alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO

TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA

SALA SUPERIOR DE SAN JUAN

SISTEMA DE RETIRO DE LA 

UNIVERSIDAD DE PUERTO RICO POR 

CONDUCTO DE LA JUNTA DE RETIRO DE 

LA UNIVERSIDAD DE PUERTO RICO; 

Parte Demandante

vs.

UNIVERSIDAD DE PUERTO RICO POR 

CONDUCTO DE LA JUNTA DE GOBIERNO 

DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE PUERTO RICO,

CPA RICARDO DALMAU SANTANA, 

PRESIDENTE DE LA JUNTA DE 

GOBIERNO DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE 

PUERTO RICO, ENTIDAD XYZ

Parte Demandada

CIVIL NÚM: SJ2023CV04406

SOBRE:

INTERDICTO PRELIMINAR Y 

PERMANENTE, SENTENCIA 

DECLARATORIA 

MOCIÓN PARA PROVEER PROYECTOS DE EMPLAZAMIENTO

AL HONORABLE TRIBUNAL:

COMPARECE la Parte Demandante de epígrafe, mediante la representación legal que 

suscribe, y muy respetuosamente EXPONE, ALEGA Y SOLICITA: 

1. Por este medio se aneja los proyectos de emplazamiento del caso de 

referencia.

2. Respetuosamente, se solicita de este Honorable Tribunal, que expida los

emplazamientos que se incluye con la presente Moción, para así

diligenciarlo. 

POR TODO LO CUAL, muy respetuosamente se solicita de este Honorable 

Tribunal, que expida el emplazamiento que se incluye con la presente Moción.

RESPETUOSAMENTE SOMETIDO.

En Ponce, Puerto Rico, a 11 de mayo de 2023.

CERTIFICO que conforme lo establece la Guía del Usuario del Portal de 

SUMAC, la presentación electrónica de este escrito constituirá la notificación que 

debe efectuarse entre abogados y abogadas, según disponen las Reglas de 

Procedimiento Civil, a los abogados de récord registrados en dicho sistema 

electrónico.

SJ2023CV04406 11/05/2023 05:36:52 pm Entrada Núm. 3 Página 1 de 2 SJ2023CV04406 11/05/2023 05:36:58 pm Entrada Núm. 3 Página 1 de 2 Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-45 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Motion submitting summons Dkt 3 Page 1 of 2
Sistema de Retiro de la UPR et al. v. UPR, et al.

Moción para proveer proyectos de emplazamiento 2

472 Ave. Tito Castro

Edificio Marvesa, Suite 106

Ponce, Puerto Rico 00716

Tel: (787) 848-0666

Fax: (787) 841-1435

notificaciones@bufeteemmanuelli.com

f/ Rafael Maldonado Pérez

Lcdo. Rafael Maldonado Pérez

RUA:15717

PO Box 194669

San Juan, PR 00919

Tel. (787) 553-8293

Fax (787) 765-3043

Rmaldonadolaw@gmail.com

f/ Rolando Emmanuelli

Jiménez

Lcdo. Rolando 

Emmanuelli Jiménez

RUA: 8509 CA: 9755

rolando@emmanuelli.law

f/ Jessica E. Méndez Colberg

Lcda. Jessica E. Méndez

Colberg

RUA: 19,853 CA: 19,774

jessica@emmanuelli.law

f/ Zoé C. Negrón Comas

Lcda. Zoé C. Negrón

Comas

RUA: 22,276 CA: 20935

zoe@emmanuelli.law

 

SJ2023CV04406 11/05/2023 05:36:52 pm Entrada Núm. 3 Página 2 de 2 SJ2023CV04406 11/05/2023 05:36:58 pm Entrada Núm. 3 Página 2 de 2 Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-45 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Motion submitting summons Dkt 3 Page 2 of 2
#### § 25.1433 Vacuum systems.

There must be means, in addition to the normal pressure relief, to automatically relieve the pressure in the discharge lines from the vacuum air pump when the delivery temperature of the air becomes unsafe.

