CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Sacramento Metropolit an Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 465 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended September 25, 2008

Rule Title(s): Polyester Resin Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: May 18, 2009

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Amended June 4, 1998

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Kevin J. Williams Phone Number: (916) 874-4851 E-mail Address: kjwilliams@airquality.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The adopted amendments reduced the VOC limit for cleaning ma terials to 25 g/l in Section 303 and increased the

emission control system efficiency requirement to 90% in Section 301.2. The adopted amendment added an

expiration date to the exemption for cleaning material requi rements. The expiration date is set on September 25,

2009.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Ca tegory: The 1994 SIP included a commitment to reduce VOC

emissions from surface preparation and cleanup solvents by 2.9 tpd from the Sacramento district. Surface

preparation and cleanup solvents are included in multiple rules. Prior to amendment of this rule, the district had

reduced emissions from this category by 2.5 tpd. This ru le amendment reduces emissions from this category by 1.7

tons per year (0.005 tpd). Together with the 2008 amendm ents to eight other prohibitory rules with surface

preparation and cleanup requirements, the total emission reducti on from this category is now 3 tpd, which satisfies

the SIP commitment.

Inventory Year Used to Calcul ate Changes in Emissions: 2010 Area Affected: Sacramento County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control M easure: 5.6 tpd for t he Sacramento district.

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Cont rol Measure: 2.9 tpd fo r the Sacramento district.

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 5

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 301.1 and 303 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reducti ons are: work practice standards in Section 302 and 304 and

installation of an emission control device in Se ction 301.2 in lieu to complying with 301.1.

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 301.1 and 303 Work Practice Standards in Section(s): 302 and 304

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 501 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: Reduces emissions and makes progress toward reasonable further progress and attainment.