UTE RESERVOIR

1992 Sedimentation Study

U.S. Department of the Interior

Bureau of Redamation
7-2090 (4-81)

Bureau of Seclamation TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE

1 REPORT NO f-rMEN 8C4SS(OI C 3 RECIPIENTS CATALOG NO

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE

May 1993

6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE

Ute Reservoir 1992 Sedimentation Survey

D-5753

7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION

REPORT NO.

Ronald L. Ferrari

__________________________

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO.

Bureau of Reclamation 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO.

Denver Office

Denver CO 80225 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED

12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS

DIBR

Same

14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE

D-5753

15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

Microfiche and hard copy available at the Denver Office, Denver, Colorado. Ed: TH

16. ABSTRACT

The Bureau of Reclamation completed a survey of Ute Reservoir in November 1992. The

survey report presents the results of an investigation to monitor changes caused by sediment

accumulation in Ute Reservoir after 29.9 years of reservoir operation. The report also

describes the surveying procedures and equipment used in the 1992 investigation and provides

data for future surveys. The primary purpose of the 1992 survey was the collection of data to

compute the area-capacity relationships for operation of Ute Reservoir.

The 1992 survey determined that the reservoir has a storage capacity of 244,957 acre-feet and

a surface area of 8,047 acres at spillway crest elevation 3787.0. Since closure in December

1962, the reservoir has accumulated a volume of 27,809 acre-feet of sediment below elevation

3787.0. This volume represents a 10.2-percent loss in total capacity and an average annual

loss of 930 acre-feet for the operation period of December 1962 through November 1992.

17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS

a. DESCRIPTORS- reservoir area and capacity! sedimentationl reservoir surveys! sonar!

sediment distribution! contour area! sedimentation survey!

b. IDENTIFIERS- Ute Reservoir! New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission!

c. COSA TI FIeld/Group COWRR: SHIM:

18. DISTRIBUTiON STATEMENT 19. SECURITY CLASS 21. NO. OF PAGES

(THIS REPORt)

UNCLA$$FIED 6

20. SECURITY CLASS 22. PRICE

(THIS PA(3E(

UNCL4SSFIED
UTE RESERVOIR

1992 SEDIMENTATION SURVEY

Ute Reservoir

Owned and Operated by

New Mexico

Interstate Stream Commission

1992 Sedimentation Survey Report

prepared by

Ronald L. Ferrari

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

DIVISION OF EARTH SCIENCES

SURFACE WATER BRANCH

SEDIMENTATION SECTION

DENVER OFFICE

DENVER, COLORADO

June 1993
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Bureau of Reclamation prepared and published this report

under the supervision of Robert I. Strand, Head, Sedimentation

Section, Earth Sciences Division. The hydrographic survey was

supervised by Ronald Ferrari, Hydraulic Engineer, and assisted

by Steven Hughes, Engineer Technician, of the Denver Office.

Personnel from the New Mexico and Oklahoma Interstate Stream

Commissions assisted in the hydrographic survey. The

preliminary field work of locating and flagging the existing

sediment range end markers was performed by the New Mexico

Interstate Stream Commission. RDnald Ferrari completed the

data processing, sediment computations, area-capacity tables, and

the report. Robert I. Strand and James 0. Blanton ifi, Hydraulic

Engineer, consulted in the sediment computations and report

preparation.

Mission

The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and

protect water and related resources in an environmentally and

economically sound manner in the interest of the American public.

The information contained in this report regarding commercial products

or firms may not be used for advertising or promotional purposes and

is not to be construed as an endorsement of any product or firm by the

Bureau of Reclamation.

The information contained in this report was developed for the Bureau

of Reclamation; no warranty as to the accuracy, usefulness, or

completeness is expressed or implied.
CONTENTS

....................................................

.............................................

.......................................

...........................................

..................................................

............................................

.................................................

..........................................

..............................................

.................................................

.......................................................

...............................

...............................

....................................

..............................

.......................................

..............................

..............................

..............................

........................

..............................

................................

...................................

................................

...................................

..................................

..................................

..................................

..................................

..................................

..................................

..................................

..................................

Page

Introduction 1

Summary and Conclusions 1

Surveys 2

Survey history 2

1992 resurvey 3

Reservoir Area and Capacity 3

Development of 1992 contour areas 3

1992 revised storage capacity 4

Sediment Analyses 5

Sedimentation accumulation 5

Sediment summary 5

Reservoir Sediment Distribution 6

Longitudinal distribution 6

Lateral distribution 6

References 7

TABLES

Table

1 Reservoir sediment data summary (1 of 2) 8

1 Reservoir sediment data summary (2 of 2) 9

2 Summary of 1992 survey results 10

3 Summary of sedimentation survey results 11

FIGURES

Figure

1 Ute Reservoir location map 12

2 Ute Reservoir range location map (1 of 3) 13

3 Ute Reservoir range location map (2 of 3) 15

4 Ute Reservoir range location map (3 of 3) 17

5 Width adjustment method for revising contour areas 19

6 Area and capacity curves - Ute Reservoir 20

7 Longitudinal profile - Canadian River 21

8 Longitudinal profile,- Ute Creek 22

9 Longitudinal profile - Canadian River 23

10 Longitudinal profile - Ute Creek 24

11 Sediment Range 1 - Canadian River 25

12 Sediment Range 2 - Canadian River 26

13 Sediment Range 3 - Canadian River 27

14 Sediment Range 4 - Canadian River 28

15 Sediment Range 5 - Canadian River 29

16 Sediment Range 6 - Canadian River 30

17 Sediment Range 7 - Canadian River 31

18 Sediment Range 8 - Canadian River 32
CONTENTS -Continued

..................................

.................................

.................................

.................................

.................................

.................................

.................................

.................................

.................................

.................................

.................................

.................................

.................................

.................................

...................................

...................................

...................................

...................................

...................................

...................................

...................................

...............................

.................................

.................................

Figure

FIGURES

Page

19 Sediment Range 9 - Canadian River 33

20 Sediment Range 10 - Canadian River 34

21 Sediment Range 11 - Canadian River 35

22 Sediment Range 12 - Canadian River 36

23 Sediment Range 13 - Canadian River 37

24 Sediment Range 14 - Canadian River 38

25 Sediment Range 15 - Canadian River 39

26 Sediment Range 16 - Canadian River 40

27 Sediment Range 17 - Canadian River 41

28 Sediment Range 18 - Canadian River 42

29 Sediment Range 19 - Canadian River 43

30 Sediment Range 20 - Canadian River 44

31 Sediment Range 21 - Canadian River 45

32 Sediment Range 22 - Canadian River 46

33 Sediment Range 101 - Ute Creek 47

34 Sediment Range 102 - Ute Creek 48

35 Sediment Range 103 - Ute Creek 49

36 Sediment Range 104 - Ute Creek 50

37 Sediment Range 105 - Ute Creek 51

38 Sediment Range 106 - Ute Creek 52

39 Sediment Range 107 - Ute Creek 53

40 Sediment Range 201 - Dripping Springs 54

41 Sediment Range 301 - Carros Creek 55

42 Sediment Range 302 - Carros Creek 56

iv
INTRODUCTION

Ute Dam, located on the Canadian River in Quay County, New Mexico, is approximately 20 miles

upstream from the New Mexico - Texas state line, 2.5 miles southwest of Logan, 3.5 miles downstream

from Ute Creek, and at river mile 673.1 (fig. 1). The dam, designed and constructed by the Bechtel

Corporation for the NMISC (New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission), was completed in May 1963.

