alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NT Holding Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
      the
      period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof, I, Alan Lew, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                November 14, 2007
              
              
              /s/
                Alan Lew
              
              Alan
                Lew
              Chief
                Financial Officer
# L_2008281EN.01S00301.xml

| 24.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 281/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 281/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3734

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at Fifth

as the ‘‘Joe Skeen Federal Building’’.and Richardson Avenues in Roswell, New Mexico,

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3734

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at Fifth and Richardson Avenues in Roswell, New Mexico, as the ‘‘Joe

Skeen Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3734 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at Fifth and Richardson

3 Avenues in Roswell, New Mexico, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Joe Skeen Federal Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

9 a reference to the ‘‘Joe Skeen Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 22,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM YEAR END
1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFEENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          18,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,738
<PP&E>                                          42,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,769
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,404
<SALES>                                         80,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,860
<CGS>                                           69,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,201
<INCOME-TAX>                                       978
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,223
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32


</TABLE>
§ 135.211 VFR: Over-the-top carrying passengers: Operating limitations. Subject to any additional limitations in § 135.181, no person may operate an aircraft under VFR over-the-top carrying passengers, unless— ( a ) Weather reports or forecasts, or any combination of them, indicate that the weather at the intended point of termination of over-the-top flight— ( 1 ) Allows descent to beneath the ceiling under VFR and is forecast to remain so until at least 1 hour after the estimated time of arrival at that point; or
( 2 ) Allows an IFR approach and landing with flight clear of the clouds until reaching the prescribed initial approach altitude over the final approach facility, unless the approach is made with the use of radar under § 91.175(i) of this chapter; or
( b ) It is operated under conditions allowing— ( 1 ) For multiengine aircraft, descent or continuation of the flight under VFR if its critical engine fails; or
( 2 ) For single-engine aircraft, descent under VFR if its engine fails.
[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-32, 54 FR 34332, Aug. 18, 1989; 73 FR 20164, Apr. 15, 2008]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 131647 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131647 COA: 269436 Wayne CC: 00-011620-01 TERRANCE L. RAINES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 25, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

d1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
| | Samson Bélair/Deloitte &
          Touche s.e.n.c.r.l.
          1, Place Ville Marie
          Suite 3000
          Montréal QC H3B 4T9
          Canada
          Tel: (514) 393-7115
          Fax: (514) 390-4113
          www.deloitte.ca
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|EXHIBIT 23.1
|------------

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in CGI Group Inc.s Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Reg. Nos. 333-112021, 333-13350, 333-66044 and 333-74932) of our report dated November 10, 2003,
which is included in this Annual Report on Form 40-F.

/s/ Samson Bélair/Deloitte & Touche s.e.n.c.r.l.
Chartered Accountants
Montreal Quebec
February 16, 2004
§ 171.29 Installation requirements. ( a ) The facility must be installed according to accepted good engineering practices, applicable electric and safety codes, and FCC licensing requirements.
( b ) The facility must have a reliable source of suitable primary power.
( c ) Dual transmitting equipment may be required to support some IFR procedures.
( d ) A facility intended for use as an instrument approach aid for an airport must have or be supplemented by (depending on the circumstances) the following ground-air or landline communications services: ( 1 ) At facilities outside of and not immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, there must be ground-air communications from the airport served by the facility. Voice on the aid controlled from the airport is acceptable.
( 2 ) At facilities within or immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, there must be the ground-air communications required by paragraph (d)(1) of this section and reliable communications (at least a landline telephone) from the airport to the nearest FAA air traffic control or communication facility.
Paragraphs (d) (1) and (2) of this section are not mandatory at airports where an adjacent FAA facility can communicate with aircraft on the ground at the airport and during the entire proposed instrument approach procedure. In addition, at low traffic density airports within or immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, and where extensive delays are not a factor, the requirements of paragraphs (d) (1) and (2) of this section may be reduced to reliable communications (at least a landline telephone) from the airport to the nearest FAA air traffic control or communications facility, if an adjacent FAA facility can communicate with aircraft during the proposed instrument approach procedure, at least down to the minimum en route altitude for the controlled airspace area. [Doc. No. 5034, 29 FR 11337, Aug. 6, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 171-16, 56 FR 65664, Dec. 17, 1991]
§ 17.13 Dispute resolution process for protests. ( a ) Protests concerning FAA SIRs, solicitations, or contract awards shall be resolved pursuant to this part.
( b ) Potential protestors should, where possible, attempt to resolve any issues concerning potential protests with the CO. Such attempts are not a prerequisite to filing a protest with the ODRA.
( c ) Offerors or prospective offerors shall file a protest with the ODRA in accordance with § 17.15. The protest time limitations set forth in § 17.15 will not be extended by attempts to resolve a potential protest with the CO. Other than the time limitations specified in § 17.15 for the filing of protests, the ODRA retains the discretion to modify any timeframes established herein in connection with protests.
( d ) In accordance with § 17.17(b), the ODRA shall convene an initial status conference for the purpose of scheduling proceedings in the protest and to encourage the parties to consider using the ODRA's ADR process to attempt to resolve the protest, pursuant to subpart D of this part. It is the Agency's policy to use voluntary ADR to the maximum extent practicable. If the parties elect not to attempt ADR, or if ADR efforts do not completely resolve the protest, the protest will proceed under the ODRA Adjudicative Process set forth in subpart E of this part. Informal ADR techniques may be utilized simultaneously with ongoing adjudication.
( e ) The ODRA Director shall designate DROs, outside neutrals or Special Masters as potential neutrals for the resolution of protests through ADR. The ultimate choice of an ADR neutral is made by the parties participating in the ADR. The ODRA Director also shall, at his or her sole discretion, designate an adjudicating DRO or Special Master for each matter. A person serving as a neutral in an ADR effort in a matter, shall not serve as an adjudicating DRO or Special Master for that matter.
( f ) Multiple protests concerning the same SIR, solicitation, or contract award may be consolidated at the discretion of the ODRA Director, and assigned to a single DRO or Special Master for adjudication.
( g ) Procurement activities, and, where applicable, contractor performance pending resolution of a protest, shall continue during the pendency of a protest, unless there is a compelling reason to suspend all or part of the procurement activities or contractor performance. Pursuant to §§ 17.15(d) and 17.17(a), the ODRA may impose a temporary suspension and recommend suspension of award or contract performance, in whole or in part, for a compelling reason. A decision to suspend procurement activities or contractor performance is made in writing by the Administrator or the Administrator's delegee upon recommendation of the ODRA.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.621 Issue of letters of TSO design approval: Import articles. ( a ) The FAA may issue a letter of TSO design approval for an article— ( 1 ) Designed and manufactured in a foreign country or jurisdiction subject to the export provisions of an agreement with the United States for the acceptance of these articles for import; and
( 2 ) For import into the United States if— ( i ) The State of Design certifies that the article has been examined, tested, and found to meet the applicable TSO or the applicable performance standards of the State of Design and any other performance standards the FAA may prescribe to provide a level of safety equivalent to that provided by the TSO; and
( ii ) The manufacturer has provided to the FAA one copy of the technical data required in the applicable performance standard through its State of Design.
( b ) The FAA issues the letter of TSO design approval that lists any deviation granted under § 21.618.
[Doc. No. FAA-2006-25877, Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53392, Oct. 16, 2009, as amended by Amdt. 21-92A, 75 FR 9095, Mar. 1, 2010]
From: Adams, Lucy H. To: Marinshaw, Richard Subject: Utah Chrome plating Date: Thursday, March 03, 2011 4:07:10 PM

Got a call back from Utah.

Five of the facilities listed in the high risk plants spreadsheets are decorative chrome facilities. Utah only requires a check of surface tension for those.

The five decorative chrome facilities are: Salt Lake Chrome T&T Ogden Crown Plating Swain Plating

He will see if there are any test reports for the hard chrome facilities. He mentioned two hard chrome plants that may not be in business: Quality Plating and Advantage Plating.

Lucy
#### § 1204.1400 Scope.

This subpart establishes the responsibility and sets forth the conditions and procedures for the use of NASA airfield facilities by aircraft not operated for the benefit of the Federal Government.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10885]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-388]


PP&L, Inc.; Notice of Correction to Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License, Proposed No 
Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a 
Hearing

    On April 21, 2000 (65 FR 21487), the Federal Register published a 
notice of issuance of amendment to facility operating license, proposed 
no significant hazards consideration determination, and opportunity for 
a hearing for PP&L, Inc.. On page 21488, third column, second 
paragraph, the date May 5, 2000 was incorrectly noted. It should read 
``May 22, 2000.''

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of April 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michael T. Lesar,
Rules Review and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative 
Services, Office of Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-10885 Filed 5-1 -00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

***Final Site*** September 2015



### BJAT LLC Franklin, Massachusetts

Norfolk County

 **Site Location:** 

BJAT LLC is an approximately 18.3- acre property located at 300 Fisher Street in Franklin, Norfolk County, Massachusetts.

 **Site History:** 

Beginning in the late 1800s the BJAT LLC property was used for industrial operations including the manufacture of rubber

and plastic products. The property has not been active since 1985.

The current owner of the site has conducted four environmental investigations from 2005 to 2012. These include an

Environmental Site Assessment in 2005; a Subsurface Investigation in 2007; a Site Inspection in 2008 and a

Comprehensive Site Assessment in 2012. Previous investigations have found process waste and debris containing

hazardous substances including metals and semi

- volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) at concentrations above applicable

state standards.

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:** 

Lead, mercury and zinc, as well as a number of SVOCs are contaminating the soil, sediment and ground water. Over the

years manufacturing activity has left areas of process waste and debris on the property.

 **Potential Impacts**  **on Surrounding**  **Community/Environment:**

A town of Franklin public water supply well is located less than 1⁄2 mile from the property. There is also a town beach

within one mile. Contamination has migrated to surrounding wetlands and surface water sediments.

 **Response Activities**  **(to date):** 

The entire site has been fenced to discourage trespassers. Additional fencing has been constructed in areas identified as

posing an elevated hazard due to high levels of metals and SVOCs in soils and sediments.

 **Need for**  **NPL Listing:** 

The commonwealth of Massachusetts referred the site to the EPA because the contaminated ground water plume is

affecting nearby properties and wetlands, and contamination on the property poses a hazard to people that may come in

contact with soil and debris. Other cleanup approaches were considered, but are not viable at this time because of the extent

of contamination. The EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737.
Exhibit 10(a)  


[SUTHERLAND
ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP LETTERHEAD] 


April 22,
2003 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 280 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 



Directors: 


        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 3
to the registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-63328) filed by Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 



	 	 	Sincerely,
	

 	
 	

SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ David S. Goldstein
 David S. Goldstein
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
				Washington, D.C. 20549

				          FORM 10-Q

		         QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
			    THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the Quarter Ended:	 02/28/94		Commission File Number: 0-14834


			        CORNWALL TIN & MINING CORPORATION
		__________________________________________________________________
				(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

					DELAWARE
		__________________________________________________________________
				(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

					   13-2627473
		__________________________________________________________________
					 (IRS Employer  Identification No.)

		20 Queen St W, Suite 600. Toronto, Ont. Canada	                 M5H 3R3
		_______________________________________	              _____________
		(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)

               					         (416) 971-8611
		_________________________________________________________________
			(Registrant's telephone number, including area code):

		_________________________________________________________________
			(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
				if changed since last report)




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of
 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
 subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


Yes__________					No___X____

















APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed all documents
and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of
securities under a plan confirmed by a court.


Yes__________			No__________		Not Applicable____X____


APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

Issued and outstanding:			2,710,800




					PART 1

			FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item  1.		Financial Statements

			   N/A

Item  2.		Management's Discussion and Analysis of
		Financial Condition and Results of
		Operations

			   Inactive





				PART 11     OTHER INFORMATION

Item  1.		Legal Proceedings

			   None


Item  2.		Change in Securities

			   None


Item  3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities

			   None


Item  4.		Submission of Matters to a vote of Security Holders

			   None


Item  5.		Other Information

		None

Item  6.		Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 			   None
















				SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


CORNWALL TIN & MINING CORPORATION


        	Augest 4th, 2003					"James T Riley"
Date:_________________				_______________________________________
							James T. Riley
							President