alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,012
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,865
<PP&E>                                           3,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                     363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       121,242
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,830
<SALES>                                          4,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,200
<CGS>                                              398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,956)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  10,817
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,861
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
# IMMC.EESC-2020-04202-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2020-04202-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

EN

NAT/800

NAT/800

Organic production and date of application

Organic production and date of application

(Category C)

(Category C)

OPINION


  European Economic and Social Committee


  Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2018/848 on organic production as regards its date of application and certain other dates referred to in that Regulation
  [COM(2020) 483 final – 2020/0231 (COD)]

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2018/848 on organic production as regards its date of application and certain other dates referred to in that Regulation
  [COM(2020) 483 final – 2020/0231 (COD)]

Referral

| Referral | European Parliament, 14/09/2020


  Council, 14/09/2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 43(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment |
| Adopted at plenary | 29/10/2020 |
| Plenary session No | 555 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 209/0/9 |

Referral

European Parliament, 14/09/2020

European Parliament, 14/09/2020

Council, 14/09/2020

Council, 14/09/2020

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 43(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 43(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

29/10/2020

29/10/2020

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

555

555

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

209/0/9

209/0/9

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 555th plenary session of 27, 28 and 29 October 2020 (meeting of 29 October 2020), by 209 votes with 9 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 555th plenary session of 27, 28 and 29 October 2020 (meeting of 29 October 2020), by 209 votes with 9 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 29 October 2020

Brussels, 29 October 2020

Christa Schweng

Christa Schweng

President of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report), I, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (a) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (a) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy C. Coxson  
|Timothy C. Coxson      
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 24, 2004
§ 133.11 Certificate required. ( a ) No person subject to this part may conduct rotorcraft external-load operations within the United States without, or in violation of the terms of, a Rotorcraft External-Load Operator Certificate issued by the Administrator under § 133.17.
( b ) No person holding a Rotorcraft External-Load Operator Certificate may conduct rotorcraft external-load operations subject to this part under a business name that is not on that certificate.
[Doc. No. 15176, 42 FR 24198, May 12, 1977, as amended by Amdt. 133-7, 42 FR 32531, June 27, 1977; Amdt. 133-9, 51 FR 40707, Nov. 7, 1986]
Editorial Note on Part 708b
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 708b appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019, and at 85 FR 62213, Oct. 2, 2020.

§ 708b.201 Termination of insurance. ( a ) A state credit union may terminate federal insurance, if permitted by state law, either on its own or by merging into an uninsured credit union.
( b ) A federal credit union may terminate federal insurance only by merging into, or converting its charter to, an uninsured state credit union.
( c ) A majority of the credit union's members must approve a termination of insurance by affirmative vote. The vote must be taken by secret ballot and conducted by an independent entity.
( d ) Termination of federal insurance requires the NCUA's prior written approval. A credit union must notify the NCUA and request approval of the termination through the Regional Director in writing at least 90 days before the proposed termination date and within one year after obtaining the membership vote. The notice to the NCUA must include: ( 1 ) A written statement from the credit union that it “is aware of the requirements of 12 U.S.C. 1831t(b), including all notification and acknowledgment requirements;” and
( 2 ) A certification of the member vote that must include the total number of members of record of the credit union, the number who voted in favor of the termination, and the number who voted against.
( e ) The NCUA will approve or disapprove the termination in writing within 90 days after being notified by the credit union.
[70 FR 3288, Jan. 24, 2005, as amended at 75 FR 81394, Dec. 28, 2010]
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David
Khazak, Chief Financial Officer of Element 21 Golf Company (the "Registrant"),
certify that:





1.   I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;





2.   Based
on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
Report;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly
Report;





4.   The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Quarterly Report is being
prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5.   The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function);





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls;
and





6.   The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this Quarterly
Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.





Date:
      February 12, 2009
            By:
            /s/ David KhazakChief
      Financial Officer
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Richard Rubin, CEO, CFO and
Chairman of Peregrine Industries, Inc, a Florida corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of Peregrine Industries, Inc. and results of its
operations.

Date: October 7, 2010/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)   In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ron Howell, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: August 12, 2016By:\s\ Ron HowellRon HowellInterim Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Hometown  Auto  Retailers,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Corey E. Shaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Corey E. Shaker
---------------------------------------------
Corey E. Shaker
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 22, 2005
#### William BURTON *v.*STATE of Arkansas

5770 & 5771

485 S.W. 2d 750

Opinion delivered October 23, 1972

*313*Givens & Capps,*for appellant.

*Ray Thornton,*Atty. Gen., by: *James A. Neal,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

In case 5770 appellant was convicted of violating Ark. Stat. Anno. § 41-1127 (Repl. 1964) making it unlawful for a person, with lascivious intent, to knowingly and intentionally expose his or her private parts to a person under the age of fourteen years. For reversal appellant contends (1) that the information charged a crime on October 14, 1971, and the evidence indicated the crime, if committed, was on August 7, 1971, and (2) that the State failed to prove lascivious intent.

In case 5771 the trial court revoked a suspended sentence as an aftermath of the first recited incident. Appellant contends that such action was arbitrary.

The evidence for the State consisted of the testimony of a thirteen-year old female and her sister of the age of fifteen years. That testimony indicated that the girls were walking home from Southwest City Mall in Little Rock; that they heard a cough and some leaves rustling; and that they looked in that direction and saw a nude man, standing or sitting by a tree, fondling his privates. The distance between the appellant and the girls was comparable to the length of the courtroom. The girls conceded that the man made no overtures to them.

