alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
            AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific CMA, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bill
Stangland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (c)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (d)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



                                   By:  /s/Bill Stangland
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bill Stangland, Chief Financial Officer


Date: May 15, 2006
§ 152.107 Project eligibility: Airport development. ( a ) Except in the case of approved stage development, each project for airport development must provide for— ( 1 ) Development of an airport or unit of an airport that is safe, useful, and usable; or,
( 2 ) An additional facility that increases the safety, usefulness, and usability of an airport.
( b ) Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, a project for airport development must involve more than $25,000 in United States funds.
( c ) The development included in a project for airport development must— ( 1 ) In the opinion of the Administrator, be “airport development” as defined in § 152.3;
( 2 ) Be identified as airport development in the mandatory standards incorporated into this part by § 152.11; and
( 3 ) Be described in an approved airport layout plan.
( d ) The airport involved in a project for airport development must be included in the current NASP.
( e ) In complying with paragraph (a) of this section, the sponsor must— ( 1 ) Own, acquire, or agree to acquire control over, or a property interest in, runway clear zones that the Administrator considers adequate; and
( 2 ) Provide for approach and runway lighting systems satisfactory to the Administrator.
GenoMed, Inc Exhibit10.18



Exhibit 10.18

                              Contract to Serve on
                      GenoMed's Scientific Advisory Board


Date: 8/15/02



By my signature below I agree to serve as a member of the Scientific Advisory
Board (SAB) of GenoMed, LLC; (the "Company").


I understand and agree that my commitment to the Company is limited to the
following items:


     a. From time to time, to provide advice, consultation or assistance via
telephone conversation, email or FAX.

     b. To provide GenoMed with my curriculum vitae, of which a brief summary,
subject to my final editorial consent, will be included on GenoMed's website (at
www.genomedics.com).

     I understand and agree that I will not at any time or in any manner,
either directly or indirectly, divulge, disclose, or communicate in any manner
any information that is proprietary to the Company. I will protect such
information and treat it as strictly confidential.

     I understand that, as a member of the Company's Scientific Advisory Board,
I may be invited by the Company to participate in additional projects, such as
helping to explain the company's scientific approach to various funding entities
such as venture capital firms, or to analyze the company's scientific data, but
that these additional projects will be negotiated on a case by case basis, and
that I am in no way obligated to perform such duties by the current contract.


     I understand and agree that the Scientific Advisory Board Contract will be
a five (5) year agreement, but that it can be terminated on 30 days' written
notice by either party for any reason whatsoever. The compensation for my
services will be paid by the Company as follows:


1. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company, exercisable upon
the first anniversary from the date of this Contract.


2. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
second anniversary from the date of this Contract.


3. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
third anniversary from the date of this Contract.


4. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
fourth anniversary from the date of this Contract.


5. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
fifth anniversary from the date of this Contract.




Signed:/s/ Frank Johnson                     Date 8/15/02


For GenoMed, Inc:
Signed:/s/ David W. Moskowitz                Date 9/3/02
§ 121.633 Considering time-limited systems in planning ETOPS alternates. ( a ) For ETOPS up to and including 180 minutes, no person may list an airport as an ETOPS Alternate Airport in a dispatch or flight release if the time needed to fly to that airport (at the approved one-engine inoperative cruise speed under standard conditions in still air) would exceed the approved time for the airplane's most limiting ETOPS Significant System (including the airplane's most limiting fire suppression system time for those cargo and baggage compartments required by regulation to have fire-suppression systems) minus 15 minutes.
( b ) For ETOPS beyond 180 minutes, no person may list an airport as an ETOPS Alternate Airport in a dispatch or flight release if the time needed to fly to that airport: ( 1 ) at the all engine operating cruise speed, corrected for wind and temperature, exceeds the airplane's most limiting fire suppression system time minus 15 minutes for those cargo and baggage compartments required by regulation to have fire suppression systems (except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section), or
( 2 ) at the one-engine-inoperative cruise speed, corrected for wind and temperature, exceeds the airplane's most limiting ETOPS Significant System time (other than the airplane's most limiting fire suppression system time minus 15 minutes for those cargo and baggage compartments required by regulation to have fire-suppression systems).
( c ) For turbine-engine powered airplanes with more than two engines, the certificate holder need not meet paragraph (b)(1) of this section until February 15, 2013.
[Doc. No. FAA-2002-6717, 72 FR 1882, Jan. 16, 2007]
#### § 222.1 Applicability.

