alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED AUGUST 24, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

^JB^RTMENTQF 

^'I'^NSPORTATION 

--'^'b l OPERATIONS 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SMITH CABLE SYSTEMS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP009AL0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FAA DOCKET No. FAA-2009-0976 

NOTICE OF TENTATIVE HEARING DATES 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

the week of October 19 through 22,2010, at the U.S. District Court for the District of 

Alaska, 222 W. 7"" Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99513.' 

Hearings will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties 

should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. Settled cases will not be 

removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper pleading(s). Pleadings 

may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service. 

SO ORDERED. 

U<Jferd C. (&bodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Juc 

Attachment - Service List 

' The undersigned is scheduled to hear a case in Anchorage, AK. during this period. The parties are 

advised to be prepared to taice testimony teiephonically of the remaining witnesses during this period. 

Arrangements will depend upon whether the undersigned is physically in Anchorage or elsewhere. In any 

case, the remaining testimony will be telephonic. 
B II 

| } 

M 

FAA Docket No. CP09AL0012 I 

(Civil Penalty Action) | | 

| | 

SERVICE LIST I 

| | 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY " I 

I 

Federal Aviation Administration M 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. || 

Washington, DC 20591 K 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, |: 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1OOO' | 

ONE COPY 

Ronald G. Smith, President 

Smith Cable Systems, Inc. 

Through Counsel 

Brent R. Cole, Respondent's Counsel 

Marston & Cole, P.C. 

821 N Street, Suite 208 

Anchorage, AK 99501-2136 

TEL: 907-277-8001 

FAX: 907-277-8002 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Coimsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West 7* Avenue, #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-3 66-213 9 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

I 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following ad(fress: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NT Holding Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James Loo, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: November 22, 2006


/s/ James Loo
-----------------------------------
James Loo
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officerof the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|                                                                                                                                                                             |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS  **Douglas P. Williams****Chief Financial Officer****November****13****,2002**   
 

21
  |
§ 135.389 Large nontransport category airplanes: Takeoff limitations. ( a ) No person operating a large nontransport category airplane may take off that airplane at a weight greater than the weight that would allow the airplane to be brought to a safe stop within the effective length of the runway, from any point during the takeoff before reaching 105 percent of minimum control speed (the minimum speed at which an airplane can be safely controlled in flight after an engine becomes inoperative) or 115 percent of the power off stalling speed in the takeoff configuration, whichever is greater.
( b ) For the purposes of this section— ( 1 ) It may be assumed that takeoff power is used on all engines during the acceleration;
( 2 ) Not more than 50 percent of the reported headwind component, or not less than 150 percent of the reported tailwind component, may be taken into account;
( 3 ) The average runway gradient (the difference between the elevations of the endpoints of the runway divided by the total length) must be considered if it is more than one-half of one percent;
( 4 ) It is assumed that the airplane is operating in standard atmosphere; and
( 5 ) For takeoff, *effective length of the runway* means the distance from the end of the runway at which the takeoff is started to a point at which the obstruction clearance plane associated with the other end of the runway intersects the runway centerline.
945 P.2d 312

#### CASSANDRA S., Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY and Edward S. and Leticia S., minors, Appellees.

No. CV-97-0239-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

July 23, 1997.

ORDER

The Court permitted Appellant Cassandra S. to file a delayed Petition for Review pursuant to this Court’s Order dated June 10, 1997, which directed that the delayed petition be filed by July 10, 1997. No Petition for Review having been filed pursuant to this Court’s Order,

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is dismissed.

/s/ Thomas A. Zlaket

THOMAS A. ZLAKET
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INDESCO
INTERNATIONAL, INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE TWLVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             377
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,682
<PP&E>                                          80,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,582
<BONDS>                                        167,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,062
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,165)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,846
<SALES>                                        102,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,861
<CGS>                                           78,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,734
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,936)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (3)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,933)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.804 Oath; false statements.

At the discretion of the officer conducting the investigation, testimony of a witness may be taken under oath and administered by the officer. Any person making false statements under oath during the course of a formal investigative proceeding is subject to the criminal penalties for perjury in 18 U.S.C. 1621. Any person who knowingly and willfully makes false and fraudulent statements, whether under oath or otherwise, or who falsifies, conceals or covers up any material fact, or submits any false, fictitious or fraudulent information in connection with such a proceeding, is subject to the criminal penalties set forth in 18 U.S.C. 1001.
#### § 27.1395 Maximum intensities in overlapping beams of forward and rear position lights.

No position light intensity may exceed the applicable values in the following table, except as provided in [§ 27.1389(b)(3)](/on/2024-09-19/title-14/section-27.1389#p-27.1389(b)(3)).

| Overlaps | Maximum Intensity | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Area A (candles) | Area B (candles) |
| Green in dihedral angle *L* | 10 | 1 |
| Red in dihedral angle *R* | 10 | 1 |
| Green in dihedral angle *A* | 5 | 1 |
| Red in dihedral angle *A* | 5 | 1 |
| Rear white in dihedral angle *L* | 5 | 1 |
| Rear white in dihedral angle *R* | 5 | 1 |

Where—

(a) Area A includes all directions in the adjacent dihedral angle that pass through the light source and intersect the common boundary plane at more than 10 degrees but less than 20 degrees, and

(b) Area B includes all directions in the adjacent dihedral angle that pass through the light source and intersect the common boundary plane at more than 20 degrees.
Charge 8: Lab studies of efficacy of indoor fogger products

C Design:

B Experimental unit: one cage (PVC pipe) with 10 bugs per cage

B Factors: 2 trts (treated, untreated control); 5 strains of bed bugs; 3 height locations

on wall; 4 walls

B Block: one run in a Peet-Grady chamber

B Number of blocks: 5

B Balanced incomplete block design

Bed bug strain

Run of

chamber AB C DE

1 north east south west

2 east south west north

3 south west north east

4 west north east south

5 north east south west

Table entry is wall location in the chamber. All 6

cages on a wall contain the same bed bug strain.

C Advantages of the design:

B Variation in delivery of product from run to run, variation of product within the

chamber, and other environment changes are accounted for (confounded with) by

blocks (runs of Peet-Grady chamber) and will not affect strain or height location on

wall

B Requires only 12 cages per strain per run (6 treatment, 6 control) to get 4

replications of each strain– product–wall height combination (48 total per strain)

C Analysis: Use combined inter and intra-block analysis.
§ 121.121 En route navigation facilities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no certificate holder conducting supplemental operations may conduct any operation over a route (including to any destination, refueling or alternate airports) unless suitable navigation aids are available to navigate the airplane along the route within the degree of accuracy required for ATC. Navigation aids required for routes outside of controlled airspace are listed in the certificate holder's operations specifications except for those aids required for routes to alternate airports.
( b ) Navigation aids are not required for any of the following operations— ( 1 ) Day VFR operations that the certificate holder shows can be conducted safely by pilotage because of the characteristics of the terrain;
( 2 ) Night VFR operations on routes that the certificate holder shows have reliably lighted landmarks adequate for safe operation; and
( 3 ) Other operations approved by the responsible Flight Standards office.
[Doc. No. FAA-2002-14002, 72 FR 31681, June 7, 2007, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 121-380, 83 FR 9173, Mar. 5, 2018]
**Exhibit 32.2**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2004 (the “Form 10-K”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, RobertA. Cern, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a)   the Form 10-Kfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)   the information contained in the Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial conditionand results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for,the periods presented in the Form 10-K.
| Date: March 11, 2005 |                            |   |   |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                           | /s/ ROBERT A. CERN              |   |   |
|                      | Robert A. Cern                  |   |
|                      | *Executive  Vice President and* |   |
|                      | *Chief  Financial Officer*      |   |

 

----
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1226 KA 15-00736 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
SAMUEL RIVALDO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (DANIEL GROSS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Douglas A. Randall, J.), entered March 28, 2014. The judgment revoked defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 99.4

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION.
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2003 (the Report) by CGI Group, Inc. (the Company),
the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| |  |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 16, 2004

| |                                                                                                   
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ André Imbeau
              André Imbeau
Executive Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO,

Debtor.

