alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: December 1, 2016 

DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC ZDI. NOV 3 I P 2: 5 I 

DOCKET OPERATIONS 

Docket No. FAA-2014-1116 

Pacific International Skydiving Center 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2014WP130012 

Respondent 

ORDER GRANTING COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA 

On November 16, 2016, the undersigned judge issued an Order Granting Request to Issue 

Subpoenas. That same day, the Complainant filed a motion to quash the subpoena for FAA 

Safety Inspector, Curtis Whaley. In support of its motion, inter alia, the Complainant cited 

14 C.F.R. § 13.227, which states "An employee of the agency may not be called as an expert or 

opinion witness, for any party other than the FAA, in any proceeding governed by this subpart." 

As written, 14 C.F .R. § 13.227 does not allow an administrative law judge any discretion to 

deviate from the complete bar of an agency employee being called as an expert or opinion 

witness for any party other than the FAA. 1 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(8), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. Complainant's Motion to Quash Subpoena is granted. 

2. The subpoena ordering Curtis Whaley to testify at the hearing in this case is quashed. 

Attachment: Service List 

--p,e'_ 

DOUGLAS M. RA WALD 

Administrative Law Judge 

1 See In re Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc., FAA-2013-0045 at 6 (Order Granting/Denying Relief, Feb. 4, 2014) 

(pointing out that 14 C.F.R. § 13.227limits and/or prohibits the ability of each party to subpoena the employees of 

the other); see also In re Airborne Maintenance and Engineering Services, F AA-20 13-0291 at 13 (Order Granting 

Respondent's Motion to Exclude, and Granting/Denying Other Motions, Feb. 11, 2015) (reiterating that 14 C.F.R. § 

13.227 prohibits a Respondent from calling any FAA employee as an expert on behalf of the Respondent's defense). 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10002 

ONE COPY 

Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel 

8900 SW 1 07th A venue, Suite 203 

Miami, FL 33176 

TEL: 305-598-4841 

FAX: 305-598-4842 

Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, A WP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Western-Pacific Region 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-3454 

FAX:310-725-6816 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-1116 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

2 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Knight Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John B. Howard, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JOHN B. HOWARDName:

John B. HowardTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

February 28, 2007




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3690 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2004 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2 West Main Street in Batavia, New York, 

as the ‘‘Barber Conable Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 3690 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 2 West Main Street in Batavia, New York, shall 

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Barber Conable Post 

5 Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Barber Conable Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 25, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                    5,514
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                             4,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                              30,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         42,267
<PP&E>                                    3,457
<DEPRECIATION>                            1,164
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           66,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    36,568
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      6
<OTHER-SE>                               25,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             66,411
<SALES>                                 121,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        121,516
<CGS>                                   104,898
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           104,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         17,722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,501)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (502)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (999)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                               (999)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.28)
        


</TABLE>
October 2, 2015

Mr. Vincent Antonio Piatek

Quad Pictures

1911 SW Campus Drive, #392

Federal Way, WA 98023

Dear Mr. Piatek:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

part 21 and §§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a)(b), 91.9(b)(2), 91.203(a)(b), 91.103(b)(2), 91.105, 91.109, 

91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.203(a)(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(1)(2), and 91.417(a)(b)

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your June 14, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Quad Pictures filed in 

