alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Memorandum

To: Four Corners Powpj Plant Permit File, NN 14-01 and T-002-NN

From: Lisa BeckhamI..}4~-”

Date: 7/10/2014

Re: SAM Emissions Limits in Permits Issued by the Wyoming Department for Environmental Quality

On July 10, 2014, I spoke with Cole Anderson, New Source Review Program Manager at the Air Quality

Division for the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality regarding two coal-fired power plants in

Wyoming.

Naughton Plant

Mr. Anderson confirmed that the Naughton Plant, in order to meet BART, received a PSD permit to add

SCR and a baghouse for Unit 3 at the plant, which included a limit on H2S04 emissions. However, the

source later decided that as part of its future business model it would be converting to natural gas. Units

1 and 2 were not required to add 5CR.

Dry Fork — Basin Electric Power Cooperative

Mr. Anderson confirmed that this facility began operating, approximately, in 2012. It has undergone

initial performance testing and has not had any violations of its permitted emission limits, including its

H2S04 emissions limit.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual Report of TechLite,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-KSB  for the year  ended  December  31,  2004 (the
"Report"),  I, J.D.  Arvidson,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  ss.78m or ss.78o(d));
and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  May 23, 2005
                                             /s/ J.D. Arvidson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            J.D. Arvidson
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT31.1

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Alimi Ahmed, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report of Emerald Medical Applications Corp.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

 

4.The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as 4efined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation offinancial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’smost recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3755 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3755

 To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to insure 
          zero-downpayment mortgages for one-unit residences.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2004

Mr. Tiberi (for himself, Mr. Scott of Georgia, Mr. Oxley, Mr. Ney, Mr. 
   Turner of Ohio, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. King of New York, Mr. 
 Renzi, Mr. Lucas of Kentucky, and Mr. Clay) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to insure 
          zero-downpayment mortgages for one-unit residences.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Zero Downpayment Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. INSURANCE FOR ZERO-DOWNPAYMENT MORTGAGES.

    The National Housing Act is amended as follows:
            (1) Mortgage insurance authority.--In Section 203 (12 
        U.S.C. 1709) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(y) Zero-Downpayment Mortgages.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of this section or any other section of this title, the 
Secretary is authorized to insure, and to commit to insure, any 
mortgage involving a property upon which there is located a dwelling 
designed principally for a 1-family residence which (1) involves a 
principal obligation not in excess of 100 percent of the applicable 
maximum dollar amount limit under subsection (b)(2)(A) for a one-unit 
dwelling, and (2) is not in excess of 100 percent of the appraised 
value of the property plus any initial service charges, appraisal, 
inspection, and other fees in connection with the mortgage as approved 
by the Secretary. The Secretary is authorized to establish any 
additional requirements as may be necessary, or appropriate, including 
requirements regarding mortgagor and property eligibility.''.
            (2) General insurance fund.--In section 519(e) (12 U.S.C. 
        1735c(e)), by striking ``and 203(i)'' and inserting ``, 203(i), 
        and 203(y)''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.29

                           PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION

       AMENDMENT TO THE NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT ("AMENDMENT")

     THIS AMENDMENT TO NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT (this "Amendment")
dated as of May 18, 2001, is made by and between Peabody Energy Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") and the undersigned employee of the Company
or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates (the "Optionee").

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.7 of the Option Agreement, the Company and
the Optionee have the power to amend the Option Agreement if they deem it
appropriate;

     WHEREAS, concomitantly herewith, that certain Stockholders Agreement dated
as of May 19, 1998, among the Company, the Optionee and other parties thereto
(the "Stockholders Agreement") is amended to clarify certain rights granted
thereunder to Management Investors and their Permitted Transferees (as such
terms are defined in the Stockholders Agreement); and

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee desire to amend the Option Agreement
to reflect certain additional changes agreed upon by the parties to the
Stockholders Agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Option Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

                                       I.

     Section 3.4(c) of the Option Agreement, as previously amended, is further
amended by deleting subsection 3.4(c)(i) in its entirety and replacing it with
the following:

     "(i) upon completion of an IPO on or before July 31, 2001, at least 50% of
     the shares subject to the Superperformance Option I shall vest and the
     balance shall vest in accordance with the IRR chart set forth in Section
     3.3 above".

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed and delivered by the
parties hereto.

                                      PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION


                                          By:
                                                 -------------------------------
                                          Title: VP - Human Resources
                                                 -------------------------------


                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Optionee Signature


                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Optionee Name (Please Print)



                                      1
<PAGE>   2



EXHIBIT 10.29 - PARTIES TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
-------------------------------------------

Irl F. Engelhardt
Sharon D. Fiehler
Jeffery L. Klinger
Richard A. Navarre
Fredrick D. Palmer
Paul H. Vining
Roger B. Walcott, Jr.
Richard M. Whiting
<PAGE>
 
                                 Exhibit 11.1
 
                              SODAK GAMING, INC.
 
               CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
 
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                           YEAR ENDED            YEAR ENDED           YEAR ENDED
                                         DECEMBER 31, 1994    DECEMBER 31, 1995    DECEMBER 31, 1996
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------
     <S>                                 <C>                  <C>                  <C>   
     SHARES OUTSTANDING
 
          Weighted average common
            shares outstanding                  22,716,932               22,722,276         22,757,688
 
          Adjustment for common
            stock equivalents                        3,868                   50,042            208,252
                                          -------------------------------------------------------------
          Weighted average number of
            common and common equivalent
            shares outstanding                  22,720,800               22,772,318         22,965,940
                                          ============================================================
 
     NET EARNINGS                              $ 9,897,122              $12,893,341        $13,232,628
                                          ============================================================
  
     EARNINGS PER SHARE                        $      0.44              $      0.57        $      0.58
                                          ============================================================
</TABLE> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 13.229 Witness fees. ( a ) *General.* The party who applies for a subpoena to compel the attendance of a witness at a deposition or hearing, or the party at whose request a witness appears at a deposition or hearing, must pay the witness fees described in this section.
( b ) *Amount.* Except for an employee of the agency who appears at the direction of the agency, a witness who appears at a deposition or hearing is entitled to the same fees and allowances provided for under 28 U.S.C. 1821.
§ 1261.502 Notification procedures. ( a ) Before collecting any claims through administrative offset, a 30-day written notice must be sent to the debtor by certified mail, return receipt requested. The notice must include: ( 1 ) The nature and amount of the debt;
( 2 ) NASA's intention to collect by administrative offset; and
( 3 ) An explanation of the debtor's rights under 31 U.S.C. 3716(a), or other relied upon statutory authority, which must include a statement that the debtor has the opportunity, within the 30-day notice period, to: ( i ) Inspect and copy records of NASA with respect to the debt;
( ii ) Request a review by NASA of its decision related to the claim; and
( iii ) Enter into a written agreement with the designated official (see § 1261.402) to repay the amount of the claim. However, sound judgment should be exercised in determining whether to accept a repayment agreement in lieu of offset. The determination should balance the Government's interest in collecting the debt against fairness to the debtor. If the debt is delinquent and the debtor has not disputed its existence or amount, NASA should accept a repayment agreement in lieu of offset only if the debtor is able to establish that offset would result in undue financial hardship or would be against equity and good conscience.
( b ) NASA may effect administrative offset against a payment to be made to a debtor prior to the completion of the procedures required by paragraph (a) of this section if: ( 1 ) Failure to take the offset would substantially prejudice the Government's ability to collect the debt; and
( 2 ) The time before the payment is to be made does not reasonably permit the completion of those procedures. Such prior offset must be promptly followed by the completion of those procedures. Amounts recovered by offset but later found not to be owed to the Government shall be promptly refunded.
( 3 ) In cases where the procedural requirements of paragraph (a) of this section had previously been provided to the debtor in connection with the same debt under some other statutory or regulatory authority, such as pursuant to a notice of audit disallowance or salary offset under § 1261.603, the agency is not required to duplicate those requirements before taking administrative offset.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the Registrant) for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | November 7, 2008       



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | November 7, 2008
#### § 1263.107 Procedure to be followed when response to a demand is required before the General Counsel or designate has reached a final decision.

If a response to a demand is required before the General Counsel or designate can render a decision, the employee subpoenaed, or an agency attorney or other government attorney designated for that purpose, shall appear on behalf of the employee and shall furnish the authority which issued the demand a copy of these regulations, and inform the authority that the demand has been referred for the prompt consideration of the General Counsel, and shall respectfully request the authority to stay the demand until the General Counsel or designate has rendered a final decision.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
      knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of ANTs software
      inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended September 30,
      2007:





1.  Fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      certification is being provided
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor
      is
      it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:    November
      8, 2007





By:           __/s/
      Kenneth Ruotolo


Kenneth
      Ruotolo, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
      Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
      request.
**Exhibit      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

| (1)   | The                report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                        |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                registrant.  |

| July                27, 2007                                           |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                   |   |
|                                                                   |   |
| /s/                Jeffrey R. Immelt                                   |   |
| Jeffrey                R. ImmeltChief                Executive Officer |   |
|                                                         |   |
| /s/                Keith S. Sherin                                     |   |
| Keith                S. SherinChief                Financial Officer   |   |
§ 13.57 Subpoenas and witness fees. ( a ) *Application.* The hearing officer, upon application by any party to the proceeding, may issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses or the production of documents or tangible things at a hearing or for the purpose of taking depositions, as permitted by law. The application for producing evidence must show its general relevance and reasonable scope. Absent good cause shown, a party must file a request for a subpoena at least: ( 1 ) 15 days before a scheduled deposition under the subpoena; or
( 2 ) 30 days before a scheduled hearing where attendance at the hearing is sought.
( b ) *Procedure.* A party seeking the production of a document in the custody of an FAA employee must use the discovery procedure found in § 13.53, and if necessary, a motion to compel under § 13.49. A party that applies for the attendance of an FAA employee at a hearing must send the application, in writing, to the hearing officer. The application must set forth the need for that employee's attendance.
( c ) *Fees.* Except for an employee of the agency who appears at the direction of the agency, a witness who appears at a deposition or hearing is entitled to the same fees and allowances as provided for under 28 U.S.C. 1821. The party who applies for a subpoena to compel the attendance of a witness at a deposition or hearing, or the party at whose request a witness appears at a deposition or hearing, must pay the witness fees and allowances described in this section.
( d ) *Service of subpoenas.* Any person who is at least 18 years old and not a party may serve a subpoena. Serving a subpoena requires delivering a copy to the named person. Except for the complainant, the party that requested the subpoena must tender at the time of service the fees for 1 day's attendance and the allowances allowed by law if the subpoena requires that person's attendance. Proving service, if necessary, requires the filing with the FAA Hearing Docket of a statement showing the date and manner of service and the names of the persons served. The server must certify the statement.
( e ) *Motion to quash or modify the subpoena.* A party, or any person served with a subpoena, may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena with the hearing officer at or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance. The movant must describe, in detail, the basis for the application to quash or modify the subpoena including, but not limited to, a statement that the testimony, document, or tangible thing is not relevant to the proceeding, that the subpoena is not reasonably tailored to the scope of the proceeding, or that the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive. A motion to quash or modify the subpoena will stay the effect of the subpoena pending a decision by the hearing officer on the motion.
( f ) *Enforcement of subpoena.* If a person disobeys a subpoena, a party may apply to a U.S. district court to seek judicial enforcement of the subpoena.