alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEP ARTMENT OF THE AI R FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR FOR CE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY

23 Jun 14

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/AGC

- 10

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3O F

6500 S. MacArthur Blvd Bldg 4, Rm 240 Oklahoma City, OK 731 6 9

SUBJECT: 14 CFR Exemption 4371 Renewal (Regulatory Docket FAA

- 2000

- 8093)

1. FAA Exemption 4371 was granted to the United States Air Force on 21 Jun 85; as amended

to 4371 M on 19 April 20 1 3 , it exempts USAF aircraft from the provisions of Title 14, Code of Federal Regualtions § 91.177(a)(2) and 91.179(b)(1)

. T he requirement s have chang ed for USAF

aircraft to conduct low

- level operations without complying with en route minimum altitudes for flight under instrument flight rules (IFR) or direction of flight requirements for IFR en route segments in uncontrolled airspace.

2. Due to techn ological advances in aircraft systems

, as well as current and future operational requirements , the Air Force has the need to train aircrew and employ aircraft and systems at
altitudes lower than granted in the current exemption

. Additionally, the maximum route length imposed by 4371M diminishes the effectiveness of the t raining

. The Air Force req uests the following ammendments to 4371M :

a. Fixed

- Wing Aircraft (item 1 of 4371M) : i. M inimum al titude for fixed

- wing aircraft employing Terrain Following/Terrain

Avoidance (TF/TA) ra dar procedures will be no lower than 200 feet above ground

l evel (AGL)

. ii. M inimum altitude for fixed

- wing aircraft employing visual low level procedures

will be no lower tha n 200 feet and short duration threat penetration legs no lower

than 100 feet

. b. Rotary

- wing and Tilt

- rotor aircraft (item 1 of 4371M) : i. M inimum al titude for rotary

- wing and tilt

- rotor aircraft employing TF/TA ra dar procedures will be no lower than 1 00 feet AGL

. ii. M inimum altitude for rotary

- wing and tilt

- rotor aircraft employing visual low level procedures will be no lower tha n 5 0 feet AGL.

c. D eletion of the 40 nautical mile maximum route length requirement (item 6 of 4371M) ;

3. On behalf of the USAF, we hereby re quest a modification to 4371 IAW 14 CFR Part 11 until 30 April 201 7

. Without this approval, USAF aircrews will be unable to adequately train for the

combat environment. The conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety presented in the origi nal and subsequent petitions (upon which the exemption was granted) remain unchanged.GLOBAL ACCESS FOR AMERICA

4

. Please contact me at ( 405 ) 734

- 5794 or by email at clint.palmer @us.af.mil or hqaffsa.x of@us.af.mil if there are any questions o r concerns

. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

CLINT T. PALMER

, Maj , USAF Chief, Flight Directives Division
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:

      -     the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
            and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
            and

      -     the information contained in the report fairly presents, on all
            material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
            operations.

/s/ Kevin A. Schmidt
Kevin A. Schmidt, Principal Financial Officer

Dated: May 12. 2004

                                       27
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 2, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25439-25440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 00-ACE-3]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Cuba, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Cuba, MO.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 65 FR 9998 is effective on 
0901 UTC, June 15, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with request for comments in the Federal Register on February 25, 2000 
(65 FR 9998). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
on adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent of submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on June 15, 2000. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.


[[Page 25440]]


    Issued in Kansas City, MO on April 14, 2000.
Richard L. Day,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 00-10850 Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:24847-5   Filed:08/04/23   Entered:08/04/23 14:34:55    Desc:Exhibit E   Page 1 of 1
§ 17.5 Delegation of authority. ( a ) The authority of the Administrator to conduct dispute resolution and adjudicative proceedings concerning acquisition matters is delegated to the Director of the ODRA.
( b ) The Director of the ODRA may redelegate to Special Masters and DROs such delegated authority in paragraph (a) of this section as deemed necessary by the Director for efficient resolution of an assigned protest or contract dispute, including the imposition of sanctions for the filing of frivolous pleadings, making false statements, or other disciplinary actions. See subpart F of this part.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UltraStrip Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to his knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Stephen R. Johnson
-------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/  Michael R. Johnson
------------------------------
Senior Vice President - Operations (Treasurer)
§ 13.47 Withdrawal or amendment of the complaint, answer, or other filings. ( a ) *Withdrawal.* At any time before the hearing, the complainant may withdraw the complaint, and the respondent may withdraw the request for hearing.
( b ) *Amendments.* At any time more than 10 days before the date of hearing, any party may amend its complaint, answer, or other pleading, by filing the amendment with the FAA Hearing Docket and serving a copy of it on every other party. After that time, amendment requires approval of the hearing officer. If an initial pleading is amended, the hearing officer must allow the other parties a reasonable opportunity to respond.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0702 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-181-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
# Official Journal L 213/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 213 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6017 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 213

