# Official Journal C 288/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.288.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 288 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5323 October 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.288.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 288

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5323 October 2010

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2010/C 288/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union OJ C 274, 9.10.2010 | 1 |
| | General Court |
| 2010/C 288/02 | Election of the President of the General Court | 2 |
| 2010/C 288/03 | Elections of Presidents of Chambers | 2 |
| 2010/C 288/04 | Assignment of Judges to Chambers | 2 |
| 2010/C 288/05 | Plenary session | 4 |
| 2010/C 288/06 | Composition of the Grand Chamber | 4 |
| 2010/C 288/07 | Appeal Chamber | 4 |
| 2010/C 288/08 | Criteria for assigning cases to Chambers | 5 |
| 2010/C 288/09 | Designation of the Judge replacing the President as the Judge hearing applications for interim measures | 5 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2010/C 288/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union OJ C 274, 9.10.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

1

General Court

2010/C 288/02

Election of the President of the General Court

2

2010/C 288/03

Elections of Presidents of Chambers

2

2010/C 288/04

Assignment of Judges to Chambers

2

2010/C 288/05

Plenary session

4

2010/C 288/06

Composition of the Grand Chamber

4

2010/C 288/07

Appeal Chamber

4

2010/C 288/08

Criteria for assigning cases to Chambers

5

2010/C 288/09

Designation of the Judge replacing the President as the Judge hearing applications for interim measures

5

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2010/C 288/10 | Case C-409/06: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln (Germany)) — Winner Wetten GmbH v Mayor of Bergheim (Articles 43 EC and 49 EC — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Organisation of bets on sporting competitions subject to a public monopoly at Land level — Decision of the Bundesverfassungsgericht finding the legislation for such a monopoly incompatible with the German Basic Law, but maintaining the legislation in force during a transitional period designed to allow it to be brought into conformity with the Basic Law — Principle of the primacy of Union law — Admissibility of, and possible conditions for, a transitional period of that type where the national legislation concerned also infringes Articles 43 EC and 49 EC) | 6 |
| 2010/C 288/11 | Case C-290/07 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2010 — European Commission v Scott SA, Département du Loiret, French Republic (Appeal — State aid — Preferential price for the purchase of developed land — Inquiry as to market value — Formal investigation procedure — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Obligation to undertake a diligent and impartial examination — Scope of the Commission’s power freely to assess value — Costs method — Scope of review by the Courts) | 6 |
| 2010/C 288/12 | Joined Cases C-316/07, C-358/07 to C-360/07, C-409/07 and C-410/07: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gießen Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart (Germany)) — Markus Stoß (C-316/07), Avalon Service-Online-Dienste GmbH (C-409/07), Olaf Amadeus Wilhelm Happel (C-410/07) Kulpa Automatenservice Asperg GmbH (C-358/07), SOBO Sport & Entertainment GmbH (C-359/07), Andreas Kunert (C-360/07) v Wetteraukreis (C-316/07, C-409/07, C-410/07), Land Baden Württemberg (C-358/07, C-359/07, C-360/07) (Articles 43 EC and 49 EC — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Organisation of bets on sporting competitions subject to a public monopoly at Land level — Objective of preventing incitement to squander money on gambling and combating gambling addiction — Proportionality — Restrictive measure to be genuinely aimed at reducing opportunities for gambling and limiting gambling activities in a consistent and systematic manner — Advertising emanating from the holder of the monopoly and encouraging participation in lotteries — Other games of chance capable of being offered by private operators — Expansion of the supply of other games of chance — Licence issued in another Member State — No mutual recognition obligation) | 7 |
| 2010/C 288/13 | Case C-46/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht (Germany)) — Carmen Media Group Ltd v Land Schleswig-Holstein, Innenminister des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (Article 49 EC — Freedom to provide services — Holder of a licence issued in Gibraltar authorising the collection of bets on sporting competitions only abroad — Organisation of bets on sporting competitions subject to a public monopoly at Land level — Objective of preventing incitement to squander money on gambling and combating gambling addiction — Proportionality — Restrictive measure to be genuinely aimed at reducing opportunities for gambling and limiting gambling activities in a consistent and systematic manner — Other games of chance capable of being offered by private operators — Authorisation procedure — Discretion of the competent authority — Prohibition on offering games of chance via the internet — Transitional measures provisionally authorising such an offer by certain operators) | 8 |
| 2010/C 288/14 | Case C-64/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Linz (Austria)) — Criminal proceedings against Ernst Engelmann (Freedom to provide services — Freedom of establishment — National rules establishing a system of concessions for the operation of games of chance in casinos — Concessions obtainable solely by public limited companies established in national territory — All concessions granted without any competitive procedure) | 9 |
| 2010/C 288/15 | Case C-399/08 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2010 — European Commission v Deutsche Post AG, Bundesverband Internationaler Express- und Kurierdienste eV, UPS Europe SA, Federal Republic of Germany (Appeal — Article 87 EC — Aid granted by the Member States — Measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany for Deutsche Post AG — Article 86 EC — Services of general economic interest — Compensation for additional costs generated by a policy of selling below cost in the door-to-door parcel delivery sector — Existence of an economic advantage — Method used by the Commission to check — Burden of proof — Article 230 EC — Scope of the General Court’s powers of judicial review) | 10 |
| 2010/C 288/16 | Case C-453/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikrateas (Greece)) — Panagiotis I. Karanikolas, Valsamis Daravanis, Georgios Kouvoukliotis, Panagiotis Ntolou, Dimitrios Z. Parisis, Konstantinos Emmanouil, Ioannis Anasoglou, Pantelis A. Beis, Dimitrios Chatziandreou, Ioannis A. Zaragkoulias, Triantafillos K. Mavrogiannis, Sotirios Th. Liotakis, Vasileos Karampasis, Dimitrios Melissidis, Ioannis V. Kleovoulos, Dimitrios I. Patsakos, Theodoros Fournarakis, Dimitrios K. Dimitrakopoulos and Sinetairismos Paraktion Alieon Kavalas v Ipourgos Agrotikis Anaptixis kai Trofimon and Nomarkhiaki Aftodioikisi Dramas-Kavalas, Xanthis (Common fisheries policy — Fisheries in the Mediterranean — Regulation (EC) No 1626/94 — Article 1(2) and (3) — Prohibition of the use of certain types of fishing net — Measures supplementary to or going beyond the minimum requirements of that regulation which were adopted before its entry into force — Conditions of validity) | 11 |
| 2010/C 288/17 | Case C-66/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Republic of Lithuania)) — Kirin Amgen Inc. v Lietuvos Respublikos valstybinis patentų biuras (Patent law — Proprietary medicinal products — Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 — Articles 7, 19 and 19a(e) — Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products — Period for lodging the application for such a certificate) | 11 |
| 2010/C 288/18 | Case C-254/09 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2010 — Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Zafra Marroquineros SL (Appeals — Community trade mark — Word mark CK CREACIONES KENNYA — Opposition by the proprietor of inter alia the Community figurative mark CK Calvin Klein and national marks CK — Opposition rejected) | 12 |
| 2010/C 288/19 | Case C-265/09 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2010 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v BORCO-Marken-Import Matthiesen GmbH & Co. KG (Appeal — Community trade mark — Application for registration of the figurative sign ‘α’ — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Mark consisting of a single letter) | 13 |
| 2010/C 288/20 | Case C-440/07 P: Order of the Court of 9 June 2010 — European Commission v Schneider Electric SA, Federal Republic of Germany, French Republic (Appeal — Partial annulment of the judgment under appeal — Where the state of the proceedings so permits — Non contractual liability of the Community — Evaluation of the loss) | 13 |
| 2010/C 288/21 | Joined Cases C-286/09 and C-287/09: Order of the Court of 9 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d'appello di Roma (Italy)) — Luigi Ricci (C-286/09), Aduo Pisaneschi (C-287/09) v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Officials — Retirement pension — Cumulation of periods of insurance — Article 11 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Taking account of periods of activity within the European Communities — Article 10 EC) | 14 |
| 2010/C 288/22 | Case C-298/09: Order of the Court of 16 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság Gazdasági Kollégiuma (Republic of Hungary)) — RANI Slovakia s.r.o. v Hankook Tire Magyarország Kft (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Accession to the European Union — Freedom to provide services — Directive 96/71/EC — Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services — Temporary employment undertaking — Requirement to have a head office in the territory of the Member State in which the services are supplied) | 14 |
| 2010/C 288/23 | Case C-312/09: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Anotato Dikastirio Kyprou (Republic of Cyprus)) — Giorgos Michalias v Christina A. Ioannou-Michalia (Article 104(3), second paragraph of the Rules of Procedure — Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 — Articles 2, 42 and 46 — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction in matrimonial matters — Accession of a State to the European Union — Divorce proceedings commenced before accession — Temporal scope of Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000)) | 15 |
| 2010/C 288/24 | Case C-350/09 P: Order of the Court of 12 May 2010 — Centre de promotion de l'emploi par la micro-entreprise (CPEM) v European Commission (Appeal — European Social Fund — Financial assistance — Cancellation) | 15 |
| 2010/C 288/25 | Case C-358/09 P: Order of the Court of 1 July 2010 — DSV Road NV v European Commission (Appeal — Customs Code — Import of diskettes originating in Thailand — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Application for remission of import duties) | 16 |
| 2010/C 288/26 | Case C-381/09: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy)) — Gennaro Curia v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate (Article 104(3), paragraph 1 of the Rules of Procedure — Sixth VAT Directive — Scope — VAT exemptions — Article 13B(d)(1) — Grant, negotiation and management of credit — Exorbitant lending activities — Activity unlawful under national law) | 16 |
| 2010/C 288/27 | Case C-448/09 P: Order of the Court of 30 June 2010 — Royal Appliance International GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Earlier mark ‘sensixx’ — Word mark ‘Centrixx’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Application for revocation of an earlier mark — Proceedings pending before the national courts — Request for a stay of the proceedings before the General Court) | 17 |
| 2010/C 288/28 | Case C-498/09 P: Order of the Court of 10 June 2010 — Thomson Sales Europe v European Commission (Appeal — Customs Code — Remission of import duties — Waiver of post-clearance recovery — Anti-dumping duties — No obvious negligence — Complexity of the legislation — Professional experience — Operator’s diligence — Colour televisions made in Thailand — Challengeable acts) | 17 |
| 2010/C 288/29 | Case C-352/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo (Spain) lodged on 13 July 2010 — Ángel Lorenzo González Alonso v Nationale Nederlanden Vida Compañía de Seguros y Reaseguros S.A.E. | 18 |
| 2010/C 288/30 | Case C-360/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 19 July 2010 — Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (Sabam) v Netlog NV | 18 |
| 2010/C 288/31 | Case C-363/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial de Póvoa de Lanhoso (Portugal) lodged on 21 July 2010 — Maria de Jesus Barbosa Rodrigues v Companhia de Seguros Zurich SA | 19 |
| 2010/C 288/32 | Case C-365/10: Action brought on 22 July 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia | 19 |
| 2010/C 288/33 | Case C-367/10 P: Appeal brought on 22 July 2010 by EMC Development AB against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 May 2010 in Case T-432/05: EMC Development AB v European Commission | 20 |
| 2010/C 288/34 | Case C-372/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny, Izba Finansowa, Wydział II (Republic of Poland), lodged on 26 July 2010 — Pak-Holdco Sp zoo v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu | 20 |
| 2010/C 288/35 | Case C-386/10 P: Appeal brought on 30 July 2010 by Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 19 May 2010 in Case T-21/05: Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon v European Commission | 21 |
| 2010/C 288/36 | Case C-392/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 4 August 2010 — Suiker Unie GmbH — Zuckerfabrik Anklam v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas | 21 |
| 2010/C 288/37 | Case C-402/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’Etat (France) lodged on 6 August 2010 — Société Groupe Limagrain Holding v FranceAgrimer | 22 |
| 2010/C 288/38 | Case C-405/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bruchsal (Germany) lodged on 10 August 2010 — Criminal proceedings against QB (*1) | 22 |
| 2010/C 288/39 | Case C-410/10: Action brought on 17 August 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic | 23 |
| 2010/C 288/40 | Case C-413/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Prato (Italy), lodged on 18 August 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Michela Pulignani, Alfonso Picariello, Bianca Cilla, Andrea Moretti, Mauro Bianconi, Patrizio Gori, Emilio Duranti and Concetta Zungri | 23 |
| 2010/C 288/41 | Case C-417/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 23 August 2010 — Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze; Agenzia delle Entrate v 3 M Italia SpA | 23 |
| 2010/C 288/42 | Case C-418/10 P: Appeal brought on 23 August 2010 by Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 7 July 2010 in Case T-60/09 Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Stabilator sp zoo | 24 |
| 2010/C 288/43 | Case C-420/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 23 August 2010 — Söll GmbH v Tetra GmbH | 25 |
| 2010/C 288/44 | Case C-427/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 31 August 2010 — Banca Antoniana Popolare Veneta s.p.a., incorporating Banca Nazionale Dell’Agricoltura s.p.a. v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate | 26 |
| 2010/C 288/45 | Case C-461/09 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2010 — The Wellcome Foundation Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Serono Genetics Institute SA (Appeals — Community trade mark — Word mark FAMOXIN — Application for a declaration of invalidity made by the proprietor of the national word mark LAMOXIN — Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity) | 26 |
| 2010/C 288/46 | Case C-200/08: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 1 July 2010 — European Commission v French Republic | 27 |
| 2010/C 288/47 | Case C-190/09: Order of the President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of 7 July 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Cyprus | 27 |
| 2010/C 288/48 | Case C-299/09: Order of the President of the Court of 25 May 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — DAR Duale Abfallwirtschaft und Verwertung Ruhrgebiet GmbH v Ministerstvo životního prostředí | 27 |
| 2010/C 288/49 | Case C-527/09: Order of the President of the Court of 22 June 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia | 27 |
| 2010/C 288/50 | Case C-88/10: Order of the President of the Court of 19 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Palermo — Italy) — Assessorato del Lavoro e della Previdenza Sociale v Seasoft SpA | 27 |
| 2010/C 288/51 | Case C-100/10: Order of the President of the Court of 12 July 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg | 27 |
| | General Court |
| 2010/C 288/52 | Case T-359/04: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — British Aggregates and Others v Commission (State aid — Environmental tax on aggregates in the United Kingdom — Exemption for Northern Ireland — Commission decision not to raise objections — Serious difficulties — Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection) | 28 |
| 2010/C 288/53 | Case T-29/05: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Deltafina v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Consistency between the statement of objections and the contested decision — Rights of the defence — Definition of the relevant market — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Aggravating circumstances — Role as leader — Cooperation) | 28 |
| 2010/C 288/54 | Case T-312/05: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Commission v Alexiadou (Arbitration clause — Contract concerning a project for the development of a technology for the production of waterproof leathers — Failure to perform the contract — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Default interest — Referral back to the General Court after annulment — Default proceedings) | 29 |
| 2010/C 288/55 | Case T-319/05: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Switzerland v Commission (External relations — Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — German measures relating to the approaches to Zurich airport — Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Rights of the defence — Principle of non-discrimination — Principle of proportionality) | 29 |
| 2010/C 288/56 | Case T-63/06: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EMCDDA) (Public service contracts — EMCDDA tender procedure — Supply of software programming and consultancy services — Rejection of a submitted tender — Award criteria — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Transparency — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons) | 30 |
| 2010/C 288/57 | Case T-119/06: Judgment of the General Court of (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2010 — Usha Martin Ltd v Council of the European Union and European Commission (Dumping — Imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in India — Breach of an undertaking — Principle of proportionality — Article 8(1), (7) and (9) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 8(1), (7) and (9) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009)) | 30 |
| 2010/C 288/58 | Case T-155/06: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Tomra Systems and Others v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Market for machines for the collection of used beverage containers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement — Exclusivity agreements, quantity commitments and loyalty rebates forming part of a strategy of excluding competitors from the market — Fine — Proportionality) | 31 |
| 2010/C 288/59 | Case T-264/07: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — CSL Behring v Commission and EMA (Medicinal products for human use — Procedure for designation of orphan medicinal products — Application for designation of human fibrinogen as an orphan medicinal product — Obligation to submit the application for designation before the application for marketing authorisation is made — Decision of EMA on the validity of the application) | 31 |
| 2010/C 288/60 | Case T-300/07: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Public service contracts — Community tendering procedure — Provision of information technology services relating to the management and maintenance of an internet portal — Rejection of the bid submitted by a tenderer — Award criteria — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Transparency) | 32 |
| 2010/C 288/61 | Case T-348/07: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Al-Aqsa v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP and Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Action for annulment — Adaptation of heads of claim — Judicial review — Conditions for implementation of a European Union measure freezing funds) | 32 |
| 2010/C 288/62 | Case T-70/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Axis v OHIM — Etra Investigación y Desarrollo (ETRAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ETRAX — Earlier national figurative marks containing the word elements ETRA I+D — Relative ground for refusal — Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal — Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 and Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 33 |
| 2010/C 288/63 | Case T-74/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Now Pharm v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Orphan Designation Procedure — Request for designation of the medicinal product ‘Chelidonii radix special liquid extract’ (‘Ukrain’) as an orphan medicinal product — Commission decision refusing designation as an orphan medicinal product) | 33 |
| 2010/C 288/64 | Case T-152/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Kido v OHIM — Amberes (SCORPIONEXO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SCORPIONEXO — Earlier national figurative mark ESCORPION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 34 |
| 2010/C 288/65 | Case T-233/08: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2010 — MPDV Mikrolab v OHIM (ROI ANALYZER) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark ROI ANALYZER — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 34 |
| 2010/C 288/66 | Case T-387/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Public service contracts — Publications Office’s tendering procedure — Provision of computing services — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Action for annulment — Award criteria and sub-criteria — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Equal treatment — Transparency — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Claim for damages) | 35 |
| 2010/C 288/67 | Case T-458/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Wilfer v OHIM (Representation of the head of a guitar) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark representing the head of a guitar in silver, grey and brown — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Examination of the facts of its own motion — Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — The first sentence of Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now the first sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Equal treatment) | 35 |
| 2010/C 288/68 | Case T-472/08: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2010 — Companhia Muller de Bebidas v OHIM — Missiato Industria e Comercio (61 A NOSSA ALEGRIA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark 61 A NOSSA ALEGRIA — Earlier national word mark CACHAÇA 51 and earlier national figurative marks Cachaça 51 and Pirassununga 51 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 36 |
| 2010/C 288/69 | Case T-505/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein v OHIM (Hunter) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Hunter — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application) | 36 |
| 2010/C 288/70 | Case T-575/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — 4care v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (Acumed) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Acumed — Earlier national word mark AQUAMED ACTIVE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 37 |
| 2010/C 288/71 | Case T-582/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Carpent Languages v Commission (Public service contracts — Community tendering procedure — Organisation of meetings and conferences — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment) | 37 |
| 2010/C 288/72 | Case T-64/09: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Micro Shaping v OHIM (packaging) (Community trade mark — Application for Community figurative mark packaging — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 38 |
| 2010/C 288/73 | Case T-91/09: Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2010 — Skareby v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Reports — Career Development Report — 2005 Assessment procedure — Simplified report established for the period from January to September 2005 — Repetition of all the findings in the 2004 Career Development Report partially annulled subsequent to the judgment under appeal) | 38 |
| 2010/C 288/74 | Case T-106/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM — Maclean (Archer Maclean’s Mercury) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Archer Maclean’s Mercury — Earlier national word mark Merkur — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 39 |
| 2010/C 288/75 | Case T-112/09: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Icebreaker v OHIM — Gilmar (ICEBREAKER) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ICEBREAKER — Earlier national word mark ICEBERG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Partial refusal to register — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 39 |
| 2010/C 288/76 | Case T-369/09: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Quinta do Portal v OHIM — Vallegre (PORTO ALEGRE) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark PORTO ALEGRE — Earlier national word mark VISTA ALEGRE — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 40 |
| 2010/C 288/77 | Case T-475/08 P: Order of the General Court of 29 July 2010 — Duta v Court of Justice (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — Recruitment — Post as Legal Secretary — Appeal manifestly inadmissible) | 40 |
| 2010/C 288/78 | Case T-58/09: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Schemaventotto v Commission (Action for annulment — Concentrations — Abandonment of an intended concentration — Decision to close the procedure opened under Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Act not amenable to review — Inadmissibility) | 41 |
| 2010/C 288/79 | Case T-15/10 R II R: Order of the President of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Noko Ngele v Commission (Interim Relief — Application for Interim Measures — New Application — Inadmissibility) | 41 |
| 2010/C 288/80 | Case T-305/10: Action brought on 23 July 2010 — Hartmann-Lamboy v OHIM — Diptyque (DYNIQUE) | 41 |
| 2010/C 288/81 | Case T-323/10: Action brought on 3 August 2010 — Chabou v OHIM — Chalou Kleiderfabrik (CHABOU) | 42 |
| 2010/C 288/82 | Case T-325/10: Action brought on 3 August 2010 — Iliad and Others v Commission | 43 |
| 2010/C 288/83 | Case T-326/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Fraas v OHIM (Light grey, dark grey, beige, dark red and brown coloured checked pattern) | 43 |
| 2010/C 288/84 | Case T-327/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Fraas v OHIM (Black, dark grey, light grey and dark red coloured checked pattern) | 44 |
| 2010/C 288/85 | Case T-328/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Fraas v OHIM (Dark grey, light grey, beige and dark red coloured checked pattern) | 44 |
| 2010/C 288/86 | Case T-329/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Fraas v OHIM (Black, grey, beige and dark red coloured checked pattern) | 45 |
| 2010/C 288/87 | Case T-334/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Leifheit v OHIM — Vermop Salmon (Twist System) | 45 |
| 2010/C 288/88 | Case T-337/10: Action brought on 17 August 2010 — Seatech International and Others v Council and Commission | 46 |
| 2010/C 288/89 | Case T-338/10: Action brought on 18 August 2010 — Commission v Tornasol Films | 47 |
| 2010/C 288/90 | Case T-339/10: Action brought on 9 August 2010 — Cosepuri v EFSA | 47 |
| 2010/C 288/91 | Case T-340/10: Action brought on 20 August 2010 — CTG Luxembourg PSF v Court of Justice | 48 |
| 2010/C 288/92 | Case T-342/10: Action brought on 23 August 2010 — Hartmann v OHMI — Mölnlycke Health Care (MESILETTE) | 49 |
| 2010/C 288/93 | Case T-343/10: Action brought on 18 August 2010 — Etimine and Etiproducts v ECHA | 49 |
| 2010/C 288/94 | Case T-344/10: Action brought on 20 August 2010 — UPS Europe and United Parcel Service Deutschland v Commission | 50 |
| 2010/C 288/95 | Case T-346/10: Action brought on 18 August 2010 — Borax Europe v ECHA | 51 |
| 2010/C 288/96 | Case T-347/10: Action brought on 27 August 2010 — Adelholzener Alpenquellen v OHIM (Shape of a bottle with a relief-like depiction of three mountain summits) | 52 |
| 2010/C 288/97 | Case T-348/10: Action brought on 16 August 2010 — Panzeri v OHIM — Royal Trophy (Royal veste e premia lo sport) | 52 |
| 2010/C 288/98 | Case T-349/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (OVUMCONTROL) | 53 |
| 2010/C 288/99 | Case T-350/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (HEARTCONTROL) | 53 |
| 2010/C 288/100 | Case T-351/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (VESICACONTROL) | 54 |
| 2010/C 288/101 | Case T-352/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (RECTALCONTROL) | 54 |
| 2010/C 288/102 | Case T-353/10: Action brought on 31 August 2010 — Lito Maieftiko Ginaikologiko kai Khirourgiko Kentro v Commission | 55 |
| 2010/C 288/103 | Case T-356/10: Action brought on 23 August 2010 — Nike International/OHMI — Deichmann (VICTORY RED) | 55 |
| 2010/C 288/104 | Case T-357/10: Action brought on 27 August 2010 — Kraft Foods Schweiz v OHIM — Compañía Nacional de Chocolates (CORONA) | 56 |
| 2010/C 288/105 | Case T-359/10: Action brought on 25 August 2010 — Ecologistas en Acción — CODA v Commission | 57 |
| 2010/C 288/106 | Case T-362/10: Action brought on 27 August 2010 — Vtesse Networks v Commission | 57 |
| 2010/C 288/107 | Case T-363/10: Action brought on 27 August 2010 — Abbott Laboratories v OHIM (RESTORE) | 58 |
| 2010/C 288/108 | Case T-364/10: Action brought on 2 September 2010 — Duravit and Others v Commission | 59 |
| 2010/C 288/109 | Case T-366/10 P: Appeal brought on 1 September 2010 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal made on 22 June 2010 in Case F-78/09, Marcuccio v Commission | 60 |
| 2010/C 288/110 | Case T-368/10: Action brought on 3 September 2010 — Rubinetteria Cisal v Commission | 61 |
| 2010/C 288/111 | Case T-370/10: Action brought on 30 August 2010 — Rubinetterie Teorema v Commission | 62 |
| 2010/C 288/112 | Case T-371/10: Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Amor v OHIM — Jablonex Group (AMORIKE) | 62 |
| 2010/C 288/113 | Case T-376/10: Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Mamoli Robinetteria v Commission | 63 |
| 2010/C 288/114 | Case T-380/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Wabco Europe and Others v Commission | 64 |
| 2010/C 288/115 | Case T-384/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Spain v Commission | 64 |
| 2010/C 288/116 | Case T-170/03: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2010 — British American Tobacco (Investments) v Commission | 65 |
| 2010/C 288/117 | Case T-34/06: Order of the General Court of 1 September 2010 — Universal v Commission | 65 |
| 2010/C 288/118 | Case T-88/07: Order of the General Court of 1 September 2010 — Fabryka Samochodòw Osobowych v Commission | 66 |
| 2010/C 288/119 | Joined Cases T-440/07 and T-1/08: Order of the General Court of 3 September 2010 — Huta Buczek v Commission | 66 |
| 2010/C 288/120 | Case T-125/09: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Gruener Janura v OHIM — Centum Aqua Marketing (Hundertwasser) | 66 |
| 2010/C 288/121 | Case T-505/09: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2010 — Carlyle v OHIM — MRP Consult (CAFE CARLYLE) | 66 |
| 2010/C 288/122 | Case T-506/09: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2010 — Carlyle v OHIM — MRP Consult (THE CARLYLE) | 66 |
| 2010/C 288/123 | Case T-49/10: Order of the General Court of 11 August 2010 — Footwear v OHIM — Reno Schuhcentrum (swiss cross FOOTWEAR) | 66 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2010/C 288/124 | Case F-27/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Hanschmann v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence) | 67 |
| 2010/C 288/125 | Case F-28/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Kipp v European Police Office (Europol), (Civil service — Europol staff — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the staff regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of the rights of defence) | 67 |
| 2010/C 288/126 | Case F-34/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Sluiter v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence) | 68 |
| 2010/C 288/127 | Case F-35/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Visser-Fornt Raya v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence) | 68 |
| 2010/C 288/128 | Case F-36/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Armitage-Wilson v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence) | 69 |
| 2010/C 288/129 | Case F-37/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Doyle v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence) | 69 |
| 2010/C 288/130 | Case F-38/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Martin v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence) | 70 |
| 2010/C 288/131 | Case F-39/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Goddijn v European Police Office (Europol) (Public service — Europol staff — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract for an indefinite period — Article 6 of Europol Staff Regulations — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence) | 70 |
| 2010/C 288/132 | Case F-41/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Roumimper v European Police Office (Europol) (Public service — Europol staff — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract for an indefinite period — Article 6 Europol Staff Regulation — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence) | 71 |
| 2010/C 288/133 | Case F-42/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Esneau-Kappé v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence) | 71 |
| 2010/C 288/134 | Case F-44/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Knöll v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence) | 72 |
| 2010/C 288/135 | Case F-91/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 9 July 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Public service — Officials — Reasonable time-limits for bringing a claim for damages — Out of time) | 72 |
| 2010/C 288/136 | Case F-103/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 July 2010 — Allen and Others v Commission (Civil service — Staff employed at the JET project — Actions for damages — Reasonable period — Out of time) | 72 |
| 2010/C 288/137 | Case F-11/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Palou Martínez v Commission (Public service — Officials — Manifestly inadmissible — Delay — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Article 35(1)(e) of the Rules of Procedure) | 73 |
| 2010/C 288/138 | Case F-65/10: Action brought on 6 August 2010 — Mata Blanco v Commission | 73 |
| 2010/C 288/139 | Case F-66/10: Action brought on 17 August 2010 — De Britto Patricio-Dias v Commission | 74 |
| 2010/C 288/140 | Case F-67/10: Action brought on 18 August 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission | 74 |
| 2010/C 288/141 | Case F-68/10: Action brought on 20 August 2010 — Behnke v Commission | 74 |
| 2010/C 288/142 | Case F-69/10: Action brought on 24 August 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission | 75 |
| 2010/C 288/143 | Case F-70/10: Action brought on 27 August 2010 — Hidalgo v European Parliament | 75 |
| 2010/C 288/144 | Case F-30/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 June 2010 — Hanot v Commission | 76 |
| 2010/C 288/145 | Case F-86/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 July 2010 — Vereecken v Commission | 76 |
| 2010/C 288/146 | Case F-26/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 9 July 2010 — Potoms and Scillia v Parliament | 76 |
| 2010/C 288/147 | Case F-29/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 July 2010 — Quadu v Parliament | 76 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2010/C 288/10

Case C-409/06: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln (Germany)) — Winner Wetten GmbH v Mayor of Bergheim (Articles 43 EC and 49 EC — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Organisation of bets on sporting competitions subject to a public monopoly at Land level — Decision of the Bundesverfassungsgericht finding the legislation for such a monopoly incompatible with the German Basic Law, but maintaining the legislation in force during a transitional period designed to allow it to be brought into conformity with the Basic Law — Principle of the primacy of Union law — Admissibility of, and possible conditions for, a transitional period of that type where the national legislation concerned also infringes Articles 43 EC and 49 EC)

6

2010/C 288/11

Case C-290/07 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2010 — European Commission v Scott SA, Département du Loiret, French Republic (Appeal — State aid — Preferential price for the purchase of developed land — Inquiry as to market value — Formal investigation procedure — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Obligation to undertake a diligent and impartial examination — Scope of the Commission’s power freely to assess value — Costs method — Scope of review by the Courts)

6

2010/C 288/12

Joined Cases C-316/07, C-358/07 to C-360/07, C-409/07 and C-410/07: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gießen Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart (Germany)) — Markus Stoß (C-316/07), Avalon Service-Online-Dienste GmbH (C-409/07), Olaf Amadeus Wilhelm Happel (C-410/07) Kulpa Automatenservice Asperg GmbH (C-358/07), SOBO Sport & Entertainment GmbH (C-359/07), Andreas Kunert (C-360/07) v Wetteraukreis (C-316/07, C-409/07, C-410/07), Land Baden Württemberg (C-358/07, C-359/07, C-360/07) (Articles 43 EC and 49 EC — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Organisation of bets on sporting competitions subject to a public monopoly at Land level — Objective of preventing incitement to squander money on gambling and combating gambling addiction — Proportionality — Restrictive measure to be genuinely aimed at reducing opportunities for gambling and limiting gambling activities in a consistent and systematic manner — Advertising emanating from the holder of the monopoly and encouraging participation in lotteries — Other games of chance capable of being offered by private operators — Expansion of the supply of other games of chance — Licence issued in another Member State — No mutual recognition obligation)

7

2010/C 288/13

Case C-46/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht (Germany)) — Carmen Media Group Ltd v Land Schleswig-Holstein, Innenminister des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (Article 49 EC — Freedom to provide services — Holder of a licence issued in Gibraltar authorising the collection of bets on sporting competitions only abroad — Organisation of bets on sporting competitions subject to a public monopoly at Land level — Objective of preventing incitement to squander money on gambling and combating gambling addiction — Proportionality — Restrictive measure to be genuinely aimed at reducing opportunities for gambling and limiting gambling activities in a consistent and systematic manner — Other games of chance capable of being offered by private operators — Authorisation procedure — Discretion of the competent authority — Prohibition on offering games of chance via the internet — Transitional measures provisionally authorising such an offer by certain operators)

8

2010/C 288/14

Case C-64/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Linz (Austria)) — Criminal proceedings against Ernst Engelmann (Freedom to provide services — Freedom of establishment — National rules establishing a system of concessions for the operation of games of chance in casinos — Concessions obtainable solely by public limited companies established in national territory — All concessions granted without any competitive procedure)

9

2010/C 288/15

Case C-399/08 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2010 — European Commission v Deutsche Post AG, Bundesverband Internationaler Express- und Kurierdienste eV, UPS Europe SA, Federal Republic of Germany (Appeal — Article 87 EC — Aid granted by the Member States — Measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany for Deutsche Post AG — Article 86 EC — Services of general economic interest — Compensation for additional costs generated by a policy of selling below cost in the door-to-door parcel delivery sector — Existence of an economic advantage — Method used by the Commission to check — Burden of proof — Article 230 EC — Scope of the General Court’s powers of judicial review)

10

2010/C 288/16

Case C-453/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikrateas (Greece)) — Panagiotis I. Karanikolas, Valsamis Daravanis, Georgios Kouvoukliotis, Panagiotis Ntolou, Dimitrios Z. Parisis, Konstantinos Emmanouil, Ioannis Anasoglou, Pantelis A. Beis, Dimitrios Chatziandreou, Ioannis A. Zaragkoulias, Triantafillos K. Mavrogiannis, Sotirios Th. Liotakis, Vasileos Karampasis, Dimitrios Melissidis, Ioannis V. Kleovoulos, Dimitrios I. Patsakos, Theodoros Fournarakis, Dimitrios K. Dimitrakopoulos and Sinetairismos Paraktion Alieon Kavalas v Ipourgos Agrotikis Anaptixis kai Trofimon and Nomarkhiaki Aftodioikisi Dramas-Kavalas, Xanthis (Common fisheries policy — Fisheries in the Mediterranean — Regulation (EC) No 1626/94 — Article 1(2) and (3) — Prohibition of the use of certain types of fishing net — Measures supplementary to or going beyond the minimum requirements of that regulation which were adopted before its entry into force — Conditions of validity)

11

2010/C 288/17

Case C-66/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Republic of Lithuania)) — Kirin Amgen Inc. v Lietuvos Respublikos valstybinis patentų biuras (Patent law — Proprietary medicinal products — Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 — Articles 7, 19 and 19a(e) — Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products — Period for lodging the application for such a certificate)

11

2010/C 288/18

Case C-254/09 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2010 — Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Zafra Marroquineros SL (Appeals — Community trade mark — Word mark CK CREACIONES KENNYA — Opposition by the proprietor of inter alia the Community figurative mark CK Calvin Klein and national marks CK — Opposition rejected)

12

2010/C 288/19

Case C-265/09 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2010 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v BORCO-Marken-Import Matthiesen GmbH & Co. KG (Appeal — Community trade mark — Application for registration of the figurative sign ‘α’ — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Mark consisting of a single letter)

13

2010/C 288/20

Case C-440/07 P: Order of the Court of 9 June 2010 — European Commission v Schneider Electric SA, Federal Republic of Germany, French Republic (Appeal — Partial annulment of the judgment under appeal — Where the state of the proceedings so permits — Non contractual liability of the Community — Evaluation of the loss)

13

2010/C 288/21

Joined Cases C-286/09 and C-287/09: Order of the Court of 9 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d'appello di Roma (Italy)) — Luigi Ricci (C-286/09), Aduo Pisaneschi (C-287/09) v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Officials — Retirement pension — Cumulation of periods of insurance — Article 11 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Taking account of periods of activity within the European Communities — Article 10 EC)

14

2010/C 288/22

Case C-298/09: Order of the Court of 16 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság Gazdasági Kollégiuma (Republic of Hungary)) — RANI Slovakia s.r.o. v Hankook Tire Magyarország Kft (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Accession to the European Union — Freedom to provide services — Directive 96/71/EC — Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services — Temporary employment undertaking — Requirement to have a head office in the territory of the Member State in which the services are supplied)

14

2010/C 288/23

Case C-312/09: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Anotato Dikastirio Kyprou (Republic of Cyprus)) — Giorgos Michalias v Christina A. Ioannou-Michalia (Article 104(3), second paragraph of the Rules of Procedure — Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 — Articles 2, 42 and 46 — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction in matrimonial matters — Accession of a State to the European Union — Divorce proceedings commenced before accession — Temporal scope of Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000))

15

2010/C 288/24

Case C-350/09 P: Order of the Court of 12 May 2010 — Centre de promotion de l'emploi par la micro-entreprise (CPEM) v European Commission (Appeal — European Social Fund — Financial assistance — Cancellation)

15

2010/C 288/25

Case C-358/09 P: Order of the Court of 1 July 2010 — DSV Road NV v European Commission (Appeal — Customs Code — Import of diskettes originating in Thailand — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Application for remission of import duties)

16

2010/C 288/26

Case C-381/09: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy)) — Gennaro Curia v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate (Article 104(3), paragraph 1 of the Rules of Procedure — Sixth VAT Directive — Scope — VAT exemptions — Article 13B(d)(1) — Grant, negotiation and management of credit — Exorbitant lending activities — Activity unlawful under national law)

16

2010/C 288/27

Case C-448/09 P: Order of the Court of 30 June 2010 — Royal Appliance International GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Earlier mark ‘sensixx’ — Word mark ‘Centrixx’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Application for revocation of an earlier mark — Proceedings pending before the national courts — Request for a stay of the proceedings before the General Court)

17

2010/C 288/28

Case C-498/09 P: Order of the Court of 10 June 2010 — Thomson Sales Europe v European Commission (Appeal — Customs Code — Remission of import duties — Waiver of post-clearance recovery — Anti-dumping duties — No obvious negligence — Complexity of the legislation — Professional experience — Operator’s diligence — Colour televisions made in Thailand — Challengeable acts)

17

2010/C 288/29

Case C-352/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo (Spain) lodged on 13 July 2010 — Ángel Lorenzo González Alonso v Nationale Nederlanden Vida Compañía de Seguros y Reaseguros S.A.E.

18

2010/C 288/30

Case C-360/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 19 July 2010 — Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (Sabam) v Netlog NV

18

2010/C 288/31

Case C-363/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial de Póvoa de Lanhoso (Portugal) lodged on 21 July 2010 — Maria de Jesus Barbosa Rodrigues v Companhia de Seguros Zurich SA

19

2010/C 288/32

Case C-365/10: Action brought on 22 July 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia

19

2010/C 288/33

Case C-367/10 P: Appeal brought on 22 July 2010 by EMC Development AB against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 May 2010 in Case T-432/05: EMC Development AB v European Commission

20

2010/C 288/34

Case C-372/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny, Izba Finansowa, Wydział II (Republic of Poland), lodged on 26 July 2010 — Pak-Holdco Sp zoo v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu

20

2010/C 288/35

Case C-386/10 P: Appeal brought on 30 July 2010 by Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 19 May 2010 in Case T-21/05: Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon v European Commission

21

2010/C 288/36

Case C-392/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 4 August 2010 — Suiker Unie GmbH — Zuckerfabrik Anklam v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

21

2010/C 288/37

Case C-402/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’Etat (France) lodged on 6 August 2010 — Société Groupe Limagrain Holding v FranceAgrimer

22

2010/C 288/38

Case C-405/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bruchsal (Germany) lodged on 10 August 2010 — Criminal proceedings against QB (*1)

*1

22

2010/C 288/39

Case C-410/10: Action brought on 17 August 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

23

2010/C 288/40

Case C-413/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Prato (Italy), lodged on 18 August 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Michela Pulignani, Alfonso Picariello, Bianca Cilla, Andrea Moretti, Mauro Bianconi, Patrizio Gori, Emilio Duranti and Concetta Zungri

23

2010/C 288/41

Case C-417/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 23 August 2010 — Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze; Agenzia delle Entrate v 3 M Italia SpA

23

2010/C 288/42

Case C-418/10 P: Appeal brought on 23 August 2010 by Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 7 July 2010 in Case T-60/09 Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Stabilator sp zoo

24

2010/C 288/43

Case C-420/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 23 August 2010 — Söll GmbH v Tetra GmbH

25

2010/C 288/44

Case C-427/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 31 August 2010 — Banca Antoniana Popolare Veneta s.p.a., incorporating Banca Nazionale Dell’Agricoltura s.p.a. v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate

26

2010/C 288/45

Case C-461/09 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2010 — The Wellcome Foundation Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Serono Genetics Institute SA (Appeals — Community trade mark — Word mark FAMOXIN — Application for a declaration of invalidity made by the proprietor of the national word mark LAMOXIN — Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity)

26

2010/C 288/46

Case C-200/08: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 1 July 2010 — European Commission v French Republic

27

2010/C 288/47

Case C-190/09: Order of the President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of 7 July 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Cyprus

27

2010/C 288/48

Case C-299/09: Order of the President of the Court of 25 May 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — DAR Duale Abfallwirtschaft und Verwertung Ruhrgebiet GmbH v Ministerstvo životního prostředí

27

2010/C 288/49

Case C-527/09: Order of the President of the Court of 22 June 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

27

2010/C 288/50

Case C-88/10: Order of the President of the Court of 19 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Palermo — Italy) — Assessorato del Lavoro e della Previdenza Sociale v Seasoft SpA

27

2010/C 288/51

Case C-100/10: Order of the President of the Court of 12 July 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

27

General Court

2010/C 288/52

Case T-359/04: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — British Aggregates and Others v Commission (State aid — Environmental tax on aggregates in the United Kingdom — Exemption for Northern Ireland — Commission decision not to raise objections — Serious difficulties — Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection)

