alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________
No. 23

- 1131

___________________________

Kaleb Leon Gilpin

Petitioner - Appellant

v.

United States of America

Respondent - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Central

____________

Submitted: April 18, 2024 Filed: May 2, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

In September 2021, Kaleb Gilpin pleaded guilty to two counts of being a user of a controlled substance in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3 ). The
district court 1 sentenced Gilpin to 32 months’ imprisonment on each count , to be

1 The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.-2- served concurrently, followed by a 3

- year term of supervised release. In June 2022, the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen , 597 U.S. 1 (2022)

. The Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to carry a handgun for self

- defense outside the home. Id. at 10. After the Court
issued its decision in Bruen
, Gilpin filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . He argued that his conviction violated the
Seco nd Amendment and that his counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the constitutionality of § 922(g)(3)

. The district court denied Gilpin’s motion.

We granted a certificate of appealability solely on the issue of whether Gilpin’s conviction violate s the Second Amendment in light of Bruen

. See id. § 2253(c)

. In § 2255 proceeding s , we review a district court’s conclusions on issues
of law de novo

. United States v. Duke , 50 F.3d 571, 576 (8th Cir. 1995). The constitutionality of § 922(g)(3) is a legal question subject to de novo review. See id.

Due to our decision in United States v. Veasley

, --- F.4th

---- , 2024 WL 1649267 (8th Cir. Apr. 17, 2024), we discern no error by the district court. 2 In Veasley

, which was decided after Bruen
, we rejected the defendant’s facial challenge

to § 922(g)(3 ) under the Second Amendment. Id. at *9. We held that

, for purposes of a facial challenge, § 922(g)(3 ) fit s within the historical tradition of firearm regulation. Id. Therefore, we reject Gilpin’s facial challenge as foreclosed by Veasley

.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court

.

______________________________

2 This case was originally set for oral argument on December 12, 2023. In November 2023, we granted the Government’s unopposed motion to stay the case pending this court’s decision in Veasley . An opinion and judgment in Veasley were filed on April 17, 2024.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, John Hanna, Chief Executive Officer of The Fashion House Holdings, Inc., (the “Company”),certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Fashion House Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     *Date:November 17, 2006* */s/ John Hanna*    *By: John Hanna*    *Chief Executive Officer*  
39
AMERICAN AIRLINES 

October 1, 2010 

Paul L. Gretch 

Director 

Office of International Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

 Re: American Airlines, Chicago-Beijing/Shanghai 

 Frequencies (DOT-OST-2004-19077 and 2007-28567)

Dear Mr. Gretch: 

 By Notice of Action Taken in the captioned dockets on 

September 29, 2010, the Department granted our motion of August 

23, 2010 seeking flexibility to operate two Chicago-Beijing 

frequencies and two Chicago-Shanghai frequencies on a seasonal 

basis. American requested such relief to have the same flexibility enjoyed by Continental Airlines and Delta Air Lines. 

 In the “Conditions” in the NOAT, the Department stated 

that “[s]hould American determine that it will resume year-round 

operations with the two Chicago-Beijing frequencies and two 

Chicago-Shanghai frequencies, the carrier must notify the 

Department” (p. 2). 

 By directing American to provide notice should yearround operations “resume,” the Department is suggesting that we 

are not now using all of our frequencies. However, American is 

currently operating daily nonstop service between Chicago and 

both Beijing and Shanghai. Our motion asked for flexibility to 

adjust service on a seasonal basis in the future. The Department stated that “[b]y our action here, American and Delta would 

have the flexibility to use the frequencies at issue here for 

seasonal service” (p. 2). Accordingly, if we later decide to 

operate the subject frequencies seasonally, the NOAT authorizes 

us to do so. 
- 2 – 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 Carl B. Nelson 

 Associate General Counsel 

 American Airlines, Inc. 

 1101 17th Street, N.W. 

