alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021006EN.01001101.xml

| 8.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10089 — Phillips 66/Fortress Investment Group/Pester Marketing)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 6/09)

On 23 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10089. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10089. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-41013 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KHURRAN AHMED SHAH, also known as Bobby; BABAR SHAH, Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:92-CR-7-14

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendants appeal the denial of their motions to reconsider the denial of the Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosely v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). The defendants’ motions to reconsider were untimely because they were not filed within ten days of the entry of theNo. 96-41013 -2- district court's order denying the Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. United States v. Miramontez , 995 F.2d 56, 58 n.2 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the district court was without jurisdiction to consider the motions. Because the defendants filed "unauthorized” motions, they have appealed from the denial of “meaningless, unauthorized” motions. United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). This court affirms on the alternative basis. Id
. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ron Howell, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                        Date: August 14, 2008

                                        \s\ Ron Howell
                                        --------------
                                        Ron Howell
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
§ 135.393 Large nontransport category airplanes: Landing limitations: Destination airports. ( a ) No person operating a large nontransport category airplane may take off that airplane at a weight that— ( 1 ) Allowing for anticipated consumption of fuel and oil, is greater than the weight that would allow a full stop landing within 60 percent of the effective length of the most suitable runway at the destination airport; and
( 2 ) Is greater than the weight allowable if the landing is to be made on the runway— ( i ) With the greatest effective length in still air; and
( ii ) Required by the probable wind, taking into account not more than 50 percent of the headwind component or not less than 150 percent of the tailwind component.
( b ) For the purpose of this section, it is assumed that— ( 1 ) The airplane passes directly over the intersection of the obstruction clearance plane and the runway at a height of 50 feet in a steady gliding approach at a true indicated airspeed of at least 1.3 Vso;
( 2 ) The landing does not require exceptional pilot skill; and
( 3 ) The airplane is operating in standard atmosphere.
<PAGE>



                                   Exhibit 15

                           Accountants' Acknowledgment

First Brands Corporation
83 Wooster Heights Road
Danbury, CT  06813-1911

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 RE: FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENTS NO. 33-35770, NO. 33-56992,
     NO. 33-56503 AND NO. 333-56503

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we  acknowledge  our
awareness of the use therein of our reports dated  November 4, 1996 and February
4, 1997 related to our reviews of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933,  such reports are not
considered  part  of a  registration  statement  prepared  or  certified  by  an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                                    Very truly yours,

                                                    /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

New York, New York
February 14, 1997




<PAGE>
Exhibit 19

Dear TreeSource Shareholders:

         For the second  quarter of Fiscal  1999,  TreeSource(R)  incurred a net
loss of  $324,000,  compared  to a net loss of  $198,000  for the same period in
1997. The net loss applicable to common  shareholders was $.08 per share for the
quarter ended October 31, 1998 compared to $.07 per share in the second  quarter
last year.  Second  quarter net sales were $51.2  million,  down 24 percent from
$67.4 million in the comparable period last year.

         For the six months ended October 31, 1998,  the Company  reported a net
loss of $943,000  compared to net income of $1,746,000  for the same period last
year. The net loss applicable to common  shareholders was $.19 per share for the
six months ended  October 31, 1998  compared to net income  applicable to common
shareholders  of $.05 per share for the same  period  last year.  Net sales were
$98.9 million for the six months  compared to $136.3  million in the prior year,
down 27 percent.

         The second fiscal  quarter  started off  profitably,  but lumber prices
slid as the quarter  progressed.  During the quarter some product prices fell as
much as 30%,  and  compared  to last  year,  product  prices  overall  were  off
significantly.  Despite the low lumber prices,  the Company's  operating results
were slightly better than the same quarter last year.

          In spite of strong domestic  demand,  weak export markets  resulted in
too much of the  industry's  output to be  directed  to the US market.  The chip
market is also weak because of the negative  impact of the Asian flu on pulp and
paper  producers.  Although  the lumber and chip  market  softness  has caused a
decline in log costs, the reductions at this point have not been enough to allow
consistently profitable operations.

         Short  term,  we  are  running  our  most   efficient   facilities  and
concentrating  on improving our lumber business by more tightly  integrating log
acquisition,  mill operations,  and sales activities with rigorous financial and
operational  analyses  to  maximize  results.  We also  intend  to sell  certain
non-strategic assets.

         The delisting  proceedings with Nasdaq are still pending and a decision
is expected this month.

         During our Annual  Meeting of  Shareholders  held on October 26,  1998,
Directors  Richard W.  Detweiler and William H. Wright were  re-elected to three
year terms and Moss Adams LLP was re-appointed as the Company's  auditors.  Also
during the  meeting,  proposals  to change  the  Company  name to  TreeSource(R)
Industries, Inc. and to amend the Company's Stock Option Plan were approved.

                                       Jess R. Drake
                                       President


                                       55
Editorial Note on Part 11
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

§ 11.21 What are the most common kinds of rulemaking actions for which FAA follows the Administrative Procedure Act? FAA follows the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) procedures for these common types of rules: ( a ) Rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations;
( b ) Airworthiness directives issued under part 39 of this chapter; and
( c ) Airspace Designations issued under various parts of this chapter.
# Official Journal C 304A/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 304A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5015 December 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 304A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5015 December 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 304A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 26th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 304A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 26th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 135.349 Flight attendants: Initial and transition ground training. Initial and transition ground training for flight attendants must include instruction in at least the following— ( a ) General subjects— ( 1 ) The authority of the pilot in command; and
( 2 ) Passenger handling, including procedures to be followed in handling deranged persons or other persons whose conduct might jeopardize safety.
( b ) For each aircraft type— ( 1 ) A general description of the aircraft emphasizing physical characteristics that may have a bearing on ditching, evacuation, and inflight emergency procedures and on other related duties;
( 2 ) The use of both the public address system and the means of communicating with other flight crewmembers, including emergency means in the case of attempted hijacking or other unusual situations; and
( 3 ) Proper use of electrical galley equipment and the controls for cabin heat and ventilation.
#### § 125.325 Instrument approach procedures and IFR landing minimums.

Except as specified in § 91.176 of this chapter, no person may make an instrument approach at an airport except in accordance with IFR weather minimums and unless the type of instrument approach procedure to be used is listed in the certificate holder's operations specifications.

[Docket FAA-2013-0485, Amdt. 125-66, 81 FR 90176, Dec. 13, 2016]
# DEPARTMENT:

 United States Department of State. 

# ACTION:

 Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                         Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and                         Start Printed Page 2669                        Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority of October 19, 1999, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “The Topkapi Palace: Jewels and Treasures of the Sultans,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Corcoran Gallery of Art, the San Diego Museum of Art and the Fort Lauderdale Museum of Art from on or about March 1, 2000, to on or about October 15, 2001, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Carol Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-619-6981). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44; 301-4th Street, S.W., Room 700, Washington, D.C. 20547-0001.

Dated: January 9, 2000. 

William B. Bader, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State.

[FR Doc. 00-1076 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

# RECE\VED

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

## AUG 15 2m4 

## HEARING DOCKET

v. JOHN WALSH,Complainant,

Respondent. FAA Case No: 2014S0190111



## ________________________

## ; RESPONDENT'S HEARING REQUEST Respondent, JOHN WALSH, by and through his undersigned attorney, pursuant to 14 CFR 13.16 and 14 CFR 13.210, herewith requests a hearing on the Administrator's Final Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty, dated july 25,2014.

Stuart A. Goldstein, P. A. 7300 North Kendall Drive, Suite 380 Miami, FL 33156 Tel: (305) 670-1222 Fax: (305) 400-0685 Email: stuartgoldsteinpa@att.net !i 

### (! ,j 11

### +-~-='**/** 

## rh;, · 

## lu By: 

### xf XJ .\

### ~,rJ

### d**?:c•uc<I•VN;-~'** StuartA. Goldstein Attorneyfor Respondent2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 11th day ofAugust, 2014, the original and one copy of this Request was served via United States mail on: Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S. W., Washington, D. 

### C., 20591; attention Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000, and tbat a copy was served via facsimile (404) 305-5223 and regular U.S. Mail upon Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq., Office of the Regional Counsel, 1700 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337.

' By: 

## A\;\")1\

# <M,\;;c1'rlt1t:_
__ •
· StuartA. Goldstein
#### § 121.925 Recordkeeping requirements.

Each certificate holder conducting an approved AQP must establish and maintain records in sufficient detail to demonstrate the certificate holder is in compliance with all the requirements of the AQP and this subpart.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                      JURISDICTION OF
NAME                                                   INCORPORATION
------------------------------------------            ---------------
<S>                                                   <C>
Caystar Holdings                                      Cayman Islands

Bogoso Holdings                                       Cayman Islands

Bogoso Gold Limited  (90% owned)                      Ghana

Wasford Holdings                                      Cayman Islands

Wexford Goldfields Limited (90% owned)                Ghana

GSR (IOM) Limited                                     Isle of Man

Barnex (Ghana) Limited                                Ghana

Barnex (Prestea) Limited (90% owned)                  Ghana

JCI Ghana                                             Ghana

Guyanor Ressources S.A. (72.6% owned)                 France

Societe de Travaux Publics et de Mines                France
Auriferes en Guyane ("SOTRAPMAG")

Societe des Mines de Yaou & Dorlin                    France
(SMYD)(86.3%)
</Table>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Pegasus Aviation LLC
Charles Morgan
19991 E. Elaine Circle
Queen Creek, AZ
85142
602-369-7421
charlie.pegasus@live.com
# C_2004138EN.01002501.xml

| 18.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/25

---

NOTICE OF SELECTION PROCEDURE

(2004/C 138/14)

The Secretariat of the European Parliament is organising the following selection procedure:

| PE/87/S | â€” | TEMPORARY MEMBERS OF STAFF - ADMINISTRATORS (A*8/AD8)
  Parliamentary assistance / research and documentation in the area of environmental science, telecommunications and scientific and technological options assessment
  (Scientific Policy Department) (1) |
| --- | --- | --- |

PE/87/S

â€”

TEMPORARY MEMBERS OF STAFF - ADMINISTRATORS (A*8/AD8)

Parliamentary assistance / research and documentation in the area of environmental science, telecommunications and scientific and technological options assessment

(Scientific Policy Department) (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ C A, 18/05/2004 (published in French, English and German)

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3739 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3739

To provide for matching funds waivers for formula grants and subgrants 
         under the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2020

  Mr. Casey (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for matching funds waivers for formula grants and subgrants 
         under the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Our Women and Waive 
Emergency Requirements Act'' or the ``POWER Act''.

SEC. 2. MATCHING FUNDS WAIVER FOR FORMULA GRANTS AND SUBGRANTS UNDER 
              THE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SERVICES ACT.

    (a) Waiver of Matching Funds for Awarded Grants and Subgrants.--At 
the request of a State (as defined in section 302 of the Family 
Violence Prevention and Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10402)), the Secretary 
of Health and Human Services shall waive--
            (1) the non-Federal contributions requirement under 
        subsection (c)(4) of section 306 of the Family Violence 
        Prevention and Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10406) with respect to 
        the grants and subgrants awarded for fiscal years 2019 and 2020 
        to such State and the eligible entities within such State under 
        such section or section 308 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 10408); and
            (2) the reporting requirements required for such subgrants 
        and grants that relate to such non-Federal contributions 
        requirement.
    (b) Waiver of Matching Funds for Grants Awarded After Date of 
Enactment.--
            (1) In general.--Subsection (c)(4) of section 306 of the 
        Family Violence Prevention and Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10406) 
        shall not apply to a qualified grant during the period of a 
        public health emergency declared pursuant to section 319 of the 
        Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d) resulting from the 
        COVID-19 pandemic.
            (2) Qualified grant defined.--In this subsection, the term 
        ``qualified grant'' means a grant or subgrant awarded--
                    (A) after the date of enactment of this section; 
                and
                    (B) under section 306, 308, or 309 of the Family 
                Violence Prevention and Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10406, 
                10408, 10409).
                                 <all>
```
§ 151.75 Preparation of site. ( a ) Grading, drainage, and associated items of site preparation are eligible for inclusion in a project, but only with respect to one landing strip at any airport, unless the airport qualifies for more than one runway, based on traffic volume or wind conditions (as outlined in § 151.77) and the overall site preparation required for development in accordance with the airport layout plan. The complete clearance of runway clear zone areas is desirable, but, as a minimum, all obstructions as determined by § 77.23 as applied to § 77.27 (b) and (c) of this chapter must be removed. Grading in runway clear zones is eligible only to remove terrain that is an obstruction. The clear zone is not a graded overrun area. Specific site preparation for an airport terminal building is eligible on the same basis as the building itself. The site preparation cost is prorated based on eligible and ineligible building space. Appendix B of this part sets forth typical eligible and ineligible items of site preparation as covered by this section.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, eligible drainage work off the airport site includes drainage outfalls, drainage disposal, and interception ditches. If there is damage to adjacent property, its correction is an eligible item for inclusion in the project.
[Doc. No. 1329, 27 FR 12357, Dec. 13, 1962, as amended by Amdt. 151-7, 30 FR 7484, June 8, 1965; Amdt. 151-8, 30 FR 8040, June 23, 1965]