alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MARY HARVEY v. GEORGE A. MORSE.1

December 8, 1916.

Nos. 20,082—(132).

New trial because of excessive damages.

Motion for new trial because of excessive damages. *Held:*The amount of the verdict was within the rule given the jury and not challenged by appellant, and the verdict was supported by evidence. [Reporter.]

Action in the district court for -Hennepin county to recover $500 for false representations in the sale of an automobile.. The case was tried before Daly, X, of the Twelfth judicial district, who when plaintiff rested denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the action, and a jury which returned a verdict for $374.75. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*F. Alexander Stewart,*for appellant.

*Mathias Baldwin,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 160 N. W. 79.

Per Curiam.

The only question involved in this appeal is whether the verdict is supported by the evidence or excessive in amount. The motion for a new trial was limited to those grounds, and the alleged errors in the admission of evidence and instructions to the jury cannot be considered. State v. District Court, 56 Minn. 56, 57 N. W. 319. The questions so presented do not require extended discussion. The charge of the court in reference to the measure of damage, by the failure of defendant to challenge it by the motion for a new trial, became the law of the case. The amount of the verdict is clearly within the limits of the rule as stated to the jury, and is not excessive. The evidence supports the verdict.

Order affirmed.
§ 121.597 Flight release authority: Supplemental operations. ( a ) No person may start a flight under a flight following system without specific authority from the person authorized by the operator to exercise operational control over the flight.
( b ) No person may start a flight unless the pilot in command or the person authorized by the operator to exercise operational control over the flight has executed a flight release setting forth the conditions under which the flights will be conducted. The pilot in command may sign the flight release only when he and the person authorized by the operator to exercise operational control believe that the flight can be made with safety.
( c ) No person may continue a flight from an intermediate airport without a new flight release if the aircraft has been on the ground more than six hours.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19222, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-3, 30 FR 3639, Mar. 19, 1965]
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00495-CR

Latara PRIESTLY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 07-1068-CR

Honorable Dwight E. Peschel, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 15, 2010

AFFIRMED

Latara Priestly pleaded guilty to three counts of forgery and was placed on three years 

deferred adjudication community supervision. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke 

Priestly’s community supervision and enter an adjudication of guilt, alleging Priestly had 

violated the terms of her community supervision by, among other things, using drugs, failing to 

report to her supervision officer, failing to maintain employment, failing to complete programs 

ordered by the court, and neglecting to pay administrative fees and court costs. After a hearing 
04-09-00495-CR

- 2 -

on the State’s motion, the trial court adjudicated Priestly guilty and sentenced her to two years 

imprisonment. We affirm.

Priestly’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of 

the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that 

the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel provided Priestly with a copy of the brief and 

informed Priestly of her right to review the record and file her own brief. See Nichols v. State, 

954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 

177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Priestly did not file a pro se brief.

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and 

without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant 

appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d 

at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Priestly wish to seek further review 

of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, she must either retain an attorney to file a 

petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition 

for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or 

the last timely motion for rehearing that was overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. 

Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be 

forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3; 68.7. Any petition 

for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10428]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Western Washington Cascades Provincial Interagency Executive 
Committee (PIEC) Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Western Washington Cascades Provincial Interagency 
Executive Committee Advisory Committee (Provincial Advisory Committee) 
will meet on Thursday, May 18, 2000, at the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie 
National Forest Headquarters, 21905 64th Avenue West, in Mountlake 
Terrace, WA. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until about 
3 p.m. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Review and discussion of 
the Finney Adaptive Management Area (AMA), (2) Formulation and 
evaluation of options for the Finney AMA, (3) Determining how to better 
utilize active watershed groups, (4) Chilliwack River Monitoring 
Project, and (5) Salmon of the Skagit River.
    In addition to the Advisory Committee meeting, a field trip for 
Advisory Committee members will take place the previous day, Wednesday, 
May 17, 2000. Members will tour portions of the Finney basin on the 
Darrington Ranger District, commencing at 9 a.m. at the Darrington 
District Office, 1405 Emens Street, Darrington, Washington, and ending 
back at the same Office about 4:30 p.m. The purpose of the trip is to 
orient Advisory Committee members to the Finney Adaptive Management 
Area issues and opportunities. All Western Washington Cascades 
Provincial Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. 
Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. Interested citizens are 
also welcome to join the May 17 field trip; however, they must provide 
their own transportation.
    The Provincial Advisory Committee provides advice regarding 
ecosystem management for federal lands within the Western Washington 
Cascades Province, as well as advice and recommendations to promote 
better integration of forest management activities among federal and 
non-federal entities. The Advisory Committee is a key element of 
implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Penny Sundblad, Province Liaison, USDA Forest Service, Mt. 
Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, Mt. Baker Ranger District, 2105 State 
Route 20, Sedro-Woolley, Washington 98284 (360-856-5700, Extension 
321).

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. appendix.

    Dated: April 20, 2000.
Ronald R. DeHart,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 00-10428 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Aksys, Ltd.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
18073) on Form S-8 of Aksys, Ltd. of our report dated January 21, 1998, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Aksys, Ltd. as of December 31, 1997, and
1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1997, and for the period from January 18, 1991 (inception) through
December 31, 1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997, annual report
on Form 10-K of Aksys, Ltd.


                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 1998
# Official Journal L 190/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.190.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 190 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5222 July 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.190.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 190

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5222 July 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS ADOPTED JOINTLY BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL |
| | * | Decision No 633/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

DECISIONS ADOPTED JOINTLY BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

*

Decision No 633/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community

1

| | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | European Central Bank |
| | | 2009/555/EC |
| | * | Decision of the European Central Bank of 19 June 2009 amending Decision ECB/2003/14 concerning the administration of the borrowing-and-lending operations concluded by the European Community under the medium-term financial assistance facility (ECB/2009/17) | 11 |

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

DECISIONS

European Central Bank

2009/555/EC

*

Decision of the European Central Bank of 19 June 2009 amending Decision ECB/2003/14 concerning the administration of the borrowing-and-lending operations concluded by the European Community under the medium-term financial assistance facility (ECB/2009/17)

(ECB/2009/17)

11

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
|    1) | 3 SETS OF SHAFTS/ MONTH FOR 12 MONTHS (Maximum 8 shafts per set) |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | $2,000/ MONTH PAID IN COMMON SHARES OF AREM BASED ON THE AVERAGE CLOSING PRICE OF THE LAST FIVE DAYS OF EACH MONTH |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3)   | PAY EXPENSES ON TRIP AND TOUR RELATED (Subject to all expenses pre-approved in writing) |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4)   | MAINTAIN AT LEAST 100 SHAFT INVENTORY AT JEFF'S FACILITY (7550 STERNS RD, OTTAWA LAKE, MI 49267) (TO BE INVOICED BY AREM TO JEFF) WITH THE STARTING INVENTORY OF 448 SHAFTS |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|    5) | INCENTIVE PROGRAM TO BE DEVELOPED AS THE PRODUCT IS LAUNCHED |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

|    1) | FITTING OF PGA AND LPGA TOUR PLAYERS |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------|

| 2)   | CREATION OF FITTING SCHEDULES AND CHARTS FOR OEMS, TOUR TRAILERS, CLUB MAKERS AND INDIVIDUAL SALES |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3)   | MANUFACTURING OF SHAFT SETS (IRONS, HYBRIDS, WEDGES AND PUTTERS) |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

|    4) | COORDINATING AND RUNNING SEMINARS FOR CLUB MAKERS |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------|

|    5) | R&D FOR SCANDIUM AND COMPOSITE SHAFTS |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------|

| 6)   | SHAFTS RETAINED/ BOUGHT BY JEFF WILL BE CHARGED AT $24/SHAFT EXCEPT FOR THE 3 SETS PER MONTH FOR THE 12 MONTH PERIOD |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|    1) | COMMENCING OCTOBER 20,2010 AND ENDING ON OCTOBER 19,2011 |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------|

|    2) | RENEWABLE UPON MUTUAL AGREEMENT |
|-----------------|---------------------------------|

|    3) | 3 MONTHS TERMINATION BY EITHER PARTY |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------|

|                                                      |                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| JEFF MANOREPRO-GOLF TEACHING ACADEMY LLC   | NATALIYA HEARNELEMENT 21 GOLF COMPANY(AREM) |
§ 1253.420 Access to schools operated by LEAs. A recipient that is a local educational agency shall not, on the basis of sex, exclude any person from admission to: ( a ) Any institution of vocational education operated by such recipient; or
( b ) Any other school or educational unit operated by such recipient, unless such recipient otherwise makes available to such person, pursuant to the same policies and criteria of admission, courses, services, and facilities comparable to each course, service, and facility offered in or through such schools.
§ 121.493 Flight time limitations: Flight engineers and flight navigators. ( a ) In any operation in which one flight engineer or flight navigator is required, the flight time limitations in § 121.483 apply to that flight engineer or flight navigator.
( b ) In any operation in which more than one flight engineer or flight navigator is required, the flight time limitations in § 121.485 apply to those flight engineers or flight navigators.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21433-21434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10078]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, April 26, 2000.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

[[Page 21434]]


Matters to be Considered:   
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: April 19, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-10078 Filed 4-19-00; 10:32 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# L_2009041EN.01S00301.xml

| 12.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 41/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 41/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
§ 111.200 Applicability. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 86 FR 31067 , June 10, 2021.
( a ) This subpart prescribes the requirements for reporting records to the PRD about individuals employed as pilots and applies to the following reporting entities: ( 1 ) Each operator that holds an air carrier or operating certificate issued in accordance with part 119 of this chapter and is authorized to conduct operations under part 121, 125, or 135 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Each operator that holds management specifications to operate in accordance with subpart K of part 91 of this chapter.
( 3 ) Each operator that holds a letter of authorization to conduct air tour operations in accordance with § 91.147 of this chapter.
( 4 ) Each operator described in § 111.1(b)(4).
( 5 ) Each entity that conducts public aircraft operations as described in § 111.1(b)(5).
( 6 ) The trustee in bankruptcy of any operator described in this section.
( b ) Compliance is required for this subpart as follows: ( 1 ) Compliance with this subpart is required within 30 days of the reporting entity commencing aircraft operations.
( 2 ) Specific compliance dates for records described in § 111.205(b)(2) are set forth in § 111.255.
[86 FR 31060, June 10, 2021, as amended at 86 FR 31067, June 10, 2021]
<PAGE>   1

                                 Exhibit 10.2

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                             Contact: Steve McClellan
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         1-888-279-4542

              PERKINS FAMILY RESTAURANTS RECEIVES OFFER FROM TRC
                           TO MERGE AND GO PRIVATE

MEMPHIS, TN, August 4, 1997 --- Perkins Family Restaurants, L.P., announced
today that it received a proposal from The Restaurant Company (TRC) to acquire
through a merger all of the approximately 52 percent of the outstanding units of
limited partnership now owned by public investors for $13 per unit in cash.

The Restaurant Company owns Perkins Management Company, the general partner of
Perkins Family Restaurants, and also owns the remaining 48 percent of the
outstanding units of limited partnership interest. The proposed transaction is
subject to receipt of an opinion from an investment banking firm that the
transaction is fair from a financial point of view, the affirmative vote of a
majority of the units held by public unitholders casting votes and the obtaining
of adequate financing.

Perkins Family Restaurants, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership whose units are
traded on the New York Stock Exchange, currently owns and operates 134 Perkins
Family Restaurants and franchises an additional 332 restaurants in 32 states and
Canada Additional information on the company is available on the Worldwide Web
at http://www.perkinsrestaurants.com.



                                    # # #
# Official Journal C 318/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.318.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 318 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5520 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.318.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 318

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5520 October 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2012/C 318/01 | Opinion No 6/2012 (pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 287(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules for the participation and dissemination in ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’ | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2012/C 318/01

Opinion No 6/2012 (pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 287(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules for the participation and dissemination in ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’

(pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 287(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 1264.136 Initial decision. ( a ) The presiding officer shall issue an initial decision based solely on the record, which shall contain findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the amount of any penalties and assessments imposed.
( b ) The findings of fact shall include a finding on each of the following issues: ( 1 ) Whether the claims or statements identified in the complaint, or any portions thereof, violate § 1264.102;
( 2 ) If the person is liable for penalties or assessments, the appropriate amount of any such penalties or assessments considering any mitigating or aggravating factors found in the case, such as those described in § 1264.130.
( c ) The presiding officer shall promptly serve the initial decision on all parties within 90 days after the time for submission of post-hearing briefs and reply briefs (if permitted) has expired or upon notification that the record is now closed. The presiding officer shall at the same time serve all parties with a statement describing the right of any defendant determined to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment to file a motion for reconsideration with the presiding officer or a notice of appeal with the authority head. If the presiding officer fails to meet the deadline contained in this paragraph, he or she shall notify the parties of the reason for the delay and shall set a new deadline.
( d ) Unless the initial decision of the presiding officer is timely appealed to the authority head, or a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision is timely filed, the initial decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after it is issued by the presiding officer.
[52 FR 39498, Oct. 22, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 600, Jan. 9, 1989]
#### PRUETT v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 17, 1915.)

Appeal from Barbour Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. M. Sollie.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and W. H. Mitci-iell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Brown, J.

Appeal dismissed on motion of Attorney General on the authority of *Cameron v. State, infra,*69 South. 400.