alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Œ This opinion was released initially in typescript form.

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit ____________

No. 06-2801

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SHAABAN HAFIZ AHMAD ALI SHAABAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

 Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

No. 05 CR 34—John Daniel Tinder, Judge.

____________

APPELLANT COUNSEL’S MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AND TO ALLOW MR. SHAABAN

TO PROCEED PRO SE

____________

APRIL 24, 2008Œ

____________

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge (in chambers). Counsel for Shaaban

Hafiz Ahmad Ali Shaaban seeks leave to withdraw as

appointed counsel for Mr. Shaaban and asks that I

permit Mr. Shaaban to proceed pro se. On January 28,
2 No. 06-2801

2008, I appointed new counsel for Mr. Shaaban after

concluding that the record raised substantial doubt that

his previously appointed counsel had fulfilled adequately

his obligations under the Seventh Circuit Criminal Justice

Act Plan, § V.3. United States v. Shaaban, 514 F.3d 697, 698-

99 (7th Cir. 2008) (Ripple, J., in chambers). I directed

that new counsel file either a petition for rehearing or a

motion to withdraw on the ground that any such petition

would be frivolous. Id. at 699. On February 7, 2008, the

court appointed Chief Federal Defender Richard H.

Parsons in Peoria, Illinois, and Staff Attorney Andrew J.

McGowan of that office was assigned to the case.

Attorney McGowan now represents that he has identified a non-frivolous issue that could be raised in the

petition for rehearing, but he further notes that there are

possible negative consequences to raising that issue.

Mr. Shaaban has informed Mr. McGowan that he does

not want this issue to be raised. Instead, Mr. Shaaban

has prepared a pro se petition for rehearing that raises

the issues that Mr. Shaaban wants to be raised. He attempted to file his pro se petition with the court, but the

Clerk properly rejected the pro se petition because

Mr. Shaaban was represented by counsel. As a result of

the disagreement regarding how to proceed, counsel

believes that there has been a breakdown in the attorneyclient relationship and moves to withdraw.

Counsel was directed to file either a petition for rehearing or a motion to withdraw because such a petition

would be frivolous. Shaaban, 514 F.3d at 699. Attorney

McGowan explains that he cannot represent that a petition

for rehearing would be frivolous because the issue he

has identified could have possible beneficial consequences, as well as possible negative consequences.
No. 06-2801 3

Mr. Shaaban, however, does not want this issue to be

raised. I must conclude that counsel has attempted to

comply with the court’s directive, but that Mr. Shaaban

would prefer to file a pro se petition for rehearing

raising the issues that he believes should be raised. Accordingly, I grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and

permit Mr. Shaaban to file a pro se petition for rehearing within 30 days. 

IT IS SO ORDERED

USCA-02-C-0072—5-1-08
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 032000E]


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) has 
cancelled the public meeting of its Research Steering and Experimental 
Fisheries Committee that was scheduled for Tuesday and Wednesday, April 
25-26, 2000, at 9:00 and 8:30 a.m., respectively. The meetings were 
announced in the Federal Register on March 27, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: 978-465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The initial notice published on March 27, 
2000 (65 FR 16186). The meeting will be rescheduled at a later date and 
announced in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 17, 2000.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-10026 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

L UI S BERNAL , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

. § § § § § § No. 08-11-00251- CR

Appea l from 409th District Court of El Paso County , Texas (TC # 20100D04018)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION L uis Be rnal appea ls his conviction of ag g rava ted assault. Finding that Appellant has no rig ht of appe al, we dismiss the appe al. Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedur e require s the trial court to cer tify the criminal defe ndant’s rig ht of appea l under Rule 25.2(a) (2). T E X . R

. A P P . P. 25.2(a) (2) and (d). Appellant filed a timely notice of appea l, including the trial court’s cer tification as require d by Rules 25.2(a) (2) and 25.2(d), but the cer tification ref

lects that the appea l “is a plea- barg ain case , and the Def endant ha s NO rig ht of appe al.” I n a plea- barg ain case , a defe ndant may appea l only those matters raised by written motion and ruled on befor e trial, or afte r g etting the court’s permission to appea l. T E X .R.A P P .P. 25.2(a) (2). The recor d ref

l ec t s t hat Appellant enter ed a neg otiated guilty plea and the t rial court followed the plea barg ain. The Clerk’s Offic e notified Appellant’s counsel that the cer tification ref

lects that Appellant has no rig ht of appea l in this case and reque sted a response addre ssing whether appellant has a rig ht of appea l. The El Paso County Public Def ender has filed a response confirming that the trial court followed the plea barg ain, there are no pretria l r ulings which could be appea led, and thetrial court has denied permission to appea l any other issues. Ba sed on the trial court’s cer tification and the r ecor d befor e us, we dismiss the appe al.

November

2, 2011 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, Chief J ustice Be fore McClure, C.J ., Rivera, J., and Chew, C.J . (Senior) Chew, C.J . (Senior), not pa rticipating (Do Not Publish)
# L_2008245EN.01S00301.xml

| 13.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 245/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 245/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
§ 711.7 Change in circumstances. ( a ) *Termination.* A management official shall terminate his or her service if a change in circumstances causes the service to become prohibited. A change in circumstances may include, but is not limited to, an increase in asset size of an organization, a change in the delineation of the RMSA or community, the establishment of an office, an increase in the aggregate deposits of the depository organization, or an acquisition, merger, consolidation, or reorganization of the ownership structure of a depository organization that causes a previously permissible interlock to become prohibited.
( b ) *Transition period.* A management official described in paragraph (a) of this section may continue to serve the depository organization involved in the interlock for 15 months following the date of the change in circumstances. NCUA may shorten this period under appropriate circumstances.
[61 FR 50702, Sept. 27, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 66360, Nov. 26, 1999]
#### § 712.6 What activities and services are prohibited for CUSOs?

*General.* CUSOs must not acquire control of, either directly or indirectly, another depository financial institution, nor invest in shares, stocks, or obligations of an insurance company, trade association, liquidity facility or similar organization, corporation, or association.

[63 FR 10756, Mar. 5, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 66361, Nov. 26, 1999]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 399/2006

of 7 March 2006         

establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 (2) laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92, and in particular Article 173(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The unit values provided for in Article 173(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 are hereby established as set out in the table in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 March 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 March 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 648/2005 (OJ L 117, 4.5.2005, p. 13).

(2)OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 883/2005 (OJ L 148, 11.6.2005, p. 5).

----

ANNEX

----
#### § 129.103 [Reserved]
|     | At                     |   |
|----------|------------------------|--------|
|     | March      31, 2009(a) |   | December      31, 2008 |   | March      31,2008 |   |
|     |                   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Managed  |                   | 2.84   | % |   |   | 2.17 | % |   |   | 1.36 | % |   |
| Off-book |                   | 2.04   |   |   |   | 1.20 |   |   |   | 0.77 |   |   |
| On-book  |                   | 2.97   |   |   |   | 2.34 |   |   |   | 1.49 |   |   |

|     | At                    |   |
|----------|-----------------------|--------|
|     | March      31,2009(a) |   | December      31,2008 |   | March      31,2008 |   |
|     |                  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Managed  |                  | 8.20   | % |   |   | 7.43 | % |   |   | 5.66 | % |   |
| U.S.     |                  | 7.12   |   |   |   | 7.14 |   |   |   | 5.75 |   |   |
| Non-U.S. |                  | 8.72   |   |   |   | 7.57 |   |   |   | 5.62 |   |   |
| Off-book |                  | 6.41   |   |   |   | 8.24 |   |   |   | 6.96 |   |   |
| U.S.     |                  | 6.41   |   |   |   | 8.24 |   |   |   | 6.96 |   |   |
| Non-U.S. |                  | (b)    |   |   |   | (b) |   |   |   | (b) |   |   |
| On-book  |                  | 8.49   |   |   |   | 7.31 |   |   |   | 5.49 |   |   |
| U.S.     |                  | 7.65   |   |   |   | 6.39 |   |   |   | 4.84 |   |   |
| Non-U.S. |                  | 8.72   |   |   |   | 7.57 |   |   |   | 5.62 |   |   |
|     |                  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

| (a) | Subject      to update. |
|-----|-------------------------|
| (b) | Not      applicable.    |

----

----
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  By:
    
    /s/ Philip Cook

Philip Cook
Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Glenn Darden

Glenn Darden
President and Chief Executive Officer
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00034

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

00034\00034_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00034\00034_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00034\00034_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00034\00034_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00034\00034_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00034\00034_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00034\00034_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

00034\Supporting Documents\00034_EDG A5-2 MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00034\Supporting Documents\00034_EDG A5-2 MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00034\Supporting Documents\00034_EDG A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00034\Supporting Documents\00034_EDG A5-3 WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00034\Supporting Documents\00034_EDG A5-3 WB-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00034\Supporting Documents\00034_EDG A5-3 WB-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00034\Supporting Documents\00034_EDG D3-1 D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00034\Supporting Documents\00034_WPL's Response to EPA ICR_WPL_091510.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00034\00034_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00034\00034_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

Motion submitting Part of Exhibit II of BDO Puerto Rico, PSC’s (now known as, Old Puerto 

Rico, PSC) Response to 570th Omnibus Objection

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

COMES NOW BDO Puerto Rico PSC (now known as, Old Puerto Rico, PSC) 

represented by the undersigned attorney and respectfully sets forth and prays:

1. Exhibit no. II of the appearing party’s Response to the 570th Omnibus objection contains 830 pages. 

Due to the data storage limits set by the CM/ECF system when filing an exhibit, Creditor BDO Puerto 

Rico PSC (hereinafter “OLD”) must file Exhibit II in parts. ECF no. 24317.

