alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bundy Road

I-94

oade Rontag uster FrC

4th

ts

US 312

1

¤£ 3

r ad

Sherrod h

ail o

t

R

43

notloC

¦§ ̈

keerC ylF

Lower Canal

Pompeys Pillar National Monument, 

National Historic Landmark and

Area of Critical Environmental Concern

R30E

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Miles

Map 121

90

T

3

N

Map scale 1:24,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Pompeys P i llar Cr

ee k

o n e R i v e r

Ye l l o w s t

312

94

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Wyoming

Location Map Legend

Montana

Ü

National Historic Landmark

National Monument

Area of Critical Environmental Concern

Roads

Public Lands Survey System

Streams

Bureau of Land Management

Bureau of Reclamation

Yellowstone River

Private

Billings 

Field 

Office
§ 27.1401 Anticollision light system. ( a ) *General.* If certification for night operation is requested, the rotorcraft must have an anticollision light system that— ( 1 ) Consists of one or more approved anticollision lights located so that their emitted light will not impair the crew's vision or detract from the conspicuity of the position lights; and
( 2 ) Meets the requirements of paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section.
( b ) *Field of coverage.* The system must consist of enough lights to illuminate the vital areas around the rotorcraft, considering the physical configuration and flight characteristics of the rotorcraft. The field of coverage must extend in each direction within at least 30 degrees below the horizontal plane of the rotorcraft, except that there may be solid angles of obstructed visibility totaling not more than 0.5 steradians.
( c ) *Flashing characteristics.* The arrangement of the system, that is, the number of light sources, beam width, speed of rotation, and other characteristics, must give an effective flash frequency of not less than 40, nor more than 100, cycles per minute. The effective flash frequency is the frequency at which the rotorcraft's complete anticollision light system is observed from a distance, and applies to each sector of light including any overlaps that exist when the system consists of more than one light source. In overlaps, flash frequencies may exceed 100, but not 180, cycles per minute.
( d ) *Color.* Each anticollision light must be aviation red and must meet the applicable requirements of § 27.1397.
( e ) *Light intensity.* The minimum light intensities in any vertical plane, measured with the red filter (if used) and expressed in terms of “effective” intensities, must meet the requirements of paragraph (f) of this section. The following relation must be assumed: where: *I* *e* = effective intensity (candles). *I(t)* = instantaneous intensity as a function of time. *t* 2−*t* 1 = flash time interval (seconds). Normally, the maximum value of effective intensity is obtained when *t* 2 and *t* 1 are chosen so that the effective intensity is equal to the instantaneous intensity at *t* 2 and *t* 1.
( f ) *Minimum effective intensities for anticollision light.* Each anticollision light effective intensity must equal or exceed the applicable values in the following table:
Angle above or below the horizontal plane
Effective intensity (candles) 0° to 5°
150 5° to 10°
90 10° to 20°
30 20° to 30°
15
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-6, 36 FR 12972, July 10, 1971; Amdt. 27-10, 41 FR 5290, Feb. 5, 1976]
§ 25.115 Takeoff flight path. ( a ) The takeoff flight path shall be considered to begin 35 feet above the takeoff surface at the end of the takeoff distance determined in accordance with § 25.113(a) or (b), as appropriate for the runway surface condition.
( b ) The net takeoff flight path data must be determined so that they represent the actual takeoff flight paths (determined in accordance with § 25.111 and with paragraph (a) of this section) reduced at each point by a gradient of climb equal to— ( 1 ) 0.8 percent for two-engine airplanes;
( 2 ) 0.9 percent for three-engine airplanes; and
( 3 ) 1.0 percent for four-engine airplanes.
( c ) The prescribed reduction in climb gradient may be applied as an equivalent reduction in acceleration along that part of the takeoff flight path at which the airplane is accelerated in level flight.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-92, 63 FR 8320, Feb. 18, 1998]
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
 
 SECTION 302 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND
 ACCOUNTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION
 
 **RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Lawrence R. Kuhnert, the Vice Chairman of Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), President and Chief Operating Officer of Critical Home Care, Inc., certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Critical Home Care, Inc.; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 (b)
[omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; 
 (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 Dated: January 12, 2005



/s/ Lawrence R. KuhnertLawrence R. KuhnertVice Chairman of Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), President and Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Quicksilver
Resources Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; and3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report.
  /s/ Glenn DardenGlenn DardenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
PMN PL5AJ6

Generalized Chemical Structure

Diagram
#### § 135.73 Inspections and tests.

Each certificate holder and each person employed by the certificate holder shall allow the Administrator, at any time or place, to make inspections or tests (including en route inspections) to determine the holder's compliance with the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, applicable regulations, and the certificate holder's operating certificate, and operations specifications.
#### LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE R. R. CO. v. ROBERTS

(Decided January 12th, 1915.)

Appeal from Gadsden City Court.

Heard before Hon. Jopin H. Disque.

Jones, Foster & Fields, for appellant. McCord & Davis, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Dismissed by appellant.
EXHIBIT 10.43




 




AMENDMENT


TO THE SPLIT DOLLAR AGREEMENT


AND POLICY ENDORSEMENT WITH




 




 




CENTRAL VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK




 




This Amendment, made and

entered into this

             day

of 

                   

by and between Central Valley Community Bank f/k/a  as Clovis Community Bank, a

Bank organized and existing under the laws of the State of California,

hereinafter referred to as the, “Bank”, and

                        ,

a Director of the Bank, hereinafter referred to as the, “Director”, shall

effectively amend the Split Dollar Agreement and Policy Endorsement with

Central Valley Community Bank as specifically set forth herein.




 




1.)            The following life insurance policy

shall be deleted from said agreement:




Jefferson

Pilot Life Insurance Company policy number                         ,

and replaced with the following “Insurer” and “Policy Number”:




 




Insurer:  Jefferson Pilot Life Policy Number:

                        




 




2.)                                   To

replace Clovis Community Bank as set forth in said Split Dollar Agreement and

Policy Endorsement with Central Valley Community Bank. Any references to Clovis

Community Bank in said agreement shall be references to Central Valley

Community Bank throughout said agreement as the one shall mean the other and

shall have the same force and effect.




 




This Amendment

shall be effective the

            day of 

                        ,

2003.




 




To the extent

that any paragraph, term, or provision of the aforestated Agreement is not

specifically amended herein, or in any other amendment thereto, said paragraph,

term, or provision shall remain in full force and effect as set forth in said

agreement.




 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto acknowledge

that each has carefully read this Amendment and executed the original thereof

on the first day set forth hereinabove, and that, upon execution, each has

received a conforming copy.




 




 




	

   


  	

  CENTRAL VALLEY COMMUNITY


  BANK F/K/A AS CLOVIS


  COMMUNITY BANK


  	 

	

   


  	

  Clovis,

  California


  	 

	

   


  	

   


  	

  By: 


  	

   


  	

   


  	 

	

  Witness


  	

   


  	

   Title


  
	

   


  	

   


  	 

	

   


  	

   


  	

   


  	

   


  	 

	

  Witness


  	

  Director
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements of Global Crossing Limited (Form S-8 No.’s 333-121079, 333-125281, and 333-133520 and Form S-3 No. 333-133466) of our reports dated March 7, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Global Crossing Limited and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Global Crossing Limited, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

Iselin, New Jersey 

March 7, 2008
Douglas „.„. 

## i Saitta investigation report by failing to challenge the alleged errors on direct appeal from a conviction and sentence). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED. 1

cc: Brick P. Houston, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City

'We direct the clerk of this court to file petitioner's "affidavit," provisionally received in this court on January 11, 2013. We have considered both the affidavit and petitioner's June 14, 2012, supplement in resolving this petition.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) I947A 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 132983(75)(78) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF Justices 

TRANSPORTATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC: 132983 

v COA: 256038 

Kent CC: 01-007548-CC 

RODNEY TOMKINS and DARCY TOMKINS, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motions by Ackerman, Ackerman & 

Dynowski and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy for leave to file briefs amicus 

curiae are considered and they are GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 30, 2007 

 Clerk
#### State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners, Relators, v. Tavares & Gulf Railroad Company, a Corporation, Respondent.

