alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 13.43 Service and filing of pleadings, motions, and documents. ( a ) *General rule.* A party must file all requests for hearing, pleadings, motions, and documents with the FAA Hearing Docket, and must serve a copy upon all parties to the proceedings.
( b ) *Methods of filing.* Filing must be by email, personal delivery, expedited or overnight courier express service, mail, or fax.
( c ) *Address for filing.* A person filing a document with the FAA Hearing Docket must use the address identified for the method of filing as follows: ( 1 ) *If delivery is in person, or by expedited or overnight express courier service.* Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue SW, Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W100, Washington, DC 20597; Attention: FAA Hearing Docket, AGC-70.
( 2 ) *If delivery is via U.S. mail, or U.S. certified or registered mail.* Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: FAA Hearing Docket, AGC-70, Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W100.
( 3 ) *Contact information.* The FAA Office of Adjudication will make available on its website an email address and fax number for the FAA Hearing Docket, as well as other contact information.
( d ) *Requirement to file an original document and number of copies.* A party must file an original document and one copy when filing by personal delivery or by mail. Only one copy must be filed if filing is accomplished by email or fax.
( e ) *Filing by email.* A document that is filed by email must be attached as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file to an email. The document must be signed in accordance with § 13.207. The email message does not constitute a submission, but serves only to deliver the attached PDF file to the FAA Hearing Docket.
( f ) *Methods of service* — ( 1 ) *General.* A person may serve any document by email, personal delivery, expedited or overnight courier express service, mail, or fax.
( 2 ) *Service by email.* Service of documents by email is voluntary and requires the prior consent of the person to be served by email. A person may retract consent to be served by email by filing and serving a written retraction. A document that is served by email must be attached as a PDF file to an email message.
( g ) *Certificate of service.* A certificate of service must accompany all documents filed with the FAA Hearing Docket. The certificate of service must be signed, describe the method of service, and state the date of service.
( h ) *Date of filing and service.* If a document is sent by fax or email, the date of filing and service is the date the email or fax is sent. If a document is sent by personal delivery or by expedited or overnight express courier service, the date of filing and service is the date that delivery is accomplished. If a document is mailed, the date of filing and service is the date shown on the certificate of service, the date shown on the postmark if there is no certificate of service, or the mailing date shown by other evidence if there is no certificate of service or postmark.
# 11 1278591 - R8SDMS 

# STATE OF COLORADO

John W. Hickenlooper, Governor Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 Phone (303) 692-2000 Locatediin Glendale, Colorado www.colorado.gov/cdphe Gilorado Department ofPublic Health and Environment
February 21, 2014 Mr. Martin Hestmark U.S. EPA Region 8 (EPR-SR) 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, Colorado 80202 RE: CDPHE Concurrence onPartial Deletion of OperableUnits 4,5 and 7 of theCalifornia Gulch Superfund Site,Lake County, Colorado Dear Mr. Hestmark: The Colorado Department ofPublic Health and Environment (CDPHE)has reviewed the direct final Notice ofPartial Deletion for Operable Units 4, 5 and 7 ofthe California Gulch Superfund Site in Lake County, Colorado. ^ EPA and the State have determinedthat all appropriate response actions under theComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, mid Liability Act (CERCLA) have beencompleted, with the exception of operation and maintenance,monitoring, and five-year reviews. Furthermore, institutional controls (ICs) are in place, in the form of county and cityordinances, in order toensure long-term protectiveness ofthe remedy. EPA will continue to conduct five-year reviews. Therefore, CDPHE agreesthat all necessary actions have been takento delete OperableUnits 4, 5 and 7 ofthe California Gulch Superfund Site from the National Priorities List. Sincerely,

GaryW. Baughman Director Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division

cc: Scott Schultz, AGO Doug Jamison, CDPHE Monica Sheets^ CDPHE
§ 611.1245 Stockholder reconsideration. ( a ) *Right to reconsider termination.* Voting stockholders have the right to reconsider their approval of the termination if a petition signed by at least 15 percent of the voting stockholders is filed with us within 35 days after you mail notices to stockholders that the termination was approved. If we determine that the petition complies with the requirements of section 7.9 of the Act, you must call a special stockholders' meeting to reconsider the vote. The meeting must occur within 60 days after the date on which you mailed to stockholders the results of the termination vote.
( b ) *Quorum requirement for termination reconsideration vote.* At least 30 percent, unless your bylaws provide for a higher quorum, of the voting stockholders of the institution must be present at the stockholders' meeting either in person or by proxy in order to hold the reconsideration vote. If a majority of the voting stockholders voting in person or by proxy vote against the termination, the termination may not take place.
( c ) *Stockholder list and expenses.* You must, at your expense, timely give stockholders who request it a list of the names and addresses of stockholders eligible to vote in the reconsideration vote. The petitioners must pay all other expenses for the petition. You must pay expenses that you incur for the reconsideration vote.
WILLIE VINCENT TIMOTHY 

