# Official Journal C 209/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.209.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 209 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5331 July 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.209.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 209

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5331 July 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2010/C 209/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 195, 17.7.2010 | 1 |
| | General Court |
| 2010/C 209/02 | Conduct of the activities of the General Court between 1 and 13 September 2010 | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2010/C 209/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 195, 17.7.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

1

General Court

2010/C 209/02

Conduct of the activities of the General Court between 1 and 13 September 2010

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2010/C 209/03 | Joined Cases C-570/07 and C-571/07: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Asturias, Spain) — José Manuel Blanco Pérez, María del Pilar Chao Gómez v Consejería de Salud y Servicios Sanitarios (C-570/07), Principado de Asturias (C-571/07) (Article 49 TFEU — Directive 2005/36/EC — Freedom of establishment — Public health — Pharmacies — Proximity — Provision of medicinal products to the public — Operating licence — Territorial distribution of pharmacies — Establishment of limits based on population density — Minimum distance between pharmacies — Candidates who have pursued professional activities on part of the national territory — Priority — Discrimination) | 3 |
| 2010/C 209/04 | Case C-58/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 June 2010 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queens’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom)) — The Queen on the application of Vodafone Ltd, Telefónica O2 Europe plc, T-Mobile International AG, Orange Personal Communications Services Ltd v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 — Roaming on public mobile telephone networks within the Community — Validity — Legal basis — Article 95 EC — Principles of proportionality and subsidiarity) | 4 |
| 2010/C 209/05 | Case C-203/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands)) — The Sporting Exchange Ltd, trading as Betfair v Minister van Justitie (Article 49 EC — Restrictions on the freedom to provide services — Games of chance — Offer of games of chance via the internet — Legislation reserving a licence to a single operator — Renewal of licence without subjecting the matter to competition — Principle of equal treatment and obligation of transparency — Application in the field of games of chance) | 4 |
| 2010/C 209/06 | Case C-258/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Ltd, Ladbrokes International Ltd v Stichting de Nationale Sporttotalisator (Article 49 EC — Restrictions on the freedom to provide services — Games of chance — Offer of games of chance via the internet — Legislation reserving a licence to a single operator — Refusal to grant an operating licence to an operator who is licensed in other Member States — Justification — Proportionality — Review of each specific measure applying national legislation) | 5 |
| 2010/C 209/07 | Case C-484/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain)) — Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid v Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc) (Directive 93/13/EEC — Consumer contracts — Terms defining the main subject-matter of the contract — Assessment by the courts as to their unfairness — Excluded — More stringent national provisions designed to afford a higher level of consumer protection) | 6 |
| 2010/C 209/08 | Case C-487/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 June 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Free movement of capital — Articles 56 EC and 40 of the EEA Agreement — Difference in treatment — Dividends distributed to resident and non-resident companies) | 6 |
| 2010/C 209/09 | Case C-491/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 June 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats — Wild fauna and flora — Sites of Community importance — Tourism complex ‘Is Arenas’) | 7 |
| 2010/C 209/10 | Case C-569/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht (Internet — eu Top Level Domain — Regulation (EC) No 874/2004 — Domain names — Phased registration — Special characters — Speculative and abusive registrations — Concept of ‘bad faith’) | 7 |
| 2010/C 209/11 | Case C-127/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Nürnberg (Germany)) — Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG (Trade-mark law — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 13(1) — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 7(1) — Exhaustion of the trade mark proprietor’s rights — Concept of ‘goods put on the market’ — Consent of the proprietor — Bottles of perfume known as ‘testers’, made available by the trade mark proprietor to an authorised specialist dealer belonging to a selective distribution network) | 8 |
| 2010/C 209/12 | Case C-140/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Genova (Italy)) — Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (State aid — Subsidies paid to a maritime transport undertaking discharging public service obligations — National Law providing for the possibility of making payments on account prior to the approval of an agreement) | 9 |
| 2010/C 209/13 | Case C-237/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium)) — Belgian State v Nathalie De Fruytier (Sixth VAT Directive — Article 13(A)(1)(d) — Exemptions for activities in the public interest — Supply of human organs, blood and milk — Activity of transporting, in a self-employed capacity, human organs and samples for hospitals and laboratories — Concepts of ‘supply of goods’ and ‘supply of services’ — Distinguishing criteria) | 10 |
| 2010/C 209/14 | Case C-378/09: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 June 2010 — European Commission v Czech Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 85/337/EEC — First, second and third paragraphs of Article 10a — National legislation restricting the right of action against decisions in the environmental field — Failure to transpose within the time-limit prescribed) | 10 |
| 2010/C 209/15 | Case C-26/10P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2010 by Paul Inge Hansen against the judgment delivered on 17 November 2009 in Case T-295/09 Paul Inge Hansen v Commission of the European Communities | 11 |
| 2010/C 209/16 | Case C-185/10: Action brought on 13 April 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland | 11 |
| 2010/C 209/17 | Case C-193/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht, Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 19 April 2010 — KMB Europe BV v Hauptzollamt Duisburg | 11 |
| 2010/C 209/18 | Case C-201/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 26 April 2010 — Ze Fu Fleischhandel GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas | 12 |
| 2010/C 209/19 | Case C-202/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 26 April 2010 — Vion Trading GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas | 12 |
| 2010/C 209/20 | Case C-212/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach (Republic of Poland), lodged on 3 May 2010 — Logstor ROR Polska Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Katowicach | 13 |
| 2010/C 209/21 | Case C-215/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 4 May 2010 — Pacific World Limited, FDD International Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs | 13 |
| 2010/C 209/22 | Case C-220/10: Action brought on 6 May 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic | 14 |
| 2010/C 209/23 | Case C-226/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 11 May 2010 — Hannelore Adams v Germanwings GmbH | 15 |
| 2010/C 209/24 | Case C-227/10: Action brought on 7 May 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia | 16 |
| 2010/C 209/25 | Case C-228/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 10 May 2010 — Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), British Sky Broadcasting Ltd v Euroview Sport Ltd | 16 |
| 2010/C 209/26 | Case C-230/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo no 3, de Almería (Spain) lodged on 11 May 2010 — Águeda María Sáenz Morales v Consejería para la Igualdad y Bienestar Social de la Junta de Andalucía | 21 |
| 2010/C 209/27 | Case C-232/10: Action brought on 10 May 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland | 21 |
| 2010/C 209/28 | Case C-235/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — David Claes v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation) | 22 |
| 2010/C 209/29 | Case C-236/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — Sophie Jeanjean v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation) | 22 |
| 2010/C 209/30 | Case C-237/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — Miguel Remy v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation) | 23 |
| 2010/C 209/31 | Case C-238/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — Volker Schneider v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation) | 23 |
| 2010/C 209/32 | Case C-239/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — Xuan-Mai Tran v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation) | 24 |
| 2010/C 209/33 | Case C-242/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Sezione Terza (Italy) lodged on 17 May 2010 — ENEL Produzione SpA v Autorità per l’Energia Elettrica e il Gas | 24 |
| 2010/C 209/34 | Case C-243/10: Action brought on 18 May 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic | 24 |
| 2010/C 209/35 | Case C-247/10 P: Appeal brought on 18 May 2010 by Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co., Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 4 March 2010 in Case T-407/06: Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co., Ltd v Council of the European Union | 25 |
| 2010/C 209/36 | Case C-248/10: Action brought on 19 May 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic | 26 |
| 2010/C 209/37 | Case C-249/10 P: Appeal brought on 18 May 2010 by Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 4 March 2010 in Case T-401/06: Brosmann Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union | 26 |
| 2010/C 209/38 | Case C-255/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Roma (Italy), made on 23 March 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Alessandro Sacchi | 27 |
| 2010/C 209/39 | Case C-259/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Civil Division) (England & Wales) made on 26 May 2010 — Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Rank Group PLC | 28 |
| 2010/C 209/40 | Case C-260/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 26 May 2010 — Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Rank Group PLC | 29 |
| 2010/C 209/41 | Case C-264/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 28 May 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Gheorghe Kita | 30 |
| 2010/C 209/42 | Case C-276/10: Action brought on 2 June 2010 — European Commission v Czech Republic | 30 |
| 2010/C 209/43 | Case C-278/10: Action brought on 3 June 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic | 31 |
| 2010/C 209/44 | Case C-279/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale del Riesame di Verbania (Italy) lodged on 4 June 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Matteo Minesi | 31 |
| | General Court |
