alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,413,870               1,413,870
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,048,380              25,048,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,714,146               5,714,146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,962,916              35,962,916
<PP&E>                                       3,956,681               3,956,681
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,195,513                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,543,879              65,543,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,176,906              36,176,906
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       237,292                 237,292
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,262,744              27,262,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,543,879              65,543,879
<SALES>                                     95,127,918              33,208,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            95,127,918              33,208,789
<CGS>                                       56,653,723              20,164,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               95,879,364              34,692,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,920,279                 606,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             564,271                 171,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (8,139,498)             (2,256,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,972                  60,040
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (8,183,470)             (2,316,120)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (8,183,470)             (2,316,120)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.35)                   (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.35)                   (.10)


</TABLE>
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-26 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-26 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 2
Last updated on Tuesday, January 25, 2011.

National Estuaries Program

http://w ater.epa.gov/type/oceb/nep/fund.cfm

You are here: Water Our Waters Oceans, Coasts, Estuaries & Beaches National Estuaries Program Sustainable Financing Strategies

Sustainable Financing Strategies

On average, the National Estuary Programs (NEPs) raise $15 for every $1 provided by EPA. The NEPs successfully leverage federal seed money by:

Developing finance plans

Building strategic alliances

Demonstrating environmental results

Providing seed money or staff to initiate and develop new funding sources such as stormwater utilities.

Over the 2003-2010 period the NEPs leveraged nearly $2.3 billion from $160 million in EPA grants. This additional funding came from a variety of federal, state, local and

private sources through such mechanisms as annual membership appeals, license plate revenues, fines and penalties, State appropriations and intergovernmental

agreements. There are many sustainable funding examples from the NEPs.

The NEPs use leveraged resources to protect and restore important habitat, support critical land acquisitions, upgrade wastewater and stormwater infrastructure, conduct

outreach and education, and implement other priority actions contained in their Comprehensive Conservation Management Plans.

Note: Leveraged dollars are defined as the dollar value (cash or in-kind equivalent) of resources dedicated to implementing an NEP CCMP above and beyond the funding

provided to the NEP under Section 320, including earmark funding. "Primary” leveraging indicates that the NEP Director and staff, rather than NEP partners, played the

central or leadership role in obtaining the additional resources.

Share

3/15/2011 Sustainable Financing Strategies | Nat...

water.epa.gov/type/oceb/nep/fund.cfm 1/1
24285100.BUSINESS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

______________________________________________

In re: )

) PROMESA

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND ) Title III

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, )

)

as representative of )

)

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., ) No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

) (Jointly Administered)

Debtors. )

In re: )

) PROMESA

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND ) Title III

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, )

)

as representative of )

)

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, ) No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

)

PUERTO RICO HIGHWAYS & ) No. 17 BK 3567-LTS

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, ) (This Filing Relates to

) These Debtors)

Debtor. )

PEAJE INVESTMENTS LLC’S INFORMATIVE MOTION AND NOTICE OF

REQUEST TO BE HEARD AT THE FEBRUARY 7-8, 2018 OMNIBUS HEARING

The undersigned, counsel to Peaje Investments LLC (“Peaje”), the plaintiff in Adv. Proc.

Nos. 17-BK-151-LTS and 17-BK-152-LTS and a party-in-interest in the above-captioned Title

III cases, hereby submits this Informative Motion in response to the Court’s January 17 Order

(see Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS, [Dkt. No. 2258]) (the “Order”) concerning attendance at the

February 7-8 Omnibus Hearing (the “Hearing”).

Pursuant to the Order, the undersigned counsel hereby informs the Court that Dora L.

Monserrate Peñagarícano and Richard J. Schell of the firm Monserrate Simonet & Gierbolini,

LLC will attend the Hearing in the San Juan courtroom. In addition, Allan S. Brilliant and/or G.

Eric Brunstad, Jr. and/or Robert J. Jossen of Dechert LLP will attend the Hearing in the New

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2353 Filed:02/02/18 Entered:02/02/18 10:30:20 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2

York courtroom. Counsel reserve the right to appear and present argument at the Hearing with

respect to any agenda item and respond as necessary to any statements made by any party which

implicate Peaje’s interests.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this 2nd day of February, 2018.

MONSERRATE SIMONET &

GIERBOLINI, LLC

Dora L. Monserrate Peñagarícano

USDC-PR No. 212612

101 San Patricio Avenue

Maramar Plaza, Suite 1120

Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968

Phone: (787) 620-5300

Fax: (787) 620-5305

DECHERT LLP

/s/ Andrew C. Harmeyer _

Allan S. Brilliant (pro hac vice)

Robert J. Jossen (pro hac vice)

G. Eric Brunstad, Jr. (pro hac vice)

Andrew C. Harmeyer (pro hac vice)

1095 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10036

-andMichael S. Doluisio (pro hac vice)

Stuart T. Steinberg (pro hac vice)

Cira Centre

2929 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Attorneys for Peaje Investments LLC

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2353 Filed:02/02/18 Entered:02/02/18 10:30:20 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 2nd day of February 2018, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System, which will send notification to

all counsel of record of such filing.

Dated: February 2, 2018

/s/ Brett Stone _

By: Brett Stone

Title: Paralegal, Dechert LLP

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2353 Filed:02/02/18 Entered:02/02/18 10:30:20 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2-Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
             906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act.






               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing of Australian-Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Robert Kamon, the Chief Financial Officer of the  Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350), that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of
       operations of the Company.


Dated:   April 14, 2004



 /s/ ROBERT KAMON
---------------------------
Robert Kamon
Chief Financial Officer








                            Exhibit 32.2
EXHIBIT 32. -     Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                  Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
                  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Australian-Canadian Oil
Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Bernard
Lipton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


Dated: September 22, 2008           /s/ Andre Sakhai
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Andre Sakhai, President &
                                    Chief Executive Officer



Dated: September 22, 2008           /s/ Bernard Lipton
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Bernard Lipton, Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3869 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the expansion of 

the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps, to expand the Cyber Institutes Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2020 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the 

expansion of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training 

Corps, to expand the Cyber Institutes Program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘JROTC and ROTC 

5 Enhancement Act of 2020’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3869 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS’ TRAIN2 ING CORPS PROGRAM. 

3 (a) EXPANSION OF JROTC CURRICULUM.—Section 

4 2031(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

5 by inserting after ‘‘service to the United States’’ the fol6 lowing: ‘‘(including an introduction to service opportuni7 ties in military, national, and public service)’’. 

8 (b) PLAN TO INCREASE NUMBER OF JROTC 

9 UNITS.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation 

10 with the Secretaries of the military departments, develop 

11 and implement a plan to establish and support not fewer 

12 than 6,000 units of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training 

13 Corps by September 30, 2031. 

14 SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF CYBER INSTITUTES PROGRAM. 

15 Section 1640 of the John S. McCain National De16 fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 

17 115–232; 132 Stat. 2310; 10 U.S.C. 2200 note) is amend18 ed by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(g) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than Sep20 tember 30, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

21 to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

22 the House of Representatives a report on the effectiveness 

23 of the Cyber Institutes and on opportunities to expand the 

24 Cyber Institutes to additional select institutions of higher 

25 learning that have a Reserve Officers’ Training Corps pro26 gram. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3869 IS

1 ‘‘(h) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR EXPANSION.— 

2 Amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Depart3 ment of Defense and available for the Cyber Institutes 

4 program under this section shall be available for the ex5 pansion of the program in accordance with the report re6 quired by subsection (g) after September 30, 2021.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 121.432 General. ( a ) Except in the case of operating experience under § 121.434 and ground training for mentoring required by §§ 121.419, 121.420, 121.427, and 121.429, as applicable, a pilot who serves as second in command of an operation that requires three or more pilots must be fully qualified to act as pilot in command of that operation.
( b ) No certificate holder may conduct a check or any training in operations under this part, except for the following checks and training required by this part or the certificate holder: ( 1 ) Line checks for pilots.
( 2 ) Flight engineer checks (except for emergency procedures), if the person being checked is qualified and current in accordance with § 121.453(a).
( 3 ) Flight attendant training and competence checks.
( c ) Except for pilot line checks and flight engineer flight checks, the person being trained or checked may not be used as a required crewmember.
[Doc. No. 9509, 35 FR 95, Jan. 3, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 121-130, 41 FR 47229, Oct. 28, 1976; Amdt. 121-366, 78 FR 67840, Nov. 12, 2013; Amdt. 121-382, 85 FR 10925, Feb. 25, 2020]
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3731 

AN ACT 

To amend title VII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a single point of contact at the Social Security Administration for individuals who are victims of identity 

theft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3731 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Social Secu3 rity’s Service to Victims of Identity Theft Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT FOR IDENTITY THEFT 

5 VICTIMS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title VII of the Social Security 

7 Act (42 U.S.C. 901 et seq.) is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 714. SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT FOR IDENTITY 

10 THEFT VICTIMS. 

11 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of Social Se12 curity shall establish and implement procedures to ensure 

13 that any individual whose social security account number 

14 has been misused (such as to fraudulently obtain benefits 

15 under title II, VIII, or XVI of this Act, or in a manner 

16 that affects an individual’s records at the Social Security 

17 Administration, or in a manner that prompts the indi18 vidual to request a new social security account number) 

19 has a single point of contact at the Social Security Admin20 istration throughout the resolution of the individual’s case. 

21 The single point of contact shall track the individual’s case 

22 to completion and coordinate with other units to resolve 

23 issues as quickly as possible. 

24 ‘‘(b) SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT.— 
3 

†S 3731 ES

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of subsection 

2 (a), the single point of contact shall consist of a 

3 team or subset of specially trained employees who— 

4 ‘‘(A) have the ability to coordinate with 

5 other units to resolve the issues involved in the 

6 individual’s case, and 

7 ‘‘(B) shall be accountable for the case until 

8 its resolution. 

9 ‘‘(2) TEAM OR SUBSET.—The employees in10 cluded within the team or subset described in para11 graph (1) may change as required to meet the needs 

12 of the Social Security Administration, provided that 

13 procedures have been established to— 

14 ‘‘(A) ensure continuity of records and case 

15 history, and 

16 ‘‘(B) notify the individual when appro17 priate.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) shall take effect 180 days after the date 

20 of enactment of this Act. 

Passed the Senate June 16, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3731 

AN ACT 

To amend title VII of the Social Security Act to 

victims of identity theft. Security Administration for individuals who are provide for a single point of contact at the Social
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-87553, 333-95279, 333-95933,333-36228, 333-40476, 333-44418, 333-51504, 333-63080, 333-81776, 333-87553, 333-123861) of Critical Path, Inc. of our report dated April 29, 2005 relating to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K/A. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

April 29, 2005
#### Pensacola Sanitarium, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Joseph D. Wilkins, *Defendant in Error.*

Where an injury is a superficial burn, not permanent in its *408nature, and the admission of mortuary tables in evidence is followed by an excessive verdict, the judgment will be reversed.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Escambia .County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*Sullivan*& *Sullivan,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*John P. Stokes*and *R. P. Reese,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

In the Circuit Court for Escambia county Wilkins recovered judgment for $1,250.00, with interest from date of suit, against the Pensacola Sanitarium, a corporation, for personal injuries to the plaintiff whose leg was burned by a hot water bottle left in plaintiffs bed while he was a patient in the sanitarium. On writ of error taken by the defendant corporation it is contended that errors in the proceedings were committed by the trial court, among them being the admission of mortuary tables in evidence and in not granting a new trial on the grounds that the verdict is excessive and not justified by the evidence.

The injury in this case was a superficial burn several inches long, or perhaps two inches wide, between the knee and the ankle. It is apparent from the testimony that the injury is not permanent or of a very serious nature, and the admission of the mortuary tables in evidence was well calculated under the circumstances to influence the jury in returning a verdict that is clearly excessive in amount.

*409The judgment is reversed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.

Taylor, J., absent on account of illness, concurred in the opinion as prepared.
§ 151.117 Advance planning proposals: Procedures; application. ( a ) Each eligible sponsor desiring to obtain Federal aid for the purpose of advance planning and engineering must submit a completed FAA Form 3731, “Advance Planning Proposal”, to the Area Manager.
( b ) The airport layout plan, if in existence, must accompany the advance planning proposal. If the advance planning proposal includes preparation of plans and specifications, enough details to identify the items of development to be covered by the plans and specifications must be shown. The proposal must be accompanied by evidentiary material establishing the basis for the estimated costs under the proposal, such as an offer from an engineering firm containing a schedule of services and charges therefor.
[Doc. No. 6227, 30 FR 8040, June 23, 1965, as amended by Amdt. 151-11, 31 FR 6686, May 5, 1966]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,265
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,404
<INVENTORY>                                     53,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,585
<PP&E>                                         119,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,775
<SALES>                                        214,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               214,531
<CGS>                                          161,881
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  187,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (55)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   315
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,363
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,226
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,226
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.02










</TABLE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned officer and/or director of EMERGING GAMMA CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),  hereby constitutes and appoints Jerry
W.  Jarrell  and  D.B.H.  Chaffe  III,  and each of  them,  with  full  power of
substitution and resubstitution,  as attorney to sign for the undersigned in any
and all capacities the  Corporation's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended March 31, 1999 and any and all amendments thereto, with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission and with full power and authority to do and perform any and
all  acts  and  things  whatsoever  required  and  necessary  to be  done in the
premises,  as fully to all intents and purposes as the  undersigned  could do if
personally  present.  The undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said
attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  or any  of his  substitute  or  substitutes,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof and incorporate such changes as
any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems appropriate.



Burt H. Keenan

June 17, 1999




                                                        18