alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21**

**Subsidiariesof Cardinal Financial Corporation**

| Name of Subsidiary                           | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | State of Incorporation | ** ** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------|------------------------|------------|------------|
| Cardinal Bank                                |       | Virginia   |
| George Mason Mortgage, LLC                   |       | Virginia   |
| Cardinal Wealth  Services, Inc.         |       | Virginia   |
| Cardinal Statutory Trust  I                  |       | Delaware   |
| Wilson/Bennett Capital Management, Inc. |       | Virginia   |

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the annual report of GeneMax Corp.  (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB  for fiscal  year ended  December  31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Grant R.
Atkins,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  and Vaughn  Barbon,  Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  each  certifies for the purpose of complying
with Rule  13a-14(b) or Rule  15d-14(b) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
(the  "Exchange  Act") and Section  1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code, that:

         1.    the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
         2.    the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.




Dated: April 5, 2004                      By:  /s/ Grant R. Atkins
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Grant R. Atkins, Chief Executive
                                          Officer


Dated: April 5, 2004                      By:  /s/ Vaughn Barbon
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Vaughn Barbon, Chief Financial
                                          Officer
§ 152.605 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Building construction* means construction of any building which receives Federal assistance under the program, which will exceed $200,000 in construction cost.
*Energy assessment* means an analysis of total energy requirements of a building, which, within the scope of the proposed construction activity, and at a level of detail appropriate to that scope, considers the following: ( a ) Overall design of the facility or modification, and alternative designs;
( b ) Materials and techniques used in construction or rehabilitation;
( c ) Special or innovative conservation features that may be used;
( d ) Fuel requirements for heating, cooling, and operations essential to the function of the structure, projected over the life of the facility and including projected costs of this fuel; and
( e ) Kind of energy to be used, including— ( 1 ) Consideration of opportunities for using fuels other than petroleum and natural gas, and
( 2 ) Consideration of using alternative, renewable energy sources.
*Major building modification* means modification of any building which receives Federal assistance under the program, which will exceed $200,000 in construction cost.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.225 Provisional airworthiness certificates corresponding with provisional amendments to type certificates. ( a ) An applicant is entitled to a Class I or a Class II provisional airworthiness certificate, for an aircraft, for which a provisional amendment to the type certificate has been issued, if— ( 1 ) He meets the eligibility requirements of § 21.213 and he complies with this section; and
( 2 ) The FAA finds that there is no feature, characteristic, or condition of the aircraft, as modified in accordance with the provisionally amended type certificate, that would make the aircraft unsafe when operated in accordance with the applicable limitations established in §§ 21.85(g), 91.317, and 121.207 of this chapter.
( b ) The applicant must show that the modification was made under a quality system adequate to ensure that the modification conforms to the provisionally amended type certificate.
( c ) The applicant must submit a statement that the aircraft has been found by him to be in a safe operating condition under the applicable limitations.
( d ) The aircraft must be flown at least five hours by the manufacturer.
( e ) The aircraft must be supplied with a provisional aircraft flight manual or other document and appropriate placards containing the limitations required by §§ 21.85(g), 91.317, and 121.207 of this chapter.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14571, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-12, 31 FR 13389, Oct. 15, 1966; Amdt. 21-66, 54 FR 34329, Aug. 18, 1989; Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53390, Oct. 16, 2009]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1759/2004

of 11 October 2004         

fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 of 21 December 1987 fixing conditions for the application of preferential customs duties on imports of certain flowers originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (1), and in particular Article 5(2)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Community producer and import prices for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses as referred to in Article 1b of Regulation (EEC) No 700/88 for a fortnightly period shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 October 2004.

It shall apply from 13 to 26 October 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 October 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 382, 31.12.1987, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/97 (OJ L 177, 5.7.1997, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 72, 18.3.1988, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2062/97 (OJ L 289, 22.10.1997, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 11 October 2004 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip

----
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799-6 Filed:08/08/22 Entere

Envelope Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 12.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of ICON plc (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for
the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Gray, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:           
      February 23, 2010/s/
      Peter GrayPeter
      GrayChief
      Executive Officer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the report or
as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this written
statement required by section 906 has been provided to ICON plc and will be
retained by ICON plc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of ICON plc (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for
the year ending December  31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ciaran Murray, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:           
      February 23, 2010/s/Ciaran
      MurrayCiaran
      MurrayChief
      Financial Officer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the report or
as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this written
statement required by section 906 has been provided to ICON plc and will be
retained by ICON plc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
§ 16.215 Depositions. ( a ) *General.* For good cause shown, the hearing officer may order that the testimony of a witness may be taken by deposition and that the witness produce documentary evidence in connection with such testimony. Generally, an order to take the deposition of a witness is entered only if: ( 1 ) The person whose deposition is to be taken would be unavailable at the hearing;
( 2 ) The deposition is deemed necessary to perpetuate the testimony of the witness; or
( 3 ) The taking of the deposition is necessary to prevent undue and excessive expense to a party and will not result in undue burden to other parties or in undue delay.
( b ) *Application for deposition.* Any party desiring to take the deposition of a witness shall make application therefor to the hearing officer in writing, with a copy of the application served on each party. The application shall include: ( 1 ) The name and residence of the witness;
( 2 ) The time and place for the taking of the proposed deposition;
( 3 ) The reasons why such deposition should be taken; and
( 4 ) A general description of the matters concerning which the witness will be asked to testify.
( c ) *Order authorizing deposition.* If good cause is shown, the hearing officer, in his or her discretion, issues an order authorizing the deposition and specifying the name of the witness to be deposed, the location and time of the deposition and the general scope and subject matter of the testimony to be taken.
( d ) *Procedures for deposition.* ( 1 ) Witnesses whose testimony is taken by deposition shall be sworn or shall affirm before any questions are put to them. Each question propounded shall be recorded and the answers of the witness transcribed verbatim.
( 2 ) Objections to questions or evidence shall be recorded in the transcript of the deposition. The interposing of an objection shall not relieve the witness of the obligation to answer questions, except where the answer would violate a privilege.
( 3 ) The written transcript shall be subscribed by the witness, unless the parties by stipulation waive the signing, or the witness is ill, cannot be found, or refuses to sign. The reporter shall note the reason for failure to sign.
( e ) *Depositions of agency employees.* ( 1 ) Depositions of Agency Employees will not be allowed except under the provisions of 49 CFR part 9.
( 2 ) Such depositions will be allowed only with the specific written permission of the Chief Counsel or his or her designee.
[Doc. No. 27783, 61 FR 54004, Oct. 16, 1996, as amended at Amdt. 16-1, 78 FR 56147, Sept. 12, 2013]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 1 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 2 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 3 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 4 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 5 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 6 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 7 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 8 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 9 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 10 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 11 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 12 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 13 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 14 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 15 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 16 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 17 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 18 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 19 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2762-1 Filed:03/20/18 Entered:03/20/18 09:40:48 Desc:

Supplement Page 20 of 20
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3830 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3830

  To amend title 31, United States Code, to authorize the issuance of 
 United States Pandemic Bonds to aid in the funding of relief efforts 
            related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2020

 Mr. Sullivan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 31, United States Code, to authorize the issuance of 
 United States Pandemic Bonds to aid in the funding of relief efforts 
            related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Pandemic Relief Bonds 
Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

    The purpose of this Act is to authorize the issuance of United 
States Pandemic Bonds to aid in the funding of relief efforts related 
to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that the Department of the Treasury 
should--
            (1) consider offering Treasury bonds with maturity dates 
        longer than 30 years; and
            (2) significantly increase utilization of long-term debt 
        when interest rates on 30-year Treasury bonds are below 2 
        percent.

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF UNITED STATES PANDEMIC BONDS.

    Section 3102 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f) Issuance of United States Pandemic Bonds.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to issue 
        bonds under this section, to be known as `United States 
        Pandemic Relief Bonds', to aid in the funding of relief efforts 
        related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
            ``(2) Form.--The bonds authorized by paragraph (1) shall be 
        in such form and denominations, and shall be subject to such 
        terms and conditions of issue, conversion, redemption, 
        maturation, including for terms longer than 30 years, payment, 
        and rate of interest as the Secretary may prescribe.
            ``(3) Marketing.--The Secretary shall carry out a program 
        to encourage sales of United States Pandemic Relief Bonds, 
        including activities to facilitate the purchase of such bonds.
            ``(4) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated $5,000,000 for carrying out the marketing 
        program described in paragraph (3).''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Larry Wayne Richard v. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-14-00072-CR, 01-14-00073-CR

Trial court case numbers: 1233998, 1401120

Trial court: 185th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Larry Wayne Richard, has filed a pro se “Request to Withdraw Appeals” in 

his appeals. In his request, appellant states that he does not wish to further prosecute his appeal 

and asks that his notice of appeal be withdrawn.

By filing his request to withdraw his appeals, appellant effectively seeks to waive his 

right to appeal. Appellant has the right to waive his right to appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. 

art. 1.14 (West 2005); Ex parte Broadway, 301 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). Any 

such waiver, however, must be made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently. See id.; Ex parte 

Tabor, 565 S.W.2d 945, 946 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Appellant’s requests, however, do not 

provide any reason why he no longer wishes to prosecute the appeals or any other basis to show 

that he is voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently seeking to waive his right to appeal. 

Further, appellant is represented by counsel in these appeals, and appellant’s counsel has

not signed the request to withdraw the appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Counsel should 

confer with appellant. If appellant no longer wishes to prosecute his appeals, appellant’s counsel 

should file a motion that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) in each 

appeal.

Accordingly, we deny appellant’s pro se request to withdraw his appeals.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 1, 2014
**Exhibit 10.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

               In  connection with the Annual Report of RTICA Corporation (the "Company") on Form  20-F for the period ended May 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Warren Arseneau, Chief Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '   1350, as adopted pursuant to '   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  

               1.               The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and 

               2.               The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

  

BY:/s/ Warren Arseneau                                                                                          Warren Arseneau 

Chief Executive Officer  November 29, 2002 

  

----
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of
the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial Officer May 9, 2003
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCTOBER 3, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-14324

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00058-CR-SPM-WCS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

MICHEL GONZALO, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(October 3, 2006)

Before HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM: 

Michael Ufferman, court-appointed counsel for Michel Gonzalo in this
2

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Gonzalo’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal C 76/4 Ma

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 76 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 584 March 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 76

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 584 March 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 076/01 | Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 076/01

Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN