alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Earthquake Hazards Program

##### U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 2006-1277Version 1.0

# Report of the Workshop on Extreme Ground Motions at Yucca Mountain, August 23-25, 2004

### *By* T.C. Hanks, Chair, N.A. Abrahamson, M. Board, D.M. Boore, J.N. Brune, and C.A. Cornell, Workshop Committee

#### 2006

This Workshop has its origins in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) for Yucca Mountain, the designated site of the underground repository for the nation's high-level radioactive waste. In 1998 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC) developed guidelines for PSHA which were published as *NUREG/CR-6372*, "Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: guidance on uncertainty and the use of experts," (SSHAC, 1997). This Level-4 study was the most complicated and complex PSHA ever undertaken at the time. The procedures, methods, and results of this PSHA are described in Stepp et al. (2001), mostly in the context of a probability of exceedance (hazard) of 10-4/yr for ground motion at Site A, a hypothetical, reference rock outcrop site at the elevation of the proposed emplacement drifts within the mountain. Analysis and inclusion of both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty were significant and time-consuming aspects of the study, which took place over three years and involved several dozen scientists, engineers, and analysts. 

Download the entire report as a 234-page PDF file (of2006-1277.pdf; 21.8 MB)

Download just the 29 pages of introductory material (of2006-1277_intro_only.pdf; 1.3 MB)

Go to the Appendixes folder that contains all of the separate papers (31 items that total 30.6 MB)

For questions about the content of this report, contact Tom Hanks

Version history

----

Download a copy of the latest version of Adobe Reader for free.

| Help | PDF help | Publications main page || Western Open-File Reports for 2006 || Geologic Division | Earthquake Hazards Program  |
This report is available only on the Web

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1277/	Page Contact Information: Michael Diggles	Page Last Modified: October 30, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 **Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Mack I. Whittle, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of The South Financial Group, Inc. (“TSFG”) certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 of TSFG (the “Report”): 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TSFG. 

 

 

/s/  Mack I. Whittle, Jr.   

Mack I. Whittle, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

The South Financial Group, Inc.

May 8, 2007

 

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The South Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Florida draft NOI threshold for aquatic plant management:

Herbicide applications that exceed 10 surface acres of water or, applications by one applicator that

exceed a cumulative total of 20 surface acres of water in a single water body during a one year period.

Most of the large

‐ scale herbicide applications for aquatic plant control conducted in Florida lakes and

rivers are developed, contracted, permitted and monitored by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation

Commission (FWC). Permits to control aquatic plants are required by FWC in water bodies that exceed

10 surface acres in size unless they are wholly owned by one person. Most aquatic herbicide treatments

that exceed 10 surface acres in size are for submersed aquatic vegetation, e.g., hydrilla. Most

submersed vegetation problems can be managed with 2 herbicide treatments per year, thus the

reasoning behind a cumulative total of 20 acres. This threshold would capture the large majority of all

aquatic herbicide applications in Florida that are regulated by the FWC. Reducing NPDES Permit

monitoring/reporting requirements for small

‐ scale herbicide applications would allow staff more time to

work with stakeholders to implement environmentally compatible and cost

‐ effective large

‐ scale aquatic

plant management programs.
In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit ____________

No. 05-4525

ISAAC JOHNSON,

Applicant,

v.

BRADLEY J. ROBERT, Warden,

Centralia Correctional Center,

Respondent.

____________

Application for Permission to Initiate

a Second or Successive Collateral Attack

____________

SUBMITTED DECEMBER 9, 2005—DECIDED DECEMBER 15, 2005

____________

Before BAUER, EASTERBROOK, and ROVNER, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM. Isaac Johnson seeks permission to initiate another collateral attack on his conviction and 80-

year sentence for murder. See 28 U.S.C. §2244(b)(3). Although his application is not entirely clear, he relies in

substantial part on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000), and implies that he would invoke Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), which elaborates on how

Apprendi applies to sentencing in state prosecutions.

