alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2071-000]

Take notice that on April 18, 2000, Lakefield Junction, L.P. filed a letter with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission withdrawing its Petition for Order Accepting Market-Based Rate Schedule for Filing and Granting Waivers and Blanket Approvals submitted for filing in this docket on March 31, 2000.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before May 9, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10864  Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 12, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

In the

United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

_______________

m 01-10891

_______________

RUBY R. CALAD,

Plaintiff-AppellantCross-Appellee,

WALTER PATRICK THORN,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee,

VERSUS

CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED,

DOING BUSINESS AS HEALTHSOURCE,

DOING BUSINESS AS CIGNA CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE;

AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE OF NORTH TEXAS, INC.,

Defendants-AppelleesCross-Appellants.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
_______________

m 01-10905

_______________

JUAN DAVILA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE, INC.;

AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE OF NORTH TEXAS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

Dist. Ct. m 3:00-CV-2368-D (5th Cir. Nos. 01-10891, 01-10905)

Dist. Ct. m 3:00-CV-2693-H (5th Cir. m 01-10891)

_________________________

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before SMITH and BENAVIDES, 

Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

TheSupremeCourt reversed and remanded

this panel’s opinion. See Roark v. Humana,

Inc., 307 F.3d 298 (5th Cir. 2002), reversed

sub nom. Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila, ___

U.S. ___, 124 S. Ct. 2488 (2004). We requested and have received letters from the

parties advising of their respective positions

regarding the appropriate action to be taken by

this court on remand. The parties appear to

agree that this litigation is at an end. Plaintiffs

Calad and Davila have nonsuited their actions

in state court.

Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED.

All costs are taxed against the plaintiffs.

*

 Judge Parker was a member of this panel but

resigned from the court after the initial opinion was

issued. This matter is now decided by a quorum.

See 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

          - 14 CFR Part 71 
          - [Airspace Docket No. 00-ACE-3]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of a direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Cuba, MO. 

# DATES:

The direct final rule published at 65 FR 9998 is effective on 0901 UTC, June 15, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2524. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 25, 2000 (65 FR 9998). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that on adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent of submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on June 15, 2000. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                 

      ( print page 25440)    
Issued in Kansas City, MO on April 14, 2000. 

Richard L. Day, 

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region. 

[FR Doc. 00-10850  Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

          - [FE Docket No. 96-07-NG] 

# AGENCY:

Office of Fossil Energy, DOE. 

# ACTION:

Notice of order. 

# SUMMARY:

The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives notice that it has issued an order to BC Gas Utility Ltd. amending the natural gas import and export authorization granted by DOE/FE Order No.1149 (1 FE ¶ 71,240). Order 1149-A extends the term from May 1, 2000, through April 30, 2002, and increases the annual limit from 5 billion cubic feet (Bcf) to 6 Bcf. Under the import/export arrangement, Canadian natural gas will be imported through the existing pipeline facilities at Sumas, Washington, and Eastport, Idaho, for storage at the Jackson Prairie Storage Field in Washington State, and then exported back to Canada. 

This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of Natural Gas & Petroleum Import & Export Activities docket room, 3E-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC, 20585, (202) 586-9478. The docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 21, 2000. 

John W. Glynn, 

Manager, Natural Gas Regulation, Office of Natural Gas & Petroleum Import and Export Activities, Office of Fossil Energy. 

[FR Doc. 00-10894 Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION F OR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Case number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 438

- CV

Style: Don Johnson & Freddie Oliver, Appellants v. Texas Serenity Academy, Inc,

Appellee

Date motion filed : June 29 , 201 5

Part y filing motion: Appell ant s

T he Court

, having unanimously voted against rehearing en banc,

order s that the motion for rehearing en banc , as amended, is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting for the Court

Before: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland,

Massengale

, Brown , Huddle , and Lloyd

.

Date: July 28 , 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            1,271,570
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                   0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                     0
<EQUITIES>                                         67,215
<MORTGAGE>                                              0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                       8,304
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  1,457,512
<CASH>                                             25,603
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                494,547
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                            115,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2,625,103
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 1,085,837
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                               558,258
<POLICY-OTHER>                                          0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                   0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   127,300
<COMMON>                                              376
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        370,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2,625,103
<PREMIUMS>                                        278,177
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                38,694
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  3,722
<OTHER-INCOME>                                          0
<BENEFITS>                                        161,296
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        61,796
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               41,332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    47,405
<INCOME-TAX>                                       14,629
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                32,776
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       32,776
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.83
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                    632,850
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                               167,079
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                       0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                 26,318
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                  131,105
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                   828,522
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                            13,984



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**
**Respondent**

**v.**

**BENJAMIN BRABHAM,**

**Petitioner :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 679 EAL 2015**

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the**  Unpublished Memorandum and Order **of the Superior Court at No. 244 EDA 2015 exited November 20, 2015,**  affirming **the Order of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas at No.**  **CP-51-CR-1206831-1993 exited December 17, 2014** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 25 th**  **day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance o f Appeal**  **is GRANTED on a limited basis, solely pertaining to the issues of whether Petitioner’s**  **sentence violates the prohibition against mandatory lif e sentences for juvenile offenders**  **announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S.**  **___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012). As a result of the recen t holding by that Court that Miller**  **must be applied retroactively by the States, see Montgom ery v. Louisiana, 2016 WL**  **280758 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2016), the Superior Court’s or der is VACATED, and the case is**  **REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Montgom ery. Allocatur is DENIED** 
**in all other respects.**
**To the extent necessary, leave is to be granted to ame nd the post-conviction**  **petition to assert the jurisdictional provision of the Post Conviction Relief Act extending**  **to the recognition of constitutional rights by the Sup reme Court of the United States**  **which it deems to be retroactive. See 42 Pa.C.S. §9545 (b)(1)(iii).** **[679 EAL 2015] - 2**

**Justice Eakin and Justice Donohue did not participate in th e consideration or** 

**decision of this matter.**
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ANTHONY T. FULLER, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10352 

D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00023-SOM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Susan O. Mollway, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 10, 2018**

Before: CANBY, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Anthony T. Fuller appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges 

the 26-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Fuller first contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 11 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-10352 

explain the sentence adequately. We review for plain error, see United States v. 

Miqbel, 444 F. 3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), and conclude that there is none. The 

court thoroughly explained its reasons for the sentence on two occasions. Contrary 

to Fuller’s suggestion, the court was not required to mention each of the 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3583(e) factors to show that it had considered them. See United States v. Carty, 

520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

Fuller next contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. He 

argues that the 26-month sentence is longer than necessary and that the district 

court imposed the sentence solely to promote respect for the law, an impermissible 

sentencing factor in a supervised release proceeding. The district court did not 

abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The record 

shows that the court did not base the sentence on improper considerations, but 

rather properly considered Fuller’s poor attitude on supervision, as well as the 

frequency of his supervised release revocations and the length of his prior 

sentences. See United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 2007) 

(the violator’s history and the extent of his breach of the court’s trust are 

appropriate considerations at a revocation sentencing). The above-Guidelines 

sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the section 3583(e) sentencing 

factors and the totality of the circumstances. Fuller’s constitutional claims 

concerning the length of his sentence also fail. See United States v. Williams, 636 
3 17-10352 

F.3d 1229, 1232 (9th Cir. 2011) (sentence is unconstitutional if it is “grossly 

disproportionate” to the crime).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Ralph C. Guild, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) (Intentionally omitted)

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:

a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ RALPH C. GUILD                               
|                        |  |  |  | Ralph C. Guild                                   
|                        |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
STATEMENTS  FOR THE TWELVE  MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND AS OF MARCH 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.




</LEGEND>
<CIK>         0000904144
<NAME> EMERGING BETA CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                   1
<CURRENCY>                     US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         290,457
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               290,457
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 299,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,502
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       43,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     250,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   299,893
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16,276
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,194
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,194
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .05
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
R. Scheffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1).     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2).     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  October 14, 2003                     By: /s/ Jeffrey R. Scheffer
                                            ---------------------------
                                                    Jeffrey R. Scheffer
                                                    Chief Executive Officer