alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                    COUNTRY OF
                                                  INCORPORATION OR
            SUBSIDIARY                             ORGANIZATION
            ----------                            ----------------
<S>                                               <C>
CoSine Communications Australia Pty Ltd             Australia
CoSine Communications Argentina Srl                 Argentina
CoSine Cayman Ltd                                   Cayman Islands
CoSine Communications Finland Oy                    Finland
CoSine Communications Sarl                          France
CoSine Communications Deutschland GmbH              Germany
CoSine Communications Hong Kong Ltd                 Hong Kong
CoSine Software (India) Private Limited             India
CoSine Communications Italia Srl                    Italy
CoSine Communications KK                            Japan
CoSine Communications Malaysia Sdn Bhd              Malaysia
CoSine Communications BV                            Netherlands
CoSine Communications Singapore, Pte Ltd            Singapore
CoSine Communications Espana SL                     Spain
CoSine Communications Sverige AB                    Sweden
CoSine Communications Ltd                           United Kingdom
</Table>
EXHIBIT A

PARTY APPEARANCE SHEET

Name of Party Unión de Trabajadores de 

la Industria Eléctrica y 

Riego Inc.

Party Name Abbreviation 

(For Use with Zoom2) UTIER

Attorney(s) Representing Party (provide the listed information for

each attorney who may appear for the Party):

• Name,

• Email,

• Law Firm,

• Phone Number

• Docket Entry No. for the Attorney’s Notice of Appearance

• Zoom Screen Name (See Disclosure Statement Hearing

Procedures Order, ¶ 7(a))

or

Party-in-interest Not Represented by Counsel:

• Name, Email, Phone Number, Proof of Claim Number (if any)

Rolando EmmanuelliJiménez

rolando@emmanuelli.law

Bufete Emmanuelli, CSP

787-848-0666

Docket No. 29 (17-04780)

Jessica E. MéndezColberg

jessica@emmanuelli.law

Bufete Emmanuelli, CSP

787-848-0666

Zoé C. Negrón-Comas

zoe@emmanuelli.law

Bufete Emmanuelli, CSP

787-848-0666

Docket No. 2786 (17-

04780)

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24129-1 Filed:05/04/23 Entered:05/04/23 08:59:09 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A

PARTY APPEARANCE SHEET

Name of Party Sistema de Retiro de los 

Empleados de la Autoridad de 

Energía Eléctrica

Party Name Abbreviation 

(For Use with Zoom2) SREAEE

Attorney(s) Representing Party (provide the listed information for

each attorney who may appear for the Party):

• Name,

• Email,

• Law Firm,

• Phone Number

• Docket Entry No. for the Attorney’s Notice of Appearance

• Zoom Screen Name (See Disclosure Statement Hearing

Procedures Order, ¶ 7(a))

or

Party-in-interest Not Represented by Counsel:

• Name, Email, Phone Number, Proof of Claim Number (if any)

Rolando Emmanuelli-Jiménez

rolando@emmanuelli.law

Bufete Emmanuelli, CSP

787-848-0666

Docket No. 769 (17-04780)

Jessica E. Méndez-Colberg

jessica@emmanuelli.law

Bufete Emmanuelli, CSP

787-848-0666

Zoé C. Negrón-Comas

zoe@emmanuelli.law

Bufete Emmanuelli, CSP

787-848-0666

Docket No. 2787 (17-04780)

Rafael A. Ortiz-Mendoza

rafael.ortiz.mendoza@gmail.com

Ortiz Mendoza & Farinacci 

Fernós, LLC

787-963-0404

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24129-1 Filed:05/04/23 Entered:05/04/23 08:59:09 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32 (i)

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, I, James G. Rakes, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)   such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.

 

 

| /s/ JAMES G. RAKES                                                                                |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| James G. RakesPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

August 11, 2008 |
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Corvis Corporation:

   We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-47104) on Form S-8 of Corvis Corporation of our reports dated January 27,
2003, except as to Note 16(c), which is as of February 24, 2003 and Note 17
which is as of February 22, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Corvis Corporation as of December 29, 2001 and December 28, 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit)
and cash flows for the years ended December 30, 2000, December 29, 2001 and
December 28, 2002, and the related financial statement schedule, which reports
appear in the December 28, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Corvis
Corporation.

   As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, Corvis Corporation
changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to
adopt the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
March 21, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 6375-006]

In Accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order 486, 52 FR 47897), the Commission's Office of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the revocation of the exemption for the Slaughterhouse Gulch Project, No. 6375-006. The Slaughterhouse Gulch Project is located on Slaughterhouse Gulch Creek in Twin Falls County, Idaho. The exemption is being revoked for failure to operate the project or to respond to requests to surrender the exemption. A Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) was prepared, and the FEA finds that revoking the exemption would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.

                    The FEA has been attached to and made a part of an Order Revoking Exemption from licensing, issued April 26, 2000, for the Slaughterhouse Gulch Project (FERC No. 6375-006). The FEA is available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference and Information Center, Room 2A, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. Copies of the FEA also may be obtained by calling (202) 208-1371, or by e-mail at                     *Public.ReferenceRoom@ferc.fed.us.*                     The FEA may also be viewed on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call (202) 208-2222 for assistance).                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10888  Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 1215.107 User data security and frequency authorizations. ( a ) User data security is not provided by the TDRSS. Responsibility for data security resides solely with the user. Users desiring data safeguards shall provide and operate, external to the TDRSS, the necessary equipment or systems to accomplish data security. Any such user provisions must be compatible with data flow through TDRSS and not interfere with other users.
( b ) All radio frequency authorizations associated with operations pursuant to this directive are the responsibility of the user. If appropriate, authority(ies) must be obtained from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for operations consistent with U.S. footnote 303 of the National Table of Frequency Allocations, FCC Rules and Regulations, at 47 CFR 2.106.
[56 FR 28049, June 19, 1991]
Order filed, April 18, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-01030-CR

____________

GINGER DEEANNA FISHER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08-DCR-048916A

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 19, 2011, 2012. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. On March 8, 2012, this court ordered Elizabeth Wittu to file the record 

on or before April 6, 2012. On April 9, 2012 she filed a motion for extension of time to 

file the record which was GRANTED until April 16, 2012. On April 17, 2012 a second

motion for extension of time to file the record was filed. To date, the record has not been 

filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record was not filed within the time 
prescribed in the first request, the court GRANTS your second request and issues the 

following order.

We order Elizabeth Wittu, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal on or before May 17, 2012. No further extension will be entertained. The trial 

and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely 

filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Elizabeth Wittu does not timely file the record as 

ordered, the Court may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to 

determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.8



                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                          AT&T WIRELESS CAPITAL TRUST I

         This Certificate of Trust is being executed as of April 24, 2003 for
the purposes of organizing a statutory trust pursuant to the Delaware Statutory
Trust Act, 12 Del C. ss.ss. 3801 et seq (the "Act")

         The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

         1.       Name: The name of the statutory trust is "AT&T Wireless
Capital Trust I" (the "Trust").

         2.       Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the
Delaware resident trustee of the Trust meeting the requirements of Section 3807
of the Act are as follows:

                  U.S. Bank Trust National Association
                  300 East Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
                  Wilmington, DE  19809

         3.       Effective. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
immediately upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware.


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the trustees of the
Trust, have duly executed this Certificate of Trust as of the day and year first
above written.

                                    U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS
                                    DELAWARE TRUSTEE



                                    By: /s/ Frank P. Leslie III
                                       ---------------------
                                    Name: Frank P. Leslie III
                                    Title: Vice President


                                    U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS
                                    PROPERTY TRUSTEE



                                    By: /s/ Frank P. Leslie III
                                       ---------------------
                                    Name: Frank P. Leslie III
                                    Title: Vice President


                                    ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE



                                    By: /s/ Phil Sisneros
                                       ---------------------
                                       Phil Sisneros


                                    ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE



                                    By: /s/ Errol Harris
                                       ---------------------
                                       Errol Harris


                                      -2-
|   | 1. | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      O’Neil Nalavadi                                    |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| O’Neil      Nalavadi                                        |   |
| Senior      Vice President                                        |   |
| Chief      Financial Officerand      Principal Accounting Officer |   |
|                                                              |   |
| February      10, 2010                                            |   |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 4(h)

                  NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

                                      RIDER

                     4 YEAR SURVIVORSHIP TERM LIFE INSURANCE

POLICY NUMBER                                                          9,000,000

RIDER ISSUE DATE                                                      09/01/2002

This Rider is attached to and made part of this Policy.

The Company will pay the Beneficiary the Rider Death Benefit upon receipt of due
proof of both Insureds' death on or before the Expiry Date of this Rider,
subject to the terms and conditions set forth below. Unless otherwise provided,
the Owner and Beneficiary of this rider are the same as the Owner and
Beneficiary of the Policy to which this Rider is attached.

RIDER DEATH BENEFIT. The death benefit of this Rider is an amount equal to 1.25
multiplied by the Face amount of the Policy, as shown in the Policy Schedule.

EXPIRY DATE. The Expiry Date of this Rider is the end of the fourth Policy Year.

COST. The cost of insurance for this Rider is included in the monthly deductions
for the Policy to which this Rider is attached. It is determined by multiplying
the monthly cost of insurance rate divided by 1,000 by the Rider Death Benefit.
The monthly deduction for this Rider will cease upon the termination of this
Rider.

The monthly cost of insurance rate is based on each Insured's Sex, Issue Age and
Premium Class and the Rider's duration. Monthly cost of insurance rates will be
determined by us, based on our expectations as to future mortality costs and
expenses. Any change in cost of insurance rates will be in accordance with the
Changes In Policy Cost Factors Provision of the Policy. The cost of insurance
rates will never be greater than the Guaranteed Monthly Rider Cost Per $1,000 of
Insurance Amount shown in the Policy Schedule.

CHANGE IN RIDER DEATH BENEFIT. After the first Policy Year, the amount of this
Rider may decrease if the Face Amount of the Policy is decreased. The death
benefit of the Rider will always equal 1.25 multiplied by the Face Amount shown
in the Policy Schedule.

TERMINATION. This rider will terminate:

   1. upon written request;

   2. on its Expiry Date or the prior surrender or other termination of the
      Policy to which it is attached; or

   3. upon exercise of the Policy Split Option Rider, if included with the
      Policy to which this Rider is attached.

Attached by Nationwide Life Insurance Company of America on the issue date of
this Rider.


/s/ Gary D. McMahan
President


Form C309                                                                (11.96)
#### Alice Gordon, *et al., Plaintiffs in Error,*v. Martha Lowe, *et al., Defendants in Error.*

1. When, the death of a sole plaintiff is suggested on the record and his heirs are by order of the court under the statute substituted as plaintiffs in his stead, such substitution sufficiently adjudicates the death of the original plaintiff for the purposes of the case.

2. Oral testimony that a deed of conveyance was reported to have been made is incompetent to show title.

*823. In' an action of ejectment where there is no evidence on which a verdict may lawfully be found for the defendants, and the title of the plaintiff appears, a verdict for the plaintiff may be directed.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*J. W. Kehoe, T. F. West,*and *Emmett Wilson,*for Plaints *in Error;*

*J. T. Wiggins,*for Defendants in Error.

Whitfield, C. J.

In an action of ejectment the plaintiffs recovered judgment and the defendants took writ of error. The plaintiffs claimed as the heirs of the patentee of the land from the United States. It is contended that the proofs do not show the death of the patentee. The action was begun by William Wiggins, the patentee, as sole plaintiff. Subsequently his death was suggested and his heirs were substituted as plaintiffs in his stead as provided by the statute. No contest was made as the statute contemplates, and the order adjudging the death of the sole plaintiff and substituting his heirs as his legal representatives was duly made upon proper notice. This sufficiently adjudicates the death of the original plaintiff for the purposes of this proceeding.'

The defendants claimed a conveyance had been made by the patentee to their ancestor, but no proper evidence of such conveyance was offered. Oral testimony that a deed of conveyance was reported to have been made is incompetent to show title. See Harris v. Butler, 52 Fla. *83253, 42 South. Rep. 186. No title in the defendants by adverse possession was shown, and the legal title of the plaintiffs as the heirs of the patentee properly prevailed There was no error in directing a verdict for the plaintiffs since there was no evidence upon which a verdict could lawfully have been rendered for the defendants. Tedder v. Fraleigh-Lines-Smith Co., 55 Fla. 496, 46 South. Rep. 419.

The judgment is affirmed.

Taylor, Shackleford, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24930-24934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10576]



[[Page 24930]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00-34]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 00-34 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: April 24, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C

[[Page 24931]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28AP00.004


[[Page 24932]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28AP00.005


[[Page 24933]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28AP00.006


[[Page 24934]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28AP00.007

[FR Doc. 00-10576 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### M EMORANDUM 

### O RDER 

### R ECALLING 

### M ANDATE

Appellate case name: Johanna Dabbs v. Vincent Calderon

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 598

- CV

Trial court case number: 2011

- 76748

Trial court: 3 33rd District Court of Harris County

On May 20, 2016 , mandate in the above

- referenced cause issued. On May 25, 20 16

, Vincent Calderon filed a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc , complaining of a clerical error in

the judgment to enforce the judgment against Dabb s ’s surety on her supersedeas bond and for any costs taxed against Dabbs. No response was filed. On July 28, 2016, the Court recalled its May 20, 2016 mandate, and on A ugust 25, 2016, the Court issued a corrected judgment and

mandate.

On September 22 , 2016, Calderon filed a n emergency motion for clarification of the August 25, 2016 mandate . Calderon contends that the mandate should state that Dabb s ’s surety

, Western Surety Company

, i s jointly and severally liable with Dabbs for the entire amount of the trial court’s judgment, rather than the face amount of the bond, $30,000

. Western Surety filed a response in opposition to the motion , arguing that the Court should de ny the motion or, alternatively, clarify the mandate to state that Western Surety is jointly and severally liable with Dabbs only for the amount of the bond

.

After due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that there was a clerical error in the Augu st 25, 2016 judgment and mandate of the Court in this cause, specifically, that the Court did

not state that Western Surety ’s joint and several liability is limited to the amount of the bond.

The Court denies Calderon’s September 22 , 20 16 motion and orders the Clerk of this

Court to recall the mandate issued in this case on August 25 , 2016 . It is further ordered that the Clerk of this Court instruct the clerk of the court below immediately to return the recalled

mandate to the Clerk of this Court. E xecution on this Court’s judgment may not commence until

the Clerk of this Court issues a new mandate



### . See T EX



### . R. A PP



### . P. 18.7.

It is so ORDERED.Judge’s signature: /s/ Harve y Brown

X Acting individually  Acting for the C ourt

Date: October 4, 2 016