alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

d0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

147993

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147993

COA: 309417

Wayne CC: 11-007105-FH

JEROME LAMONT MILLER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 141.85 Chief instructor responsibilities. ( a ) A chief instructor designated for a pilot school or provisional pilot school is responsible for: ( 1 ) Certifying each student's training record, graduation certificate, stage check and end-of-course test reports, and recommendation for course completion, unless the duties are delegated by the chief instructor to an assistant chief instructor or recommending instructor;
( 2 ) Ensuring that each certificated flight instructor, certificated ground instructor, or commercial pilot with a lighter-than-air rating passes an initial proficiency check prior to that instructor being assigned instructing duties in the school's approved training course, and thereafter that the instructor passes a recurrent proficiency check every 12 calendar months after the month in which the initial test was accomplished;
( 3 ) Ensuring that each student accomplishes the required stage checks and end-of-course tests in accordance with the school's approved training course; and
( 4 ) Maintaining training techniques, procedures, and standards for the school that are acceptable to the Administrator.
( b ) The chief instructor or an assistant chief instructor must be available at the pilot school or, if away from the pilot school, be available by telephone, radio, or other electronic means during the time that training is given for an approved training course.
( c ) The chief instructor may delegate authority for conducting stage checks, end-of-course tests, and flight instructor proficiency checks to the assistant chief instructor or a check instructor.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16347, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 141-9, 62 FR 40908, July 30, 1997; Amdt. 141-12, 74 FR 42564, Aug. 21, 2009]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP00-75-002]

Take notice that on April 19, 2000, Questar Pipeline Company (Questar) tendered for filing and acceptance, to be effective March 10, 2000, Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 2, Substitute Seventh Revised Sheet No. 10, and Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 330 to Original Volume No. 3 of its FERC Gas Tariff.

On March 20, 2000, Questar filed tariff sheets to be effective January 5, 2000. The Commission issued a letter order on April 11, 2000, requiring Questar to file certain revised tariff sheets, within 15 days of the order dated, to correct a typographical error and change the effective date of the tariff sheets to March 10, 2000. Questar's filing complies with the Commission's April 11, 2000, letter order.

Questar states that a copy of this filing has been served upon its customers, the Public Service Commission of Utah and the Public Service Commission of Wyoming.

                    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10860 Filed 5-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### HENRY C. CUMMINS v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. L-337.

Decided June 19, 1933]

*Mr. Julius F. Srrmtcmha*for the plaintiff.

*Mr. Assistant Attorney General Charles B. Rugg*for the ■ defendant. *Mr. John W. Hussey*was on the brief.'

*283Whaley, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiff seeks to recover the income tax paid by him. upon income derived from certain securities which were included in a trust established by plaintiff on February 16, 1923, for the benefit of his dependents and heirs. The trust instrument required that such income be used to satisfy the premiums on insurance policies in the trust upon plaintiff’s life. Plaintiff duly filed his individual income-tax returns for the calendar years 1926 and 1927. Plaintiff did not include in his return the amount of income derived from the trust securities and used to satisfy the premiums on the insurance policies referred to above. Deficiency assessments-were made for the years 1926 and 1927 based upon unreported income. Plaintiff paid the assessments up to October 23, 1929, and on the same day filed claims for refund. The claims were rejected.

The sole issue in this case is the constitutionality of section. 219 (h) of the Revenue Act of 1926.

In the recent case of *Burnet, Commissioner,*v. *Wells,*decided by the Supreme Court on May 29, 1933, the validity of this section of the Revenue Act is upheld. In our opinion, this decision is a complete answer to the question and is controlling in this case. See also *Irenee DuPont*v. *Commissioner,*decided by the Supreme Court on May 29, 1933.

The petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

Williams, *Judge;*Littleton, *Judge;*Green, *Judge;*and; Booth, *Chief Justice,*concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00160-CV

Rhett Webster Pease, Appellant

v.

Texas Attorney General and Janell Pease, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 12,380, HONORABLE JOHN M. DELANEY, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Rhett Webster Pease filed his notice of appeal on March 14, 2008. The

clerk’s record was filed on June 26, 2008, three supplemental clerk’s records were filed on August

20, 2008, August 25, 2008, and December 22, 2008, and the reporter’s record was filed on December

30, 2008. On February 23, 2009, the clerk of this Court sent appellant notice that his brief was

overdue and that his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if he did not respond to this

Court on or before March 5, 2009. To date, appellant has not responded to this Court’s notice.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: June 26, 2009
RE: Step 3 rule - regulatory language added

Kymn, Christine J. to: Juan Santiago 02/24/2012 02:53 PM

Cc: Anna Wood, Howard Hoffman, Kristi Smith, MichaelS Brooks, Lynn 

Hutchinson, Paul Balserak, Pam Long, "Ghorbi, Darian"

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kristi 

Smith/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, MichaelS Brooks/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lynn 

Hutchinson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Pam 

1 attachment

Interagencycomments3 EO 1286613563 EPA NPRM Tailoring Step3 022412.docx

Thanks, Juan. We will let you know if there is any follow up on this most 

recent draft. In the interest of time, I've attached follow up comments 

received thus far. These comments are based on the draft distributed 

yesterday evening. Because of the comment consolidation process, it will be 

difficult to discern what's new in the attached. As such, I'm providing this 

reference list of follow up comments/suggested edits as a legend:

1) Comment A8, P. 11. Reviewer has requested that EPA address prior comment 

that appears to lack response.

2) A12, p. 13. Suggested fn edit.

3) A59, p. 31. Section V.A. Suggested edit in second to last para.

4) A60-62, p. 31. Multiple reviewers suggested edits to economics conditions 

discussion.

5) A67, p. 40. Suggested further clarification for para. Starting 

"Importantly"

6) A79, p. 42. Placeholder comment re: removing TSD reference

7) A143-144, p. 58-59. Multiple reviewers suggested edit to provide further 

CFR cross-reference cites on proposed PALs amendments in order to provide 

notice to the public. 

8) A 148-49, p. 76. Placeholder comment re: removing TSD reference and 

increased specificity of on proposed CFR changes for notice purposes. 

9) p. 84 - correction of typo to "intall"

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Christine 

-----Original Message-----

From: Juan Santiago [mailto:Santiago.Juan@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 1:30 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Anna Wood; Howard Hoffman; Kristi Smith; MichaelS Brooks; Lynn Hutchinson; 

Paul Balserak; Pam Long

Subject: Step 3 rule - regulatory language added

Christine,

Per our conversation earlier today, attached is a complete version of the Step 

3 rule that incorporates the regulatory text that was originally going to be 
in the docket. The references in the text to the docket item have been

removed. In addition, we have added language to comply with the January 4, 

2012 memorandum on "Clarifying Regulatory

Requirements: Executive Summaries".

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Juan E. Santiago

(See attached file: Revised Step 3 Draft - OMB comment response plus reg text 

2-24-12.docx)
BULLETIN 1032 PLATE 9
PORTAL
Elev 9921 ft

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Zin, sheared, zone with waakly
Sphatente, nd lena

PRE-CAMBRIAN

gS.
‘ és s a0) Fae Foot of raise
L 4 L 1
‘Detum is mean sea level

‘Geology by J. E. Harrison, 1952
GEOLOGIC MAP OF PART OF THE MILLER TUNNEL, FREELAND-LAMARTINE DISTRICT, COLORADO

370788 © - 86 (In pocket) No. 6
Adams, Kevin (OSn 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Hi All, 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:40AM 

CMX, Mary Tuisku, Mayor, (Cierk@cityofHancock.com); Dennis Hext 

(dhext@HoughtonCounty.net); Hancock City Manager, Glenn Anderson; Houghton City 

Manager, Scott McGinnis 

Brad Rawson (brad.rawson@skywest.com) 

Request for Comment re the proposal of SkyWest at Hancock/Houghton, MI (the only 

carrier to bid) 

Proposal, SkyWest, Hancock-Houghton.pdf 

Attached above is a copy of the one timely-filed proposal for Essential Air Service (EAS) at 

Hancock/Houghton, submitted by SkyWest. We are currently reviewing those proposals. The attached proposal is 

directly from the carrier and will soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regulations.gov at DOTOST-2009-0302, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding. 

The next step in the carrier-selection process is for you to provide us with your community's comments, a critically 

important element in our carrier-selection decision, especially the comments of civic officials. Accordingly, I ask that 

everyone get back to us, preferably by email, no later than August 13, 2013. We will docket this email, as well as any 

replies. 

In brief, look at the proposal, and if you have any questions, call me, and get back to us by the deadline, August 13. 

Best, 

Kevin Adams 

202-366-1047 

1 

\,, ...... 

·.' ~ 

! ,I ,, ~ ·• 

~····
§ 810.1 Description of Federal Financing Bank bills. ( a ) *General.* Federal Financing Bank bills are bearer obligations of the Federal Financing Bank, the terms of which provide for payment of a specified amount on a specified date. They are issued only by Federal Reserve Banks and Branches, pursuant to tenders accepted by the Federal Financing Bank, and are available in both definitive and book-entry form. Where issued as a definitive security, it shall not be valid unless the issue date, the maturity date and the CUSIP number are imprinted thereon.
( b ) *Denominations.* Federal Financing Bank bills will be issued in denominations of $10,000, $15,000, $50,000, $100,000, $500,000 and $1,000,000 (maturity value).
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3723 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3723

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 8135 Forest Lane in Dallas, Texas, as the ``Vaughn Gross Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 8135 
Forest Lane in Dallas, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Vaughn Gross Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Vaughn Gross Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 29, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.91 How does FAA inform me of its decision on my petition for exemption?

The FAA will notify you in writing about its decision on your petition. A copy of this decision is also placed in the public docket. We will include the docket number associated with your petition in our letter to you.

[Doc. No. FAA-2005-22982, 71 FR 1485, Jan. 10, 2006]
§ 135.121 Alcoholic beverages. ( a ) No person may drink any alcoholic beverage aboard an aircraft unless the certificate holder operating the aircraft has served that beverage.
( b ) No certificate holder may serve any alcoholic beverage to any person aboard its aircraft if that person appears to be intoxicated.
( c ) No certificate holder may allow any person to board any of its aircraft if that person appears to be intoxicated.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1042 PLATE 8

EXPLANATION

Landslide

‘QUATERNARY

‘alluvium

TERTIARY

Basalt

—
Fault, showing dip
a
Vertical fault

Strike and dip of beds
°
Horizontal beds

‘Strike and dip of joints

TAUE Non

MAR, y

erie §
NOR

‘Strike of vertical joints

200 9

Contour interval 10 feet
Datum ie mean te level

— e-oeactens uve, watneron 9.6 gly and tpg oy

GEOLOGIC MAP OF PART OF THE PROPERTY OF THE CONSOLIDATED
QUICKSILVER MINING CORPORATION, WASHINGTON COUNTY, IDAHO
Exhibit 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification
                           --------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of PREMIER
EXHIBITIONS, INC. (the "Company") for the quarter ended November 30, 2005, Arnie
Geller, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, that:



(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 16, 2006          /s/ Arnie Geller
                                 ----------------
                                 Arnie Geller
                                 President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                 Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### § 792.06 Can I obtain other records?

Except with respect to records routinely made available under § 792.02 or published in the Federal Register, or to the extent that records are exempt under the FOIA, if you make a request for records in accordance with this subpart, NCUA will make such records available to you, including records maintained in electronic format, as long as you agree to pay the actual, direct costs.
J.

2 J.

Douglas

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA Cherry

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, RIDGE HOUSE INC.; BEV "UNKNOWN" COUNSELOR (LADC) THE RIDGE HOUSE INC.; DANIEL HIGHT, COUNSELOR (LADC) THE RIDGE HOUSE INC.; WAITER "UNKNOWN" A.K.A. "C.J." HOUSE MANAGER, THE RIDGE HOUSE INC.; GREG COX, DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, STATE OF NEVADA; GREG SMITH, WARDEN, WARM SPRINGS COBB. CENTER, N.D.O.C. STATE OF NV.; CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEVADA; AND BRIAN SANDOVAL, GOVERNOR, STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents.



### ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a proper person petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner challenges the revocation of his parole and claims that his due process rights were violated at the revocation hearing. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. A challenge to the revocation of parole should be raised in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. 

### See NRS 34.360; NRAP 22. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/ ,J. Hardesty

(0) 0147A ey,

### cc: Keith Shannon Hoover Attorney General/Carson City

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 719W
### Adams, Kevin 

## (OSn From: 

### Sent: To:


### Cc: 

### Subject: Attachments:
Hi All, Adams, Kevin (OST) Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:40AM CMX, Mary Tuisku, Mayor, (Cierk@cityofHancock.com); Dennis Hext (dhext@HoughtonCounty.net); Hancock City Manager, Glenn Anderson; Houghton City Manager, Scott McGinnis Brad Rawson (brad.rawson@skywest.com) Request for Comment re the proposal of SkyWest at Hancock/Houghton, MI (the only carrier to bid) Proposal, SkyWest, Hancock-Houghton.pdf

Attached above is a copy ofthe one timely-filed proposal for Essential Air Service (EAS) at Hancock/Houghton, submitted by SkyWest. We are currently reviewing those proposals. The attached proposal is directlyfrom the carrier and will soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regulations.gov at DOTOST-2009-0302, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding. The next step in the carrier-selection process is foryou to provide us withyourcommunity's comments, a critically important element in ourcarrier-selection decision, especiallythe comments ofcivic officials. Accordingly, Iask that everyone get back to us, preferably by email, no laterthan August 13, 2013. We will docketthis email, as well as any replies. In brief, lookatthe proposal, and ifyou have any questions, call me, and get back to us by the deadline, August 13. Best,
Kevin Adams 202-366-1047

1 \,,...... ·.'**~** ! ,I ,,**~** ·•**~····**
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.54



                  [LETTERHEAD OF EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.]


                                  June 8, 2001

VIA FACSIMILE
-------------


Chief Financial Officer
Aquis Communications Group, Inc.
1719A Route 10, Suite 300
Parsippany, NJ 07054
Attn: D. Brian Plunkett

Dear Mr. Plunkett:

         Our client, AMRO International, S.A. ("AMRO"), has authorized us to
advise you that they agree to extend the term of that certain Forbearance
Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated April 13, 2001, by and between Aquis
Communications Group, Inc. (the "Company") and AMRO, end on December 31, 2001
rather than 180 days from the date of the Agreement. Nothing herein shall
nullify or void the provisions in the Agreement that terminate the Agreement in
the event (i) the Company defaults on any material agreement and the other party
to such agreement enforces its rights against the company thereunder, (ii) the
Company terminates its retention of Pirinate Consulting Group, LLC ("Pirinate")
under the agreement entered into between Pirinate and the Company, or (iii)
Pirinate notifies AMRO of its good faith belief that the Company is not
cooperating with Pirinate in its efforts to consult with and assist the Company
pursuant to the terms of the said consulting agreement.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        /s/ Robert Charron
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Robert Charron


cc: Joseph P. Galda, Esq.
    Thomas Badian