Materials Characterization Paper 

In Support of the 

Final Rulemaking: 

Identification of Nonhazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste 

Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels

February 3, 2011 

===================================================================== 

1. Definitions of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

In this context, we are defining animal manure as the excrement of livestock reared in 

agricultural operations as well as straw, sawdust, and other residues used as animal bedding. 

Gaseous fuels may be derived from municipal and industrial landfills (landfill gas) or from 

animal manure and solid biomass such as crop silage or the organic fraction of MSW (biogas). 

Both landfill gas and biogas are generated via anaerobic digestion, a multi-stage process whereby 

bacteria convert carbohydrates, fats, and proteins to methane (Evans 2001). EPA does not 

consider these materials to be wastes in themselves, when used as fuel, but rather materials 

derived from wastes. 

2. Annual Quantities of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels Generated and Used 

(1) Sectors that Generate Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels: 

• NAICS 1121: Cattle Ranching and Farming 

• NAICS 1122: Hog and Pig Farming 

• NAICS 1123: Poultry and Egg Production 

• NAICS 1124: Sheep and Goat Farming 

• NAICS 112920: Horses and Other Equine Production 

• NAICS 562212: Solid Waste Landfill 

• NAICS 221320: Sewage Treatment Facilities 

(2) Quantities and Prices of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels Generated: 

• Domestic livestock production generates over a billion tons of manure annually. 

If all of this were used to produce biogas, it would yield approximately 19.4 

million tons of methane (Cuéllar and Webber 2008).1

• Anaerobic digestion of current manure production managed in ponds, anaerobic 

lagoons, and holding tanks would yield 2.4 million tons of methane. Current 

production is 0.07 million tons from 111 operating digesters (EPA 2008a). 

• Around 35 million dry tons of current manure production could be used for 

bioenergy purposes once sustainability concerns are met (e.g., this manure is 

 1

 Biomass production estimates are presented on an annual basis. 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

2

available after primary use of manure on soils to maintain fertility) (Perlack et al. 

2005). 

• In 2006, 11.4 million tons of landfill gas (3.0 million tons of methane) provided 

the equivalent of 150 trillion Btus for heat and electicity generation (EIA 2008). 

• Current landfill gas production from 455 operational projects is 3.6 million tons 

of methane (EPA 2008b). 

• A 2007 survey of anaerobic digestion systems at livestock facilities found an 

average biogas production cost of $6.60 per million btu (NRCS 2007). 

• Poultry litter sold for electricity generation at the Fibrominn LLC plant in Benson, 

MN, is purchased by contract with farmers at $3 to $5 per ton. The power helps 

meet a Minnesota legislative mandate for power generation from biomass, 

although it is not competitive with fossil fuels (Karnowski 2007). 

(3) Trends in Generation of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels:

• Livestock production has become increasingly concentrated in recent years 

(Kellogg et al. 2000). This facilitates the collection of secondary materials for 

bioenergy purposes. 

• Opportunities for utilizing animal byproducts for bioenergy production may 

increase in coming years with higher fossil fuel prices and improved conversion 

technologies including both biochemical and thermochemical platforms (Cantrell 

et al. 2008). 

3. Uses of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

(1) Combustion Uses of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels: 

• Biogas produced on farms is typically used to heat water for purposes of cleaning 

and sanitizing milking pipelines and equipment in dairy operations (NRCS 2007). 

Note that this biogas is derived from animal products, and is not an animal 

product itself. 

• An emerging market for animal manure is direct production of heat and power 

(e.g., the 55 megawatt Fibrominn LLC plant). 

• In 2006, landfill gas was used by the following sectors (energy basis): commercial 

(2.7 percent), industrial (49.3 percent), electric utilities (5.3 percent), and 

independent power producers (42.7 percent) (EIA 2008). 

• The combustor survey database developed by EPA for the 2009 proposal of the 

Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator (CISWI) standards and the 

Industrial Boilers Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards 

includes one combustion unit that reported using approximately 416,000 tons of 

manure as fuel (EPA 2009).2,3 The information in the database also indicates that 

 2

 Although we report mature quantities from the combustion database as a tonnage, the database includes 

material quantities expressed in terms of heating values (Btu). To express this information as a tonnage, we 

assumed that manure has a heating value of 6,187 Btu per pound, which is the thermal value for chicken litter 

reported by Wright (Wright et al. 2006). 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

3

units affected by these standards annually combust approximately 193,000 tons of 

biogas and 3.4 million tons of material described in general terms as biomass or 

bio-liquids.4

 

(2) Non-Combustion Uses of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels:

• Animal manure is spread on cropland and pastureland as a fertilizer to replenish 

nutrients and as a soil treatment to improve soil quality by enhancing soil 

structure and increasing the soil’s ability to hold water and resist compaction 

(Kellogg et al. 2000). Other uses are uncommon in the US (e.g., home heating, 

cooking, and paper production). 

(3) Quantities of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels Landfilled: 

• The amount of animal manure landfilled has not been identified. 

• An additional 535 candidate landfills have been identified with the potential to 

provide 2.4 million tons of methane (EPA 2008b). Milbrandt (2005) estimated 

total domestic production from landfills and domestic wastewater treatment sites 

at 13.6 and 0.5 million tons of methane, respectively. 

(4) Quantities of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels Stockpiled/Stored:

• Information about quantities of animal manure stockpiled is unknown. While the 

quantity of animal manure undergoing short-term storage is significant, decay 

rates and issues associated with storage (leaks and odor), along with technical 

limitations associated with storage of gases likely place some limits on 

stockpiling activity, particularly because the value of these materials is not likely 

to appreciate as the result of long-term stockpiling. 

 3

 The categories of material in the combustion database that we assume are manure are (1) poultry litter 

and (2) manure. 

4 To convert the total Btu values reported for biogas to a tonnage, we assumed a thermal value of 11,820 

Btu/lb (EIA 2008). To convert the total Btu values reported for general biomass and bio-liquids to tonnages, we 

assumed a thermal value of 6,000 Btu/lb for this material, based on the range of thermal values reported for biomass 

materials in this paper, the food scraps and agricultural residue materials characterization paper, and the materials 

characterization paper for forest derived biomass and pulp and paper residues.
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

4

Exhibit 1: Overview of Generation and Use of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

Commodity 

Annual 

Quantity 

Generated 

Annual Quantity Used 

as Fuel 

Additional 

Annual 

Quantity 

Annual 

Quantity in 

Other Uses 

Total 

Quantity 

Stockpiled as 

of 2008 

Cement 

Kilns Other 

----------- million tons of methane per year -----------

Biogas from 

Agricultural 

Anaerobic 

Digesters 0.07 N/I 0.07 N/I N/I N/I 

Landfill Gas 3.60 N/I 3.60 2.4 – 10.0 N/I N/I 

N/I = not identified 

4. Management and Combustion Processes for Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

(1) Types of Units Using Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels:

• Biogas generated on farms is typically combusted directly in boilers and to a 

lesser extent is burned for space heating (NRCS 2007). 

• Landfill gas is used to generate electricity in internal combustion engines, gas 

turbines, and microturbines. It also has direct use applications in boilers, 

combined heat and power systems, dryers, kilns, and greenhouses (EPA 2008d). 

(2) Sourcing of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels:

• Manure is generated in all livestock operations. Anaerobic digesters for biogas 

production accommodate manure handled as a liquid, slurry, or semi-solid (i.e., 

total solids up to approximately 12 percent) (EPA 2002). 

• Landfill gas forms as a by-product of manure decomposition. 

(3) Processing of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels: 

• Biogas generated on farms is typically combusted on-site with little upgrading 

other than hydrogen sulfide and moisture removal. Carbon dioxide may also be 

removed for applications where high thermal values are needed (NRCS 2007). 

• Landfill gas also needs to undergo minimal upgrading when used in most 

applications (EPA 2000). Substantial upgrading is needed, however, should 

landfill gas be introduced into natural gas distribution networks. Here a series of 

membrane separation processes, molecular sieves, and absorption processes are 

employed (CCTP 2005). 

• Public comments submitted to EPA in response to the Advanced Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) suggest that manure is not typically treated to 

eliminate potentially harmful components before being applied to crop fields or 

stored (Werber 2009). 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

5

(4) State Status of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels: 

• At this stage, we have not identified any states that have specifically granted a 

beneficial use designation for the use of animal manure as fuel, but we have not 

performed an exhaustive investigation of state activities and regulations. For 

example, it is possible that equivalent designations are made by states as part of 

agricultural regulation.5

• As of September 2006, approximately 50 percent of states had renewable fuels 

portfolio standards requiring that varying percentages of power generated within 

the individual states come from alternative fuels (including biomass) by a 

designated future date; several more states have enacted such regulations since 

then (DOE 2006).6

 For instance, in August 2007, North Carolina enacted a law to 

“promote the development or renewable energy...through implementation of a 

renewable energy and energy efficiency portfolio standard (REPS)” (Session Law 

2007-397. This law specifically calls for the following: 

Sec. 62-133.7 (e). Compliance with REPS requirement through 

use of swine waste resources. -- For calendar year 2018 and for 

each calendar year thereafter, at least two-tenths of one percent 

(0.2%) of the total electric power in kilowatt hours sold to retail 

electric customers in the State shall be supplied, or contracted for 

supply in each year, by swine waste. [Interim percentages are 

mandated for 2012 and 2015.] 

Sec 62.133.7(f). Compliance with REPS requirement through use 

of poultry waste resources. -- For calendar year 2014 and for each 

calendar year thereafter, at least 900,000 megawatt hours of the 

total electric power sold to retail electric customers in the State 

shall be supplied, or contracted for supply in each year, by poultry 

waste combined with wood shavings, rice hulls, or other bedding 

material. [Interim megawatt hour values are mandated for 2012 

and 2013.] 

