alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CLANTON DRUG CO. v. MONTAG BROS.

(Decided April 13, 1915.)

Appeal from Chilton Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
§ 135.331 Crewmember emergency training. ( a ) Each training program must provide emergency training under this section for each aircraft type, model, and configuration, each crewmember, and each kind of operation conducted, as appropriate for each crewmember and the certificate holder.
( b ) Emergency training must provide the following: ( 1 ) Instruction in emergency assignments and procedures, including coordination among crewmembers.
( 2 ) Individual instruction in the location, function, and operation of emergency equipment including— ( i ) Equipment used in ditching and evacuation;
( ii ) First aid equipment and its proper use; and
( iii ) Portable fire extinguishers, with emphasis on the type of extinguisher to be used on different classes of fires.
( 3 ) Instruction in the handling of emergency situations including— ( i ) Rapid decompression;
( ii ) Fire in flight or on the surface and smoke control procedures with emphasis on electrical equipment and related circuit breakers found in cabin areas;
( iii ) Ditching and evacuation;
( iv ) Illness, injury, or other abnormal situations involving passengers or crewmembers; and
( v ) Hijacking and other unusual situations.
( 4 ) Review of the certificate holder's previous aircraft accidents and incidents involving actual emergency situations.
( c ) Each crewmember must perform at least the following emergency drills, using the proper emergency equipment and procedures, unless the Administrator finds that, for a particular drill, the crewmember can be adequately trained by demonstration: ( 1 ) Ditching, if applicable.
( 2 ) Emergency evacuation.
( 3 ) Fire extinguishing and smoke control.
( 4 ) Operation and use of emergency exits, including deployment and use of evacuation chutes, if applicable.
( 5 ) Use of crew and passenger oxygen.
( 6 ) Removal of life rafts from the aircraft, inflation of the life rafts, use of life lines, and boarding of passengers and crew, if applicable.
( 7 ) Donning and inflation of life vests and the use of other individual flotation devices, if applicable.
( d ) Crewmembers who serve in operations above 25,000 feet must receive instruction in the following: ( 1 ) Respiration.
( 2 ) Hypoxia.
( 3 ) Duration of consciousness without supplemental oxygen at altitude.
( 4 ) Gas expansion.
( 5 ) Gas bubble formation.
( 6 ) Physical phenomena and incidents of decompression.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement Nos. 33-70050, 33-80985, 333-32237 and 333-57754 of Aldila, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report datedFebruary 12, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Aldila,Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

 
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| San Diego, California          |
| April 9, 2004                  |
August 2, 2013

Dr. David Danielson Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC 20585

Dear Assistant Secretary Danielson :

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“ Samsung ”) respectfully submits this Application for Interim Waiver and Petition for Waiver to the Department of Energy (“DOE” or “the Department”) for Samsung’s compressor refrigerator

- freezers with multiple defrost cycles.

Reasoning 10 CFR Part 430.27(a)(1) allows a person to submit a petition to waive for a particular basic model any requirements of §430.23 upon the grounds that the basic model contains one or more design characteristics which either prevent testing of the basic model according to the prescribed test procedures, or the prescribed test procedures may evaluate the basic model in a manner so unrepresentative of its true energy consumption characteristics as to provide materially in acc urate comparative data. Current test procedures as prescribed in Appendix A1 to Subpart B of Part 430 (“Appendix A1”) do not adequately provide a way for Samsung to accurately represent the

energy consumption of its refrigerator

- freezers with multiple defrost cycles

. DOE concurred with Samsung’s understanding in the interim waiver granted to Samsung in 76 FR 16760 1 and subsequently granted the waiver on January 10, 2012 (77 FR 1474). Additionally, DOE

communicated that all manufacturers planning on marketing refrigerator

- freezers with multiple defrost cycles must seek a waiver from the Department. 2

For the reasons that DOE described in its granting of waiver (77 FR 1474) f or Samsung refrigerator freezers with multi ple defrost cycles , Samsung believes that the granting of Interim

Waiver and Waiver for the models listed below are warranted.

1 DOE understands, however, that absent an interim waiver, Samsung’s products would not be accurately tested and rated for
energy consumption because the current energy test procedure does not include test procedures for products with multiple defr ost cycle types.

