alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In-Person Attendees: Test Procedures for Showerheads, Faucets, Water closets, Urinals and Commercial Prerinse Spray Valves

Meeting Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Email

Adin, Lucas M. Energy Technology 

Program Specialist

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue SW

Washington DC 20585 202-287-1317 202-586-4617 lucas.adin@ee.doe.gov

Barhydt, Laura L. Deputy General 

Counsel for Litigation

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue SW

Washington DC 20585 202-287-5772 N/A Laura.Barhydt@hq.doe.gov

Hansen, Dain M. Director

Government Relations

International Association of 

Plumbing and Mechanical Officials 

(IAPMO)

101 Constitution Avenue 

NW

Suite L110

Washington DC 20001 202-414-6177 202-289-3792 dain.hansen@iapmo.org

Heine, Kristine Executive Vice 

President

Global Communicators. LLC 1875 I Street, NW, Suite 

500

Washington DC 20006 202-371-9800 703-620-0130 kheine@globalcommunicators.com

Levy, Amanda F. Environmental Analyst ERG 2300 Wilson Boulevard, 

Suite 350

Arlington VA 22201 703-373-8109 703-841-1440 amanda.levy@erg.com

Mauer, Joanna Technical Advocacy 

Coordinator

Appliance Standards Awareness 

Project (ASAP)

529 14th Street NW,

Suite 600

Washington DC 20045 202-507-4034 N/A jmauer@appliance-standards.org

Salmon, Stephanie M. N/A Artemins Strategies 10 G Street, NE, Suite 601 Washington DC 20002 202-783-1080 202-283-1081 ssalmon@artemisdc.com

Slamon, Stephanie M. Vice President Artemis Strategies 10 G Street, NE, Suite 601 Washington DC 20002 202-783-1080 202-783-1081 ssalmon@artemisdc.com

Swatkowski, Len Technical Director Plumbing Manufacturers Intl 1921 Rohlwing Rd - Unit G Rolling 

Meadows

IL 60008 N/A N/A lswatkowski@pmihome.org

Tiedeman, Jennifer General Counsel U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-287-6111 N/A jennifer.tiedeman@hq.doe.gov
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00037

- CR

Willie Earl HAYWOOD

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 456th District Court

, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20

- 0970

- CR

- A

Honorable Heather H. Wright , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is MODIFIED to delete the assessment of court appointed attorney’s fees agai nst appellant Willie Earl Haywood, and the judgment is AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. The trial court clerk is ORDERED to prepare and file in this case a corrected bill of costs showing that no court appointed attorney’s fees are assessed against Haywood. Counsel ’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

SIGNED September 21, 2022.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32
SATELLITE ENTERPRISES CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT 20 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Satellite Enterprises Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB For the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission o the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve
Mannen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 905 of the Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                       By: /s/ Steve Mannen
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Steve Mannen
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President


<PAGE>

SATELLITE ENTERPRISES CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT 20 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Satellite Enterprises Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB For the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission o the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, Niels
Reijers, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 905 of the Sarbanes
-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        By: /s/ Niels Reijers
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Niels Reijers
                                            Chief Financial Officer
#### Edward Morgan *vs.*The Ryan-Unmack Company.

Third Judicial District.

Argued October 26th

decided December 17th, 1915.

Action to récover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before *Gager, J.;*the court, upon motion of the defendant, directed a verdict in its favor, from the judgment upon which the plaintiff appealed.

*No error.*

*Benjamin Slade*and *Harry L. Edlin,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Seymour C. Loomis,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The verdict against the plaintiff was directed upon the ground that his own evidence showed that his injuries were caused by the negligence of his fellow-servant.

It appears that the plaintiff was an employee of the defendant as rigger or derrick-rigger, among his duties being that of moving and putting up derricks, putting up machinery, and general work. He was ordered to move a derrick a few feet from where it was then placed, and to do this it was necessary to remove two concrete blocks. He, with one of two men who were helpers or made up his gang, went .to the derrick to move *713it, calling upon one Miller, another employee of the defendant and its “boss carpenter,” and telling him he must move the blocks. The blocks were to be moved by means of a derrick standing near by. The three men tackeled on to one of the blocks, and a signal was given by Miller to the engineer, who operated a steam engine connected with the derrick, to haul away. The block was drawn up so rapidly that it threw itself out of the dogs by which it was raised and fell upon the plaintiff. The plaintiff called upon Miller at the suggestion of one Nord, who had no authority to order the boss-carpenter to move or assist in moving the block.

