alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
180517 ORD RE ALONSO EXT MOT VERSION MAY 17, 2018 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

----------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: PROMESA 

 Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered) 

et al., 

 Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x 

ORDER DENYING THE EXTENSION MOTION 

FILED BY MARIA E. ALONSO-FUENTES (DOCKET ENTRY NO. 3073) 

The Court has received and reviewed the Motion for Leave to File Pleadings and 

or Documents and for an Extension of Time to File the English Translation (the “Extension 

Motion,” Docket Entry No. 3073) filed by Maria E. Alonso-Fuentes (the “Movant”). The 

Extension Motion seeks leave to file translated copies of certain documents. However, the 

Extension Motion does not identify the specific pleading or proof of claim that relates to the 

translated documents. The Extension Motion generally states that the translated documents are 

being filed “[i]n support of [Movant’s] claim.” As such, the Court assumes that the translated 

documents relate to the proof of claim that was filed by the Movant in the above-captioned Title 

III proceeding. (See Proof Claim No. 1069-1.) 

Pursuant to this Court’s prior Order, “[a]ll proofs of claim must (i) be written in 

English or Spanish . . . [and] (iv) include a copy of the supporting . . . in English or Spanish.” 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). 

(Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3083 Filed:05/17/18 Entered:05/17/18 13:04:53 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
180517 ORD RE ALONSO EXT MOT VERSION MAY 17, 2018 2 

(See Docket Entry No. 2521 ¶ 12.) Because no English translation of the supporting documents 

is required, the Extension Motion is denied. 

This Order resolves Docket Entry No. 3073. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 17, 2018 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN 

 United States District Judge 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3083 Filed:05/17/18 Entered:05/17/18 13:04:53 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 12

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. AND CONSOLIDATEDAFFILIATES

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

and

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges andPreferred Stock Dividends

Nine Months Ended September 28, 2002

(Unaudited)

 
*(Dollars in millions)***Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges **Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and      Preferred Stock Dividends
Net earnings
$

 3,520 
$
 3,520
Provision for income taxes
721 
721
Minority interest in net earnings of consolidated      affiliates
113 
113    
Earnings before provision for income taxes and minority      interest
4,354 
4,354
Fixed charges:   
Interest      
7,471 
7,471
One-third of rentals      
242 
242    
Total fixed charges
7,713 
7,713
Less interest capitalized, net of amortization
(29) 
(29)    
Earnings before provision for income taxes and minority        interest, plus fixed charges      
$

 12,038 
$
12,038    
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
1.56      
Preferred stock dividend requirements
$
 -
Ratio of earnings before provision for income taxes to net      earnings  
1.20
Preferred stock dividend factor on pre-tax basis  
-
Fixed charges  
7,713
Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividend      requirements
$
7,713    
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and        preferred stock dividends        
1.56
 

For purposes of computing the ratios, fixed charges consist ofinterest on all indebtedness and one-third of rentals, which management believesis a reasonable approximation of the interest factor of such rentals.

24****
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


The following is a list of Avalon's subsidiaries except for unnamed subsidiaries
which considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a
significant subsidiary.


     Subsidiary Name                              State of Incorporation
------------------------------------------------------------------------


 . American Landfill Management, Inc                         Ohio
 . American Waste Management Services, Inc.                  Ohio
 . Antech Ltd.                                               Pennsylvania
 . Avalon Lakes Golf, Inc.                                   Ohio
     . Avalon Travel, Inc.                                  Ohio
     . TBG, Inc.                                            Ohio
 . AWS Remediation, Inc.                                     Pennsylvania
 . DartAmericA, Inc.                                         Ohio
     . Dart Trucking Company, Inc.                          Ohio
          - Dart Realty, Inc.                               Ohio
          - Dart Services, Inc.                             Ohio
     . TRB National Systems, Inc.                           Ohio
 . Earth Sciences Consultants, Inc.                          Pennsylvania


Parent/subsidiary relationships are indicated by indentations. In each case,
100% of the voting securities of each of the subsidiaries is owned by the
indicated parent of such subsidiary.
§ 125.179 Fuel system independence. ( a ) Each airplane fuel system must be arranged so that the failure of any one component does not result in the irrecoverable loss of power of more than one engine.
( b ) A separate fuel tank need not be provided for each engine if the certificate holder shows that the fuel system incorporates features that provide equivalent safety.
§ 16.202 Powers of a hearing officer. In accordance with the rules of this subpart, a hearing officer may: ( a ) Give notice of, and hold, prehearing conferences and hearings;
( b ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( c ) Issue subpoenas authorized by law and issue notices of deposition requested by the parties;
( d ) Limit the frequency and extent of discovery;
( e ) Rule on offers of proof;
( f ) Receive relevant and material evidence;
( g ) Regulate the course of the hearing in accordance with the rules of this part to avoid unnecessary and duplicative proceedings in the interest of prompt and fair resolution of the matters at issue;
( h ) Hold conferences to settle or to simplify the issues by consent of the parties;
( i ) Dispose of procedural motions and requests;
( j ) Examine witnesses; and
( k ) Make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and issue an initial decision.
Appendix 1

Item Source Annotation for Extant Census and BLS Data Collections

Question 1. Was not derived from existing federal person-level income surveys, but is needed to 

verify that the respondent matches existing frame information.

Question 2. This leading “No/Yes” item summarizes several pages of employment questions 

that precede earnings questions in the March CPS. This is the same approach as used in the 

National Youth Longitudinal Survey income questions (please see 

https://www.nlsinfo.org/content/cohorts/nlsy97/other-documentation/questionnaires, under round 

16 income – item YINC – 1400).

Question 2a asks about earnings from the job held the longest during a calendar year and was 

derived from March CPS items Q47a (instruction to focus on the job held the longest), and 

Q48aa and Q48aad (request for all earnings from the longest job)(please see 

http://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/techdocs/cpsmar14.pdf, appendix D). 

Question 2b asks about earnings from all other jobs and was derived from March CPS items 

Q49b1d and Q49B1A. 

Questions 3 and 3a ask specifically about self-employment earnings. The items were derived 

from parallel items in NSLY, particularly items YINC-2000 and YINC-2100. The approach to 

asking about earnings is also similar to item Q48b in the March CPS. Note that in concordance 

with recommendations from expert reviewers, the concept of ‘net earnings’ was clarified for item 

3a in the current survey.

Questions 4 and 4a ask about earnings from other jobs outside of regular jobs. It is based on 

items Q73A1 T and Q731 in the March CPS. Wording modifications were needed to fit the 

population of interest for the current earnings survey.

Questions 5 and 5a ask about any other earnings and are based on item Q731 in the March CPS. 

An adjustment was made because the March CPS item focuses on income and the items in the 

earnings survey focuses on earnings as opposed to overall income.
#### § 25.1522 Auxiliary power unit limitations.

If an auxiliary power unit is installed in the airplane, limitations established for the auxiliary power unit, including categories of operation, must be specified as operating limitations for the airplane.

[Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29786, July 20, 1990]
#### R. E. Rose, *et al., Appellants,*v. John W. Henderson, *et al., Appellees.*

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Under the statute “no agreement for the sale or conveyance of her (a married woman’s) real property or for relinquishment of dower, shall be specifically enforced unless it be executed and acknowledged in the form prescribed for conveyances of her real property and for relinquishment of dower.”

Mrs. Waldo did not herself sign or acknowledge the execution of the contract, and no showing is made that her husband was duly authorized to make a contract that would be specifically enforceable against the wife under the statute. Mrs. Murphrée had not acknowledged the execution of the contract when the suit was begfin, so it cannot be enforced against her in this suit, the same as to her being prematurely brought.

The actual execution of the contract by Mrs. Murphree and by Mr. Waldo for his wife indicated their willingness at the time to convey their interests but as they now interpose the defense that the contract was acknowledged by the married woman as required by the statute, and as for this reason the contract *ccurmot Ire specifically enforced*against the married women, it will not be specifically enforced against John W. Henderson, for the reason, that, though the interests of the vendors are several and the contract is not joint, the intention was to convey the interests of all or none, and this was known to the vendees.

When it appears that the married women have not acknowledged the execution of the contract as required by the statute for specific performance against them, it *604is not necessary to formally prove that the married women are in fact unwilling to convey according to their contract which is not enforceable against them.

As the st'atute authorizes the specific enforcement of a married woman’s contract to convey land only when it is duly executed *and*acknowledged by her, the court cannot specifically enforce the contract as to her when it has not been duly acknowledged, even though her refusal to perform her contract operates inequitably on those who have acted on the faith of her contract to convey. See Goss v. Furman, 21 Fla. 406. Those who contract with married women are held to notice that such contracts are in general void, and that rights adverse to a married woman may be acquired through her contracts only by a compliance with the provisions of law on the subject.

Eehearing denied.

Whitfield, C. J., and Taylor, Si-iackleford and Hocker, J. J., concur.

Cockrell, J., dissenting.
#### FRANK A. VANDERLIP v. UNITED STATES

*[Ante,*p. 489;

293 U.S. 588]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court October 8, 1934.
§ 135.425 Maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration programs. Each certificate holder shall have an inspection program and a program covering other maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations, that ensures that— ( a ) Maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations performed by it, or by other persons, are performed under the certificate holder's manual;
( b ) Competent personnel and adequate facilities and equipment are provided for the proper performance of maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations; and
( c ) Each aircraft released to service is airworthy and has been properly maintained for operation under this part.
#### § 25.1393 Minimum intensities in any vertical plane of forward and rear position lights.

Each position light intensity must equal or exceed the applicable values in the following table:

| Angle above or below the horizontal plane | Intensity, *l* |
| --- | --- |
| 0° | 1.00 |
| 0° to 5° | 0.90 |
| 5° to 10° | 0.80 |
| 10° to 15° | 0.70 |
| 15° to 20° | 0.50 |
| 20° to 30° | 0.30 |
| 30° to 40° | 0.10 |
| 40° to 90° | 0.05 |
EXHIBIT 32 -- Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
              Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Australian-Canadian Oil
Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended December 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert
Kamon, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



April, 13, 2006                          /s/ Andre Sakhai
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Andre Sakhai, President and
                                       Chief Executive Officer



April 13, 2006                           /s/ Robert Kamon
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Kamon
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




                                      F-20
**Exhibit
      32**
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF
      SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)
 
 Pursuant
      to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
      63
      of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Unit
      Corporation a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such
      officer’s knowledge, that:
 
 The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
      the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and for the three and six
      month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
 
 
 Dated:
      August 2, 2007
 
 By:
      /s/ Larry D. Pinkston
 Larry
      D.
      Pinkston
 Chief
      Executive Officer and
 Director
 
 
 Dated:
      August 2, 2007
 
 By:
      /s/ David T. Merrill
 David
      T.
      Merrill
 Chief
      Financial Officer and
 Treasurer
 
 
 The
      foregoing certification is being
      furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
      Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
      disclosure document.
 
 A
      signed original of this written
      statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
      provided to Unit Corporation and will be retained by Unit Corporation and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on
      request.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-48 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-48 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-48 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 3 of 3
Exhibit A

Claim Claimant Debtor Total Filed

27812 MARCANO GARCIA, LUIS Commonwealth of Puerto Rico $ 20,000.00

31410 RODRIGUEZ SABATER, SADDER Commonwealth of Puerto Rico $ -

44305 MULERO ARZUAGA, JOSE O. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico $ -

75326 VELEZ MARTINEZ, ELIZABETH Commonwealth of Puerto Rico $ -

78707 DEL RIO ROSA, VANESSA Commonwealth of Puerto Rico $ -

84203 VELEZ MARTINEZ, ELIZABETH Commonwealth of Puerto Rico $ 94,500.00

98792 VELEZ MARTINEZ, ELIZABETH Commonwealth of Puerto Rico $ 10,500.00

140263 RIVERA, NANCY Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico $ -

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24592-1 Filed:06/16/23 Entered:06/16/23 13:51:16 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B d e C.V. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                    
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 30, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ José Antonio Fernández Carbajal
|                    |  |  |  | José Antonio Fernández Carbajal    
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer            



|                    |  |  |  |                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 30, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Javier Astaburuaga Sanjines
|                    |  |  |  | Javier Astaburuaga Sanjines    
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
# CE2004065EN.01010901.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/109 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/109

---

(2004/C 65 E/121)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2003/03

by Salvador Garriga Polledo (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 June 2003)

Subject:   Free circulation of euro notes

Subject:

Almost from the outset, the free circulation of euro notes has been hampered by an obstacle that, though expected, is none the less tiresome and worrying, namely the fact that some notes, particularly those above EUR 50, are not accepted by some traders.

Signs marked ‘notes above EUR 50 not accepted’ are a common sight in shops and other sales outlets.

Are there any provisions which allow traders to refuse to accept euro notes of whatever denomination and, if not, do prospective purchasers have any legal recourse against measures which restrict the circulation of specific denominations?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(23 July 2003)

(23 July 2003)

According to Article 106 (1), 3rd sentence, of the EC Treaty and Article 10 of Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro (1) all denominations of euro banknotes have legal tender status. While this Regulation introduces a further limitation (see Article 11) on the maximum number of coins which any party is obliged to accept, no further rules are laid down in relation to banknotes. The different banknote denominations are specified in a decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) Governing Council. The concept of legal tender is undefined in Community law, and should therefore be interpreted against the background of national rules and practices.

1

There is no European legislation, which provides legal recourse against the restricted acceptance of certain banknotes. Different legal provisions may apply according to the monetary and civil laws of Member States.

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 11.5.1998.

1

---
#### § 1259.301 Identification of national needs.

National needs shall be identified by the Administrator who shall consider specific national needs and problems relating to space proposed by the Space Grant Review Panel, any NASA official or any person.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHAWNDREKA MONIQUE GREEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-325

[July 7, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; James L. Martz, Judge; L.T. Case No. L.T. 50-2022-MH000067-XXXX-SB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jacqueline I. 

Kurland, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 121.223 Proof of compliance with § 121.221.

Compliance with those provisions of § 121.221 that refer to compartment accessibility, the entry of hazardous quantities of smoke or extinguishing agent into compartments occupied by the crew or passengers, and the dissipation of the extinguishing agent in Class “C” compartments must be shown by tests in flight. During these tests it must be shown that no inadvertent operation of smoke or fire detectors in other compartments within the airplane would occur as a result of fire contained in any one compartment, either during the time it is being extinguished, or thereafter, unless the extinguishing system floods those compartments simultaneously.