36–641 

110TH CONGRESS REPT. 110–185 " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session Part 2 

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED 

AGENCIES APPROPRIATION BILL, 2008 

JULY13, 2007.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. VISCLOSKY of Indiana, from the Committee on Appropriations, 

submitted the following 

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 

[To accompany H.R. 2641] 

The Committee on Appropriations submits the following additional report in explanation of H.R. 2641, making appropriations 

for Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies for the 

fiscal year ending September 30, 2008. This report augments, but 

does not replace, instructions and guidance provided in House Report 110–185, the initial report filed by the Committee on this bill 

on June 11, 2007. With this new report, the Committee has updated its recommendations to give direction to agencies regarding 

funding for specific projects and to comply with clause 9 of rule XXI 

as it relates to transparency requirements when projects have been 

requested by Members of Congress. It also includes Committee recommendations related to projects requested by the executive 

branch as part of the Administration’s fiscal year 2008 budget. 

In allocating the funds made available by this bill for various 

agencies and appropriations accounts, the Committee directs that 

the following projects be funded: 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING

ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
(3) 

TITLE I 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE—CIVIL 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CIVIL


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
4 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 3 HR185.001
5 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 4 HR185.002
6 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 5 HR185.003
7 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 6 HR185.004
8 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 7 HR185.005
9 

Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration, Louisiana.—The 

budget request includes $13,000,000 for this study. The Committee 

remains supportive of the effort; however, due to large unobligated 

balances the Committee recommends $3,000,000. 

National Programs, Flood Plain Management Services.—For fiscal year 2008, the Committee has recommended $11,000,000 for 

flood plain management services, $5,375,000 above the budget request. With the funds provided, the Corps is directed to undertake 

the following studies with the amounts allocated below: 

Bucks County, Pennsylvania .......................................................................... $250,000 

City of Albany, Georgia ................................................................................... 250,000 

Whitehall, Mason Run, Ohio .......................................................................... 800,000 

Will County, Illinois ........................................................................................ 500,000 

National Programs, Planning Assistance to States.—For fiscal 

year 2008, the Committee has recommended $9,624,000 for planning assistance to states, $5,074,000 above the budget request. 

With the funds provided, the Corps is directed to undertake the following studies with the amounts allocated below: 

City of Perry, Iowa .......................................................................................... $23,000 

Guist Creek Lake, Kentucky .......................................................................... 160,000 

La Mirada, California ...................................................................................... 150,000 

Lake Rogers, Creekmoor, North Carolina ..................................................... 60,000 

Lehigh River Basin, Pennsylvania ................................................................. 175,000 

McHenry County, Illinois ................................................................................ 300,000 

Memphis, Tennesse ......................................................................................... 200,000 

Southington Water Supply Study, Connecticut ............................................ 100,000 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
10 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 9 HR185.006
11 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 10 HR185.007
12 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 11 HR185.008
13 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 12 HR185.009
14 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 13 HR185.010
15 

Santa Ana River mainstem, California.—The Committee has recommended an increase of $4,000,000 above the Administration’s request of $17,000,000 to continue studies to ascertain the nature 

and extent of water quality degradation in the Santa Ana River resulting from the construction and operation of Seven Oaks Dam 

and to amend the Seven Oaks Dam water control plan in light of 

current conditions and requirements. 

Chicago sanitary and ship canal, Illinois.—For fiscal year 2008, 

the Committee has recommended $750,000 for the Chicago sanitary 

and ship canal for the operation and maintenance of barrier I; an 

additional $6,900,000 is provided subject to authorization for the 

completion of barrier II. The Committee fully supports this critical 

project to prevent the movement of invasive fish species into the 

Great Lakes. 

Ohio environmental infrastructure.—For fiscal year 2008, the 

Committee has recommended $19,500,000 for Ohio environmental 

infrastructure. These funds shall be distributed as follows: 

Airpark, Ohio ......................................................................................... $1,600,000 

Arbaugh-Hope, Ohio ........................................................................................ 200,000 

Bloomingburg, Ohio ......................................................................................... 500,000 

Brookfield, Ohio ............................................................................................... 850,000 

Brown Street, Campus West, Ohio ................................................................ 1,800,000 

City of Stowe, Ohio .......................................................................................... 250,000 

Culpepper Area Water System, Ohio ............................................................. 1,600,000 

Defiance County, Auglaize River, Ohio ......................................................... 600,000 

Elyria, Ohio ...................................................................................................... 350,000 

Euclid Creek, Ohio .......................................................................................... 3,600,000 

Louisville, Ohio ................................................................................................ 800,000 

Marysville, Ohio ............................................................................................... 800,000 

Mayfield Heights, Ohio ................................................................................... 500,000 

Orrville, Ohio ................................................................................................... 650,000 

Painsville, Ohio ................................................................................................ 800,000 

Perry Township, Ohio ...................................................................................... 550,000 

Put-in-Bay, Ohio .............................................................................................. 950,000 

Struthers, Ohio ................................................................................................ 1,300,000 

Timberlake, Ohio ............................................................................................. 400,000 

Williamsburg Water Treatment Plant, Ohio ................................................. 400,000 

Windam, Ohio .................................................................................................. 1,000,000 

Northeast Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania.—The Committee has recommended $2,000,000, of which $1,000,000 is for Nicholson Borough and $1,000,000 is for Towanda, Pennsylvania. 

Southeastern Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania.—Within the funds 

provided, $1,000,000 is for Tacony Creek, Philadelphia, $50,000 for 

Whitpain Township, and $240,000 for the Borough of Hatfield, 

Pennsylvania. 

Levisa and Tug Forks & Upper Cumberland River, West Virginia, 

Virginia, & Kentucky.—For fiscal year 2008, the Committee recommends a total of $l0,000,000. Within the amounts provided, 

$7,000,000 shall be for elements of the project in the Commonwealth of Kentucky and the remaining $3,000,000 shall be available for the Commonwealth of Virginia elements of the project. 

National Programs, Abandoned Mine Restoration.—For fiscal 

year 2008, the Committee has recommended $525,000 for Mt. Diablo, California. 

Continuing Authorities Programs, Emergency Streambank Restoration.—For fiscal year 2008, the Committee has recommended 

$10,000,000 for this program and recommends no congressionally 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
16 

directed projects. This program provides authority for the Corps to 

design and construct emergency streambank and shoreline protection works to protect public highways and bridges, and other public 

works, and nonprofit services such as hospitals and schools. The 

Committee is concerned that by directing specific projects, there 

may be instances where true emergencies are not addressed. However, should the Corps fail to properly manage this program, the 

Committee will reconsider this position. The Corps is reminded 

that this authority is for emergency situations where imminent 

failure of the streambank or shoreline would adversely impact public facilities. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
17 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 16 HR185.011
18 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 17 HR185.012
19 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 18 36392A.013
20 

Mississippi River Levees, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO.—The Committee has recommended $35,476,000 for this project. Within the 

funds provided, $6,800,000 shall be available for the New Madrid 

Levee Closure and Box Culvert. 

Wolf River, Tennessee.—The Committee has recommended 

$200,000 for this project to complete plans and specifications and 

fully fund construction of the hiking trails within the 2,100 acre 

wildlife corridor. 

Wappapello Lake, Missouri.—The Committee has recommended 

$6,000,000 for this project within Region 8 Lower Mississippi, in 

addition to the amount requested, to address required actions related to the relocation of U.S. Highway 67 necessary as a result of 

changes to the operation of the project. The Committee directs the 

Corps to properly budget for the remaining cost of relocations that 

have resulted from changes to the operation of the project. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
21 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 20 36392A.014
22 

Region 01 

Aunt Lydia’s Cove, Massachusetts.—The Committee has recommended $400,000 for this project. 

Block Island Harbor, Rhode Island.—The Committee has recommended $150,000 for this project. 

Boston Harbor (Inner harbor), Massachusetts.—The Committee 

has recommended $1,000,000 for this project, in addition to the 

budget request. 

Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut.—The Committee has recommended $750,000 for this project. 

Green Harbor Marshfield, Massachusetts.—The Committee has 

recommended $2,000,000 for this project. 

Hampton Harbor, New Hampshire.—The Committee has recommended $120,000 for this project. 

Mystic River, Connecticut.—The Committee has recommended 

$400,000 for this project. 

Newburyport Harbor, Massachusetts.—The Committee has recommended $1,400,000 for this project. 

Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut.—The Committee has recommended $8,000,000 for this project. 

Sesuit Harbor, Massachusetts.—The Committee has recommended $250,000 for this project. 

Westport River, Massachusetts.—The Committee has recommended $120,000 for this project. 

Region 02 

AIWW; Dismal Swamp Canal, Virginia.—The Committee has 

recommended $339,000 for this project, in addition to the budget 

request. 

Appomattox River, Virginia.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,500,000 for this project. 

Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Maryland.—The Committee has 

recommended $2,845,000 for this project, in addition to the budget 

request. 

Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey.—The Committee has recommended 

$2,000,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Boston Harbor (Inner harbor), Massachusetts.—The Committee 

has recommended $1,000,000 for this project, in addition to the 

budget request. 

Broad Creek, Virginia.—The Committee has recommended 

$700,000 for this project. 

Cocheco River, Dover, New Hampshire.—The Committee has recommended $1,800,000 for this project. 

Cowanesque Lake, Pennsylvania.—The Committee has recommended $380,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

East Branch Clarion River Lake, Pennsylvania.—The Committee 

has recommended $100,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Glen Cove Creek, New York.—The Committee has recommended 

$350,000 for this project. 

Jamaica Bay, New York.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,000,000 for this project. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
23 

James River Channel, Virginia.—The Committee has recommended $1,410,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Jones Inlet, New York.—The Committee has recommended 

$4,900,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Long Island Sound Dredge Material Management Plan (DMMP), 

Connecticut and New York.—The Committee has recommended 

$2,000,000 for the Long Island Sound DMMP, in addition to the 

budget request. 

Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, New Jersey.—The 

Committee has recommended $500,000 for this project, in addition 

to the budget request. 

Norfolk Harbor, Virginia.—The Committee has recommended 

$4,000,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Parish Creek, Maryland.—The Committee has recommended 

$60,000 for the Parish Creek project. 

Poplar Island, Maryland.—The Committee has recommended 

$3,780,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Schuylkill River at Girard Point, Pennsylvania.—The Committee 

has recommended $100,000 for this project. 

Shark River, New Jersey.—The Committee has recommended 

$225,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pennsylvania.—The Committee has recommended $401,000 for this project, in addition to the amount requested. 

Tyler’s Beach, Virginia.—The Committee has recommended 

$870,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Wicomico River, Wicomico County, Maryland.—The Committee 

has recommended $700,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Wilmington Harbor, New Castle County, Delaware.—The Committee has recommended $2,950,000 for this project, in addition to 

the budget request. 

Region 03 

Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Alabama.—The Committee has recommended $2,200,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Allatoona Lake, Georgia.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,170,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW), Georgia.—The Committee has recommended $2,543,000 for the portion of the AIWW 

in Georgia, in addition to the budget request. 

Buford Dam and Lake Sidney Lanier, Georgia.—The Committee 

has recommended $500,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Canaveral Harbor, Florida.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,000,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Carolina Beach Inlet, North Carolina.—The Committee has recommended $1,230,000 for this project. 

Escambia and Conecuh Rivers, Florida.—The Committee has recommended $320,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
24 

Everglades and South Florida, Seminole Big Cypress, Florida.—

The Committee has recommended $300,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Georgetown Harbor, South Carolina.—The Committee has recommended $3,890,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Horseshoe Cove, Florida.—The Committee has recommended 

$2,700,000 for this project. 

Intracoastal Waterway (IWW), Jacksonville to Miami, Florida.—

The Committee has recommended $2,000,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, 

Florida.—The Committee has recommended $1,350,000 for this 

project, in addition to the budget request. 

Manatee Harbor, Florida.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,500,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Alabama.—The Committee has recommended $217,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Naples to Big Marco Pass, Florida.—The Committee has recommended $1,500,000 for this project. 

New Topsail Inlet and Connecting channels, North Carolina.—

The Committee has recommended $670,000 for this project. 

Palm Beach Harbor, Florida.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,830,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, Alabama.—The Committee has 

recommended $1,500,000 for this project, in addition to the budget 

request. 

Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Alabama & Mississippi.—The 

Committee has recommended $1,200,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Region 04 

Great Lakes Navigation.—The Committee has recommended 

$10,000,000 for navigation improvements on the Great Lakes Region, in addition to the budget request. 

Arcadia Harbor, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended 

$160,000 for this project. 

Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio.—The Committee has recommended 

$2,000,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Buffalo Harbor, New York.—The Committee has recommended 

$200,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Burns Waterway harbor, Indiana.—The Committee has recommended $1,800,000 for the Burns Waterway harbor, in addition 

to the amount requested in the budget. Dredging activities should 

place priority on the Bailly intake pipe area. 

Burns Waterway small boat harbor, Indiana.—The Committee 

has recommended $61,000 for this project. 

Clinton River, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended 

$660,000 for this project. 

Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota & Wisconsin.—The Committee has recommended $300,000 for the Duluth-Superior Harbor 

project, in addition to the budget request. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
25 

Green Bay Harbor, Wisconsin.—The Committee has recommended $1,460,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Huron Harbor, Ohio.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,000,000 for this project. 

Irondequoit Harbor, New York.—The Committee has recommended $400,000 for this project. 

Kewaunee Harbor, Wisconsin.—The Committee has recommended 

$430,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Lake Superior Small Harbor Dredging, Wisconsin.—The Committee has recommended $1,589,000 to respond to maintenance 

needs of small harbors on Lake Superior. 

Leland Harbor, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended 

$190,000 for this project. 

Lexington Harbor, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended 

$175,000 for this project. 

Menominee, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,000,000 for this project. 

Michigan City Harbor, Indiana.—The Committee has recommended $2,000,000 for this project. 

Monroe Harbor, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended 

$550,000 for this project. 

Pentwater Harbor, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended 

$163,000 for this project. 

Port Sanilac Harbor, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended $150,000 for this project 

Portage Lake, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended 

$245,000 for this project. 

Rieck’s Lake, Wisconsin.—The Committee has recommended 

$65,000 for this project. 

Rochester Harbor, New York.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,600,000 for this project. 

Saginaw River, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,752,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Saugatuck Harbor, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended 

$315,000 for this project. 

South Haven Harbor, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended $302,000 for this project. 

St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended 

$400,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Sturgeon Bay Harbor & Lake Michigan Ship Canal, Wisconsin.—

The Committee has recommended $630,000 for this project, in addition to budget request. 

White Lake Harbor, Michigan.—The Committee has recommended $125,000 for this project. 

Region 05 

Ohio River Navigation.—The Committee has recommended 

$5,000,000 for Ohio River Navigation Improvements, in addition to 

the budget request to implement improvements identified in the 

five-year plan. 

Dale Hollow Lake, Tennessee.—The Committee has recommended 

$350,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
26 

Elvis Stahr (Hickman) Harbor, Kentucky.—The Committee has 

recommended $1,830,000 for this project, in addition to the budget 

request. 

J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee.—The Committee 

has recommended $500,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request for recreation upgrades. 

Ohio River Locks & Dams, West Virginia, Kentucky & Ohio.—The 

Committee has recommended $1,000,000 for the Ohio River Locks 

and Dams for recreation improvements at Parkersburg, in addition 

to the budget request. 

Paintsville Lake, Kentucky.—The Committee has recommended 

$150,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Tionesta Lake, Pennsylvania.—The Committee has recommended 

$225,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Upper Monongahela River Automation Project, West Virginia.—

The Committee has recommended $350,000 for this project. 

Region 07 

St. Paul Lower Harbor, Minnesota.—The Committee has recommended $100,000 for this project. 