| 2010/C 209/45 | Case T-237/05: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — Éditions Jacob v Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a procedure concerning a merger between undertakings — Regulation (EC) No 4064/89 — Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of investigations and audits — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process — Exception relating to the protection of legal advice) | 32 |
| 2010/C 209/46 | Case T-177/07: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2010 — Mediaset v Commission (State aid — Telecommunications — Subsidised purchase of digital decoders — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Concept of State aid — Exclusion of decoders for the reception of television programmes broadcast by satellite — Advantage — Selective nature — Adverse effect on competition — Obligation to state reasons) | 32 |
| 2010/C 209/47 | Joined Cases T-428/07 and T-455/07: Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2010 — CEVA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Contracts entered into under a specific research, technological development and demonstration programme in the field of ‘Quality of life and management of living resources (1998-2002)’ — Seahealth and Biopal projects — Debit notes — Applications for annulment — Reclassification of the actions — Admissibility — Rule that the parties should be heard and rights of the defence — Recovery of all the financial contributions paid by the European Union — Serious financial irregularities) | 33 |
| 2010/C 209/48 | Case T-118/08: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2010 — Actega Terra v OHIM (TERRAEFFEKT matt & gloss) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark TERRAEFFEKT matt & gloss — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 33 |
| 2010/C 209/49 | Case T-153/08: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2010 — Shenzhen Taiden v OHIM — Bosch Security Systems (Communications Equipment) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing communications equipment — Earlier international design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — No different overall impression — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Evidence that the earlier design was made available to the public — Article 4(1), Article 6(1)(b) and (2), Article 7(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002) | 34 |
| 2010/C 209/50 | Case T-255/08: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2010 — Montero Padilla v OHIM — Padilla Requena (JOSE PADILLA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark JOSE PADILLA — Earlier marks and sign JOSE PADILLA — Relative grounds for refusal — No well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention or trade mark with a reputation — Article 8(2)(c) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(2)(c) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — No earlier sign used in the course of trade — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 34 |
| 2010/C 209/51 | Case T-482/08: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2010 — Atlas Transport v OHIM — Hartmann (ATLAS TRANSPORT) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark ATLAS TRANSPORT — Genuine use of the trade mark — Articles 15 and 50(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Articles 15 and 51(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 35 |
| 2010/C 209/52 | Case T-487/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2010 — Kureha Corp v OHIM — Sanofi-Aventis (KREMEZIN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark KREMEZIN — Earlier international word mark KRENOSIN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Proof of existence of the earlier trade mark — Time-limits — Rules 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 35 |
| 2010/C 209/53 | Case T-490/08: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2010 — CM Capital Markets v OHIM — Carbon Capital Markets (CARBON CAPITAL MARKETS Emissions Compliance Solutions & Carbon Finance) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark CARBON CAPITAL MARKETS Emissions Compliance Solutions & Carbon Finance — Earlier Community and national figurative marks CM Capital Markets — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 36 |
| 2010/C 209/54 | Case T-547/08: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2010 — X Technology Swiss v OHIM (Orange colouring of the toe of a sock) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark — Orange colouring of the toe of a sock — Absolute ground for refusal — Absence of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 36 |
| 2010/C 209/55 | Case T-549/08: Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2010 — Luxembourg v Commission (ESF — Suspension of financial aid — Campaign against discrimination and inequality in the employment market — Serious failings in the system of management and monitoring which could lead to systemic irregularities — Article 39(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 — Legitimate expectations) | 37 |
| 2010/C 209/56 | Case T-563/08: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2010 — CM Capital Markets v OHIM — Carbon Capital Markets (CARBON CAPITAL MARKETS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CARBON CAPITAL MARKETS — Earlier Community and national figurative marks CM Capital Markets — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 37 |
| 2010/C 209/57 | Case T-138/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — Muñoz Arraiza v OHIM — Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Calificada Rioja (RIOJAVINA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark RIOJAVINA — Earlier Community collective figurative mark RIOJA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 38 |
| 2010/C 209/58 | Case T-315/09: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — Hoelzer v OHIM (SAFELOAD) (Community trade mark — Application for the figurative Community trade mark SAFELOAD — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 38 |
| 2010/C 209/59 | Case T-173/09: Order of the General Court of 3 June 2010 — Z v Commission (Access to documents — Inadmissibility — Injunction) | 38 |
| 2010/C 209/60 | Case T-79/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — COLT Télécommunications France v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Operation of a very-high-speed broadband electronic communications network — Compensation for public service costs — Decision finding that the notified measure does not constitute aid — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Lack of urgency) | 39 |
| 2010/C 209/61 | Case T-166/10: Action brought on 7 April 2010 — Samskip Multimodal Container Logistics v Commission | 39 |
| 2010/C 209/62 | Case T-220/10: Action brought on 18 May 2010 — Commission v EU Research Projects | 40 |
| 2010/C 209/63 | Case T-224/10: Action brought on 17 May 2010 — Association Belge des Consommateurs Tests-Achats v Commission | 41 |
| 2010/C 209/64 | Case T-226/10: Action brought on 14 May 2010 — Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej v Commission | 41 |
| 2010/C 209/65 | Case T-230/10: Action brought on 21 May 2010 — Spain v Commission | 42 |
| 2010/C 209/66 | Case T-231/10: Action brought on 21 May 2010 — Merlin and Others v OHIM — Dusyma (Games) | 43 |
| 2010/C 209/67 | Case T-235/10: Action brought on 21 May 2010 — Timehouse v OHIM (Shape of a watch) | 44 |
| 2010/C 209/68 | Case T-237/10: Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Vuitton Malletier v OHMI — Friis Group International (Representation of a lock device) | 44 |
| 2010/C 209/69 | Case T-238/10: Action brought on 24 May 2010 — Scatizza v OHIM — Jacinto (HORSE COUTURE) | 45 |
| 2010/C 209/70 | Case T-240/10: Action brought on 27 May 2010 — Republic of Hungary v European Commission | 46 |
| 2010/C 209/71 | Case T-241/10: Action brought on 24 May 2010 — Poland v Commission | 47 |
| 2010/C 209/72 | Case T-247/10: Action brought on 28 May 2010 — medi v OHIM — Deutsche Medi Präventions (deutschemedi.de) | 48 |
| 2010/C 209/73 | Case T-248/10: Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Italy v Commission and EPSO | 49 |
| 2010/C 209/74 | Case T-249/10: Action brought on 31 May 2010 — Kitzinger v OHIM — Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk, Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (KICO) | 49 |
| 2010/C 209/75 | Case T-250/10: Action brought on 31 May 2010 — KNUT IP Management v OHIM — Zoologischer Garten Berlin (KNUT — DER EISBÄR) | 50 |
| 2010/C 209/76 | Case T-252/10: Action brought on 28 May 2010 — Cross Czech v Commission | 51 |
| 2010/C 209/77 | Case T-500/07: Order of the General Court of 7 June 2010 — Bulgaria v Commission | 51 |
| 2010/C 209/78 | Case T-65/08: Order of the General Court of 1 June 2010 — Spain v Commission | 51 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2010/C 209/79 | Case F-30/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 11 May 2010 — Nanopoulos v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal — Admissibility — Act adversely affecting an official — Non-contractual liability — Leaks in the press — Principle of the presumption of innocence — Non-material damage — Decision to institute disciplinary proceedings — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to provide assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations) | 52 |
| 2010/C 209/80 | Case F-100/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 4 May 2010 — Petrilli v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Pensions — Concept of residence — Principal residence — Documents in support) | 52 |
| 2010/C 209/81 | Case F-13/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 12 May 2010 — Peláez Jimeno v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Previous complaint — Time-limit for the complaint — Lateness — Proof — Former member of the temporary staff — Appointment as an official — Article 5(4) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Equal treatment) | 53 |
| 2010/C 209/82 | Case F-45/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 June 2010 — Lebedef-Caponi v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal — Career development review — 2007 appraisal procedure — Action for annulment — Manifest error of assessment — Staff representatives — Opinion of ad hoc group) | 53 |
| 2010/C 209/83 | Case F-33/10: Action brought on 19 May 2010 — Lebedef v Commission | 53 |
| 2010/C 209/84 | Case F-35/10: Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Adriaansen v EIB | 54 |
| 2010/C 209/85 | Case F-36/10: Action brought on 27 May 2010 — Rapone v Commission | 54 |
| 2010/C 209/86 | Case F-38/10: Action brought on 31 May 2010 — Vakalis v Commission | 54 |
| 2010/C 209/87 | Case F-40/10: Action brought on 7 June 2010 — Lebedef v Commission | 55 |
| 2010/C 209/88 | Case F-41/10: Action brought on 7 June 2010 — Bermejo Garde v EESC | 55 |
| 2010/C 209/89 | Case F-42/10: Action brought on 3 June 2010 — Skareby v Commission | 55 |
| 2010/C 209/90 | Case F-43/10: Action brought on 4 June 2010 — Cerafogli v ECB | 56 |
| 2010/C 209/91 | Case F-44/10: Action brought on 11 June 2010 — Lebedef v Commission | 56 |
| 2010/C 209/92 | Case F-51/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 June 2010 — Petrilli v Commission | 57 |
| 2010/C 209/93 | Case F-70/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 May 2010 — Nikolchov v Commission | 57 |
| 2010/C 209/94 | Case F-94/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 May 2010 — Nikolchov v Commission | 57 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2010/C 209/03

Joined Cases C-570/07 and C-571/07: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Asturias, Spain) — José Manuel Blanco Pérez, María del Pilar Chao Gómez v Consejería de Salud y Servicios Sanitarios (C-570/07), Principado de Asturias (C-571/07) (Article 49 TFEU — Directive 2005/36/EC — Freedom of establishment — Public health — Pharmacies — Proximity — Provision of medicinal products to the public — Operating licence — Territorial distribution of pharmacies — Establishment of limits based on population density — Minimum distance between pharmacies — Candidates who have pursued professional activities on part of the national territory — Priority — Discrimination)

3

2010/C 209/04

Case C-58/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 June 2010 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queens’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom)) — The Queen on the application of Vodafone Ltd, Telefónica O2 Europe plc, T-Mobile International AG, Orange Personal Communications Services Ltd v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 — Roaming on public mobile telephone networks within the Community — Validity — Legal basis — Article 95 EC — Principles of proportionality and subsidiarity)

4

2010/C 209/05

Case C-203/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands)) — The Sporting Exchange Ltd, trading as Betfair v Minister van Justitie (Article 49 EC — Restrictions on the freedom to provide services — Games of chance — Offer of games of chance via the internet — Legislation reserving a licence to a single operator — Renewal of licence without subjecting the matter to competition — Principle of equal treatment and obligation of transparency — Application in the field of games of chance)

4

2010/C 209/06

Case C-258/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Ltd, Ladbrokes International Ltd v Stichting de Nationale Sporttotalisator (Article 49 EC — Restrictions on the freedom to provide services — Games of chance — Offer of games of chance via the internet — Legislation reserving a licence to a single operator — Refusal to grant an operating licence to an operator who is licensed in other Member States — Justification — Proportionality — Review of each specific measure applying national legislation)

5

2010/C 209/07

Case C-484/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain)) — Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid v Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc) (Directive 93/13/EEC — Consumer contracts — Terms defining the main subject-matter of the contract — Assessment by the courts as to their unfairness — Excluded — More stringent national provisions designed to afford a higher level of consumer protection)

6

2010/C 209/08

Case C-487/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 June 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Free movement of capital — Articles 56 EC and 40 of the EEA Agreement — Difference in treatment — Dividends distributed to resident and non-resident companies)

6

2010/C 209/09

Case C-491/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 June 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats — Wild fauna and flora — Sites of Community importance — Tourism complex ‘Is Arenas’)

7

2010/C 209/10

Case C-569/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht (Internet — eu Top Level Domain — Regulation (EC) No 874/2004 — Domain names — Phased registration — Special characters — Speculative and abusive registrations — Concept of ‘bad faith’)

7

2010/C 209/11

Case C-127/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Nürnberg (Germany)) — Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG (Trade-mark law — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 13(1) — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 7(1) — Exhaustion of the trade mark proprietor’s rights — Concept of ‘goods put on the market’ — Consent of the proprietor — Bottles of perfume known as ‘testers’, made available by the trade mark proprietor to an authorised specialist dealer belonging to a selective distribution network)

8

2010/C 209/12

Case C-140/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Genova (Italy)) — Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (State aid — Subsidies paid to a maritime transport undertaking discharging public service obligations — National Law providing for the possibility of making payments on account prior to the approval of an agreement)

9

2010/C 209/13

Case C-237/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium)) — Belgian State v Nathalie De Fruytier (Sixth VAT Directive — Article 13(A)(1)(d) — Exemptions for activities in the public interest — Supply of human organs, blood and milk — Activity of transporting, in a self-employed capacity, human organs and samples for hospitals and laboratories — Concepts of ‘supply of goods’ and ‘supply of services’ — Distinguishing criteria)

10

2010/C 209/14

Case C-378/09: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 June 2010 — European Commission v Czech Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 85/337/EEC — First, second and third paragraphs of Article 10a — National legislation restricting the right of action against decisions in the environmental field — Failure to transpose within the time-limit prescribed)

10

2010/C 209/15

Case C-26/10P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2010 by Paul Inge Hansen against the judgment delivered on 17 November 2009 in Case T-295/09 Paul Inge Hansen v Commission of the European Communities

11

2010/C 209/16

Case C-185/10: Action brought on 13 April 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

11

2010/C 209/17

Case C-193/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht, Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 19 April 2010 — KMB Europe BV v Hauptzollamt Duisburg

11

2010/C 209/18

Case C-201/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 26 April 2010 — Ze Fu Fleischhandel GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

12

2010/C 209/19

Case C-202/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 26 April 2010 — Vion Trading GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

12

2010/C 209/20

Case C-212/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach (Republic of Poland), lodged on 3 May 2010 — Logstor ROR Polska Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Katowicach

13

2010/C 209/21

Case C-215/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 4 May 2010 — Pacific World Limited, FDD International Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

13

2010/C 209/22

Case C-220/10: Action brought on 6 May 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

14

2010/C 209/23

Case C-226/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 11 May 2010 — Hannelore Adams v Germanwings GmbH

15

2010/C 209/24

Case C-227/10: Action brought on 7 May 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

16

2010/C 209/25

Case C-228/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 10 May 2010 — Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), British Sky Broadcasting Ltd v Euroview Sport Ltd

16

2010/C 209/26

Case C-230/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo no 3, de Almería (Spain) lodged on 11 May 2010 — Águeda María Sáenz Morales v Consejería para la Igualdad y Bienestar Social de la Junta de Andalucía

o

21

2010/C 209/27

Case C-232/10: Action brought on 10 May 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

21

2010/C 209/28

Case C-235/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — David Claes v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation)

22

2010/C 209/29

Case C-236/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — Sophie Jeanjean v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation)

22

2010/C 209/30

Case C-237/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — Miguel Remy v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation)

23

2010/C 209/31

Case C-238/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — Volker Schneider v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation)

23

2010/C 209/32

Case C-239/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg) lodged on 12 May 2010 — Xuan-Mai Tran v Landsbanki Luxembourg SA (in liquidation)

24

2010/C 209/33

Case C-242/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Sezione Terza (Italy) lodged on 17 May 2010 — ENEL Produzione SpA v Autorità per l’Energia Elettrica e il Gas

24

2010/C 209/34

Case C-243/10: Action brought on 18 May 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic

24

2010/C 209/35

Case C-247/10 P: Appeal brought on 18 May 2010 by Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co., Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 4 March 2010 in Case T-407/06: Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co., Ltd v Council of the European Union

25

2010/C 209/36

Case C-248/10: Action brought on 19 May 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

26

2010/C 209/37

Case C-249/10 P: Appeal brought on 18 May 2010 by Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 4 March 2010 in Case T-401/06: Brosmann Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union

26

2010/C 209/38

Case C-255/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Roma (Italy), made on 23 March 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Alessandro Sacchi

27

2010/C 209/39

Case C-259/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Civil Division) (England & Wales) made on 26 May 2010 — Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Rank Group PLC

28

2010/C 209/40

Case C-260/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 26 May 2010 — Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Rank Group PLC

29

2010/C 209/41

Case C-264/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 28 May 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Gheorghe Kita

30

2010/C 209/42

Case C-276/10: Action brought on 2 June 2010 — European Commission v Czech Republic

30

2010/C 209/43

Case C-278/10: Action brought on 3 June 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

31

2010/C 209/44

Case C-279/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale del Riesame di Verbania (Italy) lodged on 4 June 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Matteo Minesi

31

General Court

2010/C 209/45

Case T-237/05: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — Éditions Jacob v Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a procedure concerning a merger between undertakings — Regulation (EC) No 4064/89 — Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of investigations and audits — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process — Exception relating to the protection of legal advice)

32

2010/C 209/46

Case T-177/07: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2010 — Mediaset v Commission (State aid — Telecommunications — Subsidised purchase of digital decoders — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Concept of State aid — Exclusion of decoders for the reception of television programmes broadcast by satellite — Advantage — Selective nature — Adverse effect on competition — Obligation to state reasons)

32

2010/C 209/47

Joined Cases T-428/07 and T-455/07: Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2010 — CEVA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Contracts entered into under a specific research, technological development and demonstration programme in the field of ‘Quality of life and management of living resources (1998-2002)’ — Seahealth and Biopal projects — Debit notes — Applications for annulment — Reclassification of the actions — Admissibility — Rule that the parties should be heard and rights of the defence — Recovery of all the financial contributions paid by the European Union — Serious financial irregularities)

33

2010/C 209/48

Case T-118/08: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2010 — Actega Terra v OHIM (TERRAEFFEKT matt & gloss) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark TERRAEFFEKT matt & gloss — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

33

2010/C 209/49

Case T-153/08: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2010 — Shenzhen Taiden v OHIM — Bosch Security Systems (Communications Equipment) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing communications equipment — Earlier international design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — No different overall impression — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Evidence that the earlier design was made available to the public — Article 4(1), Article 6(1)(b) and (2), Article 7(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

34

2010/C 209/50

Case T-255/08: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2010 — Montero Padilla v OHIM — Padilla Requena (JOSE PADILLA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark JOSE PADILLA — Earlier marks and sign JOSE PADILLA — Relative grounds for refusal — No well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention or trade mark with a reputation — Article 8(2)(c) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(2)(c) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — No earlier sign used in the course of trade — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009))

34

2010/C 209/51

Case T-482/08: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2010 — Atlas Transport v OHIM — Hartmann (ATLAS TRANSPORT) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark ATLAS TRANSPORT — Genuine use of the trade mark — Articles 15 and 50(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Articles 15 and 51(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))

35

2010/C 209/52

Case T-487/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2010 — Kureha Corp v OHIM — Sanofi-Aventis (KREMEZIN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark KREMEZIN — Earlier international word mark KRENOSIN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Proof of existence of the earlier trade mark — Time-limits — Rules 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

35

2010/C 209/53

Case T-490/08: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2010 — CM Capital Markets v OHIM — Carbon Capital Markets (CARBON CAPITAL MARKETS Emissions Compliance Solutions & Carbon Finance) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark CARBON CAPITAL MARKETS Emissions Compliance Solutions & Carbon Finance — Earlier Community and national figurative marks CM Capital Markets — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

36

2010/C 209/54

Case T-547/08: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2010 — X Technology Swiss v OHIM (Orange colouring of the toe of a sock) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark — Orange colouring of the toe of a sock — Absolute ground for refusal — Absence of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

36

2010/C 209/55

Case T-549/08: Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2010 — Luxembourg v Commission (ESF — Suspension of financial aid — Campaign against discrimination and inequality in the employment market — Serious failings in the system of management and monitoring which could lead to systemic irregularities — Article 39(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 — Legitimate expectations)

37

2010/C 209/56

Case T-563/08: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2010 — CM Capital Markets v OHIM — Carbon Capital Markets (CARBON CAPITAL MARKETS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CARBON CAPITAL MARKETS — Earlier Community and national figurative marks CM Capital Markets — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

37

2010/C 209/57

Case T-138/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — Muñoz Arraiza v OHIM — Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Calificada Rioja (RIOJAVINA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark RIOJAVINA — Earlier Community collective figurative mark RIOJA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

38

2010/C 209/58

Case T-315/09: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — Hoelzer v OHIM (SAFELOAD) (Community trade mark — Application for the figurative Community trade mark SAFELOAD — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

38

2010/C 209/59

Case T-173/09: Order of the General Court of 3 June 2010 — Z v Commission (Access to documents — Inadmissibility — Injunction)

38

2010/C 209/60

Case T-79/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — COLT Télécommunications France v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Operation of a very-high-speed broadband electronic communications network — Compensation for public service costs — Decision finding that the notified measure does not constitute aid — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Lack of urgency)

39

2010/C 209/61

Case T-166/10: Action brought on 7 April 2010 — Samskip Multimodal Container Logistics v Commission

39

2010/C 209/62

Case T-220/10: Action brought on 18 May 2010 — Commission v EU Research Projects

40

2010/C 209/63

Case T-224/10: Action brought on 17 May 2010 — Association Belge des Consommateurs Tests-Achats v Commission

41

2010/C 209/64

Case T-226/10: Action brought on 14 May 2010 — Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej v Commission

41

2010/C 209/65

Case T-230/10: Action brought on 21 May 2010 — Spain v Commission

42

2010/C 209/66

Case T-231/10: Action brought on 21 May 2010 — Merlin and Others v OHIM — Dusyma (Games)

43

2010/C 209/67

Case T-235/10: Action brought on 21 May 2010 — Timehouse v OHIM (Shape of a watch)

44

2010/C 209/68

Case T-237/10: Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Vuitton Malletier v OHMI — Friis Group International (Representation of a lock device)

44

2010/C 209/69

Case T-238/10: Action brought on 24 May 2010 — Scatizza v OHIM — Jacinto (HORSE COUTURE)

45

2010/C 209/70

Case T-240/10: Action brought on 27 May 2010 — Republic of Hungary v European Commission

46

2010/C 209/71

Case T-241/10: Action brought on 24 May 2010 — Poland v Commission

47

2010/C 209/72

Case T-247/10: Action brought on 28 May 2010 — medi v OHIM — Deutsche Medi Präventions (deutschemedi.de)

48

2010/C 209/73

Case T-248/10: Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Italy v Commission and EPSO

49

2010/C 209/74

Case T-249/10: Action brought on 31 May 2010 — Kitzinger v OHIM — Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk, Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (KICO)

49

2010/C 209/75

Case T-250/10: Action brought on 31 May 2010 — KNUT IP Management v OHIM — Zoologischer Garten Berlin (KNUT — DER EISBÄR)

50

2010/C 209/76

Case T-252/10: Action brought on 28 May 2010 — Cross Czech v Commission

51

2010/C 209/77

Case T-500/07: Order of the General Court of 7 June 2010 — Bulgaria v Commission

51

2010/C 209/78

Case T-65/08: Order of the General Court of 1 June 2010 — Spain v Commission

51

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2010/C 209/79

Case F-30/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 11 May 2010 — Nanopoulos v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal — Admissibility — Act adversely affecting an official — Non-contractual liability — Leaks in the press — Principle of the presumption of innocence — Non-material damage — Decision to institute disciplinary proceedings — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to provide assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations)

52

2010/C 209/80

Case F-100/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 4 May 2010 — Petrilli v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Pensions — Concept of residence — Principal residence — Documents in support)

52

2010/C 209/81

Case F-13/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 12 May 2010 — Peláez Jimeno v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Previous complaint — Time-limit for the complaint — Lateness — Proof — Former member of the temporary staff — Appointment as an official — Article 5(4) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Equal treatment)

53

2010/C 209/82

Case F-45/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 June 2010 — Lebedef-Caponi v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal — Career development review — 2007 appraisal procedure — Action for annulment — Manifest error of assessment — Staff representatives — Opinion of ad hoc group)

53

2010/C 209/83

Case F-33/10: Action brought on 19 May 2010 — Lebedef v Commission

53

2010/C 209/84

Case F-35/10: Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Adriaansen v EIB

54

2010/C 209/85

Case F-36/10: Action brought on 27 May 2010 — Rapone v Commission

54

2010/C 209/86

Case F-38/10: Action brought on 31 May 2010 — Vakalis v Commission

54

2010/C 209/87

Case F-40/10: Action brought on 7 June 2010 — Lebedef v Commission

55

2010/C 209/88

Case F-41/10: Action brought on 7 June 2010 — Bermejo Garde v EESC

55

2010/C 209/89

Case F-42/10: Action brought on 3 June 2010 — Skareby v Commission

55

2010/C 209/90

Case F-43/10: Action brought on 4 June 2010 — Cerafogli v ECB

56

2010/C 209/91

Case F-44/10: Action brought on 11 June 2010 — Lebedef v Commission

56

2010/C 209/92

Case F-51/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 June 2010 — Petrilli v Commission

57

2010/C 209/93

Case F-70/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 May 2010 — Nikolchov v Commission

57

2010/C 209/94

Case F-94/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 May 2010 — Nikolchov v Commission

57

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN