alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 13.45 Computation of time and extension of time. ( a ) In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by this subpart, the date of the act, event, default, notice, or order is not to be included in the computation. The last day of the period so computed is to be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal holiday.
( b ) Whenever a party must respond within a prescribed period after service by mail, 5 days are added to the prescribed period.
( c ) The parties may agree to extend the time for filing any document required by this subpart with the consent of— ( 1 ) The Director of the Office of Adjudication prior to the designation of a hearing officer;
( 2 ) The hearing officer prior to the filing of a notice of appeal; or
( 3 ) The Director of the Office of Adjudication after the filing of a notice of appeal.
( d ) If the parties do not agree, a party may make a written request to extend the time for filing to the appropriate official identified in paragraph (c) of this section. The appropriate official may grant the request for good cause shown.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 70427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29201]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2011-OS-0107]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records; Correction

AGENCY: National Security Agency/Central Security Service, DOD.

ACTION: Notice to amend a system of records; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 5, 2011 (76 FR 61676-61679), DoD published a notice 
announcing its intent to amend a Privacy Act System of Records. 
Categories of Individuals Covered by the System was written 
incorrectly; and Categories of Records in the System were omitted. This 
notice corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: National Security Agency/Central 
Security Service, Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Office, 
9800 Savage Road, Suite 6248, Ft. George G. Meade, MD 20755-6248 or 
call by phone at (301) 688-6527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 5, 2011, DoD published a notice 
announcing its intent to amend a system in its inventory of Privacy Act 
System of Records: NSA/CSS Employee Assistance Service Case Records. 
Subsequent to the publication of that notice, DoD discovered that the 
Categories of Individuals Covered by the System on page 61677 was 
incorrectly published, and the Categories of Records in the System were 
omitted.

Correction

    In the notice (FR Doc. 2011-OS-0107) published on October 5, 2011, 
(76 FR 61676-61679) make the following correction. On page 61677, in 
the third column, replace the Categories of Individuals Covered by the 
System paragraph with ``NSA/CSS civilian employees, military assignees, 
and family members who voluntarily request counseling assistance. Non-
NSA federal employees and third-party employees (foreign nationals) who 
are detailed to NSA/CSS.''
    After this paragraph insert: ``CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
    Files consist of the individual's full name, Social Security Number 
(SSN), address and case records compiled by counselor and patient 
questionnaires, questionnaires completed by private counselors to whom 
clients are referred, the records of medical treatment and services, 
correspondence with personal physicians and other care providers, NSA/
CSS Medical Center reports, results of psychological assessment testing 
and interviews, psychiatric examination results and related reports.''

    Dated: November 7, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-29201 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
§ 141.91 Satellite bases. The holder of a pilot school certificate or provisional pilot school certificate may conduct ground training or flight training in an approved course of training at a base other than its main operations base if: ( a ) An assistant chief instructor is designated for each satellite base, and that assistant chief instructor is available at that base or, if away from the premises, by telephone, radio, or other electronic means during the time that training is provided for an approved training course;
( b ) The airport, facilities, and personnel used at the satellite base meet the appropriate requirements of subpart B of this part and its approved training course outline;
( c ) The instructors are under the direct supervision of the chief instructor or assistant chief instructor for the appropriate training course, who is readily available for consultation in accordance with § 141.85(b) of this part; and
( d ) The responsible Flight Standards office for the area in which the school is located is notified in writing if training is conducted at a base other than the school's main operations base for more than 7 consecutive days.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16347, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 141-9, 62 FR 40908, July 30, 1997, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 141-19, 83 FR 9175, Mar. 5, 2018]
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Ron Howell certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2011;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: August 15, 2011  \s\ Ron Howell Ron Howell Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3205]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Music in the Age of Confucius''

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459 ), the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority of 
October 19, 1999, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in 
the exhibition ``Music in the Age of Confucius,'' imported from abroad 
for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to 
loan agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Smithsonian's, 
Freer Gallery of Art and Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, from on or about 
April 30 to September 17, 2000, is in the national interest. Public 
Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Carol Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
619-6981). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44; 301-4th 
Street, S.W., Room 700, Washington, D.C. 20547-0001.

