alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 141.39 Aircraft. ( a ) When the school's training facility is located within the U.S., an applicant for a pilot school certificate or provisional pilot school certificate must show that each aircraft used by the school for flight training and solo flights: ( 1 ) Is a civil aircraft of the United States;
( 2 ) Is certificated with a standard airworthiness certificate, a primary airworthiness certificate, or a special airworthiness certificate in the light-sport category unless the FAA determines otherwise because of the nature of the approved course;
( 3 ) Is maintained and inspected in accordance with the requirements for aircraft operated for hire under part 91, subpart E, of this chapter;
( 4 ) Has two pilot stations with engine-power controls that can be easily reached and operated in a normal manner from both pilot stations (for flight training); and
( 5 ) Is equipped and maintained for IFR operations if used in a course involving IFR en route operations and instrument approaches. For training in the control and precision maneuvering of an aircraft by reference to instruments, the aircraft may be equipped as provided in the approved course of training.
( b ) When the school's training facility is located outside the U.S. and the training will be conducted outside the U.S., an applicant for a pilot school certificate or provisional pilot school certificate must show that each aircraft used by the school for flight training and solo flights: ( 1 ) Is either a civil aircraft of the United States or a civil aircraft of foreign registry;
( 2 ) Is certificated with a standard or primary airworthiness certificate or an equivalent certification from the foreign aviation authority;
( 3 ) Is maintained and inspected in accordance with the requirements for aircraft operated for hire under part 91, subpart E of this chapter, or in accordance with equivalent maintenance and inspection from the foreign aviation authority's requirements;
( 4 ) Has two pilot stations with engine-power controls that can be easily reached and operated in a normal manner from both pilot stations (for flight training); and
( 5 ) Is equipped and maintained for IFR operations if used in a course involving IFR en route operations and instrument approaches. For training in the control and precision maneuvering of an aircraft by reference to instruments, the aircraft may be equipped as provided in the approved course of training.
[Doc. No. FAA-2006-26661, 74 FR 42563, Aug. 21, 2009, as amended by Amdt. 141-13, 75 FR 5223, Feb. 1, 2010]
§ 1261.410 Suspension or revocation of license or eligibility; liquidation of collateral. ( a ) In seeking the collection of statutory penalties, forfeitures, or debts provided for as an enforcement aid or for compelling compliance, NASA will give serious consideration to the suspension or revocation of licenses or other privileges for any inexcusable, prolonged, or repeated failure of a debtor to pay such a claim. In the case of a contractor under 48 CFR chapter 18, NASA will comply with the debarment, suspension, and ineligibility requirements of the NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (NASA/FAR Supplement) at 48 CFR 1809.4. Likewise, in making, guaranteeing, insuring, acquiring, or participating in loans, NASA will give serious consideration to suspending or disqualifying any lender, contractor, broker, borrower, or other debtor from doing further business with it or engaging in programs sponsored by it if such a debtor fails to pay its debts to the Government within a reasonable time. The failure of any surety to honor its obligations in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 9305 must be reported to the Treasury Department at once. Notification that a surety's certificate of authority to do business with the Federal Government has been revoked or forfeited by the Treasury Department will be forwarded by that Department to all interested agencies.
( b ) If NASA is holding security or collateral which may be liquidated and the proceeds applied on debts due it through the exercise of a power of sale in the security instrument or a nonjudicial foreclosure, it should do so by such procedures if the debtor fails to pay the debt within a reasonable time after demand, unless the cost of disposing of the collateral will be disproportionate to its value or special circumstances require judicial foreclosure. NASA will provide the debtor with reasonable notice of the sale, an accounting of any surplus proceeds, and any other procedures required by applicable contract or law. Collection from other sources, including liquidation of security or collateral, is not a prerequisite to requiring payment by a surety or insurance concern unless such action is expressly required by statute or contract.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Zaxis International Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ivo Heiden, President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Ivo Heiden

Ivo HeidenPresident and Chief Financial OfficerDated: August 10, 2006

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zaxis International Inc. and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
§ 129.15 Flightcrew member certificates. Each person acting as a flightcrew member must hold a certificate or license that shows the person's ability to perform duties in connection with the operation of the aircraft. The certificate or license must have been issued or rendered valid by: ( a ) The State in which the aircraft is registered; or
( b ) The State of the Operator, provided that the State of the Operator and the State of Registry have entered into an agreement under Article 83*bis* of the Convention on International Civil Aviation that covers the aircraft.
[Doc. No. FAA-2009-0140; 76 FR 7491, Feb. 10, 2011]
Yellowstone Cutthrout

