alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 117.1 Applicability. ( a ) This part prescribes flight and duty limitations and rest requirements for all flightcrew members and certificate holders conducting passenger operations under part 121 of this chapter.
( b ) This part applies to all operations directed by part 121 certificate holders under part 91, other than subpart K, of this chapter if any segment is conducted as a domestic passenger, flag passenger, or supplemental passenger operation.
( c ) This part applies to all flightcrew members when participating in an operation under part 91, other than subpart K of this chapter, on behalf of the part 121 certificate holder if any flight segment is conducted as a domestic passenger, flag passenger, or supplemental passenger operation
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this section, a certificate holder may conduct under part 117 its part 121 operations pursuant to 121.470, 121.480, or 121.500.
# Memorandum

To: Four Corners Powpj Plant Permit File, NN 14-01 and T-002-NN From: Lisa BeckhamI..}4~-” Date: 7/10/2014 Re: SAM Emissions Limits in Permits Issued bythe Wyoming Departmentfor Environmental Quality
On July 10, 2014, I spoke with Cole Anderson, New Source Review Program Manageratthe AirQuality Division forthe Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality regarding two coal-fired power plants in Wyoming. Naughton Plant Mr. Anderson confirmed that the Naughton Plant, in orderto meet BART, received a PSD permitto add SCR and a baghouse for Unit 3 atthe plant, which included a limit on H2S04 emissions. However, the source laterdecided that as part of itsfuture business model itwould be converting to natural gas. Units 1 and 2 were not required to add 5CR.
Dry Fork

— Basin Electric PowerCooperative Mr. Anderson confirmed that this facility began operating, approximately, in 2012. It has undergone initial performance testing and has not had anyviolations ofits permitted emission limits, including its H2S04 emissions limit.
#### § 791.2 Number of votes required for board action.

The agreement of at least two of the three Board members is required for any action by the Board.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 CAROLYN WRIGHT

JUSTICES

 DAVID L. BRIDGES

 MOLLY FRANCIS

 DOUGLAS S. LANG

 ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

 ROBERT M. FILLMORE

 LANA MYERS

 DAVID EVANS

 DAVID LEWIS

 ADA BROWN

 CRAIG STODDART

 BILL WHITEHILL

 DAVID J. SCHENCK

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 200

DALLAS, TEXAS 75202

(214) 712-3400

LISA MATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712-3450

lisa.matz@5th.txcourts.gov

GAYLE HUMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR

(214) 712-3434

gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov

FACSIMILE

(214) 745-1083

INTERNET

HTTP://5TH.TXCOURTS.GOV

March 11, 2015

Honorable Gracie Lewis

Presiding Judge

Criminal District Court No. 3

Frank Crowley Courts Building

133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-40

Dallas, TX 75207

Re: STATUS INQUIRY

05-15-000006/00007/00008/00009-CR, Gary Wayne Barnes, Sr. v. The State of Texas

Dear Judge Lewis:

On January 28, 2015, this Court ordered the trial court to make findings regarding the above 

cases. A copy of the order is enclosed. To date, we have not received the findings. Therefore, please 

notify us of the status of the findings within TEN DAYS of the date of this letter. We appreciate 

your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ Lisa Matz, Clerk

cc: Gary Wayne Barnes, Sr.

Lori Ordiway

ltr:mrh
<PAGE>




                                 EXHIBIT (10)(a)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



<PAGE>

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports (1)
dated February 14, 2003 with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements
and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company of New York and (2) dated
January 31, 2003 with respect to the subaccounts of Separate Account VA-2LNY,
which are available for investment by contract owners of the
Dreyfus/Transamerica Triple Advantage Variable Annuity, included in
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No.
333-104243) and related Prospectus of Dreyfus/Transamerica Triple Advantage
Variable Annuity.


