alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT B

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 3 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 4 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 5 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 6 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 7 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 8 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 9 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 10 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 11 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 12 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 13 of 14
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24741-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 16:42:14 Desc:

Exhibit Page 14 of 14
121 STAT. 724 PUBLIC LAW 110–75—AUG. 13, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2863: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–274 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

July 30, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 2, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–75 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To authorize the Coquille Indian Tribe of the State of Oregon to convey land 

and interests in land owned by the Tribe. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LAND AND INTERESTS OF COQUILLE INDIAN TRIBE, 

OREGON. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsections (b), (c), and (d) notwithstanding any other provision of law (including regulations), the 

Coquille Indian Tribe of the State of Oregon (including any agent 

or instrumentality of the Tribe) (referred to in this section as 

the ‘‘Tribe’’), may transfer, lease, encumber, or otherwise convey, 

without further authorization or approval, all or any part of the 

Tribe’s interest in any real property that is not held in trust 

by the United States for the benefit of the Tribe. 

(b) NONAPPLICABILITY TO CERTAIN CONVEYANCES.—Subsection 

(a) shall not apply with respect to any transfer, encumbrance, 

lease, or other conveyance of any land or interest in land of the 

Tribe that occurred before January 1, 2007. 

(c) EFFECT OF SECTION.—Nothing in this section is intended 

to authorize the Tribe to transfer, lease, encumber, or otherwise 

convey, any lands, or any interest in any lands, that are held 

in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Tribe. 

(d) LIABILITY.—The United States shall not be held liable to 

any party (including the Tribe or any agent or instrumentality 

of the Tribe) for any term of, or any loss resulting from the term 

of any transfer, lease, encumbrance, or conveyance of land made 

pursuant to this Act unless the United States or an agent or 

instrumentality of the United States is a party to the transaction 

or the United States would be liable pursuant to any other provision 

of law. This subsection shall not apply to land transferred or conveyed by the Tribe to the United States to be held in trust for 

the benefit of the Tribe. 

Approved August 13, 2007. 

25 USC 715h. 

Aug. 13, 2007 

[H.R. 2863] 

jbridges on GSDDPC57 with $$_JOB
#### Smead, Collard & Hughes *v.*Chrisfield & Peale.

1. The filing of a demurrer and an answer, .to the same stated cause of action, is not permissible. In such case, a motion to compel an election will be granted.

2. A motion to strike out specified defenses from an answer, for alleged uncertainty, will not be entertained.

Special Term. — Action in attachment, to recover from Chrisfield & Peale, as payees and indorsers of four promissory notes. Samuel Peale, one of the defendants, has filed a general demurrer to the petition, and, at the same time, has filed his answer, alleging three defenses to the action.

Plaintiff now moves to strike out the answer and demurrer, on the ground that the defendants can not demur and plead to the same matter, at the same time.

*Tilden, Rairden*& *Curwen,*for plaintiffs.

*Collins & Herron,*for defendants.

Storer, J.

The defendants demur to the whole petition; they have also filed their answer.

The plaintiffs move to strike out the demurrer, and the first and third clauses of the’ answer for irrelevancy.

The question made on, these pleadings is, can the defendants demur and ■ answer, at the same time, to the whole petition *1*

By section 84 of the - code, the only pleadings permitted are an answer or demurrer; section 87 prescribes the causes of demurrer, and requires that they should be definitely *18stated; by- section 91, the defendant may demur to one or more of the several causes of an action stated in the petition, and answer to the residue; by section 136, when a demurrer is overruled the party may have leave to answer or reply.

These sections, as well as the whole object of the code, clearly indicate what the dfefendant is permitted to do.

He can not demur to the whole petition, and answer it at the same time; this was the old rule in pleading; no defendant could demur and plead to the same count in the declaration, and this was also the proceeding in chancery. We are not inclined to strike out any pleading, except in such eases, where the matters set forth are frivolous, and clearly improper to be stated; but we have power to compel the defendants to elect between their demurrer and their answer. If the first is insisted on, the last must be withdrawn; and *on the other*hand, if the answer is relied on, the demurrer should be retracted. If the answer is retained, we will not entertain the motion to strike out the first and third clauses, but will give the plaintiff leave to file his application in the proper form, to compel the defendant to make the clauses in his answer more definite and certain.

