alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 135.381 Large transport category airplanes: Turbine engine powered: En route limitations: One engine inoperative. ( a ) No person operating a turbine engine powered large transport category airplane may take off that airplane at a weight, allowing for normal consumption of fuel and oil, that is greater than that which (under the approved, one engine inoperative, en route net flight path data in the Airplane Flight Manual for that airplane) will allow compliance with paragraph (a) (1) or (2) of this section, based on the ambient temperatures expected en route. ( 1 ) There is a positive slope at an altitude of at least 1,000 feet above all terrain and obstructions within five statute miles on each side of the intended track, and, in addition, if that airplane was certificated after August 29, 1958 (SR422B), there is a positive slope at 1,500 feet above the airport where the airplane is assumed to land after an engine fails.
( 2 ) The net flight path allows the airplane to continue flight from the cruising altitude to an airport where a landing can be made under § 135.387 clearing all terrain and obstructions within five statute miles of the intended track by at least 2,000 feet vertically and with a positive slope at 1,000 feet above the airport where the airplane lands after an engine fails, or, if that airplane was certificated after September 30, 1958 (SR422A, 422B), with a positive slope at 1,500 feet above the airport where the airplane lands after an engine fails.
( b ) For the purpose of paragraph (a)(2) of this section, it is assumed that— ( 1 ) The engine fails at the most critical point en route;
( 2 ) The airplane passes over the critical obstruction, after engine failure at a point that is no closer to the obstruction than the approved navigation fix, unless the Administrator authorizes a different procedure based on adequate operational safeguards;
( 3 ) An approved method is used to allow for adverse winds;
( 4 ) Fuel jettisoning will be allowed if the certificate holder shows that the crew is properly instructed, that the training program is adequate, and that all other precautions are taken to ensure a safe procedure;
( 5 ) The alternate airport is selected and meets the prescribed weather minimums; and
( 6 ) The consumption of fuel and oil after engine failure is the same as the consumption that is allowed for in the approved net flight path data in the Airplane Flight Manual.
[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-110, 72 FR 31685, June 7, 2007]
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3769

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 137 East Young High Pike in Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ‘‘Ben Atchley Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3769 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 137 East Young High Pike in Knoxville, Ten4 nessee, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ben 

5 Atchley Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Ben Atchley Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 2, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
§ 1253.225 Educational institutions eligible to submit transition plans. ( a ) *Application.* This section applies to each educational institution to which §§ 1253.300 through 1253.310 apply that: ( 1 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1972; or
( 2 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1965, but thereafter admitted, as regular students, students of the sex not admitted prior to June 23, 1965.
( b ) *Provision for transition plans.* An educational institution to which this section applies shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 1253.300 through 1253.310.
#### BEAN V. THE STATE.

(Decided January 20, 1914.)

Appeal from DeKalb Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Haralson!

E. P. Reid, for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and T. H. Seay,. Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Walker, P. J.

No error.

Affirmed.
### NUMBER 13

- 1 2

- 00 360

- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ELIZABETH LAHAYE , A ppellant ,

v.
DONNIE THOMPSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE ESTATE OF W.H. THOMPSON (WILLIAM HUGHES THOMPSON REVOCABLE TRUST) , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 197 th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________ ______________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
This appeal was abated by this Court on June 25, 2012, due to the bankruptcy of
one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. ' 362; see generally T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 8.

This cause is now before the Court on the parties’ joint motion to dismiss appeal on2

grounds that the parties have settled and compromised their differences. The parties
request that this Court dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, this case is hereby

REINSTATED

. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the parties’ joint motion to
dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a).

The parties’ joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED , and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party

incur ring same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court
will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’
request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forth with.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 31st day of January , 20 1 3

.
#### § 1221.103 Establishment of the NASA Insignia.

The NASA Insignia was designed by the Army Institute of Heraldry and approved by the Commission of Fine Arts and the NASA Administrator. It symbolizes NASA's role in aeronautics and space and is established by the NASA Administrator as the signature and design element for visual communications formerly reserved for the NASA Logotype. The NASA Insignia shall be used as set forth in [§§ 1221.108](/on/2024-09-19/title-14/section-1221.108), the NASA Graphics Standards Manual, and any accompanying style guides or related NASA directive or specification approved by the NASA Administrator and published subsequent hereto.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER12NO20.001/ER12NO20.001_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER12NO20.001/ER12NO20.001_original_size.png)

[[85 FR 71828](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/85-FR-71828), Nov. 12, 2020]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3766

To provide for tax-exempt financing for United Nations facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2004

Mr. HOUGHTON (for himself and Mr. PAYNE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To provide for tax-exempt financing for United Nations 

facilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘United Nations Facility 

5 Financing Restoration Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING FOR UNITED NATIONS FA7 CILITIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 145 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) 

10 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub11 section: 
2

•HR 3766 IH 

1 ‘‘(f) SPECIAL RULE RELATING TO BONDS FOR

2 UNITED NATIONS FACILITIES.—

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this part, 

4 the term ‘qualified 501(c)(3) bond’ includes a bond 

5 issued as part of an issue 95 percent or more of the 

6 net proceeds of which are used to provide a United 

7 Nations facility described in paragraph (2). Such 

8 bonds need not satisfy the requirements of para9 graphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a). 

10 ‘‘(2) UNITED NATIONS FACILITY.—For pur11 poses of paragraph (1), the term ‘United Nations fa12 cility’ means property used by the United Nations or 

13 any agency or instrumentality thereof, whether or 

14 not constituting a 501(c)(3) organization, so long 

15 as—

16 ‘‘(A) such property is used in conjunction 

17 with, but is outside, the United Nations head18 quarters district, as defined in Annex 1 to the 

19 Agreement between the United Nations and the 

20 United States of America, as approved August 

21 4, 1947; and 

22 ‘‘(B) costs for such United Nations facility 

23 are first incurred after April 1, 2002. 

24 ‘‘(3) FINANCING NOT TREATED AS LOAN.—For 

25 purposes of section 148, financing of such United 
3

•HR 3766 IH 

1 Nations facility shall not be treated as a loan to the 

2 United Nations or otherwise by reason of 

3 unencumbered ownership by the United Nations of 

4 such United Nations facility when such bond is no 

5 longer outstanding.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

8 of this Act.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 23.2


[RSG GLOBAL LOGO]

CONSENT


Head Office:

1162 Hay Street


West Perth WA 6005


February 2005


P.O. Box 1671


West Perth WA 6872


Telephone: +61 8 9324 8800


Facsimile: +61 8 9324 8877


|               |                                   
|-------------- | ----------------------------------
|The Directors, | Email: info.australia@rsglobal.com

|                              |                              
|----------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Golden Star Resources Limited | Web: http://www.rsgglobal.com

I, Colin Jones, do hereby consent
to the inclusion of resource estimates and preliminary pit
optimisation results for the Paul Isnard Project, as
independently prepared by RSG Global in 2003, in the Form 10-K
of golden Star Resources Limited, and to the use of RSG
Global in the form and context in which it appears.

RSG Global understands that no
additional work has been completed a the Paul Isnard Project
since 2003, and that the resources as independently estimated by
RSG Global remain valid.

Dated this 2nd day of February 2004.

/s/ [Signature Illegible]



---

For and on behalf of


C.M. Jones, Partner


RSG Global PTY Ltd


C: \Documents and
Settings \ktaylor \Local Settings \Temporary
Internet Files \OLKA \RSG Consent S A Resources.doc

RSG Global Pty Ltd (ACN
101 090 135) as trustee for RSG Global Partnerhip (ABN 79 256
402 893)

P E R T
H               J
O H A N N E S B U R
G          A C C R
A               L
I M A

2
#### § 121.267 Extinguishing agent container pressure relief.

Extinguishing agent containers must be provided with a pressure relief to prevent bursting of the container because of excessive internal pressures. The discharge line from the relief connection must terminate outside the airplane in a place convenient for inspection on the ground. An indicator must be provided at the discharge end of the line to provide a visual indication when the container has discharged.
#### § 14.29 Judicial review.