                                                       /s/Ernst & Young LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
April 25, 2003
Order entered November 14, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00106
- CV
GORDON CARROLL FISHE R, Appellant

V. DANIEL K. HAGOOD, P. C. AND FITZPATRICK HAGOOD SMI TH AND UHL, INC., Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 13
- 05268
- A



### O RDER In their letter filed October 31, 2019, appellees stipulated that due to the ir settlement with Gene E. Phillips on Se ptember 10, 2018, “[t]he effect of the settlement credit is that, as of September 10, 2018, the amount of the arbitration award/judgment due and owing by Fisher is reduced to $602,583.24, plus interest of $ 4 9.52 per day until paid.” At submission, the Cou rt asked appellant’s counsel if he agreed that amount was correct. Appellant’s counsel stated he would review the matter and notify the Court whether he agreed to appellees’ stipulation. As of the date of this order, appellant has not communicated with th e Court regarding the stipulation. Accordingly, the Court requests that appellant notify the Court by November 22, 2019 whether he agrees to the stipulation./s/ LANA MYERS PRESIDING JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60188 Summary Calendar

KAZEM BARKHORDARIAN, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

A73-712-546

- - - - - - - - - - February 15, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Kazem Barkhordarian petitions this court to review an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal seeking reversal of an order of deportation denying his applications for political asylum, withholding of deportation, and voluntary departure. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the BIA’s denials of Barkhordarian’s applications for asylum and withholding of deportation areNo. 98-60188 -2- supported by substantial evidence. Faddoul v. INS , 37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. at 1994). The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, is applicable to all aliens in proceedings on April 1, 1997, for whom a final order of deportation was entered more than thirty days after September 30, 1996. IIRIRA § 309(c)(4)(E); Eyoum v. INS , 125 F.3d 889, 891 (5th Cir. 1997). Under IIRIRA, this court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to review claims for discretionary relief, such as voluntary departure. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B); Eyoum , 125 F.3d at 891. Because the BIA’s final order of deportation was entered on March 13, 1998, we lack subject-matter jurisdiction to review Barkhordarian’s appeal regarding voluntary departure. The petition for review is DENIED.
Exhibit E 

Fourth Interim Fee Period (February 1, 2023 through May 31, 2023)

Total Invoiced

Date Submitted Monthly Period Covered Professional Fees Low High

1/10/2023 02/01/23 ‐ 02/28/23 $43,195.00 $77,516.00 $335,436.00

2/10/2023 03/01/23 ‐ 03/31/23 $173,356.50 $84,990.00 $406,236.00

3/13/2023 04/01/23 ‐ 04/30/23 $202,162.00 $193,220.00 $454,418.00

4/17/2023 05/01/23 ‐ 05/31/23 $296,542.00 $130,825.00 $313,980.00

$715,255.50 $486,551.00 $1,510,070.00

Budget Range

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24745-5 Filed:07/14/23 Entered:07/14/23 18:50:10 Desc:

Exhibit E Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 240,120
<CASH>                                          33,220
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              38,690
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,492
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                146,716
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             35,565
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 29,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   389,492
<PREMIUMS>                                     129,602
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              9,611
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,505
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  26,781
<BENEFITS>                                     107,592
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     37,389
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            16,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,743
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,194
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,551
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

RECE\VED 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

AUG 15 2m4 

HEARING DOCKET 

v. 

JOHN WALSH, 

Complainant, 

Respondent. 

FAA Case No: 

2014S0190111 

________________________ ; 

RESPONDENT'S HEARING REQUEST 

Respondent, JOHN WALSH, by and through his undersigned attorney, 

pursuant to 14 CFR 13.16 and 14 CFR 13.210, herewith requests a hearing on the 

Administrator's Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty, dated july 25,2014. 

Stuart A. Goldstein, P. A. 

7300 North Kendall Drive, Suite 380 

Miami, FL 33156 

Tel: (305) 670-1222 

Fax: (305) 400-0685 

Email: stuartgoldsteinpa@att.net 

!i (! ,j 

11 +-~-=' / rh;, · lu By: xf XJ .\ ~,rJ d ?:c•uc<I•VN;-~' 

Stuart A. Goldstein 

Attorney for Respondent 
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 11th day of August, 2014, the original and one 

copy of this Request was served via United States mail on: Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S. W., Washington, D. C., 20591; 

attention Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000, 

and tbat a copy was served via facsimile ( 404) 305-5223 and regular U.S. Mail upon 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq., Office of the Regional Counsel, 1700 Columbia 

Avenue, College Park, GA 30337. 

' 

By: A\;\")1\ <M, \;;c1'rlt1t:_ __ • · Stuart A. Goldstein
§ 121.575 Alcoholic beverages. ( a ) No person may drink any alcoholic beverage aboard an aircraft unless the certificate holder operating the aircraft has served that beverage to him.
( b ) No certificate holder may serve any alcoholic beverage to any person aboard any of its aircraft who— ( 1 ) Appears to be intoxicated;
( 2 ) Is escorting a person or being escorted in accordance with 49 CFR 1544.221; or
( 3 ) Has a deadly or dangerous weapon accessible to him while aboard the aircraft in accordance with 49 CFR 1544.219, 1544.221, or 1544.223.
( c ) No certificate holder may allow any person to board any of its aircraft if that person appears to be intoxicated.
( d ) Each certificate holder shall, within five days after the incident, report to the Administrator the refusal of any person to comply with paragraph (a) of this section, or of any disturbance caused by a person who appears to be intoxicated aboard any of its aircraft.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19219, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-118, 40 FR 17552, Apr. 21, 1975; Amdt. 121-178, 47 FR 13316, Mar. 29, 1982; Amdt. 121-275, 67 FR 31932, May 10, 2002]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.41

In accordance with the Company's Senior Staff Officer Stock Ownership Plan (the
"Plan"), senior staff officers of the Company are required to maintain ownership
of Company stock equivalent to a percentage of their base salary, as adjusted
for the applicable fiscal year. The Fiscal Year ending February 2004 is the
first year of the Plan. By the end of the Fiscal Year ending February 2008, the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company will be required to attain ownership
equal to two times (2X) base salary, and all other Senior Staff Officers will be
required to attain ownership equal to one times (1X) base salary. In order to
satisfy ownership requirements, the Plan participants must own and hold vested
and unencumbered shares of GTECH stock.
§ 142.31 Advertising limitations. ( a ) A certificate holder may not conduct, and may not advertise to conduct, any training, testing, and checking that is not approved by the Administrator if that training is designed to satisfy any requirement of this chapter.
( b ) A certificate holder whose certificate has been surrendered, suspended, revoked, or terminated must— ( 1 ) Promptly remove all indications, including signs, wherever located, that the training center was certificated by the Administrator; and
( 2 ) Promptly notify all advertising agents, or advertising media, or both, employed by the certificate holder to cease all advertising indicating that the training center is certificated by the Administrator.
§ 620.17 Special notice provisions for events related to noncompliance with minimum regulatory capital ratios. ( a ) For purposes of this section, “regulatory capital ratios” include the capital ratios specified in § 628.10 of this chapter and the permanent capital standard prescribed under § 615.5205 of this chapter.
( b ) When a Farm Credit bank or association determines that it is not in compliance with one or more applicable minimum regulatory capital ratios, that institution must prepare and provide to its shareholders and the FCA a notice stating that the institution has initially determined it is not in compliance with the minimum regulatory capital ratio or ratios. Such notice must be given within 30 days following the month end.
( c ) When notice is given under paragraph (b) of this section, the institution must also notify its shareholders and the FCA when the regulatory capital ratio or ratios that are the subject of such notice decrease by one half of 1 percent or more from the level reported in the original notice, or from that reported in a subsequent notice provided under this paragraph (c). This notice must be given within 45 days following the end of every quarter at which the institution's regulatory capital ratio or ratios decrease as specified.
( d ) Each institution required to prepare a notice under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section shall provide the notice to shareholders or publish it in any publication with circulation wide enough to be reasonably assured that all of the institution's shareholders have access to the information in a timely manner. The information required to be included in this notice must be conspicuous, easily understandable, and not misleading.
( e ) A notice, at a minimum, shall include: ( 1 ) A statement that: ( i ) Briefly describes the minimum regulatory capital ratios established by the FCA and the notice requirement of paragraph (b) of this section;
( ii ) Indicates the institution's current level of capital; and
( iii ) Notifies shareholders that the institution's capital is below the FCA minimum regulatory capital ratio or ratios.
( 2 ) A statement of the effect that noncompliance has had on the institution and its shareholders, including whether the institution is currently prohibited by statute or regulation from retiring stock or distributing earnings or whether the FCA has issued a capital directive or other enforcement action to the institution.
( 3 ) A complete description of any event(s) that may have significantly contributed to the institution's noncompliance with the minimum regulatory capital ratio or ratios.
( 4 ) A statement that the institution is required by regulation to provide another notice to shareholders within 45 days following the end of any subsequent quarter at which the regulatory capital ratio or ratios decrease by one half of 1 percent or more from the level reported in the notice.
[81 FR 49778, July 28, 2016]
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)   In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ron Howell, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: August 14, 2015By:\s\ Ron HowellRon HowellInterim Chief Financial Officer
#### § 121.653 [Reserved]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 14, 2017

NO. 03-17-00048-CV

A. W. and R. R., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES FIELD AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order terminating appellants’ parental rights signed on 

January 12, 2017. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that 

there was no reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order

terminating appellants’ parental rights. Because appellants are indigent and unable to pay costs, 

no adjudication of costs is made.
§ 797.9 Review procedures. ( a ) Unless an oral hearing is required by § 797.7(d), NCUA's review shall be a review of the written record of the claim.
( b ) If an oral hearing is required, NCUA shall provide the debtor with a reasonable opportunity for such a hearing. The oral hearing, however, shall not be an adversarial adjudication and need not take the form of a formal evidentiary hearing. All significant matters discussed at the hearing, however, will be carefully documented.
( c ) Any review required by this part, whether a review of the written record or an oral hearing, shall be conducted by a hearing official. When NCUA is the creditor agency and the debtor is an NCUA employee, NCUA shall contact any agency designated in appendix A to 5 CFR part 581 to arrange for a hearing official. When NCUA is the creditor agency and the debtor is not an NCUA employee (i.e., the debtor is employed by another federal agency, also known as the paying agency), and NCUA cannot provide a prompt and appropriate hearing, NCUA may contact an agent of the paying agency designated in appendix A to 5 CFR part 581 to arrange for a hearing official. The paying agency must cooperate with NCUA to provide a hearing official, as required by the FCCS.
( d ) The hearing official shall issue a final written decision based on documentary evidence and, if applicable, information developed at an oral hearing. The written decision shall be issued as soon as practicable after the review but not later than 60 days after the date on which the request for review was received by NCUA, unless the debtor requests a delay in the proceedings. A delay in the proceedings shall be granted if the hearing official determines that there is good cause to grant the delay. If a delay is granted, the 60-day decision period shall be extended by the number of days by which the review was postponed.
( e ) Upon issuance of the written opinion, NCUA shall promptly notify the debtor of the hearing official's decision. The notification shall include a copy of the written decision issued by the hearing official.
Order filed April 28 , 2016.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00989

- CR

____________ JAMEL JUREA WILLIA MS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1426876



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due January 11, 2016

. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.1. The record comprises six volumes. Volumes 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 have been
filed. Patricia Palmer is responsible for filing volume 5

. This court has granted
Palmer three extensions until March 21, 2016 to file volume 5. When the last extension was granted, we stated that no further extensions would be granted.
Volume 5 has not been filed.Accordingly, we ORDER Patricia Palmer to file v olume 5 of the record by

May 12 , 2016

. I f volume 5 of the record is not timely filed as ordered
, this court will abate the appeal and order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason
f or failure to file the volume

.

PER CURIAM