Trout Suitable Recovery

Habitat within the

Billings Field Office

Planning Area

Map 28

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument Draft RMP / EIS

US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

YCT Suitable Habitat

Counties

Streams

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü Wyoming

0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Map scale 1:900,000

Miles

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

Montana individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

 Wyoming developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.
§ 615.5180 Bank interest rate risk management program. ( a ) The board of directors of each Farm Credit bank must develop, implement, and effectively oversee an interest rate risk management program tailored to the needs of the institution. The program must establish a risk management process that effectively identifies, measures, monitors, and controls interest rate risk. The board of directors of each Farm Credit bank must be knowledgeable of the nature and level of interest rate risk taken by the institution.
( b ) Senior management is responsible for ensuring that interest rate risk is properly managed on both a long-range and a day-to-day basis.
( c ) The board of directors of each Farm Credit bank must adopt an interest rate risk management section of an asset/liability management policy that establishes interest rate risk exposure limits as well as the criteria to determine compliance with these limits. At a minimum, the interest rate risk management section must establish policies and procedures for the bank to: ( 1 ) Address the purpose and objectives of interest rate risk management;
( 2 ) Identify and analyze the causes of risks within its existing balance sheet structure;
( 3 ) Measure the potential effect of these risks on projected earnings and market values by conducting interest rate shock tests and simulations of multiple economic scenarios at least on a quarterly basis and by considering the effect of investments on interest rate risk based on the results of the stress testing required under § 615.5133(h)(4);
( 4 ) Describe and implement actions needed to obtain its desired risk management objectives;
( 5 ) Identify exception parameters and approvals needed for any exceptions to the requirements of the board's policies;
( 6 ) Describe delegations of authority;
( 7 ) Describe reporting requirements, including exceptions to limits contained in the board's policies;
( 8 ) Consider the nature and purpose of derivative contracts and establish counterparty risk thresholds and limits for derivatives.
( d ) At least quarterly, management of each Farm Credit bank must report to its board of directors, or a designated committee of the board, describing the nature and level of interest rate risk exposure. Any deviations from the board's policy on interest rate risk must be specifically identified in the report and approved by the board or designated committee of the board.
[77 FR 66374, Nov. 5, 2012, as amended at 83 FR 27503, June 12, 2018]
Editorial Note on Part 139
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

§ 139.341 Identifying, marking, and lighting construction and other unserviceable areas. ( a ) In a manner authorized by the Administrator, each certificate holder must— ( 1 ) Mark and, if appropriate, light in a manner authorized by the Administrator— ( i ) Each construction area and unserviceable area that is on or adjacent to any movement area or any other area of the airport on which air carrier aircraft may be operated;
( ii ) Each item of construction equipment and each construction roadway, which may affect the safe movement of aircraft on the airport; and
( iii ) Any area adjacent to a NAVAID that, if traversed, could cause derogation of the signal or the failure of the NAVAID; and
( 2 ) Provide procedures, such as a review of all appropriate utility plans prior to construction, for avoiding damage to existing utilities, cables, wires, conduits, pipelines, or other underground facilities.
( b ) FAA Advisory Circulars contain methods and procedures for identifying and marking construction areas that are acceptable to the Administrator.
#### § 13.1 Re-delegation.

Unless otherwise specified, the Chief Counsel, each Deputy Chief Counsel, and the Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement may re-delegate the authority delegated to them under this part.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350


In connection with the Annual Report of Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




August 28, 2002                         By  /s/ Anthony Jurak
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                Anthony Jurak
                                                President, Chief
                                                Executive Officer
                                                and Principal Accounting Officer
§ 1262.104 Eligibility of applicants. ( a ) To be eligible for an award of attorney fees and other expenses, the applicant must be a “party” to the adversary adjudication for which an award is sought. The applicant must show that it meets all conditions of eligibility set out in this subpart and in subpart 1262.2.
( b ) The types of eligible applicants are as follows: ( 1 ) An individual with a net worth of not more than $2 million;
( 2 ) Any owner of an unincorporated business who has a net worth of not more than $7 million, including both personal and business interests, and not more than 500 employees;
( 3 ) A charitable or other tax-exempt organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) with not more than 500 employees;
( 4 ) A cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)) with not more than 500 employees; and
( 5 ) Any other partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or organization with a net worth of not more than $7 million and not more than 500 employees.
( c ) For the purpose of eligibility, the net worth and number of employees of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the proceeding was initiated.
( d ) An applicant who owns an unincorporated business will be considered as an “individual” rather than as a “sole owner of an unincorporated business” if the issues on which the applicant prevails are related primarily to personal interests rather then to business interests.
( e ) The employees of an applicant include all persons who regularly perform services for remuneration for the applicant, under the applicant's direction and control. Part-time employees shall be included on a proportional basis.
( f ) The net worth and number of employees of the applicant and all of its affiliates shall be aggregated to determine eligibility. Any individual, corporation, or other entity that directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares or other interest of the applicant, or any corporation or other entity of which the applicant directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other interest, will be considered an affiliate for purposes of this part, unless the adjudicative officer determines that such treatment would be unjust and contrary to the purposes of the Act in light of the actual relationship between the affiliated entities. In addition, the adjudicative officer may determine that financial relationships of the applicant other than those described in this paragraph constitute special circumstances that would make an award unjust.
( g ) An applicant that participates in a proceeding primarily on behalf of one or more other persons or entities that would be ineligible is not itself eligible for an award.
[51 FR 15311, Apr. 23, 1986, as amended at 60 FR 12668, Mar. 8, 1995]
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3839 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ‘‘Opha May Johnson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3839 ES

1 SECTION 1. OPHA MAY JOHNSON POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2719 South Webster Street in 

4 Kokomo, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Opha May Johnson Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Opha May Johnson 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate November 18, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3839 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ‘‘Opha May Johnson al Service located at 2719 South Webster Street
§ 1203.804 Meetings. ( a ) Meetings will be held at the call of the Chairperson.
( b ) Records produced by the Committee and the minutes of each meeting will be maintained by the Executive Secretary.
[78 FR 5121, Jan. 24, 2013]
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

BULLETIN 1042 PLATE 15

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

EXPLANATION

AMVILUBL ONY

AMVNUBLVND AMVILYSL SNOBIVIEYD

25 g
ae z £3 ky
33 a 33 2s
EB ¢ 36 Ce
E38 : gp £3
82 2 re es
$3 FA 23 gS
gs 22g = 3
Bam 22 8 5 6 8 AE

3182 REE s2, 2 :2 of x8 4& 23
mcd NN EE 2 \ee2 wo rR eof xg 2 2S
3/2 NAGE | 2 /gHE ffs fe GE ag rela
23 RQVEP 235 5 (2 °3 “3 & gS
23 RQY22 ge g °3 ® Ls
z 8 Bes = ° a Be
Fe ce 7 3
ap ep Ee
bE 3 bas g3
23 2 e25 |
32 = Bes 3
58 5 )

auaooyy 90)
‘pun 94900040 eIPPEAT

18°30"

Serpentine
Limestone

Diorite and granite

18°15"

18°00"

yo

=
: 4
3 deg al oy
i: Ia Avg al all
33 TN xf

Playa de
‘Humacao

65°45"

Se

65°45"

66°00

C E AN

0)

4

po

8
RIO PLEDRAS

B
EEK x0
Qo
SA

“Qu

7

Us.
TKu

Aguas Buenas

°

Comer

9

Cayey

Ku

Sone
GUAYAMA

a,

{
\

66°15"

5
Pte
Puerto Nu

4

Berranquitas

°

66°30"

66°45"

67°00"

67°15"

a
x
y
&
x

Pta
Palmas:

c

‘Altes

Los Negritos
x

ESSA
Rs iQX @

FESS NISSEN RRR
PSNR AVV

SSN
N =

ESS
SSAA
ALISA VVANVVVywy
RAY
SERIA

xX.

ROOK

Sk
SS

NAH

a
Si!

Sari
lAeig

Sr

an

te

Pta Cuchara

66°00"

66°15"

66°30"

RSS

SS AQAQA°qinyy
SSQAanry

Vela,
i
ey

G
y
y
gy
Ly
g
Uy
g
Zi

a
ep

Ss A {aw
SSiM{KVX°°aAng
MAYS

D)
Ry
ae
ve
Nesey

2:
er

Marieao
ix
§

Se

SSSV7
SS

C AR\I BBEAN

TO Bo

[-_+-_., :

KKK ox

TRQir
7
ik

BqEN

x\NS

PAINS
xX
ss
eK

ae

fe
2

x
=

PP
Ye

SS
Ti

ee
TTT;
(A.

oe
bi

al
0)
ee:

Be

OE2:

2

MAAN

sis
EON,
Pin

oe
SKS

SOC AEAY,
See

aes
SLES

TKu

‘
eri

aa
San Gi
ss

Cabo Ros

6645"

GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC MAP OF PUERTO RICO SHOWING SHORELINE FEATURES

67°00"

xX

Pta
Higuero,

18°30)
18°15

18°00"

e715"

Geology adapted from Roberts and others, 1942; Zapp,

Base from U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps, scale 1:30,000

Bergquist, and Thomas, 1948; Hess, Mattson, and

25
og
bg
BS

co)
3

40 Kilometers

10.

