alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1420
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               18
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1420
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    52
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    64
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (12)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (12)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (12)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 218.7 Presumption.

Whether under a particular lease agreement the lessor of the aircraft is engaged in foreign air transportation is a question of fact to be determined in the light of all the facts and circumstances. However, in circumstances where the lessor furnishes both the aircraft and the crew, there is a presumption that true operational control and safety responsibility are exercised by the lessor, and that the agreement constitutes a charter arrangement under which the lessor is engaged in foreign air transportation. The burden shall rest upon the applicants for disclaimer of jurisdiction in each instance to demonstrate by an appropriate factual showing that the operation contemplated will not constitute foreign air transportation by the lessor.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et 

al.,

Debtors.

PROMESA 

Title III 

Case No.: 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

This filing relates to the 

Commonwealth, ERS, HTA, and PBA.

Claim No. 59396

Claimant: Pharma Bio Serv PR Inc.

MOTION SUBMITTING CERTIFIED TRANSLATIONS TO ENGLISH

OF EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO PHARMA-BIO SERV PR INC.’S 

RESPONSE TO OMNIBUS OBJECTION OF DEBTOR

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

COME NOW creditor Pharma Bio Serv PR Inc. (hereinafter “Pharma” or 

“Claimant”), through the undersigned counsels, and very respectfully STATE and PRAY 

as follows:

1. On July 13, 2023 Pharma filed before this Honorable Court a document entitled: 

“Response by claimant Pharma-Bio Serv PR Inc. to omnibus objection of debtor.” 

[Docket No. 24735]. Some of the exhibits attached to said Response to Omnibus 

Objection were in Spanish language.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24861 Filed:08/10/23 Entered:08/10/23 17:02:10 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2

2. Pharma requested leave from this Court to obtain certified translations to English of 

the documents that were in Spanish language, and to re-file such exhibits in English 

before this Honorable Court. Said request was granted by this Honorable Court. 

[See Docket 24739].

3. Pharma hereby submits the certified translations of Exhibit 4, Exhibit 5, and 

Exhibit 6 of its “Response by claimant Pharma-Bio Serv PR Inc. to omnibus 

objection of debtor.” [Docket No. 24735].

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this Honorable Court accepts and 

incorporate the certified translations to English of the exhibits attached to this motion, to 

Pharma’s “Response by claimant Pharma-Bio Serv PR Inc. to omnibus objection of debtor” 

[Docket No. 24735].

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 10

th day of August, 2023.

WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT the undersigned counsels electronically filed the 

present document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System, which in turn 

will send notification of this filing to all attorneys of record.

Carlos R. Paula, Esq.

Attorney for creditor Pharma Bio Serv PR Inc.

Citibank Towers, Suite 500

252 Ponce de León Avenue

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918

Tel. (787) 758-1400

Cel. (787) 460-3456

paula@laborcounsels.com

S/ CARLOS R. PAULA

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24861 Filed:08/10/23 Entered:08/10/23 17:02:10 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
3

USDCPR # 212009

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24861 Filed:08/10/23 Entered:08/10/23 17:02:10 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
#### Dan Mayo, *Plaintiff in Error, v.*The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

1. In a prosecution for homicide where self defense is an issue and the defendant has testified as to his belief of his danger from the deceased, it is not error to exclude the testimony of the accused that the deceased “could have cut me if I had waited any longer to shoot him” since the circumstances were in evidence and the conclusions of fact were to be deduced therefrom by the jury.

*962. Where the evidence is conflicting, but there is ample evidence to support the verdict, and no material errors of law appear, the judgment will be affirmed.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Jackson County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

*Lewis & Buford,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Park Trammell,*Attorney General, and *G. O. Andrews,*for the State.

Whitfield, C. J.

This writ of error was taken to a conviction of manslaughter. An assignment of error is predicated upon the overruling of an objection to a question, but as the question does not appear to have been answered the assignment is unavailing. While testifying as a witness the defendant Mayo in support of his act as being in self defense stated that the deceased “could have cut me if I had waited any longer to shoot him.” The State Attorney objected to this language as calling for the opinion of the witness. The objection was sustained and an exception noted for the defendant. As the Court merely sustained the objection to the testimony and did not strike it or direct the jury to disregard it, the question may not be properly presented, but there was no harmful error in the action of the Court, since the quoted language expressed an opinion rather than a fact. The circumstances were in evidence and conclusions of fact are properly drawn by the jury and not by ordinary witnesses. The defendant was permitted to testify as to his belief of his danger from the deceased.

