alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
180227 UNIONS RULE 2004 MAG REF VERSION FEBRUARY 27, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Joint Motion by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal 

Employees, AFL-CIO (AFSCME), American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO (AFT), 

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of 

America, AFL-CIO (UAW), and Service Employees International Union (SEIU) for an Order 

Authorizing Discovery Under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 filed on February 27, 2018 (Case No. 17-

3283, Docket Entry No. 2595) in the above-captioned Title III proceeding is referred to 

Magistrate Judge Judith Dein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 27, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last 

four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales 

Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to 

software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2596 Filed:02/27/18 Entered:02/27/18 13:12:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
§ 624.7 Segregation of collateral. ( a ) A covered swap entity that posts any collateral other than for variation margin with respect to a non-cleared swap or a non-cleared security-based swap shall require that all funds or other property other than variation margin provided by the covered swap entity be held by one or more custodians that are not the covered swap entity or counterparty and not affiliates of the covered swap entity or the counterparty.
( b ) A covered swap entity that collects initial margin required by § 624.3(a) with respect to a non-cleared swap or a non-cleared security-based swap shall require that such initial margin be held by one or more custodians that are not the covered swap entity or counterparty and not affiliates of the covered swap entity or the counterparty.
( c ) For purposes of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the custodian must act pursuant to a custody agreement that: ( 1 ) Prohibits the custodian from rehypothecating, repledging, reusing, or otherwise transferring (through securities lending, securities borrowing, repurchase agreement, reverse repurchase agreement or other means) the collateral held by the custodian, except that cash collateral may be held in a general deposit account with the custodian if the funds in the account are used to purchase an asset described in § 624.6(a)(2) or (b), such asset is held in compliance with this § 624.7, and such purchase takes place within a time period reasonably necessary to consummate such purchase after the cash collateral is posted as initial margin; and
( 2 ) Is a legal, valid, binding, and enforceable agreement under the laws of all relevant jurisdictions, including in the event of bankruptcy, insolvency, or a similar proceeding.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(1) of this section, a custody agreement may permit the posting party to substitute or direct any reinvestment of posted collateral held by the custodian, provided that, with respect to collateral collected by a covered swap entity pursuant to § 624.3(a) or posted by a covered swap entity pursuant to § 624.3(b), the agreement requires the posting party to: ( 1 ) Substitute only funds or other property that would qualify as eligible collateral under § 624.6, and for which the amount net of applicable discounts described in appendix B of this part would be sufficient to meet the requirements of § 624.3; and
( 2 ) Direct reinvestment of funds only in assets that would qualify as eligible collateral under § 624.6, and for which the amount net of applicable discounts described in appendix B of this part would be sufficient to meet the requirements of § 624.3.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24362 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/30/23 15:03:59 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24362 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/30/23 15:03:59 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24362 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/30/23 15:03:59 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24362 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/30/23 15:03:59 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 4
§ 129.109 Supplemental inspections for U.S.-registered aircraft. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to U.S.-registered, transport category, turbine powered airplanes with a type certificate issued after January 1, 1958 that as a result of original type certification or later increase in capacity have— ( 1 ) A maximum type certificated passenger seating capacity of 30 or more; or
( 2 ) A maximum payload capacity of 7,500 pounds or more.
( b ) *General requirements.* After December 20, 2010, a certificate holder may not operate an airplane under this part unless the following requirements have been met: ( 1 ) *Baseline Structure.* The certificate holder's maintenance program for the airplane includes FAA-approved damage-tolerance-based inspections and procedures for airplane structure susceptible to fatigue cracking that could contribute to a catastrophic failure. For the purpose of this section, this structure is termed “fatigue critical structure.”
( 2 ) *Adverse effects of repairs, alterations, and modifications.* The maintenance program for the airplane includes a means for addressing the adverse effects repairs, alterations, and modifications may have on fatigue critical structure and on inspections required by paragraph (b)(1) of this section. The means for addressing these adverse effects must be approved by the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office.
( 3 ) *Changes to maintenance program.* The changes made to the maintenance program required by paragraph (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section, and any later revisions to these changes, must be submitted to the Principal Maintenance Inspector for review and approval.
[Doc. No. FAA-1999-5401, 70 FR 5532, Feb. 2, 2005. Redesignated by Amdt. 129-43, 72 FR 63413, Nov. 8, 2007; Amdt. 129-44, 72 FR 70508, Dec. 12, 2007; Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 129-53, 83 FR 9174, Mar. 5, 2018]
#### HEATH *v.*TYSON.

