alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,526
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (20,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     57,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,528
<PP&E>                                         636,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                 366,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 424,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,378,894
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,879
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   424,092
<SALES>                                        153,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,586
<CGS>                                          410,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  995,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (952,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (952,186)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
terms of use privacy notice team ! " © 2022 Kroll. All rights reserved.

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

Case No. 17-03283

case info / claims

! " Page 1 of 1 # $

! " Page 1 of 1 # $

+ Case Navigation

+ Quick Links

70324 06/25/2018 Empressas Omajede Inc. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico $338,503.37

70324 advanced % &

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

PRIME CLERK IS NOW KROLL RESTRUCTURING ADMINISTRATION. ALL PRIME CLERK URLS AND EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE AUTOMATICALLY REDIRECTED. ×

MMEENNUU

CCrreeddiittoorr DDaattaa DDeettaaiillss -- CCllaaiimm ## 7700332244

CCrreeddiittoorr

Empressas Omajede Inc.

1608 Calle Bori, Suite 218

San Juan, PR 00927

DDeebbttoorr NNaammee

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

DDaattee FFiilleedd

06/25/2018

CCllaaiimm NNuummbbeerr

70324

SScchheedduullee NNuummbbeerr

n/a

Claim Amounts

Objection History

CCllaaiimm NNaattuurree SScchheedduullee AAmmoouunntt CC**UU**DD** AAsssseerrtteedd CCllaaiimm AAmmoouunntt CC**UU**FF** CCuurrrreenntt

CCllaaiimm VVaalluuee CCllaaiimm SSttaattuuss

General Unsecured $338,503.37 $338,503.37 Pending Objection

Priority

Secured

503(b)(9) Admin Priority

Admin Priority

Total $0.00 $338,503.37 $338,503.37

*C=Contingent, U=Unliquidated, D=Disputed, F=Foreign

DDaattee FFiilleedd OObbjjeeccttiioonn MMoottiioonn DDaattee FFiilleedd OObbjjeeccttiioonn OOrrddeerr BBaassiiss SSttaattuuss

08/20/2021 Debtor's Omnibus Objection to Claims , the Three ... Modified Pending

09/16/2022 Debtor's Omnibus Objection to Claims , the Five H... Deficient Pending

Kroll Restructuring Administration (formerly known as Prime Clerk) maintains this website for the public's convenience and for general informational purposes only. Anyone using this website is cautioned NOT 

to rely on any information contained on this Website, and any user of this website should not take or refrain from taking any action based upon anything included or not included on this website. We are not a 

law firm or a substitute for an attorney or law firm. Users of this website may want to seek legal counsel on the particular facts and circumstances at issue. All search results provided through this website are 

qualified in their entirety by the official register of claims and the Schedules of Assets and Liabilities ("Schedules") and Statements of Financial Affairs (“Statements”) filed in the bankruptcy case/s of the 

Debtor/s. 

Nothing contained on this Site or in the Debtors’ Schedules and Statements shall constitute an admission or a waiver of any of the Debtors’ rights to assert claims or defenses. Any failure by a Debtor to 

designate a claim listed on the Schedules as "disputed", "contingent", or "unliquidated" does not constitute an admission that such amounts are not "disputed", "contingent", or "unliquidated." For the avoidance 

CLOSE

Kroll Restructuring Administration https://cases.ra.kroll.com/puertorico/Home-ClaimInfo

1 of 1 10/16/22, 11:08 AM

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24818-2 Filed:07/31/23 Entered:07/31/23 14:18:32 Desc:

Exhibit 2 - First Amended POC Page 1 of 1
§ 141.83 Quality of training. ( a ) Each pilot school or provisional pilot school must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Comply with its approved training course; and
( 2 ) Provide training of such quality that meets the requirements of § 141.5(d) of this part.
( b ) The failure of a pilot school or provisional pilot school to maintain the quality of training specified in paragraph (a) of this section may be the basis for suspending or revoking that school's certificate.
( c ) When requested by the Administrator, a pilot school or provisional pilot school must allow the FAA to administer any knowledge test, practical test, stage check, or end-of-course test to its students.
( d ) When a stage check or end-of-course test is administered by the FAA under the provisions of paragraph (c) of this section, and the student has not completed the training course, then that test will be based on the standards prescribed in the school's approved training course.
( e ) When a practical test or knowledge test is administered by the FAA under the provisions of paragraph (c) of this section, to a student who has completed the school's training course, that test will be based upon the areas of operation approved by the Administrator.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16347, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 141-9, 62 FR 40908, July 30, 1997]
<PAGE>   1
 