Sunset boat basin, Illinois.—The Committee has recommended 

$100,000 for this project 

Waukegan Harbor, Illinois.—The Committee has recommended 

$582,000 for the Waukegan Harbor, in addition to the budget request. 

Region 08 

Houma Navigation Canal, Louisiana.—The Committee has recommended $4,065,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Mississippi River Project (MVR).—The Committee has recommended $150,000 for Mill Creek South Slough, Illinois, in addition to the budget request for the Mississippi River project. 

Ouachita and Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana.—The Committee has recommended $5,400,000 for this project, in addition to 

the budget request. 

Wolf River, Tennessee.—The Committee has recommended 

$400,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Region 10 

Clinton Lake, Kansas.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,125,000, to be used for the dam toe road access and dam road 

repairs, in addition to the budget request. 

Region 11 

El Dorado Lake, Kansas.—The Committee has recommended 

$150,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, Oklahoma.—

The Committee has recommended $1,549,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Table Rock Lake, Missouri.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,500,000 for the operation and maintenance of this project, in addition to the budget request. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
27 

White River, Arkansas.—The Committee has recommended 

$4,700,000 for maintenance of the navigation channel, in addition 

to the budget request. 

Region 12 

Benbrook Lake, Texas.—In addition to the amount requested, 

$502,000 is recommended for this project. 

Brazos Island Harbor, Texas.—The Committee has recommended 

$3,000,000 for this project. 

Houston Ship Channel, Texas.—The Committee has recommended $1,000,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Lake Waco, Texas.—The Committee has recommended $1,500,000 

for this project, in addition to the amount requested for the replacement of failing water delivery systems and for necessary repairs resulting from recent flooding. 

Lake Whitney, Texas.—In addition to the amount requested, 

$2,000,000 is recommended for Ham Creek and $1,000,000 is recommended for necessary repairs resulting from recent flooding. 

Lewisville Dam, Texas.—The Committee has recommended 

$2,000,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Town Bluff Dam, Texas.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,345,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request for improvements at Campers Cove, Sandy Creek, and East End. 

Region 13 

Rio Grande Bosque Rehabilitation, New Mexico.—The Committee 

has recommended $2,000,000 for this project. 

Region 17 

Columbia River at Baker Bay, Washington.—The Committee has 

recommended $640,000 for this project. 

Coos Bay, Oregon.—The Committee has recommended $3,000,000 

for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Grays Harbor, Washington.—The Committee has recommended 

$3,095,000 for the operation and maintenance of this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Siuslaw River, Oregon.—The Committee has recommended 

$219,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Tillamook Bay & Bar, Oregon.—The Committee has recommended $2,000,000 for this project. 

Umpqua River, Oregon.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,244,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Yaquina River, Oregon.—The Committee has recommended 

$848,000 for this project. 

Region 18 

Dry Creek (Warm Springs) lake and channel, California.—The 

Committee has recommended $657,000 for this project in addition 

to the budget request. Of the funds provided, $104,000 shall be 

available to update the inundation maps for the project. 

Jack D. Maltester Channel (San Leandro), California.—The Committee has recommended $2,500,000 for this project. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
28 

Moss Landing Harbor, California.—The Committee has recommended $2,530,000 for this project, in addition to the budget request. 

Noyo Harbor, California.—The Committee has recommended 

$1,475,000 for this project. 

Oakland Harbor, California.—The Committee has recommended 

$2,690,000 for the Oakland Harbor, in addition to the amount requested. 

Pillar Point Harbor, California.—The Committee has recommended $2,580,000 for this project. 

Pinole Shoal management study, California.—The Committee 

has recommended $500,000 for the Pinole Shoal management 

study. 

San Francisco Bay Harbor & Bay (Drift Removal), California.— The Committee has recommended $1,195,000 for the San Francisco 

Bay Harbor & Bay Drift Removal, in addition to the amount requested. 

San Francisco Bay Harbor, California.—The Committee has recommended $400,000 for the San Francisco Bay Harbor to advance 

the Ocean Beach Nourishment project, in addition to the budget request. 

San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy, California.—The Committee has recommended $2,500,000 for this 

project. 

San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, California.—The Committee has recommended $2,650,000 for the San Pablo Bay and 

Mare Island Strait project. 

San Rafael Channel, California.—The Committee has recommended $2,175,000 for this project. 

Suisun Bay Channel, California.—The Committee has recommended $518,000 for the Suisun Bay Channel, in addition to the 

budget request. 

National Programs 

Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material.—Within the funds provided, 

$250,000 shall be available for the Wynn Road, Oregon, Ohio 

project. 

Navigation Mitigation Projects.—Within the funds provided, 

$250,000 shall be available for the Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine project 

and $300,000 shall be available for the Mattituck Harbor, New 

York project. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
(29) 

TITLE II 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
30 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 32 here HR185.015
31 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 33 here HR185.016
32 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 34 here HR185.017
33 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 35 here HR185.018
34 

Salton Sea Research Project, California.—The Committee recommendation provides $2,000,000 for the Salton Sea research 

project, including $1,000,000 to continue environmental restoration 

efforts at the Alamo and New Rivers, and for other authorized pilot 

projects. 

Southern California investigations program.—The Committee 

recommendation provides $1,090,000 for the Southern California 

investigations program, including $400,000 for the Water Replenishment District regional groundwater monitoring program and 

$500,000 is provided to assist the Lake Arrowhead Community 

Services District to develop an integrated water resource plan. 

Southern Utah investigations program.—The Committee recommendation provides $414,000 for the Southern Utah investigations program, including $300,000 for the San Juan River water 

pipeline study. 

Title XVI water reclamation and reuse program.—The Committee 

recommendation provides $2,800,000 for the Title XVI water reclamation and reuse program, of which $2,000,000 shall be for the 

WateReuse Foundation. 

Central Valley project, American River Division.—Within funds 

provided, $1,300,000 shall be available for the El Dorado Temperature control device. 

Central Valley project, Friant Division.—Within funds provided, $1,000,000 shall be available for the Friant-Kern and Madera canals. 

CALIFORNIA BAY-DELTA RESTORATION

California Bay-Delta Restoration.—The Committee recommendation provides $40,750,000 for California Bay-Delta Restoration. 

Within the funds provided, $2,000,000 shall be available for the Inland Empire regional water recycling project. In addition, 

$1,000,000 is provided, instead of $500,000 as requested in the Administration’s budget, for the Contra Costa Water District alternative intake project. 

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT RESTORATION FUND

Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.—Within the funds pro- vided, not less than $7,432,000 shall be available for Sacramento 

Fish Screen Projects, instead of $4,432,000 as requested in the Administration’s budget. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
(35) 

TITLE III 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
36 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 38 here HR185.019
37 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 39 here HR185.020
38 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 40 here HR185.021
39 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 41 here HR185.022
40 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 42 here HR185.023
41 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 43 here HR185.024
42 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 44 here HR185.025
(43) 

TITLE IV 

INDEPENDENT AGENCIES 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
44 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 46 here 36392A.026
45 

EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE BRANCH PROJECTS 

Compliance with Rules of the House.—The list of projects which 

follows is submitted in compliance with clause 9 of rule XXI of the 

Rules of the House of Representatives, which requires publication 

of a complete list of projects included in the bill which result principally from requests of Members of the House of Representatives. 

In addition, the list includes projects of a similar character which 

are funded in the bill and report and which have been requested 

in the Administration Budget for fiscal year 2008. Programmatic 

increases that impact spacific projects are also noted. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
46 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 48 here HR185.027
47 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 49 here HR185.028
48 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 50 here HR185.029
49 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 51 here HR185.030
50 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 52 here HR185.031
51 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 53 here HR185.032
52 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 54 here HR185.033
53 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 55 here HR185.034
54 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 56 here HR185.035
55 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 57 here HR185.036
56 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 58 here HR185.037
57 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 59 here HR185.038
58 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 60 here HR185.039
59 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 61 here HR185.040
60 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 62 here HR185.041
61 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 63 here HR185.042
62 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGInsert offset folio 64/100 here HR185.043