alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1203b.104 Exercise of arrest authority—general guidelines. ( a ) In making an arrest, the security force personnel should announce their authority and that the person is under arrest prior to taking the person into custody. If the circumstances are such that making such an announcement would be useless or dangerous to the security force personnel or others, the security force personnel may dispense with these announcements, but must subsequently identify themselves and their arrest authority to the arrested person(s) as soon as reasonably possible.
( b ) The security force personnel at the time and place of arrest may search the arrested person and the area immediately surrounding the arrested person for weapons and criminal evidence. This is to protect the arresting officer and to prevent the destruction of evidence.
( c ) Custody of the person arrested should be transferred to other Federal law enforcement personnel (e.g., United States Marshals or FBI agents) or to local law enforcement agency personnel, as appropriate, as soon as possible, in order to ensure the person is brought before a magistrate without unnecessary delay.
[57 FR 4926, Feb. 11, 1992, as amended at 78 FR 5125, Jan. 24, 2013]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AARON ERNEST JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 168 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AARON ERNEST JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 169 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of December, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 10.1.8

AMENDMENT ONE        TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT        Dated November 1, 2002

The Doe Run Resources Corporation (the "Company") and Marvin Kaiser (the "Employee" or "you") agree, effective November 1, 2002, to amend the Amended and
Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated October 2002, between the Company and Employee, by:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first written above.

| | THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION
d/b/a The Doe Run Company
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/IRA LEON RENNERTIra Leon Rennert
Chairman of the Board  
| | /s/MARVIN KAISERMarvin Kaiser
Employee                     



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,525,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  743,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    153,093
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,322,844
<PP&E>                                         122,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,542,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,123,328
<BONDS>                                      9,395,865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,723
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,978,178)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (5,976,455)
<SALES>                                        733,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               733,212
<CGS>                                          145,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,943,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             593,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,180,702)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,180,702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,180,702)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41384 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

− Appellee ,

v ersus
JAMES BRANDON STROUSE , Defendant

− Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09

- CR

- 46

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
James Strouse filed a notice of appeal from an order denying his motion

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 14, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41384 Document: 00514156161 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/14/2017No. 16

- 41384

2 under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 to correct the presentence report ( “ PSR ” ) after his conviction of possession of child pornography

. He does not address that motion in his a ppellate brief , however, and thereby has effectively not appealed that issue. See Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty

. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); see also Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222,
224

− 25 (5th Cir. 1993)

. Instead, Strouse ’s brief challenges an order by the district court , in a

sep a rate case , that denied a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion

. He also moves to vacate the Rule 60(b) order and to remand that case to the district
court. The Rule 60(b) motion is pending be fore this court in another appeal. Thus, with respect to Strouse’s Rule 36 and Rule 60(b) issues, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous

. See Howard v. King , 707 F.3d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).
To the extent that Strouse also seeks review of the order deny ing his recusal motion under 28 U.S.C. § 455, we lack jurisdiction because the notice of appeal designated the Rule 36 order and was filed before t he § 455 order was issued , so the appeal in that respect is DISMISSED for wa n t of jurisdiction

. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 3(c)(B ); W arfield v. Fid. & Deposit Co. , 904 F.2d 322, 325

− 26 (5th Cir. 1990). Strouse’s motions to disqualify the judge, vacate the judge’s orders, and remand are DENIED , as is Strouse’s motion to consolidate the two appeals. Case: 16-41384 Document: 00514156161 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/14/2017
§ 125.363 Flight release over water. ( a ) No person may release an airplane for a flight that involves extended overwater operation unless appropriate weather reports or forecasts, or any combination thereof, indicate that the weather conditions will be at or above the authorized minimums at the estimated time of arrival at any airport to which released or to any required alternate airport.
( b ) Each certificate holder shall conduct extended overwater operations under IFR unless it shows that operating under IFR is not necessary for safety.
( c ) Each certificate holder shall conduct other overwater operations under IFR if the Administrator determines that operation under IFR is necessary for safety.
( d ) Each authorization to conduct extended overwater operations under VFR and each requirement to conduct other overwater operations under IFR will be specified in the operations specifications.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Zaxis International Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ivo Heiden, President,CFO and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Ivo Heiden

Ivo Heiden President, CFO and ChairmanDated: November 8, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zaxis International Inc. and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3724 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3724

 To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from charging veterans 
        copayments for preventive services relating to COVID-19.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2020

Ms. Duckworth (for herself, Ms. Collins, and Mr. Tester) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from charging veterans 
        copayments for preventive services relating to COVID-19.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Coronavirus Copays for Veterans 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON COPAYMENTS AND COST SHARING FOR VETERANS 
              RECEIVING PREVENTIVE SERVICES RELATING TO COVID-19.

    (a) Prohibition.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not require 
any copayment or other cost sharing under chapter 17 of title 38, 
United States Code, for qualifying coronavirus preventive services. The 
requirement described in this subsection shall take effect with respect 
to a qualifying coronavirus preventive service on the specified date.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``qualifying 
coronavirus preventive service'' and ``specified date'' have the 
meaning given those terms in section 3203 of the CARES Act (Public Law 
116-136).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.31



                                    AMENDMENT

This Amendment is by and between CitiCapital Commercial Corporation ("Secured
Party") and RDO Material Handling Co. ("Debtor") and shall amend, be attached to
and specifically incorporated in that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated
October 23, 2002 between Secured Party and Debtor (referred to hereafter as the
"Security Agreement").

FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, Secured Party and Debtor agree to amend the Security
Agreement and the Supplemental as follows:

1.   The first paragraph of section 4.3(a) amended and restated, in its
     entirety, to read as follows:

     Guarantor must maintain Adjusted Net Worth greater than $50,000,000.

2.   This Amendment shall be effective as of   3/10/03  .
                                            ------------

3.   The Security Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and
     effect.


Dated:       March 3, 2003
      ---------------------------


RDO Material Handling Co.                     CitiCapital Commercial Corporation
(Debtor)                                      (Secured Party)

By:      /s/ Thomas K. Espel                  By:       /s/ James E. Chesser
      ---------------------------                   ----------------------------

Title:   Treasurer                            Title:    Vice President
      ---------------------------                   ----------------------------



AD023031
§ 1261.405 Subdivision of claims not authorized; other administrative proceedings. ( a ) *Subdivision of claims.* Claims may not be subdivided to avoid the $100,000 ceiling, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, for purposes of compromise (§ 1261.414) or suspension or termination of collection (§ 1261.416). The debtor's liability arising from a particular transaction or contract shall be considered a single claim (31 CFR 900.6).
( b ) Required administrative proceedings. Nothing contained in these regulations is intended to require NASA to omit, foreclose, or duplicate administrative proceedings required by contract or other applicable laws and implementing regulations (4 CFR 101.7).
[45 FR 48104, July 18, 1980, as amended at 82 FR 29384, June 29, 2017]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6965

DAVID EDWARD MOORE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL ROY COOPER, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-03-375) Submitted: November 30, 2005 Decided: December 15, 2005 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Edward Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: David Edward Moore, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

Hunt, Jeff

From: Melissa.Gibbs@deq.idaho.gov

Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:40 PM

To: Hunt, Jeff

Cc: Mike.Edwards@deq.idaho.gov; Sue.Richards@deq.idaho.gov; 

robert.wilkosz@deq.idaho.gov; Thomas.Edwards@deq.idaho.gov

Subject: Cache Valley Idaho PM2.5 Nonattainment Area SIP MVEB section language and Table 9

Attachments: May 14Cache Valley PM2_5 SIP page 47-48.pdf

Jeff per our phone conversation, DEQ has modified Table 9 in Section 5.5.2  Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget of the

Cache Valley  Idaho PM2.5 Nonattainment Area SIP.  As well as cleaned up the language in Section 5.5.2, which

corresponded to the date ranges in the Table.   

Specifically, the range of dates was changed to the specific year, in order for the tables to more closely match the text of

the section.  Per our discussion, the change is for clarification purposes, is minor, and does not require public comment.

The modified disk is being sent to you and should arrive shortly.  The SIP on the DEQ web has been modified and is still

at the same web address.  That web address is  

http://www.deq.idaho.gov/regional‐offices‐issues/pocatello/air‐quality‐plans‐reports.aspx

Additionally I have also included a pdf  of page 47 and 48 (since its double sided) for you to replace in the hard copy that

you have at EPA.   

Thanks for your attention to this project.    

Melissa Gibbs

Airshed Coordinator

Idaho Department of Environmental Quality

444 Hospital Way #300

Pocatello, Idaho 83204

Cell: 208-705-8367

Office: 208-236-6160

Email: melissa.gibbs@deq.idaho.gov
cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Christopher R. Oram Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Edrick Dillard Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 

### e 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24258 Filed:05/18/23 Entered:05/19/23 10:34:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24258 Filed:05/18/23 Entered:05/19/23 10:34:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 712.9 [Reserved]
#### § 404.38 No private right of action.

Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as creating any right, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or equity by a party against Ex-Im Bank or the United States.

[71 FR 14361, Mar. 22, 2006. Redesignated at 87 FR 41034, July 11, 2022]
**Exhibit 31.4** **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO****SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     I, Scott Poteracki, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of MTI    Technology Corporation (the “Company”), certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual    Report on    Form 10-K    for the fiscal year ended April 7, 2007, of the    Company; and     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.      By: /s/  SCOTT    POTERACKI    Scott Poteracki    Chief Financial Officer and Secretary     Date: September 11, 2007
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

US Airways, Inc. and Sedgwick :

Claims Management Services, Inc., :

Petitioners :

:

v. : No. 612 C.D. 2017

:

Workers' Compensation Appeal :

Board (Bockelman), :

Respondent :

O R D E R

NOW, March 28, 2018

, upon consideration of petitioner s ’

application for re argument , a nd respondent’s answer in response thereto

, t he

application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

President Judge
EXHIBIT

\ \ DdDESCRIPTION AND OPERATION MANUAL

Airplane Operating Procedures

Chapter 7

flight Op erc tion Dolo

Approach Speed Would be 9S

tJ3idS.clV li01V)10NI S.Nt v IdV) Knots x 1.3= 123.5 knots or

124 knots

FiQure 7-43. four-E''',;"e Characteristic Sneed Chorl
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3824 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3824

To require the Federal Trade Commission to submit a report to Congress 
          on scams targeting seniors, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2020

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Moran) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Trade Commission to submit a report to Congress 
          on scams targeting seniors, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Seniors from Emergency 
Scams Act''.

SEC. 2. FTC REPORT ON SCAMS TARGETING SENIORS DURING EMERGENCIES.

    Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Federal Trade Commission (referred to in this Act as the 
``Commission'') shall submit a report to Congress including--
            (1) a description of the number and types of scams 
        identified by the Commission as being targeted at senior 
        citizens; and
            (2) policy recommendations to prevent such scams, 
        especially as such scams relate to future national emergencies.

SEC. 3. INCREASING AWARENESS OF SCAMS TARGETING SENIORS.

    (a) In General.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Commission shall update its web portal to include the 
latest information, searchable by region and type of scam, on scams 
targeting seniors, including contacts for relevant law enforcement and 
adult protective service agencies.
    (b) Coordination With Media Outlets and Law Enforcement.--The 
Commission shall work with media outlets and law enforcement to 
distribute the information included in the web portal of the Commission 
pursuant to subsection (a) to senior citizens and their families and 
caregivers.
                                 <all>
```
#### §§ 13.21 -13.29 [Reserved]
#### § 7.5000 Scope.

This subpart applies to a national bank's use of technology to deliver services and products consistent with safety and soundness.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
I. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1).     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2).     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  October 14, 2003                             By:  /s/ Douglas I. Payne
                                                    -------------------------
                                                       Douglas I. Payne
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1207.101 Cross-references to ethical conduct, financial disclosure, and other applicable regulations.

Employees of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) should refer to the executive branch-wide Standards of Ethnical Conduct at 5 CFR part 2635, the NASA regulation at 5 CFR part 6901 which supplements the executive branch-wide standards with respect to prohibitions and prior approval requirements applicable to certain outside employment activities, the Office of Personnel Management provisions on employee responsibilities and conduct at 5 CFR part 735, and the executive branch-wide financial disclosure regulation at 5 CFR part 2634.

[59 FR 49338, Sept. 28, 1994]