alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15
                                                                                
                      Independent Auditors' Review Report
                      -----------------------------------

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The Centris Group, Inc.:

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of The Centris Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1998, and the related condensed
consolidated income statements for the quarters and six-month periods ended June
30, 1998 and 1997, and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the
six-month periods ended June 30, 1998 and 1997.  These condensed consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for
them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of The Centris Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated income
statement, statements of stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 3, 1998, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In
our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1997, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it
has been derived.

/s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Los Angeles, California
July 17, 1998
§ 137.40 Employment of former FAA employees. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, no certificate holder may knowingly employ or make a contractual arrangement which permits an individual to act as an agent or representative of the certificate holder in any matter before the Federal Aviation Administration if the individual, in the preceding 2 years— ( 1 ) Served as, or was directly responsible for the oversight of, a Flight Standards Service aviation safety inspector; and
( 2 ) Had direct responsibility to inspect, or oversee the inspection of, the operations of the certificate holder.
( b ) For the purpose of this section, an individual shall be considered to be acting as an agent or representative of a certificate holder in a matter before the agency if the individual makes any written or oral communication on behalf of the certificate holder to the agency (or any of its officers or employees) in connection with a particular matter, whether or not involving a specific party and without regard to whether the individual has participated in, or had responsibility for, the particular matter while serving as a Flight Standards Service aviation safety inspector.
( c ) The provisions of this section do not prohibit a certificate holder from knowingly employing or making a contractual arrangement which permits an individual to act as an agent or representative of the certificate holder in any matter before the Federal Aviation Administration if the individual was employed by the certificate holder before October 21, 2011.
[Doc. No. FAA-2008-1154, 76 FR 52236, Aug. 22, 2011]
#### § 1261.505 Multiple debts.

When collecting multiple debts by administrative offset, NASA will apply the recovered amounts to those debts in accordance with the best interests of the United States, as determined by the facts and circumstances of the particular case, paying special attention to applicable statutes of limitations.
# Official Journal C 326/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.326.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 326 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5410 November 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.326.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 326

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5410 November 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2011/C 326/01 | Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2010, together with the institutions’ replies | 1 |
| 2011/C 326/02 | Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2010, together with the Commission's replies | 251 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Auditors

2011/C 326/01

Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2010, together with the institutions’ replies

1

2011/C 326/02

Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2010, together with the Commission's replies

251

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Thomas G. Mair, President and Chief Executive Officer of Golden Star Resources Ltd., certify, to the
best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 of Golden Star Resources Ltd. that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Golden Star Resources Ltd.



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas G. Mair                                                    
|Thomas G. Mair President and
Chief Executive Officer February 23, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS TRUSTEE OF STANWICH

MORTAGE LOAN TRUST A

v.

PAMELA A. VUKMAN (A/K/A PAMELA MCDEAVITT), LEO MCDEAVITT, AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF 104 DORF DRIVE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15209

PETITION OF: PAMELA MCDEAVITT :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 218 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of November, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
§ 151.27 Procedures: Application, plans, specifications, and appraisals. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each sponsor shall incorporate by reference in its project application the final plans and specifications, describing the items of airport development for which it requests United States aid. It must submit the plans and specifications with the application unless they were previously submitted or are submitted with that of another sponsor of the project.
( b ) In special cases, the Administrator authorizes the postponement of the submission of final plans and specifications until a later date to be specified in the grant agreement, if the sponsor has submitted— ( 1 ) An airport layout plan approved by the Administrator; and
( 2 ) Preliminary plans and specifications in enough detail to identify all items of development included in the project, and prepared so as to provide for accomplishing the project in accordance with the master plan layout, the rules in subparts B and C and applicable local laws and regulations.
( c ) If the project involves acquiring a property interest in land by donation, or at a cost that (as represented by the sponsor) is not the actual cost or the amount of an award in eminent domain proceedings, the Administrator, before passing on the eligibility of the project makes or obtains an appraisal of the interest. If the appraised value is less than the value placed on the interest by the sponsor (§ 151.23), the Administrator notifies the sponsor that he may within a stated time, ask in writing for reconsideration of the appraisal and submit statements of pertinent facts and opinion.
[Doc. No. 1329, 27 FR 12351, Dec. 13, 1962, as amended by Amdt. 151-8, 30 FR 8039, June 23, 1965; Amdt. 151-17, 31 FR 16524, Dec. 28, 1966]
[Cite as Mention v. Car-X , 2011-Ohio-6383.] 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

CHARLES MENTION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. CAR-X, Defendant-Appellee. 

### :

:

:

:

: APPEAL NO. C-110335 TRIAL NO. 09CV-22296

O P I N I O N.



### Civil Appeal From: Hamilton County Municipal Court Judgment Appealed From Is: Reversed and Cause Remanded Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal: December 14, 2011

Eric D. Bender, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Please note: This case has been removed from the accelerated calendar.OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS



### 2 S YLVIA S IEVE H ENDON , Judge. 

### {¶1} Plaintiff-appellant Charles Mention filed a complaint against defendantappellee Car-X, alleging negligence, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act, R.C. 1345.01 et seq. The municipal court referred the case to a magistrate who dismissed the complaint for failure to prosecute and entered judgment for Car-X. Mention objected to the magistrate’s decision, asserting that he had

not received notice of the trial date or of th e possibility of a dismissal. The trial court overruled his objections. Mention now appeals. 

### {¶2} In a single assignment of error, Mention argues that the trial court erred by dismissing his complaint for failure to prosecut e without giving him notice as required by Civ.R. 41. We agree. 

### {¶3} Under Civ.R. 41(B)(1), where a plaintiff fails to prosecute an action, the court may, after notice to plaintiff’s counsel, dis miss the action. Under the rule, notice is a prerequisite to dismissal for failure to prosecute. Logsdon v. Nichols (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 124, 128, 647 N.E.2d 1361. The notice requirement allows a party in default the opportunity to explain or correct a default before a dismissal. Id.; Penaranda v. DNJ Holdings, LLC , 1st Dist. No. C-090739, 2010-Ohio-5848. Thus, before a trial court may dismiss a case for failure to prosecute, the court must provide noti ce of its intent to do so to the plaintiff’s

counsel. Perotti v. Ferguson (1983), 7 Ohio St.3d 1, 454 N.E.2d 951, syllabus; Logsdon

, supra, at 128; Penaranda , supra. 

### {¶4} The record discloses no notice to plaintiff’s counsel or to the plaintiff that the action was subject to dismissal. Therefore, th e trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s

action. 

### {¶5} Because the dismissal entered in this case did not comply with the notice provisions of Civ.R. 41(B)(1), we sustain the assignment of error, reverse the judgment ofOHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS



### 3 the trial court, and remand the cause to the tr ial court for further proceedings in accordance

with law. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

D INKELACKER , P.J., and C UNNINGHAM , J. , concur.

Please Note: The court has recorded its own entry on the date of the release of this opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive
Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|August 11, 2004           
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|August 11, 2004
()RONAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

OP 20-0417

WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY

OF NEW YORK, INC., CHRISTIAN

CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES,

and THOMPSON FALLS CONGREGATION OF

JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES,

Petitioners,

v.

MONTANA TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT, SANDERS COUNTY, and THE

HONORABLE ELIZABETH A. BEST,

PRESIDING JUDGE,

Respondents.

OCT 2 1 2020

Bovven Greenwood

Clerk of Suprema Court

State of Montana

ORDER

This case is up before the Court on a petition for writ of supervisory control.

IT IS ORDERED that the Honorable Shane A Vannatta, District Judge, will sit on

the case in place ofJustice Laurie McKinnon, who has recused herself.

The Clerk of this Court shall give notice of this Order to all counsel of record and

to the Honorable Shane A. Vannatta.

.44

DATED this Z14—day of October, 2020.

For the Court,

B/Zt';'