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-01578 (LTS)

TITLE III

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

TO THE CLERK OF COURT AND 

ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:

Pursuant to Rule 83(D)(a) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States 

District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and Bankruptcy R. 9010 (b), I am admitted or 

otherwise authorized to practice in this Court, appear in this case as counsel for National Public 

Finance Guarantee Corporation (“National”), and hereby request to be served with all motions, 

pleadings, papers and processes in this matter and to be added to any Master List to be 

maintained by the Clerk of Court.

WHEREFORE, the undersigned respectfully requests the Clerk of Court and all parties 

of record to take notice of the foregoing.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 9

th of May, 2017.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date a true and exact copy of this notice was 

filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will notify a copy to counsel of 

record.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:34 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 15:04:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

ADSUAR MUÑIZ GOYCO

SEDA & PÉREZ-OCHOA, P.S.C.

P.O. Box 70294

San Juan, PR 00936-8294

Tel: 787.756.9000

Fax: 787.756.9010

Email: acasellas@amgprlaw.com

By: /s/ Alexandra Casellas-Cabrera

Alexandra Casellas-Cabrera

USDC-PR No. 301010

Counsel for 

National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:34 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 15:04:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.4


                 Master Servicer's Sarbanes-Oxley Certification
                       (1998 Transactions - 2001 Reports)

                   BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.,
                       MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES,
                      SERIES SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT I HERETO

            I, Gary K. Bettin, a Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A.,
certify that:

1.    I have reviewed the annual reports on Form 10-K for the calendar year 2001
      and all reports on Form 8-K containing the statements to
      certificateholders set forth in Section 4.03(b) of the Pooling and
      Servicing Agreements listed on Exhibit I hereto (the "Distribution Date
      Statements") filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by
      such annual reports of the trusts (each, a "Trust") formed pursuant to
      such Pooling and Servicing Agreements;

2.    Based on my knowledge, with respect to each Trust, the information in
      these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by such
      annual report; and

3.    Based on my knowledge, the servicing information required to be provided
      to the trustee by each master servicer under each Pooling and Servicing
      Agreement for inclusion in the related Trust's Distribution Date
      Statements is included in these reports.


                                        BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
                                           as Master Servicer

                                        By:/s/ Gary K. Bettin
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Gary K. Bettin
                                           Title: Senior Vice President

<PAGE>

         PARTIES TO AGREEMENT              DATE OF AGREEMENT        SERIES
================================================================================

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    April 1, 1998               1998-1
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
of California

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    May 1, 1998                 1998-2
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
of California

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    June 1, 1998                1998-3
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    July 1, 1998                1998-4
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    September 1, 1998           1998-5
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    November 1, 1998            1998-6
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    December 1, 1998            1998-7
Inc., Bank of America, N.A., BA
Mortgage, LLC and The Bank of New York
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

#### § 21.43 Location of manufacturing facilities.

Except as provided in § 21.29, the FAA does not issue a type certificate if the manufacturing facilities for the product are located outside of the United States, unless the FAA finds that the location of the manufacturer's facilities places no undue burden on the FAA in administering applicable airworthiness requirements.
# Official Journal C 59/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.059.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 59 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5728 February 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.059.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 59

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5728 February 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 059/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2014 to 31 January 2014 (Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2014/C 059/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2014 to 31 January 2014 (Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 059/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2014 to 31 January 2014 (Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2014/C 059/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2014 to 31 January 2014 (Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

7

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN