p. 1 

# OAR Box 1490 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 10 ) IV-B-1 0 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 8/4/200811:51:46

AM Sheet 10of 273P. 2 

# A-f-f-sz . JV-&-/D

TO : FROM : DATE : SUBJECT : 

### F e o 2 T ?.C3 3 EP A AI R DOCKE T MEMORANDU M RF P Docke t i . Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Jun e 14 , 200 2 Change s mad e t o th e RF P NESHA P cos t analysi s sinc e proposa l I n respons e t o industry comment s an dupdate ddata , w e mad e anumbe r o f change s t o th e MAC T databas e an dth e cos t analysi s calculations. Th e purpos e ofthi s memorandu mi s t o documen t th e change s t o th e cos t

analysis . Th e change s t o th e MAC T floo r databas e tha t

impac t th e cos t calculation s ar e include da s well . I n addition , w e hav e include ddiscussio n o f som e o f th e ke y change s suggeste db y commenter s tha t wer e considere dbu t

not mad e basedo n ou r revie w ofth e data . Th e reade r shoul drefer

t o BI D Volum e I I fo r

acomplet e discussio n o f al l comment s receive do n th e cos t analysis . MAC T FLOO RCOSTIN G Mechanica l NonCorrosio n Unfille d an d Fille d A t proposal , separat e MAC T floor s wer e identifie dfor mechanica l non-corrosio n unfille d an dmechanica l non-corrosio n fille dproces s groups . Thi s was don e i n larg e par t becaus e a t

tha t tim e non-atomize dresi n applicatio n wa s no t asuitabl e emissio n reductio n measur e whe n applyin g fille dresins . Base do n additiona l informatio n collecte dbetwee n proposa l an d promulgation , w e determine dtha t non-atomize dapplicatio n i s no w aviabl e alternativ e for filled resins . A s aresult , w e combine dthes e tw o proces s group s an ddetennine don e floo r for th e ne w mechanica l non-corrosio n proces s group . I n addition , w e update dth e MAC T floo r determination s base do n dat acorrection s an d update s receive dfro mindividua l facilitie s (detaile di n Tabl e 1) , an dw e adde dadditiona l -1
-P. 3 

## A facilitie s t o th e databas e andremovedfacilitie s tha t ar e no longe r in th e reinforce dplastic s busines s (detaile din Table 2) . Change s include dupdate dHA P content , materia

l usage , applicabl e proces s groups , an dcontro l technologies/efficiencies . W e als o replace dth e Point Value s wit

h UnifiedEmission Factor s fo r th e appropriat

e proces s groups . The combinatio n o f thes e change s resulte di

n ne w MAC T floors fo r severa l proces s groups . Thes e change s d

o not involv e direc t

change s t o the costing assumption s an dalgorithms , but change s in th e MAC

T floors an

dfacilit y specific dat

ad o result in new cos t

number s fo

r the MACT floo

r andfo r the cos t incremen t between MAC

T floo r contro l an

dabove-the-floor

add
on contro l requirements . Corrosion ResistantCentrifuga l Casting MAC T Floo rCost s Onl y tw o facilitie s i

n the databas e fal

l unde r th e corrosio n resistant

centrifuga l castin g proces s group : Fibercas t

wit h aHA P conten t of 47 % an dRave n Industrie s wit

h aHA P content of 49%o . The MACT floo

r i s 48% , the averag e of

value s fo r each ofth e tw o facilities . I n th e cos t analysi s fo r th e propose drule , neithe

r facilit y wa s assignedan

y cost s t o achiev e th e MAC T floor . I n revisitin g the analysis , we realize dtha t thi s wa s erroneous . W

e shouldhav e assigne d cost s to Raven Industrie s fo r usin g alowe

r HA P resi n tha t meet s the MACT floor . I

n th e revise d cos t analysis , cost s wer

e addedfo r thi s facilit y following all ofth e sam

e assumption s fo

r cost s of switchin g resin s i

n othe r proces s groups , an

dth e incrementa

l cos t use di s $0,455 , whic h wa s previously determine dt

o b e the cos t

fo r switchin g t

o corrosio n resistan

t resi n fo r an y ofth e corrosio n resistant

proces s groups . Remova l of Creditfo rCertain Control Techniques I n th e MACT floo

r determination s andcos t

calculation s fo

r proposal , tw o facilitie s in th e Manua l Non-corrosio n resistant

proces s grou

p wer e give n erroneously give

n emissio n reductio n credit fo r vacuu mbaggin g (i.e. , Monarch Plasti c an dShenandoa

h Fiberglass) . Tha

t credi t wa s remove din th e revise dfloo r determination s an

dcos t calculations . Similarly , in th e calculation s fo r th e propose drule , Hydr

o System s wa s given emissio n reductio n credit

fo r it s carbon filte

r syste mi n the manua

l toolin g andtoolin g gelcoa t proces s groups . Durin g ou

r revie w ofth e assumption s in the MACT floo r determination s an dcos tP. 4



### calculations , w e reviewedthe trip repor t t o Hydr o System s an

ddeterminedtha

t the reductio n credit wa s not appropriat e becaus e ther

e i s no wa y to calculat

e the reductio n bein g achieved ; s o w e remove dth e reductio n credit . ABOVE-THE-FLOO RCOSTIN G Permanen

tTota l Enclosures Exhaus tAi rFlo

w Calculations Th e amoun t o f exhaus t ai r flo w calculatedfro

mPTE s ar e basedon tw o differen

t methodologies . On

e methodology calculate s the exhaus t ai r flo w b y firs t sizin g th e PTE s an

d then calculatin g th e exhaus t ai r flo w tha t meet s the ND O an

dminimu mai r velocit y criteri a foun din Metho d204 . Th

e secon dmethodology "back

calculates " the exhaus t

ai r flow rat e neede dt o achiev e aspecifiedmaximu mconcentratio n in th e ai

r stream . The large

r ofth e tw o calculate dexhaus t

ai r flo w rate s i s then selectedt

o siz e an dcos t the add-on contro l devices . Changes , a s discussedbelow , wer e mad e t o bot h o f thes e tw o exhaus t

ai r flow calculatio n methodologies . Natura l Draf tOpenings . A s indicatedi n the proposa

l BID , the siz e ofth e natura l draf t opening s (NDOs ) i n permanen t tota l enclosure s (PTEs ) fo

r operation s othe

r tha n continuou s laminatio n an

dcasting wer

e calculate da s 0. 2 percen

t ofth e tota l surface are afo

r th e PTE ; fo

r continuou s laminatio n an

dcasting , NDO s wer

e calculate da s 2 percen

t ofth e tota

l surfac e area . EPA' s five-point

criteri afo r tota l enclosure s allow s opening s u p t o 5 percent

ofth e tota

l surfac e area , but w e foun dtha t reinforcedplastic s facilitie s typically hav e muc h lowe r percentages . Afte r carefu l consideration , w e determinedtha t NDO s o f 0. 2 percent

ar e probably not sufficient . Th

e costing calculation s wer

e revise ds o tha

t the NDO s ar

e calculate da s 2 percent

o f the tota l surfac e are afo

r all processe s (thu s no chang e fo r continuou s laminatio n an

dcasting) . Bac k Calculation an

d Maximu

m Concentration . Th

e bac k calculatio n methodology uses , in part , atarget

maximu mconcentratio n to calculat e the exhaus t

ai r flo w rate . I

n th e proposa l cos t calculations , we usedamaximu mexhaus t concentratio n o

f 10 0 ppmHAP . Severa

l commenter s indicatedtha

t 10 0 ppmwa s to o high . W

e reviewedthe availabl e dataan dth e publi c comment s an

dconcludedtha

t we ha dincorrectly characterize dthe exhaus t concentration , which -3 -P. 5

shoul dhav e bee n somewha t les s tha n 5 0 ppm . Base do n thi s finding , w e revise dth e cos t algorithm s t o calculat e contro l cost s base do n a"target " maximu mexhaus t concentratio n o f

5 0 pp m(a s styrene) . Thi s targe t concentratio n matche s th e voluntar y worke r exposur e limi t

tha t man y facilitie s hav e committe dnot t o exceed . PT E Sizin g Severa l commenter s expresse dconcern s tha t th e PT E sizin g algorithm s i n ou r cos t analysi s unde r

estimate dth e siz e o f

PTE s tha t

wo.uldb e require dat

thei r facilities . W e compare dth e facility-specifi c PT E siz e dat afro mal l facilitie s tha t submitte ddat aagains t

th e PT E size s predictin g b y ou r algorithms , whic h ar e drive n b y resi n us e an dhour s o f operation . Althoug h th e compariso n showe dsignifican t difference s a

t certai n individua l facilities , th e averag e siz e predicte db y ou r algorithm s was th e sam e a s th e averag e ofth e facility specifi c dat a submitte dove r

alarg e portio n ofth e siz e range . (Se e Attachmen t A. ) Obtainin g facility-specifi c dat afor al l facilitie s i n th e databas e woul db e an impossibl e task . W e conclude dtha t ou r algorith mi s an acceptabl e predicto r o f PT E size ; therefore , w e di dno t chang e th e PT E sizin g algorith mi n th e cos t

analysis . (Not e tha t

th e calculate dPT E siz e for individua l facilitie s migh t hav e change dsinc e proposal . Tha t i s th e resul t

o f update dresi n us e an dhour s o f operation , not

a chang e i n th e calculatio n methodology.) Annualizatio n o f

PT E Cost s A s note di n th e proposa l BID , PTE s wer e annualize do n a30-year basis . Severa l commenter s suggeste dtha t 3 0 year s i s not

areasonabl e "life " expectanc y for PTE s use di n th e industry . W e revisite dth e lif e expectanc y o f

PTE s an dconclude dtha t 3 0 year s i s indee dlonge r tha n on e woul dreasonabl y expec t aPT E t o last . Therefore , w e change dth e lif e expectanc y for PTE s i n th e revise dcos t

calculation s t o 1 0 years . CF A suggeste dtha t

w e chang e th e interes t

rat e from7 % t o 10% . Base do n feedbac k fro mEPA' s economic s group , ou r origina l assumptio n o f

7 % interes t

i s reasonable ; therefore , w e di dno t

chang e th e interes t

rat e i n th e revise dcos t

analysis .

-4 -P. 6

Duct , Elbow s & T's , an d Dampe rSizin g an d Contro l Devic e Costin g Th e algorithm s use dt o siz e ducts , elbow s an dT's , an ddamper s an dt o calculat e th e cos t o f contro l device s ar e onl y vali di n specifi c range s (diameter s for ducts , elbow s an dT's , an d dampers , an dai r

flo w rate s for

contro l devices) . Wher e th e algorithm s estimat e diameter s o r ai r flo w rate s for

thes e equipmen t

that ar e outsid e ofth e vali drange , th e cos t equation s hav e t o b e manuall y adjuste ds o tha t additiona l piece s o f

equipmen t

withi n th e vali drang e ar e used . Fo r example , ifth e estimate dai r flo w rat e exceede dth e uppe r range , multipl e contro l device s instea d o f on e wer e coste dt o kee p th e ai r flo w rat e t o eac h contro l devic e at o r belo w th e uppe r

range . A fe w o f thes e manua l update s wer e misse di n th e cos t calculation s supportin g th e propose d rule . In th e revise dcos t

analysis , al l ofth e equation s wer e reviewe dan dmanuall y adjuste da s neede dt o kee p withi n th e specifie dranges . Utilitie s Fa n Powe r I n th e cos t

analysi s for

th e propose drule , w e calculate dth e electrica l powe r consumptio n for rotary concentrator s base do n flow rate s t o th e contro l devic e usin g afa n powe r equatio n develope db y RTI . Tha t

equatio n was base do n vendo r quote s fromDurr

Environmental , Inc . Accordin g t o th e Dur

r representative (Jame s Stone) , thei r rotar y concentrato r

system s withou t prefiltratio n hav e apressur e dro p fro msi x t o eigh t inche s an dacombine dfa n an dmoto r efficienc y betwee n 6 5 an d8 0 percent . (Se e Contac t Report , Attachmen t

B. ) A s an alternative , CF A suggeste dth e fa n powe r equatio n i n th e OAQP S cos t manua l usin g apressur e dro p o f

1 6 inche s an dcombine dfa n an dmoto r

efficienc y o f

6 0 percent . Thi s approac h resulte di n electrica l consumptio n tha t i s abou t 4 time s highe r

tha n th e RT I approac h at th e uppe r flo w rang e with les s differenc e a t lowe r flows . W e als o looke dat othe r pressur e drop s reported , an dth e value' s reporte db y Dur r seeme dlo w i n comparison . Therefore , w e conclude d tha t th e pressur e drop s may hav e bee n underestimate di n th e proposa l cos t calculations . W e change dth e equatio n t o reflec t a1 6 inc h pressur e dro p acros s th e entir e syste man dacombine d fa n an moto r

efficienc y o f

60%> , a s suggeste db y CFA . Th e revise dcos t analysi s reflect s thi s change.
-5 -P. 7

Fue l Consumptio n CF A als o suggeste dusin g th e OAQP S fuel consumptio n equatio n instea dofth e RT I equatio n base do n vendo r dat atha t w e used . W e considere dCFA' s suggestio n an ddiscusse dth e dat awit h th e vendo r

(Jame s Ston e fro mDur

r Environmental , Inc) . Base do n ou r revie w ofth e data , w e conclude dtha t

th e RT I equatio n w e use dat proposa l i s appropriat e an dw e di dno t mak e th e suggeste dchange . Utilit v Cost s Severa l commenter s expresse dconcern s tha t utilit y cost s i n th e analysi s ar e to o high . W e assume dan electricit y cos t o f $0.0448/kW h an danatura l ga s cos t o f $3.24/100 0 scfm . Thes e cost s ar e base do n nationa l average s reporte db y th e Departmen t ofEnergy . W e believ e tha t thes e cost s represen t

th e bes t availabl e dat aan ddi dno t chang e th e utilit y cost s i n th e revise d analysis . Othe r Hour s o f

Operation I n th e cos t

calculation s supportin g th e propose drule , w e assume dtha t al l RF P facilitie s operat e 600 0 hour s pe r

year . W e receive dnumerou s comment s o n thi s assumptio n an dman y commenter s indicate dtha t the y d o not

operat e tha t

man y hours . W e obtaine dfacility-specifi c operatin g hour s for

man y ofth e large r

facilitie s throug h commen t letter s an dthroug h afacility surve y conducte db y CFA . Thes e facility-specifi c hour s wer e use dwhereve r the y ar e available . (Se e Tabl e 3 for

alis t ofth e facility-specifi c hour s use di n th e cos t analysis. ) Whe n facility
specifi c dat awer e not

available , w e assume d200 0 hour s pe r year , roughl y equivalen t t o on e shif t pe r day . Base do n th e comment s an drevise ddat aw e received , w e believ e 200 0 hour s pe r year i s abette r

representatio n o f

actua l practic e i n th e reinforce dplastic s industry . Mixin g Cost s Complianc e cost s for

mixin g operation s ar e drive n b y th e nee dt o cove r mixers . I n th e cos t calculations , th e numbe r o f mixers , an dthu s th e numbe r o f require dmixe r

covers , i s estimate dfo r

eac h facility basedo n th e amoun t o f materia l use dannuall y ifth e actua l numbe r o fP. 8

mixer s wa s no t

availabl e for

aparticular

facility . Add-o n contro l cost s ar e als o impacte db y th e amoun t o f materia l use dbecaus e PT E cost s ar e calculate do n th e throughput . Ou r revie w ofth e cos t calculation s identifie dsevera l instance s wher e mixin g cost s di dnot accuratel y reflec t

al l o f th e proces s group s fo

r eac h facilit

y becaus e th e materia l usag e for certai n processe s wa s not adde dt o th e facility total . Fo r th e revise dcosts , w e reviewe dal l processe s a t th e eac h facility an dupdate dth e mixin g calculation s s o tha t al l processe s wer e include di n th e facility total . Material s use dfor

tooling , whic h wer e no t

previousl y included , wer e als o adde dt o th e facility materia l usag e totals . Althoug h th e assumption s for mixin g cost s di dno t

change , th e actua l cost s for controllin g mixin g operation s di dchang e a s aresul t ofth e correction s an dupdate s t o th e facility materia l usage . Cost s fo rFacilitie s with Existin g Contro l Device s Th e cost s fo

r th e above-the-floo r

optio n for

source s with existin g contro l device s wer e revisite ddurin g th e costin g calculatio n revisions . Th e source s wit h existin g contro l device s wer e identifie dan ddivide dint o tw o groups : thos e with contro l device s achievin g at leas t 95 % destructio n efficienc y an dthos e achievin g les s tha n 95 % destructio n efficiency . Fo r facilitie s with contro l device s achievin g les s tha n 95 % efficiency , w e assume dtha t th e facility woul drequir e ane w contro l devic e a s wel l a s ne w PTE s an dductwork for al l proces s group s becaus e th e existin g devic e migh t no t hav e th e capacity t o achiev e 95 % contro l o f thes e processe s throug h modifications . Th e ne w contro l devic e was coste dusin g th e sam e assumption s tha t

are use dfor

facilitie s withou t

an y existin g add-o n control , bu t th e operatin g cost s wer e modified . Fo r facilitie s with existin g controls , w e first calculate dth e operatin g cost s basedo n th e siz e an defficienc y ofth e existin g contro l device . Nex t w e calculate dth e operatin g cost s for th e replacemen t

contro l device . Finally , w e subtracte dth e curren t operatin g cost s from th e predicte dfuture operatin g cost s s o tha t th e actua l cost s use di n th e analysi s reflec t th e ne t increas e i n operatin g costs . Thi s represent s achang e fromth e previou s cos t calculation s wher e n o adjustment s t o th e costin g wer e mad e for facilitie s with contro l device s les s tha n 90% ) efficiency . Th e cost s for

thos e facilitie s wa s calculate dth e sam e a s the y wer e for facilitie sP. 9



### without contro l devices . W

e believ e thi s chang e accuratel y reflect s the incrementa

l cos t of installin g an

doperatin g a

n add-on contro l devic e achieving a t leas t 95 % captur

e andcontrol . Fo r facilitie s wit

h contro l device s achieving a t leas t 95 % efficiency , w e assume dtha t a ne w contro l devic e wouldb e neededfo r th e processe s tha

t ar e currently uncontrolle dbecaus e th e existin g contro l devic e migh t not hav e th e capacit

y t o accommodat

e ai r flow s fo r additiona l processes . The contro l devic e sizin g algorithm s wer e modifiedfo

r thes e facilitie s s o tha

t th e contro l devic e i s sizedon airflow fro mthe currently uncontrolle dprocesse s only , rathe r tha n the airflo w fromall processes , a s w e di dfo r facilitie s without

contro l devices . Thi s represent s a chang e fromthe previou s cos t analysi s wher

e w e didnot

cos t acontro l devic e or

PTE s fo r facilitie s wit

h a95 % efficien

t device . W

e believ e thi s chang e account s fo r th e cost s tha

t facilitie s ma

y incu r i f their existin g control s cannot

handl e additiona

l processes . Correction o

f Error s in Origina

l CostCalculations Whil e updatin g th e costing calculations , anumbe r o f error s wer e foun di n th e spreadshee t tha t wer e correcte din the revise dcalculations . A s aresult of thes e changes , som

e of th e specific cos t

value s ma y hav e changedeve

n though the

y ar e not relate dt o an

y ofth e change s i n assumption s o

r facilit y data . Fo r facilitie s wit

h existin g contro l devices , the "uncontrolle demissions " wer e calculate d a s emission s afte

r control . Th

e algorithm s fo

r thos e facilitie s wer

e correcte ds o tha

t "uncontrolle demissions " reflect s the level o f emission s tha

t wouldoccu

r withou t th e us e ofth e contro l device . I n som e cases , the cost s fo

r PTE s wer e calculate dincorrectl

y becaus e wal l andceilin g size s wer e calculate dincorrectly . Thi s wa s the result o f incorrec t cell reference s to th e assume d height , width , an

dlengt h ofth e require dPTEs .

-8 -Tabl e 1 . Facilit y Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Appalachia n Plastic s Proces s Grou p

manua l non-C R
mechanica l C R

mechamca l non-C R Chang e Descriptio n adde dth e facility t o thi s proces s grou p change dresi n us e change dHA P conten t adde dflowcoater s fo

r a portio n o f operatio n
remove dflowcoater s fro m thi s proces s grou p change dresi n us e change dHA P conten t Ne w Valu e

97. 9 tp y 40.6%

2 3 tp y 36.4 % Ol d

Valu e

56. 6 tp y 39.3 %

2 0 tp y 38.7 % Sourc e

Tri p report ; E-mai l tabl e fro m K . Barnet t

t o K . Meardo n Attachmen t

C Tri p report ; E-mai l tabl e from K . Barnet t

t o K . Meardo n Attachmen t

C Tri p report ; E-mai l tabl e from K . Barnet t

t o K . Meardo n Attachmen t

C Tri p report ; E-mai l tabl e fro m K . Barnet t

t o K . Meardo n Attachmen t

C Tri p report ; E-mai l tabl e from K . Barnet t

t o K . Meardo n Attachmen t

C Tri p report ; E-mai l tabl e from K . Barnet t

t o K . Meardo n Attachmen t

C Tri p report ; E-mai l tabl e from K . Barnet t

t o K . Meardo n Attachmen t

C

### Tabl e 1 . Facility Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Appalachia n Plastic s

Aqu aGlas s Adamsvill e Proces s Grou p

filament windin g non C R

filamen t windin g C R

mechanica l non-C R fille d gelcoa t - pigmente d Chang e Descriptio n

change dresi n us e change dHA P conten t change dresi n us e change dHA P conten t
adde dflowcoater s change dresi n us e change dgelcoa t

us e Ne w

Valu e 13 9 tp y 30.8 %
2 9 tp y 40.9 %

902 7 tp y 104 1 tp y Ol d

Valu e 150tp y 31.0 %
3 6 tp y 53.8 %

1014 3 tp y 117 0 tp y Sourc e

Tri p report ; E-mai l tabl e fro m K . Barnet t

t o K . Meardo n Attachmen t

C Tri p report ; E-mai l tabl e fro m K . Barnet t

t o K . Meardo n Attachmen t

C Tri p report ; E-mai l tabl e fro m K . Barnet t

t o K . Meardo n Attachmen t

C Tri p report ; E-mai l tabl e fro m K . Barnet t

t o K . Meardo n Attachmen t

C Docke t No . A-94-52 , IV-D-7 1 derive dfro memission s dat ai n lette r fro mAqu aGlass , 10/1/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-7 1 derive dfromemission s dat ai n lette r fro mAqu aGlass , 10/1/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-7 1



### -10
-

### Tabl e 1 . Facility Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Aqu aGlas s Klamat h Fall s

AR E Massillo n Proces s Grou p

mechanica l non-C R filled

gelcoa t - pigmente d
mechanica l non-C R fille d Chang e Descriptio n change dreinforcemen t

us e change dfiller

us e change dHA P conten t change dresi n us e change dge l coa t

us e change dresi n us e change dreinforcemen t

us e Ne w

Valu e 90 4 tp y 187 0 tp y 30 % 1746. 8 tp y 37 5 tp y 1267. 9 tp y 477. 3 tp y Ol d

Valu e 507. 1 tp y 1062. 4 tp y 42.6 % 992. 5 tp y 21 3 tp y 5983. 5 tp y 1002. 5 tp y Sourc e

update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o chang e base do n ol drati o derive dfro memission s dat ai n lette r fromAqu aGlass , 10/1/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-7 1 derive dfro memission s dat ai n lette r fromAqu aGlass , 10/1/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-7 1 E-mai l fro mC . Taylo r

t o K . Barnet t 1/30/0 5 Attachmen t

D update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o



### -11
-

### Tabl e 1 . Facility Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y

AR E Massillo n
AREMt . Eato n Proces s Grou p

gelcoa t - pigmente d
toolin g gelcoa t mechanica l non-C R filled

gelcoa t - pigmente d Chang e Descriptio n

change dfiller

us e change dgelcoa t

us e

remove dcontro l change dresi n us e change dreinforcemen t

us e change dfiller

us e adde dcontro l change dgelcoa t

us e Ne w

Valu e 400. 6 tp y 458.8 6 tp y 0 % 102. 6 tp y 102. 8 tp y 32. 3 tp y 95 % 78.9 4 tp y Ol d

Valu e 6408. 8 tp y 157 2 tp y 95 % 1007. 1 tp y 514. 6 tp y 1078. 1 tp y 0 26 7 tp y Sourc e

E-mai l fro mC . Taylo r

t o K . Barnet t 1/30/0 5 Attachmen t

D E-mai l fro mC . Taylo r

t o K . Barnet t 1/30/0 5 Attachmen t

D E-mai l fro mC . Taylo r

t o K . Barnet t 1/30/0 5 Attachmen t

D update dt o b e consisten t wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o E-mai l fro mC . Taylo r

t o K . Barnet t 1/30/0 5 Attachmen t

D Docke t A-94-52 , II-B-2 6 E-mai l fro mC . Taylo r

t o K . Barnet t 1/30/0 5 Attachmen t

D


### -12
-

### Tabl e 1 . Facility Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Breme n Glas s Bristo l Fiberlit e CD RSystem s Corp . (Corcoran , Waynoka , Palatk a facilities ) CD RSystem s Corp . Corcora n CD RSystem s Palatk a Cedar Manufacturin g Proces s Grou p

toolin g gelcoat
mechanica l non-C R unfille d

manua l non-C R

manua l non-C R

manua l non-C R
toolin g gelcoa t Chang e Descriptio n change dHA P conten t change dHA P conten t

move dfro mmechanica l non-C Runfille dt o manua l non-C Rproces s grou p (adde dresi n us e previousl y liste da s mechanica l t o existin g manua l resi n use ) change dHA P conten t change dHA P conten t change dHA P conten t Ne w Valu e 42 %
38 %

35 %
35 %
46.7 % Ol d

Valu e 39.9 %
28.2 %

33 %
36 %
44 % Sourc e

Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/8/0 2 Attachmen t

E Phon e cal l t o Ashlan d Chemica l fro mMadelin e Stru m 12/03/9 6 Attachmen t

F E-mai l fromJ . Schweitze r t o K . Barnet t

3/19/0 2 Attachmen t

G

E-mai l fro mJ . Schweitze r t o K . Barnet t

3/19/0 2 Attachmen t

G E-mai l fromJ . Schweitze r t o K . Barnet t

3/19/0 2 Attachmen t

G Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/8/0 2 Attachmen t

F

_—— 

### -13
-

### Tabl e 1 . Facility Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Contemporar y Product s Custo m Fiberglas s Moldin g Inc . GenCorp Grea t Lake s Plastic s Corp . Hydr o System s
Kohle r Brownwoo d Proces s Grou p

manua l non-C R
mechanica l non-C R unfille d SM C
mechanica l non-C R unfille d

manua l toolin g toolin g gelcoa t mechanica l non-C R Chang e Descriptio n
move dfrommechanica l non-C Runfille dt o manua l non-C Rproces s grou p remove dcredi t

for flo w coater s
remove dfacility fro m calculatio n - facility ha s close d adde dcredi t

fo r flowcoater s fo r 2/ 3 rd s ofth e resi n us e
remove dcredi t

for carbo n filter syste m remove dcredi t

for carbo n filter syste m change dHA P conten t Ne w Valu e

10. 3

200. 7 lb/to n (UEF )

45.1 % Ol d

Valu e

6. 4

35 4 lb/to n (UEF )

40 % Sourc e

E-mai l fromJ . Schweitze r t o K . Barnet t

3/19/0 2 Attachmen t

G E-mai l fromJ . Schweitze r t o K . Barnet t

3/19/0 2 Attachmen t

G L . Lasher' s researc h
Lette r fro mJ . Laux , 2/8/0 0 Attachmen t

H Se e Tri p Repor t

t o Hydr o Systems . N o wa y t o calculat e emissio n credit . Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/10/0 2 Attachmen t

I



### -14
-

•* •Tabl e 1 . Facilit y Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Kohle r Brownwoo d

Monarc h Plasti c Inc . Nordi c Fiberglas s (Warren ) Plasti c Developmen t Co . Proces s Grou p

mechanica l non-C R

pigmente dge l coa t

manua l non-C R

mechanica l non-C R

mechamca l non-C R Chang e Descriptio n change dresi n us e
adde dflowcoater s

change dgelcoa t

us e

remove dvacuu mbaggin g credi t change dHA P conten t

adde dflowcoater s Ne w Valu e 155 6 tp y

1 6 tp y 3. 3

38.5 %

12 4 lb/to n (UEF ) Ol d

Valu e 55 0 tp y

1 0 tp y 1. 9

48.5 %

35 4 lb/to n (UEF ) Sourc e

Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/10/0 2 Attachmen t

I Lette r fro mM . Cassid y 9/25/0 1 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-37 ; Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/10/0 2 Attachmen t

I Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/10/0 2 Attachmen t

I Credi t wa s erroneousl y applie d fo r thi s particula r

facilit y - decisio n wa s mad e earl y o n no t t o giv e credi t Lette r fro mW . Spidahl , 2/13/0 0 Attachmen t

J (o r docke t no . whe n assigned ) Lette r fro mS . Allison , 2/15/0 0 Attachmen t

K (o r docke t no . whe n assigned ) •15
-Tabl e 1 . Facilit y Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Shenandoa h Fiberglas s Product s Tompkins
Lasc o Anahei m Proces s Grou p

manua l non-C R

mechanica l non-C R fille d

gelcoa t - pigmente d Chang e Descriptio n

remove dvacuumbaggin g credi t change dresi n us e change dHA P conten t change dfiller

us e change dreinforcemen t

us e change dge l coat

us e change dHA P conten t Ne w Valu e 0. 6

4010. 0 tp y 36 %
6254. 2 tp y 863. 1 tp y 91 3 tp y 36 % Ol d

Valu e 0. 4

313 6 tp y 47.7 %
489 1 tp y 67 5 tp y 761tp y 36.4 % Sourc e

Credi t wa s erroneousl y applie d fo r thi s particula r

facilit y - decisio n wa s mad e earl y o n no t t o giv e credi t derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L •16
-

### Tabl e 1 . Facilit y Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e Compan y Tompkins
Lasc o Cordel e Tompkins
Lasc o Cordel e

Tompkins
Lasc o Elizabethtown ' Proces s Grou p

mechanica l non-C R filled mechanica l non-C R filled

gelcoa t - pigmente d

mechanica l non-C R fille d Chang e Descriptio n change dresi n us e change dHA P conten t change dfiller

us e change dreinforcemen t

us e change dge l coa t

us e change dHA P conten t change dresi n us e Ne w Valu e 285 6 tp y 38. 7 %
4466. 7 tp y 599. 5 tp y 72 5 tp y 36 %
2532. 7 tp y Ol d

Valu e 197 7 tp y 47. 8 %
309 2 tp y 41 5 tp y 47 0 tp y 36.4 %
212 5 tp y Sourc e

derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l ratio derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L | 

### -17
-

### Tabl e 1 . Facility Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Tompkins
Lasc o Elizabethtow n Proces s Grou p

mechanica l non-C R filled mechanica l non-C R filled

gelcoa t - pigmente d Chang e Descriptio n

change dHA P conten t change dfille r

us e change dreinforcemen t

us e change dcontro l leve l change dge l coa t

us e change dHA P conten t change dcontro l % Ne w Valu e 38.7 %
3939. 0 tp y 780. 7 tp y 51.51 %
642. 9 tp y 36 %
77.6 % Ol d

Valu e 47.7 %
330 5 tp y 65 5 tp y 47.5 %
54 1 tp y 36.4 %
47.5 % Sourc e

derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L 

### -18
-Tabl e 1 . Facilit y Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Tompkins
Lasc o Lancaste r Tompkins
Lasc o Lancaste r Proces s Grou p

mechanica l non-C R fille d mechanica l non-C R fille d

gelcoa t - pigmente d Chang e Descriptio n

change dresi n us e change dHA P conten t change dfiller

us e change dreinforcemen t

us e change dcontro l leve l change dge l coa t

us e change dHA P conten t Ne w Valu e 2910. 0 tp y 38.7 %
4592. 3 tp y 458. 6 tp y 37.83 %
712. 1 tp y
36 % Ol d

Valu e 225 9 tp y 47.7 %
356 5 tp y 35 6 tp y 43.5 %
55 6 tp y
36.4 % Sourc e

derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L -19
-

•* • h oTabl e 1 . Facilit y Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Tompkins
Lasc o Lancaste r Tompkins
Lasc o Moap a Proces s Grou p

gelcoa t - pigmente d
mechanica l non-C R fille d Chang e Descriptio n change dcontro l % change dreinforcemen t

us e change dfiller

us e change dcontro l leve l change dHA P conten t change dresi n us e

remove dfacility fro mfloo r calculatio n Ne w Valu e 77.6 %
1929. 0 tp y 4778. 8 tp y 92.2 %
36 %
3038. 2 tp y Ol d

Valu e 47.5 %
397 4 tp y 984 5 tp y N o contro l 47 % . 625 9 tp y Sourc e

derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L Polic y decisio n tha t

operation s a t thi s facility coul dno t

b e universall y applicabl e

### Tabl e 1 . Facility Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Tompkins
Lasc o Moap a Tompkins
Lasc o Moap a

Tompkins
Lasc o South Bosto n Proces s Grou p

gelcoa t - pigmente d gelcoa t - pigmente d

mechanica l non-C R fille d Chang e Descriptio n change dge l coa t

us e change dHA P conten t change dcontro l %

remove dfacility fro mfloo r calculatio n change dresi n us e change dHA P conten t change dfille r

us e Ne w

Valu e 683. 7 tp y 36 %
92.2 %

3171. 5 tp y 37.7 %
4662. 1 tp y Ol d

Valu e 159 6 tp y 36.4 %
0 %

277 1 tp y 48.1 %
407 9 tp y Sourc e

derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L Polic y decisio n tha t

operation s a t thi s facilit y coul dno t

b e universall y applicabl e derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o 

### -21
-

### Tabl e 1 . Facility Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Tompkins
Lasc o South Bosto n

Tompkins
Lasc o Thre e River s Proces s Grou p

mechanica l non-C R filled
gelcoa t - pigmente d

mechanica l non-C R filled Chang e Descriptio n change dreinforcemen t

us e change dcontro l leve l change dHA P conten t change dcontro l % change dge l coat

us e change dfiller

us e change dresi n us e Ne w Valu e 824. 6 tp y 20.08 %
36 %
77.6 %
521. 1
4434. 1 tp y 2845. 2 tp y Ol d

Valu e 70 9 tp y 30.2 %
36.4 %
47.5 %
47 9 tp y 438 7 tp y 281 5 tp y Sourc e

update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L update dt o b e consisten t

with ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L
-22 -Tabl e 1 . Facility Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Tompkins
Lasc o Thre e River s Tompkins
Lasc o Thre e River s

Tompkins
Lasc o Yel m Proces s Grou p

mechamca l non-C R filled mechanica l non-C R fille d gelcoa t - pigmente d

mechanica l non-C R filled Chang e Descriptio n change dHA P conten t change dreinforcemen t

us e change dHA P conten t change dge l coat

us e change dresi n us e change dHA P conten t change dfiller

us e Ne w

Valu e 38.7 % 59 0 tp y 36 %
71 8 tp y 2928. 6 tp y 36 %
4483. 3 tp y Ol d

Valu e 47.8 %
58 4 tp y 36.4 %
68 5 tp y 275 4 tp y 30 %
421 6 tp y Sourc e

derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o -23 -

### Tabl e 1 . Facility Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Tompkins
Lasc o Yel m Tompkins
Lasc o Yel m

Venetia n Marbl e Proces s Grou p

mechanica l non-C R fille d mechamca l non-C R fille d gelcoa t - pigmente d

gelcoa t - clear polyme r castin g Chang e Descriptio n

change dreinforcemen t

us e change dcontro l leve l change dHA P conten t change dcontro l % change dge l coa t

us e change dgelcoa t

us e change dresi n us e Ne w Valu e 611. 5 tp y 14.79 %
36 %
77.6 %
54 8 tp y 42. 3 tp y 54 0 tp y Ol d

Valu e 57 5 tp y

n o contro l 36.4 %
0 %
603. 7 tp y <ltp y <ltp y Sourc e

update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfromLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfro mspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L derive dfromspreadshee t receive dfro mLasco , 02/13/0 2 Attachmen t

L base do n recen t

dat aavailabl e i n th e TR I databas e base do n recen t

dat aavailabl e i n th e TR I databas e

-24 -

### Tabl e 1 . Facility Specifi c Change s t o RF P Databas e

Compan y Xerxe s Anaheim Xerxe s Segui n Al l Facilitie s Proces s Grou p

mechanica l C R
mechanica l C R
Al l proces s group s Chang e Descriptio n change dresi n us e t o ge t emission s equa l t o commen t lette r change dresi n us e t o ge t emission s equa l t o commen t lette r Ne w

Valu e 35 4 tp y 52 0 tp y Ol d

Valu e 94. 7 tp y 94. 7 tp y Sourc e

derive dfro mcommen t

lette r Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1 derive dfromcommen t

lette r Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1 th e average ratio s use dt o estimat e reinforcemen t an dfiller

us e wher e dat aar e no t availabl e wer e recalculate dusin g th e mos t u p t o dat e resi n information . Th e rati o calculatio n wa s als o modifie dt o calculat e astraigh t facility averag e rati o instea do f a weighte daverag e base do n tota l resi n us e



### -25
-

• oTabl e 2 : Facilitie s Adde d t o th e RF P Databas e

Compan y Abl e Body
Shifferdecke r Abl e Body
7 t hStree t Alaglas s Pool s
Aqu aGlas s - McEwa n AR E Massillo n

AREMt . Eato n AREMt . Eato n Proces s Grou p

mechanica l non-C R mechanica l non-C R mechanica l C R pigmente dgelcoa t mechanica l non-C R mechanica l non-C R unfille d

mechanica l non-C R unfille d mechanica l non-C R unfille d Chang e Descriptio n adde dt o proces s grp - resi n us e adde dt o proces s gr p - resi n us e adde dfacility w /

non atomization , 37.7% o HA P adde dfacilit y wit h 37 % HA P adde dt o proces s grou p adde dresi n us e estimate dreinforcemen t

us e adde dresi n us e
estimate dreinforcemen t

us e Ne w Valu e 75 0 tp y 72 0 tp y

1071tp y 477. 3 tp y 16 0 tp y
102. 8 tp y Sourc e

Lette r fromK . Witt , 9/27/0 1 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-5 0 Lette r fromK . Witt , 9/27/0 1 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV- D Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e Attachmen t

M Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e Attachmen t

M Lette r fromAqu aGlass , 10/1/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-7 1 E-mai l fromC . Taylo r

t o K . Barnet t 1/30/0 2 Attachmen t

D update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o E-mai l fromC . Taylo r

t o K . Barnet t 1/30/0 2 Attachmen t

D update dt o b e consisten t

wit h ne w resi n us e base do n th e origina l rati o -26
-Tabl e 2 : Facilitie s Adde d t o th e RF P Databas e

Compan y Emsi g Fabwel l

Kohle r (Spartanburg ) Proces s Grou p

Centrifugal castin g non C R mechanica l non-C R unfille d

pigmente dgelcoa t

mechanica l non-C R Chang e Descriptio n
remove dfrom database/floo r

cal c - facility close dFe b 200 2 adde dresi n us e HA P conten t FI T HA P conten t

(wt . average ) adde dge l coa t

us e resi n us e HA P conten t non-atomizatio n Ne w Valu e

2651.7 1 tp y 27.1 %

29.6 % 1288.7 1 tp y 309 5 tp y 38.4 % (ave ) Sourc e

Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/08/0 2 Attachmen t

N Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/08/0 2 Attachmen t

N Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/08/0 2 Attachmen t

N Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/08/0 2 Attachmen t

N Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/08/0 2 Attachmen t

N Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/10/0 2 Attachmen t

O Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/10/0 2 Attachmen t

O Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/10/0 2 Attachmen t

O
-27 -

### Tabl e 2 : Facilitie s Adde dt o th e RF P Databas e

Compan y Kohle r (Spartanburg )

MFG-N C

MF G - Kansa s

MF G - Texa s Proces s Grou p

mechanica l toolin g
pigmente dgelcoa t

mechanica l non-C R compression /

injectio n moldin g mechanica l non-C R compression /

injectio n moldin g mechanica l non-C R compression /

injectio n moldin g Chang e Descriptio n resi n us e HA P conten t gelcoa t us e HA P conten t adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p Ne w Valu e 1. 7 tp y 47 % 60 0 tp y 37.45 % (ave ) Sourc e

Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/10/0 2 Attachmen t

O Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/10/0 2 Attachmen t

O Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/10/0 2 Attachmen t

O Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e 4/10/0 2 Attachmen t

O Lette r fro mP . Bennett , 10/25/0 1 Docke t #A-94-5 2 IV-D-9 4 Lette r fro mP . Bennett , 10/25/0 1 Docke t #A-94-5 2 IV-D-9 4 Lette r fromP . Bennett , 10/25/0 1 Docke t #A-94-5 2 IV-D-9 4 Lette r fromP . Bennett , 10/25/0 1 Docke t #A-94-5 2 IV-D-9 4 Lette r fro mP . Bennett , 10/25/0 1 Docke t #A-94-5 2 IV-D-9 4 Lette r fromP . Bennett , 10/25/0 1 Docke t #A-94-5 2 IV-D-9 4 -28 -

### Tabl e 2 : Facilitie s Adde dt o th e RF P Databas e

Compan y Monac o Coac h (Elkhart ) Xerxes / Profor m- - W . Memphi s Proces s Grou p

mechanica l non-C R unfille d manua l C R
manua l non-C R
manua l toolin g mechanica l C R mechanica l non-C R mechanica l toolin g toolin g gelcoa t Chang e Descriptio n adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p adde dt o proces s grou p Ne w Valu e Sourc e

Lette r fromK . Anderson , 9/28/0 1 Docke t No . A-94-52 , IV-D-6 1 Lette r fro mC . Peterson , 10/29/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1 Lette r fromC . Peterson , 10/29/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1 Lette r fromC . Peterson , 10/29/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1 Lette r fromC . Peterson , 10/29/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1 Lette r fromC . Peterson , 10/29/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1 Lette r fromC . Peterson , 10/29/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1 Lette r fromC . Peterson , 10/29/0 2 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1



### -29
-

### Tabl e 3 : Revise dHour s o f Operatio n fo r

Specifi c Facilitie s Facilit y Nam e A . R . E. , Inc . (Moun t Eaton ) A . R . E. , Inc . (Massillon ) Abl e Bod y (Sevent h Street ) Abl e Bod y (Schifferdecker ) AKE R Plastic s Co. , Inc . (Plymouth , N Oa k Rd ) AKE R Plastic s Co. , Inc . (Martinsburg ) America n Standar d Aqu a Glas s Corp . (Klamat h Falls ) Aqu a Glas s Corp . (Adamsville ) Aqu a Glas s (McEwan ) Aqu a Bat h Co. , Inc . Attba rPlastics , Inc . Fibercas t Co . Fleetwoo d (Decatu r- formerl y Gol d Shield ) Fleetwood (Fontan a - formerl y Gol d Shield ) Hour s pe r Yea r 610 0 610 0 400 0 400 0 600 0 610 0 600 0 400 0 711 5 600 0 175 0 200 0 300 0 300 0 202 5 Basi s

Base d o n sit e visit . Base d o n sit e visit . Lette rfro m K . Witt , Abl e Bod y Corporation , 9/27/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-5 0 Lette rfro m K . Witt , Abl e Bod y Corporation , 9/27/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-5 0 Base d o n sit e visit . Base d o n sit e visit . Base d o n sit e visit . Lette rfro m Aqu a Glas s Corporation , 10/1/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-7 1 Lette rfro m Aqu a Glas s Corporation , 10/1/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV- D Lette rfro m Aqu a Glas s Corporation , 10/1/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV- D Annua l Hour s estimate d base d o n dat a obtaine d fro m CF A surve y (1/18/02) . Se e Attachmen t P . Annua l Hour s estimate d base d o n dat a obtaine d fro m CF A surve y (1/18/02) . Se e Attachmen t P . Annua l Hour s estimate d base d o n dat a obtaine d fro m CF A surve y (1/18/02) . Se e Attachmen t P . Lette rfro m M . Howard , Fleetwoo d Enterprises , 10/18/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-8 2 Annua l Hour s estimate d base d o n dat a obtaine d fro m CF A surve v(1/18/02) . Se e Attachmen t P . -30 -

V c o

### Tabl e 3 : Revise dHour s of Operatio n fo r

Specifi c Facilitie s Facilit y Nam e Holida y Ramble rCorp. , Plan t 3 6 &3 7 Lee rMidwes t MF G - Molde d Fibe rGlas s Co . (Unio n City ) Syntechnic s Tomkin s - LASC O Bathwar e (Lancaster ) Tomkin s - LASC O Bathwar e (Elizabet h Town ) Tomkin s - LASC O Bathwar e (Anaheim ) Tomkin s - LASC O Bathwar e (Moapa ) Tomkin s - LASC O Bathwar e (Yel m Tomkin s - LASC O Bathwar e (Sout h Boston ) Tomkin s - LASC O Bathwar e (Cordele ) Tomkin s - LASC O Bathwar e (Thre e Rivers ) Universal-Rundl e Corp . (Ottumwa ) Hour s pe r Yea r 212 5 200 0 720 0 210 0 624 0 636 0 660 0 660 0 600 0 416 0 624 0 660 0 212 5 Basi s

Annua l Hour s estimate d base d o n dat a obtaine d fro m CF A surve y (1/18/02) . Se e Attachmen t P . Annua l Hour s estimate d base d o n dat a obtaine d fro m CF A surve y (1/18/02) . Se e Attachmen t P . Lette rfro m P . Bennet , Molde d Fiberglas s Companies , 10/25/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-9 4 Annua l Hour s estimate d base d o n dat a obtaine d fro m CF A surve y (1/18/02) . Se e Attachmen t P . Lette rfro m G . Lowe , Lasc o Bathware , 9/28/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-5 8 Lette rfro m G . Lowe , Lasc o Bathware , 9/28/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-5 8 Lette rfro m G . Lowe , Lasc o Bathware , 9/28/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-5 8 Lette rfro m G . Lowe , Lasc o Bathware , 9/28/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-5 8 Lette rfro m G . Lowe , Lasc o Bathware , 9/28/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-5 8 Lette rfro m G . Lowe , Lasc o Bathware , 9/28/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-5 8 Lette rfro m G . Lowe , Lasc o Bathware , 9/28/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-5 8 Lette rfro m G . Lowe , Lasc o Bathware , 9/28/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-5 8 Annua l Hour s estimate d base d o n dat a obtaine d fro m CF A surve v(1/18/02) . Se e Attachmen t P . 

### -31
-

c o r- oTabl e 3 : Revise dHour s o f Operatio n fo r

Specifi c Facilitie s Facilit y Nam e Universal-Rundl e Corp . (Unio n Point ) Universal-Rundl e Corp . (Ne w Castle ) Xerxes/Profor m (W . Memphis ) Xerxe s Corp . (Seguin ) Xerxe s (Hagerstown ) Xerxe s Corp . (Anaheim ) Hour s pe r Yea r 237 5 200 0 400 0 400 0 400 0 400 0 Basi s

Annua l Hour s estimate d base d o n dat a obtaine d fro m CF A surve y (1/18/02) . Se e Attachmen t P . Annua l Hour s estimate d base d o n dat a obtaine d fro m CF A surve y (1/18/02) . Se e Attachmen t P . Lette rfro m C . Peterson , Xerxe s Corporation , 10/29/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1 Lette rfro m C . Peterson , Xerxe s Corporation , 10/29/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1 Lette rfro m C . Peterson , Xerxe s Corporation , 10/29/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1 Lette rfro m C . Peterson , Xerxe s Corporation , 10/29/01 . Docke t No . A-94-5 2 IV-D-11 1

-32 -

* • C O C OP.3 4



### ATTACHMEN

T A PT E Siz e Analysi s Pacific Environmenta

l Services , Inc . 1/8/0 3



# 3 3P.3 5



### MEMORANDU

M TO : RF

P Docke t FROM : Pacific Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) DATE : Januar y 15,200 3 SUBJECT : PT

E Siz e Analysi s Man y commenter s expressedconcer n tha t th e PT E sizin g algorithm s in th e proposa l cos t analysi s underestimate dth e size , an dtherefor e th e cost , o

f enclosures . Many commenter s provide ddetaile dinformation on dimension s of existin g enclosures , booths , or other operation s areas . W e use dthe facility-supplie ddimensio n datato calculat e tota l enclosure volume and compare dtha

t volum e to the tota

l enclsor e volum e calculate dfo

r eac h facilit y usin g ou

r origina l algorithms . W

e then calculate dthe percen t chang e in estimatedenclosur e volum e andplotte dit agains t facilit y resi n usage . Thi s wa s done fo r 1 7 facilities . A s shown in Tabl e 1 , the difference s between the PT E estimate s base don plant dat aand estimate s fromou

r origina l algorithm s ca

n b e quit e significan

t a t individua l facilities . However , th e averag e size s ar

e abou t the same , especially a

t lowe r resi n annua

l usages . For

fh e 1 5 facilitie s wit h tota l annua l resi n andge

l coa t usag e of les s tha n 5000 ton s pe

r year , ou r origina l algorithm s calculate da

n averag e PT

E volum e of 78,33 6 compare dt

o a n averag e PT

E volum e o f

77,29 7 usin g th e facility-supplie ddata . Furthermore , the origina l algorithm s overestimate dth e PT E siz e i n 1 0 out ofth e 1 7 case s fo

r which w e ha

ddatato consider . Basedo n thi s analysis , w e conclude dtha t th e origina

l algorithm s provid e reasonabl e estimate s fo

r PT E size s fo r the industr

y a s awhole .



# 3 ^P.3 6



### Table 1 Facility

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0 P Q Total Resi n +

Gelcoa tUs e (tpy ) 11,74 9 1,24 8 1,43 7 2,75 7 2,53 2 2,91 2 8,12 4 3,36 9 3,62 2 3,47 6 1,24 8 2,42 9 1,267 1,24 8 4,34 7 3,20 1 3,43 7 Total Volum e Usin g

Proposal Sizin g Algorithm s (Cubi c Feet) 169,72 0 71,39 2 93,35 2 79,87 2 79,87 2 79,87 2 186,09 6 88,51 2 88,51 2 88,51 2 74,59 2 79,87 2 68,83 2 71,39 2 77,29 6 77,29 6 55,86 4 Tota l Volum e Usin g

Facility Specifl c Data (cubi c Feet ) 478,18 0 337,00 0 35,12 4 23,94 0 21,72 6 57,87 0 405,00 0 128,01 6 39,24 0 33,04 0 45,69 6 53,20 8 39,72 8 153,57 6 99,43 2 25,87 2 65,98 4 Percen tChang e i n Siz e 182 % 372 % -62 % -70 % -73 % -28 % 118 % 45 % -56 % -63 % -39 % -33 % -42 % 115 % 29 % -67 % 18 %



# 3 51/15/200 3
Percen t Differenc e i n PT E Siz e fo r Facilit y Specifi c Dat a Compare d t o Origina l Estimate s 400 % 350 % 300 % 250 % E • § 200 % > U J
0 ) c « O 150 % 100 % 50 % 0 % -50 % -100 % •

•

• •

• 0 200 0 400 0

* • • •• ' 600 0 •

800 0 1000 0 •

1200 0 14 (

0 % = oriaina l estimat e Resi n Us e (tpy )
PTEchar tP.3 8



### ATTACHMEN

T B Contact Report : Jame s Stone , Dur

r Environmenta

l B y Melani e Proctor

5/11/0 1



# 3 7P.3 9



### Contac tRepor t From : Melani e Proctor , Pacific Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Date : Ma

y 11,200 1 Contact : Mr . Jame s Stone , Sale s Manage r r On-Sit e Program s Company : Dur

r Environmental , Inc . Telephone Number : (630 ) 587-996 0 Fa x Number : (630 ) 587-997 0 Contac tSummary : Mr . Ston e was contacte

dt o verif y cost informatio n previousl y providedt

o th e Research Triangl e Institut e (RTI ) fo r Dur r Environmental , Inc . rotar

y concentrato

r systems . I n respons e to Ms . Proctor' s question s Mr . Stone indicatedth e following : Th e pressur e drop in Dur

r rotar y concentrato

r systems withou

t an y pre-filtratio n i s between 6- 8 inche s an dthe combine

dfa n an dmoto r efficienc y i s betwee n 6 5 an d8 0 percent . The dat

aprovidedto RT

I i n 199 6 ar e fo r systems withou

t an y pre-filtration . Facilitie s generall y needa t leas t som e pre-filtration , however , th e amoun

t of pre-filtratio n varie s fromfacilit y to facility . Th e dat aprovide dt o RT I sho w n o ste p u p i n electrica l consumption due t o a

n increasedpressur

e dro p whe n switchin g fromarecuperativ

e t o aregenerative oxidize

r becaus e the therma

l efficienc y ofthe regenerativ e oxidizer

ha s been reduce dfrom9 5 to 9 0 percen t to yiel dahighe

r stac k ga s temperatur

e neede dto desor b the volatile organic compound s (VOCs ) fro mthe carbon in the pre-concentrator . The loweredtherma

l efficienc y reduce s the pressur

e drop fo r the regenerativ e oxidizer . Wit h regar dt o fue l use , Mr . Ston

e explaine dtha t facilitie s ma

y choose aconcentrator/recuperativ e oxidize r fo r flows les s tha

n 75,000 cf man daconcentrator

/ regenerative oxidize

r fo r flow s a t 75,000 cfi n an dabove . H e adde dtha t fromatechnolog

y standpoint, arecuperativ

e oxidize r coul db e useda

t an y flo w rat e eve n a t flows abov e 75,000 cfm, bu t fo r highe r flow rate s aregenerativ e oxidizer ma y b e abetter choic e froma

n economica

l standpoint . Mr . Stone addedtha t balancin g operatin g an

dcapita l cos t consideration s will determine th e customer' s choic e between arecuperativ e an daregenerativ e oxidizer .



# 3 ?P.4 0



### ATTACHMEN

T C Tabl e Preparedby Keit

h Barnet t Basedo n Applachia

n Plastic s Tri

p Repor t



### 3< 7| Kennet h Meardo n - Appalachia n Resin.xl s P.4 1 Pag e 1 1 Applicatio n Metho d Mechanical-Atomize d Mechanical-Atomize d Mechanical-Atomize d ^ Mechanical-Non-Atomize d Mechanical-Non-Atomize d Mprhanical-Non-Atomize d IVIvw l IO l MwGi l l iu i i niw i i n^v* u Mechanical-Non-Atomize d Mechanical-Npn-Atomize d / Mechanical-Atomize d * Mechanical-Atomize d Mechanical-Atomize d /Filamen t Windin g Filamen t Windin g / Filamen t Windin g v Filamen t Windin g Manua l —>> Manua l xiiM ^ Manua l Resi n Typ e Cor r Con Con Cor r Cor r Cor r Cor r Con NC R NC R NC R Cor r Quanit

y %HA P 70 4 280 0 14400 760 0 75744 1^7 R 

### /^5 3 ^cT^^ftT ^

Hig h Strengt h NC R NC R NC R NC R NC R 2773 9 •

19562 3 1485 3 3091 0 1186 4694 9 4260 6 15603 5820 9 23269 2 4541 0 27810 2 177 9 517 0 517 0 1211 9 i

3 6 3 9 4 9 4 1 4 3 3 6 3 9 35 2 9 4 0 37 4 3 35 2 9 4 0 3 7 4 0 4 0 Weighte d UE F Weighte d HA P 0.1295 6 0.5582 2 3.60694 1.59286 16.64933 2.4615 5 10.6180 8 4.9629 4 40.5794 7 9.1745 7 26.3349 6 0.9346 7 36.4442 1 31.4737 9 9.3818 0 40.8555 9 24.2647 2 6.53142 30.7961 4 5.4313 9 17.0641 1 17.0641 1 39.5596 2 UE F

154 19 7 34 0 9 6 10 2 8 0 8 9 7 7 47.3 2 21 1 168 177 13 3 106.72 160 106 12 3 123 0. 6

2. 8 25. 0 3. 7 39. 5 5 5 24. 4 10. 9 112.3 " 15. 0 139. 0 4. 3 158. 3 < ^

-to«^ > )3 ^ C is^.-vx129. 2 35. 5 SJ

f*Y\J3*-J-* a -*- a * 164.8* / <to#'ZfruJ n 89. 3 26. 1 115. 4 15. 5 52. 5 52. 5 120. 5 ^irvtt^Aa- o Ip-Juu- i

C G J



## H oP.4 2



### ATTACHMEN

T D Email fromChuc

k Taylo r to Keit h Barnet t (forwardedto Ke

n Meardon ) 1/30/0 2P.4 3 Pag e T

From : <Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov > To : <KRMeardon@mactec.com > Date : 1/30/0 2 3:41P M Subject : A.R.E . Inc . Ra w Materia l Usag e Dea rken ; W e nee d t o updat e th e informatio n fo rA.R.E . W e hav e 199 7 dat a fro m th e tri p report fo rMassillon , bu t w e di d no t spli t th e resi n int o fille d an d unfilled . W e di d no t eve n lis t A.R.E . i n th e unfille d table . Probabl y i t woul d b e bes t t o jus t us e th e 200 0 dat a fo rMassillo n an d Moun t Eaton . Th e 199 7 dat a fo rMoun t Eato n i n th e tri p report woul d no w b e considere d atypical . Keit h W . Barnet t US/EP A OAQPS , ESD/MIC G C504-0 5 Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 919-541-560 5 barnett.keith@epa.go v

—Forwarde d b y Keit h Barnett/RTP/USEPA/U S o n 01/30/200 2 03:2 5 P M

Chuc k Taylo r <ctaylor@gtenviron m To : Keit h Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EP A ental.com > cc : Ralp h Gatt i <rgatti@4ARE.com >

Subject : A.R.E . Inc . Raw Materia l Usag e 01/30/200 2 03:0 2 P M

Keith.. . A.R.E . Inc . provide d m e th e followin g information/dat a t o forwar d t o yo u concernin g th e us e o f resin s an d gelcoat s a t thei rtw o Ohi o facilitie s durin g C Y 2000 : Massillo n Facility : Gelcoa t Spray-Applie d 917,71 4 lb s H^? ^ Unfille d Resi n Spray-Applie d 2,142,71 4 lb s /•>-? ! -^ M Fille d Resi n Spray-Applie d Resi n 2,535,70 0 lb s 12-b" ) SS fyy Fille r801,28 1 lb s MCk-b H rp ^ Mt . Eato n Facility : Gelcoa t Spray-Applie d 157,88 8 lb s ^ * ^ W Unfille d Resi n Spray-Applie d 320,86 5 lb s | ^ D , L J Fille d Resi n Spray-Applie d Resi n 205,14 2 lb s | p' 2 . ^ I 

# q rP.4 4 "fT-xeTine ^

""*-* —~-~~ ~••• • --~—~>

—~~—~~~~~~-----

^ p ^ e ^
Fille r64,50 0 lb s 32. 2 S ftf M Let m e kno

w i f yo u hav

e any question s concernin g thes e data.. . Also , what' s th e forecas t fo rfina l adoptio n o f thi s MACT? I'v

e got peopl e askin g m e ifth e 112(j ) "MAC T Hammer

" wil l com e int o play.. . Wha t ca n yo u tel l m e abou t this ? I'v e go t th e sam e question s concernin g th e plastics part s coatin g MACT.. . D o yo u hav e anytyhin g yo u ca n shar e abou t that MAC

T as well ? Thanks , Chuc k Taylo r Principa l Consultan t G T Environmental , Inc . 635 Park Meado w Road , Suit e 11 2 Westerville , O H 4308 1 (614)794-357 0 (614)899-925 5 FA

X ctaylor@gtenvironmental.co m



# 4 3P.4 5



### ATTACHMEN

T E FA X fromKevin Maa s to Ke

n Meardon 4/2/0 2



# q ^

# I -

U J U J

U J



# U . 

# PEAR

L Thtre-s Only Ont

Trut Whirlpools)



### _#o f Pages : (includin

g this cove r sheet ) cT O > Name : > Company : > Facsimile : 

# : ^A ry!py

\ fYWrA^ p

FRO M > Name : favUft uWl« 5 > Company : MESSAGE «Kkn - rWe.' ^ vpUft T T fn-ol A <A\ aup . fc)'\Ji 

# _k £ £AUQ _ I f an yo f th e page s ar e illegibl e o rno t received , pleas e contac t u s a t 763-424-333 5 fo rre-transmission . > < 

# o O 

# m
m m

•-c rrv j \ Cv J

C O G > O O O- •V rv j Cv j VD Cv J

O 

### Toolin g Ge l Coa t ^Toolin g Ge l Coa l HAPConten l Productio n p Surfac e Characteristic s o

f Finish* * Frequenc

y Re-wor k

LfeofMol d Identifie r Tota l o r Repai r "^ r Part s o f Us e Frequenc

y Suoolie r (Jrcnst w 85-50394 0 85-50805 0 CMVOU T 945YA05 8 <bc«,vi**>-**

\ B-M5 0 Ferro CorporaUo n

Ferr o Corporatio n Coo k Composite

s H KResearc h 39.9 4

41.9 7 4670 3 4 2 Productio n i

Repai r ProducUon 8 Repai r Productio n 8 Repai r Productio n 8 Repai r Tub s & Tubshower s Tub s & Tubshower

s Tub s S Tubshower

s Tubs & Tubshower

s Class "A" Surface - Automotiv e Grad e Finis h Clas s "A " Surfac e - Automotiv e Grad e Finis h Clas s "A ' Surfac e - Automotiv e Grad e Finis h Class "A" Surfac e - Automotiv e Grad e Finis h 2. 5 times pe r da y 2. S time s pe r day 2. 5 lime s pe r da y 2. 5 limes pe r da y Ever

y 10 0 part s Ever y 10 0 part s Ever y 10 0 part s Ever y 10 0 part s Undetermine d

Undetermine d Approximatel y 12.00 0 Part s Undetermine d

u (J l I c r m ac a. L U o .

i > m v£ > Cv J < s Q Cv l i Cvj Q I Cmi <L , I I„,U A Note : Th e Ferr o material s ais o contai n a smal l amoun t o r benzen e accordin g t o Ih e MSD S sheets . Th e MSD S sheet s als o [is t Ih e tota l

volatile s b y weigh l a s bein g highe r tha n th e su m o f styren e an d MM A a s show n i n th e tat . .

,..,.*. . ' I

^ 1P.4 8



### ATTACHMEN

T F Not e fromBristo l Fiberlit

e Fil e Documenting phone cal

l fro mMadeline Stru

mto AshlandChemica

l 12/03/9 6



## 4~ 7P.4 9 

### from fo-ri^b» B ' baswie. G VL. C<xbfackad

-t o p& lo/^nqio co/Hoier



### O ~b~l% r<A? '"> | 7 W Y 4 3 + It ?'? J >r/ V ; • >^- ^ r~ ? / / ^ 

## ^ 7 ? //J

K


# * 7 

# S * '^/ 

# / ^

^ /> ' 

# / £ - 7 o 

# 7 * ^ 7 . 7 *** *

/ * . : - • • } a 

# Vi?. t 'y^T^

\___y -.



### ^/aymZ/ '%
tl I 

## f 3 % ; 5



# 4 SP.5 0



### ATTACHMEN

T G Email fromJoh

n Schweitze

r t o Keit h Barnet t 3/19/0 2



# M< \P.5 1 ; Kennet h Meardo n - Re : Update s t o th e databas e PageT J

From : "Joh n Schweitzer " <jschwtzr@gte.net > To : <Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov> Date : 3/19/021:59P M Subject : Re : Updates t o th e databas e Keith , th e contac

t names an d phon e number s are include d i n th e reports at th e en d o f m y messag e (below) . Joh n

—Origina l Messag e — From : Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.go v To : Joh n Schweitze r Cc : KRMeardon@mactec.co m Sent : Tuesday , Marc h 19,200 2 1:4 4 P M Subject : Re : Update s t o th e databas e Pleas e sen d you rlis t o

f contac t names an d w e wil l handl e an y follow up . I wil l wan t t o doubl e chec k thi s (w e ar e gettin g int o anothe ron e of thes e goin g roun d an d roun d makin g change s t o th e data base ) an d mak e a writte n recor

d of th e conversatio n so I hav e documentatio n i f w e are late rchallenge d o n thes e changes . Keit h W . Bamet

t US/EP A OAQPS , ESD/MIC G C504-0 5 Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 919-541-560 5 bamett.keith@epa.go

v Joh n Schweitze rTo : Keit h Bamett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA <jschwtzr@gte cc : "Larr y (LJ ) Craigie " .net > <lcraigie@cfa-hq.org >

Subject : Update s t o th e databas e 03/19/200 2 01:2 8 P M Pleas e respon d t o Joh n Schweitze r

Keith , belo

w i s th e "ra

w data " fro m ou rcontact s wit h som e o f th e facilitie s i n th e ne

w combine d non-C R mechanica l database . (Thes e companie s wer

e contacte d b

y Larr y Craigi e o f th e CF

A Technica l Department. ) 

## SoP.5 2 j Kennet h Meardo n - Re : Update s t o th e databas e Pag e 2 \

I n summary : 1 . Contemporar

y Product s makes onl y ver

y limite d us e o

f VS R an d vacuu m bagging , contrar

y t o what' s show n i n th e database . Also , the y hav e a uniqu e double-roll-ou t process tha t probabl y increase s thei remission s significantl y (t o a n unknow n level) . The y shoul d be remove d fro m thi s databas e (o rthei remissio n rat e assume d t o b e "unknown") . 2 . CD R System s ( 3 plants ) doe s no t us e any mechanica l applicatio n an d shoul d b e remove d fro m thi s database . 3 . Custo m Fiberglas s Moldin g ha s gon e bac k

t o atomize d applicatio n du e t o qualit

y problems . Th e emissio n rat e fo rthi s operatio n shoul d b e re-estimate d base d o n atomize d application . 4 . Livingsto n ha

s stoppe d operation s an d shoul d b e remove d fro m thi s database . 5 . Kruege rInternationa l n o longe rdoe s FR P fabricatio n an d shoul d b e remove d fro m thi s database . Th e databas e shoul d b e corrected , an d th e floo radjusted , t o reflec t thi s up-to-dat e information . Pleas e let m e kno w i f yo u nee d u s t o provid e mor

e information , as k

th e source s t o contac

t yo u directly , o re t cetera . Thanks , Joh n Contemporar

y Products , # 8 Stev e McNall y 262 78 1 513 0 A) The y d o no t us e Vacuu m baggin g ver y muc h i n fac

t almost non e i n th e last tw o years . B) Th e onl y tim e they us e a VS R i s o n a ge l coa t whe n i t i s applie d t o a fabricate d part . C ) The y hav e a modifie d flow coate rthe y us e regularl y bu t thei rproces s require s they we t an d rol l o n th e we t ou t tabl e the n mov e th e wette d fabri c t o th e mol d wher e i t i s rolle d again . Thi s doubl e rollin g an d movin g th e composit e double s th e emission s fro m th e rol l ou t process . D) Th e databas e doe s not give the m credi t fo rVS R o rvacuu m bagging . Als o i t doe s not penalize d he m fo rdoubl e roll-ou t process . CD R Systems , #"511,12,1 3 A l Kaedin g 386 61 5 951 9 A) Th e styren e Spe c fb ral l plants i s 35 % ma x B ) The y qui t usin g flow coater

s du e t o quaiit

y problem s instea d they us e manua l applicatio n no

t spra y guns . 

# 5 'P.5 3 tkenn'ed-Meadon-ke : Update s , o ih e databas e Kgm **ggg£^^__£ggg*gg*g'g-g'^'g^QBHMH''''''''''''''|'''''''*''M'l' ^

C ) The y d o not us e Vacuu m Ba g technique s i n thi s proces s Custo m Fiberglas s Molding , In c # 1 5 Richar d Dische r(sp? ) 92 0 86 7 260 6 A ) Switche d t o HVL P (atomized ) applicatio n i n place o f flow coater

s du e t o qualit y a n productivit

y problems . Livingston , In c #1 6 Bo b Morgenster n 25 3 28 8 052 0 / Ceceli a Jackso n 31 3 33 6 418 2 A ) Thi s plan t wa s purchase d b y Cambridg e Industrie s an d soo n wen t chapte r 11 . B) Meridia n Automotive bough t thi s portio n ofth e Cambridg e assets . Thi s plan t locate d i n Aubur n Washingto n ha s bee n shu t down . Kruege rI ntemationa l #1 9 Ra y Rosenea u 92 0 468-810 0 X2664 / Laur a Mischinsk i 92 0 49 6 684 6 A) K l n o longe rperform s FR P wor k a t th e Gree n Ba

y location . Th e K l FR P mfg . a

t Gillette , W l was sol d t o Wasack i an d ma y stil l b e doin g FRP . FROM======================= = Joh n Schweitze r Sr . Directo ro f Gov't . Affair s Composite s Fabricator

s Assoc . voic e 734.622.016 2 fax734.622.012 2 jschwtzr@gte.ne t www.cfa-hq.or

g

CC : <KRMeardon@mactec.com >



# 5 ^P.5 4



### ATTACHMEN

T H Lette r fromJoh n Lau x t o Keit h Bamet t 2/8/00



## S 3P.5 5 

# GL P Grea t Lake

s Plastics Corporatio n

P.O . Bo x60 0 Houghto n Count y

Airpar k Hancock , M l 4993 0 906/482-375 0 FAX : 906/482-258 5 2/8/0 0

Mi . Keit h Bamet t USEP A MD1 3 RTP.N C 2771 1 Dea r Mr . Bamet

t Grea t Lake s Plastic s Corporatio n i s appreciativ e o f tiie opportunit

y t o expres s ou

r concern s regardin g th e propose dMAC

T standards . Becaus e of tiie variable s withi n th e composite s industr y including productio n technology , materials , and equipmen t suitable fo r eac h process , i t

i s difficul t t o accept th e "on e siz e fits al l concept" . We i n th e tub andshowe

r categor y woul dhav e som

e difficult y meetin g th e propose dstandard s mainly i n th e area s o f

equipmen t investment , suitabl e availabl e material s an dth e additiona l cos t fo r them , an do f cours e th e requiremen

t t o mak e acapito l investmen

t t o install equipmen

t t o meet th e perquisite s ofth e EP

A i n emissio n control , i f

w e find ourselve s i n tha

t category . W e have workedver

y diligently ove

r th e pas t twenty-five year s t o produc e ahigh qualit y produc t an d cultivat e acustome

r bas e tha t remain s loya

l today . Th

e additiona

l cos t tha t w e woul dhav e t o absor

b o r pas s o n t o th e consume

r woul dno t permit u s t o remai n i n tiie marke t

Tha t i s afact . Example s o f

som e o f tiiese costs : Ne w equipmen

t - w e hav e alread

y introduce dtw o flo

w coat-laminating gun s i n Decembe r a t acos t o f $15,000 we ar

e considering agelcoa

t systema t thi s tim e also , andathirdflow coate r fo r laminatin g acryli c products . Resin - w e hav e bee n quote do n lo w styren e resi n cost s tha t woul dequat

e t o almos t

a$100^00 0 pe r yea r increas e base do n ou

r current usage . Thi s doe s no t

include gelcoa

t increase s whe n w e decide t o mak e tha t transition ; bu t

afai r estimat e woul db e a

n additiona

l $30,000 t o $40,000 . Product qualit y - coul db e jeopardize dbecaus e o f modifie do r suppresse dresin s tha

t woul dno t wor k wel l i n atwo-coa

t process . We woul db e fearfu l o f produc t failur e an dth e cos t

andrepercussion s the y present . Futur e Growt h Potentia l - we woul db e require dt o remain under th e 10 0 to n threshol dwhic h w e presen t a s aconcembase don you

r proposa l t o contro l efficienc

y o n facilitie s ove

r tha t leve L Thi s would b e cos t prohibitive an dtotall y restrictiv e t o our growt h potentia l an dcustome

r commitmen

t t o our products . Introducing engineering device s suc h a s absorber s o r afte r burner s woul dno t

b e feasible a

t thi s poin t becaus e ofth e enormou s investmen t required . Throughou

t ou r composite s histoi y w e hav e stave dt o find method s an dmaterial s tha t hav e addresse dth e ver y concern s o f

EPA , a s di dmos t

i n our industry . W

e hav e achievednumerou s successe s andcontinu e t o see k otiie r improvement s a s well . Our organization , "Composite s Fabricator s Association " ha s don e comprehensiv

e evaluation s ofou r

processe s andha s share dthi s informatio n wit h it s member s an dwitii EPA . Th e facts spea

k fo r themselves . I

t i s our hop e tha t EP A will conside

r al l ofth e cuiren t

infonnatio n prior t o establishing afinal dictate . Manufacturers

of 

# War m R a 11 1 Moulded Bathing

ModulesP.5 6

It i s witii grea

t anticipation tha

t fhi s entir e industiy , which ha s struggleds o har dan dha s achieveds o much , await s a n informedan

dfavorabl e consideratio n s o tha

t i t ma y continue t o flourish. Sincerely , lera l Manage r Joh n J . Laux JL/s h



## S SP.5 7



### ATTACHMEN

T I Facilit y Surve y Tabl e Preparedb

y Mik e Cassid y (Kohle r Co. ) Sen t to Ke n Meardon b

y email 4/10/0 2



### S(*P.5 8 •jfRehnet h Meardon - RP C MACTqljestionnaJre^Aprii02~do c " ''""" " Pag e 1 1

Apri l 10 , 200 2

Kennet h R . Meardo n PACIFI C ENVIRONMENTA L SERVICES , INC . Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2770 9 Dea r Ken : Subject : RP C MAC T Questionnair e Fo rKohle rCo.' s - Brownwood . TX Facilitv Attache di s atabl e providin g th e informatio n requeste din your Marc h 27 , 200 2 fa

x t o me fo r Kohle r Co.' s Brownwood , T

X RP C fixtur

e fabricatio n facility . Thi s facilit y operate s a

n FR P fixture plant

anda n acryli c fixture plant . I hav e liste dth e operatin g hour s for eac h plan t separately . The gelcoa

t resi n i s attributabl e t o th e FRP plant only . Th e bondin g resi n i s attributabl e t o th e acryli c plant

only . Th e general-purpos e cho p coa t resi n represent s th e total use di n bot h plants . I f you hav e an

y question s about

thi s information , I ma

y b e contacte da

t 920-457-4441 , extensio n 77263 , or

vi ae-mai l a

t mike.cassidv(fl),kohler.com .

Sincerely , Mik e Cassid y Kohler Co . Enclosure



## 5 7P.5 9 j Kennet h iVfeardo n - RPC^ ^ "Fage~2~ |

Facilit y Nam e andLocation* . Kohler

Co . - Brownwood . T

X Hour s o f Operation* . Acryli c Fixtur e Plant : 3,48 0 hrs FR P Fixtur e Plant : 2,39 5 hr s Yea r fo r Which DataI s Bein g Reported : 200 1

FACILIT Y SURVE Y TABL E Proces s Grouping

Ope n molding : mechanica l Ope n molding : filled, non coirosion , mechanical Ope n molding : filled , non corrosion , mechanical Materia l

Pigmente dgel coa

t Genera l purpos e cho p coa t resin Acryli c bondin g resin Quantit y Use d (tpy)

1 6 138 6 170 Average HA P Conten t (wt. % )
36-4 5 44-4 8 36-3 9 Application

Technique
Spra y (100% )
mechanical , non-atomize d (impingemen t

guns ) (100% ) mechanical , non-atomize d (impingemen t

guns ) (100% ) Othe rEnlissio n Reduction Technique

none
none

none Colo r

(gel coat only )

Al l colors, includin g whit e N A N A



# 5?P.6 0



### ATTACHMEN

T J Lette r fromWayn

e Spidah l (Nordi c Fiberglass , Inc. ) t

o Keit h Barnet t 2/13/0 0



## S<\P.6 1



# ORDI C FIBERGLASS , INC . p.o . BO X 27 Warren , Minnesot a 5676 2 TELEPHONE : (218 ) 745-509 5 E-MAIL : nordic@ruralaccess.ne t FAX : (218 ) 745-499 0 www.nordicfiberglass.co m

Februar y 13 , 200 0 Mr . Keit h Bamet t U S EP A MD1 3 ' RTP.N C 2771 1 Dea r Mr . Barnett , Nordi c Fiberglas s produce s fiberglas s equipmen t for th e electii c utilit y industry . Ou r produc t consist s o f pa dmoun t

transforme r

bo x pad s an ddifferen t

enclosure s for

electrica l apparatus . A s th e utilit y industr y upgrad e thei r

system s fromove r

hea dpowe r

line s t o undergroun dline s th e marke t wil l continu e t o grow . Ou r typ e o f fiberglass product s wil l pla y apivota l rol e i n no t onl y ne w constructio n bu t als o repai r

o f curren t unde r groun dwirin g systems . Ther e are tw o material s tha t coul dreplac e th e fiberglas s 5 " tal l transforme r

support pads , plasti c an dconcret e bu t at thi s tim e ther e i s n o pad s o f greate r heigh t 15 " t o 32 " inheigh t that ca n replac e thes e product s mad e o f fiberglass . Th e talle r

product s giv e bette r

stabilit y i n th e soi l an dallo w for

th e cabl e t o b e coile dunde r th e transformer. ' I n 1999 , two 1 larg e investo r owne dutilitie s switc h fro mconcret e fla

t pad s t o fiberglass bo x pad s whic h tells rne o f thecos t effectivenes s o f

usin g fiberglass ove r

concrete . Th e reaso n that wa s give n wa s dii e t o th e long-ten n benefit s o f th e fiberglas s bo x pad . O n tli e enclosur e lin e w e ar e seein g th e utilitie s mov e frommeta l enclosure s t o fiberglas s enclosures . Ther e ar e 2 reason s I believ e i s causin g thi s change , 1 . I n tim e meta l wil l begi n t o rus t an dth e utilit y wil l b e require dt o repain t

it . Thi s wil l creat e unconuolle demission s 2 . Becans e o f tli e hig h dielectri c strengt h o f fiberglas s i s i

t safer fo r th e genera l publi c than metal . Shoul dth e syste mgroun dfail o n th e meta l enclosur e th e enclosur e coul dbecom e energized . Shoul dthi s happe n o n th e fiberglass enclosure , th e dielectri c strength i s great enoug h t o protec t

th e syste minsid e for

mos t failures . Ove r th e pas t 1 0 year s w e hav e bee n reviewin g method s t o reduc e styren e emissions . I believ e tha t . . sourc e reductio n i s th e answer , no t contro l an dcaptur e equipment . Durin g thi s time , w e hav e bee n workin g o n ou r fonnulation s an dequipment with differen t

degree s o f

succes s an dfailure . I n 198 9 w e switche dove r t o aBP O cure dresi n whic h at first w e though t

gav e u s les s emissio n bu t w e coul dno t substantiate . A t

thi s tim e ou r

styren e level s wer e aroun d48-50% . I gav e tli e directio n t o ou r resi n supplier s t o develo p alowe r styren e conten t

resin . I n th e earl y developmen t o f thes e resin s w e ha d som e larg e problem s with th e resins . However , i n 199 8 w e wer e abl e t o get tw o lowe r

styren e resin s t o work on e a t 42 % an don e at

35% . Whe n w e dro p belo w thes e level s th e product s begi n to loos e workabilit y an dto o muc h strengt h i s los t i n th e produc t

du e t o th e decreas e i n cross-linkin g o r lac k o f styrene . O n th e gel-coat s w e are currentl y workin g o n lowe r VO C gel-coat s bu t

ther e agai n th e material s requir e th e highe r HA P leve l to gai n th e workabilit y an drequire dfieldperfonnance . W e hav e reviewe dman y differen t moldin g technique s t o includ e RT M an dVacuu mmolding . M y feelin g o n these'system s i s the y wil l work i f yo u ca n ru n you r

operatio n a s acos t

plu s operation s I n today' s climat e thi s i s ho t

an option . The y wer e slo w an dha dman y limitation s for highe r volum e productio n an d t o costl y for

lowe r volum e production . (oO 

### >>> Qualit y Product s fo rth e Electri c Utilit y Industr y << <P.6 2

W e hav e bee n movin g ou r highe r volum e part s int o compressio n moldin g usin g SM C an dwe t moldin g whe n cos t effective . W e wil l continu e t o mov e i n thi s directio n whe n i t i s cos t effectiv e an dth e volum e o f sale s vvil l support th e capito l investmen t

required . Hand s down , thes e option s optimiz e emissio n reductio n technolog y at

th e source . On e are atha

t ha s receive dn o attentio n i s th e us e o f roboti c sprayer s for

applyin g th e choppe dglas s an d resin . W e currentl y hav e tw o system s runnin g an dathir don e o n order . W e ar e usin g th e lowe r HA P resin , 35% , o n both system s becaus e ofth e control s tha t w e hav e with roboti c spraying . Wh y i s thi s no t bein g addresse di n th e MAC T standarda s controlle dspraying ? I completel y understan dwh y th e EP A woul dno t wan t t o accep t controlle dsprayin g tecluiique s wit h amanua l system . Bu t with aroboti c system , onc e programme dcorrectl y w e hav e realize dalarg e reductio n i n ove r spra y an dw e kno w ou r

transfe r efficienc y ha s increase dwhic h reduce s emissions . Th e sprayin g i s no w don e a t th e sam e distanc e fro mth e mol d every time . Th e tiiir

dsyste mo n orde r

wil l hav e aclose dloo p s o whe n th e progra mi s final th e robo t wil l contro l al l movement s an dai r pressure s for

th e resi n an dchoppe dglass . If dii s work s lik e w e believ e i t will , th e first

tw o system s wil l the n b e u p grade dto includ e th e close dloo p technology . I s i t possibl e t o get a n explanatio n a s t o why th e us e o f robotic s i s no t

bein g considere da s controlle dspraying ? Overall , in th e pas t

te n year s w e hav e bee n u p gradin g ou r operation s t o compl y with th e MAC T standards . Shoul dth e EP A requir e fo r operation s suc h a s ou r

t o instal l an y typ e o f

contro l o r

captur e technolog y w e woul dhav e n o choic e bu t t o star t closin g ou r

plants . W e currentl y hav e 1 1 plant s tha t tota l aroun d 100,00 0 squar e feet . Base do n $500,00 0 capito l investmen t for eac h plan t

i t woul drequire , for

u s t o inves t $5,500,000 . W e hav e alread y researche dthi s investmen t an dhav e conclude dtha

t thi s typ e o f

investment , no t t o includ e di e operationa l expense , woul dno t b e financially possibl e fo r Nordi c at

thi s tim e o r

i n th e fiiture . I als o d o no t

understan dth e full though t o f th e EPA . If

fabricator s instal l contro l an dcaptur e equipmen t

yo u reduc e th e amoun t

o f styren e release db y burnin g natura l ga s whic h als o release s C0 2 t o th e environment . However , whe n yo u ar e bumin g natura l ga s yo u are als o emittin g nitioge n oxide . Whe n styren e i s emitte dint o th e atmospher e i t break s dow n fairl y fas t

an di s als o turne dint o C02 . S o what i s gaine dbu t

t o us e u p mor e o f

a n un-renewabl e resource , natura l gas . I hav e no t bee n abl e t o findresearc h informatio n a s to ho w muc h C0 2 that th e styren e bein g emitte di s estimate dt o releas e int o th e atmospher e opposedto ho w muc h th e contro l o r captur e equipmen t

woul demit . Doe s th e EP A hav e informatio n pertainin g t o this ? I f

not , thi s i s somethin g tha t I believ e shoul db e researche dbefor e captur e equipmen t i s installed . Also , wha

t wil l di e direc t

economi c impac t

b e t o th e fiberglass industry du e t o job s losse s oye r suc h amandate ? I n ou r

compan y i t

woul ddirectl y affec t

al l 13 0 employee s tha

t woul db e withou t

ajob . I loo k forwardt o your

comment s o n th e us e o f

robotics . Sincerely , -y^ ~

Wayn e L . Spidah l Genera l Manage r Nordi c Fiberglassjnc .

(ffP.6 3



### ATTACHMEN

T K Lette r fromSteve Alliso n (Plasti c Developmen t Co. ) t o Keit h Barnet t 2/15/0 0



## 6 ^P.6 4



### Plasti c flq Developmen

t Compan y Wes t Fourt h Stree t Pos t Office Box 400 7 Williamsport,P

A 1770 1 570.323.306 0 800.451.142 0 fa x 570.323.848 5 http://www.pldevco.co

m pdcspas@pldevco.co

m



## pdcs^Q s Februar y 15,200 0 Mr . Keit h Bamet t USEP A MD1 3 Research Triangle Park , NC 2771 1 Dea r Mr . Barnett : Thi s letter i s t o addres s the concern s w e hav e ove r th e ne w MAC

T standard . At

Plasti c Developmen

t Company , Inc. , w e manufactur e fiberglas s spas an

dbaths . W

e star t wit h apiec e o f

cas t acryli c sheet , whic h i s vacuu

mforme dandthe n backe dwit

h fiberglass fo

r support . The environmen

t tha t asp ai s subjec t

to , th e chemicals , an dhigh wate r temperatur

e i s ver y demanding . I t

i s critical that

there i s asuperior

bon d between the acryli c andsubstrate . Vinyl este r resin s pla y ake y rol e fo r u s i n tha t regard . Th

e sp aindustr

y nation-wide ha s made th e chang e t o vinyl este r i n the pas t five years , whic h ha s mad e on th e whol e amuc h mor e reliabl e product . Using resi n othe r than vinyl ester

or alo w styren e vinyl este r whic h in m y experienc e doe s no t

hav e th e superior

adhesio n woulddrastically reduc e the qualit y andperformanc e ofthi s product . Yo u ca n se e how imperativ e i t

i s t o us e astron g bondin g resi n on th e first laminat e howeve r the 2 n d

### and3 r d

### laminat

e only nee dto hav e good structura l characteristics . Lo w styren e resi n ar e apossibilit y i n thi s par

t ofth e process , bu

t the manufacture

r of thes e resi n needt o mak

e thes e a t a lo w cos t andeasie r t o wor k wit h than wha

t i s currently available . Alternativ e technology suc

h a s vacuumbaggin g wil l no t wor k on spa s due t o th e drasti c irregula

r shap e ofthi s product . However , w e have investe di n the Flo Coate

r syste mb y Venu s Gusmer , which i s working ver y wel l fo r us . I f thes e rul e change s ar

e allowe dwithou t

furthe r investigatio n on th e impact t o the sp aindustry , th e resul t coul db e possibly b e ahighe r cos t an dlowe r qualit y produc t fo r consumers . Sincerely , 

### ></2^ Steve Alliso n Productio n Manage

r

<o3P.6 5



### ATTACHMEN

T L Spreadsheets prepare dby Lasc o

2/13/0 2

^6 ^ Plan l Anahei m Soul h Bosto n 3 River s Lancaste r Cordel e Yel m Elizabethtow n Moap a Tota l Gelcoa t

1,825,71 8 1,042,25 5 1,435,18 2 1,424.17 7 1.450,50 5 1,095,01 8 1.285.82 3 1,367,46 8 10,926,14 6 % Styren a

36 % 3 6 % 36 % 3 6 % 36 % 3 6 % 3 6 % 3 6 % UE F

17.8 % 17.8 % 17.6 % 17.8 % 17.8 % 17.8 % 17.8 % 17.8 % EMISSION S PERCEN T O F TOTA L EMISSION S Pound a o f Resi n Usa d Emission s 324.97 8 185.52 1 255.46 2 253,50 4 258,19 0 194,91 3 22 8 87 6 24 3 40 9 1,944,85 4 46.4 % Laminat e rati o 7.084.43 9 3.627.35 4 5,061.10 2 5,167,00 4 5,095,45 0 4,546.33 8 4,523,79 8 •'•. ••22 23 5 4 0 528,72 0 % Styren e 3 6 0 % 3 9 0 % 3 9 0 % 3 9 0 % 390 % 3 6 0 % 3 9 0 % 3 6 0 % [Ma y 2000 - A >rt l 2001 ) ue f 4 0 % 4.5 % 4.5 % 4.5 % 4 5 % 4 0 % 4 5 % 4 0 % Emission s

283.37 8 161,41 7 225,21 9 229,93 2 226.74 8 181,85 4 201.30 9 216.92 9 1,726.73 5 42.9 % 935,61 6

437,06 9 629,31 5 652,96 0 616.55 8 541,44 8 541,54 1 553,07 8 5.007.58 5 367 =

36 % 3 6 % 36 % 3 6 % 3 6 % 3 6 % 3 6 % U E F

7.0 % . * 7.0 % | 7 0 % 7.0 % •7.0 % 7 0 % 7.0 % 7 0 % | B

5 49 3 30.59 5 ••••' . 05 2 45.70 7 43.15 9 37,90 1 37,90 8
•:•' •• • H Tota l Emiaaion a 1 673,84 8 377,53 3 524,73 3 529,14 2 528,09 6 414,66 8 468,09 3 506.05 4 350.53 1 4,022.17 0 8.7 % 100 % PLANT S WIT H PARTIA L CONTROL S gelcoate d product s onl y Plan t Sout h Bosto n Lancaste r Yel m Elizabethtow n Moap a Gelcoa t

1.042,25 5 1,424.17 7 1,095,01 8 1.285.82 3 1,367,46 6 Emission s

185,52 1 253.50 4 194,91 3 228.87 6 243.40 9 % Contro l Ne t Emission s

77.6 % 77.6 % 77.6 % 77.6 % 9 2 2 % 41,58 1

56,81 7 43.68 6 51.29 8 19.08 3 Laminat e Resi n

3.627.35 4 5,167,00 4 4.546.33 8 4,523.79 8 5.423,23 5 Emission s 161.41 7 229,93 2 181,85 4 201,30 9 216.92 9 % Contro l 46.1 % 46.1 % 23.0 % "J 5 1 % 92.2 % Ne t Emission s 87,03 6 12 3 97 9 13 9 95 4 10 8 54 6 1 7 00 7 iWCoa l

437.06 9 552,96 0 541,44 8 541,54 1 653.07 8 Emission s

:- c -.'.••- : 4 5 70 7 3 7,90 : 37,90 8 4 5 71 5 % Contro l

150 % 0 0% .

