alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED,
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS AS OF MAY
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q 1ST
QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 1998 LAROCHE INDUSTRIES, INC.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                       687
<INVENTORY>                                     27,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,497
<PP&E>                                         279,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,167
<BONDS>                                        104,441
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,327
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   304,279
<SALES>                                        110,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,663
<CGS>                                           90,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    89
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,978
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,967
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,967
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 145.107 Satellite repair stations. ( a ) A certificated repair station under the managerial control of another certificated repair station may operate as a satellite repair station with its own certificate issued by the FAA. A satellite repair station— ( 1 ) May not hold a rating not held by the certificated repair station with managerial control;
( 2 ) Must meet the requirements for each rating it holds;
( 3 ) Must submit a repair station manual acceptable to the FAA as required by § 145.207; and
( 4 ) Must submit a quality control manual acceptable to the FAA as required by § 145.211(c).
( b ) Unless the FAA indicates otherwise, personnel and equipment from the certificated repair station with managerial control and from each of the satellite repair stations may be shared. However, inspection personnel must be designated for each satellite repair station and available at the satellite repair station any time a determination of airworthiness or return to service is made. In other circumstances, inspection personnel may be away from the premises but must be available by telephone, radio, or other electronic means.
( c ) A satellite repair station may not be located in a country other than the domicile country of the certificated repair station with managerial control.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7896

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DONALD LEE SIMPSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief

District Judge. (CR-92-20-F, CA-95-158-7-F)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 29, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Lee Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Simpson, Nos. CR-92-20-F; CA-95-158-7-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3340 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3340

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
   To redesignate the facilities of the United States Postal Service 
 located at 7715 and 7748 S. Cottage Grove Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, 
   as the ``James E. Worsham Post Office'' and the ``James E. Worsham 
     Carrier Annex Building'', respectively, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES E. WORSHAM POST OFFICE.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 7715 S. Cottage Grove Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, 
shall be known and designated as the ``James E. Worsham Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in this section shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James E. 
Worsham Post Office''.

SEC. 2. JAMES E. WORSHAM CARRIER ANNEX BUILDING.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 7748 S. Cottage Grove Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, 
shall be known and designated as the ``James E. Worsham Carrier Annex 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in this section shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James E. 
Worsham Carrier Annex Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### § 17.47 Reconsideration.

The ODRA will not entertain requests for reconsideration as a routine matter, or where such requests evidence mere disagreement with a decision or restatements of previous arguments. A party seeking reconsideration must demonstrate either clear errors of fact or law in the underlying decision or previously unavailable evidence that warrants reversal or modification of the decision. In order to be considered, requests for reconsideration must be filed within ten (10) business days of the date of issuance of the public version of the subject decision or order.
TRTM_FLUID_TYPE TRTM_FLUID

A ACID

ABF ACID BRINE FRAC

ACFR ACIDFRAC / MURICFRAC / DOLOFRAC / DUOFRAC

ACHL ALCHOHOL / METHANOL

ACID ACIDIZE

AFR *

AGFR ACIDGELFRACB

BAFR BEADACIDFRAC

BDA BREAKDOWN ACID

BGFR BEADGELFRAC

BKDN BREAKDOWN

BOFR BEADOILFRAC

BWFR BEADWATERFRAC

BXGF BAUXITE GELFRAC

CO2 CARBON DIOXIDE

COND CONDENSATE / DISTILLATE

DOC DIESEL OIL CEMENT SQUEEZE

DOIL DIESEL OIL

F FOAM

FFR FOAM FRAC

FLUD FLUID

FRAC FRACTURING

G GAS

GEL GEL

GFR GELFRAC

GOF GEOFRAC

HEAT HEAT

KCL POTASSIUM CHLORIDE

KERO KEROSENE

MA MUD ACID

MAF MUD ACID FRAC

NAF NITROGEN ACID FRAC

NTFR NITROGEN FRAC

NTGN NITROGEN

O OIL

OFR OILFRAC / VISOFRAC / STRATOFRAC / PETROGEL

OFRA *

OIL OIL

PERF PERFORATIONS IN OPENHOLE

Q *

SAFR SANDACIDFRAC / MURICFRAC / DOLOFRAC / DUOFRAC

SAGF SANDACIDGELFRAC

SBGF SANDBEADGELFRAC

SCFR SANDCO2FRAC

SDFR SANDFRAC

SEFR SANDEMULSIONFRAC
SFAC SURFACTANT

SFFR SANDFOAMFRAC

SFRA *

SGAF SANDGASFRAC

SGFR SANDGELFRAC

SGOF SANDGEOFRAC

SKFR SANDKEROSENEFRAC

SLKW SLICK WATER

SOFR SDOILFRAC / VISOFRAC / STRATOFRAC / PETROGEL

SWF *

SWFR SDWTRFRAC / MY-T-FRAC / ULTRAFRAC / WIDEFRAC / DOWELLFRAC

SWNF SALT WATER NITROGEN FRAC

TRET TREATMENT

TRT TREATMENT UNDESIGNATED

U UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN UNKNOWN

VBFR VIBRAFRAC

W WATER

WFR WATERFRAC / MY-T-FRAC / ULTRAFRAC / WIDEFRAC / DOWELLFRAC

WTFR *

WTR WATER

X-LINKGEL X-LINK GEL

XPLO EXPLOSIVE NITROGLYCERINE

*not defined in the original source of data (IHS E

e original source of data (IHS Energy, 2011, Petroleum Information Data Model (PIDM) 2.5 data management system: IHS, Inc. [Available 

ment system: IHS, Inc. [Available from IHS, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112.])
§ 161.101 Scope. ( a ) This subpart applies to an airport operator's noise or access restriction on the operation of Stage 3 aircraft that is implemented pursuant to an agreement between an airport operator and all aircraft operators affected by the proposed restriction that are serving or will be serving such airport within 180 days of the date of the proposed restriction.
( b ) For purposes of this subpart, an agreement shall be in writing and signed by: ( 1 ) The airport operator;
( 2 ) Those aircraft operators currently operating at the airport who would be affected by the noise or access restriction; and
( 3 ) All new entrants that have submitted the information required under § 161.105(a) of this part.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to restrictions exempted in § 161.7 of this part.
( d ) This subpart does not limit the right of an airport operator to enter into an agreement with one or more aircraft operators that restricts the operation of Stage 2 or Stage 3 aircraft as long as the restriction is not enforced against aircraft operators that are not party to the agreement. Such an agreement is not covered by this subpart except that an aircraft operator may apply for sanctions pursuant to subpart F of this part for restrictions the airport operator seeks to impose other than those in the agreement.
10

8

7

6

9

5

4 

3

2

1

make healthier 

holiday choices

10 tips for a healthier holiday

The holidays are often filled with time-honored traditions that include some of our favorite meals and foods.

As you celebrate, think of little changes you can make this holiday season to create healthier meals and active days.

10

tips

Nutrition 

Education Series

 

Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Go to www.ChooseMyPlate.gov 

for more information.

 

DG TipSheet No. 32 

December 2013

Fruits Grains

Vegetables Protein

Dairy

United States Department of Agriculture

create MyPlate makeovers

Makeover your favorite holiday dishes. 

Use My Recipe on SuperTracker to 

improve holiday recipes and get healthier 

results. Go to https://www.supertracker.usda.gov/myrecipe.aspx.

 

 enjoy all the food groups at your

celebration

Prepare whole-grain crackers with hummus as an 

appetizer; add unsalted nuts and black beans to a green-leaf 

salad; use low-fat milk instead of heavy cream in your 

casseroles. Share healthier options during your holiday meal.

make sure your protein is lean

 Turkey; roast beef; fresh ham; beans; and some 

	 types of fish, such as cod or flounder, are lean protein

choices. When serving meats, trim away any fat before 

cooking. Go easy on the sauces and gravies―they can be

high in saturated fat and sodium.

 cheers to good health Quench your thirst with low-calorie options. 

Drink water with lemon or lime slices. Offer 

seltzer water with a splash of 100% fruit juice.

bake healthier Use recipes with unsweetened applesauce or mashed 

ripe bananas instead of butter. Try cutting the amount 

of sugar listed in recipes in half. Use spices to 

add flavor such as cinnamon, allspice, or

nutmeg instead of salt.

tweak the sweet

 For dessert, try baked apples with cinnamon 

and a sprinkle of sugar instead of apple pie. 

Invite your guests to make their own parfait with 

colorful sliced fruit and low-fat yogurt.

 be the life of the party Laugh, mingle, dance, and play games. Focus on fun

 and enjoy the company of others.

make exercise a part of the fun

Make being active part of your holiday tradition. Have 

fun walking and talking with family and friends after a 

holiday meal. Give gifts that encourage others to 

practice healthy habits such as workout DVDs, 

running shoes, and reusable water bottles.

enjoy leftovers Create delicious new meals with your leftovers. Add 

 turkey to soups or salads. Use extra veggies in omelets, 

sandwiches, or stews. The possibilities are endless!

 

 give to others

 Spend time providing foods or preparing meals 

 for those who may need a little help. Give food 

to a local food bank or volunteer to serve meals at a shelter 

during the holiday season.
**Exhibit      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

| (1)   | The                report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                        |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                registrant.  |

| April                27, 2007                                          |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                   |   |
|                                                                   |   |
| /s/                Jeffrey R. Immelt                                   |   |
| Jeffrey                R. ImmeltChief                Executive Officer |   |
|                                                         |   |
| /s/                Keith S. Sherin                                     |   |
| Keith                S. SherinChief                Financial Officer   |   |
# C_2015205EN.01001101.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 April 2015 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-114/14) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Value added tax - Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 132(1)(a) and 135(1)(h) - Exemptions - Public postal services - Postage stamps - Directive 97/67/CE))

(2015/C 205/14)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Enegren and L. Lozano Palacios, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: U. Persson and A. Falk, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to exempt from value added tax the supply by the public postal services of services other than passenger transport and telecommunications services, and the supply of goods incidental thereto, and the supply at face value of postage stamps valid for use for postal services within national territory, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 132(1)(a) and 135(1)(h) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to exempt from value added tax the supply by the public postal services of services other than passenger transport and telecommunications services, and the supply of goods incidental thereto, and the supply at face value of postage stamps valid for use for postal services within national territory, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 132(1)(a) and 135(1)(h) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 23

                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants

      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our reports dated November 9, 1999 (except with respect to the
matter discussed in Note 14, as to which the date is December 16, 1999) included
in or incorporated by reference into ThermoLase Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 1999, into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements as follows:  Registration Statement No. 33-88396
on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-88398 on Form S-8, Registration
Statement No. 33-88394 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-88400 on Form
S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-80749 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
33-84516 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-94658 on Form S-3,
Registration Statement No. 333-19633 on Form S-4, and Registration Statement No.
333-70605 on Form S-8.



                                           Arthur Andersen LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
December 17, 1999
Page 1 of 2

In Re: Financial Oversight & Management Board

for Puerto Rico

as representative of

3:17‐BK‐3283 (LTS)

PROMESA Title III  

(Jointly Administrated)

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al.

Debtors

NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE PLEADING

(Notificación de Documento Defectuoso)

The Clerk of Court has received your pleading on 5/22/2023. However, the deficiencies listed

below have prevented us from filing the same in the case docket. You must submit a corrected

pleading if you want it to form part of the record.

La Secretaría del Tribunal recibió su escrito el 22 de mayo del 2023. No obstante, las deficiencias

que abajo se señalan nos impiden aceptarlo y entrarlo en el sumario del caso. Debe usted

someter un escrito debidamente corregido si quiere que el mismo forme parte del expediente.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24310 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/24/23 18:29:48 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 4
NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE PLEADING  

(Notificación de Documento Defectuoso)

3:17‐BK‐3283 (LTS)

Page 2 of 2

1 Pleading is illegible. L.Civ.R. 10

(El escrito radicado es ilegible o no cumple con la R.L.Civ. 10)

2

Lacks proper signature. Documents presented to the court in paper

require a handwritten signature. L.Civ.R. 11

(Documento no está firmado adecuadamente. Los documentos sometidos en papel tienen que estar firmados

a mano. R.L.Civ. 11)

3

PROMESA Cover Sheet for Adversary Proceedings (DPR Modified

PROMESA B1040) was not included. L.Bkcy.R. 7003‐1

http://www.prd.uscourts.gov/promesa/forms‐attorneys

(No se incluyó la Hoja de Trámite para Casos Adversarios (DPR Modified PROMESA B1040).  

4

Failure to pay the filing fee in the amount of $402.00. See, L.Cv.R. 3(a).

Payment shall be made within 24 hours in person at the Clerk’s Office

U.S. District Court with copy of the complaint /notice of removal.

(Incumplimiento con el pago de la cuota de radicación por la cantidad de $400.00. El pago debe hacerse

personalmente dentro de 24 horas en la Secretaría del Tribunal Federal de Distrito adjuntando una copia de

la demanda / notificación de remoción.)

5 X

The attached document is non‐compliant with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(3)(A)

and L. Cv. R. 5(a). Counsel is required to file the document electronically

via CM/ECF.

(El documento adjunto no cumple con Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 (d) (3) (A) y L. Cv. R. 5 (a). El

abogado debe presentar el documento electrónicamente a través de CM / ECF.)

6 Other:  

Date:  May 24, 2023

ADA I. GARCIA-RIVERA, ESQ.

Clerk of Court

By: s/ Idnar Díaz-García

Idnar Diaz-Garcia 

Deputy Clerk

sc: to filer with original filing attached

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24310 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/24/23 18:29:48 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24310 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/24/23 18:29:48 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24310 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/24/23 18:29:48 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 4
§ 1240.110 Recommendation to, and action by, the Administrator. ( a ) Upon a determination by the Board that a contribution merits an award, the Board will recommend to the Administrator or a designee the terms and conditions of the proposed award, including a specific amount and distribution thereof for any multiple contributors. The recommendation of the Board to the Administrator or designee will reflect the views of the majority of the Board members. Dissenting views may be transmitted with the majority opinion.
( b ) The granting, denying or modification of any Board recommended award under this subpart will be at the sole discretion of the Administrator or his designee, who will determine the final terms and conditions of each award after consideration of the criteria in § 1240.103.
( c ) In addition, the Board may recommend, and the Administrator or his designee may grant, non-monetary awards under other applicable laws and regulations.
[67 FR 31120, May 9, 2002, as amended at 77 FR 27367, May 10, 2012]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131613 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131613 COA: 268377 Wayne CC: 04-010648, RAHMAN ABDUL-RAHL GILLESPIE, 05-005770 Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
#### § 135.111 Second in command required in Category II operations.

No person may operate an aircraft in a Category II operation unless there is a second in command of the aircraft.