alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Cosine Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terry Gibson, Director, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Terry Gibson
Terry Gibson
Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2005
Exhibit 32 (ii)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2007, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer (Principal
Financial Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

        (2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.



/s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN
----------------------
J. Robert Buchanan
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION   EXTRACTED   FROM
EPOLIN,  INC.'S  QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                             572,370
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      186,041
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        318,477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1,256,879
<PP&E>                             1,072,916
<DEPRECIATION>                     604,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1,884,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              68,576
<BONDS>                            0
<COMMON>                           2,216,983
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       1,884,216
<SALES>                            772,147
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   772,147
<CGS>                              270,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      270,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   358,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    152,254
<INCOME-TAX>                       26,034
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                126,220
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       126,220
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .01




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 16.1

Letter on change in certifying accountants

                                                             Barry L Friedman PC
                                                   Certified  Public  Accountant
                                                               1582 Tulita Drive
                                                         Las Vegas, Nevada 89123


                           March 17, 2000



Mr. Graham Andrews
President
Absolutefuture.com
10900 NE 8th Street, Suite 1414
Bellevue, WA 98004

Dear Mr. Andrews:

8-K FILING RE CHANGE OF AUDITOR

Thank you for the copy of the 8-K report filed on March 10, 2000 concerning the
change of auditors from Barry L Friedman PC to KPMG LLP. This letter is to
confirm that we agree with the statements made in the from 8-K.

Very truly yours,


/s/ BARRY L. FRIEDMAN
Barry L Friedman PC
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2016 (the “Report”), I, Teri W. Hunt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:



(1)     The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)     The information contained
in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|December 14, 2016 | /s/
    Teri W. Hunt       
|----------------- | ---------------------------
|                  | Teri W. Hunt,              
|                  | Chief Financial
    Officer
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CYIOS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2015-5152

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:15-cv-00148-PEC, Chief Judge Patricia E. 

Campbell-Smith.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JOSHUA B. DUVALL, Matross Edwards, LLC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

DELISA SANCHEZ, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented 

by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., 

DEBORAH A. BYNUM; MELLANY ALIO, Office of the Chief 

Counsel, United States Army Materiel Command Legal 

Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD; EVAN WILLIAMS, 
 

Contract and Fiscal Law Division, United States Army 

Legal Services Agency, Fort Belvoir, VA.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 February 8, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
Neffs Bancorp 10-Q







EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, that:





·
the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and


·
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations of the corporation as of the dates and for the periods expressed in this quarterly report.








/s/ Kevin A. Schmidt


Kevin A. Schmidt, Principal Financial Officer


Dated:  November 15, 2010
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust V (the “Trust”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.











/s/ Jeffrey H. StrasbergName:
Jeffrey H. StrasbergTitle:
Chief Executive and Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)Date:
February 18, 2011
#### § 158.5 Authority to impose PFC's.

Subject to the provisions of this part, the Administrator may grant authority to a public agency that controls a commercial service airport to impose a PFC of $1, $2, $3, $4, or $4.50 on passengers enplaned at such an airport. No public agency may impose a PFC under this part unless authorized by the Administrator. No State or political subdivision or agency thereof that is not a public agency may impose a PFC covered by this part.

[Doc. No. 26385, 56 FR 24278, May 29, 1991, as amended by Amdt. 158-2, 65 FR 34541, May 30, 2000]
#### § 137.77 Termination of operations.

Whenever a person holding an agricultural aircraft operator certificate ceases operations under this part, he shall surrender that certificate to the responsible Flight Standards office last having jurisdiction over his operation.

[Doc. No. 1464, 30 FR 8106, June 24, 1965, as amended by Amdt. 137-13, 54 FR 39294, Sept. 25, 1989; 54 FR 52872, Dec. 22, 1989; Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 137-17, 83 FR 9175, Mar. 5, 2018]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
         <LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
         EXTRACTED FROM THE NATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY CORPORATION 
         FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31,
         1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
         SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                           <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3,336
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 80,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                   8,200
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              75,193
<PP&E>                                       165,799
<DEPRECIATION>                               156,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                93,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,239,489
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                       14
<COMMON>                                      52,455
<OTHER-SE>                                 8,512,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  93,872
<SALES>                                      124,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             165,535
<CGS>                                         41,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2,245,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             333,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           113,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (2,568,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (2,568,334)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                             (2,568,334)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 161.401 Scope.

This subpart applies to an airport imposing a noise or access restriction on the operation of Stage 3 aircraft that first became effective after October 1, 1990, and had either been agreed to in compliance with the procedures in subpart B of this part or approved by the FAA in accordance with the procedures in subpart D of this part. This subpart does not apply to Stage 2 restrictions imposed by airports. This subpart does not apply to Stage 3 restrictions specifically exempted in § 161.7.
§ 135.213 Weather reports and forecasts. ( a ) Whenever a person operating an aircraft under this part is required to use a weather report or forecast, that person shall use that of the U.S. National Weather Service, a source approved by the U.S. National Weather Service, or a source approved by the Administrator. However, for operations under VFR, the pilot in command may, if such a report is not available, use weather information based on that pilot's own observations or on those of other persons competent to supply appropriate observations.
( b ) For the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, weather observations made and furnished to pilots to conduct IFR operations at an airport must be taken at the airport where those IFR operations are conducted, unless the Administrator issues operations specifications allowing the use of weather observations taken at a location not at the airport where the IFR operations are conducted. The Administrator issues such operations specifications when, after investigation by the U.S. National Weather Service and the responsible Flight Standards office, it is found that the standards of safety for that operation would allow the deviation from this paragraph for a particular operation for which an air carrier operating certificate or operating certificate has been issued.
[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-60, 61 FR 2616, Jan. 26, 1996; Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 135-139, 83 FR 9175, Mar. 5, 2018]
Editorial Note on Part 139
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

§ 139.307 Unpaved areas. ( a ) In a manner authorized by the Administrator, each certificate holder must maintain and promptly repair the surface of each gravel, turf, or other unpaved runway, taxiway, or loading ramp and parking area on the airport that is available for air carrier use as follows: ( 1 ) No slope from the edge of the full-strength surfaces downward to the existing terrain must be steeper than 2:1.
( 2 ) The full-strength surfaces must have adequate crown or grade to assure sufficient drainage to prevent ponding.
( 3 ) The full-strength surfaces must be adequately compacted and sufficiently stable to prevent rutting by aircraft or the loosening or build-up of surface material, which could impair directional control of aircraft or drainage.
( 4 ) The full-strength surfaces must have no holes or depressions that exceed 3 inches in depth and are of a breadth capable of impairing directional control or causing damage to an aircraft.
( 5 ) Debris and foreign objects must be promptly removed from the surface.
( b ) FAA Advisory Circulars contain methods and procedures for the maintenance and configuration of unpaved areas that are acceptable to the Administrator.
DENIED and Opinion Filed May 10, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-00421-CV

IN RE 1 COVENTRY COURT, LLC, MOSHE FELDHENDLER, AND 

LEAH FELDHENDLER, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-01541

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Pedersen, III, Nowell, and Miskel

Opinion by Justice Miskel

In their May 5, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relators seek relief from

the trial court’s contempt order. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to demonstrate that the trial 

court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy by appeal. 

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). Relators bear the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient record 

to show they are entitled to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 

1992) (orig. proceeding).
–2–

Relators’ record does not comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 52. See TEX.R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2). Specifically, the petition and 

record indicate that there were two hearings in connection with the contempt order 

from which relators seek mandamus relief. Relators did not include a properly 

authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from such contempt hearings or a 

statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the contempt order. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2). Without a sufficient record, relators have failed to carry 

their burden. 

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. 

230421f.p05

/Emily A. Miskel//

EMILY MISKEL

JUSTICE
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 23
         
               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


     We have issued our report dated January 19, 1998, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference or included in the
Annual Report of JeffBanks, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
said report in the Registration Statements of JeffBanks, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File
No. 333-36240, effective September 23, 1997; File No. 333-20111, effective
January 30, 1997; File No. 333-18775, effective January 21, 1997 and File No.
33-99988, effective November 24, 1995) and Forms S-8 (File No. 33-80654 and File
No. 33-80656, effective June 23, 1994).