Apprendi was decided several years ago, and Blakely was

issued on June 24, 2004. Johnson’s application under

§2244(b)(3) was not filed until December 7, 2005, more than

a year later.
2 No. 05-4525

Because 28 U.S.C. §2244(d)(1) establishes a one-year period of limitations, Johnson’s application is too late. The

year usually runs from the date on which the conviction became final, which for Johnson was long before

the Supreme Court decided Apprendi. A proviso in

§2244(d)(1)(C) restarts the clock on “the date on which

the constitutional right asserted was initially recognized by

the Supreme Court, if the right has been newly recognized

by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to

cases on collateral review”. Whether we use Apprendi

or Blakely as the benchmark, “the date on which the

constitutional right asserted was initially recognized by the

Supreme Court” is more than a year before Johnson filed

this application. The Supreme Court held in Dodd v. United

States, 125 S. Ct. 2478 (2005), that a provision in 28 U.S.C.

§2255 materially identical to §2244(d)(1)(C) runs from the

date the right was initially recognized, even if the Court

does not declare that right to be retroactive until later.

Dodd is equally applicable to §2244(d)(1)(C), so there is no

point in authorizing Johnson to file another collateral

attack. Because he waited too long, it is unnecessary to

decide whether his claim would be a substantial one on the

merits.

Johnson adverts to a number of other potential contentions, such as the possibility that his trial lawyer furnished

ineffective assistance, but these likewise would be untimely.

Johnson should have pursued them in his initial federal

collateral attack.

The application is denied.
No. 05-4525 3

A true Copy:

Teste: 

 ________________________________

Clerk of the United States Court of

Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 

USCA-02-C-0072—12-23-05
# Official Journal L 224/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 224 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6530 August 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 224

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6530 August 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1435 of 26 August 2022 amending Annexes II and IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for calcium carbonate, carbon dioxide, cyprodinil and potassium hydrogen carbonate in or on certain products (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1435 of 26 August 2022 amending Annexes II and IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for calcium carbonate, carbon dioxide, cyprodinil and potassium hydrogen carbonate in or on certain products (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 1203.409 Exceptional cases. ( a ) In those cases where a person not authorized to classify information originates or develops information which is believed to require classification, that person must contact the Center's or installation's Information Security Officer in the Protective Services Office to arrange for proper review and safeguarding. Persons other than NASA employees should forward the information to the NASA Central Registry at 300 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20546, Attention: Office of Protective Services.
( b ) Information in which NASA does not have primary interest shall be returned promptly, under appropriate safeguards, to the sender in accordance with § 1203.405.
( c ) Material received from another agency for a NASA security classification determination shall be processed within 90 days. If a classification cannot be determined during that period, the material shall be sent, under appropriate safeguards, to the Director, Information Security Oversight Office, for a determination.
[44 FR 34913, June 18, 1979, as amended at 78 FR 5118, Jan. 24, 2013]
#### § 111.300 Applicability.

This subpart applies to each individual who is employed as a pilot by, or is seeking employment as a pilot with, an operator or entity subject to the applicability of this part, as set forth in § 111.1.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

138642

MEISNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138642 COA: 280190 Washtenaw CC: 06-000906-CZ STAMPER & COMPANY and JEFFREY J. PODOLSKI, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Official Journal C 182A/14 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 182A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5714 June 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 182A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5714 June 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2014/C 182A/01 | Notice of cancellation | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2014/C 182A/01

Notice of cancellation

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 182A/02 | Review of Competition C A Official Journals | 2 |

2014/C 182A/02

Review of Competition C A Official Journals

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

| 14.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 182/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 182/1

---

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION

2014/C 182 A/01

The open competitions:

| — | EPSO/AST/127/13 — Proofreaders (AST 3) with Greek as their main language (EL)

  and |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/127/13 — Proofreaders (AST 3) with Greek as their main language (EL)

and

| — | EPSO/AST/128/13 — Proofreaders (AST 3) with Portuguese as their main language (PT) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/128/13 — Proofreaders (AST 3) with Portuguese as their main language (PT)

for which the notices were published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (1) are cancelled.

---

(1)  OJ C 131 A, 8.5.2013, p. 1.

---

14.6.2014

| 14.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 182/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 182/2

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 182 A/02

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 11, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41157

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL VASQUEZ-MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:05-CR-2321-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Samuel VasquezMendoza raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 1212.606 Duplicate copies of records or portions of records. ( a ) NASA officials may maintain and use, for official purposes, duplicate copies of records or portions of records from a system of records maintained by their own organizational unit. This practice should occur only where there are justifiable organizational needs for it, e.g., where geographic distances make use of the system of records time consuming or inconvenient. These duplicate copies shall not be considered a separate NASA system of records. For example, an office head or designee may keep duplicate copies of personnel, training, or similar records on employees within the organization for administrative convenience purposes.
( b ) No disclosure shall be made from duplicate copies outside of the organizational unit. Any outside request for disclosure shall be referred to the appropriate system manager for response.
( c ) Duplicate copies are subject to the same safeguard requirements applicable to the system of records.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
HUGH HOWELL HESTER, JR. ) and JENNIFER F. PLOUFFE, as ) natural Guardians of and on behalf of ) C.H., a minor, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2294 ) ALL CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM ) INC., a Florida Corporation; ALL ) CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, INC., a ) Florida Corporation; PALM HARBOR ) INTERNAL MEDICINE AND ) PEDIATRICS, P.A., a Florida ) Professional Association; and ) KARENA AILEEN NERI, M.D., ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed August 24, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Jack R. St. Arnold, Judge. Shea T. Moxon, Celene H. Humphries, and Joseph T. Eagleton of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa; John F. Romano and Corey B. Friedman of Ramano Law Group, West Palm Beach, for Appellants. Marie A. Borland, C. Howard Hunter, and David Hughes of Hill, Ward, & Henderson, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees- 2 -

All Children's Health System, Inc. and All Children's Hospital, Inc. Dinah Stein and Sharon R. Vosseller of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., Miami, and Jeffrey M. Goodis of Goodis Thompson & Miller, P.A. St. Petersburg, for Appellees Palm Harbor Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, P.A. and Karena Aileen Neri, M.D.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 10.16


                                PRIVATE DOCUMENT


Pursuant to this private document assignment of account receivable is awarded by
Sodak Gaming International, Inc. company duly constituted pursuant to the laws
of the State of South Dakota, domiciled for these effects at Victor Andres
Belaunde 395, San Isidro, represented by Mr. Michael Jon Irwin, identified with
foreign registration number N-89743; hereinafter referred to as "Sodak", and the
other party, Fincorp Limited, a company incorporated pursuant to the laws of the
island Nevis, represented by Mr. Salvador Berty Falcon Goryn, with voter
registration number 06349261, domiciled in Alfredo Salazar N 590 San Isidro,
hereinafter referred to as "Fincorp", with the intervention of Sodak Gaming
Peru, S.A.C., with commercial number 26557526, domiciled in Av. Aviacion 2789,
San Borja, represented by its General Manager, Mr. Michael Jon Irwin, identified
with a foreign registration N-89743, hereinafter referred to as "Debtor",
pursuant to the following terms:

FIRST: Sodak possesses before the Debtor various accounts receivable in its
favor in the amount of $13,680,052 US Dollars, details of said accounts are
substantiated in documentation known by Fincorp.

SECOND: By way of the present document, Sodak assigns to Fincorp the entirety of
said accounts referred to above.

Its consideration for said assignment, Fincorp shall pay Sodak the sum of
$3,925,000 US Dollars. Sodak declares that as of the date it has received to its
satisfaction, $250,000 US Dollars.

Balance of the payment amounting to $3,675,000 US Dollars shall be made through
a bank transfer to:



         Bank Name & Address          US Bank
                                      701 St. Joseph Street
                                      Rapid City, SD 57701
         Beneficiary                  Sodak Gaming International, Inc.
                                      5301 S. Highway 16
                                      Rapid City, SD  57701


THIRD: Debtor appears in this act to grant its consent to the terms of the
present agreement.


                                                     Lima, December 15, 1998


                                      -71-
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Terry Gibson, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CoSine Communications, Inc.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.    /s/ Terry Gibson           Terry Gibson  Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer March 30, 2005
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10(b)  


  
 

  Consent of Independent Accountants    
  


We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-63328) of our report dated March 19, 2003, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the use in
this Registration Statement of our report dated March 17, 2003, on our audits of the financial statements of The Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which appears in such Registration
Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement. 


PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

Birmingham, Alabama

April 29, 2003 









QuickLinks


Consent of Independent Accountants