alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1240.106 Review and evaluation of contribution. ( a ) A contribution will be initially reviewed by the Board on the basis of the material submitted by the applicant under § 1240.104(b).
( b ) If it is determined that the contribution has been used in a NASA program, or adopted or sponsored or supported by NASA, the contribution will be evaluated for its significant value in the conduct of aeronautical or space activity.
( c ) The Board will recommend an award for such contribution when, upon evaluation of its scientific and technical merits, it is determined to warrant an award of at least $500.
#### § 152.425 Effect of subpart.

Nothing contained in this subpart diminishes or supersedes the obligations imposed by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d), Executive Order 11246 (42 U.S.C. 2000e (note)), or any other Federal law or Executive Order relating to civil rights.
§ 156.4 Airport and project eligibility. ( a ) A participating State shall use monies distributed pursuant to a State block grant agreement for airport development and airport planning, for airport noise compatibility planning, or to carry out airport noise compatibility programs, in accordance with the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, as amended.
( b ) A participating State shall administer the airport development and airport planning projects for airports within the State.
( c ) A participating State shall not use any monies distributed pursuant to a State block grant agreement for integrated airport system planning, projects related to any primary airport, or any airports— ( 1 ) Outside the State's boundaries; or
( 2 ) Inside the State's boundaries that are not included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems.
<PAGE>



                                                               EXHIBIT 15



                       Independent Auditors' Review Report
                       -----------------------------------

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The Centris Group, Inc.:

We have reviewed the condensed  consolidated balance sheet of The Centris Group,
Inc. (formerly US Facilities  Corporation) and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997,
and the related  condensed  consolidated  income statements for the quarters and
six-month  periods  ended June 30,  1997 and 1996,  and  condensed  consolidated
statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 1997 and 1996.
These condensed  consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants.  A review  of  interim  financial
information consists principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with  generally  accepted  auditing  standards,  the  objective  of which is the
expression of an opinion  regarding the financial  statements  taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for
them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in accordance  with generally  accepted  auditing
standards,  the consolidated  balance sheet of The Centris Group, Inc. (formerly
US Facilities  Corporation)  and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1996, and the
related  consolidated income statement,  statements of stockholders'  equity and
cash  flows for the year then ended (not  presented  herein);  and in our report
dated  February  4,  1997,  we  expressed  an   unqualified   opinion  on  those
consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying  condensed  consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1996,
is fairly  stated,  in all material  respects,  in relation to the  consolidated
balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/S/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Los Angeles, California
July 28, 1997


<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In Re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al,

Debtors

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered) 

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17-BK 4780-LTS

This motion relates to PREPA 

and shall be filed in Lead Case 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS and case

No. 17 BK 4780-LTS 

In Re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as representative of 

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER 

AUTHORITY,

Debtor

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR SERVICE OF

NOTICES, ORDERS, PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS

NOW COMES the law firm of Law Offices of Herrero III & Associates, P.S.C., by 

the undersigned attorney and hereby enters its appearance in this case on behalf of the 

PUERTO RICO MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (hereinafter PRMA), and 

requests that all pleadings, orders, notices and other documents filed and entered in 

this case, or any related proceedings be served on undersigned attorneys.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24491 Filed:06/12/23 Entered:06/12/23 13:57:37 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
SERVED I hereby certify that on this same date I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notification of 

such filing to all participants and Standard Parties.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 12th day of June 2023.

/s/ ISMAEL H. HERRERO III

LAW OFFICES OF HERRERO III

& ASSOCIATES, P.S.C.

USDCPR #203002

P.O. BOX 362159

San Juan, P.R. 00936-2159

Tel. (787) 754-5000/(787) 509-3666

Email: herreroiLLL@herrerolaw.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24491 Filed:06/12/23 Entered:06/12/23 13:57:37 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3972 

To provide that the unused balance of a dependent care flexible spending 

arrangement at the end of plan year 2020 may be rolled over to the 

following plan year. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2020 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mrs. CAPITO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide that the unused balance of a dependent care 

flexible spending arrangement at the end of plan year 

2020 may be rolled over to the following plan year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Dependent 

5 Care Flexible Spending Arrangement Rollover Act of 

6 2020’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3972 IS

1 SEC. 2. ROLLOVER OF UNUSED BALANCE OF DEPENDENT 

2 CARE FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS 

3 TO PLAN YEAR 2021. 

4 As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment 

5 of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury (or the Sec6 retary’s delegate) shall issue regulations or other guidance 

