### 23351 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 81 / Monday, April 28, 2014 / Notices

turnover, which may affect future motor vehicle emissions inventories, lead to motor vehicle emissions estimates above the Tier 1 MVEBs. The determination will be made through the interagency consultation process and fully documented within the first conformity analysis that uses the Tier 2 MVEBs. Receipt of the submittal was announced on EPA’s transportation conformity Web site. No comments were received. The findings letter is available at EPA’s conformity Web site: http:// www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/ transconf/adequacy.htm. The adequate direct particulate matter (PM) and NO

x MVEBs for Tier 1 and Tier 2 are provided in Table 1 and Table 2.



### TABLE 

### 1—T IER 

### 1 O N 

### -R OAD 

### MVEB S 

### C ONTAINED IN THE 

### WASHINGTON 

### A REA 

### M AINTENANCE 

### P LAN FOR THE 

### 1997 PM 2.5 

### NAAQS

Year Motor vehicle emissions budget for PM 2.5 on-road

emissions (tons per year) Mobile vehicle emissions budget for NO X on-road

emissions (tons per year)

2017 .......... 1,787 41,709 2025 .......... 1,350 27,400



### TABLE 

### 2—T IER 

### 2 O N 

### -R OAD 

### MVEB S 

### C ONTAINED IN THE 

### WASHINGTON 

### A REA 

### M AINTENANCE 

### P LAN FOR THE 

### 1997 PM 2.5 

### NAAQS

Year Motor vehicle emissions budget for PM 2.5 on-road

emissions (tons per year) Mobile vehicle emissions budget for NO X on-road

emissions (tons per year)

2017 .......... 2,144 50,051 2025 .......... 1,586 32,880

Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA’s conformity rule requires that transportation plans, transportation improvement programs, and projects conform to SIPs and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not they do. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards.

The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP’s MVEBs are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). EPA described the process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in a July 1, 2004 preamble starting at 69 FR 40038 and used the information in these resources in making this adequacy determination. The Commonwealth of Virginia did not provide emission budgets for sulfur dioxide (SO 2), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), or ammonia for the Washington Area’s Maintenance Plan because it concluded that emissions of these precursors from motor vehicles are not significant contributors to the area’s PM 2.5 air quality problem. The transportation conformity rule provision at 40 CFR 93.102(b)(2)(v) indicates that conformity does not apply for these precursors, due to the lack of motor vehicle emissions budgets for these precursors and state’s conclusion that motor vehicle emissions of SO 2 , VOCs, and ammonia do not contribute significantly to the area’s PM 2.5 nonattainment problem. This provision of the transportation conformity rule predates and was not disturbed by the January 4, 2013 decision in the litigation on the PM 2.5 implementation rule. EPA has preliminarily concluded that the Commonwealth’s decision to not include budgets for SO 2 , VOCs, and ammonia is consistent with the requirements of the transportation conformity rule. That decision does not affect EPA’s adequacy finding for the submitted direct PM and NO
x MVEBs for the Washington Area’s Maintenance Plan.

Please note that an adequacy review is separate from EPA’s completeness review, and should not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate approval action for the SIP. Even if EPA finds the budgets for the Washington Area’s Maintenance Plan adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved. The finding and the response to comments are available at EPA’s conformity Web site: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q. Dated: April 11, 2014. W.C. Early, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2014–09577 Filed 4–25–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2013–0677; FRL–9909–77]**

**Receipt of Test Data Under the Toxic Substances Control Act** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is announcing its receipt of test data submitted pursuant to a test rule issued by EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). As required by TSCA, this document identifies each chemical substance and/ or mixture for which test data have been received; the uses or intended uses of such chemical substance and/or mixture; and describes the nature of the test data received. Each chemical substance and/or mixture related to this announcement is identified in Unit I. under **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For technical information contact: Kathy Calvo, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (202) 564–8089; email address: calvo.kathy@epa.gov.

For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 554– 1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. Chemical Substances and/or Mixtures

Information about the following chemical substance and/or mixture is provided in Unit IV.:

• Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3- (benzoyloxy)-2, 2, 4-trimethylpentyl ester (CASRN 22527–63–5). II. Authority

Section 4(d) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2603(d)) requires EPA to publish a notice in the Federal Register reporting the receipt of test data submitted pursuant to test rules promulgated under TSCA section 4 (15 U.S.C. 2603).

III. Docket Information

A docket, identified by the docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– OPPT–2013–0677, has been established for this Federal Register document that announces the receipt of data. The test data received have been added to the docket for the TSCA section 4 test rule that required the test data. Use the document ID number provided in Unit IV. to access the test data in the docket for the related TSCA section 4 test rule.

The docket for this Federal Register document and the docket for each related TSCA section 4 test rule is available electronically at http:// www.regulations.gov or in person at the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,


### 23352 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 81 / Monday, April 28, 2014 / Notices

DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202) 566–0280. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available
at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

IV. Test Data Received

This unit contains the information required by TSCA section 4(d) for the test data received by EPA.

Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3- (benzoyloxy)-2, 2, 4-trimethylpentyl ester (CASRN 22527–63–5)

1. Chemical Use: Plasticizer.
2. Applicable Test Rule: Chemical testing requirements for third group of high production volume chemicals (HPV3), 40 CFR 799.5089.

3. Test Data Received: The following listing describes the nature of the test data received. The test data have been added to the docket for the applicable TSCA section 4 test rule and can be found by referencing the document ID numbers provided. EPA reviews of test data will be added to the same docket upon completion.

Health Effect. Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity with Reproduction/ Development Toxicity Screening: Oral. The document ID number assigned to this data is EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009–
0112–0238. List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Hazardous substances, Reporting and Recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: April 17, 2014. Maria J. Doa, Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2014–09669 Filed 4–25–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9910–07–OSWER]**

**Santa Fe Springs Drums Site, Santa Fe Springs, CA; Notice of Proposed**  **CERCLA Settlement Agreement for Recovery of Past Response Costs** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice; request for comment.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement with two parties for recovery of response costs concerning the Santa Fe Springs Drums Superfund Site in Santa Fe Springs, California. The settlement is entered into pursuant to Section 122(h)(1) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), and it requires the settling parties to pay $90,000 to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (Agency). The settlement includes a covenant not to sue the settling parties pursuant to Sections 106 or 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 or 9607(a). For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this Notice in the Federal Register , the Agency will receive written comments relating to the settlement. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105.

**DATES :**  Pursuant to Section 122(i) of CERCLA, EPA will receive written comments relating to this proposed settlement until May 28, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  The proposed settlement is available for public inspection at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. A copy of the proposed settlement may be obtained from Thanne Berg, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, ORC–3, San Francisco, CA 94105, telephone number 415–972–3908. Comments should reference the Santa Fe Springs Drums Superfund Site, Santa Fe Springs, California and should be addressed to Thanne Berg at the above address.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Thanne Berg, Assistant Regional Counsel (ORC–3), Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105; phone: (415) 972–3908; fax: (417) 947–3570; email: berg.elizabeth@
epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Parties to the Proposed Settlement: Cindy Lee Bosshard and the Richard P. Harbaugh Living Trust UTD October 21, 2005.

Dated: April 16, 2014. Enrique Manzanilla, Director, Superfund Division, U.S. EPA, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2014–09575 Filed 4–25–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS**  **COMMISSION**

**Information Collection Being Submitted to the Office of Management**  **and Budget for Review and Approval**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for
comments.

**SUMMARY :**  As part of an effort to streamline the process to seek feedback from the public on service delivery, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has submitted a Generic Information Collection Request to OMB for review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The FCC invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid OMB control number.

**DATES :**  Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be submitted on or before May 28, 2014. If you anticipate that you will be submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the FCC contact listed below as soon as possible.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your PRA comments to Walter Boswell, Federal Communications Commission, via the Internet at walter.boswell@fcc.gov <mailto:walter.boswell@fcc.gov>.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Walter Boswell, Office of Managing Director, (202) 418–2178 or by email at walter.boswell@fcc.gov <mailto:walter.boswell@fcc.gov>.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**