alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          37,290
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,406
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                33,950
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    158,762
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             687
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               701
<LOANS>                                        739,019
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,005,038
<DEPOSITS>                                     682,489
<SHORT-TERM>                                   124,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,531
<LONG-TERM>                                     32,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,964
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,005,038
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 63,485
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,060
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,127
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                74,672
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              25,190
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,044
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           40,628
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,982
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 245
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 30,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,372
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,199
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,199
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.58
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,710
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,456
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,032
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,215
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,060
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,859
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,859
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
§ 137.29 General. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, this subpart prescribes rules that apply to persons and aircraft used in agricultural aircraft operations conducted under this part.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) The holder of an agricultural aircraft operator certificate may deviate from the provisions of part 91 of this chapter without a certificate of waiver, as authorized in this subpart for dispensing operations, when conducting nondispensing aerial work operations related to agriculture, horticulture, or forest preservation in accordance with the operating rules of this subpart.
( d ) Sections 137.31 through 137.35, §§ 137.41, and 137.53 through 137.59 do not apply to persons and aircraft used in agricultural aircraft operations conducted with public aircraft.
( e ) Sections 137.31 through 137.35, §§ 137.39, 137.41, 137.51 through 137.59, and subpart D do not apply to persons and rotorcraft used in agricultural aircraft operations conducted by a person holding a certificate under part 133 of this chapter and involving only the dispensing of water on forest fires by rotorcraft external-load means. However, the operation shall be conducted in accordance with— ( 1 ) The rules of part 133 of this chapter governing rotorcraft external-load operations; and
( 2 ) The operating rules of this subpart contained in §§ 137.29, 137.37, and §§ 137.43 through 137.49.
[Doc. No. 1464, 30 FR 8106, June 24, 1965, as amended by Amdt. 137-3, 33 FR 9601, July 2, 1968; Amdt. 137-6, 41 FR 35060, Aug. 19, 1976]
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 07/25 /2014 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR– 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Coalition on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases (C
- AGG) Meeting held on 07/1 5 /2014 **SUMMARY :**  EPA Region 8 ’s Acting Assistant Regional Administrator, Callie Videtich, p articipated in a panel discussion by giving remarks and answering questions on the proposed Clean Power Plan for E xisting Power Plants at the C - AGG meeting held on 07/1 5 /2014 in Denver, CO . Th e Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  **Region 8** Callie Videtich **External Stakeholders** See attached.
#### R. J. & B. F. Camp Lumber Co. et al., Appellants, v. C. H. Tedder, Appellee.

Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Hamilton County.

A. B. & C. C. Small, for Appellants.

James F. Glen, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submittéd to the court upon transcript of record and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the court having duly considered the same and finding no reversible error, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the order of the Circuit Court, to which the appeal was taken and entered, be and the same is hereby affirmed at the cost of the Appellants.
#### § 1214.1105 Final ranking.

Final rankings will be based on a combination of the selection board's initial evaluations and the results of the interview process. Veteran's preference will be included in this final ranking in accordance with applicable regulations.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-87553, 333-95279, 333-95933, 333-36228, 333-40476, 333-44418, 333-51504, 333-63080, 333-81776, and 333-123861) of Critical Path, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2006, except for theeffects of discontinued operations as discussed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is March 25, 2008 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

March 31, 2008
# Official Journal L 300I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 300I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6314 September 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 300I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6314 September 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2020/1271 of 11 September 2020 adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2020 | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2020/1271 of 11 September 2020 adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2020

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
April 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 136184 & (68) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ ____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices In re BRIANA CHURCH and KEELEY CHURCH, Minors.

_____________ _______________ ____________
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 136184 COA: 279652

ANGELA CHURCH, Respondent-Appellant, St. Joseph CC Family Division: 05-000209-NA

and

DONALD RAY CHURCH, Respondent.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 11, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to consolidate is DENIED.

s0422 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
April 25, 2008
Clerk
#### § 121.613 Dispatch or flight release under IFR or over the top.

Except as provided in § 121.615, no person may dispatch or release an aircraft for operations under IFR or over-the-top, unless appropriate weather reports or forecasts, or any combination thereof, indicate that the weather conditions will be at or above the authorized minimums at the estimated time of arrival at the airport or airports to which dispatched or released.

[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19222, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-33, 32 FR 13912, Oct. 6, 1967]
220808 ORD RE ADMIN BAR DATE BRIEFING EXT VERSION AUGUST 8, 2022 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

ORDER GRANTING THE URGENT

CONSENSUAL MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES

Upon the Urgent Consensual Motion for Extension of Deadlines (Docket Entry No. 21784

in Case No. 17-3283) (the “Extension Motion”);2 and the Court having found that the relief 

requested in the Extension Motion is in the best interests of the Oversight Board, Ivelisse CalderónAlibrán, and Carlos Torres Viada; and the Court having found that the Oversight Board provided 

adequate and appropriate notice of the Extension Motion under the circumstances and that no other 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); 

(iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 

BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public 

Building Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-LTS). (Title III case 

numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

2 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to them 

in the Extension Motion.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21791 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/08/22 17:05:52 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
or further notice is required; and the Court having reviewed the Extension Motion; and the Court 

having determined that the factual bases set forth in the Extension Motion establish just cause for 

the relief granted herein; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, it is

hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Extension Motion is granted as set forth herein.

2. Responses to the Motion, if any, must be filed by September 9, 2022, at 

5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). 

3. Replies, if any, must be filed by September 23, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic 

Standard Time).

4. This Order resolves Docket Entry No. 21784 in Case No. 17-3283. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 8, 2022

 /s/Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21791 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/08/22 17:05:52 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 1253.505 Employment criteria. A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for any employment opportunity that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless: ( a ) Use of such test or other criterion is shown to predict validly successful performance in the position in question; and
( b ) Alternative tests or criteria for such purpose, which do not have such disproportionately adverse effect, are shown to be unavailable.
Editorial Note on Part 139
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

§ 139.333 Protection of NAVAIDS. In a manner authorized by the Administrator, each certificate holder must— ( a ) Prevent the construction of facilities on its airport that, as determined by the Administrator, would derogate the operation of an electronic or visual NAVAID and air traffic control facilities on the airport;
( b ) Protect—or if the owner is other than the certificate holder, assist in protecting—all NAVAIDS on its airport against vandalism and theft; and
( c ) Prevent, insofar as it is within the airport's authority, interruption of visual and electronic signals of NAVAIDS.
§ 129.107 Repairs assessment for pressurized fuselages. ( a ) No foreign air carrier or foreign persons operating a U.S. registered airplane may operate an Airbus Model A300 (excluding −600 series), British Aerospace Model BAC 1-11, Boeing Model 707, 720, 727, 737, or 747, McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8, DC-9/MD-80 or DC-10, Fokker Model F28, or Lockheed Model L-1011 beyond the applicable flight cycle implementation time specified below, or May 25, 2001, whichever occurs later, unless operations specifications have been issued to reference repair assessment guidelines applicable to the fuselage pressure boundary (fuselage skin, door skin, and bulkhead webs), and those guidelines are incorporated in its maintenance program. The repair assessment guidelines must be approved by the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office for the type certificate for the affected airplane. ( 1 ) For the Airbus Model A300 (excluding the -600 series), the flight cycle implementation time is: ( i ) Model B2: 36,000 flights.
( ii ) Model B4-100 (including Model B4-2C): 30,000 flights above the window line, and 36,000 flights below the window line.
( iii ) Model B4-200: 25,500 flights above the window line, and 34,000 flights below the window line.
( 2 ) For all models of the British Aerospace BAC 1-11, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,000 flights.
( 3 ) For all models of the Boeing 707, the flight cycle implementation time is 15,000 flights.
( 4 ) For all models of the Boeing 720, the flight cycle implementation time is 23,000 flights.
( 5 ) For all models of the Boeing 727, the flight cycle implementation time is 45,000 flights.
( 6 ) For all models of the Boeing 737, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,00 flights.
( 7 ) For all models of the Boeing 747, the flight cycle implementation time is 15,000 flights.
( 8 ) For all models of the McDonnell Douglas DC-8, the flight cycle implementation time is 30,000 flights.
( 9 ) For all models of the McDonnell Douglas DC-9/MD-80, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,000 flights.
( 10 ) For all models of the McDonnell Douglas DC-10, the flight cycle implementation time is 30,000 flights.
( 11 ) For all models of the Lockheed L-1011, the flight cycle implementation time is 27,000 flights.
( 12 ) For the Fokker F-28 Mark 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,000 flights.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Doc. No. 29104, 65 FR 24126, Apr. 25, 2000; 65 FR 35703, June 5, 2000, as amended by Amdt. 129-30, 66 FR 23131, May 7, 2001; Amdt. 129-35, 67 FR 72834, Dec. 9, 2002; Amdt. 129-39, 69 FR 45942, July 30, 2004. Redesignated and amended by Amdt. 129-43, 72 FR 63413, Nov. 8, 2007; Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 129-53, 83 FR 9174, Mar. 5, 2018]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of May 1, 2000.

A closed meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 3, 2000 at 11 a.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.

                    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5                           ( print page 25411)                        U.S.C. 552(c)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10), permit consideration for the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.                

The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled Wednesday, May 3, 2000 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and, Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

Dated: April 26, 2000.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10836  Filed 4-26-00; 4:20 pm]

BILLING CODE 8101-01-M
#### § 1263.102 Procedure when a demand is issued in a legal proceeding involving the United States.

Whenever an employee or former employee of NASA receives a demand for production of materials or the disclosure of information, or for appearance and testimony as a witness in a legal proceeding in which NASA or the United States is a party, the employee shall immediately notify in writing the Installation Chief Counsel for Installation employees, the General Counsel for Headquarters employees, or the Attorney-Adviser to the Inspector General (IG) for IG employees. This notice must include copies of all pertinent legal documents and a summary of the employee's knowledge concerning the legal proceeding in question. When necessary, this information may be reported orally, followed by a written confirmation.
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.401 Scope.

The rules and procedures set forth in this subpart and subpart A of this part are applicable to proceedings by the NCUA Board pursuant to section 120(b)(1) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1766(b)(1)) to suspend or revoke the charter of a solvent Federal credit union, and to place a solvent Federal credit union into involuntary liquidation. To the extent a rule or procedure set forth in subpart A of this part is inconsistent with a rule or procedure set forth in this subpart E, subpart E shall control.

[56 FR 37767, Aug. 8, 1991; 57 FR 523, Jan. 7, 1992]
§ 135.245 Second in command qualifications. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no certificate holder may use any person, nor may any person serve, as second in command of an aircraft unless that person holds at least a commercial pilot certificate with appropriate category and class ratings and an instrument rating.
( b ) A second in command of a helicopter operated under VFR, other than over-the-top, must have at least a commercial pilot certificate with an appropriate aircraft category and class rating.
( c ) No certificate holder may use any person, nor may any person serve, as second in command under IFR unless that person meets the following instrument experience requirements: ( 1 ) *Use of an airplane or helicopter for maintaining instrument experience.* Within the 6 calendar months preceding the month of the flight, that person performed and logged at least the following tasks and iterations in-flight in an airplane or helicopter, as appropriate, in actual weather conditions, or under simulated instrument conditions using a view-limiting device: ( i ) Six instrument approaches;
( ii ) Holding procedures and tasks; and
( iii ) Intercepting and tracking courses through the use of navigational electronic systems.
( 2 ) *Use of an FSTD for maintaining instrument experience.* A person may accomplish the requirements in paragraph (c)(1) of this section in an approved FSTD, or a combination of aircraft and FSTD, provided: ( i ) The FSTD represents the category of aircraft for the instrument rating privileges to be maintained;
( ii ) The person performs the tasks and iterations in simulated instrument conditions; and
( iii ) A flight instructor qualified under § 135.338 or a check pilot qualified under § 135.337 observes the tasks and iterations and signs the person's logbook or training record to verify the time and content of the session.
( d ) A second in command who has failed to meet the instrument experience requirements of paragraph (c) of this section for more than six calendar months must reestablish instrument recency under the supervision of a flight instructor qualified under § 135.338 or a check pilot qualified under § 135.337. To reestablish instrument recency, a second in command must complete at least the following areas of operation required for the instrument rating practical test in an aircraft or FSTD that represents the category of aircraft for the instrument experience requirements to be reestablished: ( 1 ) Air traffic control clearances and procedures;
( 2 ) Flight by reference to instruments;
( 3 ) Navigation systems;
( 4 ) Instrument approach procedures;
( 5 ) Emergency operations; and
( 6 ) Postflight procedures.
[44 FR 26738, May 7, 1979, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2016-6142, 83 FR 30283, June 27, 2018]