 5

 Although we identified no states with a beneficial use designation for the use of animal manure as a fuel, 

public comments submitted in response to the ANPRM indicate that there are ongoing studies to determine the 

feasibility of using animal waste product, specifically chicken manure or “chicken litter” as a fuel for cement kilns 

(Elliott 2009). 

6 The summary table in the reference does not always specify which types of biomass are included, 

however, some examples specific to animal manure and gaseous fuels include: Maryland specifies “poultry litter 

incineration”; Nevada specifies “biomass (includes...animal waste...)”; and New Mexico specifies “animal waste” in 

the definition of “biomass resources”. Other states use the term “sustainable biomass” which could include animal 

manure/gaseous fuels, while others may include animal manure/gaseous fuels in the generic term “biomass”.
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

6

5. Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels Composition and Impacts 

(1) Composition of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels:

• According to one public comment submitted to EPA in response to the Proposed 

Rule, poultry litter has a heating value ranging from 3,800 to 5,000 Btu/lb, 

averaging between 4,500 and 4,600 Btu/lb (Alabama University and Arkansas 

University, as cited in Dight 2010). In addition, Wright et al. (2006) indicate that 

poultry litter has a high heat value of 6,187 btu/lb. 

• Public comments submitted by the Environmental Integrity Project in response to 

the ANPRM maintain that all concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) 

waste contains heavy metals, halogens, dioxins, and other hazardous compounds 

(Werber 2009). In public comments submitted in response to the Proposed Rule, 

Fibrowatt LLC states that poultry litter samples tested at some of the company’s 

combustion facilities have a mercury content of 0.000000048 lb/MMBtu 

(Walmsley 2010). 

• Exhibit 2 details the nutrient profile results from studies conducted by Oklahoma 

State University’s Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources and 

by Alabama A&M in conjunction with Auburn University. Exhibit 3 provides 

more detailed constituent information for poultry litter. Additional constituent 

data compiled by researchers at North Carolina State University for different 

types of manure are presented in the appendix to this paper.

Exhibit 2: Manure Nutrient Profiles (Percent Concentration)

Type of Manure N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Micronutrients Average 

Moisture

Alabama Study 

Cattle 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.1 0.3 * - 60 - 70

Horse 0.4 0.2 0.3 * * * - 60 - 70

Poultry 

 Broiler Litter 3 3 2 1.8 0.4 0.3 + 20

 Hen-caged layers 1.5 1.3 0.5 6 0.4 0.3 + 70

 Hen-litter 1.8 2.8 1.4 * * * + 37

Sheep 0.6 0.3 0.2 * * * - 60 - 70

Swine 0.6 0.4 0.1 * * * - 60 - 70

Oklahoma Study 

Feedlot Manure 1.20 1.05 1.25 * * * * 38 

Broiler Litter 3.15 3.05 2.5 * * * * 23 

*Present in unknown amount. 

Sources: (Mitchell, 2008), (Zhang)
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

7

Exhibit 3: Poultry Litter Constituent Analysis

Ultimate Analysis 

 

Weight as Received (%) 

Source A1 Source B2 

Moisture 30 37.4 

Ash 11.78 10.83 

Carbon 30.3 24.45 

Hydrogen 3.924 3.19 

Oxygen 3.295 21.25 

Nitrogen 0.1598 2.21 

Sulfur 0.3495 0.31 

Chloride 0.16 0.36 

Sources: 

1

Dight 2010. 

2

Pulford 2010. 

• Biogas from on-farm anaerobic digesters typically contains 60 to 70 percent 

methane and 30 to 40 percent carbon dioxide by volume (NRCS 2007). Landfill 

gas tends to contain between 45 to 55 percent methane and 45 to 55 percent 

carbon dioxide (Messics 2001). Average low heat values of gaseous fuels are 

approximately 19,840 btu/lb for methane, 11,820 for biogas, and 6,500 for landfill 

gas (EIA 2008). Exhibit 4 below provides material profiles of biogas generated 

from several different sources (Naskeo Environment, 2009). 

Exhibit 4: Biogas Materials Profile (Percent Concentration)

Components

Household 

Waste

Wastewater Treatment 

Plants sludge

Agricultural 

Wastes

Biogas from 

Agrifood Industry

CH4 50-60 60-75 60-75 68

CO2 38-34 33-19 33-19 26

N2 5 – 0 1 – 0 1 – 0 -

O2 1 - 0 < 0,5 < 0,5 -

H2O 6 (at 40 ° C) 6 (at 40 ° C) 6 (at 40 ° C) 6 (at 40 ° C)

Total 100 100 100 100

Source: (Naskeo Environnement, 2009) 

(2) Impacts of Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels Use:

• Benefits include 1) energy use of methane, a greenhouse gas, otherwise released 

to the atmosphere (EPA 2008e), 2) displacement of fossil fuels, primarily natural 

gas, and, 3) potential reduction of pollutants harmful to human health (NRC 

2003). 

• Landfill gas emissions vary considerably depending on the composition of the 

waste in the landfill, the efficiency with which gas is captured, and the pollution 

control technologies used in combustion. Combustion of landfill gas for energy 

leads to reductions in greenhouse gases, VOCs, and organic mercury compounds 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

8

relative to uncontrolled emissions from landfills (EPA 2008f). In addition, 

combustion of landfill gas avoids the impacts associated with extraction, 

processing, and transportation of typical primary fuels like natural gas. The 

emissions and upstream impacts associated with natural gas combustion are 

identified in Exhibit 2. 

• Fermentation of pig manure to create biogas has been shown to reduce nitrous 

oxide by 14 grams per ton of manure compared to typical storage and fertilizer 

applications (Nielsen 2002). 

• In addition to the avoided GHG emissions, combustion of biogas as a replacement 

for natural gas avoids the emissions associated with the extraction and processing 

of natural gas. Exhibit 2 lists the emissions from combustion of biogas from a 

typical pig farm and combustion and pre-combustion processing of natural gas at 

a typical industrial boiler in the U.S. in the late 1990s. Note that the emissions of 

many of the criteria pollutants are similar to natural gas combustion, but 

significant reductions are achieved by avoiding the impacts associated with 

extraction and processing of natural gas. 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

9

Exhibit 5: Comparative Emissions of Biogas and Natural Gas Combustion 

Pollutant 

Biogas Natural Gas 

Combustion Combustion Combustion plus Upstream 

----- Lb./MMBtu -----

Criteria Pollutants 

PM2.5 0.003 - - 

PM10 0.003 0.009 0.009 

PM, unspecified - - 0.004 

NOx 0.072 0.301 0.417 

VOCs 0.009 0.009 0.524 

SOx 0.026 0.073 1.985 

CO 0.084 0.058 0.282 

Pb - - 2.72x10-7

Hg - - 7.18x10-8

Greenhouse Gases

CO2 194.5 114.6 129.8 

CH4 0.009 0.003 0.372 

N2O 0.005 - 1.17x10-5

MTCO2E/MMBtu 0.089 0.052 0.062

Sources:

Franklin Associates 1998; Nielson 2002. 

Notes:

“-” signifies data not available; may equal zero. Emissions of biogas reflect combustion 

process only and do not include upstream, downstream, or avoided impacts. 

The emission information presented in this table is derived from Life Cycle Inventory 

(LCI) data, as compiled by Franklin Associates. LCI data identifies and quantifies 

resource inputs, energy requirements, and releases to the air, water, and land for each step 

in the manufacture of a product or process, from the extraction of the raw materials to 

ultimate disposal. The LCI can be used to identify those system components or life cycle 

steps that are the main contributors to environmental burdens such as energy use, solid 

waste, and atmospheric and waterborne emissions. Uncertainty in an LCI is due to the 

cumulative effects of input uncertainties and data variability. 

There are several life cycle inventory databases available in the U.S. and Europe. For this 

paper, we applied the most readily available LCI database that was most consistent with 

the materials and uses examined. These LCI data rely on system boundaries as defined by 

Franklin Associates, as described in the documentation for this database, available at: 

http://www.pre.nl/download/manuals/DatabaseManualFranklinUS98.pdf. 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

10

References 

Barker, James C., Zublena, Joseph P., Walls, F.R. North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension Program 

(January 1994, revised 2001). Animal and Poultry Manure Production & Characterization. Retrieved from 

(http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/programs/extension/manure/awm/program/barker/a&pmp&c/content.htm). 

Cantrell KB, Ducey T, Ro KS, Hunt PG. 2008, Livestock waste-to-bioenergy generation opportunities. Bioresource 

Technol 99: 7941-7953. 

CCTP. 2005, US Climate Change Technology Program: Technology Options for the Near and Long Term 

(http://www.climatetechnology.gov/library/2005/tech-options/tor2005-fullreport.pdf, Washington, DC). 

Cuéllar AD, Webber ME. 2008, Cow power: The energy and emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas. 

Environ Res Lett 3: 1-7. 

Dight, Andre, public comment in response to EPA’s Proposed Rulemaking for Identification of Non-Hazardous 

Materials That Are Solid Waste, EPA docket EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329, submitted on behalf of Biomass 

Heating Solutions, Ltd., August 2010. 

Elliott, Gary, public comment in response to EPA’s Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Identification of 

Non-Hazardous Materials That Are Solid Waste, EPA docket EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329, submitted on 

behalf of Lafarge North America, Inc., February 2, 2009. 

Evans G. 2001, Biowaste and Biological Waste Treatment. Earthscan, 216 pp. 

Franklin Associates. 1998, “Franklin US LCI 98 Library.” 

Karnowski S. 2007, Turkey Waste Will Power Electric Plant. USA Today, May 23, 2007. 

Kellogg RL, Lander CH, Moffitt DC, Gollehon N. 2000, Manure Nutrients Relative to the Capacity of Cropland 

and Pastureland to Assimilate Nutrients: Spatial and Temporal Trends for the United States (Pub. No. 

nps00-0579, Economic Research Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, US Dept. of 

Agriculture, Washington, DC). 

Messics MC. 2001, Landfill Gas to Energy (Waste Management, Presentation to Natural Gas/Renewable Energy 

Hybrids Workshop, August 7, 2001). 

Milbrandt A. 2005, A Geographic Perspective on the Current Biomass Resource Availability in the United States

(NREL/TP-560-39181, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO). 

Mitchell, Charles C. Alabama Cooperative Extension Program, Auburn University. (2008). Nutrient content of 

fertilizer materials (ANR-174). Retrieved from http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/A/ANR-0174/ANR0174.pdf

Naskeo Environnement. (2009). Biogas composition. Retrieved from http://www.biogas-renewableenergy.info/biogas_composition.html 

Nielsen, Per H., Anne Merete Nielsen, and Rikke H. Frederiksen. 2002, “Heat and power production from pig 

manure,” as viewed at http://www.lcafood.dk/processes/energyconversion/heatandpowerfrommanure.htm

on September 3, 2008. 

National Research Council (NRC). 2003, Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations: Current Knowledge, 

Future Needs (Ad Hoc Committee on Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations, Committee on 

Animal Nutrition, National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington, DC). 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

11

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2007, An Analysis of Energy Production Costs from Anaerobic 

Digestion Systems on US Livestock Production Facilities (Technical Note No. 1, Natural Resources 

Conservation Service, US Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC). 

Perlack RL, et al. 2005, Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility 

of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply (ORNL/TM-2005/66, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN). 

Pulford, Gary, public comment in response to EPA’s Proposed Rulemaking for Identification of Non-Hazardous 

Materials That Are Solid Waste, EPA docket EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329, submitted on behalf of 

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, July 29, 2010. 

United States Department of Energy (DOE). 2006, Biomass Energy Data Book: Edition 1, Oak Ridge National 

Laboratory, USDOA, ORNL/TM-2006-571, Table 3.16 (US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN) 

United States Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2008, Renewable Energy Annual, 2006 (Energy 

Information Administration, US Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC). 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2000, 3.1 – Stationary Gas Turbines in AP 42, Fifth Edition, 

Volume I (US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC). 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2002, Managing Manure with Biogas Recovery Systems: 

Improved Performance at Competitive Costs (EPA-430-F-02-004, Office of Air and Radiation, US 

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC). 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008a, AgSTAR Accomplishments

(http://www.epa.gov/agstar/accomplish.html, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC). 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008b, Landfill Gas Energy Projects and Candidate 

Landfills (http://www.epa.gov/lmop/docs/map.pdf, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, 

DC). 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008c, Operational LFG Energy Projects, Sorted by State 

and Landfill Name (http://www.epa.gov/lmop/proj/xls/opprjslmopdata.xls, US Environmental Protection 

Agency, Washington, DC). 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008d, Overview of Landfill Gas Energy in the United 

States (June Update, Landfill Methane Outreach Program (LMOP), US Environmental Protection Agency, 

Washington, DC). 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008e, Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and 

Sinks (USEPA #430-R-08-005, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC). 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008f, “Frequently Asked Questions About Landfill Gas 

and How It Affects Public Health, Safety, and the Environment,” as viewed at 

http://www.epa.gov/lmop/faq-3.htm on September 3, 2008. 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2009, Combustor survey database in support of the 2009 

proposal of the Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator (CISWI) standards and the Industrial 

Boilers Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards, April 2009. 

Walmsley, Terry, public comment in response to EPA’s Proposed Rulemaking for Identification of Non-Hazardous 

Materials That Are Solid Waste, EPA docket EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329, submitted on behalf of 

Fibrowatt, LLC, August 3, 2010. 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

12

Werber, Jessica, Hannah Connor, Danielle Diamond, public comment in response to EPA’s Advanced Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking for Identification of Non-Hazardous Materials That Are Solid Waste, EPA docket 

EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329, submitted on behalf of the Environmental Integrity Project, February 2, 2009. 

Wright L, Boundy B, Perlack B, Davis S, Saulsbury B. 2006, Biomass Energy Data Book: Edition 1 (ORNL/TM2006/571, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN). 

Zhang, Hailin. Oklahoma State University, Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 

(n.d.). Fertilizer nutrients in animal manure (PSS-2228). Retrieved from 

http://www.poultrywaste.okstate.edu/files/PSS-2228.pdf
13 

APPENDIX 

Constituent Composition of Various Manure Types 

Fresh Dairy Manure 

Constituents Units Median Mean 

 Total solids (dry matter) (TS) ppm 

 

130,000 

 

140,000 

 Total organic carbon (TOC) ppm 

 

40,000 

 

31,277 

 Inorganic carbon (IOC) ppm - - 

 Total phosphorus (as P) (TP) ppm - - 

 Total phosphate (as P2O5) 

(P2O5) ppm 

 

2,400 

 

2,550 

 Potassium (as K) (K) ppm - - 

 Potash (as K2O) (K2O) ppm 4,100 4,100 

 Arsenic (As) ppm - - 

 Calcium (Ca) ppm 

 

1,800 

 

1,950 

 Chloride (Cl) ppm 

 

1,350 

 

1,450 

 Mercury (Hg) ppm - - 

 Magnesium (Mg) ppm 

 

850 

 

850 

 Lead (Pb) ppm - 0.265 

 Sulfur (S) ppm 

 

600 

 

600 

 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (as N) 

(TKN) ppm 

 

5,000 

 

5,000 

 Total aerobic bacteria (Aer) col/100 gm 

 

8,000,000,000 

 

8,000,000,000 

 Total anaerobic bacteria (Anaer) col/100 gm 

 

6,000,000,000 

 

6,000,000,000 

 Enterococcus bacteria (EC) col/100 gm 

 

16,000,000 

 

16,000,000 

 Escherichia Coliform bacteria 

(Ecoli) col/100 gm - - 

 Facultative bacteria (Fac) col/100 gm - - 

 Fecal coliform bacteria (FC) col/100 gm 

 

46,300,000 

 

188,000,000 

 Fecal streptococcus bacteria 

(FS) col/100 gm 

 

295,000,000 

 

1,200,000,000 

 Salmonella bacteria (Salm) col/100 gm 

 

33,000 

 

33,000 

 Streptococcus bacteria (SC) col/100 gm 

 

10,000,000 

 

1,540,000,000 

 Total bacteria (TB) col/100 gm - - 

 Total coliform bacteria (TC) col/100 gm 

 

45,000,000 

 

276,000,000 

Barker, et al. (2001) 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

14

Fresh Beef Manure 

Constituents Units Median Mean 

 Total solids (dry matter) (TS) ppm 

 

150,000 

 

150,000 

 Total organic carbon (TOC) ppm 

 

58,200 

 

59,899 

 Inorganic carbon (IOC) ppm - - 

 Total phosphorus (as P) (TP) ppm - - 

 Total phosphate (as P2O5) 

(P2O5) ppm 

 

3,550 

 

3,650 

 Potassium (as K) (K) ppm - - 

 Potash (as K2O) (K2O) ppm 

 

4,400 

 

4,450 

 Arsenic (As) ppm - - 

 Calcium (Ca) ppm 

 

1,650 

 

2,200 

 Chloride (Cl) ppm - 

 

1,950 

 Mercury (Hg) ppm - - 

 Magnesium (Mg) ppm 

 

850 

 

850 

 Lead (Pb) ppm - 

 

0 

 Sulfur (S) ppm 

 

800 

 

750 

 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (as N) 

(TKN) ppm 

 

5,500 

 

6,000 

 Total aerobic bacteria (Aer) col/100 gm - - 

 Total anaerobic bacteria (Anaer) col/100 gm 

 

24,000,000,000 

 

24,000,000,000 

 Enterococcus bacteria (EC) col/100 gm 

 

423,000,000 

 

489,000,000 

 Escherichia Coliform bacteria 

(Ecoli) col/100 gm 

 

295,000,000,000 

 

295,000,000,000 

 Facultative bacteria (Fac) col/100 gm - - 

 Fecal coliform bacteria (FC) col/100 gm 

 

270,000,000 

 

483,000,000 

 Fecal streptococcus bacteria 

(FS) col/100 gm 

 

130,000,000 

 

543,000,000 

 Salmonella bacteria (Salm) col/100 gm - - 

 Streptococcus bacteria (SC) col/100 gm - - 

 Total bacteria (TB) col/100 gm 

 

100,000,000,000 

 

2,220,000,000,000 

 Total coliform bacteria (TC) col/100 gm 

 

790,000,000 

 

1,090,000,000 

Barker, et al. (2001) 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

15

Fresh Swine Manure

Constituent Units Median Mean 

 Total solids (dry matter) (TS) ppm 

 

100,000 

 

100,000 

 Total organic carbon (TOC) ppm 

 

24,800 

 

38,699 

 Inorganic carbon (IOC) ppm 6,045 6,045 

 Total phosphorus (as P) (TP) ppm - - 

 Total phosphate (as P2O5) 

(P2O5) ppm 

 

4,000 

 

4,650 

 Potassium (as K) (K) ppm - - 

 Potash (as K2O) (K2O) ppm 

 

4,450 

 

4,400 

 Arsenic (As) ppm 

 

9 

 

9 

 Calcium (Ca) ppm 

 

2,850 

 

4,050 

 Chloride (Cl) ppm 

 

3,100 

 

3,100 

 Mercury (Hg) ppm - - 

 Magnesium (Mg) ppm 

 

800 

 

900 

 Lead (Pb) ppm 

 

1 

 

1 

 Sulfur (S) ppm 

 

850 

 

900 

 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (as N) 

(TKN) ppm 

 

6,000 

 

6,000 

 Total aerobic bacteria (Aer) col/100 gm - - 

 Total anaerobic bacteria (Anaer) col/100 gm - - 

 Enterococcus bacteria (EC) col/100 gm 

 

695,000,000 

 

695,000,000 

 Escherichia Coliform bacteria 

(Ecoli) col/100 gm 

 

10,000,000 

 

10,000,000 

 Facultative bacteria (Fac) col/100 gm - - 

 Fecal coliform bacteria (FC) col/100 gm 

 

330,000,000 

 

246,000,000 

 Fecal streptococcus bacteria 

(FS) col/100 gm 

 

8,400,000,000 

 

6,390,000,000 

 Salmonella bacteria (Salm) col/100 gm - - 

 Streptococcus bacteria (SC) col/100 gm 

 

44,000,000 

 

44,000,000 

 Total bacteria (TB) col/100 gm - - 

 Total coliform bacteria (TC) col/100 gm - - 

Barker, et al. (2001) 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

16

Fresh Turkey Manure 

Constituent Units Median Mean 

 Total solids (dry matter) (TS) ppm 

 

250,000 

 

250,000 

 Total organic carbon (TOC) ppm - - 

 Inorganic carbon (IOC) ppm - - 

 Total phosphorus (as P) (TP) ppm - - 

 Total phosphate (as P2O5) 

(P2O5) ppm 

 

11,000 

 

12,000 

 Potassium (as K) (K) ppm - - 

 Potash (as K2O) (K2O) ppm 

 

6,000 

 

6,000 

 Arsenic (As) ppm - - 

 Calcium (Ca) ppm 

 

12,000 

 

13,500 

 Chloride (Cl) ppm - 

 

10,000 

 Mercury (Hg) ppm - - 

 Magnesium (Mg) ppm 

 

1,500 

 

1,550 

 Lead (Pb) ppm - 

 

12 

 Sulfur (S) ppm - 

 

1,550 

 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (as N) 

(TKN) ppm 

 

13,500 

 

14,000 

 Total aerobic bacteria (Aer) col/100 gm - - 

 Total anaerobic bacteria (Anaer) col/100 gm - - 

 Enterococcus bacteria (EC) col/100 gm - - 

 Escherichia Coliform bacteria 

(Ecoli) col/100 gm - - 

 Facultative bacteria (Fac) col/100 gm - - 

 Fecal coliform bacteria (FC) col/100 gm 

 

29,000,000 

 

29,000,000 

 Fecal streptococcus bacteria (FS) col/100 gm - - 

 Salmonella bacteria (Salm) col/100 gm - - 

 Streptococcus bacteria (SC) col/100 gm - - 

 Total bacteria (TB) col/100 gm - - 

 Total coliform bacteria (TC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

Barker, et al. (2001) 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

17

Fresh Sheep Manure 

Constituent Units Median Mean 

 Total solids (dry matter) (TS) ppm 

 

260,000 

 

280,000 

 Total organic carbon (TOC) ppm 

 

35,490 

 

35,490 

 Inorganic carbon (IOC) ppm - - 

 Total phosphorus (as P) (TP) ppm - - 

 Total phosphate (as P2O5) (P2O5) ppm 

 

4,600 

 

4,700 

 Potassium (as K) (K) ppm - - 

 Potash (as K2O) (K2O) ppm 

 

9,500 

 

9,500 

 Arsenic (As) ppm - - 

 Calcium (Ca) ppm 

 

6,000 

 

6,000 

 Chloride (Cl) ppm 

 

2,250 

 

2,250 

 Mercury (Hg) ppm - - 

 Magnesium (Mg) ppm 

 

1,300 

 

1,400 

 Lead (Pb) ppm 

 

2 

 

2 

 Sulfur (S) ppm 

 

900 

 

900 

 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (as N) 

(TKN) ppm 

 

10,000 

 

10,500 

 Total aerobic bacteria (Aer) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total anaerobic bacteria (Anaer) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Enterococcus bacteria (EC) 

 col/100 

gm 

 

502,000,000 

 

502,000,000 

 Escherichia Coliform bacteria 

(Ecoli) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Facultative bacteria (Fac) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Fecal coliform bacteria (FC) 

 col/100 

gm 

 

1,600,000,000 

 

