alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2234-000]

Take notice that on April 18, 2000, the East Central Area Reliability Council (ECAR), on behalf of Allegheny Power, American Electric Power Co., Big Rivers Electric Corp., Cinergy Corp., Consumers Energy Co., The Dayton Power and Light Co., the Detroit Edison Co., Duquesne Light Co., East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc., FirstEnergy Corp., Hoosier Energy REC, Indianapolis Power and Light Co., LG&E Energy Corp., Northern Indiana Public Service Co., Ohio Valley Electric Corp., and Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Co., submitted for filing an Inadvertent Settlement Tariff that is intended to obligate each party to make payment and to entitle each party to receive compensation for Inadvertent Interchange from each other party pursuant to ECAR's Inadvertent Settlement Procedure.

ECAR requests the Inadvertent Settlement Tariff to go into effect by June 1, 2000 for the 2000 peak summer season.

ECAR states that all parties were served and that the filing is also available on their web site (www.ecar.org).

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before May 9, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10993  Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 135.324 Training program: Special rules. ( a ) Other than the certificate holder, only another certificate holder certificated under this part or a training center certificated under part 142 of this chapter is eligible under this subpart to conduct training, testing, and checking under contract or other arrangement to those persons subject to the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) A certificate holder may contract with, or otherwise arrange to use the services of, a training center certificated under part 142 of this chapter to conduct training, testing, and checking required by this part only if the training center— ( 1 ) Holds applicable training specifications issued under part 142 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Has facilities, training equipment, and courseware meeting the applicable requirements of part 142 of this chapter;
( 3 ) Has approved curriculums, curriculum segments, and portions of curriculum segments applicable for use in training courses required by this subpart; and
( 4 ) Has sufficient instructor and check pilots qualified under the applicable requirements of §§ 135.337 through 135.340 to provide training, testing, and checking to persons subject to the requirements of this subpart.
[Doc. No. 26933, 61 FR 34562, July 2, 1996, as amended by Amdt. 135-67, 62 FR 13791, Mar. 21, 1997; Amdt. 135-91, 68 FR 54588, Sept. 17, 2003; Docket No. FAA-2019-0360; Amdt. No. 135-145, 89 FR 51431, June 18, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      72,039,498
<SECURITIES>                               165,591,010
<RECEIVABLES>                                  503,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,765
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           241,456,811
<PP&E>                                      47,020,107
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,999,689
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             294,105,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,891,923
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,605
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,370,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               294,105,357
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,090,661
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,501,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,065,778
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,898,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (28,625,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (28,625,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (4,730,667)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (33,355,793)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 1241.35 Claims review and decisions. ( a ) NASA will establish the TREAT Astronauts Act Board (TAAB) to review claims for medical monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment under this program. This review is independent of any review conducted by primary payers.
( b ) The TAAB will review each claim submitted by the eligible individual, in consultation with specialists, as appropriate. A typical case will be reviewed within 30 calendar days, but cases that are more complex may take additional time.
( c ) The TAAB will make a recommendation to the Administrator or designee for each claim stating whether the condition is determined to be spaceflight associated.
( d ) For those eligible individuals who have had other exposures in addition to those experienced during their career as active U.S. Government astronauts or payload specialists, the TAAB will consider that history when making its recommendation.
( e ) The NASA Administrator or designee will review each claim and associated TAAB recommendation to determine whether the claim should be approved or denied. A typical case can be reviewed within 30 calendar days, but cases that are more complex may take additional time.
( f ) The decision will be provided to the eligible individual within seven calendar days of the final decision by the NASA Administrator or designee. Decisions not in favor of the eligible individual will include information on how to request reconsideration.
( g ) An eligible individual or their authorized representative may request reconsideration of the decision at any time if new information is obtained that enhances the claim. Reconsideration requests can be made to the JSC Flight Medicine Clinic.
( h ) Requests for reconsideration are reviewed by the TAAB and decisions made by the Administrator or designee, following the same process described in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section.
Exhibit 99.3

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION.
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2003 (the Report) by CGI Group, Inc. (the Company),
the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| |  |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 16, 2004

| |                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Serge Godin              Serge Godin
Chairman of the Board and
  Chief Executive Officer
U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of tlie Secretary of Transporttrtion 

DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR 

•PARTMENTOF 

ANSFORWION ^ 

K M OPERATIONS SERVICE OF NOTICE, PROCESS, ORDERS 

DECISIONS, OPERATIONS SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS 

r;M vFP 20 A ^:-32 

Federal Aviation Administration 

South Florida FSDO-19 

La Torre de Plaza Las Americas 

525 F.D. Roosevelt Ave. Suite 901 

San Juan, P.R. 00918-1198 

Sunrise Airlines. Inc. d/b/a Mario's Air ^ having its principalofRce at 

(Name of Company, please print) 

Building 448. Rafael Hernandez Airport. AguadiHa. P.R. 00604 

(Address) 

hereby designates, pursuant to section 46103 and 41302 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code, as amended, the 

person named below as its Agent upon service of all notice, process, all orders, decisions, and 

requirements of the Department of Transportation may be made for and on behalf of said carrier, 

hereby canceling all previous designations of agents made by it to the FAA, DOT or Board.The person 

named below is authorized to sign for and agree to the Operations Specifications, issued to the above 

mentioned company, governing flight operations into the United States. 

Name of Agent: Luis A. irizarrv. L A. Irizanv & Associates, inc. 

(Please Print) 

Address: PO Box 37217. San Juan. Puerto Rico 00937-0217 

Phone Number: (787) 752-7621Fax Number (787) 276-3846Email: iri2arrv@icenetworl(S.com 

is initials in the following spa] 

(Initials). 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF.Sunrise Airlines/fnc. d/b/a Mario's Airhas caused ^sepresen U to be 

(Name of Cona^nv) 

signed in itsname by, Mario Mimbella , President ofeaid company, 

(Please Print) 

and to be attested under its corporate seal bvSunrise Airiines. Inc. d/b/a Mario's Air .General Manager 

(Seaetaiy or ottier Title) 

on this 12^dav of September. 2011. 

ATTEST: 

(Secretary or other officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              MAY-4-1997              FEB-2-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                AUG-2-1997              AUG-2-1997
<CASH>                                          12,688                       0
<SECURITIES>                                    38,252                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,904                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    112,056                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,348                       0
<PP&E>                                         171,124                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,428                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 279,532                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,946                       0
<BONDS>                                         59,416                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,000                       0
<COMMON>                                            58                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,414                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   279,532                       0
<SALES>                                         95,114                 180,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,114                 180,243
<CGS>                                           72,266                 137,418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,892                  55,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   506                     930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,134                   2,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,550)                (13,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,275)                 (5,530)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,275)                 (7,958)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,275)                 (7,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.21)                 ($0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.21)                 ($0.49)
        

</TABLE>
BILL OF EXCEPTIONS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

June, 1898.]

Cox, Smith and Swing, JJ.

#### Hauck Brewing Co. v. Giseke et al.

Bill oe Exceptions Rendered, Invalid When—

A bill of exceptions is probably rendered invalid where subsequent to its being signed, sealed and allowed, special charges asked and refused are added thereto and the bill as thus enlarged is not resigned and sealed and allowed.

.Swing, J.

We think it very doubtful whether there is any bill of exceptions here for us to consider. The record discloses that on March 30,1895, a bill of exceptions was allowed, signed and sealed and made a part of the record. And it further discloses the following entry on the journal of the court:

> “ It appearing to the court that the special charges asked by the plaintiff and special charges asked by the defendant and ruled on by the court were by inadvertence omitted from the bill of exceptions, heretofore, to-wit, March 30, 1895, allowed by the court and filed herein, on motion of the defendant it is ordered that the entry allowing said bill of exceptions and the filing thereof be and the same are .hereby set aside and held for naught. And now comes the defendant and presents to the court his certain bill of exceptions, embodying all the evidence and the •charges of the court, which having been examined by plaintiff’s •counsel, and being found by the court to be true, is allowed, signed and ¡sealed, and on motion is hereby made part of the record of this case.”

Which entry was made April 27, 1895.

We find a bill of exceptions among the papers which was signed by the judge, not on March 30 or April 27, but on April 5.

On the cover of the bill appears the following indorsement :

> “The within now includes the special charges inadvertently omitted when the bill was first filed, and it is ordered refiled as of this date.

> “Howard C. *Hollister,Judge.*

> “ April 27, 1895.”

The journal entry set aside the allowance and signing of the bill as of March 30, and says that the judge on April 27 signed and sealed a true bill which is made a part of the record ; but no bill is found which is signed and allowed as a bill of exceptions, but instead we frid the *373above on the bill, which says the bill is refiled as of that date. Ordering a bill to be refiled can hardly be considered as equivalent to signing, sealing and allowing a bill, and was hardly so considered by the judge as what the judge did was simply to endorse the above words on the cover of the bill and not in the place usual for the signing of the bill, to-wit, at the end of the bill; and if the bill was not signed and allowed on April 27, 1895, there is admittedly no bill of exceptions here.

*Von Seggern & Dewald,*for plaintiff.

*Corcoran &*Corcoran, for defendant.

But without regard to this question, we have gone over the whole record and considered all the questions raised by the plaintiff in error, with the result that we find no error in the record.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed.
#### § 17.51 Decorum and professional conduct.

Legal representatives are expected to conduct themselves at all times in a civil and respectful manner appropriate to an administrative forum. Additionally, counsel are expected to conduct themselves at all times in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable rules of professional conduct.
# Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production

**Other Analyses Secondary Impacts**  **February 7, 2012**

**Worksheet Names** Secondary Impacts Emission Factors

# Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production

**Description** MACT Floor Secondary Impacts Analyses Emission Factors Used in Secondary Impacts AnalysisElectricity [1] Pollutant lb/MW -hr lb/10^6 SCF lb/ft3 ton/ft3 CO2 1329 120000 0.12 0.00006 CO 84 8.00E-05 4.20E-08 Nox 1.9366 100 0.0001 5.00E-08 SO2 5.2589 [1] National em ission factors from Egrid for EGUs. [2] Natural gas emission factors from AP-42. EPA eGRID database eGRID2007 Version 1.1. Year 2005 summary tables located at www.epa.gov/cleanenergy /documents/egridzips/eGRID2007V1_1_y ear05_SummaryTables.pdf US EPA, 1995. Com pilation of Air Pollutant Em ission Factors (AP-42), Fifth Edition, Volume 1: Staitonary and Point Sources, Chapter 1: External Combustion Sources. Natural Gas [2]EPA eGRID database eGRID2007 Version 1.1. Year 2005 summary tables located at www.epa.gov/cleanenergy /documents/egridzips/eGRID2007V1_1_y ear05_SummaryTables.pdf US EPA, 1995. Com pilation of Air Pollutant Em ission Factors (AP-42), Fifth Edition, Volume 1: Staitonary and Point Sources, Chapter 1: External Combustion Sources.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of Public Law 92-463, the “Federal Advisory Committee Act,” notice of a meeting of the Board of Visitors for Department of Defense Centers for Regional Security must be published.

The Board will meet in closed session at the Pentagon on April 26 from 0900 to 1330.

The purpose of the meeting is to allow the Board of Visitors to provide advice on the role the Centers for Regional Security play in the broader U.S. national security context. The Board will hold classified discussions on various national security policies to be handled by the regional centers as outlined in the Defense Planning Guidance and related to the Theater Engagement Plans of the Commanders-in-Chief of the Unified Commands. This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to the meeting because of a scheduling oversight.

In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II (1982), it has been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. § 552b (c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John Berry, (703) 695-6386.

Dated: April 21, 2000.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-10749 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000-10-V
The HONORABLE GARY A. FENNER, United States District Judge for the *

Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-2474

___________

Michael Terril Cooper-Bey; *

Charles White Williams-El, *

*

Plaintiffs - Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Rusty Rogerson; Larry Hardy; Calvin *

Yoder; Elwin Colson, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendants - Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: June 10, 1997

Filed: July 17, 1997

___________

Before LOKEN and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and FENNER, District Judge. *

___________

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmates Michael Cooper-Bey and Charles Williams-El brought this § 1983

action seeking declaratory, equitable, and damage relief for alleged violations of their

rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Religious Freedom

Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb et seq. (“RFRA”). Defendants are four officials
The HONORABLE CELESTE F. BREMER, Chief United States Magistrate

1

Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, to whom the case was assigned by consent of

the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

of the Iowa Medical Classification Center (“IMCC”), a facility that receives and

classifies new inmates prior to their assignment to other Iowa prisons. Plaintiffs claim

that unique security measures adopted for inmates in IMCC’s classification reception

areas infringe their right to religious freedom as Moslem followers of the Moorish

Science Temple of America.

Following a bench trial, the district court granted judgment in favor of all

1

defendants, concluding that IMCC’s restrictions on group worship do not violate

plaintiffs’ rights, and that the other challenged practices do not substantially burden the

exercise of their beliefs. Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their constitutional and

RFRA claims. The Supreme Court held RFRA unconstitutional in City of Boerne v.

Flores, No. 95-2074, 1997 WL 345322 (U.S. Jun. 25, 1997). We uphold dismissal of

plaintiffs’ constitutional claims for the reasons stated in the district court’s April 30,

1996, Opinion. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir.

Rule 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.