[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29785, July 20, 1990]
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements of Global Crossing Limited (Form S-8 No.’s 333-121079, 333-125281, 333-133520 and 333-157705 and Form S-3 No. 333-159051) of our reports dated February 23, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statementsand schedule of Global Crossing Limited and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Global Crossing Limited, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Iselin, New Jersey 

February 23, 2010
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 93 ) IV-C-5

9 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:56

AM Sheet 93 of 232P. 2

J*" 0 "** * 

# -87-i i LX-C-S 9 I -5J Lt UNITED STATE S ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIO NAGENC Y ^ \gj^ L ° WASHINGTON , D.C. 20460 ^ ~ " ^ '**«** * FE B 4 198 8

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N

Honorabl e Josep hM . McDad e Unite d State s Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . McDad e Than k yo u fo r passing along you r comment s concerning EPA' s proposa l t o requir e onboar d refueling emissio n controls . B e assure d tha t thes e comment s wil l b e considere d a s w e prepar e ou r fina l rule . W e wil l als o b e placin g themi n th e publi c docke t fo r th e rulemaking (Docke t No . A-87-11) . Thank yo u agai n fo r you r concer n i n thi s matter . Sincerel yyours , C,?!GiNA LSIGNE D B Y RICHAR D D
. WILSO N Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s cc : Docke t A-87-1 1 Prepare d by : For

mLetter:SAL:2/l/88:AL88036 7 - ECTD , Ann Arbor , M I bcc : Regio n 0 3 Congressiona l Liaison/Quin n
§ 25.1307 Miscellaneous equipment. The following is required miscellaneous equipment: ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Two or more independent sources of electrical energy.
( c ) Electrical protective devices, as prescribed in this part.
( d ) Two systems for two-way radio communications, with controls for each accessible from each pilot station, designed and installed so that failure of one system will not preclude operation of the other system. The use of a common antenna system is acceptable if adequate reliability is shown.
( e ) Two systems for radio navigation, with controls for each accessible from each pilot station, designed and installed so that failure of one system will not preclude operation of the other system. The use of a common antenna system is acceptable if adequate reliability is shown.
[Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5678, Apr. 8, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 25-46, 43 FR 50598, Oct. 30, 1978; Amdt. 25-54, 45 FR 60173, Sept. 11, 1980; Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29785, July 20, 1990]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Icagen, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, P. Kay Wagoner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 9, 2011 |  | /s/ P. Kay Wagoner     
|                     |  | P. Kay Wagoner, Ph.D.  
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
---

KPMG LLP 205 5th Avenue SW
Suite 3100 Calgary AB T2P 4B9 Telephone (403) 691-8000 Fax
(403) 691-8008 www.kpmg.ca

April 28, 2017

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We were previously principal
accountants for Chelsea Oil and Gas Ltd. (the Company) and, under the date of
April 29, 2016, we reported on the consolidated financial statements of the
Company as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2015. On April 10, 2017, we were dismissed.
We have read the Company's statements included under Item 16.F of its Form 20-F
dated April 28, 2017, and we agree the such statements, except that we are not
in a position to agree or disagree with the Companys statements in the sixth
paragraph of Item 16.F nor that the change was considered and approved by the
board of directors of the Company.

This letter should not be regarded as
in any way updating the aforementioned report or representing that we performed
any procedures subsequent to the date of such report.

Very truly yours,

| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Chartered Professional
      Accountants                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | Calgary, Canada                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and
      a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
      with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss
      entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.

---
EXHIBIT 4.2


                        ROGER A. KIMMEL, JR. & ASSOCIATES
                               COUNSELLORS AT LAW
                           114 BARRINGTON TOWN SQUARE
                                    SUITE 159
                               AURORA, OHIO 44202
FAX: (330) 562-1669      TELEPHONE: (330) 995-0051    E-Mail:  KimmelLaw@aol.com

           Practice Limited to Matters Involving Corporate Securities


January 17, 2003

Gregory A. Pitner, President
Terra Block International, Inc.
2637 Erie Avenue, Suite 207
Cincinnati, Ohio 45208

     Re:  Letter of Engagement

Dear Mr. Pitner:

     This  letter will confirm our engagement to provide legal services to Terra
Block  International,  Inc.  commencing  this  day.