 Suite 600 

 Washington, D.C. 20036 

 (202) 496-5647 

 carl.nelson@aa.com 

cc: Docket Branch 

 Esta Rosenberg 

 Thuy Cooper 

 Service list 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

 I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing 

document by email on the following persons: 

 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dlalaw.com 

scott.mcclain@delta.com bill@mietuslaw.com 

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com 

kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

bkeiner@crowell.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com 

mrosia@crowell.com mcmillin@woa.com 

bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com eskraft@jamhoff.com 

jeffrey.manley@united.com dpdean@jamhoff.com 

bob.kneisley@wnco.com dkirstein@yklaw.com 

robert.land@jetblue.com jyoung@yklaw.com 

msinick@ssd.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov 

cdonley@ssd.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil 

gbleopard@fedex.com john.allen@faa.gov 

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com byerlyjr@state.gov 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com recohn@hhlaw.com 

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com 

lhalloway@crowell.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com 

efaberman@wileyrein.com lachter@starpower.net 

mroller@rollerbauer.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com rpommer@atlasair.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com gmurphy@crowell.com 

sophy.chen@hklaw.com russell.bailey@alpa.org 

david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com esahr@eckertseamons.com 

 

 

 _______________________________ 

 CARL B. NELSON 

October 1, 2010
§ 125.209 Emergency equipment: Extended overwater operations. ( a ) No person may operate an airplane in extended overwater operations unless it carries, installed in conspicuously marked locations easily accessible to the occupants if a ditching occurs, the following equipment: ( 1 ) An approved life preserver equipped with an approved survivor locator light, or an approved flotation means, for each occupant of the aircraft. The life preserver or other flotation means must be easily accessible to each seated occupant. If a flotation means other than a life preserver is used, it must be readily removable from the airplane.
( 2 ) Enough approved life rafts (with proper buoyancy) to carry all occupants of the airplane, and at least the following equipment for each raft clearly marked for easy identification— ( i ) One canopy (for sail, sunshade, or rain catcher);
( ii ) One radar reflector (or similar device);
( iii ) One life raft repair kit;
( iv ) One bailing bucket;
( v ) One signaling mirror;
( vi ) One police whistle;
( vii ) One raft knife;
( viii ) One CO2 bottle for emergency inflation;
( ix ) One inflation pump;
( x ) Two oars;
( xi ) One 75-foot retaining line;
( xii ) One magnetic compass;
( xiii ) One dye marker;
( xiv ) One flashlight having at least two size “D” cells or equivalent;
( xv ) At least one approved pyrotechnic signaling device;
( xvi ) A 2-day supply of emergency food rations supplying at least 1,000 calories a day for each person;
( xvii ) One sea water desalting kit for each two persons that raft is rated to carry, or two pints of water for each person the raft is rated to carry;
( xviii ) One fishing kit; and
( xix ) One book on survival appropriate for the area in which the airplane is operated.
( b ) No person may operate an airplane in extended overwater operations unless there is attached to one of the life rafts required by paragraph (a) of this section, an approved survival type emergency locator transmitter. Batteries used in this transmitter must be replaced (or recharged, if the batteries are rechargeable) when the transmitter has been in use for more than one cumulative hour, or, when 50 percent of their useful life (or for rechargeable batteries, 50 percent of their useful life of charge) has expired, as established by the transmitter manufacturer under its approval. The new expiration date for replacing (or recharging) the battery must be legibly marked on the outside of the transmitter. The battery useful life (or useful life of charge) requirements of this paragraph do not apply to batteries (such as water-activated batteries) that are essentially unaffected during probable storage intervals.
[Doc. No. 19779, 45 FR 67235, Oct. 9, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 125-20, 59 FR 32058, June 21, 1994]
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.11 What is a final rule with request for comments?

A final rule with request for comment is a rule that the FAA issues in final (with an effective date) that invites public comment on the rule. We usually do this when we have not first issued an ANPRM or NPRM, because we have found that doing so would be impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. We give our reasons for our determination in the preamble. The comment period often ends after the effective date of the rule. A final rule not preceded by an ANPRM or NPRM is commonly called an “immediately adopted final rule.” We invite comments on these rules only if we think that we will receive useful information. For example, we would not invite comments when we are just making an editorial clarification or correction.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 24983)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 7, 1999, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the Integrated Shipbuilding Environment Consortium (“ISEC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are Electric Boat Corporation, Groton, CT; Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL; Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, Newport News, VA; NIIP, Inc., Stamford, CT; and NNS Research Inc, Newport News, VA. The nature and objectives of the venture are the development of industry software protocols that will integrate electronic business environments across the U.S. shipbuilding industry.                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-10594  Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of RMS Titanic,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 8, 2002 (the "Report"),  I, Gerald Couture, Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Gerald Couture
-------------------------
Gerald Couture
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1230.112 Review by Institution

Research covered by this policy that has been approved by an IRB may be subject to further appropriate review and approval or disapproval by officials of the institution. However, those officials may not approve the research if it has not been approved by an IRB.
#### § 125.165 Extinguishing agent container pressure relief.

Extinguishing agent containers must be provided with a pressure relief to prevent bursting of the container because of excessive internal pressures. The discharge line from the relief connection must terminate outside the airplane in a place convenient for inspection on the ground. An indicator must be provided at the discharge end of the line to provide a visual indication when the container has discharged.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 93]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 129 STAT. 1310]]

Public Law 114-93
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To suspend the current compensation packages for the chief executive 
         officers of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and for other 
             purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 25, 2015 -  [S. 2036]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Equity in 
Government Compensation Act of 2015. 12 USC 4518 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equity in Government Compensation Act 
of 2015''.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Director.--The term ``Director'' means the Director of 
        the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
            (2) Enterprise.--The term ``enterprise'' means--
                    (A) the Federal National Mortgage Association and 
                any affiliate thereof; and
                    (B) the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and 
                any affiliate thereof.
SEC. 3. REASONABLE PAY FOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

    (a) Suspension of Current Compensation Package and Limitation.--The 
Director shall suspend the compensation packages approved for 2015 for 
the chief executive officers of each enterprise and, in lieu of such 
packages, subject to the limitation under subsection (b), establish the 
compensation and benefits for each such chief executive officer at the 
same level in effect for such officer as of January 1, 2015, and such 
compensation and benefits may not thereafter be increased.
    (b) Limitation on Bonuses.--Subsection (a) shall not be construed to 
affect the applicability of section 16 of the STOCK Act (12 U.S.C. 
4518a) to the chief executive officer of each enterprise.
    (c) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall only apply to a chief 
executive officer of an enterprise if the enterprise is in 
conservatorship or receivership pursuant to section 1367 of the Federal 
Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 
U.S.C. 4617).

[[Page 129 STAT. 1311]]

SEC. 4. <<NOTE: 12 USC 4518 note.>>  FANNIE AND FREDDIE CHIEF 
                    EXECUTIVE OFFICERS NOT FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.

    Any chief executive officer affected by any provision under section 
3 shall not be considered a Federal employee.

    Approved November 25, 2015.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2036 (H.R. 2243):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114-
339, Pt. 1 (Comm. on Financial Services) accompanying H.R. 2243.
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015):
            Sept. 15, considered and passed Senate.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
§ 1253.445 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *Status generally.* A recipient shall not apply any rule concerning a student's actual or potential parental, family, or marital status that treats students differently on the basis of sex.
( b ) *Pregnancy and related conditions.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not discriminate against any student, or exclude any student from its education program or activity, including any class or extracurricular activity, on the basis of such student's pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, unless the student requests voluntarily to participate in a separate portion of the program or activity of the recipient.
( 2 ) A recipient may require such a student to obtain the certification of a physician that the student is physically and emotionally able to continue participation as long as such a certification is required of all students for other physical or emotional conditions requiring the attention of a physician.
( 3 ) A recipient that operates a portion of its education program or activity separately for pregnant students, admittance to which is completely voluntary on the part of the student as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, shall ensure that the separate portion is comparable to that offered to non-pregnant students.
( 4 ) Subject to § 1253.235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy and recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability with respect to any medical or hospital benefit, service, plan, or policy that such recipient administers, operates, offers, or participates in with respect to students admitted to the recipient's educational program or activity.
( 5 ) In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its students, or in the case of a student who does not otherwise qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence for as long a period of time as is deemed medically necessary by the student's physician, at the conclusion of which the student shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began.
§ 1245.105 Waiver after reporting inventions. ( a ) The provisions of this section apply to petitions for waiver of domestic rights to identified inventions which have been reported to NASA and to which a waiver of rights has not been granted pursuant to § 1245.104.
( b ) ( 1 ) When an individual identified invention has been reported to NASA under the applicable terms of the contract and waiver of rights has not been granted under § 1245.104, the Board normally will recommend grant of a request for waiver of domestic rights to such invention if the request is received within 8 months of first disclosure to NASA (or such longer period that the Board may permit for good cause shown), unless the Board finds that one or more of the situations set forth in § 1245.104(b)(3)(i) through (v) exist. When granted, the waiver will be subject to the reservations set forth in § 1245.107 in the same manner as discussed in § 1245.104(c)(1).
( 2 ) The waiver shall extend to the invention claimed in the patent application filed on the reported invention, including any subsequent divisional or continuation application thereof, provided the claims of the subsequent application do not substantially change the scope of the reported invention.