alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*The Honorable Pasco M. Bowman stepped down as Chief Judge of the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at the end of the day on April 23, 1999.

He has been succeeded by the Honorable Roger L. Wollman.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3961

___________

Lillian Carter, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Provident Life and Accident Insurance * [UNPUBLISHED]

Company, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 23, 1999

Filed: April 28, 1999

___________

Before BOWMAN,* Chief Judge, ROSS, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Lillian Carter appeals from an adverse judgment in Carter's action brought under

the Employment Retirement Security Act to recover accidental death insurance benefits

following the death of her husband. Having reviewed the record in the context of

Carter's contentions, we conclude that no error of law appears in the district court's
-2-

ruling and that an extended discussion is unnecessary. We thus affirm for the reasons

stated in the district court's ruling. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 1204.1509 Receiving and responding to comments. ( a ) The Administrator follows the procedures in § 1204.1510 if: ( 1 ) A state office or official is designated to act as a single point of contact between a state process and all federal agencies; and
( 2 ) That office or official transmits a state process recommendation for a program selected under § 1204.1506.
( b ) ( 1 ) The single point of contact is not obligated to transmit comments from state, areawide, regional or local officials and entities where there is no state process recommendation.
( 2 ) If a state process recommendation is transmitted by a single point of contact, all comments from state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
( c ) If a state has not established a process, or is unable to submit a state process recommendation, state, areawide, regional and local officals and entities may submit comments to the Agency.
( d ) If a program or activity is not selected for a state process, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments to the Agency. In addition, if a state process recommendation for a nonselected program or activity is transmitted to the Agency by the single point of contact, the Administrator follows the procedures of § 1204.1510 of this part.
( e ) The Administrator considers comments which do not constitute a state process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for which the Administrator is not required to apply the procedures of § 1204.1510 of this part, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact, or directly to the Agency by a commenting party.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
RICARDO RAMIREZ , Petitioner

. N o . 1 CA

- CR 18

- 0059 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2008

- 155341

- 001 The Honorable Warren J. Granville , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix By Diane Meloche Counsel for Respondent

Ricardo Ramirez , Florence Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Kenton D. Jones, Judge Michael J. Brown, and Judge Jon W. Thompson delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 7-24-18STATE v. RAMIREZ Decision of the Court

2 P E R C U R I A M : ¶1 Petitioner Ricardo Ramirez seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief , filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is the petitioner’s first successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief

. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 576

- 77, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion in denying the petition. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not shown any abuse of discretion. ¶4 Accordingly, we grant review and deny re lief.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.6(j)
---------------

                  LETTER AMENDMENT TO THE REVOLVING CREDIT AND
                           LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT

Letterhead of Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Company

May 31, 2001

Mr. Lawrence Rychlak
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Environmental Elements Corporation
P. O. Box 1318
Baltimore, Maryland  21203

Dear Larry:

Reference is made to the Revolving Credit and Letter of Credit Agreement dated
November 24, 1993 as amended by and among Environmental Elements Corporation and
Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Company.  Confirming our recent telephone
conversations and electronic correspondence, the maturity date of the Agreement
is to be extended from December 31, 2001 to April 1, 2002 and the financial
covenants are to be revised as follows:

 1.  It will constitute a default if the Borrower experiences an aggregate loss
     exceeding $500,000 for the period April 1, 2001 through September 30, 2001.

 2.  It shall constitute a default if the Borrower experiences an aggregate loss
     for the period April 1, 2001 through December 1, 2001.

 3.  The Borrower must have a net pretax profit of not less than $250,000 for
     the fiscal year ending March 31, 2002.

 4.  For the purpose of calculating profitability, any write-down of the
     $1,200,000 Weldwood receivable will be excluded.

 5.  The requirement contained in Section 6.05 of the Agreement for the Borrower
     to maintain a Minimum Tangible Net Worth of $6,500,000 is to be eliminated.

By copy of this letter, I am requesting that J. Michael Brennan, Esq. draft an
amendment to the loan documentation reflecting the above terms.

Very truly yours,

Philip G. Enstice


                                      45
100 

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 

STORAGE, IN PERCENT

20 10 

0 

MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY 

MONTH 

Figure 3. Example of a typical rule curve for New Jersey. 

