alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4010 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to make permanent 

the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue 

priority review vouchers to encourage treatments for rare pediatric diseases. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2020 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

make permanent the authority of the Secretary of Health 

and Human Services to issue priority review vouchers 

to encourage treatments for rare pediatric diseases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Creating Hope Reau5 thorization Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4010 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROVIDING FOR PERMANENT AUTHORITY TO ISSUE 

2 PRIORITY REVIEW VOUCHERS TO ENCOUR3 AGE TREATMENTS FOR RARE PEDIATRIC DIS4 EASES. 

5 Section 529(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos6 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 360ff(b)) is amended by striking 

7 paragraph (5). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10(a)

                         Independent Auditors' Consent

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Mutual of America Institutional Funds, Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated February 20, 2003 with respect to
Mutual of America Institutional Funds, Inc. (comprised of: All America Fund,
Equity Index Fund, Mid-Cap Equity Index Fund, Aggressive Equity Fund, Bond Fund
and Money Market Fund) incorporated herein by reference and to the references to
our firm under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus and
"Independent Auditors" in the Statement of Additional Information.

KPMG LLP

New York, New York
April 25, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

IN RE: No. 08

- 15

- 00161

- CR

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Relator. §

§

§ AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDI NG

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against

the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 243rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas, and

concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be dismisse d as moot. We therefore

dismiss as moot the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2017.

ANN CRAWFOR D McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J., not participating
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24355-1 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/30/23 12:18:05 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
§ 142.49 Training center instructor and evaluator privileges and limitations. ( a ) A certificate holder may allow an instructor to provide: ( 1 ) Instruction for each curriculum for which that instructor is qualified.
( 2 ) Testing and checking for which that instructor is qualified.
( 3 ) Instruction, testing, and checking intended to satisfy the requirements of any part of this chapter.
( b ) A training center whose instructor or evaluator is designated in accordance with the requirements of this subpart to conduct training, testing, or checking in qualified and approved flight training equipment, may allow its instructor or evaluator to give endorsements required by part 61 of this chapter if that instructor or evaluator is authorized by the Administrator to instruct or evaluate in a part 142 curriculum that requires such endorsements.
( c ) A training center may not allow an instructor to— ( 1 ) Excluding briefings and debriefings, conduct more than 8 hours of instruction in any 24-consecutive-hour period;
( 2 ) Provide flight training equipment instruction unless that instructor meets the requirements of § 142.53 (a)(1) through (a)(4), and § 142.53(b), as applicable; or
( 3 ) Provide flight instruction in an aircraft unless that instructor— ( i ) Meets the requirements of § 142.53(a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(5);
( ii ) Is qualified and authorized in accordance with subpart H of part 61 of this chapter;
( iii ) Holds certificates and ratings specified by part 61 of this chapter appropriate to the category, class, and type aircraft in which instructing;
( iv ) If instructing or evaluating in an aircraft in flight while serving as a required crewmember, holds at least a valid second class medical certificate; and
( v ) Meets the recency of experience requirements of part 61 of this chapter.
[Doc. No. 26933, 61 FR 34562, July 2, 1996, as amended by Amdt. 142-2, 62 FR 68137, Dec. 30, 1997; Amdt. 142-9, 78 FR 42380, July 15, 2013]
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of
Premier Exhibitions, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended November 30, 2008, Arnie Geller, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, and Harold Ingalls, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each certifies, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: January 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Arnie Geller                               
|                       |  | Arnie Geller                                   
|                       |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                  
|                       | 
|Dated: January 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Harold W. Ingalls                          
|                       |  | Harold W. Ingalls                              
|                       |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     
|                       |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 139
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

§ 139.301 Records. In a manner authorized by the Administrator, each certificate holder must— ( a ) Furnish upon request by the Administrator all records required to be maintained under this part.
( b ) Maintain records required under this part as follows: ( 1 ) *Personnel training.* Twenty-four consecutive calendar months for personnel training records and orientation materials, as required under §§ 139.303, 139.327, and 139.402(d).
( 2 ) *Emergency personnel training.* Twenty-four consecutive calendar months for aircraft rescue and firefighting and emergency medical service personnel training records, as required under § 139.319.
( 3 ) *Airport fueling agent inspection.* Twelve consecutive calendar months for records of inspection of airport fueling agents, as required under § 139.321.
( 4 ) *Fueling personnel training.* Twelve consecutive calendar months for training records of fueling personnel, as required under § 139.321.
( 5 ) *Self-inspection.* Twelve consecutive calendar months for self-inspection records, as required under § 139.327.
( 6 ) *Movement areas and safety areas training.* Twenty-four consecutive calendar months for records of training given to pedestrians and ground vehicle operators with access to movement areas and safety areas, as required under § 139.329.
( 7 ) *Accident and incident.* Twelve consecutive calendar months for each accident or incident in movement areas and safety areas involving an air carrier aircraft and/or ground vehicle, as required under § 139.329.
( 8 ) *Airport condition.* Twelve consecutive calendar months for records of airport condition information dissemination, as required under § 139.339.
( 9 ) *Safety risk management documentation.* The longer of thirty-six consecutive calendar months after the risk analysis of identified hazards under § 139.402(b)(2) has been completed, or twelve consecutive calendar months after mitigations required under § 139.402(b)(2)(v) have been completed.
( 10 ) *Safety communications.* Twelve consecutive calendar months for safety communications, as required under § 139.402(d).
( c ) Make and maintain any additional records required by the Administrator, this part, and the Airport Certification Manual.
[Docket No. FAA-2000-7479, 69 FR 6424, Feb. 10, 2004, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2010-0997;Amdt. No. 139-28, 88 FR 11672, Feb. 23, 2023]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2012 (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Ryan, Chief Executive Officer, President,
Secretary and General Counsel of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)      The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)      The information contained
in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|September 13, 2012 | /s/Christopher J. Ryan                          
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------------
|                   | Christopher J. Ryan                             
|                   | Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive
Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/S/    LEO F. WELLS, III
|Leo F. Wells, III       
|Chief Executive Officer 
|May 10, 2004            

|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/S/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Executive Officer   
|May 10, 2004
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLICACCOUNTANTS**
     We have issued our report dated June 7, 2004(except for Note 16, as to which the date is June 18,2004), accompanying the consolidated financial statements andschedule included in the Annual Report of MTI TechnologyCorporation and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the yearended April 3, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference of said report in the Registration Statements ofMTI Technology Corporation on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-109060,333-103065, 333-85410, 333-76972, 333-69030, 333-66716,333-95915, 333-92623, 333-85579, 333-61957, 333-46363,333-50377, 333-18501, 33-75180 and 33-80438) and Form S-3(No. 333-85410).
 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP    
Irvine, CaliforniaJune 7, 2004 (except for Note 16,as to which the date is June 18, 2004)
#### § 359.3 Prohibited indemnification payments.

No insured depository institution or depository institution holding company shall make or agree to make any prohibited indemnification payment, except as provided in this part.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **§
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of
        the
        Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
        the period ending July 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Ryan, Chief
        Executive Officer, President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  /s/Christopher
        J. Ryan
 Christopher
        J. Ryan
 Chief
        Executive Officer, President, Secretary
 and
        General Counsel
 
 September
        7, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7026

RODNEY A. KOON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; BRIAN K. WELLS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-ct-03301-FL)

Submitted: December 18, 2018 Decided: December 21, 2018

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney A. Koon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rodney A. Koon seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his civil complaint in part as moot and in part for failure to state a claim, and a 

subsequent order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and 

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because 

Koon may remedy the identified deficiencies in his initial complaint through the filing of 

an amended complaint, we conclude that the dismissal of his complaint without prejudice 

is neither a final nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Goode v. Cent. Va. 

Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar 

Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to 

the district court with instructions to allow Koon to file an amended complaint.

*

 We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED

 * Although the district court denied Koon’s motion to amend on the ground that 

his proposed amendment would be futile, the court left open the possibility that Koon 

could allege sufficient facts in support of his request for compensatory damages.
Revised MATS RIA ES 

 12/16/2011 01:26 PM 

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

0_Executive SummaryMATS_1216_v2.doc
#### § 121.567 Instrument approach procedures and IFR landing minimums.

No person may make an instrument approach at an airport except in accordance with IFR weather minimums and instrument approach procedures set forth in the certificate holder's operations specifications.
#### § 135.241 Applicability.

Except as provided in § 135.3, this subpart prescribes the flight crewmember requirements for operations under this part.

[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 121-250, 60 FR 65950, Dec. 20, 1995]
#### § 135.141 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes aircraft and equipment requirements for operations under this part. The requirements of this subpart are in addition to the aircraft and equipment requirements of part 91 of this chapter. However, this part does not require the duplication of any equipment required by this chapter.
#### § 1250.103-1 General.

No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program to which this part applies.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1467** 

DOREEN SHING , Plaintiff

- Appellant , and
MAY SHING , Plaintiff,

v. MD DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ADMINISTRATION; MD DEPT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE , Defendants

- Appellees
. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 00683

- RDB )

Submitted : January 9, 2017 Decided: January 1 9, 2017

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Doreen Shing , Appellant Pro Se. William G. Dunlap , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

U npublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
D oreen and May Shing (“the Shings”) seek to appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

. This cour t may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). Because it is possible that the Shings could cure the defects in their complaint through amendment, t he order they seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent
. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y , 807 F.3d 619 , 623

- 25 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we deny as moot Appellees’ motion to submit on the briefs, dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction , and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow the Shings to file an amended complaint. We dispen se with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED AND REMANDED
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3876 

To make a technical correction relating to the treatment of refunds of merchandise processing fees under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2020 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To make a technical correction relating to the treatment 

of refunds of merchandise processing fees under the 

United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION RELATING TO RE4 FUNDS OF MERCHANDISE PROCESSING FEES. 

5 (a) RELIQUIDATION OF ENTRIES.—Section 205(a)(1) 

6 of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Imple7 mentation Act (Public Law 116–113) is amended by strik8 ing subparagraph (C) and inserting the following: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3876 IS

1 ‘‘(C) by striking ‘for which’ and inserting 

2 ‘, or section 202 of the United States-Mexico3 Canada Agreement Implementation Act, for 

4 which’; and’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact7 ment of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Im8 plementation Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 111.205 Reporting requirements. ( a ) Each reporting entity must provide the information required in paragraph (b) of this section for any individual employed as a pilot beginning on the PRD date of hire for that individual.
( b ) Each reporting entity must report the following records to the PRD for each individual employed as a pilot: ( 1 ) All records described in §§ 111.220 through 111.240 generated on or after June 10, 2022;
( 2 ) The PRD date of hire.
( c ) No person may enter or cause to be entered into the PRD any information described in § 111.245.
[Doc. No. FAA-2020-0246, Amdt. No. 111-1, 86 FR 31060, 31067, June 10, 2021]
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation (the “registrant”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (a) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (a) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)     The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)     The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

 

 

/s/ Ronald E. Klingle

 

Ronald E. Klingle

Chief Executive Officer 

August 31, 2017