If an applicant is dissatisfied with the determination of fees and other expenses made under this subsection, pursuant 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2), that applicant may, within thirty (30) days after the determination is made, appeal the determination to the court of the United States having jurisdiction to review the merits of the underlying decision of the FAA adversary adjudication. The court's determination on any appeal heard under this paragraph shall be based solely on the factual record made before the FAA. The court may modify the determination of fees and other expenses only if the court finds that the failure to make an award of fees and other expenses, or the calculation of the amount of the award, was unsupported by substantial evidence.
§ 16.29 Investigations. ( a ) If, based on the pleadings, there appears to be a reasonable basis for further investigation, the FAA investigates the subject matter of the complaint.
( b ) The investigation may include one or more of the following, at the sole discretion of the FAA: ( 1 ) A review of the written submissions or pleadings of the parties, as supplemented by any informal investigation the FAA considers necessary and by additional information furnished by the parties at FAA request. In rendering its initial determination, the FAA may rely entirely on the complaint and the responsive pleadings provided under this subpart. Each party shall file documents that it considers sufficient to present all relevant facts and argument necessary for the FAA to determine whether the sponsor is in compliance.
( 2 ) Obtaining additional oral and documentary evidence by use of the agency's authority to compel production of such evidence under 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 46104, and 49 U.S.C. 47122. The Administrator's statutory authority to issue compulsory process has been delegated to the Chief Counsel, the Deputy Chief Counsel, the Assistant Chief Counsel for Airports and Environmental Law, and each Assistant Chief Counsel for a region or center.
( 3 ) Conducting or requiring that a sponsor conduct an audit of airport financial records and transactions as provided in 49 U.S.C. 47107 and 47121.
[Doc. No. 27783, 61 FR 54004, Oct. 16, 1996, as amended at Amdt. 16-1 78 FR 56145, Sept. 12, 2013]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1868

MICHAEL L. PACK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Mayor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.

(1:05-cv-03081-BEL)

Submitted: December 14, 2007 Decided: December 28, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Pack, Appellant Pro Se. James R. Benjamin, Jr.,

BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Pack seeks to appeal the district court’s

order and correspondence informing him the Appellee filed a motion

to dismiss and granting the motion to dismiss. We dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was

not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

February 16, 2007. The notice of appeal was filed on August 30,

2007. Because Pack failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1275.106 Administrative actions. ( a ) Listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section are possible administrative actions that may be recommended by the investigation report and adopted by the adjudication process. They are not exhaustive, and are in addition to any administrative actions necessary to correct the research record. The administrative actions range from minimal restrictions (Group I Actions) to severe restrictions (Group III Actions), and do not include possible criminal sanctions. ( 1 ) Group I Actions. ( i ) Send a letter of reprimand to the individual or institution.
( ii ) Require as a condition of an award that for a specified period of time an individual, department, or institution obtain special prior approval of particular activities from NASA.
( iii ) Require for a specified period of time that an institutional official other than those guilty of research misconduct certify the accuracy of reports generated under an award or provide assurance of compliance with particular policies, regulations, guidelines, or special terms and conditions.
( 2 ) Group II Actions. ( i ) Restrict for a specified period of time designated activities or expenditures under an active award.
( ii ) Require for a specified period of time special reviews of all requests for funding from an affected individual, department, or institution to ensure that steps have been taken to prevent repetition of the research misconduct.
( 3 ) Group III Actions. ( i ) Immediately suspend or terminate an active award.
( ii ) Debar or suspend an individual, department, or institution from participation in NASA programs for a specified period of time.
( iii ) Prohibit participation of an individual as a NASA reviewer, advisor, or consultant for a specified period of time.
( b ) In deciding what actions are appropriate when research misconduct is found, NASA officials should consider the seriousness of the misconduct, including, but not limited to: ( i ) The degree to which the misconduct was knowing, intentional, or reckless;
( ii ) Whether the misconduct was an isolated event or part of a pattern;
( iii ) Whether the misconduct had a significant impact on the research record, research subjects, or other researchers, institutions, or the public welfare.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-40265

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jorge Damian Soliz, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:20-CR-1105-1

______________________________

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Damian 

Soliz, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Soliz has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 6, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-40265 Document: 56-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/06/2024
No. 23-40265

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-40265 Document: 56-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/06/2024
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "BAKER, RUSSELL J" <rjbaker@oppd.com> Date: 7/7/2010 3:13 PM Subject: Re: Request for Extension - Omaha Public Power District Plant IDs 04781 and 07815 Attachments: pic06558.jpg; Omaha Public Power District Request for Extension Plant IDs 04781 and 07815.pdf

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnair e unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic06558.jpg)

From: "BAKER, RUSSELL J" <rjbaker@oppd.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/07/2010 03:09 PM

Subject: Request for Extension - Omaha Public Power District Plant IDs 04781 and 07815

Ms. Alicea, Please find the attached request for a 60-day extension to complete the Steam Electric Power Generating Industry Effluent Guidelines Information Collection Request for the OPPD’s North Omaha Station (Plant ID 07815) and Nebraska City Station (04781).

Thank you,

Russ Baker Environmental & Regulatory Affairs OPPD Omaha Public Power District Your Energy Partner 444 South 16th Street Mall Omaha, NE 68102-2247 Phone: 402-636-2316
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Quicksilver Resources Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Glenn DardenGlenn DardenPresident and Chief Executive Officer