30 Miles

10.
§ 15.103 Exclusions. A publisher that requests indemnification under this part will not be indemnified if— ( a ) The complaint filed against the publisher, or demand for payment against the publisher, first occurred before December 19, 1985;
( b ) The publisher does not negotiate a good faith settlement;
( c ) The publisher does not conduct a good faith defense;
( d ) The defective or deficient flight procedure or airway— ( 1 ) Was not promulgated by the FAA;
( 2 ) Was not accurately depicted on the publisher's chart or map;
( 3 ) Was not accurately displayed on a visual display in the cockpit, or
( 4 ) Was obviously defective or deficient;
( e ) The publisher does not give notice as required by § 15.107 of this part and that failure is prejudicial to the Government; or
( f ) The publisher does not appeal a lower court's decision pursuant to a request by the Administrator under § 15.111(d)(2) of this part.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-20362

Summary Calendar

JESSIE LEE WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

HARRIS COUNTY DEPUTY D. HARRISON, CO-II Guard; KELLY STRONG, 

Senior Warden; T. BURSON, Unit Major; BRYANT COLLIER, Texas 

Department of Criminal Justice Director; B. SMITH, Assistant Warden,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:17-CV-3326

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jessie Lee Washington, Texas prisoner # 901757, proceeding pro se, 

appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as barred under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(g). Additionally, he moves for the appointment of counsel.

Washington does not challenge the district court’s determination that, 

on at least three prior occasions while incarcerated, he has brought a civil

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-20362 Document: 00514750773 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2018
No. 18-20362

2

action or appeal in a United States court that was dismissed as frivolous or for 

failure to state a claim. Accordingly, to overcome the § 1915(g) bar, he must 

fall within the “imminent danger” exception.

Washington has not established, nor does the record reflect, that he was 

under imminent danger of serious physical injury when he filed his notices of 

appeal or sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. See Baños 

v. O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 884-85 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, his IFP status is 

decertified, the appeal is dismissed, and the motion for the appointment of 

counsel is denied. Washington has 30 days from the date of this opinion to pay 

the full appellate filing fee should he wish to reinstate his appeal.

IFP DECERTIFIED; § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED; APPEAL DISMISSED; 

MOTION DENIED.

 Case: 18-20362 Document: 00514750773 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2018
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 22

- 00358

- CV

___________________________

Original Pro ceeding

431st District Court of Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 08887

- 431

Before Wallach, Bassel, and Womack, JJ

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion



### I N RE 

### M ARIA 

### D ODD 

### , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opini on that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : September 1 5 , 2022
§ 101.25 Operating limitations for Class 2-High Power Rockets and Class 3-Advanced High Power Rockets. When operating *Class 2-High Power Rockets* or *Class 3-Advanced High Power* Rockets, you must comply with the General Operating Limitations of § 101.23. In addition, you must not operate *Class 2-High Power Rockets* or *Class 3-Advanced High Power* Rockets— ( a ) At any altitude where clouds or obscuring phenomena of more than five-tenths coverage prevails;
( b ) At any altitude where the horizontal visibility is less than five miles;
( c ) Into any cloud;
( d ) Between sunset and sunrise without prior authorization from the FAA;
( e ) Within 9.26 kilometers (5 nautical miles) of any airport boundary without prior authorization from the FAA;
( f ) In controlled airspace without prior authorization from the FAA;
( g ) Unless you observe the greater of the following separation distances from any person or property that is not associated with the operations: ( 1 ) Not less than one-quarter the maximum expected altitude;
( 2 ) 457 meters (1,500 ft.);
( h ) Unless a person at least eighteen years old is present, is charged with ensuring the safety of the operation, and has final approval authority for initiating high-power rocket flight; and
( i ) Unless reasonable precautions are provided to report and control a fire caused by rocket activities.
[74 FR 38092, July 31, 2009, as amended by Amdt. 101-8, 74 FR 47435, Sept. 16, 2009]
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Albert Dewayne Beasley v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-11-00987-CR

Trial court case number: 10-CR-2663

Trial court: 56th District Court, Galveston County, Texas

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

The en banc Court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, 

Bland, Sharp, Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.

Date: February 26, 2013