alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11

                         STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
                  SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (In thousands, except per share data)



<TABLE>


                                                               Three Months Ended          Nine Months Ended 
                                                               September  September       September  September
                                                               26, 1998    28, 1997       26, 1998    28, 1997

<S>                                                           <C>         <C>           <C>          <C>

Net income used in calculating basic and diluted
  earnings per common share............................         $3,706       $2,935       $10,556       $8,462
                                                              ========     ========      ========     ========
Basic earnings per common share:

Weighted average shares outstanding....................          7,144        7,692         7,005        8,728
                                                              ========     ========      ========     ========
Basic earnings per common share........................       $    .52     $    .38      $   1.51     $    .97
                                                              ========     ========      ========     ========
Diluted earnings per common share:

Weighted average shares outstanding....................          7,144        7,692         7,005        8,728
Add shares issuable assuming exercise of stock
    options ...........................................            919          938           998          860
    Weighted average shares outstanding
      used in calculating diluted
      earnings per common share........................          8,063        8,630         8,003        9,588
                                                              ========     ========      ========     ========
  Diluted earnings per common share....................       $    .46     $    .34      $   1.32     $    .88
                                                              ========     ========      ========     ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26

January 9, 2003

Joseph A. Fusco
[ADDRESS]

Re:  Employment Agreement dated April 17, 2000 between Joseph A. Fusco and Trump
     Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc., Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Holdings, L.P.
     and Trump Atlantic City Associates (collectively "Trump") (the "Agreement")

Dear Mr. Fusco:

This letter will confirm that the Agreement is hereby amended as set forth
below:

1.   the Expiration Date is extended to December 31, 2006;

2.   paragraph 2 is amended to reflect the annual base salary of $400,000; and

3.   paragraph 3 is amended to state that commencing January 1, 2004 the annual
     salary shall be increased at a rate not less than 5% per annum.

Except to the extent modified herein, you and Trump hereby ratify the Agreement
and agree that all other terms, conditions and obligations contained therein
remain in full force and effect as stated in the Agreement.

                                                Very truly yours,

                                                    /s/ MARK A. BROWN
                                                ---------------------------
                                                       MARK A. BROWN
                                                   Chief Operating Officer

Agreed and Consented to:

   /s/ JOSEPH A. FUSCO
---------------------------
      Joseph A. Fusco

1/9/03
Date
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ CYIOS CORPORATION, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2015

- 5152

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:15

- cv

- 00148

- PEC, Chief Judge Patricia E. Campbell

- Smith.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J OSHUA B. D UVALL , Matross Edwards, LLC, Washin gton, DC, argued for plaintiff

- appellant.

D ELISA S ANCHEZ , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washin gton, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by B ENJAMIN C. M IZER , R OBERT E. K IRSCHMAN , J R

. , D EBORAH A. B YNUM ; M ELLANY A LIO , Office of the Chief Counsel, U nited S tates Army Materiel Command Legal Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD; E VAN W ILLIAMS ,Cont ract and Fiscal Law Division, United S tates Army Lega l Services Agency, Fort Belvoir, VA.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK , C LEVENGER , and H UGHES , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 8, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this notice advises interested persons of the second meeting of the Network Reliability and Interoperability Council (Council) under its charter renewed as of January 6, 2000. The meeting will be held at the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, DC. 

# DATES:

Wednesday, August 23, 2000 at 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. SW., Room TW-C305, Washington, DC. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kent R. Nilsson at 202-418-0845 or TTY 202-418-2989. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Council was established by the Federal Communications Commission to bring together leaders of the telecommunications industry and telecommunications experts from academic, consumer and other organizations to explore and recommend measures that would enhance network reliability. The Council will receive reports on and discuss the progress of its three focus groups: Y2K, Network Reliability, and Interoperability. The Council may also discuss such other matters as come before it at the meeting. Members of the general public may attend the meeting. The Federal Communications Commission will attempt to accommodate as many people as possible. Admittance, however, will be limited to the seating available. The public may submit written comments before the meeting to Kent Nilsson, the Commission's Designated Federal Officer for the Network Reliability and Interoperability Council, by email (                    *KNILSSON@FCC.GOV*) or U.S. mail (7-B452, 445 12th St. SW., Washington, DC 20554). Real Audio and streaming video Access to the meeting will be available at http://www.fcc.gov/​.                 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10222 Filed 4-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 379 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit amounts paid 