THOMAS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4893

Opinion filed November 20, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

Rudolph C. “Rusty” Shepard Jr., Jean Marie Downing, and Chad R. Templeton, of 

Shepard Law, Panama City, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charlie Lee, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
FINAL Fee Applications Recommended: Applicant Compensation Period Final Fees Requested 

 Fee Examiner's 

Recommended 

Fee Adjustments 

 Final Expenses 

Requested 

 Fee Examiner's 

Recommended 

Expense 

Adjustments 

 Fin

Recom

Ap

1 McKinsey & Company Puerto Rico Consulting, Inc. [Dkt. No. 23789] 7/1/2017 - 3/15/2022 75,317,675.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 7

$ 

2 Phoenix Management Services, LLC [Dkt. No. 23494] 8/4/2017 - 1/21/2022 2,935,747.69 $ - $ 84,283.34 $ - $ 

$ 

Consulting Services Provider to FOMBFinancial Advisor to the Mediation Team

In re: The Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, as a representative of

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al.

PROMESA Title III No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

 29014232.1 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24548-2 Filed:06/13/23 Entered:06/13/23 13:48:28 D

Exhibit B Page 1 of 1
§ 142.47 Training center instructor eligibility requirements. ( a ) A certificate holder may not employ a person as an instructor in a flight training course that is subject to approval by the Administrator unless that person— ( 1 ) Is at least 18 years of age;
( 2 ) Is able to read, write, and speak and understand in the English language;
( 3 ) If instructing in an aircraft in flight, is qualified in accordance with subpart H of part 61 of this chapter;
( 4 ) Satisfies the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section; and
( 5 ) Meets at least one of the following requirements— ( i ) Except as allowed by paragraph (a)(5)(ii) of this section, meets the aeronautical experience requirements of § 61.129 (a), (b), (c), or (e) of this chapter, as applicable, excluding the required hours of instruction in preparation for the commercial pilot practical test;
( ii ) If instructing in flight simulator or flight training device that represents an airplane requiring a type rating or if instructing in a curriculum leading to the issuance of an airline transport pilot certificate or an added rating to an airline transport pilot certificate, meets the aeronautical experience requirements of § 61.159, § 61.161, or § 61.163 of this chapter, as applicable; or
( iii ) Is employed as a flight simulator instructor or a flight training device instructor for a training center providing instruction and testing to meet the requirements of part 61 of this chapter on August 1, 1996.
( b ) A training center must designate each instructor in writing to instruct in each approved course, prior to that person functioning as an instructor in that course.
( c ) Prior to initial designation, each instructor shall: ( 1 ) Complete at least 8 hours of ground training on the following subject matter: ( i ) Instruction methods and techniques.
( ii ) Training policies and procedures.
( iii ) The fundamental principles of the learning process.
( iv ) Instructor duties, privileges, responsibilities, and limitations.
( v ) Proper operation of simulation controls and systems.
( vi ) Proper operation of environmental control and warning or caution panels.
( vii ) Limitations of simulation.
( viii ) Minimum equipment requirements for each curriculum.
( ix ) Revisions to the training courses.
( x ) Cockpit resource management and crew coordination.
( 2 ) Satisfactorily complete a written test— ( i ) On the subjects specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section; and
( ii ) That is accepted by the Administrator as being of equivalent difficulty, complexity, and scope as the tests provided by the Administrator for the flight instructor airplane and instrument flight instructor knowledge tests.
[Doc. No. 26933, 61 FR 34562, July 2, 1996, as amended by Amdt. 142-2, 62 FR 68137, Dec. 30, 1997]
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PALMER

[ane 4

BULLETIN 1030 PLATE 9

SS

Uppr

Huroran
ST

Lower
Huronian

quadrangle (preliminary copy)

Base from U. S. Geological Survey Ishpeming

GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE PALMER AREA, MARQUETTE COUNTY, MICHIGAN

0 1 Mile
L 1 1 1 J

S HYA mes
By by R. C. Vickers and J. H. Eric, August 1953
In part after Hotchkiss, 1903

Keweenawan(?)
——

Middle Huronian

Pre-Huronian

EXPLANATION

La

Metadiabase dike

Ee]

Goodrich quartzite

Negaunee iron-formation

Siamo slate

ag.

Ajibik quartzite

eae

Granite, gneiss, and pegmatite

Possibly includes metamorphosed
fower and middle Huronian rocks

Contact, approximately located

Approximate fault

Inferred fault

wo
Strike and dip of bedding

~oo
Strike and dip of foliation

g ommiws

‘Area of outcrop
Shaft, caved

R
Small open pit, abandoned

PRECAMBRIAN
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ron Howell, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                   Date: November 19, 2010

                                   \s\ Ron Howell
                                   --------------
                                   Ron Howell
                                   Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7442
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DENNIS MERRIMON WATERS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-04-51; CR-01-48) Submitted: February 8, 2006 Decided: February 28, 2006 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Merrimon Waters, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Waters’ sole claim on appeal is that the dis trict court abused its discretion in denying his Rule 59(e) motion. Consequently, Waters has waived appellate review of the court’s underlying denial of his § 2255 motion. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Dennis Merrimon Waters appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Waters v. United States , No. CA-04-51; CR-01-48 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          35,808
<SECURITIES>                                23,896,544
<RECEIVABLES>                                  328,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,261,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          339,332
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,921,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,261,071
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (193,150)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (193,150)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Dwyer Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Buckley,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

By: /s/ Thomas Buckley
   ----------------------
Thomas Buckley
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2003


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to The Dwyer Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Dwyer
     Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
     staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           9,610
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             384
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   770
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,340
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          25,740
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            25,534
<LOANS>                                         81,066
<ALLOWANCE>                                        944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,504
<DEPOSITS>                                     119,858
<SHORT-TERM>                                       447
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,014
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,399
<OTHER-SE>                                         787
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 131,504
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,736
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,416
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   233
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,385
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,985
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,018
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,367
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      220
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,350
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,350
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,971
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.02
<LOANS-NON>                                         79
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   752
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       47
<RECOVERIES>                                        19
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  944
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               833
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            111
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 1251

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1251 appear at 81 FR 3709, Jan. 22, 2016.

#### § 1251.501 Purpose.

The purpose of this regulation is to effectuate section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
§ 1275.104 Conduct of Inquiry by the OIG. ( a ) When an awardee institution or another Federal agency has promptly initiated its own investigation, the OIG may defer its inquiry or investigation until it receives the results of that external investigation. When the OIG does not receive the results within a reasonable time, the OIG shall ordinarily proceed with its own investigation.
( b ) When the OIG decides to initiate a NASA investigation, the OIG must give prompt written notice to the individual or institution to be investigated, unless notice would prejudice the investigation or unless a criminal investigation is underway or under active consideration. If notice is delayed, it must be given as soon as it will no longer prejudice the investigation or contravene requirements of law or Federal law-enforcement policies.
( c ) When alleged misconduct may involve a crime, the OIG shall determine whether any criminal investigation is already pending or projected. If not, the OIG shall determine whether the matter should be referred to the Department of Justice.
( d ) When a criminal investigation by the Department of Justice or another Federal agency is underway or under active consideration, the OIG shall determine what information, if any, may be disclosed to the Respondent or to NASA employees.
( e ) To the extent possible, the identity of sources who wish to remain anonymous shall be kept confidential. To the extent allowed by law, documents and files maintained by the OIG during the course of an inquiry or investigation of misconduct shall be treated as investigative files exempt from mandatory public disclosure upon request under the Freedom of Information Act.
( f ) When the OIG proceeds with its own inquiry, it is responsible for ensuring that the inquiry is completed within 60 days after it is commenced. The OIG may extend this period of time for good cause.
( g ) On the basis of what the OIG learns from an inquiry, and in consultation as appropriate with other NASA offices, the OIG shall decide whether a formal investigation is warranted.
### DBPAIITMBNT OP TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC PACILmU Office ofthe Commissioner



### Mr. Dennis JDeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 June 4, 2012

Re: Essential Air Service to Excursion Inlet (EXl) and Kake (AFE) Dockets DOT -OST -2002-12014 and DOT -OST-2008-0217 Dear 

### Mr. DeVany, SEAN PARNELL, GOVERNOR 4111 Aviation Avenue P.O. Box 196900 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99619-6900
PHONE: {907) 269-0730 FAX: {907) 269-0489 WEB: dot.state.ak.us

This letter is to express support for the continuation ofthe Essential Air Service (EAS) program in Alaska and the crucial connection it brings to ourremote communities. Due to the isolated location ofthese communities and the complete lack ofany road system connection, this subsidized air service is their only form ofscheduled transportation. The communities ofExcursion Inlet and Kake depend on scheduled air freight, passenger, and mail service for basic necessities, routine medical and health services, and economic welfare. The State ofAlaska continues to assert that the local residents are generally best positioned to comment onparticular schedules or aircarriers, and therefore we

### think the community should provide comments to you on those specific areas. I respectfully urge USDOT to support and continue the EAS service at Excursion Inlet and Kake. Sincerely,

"GetAlaskaMoving through service andinfrastructure. "