alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1264.115 Disqualification of reviewing official or presiding officer. ( a ) A reviewing official or presiding officer in a particular case may disqualify himself or herself at any time.
( b ) A party may file with the presiding officer a motion for disqualification of a reviewing official or a presiding officer. Such motion shall be accompanied by an affidavit alleging personal bias or other reason for disqualification.
( c ) Such motion and affidavit shall be filed promptly upon the party's discovery of reasons for disqualification, or such objections shall be deemed waived.
( d ) Such affidavit shall state specific facts that support the party's belief that personal bias or other reason for disqualification exists and the time and circumstances of the party's discovery of such facts. It shall be accompanied by a certificate of the representative of record that it is made in good faith.
( e ) Upon the filing of such a motion and affidavit, the presiding officer shall proceed no further in the case until the matter of disqualification is resolved in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section.
( f ) ( 1 ) If the presiding officer determines that a reviewing official is disqualified, the presiding officer shall dismiss the complaint without prejudice.
( 2 ) If the presiding officer disqualifies himself or herself, the case shall be reassigned promptly to another presiding officer.
( 3 ) If the presiding officer denies a motion to disqualify, the authority head may determine the matter only as part of his or her review of the initial decision upon appeal, if any.
§ 152.405 Assurances. The following assurances shall be included in each application for financial assistance under this part: ( a ) *Assurance.* The grantee assures that it will undertake an affirmative action program, as required by 14 CFR part 152, subpart E, to ensure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, or sex, be excluded from participating in any employment, contracting, or leasing activities covered in 14 CFR part 152, subpart E. The grantee assures that no person shall be excluded, on these grounds, from participating in or receiving the services or benefits of any program or activity covered by this subpart. The grantee assures that it will require that its covered organizations provide assurances to the grantee that they similarly will undertake affirmative action programs and that they will require assurances from their suborganizations, as required by 14 CFR part 152, subpart E, to the same effect.
( b ) *Assurance.* The grantee agrees to comply with any affirmative action plan or steps for equal employment opportunity required by 14 CFR part 152, subpart E, as part of the affirmative action program, and by any Federal, State, or local agency or court, including those resulting from a conciliation agreement, a consent decree, court order, or similar mechanism. The grantee agrees that State or local affirmative action plans will be used in lieu of any affirmative action plan or steps required by 14 CFR part 152, subpart E, only when they fully meet the standards set forth in 14 CFR 152.409. The grantee agrees to obtain a similar assurance from its covered organizations, and to cause them to require a similar assurance of their covered suborganizations, as required by 14 CFR part 152, subpart E.
#### § 1259.403 Limitations.

The same limitations shall apply as stated in § 1259.203.

[82 FR 35441, July 31, 2017]
```

[110th Congress Public Law 51]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ051.110]
Public Law 110-51
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
   1965, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: July 31, 2007 -  [S. 1868]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Second Higher 
Education Extension Act of 2007.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 20 USC 1001 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Second Higher Education Extension Act 
of 2007''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

    Section 2(a) of the Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 (Public 
Law 109-81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended by striking ``July 31, 
2007'' and inserting ``October 31, 2007''.
SEC. 3. <<NOTE: 20 USC 1001 note.>> RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act, or in the Higher Education Extension Act of 
2005 as amended by this Act, shall be construed to limit or otherwise 
alter the authorizations of appropriations for, or the durations of, 
programs contained in the amendments made by the Higher Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-171) to the provisions of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection Act of 
2004.

    Approved July 31, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1868:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            July 24, considered and passed Senate.
            July 25, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
§ 121.639 Fuel supply: All domestic operations. No person may dispatch or take off an airplane unless it has enough fuel— ( a ) To fly to the airport to which it is dispatched;
( b ) Thereafter, to fly to and land at the most distant alternate airport (where required) for the airport to which dispatched; and
( c ) Thereafter, to fly for 45 minutes at normal cruising fuel consumption or, for certificate holders who are authorized to conduct day VFR operations in their operations specifications and who are operating nontransport category airplanes type certificated after December 31, 1964, to fly for 30 minutes at normal cruising fuel consumption for day VFR operations.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19222, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-251, 60 FR 65935, Dec. 20, 1995]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          40,211
<SECURITIES>                                20,005,728
<RECEIVABLES>                                  494,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,540,327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          500,603
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,039,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,540,327
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284,338
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                284,338
<INCOME-TAX>                                   284,338
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            284,338
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   284,338
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 6949** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. BARRY ELIJAH DAVIS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Marvin J. Garbis , Senior District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00005

- MJG

- 1; 1:08

- cv - 02963

- MJG )

Submitted : June 28 , 2010 Decided: July 15, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam o pinion
. Barry Elijah Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM: Barry Elijah Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motio n and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion . The order s

are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the cons titutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the disposi tive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and arg ument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
221216 SCH ORD RE CLEMENTE ROSA MOT.DOCX VERSION DECEMBER 16, 2022 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF MOTION FILED BY MARÍA A. CLEMENTE ROSA

The Court has received and reviewed the motion (Docket Entry No. 23074 in 

Case No. 17-3283) (the “Motion”) filed by María A. Clemente Rosa (the “Movant”). Opposition 

papers to the Motion must be filed by December 30, 2022. Movant’s reply papers must be filed 

by January 6, 2023. The Court will thereafter take the Motion on submission, unless the Court 

determines that a hearing is necessary.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2022

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number 

and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are 

the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits 

of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto 

Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the 

Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 

(“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as 

Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23082 Filed:12/16/22 Entered:12/16/22 14:24:22 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 135.71 Airworthiness check.

The pilot in command may not begin a flight unless the pilot determines that the airworthiness inspections required by § 91.409 of this chapter, or § 135.419, whichever is applicable, have been made.

[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-32, 54 FR 34332, Aug. 18, 1989]
From: Rahul Pendse <RPendse@trinityconsultants.com>

Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:53 PM

To: Krivo, Stan

Cc: Fortin, Kelly; Land, Eva; Carlson, Sara; Kathryn Maness (Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com) Subject: BlackHawk/BlackHornet Modeling Question
Attachments: BlackHawk Modeling Report

- 08

- 30

- 2013_Class II Results Page.pdf

Hello Stan,

Thanks for a phone call to discuss your question regarding the air dispersion modeling analyses for BlackHawk/BlackHornet PSD

- Title V application. Per our discussion, I am sending this email to document our conversation for records. Your question was related to compliance with PM 10 SIL for annual averaging period.

As shown in Table 6

- 4 of the air dispersion modeling report, PM 10 concentration (in μg/m 3 ) results for

2 4

- hour averaging period are 0.14, 0.10, and 0.13 for 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively. PM 10 concentrations for annual averaging period are expected to be equal or less than the PM 10 concentrations for 24

- hour averaging period. Since PM 10 concentration re sults for 24

- hour averaging period are less than PM 10 SIL for annual averaging period, no separate model runs for PM 10 annual averaging period would be necessary to demonstrate less than significant impact on an annual basis.

Regardless, I was able to re trieve the results for PM 10 concentrations for an annual averaging period.
Please find the revised Table 6

- 4 attached herewith. The PM 10 concentrations for annual averaging period are highlighted in yellow background. Please let me know if you have any que stion or need
further clarification.

Thank you!
Rahul



### ............................................................................................. Rahul Pendse Manager of Consulting Services Trinity Consultants

– Baton Rouge 301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825
Office: 225

- 346

- 4003 | M obile: 714

- 454

- 0518
Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com



### .............................................................................................

_________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is i ntended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
enti ties other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any

### computer.

_________________________________________________________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          18,121
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                21,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    132,302
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          87,323
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            86,966
<LOANS>                                        596,763
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 878,823
<DEPOSITS>                                     797,897
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,784
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,428
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 878,823
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 26,454
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,140
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   651
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                34,245
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              17,172
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,172
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,073
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  15
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,154
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,154
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,315
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.08
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,454
<LOANS-PAST>                                        73
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   564
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,810
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,231
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      865
<RECOVERIES>                                       367
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,833
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,833
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby  certify that,  to my knowledge,  the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended March 31, 2005:

     1. fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:    May 16, 2005                   By:     /s/ Boyd Pearce
                                                ---------------
                                                Boyd Pearce, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  has  been  provided  to the  Company,  and  will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
U.S. Nuclear Refueling Outage DaysAverage10410688959266 66815140443733404238394038411990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008Source: 1990-98 EUCG, 1999-2009 Ventyx VelocitySuite / Nuclear Regulatory CommissionUpdated: 5/10
This data directory and user guide lists (or inventories, catalogs, etc.) explains

the data used in developing EPA’s proposed rule, Water Quality Standards for

the State of Florida’s Estuaries, Coastal Waters, and South Florida Inland Flowing

Waters. The complete datasetis available for review at the EPA Docket Center,

Public Reading Room. To view or receive a copy of the dataset, contact the EPA

Docket Center as follows:

In person/writing:

EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Docket Center

1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334

Washington, DC 20004

By Telephone:

202­566­1744

By Fax:

202­566­ 9744

By Email:

docket­customerservice@epa.gov
Record of Discussion ~01~ -( f -oo:L -40 Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -lrl) 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, A TA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGAN IZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Piper Ken Fraley Multiple dates Effectivity. costs for 

compliance, history of 

Piper Service Bulletins 

and FAA test 

requirements. 

Other/ Additional Information: 

10
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-31057 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAURICE THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:01-CR-20066-1

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Maurice Thomas has filed a

motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Thomas has not filed a response. 

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.