alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 650.40 Creditor claims. ( a ) Upon appointment, the receiver shall promptly publish a notice to creditors to present their claims against the Corporation, with proof thereof, to the receiver by a date specified in the notice, which shall be not less than 90 calendar days after the first publication. The notice shall be republished approximately 30 days and 60 days after the first publication. The receiver shall promptly send, by first class mail, a similar notice to any creditor shown on the Corporation's books at the creditor's last address appearing thereon. Claims filed after the specified date shall be disallowed except as the receiver may approve them for full or partial payment from the Corporation's assets remaining undistributed at the time of approval.
( b ) The receiver shall allow any claim that is timely received and proved to the receiver's satisfaction. The receiver may disallow in whole or in part any creditor's claim or claim of security, preference, or priority that is not proved to the receiver's satisfaction or is not timely received and shall notify the claimant of the disallowance and reason therefor. Sending the notice of disallowance by first class mail to the claimant's address appearing on the proof of claim shall be sufficient notice. The disallowance shall be final unless, within 30 days after the notice of disallowance is mailed, the claimant files a written request for payment regardless of the disallowance. The receiver shall reconsider any claim upon the timely request of the claimant and may approve or disapprove such claim in whole or in part.
( c ) Creditors' claims that are allowed shall be paid by the receiver from time to time, to the extent funds are available therefor and in accordance with the priorities established in this part and in such manner and amounts as the receiver deems appropriate. In the event the Corporation has a claim against a creditor of the Corporation, the receiver shall offset the amount of such claim against the claim asserted by such creditor.
#### M. F. SWEENEY AND ANOTHER v. VILLAGE OF ELLSWORTH.1

December 1, 1916.

No. 20,231.

Bond — unapproved bond on appeal.

A bond on appeal, in form a *supersedeas,*but not approved as required by statute or at all, does not stay further proceedings in the district court or prevent that court from dismissing the action. [Reporter.]

Appeal and error — moot question.

The action having been dismissed in the district court for want of prosecution, a prior appeal from an order granting a motion to strike out an amended reply as frivolous, presents merely a moot question and will be dismissed. [Reporter.]

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Nobles county.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal was granted.

*C. D. & R. D. O'Brien,*for appellants.

*A. J. Daley,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 159 N. W. 1067.

Per Curiam.

Action *to*recover a reward offered by defendant village for the apprehension and conviction of the murderer or murderers of one Dillehay. De*475fendant answered, setting up a number of defenses. Plaintiff replied to this answer, -and, after an order requiring the reply to be made more definite and certain, served an amended reply. Defendant moved to strike out this amended reply as sham and frivolous. This motion was granted, and plaintiff appealed from the order. Defendant moves to dismiss this appeal, urging two grounds: (1) That the order is not appealable. (2) That the appeal presents a moot question only, because, after the appeal was taken, the case came on for trial in the court below, and was dismissed for want of prosecution.

We do not need to decide whether or not the order is appealable, as it seems clear that the appeal should be dismissed on the second ground urged. While the bond on appeal was in form a *supersedeas,*it was not approved as required by the statute or at all. It .therefore did not stay further proceedings in the district court, and that court had power to make the order of dismissal. The case having been dismissed, the appeal from the order striking out the reply presents nothing but a moot question.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the use of our report dated April8, 2005 with respect to GB&T Bancshares, Inc. management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which report isincluded in this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A and incorporated byreference in the previously filed Registration Statements of GB&TBancshares, Inc. on Form S-3D (File Number 333-64197), Form S-8 (File Number333-102666) and Form S-8 (File Number 333-121979).

 

 
|             | /s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC |   |
|------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|             |                           |   |
|             |                           |   |
| Atlanta, Georgia |                           |   |
| April 22, 2005   |                           |   |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(c)



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors of Nationwide Life and Annuity Company of America and
Contractowners of Nationwide Provident VA Separate Account A:



We consent to the use of our reports for Nationwide Provident VA Separate
Account A dated March 31, 2003, for Nationwide Life and Annuity Company of
America dated January 28, 2003 and for Providentmutual Life and Annuity Company
of America dated January 28, 2003 included herein, and to the reference to our
firm under the heading "Experts" in the Statement of Additional Information
(33-65512).


/s/ KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP



Philadelphia, PA
April 29, 2003
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00127-CR

RITA LYNN EVANS, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

 Appellee

From the 278th District Court

Leon County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21-0108CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found Rita Lynn Evans guilty of two counts of the first-degree felony 

offense of solicitation to commit capital murder. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 15.03(a). 

The trial court assessed Evans’s punishment on each count at thirty years confinement in 

the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division, to run concurrently. See

TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.32. This appeal ensued. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Evans’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief in 

support of the motion asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and 
Evans v. State Page 2

that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel’s brief evidences a professional evaluation of the 

record for error and compliance with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude 

that counsel has performed the duties required of appointed counsel. See id. at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812–13 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978); see 

also Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 

S.W.3d 403, 407–09 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).

In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, “after a full examination of all the 

proceedings, . . . decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 349–50, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 

(1988); accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509–11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal

is “wholly frivolous” or “without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy 

v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 438 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988). 

After a review of the entire record in this appeal, we have determined the appeal to be 

wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of Evans is granted.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice
Evans v. State Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed May 23, 2024

Do not publish

[CR25]
CERTIFIED TRANSLATION 

I, Juan E. Segarra, USCCI #06-067/translator, certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate

translation, to the best of my abilities, of the document in Spanish which I have seen.

SJ2023CV04406 05/22/2023 05:03:56 pm Entry No. 12 Page 1 de 1

Exhibit IV

[seal:] UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO; 1903

GOVERNING BOARD

UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO

CERTIFICATION NUMBER 142

2022-2023

I, Dr. Margarita E. Villamil Torres, secretary of the Governing Board of the University of Puerto 

Rico, hereby CERTIFY THAT:

The Governing Board, by way of a referendum held on May 4 through 5, 2023, with the prior 

recommendation of the Board Committee on Affairs of the Retirement System, agreed:

To amend Certification No. 52 (2022-2023) establishing that the new 

implementation date of the Defined Contribution Plan for new employees shall be 

May 31, 2023. 

As of May 31, 2023, the existing Pension Plan of the University of Puerto Rico 

shall be closed to new participants. 

AND FOR THE RECORD, I hereby issue this Certification, in San Juan, Puerto Rico, today, May 

8, 2023. 

[seal:] UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO; 1903 [signature]

Margarita E. Villamil Torres

Secretary 

PO BOX 23326 SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO 00931-3326

TEL. (787) 758-7196

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-43 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Exhibit 4 to Motion to Dismiss Dkt 12-4 Page 1 of 1
§ 121.619 Alternate airport for destination: IFR or over-the-top: Domestic operations. ( a ) No person may dispatch an airplane under IFR or over-the-top unless he lists at least one alternate airport for each destination airport in the dispatch release. When the weather conditions forecast for the destination and first alternate airport are marginal at least one additional alternate must be designated. However, no alternate airport is required if for at least 1 hour before and 1 hour after the estimated time of arrival at the destination airport the appropriate weather reports or forecasts, or any combination of them, indicate— ( 1 ) The ceiling will be at least 2,000 feet above the airport elevation; and
( 2 ) Visibility will be at least 3 miles.
( b ) For the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the weather conditions at the alternate airport must meet the requirements of § 121.625.
( c ) No person may dispatch a flight unless he lists each required alternate airport in the dispatch release.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19222, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-159, 45 FR 41594, June 19, 1980]
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**I, Martin D. Kidder, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006of Verso Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:November 17, 2006       /s/ Martin D. Kidder         Martin D. Kidder,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>     1000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>            OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                       257
<SECURITIES>                   1094
<RECEIVABLES>                 28
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                   19
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  0 
<PP&E>                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      5714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          0
<BONDS>                        0
<COMMON>                       8644
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<OTHER-SE>                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5714
<SALES>                          43
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             294
<CGS>                            21
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    28
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             237
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               44
<INCOME-TAX>                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                  44
<EPS-PRIMARY>                .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                  0
                             

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Subpart I of Part 121

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart I of part 121 appear at 60 FR 65928, Dec. 20, 1995.

#### § 121.197 Airplanes: Turbine engine powered: Landing limitations: Alternate airports.

No person may list an airport as an alternate airport in a dispatch or flight release for a turbine engine powered airplane unless (based on the assumptions in § 121.195 (b)) that airplane at the weight anticipated at the time of arrival can be brought to a full stop landing within 70 percent of the effective length of the runway for turbopropeller powered airplanes and 60 percent of the effective length of the runway for turbojet powered airplanes, from a point 50 feet above the intersection of the obstruction clearance plane and the runway. In the case of an alternate airport for departure, as provided in § 121.617, allowance may be made for fuel jettisoning in addition to normal consumption of fuel and oil when determining the weight anticipated at the time of arrival.

[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19198, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-9, 30 FR 8572, July 7, 1965; Amdt. 121-179, 47 FR 33390, Aug. 2, 1982]
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2


(PGS LOGO)


ADDENDUM TO CEO SVEIN RENNEMO'S EMPLOYEE CONTRACT:

SHARE BONUS TO SUBSTITUTE OPTION SCHEME

BACKGROUND: To release the company from its implied obligation to CEO Svein
Rennemo (SR) regarding the potential provision of share options described in
his employee contract, the Chairman of the Board has discussed and agreed with
SR that he as a substitute to the option scheme will receive a bonus up to NOK
650 000. He is committed to invest the gross amount in PGS shares in accordance
with the below mentioned prerequisites.

1.  PURCHASE OF PGS SHARES

Payment according to the agreement is conditional upon an amount equal to the
gross bonus (including withholding of taxes on salary payments) paid by PGS
being invested by SR in PGS shares on the OSE within one calendar month
following payment from PGS. The time limit may be extended by the Remuneration
Committee in the event of restrictions on trading in shares in PGS by CEO.

SR shall notify PGS' Remuneration Committee of the number of shares acquired
pursuant to this Bonus scheme.

2.  DISPOSAL OF SHARES

Shares acquired pursuant this bonus may not be sold by SR prior to three years
after the date of purchase of the shares, irrespective of whether the
employment is terminated within the period. If SR, due to illness or other
personal matters experiences a material adverse financial situation, the
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee, with the agreement of the Board, may
consent to the employee selling shares.

3.  TAXES AND HOLIDAY PAYMENT

PGS will be responsible for withholding taxes on payments to SR hereunder
pursuant to applicable legislation, and all payroll taxes payable on payment of
salaries and bonuses. SR will be responsible for, and hold PGS harmless of,
any other charges to taxes on payments hereunder.

PGS and SR agree that all claims for holiday payments or similar benefits to
the employees are included in the payment obligations of PGS hereunder.

4.  RESTRICTIONS ON TRADING IN SHARES

SR undertake to observe and comply with all restrictions applicable to
management of PGS in respect of trading in securities.

5.  EFFECTS OF BREACH OF OBLIGATIONS TO ACQUIRE OR RETAINS SHARES

SR's failing, for whatever reason, to comply with the obligations to acquire
shares in PGS, or to retain such shares, shall repay to PGS any shortfall of
investments pursuant to Clause 1 within 30 days of a written request by PGS.

Upon written request by PGS, SR shall immediately submit evidence of compliance
with his obligations hereunder.



Lysake, 08.06.04

/s/ Jens Ulltveit-Moe                        /s/ Svein Rennemo
-------------------------------              -------------------------------
Jens Ulltveit-Moe                            Svein Rennemo
Chairman of the Board                        Chief Executive Officer
§ 1204.1510 Efforts to accommodate intergovernmental concerns. ( a ) If a state provides a state process recommendation to the Agency through its single point of contact, the Administrator either: ( 1 ) Accepts the recommendation;
( 2 ) Reaches a mutally agreeable solution with the state process; or
( 3 ) Provides the single point of contact with a written explanation of its decision, in such form as the Administrator in his or her discretion deems appropriate. The Administrator may also supplement the written explanation by providing the explanation to the single point of contact by telephone, other telecommunication, or other means.
( b ) In any explanation under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the Administrator informs the single point of contact that: ( 1 ) The Agency will not implement its decision for a least ten days after the single point of contact receives the explanation; or
( 2 ) The Administrator has reviewed the decision and determined that, because of unusual circumstances, the waiting period of at least ten days is not feasible.
( c ) For purposes of computing the waiting period under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a single point of contact is presumed to have received written notification five days after the date of mailing of such notification.
§ 1261.402 Delegation of authority. The following NASA officials are delegated authority, as qualified by § 1261.403, to take such action as is authorized by these regulations to collect, compromise, suspend/terminate collection, and upon consultation with and through legal counsel, to refer the claim (as applicable) to the GAO or Department of Justice: ( a ) For field installations, with regard to subpart 1261.4 and subpart 1261.5: The Director of the Installation or a designee who reports directly to the Installation Director. A copy of such designation, if any, shall be sent to the Director, Financial Management Division, NASA Headquarters.
( b ) For Headquarters, with regard to subpart 1261.4 and subpart 1261.5: The Associate Administrator for Mission Support or a designee who reports directly to the Associate Administrator for Mission Support. A copy of such designation, if any, shall be sent to the Director, Financial Management Division, NASA Headquarters.
( c ) With respect to the analysis required by § 1261.413: The NASA Chief Financial Officer or designee.
( d ) NASA-wide, with regard to subpart 1261.6: The NASA Chief Financial Officer or designee.
( e ) NASA-wide, for complying with pertinent provisions under these regulations for agency hearing or review (see §§ 1261.408(b), 1261.503, and 1261.603(c)): The NASA General Counsel or designee.
[45 FR 48104, July 18, 1980, as amended at 82 FR 29384, June 29, 2017]
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form 10-K") of
Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, Mark A. Wendel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a)   the
Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)   the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

|Date: March 17, 2008 |  | /s/MARK A. WENDELMark A. Wendel Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks