alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY

Appendix C

Aerial Photos Are Scheduled in your Neighborhood

DATE: _________________________

TIME: _________________________

LOCATION: ________________________

______________________________________

Why Tell Me?

Merely as a curtesy to let you know a drone will be airborne taking pictures of the above 

mentioned property. Most neighbors want to know what that flying thing is and what is it doing.

What Are You Photographing?

We will be photographing the subject property with a conscience effort to limit our focus on the 

subject boundary lines except when neighborhood or subdivision imaging may also be part of the 

requested photo shoot.

Should I be concerned about Privacy or Safety?

Absolutely not! Aerial Imaging Services (AIS) is committed both safety and privacy. Our 

objectives are very specific while in flight photography is underway. Achieving the client objective

is our only interest and will always focus on the subject property.

We notify the surrounding and adjoining property owners in advance and state the purpose and 

time line of the shoot. Every pre-flight safety precaution is taken to insure our quad copter is in 

flight condition and never fly at heights or in proximity to obstructions and power lines that could 

result in collision. Our quad copter is never flown out of “Line of Sight” and strict weather 

criteria is always adhered to.

How do I contact you with questions or concerns?

I can be reached by text, e-mail and phone.

Ronald W. Duff

Aerial Imaging Services

(217) 652-6025

RonDuff@Ameritech.net
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 1, 2021 No. 04-20-00502-CR Kevin Arick Brice O'DELL , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-20-010 Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice On February 4, 2021, appellant filed a pro se “Motion to Dismiss Attorney Deborah Perry’s Response to Appellate Court about Jurisdiction/Out of Time Appeal” and “Motion to Withdrawl [sic] Guilty Plea/Plea Bargain due to Involuntariness.” On January 27, 2021, we issued a memorandum opinion and order in this appeal dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. After consideration, we DENY the motions.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 1st day of March, 2021.___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

SPECIALTY HEALTH ASSOCIATES, LLC a/a/o ISABELLA VECCHIO , Appellant,

v.

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 73

[ April 1, 2021 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Jennifer Waters , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 19

- 370

- SC and 19

- AP

- 15

.
Michelle J. Kane of Kane Lawyers, PLLC, Delray Beach, and Chad A. Barr of Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for

ap pellant.

Rebecca L. Delaney and Scott W. Dutton of Dutton Law Group, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C IKLIN , G ERBER AND F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2013171EN.01003701.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/37

---

Appeal brought on 14 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 February 2013 in Case F-113/11, Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-229/13 P)

2013/C 171/70

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Annul the order under appeal in its entirety and without exception; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the order under appeal in its entirety and without exception;

| — | Refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-203/13 P Marcuccio v Commission.

Marcuccio

Commission

---
# C_2022441EN.01000201.xml

| 21.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/2

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — ‘ĒDIENS & KM.LV’ PS v Ieslodzījuma vietu pārvalde, Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs

(Case C-592/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Public procurement - Directive 2014/24/EU - Conduct of the procedure - Choice of participants - Selection criteria - Technical and professional capacities - Article 58(4) - Forms of evidence - European Single Procurement Document - Article 59 - Reliance on the capacities of other entities - Article 63(1) - Group of economic operators - Condition relating to professional experience to be satisfied by the member of the group responsible, in the event of the award of the contract, for performing the activities requiring that experience - Condition not provided for in the procurement documents - Status of general partnership unaffected by the system of joint and several liability)

(2022/C 441/02)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Administratīvā rajona tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘ĒDIENS & KM.LV’ PS

Defendant: Ieslodzījuma vietu pārvalde, Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs

Operative part of the order

Article 63(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, read in conjunction with Article 59 thereof

must be interpreted as meaning that where it is established that, in the event of the award of a public service contract to a group of economic operators, the performance of the activities for which experience is required will be entrusted to a single member of the group, the tendering group may rely, in order to demonstrate that it satisfies a condition relating to experience imposed by the contracting authority in accordance with Article 58(4) of that directive, solely on the experience of that member of the group, even if the procurement documents do not expressly provide that the members of a group of economic operators must individually satisfy that condition.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 22.9.2021.

---
### Wniiams , Rene e (OST ) l^ck<Jl rhCrT - T^T - /9^^'4S'74 - Subject : FW : Essentia l Ai rServic e int o CZ N (Chisana )

Origina l Messag e From : Michell e Morri s [mailto:allyn.morris@comcast.net ] Sent : Friday , Apri l 02 , 201 9 11:4 7 AM To : Little , Cynthi a M (DOT ) Subject : Essentia l Ai r Servic e int o CZ N(Chisana ) Dea r Mrs . Little , A s an owne r o f fiv e acre s o f propert ynea r th e CZ Nairstrip , I woul d lik e t o hel p yo u understand ho wimportan t i t i s fo r m e t o hav e schedule d ai r servic e int o Chisana . Becaus e ther e i s n o road acces s an d I amno t a pilot , thi s mod e o f transportatio n i s th e onl ywayI can send supplie s bac k and fort hfro m"outside" . I t i s importan t fo r m e t o hav e thi s ai r servic e i f on e o f u s need s t o acces s medica l attention , particularl yi f m yhusband , wh o i s a pilo t i s ou t huntin g o ravia yfro mth e propert yand ca n not b e contacted . I t i s als o require d fo r friend s and famil yt o acces s ou r property . W e hav e a ver ysmal l plan e ourselve s and ofte n hav e t o send equipment , supplie s o r friend s and famil yb ymai l plane . Than k yo u fo r continuin g t o suppor t ou r need s i n thi s wonderfu l Alaska n Community . Sincerely , Michell e Morri s
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,124
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     42,311
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          34,425
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            33,579
<LOANS>                                        143,765
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 243,150
<DEPOSITS>                                     201,738
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,900
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                482
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,847
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 243,150
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,698
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,802
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   568
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,068
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,580
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,200
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,868
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      240
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,955
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,955
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,018
<EPS-BASIC>                                       4.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.00
<LOANS-NON>                                        287
<LOANS-PAST>                                       312
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,851
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      283
<RECOVERIES>                                        80
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,888
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,888
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
230630 ORD RE ADMIN EXPENSE MOT EXT VERSION JUNE 30, 2023 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER GRANTING URGENT CONSENSUAL 

MOTION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF RESPONSE DEADLINES

By the Urgent Consensual Motion for Further Extension of Response Deadlines

(Docket Entry No. 24693)2 (the “Extension Motion”),

3 the Oversight Board requests the 

extension of briefing deadlines with respect to the following motions (the “Motions,” and the 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and 

(vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 3801) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK5523-LTS). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to 

software limitations).

2 All docket entry references are to entries in Case No. 17-3283, unless otherwise 

specified.

3 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to them 

in the Extension Motion.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24701 Filed:06/30/23 Entered:06/30/23 17:05:29 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24701 Filed:06/30/23 Entered:06/30/23 17:05:29 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
230630 ORD RE ADMIN EXPENSE MOT EXT VERSION JUNE 30, 2023 3

5. This Order resolves Docket Entry No. 24693 in Case No. 17-3283.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 30, 2023

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24701 Filed:06/30/23 Entered:06/30/23 17:05:29 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 20- 0022

ORDER FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR APPELLANT TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the Appellant to file his opening brief is extended to **May 20,**  **2020** . ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW

cc: Montana Attorney General Tim Fox, Attorney for Appellee Lowy Lawy, Attorney for Appellant ERIC VALLEJO,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION,

Respondent and Appellee.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 21 2020

04/21/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0022
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




I, William S. Hummers III, the Executive Vice President and Principal Financial
Officer of The South Financial Group, Inc. ("TSFG") certify that to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2005 of TSFG (the "Report"):


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         TSFG.


/s/William S. Hummers III
---------------------------------
William S. Hummers III
Executive Vice President and Principal Financial Officer
The South Financial Group, Inc.
May 10, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to The South Financial Group, Inc.
and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



EXHIBIT 4.(l)  




  


PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY / P. O. BOX 2606 / BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35202  


  
 

    RESIDUAL DEATH BENEFIT ENDORSEMENT    
  


        The Company has issued this endorsement as a part of the policy to which it is attached ("the Policy"). 



        Notwithstanding
any provision in the Policy to the contrary, in the event this endorsement is in force and as of the date all of the following conditions are met ("RDB Effective Date"): 



	(1)
	The
Policy has been in force at least twenty (20) Policy Years;



	(2)
	The
Insured's Attained Age is at least sixty-five (65);



	(3)
	The
Policy Debt is at least ninety-nine (99) percent of the Cash Value; and



	(4)
	The
Policy Debt is greater than the Face Amount, 




any
riders attached to the Policy shall terminate, any Variable Account Value shall be transferred to the Fixed Account and the Level Death Benefit or Increasing Death Benefit defined under the Policy
shall be deemed to mean the following: 


        Level
Death Benefit—The Death Benefit shall be the greater of: 



	(a)
	The
Face Amount of insurance on the Insured's date of death;



	(b)
	a
specified percentage of the greater of the Policy Debt or Policy Value on the date of the Insured's death as indicated on the Table of Percentages shown in the Death Benefit
provision; or



	(c)
	The
Policy Debt on the Insured's date of death plus ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 




        Increasing
Death Benefit—The Death Benefit shall be the greater of: 



	(a)
	the
Face Amount of insurance on the Insured's date of death plus the Policy Value on such date;



	(b)
	a
specified percentage of the greater of the Policy Debt or Policy Value on the Insured's date of death as indicated on the Table of Percentages shown in the Death Benefit provision;
or



	(c)
	The
Policy Debt on the Insured's date of death plus ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 




        As
of the RDB Effective Date, the Company shall no longer allow any: 



	(a)
	Premium
payments;



	(b)
	Withdrawals;



	(c)
	Policy
Loans;



	(d)
	Face
Amount changes; or



	(e)
	Death
Benefit Option changes. 




        In
addition, as of the RDB Effective Date, the Policy will not Lapse as of any Monthly Anniversary Day if and only if conditions (1) through (4) described above are met as
of such Day. 


        Termination of Endorsement.    This endorsement shall terminate if the Policy terminates. Signed for the Company as of the
Policy Effective Date. 



	 	 	PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
	

 	
 	

/s/  DEBORAH J. LONG      
 Secretary




1









QuickLinks


RESIDUAL DEATH BENEFIT ENDORSEMENT
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 366 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 366

To authorize former Federal employees who receive voluntary separation 
   incentive payments under the Department of Agriculture program to 
accept subsequent employment with the Federal Government, without loss 
of their payments, when such employment is directly related to fighting 
                             forest fires.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2003

Ms. Hooley of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee 
   on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize former Federal employees who receive voluntary separation 
   incentive payments under the Department of Agriculture program to 
accept subsequent employment with the Federal Government, without loss 
of their payments, when such employment is directly related to fighting 
                             forest fires.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REEMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR RECIPIENTS OF VOLUNTARY 
              SEPARATION INCENTIVE PAYMENTS UNDER DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE PROGRAM.

     Section 735(e) of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and 
Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997 
(Public Law 104-180; 110 Stat. 1604; 5 U.S.C. 5597 note), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``An individual'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) Forfeiture of incentive payment.--An individual''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Exception.--The forfeiture requirement in paragraph 
        (1) shall not apply if the subsequent employment or personal 
        services contract is directly related to fighting forest 
        fires.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ending October 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Gary Pokrassa, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/Gary Pokrassa
----------------
Gary Pokrassa,
Chief Financial Officer

December 15, 2004


                                                                              21
Debtor’s Ex. 61

Debtor’s Ex. 61

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21772-9 Filed:08/07/22 Entered:08/07/22 16:09:24 Desc:

Debtors Ex. 61 Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21772-9 Filed:08/07/22 Entered:08/07/22 16:09:24 Desc:

Debtors Ex. 61 Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21772-9 Filed:08/07/22 Entered:08/07/22 16:09:24 Desc:

Debtors Ex. 61 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2316

CAROL H. ABERCROMBIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT M. WALKER, Secretary, Department of the Army, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 3082-MJG) Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carol H. Abercrombie, Appellant Pro Se. Roann Nichols, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Carol H. Abercrombie appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendant on Abercrombie's reprisal discrimination claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Abercrombie v. Walker , CA-98-3082-MJG (D. Md. Aug. 30, 1999). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED