Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 87 / Thursday, May 4, 2000 / Notices 25945

workers of Cross Creek Apparel, Walnut

Cove, North Carolina.

The intent of the Department’’s

certification is in include all workers of

Cross Creek Apparel, Inc., Walnut Cove,

North Carolina adversely affected by

increased imports.

The amended notice applicable to

TA–W–37,451 is hereby issued as

follows:

‘‘All workers of Cross Creek Apparel,

Walnut Cove, North Carolina who became

totally or partially separted from employment

on or after February 21, 1999 through April

4, 2002 are eligible to apply for adjustment

assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act

of 1974.’’

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 20th day

of April, 2000.

[FR Doc. 00–11112 Filed 5–3–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–36,874]

Fahnos Apparel, Inc. El Paso, TX;

Amended Certification Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the

Department of Labor issued a

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance on

November 19, 1999 applicable to

workers of Fashions Apparel

Corporation, El Paso, Texas. The notice

was published in the Federal Register

on December 28, 1999 (64 FR 72691).

At the request of the State agency, the

Department reviewed the certification

for workers of the subject firm. New

findings show that the Department

incorrectly identified the subject firm

name in its entirety. The Department is

amending the certification

determination to correctly identify the

subject firm title name to read ‘‘Fahnos

Apparel, Inc.’’.

The amended notice applicable to

TA–W–36,874 is hereby issued as

follows:

All workers of Fahnos Apparel, Inc., El

Paso, Texas who became totally or partially

separated from employment on or after

September 10, 1998 through November 19,

2001 are eligible to apply for adjustment

assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act

of 1974.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 20th day

of April 2000.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00–11110 Filed 5–3–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

TA–W–35,196

New Monarch Machine Tool, Inc.

Formerly Known as Monarch Machine

Tool Company Cortland, NY; Amended

Certification Regarding Eligibility To

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 2273) the

Department of Labor issued a

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance on

December 2, 1998, applicable to workers

of Monarch Machine Tool Co., Cortland,

New York. The notice was published in

the Federal Register on December 23,

1998 (63 FR 71165).

At the request of the State agency, the

Department reviewed the certification

for workers of the subject firm. The

workers are engaged in the production

of vertical machining centers. Findings

show that Monarch Machine Tool Co.

was sold in February, 2000 to local

management and is now known as New

Monarch Machine Tool, Inc. The

Department is amending the

certification determination to correctly

identify the new title name to read

‘‘New Monarch Machine Tool, Inc.,

(formerly known as Monarch Machine

Tool Co.)’’, Cortland, New York.

The amended notice applicable to

TA–W–35,196 is hereby issued as

follows:

All workers of New Monarch Machine

Tool, Inc. (formerly known as Monarch

Machine Tool Co.), Cortland, New York who

became totally or partially separated from

employment on or after October 28, 1997

through December 2, 2000 are eligible to

apply for adjustment assistance under

Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Dated: Signed at Washington, D.C. this

25th day of April, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00–11111 Filed 5–3–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–37,082]

Outboard Marine Corporation, OMC

Evinrude Plant Milwaukee, Wisconsin;

Notice of Negative Determination

Regarding Application for

Reconsideration

By application dated March 24, 2000,

the United Steelworkers of America

(USWA), Local 1302, request

administrative reconsideration of the

Department’s negative determination

regarding worker eligibility to apply for

TAA. The denial notice applicable to

workers of the subject firm located in

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, was signed on

March 3, 2000 and published in the

Federal Register on March 17, 2000 (65

14627).

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)

reconsideration may be granted under

the following circumstances:

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts

not previously considered that the

determination complained of was

erroneous;

(2) if it appears that the determination

complained of was based on a mistake

in the determination of facts not

previously considered; or

(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying

Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of

the law justified reconsideration of the

decision.

Findings of the initial investigation

show that workers of Outboard Marine

Corporation, OMC Evinrude Plant,

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, producing

component parts for outboard motors

were denied eligibility to apply for TAA

based on the finding that the

‘‘contributed importantly’’ criterion of

the worker group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, was not

met. Layoffs were attributable to the

company’s decision to consolidate

operations and outsource to U.S.

manufacturers.

The USWA, Local 1302, states that

OMC has entered into an agreement

with Suzuki of Japan for the purchase of

marine power products, and provided

the number of units to be purchased

from that supplier this year. This

information was available to the

Department during the investigation but

not elaborated on in the notice of

negative determination. The subject firm

did not import, nor were there any

scheduled imports, of components like

or directly competitive with those

produced by workers of the firm.