alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Doe Run Resources
      Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
      that:





The
      annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2005, of the
      Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K/A
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.








Date:
      October 19, 2006











By: /s/
      A.
      Bruce Neil


A.
      Bruce
      Neil


President
      & Chief Executive Officer
§ 187.55 Overflight fees billing and payment procedures. ( a ) The FAA will send an invoice to each user when fees are owed to the FAA. If the FAA cannot identify the user, then an invoice will be sent to the registered owner. Users will be billed at the address of record in the country where the aircraft is registered, unless a billing address is otherwise provided.
( b ) The FAA will send an invoice if the monthly (based on Universal Coordinated Time) fees equal or exceed $400.
( c ) Payment must be made by one of the methods described in § 187.15(d).
[Docket FAA-2015-3597, Amdt. 187-36, 81 FR 85853, Nov. 29, 2016]
§ 141.43 Pilot briefing areas. ( a ) An applicant for a pilot school certificate or provisional pilot school certificate must show that the applicant has continuous use of a briefing area located at each airport at which training flights originate that is: ( 1 ) Adequate to shelter students waiting to engage in their training flights;
( 2 ) Arranged and equipped for the conduct of pilot briefings; and
( 3 ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, for a school with an instrument rating or commercial pilot course, equipped with private landline or telephone communication to the nearest FAA Flight Service Station.
( b ) A briefing area required by paragraph (a) of this section may not be used by the applicant if it is available for use by any other pilot school during the period it is required for use by the applicant.
( c ) The communication equipment required by paragraph (a)(3) of this section is not required if the briefing area and the flight service station are located on the same airport, and are readily accessible to each other.
US EPA Water Quality Standards Regulatory Changes - State Conference Call

December 15, 2010

Participant Listing

Name State

Lori Belangia ASIWPCA

Debra Daniels AZ

Debbie Smith CA

Ali Syed CA

Traci Iott CT

Eric Shaw FL

Drew Bartlett FL

Nancy Ross FL

Bob Scott GA

Elizabeth Booth GA

Don Essig ID

Nichole Deinarowicz ID

Bob Mosher IL

Martha Clark- Mettler IN

Shivi Selvaratman IN

Kris Pintado LA

Mark Tomasek MN

Susan Davies MN

Moshen Dkhili MO

Connie Brower NC

John Bender NE

Patrick Rice NE

Susannah King NEIWPCC

Debbie Hammond NJ

Jim Howell NOT KNOWN

Jason Childress NOT KNOWN

Kathy Sertic NV

Mark Klotz NY

Scott Stoner NY

Ross Brady NY

Derek Smithee OK

Jennifer Wigal OR

Andrea Matzke OR

Peter Tennant ORSANCO

Amy Bennet SC

John Litton SC

David Graves SC

Dave Chestnut SC

Paul Davis TN

Susan Johnson TX

Ellen Gilinsky VA

Roger Stewart VA

Mary Borg VT
US EPA Water Quality Standards Regulatory Changes - State Conference Call

December 15, 2010

Participant Listing

Becca Conklin WA

Chad Brown WA

Susan Braley WA

Scott Mandirola WV
#### LAWRENCE v. THE STATE.

(Decided April 22, 1915.)

Appeal from Walker Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. T. L. Sowell.

*685No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Thomas, J.

Appeal dismissed on authority of *Clark v.*State, 8 Ala. App. 105, 62 South. 987.
UNITED TATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIO AGENC

REGIO 8

1595 WYNKOOP TREET

V ~R, 0 0202-1129

Phone 800-227-8917

http://www.cpa.go /region08

: 13

DOCKET 0.: CAA-08-2011-0021

rNTHE MATT R F;

i ERPLU RE UR t (U )

CORPORATION

[ cspondcnt

)

)

)

)

)

)

OIm R GRA T G. 0 T

MOTION TO AMEND

ADMINI TR TTVE OMl'LAfNT A

CONSENT AGREEMENT

On JWle 25 2012, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Amend Administrative Complaint and

onsent Agreem nt. The Motion requests pursuant to Paragraph F.13 ofthe Agreement, that

tbe omplaint and nsent Agreement b amended to include a Revised Appendix A, Tables A1.;\- , 1\-3, A-4 and a n wTabl A-5 t th Agre m nt.

