alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Plan of Operations for Cable-Only Delilah 3-D Seismic Survey, Big 
Thicket National Preserve, Texas

AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Plan of Operations for Cable-Only 
Delilah 3-D Seismic Survey at Big Thicket National Preserve.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in accordance with 36 CFR 9.52(b), of a 
Plan of Operations submitted by Cimarex Energy, Co., for a cable-only 
3-D seismic survey, Hardin County, Texas.

DATES: The above document is available for pubic review and comment 
through February 9, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The Plan of Operations is available for public review and 
comment in the Office of the Superintendent, Todd Brindle, Big Thicket 
National Preserve, 6044 FM 420, Kountze, Texas 77625. The document is 
also available at the Planning, Environment and Public Comment (PEPC) 
Web site at http://parkplanning.nps gov/bith/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Haigler ``Dusty'' Pate, Natural 
Resource Program Manager, Big Thicket National Preserve, 6044 FM 420, 
Kountze, Texas 77625, Telephone: 409-951-6822, e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b331a121c171e092b1a0f1e3b150b08551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="30785159575c554260514455705e40431e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you wish to comment on the Plan of 
Operations, you may mail comments to the name and address above or post 
comments online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/bith/. This Plan of 
Operations will be on public review for 30 days. Before including your 
address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying 
information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire 
comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made 
publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to 
withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we 
cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

    Dated: December 15, 2008.
Todd W. Brindle,
Superintendent, Big Thicket National Preserve.
 [FR Doc. E9-25 Filed 1-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-CB-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 373 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 373

To provide for the retention and service of transgender individuals in 
                           the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2019

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself, Ms. Collins, and Mr. Reed) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the retention and service of transgender individuals in 
                           the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETENTION AND SERVICE OF TRANSGENDER INDIVIDUALS IN THE 
              ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) individuals who are qualified and can meet the 
        standards to serve in the military should be eligible to serve; 
        and
            (2) the policies recommended in the memorandum of the 
        Secretary of Defense entitled ``Military Service by Transgender 
        Individuals'' and dated February 22, 2018, are inconsistent 
        with this goal.
    (b) Retention of Currently Serving Members of the Armed Forces.--An 
individual serving as a member of the Armed Forces on or after the date 
of the enactment of this Act may not be involuntarily separated from 
the Armed Forces, or denied reenlistment or continuation in service in 
the Armed Forces, solely on the basis of the member's gender identity. 
Nothing in this subsection relieves a member from meeting applicable 
military and medical standards, including deployability, or requires 
retention of the member in service if the member fails to meet such 
standards.
    (c) Accession Into the Armed Forces.--On or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, an individual may not be denied initial 
enlistment, commissioning, or other accession into the Armed Forces 
solely on the basis of the individual's gender identity. Nothing in 
this subsection relieves an individual from meeting applicable military 
and medical standards, including deployability, for enlistment, 
commissioning, or other accession.
    (d) Gender Identity Defined.--In this section, the term ``gender 
identity'' means the gender-related identity, appearance, mannerisms, 
or other gender-related characteristics of an individual, regardless of 
the individual's designated sex at birth.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1264.128 Sanctions. ( a ) The presiding officer may sanction a person, including any party or representative for— ( 1 ) Failing to comply with an order, rule, or procedure governing the proceeding;
( 2 ) Failing to prosecute or defend an action; or
( 3 ) Engaging in other misconduct that interferes with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of the hearing.
( b ) Any such sanction, including but not limited to those listed in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section, shall reasonably relate to the severity and nature of the failure or misconduct.
( c ) When a party fails to comply with an order, including an order for taking a deposition, the production of evidence within the party's control, or a request for admission, the presiding officer may— ( 1 ) Draw an inference in favor of the requesting party with regard to the information sought;
( 2 ) In the case of requests for admission, deem each matter of which an admission is requested to be admitted;
( 3 ) Prohibit the party failing to comply with such order from introducing evidence concerning, or otherwise relying upon testimony relating to, the information sought; and
( 4 ) Strike any part of the pleadings or other submissions of the party failing to comply with such request.
( d ) If a party fails to prosecute or defend an action under this part commenced by service of a notice of hearing, the presiding officer may dismiss the action or may issue an initial decision imposing penalties and assessments.
( e ) The presiding officer may refuse to consider any motion, request, response, brief, or other document which is not filed in a timely fashion.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08403]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Intelligent Transportation Systems Program Advisory Committee; 
Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: ITS Joint Program Office, Office of the Assistant Secretary for 
Research and Technology, U.S. Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program Advisory 
Committee (ITSPAC) will hold a teleconference on May 13, 2015, from 
1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. (EDT).
    The ITSPAC, established under Section 5305 of Public Law 109-59, 
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A 
Legacy for Users, August 10, 2005, and re-established under Section 
53003 of Public Law 112-141, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st 
Century, July 6, 2012, was created to advise the Secretary of 
Transportation on all matters relating to the study, development, and 
implementation of intelligent transportation systems. Through its 
sponsor, the ITS Joint Program Office (JPO), the ITSPAC makes 
recommendations to the Secretary regarding ITS Program needs, 
objectives, plans, approaches, content, and progress.
    The following is a summary of the meeting tentative agenda: (1) 
Welcome, (2) Meeting Purpose, (3) Subcommittee Updates, (4) Review 
Action Items, (5) Summary and Adjourn.
    The teleconference will be open to the public, but limited 
conference lines will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. 
Members of the public who wish to participate in the teleconference 
must submit a request to ITSPAC@dot.gov, not later than May 6, 2015. In 
addition, for planning purposes, your request must also indicate 
whether you wish to present oral statements during the teleconference.
    Questions about the agenda or written comments may be submitted by 
U.S. Mail to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology, ITS Joint Program 
Office, Attention: Stephen Glasscock, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., HOIT, 
Washington, DC 20590 or faxed to (202) 493-2027. The ITS JPO requests 
that written comments be submitted not later than May 6, 2015.
    Notice of this teleconference is provided in accordance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act and the General Services Administration 
regulations (41 CFR part 102-3) covering management of Federal advisory 
committees.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on the 8 day of April, 2015.
Stephen Glasscock,
Designated Federal Official, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2015-08403 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
```
#### Grider *v.*The State.

*Violating Prohibition Lato.*

(Decided February 3rd, 1914.

64 South. 756.)

*Intoxicating Liquors; Belling, Etc., Evidence.*— In the absence of evidence that the defendant was connected with, or had control of, a building situated across the street from his place of business, it was improper to overrule a motion to exclude evidence of the fact that the sheriff found some beer in such building; and the defendant was entitled to have the jury instructed that they could not consider such testimony unless they believed from the evidence that the defendant had some connection with or control over such old building.

Appeal from Covington Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. H. Alston.

John D. Grider was convicted of violating tbe prohibition laws and be appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Baldwin & Murphy, for appellant.

Tbe state having failed to connect tbe defendant with tbe beer, and. having failed to show that tbe defendant bad any connection with or .control over tbe building in which it was found, tbe court erred in permitting tbe sheriff to testify that be found beer there, and in what quantities. *Patterson v. The State,*62 South. 1023.

Robert C. Brickell, Attorney General, and T. H. Seay, Assistant Attorney General, for tbe State.

Tbe matters complained of were properly submitted to tbe jury for their determination, and no error was committed in tbe admission of evidence or refusal of charges requested.

PELHAM, J.

The court was in error admitting evidence of beer having been found in a building with *171which the defendant was not shown to have had any connection, and in refusing to instruct the jury at the written request of the defendant that it could not consider this testimony if they believed the defendant had no connection with the said building in which the beer was found. See the case of *Will Cravey v. State, infra,*64 South. 756, decided by this court at the present term. For the errors pointed out, the judgment of the lower court must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1042 PLATE 13

Phosphoria formation

=
5 .
2 "1 12 13 24 25 26 31
&
= , Bull Lake Baldwin Cree
£ Togwotee Pass . n
3 == = =
8
g .
£ Forellen Peak Omics Red Creek airs 26 miles Burroughs Creek 25.5 miles Dinwoody Canyon 15 miles 30 miles
a SS
—s me . Q
=== 3 §
7 — — x € $
———— | ¢ 2
SSS oy E g
RSSSes === R 2 le
SSS = Ey 2 Pe
SSasS 3 & (re
Se
See
<SSes
SSSR SS ESSN
Vertical scale = = Saas
175! NY =
u . —
£ S
2
———|
t~ 150’ a
s
SS) SS 5
9 ~\ ee
2
2
8
E SS a
2 —
+ 125" o s
S
E| oh _] ~ : —— =< g
ra — ———— E
5 ===. === E
t- 100’ —— — + u ss z =| 3
Ss ee 2
——— ===== =
=== Rizezeae: a
~ — ‘ o
8
3
+ 75" © SS =s \s
& ®
5 ? 3
? 5
Ss Suit “fe
SSSsssy =
2 2
+ 50’ :
?
ry
= al
Los! 5 2 a]
~? a
} 2 8
[ 8 ? :
3 £
r S £
5 =
I a g
Lo! 3 EXPLANATION :
a 4 | J a
o CORRELATION LINES ROCK NAMES ADJECTIVES 111° 110° 109° s —s So €
r Symbols used in combinati e === 5
symbols used in combination 7 5 ———
with those in column to left aoe 9 :
E
Member and formation contact === pH f NATIONAL e
a
z = = | Al! E a
> > Carbonate rock Carbonatic 44° ——— a
HH? ‘ ll s
Bed contact, queried where I \ , : 5
correlation is uncertain a 8 f] 13 24 ‘
Sandstone Sandy pe —<s
o— —ot
Key horizon, recognizable by IDAHO|/W YOM ING on
distinctive lithologic character ! 25
Chert Cherty I
26
43° v
31
Mudstone H
a2 L 1/ King, 1947
Covered Phosphorite Phosphatic Slightly phosphatic INDEX MAP _2] Thomas, 1948

Tensleep sandstone

CORRELATION CHART OF THE PHOSPHORIA FORMATION FROM FORELLEN PEAK, WYOMING, TO BALDWIN CREEK, WYOMING

394091 © ~57 (In pocket) No. 5

Dinwoody formation
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
      knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of ANTs software
      inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended September
      30, 2006:





1.  Fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This
      certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be
      deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any
      purpose whatsoever.





Date: November
      14, 2006





By:  /s/
      Kenneth
      Ruotolo Kenneth
      Ruotolo, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
      Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
      request.
Exhibit 99.2

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and  accompanies  the annual  report on Form 10-KSB (the "form") for the
year ended March 31, 2003 of Emerging Gamma Corporation (the "Issuer").

I, Allen F. Campbell, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (i)      the  Form  10-KSB  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
                  section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
                  of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information  contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents,
                  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Issuer.


Dated:  June 25, 2003

         By: /S/ ALLEN F. CAMPBELL
            ----------------------
            Chief Executive Officer
            (Principal Executive Officer)

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 25Th day of June 2003.


   /S/ IRENE MARTINEZ
-------------------------
Name:  Irene Martinez
     Title: Notary Public


<PAGE>

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and  accompanies  the annual  report on Form 10-KSB (the "form") for the
year ended March 31, 2003 of Emerging Gamma Corporation (the "Issuer").

I, Jerry W. Jarrell,  the Chief Financial  Officer of Issuer certify that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (iii)    the  Form  10-KSB  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
                  section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
                  of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (iv)     the information  contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents,
                  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Issuer.


Dated:  June 25, 2003

         By: /S/ JERRY W. JARRELL
            ---------------------
            Chief Financial Officer
            (Principal Financial Officer)

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 25Th day of June 2003.


   /S/ IRENE MARTINEZ
-------------------------
Name:  Irene Martinez
     Title: Notary Public
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         536,574
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,365,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,179,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,369,997
<PP&E>                                       1,434,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,929,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,630,930
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       130,400
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,069,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,929,199
<SALES>                                     37,908,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,908,464
<CGS>                                       28,555,565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,555,565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,124,372
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             199,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (937,109)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (937,109)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (937,109)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Jarbidge Field Office Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental

Impact Statement

Lead Agency: US Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management

Type of Action: Final, Administrative

Jurisdiction: Elmore, Owyhee, and Twin Falls Counties, Idaho and Elko County, Nevada

Abstract: 

This Proposed Resource Management Plan (RMP) and Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

describes and analyzes the impacts of seven alternatives for managing the public lands administered by 

the Jarbidge Field Office in southern Idaho. The alternatives provide a variety of methods to guide the 

multiple-use management of resources and resource uses. 

Planning issues addressed include: vegetation, livestock grazing, recreation, energy development, and 

Areas of Critical Environmental Concern. Vegetation issues are further divided into concerns over fuels 

treatments, fire rehabilitation, and fire suppression; habitat for fish, wildlife, and special status plants and 

animals (including greater sage-grouse); and livestock forage.

Protest: 

This Proposed RMP and Final EIS is open for a 30-day protest period beginning on the date the Notice of 

Availability of the Final EIS is published in the Federal Register. A protest may raise only those issues 

that were submitted during the planning process (see 43 Code of Federal Regulations 1610.5-2). Protests 

must be filed with the Director, Bureau of Land Management as described in the Dear Reader Letter. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Heidi Whitlach, RMP Project Manager 

2536 Kimberly Road

Twin Falls, Idaho 83301 

(208) 736-2351
§ 708a.103 Board of directors' approval and members' opportunity to comment. ( a ) A credit union's board of directors must comply with the following notice requirements before voting on a proposal to convert. ( 1 ) No later than 30 days before a board of directors votes on a proposal to convert, it must publish a notice in a general circulation newspaper, or in multiple newspapers if necessary, serving all areas where the credit union has an office, branch, or service center. It must also post the notice in a clear and conspicuous fashion in the lobby of the credit union's home office and branch offices and on the credit union's Web site, if it has one. If the notice is not on the home page of the Web site, the home page must have a clear and conspicuous link, visible on a standard monitor without scrolling, to the notice.
( 2 ) The public notice must include the following: ( i ) The name and address of the credit union;
( ii ) The type of institution to which the credit union's board is considering a proposal to convert;
( iii ) A brief statement of why the board is considering the conversion and the major positive and negative effects of the proposed conversion;
( iv ) A statement that directs members to submit any comments on the proposal to the credit union's board of directors by regular mail, electronic mail, or facsimile;
( v ) The date on which the board plans to vote on the proposal and the date by which members must submit their comments for consideration, which may not be more than 5 days before the board vote;
( vi ) The street address, electronic mail address, and facsimile number of the credit union where members may submit comments; and
( vii ) A statement that, in the event the board approves the proposal to convert, the proposal will be submitted to the membership of the credit union for a vote following a notice period that is no shorter than 90 days.
( 3 ) The board of directors must approve publication of the notice.
( b ) The credit union must collect member comments and retain copies at the credit union's main office until the conversion process is completed.
( c ) The board of directors may vote on the conversion proposal only after reviewing and considering all member comments. The conversion proposal may only be approved by an affirmative vote of a majority of board members who have determined the conversion is in the best interests of the members. If approved, the board of directors must set a date for a vote on the proposal by the members of the credit union.
[71 FR 77167, Dec. 22, 2006. Redesignated at 75 FR 81386, Dec. 28, 2010]