alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1 – 906 Certification








GENMED HOLDING CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Genmed Holding Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Erwin R. Bouwens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ Erwin R. Bouwens


Erwin R. Bouwens


Chief Executive Officer


and Chairman of the Board





April 15, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Genmed Holding Corp., and will be retained by Genmed Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 15.105 Filing of requests for indemnification. A request for indemnification under this part— ( a ) May be filed by— ( 1 ) A publisher described in § 15.101 of this part; or
( 2 ) The publisher's duly authorized agent or legal representative;
( b ) Shall be filed with the Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; and
( c ) Shall state the basis for the publisher's assertion that indemnification under this part is required.
§ 1264.123 Protective order. ( a ) A party or a prospective witness or deponent may file a motion for a protective order with respect to discovery sought by an opposing party or with respect to the hearing, seeking to limit the availability or disclosure of evidence.
( b ) In issuing a protective order, the presiding officer may make any order which justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: ( 1 ) That the discovery not be had;
( 2 ) That the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation of the time or place;
( 3 ) That the discovery may be had only through a method of discovery other than that requested;
( 4 ) That certain matters not be inquired into, or that the scope of discovery be limited to certain matters;
( 5 ) That discovery be conducted with no one present except persons designated by the presiding officer;
( 6 ) That the contents of discovery or evidence be sealed;
( 7 ) That a deposition after being sealed be opened only by order of the presiding officer;
( 8 ) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, commercial information, or facts pertaining to any criminal investigation, proceeding, or other administrative investigation not be disclosed or be disclosed only in a designated way; or
( 9 ) That the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information enclosed in sealed envelopes to be opened as directed by the presiding officer.
11 

1278591 - R8SDMS 

STATE OF COLORADO 

John W. Hickenlooper, Governor 

Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH 

Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer 

Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 

4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. 

Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 

Phone (303) 692-2000 

Locatediin Glendale, Colorado 

www.colorado.gov/cdphe 

Gilorado Department 

of Public Health 

and Environment 

February 21, 2014 

Mr. Martin Hestmark 

U.S. EPA Region 8 (EPR-SR) 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver, Colorado 80202 

RE: CDPHE Concurrence on Partial Deletion of Operable Units 4,5 and 7 of the California 

Gulch Superfund Site, Lake County, Colorado 

Dear Mr. Hestmark: 

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) has reviewed the direct final 

Notice of Partial Deletion for Operable Units 4, 5 and 7 of the California Gulch Superfund Site in Lake 

County, Colorado. ^ 

EPA and the State have determined that all appropriate response actions under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation, mid Liability Act (CERCLA) have been completed, with the 

exception of operation and maintenance, monitoring, and five-year reviews. Furthermore, institutional 

controls (ICs) are in place, in the form of county and city ordinances, in order to ensure long-term 

protectiveness of the remedy. EPA will continue to conduct five-year reviews. 

Therefore, CDPHE agrees that all necessary actions have been taken to delete Operable Units 4, 5 and 7 

of the California Gulch Superfund Site from the National Priorities List. 

Sincerely, 

GaryW. Baughman 

Director 

Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division 

cc: Scott Schultz, AGO 

Doug Jamison, CDPHE 

Monica Sheets^ CDPHE
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

#### § 21.51 Duration.

A type certificate is effective until surrendered, suspended, revoked, or a termination date is otherwise established by the FAA.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3019-4 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 17:08:03 Desc:

***WITHDRAWN AS PER DE [3271]*** Appendix Agreement of Monetary Damages Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3019-4 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 17:08:03 Desc:

***WITHDRAWN AS PER DE [3271]*** Appendix Agreement of Monetary Damages Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3019-4 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 17:08:03 Desc:

***WITHDRAWN AS PER DE [3271]*** Appendix Agreement of Monetary Damages Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3019-4 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 17:08:03 Desc:

***WITHDRAWN AS PER DE [3271]*** Appendix Agreement of Monetary Damages Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
TriNet Corporate Realty Trust, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-29593), Form S-3
(File No. 333-42717), Form S-8 (File No. 333-02222), and Form S-8 (File No.
333-35149) of our report dated January 23, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of TriNet
Corporate Realty Trust, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of
the three years in then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.


