning agency shall include in each contract of the cost reimbursable type a clause that allows any authorized representative of the Administrator, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Comptroller General of the United States access to the contractor's records pertinent to the contract for the purposes of accounting and audit.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                          SECTION 906 CEO CERTIFICATION

                Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of
                Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

      I, John E. Elliott, II, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Arcadia Resources, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge, (i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Arcadia Resources, Inc.

                               /s/ John E. Elliott, II
                               -------------------------------------
                               Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 14, 2006

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Arcadia Resources, Inc. The statement will be retained by Arcadia
Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.