alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 135.336 Airline transport pilot certification training program. ( a ) A certificate holder may obtain approval to establish and implement a training program to satisfy the requirements of § 61.156 of this chapter. The training program must be separate from the air carrier training program required by this part.
( b ) No certificate holder may use a person nor may any person serve as an instructor in a training program approved to meet the requirements of § 61.156 of this chapter unless the instructor: ( 1 ) Holds an airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane category multiengine class rating;
( 2 ) Has at least 2 years of experience as a pilot in command in operations conducted under § 91.1053(a)(2)(i) of this chapter, § 135.243(a)(1) of this part, or as a pilot in command or second in command in any operation conducted under part 121 of this chapter;
( 3 ) Except for the holder of a flight instructor certificate, receives initial training on the following topics: ( i ) The fundamental principles of the learning process;
( ii ) Elements of effective teaching, instruction methods, and techniques;
( iii ) Instructor duties, privileges, responsibilities, and limitations;
( iv ) Training policies and procedures; and
( v ) Evaluation.
( 4 ) If providing training in a flight simulation training device, holds an aircraft type rating for the aircraft represented by the flight simulation training device utilized in the training program and have received training and evaluation within the preceding 12 months from the certificate holder on: ( i ) Proper operation of flight simulator and flight training device controls and systems;
( ii ) Proper operation of environmental and fault panels;
( iii ) Data and motion limitations of simulation;
( iv ) Minimum equipment requirements for each curriculum; and
( v ) The maneuvers that will be demonstrated in the flight simulation training device.
( c ) A certificate holder may not issue a graduation certificate to a student unless that student has completed all the curriculum requirements of the course.
( d ) A certificate holder must conduct evaluations to ensure that training techniques, procedures, and standards are acceptable to the Administrator.
[Doc. No. FAA-2010-0100, 78 FR 42379, July 15, 2013]
Exhibit 99.2
  
     Net Proved Reserves and Net Cash Flow(1)Category
    
    Producing
    
    Non-Producing
    
    Undeveloped
    
    Total(2)Net Remaining ReservesOil - MBbl
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0Gas - MMcf
    
    
    201,325
    
    
    
    21,974
    
    
    
    29,753
    
    
    
    253,053NGL - MBbl
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    13Income Data (US M$)Future Net Revenue (US M$)
    
    
    365,252
    
    
    
    32,138
    
    
    
    21,912
    
    
    
    419,302Discounted PV @ 10% (US M$)
    
    
    224,497
    
    
    
    17,239
    
    
    
    1,173
    
    
    
    242,909
 
 (1)
    
    Includes reserves and cash flow attributable to split-title properties.   For proved developed producing,
split-title cases contribute 4,008 MMCF of net gas reserves and M $5,284 of the PV discounted at 10%.   For proved
developed non-producing, the contribution is 3,978 MMCF of net gas reserves and M $2,762 of the PV discounted at 10%.  
For proved undeveloped, the contribution is 18,244 MMCF of net gas and M$ -63 of the PV10%.(2)
    
    The total proved column may not match the sum of the detailed economic summaries by reserve category due
to rounding by the economics program.




---



##### 



Exhibit 99.2




---



##### 



Exhibit 99.2




---



##### 



Exhibit 99.2
  Very truly yours,

LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd.
State of Texas Registration Number F-1360
/s/ Joe A. Young
Joe A. Young
Licensed Professional Engineer
State of Texas No. 62866
/s/ Stephen W. Daniel
Stephen W. Daniel
Licensed Professional Engineer
State of Texas No. 58581 09-910
MBUAPCD

SIP Completeness Checklist 1 

### MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

RULE NUMBER: 900 DATE AMENDED: 4/20/05

REGULATION TITLE: Inspection of Public Records - Disclosure Policy

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Attached/Not Attached*

X COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE. If amended rule, indicate changes in underline and strikeout format, compared to existing approved SIP version.

X REFERENCE TO OTHER RULES. If the rule contains a reference

to any other rule, attach a copy of that other rule unless it has already been submitted to EPA as a part of a previous SIP submittal.

X PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE. Include a copy of the newspaper clipping certification with date of publication. Include a copy of notice from each newspaper.

X RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER. Must include Board Clerk certification that hearing was held in accordance with information in the public notice; must also include list of rules adopted or amended, dat e of public hearing, and statement of compliance with H&SC Sections 40725-40728 [Administrative Procedures Act].

