alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of aQuantive, Inc. (the "COMPANY") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "FORM 10-Q"), I, M. Wayne Wisehart,
the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 9, 2006

                                        /s/ M. WAYNE WISEHART
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            M. Wayne Wisehart
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                       31
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, 

As representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.

Debtors1.

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17-CV-01578-LTS

Case No. 17-03283

 (Joint Administration Requested)

NOTICE OF NO APPOINTMENT OF OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF 

UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR PUERTO RICO SALES 

TAX FINANCING CORPORATION (COFINA) 

Pursuant to section 1102(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, made applicable to these 

proceedings by section 301 of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability 

Act of 2016 or “PROMESA”, Guy G. Gebhardt, Acting United States Trustee for Region 21 

reports he will not appoint an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in case no. 17-BK03284 (COFINA’s Title III Case) at this time.

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective bankruptcy case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation 

(“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); 

(iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); and (iv) Employees Retirement System 

of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686). Case Nos. 17 BK 3283-LTS and 17 BK 

3284-LTS are jointly administered by order of the court.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:339 Filed:06/15/17 Entered:06/15/17 07:48:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
DATED: June 15, 2017

GUY G. GEBHARDT

Acting United States Trustee for Region 21

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE

Edificio Ochoa

500 Tanca Street, Suite 301

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901-1922

Tel.: (787) 729-7444

Fax: (787) 729-7449

(Electronically Filed)

By: s/ Monsita Lecaroz-Arribas

Monsita Lecaroz-Arribas

Assistant U.S. Trustee

USDC-PR No. 207707

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:339 Filed:06/15/17 Entered:06/15/17 07:48:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
## SNAP This Proposed Rule Makingwould be extremely damagingto small family owned businesses such as ours

There is no economical replacementfor blowing agents currently in use

The switch to alternatives would not only raise the cost of products but would saddle the walk-in cooler/freezer companies, many ofwhich are small privately held businesses, such as ours, with huge investments in testing and equipmentwhich would put many of us out of business
Further, the cost ofour products would rise significantly hurting our customers, many ofwhom are independent restaurants and grocery stores

### This ruling should be postponed ordelayed until a viable alternative blowing agent is commercially available This proposed rule making may also impact our industries abilityto complywith the DOE regulations recently enacted
§ 170.13 Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) establishment criteria. ( a ) The following criteria along with general facility establishment standards must be met before an airport can qualify for an ATCT: ( 1 ) The airport, whether publicly or privately owned, must be open to and available for use by the public as defined in the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982;
( 2 ) The airport must be recognized by and contained within the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems;
( 3 ) The airport owners/authorities must have entered into appropriate assurances and covenants to guarantee that the airport will continue in operation for a long enough period to permit the amortization of the ATCT investment;
( 4 ) The FAA must be furnished appropriate land without cost for construction of the ATCT; and
( 5 ) The airport must meet the benefit-cost ratio criteria specified herein utilizing three consecutive FAA annual counts and projections of future traffic during the expected life of the tower facility. (An FAA annual count is a fiscal year or a calendar year activity summary. Where actual traffic counts are unavailable or not recorded, adequately documented FAA estimates of the scheduled and nonscheduled activity may be used.)
( b ) An airport meets the establishment criteria when it satisfies paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5) of this section and its benefit-cost ratio equals or exceeds one. As defined in § 170.3 of this part, the benefit-cost ratio is the ratio of the present value of the ATCT life cycle benefits (BPV) to the present value of ATCT life cycle costs (CPV). BPV/CPV≥1.0
( c ) The satisfaction of all the criteria listed in this section does not guarantee that the airport will receive an ATCT.
```

[Federal Register: August 24, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 163)]
[Notices]               
[Page 52058]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24au10-113]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee-Public 
Teleconference

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee 
Teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a 
teleconference of the Space Transportation Operations Working Group 
(STOWG) of the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee 
(COMSTAC). The teleconference will take place on Friday, September 17, 
2010, starting at 11 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time. Individuals who plan 
to participate should contact Susan Lender, DFO, (the Contact Person 
listed below) by phone or e-mail for the teleconference call in number.
    The proposed agenda for this teleconference is to continue the 
group's review of the Concept of Operation for Global Space Vehicle 
Debris Threat Management report. This is one of the action items from 
the May 19, 2010 meeting held at the National Housing Center, 1201 15th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
    Interested members of the public may submit relevant written 
statements for the COMSTAC members to consider under the advisory 
process. Statements may concern the issues and agenda items mentioned 
above or additional issues that may be relevant for the U.S. commercial 
space transportation industry. Interested parties wishing to submit 
written statements should contact Susan Lender, DFO, (the Contact 
Person listed below) in writing (mail or e-mail) by September 10,2010, 
so that the information can be made available to COMSTAC members for 
their review and consideration before the September 17, 2010, 
teleconference. Written statements should be supplied in the following 
formats: one hard copy with original signature or one electronic copy 
via e-mail.
    An agenda will be posted on the FAA Web site at http://www.faa.gov/go/ast.
    Individuals who plan to participate and need special assistance 
should inform the Contact Person listed below in advance of the 
meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lender (AST-100), Office of 
Commercial Space Transportation (AST), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Room 331, Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-8029; e-mail 
susan.lender@faa.gov. Complete information regarding COMSTAC is 
available on the FAA Web site at: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/advisory_committee/.

    Issued in Washington, DC on August 13, 2010.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2010-20520 Filed 8-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
§ 1212.703 NASA Chief Information Officer. ( a ) The NASA Chief Information Officer is responsible for the following: ( 1 ) Providing overall supervision and coordination of NASA's policies and procedures under this regulation;
( 2 ) Approving system notices for publication in the Federal Register;
( 3 ) Assuring that NASA employees and officials are informed of their responsibilities and that they receive appropriate training for the implementation of these requirments; and,
( 4 ) Preparing and submitting the biennial report on implementation of the Privacy Act to OMB and special reports required under this regulation, including establishing appropriate reporting procedures in accordance with OMB Circular No. A-130.
( b ) The Chief Information Officer may establish a position of ‘NASA Privacy Act Officer,’designate someone to function as such an officer, and delegate to that officer any of the functions described in paragraph (a) of this section.
[57 FR 4928, Feb. 11, 1992. Redesignated and amended at 77 FR 60622, Oct. 4, 2012]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3940 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain amounts 

from the tested income of controlled foreign corporations, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2020 

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

certain amounts from the tested income of controlled 

foreign corporations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Territorial Economic 

5 Recovery Act’’. 


ctelli on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3940 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCOME OF CERTAIN QUALIFIED POSSESSION COR2 PORATIONS EXCLUDED FROM TESTED IN3 COME. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 951A of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (c)(2)(A)(i), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

7 at the end of subclause (IV), by striking ‘‘over’’ at 

8 the end of subclause (V) and inserting ‘‘and’’, and 

9 by adding at the end the following new subclause: 

10 ‘‘(VI) any income of a qualified 

11 possession corporation that is effec12 tively connected with the active con13 duct of a trade or business within a 

14 possession of the United States, 

15 over’’; and 

16 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub17 sections: 

18 ‘‘(g) POSSESSION OF THE UNITED STATES.—For 

19 purposes of this section, the term ‘possession of the United 

20 States’ means Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and any 

21 specified possession described in section 931(c). 

22 ‘‘(h) QUALIFIED POSSESSION CORPORATION.—For 

23 purposes of this section, the term ‘qualified possession cor24 poration’ means any controlled foreign corporation for any 

25 taxable year, if, for the 3-year period (or the period during 

26 which the controlled foreign corporation has been in existVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:45 Jun 26, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3940.IS S3940

ctelli on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3940 IS

1 ence, if shorter) ending in the taxable year preceding the 

2 taxable year in which the determination is made— 

3 ‘‘(1) 80 percent or more of the gross income of 

4 such corporation was derived from sources within a 

5 possession of the United States, and 

6 ‘‘(2) 75 percent or more of the gross income of 

7 such corporation was effectively connected with the 

8 active conduct of a trade or business within a pos9 session of the United States.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply taxable years of foreign corpora12 tions beginning after December 31, 2019, and to taxable 

13 years of United States shareholders in which or with which 

14 such taxable years of foreign corporations end. 

Æ 


ctelli on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
#### ANDREWS V. THE STATE.

(Decided November 27, 1913.)

Appeal from Chambers Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. S. L. Brewer.

James W. Strother, and C. S. Moon, for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Thomas, J.

No error.

Affirmed.
§ 27.337 Limit maneuvering load factor. The rotorcraft must be designed for— ( a ) A limit maneuvering load factor ranging from a positive limit of 3.5 to a negative limit of −1.0; or
( b ) Any positive limit maneuvering load factor not less than 2.0 and any negative limit maneuvering load factor of not less than −0.5 for which— ( 1 ) The probability of being exceeded is shown by analysis and flight tests to be extremely remote; and
( 2 ) The selected values are appropriate to each weight condition between the design maximum and design minimum weights.
[Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 7999, Mar. 6, 1990]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 20-0022

ORDER FOR SECOND EXTENSION

OF TIME FOR APPELLANT TO

FILE OPENING BRIEF

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the Appellant to file his

opening brief is extended to May 20, 2020.

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW

cc: Montana Attorney General Tim Fox, Attorney for Appellee

Lowy Lawy, Attorney for Appellant

ERIC VALLEJO,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE

MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION,

Respondent and Appellee.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 21 2020

04/21/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0022
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints C. Stanley Bailey, C. Marvin Scott and Rick D.
Gardner, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with
full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and
all capacities, to sign on his behalf, Superior Financial Corp, Inc.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.

     Hereby executed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on
January 20, 2000 in Fort Smith, Arkansas.


/s/ C. Stanley Bailey                   Chairman of the Board
-----------------------------           and Chief Executive Officer
C. Stanley Bailey



/s/ Brian A. Gahr                       Director
-----------------------------
Brian A. Gahr



/s/ Boyd W. Hendrickson                 Director
-----------------------------
Boyd W. Hendrickson



/s/ Howard McMahon                      Director
----------------------------
Howard McMahon



/s/ C. Marvin Scott                     Director
----------------------------
C. Marvin Scott



/s/ Ben Scroggin, Jr.                   Director
----------------------------
Ben Scroggin, Jr.



/s/ John E. Steuri                      Director
----------------------------
John E. Steuri

<PAGE>

/s/ John M. Stein                       Director
----------------------------
John M. Stein



/s/ David E. Stubblefield               Director
----------------------------
David E. Stubblefield
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.aa

                               GAS SUPPLY CONTRACT

Party A: Proton Enterprises (Wuhan) Ltd. (Hereinafter Party A)
Party B: Construction headquarters of Zunyi Municipal Government (Hereinafter
Party b)

Based on the Article No. 12 of the contract signed on March 2, 2002, Party A and
B agree to sign this supply contract for the pipeline system installed for the
1023 households in the residential area with the terms and conditions as
follows.

     1.   Party A guarantees that Party A or its entrusted (Party A) company
          will supply LPG for the above system in a safe and timely manner. To
          be specific, Party A will deliver cylinders by truck to the supply
          workshop and will provide the safety insurance (if the insurance
          company agrees) for every end user.
     2.   Supply price: Party agrees to provide Party B LPG according to the
          market wholesales price.
     3.   Confirmation of the quantity: Upon delivery, the staffs from both
          parties should verify the quantity by weighing the 50kg cylinders and
          when LPG is used up, the staffs have to weigh the cylinders again. The
          difference is the actual amount used.
     4.   Payment: Party B should pay Party A immediately upon the confirmation
          of the amount on such formula: Amount X unit market price of that day.
     5.   Party A should provide Party B with "LPG Users' Manual", for the
          commonsense and safety knowledge of the users.
     6.   Party A will send technicians free of charge to guide, support and
          train Party B's staffs in the operation, management and maintenance of
          the system.
     7.   Party B should appoint two staffs to be in charge of this system.
     8.   Party B agrees to pay the due right on spot or otherwise agrees to pay
          15% more of what is due then as penalty.
     9.   Party B guarantees that as soon as this agreement is signed, it should
          not negotiate with the third party for the gas supply.
     10.  Party B guarantees that the management of the system changes, the
          liability and responsibility of this contract should be transferred
          into the new successor.
     11.  Contract breaching: If Party A breaches the contract, Party B can
          refuse to pay for the LPG used, but can't stop the supply. Or
          otherwise it will be responsible for all consequences. If Party B
          breaches the contract, Party A can stop the supply and ask from Party
          B for all economic consequences.
     12.  The contract will be valid for 40 years from the date it is signed.
     13.  Any dispute should be settled through Shenzhen Arbitration Committee.


Party A:                                             Party B:

Legal Representative:                                Legal Representative

Add. Bldg. 11, Xudong Rd. Wuchange
# Official Journal L 3/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.003.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 3 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 546 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.003.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 3

English edition

Legislation

Volume 546 January 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 4/2011 of 4 January 2011 establishing a prohibition of fishing for saithe in VI; EU and international waters of Vb, XII and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Spain | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 5/2011 of 5 January 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 3 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 6/2011 of 5 January 2011 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EU) No 867/2010 for the 2010/11 marketing year | 5 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/2/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 5 January 2011 terminating the examination procedure concerning the measures imposed by Brazil affecting the import of textile products | 7 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 4/2011 of 4 January 2011 establishing a prohibition of fishing for saithe in VI; EU and international waters of Vb, XII and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Spain

1

Commission Regulation (EU) No 5/2011 of 5 January 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

3

Commission Regulation (EU) No 6/2011 of 5 January 2011 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EU) No 867/2010 for the 2010/11 marketing year

5

DECISIONS

2011/2/EU

*

Commission Decision of 5 January 2011 terminating the examination procedure concerning the measures imposed by Brazil affecting the import of textile products

7

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.