alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ending October 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Gary Pokrassa, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/Gary Pokrassa
----------------
Gary Pokrassa,
Chief Financial Officer

December 12, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1996 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,421,723
<SECURITIES>                                   686,182
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,927,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,338,192
<INVENTORY>                                    160,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,530,336
<PP&E>                                       2,128,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                 891,943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,979,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,066,537
<BONDS>                                        558,055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       723,556
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,143,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,979,887
<SALES>                                      3,609,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,769,265
<CGS>                                          324,925
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,072,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               385,077
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                696,397
<INCOME-TAX>                                   250,327
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            446,070
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   446,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
The current Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act process is in conflict and insufficient 

in protecting water quality of rivers and streams that are routinely comprised of significant 

amounts of wastewater effluent or effluent dominated. The City of Thornton would encourage 

EPA to either change the Clean Water Act or the Safe Drinking Water Act regulatory process to 

address these conflicts regarding water quality standards compliance schedules. In addition

EPA needs to develop criteria which define the appropriate allocation of treatment cost 

between wastewater dischargers and drinking water suppliers and enhance the protection of 

public drinking water supplies. 

Bud Hart

City of Thornton
§ 1262.308 Agency review. ( a ) Within 30 calendar days of the receipt of the adjudicative officer's initial decision on the fee application, either the applicant or agency counsel may seek Agency review of the decision; or, the NASA Administrator, upon the recommendation of the General Counsel or other designee, may decide to review the decision based on the record. Whether to review a decision is solely a matter within the discretion of the NASA Administrator. A 15-day notice of such review will be given the applicant and agency counsel, and a determination made not later than 45 days from the date of notice. The Administrator may make a final determination concerning the application or remand the application to the adjudicative officer for further proceedings.
( b ) If neither the applicant nor agency counsel seek review, and the NASA Administrator does not on own initiative take a review, the adjudicative officer's initial decision on the fee application shall be the final administrative decision of the Agency 45 days after it is issued.
#### § 303.1 Scope.

Subpart A prescribes the general procedures for submitting filings to the FDIC which are required by statute or regulation. This subpart also prescribes the procedures to be followed by the FDIC, applicants and interested parties during the process of considering a filing, including public notice and comment. This subpart explains the availability of expedited processing for eligible depository institutions (defined in § 303.2(r)). Certain terms used throughout this part are also defined in this subpart.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BACKYARD BURGERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH BALANCE SHEET AT JANUARY 3, 1998 AND THE 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE 53 WEEKS ENDED JANUARY 3, 1998
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                           1,328
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      384<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,961
<PP&E>                                           9,451<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,656
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,253
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,155
<SALES>                                         24,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,034
<CGS>                                            7,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   163
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    162
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                162
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
<FN>
<F1>ASSET VALUES REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 06-15-00077-CV

______________________________________________________________________________

IN THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

______________________________________________________________________________

Jamil Sayfi d/b/a Farmers Truck Center

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

Respondent. ______________________________________________________________________________ ON APPEAL FROM THE

53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

THE HONORABLE JUDGE SCOTT H. JENKINS PRESIDING

TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. D-1-GV-08-001425

_____________________________________________________________________________ MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

______________________________________________________________________________ TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Appellant, Jamil Sayfi d/b/a Farmers Truck Center, respectfully requests that this Court

dismiss Appellant’s appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), because

Appellant no longer wishes to pursue an appeal of the underlying judgment. The present appeal

is accordingly moot.

Respectfully submitted,

James D. Rosenblatt

james@rosenblattlawfirm.com

Texas Bar No. 00788320

Tiffanie S. Clausewitz

tiffanie@rosenblattlawfirm.com

Texas Bar No. 24051936

Lauren M. Horne

ACCEPTED

06-15-00077-cv

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

10/6/2015 3:53:42 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 10/6/2015 3:53:42 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
lauren@rosenblattlawfirm.com

Texas Bar No. 24066330

THE ROSENBLATT LAW FIRM, P.C.

16719 Huebner Road, Bldg 1

San Antonio, Texas 78248

Tele: (210) 562-2900

Fax: (210) 562-2929

Certificate of Service

I certify that on October 6, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on

the following counsel of record, pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Mr. Mark A. Steinbach

Office of the Attorney General

P.O. Box 12548

Austin, Texas 78711-2548

mark.steinbach@texasattorneygeneral.gov

/s/ Lauren M. Horne

Lauren M. Horne
Editorial Note on Subpart I of Part 121
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart I of part 121 appear at 60 FR 65928, Dec. 20, 1995.

§ 121.187 Airplanes: Reciprocating engine-powered: Landing limitations: Alternate airport. ( a ) No person may list an airport as an alternate airport in a dispatch or flight release unless the airplane (at the weight anticipated at the time of arrival at the airport), based on the assumptions in § 121.185, can be brought to a full stop landing, within 70 percent of the effective length of the runway.
( b ) This section does not apply to large nontransport category airplanes operated under § 121.173(c).
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19198, Dec. 31, 1964; 30 FR 130, Jan. 7, 1965, as amended by Amdt. 121-251, 60 FR 65928, Dec. 20, 1995]
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Cosine Communications, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Terry
        R. Gibson, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
        Terry R.
        Gibson
 Terry
        R.
        Gibson
 Director,
        Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 March
        24,
        2006
§ 1264.108 Answer. ( a ) The defendant may request a hearing by filing an answer with the reviewing official within 30 days of service of the complaint. An answer shall be deemed to be a request for hearing.
( b ) In the answer, the defendant— ( 1 ) Shall admit or deny each of the allegations of liability made in the complaint;
( 2 ) Shall state any defense on which the defendant intends to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why the defendant contends that the penalties and assessments should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Shall state the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by the defendant to act as defendant's representative, if any.
( c ) If the defendant is unable to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section within the time provided, the defendant may, before the expiration of 30 days from service of the complaint, file with the reviewing official a general answer denying liability and requesting a hearing, and a request for an extension of time within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. The reviewing official, as provided in § 1264.110, shall file promptly with the presiding officer the complaint, the general answer denying liability, and the request for an extension of time. For good cause shown, the presiding officer may grant the defendant up to 30 additional days within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
[52 FR 39498, Oct. 22, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 600, Jan. 9, 1989]
§ 121.101 Weather reporting facilities. ( a ) Each certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations must show that enough weather reporting services are available along each route to ensure weather reports and forecasts necessary for the operation.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, no certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations may use any weather report to control flight unless— ( 1 ) For operations within the 48 contiguous States and the District of Columbia, it was prepared by the U.S. National Weather Service or a source approved by the U.S. National Weather Service; or
( 2 ) For operations conducted outside the 48 contiguous States and the District of Columbia, it was prepared by a source approved by the Administrator.
( c ) Each certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations that uses forecasts to control flight movements shall use forecasts prepared from weather reports specified in paragraph (b) of this section and from any source approved under its system adopted pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) Each certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations shall adopt and put into use an approved system for obtaining forecasts and reports of adverse weather phenomena, such as clear air turbulence, thunderstorms, and low altitude wind shear, that may affect safety of flight on each route to be flown and at each airport to be used.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19194, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-27, 36 FR 13911, July 28, 1971; Amdt. 121-134, 42 FR 27573, May 31, 1977; Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2610, Jan. 26, 1996]
§ 137.31 Aircraft requirements. No person may operate an aircraft unless that aircraft— ( a ) Meets the requirements of § 137.19(d); and
( b ) Is equipped with a suitable and properly installed shoulder harness for use by each pilot.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3766 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3766

   To provide for tax-exempt financing for United Nations facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2004

Mr. Houghton (for himself and Mr. Payne) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for tax-exempt financing for United Nations facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``United Nations Facility Financing 
Restoration Act''.