This will satisfy the justice of the case, and protect the rights of the parties.

The defendant must make his election as indicated. The motion to strike out the demurrer, and the several clauses in the answer, is overruled.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Global Crossing Limited (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel P.
OBrien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                          |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/    Daniel P. OBrien                                 
|Daniel P. OBrien Chief Financial
Officer October 8, 2004
AHIMSA FOUNDATION EXHIBIT A1

PARTY APPEARANCE SHEET

Name of Party Ahimsa Foundation

Party Name Abbreviation 

(For Use with Zoom2)

Ahimsa

Attorney(s) Representing Party (provide the listed information 

for each attorney who may appear for the Party):

• Name,

• Email,

• Law Firm,

• Phone Number

• Docket Entry No. for the Attorney’s Notice of Appearance

• Zoom Screen Name (See Disclosure Statement Hearing

Procedures Order, ¶ 7(a))

or

Party-in-interest Not Represented by Counsel:

• Name, Email, Phone Number, Proof of Claim Number (if any)

Nathan Coco

nfcoco@mintz.com

Mintz Levin

212-692-6795

[Doc. No. 3227]

William Kannel

wkannel@mintz.com

Mintz Levin

617-542-2241

[Doc. No. 3227]

Elaine M. MaldonadoMatías

emaldonado@smclawpr.com

Sepulvado, Maldonado & 

Couret

(787) 765-5656

[Doc. No. 3235]

Elaine Maldonado

Walter P. Lebrón-Ramírez

wlebron@smclawpr.com

(787) 765-5656

[Doc. No. 3227]

If a Party files a supplemental Party Appearance Sheet, the Party 

must include the Docket Entry No. of the original appearance sheet 

in the new filing which must be clearly marked as a “Supplemental” 

Party Appearance Sheet.

N/A

Note: Pursuant to the Disclosure Statement Hearing Procedures 

Order ¶ 1, the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto 

Rico and the Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory 

Authority shall each be limited to 4 attorneys appearing in the Zoom 

session at any given time, and each other party-in-interest shall be 

limited to 2 attorneys at any given time.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23582-1 Filed:02/21/23 Entered:02/21/23 13:46:04 Desc:

Exhibit Ahimsa Exhibita A Page 1 of 3
1 This Party Appearance Sheet must be attached to a party-in-interest’s Informative Motion 

as Exhibit A.

2 See Disclosure Statement Hearing Procedures Order ¶ 7(a).

220213 EXHIBIT A. APPEARANCE SHEET VERSION FEBRUARY 13, 2023 1 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23582-1 Filed:02/21/23 Entered:02/21/23 13:46:04 Desc:

Exhibit Ahimsa Exhibita A Page 2 of 3
 N/A

 N/A

 N/A

EXHIBIT B1

PARTY EXHIBIT COVER SHEET

Name of Party

Does the Party intend to offer evidence?

Docket Entry No. for Party Exhibit List

Is there a pending request to seal 

this Exhibit?

Exhibit Identifier2 Docket Entry No. of Exhibit

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Local Rule 9037-1(a), parties and counsel are solely responsible for 

redacting the personal identifiers enumerated in Fed. R. Bank. P. 9037(a). 

1 This Party Exhibit Cover Sheet must be attached to a party-in-interest’s Informative 

Motion as Exhibit B.

2 Each Exhibit should be named in sequential party-identified numbering (e.g., “FOMB 

Ex. 1” or “UCC Ex. A”).

230213 EXHIBIT B. EXHIBIT COVER SHEET VERSION FEBRUARY 13, 2023 1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23582-1 Filed:02/21/23 Entered:02/21/23 13:46:04 Desc:

Exhibit Ahimsa Exhibita A Page 3 of 3
#### SCOTT v. BAILEY et al.

No. 31986.

March 6, 1945.

*156 P. 2d 625.*

*200F. E. Riddle, of Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

G. G. Hilford and John W. McCune, both of Tulsa, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

On April 8, 1944, the trial court entered an order approving and confirming sheriff’s sale. Plaintiff in error then filed a motion for new trial on April 10, 1944, and this motion was overruled on April 15, 1944. It is apparent that the plaintiff in error attempted to appeal from the order of April 15, 1944, and thereafter filed in this court the petition in error with case-made attached on October 11, 1944.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the appeal is not taken within six months from April 8, 1944, and therefore the court is without jurisdiction of the appeal.