    Dated: January 9, 2000.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-1077 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
Exhibit 21.1

The following is a list of Avalons subsidiaries except for unnamed subsidiaries which considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.



|                                               |  |                       
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Subsidiary Name                                |  | State of Incorporation
|     American Landfill Management, Inc.       |  | Ohio                  
|                                               | 
|     American Waste Management Services, Inc. |  | Ohio                  
|                                               | 
|     Avalon Golf and Country Club, Inc.       |  | Ohio                  
|                                               | 
|     Avalon Lakes Golf, Inc.                  |  | Ohio                  
|                                               | 
|     Avalon Travel, Inc.                      |  | Ohio                  
|                                               | 
|     TBG, Inc.                                |  | Ohio                  
|                                               | 
|     Avalon Country Club at Sharon, Inc.      |  | Pennsylvania          

Parent/subsidiary relationships are indicated by indentations. In each case, 100% of the voting securities of each
of the subsidiaries is owned by the indicated parent of such subsidiary.



19
§ 1264.119 Disclosure of documents. ( a ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant may review any relevant and material documents, transcripts, records, and other materials that relate to the allegations set out in the complaint and upon which the findings and conclusions of the investigating official under § 1264.103(b) are based unless such documents are subject to a privilege under Federal law. Upon payment of a reasonable fee for duplication, the defendant may obtain copies of such documents.
( b ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant also may obtain a copy of all exculpatory information in the possession of the reviewing official or investigating official relating to the allegations in the complaint, even if it is contained in a document that would otherwise be privileged. If the document would otherwise be privileged, only that portion containing exculpatory information must be disclosed.
( c ) The notice sent to the Attorney General from the reviewing official as described in § 1264.104 is not discoverable under any circumstances.
( d ) The defendant may file a motion to compel disclosure of the documents subject to the provisions of this section. Such a motion may only be filed with the presiding officer following the filing of an answer pursuant to § 1264.108.
The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 95-4244

___________

Billy Orr, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Kirkwood School District, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: January 23, 1997

 Filed: February 18, 1997

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Billy Orr, an African American, appeals the district court's1

grant of summary judgment to Kirkwood School District in his

employment discrimination suit. After de novo review, we affirm

the district court's decision with regard to Orr's federal claims.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B. As to Orr's state-law claims, we modify the

district court's order to reflect that they are dismissed without
prejudice. See Labickas v. Arkansas State Univ., 78 F.3d 333, 334-

35 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 395 (1996). 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 

MEMORANDUM 

OFFICE OF 

CHEMICAL SAFETY ANO 

POLLUTION PREVENTION 

PC Code: 124871 

DP Barcode: 427618 

SUBJECT: Review of Public Response to Spirodiclofen Problem Formulation in the 

Registration Review Preliminary Work Plan 

FROM: ~~y Liu, PhD, Chemist -r;,v.-L t--

in Housenger, Biologist Cllt)w 1 V ~ 

Environmental Risk Branch 5 

THRU: 

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) - D 7/ I ojl 5 

) 

Mah Shamim, PhD, Branch Chief --

('VVVv~ 

Environmental Risk Branch 5 

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) 

TO: Jolene Trujillo, Chemical Review Manager 

Jill Bloom, Team Leader 

Risk Management and Implementation Branch 5 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P) 

EFED Spirodiclofen team has reviewed comments received from Bayer CropScience on the 

Registration Review Preliminary Work Plan for Spirodiclofen. The team has responded below to 

the individual comments that are related to the problem formulation for the ecological risk 

assessment and drinking water exposure assessment in the Preliminary Work Plan. 

Bayer Comment 1: Bayer indicated that there is one SLN registration (NY- 140006) that was 

not included in the Preliminary Work Plan 

EFED Response: EFED will include this SLN (NY-140006) in the registration review. 

However, since this SLN only includes a restricted use statement on pome fruit in NY, it will not 

affect the ecological and fate risk assessment. 

Bayer Comment 2: Instead of using the total residues of parent and the degradation products 

(BAJ 2740-enol, BAJ 2740-ketohydroxy, and BAJ 2740-dihydroxy) and the Koc of the least 

sorbing degradation product (BAJ 2740-enol) to calculate EECs in the drinking water exposure 

assessment, Bayer thinks that the exposure can be refined by using individual concentrations of 

the parent or metabolites and the corresponding Koc. 
EFED Response: EFED has been developing the guidance for calculating the formation/decline 

constants for modeling toxic residues of pesticides in the environment. Once this guidance is 

finalized, EFED should be able to better estimate and refine the potential exposure in the 

drinking water assessment. 

Bayer Comment 3: Bayer indicated that the following study will be submitted to the Agency. 

Schur, A. 2002. Assessment of side effects of BAJ 2740 SC 240 on the honey bee (Apis 

mellifera L.) in the semi-field. Bayer unpublished report M-033472-01-1. 11 2 pages. 

