alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 14.10 Contents of application. ( a ) An application for an award of fees and expenses under the Act shall identify the applicant and the proceeding for which an award is sought. The application shall show that the applicant has prevailed and identify the position of the agency in the proceeding that the applicant alleges was not substantially justified. Unless the applicant is an individual, the application shall also state the number of employees of the applicant and describe briefly the type and purpose of its organization or business.
( b ) The application shall also include a statement that the applicant's net worth does not exceed $2 million (if an individual) or $7 million (for all other applicants, including their affiliates) at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated. However, an applicant may omit this statement if: ( 1 ) It attaches a copy of a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service that it qualifies as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)), or in the case of a tax-exempt organization not required to obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service on its exempt status, a statement that describes the basis for the applicant's belief that it qualifies under such section; or
( 2 ) It states that it is a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)).
( c ) The application shall state the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought.
( d ) The application may also include any other matters that the applicant wishes this agency to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( e ) The application shall be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney for the applicant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the application is true and correct.
( f ) If the applicant is a partnership, corporation, association, organization, or sole owner of an unincorporated business, the application shall state that the applicant did not have more than 500 employees at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated, giving the number of its employees and describing briefly the type and purpose of its organization or business.
----

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 27 April 2006

on the closure of the accounts of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2004

(2006/829/EC)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

The President

Josep BORRELL FONTELLES

The Secretary-General

Julian PRIESTLEY

----

(1)OJ C 269, 28.10.2005, p. 44.

(2)OJ C 332, 28.12.2005, p. 89.

(3)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 36, 12.2.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1651/2003 (OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p. 30).

(5)OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1261/2005 (OJ L 201, 2.8.2005, p. 3).

----

RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

with comments forming an integral part of the decision on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2004

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

----

(1)OJ C 269, 28.10.2005, p. 44.

(2)OJ C 332, 28.12.2005, p. 89.

(3)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 36, 12.2.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1651/2003 (OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p. 30).

(5)OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1261/2005 (OJ L 201, 2.8.2005, p. 3).

----
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-10-00807-CV

KAAREN CAMBIO AND CALIFORNIA PIPE RECYCLING, INC., Appellants

V.

JOE BRIERS, SOUTHWEST PIPE SERVICES, INC., AND S.W. PIPE HOLDINGS, 

INC., Appellees

Appeal from the 412th District Court of Brazoria County. (Tr. Ct. No. 41741).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on August 

9, 2010. After due consideration, the Court grants appellant Kaaren Cambio’s motion to 

dismiss her appeal against appellees, Joe Briers, Southwest Pipe Services, Inc., and S.W. 

Pipe Holdings, Inc. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Cambio’s appeal.

The Court orders that Kaaren Cambio, Joe Briers, Southwest Pipe Services, Inc., 

and S.W. Pipe Holdings, Inc. each pay their own appellate costs with respect to the

dismissed appeal.

The Court further orders that Kaaren Cambio and her surety, U.S. Specialty 

Surety Company, are discharged from their liability on their supersedeas bond filed in the 

court below on January 3, 2011.
After submitting the remainder of the case on the appellate record and the 

arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the portions of the trial court’s judgment awarding S.W. Pipe Holdings, Inc. $15,250 in 

damages and $45,000 in attorney’s fees on its breach of contract claim against California 

Pipe Recycling, Inc. Accordingly, the Court reverses these portions of the trial court’s 

judgment, renders judgment that S.W. Pipe Holdings, Inc. take nothing on its claim 

against California Pipe Recycling, Inc., and remands the case to the trial court for a new 

trial on the issue of California Pipe Recycling, Inc.’s attorney’s fees.

The Court orders that S.W. Pipe Holdings, Inc. pay all of the appellate costs with 

respect to California Pipe Recycling, Inc.’s appeal.

The Court further orders that California Pipe Recycling, Inc. and its surety, U.S. 

Specialty Surety Company, are discharged from their liability on their supersedeas bond 

filed in the court below on January 3, 2011.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered May 12, 2015.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd. Opinion delivered 

by Justice Lloyd.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3801 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3801

 To authorize use of amounts in My Career Advancement Account Program 
accounts for fines for breaking employment contracts in connection with 
                     permanent changes of station.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2020

  Mr. Blumenthal (for himself and Mr. Kaine) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize use of amounts in My Career Advancement Account Program 
accounts for fines for breaking employment contracts in connection with 
                     permanent changes of station.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Spouse Relocation and 
Contract Reimbursement Act''.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY TO MILITARY SPOUSES OF AMOUNTS IN MY CAREER 
              ADVANCEMENT ACCOUNT PROGRAM ACCOUNTS FOR FINES FOR 
              BREAKING EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS IN CONNECTION WITH MEMBER 
              PERMANENT CHANGES OF STATION.

    (a) In General.--Amounts in the My Career Advancement Account 
(MyCAA) Program account of a military spouse may be used to reimburse 
the military spouse for payment by the military spouse of a fine 
imposed on the military spouse by an employer in connection with the 
breaking of an employment contract if the military spouse breaks the 
employment contract for purposes of relocation with the member of the 
Armed Forces concerned due to a permanent change of station.
    (b) Limitation.--The total amount used by a military spouse for a 
reimbursement under subsection (a) may not exceed the lesser of--
            (1) the amount in the My Career Advancement Account Program 
        account of the military spouse at the time of the 
        reimbursement; or
            (2) $4,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND
IT QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000797463
<NAME> GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,132
<SECURITIES>                                    88,157
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,710
<INVENTORY>                                      1,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                               0<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 365,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                         75,076
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F2>
<PREFERRED>                                          0<F1>
<COMMON>                                             0<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   365,999
<SALES>                                          7,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,595
<CGS>                                            6,515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,405
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,463
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,498
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,965
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,965
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Not disclosed in interim periods
<F2>Not applicable to GE Capital Services, Inc.
</FN>


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 30, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51192

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH LEE STRAIT, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CV-350

USDC No. 5:05-CR-185-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DENNIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joseph Lee Strait, Jr., federal prisoner # 61036-180, moves

this court for a certificate of appealability (COA) following the

district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion wherein he

challenged his conviction for possession with the intent to

distribute cocaine base. Strait’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) is granted.

Strait argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for

failing to properly object to the enhancement of his sentence as
No. 06-51192

-2-

both legally inapplicable under the Sentencing Guidelines and

unconstitutional under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

(2005). Strait also argues that his trial counsel failed to file

a notice of appeal on his behalf even though he specifically

requested that counsel do so.

To obtain a COA, Strait must demonstrate that “reasonable

jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the

constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S.

322, 338 (2003). With respect to his claim that his counsel

rendered ineffective assistance in connection with his objection

to the sentence enhancement, Strait has failed to meet this

standard. Accordingly, his motion for a COA is DENIED as to this

claim. With respect to his claim that his counsel failed to file

a requested notice of appeal, Strait has made the showing

required for the issuance of a COA. See Roe v. Flores-Ortega,

528 U.S. 470, 477, 483 (2000). Accordingly, Strait’s motion for

a COA is GRANTED solely with respect to this issue. IFP GRANTED. 

The judgment is VACATED and the case REMANDED for further

development in the district court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

---------------------------------------------------------------

In re

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

 as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, 

et al.,

Debtors.

x

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

PROMESA 

Title III

Case No. 17-BK-3283 (LTS)

(Jointly Administered)

---------------------------------------------------------------

In re

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

 as representative of

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER 

AUTHORITY (PREPA)

Debtor.

---------------------------------------------------------------

x

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

x

PROMESA 

Title III

Case No. 17-BK-04780 (LTS)

Court Filing Relates Only to PREPA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

I hereby certify that Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, as administrative agent for certain 

lenders (hereafter “Scotiabank”), in accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9014(b), Fed. R. Bankr. P. 

7004(b), and the Court’s Third Amended Notice, Case Management and Administrative 

Procedures Order (Docket No. 1512 of Case No. 17-03283 (LTS)) (the “CMP Order”), sent a 

true and exact copy of the document titled: Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, as Administrative Agent, 

Notice of Filing of Certified English Translation (Docket No. 631 of Case No. 17-04780 (LTS)),

by electronic mail upon all the parties listed in the Master Service List on FEBRUARY 5

th

, 

2018, and was sent by U.S. mail on FEBRUARY 6

th, 2018 upon all the Standard Parties 

listed in the CMP Order.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2420 Filed:02/06/18 Entered:02/06/18 16:25:29 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 6

th day of February, 2018.

WE HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date, we electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing 

to all CM/ECF participants in this case. 

MCCONNELL VALDÉS LLC

Attorneys for Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, as 

Administrative Agent

270 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 7

Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918

PO Box 364225

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-4225

Telephone: 787-250-5604

Facsimile: 787-759-9225

By: s/Antonio A. Arias

Antonio A. Arias

USDC-PR No. 204906

aaa@mcvpr.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2420 Filed:02/06/18 Entered:02/06/18 16:25:29 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 121.273 Fire-detector systems.

Enough quick-acting fire detectors must be provided in each designated fire zone to assure the detection of any fire that may occur in that zone.
§ 121.470 Applicability. This subpart prescribes flight time limitations and rest requirements for domestic all-cargo operations, except that: ( a ) Certificate holders conducting operations with aircraft having a passenger seat configuration of 30 seats or fewer, excluding each crewmember seat, and a payload capacity of 7,500 pounds or less, may comply with the applicable requirements of §§ 135.261 through 135.273 of this chapter.
( b ) Certificate holders conducting scheduled operations entirely within the States of Alaska or Hawaii with aircraft having a passenger seat configuration of more than 30 seats, excluding each crewmember seat, or a payload capacity of more than 7,500 pounds, may comply with the requirements of this subpart or subpart R of this part for those operations.
( c ) A certificate holder may apply the flightcrew member flight time and duty limitations and requirements of part 117 of this chapter. A certificate holder may choose to apply part 117 to its— ( 1 ) Cargo operations conducted under contract to a U.S. government agency.
( 2 ) All-cargo operations not conducted under contract to a U.S. Government agency,
( 3 ) A certificate holder may elect to treat operations in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section differently but, once having decided to conduct those operations under part 117, may not segregate those operations between this subpart and part 117.
[Doc. No. FAA-2009-1093, 77 FR 402, Jan. 4, 2012; Amdt. 121-357, 78 FR 69288, Nov. 19, 2013, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2022-1563; Amdt. No. 121-390, 88 FR 48090, July 26, 2023]
Exhibit 99 (b)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2003, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer (Chief Financial
Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

        (2)the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.



/s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN
----------------------
J. Robert Buchanan
Treasurer
(Chief Financial Officer)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131613 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131613 

 COA: 268377 

Wayne CC: 04-010648,

RAHMAN ABDUL-RAHL GILLESPIE, 05-005770 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2006 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
# Official Journal L 315/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.315.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 315 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5514 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.315.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 315

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5514 November 2012

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (1) | 1 |
| | * | Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA | 57 |
| | * | Directive 2012/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 54 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in respect of the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent (1) | 74 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (1)

1

*

Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA

57

*

Directive 2012/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 54 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in respect of the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent (1)

74

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2006 (the “Form 10-K”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, BernardH. Clineburg, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a)   the Form 10-Kfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)   the information contained in the Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial conditionand results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for,the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

| Date: March 15, 2007 |   | /s/ BERNARD H.  CLINEBURG |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                           |   | Bernard H. Clineburg      |
|                      |   | Chairman and              |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----