28

2010/C 288/53

Case T-29/05: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Deltafina v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Consistency between the statement of objections and the contested decision — Rights of the defence — Definition of the relevant market — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Aggravating circumstances — Role as leader — Cooperation)

28

2010/C 288/54

Case T-312/05: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Commission v Alexiadou (Arbitration clause — Contract concerning a project for the development of a technology for the production of waterproof leathers — Failure to perform the contract — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Default interest — Referral back to the General Court after annulment — Default proceedings)

29

2010/C 288/55

Case T-319/05: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Switzerland v Commission (External relations — Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — German measures relating to the approaches to Zurich airport — Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Rights of the defence — Principle of non-discrimination — Principle of proportionality)

29

2010/C 288/56

Case T-63/06: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EMCDDA) (Public service contracts — EMCDDA tender procedure — Supply of software programming and consultancy services — Rejection of a submitted tender — Award criteria — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Transparency — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons)

30

2010/C 288/57

Case T-119/06: Judgment of the General Court of (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2010 — Usha Martin Ltd v Council of the European Union and European Commission (Dumping — Imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in India — Breach of an undertaking — Principle of proportionality — Article 8(1), (7) and (9) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 8(1), (7) and (9) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009))

30

2010/C 288/58

Case T-155/06: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Tomra Systems and Others v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Market for machines for the collection of used beverage containers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement — Exclusivity agreements, quantity commitments and loyalty rebates forming part of a strategy of excluding competitors from the market — Fine — Proportionality)

31

2010/C 288/59

Case T-264/07: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — CSL Behring v Commission and EMA (Medicinal products for human use — Procedure for designation of orphan medicinal products — Application for designation of human fibrinogen as an orphan medicinal product — Obligation to submit the application for designation before the application for marketing authorisation is made — Decision of EMA on the validity of the application)

31

2010/C 288/60

Case T-300/07: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Public service contracts — Community tendering procedure — Provision of information technology services relating to the management and maintenance of an internet portal — Rejection of the bid submitted by a tenderer — Award criteria — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Transparency)

32

2010/C 288/61

Case T-348/07: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Al-Aqsa v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP and Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Action for annulment — Adaptation of heads of claim — Judicial review — Conditions for implementation of a European Union measure freezing funds)

32

2010/C 288/62

Case T-70/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Axis v OHIM — Etra Investigación y Desarrollo (ETRAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ETRAX — Earlier national figurative marks containing the word elements ETRA I+D — Relative ground for refusal — Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal — Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 and Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

33

2010/C 288/63

Case T-74/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Now Pharm v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Orphan Designation Procedure — Request for designation of the medicinal product ‘Chelidonii radix special liquid extract’ (‘Ukrain’) as an orphan medicinal product — Commission decision refusing designation as an orphan medicinal product)

33

2010/C 288/64

Case T-152/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Kido v OHIM — Amberes (SCORPIONEXO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SCORPIONEXO — Earlier national figurative mark ESCORPION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

34

2010/C 288/65

Case T-233/08: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2010 — MPDV Mikrolab v OHIM (ROI ANALYZER) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark ROI ANALYZER — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

34

2010/C 288/66

Case T-387/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Public service contracts — Publications Office’s tendering procedure — Provision of computing services — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Action for annulment — Award criteria and sub-criteria — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Equal treatment — Transparency — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Claim for damages)

35

2010/C 288/67

Case T-458/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Wilfer v OHIM (Representation of the head of a guitar) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark representing the head of a guitar in silver, grey and brown — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Examination of the facts of its own motion — Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — The first sentence of Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now the first sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Equal treatment)

35

2010/C 288/68

Case T-472/08: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2010 — Companhia Muller de Bebidas v OHIM — Missiato Industria e Comercio (61 A NOSSA ALEGRIA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark 61 A NOSSA ALEGRIA — Earlier national word mark CACHAÇA 51 and earlier national figurative marks Cachaça 51 and Pirassununga 51 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

36

2010/C 288/69

Case T-505/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein v OHIM (Hunter) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Hunter — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application)

36

2010/C 288/70

Case T-575/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — 4care v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (Acumed) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Acumed — Earlier national word mark AQUAMED ACTIVE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

37

2010/C 288/71

Case T-582/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Carpent Languages v Commission (Public service contracts — Community tendering procedure — Organisation of meetings and conferences — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment)

37

2010/C 288/72

Case T-64/09: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Micro Shaping v OHIM (packaging) (Community trade mark — Application for Community figurative mark packaging — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

38

2010/C 288/73

Case T-91/09: Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2010 — Skareby v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Reports — Career Development Report — 2005 Assessment procedure — Simplified report established for the period from January to September 2005 — Repetition of all the findings in the 2004 Career Development Report partially annulled subsequent to the judgment under appeal)

38

2010/C 288/74

Case T-106/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM — Maclean (Archer Maclean’s Mercury) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Archer Maclean’s Mercury — Earlier national word mark Merkur — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

39

2010/C 288/75

Case T-112/09: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Icebreaker v OHIM — Gilmar (ICEBREAKER) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ICEBREAKER — Earlier national word mark ICEBERG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Partial refusal to register — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

39

2010/C 288/76

Case T-369/09: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Quinta do Portal v OHIM — Vallegre (PORTO ALEGRE) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark PORTO ALEGRE — Earlier national word mark VISTA ALEGRE — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

40

2010/C 288/77

Case T-475/08 P: Order of the General Court of 29 July 2010 — Duta v Court of Justice (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — Recruitment — Post as Legal Secretary — Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

40

2010/C 288/78

Case T-58/09: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Schemaventotto v Commission (Action for annulment — Concentrations — Abandonment of an intended concentration — Decision to close the procedure opened under Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Act not amenable to review — Inadmissibility)

41

2010/C 288/79

Case T-15/10 R II R: Order of the President of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Noko Ngele v Commission (Interim Relief — Application for Interim Measures — New Application — Inadmissibility)

41

2010/C 288/80

Case T-305/10: Action brought on 23 July 2010 — Hartmann-Lamboy v OHIM — Diptyque (DYNIQUE)

41

2010/C 288/81

Case T-323/10: Action brought on 3 August 2010 — Chabou v OHIM — Chalou Kleiderfabrik (CHABOU)

42

2010/C 288/82

Case T-325/10: Action brought on 3 August 2010 — Iliad and Others v Commission

43

2010/C 288/83

Case T-326/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Fraas v OHIM (Light grey, dark grey, beige, dark red and brown coloured checked pattern)

43

2010/C 288/84

Case T-327/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Fraas v OHIM (Black, dark grey, light grey and dark red coloured checked pattern)

44

2010/C 288/85

Case T-328/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Fraas v OHIM (Dark grey, light grey, beige and dark red coloured checked pattern)

44

2010/C 288/86

Case T-329/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Fraas v OHIM (Black, grey, beige and dark red coloured checked pattern)

45

2010/C 288/87

Case T-334/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Leifheit v OHIM — Vermop Salmon (Twist System)

45

2010/C 288/88

Case T-337/10: Action brought on 17 August 2010 — Seatech International and Others v Council and Commission

46

2010/C 288/89

Case T-338/10: Action brought on 18 August 2010 — Commission v Tornasol Films

47

2010/C 288/90

Case T-339/10: Action brought on 9 August 2010 — Cosepuri v EFSA

47

2010/C 288/91

Case T-340/10: Action brought on 20 August 2010 — CTG Luxembourg PSF v Court of Justice

48

2010/C 288/92

Case T-342/10: Action brought on 23 August 2010 — Hartmann v OHMI — Mölnlycke Health Care (MESILETTE)

49

2010/C 288/93

Case T-343/10: Action brought on 18 August 2010 — Etimine and Etiproducts v ECHA

49

2010/C 288/94

Case T-344/10: Action brought on 20 August 2010 — UPS Europe and United Parcel Service Deutschland v Commission

50

2010/C 288/95

Case T-346/10: Action brought on 18 August 2010 — Borax Europe v ECHA

51

2010/C 288/96

Case T-347/10: Action brought on 27 August 2010 — Adelholzener Alpenquellen v OHIM (Shape of a bottle with a relief-like depiction of three mountain summits)

52

2010/C 288/97

Case T-348/10: Action brought on 16 August 2010 — Panzeri v OHIM — Royal Trophy (Royal veste e premia lo sport)

52

2010/C 288/98

Case T-349/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (OVUMCONTROL)

53

2010/C 288/99

Case T-350/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (HEARTCONTROL)

53

2010/C 288/100

Case T-351/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (VESICACONTROL)

54

2010/C 288/101

Case T-352/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (RECTALCONTROL)

54

2010/C 288/102

Case T-353/10: Action brought on 31 August 2010 — Lito Maieftiko Ginaikologiko kai Khirourgiko Kentro v Commission

55

2010/C 288/103

Case T-356/10: Action brought on 23 August 2010 — Nike International/OHMI — Deichmann (VICTORY RED)

55

2010/C 288/104

Case T-357/10: Action brought on 27 August 2010 — Kraft Foods Schweiz v OHIM — Compañía Nacional de Chocolates (CORONA)

56

2010/C 288/105

Case T-359/10: Action brought on 25 August 2010 — Ecologistas en Acción — CODA v Commission

57

2010/C 288/106

Case T-362/10: Action brought on 27 August 2010 — Vtesse Networks v Commission

57

2010/C 288/107

Case T-363/10: Action brought on 27 August 2010 — Abbott Laboratories v OHIM (RESTORE)

58

2010/C 288/108

Case T-364/10: Action brought on 2 September 2010 — Duravit and Others v Commission

59

2010/C 288/109

Case T-366/10 P: Appeal brought on 1 September 2010 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal made on 22 June 2010 in Case F-78/09, Marcuccio v Commission

60

2010/C 288/110

Case T-368/10: Action brought on 3 September 2010 — Rubinetteria Cisal v Commission

61

2010/C 288/111

Case T-370/10: Action brought on 30 August 2010 — Rubinetterie Teorema v Commission

62

2010/C 288/112

Case T-371/10: Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Amor v OHIM — Jablonex Group (AMORIKE)

62

2010/C 288/113

Case T-376/10: Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Mamoli Robinetteria v Commission

63

2010/C 288/114

Case T-380/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Wabco Europe and Others v Commission

64

2010/C 288/115

Case T-384/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Spain v Commission

64

2010/C 288/116

Case T-170/03: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2010 — British American Tobacco (Investments) v Commission

65

2010/C 288/117

Case T-34/06: Order of the General Court of 1 September 2010 — Universal v Commission

65

2010/C 288/118

Case T-88/07: Order of the General Court of 1 September 2010 — Fabryka Samochodòw Osobowych v Commission

66

2010/C 288/119

Joined Cases T-440/07 and T-1/08: Order of the General Court of 3 September 2010 — Huta Buczek v Commission

66

2010/C 288/120

Case T-125/09: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Gruener Janura v OHIM — Centum Aqua Marketing (Hundertwasser)

66

2010/C 288/121

Case T-505/09: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2010 — Carlyle v OHIM — MRP Consult (CAFE CARLYLE)

66

2010/C 288/122

Case T-506/09: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2010 — Carlyle v OHIM — MRP Consult (THE CARLYLE)

66

2010/C 288/123

Case T-49/10: Order of the General Court of 11 August 2010 — Footwear v OHIM — Reno Schuhcentrum (swiss cross FOOTWEAR)

66

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2010/C 288/124

Case F-27/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Hanschmann v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

67

2010/C 288/125

Case F-28/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Kipp v European Police Office (Europol), (Civil service — Europol staff — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the staff regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of the rights of defence)

67

2010/C 288/126

Case F-34/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Sluiter v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

68

2010/C 288/127

Case F-35/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Visser-Fornt Raya v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

68

2010/C 288/128

Case F-36/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Armitage-Wilson v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

69

2010/C 288/129

Case F-37/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Doyle v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

69

2010/C 288/130

Case F-38/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Martin v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

70

2010/C 288/131

Case F-39/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Goddijn v European Police Office (Europol) (Public service — Europol staff — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract for an indefinite period — Article 6 of Europol Staff Regulations — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

70

2010/C 288/132

Case F-41/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Roumimper v European Police Office (Europol) (Public service — Europol staff — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract for an indefinite period — Article 6 Europol Staff Regulation — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

71

2010/C 288/133

Case F-42/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Esneau-Kappé v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

71

2010/C 288/134

Case F-44/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Knöll v European Police Office (Europol) (Staff case — Europol employees — Non-renewal of a contract — Contract of indefinite duration — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

72

2010/C 288/135

Case F-91/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 9 July 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Public service — Officials — Reasonable time-limits for bringing a claim for damages — Out of time)

72

2010/C 288/136

Case F-103/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 July 2010 — Allen and Others v Commission (Civil service — Staff employed at the JET project — Actions for damages — Reasonable period — Out of time)

72

2010/C 288/137

Case F-11/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Palou Martínez v Commission (Public service — Officials — Manifestly inadmissible — Delay — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Article 35(1)(e) of the Rules of Procedure)

73

2010/C 288/138

Case F-65/10: Action brought on 6 August 2010 — Mata Blanco v Commission

73

2010/C 288/139

Case F-66/10: Action brought on 17 August 2010 — De Britto Patricio-Dias v Commission

74

2010/C 288/140

Case F-67/10: Action brought on 18 August 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission

74

2010/C 288/141

Case F-68/10: Action brought on 20 August 2010 — Behnke v Commission

74

2010/C 288/142

Case F-69/10: Action brought on 24 August 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission

75

2010/C 288/143

Case F-70/10: Action brought on 27 August 2010 — Hidalgo v European Parliament

75

2010/C 288/144

Case F-30/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 June 2010 — Hanot v Commission

76

2010/C 288/145

Case F-86/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 July 2010 — Vereecken v Commission

76

2010/C 288/146

Case F-26/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 9 July 2010 — Potoms and Scillia v Parliament

76

2010/C 288/147

Case F-29/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 July 2010 — Quadu v Parliament

76

---

(*1)Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

| | |
| --- | --- |

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN