alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

House Calendar No. 202 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 3428 

[Report No. 108–595] 

To designate a portion of the United States courthouse located at 2100 

Jamieson Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia, as the ‘‘Justin W. Williams 

United States Attorney’s Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2003 

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia (for himself, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. COBLE, Mr. SCHROCK, Mr. WOLF, Mrs. JO ANN

DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. FORBES, Mr. 

BOUCHER, Mr. GOODE, and Mr. SCOTT of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

JULY 12, 2004 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To designate a portion of the United States courthouse located at 2100 Jamieson Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia, 

as the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United States Attorney’s 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3428 RH 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The building and structure de3 scribed in subsection (b) shall be known and designated 

4 as the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United States Attorney’s 

5 Building’’. 

6 (b) DESCRIPTION.—The building and structure to be 

7 designated under subsection (a) is that portion of the 

8 United States courthouse located at 2100 Jamieson Ave9 nue, in Alexandria, Virginia (known as the Albert V. 

10 Bryan United States Courthouse), that is attached to the 

11 courthouse main tower structure, described as A-Wing in 

12 the architectural plans, and currently occupied by the Of13 fice of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District 

14 of Virginia, Alexandria Division. 

15 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

16 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

17 paper, or other record of the United States to the building 

18 and structure described in section 1(b) shall be deemed 

19 to be a reference to the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United States 

20 Attorney’s Building’’. 

21 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

22 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

23 as may be necessary for appropriate identifying designa24 tions to be affixed to the building and structure described 

25 in section 1(b) and for an appropriate plaque reflecting 

26 the designation and honoring Justin W. Williams and his 
3 

•HR 3428 RH 

1 service to the Nation to be affixed to or displayed in such 

2 building and structure. 
House Calendar No. 202 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 3428 

[Report No. 108–595] 

A BILL 

To designate a portion of the United States courtUnited States Attorney’s Building’’. andria, Virginia, as the ‘‘Justin W. Williams house located at 2100 Jamieson Avenue, in AlexJULY 12, 2004 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
§ 151.26 Procedures: Applications; compatible land use information; consideration of local community interest; relocation of displaced persons. ( a ) Each sponsor must state in its application the action that it has taken to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations including landing and take-off of aircraft. The sponsor's statement must include information on— ( 1 ) Any property interests (such as airspace easements or title to airspace) acquired by the sponsor to assure compatible land use, or to protect or control aerial approaches;
( 2 ) Any zoning laws enacted or in force restricting the use of land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the airport, or assuring protection or control of aerial approaches, whether or not enacted by the sponsor; and
( 3 ) Any action taken by the sponsor to induce the appropriate government authority to enact zoning laws restricting the use of land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the airport, or assuring protection or control of aerial approaches, when the sponsor lacks the power to zone the land.
( b ) Each sponsor must submit with his application— ( 1 ) A written statement— ( i ) Specifying what consideration has been given to the interest of all communities in or near which the project is located; and
( ii ) Containing the substance of any objection to, or approval of, the proposed project made known to the sponsor by any local individual, group or community; and
( 2 ) A written statement showing that adequate replacement housing that is open to all persons, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, is available and has been offered on the same nondiscriminatory basis to persons who have resided on land physically acquired or to be acquired for the project development and who will be displaced thereby.
[Amdt. 151-8, 30 FR 8039, June 23, 1965, as amended by Amdt. 151-17, 31 FR 16524, Dec. 28, 1966; Amdt. 151-39, 35 FR 5537, Apr. 3, 1970]
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3733

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Altamont, Kansas, as the ‘‘Myron V. George al Service located at 410 Huston Street in

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3733

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 410 Huston Street in Altamont, Kansas, as

the ‘‘Myron V. George Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3733 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 410 Huston Street in Altamont, Kansas, shall

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Myron V. George Post

5 Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Myron V. George Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 16,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,869,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                (2,217,447)
<INVENTORY>                                    622,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,486,367
<PP&E>                                       9,586,070
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,819,802)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,539,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,709,128
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       258,023
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,572,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,539,727
<SALES>                                     35,797,641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,797,641
<CGS>                                       25,047,897
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,546,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                41,628
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             287,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (17,126,118)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (17,126,118)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (14,447,611)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (31,573,729)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.27)


</TABLE>
#### Hastings *v.*Hastings.

No. 8923.

October 13, 1932.

Bell, *J.*

1. Allegations in a caveat to the probate of a will, “that the deceased had been insane for six or seven years prior to his death, was insane at the time the alleged will was signed, if he ever signed it, and that said alleged will is only the will” of named beneficiaries and “ought not to be probated as the will” of the alleged testator, and that the caveatrix had paid the funeral expenses of the decedent without any knowledge that the named chief beneficiaries “had had decedent make a will giving them everything‘he had, if he ever signed the will,” were insufficient to present any issue as to fraud or undue influence. Nor did the caveat contain other allegations sufficient to raise either of these issues. *Field*v. *Brantley,*139 *Ga.*437 (3) (77 S. E. 559)*; Bohler*v. *Hicks,*120 *Ga.*800 (6) (48 S. E. 306).

2. The only issues raised by the caveat being whether the testator had sufficient mental capacity to execute a will, and whether he was laboring under a mistake of fact as to the conduct of his wife (the caveatrix), who was his sole heir at law; and there being no evidence of fraud or undue influence, the trial judge erred in charging the jury upon the latter subjects. *Edenfield*v. *Boyd,*143 *Ga.*95 (3) (84 S. E. 436).

3. Where instructions are given that are not warranted by the evidence and are calculated to mislead and confuse the jury, the error requires a new trial. *Central Georgia Power Co.*v. *Cornwell,*139 *Ga.*1 *(2 a)*(76 S. E. 387, Ann. Cas. 1914A, 880). The jury in the present case having found a verdict in favor of the caveatrix and against the probate of the will, the error in the charge as indicated was apparently harmful to the propounder, and a new trial should have been granted.

4. The admission of the evidence referred to in the amendment to the motion for a new trial was not erroneous for any reason stated in the objection thereto.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except AtlUnson, J., absent.*

*806
      *Ripley &*Bailey, for plaintiff.

*V. E. Adams*and *A. G. Minhinnett,*for defendant.
#### § 1264.110 Referral of complaint and answer to the presiding officer.

Upon receipt of an answer, the reviewing official shall file the complaint and answer with the presiding officer, and include the name and address of the attorney who will represent the authority before the presiding officer.
EXHIBIT 99.4


                 Master Servicer's Sarbanes-Oxley Certification
                       (1998 Transactions - 1999 Reports)

                   BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.,
                       MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES,
                      SERIES SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT I HERETO

            I, Gary K. Bettin, a Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A.,
certify that:

1.    I have reviewed the annual reports on Form 10-K for the calendar year 1999
      and all reports on Form 8-K containing the statements to
      certificateholders set forth in Section 4.03(b) of the Pooling and
      Servicing Agreements listed on Exhibit I hereto (the "Distribution Date
      Statements") filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by
      such annual reports of the trusts (each, a "Trust") formed pursuant to
      such Pooling and Servicing Agreements;

2.    Based on my knowledge, with respect to each Trust, the information in
      these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by such
      annual report; and

3.    Based on my knowledge, the servicing information required to be provided
      to the trustee by each master servicer under each Pooling and Servicing
      Agreement for inclusion in the related Trust's Distribution Date
      Statements is included in these reports.


                                        BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
                                           as Master Servicer


                                        By:/s/ Gary K. Bettin
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Gary K. Bettin
                                           Title: Senior Vice President

<PAGE>

         PARTIES TO AGREEMENT              DATE OF AGREEMENT        SERIES
================================================================================

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    April 1, 1998               1998-1
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
of California

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    May 1, 1998                 1998-2
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
of California

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    June 1, 1998                1998-3
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    July 1, 1998                1998-4
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    September 1, 1998           1998-5
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    November 1, 1998            1998-6
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    December 1, 1998            1998-7
Inc., Bank of America, N.A., BA
Mortgage, LLC and The Bank of New York
§ 652.50 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions will apply: *AgVantage Plus* means both the product by that name used by Farmer Mac and other similarly structured program volume that Farmer Mac might finance in the future under other names. Those AgVantage securities with initial principal amounts under $25 million and whose issuers were part of the original AgVantage program are excluded from this definition.
*Farmer Mac, Corporation, you, and your* means the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and its affiliates as defined in subpart A of this part.
*Our, us, or we* means the Farm Credit Administration.
*Regulatory capital* means the sum of the following as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles: ( 1 ) The par value of outstanding common stock;
( 2 ) The par value of outstanding preferred stock;
( 3 ) Paid-in capital, which is the amount of owner investment in Farmer Mac in excess of the par value of stock;
( 4 ) Retained earnings; and,
( 5 ) Any allowances for losses on loans and guaranteed securities.
*Risk-based capital* means the amount of regulatory capital sufficient for Farmer Mac to maintain positive capital during a 10-year period of stressful conditions as determined by the risk-based capital stress test described in § 652.65.
*Rural utility guarantee fee* means the actual guarantee fee charged for off-balance sheet volume and the earnings spread over Farmer Mac's funding costs for on-balance sheet volume on rural utility loans.
[71 FR 77253, Dec. 26, 2006, as amended at 76 FR 23467, Apr. 27, 2011]
§ 151.53 Performance of construction work: Labor requirements. A sponsor who is required to include in a construction contract the labor provisions required by § 151.49 shall require the contractor to comply with those provisions and shall cooperate with the FAA in effecting that compliance. For this purpose the sponsor shall— ( a ) Keep, and preserve, for a three-year period beginning on the date the contract is completed, each affidavit and payroll copy furnished by the contractor, and make those affidavits and copies available to the FAA, upon request, during that period;
( b ) Have each of those affidavits and payrolls examined by its resident engineer (or any other of its employees or agents who are qualified to make the necessary determinations), as soon as possible after receiving it, to the extent necessary to determine whether the contractor is complying with the labor provisions required by § 151.49 and particularly with respect to whether the contractor's employees are correctly classified;
( c ) Have investigations made during the performance of work under the contract, to the extent necessary to determine whether the contractor is complying with those labor provisions, particularly with respect to whether the contractor's employees are correctly classified, including in the investigations, interviews with employees and examinations of payroll information at the work site by the sponsor's resident engineer (or any other of its employees or agents who are qualified to make the necessary determinations); and
( d ) Keep the Area Manager fully advised of all examinations and investigations made under this section, all determinations made on the basis of those examinations and investigations, and all efforts made to obtain compliance with the labor provisions of the contract.
For the purposes of paragraph (c) of this section, the sponsor shall give priority to complaints of alleged violations, and shall treat as confidential any written or oral statements made by any employee. The sponsor may not disclose an employee's statement to a contractor without the employee's consent.
#### § 125.163 Fire-extinguishing agents.

Only methyl bromide, carbon dioxide, or another agent that has been shown to provide equivalent extinguishing action may be used as a fire-extinguishing agent. If methyl bromide or any other toxic extinguishing agent is used, provisions must be made to prevent harmful concentrations of fluid or fluid vapors from entering any personnel compartment either because of leakage during normal operation of the airplane or because of discharging the fire extinguisher on the ground or in flight when there is a defect in the extinguishing system. If a methyl bromide system is used, the containers must be charged with dry agent and sealed by the fire-extinguisher manufacturer or some other person using satisfactory recharging equipment. If carbon dioxide is used, it must not be possible to discharge enough gas into the personnel compartments to create a danger of suffocating the occupants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              7
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                  707,199
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                    0
<EQUITIES>                             20,351
<MORTGAGE>                             0
<REAL-ESTATE>                          0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                         833,115
<CASH>                                 15,688
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                     5,857
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                 36,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,275,920
<POLICY-LOSSES>                        868,147
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                    180,891
<POLICY-OTHER>                         0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                  0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               147
<OTHER-SE>                             271,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,275,920
<PREMIUMS>                             77,807
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                    11,893
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                     721
<OTHER-INCOME>                         15
<BENEFITS>                             45,674
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>            15,951
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                   9,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        16,848
<INCOME-TAX>                           4,944
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    11,904
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                           11,904
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .76
<RESERVE-OPEN>                         373,606
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                    48,332
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                      0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                     1,098
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                       37,136
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                        380,580
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                3,124

        

</TABLE>
§ 136.41 Interim operating authority. ( a ) *General.* Upon application for operating authority, the Administrator shall grant interim operating authority under this section to a commercial air tour operator for commercial air tour operations over a national park or tribal land for which the operator is an existing commercial air tour operator.
( b ) *Requirements and limitations.* Interim operating authority granted under this section— ( 1 ) Shall provide annual authorization only for the greater of— ( i ) The number of flights used by the operator to provide the commercial air tour operations within the 12-month period prior to April 5, 2000; or
( ii ) The average number of flights per 12-month period used by the operator to provide such operations within the 36-month period prior to April 5, 2000, and for seasonal operations, the number of flights so used during the season or seasons covered by that 12-month period;
( 2 ) May not provide for an increase in the number of commercial air tour operations conducted during any time period by the commercial air tour operator above the number the air tour operator was originally granted unless such an increase is agreed to by the Administrator and the Director;
( 3 ) Shall be published in the Federal Register to provide notice and opportunity for comment;
( 4 ) May be revoked by the Administrator for cause;
( 5 ) Shall terminate 180 days after the date on which an air tour management plan is established for the park and tribal lands;
( 6 ) Shall promote protection of national park resources, visitor experiences, and tribal lands;
( 7 ) Shall promote safe commercial air tour operations;
( 8 ) Shall promote the adoption of quiet technology, as appropriate, and
( 9 ) Shall allow for modifications of the interim operating authority based on experience if the modification improves protection of national park resources and values and of tribal lands.
( c ) *New entrant operators.* The Administrator, in cooperation with the Director, may grant interim operating authority under this paragraph (c) to an air tour operator for a national park or tribal lands for which that operator is a new entrant air tour operator if the Administrator determines the authority is necessary to ensure competition in the provision of commercial air tour operations over the park or tribal lands. ( 1 ) *Limitation.* The Administrator may not grant interim operating authority under this paragraph (c) if the Administrator determines that it would create a safety problem at the park or on the tribal lands, or if the Director determines that it would create a noise problem at the park or on the tribal lands.
( 2 ) *ATMP limitation.* The Administrator may grant interim operating authority under this paragraph (c) only if the ATMP for the park or tribal lands to which the application relates has not been developed within 24 months after April 5, 2000.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-8690, 67 FR 65667, Oct. 25, 2002. Redesignated by Amdt. 136-1, 72 FR 6912, Feb. 13, 2007]