alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of Workshop. 

# SUMMARY:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will host a public workshop to discuss the proposed new appendix to Chapter 19 of the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), entitled “Appendix D—Use of Risk Information in Review of Non-Risk Informed License Amendment Requests.” The appendix is being developed to provide guidance to the NRC staff on the use of risk information in those rare instances where license amendment requests appear to meet regulatory requirements but raise significant risk concerns due to some special circumstances associated with the request. The workshop is open to the public.

# DATES:

The workshop will be held on May 16, 2000, from 9 am to 12 noon.

# ADDRESSES:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Room T-8A1, Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Egan Y. Wang, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, telephone (301) 415-1076, e-mail                         *eyw@nrc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The proposed new appendix and a Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on the appendix was issued in the                     **Federal Register**                    on April 10, 2000 (FR, Vol. 65, No. 69, 19030-19034). This workshop will provide an opportunity to discuss topics related to the appendix. Anyone interested in providing a presentation on this topic should contact Egan Wang at (301) 415-1076.                

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 20th day of April 2000.

Steven K. West,

Acting Chief, Generic Issues, Environmental, Financial and Rulemaking Branch, Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 00-10739  Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
#### McADORY, ET AL. V. MORTON.

(Decided December 18, 1913.)

Appeal from Birmingham City Court.

Heard before Hon. C. C. Nesmith.

*670Gibson & Davis, for appellant. Harsh, Beddow & Fitts, for appellee.

Walker, P. J.

None of the assignments are insisted upon so as to require consideration.

Affirmed.
§ 135.157 Oxygen equipment requirements. ( a ) *Unpressurized aircraft.* No person may operate an unpressurized aircraft at altitudes prescribed in this section unless it is equipped with enough oxygen dispensers and oxygen to supply the pilots under § 135.89(a) and to supply, when flying— ( 1 ) At altitudes above 10,000 feet through 15,000 feet MSL, oxygen to at least 10 percent of the occupants of the aircraft, other than the pilots, for that part of the flight at those altitudes that is of more than 30 minutes duration; and
( 2 ) Above 15,000 feet MSL, oxygen to each occupant of the aircraft other than the pilots.
( b ) *Pressurized aircraft.* No person may operate a pressurized aircraft— ( 1 ) At altitudes above 25,000 feet MSL, unless at least a 10-minute supply of supplemental oxygen is available for each occupant of the aircraft, other than the pilots, for use when a descent is necessary due to loss of cabin pressurization; and
( 2 ) Unless it is equipped with enough oxygen dispensers and oxygen to comply with paragraph (a) of this section whenever the cabin pressure altitude exceeds 10,000 feet MSL and, if the cabin pressurization fails, to comply with § 135.89 (a) or to provide a 2-hour supply for each pilot, whichever is greater, and to supply when flying— ( i ) At altitudes above 10,000 feet through 15,000 feet MSL, oxygen to at least 10 percent of the occupants of the aircraft, other than the pilots, for that part of the flight at those altitudes that is of more than 30 minutes duration; and
( ii ) Above 15,000 feet MSL, oxygen to each occupant of the aircraft, other than the pilots, for one hour unless, at all times during flight above that altitude, the aircraft can safely descend to 15,000 feet MSL within four minutes, in which case only a 30-minute supply is required.
( c ) The equipment required by this section must have a means— ( 1 ) To enable the pilots to readily determine, in flight, the amount of oxygen available in each source of supply and whether the oxygen is being delivered to the dispensing units; or
( 2 ) In the case of individual dispensing units, to enable each user to make those determinations with respect to that person's oxygen supply and delivery; and
( 3 ) To allow the pilots to use undiluted oxygen at their discretion at altitudes above 25,000 feet MSL.
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–573

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3039, THE

CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION ACT OF 1999

APRIL 11, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 470]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 470, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 3039, the

Chesapeake Bay Restoration Act of 1999, under an open rule. The

rule provides one hour of general debate divided equally between

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure. The rule provides that the bill

will be open to amendment at any point.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given priority in

recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with

House rules. The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole to postpone votes during consideration of the bill and to reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote

follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, that:

     -    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     -    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the Corporation's financial condition and results
          of operations of the corporation as of the dates and for the periods
          expressed in this quarterly report.


/s/ Kevin A. Schmidt
-------------------------------------
Kevin A. Schmidt,
Principal Financial Officer

Dated: August 9, 2006


                                       28
#### § 13.131 Other procedures.

Any question concerning the scope or conduct of a formal investigation not covered in this subpart may be ruled on by the presiding officer on his or her own initiative, or on the motion of a party or a person testifying or producing evidence.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                                      5
<LEGEND>
                            THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                           EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997
                           AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                                                                  BALANCE SHEET.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                                 0000797978
<NAME>                                   FFCA INVESTOR SERVICES CORPORATION 86-B
<MULTIPLIER>                                                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                                          U.S. DOLLARS
                                               
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                                 100
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               100
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           200
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                                               

</TABLE>
#### § 14.12 Documentation of fees and expenses.

The application shall be accompanied by full documentation of the fees and expenses, including the cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project or similar matter, for which an award is sought. A separate itemized statement shall be submitted for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the application, showing the hours spent in connection with the proceedings by each individual, a description of the specific services performed, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for which reimbursement is sought, the total amount claimed, and the total amount paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services provided. The administrative law judge may require the applicant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any expenses claimed.
#### § 141.9 Examining authority.

The FAA issues examining authority to a pilot school for a training course if the pilot school and its training course meet the requirements of subpart D of this part.

[Doc. No. FAA-2006-26661, 74 FR 42563, Aug. 21, 2009]
Exhibit
32.1








Certification of the Chief Executive Officer




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350




(Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I, H. Lynn Harton, Chief Executive Officer of The South Financial Group,
Inc. (“TSFG”) certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 of TSFG
(the “Report”):




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TSFG.












/s/ H.
      Lynn Harton


H. Lynn Harton


Chief Executive Officer


The South Financial Group, Inc.




August 6, 2010













A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The South
Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Worlick HOWARD *v.*TRI-STATE INSURANCE CO

5-6072

486 S.W. 2d 77

Opinion delivered November 6, 1972

*Mooney & Boone,*for appellant.

*Kirsch, Cathey, Brown ir Goodwin,*for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

This case originated from an intersection collision between Worlick Howard, appellant, and a fire truck owned by the city of Paragould and insured by appellee, Tri-State Insurance Company. The sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in giving AMI (Civil) 614 (sudden emergency).

*406The testimony as to the occurrence was very brief and was given by appellant and the truck driver. Appellant testified that he was proceeding on Highland Street; that he entered North Third Street; and that the stop signs were in his favor. “I never saw the fire truck before the accident. I did not know what hit me. The next I knew I was in the hospital.” The truck driver testified that he was answering a fire call and had his regulation lights and siren turned on. Of the impact he said: “I was not going over 25 miles per hour when the accident happened ... I looked to the right. I didn’t see anything and looked left and when I looked back I seen him and we hit just like that [instantaneously]”

We find not one iota of testimony of either driver finding himself in ah emergency situation and taking action accordingly. The giving of the instruction was therefore error. *Smith*v. *Alexander,*245 Ark. 567, 433 S.W. 2d 157 (1968). An erroneous instruction which is likely to mislead the jury is prejudicial. *Johnston*v. *Pennington,*105 Ark. 278, 150 S.W. 863 (1912). In the case at bar the jury was by other instructions advised as to the emergency status of a fire truck. The jury therefore may well have believed that the truck driver, under AMI 614, enjoyed some special privilege.

Reversed and remanded.
#### § 1240.113 Financial accounting.

NASA shall provide for appropriate database and accounting system(s) to ensure that award payments are recorded and disbursed in an orderly fashion and in the proper amounts to proper awardees.

[77 FR 27367, May 10, 2012]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




I, Mack I. Whittle, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of The South Financial Group,
Inc. ("TSFG") certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 of TSFG
(the "Report"):


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         TSFG.



/s/ Mack I. Whittle, Jr.
----------------------------------
Mack I. Whittle, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
The South Financial Group, Inc.
May 10, 2005


 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to The South Financial Group, Inc.
and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1










CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)












In connection with the Report of HST
Global, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Ron Howell, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:







1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Date:
November 13, 2009







\s\ Ron
Howell


Ron
Howell


Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the periods indicated below were as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 FIFTY-TWO      FIFTY-TWO     FIFTY-TWO    FORTY-FOUR    FIFTY-TWO
                                                                WEEKS ENDED    WEEKS ENDED   WEEKS ENDED  WEEKS ENDED   WEEKS ENDED
                                                                -----------    -----------   -----------  -----------   -----------
                                                                  JUNE 29        JUNE 30        JULY 1       JULY 3      AUGUST 29
                                                                    2002          2001           2000         1999         1998
                                                                -----------    -----------   -----------  -----------   -----------
<S>                                                             <C>            <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                  --             --            --            --           --

Deficiency in the coverage of fixed charges by earnings           $80,009        $11,985       $16,539        $827        $8,453
</TABLE>

For purposes of calculating the above ratios, earnings are defined as income
before income taxes and extraordinary items, plus fixed charges. Fixed charges
consists of interest expense on all indebtedness, amortization of deferred
financing costs , and one-third of rental expense on operating leases
representing that portion of rental expense deemed by the Company to be
attributable to interest. The ratio of earnings to fixed charges equals earnings
divided by fixed charges.
§ 136.31 Applicability. ( a ) This part restates and paraphrases several sections of the National Parks Air Tour Management Act of 2000, including section 803 (codified at 49 U.S.C. 40128) and sections 806 and 809. This subpart clarifies the requirements for the development of an air tour management plan for each park in the national park system where commercial air tour operations are flown.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, this subpart applies to each commercial air tour operator who conducts a commercial air tour operation over— ( 1 ) A unit of the national park system;
( 2 ) Tribal lands as defined in this subpart; or
( 3 ) Any area within one-half mile outside the boundary of any unit of the national park system.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to a commercial air tour operator conducting a commercial air tour operation— ( 1 ) Over the Grand Canyon National Park;
( 2 ) Over that portion of tribal lands within or abutting the Grand Canyon National Park;
( 3 ) Over any land or waters located in the State of Alaska; or
( 4 ) While flying over or near the Lake Mead Recreation Area, solely as a transportation route, to conduct a commercial air tour over the Grand Canyon National Park.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-8690, 67 FR 65667, Oct. 25, 2002. Redesignated and amended by Amdt. 136-1, 72 FR 6912, Feb. 13, 2007]
SERVED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AIR AMBULANCE BY AIR TREK. INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1003 

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

In view ofthe impending prospective lapse in FY20 14 appropriations funding 

government operations as of September 30,2013, the Department has directed that all employees 

in the Ofllce of Hearings be furloughed in the event of such a lapse. Accordingly, in the event of 

such a lapse, the Office of Hearings will close on Tuesday, October 1, 2013, for the duration of 

the shutdown. 

Any deadline. whether set by regulation or previous order, is suspended and extended for 

the duration of the shutdown. 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Esq., Respondent's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Finn 

One Research Court, Suite 350 

Rockville, MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301~294-2525 

Stephen W. Brice Esq., Complainant's Counsel 

Eastern Region, AEA-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza, Room 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3268 

FAX: 718-533-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

ChiefAdministrative Law .Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mall. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-