Docket No. FAA−2015−2561, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
§ 324.100 Purpose, applicability, and principle of conservatism. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart E establishes: ( 1 ) Minimum qualifying criteria for FDIC-supervised institutions using institution-specific internal risk measurement and management processes for calculating risk-based capital requirements; and
( 2 ) Methodologies for such FDIC-supervised institutions to calculate their total risk-weighted assets.
( b ) *Applicability.* ( 1 ) This subpart applies to an FDIC-supervised institution that: ( i ) Is a subsidiary of a global systemically important BHC, as identified pursuant to 12 CFR 217.402;
( ii ) Is a Category II FDIC-supervised institution;
( iii ) Is a subsidiary of a depository institution that uses the advanced approaches pursuant to 12 CFR part 3, subpart E (OCC), 12 CFR part 217, subpart E (Board), or this subpart (FDIC) to calculate its risk-based capital requirements;
( iv ) Is a subsidiary of a bank holding company or savings and loan holding company that uses the advanced approaches pursuant to subpart E of 12 CFR part 217 to calculate its risk-based capital requirements; or
( v ) Elects to use this subpart to calculate its risk-based capital requirements.
( 2 ) A market risk FDIC-supervised institution must exclude from its calculation of risk-weighted assets under this subpart the risk-weighted asset amounts of all covered positions, as defined in subpart F of this part (except foreign exchange positions that are not trading positions, over-the-counter derivative positions, cleared transactions, and unsettled transactions).
( c ) *Principle of conservatism.* Notwithstanding the requirements of this subpart, an FDIC-supervised institution may choose not to apply a provision of this subpart to one or more exposures provided that: ( 1 ) The FDIC-supervised institution can demonstrate on an ongoing basis to the satisfaction of the FDIC that not applying the provision would, in all circumstances, unambiguously generate a risk-based capital requirement for each such exposure greater than that which would otherwise be required under this subpart;
( 2 ) The FDIC-supervised institution appropriately manages the risk of each such exposure;
( 3 ) The FDIC-supervised institution notifies the FDIC in writing prior to applying this principle to each such exposure; and
( 4 ) The exposures to which the FDIC-supervised institution applies this principle are not, in the aggregate, material to the FDIC-supervised institution.
[78 FR 55471, Sept. 10, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 41423, July 15, 2015; 84 FR 59279, Nov. 1, 2019]
# Diario Oficial C 432I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 432I |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 64.° año26 de octubre de 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 432I

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

64.° año26 de octubre de 2021

---

| Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Anuncios |
| | PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Instituto Europeo de Innovación y Tecnología |
| 2021/C 432 I/01 | Convocatoria de propuestas para la creación de una comunidad de conocimiento e innovación del Instituto Europeo de Innovación y Tecnología (EIT) — Código de la convocatoria: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN | 1 |

Sumario

Página

V   Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Instituto Europeo de Innovación y Tecnología

2021/C 432 I/01

Convocatoria de propuestas para la creación de una comunidad de conocimiento e innovación del Instituto Europeo de Innovación y Tecnología (EIT) — Código de la convocatoria: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

V Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Instituto Europeo de Innovación y Tecnología

| 26.10.2021 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CI 432/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2021

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CI 432/1

---

Convocatoria de propuestas para la creación de una comunidad de conocimiento e innovación del Instituto Europeo de Innovación y Tecnología (EIT)

Código de la convocatoria: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN

(2021/C 432 I/01)

De conformidad con el Reglamento (UE) 2021/819 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 20 de mayo de 2021, relativo al Instituto Europeo de Innovación y Tecnología (EIT), por la presente se notifica la apertura de la convocatoria de propuestas para una nueva comunidad de conocimiento e innovación (CCI). Se invita a las personas interesadas a presentar sus propuestas para la convocatoria.

Ámbito prioritario cubierto por la convocatoria: Sectores e industrias culturales y creativos

Puede obtener información sobre el plazo, las modalidades de la convocatoria y los criterios de evaluación, así como orientación sobre la presentación de las propuestas, en el texto de la convocatoria y en la página del sitio web del EIT:

