Federal Register / Vol. 56, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 1991 / Rules and Regulations

Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast

Guard, project attorney, Ninth Coast

Guard District Legal Office.

Discussion of Regulations

The International Bay City River Roar

will be conducted on the Saginaw River

between the Liberty Bridge and the

Veterans Memorial Bridge on the 12th,

13th, and 14th of July 1991. This event

will have an estimated 70 hydroplanes

which could pose hazards to navigation in the area. Any vessel desiring to

transit the regulated area may do so

only with prior approval of the Patrol

Commander (Officer in Charge, U.S.

Coast Guard Station Saginaw River,

MI.).

Economic Assessment and Certification

This regulation is considered to be

non-major under Executive Order 12291

on Federal Regulation and

nonsignificant under Department of

Transportation regulatory policies and

procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,

1979). The economic impact has been

found to be so minimal that a full

regulatory evaluation is unnecessary.

This event will draw a large number of

spectator craft into the area for the

duration of the event. This should have

a favorable impact on commercial

facilities providing services to the

spectators. Any impact on commercial

traffic in the area will be negligible.

Since the impact of this regulation is

expected to be minimal, the Coast

Guard certifies that it will not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities.

Federalism

This action has been analyzed in

accordance with the principles and

criteria contained in Executive Order

12612, and it has been determined that

this rulemaking does not have sufficient

federalism implications to warrant the

preparation of a Federalism

Assessment.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

Marine safety, Navigation (water).

Final Regulations

In consideration of the foregoing, part

100 of title 33, Code of Federal

Regulations, is amended as follcws:

1. The authority citation for part 100

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 49 CFR 1.46 and

33 CFR 100.35.

/. Part 100 would be amended to add a

temporary section 100.35-T0918 to read

as follows:

§ 100.35-T0918 International Bay City

River Roar, Saginaw River, Bay City, ML

(a) Regulated Area. That portion of

the Saginaw River from the Liberty

Bridge on the north to the Veterans

Memorial Bridge on the south.

(b) Special Local Regulations.

(1) The above area will be closed to

navigation and anchorage, except when

expressly authorized by the Coast

Guard Patrol Commander, from 9:30 a.m.

(EDST) until 4 p~m. (EDST) on 12 July

1991, from 9:30 a.m. (EDST) until 4:30

p.m. (EDST) on 13 July 1991, and from

8:30 a.m. (EDST) until 5:30 p.m. (EDST)

on 14 July 1991.

(2) If the weather on 14 July 1991 is

inclement, the river closure will be

postponed until 8:30 a.m. (EDSTJ until

5:30 p.m. (EDST) on 15 July 1991. If

pIostponed, notice will be given on 14

July 1991 over the U.S. Coast Guard

Radio Net.

(3) The Coast Guard will patrol the

regulated area under the direction of a

designated Coast Guard Patrol

Commander. The Patrol Commander

may be contacted on channel 16 (156.8

MHZ) by the call sign "Coast Guard

Patrol Commander". Any vessel, not

authorized to participate in the event,

desiring to transit the regulated area

may do so only with prior approval of

the Patrol Commander and when so

directed by that officer. Transiting

vessels will be operated at bare

steerageway, and will exercise a high

degree of caution in the area.

(4) The Patrol Commander may direct

the anchoring, mooring, or movement of

any boat or vessel within the regulated

area. A succession of sharp, short

signals by whistle or horn from vessels

patrolling the area under the direction of

the U.S. Coast Guard Patrol Commander

shall serve as a signal to stop. Any

vessel so signaled shall stop and shall

comply with the orders of the Patrol

Commander. Failure to do so may result

in expulsion from the area, citation for

failure to comply, or both.

(5) The Patrol Commander may

establish vessel size and speed

limitations, and operating conditions.

(6) The Patrol Commander may

restrict vessel operation within the

regulated area to vessels having

particular operating characteristics.

(7) The Patrol Commander may

terminate the marine event or the

operation of any vessel at any time it is

deemed necessary for the protection of

life and property.

Dated. March 5, 1991.

G.A. Penington,

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guar, Commander,

Ninth Coast Guard DistricL

[FR Doc. 91-6221 Filed 3-14-91; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-14-M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 81

[AD-FRL-3913-12]

Designations and Classifications for

Initial PM-10 Nonattainment Areas

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice announcing designations

and classifications for initial PM-10

nonattainment areas.

SUMMARY: Under section 107(d)(4)(B) of

the Clean Air Act (Act) as amended by

the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990

(Pub. L. No. 101-549, November 15,

1990), certain areas were designated as

nonattainment for the pollutant PM-10

by operation of law upon enactment of

the Amendments. These areas include

"Group" I areas identified at 52 FR 29383

(August 7, 1987) and as subsequently

clarified at 55 FR 45799 (October 31,

1990). Other areas (i.e., Group II or Il

areas) containing sites for which air

quality monitoring data showed a

violation of the national ambient air

quality standards (NAAQS) for PM-10

prior to January 1, 1989 were also

designated nonattainment for PM-10 by

operation of law upon enactment. All

other areas were designated

unclassified for PM-10 by operation of

law. By this notice, EPA is announcing,

as required by section 107(d)(2) of the

amended Act, all of those areas that

were designated nonattainment for PM10 by operation of law on November 15,

1990.

By this notice, EPA is also

announcing, as required by section

188(a) of the amended Act, that all of the

areas designated nonattainment for PM10 by operation of law upon enactment

of the Amendments were classified as

moderate nonattainment areas at that

time. In accordance with section

189(a)(2), States must submit State

implementation plans (SIP's) for these

areas by November 15, 1991.

DATES: Written comments on this notice

must be received by April 15, 1991 at the

address below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: These actions will

become effective on May 14, 1991.

11101

HeinOnline -- 56 Fed. Reg. 11101 1991
Federal Register / Vol. 56, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 1991 / Rules and Regulations

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to Larry D.

Wallace, Particulate Matter Programs

Section, Air Quality Management

Division (MD-15), Office of Air Quality

Planning and Standards, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

The air quality monitoring data

supporting the nonattainment

designation of the former Group II and

III areas monitoring violations of the

PM-10 NAAQS prior to January 1, 1989

are available from the respective EPA

Regional Office which serves the State

where the affected area is located. The

addresses of the Regional Offices are as

follows:

* State Air Programs Branch, EPA Region I,

J.F.K. Federal Building, Boston, MA 02203-

2211

* Air Programs Branch, EPA Region II, 26

Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278

" Air Programs Branch, EPA Region III, 841

Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, PA 19107

" Air Programs Branch, EPA Region IV, 345

Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta, GA 30365

" Air and Radiation Branch, EPA Region V,

230 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL

60604

" Air Programs Branch, EPA Region VI, 1445

Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202-2733

" Air Branch, EPA Region VII, 726 Minnesota

Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66101

" Air Programs Branch, EPA Region VIII, 999

18th Street, Denver Place-Suit 500,

Denver, CO 80202-2405

" Air Programs Branch, EPA Region IX, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105

" Air Programs Branch, EPA Region X, 1200

Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Larry D. Wallace, Particulate Matter

Programs Section, Air Quality

Management Division, Office of Air

Quality Planning and Standards, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, (919)

541-0906 or FTS 629-0906 and at the

address indicated above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

A. 1987 Revision of the NAAQS for

Particulate Matter

On July 1, 1987, EPA revised the

NAAQs for particulate matter, replacing

total suspended particulates (TSP) as

the indicator for particulate matter with

a new indicator that included only those

particles with an aerodynamic diameter

less than or equal to a nominal 10

micrometers (called "PM-10") (52 FR

24634). At the same time, EPA set forth

regulations for implementing the revised

particulate matter standards and

announced EPA's SIP development

policy on PM-10 control strategies

necessary to assure attainment and

maintenance of the PM-10 NAAQS (see

generally .52 FR 24672). The EPA

adopted a PM-10 SIP development

policy dividing all areas of the country

into three categories based on their

probability of violating the new

NAAQS: (1) Areas with a strong

likelihood of violating the PM-10

NAAQS and requiring substantial SIP

adjustment were placed in Group I, (2)

areas where attainment of the PM-1

NAAQS was possible and existing SIP's

needed less adjustment were placed in

Group II, (3) areas with a strong

likelihood of attaining the PM-10

NAAQS and therefore needing

adjustment only to their preconstruction

review program and monitoring network

were placed in Group III (52 FR 24672,

24679-24682).

B. Prior Listing of and Modification to

PM-la Groups I, II, and III Areas

In accordance with the standards,

policies, and regulations published on

July 1, 1987 for revising and

implementing the new particulate matter

standards, EPA identified and listed the

Group I and Group II areas in each State

in a notice published on August 7, 1987

(52 FR 29383). That notice also indicated

that any area of the country not listed as

Group I or II was placed in Group III (52

FR 29383).

The EPA subsequently modified the

listing for three areas and announced

these revisions in a notice published on

March 28, 1989 (54 FR 12620).

Specifically, the 1989 notice indicated

that Porter County, Indiana, was

changed from Group I to Group II; Mono

Basin, California, was changed from

Group III to Group II; and Sandpoint,

Idaho, was changed from Group I to

Group II.

On October 31, 1990, EPA published

technical corrections clarifying the

boundaries of concern for some of the

areas previously identified as Groups I

and II areas (55 FR 45799). When EPA

listed the initial groupings for areas in

the August 1987 notice, the Groups I and

II areas of concern were generally

described as cities, towns, counties, or planning areas. The EPA indicated at

that time that these descriptions were

only the initial definitions of the areas to

be investigated in the SIP development

process and would be better defined

later. The clarifications to the Groups I

and 1I areas announced in October 1990

specifically defined and delineated the

boundaries of the Groups I and Group II areas in question based on information

obtained in the SIP development process

and EPA guidelines and procedures for

determining particulate matter

boundaries. With respect to Group II

areas, the October 1990 notice also set

forth those areas containing a site for

which air quality monitoring data

showed a violation of the NAAQS prior

to January 1, 1989.1

II. Today's Action

In the 1990 Amendments to the Clean

Air Act, Congress used the PM-10

grouping scheme as the starting point for

designating areas on nonattainment and

unclassifiable for PM-10 by operation of

law upon enactment of the

Amendments. Group I areas identified in

52 FR 29383 (August 7, 1987) and as

subsequently clarified in 55 FR 45799

(October 31, 1990) were designated

nonattainment for PM-10 by operation

of law 2 [see section 107(d)(4)(B)(i) of

the amended Act]. Any other area (i.e.,

Group II or III areas) containing a site

for which air quality monitoring data

showed a violation of the NAAQS for

PM-la prior to January 1, 1989 was also

designated nonattainment for PM-10 by

operation of law upon enactment (see

107(d)(4)(B)(ii) of the amendment Act].

All other areas were designated

unclassifiable for PM-10 by operation of

law [see 107(d)(4)(B)(iii) of the amended

Act]. By this notice, EPA is announcing,

as required by section 107(d)(2) of the

amended Act, all of those areas that

were designated nonattainment for PM10 by operation of law on November 15,

1990.

Section 188(a) of the amended Act

provides that those areas designated

nonattainment for PM-10 upon

enactment of the 1990 Clean Air Act

Amendments were, by operation of law,

classified as moderate PM-la

nonattainment areas at the time of their

designation as nonattainment. By this

notice, EPA is also announcing, as

required by section 188(a) of the

amended Act, that all of the areas

designated as nonattainment for PM-10

by operation of law upon enactment of'

the Amendments were classified as

moderate nonattainment areas at that

time.

For administrative efficiency reasons,

EPA will defer the ministerial act of

formally codifying these PM-10

designations and classifications in 40

CFR part 81 until EPA codifies

designations and classifications for

other pollutants sometime within the

next few months. This notice is provided

now in order to make the

announcements required by sections

107(d)(2) and 188(a) of the revised Act

and to ensure that SIP development for

I Footnote 4 of the October 31, 1990 notice

references Group 11 areas with violations of the PM10 NAAQS.

2 The notice published on October 31, 1990 155 FR

45799 reflects the revisions announced in the notice

published on March 28, 1989 (54 FR 12620).

11102

HeinOnline -- 56 Fed. Reg. 11102 1991
Federal Register / Vol. 56, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 1991 / Rules and Regulations

the new PM-10 nonattainment areas

proceeds in a timely fashion.

