alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1030 PLATE 28

EXPLANATION

=a
Arkosie pebble conglomerate Zz a

Arkosic sandstone

cS

Shale and siltstone,
undifferentiated

Limestone

Sangre de Cristo formation (PPsc)

a
a a
it A CAESARIO

PENNSYLVANIAN AND PERMIAN(?)

Nf / fi \ COSTILLO

CARBONIFEROUS

PENNSYLVANIAN

Magdalena group (Pm)

Fault, approximately located,
showing relative movement

Outerop of minerals
or radioactive materials

4
Vertical shaft

€7-97,98,99
82-10
Prospect trench
Location number-sample numbers,

Sample numbers in italic from
Zeller and Baltz, 1954

@ £1-46,47

Old open pit
Location number-sample numbers

TRUE NORTH

fi
INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, D. ©.

MR S340

Geology by D.C. taub and G. W. Fuller, 1953,

GEOLOGIC MAP OF AREA E SHOWING COPPER AND URANIUM DEPOSITS, COYOTE DISTRICT, MORA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
200 ° 400 Feet

1 1
#### Edgar BAKER et ux *v.*Charles TROTTER et al

5-6044

486 S.W. 2d 7

Opinion delivered October 16, 1972

[Rehearing denied November 20, 1972.]

*248
      *Keith Rutledge,*for appellants.

*Havkey*¿r *Walmsley,*for appellees.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellants, Edgar Baker and his wife, brought this suit to quiet their title to part of an island in Independence County. In their pleadings the Bakers asserted that they had record title to the land and that they and their predecessors in title had been in actual possession of the property for more than 25 years. The principal defendant, John L. Davis, denied the Bakers’ allegations of title and asserted title in himself, by recorded conveyances and by adverse possession. After an extended trial, at which much testimony and many exhibits were introduced, the chancellor entered a decree finding Davis to be the owner of the land, both by record title and by adverse possession. The appellants contend that the chancellor was wrong in both respects.

Despite our reluctance to affirm any decree because of an appellant’s failure to comply with Rule 9, we have no alternative in this case. In a súit of this kind the Bakers, as plaintiffs, must recover upon the strength of their own title, not upon the weakness of their adversary’s. *Sanders*v. *Boone,*154 Ark. 237, 242 S.W. 66, 32 A.L.R. 461 (1922). As appellants the Bakers also have the burden of showing that the chancellor was in error in finding Davis to be the record owner of the land.

In their brief the Bakers assert that they have an unbroken chain of title from a Government patent in 1830 down to their purchase of the land in 1968. Yet none of the conveyances have been abstracted. The brief merely refers us to the Bakers’ exhibits 2 to 13 inclusive, at pages 175 to 204 of the record. Rule 9 specifically requires that material parts of documents be abstracted and that essential maps, plats, photographs, and other exhibits be reproduced and attached to the appellant’s abstract. None of the exhibits, such as surveys and photographs of the island in question, have been reproduced. It is wholly impossible for us to determine from the abstracts and briefs whether the chancellor was right or wrong in finding Davis to be the record owner of the land. We have often *249pointed out the impossibility of expecting all seven judges to examine the single copy of the record that is filed here. It follows that, under repeated decisions of this court, the decree must be affirmed. *Rose City Property Owners’ Assn.*v. *Matthews Co.,*250 Ark. 334, 465 S.W. 2d 118 (1971); *Wells*v. *Paragon Printing Co.,*249 Ark. 950, 462 S.W. 2d 471 (1971); *Tudor*v. *Tudor,*247 Ark. 822, 448 S.W. 2d 17 (1969); *Vire*v. *Vire,*236 Ark. 740, 368 S.W. 2d 265 (1963).

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.14





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) being named and identified as a "qualified person" and the use of my name in connection with the following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the technical report entitled "43-101 Technical Report on a Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Wassa open pit and underground project in Ghana" effective date October 30, 2014 and filed on October 22, 2014, (B) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2014, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, and Registration Statement No. 333-196906 on Form F-10, as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.








