alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 622.52 Purpose and scope. The rules and procedures specified in this subpart and in subpart A are applicable to proceedings by the FCA to assess and collect civil money penalties: ( a ) For violations of the terms of a final cease and desist order issued under section 5.25 or 5.26 of the Act;
( b ) For violations of any provision of the Act or any regulation issued under the Act; or
( c ) For violations of the National Flood Insurance Reform Act (Reform Act) as set forth in 42 U.S.C. 4012a(f) or any regulation issued under the Reform Act.
[51 FR 21139, June 11, 1986, as amended at 70 FR 12584, Mar. 15, 2005]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.47

       Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement

         This Amendment No. 1 (this "Amendment"), dated as of September 1, 2003
amends that certain First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of
January 7, 2002 (the "Agreement") by and between William E. McGlashan, Jr.
("Executive") and Critical Path, Inc. (the "Company"). All capitalized terms
used herein and not defined shall have the meanings assigned to them in the
Agreement.

                                    RECITALS

     1.  Executive desires to voluntarily reduce his base salary to $300,000 per
         annum.

     2.  The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
         have determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to
         accept Executive's voluntary salary reduction and to amend the
         Agreement to reflect the terms of such reduction as stated herein.

         NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agrees as follows:

1.       Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to provide that
Executive's base salary shall henceforth be $300,000 per annum.

2.       Such salary reduction shall be effective until such time as (i) the
Company is EBITDA profitable or (ii) has secured additional working capital
funding proceeds of at least $15,000,000 through an asset sale, an equity-based
financing (including convertible debt), or a combination thereof. Upon the
occurrence of any such event, Executive's base salary shall revert to the amount
in effect immediately prior to this reduction ($405,000).

3.       Notwithstanding anything set forth to the contrary in the Change of
Control Severance Agreement dated as of May 29, 2003 between the Company and
Executive, it is understood and agreed that the Executive's annual base salary
referred to in Section 4(a)(1) of such agreement shall be deemed to be $405,000
for purposes of such Section.

4.       This Amendment and the Agreement constitute the entire understanding
between the parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein. Except
as modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this
Amendment as of the Effective Date.

                                            CRITICAL PATH, INC.

 /s/ William E. McGlashan, Jr.               /s/ Michael J. Zukerman
------------------------------------        -----------------------------------
William E. McGlashan, Jr.                   Name: Michael Zukerman
                                            Title: SVP
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          2,352
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    16,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               38,403
<PP&E>                                          4,329
<DEPRECIATION>                                    363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 42,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,001
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      121,242
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   42,731
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9,194
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,670)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 18,864
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    9,194
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0



</TABLE>
APPEALS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

January Term, 1898.]

(Mamin, Eighth Circuit; Wilson, Second Circuit, and Parker, Sixth Circuit, JJ. sitting in Hamilton County Circuit Court.)

#### Browne, Assignee, v. Wallace, Assignee, et al.

t. Order of Court of Insolvency Confirming Sale, without Adjudication as to Priorities, not Appealable.

An order of a court of insolvency, confirming a sale by a trustee, without adjudication as to priorities, merely finding proceedings to be regular and in accordance with the order for sale, is not a final order and appeal will not lie.

2. Recital in Entry that Notice of Appeal was Given by a Trustee is Insufficient, where it does not Appear that Notice was in Writing,

The recital in the journal entry of the court of insolvency that notice of appeal was given by a trustee who wished to appeal in his trust capacity, and, therefore, is not obliged to give bond, is not a compliance with sec. 6408, Rev. Stat., requiring that notice of appeal must be given m writing, inasmuch as it does not appear affirmatively that the notice referred to was in writing.

5. Recital that Oral Notice was Given not a Compliance with Statute.

In this case another personal entry contained the recital that an oral notice of appeal was given: *Held,*That this, on its face was not a compliance with the statute.

*765*Follett &*Kelley, and *F. W. Browne,*for plaintiff in error.

*Witty & Wald,*contra.

Parker, J.

1. An order confirming a sale, where there is no adjudication as to priorities, but merely a finding that the proceedings for the .sale were regular and in accordance with the order for sale, is not a final order, and an appeal from it will not lie.

2. The recital in the journal entry of the court of insolvency that notice of appeal was given by a trustee who wished to appeal in his trust capacity and therefore is not obliged to give bond, is not a compliance with sec. 6408, Rev. Stat., requiring that notice of appeal must be given in writing, inasmuch as it does not appear affirmatively that the notice referred to in the journal entry was in writing. In this holding the court

follows the decision in Willis, Admr., v. Willis, 10 Circ. Dec., 000, a case from Washington C. H., decided by the circuit court for the second circuit and affirmed in the Supreme Court without report, 57 O. S., 668, where the question presented here was the only question made.

3. In the case at bar, another journal entry contained the recital that an oral notice of appeal was given. The court hold that this, on its face, was not a compliance with the statute.

Both judgments of common pleas in dismissing appeals from the court of insolvency, affirmed.
#### § 615.5215 Distribution of earnings.

The boards of directors of System institutions may not reduce the permanent capital of the institution through the payment of patronage refunds or dividends, or the retirement of stock or allocated equities except retirements pursuant to §§ 615.5280 and 615.5290 if, after or due to the action, the permanent capital of the institution would fail to meet the minimum permanent capital adequacy standard established under § 615.5205 for that period. This limitation shall not apply to the payment of noncash patronage refunds by any institution exempt from Federal income tax if the entire refund paid qualifies as permanent capital at the issuing institution. Any System institution subject to Federal income tax may pay patronage refunds partially in cash if the cash portion of the refund is the minimum amount required to qualify the refund as a deductible patronage distribution for Federal income tax purposes and the remaining portion of the refund paid qualifies as permanent capital.

[53 FR 39247, Oct. 6, 1988, as amended at 53 FR 40046, Oct. 13, 1988]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3948 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3948

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on 
 Native Children Act to extend the deadline for a report by the Alyce 
Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALYCE SPOTTED BEAR AND WALTER SOBOLEFF COMMISSION ON NATIVE 
              CHILDREN REPORT.

    Section 3(f) of the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff 
Commission on Native Children Act (Public Law 114-244; 130 Stat. 987) 
is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``3 
years'' and inserting ``5 years''.

            Passed the Senate December 20, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3948

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on 
 Native Children Act to extend the deadline for a report by the Alyce 
Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-23 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Exhibit 21 to Complaint Dkt 1-21 Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-23 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Exhibit 21 to Complaint Dkt 1-21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Intergold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Grant Atkins, as President/Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer/Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: July 8, 2003                     /s/ GRANT ATKINS
                                       ______________________
                                           Grant Atkins
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer



Date: July 8, 2003                     /s/ GRANT ATKINS
                                       ______________________
                                           Grant Atkins
                                           Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-71421-00,333-107289-00 and 333-139879-00) of Knight Capital Group, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2007, relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

New York, New York 

February 28, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3706 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 737
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3706

                          [Report No. 108-378]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2004

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           September 28, 2004

              Reported by Mr. Domenici, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To adjust the boundary of the John Muir National Historic Site, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``John Muir National Historic Site 
Boundary Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) Boundary.--The boundary of the John Muir National Historic Site 
is adjusted to include the lands generally depicted on the map entitled 
``Boundary Map, John Muir National Historic Site'' numbered PWR-OL 426-
80,044a and dated August 2001.
    (b) Land Acquisition.--The Secretary of the Interior is authorized 
to acquire the lands and interests in lands identified as the 
``Boundary Adjustment Area'' on the map referred to in subsection (a) 
by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, exchange, or 
otherwise.
    (c) Administration.--The lands and interests in lands described in 
subsection (b) shall be administered as part of the John Muir National 
Historic Site established by the Act of August 31, 1964 (78 Stat. 753; 
16 U.S.C. 461 note).