/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 31, 1999
Sec. 19-2 Maintenance of data. ( a ) Each air carrier required to file Form 41 Schedule T-100 data shall maintain its operating statistics, covering the movement of traffic in accordance with the uniform classifications prescribed. Codes are prescribed for each operating element and service class. All traffic statistics shall be compiled in terms of each flight stage as actually performed.
( b ) Each carrier shall maintain data applicable to the specified traffic and capacity elements prescribed in section 19-5 and section 25, and by general service classes prescribed in section 19-4 of this part.
( c ) Operating statistics shall be maintained in accordance with the type of record, either nonstop segment or on-flight market.
( d ) Schedule T-100 collects summarized flight stage data and on-flight market data. All traffic statistics shall be compiled in terms of each revenue flight stage as actually performed. The detail T-100 data shall be maintained in a manner permitting monthly summarization and organization into two basic groupings: The nonstop segment information that must be summarized by equipment type, within class of service, within pair-of-points, without regard to individual flight numbers. The second grouping requires that the enplanement/deplanement information be broken out into separate units called “on-flight market records.” These records must be summarized by class of service, within pair-of-points, without regard for equipment type or flight number.
( e ) The Department may authorize joint-service operations between two direct air carriers. Examples of these joint-services are blocked-space agreements, part-charter agreements, code-share agreements, wet-lease agreements, and other similar arrangements. Joint services operations are reported by the air carrier in operational control of the aircraft. The traffic moving under these agreements is reported on Schedule T-100 the same way as any other traffic on the aircraft.
( f ) Any questions regarding T-100 should be e-mailed to *T100.Support@dot.gov .*
[53 FR 46305, Nov. 16, 1988, as amended at 75 FR 41583, July 16, 2010]
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

              AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 2000 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
              ----------------------------------------------------

     Section IV.C. of the Purchase Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:

          "Each offering period shall be comprised of a series of one or more
     successive Purchase Intervals. Purchase Intervals shall run from the first
     business day in January each year to the last business day in June of the
     same year and from the first business day in July each year to the last
     business day in December of the same year. However, the first Purchase
     Interval in effect under the initial offering period shall commence at the
     Effective Time and terminate on the last business day in December 2001."

     The following Corporate Affiliates are hereby added to Schedule A to the
Purchase Plan to be included in the Purchase Plan as Participating Corporations
and listed immediately below Multilink Technology Corporation on said Schedule
A:

     "Multilink Technology Canada, ULC (Canada)

     Multilink Technology GmbH (Germany)

     MLTC Israel, Ltd. (Israel)

     UAB Multilink Technology (Lithuania)

     UAB Multilink Technology Kaunas (Lithuania)

     Multilink Technology UK, Ltd (UK)"

     The second sentence of Paragraph R of the Appendix to the Purchase Plan is
hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

          "The initial Purchase Date shall be December 31, 2001."

     Paragraph S of the Appendix to the Purchase Plan is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following:

          "PURCHASE INTERVAL shall mean each successive six (6)-month period
     within the offering period at the end of which there shall be purchased
     shares of Common Stock on behalf of each Participant; provided, however,
     the first Purchase Interval in effect under the initial offering period
     shall commence at the Effective Time and terminate on the last business day
     in December 2001 and therefore may be shorter or longer than six (6)
     months."
#### Daniel Carney *v.*Timothy Kirby, et al.

In an action to recover a city assessment for a public improvement, tbe plaintiff will not be permitted to file the city ordinances as exhibits, or to embody them in his petition.

Special Term. — On demurrer to petition. Plaintiff' brings his action to recover the amount of an assessment issued to him by the city of Cincinnati to defray the cost of grading a public street, upon which the defendant owns property.

The alleged cause of demurrer is that the petition is insufficient by reason of the assessment, and the several resolutions and ordinances of the city council, in relation to the work, being not made part of the petition.

*C. C. Murdock,*for plaintiff'.

*Clinton Kirby,*for defendant.

Storer, J.

I decide that the petition is sufficient under sec tion 26 of the act providing for the organization of cities, etc., as amended by section 18 of the law of 1853, Swan, 985. The plaintiff will not be permitted to file the ordinances as exhibits, or to embody them in his petition. They are evidence merely, and are not included in the provisions of section 122 of the code. If the defendant wishes to know, before trial, what the evidence is by which the plaintiff proposes to sustain his action, he may obtain it by pursuing the course indicated in section 360 and 361 of the code.

Demurrer overruled.