2 Until these amendments are required in conjunction with the 2014 standards, manufacturers introducing products equipped with
multiple defrost cycle types should, consistent with 10 CFR 430.27, petition for a waiver since the modified version of Appendix A1 set out in today’s notice will not include a specified method for capturing this energy usage.Request

Samsung requests that the a lternate t est p rocedure for refrigerators with multiple defrost cycles, as prescribed in the waiver (77 FR 1474) and in the interim waiver ( 77 FR 13109 ) granted to Samsung, be granted for the following basic Samsung refrigerator

- freezers with multiple defrost cycles models:

. RF28HM*LB**

. RF28HM*DB**

. RF28HF*DT**

. RF28HF*DB**

. RF23HC*DT**

. RF23HC*DB**

. RF25HM*DB**

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver

. I will be happy to discuss should any questions arise.

Sincerely,

Michael Moss

Director of Corporate Environmental Affairs
p. 1


# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 105 ) ll-E-6 5 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:06

AM Sheet 105 of 264P. 2 MR R 13'9 7 16:0 6 F R v, \ xMf «3/l*/fl ? Hi3 3 9ltltM10z3 4 86 4 89 8 405 9 T O 91919941023 4 PE S RI P N

C 12003/00 3 P . 0 1 / 0_ 1 

## A-94-5 2 

# ir-e-^i r

From : Date : Contac t Company : Conne rRepor t

Kenwah R . Mesnktn , Pacifi c Environmenta l Marc h 13,199 7 Mr. Stev e Holder Ryob i Moto r Product

s Corporation

. Telephon e Number : (864 ) 873-633 1 Ta x Nttt-h« n (864 ) 198-405 9 Contac tSummary ; lnrespew_stonry-g-i«p_st_-S , Mr.Holderi«ikaiedt_ ^ (1 ) ih e typ e o f moldin g «j_nwundprcK_icedaiitidr_£_ir/isabu_: ^ machine s use d a tthei r £__oty ar e injectio n moldin g o_d__3;ai_^ ) (h e fic_iry i s probabl y a majo r sowe e (i.e- , emits eithera tleas t1 0 tons pa

r year o f a singl e hazardous a

_pollutan t(HAP ) o ratlea a 2 5 ton s pe r year o f multipl e HAP) . Mr

. Holderals o noted thatthe y hav e reduce d thei r « r emission s a

r th e ficfliry.

INFORMATIO N I S ACCURATE . / 

# _r-J- f 3- ? ;

MA R 1 3 '9 7 11:4 0 191-341023 4 POSE.80 3

* * TOTA L PAGE.00 1 * * ( /• )
§ 171.27 Performance requirements. ( a ) The facility must meet the performance requirements set forth in the “International Standards and Recommended Practices, Aeronautical Telecommunications, Part I, paragraph 3.4” (Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation), except that identification by on-off keying of a second carrier frequency, separated from the main carrier by 1020 Hz plus or minus 50 Hz, is also acceptable.
( b ) The facility must perform in accordance with recognized and accepted good electronic engineering practices for the desired service.
( c ) Ground inspection consists of an examination of the design features of the equipment to determine (based on recognized and accepted good engineering practices) that there will not be conditions that will allow unsafe operations because of component failure or deterioration.
( d ) Flight tests to determine the facility's adequacy for operational requirements and compliance with applicable “Standards and Recommended Practices” are conducted in accord- ance with the “U.S. Standard Flight Inspection Manual”, particularly section 207. The original test is made by the FAA and later tests shall be made under arrangements, satisfactory to the FAA, that are made by the owner.
[Doc. No. 5034, 29 FR 11337, Aug. 6, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 171-7, 35 FR 12711, Aug. 11, 1970]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6789** 

BILLY RAY MANEY , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. RICHARD NEELY, Superintendent , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Norfolk , at Asheville
. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00069

- RJC )

Submitted : July 25, 2013 Decided: July 30, 2013

Before GREGORY, D AVIS , and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Billy Ray Maney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Billy Ray Maney seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of t he denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the c onstitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the disp ositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Maney has not made the requisite showi ng. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court a nd argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 27/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 27 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6625 January 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 27

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6625 January 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 27/01 | Euro exchange rates – 24 January 2023 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 27/01

Euro exchange rates – 24 January 2023

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### § 161.207 Comment by interested parties.

