alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CRANE *v.*HALFORD.

Error — payment to an agent — bill of exceptions.

Payment to an authorized agent is payment to the principal.

A court of error will only look at those facts whiGh the bill of exceptions actually places upon the record.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas. Halford sued Crane in the court below for money had and received, paid, &c. Upon non assumpsit joined, Halford offered to prove the contents of a lost paper, purporting to be a receipt from one Green for $,“35 17, in full of an award in favor of Green *v.*Crane, of prior date to the receipt. To this it was objected, that the receipt was not competent without proof of Green’s authority from Crane, and that Green was not a competent witness to prove the payment. The court decided that the evidence was admissible if the plaintiff proved a *request*to pay by Crane. This was assigned for error.

Br the Court.

The simple question in this case is, whether payment to a third person, *authorized*to receive the money, will discharge the demand. There can bé no doubt it will. If the bill of exceptions was designed to raise any other question, it has failed of its object. We can only look to the matters of fact which by it are in fact placed upon the record."

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION — PLEADING.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

January Term, 1898.]

Cox, Swing and Smith, JJ.

#### John Wentzel v. Eliza Hayes et al.

1. Widow Entitled to Homestead though not having Care and Maintenance of Minor Child.

A widow is entitled to homestead exemption, under sec. 5441, Rev. Stat., although not having the care, maintenance and custody of a minor child.

2. Mortgage oe Part oe Homestead Exemption, Effect of.

A mortgage given by a widow on her eight-twelfths of land does not preclude her from asserting her homestead exemption out of the judgment and mortgage which she held against the two-twelfths interest of others.

3. Court may Refuse Plea that Judgment is Void for Want of Service, When. ■'

Where it does not affirmatively appear that service on an answer and cross-petition was not waived or appearance entered, the court may refuse, after judgment, to permit an answer, claiming such judgment was void for want of such service.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

Swing, J.

We think the judgment of the court of common pleas should be affirmed.

Eliza Hayes was entitled under sec. 5441, Rev. Stat., to the homestead exemption therein allowed. She was a widow, and as such she was entitled to the homestead exemption, although not having in good faith the care, maintenance and custody of a minor child. These provisions do not apply to a widow.

The mortgage given by her in this case on her interest of eight-twelfths of the land does not preclude her from asserting her homestead *757exemption out of the judgment and mortgage which she held against the two-twelfths interest of others.

*John Wentzel,*for the plaintiff in error.

*James B. Mason*and *John R. Holmes,*contra.

The court did not err in refusing, after judgment, *to*permit Burk-ham to file his answer setting up the fact that this prior judgment was void because no service had been had on the answer and cross-petition of Wentzel, for it does not affirmatively appear that service was not waived or appearance entered.

Cox and Smith, concur.
§ 135.329 Crewmember training requirements. ( a ) Each certificate holder must include in its training program the following initial and transition ground training as appropriate to the particular assignment of the crewmember: ( 1 ) Basic indoctrination ground training for newly hired crewmembers including instruction in at least the— ( i ) Duties and responsibilities of crewmembers as applicable;
( ii ) Appropriate provisions of this chapter;
( iii ) Contents of the certificate holder's operating certificate and operations specifications (not required for flight attendants); and
( iv ) Appropriate portions of the certificate holder's operating manual.
( 2 ) The initial and transition ground training in §§ 135.345 and 135.349, as applicable.
( 3 ) Emergency training in § 135.331.
( 4 ) Crew resource management training in § 135.330.
( b ) Each training program must provide the initial and transition flight training in § 135.347, as applicable.
( c ) Each training program must provide recurrent ground and flight training in § 135.351.
( d ) Upgrade training in §§ 135.345 and 135.347 for a particular type aircraft may be included in the training program for crewmembers who have qualified and served as second in command on that aircraft.
( e ) In addition to initial, transition, upgrade and recurrent training, each training program must provide ground and flight training, instruction, and practice necessary to ensure that each crewmember— ( 1 ) Remains adequately trained and currently proficient for each aircraft, crewmember position, and type of operation in which the crewmember serves; and
( 2 ) Qualifies in new equipment, facilities, procedures, and techniques, including modifications to aircraft.
[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-122, 76 FR 3837, Jan. 21, 2011]
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

EXPLANATION

Lithologic symbols

Sond

Organic material

Peel
Fale

Iron cementation or
staining;"hardpan'

Clay

Phosphate nodules

Bea)
egal
Chert fragments

Calcareous clay

=

Limestone

(ea

No recovery, core lost

A mixture of symbols indicates
a mixed lithology

Northwest

4
NEYSWY
Sec. 6, T. 285., R. 2E.

2--S00 cpm

Bo

ws

8

Lo

a8

as

28 28
PLIOCENE 29

Bone Volley formation

MIDDLE MIOCENE
Hawthorn formation

LOWER MIOCENE
Tampa limestone

OLIGOCENE
Suwannee limestone

Other symbols
Lithologic correlation
Stratigraphic correlation
Limits of aluminum and
calcium phosphate zones

Alternating symbols indicate two or
three of the above correlations
follow the same line

F

Section of core from which fossils
were identified

2s
Somple number and interval sampled

from lot 2545

© 900 cpm
Surtoce ss

Trace of gamma-ray log showing
intensity of radiation; cpm =
counts per minute

3

SEUSWA
Sec. 8, T. 28 S., R. 21 E.

