alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3839 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 496
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3839

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ``Opha May 
                         Johnson Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2020

 Mr. Young (for himself and Mr. Braun) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             July 23, 2020

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ``Opha May 
                         Johnson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPHA MAY JOHNSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Opha May Johnson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Opha May 
Johnson Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 496

116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3839

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ``Opha May 
                         Johnson Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 23, 2020

                       Reported without amendment
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00468-CV

Michael Miller d/b/a All Economy 

Foreign & Dismantling; and ABC 

Late Model Truck & Auto Parts, Inc.

v.

Recovery Systems, Inc. d/b/a Pro 

Tow Wrecker Service; H&W Risk 

Management Inc.; and Robert West

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 2

of Denton County (GC-2005-00122)

September 19, 2013

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant Michael Miller d/b/a All Economy 

Foreign & Dismantling; and ABC Late Model Truck & Auto Parts, Inc. shall jointly 

and severally pay all the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _________________________________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
#### Charles A. Secor, Respondent, *v.*Wilbur K. Mathews et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment, entered upon a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion far a new trial.

Henry M. Earle, for appellants.

Marsh *&*Wever, for respondent.

*810
      *Per Curiam.*

We have carefully examined the record herein and find that the only question in the case was one of fact fairly submitted to the jury and their verdict has the support of a fair preponderance of the evidence.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: McCarthy and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7215

JOHNNIE PETTAWAY, Petitioner – Appellant,

v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; GOVERNOR; ATTORNEY GENERAL; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, Respondents – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00481-JCC-IDD)

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 27, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie Pettaway, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Johnnie Pettaway seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pettaway has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal L 206/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 206 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6114 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 206

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6114 August 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1127 of 28 May 2018 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2195 on supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Social Fund, regarding the definition of standard scales of unit costs and lump sums for reimbursement of expenditure by the Commission to Member States | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1127 of 28 May 2018 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2195 on supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Social Fund, regarding the definition of standard scales of unit costs and lump sums for reimbursement of expenditure by the Commission to Member States

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 1271.600 Semi-annual compilation. ( a ) The head of each agency shall collect and compile the disclosure reports (see appendix B) and, on May 31 and November 30 of each year, submit to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives a report containing a compilation of the information contained in the disclosure reports received during the six-month period ending on March 31 or September 30, respectively, of that year.
( b ) The report, including the compilation, shall be available for public inspection 30 days after receipt of the report by the Secretary and the Clerk.
( c ) Information that involves intelligence matters shall be reported only to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( d ) Information that is classified under Executive Order 12356 or any successor order shall be reported only to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives (whichever such committees have jurisdiction of matters involving such information) and to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( e ) The first semi-annual compilation shall be submitted on May 31, 1990, and shall contain a compilation of the disclosure reports received from December 23, 1989 to March 31, 1990.
( f ) Major agencies, designated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), are required to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives no later than with the compilations due on May 31, 1991. OMB shall provide detailed specifications in a memorandum to these agencies.
( g ) Non-major agencies are requested to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives.
( h ) Agencies shall keep the originals of all disclosure reports in the official files of the agency.
Exhibit 99.1


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the
undersigned  certifies  that  this  periodic  report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as
amended, and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
Ridgewood Electric Power Trust V.

Date:  June 24, 2003         /s/ Robert E. Swanson
                             --------------------------------
                             Robert E. Swanson
                             Chief Executive Officer

Date:  June 24, 2003         /s/ Christopher I. Naunton
                             --------------------------------
                             Christopher I. Naunton
                             Chief Financial Officer

     This certification accompanies this periodic report pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of NT Holding Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Alan Lew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 18, 2008/s/ Alan Lew
Alan Lew
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP97-369-000 and RP98-39-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

April 24, 2000.
    On March 13 and 28, 2000, the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) 
sponsored two informal settlement conferences for the purpose of 
initiating settlement discussions potentially leading to a resolution 
of all the Kansas ad valorem proceedings. During the March 28 
conference, the participants agreed that settlement negotiations among 
all interested parties should be pursued separately for each pipeline 
involved with the Kansas ad valorem tax refund issues.
    The participants interested in the Northern Natural Gas Company 
docket also reached a consensus that the informal settlement conference 
agreed upon should be noticed by the Secretary of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) and that the Commission's settlement 
regulations apply to the informal settlement process. The participants 
also agreed that, as with the previous two settlement conferences, the 
Director of the Commission's Dispute Resolution Service and the KCC 
attend the conference and facilitate the settlement negotiations.
    The informal settlement conference will be held on May 9, 2000, at 
the Wyndham Garden Hotel located at 7000 West 108th, Overland Park, 
Kansas. The conference will begin at 9:00 a.m. To insure that the 
facilities are adequately sized all parties that plan to attend the 
settlement conference are requested to contact Sharon Solon by phone at 
(402) 398-7015 or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fa89929b889594d48995969594ba9f94889594d4999597"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85f6ede4f7eaebabf6eae9eaebc5e0ebf7eaebabe6eae8">[email protected]</span></a> or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#355854474c1b5e544c1b585c5959504775505b475a5b1b565a58"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c010d1e1542070d154201050000091e2c09021e0302420f0301">[email protected]</span></a> no later than May 3, 2000.
    All interested parties in the above dockets are requested to attend 
the informal settlement conference. If a party has any questions 
respecting the conference, please call Richard Miles, the Director of 
the Dispute Resolution Service. His telephone number is 1 877 FERC ADR 
(337-2237) or 202-208-0702 and his e-mail address is 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9deff4fef5fceff9b3f0f4f1f8eeddfbf8effeb3fbf8f9b3e8ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e3c272d262f3c2a602327222b3d0e282b3c2d60282b2a603b3d">[email protected]</span></a>.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10561 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 2, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 25453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10759]



[[Page 25453]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA No. 00-835; MM Docket No. 99-302; RM-9727]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Monahans and Gardendale, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document reallots Channel 271C from Monahans, Texas, to 
Gardendale, Texas, and modifies the license for Station KFZX (formerly 
KCDQ) to specify operation on Channel 271C at Gardendale in response to 
a petition filed by Capstar Royalty II Corporation See 64 FR 57835, 
October 27, 1999. The coordinates for Channel 271C at Gardendale are 
31-57-55 and 102-46-10. With this action, this proceeding is 
terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 30, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 99-302, adopted April 5, 2000, and released 
April 14, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the 
Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 857-3800, 
facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Texas, is 
amended by removing Channel 271C at Monahans and adding Gardendale, 
Channel 271C.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-10759 Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: YO USIF H. HALLOUM,

Debtor.

------------------------------

YOUSIF H. HALLOUM,

Appellant,

v.

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,

WAYTE & CARRUTH; HILTON A.

RYDER, U.S. Trustee,

Appellees. No. 16

- 60059

BAP No. 15

- 1291

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Dunn, Taylor, and Jury , Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017 **

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Halloum’s request for oral

argument, set forth in his reply brief, is denied. 

# FILED

APR 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 60059

Yousif Halloum appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s

(“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order allowing fees and

expenses to Halloum ’s former counsel, and the BAP’s order denying rehearing.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158. We independently review the

bankruptcy court’s decision, see Law Offices of David A. Boone v. Derham

- Burk

(In re Eliapo) , 468 F.3d 592, 596 (9th Cir. 2 006), and we affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in awarding fees to

Halloum’s former counsel on the basis of the parties’ retainer agreement, because

counsel testified that Halloum had signed the agreement and that the parties did no t

enter into a flat fee arrangement. See Stahl v. Simon (In re Adamson Apparel,

Inc.) , 785 F.3d 1285, 1291 (9th Cir. 2015) (“Clear error exists when, although

there is evidence to support the lower court’s conclusion, the reviewing court is left

with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (citation and

internal quotation marks omitted)).

We reject as without merit Halloum’s arguments that the BAP and the

bankruptcy court violated his due process rights.

Halloum’s motion to file an oversize reply brief (Docket No. 18) is granted.

AFFIRMED.
§ 13.63 Record, decision, and aircraft registration proceedings. ( a ) *The record.* ( 1 ) The testimony and exhibits admitted at a hearing, together with all papers, requests, and rulings filed in the proceedings, are the exclusive basis for the issuance of the hearing officer's decision.
( 2 ) On appeal to the Administrator, the record shall include all of the information identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and evidence proffered but not admitted at the hearing.
( 3 ) Any party may obtain a transcript of the hearing from the official reporter upon payment of the required fees.
( b ) *Hearing officer's decision.* The decision by the hearing officer must include findings of fact based on the record, conclusions of law, and an appropriate order.
( c ) *Certain aircraft registration proceedings.* If the hearing officer determines that an aircraft is ineligible for a certificate of aircraft registration in proceedings relating to aircraft registration orders suspending or revoking a certificate of registration under § 13.20, the hearing officer may suspend or revoke the aircraft registration certificate.
§ 703.104 Requirements for Counterparty agreements, collateral and Margining. To enter into Derivative transactions under this subpart, a Federal credit union must: ( a ) Have an executed Master Services Agreement with a Counterparty. Such agreement must be reviewed by counsel with expertise in similar types of transactions to ensure the agreement reasonably protects the interests of the Federal credit union;
( b ) Use only the following Counterparties: ( 1 ) For exchange-traded and cleared Derivatives: Swap Dealers, Introducing Brokers, and/or FCMs that are current registrants of the CFTC; or
( 2 ) For Non-cleared Derivative transactions: Swap Dealers that are current registrants of the CFTC.
( c ) Utilize contracted Margin requirements with a maximum Margin threshold amount of $250,000; and
( d ) For Non-cleared Derivative transactions, accept as eligible collateral, for Margin requirements, only the following: Cash (U.S. dollars), U.S. Treasuries, government-sponsored enterprise debt, U.S. government agency debt, government-sponsored enterprise residential mortgage-backed security pass-through securities, and U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed security pass-through securities.
§ 16.219 Subpoenas. ( a ) *Request for subpoena.* A party may apply to the hearing officer, within the time specified for such applications in the prehearing conference report, for a subpoena to compel testimony at a hearing or to require the production of documents only from the following persons: ( 1 ) Another party;
( 2 ) An officer, employee, or agent of another party;
( 3 ) Any other person named in the complaint as participating in or benefiting from the actions of the respondent alleged to have violated any Act;
( 4 ) An officer, employee, or agent of any other person named in the complaint as participating in or benefiting from the actions of the respondent alleged to have violated any Act.
( b ) *Issuance and service of subpoena.* ( 1 ) The hearing officer issues the subpoena if the hearing officer determines that the evidence to be obtained by the subpoena is relevant and material to the resolution of the issues in the case.
( 2 ) Subpoenas shall be served by personal service, or upon an agent designated in writing for the purpose, or by certified mail, return receipt addressed to such person or agent. Whenever service is made by registered or certified mail, the date of mailing shall be considered as the time when service is made.
( 3 ) A subpoena issued under this part is effective throughout the United States or any territory or possession thereof.
( c ) *Motions to quash or modify subpoena.* ( 1 ) A party or any person upon whom a subpoena has been served may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena with the hearing officer at or before the time specified in the subpoena for the filing of such motions. The applicant shall describe in detail the basis for the application to quash or modify the subpoena including, but not limited to, a statement that the testimony, document, or tangible evidence is not relevant to the proceeding, that the subpoena is not reasonably tailored to the scope of the proceeding, or that the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive.
( 2 ) A motion to quash or modify the subpoena stays the effect of the subpoena pending a decision by the hearing officer on the motion.