Storage began December 13, 1962. In April 1984 a modification project was completed which

constructed a labyrinth spiiway and increased the height of the dam, dike, and spilway crest.

The dam is a rolled earthfihl structure 132 feet above the Canadian River streambed. The dam crest has

a maximum elevation of 3812.0 feet mean sea level and a crest length of 2,050 feet. The structure

includes an earthen dike section on the north bank of the Canadian River with a maximum height of 38

feet and a length of 3,640 feet. A concrete labyrinth spillway section with a crest elevation of 3787.0

feet and equivalent weir length of 3,360 feet is located upstream from an 840-foot-long ogee section

between the main embankment and dike. The outlet tower, for low-flow releases, has a sill elevation of

3725.0 feet.

Ute Reservoir, which extends into San Miguel and Harding Counties, has a length of 32 miles,

summation of Canadian River and Ute Creek, and an average width of 0.55 mile at reservoir pool

elevation 3800.0. The average width is determined by dividing the surface area by the reservoir length

at elevation 3800.0. The total Canadian River and Ute Creek drainage area above the dam is 11,110

square miles, of which 3,036 square miles contribute sediment inflow. The sediment contributing area

is the total drainage area minus 1,110 square miles as identified by the USGS (U.S. Geological Survey)

as probably noncontributing, 18 square miles of Ute Reservoir area, and 6,976 square miles of

contributing drainage area above Conchas Lake dam.

At the beginning of reservoir storage in December 1962, Ute Reservoir had a calculated surface area of

8,202 acres with a capacity of 272,766 acre-feet at elevation 3787.0.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

This report presents the results of an investigation to monitor changes caused by sediment accumulations

in Ute Reservoir after 29.9 years of reservoir operations. It also describes the surveying procedures and

equipment used in the 1992 investigation and provides data for future surveys. The primary purpose of

the 1992 survey was the collection of data to compute the area-capacity relationships for operation of Ute

Reservoir.

Table 1 contains a summary of reservoir sediment data for the 1992 survey. The 1992 survey determined

that the reservoir has a storage capacity of 244,957 acre-feet and a surface area of 8,047 acres at spillway

1
crest elevation 3787.0. Since closure in December 1962, the reservoir has accumulated a volume of

27,809 acre-feet of sediment below elevation 3787.0. This volume represents a 10.2-percent loss in total

capacity and an average annual loss of 930 acre-feet for the operation period of December 1962 through

November 1992.

SURVEYS

Survey History -

The original sediment ranges were surveyed by a NMISC contractor prior to inundation of water behind

Ute Reservoir dam and are referred to as the original, or 1963, data. Figures 2 through 4 illustrate the

range line network for Ute Reservoir. The original surface areas for Ute Reservoir were determined by

planimetering topographic maps of the reservoir area developed prior to inundation. The topographic

maps have a scale of one inch equals four hundred feet with a 10-foot contour interval.

In 1975, USGS conducted a sediment resurvey of Ute Reservoir and calculated a storage capacity of

136,235 acre-feet with a surface area of 5,229 acres at elevation 3770.0. Since closure in December

1962, the reservoir had a calculated sediment volume of 21,280 acre-feet below elevation 3770.0. The

sediment volume was computed using horizontal contour areas planimetered at

5-foot contour intervals from the original reservoir topography that was revised using the 1975 survey

data. This volume represented a 13.5-percent loss in total capacity at elevation 3770.0 and an average

annual loss of 1,637 acre-feet for the 13-year operation period.

From October 1983 through March 1984 the USGS resurveyed Ute Reservoir and computed a revised

area and capacity table. This survey was conducted prior to the dam and spiiway modification, which

raised the spillway crest from elevation 3760.0 to elevation 3787.0. The survey consisted of establishing

new range end markers to replace those that would be inundated because of the increase in reservoir

water surface elevation. On most of the range lines this task included extending only one of the bench

marks because most of the original markers were established above elevation 3790.0. For two of the

range lines it included changing the alignment of the original line, but the location was in the same

general area. The survey also established additional range lines for future monitoring. Prior to this

survey the maximum reservoir water surface was elevation 3760.8, which occurred in 1982. The 1984

study calculated a storage capacity of 134,483 acre-feet and a surface area of 5,245 acres at elevation

3770.0. Since closure in December 1962, the reservoir had a calculated volume of 23,032 acre-feet of

sediment below elevation 3770.0. This volume represented a 14.6-percent loss in total capacity and an

average annual loss of around 1,097 acre-feet, below elevation 3770.0, for the 21 -year operation period

of December 1962 through December 1983.

2
1992 Resurvey

Fieldwork for the 1992 survey began in September 1992 and ended on November 20, 1992. The

preliminary field work, performed by NMISC, consisted of locating and flagging the existing sediment

range end markers and relocating the destroyed ones. The hydrographic survey was performed at

reservoir elevation 3784.26 using Reclamation's small boat bathymetric and total station survey systems.

The small boat system consisted of a sonic depth recorder and reflector prism mounted on the boat. The

distances from a known point, usually one of the range end markers, to the small boat were determined

as it proceeded along the range line by an EDM (electronic distance measuring) instrument set up on

shore aimed at the mounted reflector target. Range distances were communicated, by radio, from shore

to the boat at preselected intervals and marked on the sonar charts as the boat proceeded across the

reservoir. The boat was held on course as closely as possible by radio communication from the EDM

operator to the survey boat. This system was used to collect the data for range lines Cl through C17,

Dl, K!, and U! through U5. The data for range lines C18 through C22, Pt, U6, and U7 were collected

by a total station survey instrument and data recorder. Because the bottom at range lines C19 and C20

was too soft to cross, the elevations were measured by wading near the shore and setting the rod on top

of the delta. The top of the delta was defined as the elevation the rod first experienced resistance before

sinking. The measured elevation was then projected across to the original opposite bank of the range line

for computation purposes.

RESERVOIR AREA AND CAPACITY

Development of 1992 Contour Areas

For the purposes of the 1992 sedimentation analysis and to better represent storage changes the reservoir

was subdivided into segments using the range lines to delineate the limit of each segmental boundary.

Reclamation digitized the segmental areas of the 10-foot contours for elevations 3680.0 through 3800.0

using copies of the original one inch equals four hundred feet topographic maps provided by NMISC.

The total segmented areas for the digitized 10-foot contours compared fairly well with the original areas

and required only minor adjustments to match the original total areas.