7 that permit the unused balance (determined as of the end 

8 of plan year 2020) of any dependent care flexible spending 

9 arrangement to be rolled over to plan year 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM XOX
CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000798122
<NAME> XOX CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                1,024,474
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           240,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1,526,112
<PP&E>                                                  549,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                          393,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        1,829,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   177,858
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 73,823
<OTHER-SE>                                           12,289,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          1,829,326
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        674,531
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         2,096,717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       35,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,349,408)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
</LEGEND>

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                           2,284,000
<SECURITIES>                     9,310,000
<RECEIVABLES>                    8,546,000
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                20,140,000
<PP&E>                           1,784,000
<DEPRECIATION>                     661,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  47,579,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            7,872,000
<BONDS>                          2,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                           515,000
<OTHER-SE>                      36,749,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    47,579,000
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                45,908,000
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   42,553,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 788,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  3,355,000
<INCOME-TAX>                    (1,310,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              4,633,000
<DISCONTINUED>                    (914,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                     3,719,000
<EPS-BASIC>                           0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.59






</TABLE>
#### NANCY LEFEVRE’S LESSEE *v.*MURDOCK.

Deed of a married woman — void—divorce from bed and board — use of lot for alimonj- — right * of entry — ejectment.

The deed of a married woman is void at common law, though such deed may be good if made under a statute.

A decree of divorce from bed and board, allowing the wife the use of a city lot for alimony, vests her with a legal right to enter and use, on which she can maintain ejectment.

Ejectment for lot 35 in Cincinnati. The plaintiff made title under a decree of the Supreme Court in Hamilton county, divorcing Nancy Lefevre and her husband from *bed and board,*and allowing her the use of the lot 35 for her alimony. .

The defendant offered to read in evidence a deed from Nancy Lefevre, bearing date after her marriage and before her divorce from Lefevre.

*Starr,*for the plaintiff,

contended that the deed of Mrs. Lefevre made during coverture, was void, and insisted that the decree of divorce vested in her the right to the possession of the lot.

*Storer,*contra,

contended that the decree of the court did not operate upon the land, so as to vest Mrs. Lefevre with a right of *206entry; but if it did, it would be inoperative against her own deed of. conveyance.

Lane, J.

The deed of a femme covert, unless made in pursuance of some statute, is void and of no avail. The decree allowing Mrs. Lefevre *the use*of the lot in dispute, is either entirely nugatory, or its effect is to secure her the possession of the lot that she may use it. We think the latter its ostensible and legitimate effect.

Verdict for the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was made, argued and overruled. Judgment on the verdict.
§ 1216.305 Actions normally requiring an environmental assessment (EA). ( a ) NASA shall prepare an EA, which complies with 40 CFR 1501.5, when a proposed action is not categorically excluded and is not likely to have significant effects or when the significance of the effects is unknown. NASA shall consider the potentially affected environment and degree of the effects of the action when determining whether to prepare an EA.
( b ) NASA actions normally requiring an EA include: ( 1 ) Altering the ongoing operations at a NASA Center where the significance of the environmental effect(s) is unknown.
( 2 ) Construction or modifications of facilities that represent a major change to an existing master plan and could result in a change in the environmental effect(s).
( 3 ) Actions that are expected to result in major changes to established land use.
( 4 ) Launching a spacecraft containing a space nuclear system. Space nuclear systems include radioisotope power systems, such as radioisotope thermoelectric generators and radioisotope heater units, and fission systems used for surface power and spacecraft propulsion.
[89 FR 25502, Apr. 11, 2024]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 337 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                   Union Calendar No. 2
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 337

                           [Report No. 108-4]

   To extend certain hydro-electric licenses in the State of Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2003

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

                            February 4, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend certain hydro-electric licenses in the State of Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAY AND REINSTATEMENT OF FERC LICENSE NO. 11393.

    (a) Upon the request of the licensee for FERC Project No. 11393, 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall issue an order staying 
the license.
    (b) Upon the request of the licensee for FERC Project No. 11393, 
but not later than 6 years after the date that the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission receives written notice that construction of the 
Swan-Tyee transmission line is completed, the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission shall issue an order lifting the stay and make the effective 
date of the license the date on which the stay is lifted.
    (c) Upon request of the licensee for FERC Project No. 11393 and 
notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act for the commencement of construction, the Commission shall, 
after reasonable notice and in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section, extend the 
time period during which licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for not more than one 2-year time period.

                                                   Union Calendar No. 2

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 337

                           [Report No. 108-4]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To extend certain hydro-electric licenses in the State of Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 4, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
. . . . . 

%..:r.* 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF T’EXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable %* E, Elliott, P.&. ) 

judge w atlol1.h .thtl offWe. Xt is obtiouo that 

the l~~irlatur. cti.lgwdLy p1m.A th o l p~lntiry, 

p a wor inthe dietriat ju4 x&her aa th w in the so * 

ml~o lo a aourt. oro t Lik 4 wlw EM p o wotx o dlo R o ntfnus the sarrloer or t&a auditin- was *issly pIme 

with auah jud@ rsthni t&m wiul t&e oourt. The 

ofrloe of mudltar has tba moot Irrtlsmto rdatlm 

to tbe aotiona of the .odsslonero~ oorirt and th. 

oomalrolworo 8homoolveo. It lo of Oh* highoat 

pall. OOaQm timt 4u4h en 02210.r bo left .atlr.- 

ty in4 tram the eontraL of then oSSlO.ra, mm 

tc the eotont of a poeoiblc rwov%l by th. Aloeontlnuanao of the Authr or his ftmu. h l cilithn 

it Is of gmrt ;&tlio ieportenoe tE6t e l kUleu d 

experl~n.eQ arfioer af thlo klad, 8lred7 halkr 

dth the finsno~al .onution8 of t&o oouat7 as& it. 

Euolnooo, rhoold not be #bJaet*a to t&o podblo 

reoultr of raoh biennial .lootlon, tt IO our 07i.n. 

loa that WEen the .owi.oriau4ro' oouro owe tRk.0 

aotlos whleh 10.6. to tho rypolntmmt of an aoditor 

GOT a 04uat7, owh 00 10 retems to ia Artlab 

1646, 8UOh OOwty, a@ for 80 th0 0#100 IO OQ~O~H&OA, 

we th6 rppolntaont of Ott *.&&.ntthw..i10 owowned btmmee uwtLy like ooantieo AeaQpatrteA 

in Artf.1. 1665; subjest to tho porrsr of the Ai* 

tr io s judge l l~no to ~lowntinuo i&o aorrio*o Qz 

euoh wAltor in the wuin.r . . pr0vid.U in Artfel. 

1646.” 

In do* of th. fo ofa& 

T 

it lo bho opialoa oi 

thle 4epRraunt that tho 41otr et judeo ~Qmo ho tb #ow4r 

Do Alooontlauo the sonioeo OX owk auditor In the mnn1op as 

provi.doA ia trtlolo Iti& Tesnb~~e bnstatod Gtvil -?ktateot 

Tmaoting th%t the Soreuol4q SULLY awworo Jour in- 

&.r7, we are 

Yvu?. YeFy tstl1y
Exhibit
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**§
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
      Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
      the period ending October 31, 2007(the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Ryan, Chief
      Executive Officer, President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)                 The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)                 The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








December
                6, 2007
            /s/Christopher
                J. RyanChristopher
                J. RyanChief
                Executive Officer, President,Secretary
                and General Counsel







28
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

January 9, 2003

Robert M. Pickus
[ADDRESS]

Re:  Employment Agreement dated April 17, 2000 between Robert M. Pickus and
     Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc., Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts
     Holdings, L.P. and Trump Atlantic City Associates (collectively "Trump")
     (the "Agreement")

Dear Mr. Pickus:

This letter will confirm that the Agreement is hereby amended as set forth
below:

1.   the Expiration Date is extended to December 31, 2006;

2.   paragraph 2 is amended to reflect the annual base salary of $400,000; and

3.   paragraph 3 is amended to state that commencing January 1, 2004 the annual
     salary shall be increased at a rate not less than 5% per annum.

Except to the extent modified herein, you and Trump hereby ratify the Agreement
and agree that all other terms, conditions and obligations contained therein
remain in full force and effect as stated in the Agreement.

                                           Very truly yours,

                                                /s/ Mark A. Brown
                                           ------------------------------
                                                    MARK A. BROWN
                                               Chief Operating Officer

Agreed and Consented to:

  /s/ Robert M. Pickus
--------------------------
      Robert M. Pickus

1/13/03
Date