Neither of these actions is subject to

the APA requirements for notice-andcomment rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553-557)

or section 307(d) of the amended Clean

Air Act.3 Regarding designations.

section 107(d)(2) of the amended Act

requires the Administrator to publish a

notice announcing designations

occurring pursuant to section 107(d)(4),

but explicitly provides that such

announcement is not subject to APA

notice-and-comment rulemaking

procedures. Thus, Congress has

expressly exempted the announcement

of those areas designated nonattainment

for PM-10 by operation of law under

section 107(d)(4)(B from the notice-andcomment procedural requirements of the

APA.

Regarding classifications, section

188(a) of the amended Act requires the

Administrator to publish a notice

announcing the classifications of these

areas. Section 188(a) explicitly states

that the provisions of section

172(a)(1)(B) pertaining to lack of notice

and comment and judicial review shall

apply when the Administrator

announces these classifications. Section

172(a)(1)(B), in turn, expressly exempts

the classification announcement from

the notice-and-comment procedures set

forth in 5 U.S.C. 553-557 of the APA.

Nevertheless, for the purpose of

providing an opportunity for public

participation and avoiding error, EPA

will entertain any comments on these

actions that are received by April 15,

1991. The EPA's announcement of these

PM-10 INITIAL NONATTAINMENT AREAS "

actions [for purposes of sections

107(d)(2) and 188(a)] will become

effective on May 14, 1991. This will

provide enough time for EPA to make

any adjustments to the announcement

that are appropriate in light of the

comments.

Ill. Initial PM-10 Nonattainment Areas

The following list identifies all of

those areas designated as

nonattainment for PM-10 on November

15, 1990, upon enactment of the Clean

Air Act Amendments of 1990. The EPA

also announces, pursuant to section

188(a) of the amended Act, that all of

these areas were classified as moderate

by operation of law upon enactment of

the Amendments.

State and counties

AlaskaAnchorage .........................................

Juneau ...............................................

Arizona:

Cochise ..............................................

Santa Cruz ........................................

Pim a ...................................................

Maricopa and Pins] .....................

Yum a ..................................................

Pinal and Gila ...................................

California:

Inyo ...................................................

San Bernardino, Inyo, and Kern.....

M ono .................................................

Fresno, Kern, Kings, Tulare, San

Joaquin, Stanislaus, Madera.

Riverside. Los Angeles, Orange,

and San Bernardino.

Riverside ............................ ..

Im perial .............................. ..

Colorado:

Archuleta ...........................................

8 Regarding section 307(d) requirements, today's

actions are not among the actions listed in section

Area of Concern

Community of Eagle River.

City of Juneau: Mendenhall Valley area.

Paul Spur/Douglas planning area: Township 23 south, Range 25 east (T23S, R25E); T23S, R26E; T24S, R25E; T24S, R26E;

T23S, R27E; T24S, R27E; T23S, R28E; T24S, R28E.

Nogales planning area: The portions of the following Townships which are within the State of Arizona and lie east of 111I

longitude:

T23S, R13E; T23S, R14E;

T24S, Rt3E; T24S, R14E;

Rillito planning area: Townships:

T1IS, R9E; Ti1S, R10E; TilS, R1lE; T1lS, R12E;

T12S, 88E; T12S, R9E; T12S, R1OE; T12S, R11E; T12S; R12E;

Ajo planning area: Township T12S, R6W, and the following sections of Township T12S, R5W:

a. Sections 6-8

b. Sections 17-20, and

c. Sections 29-32

Phoenix planning area: The rectangle determined by, and including,

T6N, R3W; T6N, R7E;

T2S, R3W; T2S, R7E;

TIN; RBE

Yuma planning area: Townships: T7S-R21W, 822W; T8S-R21W, R22W, R23W, R24W; T9S-R21W, R22W, R23W, R24W,

R25W; T10S-R21W, R22W, R23W, R24W, 825W.

Hayden/Miamri planning area: Townships:

T4S, Rt6E

T5S, R16E

T6S, Rl6E

plus the portion of Township T3S. R16E that does not lie on the San Carlos Indian Reservation, and the rectangle

formed by, and including, Townships:

TIN, R13E; TIN, RI5E

T6S, R13E; T6S, R15E

Owens Valley planning area: Hydrologic Unit #18090103.

Searles Valley planning area: Hydrologic Unit #1809005.