The appeal must be dismissed. Grimes v. Ward, 179 Okla. 5, 64 P. 2d 894; Powell v. Nichols, 26 Okla. 734, 110 P. 762.

The appeal is dismissed.

HURST, V.C.J., and OSBORN, BAY-LESS, CORN, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.
§ 151.89 Roads. ( a ) Federal-aid Airport Program funds may not be used to resolve highway problems. Only those airport entrance roads that are definitely needed and are intended only as a way in and out of the airport are eligible.
( b ) The construction, alteration, and repair of airport roads and streets that are entirely within the airport boundaries are eligible under the program, if needed for operating and maintaining the airport. In the case of an entrance road, a strip right-of-way joining the main body of the airport to the nearest public road may be considered a part of the normal boundary of the airport if— ( 1 ) Adequate title is obtained;
( 2 ) It was acquired to provide an airport entrance road and was not, before the existence of the airport, a public thoroughfare;
( 3 ) The entrance road is intended only as a way in and out of the airport; and
( 4 ) The entrance road extends only to the nearest public highway, road, or street.
( c ) An entrance road may be joined to an existing highway or street with a normal fillet connection. However, acceleration-deceleration strips or grade separations are not eligible.
( d ) Offsite road or street relocation needed to allow airport development or to remove an obstruction, and is not for entrance road purposes, is eligible.
( e ) Appendix G sets forth typical eligible and ineligible items of road construction covered by this section.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ending December 31, 2003 of Joule Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Emanuel
N. Logothetis, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ EMANUEL N. LOGOTHETIS
----------------------------------
Emanuel N. Logothetis,
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

February 12, 2004
#### STATE v. JOHN THORVILDSON.1

December 8, 1916.

Nos. 20,176—(5).

Intoxicating liquor — evidence sustains conviction.

The evidence sustains the verdict finding defendant guilty of selling intoxicating liquors contrary to law.

Defendant was indicted by the grand jury for the crime of selling intoxicating liquor without a license, tried in the district court for Polk county before Watts, J., and a jury which found defendant guilty as charged in the indictment. Prom the order denying his motion for an order directing the dismissal of the action or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*E. A. Bronson*and *W. J.*Rasmussen, for appellant.

*Lyndon A.*Smith, Attorney General, James E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, and *G. A. Youngquist,*County Attorney, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 160 N. W. 247.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an order denying a new trial after a verdict finding appellant guilty of selling intoxicating liquors contrary to law. The assignments of error challenge only the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. There were only two witnesses produced concerning the sale. The prosecuting witness, a private detective employed by the county attorney, and defendant. Assuming both to be interested witnesses, it was nevertheless for the jury to determine who was telling the *99truth. That a witness is a detective and has been employed by the state to ascertain whether the liquor laws have been violated, does not justify the court in holding as a matter of law that his testimony is not worthy of credence. Some other points made in the brief, but not based on any assignment of error, need not be mentioned, for they are without merit.

Order affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 12, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00704

- CR

Juan Erik FLORES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B14289

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due

May 6, 2016. No further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of April, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 1215.112 User/NASA contractual arrangement.

No service shall be provided without an approved agreement.

[77 FR 6953, Feb. 10, 2012]
# Official Journal L 338/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 338 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5913 December 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 338

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5913 December 2016

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2016/2134 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2016/2135 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards certain provisions relating to financial management for certain Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability | 34 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2016/2134 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

1

*

Regulation (EU) 2016/2135 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards certain provisions relating to financial management for certain Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability

34

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,108,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  428,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,536,149
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,536,149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,640,110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,896,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,536,149
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>






<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                              0000797917
<NAME>                             RAYTECH CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                         U.S. DOLLARS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    1

<CASH>                             10,942
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      32,953
<ALLOWANCES>                       1,486
<INVENTORY>                        34,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   84,019
<PP&E>                             183,815
<DEPRECIATION>                     103,664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     326,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              60,680
<BONDS>                            0
<COMMON>                           5,651
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                         (6,981,561)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       326,644
<SALES>                            185,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   185,352
<CGS>                              138,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      138,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 1,799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (7,186,282)
<INCOME-TAX>                       (131,453)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (7,056,036)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (7,056,036)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (2,017.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (2,017.78)





</TABLE>