alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                                PLEDGE AMENDMENT
                                ----------------


     This Pledge Amendment, dated as of April 13, 2001 is delivered pursuant to
Section 6(d) of the Pledge Agreement referred to below. The undersigned hereby
agrees that this Pledge Amendment may be attached to that certain Pledge
Agreement, dated October 31, 2000 by the undersigned, as Pledgor, to General
Electric Capital Corporation, individually and as Agent for the Lenders, and
that the Pledged Shares listed on this Pledge Amendment shall be and become a
part of the Pledged Collateral referred to in said Pledge Agreement and shall
secure all Secured Obligations referred to in said Pledge Agreement.

                            WWT, INC.

                            By:    /s/ Peter G. Michielutti
                               ------------------------------------------

                            Name:  Peter G. Michielutti
                                 ----------------------------------------

                            Title: Senior Vice President and Chief
                                   Financial Officer
                                  ---------------------------------------


    Name and                              Class       Certificate      Number
Address of Pledgor   Issuer              of Stock      Number(s)     of Shares
------------------   ------              --------     -----------    ---------
WWT, Inc.            Bentley's Luggage   Common            2           1,000
                     Corp.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Knight Trading Group, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John B. Howard, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (3) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JOHN B. HOWARDName: John B. Howard Title:   Chief Financial Officer Date:   March 15, 2005




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2015

- 8135

Directorate Identifier: 2015NM106AD

767

- 25

- 0548

--- 11/5/2014

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

### except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.36.1

                                 TERMINATION OF
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, effective as of May 15, 2001, is
between APERIAN, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and KEVIN CRAIG
("Craig").

The Company and Craig are parties to an Employment Agreement effective April 6,
2001 under which the Company agreed to employ Craig as President and Co-Chief
Executive Officer. Craig has informed the Company that he wishes to terminate
the Employment Agreement and to remain employed as an employee-at-will at the
discretion of the Board of Directors.

Accordingly, Craig and the Company agree as follows:

1. The Employment Agreement is terminated as of May 15, 2001. Craig shall
continue as an employee of the Company in his current positions, to serve at the
discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company.

2. As of May 15, 2001, Craig's annual salary shall be $100,000. The amount of
Craig's salary, and any other compensation payable to Craig, shall be determined
and may be modified form time to time by the Board of Directors.

Dated: June 8, 2001

APERIAN, INC.



By    /s/ Peter E. Lorenzen
      Peter Lorenzen
      Vice President and Secretary



      /s/ Kevin Craig
      Kevin Craig
#### COMSTOCK V. JAHANT HEATING CO.

(Decided January 13, 1914.)

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. E. C. Crowe.

C. D. Comstock, for appellant. Thompson & Thompson, and Guy M.. Thompson, for appellee.

*664Pelham, J.

There is no such insistence upon errors assigned as to require consideration.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6922

CURTIS LAMONT SMITH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JAMES FRENCH, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-97-890-5-F)

Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: February 10, 1999

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Lamont Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Smith v. French, No. CA-97-890-5-F

(E.D.N.C. June 9, 1998). We deny Smith’s motion for appointed

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1300.23 Participation in guaranteed loans. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, a lender may distribute the risk of a portion of a loan guaranteed under the program by sale of participations therein if: ( 1 ) Neither the loan note nor the guarantee is assigned, conveyed, sold, or transferred in whole or in part;
( 2 ) The lender remains solely responsible for the administration of the loan; and
( 3 ) The Board's ability to assert any and all defenses available to it under the guarantee and the law is not adversely affected.
( b ) The following categories of entities may purchase participations in loans guaranteed under the program: ( 1 ) Eligible lenders;
( 2 ) Private investment funds and insurance companies that do not usually invest in commercial loans;
( 3 ) Air Carrier company suppliers or customers, who are interested in participating as a means of commencing or solidifying the supplier or customer relationship with the borrower; or
( 4 ) Any other entity approved by the Board on a case-by-case basis.
#### WINCHESTER MANUFACTURING CO. v. UNITED STATES

[75 C.Cls. 710; 290 U.S. 628]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court October 9, 1933.
# Official Journal C 175/7 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 175 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 477 July 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 175

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 477 July 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 175/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 175/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3496 — TNT FORWARDING HOLDING AB / WILSON LOGISTICS HOLDING AB) (1) | 2 |
| 2004/C 175/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3468 — DOW CHEMICALS / PIC / PLANET JV) (1) | 3 |
| 2004/C 175/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3048 — SUOMEN REHU OY / KEMIRA AGRO OY / HANKKIJA-MAATALOUS OY / MOVERE OY) (1) | 4 |
| 2004/C 175/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3425 — NORDIC CAPITAL / TRENOR) (1) | 5 |
| 2004/C 175/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3424 — CIBA / RAISIO CHEMICALS) (1) | 6 |
| 2004/C 175/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3435 — LYONDELL / MILLENNIUM) (1) | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 175/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 175/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3496 — TNT FORWARDING HOLDING AB / WILSON LOGISTICS HOLDING AB) (1)

2

2004/C 175/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3468 — DOW CHEMICALS / PIC / PLANET JV) (1)

3

2004/C 175/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3048 — SUOMEN REHU OY / KEMIRA AGRO OY / HANKKIJA-MAATALOUS OY / MOVERE OY) (1)

4

2004/C 175/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3425 — NORDIC CAPITAL / TRENOR) (1)

5

2004/C 175/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3424 — CIBA / RAISIO CHEMICALS) (1)

6

2004/C 175/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3435 — LYONDELL / MILLENNIUM) (1)

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>            Canadian dollars

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAY-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.474
<CASH>                                      1,192,715
<SECURITIES>                                1,215,461
<RECEIVABLES>                               3,203,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                   63,000
<INVENTORY>                                   263,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            6,541,873
<PP&E>                                      5,374,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             15,566,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,045,279
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    10,917
<COMMON>                                      162,824
<OTHER-SE>                                 10,889,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               15,566,819
<SALES>                                    10,588,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           10,588,401
<CGS>                                       3,823,348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,823,348
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            155,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               215,633
<INCOME-TAX>                                  254,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           233,176
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   30,432
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.01



</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3834 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to provide estimates of the use 

of taxpayer funds by the United States Government, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2020 

Mr. BRAUN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to provide estimates 

of the use of taxpayer funds by the United States Government, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF TAXPAYER FUNDS. 

4 The Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary’s del5 egate, shall provide, to each individual filing a Federal in6 come tax return for a calendar year, a one-page estimate 

7 of how the taxpayer’s money was spent by the Government 

8 during the immediately preceding calendar year. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership Certification of Periodic Financial Report
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officers of Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership (the Partnership)
certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal period ending March
31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information obtained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date
    
    05/16/05
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jeffrey S. YagerJeffrey S. YagerDate
    
    05/16/05
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Thomas K. EmeryThomas K. Emery
#### § 1204.1600 Issuance of motor vehicle for home-to-work.

When a NASA employee on temporary duty travel is authorized to travel by Government motor vehicle and the official authorizing the travel determines that there will be a significant savings in time, a Government motor vehicle may be issued at the close of the preceding working day and taken to the employee's residence prior to the commencement of official travel. Similarly, when a NASA employee is scheduled to return from temporary duty travel after the close of working hours and the official authorizing the travel determines that there will be a significant savings in time, the motor vehicle may be taken to the employee's residence and returned the next regular working day.

[68 FR 60847, Oct. 24, 2003]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00224

- CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND DISABILITY SERVICES

dba San Antonio State Supported Living Center,

Appellant

v.

Adrian COMER

, Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI12399

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we reve rse the trial court’s order and

dismiss Appellee Adrian Comer’s suit against Appellant Texas Department of Aging and

Disability Services for want of jurisdiction. We tax costs of this appeal against Appellee Adrian

Comer.

SIGNED January 24, 2018.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
#### WARREN STEAM PUMP COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. L-32.

Decided February 5, 1934]

*Mr. M. Manning Marcus*for the plaintiff. *Mr. Merrill 8. June*was on the brief.

*Mr. J. H.*Sheppard, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frank J.*Wideman, for the defendant. *Mr. G. H. Foster*was on the brief.

*754Green, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case is one in which plaintiff brings suit on an account stated in the form of a certificate of overassessment, which showed that an overassessment had been made, that part of it was credited on additional taxes for other years and $87,816.55 refundable, which was accordingly paid to plaintiff and accepted by it without any complaint until some four years afterwards.

Instead of an account stated, these facts would seem to show an account settled when the refund was made and interest also paid. However this may be, it is quite evident that there was no account stated showing a balance in favor of plaintiff after the payment of the refund and that consequently no right of action accrued to plaintiff thereon. Under the rules laid down in the cases of *R. H. Stearns Co.*v. *United*States, 291 U.S. 54; *Leisenring*v. *United*States, *ante,*p. 171; and *Samuel Daube*v. *United*States, this day decided by this court, post, p. 754, the petition must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Whalet, *Judge;*Williams, *Judge;*and Booth, *Chief*Justice, concur.

LittletoN, Judge, dissents.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                        ------------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-63080, 333-51504, 333-44418, 333-40476,
333-36228, 333-95933, 333-95279, 333-87553) and on From S-3 (Nos. 333-39958,
333-38006, 333-38000, 333-36382) of Critical Path, Inc. of our report dated
February 5, 2002 relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears on this Form 10-K.



San Jose, CA
March 29, 2002
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Mark Ferrer, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A ofCritical Path, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstance under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 16, 2004         /s/MARK FERRER   Mark Ferrer  Chief Executive Officer  
130
# Official Journal C 224/8 Se

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 224 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 478 September 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 224

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 478 September 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 224/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 224/2 | Binding tariff information | 2 |
| 2004/C 224/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3540 — CERBERUS/GDX) (1) | 7 |
| 2004/C 224/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/3501 — SEB TRYGG LIV/CODAN PENSION) (1) | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 224/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 224/2

Binding tariff information

2

2004/C 224/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3540 — CERBERUS/GDX) (1)

7

2004/C 224/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/3501 — SEB TRYGG LIV/CODAN PENSION) (1)

7

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 224/5 | Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ — Thematic priority area: ‘Sustainable energy systems’ — Call identifier: FP6-2004-Energy-3 | 8 |

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 224/5

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ — Thematic priority area: ‘Sustainable energy systems’ — Call identifier: FP6-2004-Energy-3

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 95-4244

___________ Billy Orr, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Kirkwood School District, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 23, 1997 Filed: February 18, 1997

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Billy Orr, an Afri can American, appeals the district court's 1 grant of summary judgment to Kirkwood School District in hi s emp loyment discrimination suit. After de novo review, we affir m the district court's decision with regard to Orr's federal claims. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. As to Orr's state-law claims, we modify the district court's order to reflect that they are dismissed withoutprejudice. See Labickas v. Arkansas State Univ. , 78 F.3d 33 3, 334-

35 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 395 (1996).
A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.