alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1245.108 License to contractor. ( a ) Each contractor reporting an invention is granted a revocable, nonexclusive, royalty-free license in each patent application filed in any country on the invention and in any resulting patent in which the Government acquires title. The license extends to the contractor's domestic subsidiaries and affiliates, if any, within the corporate structure of which the contractor is a party and includes the right to grant sublicenses of the same scope to the extent the contractor was legally obligated to do so at the time the contract was awarded. The license and right is transferable only with the approval of the Administrator except when transferred to the successor of that part of the contractor's business to which the invention pertains.
( b ) The contractor's domestic license may be revoked or modified by the Administrator to the extent necessary to achieve expeditious practical application of the invention pursuant to an application for an exclusive license submitted in accordance with the Licensing of Government-Owned Inventions (37 CFR part 404). This license will not be revoked in that field of use and/or the geographical areas in which the contractor has achieved practical application and continues to make the benefits of the invention available to the public on reasonable terms. The license in any foreign country may be revoked or modified at the discretion of the Administrator to the extent the contractor, its licensees, or its domestic subsidiaries or affiliates have failed to achieve practical application in that foreign country.
( c ) Before revocation or modification of the license, the contractor will be provided a written notice of the Administrator's intention to revoke or modify the license, and the contractor will be allowed 30 days (or any other time as may be allowed by the Administrator for good cause shown by the contractor) after the notice to show cause why the license should not be revoked or modified. The contractor shall have the right to appeal, in accordance with applicable regulations in 37 CFR part 404, any decision concerning the revocation or modification of its license.
[52 FR 43748, Nov. 16, 1987, as amended at 80 FR 19199, Apr. 10, 2015]
§ 107.65 Aeronautical knowledge recency. A person may not exercise the privileges of a remote pilot in command with small UAS rating unless that person has accomplished one of the following in a manner acceptable to the Administrator within the previous 24 calendar months: ( a ) Passed an initial aeronautical knowledge test covering the areas of knowledge specified in § 107.73;
( b ) Completed recurrent training covering the areas of knowledge specified in § 107.73; or
( c ) If a person holds a pilot certificate (other than a student pilot certificate) issued under part 61 of this chapter and meets the flight review requirements specified in § 61.56, completed training covering the areas of knowledge specified in § 107.74.
( d ) A person who has passed a recurrent aeronautical knowledge test in a manner acceptable to the Administrator or who has satisfied the training requirement of paragraph (c) of this section prior to April 6, 2021 within the previous 24 calendar months is considered to be in compliance with the requirement of paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, as applicable.
[Amdt. No. 107-8, 86 FR 4382, Jan. 15, 2021; 86 FR 13631, Mar. 10, 2021]
#### § 135.603 Pilot-in-command instrument qualifications.

After April 24, 2017, no certificate holder may use, nor may any person serve as, a pilot in command of a helicopter air ambulance operation unless that person meets the requirements of § 135.243 and holds a helicopter instrument rating or an airline transport pilot certificate with a category and class rating for that aircraft, that is not limited to VFR.
##### 



Exhibit 12

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002

I, Nikolaos Varsakis, the chief executive officer of STET Hellas
Telecommunications S.A. certify that to the best of my knowledge (i) the Form
20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of STET Hellas Telecommunications S.A.

/s/ NIKOLAOS VARSAKIS
Name: Nikolaos Varsakis
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 30, 2003



---



##### 



Exhibit 12

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002

I, Ruggero Caterini, the chief financial officer of STET Hellas
Telecommunications S.A., certify that to the best of my knowledge (i) the Form
20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of STET Hellas Telecommunications S.A..

/s/ RUGGERO CATERINI

Name: Ruggero Caterini

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 30, 2003

-2-
###### Editorial Note on Part 183

#### Editorial Note:

For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

#### § 183.17 Reports.

Each representative designated under this part shall make such reports as are prescribed by the Administrator.
cc: Hon. Bill Henderson, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Peter Berney 

Hai Yan Liao 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A
#### BAYLESS’ LESSEE *v.*RUPERT.

Ejectment — act of congress — errors—section lines — quantity.

The act of congress of 1805, makes the lines and comers of the government surveys, as now established and recorded, the true line of the survey, and the quantity of land the tiue quantity whether accurate or not.

*635The courts cannot change this law nor correct errors in the survey, by which they deviate from the directions of the law under which the public lands were surveyed.

Ejectment. The plaintiff claimed under a patent for section 20, t. 2, r. 13, dated January, 1813. The defendant claims under a patent for section 26, in the same township. It appeared in evidence that there were two marked lines several rods apart between these sections, one called the *west*and the other the *east*line.

*Good*and Schenck,,for the plaintiff.

*Young*and *M. Corwin,*for the defendant.

Wright, J.

to the jury. The real question in dispute is, where is the line between sections 20 and 26? The act of congress, of February, 1805, (29 O. *L.*38) provides that the lines run, and corners marked and returned to the surveyor general’s office shall be the true lines and corners, and the quantity of land so returned *shall he esteemed the true quantity.*Good .policy required the passage of this law. The laws required the lines of the government surveys to be run to the cardinal points of the 'compass. But was this always done? Were the instruments used always accurate? Neither. Lines were, however, in fact run, and returned, and recorded. To these all had access — by these sales were made — and by these this law requires all to be bound. The real question is, then, where was the line which is returned as the boundary between these two sections run on the ground? Not where it should have been run. If the line run and returned is ever so erroneous, it. must govern, because the law so provides: we have no power to correct it. .. The parties bought of the government to this line and so they must hold. You have a copy of the record and field notes, and have heard the evidence. If the west line as claimed is the line returned and described in the record, the plaintiff is entitled to your verdict, i'f not the defendant should have it.

Verdict for the plaintiff.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 7
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                               929,717
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                    0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                      0
<EQUITIES>                                          33,349
<MORTGAGE>                                               0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                            0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                   1,064,781
<CASH>                                               3,973
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   5,066
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                              40,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,617,141
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                    612,971
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                370,957
<POLICY-OTHER>                                           0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                    0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                     62,000
<COMMON>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  295
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         294,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,617,141
<PREMIUMS>                                         153,824
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                 24,718
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   1,215
<OTHER-INCOME>                                           0
<BENEFITS>                                          81,709
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         35,911
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                18,425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     37,850
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10,527
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 27,323
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        27,323
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.84
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                     373,606
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                112,708
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                        0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   4,038
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    79,086
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                    392,462
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             10,728
        



</TABLE>
§ 193.13 What is the no-notice procedure? This section states the no-notice procedure for the FAA to designate information as protected under this part. This procedure is used when there is an immediate safety or security need for the information. This procedure generally is used for specific information that you will provide on a short-term basis. ( a ) *Application.* You may request that the FAA designate information you are offering as protected under this part. You must state your name, at least the general nature of information, and whether you will provide the information without the protection of this part. Your request may be verbal or writing.
( b ) *Designation.* The FAA issues a written order designating information provided under this section as protected under this part. The FAA designates the information as protected under this part if the FAA— ( 1 ) Makes the findings as § 193.7; and
( 2 ) Finds that there is an immediate safety or security need to obtain the information without carrying out the procedures in § 193.11 of this part.
( c ) *Time limit.* Except as provided in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section, no designation under this section continues in effect for more than 60 days after the date of designation. Information provided during the time the designation was in effect remains protected under this part. Information provided that the designation ceases to be in effect is not protected under this part. The designation remains in effect for more than 60 days if— ( 1 ) The procedures to designate such information under § 193.11(a) have been initiated, or
( 2 ) There is an ongoing enforcement or criminal investigation, in which case the designation may continue until the investigation is completed.
( d ) *Amendment of designation.* The FAA may amend a designation under this section using the procedures in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( e ) *Withdrawal of designation.* The FAA may withdraw a designation under this section at any time the FAA finds that continuation does not meet the elements of § 193.7, or if the requirements of the designation are not met. The FAA withdraws the designation by notifying the person in writing that the designation is withdrawn. The withdrawal is effective on the date of receipt of the notice or such later date as the notice may state. Information provided during the time the designation was in effect remains protected under this part. Information provided after the withdrawal is effective is not protected under this part.
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

Data &
Consulting Services Division of Schlumberger Technology Corporation consents to: (i) the references to our firm in the form and context in which they appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quicksilver Resources Inc. (the Company)
for the year ended 31 December 2011 (the Annual Report); (ii) the use in the Annual Report of information contained in our reports setting forth the estimate of net revenue from the Companys proved oil and gas reserves as of 31
December 2011, 2010 and 2009 and our summary report filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Annual Report; and (iii) the incorporation by reference into the Companys Registration Statement No. 333-160046 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos.
333-91526, 333-161235, 333-116180, 333-134430 and 333-166208 on Form S-8 of all references to our firm including the information and summary report referenced in (ii) above.



DATA & CONSULTING SERVICES DIVISION OF SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ Charles M. BoyerCharles M. Boyer II, P.G., C.P.G., C.C.G. AdvisorUnconventional Reservoirs Pittsburgh GPE Manager


5 March 2012
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInvestigation to optimize the passive shock wave-boundary layer control for supercritical airfoil drag reductionThe optimization of passive shock wave/boundary layer control for supercritical airfoil drag reduction was investigated in a 3 in. x 15.4 in. Transonic Blowdown Wind Tunnel. A 14% thick supercritical airfoil was tested with 0%, 1.42% and 2.8% porosities at Mach numbers of .70 to .83. The 1.42% case incorporated a linear increase in porosity with the flow direction while the 2.8% case was uniform porosity. The static pressure distributions over the airfoil, the wake impact pressure data for determining the profile drag, and the Schlieren photographs for porous surface airfoils are presented and compared with the results for solid-surface airfoils. While the results show that linear 1.42% porosity actually led to a slight increase in drag it was found that the uniform 2.8% porosity can lead to a drag reduction of 46% at M = .81.Document ID19840008067Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsNagamatsu, H. T.*(Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst. Troy, NY, United States)*Ficarra, R.*(Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst. Troy, NY, United States)*Orozco, R.*(Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst. Troy, NY, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 8, 1983Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:173276NASA-CR-173276Accession Number84N16135Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-330Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840008067.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 2, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25453-25454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-832 ; MM Docket No. 99-340; RM-9778]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Seymour, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 222C2 to Seymour, Texas, in 
response to a petition filed by Seymour Radio Broadcasting Company. See 
64 FR 68662, December 8, 1999. The coordinates for Channel 222C2 at 
Seymour are 33-34-49 NL and 99-18-01 WL. There is a site restriction 4 
kilometers (2.5 miles) west of the community. With this action, this 
proceeding is terminated. A filing window for Channel 222C2 at Seymour 
will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue of opening a filing 
window for this channel will be addressed by the Commission in a 
subsequent order.

DATES: Effective May 30, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 99-340, adopted April 5, 2000, and released 
April 14, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the 
Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 857-3800, 
facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.


[[Page 25454]]


    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Texas, is 
amended by adding Channel 222C2 at Seymour.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-10757 Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6642

CASEY RAFAEL TYLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OLIVER WASHINGTON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:14-ct-03126-H)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 24, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Casey Rafael Tyler, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Casey Rafael Tyler appeals the district court’s order denying 

as moot his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Tyler v. Washington, No. 5:14-ct-03126-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 

21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit      32**

**Certification      by **

**pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 **

**as      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of      2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                for the periods reflected therein. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: December 15, 2005, |   | /s/ Daniel S.              Laikin                                                |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Daniel S. Laikin, Chief Executive              Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                     |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Date: December 15, 2005  |   | /s/ Douglas S.              Bennett                                                                                 |
|                     |   | Douglas S. Bennett, President and Chief              Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |

----