alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ending July 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I Christopher J. Ryan, Chief
Executive Officer, President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christopher J. Ryan
-----------------------------
Christopher J. Ryan
Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary
and General Counsel

September 13, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, James A. Clark, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Critical Path, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: April 13, 2007By:

/s/    JAMES A.
CLARKJames A. Clark Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                                      5
<LEGEND>
                            THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                       EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND
                              THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                    MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                                                   TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                                 0000797977
<NAME>                                PARTICIPATING INCOME PROPERTIES 1986, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                                          U.S. DOLLARS
                                               
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           2,356,736
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      268,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                          37,069,375
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,266,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,427,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,949,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,427,734
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,511,640
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      509,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,001,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,001,038
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,001,038
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        19.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                                               

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3785

To authorize the exchange of certain land in Everglades National Park. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2004

Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the exchange of certain land in Everglades 

National Park.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK LAND EX4 CHANGE. 

5 Section 102 of the Everglades National Park Protec6 tion and Expansion Act of 1989 (16 U.S.C. 410r–6) is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(h) LAND EXCHANGE.—

9 ‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 
2

•HR 3785 IH 

1 ‘‘(A) DISTRICT.—The term ‘District’ 

2 means the South Florida Water Management 

3 District. 

4 ‘‘(B) FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘Federal 

5 land’ means the approximately 1,054 acres of 

6 land located in the Rocky Glades area of the 

7 park and identified on the map as ‘NPS Ex8 change Lands’. 

9 ‘‘(C) MAP.—The term ‘map’ means the 

10 map entitled ‘Boundary Modification for C–111 

11 Project, Everglades National Park’, numbered 

12 160/80,007, and dated April 30, 2002. 

13 ‘‘(D) NON-FEDERAL LAND.—The term 

14 ‘non-Federal land’ means the approximately 

15 1,054 acres of District land located in the 

16 Southern Glades Wildlife and Environmental 

17 Area and identified on the map as ‘South Flor18 ida Water Management District Exchange 

19 Lands’. 

20 ‘‘(2) EXCHANGE.—The Secretary shall convey 

21 to the District the fee title to the Federal land in 

22 exchange for the fee title to the non-Federal land. 

23 ‘‘(3) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map shall be 

24 on file and available for public inspection in the ap25 propriate offices of the National Park Service. 
3

•HR 3785 IH 

1 ‘‘(4) USE OF FEDERAL LAND.—The Federal 

2 land conveyed to the District shall be used by the 

3 District compatible with the purposes of the C–111 

4 project, including restoration of the Everglades nat5 ural system. 

6 ‘‘(5) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—On completion 

7 of the land exchange under paragraph (2), the Sec8 retary shall modify the boundary of the park to re9 flect the exchange of the Federal land and non-Fed10 eral land.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          54,599
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,717
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    301,366
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             677
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               699
<LOANS>                                      1,229,939
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,637,106
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,276,280
<SHORT-TERM>                                    94,635
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             23,031
<LONG-TERM>                                    111,482
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,487
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,637,106
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 99,924
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               21,025
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,544
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               123,493
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              48,858
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,720
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           59,773
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,963
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,152
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 53,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,432
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,432
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,432
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.18
<LOANS-NON>                                     12,369
<LOANS-PAST>                                     7,107
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,136
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    8,838
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,146
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,407
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            12,407
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
#### § 235.10 Effective and compliance dates.

Except as provided in § 235.7, this part becomes effective and compliance is mandatory on October 1, 2011.
# Official Journal C 437/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 437 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6230 December 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 437

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6230 December 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2019/C 437/01 | Twenty-First Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2019/C 437/01

Twenty-First Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment

1

---

| EN | This issue closes the C series for 2019. |
| --- | --- |

EN

This issue closes the C series for 2019.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24528 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 17:23:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24528 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 17:23:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24528 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 17:23:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24528 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 17:23:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24528 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 17:23:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 5
§ 161.205 Required analysis of proposed restriction and alternatives. ( a ) Each airport operator proposing a noise or access restriction on Stage 2 aircraft operations shall prepare the following and make it available for public comment: ( 1 ) An analysis of the anticipated or actual costs and benefits of the proposed noise or access restriction;
( 2 ) A description of alternative restrictions; and
( 3 ) A description of the alternative measures considered that do not involve aircraft restrictions, and a comparison of the costs and benefits of such alternative measures to costs and benefits of the proposed noise or access restriction.
( b ) In preparing the analyses required by this section, the airport operator shall use the noise measurement systems and identify the airport noise study area as specified in §§ 161.9 and 161.11, respectively; shall use currently accepted economic methodology; and shall provide separate detail on the costs and benefits of the proposed restriction with respect to the operations of Stage 2 aircraft weighing less than 75,000 pounds if the restriction applies to this class. The airport operator shall specify the methods used to analyze the costs and benefits of the proposed restriction and the alternatives.
( c ) The kinds of information set forth in § 161.305 are useful elements of an adequate analysis of a noise or access restriction on Stage 2 aircraft operations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                    $ 1,228,022
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               5,979,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            7,553,269
<PP&E>                                     20,557,571
<DEPRECIATION>                             15,960,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             12,456,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       4,102,233
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                   13,883,965
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,669,155)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               12,456,375
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           12,574,316
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              11,478,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               63,327
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             89,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               943,007
<INCOME-TAX>                                  102,556
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           840,451
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  840,451
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .18


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7026

RODNEY A. KOON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; BRIAN K. WELLS , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:16

- ct

- 03301

- FL )

Submitted : December 18, 2018 Decided: December 21, 2018

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Rodney A. Koon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rodney A. Koon seeks to appeal the district court’s or der dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint in part as moot and in part for failure to state a claim, and a subsequent order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral order s , 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 47 (1949). Because Koon may remedy the identified deficiencies in h is initial complaint through the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the dismissal of his complaint without prejudice
is neither a final nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc. , 807 F.3d 6 19, 623 (4th Cir. 2015) ; Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar
Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to
the district court with instructions to allow Koon to file an amended complaint

. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED

* Although the district court denied Koon’s motion to amend on the ground that his proposed amendment would be futile, the court left open the possibility that Koon could allege sufficient facts in support o f his request for compensatory damages.
§ 171.209 Installation requirements. ( a ) The facility must be installed according to accepted good engineering practices, applicable electric and safety codes, and Federal Communications Commission requirements.
( b ) The facility must have a reliable source of suitable primary power.
( c ) Dual transmitting equipment may be required, if applicable, to support certain IFR procedures.
( d ) At facilities within or immediately adjacent to controlled airspace and that are intended for use as instrument approach aids for an airport, there must be ground-air communications or reliable communications (at least a landline telephone) from the airport to the nearest Federal Aviation Administration air traffic control or communication facility. Compliance with this paragraph need not be shown at airports where an adjacent Federal Aviation Administration facility can communicate with aircraft on the ground at the airport and during the entire proposed instrument approach procedure. In addition, at low traffic density airports within or immediately adjacent to controlled airspace, and where extensive delays are not a factor, the requirements of this paragraph may be reduced to reliable communications (at least a landline telephone) from the airport to the nearest Federal Aviation Administration air traffic control or communications facility, if an adjacent Federal Aviation Administration facility can communicate with aircraft during the proposed instrument approach procedure, at least down to the minimum en route altitude for the controlled airspace area.
[Doc. No. 10116, 35 FR 12716, Aug. 11, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 171-16, 56 FR 65665, Dec. 17, 1991]
#### STEWART VENEER CO. v. RAMEY.

(Decided February 11th, 1915.)

Appeal from Hale Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. Charles E. Waller.

*675Josepi-i H. James, for appellant. Thomas E. Knight, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### BRACKENRIDGE *v.*HUSTED.

Substance — justice’s transcript — error—appeal from a non suit.

Where a justice upon an appeal certified his transcript as containing the *substance oí*his proceedings, it is sufficient on a writ of error.

An appeal lies from a judgment of non suit rendered by a justice.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas.

By the Court.

The case below was an appeal taken from a non suit entered before a justice of the peace. The transcript filed was of the *substance*of the proceedings before the justice, and the Court of Common Pleas sustained the appeal. An appeal, by the law in force when this appeal was taken, lay from *any*judgment of a justice, and embraced a judgment of non suit. The substance is all that is looked to on error.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
§ 1212.700 NASA employees. ( a ) Each NASA employee is responsible for adhering to the requirements of the Privacy Act and this regulation.
( b ) An employee shall not seek or obtain access to a record in a NASA system of records or to copies of any portion of such records under false pretenses. Only those employees with an official “need to know” may seek and obtain access to records pertaining to others.
( c ) Employees shall refrain from discussing or disclosing personal information about others which they have obtained because of their official need to know such information in the performance of official duties.
( d ) To the extent included in a contract which provides for the maintenance by or on behalf of NASA of a system of records to accomplish a function of NASA, the requirements of this section shall apply to contractor employees who work under the contract.
Docket No. FAA-2013-0671