alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM OF STOCK OPTION AWARD


Exhibit 4.5 
 
PROGRESS ENERGY, INC. 
NONQUALIFIED 
STOCK OPTION AWARD 
UNDER THE 
PROGRESS ENERGY, INC. 2002 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 
You have been granted the following Option to purchase shares of common stock of Progress Energy, Inc. (the “Shares”),
subject to the conditions in the attached Stock Option Agreement (the “Agreement”) as authorized by the Organization and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Progress Energy, Inc.:

 

	 Name of Optionee: 
	  	

	
	 Social Security Number: 
	  	

	
	 Total Number of Shares Subject to Option: 
	  	

	
	 Type of Option:
	  	 Nonqualified Stock Option


	
	 Exercise Price Per Share: 
	  	

	
	 Date of Grant: 
	  	

	
	 Vesting Commencement Date: 
	  	


 

	 Date Exercisable:
	  	 This Option becomes vested and exercisable (“Vested”) with respect to the first one-third
(1/3) of the
 Option Shares when the Optionee completes twelve (12) months of Continuous Service (as defined in
 the Agreement) after the Vesting Commencement Date. This Option becomes Vested with respect to
 an additional one-third (1/3) of the Option Shares when the Optionee completes twenty-four (24)
 months of Continuous Service after the Vesting Commencement Date and will become fully Vested
 following completion of thirty-six (36) months of Continuous Service after the Vesting
 Commencement Date.


 

	
	 Expiration Date: 
	 	

	 	 	 PROGRESS ENERGY, INC.

	
	 	 	 By:

	
	 	 	 Name:
 Title:


 
By your
signature below, you accept this Option and acknowledge and agree that this Option is granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the Progress Energy, Inc. 2002 Equity Incentive Plan and the Stock Option Agreement, Reference Number
             , both of which are attached to and made a part of this document. 
 
OPTIONEE: 
 
 

Signature 
Print Name:
#### § 1261.309 Action under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Where a claim is to be acted upon pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, action shall be taken in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 2672, other provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act as may be applicable (e.g., 28 U.S.C. 2680), and regulations prescribed by the Attorney General which appear at 28 CFR part 14.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.84

                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
                                 MIRANT SERVICES
                         SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION PLAN

         WHEREAS, on March 28, 2001, Mirant Services, LLC (the "Company")
adopted the Mirant Services Supplemental Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), to
compensate a specific group of Employees for their loss of eligibility for
benefits under the Mirant Services Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and
the Mirant Services Supplemental Benefit Plan following the spin-off of Mirant
Corporation from The Southern Company; and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6.3 of the Plan, the Board of Managers of
the Company (the "Board") has the authority to amend the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Board has delegated its authority to amend the Plan,
provided such amendment does not have a material effect on the cost of the Plan,
to the Americas Benefits Committee (the "Committee"); and

         WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to reflect amendments
to the Mirant Services Supplemental Benefit Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Committee has determined that the above amendment would
not have a material effect on the cost of the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows, to be
effective as of September 30, 2002:

                                       I.

         THE LAST SENTENCE OF SECTION 4.2 OF THE PLAN SHALL BE DELETED IN ITS
ENTIRETY AND REPLACED WITH THE FOLLOWING NEW SENTENCE:

                  The terms and provisions of the Mirant SERP and the Mirant
SBP, as such plans may be amended from time to time, are hereby incorporated
into the Plan to the extent necessary to determine a Participant's Bonus
hereunder.

                                       II.

         ALL PARTS OF THE PLAN NOT INCONSISTENT HERE WITH ARE HEREBY RATIFIED
AND CONFIRMED.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mirant Services, LLC, through its duly authorized
officer pursuant to a unanimous consent of the Committee dated September 30,
2002, has adopted this Second Amendment to the Mirant Services Supplemental
Compensation Plan, this 30th day of September, 2002 to be effective September
30, 2002.

                                          MIRANT SERVICES, LLC:



                                          By:    /s/ Dianne W. Davenport
                                              ---------------------------------
                                                     Dianne W. Davenport
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7564

ORLANDO DAVID ALMOND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JAMES M. SISK, Manager, Intake & Legal Services,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate

Judge. (3:08-cv-00138-MHL)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando David Almond, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Bland Curwood, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Orlando David Almond appeals the magistrate judge’s 

order∗

AFFIRMED

dismissing as untimely filed Almond’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Almond v. Sisk, No. 3:08-cv-00138-MHL 

(E.D. Va. Aug. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

 ∗ The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s 

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
# Official Journal L 298/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 298 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6311 September 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 298

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6311 September 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1267 of 10 September 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2020/1268 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 on the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2020 to provide continued humanitarian support to refugees in Turkey | 21 |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1269 of 10 September 2020 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 23 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1267 of 10 September 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2020/1268 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 on the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2020 to provide continued humanitarian support to refugees in Turkey

21

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1269 of 10 September 2020 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

23

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                 GLOBAL CROSSING HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
           RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
                                 (in thousands)
                                  (unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Historical
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                                              For the Period
                                                              March 19, 1997
                                   Year Ended   Year Ended  (Date of Inception)
                                  December 31, December 31,   to December 31,
                                      1999         1998            1997
                                  ------------ ------------ -------------------
<S>                               <C>          <C>          <C>
FIXED CHARGES:
 Interest on debt and
  capitalized leases and
  amortization of deferred
  finance fees...................  $ 118,881     $ 42,880        $    --
 Interest element of rentals.....     13,705          202               2
 Interest capitalized............     67,371       49,933             --
                                   ---------     --------        --------
   TOTAL.........................  $ 199,957     $ 93,015        $      2
                                   =========     ========        ========
PREFERRED DIVIDENDS:
 Amount..........................  $  52,500     $ 12,681        $ 12,690
                                   =========     ========        ========
 Gross up to pretax based on
  42.22% effective tax rate
  (except for 1997
  information)...................  $  90,862     $ 21,947        $ 12,690
                                   =========     ========        ========
EARNINGS:
 Income before cumulative effect
  of change in accounting
  principle and extraordinary
  item...........................  $ (12,198)    $(29,406)       $   (160)
 Add back:
   Provision for income taxes....     34,290       33,067             --
   Equity in (income) loss of
    affiliates...................    (10,755)       2,508             --
   Capitalized interest included
    in cost of capacity sold.....     43,493        9,128             --
   Fixed charges less interest
    capitalized..................    132,586       43,082               2
                                   ---------     --------        --------
     TOTAL.......................  $ 187,416     $ 58,379        $   (158)
                                   =========     ========        ========
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
 CHARGES.........................        --           --              --
EXCESS OF FIXED CHARGES OVER
 EARNINGS........................  $ (12,541)    $(34,636)       $   (160)
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
 CHARGES AND PREFERRED
 DIVIDENDS.......................        --           --              --
EXCESS FIXED CHARGES AND
 PREFERRED DIVIDENDS OVER
 EARNINGS........................  $(103,403)    $(56,583)       $(12,850)
</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES v. HELVETIA MILK CONDENSING CO.

[77 C.Cls. 743; 290 U.S. 671]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court; October 16, 1933.
# IMMC.EESC-2020-05838-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2020-05838-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

EN

TEN/738

TEN/738

Basic air connectivity following the end of the transition period

Basic air connectivity following the end of the transition period

OPINION


  European Economic and Social Committee


  Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules ensuring basic air connectivity following the end of the transition period mentioned in the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules ensuring basic air connectivity following the end of the transition period mentioned in the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community

[COM(2020) 827 final - 2020/0363 (COD)]

[COM(2020) 827 final - 2020/0363 (COD)]

Referrals

| Referrals | Council of the European Union, 11/12/2020


  European Parliament, 14/12/2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 100(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society |
| Adopted at plenary | 27/01/2021 |
| Plenary session No | 557 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | unanimous |

Referrals

Council of the European Union, 11/12/2020

Council of the European Union, 11/12/2020

European Parliament, 14/12/2020

European Parliament, 14/12/2020

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 100(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 100(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

27/01/2021

27/01/2021

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

557

557

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

unanimous

unanimous

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 557th plenary session of 27 and 28 January 2021 (meeting of 27 January), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 557th plenary session of 27 and 28 January 2021 (meeting of 27 January), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Christa SCHWENG

Christa SCHWENG

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________

_____________
#### E. E. Ropes, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The Florida Fish & Produce Company, *Defendant in Error.*

Where a party is conducting his own case in court and suddenly becomes insensible from an attach of heart failure so as to render him unfit to properly protect his rights, the court should pursuant to section 1489 of the General Statutes of 1906 adjourn the cause to such time as would be proper under the circumstances.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Volusia County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*E. E. Ropes,*in pro per;

*Landis*& *Fish,*for Defendant in Error.

Whitfield, C. J.

Ropes brought an action of ejectment against the company. The bill of exceptions shows that at the trial a deed was offered in evidence for the defendant, whereupon the plaintiff said “I claim that this conveys no title” and “Í object.” “Then plaintiff had an attack of heart failure, and became insensible. When he came to he was unfit for business, and the court then instructed the jury to find a verdict for the defen*445dant, and told the plaintiff to move for a new trial, which he did the next day.” A motion for new trial was made and it was continued by the court. Subsequently another judge of the court was commissioned and he denied the motion for new trial. Under the circumstances disclosed by the record a new trial should have been granted. At the trial when the plaintiff who was conducting his own case, became unconscious, the court may well have adjourned the cause to such time as would have enabled the plaintiff to properly protect his interests so that justice may be done as contemplated by Section 1489 of the General Statutes.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial awarded.

Shackleford, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur

Taylor, J., absent on account of illness.
§ 1300.15 Loan terms. ( a ) A loan guaranteed under the program shall be due and payable in full no later than seven years from the date on which the first disbursement of the loan is made.
( b ) Loans guaranteed under the program must bear a rate of interest determined by the Board to be reasonable. In determining the reasonableness of an interest rate, the Board shall consider the percentage of the guarantee, any collateral, other loan terms, and current average yields on outstanding obligations of the United States with maturity comparable to the term of the loan guaranteed. The Board may reject an application to guarantee a loan if it determines the interest rate on such loan to be unreasonable.
( c ) An eligible lender may assess and collect from the borrower such other fees and costs associated with the application and origination of the loan as are reasonable and customary, taking into consideration the amount and complexity of the credit. The Board may take such other fees and costs into consideration when determining whether to offer a guarantee to the lender.
§ 121.358 Low-altitude windshear system equipment requirements. ( a ) *Airplanes manufactured after January 2, 1991.* No person may operate a turbine-powered airplane manufactured after January 2, 1991, unless it is equipped with either an approved airborne windshear warning and flight guidance system, an approved airborne detection and avoidance system, or an approved combination of these systems.
( b ) *Airplanes manufactured before January 3, 1991.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, after January 2, 1991, no person may operate a turbine-powered airplane manufactured before January 3, 1991 unless it meets one of the following requirements as applicable. ( 1 ) The makes/models/series listed below must be equipped with either an approved airborne windshear warning and flight guidance system, an approved airborne detection and avoidance system, or an approved combination of these systems: ( i ) A-300-600;
( ii ) A-310—all series;
( iii ) A-320—all series;
( iv ) B-737-300, 400, and 500 series;
( v ) B-747-400;
( vi ) B-757—all series;
( vii ) B-767—all series;
( viii ) F-100—all series;
( ix ) MD-11—all series; and
( x ) MD-80 series equipped with an EFIS and Honeywell-970 digital flight guidance computer.
( 2 ) All other turbine-powered airplanes not listed above must be equipped with as a minimum requirement, an approved airborne windshear warning system. These airplanes may be equipped with an approved airborne windshear detection and avoidance system, or an approved combination of these systems.
( c ) *Extension of the compliance date.* A certificate holder may obtain an extension of the compliance date in paragraph (b) of this section if it obtains FAA approval of a retrofit schedule. To obtain approval of a retrofit schedule and show continued compliance with that schedule, a certificate holder must do the following: ( 1 ) Submit a request for approval of a retrofit schedule by June 1, 1990, to the appropriate Flight Standards division manager in the responsible Flight Standards office.
( 2 ) Show that all of the certificate holder's airplanes required to be equipped in accordance with this section will be equipped by the final compliance date established for TCAS II retrofit.
( 3 ) Comply with its retrofit schedule and submit status reports containing information acceptable to the Administrator. The initial report must be submitted by January 2, 1991, and subsequent reports must be submitted every six months thereafter until completion of the schedule. The reports must be submitted to the certificate holder's assigned Principal Avionics Inspector.
( d ) *Definitions.* For the purposes of this section the following definitions apply— ( 1 ) *Turbine-powered airplane* includes, e.g., turbofan-, turbojet-, propfan-, and ultra-high bypass fan-powered airplanes. The definition specifically excludes turbopropeller-powered airplanes.
( 2 ) An airplane is considered manufactured on the date the inspection acceptance records reflect that the airplane is complete and meets the FAA Approved Type Design data.
[Doc. No. 25954, 55 FR 13242, Apr. 9, 1990, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 121-380, 83 FR 9173, Mar. 5, 2018]
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of NT Holding Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James Loo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 14, 2006    /S/ James Loo ------------- James Loo Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 24852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10708]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 82 / Thursday, April 27, 2000 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 24852]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2000-19 of April 21, 
                2000

                
Waiver and Certification of Statutory Provisions 
                Regarding the Palestine Liberation Organization

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me under section 
                538(d) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and 
                Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2000, as contained 
                in the Consolidated Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 
                2000 (Public Law 106-113), I hereby determine and 
                certify that it is important to the national security 
                interests of the United States to waive the provisions 
                of section 1003 of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987, 
                Public Law 100-204.

                This waiver shall be effective for a period of 6 months 
                from the date of this memorandum. You are hereby 
                authorized and directed to transmit this determination 
                to the Congress and to publish it in the Federal 
                Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, April 21, 2000.

[FR Doc. 00-10708
Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-M