. 0.0 % 77,6 % 9 2 2 % Ne t Emisston s

.' . 59 5 45,70 7 37.90 1 B 49 6 3.56 4 Tota l Emission s

159,21 2 226,50 4 221,54 1 168,34 0 3S.67 5 % Controlle d 57,8 % • 57.2 % 46.6 % * 64.0 % S2:; % Precas t Gelcoa t

L a m 1
La m 2 Phas e Spra y Cur e Spra y Cur e Spra y Rol l Cur e Spra y Rol l C u e Percen t

b y Phas e 6 7 % 3 3 % 6 7 % 3 3 % 5 0 % 2 5 % 2 5 % 5 0 % 2 5 % 2 5 %

Anahei m Sout h Bosto n 3 River s Lancaste r Cordel e Yel m Elizabethtow n Moap a Acryli c Resi n lbs/yea rFY200 1 n o acryli c manufacturin g 2.278,63 8 pound s n o acryli c manufacturin g n o acrvli c manufactunn g n o acryli c manufacturin g 769,37 9 pound s n o acryli c manufacturin g n o acryli c manufacturin g Estimate d captur e Gelcoa t (Moapa ) Gelcoa t Barrie rCoa t 1s t Laminat e Resi n (Moapa ) 2nd/3r d Laminat e Resi n (Moapa ) 1s t Laminat e Resi n 2nd/3r d Laminat e Resi n Spra y 9 6 % 9 6 % 96% 9 6 % 9 6 % 9 6 % 9 6 % Rol l

n a r.i-,
n a 9 6 % 9 6 % 0 % 0 % Cur e

9 6 % 5 0 % 5 0 % 9-6 % 9 6 % 0 % 0 % Tota l Captur e 96.0 % 808 % 8 0 3 % 9 6 0 % 96.0 % 48.0 % 4 8 0 % % Destructio n 9 6 % 9 6 % 9 6 % 9 6 % 9 6 % 9 6 % 06 * Tota l % Controlle d 92.2 % 77.6 %
92.2 % 92.2 % 46.1 % 4 6 1 %
1 METHO D 204 HA S NO T BEE N USE D T O DETERMIN E CAPTUR E EFFICIENCY . 2 DU E T O TH E PUSH/PUL L MAKE-U P AI R & EXHAUS T SYSTE M AN D TH E CONVEYO R METHO D O F MOVIN G PART S METHO D 20 4 COUL D NO T B E DESIGNE D INT O TH E PRODUCTIO N PROCES S UNLES S CONTROLLE D A T 100 % WIT H GREATE R AI R FLOW S 3 AL L FUGITIVE S AR E ESTIMATE D A T 4 % (FO R AL L PROCESSES ) DU E T O TH E EXTREMEL Y LO W AI R FLOW S AND/O R DIFFERE N O F MAKE-U P T O EXHAUS T AI R FLO W RATIO S 4 TH E RT O @ YEL M I S ONL Y USE D A S NEEDE D T O STA Y BELO W CA P O F 24 9 TP Y 5 Acryli c resi n usag e fo rsam e perio d = 2,278,63 8 lb s (Sout h Boston ) & 769,37 9 lb s (Yelm ) 6 Magnu m FI T equipmen t operationa l a t eac h plan t approx . TIA L

Anahei m Sout h Bosto n 3 River s Lancaste r Cordel e Yel m Elizabethtow n Moap a DAT E Jul-0 0 Oct-0 1 Sep-0 1 Sep-0 1 Aug-0 2 May-0 1 Apr-0 1 Jul-0 0 Mixin g Typ e

Intema l Intema l Intema l Interna l Interna l Intema l Intema l Externa l^ ^ PLANT S WIT H PARTIA L CONTROL S gelcoate d product s onl y

Plan t Sout h Bosto n Lancaste r Elizabethtow n Moap a Gelcoa t

1.04 2 25 5 1.424.17 7 1.285,82 3 1.367.46 8 Emission s

185.52 1 253.50 4 228.87 6 243.40 9 % Contro l Ne t Emission s

7 7 6 % 77.6 % 77.6 % 0 0 % 41.58 1

56,81 7 51.29 8 243.40 9 Laminat e Resi n

3,627,35 4 5 16 7 00 4 4.523.79 8 5 423,23 5 Emission s

58 9 44 5 839,63 8 735,11 7 881.27 6 % Contro l

4 6 1% 46.1 % 46.1 % 0.0 % Ne t Emission s

31 7 82 9 45 2 73 3 396,37 5 881.27 6 Barte rCoa t

437,06 9 652.96 0 541.54 1 653.07 8 Emission s

61,84 5 92.39 4 76,62 8 9 2 4 1 1 % Contro l

0.0 % 0 0 % 77.6 % 0.0 % Ne t Emission s

6 1 84 5 92.39 4 17.17 4 92.41 1 Tota l Emission s

421.25 5 601,94 4 464,84 7 1 217.09 6 % Controlle d • 49.7 % •43.2 % 55.3 % • 0 0 % Proces s Gelcot i

La m 1 La m 2 Phas e Spra y Cur e Spra y Cur e Spra y Rol l Cur e Spra y Rol l Cur e Percen i

b y Phas e 6 7 % 3 3 % 6 7 % 3 3 % 5 0 % 2 5 % 2 5 % 5 0 % 2 5 % 2 5 % Estimate d captur e Gelcoa t (Moapa ) Gelcoa t Barrie rCoa t (Moapa ) Spra y 9 6 % 0 % .-- : Barrie rCoat- - 96 % 1s t Laminat e Resi n (Moapa ) 0 % 2nd'3r d Laminat e Resi n (Moapa ) 0 % 1s t Laminat e Resi n 96 % 2nd/3r d Laminat e Resi n ' 6 Pol l n a n a n a n a 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Cur e

0 % 5 0 % 0 % 50 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Tota l Captur e

0 0 % 808 % 0 0 % 80.8 % 0.0 % Q 0 % 4 8 0 % 48.0 % % OestructJo n | Tota l % Controlle d 0 % 0.0 % 96 % 77.6 % 0 % 9 6 % 0 % 0 % 9 6 % 9 6 % 0.0 %

77.6 % 0 0% 0 0 % . 46*1 % 46.1 % 1 METHO D 204 HA S NO T BEE N USE D T O DETERMIN E CAPTUR E EFFICIENCY . 2 DU E T O TH E PUSH/PUL L MAKE-U P AI R & EXHAUS T SYSTE M AN D TH E CONVEYO R METHO D O F MOVIN G PART S METHO D 20 4 COUL D NO T B E DESIGNE D INT O TH E PRODUCTIO N PROCES S UNLES S CONTROLLE D A T 100 % WIT H GREATE R AI R FLOW S 3 AL L FUGITIVE S AR E ESTIMATE D A T 4 % (FO R AL L PROCESSES ) DU E T O TH E EXTREMEL Y LO W AI R FLOW S AND/O R DIFFERENTIA L O F MAKE-U P T O EXHAUS T AI R FLO W RATIO S 

# i- J Plan t Anahei m Sout h Bosto n 3 River s Lancaste r Cordel e Elizabethtow n Moap a Tota l Gelcoa t % Styren e

1.825,71 8 1.042,25 5 1,435.18 2 1,424,17 7 1.450,50 5 1.285.82 3 1.367.46 8 1 0 926,14 6 3 6 %

3 6 % 3 6 % 3 6 % 3 6 % 3 6 % 3 6 % UE F

17.8 %

•' >:• « 17.6 % 17.8 % 17.8 % 178 % 1 7 8 % EMISSION S PERCEN T O F TOTA L EMISSION S Pound s o f Resi n Use d Emission s 324.97 8 185.S2 1 255.46 2 253,50 4 258,19 0 228.87 6 243.40 9 1,944.85 4 4 6 7 % Laminat e resi n 7,084,43 9 3,627,35 4 5.061,10 2 5.167.00 4 5,095,45 0 4.523,79 8 5.423.23 5 40528,72 0 % Styren e 4 2 6 % 3 9 0 % 390 % 426 % 3 9 0 % 42.6 % 36.0 % [Ma y 2000-Apri l 2001 ) ue f 4.5 % 4.5 % 4 5 % H U H 4 0 % Emission s

361.30 6 161,41 7 225,21 9 263,51 7 226.74 8 230.71 4 216.92 9 1 867,70 4 44.9 % B 3 5 •'•.•-

437,06 9 629,31 5 652,96 0 616,55 8 541,54 1 553.07 6 5.007.58 5 3 6 %

3 6 % 3 6 % 3 6 % 3 6 % 3 6 % 3 0 % U E F | Emission*., |

: 7.0 % 65.49 3 • •7.0% . 30,59 5 7 0 % 44.05 2

45.70 7 43.15 9 37,90 8 7 0% - 45.71 5 ToU l Emission s 751,77 7 377.53 3 524,73 3 562,72 8 528,09 6 497,49 8 506,05 4 35 0 53 1 4,163,08 9 | 8.4 % 100 % PLANT S WIT H PARTIA L CONTROL S gelcoate d product s onl y Plan t Sout h Bosto n Lancaste r Yel m Elizabethtow n Moap a Gelcoa t

1,042,25 5 1,424.17 7 1,095,01 8 1,285.82 3 1,367,46 8 Emission s

185.52 1 253.50 4 194.91 3 228,87 6 24 3 •: : • % Contro l Ne t Emission s

7 7 6 % 7 7 6 % 776 % 77.6 % 5 2 2 % 41.58 1

S6.81 7 43.68 6 51,29 8 19,08 3 Laminat e Resi n

3627,35 4 5,167,00 4 4,546,33 8 4.523.79 8 5.423.23 5 Emission s 161,41 7 263.51 7 181,85 4 230.71 4 216,92 9 % Contro l

4 6 1 % 46.1 % 2 3 0 % 46.1 % 9 2 2 % Ne t Emission s 8 7 03 5 14 2 08 8 139.95 4 124.40 1 17,00 7 .:"•• •'••;•• 652.95 0 541,44 8 541,54 1 30.59 5

45,70 7 3,:- - 90 1 37.90 8 653,07 8 45, 7 % Contro l •O0% . 0 0 % - -•0,0 % -77:e% . 92.2 % Ne t Emission s

3 0 59 ? 45.70 7 37,90 1 8,49 6 3.58 4 Tota l Emission s

159,21 2 244.61 3 221,54 1 184,19 5 39,67 5 % Controlle d

. 57.8 % 56.5 % * . 46.6 % 6 3 0 % 82.2 % Proces s Gelcoa t

Lam 1
L a m 2 Phas e Spra y Cu n Spra y Cur e Spra y Rol l Cur e Spra y Rol l Cur e Percen t

b y Phas e 6 7 % 3 3 % 6 7 % 3 3 % 5 0 % 2 5 % 2 5 % 5 0 % 2 5 % 2 5 %

Anahei m Sout h Bosto n 3 River s Lancaste r Cordel e Yel m Elizabethtow n Moap a Acryli c Resi n lbs/yea rFY200 1 n o acryh c manufacturin g 2,278.63 8 pound s n o acryli c manufacturin g n o acryli c manufacturin g n o acryli c manufacturin g 769,37 9 pound s n o acryli c manufacturin g n o acryli c manufacturin g Estimate d captur e Gelcoa t (Moapa ) Gelcoa t Barrie rCoa t (Moapa ) I f • Barrie rCoa t - 6 1s t Laminat e Resi n (Moapa ) 2nd/3r d Laminat e Resi n (Moapa ) 1s t Laminat e Resi n 2nd/3r d Laminat e Resi n Spra y 'j>m.XX.-. 9 6 % 96 % 96 % 9 6 % 9 6 % 9 6 % •yy. Rol l I*****) n a n a n a 9 6 % 9 6 % 0 % 0 % Cur e

96 % 5 0 % 9 6 % 50 % 9 6 % 96 % 0 % 0 % Tota l Captur e 9 6 0 % eo.B % 9 6 0 % 80.8 % 96.0 % 9 6 0 % 48.0 % 4 8 0 % % Destructio n 9 6 % 9 6 % 9 6 % 9 6 * 9 6 % 9 6 % 9 6 % 9 6 % Tota l % Controlle d 92.2 % 77,6 %
9 2 2 J t 9 2 2 % 46.1 % 4 6 1 %
1 METHO D 20 4 HA S NO T BEE N USE D T O DETERMIN E CAPTUR E EFFICIENCY . 2 DU E T O TH E PUSH/PUL L MAKE-U P AI R & EXHAUS T SYSTE M AN D TH E CONVEYO R METHO D O F MOVIN G PART S METHO D 20 4 COUL D NO T B E DESIGNE D INT O TH E PRODUCTIO N PROCES S UNLES S CONTROLLE D A T 100 % WIT H GREATE R AI R FLOW S 3 AL L FUGITIVE S AR E ESTIMATE D A T 4 % (FO R AL L PROCESSES ) DU E T O TH E EXTREMEL Y LO W AI R FLOW S AND/O R DIFFERENTIA L O F MAKE-U P T O EXHAUS T AI R FLO W RATIO S 4 TH E RT O @ YEL M I S ONL Y USE D A S NEEDE D T O STA Y BELO W CA P O F 24 9 TP Y 5 Acryli c resi n usag e fo raam e perio d • 2,278,63 8 lb s (Sout h Boston ) t 769,37 9 lb s (Yalm ) 

# I

6 Magnu m FI T equipmen t operationa l a t eac h plan t appro x Anahei m Sout h Bosto n 3 River s Lancaste r Cordel e Yel m Elizabethtow n Moap a DAT E Jul-0 0 Oct-0 1 Sep-0 1 Sep-0 1 Aug-0 2 May-0 1 Apr-0 1 Jul-0 0 Mixin g Typ e

Interna l Interna l Intema l Intema l Interna l Interna l Intema l Externa l

0 0Plan t Anahei m Sout h Bosto n 3 River s Lancaste r Cordel e Yel m Elizabethtow n Moap a Tota l EMISSION S PE F Gelcoa t

1.825,71 8 1,042,25 5 1.435,18 2 1,424,17 7 1,450.50 5 1,095,01 8 1.285.82 3 1.367.46 8 10.926,14 6 % Styren e

:- % 36 % 36 % 36 % 36 % 36 % 36 % 36 % UE F

17.8 % 17.8 % 17.8% 17.8 % 17.8% 17.8 % 17.8% 17.8% CENTOFTOTALEM.SSION S Pound s o f Resi n Use d (Ma y 200 0 - A Emission s 324,97 8 185.52 1 255,46 2 253.50 4 258,19 0 194.91 3 228.87 6 243.40 9 1 944.85 4 46.7 % Laminat e resi n

7.084.43 9 3,627,35 4 5,061.10 2 5,167.00 4 5.095,45 0 4.546,33 8 4.523,79 8 5,423,23 5 40.528.72 0 % Styren e

4 2 B % 3 9 0 % 39.0 % 426 % 3 9 0 % 36.0 % 42.6 % 3 6 0 % 4.5 %

4 5 % 4 5 % 4 0 % 4 0 % pri l 2001 )

Emission s 361,30 6 161,41 7 225.21 9 263,51 7 226,74 8 181,85 4 230,71 4 216,92 9 1,867,70 4 .44.9 % , 437,06 9

629,31 5 652,96 0 616.55 8 541,44 8 541.54 1 653,07 8 5.007,58 5 ''*•"•. ,

36 % 36 % 36 % 36 % 36 % 36 % 36 % UE F

• - 7.0 % k

- 7.0 % 65,49 3

30,59 5 44,05 2 45.70 7 43,15 9 37,90 1 37,90 8 45.71 5 Tota l Emission s I 751,77 7 377.53 3 524,73 3 562.72 8 528.09 6 414.66 8 497,49 8 506.05 4 35 0 53 1 4.163.08 9 [ _ 100 % - PLANT S WIT H P Sout h Bosto n Lancaste r Yel m Elizabethtow n Moap a ARTIA L CONT R

1,042,25 5 1.424,17 7 1.095.01 8 1,285,82 3 1,367,46 8 OL S gelcoa t

185,52 1 253,50 4 19 4 91 3 228.87 5 24 3 40 9 e d produ c a onl y

6 1 7 % 617 % 6 1 7 % 61.7 % 92.2 % 96.97 2

74,56 0 87,55 2 19.08 3 3,627,35 4

5,167,00 4 4 546,33 8 4.523.79 8 5.423.23 5 161,41 7

263,51 7 181,85 4 230.71 4 216,92 9 46.1 %

46.1 % 23.0 % 4 6 1 % 9 2 2 % 87.03 6

142.08 8 139,95 4 124,40 1 17,00 7 437,06 9

652,96 0 541,44 8 541,54 1 653.07 8 M I' ' •Hti'-V'-r l

45,70 7 1 45,70 7 37.90 1 37.90 1 37,908 ^^I^ H 14.50 1 45.71 5 ^^^^ | 188,59 8 - 50,0 % 284,76 8 v49.4 % 252,41 6 **. 39,1 % 226,45 3 • 54.5 % 39,67 5 * 92.2 % Proces s Gelcoa t

La m 1 La m 2 Phas e Spra y Cur e Spra y Cur e Spra y Rol l Cur e Spray Rol l Cur e Percen i

b y Phas e 67 % 33 % 67 % 33 % 50 % 25 % 25 % 50 % 25 % 25 %

Anahei m Sout h Bosto n 3 River s Lancaste r Cordel e Yel m Elizabethtow n Moap a Acryli c Resi n lbs/yea rFY200 1

n o acryli c manufaclurin g 2,278,63 8 pound s n o acryli c manufaclurin g n o acryli c manufacturin g n o acryli c manufacturin g 769,37 9 pound s n o acryli c manufaclurin g n o acryli c manufacturin g Estimate d captur e Gelcoa t (Moapa ) Gelcoa t '''Barrie rCoa t «P I 1s t Laminat e Resi n (Moapa ) 2nd/3r d Laminat e Resi n (Moapa ) 1s t Laminat e Resi n 2ndr3r d Laminat e Resi n Spra y 96 % 96 % 96 % 96 % 96 % 96 % 96 % 96 % Rol l

n a n a n a n a 96 % 96 % 0 % 0 % Cur e

96 % 96 % 96 % 96 % 0 % 0 % Tota l Captur e

96.0 % 64.3 % 9 6 0 % 64.3 % 9 6 0 % 9 6 0 % 48.0 % 4 8 0 % % Destructio n 96 $ 96 % 96 % 96 % 96 % 96 % 96 % 96 % Tota l % Controlle d

92.2 % 5 ! 7-Tm
-J2 2% 9 2 2 % 46.1 % 4 6 1 % 1 METHO D 204 HA S NO T BEE N USE D T O DETERMIN E CAPTUR E EFFICIENCY . 2 DU E T O TH E PUSH/PUL L MAKE-U P AI R & EXHAUS T SYSTE M AN D TH E CONVEYO R METHO D O F MOVIN G PART S METHO D 20 4 COUL D NO T B E DESIGNE D INT O TH E PRODUCTIO N PROCES S UNLES S CONTROLLE D A T 100 % WIT H GREATE R AI R FLOW S 3 AL L FUGITIVE S AR E ESTIMATE D A T 4 % (FO R AL L PROCESSES ) DU E T O TH E EXTREMEL Y LO W AI R FLOW S AND/O R DIFFERENTIA L O F MAKE-U P T O EXHAUS T AI R FLO W RATIO S 4 TH E RT O @ YEL M I S ONL Y USE O A S NEEDE O T O STA Y BELO W CA P O F 24 9 TP Y 5 Acryli c resi n usag e fo rsam e perio d = 2,278,63 8 lb s (Sout h Boston ) & 769,37 9 lb s (Yelm ) 6 Magnu m FI T equipmen t operationa l a t eac h plan t approx . Anahei m Sout h Bosto n 3 River s Lancaste r Cordel e Yel m Elizabethtow n Moap a OAT E Jul-0 0 Oct-0 1 Sep-0 1 Sep-0 1 Aug-0 2 May-0 1 Apr-0 1 Jul-0 0 Mixin g Typ e

Intema l Interna l Intema l Interna l Intema l Intema l Interna l Externa lP.7 0



### ATTACHMEN

T M Ne w Facilit y Surve y Tabl e Preparedby Alaglas s Pool s



## (a°\

### 2* 7



### - J 

### o Facilit

y Nam e an dLocation : fJ»V*g-c

\ \ g.s*a > 

# p«>*> u Hour s of Operation : Yea r fo r Whic h DataI s Bein g Reported : 2-0£ * I 

### •5 " fcfr* jid&k.V- NEW FACILIT Y SURVE Y TABL E Proces s Groupin g Example s Ope n molding , mechanica

l Ope n molding , mechanical , non-corrosio n resistant , fille

d 

### Materia l
pigmentedge

l coa t viny l este r resi n

iASt G*C
- CApfC 

### Quantit y Used (tpy )
500 100 0 

## 32MHO q €. (cnS (^Z . to<& Averag e HAP

Content (wt . % )
4 6 32-3 7



## MM-****/ • 

# 3s-y 0 

### Applicatio n

Techniqu e
spra y mechanical , non-atomize d (100% ) 

### Othe rEmissio n

Reductio n Techniqu e

none incinerator (90 % overal l captur e an dcontrol )



### UfeCtt / AM U - ^

• 

### Mjvie _



## finrvte . Colo r

(gel coat only ) offwhit e N A 

## totfrnt t^A M/ AP.7 2



### ATTACHMEN

T N Ne w Facilit y Surve y Table Fo r Fabwel l Sen t B y R . Berge

r to Ke n Meardo n 4/8/0 2

1\P.7 3 

## B f FABRICATIN G mm. SOLUTION S 1871 0 Mapl e at y Driv e Phone - (574 ) 534-344 7 Goshen . I n 4682 6 Fax - (574 ) 534424 6 

# Fa x

Phone : .'jjfjrTH ' ^2arf=aW^ife - Date : Fax ; 9/ 9 - 9V /

- ^ - a g V Pages ; Wit h Cove r_ ^



## 7"* -

### Facilit

y Nam e aii dLocatioa : /-&& W^~. /y^RHx^L/jr^ryx/Q^^^/^i-r-^^< Hours o f Operation : Yea r fo r Whic h Dat aI s Being Reported : Z^>& / o O s 

### NE W FACILIT

Y SURVE

Y TABLE

a i
Q . •_z a u U l 3 ffl • I u .

( M O O C M O D Q I Q : Q . c c Proces s Groupin g Bxampf w Ope n molding , mechanica l Ope n molding , mechanical , non-corrosio n resistant , tille d

Qpemfm M»!*i.j ^ M a ferial

pigmente d ge l coa l viny l este rresi n

?*ln<mmSTe_r ~ f P 74yn-e_KrteJl Quantity

Use d ((py )

SO O 100 0 

## ZHT/.7I 8Sf.S7 

# H% tf Averag e HA P

Conten t (wt . % )

4 6 32-3 7 

## 2/7* 1 ZC * 3U.11 Applicatio n

Techniqu e

spra y mechanical , non-atomize d

(100% )

^GCWWmTizAL /lT-OA\jrz^> A\£C_MANJT£/I£_ Othe rEmissio n Reduction Techniqu e

non e in c in erato r(90 % overal l captur e an d control ) Colo r

(ge tcoa t only ) '
ofhvhit s N A 

## A/ 4 Q&Wffc&m. 

### 4&2*mz C O *. o IS 3 tmm.

• z o

o o c nP.7 5



### ATTACHMEN

T 0 New Facilit

y Surve y Table fo r Kohle r Spartanbur

g Sen t B y Mik e Cassid y to Ke n Meardon 4/10/0 2



# 7< fP.7 6



### Apri l 10,200 2

Mr . Kennet

h R . Meardon PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTA L SERVICES , INC Researc h Triangl e Park , NC 2770 9 Dea r Ken : Subject : RPC MAC

T QUESTIONNAIR

E Fo r Kohle r Co.' s - Spartanburg . S C Facilit v Attache di s atable providing th e information requeste di n you r Marc h 27 , 200 2 fa

x to m e fo r Kohle r Co.' s Spartanburg , S C RP

C fixtur e fabrication facility . Thi s facilit y operate s a

n FR P fixtur e plan t an da n acryli c fixtur

e plant . I hav e listedth e operating hour s fo r each plant separately . Th e gelcoa t resin s an dtoolin g resin s liste dar

e attributabl e t o th e FR

P plant only . The bonding resi n liste di s attributabl e t o th e acryli c plan

t only . The general-purpos e chop coa t resi n liste drepresent s th e tota

l use din boot

h plants . If you hav e an

y question s abou

t thi s information , I ma

y b e contacte da

t 920-457-4441 , extension 77263 , o

r vi ae-mail a

t mike.cassidy(a),kohler.com .

Sincerely , Mik e Cassid y Kohle r Co . Enclosur e



## 15Facilit

y Nam e andLocation : Kohle

r Co . - Spartanburg . S C Yea r fo r Whic h Dat aI s Bein g Reported : 200 1 Hour s o f Operation : FRP Fixture Plant : 8.040 hr s

Acrvli c Fixture Plant : 2.12 8 hr s 

### FACILIT Y SURVE Y TABL E

Proces s Groupin g Example s Ope n molding , mechanica

l Ope n molding , mechanical , non-corrosio n resistant , filled Ope n Molding : mechanica l Ope n molding : filled, Non-corrosion , mechanica

l Ope n molding : filled, non-corrosion , mechanica

l Toolin g resin : mechanica l Materia l pigmente dgel coa

t viny l este r resi n Pigmente dge l coa t Genera l purpos e cho p coa t resi n Acryli c fixtur e bondin g resi n Orang e toolin g resi n Quantit y Use d (tpy ) 500

100 0 60 0 295 0 14 5 0. 2 Averag e HA P

Conten t (wt . % ) 4 6

32-3 7 35.4-39. 5 36-4 0 45-4 8 4 7 Applicatio n Techniqu e spra y mechanical , non atomized(100% ) Spra y (100% ) Mechanical , non atomized(impingemen

t guns ) (100% ) Mechanical , non atomize d(impingemen

t guns ) (100% ) Spra y (100% ) Othe rEmissio n Reductio n Techniqu e
non e incinerato r

(90 % overal l captur e andcontrol ) non e

non e

non e

non e Colo r (ge l coa t only ) Ofrwhit e

N A All colors , includin g whit e N A N A Orang e\ l Proces s Groupin g

Toolin g resin : manua l Materia l Iso-toolin g resi n Quantit y Use d (tpy ) 1. 5 Averag e HA P

Conten t (wt . % ) 4 7 Applicatio n

Techniqu e Han dlayu p (100% ) Othe rEmissio n Reductio n Techniqu e non e Colo r (ge l coa t only ) N AP.7 9



### ATTACHMEN

T P Surve y of Hours of Operation Preparedby Ke

n Odett e (CFA ) 1/18/0 2



## 7? rP.8 0

RF P Facilitie s fo r whic h Hour s o f Operatio n Ar e Neede d 1/18/0 2

Facility Nam e |C*l y |Slat a |Contac t Nam * (i f availaole ) Numbe r Aqu a Bat h C o , In c Attba r Plastics , In a Bathcraft , Inc . Breme n Glas , Inc . Co r Te c Co . Custo m Fibreglas s Manufactunn g C o Dixie-Pacifi c Manufacturin g C o E D Industries , Inc . (Sportsma n Picku p Covers ) Elje r Plumbingware Emsi g Manufacturin g Cor p i bercas t C o Fiberglas s Systems , In c Fiber-Tec h Industries , Inc , Fleetwoo d (formerl y Gol d Shield ) G . W . Fiberglass , Inc . Nashvill e T N Georg e McAllister-relire d Mik e Mora n Vancouve r W A Jo e Vol z Valdosi a Breme n Washingto n Cour

t House Lon g Beac h Gadsde n Rogersvlll e Wilso n Ne wYor k San d Spring s Bois a Pendleto n Fontan a O'falkx i Glasg o Plastics , In c Springfiel d Holida y Ramble r Corp. , Plan l 3 6 an d 3 7 I Wakarus a Jaso n Industries , Inc . Lee r Midwes

t McCtarf n Plastic s in c Miracl e Recreatio n C o Nationa l Fibe rGlas s Product s In c S.W C Industries , In c (Swirl-Way Div. ) Shakespeare Co . Sherma n Pole s Specialt y Plastic s Associates . In o Synlechnic s (Trinit

y Marine ) Unite d Technologie s Moto r System s Universal-Rundl e Corp . Universal-Rundl e Cor p Universal-Rundl e Corp . FACILITIE S T O AD D T O DATABAS E Prodesig n MAAXUS A Pear l Manufacturin g (MAAX ) Kohle r Elkhar t Elkhar t Hanove r Monet t Romeovill e Henderso n Newberr y Estil l Lakelan d Paduca h Columbu s Ne wCastl e Ottumw a Unio n Poin t G A Ui m Kutzl i I N O H C A A L Mar k

Smith , Jo

e Prio r Rober t Edward s Glen n Tipto n M O |Mlk

e Downi e (Consultant-Brittne y Inc. ) N C | Phi l Livermore N Y ! Timoth y Haskin s - n o longe r ther a O KMichae l Thaye r I D S C C A M O O H I N I N I N P A M O I L T X S C S C F L K Y M S P A I A G A j Valdost a G A Spartanbur g S C Larr y Bearg , Gar

y Multane n Mar k Howar d Willia m Tillma n Kur t Anderso n Joh n Blm e Kevi n Park

s (Consultant ) Kar l Kat z Terr y Branso n Kell y Salac h Da n Winfrey Joh n Pric e J.W . Duboi s C . Denni s Pee k

(Consultant ) Meliss a Wright n o longe r there(Plant) ; To m Sho w(Corporate ) D Pierc e Epe s Rober t Walcza k

- n o longe r there Jo e Perdu e (Env , Coord) . Bil l Polzi n (Plan t Mgr ) Donal d Elli s ttMG>-3580 912-333-080! , 514-335-9400 . 614 - 3KM32-A45 4 256-442-451 3 417-833-505 0 (plan t #417-753-6688 ) 252-247-238 4 518-826730 1 918-245^65 1 20 8 342-682 3 909-351-390 5 51 3 326-360 2 219-862-734 7 219-294-759 5 219-25 8 077, " 717-937-224 1 417-235-691 7 x25 2 708-257-330 0 903-65 7 -143 6 803-276-550 4 5-313 1 813-968-772 2 270-898-7303/901 - 853-245 0 601-245-436 7 724-658-668 6 641-682-851 5 706-486-413 3

Hira m Rivf- m 229-247-236 4 x22 7 Plan t Operatin g Hours 7 hou rshift/5 day s pe rwea k (*>am-4pm/

5 day s [Hi rwee k n o contac t informatio n ba d phon a number s dtaconneeta d left messag e disconnecte d medica l offic e phon e numb * plan l cease d o i i 1 shrft/5- 6 day s pe r wea k 7am-4pm/4- 5 <1*iy* . pa i wo.; k WTOn g numbe i .nm/5day a pe r wee k lef t messag e 1 shitt/5 day a pe l *• * disconnecte d Branso n n o longe r there , lef t ms g ba d phon a numb * No w Mansfiel d Plumbing , lef t messag e lef t messag e ba d phon e numbe r 6am-430pm/ 4 day s pe r wee k ba d phon e numbo r 1 shift/ 5 day s pe r wee k 6am- 2 30pm/

5 day s pe r wee k 7am- 4 30pm/

5 day s pe r wee k



# 1°\