AP-42 Section 

Reference AC 

Report Sect. 

Reference 95PO910 

~~~~SrArE

a_ 1_o17 

~2~cK 

coM ~An y 

-I-ES r pAiZ 6 -St ., t",S 

44TE.,PaVCM&A 5o /995 
9780 South 5200 West 

West Jordan, Utah 84088 

(801) 280-5200 

(800)233-8654 

FAX (801) 280-5220 

ri INTERSTATE [3RICK 

Date: 8/13/96 

Brian Shrager 

Environmental Engineer 

Midwest Research Institute 

Suite 350 

401 Harison Oaks Boulevard 

Cary, NC 27513-2412 

RE: Information you requested in your letter of July 18, 1996 (includes: this letter, summary sheet, 2 test 

reports)• 

Dear Mr. Shrager. 

Attached please find the information you requested. 

Interstate Brick has two scrubbers in operation. A Medium efficiency wet scrubber and a high efficiency wet 

scrubber. The medium efficiency scrubber is attached to a top fired, 48 wide, 16 high, natural gas fired tunnel kiln 

(kiln no. 4). The high efficiency wet scrubber is attached to a top fired, 36 wide, 14 high, top fired, natural gas 

fired tunnel kiln (kiln no. 3). Both scrubbers use a soda ash/water solution as the reagent. 

The medium efficiency scrubber consists of an rectangular, arched roofed, structure which looks similar to a 

greenhouse except that it is made of face brick. The gas follows a U-shaped path up one end and back down the 

other. A center separation wall in the middle and several baflle walls add residence time inside the scrubber. The 

gas is contacted by spray nozzels as it passes through the scrubber. The gasses then exit up an 80 ft. brick stack. 

The soda ash water solution is recirculated between the scrubber and a pond. Soda ash is added to the pond at a 

rate sufficient to hold pH 7. 

The high efficiency scrubber is a FRP (fiberglass reinforced plastic) packed tower type with a 7' diameter, 11' long, 

horizontal, co-current quench section lined with carbon brick attached to it. The gas travels horizontally through 

the quench and is cooled from approximately 480 down to 130 deg. F. The gas then flows upwards through a 12' 

diameter vessel filled with 5' of random dump packing, thorough a fixed blade chevron style demister. The vessal 

then reduces down to a 5 ft. diameter, 30 ft. high stack. The scrubber and stack resemble a coke bottle in shape 

with an approximate height of 60'. The bottom of the scrubber vessal holds a reservoir of reagent that is 

recirculated through the pacldng and quench section. A soda ash water solution is added to the reservoir to 

neutralize pH. 

Please do not use the test results for line 3 kiln inlet to scrubber done December 1994 because the flow rate was 

later found to have been in error. Please contact me if you have and further questions. 

Sincerely, 

~ 

John Hewitt, process engineer 

CLAY DIVISION 

H.C. MUDDOX: 4875 Bradshaw Road • Sacramento, CA 95827 •(800) 776-1244 • FAX (916) 362-9182 

INTERSTATE BRICK: 9780 South 5200 West • West Jordan, Utah 84088 •(800) 233-8654 • FAX (801) 280-5220 

GLADDING, McBEAN: 601 7th Street • P.O. Box 97 • Lincoln, CA 95648 9(800) 776-1133 • FAX (916) 645-1723 

a divislon of PACIFIC C0A5T 

building products 

3 
"EMISSIONS SURVEY FOR SOZ, NO x , CO, HF AND PM10 EMISSIONS CONDUCTED 

ON INTERSTATE BRICK COMPANY'S KILN NO. 3 SCRUBBER, 

LOCATED IN WEST JORDAN, UTAH" 

imr.~zarm 

V. Brent Benson 

J. Paul Benson 

Rick P. Hawkins 

Todd B. Benson 

Brian Briggs 

JD Schiller 

Brent Strong 

October 31, 1995 

November 30, 1995 

prepargd for;Mr. John Hewitt, Plant Manager 

Interstate Brick Company 

9780 South 5200 West 

West Jordan, Utah 84088-5689 

Preoared bv: Mr. V. Brent Benson, Technical Director 

American Environmental Testing, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

C~;L— 
Results of Stack Testing and percent sulfur and fluoride in clay mixes: 

Kiln no. 4 Tested December 1994 

inlet (lb/hr.) outlet (lb/hr.) efficiency 

PM10 not tested 8.75 n/a 

HF not tested 2.12 

S02 68.68 11.82 82.7% 

NOx 2.86 2.77 -.03% 

CO not tested not tested n/a 

Kiln no. 3 Tested November 1995 

inlet (lb/hr. ) outlet. (lb/hr. ) efficiency 

PM10 1.53 1.61 -0.05% 

HF 29.25 0.02 99.93% 

S02 25.8 0.07 99.72% 

NOx 10.5 2.76 73.70/o 

CO 36.14 32.22 n/a 

°r6 of °r6 sulfur in % flouride weighted weighted 

Mix production mix in mix % sulfur °r6 flouride 

A 23.3% 0.0575°i6 0.1309°r6 0.0041 % 0.0093°i6 

B 18.7% 0.0220% 0.0946% 0.0016% 0.0067% 

C 9.6% 0.0460% 0.0872% 0.0033% 0.0062% 

D 9.3°i6 0.1580°i6 0.0765°r6 0.0112°i6 0.0054°i6 

E 9.0% 0.1650°/b 0.1003% 0.0117°/6 0.0071 % 

F 8.3°i6 0.1560°i6 0.0916% 0.0111 °/6 0.0065% 

G 7.1 % 0.0889% 0.1000% 0.0063°r6 0.0071 % 

H 6.1 % 0.0780°/6 0.0684°r6 0.005596 0.0049% 

1 2.7% 0.1340°r6 0.1252°r6 0.0095°r6 0.0089% 

J 2.5% 0.0320% 0.1261 % 0.0023% 0.0090% 

K 1.3% 0.0390% 0.0985% 0.0028% 0.0070°r6 

L 0.9% 0.1450% 0.1113% 0.0103% 0.0079% 

M 0.7% 0.0320% 0.0682% 0.0023% 0.0048°r6 

N 0.6% 1 0.0660% 1 0.1 2N% 1 0.0047% 0.0086% 

weighted % sulfur and flouride in brick 0-0866% 0.0994% 

4-r/- 
~•L~~L• • - • • - 

AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING COMPANY, INC. (AET) certifies: 

1. That every effort was made to obtain accurate and representative data within the 

guidelines established by: 

A The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 

Title 40, Chapter I, Part 60, Appendix "A", Methods 1-5 inclusive, Method 

6C, Method 7E, Method 9, Method 10, Method 138 and Method 201A/202. 

B. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency "Quality Assurance Handbook for 

Air Pollution Measurement Systems". 

2. AII of sampling and analysis performed for the compliance test reported herein were 

carried out by myself or under my supervision. 

3. The results obtained are accurate and authentic. 

/2 ~lo '14 ~ Rick P. Hawkins 

Method 201 A Crew Supervisor CEM Crew Supervisor 

I have reviewed all testing details and methods on which the results of this test are based. I find 

them to be accurate within the limits of the applicable methods. 

V. Brent Benson 

Technical Director 

~ 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1 .0 Introduction 

1 .1 Test Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 

2.0 Summary of Results 

2.1 PM10Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 

2.1 .1 Table of PM1 QEmissions Summary 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

2.1 . 2 Table of PM1 0Emissions Summary 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet. . . . . . . . . . . 3 

2.2 S02Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

2. 2.1 S02 Emissions Summary Table 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

2. 2. 2 S02 Emissions Summary Table 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet. . . . . . . . . . . 4 

2. 3 NOxEmissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 

2. 3.1 NOxEmissions Summary Table 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . . . . . . . . . . 5 

2. 3. 2 NOx Emissions Summary Table 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet . . . . . . . . . . 5 

2.4 Visible Emissions Opacity . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

2.4.1 Summary Table of Visible Emissions 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

2.4.2 Summary Table of Visible Emissions 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet . . . . . . . . . . 6 

2.5 HF Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 

2.5.1 HF Emissions Summary Table 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . . . . . . . . . . . 7 

2.5.2 HF Emissions Summary Table 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet . . . . . . . . . . 7 

2.6 Visible Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 

2.6.1 Table of Visible Emissions Sum.mary 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet. . . . . . . . . . . 8 

3.0 Source Operation 

3 .1 General Plant Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 

I 
4.0 Sampling and Analysis Procedures 

4. 1 Emissions Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 

4.1 .1 Figure of Stack Diagram 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet Stack . . . . . . . . . 10 

4.1 .2 Table of Traverse Point Calculations 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . 

4.1 .3 Figure of Stack Diagram 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet Stack . . . . . . . . . 12 

4.1 .4 Tabie of Traverse Point Calculations 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet. . . . . . . . . . . 13 

4.1 . 5 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . . . . . . . . . . 14 

4.1 . 6 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet. . . . . . . . . . . 1 5 

4.1 .7 Summary Table of Calculated Results 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . . . . . . . . . . . 17 

4.1 .8 Summary Table of Calculated Results 

-Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Outlet . . . . . . . . . . .18 

4.1 . 9 Figure of EPA Method 201 A Sample Train . . . . .. 19 

4.1 .10 CEM Sample Train . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 

5.0 Quaiity Control/Quality Assurance 

5 .1 Compliance Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 

APPENDICES 

A. Approval Order F. Data-Logger Sheets 

B. AET Pretest Protocol G. AET CEM Readings 

C. Production Data H. VEO Readings 8 Certification Cards 

D. Field & Laboratory Data I. Calibration Data 

E. Emissions Calculations 

~ 
"EMISSIONS SURVEY FOR S02, NOx, CO, HF AND PM10 EMISSIONS CONDU.CTED 

ON INTERSTATE BRICK COMPANY'S KILN NO. 3 SCRUBBER, 

LOCATED IN WEST JORDAN, UTAH" 

1 .0 Introduction 

1.1Test Puroose 

At the request of Interstate Brick Company's, Mr. John Hewitt, American 

Environmental Testing, Inc., (AET) conducted a series of Emissions Testing for 

sulfur dioxide (S02), oxides of nitrogen (NO x), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrofluoric 

acid (HF) and PM 1 0 emissions at Interstate Brick Company's West Jordan Facility. 

These tests were accomplished October 31, 1995. The individual sources and the 

emissions that were quantified are listed below: 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber - Inlet S02, NOx, CO, HF & PM10 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber - Outlet S02, NOx, CO, HF & PM10 

On October 27, 1994, The Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) issued 

the Interstate Brick Company an "Approval Order" for their West Jordan Facility. A 

copy of the permit is attached as Appendix "A". In the permit, conditions were 

established for various pollutants emission levels and criteria were set for testing to 

verify compliance with these limitations. 

The UDEQ set the following emission limits in the Approval Order for the Kiln No. 3 

Scrubber: 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber PM 1 0 1.9 Ibs/hr 

(Outlet) S02 17.0 Ibs/hr 

NOx 1.8 Ibs/hr 

HF 1.5 Ibs/hr 

CO Emissions Testing is for Title V purposes only. There is no set emission 

limitation. 

Because of excessively high temperatures .in the Inlet of the No. 3 Scrubber and 

liquid droplets present in the gas stream of the Outlet of the No. 3 Scrubber at the 

sample port location. AET tested using EPA Method 5 and 202 to quantify particulate 

emissions (considering all particulate captured to be PM10) at both locations. 

Mr. Hewitt, requested that AET prepare a"Pretest Protocol" to submit to the UDEQ 

outlining the required tests. The protocol, without the calibration data is presented 

in Appendix "B". 

6% 

-1- 
AET performed Compliance Emissions Testing as set forth in the Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Chapter I, Part 60, Appendix "A". The following 

methods were used to conduct the emissions testing: 

Method 1 -" Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary 

Sources" 

Method 2 -" Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and 

Volumetric Flow Rate (type "S" pitot tube)" 

Method 3 -" Gas Analysis for Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen, Excess 

Air and Dry Molecular Weight" 

Method 4 -" Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases" 

Method 5 -"Determination of Particulate Emissions and Backhalf Condensables from Stationary Sources" 

Method 6C -" Determination of Sutfur Dioxide Emissions from 

Stationary Sources" (instrumental Analyzer 

Procedures) 

Method 7E -" Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from 

Stationary Sources" (Instrumental Analyzer 

Procedures) 

Method 10 -" Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions 

from Stationary Sources" (Instrumental Analyzer 

Procedures) 

Method 13B -" Determination of Hydrofluoric Acid from 

Stationary Sources" 

Method 202 -"Determination of Condensables Particulate 

Emissions from Stationary Sources" 

2.0Summary of Results 

2.1 p~i1IAEmissions(EPA 5/202) 

The emissions data accumulated for PM 10emissions during the October 31, 1995 

Compliance Testing is summarized in Table 2.1.1 for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

and Table 2.1.2 for the Scrubber Outlet. 

- 2- 1 
(PM 10Emissions Summary) 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

Test 

Run 

DSCF 

Collected 

Emissions Rates 

I b s/ h r gr/dscf 

1 

2 

3 

40.3740 

38.1693 

37.2603 

1.5714 

1.5581 

1.4645 

0.0097 

0.0099 

0.0094 

Average = 38.6012 1.5313 0.0097 

Table 2.1.2 

(PM 1 0 Emissions Summary) 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet 

Test 

Run 

DSCF 

Collected 

Emissions Rates 

I b s/ h r gr/dscf 

1 

2 

3 

49.2786 

45.2297 

45.0035 

1.5803 

1.7841 

1.4663 

0.0103 

0.0125 

0.0102 

Average = 45.5039 1.6102 0.0110 

The average PM 1 0 emission of 1.6 Ibs/hr is 84.21% of the allowable ceiling level 

of 1.9 Ibs/hr. 
2.2 ~Q2Emissions(EPA 6C) 

The emissions data accumulated for S02 emissions during the October 31, 1995 

Compliance Testing is summarized in Table 2.2.1 for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

and Table 2.2.2 for the Scrubber Outlet. 

(S02 Emissions Summary) 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

ppm Ibs/hr 

1 

2 

3 

125.63 

147.92 

148.33 

23.628 

27.036 

26.731 

Average = 140.63 25.799 

Table 2.2.2 

(S02 Emissions Summary) 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet 

Test 

Run 

Emis i ns Rates 

ppm Ibs/h r 

1 

2 

3 

0.45 

0.34 

0.34 

0.080 

0.057 

0.057 

Average = 0.38 0.065 

The average measured S02 emission concentration for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet 

was 0.065 Ibs/hr, which is 0.38% of the UDEO permitted allowable ceiling of 17.0 

Ibs/hr. 

-4- 
2.3 NO,, Emissions (EPA 7E) 

The emissions data accumulated for NO X emissions during the October 31, 1995 

Compliance Testing is summarized in Table 2.3.1 for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

and Table 2.3.2 for the Scrubber Outlet. 

Table 2.3.1 

(NOX Emissions Summary) 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

ppm Ibs/hr 

1 

2 

3 

79.07 

77.52 

82.06 

10.697 

10.191 

10.637 

Average = 79.55 10.508 

Table 2.3.2 

(NOX Emissions Summary) 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet 

Test 

Run 

Emis ions Rates 

ppm Ibs/hr 

1 

2 

3 

23.40 

19.54 

24.58 

3.00 

2.34 

2.95 

F

;rage = 22.51 2.76 

The average measured NO Xemission concentration for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet 

was 2.76 Ibs/hr, which is 153.33% of the UDEO permitted allowable ceiling of 1.8 

Ibs/hr 

-5- ~~ 
2.4CO Emissions(EPA 10) 

The emissions data accumulated for CO emissions during the October 31, 1995 

Compliance Testing is summarized in Table 2.4.1 for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

and Table 2.4.2 for the Scrubber Outlet. 

Table 2.4.1 

(CO Emissions Summary) 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

ppm Ibs/h r 

1 

2 

3 

455.62 

445.38 

444.65 

37.581 

35.700 

35.142 

Average = 448.55 36.141 

Table 2.4.2 

(CO Emissions Summary) 

. i . 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

ppm Ibs/h r 

1 

2 

3 

461.14 

409.35 

420.32 

36.045 

29.884 

30.735 

Ferage = 430.27 32.221 

There were no limitations set for CO Emissions by the UDEO. Testing was for Title V 

purposes only. 

-6- 13 
2.5HF Emissions(EPA 13B) 

The emissions data accumulated for HF emissions during the October 31, 1995 

Compliance Testing is summarized in Table 2.5.1 for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

and Table 2.5.2 for the Scrubber Outlet. 

Table 2.5.1 

(HF Emissions Summary) 

. X- .. 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

mg/dscf I b s/ h r 

1 

2 

3 

7.999 

11.414 

14.422 

25.51 

 27.71 

34.52 

Average = 11.278 29.25 

(HF Emissions Summary) 

Z41GMU7-WW-MM--1-MW*M i M i 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

mg/dscf I b s/ h r 

1 

2 

3 

0.00834 

0.00720 

0.00673 

0.0198 

0.0160 

0.0149 

Average = 0.00742 0.0169 

The average measured HF emission concentration for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet 

was 0.0169 Ibs/hr, which is 1.13% of the UDEO permitted allowable ceiling of 1.5 

Ibs/hr. 

-7- 14 
W--ZLYM • - • • 4.. ► • 

VEO's were taken simultaneously with each of the EPA Method 5/202 runs for the 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet. Averages for the three (3) runs are given in Table 

2.6.1. 

Table 2.6.1 

(Visible Emissions Opacity Summary) 

Test 

Run No. 

%VEO 

1 1.46 

2 1.25 

3 1.67 

Average = 1.45 

The average VEO reading of 1.45% for theKiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet was 7.25% of 

the allowable ADEO ceiling level of <_ 20%. 

I . - • . .1 

3.1General Plant Operations 

The manufacture of brick and related products such as clay pipe, pottery and some 

types of refractory brick involves the mining, grinding, screening and blending of 

the raw materials, and the forming, cutting or shaping, drying or curing, and firing 

of the final product. 

Surface clays and shales are mined in open pits. Most fine clays are found 

underground. After mining, the material is crushed to remove stones and is stirred 

before it passes onto screens for segregation by particle size. 

To start the forming process, clay is mixed with water, usually in a pug mill. The 

three principal processes for forming brick are stiff mud, soft mud and dry press. 

In the stiff mud process, sufficient water is added to give the clay plasticity, and 

bricks are formed by forcing the clay through a die. Wire is used in separating 

bricks. AII structural tile and most and most brick are formed by this process. The 

soft mud process is usually used with clay too wet for the stiff mud process. The clay 

is mixed with water to a moisture content of 20 to 30 percent, and the bricks are 

formed in molds. In the dry press process, clay is mixed with a small amount of 

water and formed in steel molds by applying pressure of 500 to 1500 pounds per 

square inch. 

-8- 
Wet clay units that have been formed are almost completely dried before firing, 

usually with waste heat from kilns. Many types of kilns are used for firing brick, 

but the most common are the downdraft periodic kiln and the tunnel kiln. The 

periodic kiln is a permanent brick structure with a number of fireholes where fuel 

enters the furnace. Hot gases from the fuel are drawn up over the bricks, down 

through then by underground flues, and out of the oven to the chimney. Although 

lower heat recovery makes this type less efficient than the tunnel kiln, the uniform 

temperature distribution leads to a good quality product. 

Production Data during the testing period was given to AET by Interstate Brick 

Company and is attached as Appendix "C". 

4. 0 Sampling and Analysis Procedures 

u • ~ t• 

A EPA Method 1; sample and velocity traverses for stationary sources. 

Figure 4.1.1 is a diagram of the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet Stack. This reference 

method requires the tester, due to stack geometry, to sample for particulate and 

velocity at twenty (20) separate locations in the stack, five (5) per. traverse, in 

four (4) separate ports. . The location of these points relative to the stack are 

given in Table 4.1.2. 

Figure 4.1.3 is a diagram of the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet Stack. The reference 

methods require the tester, due to the stack geometry, to sample for particulate 

and velocity at twenty-four (24) separate locations in the stack, twelve (12) 

per traverse, on diameter lines 90 0apart from one another. The location of these 

points relative to the stack are given in Table 4.1.4. 

B. EPA Method 3; for gas analysis of carbon dioxide, oxygen, excess air, and dry 

molecular weight. 

This reference method requires that a gas sample be extracted from the stack for 

analysis concurrently with each of the runs. The integrated gas sample is then 

analyzed via an orsat for carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and oxygen. The 

nitrogen value is obtained by difference. 

Results from these determinations are included in Appendix "D" with the field and 

laboratory data forms for each individual source. 

C. EPA Method 2, 5 8 202 Combined; for the determination of velocity, particulate 

matter, PM 10em issions/back- half condensables and volumetric flow rate from 

stationary sources. 

To evaluate compliance with the PM 10limitation specified in the "Approval 

Order", AET had to test using methodology consistent with the above referenced 

methods. Data from the three (3) separate runs, which constitute a singte 

compliance test, are summarized in Table 4.1.5 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet 

and Table 4.1.6 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet. 

-9- 11 
Interstate Brick Company's Kiln No. 3 

Scrubber Inlet Stack Diagram 

Figure 4.1.1 

~ 

L 

A= 251 "= 5.23 Diameters B= 120" = 2.5 Diameters 
5 10 15 20 

. . . . 

4 9 14 19 

■ . . . 

3 S 13 18 

. . . . 

2 7 12 17 

. . . . 

1 6 11 16 

. . . . 

mi 

9.6° 

4.8" 

Interstate Brick Company's Kiln No. 3 

Scrubber Inlet Traverse Point Locations 

Table 4.1.2 

48" 

~ 16 66 k6 

Sample Ports are 15" Long 

Sample Poi nt Distance from outside of Port 

1, 6, 1 1, 16 19.8" = 19 3!4" 

2, 7, 12,17 29.4" = 29 3!8" 

3, 8, 13, 18 39.0" = 39" 

4, 9, 14, 19 48.6" = 48 5/8" 

5, 10, 15,20 58.2" = 58 1 /4" 

_11_ /f~ 
98.0" - 1.63 Diamters 

264.0" . 4.4 Diamters 

Interstate Brick Company's Kiln No. 3 

Scrubber Outlet Stack Diagram 

Figure 4.1.3 

~--- 60.0" I.D. —~ 

-12- 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

Table 4.1.4 

TRAVERSE POINT CALCULATIONS 

- •,~ •__. 

.~~ . . . . i . ~ :S ~ ••:- ~ 

~ ._. .. .:. 

. . ti._ . 

.. i • -. ~ - 1 . ~ 

Traverse Percent of Stack I.D. Product of Distance Traverse Point 

Point Stack I.D. inches col. 2&3 Y Location from 

Number (to 1/8 in) outside of ports 

(sum of columns 

4 & 5) 

1& 13 2.1 60 1.26 6.0" 7.26 = 7 1/4" 

2& 14 6.7 60 4.02 6.0" 10.02 = 10.0" 

3& 15 11.8 60 7.08 6.0" 13.08 = 13 1/8" 

4& 16 17.7 60 10.62 6.0" 16.62 = 16 5/8" 

5& 17 25 60 15 6.0" 21.0 = 21.0" 

6& 18 35.6 60 21.36 6.0" 27.36 = 27 3/8" 

7& 19 64.4 60 38.64 6.0" 44.64 = 44 5/8" 

8& 20 75 60 45 6.0" 51.0" 

9& 21 82.3 60 49.38 6.0" 55.38 = 55 3/8" 

10 & 22 88.2 60 52.92 6.0" 58.92 = 58 7/8" 

11 & 23 93.3 60 55.98 6.0" 61.98 = 62.0" 

12 & 24 97.9 60 58.74 6.0" 64.74 = 64 3/4" 

-13- ~ 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.5 

(FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY) 

Plant: Interstate Brick 

Source: Kiln #3 - Outlet 

~Qe: EPA Method #5 

Date: 10/31 /95 

Symbol Description Units Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 

Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 55.205 51.271 51.068 

sampied @ meter Iso 59.069 54.860 54.643 

conditions 

Pb Barometric Pre: "Hg abs 25.42 25.35 25.32 

AH Average Pres "H20 1.8226 1.7546 1.7473 

drop across the 

orifice meter 

Tm Average gas °R 540.33 545.15 545.06 

meter temp °F 80.33 85.15 85.06 

Yi Meter Coefficient 1.07 1.07 1.07 

Vw Total H20 ml 168.6 201.7 195.4 

collected, impingers 

& silica gel 

CO2 % 5.1 5.1 4.9 

02 % 14.9 14.5 14.9 

N2 + CO % 80 80.4 80.2 

Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.368 0.368 0.368 

Ts Stack Temp °R 597.96 595.25 595.42 

°F 137.96 135.25 135.42 

Sqr rt OP Velocity head "H20 0.3459 0.3338 0.3333 

of stack gas 

Cp Pitot Tube 0.8654 0.8654 0.8654 

Coefficient 

Ps Static Pres "H20 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 

Pabs Absolute Pres "Hg 25.38 25.31 25.28 

As Area stack Ft2 19.635 19.635 19:635 

Stack in inches 60 60 60 

Tt Net time min. 72 72 72 

of test 

Mgp Mn Total 32.9 36.5 29.8 

~7 

-14- 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.6 

(FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY) 

Plant: Interstate Brick 

Source: Kiln #3 - Inlet 

Tvne: EPA Method #5 

Date: 10/31 /95 

5ymbo) Description Units Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 

Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 49.53 46.99 46.323 

sampled @ meter Iso 48.787 46.285 45.628 

conditions 

Pb Barometric Pre: "Hg abs 25.41 25.34 25.3 

AH Average Pres "H20 1.5734 1.3724 1.3571 

drop across the 

orifice meter 

Tm Averrage gas °R 544.1 544.2 548.68 

meter temp °F 84.1 84.2 88.68 

Yi Meter Coefficient 0.985 0.985 0.985 

Vw Total H20 ml 62.5 60.7 63.4 

collected, impingers 

& silica gel 

CO2 % 3.5 3.7 3.4 

02 % 14.6 14.3 14.9 

N2 + CO % 81.9 82 81.7 

Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.312 0.312 0.312 

Ts Stack Temp °R 1006.15 993.45 1004.65 

°F 546.15 533.45 544.65 

Sqr rt AP Veloaty head "H20 0.5395 0.5226 0.5205 

of stack gas 

Cp Pitot Tube 0.8696 0.8696 0.8696 

Coefficient 

Ps Static Pres "H20 -0.18 -0.18 -0.18 

Pabs Absolute Pres "Hg 25.40 25.33 25.29 

As Area stack Ft2 15.999 15.999 15.999 

Stack in inches 54.16 54.16 54.16 

Tt Net time min. 60 60 60 

of test 

Mgp Mn Total 25.4 24.5 22.8 

-15- 6~49-- 
The original laboratory and field data accumulated at the test site are presented 

in Appendix "D". Orsat and laboratory weight forms are hand written on site as 

the data is generated. 

Particulate (PM 10 ) and velocity measurements, required in the applicable 

reference methods, are generated in the field by computer. These forms are also 

included in Appendix "D" for each of the three (3) runs that comprise a 

compliance test. Compliance criteria is calculated using computer and handwritten field forms and are summarized in Table 4.1.7 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 3 

Inlet and Table 4.1.8 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet. 

A copy of the example calculations are attached as Appendix "E". 

Figure 4.1.9 is a schematic of the sample train used to obtain the field data. A 

stainless steel probe liner was used for the testing. The glass fiber filters used 

in the train are 99.95% efficient on 0.3 micron particles and have no organic 

binders (Andersen P-3710). These filters are tared before use and after the test 

to determine particulate loading. Filter weights and particulate in the acetone 

washes of the glassware and probe ahead of the filter constitute the total 

particulate catch. The probe and filter are kept at 248°F ± 25 11during sampling. 

Moisture in the stack gases is collected by keeping the impingers in the sample 

train below 68°F with an ice bath. The "back-half" of the moisture sampling 

train contained the following impingers: 

Impinger 

Number Contents Amount Parameter Collected 

1 Deionized Water 100 ml Moisture 

2 Deionized Water 100 ml Moisture 

3 Empty - - - - - - - Moisture 

4 Silica Gel @200 g Mo.isture 

Prior to doing the EPA Method 5/202 tests, AET ran a pretest cyclonic flow 

determination in the exhaust stacks per EPA Method 2 criteria. Sources are 

testable if the average flow rate varies less than 20 0from parallel to the vertical 

stack. The average Angle (°) was found to be 1.91 0for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber 

Outlet. The Field Form for cyclonic flow is included in Appendix "D" with the 

Field and Laboratory Data. 

On all tests for PM 10 Emissions, the sampling train was leak-checked at the 

nozzle at 15 inches of vacuum (Hg), and the reading recorded on the computer 

forms. This was done to predetermine the possibility of a diluted sample. After 

each test is complete AET conducts a final leak check to insure sample integrity. 

Those values are also included in the computer printouts. Before and after each 

test, the pitot tube lines were checked for leaks under both a vacuum and 

pressure. The lines were also checked for clearance and the manometer was 

zeroed before each test. These leak checks are shown on the computer forms for 

each run in Appendix "D". 

D. EPA Method 6C, 7E and 10; for S0 2 , NOx and CO emissions from stationary 

sources (Instrumental Analysis Procedures) 

-16- a3 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

- .565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.7 

(CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA) 

Plant: Interstate Brick 

Source: Kiln #3 - Intlet 

Twe: EPA Method #5 

Date: 10/31 /95 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 

Vm std Volume dry gas dscfin 0.6729 0.6362 0.6210 

sampled @ standard dscf 40.374 38.1693 37.2603 

Conditions 

Vw gas Volume water scf 2.9419 2.8571 2.9842 

vapor collected C 

standard conditions 

Bws Proportion by 0.0679 0.0696 0.0742 

volume of water 

vapor in gas stream 

dimensioniess 

Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 29.144 29.164 29.14 

weight 

Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.3871 28.3865 28.3139 

weight 

Vs Stack gas ft/sec 47.3805 45.6738 45.8357 

velocity 

Qs Volumetric flow ft3/hr 1.133 1.1011 1.0856 

rate dry basis x E+6 x E+6 x E+6 

standard conditions 

Iso Isoldnetic % 107.424 104.5039 103.4652 

variation 

Cs Conc. Particulat, Ib/scf 6.2912 6.4188 6.1191 

matter in stack x E-4 x E-4 x E-4 

gas dry basis 

Emr Emission rate * Ibs/dscf 1.3869 1.4151 1.349 

x E -6 x E -6 x E -6 

gr/dscf 0.0097 0.0099 0.0094 

Ibs/hr 1.5714 1.5581 1.4645 

NOx Ibs/hr 10.07 10.191 10.637 

CO Ibs/hr 37.581 35.7 35.142 

S02 Ibs/hr 23.628 27.036 26.731 

HF Ibs/hr 25.51 27.71 34.52 

/ 

-17- C* 
~ 

, 

AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.8 

(CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA) 

Plant: Interstate Brick 

Source: Kiln #3 - Outlet 

Tvoe: EPA Method #5 

Date: 10/31 /95 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 

Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.6844 0.6282 0.6250 

sampled @ standard dscf 49.2786 45.2297 45.0035 

Conditions 

Vw gas Volume water scf 7.936 9.494 9.1975 

vapor collected @ 

standard conditions 

Bws Proportion by 0.1387 0.1735 0.1697 

volume of water 

vapor in gas stream 

dimensionless 

Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 29.412 29.396 29.38 

weight 

Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 27.8291 27.4189 27.4489 

weight 

Vs Stack gas ft/sec 23.5423 22.8724 22.8384 

velocity 

Qs Volumetric flow ft3/hr 1.0737 1.0028 1.0044 

rate dry basis x E+6 x E+6 x E-+6 

standard conditions 

Iso Isokinetic % 101.7164 99.9607 99.2984 

variation 

Cs Conc. Particulat. Ib/scf 6.6763 8.0699 6.6217 

matter in stack x E-4 x E-4 x E-4 

gas dry basis 

Errr Emission rate * Ibs/dscf 1.4719 1.7791 1.4598 

x E -6 x E -6 x E -6 

gr/dscf 0.0103 0.0125 0.0102 

Ibs/hr 1.5803 1.7841 1.4663 

NOx Ibs/hr 3 2.34 2.948 

CO Ibs/hr 36.045 29.884' 30.735 

S02 Ibs/hr 0.08 0.057 0.057 

HF Ibs/hr 0.0198 0.016 0.0149 
d 

W 

~ 4 

c W 

F-- 

4 

W 

2 

W 

} ~ W 

7 O W = 

CJ? ~ 

W ~ ~ ~ 

LLI wiL H 

0 LLI 

W O 

W IJy 

~

~ 

~ 

d 

M W 

CL 

x W 

H 

a-j ~ 

U} ~ 

~ 

W fW 

~ m O OC 

~ ~ ~ 

W W 

f ~ W 

H 

Ca -CC 

4 C~ 

~ 

W 

~ 

J 

-cc 

> 

r~ 4 

a 

a 

~ H 

2 

0 

Ig/ ~ 

( ~9 4 

cr W 

F~- 

W 

~ 

CA -CC 

C) 

~ 

2 

~ 

~ 

W ? 

J 4 }~ 

CA 

CA C 

IOL 1 

m 

O 

lx c W 

CD 

z 

a~~ J 

0~ W 

F- W 

O 

a cc 

~ 

H O 

H 

IL 

LL. 

a 

W z_ 

W J 

z ~ 

LLI

J 2 

~ 2 

~ } ~ 

~ 

~ W 

W ~ 

o~ 

~ W i 

2 

H 

~ • a 

~ Q .` ` 

LLI _ 

lx H 

~ LLI • 

O ~ oa 

ix W 

2 

H ~ 

O! 

T 

~ 

d L 

~ 

LL. 

C 

E- 

_d 

CL 

(a (j) 

LO 

C 

s cW 

6 

Q 

a 

W 

-19- ► ~ 
The sample train used to extract and condition the stack gases for S02, NO xand CO 

analysis is shown in Figure 4.1.10. S02 concentration is measured using a TECO 

40A S02 analyzer. A TECO 10A NO xanalyzer is used to determine the 

concentration of NO xand CO emissions were determined by using a TECO Model 48 

Gas Filter Correlation (GFC) CO Analyzer. Three each 30 minute tests were run 

for S02, NOxand CO emissions. Individual data-logger sheets for each run are 

included in Appendix "F". AET's CEM readings taken every minute for 30 minutes 

are included in Appendix "G". 

E EPA Method 9; for visible emissions opacity. 

During each of the EPA Method 5/202 runs on the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet, 

AET had a certified VEO reader compile VEO's every fifteen (15) seconds for six 

(6.0) minutes. 

Field VEO forms and the readers current certification cards are included as 

Appendix "H". 

F. EPA Method 13B for the determination of hydrofluoric acid (HF) emissions from 

stationary sources as specified in Federal and State regulations. 

Particulate and gaseous hydrofluoric acid are extracted from the stack 

isokinetically using a modified EPA Method 5 sample train. Total fluoride is 

determined on the filter, probe and prefilter glassware and in the back-half 

impinger water using a specific ion electrode. 

5.0 Quality Control/Ouality Assurance 

• • i• 

Specific items used in the EPA approved sample trains require pretest and post-test 

calibrations. The frequency of the calibrations and guidelines for procedural items 

are delineated in the EPA's "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution 

Measurement Systems". 

For EPA Methods 1-5/202, 6C, 7E, 10 and 13B, the quality assurance guidelines 

are intended to insure that the S02, NO x, CO, HF and PM 10emissions are quantified 

in a manner consistent with the most stringent sampling criteria possible. AET 

testing personnel are thoroughly trained in all aspects of the EPA required QA/oC 

guidelines. The crew supervisor has certified at the front of this report that the test 

crew adhered to those guidelines in the regulations applicable to the compliance 

testing at Interstate Brick Company's West Jordan, Facility. There were no 

deviations from prescribed methodology reported by the supervisor. 

Calibrations for the sample nozzle, pitot tube, thermocouples, orifice, filter balance 

and dry gas meter used to extract the sample at an constant sampling rate are attached 

as Appendix "I" 

-20- rt-7 
CEM Sample Train 

Figure 4.1.10 

Continuous Emissions Analyzers 

Ca1i bration Gases 

-21- 

~ 
The main quality criteria that AET is required to fulfill for the EPA 51202 emissions 

testing is as follows: 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

1. Isokinetic Sampling Rate = 100 ± 10.0% 

AET Run Number Sampling Rate 

1 107.43 

2 104.50 

3 103.47 

Average = 105.13 

2. Sampling Volume => 31.8 DSCF 

AET Run Number Sample Volume (DSCF) 

1 40.37 

2 38.17 

3 37.26 

Average = 38.60 

AII of the compliance test quality assurance criteria was achieved for this set of 

tests. 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet 

1. Isokinetic Sampfing Rate = 100 ± 10.0% 

AET Run Number Sampling Rate 

1 101.72 

2 99.96 

3 99.30 

Average = 

2. Sampling Volume => 31.8 DSCF 

AET Run Number 

~ 

~ 

Average = 

100.33 

Sample Volume (DSCF) 

49.28 

'45.23 

45.00 

46.50 

-22- ~ ` 
AII of the compliance test quality assurance criteria was achieved for this set of 

tests. - 

The CEM sample train was also leak checked prior to testing the Enterprise Engines. 

The standards used for these tests conformed to EPA "Protocol 1" quality. Those 

certifications are included in Appendix "I". 

The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Method 6C requires that the following 

items are met: 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide in nitrogen in the 

following ranges for the span value of 0 to 100 ppm: 

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). 

AET had a zero gas of purified N 2that was < 0.1 ppm S02. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 

40 to 60 percent of the span value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 54.5 ppm, which was in the acceptable 

range. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 

80 to 100 percent of the span value. 

AET's high-level calibration gas was 88.4 which was in the acceptable range. 

The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "I" 

2. Measurement System Performance Specifications 

During the S02 tests AET's measurement system is required to meet the following 

criteria: 

a. Zero drift for each run should be <_ 3.0% of the span value. 

Run No. 1 - 0.06 

Run No. 2 - 0.13 

Run No. 3 - 0.03 

b. Calibration drift should be <_ 3.0% of the span value. 

Zero Gas - 0.10 

Mid-Level Gas - 0.20 

High-Level Gas - 0.03 

-23- s(J 
c. Calibration bias error for each run should be 5 5.0% of the calibration gas 

value. ' 

Run No. 1 - -0.95 

Run No. 2 - -1 .11 

Run No. 3 - - 0. 9 3 

AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are included in Appendix 

1f 1 " . 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide in nitrogen in the 

following ranges for the span value of 0 to 100 ppm: 

a Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). 

AET had a zero gas of purified N2that was < 0.1 ppm S02. 

b. Mid-level. calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 

40 to 60 percent of the span value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 54.5 ppm, which was in the acceptable 

range. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 

80 to 100 percent of the span value. 

AET's high-level calibration gas was 88.4 which was in the acceptable range. 

The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "I". 

2. Measurement System Performance Specifications 

During the S02 tests AET's measurement system is required to meet the following 

criteria: 

a Zero drift for each run should be < 3.0% of the span value. 

Run No. 1 - 0.10 

Run No. 2 - 0.10 

Run No. 3 - 0.20 

b. Calibration drift should be <_ 3.0% of the span value. 

Zero Gas - 0.10 

Mid-Level Gas - 0.60 

High-Level Gas - 0.20 

') A 3I 
c. Calibration bias error for each run should be <_ 5.0% of the calibration gas 

value. . 

Run No. 1 - 0.20 

Run No. 2 - -0.30 

Run No. 3 - 0.10 

AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are included in Appendix 

"1". 

The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Method 7E requires that the following 

items are met: 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide in nitrogen in the 

following ranges for the span value of 0 to 1000 ppm: 

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NOx). 

AET had a zero gas of purified N 2that was < 0.1 ppm NOx. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 

40 to 60 percent of the span value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 525.5 ppm, which was in the acceptable 

range. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 

80 to 100 percent of the span value. 

AET's high-level calibration gas was 899.5 which was in the acceptable 

range. 

The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "I". 

2. Measurement System Performance Specifications 

During the NOx tests AET's measurement system is required to meet the following 

criteria: 

a Zero drift for each run should be <_ 3.0% of the span value. 

Run No. 1 - 0.04 

Run No. 2 - 0.02 

Run No. 3 - 0.01 

b. Calibration drift should be <_ 3.0% of the span value. 

Zero Gas - 0.00 

Mid-Level Gas - 1.00 

High-Level Gas - 0.06 

-2S- ~ -4-- 
c. Calibration bias error for each run should be <_ 5.0% of the calibration gas 

vaEue. 

Run No. 1 - -1 . 04 

Run No. 2 - -1 . 2 3 

Run No. 3 - -1 . 4 8 

AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are included in Appendix 

" I " . 

- rt , • • • ' ~~~ 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide in nitrogen in the 

following ranges for the span value of 0 to 100 ppm: 

a Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NOx). 

AET had a zero gas of purified N 2that was < 0.1 ppm NOx. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 

40 to 60 percent of the span value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 53.4 ppm, which was in the acceptable 

range. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 

80 to 100 percent of the span value. 

AET's high-level calibration gas was 87.3 which was in the acceptable range. 

The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "I". 

2. Measurement System Performance Specifications 

During the NOx tests AET's measurement system is required to meet the following 

criteria: 

a Zero drift for each run should be <_ 3.0% of the span value. 

Run No. 1 - 0.30 

Run No. 2 - 0.50 

Run No. 3 - 0.60 

b. Calibration drift should be 5 3.0% of the span value. 

Zero Gas - 0.20 

Mid-Level Gas - 0.20 

High-Level Gas - 0.10 

-26- ~3 
c. Calibration bias error for each run should be <_ 5.0% of the calibration gas 

value. 

Run No. 1 - 0.50 

Run No. 2 - 0.50 

Run No. 3 - 0.40 

AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are included in Appendix 

N I11 - 

The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Method 10 testing requires that the 

following items are met: 

Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of carbon monoxide (CO) in nitrogen in 

the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 1000 ppm. 

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm CO). 

AET used a zero gas of purified N2 that is <0.1 ppm CO. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to 

approximately 30 percent of the span value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 324.0. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to 

approximately 60 percent of the span value. 

AET's high-level calibration gases was 646.8 ppm. 

a Zero drift for each run should be <_ 3.0% of the span value; they were as 

follows: 

Run No. 1 - 0.07 

Run No. 2 - 0.04 

Run No. 3 - 0.04 

b. Calibration drift for each test should be <_ 3.0% of the span value; they were 

as follows: 

Zero Gas - 0.00 

Mid-Level Gas - 0.21 

High-Level Gas - 0.05 

-27- v ` 
c. Calibration bias error for each run shouid be 5 5.0% of the calibration gas 

value; they were as follows: 

Run No. 1 - 0.27 

Run No. 2 - - 0. 2 0 

Run No. 3 - -1 . 43 

AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are included in Appendix 

"I". 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of carbon monoxide (CO) in nitrogen in 

the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 1000 ppm. 

a Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm CO). 

AET used a zero gas of purified N2 that is <0.1 ppm CO. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to 

approximately 30 percent of the span value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 324.0. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to 

approximately 60 percent of the span value. 

AET's high-level calibration gases was 646.8 ppm. 

a Zero drift for each run should be 5 3.0% of the span value; they were as 

follows: 

Run No. 1 - 0.09 

Run No. 2 - 0.00 

Run No. 3 - 0.00 

b. Calibration drift for each test should be <_ 3:0% of the span value; they were 

as foilows: 

Zero Gas - 0.01 

Mid-Level Gas - 0.03 

High-Level Gas - 0.09 

c. Calibration bias error for each run should be 5 5.0% of the calibration gas 

value; they were as follows: 

Run No. 1 = 0.49. 

Run No. 2 - 0.05 

Run No. 3 - 0.09 

AET met these conditions for the tests. These results are inctuded in Appendix 

"1". 

~ 
Appendix "A" 

(Approval Order) 

agmFtican Envizonmzntaf 9ssti.n9 Com#any gnc. 

GReno, cNavada nGtnr.z, G4tizona cSaCt -falt eity, Q ~ta4 

702-786-8553 6o2-253-3354 8o,-266-7m 

<36 
Appendix "A" 

(Approval Order) 

~~ 
STATE OF UTAH 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Division of Air Quality 

INTENT TO APPROVE TUNNEL KILN #4 

Prepared By: Nando Nleli, Engineer 

1 ~I ~ 

• . . . 

~ ~ i: ~4' 

DAQE-947-94 

Date: October 27, 1994 

Source 

INTERSTATE BRICK COMPANY 

Russell A. Roberts 

Executive Secretary 

Utah Air Quality Board 

m 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 2 

Abstrad 

Interstate Brick is required by the P*1SIP to reduce S01emissions to meet Reasonable Available 

Control Technology (RACI). The Approval Order contains new emission limitations which have been 

determined to meet RACT. Interstate Brick has also proposed an increase in fluoride emissions for Kiln 

#4, the only kiln which had aJluoride emission lbnit. Modeling of overall fluoride eniissions has been 

performed which demonstrates compllance with the threshold limit values set for , fluoride. 

CorrespoRding emissfon liniits for fluoride from each kiln are contained in the Approval Order. 

Previously unfdentified emfssions from ezisting baghouses, which have been determined .to meEt Best 

Avaiiable Control Technology (BACT) requirements, are contained in the Approval Order with 

assoeiated emission/operating liraitations. 

The Notice of Intent for the above-referenced project has been evaluated and has been found to be 

consistent with the requirements of the Utah Air Conservation Rules (UACR) and the Utah Air 

Conservation Act. However, air pollution producing sources and%or their air control facilides may not 

be constructed, installed, established, or modified prior to the issuance of an Approval Order (AO) by 

the Executive Secretary of the Utah Air Quality Board. 

The Division of Air Quality has determined that a pubiic comment period is not required for your 

particular project referenced above. Unless you have comments which would require changes, the AO 

for this project will be based upon the following condicions: 

General Conditions: 

1. This AO appiies to the following company: 

Interstate Brick 

9780 South 5200 West 

West Jordan, Utah 84084 

The equipment listed below in this AO shall be operated at the following location: 

PLANT LOC.4TION: 

Universal Transverse Mercator (UTI) Coordinate System: 4,491.5 km North, 413.5 km 

East 

2. Definitions of terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used 

in the UACR, Utah Administrative Codes (UAC), and Series 40 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (40 CFR). These definitions take precedence unless specifically defined 

otherwise herein. 

3. Interstate Brick shall operate the brick manufacturing facility according to the information 

submitted in the Notices of Intent dated November 30, 1992, December 1993, June 7, 

1994, and additional information dated September 22, 1994, and according to 

requirements listed in this AO. 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 3 

4. Regardless of any inconsistency between conditions of this AO and Section IX.H.2.b.0 

and Section IX.H.2, this AO shaIl take precedence as provided by R307-1-3.2.4, UAC. 

5. , A copy of this AO shall be posted on site. The AO shall be available to the employees 

who operate the air emission producing equipment. These employees shall receive 

instruction as to their responsibilities in operating the equipment according to all of the 

relevant conditions listed below. 

6. The approved instaIlations shalI consist of the following equipment: 

A. Tunnel Kiln #1 

B. Tunnel Kiln #3 

C. Tunnel Kiln #4 

_ D. Grizrzly Hopper 

E. Primary Crusher 

F. Secondary Crusher/Grinding 

G. Screens 

H. Two Lime SiIos 

I. Clay Storage Piles 

J. Miscellaneous DieseI Equipment 

K. Line 3 Baghouse - Micro Pulsaire* 

L. Line 4 Baghouse - Micro Pulsaire* 

* Or Equivalent 

7. This AO shall replace the AO dated October 20, 1980. 

8. Interstate Brick shall rebuild the scrubber or design a new scrubbing system for Kiln #3. 

If the scrubber is rebuiit, the scrubber shall be rebuilt as described in the Notice of Intent 

dated December 10, 1993. Should the scrubber require replacement, or modifications 

other than those described as "Alternative A" in the December 10, 1993, Notice of 

Intent, Interstate Brick shall submit complete design specifcations including operating 

parameters and proposed emission limitations for approval prior to construction. In no 

case shall emissions of any poilutant from a newly designed scrubbing system exceed 

emission limitations listed in this AO as final limits. 

4 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 4 

Interstate Brick shall modify the scrubber for KiIn #4 as proposed in the Notice of Intent 

dated November 30, 1992. In addition, Interstate Brick shall operate the scrubber for 

Kiln #4 using soda ash in the scrubbing solution until modiHcations to the scrubber for 

Kiln #3 are complete and stack testing on the scrubber for Kiln #3 demonstrates that the 

scrubber is meeting the emission limits listed in this AO. 

Limitations and Tests Procedures 

9. Emissions to the atmosphere from the indicated emission point shall not exceed the 

following rates and concentrations: 

, A. Scrubber Emissions - Tunnel Kiln #1: 

llutan Transition Limits Final Limits 

(to October 1. 1995) 

PMio(annual average)* Shall not operate 1.9 lb/hr 

, SO:(1-hr average) 17.0 lb/hr 

SO~ (annuaI average) 14.0 lb/hr 

NO; 1.8 lb/hr, 

HF (1-hr average) 4.5 !b/hr 

HF (annual average) 1.5 lb/hr 

B. Scrubber Emissions - Tunnel Kiln #3: 

Pollutant Transition Limits Final Limits 

(to October 1. 1995) 

PM,o(annual average)* 3.6 lb/hr 1.9 lb/hr 

S02(1-hr average) 105.0 lb/hr 17.0 Ib/hr 

SO;(annual average) 36.8 lb/hr 14.0 lb/hr 

NO= 1.8 lb/hr 1.8 !b/hr 

HF (1-hr average) 10.5 Ib/hr 4.5 lb/hr 

HF (annual average) 3.5 !b/hr 1.5 lb/hr 

~~ 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 5 

C. Scrubber Emissions - Tunnel KiIn #4 

Pollutant Transition Limits Final Limits 

(to October l. 1995) 

PMIO(annual average)* 12.3 Ib/hr 12.3 lb/hr 

SOZ(1-hr average) 51.01b/hr 77.0 ib/hr 

SO; (annual average) 18.0 lb/hr 27.0 lb/hr 

NO; 2.6 Ib/hr 2.6 lb/hr 

HF (1-hr average) 5.7 Ib/hr 7.2 Ib/hr 

HF (annual average) 1.9 lb/hr 2.41b/hr 

* PM,oemission rates expressed as annual averages above for the scrubbers for 

Kilns #1, #2, and #3 shall be demonstrated through an 8-hr stack test. ShouId 

PlVt,oemissions test at a higher rate than the limits expressed above, Interstate 

Brick shall provide documentation which demonstrates that the limits are being 

met, on an annual average basis, within 30 days of the date of the stack test. 

The method provided in the documentation shall be verifiable. 

D. Primary Crusher Baghouse Vent 

PMIO 0.49 Ibs/hr 0.016 grains/dscf 

E. Line 3 Baghouse 

PM10 0.37 ibs/hr 0.016 grains/dscf 

F. Line 4 Baghouse 

PM,o 0.67 Ibs/hr 0.016 grains/dscf 

10. Stack testing to show compliance with the emission limitations stated in the above 

condition (excluding annual average emission rates for SO :and HF, but inciudin}annual 

average emission rates for PM, o) shall be performed as specified below: 

Emission Point Pollutant Testing Test 

Status Frequencx 

Scrubber, Kiln #1 PM,o *** ® 

SO, *** % 

HF *** % 

`F~ 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 6 

Scrubber, Kiln #3 PM,o ** ® 

S0, ** o 

N0., ** ® 

HF ** % 

Scrubber, Tunnel Kiln #4 PM10 ** ® 

SO, ** 9b 

NO= ** ® 

HF ** % 

Primary Crusher Baghouse Pbilo ** !g? 

Line 3 Baghouse PM10 

Line 4 Baghouse PN110 ** ® 

Testing Status(To be applied above) 

** Initial compliance testing is required. The initial test shall be completed by 

December 1, 1994, to show compliance with emissions limits listed during the 

transition period. 

An additional initial test shall be completed to show compliance with emission 

limits listed as final Iimits. Testing to show compliance with the final emission 

limits shaII be completed by November 1, 1995 

*** Initial compliance testing is required within 30 days of start-up of Tuanei KiIn 

#1. 

~ Test if directed by the Executive Secretary. Tests mav berequired if the source 

is suspected to be in violation with other conditions of this AO. 

# Test every year 

95 Test every three years 

A. Notification 

The applicant shall provide a notification of the test date at least 30 days before the test. 

A pretest conference shall be held if directed by the Executive Secretary. It shall be held 

at least 15 days before the test between the ownerloperator, the tester, and the Executive 

Secretary. The emission point shall be designed to conform to the requirements of 40 

CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 1, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration 

(OSHA) or Mine Safety and Health Administration (NiSHA) approvable access shall be 

provided to the test location. 

A~ 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 7 

B. PNf io 

For stacks in which no iiquid drops are present, the foIlowing methods shall be used: 40 

CFR 51, Appendix M, Nfethods 201 or 201a. The back half condensibles shall also be 

tested u'sing the method specified by the Executive Secretary. All particulate captured 

shall be considered PMIO,, 

For stacks in which liquid drops are present, methods to eliminate the liquid drops should 

be expiored. If no reasonable method to eliminate the drops exists, then the following 

methods shall be used: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5, Sa, 5d, or 5e as 

appropriate. The back half condensibles shall also be tested using the method specifed 

by the Executive Secretary. The portion of the front half of the catch considered PM, o 

shall be based on information in AP-42, Appendix C or other data acceptable to the 

Execudve Secretary. 

The back half condensibles shall not be used for compliance demonstration but shall be 

used for inventory purposes. 

Compliance testing of PM,o emissions for Kilns #1, #2, and #3 shall be conducted over 

an eight hour time period. 

C. Sample Location 

40 CFR 60. Appendix A, Method 1 

D. Volumetrfc Fiow Rate 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2 

E. Sulfur Dioxide (SO,) 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6, 6A, 6B or 6C 

F. Nitrogen Oxides (NO_) 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 7, 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D or 7E 

G. Hvdroflouric Acid (HF) 

The test method shall be submitted for approval or may be assigned by the Executive 

Secretary. 

. 

. 

q~" 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 8 

H. Calculations 

To determine mass emission rates (Ibs/hr, etc.), the pollutant concentration as determined 

by the appropriate methods above shall be multiplied by the volumetric flow rate and anv 

necessary conversion factors determined by the Executive Secretary to give the results 

in the specified units of the emission limitation. 

I. riew Source .Oneration 

For a new source/emission point (Line 4 and Line 5 baghouses), the production rate 

during all compliance testing shall be no less than 9090 of the production rate listed in 

this A0. If the maximum AO allowable production rate has not been achieved at the 

time of the test, the following procedure shaIl be followed: 

1). Testing shall be at no less than 90% of the production rate achieved to 

date. 

2) If the test is passed, the new maximum allowable production rate shall 

be 110% of the tested achieved rate. This new allowable maximum 

production rate shall remain in affect until successfully tested at a higher 

rate. 

3) The owner/operator shall request a higher production rate when 

necessary. Testing at no less than 90R'o of the higher rate shall be 

conducted. A new maximum production rate (110 0 of the new rate) 

wiil then be alIowed if the test is successful. This process may be 

repeated until the maximum AO production rate is achieved. 

J. Existing Source Operation 

For an existing sourcelemission point, the production rate during all compliance 

testing shall be no less than 90% of the maximum production achieved in the 

previous three (3) years. 

11. Compliance with annual average limitations listed in condition ##9 shall be determined 

through a method of mass balance. Interstate Brick shall submit a mass balance method 

of determining annual emissions to the Executive Secretary for approval no later than 

December 1, 1994. The plan shall include: 

A. Proposed test methods and test frequency for determining the weight of the 

elemental sulfur and fluorine contained in the clays used to manufacture brick 

B. Proposed test methods and test frequency for determining the weight of the 

elemental sulfur and fluorine contained in the finished product 

C. A method of determining scrubber efficiencies as an annual average 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 9 

D. Calculation method of determining annuaI emissions of SO:and HF which wiIl 

demonstrate compliance with the annual average emission rate(s) listed in 

condition #9 of this AO 

12. The following limits shall not be exceed without prior approvaI in accordance with R307- 

1-3.1, UAC. 

A. Production/Consumption limits 

i) Raw Clay Consumption 

120 tons/hr 

1,051,200 tons/year 

ii) 512,582 tons of brick produced per 12-month period, plantwide 

B. Tunnel Kiln #1 

Annual production limit of bricks included in 12.A.ii above 

Note: Interstate Brick is not operating Tunnel KiIn #1 as of the date of this AO 

and it is not allowed to operate during the transition period (to 1011195). The 

scrubber for KiIn #1 requires rebuilding and modifications to meet the emission 

limits contained in condition #9. Interstate Brick shall submit a complete 

description of proposed modifications to the scrubber for Tunnel Kiln #1; and 

receive approval from the Executive Secretary, prior to construction. 

C. Tunnel Kiln #3 

Annual production limit of bricks included in 12.A.ii above 

D. Tunnel KiIn #4 

Annual production limit of bricks inciuded in 12.A.ii above 

E. Line 3 Baghouse 

6,240 hours per year 

F. Line 4 Baghouse 

6,240 hours per year 

Compliance with the annual limitations shall be determined on a rolling 12-month total. 

The owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total based on the first day of each 

month using data from the previous 12 months. Records of consumption/production shall 

be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records of 

~lr 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 10 

consuniption%production, inciuding rolling 12-month totals shall be made available to the 

Executive Secretary or his representative upon request, and shaIl include a period of two 

years ending with the date of the request. The records shall be kept on a daily basis. 

Hours of operation shall be determined by supervisor monitoring and maintaining of an 

operations log. 

13. Visible emissions from the foIlowing emission points shaIl not exceed the following 

values: 

A. All crushers - 15 90 opacity 

B. All screens - 10% opacity 

C. All conveyor transfer points - 10% opacity 

D. All baghouses - 10% opacity 

E. All other points - 2090 opacity 

Opacity observations of emissions from statfonary sources shall be conducted according 

to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. Visible emissions from mobile sources and 

intermittent sources shaIl use procedures simiiar to Method 9, but the requirement for 

observations to be made at 15-second intervals over a six-minute period shall not apply. 

14. The moisture content of the clay shall be maintained at an average of no less than 4.095 

by weight. The siIt content of the ciay shall be no greater than an average of 18.09 by 

weight. The moisture content and the silt content shaIl be tested if directed by the 

Executive Secretary using the appropriate ASTM method. 

15. The storage pites shall be watered to minimize generation of fugitive dusts as dry 

conditions warrant or as determined necessary by the Executive Secretary. 

Fuels 

16. The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a fuei and propane as a backup fuel in 

the kilns. If any other fuei is to be used, an AO shall be required in accordance with 

R307-1-3.1, UAC. 

od lina 

17. Tliis source has been modeled for fluoride emissions prior to issuance of this AO. 

Interstate Brick shall submit an analysis using parameters measured during the initial 

stack test for each scrubber. The analysis shall include parameters measured as compared 

with the parameters used in the modeling exercise compieted. Critical parameters to be 

included in the analysis are as follows: 

A. Exhaust exit temperature 

B. Exhaust exit velocity/flow 

C. Fluoride emission rate 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page I1 

The results 'of the analysis shall be used to determine the applicability of the modeling 

completed. Additional modeling shaIl be performed if directed by the Executive 

Secretary. 

Monitorine 

18. Interstate Brick shall instali, calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device for the 

continuous measurement of the chan;e in Q,ressure of the ;as stream through each 

cru ber. The monitoring device must be ce.rtifed by the maaufacturer. The monitoring 

device shall be accurate within plus or minus one inch of water gauge and must be 

calibrated on an annual basis according to the manufacturer's instructions. Continuous 

recording for the monitoring device is not required. However, daily records of readings 

shall be maintained and dates of calibrations shall be recorded. 

Interstate Brick shall measure and record the pressure drop during each compliance stack 

test of each scrubber. The pressure drop measured during the most recent compliance 

stack test shall be the minimum (-10%) of that required during all operating periods. 

19. Interstate Brick shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device for the 

continuous measurement of the scrubbine liquid flow rate to the scrubber . The 

monitoring device must be certified by the manufacturer. Accuracy shall be within plus 

or minus tive percent of the design scrubbing liquid flow rate. Calibration shall be on 

an annual basis according to the manufacturer's instructions. Continuous recording for 

the monitoring device is not required. However, daily records of readings shall be 

maintained and dates of calibrations shall be recorded. 

Interstate Brick shall measure aad record the scrubbing liquid flow rate during each 

compiiance stack test on each scrubber. The scrubbing liquid flow rate measured during 

the most recent compliaace stack test shall be the minimum (-10fo) of that required 

during all operating periods. 

20. Interstate Brick shall measure the pH of the scrubbing solution for each scrubber on a 

daily basis. The measuring device must be certified by the manufacturer as being 

accurate to plus or minus 5%. The measuring device shall be calibrated on a monthly 

basis. 

Interstate Brick shall measure and record the pH of the scrubbing liquid, and the type of 

neutralizer (hydrated time, soda ash, etc.) during each compliance stack test of each 

scrubber. The pH measured during the latest compliance stack test shall be the minimum 

pH (-5%) of the scrubbing solution during all operating periods. The neutralizer used 

during the most recent compliance stack test shall be that required during all operating 

periods. 

Records & Miscellaneous 

21. All installations and facilities authorized by this AO shall be adequately and properly 

maintained. All pollution control vendor recommended equipment shall be installed, 

WK 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 12 

maintained, and operated. Instructions from the vendor or established maintenance 

practices that maximize pollution controi shall be used. All necessary equipment control 

and operating devices, such as pressure gauges, amp meters, volt meters, flow rate 

indicators, temperature gau;es, continuous emission monitors (CEMs), etc., shall be 

instalIed and operated properly aad ea.sily accessibie to compliance inspectors. A copy 

of all manufacturers' operating instruction for poIlution control equipment and pollution 

emitting equipment shall be kept on site. These instructions shail be available to all 

employees who operate the equipment and shaIl be made available to compliance 

inspectors upon their request. 

22. All records referenced in this AO or in applicable NSPS or NESHAP, which are required 

to be kept by the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Executive Secretary or 

his representative upon request. Examples of records to be kept at this source shall 

include the following as applicable: 

A. Production rate/operating hour limitations (Condition number 12) 

B. Scrubber operating parameters (Condition numbers 18, 19, and 20) 

C. Unavoidable Breakdown Reports (Condition number 24) 

D. Emergency episodes (Condition number 25) 

23. The owner/operator shall comply with R307-1-3.5, UAC. This rule addresses emission 

inventory reporting requirzments. 

24. The owner/operator shall compiy with R307-1-4.7, UAC. This rule addresses 

unavoidable breakdown reporting requirements. The owner/operator shall 

calculate/estimate the excess emissions whenever a breakdown occurs. The total of 

excess emissions shall be reported to the Executive Secretary as directed for each 

calendar year. 

25. The owner/operator shall submit to the Executive Secretary an emergency episode plan 

within 60 days of the date of this AO. The pian shall identify what control/production 

measures the owner/operator shall implement when an emergency episode is declared by 

the Executive Director of the Department of Environmental Quality. Specific 

control/production measures shall be outlined for all three levels (Alert, Warning, 

Emergency). The values for the various leveis are listed in R307-1-5, UAC. The 

emergency plan shall be approved by the Executive Secretary. 

Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be approved in accordance 

with R307-1-3. 1. 1, UAC. 

This AO in no way releases the owner or operator from any liability for compliance with all other 

applicable federal, state, and local regulations including the UACR. 

49 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 13 

Annual emissions for this source, the entire plant, are currently calculated at the foilowing values: 

Pollutant Total Emissions 

tons/vear 

TSP 112.1 

PM10 88.8 

SOZ 240.9 

NOX 65.7 

CO 27.2 

VOC 0.8 

HF 23.7 

These calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicability of Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration (PSD) aad nonattainment area major source requirements of the UACR. They are not to 

be used for purposes of determining compliance. 

In accordance with the requirements of Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act, the following pollutants may 

be subject to an operating permit fee. Both the fee rate and the ciass of pollutants are subject to change 

by state, the federal agencies, or both. 

Pollutant Total Emissions 

Tons/Year 

PM,o 88.8 

SO: 240.9 

NOx 65.7 

VOC 0.8 

HF 23.7 

The Division of Air Quality is authorized to charge a fee for reimbursement of the actual costs incurred 

in the issuance of an AO. Unless you have comments which would require additional work, the fee for 

this AO will be $4,625.00. An invoice is attached. Your AO can be issued as soon as payment is 

received. 

S incerely, 

L"ynn R. Menlove, Manager 

New Source Review Section 

m 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 14 

Interstate Brick Company 

Tnnnel Itiln #4 

Salt Lake County - CDS A1 NA Toxics TitleVMajor 

Filing Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Review Engineer 64.00 hours @ $50.00/hr . . . . 

Modeler . . . . 28.50 hours @ $50.00/hr . . . . 

•. Computer Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Notice To Paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Travel . . . . . 0.0 miles @ $0.23/mile . . . . 

Total Charges . . . 

Amount Paid to Date 

$ 0.00 

$ 3,200.00 

$ 1,425.00 

$ 0.00 

$ 0.00 

$ 0.00 

$ 4,625.00 

$ 0.00 

Balance Due -. . . . 

Please remit a cop9 of this invoice with your Uayment. 

Please send payment to: 

Utah Division of Air Quality 

1950 West North Temple 

Salt Lake City, IItah 84114-8420 

(801) 536-4000 

$ 4,625.00 

5 

Appendix "B" 

(AET Pretest Protocol) 

~3 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL 

TESTING COMPANY, INC. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

Pre-test Information Form & Attachments 

SOURCE INFORMATION September 29, 1995 

Facility Name: Interstate Brick Company 

Units to be Tested: 1. No. 3 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 

2. No. 3 Brick Kiln Scrubber Outlet 

Mailing Address: 9780 South 5200 West, West Jordan, Utah 84088-5689 

Plant Address: Same as above 

Phone: (801) 280-5200 

Plant Contact: Mr. John Hewitt, Plant Manager 

Test Date: October 31, 1995 

CONTRACTOR OR TEST FIRM 

Name: American Environmental Testing, Company, Inc. 

Address: 565 South Birch Drive, Spanish Fork, Utah, 84660 

Phone: (801) 266-7111 

Contact: V. Brent Benson, Technical Director 

SOURCE TEST SUMMARY 

EPA Method 1 Location of Sample & Velocity Inlet & Outlet 

Traverses from Stationary 

Sources 

EPA Method 2 Stack Gas Velocity and Fiow Inlet & Outlet 

Rate from Stationary Sources 

-1- s4 
EPA Method 3 Gas Analysis for Carbon Dioxide Inlet & Outlet 

Oxygen, Excess Air & Dry 

Molecular Weight of Stack 

C~es 

EPA Method 4 Moisture Content in Stack Inlet & Outlet 

C-eses 

EPA Method 5 Particulate Emissions from Inlet & Outlet 

Stationary Sources 

EPA Method 6C Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Inlet & Outlet 

Stationary Sources 

(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) 

EPA Method 7E Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Inlet & Outlet 

Stationary Sources 

(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) 

EPA Method 10 Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Inlet & Outlet 

Stationary Sources 

(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) 

EPA Method 13B Totai Fluoride Emissions from Inlet & Outlet 

Stationary Sources 

(Specific lon Electrode Method) 

EPA Method 202 Back-Half Condensable Emissions from Inlet & Outlet 

Stationary Sources 

SAMPLE TRAIN AND ANALYSIS INFORMATION 

Interstate Brick company is currently operating under the Utah Department of Environmental 

Quality (UDEO) "Intent to Approve Number DAQE-947-94" which requires that particulate 

testing be accomplished using EPA Method 201 A; unless liquid drops are present in the gas 

stream. If this is found to be the case, EPA Method 5/202 will be used to substitute for EPA 

Method 201 A. The back half condensables shall be tested using the method specified by the 

Executive Secretary (EPA Method 202). 

An EPA Method 201 A sample train will be employed to perform the above referenced PM 10 

testing. The sampling device used is a Cyclone I of the SRI/EPA five-stage series cyclone. This 

device provides a 10 micron size cut at a flow rate of approximately 0.5 dscfm; the precise flow 

rate depends on local stack conditions. A glass or teflon probe liner will be used and maintained 

at a temperature of 248 0± 25°F for the duration of the test. The filter holder wiil also be kept 

at a temperature of 248° ± 25°F. The first two (2) impingers will contain 100 mis of 

distilled water, the third impinger will be lift empty, and the fourth will contain a known 

amount of silica gel. AII impingers will be weighed before and after each test to determine the 

moisture content of the gases. The impinger bath will be maintained at a temperature lower that 

/ 

i h -'_- ~ J 
68°F to condense the moisture. The back-half impinger solutions will be evaporated and 

weighed or extracted with methyiene chloride and evaporated and weighed as per EPA Method 

202 depending on the pH of the solution. Pitot tubes and the meter system will be leak checked 

before and after sampling. Figure 1 is a schematic of the EPA Method 201A sample train to be 

used. 

The giass filters will be of binderless variety (Anderson Smellers P-2710 + 99.95% efficient 

on 0.3 microns particulate). The nozzle, cycione, and outside of the turn around cup will be 

washed with AR grade acetone and be considered to be larger than PM 10. The inside of the tum 

around cup, the stem leading down to the filter and the filter holder itself will be washed with 

AR grade acetone. This catch, along with the filter wiil be used for the particulate emissions 

calculations for PM10. 

EPA Method 1313 will be used to determine the hydrofluoric acid (HF) emissions from 

stationary sources as specified in Federal and State regulations. Particulate and gaseous 

hydrofluoric ac9d are extracted from the stack isokinetically using a modified EPA Method 5 

sample train. Total fluoride is determined on the filter, probe and prefiiter glassware and in 

the back-half impinger water using a specific ion electrode. 

EPA Methods 6C, 7E & 10 are instrumental methods. The sample train incorporates taking a 

sample line from the stack, conditioning the sample, and finally running it through the 

analyzers. Figure II is a schematic of the analyzer sample train, showing both sample line 

locations and calibration line locations. Variations to this schematic wiil be made according to 

each method. The mass emission calculations for S0 2 , NOx& CO wiil use the flow rate (DSCFH) 

derived from each of the. EPA Method 201A/202 tests respectfully. 

CEMS Gas Standards for Determination of Compliance 

The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Methods 6C, 7E and 10 requires that the following 

items are met: 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide (S0 2 ) in nitrogen in the 

following ranges for the span value of 0 to 1000 ppm: 

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). 

AET had a zero gas of purified N2 that was < 0.1 ppm S02. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 

60 percent of the span value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas will be 514.6 ppm, which is in the acceptable 

range. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 

100 percent of the span value. 

AET's high-level calibration gas will be 901.6 which is in the acceptable range. 
~ 

d 

L 

~ 

~ 

LL 

C 

~ i 

H 

~ 

a 

F 

cc 

cn 

Q 

T 

~ 

N 

a 

O 

t 

,.. 

~ 

~ 

a 

W 

oc 

W 

N W 

N 

dc 

N 

OC 

W 

W E 

Z O 

J Z 

~ 

~ !

i { 

OC 

W 

H 

W 

~ 

O 

~ 

OC 

W 

S 

F~ 

W 

m 

O ~c 

a 

oc o 

W ~ y 

C ~ 

J { O W S = W. 

W 

W J 

J W 

c 

N 

O 

~ 

J 

W 

C7 

~ { 

CJ 

N ~ 

~

N v 

m 

~ J LN. 

F~ 

tl! 

C 

W t` 

=0 W 

C.~ ~ ~ 

Z ~ L~ 

~ O 

C 

W 

H { 

99 

e m 

Fig I J ~ 

w 

~ W 

V S { { 

} CS i~ 

7 G. 

~ 

~ d"FLIN 

I~ 

x 

W 

CA ! 

0 

• a 

W 

J 

N 

N 

O 

r ~; 

~ W ~ 

a~ 

~ } ~ ~~ o 

— ~ a 

--~ - 61 
;k 

CEM Sample Train 

Figure II 

Continuous Emissions Anslyzers 

Calibration Gsses 

sr~ 

-5- 
2. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of carbon monoxide (CO) in nitrogen in the 

following ranges for the span value of 0 to 100 ppm. 

a Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm CO). 

AET will use a zero gas of purified N2 that is <0.1 ppm CO. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to 

approximately 30 percent of the span vaiue. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas will be 32.4. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a carbon monoxide concentration equivalent to 

approximately 60 percent of the span value. 

AET's high-level calibration gases will be 62.7 ppm. 

3. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide (NO x) in nitrogen in the 

following ranges for the span value of 0 to 100 ppm: 

a Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NOx). 

AET has a zero gas of purified N 2that is < 0.1 ppm NOx. 

b. Mid-level catibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 

60 percent of the span value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas will be 53.4 ppm, which is in the acceptable 

range. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 

100 percent of the span value. 

AET's high-level calibratio.n gas will be 86.8 ppm which is in the acceptable 

range. 

4. Measurement System Performance Specifications 

During the S02, NOx and CO tests, AET's measurement system is required to meet the 

following criteria: 

a. Zero drift <_ to 3.0% of the span value. 

b. Calibration drift <_ 3.0% of the span value. 

c. Calibration bias error has to be <_ 5.0% of the calibration gas value. 

These conditions will be met. 

-6- ~Z 
Current calibration gas certificates of analysis for S0 2, NO xand CO are included in 

Appendix ."A": AII standards to be employed for the tests wiil have current 

certifications. 

CALIBRATION DATA 

The EPA and State agencies require various calibrations for specific equipment used during 

testing. The current caiibration data is included in Appendix "A". A sample of all field data 

forms will be made available at the job site. 

PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 

The manufacture of bricfc and related products such as ciay pipe, pottery and some types of 

refractory brick involves the mining, grinding, screening and blending of the raw materials, 

and the forming, cutting or shaping, drying or curing, and firing of the final product. 

. Surface ciays and shales are mined in open pits. Most fine clays are found underground. After 

mining, the material is crushed to remove stones and is stirred before it passes onto screens for 

segregation by particle size. 

To start the forming process, clay is mixed with water, usually in a pug mill. The three 

principal processes for forming brick are stiff mud, soft mud and dry press. In the stiff mud 

process, sufficient water is added to give the clay plasticity, and bricks are formed by forcing 

the clay through a die. Wire is used in separating bricks. AII structural tile and most and most 

brick are formed by this process. The soft mud process is usually used with clay too wet for the 

stiff mud process. The ciay is mixed with water to a moisture content of 20 to 30 percent, and 

the bricks are formed in molds. In the dry press process, ciay is mixed with a small amount of 

water and formed in steel molds by applying pressure of 500 to 1500 pounds per square inch. 

Wet clay units that have been formed are almost completely dried before firing, usually with 

waste heat from kilns. Many types of kilns are used for firing brick, but the most common are 

the downdraft periodic kiln and the tunnel kiln. The periodic kiln is a permanent brick 

structure with a number of fireholes where fuel enters the furnace. Hot gases from the fuel are 

drawn up over the bricks, down through then by underground flues, and out of the oven to the 

chimney. Although lower heat recovery makes this type less efficient than the tunnel kiln, the 

uniform temperature distribution leads to a good quality product. 

STACK SCHEMATIC AND TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS 

Attached are the schematics showing plan and elevation of ducting and stack arrangements 

including sample port positions relative to upstream and downstream disturbances. Also 

included are cross-sectional sketches of the stack at the sampling locations. 

1. Figure III is a drawing of the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet. 

2. Figure IV is a drawing of the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet. 

3. Traverse point locations for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Inlet are listed in Table l. 

4. Traverse point locations for the Kiln No. 3 Scrubber Outlet are listed in Table II. 

-7- l~~ 
Interstate Brick Cornpany's Kiln No. 3 

Scrubber Inlet. Stack Diagram 

Figure III 

Ak 

48" 

A= 251 "= 5.23 Diameters B= 120" = 2.5 Diameters 

-8- ~ ` 
)8.0" • 1.63 Diamters 

?64.0" m 4.4 Diamters 

Interstate Brick Company's Kiin No. 3 

Scrubber Outfet Stack Diagram 

Figure IV 

~1---- 60.0" I.D. --~ 

o 
5 10 15 20 

. . . . 

4 9 14 19 

. . . . 

3 8 13 18 

. . . . 

2 'r 12 17 

. . . . 

1 6 11 16 

. . . . 

48" 

9.6 ~ . 

4. 8 .. 

Interstate Brick Company's Kiln No. 3 

Scrubber Inlet Traverse Point Locations 

Table 1 

48" 

~6 66 66 66 

Sample Ports are 15" Long 

Sample Poi nt Distanc¢ from outside of Port 

1, 6, 1 1, 16 19.8" = 19 3/4" 

2, ?, 12, 17 29.4" = 29 3!8" 

3, 8, 1.3, 18 39.0" = 39.. 

4, 9, 14, 19 '- -W-IW 

5, 10, 15, 20 58.2" = 58 1 /4" 

-io- ~3 
AMEFtICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

Table II 

TRAVERSE POINT CALCULATIONS 

.. ■ _ -~ _- _ :• , •,,•. ■ 

~ . _ • 

.- ■ . . . . . . ~ { ~ . .~_ • _ 

.. ■ • _. - .. 

. . • • . _ ~ 

Traverse Percent of Stack I.D. Product of Distance Traverse Point 

Point Stacic I.D. inches col. 2&3 Y Location from 

Number (to 118 in) outside of ports 

(sum of columns 

4 & 5) 

1& 13 2.1 60 1.26 6.0" 7.26 = 7 1/4" 

2& 14 6.7 60 4.02 6.0" 10.02 = 10.0" 

3& 15 11.8 60 7.08 6. 0" 13.08 = 13 1/8" 

4& 16 17.7 60 10.62 6.0" 16.62 = 16 5/8" 

5& 17 25 60 15 6.0" 21.0 = 21.0" 

6& 18 35.6 60 21.36 6.0" 27.36 = 27 3/8" 

7& 19 64.4 60 38.64 6.0" 44.64 = 44 5/8" 

8& 20 75 60 45 6.0" 51.0" 

9& 21 82.3 60 49.38 6.0" 55.38 = 55 3/8" 

10 & 22 88.2 60 52.92 6.0" 58.92 = 58 7/8" 

11 & 23 93.3 60 55.98 6.0" 61.98 = 62.0" 

12 & 24 97.9 60 58.74 6.0" 64.74 = 64 3/4" 

- i I - 1) 
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS AND OTHER REQUIRE3MENTS 

AII testing stations will be accessible from OSHA approved scaffolding or platforms. AET will 

require 4- 120V, 20 amp, 10 circuits to be provided by Interstate Bricic Company in order to 

perform the emissions tests. 

PROPOSED TESTING OUTLINE 

A Each of the Methods 201 A/202 tests will be approximateiy 60 minutes. 

B. Nozzie diameter will be selected after pretest data is collected. 

O EPA Method 3, will be used to determine the dry molecular weight of the gas stream. 

The gas analysis will be conducted at the job site using an Orsat. 

D. The moisture content and particulate concentration of the gas stream will be measured 

by using EPA Method 2-201 A/202. The impingers wiil be weighed at the job site. 

31.8 DSCFH will be collected at a rate greater than 0.531 dscfm if Method 5/202 

' replaces 201 A/202. 

E An "S" Type Pitot Tube will be used to measure the velocity of the gas stream using 

EPA Method 2(if the stacic is 12" inches or greater). An inciined manometer will be 

used to measure the velocity head. The first mark on the manometer is 0.01 inches of 

water column from the zero mark. Current pitot tube and meter calibrations are 

attached in Appendix "A" with the Calibration Data. 

F. Barometric pressure will be measured at the stacic sampling position via an aneroid 

barometer. 

G, The cross over piece located between the filter and probe will be modified to receive a 

thermocouple to determine the temperature of the gases leaving the probe. 

H. S02emissions will be determined via EPA Method 6C using a TECO Model 40 Pulsed 

Fluorescence Analyzer. Three each -30 minute tests will be run for S02 emissions. 

I. NO x emissions will be determined via EPA Method 7E using a TECO Model 10 AR 

Chemiluminescent N0/NOX Analyzer. Three each 30 minute tests will be run for NO x 

emissions. 

J. CO emissions will be determined via EPA Method 10 using a TECO Model 48 Gas Filter 

Correlation (GFC) CO Analyzer. Three each 30 minute tests will be run for CO 

emissions. 

K. A data-logger will be used to record the test data for each of the three S0 2, NOxand CO 

emissions tests with 30 separate readings for each run at one minute intervals . 

-12- ~o~ 
Appendix "A" 

(Calibration Data) 

im 
American Environmentai Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11 

Meter Box Caiibration Data Form 

(English Units) 

Date Barometric Pressure Mete.► Box Number 

9/22/95 25.54 RAC #145-569 

Averagg Y Average OH Calibrated By Std. Meter Yi 

0.98S 1.812 VBB - RBB 0.99497 

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter AH/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting OH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

0.50 4.85 5 70 0.03676 68 

71 

_ 1.00 4.81 5 70 . 0.07353 68 

• 71 

1.50 9.711 10 70 0.11029 68 

71 

2.00 9.683 10 69 0.14706 68 

70 

3.00 9.458 10 69 0.22059 67 

70 

4.00 9.469 10 70 0.29412 68 

71 

Dry Gas Meter 

Inlet Outlet Average Time PJ 

(Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi AH 

71 75 73.50 11.14 0.9738 1.7109 

72 76 

72 78 76.00 8.09 0.9689 1.8262 

74 80 

76 85 82.25 12.89 0.9880 1.6865 

79 89 

83 96 91.00 11.55 0.9996 1.7870 

85 100 

87 107 98.00 9.57 0.9879 1.8975 

89 109 

91 113 102.50 8.46 0.9923 1.9642 

92 114 

Average Yi Average AH 

0.985 1.812 

~~ 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11 

Meter Box Calibration Data Form 

(Engiish Units) 

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number 

9/2/95 25.62 UT 790-484 

Average Yi Averagg AH Calibrated By Std. Meter Yi 

0.985 1.719 BAL - GEJ 0.99497 

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter AH/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting OH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

0.50 4.84 5 72 0.03676 71 

72 

1.00 4.88 5 73 0.07353 72 

' 73 

• 1.50 9.62 10 73 0.11029 70 

73 

2.00 9.72 10 74 0.14706 73 

73 

3.00 9.79 10 73 0.22059 73 

73 

4.00 9.78 10 74 0.29412 74 

74 

Dry Gas Meter 

Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 

(Td i) -F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi AH 

70 77 74.25 11.23 0.9676 1.7578 

71 79 

71 83 78.25 8.15 0.9797 1.8147 

72 87 

73 92 84.25 12.54 0.9787 1.6277 

74 98 

75 100 88.00 11.08 0.9887 1.6670 

75 102 

76 104 91.25 9.05 0.9988 1.6347 

78 107 

79 108 94.25 8.25 0.9985 1.8120 

81 109 

Average Yi Average AH 

0.985 1.719 

I 

!~ 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Forlc, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11 

Meter Box Calibration Data Form 

(Engiish Units) 

Date Barometric Pressure _ Meter Box ,Vumber 

9/22/95 25.54 RAC #2824 

Averagg Yi Average LH Caiibrated Bv Std. Meter Yi 

0.910 1.630 VBB - RBS 0.99497 

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter 4LH/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting OH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

0.50 4.57 5 69 0.03676 69 

69 

1.00 4.58 5 70 0.073 53 69.5 

~ - 69 

1.50 8.91 10 70 0.11029 70 

70 

2.00 8.901 10 71 0.14706 70.5 

70 

3.00 8.84 10 69 0.22059 69.5 

70 

4.00 8.829 10 71 0.29412 70.5 

70 

Dry Gas Meter 

Inlet Outfet Average Time 0 

(Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi CH 

71 70 70.50 9.88 0.9107 1.5301 

70 71 

71 77 74.50 7.19 0.9174 1.6045 

72 78 

74 87 82.25 11.83 0.9031 1.7002 

76 92 

78 96 88.00 10.09 0.9096 1.6382 

80 98 

82 101 92.25 8.324 0.9095 1.6762 

84 102 

86 104 95.25 7.104 0.9090 1.6292 

88 103 

Average Yi Average AH 

0.910 1.630 

a 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish For1c, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1 

Meter Box Calibration Data Form 

(Engiish Units) 

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number 

9/2/95 25.61 CR #(097) 

Averaae Yi Average AH Caiibrated By Std, Meter Yi 

1.070 1.883 VBB - JPB 0.99497 

Orfice Manometei Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter AH/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting LH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

0.50 5.42 5 70 0.03676 70 

70 

1.00 5.517 5 71 0.07353 71 

' . 71 

1.50 10.64 10 72 0.11029 72 

72 

2.00 10.71 10 73 0.14706 73 

73 

3.00 10.84 10 73 0.22059 73 

73 

4.00 10.88 10 74 0.29412 74 

74 

Dry Gas Meter 

Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 

(Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) 'F Minutes Yi OH 

70 69 69.75 12.75 1.0765 1.8160 

70 70 

71 70 70.75 9:18 1.0942 1.8207 

71 71 

71 72 71.75 14.71 1.0536 1.8889 

72 72 

71 72 72.00 12.96 1.0575 1.9358 

72 73 

72 73 72.50 10.9 1.0683 2.0031 

72 73 

73 74 73.50 9.05 1.0692 1.8310 

73 74 

Average Yi Average AH 

1.070 1.883 

/)'b 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

P9tot Tube Identification Number: 8' - A 

Calibrated By: RBB - tbb 

"A" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.3 0.4 0.8660 

2 0.3 0.4 0.8660 

3 0.31 0.41 0.8695 

Average: 0.8672 

"B" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.31 0.41 0.8695 

2 0.3 0.4 0.8660 

3 0.31 0.4 0.8803 

9ate: 9/2//95 

Deviation 

-0.00117 

-0.00117 

0.00234 

Deviation 

-0.00243 

-0.00594 

0.00837 

Average: 0.8720 

A & B Average = 0.8696 

W 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111 

Pitot Tube Caiibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identification Number. 8' - B D2te:9/20/95 

Caiibrated By: RB RH 

"A" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(indies H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.29 0.4 0.8515 

2 0.285 0.395 0.8494 

3 0.29 0.4 0.8515 

Average: 0.8508 

"B" Side Caiibration 

Run Number P std P s CP 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(indies H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.29 0.39 0.8623 

2 0.285 0.395 0.8494 

3 0.29 0.395 0.8568 

Average: 0.8562 

Deviation 

0.00068 

-0.00136 

0.00068 

Deviation 

0.00612 

-0.00677 

0.00065 

A & B Average = 0.8535 

0 oq- 
"A" Side Cafibration 

Run Number P std P s 

cm H20 cm H20 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.26 0.36 

2 0.25 0.35 

3 0.26 0.36 

Average: 

"8" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s 

cm H20 cm H20 

(inc,hes H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.253 0.355 

2 0.26 0.36 

3 0.265 0.365 

CP Deviation 

(S) 

0.8498 0.00156 

0.8452 -0.00312 

0.8498 0.00156 

0.8483 

CP Deviation 

(S) 

0.8475 -0.00228 

0.8498 0.00002 

0.8521 0.00226 

American Environmentai Testing. Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identification Number. 8' - C Date: 9/20/95 

Calibrated By. RB RH 

A & B Average = 0.8490 

Average: 0.8498 

~ 
"A" Side Caiibration 

Run Number P std P s 

cm H20 cm H20 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.36 0.51 

2 0.36 0.515 

3 0.3 5 S 0.505 

Average: 

"B" Side Caiibration 

Run Number P std P s 

cm H20 cm H20 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.365 0.52 

2 0.37 0.525 

3 0.375 0.53 

Average: 

CP Deviation 

(S) 

0.8402 0.00194 

0.8361 -0.00215 

0.8384 0.00021 

Ce". f*A 

CP Deviation 

(S) 

0.8378 -0.00168 

0.8395 0.00001 

0.8412 0.00167 

COR-1*l~~ 

American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identification Number. 11' - A Date:9/29/95 

Caiibrated Bv: TBB-VBB 

A & B Average = 0.8389 

n )l 
American Environmentai Testing Company, Inc. 

565 Sauth Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identification Number: 11' - B 

Calibrated By: TBB - JPB 

"A" Side Caiibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.31 0.45 0.8300 

2 0.31 0.45 0.8300 

3 0.3 0.44 0.8257 

. Average: 0.8286 

"B" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.3 0.44 0.82S7 

2 0.3 0.45 0.8165 

3 0.31 0.45 0.8300 

Average: 0.8241 

9/2/95 

Deviation 

0.00142 

0.00142 

-0.00285 

Deviation 

0.00165 

-O.00T57 

0.00592 

A & B Average = 0.8263 

~~ 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identification Number. 6' - A Date: 9/2!95 

C?librated By: VBB - tbb 

"A" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.31 0.47 0.8121 -0.00290 

2 0.32 0.48 0.8165 0.00145 

3 0.32 0.48 0.8165 0.00145 

Average: 0.8150 

"B" Side Caiibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.32 0.48 0.8165 0.00558 

2 0.32 0.49 0.8081 -0.00279 

3 0.32 0.49 0.8081 -0.00279 

Average: 0.8109 

A & B Average = 0.8130 

9~ 
American Environmentai Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-711 1 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identification Number. 6' - B 

Calibrated By- VBB - rbb 

"A" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s CP 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.31 0.43 0.8491 

2 0.31 0.43 0.8491 

3 0.31 0.43 0.8491 

Average: 0.8491 

"B" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.32 0.45 0.8433 

2 0.31 0.43 0.8491 

3 0.31 0.42 0.8591 

Average: 0.8505 

~~~Ils~•1F~ 

Deviation 

~ •~~~• 

re99 ~ 

Deviation 

-0.00722 

-0.00142 

0.00863 

A & B Average = 0.8498 

-72 
American Environmentai Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 2606 -71 1 1 

Pitot Tube Caiibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identification Number: 6' - T Date: 9/28/95 

Calibrated By: R8B - JPS 

"A" Side CaGbration 

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.29 0.42 0.8309 -0.00288 

2 0.3 0.43 0.8353 0.00144 

3 0.3 0.43 0.8353 0.00144 

Average: 0.8338 

"8" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.295 0.43 0.8283 -0.00306 

2 0.3 0.435 0.8305 -0.00088 

3 0.3 0.43 0.8353 0.00393 

Average: 0.8313 

A & B Average - 0.8326 

~~ 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identificaticn Numbs 6' - 0 

Calibrated By: VBB - JDS 

"A" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s 

cm H20 cm H20 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.28 0.37 

2 0.28 0.375 

3 0.29 0.38 

Average: 

"8" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s 

cm H20 cm H20 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.28 0.375 

2 0.28 0.38 

3 0.275 0.37 

Average: 

Date: 9/30/95 

Cp Deviation 

(S) 

0.8699 0.00072 

0.8641 -0.00510 

0.8736 0.00439 

0.8692 

CP Deviation 

(S) 

0.8641 0.00256 

0.8584 -0.00314 

0.8621 0.00058 

0.8615 

A & B Average = 0.8654 

~9 
"A" Side Caiibration 

Run Number P std P s 

cm H20 cm H20 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.3 0.47 

2 0.3 0.47 

3 0.3 0.46 

Average: 

"B" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s 

cm H20 cm H20 

(incties H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.31 0.47 

2 0.3 0.47 

3 0.31 0.47 

CP Deviation 

(S) 

0.7989 -0.00288 

0.7989 -0.00288 

0.8076 0.00576 

0.8018 

CP Deviation 

(S) 

0.8121 0.00440 

0.7989 -0.00880 

0.8121 0.00440 

American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

P9tot Tube Identification Number: 4' - A Date: 9/2/95 

Calibrated By: VBB - rbb 

A& B Average s 0.8048 

Average: 0.8077 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identification Number. 4' - B Date: 9/30/95 

Calibrated Bv: VBB-TBB 

"A" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.36 0.475 0.8706 -0.00062 

2 0.355 0.46 0.8785 0.00730 

3 0.355 0.475 0.8645 -0.00668 

. Average: 0.8712 

"B" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation 

cm H20 crn H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inc.hes H20) 

1 0.365 0.485 0.8675 0.00596 

2 0.36 0.49 0.8571 -0.00441 

3 0.355 0.48 0.8600 -0.00156 

Average: 0.8615 

A & 8 Average - 0.8664 

I 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identification Number 4' - C Qate: 9/30/95 

Calibrated By: VB RBB 

"A" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.36 0.495 0.8528 -0.00053 

2 0.365 0.5 0.8544 0.00107 

3 0.36 0.495 0.8528 -0.00053 

Average: 0.8533 

"B" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s CP Deviation 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.36 0.5 0.8485 -0.00087 

2 0.355 0.495 0.8469 -0.00254 

3 0.36 0.495 0.8528 0.00341 

Average: 0.8494 

A & B Average = 0.8514 

m 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identifrcation Number. 4' - T 

Caiibrated Bv: JPB - JPH 

"A" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s 

cm H20 cm H20 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.37 0.49 

2 0.38 0.5 

3 0.37 0.495 

_ Average: 

"B" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s 

cm H20 cm H20 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.365 0.48 

2 0.37 0.49 

3 0.37 0.485 

Average: 

Date:9/30/95 

Ca Deviation 

(S) 

0.8690 0.00053 

0.8718 0.00334 

0.8646 -0.00387 

0.8684 

CP Deviation 

(S) 

0.8720 0.00055 

0.8690 -0.00251 

0.8.734 0.00196 

0.8715 

A & 8 Average = 0.8700 

rpm c 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111 

Stack Temperature Sensor Calibration Form 

Thermocoupie Number- #1 Diaital -# 2 Omega Date: 3/3/95 

Barometric Pressure: 25.73 

eaiibrated Bv JDS - RPH Reference: ERTCO - Mg - Giass 

Reference Point Source a Reference Thermocouple Temperature 

Number (specffy) Thermometer Potentiometer Difference b 

Temperature °F Temperature °F °r6 

a) Ice Water 34 35 -0.33 

#1 b) Hot H20 140 141 -0.24 

Digital c) Boiiing H20 21 S 214 0.20 

d) Warm Oil 254 255 -0.19 

e) Hot Oii 398 396 0.30 

- • f) Boiling Oil 398 401 -0.45 

a) Ice Water 35 36 -0.32 

#2 b) Hot H20 146 148 -0.48 

Omega c) Boiiing H20 204 202 0.42 

d) Warm Oi( 233 235 -0.40 

e) Hot Oil 378 375 0.46 

f) Boiiing Oil 372 370 0.31 

a Type of caiibration system used. 

b(reference temp. °C + 273) -(test thermometer temp. °C + 273) * 100< 1.5% 

reference temperature °C + 273 

~k 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111 

Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibraticn Form 

Sample Box Number. CR##1A - UT #1A - RAC #1A-R.4C #2A Qate: 3/3/95 

Barometric Pressure: 25.59 

Caiibrated By: VBB - JPB Reference: ERTCO - 105 - SNBS 

Reference Point Source a Reference Thermocoupie Temperature 

Number (specify) Thermometer Potentiometer Difference b 

Temperature °F Temperature °F % 

3 Oven On 250 251 -0.19 

CR 4 Oven On 244 247 -0.58 

#1 A 2 Oven On 236 234 0.39 

1 Cold H20 54 55 -0.31 

8 Oven On 57 56 0.30 

_ 7 Oven On 59 58 0.30 

3 Oven On 247 246 0.19 

UTA 4 Oven On 243 244 -0.19 

#1 A 2 Oven On 239 240 -0.20 

1 Cold H20 46 47 -0.31 

8 Oven On 55 57 -0.61 

7 Oven On 61 60 0.30 

3 Oven On 244 243 0.19 

RAC 4 Oven On 254 255 -0.19 

#1 A 2 Oven On 236 237 -0.20 

1 Cold H20 56 57 -0.30 

8 Oven On 60 61 -0.30 

7 Oven On 63 62 0.30 

3 Oven On 241 244 -0.58 

RAC 4 Oven On 244 241 0.58 

#2A 2 Oven On 20 240 -75.09 

1 Cold H20 54 55 -0.31 

8 Oven On 5.3 55 -0.61 

7 Oven On 61 60 0.30 

a Type of calibration system used. 

b(reference temp. °C + 273) -(test thermometer temp. °C + 273) * 100< 1.5°6 

reference temperature °C + 273 

A5 x 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 11 

Balance Calibration Data Form 

Baiancs Name: Ohaus GA - 200 S2 (AnalYticai) Number : 1292 

Baiance Name: Mettler - BB - 3000 (Too Loader) Number : K6888 

c7assificatfon of Standard Weights: Swe "S" W.B.S. Analvst: JDS 

A 200 S Ohaus GA - 200 S2 

Date 0.500 g 1.0000 g 10.000(,La 50.0000 a 100.0000 a 

3/2/94 0.500 1.0001 10.0001 50-0002 100.0002 

9/6/94 0.500 1.0000 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 

3/3/95 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0000 100.0000 

9/22/95 0.50001 0.9999 10.0001 49.9998 

U 3600 Mettfer - BB - 3000 

Date 0.500 g 1.0000 a 10.0000 a 50.0000 a 100.0000 a 

3/2/94 0.5 1.0 10.0 50.1 100.1 

9/6/94 0.5010 1.0001 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000 

3/3/95 0.5000 1.0001 10.0000 50.0000 100.0001 
Appendix "C" 

(Production Data) 

c4mF2ican Envi.zonmzntaf gE=tin9 ~fom#any -Ync. 

cReno, cNevac'a 9-D40enix, c4tlzona cSaCt -fake eiEy, Q ~ta~ 

702- 786- 8553 602-253-3354 8o -266-7111 
Appendix "C" 

(Production Data) 
(I I NTERSTATE B RI CK 

,qgW 9780 South 5200 West 

West Jordan, Utah 84088-5689 

(807 ) 280-5200 

800/233-8654 (NAT'L) 

800;233-1244 (UTAH) 

(801) 280-5220 FAX 

Fax Transmission 

no. pa-zes including t11is page: 

To: Brent Benson, Ameiican Environmental Testing 

Fax no./phone no.: 491-9111 1, 266-7111 

Date: 10115195 

From: John Hewitt, 280-52$7 

CC: 

Subject: Interstate 'spr i;:'c Production on Kiln 3 for compliance testing 

10/31/95. 

For the compliance test the kiln speed ~~ as :~::reased to 18 cars per dav, the current maximum 

production rate of the la1n. During the test the nred -vare loading on the kiin was 26,4681b/hr. of 

fired ware (18 cars/day x 3.891b/brick x 9072 brickiccr ;. 1 day/24 hr.). The stack testing was 

therefore done at 100 1,'% production of the ltiln. 

The tvpe of brick going throu_h the k7ln during the test was: Zinfandel, 1lrlountain Red Nfrx, 

Fidvantage size and Canyon Rose, Canyon Rose Msx, Advantage size. 

On Monday 10/30/95 the ld.in put out a total of 15 cars of fred brick (increasing the push rate 

from 11 to 16 cars over the 24 hr. period from 7:15 a.m. to 7:15 a.m.) On Tuesday 10/30/95 at 

7:15am the push rate was increased from 16 to 18 cars per day. This rate was maiatained until 

from 7:15am until 8:35 p.m. at which time aIl testing was completed. Affter the testing was 

completed the kaln push rate was lowered to 16 cars per day. On Wednesday 11/1/95 the rate was 

dropped to 10 cars per day. 

The maximum capacity of the kiln (at preserrt wrthout modification) in terms of kilri cars per day 

is 18. Due to business canditions and biick sales the plant has been reduced from a 2 shifft to a 1 

shift operation in terms of manufacturing brick to be fired. As a result the kiln has been slowed to 

an 11 ldln car per day production rate. Barri.ng any unforeseen production problems, at this tirne 

the Idln mairrtains an 11 cars per day push rate and outputs 11 cars per day. 

v i . " .J ~ _ . r'' : ~I'. -. . ~ 'C COAST 

k:.. ~ pr0'u~ 

AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT 

1 Plant Interstate Brick 

2 Gty West Jordan 

3 Location #3 Kiln Inlet Stack 

4 Operator Rick Hawkins 

5 Date 10/31-95 

6 Stack Diameter (in) 54.16 

7 Sample Box Number UT #1 

8 Meter Box Number UT 790-484 

9 Meter AH@ 1.719 

10 Meter Calibration, Y 0.985 

11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8696 

12 Probe Length (ft) 8'-A 

13 Probe Liner Material Stainless 

14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248 

15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 55 

16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.41 

17 Assumed Moisture (%) 3 

18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.18 

19 C Factor 0 

20 Reference ^P (in H20) 0.3 

21 Nozzle Identification Number 5/1640 

22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.312 

23 Thermometer Number 1-A 

24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0050 

25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 19.5 

26 Filter Number 1-1 

27 Gas Analysis 

28 CO (°r6) 0 

29 CO2 3.50 

30 02 (%) 14.60 

31 N2 (%) 81.90 

~ 
ISOKINETIC AH 

AH = 0.9297 

constant 849.8000 

AH@ 1.0000 

Mds 29.1440 

Mm 29.1440 

K 3.0989 

AP 0.3000 

AH = 0.9297 

~7~ • . 

NOZZLE DIAMETER 

Dn = 0.312 

constant 0.0357 

Qm 0.75 

Pb(in HG) 25.41 

Pgm(in H20) -0.18 

Pm 25.3968 

Cp 0.8696 

Tm(°F) 80 

Tm(°R) 540 

Bwm 0 

Bws 0.03 

Ts(°F) 550 

Ts(-R) 1010 

Mds 29.144 

Ms 28.8097 

Pb(in HG) 25.41 

Pgs(in H20) -0.18 

Ps 25.3968 

(AP)avg 0.3 

Dn = 0.2992 

PRETEST DATA 

Cp 0.8696 

Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 

Gel H20(g) 12.0000 

V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 

Vm(acfl 49.2300 

Ah avg 0.2000 

Vwc 6.0155 

Vmc 40.2742 

Bws = 0.1300 
Sample 

Point 

starting 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

Meter Meter Stack 

Temperature Temperature Temp 

Outlet Inlet Ts 

(-F) (°F) ('F) 

66 66 535 

67 77 537 

66 81 538 

69 89 539 

67 91 540 

69 79 532 

70 89 537 

71 97 545 

72 103 551 

73 106 551 

76 82 540 

75 89 555 

76 98 556 

77 105 556 

78 112 560 

80 85 549 

81 99 556 

82 106 555 

83 110 549 

84 118 542 

Gas 

Volume 

Vm 

(ft3) 

920.352 

922.58 

924.96 

927.5 

930.16 

932.53 

934.71 

937.3 

939.99 

942.64 

945.03 

947.34 

949.71 

952.2 

954.85 

957.59 

959.82 

962.12 

964.65 

967.26 

969.882 

Gas 

Volume 

difference 

(ft3) 

2.23 

2.38 

2.54 

2.66 

2.37 

2.18 

2.59 

2.69 

2.65 

2.39 

2.31 

2.37 

2.49 

2.65 

2.74 

2.23 

2.30 

2.53 

2.61 

2.62 

avg °F 

avg "R 

total = 

average = 74.10 

Sample Meter 

Point Temperature 

Inlet (°F) 

84.10 

544.10 

94.10 

Meter 

Temperature 

Outlet (°F) 

546.15 

1006.15 

546.15 

Stack 

Temp (°F) 

T 

49.5300 49.53 

Gas Gas 

Volume Volume 

Vm Vm 

9~ 
Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling C1ock Vacuum 

Head Diff APs Time Time 

nPs nH 

(in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 

1320 

0.24 1.26 0.4899 3 1323 1.2 

0.28 1.49 0.5292 3 1326 1.4 

0.31 1.65 0.5568 3 1329 1.6 

0.33 1.77 0.5745 3 1332 1.7 

0.29 1.56 0.5385 3 1335 1.5 

0.25 1.34 0.5000 3 1340 1.2 

0.31 1.67 0.5568 3 1343 1.6 

0.33 1.78 0.5745 3 1346 1.7 

0.32 1.73 0.5657 3 1349 1.7 

0.26 1.41 0.5099 3 1352 1.5 

0.26 1.40 0.5099 3 1355 1.5 

0.27 1.44 0.5196 3 1358 1.5 

0.3 1.61 0.5477 3 1401 1.8 

0.33 1.78 0.5745 3 1404 1.8 

0.35 1.90 0.5916 3 1407 2 

0.24 1.28 0.4899 3 1410 1.7 

0.25 1.35 0.5000 3 1413 1.8 

0.29 1.58 0.5385 3 1416 2 

0.31 1.70 0.5568 3 1419 2.1 

0.32 1.78 0.5657 3 1422 2.2 

60 60 

0.2920 1.5734 0.5395 3 1369 1.67 

Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff APs Time Time 

^Ps ^H 

-1~ 
Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to 

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point 

Eadt Outlet Isoldnetics 

(°F) ('F) ('F) 

247 245 50 42.7860 109.14 

250 253 47 46.2606 106.97 

252 259 46 48.7002 108.32 

256 258 45 50.2718 108.99 

250 262 44 47.1502 103.58 

252 264 44 43.6024 103.03 

250 260 44 48.6758 109.25 

248 268 46 50.4226 109.60 

250 266 46 49.8007 109.30 

250 268 47 44.8897 108.90 

247 261 48 44.6449 106.57 

246 258 48 45.8353 107.55 

244 259 50 48.3384 106.39 

249 256 51 50.6978 107.27 

251 259 51 52.3141 107.22 

253 266 52 43.0860 106.88 

255 265 52 44.1267 107.03 

250 267 51 47.5025 108.59 

252 264 51 48.9679 107.61 

247 260 51 49.5785 105.26 

249.95 

Probe Exit 

Temperature (oF) 

249.95 

Filter 

Temperature 

('F) 

48.20 

Outlet Impinger 

Temperature 

('F) 

W 
")ST TEST CALCULATIO 

VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT 

Vm(std) = 40.3740 Vw(std) = 2.9419 Bws = 0.0679 

Vm 49.5300 Vic(mis) 62.5 

Vm(std) = 40.3740 Vw(std) = 2.9419 

-.C:C GASE: STACK VELOCITY DRY STACK FLOW RATE 

Vs = 47.3 80 5 

Mds = 29.1440 Q(std) = 1.1330E+6 

Kp 85.49 

MOL WT WET STACK GASE: Vs = 47.3805 

Mws = 28.3871 

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION 

An = 5.3093E-4 

% ISO = 107.4240 

Initial Leak Check Rate 

Finish 919.859 Pitot Tubes 

Start 919.854 A = OK 

Rate = 0.0050 B = OK 

Vac. = 19.5 

Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes 

Finish 970.021 99 

Start 970.015 B = OK 

Rate = 0.0060 

Vac. = 17.8 

PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION 

Cs = 6.2912E-4 

Mn 25.4 

Cs = 6.2912E-4 

Ibs/dscf = 1.3869E-6 

grains/dscf = 0.0097 

lbs/hr = 1.5714 

NOx 

PPM = 79.07 

Ibs/hr = 10.697 

CO 

PPM = 455.62 

Ibs/hr = 37.581 

S02 

PPM = 125.63 

lbs/hr = 23.628 

HF 

mg/dscf = 7.999 

Ibs/hr = 25.51 

Q~ 
,Amf--.ican EnvircnrnQr;tal Testina Ccmflany, lnc_ 

S6Z So uth clrch D rivQ 

Spanisn For'~ Utah 34Eo0 

(801) 2F.8-7111 

L..kB O RAT 0 FsY D ATA 

E.`~A MCt,7Ld v 

Cosr~any: ~ ~, /L71 L y- ✓ ~ ~ .r ~.~ Run Num~ef: r 7S` , 

Samplirg Loc3tion:'~ 3 ~~2-?~_ ,~'-~-~ Date: /O 

Mkistur2 CQfiected 

lnit!a! Weicht Final 4;leicnt Weight Cain 

lmpir.SQr 1 6-36 'y. 8" 

Impinger 2 %~• y ~ O~ . S ~~ 

lmpinSer 3 S L/. O ~"OS ,-Z 

ImpiNer 4 ~3a. ~ f SiC~ • ,~ ~ % 

Tctal Cain = ~ 

P3rtScutate Caller-:ed 

Frnnt - Anatysis (Nczz'e, Frcb-e, Fiitc-r ard Oyen Glazs -ware) 

1. Filter FinalWeight 

2. Fitter Tare WeiSnt 

3. Total Fiiter wleicl'rt 

4. Particulate c3ught in 

noz: .Ie, prcbe and giaszware 

S. Tctal Frront -1-;a1! Catch 

© . E c~ 5—,3 

-a- 6/y -7 

C . Oi3Z 

& Oioc) 

~?. o-:~ 3E 

Eac:c - Hatf Aralysis (lmpinser3, ard Connec:ir.g Cli:zsware) 

1. Parcfcuiate caught in imPinc,er3 

ey aperated dcwn at lesz than 

120' F. _ m 

Total Particulate Catch (Sum ct Ftcnt and 8ack - Natt Catc; -ks) 

_. ., 

.._ . . ... ._ .._._.-.~ 

~~ 
American Environmenta! Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 

(801) 255-7111 

Company: -a r lc 1L Date: 

Soures: jt ~ JVA Run Number: ~ I 

ORSAT ANALYSiS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry 

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Carbon 

Dixoide Monoxide 

, 

~i ~ •e XJ ~~ ~ \ r I 

Average 

r 

Rl 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT 

1 Plant Interstate Brick 

2 Gty West Jordan 

3 Location #3 Kiln Inlet Stack Run #2 

4 Operator Rick Hawkins 

5 Date 10/31-95 

6 

~ 

Stack Diameter (in) 54.16 

7 Sample Box Number UT #1 

8 Meter Box Number UT 790-484 

9 Meter AH@ 1.719 

10 Meter Calibration, Y 0.985 

11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8696 

12 Probe Length (ft) 8'-A 

13 Probe Liner Material Stainless 

14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248 

15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 48 

16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.34 

17 Assumed Moisture (°r6) 8 

18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.18 

19 C Factor 0 

20 Reference AP (in H20) 0.3 

21 Nozzle Identification Number 5/1640 

22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.312 

23 Thermometer Number 1-A 

24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0050 

25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 18.5 

26 Filter Number 1-2 

27 Gas Analysis 

28 CO (%) 0 

29 CO2 (°r6) 3.70 

30 02 (%) 14.30 

31 N2 (%) 82.00 

W// 
.. ~ mo 

NOZZLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH 

Dn = 0.312 AH = 0.8528 

constant 0.0357 

Qm 0.75 

Pb(in HG) 25.34 

Pgm(in H20) -0.18 

Pm 25.3268 

Cp 0.8696 

Tm(°F) 80 

Tm(°R) 540 

Bwm 0 

Bws 0.08 

Ts(°F) 550 

Ts(°R) 1010 

Mds 29.164 

Ms 28.2709 

Pb(in HG) 25.34 

Pgs(in H20) -0.18 

Ps 25.3268 

(AP)avg 0.3 

Dn = 0.2977 

Cp 0.8696 

Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 

Gel H20(g) 12.0000 

V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 

Vm(acf) 49.2300 

Ah avg 0.2000 

Vwc 6.0155 

Vmc 40.1633 

Bws = 0.1303 

constant 849.8000 

AH@ 1.0000 

Mds 29.1640 

Mm 29.1640 

K 2.8427 

AP 0.3000 

AH = 0.8528 

A~ 
Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume 

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference 

(°F) ('F) ('F) (ft3) (ft3) 

starting 970.852 

1 69 69 542 973.03 2.18 

2 69 76 547 975.29 2.26 

3 70 84 550 977.62 2.33 

4 70 89 549 980.06 2.44 

5 70 94 550 982.28 2.22 

6 71 85 544 984.47 2.19 

7 71 92 544 986.86 2.39 

8 72 103 552 989.32 2.46 

9 72 109 551 991.73 2.41 

10 72 114 538 993.98 2.25 

11 74 85 505 996.35 2.37 

12 73 91 509 998.65 2.30 

13 74 95 512 1001.09 2.44 

14 75 104 513 1003.66 2.57 

15 76 109 518 1006.2 2.54 

16 78 91 522 1008.5 2.30 

17 .77 95 526 1010.75 2.25 

18 78 98 525 1013 2.25 

19 78 105 536 1015.44 2.44 

20 78 113 536 1017.842 2.40 

avg °F 84.20 533.45 

avg °R 544.20 993.45 

total = 46.9900 46.99 

average = 73.35 95.05 533.45 

Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume 

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm 

ON 
Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff ^Ps Time Time 

APs AH 

(in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 

1630 

0.23 1.11 0.4796 3 1633 1.9 

0.25 1.21 0.5000 3 1636 2 

0.28 1.36 0.5292 3 1639 2.1 

0.31 1.51 0.5568 3 1642 2.2 

0.25 1.23 0.5000 3 1645 2 

0.24 1.17 0.4899 3 1650 1.9 

0.29 1.43 0.5385 3 1653 2.1 

0.32 1.58 0.5657 3 1656 2.2 

0.29 1.44 0.5385 3 1659 2.1 

0.24 1.21 0.4899 3 1702 2 

0.26 1.33 0.5099 3 1706 2.2 

0.25 1.28 0.5000 3 1709 2.1 

0.29 1.48 0.5385 3 1712 2.4 

0.33 1.70 0.5745 3 1715 2.6 

0.32 1.65 0.5657 3 1718 2.6 

0.24 1.22 0.4899 3 1722 2.2 

0.24 1.21 0.4899 3 1725 2.2 

0.28 1.42 0.5292 3 1728 2.4 

0.3 1.52 0.5477 3 1731 2.5 

0.27 1.38 0.5196 3 1734 2.4 

60 60 

0.2740 1.3724 0.5226 3 1685.75 2.21 

Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff APs Time Time 

APs AH 

irol 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1 

Balance Caiibration Data Form 

Balance Name: Satorius - A 200 S(Analytical) Number : 35120053 

Balance Name: Satorius - U3600 (Top Loader) Number : 35120087 

Classification of Standard Weights: Tvoe "S" W.B.S. Analvst: JPB - RH 

A200S 

Date 0.500 g 1.0000 g 10.0000 g 50.0000 g 100.0000 ca 

3/2/94 0.500 0.9999 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 

9/6/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000 

3/3/95 0.5000 1.0001 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 

9/2%95 0.5 1.0001 10 50 

U 3600 

Date 0.50Q a 1.0000 a 10.0000 g 50.0000 a 100.0000 g 

3/2/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.1000 

9/6/94 0.501 1.0010 10.0000 50.0001 100.0001 

3/3/95 0.5000 1.00 10.00 50.00 100.00 

~~ d 
R;,-.* 

E-.0 

Al x~•- .; -I-, - . -,;; t 0z; I iz 

^~l ~~c~ ~ 

SPSCIALTY G"AS" DIVISs'CN 

.11711 S. AlaMeda Street 

p iLos Angeles, CA 90059 

~ 64-57,11. 

ANALYTICAL REPORT- PRCOUCTC RTIFICATION 

TO: Mountain Air' gas DATZ: 31., An 1994 

P~ 

• 

-.'tPA Pr* otocol Procedure G-1 

CYLINCEIR NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL 

CC104478 Nitric ox ide 50.0 PPM 53..1 FFM 

NOX 53. 4 PPM 

Nitrogen Balance Balance 

CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 24 

EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1996 

cylinde rPressure: 2000 - psig.. 

.7-Do'—not uie below lcu- ps-, g 

• 

William L. Vernon 

ML i 

AN 

1~ 3 
ry 

9~ G 

SPECIALTY G;%S DIVISION 

_EZ 

11711 S. Alarn-da Street 

Los•Ange'es. ~.A 900!9 

ANALYTiCAL RE'PORT - PRODUCT CER-TIFICAT(ON .0 

TO: Mountain Airgas LvAtz: 3 'i994 

p.0 

EPA Protocol Procedure G-1 

CYLINDER NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL 

CCl0514 sulfur Dioxi!de 850 PPM 901.6 Ppm .0 

Nitrogen Balance Bal ance 

CERTIFICATION PERrOD (months): 36 

EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1997 

Cylinder Pressure'. 2000 psig 

Do not use-below. 130 pzia. 

i~~= ': 

Z] 

--T 

ANALYST 

William L. trernon 

x 

~fj! 7 

I -; t ~, .~n. 

7 

-4- 

-),I 
v~~~~ SPECIALTY GAS DIVISIO N 

11 711 S. Alameda Street • 

Los Angeles. CA 90059 

(213) 564-5711 

-ANALYTICALREPORT PRODUCT CF-r"RTIFICATION 

TO,:''M .otm.tain Airgas DATE: 31 Jan 1994 

P.0 NO: 005422..'. 

ZEPA Protocol Procedure G-1 

-C 

CYLINDER NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL 

!CC104484 Sulfur Dioxide 500 PPM 514. 6 PP14 

Nitrogen Balance Balance 

CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 36 

EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1997 

Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig 

'Da not uze••below-150 psig 

Ec-- 

♦ 

❑ ~ 

0, ri, 

-WW. 

William L. ANALYST 

Vernon 7 

~.A 
11 

, -) - , - v m J~ -) , -0"- - - I - - 1- '? 1;1. , r-. 

-21 

` ~ ~OC~~ SPSCIALTY GAS DIVISION 

11 71 1 S. Alameda Street 

LaS Angeles. CA 90059 

(213) 56•-571 1 

ANALYTICAL REPORT - PRODUCT CERTIFICATION 

TO: Mountain Airgas DATE: 31 J' 1994 n 

NO: 0 0. 5 a 

A 

.EPA Protocol Procedure G-1 

CYLINDEFt NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL 

CC104461 Nitric Oxi-de 85.0 PPM 86.8 PPM 

NOX 87.3 PPM 

Nitrogen Balance Balance 

3~ ~9 

CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 24 

EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1996 77 

-Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig 

Do not use below 150 psig 

15 

-35 

William L. Vernon 

R r- . ENT.N-S,111-1 
~~. . 

~ 

~~• 

'': /•s~ ,- ~Q 

..•~~f~ 

1..•+~

!..~ O 

_i 

I'•_ ~~t 

~ — _ •...: i 

_ 

a 

s 

Tw~~~r • ..:ry.. ~~v : • i. 

~ 

. ~ . .. ~. _.Y...y.._.r._ v.,_ lwtl n) ~l'R1vlTl '9 ~., an..l+n. •~ 

~ .iwf. • v n _ v.-_Y• .•/r,. ... ....... . . ~~_m).'. ~ a). ~ .n_ ~ 7 ~ i^.n ~w+ •-~ Y/' ._ v. . .• ..r. . _. . .. _ 

[M,l( R ,4 (l.f 'i°n ~~n •).N. ~~.)'ii>.`y1./~~7., ' 1 ~ ^ t_ ~. ,yl,`T . ' 

~~'.~ : ~~~.~~i ~~' :~ Yt. ~i ~~ ~~~1 •M, Y ~ A/• 1 ~ •1~'•' ~~.'I • ~:'~ ~'r; /r.• `' r\r~l r~Ip' •F• •N~S ~M •'~•1 

1_ 

1 ~?•,~~ ~M' .,•`•-'.u~~;.~~• ,Nli~~••~jw •~ ~4 . ) . ..r• Yi 

1'\•• r' ► .I ~I ~ 'l~.c~~...~J~.~l_.~J...L~1.-.~.~..E'~:L~1-.+'ei..:t~i-~1~+~:~~-t~i~...'.5:... ~`• 1D' ' ' ~aJ}-y ~ ::r__• ~.e~~.e-i-`~` tta'~:E~..:2i-+`ca1::~'~1~..'Z'Q't~,~?:_:c . - • ; 

Sp ~ C3AL TY t ~ • GAS DIVISiON - i 

t 1 i 7' 1 S. ~tlarneda Street 

C 

l.o°, Angeies. CA 90059 

 

,.~ ..N,. 

~! 

:-p~ . • 

ANALYTICAL REPORT - PRODUCTCER T iFICATi0N 

~ 

• 

~~ TO: Mountain Airgas 

~ •w.. ~

' 

DAT'1~ : 

- 

31 ,Jan 1994 

r 

P. O. NO . 0 QS 4 2 2- 

~ 

rJ ... ' , • - tN EPA Protocol Procedure 0-1 ~ 

. _ 

w 

— 

~ 

CYLINDER NO. L;;.~ONSTITl1ENTS CONCE~VTRATION: NOMINAL - ACTUAL 

-- CC15584 Carbon.Monoxide 60.0 PPM 62..7 P,PM 

- Nitrogen Balance Balance 

~ •+i 

~ 

y ' 

r 

( 

CERTIFICATION PERIOD (monchs): 36 

EYPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1997 

Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig 

Do not' use below 150 - psig 

1 

i~ 

,''r'_'~ , ' ' ~ , ~ i v• r`~ 

~ 

'..'1"i~- . 

r- , . 

• • , ~ , `, . . . . 

^~- • '~ . . 

l , 

~ ' . • . 

,: •4 • 

. . 

.-• , • ... - . 

a 

~ r 

:•^ ~' 

- t ~ 

_ ANALYST 

". William L. Vernon 

~ I 

~ ::~ia ii .~1 ~ . !•. i ~a ~ a 'a ~Y3► i.v 

':1~V:iW ~~a o 4{a W~ . ~ a acW:: .. !i l: i ~ : .ii ~ • a :: ~//~a~:a ac .ia 

`~ •.J' )r+ . ~"'~~" ~N ~~• w' iW' ~ .y" iw'' e.,' eny' iw w' ~ w' ~ w" !ny' InY" 1N ...l.w ~ 1d". ~ wy " ~ ~~- ~p+~ Ly~ ~ ny' ~ N"iWia 

~..•~.n ~Vrr ~..Ilrrl/rur,b.r.'!~rr/!~u,!bvlf~o~.v!ti,.,~'...,!'•,., ~f+•..?~ul~ .•f•s.rr ~/lu.!1r.s.!~u•a~

•,i.!r...!h r.!b..!ti ~ !b...!lru.!r...!1u 

~ .. ~ .1 

i 

;.~ ; 
SPErWIALTY GAS DIVISION 

11711 S. Alameda Street 

Los Angeles. CA 90059 

(213)564-5711 

Z— 

ANALYTICAL REPORT - PROOUCT CERTIFiCATION 

TO:Mountain Airgas DATE: 31 Jan 1994 

..P.O. -005422 

EPA Protocol Procedure G-1 

CYLINOEA NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCZ.NITRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL 

CC15577 Carbon Monoxide 30.0 PPM 32.4 PPM 

Nitrogen Balance Balance 

CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 36 

EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1997 

Zylinder Pressure: 2000 Psig 

Do not use below 150 psig 

'7 

1;Z 

Will'iam L. 
Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to 

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point 

Exit Outlet Isokinetics 

(°F) (°F) ('F) 

248 251 45 42.0908 108.78 

251 256 46 43.9920 107.90 

247 256 48 46.6260 104.50 

250 260 48 49.0360 103.54 

247 264 49 44.0575 104.42 

244 267 50 43.0389 105.53 

248 262 50 47.3102 104.22 

256 260 51 49.8947 101.52 

256 262 48 47.4748 103.85 

259 256 49 42.9101 105.38 

249 259 47 43.9177 107.34 

249 258 47 43.1540 105.98 

250 261 48 46.5501 104.16 

252 261 47 49.6824 102.09 

250 258 47 49.0494 102.20 

244 261 45 42.5648 108.41 

250 259 46 42.6514 106.00 

252 262 46 46.0454 97.80 

254 266 46 47.9269 102.46 

256 265 47 45.4674 105.56 

250.6 250.6 47.50 

Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger 

Temperature Temperature Temperature 

(°F) (°F) ' ('F) 

/D ~ 
"'OST TEST _ CALCULATION 

VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT 

Vm(std) = 38.1693 Vw(std) = 2.8571 Bws = 0.0696 

Vm 46.9900 Vic(mis) 60.7 

Vm(std) = 38.1693 Vw(std) = 2.8571 

DRY STACK GASE: 

Mds = 29.1640 

MOL WT WET STACK GASE: 

Mws = 28.3865 

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION 

An = 5.3093E-4 

% ISO = 104.5039 

STACK VELOCITY 

Vs = 45.6738 

Kp 85.49 

Vs = 45.6738 

DRY STACK FLOW RATE 

Q(std) = 1.1011 E+6 

PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION 

Cs = 6.4188E-4 

Mn 24.5 

Cs = 6.4188E-4 

Ibs/dscf = 1.4151 E-6 

grains/dscf = 0.0099 

Ibs/hr = 1.5581 

NOx 

PPM = 77.52 

Ibs/hr = 10.191 

CO 

PPM = 445.38 

Ibs/hr = 35.700 

Initial Leak Check Rate 

Finish 970.528 Pitot Tubes 

Start 970.523 A = OK 

Rate = 0.0050 B = OK 

Vac. = 18.5 

Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes 

Finish 1017.995 99 

Start 1017.988 B = OK 

Rate = 0.0070 

Vac. = 18.6 

S02 

PPM = 147.92 

Ibs/hr = 27.036 

HF 

mg/dscf = 11.414 

Ibs/hr = 27.71 

II'D 
Ame..r;can Fnw3rcnmes;tal Testina Ccmpany, Inc_ 

,56Z Sc uth L' irc: ; D rive 

Spanish For!, , Utah 34650 

(801) 2E8-7111 

LUB40RA70F`t' DAT-A 

E PA ? ~e tfxd S 

Co rrpany: ~il-4~,~ ~C~ ~~ Run Number:2~-2 

Sampling Location: ~-3 r~~ ~~~ Date: /o -S i— S 

impiNer 1 

lmpincer 2 

lmpinCer 3 

lnit-~al Weight 

Nic i ature Co llec'ed 

Final Weicht 

5~ ~ - 

C, co ~ -CA 

Weight Catn 

---u-! — 

~ 6 

Irnpinc~r 4 ~0. ? , ~ Co ~ 2 ~P 

Tctal Cain = C~• ( 

lfartict:Eate Coile ~ed 

Front - 1--!aIf Ar2Iy3is (Ncz-fe, Prcbe, Fitter ard Oven GYazsware) 

1. Filter F1nai WeiSht 

2. Filter Tate Y+leight 

3. Total Fitter WeiCht 

4. PartScutate caught in 

r4zzle, prcts ard gfassware 

S. TotaI Frront - t-att Catch 

C~ C 3~37' / 

~ • 6~ /S'7 _L~— oZ 

, 

c'?, OoS5- 

, 

Eac'c - I-ialf Ar2ly3i3 (ImpinSerr, and Conrec:ing C12zsware) 

1. PartScuiate cau5ht in impinc,er3 

evaperated down at }es3 t1an 

120' F. I 3 _ 

Total Particulate Catch (Sum oI',.Frant and Eac:c - N2tt.Cat ~~ks) •___ _ -- - ~ --. . _. . ._.. . .... ..... _ ~- 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT 

1 Plant Interstate Brick 

2 Gty West Jordan 

3 Location #3 Kiln Inlet Stack Run #3 

4 Operator Rick Hawkins 

5 Date 10/31-95 

6 Stack Diameter (in) 54.16 

7 Sample Box Number (n #1 

8 Meter Box Number UT 790-484 

9 Meter AH@ 1,719 

10 Meter Calibration, Y 0.985 

11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8696 

12 Probe Length (ft) 8'-A 

13 Probe Liner Material Stainless 

14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248 

15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 44 

16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.3 

17 Assumed Moisture (%) 8 

18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.18 

19 C Factor 0 

20 Reference AP (in H20) 0.3 

21 Nozzle Identification Number 5/1640 

22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.312 

23 Thermometer Number 1-A 

24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0060 

25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 19,2 

26 Filter Number 1-3 

27 Gas Analysis 

28 CO (%) 0 

29 CO2 (%) 3.40 

30 02 (%) 14.90 

31 N2 (%) 81.70 

/l4 
NOZZLE DIAMETER 

Dn = 0.312 

constant 0.0357 

Qm 0.75 

Pb(in HG) 25.3 

Pgm(in H20) -0.18 

Pm 25.2868 

CP 0.8696 

Tm(°F) 80 

Tm(°R) 540 

Bwm 0 

Bws 0.08 

Ts(°F) 550 

Ts(°R) 1010 

Mds 29.14 

Ms 28.2488 

Pb(in HG) 25.3 

Pgs(in H20) -0.18 

Ps 25.2868 

(AP)avg 0.3 

Dn = 0.2975 

PRETEST CALCULATIONS 

PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH 

AH = 0.8528 

Cp 0.8696 constant 849.8000 

Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 AH@ 1.0000 

Gel H20(g) 12.0000 Mds 29.1400 

V(H20)(mi) 127.8000 Mm 29.1400 

Vm(acf) 49.2300 K 2.8426 

Ah avg 0.2000 AP 0.3000 

Vwc 6.0155 AH = 0.8528 

Vmc 40.0999 

Bws = 0.1304 
T 

Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume 

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference 

('F) ("F) ('F) (ft3) (ft3) 

starting 18.727 

1 70 70 510 20.87 2.14 

2 71 76 515 23.04 2.17 

3 71 81 542 25.42 2.38 

4 71 90 555 27.82 2.40 

5 72 95 559 30.08 2.26 

6 74 85 545 32.2 2.12 

7 73 92 558 34.51 2.31 

8 73 99 560 36.96 2.45 

9 74 108 557 39.4 2.44 

10 75 114 560 41.5 2.10 

11 78 100 520 43.77 2.27 

12 77 107 532 46.13 2.36 

13 77 111 540 48.54 2.41 

14 78 115 542 51.06 2.52 

15 78 120 550 53.53 2.47 

16 79 100 542 55.72 2.19 

17 80 110 544 57.96 2.24 

18 81 115 550 60.33 2.37 

19 81 121 552 62.79 2.46 

20 81 124 560 65.05 2.26 

avg °F 88.68 544.65 

avg °R 548.67 1004.65 

total = 46.3230 46.32 

average = 75.70 101.65 544.65 

Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume 

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm 

!lq 
Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff ^Ps Time Time 

APs AH 

; (in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 

1900 

0.22 1.10 0.4690 3 1903 2 

0.24 1.20 0.4899 3 1906 2.1 

0.29 1.42 0.5385 3 1909 2.4 

0.3 1.46 0.5477 3 1912 2.5 

0.26 1.27 0.5099 3 1915 2.4 

0.22 1.08 0.4690 3 1920 2.2 

0.28 1.36 0.5292 3 1923 2.4 

0.32 1.56 0.5657 3 1926 2.6 

. 0.3 1.48 0.5477 3 1929 2.5 

0.21 1.04 0.4583 3 1932 2.4 

0.25 1.28 0.5000 3 1936 2.6 

0.27 1.37 0.5196 3 1939 2.7 

0.3 1.52 0.5477 3 1942 2.8 

0.32 1.62 0.5657 3 1945 2.8 

0.3 1.52 0.5477 3 1948 2.7 

0.23 1.15 0.4796 3 1951 2.5 

0.25 1.26 0.5000 3 1954 2.5 

0.29 1.46 0.5385 3 1957 2.7 

0.31 1.57 0.5568 3 2000 2.8 

0.28 1.41 0.5292 3 2003 2.6 

60 60 

0.2720 1.3571 0.5205 3 1937.5 2.51 

Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff APs Time Time 

APs AH 

~ 

1~ 7 
Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to 

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point 

Exit Outlet Isokinetics 

(°F) (°F) (°F) 

247 251 48 40.5868 107.71 

250 256 47 42.5007 104.09 

252 265 47 47.3610 104.89 

250 264 46 48.4821 103.87 

255 266 46 45.2233 104.68 

249 264 45 41.3126 106.68 

248 260 45 46.9074 103.25 

244 259 45 50.1953 101.98 

245 257 46 48.5299 103.84 

248 255 48 40.6628 106.23 

251 258 49 43.4882 104.18 

257 261 50 45.4701 104.35 

255 260 50 48.1226 101.20 

254 266 51 49.7504 102.17 

254 267 51 48.3626 103.38 

253 265 52 42.1780 105.83 

250 259 54 44.0175 103.00 

254 260 54 47.5497 101.04 

251 260 52 49.2107 101.06 

257 261 51 46.9534 97.80 

251.2 251.2 48.85 

Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger 

Temperature Temperature Temperature 

(°F) (°F) (°F) 

`l6 
POST TEST CALCULATION 

VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT 

Vm(std) = 37.2603 Vw(std) = 2.9842 Bws = 0.0742 

Vm 46.3230 Vic(mis) 63.4 

Vm(std) = 37.2603 Vw(std) = 2.9842 

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE: STACK VELOCITY DRY STACK FLOW RATE 

Vs = 45.8357 

Mds = 29.1400 Q(std) = 1.0856E+6 

Kp 85.49 

MOL WT WET STACK GASE: Vs = 45.8357 

Mws = 28.3139 

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION 

An = 5.3093E-4 

% ISO = 103.4652 

Initial Leak Check Rate 

Finish 18.361 Pitot Tubes 

Start 18.355 A = OK 

Rate = 0.0060 B = OK 

Vac. = 19.2 

Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes 

Finish 65.167 99 

Start 65.162 B = OK 

Rate = 0.0050 

Vac. = 18.6 

PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION 

Cs = 6.1191 E-4 

Mn 22.8 

Cs = 6.1191 E-4 

Ibs/dscf = 1.3490E-6 

grains/dscf = 0.0094 

Ibs/hr = 1.4645 

NOx 

PPM = 82.06 

Ibs/hr = 10.637 

CO 

PPM = 444.65 

Ibs/hr = 35.142 

S02 

PPM = 148.33 

Ibs/hr = 26.731 

HF 

mg/dscf = 14.422 

Ibs/hr = 34.52 

//I 
American Env3rtrnrnentai Tes-Zina Ccmflany, lnc. 

5~ Scuth Birch Drive 

Spanish Fvrfc, Utah 34560 

(801) 2E5-7111 

LAH CRAT0 F3Y DAT.A 

E?A Mettxd m. 

Company: Pun Numcer: 

Sampiirx.~ Lac3tian: 1-5 /6A _~ Gate: /O 

Mc i sture Co iiec'£d 

lniiial Welcht FinaI Weicrt YVeicht Gain 

impir.er1 c, t) .~ 

Impirxer 2 

lmpincer 3 

impitiger 4 

Tcta 1 Ca in = 

T=~r,ic:.~ iate Ccil~-:ed 

Frcnt -}-'zlf Analy3is (Nczz!e, Prcba, Fiiter arw Cven Gtass -ware) 

SS 

1. Filter Final Weight 

2. Filter Tare WQiSht 

3. Total Fitter W$i5ht 

4. Particulate c3uc,ht in 

noz-Ve, prcce ard gtasswwe 

S. Total Frcrrt -1`alf Catc:i 

D-72v7, 

. 7f r, 7 

©.O ~ Yo 

O. oo ~ i 

Back -1-a1f Analysis (lmpin5er3, and Conr*c:ir:g Gtsswara), 

1. Partfcutate cau5;rt in impiracers 

evaperated c:own at less than 

12 a' F. 

Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and E,ac:c- Halr Catc: -Rs) 

. . ~.. .. 

~ 

aa. ~ 

.., 

//f 
AMERICAN E?dVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCJRPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 8C1-256-71 1 1 

Soanish Fork, Utah 8466C 

POST TEST BACIC HAL.c EVAPORATION 

COMPANY: ~h.~=~ ~ S""e 

SOURCE: 

DATE: l/- E - 

ACETONE BLANK WATER BLANK 

Volume ot Liquic o?.S L' 1-lz Volume of Liquic. 

Final Weight I06• 6/S2' Finai Weight I 

Tare Weight /GE Tare Weight 

Residue e' ooy/ Residue ~ 

' RUN #1 RUN 41 

Volume of Liquic r2S"© :~ Vofume of Liquic 

Color Color ~ 

Final Weight /0,6 J9 Final Weight 

Tare Weight ~~E ~~a'a7 Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank Residue & Blank 

- Blank 0 021 1\ - Blank + 

Residue /U•O Residue ! 

C~ O/O 0 ~-- 

RUN :12 RUN e2 

Voiume of Liquic ~ So •~ Volume of Liquic 

Coior Color ~ Final Weight /o ? • / 11-O % Final Weight 

Tare Weight Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank Residue & Blank 

- Blank C~ . oodi Blartk 

Residue Residue 

~ 

RUN #3 RUN a3 

Volume of Liquic as~' ~~ Volume of Liquic 

Coior Color 

Final Weight Final Weight 

Tare Weight /G 7. a? `/`/Y Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank O• Residue & Blank 

- Blank D• O0O% 1 — - Blank 

Residue ~ ` Residue 

 ----~ 

~~ 
American Environmenta! Testing Company, Inc56z South 8iroh Drive 

Spanish Fori, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

Company: ~vti f ~~~~ ~r1~~C Date: 

.-- f 

Source: ~ ~2t~' ~ ~~ Run Number: A -- _31 

QRSAT ANALYSIS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Yolume Percent - Dry 

Nitrogen Qxygen Carbo n 

Dixoide 

Carbon 

Monoxide 

9/--7 ; 

S1j I z r 

Average J L C'. ~ 

lc~iU 
AMERICAN EVVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

505 So. 8irch Drive 801-256-7t i' 

Soanish Fork, Utah 84667 

POST TEST BAClC HALF EVAPORATION 

COMPANY: 

SOURC-C: 

DATE: 

CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER 42 

METl-iYLE?VE CHLORIDE DISTiLLED WATER 

BLANK 

-,200 

BLANK 

Volume of Liquic Volume of LiquiFinai Weigtr /07 1346 7 Final Weigh /f-7 5:~ 141 

Tare Weight /07 1362 Tare Weighi /Y? -:~-a~t2 

Residue Residue 0.0002 

RUN 41 

of ~~O ~ 

RUN a1 

Volume Liquit Volume of Liqui ~ JrOD .Z 

Colot ~ Coioi 

Final Weigh• /06 /ySs Finai Weigh a-ff/ _ 

Tare Weight Tare Weighl -~ r7J' 

Residue & 61an1 0. od/y Residue & Blani 0 • OOd 6 

- BIanM D_v _. .--~ 

- BlanM r? c^ ~~ o ~? 

Residue _ G v o i ~/ `, /. y ~ Residue , 

~ 

(F . 

-- ~ 

RUN #2 RUN 42 

Volume of Liquii '200 .,,4 Volume of Liqui- .5-0 0 •^9 

Coloi Coloi 4!fQ,~ 

Finai Weigtr /07 Final Weigh /f7. o? / SS 

Tare Weight 16 7. 3V-28- Tare Weighi i?7 a/ -Y7 _ 

Residue & Blanl G. D o O 7 Residue & Blanl c. 

- Blanit D . O _. _.r..— ~ 

_ 

- Blani~ D • O oo ~ ,. . . _......_._:.`-- 

Residue L? • G yU 2 r' O. 7,~- ~ Residue [i. O O G ~ 

, 

RUN 43 RUN 93 

Volume of Liquit .;~ GG Volume of Liqui- 5-00 

Colot /111, 111c Co1oi ~ 

Finai Weigtr 1416 S-s 39 Fnai Weigh 197 SYS30 

Tare Weighi /C"i4. Tare Weight /-5 7. `/.5c2 / 

Residue & Blani C. Oa/o Residue & Blani Ci • O dC'% 

- BlanM L'% C'% - Blan!' 

Residue n . ~~O/o /, O Residue 219 \~ 

t ;0 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT 

1 Plant Interstate Brick Company 

2 Gty West Jordan, Utah 

3 Location No: 3 Brick Kiin Outlet #1 Run 

4 Operator Todd Benson 

5 Date 10/31-95 

6 Stack Diameter (in) 60 

7 Sample Box Number CR-Box 

8 Meter Box Number CR#(097) 

9 Meter AH@ 1.883 

10 Meter Calibration, Y 1.07 

11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8654 

12 Probe Length (ft) 6'-Q 

13 Probe Liner Material Glass 

14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248 

15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 55 

16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.42 

17 Assumed Moisture (%) 15 

18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.5 

19 C Factor 0 

20 Reference AP (in H20) 0.115 

21 Nozzle Identification Number 3/8"6 

22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.368 

23 Thermometer Number 1-A 

24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0080 

25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 20.8 

26 Filter Number K-1 

27 Gas Analysis 

28 CO (%) 0 

29 CO2 (%) 5.10 

30 02 (%) 14.90 

31 N2 (%) 80.00 

/eo-- 
PRETEST 

NOZZLE DIAMETER 

Dn = 0.368 

constant 0.0357 

Qm 0.75 

Pb(in HG) 25.42 

Pgm(in H20) -0.5 

Pm 25.3832 

Cp 0.8654 

Tm(°F) 85 

Tm(°R) 545 

Bwm 0 

Bws 0.15 

Ts(°F) 145 

Ts(°R) 605 

Mds 29.412 

Ms 27.7002 

Pb(in HG) 25.42 

Pgs(in H20) -0.5 

Ps 25.3832 

(AP)avg 0.115 

Dn = 0.3307 

PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH 

AH = 0.9276 

Cp 0.8654 constant 849.8000 

imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 AH@ 1.0000 

Gel H20(g) 12.0000 Mds 29.4120 

V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 Mm 29.4120 

Vm(acfl 49.2300 K 8.0661 

Ah avg 0.2000 AP 0.1150 

Vwc 6.0155 AH = 0.9276 

Vmc 43.3653 

Bws = 0.1218 

0 
Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume 

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference 

('F) (O F) (*F) (ft3) (ft3) 

starting 854.615 

1 77 77 139 856.851 2.24 

2 77 78 140 859.09 2.24 

3 78 78 139 861.515 2.42 

4 78 78 140 863.95 2.44 

5 79 78 141 866.267 2.32 

6 79 78 139 868.402 2.14 

7 79 79 140 870.674 2.27 

8 80 79 140 872.94 2.27 

9 80 79 140 875.341 2.40 

10 81 79 140 877.628 2.29 

11 81 79 140 880.028 2.40 

12 82 79 140 882.318 2.29 

13 83 80 140 884.365 2.05 

14 80 78 138 886.502 2.14 

15 82 80 139 888.901 2.40 

16 82 80 135 891.298 2.40 

17 82 80 134 893.623 2.33 

18 83 80 133 895.931 2.31 

19 83 81 134 898.236 2.31 

20 83 81 135 900.531 2.29 

21 84 81 136 902.85 2.32 

22 85 82 137 905.213 2.36 

23 85 82 136 907.542 2.33 

24 85 82 136 909.82, 2.28 

avg °F 80.33 137.96 

avg °R 540.33 597.96 

total = 55.2050 55.20 

average = 81.17 79.50 137.96 

Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume 

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm 

10 
Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling .. Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff ^Ps Time Time 

APs AH 

(in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 

1320 

0.11 1.66 0.3317 3 1323 2.1 

0.115 1.73 0.3391 3 1326 2.1 

0.12 1.81 0.3464 3 1329 2.2 

0.12 1.81 0.3464 3 1332 2.2 

0.12 1.81 0.3464 3 1335 2.2 

0.11 1.66 0.3317 3 1338 2.3 

0.125 1.89 0.3536 3 1341 2.3 

0.12 1.82 0.3464 3 1344 2.3 

0.125 1.89 0.3536 3 1347 2.4 

0.12 1.82 0.3464 3 1350 2.4 

0.13 1.97 0.3606 3 1353 2.4 

0.12 1.82 0.3464 3 1356 2.4 

0.1 1.52 0.3162 3 1408 2.6 

0.11 1.67 0.3317 3 1411 2.6 

0.14 2.13 0.3742 3 1414 2.6 

0.13 1.99 0.3606 3 1417 2.7 

0.12 1.84 0.3464 3 1420 2.7 

0.12 1.84 0.3464 3 1423 2.7 

0.12 1.84 0.3464 3 1426 2.7 

0.125 1.92 0.3536 3 1429 2.8 

0.12 1.84 0.3464 3 1432 2.8 

0.125 1.92 0.3536 3 1435 2.8 

0.13 2.00 0.3606 3 1438 2.8 

0.1 1.54 0.3162 3 1441 2.9 

72 72 

0.1198 1.8226 0.3459 3 1382 2.50 

Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff ^Ps Time Time 

APs AH 

' ~~ 
Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to 

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point 

Exit Outlet Isokinetics 

(`F) ('F) ('F) 

232 234 40 22.5953 103.71 

234 236 40 23.1224 101.59 

237 238 43 23.6001 107.56 

236 240 43 23.6198 108.09 

234 236 43 23.6394 102.85 

233 236 43 22.5953 98.79 

232 235 44 24.1068 98.68 

234 237 44 23.6198 100.35 

235 238 44 24.1068 104.20 

236 240 44 23.6198 101.20 

237 240 45 24.5842 102.07 

235 239 45 23.6198 101.25 

233 238 45 21.5618 98.91 

231 234 42 22.5765 98.72 

232 233 42 25.4910 98.12 

234 234 42 24.4816 101.36 

235 236 42 23.5014 102.21 

236 238 43 23.4816 101.29 

238 241 43 23.5014 101.17 

237 241 43 24.0062 98.79 

235 240 43 23.5409 101.87 

234 239 44 24.0465 101.65 

233 237 44 24.5021 98.18 

231 235 44 21.4898 109.36 

234.33 234.33 43.12 

Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger 

Temperature Temperature Temperature 

('F) (`F) ('F) 

l-R-0 
POST TE T CALCULATION 

VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT 

Vm(std) = 49.2786 Vw(std) = 7.9360 Bws = 0.1387 

Vm 55.2050 Vic(mis) 168.6 

Vm(std) = 49.2786 Vw(std) = 7.9360 

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE: STACK VELOCITY DRY STACK FLOW RATE 

Vs = 23.5423 

Mds = 29.4120 Q(std) = 1.0737E+6 

KP 85.49 

MOL WT WET STACK GASE: Vs = 23.5423 

Mws = 27.8291 

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION 

An = 7.3862E-4 

% ISO = 101.7164 

PARTICULATI 

Cs = 

Mn 

Cs = 

Ibs/dscf = 

grains/dscf = 

Ibs/hr = 

: CONCENTRATION 

6.6763E-4 

32.9 

6.6763E-4 

1.4719E-6 

0.0103 

1.5803 

NOx 

PPM = 23.4 

Ibs/hr = 3.000 

CO 

PPM = 461.14 

Ibs/hr = 36.045 

Initial Leak Check Rate 

Finish 854.499 Pitot Tubes 

Start 854.491 A = OK 

Rate = 0.0080 B = OK 

Vac. = 20.8 

Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes 

Finish 909.889 A = OK 

Start 909.882 B = OK 

Rate = 0.0070 

Vac. = 19.5 

S02 

PPM = 0.45 

Ibs/hr = 0.080 

HF 

mg/dscf = 0.00834 

Ibs/hr = 0.0198 

~~-1 
American Environrnental Tas-Ling Company, Inc_ 

565 So uth E irc:1 D rive 

Spanish Fori<, Utah 8450,0 

(801) 2e6-7111 

LAS ORLAT0 RY DATA 

EPA Methcd 5 

Company: Run Number: _41/ 

~ 

Sampiing Location: ~-~ ~ ~u~ ~~'~ Date: 

Moisture Coilec3ed 

initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain 

Impinger.l 5-9-5' ~ 706. o 

- Impinger 2 606. 'D Es9. 6 S3 y 

Impinger 3 y 70. y ~'7i . 3 Dv 

impinger 4 7 7y7 % yC;~ 

Total Gain = /6~~ 6 

' Particutate Coilected 

Front - Halt Analysis (Nozz:e, Probe, Fiiter and Oven Giassware) 

1. Fitter Final Weight 

2. Fiiter Tare Weight 

3. Total Filter Weight 

4. Particulate caught in 

nozzie, probe and glassware 

5. Total Front - Hatt Catctt 

Cl.6s67 

O G.~ 

O - o--Ao/ 

C~ . C7/o?o2 

Back - F',alf Analysis (impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 

1. Partkuiate caught in impingers 

evaporated down at less than 

1200 F. 

Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and Back - Halt Catches) 

3a . 17 

`C~' r 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

Company: • ~ ~~ Date:/4 ' 13,/— 15~~ _ 

Source: #3 /(r~ ~~~ ~ Run Number: 

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry 

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Carbon 

Dixoide Monoxide 

/ 

?o. o f ~ '. s l ~ o / 

7110 

go . 

0, 

~ 

(?o . c-o 1 

Average ~j 

~o j 

19 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT 

1 Plant Interstate Brick Company 

2 Gty West Jordan, Utah 

3 Location No. 3 Brick Kiln Outlet #2 Run 

4 Operator Todd Benson 

5 Date 10/31-95 

6 Stack Diameter (in) 60 

7 Sample Box Number CR-Box 

8 Meter Box Number CR#(097) 

9 Meter AH@ 1.883 

10 Meter Calibration, Y 1.07 

11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8654 

12 Probe Length (ft) 6'-Q 

13 Probe Liner Material Glass 

14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248 

15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 55 

16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.35 

17 Assumed Moisture (%) 14 

18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.5 

19 C Factor 0 

20 Reference AP (in H20) 0.115 

21 Nozzle Identification Number 3/8"6 

22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.368 

23 Thermometer Number 1-A 

24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0060 

25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 20 

26 Filter Number K-2 

27 Gas Analysis 

28 CO (%) 0 

29 CO2 (%) 5.10 

30 02 (%) 14.50 

31 N2 (%) 80.40 

13 CD 
Amefican Environmental Testing Company, Inc54~ So uth Birch D rive 

Spanish Foric, Utah 84664 

(80 1) 258-7111 

~ 

Company:_l_ v~ ~ef S~, ~~ i c~~ Date:10/ 

Source:~`~ T~~t~" lC ~ ~~ Run Number: ~ 

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Voiume Percert - Dry 

Nitrogen Qxygen Carbo n 

Dixoide 

Carbon 

Monoxide 

+ ~ ~ 

32 o . 

Average 

~, 7 G ` l ~~•' 
PRETEST CALCULATIONS 

NOZZLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH 

Dn = 0.368 AH = 0.9456 

constant 0.0357 

Qm 0.75 

Pb(in HG) 25.35 

Pgm(in H20) -0.5 

Pm 25.3132 

Gp 0.8654 

Tm(°F) 85 

Tm(°R) 545 

Bwm 0 

Bws 0.14 

Ts(°F) 145 

Ts(°R) 605 

Mds 29.396 

Ms 27.8006 

Pb(in HG) 25.35 

Pgs(in H20) -0.5 

Ps 25.3132 

(AP)avg 0.115 

Dn = 0.3307 

Cp 0.8654 

Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 

Gel H20(g) 12.0000 

V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 

Vm(acf) 49.2300 

Ah avg 0.2000 

Vwc 6.0155 

Vmc 43.2460 

Bws = 0.1221 

constant 849.8000 

AH@ 1.0000 

Mds 29.3960 

Mm 29.3960 

K 8.2227 

AP 0.1150 

AH = 0.9456 

/3 v 
Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Vollume Volume 

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference 

(°F) (°F) (°F) (ft3) (ft3) 

starting 910.205 

1 85 84 137 912.111 1.91 

2 84 85 135 914.129 2.02 

3 85 85 138 916.375 2.25 

4 86 85 132 918.523 2.15 

5 85 85 136 920.641 2.12 

6 85 85 137 922.702 2.06 

7 86 85 138 924.965 2.26 

8 86 85 133 927.198 2.23 

9 86 85 133 929.416 2.22 

10 85 84 133 931.597 2.18 

11 85 85 134 933.663 2.07 

12 85 85 134 935.851 2.19 

13 86 85 135 938.076 2.22 

14 84 83 136 940.122 2.05 

15 85 83 135 942.237 2.11 

16 85 84 135 944.401 2.16 

17 85 84 134 946.619 2.22 

18 86 85 135 948.764 2.14 

19 86 85 135 950.815 2.05 

20 86 85 136 952.905 2.09 

21 87 85 136 955.033 2.13 

22 87 85 137 957.202 2.17 

23 87 86 136 959.34 2.14 

24 86 86 136 961.476 2.14 

avg °F 85.15 135.25 

avg °R 545.15 595.25 

total = 51.2710 51.27 

average = 85.54 84.75 135.25 

Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point . Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume 

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm 

133 
Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff ^Ps Time Time 

^Ps AH 

(in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 

1630 

0.099 1.55 0.3146 3 1633 2.2 

0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1636 2.2 

0.13 2.03 0.3606 3 1639 2.5 

0.11 1.74 0.3317 3 1642 2.5 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1645 2.6 

0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1648 2.6 

0.13 2.04 0.3606 3 1651 2.6 

0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1654 2.6 

0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1657 2.7 

0.115 1.81 0.3391 3 1700 2.8 

0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1703 2.8 

0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1706 2.9 

0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1715 3.1 

0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1718 3.1 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1721 3.1 

0.115 1.81 0.3391 3 1724 3.2 

0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1727 3.2 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1730 3.2 

0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1733 3.3 

0.105 1.65 0.3240 3 1736 3.4 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1739 3.4 

0.115 1.81 0.3391 3 1742 3.5 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1745 3.5 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1748 3.5 

72 72 

0.1116 1.7546 0.3338 3 1695.5 2.94 

Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head . Diff APs Time Time 

APs AH 

134 
Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to 

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point 

Exit Outlet Isokinetics 

('F) (`F) ('F) 

239 240 39 21.5893 94.81 

241 241 39 21.6617 99.72 

238 239 40 24.7603 97.62 

236 238 40 22.6616 100.83 

235 238 40 22.7380 99.83 

236 239 40 21.6980 101.93 

239 241 41 24.7603 98.28 

240 242 41 23.6892 100.48 

242 244 42 23.6892 99.81 

244 245 42 23.1905 100.38 

242 244 42 21.6435 101.92 

239 241 43 23.7092 98.61 

234 235 43 23.7292 100.29 

233 235 43 21.6799 101.34 

234 236 44 22.7189 99.76 

236 239 45 23.2295 99.77 

238 240 45 23.7092 100.04 

240 241 45 22.7189 100.94 

241 242 46 21.6617 101.19 

242 244 47 22.2152 100.73 

239 241 47 22.7380 100.15 

238 239 47 23.2686 99.94 

237 238 48 22.7380 100.55 

235 237 48 22.7380 100.53 

238.25 238.25 43.21 

Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger 

Temperature Temperature Temperature 

('F) ('F) ('F) 

15~ 
POST TEST CALCULATION 

VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT 

Vm(std) = 45.2297 Vw(std) = 9.4940 Bws = 0.1735 

Vm 51.2710 Vic(mis) 201.7 

Vm(std) = 45.2297 Vw(std) = 9.4940 

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE: 

Mds = 29.3960 

MOL WT WET STACK GASE: 

Mws = 27.4189 

STACK VELOCITY 

Vs = 22.8724 

Kp ' 85.49 

Vs = 22.8724 

DRY STACK FLOW RATE 

Q(std) = 1.0028E+6 

1SOKINETIC CALCULATION 

An = 7.3862E-4 

% ISO = 99.9607 

Initial Leak Check Rate 

Finish 910.148 Pitot Tubes 

Start 910.142 A = OK 

Rate = 0.0060 B = OK 

Vac. = 20 

Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes 

Finish 961.799 A = OK 

Start 961.792 B = OK 

Rate = 0.0070 

Vac. = 19.1 

PARTICULATI CONCENTRATION 

Cs = 8.0699E-4 

Mn 36.5 

Cs = 8.0699E-4 

Ibs/dscf = 1.7791 E-6 

grains/dscf = 0.0125 

Ibs/hr = 1.7841 

NOx 

PPM = 19.54 

Ibs/hr = 2.340 

CO 

PPM = 409.35 

Ibs/hr = 29.884 

S02 

PPM = 0.34 

Ibs/hr = 0.057 

HF 

mg/dscf = 0.0072 

Ibs/hr = 0.016 

< ~q& 
Amefican Enwironrnental Testing Cornpany, Inc_ 

565 So uth Birctt D rive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84560 

(801) 266-7111 

LA8ORATaRY DATA 

EPA Method 5 

Company: Run Number: 

Sampiing Location: /~'~ D~ ~~Date: 

Mbisture Coilected 

Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain 

Impinger 1 7dC .'~' y 

Impinger 2 &IQs 7 f~?-51-6 ~?/. 9 

Impinger 3 q7/, ~/ R. / 

impinger 4 75 7 D 7 '~. 7 

Total Gain = v?0 j, 7 

Particufate Coilected 

Front - Haif Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Fiiter and Oven Glassware) 

1. Fitter Final Weight 

2. FiRer Tare Weight 

3. Total Filter Weight 

4. Partkutate caught in 

nozzle, probe and glassware 

S. Total Front - Half Catch 

O• E.~'%.~ 

lJ . 6 (7) S" y jL_~ 

D oRE tz 

G, oo9y 

D•~~Ss 

Back - Haft Analysis (impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 

1. Partfculate caught In impingers 

evaporated down at less than 

120° F. 0.7 

Total Part(cuiate Catch (Sum of Front and Back - Half Catcttes) 

, 

131 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

Company: Date: /~o •- -?/ - SS 

Source: ~`3 ~u ~ Ou&I Run Number: 

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry 

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Carbon 

Dixoide Monoxide 

S, 

~z 

~3 

Average 

13t 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT 

1 Plant Interstate Brick Company 

2 Gty West Jordan, Utah 

3 Location No. 3 Brick Kiln Outlet #3 Run 

4 Operator Todd Benson 

5 Date 10/31-95 

6 Stack Diameter (in) 60 

7 Sample Box Number CR-Box 

8 Meter Box Number CR#(097) 

9 Meter AH@ 1.883 

10 Meter Calibration, Y 1.07 

11 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8654 

12 Probe Length (ft) 6'-Q 

13 Probe Liner Material Glass 

14 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248 

15 Ambient Temperature (°F) 55 

16 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.32 

17 Assumed Moisture (°r6) 14 

18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.5 

19 C Factor 0 

20 Reference AP (in H20) 0.115 

21 Nozzle Identification Number 3/8"6 

22 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.368 

23 Thermometer Number 1-A 

24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.0060 

25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 20.2 

26 Filter Number K-3 

27 Gas Analysis 

28 CO 0 

29 CO2 (%) 4.90 

30 02 (°r6) 14.90 

31 N2 (9'0) 80.20 

i~ 
PRETEST CALCULATIONS 

NOZZLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH 

Dn = 0.368 AH = 0.9456 

constant 849.8000 

AH@ 1.0000 

Mds 29.3800 

Mm 29.3800 

K 8.2223 

AP 0.1150 

AH = 0.9456 

constant 0.0357 

Qm 0.75 

Pb(in HG) 25.32 

Pgm(in H20) -0.5 

Pm 25.2832 

Cp . 0.8654 

Tm(°F) 85 

Tm(°R) 545 

Bwm 0 

Bws 0.14 

Ts(°F) 145 

Ts(-R) 605 

Mds 29.38 

Ms 27.7868 

Pb(in HG) 25.32 

Pgs(in H20) -0.5 

Ps 25.2832 

(AP)avg 0.115 

Dn = 0.3306 

Cp 0.8654 

Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 

Gel H20(g) 12.0000 

V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 

Vm(acf) 49.2300 

Ah avg 0.2000 

Vwc 6.0155 

Vmc 43.1948 

Bws = 0.1222 

/0 
Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Voiume 

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference 

('F) (O F) (*F) (ft3) (ft3) 

starting 962.016 

1 84 84 138 963.972 1.96 

2 84 84 137 966.057 2.08 

3 85 84 136 968.341 2.28 

4 84 84 138 970.398 2.06 

5 84 84 137 972.522 2.12 

6 85 85 134 974.624 2.10 

7 85 84 135 976.852 2.23 

8 85 84 136 979.002 2.15 

9 85 85 136 981.096 2.09 

10 85 85 134 983.168 2.07 

11 85 85 134 984.896 1.73 

12 86 85 135 987.009 2.11 

13 86 85 131 989.327 2.32 

14 84 85 136 991.471 2.14 

15 85 84 134 993.659 2.19 

16 86 85 134 995.813 2.15 

17 86 85 135 998.036 2.22 

18 86 85 136 1000.102 2.07 

19 86 85 135 1002.331 2.23 

20 86 85 135 1004.464 2.13 

21 86 85 135 1006.683 2.22 

22 87 85 136 1008.836 2.15 

23 87 85 136 1010.938 2.10 

24 88 86 137 1013.084 2.15 

avg °F 85.06 135.42 

avg °R 545.06 595.42 

total = 51.0680 51.07 

average = 85.42 84.71 135.42 

Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point . Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume 

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm 

,~ i 
Vefocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff APs Time Time 

APs AH 

(in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 

1900 

0.099 1.55 0.3146 3 1903 3.3 

0.105 1.64 0.3240 3 1906 3.3 

0.13 2.04 0.3606 3 1909 3.3 

0.1 1.56 0.3162 3 1912 3.4 

0.11 1.72 0.3317 3 1915 3.4 

0.105 1.65 0.3240 3 1918 3.5 

0.125 1.96 0.3536 3 1921 3.5 

0.11 1.72 0.3317 3 1924 3.5 

0.105 1.65 0.3240 3 1927 3.5 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1930 3.5 

0.1 1.57 0.3162 3 1933 3.6 

0.115 1.81 0.3391 3 1936 3.6 

0.125 1.98 0.3536 3 1945 3.8 

0.11 1.72 0.3317 3 1948 3.9 

0.115 1.81 0.3391 3 1951 3.9 

- 0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 1954 3.9 

0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 1957 3.9 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 2000 4.1 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 2003 4.1 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 2006 4.1 

0.12 1.89 0.3464 3 2009 4.2 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 2012 4.2 

0.105 1.65 0.3240 3 2015 4.2 

0.11 1.73 0.3317 3 2018 4.2 

72 72 

0.1112 1.7473 0.3333 3 1952.1666667 3.75 

Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head . Diff APs Time Time 

APs AH 
Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to 

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point 

E)at Outlet Isoldnetics 

(°F) (°F) (°F) 

236 239 38 21.6083 97.00 

238 239 38 22.2349 100.34 

240 241 39 24.7200 98.72 

241 243 39 21.7172 101.51 

241 242 39 22.7581 99.89 

239 240 39 22.1790 100.76 

238 238 39 24.2196 98.11 

236 237 39 22.7391 100.95 

234 235 39 22.2163 100.54 

231 233 40 22.7009 97.05 

230 233 40 21.6445 84.86 

232 234 40 23.2306 96.82 

237 242 42 24.1380 101.58 

238 242 43 22.7391 100.67 

239 243 43 23.2111 100.33 

240 243 38 22.7009 100.82 

238 240 39 23.7303 99.74 

237 239 39 22.7391 96.86 

235 237 39 22.7200 104.41 

234 235 40 22.7200 99.92 

236 236 40 23.7303 99.56 

237 239 40 22.7391 100.86 

238 240 40 22.2163 100.77 

240 241 41 22.7581 100.47 

236.88 236.88 39.71 

Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger 

Temperature Temperature Temperature 

(°F) (°F) (°F) 

ibl~ 
POST TEST CALCULATION 

VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT 

Vm(std) = 45.0035 Vw(std) = 9.1975 Bws = 0.1697 

Vm 51.0680 Vic(mis) 195.4 

Vm(std) = 45.0035 Vw(std) = 9.1975 

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE: 

Mds = 29.3800 

MOL WT WET STACK GASE: 

Mws = 27.4489 

STACK VELOCITY 

Vs = 22.8384 

Kp 85.49 

Vs = 22.8384 

DRY STACK FLOW RATE 

Q(std) = 1.0044E+6 

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION 

An = 7.3862E-4 

% ISO = 99.2984 

Initial Leak Check Rate 

Finish 961.901 Pitot Tubes 

Start 961.895 A = OK 

Rate = 0.0060 B = OK 

Vac. = 20.2 

Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes 

Finish 961.799 A = OK 

Start 961.792 B = OK 

Rate = 0.0070 

Vac. = 19.1 

PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION 

Cs = 6.6217E-4 

Mn 29.8 

Cs = 6.6217E-4 

Ibs/dscf = 1.4598E-6 

grains/dscf = 0.0102 

Ibs/hr = 1.4663 

NOx 

PPM = 24.58 

Ibs/hr = 2.948 

CO 

PPM = 420.32 

Ibs/hr = 30.735 

S02 

PPM = 0.34 

Ibs/hr = 0.057 

HF 

mg/dscf = 0.00673 

Ibs/hr = 0.0149 

/w 
American Environ,:nental Tas-ting Carnpany, Inc_ 

5c5 So uth Birc.h D rive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

($01) 2e6-7111 

LASORATOt`3Y DATJ1 

EPA Methcd 5 

Co mpany: g'Z~at'~_ Run Num ber: 

Sampling Lxation:#3 Date: 

Nloisture Coilec3ed 

initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain 

tmpinger 1 S9Z_ 3 777, ,i~ /ss/ . 3 

- Impinger 2 V/'0"9. ~/ 6/-2. / 

Impinger 3 71. yZ,?. ~r >, / 

Impinger 4 go6 • 7 

Total Gain 

, 

Pariicufate Coltecied 

Front - Half Analysis (Nozzie, Probe, Fiiier and aven Grassware) 

1. Fitter Finat itVeight 

2. Ftlter Tare Weight 

3. Total Fiiter Weight 

4. Particvlate caught in 

nozzle, probe and giassware 

S. Total Frront - Half Catcfi 

D• 6aaI-e 

0, 601V ? 

-0 . D l.F 

Back - Half Analysis (impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 

1. Pariicutate caught in impingers 

evaporated down at iess than 

120° F. D ~ 

Total Partitulate Catch (Sum of Fr+ont and Back.-.Halt Catches) 

-- .......... ... . .. .. . ... ..... . ... -- ~ - _. 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

Company: AZ4,,,Z~- Date: !D - .3 / .- 9 5'- 

Source: i#3 ~~. C~~~ ~-1 Run Number: co 

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry 

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Carbon 

Dixoide Monoxide 

~ 

Average 

/4/6 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

POST TEST BACX HALF EVAPORATION 

COMPANY:A ~ ~ 

SOURCE: Gi'zv"'A Z 

DATE: //- 6 5SACETONE BLANK WATER BLANK 

Volume of Liquic ~~ ~ Volume of Liquic 

Finai Weight /01/ ~ l-S-~~ Final Weight 

Tare Weight Tare Weight 

Residue Residue 

RUN #1 RUN #1 

Volume of Liquic ~-5~' ~ Volume of Liquic 

Color ~ Color 

Final Weight lo7. JSyO Final Weight 

Tare Weight /D 72 4// 7 Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank Residue & BIanN 

- Blank Blank 

Residue a ~ Residue 

._- 

RU.N #2 

a~ y~ 

RUN #2 

Voiume of Liquic Volume of Liquic 

Color f42~ Color 

Final Weight lO~ 7-3 V 7 Final Weight 

Tare Weight 106. -7.?5-a Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank U OO 9-5- Residue & Blank 

- Blank O oOo/ - Blank 

Residue O 0 02y . 

Residue 

1 

 ~—. _. .. ~.. _. . _ .... ... . . . 

RUN #3 RUN #3 

Volume of Liquic _Qs0 ~ Volume of Liquic 

Color Color 

Final Weight /C6 , kaZ y6 Final Weight 

Tare Weight /nd • 572-3-7 -- - Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank Ctll3 Residue & Blank 

- Blank O. 000/ ___ _ - Blank 

Residue 0. 0112 Residue 

7. ) ' 

1~1 
AMERICAN ETIVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-71 1 1 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

POST TEST BAClC HALF EVAPORATION 

COMPANY: 

SOURCE: 14"3 f~44 

DATE: %/' ,4~ •- y~ 

CONTAINER #1 

METHYLENE CI-iLORIDE 

BLANK 

Voiume of Liquio ado » `~ 

Finai Weigh• /D 7 - - 

Tare Weight /''i7 

Residue /' • (o e) Uc-~ 

CONTAINER 42 

DISTILLED WATER 

BLANK 

Voiume of Liqui, .S00 1-1Z 

Finai Weigh 

Tare Weight /97 

Residue C' " ODCS-: 

RUN 91 /f RUN #1 

Volume of Liquii Volume 

Coloi 

Finai Weigh• _ %6 E 4-2ysC> 

Tare Weight Q ii"17 

-, 

Residue & Blanl G' Residue 

- Blanit O 

Residue C' • 000.3 ~ O•,~ ~ 

RUN #2 RUN #2 

Volume of Liquit ~'yc- "'9 Volume of Liquu 50~ ✓+~ 

Colo[ Coloi 

Final WeiglT / 9 Final Weigh /of-71fs9PTare Weighl /06 21 4~2 Tare Weighi zfSS/ 

Residue & Blani O 0002 Residue & Blanl C• GOG 7 

- BIanN D a _----~ ~ . - B1anM l' 0r7 0 2 

Residue D OoU~2 Residue O• 00457• 

RUN #3 

Volume ot Liquit 00 >^^~ 

Colof~— 

Final Weigh• /O~ . f'lS.120 

Tare Weight 1416 ocSn2g 

Residue & Blanl CO Doo.? 

- BlanM 

Residue r^i • ODd? 4 " l~•v~ `~ ~ 

~----_-----/'_" _ 

RUN #3 

Volume of Liqui- -5- y0 :.k0 

Coloi 6&1 1_ 

Final Weigh ]87 9~3.~/ 

Tare Weight /?1 7 

Residue & Blanl 0 • OG 0.3 

- BIanM c70 o ~2 --- --• - -1 

Residue 

/~/d7 

of Liqui. 

Coloi ILL~~ 

Final Weigh 1Y7 -5/Z Y 

Tare Weight 

, 

& Blani O 

- BIanM C' 

Residue (fl• o 0 os' :'' 
American tnvironmental I esting Company, inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

~ Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

Er,=, r-!etnoc C C,.,, c'cnic F;ow De:e.=n,a;:c -1 

P?ant. ~i~~2~ R:.n Nc 

Locat ~ on: -~3 ~.~ 0~~~ ;P~~.-~ operatcr: 7- 15 X9 Z 

Date: %O - — SS~ Amb Temp. 'F: 

2aro. Pressure: PS Static Pressure: 

Pitot T ube (C:,;: C. J;:6S` e Stac: Dimens,ens: 60 

Traverse Point 

Numner 

Velocity head 

(oPs) In H20 

Stac; Temperature 

r 

Cyclonic Flow Determination 

c.Ps at 0' 

Reference 

Angle wh•icn yielas a 

null cP 

1 I ~ C~ • C~ 3 I 5~ I 

' o• i~ I I o. ~~ I ~' i 

C7 i 

6 0.0 c~ 

I . / I I • ~~ ~ 

iG 0.12 I I O• 0. I 3 i 

, .!. I I o. v z ! ~ 

/1Z o, •y I o.c/ I I 

13 • 12 3 i 

16 D• i~ i p ~ C7 I 

rg 12 I 0.0 

-sz 

~z 

,~~ •~ I I . c~ . I 3 I 

0.13 

i 

0. o. I L I 

I I I 

I 17,16ri ZrG i I I 

I I I 

Average Ar~ g 1 e: IC, / J 

i LA 

Appendix "E" 

(Emissions Calculations) 

10 
~ mE <<can Cr_cTc:-zonm,-zrzfaf 

~7Ei RncJ Com# ar_5, ~nc. 

/, r-, / . 

7O~ GCOflt.'2 L^ C tC.'2 .~ iLC•E 

c.C/.2ani:~ `~~~z, 2L~a~ 466o 

80 1 - 79,y- S553 

Nomenclature for Particulate Calculations 

m 1 EngJish Units Metric Units DescrigtiQn 

As in 2 m2 Stack Area 

Can gr/dscf' g/dscrn' Particulate - probe, cyc:one and filter 

Cao gr/dscf' g/dscm' Particulate - tota( 

Cat gr/CF g/m3 Particulate - probe, cyione and fitter 

@ stack conditions 

Cau gr,'CF g/m3 Particutate - tctal 

(g) stac:c condPtions 

Caw Ibs/hr kg/hr Particulate - probe, cycione and filter 

CaX Ibs/hr kg/hr Particulate - total 

Cp Pitot Tube CaJibration Factor 

Dn in m Sampiing Noz:le Diameter 

°%EA Percent Excess AIr at sampling point 

g 32.2 ft/s2 9.81 m/s2 Acceieration of gravity 

%1 Percent isokinetic 

%M Percent moisture in stack gas by Volume 

Md Mole faction of dry gas 

' 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (790 mm Hg, 200 C) 

c%ltva"u 

7Os-yS6- ~~.: o ~~ = = ;- = ~~

r Y01-'166- ~„f ~C/~ 
s 

a4m- 1221 Fntslish Units Metric Units Descri,Btion 

Mf mg mg Particulate - prcbe, cyclone and filter 

MH2O 18 Ib/Ib-mole Molecular Weight of Water 

m t mg mg Particulate - tctal 

MW Ib/Ib-mole g/g-mole Molecular Weight of wet stack gas 

MWair 28.95 Ib/Ib-mole Molecular Weight of air 

MWd Ib/lb-mole g/g-mole Molecuiar Weight of dry stack gas 

Pb "Hg Absolute mm Hg Barometric Pressure 

Pm "H20 mm H20 Orifice Pressure Drop 

Ps "Hg Absolute mm Hg Stack Pressure 

pP "H20 mm H2o Veiocity Head of stack gas 

Pstd "29•92 "H9 760 mm Hg Standard Barometric Pressure 

Qd ACFM m 3/ h r Stack Gas Volume at Actual Stack condition 

os DSCFM' dscm/hr' Stack Gas Volume at 29.92 "Hg, 528°R,dry 

R 21.83 "Hg- Universal Gas Consant 

ft3/Ib-mole°R 

Tm °F °C Average Gas Meter Temperature 

Tt min min Net Time of test 

Ts °F °C Stack Temperature 

Tstd 528°R 293 K Standard Temperature 

Vm ft3 m3 Volume of dry gas sampled at meter 

condtions 

Vmstd dscf' dscm' Volume of dry gas sampled at standard 

conditions 

Vs fpm misec Stack velocity at stack conditions 

Vw m I m 1 Total water collected in impingers and 

' 29.92 "Hg, 528°R (790 mm Hg, 20° C) silica gel 

10 
sy-M-170-1 Enaiish Uni#s Metric Units Descri to ion 

Vwgas s c f s c m' Volume of water vapor collected at 

standard canditions 

Pair 0.0748 Ibslft3 Density ofAir 

pH20 1 g/ml Density of water 

Pman 51.63 Ibs/f13 Denisty of manometer oil 

Standard CondPtions: 29.92 "Hg, 68°F (760 mm Hg, 20° C) 

' 29.92 "Hg, 528°R (760 mm Hg, 20° C) 

/5~ 
Example Particulate Calculations 

1. Volume of Dry Gas sampled at standard conditions.` 

Vm std = Vm [,Ts*,d Pb +(Pm/13.61 

m + 460] [ Pstd ~ 

Vm std = 17.65 x Vm (—Pb +(Pm/13.6) ~ 

L Tm + 460 = dscf 

Vm std = dscf x 0.028317 = dscm 

2. Voiume of water vapor collected at standard conditions.' 

Vw gas =(Vw - gms S02 - gms H2S) P H20 x R x Tstd 

P std x M H20 x 453.6 

. Vw gas = 0.0472 x(Vw - gms S02 - gms H2S) = scf 

Vw gas = scf x 0.028317 = scrn 

: 3. Percent moisture in stack gas. 

Vw gas 

%,'1= [Vms;d+Vwgas x 100 =°'° 

4. Mole fraction of dry gas. 

Md =100 - %M 

100 

S. Average molecular weight of dry stacic gas. 

MW = r.0O2 x 10~ +r%02 

 x100~ 

 +r %N2x 280~ + r%COx

100] = glgmoe

le 

t L L L 

6. Molecular weight of stack gas. 

MW = MWd x Md + 184 (1 - Md) = Ib = g/g-mole 

Ib-mole 

7. Percent excess air at sampling point. 

%EA = 100 (%02 - 0.5% CO) 

0.265 (%N2) - (%02) + 0.5 (%CO) 

' 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (760 mm Hg, 20° C) 

/~~ 
8. Stac4c pressure. 

Ps = Pb + F stack pressure "H20 ~ _ "Hg Absolute 

L 13.6 

Ps ="Hg Absolute x 25.4 = mm Hg 

9. Stack velocity at stack conditions. 

Vs= Cpx60x2gxPmanxP stdxMWairx(Ts+460)xoPs~ 1/2 

1 12 x P air x Ps x MW x T std 

Vs = 5123.8 x Cp x("(Ts + 460) x OPs

I 

1/2 = fpm L PsxMW 

Vs = fpm x 0.00508 = m/second 

10. Dry stack gas volume at standard conditions.' 

as=1 xVsxAsxMdxTstd x Ps 

144 Ts + 460 P s td 

Qs - 0.123 x Vs x As x Md x Ps = DSCFM 

. Ts + 460 

Os = DSCPM x 1.6990 = dscmihr. 

11. Actual stack gas volume at stack conditions. 

ca =Vs x As= ACFM 

144 

Qa = ACFM x 1.6990 = m3/hr 

12. Percent isokinetic. 

%I =Vm std x(Ts + 460) x P std x 100 x 14A 

aDn2 

MdxTstdxPsxTtxVsx 4 

%I =1039 X Vm std x(Ts + 460) 

Md x Ps x Tt x Vs x Dn2 

' 29.92 "Hg, 528°R (760 mm Hg, 20° C) 

1v~~ 
13. Particulate - probe, cycicne and filter. 

Can =mfx ~1 o`r _ 

Vm std 64.8 mg 

Can = 0.0154 x mf = gr/dscf' 

Vm std 

Can = gr/dscf x 2.290 = g/dscm' 

14. Particulate total. 

Cao = 0.0154 x mt = gridscf' 

V m std 

Cao = gr/dscf x 2.290 = g/dscm' 

15. Particulate - probe, cyclone and fiiter at stack conditions. 

Cat = Can x Ps x (T std) x Md 

_ Ps std (Ts + 460) 

Cat =17.65 x Can x Ps x Md= gr/CF 

Ts + 460 

Cat = gr/CF x 2.290 = g/m 3 

16. Particulate - total at stack conditions. 

Cau =17.65 x Cao x Ps x Md= gr/CF 

Ts + 460 

Cau = gr/CF x 2.290 = g/m3 

17. Particulate - probe, cyc!one and filter. 

Caw = Can x os x60 minx1 Ib 

1 hr 7000 gr 

Caw = 0.00857 x Can x Qs = Ibs/hr 

Caw = Ibs/hr x 0.4536 = kg/hr 

18. Particulate - total. 

Cax = 0.00857 x Cao x Os = Ibs/hr 

Cax = Ibs/hr x 0.4536 = kg/hr 

' 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (760 mm Hg, 20° C) 

i~~ 
Appendix "F" 

(Data-Logger Sheets) 

c4mE ,tican (EtzcrizonmEnEaf 7eiEin9 Comf2arzy gnc. 

GI~eno, GNevada f(Pizocnix, o42i.zorza Za['t %'a~,_ eLty, 2(Ea4 

702-786-8553 6o2- 253-3354 8or-266-7111 

/L~_f Y 
Appendix "F" 

(Data-Logger Sheets) 

~5~ 























Company: Interstate Brick Date: 10/31-95 

Source: Kiln #3 Outlet Sample Gas: NOx 

Span: 100 

Analvzer Caiibration 

Cylinder Analyzer Absoiute Difference 

Value Response Difference (% of span) 

(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 

0 -0.2 0.20 0.20 

53.4 53.2 0.20 0.20 

87.3 87.2 0.10 0.10 

Svstem Calibration 

Analyzer System Absolute Difference 

Response Response Difference (;% of span) 

(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 

-0.2 0.4 0.60 0.60 

na na 0.00 0.00 

87.2 87.6 0.40 0.40 

-

5amole Svstem Bias #1 Initial Final 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(pprn) (% of span) (°% of span) 

-0.2 0.4 0.60 0.1 0.30 0.30 

87.2 87.6 0.40 87.7 0.50 0.10 

,Sample Svstem Bias #2 Initial Finai 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 

-0.2 0.1 0.30 0.6 0.80 0.50 

87.2 87.7 0.50 87.7 0.50 0.00 

,Sample Svstem Bias #3 Initial Final 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 

-0.2 0.6 0.80 0 0.20 0.60 

87.2 87.7 0.50 87.6 0.40 0.10 

i ~3 

Appendix "G" 

(AET CEM Readings) 

g~ 
Run #1 interstate Brick - Kiln #3 Outtet 

Time 1551 Date 10/31 /95 

Minutes NOx CO 02 S02 

1 23.5 472.5 14.2 0.4 

2 23.5 465.7 14.3 0.5 

3 23.4 462.6 14.2 0.4 

4 23.2 490.7 14.3 0.4 

5 24.2 469.6 13.7 0.4 

6 24.2 456.7 13.6 0.4 

7 24.3 460.5 13.6 0.4 

8 23.3 452.9 13.8 0.4 

9 22.9 462.7 14.3 0.4 

10 22.9 471.6 14.3 0.5 

11 22.8 466.9 14.3 0.4 

12 22.8 475.8 14.2 0.5 

13 22.8 472.5 14.2 0.4 

14 22.8 489.7 14.2 0.5 

15 24.5 402.4 13.9 0.6 

16 19.5 478.7 14.3 0.5 

17 23.5 452.7 13.7 0.6 

18 24.1 451.8 13.6 0.4 

19 24.2 451 13.6 0.4 

20 24.2 443 13.6 0.5 

21 24.5 447 13.6 0.5 

22 23.9 443.9 13.8 0.4 

23 23.2 461.7 14.2 0.5 

24 23 475.7 14.2 0.4 

25 22.8 480.7 14.2 0.4 

26 22.7 451.8 14.2 0.5 

27 23.6 476.7 13.9 0.4 

28 24 454.9 13.6 0.6 

29 24.2 437.9 13.6 0.5 

30 23.6 453.9 13.6 0.4 

0 

Average = 23.40 461.14 13.96 0.45 

f~ 
Run #2 interstate Brick - Kiin #3 Outlet 

Time 1718 Date 10/31 /95 

Minutes NOx CO 02 S02 

1 18.8 409.3 12.5 0.4 

2 22.8 414.2 12.3 0.4 

3 18.7 408.1 12.5 0.3 

4 19.4 411.3 13.4 0.4 

5 19.6 409.2 16.5 0.4 

6 18.6 399.1 14.4 0.4 

7 18.3 417.1 15 0.3 

8 18.2 413.3 15.2 0.3 

9 18.1 417.2 15.3 0.3 

10 18.1 426 15.4 0.3 

11 18.1 423.2 15.4 0.3 

12 21.9 419 15.5 0.4 

13 21.6 410.3 15.5 0.3 

' 14 20.4 415.2 15.6 0.3 

15 17.7 419.4 15.6 0.3 

16 18.1 420.1 15.6 0.4 

17 16.1 344.3 15.5 0.3 

18 21 415.3 16 0.3 

19 22 404.3 15.5 0.4 

20 23.1 402.1 15.3 0.3 

21 22.6 399.4 15.2 0.3 

22 21.8 390.3 15.2 0.3 

23 17.5 401.1 15.1 0.3 

24 20.7 403 15.5 0.3 

25 20.5 412.1 15.7 0.3 

26 17 414.2 14.6 0.3 

27 20.4 419.4 14.7 0.4 

28 16.9 411.4 14.7 0.4 

29 20.6 418.3 14.7 0.4 

: 30 17.5 413.4 14.5 0.3 

Average = 19.54 409.35 14.93 0.34 

i0 
Run #3 Interstate Bricic - Kiln #3 Outlet 

Time 1828 Date 10/31 /95 

, •. • • • 

1 22.9 382.4 13.2 0.4 

2 22.9 384.3 13.4 0.4 

3 23.4 385.4 13.6 0.4 

4 23.1 373.5 13.1 0.4 

5 22.2 364.8 14 0.3 

6 22.3 386.2 14 0.4 

7 20.4 410.4 14 0.4 

8 20.2 403.2 16 0.4 

9 19.9 396.2 15.6 0.3 

10 19.8 406.9 16.6 0.3 

11 19.4 435.8 18.3 0.3 

12 23.6 436.9 15.3 0.4 

13 23.9 428.8 14.1 0.4 

14 19.5 423.3 14.4 0.3 

15 19.6 418.7 14.8 0.3 

16 23.7 429.2 14.4 0.3 

17 21.8 422.7 13.7 0.4 

18 26.5 466.5 14.7 0.3 

19 27.3 459.3 14.6 0.4 

20 27.8 449 13.9 0.3 

21 29.3 464 14 0.3 

22 27.4 432.5 13.6 0.4 

23 31.7 444.9 13 0.3 

24 27.3 440.1 11.5 0.4 

25 27.7 415.3 11.3 0.3 

26 28.5 444.3 10.9 0.3 

27 29.9 427.7 9.6 0.3 

28 27.6 423.6 9 0.3 

29 29.7 427.7 9 0.3 

30 28 426 10.1 0.3 

Average = 24.58 420.32 13.46 0.34 

/I 

.i 
Run #1 Interstate Brick - Kiln #3 Inlet 

Time 1551 Date 10/31 /95 

1 75.4 467.4 13.8 129.9 

2 76.6 451.2 12.8 138.4 

3 78.1 444.1 12.7 138.1 

4 77.9 442.2 12.7 138.2 

5 78.4 444.9 12.7 138.6 

6 79.8 460.7 13.3 132 

7 78.9 457 13.3 129.7 

8 79.5 462 13.2 129.9 

9 80.5 458.9 13.2 128 

10 81 464.1 13.5 124.4 

11 81.1 465.3 13.6 123.4 

.12 81.4 461 13.5 122.6 

13 80.9 465.7 13.5 122.7 

14 80.3 460.4 12.9 126.4 

15 80.7 453 12.8 128.4 

16 81.5 448.6 12.8 127.6 

17 80.3 451.6 12.8 125.4 

18 75.9 456.6 13.5 117.2 

19 77.9 465.3 13.4 114.8 

20 78.4 464.9 13.4 115 

21 77.4 467.2 13.4 115.6 

22 78.4 465.5 13.4 114.6 

23 79.8 473.2 13.4 115 

24 78.4 422.1 13.3 116.9 

25 72.1 460.3 13.4 121.4 

26 80.6 452.5 12.8 123.6 

27 80.9 444.9 12.7 127 

28 82.6 448.8 12.7 128 

29 77.5 444.3 12.7 128.2 

30 79.9 444.9 12.6 128 

n 

Average = 79.07 455.62 13.13 125.63 
Run #2 Interstate Brick - Kiln #3 Inlet 

1718 Date 10/31/95 

Minutes NOx c0 02 S02 

1 79.9 449.9 13.8 146.6 

2 80.6 447.2 12.6 146.1 

3 80.6 451.2 12.6 145.9 

4 79.5 449.9 12.4 146.3 

5 79.2 440.4 12 152.1 

6 78.8 437.6 12.1 152.3 

7 80.5 448.2 12.5 147.1 

8 78.1 451.4 14.2 146 

9 77.4 450.4 14.1 146.4 

10 77.1 450.5 14.1 146.4 

11 78.8 452.2 14.1 145.9 

12 79.3 451 14.2 145.4 

13 78 454.3 14.1 145.7 

14 78.5 447.4 14.1 145.4 

15 78.3 446.8 14.1 145.3 

16 78.3 447.7 14 145.5 

17 71.8 400.9 14 146.4 

18 76.6 452 14.6 139.3 

19 78.9 487.6 13.7 145.3 

20 79.5 429.1 13.5 150.6 

21 77.9 431.5 13.5 153.2 

22 75.7 430.7 13.5 153.2 

23 76 434.3 13.5 156.1 

24 75.9 443.8 14.1 150.6 

25 73 437.4 13.9 148.2 

26 75.6 452.7 14.2 149.3 

27 75.8 446 14.2 148.8 

28 75.7 448.3 14.2 148.7 

29 76.4 449.6 14.2 148.4 

30 73.8 441.4 13.8 151 

Average = 77.52 445.38 13.66 147.92 

19U 
Run #3 Interstate Brick - Kiln #3 Inlet 

Time 1828 Date 10/31 /95 

Minu#es NOx CO 02 S02 

1 68.3 447.5 13.5 138.8 

2 75.4 442.1 13.6 136.1 

3 78 435.7 13.5 140.8 

4 79.8 431.6 13.2 147.2 

5 81.9 425.3 13.2 151.4 

6 79.8 430.8 13.3 153.1 

7 80.5 441.8 13.8 150.3 

8 82.6 447 13.8 148.4 

9 82 445.3 13.8 148.2 

10 83.1 446.7 13.7 148.9 

11 82.4 449.3 13.7 148.9 

12 83.3 448.3 13.7 149.3 

13 85.4 452.8 14 146.1 

14 85 453.3 13.5 147.3 

15 84.6 445 13.3 151 

16 84.6 441.9 13.3 153.4 

17 83.9 439.3 13.3 154.7 

18 86.6 447 13.9 151.8 

19 85.9 451.3 13.9 148.1 

20 85.5 452.7 13.9 147.3 

21 85.2 455.4 13.9 147.5 

22 85.8 454.4 13.8 148 

23 85.4 454.5 13.8 148 

24 85.5 454.3 13.9 147.2 

25 83.3 459.4 13.9 146.5 

26 80.3 407.5 13.6 148 

27 76 458 14.2 144.1 

28 79.5 448.4 13.5 146.4 

29 79.9 438 13.2 154.4 

30 82.2 435 13.1 158.8 

Average = 82.06 444.65 13.63 148.33 
Appendix "H" 

(VEO Readings & Certification Cards) 

C4mczZcan Cr'nvizor_mEntaC Jrutjn9 (fom/zany -qnc. 

e/?tno, 9-140eniac, G"4zzzona esa`t -fa-G Cr.ty, rLta~ 

7o2-786-5553 6o2-253-3354 80i-266-7111 
Appendix "H" 

(VEO Readings & Certification Cards) 

IW~ 
o~ancsn ~v~ R, u.can aq.uuu 

an , gnr. 

SO1-266- 7111 ~ V/sible EmissJon FTsld Documentatlon 

SOURC AME SEC 

MIN 0 15 90 45 

LOCATIoN 

1 0 0 12 

MA/L/NG AD RESS 2 Ciry~ ~~STATE & Z1P 

PHONE I 

~O~ 2 ~o - ~ 

SOU CONTA T 

~~ ~ ~ 

4 O O O a 

5 

OBSERVAn N G4TE START TTME STOP T1ME 

6 

PROCESS EO MENT FUEL T-YPg 

CONTROL,EQJJIPMENT 

OPERATING MODE 

OPERATING MODE 

7 L14 

a 8 

9 

DESCR/BE EMISSlON POINT 10 

11 

HEIGHTABOVEGROUND LEVEL 

`f O t 

1-IEIGH7 RELAT/VE TD OBSERVER 

F / 12 

DlSTANCE FROM OBSERVER 

1--5—O / 

D1REC710N FROM OBSERVER 13 

14 

DESCRIBE EMISSlONS 

64,1 15 

EM1SSlON CO 

L1j ~ 

PLUMETYPE.• CONTlNUOU 

FUGITTVE D INTERM/TTENT Q 

18 

17 

WATER DROPLET5 PRESENT. 

NO O YESZ1r, 

IF WATER DROPLET PLUME: 

ATTACHED O DETACHED 18 

Point !n the Plume at Whfch Opacity was Determined 

~ 

19 

20 

DESCRIBE BACK OUND (Col r, etc.) 

21 

5KY C N fTIONS. D COLOR 

— 

WIND DIRECTION 

U C!~ 

W/ND SPEED 

/

D 

22 

~ 

AMB1ENiCpEMPERATU ~aE WET 8ULB TEMP. RH, perc nt 

24 

Stack SOURCE LAM7UTSXE1Cff D~ortn A~rvw 

with V 

Phm e 

Sun '~- ~ ~ 

Mnd 

x Iubn Pb,nt T~ 

25 

26 

27 

28 

~ 

~ • v 

Ru/tJon 

~ 140 , \ 0 

~ Sun Locatlon Une 

OBSERVE,;S J"E (,nq 

~ ~i22x .! 

DATE 

AVERAGE OPACITY FOR 

HIGHEST PERIOD 

COMMENTS (Describe Observatlon Pbint) 

~if~ _ ' /PLK/ 1~ ~ 

~ I CERTlFlED ~ ., •.~-~ 

J 

~^ (7 

G\~'[2RL~ /Z ~t7'[J~C, l.L L:1R Sq66o 

r 

So1-266-7111 

VTsrb/e E-rrlss/on F'•s/d aocJmentatlorr 

SCURCF NAME SFC 

~. I M1N 0 15 30 I 4'S 

LOCAT7CN f ~ , I ~ C 

MAIL:NG AOCRESS CITY 

! 

STATE & ZIP 

„ ~ 

~ 

PH NE ~NTACT °

I-SCUR

~ d

~ D / Z~n-~ C.~ • 

OBSEr-f VAT70p,CATc START TIlNE Si CP TIME 5I 0 I 

~ 

6 

PRCCy~ ~Et- ~fPM NT FUEL TY E OPErZ4T7NG MODE 7+ I ~ ( ~GL • ~ / 1" `~ 

~ 

CCNTRC ECUrP ENT OPERATING MODE 8 / ~U 

~ ~(~ rr C~(/ ~ r 9 G 

DE.SCRIB =HdIS iONPOfNT ~,/•M•//f 

r 'O 

I NEiGNT ABOVE GRCUNO LEYE! NEIGHT RELATlVE,.Tp OBSERVEA (f 

~ (A / 12 I --76 _ 3 I I 

DISTANCF FROM 08SFR}/ER D 

1

13 I I I 

DESCRIBE EM CNS 

E.'NlSSiON CO/ LOR 

1~ 

PLL/ME 7YPE CONTINUCUS.EE ~- 1 FUGl71VEC71N7E,-7MfT7E., vj [• 

16 

17 I I I I 

WATER DROPLEi S P.4ESE'VT. 

NO C! YES,Lr,-- I !F Wi47E,R OROPL r PLUME ATaACN DETACNE:? C 18 

N;irrt Irr the Plume at WMch Opacity w Determined / 

CESCa1BE ~ KGRCUND (C, rol l. I I ~ror tc.) 21 

SKYCCNDITT 5,ySANpCCWR 

r 

-WlND DlREf'•T/0N ~ WD ~ E=:7 ~ I I I I 

81EN7 T PERATURE RN. perzent 

S ~ 

WET 8UL9 T E.'bIP. 

4~~)ro /r 24 

sraex ~ SOURCS LAtC!!T SKE'CJ•J Oraw Nonn Arrow 

with 

Sune'~" 

-----~r " ~ ~ r 

MnQ 

 

0 

ssfort Polnt 

2-4 ( ~ ' I I 

27 I I I 

28 ~ I 

29 I 

I 

I I 

30 I I 

AVEr?AGE OPACITY FOR 

CCMME.'VTS (G'esc: ibe OOserratlon Fbintl 

O~trtd 7t Surt Locatlon Urne 

C6SE7 GNATURE I DA EL7~~ 

CRG IZ-.%T7CN/~ , ~ --- CERT; F c'C 3Y~ / CA_ 

` ~,;. /-,,..: o••~-- . l ,c~,-E~-t- ~, -L- f ~ . I 

~~~ ~y'` ( <""/'/~ ~ ~ ~~/~7 ' ~~ I, ~ 
CARL KOONI—Z ASSOCIA-SS 

STa-= OF UTAH 

DIVIS;CN CF AIR GUALITY 

ot Nasinville. 7er.r.essee Trus c:r::ties :nat JOF:'—~ s ~T, uj,' , cT 

success:ully par c:pated in Visible Emissions 

training on ~~ 4-{ s—199s 

and is Gualitied to e ~ aivate Visible Emissions 

tor a period of six (6) mcnths trom the date ot 

certiticat4on. 

Instructor I ~ 

This is to ac:<nowledse that 

V. LQEr<l~ r cnlSO ~C~ has succ=sstuli,v ccimpieseci :7e VPsil:le =:nissions cvai;:a::c 

C:.urse cancuc:ed !:v te Oivisicn oi Air Cuality ar.d has .-et : ~ 

minin'.L'm reclAren7ent. r1eCe55aPil :0 evaluate vi5.`'•ie emis3::..'• 

acccrctng CO C?A ~et32C?C lj 

. i•~ 

r 

Oirec:cr. Givisicn ot Air Cualiry 

Valid until C-CT 1 1 1595 

S"ATE CF UTAH 

DIVIS;CN aF AIR CUALIT`! 

This c2miies ;hat JD SC s=-- 

has sucC22s:uily ccmcietea !he `i's;c,e _-ussionsE•raluaticn 

Caurse cancuc:ea tv :ne Divis:cn ct Air Cuaut v anc nas r,tet :ne 

minimum reouirements necsssari :a evaivate visibie emissions. 

ac _rcing :o E?.a 

pirec 'r. Oivisian at air Cuauty 

rs9+r cqq 

Validunni uL ~ 1 ~ ~7 '" 

STATE CF UTAH 

DIVIS;CN CF AIR CUALITY 

This =ar::'ies :rat QICa H.a[v 'K=:`dS 

has sL;c:2ss:J1lv =mcleSeC :tte '/istbie = ~r:issccns 'E :aiu'a';- 

Ccurse .cncuc:ec !:v :ne Oivis;cn et Air Cuaiiri ana -as -e: .` 

r-fn:r:u.- recuirements nec2esarj to evatuate vis:cie amiss:cr. 

acccrcing :a c?A .M/etr.cG/?.:! ,;~, 

Girec:or. Division ot Air Cuariry 

valic unnlI(;~7 1 1 41995 

STATE CF UTAH S TATE OF UTAH 

DIVISaON OF AIFi QUALITY DIVISICN CF AIR CUALITY 

T his cerufies : ~at ToD D BEiSON This cani6es ,hatR`!A.`l 3EVcOy 

has succssstullv czmpleted the VisiGle E:nissions Evaluatian 

Course conduc ec cy :ne Oivision or Air Cuaiity anc thas met tne 

mirtimum recuirementa nec=ssary tc evatuate •rismfe emissions. 

acccrctng to E?A ,~rtl:" .e -~

~--~~~u..,~ 

Cirec:or. Givisicn at A;r Cuaiity 

'' Vait c untd ~ f" 1 1 1995 

has succassrully cemcieted :::a Visii:le Ernissions 

Czurse ccnduc:ed --y the Civtsicn ct ;;ir Cuaiiri anc ias •-e: 

minimum recuirements necessarv ta evatuate vis:cie :rn;ss:c 

acccrei-a :0 E?A 

.,•.~.~-~~'~ ~~1C 

Cirec:cr. =ivis:cn ct Air Cuaury 

Vaiic untii 0rT I 1 19 51 
Appendix "I" 

(Calibration Data) 

m 
Appendix „1,. 

(Calibration Data) 

c4mEti.can EnvZzonmentaf 9FS.tin9 Com ~any gnc. 

e `eno, 'cN'cvada. -IPfioanix, OTZi.zona csaCt -fake eity, '-Uta4 

7o2-786- 6o2-2253-3354 8oi-266-7111 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111 

POSTTEST DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

(English Units) 

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number Plant 

11 /2-95 25.18 CR (097) Interstate Brick 

West Valley, Utah 

Calibrated Bv Pretest Yi Avera4e Yi Low Span High Span 

JPB 1.07 1.093 1.017 1.124 

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter QH/13.6 Wet TEst Meter 

Setting AH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

2.00 10.94 10 70 0.14706 70 

70 

2.00 10.97 10.01 71 0.14706 71 

71 

2.00 11.01 10 71 0.14706 71 

71 

Inlet 

(Td i) °F 

70 

71 

71 

71 

72 

72 

Dry Gas Meter 

Outlet 

(Td o) °F 

70 

72 

72 

72 

73 

74 

Average 

(Td) °F 

70.75 

71.50 

72.75 

Time 0 

Minutes 

11.9 

11.95 

11.95 

Yi 

1.089 

1.091 

1.098 

Average Yi 

1.093 

Post Test Temperature Check 

Reference: ERTCO Hg Thermometer 

Meter Box: CR #1(097) Sample Box: CR#1 A 

Meter Box Reference Sample Box Reference 

Meter In: 71 71 Impinger In: 240 241 

Meter Out: 70 71 Impinger Out: 45 46 

Oven: 244 244 

~ I~ 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111 

POSTTEST DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

(English Units) 

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number Plant 

11/2-95 25.18 UT #790-484 Interstate Brick 

West Valley, Utah 

Calibrated By Pretest Yi Averacqe Yi Low Span High Span 

JPB 0.985 0.991 0.936 1.034 

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter AH/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting OH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

2.00 9.91 9.98 69 0.14706 69 

69 

2.00 9.94 10 69 0.14706 69:5 

70 

2.00 10.01 10.05 70 0.14706 70 

70 

Dry Gas Meter 

Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 

(Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi 

69 69 69.25 10.04 0.988 

69 70 

70 71 70.75 10.05 0.991 

70 72 

71 73 72.00 10.04 0.994 

71 73 

Average Yi 

0.991 

Post Test Temperature Check , 

Reference: ERTC.O Hg Thermometer 

Meter Box: UT 790-484 Sample Box: UT #1 A 

Meter Box Reference Sample Box Reference 

Meter In: 69 69 Impinger In: 235 235 

Meter Out: 69 70 Impinger Out: 70 70 

Oven: 235 236 

~~ \ 
Amaerican EnvironmQntal Testing Company, Inc_ 

WZ Sa uth Birch D rfive 

Spanish Foric, Utah 84500 

(801) 256-7111 

Cnmpany:_ 015L, /~~/^ ~ Date: /C' 

Soures: 'e-2 ~ ~~LZI" Calibrated By: hl 

NOZZLB CALIBRATION 

Nozzie Di D2 Ds AD D average 

Icentfflcatton (1n. ) (in. ) (in. ) (In. ) 

Number ' 

~r 

S~ ~~'/~ ~/ ~- ~~J. v v 0 

31,-Z 

~a ~ 

6, 31,~- c~ - voa 

where: 

D1,2,3 = Nozzie diameter mea3ured on a difterent diameter, (in.). 

Tolerance = mea3ure withln 0.001 lnches (0.25 mm). 

LD = ~ x9m um difiarence In any two measurement3, (in. ). 

Tolerance =0.004 Incfie3 (0.1 mm). 

D averace - Average of DY, D2, Ds. 

a~~ 
2 4~j 

~ 

~ 

, 

Amefican Environmental Testing Company, Inc_ 

585 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 256-7111 

Company: Date: - 

• = ~ .. ,_ . . Calibrated By: 

NOZZLE CALIBRATION 

Nozzle Di D2 Ds aD D average 

Identiflcat(on (in. ) (in. ) (In. ) (in. ) 

Number ` 

3 ~ 

3 ~ 

0. 36''P O. Oca o o, 

Where : 

D1,2,3 = Nozzle diameter measured on a different diameter, (in.). 

Tolerance = measure within 0.001 inches (0.25 mm). 

AD = Maxim um difTerence In any two measurements, (in. ). 

Tolerance =0.004 Inches (0.1 mm). 

D ave rage = A rerage of Dt, D2, Ds. 

a~3 
American Environmental Tesiing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utan 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801 ) 266-7 1 1 1 

Meter Box Calibration Data Form 

(Enclish Units) 

Date Barometric oressur= ~i e._ ror= • .cx Jurr.cer 

9/2,'95 25.62 UT 790-484 

Ave-aae Yi Average ^_H Cafibrated 5v Std. Me*_er Yi 

0.985 1.719 BA,I. - GE1 0.99497 

-•Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter C.H/ i 3.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting CH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) F0 (Tw) 'F Average Temp. 

0.50 4.84 5 72 0.03676 71 

72 

1.00 4.88 5 73 0.072 53 72 

f 73 

1.50 9.62 10 73 0.1 1029 70 

s 

77 

2.00 9.7 Z 10 71 0.1 4-, 06 73 

73 

3.00 9.79 10 73 0.22-059 73 

73 

4.00 9.78 10 74 Z 74 

74 

Dry Gas yteter 

Inlet Outlet Ave.-ace Time 0 

(Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) 'F Minutes Yi AH 

70 77 74.25 11.23 0.96'76 1.7573 

71 79 

71 83 78.25 8.15 0.917 97 1.8147 

72 87 

73 92 84.25 12.54 0.9787 1.6277 

74 98 

75 100 88.00 11.08 0.9887 1.6670 

75 102 

76 104 91.25 9.05 0.9988 1.6347 

78 107 

79 108 94.25 8.25 0.9485 1.81 ZO 

81 109 

Averace Yi Average AH 

0.985 1.719 

aDq 
Arne-;can Environmental Testing Ccr^cany, Inc. 

565 Scuth Birc:i Drive Soanisn Foric. Utan 31660 

(801) 798-8553 (301) 266-71 11 

Pitot Tube Caiibration Form 

ptot T ube Identincation Vur^oer s' - 8 Date. 0i4 c 

Calibrated 84 VS8-768 

"A" 51de Caiibration 

Run Number P std P s Co Deviation 

cm H20 cm H20 (S) 

. (inches H20) (incfies H20) 

1 0.36 0.475 0.37C6 -0.00062 

2 0.355 0.46 0.8785 0.00730 

3 0.355 0.175 0.86=+5 -0.00668 

Average: 0.8712 

: "6" Side Ca(ibration 

Run Number P std P s CP Deviation 

c.-n H20 cm H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0•305 0.435 0.8675 0.00596 

2 0.36 0.19 0.8571 -0.004-It1 

3 0.355 0.1,? 0.8600 -0.00156 

Avecage: 0.8615 

A & 8 Average = 0.3664 

~ 

R~ ~ 
American Environmental Testing C::T:pany, Inc. 

Sc5 Scuth Birch Drive Spanish Fcric, Utah 84600 

(801) 793-8553 (801) 2c6-71 1 1 

Meter Box Calibration Data Fcrrn 

(Enciish Units) 

Oate Barcmetric P-essure Ntecz.► gcx yur-ler 

9/22/95 25.54 RAC 45-509 

Average Yi Average CH Calibrted Bv Std, Meter Yi 

0.985 1.812 VBB - RSS 0.99497 

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter CHi 13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting CH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

0.50 4.85 5 70 0.03676 63 

71 

1.00 4.81 5 70 0.07353 63 

 _1 71 

1.50 9.711 10 70 0.11029 63 

71 

2.00 9.633 10 69 0.117 06 6c 

70 

3.00 9.453 10 69 0.2-2059 67 

70 

4.00 9.469 10 70 0.29412 63 

71 

Dry Gas Meter 

(nlet Cutlet Average Time 0 

(Td i) -F (Td o) 'F (Td) °F lviinutes Yi CH 

71 75 73.50 11.14 0.9733 1.7109 

72 76 

72 78 76.00 8.09 0.9639 1.8262 

74 80 

76 85 82.25 12.89 0.98^00 1.6865 

79 89 

83 96 91.00 11.55 0.9996 1.7870 

85 100 

87 107 98.00 9.57 0.9879 1.8975 

89 109 

91 113 102.50 8.46 0.9923 1.9642 

92 114 

Average Yi Average CH 

0.985 1.812 

aD b 
Americ:3n Environmen[al Testing Ccr':pany, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utah 81600 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 260-71 1 1 

Meter Box Calibrrtion Oata Fcr.m 

(Engiish Units) 

Dace Barcme*.ric Pressure NteTer gox ^1u;r,i:=r 

9i 2Z/95 25.54 RAC R2321 

Ave.raQe Y Average IH tafibrted Ev Std. .Me*_er Yi 

0.910 1.630 VBB - R8B 0.99497 

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter aH/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting &H (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) 'F Ave age Temp. 

0.50 4.57 5 69 0.03676 69 

69 

,. 1.00 4.58 5 70 0.07353 69.5 

-' 69 

1.50 8.91 10 70 0.11029 70 

70 

; 2.00 8.901 ' 10 71 0.1 s706 70.5 

70 

3.00 8.34 10 69 0Z205? 69.5 

70 

4.00 8.329 10 71 0.29-412 70.5 

70 

Dry Gas Meter 

tniet Cudet Ave age Time 0 

(Td i) 'F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi CH 

71 70 70.50 9.88 0.9107 1.5301 

70 71 

71 77 74.50 7.19 • 0.9171 1.6045 

72 78 

74 87 82.25 11.83 0.9031 1.7002 

76 92 

78 96 88.00 10.09 0.10096 1.6382 

80 98 

82 101 92.25 8.324 0.9095 1.6762 

84 102 

86 104 95.25 7.104 0.9090 1.6292 

88 103 

Average Yi Average CH 

0.910 1.630 

.~..!~i 
American Environmentai Testing Ccmpany, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Soanisb Forlc, Utan 84660 

(201) 793-8553 (201) 256-7 1 1 1 

Meter Box Cafibraticn Data Fcrni 

(Enciisb Units) 

Cate Barome*.ric P'?ssure iVlptpr bCK "JLr"CF.' 

9!2/95 25.61 CR r"r(097) 

Averaqe Yi Average CH Calibrated Bv Std. Meter Yi 

1.070 1.883 VBS - .1P3 0.99497 

Orfice Manometes Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Tesz Meter CH/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting CH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Averace Tesnp. 

0.50 5.42 5 70 0.03676 70 

70 

1.00 5.517 5 71 0.07353 71 

_r 71 

1.50 10.64 10 72 0.11029 72 

72 

2.00 10.71 10 73 0.1-' ~ 06 73 

73 

3.00 10.84 10 73 0.22059 73 

73 

4.00 10.83 10 74 0.29=' 12 74 

74 

Dry Gas Meter 

Iniet Cuttet Average Time 0 

(Td i) °F (Td o) 'F (Td) °F Nlinutes Yi CH 

70 69 69.75 12 . 75 1.0765 1.8160 

70 70 

71 70 70.75 9.18 1.0942 1.8207 

71 71 

71 72 71.75 14.71 1.0536 1.8889 

72 72 

71 72 72.00 12.96 1.0575 1.9358 

72 73 

72 73 72.50 10.9 1.0683 2.0031 

72 73 

73 74 73.50 9.05 1.0692 1.8310 

73 74 

Average Yi Average aH 

1.070 1.883 

aa ~/ 
American Environmentai Testing Corr.rany, Inc. 

565 Scuth 6irch Drive Soanisii Fcr;c. l:tah 84660 

(801) 798-3553 (801) 266-71 1 1 

Pitot Tube Caiibraticn Fcrm 

pitct TubP fdentincsticn Numrer 6' 

Cafibrated 8v: VBB - tbb 

"A" Side Caiibration 

Run yumber P std p s Cr Deviation 

cm H20 cm H20 (5) 

(inc.'ies H20) (in&es H20) 

1 0.31 0.47 0.8121 -0.00290 

2 0.32 0.48 0.8165 0.00145 

3 0.32 0.48 0.8165 0.00145 

Average: 0.8150 

"6" Sice Caiibrrticn 

Run Number P std P s CP Deviation 

: c.-n H20 c.:. H20 (S) 

(inc.hes H20) (inc:~ es H20) 

1 0.32 0.18 0.3165 0.005.=8 

2 0.3Z 0.49 O.8C31 -0.00279 

3 0.32 0.=9 0.3081 -0.002-79 

Average: 0.8109 

A & 8 Average = 0.8130 

Pti 
American Environmental Testing Cor^Oany, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Forlc. Utan 84660 

(801 ) 798-3553 (301) 256-71 1 1 

Pitct Tube C.;iibration Form 

, Pitot T uce Identificaticn Vumber: 6' - 6 

Calibrated BY' V66 - rbb 

"A" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std p s 

cm H20 c.-n H20 

(inches HZO) (inr-~ es H20) 

1 0.31 0.43 

Z 0.31 0.4; 

3 0.31 0.43 

Averaae: 

"5" Side Caiibraticn 

Run Number P std P s 

crn H2O cm H20 

(indhes H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.32 0.4S 

2 0.31 0. ~~ 

3 0.31 O.=Z 

Average: 

Cat° . 

0,7i0 

--- 

Cp De ~riat;on 

(5) 

0.8=° 1 0.00000 

0.3491 0.00000 

0.8491 0.00000 

0.3491 

Cp De,,iaticn 

(S) 

0.°433 -0.00722 

0.8=91 -0.00142 

0.859, 0.00363 

0.3505 

A & B Average = 0.8498 

C~,/D 
American Environment.;f Testing Comcany. Inc. 

505 South Birch Drive Spanish For;c, l;tah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-17 1, 1 1 

Pitot Tube Calibration Form 

Ptct T ube ICentincation Number 6' - T Date• 9/23i95 

Caiibrated By- RBB - JP3 

"A" Side Calibration 

Run Number P std P s CY Deviaticn 

cm H20 c:n H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.29 0.42 0.8309 -0.00288 

2 0.3 0.43 0.8353 0.00144 

3 0.3 0.43 0.8353 0.00144 

. --- Average: 0.3338 

"B" Sice Calibraticn 

Run Number P stc} P s Cz Deviaticn 

c.-n H20 c.m H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches HZO) 

1 0.295 0.43 0.°283 -0.00306 

2 0:3 0.435 0.°305 -0.00088 

3 0.3 0.43 O.S353 0.00393 

Average: 0.8313 

A & B Average = 0.8326 

9,0 
American Environment.;i Testing Ccmcany, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork. Utah 84660 

(301) 798-3553 (801) 266-71 11 

Pitot Tube Caiibration Form 

Pitot Tube Identincatfon Numbe.•- 6' - 0 Date: 9/30/ 0 C _ 

Caiibrated 6v- V68 - JDS 

"A" Side Caiibration 

Run Number P std p s C:. Deviaticn 

cm H20 cn H20 (5) 

(inr-~ es H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.28 0.37 0.8699 0.00072 

2 0.28 0.375 0.8641 -0.005 T 0 

3 0.29 0.38 0.8736 0.00439 

= Average: 0.8692 

"B" Side Calibraticn 

Run Number P std P s CP Deviaticn 

cm H20 c.;i HZO (S) 

(inc.hes H20) (inc.hes H20) 

1 0.2° 0.375 0.°6-1 1 0.00250 

2 0.23 0.38 0.9584 -0.00311 

3 0.275 0.3 -7 0.3621 0.00053 

Average: 0.8615 

A & 8 Average = 0.8654 

a1v 
Ame.-ican Environmenta( Testing ComPany, Inc. 

565 South Birc:; Drive Spanis5 Fcrk, Utan 84660 

(301) 798-3553 (301 ) 266-71 1 1 

Pitot Tube Caiibration Fcrr;t 

Pitct Tube Identincaticn Numeer- s' - T Date:°!;r;/oc 

CaiiTrrated Bv: JPa - JPH 

"A" Side Cafibraticn 

Run Number P std p s CP Deviation 

; Crn H20 cm HZO (S) 

(inches H20) (inc.hes H20) 

1 0.37 0.49 0.8690 0.00053 

2 0.38 0.5 0.8718 0.00334 

3 0.37 0.495 0.8646 -0.00387 

' Average: 0.8634 

• 'B" Side Caiibraticn 

Run Numbe.► P std P s CP Deviaticn 

. c:n H20 cm H20 (5) 

(in&es H20) (inGhes HZ4) 

1 0.365 0.=8 0.8720 0.00055 

2 0.37 0.49 0.8690 -0.00251 

3 0.37 0. ~ 35 0.8731 0.001 96 

Average: 0.8715 

A & 6 Average = 0.8700 

1>0 
American Environment.:l Testing Ccr^panY, Inc. 

565 South Birc-h Drive Spanisti For'•<, Utan 84660 

(801) 798-35.53 (801) 256-71 1 1 

Pitot Tube Caiibraticn Forr.-I 

Pitcr Tube Ide.n.tin`caticn Numbe- S' - a ('a[ ~ ' ai2 ,•~ oc 

Caiibrated Bw R$8 - tbb 

"A" Side GGbraticn 

Run Number P std p s C? Deviaticn 

crn HZO cm HZO (S) 

(inc.ties H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.3 0.4 0.8660 -0.00117 

2 0.3 0.4 0.8660 -0.00117 

3 0.31 0.41 0.8695 0.00234 

._ Average: 0.8672 

"6" Side Caiibraticn 

Run Number p std p s CP Deviaticn 

c.-n H20 c.-n H20 (Si 

(inches H20) (inc5es H20) 

1 0.31 0.=1 0.26-a 5 -0.00243 

2 0.3 0.4 0.2660 -0.00594 

3 0.31 0.4 0.3803 0.0083 7 

Average: 0.8720 

A & B Average = 0.8696 

,~_rq 
American Environmental Testing Ccmpany, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Soanish For'<, Utan 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 256-71 1 1 

Pitot Tube Caiibraticn Form 

P+tot TubP Identin'catfon Number: 8' - B Qate:9" 0 i11- 5 

Caiibrated By: RS RH 

»A" Side Caiibration 

Run Nurnber P std P s C:, Deviaticn 

r.n H20 cm H20 (5) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.29 0.4 0.8515 0.00068 

2 0.285 0.395 0.8494 -0.00136 

3 0.29 0.4 0.8515 0.00063 

.r Average: 0.8508 

"o" Side Caiibraticn 

Run Number P std P s CP Deviaticn 

cm H20 c.-n H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inc:hes H20) 

1 029 0.8623 0.00612 

2 0.235 0.395 0.3494 -0.0067< 

3 0.29 0.395 0.3503 0.00065 

Average: 0.8562 

A & B Average = 0.8535 

/ 

til'~ 
American Environmental Testing Ccmpany, Inc. 

505 Scuth Birch Drive Spanish Fork, t.Itan 84660 

(301) 798-3553 (301) 256-7 1. 11 

Pitot Tube Caiibration Farm 

F;t^t Tube identincaticn VumEer• 8' - C 

Caiibrated Bv: RB RH 

_ z Da ~~ • 4 /20io: 

"A" Side Caiibration 

Run Number P stC P s Co Deviation 

cm H2O crn H20 (5) 

(incties H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.25 0.36 0.8498 0.00156 

2 0.25 0.35 0.8452 -0.00312 

3 0.26 0.36 0.8111?98 0.00156 

 _ Average: 0.8433 

"B" Side Caiioration 

Run Number P std P s Cr Ce•liation 

c:Tt H2O CT HZ' 0 ( ~ ) 

(inches H20) (inches H2O) 

1 0.255 0.353 0.8 47 5 -0.00228 

2 0.25 0.36 o.8 ~ 9a 0.00002 

3 0.263 0.36: 0.35 ~ 1 0.00226 

Average: 0.8498 

A & B Average = 0.8490 

gIb 
American Environmental Testing C:rnP;r.y, Inc. 

565 Scut.ti Birc:i Drive Spanisti F.ric, Utah 84600 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 250-71 1 1 

Pitot Tube Caiibratfcn Fcm 

Pitot Tube Identificstion Vurrber. 11' -A Dat3:9i29i 1-1 5 - 

Calibrated Sv: 188 ,/68 

"A" Side Calibraticn 

Run Number P std P s CIP. Deviaticn 

crn H20 c.-n H20 (S) 

(inches H24) (inches H20) 

1 0.36 0.51 0.8402 0.00194 

2 0.36 0.51 S 0.3361 -0.00215 

3 0.355 0.505 0.8384 0.00021 

' — Average: 0.8332 

"c" Side Calicracicn 

Run Number P std P s Co Deviaticn 

c.-n H20 c.-n H20. (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.365 0.52 0.3373 -0.00163 

Z 0-337 O.SZ5 0.83 0-5. 0.00001 

3 0.375 0.53 0.3-1 12 0.00167 

Average: 0.3395 

A & B Average = 0.8389 

10 
American Envircnment.;l Testing Comeany, Inc. 

563 Scuth Birc.h Drive Spanisn Fcr'.t, Utah 81660 

(201) 798-3553 (801) 256-71 1 1 

Pitot T ube Calibraticn Fcrm 

Pitot Tube Identific3ticn Number! 1 1' - 6 p;, 2' /QC 

Calibrated By: T3B - JP3 

"A" Side Caiibraticn 

Run Number P std P s CP De-riaticn 

crn H20 c.-n H20 (S) 

(inches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.31 0.45 0.8300 0.00142 

2 0.31 0.45 0.8300 0.00142 

3 0.3 0.41 0.8257 -0.00285 

_ Average: 0.8286 

"8" Side CaPibraticn 

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviaticn 

cm H20 c.-n H20 (S) 

(inc.ties H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.3 0.=:='. 0.2Z57 0.00165 

2 0.3 0.15 0.3165 -0.00757 

3 0.31 0.45 0.8300 0.005o2 

Average: 0.8241 

A & B Average = 0.8263 

aa' 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-71 1 1 

Meter Box Calibration Data Form 

(English Units) 

Date Barometric Pressure Me*.er Box Nur^ber 

9/2/95 25.61 CR #(097) 

Average Yi Averag,e AH Calibrated By Std. Meter Yi 

1.070 1.883 VBB - JPB 0.99497 

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter LH/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting AH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

0.50 5.42 5 70 0.03676 70 

70 

1.00 5.517 5 71 0.07353 71 

' 71 z 

1.50 10.64 10 72 0.11029 72 

72 

2.00 10.71 10 73 0.14706 73 

73 

3.00 10.84 10 73 0.22059 73 

73 

4.00 10.88 10 74 0.29412 74 

74 

Dry Gas Meter 

Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 

(Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi &H 

70 69 69.75 12.75 1.0765 1.8160 

70 70 

71 70 70.75 9.18 1.0942 1.8207 

71 71 

71 72 71.75 14.71 1..0536 1.8889 

72 72 

71 72 72.00 12.96 1.0575 1.9358 

72 73 

72 73 72.50 10.9 1.0683 2.0031 

72 73 

73 74 73.50 9.05 1.0692 1.8310 

73 74 

Average Yi Average AH 

1.070 1.883 

~-1q 
Ame^icart Environmencal Testina Ccrrpany, Inc. 

565 Scuth Birch Drive Spanish Fcric, Utah 8-1660 

(301) 798-3553 (80 i) 2 ~ 0-71 1 1 

Pitot Tube Calibration Forrn 

pitot Tube Ic'e.^.tincaticn Number• a 

Calibrated Bv' V88 - rbb 

"A" Side Caiibration 

Run Number p stc p s 

cm HZO c.mz H20 

(inches H20) (inc.hes H20) 

1 0.3 0.47 

2 0.3 0.47 

3 0.3 0.46 

' Average: 

"6" Side Caiibraticn 

Run Number p std p s 

cm H20 cm H20 

(inc.hes H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.31 0.47 

2 0.17 

3 0.31 0.47 

Average: 

Dnte: o:Z ,n5 

Cp Ceviation 

(S) 

0.7989 -0.00288 

0.7989 -0.00288 

0.8076 0.00576 

0.8018 

CP Ceviaticn 

(5) 

0.3121 0.004=0 

0.7989 -0.00830 

0.3121 0.00"1 --0 

0.8077 

A & 5 Average = 0.8048 
Ame.-iccn Environment.at Testing Ccr'--any, Inc. 

565 Sccth Birch Drive Spanisb Fori<, l.'tan 846v0 

(301) 798-3553 (801) 256-71 11 

Pitot Tube Caiiirration Form 

Pitct Tube 'dentincaticn Vumber: =' - C Date: a/?Oi 95 

Caiibrrated Bvc. VB RBB 

"A" Side Calibratfon 

Run Number P stc p s Cc Deviaticn 

cm H20 c.m H20 (S} 

(inches H20) (Inc:nes H20) 

1 0.36 0.495 0.8523 -0.00053 

2 0.365 0.5 0.8544 0.00107 

3 0.36 0.495 0.8528 -0.00053 

~ Average: 0.8533 

"o" Side Calibraticn 

Run Number P std P s Cp Ceviaticn 

crn H20 c.-n H20 (S) 

(inc7es H20) (incties H20) 

1 0.36 0.5 0.3435 -0.00087 

2 0.355 0.=95 0.3-1 69 -0.0025-1 

3 0.36 0.195 0.8523 0.00341 

Average: 0.8494 

A & B Average = 0.8514 

~..~-1 
American Environment:,i Te=ting ComFany, Inc. 

563 Scuth Birch Drive Spanis ~: Fork. Dtun 84660 

(801) 79fi-35:,3 (301 ) 256 -7 1 1 1 

Stac:< Temperature Sensor Caiibrat:cn Fcrm 

ibe-mcccuple uurmber: =1 Cicitai -= 2 Cmec3 C':te• 3- . c= 

Barcr-e*^c Pressure: 25.7" 

:afibrated Sv- JDS - RPU Re;.erence: ERTCO -M.g - Ciass 

Reference Pcint Source a Reference Tnermcc--upie Temperature 

Number (spe:''ry) Therrncmeter Pctertticmeter Difference b 

Temperature °F Te.•rperature °F % 

a) Ice Water 34 35 -0.33 

rr1 b) Hot H2'J 140 141 -0.24 

Digital c) Boiiing H20 215 211 0.20 

d) Warm Oil 254 253 -0.19 

, e) Hot Oil 398 3

06 0.30 

f) .Bciiing Gil 398 401 -0.45 

a) Ice Wat_°r 35 36 -0.32 

~2 b) Hct H20 1=6 1=3 -0.13 

Ome7a c) Bciiing H20 204 202 0.=11 2 

d) Warm Oii 233 235 -O.sO 

e) Hct Cii 379 373 0.46 

f) Bciiing Gii 3 7 2 3 ,70 0.31 

i Type of caiibratien system used. 

~ (reference temp. 'C + 273) -(test thermcmeter ternp. °C + 2 7 3) * 100< 1.5?% 

reference temperature °C + 273 

m 
Americ3n Environmental Testing Comcany, Inc. 

505 South Birch Orive Spanish Fork, l;tah 84660 

(IOJO1 ) 798-3553 (301) 266-71 1 1 

Sample Bcx Temperature Sensor Caiibraticn Fcrm 

SamCIP, Box Uurnbe!: CRT'r1 (JT T'.4 - Q.AC C !i%a [tiat°• 3^., C C 

Barcrne*-jc Pressure: 2 c c ~ 

Calibrated 8v: VBB - JPB Re*ere.^.ce: ERTCO - 105 - SyBS 

Reference Point Source a Reference Therr;zccauple Temperature 

Number (spe::fij) T'ne.rmome+:er Potenticmeser DifiPerence b 

Temperature °F Temperature 'F °ro 

3 Oven On 250 251 -0.19 

CR 4 Oven On 244 247 -0.58 

#1A 2 Oven Cn 2 ~ 6 234 0.39 

1 Cold H20 54 55 -0.31 

8 Oven Cn 57 56 0.30 

7 Oven On 59 53 0.30 

3 Oven On 247 2=:6 0.19 

UTa 4 Oven Cn 243 2=1 -0.19 

#1 A 2. Cven On 239 2-0 -0.20 

1 Ccld H20 46 47 -0.31 

8 Oven Cn 5; 57 -0.61 

7 Cven On 61 60 0.30 

3 Oven Cn 213 0.19 

RAC 4 Oven On 254 253 -0.19 

#1A 2 Oven Cn 236 237 -0.20 

1 Cold H20 56 57 -0.30 

8 Oven On 60 61 -0.30 

7 Oven On 63 62 030 

3 Oven On 241 24"' -0.58 

RAC 4 Oven On 24-'. 211 0.53 

#2A 2 Oven On 20 240 -75.09 

1 Ccld H20 S4 5 5 -0.31 

8 Oven Cn 53 53 -0.61 

7 Oven On 61 60 0.30 

a Type of calibration system used. 

b(reference temp. °C + 273) -(test thermometer te.rnp. °C + 273) * 100< 1.59'0 

reference temperature 'C + 273 

Ol 2-27 
Americ:,n Envircnmental Testing Corncany, Inc. 

SoS Scut,ti Birch Crive Spanish For'<, l:tah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 250-71 1 1 

Baiance Calibration Cata Form 

Baiance Vame: Ohaus GA - 200 S2 (anaivticai) Nurnrrer :1 707 

Balance Name:Me**!er - 88 - 3000 r700 Lcaderl Numoer :K6888 

Ciassincation of Standard Weiahts: Tvoe "S" W.B.S. Anafvst: JOS 

A 200 5 Ohaus GA - 200 S2 

Oate 0.500 a 1.0000 a 10.0000 a 50.0000 a 100.0000 a 

3/2/94 0.500 1.0001 10.0001 50.0002 100.0002 

9/6/94 0.500 1.0000 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 

3/3/95 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0000 100.0000 

. 9/22/95 

1 

0.50001 0.9999 10.0001 49,9998 

U 3600 blettie ► - 68 - 3C00 

date 0.500 a 1.0000 a 10.0000 a 50.0000 g 100.0000 a 

3/2/94 0.5 1.0 10.0 50.1 100.1 

9/6/94 0.5010 1.OG01 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000 

3/3/95 0.5000 1.0001 10.0000 50.0000 100.0001 

~ aq 
American Environmentai Testin, Cor.-cany, Inc. 

565 Scuth Birc-i Drive Soanisn For<, Utan 840'60 

(801) 798-3553 (301) 266-7 i 11 

Baiance Calibration Data Form 

Bsiance Name• Satcrus - 4 700 S lum:•e• • 35;1ZC-r5--- _- 

Balance Name: Satorius - U3600 (Too Loacer) Numoer : 351 20087 _-- 

c'rassificaticn of Standard Weiqhts: Tvpe "S" W.B.S. ,nnaivst: JPB - RH 

A 200 S 

Date 0.500 a 1.0000 a 10.0000 a 50.0000 a 100.0000 a 

3/2/94 0.500 0.9999 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 

9/6/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000 

3/3/95 0.5000 1.0001 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 

9/2/95 0.5 1.0001 10 50 

U 3600 

Date 0.500 a 1.0000 a 10.0000 cr 50.Q000 a 100.0000 a 

3/2/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.1000 

9/6/94 0.501 1.0010 10.0000 50.0001 100-0001 

3/3/95 0.5000 1.00 10.00 50.00 100.00 

tl a5 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 260-7111 

Meter Box Calibration Data Fcrm 

(English Units) 

Date Barome*ric Pressure Meter Box Number 

9/22/95 25.54 RAC #145-569 

Average Yi Average aH Calibrated By Std. Meter Yi 

0.985 1.812 VBB - RBB 0.99497 

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter CH/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting AH (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

0.50 4.85 5 70 0.03676 68 

71 

_ 1.00 4.81 5 70 0.07353 68 

 _ 71 

1.50 9.711 10 70 0.11029 68 

71 

2.00 9.683 10 69 0.14706 63 

70 

3.00 9.458 10 69 0.22059 67 

70 

4.00 9.469 10 70 0.29412 63 

71 

Dry Gas Meter 

Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 

(Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi AH 

71 75 73.50 11.14 0.9738 1.7109 

72 76 

72 78 76.00 8.09 0.9639 1.8262 

74 80 

76 85 82.25 12.89 0.9880 1.6865 

79 89 

83 96 91.00 11.55 0.9996 1.7870 

85 100 

87 107 98.00 9.57 0.9879 1.8975 

89 109 

91 113 102.50 8.46 0.9923 1.9642 

92 114 

Average Yi Average Z~ H 

0.985 1.812 
Company: Interstate Bricfc 

Source: Kiln #3 Inlet 

Span: 1000 

Ana(yzer Caiibration 

Cylinder Analyzer Absolute 

Value Response Difference 

(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 

0 0 0.00 

525.5 535.5 10.00 

899.5 900.1 0.60 

Svstem Calibration 

Analyzer System Absolute 

Response Response Difference 

(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 

0 -0.2 0.20 

535.5 518.1 17.40 

na na 0.00 

Samole $j/stem Bias #1 Initial 

Analyzer System System 

Response Calibration Bias 

(ppm) (°% of span) 

0 -0.2 -0.02 

535.5 518.1 -1.74 

Sample Svstem Bias #2 Initiai 

: Analyzer System System 

Response Calibration Bias 

(ppm) (% of span) 

0 0.2 0.02 

535.5 525.1 -1.04 

Samole Svstem Bias #3 Initial 

Analyzer System System 

Response Calibration Bias 

(ppm) (% of span) 

0 0.4 0.04 

535.5 523.2 -1.23 

Date: 10/31-95 

Sample Gas: NOx 

Difference 

(°i6 of span) 

0.00 

1.00 

0.06 

Difference 

(°% of span) 

0.02 

1.74 

0.00 

Final 

System System Drift 

Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(% ofspan) 

0.2 0.02 0.04 

525.1 -1.04 0.70 

Final 

System System Drift 

Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(% of span) 

0.4 0.04 0.02 

523.2 -1.23 0.19 

Final 

System System Drift 

Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(% of span) 

0.5 0.05 0.01 

520.7 -1.48 0.25 

A9-:? 
Company: Interstate Bricic Date: 10/31-95 

Source: Kiln #3 Inlet Sample Gas: CO 

Span: 1000 

Analyzer Caiibration 

Cylinder Anaiyzer Absolute Difference 

Value Response Difference (% of span) 

(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 

0 0 0.00 0.00 

324.0 326.1 2.10 0.21 

646.8 647.3 0.50 0.05 

Svstem Calibration 

Analyzer System Absolute Difference 

Response Response Difference (% of span) 

" (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 

0 1 1.00 0.10 

326.1 325.8 0.30 0.03 

na na 0.00 0.00 

Samgle Svstem Bias #1 Initial Final 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (°% of span) 

0 1 0.10 0.3 0.03 0.07 

326.1 325.8 -0.03 328.8 0.27 0.30 

SamQle Svstem Bias #2 Initial Final . 

Ana(yzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 

0 0.3 0.03 0.7 0.07 0.04 

326.1 328.8 0.27 324.1 -0.20 0.47 

$a nRle Svstem Bias #3 Initial Final 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 

0 0.7 0.07 0.3 0.03 0.04 

326.1 324.1 -0.20 311.8 -1.43 1.23 

,~ a- 0 
Company: Interstate Bricfc Date: 10/31-95 

Source: Kiln #3 Inlet Sample Gas: S02 

Span: 1000 

Analyzer Calibration 

Cylinder Analyzer Absolute Difference 

Value Response Difference (% of span) 

(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 

0 -1 1.00 0.10 

514.6 516.6 2.00 0.20 

901.6 901.3 0.30 0.03 

Svstem Calibration 

Analyzer System Absolute Difference 

Response Response Difference (% of span) 

(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 

-1 -0.6 0.40 0.04 

516.6 518.1 1.50 0.15 

na na 0.00 0.00 

_ ample Svstem Bias #1 Initial Final 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (°% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 

-1 -0.6 0.04 0 0.10 0.06 

516.6 518.1 0.15 507.1 -0.95 1.10 

Sample Svstem Bias #2 Initial Final 

Anaiyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Caiibration Bias (°% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (°10 of span) 

-1 0 0.10 1.3 0.23 0.13 

516.6 507.1 -0.95 505.5 -1.11 0.16 

- ample Svstem Bias #3 Initial Finai 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (°rb of span) 

-1 1.3 0.23 1.6 0.26 0.03 

516.6 505.5 -1.11 507.3 -0.93 0.18 

1- 
Company: Interstate Bricfc Date: 10/31-95 

Source: Kiln #3 Outlet Sample Gas: S02 

Span: 100 

Analtizer Catibration 

Cyiinder Anaiyzer Absolute Difference 

Value Response Difference (% of span) 

(ppm) (ppm) (pp n) 

0 -0.1 0.10 0.10 

54.5 55.1 0.60 0.60 

88.4 88.6 0.20 0.20 

System Calibration 

Analyzer System Absolute DifPerence 

Response Response Difference (% of span) 

(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 

-0.1 0.2 0.30 0.30 

na na 0.00 0.00 

88.6 88.8 0.20 0.20 

Samole $_ystem Bias #1 Initial Finaf 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (°% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (°,% of span) 

-0.1 0.2 0.30 0.3 0.40 0.10 

88.6 88.8 0.20 88.8 0.20 0.00 

SamQle Svstem Bias #2 Initiai Final 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Caiibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 

-0.1 0.3 0.40 0.2 0.30 0.10 

88.6 88.8 0.20 88.3 -0.30 0.50 

Samgle Svstem Bias #3 Initial Finaf 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (°r6 of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 

-0.1 0.2 0.30 0 0.10 0.20 

88.6 88.3 -0.30 88.7 0.10 0.40 

~~~ 
Company: Interstate Brick Date: 10/31-95 

Source: Kiln #3 Outlet Sample Gas: CO 

Span: 1000 

Analvzer Calibration _ 

Cylinder Analyzer Absolute Difference 

Value Response Difference (% of span) 

(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 

0 -0.1 0.10 0.01 

32.4 32.1 0.30 0.03 

62.7 61.8 0.90 0.09 

Svstem Calibration 

Analyzer System Absolute Difference 

Response Response Difference (% of span) 

(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 

-0.1 0.9 1.00 0.10 

na na 0.00 0.00 

61.8 61.7 0.10 0.01 

_Samole Svstem Bias #1 Initial Final 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 

-0.1 0.9 0.10 0 0.01 0.09 

646.8 646.8 0.00 651.7 0.49 0.49 

Samole Svstem Bias #2 Initial Final 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 

-0,1 0 0.01 0 0.01 0.00 

646.8 651.7 0.49 647.3 0.05 0.44 

Sample Svstem Bias #3 Initial Final 

Analyzer System System System System Drift 

Response Calibration Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(ppm) (% of span) (% of span) 

-0.1 0 0.01 0 0.01 0.00 

- 646.8 647.3 0.05 647.7 0.09 0.04 

~~,1 
l Company: Interstate Bricic 

Source: Kiln #3 Outlet 

Span: 100 

AnalYzer Calibratio 

Cylinder Analyzer 

Value Response 

(ppm) (ppm) 

0 -0.2 

53.4 53.2 

87.3 87.2 

Date: 10/31-95 

Sample Gas: NOx 

Absoiute Difference 

Difference (% of span) 

(ppm) 

0.20 0.20 

0.20 0.20 

0.10 0.10 

System Calibration 

Analyzer System 

- Response Response 

(ppm) (ppm) 

-0.2 0.4 

na na 

87.2 87.6 

5amole Svstem Bias #1 

Analyzer System 

Response Calibration 

(ppm) 

-0.2 0.4 

87.2 87.6 

Sample Svstem Bias #2 

Analyzer System 

Response Calibration 

(ppm) 

-0.2 0.1 

87.2 87.7 

Sample System Bias #3 

Analyzer System 

Response Calibration 

(ppm) 

-0.2 0.6 

87.2 87.7 

Absolute Difference 

Difference (°% of span) 

(ppm) 

0.60 0.60 

0.00 0.00 

0.40 0.40 

Initial Finai 

System System System Drift 

Bias Calibration Bias (°% of span) 

(% of span) (% of span) 

0.60 0.1 0.30 0.30 

0.40 87.7 0.50 0.10 

Initial Final 

System System System Drift 

Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(% of span) (% of span) 

0.30 0.6 0.80 0.50 

0.50 87.7 0.50 0.00 

Initial Final 

System System System Drift 

Bias Calibration Bias (% of span) 

(% of span) (% of span) 

0.80 0 0.20 0.60 

0.50 87.6 0.40 0.10 

~3 z