alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3652

AN ACT

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to

modify the taxation of imported archery products.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3652

AN ACT

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify

the taxation of imported archery products.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3652 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Archery Revenue Re3 form and Opportunity for Workers Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. MODIFIED TAXATION OF IMPORTED ARCHERY

5 PRODUCTS.

6 (a) BOWS.—Paragraph (1) of section 4161(b) of the

7 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to bows) is

8 amended to read as follows:

9 ‘‘(1) BOWS.—

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is hereby im11 posed on the sale by the manufacturer, pro12 ducer, or importer of any bow which has a peak

13 draw weight of 30 pounds or more, a tax equal

14 to 11 percent of the price for which so sold.

15 ‘‘(B) ARCHERY EQUIPMENT.—There is

16 hereby imposed on the sale by the manufac17 turer, producer, or importer—

18 ‘‘(i) of any part or accessory suitable

19 for inclusion in or attachment to a bow de20 scribed in subparagraph (A), and

21 ‘‘(ii) of any quiver or broadhead suit22 able for use with an arrow described in

23 paragraph (2),

24 a tax equal to 11 percent of the price for which

25 so sold.’’.
3

•HR 3652 EH

1 (b) ARROWS.—Subsection (b) of section 4161 of the

2 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to bows and ar3 rows, etc.) is amended by redesignating paragraph (3) as

4 paragraph (4) and inserting after paragraph (2) the fol5 lowing:

6 ‘‘(3) ARROWS.—

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is hereby im8 posed on the sale by the manufacturer, pro9 ducer, or importer of any arrow, a tax equal to

10 12 percent of the price for which so sold.

11 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.—In the case of any

12 arrow of which the shaft or any other compo13 nent has been previously taxed under paragraph

14 (1) or (2)—

15 ‘‘(i) section 6416(b)(3) shall not

16 apply, and

17 ‘‘(ii) the tax imposed by subparagraph

18 (A) shall be an amount equal to the excess

19 (if any) of—

20 ‘‘(I) the amount of tax imposed

21 by this paragraph (determined with22 out regard to this subparagraph), over

23 ‘‘(II) the amount of tax paid with

24 respect to the tax imposed under
4

•HR 3652 EH

1 paragraph (1) or (2) on such shaft or

2 component.

3 ‘‘(C) ARROW.—For purposes of this para4 graph, the term ‘arrow’ means any shaft de5 scribed in paragraph (2) to which additional

6 components are attached.’’.

7 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section

8 4161(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code is amended—

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(other than broadheads)’’

10 after ‘‘point’’, and

11 (2) by striking ‘‘ARROWS.—’’ in the heading

12 and inserting ‘‘ARROW COMPONENTS.—’’.

13 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 this section shall apply to articles sold by the manufac15 turer, producer, or importer after February 15, 2004.

Passed the House of Representatives December 8,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)   In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ron Howell, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: May 15, 2015By:\s\ Ron HowellRon HowellInterim Chief Financial Officer
1

MEMORANDUM

To: Commercial Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator Docket

From: Amy Hambrick, US EPA

Date: April 23, 2012

Subject: EPA Meeting with Commenters 

EPA met with Richard Stoll (Foley & Lardner, LLP), Andrew O’Hare (Portland Cement 

Association), and Michael Pelan (LaFarge) to discuss their public comments submitted to the 

CISWI docket.
#### § 129.24 Cockpit voice recorders.

No person may operate an aircraft under this part that is registered in the United States unless it is equipped with an approved cockpit voice recorder that meets the standards of TSO-C123a, or later revision. The cockpit voice recorder must record the information that would be required to be recorded if the aircraft were operated under part 121, 125, or 135 of this chapter, and must be installed by the compliance times required by that part, as applicable to the aircraft.

[Doc. No. FAA-2005-20245, 73 FR 12570, Mar. 7, 2008]
EXHIBIT XI
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Stephen M. Kasprisin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Naturade, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006              /s/ Stephen M. Kasprisin   Stephen M. Kasprisin   *Chief Financial Officer*   
54
Attachment 6

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24637-7 Filed:06/22/23 Entered:06/22/23 19:25:02 Desc:

Attachment 6 Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24637-7 Filed:06/22/23 Entered:06/22/23 19:25:02 Desc:

Attachment 6 Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24637-7 Filed:06/22/23 Entered:06/22/23 19:25:02 Desc:

Attachment 6 Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, John Hanna, Chief Executive Officer of The Fashion House Holdings, Inc., (the “Company”),certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Fashion House Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        *Date: December 30, 2005* */s/ John Hanna*   *By: John Hanna*   *Chief Executive Officer*
#### Debora Inez JACKSON *v.*Michael Wayne JACKSON

5-6151

489 S.W. 2d 805

Opinion delivered February 5, 1973

*R. Scott Campbell,*for appellant.

*George M. Callahan*and *Eudox Patterson,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

This is a child custody case arising out of a teenage marriage. At the time of the hearing appellant Debora Inez Jackson and appellee Michael Wayne Jackson were only 18, and the baby Ronald Wayne Jackson was nine months old. The Chancellor awarded the custody to the father on the conditions that he reside in his parents’ home and that Mrs. Cleo Jackson, the father’s mother cease her employment and take care of the child. Visitation was given to the mother in the home of the maternal grandparents each Saturday and Sunday. For reversal appellant contends:

> *922“I. Irrelevant testimony concerning Debora’s life before she married Michael was introduced into the record.

> II. Custody should not be awarded to a party who does not appear in court to testify.

> III. The evidence in this case indicates the child’s best interests would be served by allowing him to remain with his mother in the home of the maternal grandparents.

The record not only shows a number of indiscretions on the part of appellant but it also shows a history of discord between her and her parents. Prior to her marriage she was an accomplice to some overnight partying on the part of her 14 year old sister when their parents thought the sister was spending the night with a friend. After the birth of the child, and at a time when she was separated from her husband, she surreptitiously moved into the home of some acquaintances for a week or two. While there she expressed hatred for her parents.

Neither has appellee shown the utmost stability. However, he seems to have held a steady job. He has paid the bills, including the hospital bill, and furnished food and milk for the baby. That he offered to furnish clothing is not seriously disputed. In this respect, however, the proof is rather undisputed that he turned the money over to his mother to pay the bills and furnish the food.

On the whole record and in consideration of the fact that the Chancellor saw the witnesses, we cannot say that the Chancellor did not act in the best interest of the child in awarding the custody to the father and in placing the terms and conditions thereon.

The evidence about appellant’s life before she married was relevant to show the history of her parental attitudes.

The contention that custody should not be awarded to a party who does not appear in court to testify involves appellee’s father. We find no merit in this contention. *923Furthermore, Mr. Jackson was present in the court room and served as guardian and next of friend to appellee, a minor.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Mack I. Whittle,  Jr., Chief Executive  Officer of The South Financial Group,
Inc.  ("TSFG") certify that to the best of my knowledge,  based upon a review of
the  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30,  2004 of TSFG
(the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TSFG.


/s/ Mack I. Whittle, Jr.
---------------------------------
Mack I. Whittle, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
The South Financial Group, Inc.
August 6, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to The South  Financial  Group,  Inc.
and will be retained by The South  Financial  Group,  Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0679 Directorate Identifier: 2012

-NM

- 063

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Cond**  **ition Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be use d to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Fl exibility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
EY

BULLETIN 1030 PLATE 29

GEOLOGICAL. SURVE

EXPLANATION,
ra

odes

Vein, showing dip;
dashed where inferred

Shaft, going above
and Below level

a
Foot of raise

a
Head of winze

ribbing

Caved working.

ae iL

ve
n® \Quortz, sutides

Yeo’

Quortz, sulfides

427373 0-57 (In pocket)

Fracture zone, highly altered

5000 €

eerial Elev. 9,942'

ovne,

Monzonite

(Corbonates, quot

seve tues |

Stoped obi

xe Arcoed abot
a >: EA | sutces
2F“incccessiviey” Ds fae

Quartz, gelene

indicates basic facies

= wal rock

Heavy iron stain

f—Shear zone, much iron stain

Monzoaite

ff an

Monzonite
* 5
CARIBOU SHAFT
Im
mi: Quorte, sults
‘Stopedobove 7G lee
— "aI
ace @80y

Quorts, sulfides of? ts ‘ Yew

Tight tracture—-F795 Leopoer minerais prese
a Sopp Present stoped above

‘Quartz, sulfides

Geology by F.B. Moore and W.S, Cavender, 1981

fed Caribou Siver Mines, nc

{Base furnished by the Consol

50 9 200 Feet
enn ee

GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE 300 LEVEL, CARIBOU MINE, BOULDER COUNTY. COLORADO
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50133 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALBERTO SALAZAR-SIERRA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-508

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alberto SalazarSierra raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### § 121.381 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes airman and crewmember requirements for all certificate holders.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10423]



[[Page 24539]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33846]


Peter A. Gilbertson, et al., and SouthShore Corporation--Control 
Exemption--Illinois Indiana Development Company, LLC

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board grants an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502, from the 
prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323-25, for Peter A. 
Gilbertson, H. Terry Hearst, Bruce A. Lieberman, and SouthShore 
Corporation (collectively petitioners) to acquire control of Illinois 
Indiana Development Company, LLC (IIDC).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This proceeding is related to two concurrently filed notices 
of exemption in Illinois Indiana Development Company, LLC--
Acquisition and Operation Exemption--Norfolk Southern Railway 
Company, STB Finance Docket No. 33845 (STB served and published at 
65 FR 10149 on Feb. 25, 2000); and Chicago SouthShore & South Bend 
Railroad--Operation Exemption--Illinois Indiana Development Company, 
LLC, STB Finance Docket No. 33819 (STB served and published at 65 FR 
10148 on Feb. 25, 2000).

DATES: This exemption will be effective May 26, 2000. Petitions to stay 
must be filed by May 11, 2000, and petitions to reopen must be filed by 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
May 22, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send an original and 10 copies of pleadings referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33846 to: Surface Transportation Board, Office of 
the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20423-0001. In addition, send one copy of pleadings to petitioners' 
representative: Rose-Michele Weinryb, Weiner, Brodsky, Sidman & Kider, 
P.C., 1350 New York Ave., NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20005-4797.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 565-1600. [TDD for 
the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: Da-To-Da Office Solutions, 1925 K 
Street, NW., Suite 405, Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 466-
5530. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD 
Services 1-800-877-8339.]
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: April 19, 2000.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Burkes, and 
Commissioner Clyburn.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10423 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
§ 1216.102 Policy. NASA policy is to: ( a ) Use all practicable means, consistent with NASA's statutory authority, available resources, and the national policy, to protect and enhance the quality of the environment;
( b ) Provide for proper attention to and ensure that environmental amenities and values are given appropriate consideration in all NASA actions, including those performed under contract, grant, lease, or permit;
( c ) Recognize the worldwide and long-range character of environmental concerns and, when consistent with the foreign policy of the United States and its own responsibilities, lend appropriate support to initiatives, resolutions, and programs designed to maximize international cooperation in anticipating and preventing a decline in the quality of the world environment;
( d ) Use systematic and timely approaches which will ensure the integrated use of the natural and social sciences and environmental design arts in planning and decisionmaking for actions which may have an impact on the human environment;
( e ) Pursue research and development, within the scope of NASA's authority or in response to authorized agencies, for application of technologies useful in the protection and enhancement of environmental quality;
( f ) Initiate and utilize ecological and other environmental information in the planning and development of resource-oriented projects; and
( g ) Invite cooperation, where appropriate, from Federal, State, local, and regional authorities and the public in NASA planning and decisionmaking processes.