                                                       Calendar No. 737

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3706

                          [Report No. 108-378]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To adjust the boundary of the John Muir National Historic Site, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
**Exhibit23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-70050, 33-80985,333-32237 and 333-57754 of Aldila, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration StatementNo. 33-81792 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 9, 2007, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Aldila, Inc. for the year ended December 31,2006.
| /s/squar, milner, peterson, miranda &  williamson, llp |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                       |
| San Diego, California                                      |
| March 14, 2007                                             |

 

----
Exhibit
23





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-85530, dated October 21, 1994, Registration No. 333-3464, dated April
18, 1996, Registration No. 33-63085, dated September 9, 1998, Registration
No. 333-82185, dated July 2, 1999, and Registration No. 333-118506, dated
August 24, 2004 on Form S-8 and the Registration No. 33-62012, dated
April 11, 1996, Registration No. 333-91649, dated November 24,
1999 and Registration No. 333-51400, dated December 7, 2000 on Form S-3 of
our reports dated March 10, 2010, relating to our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Innodata Isogen Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the years then ended
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (which
report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness)of Innodata Isogen, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009,
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Innodata Isogen Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ J.H.
COHN LLP





Roseland,
New Jersey


March 10,
2010
§ 135.607 Flight Data Monitoring System. After April 23, 2018, no person may operate a helicopter in air ambulance operations unless it is equipped with an approved flight data monitoring system capable of recording flight performance data. This system must: ( a ) Receive electrical power from the bus that provides the maximum reliability for operation without jeopardizing service to essential or emergency loads, and
( b ) Be operated from the application of electrical power before takeoff until the removal of electrical power after termination of flight.
§ 135.261 Applicability. Sections 135.263 through 135.273 of this part prescribe flight time limitations, duty period limitations, and rest requirements for operations conducted under this part as follows: ( a ) Section 135.263 applies to all operations under this subpart.
( b ) Section 135.265 applies to: ( 1 ) Scheduled passenger-carrying operations except those conducted solely within the state of Alaska. “Scheduled passenger-carrying operations” means passenger-carrying operations that are conducted in accordance with a published schedule which covers at least five round trips per week on at least one route between two or more points, includes dates or times (or both), and is openly advertised or otherwise made readily available to the general public, and
( 2 ) Any other operation under this part, if the operator elects to comply with § 135.265 and obtains an appropriate operations specification amendment.
( c ) Sections 135.267 and 135.269 apply to any operation that is not a scheduled passenger-carrying operation and to any operation conducted solely within the State of Alaska, unless the operator elects to comply with § 135.265 as authorized under paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( d ) Section 135.271 contains special daily flight time limits for operations conducted under the helicopter emergency medical evacuation service (HEMES).
( e ) Section 135.273 prescribes duty period limitations and rest requirements for flight attendants in all operations conducted under this part.
[Doc. No. 23634, 50 FR 29320, July 18, 1985, as amended by Amdt. 135-52, 59 FR 42993, Aug. 19, 1994]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL MARTIN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 214 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of December, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# Official Journal C 126/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 126 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6412 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 126

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6412 April 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2021/C 126/01 | Update of the list of residence permits referred to in Article 2(16) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2021/C 126/01

Update of the list of residence permits referred to in Article 2(16) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Editorial Note on Part 139
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

§ 139.339 Airport condition reporting. In a manner authorized by the Administrator, each certificate holder must— ( a ) Provide for the collection and dissemination of airport condition information to air carriers.
( b ) In complying with paragraph (a) of this section, use the NOTAM system, as appropriate, and other systems and procedures authorized by the Administrator.
( c ) In complying with paragraph (a) of this section, provide information on the following airport conditions that may affect the safe operations of air carriers: ( 1 ) Construction or maintenance activity on movement areas, safety areas, or loading ramps and parking areas.
( 2 ) Surface irregularities on movement areas, safety areas, or loading ramps and parking areas.
( 3 ) Snow, ice, slush, or water on the movement area or loading ramps and parking areas.
( 4 ) Snow piled or drifted on or near movement areas contrary to § 139.313.
( 5 ) Objects on the movement area or safety areas contrary to § 139.309.
( 6 ) Malfunction of any lighting system, holding position signs, or ILS critical area signs required by § 139.311.
( 7 ) Unresolved wildlife hazards as identified in accordance with § 139.337.
( 8 ) Nonavailability of any rescue and firefighting capability required in §§ 139.317 or 139.319.
( 9 ) Any other condition as specified in the Airport Certification Manual or that may otherwise adversely affect the safe operations of air carriers.
( d ) Each certificate holder must prepare and keep, for at least 12 consecutive calendar months, a record of each dissemination of airport condition information to air carriers prescribed by this section.
( e ) FAA Advisory Circulars contain methods and procedures for using the NOTAM system and the dissemination of airport information that are acceptable to the Administrator.