alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of the Chief Financial Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350****(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**I, Timothy K. Schools, the Executive Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of The SouthFinancial Group, Inc. (“TSFG”) certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of thequarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 of TSFG (the “Report”):(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of TSFG.   */s/ Timothy K. Schools*   Timothy K. Schools  Executive Vice President and Principal Financial Officer  The South Financial Group, Inc.  November 14, 2005  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto The South Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
78
# pet.

Office of the Secretary

PO Box 94245 | Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245

ph: 225-379-1200 | fe; 225-379-1851 Bobby Jindal, Governor

Sherri H. LeBas, P.E., Secretary LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORrATION « DEVELOPMENT

Mr. Randall Fiertz, Director

Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (AGO)

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Ave SW

Washington, D.C. 20591

RE; Louisiana DOTD Aviation Taxation Information

Dear Mr. Fiertz,

The State of Louisiana has a dedicated Aviation Trust Fund (ATF) within the Transportation

Trust Fund. The revenue deposited into the ATF is derived from a 4% sales tax on Aviation

Gasoline and Jet Fuel sold in the state. The Louisiana Constitution provides for Transportation

Trust Fund monies derived from the sale of aviation fuel (which equates to the ATF) for the

construction and maintenance of airports.

Louisiana Revised Statutes (LRS), Title 2 state: Aeronautics allows for the creation of the

Airport Construction and Development Priority Program (LRS 2:801 et. seq.). The law also

provides that the “ Department ” (LA-DOTD) create procedures and rules for review and

evaluation of applications in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act and approved

by legislative committee. Louisiana Administrative Code, Title 70 is the location of these rules

to be followed when evaluating airport submitted projects.

Total funds derived from the 4% sales tax is $29.7 Million of which $1.3 million is used for the

operating budget of the Aviation Section of LA-DOTD to administer the Airport Construction

and Development Priority Program. The remaining $28.4 Million of the funds are used for the

Airport Construction and Development Priority Program and under current rule of law, must be

split between air carrier airport projects and general aviation airport projects at a 65%

- 35% ratio

respectively. These funds are to be used to fund the 10% match to Federal Projects (FAA) as

well as some 100% state-only projects. By way of example, please note that the most recently

legislatively approved aviation program may be found on our website at the following link

http://wwwsp.dotd.la.gov/Inside LaDOTD/Divisions/Multimodal/Aviation/Pages/Construction

Develonment.aspx

.

Should you need further information regarding Louisiana aviation funding information, please

feel free to contact me at (225) 379-3040 or brad.brandt@la.gov

.

Aviation Director

Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development | 1201 Capitol Access Road | Baton Rouge, LA 70802 | 225-379-1200 Sincerely,

An Equal Opportunity Employer | A Drug-Free Workplace | AgencyofLouisiana.gov | dotd.la.gov
§ 151.37 Sponsor eligibility. To be eligible to apply for an individual or joint project for development with respect to a particular airport a sponsor must— ( a ) Be a public agency, which includes for the purposes of this part only, a State, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam or an agency of any of them; a municipality or other political subdivision; a tax-supported organization; or the United States or an agency thereof;
( b ) Be legally, financially, and otherwise able to— ( 1 ) Make the certifications, representations, and warranties in the application form prescribed in § 151.67(a);
( 2 ) Make, keep, and perform the assurances, agreements, and covenants in that form; and
( 3 ) Meet the other applicable requirements of the Federal Airport Act and subparts B and C;
( c ) Have, or be able to obtain, enough funds to meet the requirements of § 151.23; and
( d ) Have, or be able to obtain, property interests that meet the requirements of § 151.25(a). For the purpose of paragraph (a) of this section, the United States, or an agency thereof, is not eligible for a project under subparts B and C, unless the project— ( 1 ) Is located in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or Guam;
( 2 ) Is in or is in close proximity to a national park, a national recreation area, or a national monument; or
( 3 ) Is in a national forest or a special reservation for United States purposes.
[Doc. No. 1329, 27 FR 12351, Dec. 13, 1962, as amended by Amdt. 151-8, 30 FR 8040, June 23, 1965]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service 

The following applicant has applied for approval to conduct certain activities with birds that are protected under the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992. This notice is provided under section 112, paragraph 4, of the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992, and title 50, of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 15.26(c). 

*Applicant:*                     G.A. Abbate, Elizabeth, NJ. The applicant wishes to establish a cooperative breeding program for the Venezuelan Black hooded Red siskin (                    *Carduelis cucullata*). The applicant wishes to be an active participant in this program with one other private individual. COM USA Inc. and its affiliate, The International Association for the Propagation and Conservation of All Avian Species (IAPCAAS) have assumed the responsibility for the oversight of the program.                 

                    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be received by the Director within 30 days of the date of this publication.                           ( print page 24710)    

Documents and other information submitted with these applications are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written request for a copy of these documents to the following office within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2095); FAX: (703/358-2298). 

Dated: April 24, 2000. 

Mark Phillips, 

Acting Chief, Branch of Operations, Office of Management Authority. 

[FR Doc. 00-10490 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-U
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:

     -    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     -    the information contained in the report fairly presents, on all
          material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
          operations.


/s/ Kevin A. Schmidt
----------------------------------------
Kevin A. Schmidt, Principal
Financial Officer

Dated: November 09, 2005


                                       29
----

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 October 2004

in Case T-3/03: Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corporation v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark - Partial refusal of registration - Withdrawal of the application - No need to adjudicate)

(2005/C 6/70)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-3/03: Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corporation, established in New York (United States), represented by A Renck, V. Bomhard, A. Pohlmann and C. Albrecht, lawyers, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: D. Schennen and G. Schneider) – action against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 October 2002 (Case R 391/2001-1) relating to the application for registration of the word mark ‘Choice of Champions’ – the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of: J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and S. Papasavvas, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 14 October 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

----

(1)OJ C 55 of 8.3.2003.

----
§ 171.13 Reports. The owner of each facility to which this subpart applies shall make the following reports on forms furnished by the FAA, at the times indicated, to the FAA Regional office for the area in which the facility is located: ( a ) *Record of meter readings and adjustments* (*Form FAA-198*). To be filled out by the owner with the equipment adjustments and meter readings as of the time of commissioning, with one copy to be kept in the permanent records of the facility and two copies to the appropriate Regional office of the FAA. The owner shall revise the form after any major repair, modernization, or returning, to reflect an accurate record of facility operation and adjustment.
( b ) *Facility maintenance log* (*FAA Form 6003-1*). This form is a permanent record of all equipment malfunctioning met in maintaining the facility, including information on the kind of work and adjustments made, equipment failures, causes (if determined), and corrective action taken. The owner shall keep the original of each report at the facility and send a copy to the appropriate Regional office of the FAA at the end of the month in which it is prepared.
( c ) *Radio equipment operation record* (*Form FAA-418*). To contain a complete record of meter readings, recorded on each scheduled visit to the facility. The owner shall keep the original of each month's record at the facility and send a copy of it to the appropriate Regional office of the FAA.
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) *VOR ground check error data* (*Forms FAA-2396 and 2397*). To contain results of the monthly course accuracy ground check in accordance with FAA Handbook AF P 6790.9 “Maintenance Instructions for VHF Omniranges”. The owner shall keep the originals in the facility and send a copy of each form to the appropriate Regional office of the FAA on a monthly basis.
(49 U.S.C. 1348)
[Doc. No. 5034, 29 FR 11337, Aug. 6, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 171-5, 34 FR 15245, Sept. 30, 1969; Amdt. 171-10, 40 FR 36110, Aug. 19, 1975]
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.4


                          SECOND AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS OF
                           COSINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation

THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT TO THE BYLAWS OF COSINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., A DELAWARE
CORPORATION, WAS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON JANUARY 28, 2003:

         ARTICLE 3.2

         Article 3.2 was amended to read in its entirety as follows:


         3.2 NUMBER OF DIRECTORS

                  The authorized number of directors shall be five (5). This
         number may be changed by a duly adopted resolution of the board of
         directors.

                  No reduction of the authorized number of directors shall have
         the effect of removing any director before that director's term of
         office expires.

                  A class of directors shall be elected at each annual meeting
         of stockholders as provided in Section 3.3 of these bylaws. Each
         director, including a director elected to fill a vacancy, shall hold
         office until the earlier of their death, resignation or expiration of
         the term for which elected and until a successor has been elected and
         qualified.

         ARTICLE 3.7

         Article 3.7 was amended to read in its entirety as follows:


         3.7 SPECIAL MEETINGS; NOTICE

             Special meetings of the board of directors for any purpose or
         purposes may be called at any time by the chairman of the board, the
         president, any vice president, the secretary or any two directors.

             Notice of the time and place of special meetings shall be delivered
         personally or by telephone to each director or sent by first-class mail
         or telegram, charges prepaid, or by email or other electronic
         transmission, addressed to each director at that director's address as
         it is shown on the records of the corporation. If the notice is mailed,
         it shall be deposited in the United States mail at least four (4) days
         before the time of the holding of the meeting. If the notice is
         delivered personally or by telephone or email, it shall be so delivered
         at least forty-eight (48) hours before the time of the holding of the
         meeting. If the notice is delivered by telegram, it shall be delivered
         to the telegraph company at least forty-eight (48) hours before the
         time of the holding of the meeting. Any oral notice given personally or
         by telephone may be communicated either to the director or to a person
         at the office of the director who the person giving the notice has
         reason to believe will promptly communicate it to the director. The
         notice need not specify the purpose or the place of the meeting, if the
         meeting is to be held at the principal executive office of the
         corporation.
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Ron Howell, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2011;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: August 15, 2011  \s\ Ron Howell Ron Howell Interim Chief Financial Officer
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 09

- 00495

- CR
Latara PRIESTLY , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 25th Judicial District Court , Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 07

- 1068

- CR Honorable Dwight E. Peschel , Judge Presiding Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 15, 2010
AFFIRMED Latara Priestly pleaded guilty to three counts of forgery and was placed on three years deferred adjudication community supervision. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Priestly’s community supervision and enter an adjudication of guilt, alleging Priestly had violated the terms of her community super vision by, among other things, using drugs, failing to report to her supervision officer, failing to maintain employment, failing to complete programs ordered by the court, and neglecting to pay administrative fees and court costs. After a hearing04

- 09

- 00495

- CR

- 2

- on the State’s motion, the trial court adjudicated Priestly guilty and sentenced her to two years imprisonment. We affirm. Priestly’s court

- appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. Californ ia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel provided Priestly with a copy of the brief and informed Priestly of her right to review the record and file her own brief. See Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2 d 83, 85

- 86 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Priestly did not file a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should P riestly wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, she must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary revi ew must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that was overruled by this court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 68.3; 68.7. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 68.4. Cath erine Stone, Chief Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
- 2

- 1 Caicco 39

- 003270 $155.30 $178.88 $0.01

2 Cobb, Sr. 54

- 089500 $169.90 $195.70 $0.02

3 Fincham 54

- 082075 $224.24 $258.29 $0.02

4 Gwin 54

- 152927 $90.35 $104.07 $0.01

5 Hippely 54

- 114550 $113.61 $130.86 $0.01

6 Lanning,

Harold &

Rosalie 54

- 153033 $16.56 $19.07 $0.01

7 Lanning, Marilyn 54

- 083850 $107.64 $123.98 $0.01

8 Mowen 54

- 016920 $105.02 $120.97 $0.01

9 Ohio Edison

Co. 28

- 901531 $311.33 $358.60 $0.03

1 0 Warren R C

Inc 38

- 003007 $328.75 $378.67 $0.03

TOTAL $1869.09 $0.16

The J oint S tipulation also includes the following representation: “ Payment in accordance with paragraph 4 shall constitute a full, complete, and final resolution of all P laintiffs’ claims and defenses, legal or equitable, arising out of this lawsuit, except for claims for the reimbursement of costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act.” Id. ⁋ 6.

The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act provides

, “The court rendering a judgment for the plaintiff in a proceeding . . . award ing compensation for the taking of property by a Federal agency . . . shall determine and award . . . such sum . . . including reasonable attorney, appraisal, and engineering fees, actually incurred because of such proceedings.” 42 U.S.C. § 4654(c). A co mplete judgment accordingly requires consideration of attorneys’ fees. Id. RCFC 54(b) states :

When an action presents more than one claim for relief

— whether as a claim, counterclaim, or third

- party claim

— or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no reason for delay.- 3

- The J oint S tipulation does not settle the issue of attorneys’ fees

, so the Court must enter partial judgment. J oint Stip. for Partial J. ⁋ 6. The Court determines “there is no reason for d elay of judgment” for the compensation to the landowners because the remaining issue

— attorneys’

fees

— does not affect the agreed upon compensation to plaintiffs. See RCFC 54(b).

Pursuant to RCFC 54(b) and in accordance with the J oint S tipulation, ECF No. 89, t he

Clerk is DIRECTED to enter partial judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $ 1,869.09 and additional interest of $0

. 16 per day from 1 January 2023 through the date of payment, to each plaintiff as listed in Exhibit A of the J oint S tipulation. The parties SHALL FILE a joint

status report on or before 7 July 2023 proposing a briefing schedule on plaintiffs’ request for attorneys’ fees or requesting a nother stay of proceeding s on the remaining issues

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Ryan T. Holte

RYAN T. HOLTE Judge