Each airport operator shall establish a public docket or similar method for receiving and considering comments, and shall make comments available for inspection by interested parties upon request. Comments must be retained as long as the restriction is in effect.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)   In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ron Howell, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: August 12, 2016By:\s\ Ron HowellRon HowellChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 25, 1999,   AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                     0000797463
<NAME>                       GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-25-1999
<CASH>                                                         5,109
<SECURITIES>                                                  77,827
<RECEIVABLES>                                                130,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   3,447
<INVENTORY>                                                    1,376
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   0
<PP&E>                                                        36,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                                10,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               323,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              0
<BONDS>                                                       65,614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                       10
<COMMON>                                                           1
<OTHER-SE>                                                    19,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 323,807
<SALES>                                                        5,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              39,763
<CGS>                                                          5,441
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              11,507
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               1,048
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             6,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                4,606
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   1,220
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            3,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   3,386
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.00


</TABLE>
§ 1264.132 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing shall be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the presiding officer, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written statement or deposition. Any such written statement must be provided to all other parties along with the last known address of such witness, in a manner which allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena such witness for cross-examination at the hearing. Prior written statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing and deposition transcripts shall be exchanged as provided in § 1264.121(a).
( c ) The presiding officer shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth, avoid needless consumption of time, and protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
( d ) The presiding officer shall permit the parties to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( e ) At the discretion of the presiding officer, a witness may be cross-examined on matters relevant to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his or her direct examination. To the extent permitted by the presiding officer, cross-examination on matters outside the scope of direct examination shall be conducted in the manner of direct examination and may proceed by leading questions only if the witness is a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party.
( f ) Upon motion of any party, the presiding officer shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. This rule does not authorize exclusion of— ( 1 ) A party who is an individual;
( 2 ) In the case of a party that is not an individual, an officer or employee of the party appearing for the entity pro se or designated by the party's representative; or
( 3 ) An individual whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including an individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government.
[52 FR 39498, Oct. 22, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 600, Jan. 9, 1989]
# Official Journal C 2/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 2 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 624 January 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 2

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 624 January 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 2/01 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 January 2019 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2019/C 2/02 | Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 2 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 2/01

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 January 2019 — Euro exchange rates

1

2019/C 2/02

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 2/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9180 — Volkswagen/Daimler/HeyCar) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2019/C 2/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9135 — The Blackstone Group/Luminor Bank) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 2/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9180 — Volkswagen/Daimler/HeyCar) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2019/C 2/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9135 — The Blackstone Group/Luminor Bank) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 141.17 Duration of certificate and examining authority. ( a ) Unless surrendered, suspended, or revoked, a pilot school's certificate or a provisional pilot school's certificate expires: ( 1 ) On the last day of the 24th calendar month from the month the certificate was issued;
( 2 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, on the date that any change in ownership of the school occurs;
( 3 ) On the date of any change in the facilities upon which the school's certificate is based occurs; or
( 4 ) Upon notice by the Administrator that the school has failed for more than 60 days to maintain the facilities, aircraft, or personnel required for any one of the school's approved training courses.
( b ) A change in the ownership of a pilot school or provisional pilot school does not terminate that school's certificate if, within 30 days after the date that any change in ownership of the school occurs: ( 1 ) Application is made for an appropriate amendment to the certificate; and
( 2 ) No change in the facilities, personnel, or approved training courses is involved.
( c ) An examining authority issued to the holder of a pilot school certificate expires on the date that the pilot school certificate expires, or is surrendered, suspended, or revoked.
§ 152.417 Monitoring employment. ( a ) Each grantee shall allow the FAA Office of Civil Rights to monitor its equal employment opportunity compliance with this subpart through on-site reviews and desk audits. Reviews or audits will include the records submitted under § 152.415.
( b ) As it deems necessary, the FAA Office of Civil Rights will conduct on-site or desk audits of covered aviation related activities on airports.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

RAKHMATULLA ASATOV, 

Petitioner,

v.

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 

Respondent.

__________________________ 

2013-3160

__________________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. PH1221130310-W-1. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

O R D E R

Rakhmatulla Asatov moves for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted.

Case: 13-3160 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 08/09/2013
ASATOV V. AID 2

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk

s21 

Case: 13-3160 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 08/09/2013