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6017 August 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1443 of 29 June 2017 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regards to supervisory reporting of institutions according to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1443 of 29 June 2017 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regards to supervisory reporting of institutions according to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 125.297 Approval of flight simulators and flight training devices. ( a ) Flight simulators and flight training devices approved by the Administrator may be used in training, testing, and checking required by this subpart.
( b ) Each flight simulator and flight training device that is used in training, testing, and checking required under this subpart must be used in accordance with an approved training course conducted by a training center certificated under part 142 of this chapter, or meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) It must be specifically approved for— ( i ) The certificate holder;
( ii ) The type airplane and, if applicable, the particular variation within type for which the check is being conducted; and
( iii ) The particular maneuver, procedure, or crewmember function involved.
( 2 ) It must maintain the performance, functional, and other characteristics that are required for approval.
( 3 ) It must be modified to conform with any modification to the airplane being simulated that changes the performance, functional, or other characteristics required for approval.
[Doc. No. 19779, 45 FR 67235, Oct. 9, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 125-27, 61 FR 34561, July 2, 1996]
§ 23.2525 System power generation, storage, and distribution. The power generation, storage, and distribution for any system must be designed and installed to— ( a ) Supply the power required for operation of connected loads during all intended operating conditions;
( b ) Ensure no single failure or malfunction of any one power supply, distribution system, or other utilization system will prevent the system from supplying the essential loads required for continued safe flight and landing; and
( c ) Have enough capacity, if the primary source fails, to supply essential loads, including non-continuous essential loads for the time needed to complete the function required for continued safe flight and landing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.11 Agent.

An agent may issue and file, in his or its own name, tariff publications naming local fares and/or joint fares, and provisions governing such fares, and rules and regulations governing foreign air transportation to the extent provided by this part and/or Department order, for account of carriers participating in such tariff publications, under authority of their powers of attorney given to such issuing agent as provided in § 221.150. The issuing agent shall file such tariff publications with the Department on behalf of all carriers participating therein. Only one issuing agent may act in issuing and filing each such tariff publication.
Transport Airplane Directorate

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W.

Renton, Washington 98057-3356

May 16, 2013

Mr. Robert Wagner

Vice President

Plane Antenna and Security Systems

402 Park Place Drive

Hewitt, Texas 76643

Dear Mr. Wagner:

We received your April 5, 2013 petition for exemption from the requirements of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.571(e)(1), for Boeing Model 737-900 airplanes.

The exemption would grant a 12 month exemption for the bird strike requirement of 

§ 25.571(e)(1) to ensure that Plane Antenna and Security Systems has time to design, 

fabricate, and install a net that will secure any large debris from hitting the empennage, or 

comply by some other means.

This request, which you submitted to the Department of Transportation’s Federal Docket 

Management System (FDMS), has been given Docket No. FAA-2013-0433. We are 

reviewing your request and will contact you if we need additional information.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Todd Martin, ANM-115 at 425-227-1178 or e-mail Todd.Martin@faa.gov.

Sincerely, 

Michael Menkin

Transport Airplane Directorate

Aircraft Certification Service
STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE NO. 2023 KW 1215

INTEREST OF D. M. 

JANUARY 18, 2024

In Re: D. M., applying for supervisory writs, City Court of

East St. Tammany, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 23JP1021. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C. J., CHUTZ AND LANIER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

JMG

WRC

WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY C ERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN RE:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.,

Debtor

PROMESA Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

IN RE:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as representative of

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER 

AUTHORITY

Debtor.

PROMESA Title III

No. 17 BK 4780-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR SERVICE 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 83D(a) of the Local Civil Rules of the 

United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, Rules 2002, 9007 and 9010(b) of the 

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), made applicable to these 

proceedings by Section 310 of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability 

Act (“PROMESA”), 48 U.S.C. § 2170, and sections 102(1) and 1109(b) of title 11 of the United 

States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), made applicable to these proceedings by Section 301 of 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24473 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/08/23 17:20:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2

PROMESA, attorney Laura B. Arroyo hereby appears in representation along with legal counsel 

William Santiago in the above-captioned Title III cases (the “Title III Cases”) on behalf of Comité 

Diálogo Ambiental, Inc., El Puente de Williamsburg, Inc.-Enlace de Acción Climática, Comité 

Yabucoeño Pro-Calidad de Vida, Inc., Alianza Comunitaria Ambientalista del Sureste, Inc., Sierra 

Club Puerto Rico, Inc., Mayagüezanos por la Salud y el Ambiente, Inc., Coalición de 

Organizaciones Anti Incineración, Inc., and Amigos del Río Guaynabo, Inc., parties-in-interest in 

the Title III Cases.

