alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.54 Fares stated in percentages of other fares; other relationships prohibited. ( a ) Fares for foreign air transportation of persons or property shall not be stated in the form of percentages, multiples, fractions, or other relationships to other fares except to the extent authorized in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section with respect to passenger fares and baggage charges.
( b ) A basis of fares for refund purposes may be stated, by rule, in the form of percentages of other fares.
( c ) Transportation rates for the portion of passengers' baggage in excess of the baggage allowance under the applicable fares may be stated, by rule, as percentages of fares.
( d ) Children's, infants' and senior citizen's fares, may be stated, by rule, as percentages of other fares published specifically in dollars and cents (hereinafter referred to as base fares): Provided, that: ( 1 ) Fares stated as percentages of base fares shall apply from and to the same points, via the same routes, and for the same class of service and same type of aircraft to which the applicable base fares apply, and shall apply to all such base fares in a fares tariff.
( 2 ) Fares shall not be stated as percentages of base fares for the purpose of establishing fares applying from and to points, or via routes, or on types of aircraft, or for classes of service different from the points, routes, types of aircraft, or classes of service to which the base fares are applicable.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2461
DAVID KEITH SUMRELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MOODY E. STALLINGS, JR.; MARY SUE TERRY, Former Attorney General; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; DIXON L. FOSTER, Honorable Judge, Retired; SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; RICHARD C. VORHIS, Assistant Bar Counsel; VIRGINIA STATE BAR; GEORGE ALLEN, Governor; OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-97-115-2) Submitted: December 16, 1997 Decided: January 20, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 David Keith Sumrell, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Edward Martin-Gayle, STALLINGS & RICHARDSON, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Grover C. Wright, Jr., Virginia Beach, Virginia; Catherine Currin Hammond, Gregory E. Lucyk, Peter Robert Messitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his petition for an order vacating his conviction. We have reviewed the record and the d istrict court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sumrell v. Stallings , No. CA-97-115-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED