alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50317

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JOHNNY TORRES,

 Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(A-93-CR-36-1)

_________________________________________________________________

February 8, 1996

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny Torres appeals the district court's denial of his 

motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In his § 2255 motion,

Torres challenged the quantity of drugs used to establish his

base offense level and the validity of his waiver of his right to

appeal his sentence. Torres also alleged that his attorney

provided ineffective assistance of counsel because he allowed 

Torres to waive his appellate rights, and he failed to contest

the quantity of drugs used to calculate Torres's sentence.
2

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the

district court's denial of Torres's § 2255 motion.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BHUPINDER SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70872

Agency No. A094-998-685

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Bhupinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

FILED

JUL 23 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70872

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings,

applying the new standards governing adverse credibility determinations created

by the Real ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010).

Substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility determination based on

the discrepancy in Singh’s testimony regarding whether he had any party

membership documents. See id. at 1040 (the IJ may rely on “any relevant factor”

to determine an applicant’s credibility). The agency reasonably rejected Singh’s

explanation regarding the documents as insufficient. See Rivera v. Mukasey, 508

F.3d 1271, 1275 (9th Cir. 2008). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s

adverse credibility determination based on the inconsistency between Singh’s

testimony and his statement to the asylum officer regarding when he joined Akali

Dal Badl, and the omission from Singh’s direct testimony, asylum application, and

supporting documents of his claim that the police took documents from his home

when they raided it in November 2005. See Pal v. INS, 204 F.3d 935, 938 (9th Cir.

2000); Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1040. Accordingly, Singh’s asylum claim fails.

Because Singh failed to meet the lower burden of proof for asylum, it

follows that he has not met the higher standard for withholding of removal. See

See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 
3 09-70872

Finally, because Singh’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony the

agency found not credible, and he points to no other evidence showing it is more

likely than not he will be tortured if returned to India, his CAT claim also fails. 

See id. at 1156-57; Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1048-49.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# Official Journal C 478/21 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 478 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5921 December 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 478

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5921 December 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 478/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 35th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 478/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 35th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 133.35 Carriage of persons. ( a ) No certificate holder may allow a person to be carried during rotorcraft external-load operations unless that person— ( 1 ) Is a flight crewmember;
( 2 ) Is a flight crewmember trainee;
( 3 ) Performs an essential function in connection with the external-load operation; or
( 4 ) Is necessary to accomplish the work activity directly associated with that operation.
( b ) The pilot in command shall ensure that all persons are briefed before takeoff on all pertinent procedures to be followed (including normal, abnormal, and emergency procedures) and equipment to be used during the external-load operation.
[Doc. No. 24550, 51 FR 40708, Nov. 7, 1986]
#### § 308.138 Scope.

The rules and procedures of this subpart J shall apply to proceedings by the Board of Directors or its designee to exempt, in whole or in part, an issuer of securities from the provisions of sections 12(g), 13, 14(a), 14(c), 14(d), or 14(f) of the Exchange Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 781, 78m, 78n (a), (c) (d) or (f)), or to exempt an officer or a director or beneficial owner of securities of such an issuer from the provisions of section 16 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78p).
§ 135.399 Small nontransport category airplane performance operating limitations. ( a ) No person may operate a reciprocating engine or turbopropeller-powered small airplane that is certificated under § 135.169(b) (2), (3), (4), (5), or (6) unless that person complies with the takeoff weight limitations in the approved Airplane Flight Manual or equivalent for operations under this part, and, if the airplane is certificated under § 135.169(b) (4) or (5) with the landing weight limitations in the Approved Airplane Flight Manual or equivalent for operations under this part.
( b ) No person may operate an airplane that is certificated under § 135.169(b)(6) unless that person complies with the landing limitations prescribed in §§ 135.385 and 135.387 of this part. For purposes of this paragraph, §§ 135.385 and 135.387 are applicable to reciprocating and turbopropeller-powered small airplanes notwithstanding their stated applicability to turbine engine powered large transport category airplanes.
[44 FR 53731, Sept. 17, 1979]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR 

THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

IN RE: 

 CASE NO. 12-10113 ESL 

EMPRESAS OMAJEDE INC Chapter 11 

 

XXX-XX9044 

FILED & ENTERED ON 03/11/2013

Debtor(s) 

ORDER 

 The motion filed by Debtor requesting entry of order Directing the 

Department of the Treasury of Puerto Rico to Deposit Rent Payments in Debtor-inPossession Account (docket #37) is hereby granted. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 11 day of March, 2013. 

Enrique S. Lamoutte Inclan 

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge 

 

CC: DEBTOR(S) 

 PATRICIA I VARELA 

 DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY PR 

 

Case:12-10113-ESL11 Doc#:41 Filed:03/11/13 Entered:03/11/13 13:17:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24819-11 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 15:46:48 Desc:

Exhibit 11 - Dkt. 41 of 12-10113 Page 1 of 1
#### ERNEST WHITWORTH MARLAND v. UNITED STATES

*[Ante,*p. 69;

290 U.S. 658]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court October 9, 1933.
§ 13.77 Consent order of compliance. ( a ) At any time before the issuance of an order of compliance, an agency attorney and the alleged violator may agree to dispose of the case by the issuance of a consent order of compliance.
( b ) The alleged violator may submit a proposed consent order to an agency attorney. The proposed consent order must include— ( 1 ) An admission of all jurisdictional facts;
( 2 ) An express waiver of the right to further procedural steps and of all rights to legal review in any forum;
( 3 ) An express waiver of attorney's fees and costs;
( 4 ) If a notice has been issued prior to the proposed consent order of compliance, an incorporation by reference of the notice and an acknowledgement that the notice may be used to construe the terms of the consent order of compliance; and
( 5 ) If a request for hearing is pending in any forum, a provision that the alleged violator will withdraw the request for a hearing and request that the case be dismissed.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Virtual Crypto Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2018 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Gadi Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/
    Gadi Levin          | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Gadi
    Levin              | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer | 



Dated:
July 31, 2018



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

I, Wes Tate, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of HST Global, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ending June 30, 2008;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Company and have:

          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
     an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
the Company's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
     control over financial reporting.

                                   Date: August 14, 2008

                                   \s\ Wesley D. Tate
                                   ------------------
                                   Wesley D. Tate
                                   Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3765 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand tax benefits related 

to dependent care assistance programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2020 

Mrs. LOEFFLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

tax benefits related to dependent care assistance programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Working Families 

5 Childcare Access (WFCA) Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF BENEFITS FOR DEPENDENT CARE 

7 ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS. 

8 (a) EXPANSION OF ANNUAL MAXIMUM.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of Section 

10 129(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3765 IS

1 amended by striking ‘‘$5,000 ($2,500’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$15,000 ($7,500,’’. 

3 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

4 by paragraph (1) shall apply to taxable years begin5 ning after December 31, 2020. 

6 (b) CARRYFORWARD OF UNUSED BENEFITS UNDER

7 CAFETERIA PLANS.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 125(d)(2) of the In9 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

11 ‘‘(E) CARRYFORWARD OF UNUSED BENE12 FITS UNDER DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE

13 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS.— 

14 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding 

15 subparagraph (A), a plan or arrangement 

16 may permit a participant in a dependent 

17 care assistance flexible spending arrange18 ment to elect to carry forward any aggre19 gate unused balances in the participant’s 

20 accounts under such arrangement as of the 

21 close of any year to the succeeding year. 

22 Such carryforward shall be treated as hav23 ing occurred within 30 days of the close of 

24 the year. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3765 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) LIMITATION.—The amount 

2 which a participant may elect to carry for3 ward under clause (i) from any year shall 

4 be any aggregate unused balances in the 

5 participant’s account at the close of any 

6 year. 

7 ‘‘(iii) EXCLUSION FROM GROSS IN8 COME.—No amount shall be included in 

9 gross income under this chapter by reason 

10 of any carry forward under this subpara11 graph. 

12 ‘‘(iv) COORDINATION LIMITS.—The 

13 maximum amount which may be contrib14 uted to a dependent care assistance flexible 

15 spending arrangement for any year to 

16 which an unused amount is carried under 

17 this subparagraph shall not be reduced by 

18 such unused amount.’’. 

19 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

20 by this subsection shall take effect on the date of the 

21 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                               JO-ANN STORES, INC.

                  LIST OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO PARTICIPATE IN
         THE REGISTRANT'S 1979 SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN, AS AMENDED

     -        David Bolen
     -        Brian Carney
     -        Rosalind Thompson
     -        Mike Edwards
Exhibit 32

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer (CEO) and the Principal
Financial Officer (Chief Operating Officer) of Millenia Hope Inc. (the
"Company"), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

         (a)      The Annual Report on Form 10-K SB of the Company for the year
                  ended November 30, 2007, filed on the date hereof with the
                  Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: March 24, 2008



                                                     /s/ Leonard Stella
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                     Leonard Stella
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 24, 2008

                                                     /s/ Yehuda Kops
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                     Yehuda Kops
                                                     Chief Operating Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
§ 158.17 Project eligibility at PFC levels of $4 or $4.50. ( a ) A project for any airport is eligible for PFC funding at levels of $4 or $4.50 if— ( 1 ) The project meets the eligibility requirements of § 158.15;
( 2 ) The project costs requested for collection at $4 or $4.50 cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available for the programs referred to in 49 U.S.C. 48103; and
( 3 ) In the case of a surface transportation or terminal project, the public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates.
( b ) In addition, a project for a medium or large airport is only eligible for PFC funding at levels of $4 or $4.50 if the project will make a significant contribution to improving air safety and security, increasing competition among air carriers, reducing current or anticipated congestion, or reducing the impact of aviation noise on people living near the airport.
[Doc. No. FAA-2000-7402, 65 FR 34541, May 30, 2000]
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:

      -     the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
            and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
            and

      -     the information contained in the report fairly presents, on all
            material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
            operations.

/s/ John J. Remaley
John J. Remaley, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 11, 2004

                                       28
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8636]

[[Page 21619]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7814]

Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Committee Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) will conduct an open 
meeting at 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, April 25, 2012, in Room 2501 of the 
United States Coast Guard Headquarters Building, 2100 Second Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20593-7126. The primary purpose of the meeting is 
to prepare for the 90th Session of the International Maritime 
Organization's (IMO) Marine Safety Committee to be held at the IMO 
Headquarters, London, England, United Kingdom, May 16-25, 2012.
    The primary matters to be considered include:

    Consideration and adoption of amendments to mandatory 
instruments;
    Measures to enhance maritime security;
    Goal-based new ship construction standards;
    LRIT-related matters;
    Flag State implementation;
    Radiocommunications and search and rescue;
    Ship design and equipment;
    Safety of navigation;
    Fire protection;
    Dangerous goods, solid cargoes and containers;
    Stability, load lines and fishing vessel safety;
    Bulk liquids and gases;
    Implementation of the STCW Convention;
    Technical assistance sub-programme in maritime safety and 
security;
    Capacity-building for the implementation of new measures;
    Role of the human element;
    Formal safety assessment;
    Piracy and armed robbery against ships;
    General cargo ship safety;
    Implementation of instruments and related matters;
    Relations with other organizations;
    Application of the Committee's Guidelines;
    Passenger ship safety.

    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. To facilitate the building security process, and 
to request reasonable accommodation, those who plan to attend should 
contact the meeting coordinator, LCDR Matthew Frazee, by email at 
imo@uscg.mil, by phone at (202) 372-1376, or in writing at Commandant 
(CG-52), U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 2nd Street SW., Stop 7126, Washington, 
DC 20593-7126 not later than April 18, 2012, 7 days prior to the 
meeting. Requests made after April 18, 2012 might not be able to be 
accommodated. Please note that due to security considerations, two 
valid, government issued photo identifications must be presented to 
gain entrance to the Headquarters building. The Headquarters building 
is accessible by taxi and privately owned conveyance (public 
transportation is not generally available). However, parking in the 
vicinity of the building is extremely limited. Additional information 
regarding this and other IMO SHC public meetings may be found at: 
www.uscg.mil/imo.

    Dated: March 29, 2012.
Brian Robinson,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2012-8636 Filed 4-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
```