alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    50897
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3036
<INVENTORY>                                      39142
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                101761
<PP&E>                                          213142
<DEPRECIATION>                                   75168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  323756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            38343
<BONDS>                                         204145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       65185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    323756
<SALES>                                         299532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                299532
<CGS>                                           208321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    50806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  3036
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               22773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  14341
<INCOME-TAX>                                      6900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               7441
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7441
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.30
        

</TABLE>
§ 25.1301 Function and installation. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 68735 , Aug. 27, 2024.
( a ) Each item of installed equipment must— ( 1 ) Be of a kind and design appropriate to its intended function;
( 2 ) Be labeled as to its identification, function, or operating limitations, or any applicable combination of these factors;
( 3 ) Be installed according to limitations specified for that equipment; and
( 4 ) Function properly when installed.
( b ) EWIS must meet the requirements of subpart H of this part.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18333, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-123, 72 FR 63405, Nov. 8, 2007]
Exhibit 10.3



Summary Sheet of Employment Agreement

with Patrick Haskell





Patrick Haskell was appointed as Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer effective as of June 17, 2008.  On that date, the Board of Directors approved a financial package and authorized the entry into an Employment Agreement for a term of three years.  Mr. Haskell is receiving an annual base salary of $250,000, increasing to $450,000 upon achievement of a significant milestone.  His salary will either accrue or be payable in common stock until Ecosphere has sufficient cash resources.  He is also eligible to receive a performance bonus upon meeting an additional milestone.  Mr. Haskell was granted 8,250,000 non-qualified stock options and cash settled stock appreciation rights (SARs) in tandem, exercisable at $0.50 per share over a five-year period.  The SARs are only exercisable if Ecosphere does not have sufficient authorized capital to permit all outstanding options and warrants to be exercised.  Of the options and SARs, 2,750,000 are subject to both performance and time based vesting over a three-year period, subject to continued employment on each applicable vesting date.  The remaining balance vests ratably over a three-year period, subject to continued employment on each applicable vesting date.  Mr. Haskell shall receive two years base salary and all of his unvested options and SARs shall vest immediately upon a termination for Good Reason.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7137

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TAVON ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:06-cr-00074-WDQ-1; 1:09-cv-02305-WDQ)

Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 17, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Seth Allen Neyhart, STARK LAW GROUP, PLLC, Chapel Hill, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Kwame Jangha Manley, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tavon Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) 

motion and its margin order denying his motion to amend. The 

orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that his § 2255 motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently 

reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson has not made the 

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### LEAVITT *v.*MURRAY.

Laud leased for gross rent — quantity—evidence—division of-the court — error.

Where land has been leased for rent in gross upon an estimate of quantity, it is incompetent for the tenant to show a less quantity of land than \vas#estimated, to reduce the rent, without the agreement was to reduce in that event.

If evidence is admitted by the division of the court that ought to have been-rejected, the judgment will be reversed on error.

Error to the Common Pleas. Leavitt brought assumpsit in the court below upon a written lease without seal. Issue was taken on non assumpsit with a notice of setoff. On trial,-the plaintiff read the lease in evidence, which was for a piece of ground *estimated to contain*ten acres at $50, and proved that the defendant entered into the premises and enjoyed them. The defendant then offered to prove that the quantity of land in the tract was less than ten acres. To this evidence, the plaintiff objected, and the court being equally *708divided in. opinion, it was admitted, and judgment given for the defendant. It is alleged for error, that the evidence ought to have been excluded.

*Knapp*and *Whittlesey,*for the plaintiff,

cited 2 *Cranch R.*10,29 j 9 *Wheat. R.*819.

*Giddings*and *Wade,*contra.

By the Court.

The parties in this case reduced their contract to writing, and by that they are bound, unless there was fraud or mistake — there is no pretence of either. The contract shows that the parties did not know exactly the quantity of land — they estimated the quantity and agreed upon a certain rent in gross, not by the acre. It was incompetent for the defendant to prove there was. a less quantity of land, without showing also an agreement to deduct, if that was found to be the case. The evidence, therefore, should have been rejected. The judgment and proceedings since the issue are reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 4.16


                            SCHEDULE OF SUBSCRIBERS


BPI Canadian Small Companies Fund
956872 Ontario Limited
Interward Corporation
Rockhaven Holdings Limited
YMG Capital Management Incorporated
Acuity Investment Management Incorporated
Beluga NV
Pinetree Capital Corp.
Fallingbrook Investments Limited
Glentel Incorporated
Scott Leckie
Frank Fini
Crothers Leasing Limited
Moise Afriat
Lionel K. Conacher
Kehler International Equities (1990) Incorporated
Jean Gevaert
Ron Kaulbach
Andrew Parsons
Eldon Guay
David J. Grand
Merdoch & Company
Robert F. Wilson
ABC Family Trust
Third Point Partners LP
Third Point Offshore Fund Limited
Points West International Investments Limited
Banzai Partners LP
Banzai Offshore Fund Limited
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.17 What is a petition for rulemaking?

A petition for rulemaking is a request to FAA by an individual or entity asking the FAA to adopt, amend, or repeal a regulation.
Sec. 1-4 System of accounts coding. ( a ) A four digit control number is assigned for each balance sheet and profit and loss account. Each balance sheet account is numbered sequentially, within blocks, designating basic balance sheet classifications. The first two digits of the four digit code assigned to each profit and loss account denote a detailed area of financial activity or functional operation. The first two digits, thus assigned to each profit and loss account, are numbered sequentially within blocks, designating more general classifications of financial activity and functional operation. The second two digits assigned to profit and loss accounts denote objective classifications.
( b ) A fifth digit, appended as a decimal, has been assigned for internal control by the BTS of prescribed subdivisions of the primary objective balance sheet and profit and loss classifications. A different fifth digit code number from that assigned by the BTS may be adopted for internal recordkeeping by the air carrier provided the prescribed subclassification of objective accounts is not impaired and the code number assigned by the BTS is employed in reporting to the BTS on Form 41 Reports.
[ER-755, 37 FR 19726, Sept. 21, 1972, as amended at 60 FR 66723, Dec. 26, 1995]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 84 (Monday, May 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10788]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDDK.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney diseases, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDDK.
    Date: June 14-16, 2000.
    Time: 6:00 pm to 11:00 am.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 5, Room 127, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Ira W. Levin, Acting Director, Division of 
Intramural Research, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive, 
and Kidney Diseases, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 21, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-10788 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 3, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 25645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10945]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-00-127]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Fore River, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District has issued a 
temporary deviation from the existing drawbridge regulations for the 
Quincy Weymouth SR3A Bridge, mile 3.5, across the Fore River between 
Quincy and Weymouth, Massachusetts. This deviation allows the bridge 
owner to keep the bridge in the closed position for 4 hours, 8 a.m. to 
12 p.m., on May 6, 2000. This deviation is necessary to facilitate 
necessary repairs to the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective on May 6, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John McDonald, Project Officer, 
First Coast Guard District, (617) 223-8364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Quincy Weymouth SR3A Bridge has a 
vertical clearance of 33 feet at mean high water and 43 feet at mean 
low water. The existing regulations for the bridge in 33 CFR 117.621 
require the bridge to open on signal, except that; from 6:30 a.m. to 9 
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays 
observed in the locality, the draw need not be opened. The draw shall 
open on signal at all times for self-propelled vessels greater than 
10,000 gross tons.
    The bridge owner, the Massachusetts Highway Department (MHD), asked 
the Coast Guard to allow the bridge to remain closed on May 6, 2000, 
from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. to facilitate electrical repairs at the bridge.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed 
with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as 
soon as possible. This deviation is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: April 24, 2000.
Robert F. Duncan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, First Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 00-10945 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 12, 2014

No. 04-14-00713-CR

Ex parte Anthony Ray PERRYMAN

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10581

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on November 12, 2014.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of November, 2014.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
#### Peters v. Peters

*Hyman Goldstein,*for plaintiff.

No appearance for defendant.

September 5, 1957.

Shughart, P. J.,

— Service of the complaint in the above captioned action of divorce *374was made by registered mail on defendant ouside the Commonwealth. A return receipt was filed but there was no identification of the signature thereon as that of defendant at the hearing before the master. Such proof of the signature of defendant is required. See Goodrich-Amram Civil Practice Comments, §1124 (a) —12.

It is quite probable that the required proof can be furnished and, therefore, the matter is referred back to the master for further action.

One other matter deserves mention. Plaintiff indicated that she is receiving support from her husband for the children. If this is so, then it would seem that service of the new notice of the refiling of the report could be effected.