This part applies to all air transportation of property that includes both air movement by a direct foreign air carrier and surface transportation to or from any point within the United States (hereafter referred to as “intermodal cargo services”).
Exhibit 99.8














March 30, 2017





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016  of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the "Company") of our report dated February 21, 2017, relating to the consolidated financial statements  and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in Exhibit 99.3 incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F.





We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-211926, 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820) and Form F-10, as amended, (No. 333-196906) of the Company of our report dated February 21, 2017  referred to above.











Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants





Toronto, Ontario, Canada
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41599 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

–

Appellee ,

v ersus
ISRAEL GARZA , Defendant

– Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:13

- CR

- 1064

- 1

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Israel Garza contests his 240

- month prison term for possession with

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited ci rcumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 27, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41599 Document: 00513736944 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/27/2016No. 15

- 41599

2 intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine . He contends that the district court could sentence him to only a ten

- year maximum because the information filed under 21 U.S.C. § 851 indicated that the enhancement was being sought under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(b). T he g overnment moves to dismiss the appeal on the basis that Garza failed to file a timely notice of appeal. The record supports the g overnment’s contention. Garza filed his notice

o f appeal almost eighteen months after entry of judgment, well beyond the fourteen days that is permitted and also well beyond the time during which the district court could have granted an extension on a showing of either excusable neglect or good cause. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i), (b)(4) ; United States v. Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000)

. Although the untimely fil ing of an appeal in a criminal case is not jurisdictional , see United States v. Martinez , 496 F.3d 387, 388

– 89 (5th Cir. 2007 ) , this court will not disregard untimeliness where the g overnment raises the issue, see Eberhart v. United States , 546 U.S. 12, 18 (2005).

T he motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as untimely

. Case: 15-41599 Document: 00513736944 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/27/2016
#### § 1253.120 Transfers of property.

If a recipient sells or otherwise transfers property financed in whole or in part with Federal financial assistance to a transferee that operates any education program or activity, and the Federal share of the fair market value of the property is not upon such sale or transfer properly accounted for to the Federal Government, both the transferor and the transferee shall be deemed to be recipients, subject to the provisions of §§ 1253.205 through 1253.235(a).
#### R. J. Owens, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam

— It clearly appears expressly or by necessary implication that the defendant whether for himself or as the agent of a corporation lending money in this State, did by contract, directly or indirectly, by way of fees or otherwise wilfully and knowingly charge the borrower of money a sum of money greater than the sum loaned and twenty-five per centum per annum thereon. This authorized a conviction under the statute.

A rehearing is denied.
#### Campbell v. Lytle

*John Q. Stranahan,*for plaintiff.

*William J. Joyce,*for defendant.

September 12, 1957.

Rodgers, P. J.,

— The following facts were established by stipulation. The Registration Commission of Mercer County scheduled a special regis*576tration to be held on August 29, 1957, from the hours of 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. at the Westinghouse Plant and at the National Malleable Plant in Sharon.

These plants are enclosed and guarded and the management stated that the public would not be permitted to take advantage of the scheduled registration.

The special registration was provided for by the Act of May 15, 1945, P. L. 466, sec. 1, 25 PS §951-16 which states, in part, that special registrations may be had at places “suitable and conveniently located”.

It is clear that the selection of sites for special registrations is a matter for the exercise of the discretion of the registration commission. It is also clear, however, that this court has the power to entertain an appeal and to grant relief where there has been a manifest abuse of discretion.

We recognize that the statute does not require that the registration be held in “public buildings”, such as school buildings or municipal buildings, and that it does not specifically say that the place chosen must be accessible to the general public. We hold, however, that the conduct of a special registration in a place not open to the public is an abuse of discretion.

The proposed special registrations are enjoined because a closed registration for a special group is in direct conflict with a well established democratic principle of an open polling place.

To condone such a selective restricted registration would set a precedent which would be inherently dangerous to our system of free elections. If we permitted a registration restricted to Westinghouse or Sharon Steel employes, we might soon find ourselves faced with a registration behind locked doors of a social or political club with admission open only to those of a particular sect, creed or color. The open registration *577forms the basis for an open election and any step taken to restrict either cannot be condoned by this court.

*Order*

And now, September 12, 1957, it is decreed that a permanent injunction issue enjoining defendants, Charles B. Lytle, Lawrence Wilheim and Arthur McCarthy, the Registration Commission of Mercer County, from holding special registrations at the Westinghouse Plant or the National Malleable Plant in Sharon, or at other similar registration places which are not accessible to the general public.

The costs of the proceedings shall be paid by the County of Mercer.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 101]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

Public Law 114-101
114th Congress

                                 An Act

[[Page 129 STAT. 2203]]

 
 To redesignate the Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, located in the 
State of Washington, as the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually National Wildlife 
Refuge, to establish the Medicine Creek Treaty National Memorial within 
     the wildlife refuge, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 18, 
                         2015 -  [H.R. 2270]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Billy Frank Jr. 
Tell Your Story Act. Native Americans. 16 USC 668dd note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Billy Frank Jr. Tell Your Story 
Act''.
SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF THE NISQUALLY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Redesignation.--The Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, located 
in the State of Washington, is redesignated as the ``Billy Frank Jr. 
Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge''.
    (b) <<NOTE: 16 USC 668dd note.>>  References.--Any reference in any 
statute, rule, regulation, Executive order, publication, map, paper, or 
other document of the United States to the Nisqually National Wildlife 
Refuge is deemed to refer to the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually National 
Wildlife Refuge.
SEC. 3. MEDICINE CREEK TREATY NATIONAL MEMORIAL, WASHINGTON.

    (a) <<NOTE: 54 USC 320301 note.>>  Establishment.--There is 
established the Medicine Creek Treaty National Memorial within the Billy 
Frank Jr. Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge to commemorate the location 
of the signing of the Medicine Creek Treaty of 1854 between the United 
States Government and leaders of the Muckleshoot, Nisqually, Puyallup, 
and Squaxin Island Indian Tribes.

    (b) Acreage and Administration.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
establish the boundaries of the Medicine Creek Treaty National Memorial 
and provide for administration and interpretation of the memorial by the 
United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
    (c) Coordination.--The Secretary of the Interior shall coordinate 
with representatives of the Muckleshoot, Nisqually, Puyallup,

[[Page 129 STAT. 2204]]

and Squaxin Island Indian Tribes in providing for the interpretation of 
the Medicine Creek Treaty National Memorial.

    Approved December 18, 2015.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2270:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114-355 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015):
            Nov. 30, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 14, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Consent of Deloitte & Touche



EXHIBIT 10.1 
 
Independent Auditors’ Consent 
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-12670, 333-12672, 333-98425 and 333-101452 of 02Micro International Limited on Form S-8 of our report dated
January 24, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of 02Micro International Limited for the year ended
December 31, 2002. 
 
/S/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE 
 
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands 
May 5, 2003
i /', ✓".: ; 

MANIVIV 

CERAMICS 

S I N C E 1 8 8 5 

April 18, 2013 

Alex Cristafaro, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

David Rostker, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy 

Cortney Higgins, U.S. Office of Management and Budget 

Dear Mr. Cristafaro, Mr. Rostker, and Ms. Higgins: 

My company is a small brick manufacturing company that has the potential to be significantly impacted by 

the upcoming MACT standard for major sources in the brick and structural clay processing industry. We are 

not a formal Small Entity Representative (SER) in the current review panel being conducted under the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA). We are also not members of the Brick Industry 

Association (BIA). However, all of our industry is working together with the BIA on this critical rulemaking 

and they are keeping us apprised of the activities on this rule. We consider them to be speaking on all 

industry's behalf as they work with you. 

Sincerely, 

Daniel Cabeza 

President 

Post Office Box 1134 0 Marion, South Carolina 29571 0(843) 423-1311 0 WATTS (800) 845-4010 0 FAX (843) 423-1515
§ 135.161 Communication and navigation equipment for aircraft operations under VFR over routes navigated by pilotage. ( a ) No person may operate an aircraft under VFR over routes that can be navigated by pilotage unless the aircraft is equipped with the two-way radio communication equipment necessary under normal operating conditions to fulfill the following: ( 1 ) Communicate with at least one appropriate station from any point on the route, except in remote locations and areas of mountainous terrain where geographical constraints make such communication impossible.
( 2 ) Communicate with appropriate air traffic control facilities from any point within Class B, Class C, or Class D airspace, or within a Class E surface area designated for an airport in which flights are intended; and
( 3 ) Receive meteorological information from any point en route, except in remote locations and areas of mountainous terrain where geographical constraints make such communication impossible.
( b ) No person may operate an aircraft at night under VFR over routes that can be navigated by pilotage unless that aircraft is equipped with— ( 1 ) Two-way radio communication equipment necessary under normal operating conditions to fulfill the functions specified in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) Navigation equipment suitable for the route to be flown.
[Doc. No. FAA-2002-14002, 72 FR 31684, June 7, 2007, as amended by Amdt. 135-116, 74 FR 20205, May 1, 2009]
#### § 151.99 Modifications of programming standards.

The Director, Airports, Service, or the Regional Director concerned may, on individual projects, when necessary for adaptation to meet local conditions, modify any standard set forth in or incorporated into this subpart, if he determines that the modification will provide an acceptable level of safety, economy, durability, or workmanship.

[Amdt. 151-13, 31 FR 11605, Sept. 2, 1966]
§ 15.1 Scope of regulations. ( a ) These regulations apply to claims asserted under the Federal Tort Claims Act, as amended, for money damages against the United States for injury to, or loss of property, or for personal injury or death, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of an employee of the FAA acting within the scope of office or employment. The regulations in this part supplement the Attorney General's regulations in 28 CFR part 14, as amended. The regulations in 28 CFR part 14, as amended, and the regulations in this part apply to consideration by the FAA of administrative claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
#### JACKSON v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 18, 1915.)

Appeal from Lamar Probate Court.

Heard before Hon. R. L. Bradley.

Walter Nesmith, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and W. H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

Reversed and remanded on authority of *Hazelton v. State, infra,*68 South. 715.
§ 25.699 Lift and drag device indicator. ( a ) There must be means to indicate to the pilots the position of each lift or drag device having a separate control in the cockpit to adjust its position. In addition, an indication of unsymmetrical operation or other malfunction in the lift or drag device systems must be provided when such indication is necessary to enable the pilots to prevent or counteract an unsafe flight or ground condition, considering the effects on flight characteristics and performance.
( b ) There must be means to indicate to the pilots the takeoff, en route, approach, and landing lift device positions.
( c ) If any extension of the lift and drag devices beyond the landing position is possible, the controls must be clearly marked to identify this range of extension.
[Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5675, Apr. 8, 1970]
#### § 1262.309 Judicial review.

Judicial review of final Agency decisions on awards may be sought under 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2), which provides: If a party other than the United States is dissatisfied with a determination of fees and other expenses made under [this part], that party may, within 30 days after the [final administrative] determination is made, appeal the determination to the court of the United States having jurisdiction to review the merits of the underlying decision of the agency adversary adjudication. The court's determination of any appeal heard under this [authority] shall be based solely on the factual record made before the agency. The court may modify the determination of fees and other expenses only if the court finds that the failure to make an award of fees and other expenses, or the calculation of the amount of the award, was unsupported by the substantial evidence.

[51 FR 15311, Apr. 23, 1986, as amended at 60 FR 12669, Mar. 8, 1995]
Date Employee Trip Vendor Expense Description Amt Act

10‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip JetBlue Airfare: BOS ‐ SJU 263

$ 

13‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip JetBlue Airfare: SJU ‐ BOS 210

$ 

10‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip ATR Limousine Transportation: car to airport in Boston 143

$ 

10‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip SSP America Meals: Breakfast Julia 24

$ 

11‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip Coffee Merchant Meals: Breakfast Julia 43

$ 

11‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip Los Cidrines Meals: Client Dinner 126

$ 

12‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip El Meson Meals: Client Lunch 54

$ 

12‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip Los Cidrines Meals: Julia Dinner 55

$ 

13‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip AC Hotels Hotel: Julia (3 nights) 992

$ 

13‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip Fresh Mart Meals: Julia Breakfast 4

$ 

13‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip Uber Transportation: car to airport in San Juan 12

$ 

13‐Apr Julia Frayer Apr‐23 San Juan, PR Trip ATR Limousine Transportation: car from airport in Boston 143

$ 

Total 2,073

$ 

Reimbursable Expenses

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24745-4 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 18:50:10 D

Exhibit D Page 1 of 1