Petition for alternative writ of mandamus.

F. M. Hudson, for Relators.

W. J. Oven, for Respondent.

Dismissed on motion of counsel for relators, October 29th, 1912.
EXHIBIT 32.1







Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Peter Klamka, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Cephas Holding Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge:



1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012.





|                        |     |                                                            | 
|----------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: November 11, 2013 | By: | /s/ Peter Klamka                                           | 
|                        |     | Name: Peter Klamka                                         | 
|                        |     | Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, W ashington 98057 - 3356

May 16, 2013 Mr. Robert Wagner Vice President Plane Antenna and Security Sy stems 402 Park Place Drive Hewitt, Texas 76643 Dear M r . Wagner : We received your April 5, 2013 petition for exemption from the requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25. 571(e)(1), for Boeing Model 737 - 900 airplanes. The exemption would grant a 12 month ex e m ption for the bird strike requirement of § 25.571(e)(1) to ensure that Plane Antenna and Security S ys tems has time to design, fabricate, and install a net that will secure any large debris from hitting the empennage, or comply by some other means . This request, which you submitted to the Department of Transportation’s Federal Docket Management S ys tem (FDMS), has be en given Docket No . FAA - 2013 - 0433 . We are reviewing your request and will contact you if we need additional information. I f you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Todd Martin, ANM - 115 at 425 - 227 - 1178 or e - mail Todd.Martin @faa.gov. Sincerel y, Michael Menkin Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service
Exhibit B

Summary of Hours and Fees by Project Category

EXHIBIT B: SUMMARY OF FEES INCURRED DURING THE INTERIM PERIOD BY PROJECT CATEGORY

Matter Category Description Hours 100% Fees

20000797P00001.1.1 Planning & Coordination / Case Management - $ -

20000797P00001.1.2 Meetings and Communications with Committee Members and/or Professionals - -

20000797P00001.1.3 Communication with Interested Parties - -

20000797P00001.1.4 Liquidity and Cash Management - -

20000797P00001.1.5 Fiscal Plan and Related Budgets Analysis and Assessment - -

20000797P00001.1.6 Financial and Other Diligence - -

20000797P00001.1.7 Sales of Assets - -

20000797P00001.1.8 Due Diligence of Commonwealth Assets - -

20000797P00001.1.9 Debt Capacity - -

20000797P00001.1.10 Investments in Puerto Rico, Including Public-Private Partnerships - -

20000797P00001.1.11 Plan of Adjustment Review and Negotiations - -

20000797P00001.1.12 Litigation Support and Claims Analysis - -

20000797P00001.1.13 Testimony / Court Appearance - -

20000797P00001.1.14 Expert Reports - -

20000797P00001.1.15 Pension Matters - -

20000797P00001.1.16 Retention 4.6 3,574.00

20000797P00001.1.17 Fee Statements and Fee Applications 13.1 11,256.50

20000797P00001.1.18 PREPA Title III 480.7 486,784.00

20000797P00001.1.19 HTA Title III - -

20000797P00001.1.20 ERS Title III - -

Total 498.4 $ 501,614.50

Less: Agreed Upon Fee Reduction for 17th Interim Period - $ (153.00)

Grand Total 498.4 $ 501,461.50

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24746-2 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 18:55:37 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 1 of 1
#### § 151.119 Advance planning proposals: Procedures; funding.

The funding information required by § 151.23, except the last sentence, also is required in connection with an advance planning proposal. The sponsor's share of estimated proposal costs may not consist of or include the value of donated labor, materials, or equipment.
§ 25.1045 Cooling test procedures. ( a ) Compliance with § 25.1041 must be shown for the takeoff, climb, en route, and landing stages of flight that correspond to the applicable performance requirements. The cooling tests must be conducted with the airplane in the configuration, and operating under the conditions, that are critical relative to cooling during each stage of flight. For the cooling tests, a temperature is “stabilized” when its rate of change is less than two degrees F. per minute.
( b ) Temperatures must be stabilized under the conditions from which entry is made into each stage of flight being investigated, unless the entry condition normally is not one during which component and the engine fluid temperatures would stabilize (in which case, operation through the full entry condition must be conducted before entry into the stage of flight being investigated in order to allow temperatures to reach their natural levels at the time of entry). The takeoff cooling test must be preceded by a period during which the powerplant component and engine fluid temperatures are stabilized with the engines at ground idle.
( c ) Cooling tests for each stage of flight must be continued until— ( 1 ) The component and engine fluid temperatures stabilize;
( 2 ) The stage of flight is completed; or
( 3 ) An operating limitation is reached.
( d ) For reciprocating engine powered airplanes, it may be assumed, for cooling test purposes, that the takeoff stage of flight is complete when the airplane reaches an altitude of 1,500 feet above the takeoff surface or reaches a point in the takeoff where the transition from the takeoff to the en route configuration is completed and a speed is reached at which compliance with § 25.121(c) is shown, whichever point is at a higher altitude. The airplane must be in the following configuration: ( 1 ) Landing gear retracted.
( 2 ) Wing flaps in the most favorable position.
( 3 ) Cowl flaps (or other means of controlling the engine cooling supply) in the position that provides adequate cooling in the hot-day condition.
( 4 ) Critical engine inoperative and its propeller stopped.
( 5 ) Remaining engines at the maximum continuous power available for the altitude.
( e ) For hull seaplanes and amphibians, cooling must be shown during taxiing downwind for 10 minutes, at five knots above step speed.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-57, 49 FR 6848, Feb. 23, 1984]
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JONATAN C ARDENAS-NAVA, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-70348 Age n c y No. A095-447-113 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2014 ** B e fore : C LIFTON, B EA, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Jona ta n C arde na s-Nava , a

native and c itiz e n

of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B o ard of Im

m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny i ng his m otion to re ope n. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a buse of disc re tion the de nia l of a

m otion to re ope n, a

nd re vie w de novo que stions of la w. Ordone

z v . 

# FIL ED MAY27 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).IN

S , 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th C i r. 2003). W e de ny the pe tition for re v ie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in de ny ing C arde na s-Nava ’ s m otion to re ope n on the ground tha

t the e v ide nc e he subm itte d wa s insuffic ie nt to e sta blish prim a fa c ie e ligibility

for c anc e lla

tion of re m ova l whe re he did not a rtic ulate any ha rdship to his ne

w qua lify ing re lative . Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1229b(b)(1)(D) (a p plic ant m ust e s ta blish tha t re m ova l would re sult in e xc e ptiona l a n d e xtre m e ly

unusua l ha rdship to a

qua lify ing re lative ); se e also Partap v . Holde r , 603 F.3d 1173, 1175 (9th C ir. 2010) (pe r c uriam ) (no a buse of disc re t ion in de ny ing m otion to re m and to a p ply for c an c e lla

tion a fte r the birth of a

U.S. c itiz e n

c hild whe re pe titione r “ d id not te nde r any

e vide n c e showing e xc e ptiona l a n d e xtre m e ly

unusua l ha

rdship” ) (inte rna l quota

t ion m a rks om itte d). C arde na s-Nava ’ s c onte ntion tha t he is not re q

uire d to submit e v ide nc e of ha rdship to de m onstra

te prim a fa c ie e l igibility for re lie f in a m otion to re ope n be fore the B IA la c ks m e rit. Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Ordone z , 345 F.3d a

t 785 (a m otion to re ope n will not be grante d unle ss the a

p plic ant e sta

blishe s a c a se of prim a fa c i e e ligibility

for the unde rly ing re lie f sought.) PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE W DE NIE D.

1 2 - 7 0 3 4 8 2