alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3859 

To extend the covered period for the paycheck protection program, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 1, 2020 

Mrs. LOEFFLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the covered period for the paycheck protection 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Paycheck Protection 

5 Program Timeframe Modification and Extension Act’’ or 

6 the ‘‘PPP TIME Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE PAYCHECK PROTECTION 

8 PROGRAM AND LOAN FORGIVENESS. 

9 (a) EXTENSION OF COVERED PERIOD FOR PAY10 CHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM.—Section 7(a)(36)(A)(iii) 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3859 IS

1 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)(A)(iii)) 

2 is amended by striking ‘‘June 30, 2020’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘August 15, 2020’’. 

4 (b) LOAN FORGIVENESS.—Section 1106 of the 

5 CARES Act (Public Law 116–136) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘the 8-week 

7 period’’ and inserting ‘‘any 8-week period, as se8 lected by an eligible recipient, occurring during the 

9 24-week period’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (d)— 

11 (A) in paragraph (5)(B), by striking ‘‘June 

12 30, 2020’’ each place that term appears and in13 serting ‘‘August 15, 2020’’; 

14 (B) by redesignating paragraph (6) as 

15 paragraph (7); and 

16 (C) by inserting after paragraph (5) the 

17 following: 

18 ‘‘(6) AMOUNT OF PAYROLL COSTS.—For pur19 poses of determining eligibility for and the amount 

20 of loan forgiveness under this section, the Adminis21 trator may not require an eligible recipient to use 

22 more than 50 percent of the proceeds of a covered 

23 loan for payroll costs.’’. 

24 (c) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by this 

25 section shall apply to loans made under section 7(a)(36) 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3859 IS

1 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)) before, 

2 on, or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

3 SEC. 3. DELAY OF PAYMENT OF EMPLOYER PAYROLL 

4 TAXES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2302(a) of the CARES 

6 Act (Public Law 116–136) is amended by striking para7 graph (3). 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall be effective as if included in the 

10 CARES Act (Public Law 116–136) and shall apply to any 

11 loan made pursuant to section 7(a)(36) of the Small Busi12 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)) or section 1109 of the 

13 CARES Act (Public Law 116–136). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0602 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-CE-010-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JAN 28 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

PUBLISH

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

LORNA L. McCARTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

TOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary of the

Army,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-3040

Appeal from United States District Court

for the District of Kansas

(D.C. No. 94-CV-2383)

Submitted on the briefs:

Jeffrey L. Baxter, of Chapman, Waters & Baxter, of Leavenworth, Kansas, for the

appellant.

Jackie N. Williams, United States Attorney, and Janice Miller Karlin, Assistant United

States Attorney, State of Kansas, for the appellee.

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
-2-

Plaintiff Lorna McCarter appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in

favor of defendant Togo West, Jr., Secretary of the Army, on her claims of sex-based and

disability-based employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964 and § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act.

We review the district court's decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Wolf

v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 50 F.3d 793, 796 (10th Cir. 1995). After careful

examination of the record, we conclude the analysis and conclusions set forth in the

district court's memorandum and order granting summary judgment are correct and that

plaintiff's challenge to the decision lacks merit. We therefore adopt the district court's

memorandum and order, McCarter v. West, 910 F. Supp. 519 (D. Kan. 1995), as the

opinion of this court. See Herrera v. International Union, 73 F.3d 1056, 1057 (10th Cir.

1996) (adopting district court's opinion as opinion of court of appeals).

Defendant's motion to strike portions of plaintiff's appendix is GRANTED.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 11

                 STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
          SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                           (Unaudited)
              (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>                                    March 30,  March 31,
                                             1997       1996  
<S>                                        <C>        <C>
Net income used in calculating primary
  and fully diluted earnings per 
  common share.........................     $2,772     $1,583


Primary earnings per common share:

Weighted average shares outstanding....      4,584      4,727
Add shares issuable assuming exercise
  of stock options.....................        427         76

    Weighted average number of shares
      used in calculating primary 
      earnings per common share........      5,011      4,803

  Primary earnings per common share....     $  .55     $  .33

Fully diluted earnings per common share:

Weighted average shares outstanding....      4,584      4,727
Add shares issuable assuming excer-
  cise of stock options................        427         76
    Weighted average number of shares
      used in calculating fully diluted
      earnings per common share........      5,011      4,803
 
  Fully diluted earnings per common
    share.............................      $  .55     $  .33
</TABLE>
§ 151.71 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart prescribes programming and design and construction standards for projects under the Federal-Aid Airport Program to assure the most efficient use of Program funds and to assure that the most important elements of a national system of airports are provided.
( b ) Except for the standards made mandatory by § 151.72(a), the standards prescribed in this subpart that apply to any particular project are those in effect on the date the sponsor accepts the Administrator's offer under § 151.29(c). The standards of § 151.72(a) applicable to a project are those in effect on the date written on the notification of tentative allocation of funds (§ 151.21(b)). Standards that become effective after that date may be applied to the project by agreement between the sponsor and the Administrator.
(Secs. 1-15, 17-21, 60 Stat. 170, 49 U.S.C. 1120)
[Amdt. 151-19, 32 FR 9220, June 29, 1967]
EXHIBIT 32.2-Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
             906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act.






               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing of Australian-Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Robert Kamon, the Chief Financial Officer of the  Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350), that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
       or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of
       operations of the Company.


Dated:   April 14, 2005



 /s/ ROBERT KAMON
---------------------------
Robert Kamon
Chief Financial Officer








                            Exhibit 32.2
Bundy Road

I-94

4th

st1

¤£ US 312

3

Sherrod

ht43

notloC

§¦ ̈

keerCy lF

al Lower Can

Special Designations 

Pompeys Pillar National 

Monument and ACEC

Alternatives B, C, and D

R30E

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Miles

Map 158

90

Y l l o w s t o n e R i v e r

e

T

3

N

Map scale 1:24,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in May 2015

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Pompeys P i llar Cree k

312

94

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Wyoming

Location Map Legend

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Ü

Pompeys Pillar National Monument

Front Country Zone

General Management Zone

Roads

Streams

Bureau of Land Management

Water

Private

Public Lands Survey System
#### § 200.2 Instructions.

The regulations of the Department may be cited by section numbers. For example, this regulation may be cited as “§ 200.2 of the Aviation Economic Regulations.” The sections contained in the Rules of Practice may also be cited by appropriate rule numbers. (See § 302.1(c) of this chapter.) For example, 14 CFR 302.10 may be cited as “rule 10 of the Rules of Practice.”

[Doc. No. 47939, 57 FR 40100, Sept. 2, 1992, as amended at 65 FR 6456, Feb. 9, 2000]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4032 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow above-the-line deductions for charitable contributions for individuals not itemizing deductions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2020 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Mr. COONS, Mr. LEE, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. 

SCOTT of South Carolina, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow abovethe-line deductions for charitable contributions for individuals not itemizing deductions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Universal Giving Pan5 demic Response Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4032 IS

1 SEC. 2. ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION FOR CHARITABLE 

2 CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS NOT 

3 ITEMIZING DEDUCTIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (22) of section 62(a) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

6 as follows: 

7 ‘‘(22) CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INDI8 VIDUALS NOT ITEMIZING DEDUCTIONS.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an indi10 vidual who does not elect to itemize deductions 

11 for the taxable year, the deduction allowed by 

12 section 170 with respect to charitable contribu13 tions (as defined in section 170(c)) made dur14 ing the period beginning on January 1, 2019, 

15 and ending on December 31, 2020. 

16 ‘‘(B) CERTAIN 2020 CONTRIBUTIONS DE17 DUCTIBLE IN 2019.—For purposes of this para18 graph, an individual may elect to treat any 

19 charitable contributions (as so defined) made 

20 after December 31, 2019, and before July 15, 

21 2020, as made in calendar year 2019 (and not 

22 to claim a deduction for such contributions in 

23 2020). 

24 ‘‘(C) AMENDED RETURN PERMITTED.—In 

25 the case of an individual who has filed the re26 turn of tax for 2019 and who did not elect to 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4032 IS

1 itemize deductions on such return, such indi2 vidual may file an amended return for such 

3 year in order to apply subparagraph (A) or to 

4 make the election under clause (i) (or both). 

5 ‘‘(D) LIMITATION.—The deduction to 

6 which subparagraph (A) applies for any taxable 

7 year (after the application of subparagraph 

(B)) shall not exceed an amount equal to 1 8 ⁄3 of 

9 the amount of the standard deduction with re10 spect to such individual for such taxable year.’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 62 of the 

12 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

13 subsection (f). 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to charitable contributions (as de16 fined in section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

17 1986) made after December 31, 2018. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
15

















August 5,
2008








Securities
and Exchange Commission


450 Fifth
Street, N.W.


Washington,
D.C. 20549














Commissioners:





We are
aware that our report dated August 5, 2008 on our review of interim financial
information of Unit Corporation for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and included in the Company’s quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 is incorporated by
reference in its registration statements on Form S-3 (File No.’s 333-104165
and 333-83551) and Form S-8 (File No.’s 33-19652, 33-44103, 33-49724,
33-64323, 33-53542, 333-38166, 333-39584, 333-135194 and
333-137857).





Very
truly yours,





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP


Tulsa,
Oklahoma
# Official Journal C 86I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 086I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6316 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 086I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6316 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 86 I/01 | Covid-19 Guidelines for border management measures to protect health and ensure the availability of goods and essential services | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 86 I/01

Covid-19 Guidelines for border management measures to protect health and ensure the availability of goods and essential services

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Last updated on Tuesday, January 25, 2011. 

## National Estuaries Program http://w ater.epa.gov/type/oceb/nep/fund.cfm You are here: Water Our Waters Oceans, Coasts, Estuaries & Beaches National Estuaries Program Sustainable Financing Strategies 

# Sustainable Financing Strategies On average, the National Estuary Programs (NEPs) raise $15 for every $1 provided by EPA. The NEPs successfully leverage federal seed money by: Developing finance plans Building strategic alliances Demonstrating environmental results Providing seed money or staff to initiate and develop new funding sources such as stormwater utilities.

Over the 2003-2010 period the NEPs leveraged nearly $2.3 billion from $160 million in EPA grants. This additional funding came from a variety of federal, state, local and private sources through such mechanisms as annual membership appeals, license plate revenues, fines and penalties, State appropriations and intergovernmental agreements. There are many sustainable funding examples from the NEPs.

The NEPs use leveraged resources to protect and restore important habitat, support critical land acquisitions, upgrade wastewater and stormwater infrastructure, conduct outreach and education, and implement other priority actions contained in their Comprehensive Conservation Management Plans. Note: Leveraged dollars are defined as the dollar value (cash or in-kind equivalent) of resources dedicated to implementing an NEP CCMP above and beyond the funding provided to the NEP under Section 320, including earmark funding. "Primary” leveraging indicates that the NEP Director and staff, rather than NEP partners, played the central or leadership role in obtaining the additional resources. Share 

## 3/15/2011 Sustainable Financing Strategies | Nat...

water.epa.gov/type/oceb/nep/fund.cfm 1/1
§ 145.203 Work performed at another location. A certificated repair station may temporarily transport material, equipment, and personnel needed to perform maintenance, preventive maintenance, alterations, or certain specialized services on an article for which it is rated to a place other than the repair station's fixed location if the following requirements are met: ( a ) The work is necessary due to a special circumstance, as determined by the FAA; or
( b ) It is necessary to perform such work on a recurring basis, and the repair station's manual includes the procedures for accomplishing maintenance, preventive maintenance, alterations, or specialized services at a place other than the repair station's fixed location.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO**

**RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

 

I, Daniel P. O’Brien, Chief Financial Officer of Global Crossing Limited, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Global Crossing Limited; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 25, 2004 

 

 

 

/s/    Daniel P. O’Brien

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3691 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3691

 To prohibit the Office of Federal Detention Trustee from constructing 
  Federal detention centers and to prohibit the Department of Justice 
 from siting a detention center or Federal prison in Maryland, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2003

Mr. Ruppersberger introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Office of Federal Detention Trustee from constructing 
  Federal detention centers and to prohibit the Department of Justice 
 from siting a detention center or Federal prison in Maryland, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON THE SITING OF CERTAIN DETENTION CENTERS AND 
              PRISONS.

    (a) Federal Detention Centers.--The Office of Federal Detention 
Trustee in the Department of Justice may not expend any funds for the 
construction of, or the solicitation of construction proposals for, any 
Federal detention center.
    (b) Centers and Prisons in Maryland.--The Attorney General of the 
United States is prohibited from constructing or acquiring any property 
or facilities in the State of Maryland to be used as a detention center 
or Federal prison.
                                 <all>
```