1,120,000,000 

 Fecal streptococcus bacteria (FS) 

 col/100 

gm 

 

91,000,000 

 

1,560,000,000 

 Salmonella bacteria (Salm) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Streptococcus bacteria (SC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total bacteria (TB) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total coliform bacteria (TC) 

 col/100 

gm 

 

173,000,000 

 

498,000,000 

Barker, et al. (2001) 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

18

Fresh Goat Manure 

Constituent Units Median Mean 

 Total solids (dry matter) (TS) ppm 330,000 330,000 

 Total organic carbon (TOC) ppm - - 

 Inorganic carbon (IOC) ppm - - 

 Total phosphorus (as P) (TP) ppm - - 

 Total phosphate (as P2O5) (P2O5) ppm 6,000 6,000 

 Potassium (as K) (K) ppm - - 

 Potash (as K2O) (K2O) ppm 12,000 12,000 

 Arsenic (As) ppm - - 

 Calcium (Ca) ppm - 6,500 

 Chloride (Cl) ppm - 2,600 

 Mercury (Hg) ppm - - 

 Magnesium (Mg) ppm - 1,600 

 Lead (Pb) ppm - 2 

 Sulfur (S) ppm - 1,050 

 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (as N) 

(TKN) ppm 11,000 11,000 

 Total aerobic bacteria (Aer) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total anaerobic bacteria (Anaer) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Enterococcus bacteria (EC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Escherichia Coliform bacteria 

(Ecoli) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Facultative bacteria (Fac) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Fecal coliform bacteria (FC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Fecal streptococcus bacteria (FS) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Salmonella bacteria (Salm) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Streptococcus bacteria (SC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total bacteria (TB) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total coliform bacteria (TC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

Barker, et al. (2001) 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

19

Fresh Horse Manure 

Constituent Units Median Mean 

 Total solids (dry matter) (TS) ppm 

 

260,000 

 

300,000 

 Total organic carbon (TOC) ppm - - 

 Inorganic carbon (IOC) ppm - - 

 Total phosphorus (as P) (TP) ppm - - 

 Total phosphate (as P2O5) (P2O5) ppm 

 

2,700 

 

3,150 

 Potassium (as K) (K) ppm - - 

 Potash (as K2O) (K2O) ppm 

 

5,500 

 

6,000 

 Arsenic (As) ppm - - 

 Calcium (Ca) ppm 

 

5,500 

 

5,500 

 Chloride (Cl) ppm - 

 

3,150 

 Mercury (Hg) ppm - - 

 Magnesium (Mg) ppm 

 

1,250 

 

1,100 

 Lead (Pb) ppm - 

 

9 

 Sulfur (S) ppm 

 

700 

 

850 

 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (as N) 

(TKN) ppm 

 

6,000 

 

6,000 

 Total aerobic bacteria (Aer) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total anaerobic bacteria (Anaer) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Enterococcus bacteria (EC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Escherichia Coliform bacteria 

(Ecoli) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Facultative bacteria (Fac) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Fecal coliform bacteria (FC) 

 col/100 

gm 

 

1,830,000 

 

1,830,000 

 Fecal streptococcus bacteria (FS) 

 col/100 

gm 

 

1,150,000,000 

 

630,000,000 

 Salmonella bacteria (Salm) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Streptococcus bacteria (SC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total bacteria (TB) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total coliform bacteria (TC) 

 col/100 

gm 

 

9,760,000,000 

 

9,760,000,000 

Barker, et al. (2001) 
Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels 

20

Game Bird Manure 

Constituent Units Median Mean 

 Total solids (dry matter) (TS) ppm - 790,000 

 Total organic carbon (TOC) ppm - - 

 Inorganic carbon (IOC) ppm - - 

 Total phosphorus (as P) (TP) ppm - - 

 Total phosphate (as P2O5) (P2O5) ppm - 34,500 

 Potassium (as K) (K) ppm - - 

 Potash (as K2O) (K2O) ppm - 23,500 

 Arsenic (As) ppm - - 

 Calcium (Ca) ppm - - 

 Chloride (Cl) ppm - - 

 Mercury (Hg) ppm - - 

 Magnesium (Mg) ppm - - 

 Lead (Pb) ppm - - 

 Sulfur (S) ppm - - 

 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (as N) 

(TKN) ppm - 35,500 

 Total aerobic bacteria (Aer) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total anaerobic bacteria (Anaer) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Enterococcus bacteria (EC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Escherichia Coliform bacteria 

(Ecoli) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Facultative bacteria (Fac) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Fecal coliform bacteria (FC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Fecal streptococcus bacteria (FS) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Salmonella bacteria (Salm) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Streptococcus bacteria (SC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total bacteria (TB) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

 Total coliform bacteria (TC) 

 col/100 

gm - - 

Note: Values for Game Bird Manure are estimates only. 

Barker, et al. (2001)