alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN RE: THE FINANCIAL 

OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO 

Debtor 

CASE NO. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

TITLE III, PROMESA 

Re: ECF 1065-1, 1512-1, 1913, 1918

MOTION FOR LIFT OF STAY AS PER STIPULATION 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

NOW COME Luis F. Colon-Gonzalez through the undersigned attorney, 

and very respectfully states and prays as follows:

On December 6, 2017 we filed a motion for the lift of the automatic stay 

(Dckt. 1913) in a habeas petition in Gonzalez v. ELA, 15-cv-1560 (PAD). This 

Court immediately or automatically terminated our motion for lack of compliance 

with the Case Management Order, which directs parties in a lift of stay issue to 

confer and negotiate previous to the filing of such a motion (Dckt. 1918). In 

compliance with the Case Management Order the parties did meet and confer and 

agreed to the lift of the stay as per the attached stipulation.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2482 Filed:02/12/18 Entered:02/12/18 18:02:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Thus, we respectfully request that the Court issues an order granting this 

motion and allowing the movant to continue litigating his habeas petition in 15-

CV-1560-PAD as per the attached stipulation. 

 WHEREFORE, we respectfully request that the Court issues an order 

granting this motion and allowing the movant to continue litigating his habeas 

petition in 15-CV-1560-PAD as per the attached stipulation. 

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT on this same date we have electronically filed 

the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, 

which will distribute copies of the foregoing document to all pertinent CM/ECF 

participants. 

In Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, this February 12, 2018.

S/ ARTEMIO RIVERA RIVERA

Artemio Rivera Rivera 

USDC-PR 210114

90 Carr. 165, Ste. 309

Guaynabo, P.R. 00968-8058

Tel. 787-299-3959; Fax 787-774-0605

e-mail: art@sjlaw.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2482 Filed:02/12/18 Entered:02/12/18 18:02:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: __2011________-NM-___183______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
----

----

| 1.  | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.  | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the LP. |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      April 11, 2008                                                                                                                               |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                    |
| /s/      Michael A. Reisner                                                                                                                             |
| Michael      A. Reisner                                                                                                                                 |
| Co-Chief      Executive Officer, Co-President and Chief Financial OfficerICON      Capital Corp., General Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight A      L.P. |
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  Amendment  No. 1 to the  Annual  Report of  Hometown  Auto
Retailers,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending  December
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Charles F. Schwartz,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Charles F. Schwartz
------------------------------
Charles F. Schwartz
Chief Financial Officer
September 20, 2005
#### FRANK W. THACHER v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. L-436.

Decided June 19, 1933]

*Mr. A. S. Lisenby*for the plaintiff. *Weill,*Saterlee, *Spence <&*Blakely, and *Messrs. Hugh Saterlee*and *Walter G. Blakely*were on the brief.

*Mr. J. W.*Hussey, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Charles B. Rugg,*for the defendant.

*292Whaley, *Judge,*

delivered the opinion of the court:

On May 10, 1922, plaintiff created five irrevocable trusts and on January 8, 1924, he created a sixth irrevocable trust. The trust respectively set over certain policies of insurance on the life of plaintiff, and, in addition, certain securities. The beneficiaries of the first five trusts were plaintiff’s children and his wife, and the beneficiary of the sixth trust was a subsequently born child. All of the trusts were set up before the date of the enactment of the Revenue Act of 1924. Each trust provided that as much of the income from the securities vested therein as should be necessary for the payment of premiums on the life-insurance policies in the trust should be employed for the payment of said premiums on said policies, and that the balance, if any, should accumulate for stated distributions to the beneficiaries.

The facts have been stipulated. The issues presented are:

First. Whether Congress intended section 219 (h) of the Revenue Act of 1926 in so far as it requires that there be included in the net income of the grantor any part of the income of a trust which is or may be applied to the payment of premiums upon policies of insurance ’ on the life of the grantor, should apply to trusts such as those here involved.

Second. If it did, whether the statute was unconstitutional.

In the recent case of *Burnet,*Commissioner, v. *Wells,*decided by the Supreme Court on May 29, 1933, 289 U.S. 670, the court upheld the validity of the contested statute and held that the act applied to irrevocable as well as revocable trusts. In our opinion, the *Wells case*is decisive of this case. The petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

Williams, *Judge;*LittletoN, *Judge;*and GiseeN, *Judge,*concur.

Booth, *Chief Justiee,*did not hear this case, on account of illness, and took no part in its decision.
**Exhibit 10.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

               In  connection with the Annual Report of RTICA Corporation (the "Company") on Form  20-F for the period ended May 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert H. Stikeman, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '   1350, as adopted pursuant to '  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that: 

               1.               The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and 

               2.               The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

  

BY:/s/ Robert Stikeman                                                                    Robert H. Stikeman 

Chief Financial Officer 

November 29, 2002 

  

----
§ 161.321 Optional use of 14 CFR part 150 procedures. ( a ) An airport operator may use the procedures in part 150 of this chapter, instead of the procedures described in §§ 161.303(b) and 161.309(b) of this part, as a means of providing an adequate public notice and opportunity to comment on proposed Stage 3 restrictions, including submitted alternatives.
( b ) If the airport operator elects to use 14 CFR part 150 procedures to comply with this subpart, the operator shall: ( 1 ) Ensure that all parties identified for direct notice under § 161.303(b) are notified that the airport's 14 CFR part 150 program submission will include a proposed Stage 3 restriction under part 161, and that these parties are offered the opportunity to participate as consulted parties during the development of the 14 CFR part 150 program;
( 2 ) Include the information required in § 161.303(c) (2) through (5) and § 161.305 in the analysis of the proposed restriction in the 14 CFR part 150 program submission; and
( 3 ) Include in its 14 CFR part 150 submission to the FAA evidence of compliance with the notice requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of this section and include the information required for a part 161 application in § 161.311, together with a clear identification that the 14 CFR part 150 submission includes a proposed Stage 3 restriction for FAA review and approval under §§ 161.313, 161.315, and 161.317.
( c ) The FAA will evaluate the proposed part 161 restriction on Stage 3 aircraft operations included in the 14 CFR part 150 submission in accordance with the procedures and standards of this part, and will review the total 14 CFR part 150 submission in accordance with the procedures and standards of 14 CFR part 150.
( d ) An amendment of a restriction, as specified in § 161.319(b) of this part, may also be processed under 14 CFR part 150 procedures.
Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service 

 Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest 

Responsible Official: Scott Conroy

 Forest Supervisor 

 Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest 

For Further Information David Krantz, Project Lead 

 Forest Supervisor’s Office 

 3040 Biddle Road 

Medford, Oregon 97504 

 Phone: (541) 618-2200 

DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 

STATEMENT

United States 

Department of 

Agriculture 

Forest Service 

Pacific Northwest 

Region 

September 2011 

Motorized Vehicle Use 

on the Rogue RiverSiskiyou National Forest 
Vicinity Map 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national 

origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all 

programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, 

audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write 

USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-

9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 

High Cascades

Siskiyou Mountains

Wild Rivers

Gold Beach

Powers

Wild Rivers OREGON 

CALIFORNIA

Rogue River-Siskiyou

National Forest

OREGON

I

Medford

Grants Pass

§ ̈¦5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION IS EXTRACTED FORM THE SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,720
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          16,132
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,230
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    100,978
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          55,975
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            57,158
<LOANS>                                        233,229
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 430,631
<DEPOSITS>                                     367,902
<SHORT-TERM>                                       188
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,125
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,482
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 430,631
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,129
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,694
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   821
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                23,644
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,334
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,344
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,300
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      319
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  99
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,901
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 710
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 710 appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 710.6 Distribution of assets. ( a ) With the approval of the Regional Director, a partial pro rata distribution of the Federal credit union's assets may be made to its members from cash funds available on authorization by the board of directors or liquidating agent. Payment of a partial distribution may exclude member accounts of less than $25.00 and must not exceed the insured amount applicable to any account or accounts, as determined under part 745 of this chapter.
( b ) After all assets of the Federal credit union have been converted to cash or found to be worthless and all loans and debts owing to it have been collected or found to be uncollectible and all obligations of the Federal credit union have been paid, with the exception of shares due its members, the books shall be closed and the pro rata distribution to the members shall be computed. The computation shall be based on the total amount in each share account as of the liquidation date or the date on which all share drafts have cleared, whichever is later.
( c ) Payments must be made to members promptly after the pro rata distribution has been computed. The Federal credit union may mail a check to a member at his or her last known address, deliver the check personally to the member, or make the payment by wire or any other electronic means approved by a member.
( d ) Unclaimed share accounts, unpaid claims, and unpaid claims of members or creditors who failed to cash their final distribution checks shall be trusteed or escheated in accordance with the laws of the state in which the member or creditor resides.
( e ) The Regional Director will be notified in writing within three days when the final distribution of assets to the members is started.
[58 FR 35365, July 1, 1993, as amended at 79 FR 36198, June 26, 2014]
§ 1310.8 Freedom of Information Act. While the Board is not part of the Department of the Treasury, the Board follows the regulations promulgated by the Department of the Treasury at subpart A (“Freedom of Information Act”) of part 1 (“Disclosure of Records”) of title 31 (“Money and Finance: Treasury”) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The procedures of 31 CFR 1.1 through 1.7 shall be followed for requesting access to records maintained by the Board, and processing such requests. Any reference in 31 CFR 1.1 through 1.7 to the “Department of the Treasury,” the “Department” or to a “bureau,” shall be construed to refer to the Board. In the event that the regulations at subpart A of part 1 of title 31 of the CFR subsequently are amended by the Department of the Treasury, the Board will follow those amended regulations. The following additional information is provided to implement 31 CFR 1.1 through 1.7 with respect to the Board. ( a ) *Public reading room.* The public reading room for the Board is the Treasury Department Library. The Library is located in the Main Treasury Building, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220. For building security purposes, visitors are required to make an appointment by calling 202-622-0990.
( b ) *Requests for records.* Initial determinations under 31 CFR 1.5(h) as to whether to grant requests for records of the Board will be made by the Chief Administrative Officer or the designate of such official. Requests for records should be addressed to: Freedom of Information Request, Air Transportation Stabilization Board, Assistant Director, Disclosure Services, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
( c ) *Administrative appeal of initial determination to deny records.* ( 1 ) Appellate determinations under 31 CFR 1.5(i) with respect to records of the Board will be made by the Executive Director, or the delegate of such official.
( 2 ) Appellate determinations with respect to requests for expedited processing shall be made by the Executive Director or the delegate of such official.
( 3 ) Appeals should be addressed to: Freedom of Information Appeal, Air Transportation Stabilization Board, Assistant Director, Disclosure Services, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
( d ) *Delivery of process.* Service of process will be received by the Legal Counsel of the Board or the delegate of such official and shall be delivered to the following location: Legal Counsel, Air Transportation Stabilization Board, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., Suite 970, Washington, DC 20005.
#### RICHARDS v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 17, 1915.)

Appeal from Houston Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin,. Attorney General, and W. H. Mitci-iell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Thomas, J.

Appeal dismissed on authority of *Trautwine v. State, infra,*69 South. 399.
§ 1204.501 Delegation of authority—to take actions in real estate and related matters. ( a ) *Delegation of authority.* The Assistant Administrator for the Office of Strategic Infrastructure and the Director, Facilities and Real Estate Division, are delegated authority, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and subject to conditions imposed by immediate superiors, to: ( 1 ) Prescribe agency real estate policies, procedures, and regulations;
( 2 ) Enter into and take other actions including, but not limited to, the following; ( i ) Acquire (by purchase, lease, condemnation, or otherwise) fee and lesser interests in real property and, in the case of acquisition by condemnation, sign declarations of taking.
( ii ) Use, with their consent, the facilities of Federal and other agencies with or without reimbursement, in accordance with statutory authority.
( iii ) Determine entitlement to and quantum of, financial compensation under, and otherwise exercise the authority contained in the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4601), and regulations in implementation thereof.
( iv ) Grant easements, leaseholds, licenses, permits, or other interests (wherever located) in or over real property owned or controlled by NASA.
( v ) Grant the use of NASA-owned or -controlled real property and approve the acquisition and use of nongovernment owned real property for any NASA-related, nonappropriated fund activity purpose with the concurrence of the NASA Office of the Chief Financial Officer.
( vi ) Sell and otherwise dispose of real property in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (40 U.S.C. 471, et seq).
( vii ) Exercise control over the acquisition, utilization, and disposal of movable/relocatable structures including prefabricated buildings, commercial packaged accommodations, trailers, and other like items used as facility substitutes.
( viii ) Request other government agencies to act as real estate agent for NASA.
( ix ) Authorize other NASA officials to take specific implementing action with regard to any real property transaction included in the scope of authority delegated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( b ) *Redelegation.* ( 1 ) The authority delegated in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may not be redelegated.
( 2 ) The authority delegated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section may be redelegated with power of further redelegation.
( c ) *Reporting.* The officials to whom authority is delegated in this section shall ensure that feedback is provided to keep the Administrator fully and currently informed of significant actions, problems, or other matters of substance related to the exercise of the authority delegated hereunder.
[51 FR 26862, July 28, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 57592, Nov. 13, 1991; 79 FR 11319, Feb. 28, 2014; 89 FR 26758, Apr. 16, 2024]