alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3421

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

30 West Bel Air Avenue in Aberdeen, Maryland, as the ‘‘Ripken Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2003

Mr. RUPPERSBERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 30 West Bel Air Avenue in Aberdeen, Maryland, as the ‘‘Ripken Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RIPKEN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 30 West Bel Air Avenue in Aber6 deen, Maryland, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Ripken Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2

•HR 3421 IH 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Ripken Post Office 

3 Building.

Æ
§ 135.203 VFR: Minimum altitudes. Except when necessary for takeoff and landing, no person may operate under VFR— ( a ) An airplane— ( 1 ) During the day, below 500 feet above the surface or less than 500 feet horizontally from any obstacle; or
( 2 ) At night, at an altitude less than 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of 5 miles from the course intended to be flown or, in designated mountainous terrain, less than 2,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of 5 miles from the course intended to be flown; or
( b ) A helicopter over a congested area at an altitude less than 300 feet above the surface.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

South

SEUSE%
Sec. 17, T. 285., R. 22 E.

© 900 1800 cpm

PLEISTOCENE
Terrace sand

PLIOCENE
Bone Valley formation

2
SWYNEY

Sec. 5, T. 285., R. 22 E.

© 900 cpm

MIDDLE MIOCENE
Hawthorn formation

LOWER MIOCENE ~{
Tampa limestone

is

aaa
fl
i

FEEH

It,

EXPLANATION

Lithologic symbols

Sand

Ey

Iron cementation or
staining; hardpan

g
2

Phosphate nodules

Chert fragments

Calcareous clay

Oi

No recovery, core lost

A mixture of symbols indicates
© mixed lithology

Other symbols
Lithologic correlation

Stratigraphic correlation

Limits of aluminum ond
calcium phosphate zones

Alternating symbols indicate two or
three of the above correlations
follow the same line

F.

Section of core from which fossils
were identified

5

Sample number and interval sampled
from lat 2545

ce “em

Trace of gamma-ray log showing
intensity of radiation; cpm =
counts per minute

3

NEYSEY
Sec. 31, T. 275., R. 22 E.

© 900 cpm

4

SWANEY
Sec. 19, T. 275S., R. 22 E.

2 900 cpm

/

/OLIGOCENE
/ Suwannee

limestone

Scale, in feet
oO

20

CROSS SECTION 1, LAND-PEBBLE PHOSPHATE DISTRICT, FLORIDA

BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 16

North

5

SW%
Sec. 6, T. 275.,R. 22 E.

© 900 cpm

Elevation, in feet
r-!20

t-100

t+ 60

+40

20

466352 © - 59 (In pocket)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

t1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143755 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143755 

 COA: 301975 

Oakland CC: 2005-201445-FC 

SAMUEL BERNARD PROFFITT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,2003 (the “Form 10-KSB”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, Domingo Rodriguez,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)           the Form 10-KSB fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in the Form10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-KSB.

 

 
| Date:  March 29, 2004 |   | /s/    | Domingo  Rodriguez                                                    |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   |   | Domingo  Rodriguez  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# Official Journal C 60A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.060.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 60A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5311 March 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.060.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 60A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5311 March 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2010/C 060A/01 | Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2010/C 060A/01

Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |
| 53 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 60 | |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

53

56

57

60

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### § 147.3 Certificate required.

No person may operate an aviation maintenance technician school without, or in violation of, an aviation maintenance technician school certificate and the operations specifications issued under this part.
# Amtsblatt C 38A/4. F

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 38A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 58. Jahrgang4. Februar 2015 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 38A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

58. Jahrgang4. Februar 2015

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 038A/01 | Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/272/13 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD 7) deutscher Sprache (DE) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

2015/C 038A/01

Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/272/13 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD 7) deutscher Sprache (DE)

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE
1

EXHIBIT F

LIST OF PROFESSIONALS BY MATTER

Matter 

Number Matter Name Timekeeper Name Initials Position

396-00002 General

Juan J. Casillas JJC Partner

Cristina Fernandez CF Junior Partner

Paralegal Services PLS Paralegal

396-00006 PREPA

Juan J. Casillas JJC Partner

Luis Llach LLL Partner

Christopher Rivera CR Junior Partner

Cristina Fernandez CF Junior Partner

Juan Nieves JN Junior Partner

Natalia Del Nido ND Junior Partner

Paola Ayala PA Associate

Paralegal Services PLS Paralegal

396-00015 Fee Application

Juan J. Casillas JJC Partner

Luis Llach LLL Partner

Paralegal Services PLS Paralegal

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24754-8 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 19:53:36 Desc:

