alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 133.17 Requirements for issuance of a rotorcraft external-load operator certificate.

If an applicant shows that he complies with §§ 133.19, 133.21, and 133.23, the Administrator issues a Rotorcraft External-Load Operator Certificate to him with an authorization to operate specified rotorcraft with those classes of rotorcraft-load combinations for which he complies with the applicable provisions of subpart D of this part.
§ 119.39 Issuing or denying a certificate. ( a ) An applicant may be issued an Air Carrier Certificate or Operating Certificate if, after investigation, the Administrator finds that the applicant— ( 1 ) Meets the applicable requirements of this part;
( 2 ) Holds the economic authority applicable to the kinds of operations to be conducted, issued by the Department of Transportation, if required; and
( 3 ) Is properly and adequately equipped in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and is able to conduct a safe operation under appropriate provisions of part 121 or part 135 of this chapter and operations specifications issued under this part.
( b ) An application for a certificate may be denied if the Administrator finds that— ( 1 ) The applicant is not properly or adequately equipped or is not able to conduct safe operations under this subchapter;
( 2 ) The applicant previously held an Air Carrier Certificate or Operating Certificate which was revoked;
( 3 ) The applicant intends to or fills a key management position listed in § 119.65(a) or § 119.69(a), as applicable, with an individual who exercised control over or who held the same or a similar position with a certificate holder whose certificate was revoked, or is in the process of being revoked, and that individual materially contributed to the circumstances causing revocation or causing the revocation process;
( 4 ) An individual who will have control over or have a substantial ownership interest in the applicant had the same or similar control or interest in a certificate holder whose certificate was revoked, or is in the process of being revoked, and that individual materially contributed to the circumstances causing revocation or causing the revocation process; or
( 5 ) In the case of an applicant for an Operating Certificate for intrastate common carriage, that for financial reasons the applicant is not able to conduct a safe operation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,415,446
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,887,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,772,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,040,359
<PP&E>                                       3,973,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,469,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,145,747
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       237,226
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,687,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,469,535
<SALES>                                     32,229,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,229,858
<CGS>                                       20,013,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,013,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,766,339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             160,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                449,785
<INCOME-TAX>                                    63,451
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            243,865
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   243,865
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
BULLETIN 1043

PLATE 3
EXPLANATION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

I
Tes

Shinarump member of the Chinle formation

\ es

\ Basal contact of the Shinarump member

ek Ss

aa ee NO 2 MINE.
. \

WA
AA ae
CeO

B.— Compiled by field methods

A.— Compiled by photogeologic methods

ISOPACH MAPS OF THE MONUMENT NO. 2 AREA, ARIZONA, COMPILED BY
PHOTOGEOLOGIGC AND FIELD METHODS

0 1000 2000 3000 FEET
L 1

1000
bo J

551404 O ~ 60 (In pocket)
#### § 308.157 Denial of applications.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 64366, Aug. 7, 2024.

If an application is denied under 12 CFR part 303, subpart L, then the applicant may request a hearing under this subpart. The applicant will have 60 days after the date of the denial to file a written request with the Administrative Officer. In the request, the applicant shall state the relief desired, the grounds supporting the request for relief, and provide any supporting evidence that the applicant believes is responsive to the grounds for the denial.

[86 FR 2250, Jan. 12, 2021]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Nos. 04-13-00052-CR & 04-13-00053-CR

Edna Tatiana PENA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2012CR10627W & 2012CR9404W

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 13, 2013

DISMISSED

On January 28, 2013, we notified the appellant that the trial court’s certifications in these 

appeals state that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of 

appeal.” Additionally, the clerk’s record contains a written waiver signed by the appellant 

pursuant to which she entered a plea of guilty. The trial court’s judgment also shows that there 

was a plea bargain agreement, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment 

recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. Therefore, the trial court’s 
04-13-00052-CR & 04-13-00053-CR

- 2 -

certifications accurately reflect that these criminal cases are plea-bargain cases. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 25.2(a)(2).

In our January 28, 2013 order, we warned appellant that these appeals would be 

dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless amended trial court 

certifications showing that appellant had the right to appeal were made part of the appellate 

records. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 2003, order). No amended trial court certifications have been filed. These appeals are, 

therefore, dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
Motion Granted; Order filed October 10, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00307-CR

____________

CHARLES RAY BLACKLOCK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1474533

ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Kevin Howard. Appellant’s 

brief was originally due July 8, 2019. We have granted a total of 90 days to file 

appellant’s brief until October 7, 2019. When we granted the last extension, we noted 

that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional circumstances. No 

brief was filed. On October 7, 2019, counsel filed a further request for extension of 
time to file appellant’s brief. Counsel did not allege any exceptional circumstances 

in the request. 

We grant the request for extension and issue the following order.

Accordingly, we order Kevin Howard to file a brief with the clerk of this court 

on or before November 12, 2019. If counsel does not timely file appellant’s brief as 

ordered, the court may issue an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court 

to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the brief and the 

consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel, or other appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan.
| (1)  | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. |

| May 6, 2011                              |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     |   |
|                                     |   |
| /s/Jeffrey R. Immelt                     |   |
| Jeffrey R. ImmeltChief Executive Officer |   |
|                           |   |
| /s/Keith S. Sherin                       |   |
| Keith S. SherinChief Financial Officer   |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       18
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    19
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      19
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                          18
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        19
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William J. McEntee, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    WILLIAM J. MCENTEE,
JR.                   
|                      |  |  |  | William J. McEntee, Jr.                          
|                      |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2












CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)












In connection with the Report of HST
Global, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Wesley D. Tate, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), that to my knowledge:







1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Date:
November 13, 2009







\s\ Wesley D.
Tate


Wesley D.
Tate


Chief
Financial Officer
MUSSELSHELL

WHEATLAND GOLDEN

 VALLEY 

SWEET GRASS

YELLOWSTONE

STILLWATER

BIG HORN 

CARBON 

Wildland Fire

Locations of Wildfires 

from 1980 - 2009

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument Draft RMP / EIS

Map 36

US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

8 Fire History 1980 - 2009

Counties

Montana

 Wyoming

0 3 6 12 18 24 30

Map scale 1:1,350,000

Miles

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means an information may be updated without notification.

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü
#### § 121.237 Oil lines and fittings in designated fire zones.

Oil line and fittings in each designated fire zone must comply with § 121.259.
# Official Journal C 83A/6 Ap

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 83A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 496 April 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 83A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 496 April 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 083A/1 | Publication of a vacancy for Vice-President of the Community Plant Variety Office (Grade A*12) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2006/10022 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2006/C 083A/1

Publication of a vacancy for Vice-President of the Community Plant Variety Office (Grade A*12) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2006/10022

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
###### Editorial Note on Part 139

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

#### § 139.331 Obstructions.

In a manner authorized by the Administrator, each certificate holder must ensure that each object in each area within its authority that has been determined by the FAA to be an obstruction is removed, marked, or lighted, unless determined to be unnecessary by an FAA aeronautical study. FAA Advisory Circulars contain methods and procedures for the lighting of obstructions that are acceptable to the Administrator.
§ 1216.303 NEPA process in NASA planning and decision making. ( a ) NEPA is a procedural statute intended to ensure Federal agencies consider the environmental impacts of their proposed actions in the decision-making process. Full integration of the NEPA process with NASA project and program planning improves Agency decisions and ensures: ( 1 ) Consideration of sustainability, environmental stewardship, and compliance with applicable environmental statutes, regulations, and policies.
( 2 ) NASA's analyses and documentation are prepared using a process that is transparent to the public, including opportunities for receipt and consideration of public comment, when appropriate.
( 3 ) Potential program and project risks and delays are minimized.
( b ) In considering whether the effects of a proposed action are significant and determining the appropriate level of NEPA review and documentation (*i.e.,* EIS, environmental assessments (EA), categorical exclusions (CatEx)), NASA shall consider and analyze the potentially affected environment (*i.e.,* affected area [national, regional, or local] and resources located therein) and the degree of the effects of the proposed action (*e.g.,* short- and long-term effects, effects both beneficial and adverse, effects on public health and safety, effects that would violate Federal, state, Tribal, or local law protecting the environment).
( c ) NASA shall consider the reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts of a proposed Agency action, along with technical, economic, public health and safety, security, and other factors that are reasonably foreseeable, beginning in the early planning stage of a proposed action. NASA will not take any action that would have an adverse environmental impact or limit the choice of reasonable alternatives prior to completing NEPA review except as provided in 40 CFR 1506.1.
( d ) Records of Environmental Consideration (RECs) will be used to document: ( 1 ) Application of specific categorical exclusions to proposed actions;
( 2 ) Adoption of Federal draft or final NEPA documents;
( 3 ) Reevaluation of an existing NEPA document; and
( 4 ) Determination of whether an action fits within an existing NEPA document, including a programmatic NEPA document.
[89 FR 25500, Apr. 11, 2024]
# Official Journal C 218I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 218I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 632 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 218I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 632 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 218 I/01 | Council Decision of 26 June 2020 appointing seven members of the Management Board of the European Food Safety Authority | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 218 I/01

Council Decision of 26 June 2020 appointing seven members of the Management Board of the European Food Safety Authority

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Amendment dated November 8, 2003



 
CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT 
EXHIBIT 10.48 
 
PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO REGISTRANT’S APPLICATION OBJECTING
TO DISCLOSURE AND REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 24b-2; THE OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN MARKED WITH BRACKETS. 
 
AMENDMENT 
 
Between: 
 

	1.	 	Lyondell Chemie Nederland, B.V. at Theemsweg 14, Botlek, 3000 HD Rotterdam, The Netherlands (“Seller”); and 

 

	2.	 	Styrochem Finland Oy having its registered office at P.O. Box 360, 06101 Porvoo, Finland (“Buyer”). 

 
Whereas: 
 

	A.	 	ARCO Chemie Nederland, Ltd. (which had its name changed to Lyondell Chemical Nederland, Ltd. [“LCNL”]) and Buyer entered into an agreement for the sale and
purchase of Styrene Monomer T2 (“Product”) on 1 January 1998 (“the Agreement”). 

 

	B.	 	The Agreement was assigned by LCNL to Seller on 31 October 2000. 

 

	C.	 	Seller and Buyer wish to amend the quantity (article 2.1) and duration (article 3) stated in the Agreement. 

 
Agree as follows: 
 

	1.	 	Article 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended so that it reads as follows: 

 

	 	“2.1	 	Buyer shall purchase and Seller shall sell the following quantities of Product +/- 5% at Buyer’s option: 

 

	 1998
	  	 [        ] KT

	 1999
	  	 [        ] KT

	 2000
	  	 [        ] KT

	 2001
	  	 [        ] KT

	 2002
	  	 [        ] KT

	 2003
	  	 [        ] KT

	 2004 and beyond
	  	 [        ] KT


 

	2.	 	Article 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended so that it reads as follows: 

 
“This Agreement shall come into force on 1 January 1998 and shall continue for an initial period of
seven years. It shall continue thereafter unless and until terminated by either party giving not less than one calendar year prior written notice to the other party expiring on 31 December 2004 at the earliest.” 
 










	3.	 	All references in the Agreement to Incoterms 1990 are hereby amended to include any amendment thereto. 

 

	4.	 	As provided in Section 8.8 of the Agreement, all references to Deutsch Mark are replaced by references to Euro. 

 

	5.	 	All other terms of the Agreement shall remain the same. 

 
Thus agreed on Nov 8th, 2002. 
 

	 Lyondell Chemie Nederland, B.V.

	
	 By:
	 	   /s/  [signature illegible] Walsh


	
	 Title:
	 	 Director European Business Services



 

	
	 Styrochem Finland Oy

	
	 By:
	 	   /s/  Henrik Akermak


	
	 Title:
	 	 M.D. [Managing Director]
§ 1261.311 Claims requiring Department of Justice approval or consultation. ( a ) When in the opinion of the NASA official designated in § 1261.308, Department of Justice approval or consultation may be required, pursuant to 28 CFR part 14, in connection with a claim being acted upon under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the following papers shall be forwarded to the General Counsel: ( 1 ) A short and concise statement of the facts of the claim.
( 2 ) Copies of all relevant portions of the claim file.
( 3 ) A statement of the recommendations or views of the forwarding official.
( b ) A claim forwarded to the General Counsel in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, or upon which the General Counsel is acting pursuant to § 1261.308(c), shall be referred to the Department of Justice when, in the opinion of the General Counsel, Department of Justice approval or consultation is required or may be appropriate.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00223

- CV

IN RE FALLS COUNTY

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(d).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition Denied

Opinion delivered and filed August 27, 2015

[OT06]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1251

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1251 appear at 81 FR 3709, Jan. 22, 2016.

#### § 1251.300 Discrimination prohibited.

No qualified individual with a disability shall, because a recipient's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with disabilities, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity to which this part applies.