for programs to obtain a recognized postsecondary credential or a license 

to be treated as qualified higher education expenses for purposes of 

a 529 account. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. MANCHIN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

amounts paid for programs to obtain a recognized postsecondary credential or a license to be treated as qualified higher education expenses for purposes of a 529 

account. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 379 IS

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAREER TRAINING EXPENSES TREAT2 ED AS QUALIFIED HIGHER EDUCATION EX3 PENSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 529(e) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by add6 ing at the end the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(C) CERTAIN CAREER TRAINING EX8 PENSES.— 

9 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an 

10 individual who is enrolled in or attending a 

11 program to obtain a recognized postsec12 ondary credential or occupational license, 

13 the term ‘qualified higher education ex14 penses’ includes expenses similar to the ex15 penses described in subparagraph (A) 

16 which are required for such program. 

17 ‘‘(ii) PROGRAM TO OBTAIN A RECOG18 NIZED POSTSECONDARY CREDENTIAL.— 

19 For purposes of this subparagraph— 

20 ‘‘(I) the term ‘recognized postsec21 ondary credential’ has the meaning 

22 given the term in section 3(52) of the 

23 Workforce Innovation and Oppor24 tunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102(52)), and 

25 ‘‘(II) when used with respect to 

26 obtaining such a credential, the term 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 379 IS

1 ‘program’ means only a program 

2 which is included, and is offered by a 

3 provider which is included, on the list 

4 described in section 122(d) of the 

5 Workforce Innovation and Oppor6 tunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3152(d)).’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to expenses paid or incurred in 

9 taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending April 30, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Gary Pokrassa, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:





(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





June
      14, 2010
            
            /s/Gary PokrassaGary
      Pokrassa,Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Cardinal Financial Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-157183 on Form S-3 and the registration statements
(Nos. 333-106694, 333-111672, 333-111673, 333-127395, 333-134923 and 333-134934) on Form S-8 of
Cardinal Financial Corporation of our report dated March 14, 2011, with respect to the consolidated statements of condition of Cardinal Financial Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and
2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on
Form 10-K of Cardinal Financial Corporation.

KPMG LLP

McLean,
Virginia
March 14, 2011

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officers of National Lampoon, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(a)           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2009 of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and




(b)           Information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  October
1, 2009








/s/ Timothy
Durham


Timothy
Durham, Chief Executive Officer and President




/s/Rick
Snow


Rick
Snow, Interim Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1253.540 Advertising.

A recipient shall not in any advertising related to employment indicate preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on sex unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the particular job in question.
Exhibit 31(a)


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO Rule 131-14(a)/15d-14(a)


               UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arnie Geller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RMS TITANIC, Inc., the
registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's Chief Financial Officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's Chief Financial Officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: October 13, 2004

/s/ Arnie Geller
-----------------
Arnie Geller,
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1214.1106 Selection of astronaut candidates.

The selection board will recommend to the JSC Director its selection of candidates from among those finalists who are medically qualified. The number and names of candidates selected to be added to the corps will be approved, as required, by JSC/ NASA management and the Associate Administrator for Space Flight, prior to notifying the individuals or the public.
* TheHonorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3181

___________ Mary Gray, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Larry Massanari, Acting * Commissioner, Social Security * [UNPUBLISHED] Administration, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 12, 2001 Filed: April 24, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and VIETOR, * District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. Mary Gray sought disability insurance benefits asserting she is disabled by fibromyalgia, stress, fatigue, depression, and memory loss. An administrative law judge(ALJ) concluded Gray is not disabled because she retains the residual functional capacity to return to her past relevant work as a salesperson. Gray sought judicial-2-

review, and the district court concluded substantial evidence supported the ALJ's dec ision. Gray appeals asserting the ALJ did not properly consider her subjective complaints, her treating physician's opinion that she can only stand or walk for four hours per day, and the limitations posed by her severe depression. Having carefully reviewedthe record, we conclude the district court correctly held substantial evidence supports the ALJ's decision. The ALJ evaluated Gray's subjective complaints in compliance with Polaski v. Heckler , 751 F.2d 943, 948 (8th Cir. 1984), and properly found Gray's subjective complaints were not credible because of inconsistencies in the evidence. The ALJ also properly found Gray could perform her past relevant work as it was actually performed, and Gray's depression was situational in nature and relieved by medication. We thus affirm the district court. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 1264.139 Stays ordered by the Department of Justice.

If at any time the Attorney General or an Assistant Attorney General designated by the Attorney General transmits to the authority head a written finding that continuation of the administrative process described in this part with respect to a claim or statement may adversely affect any pending or potential criminal or civil action related to such claim or statement, the authority head shall stay the process immediately. If the process is before the presiding officer, the authority head shall promptly transmit the finding to the presiding officer, who, in turn, must stay the proceeding and give notice to all parties and their representatives. The authority head may order the process resumed only upon receipt of the written authorization of the Attorney General.
#### § 1253.550 Sex as a bona fide occupational qualification.

A recipient may take action otherwise prohibited by §§ 1253.500 through 1253.550 provided it is shown that sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for that action, such that consideration of sex with regard to such action is essential to successful operation of the employment function concerned. A recipient shall not take action pursuant to this section that is based upon alleged comparative employment characteristics or stereotyped characterizations of one or the other sex, or upon preference based on sex of the recipient, employees, students, or other persons, but nothing contained in this section shall prevent a recipient from considering an employee's sex in relation to employment in a locker room or toilet facility used only by members of one sex.
§ 121.589 Carry-on baggage. ( a ) No certificate holder may allow the boarding of carry-on baggage on an airplane unless each passenger's baggage has been scanned to control the size and amount carried on board in accordance with an approved carry-on baggage program in its operations specifications. In addition, no passenger may board an airplane if his/her carry-on baggage exceeds the baggage allowance prescribed in the carry-on baggage program in the certificate holder's operations specifications.
( b ) No certificate holder may allow all passenger entry doors of an airplane to be closed in preparation for taxi or pushback unless at least one required crewmember has verified that each article of baggage is stowed in accordance with this section and § 121.285 (c) and (d).
( c ) No certificate holder may allow an airplane to take off or land unless each article of baggage is stowed: ( 1 ) In a suitable closet or baggage or cargo stowage compartment placarded for its maximum weight and providing proper restraint for all baggage or cargo stowed within, and in a manner that does not hinder the possible use of any emergency equipment; or
( 2 ) As provided in § 121.285 (c) and (d); or
( 3 ) Under a passenger seat.
( d ) Baggage, other than articles of loose clothing, may not be placed in an overhead rack unless that rack is equipped with approved restraining devices or doors.
( e ) Each passenger must comply with instructions given by crewmembers regarding compliance with paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), and (g) of this section.
( f ) Each passenger seat under which baggage is allowed to be stowed shall be fitted with a means to prevent articles of baggage stowed under it from sliding forward. In addition, each aisle seat shall be fitted with a means to prevent articles of baggage stowed under it from sliding sideward into the aisle under crash impacts severe enough to induce the ultimate inertia forces specified in the emergency landing condition regulations under which the airplane was type certificated.
( g ) In addition to the methods of stowage in paragraph (c) of this section, flexible travel canes carried by blind individuals may be stowed— ( 1 ) Under any series of connected passenger seats in the same row, if the cane does not protrude into an aisle and if the cane is flat on the floor; or
( 2 ) Between a nonemergency exit window seat and the fuselage, if the cane is flat on the floor; or
( 3 ) Beneath any two nonemergency exit window seats, if the cane is flat on the floor; or
( 4 ) In accordance with any other method approved by the Administrator.
[Doc. No. 24996, 52 FR 21476, June 5, 1987, as amended by Amdt. 121-251, 60 FR 65935, Dec. 20, 1995]