     We  have  agreed  to  act  as  special  corporate and securities counsel to
prepare  all  corporate  and securities documents, to-wit:  review of filings to
the  Securities  &  Exchange  Commission  ("SEC")  and  comment letters, if any;
prepare and prosecute the filing of an S-8 and other SEC filing forms such as 10
Q's  and  10-KSB's;  and provide all legal services with respect to your general
corporate  matters.

     Our  fees  will  be based primarily on the time spent by each professional,
although  other factors may be taken into consideration, e.g. rendering of legal
opinions.  The  billing  rates  charged  by  each  professional  are  subject to
adjustment from time to time.  The current billing rate of professionals who may
work  on  your  matters  is  $250  per  hour.

     We  will  bill you on a regular basis - normally, each month - for services
rendered,  and out-of-pocket expenses incurred.  Our statements are payable upon
receipt,  but  in  no  event  later  than  30  days  thereafter.

     We will require a retainer in the amount of $7,500 payable against services
to  be  rendered  with respect to this matter.  In the event that you prefer, we
would  consider  payment in the Company's common stock registered under S-8 at a
mutually  agreeable  price  per  share.


<PAGE>
     Thank you for retaining this firm.


                                         Sincerely,


                                         /s/ Roger A. Kimmel, Jr.
                                         ----------------------------
                                         Roger A. Kimmel, Jr.
                                         For the Firm


Agreed To And Accepted:

TERRA BLOCK CONSOLIDATED, INC.



By:  /s/ Gregory A. Pitner
     -----------------------------
     Gregory A. Pitner, President


<PAGE>
1 COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MAX GROSSMAN , Appellant , v. CITY OF EL PASO, Appellee. § § § § § § § No. 08 - 1 9 - 00 27 7 - CV

Appeal from the 3 84th District Court of El Paso C ounty, Texas (TC# 2017 - DCV2528 ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ON ORDER On October 24, 2019, Max Grossman filed an interlocutory appeal of the 384th District Court’s order denying his application for a temporary injunction in Trial Court Case No. 2017 - DCV2528. That appeal was docketed in this Court as Grossman v. City of El P aso , Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00272 - CV. On October 30, 2019, the City of El Paso filed a “Cross - Notice of Accelerated Appeal” challenging the 384th District Court’s order denying the City’s plea to the jurisdiction, also in Trial Court Case No. 2017 - DCV2528. That appeal was docketed in this Court as City of El Paso v. Grossman , Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00277 - CV. The City has moved to consolidate Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00277 - CV and Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00272 - CV into one appeal. Grossman opposes the City’s motion to consolidate. We f ind good2

cause to consolidate the two appeals into one appeal. As such, the City’s motion to consolidate these two appeals is GRANTED. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00277 - CV be consolidated with Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00272 - CV . We direct the C lerk of the Court to remove all documents from Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00277 - CV and refile them in Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00272 - CV . It is further ORDERED that all future pleadings be filed in and bear only Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00272 - CV. The consolidated proceedings will be captioned Grossman v. City of El Paso . Grossman will be referred to as the Appellant/Cross - Appellee. The City of El Paso will be referred to as the Appellee/Cross - Appellant. It is further ORDERED that Local Rule 1 dealing with briefs in cross - appeals will generally apply to these proceedings. The Court’s previous briefing schedule is hereby WITHDRAWN . A modified brie fing schedule superseding our prior briefing schedule will follow in the coming days once the status of the record is finally established. This order is limited solely to the issue of the City’s motion to consolidate, is solely administrative in nature, an d deals only with those issues explicitly mentioned herein. All other previous orders issued by this Court in Cause Nos. 08 - 19 - 00272 - CV and 08 - 19 - 00277 - CV, including orders related to emergency relief and record deadlines, remain in effect. Finally, the Court observes that by virtue of this consolidation action, it is unnecessary to keep the case file in Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00277 - CV open, since all matters that were originally docketed to be heard in that cause number have been re - docketed and wi ll now be heard in Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00272 - CV. As such, this Court ORDERS that Cause No. 08 - 19 - 00277 - CV be dismissed for administrative purposes due to consolidation. See Jones v. Powers , No. 08 - 19 - 00196 - CV, 2019 WL 3491936, at *1 (Tex.App. -- El Paso Aug. 1, 2019, no pet.)(mem. op.).3

November 27, 2019 PER CURIAM Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
          RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         I, Eric Bello, Treasurer (principal financial officer) of Quipp, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      * * *




/S/ Eric Bello
----------------
Eric Bello
Treasurer (principal financial officer)

Date:    August 12, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,466, TA-W-37,466A]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on April 13, 2000, applicable to workers of Rochester Button Company, South Boston, Virginia. The notice will be published soon in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. Information received by the company shows that worker separations occurred at the Kenbridge, Virginia location of Rochester Button Company. The workers are engaged in the production of polyester buttons.

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Rochester Button Company who were adversely affected by increased imports.

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover the workers of Rochester Button Company, Kenbridge, Virginia.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,466 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Rochester Button Company, South Boston, Virginia (TA-W-37,466), and Kenbridge, Virginia (TA-W-37,466A), who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 1, 1999, through April 13, 2002 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington D.C. this 27th day of April, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-11114  Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
§ 121.521 Flight time limitations: Crew of two pilots and one additional airman as required. ( a ) No certificate holder conducting supplemental operations may schedule an airman to be aloft as a member of the flight crew in an airplane that has a crew of two pilots and at least one additional flight crewmember for more than 12 hours during any 24 consecutive hours.
( b ) If an airman has been aloft as a member of a flight crew for 20 or more hours during any 48 consecutive hours or 24 or more hours during any 72 consecutive hours, he must be given at least 18 hours of rest before being assigned to any duty with the certificate holder. In any case, he must be relieved of all duty for at least 24 consecutive hours during any seven consecutive days.
( c ) No airman may be aloft as a flight crewmember more than— ( 1 ) 120 hours during any 30 consecutive days; or
( 2 ) 300 hours during any 90 consecutive days.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19218, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-17, 31 FR 1147, Jan. 28, 1966; Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2613, Jan. 26, 1996]
#### UNITED STATES v. HIGHLAND MILK CONDENSING CO.

[77 C.Cls. 745; 290 U.S. 671]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court, October 16, 1933.
Order entered January 12, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01294-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.V. AND S.V., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-11968-V

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Francis, and Justice Stoddart

Before the Court is the December 18, 2017 motion of Coppell Independent School 

District to dismiss appellant’s amended notice of appeal. We DENY the motion. 

On the Court’s own motion, we construe the amended notice of appeal as a notice of 

appeal and DIRECT the Clerk of this Court assign a new appellate cause number to the notice of 

appeal filed in this appeal on November 29, 2017. 

In the notice of appeal, appellant states he is appealing from the modification order in the 

suit affecting the parent-child relationship signed on October 20, 2017. A notice of appeal from 

that order was due on Monday, November 20, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. Appellant filed 

the notice of appeal, nine days past the deadline. However, because the notice of appeal was 

filed within fifteen days of the deadline, appellant can remedy the timeliness problem by filing, 

by January 22, 2017, a motion for extension of time that complies with rule of appellate 
procedure 10.5(b). See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b). We caution appellant that failure to file an 

extension motion within the time specified may result in dismissal of the appeal in the newly 

assigned appellate cause number without further notice.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Charles Vinick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2.
The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Charles VinickCharles VinickChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: January 20, 2011








In connection with the quarterly report of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Adrian Goldfarb, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2.
The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Adrian GoldfarbAdrian GoldfarbChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


Dated: January 20, 2011