alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  | (a) | The                    quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January                    31, 2008 of                    the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                    or 15(b)                    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | Information                contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Daniel S. Laikin |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel S. Laikin                    |   |
| Chief Executive Officer             |   |

| /s/                  Lorraine Evanoff |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Lorraine Evanoff                      |   |
| Interim Chief Financial Officer       |   |
§ 121.570 Airplane evacuation capability. ( a ) No person may cause an airplane carrying passengers to be moved on the surface, take off, or land unless each automatically deployable emergency evacuation assisting means, installed pursuant to § 121.310(a), is ready for evacuation.
( b ) Each certificate holder shall ensure that, at all times passengers are on board prior to airplane movement on the surface, at least one floor-level exit provides for the egress of passengers through normal or emergency means.
[Doc. No. 26142, 57 FR 42674, Sept. 15, 1992]
EXHIBIT
10.3





NOTICE OF
SECURITY INTEREST IN


AND COLLATERAL
ASSIGNMENT OF COPYRIGHTS





NOTICE IS
HEREBY GIVEN that 301 PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation, (the "Grantor") with office
located at 8228 Sunset Boulevard, 3rd
Floor, Los Angeles, California 90046, and VS INVESTMENT B, LLC ("Secured Party") with
an address at 1829 N. Orleans St., Chicago, IL 60614have entered into a Security
Agreement dated as of November 7, 2008 (the "Security
Agreement"-).








To secure
the Obligations described in the Security Agreement, Grantor grants and pledges
to Secured Party a security interest in all of Grantor's right, title and
interest in, to and under all Copyrights, whether now owned by or owing to, or
hereafter acquired by or arising in favor of Grantor including without
limitation all Copyrights listed on Schedule A, all Products related thereto,
and including without limitation all proceeds thereof (such as, by way of
example but not by way of limitation, license royalties and proceeds of
infringement suits), the right to sue for past, present and future
infringements, all rights corresponding thereto throughout the world and all
re-issues, divisions continuations, renewals, extensions and
continuations-in-part thereof.





This
security interest is granted in conjunction with the security interest granted
to Secured Party under the Security Agreement. The rights and remedies of
Secured Party with respect to the security interest granted hereby are in
addition to those set forth in the Security Agreement, and those which are now
or hereafter available to Secured Party as a matter of law or
equity.





Each
right, power and remedy of Secured Party provided for herein or in the Security
Agreement, or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity shall be cumulative
and concurrent and shall be in addition to every right, power or remedy provided
for herein and the exercise by Secured Party of any one or more of the rights,
powers or remedies provided for in this Notice and Assignment or the Security
Agreement, or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity, shall not preclude
the simultaneous or later exercise by Secured Party, of any or all other rights,
powers or remedies.







Dated:
November 7, 2008



















GRANTOR:
                
                301 PRODUCTIONS,
      INC.By:
              /s/ 
      Daniel S. LaikinName:
      Daniel S LaikinTitle:
      CEO and President








1








Schedule
A





Intellectual
Property





301 PRODUCTIONS, INC.
SCHEDULE OF REGISTERED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS













Federal Copyright
Registrations:





Registration
Number PAu 3-358-000, "The Legend of Awesomest Maximus," dated August 14, 2008;
Author: Jason Burinescu; Claimant: 301 Productions, Inc., (copy of certificate
of registration attached).





2
§ 121.555 Compliance with approved routes and limitations: Domestic and flag operations. No pilot may operate an airplane in scheduled air transportation— ( a ) Over any route or route segment unless it is specified in the certificate holder's operations specifications; or
( b ) Other than in accordance with the limitations in the operations specifications.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19219, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2614, Jan. 26, 1996]
#### § 135.78 Instrument approach procedures and IFR landing minimums.

No person may make an instrument approach at an airport except in accordance with IFR weather minimums and instrument approach procedures set forth in the certificate holder's operations specifications.

[Doc. No. FAA-2002-14002, 72 FR 31684, June 7, 2007]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24513-24514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10502]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: National Science Foundation, National Science 
Board.

DATE AND TIME:   
May 3, 2000, 1 p.m.-1:30 p.m.: Closed Session
May 4, 2000, 11:30 a.m.-12:15 p.m.: Open Session
May 4, 2000, 1:30 p.m.-2 p.m.: Closed Session
May 4, 2000, 2 p.m.-5 p.m.: Open Session

PLACE: The National Science Foundation, Room 1235, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

STATUS:   
    Part of this meeting will be closed to the public. Part of this 
meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   

Wednesday, May 3

Closed Session  (1 p.m.-1:30 p.m.)

Closed Session  Minutes, March 2000
NSB Elections

Thursday, May 4

Open Session  (11:30 a.m.-12:15 p.m.)

Presentation, Dr. Michael Turner, University of Chicago

Closed Session  (1:30 p.m.-2 p.m.)

NSF Budget

[[Page 24514]]

Open Session  (2 p.m.-5 p.m.)

Open Session Minutes, March 2000
Closed Session Items for August 2000
Chairman's Report
Director's Report
Executive Committee Annual Report
NSB 2001 Calendar
Committee Reports
Director's 1999 Merit Review Report
NSB Report on Communication and Outreach
NSF Budget and Planning
National S&E Infrastructure

Marta Cehelsky,
Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10502 Filed 4-24-00; 12:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10222]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Network Reliability and Interoperability Council

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this 
notice advises interested persons of the second meeting of the Network 
Reliability and Interoperability Council (Council) under its charter 
renewed as of January 6, 2000. The meeting will be held at the Federal 
Communications Commission in Washington, DC.

DATES: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 at 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. SW., Room 
TW-C305, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kent R. Nilsson at 202-418-0845 or TTY 
202-418-2989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council was established by the Federal 
Communications Commission to bring together leaders of the 
telecommunications industry and telecommunications experts from 
academic, consumer and other organizations to explore and recommend 
measures that would enhance network reliability. The Council will 
receive reports on and discuss the progress of its three focus groups: 
Y2K, Network Reliability, and Interoperability. The Council may also 
discuss such other matters as come before it at the meeting. Members of 
the general public may attend the meeting. The Federal Communications 
Commission will attempt to accommodate as many people as possible. 
Admittance, however, will be limited to the seating available. The 
public may submit written comments before the meeting to Kent Nilsson, 
the Commission's Designated Federal Officer for the Network Reliability 
and Interoperability Council, by email (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d8939691948b8b9796989e9b9bf69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9dd6d3d4d1ceced2d3dddbdedeb3dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>) or U.S. mail 
(7-B452, 445 12th St. SW., Washington, DC 20554). Real Audio and 
streaming video Access to the meeting will be available at http://www.fcc.gov/.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10222 Filed 4-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Southern Express Co. *v.*The State.

*Seizure of Liquors.*

(Decided June 3, 1914.

65 South. 844.)

*Appeal and Error; Record; Revieio; Questions Presented.*— An agreed statement of facts which was not incorporated in a bill of exceptions, and which the record did not Show was used upon the trial, cannot be accepted on appeal as a substitute for a bill of exceptions, so as to authorize an appellate court to review the findings of the trial court on the facts. (Sections 8018,- 5361. Code 1907.)

Appeal from Walker Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. T. L. Sowell.

The state seized certain liquors, to which the Southern Express Company propounded its claim. From a judgment denying the claim and condemning the liquors the Southern Express Company appeals.

Affirmed-

. Bankhead & Bankhead, for appellant.

No brief' reached the Reporter.

Robert C. Brickell, Attorney General and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

WALKER, P. J.

The appeal is from a judgment rendered by the court sitting without a jury whereby certain liquors seized under a search warrant were forfeited and ordered to be destroyed, together with the-vessels in which the same were contained. The affidavit under Avhich the search warrant was issued stated-facts constituting a ground for issuing such a process-—Acts of Ala. 1909, pp. 63, 76, § 22, subd. 6a. The appellant interposed a verified claim to the liquors seized, by which it controverted the existence of the grounds *656stated in the affidavit upon which the search warrant was issued. The judgment recites that:

> “After hearing the evidence in said cause, it is the judgment of the court that the complainant, has established a ground for the issuance of such warrant.”

The record does not contain a bill of exceptions. There is set out in the transcript a written instrument signed by the attorneys of the respective parties, which .states that:

> “It is agreed that the facts stated in the claim propounded by the Southern Express Company are true as therein stated.”

The record does not show that the case was tried upon this agreed statement of facts. No reference to it is made in the judgment. It is not made to appear that it was ever called to the attention of the trial court. A bill of exceptions is required to present for review on appeal the conclusion and judgment of the court on the evidence in a case tried without a jury. — Code, § 5361; *Alosi v. Birmingham Waterworks Co.,*1 Ala. App. 630, 55 South. 1029; *Williams, Adm’r, v. Woodward Iron Co.,*106 Ala. 254, 17 South. 517. The agreement of parties found in the transcript cannot be treated as a substitute for a bill of exceptions. Even if it showed more than this one does, it would not be a part of the record, as it lacks the authentication furnished by the signature of the presiding judge. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, properly signed by the presiding judge in the manner prescribed by statute, we cannot review the ruling *made.*— Clark *v. McCrary,*80 Ala. 110; *Southern Express Co. v. Black,*54 Ala. 177; *Kerley v. Vann,*52 Ala. 7; Code, § 3018.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officerof the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/    LEO F. WELLS,III                                                               |   |   |        |
| **Leo F. Wells, III****Chief Executive Officer****November 13, 2002**   
 

20
  |
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-11193

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JASON DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00103-SDM-JSS-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 21-11193 Date Filed: 11/04/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-11193

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant 

to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is 

GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–

51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it 

was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Weaver, 

275 F.3d 1320, 1333 (11th Cir. 2001) (sentence appeal waiver was 

enforceable when district court “referenced” waiver provision during plea colloquy and defendant confirmed he understood the 

waiver provision and entered into it voluntarily and freely); United 

States v. Boyd, 975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th Cir. 2020) (sentence appeal waiver was enforceable when district court clearly conveyed 

that defendant was giving up right to appeal under most circumstances and when defendant initialed and signed plea agreement 

and confirmed that he read and discussed plea agreement with his 

counsel and that he understood the terms).

USCA11 Case: 21-11193 Date Filed: 11/04/2021 Page: 2 of 2
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3544

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility 

of designating certain lands along the southern coast of Maui, Hawaii, 

as a unit of the National Park System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2003

Mr. CASE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability 

and feasibility of designating certain lands along the 

southern coast of Maui, Hawaii, as a unit of the National 

Park System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SOUTH MAUI COASTAL STUDY. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘South Maui Coastal Preservation Act of 2003’’. 

6 (b) STUDY.—

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Inte8 rior shall complete a study to determine the suit-
2

•HR 3544 IH 

1 ability and feasibility of designating certain lands lo2 cated on the southern coast of Maui, Hawaii, as a 

3 National Seashore, National Recreation Area, Na4 tional Monument, National Preserve, or other unit 

5 of the National Park System. 

6 (2) STUDY AREA.—The study area shall extend 

7 generally from and including the Ahihi-Kinau Nat8 ural Area Reserve to Kanaloa Point. 

9 (3) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER LAW.—Para10 graphs (2) and (3) of section 8(c) of Public Law 91–

11 383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)(2) and (3); commonly known 

12 as the National Park System General Authorities 

13 Act) shall apply to the study. 

14 (4) CONSULTATION.—The study shall include 

15 an assessment of the possibility of transferring some 

16 or all of the State lands in the study area to the 

17 Federal Government based on consultations with the 

18 State of Hawaii. 

19 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after funds 

20 are made available for this section, the Secretary of the 

21 Interior shall transmit to the Committee on Resources of 

22 the House of Representatives and the Committee on En23 ergy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report con-
3

•HR 3544 IH 

1 taining the conclusions of the study required by subsection 

2 (b).

Æ
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24429 Filed:06/02/23 Entered:06/06/23 16:51:55 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24429 Filed:06/02/23 Entered:06/06/23 16:51:55 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24429 Filed:06/02/23 Entered:06/06/23 16:51:55 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24429 Filed:06/02/23 Entered:06/06/23 16:51:55 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 4
§ 135.431 Continuing analysis and surveillance. ( a ) Each certificate holder shall establish and maintain a system for the continuing analysis and surveillance of the performance and effectiveness of its inspection program and the program covering other maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations and for the correction of any deficiency in those programs, regardless of whether those programs are carried out by the certificate holder or by another person.
( b ) Whenever the Administrator finds that either or both of the programs described in paragraph (a) of this section does not contain adequate procedures and standards to meet this part, the certificate holder shall, after notification by the Administrator, make changes in those programs requested by the Administrator.
( c ) A certificate holder may petition the Administrator to reconsider the notice to make a change in a program. The petition must be filed with the responsible Flight Standards office within 30 days after the certificate holder receives the notice. Except in the case of an emergency requiring immediate action in the interest of safety, the filing of the petition stays the notice pending a decision by the Administrator.
[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-60, 61 FR 2617, Jan. 26, 1996; Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 135-139, 83 FR 9175, Mar. 5, 2018]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3788 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in the 

maximum amount of grants awarded by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

to States and tribal organizations for operating and maintaining veterans’ 

cemeteries, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2020 

Mr. TESTER (for himself, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. REED, and Mr. HOEVEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an 

increase in the maximum amount of grants awarded 

by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to States and tribal 

organizations for operating and maintaining veterans’ 

cemeteries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Cemetery 

5 Grants Improvement Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3788 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF GRANTS 

2 AWARDED BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

3 AFFAIRS TO STATES AND TRIBAL ORGANIZA4 TIONS FOR OPERATING AND MAINTAINING 

5 VETERANS’ CEMETERIES. 

6 Section 2408(e)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 

7 is amended by striking ‘‘$5,000,000’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3876 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3876

To make a technical correction relating to the treatment of refunds of 
   merchandise processing fees under the United States-Mexico-Canada 
                     Agreement Implementation Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 3, 2020

 Mr. Scott of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make a technical correction relating to the treatment of refunds of 
   merchandise processing fees under the United States-Mexico-Canada 
                     Agreement Implementation Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION RELATING TO REFUNDS OF MERCHANDISE 
              PROCESSING FEES.

    (a) Reliquidation of Entries.--Section 205(a)(1) of the United 
States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act (Public Law 116-113) 
is amended by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the following:
                    ``(C) by striking `for which' and inserting `, or 
                section 202 of the United States-Mexico-Canada 
                Agreement Implementation Act, for which'; and''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the United States-
Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act.
                                 <all>
```