alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000797542
<NAME> ZAXIS INTERNATIONAL INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          42,428
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,500)
<INVENTORY>                                     64,665
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               258,043
<PP&E>                                         510,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 406,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 390,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,954,694
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,476
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,569,371)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   390,525
<SALES>                                        303,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303,707
<CGS>                                          383,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  383,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               898,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (134,545)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,025,949)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,025,949)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,025,949)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
#### § 1263.108 Procedure in the event of an adverse ruling.

If the court or other authority which caused the demand to be issued declines to stay the effect of the demand pending a final decision by the General Counsel or designate; or if the General Counsel or designate directs that the employee may not comply with the demand, and a court or other authority rules that the demand must be complied with irrespective of that decision, the employee upon whom the demand has been made, or an agency or other governmental attorney, shall respectfully decline to comply with the demand and shall cite, “United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, et al., 340 U.S. 462 (1951).”
§ 14.04 Standards for awards. ( a ) A prevailing applicant may receive an award for attorney fees and other expenses incurred in connection with a proceeding, or in a significant and discrete substantive portion of the proceeding, unless the position of the agency over which the applicant has prevailed was substantially justified. Whether or not the position of the FAA was substantially justified shall be determined on the basis of the record (including the record with respect to the action or failure to act by the agency upon which the civil action is based) which was made in the civil action for which fees and other expenses are sought. The burden of proof that an award should not be made to an eligible prevailing applicant is on the agency counsel, who may avoid an award by showing that the agency's position was reasonable in law and fact.
( b ) An award will be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or unreasonably protracted the proceeding or if special circumstances make the award sought unjust.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3846 

To observe the lives lost in the United States due to the COVID–19 pandemic. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 1, 2020 

Mr. SCHUMER (for Mr. SCHATZ (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. COONS, 

Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. BENNET, Ms. 

SMITH, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. KAINE, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. WARREN, Mr. TESTER, Mr. MARKEY, Mrs. 

FEINSTEIN, Mr. BROWN, and Mr. BOOKER)) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To observe the lives lost in the United States due to the 

COVID–19 pandemic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Pandemic 

5 Moment of Silence Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR THE VICTIMS OF THE 

7 COVID–19 PANDEMIC. 

8 The President shall issue a proclamation calling on 

9 the people of the United States to observe a moment of 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3846 CPS

1 silence at 12:00pm (local time) on Monday, June 1, 2020, 

2 as a mark of respect to the memory of the more than 

3 100,000 lives lost in the United States due to the COVID– 

4 19 pandemic, and their families. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                  EXHIBIT 10.9

                      SIGNATORIES TO AGREEMENTS RESPECTING
                                CHANGE OF CONTROL

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS                         DATES
<S>                                    <C>
David J. Calabro                       April 14, 1999

Howard Cohen*                          March 5, 2001*

Marc Crisafulli                        March 29, 2001

Kathleen McKeough                      June 28, 2000

Timothy Nyman                          August 7, 2000

Jaymin B. Patel                        March 22, 2000

Antonio Carlos Rocha                   April 2, 2001

Larry Smith                            May 7, 2001

Donald Sweitzer                        October 13, 1998

W. Bruce Turner**                      August 6, 2002
</TABLE>

* Change of control provisions incorporated into employment agreement.
Employment terminated in August 2002.

** Change of control provisions incorporated into employment agreement.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 10828 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**David Earl Kates,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:97

- CR

- 42

- 1

Before **Southwick, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * David Earl Kates, federal prisoner # 30428

- 077 , was convicted by a jury of possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine base and his sentence included a term of supervised release. Now that his supervised release has

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 3, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-10828 Document: 00516223463 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2022No. 21

- 10828

2 been revoked, he contends that the within

- guidelines 11

- month revocation sentence is substantively unreasonable.
Kates specifically concedes that the revocation sentence was not illegal and was not the result of an error in the g uidelines calculations. Instead, h e argues that the current sentence is substantively unreasonable
because the district court did not consi der that the total sentence imposed for the 1997 offense was much greater than if the offense were committed today because he would no longer be considered a career offender.

We review Kates’s revocation sentence to determine whether it is “plainly unreaso nable.” United States v. Miller , 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th
Cir. 2011). We review the substantive reasonableness of the sentence for an abuse of discretion, examining the totality of the circumstances. United
States v. Fuentes , 906 F.3d 322, 325 (5th Cir. 2 018). “ A revocation sentence is substantively unreasonable if it (1) does not account for a factor that should have received significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or (3) represents a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors .” United States v. Badgett , 957 F.3d 536, 541 (5th Cir.) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), cert. denied , 141 S. Ct. 827 (2020). “ If a sentence is unreasonable, then we consider whether the error
was obvi ous under existing law. ” Miller , 634 F.3d at 843.

Kates fail s to make such a showing and fails to show that his revocation sentence is plainly unreasonable

.
**AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-10828 Document: 00516223463 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/03/2022
0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Map 175

Roundup Harlowton

T7N

Pompeys Pillar

T Big Timber 1N Billings T2 Columbus S

Bridger

T8S

R18E R29E Montana

R104W R93W

T Wyoming 57N

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in April 2015

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Legend

Sage Grouse PMHA and 

GMHA and Minor 

Right-of-Way Allocations

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Sage Grouse PMHA 

Sage Grouse GMHA

Rights-of-Way Avoidance

Rights-of-Way Exclusion

Rights-of-Way Open

^ Towns

Public Lands Survey System
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1032 PLATE 8

EXPLANATION

PRE-CAMBRIAN

‘Contact, dashed where inferred

Fault, showing dip; dashed where
‘aul SPprontnately located
os

Plunge of minor anticline

ja
Besring and plunge of lineation

‘Strike and dip of foliation

‘Strike and dip of foliation and plunge of lineation

ae

MAMMOTH(?) VEIN

4.in. of disseminated quartz,

_— Brecciated wall rock with
‘and disseminated

‘6p, breccia zone with thinly
‘disseminated pyrite, quartz,
‘and galena

of the late

F—— Disseminated quartz and pyrite with
Bpdeclgaenaendsphtete. Lim
fenton the fookvall

Northeast drift is 8 ft lower
‘than southwest drift

yrite cuts diagonally eastward across
{his zone; some small erratic stringers
‘sulfides

Join tive

Join tine

INDEX MAP

500 9 1000 Feet

GEOLOGIC MAP OF PART OF THE LAMARTINE TUNNEL, FREELAND-LAMARTINE DISTRICT, COLORADO
Ps o
: ; = ace ea *

Geology by J. E. Harrison and J. D. Wells, 1952

370788 © - 56 (In pocket) No. 5
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 **Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Mack I. Whittle, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of The South Financial Group, Inc. (“TSFG”) certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 of TSFG (the “Report”): 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TSFG. 

 

 

/s/  Mack I. Whittle, Jr.   

Mack I. Whittle, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

The South Financial Group, Inc.

August 8, 2007

 

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The South Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ron Howell, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 15, 2011  \s\ Ron Howell Ron Howell Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, James Clark, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofCritical Path, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstance under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 15, 2004         /s/ JAMES CLARK   James Clark   Chief Financial Officer andExecutive Vice President   
131
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-18 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, that:

     -    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     -    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the Corporations financial condition and results of
          operations of the corporation as of the dates and for the periods
          expressed in this quarterly report.


/s/ John J. Remaley
-------------------------------------
John J. Remaley,
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: August 9, 2006


                                       27
#### J. B. Smith, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Florida Power Company, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Citrus County.

*G. W. Scofield*and *W. K. Zewadski,*for Plaintiff in Error;-

*R. L. Anderson,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

The disposition of this case is governed by the decision this day rendered in Davis v. Florida Power Co.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for appropriate proceedings.

Shackleford, C. J., dissents.
ERROR.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

January Term, 1897.]

Day, Price and Norris, JJ.

[The judges of the Third Circuit sitting in the First Circuit.]

#### Jno. Krause v. Amanda E. Stichtenoth et al.

Not a Final Order to which Error will Die.

A ruling of the common pleas court sustaining a demurrer, and granting leave to amend, is not a final order to which error will lie.

Day, J.

The ruling of the court of common pleas, sustaining the demurrer to the petition in this case, and granting leave to amend the pleading in ten days, is not a final order to which error will lie.

The petition in error is dismissed.
# Official Journal C 448/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 448 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6323 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 448

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6323 December 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations |
| 2020/C 448/01 | Decision of the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations of 26 November 2020 not to register Alliance for Peace and Freedom ASBL | 1 |
| | European Food Safety Authority |
| 2020/C 448/02 | Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) mission | 4 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations

2020/C 448/01

Decision of the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations of 26 November 2020 not to register Alliance for Peace and Freedom ASBL

1

European Food Safety Authority

2020/C 448/02

Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) mission

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2020/C 448/03 | Decision | 5 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2020/C 448/03

Decision

5

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2577-2578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1020]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Buffalo Rapids Watershed, Montana

AGENCY:  Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.

ACTION:  Notice of Finding Of No Significant Impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Guidelines (40 
CFS Part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Guidelines (7 CFR Part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an 
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the Buffalo 
Rapids Watershed, Custer, Dawson, and Prairie Counties, Montana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Shirley Gammon, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 10 East 
Babcock, Room 443, Bozeman, Montana, 59715, telephone (406) 587-6813.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, Shirley Gammon, State Conservationist, has 
determined that the preparation and review of an environmental impact 
statement are not needed for this project.
    The project concerns a plan for agricultural water management and 
watershed protection. The planned works of improvement include 19,000 
acres of irrigation water management, nutrient management and 
conservation crop rotation; 2,100 acres of pest management; 500 acres 
of prescribed grazing; 65 miles of gated pipe; 30 miles of on-farm 
pipelines; 1,900 acres of center pivots; 1,900 acres of land leveling; 
73 miles of lateral pipelines; improvements to 12 feedlots; and 8,000 
acres of polyacrylamide application.
    The Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been 
forwarded to the Environmental

[[Page 2578]]

Protection Agency and to various federal, state, and local agencies and 
interested parties. A limited number of copies of the FONSI are 
available to fill single copy requests at the above address. Basic data 
developed during the environmental evaluation are on file and may be 
reviewed by contacting David Heilig.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be 
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.

(This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under No. 10.904--Watershed Protection and Flood 
Prevention--and is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 
12372, which requires entrgovernmental consultation with state and 
local officials.)

    Dated: January 3, 2000.
Shirley Gammon,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 00-1020 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M