2. Therefore, Creditor OLD will file several notices with Exhibit II divided into parts of approximately 

70 to 95 pages each. With this motion, Creditor includes pages 468-557 of Exhibit II. 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective title III case number and the last four (4) 

digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) 

Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric 

Power Authority (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case 

numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24326 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:14:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE, Creditor hereby submits the attached partial Exhibit II for its Response 

to the 570th Omnibus Objection filed today at ECF no. 24317.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: In accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9014(b), Fed. R. 

Bankr. P. 7004(b), and the Court’s Sixteenth Amended Notice, Case Management and 

Administrative Procedures Order (Dkt. No. 20190-1) (the “CMP Order”), I hereby certify that a 

true and exact copy of the foregoing was sent by electronic mail upon all the parties listed in the 

Master Service List and by U.S. mail upon all the Standard Parties listed in the CMP Order.

 In Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, on May 25, 2023. 

Juan R. Rivera Font, LLC

27 González Giusti 

Ave.

Suite 602

Guaynabo, PR 00968

Tel: 787-250-8040

s/Juan R. Rivera Font

Juan R. Rivera-Font, Esq.

USDC-PR 221703

 juan@riverafont.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24326 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:14:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6700
THERON JOHNNY MAXTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusMICHAEL MOORE, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; MS. ASKIN, Nurse, Kirkland Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2460-3-6BC) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theron Johnny Maxton, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY & KOBROVSKY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maxton v. Moore , No. CA-95-2460-3-6BC (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/09/22 17:04:16 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/09/22 17:04:16 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 171.1 Scope.

This subpart sets forth minimum requirements for the approval and operation on non-Federal VOR facilities that are to be involved in the approval of instrument flight rules and air traffic control procedures related to those facilities.

[Doc. No. 5034, 29 FR 11337, Aug. 6, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 171-2, 31 FR 5408, Apr. 6, 1966; Amdt. 171-7, 35 FR 12711, Aug. 11, 1970]
#### § 1212.302 Granting the request to amend.

NASA shall make the requested amendment clearly on the record itself and all information deemed to be inaccurate, irrelevant, or untimely shall be deleted and destroyed. Incomplete information shall either be amended or deleted and destroyed. The individual shall then be informed in writing that the amendment has been made. If the inaccurate, irrelevant, untimely, or incomplete portion of the record has previously been disclosed, then the system manager shall notify those persons or agencies of the amended information, referencing the prior disclosures (See § 1212.402).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          23,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    166,597
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,509
<PP&E>                                         628,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                 238,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 686,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,556,421
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        55,677
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   686,700
<SALES>                                        142,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,087
<CGS>                                          165,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               482,585
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (44,039)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (548,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 125.155 Shutoff means. ( a ) Each engine must have a means for shutting off or otherwise preventing hazardous amounts of fuel, oil, deicer, and other flammable fluids from flowing into, within, or through any designated fire zone. However, means need not be provided to shut off flow in lines that are an integral part of an engine.
( b ) The shutoff means must allow an emergency operating sequence that is compatible with the emergency operation of other equipment, such as feathering the propeller, to facilitate rapid and effective control of fires.
( c ) Shutoff means must be located outside of designated fire zones, unless equivalent safety is provided, and it must be shown that no hazardous amount of flammable fluid will drain into any designated fire zone after a shutoff.
( d ) Adequate provisions must be made to guard against inadvertent operation of the shutoff means and to make it possible for the crew to reopen the shutoff means after it has been closed.
# C_2017351EN.01002101.xml

| 19.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/21

---

Corrigendum to call for proposals under the multiannual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020 (Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 5437 amending Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 334 of 6 October 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 334 of 6 October 2017

(2017/C 351/08)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, is announcing a corrigendum to the call for proposals in order to award grants in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the multiannual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector (General envelope), as published in the Official Journal (2017/C 334/02).

This call for proposals addresses the priority ‘Single European Sky — SESAR’.

The corrigendum to the call for proposals is available on:

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-transport/apply-funding/2017-cef-transport-sesar-call-proposals

---