The 1992 reservoir surface areas were computed by the width adjustment method as described by Blanton

(1982) and illustrated on figure 5. The method entails computing the new segmented contour area, A1,

between any two ranges by applying an adjustment factor to the original segmental contour area, A0. The

computed adjustment factor for each segment was the ratio of the new average width to the original

average width for both the upstream and downstream ranges at the specified contour elevation. These

calculations were computed by Reclamation's computer program RESSED. The input data included the

original and 1992 range line data along with the segmented areas for the specified contour elevation. The

program computes the 1992 surface area for each segment at the given contour elevations. A comparison

3
of simultaneous plots of original and 1992 range profiles indicated the lateral distribution of sediment at

the different measured contour elevations. Where these plots indicate changes have occurred on the side

slopes of the reservoir, a judgement decision was made to determine whether the change was caused by

survey inaccuracies or actual deposition or erosion. The adjustment factor was set to 1.0 if it was judged

the measured change was survey inaccuracy. Additional modifications to the calculated width adjustment

factor were done to better represent the contour surface area changes. Because the original topography

of Ute Reservoir had only 10-foot contours, it was decided that a better representation of the sediment

surface areas should be obtained. These sediment surface areas were developed by plotting the 1992

average bottom profile versus the original thaiweg profile and transferring the location of the 1992

contour crossing to the original topography, and digitizing the resulting sediment surface areas. This

procedure was done for all contour crossings that terminated within a segment.

The RESSED program output lists the revised areas for each segment and notes where judgement led to

overriding the adjustment factors. The output also notes where the adjustment factors were overridden

to reflect the digitized surface areas of the contours that terminated within the segments. The 1992 total

reservoir surface area at a given contour was the summation of all segmental areas at that elevation. The

1992 total area computation results are listed in column 2 of table 2.

1992 Revised Storage Capacity

The storage-elevation relationships based on the 1992 underwater survey data were developed using

Reclamation's area-capacity computer program ACAP (Reclamation, 1985). The 1992 surface areas

resulting from the RESSED computations at 10-foot contour intervals from elevation 3680.0 through

3790.0 and the original surface area at elevation 3800.0 were used as the control parameters for

computing reservoir capacity. The original surface area of 11,237.1 acres was used for the 3800.0

contour because it was judged that the reservoir has not affected this contour area. The program

computes an area at elevation increments of 0.01- to 1.0-foot by linear interpolation between the given

contour intervals. The program begins by testing the initial capacity equation over successive intervals

to ensure that the equation fits within an allowable error limit, which was set at 0.000001 for Ute

Reservoir. This capacity equation is then used over the full range of intervals fitting within this allowable

error limit. For the first interval at which the initial allowable error limit is exceeded, a new capacity

equation (integrated from basic area curve over that interval) begins testing the fit until it also exceeds

the error limit. Thus, the capacity curve is defined by a series of curves, each fitting a certain region

of data. Final area equations are derived by differentiating the capacity equations, which are of second

order polynomial form:

4
y = a1 + a2x + a3x2

where:

y = capacity,

x = elevation above a reference base,

a1 = intercept, and

a2 and a3 = coefficients

Results of the 1992 Ute Reservoir area and capacity computations are listed in table 1 and table 2, and

plotted on figure 6. A separate set of 1992 area and capacity tables will be published for the 0.01-, 0.1-,

and 1-foot elevation increments. The 1992 area and capacity computations results are listed in columns

(4) and (5) of table 2. Column 2 in the table gives the original measured contour areas used in the

original area and capacity computation and column 3 gives the original capacity computed by ACAP.

Both the original and 1992 area and capacity curves are plotted on figure 6 for a visual comparison of

changes. The 1992 survey determined that the reservoir has a storage capacity of 244,957 acre-feet and

a surface area of 8,047 acres at spiiway crest elevation 3787.0.

SEDIMENT ANALYSES

Sedimentation accumulation

Sediments have accumulated in Ute Reservoir to a total volume of 27,809 acre-feet below elevation

3787.0, spiliway crest, since storage began in December 1962. This volume represents a 10.2-percent

loss in total capacity and an average annual accumulation rate of 930 acre-feet for the 29.9-year period

of operation. The net sediment accumulation rate from the contributing basin was 0.306 acre-feet per

square mile per year for the same period. The measured annual inflow rate is about 36 percent of the

original estimate of 2,590 acre-feet for runoff conditions experienced prior to 1962. The original estimate

was based upon computed yield rates for Pajarito Creek, Ute Creek, and the Canadian River.

The estimated average annual water inflow into Ute Reservoir for the years 1963 through 1989 was

49,614 acre-feet, see table 1 (Reclamation, 1992). This estimate represents about 27 percent of the

historical flow of the Canadian River at the USGS stream-gauging station at Logan, New Mexico, which

is located immediately downstream from Ute Dam. This gauge measured 100 percent of the historical

inflow to the reservoir, which was 186,100 acre-feet per year for the period of 1935 through 1962.

5
Sedimentation Summary

The results of the sediment data and volume computations for the 1992 survey are shown in table 1 and

table 2. The data include a tabulation of incremental sediment inflow volume and sediment accumulation

computed for the period between initial conditions and the 1992 resurvey. Table 1 includes information

on the drainage basin, records of estimated inflow, reservoir operations, and reservoir storage.

Table 3 compares the area and capacity results of the original versus the 1975, 1984, and 1992 surveys.

The 1975 and 1984 surveys were accomplished by the USGS prior to the spillway modification. The

maximum reservoir water surface for the operation period of these studies was elevation 3760.8, which

occurred in 1982. This table is given for comparison purposes only because a description of the 1975

and 1984 sediment study analysis on how their areas were calculated was not available. The original and

1992 capacity values were computed by Reclamation's program ACAP using the measured surface areas.

The 1975 and 1984 values were computed by a different program and are slightly higher than the ACAP

results using the same surface area input. The last column gives the unadjusted total segment areas that

were digitized by Reclamation from the original topographic maps, as described in the development of

1992 contour areas section. For the 1992 sediment analysis, adjustment factors were applied to the

digitized segmental areas to make them equal to the original total areas listed in column 2. Reclamation's

width adjustment method uses the original areas that developed the original area-capacity table.

RESERVOIR SEDIMENT DISTRIBUTION

Longitudinal Distribution

The distribution of sediment throughout the length of the reservoir is illustrated by plots of the thalweg

profile representing the original and 1992 resurveyed profiles for the Canadian River and Ute Creek as

shown on figures 7 and 8. The distribution of sediment is also illustrated by plots of the thalweg profiles

of the original, 1975, 1984, and 1992 resurveyed profiles for the Canadian River and Ute Creek as shown

on figures 9 and 10. Thalweg elevations representing original and the resurveyed reservoir conditions

were taken from the 1992 survey notes and large scale plots of the 1975 and 1984 range line data.

Except for the possibility of some missed low points, the plotted profile should closely resemble actual

channel bottom conditions during the original range survey completed prior to inundation of the reservoir.

Except for some minor inaccuracies in sounding and being slightly off line, the bottom of the 1975, 1984,

and 1992 profiles should closely represent channel bottom conditions at the time of those resurveys. The

channel distance used for range line location is the original river channel distance from the dam to each

range line in an upstream direction on the Canadian River and from the confluence to each range line in

an upstream direction on Ute Creek.

6
Lateral Distribution

For this study, the 1963 range line data were determined using several sources because the original survey

notes or coordinate data were not available. A 1983 sediment projection study by Reclamation determined

the distance versus elevation for many of the original range lines by digitizing large scale plots of the original

range lines provided by NMISC. Plots from the USGS 1984 sediment resurvey were used to modify the 1963

data files because the length and alignment of some of the ranges were affected. Those portions of the range

lines surveyed for the first time in 1984 were imported into the 1963 data files to be used in measuring

changes caused by sediment deposition. Some major changes were made to the 1963 data files for range lines

C4 and ClO along with some minor changes to a few other sections. NMISC provided large scale range line

plots which included superimposed data from the 1963, 1975, and 1984 surveys. Examination of these plots

along with the 1992 survey plots suggested that the 1963 data had a bust in the plotted data for sections C4

and ClO. This theory was supported by the one inch equals four hundred feet topography maps of the

reservoir area. The range lines were plotted by Reclamation from left to right bank looking downstream.

Ground profiles for the 32 original sediment ranges are shown on figures 11 through 42. The 1992 range

profile data is superimposed on these plots to indicate the changes which have occurred and to represent in

general the lateral distribution of sediment within the reservoir from elevation 3800.0 and below. A 1992

survey was not accomplished for range lines P1 because of destroyed monuments and time restraints. The

1992 survey did get some elevation shots of the creek channel of P1, which indicated no change since 1963.

No resurvey was done for the range lines located upstream from C22 and U7 because they were located above

elevation 3800.0 and it was judged that no reservoir deposition had occurred above that elevation.

Modifications were done to the 1963 and 1992 survey cross section data for input into Reclamation's

computer program used for sediment analysis. These modifications included changing the cross section labels

for each range line; that is, Cl through C22 became 1 through 22, Dl became 201, Ki and K2 became 301

and 302, and Ui through U7 became 101 through 107. Modification to the 1992 data included shifting

stations slightly to better align features and removing measured data that was not actual sediment build up.

For sediment computation purposes, a complete section was needed for all ranges. For this reason, the

original data was inserted into the 1992 data file to complete the areas not surveyed in 1992.

REFERENCES

Blanton, James 0. ifi, Procedures for Monitoring Reservoir Sedimentation: Technical Guideline, Bureau

of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado, 1982.

Bureau of Reclamation, A CAP85 User's Manual, Denver Office, Denver, Colorado, 1985.

Bureau of Reclamation, Surface Water Supply Technical Memorandwn, Eastern New Mexico Water Supply

Project, Denver Office, Denver, Colorado, September 1992.

7
RESERVOIR SEDIMENT

DATA SUMHARY Ute Reservoir

NAME OF RESERVOIR .1

DATA SHEET NO.

1. OWNER Interstat. Stream Cocxr&ission 2. STREAM Canadian River 3. STATE New Mexico

A 4. SEC. 21 TWP. 13N RANGE 33E 5. NEAREST P.O. Logan 6. COUNTY Quay

M 7. LAT 35 20' 35" LONG 103 26' 37" 8. TOP OF DAM ELEVATION 3812.01 9. SPILLWAY CREST EL. 3787.02

T 10. STORAGE 11. ELEVATION 2. ORIGINAL 13. ORIGINAL 4. GROSS STORAGE 15. DATE

E ALLOCATION TOP OF POOL SURIACE AREA, Ac CAPACITY, Al ACRE- FEET STORAGE

BEGAN

a. FLOOD CONTROL

R

V

b. MULTIPLE USE

12/13/62

O

c. POWER

I

R

d. WATER SUPPLY 3787.0 8,202 222,900 272,766 16. DATE

C.

________________ ________________

NORMAL

OPERATION

f. CONSERVATION 3741.6' 2,376

______________

29,158

________________

49,866 BEGAN

g. INACTIVE 3725.0' 1,238 20,708 20,708 5/1963

17. LENGTh OF RESEROOIR 32' MILES AVG. WIDTH OF RE., RVOIR 0. 55 MILES

18. TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA 11,140 SQUARZ MILES 22. MEAN ANNUAL PRECIPITATION INCHES

A

19. NET SEDIMENT CONTRIBUTING AREA 3,0411 SQUARE MILES 23. MEAN ANNUAL RUNOFF 0.084 INCHES

20. LENGTH MILES AV. WIDTH MILES 24. MEAN ANNUAL RUNOFF 49,614' ACRE-FEET

21. MAX. ELEVATION MIN. ELEVATION 25. ANNUAL T4P. MEAN F RANGE 'F to F

26. DATE OF 27. 28. 29. TYPE OF 30. NO. üi 31. SURFACE 32. CAPACITY 33. C/I

U SURVEY PER. ACCL. SURVEY RANGES OR AREA, AC. ACRE-FEET RATIO Al/Al

R YRS. YRS. INTERVAL

V

E

12/62 Contour CD) 10-ft 8,202' 272,766' 5.50

Y

0

11/92 29.9 29.9 Range CD) 32 8,047' 244,957' 4.94

A

A

26. DATE OF 34. PERIOD 35. PERIOD WATER INFLOW, ACRE FEET WATER INFLOW TO DATE, Al

SURVEY ANNUAL

?RECIP.

a. MEAN ANN. b. MAX. ANN. c. TOTAL a, MEAN ANN. b. TOTAL

11/92 49,614' 238,196' 1,339,591' 49,614' 1,339,591'

26. DATE OF 37. PERIOD CAPACITY LOSS, ACRE-FEET 38. TOTAL SEDIMENT DEPOSITS TO DATE, Al

SURVEY

a. TOTAL b. AV. ANN. c. /MI.2-YR. a. TOTAL b. AV. ANNUAL c. /MI.2-YR.

11/92 27,809 930 0.306 27,809 930 0.306

26. DATE OF 39. AV. DRY 40. SED. DEP. TONSfMI.2-YR. 41. STORAGE LOSS, POT. 42. SEDIMENT

SURVEY WI. (#/F) INFLOW, PPM

a. PERIOD b. TOTAL TO a. AV. b. TOTAL TO a. b.

DATE ANNUAL DATE PER. TOT.

11/92 0.341b0 10.2010

26. 43. DEPTH DESIGNATION RANGE IN FEET BELOW CREST ELEVATION 3787.0

DATE

OF 109.0- 87.0- 77.0- 67.0- 57.0- 47.0- 37.0- 27.0- 17.0- 7.0-

SURVEY 87.0 77.0 67.0 57.0 47.0 37.0 27.0 17.0 7.0 Crest

PERCENT OF TOTAL SEDIMENT LOCATED WITHIN DEPTH DESIGNATION

11/92 10.0 13.6 9.1 6.4 9.5 11.9 14.4 12.4 8.0 4.7

26. 44. REACH DESIGNATION PERCENT OF TOTAL ORIGINAL LENGTH OF RESERVOIR

DATE 0-10 10- 20- 30- 40- 50- 60- 70- 80- 90- 100- 105- 110- 115- 120-

SURVEY 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 105 110 113 120 125

________

PERCENT OF TOTAL SEDIMENT LOCATED WITHIN REACH DESIGNATION

N/A

Table 1. - Reservoir sediment data summary (page 1 of 2).
45. RANGE IN RESERVOIR OPERATION

YEAR MAX. ELEV.' MIN. ELEV." INFLOW • AF YEAR MAX. ELEV. MIN. ELEV. INFLOW, AF

1963 3728.6 3701.6 28,606 1964 3733.0 3726.5 14,613

1965 3759.9 3731.2 102,302 1966 3760.1 3753.0 41,210

1967 3760.0 3756.5 68,324 1968 3757.5 3755.3 17,810

1969 3760.1 3755.6 127,376 1970 3758.4 3756.1 17,085

1971 3757.4 3755,5 39,364 1972 3760.0 3755.0 74,356

1973 3758.2 3756.0 13,304 1974 3756.2 3753.7 9,325

1975 3755.8 3753.9 16,376 1976 3755.3 3753.2 19,281

1977 3758.6 3753.8 45,230 1978 3756.6 3754.6 16,809

1979 3760.1 3755.8 32,936 1980 3756.8 3753.6 20,027

1981 3759.6 3753.0 82,189 1982 3760.8 3743.6 117,659

1983 3742.6 3739.6 14,050 1984 3745.0 3739.4 18,329

1985 3748.7 3745.1 43,046 1986 3764.9 3756.1 45,926

1987 3787.2 3765.3 238,196 1988 3786.0 3783.9 35,906

1989 3786.2 3783.3 39,956 1990 3784.8 3782.4 -

199l' 3786.0 3783.7 - 1992 - - -

46. ELEVATIOn - AREA - CAPACITY DATA FOR C. .IGINAL CAPACITI

ELEV. AREA CAP. ELEV. ' A - CAP. ELEV. AREA CAP.

3678 0 0 3680 6 6 3690 140 608

3700 322 2,789 3710 590 7,352 3720 975 15,177

3725 1,238 20,708 3730 1,500 27,552 3740 2,226 46,185

3741.6 2,376 29,158 3750 3,162 73,124 3760 4,131 109,588

3770 5,454 157,515 3780 6,973 219,652 3787 8,202 272,766

3790 8,729 298,164 3800 11,237 397,996

46. ELEVATQN - AREA - ( SPACITY DATA FoR 1992 CAPa j.Ty

ELEV. AREA CAP. ELEV. AREA

__________

CAP. ELEV. AREA CAP.

3703.3 0 0 3710 239 801 3720 818 6,086

3725 1,058 10,777 3730 1,299 16,670 3740 1,904 32,682

3741.6 2,051 35,846 3750 2,823 56,310 3760 3,669 88,764

3770 5,224 133,229 3780 6,758 193,141 3787 8,047 244,957

3790 8,599 269,925 3800 11,237 369,106

47. REMARKS AND REFERENCES

Original dam height, prior to 1984 construction, was elevation 3801.0.

2

Crest elevation of labyrinth spillway completed in April 1984. Original spillway crest elevation 3760 .0.

Design capacity elevations raised after labyrinth spillway completion in 1984.

This elevation is for an inactive pool for fish and wildlife purposes established by agreement between the New

Mexico Interstate Stream Coosnission and the New Mexico State Game Coninission.

Elevation established by sill of outlet works.

6 Total length includes 24 miles of Canadian River and 8 miles of Ut. Creek.

Represents noncontributing area of 1,110 mi.2, reservoir area of 13 mi.2, and contributing drainage area above

Conchas Lake of 6,976 mi2.

*

Estimated annual inflow to Ute Reservoir for calendar years 1963 through 1989 (27 years). Values from Bureau of

Reclamation report dated September 1992 titled "Surface Water Supply Technical Memorandum, Eastern New

Mexico Water Supply Project."

Surface area and capacity at elevation 3787.0, spillway crest. Area and capacity calculated by Bureau of

Reclamation program ACAP.

'° Average annual and total sediment deposits divided by 272,766 acre-feet (original capacity at elevation 3787.0).

End-of-month values from USGS publications.

12 January 1991 through September 1991 data only.

48. AGENCY MAKING SURVEY Bureau of Reclamation

49, AGENCY SUPPLYING DATA Bureau of Reclamation J

DATE February 1993

Table 1. - Reservoir sediment data summary (page 2 of 2).
Table 2. - Summary of 1992 survey results.

0

(1)

ELevation

(feet)

(2)

Originat

Area

(acres)

(3)

OriginaL

Capacity

(acre-feet)

(4)

1992

Area

(acres)

(5)

1992

Capacity

(acre-feet)

(6)

Measured

Sediment

Votune

(acre-feet)

(7)

Percent

Measured

Sediment

(8)

Percent

Reservoir

Depth

3800 11,237.1 397,996 11,237.1 369,106 28,890 - -

3790 8,729.3 298,164 8,599.0 269,925 28,239 - -

3787 8,202 272,766 8,047 244,957 27,809 100.0 100.0

3780 6,973.1 219,652 6,757.9 193,141 26,511 95.3 93.6

3770 5,454.3 157,515 5,224.4 133,229 24,286 87.3 84.4

3760 4,131.1 109,588 3,668.7 88,764 20,824 74.9 75.2

3750 3,161.7 73,124 2,822.7 56,310 16,814 60.5 66.0

3740 2,226.1 46,185 1,903.6 32,682 13,503 48.6 56.9

3730 1,500.4 27,552 1,298.8 16,670 10,882 39.1 47.7

3720 974.7 15,177 818.0 6,086 9,091 32.7 38.5

3710 590.3 7,352 239.1 801 6,551 23.6 29.4

3703.3 411 3,998 0 0 3,998 14.4 23.2

3700 322.3 2,789 0 0 2,789 10.0 20.2

3690 113.9 608 0 0 608 2.2 11.0

3680 6.4 6 0 0 6 0.02 1.8

3678 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

(1) ELevation of reservoir water surface.

(2) OriginaL reservoir surface area.

(3) OriginaL caLcuLated reservoir capacity conuted using ACAP from originaL measured surface areas.

(4) Reservoir surface area from 1992 survey.

(5) 1992 caLcuLated reservoir capacity co.rçuted using ACAP from 1992 surface areas.

(6) Measured sediment votune = coLuiwi (3) - cotuin (5).

(7) Measured sediment expressed in percentage of total sediment (27,809).

(8) Depth of reservoir expressed in percentage of totaL depth (109 feet).
Table 3. - Summary of sedimentation survey results.

Elevation

(feet)

Original'

Area

(acres)

OriginaL'

Capacity

(acre-feet)

1975*

Area

(acres)

1975*

Capacity

(acre-feet)

l984

Area

(acres)

l984

Capacity

(acre-feet)

1992'

Area

(acres)

1992'

Capacity

(acre-feet)

Digitized5

1962 Surface

Areas

(acres) ____________

3800

____________

11,237

_______________

397,996

__________

-

_____________

-

___________

11,112

______________

368263

___________

11,237

______________

369,106 11,060

3790 8,729 298,164 - - 8,428 271,174 8,599 269,925 8,629

3787 8,202 272,766 - - 7,947 246,617 8,047 244,957 -

3780 6,973 219,652 - - 6,834 194,882 6,758 193,141 6,806

3770 5,454 157,515 5,229 136,235 5,245 134,483 5,224 133,229 5,257

3760 4,131 109,588 3,842 90,470 3,821 89,574 3,669 88,764 4,067

3750 3,161 73,124 2,820 58,044 2,833 56,305 2,823 56,310 3,077

3740 2,226 46,185 1,928 34,351 1,854 32,959 1,904 32,682 2,182

3730 1,500 27,552 1,332 18,545 1,361 16,958 1,299 16,670 1,456

3720 975 15,177 852 7,855 850 6,111 818 6,086 947

- 3710 590 7,352 288 2,960 264 1,258 239 801 606

3703.3 411 3,998 167 839 0 0 0 0 -

3700 322 2,789 0 0 0 0 0 0 313

3690 114 608 0 0 0 0 0 0 108

3680 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

3678 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Area and capacity values from table dated 12/5/63. Area and capacity co,ç,uted by RecLamation's area-capacity program ACAP.

Area and capacity values from table dated Dec. - Jan 1975-76. Area and capacity not copputed by ACAP.

Area and capacity values from table dated 1/1/84. Area and capacity not copputed by ACAP.

Area and capacity values from table dated 11/92. Area and capacity corçuted by ACAP.

Total of segmental surface areas digitized by Reclamation for the 1992 lJte Reservoir sedimentation study from the original

topographic maps. For the 1992 sednent analysis en adjustment factor was applied for the digitized surface area vaLue to

equal the original surface areas listed in co(tew 2.
0

in

Figure 1. - Ute Reservoir location map.

12
)

5

V/7 --

+

4- +

cc cs-'

:

A

000 f 4

:

1⁄4- r' . -- .-

,

)

I

(i çs

F

TEN A IV CcA IC

I .

5

1 -

CF UTE DM LOGAN

:

*

w

I -

t - -

-

I

I

I:

I(

-,

:i

-

/ /

f(1 )4 I

;)

h.' - -. f_

t5Gr

\F 4/

f- -

-I 9OO

K' ( ,." -

,f( jI'

/

•'f" 'cJ ;

I :.::

-

-

4.

tpoo (P00 0

w

Figure 2. - Ute Reservoir range location maps

13
+ -f

+

+ sin is

+

Pc

+

.ftO.OOO

4

+ + +

I +

is.••

sin IC

+

Ii 55i': I I

tpoo poo 0 tPOO

*C*LE is FEEt

./ I

)

-

! -1-i,-'.

/4/

'isi' L

+ +

+ +

+

-I-

+

I. ll$OOO

+ i.uo.000

+

- i.,uooo +

E

Figure 3. - Ute Reservoir range location maps

15
a

sp

•SYCM I)S4 JStlf I

t000 1.000 0 2000 v.000

$C*LL iØ FELT

NDlIO.W

•4•f4• Ma. •aStf I

Figure 4. - Ute Re.ervoir range location maj

17
WIDTH ADJUSTMENT METHOD FOR REV/SING

CON TOUR AREAS IN CO4VPU TAT/ON OP

RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION

Sediment

Scheme tic Segment

of Reservoir

In/tie! Survey

Contour Areo

Downstream Width

(/pstreom Width

New Survey

4, Contour 4reo (Computed)

Downstream Width

Upstream Width

w,,*w,ll

41z40( W0'1LW011 )

2

Figure 5. - Width adjustment method for revising contour areas.

19

Sediment Ronge
pzj

P1

CD

0

m

DI

DI

C)

D1ti

DI

C)

P...

rt

'4

C)

P1

4

CD

PD

ID

ID

PD

ID

P1

4

0

P1

3800

3790

3780

3770

3760

3750

U

3740

z

0

3730

>

El 3720

U

3710

3700

3690

3680

3670

AREA (100 ACRES)

120 H O 100 90 80 7 11) 60 50 4 0 30 20 1 11) U

/

/

'

/ /

. CAPAC ITY -_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ -AREA

I

- _______________ _______________ -

LEGEND H\ç

1992 SURVEY 'I

I ___________________________________________ I

____ ____

1%3 (ORIGINAL) SURVEY ____ ___ ___ ____ ____ ____

O 40 80 120 160 201) 240 260 320 361) 411

CAPACITY (1000 ACRE-FEET)

0
UTE RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION SURVEY

0

'.4

0

I-..

0

0

C)

'U

'U

'U

0

3800

3780

ti•:i 3760

w

z

z

O 3740

-j

3720

3700

I I

I I I I

-

- A,. CANADIAN RIVER

A

I-

-

coN

-

-

-

1

0

1

\/-i992ThaIweg

1963 Thalweg

C)

-

LI)

0 C')

0 c

I t I i I I I I II

25 20 15 10 5

MILES ABOVE AXIS OF DAM

0
I-..

P1m

cr

0

rt

I-..

P1

0

P.-.

P1

0

3800

3780

t 3760

w

LL

z

z

Q 3740

3720

3700

UTE RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION SURVEY

I

I

I

I I I I I I I I I I I

I

I I I

UTE CREEK

-

_-1992ThaIweg

- 1963 Thaweg ----

- -

F.- If) C') CJ -

I I I I I I I I I ili I I I i III I

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

MILES ABOVE AXIS OF DAM
P1

w

0

P...

rt

P...

C3

P...

m

a.

I...

P...

P1

3800

3780

3760

w

U3740

z

0

3720

3700

3680

UTE RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION SURVEYS

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

CANADIAN RIVER

1983 Thalweg

1963 Thalweg

-

(D

_ 1975 ThalwegC.) F'- to ' c'

25 20 15 10

MILES ABOVE AXIS OF DAM

5 0
UTE RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION SURVEY

I.e.

tlm

0

0

tO

rt

C

0.

P1

0

Pt,

I-..

0

ft

0

0

3800

3780

Iii 3760

w

Uz

z

Q 3740

3720

3700

3680

I I I I I I I I I I

I

UTE CREEK

1983Thaeg

i992Thaeg

1975 Thaeg - -

1963 Thalweg -

I I I II I I I

8 7 6 5 4 3 2

MILES ABOVE AXIS OF DAM

0
-------

C

1

0

I-.

va

m

010

rt

m

(1

P1

p...

p...

0

P1

3820

3800

3780

IUi

UJ

3760

z

0

3740

3720

3700

3680

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 1

1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

I

I

*

________________________ ________________________ ________________________ _______________________ ________________________

I

-

500 10 00 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 50 00 5500 60C

DISTANCE - FEET

0
02-01-299 3 13: 21; 20 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSVS VER I PSPLT : ute63'nb PLOT 2

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 2

________ 1963 SURVEY ------- 1992 SURVEY

3820

3800

m

3780 _____

Iw

Q W

pS.) 3760

0

0

'a _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____

0 .<

_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____

>

w

w

3720

a.

3700

0

1

3680 30

OISTANCE - FEET

//

L.7

D 500 10 00 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 50 00 5500 6000 6500 70
-------

02-01-1993 13:21:27 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS VER I PSPLT a:ute53mb PLOT 3

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 3

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3820

3800

P1

3780

I0.

w

P) U.

m 3760 ________ ____

Ct

____ ____ ____ ____ ________ ____

z

) 0

I-I

3740

>

I LAJ

-J

Lii

3720

3700

P1

3680

-

DISTANCE - FEET

I

) 50 0 10 00 15 00 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 50(
-------

pj

P1

0

0

0

rt

0

'U

'U

'U

I-i.

0

P1

3820

3800

3780

w

w

3760

z

0

3740

3720

3700

3680

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 4

_______ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

I

0 20 0 40 0 600 80 0 f 0 00 1200 14 00 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 30(

DISTANCE - FEET
02-01-1993 13; 22; 12 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLISYS VER I PSPLT : uteb3mb

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 5

________ 1963 SURVEY ------- 1992 SURVEY

3640 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

ITj

3820 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

P1

I-.

U'

3800 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

v

m

Q. LU

Ui

m 3780 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

çP I

z

0

3760

U'

>

___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

I U_i

-J

u_i

-_ - - - -

3740 ______ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

3720

P1

___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

3700 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 40C 0

DISTANCE - FEET
UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 6

-------

-

IP1

ID

(I.

m

OlD

ID

a'

I.

4

ID

P1

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3840

3820 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

1

3800

1-

w

w

IL 3780

z

_ _ _

I-I

9

3760

>

w

-J

w /

3740

3720 -

3700o 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 40C

DISTANCE - FEET
3840

3820

P1

w

• 3800

F- ab" W

IL 3780

v

Qb

I-I

ID 3760

-J >

Lu

-j

Lu

3740

I...

3720

P1

-------

--

3700

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 7

1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

-

.\t__

500 10 00 1500 20 00 2500 30 00 3500 40 00 4500 50 00 55(

DISTANCE - FEET
02-01-1993 13; 22; 27 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS YEA I PSPLT e; uteb3mb PLOT 15

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 8

________ 1963 SURVEY ------- 1992 SURVEY

3820

3810

I-..

3800

I-.

3790

O W

W

Ii 3780

m -.

r I

Z 3770

0

m

'-4

3760

I W

-J

3750

0.

3740

0

'1

• 3730

3720

- DO

DISTANCE - FEET

__________ K

0 200 40 0 600 800 1000 12 00 14 00 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 281
1 I

*

-------

02-01-1993 13: 22: 33 5URAU OF !ECLAHATION PLTSYS VA I PSPLT a: ute63b PLOT 17

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 9

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3810

3800

I.-

P1

3790

3780

0. Ui

Ui

(4 U...

3770

z

0

I-I

_________ _________ _________ 0 - 3760 _________ _________ _________

I W

-J

Ui 3750

DI

0.

P...

OP

3740

I-"

0 _______

3730

3720

- - - )0

DISTANCE - FEET

N _

) 50 0 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 40(
02-01-199 3 13: 22: 37 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS YEA 1 PSPLT : ute63mb PLOT 18

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION iO

________ 1963 SURVEY ------- 192 SURVEY

3810

3800

tl

9 3790

(n

3780

(.3

Li.

3770

-.o

<

>

W 3760

-J

3750

3740

3730 )O

DISTANCE - FEET

D 20 0 400 60 0 800 10 00 12 00 14 00 1600 1800 20(
-------

()

C,'

-

• I

I

13; 22: 42 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS VER I PSPLT a:uteb3mb

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION ii

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3860 __________ __________ __________ __________ __________

3840 __________ __________ __________ __________

3820 __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________

w

3800 __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________

z

0

3780 - ________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________

U-i

-J

Ui

3760 - -. _________ _________ _________ _________

3740 _________

1

3720o 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 18C

ph

P1

P.-,

m

tD

Ct

0

'-I

C)

'-I-

•10

P1

'0

OISTANCE - FEET
UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 12

1963 SURVEY ------- 1992 SURVEY

I

U..'

tD

a) 0

ft

0

p')

0

0'

0'

I-..

0

II

3860

3840

3820

tJ

LiJ

Li

3800

w 3780

3760

3740

• Th

D 200 40

_0 600 800 1000

_1200_14 00

_16

DISTANCE - FEET
-------

-----

02-01-199 3 13: 22:50 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS VER I PSPLT e:ute63mb PLOT 2

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION i3

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3860 __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________

3840 __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ _________

3820 __________ __________ __________ __________ _________

O

w

m IL

rt

3800 _________

m

_________ _________ _________ _________ _________

'-, >

-J

W 3780 _________ _________ _________ _________ _________

Q.

3760 _________ _________ _________ _________ _________

Pt

3740

C

__________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________

__J0

DISTANCE - FEET

- - - S - -

- -

200 400 600 800 1000 12 00 14 00 1600 feC
UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 14

-------

---

pz,

P1

0

P..)

Va

0

0.

co0

0

0

0.

P...

0'

.4

rn

P1

_______ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3830

3820

3810

ft 3800

IL

3790

P-I

>

w 3780 - ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______

-j

w

377O -

-

3760

375oo 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 13( 10

DISTANCE - FEET
-------

1

ID

I-fl

('3

ID

CD

g1

ID

I-'

(71

C)

DI

-

ID

P1

3830

3820

3810

uJ

w

Li 3800

z

0

3790

3780

3770

3760

t

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 15

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

- - -. - -

) 100 20 0 30 0 400 500 60 0 700 80 0 900 10 00 11 00 1200 13(

DISTANCE - FEET

0
02-01-199 13: 23:05 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS YEA I PSPLT e;ute63mb PLOT 25

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 16

________ 1963 SURVEY ------- 1992 SURVEY

3830

j

3820

3810

tn

0 I0.

Ui

o

3800

rt

Z

0

3790

3780

0.

DI

3770

II

3760 )O

DISTANCE - FEET

-

_-.-.__ ,'II

) 10 0 200 30 0 40 0 500 60 0 700 800 90 0 1000 11 00 12 00 13
-O1-1S93 13: 23: 10 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS YEA I PSPLT ; ute63mb

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 17

________ 1963 SURVEY ------- 1992 SURVEY

3830 _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ ______ _______ _______

ITJ

3820 ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______

P1

p'.)

-4

3810 _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____

(D Iiii

Ui

m Li_ 3800 _______ _______ _______

______ ______ _____ _____ _____ _____ ______ ______ _____ \

0

a 1-4

ID

1- 3790

/

-4 >

ILl

C) LU

0.

3780 - ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

I-..

--

1-

3770 - ______ ______ ______ ______ ID ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______

P1

376o o 10 0 200 30 0 40 0 500 600 700 800 90 0 10 00 11 00 1200 13C 0

DISTANCE - FEET
02-01-199 3 13: 23: 24 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSY S VER 1 PSPLT : ute63b PLOT 30

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECT ION 18

________ 1963 SURVEY - ------ 1992 SURVEY

3820

PzJ

3810

m

ILl

3800

3790

U

ri U

0.

I-.

0'

3780

I0

II ________

3770

Do

DISTANCE - FEET

V

V

_________

I

/

D 200 40 0 60 0 800 1000 1200 14 00 1600 1800 2000 2200 24
-------

pyny yr NLPA!U! u, UiiJ

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 19

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3870

ph 3860

3850

0

I 384 0

m

UJ

LU 3830 c)m U..

(t

Z 3820

: 0

Q *-4

II-.

o > 3810 _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____

LU

3800

3790 - - ____

- -

__________ ______

3780 -

3770w 50 0 10 00 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 40 00

DISTANCE - FEET
02-01-1993 13: 23:34 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS YEA j PSPLT o;ute63mb PLOT 32

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 20

________ 1963 SURVEY ------- 1992 SURVEY

3870

3860

p...

1

3850

0

3840

w

w

U..

3830

3820

i'.)

o

•<

>

w

-J ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

W 3810

0.

p...

3800

zj

p...

____ ____ ____

_____ _____

3790

3780

DISTANCE - FEET

--

D 200 40 0 600 800 10 00 1200 14 00 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 30 00 3200 34(
-------

WUHAU ur 1!..LAMAIW IT VCN I

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 21

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3870

3860 xj

P1

0

_________ 3850 _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________

3840

p.-. W

IL

0

38 30 ____________________ ____

çt

z

p

0 I- 3820

p.J >

Lu

I-J

Lu 3810 ___________

0.

I.- 3800

t1

O

4

3790 \ .

3780ü 200 400 60 0 800 10 00 1200 1400 16 00 1800 2000 2200

DISTANCE - FEET
02-01-199 3 13: 23: 44 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS VER 1 PSPLT a: ute63mb PLOT 34

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 22

________ 1963 SURVEY ------- 1992 SURVEY

3870

3860

3850

3840

Q W

3830

O ID

çt I

Z 3820

0

ID I-

> 38 1 0

I

w

J

C)

3800

3790

3780

3770(

- -- --

OISTANCE - FEET

___ 1

II

II

____

_________________

_____

_________________ I----

_______________

I

____ ____ ____

_________________

____

____ ____

I

I

_________________

____

_________________

____

_________________ _________________

____

_________________

____

_________________

____

_________________

____

) 200 400 60 0 80 0 10 00 1200 14 00 1600 18 00 2000 22(
-------

I-.-

P1

Cl)

0

0

0

0

ft

0

C)

II

ID

0

3820

3800

3780

LU

LU

IL

3760

LU 3740

3720

3700(

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 101

1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

____________ ____________ /

\

____________ ____________

/-

____________

. /

200 400 60 0 80 0 100 0 1200 140 0 1600 1800 2000 220

OISTANCE - FEET

0
UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 102

-------

Izj

II

a'

a'

a'

çt

a'

I-.

0

C

(1

a'

a'

a'

1992 SURVEY _______ 1963 SURVEY

3840

3820

3800

w

w

L.

3780 ________ _______

I-

>

uJ

-J _______ _______ _______ _______ ______ _____ w 3760

3740 __

___

___

_ _

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

DISTANCE - FEET
-------

-

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 103

_______ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3810

3800

3770 _________ /(

3760 -

\

3750 -\-----

3740

373O 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

DISTANCE - FEET
-------

0

-

-------

1

m

0

c*.

ID

ID

ID

3820

3810

3800

ILU

LU

IL 3790

z

0

3780

3770

3760

3750

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 104

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

- - - -

--

-- -

-- - - -- --

-

I

-_11.:LI *

0 1 00 200 300 40 0 500 600 700 800 900 10 00 11(

DISTANCE - FEET
-------

02-01-199 3 13: 21:55 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS VER I PSPLT :ute63mb PLOT 9

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION i05

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3840

38 30

I-..

P1

G 3820

Lii 3810

ID

0.

Lii

Li

01

3800

'-4

I-.

'0

ID

,- iii 3790

o

U' W

3 7 80

0

1m

It) _______

3770

3760

-- - )0

OISTANCE - FEET

10 0 20 0 300 400 500 60 0 700 800 90 0 10(
02-01-1993 13: 21:59 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS VEA 1 PSPLT ute63inb PLOT 10

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION ±06

_______ 1963 SURVEY ------- 1992 SURVEY

3830 _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________

3820

tfl LiJ

3810

CI,

p.,) 0

ft

0

ø

,

> 3800

I.,'

-J

c

ft

0

3790

0

0

3780

OISTANCE - FEET

. II

3 10 0 200 30 0 40

_

0 500

_

60

_

0 700

_

800

_

9cJ
-------

-

O-O1-199 1; 2;O UAEAU OF RECLAMATION PLISYS VER I PSPLT p:ute63mb PLOT II

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION i07

_______ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3840

'xi

j 3830

3820

(4 •

I

0

'-4

I-

• > 3810

o

Lu

J

-4 Lu

0

3800

ID

0

3790

C - - )0

DISTANCE - FEET

/ ;-

100 200 30 0 40 0 50 0 60 0 70 0 800 90 0 1000 11 00 12(
UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 2O

-------

U'

Pt

0

0

I:

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3860

3850

3840

3830 - ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

w

w

3820

z

3810

>

ILl

-J

W 3800

3790

3780

377oo 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

DISTANCE - FEET
•1 1*

-------

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 301

________ 1963 SURVEY 1992 SURVEY

3840

3830

C

P1

0

3820

Cl) $-

a UJ 3810

. U

aia U.. 01

rt

Z 3800

0

'-I

3790

____

I U

C)

P1

'1 3780 0

C)

P1

0

0 3770 r

376oo 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 13C 0

DISTANCE - FEET
02-01-199 3 13; 23: 17 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PLTSYS VER PSPLT ; ute63mb PLOT 28

UTE RESERVOIR

GROUND PROFILE FOR SECTION 302

________ 1963 SURVEY ------- 1992 SURVEY

3830

ii 3820

t)

(a

(D I.-

w

0. _______ 3810 _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______

0) 0

rt

P1

z

Q

0

I-,

I.-

LI 3800

o

.) _J

I Lu

0

01

P1

P1

0

w

3790

0

P1

3780(

DISTANCE - FEET

) 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 55