2/300 1800 cpm

Scale, in feet

20

2

SEYSE%
Sec. 21, T. 28S., R.

9/300 1800 cpm

BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 17

Southeast

NEYSWY4
Sec. 35, T. 28S.,R. 21E.

Elevation, in feet

© 300 1800 2700 com ~
w
ae
os
°
era
os
we
ae
. L100
&
Q
w
2B. 7 ae
os
}-|o8
as
2
5
3
| 80
gs
Be
=e
wf f- 60
ae
a:
=z
|
|
|
|
|
| = w
a as + 40
r 83
| =f
|
«eg
| es
| a6
|
|
|
|
lL 20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\ L seo level
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L-! pase of Pleistocene (7) | -20
PLIOCENE
Bone Valley formation }- -40
“Aluminum
Prosphate
zone
Calcium
phosphate
zone
L -6o

CROSS SECTION 2, LAND-PEBBLE PHOSPHATE DISTRICT, FLORIDA

466352 © ~ 59 (In pocket)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Gamma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Cunningham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/Joseph Cunningham |
|--------|----------------------|

|   | Joseph Cunningham |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | August 31, 2007 |
|--------|-----------------|
SECOND AMENDMENT TO GROUND LEASE
                        --------------------------------

         SECOND  AMENDMENT  TO GROUND  LEASE dated as July 6, 2000 (the  "Second
,Amendment"),  to the Ground Lease dated as of November  30, 1984,  (the 'Ground
Lund  Lease") by and  between  GUILFORD  MILLS,  INC.,  a  Delaware  corporation
("Landlord"),  and COGENTRIX EASTERN CAROLINA  CORPORATION  ("Tenant"),  a North
Carolina   corporation   and  the  successor  to  Cogentrix   Carolina   Leasing
Corporation.  Terms used herein which are not defined are used as defined in the
Ground Lease.

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              - - - - - - - - - -

         WHEREAS, the Landlord and Tenant have agreed to extend the initial term
of the Ground Lease.

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual  agreements  contained
herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the Landlord and Tenant hereby agree as follows:

         1.  Amendments to Ground Lease.  The Ground Lease is hereby  amended by
deleting Section 2.1 in its entirety and substituting the following therefor:

         Section  2.1 The initial  term of this Lease  shall  commence as of the
         30`h day of  November,  1984  (the  "Commencement  Date")  and,  unless
         extended pursuant to the following  Section 2.2.1 through 2.2.4,  shall
         end at midnight on December 31, 2001.

         2. Full Force and Effect.  Except as modified hereby,  and by the First
Amendment to Ground Lease dated December 16, 1991, the Ground Lease has not been
amended or modified and is and shall remain in full force and effect.

         3. Definitions. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Ground Lease.

         4. Counterparts. This Second Amendment may be executed in any number of
counterparts,  each of which when so executed and  delivered  shall be deemed an
original, and it shall not be necessary in making proof of this Second Amendment
to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

         5.  Governing  Law.  This Second  Amendment  and the Ground  Lease,  as
amended,  shall be deemed to be contracts  made under and for all purposes shall
be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of North Carolina.

                     [ SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE ]
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August

23 , 2018.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00705- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-50346

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 22, 2018. On August 16, 2018, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Busby.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use in this Annual Report [Form 40-F] of CGI Group Inc.[the
Company] of our report dated November 8, 2016 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 included herein and our report dated November 8,
2016 with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016.

We also
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements [Form S-8 Nos. 333-197742, 333-112021, 333-13350, 333-66044, 333-74932, 333-146175 and
333-177013] pertaining to the Companys stock option plans of our reports dated November 8, 2016 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended
September 30, 2016 and 2015 included herein and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016.



LOGO

Montréal, Canada

December 21, 2016





1.CPA Auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A122227
# Official Journal C 299A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.299.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 299A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5615 October 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.299.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 299A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5615 October 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 299A/01 | Publication of a vacancy for a Director of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) in Lisbon (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2013/10339 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2013/C 299A/01

Publication of a vacancy for a Director of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) in Lisbon (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2013/10339

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | |
| 176 | (BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 180 | (MT) |
| 182 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 183 | (IT) |
| 191 | |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |
| 196 | |
| 197 | |
| 199 | |
| 200 | |
| 204 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 210 | (LV) |
| 211 | (PL) |
| 219 | |
| 227 | |
| 231 | |
| 235 | |
| 240 | |
| 264 | |
| 269 | |
| 276 | |
| 277 | |
| 279 | (PT) |
| 286 | (ET) |
| 289 | |
| 290 | |
| 292 | (SK) |
| 293 | (EN) |
| 294 | (DE) |
| 295 | (DA) |
| 299 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

