alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*

 Circuit Judge of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

m 00-60812

CLAUDE RUFUS HUTCHINS,

Petitioner,

VERSUS

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,

Respondent.

Appeal from the Determination of the 

United States Parole Commission

m 02512-180

November 19, 2001

Before BALDOCK,* SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:**

In this prisoner transfer treaty case, Hutchins appeals his release date

determination made by the United States Parole Commission pursuant to 18
2

U.S.C. § 4106A(b)(1)(A). Hutchins claims that the Parole Commission

improperly considered Hutchins’ need for rehabilitation in setting his release date

in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 994(k) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(a). We have reviewed

the briefs and applicable portions of the record and have heard the arguments of

counsel. We conclude that the United States Parole Commission committed no

reversible error.

The judgment, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0527 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MARCIAL MEJIA JR
. ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 22 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 16 2020

03/16/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0527
§ 125.29 Duration of certificate. ( a ) A certificate issued under this part is effective until surrendered, suspended, or revoked.
( b ) The Administrator may suspend or revoke a certificate under section 609 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 and the applicable procedures of part 13 of this chapter for any cause that, at the time of suspension or revocation, would have been grounds for denying an application for a certificate.
( c ) If the Administrator suspends or revokes a certificate or it is otherwise terminated, the holder of that certificate shall return it to the Administrator.
Exhibit C

RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, DATED AS OF FEBRUARY 11, 2022, BY 

AND AMONG (I) WHITEFISH ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC, (II) PREPA, AND (II) THE 

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS TITLE

III REPRESENTATIVE OF PREPA

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23584-3 Filed:02/21/23 Entered:02/21/23 14:57:21 Desc:

Exhibit C Page 1 of 18
















Execution Copy

16 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement, effective as of 

the latest date set forth below.

FOR WHITEFISH ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC:

_______ _________________ 

Name: 

Title: Chief Executive Officer

DATED: ________________ ___

FOR PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY:

_______________________________________ 

Name: 

Title: 

DATED: _______________________________

FOR FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO: 

_______________________________________ 

Name: Natalie A. Jaresko 

Title: Executive Director

DATED: __2/11/22_______________________

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23584-3 Filed:02/21/23 Entered:02/21/23 14:57:21 Desc:

Exhibit C Page 18 of 18
#### § 152.101 Applicability.

This subpart contains requirements and application procedures applicable to airport development and planning projects.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.197 Special flight permits. ( a ) A special flight permit may be issued for an aircraft that may not currently meet applicable airworthiness requirements but is capable of safe flight, for the following purposes: ( 1 ) Flying the aircraft to a base where repairs, alterations, or maintenance are to be performed, or to a point of storage.
( 2 ) Delivering or exporting the aircraft.
( 3 ) Production flight testing new production aircraft.
( 4 ) Evacuating aircraft from areas of impending danger.
( 5 ) Conducting customer demonstration flights in new production aircraft that have satisfactorily completed production flight tests.
( b ) A special flight permit may also be issued to authorize the operation of an aircraft at a weight in excess of its maximum certificated takeoff weight for flight beyond the normal range over water, or over land areas where adequate landing facilities or appropriate fuel is not available. The excess weight that may be authorized under this paragraph is limited to the additional fuel, fuel-carrying facilities, and navigation equipment necessary for the flight.
( c ) Upon application, as prescribed in §§ 91.1017 or 119.51 of this chapter, a special flight permit with a continuing authorization may be issued for aircraft that may not meet applicable airworthiness requirements, but are capable of safe flight for the purpose of flying aircraft to a base where maintenance or alterations are to be performed. The permit issued under this paragraph is an authorization, including conditions and limitations for flight, which is set forth in the certificate holder's operations specifications. The permit issued under this paragraph may be issued to— ( 1 ) Certificate holders authorized to conduct operations under part 119 of this chapter, that have an approved program for continuing flight authorization; or
( 2 ) Management specification holders authorized to conduct operations under part 91, subpart K of this chapter for those aircraft they operate and maintain under a continuous airworthiness maintenance program prescribed by § 91.1411 of this chapter.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14570, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-21, 33 FR 6859, May 7, 1968; Amdt. 21-51, 45 FR 60170, Sept. 11, 1980; Amdt. 21-54, 46 FR 37878, July 23, 1981; Amdt. 21-79, 66 FR 21066, Apr. 27, 2001; Amdt. 21-84, 68 FR 54559, Sept. 17, 2003; Amdt. 21-87, 71 FR 536, Jan. 4, 2006; Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53389, Oct. 16, 2009]
Exhibit 10(b)















	EXHIBIT 10(b)





	CONSENT OF SHEARMAN & STERLING




	     We hereby consent
to the reference to our firm included in the prospectus and statement of additional
information of Merrill  Lynch Strategy Series, Inc. filed as part of Post-Effective
Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement (File No. 333-88849) and to  the use of our
opinion of counsel, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 9 to Post-Effective Amendment
No. 3 to the Registration  Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 333-88849).






	 	/s/ Shearman & Sterling
      

    
	 	      Shearman
      & Sterling





	New York, New York 

      April 23, 2003
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cosine Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Terry Gibson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Terry Gibson
-----------------------------------------
Terry Gibson
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2004
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 392 

To clarify that funding for the standard setting body designated pursuant 

to section 19(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 is not subject to the sequester. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. ENZI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To clarify that funding for the standard setting body designated pursuant to section 19(b) of the Securities Act 

of 1933 is not subject to the sequester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION. 

4 Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emer5 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) does 

6 not apply with respect to the funding of the standard set7 ting body designated pursuant to section 19(b) of the Se8 curities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77s(b)). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.1.11

CERTIFIED TRANSLATION

FIRST ADDENDUM TO THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT  FOR FOREIGN PERSONNEL

Know all men by these men by these presents, which is being signed in three copies, the Addendum to the Employment Contract for Foreign Personnel of
March 31St 2003 (File No 38065-03, Registration No 777-03), entered into on the one hand by DOE RUN PERU
S.R.L. with R.U.C. No 20376303811 of Victor Andrés Belaúnde 147, 9th Floor, Camino Real Business CenterTorre Real 3, San Isidro, Lima,
the establishment thereof duly recorded on Card No 143658 of the Book of Business Partnerships of the Public Registry of Lima, engaged in activities related to the mining and
metallurgical industry, duly represented by its Financial Manager Mister Eric Peitz, according to the power of attorney duly registered under Entry No 11015369 of the Registry of
Body Corporates of Lima, hereinafter to be called "THE EMPLOYER"; and on the other hand Mister Albert Bruce Neíl, identified by Canadian
Passport No MJ524767 born in the city of Tofino, British Columbia, Canada, Canadian citizen, of masculine sex, 57 years old, married, of profession Engineer, domiciled at
Victor Andrés Belaúnde No 147 9th Floor, Camino Real Business CenterTorre Real 3, San Isidro, Lima, hereinafter to be called
"THE EMPLOYEE" under the following terms and conditions:

FIRST: BACKGROUND

On March 31St 2003, a working contract ("THE CONTRACT") was entered into by THE EMPLOYER and THE EMPLOYEE for a term of three
(3) years which as approved on April 11t" of the same year, under file No 36065-03, Registry
No 777-03

SECOND: THE REMUNERATION

Both parties agree to amend point 5.1 of the Fifth Clause of THE CONTRACT, as follows:

THE
EMPLOYER shall pay THE EMPLOYEE, as remuneration the following:

Monthly income

US$16,666.66 × 12 = US$200,000.00Sub-annual total

US$200,000.00


THIRD: THE OTHER CLAUSES

All other clauses of the CONTRACT shall continue without changes.

Made
and signed in the city of Lima, on the June 1St 2004, in three (3) copies with the same text, as evidence if the parties and of the Labor Authorities of
Peru, to those approval it shall be submitted.

|(one illegible signature)
THE EMPLOYEE |  | (one illegible signature)
THE EMPLOYER
|-------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------

(Translators
Note): All pages bear the following seal:

Labor
and Employment Promotion MinistryOffice for Documentary Procedures



As
regards Appeal No 9578-04; the applying company having complied with amending the observations made by Resolution dated June 4th
2004; therefore, according to the provisions of Article 6 sub clause "B" of Legislative Decree No 689,The Working Contract dated June 1St 2004 entered
into by DOE RUN PERU S.R.L. and ALBERT BRUCE NEIL, Canadian citizen and consisting of three (3) clauses is approved.

|File No 059491-04
(One illegible signature)
Carlos Fernando Flores Bertalmid
Assistant Director |  | Registry No 01058-04
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------



QuickLinks
§ 1203b.107 Use of firearms. ( a ) If it becomes necessary to use a firearm in any of the circumstances described in § 1203b.106, NASA security force personnel shall comply with the following precautions whenever possible: ( 1 ) Give an order to halt or desist before firing.
( 2 ) Do not fire if shots are likely to harm innocent bystanders.
( 3 ) Shoot to stop.
( b ) Warning shots are not authorized.
( c ) In the event that a security force personnel discharges a weapon while in a duty status: ( 1 ) The incident shall be reported to the Center Chief of Security who, in turn, will report it to the NASA Assistant Administrator for Protective Services as expeditiously as possible, with as many details supplied as are available.
( 2 ) The officer shall be promptly suspended from duty with pay or reassigned to other duties not involving the use of a firearm, as the Center Director or the Assistant Administrator for Protective Services deems appropriate, pending investigation of the incident.
( 3 ) The cognizant Center Director, or for incidents occurring at NASA Headquarters, the Executive Director for Headquarters Operations, shall appoint an investigating officer to conduct a thorough investigation of the incident. Additional personnel may also be appointed, as needed to assist the investigating officer. Upon conclusion of the investigation, the investigating officer shall submit a written report of findings and recommendations to the appropriate Installation Director or the Assistant Administrator for Protective Services.
( 4 ) Upon conclusion of the investigation, the Center Director or the Assistant Administrator for Protective Services, with the advice of Counsel, shall determine the disposition appropriate to the case.
( d ) Firearms will be periodically inspected and kept in good working order by a qualified gunsmith. Ammunition, holsters, and related equipment will be periodically inspected for deterioration and kept in good working order. Firearms and ammunition will be securely stored separately in locked containers. Firearms will not be stored in a loaded condition. Neither firearms nor ammunition will be stored in the same containers as money, drugs, precious materials, or classified information. NASA Headquarters and each Installation shall adopt procedures for the maintenance of records with respect to the issuance of firearms and ammunition.
[57 FR 4926, Feb. 11, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 5263, Jan. 21, 1993; 78 FR 5125, Jan. 24, 2013]
#### WILLIAM APELT v. ALBERT E. MELIN AND OTHERS.1

December 22, 1916.

Nos. 19,983—(112).

Dismissal of appeal.

Appeal dismissed because record did not contain the order appealed from [Reporter.]

Action in the municipal court of Hennepin county upon a promissory note. From an order, Hale, J., sustaining a demurrer in favor of plaintiff and against defendants, defendants appealed.

Dismissed.

*E. Luther Melin,*for appellants.

*John G. Priebe,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 160 N. W. 486.

Per Curiam.

Defendants appeal “from the order rendered by Judge Hale in the district Court of the Fourth Judicial District on the 6th day of May, 1916, sustaining the demurrer in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants therein.” The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the record discloses no such order.
Exhibit 21.1

The following is a list of Avalons subsidiaries except for unnamed subsidiaries which considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.



|                                           |  |                       
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|Subsidiary Name                            |  | State of Incorporation
| American Landfill Management, Inc.       |  | Ohio                  
|American Construction Supply, Inc.         |  | Ohio                  
| American Waste Management Services, Inc. |  | Ohio                  
| Avalon Golf and Country Club, Inc.       |  | Ohio                  
| Avalon Lakes Golf, Inc.                  |  | Ohio                  
| Avalon Travel, Inc.                      |  | Ohio                  
| TBG, Inc.                                |  | Ohio                  
| Avalon Country Club at Sharon, Inc.      |  | Pennsylvania          
| Havana Cigar Company                     |  | Pennsylvania          

Parent/subsidiary relationships are indicated by indentations. In each case, 100% of the voting securities of each
of the subsidiaries is owned by the indicated parent of such subsidiary.
#### WILLIAMSON v. HART.

No. 32864.

Oct. 28, 1947.

*186 P. 2d*71.

C. H. Bowie and Garvin *&*Shumate, all of Pauls Valley, for plaintiff in error.

Walter Dean Hart and Haskell Paul, both of Pauls Valley, and Twyford, Smith & Crowe, of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

DAVISON, V.C.J.

In this action Walter L. Hart, as plaintiff, seeks to quiet his title to certain lands in Garvin county and to cancel a resale tax' deed thereto, which is the foundation of the alleged title of the defendant, A. V. Williamson.

One of the irregularities in the tax resale procedure relied on by plaintiff was the fact that the property was sold in May, 1940, pursuant to advertisement beginning April 11th. Included in the amount for which the property was advertised and sold was the entire levy for the year 1939. The last quarter of these taxes did not become delinquent until May 1st, under the provisions of 68 O.S. 1941 §351. This court has held that, where the amount for which the property is advertised and sold includes an item of tax which does not become delinquent until after the first publication of notice of resale, the procedure is ineffective to give the county treasurer authority to sell the same and renders the resale tax deed based thereon void. House v. Mainka et al., 196 Okla. 174, 163 P. 2d 225; Sarkeys v. Evans, 197 Okla. 304, 170 P. 2d 229; Carman v. McMahan et al., 198 Okla. 367, 178 P. 2d 626.

The plaintiff alleged in his petition that the defendant was claiming some adverse title, the nature and extent of which was unknown. Defendant, by way of answer and cross-petition, set up the tax resale of the property and his subsequent acquisition of the tax title. In contravention of these allegations, plaintiff in his reply, asserted “that said sale was made for a sum different than the amount of taxes due against said lands at the time of said sale.”

At all times in the trial defendant contended that the allegation in the reply was a variance1 from the allegations in the petition and was not sufficient to authorize the introduction of testimony in support of the proposition hereinabove discussed. Plaintiff’s general allegations in the petition against the defendant stated a cause of action and there is no inconsistency between it and the reply. This situation is almost identical to that presented in the *329case of McGrath v. Majors, 179 Okla. 500, 66 P. 2d 915, and the holding of this court therein is determinative of the question here raised.

The judgment of the trial court canceling the resale tax deed and quieting plaintiff’s title was proper.

Judgment affirmed.

RILEY, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. HURST, C. J., dissents.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

                          GLOBAL ELECTION SYSTEMS INC.
                         Computation of Per-Share Income
                              Treasury Stock Method

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Period Ended   Period Ended
                                                  June 30, 1999   June 30, 1998

                                                  Twelve Months   Twelve Months
<S>                                                <C>             <C>
Weighted average number of share outstanding         18,483,264     16,773,928

Total common and common equivalent shares            20,123,699     18,210,595

Net Income for the period                           $   706,045   $  4,037,546

Weighted average number of share outstanding         18,483,264     16,773,928

Earnings per share - basic                          $      0.04   $       0.24

Net Income for the period                           $   706,045   $  4,037,546

Total common and common equivalent shares            20,123,699     18,210,595

Earnings per share - fully diluted                  $      0.04   $       0.22

Earnings per share:
</TABLE>

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income for the period
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.

Fully diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income for the
period by the common and common equivalent shares outstanding for the period.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO**

**RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

 

I, Jean F.H.P. Mandeville, Chief Financial Officer of Global Crossing Limited, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Global Crossing Limited; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

(b) [Paragraph omitted aspermitted by SEC Release 33-8238 (June 5, 2003).] 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:March 16, 2005 

 

 

/s/    Jean F.H.P. Mandeville 

----