alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3(i)




CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION




TO THE




CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT




OF




GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES,
INC.




General Electric Capital Services,
Inc. (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:




1. The name of the Corporation is
General Electric Capital Services, Inc.




2. A Certificate of Amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed with the Secretary of
State of Delaware on July 22, 1999 and said Certificate requires correction
as permitted by subsection (f) of Section 103 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.




3. The inaccuracy or defect of said
Certificate of Amendment is that it incorrectly sets forth language regarding
the reclassification of the Common Stock of the Corporation in Article FOURTH of
the Certificate of Amendment rather than as part of the text of amended Article
4 of the Certificate of Incorporation as set forth in Article FIRST of the
Certificate of Amendment.




4. Article FIRST of the Certificate
of Amendment is corrected by adding a third sentence to the text quoted in the
resolution set forth in Article FIRST as follows:




“The 101 shares, par value $10,000
per share, of Common Stock, which were authorized and outstanding immediately
prior to the date hereof, are hereby split at the rate of 10 for 1 into 1,010
shares, par value $1,000 per share, of Common Stock issued and outstanding.”




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, General Electric
Capital Services, Inc. has caused this Certificate to be executed this 1st day
of April 2008.








GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL
      SERVICES, INC.By:
            
            /s/ Craig T.
      BeazerName:
            
            Craig T. BeazerTitle:
            
            Vice President, General
      Counsel & Secretary
§ 1204.1003 Procedures. ( a ) All entrances to NASA real property or facilities (including NASA Headquarters, NASA Centers, or Component Facilities) will be conspicuously posted with the following notices: ( 1 ) CONSENT TO INSPECTION: YOUR ENTRY INTO, CONTINUED PRESENCE ON, OR EXIT FROM THIS FACILITY IS CONTINGENT UPON YOUR CONSENT TO INSPECTION OF PERSON AND PROPERTY.
( 2 ) UNAUTHORIZED INTRODUCTION OF WEAPONS OR DANGEROUS MATERIALS IS PROHIBITED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY NASA. YOU MAY NOT CARRY, TRANSPORT, INTRODUCE, STORE, OR USE FIREARMS OR OTHER DANGEROUS WEAPONS, EXPLOSIVES OR OTHER INCENDIARY DEVICES, OR OTHER DANGEROUS INSTRUMENT OR MATERIAL LIKELY TO PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL INJURY OR DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY NASA.
( b ) Only NASA security personnel or members of the facility's uniformed security force will conduct inspections pursuant to this subpart. Such inspections will be conducted in accordance with guidelines established by the Assistant Administrator for Protective Services , NASA Headquarters.
( c ) If an individual does not consent to an inspection, it will not be conducted, but the individual will be denied entry to, or be escorted off the facililty.
( d ) If, during an inspection, an individual is found to be in unauthorized possession of items believed to represent a threat to the safety or security of the facility, the individual will be denied entry to or be escorted off the facility, and appropriate law enforcement authorities will be notified immediately.
( e ) If, during an inspection conducted pursuant to this subpart, an individual is in possession of U.S. Government property without proper authorization, that person will be required to relinquish the property to the security representative pending proper authorization for the possession of the property or its removal from the facility. The individual relinquishing the property will be provided with a receipt for the property.
[65 FR 47663, Aug. 3, 2000, as amended at 78 FR 5126, Jan. 24, 2013]
§ 125.375 Fuel supply: Nonturbine and turbopropeller-powered airplanes. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may release for flight or take off a nonturbine or turbopropeller-powered airplane unless, considering the wind and other weather conditions expected, it has enough fuel— ( 1 ) To fly to and land at the airport to which it is released;
( 2 ) Thereafter, to fly to and land at the most distant alternate airport specified in the flight release; and
( 3 ) Thereafter, to fly for 45 minutes at normal crusing fuel consumption.
( b ) If the airplane is released for any flight other than from one point in the conterminous United States to another point in the conterminous United States, it must carry enough fuel to meet the requirements of paragraphs (a) (1) and (2) of this section and thereafter fly for 30 minutes plus 15 percent of the total time required to fly at normal cruising fuel consumption to the airports specified in paragraphs (a) (1) and (2) of this section, or fly for 90 minutes at normal cruising fuel consumption, whichever is less.
( c ) No person may release a nonturbine or turbopropeller-powered airplane to an airport for which an alternate is not specified under § 125.367(b) unless it has enough fuel, considering wind and other weather conditions expected, to fly to that airport and thereafter to fly for 3 hours at normal cruising fuel consumption.
SCHEDULE 1