Mammoth Lake planning area: Includes the following sections:

a. Sections 1-12, 17, and 18 of Township T4S, R28E;

b. Sections 25-36 of Township T3S, R28E;

c. Sections 25-36 of Township T3S, R27E;

d. Sections 1-18 of Township T4S, 827E;

and

a. Sections 25 and 36 of Township T3S, R26E

San Joaquin Valley planning area.

South Coast Air Basin.

Coachella Valley planning area.

Imperial Valley planning area.

Pagosa Springs.

307(d)(1) of the amended Act as being subject to the

procedural requirements of section 307(d). nor has

11103

the Administrator designated these actions as 307{d][I]fU] of the amended Act.

HeinOnline -- 56 Fed. Reg. 11103 1991
Federal Register / Vol. 56, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 1991 / Rules and Regulations

PM-10 INITIAL NONATTAINMENT AREAS 1.2-Continued

State and counties IArea of Concern

Adams, Denver, Arapahoe, Jefferson, Douglas, and Boulder.

San M iguel .......................................

Prow ers .............................................

Pitkin .................................................

Frem ont ............................................

Connecticut:

New Haven ......................................

Idaho:

Ada ....................................................

Shoshone .........................................

Bannock and Power ........................

Bonner ..............................................

Illinois:

Cook ..................................................

LaSalle .............................................

M adison ............................................

Indiana:

Lake ..................................................

Verm illion ..........................................

Maine:

Aroostook .........................................

Michigan:

W ayne ...............................................

Minnesota:

Ramsey ...........................

O lm sted .............................................

Missouri:

Audrain ..............................................

Montana:

Flathead .............................................

Lincoln ...............................................

Lake ...................................................

M issoula ............................................

Rosebud ............................................

Silver Bow .........................................

Nevada:

W ashoe ..............................................

Clark ...................................................

New Mexico:

Dona Ana ..........................................

Ohio:

Cuyahoga ..........................................

Jefferson ............................................

Oregon:

Jackson .............................................

Josephine ..........................................

Lane ..................................................

Klam ath .............................................

Union ..................................................

Denver Metropolitan area: All of Denver,. Jefferson, and Douglas Counties, Boulder County (excluding the Rocky Mountain

National Park) and the Colorado automobile inspection and readjustment program portions of Adams and Arapahoe

Counties.

Telluride.

Lamar

Aspen.

Canon City.

City of New Haven.

Boise: Northern Boundary-Beginning at a point in the center of the channel of the Boise River, where the line between

sections 15 and 16 in township 3 north (T3N), range 4 east (R4E), crosses said Boise River; thence, west down the center

of the channel of the Boise River to a point opposite the mouth of More's Creek; thence, in a straight line north 44 degrees

and 38 minutes west until the said line intersects the north line of T5N (12 Ter. Ses. 67); thence, west to the northwest

corner T5N, RlW; Western Boundary-Thence, south to the northwest corner of T3N, RIW; thence, east to the northwest

corner of section 4 of T3N, RIW; thence, south to the southeast corner of section 32 of T2N, RIW; thence, west to the

northwest corner of T1N, RiW; thence, south to the southwest corner of section 32 of T2N, RIW; thence, west to the

northwest corner of TIN, RIW; thence, south to the southwest corner of T1N, RIW; Southern Boundary-Thence, east to

the southwest comer of section 33 of T1 N, R4E; Eastern Boundary-Thence, north along the north and south center line of

Townships T1N, R4E, T2N, R4E, and T3N. R4E; Boise Meridian to the beginning point in the center of the channel of the

Boise River.

City of Pinehurst.

City of Pocatello.

County.

a. Lyons Township

b. The area bounded on the north by 79th Street, on the west by Route 57, on the south by Sibley Boulevard and on the east

by the Illinois/Indiana State line.

Oglesby including the following Townships, ranges, and sections: T32N, RiE, Si; T32N, R2E, S6; T33N, RlE, S24; T33N,

R1E, S25; T33N, R2E, S31; and T33N, R1E, S36.

Granite City Township and Nameoki Township.

Cities of East Chicago, Hammond, Whiting, and Gary.

Clinton Township.

City of Presque Isle.

The area bounded by Michigan Avenue from its intersection with 1-75 west to 1-94, 1-94 southwest to Greenfield Road,

Greenfield Road south to Schaefer Road, Schaefer Road south and east to Jefferson Avenue, Jefferson Avenue south

(Biddle Avenue through the city of Wyandotte) to Sibley Avenue, Sibley Avenue west to Fort Street, Fort Street south to

King Road, King Road east to Jefferson Avenue, Jefferson Avenue south to Helen Road, Helen Road east extended to

Trenton Channel, Trenton Channel north to the Detroit River, the Detroit River north to the Ambassador Bridge,

Ambassador Bridge to 1-75, 1-75 to Michigan Avenue.

The area bounded by the Mississippi River from Lafayette to Route 494, Route 494 east to Route 61, Route 61 north to 1-94

1-94 west to Lafayette, and Lafayette south to the Mississippi River.

City of Rochester.

County.

The area bounded by lines from Universal Transmercator (UTM) coordinate 700000mE, 5347000mN, east to 704000mE,

5347000mN, south to 70400OmE, 5341000mN, west to 703000mE, 5341000mN, south to 703000mE, 5340000mN, west to

702000mE, 5340000mN, south to 702000mE, 5339000mN, east to 703000mE, 5339000mN, south to 703000mE,

5338000mN, east to 704000mE, 5338000mN, south to 704000mE, 5336000mN, west to 702000mE, 5336000mN, south to

702000mE, 5335000mN, west to 70000mE, 5335000mN, north to 700000mE, 5340000mN, west to 695000mE,

5340000mN, north to 695000mE, 5345000mN, east to 700000mE, 5345000mN, north to 70000mE, 5347000mN.

Columbia Falls: Township T30N, R20W, Sections 7, 8, 9, 16, and 17.

Libby.

Ronan, Poison.

Township T13N, R19W, sections 2, 8, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, East 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24. 27, 28, 29, East 1/2 30, East 1/2 31.

32, 33, 34, and T12N, R19W, section 4, 5, 6, 7.

Lame Deer.

Butte.

Reno planning area: Hydrographic area 87.

Las Vegas planning area: Hydrographic Area 212.

The area bounded by Anthony Quadrangle, Anthony, New Mexico-Texas, SE/4 La Mesa 15' Quadrangle, N3200-W10630i

7.5, Township 26S, Range 3E, Sections 35 and 36 as limited by the New Mexico-Texas State line on the south.

County.

The portion of the City of Steubenville south of Market Street, plus the area bounded on the north by the southern boundary

of the City of Steubenville, on the west by Ohio Route #7, on the south by the southern border of Steubenville Township,

and on the east by the Ohio/West Virginia border.

Medford-Ashland air quality maintenance area (including White City).

Grants Pass: The area within the urban growth boundary.

Eugene/Springfield: The area within the urban growth boundary.

Klamath Falls: The area within the urban growth boundary.

LaGrande: The area within the urban growth boundary.

11104

HeinOnline -- 56 Fed. Reg. 11104 1991
Federal Register / Vol. 56, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 1991 /. Rules and Regulations

PM-10 INITIAL NONATTAINMENT AREAS 1"

2-Continued

State and counties Area of Concern

Pennsylvania:

Allegheny ........................................... The area including Liberty, Lincoln, Port Vue. and Glassport Boroughs and the City of Clairton.

Puerto Rico:

Guaynabo .......................................... Municipality of Guaynabo.

Texas:Lubbock ............................................. That portion of the City of Lubbock enclosed by Loop 289 highway.

El Paso .............................................. City of El Paso.

Utah:

Salt Lake .......................................... County.

Utah ............... County.

Washington: King .................................................... The portion of the City of Seattle bounded on the east by 1-5/East Duwamish Greenbelt, on the south by 104th Street, on te

west by the West Duwamish Greenbelt north to Fairmont Avenue, S.W., north on Fairmont to Elliott Bay, and Dearborn

Street from Elliott Bay to 1-5;

The City of Kent and a portion of the Green River valley bounded on east and west by the 100-foot contour, on the north by South 212th Street, and on the south by Highway 516.

