1 

Filed 7/3/14 P. v. Puccetti CA3 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

COPY 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT 

(Tehama) 

---- 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

LEONARD ALLEN PUCCETTI, 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

C073821 

(Super. Ct. No. NCR84100) 

 Appointed counsel for defendant Leonard Allen Puccetti has filed an opening brief 

that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine 

whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 

436.) 

 Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 

30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days has elapsed and we 

have received no communication from defendant. Finding no arguable error that would 

result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we affirm the judgment. 
2 

 We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of 

the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.) 

 On February 1, 2012, defendant was stopped by Police Officer Randall Bassett 

while walking on a bike path. Officer Bassett told defendant to keep his hands where 

Bassett could see them; defendant did, and Bassett saw defendant’s hand was bleeding 

from a fall. Defendant appeared to be under the influence of a controlled substance. 

 Defendant admitted to using methamphetamine a couple of days prior. Defendant 

also admitted he had a syringe in his shirt pocket and a knife in his waistband. A second 

officer arrived; defendant was placed in handcuffs and arrested. 

 On May 10, 2012, law enforcement searched defendant’s home pursuant to a 

warrant. They found six people in defendant’s home, including Donna Piazza. Piazza 

said she had been living there for approximately two weeks. In her room, law 

enforcement found: two bags of methamphetamine totaling 3.1 grams, two 

methamphetamine pipes, and a digital scale. Piazza admitted selling methamphetamine 

from defendant’s home. 

 Defendant also was home. Law enforcement searched him and found a 

methamphetamine pipe in his shirt pocket. He admitted to selling methamphetamine 

from his home more than 20 times in the past month. Defendant also confirmed that 

Piazza was also selling methamphetamine from the residence. 

 By way of an amended information, the People charged defendant with 

maintaining a place for selling or using a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, 

§ 11366), and possession of paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364.1, subd. (a)). 

The People further alleged defendant was previously convicted of a serious or violent 

felony (Pen. Code, § 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)),1 served three prior terms in prison 

 

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. 
3 

(§ 667.5, subd. (b)), and committed the offenses with which he was charged while he was 

out on bail (§ 12022.1). 

 Defendant pleaded guilty to maintaining a place for selling or using a controlled 

substance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11366.) Defendant also admitted he was previously 

convicted of a serious or violent felony. (§ 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d).) The remaining 

charges and allegations were dismissed, including the charges alleged in Tehama County 

case No. NCR83479. 

 Prior to sentencing, defendant moved the court to withdraw his plea. The trial 

court denied the motion and sentenced defendant to an aggregate term of six years in 

state prison. The court also awarded defendant 389 days of custody credits and ordered 

him to pay various mandatory fines and fees. 

 Defendant appeals without a certificate of probable cause. 

 Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error 

that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. 

DISPOSITION

 The judgment is affirmed. 

 HULL , Acting P. J. 

We concur: 

 MURRAY , J. 

 HOCH , J.