alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3758 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3758

To amend the Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement Act of 2000 to make 
                     certain technical corrections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2020

Mr. Merkley (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement Act of 2000 to make 
                     certain technical corrections.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KLAMATH BASIN WATER SUPPLY ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 2000 TECHNICAL 
              CORRECTIONS.

    Section 4(b) of the Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2222; 132 Stat. 3887) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)--
                            (i) by striking ``Pursuant to the 
                        reclamation laws and subject'' and inserting 
                        ``Subject''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``may'' and inserting ``is 
                        authorized to''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``, including 
                conservation and efficiency measures, land idling, and 
                use of groundwater,'' after ``administer programs'';
            (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by inserting ``and'' after the 
        semicolon at the end;
            (3) by redesignating the second paragraph (4) (relating to 
        the effect of the subsection) as paragraph (5); and
            (4) in paragraph (5) (as so redesignated)--
                    (A) by striking subparagraph (B);
                    (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; or'' and 
                inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking ``the Secretary--'' and all that 
                follows through ``to develop'' in subparagraph (A) and 
                inserting ``the Secretary to develop''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 27, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60680 Summary Calendar

JUAN MARIO SIFUENTES-GARCIA, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A75-214-007

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Mario Sifuentes-Garcia (Sifuentes) appeals the affirmance by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of a motion for continuance of the removal proceeding. Sifuentes contends that he should have been granted the continuance so that he could challenge the 2003 alien-smuggling conviction that rendered him removable. This court reviews the denial of a continuance for abuse of discretion. Witter v. INS , 113 F.3d 549, 555-56 (5th Cir. 1997). An IJ may grant a continuance upon a showing of good cause. Id.No. 05-60680 -2- Sifuentes cites to two BIA decisions having nothing to do with the granting of a continuance, and he makes no argument directly relevant to the “good cause” that must be shown in order to obtain a continuance. Sifuentes fails to show that the denial of a continuance was an abuse of discretion. His petition for review is DENIED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, Allan J. Marter, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Golden Star Resources
Ltd., certify, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the period ended December 31, 2004 of Golden Star Resources Ltd. that: (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Golden Star Resources Ltd. /s/ Allan J. MarterAllan J. MarterSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 22, 2005
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-10-00069- CV The State of Texas, App ellant

v. 7KX Investm ents, Appellee
F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 1 O F B ELL COUNTY NO. 50,8 96, H ONO RAB LE EDWARD S. J OH NSO N, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss appea l. They repr esent that they have rea ched an agr ee ment to settle this matter and reque st that we set aside the trial court’s judgme nt without reg ard to the merits and rema nd the case to the trial court for rendition o f j u d gm en t i n acc ordanc e with the parties’ ag ree ment. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (2)( B) . We gr ant the motion, set aside the trial court’s judgme nt without reg ard to the m erits, and rema nd this cause to the t rial court for rendition of judg ment in acc ordanc e with the par ties’ ag ree ment.__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Henson a nd Goodwin Vac ated a nd Remanded on Joint M otion Filed: May

3, 2011

2
Attachment 2Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:24637-3   Filed:06/22/23   Entered:06/22/23 19:25:02    Desc: 

Attachment 2   Page 1 of 1
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

EXPLANATION

Lithologic symbols

©
2
a
a

Organic material

Iron cementation or
staining; hardpan’

i2]
a
2

Phosphate nodules

Chert

He Fe
2
3

7

Calcareous clay
Limestone

No recovery, core lost
A mixture of symbols indicates a
mixed lithology

Other symbols
Lithologic correlation

Stratigraphic correlation

Limits of aluminum and
calcium phosphate zones

Alternating symbols indicate two or
three of the above corretotions
follow the some line

West

4

NWYANWY,
Sec. 14, T. 31S.,R. 19 E.

‘900 _1800¢pm

<
‘Riurinum

7 | phosphate
‘tone.

i Pa

4s

Sample number ond interval sampled
from lot 2545

Surfoce 7 —200com

Trace of gamma-ray log showing
intensity of radiation; cpm=
counts per minute

Scale, in feet
°

20

3

SWUSEY
Sec. 18, T. 31$.,R. 20 E.