Therefore, the undersigned counsel requests that all notices and all papers in the abovementioned proceedings be served to said counsel in addition to the other counsel of record and be 

added to the mailing list maintained by the Clerk:

Laura B. Arroyo

USDC PR NO. 228312

Earthjustice

4500 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 201

Miami, FL 33160

T: 305-440-5436

F: 850-681-0020

larroyo@earthjustice.org

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested from this Honorable Court to take notice of the 

above for all relevant purposes.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, on this same date, I filed this document electronically with 

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all 

parties of record and CM/ECF participants in this case. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 8th day of June 2023.

/s/Laura Arroyo

Laura B. Arroyo

USDC PR NO. 228312

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24473 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/08/23 17:20:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
3

Earthjustice

4500 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 201

Miami, FL 33160 

T: 305-440-5436

F: 850-681-0020

larroyo@earthjustice.org

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24473 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/08/23 17:20:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799-3 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/09/22 17:04:16 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799-3 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/09/22 17:04:16 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799-3 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/09/22 17:04:16 Desc:

Exhibit Page 3 of 3
S. 4126 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 104 East 

Main Street in Port Washington, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Joseph G. Demler Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOSEPH G. DEMLER POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 104 East Main Street in Port Washington, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Joseph G. Demler 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Joseph G. Demler Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24893 Filed:08/14/23 Entered:08/15/23 17:55:46 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 23-1131

___________________________ 

Kaleb Leon Gilpin

 Petitioner - Appellant

v.

United States of America

 Respondent - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Central

____________ 

Submitted: April 18, 2024

Filed: May 2, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before GRUENDER, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

In September 2021, Kaleb Gilpin pleaded guilty to two counts of being a user 

of a controlled substance in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). The

district court1 sentenced Gilpin to 32 months’ imprisonment on each count, to be 

1

The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the 

Western District of Missouri.
-2- 

served concurrently, followed by a 3-year term of supervised release. In June 2022, 

the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 

U.S. 1 (2022). The Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual 

right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home. Id. at 10. After the Court 

issued its decision in Bruen, Gilpin filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his 

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argued that his conviction violated the 

Second Amendment and that his counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the 

constitutionality of § 922(g)(3). The district court denied Gilpin’s motion.

We granted a certificate of appealability solely on the issue of whether 

Gilpin’s conviction violates the Second Amendment in light of Bruen. See id.

§ 2253(c). In § 2255 proceedings, we review a district court’s conclusions on issues 

of law de novo. United States v. Duke, 50 F.3d 571, 576 (8th Cir. 1995). The 

constitutionality of § 922(g)(3) is a legal question subject to de novo review. See id.

Due to our decision in United States v. Veasley, --- F.4th ----, 2024 WL 

1649267 (8th Cir. Apr. 17, 2024), we discern no error by the district court.2

 In 

Veasley, which was decided after Bruen, we rejected the defendant’s facial challenge 

to § 922(g)(3) under the Second Amendment. Id. at *9. We held that, for purposes 

of a facial challenge, § 922(g)(3) fits within the historical tradition of firearm 

regulation. Id. Therefore, we reject Gilpin’s facial challenge as foreclosed by 

Veasley. 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. 

______________________________

2

This case was originally set for oral argument on December 12, 2023. In 

November 2023, we granted the Government’s unopposed motion to stay the case 

pending this court’s decision in Veasley. An opinion and judgment in Veasley were 

filed on April 17, 2024.
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-78248, and 33-78250) of Signal Technology Corporation of
our report dated February 13, 2001, except as to Note 9 which is as of
February 27, 2001 and Note 10 which is as of March 7, 2001 relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2001
#### § 147.31 Early testing.

When a student satisfactorily completes the general portion of a certificated aviation maintenance technician school's curriculum, the school may issue an authenticated document that demonstrates the student's preparedness to take the mechanic general written test in accordance with § 65.75(c) of this chapter.