166

167

168

172

173

174

176

(BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

180

(MT)

182

(DE/EN/FR)

183

(IT)

191

192

193

194

196

197

199

200

204

(DE/EN/FR)

210

(LV)

211

(PL)

219

227

231

235

240

264

269

276

277

279

(PT)

286

(ET)

289

290

292

(SK)

293

(EN)

294

(DE)

295

(DA)

299

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
p.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

113) IV-C-79 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:57AM Sheet 113 of 232 
% y 

FJ- 87-^ 1 

P.2 

t 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

pes tH , ^a« 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Robert C. Smith 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Smith: 

Thank you for passing along your comments and those of 

your constituent, Ms. Mildred A. Beach, concerning EPA's 

proposal to require onboard refueling emission controls. Be 

assured that these comments will be considered as we prepare our 

final rule. We will also be placing them in the public docket 

for the rulemaking (Docket No. A-87-11). 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Docket A-87-11 

Prepared by: Form Letter:sal:2/19/88:AL880704 - Ann Arbor, MI 

bcc: Region 01 

Congressional Liaison/Quinn 

Docket A-87-11 c/o Jackie McManus
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-199-000]

                    In the Commission's order issued on March 31, 2000,[1]                                          the Commission directed that a technical conference be held to address issues raised by the filing.                

Take notice that the technical conference has been rescheduled for Tuesday, May 16, 2000, at 9:30 am, in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.

All interested parties and Staff are permitted to attend.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             90 FERC ¶ 61,341 (2000).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-10863  Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 171.45 Minimum requirements for approval. ( a ) The following are the minimum requirements that must be met before the FAA will approve an IFR procedure for a non-Federal Instrument Landing System: ( 1 ) The facility's performance, as determined by air and ground inspection, must meet the requirements of § 171.47.
( 2 ) The installation of the equipment must meet the requirements of § 171.49.
( 3 ) The owner must agree to operate and maintain the facility in accord- ance with § 171.51.
( 4 ) The owner must agree to furnish periodic reports, as set forth in § 171.53 and agree to allow the FAA to inspect the facility and its operation whenever necessary.
( 5 ) The owner must assure the FAA that he will not withdraw the facility from service without the permission of the FAA.
( 6 ) The owner must bear all costs of meeting the requirements of this section and of any flight or ground inspections made before the facility is commissioned, except that the Federal Aviation Administration may bear certain of these costs subject to budgetary limitations and policy established by the Administrator.
( b ) If the applicant for approval meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, the FAA commissions the facility as a prerequisite to its approval for use in an IFR procedure. The approval is withdrawn at any time the facility does not continue to meet those requirements. In addition, the facility may be de-commissioned whenever the frequency channel is needed for higher priority common system service.
[Doc. No. 5034, 29 FR 11337, Aug. 6, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 171-6, 35 FR 10288, June 24, 1970]
951 P.2d 449

#### Blake ZUERN/Frank Zuern/Kristie Zuern v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY.

No. CV-97-0081-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

Dec. 16, 1997.

Prior report: App., 188 Ariz. 486, 937 P.2d 676.

ORDERED: Motion for Depublication of Court of Appeals Opinion DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 2920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1074]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

36 CFR Parts 5 and 13

RIN 1024-AC58


National Park System Units in Alaska; Denali National Park and 
Preserve, Special Regulations

AGENCY:  National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION:  Proposed rule; reopening and extension of public comment 
period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  In response to requests the NPS is extending the public 
comment period on this proposed rule published November 12, 1999 (64 FR 
61563-61572) from January 11, 2000 to January 25, 2000.

DATES: Written comments will be accepted through January 25, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  Address comments to: Superintendent, Denali National Park 
and Preserve, PO Box 9, Denali National Park, AK 99755. Attention: 
Chief Ranger.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ken Kehrer at the above address or by 
calling 907-683-2294.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPS extends the public comment period 
for the proposed rule--National Park System Units in Alaska; Denali 
National Park and Preserve, Special Regulations. The comment period was 
to end on January 11, 2000 but is being extended by this announcement 
until January 25, 2000. All comments on the proposed rule must be 
received at Denali National Park headquarters by close of business that 
day. We are taking this action in response to comments received 
requesting additional time to review the proposed regulation.

    Dated: January 11, 2000.
Donald J. Barry,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 00-1074 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 213

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 213 appear at 61 FR 34725, July 3, 1996.

#### § 213.4 [Reserved]
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN:___ SE00 985

__ __________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
§ 25.999 Fuel system drains. ( a ) Drainage of the fuel system must be accomplished by the use of fuel strainer and fuel tank sump drains.
( b ) Each drain required by paragraph (a) of this section must— ( 1 ) Discharge clear of all parts of the airplane;
( 2 ) Have manual or automatic means for positive locking in the closed position; and
( 3 ) Have a drain valve— ( i ) That is readily accessible and which can be easily opened and closed; and
( ii ) That is either located or protected to prevent fuel spillage in the event of a landing with landing gear retracted.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-38, 41 FR 55467, Dec. 20, 1976]