Pierce ................................................. Tacoma metropolitan area bounded on the north by Marine View Drive from Commencement Bay east to the 100-foot

contour, southeast along the 100-foot contour to 64th Avenue East, south along 64th Avenue East extended to 1-5, 1-5

west to the 100-foot contour near Pacific Avenue, and north along the 100-foot contour to Commencement Bay. Spokane ............................................ The area bounded on the south by a line from Universal Transmercator (UTM) coordinate 489000mE, 5271000mN, west to

458000mE, 5271000mN, thence north along a line to coordinate 458000mE, 5288000mN, thence east to 463000mE, 5288000mN, thence north to 463000mE, 5292000mN, thence east to 481000mE, 5292000mN, thence south to 481000mE,

5288000mN, thence east to 489000mE, 5288000, thence south to the beginning coordinate 489000mE, 5271000mN.

Yakima ............................................ The area bounded on the south by a line from Universal Transmercator (UTM) coordinate 694000mW. 5157000mN, west to

681000mW, 5157000mN, thence north along a line to coordinate 681000mW, 5172000mN, thence south to the beginning

coordinate 694000mW, 5157000mN.

Thurston .......................................... Cities of Olympia, Tumwater, and Lacey.

W alla W alla ....................................... W allula.

West Virginia:

Brooke ............................................... Follansbee area bounded on the north by the Market Street Bridge, on the east by West Virginia Route #2, on the south b)

the extension of the southern boundary of Steubenville Township in Jefferson County. Ohio, and on the west by the Ohio/

West Virginia border.

Wyoming:

Sheridan ........................................... City of Sheridan.

When cities or towns are shown, the area of concern is defined by the municipal boundary limits as of the date of this notice. = When a planning area is shown, the area of concern includes the entire planning area unless the area is further defined (e.g.. by township, range, and/oi

section).

IV. Significance of Today's Action

By November 15, 1991, States must

adopt and submit to EPA a SIP for all

those areas that were classified as

moderate PM-10 nonattainment areas

by operation of law upon enactment of

the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments

[see Subpart 4 of Part D of Title I of the

Clean Air Act as amended (section

189)]. All of the areas listed above must

submit a SIP meeting the general

requirements for nonattainment areas

identified in section 172 of the amended

Act and the requirements specific to

PM-10 in Subpart 4 of Part D. In

particular, section 189(a) of the amended

Act requires that all of the initial

moderate PM-10 nonattainment areas

submit a SIP by November 15, 1991

which includes the following:

1. Either a demonstration (including

air quality modeling) that the plan will

provide for attainment by December 31,

1994 or a demonstration that attainment

by that date is impracticable.

2. Provisions to assure that reasonably

available control measures (including

reasonably available control

technology) for the control of PM-10 are

implemented by December 10, 1993.

In addition, a new source permit

program meeting the requirements of

Part D of the Act is required for the

construction and operation of new and

modified major stationary sources of

PM-10 (including, in some cases, PM-10

precursors). A SIP revision meeting this

requirement is due by June 30, 1992 for

all of the initial moderate PM-10

nonattainment areas. The EPA will

provide additional guidance on SIP

requirements for these areas in the near

future.

Also note that EPA must take final

action by the end of 1991 with respect to

which of these initial PM-10

nonattainment areas should be

reclassified from moderate to serious

because they cannot practicably attain

the PM-1 air quality standards by

December 31, 1994 [see section 188(b)(1)

of the amended Act]. If reclassified as

serious, these areas will be subject to

additional control requirements and a

new attainment date. Since EPA must

propose these reclassifications by June

30, 1991, EPA will work with the States

before that date in order to develop a

proposed list of moderate areas to be

reclassified as serious.

V. Authority

Sections 107(d)(4). 110, 188(a), and 301

of the amended Clean Air Act provide

authority for today's action.

Dated: March 7, 1991.

Michael Shapiro,

Acting Assistant Administrotor for Air and

Radiation.

[FR Doc. 91-5987 Filed 3-14-91; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M

GENERAL SERVICES

ADMINISTRATION

41 CFR Part 301-1 and Ch. 304

[FTR interim Rule 3]

RIN 3090-AE19

Federal Travel Regulation; Acceptance

of Payment From a Non-Federal

Source for Travel Expenses

AGENCY: Federal Supply Service, GSA.

ACTION: Interim rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error

in a document amending the Federal

Travel Regulation which was published

March 8, 1991 (56 FR 9878). In the

11105

HeinOnline -- 56 Fed. Reg. 11105 1991