And now, September 5, 1957, at 1 p.m., the above matter is referred back to the master for further proceedings in conformity to the foregoing opinion.

Notice of the refiling of the report to be given to defendant in the same manner as required for the initial filing.
§ 25.1351 General. ( a ) *Electrical system capacity.* The required generating capacity, and number and kinds of power sources must— ( 1 ) Be determined by an electrical load analysis; and
( 2 ) Meet the requirements of § 25.1309.
( b ) *Generating system.* The generating system includes electrical power sources, main power busses, transmission cables, and associated control, regulation, and protective devices. It must be designed so that— ( 1 ) Power sources function properly when independent and when connected in combination;
( 2 ) No failure or malfunction of any power source can create a hazard or impair the ability of remaining sources to supply essential loads;
( 3 ) The system voltage and frequency (as applicable) at the terminals of all essential load equipment can be maintained within the limits for which the equipment is designed, during any probable operating condition; and
( 4 ) System transients due to switching, fault clearing, or other causes do not make essential loads inoperative, and do not cause a smoke or fire hazard.
( 5 ) There are means accessible, in flight, to appropriate crewmembers for the individual and collective disconnection of the electrical power sources from the system.
( 6 ) There are means to indicate to appropriate crewmembers the generating system quantities essential for the safe operation of the system, such as the voltage and current supplied by each generator.
( c ) *External power.* If provisions are made for connecting external power to the airplane, and that external power can be electrically connected to equipment other than that used for engine starting, means must be provided to ensure that no external power supply having a reverse polarity, or a reverse phase sequence, can supply power to the airplane's electrical system.
( d ) *Operation without normal electrical power.* It must be shown by analysis, tests, or both, that the airplane can be operated safely in VFR conditions, for a period of not less than five minutes, with the normal electrical power (electrical power sources excluding the battery) inoperative, with critical type fuel (from the standpoint of flameout and restart capability), and with the airplane initially at the maximum certificated altitude. Parts of the electrical system may remain on if— ( 1 ) A single malfunction, including a wire bundle or junction box fire, cannot result in loss of both the part turned off and the part turned on; and
( 2 ) The parts turned on are electrically and mechanically isolated from the parts turned off.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-41, 42 FR 36970, July 18, 1977; Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29785, July 20, 1990]
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 54181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19409]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Sixty-Eighth Meeting, Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Sixty-Eighth Meeting, Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Sixty-Eighth Meeting, Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 27, 2016, 9:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: Federal Aviation 
Administration, Rotorcraft Directorate, Conference Room CC-10C/F, 10101 
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Morrison at rmorrison@rtca.org 
or (202) 330-0654 or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 
910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at 
(202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Sixty-Eighth Meeting, Special 
Committee 135, Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for 
Airborne Equipment. The agenda will include the following:

Working Groups October 25-26:

October 25 a.m. Session: Ground Reference Fluctuations/IMA
October 25 p.m. Session: RF Susceptibility
October 26 a.m. Session: Explosion, Water, Fluids/Sections 1-3
October 26 p.m. Session: Power Inputs

Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 9:00am

    1. Chairmen's Opening Remarks, Introductions.
    2. Approval of Summary from the Sixty-Seventh Meeting--(RTCA Paper 
No. 185-16/SC135-708).
    3. Review Working Group Summaries.
    4. Flammability Update--Enclosure Fire Test
    5. Review Terms of Reference.
    6. New/Unfinished Business.
    7. Establish Date for Next SC-135 Meeting.
    8. Closing.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 9, 2016.
Mohannad Dawoud
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-19409 Filed 8-12-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
§ 171.61 Air navigation certificate: Revocation and termination. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each air navigation certificate of “Lawful Authority to Operate a True Light” is hereby revoked, and each application therefor is hereby terminated.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to— ( 1 ) A certificate issued to a Federal-Aid Airport Program sponsor who was required to apply for that certificate under regulations then in effect, and who has not surrendered that certificate under § 151.86(e) of this chapter; or
( 2 ) An application made by a Federal-Aid Airport Program sponsor who was required to make that application under regulations then in effect, and who has not terminated that application under § 151.86(e) of this chapter.
(49 U.S.C. 1101-1120; sec. 307, 72 Stat. 749, 49 U.S.C. 1348)
[Amdt. 171-4, 33 FR 12545, Sept. 5, 1968]