Exhibit F Page 1 of 1
§ 145.55 Duration and renewal of certificate. ( a ) A certificate or rating issued to a repair station located in the United States is effective from the date of issue until the repair station surrenders the certificate and the FAA accepts it for cancellation, or the FAA suspends or revokes it.
( b ) A certificate or rating issued to a repair station located outside the United States is effective from the date of issue until the last day of the 12th month after the date of issue unless the repair station surrenders the certificate and the FAA accepts it for cancellation, or the FAA suspends or revokes it. The FAA may renew the certificate or rating for 24 months if the repair station has operated in compliance with the applicable requirements of part 145 within the preceding certificate duration period.
( c ) A certificated repair station located outside the United States that applies for a renewal of its repair station certificate must— ( 1 ) Submit its request for renewal no later than 30 days before the repair station's current certificate expires. If a request for renewal is not made within this period, the repair station must follow the application procedures in § 145.51.
( 2 ) Send its request for renewal to the FAA office that has jurisdiction over the certificated repair station.
( 3 ) Show that the fee prescribed by the FAA has been paid.
( d ) The holder of an expired, surrendered, suspended, or revoked certificate must return it to the FAA.
[Doc. No. FAA-1999-5836, 66 FR 41117, Aug. 6, 2001, as amended by Amdt. 145-30, 79 FR 46984, Aug. 12, 2014]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 1 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 2 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 3 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 4 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 5 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 6 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 7 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 8 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 9 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 10 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 11 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-17 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 17 - JUDGMENT Page 12 of 12
§ 107.29 Operation at night. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, no person may operate a small unmanned aircraft system at night unless— ( 1 ) The remote pilot in command of the small unmanned aircraft has completed an initial knowledge test or training, as applicable, under § 107.65 after April 6, 2021; and
( 2 ) The small unmanned aircraft has lighted anti-collision lighting visible for at least 3 statute miles that has a flash rate sufficient to avoid a collision. The remote pilot in command may reduce the intensity of, but may not extinguish, the anti-collision lighting if he or she determines that, because of operating conditions, it would be in the interest of safety to do so.
( b ) No person may operate a small unmanned aircraft system during periods of civil twilight unless the small unmanned aircraft has lighted anti-collision lighting visible for at least 3 statute miles that has a flash rate sufficient to avoid a collision. The remote pilot in command may reduce the intensity of, but may not extinguish, the anti-collision lighting if he or she determines that, because of operating conditions, it would be in the interest of safety to do so.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (b) of this section, civil twilight refers to the following: ( 1 ) Except for Alaska, a period of time that begins 30 minutes before official sunrise and ends at official sunrise;
( 2 ) Except for Alaska, a period of time that begins at official sunset and ends 30 minutes after official sunset; and
( 3 ) In Alaska, the period of civil twilight as defined in the Air Almanac.
( d ) After May 17, 2021, no person may operate a small unmanned aircraft system at night in accordance with a certificate of waiver issued prior to April 21, 2021 under § 107.200. The certificates of waiver issued prior to March 16, 2021 under § 107.200 that authorize deviation from § 107.29 terminate on May 17, 2021.
[Docket FAA-2015-0150, Amdt. 107-1, 81 FR 42209, June 28, 2016, as amended by Amdt. No. 107-8, 86 FR 4382, Jan. 15, 2021; 86 FR 13631, Mar. 10, 2020]
---

Exhibit 12.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Chelsea Oil and Gas, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, William Petrie, Sr., Executive
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jesse Meidl, Director
of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

By:
    /s/
      William Petrie, Sr.William Petrie, Sr.Executive Chairman, Chelsea Oil and Gas, Ltd.By:
    /s/
      Jesse MeidlJesse MeidlDirector, Chelsea Oil and Gas, Ltd.


