alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Max Scheuer et al., Respondents, *v.*Selig Rosenbaum et al., Appellants.

Appeax from an order of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, and from a judgment, entered thereon, affirming a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and affirming an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.

Rose *&*Pptzel (Gibson Putzel, of counsel), for appellants.

L. Hess, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiffs, in their complaint, allege that defendants contracted for a *“*delivery to be made by September 25th,” and that plaintiffs *“*upon the 25th day of September * * * tendered * * * delivery.” In substance plaintiffs allege performance on their part. The only evidence as to delivery, is that of the witness McMahon — called by the plaintiffs — who testifies that he offered the goods on the twenty-fifth of .September, and that the offer was made after Dewey Day, the twenty-ninth. The evidence of the witness O'adwalader is not as to delivery, but merely as to sending the goods out for delivery. The case should not have been submitted to the jury upon the evidence as to delivery on the twenty-fifth, as a finding that there was a delivery on the twenty-fifth was not warranted by the evidence, there was no preponderance of evidence that way

The case should not have been submitted to the jury upon the theory of a waiver of performance as to time, as no waiver had been pleaded. If an amendment conforming the pleadings to the proof were otherwise proper it should not now be made in view of the fact that a motion to dismiss was made at the close of the evidence. The question asked by the counsel for the.defendants after the denial of his motion was, in our opinion an inquiry for information and in no sense a request or acquiescence.

The judgments and orders are reversed and a new trial is ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugkro, JJ.

Judgments and orders reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
§ 13.117 Conduct of investigative proceeding or deposition. ( a ) The presiding officer may question witnesses.
( b ) Any witness may be accompanied by counsel.
( c ) Any party may be accompanied by counsel and either the party or counsel may— ( 1 ) Question witnesses, provided the questions are relevant and material to the matters under investigation and would not unduly impede the progress of the investigation; and
( 2 ) Make objections on the record and argue the basis for such objections.
( d ) Copies of all notices or written communications sent to a party or witness must, upon request, be sent to that person's attorney of record.
§ 1221.115 Violations. ( a ) *NASA Seal.* Any person who uses the NASA Seal in a manner other than as authorized in this subpart shall be subject to the provisions of Title 18 U.S.C. 1017.
( b ) *NASA Insignia, NASA Logotype, and NASA Program Identifiers.* Any person who uses the NASA Insignia, NASA Logotype, or NASA Program Identifier in a manner other than as authorized in this subpart shall be subject to the provisions of title 18 U.S.C. 701.
§ 1240.112 Presentation of awards. ( a ) Written acknowledgments to employees of NASA receiving awards will be provided by the appropriate Official-in-Charge at the Headquarters Office, by the Director of the cognizant NASA Center, or by a designee.
( b ) Written acknowledgments to employees of NASA contractors receiving awards will be forwarded to contractor officials for suitable presentation.
( c ) Monetary awards will be paid by check or electronic funds transfer.
[77 FR 27367, May 10, 2012]
§ 135.327 Training program: Curriculum. ( a ) Each certificate holder must prepare and keep current a written training program curriculum for each type of aircraft for each crewmember required for that type aircraft. The curriculum must include ground and flight training required by this subpart.
( b ) Each training program curriculum must include the following: ( 1 ) A list of principal ground training subjects, including emergency training subjects, that are provided.
( 2 ) A list of all the training devices, mockups, systems trainers, procedures trainers, or other training aids that the certificate holder will use.
( 3 ) Detailed descriptions or pictorial displays of the approved normal, abnormal, and emergency maneuvers, procedures and functions that will be performed during each flight training phase or flight check, indicating those maneuvers, procedures and functions that are to be performed during the inflight portions of flight training and flight checks.
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION



### November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 3

- 00 777

- CR

Style: Kenneth Cooper McAfee

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : March 3, 2014

Type of motion: Extension of time to file appellant’ s brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: January 10, 2014

Number of previous extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: March 4, 2014

Date Requested: June 16, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part, denied in part

If docume nt is to be f

iled, document due: April 4 , 2014

 T he Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

No further extensions will be granted. If the brief is not filed by April 4, 2014, the Court may set a date for

appellant’s counsel to appear and show cause why appellant’s brief was not timely filed.

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: March 11, 2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40623

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

SANTOS SAMUEL HERNANDEZ-CALIX, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:15-CR-1028-1 

Before JOLLY, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santos Samuel 

Hernandez-Calix has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Calix has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fif h Circuit

FILED

March 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40623 Document: 00513920190 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2017
No. 16-40623

2 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED as frivolous, see 5TH 

CIR. R. 42.2. 

 Case: 16-40623 Document: 00513920190 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2017
Wind Potential

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Wyoming

Montana

 Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Map scale 1:1,350,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was Map 151 developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Legend

0 5 10 20 30 40

Miles

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Wind Potential

Low

Moderate

High

Ü
# C_2020036EN.01002702.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/27

---

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Pinto Teixeira v EEAS

(Case T-667/18) ( (1))

(Civil service - Rights and obligations of officials - Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service - Article 16 of the Staff Regulations - Risk of incompatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution - Deadline for responding to the declaration of intention - Implicit acceptance - Prohibition on engaging in an occupational activity after leaving the service - Non-material damage)

(2020/C 36/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: José Manuel Pinto Teixeira (Oeiras, Portugal) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the EEAS of 21 February 2018 prohibiting the applicant from engaging in an outside activity pursuant to Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, secondly, compensation for the damage that the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part

| 1) | The decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 21 February 2018 prohibiting Mr José Manuel Pinto Teixeira from engaging in an outside activity, pursuant to Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, is annulled. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 21 February 2018 prohibiting Mr José Manuel Pinto Teixeira from engaging in an outside activity, pursuant to Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, is annulled.

| 2) | The action is dismissed as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2)

The action is dismissed as to the remainder.

| 3) | Each party shall pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Each party shall pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 14.1.2019.

---
§ 103.9 Hazardous operations. ( a ) No person may operate any ultralight vehicle in a manner that creates a hazard to other persons or property.
( b ) No person may allow an object to be dropped from an ultralight vehicle if such action creates a hazard to other persons or property.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 22, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 22, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0318. DASMANS D. GRUBBS SR. v. G & P TRUCKING et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2015CV268582
#### § 135.433 Maintenance and preventive maintenance training program.

Each certificate holder or a person performing maintenance or preventive maintenance functions for it shall have a training program to ensure that each person (including inspection personnel) who determines the adequacy of work done is fully informed about procedures and techniques and new equipment in use and is competent to perform that person's duties.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 481/2005

of 23 March 2005         

determining the extent to which applications lodged in March 2005 for import licences for certain poultrymeat products under the regime provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 of 22 June 1994, laying down detailed rules for the application in the poultrymeat sector of the import arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products (1) and in particular Article 4(4) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged for the period from 1 April to 30 June 2005 are, in the case of certain products, for quantities less than or equal to the quantities available and can therefore be met in full, but in the case of other products the said applications are for quantities greater than the quantities available and must therefore be reduced by a fixed percentage to ensure a fair distribution,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 April to 30 June 2005 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

2.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2005 may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 for the total quantity as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 156, 23.6.1994, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1043/2001 (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 24).

----

ANNEX

----
Resources

# Critical Habitat - Maps and GIS Data (West Coast Region)

Maps and GIS data for black abalone, bocaccio, Chinook salmon, chum salmon, coho salmon, eulachon, green sturgeon, humpback whale, killer whale, leatherback turtle,  sockeye salmon, steelhead trout, Steller sea lion, and yelloweye rockfish.

Application        Geodatabase        Map Service        

Map|West Coast

These maps and spatial data represent critical habitat proposed or designated by NOAA Fisheries under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in the **West Coast Region** (WCR).

All available critical habitat spatial data can be viewed interactively in the Species and Habitat App, downloaded as a file geodatabase, or accessed through a map service. Metadata is populated in the geodatabase; it can also be viewed in the InPort metadata catalog.

**For each critical habitat dataset, the proposed rule or final rule and Code of Federal Regulations**(50 CFR 226)**should be consulted for the complete description of the proposed or final critical habitat**. Official critical habitat boundaries may include regulatory text that modifies or clarifies maps and spatial data. Proposed rules, final rules, and the CFR also describe any areas that are excluded from critical habitat or otherwise not part of critical habitat (e.g., ineligible areas), some of which have not been clipped out of the spatial data.

**Contact**: Shanna Dunn, Protected Resources Division, West Coast Region, NMFS

  * *= GIS data currently not available.*

Last updated by                                                                     West Coast Regional Office  on 05/15/2024

Endangered Species Act
Critical Habitat
Mapping

## More Information 

                -  Endangered Species Act 
                -  Critical habitat
#### § 1204.1512 [Reserved]
§ 125.141 Engine breather lines. ( a ) Engine breather lines must be so arranged that condensed water vapor that may freeze and obstruct the line cannot accumulate at any point.
( b ) Engine breathers must discharge in a location that does not constitute a fire hazard in case foaming occurs and so that oil emitted from the line does not impinge upon the pilots' windshield.
( c ) Engine breathers may not discharge into the engine air induction system.
§ 1212.200 Procedures for requesting records subject to the Privacy Act. The procedures outlined in this subpart 1212.2 apply to the following types of requests made by individuals under the Privacy Act concerning records about themselves: ( a ) To determine if information on the requester is included in a system of records;
( b ) For access to a record under 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1); and
( c ) For an accounting of disclosures of the individual's Privacy Act records under 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3).
[57 FR 4928, Feb. 11, 1992, as amended at 77 FR 60621, Oct. 4, 2012]
Editorial Note on Part 723
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 723 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 723.9 Transitional provisions. This section governs circumstances in which, as of January 1, 2017, a federally insured credit union is operating in accordance with an approved waiver from NCUA or is subject to any enforcement constraint relative to its commercial lending activities. ( a ) *Waivers.* As of January 1, 2017, any waiver approved by NCUA concerning a federally insured credit union's commercial lending activity is rendered moot except for waivers granted for borrowing relationship limits. Borrowing relationships granted a waiver will be grandfathered however the debt associated with those relationships may not be increased.
( b ) *Enforcement constraints.* Limitations or other conditions imposed on a federally insured credit union in any written directive from NCUA, including but not limited to items specified in any Document of Resolution, any published or unpublished Letter of Understanding and Agreement, Regional Director Letter, Preliminary Warning Letter, or formal enforcement action, are unaffected by the adoption of this part. Included within this paragraph are any constraints or conditions embedded within any waiver issued by NCUA. As of January 1, 2017, all such limitations or other conditions remain in place until such time as they are modified by NCUA.
Exhibit 31(b)


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO Rule 131-14(a)/15d-14(a)


             UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Gerald Couture, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  Amendment  No. 1 to quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of
PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, Inc., the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's Chief Executive Officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's Chief Executive Officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 5, 2004



/s/ Gerald Couture
-------------------
Gerald Couture,
Chief Financial Officer
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3742

To designate the United States courthouse and post office building located 

at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Luis A. Ferre 

United States Courthouse and Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2004

Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́ (for himself, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. GUTIERREZ, and Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse and post office 

building located at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto 

Rico, as the ‘‘Luis A. Ferre United States Courthouse 

and Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LUIS A. FERRE ́ UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 

4 AND POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

6 and post office building located at 93 Atocha Street in 

7 Ponce, Puerto Rico, shall be known and designated as the 
2

•HR 3742 IH 

1 ‘‘Luis A. Ferre ́ United States Courthouse and Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper or other record of the United 

5 States to the courthouse and post office building referred 

6 to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to 

7 the Luis A. Ferre ́ United States Courthouse and Post Of8 fice Building.

Æ