alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- AUGUST 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q 2ND QUARTER FISCAL 2000 -- LAROCHE INDUSTRIES INC.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (408)
<INVENTORY>                                     23,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,579
<PP&E>                                         386,464
<DEPRECIATION>                               (132,525)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 410,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          376,866
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,670)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   410,324
<SALES>                                        182,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,750
<CGS>                                          169,105
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,223
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,025)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,033)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 11-14-00258-CR

Marcus Dwight Booth v.

STYLE: The State of Texas

COA DISPOSITION: DISMISSED

OFFENSE: 1

COUNTY: Midland

TRIAL COURT: 385th District Court

DATE: 10/16/14 Publish: NO TC CASE #: CR42435

COA DISPOSITION: DISMISSED TRIAL COURT: 385th District Court

DATE: 10/16/14 Publish: NO TC CASE #: CR42435

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Marcus Dwight Booth v.

STYLE: The State of Texas

PRO SE Petition

14*0-/V

CCA #: PD-1459-14

CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

KzW&3> JUDGE:

DATE: 0$h$lMLr SIGNED: PC:

JUDGE: rM L/jIAsl4*^- PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41599

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

versus

ISRAEL GARZA,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CR-1064-1

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Israel Garza contests his 240-month prison term for possession with 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 27, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41599 Document: 00513736944 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/27/2016
No. 15-41599

2

intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine. He contends that the 

district court could sentence him to only a ten-year maximum because the 

information filed under 21 U.S.C. § 851 indicated that the enhancement was 

being sought under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(b). The government moves to dismiss 

the appeal on the basis that Garza failed to file a timely notice of appeal.

The record supports the government’s contention. Garza filed his notice 

of appeal almost eighteen months after entry of judgment, well beyond the 

fourteen days that is permitted and also well beyond the time during which 

the district court could have granted an extension on a showing of either 

excusable neglect or good cause. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i), (b)(4); United 

States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000). Although the untimely 

filing of an appeal in a criminal case is not jurisdictional, see United States v. 

Martinez, 496 F.3d 387, 388–89 (5th Cir. 2007), this court will not disregard 

untimeliness where the government raises the issue, see Eberhart v. United 

States, 546 U.S. 12, 18 (2005).

The motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as 

untimely. 

 Case: 15-41599 Document: 00513736944 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/27/2016
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 4

- 00 329

- CR

Anthony Lee Gardner

, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 0001942 , HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On October 31, 2000, Anthony Lee Gardner was sentenced to fifteen years in prison for
sexually assaulting a child. On March 22, 2004, Gardner filed a motion for out of time appeal in the district

court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). The court overruled the motion and the record was forwarded to this

Court. The court certified that this is a plea bargain case and Gardner has no right of appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 25.2(d).

Because the notice of appeal was not timely, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the
purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of ju risdiction. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522

- 23 (Tex. Crim. App.
1996).2 The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ Jan P. Patterson, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: June 24, 2004

Do Not Publish
Editorial Note on Part 183
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 183.63 Continuing requirements: Products, parts or appliances. For any approval or certificate for a product, part or appliance issued under the authority of this subpart, an ODA Holder must: ( a ) Monitor reported service problems related to certificates or approvals it holds;
( b ) Notify the Administrator of: ( 1 ) A condition in a product, part or appliance that could result in a finding of unsafe condition by the Administrator; or
( 2 ) A product, part or appliance not meeting the applicable airworthiness requirements for which the ODA Holder has obtained or issued a certificate or approval.
( c ) Investigate any suspected unsafe condition or finding of noncompliance with the airworthiness requirements for any product, part or appliance, as required by the Administrator, and report to the Administrator the results of the investigation and any action taken or proposed.
( d ) Submit to the Administrator the information necessary to implement corrective action needed for safe operation of the product, part or appliance.
[Doc. No. FAA-2003-16685, 70 FR 59947, Oct. 13, 2005, as amended by Amdt. 183-14, 76 FR 8893, Feb. 16, 2011]
Exhibit 10.9(6)


     BY COUNTERSIGNING BELOW, I, ON BEHALF OF MYSELF AND MY COMPANY, 3 WISHES
PRODUCTIONS, INC., HEREBY REPRESENT THAT:
     1) I HAVE READ THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE FOREGOING LICENSE AND SUPPLY
AGREEMENT BETWEEN MOTOROLA, INC. AND PTN MEDIA, INC. ("LICENSE AND SUPPLY
AGREEMENT");
     2) THE BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP AND THE GRANT OF RIGHTS BETWEEN MOTOROLA, INC.
AND PTN MEDIA INC. SET FORTH IN THE LICENSE AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT ARE APPROVED OF
AND AUTHORIZED BY ME, EVEN THOUGH THE PHONE FACEPLATE AND/OR BATTERY DOOR
BEARING MY NAME, IMAGE, LIKENESS, AND/OR ENDORSEMENT THAT ARE REFERENCED IN THE
LICENSE AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT ARE NOT TRADITIONALLY KNOWN AS HAND HELD COMPUTERS
AND DO NOT USE/RUN THE PALM(TM) OPERATING SYSTEM;
     3) I HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO ANY OTHER PARTY THAT WOULD PROHIBIT OR IMPAIR ME
FROM AUTHORIZING OR APPROVING OF THE LICENSE AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT; AND
     4) I AGREE TO RETAIN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LICENSE AND SUPPLY
AGREEMENT IN CONFIDENCE.


By: /s/  Christina Aguilera
   --------------------------------------------------

Name:    Christina Aguilera
     ------------------------------------------------


Title:  Self and President of 3 Wishes Productions, Inc.
      --------------------------------------------------

Date:   December 18, 2001
     ------------------------------------------------



         STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
                                                     ss:
         COUNTY OF ___________________)

                    SWORN TO and subscribed before me this __________ day of
               _______________ , 2002.


         ---------------------------------------------------------
         (Signature of Officer Administering Oath or of
          Notary Public, State of California)

         ---------------------------------------------------------
         (Print, type, or stamp commissioned name of Notary Public)
         Personally Known to me:
                                            -----------------------------
         Produced Identification:
                                            -----------------------------
         Type of Identification Produced
                                            -----

         My commission expires:
                                            -----------------------------
#### § 217.7 Certification.

The certification for BTS Form 41 Schedule T-100(f) shall be signed by an officer of the air carrier with the requisite authority over the collection of data and preparation of reports to ensure the validity and accuracy of the reported data.

[53 FR 46294, Nov. 16, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 66722, Dec. 26, 1995]
# Official Journal C 330/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 330 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6118 September 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 330

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6118 September 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2018/C 330/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2018/C 330/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1

1

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 135.159 Equipment requirements: Carrying passengers under VFR at night or under VFR over-the-top conditions. No person may operate an aircraft carrying passengers under VFR at night or under VFR over-the-top, unless it is equipped with— ( a ) A gyroscopic rate-of-turn indicator except on the following aircraft: ( 1 ) Airplanes with a third attitude instrument system usable through flight attitudes of 360 degrees of pitch-and-roll and installed in accordance with the instrument requirements prescribed in § 121.305(j) of this chapter.
( 2 ) Helicopters with a third attitude instrument system usable through flight attitudes of ±80 degrees of pitch and ±120 degrees of roll and installed in accordance with § 29.1303(g) of this chapter.
( 3 ) Helicopters with a maximum certificated takeoff weight of 6,000 pounds or less.
( b ) A slip skid indicator.
( c ) A gyroscopic bank-and-pitch indicator.
( d ) A gyroscopic direction indicator.
( e ) A generator or generators able to supply all probable combinations of continuous in-flight electrical loads for required equipment and for recharging the battery.
( f ) For night flights— ( 1 ) An anticollision light system;
( 2 ) Instrument lights to make all instruments, switches, and gauges easily readable, the direct rays of which are shielded from the pilots' eyes; and
( 3 ) A flashlight having at least two size “D” cells or equivalent.
( g ) For the purpose of paragraph (e) of this section, a continuous in-flight electrical load includes one that draws current continuously during flight, such as radio equipment and electrically driven instruments and lights, but does not include occasional intermittent loads.
( h ) Notwithstanding provisions of paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), helicopters having a maximum certificated takeoff weight of 6,000 pounds or less may be operated until January 6, 1988, under visual flight rules at night without a slip skid indicator, a gyroscopic bank-and-pitch indicator, or a gyroscopic direction indicator.
[Doc. No. 24550, 51 FR 40709, Nov. 7, 1986, as amended by Amdt. 135-38, 55 FR 43310, Oct. 26, 1990]
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6050

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DION LEVERING WILLIAMS, a/k/a Tion Williams, a/k/a Scroll, a/k/a Squirrel , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:12

- cr - 00047

- HEH

- RC Y

- 4; 3:14

- cv 00342

- HEH

- RCY )

Submitted : June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jeffrey Michael Brandt, ROBINSON & BRANDT, PSC, Covington, Kentucky, for Appellant. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dion Levering Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial show ing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requis ite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the dec isional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avenue A, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Brian P. McAndrews,
the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 14, 2002

                                      /s/ Brian P. McAndrews
                                      --------------------------------------

                                       Brian P. McAndrews
                                       Chief Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F.
Wells, III, Principal Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Principal Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Leo F. Wells, III      
|Leo F. Wells, III          
|Principal Executive Officer
|August 8, 2007             



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Douglas P. Williams    
|Douglas P. Williams        
|Principal Financial Officer
|August 8, 2007
Exhibit A

Proposed Order 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 As representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.

 Debtors.1

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

This Order shall be filed in Case 

No. 17-BK-3283-LTS, Case No. 17-BK4780-LTS, and Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS. 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES IN CONNECTION 

WITH AUTONOMOUS MUNICIPALITY OF PONCE’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL LIFT OF STAY 

 The Court has received and reviewed the Motion for Extension of Deadlines (Docket Entry No. 

in Case No. 17-3283, the “Extension Motion”). The Extension Motion is hereby granted to extent 

provided herein. The deadline for Movant’s AMP to reply to ALL opposition filed by Debtors must be 

filed by July 19, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). 

This order resolves Docket Entry No. 3333 and No. 3446 in Case No. 17-3283. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July ____, 2018 

 

___________________________ 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN 

United States District Judge 

                                                            

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last four 

(4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283- LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales 

Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of 

the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers 

due to software limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3461-1 Filed:07/10/18 Entered:07/10/18 09:42:13 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

I, James Meier, CEO and CFO, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K-SB of Meier Worldwide
Intermedia, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;


4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:


a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;


b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and


c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and


b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



14th February, 2006 (date)           /s/  James  Meier
--------------------------           -------------------
                                     James  Meier
                                     Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                                     Chief  Financial  Officer