If appellant was acting in such manner toward the girls as to indicate sexual interest, or if his acts were expressive of lust or lewdness, or if his actions were for *314the purpose of arousing his sexual desire, then, in either eventuality his actions were “lascivious”. *The Random House Dictionary*(1967). The trial court was warranted in finding, from all the circumstances in the case, that lascivious intent was established.

The next point concerns the variation in the dates in the information and the evidence. In the first place we find no objection to have been made at the trial level. Secondly, the corrected date was furnished in a bill of particulars prior to the trial, and that was sufficient. *Inklebarger*v. State, 252 Ark. 953, 481 S.W. 2d 750.

Now as to the revocation of a suspended sentence in case 5771. That case was pending in another court division. At the time of the hearing thereon, appellant had been convicted but had not been sentenced in case 5770. We see no sound reason why the court, in 5771, could not take cognizance of the conviction in 5770 prior to his being sentenced in 5770. Furthermore, no prejudice was shown because the trial court in the indecent exposure case postponed sentence in that case so that the sentence could be made to run concurrently with the sentence in case 5771. Appellant has wholly failed to show a gross abuse of discretion, which is required before this court will disturb a revocation. *Maddox*v. *State,*247 Ark. 553, 446 S.W. 2d 210 (1969).

Affirmed.
§ 125.26 Employment of former FAA employees. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, no certificate holder may knowingly employ or make a contractual arrangement which permits an individual to act as an agent or representative of the certificate holder in any matter before the Federal Aviation Administration if the individual, in the preceding 2 years— ( 1 ) Served as, or was directly responsible for the oversight of, a Flight Standards Service aviation safety inspector; and
( 2 ) Had direct responsibility to inspect, or oversee the inspection of, the operations of the certificate holder.
( b ) For the purpose of this section, an individual shall be considered to be acting as an agent or representative of a certificate holder in a matter before the agency if the individual makes any written or oral communication on behalf of the certificate holder to the agency (or any of its officers or employees) in connection with a particular matter, whether or not involving a specific party and without regard to whether the individual has participated in, or had responsibility for, the particular matter while serving as a Flight Standards Service aviation safety inspector.
( c ) The provisions of this section do not prohibit a certificate holder from knowingly employing or making a contractual arrangement which permits an individual to act as an agent or representative of the certificate holder in any matter before the Federal Aviation Administration if the individual was employed by the certificate holder before October 21, 2011.
[Doc. No. FAA-2008-1154, 76 FR 52235, Aug. 22, 2011]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3771

To extend the date for the submittal of the final report of the National 

Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United States, to provide additional funding for the Commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2004

Mr. FOSSELLA (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. EMANUEL, Mr. 

TANCREDO, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. COOPER, and Mrs. 

MALONEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Select 

Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) 

A BILL

To extend the date for the submittal of the final report 

of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on 

the United States, to provide additional funding for the 

Commission, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NATIONAL COMMISSION ON 

4 TERRORIST ATTACKS ON THE UNITED 

5 STATES. 

6 (a) EXTENSION.—Section 610(b) of the Intelligence 

7 Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–
2

•HR 3771 IH 

1 306; 6 U.S.C. 101 note; 116 Stat 2413) is amended by 

2 striking ‘‘18 months after the date of the enactment of 

3 this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘January 10, 2005’’. 

4 (b) ADDITIONAL FUNDING.—Section 611 of such Act 

5 (6 U.S.C. 101 note; 116 Stat 2413) is amended—

6 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub7 section (c); 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol9 lowing new subsection (b): 

10 ‘‘(b) ADDITIONAL FUNDING FROM THE NATIONAL

11 FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM.—In addition to the 

12 amounts made available to the Commission under sub13 section (a), of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 

14 by the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 

15 (Public Law 108–177) and available in the Department 

16 of Defense Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108–

17 87) for the National Foreign Intelligence Program, not 

18 more than $6,000,000 shall be available for transfer to 

19 the Commission for purposes of the activities of the Com20 mission under this title.’’; and 

21 (3) in subsection (c), as so redesignated by 

22 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and in23 serting ‘‘this section’’.

Æ
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3947 

To amend the provisions relating to the higher education emergency relief 

fund to clarify the flexibility provided to institutions and for students 

under the fund, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2020 

Mr. KAINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the provisions relating to the higher education 

emergency relief fund to clarify the flexibility provided 

to institutions and for students under the fund, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coronavirus Relief 

5 Flexibility for Students and Institutions Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3947 IS

1 SEC. 2. HIGHER EDUCATION RELIEF FUND. 

2 Section 18004 of division B of the Coronavirus Aid, 

3 Relief, and Economic Security Act (Public Law 116–136) 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘deter6 mines have the’’ and inserting ‘‘determines, through 

7 an application process, demonstrate the’’; 

8 (2) in subsection (c)— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘cover any costs associated 

10 with significant changes to the delivery of in11 struction due to the coronavirus’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘defray expenses (including lost revenue, reim13 bursement for expenses already incurred, tech14 nology costs associated with a transition to dis15 tance education, faculty and staff training, and 

16 payroll)’’; 

17 (B) by striking ‘‘Institutions’’ and insert18 ing ‘‘Notwithstanding any provision of the 

19 Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 

20 et seq.), institutions’’; and 

21 (C) by inserting ‘‘, with the eligibility and 

22 selection of the students receiving such grants 

23 being determined solely by each such institu24 tion’’ before the period at the end; and 

25 (3) in subsection (d)(1)— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3947 IS

1 (A) by inserting ‘‘determining grant recipi2 ents and’’ after ‘‘In’’; and 

3 (B) by inserting ‘‘, by application under 

4 such section 18004(a)(3),’’ after ‘‘dem5 onstrates’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS