alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3678 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3678

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the work 
     opportunity tax credit to include trade adjustment assistance 
                    recipients as a targeted group.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2003

 Mr. Houghton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the work 
     opportunity tax credit to include trade adjustment assistance 
                    recipients as a targeted group.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT TO COVER TRADE 
              ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE RECIPIENTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (related to members of targeted groups) is amended 
by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (G), by striking the 
period at the end of subparagraph (H) and inserting ``, or'', and by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(I) a qualified TAA recipient.''.
    (b) Qualified TAA Recipient.--
            (1) In general.--Subsection (d) of section 51 of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating 
        paragraphs (10), (11), and (12) as paragraphs (11), (12), and 
        (13), respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (9) the 
        following new paragraph:
            ``(10) Qualified taa recipient.--The term `qualified TAA 
        recipient' means any individual who is certified by the 
        designated local agency as receiving trade adjustment 
        assistance benefits under chapter 2 of title II of the Trade 
        Act of 1974 for any month ending within the 60-day period 
        ending on the hiring date.''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 51A(c)(1) of such Code 
        is amended by striking ``section 51(d)(11)'' and inserting 
        ``section 51(d)(12)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to individuals who begin work for the employer after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 141.38 Airports. ( a ) An applicant for a pilot school certificate or a provisional pilot school certificate must show that he or she has continuous use of each airport at which training flights originate.
( b ) Each airport used for airplanes and gliders must have at least one runway or takeoff area that allows training aircraft to make a normal takeoff or landing under the following conditions at the aircraft's maximum certificated takeoff gross weight: ( 1 ) Under wind conditions of not more than 5 miles per hour;
( 2 ) At temperatures in the operating area equal to the mean high temperature for the hottest month of the year;
( 3 ) If applicable, with the powerplant operation, and landing gear and flap operation recommended by the manufacturer; and
( 4 ) In the case of a takeoff— ( i ) With smooth transition from liftoff to the best rate of climb speed without exceptional piloting skills or techniques; and
( ii ) Clearing all obstacles in the takeoff flight path by at least 50 feet.
( c ) Each airport must have a wind direction indicator that is visible from the end of each runway at ground level;
( d ) Each airport must have a traffic direction indicator when: ( 1 ) The airport does not have an operating control tower; and
( 2 ) UNICOM advisories are not available.
( e ) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, each airport used for night training flights must have permanent runway lights;
( f ) An airport or seaplane base used for night training flights in seaplanes is permitted to use adequate nonpermanent lighting or shoreline lighting, if approved by the Administrator.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16347, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 141-9, 62 FR 40907, July 30, 1997]
Exhibit 31(b)

CERTIFICATION

I, James A. Parke, certify that: 

**
1. 
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of      General Electric Capital Services, Inc.;
 
2.  
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under      which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period      covered by this report; 
 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other      financial information included in this report, fairly present in all      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this      report; 
 
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for      the registrant and have: 
  
a)  
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or      caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our      supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the      registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us      by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which      this report is being prepared; 
  
b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
  
c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the      registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or      is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal      control over financial reporting; and 
 
5. 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over      financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee      of the registrant's board of directors: 
  
a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in      the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which      are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to      record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
  
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves      management or other employees who have a significant role in the      registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
 

Date:     May 4, 2004

/s/ James A. Parke
James A. Parke
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
 

 

**
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on form 10-Q for the period ended September 25, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
I. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

       (1). The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

       (2). The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: October 12, 2004                        By: /s/Douglas I. Payne
                                                  -------------------
                                                    Douglas I. Payne
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1
 Data and Consulting Services
Division of Schlumberger Technology CorporationTwo Robinson Plaza, Suite 200
6600 Steubenville Pike
Pittsburgh, PA 15205-1017
Tel: 412-787-5403

Fax: 412-787-2906
    
    (SCHLUMBERGER LOGO)
  
   Table 1
 Table 1
 Estimated Net Reserves And Future Net Revenue
Certain Proved Oil And Gas Interests
Quicksilver Resources, Inc.
United States Producing Properties
As Of 31 December 2009
 Proved
    
