alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Mark J. Ferrer, the chief executive officer of Critical Path, Inc. (the
Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 31, 2005



/S/    MARK J.
FERRERMark J. Ferrer Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board




A signed original of this
written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### RE: Step 3 rule - regulatory language added Kymn, Christine J. to: Juan Santiago 02/24/2012 02:53 PM Cc: Anna Wood, Howard Hoffman, Kristi Smith, MichaelS Brooks, Lynn Hutchinson, Paul Balserak, Pam Long, "Ghorbi, Darian" From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine

_J.

_ Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kristi Smith/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, MichaelS Brooks /RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lynn Hutchinson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Pam 1 attachment

Interagencycomments3 EO 1286613563 EPA NPRM Tailoring Step3 022412.docx

Thanks, Juan. We will let you know if there is any follow up on this most recent draft. In the interest of time, I've attached follow up comments received thus far. These comments are based on the draft distributed yesterday evening. Because of the comment consolidation process, it will be difficult to discern what's new in the attached. As such, I'm providing this reference list of follow up comments/suggested edits as a legend: 1) Comment A8, P. 11. Reviewer has requested that EPA address prior comment that appears to lack response. 2) A12, p. 13. Suggested fn edit. 3) A59, p. 31. Section V.A. Suggested edit in second to last para. 4) A60-62, p. 31. Multiple reviewers suggested edits to economics conditions discussion. 5) A67, p. 40. Suggested further clarification for para. Starting "Importantly" 6) A79, p. 42. Placeholder comment re: removing TSD reference 7) A143-144, p. 58-59. Multiple reviewers suggested edit to provide further CFR cross-reference cites on proposed PALs amendments in order to provide notice to the public. 8) A 148-49, p. 76. Placeholder comment re: removing TSD reference and increased specificity of on proposed CFR changes for notice purposes. 9) p. 84 - correction of typo to "intall" Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Christine -----Original Message----- From: Juan Santiago [mailto:Santiago.Juan@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 1:30 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Anna Wood; Howard Hoffman; Kristi Smith; MichaelS Brooks; Lynn Hutchinson; Paul Balserak; Pam Long Subject: Step 3 rule - regulatory language added

Christine, Per our conversation earlier today, attached is a complete version of the Step 3 rule that incorporates the regulatory text that was originally going to bein the docket. The references in the text to the docket item have been removed. In addition, we have added language to comply with the January 4, 2012 memorandum on "Clarifying Regulatory Requirements: Executive Summaries". Please contact me if you have any questions.
Thanks! Juan E. Santiago

(See attached file: Revised Step 3 Draft - OMB comment response plus reg text 2-24-12.docx)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1226 

KA 15-00736 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

SAMUEL RIVALDO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (DANIEL GROSS OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Douglas A.

Randall, J.), entered March 28, 2014. The judgment revoked

defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of

imprisonment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit D 

Budget and Staffing Plan

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24599-4 Filed:06/16/23 Entered:06/16/23 17:24:26 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 1 of 5
Exhibit D-1 

Budget Plan for the Compensation Period

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24599-4 Filed:06/16/23 Entered:06/16/23 17:24:26 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 2 of 5
Actual Fees Estimated Fees Actual Fees Estimated Fees Actual Fees Estimated Fee

33260.0009 PROMESA TITLE III: HTA $ 500,000.00 461,322.90 $ 528,132.70 $ 600,000.00 $ 536,443.20 $ 600,000.0

$ 

33260.0053 HTA TITLE III - MISCELLANEOUS 1, $ 5,000.00 507.90 $ 1,330.50 $ 5,000.00 $ 443.50 $ 5,000.0

$ 

$ 505,000.00 462,830.80 $ 529,463.20 $ 605,000.00 $ 536,886.70 $ 605,000.0

$ 

 Percent Variance (Actual vs. Budgeted Fees) HTA TOTAL ESTIMATED FEES Compensation Period (February 2022 - May 2022) TOTAL: 

 ACTUAL FEES Compensation Period (February 2022 - May 2022) TOTAL: 

February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 

Matter No. Matter

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24599-4 Filed:06/16/23 Entered:06/16/23 17:24:26 D

Exhibit D Page 3 of 5
Exhibit D-2 

Staffing Plan for the Compensation Period 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24599-4 Filed:06/16/23 Entered:06/16/23 17:24:26 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 4 of 5
Staffing Plan for the Compensation Period1

Category of Timekeeper2 Number of 

Timekeepers Expected 

to Work on The Matter 

During the Budget Period3

Average Hourly Rate4

Partners 17 $887 

Senior Counsel 7 $887 

Associates 19 $887 

e-Discovery Attorneys 5 $438 

Paraprofessionals 8 $303 

Total: 56 

 

1

 The actual number of timekeepers who worked on this matter during the Compensation Period was 55, and thus 1 

fewer than anticipated. 

2

 Attorney Practice Groups: BSGR&B, Tax, Labor & Employment, Litigation, and Corporate. 

3

 The chart reflects Proskauer’s staffing plan for the designated period based on currently foreseeable activities. 

Actual staffing needs, including additional attorneys, may vary materially based on actual facts and circumstances 

arising in the designated period, including as a result of currently unanticipated disputes. The staffing plan 

currently includes attorneys from the BSGR&B, Tax, Labor & Employment, Litigation, and Corporate practice 

groups. The expertise of attorneys from other specialized areas is likely to be required during the course of these 

PROMESA Title III cases. 

4

 Pursuant to the Engagement Letter, Proskauer’s rates increased 4% effective January 1, 2022, yielding a new flat 

rate for attorneys (partners, senior counsel, and associates) of $887 per hour, for e-discovery attorneys of $438 per 

hour, and for paraprofessionals of $303 per hour. Rates have not increased during this Compensation Period. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24599-4 Filed:06/16/23 Entered:06/16/23 17:24:26 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 5 of 5
§ 125.215 Operating information required. ( a ) The operator of an airplane must provide the following materials, in current and appropriate form, accessible to the pilot at the pilot station, and the pilot shall use them: ( 1 ) A cockpit checklist.
( 2 ) An emergency cockpit checklist containing the procedures required by paragraph (c) of this section, as appropriate.
( 3 ) Pertinent aeronautical charts.
( 4 ) For IFR operations, each pertinent navigational en route, terminal area, and approach and letdown chart;
( 5 ) One-engine-inoperative climb performance data and, if the airplane is approved for use in IFR or over-the-top operations, that data must be sufficient to enable the pilot to determine that the airplane is capable of carrying passengers over-the-top or in IFR conditions at a weight that will allow it to climb, with the critical engine inoperative, at least 50 feet a minute when operating at the MEA's of the route to be flown or 5,000 feet MSL, whichever is higher.
( b ) Each cockpit checklist required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section must contain the following procedures: ( 1 ) Before starting engines;
( 2 ) Before take-off;
( 3 ) Cruise;
( 4 ) Before landing;
( 5 ) After landing;
( 6 ) Stopping engines.
( c ) Each emergency cockpit checklist required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section must contain the following procedures, as appropriate: ( 1 ) Emergency operation of fuel, hydraulic, electrical, and mechanical systems.
( 2 ) Emergency operation of instruments and controls.
( 3 ) Engine inoperative procedures.
( 4 ) Any other emergency procedures necessary for safety.
§ 1206.602 Opportunity to object to disclosure. ( a ) If a submitter has any objections to the disclosure of commercial information, the submitter must provide a detailed written statement to the FOIA office that specifies all factual and/or legal grounds for withholding the particular information under any FOIA exemptions.
( b ) The submitter must include a daytime telephone number, an email and mailing address, and a fax number if available on a response to the FOIA office.
( c ) A submitter who does not respond within the time period specified under this subpart will be considered to have no objection to disclosure of the information.
( d ) Responses received by the FOIA office after the time period specified in § 1206.601(b)(4) will not be considered by the FOIA office. An extension of time to respond may be granted provided the submitter provides an explanation justifying additional time within the time period specified in § 1206.601(b)(4).
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In Re: Financial Oversight & Management Board

for Puerto Rico

as representative of

3:17-BK-3283 (LTS)

PROMESA Title III 

(Jointly Administrated)

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al.,

Debtors

NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE PLEADING

(Notificación de Documento Defectuoso)

The Clerk of Court has received your pleading on June 21, 2023. However, the deficiencies listed 

below have prevented us from filing the same in the case docket. You must submit a corrected 

pleading if you want it to form part of the record.

La Secretaría del Tribunal recibió su escrito el 21 de junio del 2023. No obstante, las deficiencias 

que abajo se señalan nos impiden aceptarlo y entrarlo en el sumario del caso. Debe usted 

someter un escrito debidamente corregido si quiere que el mismo forme parte del expediente.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24629 Filed:06/21/23 Entered:06/21/23 16:35:17 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE PLEADING

(Notificación de Documento Defectuoso)

3:17-BK-3283 (LTS)

Page 2 of 2

1 Pleading is illegible. L.Civ.R. 10

(El escrito radicado es ilegible o no cumple con la R.L.Civ. 10)

2 X

Lacks proper signature. Documents presented to the court in paper 

require a handwritten signature. L.Civ.R. 11

(Documento no está firmado adecuadamente. Los documentos sometidos en papel tienen que estar firmados 

a mano. R.L.Civ. 11)

3

PROMESA Cover Sheet for Adversary Proceedings (DPR Modified 

PROMESA B1040) was not included. L.Bkcy.R. 7003-1

http://www.prd.uscourts.gov/promesa/forms-attorneys

(No se incluyó la Hoja de Trámite para Casos Adversarios (DPR Modified PROMESA B1040). 

4

Please blackout or omit from ALL documents any personal information 

such as: medical information, Social Security number, financial account 

numbers, date of birth, driver’s license, or any other personal identifying 

numbers as per Local Civil Rule 5.2

(Otro:) Favor de eliminar u omitir de TODOS sus documentos cualquier información personal como: 

información, número de Seguro Social, números de cuentas financieras, fecha de nacimiento, licencia de 

conducir o cualquier otro número de identificación de acuerdo con la Regla Local Civil 5.2.

5

Other: No written motion, document or pleading was presented to the 

Court for consideration. L.Civ.R.7(a).

(No se presentó moción, documento o petición por escrito para la consideración de la 

Corte. R.L.Civ.7(a)).

Date: June 21, 2023

ADA I. GARCÍA-RIVERA, ESQ., CPA

Clerk of Court

 By: s/ Carmen Tacoronte

Carmen Tacoronte

Deputy Clerk

sc: to filer with original filing attached

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24629 Filed:06/21/23 Entered:06/21/23 16:35:17 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Blair Zykan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TDI Holding Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 15, 2003


/s/ Blair Zykan
-----------------------
Blair Zykan,
President & CFO
**Exhibit 23**
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
The Board of Directors     MTI TechnologyCorporation:
     We consent to incorporation by reference in theregistration statements No. 333-85410 on Form S-3 andthe registration statements (Nos. 333-103065, 333-85410,333-76972, 333-69030, 333-66716, 333-95915, 333-92623,333-85579, 333-61957, 333-46363, 333-50377, 333-18501 and33-80438) on Form S-8 of MTI Technology Corporation of ourreport dated May 23, 2003, except as to the secondparagraph of note 7, which is as of June 30, 2003,relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MTI TechnologyCorporation and subsidiaries as of April 5, 2003 andApril 6, 2002 and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended April 5, 2003, andrelated schedule, which report appears in the April 5, 2003annual report on Form 10-K of MTI Technology Corporation.Our report refers to a change in method of accounting forgoodwill and intangible assets effective April 8, 2001.
 KPMG LLP    
Costa Mesa, CaliforniaJuly 11, 2003
Exhibit 99


           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Pioneer  Railcorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  we, Guy L.Brenkman,
President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and J. Michael Carr,  Chief  Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Guy L. Brenkman                                /s/ J. Michael Carr
-------------------------------------              ----------------------------
Guy L. Brenkman                                    J. Michael Carr
President and Chief Executive Officer              Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2003



                                       1
Exhibit 32 (i)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005, I, James G. Rakes, President and Chief Executive
Officer of National Bankshares, Inc. (Principal Executive Officer), hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

        (2)the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.



/s/ JAMES G. RAKES
------------------
James G. Rakes
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00066-CV

Antonio SALTON,

Appellant

v.

Alray JOHNSON and Tracey Johnson,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006-CI-08657

Honorable Fred Shannon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 7, 2009

REVERSED AND REMANDED

The appellees have filed a motion, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

42.1(a)(2), stating that the parties have resolved the dispute at issue and requesting this court 

reverse the trial court and remand the matter for a new trial. The appellant has not notified this 

court to the contrary. The motion is granted and the judgment of the trial court is hereby
04-09-00066-CV

- 2 -

reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(2). 

PER CURIAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AARON ERNEST JOHNSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 168 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AARON ERNEST JOHNSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 169 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of December, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24494 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:04:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24494 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:04:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24494 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:04:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24494 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:04:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24494 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:04:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 5
§ 1271.200 Agency and legislative liaison. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 1271.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if the payment is for agency and legislative liaison activities not directly related to a covered Federal action.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, providing any information specifically requested by an agency or Congress is allowable at any time.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agency and legislative liaison activities are allowable at any time only where they are not related to a specific solicitation for any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Discussing with an agency (including individual demonstrations) the qualities and characteristics of the person's products or services, conditions or terms of sale, and service capabilities; and,
( 2 ) Technical discussions and other activities regarding the application or adaptation of the person's products or services for an agency's use.
( d ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agencies and legislative liaison activities are allowable only where they are prior to formal solicitation of any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Providing any information not specifically requested but necessary for an agency to make an informed decision about initiation of a covered Federal action;
( 2 ) Technical discussions regarding the preparation of an unsolicited proposal prior to its official submission; and,
( 3 ) Capability presentations by persons seeking awards from an agency pursuant to the provisions of the Small Business Act, as amended by Public Law 95-507 and other subsequent amendments.
( e ) Only those activities expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.