alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1253.110 Remedial and affirmative action and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* If the designated agency official finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, such recipient shall take such remedial action as the designated agency official deems necessary to overcome the effects of such discrimination.
( b ) *Affirmative action.* In the absence of a finding of discrimination on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, a recipient may take affirmative action consistent with law to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation therein by persons of a particular sex. Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted to alter any affirmative action obligations that a recipient may have under Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12086, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264.
( c ) *Self-evaluation.* Each recipient education institution shall, within one year of September 29, 2000: ( 1 ) Evaluate, in terms of the requirements of these Title IX regulations, its current policies and practices and the effects thereof concerning admission of students, treatment of students, and employment of both academic and non-academic personnel working in connection with the recipient's education program or activity;
( 2 ) Modify any of these policies and practices that do not or may not meet the requirements of these Title IX regulations; and
( 3 ) Take appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted or may have resulted from adherence to these policies and practices.
( d ) *Availability of self-evaluation and related materials.* Recipients shall maintain on file for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c) of this section, and shall provide to the designated agency official upon request, a description of any modifications made pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section and of any remedial steps taken pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
§ 1230.107 IRB membership. ( a ) Each IRB shall have at least five members, with varying backgrounds to promote complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted by the institution. The IRB shall be sufficiently qualified through the experience and expertise of its members (professional competence), and the diversity of its members, including race, gender, and cultural backgrounds and sensitivity to such issues as community attitudes, to promote respect for its advice and counsel in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects. The IRB shall be able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments (including policies and resources) and regulations, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice. The IRB shall therefore include persons knowledgeable in these areas. If an IRB regularly reviews research that involves a category of subjects that is vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as children, prisoners, individuals with impaired decision-making capacity, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, consideration shall be given to the inclusion of one or more individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these categories of subjects.
( b ) Each IRB shall include at least one member whose primary concerns are in scientific areas and at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas.
( c ) Each IRB shall include at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution and who is not part of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution.
( d ) No IRB may have a member participate in the IRB's initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflicting interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB.
( e ) An IRB may, in its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist in the review of issues that require expertise beyond or in addition to that available on the IRB. These individuals may not vote with the IRB.
§ 620.15 Notice of significant or material events. When a Farm Credit bank or association determines that it has a significant or material event, the institution must prepare and provide to its shareholders and the Farm Credit Administration a notice disclosing the event(s). ( a ) Each bank and association board of directors must establish and maintain a policy identifying the categories and types of events that may result in a notice under this section. At a minimum, events covered under this provision include significant events defined in § 620.1(q) and material events defined in § 620.1(h). The policy must identify how the significance or materiality of an event will be determined.
( b ) A notice issued under this section must be made as soon as possible, but not later than 90 days after occurrence of the event. ( 1 ) Each institution must electronically provide the notice to the Farm Credit Administration at the same time as distribution of the notice to shareholders.
( 2 ) Delivery of the notice to shareholders may be accomplished by direct communications with the shareholders, posting the notice on the institution's Web site, as part of the quarterly report to shareholders, or by publishing the notice in any publication with circulation wide enough to reasonably assure that all of the institution's shareholders have access to the information in a timely manner. No matter how the notice is distributed, it must comply with all the provisions of this section.
( c ) Every notice must be dated and signed in a manner similar to the requirements of § 620.3(b).
( d ) The information required to be included in a notice issued under this section must be conspicuous, easily understandable, complete, accurate, and not misleading.
( e ) A Farm Credit System institution may be required to issue a notice under this section at the direction of the Farm Credit Administration.
[77 FR 60600, Oct. 3, 2012]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3830 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to authorize the issuance of United 

States Pandemic Bonds to aid in the funding of relief efforts related 

to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2020 

Mr. SULLIVAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to authorize the 

issuance of United States Pandemic Bonds to aid in 

the funding of relief efforts related to coronavirus disease 

2019 (COVID–19). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Pan5 demic Relief Bonds Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 The purpose of this Act is to authorize the issuance 

8 of United States Pandemic Bonds to aid in the funding 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3830 IS

1 of relief efforts related to coronavirus disease 2019 

2 (COVID–19). 

3 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

4 It is the sense of Congress that the Department of 

5 the Treasury should— 

6 (1) consider offering Treasury bonds with ma7 turity dates longer than 30 years; and 

8 (2) significantly increase utilization of long9 term debt when interest rates on 30-year Treasury 

10 bonds are below 2 percent. 

11 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF UNITED 

12 STATES PANDEMIC BONDS. 

13 Section 3102 of title 31, United States Code, is 

14 amended by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(f) ISSUANCE OF UNITED STATES PANDEMIC

16 BONDS.— 

17 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized 

18 to issue bonds under this section, to be known as 

19 ‘United States Pandemic Relief Bonds’, to aid in the 

20 funding of relief efforts related to coronavirus dis21 ease 2019 (COVID–19). 

22 ‘‘(2) FORM.—The bonds authorized by para23 graph (1) shall be in such form and denominations, 

24 and shall be subject to such terms and conditions of 

25 issue, conversion, redemption, maturation, including 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3830 IS

1 for terms longer than 30 years, payment, and rate 

2 of interest as the Secretary may prescribe. 

3 ‘‘(3) MARKETING.—The Secretary shall carry 

4 out a program to encourage sales of United States 

5 Pandemic Relief Bonds, including activities to facili6 tate the purchase of such bonds. 

7 ‘‘(4) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

8 There is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 

9 for carrying out the marketing program described in 

10 paragraph (3).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,432
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                25,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    134,366
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          85,347
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            84,046
<LOANS>                                        593,598
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 877,667
<DEPOSITS>                                     794,890
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,452
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,428
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,897
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 877,667
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,138
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,448
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   393
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,979
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,567
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,567
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,412
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,467
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,467
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.03
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,285
<LOANS-PAST>                                       198
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   568
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,161
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,231
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      429
<RECOVERIES>                                        19
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,421
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,421
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
                          CERTIFICATION

I, James Ivchenko, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue  statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact  necessary  to make the statements made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were   made,   not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and
other  financial  information included  in  this  report,  fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,  and  for,
the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls  and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules  13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

           (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report  is
being prepared;

           (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by
this report based on such evaluation; and

           (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting  that
occurred  during the small business issuer's most  recent  fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely  to
materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal  control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and  I  have  disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation  of
internal  control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)    All   significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal  control  over
financial  reporting  which are reasonable  likely  to  adversely
affect  the  small business issuer's ability to record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in  the
small   business   issuer's  internal  control   over   financial
reporting.



Dated: January 16, 2007           By:   /s/  James Ivchenko
                                  James Ivchenko,
                                  President
                                  (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the
"Form 10-K") of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, Mark A. Wendel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Date: March 14, 2011

/s/ MARK A. WENDEL Mark A. Wendel Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Ohio State University; Notice of Decision on Application for 
Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope

    This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 00-005. Applicant: Ohio State University, Wooster, 
OH 44691. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model H-7500-1. 
Manufacturer: Hitachi Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 65 FR 
14245, March 16, 2000. Order Date: October 19, 1999.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as the instrument is intended to be used, was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was 
ordered. Reasons: The foreign instrument is a conventional transmission 
electron microscope (CTEM) and is intended for research or scientific 
educational uses requiring a CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or any other 
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in 
the United States at the time of order of the instrument.

Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 00-10417 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### § 1261.415 Execution of releases.

Upon receipt of full payment of a claim, or the amount in compromise of a claim as determined pursuant to § 1261.414, the official designated in § 1261.402 will prepare and execute, on behalf of the United States, an appropriate release, which shall include the provision that it shall be void if procured by fraud, misrepresentation, the presentation of a false claim, or mutual mistake of fact.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-AUGUST 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q-2ND QUARTER FISCAL 1999-LAROCHE INDUSTRIES, INC.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,945
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                       521
<INVENTORY>                                     33,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,420
<PP&E>                                         335,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                (113,593)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 397,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,021
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   397,425
<SALES>                                        100,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,725
<CGS>                                           88,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,199)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,199)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1602

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Janice L. Hankey, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 5, 2002 Filed: September 10, 2002

___________ Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Janice Hankey appeals the district court’s 1 revocation of her probation and imposition of a 70-month term of imprisonment. On appeal, she argues that there was insufficient evidence to revoke her probation and that the district court erred in imposing a sentence in excess of the Guidelines imprisonment range recommended by the Chapter 7 policy statement. After careful review of the record, we affirm.-2- The district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking Hankey’s probation, because the undisputed evidence at the revocation hearing showed that she had failed to comply with her probation conditions. See United States v. Leigh , 276 F.3d 1011, 1012 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (standard of review); United States v. Goeller , 807 F.2d 749, 751 (8th Cir. 1986). Further, the district court did not err in sentencing Hankey to 70 months imprisonment, because this sentence was within the range of sentences that initially could have been imposed. See U.S.S.G. Ch.7, Pt.A(2)(a); United States v. Iversen , 90 F.3d 1340, 1345 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Two Hundred and Thirty-Forth Omnibus Objection

Exhibit A - No Basis Claims

NAME DATE FILED DEBTOR CLAIM #

ASSERTED CLAIM 

CASE NUMBER AMOUNT

 1 ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY 04/03/2018 17 BK 03283-LTS Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 3538

1314 DOUGLAS ST

OMAHA, NE 68102

Undetermined*

Reason: Proof of Claim does not provide a basis for asserting a claim against the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

TOTAL Undetermined*

*Indicates claim contains unliquidated and/or undetermined amounts 1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23846-1 Filed:03/22/23 Entered:03/22/23 14:03:52 Desc:

Exhibit A Two Hundred and Thirty-Forth Omnibus Objection Exhibit A - No Basis C Page 1 of 1
§ 145.217 Contract maintenance. ( a ) A certificated repair station may contract a maintenance function pertaining to an article to an outside source provided— ( 1 ) The FAA approves the maintenance function to be contracted to the outside source; and
( 2 ) The repair station maintains and makes available to its responsible Flight Standards office, in a format acceptable to the FAA, the following information: ( i ) The maintenance functions contracted to each outside facility; and
( ii ) The name of each outside facility to whom the repair station contracts maintenance functions and the type of certificate and ratings, if any, held by each facility.
( b ) A certificated repair station may contract a maintenance function pertaining to an article to a noncertificated person provided— ( 1 ) The noncertificated person follows a quality control system equivalent to the system followed by the certificated repair station;
( 2 ) The certificated repair station remains directly in charge of the work performed by the noncertificated person; and
( 3 ) The certificated repair station verifies, by test and/or inspection, that the work has been performed satisfactorily by the noncertificated person and that the article is airworthy before approving it for return to service.
( c ) A certificated repair station may not provide only approval for return to service of a complete type-certificated product following contract maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations.
[Docket No. FAA-1999-5836, 66 FR 41117, Aug. 6, 2001, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 145-32, 83 FR 9176, Mar. 5, 2018]