*97The conflicts in the testimony were settled by the jury, and as there is ample evidence to sustain the verdict and no material errors of law appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Taylor, Shackleford, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J.,' concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000797564
<NAME> UNICO, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   386
<PP&E>                                          72,667
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          446,913
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,510
<OTHER-SE>                                   (421,370)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,053
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               527,545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (527,545)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (527,545)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (527,545)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.11.2

                             AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE
                            TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
                         DEFERRED PLAN FOR DIRECTOR FEES

         Pursuant to the provisions of Article VII thereof, the Trinity
Industries, Inc. Deferred Plan for Director Fees (the "Plan") is hereby amended
effective as of April 1, 2003 in the following respect only:

         FIRST: The second paragraph of Article II of the Plan is amended by
restatement in its entirety to read as follows:

         In lieu of having the Account credited with an interest equivalent as
provided in the preceding paragraph, a Director may elect to have the deferred
portion of his or her Annual Fee treated as if invested in units of Common Stock
of the Company ("Stock Units"). Stock Units will be deemed to be acquired on the
first day of each quarter for the deferred portion of the Annual Fee credited to
the Account in the prior quarter. Dividend equivalents in the form of additional
Stock Units will be credited to the Account as of the date of payment of cash
dividends on the Company's Common Stock. A Stock Unit shall be deemed to be
equal in value to a share of Common Stock of the Company at the closing price of
the Company's Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the first date of
particular determination, or if the date of determination is not a trading day
on the New York Stock Exchange, on the next succeeding trading day. In case of a
split or other subdivision of the Company's Common Stock, Stock Units will be
similarly deemed to be split or subdivided. At each Adjustment Date, a
Participant's Account that has been credited with Stock Units shall be valued on
the basis of shares of the Company's Common Stock at that date, taking into
account any increase or decrease in the market value of the Company's Common
Stock.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed this 1st day of
April, 2003.

                                           TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.



                                           By /s/ M.G. Fortado
                                              ----------------------
                                              Title:  Vice President
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.206 Statement of fares.

All fares filed electronically in direct-service markets shall be filed as single factor fares.
§ 23.2130 Landing. The applicant must determine the following, for standard temperatures at critical combinations of weight and altitude within the operational limits: ( a ) The distance, starting from a height of 50 feet (15 meters) above the landing surface, required to land and come to a stop.
( b ) The approach and landing speeds, configurations, and procedures, which allow a pilot of average skill to land within the published landing distance consistently and without causing damage or injury, and which allow for a safe transition to the balked landing conditions of this part accounting for: ( 1 ) Stall speed safety margin; and
( 2 ) Minimum control speeds.
# C_2016045EN.01000101.xml

| 5.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2013-2014 SESSION

Sittings of 15 to 18 April 2013

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 242 E, 23.8.2013.

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 242 E, 23.8.2013.

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
230126 ORD RE CHF STATUS REPORT VERSION DECEMBER 1, 2022 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER ADJOURNING HEARING CONCERNING COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION OF 

P.R. INC.’S MOTION FOR ALLOWANCE AND PAYMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE

The Court has received and reviewed the Status Report Concerning Community 

Health Foundation of P.R. Inc.’s Motion for Allowance and Payment of Administrative Expense

(Docket Entry No. 23389 in Case No. 17-3283)2 (the “Status Report”). Through the Status 

Report, the Parties3 request entry of an order adjourning the Motion. (Status Report ¶ 5.) 

Accordingly, the Motion will be heard in connection with the omnibus hearing scheduled for 

March 15, 2023.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2023

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN 

United States District Judge

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number 

and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are 

the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits 

of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto 

Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the 

Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 

(“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as 

Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

2 All docket entry references herein are to the docket of Case No. 17-3283. 

3 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meaning given to them in the Status 

Report.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23398 Filed:01/26/23 Entered:01/26/23 17:13:49 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-176-017 and RP99-176-018]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 28, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 25, 2000, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Sixth Revised Volume No. 1. Original Sheet No. 26J.
    Natural states that the purpose of this filing is to implement a 
negotiated rate transaction with the Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company 
(Peoples) under Natural's Rate Schedule ITS pursuant to Section 49 of 
the General Terms and Conditions of Natural's tariff.
    Natural concurrently tenders by a separate filing in Docket No. 
RP99-176-018 its negotiated rate agreement (Agreement) between Natural 
and Peoples.
    Natural states that the negotiated rate Agreement does not deviate 
in any material respects from the applicable form of service agreement 
in Natural's Tariff. Natural states that it submits the Agreement as an 
aid to Commission Staff because it provides a more detailed explanation 
of the pricing terms related to the transaction. Key provisions of the 
Agreement include guaranteed revenue, unhedged and unscheduled quantity 
adjustments, and the trigger agreement. Natural also states that the 
above pricing terms were critical to the Agreement by both parties and 
to the resulting negotiated rates.
    Natural requests that Original Sheet No. 26J and the related 
Agreement to become effective April 25, 2000.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
Natural's customers, interested state commissions and all parties set 
out on the Commission's official service list in Docket No. RP99-176.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20246, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with the Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10996 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT F

BREAKDOWN OF COMPENSATION AND EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT AND BY 

WHETHER SERVICES WERE RENDERED IN PUERTO RICO OR OUTSIDE 

PUERTO RICO

February 2023 Fee Statement

March 2023 Fee Statement

Fees 20% Discount

Fees Requested 

to Be Paid (90%)

Expenses 

Requested to Be 

Paid (100%)

Total Fees & 

Expenses 

Requested to 

Be Paid

Total for Commonwealth

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total for PREPA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$43,830.00 $8,766.00 $31,557.60 $0 $31,557.60

Total for ERS

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total for HTA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Grand Total $43,830.00 $8,766.00 $31,557.60 $0 $31,557.60

Fees 20% Discount

Fees Requested 

to Be Paid (90%)

Expenses 

Requested to Be 

Paid (100%)

Total Fees & 

Expenses 

Requested to 

Be Paid

Total for Commonwealth

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total for PREPA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$40,966.00 $8,193.20 $29,495.52 $0 $29,495.52

Total for ERS

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$3,080.00 $616.00 $2,217.60 $0 $2,217.60

Total for HTA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Grand Total $44,046.00 $8,809.20 $31,713.12 $0 $31,713.12

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24740-6 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 15:19:47 Desc:

Exhibit F Page 1 of 2
April 2023 Fee Statement

May 2023 Fee Statement

Fees 20% Discount

Fees Requested 

to Be Paid (90%)

Expenses 

Requested to Be 

Paid (100%)

Total Fees & 

Expenses 

Requested to 

Be Paid

Total for Commonwealth

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total for PREPA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$10,159.50 $2,031.90 $7,314.84 $0 $7,314.84

Total for ERS

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$1,772.50 $354.50 $1,276.20 $0 $1,276.20

Total for HTA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

 

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Grand Total $11,932.00 $2,386.40 $8,591.04 $0 $8,951.04

Fees 20% Discount

Fees Requested 

to Be Paid (90%)

Expenses 

Requested to Be 

Paid (100%)

Total Fees & 

Expenses 

Requested to 

Be Paid

Total for Commonwealth

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total for PREPA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$65,379.00 $13,075.80 $47,072.88 $2,809.16 $49,882.04

Total for ERS

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$2,745.00 $549.00 $1,976.40 $0 $1,976.40

Total for HTA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Grand Total $68,124.00 $13,624.80 $49,049.28 $2,809.16 $51,858.44

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24740-6 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 15:19:47 Desc:

Exhibit F Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**I, Montgomery Bannerman, Chief Executive Officer of Verso Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), dohereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006(the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and  2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May 12, 2006       /s/ Montgomery Bannerman         Montgomery Bannerman,    Chief Executive Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1476/2004

of 18 August 2004         

amending Regulation (EC) No 97/2004 correcting Regulations (EC) No 2281/2003 and (EC) No 2299/2003 determining the world market price for unginned cotton

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Greece, and in particular Protocol 4 on cotton (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 of 22 May 2001 on production aid for cotton (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 97/2004 is hereby amended as follows: the words ‘at the request of the interested party’ in the second and third paragraphs of Article 3 are deleted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 22 January 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 August 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture

----

(1)  Protocol as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2001 (OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 15, 22.1.2004, p. 12.

----