alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019036EN.01000401.xml

| 29.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 January 2019

(2019/C 36/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1418 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4652 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86888 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3503 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1331 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 136,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7320 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,726 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 317,53 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2861 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7646 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,0534 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5913 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5115 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9586 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6687 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5455 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 277,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5862 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6997 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4273 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 056,62 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6938 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,956 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,3804 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,024 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2872 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7271 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,2320 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1418

JPY

Japanese yen

124,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4652

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86888

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3503

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1331

ISK

Iceland króna

136,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7320

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,726

HUF

Hungarian forint

317,53

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2861

RON

Romanian leu

4,7646

TRY

Turkish lira

6,0534

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5913

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5115

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9586

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6687

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5455

KRW

South Korean won

1 277,22

ZAR

South African rand

15,5862

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6997

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4273

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 056,62

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6938

PHP

Philippine peso

59,956

RUB

Russian rouble

75,3804

THB

Thai baht

36,024

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2872

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7271

INR

Indian rupee

81,2320

---

(1)  
  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
§ 603.320 Disclosure of requested information to individuals. ( a ) The Privacy Act Officer shall, within a reasonable period of time after the date of receipt of a request for information of records: ( 1 ) Determine whether or not such request shall be granted,
( 2 ) Notify the requester of the determination and, if the request is denied, of the reasons therefor, and
( 3 ) Notify the requester that fees for reproducing copies of records may be charged as provided in § 603.345 of this part.
( b ) If access to a record is denied because the information therein has been compiled by the Farm Credit Administration in reasonable anticipation of a civil or criminal action proceeding, the Privacy Act Officer shall notify the requester of that person's right to judicial appeal under 5 U.S.C. 552a(g).
( c ) ( 1 ) If access to a record is granted, the requester shall notify the Officer whether the requested record is to be copied and mailed to the requester or whether the record is to be made available for personal inspection.
( 2 ) A requester who is an individual may be accompanied by an individual selected by the requester when the record is disclosed, in which case the requester may be required to furnish a written statement authorizing the discussion of the record in the presence of the accompanying person.
( d ) If the record is to be made available for personal inspection, the requester shall arrange with the Privacy Act Officer a mutually agreeable time in the offices of the Farm Credit Administration for inspection of the record.
[40 FR 40454, Sept. 2, 1975, as amended at 51 FR 41941, Nov. 20, 1986]
# Official Journal C 67/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 67 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6220 February 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 67

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6220 February 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | European Central Bank |
| 2019/C 67/01 ECB/2019/6 | Recommendation of the European Central Bank of 14 February 2019 to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Banque centrale du Luxembourg (ECB/2019/6) | 1 |

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RECOMMENDATIONS

European Central Bank

2019/C 67/01 ECB/2019/6

Recommendation of the European Central Bank of 14 February 2019 to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Banque centrale du Luxembourg (ECB/2019/6)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2019/C 67/02 | Council Decision of 18 February 2019 appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Greece | 2 |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 67/03 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2019/C 67/02

Council Decision of 18 February 2019 appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Greece

2

European Commission

2019/C 67/03

Euro exchange rates

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 67/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9267 — KKR/Telepizza) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 67/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9267 — KKR/Telepizza) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,619
<PP&E>                                          24,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,058
<BONDS>                                         15,228
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,172
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,066)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,752
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,048
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,009
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,590)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,428)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,162)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,815)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.91)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Corey E. Shaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


March 24, 2003                          /s/ Corey E. Shaker
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Corey E. Shaker
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony Jurak, the Chief
Executive Officer and principal financial officer of Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc.
(the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended May 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|Date: September 23, 2005 |  | Signed: /s/ Anthony Jurak                                      | 
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                         |  |                                                               
|                         |  | Name: Anthony Jurak                                            | 
|                         |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as
separate desclosure documents. A signed original of this written statement has
been provided to Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. and will be retained by
Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00096-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

V.

ANTHONY CHRISTOPHER 

MERITO

APPELLEE

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF WICHITA COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 61,952-F

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “State’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The 

motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 9, 2015
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

TheBoard of Directors

Cardinal Financial Corporation:

**Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.333-106694 on Form S-8 dated July 1, 2003, registration statement No.333-111672 on Form S-8 dated December 31, 2003, registration statement No.333-111673 on Form S-8 dated December 31, 2003, registration statement No. 333-127395on Form S-8 dated August 10, 2005, registration statement No. 333-134923on Form S-8 dated June 9, 2006, and registration statement No. 333-134934on Form S-8 dated June 9, 2006 of Cardinal Financial Corporation andsubsidiaries (the Company) of our reports dated March 15, 2007, with respect tothe consolidated statements of condition of the Company as of December 31, 2006and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensiveincome, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of Decmeber 31,2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006, annual report on Form10-K of the Company.**

/s/ KPMG LLP

McLean,Virginia

March 15, 2007

----
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

TS-ZF02NT

Continuation pages 

PMN Pages 8 – Section II.A.1.a 

- 1 - 

PMN Page 8 – Section II.A.1.a Other Manufacturing Sites 

{

 }

PMN Page 8 – Section II.A.1.a Other Processing Sites 

{

 }
#### NORMAN v. THE STATE.

(Decided January 14th, 1915.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. S. E. Greene.

No counsel marked for appellant. Robert C. Brick-ell, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
#### AMERICAN TOBACCO CO. v. UNITED STATES

[76 C.Cls. 201; 290 U.S. 669]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court, October 16, 1933.
#### GRIFFIN v. THE STATE.

(Decided February 2nd, 1915.)

Appeal from Houston Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

E. H. Hill, for appellant. Robert C. Brickell, Attorney General, for tbe State.

Per curiam.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 29, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED MARCH 29, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                             760
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      953
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,973
<PP&E>                                          24,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,757
<BONDS>                                          3,518
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,632
<SALES>                                         23,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,500
<CGS>                                            6,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    758
<INCOME-TAX>                                       224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                534
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       534
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
#### Harris *v.*The State.

*Murder,*

(Decided June 1, 1915.

69 South. 344.)

1. *Evidence; Bes Gestae.*— A statement by deceased to bystanders, after running out of the room where he had received the fatal knife wound from defendant, “Boys, see how bad he has cut me,” was part of the res gestee, and properly admitted.

2. *Same.*— Where the cutting was not denied, the admission of such a statement by deceased was not prejudicial.

*90Appeal from Limestone Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. D. W. Speaks.

Ed Harris Aims convicted of manslaughter and he appeals.

Affirmed.

W. R. Walker, for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and W. H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

THOMAS, J.

(1) The record presents only one question, and this arises out of the action of the court in overruling- the objection and exception of the defendant to the testimony of the state’s witness John Bailey as to a statement made to Avitness and others by deceased after the latter received the fatal knife Avound at defendant’s hands', AAffiich statement was as follows: “Boys, see Iioav bad he has cut me.” It appears that the difficulty commenced in a room at a livery stable where the deceased and the defendant and the witness and others were at the time; that ■ during the quarrel in there between deceased and defendant the former thmv a vaseline bottle at defendant, Avhereupon defendant immediately drew his knife, and that as he did so, and before the cutting was done, the Avitness and the others present, except defendant and deceased, ran out of the room, leaving the tAVO' inside; that a Avhile thereafter (about a minute, so another AAdtness testifies) the defendant came running out of the door, being followed by deceased, Avho upon reaching Avitness and the others at the (loor said: “Boys, see how bad he (meaning- defendant) has cut me.” Evidence of this statement was clearly admissible as a part of the res *gestae.*—Nelson *v. State,*130 Ala. 83, 30 728.

*91
      (2) Besides, even if it were not, there was no injury in admitting it, as defendant does not deny that he did the cutting and that such cutting resulted in the death of deceased. Defendant sought only to show that he acted in self-defense in doing the cutting, and not that he did not do the cutting. Hence the statement attributed to deceased was, in practical effect, admitted to be true by defendant.

Affirmed.
§ 171.7 Performance requirements. ( a ) The VOR must perform in accordance with the “International Standards and Recommended Practices, Aeronautical Telecommunications,” Part I, paragraph 3.3 (Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation), except that part of paragraph 3.3.2.1 specifying a radio frequency tolerance of 0.005 percent, and that part of paragraph 3.3.7 requiring removal of only the bearing information. In place thereof, the frequency tolerance of the radio frequency carrier must not exceed plus or minus 0.002 percent, and all radiation must be removed during the specified deviations from established conditions and during periods of monitor failure.
( b ) Ground inspection consists of an examination of the design features of the equipment to determine that there will not be conditions that will allow unsafe operations because of component failure or deterioration.
( c ) The monitor is checked periodi- cally, during the in-service test evaluation period, for calibration and stability The tests are made with a standard “Reference and variable phase signal generator” and associated test equipment, including an oscilloscope and portable field detector. In general, the ground check is conducted in accord- ance with section 8.4 of FAA Handbook AF P 6790.9 “Maintenance Instruction for VHF Omniranges”, adapted for the facility concerned.
( d ) Flight tests to determine the facility's adequacy for operational requirements and compliance with applicable “Standards and Recommended Practices” are conducted in accordance with the “U.S. Standard Flight Inspection Manual”, particularly section 201.
( e ) After January 1, 1975, the owner of the VOR shall modify the facility to perform in accordance with paragraph 3.3.5.7 of Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation within 180 days after receipt of notice from the Administrator that 50 kHz channel spacing is to be implemented in the area and that a requirement exists for suppression of 9960 Hz subcarrier harmonics.
[Doc. No. 5034, 29 FR 11337, Aug. 6, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 171-7, 35 FR 12711, Aug. 11, 1970; Amdt. 171-9, 38 FR 28557, Oct. 15, 1973]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTRY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,962
<PP&E>                                          57,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,881
<BONDS>                                            190
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     21,021
<COMMON>                                        28,761
<OTHER-SE>                                     (51,992)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,155
<SALES>                                        126,601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,601
<CGS>                                          112,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,721
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,621
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,621
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49


</TABLE>
# L_2008260EN.01S00301.xml

| 30.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 260/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 260/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---