alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BOARD: BOARD: 

# D H E C Henry C. Scon: Pau I C. A ughtry, Ill Chairman M. David Mitchell , MD Edwi n H

. Cooper, lll Vice C hairman 

# rld C

Glenn A. McCall PROM OTE PROTE C T PRO PER reven G. Ki sner Secremry C. Earl Hunter , Com miss ioner Col eman F. Buckhouse, MD Promoting andpmtecting the health of thepublic and the environment
July 18, 2011

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, Esq. , Regional Administrator U

.S. EPA, Region 4 Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-8960
Re : Annual Air Network Monitoring Plan for 2012
Dear Ms. Keyes Fleming:
In accordance with the requirements of 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 58 , Subpart B , the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (Department) respectfully submits the Annual Air Network Monitoring Plan for calendar year 2012. The Department is required by 40 CFR 58.10 to adopt and submit to the Regional Administrator an Annual Monitoring Network Plan which provides for the establishment and maintenance ofan air quality surveillance system. This system is a network of State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) including Federal Reference Method (FRM) and Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) monitors that are part of SLAMS, National Core Monitoring Network (NCore) stations , Speciation Trends Network (STN) stations, and Special Purpose Monitor (SPM) monitoring stations. This plan is required to include a statement of purpose for each monitor and evidence that siting and operation ofeach monitor meets the requirements of40 CFR 58, Appendices A, C, D and E

. The Department received several comments during the public comment period, which was held from June 2, 2011 through July 1, 2011. A complete package, including the Department's response to comments received is being sent to Doug Neeley ofyour office. Should you have any questions or need additional information regarding this matter, please contact Robert Brown ofmy staffat (803) 898-4105.

Robert W. King, Jr. , P.E

. Deputy Commissioner Environmental Quality Control

cc: Doug Neeley, US EPA Region 4 (w/attacbments)

ec: David McNeal, US EPA Region 4 (w/attachments) Carol Kemker, US EPA Region 4 (w/o attachments) Myra Reece, BAQ (w/o attachments) Robert Brown, BAQ (w/o attachments) Scott Reynolds, BES (w/o attachments)

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 2600Bu 11 Street • Columbia,SC29201 • Phone:(803)898-3432 • www.scdhec.gov
§ 25.1167 Accessory gearboxes. For airplanes equipped with an accessory gearbox that is not certificated as part of an engine— ( a ) The engine with gearbox and connecting transmissions and shafts attached must be subjected to the tests specified in § 33.49 or § 33.87 of this chapter, as applicable;
( b ) The accessory gearbox must meet the requirements of §§ 33.25 and 33.53 or 33.91 of this chapter, as applicable; and
( c ) Possible misalignments and torsional loadings of the gearbox, transmission, and shaft system, expected to result under normal operating conditions must be evaluated.
[Amdt. 25-38, 41 FR 55467, Dec. 20, 1976]
06/22/2012 15:12 '2023313933 KIRSTEIN&YOUI-IGPLLC: . PAGE 02/ El4 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL A VIA TJON. ADMINIS'TRATION 

') 

I'D the Matter of: ) FDMS NO. FAA~2012 .. 0468 

) 

Aero Micronesia, Inc. ) FAA CASE NO 2011wP350018 

dba Asia Pacific Airlines ) 

) 

ResP,ondent ) 

TO: CHIEF JUDGE RONNIE A. YODER 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Respondent, Aero Micronesia, Inc. dba Asia Pacific Airlines, herby notifies the United 

States Department of T1·ansportc.'\tiou, Office of Hearings, and the Complainant, pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. § 13;204(b), that it shall be represe11ted in the above~stated action by the following 

atte>meys: 

1100/(;00 ~ 

David M. Kirstein 

Joanne W. Young 

Lyndsey M.. Grunewald 

F.;itstein & YouAJg, PLLC 

1750 K Street NW, Suite 200 

Washington1 DC 20006 

TEL: 202.331.3348 

FAX: 202.331.3933 

dkirstein@yklaw.c()t.n 

jyoung@yklaw.com 

lgmoewald@ykla.w.com. 

s~o + 

1 

G11L98611GOG X~j 1111:so GLOZ/9G/80 
05/22/2012 15:12 2023313933 KlRSTEIN&YOUNGPLLC PAGE El3/04 

All ~ozrununications, notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully requested to be fo1-warded 

as follows: 

David M. Kirstein 

Kirstein & Young, PLLC 

1750 K Street NW, Suite 200 

Washington, DC 20006 

TEL: 202.3 31.3348 

FAX: 202.331.3933 

Respectfully submitted, 

Djited: Julle 22~ 2012 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I ce:t.1ify that on this date l have placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, the 

ex(;cuted origina1 a.n.d faxed one copy of the Notice of Appearance, addressed as follows: 

Federal Aviation Ad.ministratioll 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington. DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur W;dght Building- Suite 2Wl00 

Facsimile: (202) 493-5142 

1 cel."tify that on this date I have placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, a true 

copy ofthe Notice of Appearance, and faxed one copy of the Notice of Appearance, addressed as 

follows: 

2 

P00/800 121 Sl'lO + 6PL~88P606 XV~ pp:so 6L06/~6/90 
06/22/2B12 15:12 2023:::113933 

Don Bobertz, 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Rcgi.on.al Counsel, A WP-7 

:PO Bo" 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

F~:310~725-6816 

Dated: Jtme 22, 2012 

1d 'rstein 

Kir ein & Young, PLLC 

1 50 K Street NW, Suite 200 

Washington, DC 20006 

Coun,selfor Respondem, .4.ero Micronesia, Inc. 

3 

1100/1100 ~ s~o + 

KIRST~IN&YOUNGPLLC 

1l1e Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Departmr;m of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

PAGF P.ld/04 

611L~8611606 X~~ 1111:ao 6L06/~6/80
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 25 29

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ty so n R . W al ke r
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Lean n K. Ber ts ch ; Co lb y Brau n; Sh au n F od e; Jea n S ul li va n; NickFri ez
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ctof No rth Dako ta - Bi sm arck

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 20 , 20 18 Fi le d: Decem

be r 21 , 20 18 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, BOW MAN, an d GRAS Z, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Nor th Dak ot a in m at e Ty so n R. W al ke r a pp eal s th e di st ric t co ur t’s di sm is sa l 1 wit ho ut pr ejud ic e of hi s pr o se 42 U.S.C. § 1 9 8 3 act io n un de r 28 U.S.C. § 19 15 A. Afte r care fu l de no vo rev ie w, se e Co op er v. Sch rir o, 18 9 F.3 d 78 1, 78 3 (8 th Ci r. 19 99 ) (p er cu ria m ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w), we fin d no ba si s fo r rev ers al

. W e co nc lu de th at W al ke r di d no t st at e a du e pr oc es s cl ai m reg ard in g th e pr is on ’s gr ie va nc e syste m , as th e gr ie va nc e pr oc es s do es no t gi ve ris e to a li be rty in te res t req ui rin g du e pr oc es s pr ot ect io n, se e Bu ck le y v. Barl ow, 99 7 F.2 d 49 4, 49 5 (8 th Ci r. 19 93 ) (p er cu ria m ); he di d no t al le ge th at an y sp eci fic de fen da nt was re sp on si bl e fo r hi s p la cem en t i n a sp eci al ad m in is tra ti ve un it , se e Ell is v. Norris , 17 9 F.3 d 10 78 , 10 79 (8 th Ci r. 19 99 );

an d he di d no t st at e a cl ai m reg ard in g th e de pr iv at io n of hi s p r o p e r ty du rin g th at pl acement, as pr is on of fic ia ls m ay li m it pe rs on al pr op er t y in ad m in is tra ti ve
se gr eg at io n, se e Hos na v. Gro os e , 8 0 F

. 3 d 2 9 8, 30 5 (8 th Ci r. 19 96 ). Fu rth er, th e di st ric t cou rt di d no t err in de nyin g l eav e to am en d, beca us e W al ke r’s pr op os ed qu i ta m act io ns un de r th e Fal se Cl ai m s Act (FCA) ag ai ns t de fe n d a n t Bert sc h wou ld be fu ti le ; sp eci fic al ly, th e FCA d oe s n ot su bjec t s ta te ag en ci es to qu i t am li ab il it y , an d W al ke r di d no t al le ge th atBert sc h t oo k a ny acti on s o ut si de th e sc op e of he r du ti es

. See Vt. Age nc y of Nat. Res

. v. U.S. ex rel

. St ev en s, 52 9 U.S. 76 5, 78 7- 88 (2 0 00 ); U.S. ex rel

. Gau di ne er & Co m it o, L.L.P. v. Io wa, 26 9 F.3 d 93 2, 93 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 01 ).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm th e jud gm en t of th e di st ric t co ur t. See 8t h Ci r. R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Ch arl es S. Mi ll er, Jr., Uni te d Stat es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e 1 Dis tri ct of Nor th Dak ot a, to who m th e c a s e was refe rred fo r fin al di sp os it io n by
co ns en t p ur su an t t o 2 8 U.S.C. § 63 6( c).
-2

-
#### 13.83-13.87 [Reserved]
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

PROMESA

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND Title III

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as a representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al. (Jointly Administered)

Debtors

 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

NOW comes creditors MARTA VÁZQUEZ TORRES, NEFTALY MÉNDEZ VÁZQUEZ, 

JOSEPH NEGRÓN VÁZQUEZ, and the SUCCESSION of ARMANDO NEGRÓN VÁZQUEZ

comprised by his heirs, RAYMOND ARMANDO NEGRÓN LÓPEZ and ALONDRA JANISSE 

NEGRÓN SANTANA (represented by their respective mothers, YESENIA INÉS LÓPEZ OSORIO 

and KATHIRIA JANISSE SANTANA PONCE), all represented by the undersigned attorney, to 

state as follows.

That pursuant to provisions of Rule 9010(b) of Bankruptcy Procedure, the appearing party 

notifies that it has retained the legal services of Osvaldo Toledo Martinez whose address is:

Osvaldo Toledo Martínez

PO Box 190938

San Juan PR 00919-0938

E-Mail: toledo.bankruptcy@gmail.com

Telephone No.: (787) 756-6395

Fax No.: (787) 767-7965

WHEREFORE, the appearing party respectfully prays that the Clerk of the Court takes notice of 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3363 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 01:31:48 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

the appearance of the undersigned attorney and to notify him of all the proceedings in this case, 

including but not limited to copies of the petition, schedules, motions, and statements filed or to be filed 

in the above-referenced case and further prays that the name and address be added to the Master 

Address List kept in the above-captioned case.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and exact copy of the foregoing was filed electronically with 

the clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which in turn will send notification of such filing to all 

interested parties of record.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

At San Juan, Puerto Rico, this June 28, 2018.

/S/ Osvaldo Toledo Martínez

OSVALDO TOLEDO MARTÍNEZ, ESQ.

USDC No. 127905

PO Box 190938

San Juan PR 00919-0938

Tel: (787) 756-6395

Fax: (787) 767-7965

E-Mail: toledo.bankruptcy@gmail.com

Counsel for Creditors

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3363 Filed:06/29/18 Entered:06/29/18 01:31:48 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,769,205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  551,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (28,868)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,310,460
<PP&E>                                       3,381,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                (71,057)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,321,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,081,647
<BONDS>                                      3,460,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          485,947
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,284,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,321,773
<SALES>                                        657,660
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               945,110
<CGS>                                          527,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  852,798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               325,401
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                25,002
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,092
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (34,290)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (45,681)
<CHANGES>                                     (14,710)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (72,589)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 17.49 Sanctions.

If any party or its representative fails to comply with an Order or Directive of the ODRA, the ODRA may enter such orders and take such other actions as it deems necessary and in the interest of justice.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 15

- 00530

- CR Abelardo G. GONZALEZ , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 49 th Judicial District Court , Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008CRR000662

- D1 Honorable David Peeples , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 28, 2015
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant Abelardo Gerardo Gonzalez filed a notice of appeal on August 10, 2015, stating he is appealing the denial of his post

- judgment motion to recuse in cause numbers 2008

- CRR

- 657, 2008

- CRR

- 662, and 2008

- CRR

- 665. Th e judgments of conviction in the clerk’s record s , as we ll as the copies of those judgments that Gonzalez provided to the court, show the trial court imposed Gonzalez’s sentences in those causes on January 15, 201 0

. On September 18, 2015, we ordered Gonzalez to show why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. In our order, we noted that “[j] urisdiction must be expressly given04

- 15

- 00530

- CR

- 2

- to the courts of appeals in a statute, ” Ragston v. State , 424 S.W.3 d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), and
“t he standard for determining jurisdiction is not whether the appeal is precluded by law, but whether the appeal is authorized by law.” Abbott v. State , 271 S.W.3d 694, 696

- 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Gonzalez responded stating (1) he has been unable to review the clerk’s record s and therefore cannot know what is wron g with or missing from the m ; (2) he intends to appeal the trial court’s denial of his post

- trial second motion to recuse, which is not an interlocutory order ; and (3) he has exercised due diligence in appealing the trial court’s order. In this case, our jurisdiction depends not upon what is missing from the clerk’s record , but
upon on Gonzalez’s notice of appeal and the judgments of convicti on. W e are unaware of any statute, and Gonzalez does not cite a statute, granting us jurisdiction over Gonzalez’s appeal. The trial court imposed Gonzalez’s sentences on January 15, 201 0 , and Gonzalez’s August 10, 2015
not ice of appeal expressly challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to recuse. Without a statute authorizing this appeal, the order denying a motion to recuse is not appealable and we lack jurisdiction even if Gonzalez exercised due diligence in filing this appeal

. See Ragston , 424 S.W.3d

at 52 ; Abbott , 271 S.W.3d at 696

- 97. Gonzalez has not cited any authority and we are aware o f none authorizing this appeal. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
#### § 25.1395 Maximum intensities in overlapping beams of forward and rear position lights.

No position light intensity may exceed the applicable values in the following table, except as provided in [§ 25.1389(b)(3)](/on/2024-09-19/title-14/section-25.1389#p-25.1389(b)(3)).

| Overlaps | Maximum intensity | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Area A (candles) | Area B (candles) |
| Green in dihedral angle *L* | 10 | 1 |
| Red in dihedral angle *R* | 10 | 1 |
| Green in dihedral angle *A* | 5 | 1 |
| Red in dihedral angle *A* | 5 | 1 |
| Rear white in dihedral angle *L* | 5 | 1 |
| Rear white in dihedral angle *R* | 5 | 1 |

Where—

(a) Area A includes all directions in the adjacent dihedral angle that pass through the light source and intersect the common boundary plane at more than 10 degrees but less than 20 degrees; and

(b) Area B includes all directions in the adjacent dihedral angle that pass through the light source and intersect the common boundary plane at more than 20 degrees.
#### Section 19 Uniform Classification of Operating Statistics
**EXHIBIT99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, Patrick J. Dirk,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report Troy Group, Inc. onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2002 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of TroyGroup, Inc.

 

 
|   | By:                                           | /s/ Patrick J. Dirk |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|   | Name: Patrick J. Dirk                         |
|   | Title: President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit I

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3066-9 Filed:05/15/18 Entered:05/15/18 19:25:07 Desc:

Exhibit I Page 1 of 2
FILED UNDER SEAL

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3066-9 Filed:05/15/18 Entered:05/15/18 19:25:07 Desc:

Exhibit I Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-60188

Summary Calendar

 

KAZEM BARKHORDARIAN,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

A73-712-546

- - - - - - - - - -

February 15, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kazem Barkhordarian petitions this court to review an order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal

seeking reversal of an order of deportation denying his

applications for political asylum, withholding of deportation,

and voluntary departure. We have reviewed the record and the

briefs and determine that the BIA’s denials of Barkhordarian’s

applications for asylum and withholding of deportation are 
No. 98-60188

-2-

supported by substantial evidence. Faddoul v. INS, 37 F.3d 185,

188 (5th Cir. at 1994).

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility

Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, is

applicable to all aliens in proceedings on April 1, 1997, for

whom a final order of deportation was entered more than thirty

days after September 30, 1996. IIRIRA § 309(c)(4)(E); Eyoum v.

INS, 125 F.3d 889, 891 (5th Cir. 1997). Under IIRIRA, this court

lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to review claims for

discretionary relief, such as voluntary departure. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252 (a)(2)(B); Eyoum, 125 F.3d at 891. Because the BIA’s

final order of deportation was entered on March 13, 1998, we lack

subject-matter jurisdiction to review Barkhordarian’s appeal

regarding voluntary departure.

The petition for review is DENIED.
Exhibit 99.18





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection with the following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the technical report entitled “43-101 Technical Report for the Prestea West Reef Feasibility Study, Ghana” effective date May 1, 2013 and filed on July 26, 2013 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2013 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2013, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents and Report in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.








/s/ Anthony Rex


Dr. Anthony Rex





March 25, 2014
#### § 257.4 Unfair and deceptive practice.

The holding out or sale of scheduled passenger air transportation involving a code-sharing arrangement or long-term wet lease is prohibited as unfair and deceptive in violation of 49 U.S.C. 41712 unless, in conjunction with such holding out or sale, carriers and ticket agents follow the requirements of this part.
§ 23.2000 Applicability and definitions. ( a ) This part prescribes airworthiness standards for the issuance of type certificates, and changes to those certificates, for airplanes in the normal category.
( b ) For the purposes of this part, the following definition applies:
*Continued safe flight and landing* means an airplane is capable of continued controlled flight and landing, possibly using emergency procedures, without requiring exceptional pilot skill or strength. Upon landing, some airplane damage may occur as a result of a failure condition.
Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:276-1   Filed:06/08/17   Entered:06/08/17 12:08:00    Desc:Exhibit Payment Receipt   Page 1 of 1
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135034 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135034 

 COA: 280059 

Oakland CC: 2006-207978-FH 

SERAGELDIN AHMED ABDELLATIF, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 14, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 8, 2008 

 Clerk