/s/ John Willis


John Willis





March 31, 2015
```

[House Document 114-90]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

114th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - House Document 114-90
 
  OMB FINAL SEQUESTRATION REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS FOR  
                         FISCAL YEAR 2016

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

             THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

                              transmitting

THE OFFICE'S CURRENT ESTIMATES OF THE DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS FOR 
EACH CATEGORY IN THE BALANCED BUDGET AND EMERGENCY DEFICIT CONTROL ACT, 
PURSUANT TO 2 U.S.C. 904(f)(1); PUBLIC LAW 99-177, SEC. 254 (AS AMENDED 
            BY PUBLIC LAW 112-25, SEC. 103); (125 STAT. 246)

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

 January 7, 2016.--Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
```
#### BENTLEY’S ADMINISTRATOR *v.*HOLLENBACK.

Mistake in note — set-off—payment for another after death — account books.

When a note by mistake is given for too large a sum, and the surplus afterwards agreed to be endorsed but neglected, a credit will be allowed at the trial, either under a set-off or otherwise.

Where one obliged for another as surety, pays after the death of his principal, he may set off such payments when sued on a debt he owed the estate of Ills principal.

Account books, under certain restrictions, may be received in evidence in favor of an administrator.

Debt upon a note. It was agreed that the note was given for the balance found upon a settlement, and it was ascertained shortly after the settlement, that, by mistake, the note was for $30 too much, which amount it was then agreed should be endorsed on the note; but the endorsement was neglected. The defendant had *169gone security for the plaintiff’s intestate, and had paid for him about twenty dollars since his death, and that he had a book account, which was exhibited. ■ These demands were claimed as a set off.

*Caldwell*and Irvin, for the plaintiff

*jDoane,*for the defendant.

By the Court.

The note was for thirty dollars too much, by mistake, and it was agreed it should be reduced to the true amount. We see no legal objection to allowing this to reduce the recovery as a set-off or .otherwise; nor do we see any to the money paid since the death upon the security entered into before. It is said the estate is insolvent, and this would in effect prefer this creditor. We think the law of set-off embraces the case, and that is sufficient. The other point is more difficult. In many cases justice requires that account books should be received in evidence, not as conclusive evidence of a claim, but as conducing to prove it. The books may be strengthened or weakened by other evidence, such as proving that the party kept fair books, had no clerk, &c. In this mase we are disposed to look at the book. 12 *John. R.*461; *Tap-yards R.*67.

Judgment allowing the set-off.
§ 135.323 Training program: General. ( a ) Each certificate holder required to have a training program under § 135.341 shall: ( 1 ) Establish and implement a training program that satisfies the requirements of this subpart and that ensures that each crewmember, aircraft dispatcher, flight instructor, and check pilot is adequately trained to perform his or her assigned duties. Prior to implementation, the certificate holder must obtain initial and final FAA approval of the training program.
( 2 ) Provide adequate ground and flight training facilities and properly qualified ground instructors for the training required by this subpart.
( 3 ) Provide and keep current for each aircraft type used and, if applicable, the particular variations within the aircraft type, appropriate training material, examinations, forms, instructions, and procedures for use in conducting the training and checks required by this subpart.
( 4 ) Provide enough flight instructors, check pilots, and FSTD instructors to conduct required flight training and flight checks and FSTD training courses allowed under this subpart.
( b ) Whenever a crewmember who is required to take recurrent training under this subpart completes the training in the calendar month before, or the calendar month after, the month in which that training is required, the crewmember is considered to have completed it in the calendar month in which it was required.
( c ) Each instructor, supervisor, or check pilot who is responsible for a particular ground training subject, segment of flight training, course of training, flight check, or competence check under this part shall certify as to the proficiency and knowledge of the crewmember, flight instructor, or check pilot concerned upon completion of that training or check. That certification shall be made a part of the crewmember's record. When the certification required by this paragraph is made by an entry in a computerized recordkeeping system, the certifying instructor, supervisor, or check pilot, must be identified with that entry. However, the signature of the certifying instructor, supervisor, or check pilot is not required for computerized entries.
( d ) Training subjects that apply to more than one aircraft or crewmember position and that have been satisfactorily completed during previous training while employed by the certificate holder for another aircraft or another crewmember position, need not be repeated during subsequent training other than recurrent training.
( e ) Aircraft simulators and other training devices may be used in the certificate holder's training program if approved by the Administrator.
[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-101, 70 FR 58829, Oct. 7, 2005; Docket No. FAA-2019-0360; Amdt. No. 135-145, 89 FR 51430, June 18, 2024]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3385

