alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




I, William S. Hummers III, the Executive Vice President and Principal Financial
Officer of The South Financial Group, Inc. ("TSFG") certify that to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2005 of TSFG (the "Report"):


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         TSFG.


/s/ William S. Hummers III
-------------------------------
William S. Hummers III
Executive Vice President and Principal Financial Officer
The South Financial Group, Inc.
August 9, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to The South Financial Group, Inc.
and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24468 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:51:06 Desc: MainDocument Page 1 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24468 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:51:06 Desc: MainDocument Page 2 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24468 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:51:06 Desc: MainDocument Page 3 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24468 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:51:06 Desc: MainDocument Page 4 of 5Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24468 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:51:06 Desc: MainDocument Page 5 of 5
# Official Journal C 430/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 430 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 571 December 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 430

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 571 December 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2014/C 430/01 | Consolidated version of Council Decision of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis | 1 |
| 2014/C 430/02 | Consolidated version of Council Decision of 22 December 2004 on the putting into effect of parts of the Schengen acquis by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 6 |
| 2014/C 430/03 | List of Union acts adopted before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters which cease to apply to the United Kingdom as from 1 December 2014 pursuant to Article 10(4), second sentence, of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions | 17 |
| 2014/C 430/04 | List of Union acts adopted before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters which have been amended by an act applicable to the United Kingdom adopted after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and which therefore remain applicable to the United Kingdom as amended or replaced | 23 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2014/C 430/01

Consolidated version of Council Decision of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis

acquis

1

2014/C 430/02

Consolidated version of Council Decision of 22 December 2004 on the putting into effect of parts of the Schengen acquis by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

acquis

6

2014/C 430/03

List of Union acts adopted before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters which cease to apply to the United Kingdom as from 1 December 2014 pursuant to Article 10(4), second sentence, of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions

17

2014/C 430/04

List of Union acts adopted before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters which have been amended by an act applicable to the United Kingdom adopted after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and which therefore remain applicable to the United Kingdom as amended or replaced

23

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Ulman Estate

*Sidney Simon,*for petitioner.

October 23, 1957.

Williams, P. J.,

— Samuel E. Ulman died a resident of Lycoming County, leaving a will, paragraph seven of which reads as follows:

> “I give and bequeath to the West Branch National Bank of Williamsport, Pa., as Trustee for Congregation Beth Ha-Shalom, the sum of Five thousand dollars ($5000.00) payable at the death of my wife, without interest, in trust, nevertheless, that the said Trustee shall invest, and from time to time re-invest the said sum in interest bearing securities, and pay the net *620income thereof to the said Congregation Beth Ha-Shalom, of Williamsport, Pa., for the maintenance of the Church, and should such Congregation at any time cease to exist, then the whole of said principal sum with accrued and undistributed interest, shall be distributed among such non-sectarian charities of the City of Williamsport, as the said Trustee may designate.”

At . the present time the West Branch Bank and Trust Company is the trustee of the fund set up in paragraph seven of Ulman’s will. The principal amount of the fund at the present time is $956.79. The Congregation Beth Ha-Shalom has petitioned this court to terminate this trust because it has failed in its purpose. The trustee does not object to this termination because of the smallness of the income.

In the opinion of the court the amount is so small that the congregation would not, under any circumstances, receive worthwhile or substantial benefits. We are of the opinion that it would be impracticable to preserve the trust. De minimis non curat lex: Bristol-Myers Company v. Lit Brothers, Inc., 336 Pa. 81; Brown Trust, 10 D. & C. 2d 93.

We are of the opinion that the Congregation Beth Ha-Shalom should receive the entire fund. There is in the will a provision that if the congregation ceases to exist, then the principal is to be distributed among nonsectarian charities of Williamsport as the trustee may designate. We are of the opinion that the congregation will never cease to exist and that such a contingency is remote indeed.

And now,. October 23, 1957, the trust made by paragraph seven of the last will and testament of Samuel E. Ulman is terminated. The West Branch Bank and Trust Company is hereby directed to distribute the proceeds of said trust in its hands, to Congregation Beth Ha-Shalom, after all proper charges and expenses have been paid.
Exhibit 10.8(c)



 
Exhibit 10.8(c)

 
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT
(this “Amendment”) is made as of this 30th day of April, 2003 to that certain AMENDED AND RESTATED
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of May 15, 2002 (the “Employment Agreement”), by and between DAVID E. ULLMAN (“Employee”) and JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (“Employer”). 
 
FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy
of which are hereby acknowledged, Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to the Employment Agreement, hereby amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 
 
1. Subject to earlier termination otherwise set forth in the Employment Agreement, the last day of the Employment Period shall be January
31, 2005. 
 
2. Effective March 3, 2003,
Employee’s Base Salary shall be $240,000. 
 
Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the remainder of the
Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respective meanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement. This Amendment shall hereafter be deemed
a part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes. 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 
 

	 JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC.
	 	 	 	 
	
	 By:
	 	 /s/ ROBERT N.
WILDRICK        

	 	 	 	 	 	 /s/ DAVID E.
ULLMAN        


	 	 	 Robert N. Wildrick
	 	 	 	 	 	 DAVID E. ULLMAN

	 	 	 Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chell Group  Corporation
(the  "Company")  for the  period  ending  November  30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
Bolink, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to (S) 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                              By: /s/ David Bolink
                                  ---------------------------------
                                  DAVID BOLINK
                                  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

November 30, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chell Group  Corporation  and will
be retained by Chell Group  Corporation  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                      -23-
#### § 151.23 Procedures: Application; funding information.

Each sponsor must state in its application that it has on hand, or show that it can obtain as needed, funds to pay all estimated costs of the proposed project that are not borne by the United States or by another sponsor. If any of the funds are to be furnished to a sponsor, or used to pay project costs on behalf of a sponsor, by a State agency or any other public agency that is not a sponsor of the project, that agency may, instead of the sponsor, submit evidence that the funds will be provided if the project is approved.

[Doc. No. 1329, 27 FR 12351, Dec. 13, 1962, as amended by Amdt. 151-34, 34 FR 12883, Aug. 8, 1969]
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(b)


                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                        CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC NONEMPLOYEE
                    DIRECTORS SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION PLAN

                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (the "Company") has established the
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc Nonemployee Directors Supplemental Compensation Plan (the
"Plan") effective as of July 1, 1995; and

     WHEREAS, the Company adopted the First Amendment to the Plan as of January
1, 1999; and

     WHEREAS, Section 1.2 of the Plan provides that the Company may amend,
suspend or terminate the Plan with the prior approval of a majority of the
Directors present at a meeting of the Board of Directors, at which a "quorum"
(as defined in the Regulations of the Company) is present; and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to provide an offer of an
immediate voluntary lump sum cash-out election of the present value of the
accrued deferred benefit under the Plan to all Participants.

     NOW, THEREFORE, by approval of the Board of Directors of the Company, the
Plan is hereby amended, effective January 14, 2003 as follows:

     1.   Section 3 of the Plan is amended to add a new Section 3.3 as follows:

          3.3 Lump Sum Payment Election of Post-Retirement Income.
          Notwithstanding the form of quarterly installment distributions
          provided in Section 3.2 above, during the period beginning on February
          1, 2003 and ending on February 28, 2003 a Participant may voluntarily
          elect by written notice filed with the Company to receive from the
          Company payment of such Participant's post-retirement income benefits
          in a single lump sum. Payment of a Participant's




                                       1
<PAGE>


          lump sum benefit shall be payable on or about June 30, 2003. Amounts
          payable under Section 3.2 for purposes of the Participant's
          distribution shall be converted into a lump sum equivalent actuarial
          value as of December 31, 2002, (the "Lump Sum Benefit"). The Lump Sum
          Benefit shall be determined by the Company based on the Pension
          Benefit Guaranty Corporation interest rate for immediate annuities in
          effect for December, 2002 and the 2000 Annuity Mortality Table.

     2.   Effective Date. This Second Amendment shall be effective on January
          14, 2003.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc, pursuant to the order of its
Board of Directors, has executed this Second Amendment to the Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc Nonemployee Directors Supplemental Compensation Plan at Cleveland, Ohio, as
of the 14th day of January, 2003.


                                        CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC



                                        By:      /s/ J. S. Brinzo
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer














                                       2
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 17, 2009

0610 

# Order

June 17, 2009

138550 & (51)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138550 COA: 286992 Berrien CC: 2005-401979-FH EDWARD PINKNEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of April 2, 2009 , the Berrien Circuit Court was directed to articulate specific reasons for imposing a “24/7 curfew” on the defendant and to file with the Clerk of the Supreme Court a transcript and related documents, if any, w ithin 14 days of the completion of the proceedings on remand. On order of the Court, the transcript having been received, the motion for renewed imme diate consideration is GRANTED, and the application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is DENIED, because we are not pe rsuaded that the question pr esented should be reviewed by this Court.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****NASA materials for advanced turbineengines: project completion report, project 1**
 
v1,pt1 | v1, p2 | v2,p1| v2,p2
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:159462, NAS 1.26:159564, NAS 1.26:159802, NAS 1.26:165142
Item Number:0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000971622
November 9, 2018
# **EXHIBIT32.1**

# ** **

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersignedofficer of The Doe Run Resources Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify,to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The annual report on Form10-K for the year ended October 31, 2005, of the Company, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Date: March 21, 2006

 

 
| By:                                      | /s/ Jeffrey L. Zelms |   |   |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|--------|
| Jeffrey L. Zelms                         |                 |
| President & Chief  Executive Officer |                 |

 

----
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,760-01

EX PARTE DYLAN TAYLOR, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 67515 IN THE 23 DISTRICT COURT RD

FROM BRAZORIA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of having a

prohibited item in a correctional facility and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. He did not

appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contends that a judgment nunc pro tunc entered in this cause is improper because

it was signed after he had discharged the sentence. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might

entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte

Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for
2

findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §

3(d). 

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

 The trial court shall make supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard

to whether the cumulation order was orally pronounced on the day of sentencing. The trial court

shall supplement the record with a copy of the trial transcript, if available. The trial court shall also

make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the

disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 16, 2015

Do not publish
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7529
BOBBY SESSIONS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-110-2-20AJ) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby Sessions, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district courtorder based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate r eview. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Weaccordingly deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1264.133 Evidence. ( a ) The presiding officer shall determine the admissibility of evidence.
( b ) Except as provided herein, the presiding officer shall not be bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the presiding officer may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence where appropriate, e.g., to exclude unreliable evidence.
( c ) The presiding officer shall exclude irrelevant and immaterial evidence.
( d ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( e ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if it is privileged under Federal law.
( f ) Evidence concerning offers of compromise or settlement shall be inadmissible to the extent provided in Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
( g ) The presiding officer shall permit the parties to introduce rebuttal witnesses and evidence.
( h ) All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record shall be open to examination by all parties, unless otherwise ordered by the presiding officer pursuant to § 1264.123.
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3846 

AN ACT 

To observe the lives lost in the United States due to the 

COVID–19 pandemic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3846 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Pandemic 

3 Moment of Silence Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR THE VICTIMS OF THE 

5 COVID–19 PANDEMIC. 

6 The President shall issue a proclamation calling on 

7 the people of the United States to observe a moment of 

8 silence at 12:00pm (local time) on Monday, June 1, 2020, 

9 as a mark of respect to the memory of the more than 

10 100,000 lives lost in the United States due to the COVID– 

11 19 pandemic, and their families. 

Passed the Senate June 1, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3846 

AN ACT 

To observe the lives lost in the United States due 

to the COVID–19 pandemic.