X PUB LIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Any written comments submitted to the District during pubic notice period or at the hearing; also include any written responses prepared by the District as normal District procedure.MBUAPCD

SIP Completeness Checklist 2 OTHER INFORMATION

Attached/Not Attached

X MODELING SUPPORT. Provide as appropriate; not required for

VOC and NOx rules; required where rule is a relaxation in an attainment

area for SO2, PM10, CO, or NOx [for NO2 purposes]; for relaxation or shift of emissions in nonattainment area for SO2, PM10, CO, and NOx, give reference to the approved SIP.

X ECONOMIC/TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DE VIATIONS

FROM EPA POLICIES: As appropriate, describe special circumstances, i.e., where alternative RACT is used, extended compliance dates included, etc.**

X ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: Any other supporting information, such as staff reports , which are included with the rule package but not specifically required in the checklist above.

------------- * Attached separate sheet for each rule explaining why any materials are not included and when they will be submitted to the ARB.

** Completed enforcement checklist will fulfill this requirement.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-38 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Exhibit 13 to Injunction Request Dkt 2-13 Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-38 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Exhibit 13 to Injunction Request Dkt 2-13 Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-38 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Exhibit 13 to Injunction Request Dkt 2-13 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3734 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3734

   To designate the Federal building located at Fifth and Richardson 
 Avenues in Roswell, New Mexico, as the ``Joe Skeen Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2004

 Mrs. Wilson of New Mexico (for herself, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. 
  Pearce, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Brady of Texas, Ms. Hart, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. 
 Issa, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Herger, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Fattah, 
 Mr. Nunes, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Ney, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Upton, Mr. Hoekstra, 
  Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Shays, Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Tom 
  Davis of Virginia, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
 Shaw, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Hayes, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Tauzin, Mr. Cunningham, 
Ms. Kaptur, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Simpson, Mr. 
 Rogers of Michigan, Mr. Rehberg, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Boozman, 
 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Platts, Mr. Akin, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. 
  Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Hastings of Washington, Mrs. 
 Musgrave, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Burr, Mr. Walden of Oregon, Mr. Kline, Ms. 
 Harris, Mr. Carter, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Goss, Mr. Kirk, 
Mr. Collins, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Whitfield, Mr. Spratt, Mr. Skelton, Mr. 
   Frank of Massachusetts, Ms. Harman, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Regula, Mr. 
Graves, Mr. Thomas, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Renzi, and Mr. Hayworth) introduced 
      the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the Federal building located at Fifth and Richardson 
 Avenues in Roswell, New Mexico, as the ``Joe Skeen Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at Fifth and Richardson Avenues in 
Roswell, New Mexico, shall be known and designated as the ``Joe Skeen 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joe Skeen Federal 
Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### J. M. WISE AND ANOTHER v. W. F. MORRISSEY AND ANOTHER.1

December 22, 1916.

Nos. 20,067—(173).

Sale — holding out as partners — failure to disprove.

Action, for price of goods sold to defendants as partners. Appellants’ answer denied the partnership and the sale. Plaintiffs’ proof was convincing that the goods were sold on the strength of defendants holding themselves out as partners by advertisement and by their mode of doing business. *Held:*Plaintiffs made a *prima facie*case which could not be overcome by simply showing that no partnership existed. It did not appear that appellant had any evidence that there was no holding out of a partnership by him, or that plaintiffs had knowledge of the true situation, or that the sale was not made in reliance on the holding out. Judgment affirmed. [Reporter.]

Action in justice court by the partners doing business as C. Wise & Sons to recover $11.35. From the judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appealed on questions of law alone to the district court for Wabasha county. The appeal was héard before Granger, J., who made findings and affirmed the judgment entered in justice court. From the judgment entered in district court pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant; appealed.

Affirmed.

*Henry W. Morgan,*for appellant.

*George H. Hammond,*for respondents.

1

Reported in 160 N. W. 487.

Per Curiam.

Suit against defendants for the balance of $11.35 of a bill of goods alleged to have been sold to them as partners by plaintiffs. The separate answer of defendant W. F. Morrissey denied the partnership and the sale. Plaintiffs’ proof did not establish a partnership in fact, but it was convincing that the goods were sold upon the strength of defendants holding themselves out as partners by advertisements to that effect and by their mode of doing business, both occupying for that purpose one store room. The.evidence is ample that both appellant and the other defendant approved of the wording of their business advertisements, published in both the local newspapers, which tend clearly to convey the idea that defendants were partners in business. *482Therefore it was not error to refuse to dismiss when plaintiffs rested. As one of the steps in the defense, it was perfectly proper to prove that there was no partnership in fact between defendants. There was error in excluding such proof. But this error is insufficient to reverse. Plaintiffs had made a *prima facie*case which could not be overcome simply by showing that no partnership existed between defendants. This defendant would have to go further, and show that there was no holding out of a partnership by him, or that plaintiffs had knowledge of the true situation notwithstanding a holding out to the world, or that the sale was not made by plaintiffs in reliance upon the holding out. Nothing of this sort of testimony was offered, and unless appellant had some such evidence at hand, and there is no suggestion in the record that he had, it would be of no avail to merely adduce proof of the nonexistence of a partnership.

The judgment must be affirmed.
<PAGE>

                              THE YUCAIPA COMPANIES

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27

October 9, 2002

Messrs. George G. Golleher and Tony Koupa                 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Members, Board of Directors                               Phone: (310)843-5260
Simon Marketing                                           Air Bill #__________
1888 Century Park East
Suite 222
Los Angeles, CA 90067

Re:      Management Agreement Dated November 10, 1999 Between The Yucaipa
         Companies, LLC and Cyrk, Inc., Now Known As Simon Marketing-Settlement
         Offer

Dear George and Tony:

Based on Previous discussions between you and other representatives of Simon and
representatives of Yucaipa, LLC, we have agreed that amounts due and payable
under the subject agreement should be handled separately from any "settlement"
or other disposition associated with ownership of Series A Preferred Stock of
Simon.

Pursuant to Section 8 of the Management Agreement dated November 10, 1999 (the
"Agreement") a termination fee is due and payable in the amount of $2,500,000.

In addition, under Section 3 of the Agreement, payments are due and payable for
the period December 2001 through October 2002 at $41,666.67 a month, none of
which payments have been received. The total payments in arrears under Section 3
are equal to $458,333.37.

The total due, pursuant to Section 8 and Section 3 of the Agreement, is
$2,958,333.37.

To avoid the cost and expense of litigation to collect the amounts due under the
Agreement, we are willing to accept $1,500,000, which equals approximately 50.7%
of our claim.

Upon receipt of a wire transfer in that amount, we agree that the subject
Agreement is terminated and of no further force or effect and further agree that
all payments of any kind of character, whether under Section 3, Section 8, or
any other provision of the Agreement, will be deemed paid in full and that no
further sums of any kind or character will be due or payable to The Yucaipa
Companies, LLC pursuant to the Agreement.

If Simon is in agreement with our settlement proposal, I would appreciate it if
you would execute a copy of this letter in the space provided below and return
it to my attention. If

           9130 West Sunset Boulevard / Los Angeles, California 90069
                    Telephone (310) 228-2894 / Fax (310) 789-1791

<PAGE>

Mr. George G. Golleher
October 3,2002
Page 2 of 2

payment is not received on or before October 17,2002, we will assume that there
is no interest in settlement and we will pursue our rights and remedies with
respect to the collection of amounts due under the Agreement.

We look forward to hearing from you.

The Yucaipa Companies, LLC

/s/ Robert P. Bermingham
------------------------------
By: Robert P. Bermingham,
    Vice President

The settlement proposal set forth in this letter is hereby agreed to and
accepted this 17th day of October, 2002.

Simon Worldwide Marketing

By:/s/ J. Anthony Kouba
   ----------------------------

RPB/mg

cc:      Ron Burkle
         Ira Tochner
         Steve Mortensen
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 84 (Monday, May 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10773]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans, Notice of Charter 
Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public 
Law 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Committee on Minority 
Veterans has been renewed for a period beginning April 18, 2000, 
through April 18, 2002.

    Dated: April 21, 2000.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Marvin R. Eason,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10773 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
§ 158.95 Implementation of reduction. ( a ) A reduction in apportioned funds will not take effect until the first fiscal year following the year in which the collection of the PFC is begun and will be applied in each succeeding fiscal year in which the public agency imposes the PFC.
( b ) The reduction in apportioned funds is calculated at the beginning of each fiscal year and shall be an amount equal to— ( 1 ) In the case of a fee of $3 or less, 50 percent of the projected revenues from the fee in the fiscal year but not by more than 50 percent of the amount that otherwise would be apportioned under this section; and
( 2 ) In the case of a fee of more than $3, 75 percent of the projected revenues from the fee in the fiscal year but not by more than 75 percent of the amount that otherwise would be apportioned under this section.
( c ) If the projection of PFC revenue in a fiscal year is inaccurate, the reduction in apportioned funds may be increased or decreased in the following fiscal year, except that any further reduction shall not cause the total reduction to exceed 50 percent of such apportioned amount as would otherwise be apportioned in any fiscal year.
[Doc. No. 26385, 56 FR 24278, May 29, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 158-2, 65 FR 34543, May 30, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 84 (Monday, May 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10831]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Job Training Partnership Act: Native American Employment and 
Training Council

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and section 401(k)(1) of the Job 
Training Partnership Act, as amended [29 U.S.C. 1671(k)(1)], notice is 
hereby given of the final meeting of the Native American Employment and 
Training Council as constituted under JTPA.
    Time and Date: The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. CDT on Thursday, 
May 25, 2000, and continue until 5:00 p.m. CDT that day. The meeting 
will reconvene at 9 a.m. CDT on Friday, May 26, 2000, and adjourn at 4 
p.m. CDT on that day. The period from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. CDT on May 25 
will be reserved for participation and presentation by members of the 
public.
    Place: The Rio Grande Ballroom of the Four Points Sheraton 
Riverwalk North Hotel, 110 Lexington Avenue, San Antonio, Texas 78205.
    Status: The meeting will be open to the public.
    Matters To Be Considered: The agenda will focus on the following 
topics: (1) Renewal of the Council charter under the Workforce 
Investment Act (WIA); (2) work group progress reports; (3) current 
status of WIA implementation efforts; (4) status of the WIA Final 
Regulations effort; (5) status of technical assistance and training 
provision for Program Years 2000 and 2001; and (6) status of WIA 
performance measures, reporting, and plan submission.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James C. DeLuca, Chief, Division 
of Indian and Native American Programs, Office of National Programs, 
Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room 
N-4641, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210.
    Telephone: (202) 219-8502 ext 119 (VOICE) or (202) 326-2577 (TDD) 
(these are not toll-free numbers).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of April, 2000.
Thomas M. Dowd,
Acting Director, Office of National Programs.
[FR Doc. 00-10831 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
§ 16.303 Procedures for handling ex parte communications. A decisional employee who receives or who makes or knowingly causes to be made a communication prohibited by § 16.303 shall place in the public record of the proceeding: ( a ) All such written communications;
( b ) Memoranda stating the substance of all such oral communications; and
( c ) All written responses, and memoranda stating the substance of all oral responses, to the materials described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
[Doc. No. 27783, 61 FR 54004, Oct. 16, 1996. Redesignated at Amdt. 16-1, 78 FR 56148, Sept. 12, 2013]
# Official Journal C 169A/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.169.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 169A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 549 June 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.169.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 169A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 549 June 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Europol |
| 2011/C 169A/01 | Notice of Recruitment: Deputy Director | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Europol

2011/C 169A/01

Notice of Recruitment: Deputy Director

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |
| 76 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 82 | |
| 91 | |
| 98 | |
| 114 | (DA) |
| 121 | (DA) |
| 122 | |
| 135 | |
| 140 | (BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV) |
| 142 | |
| 146 | |
| 147 | (EN/IT/MT/SV) |
| 155 | (EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 156 | |
| 157 | |
| 162 | |
| 169 | (EN) |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

76

(DE/EN/FR)

82

91

98

114

(DA)

121

(DA)

122

135

140

(BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV)

142

146

147

(EN/IT/MT/SV)

155

(EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

156

157

162

169

(EN)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
A1               6144655.47       6883290.04                0       125937037.35
A2                3989962.8                0                0           82098000
A3               11887747.2                0                0          235868000
APO                       0         16836.43                0         1452836.19
B                1962478.08                0                0           38765000
C                   1635390                0                0           32304000
D                1962478.08                0                0           38765000
E                 490606.92                0                0            9691000
F                2725640.64                0                0           58147000
G                 151406.28                0                0            3230000
H                 215868.76                0                0            4846000
IO               4346578.58                0                0                  0
J                  58880.22                0                0            1615000
K                 231628.81                0                0         6461530.05
RI                        0                0                0                  0
RII                       0                0                0                  0
RIII                      0                0                0                  0


</TABLE>
| Please wait... |
|----------------|