W A T C H 

W A R N I N G 

E M E R G E N C Y 

6
save more at the 

grocery store.

10 MyPlate tips to stretch your food dollar.

Using coupons and looking for the best price are great ways to save money at the grocery store. Knowing 

how to find them is the first step to cutting costs on food. Use the MyPlate coupon tips to stretch your budget.

10

tips

Nutrition 

Education Series

 

Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Go to www.ChooseMyPlate.gov 

for more information.

 

DG TipSheet No. 37

April 2014

United States Department of Agriculture

1 find deals right under your nose. Look for coupons with your receipt, as peel-offs on items, and on signs along aisle shelves.

2 search for coupons

Many stores still send ads and coupons for promotion, 

so don’t overlook that so-called “junk mail.” You can 

also do a Web search for “coupons.” 

Go through your coupons at least 

once a month and toss out any 

expired ones.

3look for savings in the 

newspaper. Brand name coupons are found as inserts in the paper 

every Sunday—except on holiday weekends. Some stores 

will double the value of brand name coupons on certain 

days.

4

 join your store’s loyalty program.

 Signup is usually free and you can receive savings 

and electronic coupons when you provide your email 

address.

5 buy when foods are on sale. Maximize your savings by using coupons on sale 

items. You may find huge deals such as “buy one get 

one free.” 

6 find out if the store will match 

competitors’ coupons.

Many stores will accept coupons, as long as they are 

for the same item. Check with the customer service desk for 

further details.

7 stay organized so 

coupons are easy to find

Sort your coupons either by item or in alphabetical 

order. Develop a system that’s easiest for you and make 

finding coupons quick and hassle-free. Ideas for coupon 

storage include 3-ring binders, accordion-style organizers, 

or plain envelopes.

8 find a coupon buddy. Swap coupons you won’t use with a friend. You can 

get rid of clutter and discover additional discounts. 

9 compare brands. Store brands can be less expensive than some of the name brand foods. Compare the items to find 

better prices. 

10 stick to the list. Make a shopping list for all the items you need. Keep a running 

list on your phone, on the refrigerator, or in a 

wallet. When you’re in the store, do your best 

to buy only the items on your list.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIO RENE RUBIO,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

C. M. HARRISON,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 08-55467

D.C. No. 2:05-cv-08691-ODW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 19, 2010** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Mario Rene Rubio appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

FILED

AUG 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 We certify for appeal, on our own motion, the issue of whether the 2003 1

prison disciplinary decision assessing 150 days loss of good time work credits and

90 days loss of privileges violated due process. 

2 08-55467

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we reverse and remand. 1

Rubio contends that the prison disciplinary decision, finding him guilty of

indecent exposure with a prior court conviction under California Penal Code

sections 314 or 288, was not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated

his due process rights. We remand for the district court to determine whether any

of Rubio’s prior court convictions qualify as convictions under California Penal

Code sections 314 or 288, and if so, whether some evidence supports the hearing

officer’s finding. See Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454 (1985).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Judge Reinhardt dissents.

FILED

AUG 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
§ 135.87 Carriage of cargo including carry-on baggage. No person may carry cargo, including carry-on baggage, in or on any aircraft unless— ( a ) It is carried in an approved cargo rack, bin, or compartment installed in or on the aircraft;
( b ) It is secured by an approved means; or
( c ) It is carried in accordance with each of the following: ( 1 ) For cargo, it is properly secured by a safety belt or other tie-down having enough strength to eliminate the possibility of shifting under all normally anticipated flight and ground conditions, or for carry-on baggage, it is restrained so as to prevent its movement during air turbulence.
( 2 ) It is packaged or covered to avoid possible injury to occupants.
( 3 ) It does not impose any load on seats or on the floor structure that exceeds the load limitation for those components.
( 4 ) It is not located in a position that obstructs the access to, or use of, any required emergency or regular exit, or the use of the aisle between the crew and the passenger compartment, or located in a position that obscures any passenger's view of the “seat belt” sign, “no smoking” sign, or any required exit sign, unless an auxiliary sign or other approved means for proper notification of the passengers is provided.
( 5 ) It is not carried directly above seated occupants.
( 6 ) It is stowed in compliance with this section for takeoff and landing.
( 7 ) For cargo only operations, paragraph (c)(4) of this section does not apply if the cargo is loaded so that at least one emergency or regular exit is available to provide all occupants of the aircraft a means of unobstructed exit from the aircraft if an emergency occurs.
( d ) Each passenger seat under which baggage is stowed shall be fitted with a means to prevent articles of baggage stowed under it from sliding under crash impacts severe enough to induce the ultimate inertia forces specified in the emergency landing condition regulations under which the aircraft was type certificated.
( e ) When cargo is carried in cargo compartments that are designed to require the physical entry of a crewmember to extinguish any fire that may occur during flight, the cargo must be loaded so as to allow a crewmember to effectively reach all parts of the compartment with the contents of a hand fire extinguisher.
**Exhibit      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

| (1)   | The                report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                        |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                registrant.  |

| October                30, 2006                                        |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                   |   |
|                                                                   |   |
| /s/                Jeffrey R. Immelt                                   |   |
| Jeffrey                R. ImmeltChief                Executive Officer |   |
|                                                         |   |
| /s/                Keith S. Sherin                                     |   |
| Keith                S. SherinChief                Financial Officer   |   |
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

 

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofGB&T Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory L. Hamby, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ Gregory L. Hamby                       |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Gregory L. Hamby, Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

 

March 5, 2008

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to GB&T Bancshares, Inc.and will be retained by GB&T and furnished to the SEC or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
# Official Journal L 290/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 290 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6116 November 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 290

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6116 November 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 9 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of category L2, L4 and L5 vehicles with regard to sound emission [2018/1704] | 1 |
| | * | Regulation No 63 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of L1 category vehicles with regard to sound emission [2018/1705] | 28 |
| | * | Regulation No 90 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies, drum-brake linings and discs and drums for power-driven vehicles and their trailers [2018/1706] | 54 |
| | * | Regulation No 92 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of non-original replacement exhaust silencing systems (NORESS) for vehicles of categories L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5 with regard to sound emission [2018/1707] | 162 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 9 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of category L2, L4 and L5 vehicles with regard to sound emission [2018/1704]

2

4

5

1

*

Regulation No 63 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of L1 category vehicles with regard to sound emission [2018/1705]

1

28

*

Regulation No 90 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies, drum-brake linings and discs and drums for power-driven vehicles and their trailers [2018/1706]

54

*

Regulation No 92 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of non-original replacement exhaust silencing systems (NORESS) for vehicles of categories L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5 with regard to sound emission [2018/1707]

1

2

3

4

5

162

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 212/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 212 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6122 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 212

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6122 August 2018

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and amending Regulations (EC) No 2111/2005, (EC) No 1008/2008, (EU) No 996/2010, (EU) No 376/2014 and Directives 2014/30/EU and 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 552/2004 and (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and amending Regulations (EC) No 2111/2005, (EC) No 1008/2008, (EU) No 996/2010, (EU) No 376/2014 and Directives 2014/30/EU and 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 552/2004 and (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 10.17

QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC.

Description of 2011 Cash Bonuses

After considering the contributions made
to multiple projects by Mr. Philip W. Cook and Mr. John C. Cirone during 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Quicksilver Resources Inc. approved payment of a one-time cash bonus payable on
December 30, 2011 to the following executive officers:



|               |  |        |        | 
|-------------- |  | ------ | ------ | 
|Name           |  | Amount |       
|Philip W. Cook |  | $      | 75,000 | 
|John C. Cirone |  | $      | 60,000 |
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:25 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:18:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:25 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:18:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:25 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:18:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:25 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:18:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:25 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:18:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:25 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:18:41 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 6
###### Editorial Note on Part 206

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 206 appear at 84 FR 15925, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 206.3 Transportation of newspersons by all-cargo carriers.

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 41101 and Chapter 415 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII and part 221 of this chapter, an air carrier holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity for the transportation of only property and mail may provide transportation to persons on regularly scheduled cargo flights for the purpose of collecting data for preparation of feature news, pictorial or like articles provided that the transportation is limited to the writer, journalist, or photographer engaged in the preparation of data for use in feature news, pictorial, or like articles which are to appear in newspapers or magazines, or on radio or television programs and which will publicize the regularly scheduled cargo operations of the carrier.

[Doc. No. 47939, 57 FR 40102, Sept. 2, 1992, as amended at 60 FR 43524, Aug. 22, 1995]