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent sex offenders subject 

to involuntary civil commitments from receiving Federal student financial 

aid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2003

Mr. KELLER (for himself, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. WILSON

of South Carolina, and Mr. CRENSHAW) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent 

sex offenders subject to involuntary civil commitments 

from receiving Federal student financial aid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Financial Aid for 

5 Sex Offenders Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AID. 

7 (a) PELL GRANTS.—Section 401(b)(8) of the Higher 

8 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a(b)(8)) is amend9 ed by inserting before the period the following: ‘‘or who 
2

•HR 3385 IH 

1 is subject to an involuntary civil commitment upon com2 pletion of a period of incarceration for a sexual offense 

3 (as determined under regulations of the Secretary)’’. 

4 (b) LOANS.—Section 484(b)(5) of such Act (20 

5 U.S.C. 1091(b)(5)) is amended by inserting before the pe6 riod the following: ‘‘and no student who is subject to an 

7 involuntary civil commitment upon completion of a period 

8 of incarceration for a sexual offense (as determined under 

9 regulations of the Secretary) is eligible to receive a loan 

10 under this title’’.

Æ
#### ATKINSON AND RAWLINS *v.*JORDAN, ELLIS & CO.

Chancery subjecting effects in aid of execution at law — diligence—priority of distribution— practice.

The creditor who first files his bill to set aside a fraudulent conveyance, and to subject the assigned effects to his judgment, being the most diligent creditor, secures to himself priority in distribution over other creditors.

Where a plaintiff has acquired, by execution at law, a legal preference to the assistance of Court of Chancery, that preference is always preserved, in the distribution in chancery.

*247The course of practice in this state, is, to secure to the most vigilant creditor the advantage his diligence obtains.

Chancery. The case appears in the opinion of the Court.

*Storer*and *Fox,*for the complainants.

*Starr,*contra.

Wright, J.

The only question in this case, is, whether a creditor, who first files his bill against the assignees of an insolvent debtor obtains a priority in the distribution of the insolvent effects, in case the assignment is declared *void.*

The object of the complainant is to charge certain goods of their debtor, with the payment of a judgment they have. The reason for coming into this court, is, that the grounds are so covered up by the fraudulent act of the defendants, who are their debtors, that they are protected from levy and sale on execution at law. But for the acts of the defendants, the complainants could have levied their debt at law, and secured their priority. They have been compelled to come into this court to obtain execution of their judgment. Why deprive them of the reward of their diligence? After the complainants have removed the difficulty, other creditors come and ask leave to avail themselves of their labor. The course of practice in this state has hitherto been to secure to the vigilant creditor the advantage his diligence obtains. Chancellor Kent, in 4 *John. Ch.*690, holds, that where a plaintiff has acquired, by execution at law, a legal preference to the assistance of chancery, that preference ought not, in justice, to be taken away. Though it be the favorite policy of this Court to distribute assets equally among creditors, *pari passu,*yet, whenever a judicial preference has been established by the superior legal diligence of any creditor, that preference is always preserved in the distribution of assets in this Court. Suppose the complainants had levied upon these goods, and then filed their bill to remove the fraudulent assignment, and this Court had merely decreed it to be void, can there be a doubt that they would have retained their priority ? The case before us does not differ in principle. This Court has possession of the case, to remove the obstacle to the sale of the goods, and may rightfully take upon itself the sale and distribution. The complainants are the most diligent creditors, and have priority in distribution. They must be paid. The residue, if any, can be disposed of to the other creditors.
EXHIBIT-99.2

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.17 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                     AGREEMENT DATED AS OF April 1, 1998


                          BA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                       MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 1998-1


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. as
successor in interest to Bank of America, FSB, the Master Servicer in connection
with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1998-1, do hereby certify that
(i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of its performance under the pooling and servicing agreements,
including this Agreement, has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled in all
material aspects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                    By:
                                         /s/ Robert S. O'Neill
                                         Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                         Title: Senior Vice President
# EPA Reg. No. 87289-1

1

### 2

### 3

### 4

### 5

### 6

### 7

### 8*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

### 9

### 10*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

### 11

### 12

### 13*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*______________________________________________________________ Page is not included in this copy. Pages 14 through 15 are not included in this copy.

_________________________________________________________________ The material not included contains the following type of information: _____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

__ __ Identity of product impurities.

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process.

__ __ Description of quality control procedures.

__ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients. _____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. _____ A draft product label. __X __ The product confidential statement of formula. _____ Information about a pending registration action.

__ __ FIFRA registration data.

__ __ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _ . _____ The document is not responsive to the request.

__ __ Internal deliberative information.

__ __ Privileged attorney-client communication.

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the Agency.

### 16

### 17

### 18

### 19

### 20

### 21

### 22

### 23

### 24

### 25

### 26

### 27

### 28

### 29

### 30

### 31

### 32

### 33

### 34

### 35

### 36

### 37

### 38

### 39

### 40

### 41

### 42

### 43

### 44

### 45

### 46______________________________________________________________ Page 47 is not included in this copy. Pages through are not included in this copy.

_________________________________________________________________ The material not included contains the following type of information: _____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

__ __ Identity of product impurities.

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process.

__ __ Description of quality control procedures.

__ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients. _____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. _____ A draft product label. __X __ The product confidential statement of formula. _____ Information about a pending registration action.

__ __ FIFRA registration data.

__ __ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _ . _____ The document is not responsive to the request.

__ __ Internal deliberative information.

__ __ Privileged attorney-client communication.

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the Agency.
# Official Journal C 286A/31 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 286A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6331 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 286A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6331 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| 2020/C 286 A/01 | Vacancy notice No COR/AD 14/20 BIS/20 — Director (M/F) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Committee of the Regions

2020/C 286 A/01

Vacancy notice No COR/AD 14/20 BIS/20 — Director (M/F)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Editorial Note on Part 1251
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1251 appear at 81 FR 3709, Jan. 22, 2016.

§ 1251.540 Employment. ( a ) *General.* No qualified individual shall, on the basis of disability, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity to which this part applies.
( b ) *Employment discrimination standards.* The standards used to determine whether paragraph (a) of this section has been violated shall be the standards applied under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12,111 *et seq.*) and, as such sections relate to employment, the provisions of sections 501 through 504 and 510 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12201-12204 and 12210), as amended by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-325), as such standards are implemented in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's regulation at 29 CFR part 1630, as amended.
[81 FR 3713, Jan. 22, 2016]
EXHIBIT 21.1



Significant Subsidiaries of the Registrant



The following are significant subsidiaries of Knight Trading Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and the states in which
they are organized. Indentation indicates the principal parent of each subsidiary. Except as otherwise specified, in each case Knight Trading Group, Inc. owns, directly or indirectly, at least 99% of the voting securities of each subsidiary. The
names of particular subsidiaries have been omitted because, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute, as of December 31, 2004, a significant subsidiary as that term is defined in Rule 1-02(w) of
Regulation S-X under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



|                                   |  |                
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|Name                               |  | State of Entity
|Knight Trading Group, Inc.         |  | Delaware       
|Knight/Trimark, Inc.               |  | Delaware       
|Knight Securities General, Inc.    |  | Delaware       
|Knight Securities Operations, Inc. |  | Delaware       
|Knight Equity Markets, L.P.        |  | Delaware       
|Knight Capital Markets LLC         |  | Delaware       
|KFP Holdings I LLC                 |  | Delaware       
|Deephaven Capital Management LLC   |  | Delaware