Paragraphs D.1.f g h D.2.b, and F.6 are to be revised for consistency to reference the new

Table A-5 and the new commence construction deadline of August 29 2012. There is no

incr ase in the penalty amowlt caus d by the r vision ofAppendix A.

Th court hereby approves the M tion to Amend to includ the Revised ppendi A, Tables AI, A-2, A-3 A-4 and A-5 based on the temlS ofthe Complaint and Consent Agreement.

Tb' RC'pondent is hcl' by ROE i 0 t c mply with all the leon of th onsent Agr 111 nt

and Final Order. .

fficeT

SO ORDERED TIDS "=':::'---"'"-__Day of::::-~~~::::::""-~'t--_---r-+-+-' 2012
CERTlFlCATE OF ERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the original of the attached ORDER GRANHNG JOINT

MOTION TO AMEND CONSENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL ORDER in tlle matter of

ENERPLUS RESOURCES (USA) CORPORATION; DOCKET NO.: CAA-08-2011-0021.

was filed with the Regional Hearing Clerk 011 June 28, 2012.

Further, the undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the document was

delivered to David Rochlin. cnior Enforcement Anomey. U. S. EPA - Region 8.1595

Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202-1129. True and correct copics oflhe aforementioned

documents were pluccd in lhe United States mail on June 28, 2012, to:

Tony Lucero, Env. Health & arety Coord.

Enerplus Resources (USA) Corp.

950 17th Sueet, Suite 2200

Denver, Colorado 80202-2805

June 28. 2012 JuJCv o.kU4

Tina Artemis

Paralegal/Regional Hearing Clerk
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.33 Inspection and tests. ( a ) Each applicant must allow the FAA to make any inspection and any flight and ground test necessary to determine compliance with the applicable requirements of this subchapter. However, unless otherwise authorized by the FAA— ( 1 ) No aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, or part thereof may be presented to the FAA for test unless compliance with paragraphs (b)(2) through (b)(4) of this section has been shown for that aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, or part thereof; and
( 2 ) No change may be made to an aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, or part thereof between the time that compliance with paragraphs (b)(2) through (b)(4) of this section is shown for that aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, or part thereof and the time that it is presented to the FAA for test.
( b ) Each applicant must make all inspections and tests necessary to determine— ( 1 ) Compliance with the applicable airworthiness, aircraft noise, fuel venting, and exhaust emission requirements;
( 2 ) That materials and products conform to the specifications in the type design;
( 3 ) That parts of the products conform to the drawings in the type design; and
( 4 ) That the manufacturing processes, construction and assembly conform to those specified in the type design.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14564, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-17, 32 FR 14926, Oct. 28, 1967; Amdt. 21-27, 34 FR 18363, Nov. 18, 1969; Amdt. 21-44, 41 FR 55463, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 21-68, 55 FR 32860, Aug. 10, 1990; Amdt. 21-68, 55 FR 32860, Aug. 10, 1990; Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53386, Oct. 16, 2009]
April 28, 1977

No. 76-6475.

#### Wilson *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 60.
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in Registration Statements (Nos. 333-105195 and 333-12160) on Form
S-3 and Registration Statements (Nos. 333-57091, 333-72456, 333-72458, 333-72460
 and 333-112761) on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 14, 2005, relating to
the financial statements of OMI Corporation and managements report of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this
Annual Report  on Form 10-K of OMI Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2004.

|New York, New YorkMarch 14, 2005
|--------------------------------

---
§ 135.173 Airborne thunderstorm detection equipment requirements. ( a ) No person may operate an aircraft that has a passenger seating configuration, excluding any pilot seat, of 10 seats or more in passenger-carrying operations, except a helicopter operating under day VFR conditions, unless the aircraft is equipped with either approved thunderstorm detection equipment or approved airborne weather radar equipment.
( b ) No person may operate a helicopter that has a passenger seating configuration, excluding any pilot seat, of 10 seats or more in passenger-carrying operations, under night VFR when current weather reports indicate that thunderstorms or other potentially hazardous weather conditions that can be detected with airborne thunderstorm detection equipment may reasonably be expected along the route to be flown, unless the helicopter is equipped with either approved thunderstorm detection equipment or approved airborne weather radar equipment.
( c ) No person may begin a flight under IFR or night VFR conditions when current weather reports indicate that thunderstorms or other potentially hazardous weather conditions that can be detected with airborne thunderstorm detection equipment, required by paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, may reasonably be expected along the route to be flown, unless the airborne thunderstorm detection equipment is in satisfactory operating condition.
( d ) If the airborne thunderstorm detection equipment becomes inoperative en route, the aircraft must be operated under the instructions and procedures specified for that event in the manual required by § 135.21.
( e ) This section does not apply to aircraft used solely within the State of Hawaii, within the State of Alaska, within that part of Canada west of longitude 130 degrees W, between latitude 70 degrees N, and latitude 53 degrees N, or during any training, test, or ferry flight.
( f ) Without regard to any other provision of this part, an alternate electrical power supply is not required for airborne thunderstorm detection equipment.
[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-20, 51 FR 40710, Nov. 7, 1986; Amdt. 135-60, 61 FR 2616, Jan. 26, 1996]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3009-1 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:03:06 Desc:Exhibit A - Notice of Appearance Page 1 of 3Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3009-1 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:03:06 Desc:Exhibit A - Notice of Appearance Page 2 of 3Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3009-1 Filed:05/04/18 Entered:05/04/18 10:03:06 Desc:Exhibit A - Notice of Appearance Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>






<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                           
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                              0000797917
<NAME>                             RAYTECH CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                         U.S. DOLLARS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       APR-04-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    1
   
<CASH>                             6,281
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      31,748
<ALLOWANCES>                       1,226
<INVENTORY>                        32,599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   78,030
<PP&E>                             166,062
<DEPRECIATION>                     92,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     176,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              66,579
<BONDS>                            0
<COMMON>                           5,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                         63,302 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       176,897
<SALES>                            67,343 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   67,343 
<CGS>                              50,817 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      50,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 437  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    7,599  
<INCOME-TAX>                       2,505
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                4,488
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       4,488
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                      1.29



    

</TABLE>
§ 125.205 Equipment requirements: Airplanes under IFR. No person may operate an airplane under IFR unless it has— ( a ) A vertical speed indicator;
( b ) A free-air temperature indicator;
( c ) A heated pitot tube for each airspeed indicator;
( d ) A power failure warning device or vacuum indicator to show the power available for gyroscopic instruments from each power source;
( e ) An alternate source of static pressure for the altimeter and the airspeed and vertical speed indicators;
( f ) At least two generators each of which is on a separate engine, or which any combination of one-half of the total number are rated sufficiently to supply the electrical loads of all required instruments and equipment necessary for safe emergency operation of the airplane; and
( g ) Two independent sources of energy (with means of selecting either), of which at least one is an engine-driven pump or generator, each of which is able to drive all gyroscopic instruments and installed so that failure of one instrument or source does not interfere with the energy supply to the remaining instruments or the other energy source. For the purposes of this paragraph, each engine-driven source of energy must be on a different engine.
( h ) For the purposes of paragraph (f) of this section, a continuous inflight electrical load includes one that draws current continuously during flight, such as radio equipment, electrically driven instruments, and lights, but does not include occasional intermittent loads.
( i ) An airspeed indicating system with heated pitot tube or equivalent means for preventing malfunctioning due to icing.
( j ) A sensitive altimeter.
( k ) Instrument lights providing enough light to make each required instrument, switch, or similar instrument easily readable and installed so that the direct rays are shielded from the flight crewmembers' eyes and that no objectionable reflections are visible to them. There must be a means of controlling the intensity of illumination unless it is shown that nondimming instrument lights are satisfactory.
#### § 215.2 Purpose.

This part sets rules under which direct air carriers may use the names in their operating authorizations and change those names. It further provides for notification to air carriers that may be affected by the use by other air carriers of the same or similar names. Its purpose is to place the responsibility for resolving private disputes about the use of similar names with the air carriers involved, through recourse to the trade names statutes and the courts. These rules do not preclude Department intervention or enforcement action should there be evidence of a significant potential for, or of actual, public confusion.
#### § 141.61 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes the requirements for the issuance of examining authority to the holder of a pilot school certificate, and the privileges and limitations of that examining authority.
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, James Clark, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A ofCritical Path, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstance under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 16, 2004         /s/ JAMES CLARK   James Clark   Chief Financial Officer andExecutive Vice President   
131
US Fish & Wildlife Service

Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge
Jefferson County, CO

Li |e<}e}

1

+e

a
—
~
Regional Trails tts
Open Space Permitted Trail Uses December 2003 N
Surrounding Trail Facilities Hiking
ing Trail -- Soft Surface Biking

isting Trail -- Paved Equestrian
== Proposed Trail

= tina Trail Note: Permitted uses for proposed trails
¢ Existing Trailhead have not been determined
Proposed Trailhead

@G DOE Retained Area (Subject to Change)

Figure no. 21
#### § 133.13 Duration of certificate.

Unless sooner surrendered, suspended, or revoked, a Rotorcraft External-Load Operator Certificate expires at the end of the twenty-fourth month after the month in which it is issued or renewed.

[Doc. No. 15176, 42 FR 24198, May 12, 1977, as amended by Amdt. 133-7, 42 FR 32531, June 27, 1977; Amdt. 133-9, 51 FR 40707, Nov. 7, 1986]
§ 17.19 Motions practice and dismissal or summary decision of protests. ( a ) Separate motions generally are discouraged in ODRA bid protests. Counsel and parties are encouraged to incorporate any such motions in their respective agency responses or comments. Parties and counsel are encouraged to attempt to resolve typical motions issues through the ODRA ADR process. The ODRA may rule on any non-dispositive motion, where appropriate and necessary, after providing an opportunity for briefing on the motion by all affected parties. Unjustifiable, inappropriate use of motions may result in the imposition of sanctions. Where appropriate, a party may request by dispositive motion to the ODRA, or the ODRA may recommend or order, that: ( 1 ) The protest, or any count or portion of a protest, be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, timeliness, or standing to pursue the protest;
( 2 ) The protest, or any count or portion of a protest, be dismissed, if frivolous or without basis in fact or law, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be had;
( 3 ) A summary decision be issued with respect to the protest, or any count or portion of a protest, if there are no material facts in dispute and a party is entitled to summary decision as a matter of law.
( b ) In connection with consideration of possible dismissal or summary decision, the ODRA shall consider any material facts in dispute, in a light most favorable to the party against whom the dismissal or summary decision would operate and draw all factual inferences in favor of the non-moving party.
( c ) Either upon motion by a party or on its own initiative, the ODRA may, at any time, exercise its discretion to: ( 1 ) Recommend to the Administrator dismissal or the issuance of a summary decision with respect to the entire protest;
( 2 ) Dismiss the entire protest or issue a summary decision with respect to the entire protest, if delegated that authority by the Administrator; or
( 3 ) Dismiss or issue a summary decision with respect to any count or portion of a protest.
( d ) A dismissal or summary decision regarding the entire protest by either the Administrator, or the ODRA by delegation, shall be construed as a final agency order. A dismissal or summary decision that does not resolve all counts or portions of a protest shall not constitute a final agency order, unless and until such dismissal or decision is incorporated or otherwise adopted in a decision by the Administrator (or the ODRA, by delegation) regarding the entire protest.
( e ) Prior to recommending or entering either a dismissal or a summary decision, either in whole or in part, the ODRA shall afford all parties against whom the dismissal or summary decision is to be entered the opportunity to respond to the proposed dismissal or summary decision.
§ 234.10 Voluntary disclosure of on-time performance codes. ( a ) Any air carrier may determine, in accordance with the provisions of § 234.8 of this part, the on-time performance codes for the flights for which it voluntarily provides flight information to the Department pursuant to § 234.7 of this part.
( b ) A carrier may supply these additional on-time performance codes to system vendors at the same time and in the same manner as the required disclosures are made to system vendors, provided that voluntary disclosures must continue for a period of not less than 12 consecutive months, and must be supplied either ( 1 ) For each of the carrier's reportable flights and each of its single plane one-stop or multi-stop flights, or portions thereof, that it holds out to the public through a CRS, the last segment of which is a reportable flight or
( 2 ) For each of the carrier's domestic flights.