alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 121.687 Dispatch release: Flag and domestic operations. ( a ) The dispatch release may be in any form but must contain at least the following information concerning each flight: ( 1 ) Identification number of the aircraft.
( 2 ) Trip number.
( 3 ) Departure airport, intermediate stops, destination airports, and alternate airports.
( 4 ) A statement of the type of operation (e.g., IFR, VFR).
( 5 ) Minimum fuel supply.
( 6 ) For each flight dispatched as an ETOPS flight, the ETOPS diversion time for which the flight is dispatched.
( b ) The dispatch release must contain, or have attached to it, weather reports, available weather forecasts, or a combination thereof, for the destination airport, intermediate stops, and alternate airports, that are the latest available at the time the release is signed by the pilot in command and dispatcher. It may include any additional available weather reports or forecasts that the pilot in command or the aircraft dispatcher considers necessary or desirable.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19226, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-329, 72 FR 1883, Jan. 16, 2007]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Transmittal of Abbreviated Supplemental Record to the Court of Appeals 

DATE: May 7, 2018 

 

DC #: 17-BK-3283 (LTS) PROMESA 

 

USCA #: Re: 2897 NOA 

 

CASE CAPTION: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, as representative of The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al. 

 

SPECIAL COMMENTS: Electronically filed documents 

INDEX OF DOCUMENTS INCLUDED AS A SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD ON APPEAL:

DOCUMENTS: VOLUMES: 

Docket Entry 3015 I 

 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed documents contained herein are the pleadings as described above 

and constitute the abbreviated supplemental record on appeal in the case. 

 

 FRANCES RIOS DE MORAN 

 Clerk of the Court 

 S/ Marian B. Ramirez-Rivera 

 Marian B. Ramirez-Rivera 

 Deputy Clerk 

s/c: CM/ECF Parties, Appeals Clerk 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3030 Filed:05/07/18 Entered:05/07/18 17:09:17 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Public Hearing on NPRM MDE Rule 

May 8, 2012

• Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to 

establish standards for accessible

medical diagnostic equipment.

• Comment period closes on

June 8, 2012
Hearing Procedures

• Registered speakers may speak for 5 

minutes each

• After all registered speakers have 

presented, there will be an open 

microphone session for others to testify

• Notify staff at the registration desk if you 

want to testify and have not preregistered

• Please turn off or silence your cell phone
Hearing Procedures

• Transcript will be kept and will be entered 

into the docket

• Written remarks or PowerPoint shows 

should be given to the staff at the 

registration desk

• Refrain from reacting publicly to witness 

presentations or Board member 

statements
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quartely Report of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis McGuire, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | /s/  DENNISMCGUIRE     
| | Dennis McGuire,        
| | Chief Executive Officer





Date:  November 14, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### FRANK TEREAU v. A. M. MADISON.2

January 26, 1917.

Nos. 20,105—(224).

Motion to vacate attachment — burden of proof.

Upon a motion, based on affidavits putting in issue the alleged facts on which a writ of attachment was issued, to vacate the writ, the burden is upon plaintiff to sustain the allegations of the original affidavit. The plaintiff having failed to do this, the court properly vacated the writ. [Reporter.]

Action in the district court for Polk county. Defendant obtained an *470order requiring plaintiff to show cause why a writ of attachment should not, be vacated and why the property seized thereunder should not be released. From an order, Watts, J„ vacating the attachment and releasing a gray mare seized under it, plaintiff appealed.

Affirmed.

*J. A. Hendricks,*for appellant.

*W. E. Rowe,*for respondent.

2

Reported in 160 N. W. 1024.

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover money upon contract. The plaintiff procured a writ of attachment. In his affidavit he alleged as grounds for the writ, that the defendant “has assigned, secreted, disposed of his property with intent to delay and defraud his creditors, and is about to dispose of the rest of his property, with the same intent.”

Under this writ the sheriff seized one gray mare belonging to the defendant; the defendant procured an order to show cause why the writ should not be vacated and the property released. Upon the hearing the matter was submitted upon affidavits filed by the defendant, traversing and putting in issue the allegations of the affidavit for the writ, counter affidavits of the plaintiff and the pleadings and files.

The court made ah order vacating the writ and dissolving the levy, from which order the plaintiff appealed.

Upon a motion to vacate a writ of attachment, based upon affidavits putting in issue the alleged facts upon which the writ was issued, the burden is upon the plaintiff to sustain the allegations of the original affiidavit, by competent evidence. Jones v. Swank, 51 Minn. 285, 53 N. W. 634. This the plaintiff failed to do. We are of the opinion the order of the district court was right.

Order affirmed.
EXHIBIT G

STAFFING PLAN

Category of Timekeeper

Number of Timekeepers 

Expected to Work on the 

Matter During the Budget 

Period

Average Hourly 

Rate

Partner/Principal 2 $825.00

Executive Director 1 $769.00

Senior Manager 2 $685.00

Manager 2 $564.00

Senior 3 $425.00

Staff 3 $231.00

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2780-7 Filed:03/21/18 Entered:03/21/18 16:55:31 Desc:

Exhibit G Page 1 of 1
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3723

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

8135 Forest Lane in Dallas, Texas, as the ‘‘Vaughn Gross Post Office 

Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2004

Mr. SESSIONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 8135 Forest Lane in Dallas, Texas, as the 

‘‘Vaughn Gross Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VAUGHN GROSS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 8135 Forest Lane in Dallas, 

6 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Vaughn 

7 Gross Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2

•HR 3723 IH 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Vaughn Gross Post 

3 Office Building.

Æ
§ 25.1365 Electrical appliances, motors, and transformers. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 68735 , Aug. 27, 2024.
( a ) Domestic appliances must be designed and installed so that in the event of failures of the electrical supply or control system, the requirements of § 25.1309(b), (c), and (d) will be satisfied. Domestic appliances are items such as cooktops, ovens, coffee makers, water heaters, refrigerators, and toilet flush systems that are placed on the airplane to provide service amenities to passengers.
( b ) Galleys and cooking appliances must be installed in a way that minimizes risk of overheat or fire.
( c ) Domestic appliances, particularly those in galley areas, must be installed or protected so as to prevent damage or contamination of other equipment or systems from fluids or vapors which may be present during normal operation or as a result of spillage, if such damage or contamination could create a hazardous condition.
( d ) Unless compliance with § 25.1309(b) is provided by the circuit protective device required by § 25.1357(a), electric motors and transformers, including those installed in domestic systems, must have a suitable thermal protection device to prevent overheating under normal operation and failure conditions, if overheating could create a smoke or fire hazard.
[Amdt. 25-123, 72 FR 63406, Nov. 8, 2007]
Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) has agreed to grant overhead trackage rights to The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) over UP's rail line between Stockton, CA, in the vicinity of UP's milepost 82.3 (Fresno Subdivision), and Fresno, CA, in the vicinity of UP's milepost 207.0 (Fresno Subdivision). BNSF will operate its own trains with its own crews over UP's line under the trackage rights agreement.[1] 

The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or shortly after January 15, 2000. 

The purpose of the trackage rights is to allow BNSF to operate over an alternate line while BNSF's lines are undergoing maintenance and repair. 

                    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in                     *Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.—Trackage Rights—BN*, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as modified in                     *Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.-Lease and Operate*, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980).                 

                    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void                     *ab initio*. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.                 

An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 33833, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be served on Yolanda Grimes Brown, Esq., The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, P.O. Box 961039, Fort Worth, TX 76161-0039. 

Board decisions and notices are available on our website at “WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.”

Decided: January 11, 2000. 

By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings. 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary. 

# Footnotes

1.                             On December 29, 1999, BNSF and UP filed a petition for exemption in STB Finance Docket No. 33833 (Sub-No. 1),                         *The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company—Trackage Rights Exemption—Union Pacific Railroad Company*, wherein BNSF and UP request that the Board permit the proposed overhead trackage rights arrangement described in the present proceeding to expire on February 7, 2000. That petition will be addressed by the Board in a separate decision.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-1079 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.35 Flight tests. ( a ) Each applicant for an aircraft type certificate (other than under §§ 21.24 through 21.29) must make the tests listed in paragraph (b) of this section. Before making the tests the applicant must show— ( 1 ) Compliance with the applicable structural requirements of this subchapter;
( 2 ) Completion of necessary ground inspections and tests;
( 3 ) That the aircraft conforms with the type design; and
( 4 ) That the FAA received a flight test report from the applicant (signed, in the case of aircraft to be certificated under Part 25 [New] of this chapter, by the applicant's test pilot) containing the results of his tests.
( b ) Upon showing compliance with paragraph (a) of this section, the applicant must make all flight tests that the FAA finds necessary— ( 1 ) To determine compliance with the applicable requirements of this subchapter; and
( 2 ) For aircraft to be certificated under this subchapter, except gliders and low-speed, certification level 1 or 2 airplanes, as defined in part 23 of this chapter, to determine whether there is reasonable assurance that the aircraft, its components, and its equipment are reliable and function properly.
( c ) Each applicant must, if practicable, make the tests prescribed in paragraph (b)(2) of this section upon the aircraft that was used to show compliance with— ( 1 ) Paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and
( 2 ) For rotorcraft, the rotor drive endurance tests prescribed in § 27.923 or § 29.923 of this chapter, as applicable.
( d ) Each applicant must show for each flight test (except in a glider or a manned free balloon) that adequate provision is made for the flight test crew for emergency egress and the use of parachutes.
( e ) Except in gliders and manned free balloons, an applicant must discontinue flight tests under this section until he shows that corrective action has been taken, whenever— ( 1 ) The applicant's test pilot is unable or unwilling to make any of the required flight tests; or
( 2 ) Items of noncompliance with requirements are found that may make additional test data meaningless or that would make further testing unduly hazardous.
( f ) The flight tests prescribed in paragraph (b)(2) of this section must include— ( 1 ) For aircraft incorporating turbine engines of a type not previously used in a type certificated aircraft, at least 300 hours of operation with a full complement of engines that conform to a type certificate; and
( 2 ) For all other aircraft, at least 150 hours of operation.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14564, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-40, 39 FR 35459, Oct. 1, 1974; Amdt. 21-51, 45 FR 60170, Sept. 11, 1980; Amdt. 21-70, 57 FR 41368, Sept. 9, 1992; Amdt. 21-95, 76 FR 64233, Oct. 18, 2011; Doc. No. FAA-2015-1621, Amdt. 21-100, 81 FR 96689, Dec. 30, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 183
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 183.47 Qualifications. To qualify for consideration as an ODA, the applicant must— ( a ) Have sufficient facilities, resources, and personnel, to perform the functions for which authorization is requested;
( b ) Have sufficient experience with FAA requirements, processes, and procedures to perform the functions for which authorization is requested; and
( c ) Have sufficient, relevant experience to perform the functions for which authorization is requested.
# Official Journal L 324/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.324.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 324 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5522 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.324.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 324

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5522 November 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1081/2012 of 9 November 2012 for the purposes of Council Regulation (EC) No 116/2009 on the export of cultural goods | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1082/2012 of 9 November 2012 amending Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 in respect of EU aviation security validation (1) | 25 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1081/2012 of 9 November 2012 for the purposes of Council Regulation (EC) No 116/2009 on the export of cultural goods

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1082/2012 of 9 November 2012 amending Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 in respect of EU aviation security validation (1)

25

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
From File C:\EPAWork\wordpro\MN\MN taconinte\ProUCL\ArcelorMittal.wst

Full Precision OFF

Confidence Coefficient 0.95

Number of Valid Observations 165

Number of Distinct Observations 150

Minimum 2.72

Maximum 14.66

Mean of Raw Data 8.674

Standard Deviation of Raw Data 2.178

Kstar 13.75

Mean of Log Transformed Data 2.124

Standard Deviation of Log Transformed Data 0.283

Correlation Coefficient R 0.995

Approximate Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.981

Approximate Shapiro Wilk P Value 0.465

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0704

Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.069

Correlation Coefficient R 0.983

A-D Test Statistic 1.817

A-D Critical (0.95) Value 0.751

K-S Test Statistic 0.103

K-S Critical(0.95) Value 0.0726

Correlation Coefficient R 0.966

Approximate Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.932

Approximate Shapiro Wilk P Value 4.4064E-9

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.115

Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.069

Number of Valid Observations 121

Number of Distinct Observations 110

Minimum 1.61
Maximum 10.45

Mean of Raw Data 6.538

Standard Deviation of Raw Data 1.939

Kstar 9.065

Mean of Log Transformed Data 1.823

Standard Deviation of Log Transformed Data 0.358

Correlation Coefficient R 0.995

Approximate Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.973

Approximate Shapiro Wilk P Value 0.161

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0457

Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.0805

Correlation Coefficient R 0.972

A-D Test Statistic 1.517

A-D Critical (0.95) Value 0.752

K-S Test Statistic 0.0855

K-S Critical(0.95) Value 0.084

Correlation Coefficient R 0.949

Approximate Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.895

Approximate Shapiro Wilk P Value 5.211E-12

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0999

Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.0805

Number of Valid Observations 54

Number of Distinct Observations 52

Minimum 2.02

Maximum 11.7

Mean of Raw Data 5.6

Standard Deviation of Raw Data 1.799

Kstar 8.575

Mean of Log Transformed Data 1.667

Standard Deviation of Log Transformed Data 0.354

Correlation Coefficient R 0.979

Approximate Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.967

Approximate Shapiro Wilk P Value 0.276

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0997
Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.121

Correlation Coefficient R 0.981

A-D Test Statistic 0.806

A-D Critical (0.95) Value 0.751

K-S Test Statistic 0.113

K-S Critical(0.95) Value 0.121

Correlation Coefficient R 0.966

Approximate Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.935

Approximate Shapiro Wilk P Value 0.00824

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.129

Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.121

Number of Valid Observations 165

Number of Distinct Observations 142

Minimum 0

Maximum 9.96

Mean of Raw Data 4.538

Standard Deviation of Raw Data 1.715

Correlation Coefficient R 0.976

Approximate Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.95

Approximate Shapiro Wilk P Value 2.0101E-5

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0991

Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.069
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (a) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (a) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ronald E. Klingle  
|Ronald E. Klingle      
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 20, 2007         



22