0/800 cpm

‘Aluminum
phosphate
zone:

2

SWANEY
Sec. 20, T. 315.,R. 20. /

900¢pm /

BULLETIN 1046 PLATE 20

East

|
SWASEY

Elevation, in feet

Sec. 24, T. 315., R. 20E. ri40
© 800 cpm
we
ws
gs
° + 120
ee
a8
ae
ze
+ 100.
=
2
ie
ge
as
is
a 83
=e
ag 50
3
e
5
&
Ss | 60
aS
Fe
Qf
=a
z
wf
1 A 4s
ea
=r
L 40
f 20
L Sea level

CROSS SECTION 5, LAND-PEBBLE PHOSPHATE DISTRICT, FLORIDA

466352 © - 59 (In pocket)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 395 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 45
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 395

                          [Report No. 116-14]

   To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to 
  include a link to a 100 word plain language summary of the proposed 
                                 rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2019

   Mr. Lankford (for himself, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Risch, Mr. Peters, Mr. 
 Roberts, and Mr. Jones) introduced the following bill; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

                             March 25, 2019

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to 
  include a link to a 100 word plain language summary of the proposed 
                                 rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Accountability Through 
Transparency Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100 WORD SUMMARY TO REGULATIONS.GOV.

    Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) the Internet address of a summary of not more than 
        100 words in length of the proposed rule, in plain language, 
        that shall be posted on the Internet website under section 
        206(d) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) 
        (commonly known as regulations.gov).''.
                                                        Calendar No. 45

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 395

                          [Report No. 116-14]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to 
  include a link to a 100 word plain language summary of the proposed 
                                 rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 25, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```
EXHIBIT E

Summary of Segal Consulting Hours Worked and Fees Incurred

 

Name Title Department

Hourly 

Billing 

Rate

Total 

Billed 

Hours

Total Fees 

Billed

Bohlman, Katherine R. Actuary Associate Pension 320.00 2.20 704.00

Bridges, Geoffrey W. Actuary Pension 452.68 230.80 104,479.00

Fuhrer, Charles Sr Health Consultant Health 540.00 2.10 1,134.00

Janus, Paul J Actuary Health 422.54 41.30 17,451.00

Kompare, Pamela M. Senior Consultant Health 440.00 12.80 5,632.00

Kovach, Patricia L. Analyst Health 250.93 73.20 18,368.00

Libauskas, Jacob Actuary Pension 376.77 162.00 61,037.00

Nicholl, Kim M. Senior Vice President Pension 680.00 167.20 113,696.00

Noonan, Mark J. VP & Consulting 

Actuary Health 551.39 3.60 1,985.00

Strom, Matthew A. VP & Actuary Pension 539.52 147.00 79,310.00

Tabernacki, Patryk Senior Analyst Pension 321.64 148.20 47,667.00

Wohl, Stuart SVP Regional 

Manager Health 600.34 59.20 35,540.00

Worrell, Mildeen VP, Compliance Health 470.00 0.80 376.00

Sub-Total 1,050.40 487,379.00

Less 50% Discount on Non-Working Travel Matter: (12,670.00)

Total Fees for Interim Period 474,709.00

Plus Amount Inadvertently Excluded from First Interim Application 8,211.00

Total Fees Requested 482,920.00

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2742-5 Filed:03/19/18 Entered:03/19/18 19:07:09 Desc:

Exhibit E Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

and the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost
Plus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period May 3, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Barry J. Feld, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Jane L.
Baughman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/ Barry J. Feld                 
|Barry J. Feld                     
|Chief Executive Officer, President
|(Principal Executive Officer)     
|                                  
|June 9, 2008                      
|                                  
|/s/ Jane L. Baughman              
|Jane L. Baughman                  
|Executive Vice President,         
|Chief Financial Officer           
|(Principal Financial Officer)     
|                                  
|June 9, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ending April 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I Christopher J. Ryan, Chief
Executive Officer, President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christopher J. Ryan
-----------------------------
Christopher J. Ryan
Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary
and General Counsel

June 14, 2004


                                                                              18
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3587 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3587

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to give priority in the 
issuance of immigrant visas to the sons and daughters of Filipino World 
  War II veterans who are or were naturalized citizens of the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2003

Mr. Case (for himself and Ms. Bordallo) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to give priority in the 
issuance of immigrant visas to the sons and daughters of Filipino World 
  War II veterans who are or were naturalized citizens of the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIORITY FOR SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF FILIPINO WORLD WAR II 
              VETERANS.