                                          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



San Francisco, California
March 30, 1998
ahorre más en el

supermercado

10 consejos de MiPlato para estirar

el valor de su dinero

Las mejores maneras de ahorrar en el supermercado son usando cupones y buscando los mejores precios. 

El primer paso es saber dónde los encuentra. Use los consejos de MiPlato para estirar el valor de su dinero.

 

Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion

El USDA es un proveedor y empleador que ofrece igualdad 

de oportunidades para todos.

Visite www.ChooseMyPlate.gov

para obtener más información. 

 

DG TipSheet No. 37

Abril 2014

United States Department of Agriculture

10

consejos

Serie 

de Educación 

en Nutrición

1

encuentre buenos “descuentos en 

sus manos”

Busque cupones en sus recibos, avisos en los

productos y en los estantes de productos de los 

supermercados.

 

2 busque cupones

Varios supermercados envian cupones para 

promocionar productos, así que no los pierda entre el 

llamado “junk mail.” Usted también puede buscar cupones 

en internet. Revise sus cupones por lo menos una vez al 

mes y deseche los que ya expiraron.

3

busque ahorros en 

el periódico

En los periódicos del domingo

van insertados cupones para marcas

de productos conocidos—excepto en los días feriados. 

Algunos supermercados duplican el valor del cupón en días 

específicos.

4 afíliese al program de amigos del 

supermercado

La suscripción es usualmente gratis y usted puede 

recibir ofertas y cupones a través de su correo electrónico.

5 compre los productos cuando estén 

en oferta

Maximice sus ahorros usando cupones en productos 

de oferta. Usted podría encontrar buenos ahorros como 

“page por uno y lleve dos.”

6

infٕórmese acerca de los cupones de 

tiendas competidoras 

Varios supermercados aceptan cupones de otras 

tiendas para el mismo producto. Para más información, 

chequee en la oficina de Servicio al Consumidor.

7 organice sus cupones

 de manera que sean 

fáciles de encontrar

Organice los cupones por producto or en orden alfabético. 

Adapte un sistema que sea fácil para usted. Guárdelos en 

folders, organizadores de acordión o sobres.

8 encuentre un “amigo de cupones”

Intercambie los cupones que no usará con un amigo, 

se podrá deshacer de los que no usa y encontrará 

descuentos adicionales. 

9 compare las marcas

Los productos del supermercado pueden ser menos 

 costosos que los de marcas conocidas. Compara los 

precios de diferentes marcas para encontrar mejores 

precios.

10 compre sólo lo que 

está en su lista

Haga una lista de compras con 

los productos que necesita. Mantenga una 

lista en su teléfono celular, en el refrigerador 

o en su billetera. Cuando estés en el supermercado asegúrese de comprar sólo los 

productos de su lista.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.12

                        CERTAIN REGISTRATION RIGHTS UNDER
                          SECURITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                   ELCOM INTERNATIONAL AND ROBERT J. CROWELL,
                                  Assigned to:
                   ------------------------------------------



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               As to Number of
                                                                  Shares of
                  Assignee                                       Common Stock
                  --------                                     ---------------


<S>                                                            <C>    
Linda M. Crowell                                                    347,078

Christopher Crowell and Kathy Cioffi, as Co-Trustees of the 
KMC Trust No. 1
                                                                    158,677

Robert J. Crowell, as Trustee of the KMC Trust No. II               188,401
</TABLE>
§ 1252.403 Investigation. ( a ) *Informal inquiry.* ( 1 ) NASA will investigate complaints that are unresolved after mediation or are reopened because of a violation of a mediation agreement.
( 2 ) As part of the initial inquiry, NASA will use informal fact finding methods, including joint or separate discussions with the complainant and recipient to establish the facts, and, if possible, settle the complaint on terms that are mutually agreeable to the parties. NASA may seek the assistance of any involved State agency.
( 3 ) NASA will put any agreement in writing and have it signed by the parties and an authorized official at NASA.
( 4 ) The settlement shall not affect the operation of any other enforcement effort of NASA, including compliance reviews and investigation of other complaints which may involve the recipient.
( 5 ) The settlement is not a finding of discrimination against a recipient.
( b ) *Formal investigation.* If NASA cannot resolve the complaint through informal means it will develop formal findings through further investigations of the complaint. If the investigation indicates a violation of these regulations, NASA will attempt to obtain voluntary compliance. If NASA cannot obtain voluntary compliance, it will begin enforcement as described in § 1252.405.
[50 FR 13311, Apr. 4, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51352, Aug. 26, 2003]
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-11-0533