EFED Response: EFED acknowledges it. This study could be used to fulfill part of the 

ecological data gaps stated in the problem formulation.
F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 27 2003

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

OMAR COMBS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 02-2230

(D.C. No. CR-98-98 LH)

(D. New Mexico)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

Before EBEL , HENRY , and HARTZ , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore

submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral

estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments;

nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions

of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Pro se defendant Omar Combs appeals from the district court’s denial of

his post-judgment motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e), requesting grand jury
-2-

transcripts at government expense. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

We affirm. 

Defendant was convicted of conspiracy to distribute marijuana, and

possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He was sentenced to 120 months

in prison, to be followed by eight years of supervised release. We affirmed the

convictions and sentence on direct appeal. See United States v. Combs, 267 F.3d

1167 (10th Cir. 2001). 

On May 17 and July 10, 2002, defendant filed post-judgment motions for

grand jury transcripts under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). He claims that the transcripts

are needed to assist him in a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 that he plans to file,

but he provides no particularized reason why the transcripts would be necessary

for that proceeding. We have held that “[p]arties seeking grand jury transcripts

under Rule 6(e) must show that the material they seek is needed to avoid a

possible injustice in another judicial proceeding, that the need for disclosure is

greater than the need for continued secrecy, and that their request is structured to

cover only material so needed.” In re Lynde, 922 F.2d 1448,1451-52 (10th Cir.

1991) (internal quotation marks omitted). Since defendant fails to make these

required showings, his motion must fail. 

We agree with the district court that defendant’s motion for grand jury

transcripts should be denied. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, and for
-3-

substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court’s August 21, 2002,

order, we AFFIRM the order of the district court. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Harris L Hartz

Circuit Judge
Schedule of Executory Contracts to be Assumed

The Debtor reserves the right to amend, on or prior to the Effective Date, this schedule to delete any Executory Contract therefrom or 

add any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease, in which event such Executory Contract(s) or Unexpired Lease(s) shall be deemed to 

be, as the case may be, either assumed, or assumed and assigned as of the Effective Date.

Executory Contract Counterparty(ies) Cure 

Amount

Fuel Supply Contract dated as of July 31, 2015 [ECF No. 154] Freepoint Commodities, LLC $0.00

Unexpired Lease of Nonresidential Real Property, Contract No: 

2014-P00058 [ECF No. 553]

Carolina Shopping Court, Inc. $169,230.84

Unexpired Lease of Nonresidential Real Property, Contract No: 

2017-P00081 [ECF No. 553]

Municipality of Dorado Contract $11,504.00

Power Purchase and Operating Agreement (as amended) [ECF No. 

2038]

Ecoeléctrica, L.P. $0.00

Gas Sale and Purchase Agreement (as amended) [ECF No. 2038] Gas Natural Aprovisionamientos SDG, S.A. $0.00

Renewable Power Purchase and Operating Agreement, dated June 3, 

2010 (as amended). [ECF No. 2317]

AES Ilumina, LLC $0.00

Renewable Power Purchase and Operating Agreement, dated 

October 24, 2011 (as amended). [ECF No. 2317]

Humacao Solar Project, LLC $0.00

Renewable Power Purchase and Operating Agreement, dated June 

11, 2010 (as amended). [ECF No. 2317]

Pattern Santa Isabel LLC $0.00

Renewable Power Purchase and Operating Agreement dated 

November 16, 2010 (as amended). [ECF No. 2317]

San Fermín Solar Farm, LLC $0.00

Renewable Power Purchase and Operating Agreement, dated Horizon Energy, LLC $0.00

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24387-4 Filed:05/31/23 Entered:05/31/23 22:24:52 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 1 of 2
2

October 15, 2010 (as amended). [ECF No. 2317]

Renewable Power Purchase and Operating Agreement, dated 

November 16, 2010 (as amended). [ECF No. 2317]

Oriana Energy, LLC $0.00

Renewable Power Purchase Operating Agreement [ECF No. 2667] Ciro One Salinas, LLC $0.00

Renewable Power Purchase Operating Agreement [ECF No. 2667] Xzerta Tec Solar I, LLC $0.00

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24387-4 Filed:05/31/23 Entered:05/31/23 22:24:52 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS  SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-QSB  AT DECEMBER  31, 1997  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                     396,968
<SECURITIES>                                76,923
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           679,142
<PP&E>                                     101,657
<DEPRECIATION>                             101,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,926,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      379,157
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    64,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                               2,382,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,926,071
<SALES>                                    315,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           315,668
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              436,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (307,216)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            175,265
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,009
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        172,256
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               172,256
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .03
        

</TABLE>