Justice

d 4

10/22/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0417
§ 7.2025 Capital stock-related activities of a national bank. ( a ) *In general.* A national bank must obtain the necessary shareholder approval required by 12 U.S.C. 51a, 57, or 59 for any change in its permanent capital. An increase or decrease in the amount of a national bank's common or preferred stock is a change in permanent capital subject to the notice and approval requirements of 12 CFR 5.46 and applicable law. A national bank may obtain the required shareholder approval of changes in permanent capital, as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section.
( b ) *Issuance of previously approved and authorized common stock.* In compliance with 12 U.S.C. 57, a national bank may issue common stock up to an amount previously approved and authorized in the national bank's articles of association by holders of two-thirds of the national bank's shares without obtaining additional shareholder approval for each subsequent issuance within the authorized amount.
( c ) *Issuance, repurchase, and redemption of preferred stock pursuant to certain procedures.* Subject to the requirements of 12 U.S.C. 51a and 59, a national bank may adopt procedures to authorize the board of directors to issue, determine the terms of, repurchase, and redeem one or more series of preferred stock, if permitted by the corporate governance provisions adopted by the bank under § 7.2000. To satisfy the shareholder approval requirements of 12 U.S.C. 51a and 59, the adoption of such procedures must be approved by shareholders in advance through an amendment to the national bank's articles of association. Any amendment to a national bank's articles of association that authorizes both the issuance and the repurchase and redemption of shares must be approved by holders of two-thirds of the national bank's shares.
( d ) *Share repurchase programs.* Subject to the requirements of 12 U.S.C. 59, a national bank may establish a program for the repurchase, from time to time, of the national bank's common or preferred stock, if permitted by the corporate governance provisions adopted by the bank under § 7.2000. To satisfy the shareholder approval requirement of 12 U.S.C. 59, the repurchase program must be approved in advance by the holders of two-thirds of the national bank's shares, including through an amendment to the national bank's articles of association that authorizes the board of directors to repurchase the national bank's common or preferred stock from time to time under board-determined parameters that can limit the frequency, type, aggregate limit, or purchase price of repurchases.
( e ) *Preferred Stock Features.* A national bank's preferred stock may be cumulative or non-cumulative and may or may not have voting rights on one or more series.
[85 FR 83736, Dec. 22, 2020]
# Official Journal L 164/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 164 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6410 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 164

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6410 May 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Decision No 1/2021 of the Eu-Jordan Association Council of 15 April 2021 amending the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part, by replacing Protocol 3 thereto concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation [2021/742] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Decision No 1/2021 of the Eu-Jordan Association Council of 15 April 2021 amending the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part, by replacing Protocol 3 thereto concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation [2021/742]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 1212.301 Processing the request to amend. ( a ) Within 10 work days of receipt by NASA of a request to amend a record, the system manager shall provide the requester with a written determination or acknowledgement advising when action may be taken.
( b ) When necessary, NASA may utilize up to 30 work days after receipt to provide the determination on a request to amend a record.
( c ) If the request for amendment is denied, the determination shall explain the reasons for the denial and inform the requester of the procedures to follow for appeal (See § 1212.4)).
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.77

                                                                       Exhibit A

                             NINTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                                 MIRANT SERVICES
                              EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN

         WHEREAS, Mirant Services, LLC (the "Company") heretofore adopted the
Mirant Services Employee Savings Plan (the "Plan"), effective December 19, 2000,
and subsequently amended and restated effective as of April 2, 2001;

         WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to provide that,
effective April 1, 2003, no new investments may be made in the Company Stock
Fund (as that term is defined in the Plan) under the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Americas Benefits Committee (the "Committee") is
authorized pursuant to Section 15.1 of the Plan to amend the Plan at any time,
provided such amendment does not involve a substantial increase in cost to the
Company.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows, to be
effective as of April 1, 2003:

                                        I

         EFFECTIVE AS OF APRIL 1, 2003, SECTION 8.1 OF THE PLAN SHALL BE DELETED
IN ITS ENTIRETY AND REPLACED WITH THE FOLLOWING NEW SECTION 8.1:

8.1      Investment Funds. The Investment Funds shall be selected from time to
time by the Qualified Plans Investment Review Committee (the "Investment Review
Committee"). In addition to such other Investment Funds selected by the
Investment Review Committee, the Investment Funds shall include the "Company
Stock Fund." The Company Stock Fund shall be invested and reinvested in Common
Stock, provided that funds applicable to the purchase of Common Stock pending
investment of such funds may be temporarily invested in short-term United States
Government obligations, other obligations guaranteed by the United States
Government, commercial paper, or certificates of deposit, and, if the Trustee so
determines, may be transferred to money market funds utilized by the Trustee for
qualified employee benefit trusts. Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective
April 1, 2003, no new investments may be made in the Company Stock Fund and,
should a Participant elect to reduce the portion of his Account that is invested
in the Company Stock Fund, he may not again reinvest any additional assets in
the Company Stock Fund.

                                       II.

         EXCEPT AS AMENDED HEREIN BY THIS NINTH AMENDMENT, THE PLAN SHALL REMAIN
IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AS AMENDED AND RESTATED BY THE COMPANY PRIOR TO THE
ADOPTION OF THIS NINTH AMENDMENT.


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee, through a duly authorized officer of
the Company, has adopted this Ninth Amendment to the Plan this 25th day of
March, 2003 to be effective as of April 1, 2003.

                                               MIRANT SERVICES, LLC



                                               By: /s/ Dianne Davenport

                                               Title:  VP, Human Resources


                                       2