April 30, 2018

---
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of APA Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anil K.
Jain, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 5, 2004


Signature:  /s/  Anil K. Jain
           ------------------
Print Name: Anil K. Jain
            ------------
Print Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
             ---------------------------------------------------


                                        1
<PAGE>
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 3 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 4 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 5 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 6 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 7 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 8 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 9 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 10 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 11 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 12 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 13 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 14 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 15 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 16 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 17 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 18 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 19 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 20 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 21 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 22 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 23 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 24 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 25 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 26 of 27
oc#:2488-4 Filed:02/13/18 Entered:02/13/18 17:14:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 27 of 27
#### BALTIMORE EQUITABLE SOCIETY v. UNITED STATES

[77 C.Cls. 566; 290 U.S. 662]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court October 9, 1933.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Crossing Limited (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Legere, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    John J. Legere  
|John J. Legere         
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 11, 2008
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS FEDERALAVIATIONADMINISTRATIORECEIVED

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Complainant,
vs. Nouveau Laboratories, LLC, d/b/a Covermark USA Respondent. 

## JUN ..**~:** 

## 201 

# ·-ARING DOCKET

Docket No. FAA-2011-0488 FAA Case No. 201080700318 Judge J.E. Sullivan

I co 

### COMPLAINANT'S PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE NoThe Complainant, pursuant to the Administrative Law Judge's Order served April 3, 2012, herebyproposes to the following Procedural Schedule: 1. Exchange ofany discovery requests byJune 6, 2012 ' 2. ·Exchange ofobjections to discovery requests byJune 13, 2003
.

. . . . 3. Discoveryresponses due July 6, 2012.

· · 4. Exchange oflist of

### expect~d witnesses, suiru.Tiaries

## 'oftheirproposed testimony, and exhibit lists to be filed byAugust 5, 2012. 5. Settlement was last discussed between the parties on April12, 2012. No settlement has beenreached. Complainantremains willing to discuss possible settlement and willnotify the Adihinistra:tive La\VJudge l.m'mediatel'y in the event tliat any agreement is reached. 6. Respondent was presented with the above schedule through certified mail on May 14, 2012'and has not objected to it. · ·

### Respectfully submitted this 24th day ofMay, 2012.

GERALD A. ELLIS Managing Attorney Office ofthe Regional Counsel 404-305-5200

- ..· . ., ..CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing Complainant's Proposed Procedural Schedule has been mailed this date by Certified Mail or sent via facsimile to the following:
The Honorable J.E. Sullivan DOT, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE East Building Ground Flopr Room E12-320 Washington, DC 20590 FAX: 202-366-7536 Keith Roberts Roberts Proprietaries, Inc. 180 West 80Th St. New York, NY 10024 Hearing Docket Clerk FAA, AGC-430, Suite 2W1000 Wilbur Wright Building 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591



## MAY 2.4 

## 2012 Dated (original Certified+ fax)

(1 copy Certified)

(1 copy Certified)
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
MTI Technology Corporation:

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-18501 and 33-80438) on Form S-8 of MTI Technology Corporation of our
report dated May 20, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MTI
Technology Corporation and subsidiaries as of April 5, 1997 and April 6, 1996
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficiency) and cash flows for the fiscal years ended April 5, 1997, April 6,
1996 and April 1, 1995, and related schedule, which report appears in the April
5, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of MTI Technology Corporation.



                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP




Orange County, California
July 2, 1997
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

SHELLY SEBASTIAN VERSUS 

### LOUISIANA STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, KIM GANN, AND IRVING FELPS NO. 

### 2021 CW 1496
FEBRUARY 25, 2022

In Re: 

### Shelly Sabastian, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial 

### District Court, Parish of East Baton 

### Rouge, No. 697, 794.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., 

### PENZATOAND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. The writ application 

### did not 

### include 

## documentation ofthe return date in violation of Rule 4-3 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Thus, we cannot 

# determinewhetherthewritapplicationwastimelyfiled.

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application for 

### rehearing will not be considered. Rules 

### 2- 18. 7 4- 

### 9, 

### Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts ofAppeal. In the event relator seeks to 

### file a new application with this court, it must contain all pertinent 

### documentation, 

## including the missing items noted above, must 

### comply with Rule 2- 12. 211 Uniform Rules of 

### Louisiana Courts of Appeal, and must show that 

### any 

## delay in 

## filing was not due to the applicant' s fault. Rule 4- 3, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. 

### Any new application must be filed on or before March 

### 28, 2022, 

### and must contain a copy of this ruling. VGW AHP CHH



### COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### DEPUTY OLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT