EXHIBIT 3

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2891-3 Filed:04/11/18 Entered:04/11/18 18:06:54 Desc:

 

Exhibit 3 Page 1 of 8
TABLE III

CASES WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PENDING RESOLUTION

Before the PRHTA Appeals Board

(Stayed pursuant to PROMESA Title III proceedings,

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS, US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico)

Case No.

Caption

File Date

Nature of Claim Answer and Defenses 

by PRHTA and other 

filings by the parties

Discovery

(Both Parties)

(Date)

Status Hearings 

and/or 

Conferences

Proposed Pre-Trial 

Order and Pre-Trial 

Conference

Full Hearing Resolution Other relevant 

Information

2012-CT-056

Barbosa Vélez, Cecilia

September 13, 2012-

Appeal filed

Reclassification 

of Position 

October 11, 2012 –

PRHTA filed its 

Answer to Appeal

Both Parties 

October 16, 

2012

Concluded.

None None May 20, 2016 –Vacated . 

The parties informed that 

they were holding settlement 

conversations/negotiations. 

Pending 1/sept/2016- Settlement 

Confidential Agreement 

executed by the Parties

The Appellant has not 

filed the Motion for 

Voluntary Dismissal 

because the PRTH has 

not certified compliance 

with the obligations 

assumed as peer the 

settlement agreement. 

2012-ACT-035

Ferreira Merced, 

Giovanna

July 18, 2012-

Appeal filed

Reclassification 

of Position 

August 3, 2012 –

PRHTA filed its 

Answer to the Appeal

September 12 2017 –

Execution of the 

Settlement Agreement

Discovery 

concluded for 

both Parties on 

2012.

December 4, 2012-

Status Conference

October 29, 2015-

Status Conference

None February 18, 2016 – Vacated 

as per joint request by the 

parties who informed they 

were holding settlement 

conversations/negotiations.

Pending

May 12, 2017 

– Board 

ordered the 

parties to 

report the 

status of the 

case.

September 2016-

Settlement Confidential 

Agreement signed by 

the Parties

The Appellant has not 

filed the Motion of 

Withdrawal of the case 

because the PRTH has 

not certified that have 

enforced the Agreement

May 30, 2017 – The 

Appellant informed the 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2891-3 Filed:04/11/18 Entered:04/11/18 18:06:54 Desc:

 

Exhibit 3 Page 2 of 8
TABLE III

CASES WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PENDING RESOLUTION

Before the PRHTA Appeals Board

(Stayed pursuant to PROMESA Title III proceedings,

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS, US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico)

Forum about the 

transaction agreement 

and efforts to 

corroborate and finalize 

the agreed agreements.

2012-ACT-038

Fernández Rivera, Gloria 

S.

August 3, 2012

Appeal

Reclasification August 21, 2012 - P 

Apelada

September 28, 

2012 –

Discovery

October 3, 2012 

– PRTH answer 

discovery

October 9, 2012 

– Appellant 

answer 

discovery

October 16, 

2012 Appellant 

answer 

discovery

September 12, 

2013 –

Appellant. 

requested the 

conclusion of 

discovery and 

the scheduling 

of a hearing.

December 4, 2012-

Staus Conferenc

Octubre 29, 2015 –

Staus Conference

Pre Trial Orden 

December 4, 2012

16 de febrero de 2016. Pending

May 12, 2017 

– Board 

ordered the 

parties to 

report the 

status of the 

case.

September 2016-

Settlement Confidential 

Agreement signed by 

the Parties

The Appellant has not 

filed the Motion of 

Withdrawal of the case 

because the PRTH has 

not certified that have 

enforced the Agreement

May 30, 2017 – The 

Appellant informed the 

Board about the 

existence of the 

settlement agreement 

and its efforts to 

confirm the terms of the 

same.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2891-3 Filed:04/11/18 Entered:04/11/18 18:06:54 Desc:

 

Exhibit 3 Page 3 of 8
TABLE III

CASES WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PENDING RESOLUTION

Before the PRHTA Appeals Board

(Stayed pursuant to PROMESA Title III proceedings,

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS, US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico)

2012-ACT-057

Ortíz Ortíz, Wanda

September 14, 2012-

Appeal filed

Request for 

Reclassification 

of Position

November 28, 2012 –

PRHTA’s Answer to 

Appeal

January 16, 

2013 –

Appellant’s

notified written 

discovery

Discovery 

concluded

None None None None September 6, 2016 

Confidential Agreement 

executed by the Parties

The Appellant has not 

filed the Motion for 

Voluntary Dismissal 

because the PRTH has 

not certified it will 

comply with its 

obligations pursuant to 

the Agreement

2012-ACT-047

Santiago Adorno, Blanca 

I.

September 5, 2012

Appeal filed

Request for 

Reclassification 

of Position

September 19, 2012 –

PRHTA’s Answer to 

Appeal

September 19, 

2012 – PRHTA

September 26, 

2016 –

Appellant

October 19, 

2012 –

Appellant’s 

answer

November 26, 

2012 –

PRHTA’s 

answer

January 22, 2014-

Status conference

May 12, 2014 –

Status conference

None May 11, 2016 Pending September 1, 2016 –

Confidential Settlement 

Agreement executed by 

the Parties

The Appellant has not 

filed the Motion for 

Voluntary Dismissal 

because the PRTH has 

failed to certify it will 

comply with its 

obligations pursuant to 

the Agreement.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2891-3 Filed:04/11/18 Entered:04/11/18 18:06:54 Desc:

 

Exhibit 3 Page 4 of 8
TABLE III

CASES WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PENDING RESOLUTION

Before the PRHTA Appeals Board

(Stayed pursuant to PROMESA Title III proceedings,

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS, US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico)

May 14, 2014 –

discovery 

concluded

2012-ACT-002

Santiago Guzmán, 

Merari

March 7, 2012

Appeal

March 13, 2012 –

Amended Appeal filed 

Request for 

Reclassification 

of Position

May 30, 2012 –

PRHTA’s Answer to 

Appeal

June 1, 2012 –

PRHTA

August 15, 2012 

– Appellant’s 

answer

September 28, 

2012 –

Appellant

October 18, 

2012 –

PRHTA’s 

answer

Discovery 

concluded for 

both Parties

January 15, 2013 -

status conference

October 29, 2015-

Status conference

None None None September, 2016 -

Confidential Agreement 

signed by the Parties

The Appellant has not 

filed the Motion for 

Voluntary Dismissal 

because the PRTH has 

failed to certify it will 

comply with its 

obligations pursuant to 

the Agreement/

2014-ACT-017

Torres Cruz, Miguel

October 23, 2014

Appeal

Request for 

Reclassification 

of Position

September 2, 2015 - 

PRHTA’s Answer to 

Appeal

None None None None None April 2016 -

Confidential Agreement 

executed by the Parties

The Appellant has not 

filed the Motion for 

Voluntary Dismissal 

because the PRTH has 

failed to certify it will 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2891-3 Filed:04/11/18 Entered:04/11/18 18:06:54 Desc:

 

Exhibit 3 Page 5 of 8
TABLE III

CASES WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PENDING RESOLUTION

Before the PRHTA Appeals Board

(Stayed pursuant to PROMESA Title III proceedings,

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS, US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico)

comply with its 

obligations pursuant to 

the Agreement

2012-ACT-061

López Abril, Rafael

September 25, 2012

Appeal

Request for 

Reclassification 

of Position

October 17, 2012 –

PRHTA Answer to 

Appeal

November 28, 

2012 –

Appellants 

Answer

October 29, 2014 –

Status Conference

May 22, 2014 – Pre -Trial 

Order- Report

April 13, 2016 – suspended Pending September 1, 2016 –

Confidential Agreement 

signed by the Parties

The Appellant has not 

filed the Motion of 

Withdrawal of the case 

because the PRTH has 

failed to certify it will 

comply with its 

obligations pursuant to 

the terms of the 

agreement. 

2012-ACT-040

Núñez Rivera, Bernice

August 3, 2012

Appeal filed

Request for 

Reclassification 

of Position

August 17, 2012 –

PRHTA’s Answer to 

Appeal

August 17, 2012 

–PRHTA’s

September 12 y 

27, 2012 –

Appellant’s

October 3, 2012 

-PRHTA’s 

answer

October 19, 

2012 –

Appellant’s 

answer

December 11, 2012 

– Status 

Conference

None June 1, 2016 – without effect pending September 1, 2016 -

Confidential Agreement 

signed by the Parties

The Appellant has not 

filed the Motion of 

Withdrawal of the case 

because the PRTH has 

failed to certify it will 

comply with its 

obligations pursuant to 

the terms of the 

agreement.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2891-3 Filed:04/11/18 Entered:04/11/18 18:06:54 Desc:

 

Exhibit 3 Page 6 of 8
TABLE III

CASES WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PENDING RESOLUTION

Before the PRHTA Appeals Board

(Stayed pursuant to PROMESA Title III proceedings,

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS, US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico)

2012-ACT-037

Gonzalez Class, Carmen

February 11, 2016

Appeal

Request for 

Reclassification 

of Position

August 21, 2012 –

PRHTA Answer to 

Appeal

September 6, 

2012 – PRHTA 

Discovery 

Request

September 13 

and 27, 2012 –

Appellants 

Discovery 

Request

November 1, 

2012 –

Appellants 

Answer

Discovery 

completed

December 4, 2012 

– status conference

October 30, 2014 –

status conference

October 29, 2015 –

status conference

June 24, 2016 – agreement 

presented to JA

May 23, 2017 – Appellant 

asked for a waiver 

February 11, 2016 – 20 days 

for the presentation of the 

agreement

Confidential Agreement 

signed by the Parties

The Appellant has not 

filed the Motion of 

Withdrawal of the case 

because the PRTH has 

not certified that have 

enforced the Agreement

2008-ACT-008

Juan Hernández Rivera 

June 13, 2008-

Appeal filed

Claim for 

Reimbursement 

of Travel 

Expenses and Per 

Diem

The PRHTA filed its 

Answer to the AppealDecember 29, 2008. 

Many Status 

conferences held 

None None None On July, 2013 PRHTA

and the Appellant 

executed a Settlement 

Agreement and Release 

providing for a payment 

of $3,500.00 dollars to 

by the PRHTA to the 

Appellant. The 

Agreement was signed 

on behalf of the PRHTA

by then Legal Counsel 

of the agency Antonio 

Adrover, ESQ. The 

attorney who 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2891-3 Filed:04/11/18 Entered:04/11/18 18:06:54 Desc:

 

Exhibit 3 Page 7 of 8
TABLE III

CASES WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PENDING RESOLUTION

Before the PRHTA Appeals Board

(Stayed pursuant to PROMESA Title III proceedings,

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS, US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico)

represented the agency 

before the Appeals 

Board did not sign the 

agreement. Later, the 

agency retracted from 

the agreement. Before 

the Board issued its stay 

order, the case was 

active with a pending 

controversy over the 

amendment of the 

Appeal. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2891-3 Filed:04/11/18 Entered:04/11/18 18:06:54 Desc:

 

Exhibit 3 Page 8 of 8