The three men acted together and were fellow-servants in moving the block, and if, as the plaintiff’s counsel claim, Miller was negligent in ordering the block to be raised rapidly, that negligence was the negligence of a fellow-servant, as the Superior Court held, and the verdict for the defendant was therefore properly directed.

There is no error.
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.30 Passenger fares and charges. ( a ) Fares tariffs, including associated data, shall be filed electronically in conformity with subpart R. Associated data includes arbitraries, footnotes, routing numbers and fare class explanations. See § 221.202(b)(8).
( b ) Upon application by a carrier, the Department's Office of International Aviation shall have the authority to waive the electronic filing requirement in this paragraph and in Subpart R in whole or in part, for a period up to one year, and to permit, under such terms and conditions as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this part, the applicant carrier to file fare tariffs in a paper format. Such waivers shall only be considered where electronic filing, compared to paper filing, is impractical and will produce a significant economic hardship for the carrier due to the limited nature of the carrier's operations subject to the requirements of this part, or other unusual circumstances. Paper filings pursuant to this paragraph shall normally conform to the requirements of § 221.195 and other applicable requirements of this part.
#### TALLASSEE FALLS MFG. CO. v. THE STATE.

(Decided July 19, 1915.)

Appeal from Elmore Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

J. M. Ci-iilton, for appellant. H. R. Golson, and Hill, Hill, Whiting & Stern, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on authority of *Ex parte State of Alabama, in re Tallassee Falls Mfg. Co.,*194 Ala., 69 South. 589.
EXHIBIT 10.44




 




Schedule C




Amendment to the

Split Dollar Agreement and Policy Endorsement with Central Valley Community

Bank




 




 




Participants and life insurance

policies in Central Valley Community Bank Amendment to the Split Dollar

Agreement and Policy Endorsement




 




	

  Participant


  	

   


  	

  Dates of

  signature


  	

   


  	

  Old Policy

  


  Jefferson Pilot Life


  	

   


  	

  New Policy


  Jefferson Pilot Life


  	

   


  
	

  Daniel N. Cunningham


  	

   


  	

  January 3, 2003


  	

   


  	

  0008672841


  	

   


  	

  JP5234733


  	

   


  
	

  Steven McDonald


  	

   


  	

  January 3, 2003


  	

   


  	

  0008672854


  	

   


  	

  JP5234736


  	

   


  
	

  Louis McMurray


  	

   


  	

  January 3, 2003


  	

   


  	

  N/A


  	

   


  	

  N/A


  	

   


  
	

  Wanda Lee Rogers


  	

   


  	

  January 3, 2003


  	

   


  	

  N/A


  	

   


  	

  N/A


  	

   


  
	

  William S. Smittcamp


  	

   


  	

  January 3, 2003


  	

   


  	

  N/A


  	

   


  	

  N/A
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24366-2 Filed:05/30/23 Entered:05/30/23 17:25:22 Desc:

Exhibit Ex. B - Party Exhibit Cover Sheet Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24366-2 Filed:05/30/23 Entered:05/30/23 17:25:22 Desc:

Exhibit Ex. B - Party Exhibit Cover Sheet Page 2 of 2
§ 161.1 Purpose. This part implements the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (49 U.S.C. App. 2153, 2154, 2155, and 2156). It prescribes: ( a ) Notice requirements and procedures for airport operators implementing Stage 3 aircraft noise and access restrictions pursuant to agreements between airport operators and aircraft operators;
( b ) Analysis and notice requirements for airport operators proposing Stage 2 aircraft noise and access restrictions;
( c ) Notice, review, and approval requirements for airport operators proposing Stage 3 aircraft noise and access restrictions; and
( d ) Procedures for Federal Aviation Administration reevaluation of agreements containing restrictions on Stage 3 aircraft operations and of aircraft noise and access restrictions affecting Stage 3 aircraft operations imposed by airport operators.
§ 151.31 Procedures: Grant agreement. ( a ) An offer by the Administrator, and acceptance by the sponsor, as set forth in § 151.29, constitute a grant agreement between the sponsor and the United States. Except as provided in § 151.41(c)(3), the United States does not pay, and is not obligated to pay, any part of the project costs that have been or may be incurred, before the grant agreement is executed.
( b ) The Administrator and the sponsor may agree to a change in a grant agreement if— ( 1 ) The change does not increase the maximum obligation of the United States under the grant agreement by more than 10 percent;
( 2 ) The change provides only for airport development that meets the requirements of subparts B and C; and
( 3 ) The change does not prejudice the interests of the United States.
( c ) When a change is agreed to, the Administrator issues a supplemental agreement incorporating the change. The sponsor must accept the supplemental agreement in the manner provided in § 151.29(c).
[Doc. No. 1329, 27 FR 12351, Dec. 13, 1962, as amended by Amdt. 151-8, 30 FR 8040, June 23, 1965]
§ 107.77 Change of name or address. ( a ) *Change of name.* An application to change the name on a certificate issued under this subpart must be accompanied by the applicant's: ( 1 ) Remote pilot certificate with small UAS rating; and
( 2 ) A copy of the marriage license, court order, or other document verifying the name change.
( b ) The documents in paragraph (a) of this section will be returned to the applicant after inspection.
( c ) *Change of address.* The holder of a remote pilot certificate with small UAS rating issued under this subpart who has made a change in permanent mailing address may not, after 30 days from that date, exercise the privileges of the certificate unless the holder has notified the FAA of the change in address using one of the following methods: ( 1 ) By letter to the FAA Airman Certification Branch, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125 providing the new permanent mailing address, or if the permanent mailing address includes a post office box number, then the holder's current residential address; or
( 2 ) By using the FAA Web site portal at *www.faa.gov* providing the new permanent mailing address, or if the permanent mailing address includes a post office box number, then the holder's current residential address.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Jeffrey L. Dykes as the true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent of the undersigned, with full power of substitution
and re-substitution, for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, in
any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective
amendments, exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith) to
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, and
to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection
therewith as fully as to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or
could do in person, thereby ratifying and confirming all said attorney-in-fact
and agent or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
thereof.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Power of Attorney has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and
on the date indicated.

        Signature                       Title                       Date
        ---------                       -----                       ----

   /s/ J. Thomas McGrath        President, Chief Executive      March 29, 2001
-----------------------------   Officer and Director
   J. Thomas McGrath            (Principal Executive Officer)

   /s/ Steve D. Butler          Chief Financial Officer         March 29, 2001
-----------------------------   (Principal Financial and
   Steve Butler                 Accounting Officer)


   /s/ Donald L. Sturm          Chairman of the Board           March 29, 2001
-----------------------------
   Donald L. Sturm

   /s/ Kevin C. McTavish        Director                        March 29, 2001
-----------------------------
   Kevin C. McTavish

   /s/ William S. Price III     Director                        March 29, 2001
-----------------------------
   William S. Price III

   /s/ James O. Spitzenberger   Director                        March 29, 2001
-----------------------------
   James O. Spitzenberger

   /s/ John C. Stiska           Director                        March 29, 2001
-----------------------------
   John C. Stiska

   /s/ Melanie L. Sturm         Director                        March 29, 2001
-----------------------------
   Melanie L. Sturm

   /s/ John G. Donoghue         Director                        March 29, 2001
-----------------------------
   John G. Donoghue
#### PRIDGIN v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 8, 1915.)

Appeal from Anniston City Court.

Heard before Hon. Thomas W. Coleman, Jr.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and W. H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

Appeal dismissed on authority of *Rivers v. State, infra,*69 South. 387.
§ 25.787 Stowage compartments. ( a ) Each compartment for the stowage of cargo, baggage, carry-on articles, and equipment (such as life rafts), and any other stowage compartment, must be designed for its placarded maximum weight of contents and for the critical load distribution at the appropriate maximum load factors corresponding to the specified flight and ground load conditions, and to those emergency landing conditions of § 25.561(b)(3) for which the breaking loose of the contents of such compartments in the specified direction could— ( 1 ) Cause direct injury to occupants;
( 2 ) Penetrate fuel tanks or lines or cause fire or explosion hazard by damage to adjacent systems; or
( 3 ) Nullify any of the escape facilities provided for use after an emergency landing. If the airplane has a passenger-seating configuration, excluding pilot seats, of 10 seats or more, each stowage compartment in the passenger cabin, except for under seat and overhead compartments for passenger convenience, must be completely enclosed.
( b ) There must be a means to prevent the contents in the compartments from becoming a hazard by shifting, under the loads specified in paragraph (a) of this section. For stowage compartments in the passenger and crew cabin, if the means used is a latched door, the design must take into consideration the wear and deterioration expected in service.
( c ) If cargo compartment lamps are installed, each lamp must be installed so as to prevent contact between lamp bulb and cargo.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-32, 37 FR 3969, Feb. 24, 1972; Amdt. 25-38, 41 FR 55466, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 25-51, 45 FR 7755, Feb. 4, 1980; Amdt. 25-139, 79 FR 59430, Oct. 2, 2014]
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1042 PLATE 2

FEET PERCENT P,0, THICK- AVERAGE DESCRIPTION
NESS IN P.O, IN
30 20 10 FEET PERCENT
° REX CHERT MEMBER (top not exposed)
46 | 1 | Chert: hard, black, thin-bedded
s0f—
32 | 1 | Mudstone: hard, black, thin-bedded
100 }—
68 | 1 | Chert: hard, brittle, dark-gray to pinkish-gray, thick-bedded
150
Chert and limestone: 80 percent hard, black, thin-bedded chert; 20 percent hard, dark-gray,
82 | 1 | massive limestone
200 |—
PHOSPHATIC SHALE MEMBER
1 | 19 | Phosphate rock: oolitic, nodular, medium-hard, light-brownish-gray, contains omphalotrochus
A gastropods
u | 2 |-Mhudstone: medium-hard, brownish-gray?thin-bedded =
22 | Phosphate rock: argillaceous, oolitic, pisolitic, medium-hard, brownish-gray to black, thin-
a bedded; contains a few limestone concretions
IW : z
L \ Mudstone and phosphate rock: soft, brownish-black, thin-bedded mudstone, interbedded with
near base
Mudstone: medium-hard, brownish-gray, thin-bedded; 2-foot limestone bed at top; contains,
28 | © | phosphatic nodules in middle 12 feet
3 | 18 | Mudstone: phosphatic, oolitic, hard, grayish-brown, thin-bedded
5 | 2 | Mudstone: hard, brownish-gray, thick-bedded
3 | 12 | Mudstone: phosphatic, oolitic, medium-hard, brownish-gray, thin-bedded
S00 16 | 4 | Mudstone: nodular, hard, brownish-gray, thick-bedded, yellow-brown stain on joints
2 | 14 | Mudstone: phosphatic, nodular, oolitic, medium-hard, brownish-gray to black, thin-bedded
15 | 4 | Mudstone: nodular, hard, brownish-gray, thick-bedded
‘Mudstone: phosphatic, oolitic, soft, brownish-black to black, thin-bedded; contains many
18 | 8 | timestone tenses
4 | 1 |Limestone: hard, medium-gray, massive; contains black chert layers at base
350 ye | ¢ | Mudstone: soft, brownish-black, thin-bedded mudstone interbedded with phosphatic, oolitic,
soft, brownish“black, thin-bedded mudstone
2 | 8 | Limestone: hard, pale-brown,massive
‘Mudstone: phosphatic, oolitic, soft, brownish-black, thin-bedded; contains a few limestone
4 | 7 | “tenses
3 | 5 | Limestone: hard, pale-brown, massive
2 | i | Mudstone: phosphatic, oolitic, nodular, soft, brownish-black, thin-bedded
400 — 3_| 4 [Limestone: hard, brownish-gray, massive. "False cap" limestone _ -
ps 15_| 25 | Phosphate rock: argillaceous, oolitic, soft, brownish-gray to brownish-black, fissile
WS [= 7_| 33 | Phosphate rock: oolitic, medium-hard, brownish-black, thin-bedded
a ~~ \ ~~ 4 | 2 | Mudstone: medium-hard, dark-brown, thin-bedded
MKWKKQK GUC Phosphate rock: oolitic, hard, black, thin-bedded, Lower 0.5 foot contains white (tabular)
a 2 | 80 | “fossil fragments
£46 LITT ae

From McKelvey, Davidson, O'Malley, and Smith (1953)

GENERALIZED SECTION OF THE PHOSPHORIA FORMATION AT TRAIL CANYON,

JOHNSON CREEK QUADRANGLE, IDAHO

370729 © -56 (in pocket)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether an instrument of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which the instrument shown below is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. Applications may be examined between 8:30 A.M. and 5 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

*Docket Number:*                     00-009.                     *Applicant:*                     Purdue University, Department of Biological Sciences, Lilly Hall of Life Sciences, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1392.                     *Instrument:*                     Electron Microscope, Model CM300.                     *Manufacturer:*                     Philips, The Netherlands.                     *Intended Use:*                     The instrument is intended to be used in cryoelectron microscopy studies to determine the structure of some biological complexes. Samples studied will include non-icosahedral viruses, human rhinovirus, poliovirus, coxsackievirus, Ross River virus, Sindbis virus, Togavirus and Flavivirus families, Moloney murine leukemia virus, human papillomavirus, RNA-protein complexes, Band-3 protein in red blood cells, caveolae in the plasma membrane, KP4 fungal toxin, protein-protein complexes, photosynthetic membranes, large proteins, Colicin and other transmembrane transport systems. In addition, the instrument will be used for educational purposes in the graduate level courses BIO595 and BMS517. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 14, 2000.                 

Frank W. Creel, 

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. 00-10927 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P