https://eit.europa.eu/our-activities/call-for-eit-communities/2021

---
^ Harlowton ^

Roundup

^Pompeys

 Pillar

^Big Timber

Billings^

^ Columbus

Bridger^

^Frannie

^Lovell

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument Draft RMP / EIS

Map 13

US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Montana

 Wyoming

Invasive Species

Noxious Weeds

0 3 6 12 18 24 30

Miles

Map scale 1:1,350,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Wyoming

T

9

N

T

1

N

T

1

S

T

8

S

R18E R29E

R104W R93W

T

57

N

Location Map

Legend

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Ü

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Noxious Weeds

Interstate

Highway

^ Towns

Public Lands Survey System
§ 121.7 Definitions. The following definitions apply to those sections of part 121 that apply to ETOPS: *Adequate Airport* means an airport that an airplane operator may list with approval from the FAA because that airport meets the landing limitations of § 121.197 and is either— ( 1 ) An airport that meets the requirements of part 139, subpart D of this chapter, excluding those that apply to aircraft rescue and firefighting service, or
( 2 ) A military airport that is active and operational.
*ETOPS Alternate Airport* means an adequate airport listed in the certificate holder's operations specifications that is designated in a dispatch or flight release for use in the event of a diversion during ETOPS. This definition applies to flight planning and does not in any way limit the authority of the pilot-in-command during flight.
*ETOPS Area of Operation* means one of the following areas: ( 1 ) For turbine-engine-powered airplanes with two engines, an area beyond 60 minutes from an adequate airport, computed using a one-engine-inoperative cruise speed under standard conditions in still air.
( 2 ) For turbine-engine-powered passenger-carrying airplanes with more than two engines, an area beyond 180 minutes from an adequate airport, computed using a one-engine-inoperative cruise speed under standard conditions in still air.
*ETOPS Entry Point* means the first point on the route of an ETOPS flight, determined using a one-engine-inoperative cruise speed under standard conditions in still air, that is— ( 1 ) More than 60 minutes from an adequate airport for airplanes with two engines;
( 2 ) More than 180 minutes from an adequate airport for passenger-carrying airplanes with more than two engines.
*ETOPS Qualified Person* means a person, performing maintenance for the certificate holder, who has satisfactorily completed the certificate holder's ETOPS training program.
*Maximum Diversion Time* means, for the purposes of ETOPS route planning, the longest diversion time authorized for a flight under the operator's ETOPS authority. It is calculated under standard conditions in still air at a one-engine-inoperative cruise speed.
*North Pacific Area of Operation* means Pacific Ocean areas north of 40° N latitudes including NOPAC ATS routes, and published PACOTS tracks between Japan and North America.
*North Polar Area* means the entire area north of 78° N latitude.
*One-engine-inoperative-Cruise Speed* means a speed within the certified operating limits of the airplane that is specified by the certificate holder and approved by the FAA for — ( 1 ) Calculating required fuel reserves needed to account for an inoperative engine; or
( 2 ) Determining whether an ETOPS alternate is within the maximum diversion time authorized for an ETOPS flight.
*South Polar Area* means the entire area South of 60° S latitude.
[Doc. No. FAA-2002-6717, 72 FR 1878, Jan. 16, 2007]
#### § 1215.110 User cancellation of all services.

The user has the right to terminate its service contract with NASA at any time. A user who exercises this right after contracting for service shall pay the charge agreed upon for services previously rendered, and the cost incurred by the Government for support of pre-launch activities, services, and mission documentation not included in that charge. The user will remain responsible for the charges for any services actually provided.
# Official Journal C 237/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.237.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 237 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 557 August 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.237.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 237

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 557 August 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2012/C 237/01 | Six-monthly Progress Report on the implementation of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (2012/I) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2012/C 237/01

Six-monthly Progress Report on the implementation of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (2012/I)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 171.201 Scope. ( a ) This subpart sets forth minimum requirements for the approval and operation of non-Federal VHF marker beacon facilities that are to be involved in the approval of instrument flight rules and air traffic control procedures related to those facilities.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 625.2 Proceedings covered. ( a ) The EAJA applies to adversary adjudications conducted by the FCA either on its own behalf or in connection with any other agency of the United States that participates in or in any way is a part of the adversary adjudication. Adversary adjudications are: ( 1 ) Adjudications under 5 U.S.C. 554 in which the position of the FCA or other agency is presented by an attorney or other representative who enters an appearance and participates in the proceeding; and
( 2 ) Enforcement proceedings under 12 U.S.C. 2261-2273.
( b ) The failure of the FCA to identify a type of proceeding as an adversary adjudication shall not preclude the filing of an application by a party who believes that the proceeding is covered by the EAJA; whether the proceeding is covered shall then be an issue for resolution in proceedings on the application.
( c ) If a proceeding includes both matters covered and excluded from coverage by the EAJA, any award made will include only fees and expenses related to covered issues.
( d ) Proceedings under this part may be conducted by the FCA Board (Board) or by the presiding officer (referred to as the “adjudicative officer” in the EAJA), as defined in § 622.2(f) of this chapter. If the Board conducts proceedings, reference to the “presiding officer” in this part shall mean the Board, in applicable context. Where the Board presides, the recommended decision under § 625.26 of this part will be omitted and the Board will make a final decision on the application in accordance with § 625.27 of this part.
( e ) If a court reviews the underlying decision of the adversary adjudication, an award for fees and other expenses may be made only pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(3).
#### § 1252.202 Burden of proof.

The burden of proving that an age distinction or other action falls within the exceptions outlined in § 1252.201 (b) and (c) is on the recipient of Federal financial assistance.