SEC. 2. TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING FOR UNITED NATIONS FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 145 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Special Rule Relating to Bonds for United Nations 
Facilities.--
            ``(1) In general.--For purposes of this part, the term 
        `qualified 501(c)(3) bond' includes a bond issued as part of an 
        issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are used 
        to provide a United Nations facility described in paragraph 
        (2). Such bonds need not satisfy the requirements of paragraphs 
        (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
            ``(2) United nations facility.--For purposes of paragraph 
        (1), the term `United Nations facility' means property used by 
        the United Nations or any agency or instrumentality thereof, 
        whether or not constituting a 501(c)(3) organization, so long 
        as--
                    ``(A) such property is used in conjunction with, 
                but is outside, the United Nations headquarters 
                district, as defined in Annex 1 to the Agreement 
                between the United Nations and the United States of 
                America, as approved August 4, 1947; and
                    ``(B) costs for such United Nations facility are 
                first incurred after April 1, 2002.
            ``(3) Financing not treated as loan.--For purposes of 
        section 148, financing of such United Nations facility shall 
        not be treated as a loan to the United Nations or otherwise by 
        reason of unencumbered ownership by the United Nations of such 
        United Nations facility when such bond is no longer 
        outstanding.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3731 

To amend title VII of the Social Security Act to provide for a single point 

of contact at the Social Security Administration for individuals who 

are victims of identity theft. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2020 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. PORTMAN, Ms. HASSAN, Ms. 

COLLINS, Mr. WYDEN, Mrs. LOEFFLER, Mr. CASEY, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. 

BROWN, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. CARPER, Mr. YOUNG, Mrs. MURRAY, 

Mr. KING, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. PETERS, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title VII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a single point of contact at the Social Security Administration for individuals who are victims of identity 

theft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Social Secu5 rity’s Service to Victims of Identity Theft Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3731 IS

1 SEC. 2. SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT FOR IDENTITY THEFT 

2 VICTIMS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title VII of the Social Security 

4 Act (42 U.S.C. 901 et seq.) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 714. SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT FOR IDENTITY 

7 THEFT VICTIMS. 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of Social Se9 curity shall establish and implement procedures to ensure 

10 that any individual whose social security account number 

11 has been misused (such as to fraudulently obtain benefits 

12 under title II, VIII, or XVI of this Act, or in a manner 

13 that affects an individual’s records at the Social Security 

14 Administration, or in a manner that prompts the indi15 vidual to request a new social security account number) 

16 has a single point of contact at the Social Security Admin17 istration throughout the resolution of the individual’s case. 

18 The single point of contact shall track the individual’s case 

19 to completion and coordinate with other units to resolve 

20 issues as quickly as possible. 

21 ‘‘(b) SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT.— 

22 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of subsection 

23 (a), the single point of contact shall consist of a 

24 team or subset of specially trained employees who— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3731 IS

1 ‘‘(A) have the ability to coordinate with 

2 other units to resolve the issues involved in the 

3 individual’s case, and 

4 ‘‘(B) shall be accountable for the case until 

5 its resolution. 

6 ‘‘(2) TEAM OR SUBSET.—The employees in7 cluded within the team or subset described in para8 graph (1) may change as required to meet the needs 

9 of the Social Security Administration, provided that 

10 procedures have been established to— 

11 ‘‘(A) ensure continuity of records and case 

12 history, and 

13 ‘‘(B) notify the individual when appro14 priate.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect 180 days after the date 

17 of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership

Certification of Periodic Financial Report
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Yager/Kuester Public
Fund Limited Partnership (the Partnership) certify that the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal period ending September 30, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information obtained in that Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|     |  |          |  |     |  |                                             
|---- |  | -------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date |  | 11/19/03 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dexter R. Yager, Sr.Dexter R. Yager, Sr.
|    
|     |  |          |  |    
|    
|Date |  | 11/19/03 |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas K. EmeryThomas K. Emery
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Zaxis International Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ivo Heiden, CEO and CFO ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ivo Heiden

Ivo HeidenCEO and CFODated: August 14, 2009

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zaxis International Inc. and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.