Subjecting land to a justice’s judgment — sci.fa'. cannot issue to another county — appearance may cure the defect.

A scire facias to subject real estate to a judgment before a justice of the peace, cannot be issued to any other county than that where the judgment is.

If such has issued into another county, and has been served and returned, the proceeding to judgment upon it is a nullity, unless the defendant appears, and in that way cures the defect.

Error to the Common Pleas. The case below was a scire facias against Pleath, to show cause why execution should not issue against his lands upon a justice’s judgment. The writ was issued in Richland county, directed to the sheriff of Franklin, and was by him served and returned. No cause being shown, an order of execution was made on the default, and judgment rendered for costs.

Pleath now claims to reverse the judgment and order, because the proceeding was unauthorized.

Wood, J.

The justices’act (29 *O. L.*185,6) provides, that in case of a return of no goods, on a justice’s execution, and a suggestion that the judgment debtor has real estate, a transcript may be filed with the clerk of the Court of Common Pleas, in the county where the defendant resides, upon which the clerk is authorized to issue a scire facias against the debtor, to show cause at the return term why execution,should not issue against his lands, which writ is to be served and returned in the same manner summonses are *443required by law to be served, and if no cause is shown, the court is to give judgment for costs, and award execution against the lands for the sum due, interest and costs.' No authority is here given to issue a scire facias from one county to another, or to issue any writ except where the defendant resides. No reason appears to us for issuing this writ to Franklin, and as there was no appearance to the suit to cure the defect, the proceeding is of no avail, and must be reversed, with costs.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00789

- CV

J. N. , Appellant

v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. C190072CPS , THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH WATK INS , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM
Appellant J. N. filed her notice of appeal on September 28, 2022 . The appellate

record was complete on December 13, 2022 , making appellant’s brief due on January 2, 2023

.
On Decembe r 30, 2022
, counsel for appel l ant filed a motion for extension of time to file

appellant’s brief.
The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days

for cou r t’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion in part and order Daniel A. Clar k to file

appellant’s brief no later than January 2 3 , 202 3 . If the brief i s not filed by that date, counsel may

be required to show cause why he should not b e held in contempt of court.2 It is ordered on January 13, 2023

.

Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith
(LOGO) Katz, Katz & Sparks, P.C.

Certified Public Accountants Business Development Consultants

Independent Accountant's Report

To American City Mortgage Corporation

We  have  examined   management's   assertion   about   American  City  Mortgage
Corporation's  compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage  Bankers  (USAP) as of and for the year ended October 31, 1998 included
in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for American
City Mortgage  Corporation's  compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's  assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis, evidence about American City Mortgage Corporation's
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not  provide a legal  determination  on  American  City  Mortgage  Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion,  management's  assertion that American City Mortgage Corporation
complied with the aforementioned  minimum servicing  standards as of and for the
year ended October 31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KATZ, KATZ & SPARKS, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants


Westlake Village, California
January 21, 1999

3075 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd., #100,  Westlake Village,  CA 91362 o 805-496-4140 o
FAX 805-496-8004 (degree) E-Mail: KKSCPA@aol.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998             JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1997             MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997             JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                           2,777                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,951                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,795                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     95,467                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,233                       0
<PP&E>                                         110,167                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,907                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 338,976                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,931                       0
<BONDS>                                        165,100                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,347                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,514                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   388,976                       0
<SALES>                                        147,718                  72,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,718                  72,517
<CGS>                                           92,322                  44,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,322                  44,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,347                   4,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,176)                  (2,163)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,535)                  (1,061)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,641)                  (1,102)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,641)                  (1,102)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE

BULLETIN 1028-U

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AND AIR FORCE PLATE 80
172°30' 45" 1B _ _ Lees)
— ies =
aie > &
| Zi
| _ fry
Kresta Point liarte Cove =e 0 C
53°00 + - S + —{ 53°00"
a << OTha Lf
ay \ Red Head d
, =
Qal
) Austin Cove
STELLER COVE 2 id
Oo—ZJ
Auburn Cove Blonde ( =
o Cove i
Brunette Cove iy
Q
f
j . Cooper Islands
° = 7
a Gibson Island
HOLTZ BAY 3
z Os
Kennon Island
q
o Here"
Yoo 8
“y"
West Arm @
o oO
Cape Wrangell f Khlebnikof Point
| eH y)
|
Etienne Head i)
" ETIENNE BAY
Point Poker
2
Cape Hodikof
9 O
EXPLANATION Pupeis Cite
2 SEDIMENTARY AND EXTRUSIVE ROCKS °
5 = 7 SARANA BAY
52/30" + s { Qal | QF! Qb —|52'30"
Alluvium Beach deposits >
Qal, valley-fill alluvium; includes Includes some narrow stretches of iz
old beach deposits in lower parte bare rock shore platform 3
| of some valleys [ra
: Qf, alluvial fan deposits Li Mikhail Point |
i 3 " E o
aE <
= “Qt [Qt 2 Bt, Schuler O
Glacial till Beas
Qt, ground moraine deposits
Qtm, terminal or lateral moraine deposits ABRAHAM BAY
Sa- x >
7 oo = 8
23 re
é 2 Faneto Formation Massacre Bay Formation G =
a Coarse red sandstone and Basaltic and andesitic lava, and Ee Chirikof Point
RE conglomerate pyroclastic and coarse clastic as
S84 re a rocks Ws 7 Loaf Island
y L 3 L MASSACRE BAY ir
5 Chuniksak Formation 5 Chirikof Formation ee Se
3 Fine-grained laminated siliceous, S Conglomerate, sandstone, carbona- >
= argillitic, and limy sedimentary a ceous shale, and possibly one lava ‘a Barabara McCloud Head
L rocks 3 flow; small outcrop on Chirikof < Point
= Point. May be same age as Nev- oa
idiskow Formation i iS
i
= "
Point
Nevidiskov Formation Gasco Poin
Coarse graywacke and conglomerate °
Alexai Point
ek °
s BS 8 re TEMNAC BAY
8
$ & Basement rocks Ns =< oc
=o TNef, fine-grained banded sedimentary rocks Bor Savage Island > © ®
RS Tic, coarse and conglomeratic sedimentary rocks MG e fos
S TMev, voleanic rocks, including basaltic, spilitic, and SF °
5 keratophyric lava and tuff 4 Wes
‘est Arm o
C °
Se INTRUSIVE ROCKS fa ; i tnsdezint : BY Ss
Ss Wx Chuniksak Point
= a pa 7
H Fl ae : ,
538 3s 7
Se Hornblende andesite and dacite gs re Quartz keratophyre dikes e QTak 20, nN g
& § Porphyritic dikes and stocks ae > Krasni Point
Bs rr é a?
ss Ter i NEVIDISKOV BAY N
[v4
i Diabase and gabbro dikes, sills, Albite granite Ee
and small plutons
Contact
Dashed where approximately located
EE
© Fault
Dashed where fracture or fault is inferred from
mapping or aerial photographs; U, upthrown side; 7
seas | Donte oe 4 PACIFIC O C,.E AN + seas
| ey
| Strike and dip of beds © Theodore Point
|
L ee a 7 _ - — = __ On —— = a ese

Base from U.S. Geological Survey,
Attu 1:250,000, 1953

GEOLOGIC MAP OF ATTU, NEAR ISLANDS, ALASKA

SCALE 1:63 360
1 Ya o 1 2) Bi 4 MILES

1.510. 1 2) 2 4 KILOMETERS
[-s-e-eieas 1

DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
SHORELINE SHOWN REPRESENTS THE APPROXIMATE LINE OF MEAN HIGH WATER
1971 MAGNETIC DECLINATION VARIES FROM 2° TO 2°30’ EAST

Geology by Olcott Gates, H. A. Powers,
R. E. Wilcox, J. P. Schafer, and
F. M. Byers Jr; 1949-50
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 355

To provide wage parity for certain Department of Defense prevailing rate 

employees in Alabama. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2003

Mr. EVERETT (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, and Mr. ROGERS of Alabama) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Government Reform 

A BILL

To provide wage parity for certain Department of Defense 

prevailing rate employees in Alabama.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAGE PARITY FOR CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF 

4 DEFENSE EMPLOYEES IN ALABAMA. 

5 The wage schedules and rates applicable to prevailing 

6 rate employees (as defined in section 5342 of title 5, 

7 United States Code) of the Department of Defense in the 

8 Montgomery, Alabama, wage area shall be the same as 

9 the wage schedules and rates applicable to prevailing rate 
2

•HR 355 IH 

1 employees of the Department of Defense in the Bir2 mingham, Alabama, wage area. 

3 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

4 This Act shall take effect beginning with the first pay 

5 period beginning on or after the date of enactment of this 

6 Act.

Æ
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Linda Kay Pharis, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00240

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Parker County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CCL1

- 11

- 00779 ). Opinion deli vered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to remove the

“ day to day ” language

. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Linda Kay Pharis, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

REND ERED JUNE 17, 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 141.73 Privileges. ( a ) The holder of a pilot school certificate or a provisional pilot school certificate may advertise and conduct approved pilot training courses in accordance with the certificate and any ratings that it holds.
( b ) A pilot school that holds examining authority for an approved training course may recommend a graduate of that course for the issuance of an appropriate pilot, flight instructor, or ground instructor certificate and rating, without taking an FAA knowledge test or practical test, provided the training course has been approved and meets the minimum ground and flight training time requirements of this part.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3754 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to make 

a technical correction to the water rights settlement for the ShoshonePaiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2020 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

2009 to make a technical correction to the water rights 

settlement for the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck 

Valley Reservation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Technical Correction 

5 to the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Res6 ervation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3754 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON 

2 TRUST FUNDS ESTABLISHED UNDER SETTLE3 MENT. 

4 Section 10807 of the Omnibus Public Land Manage5 ment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1408) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b)(3)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘There is’’ and inserting 

9 the following: 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and 

11 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(B) INTEREST PAYMENTS.—There is au13 thorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for 

14 deposit into the Development Fund the interest 

15 that would have accrued during the period be16 ginning on October 1, 2009, and ending on 

17 January 25, 2016, on balances held in the De18 velopment Fund, as calculated using the appli19 cable rate for interest-bearing obligations of the 

20 United States if the amounts in the Develop21 ment Fund had been invested in accordance 

22 with— 

23 ‘‘(i) the Act of April 1, 1880 (21 Stat. 

24 70, chapter 41; 25 U.S.C. 161); and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3754 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) the first section of the Act of 

2 June 24, 1938 (52 Stat. 1037, chapter 

3 648; 25 U.S.C. 162a).’’; and 

4 (2) in subsection (c)(3)— 

5 (A) by striking ‘‘There is’’ and inserting 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and 

8 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(B) INTEREST PAYMENTS.—There is au10 thorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for 

11 deposit into the Maintenance Fund the interest 

12 that would have accrued during the period be13 ginning on October 1, 2009, and ending on 

14 January 25, 2016, on balances held in the 

15 Maintenance Fund, as calculated using the ap16 plicable rate for interest-bearing obligations of 

17 the United States if the amounts in the Mainte18 nance Fund had been invested in accordance 

19 with— 

20 ‘‘(i) the Act of April 1, 1880 (21 Stat. 

21 70, chapter 41; 25 U.S.C. 161); and 

22 ‘‘(ii) the first section of the Act of 

23 June 24, 1938 (52 Stat. 1037, chapter 

24 648; 25 U.S.C. 162a).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS