alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT B

Summary of FTI Consulting, Inc. Hours Worked and Fees Incurred by Professional

Professional Position

Average 

Billing

Rate

Total

Hours

Total

Fees

Gumbs, Sean Senior Managing Director $ 1,057 214.0 $ 226,100.00 

Isler, Jeffrey Senior Managing Director 395 3.8 1,501.00 

Malloy, Michael Senior Managing Director 815 47.5 38,712.50 

Simms, Steven Senior Managing Director 1,057 25.5 26,952.50 

Tully, Conor Senior Managing Director 995 6.5 6,467.50 

Grunwald Kadar, Andrea Managing Director 915 122.3 111,904.50 

Heeren, Ana Managing Director 650 2.2 1,430.00 

Leonard, Jeffrey Managing Director 685 4.2 2,877.00 

Mulkeen, Tara Managing Director 705 97.9 69,019.50 

Park, Ji Yon Managing Director 841 187.6 157,770.00 

Robertson, David Managing Director 629 17.8 11,200.00 

Whitcomb, John Senior Director 600 10.0 6,000.00 

Mossop, Julian Senior Consultant 546 335.3 183,140.00 

Williams, Sian Senior Consultant 275 16.1 4,427.50 

Cherian, Ritika Consultant 300 253.4 76,020.00 

Emerton, Charlie Consultant 380 138.8 52,744.00 

Fazal, Kazi Consultant 455 58.0 26,390.00 

Miles, Edan Consultant 315 174.9 55,093.50 

Sombuntham, Natalie Consultant 397 179.5 71,275.00 

Hellmund-Mora, Marili Associate 266 45.0 11,977.00 

SUBTOTAL 1940.3 1,141,001.50 

Less: 50% discount for non-working travel time (13,730.00)

GRAND TOTAL 1940.3 $ 1,127,271.50 

(1): Professionals subject to annual billing rate increase effective January, 2018

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2740-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 18:44:41 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT B 

Summary of FTI Consulting, Inc. Hours Worked and Fees Incurred by Professional 

Professional Position 

Billing 

Rate 

Total 

Hours 

Total 

Fees 

Baxter, Richard Senior Managing Director $990 8.8 $8,712.00

Cannon, Biggs Senior Managing Director 675 2.9 1,957.50

Gibson, Wayne Senior Managing Director 695 4.6 3,197.00

Gumbs, Sean Senior Managing Director 1,050 158.7 166,635.00

Rodrigues, Avelino Senior Managing Director 680 4.4 2,992.00

Simms, Steven Senior Managing Director 1,050 93.9 98,595.00

Tully, Conor Senior Managing Director 995 0.5 497.50

Baldwin, Paul Managing Director 845 5.5 4,647.50

Fish, Mark Managing Director 675 2.5 1,687.50

Grunwald Kadar, Andrea Managing Director 915 42.6 38,979.00

Leonard, Jeffrey Managing Director 640 26.9 17,216.00

Park, Ji Yon Managing Director 835 191.9 160,236.50

Mossop, Julian Senior Consultant 520 129.6 67,392.00

Miles, Edan Consultant 315 101.8 32,067.00

Sombuntham, Natalie Consultant 380 158.1 60,078.00

Hellmund-Mora, Marili Associate 265 22.6 5,989.00

SUBTOTAL 955.3 670,878.50

Less: 50% discount for non-working travel time (10,447.50)

GRAND TOTAL 955.3 $660,431.00

 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2740-2 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 18:44:41 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 2 of 2
# Official Journal C 227/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 227 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5811 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 227

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5811 July 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 227/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2015/C 227/02 | Commission Decision of 10 July 2015 on the appointment of certain members of the Scientific Council of the European Research Council | 2 |
| | European Central Bank |
| 2015/C 227/03 | Indicative calendar of reserve maintenance periods in 2016 | 4 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2015/C 227/04 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 5 |
| 2015/C 227/05 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 5 |
| 2015/C 227/06 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 227/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2015/C 227/02

Commission Decision of 10 July 2015 on the appointment of certain members of the Scientific Council of the European Research Council

2

European Central Bank

2015/C 227/03

Indicative calendar of reserve maintenance periods in 2016

4

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2015/C 227/04

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

5

2015/C 227/05

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

5

2015/C 227/06

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 227/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7662 — AXA Konzern/CompuGroup Medical Mobile/DTL) (
  1
  ) | 7 |
| 2015/C 227/08 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7690 — CVC/Douglas Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 227/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7662 — AXA Konzern/CompuGroup Medical Mobile/DTL) (
  1
  )

1

7

2015/C 227/08

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7690 — CVC/Douglas Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

ser BULLETIN 1042 PLATE 9

L—~age.

—e

Hoe EXPLANATION

Phosphatic mudstone

Carbonate rock

The planimetric location of the sections is
cat the bose of the fence. To show fences
‘8 straight lines, some localities hove been
moved slightly from true positions

ze 108° age
M O N T a NU A
Dion)
ry H
rat
Lea 1 .
E
ily
Toa lH “ake FL ea
> | ee
i) ee y
24 “Pocpreto | on
qWoY;/O Mit NG
‘Montpelier® I
laze
i] *kemmerer
utp
wy H
3 Has oe
8 [sat Loke city jcoulo
z INDEX MAP
N NAMES OF LOCALITIES
=
¥ '. Fall Creek 13. Togwotee Pass
2, Bear Creek 15, Flat Creek
4, Trench D 16, Crystal Creek
5. Hungry Creek 17. Dorwin Peak
6. Teton Poss 18, Tosi Creek
9. Buck Creek 22. Sheep Mountain
10. Steer Creek 23. White Rock
Ht, Forellen Peak 24 Burroughs Creek
12. Red Creek 26 Bull Lake

rs

0 20 Miles
pal 1 J
HORIZONTAL SCALE

4 ne oe ax
L i

OF THE STRATA OF THE PHOSPHORIA FORMATION IN NORTHWESTERN WYOMING

394091 © -57 (In pocket) No. 1

FENCE DIAGRAM SHOWING A LITHOLOGIC CORRELATION
§ 1300.12 Eligible lender. ( a ) A lender eligible to receive a Federal credit instrument approved by the Board must be a non-Federal qualified institutional buyer as defined in Section 102(a)(3) of the Act.
( b ) If more than one institution participates as a lender in a single loan for which a Federal credit instrument is requested, each one of the institutions on the application must meet the requirements to be an eligible lender. An application for a guarantee of a single loan, for which there is more than one lender, must identify one of the institutions to act as agent for all. This agent is responsible for administering the loan and shall have those duties and responsibilities required of an agent, as set forth in the guarantee.
( c ) Each lender, irrespective of any indemnities or other agreements between the lenders and the agent, shall be bound by all actions, and/or failures to act, of the agent. The Board shall be entitled to rely upon such actions and/or failures to act of the agent as binding the lenders.
( d ) Status as an eligible lender under this section does not assure that the Board will issue the guarantee sought, or otherwise preclude the Board from declining to issue a guarantee.
#### John Merritt, as Executor and Trustee Under the Will of Hannah B. Merritt, Deceased, Plaintiff, *v.*George Merritt, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Kings Special Term for Trials,

December, 1900.)

Principal and agent — Complaint for an accounting by an agent who had been discharged as executor of the principal.

A complaint by the executor and trustee of a decedent against a co-executor, who had been permitted to resign after accounting as such before the surrogate, which alleges that the defendant, although long the agent of the decedent to collect her rents and income and ■invest the proceeds, had never accounted, is sufficient even though it does not allege that the defendant is still indebted as agent.

The accounting of the defendant as executor is no bar to the action.

Action for an accounting. The defendant, had the possession and management of all of the personal and real property of the deceased for a period of 22 years up to the time of her death, under á written power of attorney by her to him, empowering him to collect the rents and income thereof, and also to sell the same and invest the proceeds. The defendant was co-executor under the will of the deceased with the plaintiff, but upon his petition he was permitted to resign as such by the Surrogate, he having first filed his account as such executor and had the same settled.

De Borden Wilmot for plaintiff.

Delos McCurdy for defendant.

*231Gaynor, J.:

The point is made that the complaint is insufficient to require the defendant to account. It alleges only that the defendant did not account to the deceased, and has not accounted since her death. It is claimed that it should go further, and have allegations showing that the defendant still has property of the deceased, or was indebted to her at the time of her death for money received in his fiduciary relation to her. The complaint is sufficient. It alleges the fiduciary relation, and that the defendant has never accounted; and the proof sustains this. The existence of the fiduciary relation suffices to require an accounting, for part of the fiduciary duties is to account; and the burden is therefore on the defendant to show that his trust duties have been fully performed, and not on the plaintiff to prove the negative; and this he can do by showing that he has accounted, or else by now accounting (Marvin v. Brooks, 94 N. Y. 71; Frethey v. Durant, 24 App. Div. 58).

The claim that the accounting of the defendant to the Surrogate on his resignation as executor included the accounting now asked for, and is therefore a bar to this suit, seems to be unfounded. That it did not actually include it is apparent from an inspection of the account there. That it must have included it in legal contemplation, or, in other words, that such an accounting was necessarily embraced within the issues of that proceeding, and could and should have been decided therein (as in Barber v. Kendall, 158 N. Y. 401), is not the case. That accounting could legally involve the doings of the defendant as executor only.

Interlocutory judgment for an accounting.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DOMINIQUE S. ALLEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1653

[October 14, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 312012CF001548A.

Dominique S. Allen, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., MAY, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ. concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21753-1 Filed:08/05/22 Entered:08/05/22 19:09:43 Desc:Exhibit A - Declaration of Jose Chaves Ortiz in Support of Response Page 1 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21753-1 Filed:08/05/22 Entered:08/05/22 19:09:43 Desc:Exhibit A - Declaration of Jose Chaves Ortiz in Support of Response Page 2 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21753-1 Filed:08/05/22 Entered:08/05/22 19:09:43 Desc:Exhibit A - Declaration of Jose Chaves Ortiz in Support of Response Page 3 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21753-1 Filed:08/05/22 Entered:08/05/22 19:09:43 Desc:Exhibit A - Declaration of Jose Chaves Ortiz in Support of Response Page 4 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21753-1 Filed:08/05/22 Entered:08/05/22 19:09:43 Desc:Exhibit A - Declaration of Jose Chaves Ortiz in Support of Response Page 5 of 5
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3637 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3637

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide a temporary increase 
  in the minimum end strength level for active duty personnel for the 
                     Army, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2003

  Mrs. Tauscher (for herself, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Cooper, and Mr. George 
Miller of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide a temporary increase 
  in the minimum end strength level for active duty personnel for the 
                     Army, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN THE MINIMUM END STRENGTH LEVEL FOR THE 
              ARMY.

    (a) Five-Year Increase.--Section 691 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Notwithstanding subsection (b)(1), at the end of each of the 
fiscal years 2004 through 2008, the number of members of the Army on 
active duty shall be not less than 522,400.''.
    (b) Conforming Increase in Fiscal Year 2004 End Strength.--Section 
401(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 
is amended by striking ``482,400'' and inserting ``522,400''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 217.8 Reporting procedures.

Reporting guidelines and procedures for Schedule T-100(f) are prescribed in appendix A of this part.

[53 FR 46294, Nov. 16, 1988, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15926, Apr. 16, 2019]
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of QuadTech International, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roland
      Vetter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      QuadTech International,, Inc. and will be retained by QuadTech International,,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.








*February
                9, 2007*
              
              */s/
                J. Roland Vetter*
              
              *J.
                Roland Vetter*
              *Chief
                Financial Officer*
pet.

Office ofthe Secretary

PO Box 94245 | Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245

ph: 225-379-1200 | fe; 225-379-1851

Bobby Jindal, Governor

Sherri H. LeBas, P.E., Secretary LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORrATION « DEVELOPMENT

Mr. Randall Fiertz, Director

Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis (AGO)

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Ave SW

Washington, D.C. 20591

RE; Louisiana DOTD Aviation Taxation Information 

Dear Mr. Fiertz,

The State of Louisiana has a dedicated Aviation Trust Fund (ATF) within the Transportation 

Trust Fund. The revenue deposited into the ATF is derived from a 4% sales tax on Aviation 

Gasoline and Jet Fuel sold in the state. The Louisiana Constitution provides for Transportation 

Trust Fund monies derived from the sale of aviation fuel (which equates to the ATF) for the 

construction and maintenance of airports.

Louisiana Revised Statutes (LRS), Title 2 state: Aeronautics allows for the creation of the 

Airport Construction and Development Priority Program (LRS 2:801 et. seq.). The law also

provides that the “Department” (LA-DOTD) create procedures and rules for review and 

evaluation of applications in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act and approved 

by legislative committee. Louisiana Administrative Code, Title 70 is the location ofthese rules 

to be followed when evaluating airport submitted projects.

Total funds derived from the 4% sales tax is $29.7 Million ofwhich $1.3 million is used for the 

operating budget of the Aviation Section of LA-DOTD to administer the Airport Construction 

and Development Priority Program. The remaining $28.4 Million ofthe funds are used for the

Airport Construction and Development Priority Program and under current rule oflaw, must be

split between air carrier airport projects and general aviation airport projects at a 65% - 35% ratio

respectively. These funds are to be used to fund the 10% match to Federal Projects (FAA) as

well as some 100% state-only projects. By way of example, please note that the most recently 

legislatively approved aviation program may be found on our website at the following link 

http://wwwsp.dotd.la.gov/Inside LaDOTD/Divisions/Multimodal/Aviation/Pages/Construction

Develonment.aspx.

Should you need further information regarding Louisiana aviation funding information, please 

feel free to contact me at (225) 379-3040 or brad.brandt@la.gov.

Aviation Director

Louisiana Department ofTransportation & Development | 1201 Capitol Access Road | Baton Rouge, LA 70802 | 225-379-1200

Sincerely,

An Equal Opportunity Employer | A Drug-Free Workplace | AgencyofLouisiana.gov | dotd.la.gov
#### § 137.23 Carriage of narcotic drugs, marihuana, and depressant or stimulant drugs or substances.

If the holder of a certificate issued under this part permits any aircraft owned or leased by that holder to be engaged in any operation that the certificate holder knows to be in violation of § 91.19(a) of this chapter, that operation is a basis for suspending or revoking the certificate.

[Doc. No. 12035, 38 FR 17493, July 2, 1973, as amended by Amdt. 137-12, 54 FR 34332, Aug. 18, 1989]
§ 121.436 Pilot Qualification: Certificates and experience requirements. ( a ) No certificate holder may use nor may any pilot act as pilot in command of an aircraft (or as second in command of an aircraft in a flag or supplemental operation that requires three or more pilots) unless the pilot: ( 1 ) Holds an airline transport pilot certificate not subject to the limitations in § 61.167 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Holds an appropriate aircraft type rating for the aircraft being flown; and
( 3 ) If serving as pilot in command in part 121 operations, has 1,000 hours as: ( i ) Second in command in operations under this part;
( ii ) Pilot in command in operations under § 91.1053(a)(2)(i) of this chapter;
( iii ) Pilot in command in operations under § 135.243(a)(1) of this chapter;
( iv ) Pilot in command in eligible on-demand operations that require the pilot to satisfy § 135.4(a)(2)(ii)(A) of this chapter; or
( v ) Any combination thereof.
( b ) No certificate holder may use nor may any pilot act as second in command unless the pilot holds an airline transport pilot certificate and an appropriate aircraft type rating for the aircraft being flown. A second-in-command type rating obtained under § 61.55 does not satisfy the requirements of this section.
( c ) For the purpose of satisfying the flight hour requirement in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, a pilot may credit 500 hours of military flight time provided the flight time was obtained— ( 1 ) As pilot in command in a multiengine, turbine-powered, fixed-wing airplane or powered-lift aircraft, or any combination thereof; and
( 2 ) In an operation requiring more than one pilot.
( d ) For the purpose of satisfying the flight hour requirement in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, a pilot may credit flight time obtained as pilot in command in operations under this part prior to July 31, 2013.
( e ) For those pilots who were employed as pilot in command in part 121 operations on July 31, 2013, compliance with the requirements of paragraph (a)(3) of this section is not required.
[Doc. No. FAA-2010-0100, 78 FR 42378, July 15, 2013, as amended by Amdt. 121-365A, 78 FR 77574, Dec. 24, 2013; Amdt. 121-385, 87 FR 57590, Sept. 21, 2022]
§ 141.63 Examining authority qualification requirements. ( a ) A pilot school must meet the following prerequisites to receive initial approval for examining authority: ( 1 ) The school must complete the application for examining authority on a form and in a manner prescribed by the Administrator;
( 2 ) The school must hold a pilot school certificate and rating issued under this part;
( 3 ) The school must have held the rating in which examining authority is sought for at least 24 consecutive calendar months preceding the month of application for examining authority;
( 4 ) The training course for which examining authority is requested may not be a course that is approved without meeting the minimum ground and flight training time requirements of this part; and
( 5 ) Within 24 calendar months before the date of application for examining authority, that school must meet the following requirements— ( i ) The school must have trained at least 10 students in the training course for which examining authority is sought and recommended those students for a pilot, flight instructor, or ground instructor certificate or rating; and
( ii ) At least 90 percent of those students passed the required practical or knowledge test, or any combination thereof, for the pilot, flight instructor, or ground instructor certificate or rating on the first attempt, and that test was given by— ( A ) An FAA inspector; or
( B ) An examiner who is not an employee of the school.
( b ) A pilot school must meet the following requirements to retain approval of its examining authority: ( 1 ) The school must complete the application for renewal of its examining authority on a form and in a manner prescribed by the Administrator;
( 2 ) The school must hold a pilot school certificate and rating issued under this part;
( 3 ) The school must have held the rating for which continued examining authority is sought for at least 24 calendar months preceding the month of application for renewal of its examining authority; and
( 4 ) The training course for which continued examining authority is requested may not be a course that is approved without meeting the minimum ground and flight training time requirements of this part.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16347, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 141-9, 62 FR 40908, July 30, 1997]