alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10827 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. JO SE A LV A R E Z- A C O ST A , al so know n as Jos e G uadal upe A l var ez - A c os t a D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 8 - CR- 1 0 0 - ALL B ef ore SM ITH , B E N AV ID E S , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ed era lP u b l i c D efen d er a p p oin ted to re p rese n t J ose A l va rez -A costa (A l varez) ha s m oved f or l eave to w i t h draw an d h as f i l ed a bri e f in a ccor da n ce w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif

o rn ia , 3 86 U . S . 7 38 ( 196 7) . A l varez h as n otfi l ed a respon se. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l os e s no n on frivo l ou s is s u e for ap p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rr e s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 16, 2 009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
The current Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act process is in conflict and insufficient

in protecting water quality of rivers and streams that are routinely comprised of significant
amounts of wastewater effluent or effluent dominated. The City of Thornton would encourage

EPA to either change the Clean Water Act or the Safe Drinking Water Act regulatory process to
address these conflicts regarding water quality standards compliance schedules. In addition EPA needs to develop criteria which define th e appropriate allocation of treatment cost between wastewater dischargers and drinking water suppliers and enhance the protection of public drinking water supplies.

Bud Hart

City of Thornton
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO

TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA

SALA SUPERIOR DE SAN JUAN

SISTEMA DE RETIRO DE LA

UNIVERSIDAD DE PUERTO RICO POR

CONDUCTO DE LA JUNTA DE RETIRO 

DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE PUERTO 

RICO;

Parte Demandante

vs.

UNIVERSIDAD DE PUERTO RICO POR

CONDUCTO DE LA JUNTA DE 

GOBIERNO DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE 

PUERTO RICO, CPA RICARDO DALMAU 

SANTANA, PRESIDENTE DE LA JUNTA 

DE GOBIERNO DE LA UNIVERSIDAD 

DE PUERTO RICO, ENTIDAD XYZ

Parte Demandada

CIVIL NÚM: SJ2023CV04406

SOBRE:

INTERDICTO PRELIMINAR Y

PERMANENTE, SENTENCIA

DECLARATORIA

MOCIÓN INFORMATIVA Y ANEJANDO EMPLAZAMIENTOS

AL HONORABLE TRIBUNAL:

COMPARECE la Parte Demandante de epígrafe, mediante la 

representación legal que suscribe, y muy respetuosamente EXPONE, ALEGA Y 

SOLICITA:

1. Por la presente se informa que el 16 de mayo de 2023, la parte Demandada

fue emplazada conforme a derecho. Véase Anejo 1.

POR TODO LO CUAL, muy respetuosamente se solicita de este Honorable 

Tribunal que tome conocimiento de lo antes expuesto y, en su consecuencia, 

incorpore el original del emplazamiento que se acompaña a los autos del presente 

caso.

RESPETUOSAMENTE SOMETIDO.

En Ponce, Puerto Rico, a 16 de mayo de 2023.

CERTIFICO que conforme lo establece la Guía del Usuario del Portal de 

SUMAC, la presentación electrónica de este escrito constituirá la notificación que 

debe efectuarse entre abogados y abogadas, según disponen las Reglas de 

Procedimiento Civil, a los abogados de récord registrados en dicho sistema 

electrónico.

SJ2023CV04406 16/05/2023 04:57:35 pm Entrada Núm. 10 Página 1 de 2 SJ2023CV04406 16/05/2023 04:57:48 pm Entrada Núm. 10 Página 1 de 2 Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-53 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Attachment to Informative Motion Dkt 10 Page 1 of 2
Sistema de Retiro de la UPR et al. v. UPR, et al.

Moción Informativa y Anejando Emplazamiento 2

2

472 Ave. Tito Castro

Edificio Marvesa, Suite 106

Ponce, Puerto Rico 00716

Tel: (787) 848-0666

Fax: (787) 841-1435

notificaciones@bufete-emmanuelli.com

f/ Rafael Maldonado Pérez

Lcdo. Rafael Maldonado Pérez

RUA:15717

PO Box 194669

San Juan, PR 00919

Tel. (787) 553-8293

Fax (787) 765-3043

Rmaldonadolaw@gmail.com

f/ Rolando Emmanuelli Jiménez

Lcdo. Rolando Emmanuelli Jiménez

RUA: 8509 CA: 9755

rolando@emmanuelli.law

f/ Jessica E. Méndez Colberg

Lcda. Jessica E. Méndez Colberg

RUA: 19,853 CA: 19,774

jessica@emmanuelli.law

f/ Zoé C. Negrón Comas

Lcda. Zoé C. Negrón Comas

RUA: 22,276 CA: 20935

zoe@emmanuelli.law

SJ2023CV04406 16/05/2023 04:57:35 pm Entrada Núm. 10 Página 2 de 2 SJ2023CV04406 16/05/2023 04:57:48 pm Entrada Núm. 10 Página 2 de 2 Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-53 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Attachment to Informative Motion Dkt 10 Page 2 of 2
36 31 36 31 36 31 36

01 06 01 06 01 06 01

u So th Wi ow re

S

ll C e

o

k

uth

Willow

Creek

Go

36 31 36 31 lf C

36 31 £¤ 36 ourse Road

01 06 01 06 01 06 06 01

Pole Cre

Horsethief

e

R

k

oad

Roundup eek thief Cr rse Ho

Cameron Creek

Johnson Road £¤ 36 31 £¤ 36 31 31 36 31 36

Cu rant Creek nt Cr

r

Curra

01 06 01 06 06 01 06 01

Horsethief Extensive Recreation 

Management Area

Alternatives A and B

R23E

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

Miles

Map 97

Wyoming

T Lake Mason 9

National Wildlife N

Refuge

T

8

N

T

7

N

R24E R25E

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Map scale 1:165,000

Ü Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

87

12

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

Horsethief ERMA

Roads

Streams

Division of State Lands

US Fish and Wildlife Service

Private

87

Public Lands Survey System

Water

Bureau of Land Management
121 STAT. 566 PUBLIC LAW 110–63—AUG. 9, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1617: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

May 14, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–63 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 561 Kingsland 

Avenue in University City, Missouri, as the ‘‘Harriett F. Woods Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. HARRIETT F. WOODS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 561 Kingsland Avenue in University City, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Harriett F. Woods 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Harriett F. Woods Post Office Building’’. 

Approved August 9, 2007. 

Aug. 9, 2007 

[H.R. 1617]
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 8:06 AM 

To: Alex Hofmann; Andrew Delaski; Aris Marantan; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Saint; Bob Smith; Brenda 

Edwards; Brian Coffey; Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Gaytan; Caskey, John; Charlie Drexler; Charlie Stevens; 

Chris Bolduc; Chris Brown; Clark Silcox; Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; David Flaten; Emily 

Marchetti; Eric Peterson; Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Coulter; Greg Rosenquist; Hirsch, 

Bruce R; James Lass; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Corkran; Jerry Hodge; Jerry Schoen; Jim Raba; Joanna 

Mauer; John Cymbalsky; John Rossetti; Katie Coughlin; Ken Winder; Mahesh P. Sampat; Matthew 

Nardotti; Maxine Savitz; Meg Waltner; Meyers, Aaron; Michael Hyland; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; 

Pamela Costello; Phil Harter; Phil Hopkinson; Polinski, Raymond; Puesh Kumar; Richard W. Parker; Rick 

Anderson; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; 

Simmons, Chuck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Ted Johnstone; Thomas Petrosino; Tim Ballo; Tom 

Eckman; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo 

Subject: Today's Conference Call on Medium-Voltage Transformers 

Dear Colleagues, 

As you know, today's conference call is the last scheduled event of our negotiated rulemaking 

process on medium-voltage transformers. It is scheduled to run from 11 am to 1 pm, though we 

will end sooner if we finish our business sooner. 

I propose that we use the time to do two things: 

1) See if we can get to yes on an EL to recommend for DL 12, thereby creating a clear 

foundation an agreement on MVDT. 

I propose to focus on DL 12 because DLs 9, 10, and 11 are very small in sales (about 5 % of the 

market combined). E.g., 135 DL 11 units shipped in in 2009, whereas 1936 DL 12 units were 

sold. 

Also, these other DLs should scale off of DL 12, except for the low kVA portion (< 300 KvA) of 

DL 11 which is even smaller. DL 13 is a high-BIL version of DL 12 (and the upper end of 

DL11) and also can be treated as variant of DL12. Adjustment factors for DLs 9, 10, 11 and 13 

have been proposed by NEMA, but I would suggest that these can be treated separately as part of 

a technical exercise, that we can discuss if we can get to yes on the big issue, which is DL 12 

2) Discuss next steps, if any, for this group on liquid-filled transformers. 

Attached for your review is a chart containing the key LCC information for DL 12, with 2010 

price results and 2011 price results displayed side-by-side for ease of reference. Also attached 

are the full LBL and Engineering Analysis results for both 2010 prices and 2011 prices. 2011 

prices are what were are focusing on, but 2010 prices offers a useful reference (sensitivity if you 

will). 

I look forward to talking with you at 11. This will be a time for bottom lines. We know the 

arguments. 
Best, 

Richard Parker 

Facilitator
#### § 615.5170 Real and personal property.

Real estate and personal property may be acquired, held, or disposed of by any Farm Credit institution for the necessary and normal operations of its business. The purchase, lease, or construction of office quarters shall be limited to facilities reasonably necessary to meet the foreseeable requirements of the institution. Property shall not be acquired if it involves, or appears to involve, a bank or association in the real estate or other unrelated business.

[50 FR 48554, Nov. 26, 1985. Redesignated at 58 FR 63056, Nov. 30, 1993, and amended at 60 FR 20011, Apr. 24, 1995]
§ 1221.101 Policy. ( a ) The NASA Seal, the NASA Insignia, NASA Logotype, NASA Program Identifiers, the NASA Flags, and the Agency's Unified Visual Communications System, as prescribed in § 1221.102 through § 1221.108 of this subpart, shall be used exclusively to represent NASA, its programs, projects, functions, activities, or elements. The use of any devices other than those provided by or subsequently approved in accordance with the provisions of this subpart is prohibited.
( b ) The use of the devices prescribed in this section shall be governed by the provisions of this subpart. The use of the devices prescribed in this section for any purpose other than as authorized by this subpart is prohibited. Their misuse shall be subject to the penalties authorized by statute, as set forth in § 1221.115 and shall be reported as provided in § 1221.116.
( c ) Any proposal for a new NASA Insignia, NASA Logotype, NASA Program Identifier, or for modification to those prescribed in this section shall be processed in accordance with § 1221.114.
#### ENGLERT MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. H-180.

Decided June 5, 1933]

*Mr. George M. Morris*for the plaintiff. *Mr. Marry 0. Kimie and KixMiller, Baar <db Morris*were on the brief.

*Mr. Ralph G.*Williamson, with whom was *Mr. W. W. Beott,*for the defendant.

*58Williams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The plaintiff, a manufacturer of electric storage batteries, brings suit to recover the sum of $10,121.94, together with interest thereon, excise taxes paid upon the sale of such batteries for the period between May 12, 1921, and March 31, 1926.

The taxes were imposed and collected under Sections 900 of the Revenue Acts of 1918 (c. 18, 40 Stat. 1122) and 1921 (c. 136, 42 Stat. 291), and Section 600 of the Revenue Act of 1924 (c. 234, 43 Stat. 253).

Timely claims for refund of the taxes were filed by plaintiff, and were disallowed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue on the sole ground that storage batteries constitute automobile parts within the meaning of the taxing statutes. The suit was timely instituted.

The sole issue presented is: Were the storage batteries involved automobile “ parts ” within the meaning of the statutes ?

The facts disclosed by the findings are parallel to the facts in *General Lead Batteries Co.*v. *United*States, 75 C.Cls. 605; *U.S. Light & Heat Corporation*v. *United*States, ante, p. 23; *M. & M. Company*v. *United*States, *post,*p. 59, and *Universal Battery Co.*v. *United*States, ante, p. 1. The *59taxed batteries in this case are the same type as those in the cases referred to, and were sold and used for substantially the same variety of purposes. While the chief nonautomotive use and sale of the batteries in the instant case were in the radio field they were sold and used for over thirty different purposes other than in automobiles, and were just as, adaptable for these uses as they were for use in automobiles..

Under the rule announced in the cases cited articles equally adapted to a variety of uses and commonly put to such uses, one of which is use in motor vehicles, may not be-classed as “ parts ” for automobiles. See *Universal Battery Co.*v. *United*States, 281 U.S. 580, *Routzahn, Coll.,*v. *Willard Storage Battery Co.,*C.C.A., 65 Fed. (2d) 89, and *McCaughn, Coll.,*v. *Electric Storage Battery Co.,*C.C.A., 63 Fed. (2d) *715.*

The plaintiff is clearly entitled to recover. Judgment is therefore ■ awarded the plaintiff in the sum of $10,121.94,. with interest as provided by law.

Whaley, *Judge;*Littleton, *Judge;*and Giieen, *Judge,.*concur.

Booth, *Ohief Justice,*did not hear this case, on account of illness, and took no part in its decision.
§ 125.249 Maintenance manual requirements. ( a ) Each certificate holder's manual required by § 125.71 of this part shall contain, in addition to the items required by § 125.73 of this part, at least the following: ( 1 ) A description of the certificate holders maintenance organization, when the certificate holder has such an organization.
( 2 ) A list of those persons with whom the certificate holder has arranged for performance of inspections under this part. The list shall include the persons' names and addresses.
( 3 ) The inspection programs required by § 125.247 of this part to be followed in the performance of inspections under this part including— ( i ) The method of performing routine and nonroutine inspections (other than required inspections);
( ii ) The designation of the items that must be inspected (required inspections), including at least those which if improperly accomplished could result in a failure, malfunction, or defect endangering the safe operation of the airplane;
( iii ) The method of performing required inspections;
( iv ) Procedures for the inspection of work performed under previously required inspection findings (“buy-back procedures”);
( v ) Procedures, standards, and limits necessary for required inspections and acceptance or rejection of the items required to be inspected;
( vi ) Instructions to prevent any person who performs any item of work from performing any required inspection of that work; and
( vii ) Procedures to ensure that work interruptions do not adversely affect required inspections and to ensure required inspections are properly completed before the airplane is released to service.
( b ) In addition, each certificate holder's manual shall contain a suitable system which may include a coded system that provides for the retention of the following: ( 1 ) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work performed.
( 2 ) The name of the person performing the work and the person's certificate type and number.
( 3 ) The name of the person approving the work and the person's certificate type and number.
§ 1253.115 Assurance required. ( a ) *General.* Either at the application stage or the award stage, Federal agencies must ensure that applications for Federal financial assistance or awards of Federal financial assistance contain, be accompanied by, or be covered by a specifically identified assurance from the applicant or recipient, satisfactory to the designated agency official, that each education program or activity operated by the applicant or recipient and to which these Title IX regulations apply will be operated in compliance with these Title IX regulations. An assurance of compliance with these Title IX regulations shall not be satisfactory to the designated agency official if the applicant or recipient to whom such assurance applies fails to commit itself to take whatever remedial action is necessary in accordance with § 1253.110(a) to eliminate existing discrimination on the basis of sex or to eliminate the effects of past discrimination whether occurring prior to or subsequent to the submission to the designated agency official of such assurance.
( b ) *Duration of obligation.* ( 1 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide real property or structures thereon, such assurance shall obligate the recipient or, in the case of a subsequent transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structures are used to provide an education program or activity.
( 2 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide personal property, such assurance shall obligate the recipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property.
( 3 ) In all other cases such assurance shall obligate the recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended.
( c ) *Form.* ( 1 ) The assurances required by paragraph (a) of this section, which may be included as part of a document that addresses other assurances or obligations, shall include that the applicant or recipient will comply with all applicable Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683, 1685-1688).
( 2 ) The designated agency official will specify the extent to which such assurances will be required of the applicant's or recipient's subgrantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, or successors in interest.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7185
TERRY ALLEN ALSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
No. 98-7458
TERRY ALLEN ALSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-97-699-2, CA-97-1027-2)2 Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 19, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Allen Alston, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Terry Allen Alston appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his petitions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions accepting the reports and recommendations of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See Alston v. Angelone, Nos. CA97-699-2; CA-97-1027-2 (E.D. Va. July 28 & Sept. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1215.103 Services. ( a ) *Standard services.* These are services which TDRSS is capable of providing to low-Earth orbital user spacecraft or other terrestrial users. Data are delivered to WSC or GRGT. A detailed description of services is provided in the GSFC Near Space Network Users' Guide, 450-NSNUG. Contact the Chief, Commercialization, Innovation, and Synergies, at the address in Section 1215.108(d) to obtain a copy of the NSNUG. ( 1 ) Tracking service.
( 2 ) Data acquisition service.
( 3 ) Command transmission service.
( b ) *Required Support Services.* These are support activities that are required to obtain TDRSS services. ( 1 ) Prelaunch support planning, analysis, and documentation.
( 2 ) Compatibility testing.
( 3 ) Prelaunch support for data-flow testing and related activities.
( 4 ) User services scheduling.
( c ) *Mission-unique services.* Other tracking and data services desired by the user that are beyond the standard and required support services defined above. The associated charges for these services will be identified and assessed on a case-by-case basis.
[77 FR 6952, Feb. 10, 2012, as amended at 86 FR 60566, Nov. 3, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 797978
<NAME> FFCA INVESTOR SERVICES CORPORATION 86-B
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>