    Section 203(e)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1153(e)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, in making visas available 
within any category established under such subsections, priority shall 
be given to any otherwise eligible child, son, or daughter of a person 
who was naturalized pursuant to section 405 of the Immigration Act of 
1990 (8 U.S.C. 1440 note).''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 135.160 Radio altimeters for rotorcraft operations. ( a ) After April 24, 2017, no person may operate a rotorcraft unless that rotorcraft is equipped with an operable FAA-approved radio altimeter, or an FAA-approved device that incorporates a radio altimeter, unless otherwise authorized in the certificate holder's approved minimum equipment list.
( b ) *Deviation authority.* The Administrator may authorize deviations from paragraph (a) of this section for rotorcraft that are unable to incorporate a radio altimeter. This deviation will be issued as a Letter of Deviation Authority. The deviation may be terminated or amended at any time by the Administrator. The request for deviation authority is applicable to rotorcraft with a maximum gross takeoff weight no greater than 2,950 pounds. The request for deviation authority must contain a complete statement of the circumstances and justification, and must be submitted to the responsible Flight Standards office, not less than 60 days prior to the date of intended operations.
[Doc. No. FAA-2010-0982, 79 FR 9973, Feb. 21, 2014, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 135-139, 83 FR 9175, Mar. 5, 2018]
```

[Federal Register: August 25, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 164)]
[Notices]               
[Page 52314-52315]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25au10-45]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DoD-2009-HA-0186]

 
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 24, 2010.
    Title and OMB Number: Women, Infants and Children Overseas 
Participant Satisfaction Survey; OMB Control Number 0720-TBD.

[[Page 52315]]

    Type of Request: New.
    Number of Respondents: 150.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 150.
    Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 38 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain the participants satisfaction levels with the services 
provided by the WIC overseas staff and the overall program. The 
findings from these surveys will be used to determine the success of 
the WIC overseas program and if improvements are necessary.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Kraemer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: August 2, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-21113 Filed 8-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
§ 120.39 Testing for alcohol. ( a ) Each certificate holder must establish an alcohol testing program in accordance with the provisions of subpart F of this part.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no certificate holder or operator may use any individual who meets the definition of covered employee in subpart A of this part to perform a safety-sensitive function listed in that subpart F of this part unless that individual is subject to testing for alcohol misuse in accordance with the provisions of that subpart.
( c ) If a certificate holder conducts an on-demand operation into an airport at which no maintenance providers are available that are subject to the requirements of subpart F of this part and emergency maintenance is required, the certificate holder may use individuals not meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section to provide such emergency maintenance under both of the following conditions: ( 1 ) The certificate holder must give written notification of the emergency maintenance to the Drug Abatement Program Division, AAM-800, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, within 10 days after being provided same in accordance with this paragraph. A certificate holder must retain copies of all such written notifications for two years.
( 2 ) The aircraft must be reinspected by maintenance personnel who meet the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section when the aircraft is next at an airport where such maintenance personnel are available.
( d ) For purposes of this section, emergency maintenance means maintenance that— ( 1 ) Is not scheduled and
( 2 ) Is made necessary by an aircraft condition not discovered prior to the departure for that location.
§ 158.67 Recordkeeping and auditing: Public agency. ( a ) Each public agency shall keep any unliquidated PFC revenue remitted to it by collecting carriers on deposit in an interest bearing account or in other interest bearing instruments used by the public agency's airport capital fund. Interest earned on such PFC revenue shall be used, in addition to the principal, to pay the allowable costs of PFC-funded projects. PFC revenue may only be commingled with other public agency airport capital funds in deposits or interest bearing instruments.
( b ) Each public agency shall establish and maintain for each approved application a separate accounting record. The accounting record shall identify the PFC revenue received from the collecting carriers, interest earned on such revenue, the amounts used on each project, and the amount reserved for currently approved projects.
( c ) At least annually during the period the PFC is collected, held or used, each public agency shall provide for an audit of its PFC account. The audit shall be performed by an accredited independent public accountant and may be of limited scope. The accountant shall express an opinion of the fairness and reasonableness of the public agency's procedures for receiving, holding, and using PFC revenue. The accountant shall also express an opinion on whether the quarterly report required under § 158.63 fairly represents the net transactions within the PFC account. The audit may be— ( 1 ) Performed specifically for the PFC account; or
( 2 ) Conducted as part of an audit under Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133 (the Single Audit Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98-502, and the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, Pub. L. 104-156) provided the auditor specifically addresses the PFC.
( 3 ) Upon request, a copy of the audit shall be provided to each collecting carrier that remitted PFC revenue to the public agency in the period covered by the audit and to the Administrator.
[Doc. No. 26385, 56 FR 24278, May 29, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 158-4, 72 FR 28851, May 23, 2007]