                     SANCTUARY WOODS MULTIMEDIA CORPORATION
 
             EXHIBIT 11 -- COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         1995            1994            1993
                                                     ------------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>             <C>
PRIMARY NET LOSS PER SHARE
NET LOSS...........................................  $(18,698,441)    $(7,404,436)    $(4,221,569)
                                                     ============     ===========     ===========
PRIMARY SHARES OUTSTANDING:
  Common shares....................................    20,873,748      17,993,675      13,231,421
  Performance shares held in escrow................    (4,000,000)     (4,000,000)     (4,000,000)
                                                     ------------     -----------     -----------
          Total....................................    16,873,748      13,993,675       9,231,421
                                                     ============     ===========     ===========
PRIMARY NET LOSS PER SHARE.........................  $      (1.11)    $     (0.53)    $     (0.46)
                                                     ============     ===========     ===========
FULLY DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE (1)
NET LOSS...........................................  $(18,698,441)    $(7,404,436)    $(4,221,569)
                                                     ============     ===========     ===========
FULLY DILUTED SHARES OUTSTANDING:
  Common shares....................................    20,873,748      17,993,675      13,231,421
  Common stock equivalents (including stock options
     and warrants).................................       746,407         970,283       2,064,992
                                                     ------------     -----------     -----------
          Total....................................    21,620,155      18,963,958      15,296,413
                                                     ============     ===========     ===========
FULLY DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE...................  $      (0.86)    $     (0.39)    $     (0.28)
                                                     ============     ===========     ===========
</TABLE>
 
---------------
(1) Fully Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share, has been presented in accordance
    with Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(11) even though the amounts of fully diluted
    per share loss are not required to be presented in the statement of
    operations under the provisions of APB Opinion No. 15 because of
    anti-dilution.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3671

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act, as added by 

the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act 

of 2003, to permit the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

enter into direct negotiations to promote best prices for Medicare beneficiaries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2003

Mr. DEUTSCH (for himself, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Ms. CORRINE BROWN

of Florida, Mr. WEXLER, and Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act, as added by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, to permit 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to enter 

into direct negotiations to promote best prices for Medicare beneficiaries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3671 IH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS ON 

2 PRICES FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS FOR 

3 MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES. 

4 Section 1860D–11(i) of the Social Security Act, as 

5 added by section 101(a) of the Medicare Prescription 

6 Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, is 

7 amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(i) DIRECT NEGOTIATIONS.—In order to promote 

9 the best price of prescription drugs for part D eligible 

10 beneficiaries and in carrying out this part, the Secretary 

11 may enter into direct negotiations between—

12 ‘‘(1) drug manufacturers and pharmacies; and 

13 ‘‘(2) PDP sponsors and MA organizations of14 fering MA–PD plans.’’.

Æ
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE05916

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
**Exhibit 23.2**March 1, 2007To Whom It May Concern:**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**     Data & Consulting Services Division of Schlumberger Technology Corporation consents to thereferences to our firm in the form and context in which they appear in the Annual Report on Form10-K of Quicksilver Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006. Wefurther consent to the use of information contained in our reports, as of December 31, 2006, 2005and 2004, setting forth the estimates of revenues from the Company’s oil and gas reserves in suchAnnual Report on Form 10-K. We further consent to the incorporation by reference of such AnnualReport on Form 10-K into Registration Statement Nos. 333-69496, 333-89204, 333-92196 and 333-130597on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-134430, 333-94387, 333-91526, 333-113617 and333-116180 on Form S-8 of the Company.       **DATA & CONSULTING SERVICES**
§ 1261.411 Collection in installments. ( a ) Whenever feasible, and except as otherwise provided by law, debts owed to the United States, together with interest penalties, and administrative costs as required by § 1261.412, should be collected in full in one lump sum. This is true whether the debt is being collected by administrative offset or by another method, including voluntary payment. However, if the debtor is financially unable to pay the indebtedness in one lump sum, payment may be accepted in regular installments. Debtors who represent that they are unable to pay the debt in one lump sum must submit justification, including financial statements. If NASA agrees to accept payment in regular installments, it will obtain a legally enforceable written agreement from the debtor which specifies all of the terms of the arrangement and which contains a provision accelerating the debt in the event the debtor defaults. The size and frequency of installment payments should bear a reasonable relation to the size of the debt and the debtor's ability to pay. If possible, the installment payments should be sufficient in size and frequency to liquidate the Government's claim in not more than three years. Installment payments of less than $50 per month should be accepted only if justifiable on the grounds of financial hardship or similar reasonable cause. If the claim is unsecured, an executed confess-judgment note should be obtained from a debtor when the total amount of the deferred installments will exceed $750. Such notes may be sought when an unsecured obligation of a lesser amount is involved. When attempting to obtain confess-judgment notes, the debtor should be provided with written explanation of the consequences of signing the note, and documentation should be maintained sufficient to demonstrate that the debtor has signed the note knowingly and voluntarily. Security for deferred payments other than a confess-judgment note may be accepted in appropriate cases. NASA, at its option, may accept installment payments notwithstanding the refusal of a debtor to execute a confess-judgment note or to give other security.
( b ) If the debtor owes more than one debt and designates how a voluntary installment payment is to be applied as among those debts, that designation must be followed. If the debtor does not designate the application of the payment, agencies should apply payments to the various debts in accordance with the best interests of the United States, as determined by the facts and circumstances of the particular case, paying special attention to applicable statutes of limitations.
[45 FR 48104, July 18, 1980, as amended at 82 FR 29385, June 29, 2017]
# Official Journal C 218/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 218 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5916 June 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 218

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5916 June 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2016/C 218/1 | Position (EU) No 10/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union Adopted by the Council on 17 May 2016 | 1 |
| 2016/C 218/2 | Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 10/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union | 31 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2016/C 218/1

Position (EU) No 10/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union Adopted by the Council on 17 May 2016

1

2016/C 218/2

Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 10/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union

31

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
REPLEVIN.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

January Term, 1898.]

Cox, Smith aud Swing, JJ.

#### I. G. Semper v. Andrew Bentley.

Gist of Action of Replevin is Unlawful Possession. If Defendant has Disposed of Property, Conversion is the Remedy.

The gist of the action of replevin is the uulawful detention by the defendant of property, to the possession of which plaintiff is entitled, and where it appears that at the time the action was commenced, the defendant had, in good faith, disposed of the property, the action must fail. Plaintiff’s remedy in such case is for an unlawful conversion of the property. Section 5827, Rev. Stat., relating to instances where property is not taken by the officer or is returned to defendant on plaintiff’s failure to give bond, the action shall proceed as one for damages is not applicable.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

Smith, J.

We are of the opinion that the second defense interposed by the the defendant to the petition of replevin filed against him by the plaintiff, charging him with the illegal detention of a cow on which plaintiff averred he had a chattel mortgage, and to the immediate possession of which he was entitled, set up a good defense to the action, and that the court of common pleas did not err in overruling the demurrer filed thereto. The answer substantially averred that at the time the action was commenced and when summons issued, the cow in question was not actually or constructively in defendant’s possession, which fact plaintiff knew at the time he commenced his action. That if he ever had possession of the property, he had parted with the same in good faith and without any knowledge of the plaintiff’s claim thereto, long before the action was commenced,' ah of which plaintiff knew when he commenced his action.

*357
      *G. R.*Werner, for plaintiff in error.

*Gorman &*Thompson, for defendant in error.

The gist of the action of replevin, is the unlawful detention by the defendant of property to the possession of which the plaintiff is entitled. On the averments of this answer, plaintiff was not detaining the property from the defendant at all, for he had in good faith disposed of the same long before the suit was commenced, as the plaintiff well knew. His remedy, therefore, if he had any against the plaintiff, was for an unlawful conversion of his property, and not by replevin to recover the possession of it. And in our opinion, the provision of our statute, sec. 5827, that in replevin cases, where,the property is not taken by the officer, or is returned to the defendant on plaintiff’s failing to give bond, the action shall proceed as one for damages, does not apply to a case of this kind; but to one where the replevin is properly brought, and the property cannot be found, or is returned to the defendant as above stated.

The overruling of the demurrer being the only error assigned, the judgment will be affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended July 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Ryan, Chief
Executive Officer, President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




September
      14, 2010
              /s/ Christopher J. RyanChristopher
      J. RyanChief
      Executive Officer, President,Secretary
      and General Counsel
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

As representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO

Debtor1

.

BANKRUPTCY NO.: 17-03283 (LTS)

PROMESA

Title III

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING URGENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION INFORMATION REQUEST

Upon the Urgent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Alternative Dispute 

Resolution Information Request filed by Baxter Sales and Distribution Puerto Rico, Corp. [EFC 

No. ____ in Case No. 17-03283] (the “Urgent Motion”); and it appearing that no party objected to 

the relief requested in the Urgent Motion and the Court having found good cause to grant the relief 

requested by the Motion, it hereby ORDERS that:

1. The Urgent Motion is GRANTED as set forth herein.

2. The deadline for Baxter Sales and Distribution Puerto Rico, Corp. (“Baxter”) to provide 

the information requested in the Alternative Dispute Resolution Information Request

served on Baxter is hereby extended to June 23, 2023.

1 The Debtors in these title III cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number listed as a bankruptcy 

case number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); 

(ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the 

Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits 

of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 

4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24389-3 Filed:06/01/23 Entered:06/01/23 16:26:06 Desc:

Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Proposed Order Page 1 of 2
3. This Order resolves EFC No. ____ in Case No. 17-03283.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________________, 2023

San Juan, Puerto Rico

______________________________

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Court Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24389-3 Filed:06/01/23 Entered:06/01/23 16:26:06 Desc:

Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Proposed Order Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1Section 1350 CertificationsIn connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1 (the “Report”) of PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended May 31, 2006, Arnie Geller, the President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, and Stephen Couture, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, each certifies, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: October 2, 2006   /s/ Arnie Geller         Arnie Geller