LIST OF PROFESSIONALS BY MATTER

Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Commonwealth of PR (Matter ID 101)

Name Title or Position Department, Group, or

Section

Arrastia, John Partner Litigation

Castaldi, Angelo M. Associate Litigation/Bankruptcy

Alvarez, Carlos E. Associate Litigation

Gray, Heather Paralegal Litigation/Bankruptcy

PREPA (Matter ID 102)

Name Title or Position Department, Group, or

Section

Arrastia, John Partner Litigation

Suarez, Jesus M. Partner Bankruptcy

Castaldi, Angelo M. Associate Litigation/Bankruptcy

Alvarez, Carlos E. Associate Litigation

Arellano, Marianne Associate Litigation

ERS (Matter ID 103)

Name Title or Position Department, Group, or

Section

Arrastia, John Partner Litigation

Suarez, Jesus M. Partner Bankruptcy

Castaldi, Angelo M. Associate Litigation/Bankruptcy

Gray, Heather Paralegal Litigation/Bankruptcy

HTA (Matter ID 104)

Name Title or Position Department, Group, or

Section

Arrastia, John Partner Litigation

Castaldi, Angelo M. Associate Litigation/Bankruptcy

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24740-7 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 15:19:47 Desc:

Schedule 1 Page 1 of 1
§ 135.341 Pilot and flight attendant crewmember training programs. ( a ) Each certificate holder, other than one who uses only one pilot in the certificate holder's operations, shall establish and maintain an approved pilot training program, and each certificate holder who uses a flight attendant crewmember shall establish and maintain an approved flight attendant training program, that is appropriate to the operations to which each pilot and flight attendant is to be assigned, and will ensure that they are adequately trained to meet the applicable knowledge and practical testing requirements of §§ 135.293 through 135.301. However, the Administrator may authorize a deviation from this section if the Administrator finds that, because of the limited size and scope of the operation, safety will allow a deviation from these requirements. This deviation authority does not extend to the training provided under § 135.336.
( b ) Each certificate holder required to have a training program by paragraph (a) of this section shall include in that program ground and flight training curriculums for— ( 1 ) Initial training;
( 2 ) Transition training;
( 3 ) Upgrade training;
( 4 ) Differences training; and
( 5 ) Recurrent training.
( c ) Each certificate holder required to have a training program by paragraph (a) of this section shall provide current and appropriate study materials for use by each required pilot and flight attendant.
( d ) The certificate holder shall furnish copies of the pilot and flight attendant crewmember training program, and all changes and additions, to the assigned representative of the Administrator. If the certificate holder uses training facilities of other persons, a copy of those training programs or appropriate portions used for those facilities shall also be furnished. Curricula that follow FAA published curricula may be cited by reference in the copy of the training program furnished to the representative of the Administrator and need not be furnished with the program.
[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-18, 47 FR 33396, Aug. 2, 1982; Amdt. 135-127, 78 FR 42379, July 15, 2013; Amdt. 135-127A, 78 FR 77574, Dec. 24, 2013]
§ 797.19 Review of NCUA records related to the debt. ( a ) An employee who desires to inspect or copy NCUA records related to the employee's debt must send a written request to the Executive Director or the individual designated in the Notice. The letter must be received in the office of that individual within 15 calendar days after the employee's receipt of the Notice.
( b ) In response to a timely request submitted by the employee, the employee shall be notified of the location and time when the employee may inspect and copy records related to the debt. If the employee is unable personally to inspect such records, NCUA shall arrange to send copies of such records to the employee.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3742 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3742

  To designate the United States courthouse and post office building 
  located at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto Rico, as the ``Luis A. 
       Ferre United States Courthouse and Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2004

  Mr. Acevedo-Vila (for himself, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Gutierrez, and Ms. 
  Velazquez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse and post office building 
  located at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto Rico, as the ``Luis A. 
       Ferre United States Courthouse and Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LUIS A. FERRE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE AND POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The United States courthouse and post office 
building located at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto Rico, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Luis A. Ferre United States Courthouse 
and Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper or other record of the United States to the courthouse and post 
office building referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the Luis A. Ferre United States Courthouse and Post Office 
Building.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1203.203 Degree of protection. ( a ) *General.* Upon determination that information or material must be classified, the degree of protection commensurate with the sensitivity of the information must be determined. If there is reasonable doubt about the need to classify information, it shall be safeguarded as if it were classified pending a determination by an original classification authority, who shall make this determination within 30 days. If there is reasonable doubt about the appropriate level of classification, it shall be safeguarded at the higher level of classification pending a determination by an original classification authority, who shall make this determination within 30 days.
( b ) *Authorized categories of classification.* The three categories of classification, as authorized and defined in “the Order,” are set out below. No other restrictive markings are authorized to be placed on NASA classified documents or materials except as expressly provided by statute or by NASA Directives. ( 1 ) *Top Secret.* Top Secret is the designation applied to information or material, the unauthorized disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.
( 2 ) *Secret.* Secret is the designation applied to information or material, the unauthorized disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to the national security.
( 3 ) *Confidential.* Confidential is the designation applied to that information or material for which the unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause damage to the national security.
[44 FR 34913, June 18, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 5890, Feb. 9, 1983; 78 FR 5117, Jan. 24, 2013]
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.1  


 
 

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT    
  


        This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the annual
report on Form 20-F (the "Form 20-F") for the year ended December 31, 2002 of Preem Holdings AB (publ) (the "Issuer"). 


        I,
Karim Karaman, the President of the Issuer, certify that: 



          (i)  the
Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 


        (ii)  the
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer. 



	Dated:	April 30, 2003.	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/  KARIM KARAMAN      
 Name:  Karim Karaman

Title:    President	 





        A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Preem Holdings AB (publ) (the "Company") and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 









QuickLinks


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-25,679-37
IN RE ARTHUR DAV ID LOWE, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1025 IN THE 110 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM BRISCOE COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ o f m an damus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he is assisting his fellow prisoner, Rene R. L eal, to p re p ar e an Article 11.07 application for a writ of habea s corpus. Johnson v. Ave ry , 393 U.S. 4 8 3 (1969). He alleg es that the District Clerk of Br iscoe County has reque sted that rela tor be restric ted from sending or rec eiving any mail to or from the District Clerk, including leg al mail and mail relating to the purcha se of court documents. In re Bonilla , 424 S.W .3d 528, 533 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Relator includes a document purporting to be an internal TDCJ “Ne g ative M ai l ” letter2

informing relator and the mailroom supervisor on his prison unit that “B ena Hester , Br iscoe County and District Clerk has been place d on y our neg ative mailing list at her reque st. You will not be allowed to send or

rec eive mail fr om this i ndividual.” I n th e s e circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of B r is c o e County , is or dere d to f

ile a response addre ssing whether she reque sted that Relator be barr ed from
corr esponding with her office
. I f so, her r esponse should include the rationale for this reque st and include any

supporting doc uments, as nec essar y . Texas Depa

rtment of Criminal J ustice’s Of fice of the Ge nera l Counsel is ordered to file a response to Relator’s claims and its policies applicable to, among other things, “Ne g ative Mail” and leg al mail. Such response s shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order. Copies of this opinion s hall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Of fice of Gene ral Counsel, and Rene Ramiro L eal, TD CJ #00754733.

Filed: Jul y

24, 2019 Do not publish
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60297

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAMES VAUGHN RANKIN

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:04-CR-186-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Vaughn Rankin appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for

an extension of time to file an appeal under FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(4). He argues

that the district court abused its discretion when denying his motion. Although

the district court determined that Rankin failed to establish both good cause and

excusable neglect for an extension, on appeal Rankin relies solely upon the good

cause requirement of Rule 4(b)(4). He argues that he changed his mind about

appealing within the time permitted by Rule 4(b)(4), his appeal is nonfrivolous,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 3, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60297

2

and he could not focus on the decision to appeal because, after the judgment was

entered, he was transferred to a different facility.

“Rule 4 provides limited recourse for defendants who miss the filing

deadline by permitting the district court, upon finding good cause or excusable

neglect, to extend the time to file a notice of appeal for up to 30 days from the

expiration of the time otherwise prescribed.” See United States v. Plascencia,

537 F.3d 385, 388 (5th Cir. 2008). Rule 4 is an inflexible claims processing rule

that the district court may strictly enforce. See id. at 389, n.14. The district

court did not abuse its discretion by determining that Rankin failed to establish

good cause that warranted an extension of time under Rule 4(b)(4). See Rule

4(b)(4); United States v. Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 846 (5th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
1The Hon. Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota, sitting by designation.

2The Hon. Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District of

South Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 00-2715SD

_____________

United States of America, *

* On Appeal from the United

Appellee, * States District Court

* for the District of

v. * South Dakota.

*

Monica Anne White, * [Not To Be Published]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 15, 2001

 Filed: March 1, 2001

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS,1 District

Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Monica Anne White appeals her mandatory minimum sentence imposed by the

District Court2 pursuant to a conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and possession with the intent to distribute
-2-

methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Ms. White claims the Court

erred in imposing sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) rather than § 841(b)(1)(C).

We affirm.

Ms. White argues that drug quantities triggering § 841(b)(1)(B) are elements of

the statutory offense because this provision imposes a mandatory minimum sentence.

Therefore, she says, the indictment must have specified drug quantity and the

government must have proved that quantity to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt.

Since the quantity of methamphetamine involved in the charge here was not alleged in

the indictment or proved to the jury, she argues that she should have been sentenced

under § 841(b)(1)(C), which has no mandatory minimum. We disagree.

We have held that where a defendant is sentenced within the statutory range of

the basic crime for which she was convicted, drug quantity does not have to appear in

the indictment or be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v.

Aguayo-Delgado, 220 F.3d 926 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 600 (2000). Here,

Ms. White's sentence of 60 months (5 years) imprisonment is within the statutory range

of 0 to 20 years provided by § 841(b)(1)(C), which does not reference a specific drug

quantity for methamphetamine. Thus, there was no error in Ms. White's sentence.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Attachment 41Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:24634-41   Filed:06/22/23   Entered:06/22/23 18:57:29    Desc: Attachment 41   Page 1 of 3

Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:24634-41   Filed:06/22/23   Entered:06/22/23 18:57:29    Desc: Attachment 41   Page 2 of 3

Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:24634-41   Filed:06/22/23   Entered:06/22/23 18:57:29    Desc: Attachment 41   Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Corvis Corporation:

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-47104) on Form S-8 of Corvis Corporation of our reports dated January
29, 2002, except as to Note 14 which is as of February 25, 2002, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Corvis Corporation as of December 30, 2000 and
December 29, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended January 1,
2000, December 30, 2000 and December 29, 2001, and the related financial
statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 29, 2001 annual report
on Form 10-K of Corvis Corporation.

                                                        /s/ KPMG LLP


McLean, Virginia
March 19, 2002

                                       91
#### § 761.1 Cross reference.

The rules formerly at 12 CFR part 761 have been republished by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau at 12 CFR part 1007, “S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act—Federal Registration of Residential Mortgage Loan Originators (Regulation G)”.
Exhibit 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wesley D. Tate, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                   Date: August 20, 2010

                                   \s\ Wesley D. Tate
                                   ------------------
                                   Wesley D. Tate
                                   Chief Financial Officer