    
    Proved
    
    
    Proved
    
    
    TotalProducing
    
    
    Nonproducing
    
    
    Undeveloped
    
    
    ProvedReserves
    
    
    Reserves
    
    
    Reserves
    
    
    ReservesRemaining Net ReservesOil, MBbls
    
    
    1,863.3
    
    
    
    603.4
    
    
    
    391.4
    
    
    
    2,858.0Gas, MMscf
    
    
    636,332.4
    
    
    
    407,807.2
    
    
    
    511,894.3
    
    
    
    1,556,034.0NGL, MBbls
    
    
    50,150.3
    
    
    
    10,846.2
    
    
    
    37,264.9
    
    
    
    98,261.4Income Data (M$)Future Net Revenue
    
    
    3,474,639.8
    
    
    
    1,644,471.0
    
    
    
    2,668,310.5
    
    
    
    7,787,422.0Future Net Cashflow
    
    
    1,493,605.4
    
    
    
    610,957.2
    
    
    
    574,400.9
    
    
    
    2,678,963.8Discounted PV @ 10% (M$)
    
    
    765,019.1
    
    
    
    235,575.0
    
    
    
    2,933.9
    
    
    
    1,003,528.1




---



##### 



Data & Consulting Services
Division of Schlumberger Technology Corporation
    
    (SCHLUMBERGER LOGO)
 
     TM




---



##### 



Data & Consulting Services
Division of Schlumberger Technology Corporation
    
    (SCHLUMBERGER LOGO)




---



##### 



Data & Consulting Services
Division of Schlumberger Technology Corporation
    
    (SCHLUMBERGER LOGO)
 
     /s/ Denise L. Delozier

Denise L. Delozier
    
    
    
    /s/ Charles M. Boyer

Charles M. Boyer II, PG, CPGSenior Engineer
    
    
    
    Scientific AdvisorUnconventional Reservoirs/s/ Walter K. Sawyer

Walter K. Sawyer, PE
    
    
    
    /s/ Jeron R. Williamson

Jeron R. WilliamsonPrincipal Consultant
    
    
    
    Senior Engineer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ANTHONY L. TILLMAN a/k/a 

NAZIR EL,

Defendant BelowAppellant,

v.

US BANK NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff BelowAppellee.

§

§ No. 250, 2018

§

§

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. N17L-07-057

§

§

§

Submitted: June 18, 2018

 Decided: July 25, 2018

Corrected: August 10, 2018

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; SEITZ and TRAYNOR, Justices.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the rule to show cause, the appellant’s response, 

and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, Anthony L. Tillman, filed this appeal from an 

order of the Superior Court, docketed April 25, 2018, denying his motion to 

set aside a Sheriff’s sale because the motion had no factual or legal basis. 

(2) Along with his notice of appeal, Tillman also filed an “Affidavit 

of Financial Statement,” apparently seeking to proceed in forma pauperis

(IFP). The Senior Court Clerk wrote to Tillman on May 9, 2018 and directed 
2

him to file a motion to proceed IFP in compliance with Supreme Court Rule

20(h) or else pay the filing fee by May 24, 2018. Tillman did not file his 

motion or pay the filing fee as instructed in the Clerk’s letter. Accordingly, 

on May 29, 2018, the Clerk issued a notice to Tillman to show cause why his 

appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute.

(3) Tillman filed a response to the notice to show cause on June 18, 

2018. While it is not entirely clear, Tillman appears to contend that the 

Court’s official IFP form only applies to corporations and that the Court 

cannot legally compel him to file the required form or inquire into his financial 

status.

(4) We reject Tillman’s argument. Permission to proceed as a 

pauper without prepayment of the filing in a civil matter is a matter of 

privilege, not a right.1 Neither Rule 20, Official Form Q nor 10 Del. C. ch. 88 

bars an indigent person access to courts in Delaware or otherwise violates any 

person’s constitutional rights.

2

 We find no merit to Tillman’s argument that 

it is illegal for the Court to inquire into his financial status in order to 

determine his ability to pay a fee.

 

1

See Walls v. Phelps, 2014 WL 279472, *2 (Del. Jan. 23, 2014) (citing Abdul-Akbar v. 

McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307, 314 (3d Cir. 2001)).

2

Id.
3

(5) Under the circumstances, we dismiss this appeal for Tillman’s 

failure to prosecute it diligently by refusing to comply with the Court’s May 

9, 2018 directive to file an IFP motion in compliance with the Court’s rules

or else pay the filing fee. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4060                     900
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                          4100                    4100
<OTHER-SE>                                      (8160)                  (5000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3160                     900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3160)                   (900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3160)                   (900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3160)                   (900)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)                  (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)                  (0.00)
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2167

JANICE ROBINSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Raymond Mabus, Secretary,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Wilmington. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00004-H)

Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 26, 2017

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.*

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janice Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Roberto Francisco Ramirez, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

 * The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) 

(2012).
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Janice Robinson appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment 

discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Dep’t of 

the Navy, No. 7:15-cv-00004-H (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 31, 2016 & entered Sept. 1, 2016). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
180214 MITSUBISHI MOTOR SALES OF CARIBBEAN, INC. LIFT STAY SCH VERSION FEBRUARY 14, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF MOTION REQUESTING RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY

The Court has received and reviewed the Motion Requesting Relief from 

Automatic Stay (the “Motion”) filed by Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Caribbean, Inc. (the 

“Movant”). (Docket Entry No. 2488.) Opposition papers to the Motion must be filed by

February 27, 2018. Movant’s reply papers must be filed by March 6, 2018 (the “Reply 

Deadline”). In compliance with Rule 5(g) of the Local Rules for the United States District Court

for the District of Puerto Rico, and absent a stipulation by the parties consenting to the relief 

sought in the Motion or withdrawal of the Motion, the Movant must file translations of any 

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last 

four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2502 Filed:02/14/18 Entered:02/14/18 11:18:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
180214 MITSUBISHI MOTOR SALES OF CARIBBEAN, INC. LIFT STAY SCH VERSION FEBRUARY 14, 2018 2

documents originally filed in Spanish with this Court by the Reply Deadline. Failure to comply 

with Local Rule 5(g) may result in the denial of the Motion without prejudice. 

The Court will take the Motion on submission, unless a party thereto requests a 

hearing.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 14, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2502 Filed:02/14/18 Entered:02/14/18 11:18:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 9, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-51286

Summary Calendar

 

PRINCE S. J. WEBBER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CV-428-PRM 

--------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Prince S. J. Webber, federal prisoner # 04349-000,

(“Webber”) appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Webber’s petition

sought relief from a decision of the United States Parole

Commission rescinding a presumptive parole date of September 13,

2003, and continuing his incarceration to a presumptive parole

date of September 13, 2005, on the basis of new and significant

adverse information. The district court denied Webber’s motion

to appeal in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and certified that the appeal
No. 03-51286

-2-

was not taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and FED.

R. APP. P. 24(a). Webber has filed a motion for leave to appeal

IFP, thereby challenging the district court’s certification. See

Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Webber also

has filed a motion for appointment of appellate counsel. The

counsel motion is DENIED.

Webber’s appellate issues do not involve legal points that

are arguable on their merits. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215,

220 (5th Cir. 1983). Contrary to his assertions, the record

reflects that the Commission’s decision was based on new and

significant adverse information because Webber had failed to

comply with a condition to the 2003 presumptive parole date. The

Commission complied with the parole statutes in summarizing a

psychological report at the hearing and withholding from Webber a

copy of the full report. Webber has made no cogent argument that

he was prejudiced by the Commission’s alleged failure to comply

with statutory deadlines. Webber’s other arguments are

incomprehensible and therefore any other issues are deemed

abandoned. See United States v. Cothran, 302 F.3d 279, 286 n.7

(5th Cir. 2002). 

Webber’s IFP motion is DENIED and this appeal is DISMISSED

as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202

& n.24. 

MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of General Metals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Parent, the President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 5, 2007.

 

/s/ Stephen Parent                                                          

Stephen Parent

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

CW1229878.1