SAT Date: 9/27/2011

Print Date: 5/1/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1 Health: PMN ; Eco: intact material

2 3 Health: Incineration/Degradation product ; Eco: high concerfn for toxicity

incomplete incineration products to terrestrial organisms

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 1 1 PMN

3 3 2 Incin Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ; PMN slow; Incin Pdt rapid

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-11-0533

FATE: 

S = Disp.

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 0

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo
Sorption to soils/sediments = PMN strong; Incin Pdt low

PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Incin Pdt P3B3

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN slow; Incin Pdt rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin, nil through the lungs 

and GI tract as the neat material, and poor through the lungs and GI tract for the low molecular 

weight fraction when in solution based on physical/chemical 

properties. There is concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on changes 

of the natural surfactant balance in the lungs. Low moderate concern. 

For the potential incomplete incineration product/degradation product, based on test data for the 

analogue concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male 

reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral NOAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver 

toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all 

doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 

males in the 90-day oral study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential 

for male reproductive toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity 

based on data for Moderate concern.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100

daphnid 48-h LC50 >100

green algal 96-h EC50 >100

fish _ chronic value >10

daphnid _ chronic 

value

>10

algal _ chronic 

value

>10

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR 

chemical class = polymer-nonionic 

 with mp < 20 C (P); S = dispersible in water based on analogs 

(P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 

concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 1000
(ppb)

SARs nonionic polymers

SAR Class polymer-nonioicEcotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
Final Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems 

Meeting Documentation Interagency Meeting – Overview of Key Comments and Responses, AuDate Staff Contact Information 

(Name, email, phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.)

Written CommProvided? Did they also submit to Dock

8/18 Suzie Kocchi, 

Kocchi.suzanne@epa.gov

202-343-9387 

Agencies attending: OMB, EPA, SBA, BOEMRE, CEA, CEQ, DOE 

A conference call was held to provide the interagency group an overview on the key comments and responses on petroleum and natural gas systems. 

N/A
# AGENCY:

 Minerals Management Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

 Notice of Public Workshop. 

# SUMMARY:

                         The Minerals Management Service (MMS) is giving notice of a public workshop concerning the supplementary proposed Indian oil value rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 5, 2000, (65 FR 403). The proposed rule would amend the royalty valuation regulations for crude oil produced from Indian leases.                     

# DATES:

 The public workshop will be held in Lakewood, Colorado, on February 8, 2000, beginning at 9 a.m. and ending at 3 p.m., Mountain time. 

# ADDRESSES:

 The workshop will be held at the Minerals Management Service, Royalty Management Program, Denver Federal Center, Auditorium, Building 85, Kipling Street (between 6th Avenue and Alameda Pkwy), Lakewood, CO 80215, telephone number (303) 231-3585. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Mr. Peter Christnacht, Royalty Valuation Division, Royalty Management Program, Minerals Management Service, P.O. Box 25165, MS 3151, Denver, Colorado, 80225-0165, telephone number (303) 275-7252; or, Mr. David S. Guzy, Chief, Rules and Publications Staff, Royalty Management Program, Minerals Management Service, P.O. Box 25165, MS 3021, Denver, Colorado 80225-0165, telephone number (303) 231-3432, fax number (303) 231-3385, e-mail David.Guzy@mms.gov. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 The workshop will be open to the public in order to discuss the supplementary proposed rule and gather comments. We encourage members of the public to attend this meeting. Those wishing to make formal presentations should sign up upon arrival. The sign-up sheet will determine the order of speakers. For building security measures, each person will be required to sign in and may be required to present a picture identification to gain entry to the meeting. 

Dated: January 11, 2000. 

Lucy Querques Denett, 

Associate Director for Royalty Management.

[FR Doc. 00-1099 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
rev. Dec. 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

You must accompany your complaint with this Category Sheet, and the Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44).

1. Title (caption) of the Case (provide only the names of the first party on each side):

2. Indicate the category to which this case belongs:

3. Indicate the title and number of related cases (if any).

4. Has a prior action between the same parties and based on the same claim ever been filed before this Court?

5. Is this case required to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2284?

6. Does this case question the constitutionality of a state statute? (See, Fed.R.Civ. P. 24)

CATEGORY SHEET

 Ordinary Civil Case

 Social Security

 Banking

 Injunction

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Date Submitted:

Email Address:

USDC-PR Bar Number:

Attorney Name (Last, First, MI):

Plaintiff:

Defendant:

Print Form

In re Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, jointly administered under main Case No. 17-03283.

7/13/2023

Reset Form

rcq@mcvpr.com

211512

Quiñones-Rivera, Roberto C. 

Government of Puerto Rico ex rel. Francisco Pujol Meneses

UBS Bank, USA

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-6 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Category Sheet Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal C 453A/17 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 453A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5717 December 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 453A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5717 December 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2014/C 453A/01 | Addendum to the reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AST/111/10 — Assistants (AST 1) in the secretarial field | 1 |
| 2014/C 453A/02 | Addendum to the reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/177/10 — Administrators (AD 5) | 2 |
| 2014/C 453A/03 | Second addendum to the reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/249/13 — Administrators (AD 7) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2014/C 453A/01

Addendum to the reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AST/111/10 — Assistants (AST 1) in the secretarial field

1

2014/C 453A/02

Addendum to the reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/177/10 — Administrators (AD 5)

2

2014/C 453A/03

Second addendum to the reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/249/13 — Administrators (AD 7)

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 453A/04 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 4 |

2014/C 453A/04

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

4

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1750

TAMILLA L. BARNARD RAMSEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Dennis L. Howell,

Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00234-DLH)

Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 17, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

V. Lamar Gudger, III, GUDGER & GUDGER, P.A., Asheville, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States

Attorney, Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Robert

J. Triba, Chief Regional Counsel, Region I, Jason W. Valencia,

Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

2

PER CURIAM:

Tamilla L. Bernard Ramsey appeals the magistrate judge’s

order affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny supplemental

security income.*

 We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if

the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct

law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater,

76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the

parties’ briefs, administrative record, and the materials submitted

in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm. See Ramsey v. Astrue, No. 1:06-cv-00234-DLH (W.D.N.C.

June 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 10.2**

**“Summary Sheet” of Employment Agreement**

**With Dennis McGuire**

On May 5, 2009, the board of directors of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) approved an amendment to the compensation arrangement with Dennis McGuire, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. McGuire receives $250,000 per year for a two-year term beginning May 1, 2009 and terminating on April 30, 2009. He also receives a bonus of 3% of the Company’s revenues from operations, including licensing revenues from any transaction with Bledsoe Capital Group, LLC or a similar licensing arrangement. In addition, Mr. McGuire shall be eligible for an annual bonus at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Exhibit A 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3142-1 Filed:05/24/18 Entered:05/24/18 15:47:00 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 2


	


		
  !"##$%&'(''(!)##%	
*	+	*
			++,-.,/ 0(1$2345678

89:;<=)+>>	,?@ABCDE@AFGEGHIJHKJLBBJFMAGNOJFPKHCJK@FQKRFDMKSFTTFGUKED@VWSIXYZL[ARBC@K>-

.,,\	+,-,+	>-	,-	
]
*,>,1-^,*_,>+,._ %,-,-	-	+,+,	

2+		-]
1-^,*_,>+,._ %,-,-	,-	
,,>
		/ 0(1

12>++,-	,*	,,.--'		`]\/,,\		-/ 0(1=	+,+,-

,./,,\	#/ 0(1+>	**>	/ 0(11-,-,

a*-+,+,-1--,	
/ 0(11+*.*	
	-b-*,>,1-^,*_,>+

,._ %,-,-		
*		*c	,,./ 0(11d+,,.	b,,.+,+,-\	

	>,c-,	**>	=

/,	*

e0	f_		gg

/,+",#h#i

*e,j\e*,

34567889:;<k:lmn;l:<nopqrstuvwxyk:w:pl:nz{:<<w:|:;<

t}nmnlpw

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3142-1 Filed:05/24/18 Entered:05/24/18 15:47:00 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 2