alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021406EN.01000401.xml

| 8.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10469 – GS/Charlesbank/MDVIP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 406/04)

On 30 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10469. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10469. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### § 125.359 Flight release under VFR.

No person may release an airplane for VFR operation unless the ceiling and visibility en route, as indicated by available weather reports or forecasts, or any combination thereof, are and will remain at or above applicable VFR minimums until the airplane arrives at the airport or airports specified in the flight release.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3642 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3642

   To require the Secretary of State to prepare an annual report on 
 progress made to eradicate poppy cultivation and prevent illicit drug 
                      trafficking in Afghanistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2003

  Ms. Waters introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of State to prepare an annual report on 
 progress made to eradicate poppy cultivation and prevent illicit drug 
                      trafficking in Afghanistan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANNUAL REPORT ON ERADICATION OF POPPY CULTIVATION AND 
              ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING IN AFGHANISTAN.

    (a) Annual Report.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State 
shall prepare and submit to the appropriate congressional committees a 
report that contains a detailed description on progress made during the 
prior year to eradicate poppy cultivation and prevent illicit drug 
trafficking in Afghanistan.
    (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``appropriate 
congressional committees'' means--
            (1) the Committee on International Relations and the 
        Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; 
        and
            (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on 
        Appropriations of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
10.10




Logo 2


ELEMENT
21 GOLF COMPANY














January
1, 2009





Element
21 Golf Co. (Element) agrees to employ Nataliya Hearn as its President and
CEO.  Dr. Hearn will work full time as an independent contractor,
while serving as President and CEO.  The term of employment will begin
January 1, 2009 for one year, renewable for additional two terms. The total term
of this contract is three years. During the term of this agreement Element will
pay Dr. Hearn $20,000 per month in cash/stock or option as requested by Dr.
Hearn.  The value of the shares is set at the closing price of the 5
day closing average as of the date of this agreement ($0.12).  The
Element common stock will be issued on monthly basis.  Element will
reimburse Dr. Hearn’s expenses incurred on behalf of Element.  Dr.
Hearn will also receive a stock option package of 200,000 per year at an
exercise price of $0.12.





Element
will be able to terminate Dr. Hearn at any time with complete repayment of any
outstanding debts to Dr. Hearn, a cash payment of $500,000 and 2,000,000 million
shares of common stock of EGLF.





All stock
will be issued in whatever name Dr. Hearn and in whatever denominations Dr.
Hearn requests.  All stock issuances will be adjusted for stock
splits, dividends or other changes to the common stock.  All stock
issued will be freely tradable and issued without
restriction.  Element will extend any and all indemnification rights
and D and O insurance (if any) coverage to Dr. Hearn in her capacity as Chief
Executive Officer and President as allowed by law.


















[Remainder
of this page intentionally blank; signature page follow]















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned, being all of the directors of ELEMENT 21 GOLF CORPORATION, have
executed this Contract, effective as of the date first written
above.








_____________________


Nataliya
Hearn








_____________________


Sergei
Bedziouk








_____________________


Mary
Bryan








_____________________


Benton
Wilcoxon
§ 1221.203 Nominations. ( a ) Formal nominations for award of the Congressional Space Medal of Honor on behalf of NASA will be made by the Administrator to the President.
( b ) Any person may recommend to the Administrator that an astronaut be nominated for award of the Medal. Such a recommendation must be in writing, and must describe in concise detail the events believed to warrant award of the Medal. The recommendation should, if appropriate, be accompanied by supporting documentation, such as eyewitness statements, extracts from official records, sketches, photographs, etc.
( c ) All recommendations for nominations submitted to the Administrator or made on his own initiative will be referred to the NASA Incentive Awards Board for the purpose of investigating and making findings of fact and giving advice to the Administrator.
( d ) Any recommendation involving an astronaut who is a member of the armed services on active duty or who is employed by another agency of the Federal Government but temporarily assigned or detailed to NASA shall also be transmitted to the Secretary of Defense or the head of the employing agency, as appropriate, for his or her recommendation.
( e ) The Administrator will forward to the President his recommendation, and that of the astronaut's employing agency, as appropriate.
Editorial Note on Part 725
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 725.22 Advances to insurance organizations. ( a ) In accordance with policies established by the NCUA Board, the Facility may advance funds to a State credit union share or deposit insurance corporation, guaranty credit union, guaranty association, or similar organization. Requests for such advances shall be supported by an application which sets forth and supports the need for the advance.
( b ) Advances under paragraph (a) shall be subject to the approval of the NCUA Board and shall be made subject to the following terms: ( 1 ) The advance shall be fully secured,
( 2 ) The maturity of the advance shall not exceed 12 months,
( 3 ) The advance shall not be renewable at maturity, and
( 4 ) The funds advanced shall not be relent at an interest rate exceeding that imposed by the Facility.
#### John Martin CONNOR *v.*STATE of Arkansas

5790

490 S.W. 2d 114

Opinion delivered January 29, 1973

[Rehearing denied March 5, 1973.]

*855
      *James E. Davis,*for appellant.

*Ray Thornton,*Atty. Gen., by: *Lonnie Powers,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*Morton Gitelman,*for American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, Inc., Amicus Curiae.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant was charged with sodomy by an act of fellatio (oral stimulation of penis) under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-815 (Repl. 1964). He appeals from his conviction on the grounds that no statute makes fellatio a public offense; that § 41-815 is so vague and broad as to deprive appellant of his federal constitutional rights; and the section establishes a religion and invades the right of privacy.

The cited statute reads: “Every person convicted of sodomy, or buggery shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary for a period of not less than one (1) nor more than twenty-one (21) years.”

The allegation that the statute does not cover the act of fellatio is without merit. In *Strum*v. *State,*168 Ark. 1012, 272 S.W. 559 (1925), we approved this definition: “The crime of sodomy, broadly and comprehensively speaking, consists of unnatural sexual relations between persons of the same sex, or with beasts, or between persons of different sex, but in an unnatural manner.” In *Mangrum*v. *State,*227 Ark. 381, 299 S.W. 2d 80, Mangrum was charged with sodomy by an act of fellatio and we specifically held: “Such information charged an offense denounced by Ark. Stats. Anno. § 41-815.” In at least one other case we sustained a conviction for the same offense. *Havens*v. *State,*217 Ark. 153, 228 S.W. 2d 1003 (1950).

Neither do we find any merit in the contention that the statute is vague and too broad in scope. The crime of sodomy has long been recognized by a host of jurisdictions *856as consisting of unnatural sex relations. *Smith*v. *State,*150 Ark. 265, 234 S.W. 32 (1921). Likewise, the same authority points out that the crime has always been referred to as the crime against nature. It is so referred to in Ark. Stats. Ann. § 41-814 (Repl. 1964). In *Smith*it is said that the common law furnishes a definition of sodomy and that it corresponds to our present definition. Whether it is called sodomy, buggery, or crime against nature — as it is often called interchangeably — it boils down to a simple definition that it is an unnatural sex act which is condemned. It is the opposite of a *natural*sex act; the manner of a *natural*sex act is well known, even to the young and the uneducated.

Of the allegation that sodomy should not be regulated because such acts are regarded as sinful by some religious groups, little need be said. If that theory were adopted then many of our criminal statutes would be emasculated. This brings us to the final argument, namely that § 41-813 invades the constitutional right of privacy. That question is not before us because the act was not committed in privacy. It occurred between the adult appellant and a fourteen year old boy, seated in an automobile on a public road adjacent to Interstate 30.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation (the
registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (a) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (a) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ronald E. Klingle
|                     
|Ronald E. Klingle    

Chief Executive Officer  For year
ended December 31, 2009

March 18, 2010
#### § 135.103 [Reserved]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24516 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 16:43:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24516 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 16:43:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24516 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 16:43:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24516 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 16:43:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24516 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 16:43:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 5
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7270

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DANIEL WAYNE WAMER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-984, CA-98-1455-2-11) Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Wayne Wamer, Appellant Pro Se. Miller Williams Shealy, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Daniel Wayne Wamer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wamer , Nos. CR-96-984; CA98-1455-2-11 (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 10.7

ICAGEN, INC.

Summary of 2008 Bonus Targets

Executive Officer 2008 Bonus Targets



|                                                                                                                       |  |                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Executive Officer                                                                                                      |  | Bonus Targets for 2008  
|P. Kay Wagoner, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer and President                                                           |  | Up to 50% of base salary
|Richard D. Katz, M.D., Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |  | Up to 40% of base salary
|Edward P. Gray, J.D., Senior Vice President, Intellectual Property, Chief Patent Counsel and Secretary                 |  | Up to 40% of base salary
|Seth V. Hetherington, Senior Vice President, Clinical and Regulatory Affairs                                           |  | Up to 40% of base salary

Target bonuses for Dr. Wagoner, Dr. Katz, Mr. Gray and Dr. Hetherington for 2008 will be based
on the achievement of specified corporate performance objectives. The corporate performance objectives include progression of research, preclinical and clinical development programs; increasing awareness of Icagen within the investment community;
achievement of corporate and business development objectives; timely, effective and efficient completion of public company reporting obligations; completing and maintaining policies and procedures for internal controls and compliance obligations;
and further developing the Companys intellectual property, technology portfolio, advisory panel and publication strategy in order to retain and build value.
§ 1261.409 Contracting for collection services. ( a ) When NASA determines that there is a need to contract for collection services, the following conditions shall apply: ( 1 ) The authority to resolve disputes, compromise claims, suspend or terminate collection action, and refer the matter for litigation must be retained by NASA.
( 2 ) The contractor shall be subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, to the extent specified in 5 U.S.C. 552a(m), and to applicable Federal and State laws and regulations pertaining to debt collection practices—for example, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. 1692), and 26 U.S.C. 6103(p)(4) and applicable regulations of the Internal Revenue Service;
( 3 ) The contractor must be required to account strictly for all amounts collected; and
( 4 ) The contractor must agree to provide any data contained in its files relating to collection actions and related reports, current address of debtor, and reasonably current credit information upon returning an account to NASA for subsequent referral to the Department of Justice for litigation.
( 5 ) The debt must not be subject to mandatory transfer to the Department of the Treasury for collection. See 31 CFR 901.5(a) and (b).
( b ) NASA shall use Government-wide debt collection contracts to obtain debt collection services provided by private collection contractors. See 31 CFR 901.5(b).
( c ) NASA shall fund private collection contractor contracts in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3728(d) or as otherwise permitted by law. See 31 CFR 901.5(c).
[45 FR 48104, July 18, 1980, as amended at 82 FR 29385, June 29, 2017]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23654 Filed:03/01/23 Entered:03/01/23 12:22:22 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23654 Filed:03/01/23 Entered:03/01/23 12:22:22 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00576-CV

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas;

and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellants

v.

Imperial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-12-002808, HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to abate this appeal pending settlement

negotiations. We grant the motion and abate the appeal until April 3, 2015. If the parties have 1

finalized a settlement by that date, they are instructed to file a motion to dismiss in accordance with

the settlement agreement. If the parties have not finalized a settlement by that date, they are instructed

to file a report informing this Court of the status of the appeal and requesting any necessary

extension of the abatement. All appellate deadlines will be tolled during the period of abatement.

When this appeal was filed, Susan Combs was the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the 1

State of Texas and Greg Abbott was the Attorney General of Texas. Glenn Hegar and Ken Paxton,

as successors to these offices, have been automatically substituted as parties to these proceedings.

See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(a).
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Abated

Filed: March 4, 2015

2
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


MIDDLE BAY OIL COMPANY, INC.
Statement of Computation of Per-Share Earnings
For the Year Ended December 31, 1996



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Fully
                                     Primary          Diluted
                                    ----------       ----------

<S>                                 <C>              <C>
Net Income                          $  205,500       $  205,500
                                    ----------       ----------
Adjusted Net Income                 $  205,500       $  205,500
                                    ==========       ==========

Divided By:

Weighted Average Shares              1,304,464        1,304,464

Plus:  Common Stock Equivalents
  Stock Options                         27,677           54,198
                                    ----------       ----------

Adjusted Weighted Average
  Shares                             1,332,141        1,358,662
                                    ----------       ----------

Earnings Per Share                  $    0.154       $    0.151
                                    ==========       ==========
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et 

al.,

Debtor.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO,

Debtor.

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATIONS

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:

The undersigned is admitted and authorized to practice in this Court, and hereby appears 

in these Title III cases as counsel for the Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory 

Authority and requests that the Court take note of the foregoing. 

 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last four 

(4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico 

Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3567- LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); and (iv) Employees Retirement System of 

the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to 

software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2567 Filed:02/21/18 Entered:02/21/18 15:29:32 Desc: Main

 Document Page 1 of 2

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2581-1 Filed:02/23/18 Entered:02/23/18 14:43:59 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 2
2

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 21st day of February, 2018.

I HEREBY CERTIFY: That on this same date, the foregoing has been electronically 

filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will notify all counsel of 

record of such filing.

/s/ Mohammad S. Yassin

Mohammad S. Yassin, Esq.

USDC-PR Bar No. 302909

Mohammad.Yassin@aafaf.pr.gov

PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND 

FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY

Robert Sánchez Vilella (Minillas) Government Center

De Diego Avenue, Stop 22

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00907

Telephone: (787) 722-2525

Facsimile: (787) 721-1443

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2567 Filed:02/21/18 Entered:02/21/18 15:29:32 Desc: Main

 Document Page 2 of 2

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2581-1 Filed:02/23/18 Entered:02/23/18 14:43:59 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 2